Laserfiche WebLink
Policy #4004 <br />4. Iia -ea�sefi,� 4 --he <br />meets the "�'but "'legislation. Washington County door, <br />f+,Lyn r,ra rF uddiAsthrir--tts for deve.4 6- <br />04at-VI/$k;}i <br />within the GOunty without TIF assistaRGAM. <br />4. &.--The extent to which the proposal redevelops areas that have experienced <br />blight or contamination as described in M.S. 469.174, Subd. 10, 10a, 16. <br />5. 6. extent to which the project requires improvements in county <br />infrastructure and the extent to which the TIF district will pay for the cost of these <br />improvements as described in M.S. 469.175, Subd. la. <br />6_7—The extent to which the proposal results in an increase in new <br />employment opportunities that provide geediiving wages and benefits for <br />employees. <br />8.The extent to which a TIF district for housing contributes to the availability of <br />housing for persons or families of low and moderate income. <br />7. Washington County supports housing strategies that create scattered site <br />low income housing options, rather than concentrated development of low <br />income housing in complexes or "projects". <br />_ <br />- - <br />_ <br />8_10.—The impact of the proposed TIF district on other county service costs; <br />e.g., Sheriff, human services, prosecution services, etc. <br />9. 44—.TIF proposals must comply with the following administrative requirements <br />fnr oAgc_nf_administFatkW: <br />A. Ae6erat£Comply with Minnesota Statutes. <br />B. Contain an accurate legal description of the district boundaries. <br />B---le-sp4f)arsels-. <br />C. Must be complete existing tax parcels of record. Nosplit or <br />fractional property tax parcels may be included. <br />Resi)onsibifl <br />Count By oard <br />Implemented: November 26, 1996 Page 2 of 4 <br />Revised: November 9, 2010 <br />Revised: Month dd. 2015 <br />