Laserfiche WebLink
52 <br />May 4, 1987 <br />5. Off-street parking shall be provided for all participants. <br />6. Satellite or equal type of facilities to be provided. <br />7. Liability insurance, in the amount of $300,000.00, shall be kept in force at <br />all times games are operating. <br />8. No one under 18 years of age will be allowed to participate. <br />9. No trespassing signs shall be installed on the perimeters of the playing <br />areas,and operators shall instruct participants to confine their games to the <br />approved areas. Failing to do this, the city reserves the right to require <br />fencing at some future date if damage to surrounding property becomes a problem. <br />10. No game shall be allowed when the temperature is 320 or lower. <br />11. Applicants shall draft a hold -harmless agreement in favor of the City of Hugo <br />to indemnify and protect the city against lawsuit arising out of these <br />activities. <br />12. The Special Use Permit shall be void if the majority of the City Council deems <br />that it is inconsistent with development of surrounding areas. <br />13. This permit shall run with the applicants (Tony Caron and Dan Santanni), not <br />with the land. <br />14. The activities on site will not cause the altering of any watercourse, ditch, <br />or drainage system. <br />15. Hours of operation shall be from 7:00 AM to 7:30 PM. <br />16. Offensive odors, glare, smoke, or noise is prohibited, and must not be <br />offensive to neighboring property owners. <br />17. This permit is subject annual review at the discretion of the City Council. <br />VOTING AYE: Peltier, Olson, Vail, Atkinson <br />VOTING NAY: Potts <br />Motion Carried. <br />7.A Hugo Meadows Feasibility Report <br />In July of 1986, the Harstad Companies made application to the City of Hugo for <br />the subdivision of approximately 27 acres zoned SFU into 48 buildable homesites. <br />The property in question is generally described as a part of the NE4 of Section 29, <br />T31N, R21W, in the City of Hugo. the Hugo Planning Commission reviewed this <br />matter at their August 13, 1986 regular meeting, and said Commission unanimously <br />recommended approval of the preliminary sketch plan subject to completion of an <br />engineering feasibility study for this project. This matter was then reviewed <br />by the Hugo City Council, and the Harstad Companies were directed to have a <br />feasibility report prepared, addressing, at a minimum, the following: <br />1. Plat compliance with the city's subdivision regulations. <br />2. Parkland dedication. <br />3. Control of stormwater runoff on site. <br />4. Impact of stormwater runoff on drainage ditch downstream. <br />5. Extension of water and sewer to the site. <br />6. Estimated cost of utility installation. <br />A copy of the engineer's report, prepared by Howard Kuusisto, was submitted to <br />the City Council for review at their April 6, 1987 regular meeting. Mr. Dick <br />Wedell of Harstad Companies has been in continual contact with the city with <br />regard to what steps he now has to take to move this project forward. Mr. Wedell <br />has stated that they have revised their stormwater control plan, as well as on-site <br />ponding, to the satisfaction of the RCWD. We have suggested that Mr. Wedell pro- <br />vide the city with written documentation that their plans for stormwater control, <br />