HomeMy WebLinkAbout2014.02.26 Parks PacketAgenda
Parks Commission Meetinq of Februa
Hugo City Hall, 7:00pm
26, 2014
7:00 pm
Approve Minutes from January 8, 2013 Meeting
7:05 pm
Fox Meadows Park Dedication
7:35 pm
Trail Development Policy
8:20 pm
Recreation Program Update
8:30 pm
Adjournment
Background
Parks Commission Meeting of February 26, 2014
Hugo City Hall, 7:OOpm
7:00 pm Approve Minutes from January 8, 2014 Meeting
Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the Parks Commission meeting of January 8,
2014.
7:05 pm Fox Meadows Park Dedication
A preliminary plat application has been submitted by Meridian Land Company for 57 single-
family homes known as "Fox Meadows". It is located on 21.97 acres south of Beaver Ponds. It
will be served by Beaver Ponds Park and include a connection to existing trails. The applicant
is proposing to pay park dedication fees in the amount of $136,800 in lieu of dedicating land.
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED MEMO.
7:35 pm Trail Development Policy
As a part of their 2014 goals, the Parks Commission would like to create a trail policy to help
with discussions about missing trail segments and connections. Some background on the City
of Hugo Trail and Sidewalk Plan and current practice is attached. Staff recommends discussion
on what the policy would include and what the outcome would be.
PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED MEMO.
8:20 pm Recreation Program Update
At their annual goal setting workshop held February 18, 2014, the City Council took the Parks
Commission's recommendation for a workshop to strategize and plan future recreation
programming. The Parks Commission could recommend a couple dates that would work to
hold the workshop to the City Council. The regularly scheduled Parks Commission meeting of
April 9 could be scheduled as a workshop.
Movie Night on February 21 was cancelled due to the weather. The next Movie Night is
scheduled for March 21. Kidz 'n Biz will be held Saturday, April 26.
8:30 pm Adjournment
Minutes
Parks Commission, City of Hugo
January 8, 2014
7:00 P.M.
Council Chambers, City Hall
Call to Order
Present: Joan Benner, Mat Rauschendorfer, Nicole Schmid, Dave Strub, Jim Taylor, Tom
Windisch
Staff Present: Shayla Syverson, Parks Planner
Debi Close, Secretary
Absent: Rachel Berger
Jim Taylor called the meeting to order at 7:03 p.m.
I. Approval of Minutes from December Meeting
Windisch made a motion, Strub seconded to approve the minutes of the December 11th, 2013.
All Ayes.
Motion carried.
II. Elmcrest Avenue Trail Options
Shayla Syverson, Parks Planner reviewed a letter from the Heritage Ponds Neighborhood
Association in regards to interest in a trail along Elmcrest Avenue. The Trail and Sidewalk Plan
proposes a city trail along the west side of Elmcrest Ave between CSAH 8 and 180'" Street and
connections to regional trails.
The City of Lino Lakes has proposed commercial projects that would border the West side of
Elmcrest. The Parks Commission discussed a preference for the trail alignment shown in the
Trail and Sidewalk Plan. City staff was directed to continue discussions with Lino Lakes and
research grants programs for trail connectivity.
III. Irish Avenue Park Planning
Shayla Syverson, Parks Planner, presented an overview of the history of Irish Avenue Park.
Strub reminded the property purchase had goals including sharing Lions events and
incorporating large scale community events. The Parks Commission reviewed what the minutes
and what was discussed with the neighborhood and residents.
Strub requested City staff to review the public meeting notes or proposals to find the goals to be
revisited at the Parks Commission Meeting.
IV. Meeting chances
Shayla Syverson, Parks Planner presented a 2014 Calendar with meeting changes, recreation
activities and special public meetings. The Parks Commission changed the meeting dates as
follows:
Wednesday, February 12th to Wednesday, February 26th
Wednesday, March 12th to Wednesday, March 261
VI. Recreation Proaram Update
Shayla Syverson, Parks Planner reminded of the upcoming events.
Movie night on Friday, January 101 showing Despicable Me II at Oneka Elementary School
Snow Jam on Saturday, January 11th at Oneka Elementary School
V. Adjournment
Windisch made a motion, Benner seconded to adjourn the meeting at 8:41 pm.
Agenda Number:
CITY OF HUGO
PARKS COMMISSION REPORT
TO: City of Hugo Parks, Recreation and Open Space Commission
FROM: Shayla Syverson, Parks Planner
SUBJECT: Meridian Land Company. Request for Preliminary Plat for "Fox
Meadows" consisting of 57 single family homes on 21.97 acres off of
125'h Street east of Highway 61, south of Beaver Ponds development.
DATE: February 21, 2014 for the Parks Commission meeting of February 26,
2014
1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting preliminary plat approval for 57 lots on 21.97 acres to be
known as "Fox Meadows". The property is zoned Single Family Detached Residential
(R-3) and is a vacant parcel. The average lot size will be 13,427 square feet.
The property to the north is occupied by the Beaver Ponds residential development. The
property to the east is zoned R-3 and is a vacant parcel that was previously farmed. The
property to the south is zoned R-3 and is occupied by the Oneka Ridge Golf Course and
the City's well house #6. The property to the west is zoned R-3 and is occupied by large
lot single family homes.
The applicant has stated that the development will occur in two phases. This is the
preliminary phasing plan and may change prior to final plat.
2. CONSISTENCY WITH PARK PLAN:
Trails
The applicant will be constructing an 8' bituminous trail along Fondant Trail North,
which is the primary north -south roadway through the development. The trail will
provide a pedestrian connection to Beaver Ponds Park. The trail is shown in the Trail and
Sidewalk Plan and therefore the developer is required to build it. The developer will
-1-
Fox Meadows
February 26, 2014
construct and incur all costs for building the trail. In the future, the trail is planned to
make connections to 130th Street, Goodview Avenue, and 125th Street.
The developer will be extending 125th Street to provide access to the development from
Hwy 61. East of Fenway Avenue, 125th Street is currently a gravel roadway. The
developer will improve 1256' Street to be a rural -section paved roadway. The intersection
at the entrance to Fox Meadows, at 125th Street and Fondant Trail, is likely to be
reconfigured with future development. The properties to the north and south of 1251
Street are likely to be re -developed. At that time, 125`h Street will be improved to be an
urban -section paved roadway which will include an expanded right-of-way and
construction of an adjacent trail.
Open Spaces/Parks
The proposed development is served by Beaver Ponds Park, which is an existing
neighborhood park. When Beaver Ponds was developed, the park was planned to also
serve future development in the surrounding areas. Additional parkland or a new
neighborhood park is not needed. The applicant is proposing to pay a fee in lieu of
making a land dedication.
3. PARK DEDICATION REQUIREMENTS:
In order to develop a system of parks within the community to serve the public's health
and recreational needs, a fee or land shall be dedicated to the city when land is
subdivided for residential purposes. Recommendations shall be made by the Parks
Commission in accordance with the Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan. Dedication is
subject to approval by the City Council.
The developer is required to dedicate land or pay a fee or a dedicate combination of land
and fee.
Land Dedication Option
The City finds that the more dense a development is, the more demand for park land it
creates since lots can be smaller affording less private recreational space and more
occupants per acre. Fox Meadows is proposed to include 57 homes on 21.97 acres at a
density of 2.6 units per acres. Therefore, the applicant would be required to dedicate
10% of the total buildable acreage or 2.2 acres of land.
Fee Dedication Option
At the City Council's discretion, a fee may be accepted or required. The City Council
annually sets the park dedication fee which is currently $2,400 per unit. The applicant
would be required to dedicate $136,800. The applicant shall pay the fee that is in effect
at the time of final plat.
-2-
Fox Meadows
February 26, 2014
4. PARK DEDICATION PROPOSAL:
The applicant is proposing to pay $136,800 to satisfy the park dedication requirements.
The developer will be required to make park dedication at the time of final plat.
5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends acceptance of $136,800 in park dedication as proposed by the
applicant of the Fox Meadows Preliminary Plat. The proposal is consistent with the
City's Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan for this area.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Park Dedication Policy & Fee Schedule
2. Location Map
3. Proposed Site Plan
-3-
Fox Meadows
February 26, 2014
Sec. 90-324. - Park dedication.
(a) General dedication standards. In order to develop a system of parks within the community
to serve the public's health and recreational needs, a percentage of the net buildable acreage
based on the density of all land subdivided for residential purposes shall be dedicated to the city
as public parkland. The city finds that the more dense a development is, the more demand for
park land it creates since lots can be smaller affording less private recreational space and more
occupants per acre. The following formula will be used to determine the dedication requirement
where a land dedication is required:
Density
I Percentage of Land to be Dedicated (of the buildable land)
0-3.99 units per acre
10 percent
4.00-5.99 units per acre
11 percent
6.00-7.99 units per acre
13 percent
8.00-9.99 units per acre
15 percent
10.00 < units per acre
17 percent
The land so dedicated shall be subject to approval by the city council in accordance with the
city's Comprehensive Plan for parks. At the city council's discretion, a parkland dedication fee
may be accepted or required instead of or connection with land dedication. The parkland
dedication fee shall be set annually by the city council and adopted as part of the city's fee
schedule. The parkland dedication fee shall be charged for each dwelling unit originated by the
subdivision or development of any property in the city, not including any dwelling unit that may
be in existence at the time of the adoption of the ordinance from which this article is derived, or
which is subject to an approved development agreement with the city that includes a parkland
dedication provision.
(b) Appeal process. The parkland dedication fee may be appealed to the city council before the
city council makes a decision on the final plat and shall be calculated as follows: The percentage
of land to be dedicated will be multiplied by the fair market value of the net buildable acreage.
The fair market value shall be determined by the city council, following their review of a current
appraisal submitted to the city at the developer's expense. The appraisal shall be made by
appraisers who are approved members of the SREA or MAI, or equivalent real estate appraisal
societies.
If the city receives written notice of a dispute over the parkland dedication fee before approval of
the final plat, the developer shall pay the fee into an escrow account pending a decision of an
appeal of the fee. If an appeal is not filed within 60 days following approval of the final plat, or if
the person aggrieved by the fee does not prevail on the appeal, then the funds paid into escrow
must be transferred to the city.
Parkland Dedication Fee: Commercial and Industrial: Exempt; Residential: $2,400.00 per unit
Trail Policy
TO: City of Hugo Parks, Recreation and Open Space Commission
FROM: Shayla Syverson, Parks Planner
DATE: February 20, 2014 for the Parks Commission Meeting of February 26, 2014
1 INTRODUCTION
The Parks Commission has had ongoing discussions about missing trail segments and connections.
Creation of a Trail Policy which would help evaluate and prioritize trail projects was on the 2014 Goals of
the Parks Commission. At the annual goal setting of the City Council held on February 18, 2014, support
was given for evaluation of missing trail connections and a policy.
2 CURRENT PRACTICE
2.1 TRAIL PLAN
Trails and sidewalks are constructed in the City of Hugo according to the Future Trail and Sidewalk Plan
that is a part of the City of Hugo Comprehensive Plan. The trail plan identifies locations for potential
trail corridors and provides recommendations for the implementation of the trail system.
The trail plan emphasizes coordination with state and regional trails and providing connections to
extend Hugo's trail system. The general layout of the trails is based on the roadway network and future
development.
Emphasis is placed on working with developers and landowners to find specific areas for trails. The trail
plan states:
Trails will be constructed as surrounding development occurs or as general funding is
provided through park dedication fees. Itis not the City's intention to condemn land for
trails.
The trail plan details a variety of trail classifications including bicycle lanes, snowmobile trails, equestrian
trails, multi-user trails, and sidewalks. The trail system will provide for a wide variety of transportation
and recreation needs.
It is important that all future trails and sidewalks be identified in Trail and Sidewalk Plan. It allows for
their construction to be adequately planned for, whether it is through future redevelopment of
properties or with road projects.
Trail Policy February 26, 2014
2.2 PLIBLICSLIPPORT
Hugo residents have consistently expressed an interest in a comprehensive trail system connecting
neighborhoods to parks and open spaces areas. The trail plan states:
Hugo residents have expressed a strong need for a trail system in Hugo. However,
throughout the park planning process, many landowners expressed concern over the
preliminary plans that showed potential trail corridors on or near their property... the
city should work closely with residents and landowners when designing and constructing
specific trails.
It is important that residents are involved in planning of the trail system, understand the overall system,
and the benefits.
2.3 TRAIL PLAN IMPLEMENTATION
Currently, trails and sidewalks that are identified in the trail plan are constructed with road projects and
development.
Because of the ongoing growth of Hugo, the city is in a position to ensure that trails and sidewalks are
constructed with residential and commercial development. Large residential developments, such as
Victor Gardens, Waters Edge, and Diamond Point, have included a network of sidewalks and trails
through the entire development. Recently, trails and sidewalks were shown on the Lavalle Fields PUD,
constructed with the Prairie Village residential development, and constructed with the commercial
projects adjacent to Rosemary Way.
The City Council approved the Special Assessment Policy which addresses assessments in the City for all
public improvements. One component of the policy identifies types of possible road projects and what
is included. Road projects can range from routine maintenance to complete reconstruction. For
example, mill and overlay projects or other resurfacing projects would not prompt construction of a new
sidewalk. As storm sewer is installed, a road is completely reconstructed or with the addition of
concrete curb and gutter; sidewalk or trail construction is more appropriate.
There have been successes with current the current practice of working with landowners and
developers in implementing the Future Trail and Sidewalk Plan.
3 TRAIL DEVELOPMENT POLICY DISCUSSION
If the Parks Commission would like to supplement the Future Trail and Sidewalk Plan with a trail
development policy, there are a few things that should be discussed:
What is purpose of the policy?
What should be considered when prioritizing?
• Is it in the Trail and Sidewalk Plan?
• What connections would the trail provide?
• Is the trail going to be constructed with future development or future road projects?
Trail Policy February 26, 2014
• Is the trail desired by the property owners, surrounding properties, and or neighborhood?
Why?
• What is needed to construct the trail? Is land available? Is there a willing seller? How would
the City go about acquiring land? The Trail Plan does not support eminent domain or
condemning land. Would the Parks Commission like to consider these means?
• What is unique about the situation?
• What are the alternatives?
Are there changes that should be made to the Future Trail and Sidewalk Plan?
4 RECOMMENDATION
Staff recommends that the Parks Commission discuss current practice and a trail development policy.
5 ATTACHMENTS
1) Comprehensive Plan Section 7.5: Future Trail and Sidewalk Plan
2) Map 7-F: Trail and Sidewalk Plan
Trail Policy February 26, 2014 3
7.5. FUTURE TRAIL AND SIDEWALK PLAN
Hugo residents have consistently expressed a strong interest in developing a network of
multi-purpose trails connecting neighborhoods to existing and proposed parks and open
space areas in the City. This section will provide the framework for the establishment of
a comprehensive trail system for the City of Hugo. The chapter will prioritize and locate
potential trail connections in relation to existing and propose parks and open space
corridors, examine the benefits and impacts of the trails system and provide guidelines
and recommendations for the implementation of this trail system. Trails will be
constructed as surrounding development occurs or as general funding is provided
through park dedication fees. It is not the City's intention to condemn land for trails.
Sidewalk Plan
Sidewalks serve several purposes within a community, including providing alternative
transportation routes for individuals who choose not to drive, provide safe routes for
exercise, provide connections to neighborhood parks and provide opportunities for
neighbors to connect with each other. The City should encourage sidewalks as part of
new developments within the urban area.
Trail System Plan
The City has completed an update to the existing Trail System Plan (see Map 7-F —
Trail and Sidewalk Plan). This new plan shows the potential trail routes in the City that
are desired by the community. The majority of the trails will be constructed as
surrounding development occurs or as general funding is provided through park
dedication fees. It is important to display these trails on a map so that developers and
landowners are aware that the city will require construction and dedication of these trail
corridors when the land is developed.
Regional Trail Improvement Projects
Hardwood Creek Regional Trail. It is possible that this trail could be extended further
south in the future. However, the future trail extension is proposed along a portion of
the Burlington Northern Railroad tracks that is still active. Further extension of the trail
is on hold pending a change in the use of the railroad, but the City has identified other
local trail and sidewalk connections to allow pedestrian and bicyclist traffic south of this
regional trail.
Glacial Hills Regional Trail. This proposed regional trail will connect the Central Anoka
County Regional Trail to the west in Lino Lakes through Hugo to Big Marine Park
Reserve to the east. There is no master plan approved for this trail at this time.
According to the Metropolitan Council, Washington County and Anoka County will
conduct the master planning process for this trail in the future. It is important for the
City to be aware of this proposed regional trail and be involved in the master planning
Chapter 7 7.28
Parks, Trails, & Open Spaces
t4o'
process. A portion of this trail was constructed on the north side of CSAH 8 as part of
the road improvement project in 2006.
The following map from the Metropolitan Council shows the general alignment of the
proposed Hardwood Creek Trail extension and the Glacial Hills Regional Trail.
Figure 7-1. Regional Trail Corridor Map
0 05 1 15 3 25 3 35 4 45 5 55 a .5 i Mlaa
Source: Metropolitan Council, 2030 Regional Development Framework
Public Support for Trails
Parks and P'..tt s
•. FgmlLend
aw PMTa NonPmM
� RapenN
5N tam
beaIaM Counylnntl
Re .I Trails
E -U"
- Na,vwd
— Rapesq
SIaLLExif4rq
YMaga(MMI
taxa aM Malo, Rrvms
AYro, ftrrors artl 56aoms
TaLL S4aemi
202fIMlISA
RG 5trg1 Gmalina
Repbnal Trail Saa1aF Carillon
r- RouMary Ad�max
RawO,Hbn 0 N,m I
!'. Kwlhit
� Conplq,q tl,a Syrtom
Hugo residents have expressed a strong need for a trail system in Hugo. However,
throughout the park planning process, many landowners expressed concern over
preliminary plans that showed potential trail corridors on or near their property. Working
with landowners and addressing landowner concerns are important parts of the trail
system planning process.
Public support for trails is critical to successfully planning and implementing a trail
system plan. Generally, landowners support trail systems when they are part of the
planning process and when they are aware of the benefits that trails offer. Although this
Chapter 7 7-29
Parks, Trails, & Open Spaces
Cleo
master plan recommends a framework for a trail system, the City should work closely
with residents and landowners when designing and constructing specific trails.
Coordination with State and Regional Trails
Hugo's trail system should relate to other trails in and around Hugo. For example, the
Hardwood Creek Trail is a regional trail that follows the abandoned Burlington -Northern
Railroad. Where possible, city trails should connect into the county trail to give residents
a wider range of trail experiences. The City of Hugo and Washington County should
work together to provide a trailhead for the trail in an area that works well for the County
and the residents of Hugo.
The Willard Munger State Trail does not pass through Hugo, but a trail that connects the
Willard Munger trail head at Pine Point Park with the future Hardwood Creek trail head
in Hugo may be desirable. Also, Anoka County and the City of Lino Lakes have
expressed interest in connecting their trail system into the Hardwood Creek Trail at
Hugo.
Working with adjacent communities and regional governments can help enrich and
extend Hugo's trail system. This trail system plan is a first step in identifying possible
trail connections to adjacent communities.
Trail classifications
People use trails for several purposes. Some use trails primarily for transportation
(traveling from a home to a school, park, or place of business). Others use trails for
recreation (nature walks, cross-country skiing, and horseback riding). Although a trail
can function for transportation and recreation, transportation trails are mostly concerned
with getting trail users from one place to another safely and efficiently. As a result, they
often follow the road system. Recreation trails, on the other hand, are mostly concerned
with the recreational experience of the user. These trails take advantage of a variety of
natural and cultural amenities. For example, they are often found next to creeks, lakes,
and woodlands. Hugo's trail system should provide both transportation and recreation
trails. A list of specific trail types as defined in this plan follows:
Bicycle Lane: Part of a road designated for use by bicycles. The lane is identified
by signage and separated from motor vehicle lanes by striping.
2. Bicycle Route: A road signed to encourage bicycle use. A separate lane or path
would not need to be provided.
3. Bicycle -Pedestrian Path: A path constructed separate from the road or shoulder
and designated for use by bicycles and pedestrians. Often a bicycle -pedestrian
path is in a road right -of- way, but it does not necessarily have to follow the road
system. A sidewalk is a good example of a bicycle -pedestrian path.
Chapter 7 7-30
Parks, Trails, & Open Spaces
t0j6
4. Snowmobile Trail: A trail approved by the City and County for use by
snowmobiles. Snowmobile trails are often found on the outside ditches of road
right-of-ways, but, if approved by the landowner, can also be found on other
public or private land.
5. Equestrian Trail: A trail designated for exclusive or preferential use by
equestrians.
6. Nature Paths. A path designated for pedestrian use and designed to provide
access to natural areas for hiking and nature observation.
7. Multi -Use Trail: A trail constructed to accommodate a variety of users including
pedestrians, bicyclists, snowmobilers, and equestrians. Multi -use trails should
provide separate, but parallel, paths or lanes for incompatible uses. For example,
bicyclists and equestrians should have separate paths.
General layout of trails
This trail system plan provides a broad vision and an overall framework for the
development of Hugo's trails. As such, it identifies general locations for proposed trails
and it guides the City in working with developers and landowners in finding specific
areas for trails. The plan proposes developing most City trails in existing and future road
right-of-ways. There are several reasons for this:
1. Sufficient right-of-way space is generally available for trails. In most cases,
additional land would not have to be acquired.
2. Reduced construction costs can be expected when trails are constructed with
new roads and road improvements. Also, construction obstacles (for example,
wetlands, steep grades, creeks, and so on) are more easily dealt with.
3. Trail crossings are generally easier and safer where the trails are integrated with
the road system.
4. Landowners are often more accepting of trails that are integrated with the road
system rather than trails that run through the landowner's backyard. Hugo's trail
system, however, should not be limited to trails along the road system. Residents
have expressed a strong need for a variety of trails that connect parks and
natural areas. They want trails where they can walk, hike, cross country ski and
ride horses. Trails along roads are not suitable for all trail users, so the trail
system should also include off-road trails. This plan recommends that the City
acquire land for most trails as development is proposed in an area rather than
after development has occurred. For example, if a developer proposes to
subdivide an 80 -acre parcel of land for housing, it is much easier for the City to
work with the developer to integrate a trail into the development before, rather
than after, it is constructed. In this way, the City works with one landowner as
Chapter 7 7-31
Parks, Trails, & Open Spaces
t4o
opposed to many landowners. Not all trails would need to be designed and
constructed as part of a development project. For example, snowmobile and
equestrian trails may be best suited in areas where development is not expected
to occur. In these cases, trail easements could be negotiated with individual
landowners. It is not the intent of this plan, however, to acquire land through
eminent domain.
General Guidelines for trail development
The following guidelines apply to Hugo's trail system as a whole:
1. Use the Trail System Plan as a general guide for trail development, but work with
residents, landowners, and developers in designing and constructing specific
trails. This plan does not recommend acquiring land for trails through eminent
domain.
2. Provide trails that link important areas of the City. For example, provide trails that
link major residential areas to schools, the downtown area, parks, and regional
trails.
3. Do not expect the City to design, fund, build, and maintain every trail in Hugo.
Snowmobilers and equestrians, in particular, have worked with private
landowners to provide trails on private land and they should continue to do this.
The City can help coordinate planning efforts between the various organizations
that are interested in developing trails in Hugo.
4. Design the trail system to be accessible to people with physical disabilities.
Guidelines for developing accessible trails are available from many sources,
including the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources.
5. Provide trail loops of various lengths that allow users to return to their starting
point without backtracking.
6. Although topography can add interest to a trail, avoid constructing trails in areas
that will require extensive cut and fill.
7. Design and construct trails with proposed development. Do not wait until after
development has already occurred.
8. Provide a maintenance program that ensures trails will be properly maintained.
Poorly maintained trails are more of a liability than an asset.
9. Trails should be planned to connect to other nearby regional trials and trails in
other communities.
Chapter 7 7.32
Parks, Trails, & Open Spaces
turjo'
Trail descriptions and specific guidelines
Following is a brief description of existing and proposed trails in Hugo (see Figure 6-A
for a map of the trails).
1. Bicycle Lanes. The following guidelines will help the City in designing and
constructing bicycle lanes:
a) Provide bicycle lanes on both sides of designated roads.
b) Pave lanes with bituminous or concrete. Bituminous paving is the less
expensive of the two and is most commonly used.
c) Provide a minimum 8 -foot wide lane where the lane is intended to serve
as a bicycle lane and as an emergency pull -off. If an emergency pull -off is
not desired, provide a minimum 4 -foot wide lane. Generally, provide as
wide a lane as is feasible.
d) Avoid on -street parking on roads that have bicycle lanes. If on -street
parking is needed, provide a minimum 5 -foot bicycle lane between the
parking area and the driving lane or provide a bicycle -pedestrian path
separate from the road.
e) Provide striping to visually separate bicycle lanes from driving lanes and
parking areas. Also provide signage that identifies the lane as a bicycle
lane.
f) Avoid physical obstructions in bicycle lanes such as pavement rumble
strips, signs, and so on.
2. Bicycle Routes. A bicycle route simply encourages bicyclists to use a
designated road for bicycle travel. Guidelines for designating a road as a bicycle
route follow:
a) Designate a road as a bicycle route if the road provides good reasons to
encourage bicycle traffic on it. For example, if a trail is needed in a general
area, consider designating the safest, the most efficient, or the most
scenic road in the area as a bicycle route. This will encourage bicyclists to
use the best possible road to get to where they want to go.
b) Provide adequate signage so that bicyclists know which roads are bicycle
routes.
3. Bicycle — Pedestrian Paths. This plan proposes most of Hugo's bicycle -
pedestrian paths be developed within the portion of Hugo that is served by
municipal sewer and water. This is where the densest development and the
Chapter 7 7-33
Parks, Trails, & Open Spaces
tiio'
heaviest traffic occur. Because paths are separated from roads, they provide
many trail users (especially pedestrians, children, and average bicyclists) with a
safe and enjoyable way to use the trail system. The following guidelines will help
the City design and construct bicycle -pedestrian paths:
a) Provide bicycle -pedestrian paths in areas where they are most needed.
For example, provide paths that link residential neighborhoods to parks,
schools and the downtown area.
b) Where paths runs parallel to the road system, provide paths on both sides
of busy or wide roads that are difficult or unsafe to cross.
c) On lightly traveled, low -speed roads, provide a minimum 5 -foot separation
between paths and roads. Where paths are next to heavily traveled, high-
speed roads, consider providing a minimum 10 -foot separation between
paths and roads and providing berms and plantings to buffer the paths
from the roads.
d) Pave paths with bituminous or concrete. Bituminous paving is the less
expensive of the two and is most commonly used. In some cases, for
example where a path is short and is not expected to carry much traffic, a
compacted aggregate surface may be acceptable.
e) Avoid obstacles like mailboxes, signs, and power poles.
f) Provide a minimum 10 -foot wide path where the path is intended to
accommodate both pedestrians and bicyclists.
g) If a path is expected to be heavily used by both pedestrians and bicyclists,
consider providing separate paths for each user. The two uses could be
separated by striping, or they could be physically separated by distance.
The pedestrian portion of the path should be at least 5 -feet wide and the
bicycle portion of the trail should be at least 8 -feet wide.
h) Limit the number of areas that paths cross streets. Where crossings are
required, provide crossings in highly visible areas and where street traffic
can be controlled. Provide curb cuts where there are existing curbs.
4. Snowmobile Trails. The existing snowmobile trails in Hugo provide winter
recreation opportunities for many people. Washington County and the City of
Hugo approve snowmobile trails in Hugo. The private snowmobile clubs maintain
the trails with support from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. In
general, snowmobiles are allowed on the outside shoulder of county and state
road ditches. They are also allowed on private land with landowner permission.
This plan does not recommend eliminating snowmobile trails in Hugo, but the
City should recognize that the potential for snowmobile accidents and conflicts
Chapter 7 7-34
Parks, Trails, & Open Spaces
CH,o'g
will increase as Hugo continues to grow. To reduce conflicts, snowmobile trails
must be properly designed and maintained, and snowmobilers must use the trails
in a safe and respectful manner. The City should work with snowmobile
associations and Washington County to address concerns related to
snowmobiling. The following guidelines are intended to assist the City in
evaluating existing and proposed snowmobile trails:
a) Avoid trails in areas where the potential for conflicts is high - for example,
in densely populated areas, near schools, and so on. An exception has
been made to allow snowmobiles to access the downtown area via the
Hardwood Creek Trail, but speed limits, signage, and other safety issues
should be adequately addressed in these areas.
b) Avoid trails in significant natural areas as identified in the natural system
plan. Where possible, provide a minimum 200 -foot buffer between trails
and significant natural areas. The existing trail system shows two trails
that cross significant natural areas: one along Hardwood Creek north of
County Road 4 and the other at Egg Lake near downtown Hugo. These
trails should be carefully evaluated for potential damage to the existing
natural areas and alternate routes should be explored.
c) Separate snowmobile trails from other trails, including cross-country ski
trails.
d) Minimize road crossings. Where trails must cross roads, provide
designated crossing areas that have adequate visibility and are properly
signed.
e) Provide signage as needed to identify trail boundaries and reduce the
potential for trespassing.
f) Maintain trails regularly to ensure they are safe.
g) Where safety, noise, or other concerns may exist, consider reducing
speed limits and limiting the 'hours that trails can be used.
h) Consider sponsoring a meeting with snowmobiling associations that would
focus on addressing the concerns of residents and also on promoting safe
and respectful use of the trail system. The snowmobile trails in the Hugo
area are designed and maintained by the snowmobiling associations with
assistance from the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. The
City of Hugo does not need to develop city -owned and maintained
snowmobile trails. Rather the City should work with residents and
snowmobiling associations to ensure that trails are properly designed,
maintained, and used.
Chapter 7 7-35
Parks, Trails, & Open Spaces
tiaior
5. Equestrian Trails. Horses are an important part of Hugo. Equestrian activities
provide recreation opportunities for many residents and nonresidents. Most
equestrian activities in Hugo occur on private land, but equestrians also ride their
horses on the side of rural roads and on Hardwood Creek Trail. Horses are
considered a legal form of transportation and can use roads throughout the city.
Equestrians have expressed a need for additional horse trails in Hugo. Perhaps
the most effective way for the City to provide horse trails is to construct the trails
in conjunction with City road improvements. Those roads that are most used by
horses should include a minimum 4 -foot wide, level path in the ditch. If road
improvements include an 8 -foot wide paved shoulder, then an additional 4 feet of
unpaved area immediately adjacent to the shoulder could be designated for use
by equestrians. Similar to the snowmobile associations, equestrians should
continue to negotiate with landowners to develop trails on private lands. The
Minnesota Horse Council can provide information on obtaining grant money to
help fund these trails. Equestrian trails, like all trails, must be designed to be safe
and enjoyable for the users. They must also be designed to minimize potential
negative impacts including soil erosion and soil compaction, damage to
vegetation, trespassing, disposal of manure, and conflicts with motor vehicles.
The following guidelines will help the City in planning or evaluating proposed
equestrian trails in Hugo:
a) Involve the Minnesota Horse Council and Hugo's equestrians in the city
road improvement planning process. Where appropriate provide trails
along city roads as road improvements are made.
b) Avoid horse trails in areas where erosion or compaction may be a
problem; for example in creek beds or on steep slopes.
c) Avoid trails in significant natural areas. Heavily used equestrian trails can
compact soil and damage sensitive vegetation.
d) Avoid trails in wetlands or trails that are immediately adjacent to creeks or
lakes where soil erosion and sedimentation may become a problem.
e) Limit where equestrian trails cross roads. Where trails must cross roads,
provide crossings in areas with high visibility and where road traffic can be
controlled. Also provide signs that identify trail crossings.
f) Maintain trails regularly to ensure they are safe.
g) Provide signage as needed to identify trail boundaries and reduce the
potential for trespassing.
6. Nature Paths. The following guidelines will assist the City in designing and
constructing nature paths:
Chapter 7 7-36
Parks, Trails, & Open Spaces
tiaio'
a) Locate nature paths to maximize enjoyment to the user, but minimize
impact to the natural area. For example, set trails away from sensitive
areas, but allow trail users the opportunity to view the area from a
reasonable distance.
b) Minimize the number of areas where paths cross creeks or wetlands, or
where paths traverse steep slopes. Where paths occur in these areas,
provide bridges, boardwalks, and steps to provide a path that is safe to
pedestrians and also sensitive to the natural environment.
c) Limit nature paths to foot traffic only. Do not allow bicycles, snowmobiles,
or horses on nature paths.
d) Provide interpretive signs along the paths. Also provide signs that
encourage people to stay on the paths.
e) Where appropriate provide some seating areas for resting or wildlife
observation.
f) Provide a variety of nature paths that accommodate various users and are
sensitive to the natural environment. For example, provide some paths
that are accessible to physically disabled people. These paths should be
6 -feet wide and paved with an appropriate material like concrete or
bituminous. Other paths may not be fully accessible to all people, but
would be more sensitive to the natural environment. For example, some
nature paths could be as little as 2 -feet wide and covered with wood
mulch.
g) Maintain nature paths to ensure that they are safe.
7. Multi -Use Trails. Hardwood Creek Trail is a multi -use regional trail located on
the abandoned Burlington -Northern Railroad that runs parallel to Highway 61.
The trail begins in Hugo and extends north of Forest Lake. It is possible that one
day the trail could run from St Paul to Duluth. However, several segments of the
railroad have not yet been abandoned and may never be abandoned. One such
segment runs from White Bear Lake to downtown Hugo. This segment will likely
remain active to service Hugo's industrial park. Washington County is
responsible for constructing and maintaining the segment of the trail that runs
through Hugo and Washington County. The following recommendations pertain
to how the City of Hugo should respond to Hardwood Creek Trail:
a) Where possible, tie city trails into Hardwood Creek Trail. This will expand
trail opportunities for Hugo residents.
Chapter 7 7-37
Parks, Trails, & Open Spaces
t0eo
b) Work with the County to provide a trailhead in the downtown area. A
trailhead in the downtown area would help support downtown businesses
and help build Hugo's downtown core.
c) Use Hardwood Creek Trail as a tool to promote Hugo. For example,
encourage horse rides from downtown Hugo to the old school house on
County Road 4A. Or sponsor a running or bicycle event that goes from
downtown Hugo to Forest Lake and back.
d) Consider working with the County to provide plantings along the trail to
make it more scenic and enjoyable. The City should also work with
Washington County to provide a multi -use trail that connects the Bald
Eagle Lake area to downtown Hugo. Also, the City should provide a multi-
use trail that connects to Anoka County and Lino Lakes trails. Specific
locations for these trails should be determined in conjunction with
development plans for southwest Hugo.
Trail funding sources
There are many government and private sources for funding trail development. The City
should contact the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Trails and Waterways
Unit for a detailed list of funding sources. Following is a brief description of possible
funding opportunities:
a) The Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) provides federal
funds that can be used for trail development. Hardwood Creek Trail was
constructed, in part, with ISTEA funds. The City should consider teaming with
Washington, Anoka, and Ramsey Counties to apply for federal funding to provide
multi -use trails that would link Hardwood Creek trail to Ramsey and Anoka
Counties.
b) The State of Minnesota and the Metropolitan Council also appropriate funds
through the county for acquisition and development of regional trails and parks
and may contribute to Hugo's trail building efforts.
c) There are also many private funding sources including foundations and clubs.
For example, the Minnesota Horse Council can provide money for development
of equestrian trails and the National Bicycle and Pedestrian Advocacy Campaign
Grant can provide financial assistance for developing trails.
d) Also volunteers can be used to help build and maintain trails.
Obtaining grants has become very competitive. Therefore, the City of Hugo should
look at ways that they can fund trail development on their own. The City can require
trail dedication as part of the subdivision process. The City can also include trail
Chapter 7 7.38
Parks, Trails, & Open Spaces
H,,.w
ugo
180TH
180TH
180TH
180TH
J
•• •.•
W
O
O177TH
177TH
0
O4
Sidewalks & Trails
,;•'
;
W
' �.. .......,.�...;'
W
z
175
y
175TH
174
it
W
Existing
Z
Z
z
°
City Trail
�•. Z
Horseshoe
=
r
Q.. y .., .. ................
...............u. uw.. n.. u••n.
....
.u. .... v.....• ZALLLL
W
.u....uu.. u.•
nh}OTFf• Y
Regional Trail
9
•
'
Sidewalk
�z •'
•'
W
Snowmobile Trail
��•. ,,.
•♦ LL
"���•
o
165TH
W'
z
Proposed
>.
:......
;
W.
•''S�
.^^••• Regional Trails
;�,Barker
a
',;^'
LL
w
^^ City Trails
,'t
m �S
•
T
c
oneks
=
County Trails
1 56TH
0 •••••••...3....:
•
157TH
7
� 1571
z
T
:
•'554711 . L
0
52ND
1521.1' .....•'
O
N. 152ND_
.... ....:... .. .
IT
z.:
�:
O
1 TH
>w 149TH z
0
14 H
•...:........
:
U
W
1`1C
...... 7 47
2
0
147TH
Afy Rf FL
= o
•.. �j•' : TH
Rice
r
=
l�
Y
••.,,.
N
>
w
•�
.•'' 132ND 2NDE w
o
41 0
f
Y
W E
........;...........
T
140TH
T 1 �GG<A�P
Plaisted
137TH
T�
13613
O
H
1 T
North School Section
oQ
W
�
w
132ND
FRRy
3
o
w
W
South School Sect n
PTH
130TH
z
gtH
2 0
Qq
=:.......................
�'*�..,
H
�
_
•...
=TH
0 0.25 0.5 1
W
¢ �.
J
Sunset O
6
EE N Long
a
Miles
0 TH
5TH
=
of1251
K
:D 0
W
Bald Eagle
z
Y
2w
r
,---------._.._
•,
n
12191 •..,
��
J
Round N W
-�� �•��> °
City of Hugo
.u....ou. ...• ••
.........,.
,a.u.
......... �....
0
' W
y
March 15, 2010