Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />HUGO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />OCTOBER 11, 2007 <br />Call to Order <br />Chairman Schumann called the meeting to order at 7:02 p.m. <br />PRESENT: Bailly, Kleissler, McRoberts, Moore, Schumann (Moore arrived after roll call) <br />ABSENT: Weidt, Rosenquist <br />ALSO PRESENT: Bryan Bear, Community Development Director (CDD) <br />Michele Lindau, Secretary <br />Rachel Simone, Associate Planner <br />Kendra Lindahl, Planner <br />Approval of Minutes of September 27, 2007 <br />Schumann made motion, Bailly seconded, to approve the Planning Commission minutes of <br />September 27, 2007 as submitted. <br />All Ayes. Motion carried. <br />Storage of Large Recreational Vehicles <br />The Commission held a public hearing to consider a draft ordinance regulating the storage of <br />large recreational vehicles. The Associate Planner explained the Code Enforcement <br />Subcommittee, consisting of two Council members and three Planning Commission members, <br />had been working on a draft ordinance and held a public workshop in March 2007 where six <br />residents volunteered to join the subcommittee. The draft ordinance only applied to large <br />recreational vehicles, six feet in height and 18 feet in length, and exempted Agricultural, Long - <br />Term Agricultural, Rural Residential, and Future Urban Service Districts as well as lakeshore <br />properties. The ordinance also restricted where the vehicles could be parked, allowing parking in <br />the front yard provided it was on an established driveway, and on the side yard abutting a garage <br />no closer than one foot from the lot line. The Committee had also written a guide on the storage <br />of recreational vehicles. <br />Schumann opened the public hearing. <br />Michael Clyne, 14540 Geneva Avenue North, said he had contacted other cities inquiring on <br />their recreational vehicle ordinances and found most cities had tighter restrictions on lengths <br />allowed and setbacks from lot lines. He had concerns about the one -foot side yard setback <br />because of safety concerns accessing rear yards, and he said it encouraged loading and unloading <br />of the vehicles on neighboring property. <br />There were no other comments, and Schumann closed the public hearing. <br />