Laserfiche WebLink
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015 Laserfiche. All rights reserved.
$$0�2 OCTOBER 24, 1974 MINUTES OF PROCEEDINGS OF THE CITY COUNCIL CITY OF HUGO <br /> � <br /> The meeting opened at 10:50 AM with Mayor Lease, Irene Leroux, Jim <br /> Smith present. LaValle and Martin were absent. Attorney Charles <br /> Johnson and Engineer Howard Kuusisto were also present. <br /> The meeting was held to discuss and correct any errors made in the <br /> sewer assessments, as follows: <br /> 1 . Robert Ricci- 35020-4050 was 208 feet, should be changed. Changed <br /> to 138 feet frontage. <br /> 2. Edmond Granger-351353700 was charged 150 feet, changed to 117 feet. <br /> 3. Granger's DX - assessment remains the same with 2 REC'S. <br /> 4. Howard Moe-35020-2500-remains the same. <br /> 5. Adam Mikrot-35135-8700-was 158 feet-correct as stands. <br /> 6. Albert Ethier-platted lot-no change. <br /> 7. Harley Johnson-35019-2250-he felt they should have put in another <br /> line across the road for future development. <br /> 8. Frank Hueb1-►35020-2250 was 150 feet, changed to 125 feet. <br /> 9. Drexel Pugh-35029-2900-not to be assessed minus 125 feet, 1 REC 7 <br /> 1 Stub Charge. 35029-2810 should be 114 feet, no REC & 1 Stub Charge. <br /> 10. Jim Wisner 35272-2250-was charged 104.20, should be changed to 100 feet. <br /> 11 . Ron Sparrow-35020-2650-was 125 feet, changed to 100 feet. <br /> 12. H. Snyder-didn't get assessment. Hick's property? <br /> 13. Joe Oman-Stands as is. <br /> 14. Sterling Ashby 120 feet minus 25 feet. Should be 95 feet. <br /> The Council recessed for lunch and reopened the meeting at 1 :50 PM for <br /> discussion from the floor. Residents registered to be heard as they came <br /> in. <br /> 1 . Mrs. Sterlilng Ashby was told 35020-2230 would be reduced to 95 feet. <br /> 2. Mrs. Ron Sparrow was told 35020-2650 would be reduced to 100 feet. <br /> 3. Ed Granger was told 35135-3700 was changed to 117. feet, and 35278-225 <br /> was changed to 125 feet. <br /> 4. Dean Vail's assessment had been miscalculated. 35135-7850 was 135 feet <br /> and should be changed to 108.5 feet. <br /> 5. Vern Peloquin-discussed, but solved nothing. To be further discussed. <br /> 6. Joe Oman-Trailer Court-objected to being charged full REC'S for the <br /> trailers. Was assessed 107 REC's could be changed to 106 REC's, <br /> and when given to Ehlers, include $7000.00 Connection Charge. <br /> 7. Stan Tikkanen for the White Bear School District objected to increase <br /> in REC charge from 1973 estimates. The basis for the REC was the <br /> number of students. <br /> 8. Fran Morissette-35135-5200 was charge 100 feet, 2 REC's and 2 stub <br /> Charges. Minus 1 REC and 1 Stub Charge. <br /> 9. Harley Johnson objects to 650 foot assessment when sewer is unusable <br /> to him. Contractor to check the site to see if they can put another <br /> line across the road. To be discussed further. <br /> 10. Ed Waugh-objected to method of arriving at REC's. Said their seating <br /> capacity is 160, not 200 as in the Liquor Application. Council will <br /> discuss this further. <br /> 11 . Robert Ricci-changed from 208 feet to 138 feet. He also objected to <br /> the method of arriving at REC's. Felt it should be based on usage. <br /> 12. Albert Ethier-No change. <br /> 13. Howard Moe-35020-2300-says he has 455 feet not 495 feet. He sold <br /> 50 feet to Bill Trepanier. He is to bing in survey to show this. <br /> 14. Mike Steiner questioned what the SAC charge was. Answer-Metro Charge. <br /> 15. Frank Huebl-Changed from 150 feet to 125 feet. <br /> 16. Joe Thill-to be taken off assessment roll, as the land belongs to <br /> Lindau. Must get Lindau's parcel number. <br />