HomeMy WebLinkAbout1981.03.25 PC MinutesMINUTES OF THE PROCEEDINGS
OF THE
HUGO PLANNING COMMISSION
March 25, 1981
The meeting was called to order by Chairwoman Theodora Peltier at 8:03 PM.
PRESENT: Peloquin, Hanson, Greger, Lorch, Peltier
ABSENT: Fashingbauer and Knuteson
Motion made by Hanson, seconded by Greger, to approve the minutes of March 11,
1981, after the following correction has been made:
Page 1 - (Otto) Mr. Otto stated that the large barn would not support much hay
All aye. Motion Carried.
BALD EAGLE SPORTSMAN ASSN - ANNUAL REVIEW OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT
Mr. Arthur Timm, president of the association, was present, and submitted
a listing of the club's current officers, along with the following requests:
1. Open 2 hours later on August 29, 1981 for club Trap Championship Shoot -off,
in exchange for closing of 2 hours earlier on following day, August 30.
2. Open all Sundays in October in preparation of hunting season, in exchange
for closing of club for all of December and January.
The second request was asked for because of a substantial increase in real estate
taxes. The additional Sundays would alleviate the money problem somewhat. Mr.
Timm stated that he had taken a random canvas of 125th Street and Goodview Avenue,
and have statements that the additional Sundays wopld offer no problem to them.
Mrs. Axelson was present and stated that she hadMen contacted by any one. She
was not in favor of the consecutive Sundays in'October. Mr. Timm apologized to
Mrs. Axelson for not seeking her comments, but felt that because of her continual
negative response regarding activities at the club, did not feel anything would
change.
Motion made by Hanson, seconded by Lorch, to recommend approval of the request
to extend the hours of operation on August 29, 1981, from a closing at 6:00 PM
to a closing of 8:00 PM in exchange for a closing on August 30, 1981, at 4:00 PM
instead of 6:00 PM, and denial of the request of consecutive Sundays in October.
All aye. Motion Carried.
Mr. Timm did not feel two Sundays additional out of 52 was an unreasonable request.
He stated the club would also consider relinquishing hours in February in order
to be given approval for the additional Sundays in October. Mr. Timm was advised
that he could present his case to the City Council on April 6, 1981. Planning
Commission members will make an on-site inspection of the area on April 4, at
1:30 PM.
�,i,,,..--.::-...:.-�arsr►..�.R+ss•.+.,,..,.Aw��w►�.u.�.w.�-....,.,,,..w, ........ •.>.-,ew�....�--..�_-...._.... ,., .: .... c•'.�,-•-.-,mac .«..., .. .. ....._. - -- - -'rr �•
Hugo Planning Commission
March 25, 1981
Page 2 Of 5
ZIMMCO WOOD - ANNUAL REVIEW OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT
Tom Zimmerman was present, and discussed his request that the 24 x 24 garage
located on the property be considered as a permanent structure. The building
has served their purpose as of this time, and still have plans for the con-
struction of a new building within the next year or two. The Planning Commission
determined that it would be to the city's gdvantage to grant an extension to
Item 1 of the Special Use Permit rathe,W- lacing the garage a permanent structure.
Motion made by Greger, seconded by Peloquin, for the continuance of the Special
Use Permit for Zimmco Wood for another year, with the following modifications:
r ,
1. A 24 x 24 garage be allowed to be placed on the property for a period
not to exceed four (4) years from the date of the Special Use Permit. At
that time, the building to be constructed in accordance with the plans
submitted, and so positioned relative to perc test that a valid Building
Permit can be obtained.
2. Item 2 - eliminate
3. Item 3 - eliminate
4. Dust suppression measures shall be installed at the expense of the permit
holder to protect those residences existing along the haul route. (eliminate
the word temporary)
5. Item 5 - remain the smae
6. Item 6 - remain the same `
7. Permit holder shall provide a bond in the amount o� $5.,000.00, in favor of
the City of Hugo, to guarantee compliance with Iieer�� and 4 of the Special
Use Permit. Bond should also guarantee removal of the 24 x 24 garage within
four ( 4 ) years of the date of the permit.
8. Item 8 - remain the same
9. Item 9 should remain with new dates as determined by the City Council.
All aye. Motion Carried.
PAUL RICE - SITE PLAN APPROVAL
Mr. Rice, 12743 Keller Avenue, owns 61 acres in the Conservancy zone, and would
like to construct a 30 x 50 pole barn for his personal use. The existing driveway
would be used. 11
Motion made by Peltier, seconded by Peloquin, to recommen�%o?VtAe Site Plan for
Paul Rice to construct a 30 x 50 pole barn to be used for personal storage.
All aye. Motion Carried.
,yam._.._. .M...:..,:. w.�e�p,•aa rl...,.,., s ... ,..w,...
• ••:.:- i'�"'i5..'rF�YM�rI'I'..o11V/+�t�wM.'�1MRiM�i'OPv �,
Hugo Planning Commission
March 25, 1981
Page 3 of 5
LEONARD KIJENSKI - SITE PLAN APPROVAL AND VARIANCE
Mr. Kijenski, 14244 Hyde Avenue, owns 21 acres in the Agricultural zone, and
would like to construct a 30 x 32 pole barn for his personal use. The building
would be located closer to the front lot line than the principal building, but
will not be visible from the road because of the trees.
Motion made by Greger, seconded by Lorch, to recommend approval of the Variance
for Leonard Kijenski, to construct an accessory building closer to the front
lot line than the principal building.
All aye. Motion Carried.
Motion made by Peloquin, seconded by Greger, to recommend approval of the Site
Plan for Leonard Kijenski, to construct a 30 x 32 pole barn to be used for
his personal storage.
All aye. Motion Carried.
RONALD REICHSTADT SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND VARIANCE
Mr. Riechstadt, 12768 Irish Avenue, awns approximately 5 acres in the RRII zone,
and would like to construct a 30 x 60 pole barn to be used for his personal
storage. There is a 13 x 36 loafing shed located on the property, therefore,
creating the necessity for a Special Use Permit (1800 sq ft maximum allowed).
Mr. Reichstadt would be establishing a new driveway to the proposed barn, and
would be required to make application for a Driveway Permit.
Motion made by Greger, seconded by Hanson, to table the request until the
meeting of April 8, 1981, so the Planning Commission members can acquaint
themselved withthe property.
All aye. Motion Carried.
RICHARD VAIL - VARIANCES
The Planning_Commission reviewed the new plan as submitted by Richard Vail on
March 25, 1981.
Motion made by Greger, seconded by Peltier, to recommend denial of the Variance
request of Richard Vail to change the lot depth from 130' to 88' and lot width
from 100' to 86' for Lot 1, Shamrock Glen.
All aye. Motion Carried.
Greger stated that mo�tiou-for denim etas made because corner lot should be e -m -
side -ed -wider d one person i66 expressed concern about that
,k p p particular lot
at the public aria its CV a -t,
Motion made by Greger, seconded by Peltier, to recommend denial of the Variance
request of Richard Vail to change the lot depth of Lot 2, Shamrock Glen, from
130' to 881.
All aye. Motion Carried.
Recommendation for denial because of one person who expressed concern about that
lot at the public hearing.
Hugo Planning Commission
March 25, 1981
Page 4 of 5
Richard Vail - cont.
Motion made by Peloquin, seconded by Peltier, to recommend approval of the Variance
request of Richard Vail to bypass the requirement for concrete and install
rolled bituminous curb, in the Shamrock Glen subdivision.
All aye. Motion Carried.
Motion :Wade by Peloquin, seconded by Peltier, to recommend approval of the Variance
request of Richard Vail to bypass the requirement for sidewalks in the Shamrock
Glen subdivision.
Lorch inquired why the developer should not be required to install sidewalks.
Hanson stated that because the street is going to be used for drainage purposes
may be the city should be looking at a sidewalk on one side or some kind of
walkway be provided.
Peloquin withdrew his motion.
Motion made by Hanson, seconded by Larch, to recommend denial of the Variance
request of Richard Vail to bypass the requirement to install sidewalks in the
Shamrock Glen subdivision.
All aye. Motion Carried.
Motion made by Hanson, seconded by Peloquin, thet thf. City Council consider a
variance from the normal sidewalk requirementsitit�`c(rnsideration be given to
some sort of pedestrian, hard -surfaced walkway.
All aye. Motion Carried.
MARLOWE LINDAU - SUBDIVISION
Motion made by Peloquin, seconded by Greger, to add Marlowe Lindau to the agenda
for all purposes.
All aye. Motion Carried.
The City Council has determined that Mr. Lindau should plat his property rather
than divide by metes and bounds. Mr. Lindau could then create the four parcels
as initially requested, leaving the larger balance of land to be designated
Outlot A. Then if Mr. Lindau would ever desire to divide that portion of land,
Minor Subdivision would be appropriate. Mr. Koercher's property was part of
the original farm now awned by Lindau, and Peloquin felt that this parcel should
be included in the platting. It was also suggested that a petition should be
filed with the city to extend city water to Lindau's property, because of the
close proximity of the water to be installed for the Shamrock Glen subdivision.
Mr. Lindau was provided with an application of subdivision along with a sub-
division checklist. Mr. Lindau was also informed that permits will be required
from Rice Creek Watershed and the DNR.
VERN PELOQUIN - MINOR SUBDIVISION
Miscellaneous Metals is now ready to construct the balance of the building to
be located on Lot 10, Block 4, Peloquin Industrial Park. Mr. Riermann had
previously been given approval to install footings only, and final approval
Hugo Planning Commission
March 25, 1981
Page 5 of 5
could not be granted until Mr. Peloquin received final plat approval of his
subdivision. A permit would be required from Rice Creek Watershed, on an in-
dividual basis, for any improvements in the park. The platting procedure has
not been completed at this time, so to accommodate Mr. Riermann's request,
Minor Subdivision is the only route available.
Motion made by Hanson, seconded by Greger, that the Planning Commission pass the
request of Vern Peloquin for a Minor Subdivision in the Peloquin Industrial Park
onto the City Council without recommendation due to the circumstances involved
with the final plat.
VOTING FOR: Hanson, Greger, Lorch, Peltier
ABSTAINED: Peloquin
Motion Carried.
Motion made by Greger, seconded by Hanson, to adjourn at 10:59 PM.
All aye. Motion Carried.
�I �i
Mary An r✓ reager, Secretary
Hugo P1 nning Commission