1988.06.06 CC Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

City Council meeting of June 6. 1988 Page 4 7. The use does not display, either inside or outside the dwellinq, materials, goods, supplies, or equipment related to the home occupation. 8. The use is continuous, in contrast to occasional use, such as garage sales, auctions, or temporary stands for the sale or display of merchandise. 9. The use shall not involve advertising signs on the premises or other on-site advertising which calls attention to the fact that the dwelling is being used for business purposes. 10. That the home occupation is an accessory use of the dwelling that is so located and conducted that the average person, under normal circumstances, would not be aware of its existence. Councilman Potts questioned whether the city could approve a home occupation in an accessory building citing Chapter 320-3, Subd. B(41). Atkinson withdrew his motion and Peltier her second. Mr. Perrault was advised to apply for site plan approval for the construction of a 40' x 50' accessory building to store his band equipment. Mr. Perrault withdrew his application for a special use permit for a home occupation which was accepted by the City Council. Atkinson made motion, Peltier seconded, to approve the variance request of Michael Perrault, 17803 Henna Avenue North, located in the NE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 3, T31N, R21W, Washington County, Minnesota, to construct a 4i►' x 5c_►' storage building within 16' of the north property line (20' required) and no closer than 27' of the road right-of-way (40' required). All aye. Motion Carried. SPECIAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT (LAMETTI CONSTRUCTION) On behalf of L-6 Properties, Ms. Cheryl Lametti has made application to the City of Hugo for an amended special use permit on their property located at 16028 Forest Boulevard North, Hugo, Minnesota. The property in question is zoned industrial, and contains approximately 22.5 acres located in the SE 1/4 of the Section 8.T31N, R21W, lying west of the right-of-way of the Northern Pacific Railroad. The special use permit request is to allow continued use of two temporary trailers, and to attach wooden structures, to -be used for temporary off.ice facilities for an extended five-year period. The applicants have indicated, that if they construct a permanent office complex on the site, the old buildings will be removed. The applicants are also requesting authorization to upgrade their existing entrance to Highway 61 by bituminous patching of the abandoned railroad crossing, and allowance for an additional access from Highway 61 as noted on the site plan. Two years ago, the City Council approved a special use permit allowing use of the temporary buildings in question for a specified period of time which expires this year. The applicants are requesting an extension of their special use permit to allow continued use of their property as noted herein. The existing buildings are located in the southeast corner of the property and just