My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2015.11.17 EDA Agenda Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2015 EDA Packets
>
2015.11.17 EDA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2016 9:47:01 AM
Creation date
1/11/2016 9:44:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
11/17/2015
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Transitways <br />Current Revenue Scenario Transitways <br />The TPP's Transit Investment Plan does not show any transitway investments planned for Hugo in the <br />Current Revenue Scenario (TPP Figure 6-8). <br />Increased Revenue Scenario Transitways <br />The TPP increased Revenue Scenario shows additional transitway corridors beyond the scope of the <br />plan's adopted and fiscally constrained Transit investment Plan (the Current Revenue Scenario). These <br />corridors are listed on page 6.63 of the TPP, and TPP Figure 6-9, which is attached, shows the <br />complete transitway vision for the region. <br />If Hugo believes it might be directly impacted by transitways in the Increased Revenue Scenario (for <br />example, because they are participating in transitway corridor studies or feasibility analyses); the <br />transitways may be acknowledged in the Comprehensive Plan. These additional corridors are or will be <br />under study for mode and alignment recommendations, but they are not included in fiscally constrained <br />plan. However, they should be clearly identified as not funded within the currently expected resources <br />for transitways. The Council recognizes the important planning work that goes into a corridor prior to it <br />becoming part of the region's Transit Investment Plan, especially if increased revenues were to become <br />available. <br />Similar to Current Revenue Scenario Transitways, communities should identify known potential stations <br />along planned transitways and consider guiding land use policies, station area plans, and associated <br />zoning, infrastructure, and implementation tools that support future growth around transit stations. <br />These policies can also influence station siting in initial planning phases of transitway corridors and <br />influence the competitiveness of a transitway for funding. Communities can find further guidance for <br />station area planning in the Transportation section of the Local Planning Handbook and the Transit <br />Oriented Development Guide. <br />Communities not in the Transit Capital Levy District <br />Hugo is not within the Transit Capital Levy District as shown in Fig 1-3 of the TPP (Existing Transit <br />System with Transit Capital Levy District). Regardless of the Transit Market Area or transitway corridor <br />planning, the only transit services provided in this type of community are Transit Link dial -a -ride service <br />and various ridesharing services. A list of Transit Link service areas and communities can be found on <br />the Council's website: httpJ/www.metrocouncil.org/Transportation/ServiceslTransit-LinWTransit Link - <br />Service Areas. aspx?source=child <br />If Hugo is interested in additional transit services and a need for transit services can be identified, Hugo <br />would first have to agree to pay the regional transit capital levy, as defined in MN Stat. 473.446 and <br />473.4461. <br />•l <br />All communities must include an aviation element in the transportation sections of their comprehensive <br />plans. The degree of aviation planning and development considerations that need to be included in the <br />comprehensive plan varies by community. Even those communities not impacted directly by an airport <br />have a responsibility to include airspace protection in their comprehensive plan. The protection element <br />should include potential hazards to air navigation including electronic interference. <br />Hugo is not in an influence area of a regional airport. Airspace protection should be included in local <br />codes/ordinances to control height of structures. <br />Page - 10 1 2015 SYSTEM STATEMENT — HUGO TRANSPORTATION <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.