Laserfiche WebLink
LaValle Fields - Apartment Concept Plan <br />Page 4 <br />A portion of the concept plan shows a building and the gazebo on property that is not controlled <br />by the applicant. Staff is not opposed to this area being added to the project, but it should be <br />resolved with the first phase to ensure proper planning. The concept plan shows building A is <br />planned around the uncontrolled property, but building B and the gazebo are included on the <br />uncontrolled property. <br />During the PUD General Plan approval process the City Council added conditions to the <br />resolution regarding the apartment buildings. The first item required a "revised building <br />orientation and footprint to reduce the appearance of the massing of the large buildings". The <br />concept plan shows two larger buildings, and one in a generally linear design. It is in staff s <br />opinion that the placement of the building to the west and the very long linear design does not <br />meet this condition. It has been discussed with the applicant that the total square footage of the <br />building is not the issue, it's the linear design. The same number of units, or even more units, <br />could be included in the building if the massing of the building was reduced. This could be <br />accomplished with a compact building design that wraps around itself or a non-linear foot print <br />to break up the long expansions of the walls. There are many good examples of apartment <br />buildings, the same size or larger, which have used a compact design or non-linear footprint to <br />reduce the massing of a large building. <br />There is one access into the site from Finale Avenue between Upper 146th Street and 147`h Street. <br />In general this access will work, but the parking area does not have good circulation and includes <br />a long dead end aisle. Staff recommends the plan be revised to allow circulation and eliminate <br />the long dead parking aisle. The access into the underground parking area is located too close to <br />the access into the site. This access will be busy during the morning and afternoon. It is a <br />concern to staff that there will be a congestion issue at this location due to its proximity to the <br />access into the site. Staff recommends that the access into the underground parking be relocated <br />with the consideration of stacking of cars during busy times of the day. <br />The PUD conditions require a trail connection to the existing trail on the senior housing property <br />to Upper 146'h Street to access Lions Park. This has not been shown on the concept plan. There <br />are sidewalks shown within the plan connecting the buildings to the openspace in the center of <br />the site. There seems to be a lot of space within the concept plan that is not used efficiently. It is <br />good that there is a common open space between the buildings, but the buildings could better be <br />oriented to relate to each other and create a large common area with several amenities. <br />Building Architecture <br />The applicant has provided building elevations and renderings of the proposed apartment <br />building A, but has not shown a concept for building B. The applicant has stated that the building <br />materials for building A will be a combination of various types of stone with cement board <br />siding or other comparable siding material. The plans show a pitched roof with dormers along <br />the sides. There are gables periodically along the walls over entrances and in-between. The <br />colors are generally good, but the number of different colors should be reduced and be comprised <br />of compatible earth tones. The building could provide deeper overhangs and include a <br />combination of horizontal and vertical siding design. There was not a calculation submitted for <br />the amount of stone versus other building materials, but it appears more stone needs to be added <br />