HomeMy WebLinkAbout2012.09.26 Parks PacketCopies to:
I. 7:00pm
II. 7:02pm
III. 7:05pm
IV. 8:25pm
V. 9:00pm
Agenda
Parks Commission, City of Hugo
September 26, 2012
7:00 pm
Oneka Room, City Hall
Commission Members, City Staff
Approve Minutes From August 8, 2012 Meeting
Agenda Review
Presentation of the Lions Park Preliminary Master Plan
LaValle Properties Park Dedication
Adjournment
Next Meeting - October 10, 2012
-1-
Parks Commission
September 26, 2012
Background Memo
Approve Minutes From August 8, 2012 Meeting
Staff recommends approval of the minutes from the August 8, 2012 Parks
Commission meeting.
II. Agenda Review
In the summer of 2011, the Parks Commission began gathering public input to
put together a master plan for Lions Park. At the Parks Commission meeting of
September 26, 2012, Brauer and Associates will make a presentation of a
Preliminary Master Plan and gather feedback from stakeholders, public and the
Parks Commission. Following the discussion on the Lions Park Master Plan, the
Parks Commission will be asked to provide feedback on a development adjacent
to the Lions Park. The developer is seeking informal feedback on park
dedication options, including expansion of the park, prior to applying for a formal
review of the potential development.
III. Presentation of the Lions Park Preliminary Master Plan
Amanda Prosser, Landscape Architect from WSB & Associates, formerly Brauer
& Associates will present the Lions Park Preliminary Master Plan. The
Preliminary Master Plan includes an outline of next steps: schematic design,
design development and preparation of construction documents prior to
construction. Prosser will gather feedback from the public, stakeholders and the
Parks Commission. Staff recommends that a recommendation be made to the
City Council for approval of the Lions Park Master Plan with revisions as
discussed.
IV. LaValle Properties Park Dedication
Planning Intern Liz Hanson and Parks Planner Shayla Syverson will make a
presentation about a potential development and park dedication for properties
owned by Marvin LaValle located immediately west of Lions Park. The
Developer, Bill Lensch, will be present to gather feedback from the Parks
Commission on park dedication options prior to applying for formal approval of
the proposed residential development.
-2-
Parks Commission
September 26, 2012
I
Minutes
Parks Commission, City of Hugo
August 8, 2012
7:00 P.M.
Council Chambers, City Hall
Call to Order
Present: Kris Birch, Joan Benner, Rachel Berger, Chris Boland, Roger Clarke, Mat
Rauschendorfer, Dave Strub, Jim Taylor, Tom Windisch
Staff Present: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director
Shayla Syverson, Parks Planner
Debi Close, Secretary
Jim Taylor called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m.
I. Approval of Minutes from June Meeting
Strub made a motion, Windisch seconded to approve the minutes of the June 13, 2012 Parks
Commission meeting.
U. Lions Park Master Planning Update
Parks Planner, Shayla Syverson gave an update on the stakeholder meeting held on
Wednesday July 11`h, 2012 the Lions Park master plan. Prior to the Parks Commission
meeting, stakeholders gave feedback on three concept plans prepared and presented by
Amanda Prosser of WSB & Associates. The next steps in master planning Lions Park include
compiling the feedback and preparing a single preliminary master plan for review.
Parks Commission agreed to change the next commission meeting date to incorporate the
feedback from the August 8'h, 2012 stakeholder meeting.
III. Presentation from Tori Gabrielson
Tori Gabrielson addressed the commission requesting a neighborhood park for the kids that live
north of the Hugo Fire Hall. Her presentation included giving more options for good choices to
the teens in her neighborhood.
Taylor discussed that the Hardwood Creek Tail will be extended South to 140`" in 2014 which
will provide a safe way to access nearby parks. Taylor thanked Gabrielson for bringing this
issue to the Parks Commission. Commissioners agreed that this need will continue to be
remembered in future goal setting and planning efforts and residential development continues in
the area.
Parks commission members commended Tori for all the work put into the request and for
bringing this need to their attention.
IV. Recreation Program Updates
Parks Planner, Shayla Syverson updated with on all current and upcoming recreation events.
Park play dates running June 19`h through July 26th. Parks hosting included Diamond Point,
Arbre, Beaver Ponds and Oak Shore. The activities had solid participation and trends were
recognized in attendance subject to weather, location and time. Next summer there will be
additional advertising including more flyers and Facebook to get the word out.
Skyhawk's Sports Camp was held August 13 — 16th 2012. Sixteen kids signed up and played
T -ball, basketball and soccer. The Flag Football Camp, geared towards older youth, was
cancelled due to small registration numbers.
Kidcreate Studio's Art Camps will be on August 21 — 27th, 2012. Camps include Cuddly Critters,
Angry Birds, App art for ipod/phones and a PJ Art Party.
Tour de Hugo will be on September 15th, 2012. Sponsors are excited for the event with $1200.
in donations received so far. The bike safety rodeo will be included this year and rides are
mapped out to be 5, 18 and 26 mile courses.
Movie Night in the Park September 14, 2012 at sunset showing How to Eat Fried Worms.
Games will start at 7:OOpm and snacks will be provided for the movie.
V. Adjournment
Windisch made a motion, Strub seconded to adjourn the meeting at 8:40 pm.
All Aye.
BRAUER & AssOCIATEs, LTD.
Lions Park Master Plan Project
City of Hugo, MN
August 8, 2012
Concept Review Meeting Summary
Overview: The preliminary concept review open house meeting for the Lions Park planning process was
attended by approximately 10 people. The goal of the meeting was to determine the amenities desired
and the preferred arrangements of the various features. There was good discussion among the participants
with most of the audience contributing to the conversation. Overall, Concept #3 was preferred which
focuses on an organic shape and having one large building that supports kitchen, restrooms, storage,
picnicking cover, etc. It also allows for a large open space for informal ball games or events. Some of the
main topics covered at the meeting included:
I. Main Park Building
1. One main park building should be included that has enough space to accommodate a kitchen,
restrooms, Lions storage and has covered space for summer picnic use and winter skating.
2. Further exploration into size requirements will be made along with researching manufactured
buildings that could be modified for these requirements.
3. The building location works well with future development to the west - building could serve
both users.
11. Neighborhood Recreation Area
1. The neighborhood active recreation area should also include hardcourt space for 1/2 court
basketball. This could be placed adjacent to the skate park area as these two activities usually
relate to older kids.
2. The skate park should be located in a highly -visible area of the park.
3. A backstop should be included within the open lawn space. However, a defined ball field
should not be included.
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MNS5416
III. Parking / Circulation
1. Fitzgerald should be closed off with drop-off areas for City Hall and the park.
2. A combination of bump out parking spaces along the street and parking lots within the park
should be incorporated.
3. Lawn space for large -event parking should be allowed for.
4. Direct connections between the parking lot and the shelter should be considered.
5. The continuity between City Hall and the park is important and this element should be
incorporated into the final plan.
6. Promoting pedestrian connections to the surrounding neighborhood and regional trail will be
important as the city grows.
7. The use of large trucks during events should be acknowledged and accommodated, as best able
to, in the design of the park master plan.
IV. Misc. Items
1. The concert -style seating area was well -accepted and allows for flexible use of the space when
performances are not taking place.
2. The idea of a portable tent was not well-received as shown in Concept #1 ft #2.
3. A water feature should be incorporated either at the main park / city hall entrance or at the
performance stage area.
4. There is still some debate whether a raised stage for a portable 'show -mobile' should be
included or if a permanent structure should be built with a raised stage. This is something that
could easily be phased in over time should the demand warrant a permanent structure.
701 Xenia Avenue South, Suite 300
Minneapolis, MN 55416
Preliminary Master Plan Cost Estimate
Lions Park - City of Hugo, MN
September 26, 2012
Brauer & Associates, Ltd.
Project #1904-390
This cost estimate defines the estimated costs associated with each component of the master plan update for Lions Park. It is based on a combination
of site-specific development requirements and projects of similar size and complexity. These estimated costs are also based on having the work
completed by private contractors and specialists. It does not take into consideration work that could be performed by City staff, volunteer groups, or
by other means.
The cost figures are based on master plan level evaluation, which brings with it inherent limitations. The cost figures are meant for general budgeting
proposes, project phasing, and comparing the relative cost of one item to that of another. The costs are in 2012 dollars. Although intended to be
conservative, actual costs will vary depending on the year that each aspect of the master plan is implemented, implementation parameters, economic
conditions affecting bidding, and unexpected site conditions found in the field during construction.
Park Ira roxement Description
coat Range Estimate
#
1 - Removals, Earthwork and Surveying
Low
High
1
Removals
30,000.00
34,500.00
2
JEarthwork operations (including erosion control)
40,000.00
46,000.00
3
ISuiveving
10000.00
11,500.00
Estimated Subtotal (includes 10% contingency and 15% testing, cd's and surveyingfees)
$100,000.00
$115,000.00
#
2 - Utilities, Lighting and Irrigation Improvements
Low
High
1
Utility adjustments
30,000.00
34,500.00
2
General Lighting Improvements and electrical upgrades (budget)
200,000.00
230,000.00
3
Irrigation modifications and expansion bud et
50 000.00
57 500.00
Estimated Subtotal (includes 10% contingency and 15% testing, ed's, and surveying fees)
$350,000.00
$402,500.00
#
3 -Park Improvements
Low
High
1
4" thick concrete pavement
23,000.00
26,450.00
2
Event vehicular access points (concrete apron and walkway)
31,200.00
35,880.00
3
As haltnail
137,500.00
158,125.00
4
Parking lot improvements (includes pavement, curbing, striping and signage)
100,000.00
115,000.00
5
Asphalt parking bays with concrete curb and gutter
70,000.00
80,500.00
6
1/2 court basketball with striping
10,000.00
11,500.00
7
Skate Park (includes concrete pavement, 6'high fencing, and relocation of equipment)
55,000.00
63,250.00
8
Fountain wall
63,000.00
72,450.00
9
Decorative fountain (budget)
20,000.00
23 000.00
10
Trash receptacle
9,600.00
11,040.00
11
Bike rack
4,500.00
5,175.00
12
Picnic table (does not include tables under main park building)
30,000.00
34,500.00
13
Bench seating
15,600.00
17,940.00
14
Drinking fountain (assumes water source nearby)
5,000.00
5,750.00
15
36" high decorative fencing
50,000.00
57,500.00
16
12" wide concrete maintenance strip for decorative fencing
6,000.00
6,900.00
17
Park & City Hall Sculpture / Sin
40,000.00
46,000.00
18
Play area concrete curbing
12,600.00
14,490.00
19
Play area poured -in-place surfacing
78,000.00
89700.00
20
Wood fiber safety surfacing
7,500.00
8,625.00
21
IPlav etrumment(bud (budget)
75,000.00
86,250.00
22
Picnic Shelter (budget)
40,000.00
46,000.00
23
Multi-purpose building (includes 2 restrooms, kitchen, storage, open-air pavillion, stage)
750,000.00
1,000,000.00
24
Turf reinforcement for building service drives
26;400.00
30,360.00
25
Turf restoration
27,000.00
31,050.00
26
Tree and shrub plantings
20 000.00
23 000.00
Estimated Subtotal (includes 10% contingency and 15% testing, td's, and surveying fees) 1
$2,133,625.00
$2,625,543.75
Total estimated construction cost:
$2,583,625.00
$3,143,043.75
Brauer Associates, Ltd. Ki01904-390V.-Arch IDOCSU904-390 Lions Park- mosterplan cost est Pagel f2
The next steps...
Master planning for the proposed improvements was the first step in making the public's ideas become reality. This level of design sets the purpose,
goals and general guidelines for the project. As fundingbecomes available to proceed with part or all of the improvements, design refinements will
be required. The process of design is intended to raise and answer questions in a logical manner. Working from the broad concepts framed by the
Master Plan to the detail of construction documents, each step is intended to give affected parties the information required to proceed or revise the
design. In order of refinement, the following are the normal steps taken toward realizing the proposed improvements of any given project:
Schematic Design
This portion of the design process is intended to give the owner and others more detailed plans and sketches and cost estimates to allow for informed
decisions regarding space requirements, proportions, and appearance and cost alternatives.
Design Develooment
This step is a further refinement of drawings and estimates of cost. Issues conceming project systems should be explored along with material choices
and construction techniques. These alternatives and their probable cost/benefit must be investigated to insure a design that will be in compliance with
available funding and provide a project that is maintainable. The owner and consultant should review the design development documents with
affected agency reviewers to receive guidance on the projects potential approval, the approval process and the likely time required in formal agency
Construction Documents and Agency Review & Approvals
These documents are prepared for cost effective bidding m negotiation of the project construction and will form a part of any contract with a
contactor. All systems, materials and dimensions must be described and accurately depicted to give contractors guidance as to the final project
requirements. In addition to construction documents being used for construction they also are the final documents used in any agency approval
process. Potential agency i permit reviews may include the following: city grading, city building, city water connection, etc.
Brauer Associates. Lid. K. 101904-390L ArchIDOM1904-390 Lions Park - master plan cos? eat Page 2 aft
e_
• F HUGO, M INN ESOTA
'ti�
PLAN HIGHLIGHTS:
• Combined City Hall / Park
Entrance and main parking area
• Continuous pedestrian -way
between City Hall and Park
• Additional off street parking
• (4) Designated Vehicular
Event Access Points
• One main parking building
• Centralized plaza space
• Age separated play features
• Highly visible Basketball
court and Skate park
• Significant amount of open
space for flexibility of use
• Bay Parking = 45 spaces
• City Hall Parking = 25 spaces
oe .
V 40' V as 120'
GRAPHIC SO
i
RAUEk & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
-
A, o%!dSO 7+.As llluttes, In,
Col firma -sur tnnlh. Only 500
Minnaa...1 , MN 51416
,.re a. sbenp mm
4
H[UGO
Njoct#1901190
Septra eF 251h, 2011
PRelimmaer Master Plan Resim
Bench Seating -
typ
Temporary Event
Fencing - typ.
General Skating
& Concert
Seating
• (-150' x 250')
Multi -Purpose
Park Building
• Food Shelf
• Lions storage
Kitchen • Restroom.
• Picnic shelter
• Raised stage
Vehicular Event
Access Points -
typ.
• Concrete apron
& curb cut
SECTION A -A'
Parking Bay
UPPER 146TH
Z -
Active Neighborhood Recreation –
• Picnic shelter
• Multi-age play equipment
• Skate park • Basketball court
• Age separation between facilities
• Bike racks, Drinking fountain, Trash receptacles
M
Open Lawn Space
• 'Carnival' space
• Family picnic area
N
Ornamental — Sculpture / Sign
Fencing - typ. - Raised platform
• Planting area
r
14/TH
Connect to Regional
Trail System
Picnic Table - typ.
City Hall Parking
- 25 spaces
j • Closes Fitzgerald to thru-traffic
• Allows for continuous pedestrian -
way connection to park
Lij
10 .
Connect to Regional.
Trail System _ ,
i;
N
LL
Water Plaza
• Centralized water feature
• Seating areas
• Planting areas
City Hall Parking
- 25 spaces
j • Closes Fitzgerald to thru-traffic
• Allows for continuous pedestrian -
way connection to park
Lij
10 .
Connect to Regional.
Trail System _ ,
Agenda Number: IV
CITY OF HUGO
PARKS COMMISSION REPORT
TO: City of Hugo Parks, Recreation and Open Space Commission
FROM: Shayla Syverson, Parks Planner
SUBJECT: LaValle Properties Concept Plan
DATE: Septemberl9, 2012 for the Parks Commission meeting of September 26,
2012
BACKGROUND:
A concept plan has been submitted to the City of Hugo for feedback on the development
of 5 vacant parcels of land adjacent to Lions Park. The properties, generally located west
of Lions Park and north of Frenchman Road, are currently owned by Marvin LaValle.
The applicant Bill Lentsch, is proposing to develop 3 multi -family residential buildings.
The first phase would include an Assisted Living facility, followed by a CommonBond
apartment building, and then a Congregate Care facility. At their meeting of September
13, 2012, the Planning Commission reviewed the concept plans and provided feedback.
The applicant is seeking feedback from the Parks Commission on park dedication and
this concept plan prior to moving forward with the formal application process for
development approval.
2. CONCEPT PLAN:
The applicant intends to apply for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) to accommodate
the density that is proposed. The majority of LaValle's properties are guided as Mixed
Use (MIX) and a small portion as Medium Density Residential (MD) according to the
2030 Land Use Plan. The density proposed for this development is anticipated to comply
with the standards stated in the Comprehensive Plan's Land Use requirements.
General Layout
The concept plan shows an overall campus layout containing residential development of
three 3 -story buildings along the southern portion of the property with the expansion of
-1-
Prairie Village
June 9, 2010
Lions Park taking up the northern portion. The buildings are laid out to follow the
contours and perimeter of the property. The buildings on the west of the property are
situated to obtain a vista of the adjacent wetlands. There are several above ground
parking lots and underground parking lots shown within the development. The plan also
shows areas of future building expansions and parking if the development were to grow.
Road Construction & Access
The concept plan shows the proposed development will be accessed off of Upper 146th
Street and 146th Street with private driveways. Staff has been working with the
developer to ensure that 147" Street expands west to Oneka Parkway, as described in the
City's transportation plan. 147"' borders the north side of Lions Park.
The Developer's concept plan shows the elimination of Finale Avenue between 147`x'
Street and 146`x' Street. This does not pose traffic issues because the road is
underutilized, and it will not be necessary to service the proposed development. The
proposed Lions Park Concept Plan by WSB & Associates shows Finale Avenue to
remain. Finale Avenue is currently in rough condition and will need to be extensively
repaired to adequately serve the proposed development and the park. These repairs will
be needed whether or not Finale Avenue is eliminated between 147th Street and Upper
146th Street. It is likely that a connection will be made to the south to Frenchman Road.
Housing Types
The housing shown in the concept plan is proposed to be a three story Assisted Living
Facility with 100 units, a three story CommonBond apartment building with 54
affordable housing units, and a three story Congregate Care center with 90 units. There
will be 244 units in total when the development is fully complete. The plan also shows
the location of other phases, should additional building capacity be needed.
Drainage Options
The concept plan shows two proposed drainage options- a pond on the northern portion
of the property and rain gardens along the western edge of the property. The pond on the
northern portion of the property would provide the main source of storm water
management. The pond will control the discharge into the wetlands. Staff will work with
the applicant to determine whether or not the size of this pond is appropriate for the
development and meets the requirements. The rain gardens will also be evaluated in
terms of size and function.
3. CONSISTENCY WITH THE DOWNTOWN PLAN:
The Downtown Plan focuses on the redevelopment of the area around City Hall,
including the properties included in the concept plan. The Downtown Plan shows an
expansion of Lions Park with the incorporation of a Community Center in the northern
portion of LaValle's property, and an extension of a traditional residential area in the
-2-
Prairie Village
June 9, 2010
southern portion. Finale Avenue is planned to extend to the south to connect with
Frenchman Road, which will allow direct access into the site. Upper 146th Street and
146th Street are planned to extend to the west to continue the flow of the residential grid
system.
4. CONSISTENCY WITH THE PARKS PLAN:
Park Development
Lions Park is guided to continue to serve as a significant central gathering area for the
community and host to large events. The development of community park facilities
conveniently located near residential populations was a major component of the park and
recreation vision expressed by the residents of Hugo at the time the Parks Plan was put
together. Additional indoor and outdoor multi -use recreation facilities are needed in the
community. Facilities may include a fitness center, indoor ice arena, and areas for
passive activities like picnicking and walking. The Parks Plan supports park
development which preserves and utilizes Hugo's natural resources and open space areas
including lakes, wetlands, and woodlands. An expansion of Lions Park would allow for
more event space and construction of additional park features.
Trails
Currently, Lions Park is connected to the Hardwood Creek Trail and via neighborhood
roads to the County -owned trail along Frenchman Road. City sidewalks are planned in
the neighborhood adjacent to Lions Park. A City trail is anticipated along 147d' Street
when it expands to provide a connection to Oneka Parkway and beyond. The applicant
has shown a network of trails and paths throughout their development linking to Lions
Park. The developer will be required to make public improvements such as sidewalks
and roadways.
Lions Park Master Plans
At this time, the Parks Commission has been working with residents and other
stakeholders to master plan Lions Park with the help of WSB & Associates. Public input
has directed that the plan be focused on an organic shape and have a large building as
well as alarge open space for events. Neighborhood recreation amenities will be
included to provide for the surrounding residential areas. Several options for parking and
circulation around the park have been discussed. Pedestrian connections within the park
and to nearby trails has been important. Other features discussed to be included at Lions
Park are concert -style seating, a water features and space for temporary event structures.
5. PROPOSED PARK DEDICATION:
Developers are required to pay park dedication to ensure that the parks system provides
for the recreation needs of the additional residents the development brings. The
developer may dedicate land or pay a fee. Typically, a combination of fees and land
-3-
Prairie Village
June 9, 2010
dedication is used to meet the requirements. The Parks Commission evaluates each
proposed park dedication in conjunction with the formal application process for
residential development approval to ensure that is in keeping with the Parks Plan and
provides a recommendation to the City Council.
The developer is proposing to build 244 units on 14.44 buildable acres. The current fee
(which is annually set by the City Council), is $2,400 per unit. The developer could be
required to pay $585,600 in park dedication fees in lieu of land.
The Park Dedication Policy includes a sliding scale for land dedication. Therefore, a
high density development (over 10 units per acre) such as being proposed, 17% of the
buildable land shall be dedicated. Therefore, the developer would be required to dedicate
2.45 acres in lieu of paying the fee.
The developer is looking to dedicate land in lieu of paying park dedication fees. The
concept plan shows an expansion of Lions Park across Finale Avenue and over the
northern portion of their property. There is a stormwater pond proposed to take up a
majority of the dedicated park land, which is not typically an acceptable option for the
substitution of park dedication fees. The developer would like to show how the pond
may be used for a recreational purpose.
6. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends direction be given to the developer on the proposed park dedication for
the LaValle properties located east of Lions Park. In the future, when the developer
formally applies for development approval, a proposed park dedication will be reviewed
by the Parks Commission for a formal recommendation.
At this time, feedback should be given to the developer including:
1) Expansion of Lions Park to the east
2) Access/ Transportation (Finale Avenue or Fitzgerald Avenue)
3) Connections of trails and sidewalks
4) Proposed pond
7. ATTACHMENTS:
1) Park Dedication Policy & Fee Schedule
2) Downtown Plan
3) Lions Park Preliminary Master Plan
4) Location Map
5) Proposed Site Plan*
*Please note that the Architect received the 3 concept plan alternatives presented at the
Stakeholder meeting of August 8, 2012 but has not heard the public's input or seen recent
changes to the plan.
-4-
Prairie Village
June 9, 2010
I.
Sec. 90-324. - Park dedication.
(a) General dedication standards. In order to develop a system of parks within the community to serve
the public's health and recreational needs, a percentage of the net buildable acreage based on the
density of all land subdivided for residential purposes shall be dedicated to the city as public
parkland. The city finds that the more dense a development is, the more demand for park land it
creates since lots can be smaller affording less private recreational space and more occupants per
acre. The following formula will be used to determine the dedication requirement where a land
dedication is required:
Density
Percentage of Land to be Dedicated (of the buildable land)
—3.99 units per acre
10 percent
4.00-5.99 units per acre
11 percent
6.00-7.99 units per acre
13 percent
8.00-9.99 units per acre
15 percent
10.00 < units per acre
17 percent
The land so dedicated shall be subject to approval by the city council in accordance with the city's
Comprehensive Plan for parks. At the city council's discretion, a parkland dedication fee may be accepted
or required instead of or connection with land dedication. The parkland dedication fee shall be set annually
by the city council and adopted as part of the city's fee schedule. The parkland dedication fee shall be
charged for each dwelling unit originated by the subdivision or development of any property in the city, not
including any dwelling unit that may be in existence at the time of the adoption of the ordinance from which
this article is derived, or which is subject to an approved development agreement with the city that includes
a parkland dedication provision.
(b) Appeal process. The parkland dedication fee may be appealed to the city council before the city
council makes a decision on the final plat and shall be calculated as follows: The percentage of land
to be dedicated will be multiplied by the fair market value of the net buildable acreage.
The fair market value shall be determined by the city council, following their review of a current
appraisal submitted to the city at the developer's expense. The appraisal shall be made by appraisers who
are approved members of the SREA or MAI, or equivalent real estate appraisal societies.
If the city receives written notice of a dispute over the parkland dedication fee before approval of the
final plat, the developer shall pay the fee into an escrow account pending a decision of an appeal of the
fee. If an appeal is not filed within 60 days following approval of the final plat, or if the person aggrieved by
the fee does not prevail on the appeal, then the funds paid into escrow must be transferred to the city.
(Prior Code, § 1215-040.1; Ord. No. 2010-449, § 1, 11-15-2010)
N
t
4
w.
— 1
s
r
L9 Ll
`- L`
LjI
L -I 1 � ill
ri
Il
- L,J
t
._A
Y �—
Jti i
3
City of Hugo
March 15, 2010
a.
` M1 M1 M1
CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA J",ANk
i' =,
PLAN HIGHLIGHTS:
• Combined City Hall / Park
Entrance and main parking area
• Continuous pedestrian -way
between City Hall and Park
• Additional off street parking
• (4) Designated Vehicular
Event Access Points
• One main parking building
• Centralized plaza space
• Age separated play features
• Highly visible Basketball
court and Skate park
• Significant amount of open
space for flexibility of use
• Bay Parking = 45 spaces
• City Hall Parking = 25 spaces
0 40' 0' 120'
Ga'Pnic.SC,L
�V
40BRALIER & ASSOCIATES, LTD.
?Jvlsmn dWSs&Assortiat" In�U(`�',
o. G
'0� Yema+.enxe 9oulM1 Snnc>n0 PioJrc i-11041)0
nenn�apnbtiiry ssn l6 SgnanLn?Lfi!012
m... n,beng..,m Pi Flimmar i1u�=i Plan Pi mux
Bench Seating -
typ
Temporary Event
Fencing - typ.
General Skating
& Concert
Seating
• (-150' x 250')
Multi -Purpose
Park Building
• Food Shelf
• Lions storage
• Kitchen • Restroom.
• Picnic shelter
• Raised stage
ai
r
Vehicular Event
Access Points -
typ
• Concrete apron
& curb cut
LL
SECTION A -A'
if
Emb
Bay
UPPER 146TH
Active Neighborhood Recreation
• Picnic shelter
• Multi-age play equipment
• Skate park • Basketball court
• Age separation between facilities
• Bike racks, Drinking fountain, Trash receptacles
Open Lawn Space
• 'Carnival' space
• Family picnic area
0
t
Sculpture / Sign
• Raised platform
• Planting area
1 47TH =�
Connect to Regional
Trail System
-- Picnic Table - typ.
d �
1�
N
X
Water Plaza
- • Centralized water feature -
• seating areas
• Planting areas
City Hall Parking
e
r spaces
•Closes Fitzgerald to ihru-traffic
• Allows for continuous pedestrian -
way connection to park
Connect to Regional
Trail System -,
3.
s�A
1
rfrf"
•r�filtiW
dun
ornamental
Fencing - typ.
0
t
Sculpture / Sign
• Raised platform
• Planting area
1 47TH =�
Connect to Regional
Trail System
-- Picnic Table - typ.
d �
1�
N
X
Water Plaza
- • Centralized water feature -
• seating areas
• Planting areas
City Hall Parking
e
r spaces
•Closes Fitzgerald to ihru-traffic
• Allows for continuous pedestrian -
way connection to park
Connect to Regional
Trail System -,
3.
Site Map
LaValle Properties
kX,
Ow
v^
ZOO-
1 inch = 300 feet
lY
7;1
qq
kit.
--n,6
Ile
1 inch = 300 feet
a
r SCC(
IV •' /' U
anV Pleja623ld a o
_ YE + 1
� o v
`ny
c v C u
� rn3
L
C .
a
♦
o
\
z
L,
Y
�
C
GL �
c
o
�
o
a
n
mom
61)
L
v
�
o
♦
\
z
L,
Y
�
C
GL �
c
o
�
o
a
n
e a
0
�
t
L
a�
n
c
Y
mom
61)
L
m ^
G
v
z
Q
?Lc
GL �
N I N
C �
Q
o
�z
e a
T�
c
a
U
m/
02,
w v
n
U
C�
o
U �
mom
61)
51
L
m ^
G
c -
E o
z
U.,.
?Lc
GL �
o
�z
Oo
au
51