Laserfiche WebLink
MAY 20, 1975 <br /> VOTING FOR: Lease, Smith and Schletty. <br /> MOTION CARRIED <br /> 6.1 RESIDENTIAL EQUIVALENT CHARGE <br /> The Sewer Ordinance does not list the cost of the TEC on new <br /> homes. Attorney Johnson and Engineer Kuusisto had discussed the <br /> charge and also an annual percent increase and what would be a <br /> reasonable end point. Not having come to any conclusion, further <br /> discussion was to be made with Ehlers and they were to report at <br /> the next meeting, June 2, 1975. <br /> Lease stated that any new homes would have to pay the $515.00 <br /> in order to obtain the building permit. <br /> COMPREHENSIVE EMPLOYMENT AND TRAINING ACT (CETA) <br /> A duplicate request was made by the City of Hugo and also the Police <br /> Department. The City Council acted on a Maintenance Man for the City of <br /> Hugo so this job description is the only one that they wanted submitted. <br /> Smith will call and discuss with Mr. Larson regarding any further information <br /> PIONEER CLUB PROBLEM <br /> Letter was read from Mikeworth and Bartholdi. No actual claim was filed <br /> by the Pioneer Club against the City of Hugo for damages. <br /> MOTION: Lease made motion, Smith seconded, to have Attorney Johnson and <br /> Engineer Kuusisto get to gether all details regarding the <br /> sewer problem for a response to Mikeworth and Bartholdi letter <br /> pertaining to the Pioneer Club. <br /> VOTING FOR: Lease, Smith and Schletty. <br /> MOTION CARRIED <br /> HUD AUDIT CONTRACT <br /> A draft of the Audit Contract has been submitted through the Engineers <br /> office. The auditing firm has agreed to the terms and asked for a change <br /> from 15 to 20 days which was agreed upon. Engineer has preliminary approval <br /> from Telfers. <br /> HORSESHOE LAKE DRAINAGE <br /> An estimated total cost was submitted for the recommendations of the Rice <br /> Creek Watershed District. The Council must petition the Rice Creek Water- <br /> shed District for the proposed work. The Watershed District will then hold <br /> a public hearing, send out the hearing notices and determine the affected <br /> drainage area. The Watershed District would assess the costs and the City <br /> would collect the assessment. Part of the proposed improvement is outside <br /> the City limits of Hugo, and this is where the Watershed District helps <br /> coordinate the project between the governmental agencies involved. <br /> As the City Engineer was not present at the meeting, the Horseshoe Lake <br /> Drainage Problem will be put on the agenda for the June 2, 1975 City <br /> Council Meeting. <br />