My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2010.10.11 EDA Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Minutes
>
2010 EDA Minutes
>
2010.10.11 EDA Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/7/2015 1:45:28 PM
Creation date
12/7/2015 1:38:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
10/11/2010
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff recommended that the EDA discuss each topic and provide direction to staff on how to <br />move forward. <br />Miron stated that he liked the idea of partnering up with Washington County for economic <br />development incentives like tax abatement. <br />Denaway stated that we do not lose anything by requesting that the County certify the district <br />on the original request date. TIF is certain in this case and tax abatement is not. <br />The CD Director stated that we can drop parcels from the district at any time if we leave the <br />TIF district as is, but there may be other incentives for developers that the City can provide. <br />Thistle stated that he thinks the EDA should request certification on the original date. The <br />City has spent time and money on the creation of the district. The City has been advertising <br />the TIF District to the public. <br />Denaway made a motion, seconded by Klein, to move forward with option one and request <br />that the County certify the district on the original request date. Staff should work on other <br />development incentive if TIF financing does not work for a project. <br />All aye. Motion Carried. <br />DISCUSSION ON CITY RENTAL PROPERTIES IN DOWNTOWN <br />The City owns two rental properties in downtown across from City Hall (barber <br />shop/printing building and a duplex). For the last several years the duplex has been rented out <br />and the barber shop has been rented out. Staff discussed what the future will be for the two <br />building with the EDA. <br />The CD Director stated the house that the City rents out is in bad condition and will be <br />vacant soon. The print building is also expected to be vacant soon. The buildings could be <br />rented out again or demolished. <br />Miron asked what the holding costs for each building was. <br />The CD Director stated that staff did not have that information for the EDA this morning, but <br />the City does pay insurance, utilities and staff time to manage and maintain the buildings. <br />Miron asked staff to bring the holding costs to the EDA at their next meeting. <br />Klein asked if we take then down, would that be an incentive for developers to come to Hugo <br />and build in downtown. <br />Arcand asked what the inside of the buildings looked like and would be going in and fix <br />them up to rent out again. <br />The CD Director stated that there are a lot of items to fix and would be a large cost. <br />Thistle stated that once a building is vacant it starts to look bad pretty quick and becomes a <br />security issue. If the buildings are not rented out they should be removed. <br />Miron stated that the EDA should discuss this item at their next meeting when they can look <br />at the holding costs for the buildings. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.