My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2006.04.27 BOZA Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Board of Zoning
>
BOZA Minutes
>
2006 BOZA Minutes
>
2006.04.27 BOZA Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/12/2016 3:55:06 PM
Creation date
1/12/2016 2:21:36 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
4/27/2006
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Board of Zoning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />HUGO BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS AND APPEALS <br />April 27, 2006 <br />Chairperson Schumann called the meeting to order at 6:31 p.m. <br />PRESENT: Puleo, Schumann <br />ABSENT: Brunotte <br />ALSO PRESENT: Bryan Bear, Community Development Director (CDD) <br />Michele Lindau, Community Development Assistant <br />Minutes of March 23, 2006 <br />Puleo made motion, Schumann seconded, to recommend approval of the minutes of March 23, 2006 <br />as submitted. <br />All Ayes. Motion carried. <br />Variance for John and Renee Uremovich for a Fence <br />The Board considered the request of John and Renee Uremovich, 5515 137th Street North, for a <br />variance to permit a six-foot high fence in a front yard. The property is a corner lot and has two <br />front yards. The home faces 137th Street and the fence would be to the rear of the home along <br />Fiona Avenue North. The zoning ordinance prohibits six-foot high privacy fences in a front yard <br />and limits the height to four feet. <br />Cindy Petty, 13679 Fiona Avenue North, asked where privacy fences were permitted. <br />The CDD explained that six-foot privacy fences were permitted in the rear and side yards and. <br />Fences were limited to four feet in the front yard. <br />Petty said she was worried about increased traffic with the potential development to the east and <br />the safety of her kids and teenager drivers. <br />Schumann pointed out that a six-foot fence would be permitted along the rear property line <br />without the variance and that would be the portion that would block the view, not the section <br />along the street. <br />Petty said the City needed to be careful in the future with granting these types of variances <br />because of safety reasons. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.