2016.02.01 CC Packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Resolution 2016 - Withrow Elementary abandonment of the structure and the eventual establishment of blight within this portion of the city; and WHEREAS, the City of Hugo's Parks Commission has donated some of its limited financial resources toward the installation of recreational playground equipment at Withrow Elementary School for the enjoyment of citizens with the City of Hugo and the Stillwater School District. WHEREAS, the Withrow school grounds include other outdoor recreational amenities that serve a need for area residents, and it remains unclear whether those amenities will remain available or will need to be replaced at a new location and at additional expense to the city of Hugo. WHEREAS, the School District has not requested feedback from the City of Hugo concerning the impacts to the City that such a decision might have. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does respectfully request the Stillwater Area Public School District to do the following: Delay taking any action on February 11, 2016 that involves the closing of schools, and reset all timelines that depend on this action. 2. Create a process that is inclusive of the impacted communities and families and includes an open evaluation of alternatives, vetting of ideas, and proper study of implications. 3. Ensure that any proposal factors the value that the school facilities and associated activities have on the communities in which they are located and determine the impact of the loss of those facilities and activities. 4. Review the "Mission" of the Stillwater School District and determine the proper role of the school district in maintaining a strong community, soliciting feedback and valuing of community partnerships. 5. In partnership with the City of Hugo, evaluate the likelihood of re -use possibilities for Withrow Elementary prior to making a decision. Determine the impacts that a vacant or repurposed facility will have on the vibrancy of this part of the City, or share plans to demolish the facility and return to an allowable agricultural or recreational use. 6. Include within the process a method of community engagement that attempts to identify all positive benefits and negative consequences of the proposal and provide a mechanism for evaluating, weighing, and balancing any factors identified. 7. Determine whether this action collectively improves the quality of life for residents within the community and whether the vacated space may be put to a future use that is beneficial. PA