My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2014.03.11 EDA Agenda Packet
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
EDA
>
EDA Agenda/Packets
>
2014 EDA Packets
>
2014.03.11 EDA Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/11/2016 10:55:57 AM
Creation date
1/11/2016 10:15:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
3/11/2014
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Commission Name
EDA
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Formal Structure (County Community Development Authority) <br />If the County Board chooses a more formal and active role in economic development, one logical <br />path is to seek any necessary special legislation to enhance the capabilities of the Washington <br />County HRA by essentially adding economic development authority powers. Other jurisdictions <br />have successfully completed similar legislative action and established themselves as "community <br />development agencies" (Dakota, Scott, and Carver), that were originally constituted as housing <br />authorities. Any programming would require careful consideration to avoid duplicating efforts <br />currently undertaken by cities, but obtaining legal authority provides the county access to <br />significant authority and financial resources to encourage economic development. Many of the <br />technical skill sets required for implementing economic development strategies exist within the <br />County HRA. (They also exist in many of the larger communities, but are currently limited to <br />those municipal boundaries.) To be responsive to city needs and county board direction, the <br />HRA could certainly undertake and implement programs (i.e. partner with MCCD for example) <br />as soon as possible as long as those efforts are consistent with current authority, while pursuing <br />the necessary legislative amendment process. <br />A possible downside of the CDA model is the risk of diluting private business sector interests on <br />the board. However, the CDA model can have a board comprised entirely of county elected <br />officials or a blended combination of elected and appointed members. As resource commitments <br />increase with a more active and formal participation in economic development activities, county <br />elected officials may choose to have a more direct involvement on the board. They establish <br />advisory committees organized according to the issues they intend to address. If the Washington <br />County Board chooses to pursue a more formal CDA model and wishes to have more direct <br />involvement with county wide housing and economic development initiatives, the structure could <br />accommodate that desire. One of the principles promoted during this process is for the County to <br />be purposeful and deliberate. If the formal CDA model becomes the objective, it will take time <br />and careful collaboration to complete. <br />Washington County Economic Development Strategic Plan 2014 <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.