HomeMy WebLinkAbout2001.06.04 RESO 2001-0020CITY OF HUGO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION 2001- 20
APPROVING SIDE YARD SETBACK VARIANCE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A
DECK FOR MATT RHUDE AND MARY JO LEHMANN FOR PROPERTY
LOCATED AT 5383 -129TH STREET NORTH
WHEREAS, an application has been filed by Matt Rhude and Mary Jo Lehmann that
requests approval of a side yard setback variance for the construction of a deck on
property located at 5383-129' Street North, as legally described as follows:
Insert Legal Description.
WHEREAS, the Boad of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments has reviewed said variance at
a duly called public meeting and recommends approval of the variance.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the
requested variances for Matt Rhude and Mary Jo Lehmann on property located at 5383-
129t' Street N. subject to the following conditions:
1. A 5 -foot side yard setback varinance is approved to construc an approximately 5 -
foot x 15 -foot deck in accordance with the application and plans dated May 11,
2001.
2. A building permit shall be required prior to constructing the deck.
3. The variance is approved based on the following findings:
a. The variance as requested is permissible by law.
The requested variance is from the dimensional requirements of the ordinance and
is permissible by law.
b. The strict enforcement of the ordinance would cause undue hardship
because of circumstances unique to the individual property not caused by the land
owner.
The hardship is unique to the property because of the location of the existing
home and sliding glass door. The home was constructed 12 feet from the east
Resolution 2001- 20
Page 2
property line, and a sliding glass door was installed. The applicant is desirous of
installing a reasonable size deck to provide egress from the home.
C. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent
of the ordinance.
The applicant has attempted to minimize the extent of the encroachment by
constructing a five-foot wide deck
The footings for the deck would be located outside of the six-foot drainage and
utility easement. The deck would itself would cantilever one -foot into the
easement. However, this cantilever would not obstruct drainage between the two
homes.
d. The property can not be put to reasonable use without the granting of the
variance.
The property is planned and zoned for residential use. The applicant is proposing
to add a deck to the east side of the home adjacent to an existing sliding glass
door. As stated in the applicant's narrative, they would like a deck to provide
egress from the home. Further, the applicant has attempted to minimize the extent
of the encroachment by designing a deck that only extends approximately five feet
from the home.
e. The variance, if granted, would not alter the essential character of the
locality in which it would be located.
The proposed deck is consistent with the essential character of this residential
area. While the deck would encroach five feet into the required setback, the deck
is relatively small and would not represent a significant encroachment.
f. The variance, if granted shall not have the effect of allowing, in any
district, any use prohibited in the district.
Decks are permitted in this residential zoning district.
g. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood
protection than required by the ordinance.
The proposed deck would not be within a designated floodplain.
h. The sewage treatment system and water system of the subject property is
in compliance with city and state codes.
The proposed deck would not require any improvements to the municipal water
and sewer systems that serve this property.
Resolution 2001- 20
Page 3
ADOPTED by the City Council on June 4, 2001.
STATE OF MINNESOTA)
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON SS.
The undersigned, being the duly qualified and appointed City Clerk of the City of Hugo,
Minnesota, certifies that I compared the foregoing resolution adopted at a meeting of the
Hugo City Council on June 4, 2001 with the original thereof on file in my office, and the
same is a correct transcription thereof.
WITNESS my hand o ially as such City Clerk and the Corporate seal of the City this
.�� day of ;zoo
City Clerk