1996.04.08 ORD 1996-309 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

PRINTER'S AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION CITY OF HUGO WASHINGTON COUNTY,MINNESOTA AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ORDINANCE NO.96-309 TOWN OF MAY WASHINGTON COUNTY,MINNESOTA STATE OF MINNESOTA) ORDINANCE NO.96-510 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING A County of Ramsey ) STORM SEWER IMPROVEMENT TAX DIS- TRICT WITHIN THE MEANING OF MINNESO- TA STATUTE§444.16 ET.SEQ. The City Council for the City of Hugo, I, the publisher, or the publisher's designated agent, being duly sworn, Washington County, Minnesota and the Town Board of Supervisors of the Town of May, on oath state that I am the publisher, or the publisher's designated Washington County, Minnesota hereby ordain agent and an employee of the newspaper known as The White Bear as follows: Section 1.Purpose. d This Ordinance is adopted to establish a Press, and that I have full knowledge of the facts which are state storm sewer improvement tax district within the below: meaning of Minnesota Statute§444.16 et.seq. The district is established in order to authorize and fund a study and any necessary improve- (A)The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constitut- in an area solve a problem with flooding existingrdr ingqualification as a qualified newspaper, asprovided byMinnesota in an which overlaps the common border This flooding the City of Hugoe andr the Town af May. Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. This has caused property damage to PP citizens of the two municipalities and has endangered and made impassable public (B)The Printed City of Hngn Ordinance 9E-51n roads. The governing bodies of the City and Town have determined that it is in the best interests which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and of their respective municipalities to set up a wasprinted andpublished once each week, forOne successive weeks;to insure that work is done to the bene- fit of the residents of the area and that the costs it was firstpublished on WEdne s c3 a , the 2a day of are fairly and equitably apportioned among Y those properties contributing water to the flood- May , 19 9 6, and was thereafter printed and published on ing problem. Section 2.Authority. The City and Town have adopted this every to and including , Ordinance pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statute §444.16 et. seq. and pur- the day of , 19 ; and printed below is a suant to the terms of the Joint Powers Agreement adopted by the City and Town on copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is the 22nd day of January,1996. Section 3.Description of Land. hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the Pursuant to Minnesota Statute§444.17,the territory or area included within the storm sewer composition and publication of the notice: improvement district is described with particu- larity on the attached Exhibit A, said land is abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz g hereinafter referred to herein as the05.1-1 / _••Subwatershed." $Y !!!///111Cti (,J Section 4.Name of District. The storm sewer improvement district cre- ated herein shall hereinafter be referred to as TITLE: Publisher the"Hugo/May Joint Storm Sewer Improvement Tax District No.1." Section 5.Ordering the Study. The City Council for the City of Hugo and Subscribed and sworn to before me on the Town Board of the Town of May hereby authorize and direct the City of Hugo to autho- this 2 9 day of May ,19 • _ SUSANNE WESTPHAL rize its engineer to conduct a storm sewer NOTARY PUBLIC-MINNESOTA improvement study to determine what storm .AS/1 RAMSEY COUNTY sewer improvement project, if any, should be ` �, �► •��•✓ My Commission Expires Jan.81,2000 undertaken to solve the problem with the flood- . ..�..._f y �I�9�L ing referred to herein.The report shall advise the City and the Town in a preliminary way as Notary Public,Ramsey County, Minn. to: a. whether the proposed improvement is feasible; My commission expires January 31. 2000. b.whether it should be made as proposed or in connection with some other improve- ments; c.the estimated cost of the improvement; RATE INFORMATION and d. a proposed method for assessing the (1)Lowest classified rate paid by costs of the study and any proposed improve- $ commercial users for comparable space. (Line, word, or inch rate) • (2)Maximum rate allowed by law for $ the above matter. (Line, word, or inch rate) (3)Rate actually charged for the $ 6- 0 0 T n r h above matter. (Line, word, or inch rate)