My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2007.05.10 PC Minutes
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Planning & Zoning
>
Planning Commission
>
Planning Minutes
>
2007 PC Minutes
>
2007.05.10 PC Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/2/2015 2:27:38 PM
Creation date
2/20/2015 11:30:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commissions
Meeting Date
5/10/2007
Document Type
Minutes
Commission Name
Planning
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br />HUGO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />May 10, 2007 <br />Call to Order <br />Chairman Schumann called the meeting to order at 7:05 p.m. <br />PRESENT: Bailly, McRoberts, Moore, Schumann <br />ABSENT: Kleissler, Rosenquist, Weidt <br />ALSO PRESENT: Bryan Bear, Community Development Director (CDD) <br />Kendra Lindahl, Planner <br />Rachel Simone, Associate Planner <br />Michele Lindau, Secretary <br />Approval of Minutes of April 12, 2007 <br />Schumann made motion, Moore seconded, to approve the Planning Commission minutes of <br />April 12, 2007 as submitted. <br />Ayes: Schumann, McRoberts, Moore <br />Abstain: Bailly <br />Motion carried. <br />Mark LaNasa — CUP for a Shared Driveway <br />The Commission held a public hearing to consider the request of Mark and Joan LaNasa, 6515 <br />175th Street North, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow construction of a shared driveway on a <br />City road and utility easement. <br />The Associate Planner explained the applicant owns a 17 acre parcel with an existing home and a <br />vacant five -acre landlocked parcel to the north. There is a 33 -foot wide public road and utility <br />easement on the eastern portion of the property. The applicant was requesting approval to <br />construct the shared driveway on the easement. In addition to the CUP, the City Council would <br />need to approve an encroachment agreement to allow the use of the easement. The applicant <br />wanted to construct a new home on the land locked parcel. <br />Bailly asked if the current driveway was going to be vacated. The Associate Planner explained <br />the current driveway would still be used to access the existing home. The proposed driveway <br />would be for access to the landlocked parcel and is considered shared because it would cross <br />over the other parcel. <br />Schumann opened the public hearing. No one but the applicant was present to speak on the <br />request. Schumann closed the public hearing. <br />Bailly made motion, Moore seconded, to approve the CUP for LaNasa for a shared driveway. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.