My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2016.02.08 CC Packet Goal Setting
Hugo
>
City Council
>
City Council Agenda/Packets
>
2016 CC Packets
>
2016.02.08 CC Packet Goal Setting
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/5/2016 2:17:36 PM
Creation date
2/5/2016 2:14:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
City Council
Document Type
Agenda/Packets
Meeting Date
2/8/2016
Meeting Type
Work Session
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Transportation <br />for the creation and funding of the Larger Cities Assistance Account as proposed in <br />the 2015 legislative session. <br />5-J County State Aid Highway (CSAH) Distribution Formula <br />Significant resource needs remain in the metro area CSAH system. Revenues provided by <br />the Legislature for the CSAH system have resulted in a higher number of projects being <br />completed, however, greater pressure is being placed on municipalities to participate in <br />cost sharing activities, encumbering an already over -burdened local funding system. <br />When the alternative is not building or maintaining roads, cities bear not only the costs of <br />their local systems but also pay upward of fifty percent of county road projects. Metro <br />Cities supports special or additional funding for cities that have burdens of <br />additional cost participation in projects involving county roads. <br />CSAH eligible roads were designated by county engineers in 1956 and although only 10 <br />percent of the CSAH roads are in the metro area, they account for nearly 50 percent of <br />the vehicle miles traveled. The CSAH formula passed by the Legislature in 2008 <br />increased the amount of CSAH funding for the metropolitan area from 18 percent in 2007 <br />to 21 percent in 2011. The formula helps to better account for needs in the metropolitan <br />region, but is only the first step in addressing needs for additional resources for the <br />region. <br />Metro Cities supports a new CSAH formula more equitably designed to fund the <br />needs of our metropolitan region. <br />5-K Municipal Input/Consent for Trunk Highways and County Roads <br />State statutes direct the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) to submit <br />detailed plans, with city cost estimates, at a point one -and -a -half to two years prior to bid <br />letting, at which time public hearings are held for community input. If MnDOT does not <br />concur with requested changes, it may appeal. Currently, that process would take a <br />maximum of three and a half months and the results of the appeals board are binding on <br />both the city and MnDOT. <br />Metro Cities supports the municipal consent process, and opposes changes to <br />weaken municipal consent or adding another level of government to the consent <br />process. Metro Cities opposes changes to current statutes that would allow MnDOT <br />to disregard the appeals board ruling for state trunk highways. Such a change <br />would significantly minimize MnDOT's need to negotiate in good faith with cities <br />for appropriate project access and alignment, and would render the public hearing <br />and appeals process meaningless. Metro Cities also opposes the elimination of the <br />county road municipal consent and appeal process for these reasons. <br />54 2016 Legislative Policies <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.