Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1988.10.26 PC Minutes/ HUGO PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES - October 26, 1988 The regular meeting of the Hugo Planning Commission was called to order by Chairman Senkler at 7:00PM. Gail Thoreson was sworn in as planning commissioner. PRESENT: Sullivan, Henry, Thoreson, Jesinski, Barnes, Senkler, Carole LaBelle, Administrator Huber Motion made by Henry, seconded by Sullivan to approve the minutes of September 28, 1988 as amended. All aye, motion passed. Chairman Senkler requested Administrator Huber review this request with the planning commission. Mr. Huber stated that Mr. Mike Lengyel and Mrs. Jeanette Pfurtscheller have made application to the City of Hugo for the subdivision of a 36 acre parcel of land plus an additional 10 acre outlot. This request has been reviewed by the planning commission on two previous occasions and has been tabled to October 26th. In reviewing the plat of Round Lake Addition there has been a number of major revisions since last reviewed by the planning commission. The primary roadway serving this development from Janero Ave. has been moved from the south border of the site to a location serving both outlot A and the balance of the subdivision. Although we have received a revised preliminary plat there was no explanation as to why the roadway was relocated. We can assume however, that it has something to do with the wetland areas and requirements of the Rice Creek Watershed District. The revised roadway location should eliminate some of the concerns noted by adjacent property owners at the previous continued public hearing. In reviewing the plat it appears that the lots meet minimum size and frontage on a public roadway. It should be noted, however, that the revised roadway will eliminate any possibility of connecting this subdivision development to County Rd. 10 in the future. If the planning commission recommends approval of this subdivision we would suggest said recommendation be subject to special conditions. Mr. Bill Simonet informed the audience that Steve Woods of the Rice Creek Watershed District required the change in the road location. Mr. Simonet stated that he has hired an engineer to address the roadway issue and they will remove the first roadway and return that area to its original condition. Mr. Mike Ball, Craig Breeder, and Ray Gatzow were concerned with the location of the proposed roadway. Mr. Ball indicated that the easement to the north is private and would like to see this easement closed when the roadway is installed. Mr. Huber informed Mr. Ball that this was a private issue and the city cannot dictate whether the easement continues to be used as access to County 10. Mr. Simonet agreed that the easement crossing Mr. Ball's property would be vacated when the roadway was installed. Mr. Ball questioned whether the lots could meet the 300' setback requirement and if Washington County reviewed the perc tests. P.C. Minutes - 10-26-88 page 2 Ms. Barnes felt there may not be a buildable site on Lot 1, Block 2 as most of the center of the lot was wetland. Mr. Simonet informed the commission that each lot did meet percolation requirements. Mr. Simonet also requested that the city waive the requirement of concrete curb and gutter in this development. Motion made by Senkler, seconded by Henry to recommend approval of the subdivision request for Mike Lengyel and Jeanette Pfurtscheller to subdivide 36 acres into 7 lots subject to the following special conditions: 1. The preliminary plat be submitted to the city council within 90 days of the commission's recommendation and the revised plat incorporate the recommendations of the staff, Rice Creek Watershed District, and other governmental agencies. 2. The preliminary plat will not be submitted to the council until all legal, engineering, and staff recommendations have been incorporated into the plat. 3. All fees relating to the subdivision shall be paid by the applicant including the cost of recording documents with Washington County. 4. Developer pay fee in lieu of parkland dedication at the time of final plat approval. 5. All street improvements shall be installed as per city design requirements and the cost of all on site improvements be borne by the developer. 6. A drainage plan including holding ponds and ditches must be approved by the watershed district and maintained by the property owner with the method of maintenance to be reviewed by the city engineer. 7. Internal roadway system shall be of bituminous surfacing with installation of curbing and approved and stormwater drainage. 8. All interior roadway signs shall be paid for by the developer. 9. Mailbox locations shall be approved by the United States postal service. 10. All development adjacent to the Round Lake shoreline shall be subject to the city's shoreland regulations. 11. Developer shall deposit with the city a certified check in an amount to cover the costs incurred by the city engineer for review, legal review, and administration of this request. Developer shall pay any cost incurred and the city shall reimburse the developer any remaining funds to cover the staff review ($2,000 recommended amount). 12. The developer shall reimburse the city for costs incurred for engineering inspection incurred during the course of roadway construction. 13. Restrictive covenants shall address maintenance and activities in the wetland area. Restrictive covenants shall also prohibit the construction of fences, buildings, or other vegetation in the wetlands. 14. Developer shall install one tree per lot of a minimal size within the subdivision development as per city regulations. 15. Approved driveways or drainage ways must include the installation of a minimum 15" diameter corrugated metal culvert acceptable to the city if required by the city building inspector. A P.C. Minutes - October 26, 1988 page 3 16. All applicable conditions of the preliminary plat and development agreement must be met prior to approval of the final plat by the city council. 17. The developer shall secure Rice Creek Watershed District approval of their on site drainage and erosion control plan prior to preliminary plat submittal to the city council. 18. The developer shall enter into a developers agreement with the City of Hugo as required for a development of this nature. The developer shall deposit with the city cash or a letter of credit equal to 125% of the cost of installing bituminous roadway to servce this subdivision. 19. Percolation tests must be completed on each of the buildable lots and must be submitted to the city for review prior to final plat approval. 20. Roadway design to be reviewed by city engineer. Layout to allow for proper slopes. Curb and gutter if needed for drainage and erosion. All aye, motion passed. Chairman Senkler requested Administrator Huber review the application with the planning commission. Mr. Huber stated that Mr. Dennis Fleischmann, Dora Lee, and Kevin Vacinek have made application to the City of Hugo for a special use permit to build and operate a concrete ornament manufacturing business in an industrial district. The property in question is one acre in size and is located south of 165th St. west of Highway 61. It is the applicants intent to construct a 36' X 66' building for manufacturing of products and provide for customer parking, exterior storage and a customer display area. The building in question will be served by on site well and septic system, as well as, telephone, electrical service and LP gas. The site plan indicates that a fence will be constructed to secure the east, south, and west borders of the site in question. The north border of the site will be secured by an existing fence. The use of the property in question as proposed by the applicant appears to be consistent with the intent of the city's zoning ordinance regarding industrial zones. If the planning commission recommends approval we would suggest that said recommendation be subject to special conditions. Area residents were concerned with noise and air pollution and inquired what part of the business would be conducted outside. Mr. Vacinek informed the audience that this business involved primarily the manufacture of concrete ornaments. Mr. Vacinek stated that all manufacturing is done inside with no noise or odors outside. Mr. Vacinek stated that all waste cement will be removed from the site and disposed of at an approved landfill. Mr. Vacinek also indicated that there will be a building on one lot and fenced storage where inventory will be stored on pallets and stacked neatly. Mr. Vacinek then stated there is no heating of the materials and would be no smoke stack. Mr. Senkler inquired how the material would be brought into the building. Mr. Vacinek stated all sand and rock is moved by hand, hopefully there would be a machine in the future. It was noted the the secured area would be a 6' chainlink fence securing approximately 2,000 pieces of merchandise. P.C. Minutes - October 26, 1988 Page 4 Jesinski made motion, seconded by Henry to recommend approval of the special use permit for Kevin Vacinek to construct a 36' X 66' and operate a concrete manufacturing business subject to the following special conditions: 1. Security lighting on site be designed such that it will not create glare or hazardous driving conditions for motor vehicles operating on 165th St. 2. Exterior storage on site, other than the customer display area, be properly secured and screened from the adjacent properties and Highway 61. 3. The site in question be developed as per the site plan. 4. All advertising on site be consistent with the city sign ordinance. 5. All customer and employee parking be located as shown on the approved site plan. 6. All driveways built over ditches or drainage areas must include the installation of 15" diameter corrugated metal culvert installed in a manner acceptable to the city building inspector. 7. The site must be policed and maintained on a regular basis with regard to litter and on site nuisances. G. No significant deviations from the approved site plan shall be permitted unless reviewed by the planning commission and city council followed by an amended special use permit. 9. Property lines must be identified on site by the petitioner to assure proper setbacks when buildings are constructed. 10. Any driveway permits requiring access to city or county roads must be secured prior to any on site construction. 11. No fences, structures, or vegetation may be placed in on site easements. 12. All activities on site shall not cause the altering of any watercouse, ditch, or drainage system. 13. Regular trash and refuse removal must be provided and utilized on a regular basis. 14. No materials, equipment, chemicals, or other items related to the manufacturing of these lawn ornaments may be buried on site without notifying the city and Washington County Dept. of Public Health. 15. The property owner shall permit reasonable access to the referenced site for periodic inspection by the city to assure conformance with the SUP. All activities on site must be in conformance with city codes and ordinances. 16. Failure to comply with the conditions of this special use permit shall be grounds for revocation of same. All aye, motion passed. Administrator Huber reviewed the application with the planning commissioners at Mr. Senkler's request. He stated that Ms. Ethelyn VanBeek and George Gotwald representing the Aspen Investment Co. have made application to the City of Hugo for the subdivision of a 69 acre tract of land into ten residential lots. The property in question is located off of Irish Ave. north of County Rd. 10 and northwest of Long Lake. The lots proposed range from 5.2 acres to 6.2 acres in size. The property is zoned RR2 and the applicant is requesting waiver of the subdivision requirement P.C. Minutes - Oct. 26, 1988 Page 5 regarding the length of cul-de-sacs (600' max.) permitted in subdivision developments. A public hearing has been scheduled for this evening to secure input regarding this property located in the southwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 in the southeast 1/4 of the northwest 1/4 of Section 35, T31N, R21W. The lots appear to meet theminimum lot size, lot width, and accommodate building setbacks. Aspen Investment Co. is also requesting that they [p[t be required to install curb and gutter in the development. If the planning commission acts to recommend approval of this subdivision we would suggest that said recommendation be subject to special conditions. Mr. Huber stated that the city engineer was concerned about the roadway design. The city engineer has requested that a preliminary road design be submitted to him for review. Chairman Senkler requested comments from the public. Mr. Dennis Weiman inquired whether the location of road on the plat was precise and stated that he would like to see the proposed roadway adjoing Irish Ave. at a location directly between the two houses that currently face the proposed roadway. Other residents shared concerns regarding the location of the proposed roadway at its intersection with Irish Ave. and that it could create a hazard because of the grade on Irish and the increased traffic on the road. Mr. J. Guthrie wondered of the cul de sac on the north border of the property would provide access to his property on the north. Mr. Huber stated the roadway is public but does not necessarily open his property for development. Commissioner Barnes stated that the Irish Ave. hill would be addressed by the city engineer and grades in that area may be changed. Ms. Barnes would like to see plans for the extension of the roadway to the north. Dick Senkler inquired whether the watershed district would address private driveways over the wetlands area. Mr. Senkler stated the city would rely on the recommendation of the city engineer regarding the issue of concrete curb and gutter. Mr. George Gotwald stated they would provide the necessary changes to allow for the extension of the roadway to the north. Motion made by Barnes, seconded by Thoreson to recommend approval of the Country View Acres preliminary plat subject to the following special conditions: 1. The preliminary plat be submitted to the city council within 90 days of the commission's recommendation and the revised plat incorporate the recommendations of the staff, Rice Creek Watershed District, and other governmental agencies. 2. The preliminary plat will not be submitted to the council until all legal, engineering, and staff recommendations have been incorporated into the plat. 3. All fees relating to the subdivision shall be paid by the applicant including the cost of recording documents with Washington County. 4. Developer pay fee in lieu of parkland dedication at the time of final plat approval. 5. All street improvements shall be installed as per city design requirements and the cost of all on site improvements be borne by the developer. 6. A drainage plan including holding ponds and ditches must be approved by the watershed district and maintained by the property owner with the method of maintenance to be reviewed by the city engineer. P.C. Minutes - October 265 1988 pAqe 6 7. Internal roadway system shall be of bituminous surfacing with installation of curbing and approved and stormwater drainage. 8. All interior roadway signs shall be paid for by the developer. 9. Mailbox locations shall be approved by the United States postal service. 10. All development adjacent to the Long Lake shoreline shall be subject to the city's shoreland regulations. 11. Developer shall deposit with the city a certified check in an amount to cover the costs incurred by the city engineer for review, legal review, and administration of this request. Developer shall pay any cost incurred and the city shall reimburse the developer any remaining funds to cover the staff review ($2,000 recommended amount). 12. The developer shall reimburse the city for costs incurred for engineering inspection incurred during the course of roadway construction. 13. Restrictive covenants shall address maintenance and activities in the wetland area. Restrictive covenants shall also prohibit the construction of fences, buildings, or other vegetation in the wetlands. 14. Developer shall install one tree per lot of a minimal size within the subdivision development as per city regulations. 15. Approved driveways or drainage ways must include the installation of a minimum 15" diameter corrugated metal culvert acceptable to the city if required by the city building inspector, 16. All applicable conditions of the preliminary plat and development agreement must be met prior to approval of the final plat by the city council. 17. The developer shall secure Rice Creek Watershed District approval of their on site drainage, erosion control plan prior to preliminary plat submittal to the city council. 18. The developer shall enter into a developers agreement with the City of Hugo as required for a development of this nature. The developer shall deposit with the city cash or a letter of credit equal to 125% of the cost of installing bituminous roadway to servce this subdivision. 19. Percolation tests must be completed on each of the buildable lots and must be submitted to the city for review prior to final plat approval. 20. Preliminary road design submitted to county engineer before this subdivision goes to the city council and address the visibility for access onto Irish Ave. 21. Additional right of way on Lot 3, block 1 for roadway extension to the north at a future date. All aye, motion passed. Minor Subdivision (Francis Lutz Administrator Huber reviewed the application with the planning commission. Mr. Francis Lutz and Mr. Mark Lutz have made application to the City of- Hugo fHugo for subdivision of a 39,5 acre tract of land into three lots in an agricultural zoning district, The property in question is generally described as the northeast 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 of Section 15, T31N, R21W. Parcel A of the enclosed survey reflects the existing farm site on 19.5 acres, a proposed building site on Parcel B, and a future building site on Parcel C. The applicants have requested waiver of the formal P.C. Minutes - October 26, 1988 pRqe 7 platting procedure. The property in question is located at the northwest corner of 157th St. and Ingersoll Ave. No. The lot size and width appear to be consistent with the city zoning requirements and the proposed use of the property, as explained by the applicant, appears to be consistent with the land use for this area as defined in the comprehensive plan. If the planning commission chooses to recommend approval of this subdivision to the city council we would suggest that said recommendation be subject to special conditions. Chairman Senkler requested comments from the public. No one from the audience responded. Administrator Huber stated that the subdivision would be reivewed by the Rice Creek Watershed District and drainage easements would be addressed at that time. The planning commission felt this a reasonable request and had no concerns regarding this subdivision. Motion made by Sullivan, seconded by Barnes to recommend approval of the minor subdivision request and waiver of the formal platting procedure for Mark and Francis Lutz subject to the following special conditions: 1. The preliminary survey be submitted to the city council within 90 days of the commission's recommendation and the revised survey incorporate the recommendations of the staff, Rice Creek Watershed District, and other governmental agencies. 2. The preliminary survey will not be submitted to the council until all legal, engineering, and staff recommendations have been incorporated into the survey. 3. All fees relating to the subdivision shall be paid by the applicant including the cost of recording documents with Washington County. 4. Developer pay fee in lieu of parkland dedication at the time of final survey approval. 5. A drainage plan including holding ponds and ditches must be approved by the watershed district and maintianed by the property owner with the method of maintenance to be reviewed by the city engineer. 6. Mailbox locations shall be approved by the United States Postal service. 7. Developer shall install one tree per lot of a minimal size within the subdivison development as per city regulations. S. Approved driveways or drainage ways must include the installation of a minimum 15" diameter, corrugated metal culvert acceptable to the city if required by the city building inspector.. 9. The developer shall secure Rice Creek Watershed District approval of their on site drainage plan prior to approval of the final survey by the city council. 10. Percolation tests must be completed on each of the buildable lots and must be submitted to the city for review prior to final survey approval. 11. Lot lines within the subdivision must be identified to determine proper building setbacks if required by the building inspector. All aye, motion passed. P.C. Minutes - October 26, 1988 , pAe 8 Mr. Senkler requested Mr. Huber review the application with the planning commission. Mr. Huber stated that Vern and Marie Peloquin have made application to the City of Hugo for a minor subdivision for the purpose of creating a parcel of land adjacent to Peloquin Industrial Park in an Industrial zone. The property in question is generally described as a 1.7 acre tract of land located in that part of the west 1/2 of the southwest 1/4 of Section 17, T31N, R21W, Hugo, Minnesota. The Peloquin Industrial Park has a confusing history and the city staff has spent considerable time trying to recreate the piece meal subdivision of this industrial area. Dating back to 1974 Mr. Vern Peloquin has subdivided various tracts of an industrial zoned area of land on a lot by lot basis which has resulted in the creation of what is now known as the Peloquin Industrial Park. All of the minor subdivisions have been done by Mr. Peloquin with the exception of the plat of Husnik's Industrial Park which consisted of five lots that were subdivided by formal plat. The park in question has gravel roads and no municipal sewer or water. Because of the manner in which this land was subdivided, a formal plat Was not created, therefore, the requirements of the formal platting process were not adhered to. All sites under 5 acres in size were not reviewed by the Rice Creek Watershed District and therefore much of this development occurred without their review. In 1981 the city received a letter from the watershed district indicating that any further subdivision in the Peloquin Industrial Park, regardless of the lot size, must be submitted to the district because of the impact on the adjacent Clearwater Creek. In reviewing Mr. Peloquin's initial request the staff strongly recommended that this subdivision be done by formal plat including all acreage owned by Mr. Peloquin within the industrial area that currently is not platted. Although Mr. Peloquin notes in his September 23, 1988, letter that there is no more land available, Mr. Peloquin does own several tracts of land identified on the composite map that have not been subdivided to date. Mr. Peloquin has chosen however, to again subdivide this area by minor subdivision and continue the piece meal development approach in this area. It is extremely difficult to evaluate this parcel as it has developed without the typical plat amenities because of the minor subdivision approach. If the planning commission recommends approval of this minor subdivision and waiver of the formal platting requirements we would recommend that said approval be subject to special conditions. Mr. Peloquin stated that the proposed subdivision would be used by American Structural Steel as storage space for their trucks. He also stated that Rice Creek Watershed is requiring a 50' easement on the west portion of the property in the industrial park and he has refused to grant them the easement. Chairman Senkler requested public comments. Mr. Joe Marier was concerned that this subdivision would deny him access to his property on the east and no provisions for easements or roadways have been addressed. Commissioners Barnes and Senkler were concerned that there is no overall picture of the drainage plan or if there is a specific drainage plan for the industrial park, what permits if any have been issued. Mr. Senkler- inquired enklerinquired whether it was appropriate to require a formal plat for one lot. Administrator Huber stated they could require a formal plat for one lot and deny waiver of the formal platting process. It was noted that former P.C. Minutes - October 28, 1988 9 officials had apparently informed Mr. Peloquin that no further subdivision would be allowed without a formal plat, however, there are no documents to that effect. Mr. Senkler felt this subdivision could have an effect on adjacent property and would like to see the best possible development of the remaining area. Commissioner Barnes stated the they should address the drainage problems which may already exist and there is no way to do this on one small lot. Motion made by Senkler, seconded by Barnes to recommend to deny the waiver of the formal platting procedure of the subdivision request of Vern Peloquin and request that Rice Creek Watershed District review the entire area owned by Mr. Peloquin in the industrial zone not just the proposed lot. Members voting AYE: Jesinski, Barnes, Thoreson, Senkler Members voting NAY: Sullivan, Henry Motion passed. Chairman Senkler requested Administrator Huber reviw the application with the planning commission. Mr. Huber stated Jennie and Melvin Vietor have made application to the City of Hugo for the subdivision of a 19.84 acre tract of land into residential parcels in an agricultural zoning district. The property in question is located on the east side of Jeffrey Ave. in part of the east 1/2 of the southeast 1/4 of Section 11, T31N, R21W, Washington County, Minnesota. The tract of land located south the parcel B is owned by another party and the tract of land located north of parcel A is owned by Mrs. Vietor. The applicant has requested waiver of the square footage requirement for Parcel B and lot width for Parcel B because the easement north of Parcel A, and building locations, restrict the size of the site. Apparently the access easement north of parcel A is a fenced area and it might create some difficulty if the property line was moved from the proposed location. If the planning commission recommends approval of this subdivision to the city council we would suggest that said recommendation be subject to special conditions. There was no one from the public to comment on the subdivision request. Mr. Melvin Vietor stated the property is to be subdivided and sold to pay for nursing home care for Jennie Vietor. It was acknowledged that the 300' lot width at the setback line could be maintained on parcel B. Motion made by Sullivan, seconded by Jesinski to recommend approval of the subdivision for Melvin and Jennie Vietor subject to the following special conditions: 1. The preliminary survey be submitted to the city council within 90 days of the commission's recommendation and the revised survey incorporate the recommendations of the staff, Rice Creek Watershed District, and other governmental agencies. 2. The preliminary survey will not be submitted to the council until all legal, engineering, and staff recommendations have been incorporated into the survey. 3. All fees relating to the subdivision shall be paid by the applicant including the cost of recording documents with Washington County. 4. Developer pay fee in lieu of parkland dedication at the time of final survey approval., P.C. Minutes - October 26, 1988 5. A drainage plan including holding ponds and ditches must be approved by the watershed district and maintianed by the property owner with the method of maintenance to be reviewed by the city engineer. 6. Mailbox locations shall be approved by the United States Postal service. 7. Developer shall install one tree per lot of a minimal size within the subdivison development as per city regulations. S. Approved driveways or drainage ways must include the installation of a minimum 15" diameter, corrugated metal culvert acceptable to the city if required by the city building inspector.. 9. The developer shall secure Rice Creek Watershed District approval of their on site drainage plan prior to approval of the final survey by the city council. 10. Percolation tests must be completed on each of the buildable lots and must be submitted to the city for review prior to final survey approval. 11. Lot lines within the subdivision must be identified to determine proper building setbacks if required by the building inspector. All aye, motion passed. Mr. Fred Macalus has made application to the City of Hugo for the rezoning of a 12.6 acre tract of land from conservancy to agricultural. The property in question is located west of Foxhill Ave. approximately 1400 ft. south of 180th. The rezoning in question would allow for subdivision of the property into 3 parcels, one consisting of 42.74 acres and the others of 9.9 and 9.8 acres. Currently tracts A and C are in two different zoning district and it is the applicants intent to have both of these tracts zoned agricultural. Mr. Macalus had applied for a rezoning of the entire tract to agricultural at an earlier date and the planning commission recommended denial of the rezoning. Mr. Macalus has revised his request in an effort to clear up the mixed zoning problems and allow for the conveyance of tract C in a manner acceptable to the mortgage company. The area located north of tract C is currently zoned agricultural and the area south of tract C will remain conservancy. Planning Commission members concurred that the rezoning proposal was satisfactory in that it did not include the entire area surrounding the creek. There was no one from the public to comment on this request. Motion made by Sullivan, seconded by Thoreson to recommend approval of the rezoning request of Fred and Mary Ellen Macalus as submitted. All aye, motion passed. Administrator Huber reviewed the application with the planning commission at Chairman Senkler's request. Mr. Huber stated that Fred and Mary Macalus have made application to the City of Hugo for the subdivision of a 62 acre tract of land into 2, ten acre tracts, and one 42.7 acre tract. The property in question is zoned agricultural and conservancy. Pending the rezoning of this property it is the intent of Mr. Macalus to convey , X.C. Minutes - Oct. 26, 1988 )page 11 tract C as shown on the survey to his son. All of the tracts in question have frontage on a public roadway and meet lot width requirements. Mr. Macalus is requesting a variance from the formal platting procedure and ten acre requirement to allow for a lot slightly under 10 acres. If the planning commission recommends approval of this subdivision to the city council we would suggest said recommendation be subject to special conditions. Commission member concurred this was an appropriate use of the land and had no objections to the proposed subdivision. There was no one from the public to comment. Thoreson made motion, second by Henry to recommend approval of the subdivision request and waiver of the formal platting procedure for Fred and Mary Ellen Macalus to subdivide 62 acres into a 9.9 acre tract, 9.8 acre tract and one 42.7 acre parcel subject to the following special conditions: 1. The preliminary survey be submitted to the city council within 90 days of the commission's recommendation and the revised survey incorporate the recommendations of the staff, Rice Creek Watershed District, and other governmental agencies. 2. The preliminary survey will not be submitted to the council until all legal, engineering, and staff recommendations have been incorporated into the survey. 3. All fees relating to the subdivision shall be paid by the applicant including the cost of recording documents with Washington County., 4. Developer pay fee in lieu of parkland dedication at the time of final survey approval. 5. A drainage plan including holding ponds and ditches must be approved by the watershed district and maintianed by the property owner with the method of maintenance to be reviewed by the city engineer. 6. Mailbox locations shall be approved by the United States Postal service. 7. Developer shall install one tree per lot of a minimal size within the subdivison development as per city regulations. G. Approved driveways or drainage ways must include the installation of a minimum 15" diameter, corrugated metal culvert acceptable to the city if required by the city building inspector. 9. The developer shall secure Rice Creek Watershed District approval of their on site drainage plan prior to approval of the final survey by the city council. 10. Percolation tests must be completed on each of the buildable lots and must be submitted to the city for review prior to final survey approval. 11. Lot lines within the subdivision must be identified to determine proper building setbacks if required by the building inspector. All aye, motion passed. Administrator Huber informed the planning commission that the Bald Eagle Sportsmans Assoc. had recently made some major safety improvements at their club. It was noted that the club has been subject to an annual review by the commission for some time. Commissioners concurred that an PrC. Minutes - October 26, 1988 1page 12 annual review seems to be an unnecessary process for all involved. Motion made by Senkler, seconded by Henry to recommend to the city council that the special use permit for the Bald Eagle Sportsman be reviewed only when changes in use are proposed or when violations of the permit are recieved by the city. All aye, motion passed. Motion made by Senkler, seconded by Henry to adjourn at 9:50PM. All aye, motion passed. Carole LaBelle, LaBelle, 8ecretary Hugo Planning Commission