Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2007.03.19 EDA Packet
AGENDA CITY OF HUGO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY MEETING MONDAY, MARCH 19, 2007- 8:30 AM HUGO CITY HALL 8:30 am 1. Call to Order 8:31 am 2. Roll Call 8:32 am 3. Approval of Minutes EDA Meeting of February 20,2007 8:35 am 4. Discussion on Welcoming Service to New Residents in Hugo • Robin Green 8:45 am 5. Discussion on TIF Plan 8:55 am 6. Discussion on EDA Sponsorship to the April 22, 2007 Hugo Kidz `n Biz Fest 9:05 am 7. Update on Washington County Economic Development Strategy Work Group 9:15 am 8. Comprehensive Plan Update • SWOT Exercise— Kendra Lindahl, Landform 10:30 am 9. Adjournment BACKGROUND MEMO FOR THE EDA MEETING OF Monday, March 19, 2007 3. Approval of Minutes EDA meeting of February 20, 2007 City staff recommends that the EDA approve the minutes for the February 20, 2007 EDA meeting as presented. 4. Discussion on Welcoming Service to New Residents in Hugo Robin Green, a resident of Hugo,would like to present a plan to the EDA for a business that would welcome new residents and businesses to the City. The company would be called "Welcome Home Neighbor"and would provide business information, coupons, and pamphlets/brochures to new residents and businesses. The strategy of"Welcome Home Neighbor" is to invite the members of the Hugo Business Association to become active participants in this welcoming service program. Robin Green will be present at the meeting to talk to the EDA about her business plan. 5. Discussion on TIF Plan At the February 20th, 2007 EDA meeting Paul Steinman and Mikaela Huot from Springsted presented the TIF Policy and Plan to the EDA and requested feedback. At the meeting there was great feedback on the policy and plan. The EDA recommend adoption of the policy to the City Council at that meeting. The EDA will need-to - make a motion to recommend adoption of the TIF Plan to the City Council. Staff has attached the TIF Plan. If there are any changes the to the TIF Plan that the EDA would like, the recommendation to adopt the TIF Plan can be made with conditions. 6. Discussion on EDA Sponsorship to the April 22, 2007 Hugo Kidz In Biz Fest On April 22, 2007, the 3rd annual Kidz `n Biz Fest will take place at the Oneka Elementary School. This annual event is an opportunity for the Hugo Business Association and the Hugo EDA to directly connect with Hugo families and children in a PTA carnival atmosphere. The event has grown so big that it was necessary to move it to the super-sized gymnasium at the school. This event is expected to attract more than 400 Hugo children and their families, and will once again feature the chocolate chip cookie contest, as well as an assortment of carnival games presented by Hugo businesses with assistance from the WBL High School and National Honor Society. Last year the EDA and the Hugo Business Association (HBA)co-sponsored the event in the amount of$500. Staff recommends that the EDA make a recommendation to the City Council that the EDA co-sponsor with the HBA for Hugo Kidz `n Biz Fest. 7. Update on Washington County Economic Development Strategy Work Group Mike Ericson, City Administrator,will give an update to the EDA on the Washington County Economic Development Work Group. Attached are documents outlining the progress of the group. 8. Comprehensive Plan Update On February 26th, the City held an open house to gather input from residents about the community vision(i.e. what do they like about Hugo,what can be improved, how do we want the city to look in 20 years, etc.). Approximately 70 residents attended the open house. We asked each resident to complete a 2-page questionnaire about their vision for Hugo. We received 14 written responses as of the date of this report. Attached are the comment sheets and a summary of the comments for your review. The Planning Commission met on March 8th to begin the visioning process through the SWOT (strengths,weaknesses, opportunities, threats) analysis worksheet that was used at the open house. The Planning Commission comments are attached. City Planner, Kendra Lindahl from Landform will be present at the meeting and would like to do the same exercise with the EDA. Attached is a blank SWOT analysis comment sheet for you to fill out. Please come prepared to participate in the SWOT exercise. • MINUTES FOR THE JOINT COUNCILIEDA MEETING OF FEBRUARY 20, 2007 EDA President Fran Miron called the meeting to order at 9:40 am COUNCIL: PRESENT: Frank Puleo, Mike Granger, Fran Miron, Becky Petryk, and Chuck Haas EDA: PRESENT: Jan Arcand, Jim Bever, Tom Denaway, Mike Granger, Phil Klein, and Fran Miron City Administrator Mike Ericson, CD Director Bryan Bear, Associate Planner Rachel Simone ABSENT: Brian Thistle APPROVAL OF MINUTES EDA MEETING OF JANUARY 16, 2007 Granger made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the minutes for the EDA meeting of January 16, 2007. All aye. Motion carried. DISCUSSION ON KIDZ PLACE RENTAL SPACE On September 14, 2006 the City Council approved a site plan for Kidz Place Child Care Center located at 5448 Forest Boulevard North. The building includes a daycare and two spaces for office rentals. The owners of Kidz Place have been approached by the owners of Tasty Asia in Wyoming, MN to possibly acquire both of the spaces for their restaurant. Tasty Asia is a take-out and dine-in restaurant with a bakery. The property is zoned Residential Service and restaurants are prohibited by the ordinance. The owners of Kidz Place feel this use will be compatible with the daycare,the surrounding residential services and the residential areas. Staff agrees with the owners and has been researching this issue for the past week. The property owners and the owners of the restaurant will be present to discuss bringing this business to Hugo. The Staff presented options for the Council and EDA to consider at the meeting. The owners of Kidz Place, Deanna Hudella and Don Hruby, and the owners of Tasty Asia,Diana and Chakib Benzakour,were present at the meeting to give a short presentation and to answer any questions. Bever asked about the size of the proposed restaurant compared to the current one in Wyoming,Minnesota. Diana stated that the proposed restaurant is larger than their current restaurant. Klein asked about the parking and whether they could accommodate to what is required by ordinance. Deanna stated that they have been researching the parking situation but it will have to be worked out with City staff. Miron asked if the impervious surface has been calculated for any new pavement that will be on site for parking. Deanna stated that their architect has done some preliminary calculations on the impervious surface and they feel they will be under the required amount. Bryan stated that the parking will have to be worked on at a later time and needs to be figured out before we get too involved in the process. The issue today is the ordinance change. Denaway stated that a restaurant that does not serve alcohol would be a good fit and the surrounding zoning is residential service. Granger agreed that it would be a good fit but the parking is a big issue. He also asked about the odor from the restaurant to the daycare center and the surrounding properties. Deanna stated that the owners of Tasty Asia have talked about that and will make sure that the ventilation equipment will reflect this issue. Arcand stated she is hopeful for a restaurant in Hugo. Klein agreed that it is a good fit,but parking is an issue that he thinks can be worked out between the owners and the City. Granger made a motion, seconded by Klein, to recommend that Council authorize staff to draft an ordinance amendment to allow a restaurant use in the Residential Service Zoning District. Granger made a motion, seconded by Klein, to amend the first motion to include that the City Council look at other options that were outline in the staff report as examples of solutions. Miron stated that the council has reviewed the other options at this meeting and that this one does seem to be the best option. All nays. Amendment failed. Klein made a motion, seconded by Granger, to recommend that Council authorize staff to draft an ordinance amendment to allow a restaurant use in the Residential Service Zoning District. All ayes. Motion Carried. REVIEW OF TIF POLICY AND PLAN Paul Steinman and Mikaela Huot were at the meeting and presented the TIF policy and plan to the City Council and EDA. They requested input from the EDA and Council on the policy and plan for finalization of the documents. Staff attached the TIF policy and plan for the City Council and EDA's review. Haas asked about the public improvements and whether districts revenues pay for them. Paul Steinman stated that some would be paid with it and some would not. Each project will be reviewed individually to see if it is needed. Petryk asked if improvements were to happen on Highway 61 could TIF revenues be used. Paul Steinman stated that it could be used. Haas asked why the policy requires projects to increase the taxable value three-fold. Paul Steinman stated that this is a way to make sure that projects are up to the City's expectations. CD Director stated that the policy is a guiding document and changes can be made if it does not seem to work as well as we would like. Petryk asked about the terms. Paul Steinman stated that the City should plan for maximum flexibility. Mikaela Huot went over the TIF Plan with the Council and EDA. Haas asked with other districts did we not budget enough money within five years. Paul Steinman stated that we have researched how much revenue will be generated and then looked at how much we would need for public improvements. In addition, there will be annual monitoring. Mikaela Huot stated that they are still working through this issue. Miron talked about the boundaries of the district. Haas asked if they were set in stone as of now. Mikaela Huot stated that they are not set, but will be set at the public hearing on April 2nd, 2007. Arcand asked about the four year rule and if the property does not have a plan in can it be removed. Paul Steinman stated that is true,but it can come back in at current market value. Arcand talked about the importance of the timing of certification of the district. Denaway made a motion, Arcand seconded, to recommend adoption of the TIF policy. All ayes. Motion Carried. ADJOURNMENT COUNCIL: Hass made a motion, Granger seconded to adjourn the City Council meeting at 11:30 am Granger made motion, Bever seconded to adjourn the EDA meeting at 11:30 am All aye. Motion carried. BUSINESS PLAN FOR WELCOME HOME NEIGHBOR (a personalized welcoming service) Welcome Home Neighbor Welcoming Service 1. Executive Summary Welcome Home Neighbor is a welcoming service based out of Hugo, MN. This company will set new standards in the welcome service market by combining personalized service and old fashioned values which will be used to greet and warmly welcome new residents to our city. 1.1 Objectives 1. Make certain every new household receives a welcome bag of information and gifts. This will include new construction purchases, purchases of existing homes, as well as renters. (obtaining this infor- mation can be coordinated with the Hugo City Hall, and possibly area builders, realtors, title companies, lenders/banks, homeowners associations, building owners/managers, etc...) 2. Increase resident awareness of events and activities taking place within the community by providing information and resources. 3. Encourage local business involvement and membership in the HBA, via support and interest in the welcoming service. 4. Have approximately 30% of the businesses that are members of the HBA as active participants in this service, initially; projecting an increase to 50% after 6 months of operation, and 80% after one year. 5. Eventually, include new area businesses in this service: welcome and thank the new business owner for bringing their business to our city and becoming a valuable addition to our group of area businesses. Also, with the help of the City of Hugo, providing information and resources to assist each new business to get "plugged into" our community. 1.2 Mission The mission of Welcome Home Neighbor is to bring back the "small town feel" to the community by making sure that each new resident, whether a new homeowner or renter, is personally welcomed to our city and provided with information on all of the benefits of living here. 1.3 Keys to Success 1. Work with and have the support of the Hugo Business Association, Hugo City Hall, and all interested area businesses. 2. Have a commitment to ensuring each new member of the community is welcomed in a warm and friendly manner, at a time that is convenient to their schedule. 3. Provide each new resident with a welcoming gift bag, complete with area business information, coupons, pamphlets/brochures, as well as some small gifts/promotional items. 2. Company Summary Welcome Home Neighbor is a start-up company that will provide personalized welcoming services to new area residents, along with information on area businesses and services to make their transition to a new city less stressful and more enjoyable. 2.1 Company Ownership This business will start out as a simple proprietorship, owned by Robin Green, and located in Hugo. As the business grows, it will be taken into consideration whether or not to re-register as a corporation or a limited liability company, whichever is in the best interest of the business. Initially, Welcome Home Neighbor will be a home-based business, however, with the growth of this business, the need may arise to relocate the business operation to a more permanent location. If so, that would be addressed at that time. 3.0 Services 1. Personally greet new residents and deliver to them a gift bag. 2. Follow up with the new residents within a month of them receiving the gift bag; either with a phone call, personal visit, or thank you card. 3. Visit area businesses, both established and new, to recruit new participants for the welcoming service and possible new members of the HBA. 4. Provide monthly reports and billing invoices to the participating area businesses. 4.0 Market Analysis Summary As there is no competition in this geographic area in this particular market, Welcome Home Neighbor has the opportunity to make an impact in this industry by providing such a unique and personalized service. Welcome Home Neighbor can "define" what a genuine welcoming service should be. 5.0 Strategy The strategy of Welcome Home Neighbor is to invite the members of the Hugo Business Association to become active participants in this welcoming service program. In addition, Welcome Home Neighbor will visit with other area business owners to offer this service to them, provide them with infor- mation on the HBA, and encourage them to join both the HBA and the wel- coming service program. This gives the local businesses a different avenue, and "fresh" way to promote their business without taking time away from that business. In accomplishing these tasks, it then becomes the goal of Welcome Home Neighbor to personally greet each newcomer to the City of Hugo, and provide them with very helpful information and resources about the city and all that it has to offer. 5.1 Value Propositions Welcome Home Neighbor will offer the following advantages to new area residents: *have a warm, friendly person to personally welcome a new Hugonian to our city; *have a gift bag FULL of area information delivered right to their doorstep, and, as an added bonus, include some gifts from local retailers, encouraging patronage of their business; *have a contact person if any questions or concerns come up after the initial visit. Welcome Home Neighbor will also offer the following advantages to local business owners: *have an individual personally marketing each business by delivering information (ie: coupons, etc...) about that business directly to the hands of a new resident; *provide this unique, personalized service at a very minimal cost. 6.0 Management Team Initially, as this is a home-based business, the Proprietor, Robin Green, will be the one to handle all of the responsibilities of managing the day to day operations of this business. As Welcome Home Neighbor grows and becomes more successful, it may be necessary, at that time, to add individuals to the team in order to maintain the high quality of service being being provided. 7.0 Financials The start-up costs of this business will be very minimal (ie: business cards, promotional flyers). The City of Hugo has agreed to provide the gift bags and their own packet of information, and each business owner that will be participating in this service will be providing their own marketing materials and promotional items to be included in the welcome gift bag. Therefore, unless there is a need for a larger, or different type of gift bag, or possibly moving to a small "gift basket," the initial investment will primarily be time; the time to put the gift bags together, the time to visit the area businesses to collect the items they wish to have in the welcome bags, the time to recruit new businesses to be included in this service, and the time to deliver the gift bags. Welcome Home Neighbor (a personalized welcoming service) r� Program Application Name of Business: Contact Name: Phone #: Address: City/State/Zip: Participant's Contribution to the "welcome" gift bag: (ie: coupons, brochure, etc...) Rate Per Home Visit/Presentation: $ Per Visit/Presentation ALL participants in the Welcome Home Neighbor welcoming service MUST agree to all terms and conditions of this contract in order to be eligible for participation. Welcome Home Neighbor is offered by Robin Green, Proprietor, hereafter referred to as Welcome Home, while your business name will be referred to as Participant. This agreement shall include the following: *Representation of Participant: Welcome Home is engaged in the service of greeting new residents. Robin Green will represent the Participant by visiting with new area residents within the HUGO area. *Service and Reports: Welcome Home will promote all participating businesses during its home visitations; will promote the Participant's advertising message, and will present any promotional merchandise/samples or invitation cards during those home visitations made. Welcome Home will make monthly reports to Participants, listing names, addresses, and phone numbers of those new residents who were presented information on behalf of the Participant. Other demographic information will not be provided to Participants. *Obligation of Participant: Participant agrees not to rent, sell, or otherwise dispose of new resident lists of names reported by Welcome Home. Participants will provide Welcome Home, at its own expense,with promotional merchandise,discount coupons, or other promotional materials necessary so that delivery to the Clients can be made when required. Participant will cooperate with Welcome Home in making its service effective. Participant will defend the Welcome Home program, its agents and employees and hold them harmless from all claims,damages, losses,and expenses including reasonable attorney's fees,with respect to any liability that is asserted against Welcome Home and/or its Proprietor(Robin Green) arising from the quality or character of any of its Participant's services,products, advertising items, or samples. *Payment: The Participant agrees to pay Welcome Home for its services at the rate described above per home visitation, pursuant to this agreement. Payment for services rendered by Welcome Home shall be made payable to Welcome Home Neighbor,by Participant's check,upon receipt of invoice from Welcome Home. Billing will occur on a monthly basis. A late payment fee of 1.5%will be assessed on all delinquent account balances. An account is considered delinquent if payment has not been received by Welcome Home by the next invoice date. *Duration: This contract will continue for a period of 12 months from the date of this contract and thereafter. until either party shall have given the other party 90 days written notification prior to the expiration date. Similar notice shall be given by either party to the other in order to terminate this contract at the end of the 12 month period. The contract will automatically continue if no notice is given. Notice to Welcome Home shall be sent to Robin Green, 7600 165'' Street North,Hugo, MN 55038. *Entire Contract: This contract constitutes the entire understanding and agreement between the parties. It is subject to cancellation only as provided above and may not be altered or varied by oral agreements or representations of any kind. Printed name/title of applicant: Date: Signature of Participant: Please Mail To: Welcome Home Neighbor do Robin Green 7600 165`'St.N. Hugo,MN 55038 Phone: (651)769-4128 E-Mail: robingcloser4u@msn.com Page 1 of 1 Mike Ericson From: Robin Green [robin@commitment-title.com] Sent: Thursday, February 15, 2007 3:41 PM To: Mike Ericson Subject: Welcoming Service business plan Mike, It was nice to meet you the other day at the HBA meeting at the Legion. I appreciate your offer to assist me with putting together a business plan for the welcoming service that I would like to get up and running in Hugo. If this offer is still available, I would like to inquire as to what your schedule looks like for next week? I know you are a very busy person, and I will be as flexible as possible in accommodating your schedule, especially due to the fact that you made such a generous offer. Let me know at your earliest convenience. Thank you again! Enjoy the rest of your week! Robin Green 2/16/07 Message Page 1 of 1 Mike Ericson From: Michele Lindau Sent: Monday, December 11, 2006 4:31 PM To: Mike Ericson; Jodie Guareschi; Eileen Ottney; Chris Petree; Debi Close; Mary Ann Creager Subject: FW: Welcome Services in Hugo Does any one know of one? -----Original Message----- From: Robin Green [ma ilto:robin @comm itment-title.com] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 10:57 AM To: Michele Lindau Subject: Welcome Services in Hugo Hi! My name is Robin Green, and I am a long time resident of Hugo. am considering starting a welcoming service in Hugo, and I was wondering if you are aware of any such existing services to welcome new homeowners to our town? Please let me know at your earliest convenience. Thank you for your time! Sincerely, Robin Green 12/11/06 Z City of Hugo, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing Plan for Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-2 Within Development District No. 1 (Downtown Redevelopment TIF District) Dated: March 1, 2007 (DRAFT) Approved: Prepared by: SPRINGSTED INCORPORATED 380 Jackson Street, Suite 300 St. Paul, MN 55101-2887 (651)223-3000 WWW.SPRINGSTED.COM J TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page(s) A. Definitions..............................................................................................................................................................1 B. Statutory Authorization..........................................................................................................................................1 C. Statement of Need and Public Purpose.................................................................................................................1 D. Statement of Objectives........................................................................................................................................2 E. Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a Redevelopment District,.....................................................3 F. Duration of the TIF District.....................................................................................................................................4 G. Property to be Included in the TIF District..............................................: ............ ...............................................4 H. Property to be Acquired in the TIF District............................... ....................... ......... ..................................4 I. Specific Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District................................... ..............................4 J. Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing..................`.................................................,. ...........................5 K. Estimated Public Costs........ .. .................................................................................................. ......................7 L. Estimated Sources of Revenue............................................. ............................................................................7 M. Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness.............................:.:.........................................................................8 N. Original Net Tax Capacity................. ......... ...................... ............................................................8 O. Original Local Tax Rate................................: .. ....... ........ ' ............................................................8 P. Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment.....................................................9 Q. Use of Tax Increment.....................................................................::.....................................................................9 R. Excess Tax Increment......... ......... .,........ .....`.... ..................... ..........................................................10 S. Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule........ .......................................................................................11 T. Limitation on Administrative Expenses...............................................................................................................11 U. Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements- Four Year Rule...............................................................12 V. Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions..................................................................................................12 W. Prior Planned Improvements...._..........................................................................................................................12 X. Development Agreements........... .. ....................................................................................................................13 Y. Assessment Agreements. .::............ .................................................................................................................13 Z. Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan.............................................................................................13 AA. Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan............................................................................................14 AB. Filing TIF Plan,Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements.....................................................................15 Map of the Tax Increment Financing District...........................................................................................EXHIBIT I Map of Development District...................................................................................................................EXHIBIT I Boundaries of Tax Increment Financing District.....................................................................................EXHIBIT II AssumptionsReport..............................................................................................................................EXHIBIT III Projected Tax Increment Report............................................................................................................EXHIBIT IV Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report.........................................................................EXHIBIT V Market Value Analysis Report...............................................................................................................EXHIBIT VI Redevelopment District Findings..........................................................................................................EXHIBIT VII City of Hugo, Minnesota Section A Definitions The terms defined in this section have the meanings given herein, unless the context in which they are used indicates a different meaning: "Authority"means the Hugo Economic Development Authority. "Cit ""means the City of Hugo, Minnesota;also referred to as a"Municipality". "City Council"means the City Council of the City. "County"means Washington County, Minnesota. "Development District" means Development District No. 1 in the City, which is described in the corresponding Development Program. "Development Program"means the Development Program for the.Development District. "Prosect Area"means the geographic area of the Development District. "School District"means Independent School District No.624, Minnesota. "State"means the State of Minnesota. "TIF Act"means Minnesota Statutes,Sections 469.174 through 469.1799, both inclusive. "TIF District"means Tax Increment Financing(Redevelopment)District No. 1-2. "TIF Plan"means the tax increment financing plan for the TIF District(this document). Section B Statutory Authorization Within the City areas exist where public involvement is necessary to cause development or redevelopment to occur. The City has certain statutory powers pursuant to the TIF Act to assist in financing eligible activities related to these development needs. This Section contains the Tax Increment Financing Plan for District No. 1-2. Other relevant information is contained in the Development Program for Development District No. 1. Section C Statement of Need and Public Purpose The City finds that there is a'need for development and redevelopment within the City and Project Area in order to provide employment and housing opportunities,to improve the local tax base, and to improve the general economy of the City and State. The economic security of the people in the City depends upon proper development of property that meets any one of a number of conditions, including properties whose values are too low to pay for the public services required or rendered and properties whose lack of use or improper use has resulted in stagnant or unproductive land that could otherwise contribute to the public health, safety, and welfare. The City finds that in many cases such property cannot be developed without public participation and assistance in various forms including property acquisition and/or write-down, proper planning, the financing of development costs associated with clearance, grading and soils correction, and the making of various other public and private improvements necessary for development. In cases where the redevelopment of property cannot be done by private SPRINGSTED Pagel City of Hugo, Minnesota enterprise alone,the City believes it to be in the public interest to consider the exercise of its powers, to advance and spend public money,and to provide the means and impetus for such redevelopment. The City finds that in certain cases property within the Project Area would or may not be available for redevelopment without the specific financial aid to be sought, that the Development Program will afford maximum opportunity, consistent with the needs of the City as a whole, for the development of the Project Area by private enterprise, and that the Development Program conforms to the general plan for the development of the City as a whole. Section D Statement of Objectives The City seeks to achieve one or more of the following objectives with respect to the Project Area, as the City may deem appropriate and necessary. (1) To promote and secure the prompt development and redevelopmentof property within the Project Area, such property which is not now in its most productive use, in a manner consistent with the Comprehensive Plan of the City,thus realizing Comprehensive Plan,landuse,and tax base goals. (2) To assist development in the Project Area through the acquisition or write-down of.certain interests in property which is not now in productive use or in its highest,and best use, to make or defray the cost of soil corrections or site improvements'on said property to clear the property of blighted buildings, and to construct or reimburse for the construction of public improvements and other facilities on or for the benefit of said property, thereby promoting and securing the development of other land within the Project Area: (3) To retain local jobs and/or increase the number and diversity of jobs that offer stable employment and/or attractive wages and benefits. (4) To provide funding for an ongoing development strategy and to prioritize the use of available resources. (5) To implement and revise from time to time, as may be deemed necessary or desirable, a consolidated and unified Development Program and to finance the associated development costs on an area-wide basis. (6) To employ any of the powers of the City for the benefit of the Project Area in such cases and upon such terms as the City may deem appropriate. (7) To construct or acquire facilities deemed desirable for the development of the Project Area. (8) T,o encourage additional unsubsidized private development in the area, either directly or indirectly through"spin off"development. (9) To facilitate the development process and to achieve development on sites which would not otherwise be developed but/for the use of Tax Increment Financing. District No. 1-2 is a redevelopment district with 1 contiguous site. The total district consists of 125 parcels of land and adjacent and internal rights-of-way. District No. 1-2 is created to facilitate achieving the objectives set forth in the Development Program for Development District No. 1.The objectives expected to be achieved through the use of tax increment financing include, but are not limited to, removal of barriers to development, redevelopment, creation of jobs,creation of life cycle housing, and expansion of the tax base. SPRINGSTED Page 2 City of Hugo, Minnesota The activities contemplated in the present Development Program and Tax Increment Financing Plan do not preclude the undertaking of other qualified redevelopment activities. These activities are anticipated to occur over the life of the District. Section E Designation of Tax Increment Financing District as a Redevelopment District Redevelopment districts are a type of tax increment financing district in which one or more of the following conditions exists and is reasonably distributed throughout the district: (1) parcels comprising at least 70%of the area of the district are occupied by buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots, or other similar structures and more than 501k of the buildings, not including outbuildings, are structurally substandard requiring substantial renovation or clearance. A parcel is deemed "occupied" if at least 15% of the area of the parcel contains buildings, streets, utilities, paved or gravel parking lots;or other similar structures. (2) the property consists of vacant, unused, underused,inappropriately used, or infrequently used railyards, rail storage facilities, or excessive or vacated railroad right-of-ways;or (3) tank facilities, or property whose immediately previous use was for tank facilities, as defined in section 115C.02,subdivision 15, if the tank facilities: (i) have or had a capacity of more than 1,000,000 gallons; (ii) are located adjacent to rail facilities;and (iii) have been removed or`are unused, underused,inappropriately used,or infrequently used. For districts consisting of two more noncontiguous areas, each area must individually qualify under the provisions listed above,as well as the entire area must also qualify as a whole. The TIF District qualifies as a redevelopment district in that it meets all of the criteria listed in (1) above. The supporting facts and documentation for this determination are summarized in Exhibit VII and will be retained by the City for the life of the TIF District and are available to the public upon request. "Structurally substandard"is defined as buildings containing defects or deficiencies in structural elements, essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation,fire protection (including egress), layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors. Generally, a building is not structurally substandard if it is in compliance with the building code applicable to a new building, or could be modified to satisfy the existing code at a cost of less than 15%of the cost of constructing anew structure of the same size and type. A city may not find that a building is structurally substandard without an interior inspection, unless it can not gain access to the property and there exists evidence which supports the structurally substandard finding. Such evidence includes recent fire or police inspections, on-site property tax appraisals or housing inspections, exterior evidence of deterioration, or other similar reliable evidence. Written documentation of the findings and reasons why an interior inspection was not conducted must be made and retained. A parcel is deemed to be occupied by a structurally substandard building if the following conditions are met: (1) the parcel was occupied by a substandard building within three years of the filing of the request for certification of the parcel as part of the district; (2) the demolition or removal of the substandard building was performed or financed by the City, or was performed by a developer under a development agreement with the City, (3) the City found by resolution before such demolition or removal occurred that the building was structurally substandard and that the City intended to include the parcel in the TIF district,and SPRINGSTED Page 3 City of Hugo, Minnesota (4) the City notifies the county auditor that the original tax capacity of the parcel must be adjusted upon filing the request for certification of the tax capacity of the parcel as part of a district. In the case of(4)above, the County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the parcel to be the greater of (a)the current tax capacity of the parcel, or (b) a computed tax capacity of the parcel using the estimated market value of the parcel for the year in which the demolition or removal occurred, and the appropriate classification rate(s) for the current year. At least 90 percent of the tax increment from a redevelopment district must be used to finance the cost of correcting conditions that allow designation as a redevelopment district. These costs include,,but are not limited to, acquiring properties containing structurally substandard buildings or improvements or hazardous substances, pollution, or contaminants, acquiring adjacent parcels necessary to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development, demolition and rehabilitation of structures, clearing of land, removal of hazardous substances or remediation necessary to develop the land, and installation of utilities, roads, sidewalks, and`parking facilities for the site. The allocated administrative expenses of the City may be included in the qualifying costs. Section F Duration of the TIF District Redevelopment districts may remain in existence 25 years from the date of receipt by the City of the first tax increment. Modifications of this plan(see Section 2)shall not extend these fimitations. The City reserves the right to allow the TIF Distal.to remain in existence the maximum duration allowed by law (projected to be through the year 2035 if no inffatioriary increment is received in 2009 however, if that increment is received in 2009 the last year of the district will be 2034), and anticipates that the TIF District may be active for the maximum duration allowed(see Section P), however,the City wi# tify the TIF District as early as possible should the projected increment be received in a shorter time period than`originaHy, projected. All tax increments from taxes payable in the year the TIF District is decertified shall be paid to the City. Section G Property to be Included in TIF District The TIF District is an approximate 93 acre area of land located within the Project Area. A map showing the location of the TIF Distract is shown in Exhibit I. The boundaries and area encompassed by the TIF District are described in Exhibit IL Section H Property to be Acquired in the TIF District The City may acquire and sell any or all of the property located within the TIF District. The City anticipates acquiring available property within the district at any time,and may also finance the direct acquisition of land by the Developer. Section I Specific,Development Expected to Occur Within the TIF District The anticipated development is defined within a study completed by Maxfield Research Inc. in December 2005 entitled An Analysis of the Mafket Potential for Housing, Retail, and Office Uses in Downtown Hugo, Minnesota. The Maxfield study includes the redevelopment of certain properties within the defined district including the construction of approximately 399 to 592 residential housing units,up to 145,500 square feet of retail and 37,700 square feet of office space. The City has been acquiring properties that have previously been found to be substandard within the district and demolishing them in preparation for such redevelopment. The existing buildings that been acquired have been inspected and found to be substandard by resolution. Several of those buildings have since been removed and the site cleared for construction of new development. SPRINGSTED Page 4 City of Hugo, Minnesota Additional inspections have occurred on the remaining buildings in the proposed TIF district in 2006. See Exhibit VII. The City anticipates using tax increment to reimburse itself for a portion of the eligible public improvement costs including acquisition,demolition,site improvements, and related administrative costs. The size of the proposed District makes it difficult to estimate with any certainty the years that various types of development will occur within such District. It is likely that multiple projects will occur through many years of the district. The projects forecasted within the Maxfield study are expected to be fully constructed through 2015. Although the City has been approached by several developers indicating some level of interest in redevelopment of specific parcels within the District, at the time this document was prepared there were no signed construction contracts with regard to the above described development. Section J Findings and Need for Tax Increment Financing In establishing the TIF District,the City makes the following findings: (1) The TIF District qualifies as a redevelopment district-, The City of Hugo retained the services of three experienced City building officials to inspect and evaluate property within the proposed Tax Increment Financing District No 1-2 to be established by the City. The purpose of°the evaluations was to determine if the proposed district met the statutory requirements for coverage and if the buildings met the qualifications required for a,Redevelopment District. The final report has been, prepared by the officials for the City to retain on file in City offices for,public inspection. The,report'cantains the details of the findings summarized below:regarding the substandard gtralifications: • parcels consisting of 79.36 percent of the area of the proposed TIF District are occupied,exceeding the 70 percent coverage test; • 59.3$'percont„of the buildings in the proposed District contain code deficiencies exceeding the 15 percent threshold; • at least 59.38 percent of the buildings are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance, because of defects in structural elements or a combination of deficiencies in essential utilities and facilities, light and ventilation, fire protection including adequate egress, layout and condition of interior partitions, or similar factors which defects or deficiencies are of sufficient total significance to justify substantial renovation or clearance, exceeding the more than 50 percent substandard test; and • the substandard buildings are reasonably distributed throughout the geographic area of the proposed TIF District. These findings are described more completely in Exhibit VII. (2) The proposed development, in the opinion of the City, would not reasonably be expected to occur solely through private investment within the reasonably foreseeable future and the increased market value of the site that could reasonably be expected to occur without the use of tax increment financing would be less than the increase in the market value estimated to result from the proposed development after subtracting the present value of the projected tax increments for the maximum duration of the district permitted by the TIF Plan. Factual basis: Proposed development not expected to occur.- SPRINGSTED Page 5 City of Hugo, Minnesota The proposed redevelopment consists of the acquisition and demolition of substandard buildings within the proposed TIF District boundaries in the City of Hugo for development of new residential life cycle housing, retail commercial space, and office units. Such redevelopment requires assembly of multiple parcels which are under multiple ownership in the TIF District,demolition and clearance of the assembled area,with significant site costs, which together make the total cost of this effort significantly higher than costs reasonably incurred for similar developments on a dean site. The City anticipates analyzing future developer's proformas in detail to determine the minimal amount of assistance needed to compensate developer for these extraordinary costs. No higher market value expected: This finding is based on the fact that no other development of comparablg scope to the proposed development is practical without the same type of assistance described in this plan. WN16=some of the substandard buildings have been demolished as of the date of this plan, most of the extraordinayosts remain (or would need to be reimbursed). Smaller, piecemeal developments in this area might`be feasible, Ib any large-scale development that would create the market value expected under the current proposal would require significant assistance, as bome out by the City's analysis of the preliminary developer discussions. Moreover, this is a downtown redevelopment project in the City with many buildings requiring significant assemblage, demolition and site improvements prior to development opportunities.There is no basis for expectation that the area would redevelop in any significant way purely by private action without public subsidy. To summarize the basis for the Citys findings regarding altemative market value, in accordance with Minnesota Statutes,Section 469.175,Subd.3(d),the City makes the following determinations: a. The City's estimate of the amount by which the market value of the site will increase without the use of tax increment financing is anywhere from$0 to some'modest amount based on small scale development that could be possible without assistance;any estimated values would be too speculative to ascertain, b. if the proposed development to be assisted with tax increment occurs in the District, the total increase in market value would be approximately$260,390,671,including the value of the building(See Exhibit III). C. The present value of tax increments from the District for the maximum duration of the district permitted bithe TIF Plan is estimated to be$118,466,937(See Exhibit VI) d. Even 9 some development other than the proposed development were to occur, the Council finds that no alternative would occur that would produce a market value increase greater than $241,923,734(the,amount in clause b less the amount in clause c)without tax increment assistance. (3) The.TIF Plan willafford maximum opportunity, consistent with the sound needs of the City as a whole;for development of the Project Area by private enterprise. Factual basis: The anticipated redevelopment cited in the Maxfield study may include the construction of up to 592 units of residential development, 145,500 square feet of retail, and 37,700 square feet of office space in the Project Area that is expected to create substantial new tax base for the City and the state, as well as expected future private development. The development clearty meets the City's housing and redevelopment goals of creating additional housing opportunities,and meeting the City's goal of the removal of blight. (4) The TIF Plan conforms to general plans for development of the City as a whole. Factual basis: The City Planning Commission has determined that the development proposed in the TIF Plan conforms to the City comprehensive plan. SPRINGSTED Page 6 City of Hugo, Minnesota (5) The City does not elect the method of tax increment computation set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 469.177,Subdivision 3(b);therefore subdivision 3(a)shall apply which indicates the original net tax capacity and the current net tax capacity shall be determined before the application of the fiscal disparity provisions(see method(a)in Section P). Section K Estimated Public Costs The estimated public costs of the TIF District are listed below. Such costs are eligible for reimbursement from tax increments of the TIF District. Land/Building acquisition 3,000,000 Site Improvements/Preparation costs 4,000,000 Installation of public utilities 2,000,000 Demolition/Relocation 2,000,000 Streets and sidewalks 5,000,000 Public parking facilities 2,OOQ,000 Total Estimated Public Improvements 18,000;000 Bond principal payments 18,000,000 Bond interest payments 19,500,000 Loan Principal payments 0 Loan Interest payments 0 Administrative expenses 4,500,000 Total $60,000,000 The City reserves the right to administratively adjust the amount of any of the items listed above or to incorporate additional eligible items, so long as the total'estimated public cost is not increased. The estimated cost of capitalized interest is included in the loan interest payment amount. The:City reserves the right to spend available tax increment outside of the TIF District boundaries and within the project area: Section L Estimated Sources of Revenue Tax Increment revenue $44,000,000 Interest on invested funds Bond proceeds 15,000,000 Loan proceeds Real estate sales. 1,000,000 Special assessments Rent/Lease revenue Grants Other Total $60,000,000 The City anticipates using future tax increments for reimbursement of public costs incurred from Section K. As increments are collected from the TIF District in future years, a portion of these taxes will be reserved by the City as reimbursement for public costs incurred (primarily land acquisition), either through internal funding or general obligation or revenue debt. The City also anticipates providing financial assistance to the proposed development through the use of a pay-as-you-go technique. As tax increments are collected from the TIF District in future years, a SPRINGSTED Page 7 City of Hugo, Minnesota portion of these taxes will be distributed to the developer/owner as reimbursement for public costs incurred that relate to redevelopment of the project site. The City reserves the right to finance any or all public costs of the TIF District using pay-as-you-go assistance, internal funding, general obligation or revenue debt, or any other financing mechanism authorized by law. The City also reserves the right to use other sources of revenue legally applicable to the Project Area to pay for such costs including, but not limited to,special assessments, utility revenues,federal or state funds, and investment income. Section M Estimated Amount of Bonded Indebtedness The City may issue tax increment bonds to finance all or a portion of the estimated public costs of the TIF District in an amount not to exceed$18,000,000. Section N Original Net Tax Capacity The County Auditor shall certify the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. This value will be equal to the total net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District as certified by the State Commissioner of Revenue. For districts certified between January 1 and June 30, inclusive, this value is based on the previous assessment year. For districts certified between July 1 and December 31,inclusive,this value is teased on the current assessment year. Some parcels within the boundaries of the district,contained buildings that were demolished (see Exhibit VII for additional detail). The greater of the current net tax capacity or the estimated market value of the parcel for the year in which the buildings were removed, applying class rates for the current year must be used to calculate the original net tax capacity. Therefore, upon establishment of the TIFDistrict,and subsequent reclassification of property, it is estimated that the market value of all property within the proposed TIF district boundaries as of January 2, 2006, for taxes payable in 2007, or in the year the buildings were.removed, will`be $27,740,300 and the original net tax capacity of the TIF Distract will be approximately$427,74:1 Each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount that the original net tax capacity has increased or decreased as a result of: (1) changes in the tax-exempt status of property; (2) reductions or enlargements of the geographic area of the TIF District; (3) changes due to stipulation agreements or abatements;or (4) changes in property classification rates. Section 0 Original Local Tax Rate The County Auditor shall also certify the original local tax rate of the TIF District. This rate shall be the sum of all local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District. This rate shall be for the same taxes payable year as the original net tax capacity. In future years,the amount of tax increment generated by the TIF District will be calculated using the lesser of(a)the sum of the current local tax rates at that time or(b)the original local tax rate of the TIF District. At the time this document was prepared, the sum of the final local tax rates that apply to property in the TIF District, for taxes levied in 2006 and payable in 2007, was not yet available. When this total becomes available, the County Auditor shall certify this amount as the original tax capacity rate of the TIF District. For purposes of estimating the tax SPRINGSTED Page 8 City of Hugo, Minnesota increment generated by the TIF District,the sum of the preliminary local tax rates for taxes levied in 2005 and payable in 2006, is 82.985%as shown below. 2006/2007 Taxing Jurisdiction Local Tax Rate City of Hugo 35,931% Washington County 25.651% ISD#624 17.731% Other 3.672% Total 82.985% Section P Projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity and Projected Tax Increment The City anticipates that the redevelopment will be completed by,December 31,2015, creating a-total tax capacity for TIF District No. 1-2 of$2,428,166 as of January 2,2016. Ttie baptured tax capacity as of that date is estimated to be $2,000,425 and the first full year of tax increment is estimated to be $1,660,053 payable in 2017. A complete schedule of estimated tax increment from the TIF District is shown in Exhibit IV. The estimates shown in this TIF Plan assume that residential class rates remain at 1.0% of the estimated market value under$500,000 and 1.25%of the estimatedm7rket.value above$500,000, rental class rates remain at 1.25%, commercial class rates remain at 1.5%for the first$150,000 ofestimatedmarket value and 2.0%of the market value above$150,000. The projections also assume a 2:5%annual increase in marketvalues. Each year the County Auditor shall determine the current net tax capacity of all property in the TIF District. To the extent that this total exceeds the original net tax capacity, the difference shall be known as the captured net tax capacity of the TIF District For communities affected"by the fiscal disparity provisions of Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 473E and Chapter 276A, the original net tax capacity of the TIF District shall,bedeterminedbefore the application of fiscal disparity. In subsequent years, the current net',tax;capacity shall dither'(a)be determined before the application of fiscal disparity or (b)exclude the product of any fiscal disparity increase in the TIF District(since the original net tax capacity was certified)times the appropriate fiscal disparity ratio. The method the City elects shall remain the same for the life of the TIF District, except that a single change may be made at any time from method(a) to method(b) above. ))The City elects method(a),or M.S.Section 469.177,Subdivision 3(a). The County Auditor shall certify to the City the amount of captured net tax capacity each year. The City may choose to retain any or all of this amount. It is the City's intention to retain 100%of the captured net tax capacity of the TIF Distract. Such amount shall be known as the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. Exhibit III gives a listing`of the various information and assumptions used in preparing a number of the exhibits contained in this TIF Plan, including Exhibit IV which shows the projected tax increment generated over the anticipated life of the TIF District. Section Q Use of Tax Increment Each year the County Treasurer shall deduct 0.36%of the annual tax increment generated by the TIF District and pay such amount to the State's General Fund. Such amounts will be appropriated to the State Auditor for the cost of financial reporting and auditing of tax increment financing information throughout the state. Exhibit IV shows the projected deduction for this purpose over the anticipated life of the TIF District. SPRINGSTED Page 9 City of Hugo, Minnesota The City has determined that it will use 100° of the remaining tax increment generated by the TIF District for any of the following purposes: (1) pay for the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section K) and County administrative costs associated with the TIF District(see Section T); (2) pay principal and interest on tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District; (3) accumulate a reserve securing the payment of tax increment bonds or other bonds issued to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District; (4) pay all or a portion of the county road costs as may be required by the County Board under M.S. Section 469.175,Subdivision 1a;or (5) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City,County and School District. Tax increments from property located in one county must be expended for the direct and primary benefit of a project located within that county, unless both county boards involved waive this requirement. Tax increments shall not be used to circumvent levy limitations applicable to the City. Tax increment shall not be used to finance the acquisition, construction, renovation, operation, or maintenance of a building to be used primarily and regularly for conducting the business of amunicipality,county,school district, or any other local unit of government or the State or federal government,or for a' commons area used as a public park,or a facility used for social, recreational, or conference purposes. This prohibition does not apply to the construction or renovation of a parking structure or of a privately owned facility for conference purposes. If there exists any type of agreement or arrangement providing for the developer,or other beneficiary of assistance,to repay all or a portion of the assistance that*as paid or financed with tax increments,such payments shall be subject to all of the restrictions imposed on the use of tax increments. Assistance includes sale of property at less than the cost of acquisition or fair market value, grants, ground or other leases at less then fair market rent, interest rate subsidies, utility service connections, roads, or other, similar assistance that would otherwise be paid for by the developer or beneficiary.. Section R Excess Tax Increment In any year in which the tax increments from the TIF District exceed the amount necessary to pay the estimated public costs authorized by the TIF Plan,the City shall use the excess tax increments to: (1) prepay any outstanding tax increment bonds; (2) discharge the pledge of tax increments thereof,- (3) hereof;(3) pay amounts into an escrow account dedicated to the payment of the tax increment bonds;or (4) return excess tax increments to the County Auditor for redistribution to the City,County and School District. The County Auditor must report to the Commissioner of Education the amount of any excess tax increment redistributed to the School District within 30 days of such redistribution. SPRINGSTED Page 10 City of Hugo, Minnesota Section S Tax Increment Pooling and the Five Year Rule At least 75%of the tax increments from the TIF District must be expended on activities within the district or to pay for bonds used to finance the estimated public costs of the TIF District (see Section E for additional restrictions). No more than 25%of the tax increments may be spent on costs outside of the TIF District but within the boundaries of the Project Area,except to pay debt service on credit enhanced bonds. All administrative expenses are considered to have been spent outside of the TIF District. Tax increments are considered to have been spent within the TIF District if such amounts are: (1) actually paid to a third party for activities performed within the TIF District within five years after certification of the district; (2) used to pay bonds that were issued and sold to a third party, the proceeds of which are reasonably expected on the date of issuance to be spent within the later of the five-year period or a reasonable temporary penod or are deposited in a reasonably required reserve or replacement fund. (3) used to make payments or reimbursements to,a third party under binding,contracts for activities performed within the TIF District, which were.eritered into within five years after certification of the district;or (4) used to reimburse a party for payment of eligible costs(inckiding interest)incurred within five years from certification of the district. Beginning with the sixth year following certification of the TIF District,at least75%of the tax increments must be used to pay outstanding bonds or make contractual payments obligated within the first five years. When outstanding bonds have been defeased and sufficient money has been set aside to pay for such contractual obligations, the TIF District must be decertified. The City anticipates that tax increments will be spent outside of the TIF District (including a portion for allowable administrative expenses)for transportation,redevelopment and affordable housing qualified pooling expenditures. Section T Limitation on Administrative Expenses Administrative expenses are defined as all costs of the City other than: (;1) amounts paid for the purchase of land; (2) amounts paid for materials and services, including architectural and engineering services directly connected with the physical development of the real property in the project; (3) relocation benefits paid to, or services provided for, persons residing or businesses located in the project;' (4) amounts used to pay principal or interest on, fund a reserve for, or sell at a discount bonds issued pursuant to section 469.178;or (5) amounts used to pay other financial obligations to the extent those obligations were used to finance costs described in clause(1)to(3). Administrative expenses include amounts paid for services provided by bond counsel, fiscal consultants, planning or economic development consultants, and actual costs incurred by the County in administering the TIF District. Tax increments may be used to pay administrative expenses of the TIF District up to the lesser of (a) 10% of the total estimated public costs authorized by the TIF Plan or(b) 10%of the total tax increment expenditures for the project. SPRINGSTED Page 11 City of Hugo, Minnesota Section U Limitation on Property Not Subject to Improvements-Four Year Rule If after four years from certification of the TIF District no demolition, rehabilitation, renovation, or qualified improvement of an adjacent street has commenced on a parcel located within the TIF District, then that parcel shall be excluded from the TIF District and the original net tax capacity shall be adjusted accordingly. Qualified improvements of a street are limited to construction or opening of a new street, relocation of a street, or substantial reconstruction or rebuilding of an existing street. The City must submit to the County Auditor, by February 1 of the fifth year,evidence that the required activity has taken place for each parcel in the TIF District. If a parcel is excluded from the TIF District and the City or owner of the parcel subsequently commences any of the above activities, the City shall certify to the County Auditor that such activity 4w,commenced and the parcel shall once again be included in the TIF District. The County Auditor shall certify tha neE.tax capacity of the parcel,as most recently certified by the Commissioner of Revenue, and add such amount to,the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. Section V Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Exhibit V shows the estimated impact on other taxing jurisdictions if the maximum projected retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District was hypothetically available to the other taxing jurisdicfions. The City believes that there will be no adverse impact on other taxing jurisdictions during the life of the TIF District, since the proposed development would not have occurred without,the establishment of the TIF District and the provision of public assistance. A positive impact on other taxing juriscGctions will occur when the TIF District is decertified and the development therein becomes part of the generaf,ax base: The fiscal and economic implications of the proposed tax increment financing district, as pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,Section 469.175,Subdivision 2 are listed below. 1. The total amount of tax incremerd,that will be;generated over the life of the district is estimated to be $43,936,950. 2. To the extent the project in TIF District 1`-2 generates any public cost impacts on city-provided services such as police and fire protection, public infrastructure, and the impact of any general obligation tax increment bonds attributable to the district upon the ability to issue other debt for general fund purposes, such costs will be levied upon the taxable net tax capacity of the City,excluding that portion captured by the District. 3. 'The amount of tax increments over the life of the district that would be attributable to school district levies, assuming the school district's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same, is estimated to be$9,387,794. 4. The amount of tax increments over the life of the district that would be attributable to county levies, assuming the county's share of the total local tax rate for all taxing jurisdictions remained the same is estimated to be$13,581,090. 5. No additional information has been requested by the county or school district that would enable it to determine additional costs that will accrue to it due to the development proposed for the district. Section W Prior Planned Improvements Various permits have been issued for a property within the TIF District within the last 18 months and are listed below: PID Address Date Issued Valuation Permit# 2003121240065 5582146th St N 9/11/2006 2,000.00 2006-01730 SPRINGSTED Page 12 City of Hugo, Minnesota 2003121310022 14235 Forest Blvd N 8/22/2006 52,000.00 2006-01665 2003121310007 14497 Forest Blvd N 9/28/2006 1,000.00 2006-01833 2003121240026 573714Th St N 8/22/2006 2,000.00 2006-01664 2003121240026 573714Th St N 9/12/2006 1,200.00 2006-01758 2003121240025 5697147'"St N 9/12/2005 2,000.00 2005-02643 2003121240026 5737 1471h St N 11118/2005 10,000.00 2005-03503 2003124240026 573714Th St N 10118/2005 2,000.00 2005-03140 2003121330071 5448140'h St The Authority will accompany its request for certification to the County Auditor(or notice of district enlargement),with a listing of such properties within the TIF District for which building permits have been issued during the 18 months immediately preceding approval of the TIF Plan. The County Auditor shall increase the original net tax capacity of the TIF District by the net tax capacity of each improvement for which a building permit was issued. However the Authority does not believe the issuance of the permits will have a significant impact on the original net tax capacity of the District. Section X Development Agreements If within a project containing a redevelopment district, more than 25%of the acreage of the property to be acquired by the City is purchased with tax increment bonds proceeds(to which tax Jncrement from the property is pledged), then prior to such acquisition, the City must enter intoan agreement for the development of the property. Such agreement must provide recourse for the City should the development not be completed. The City anticipates entering into individual agreements for development as projects occur, and anticipates acquiring property located within the TIF District..; Section Y Assessment Agreements The City may, upon entering into a development agreement, also enter into an assessment agreement with the developer, which establishes a minimum market value of the land and improvements for each year during the life of the TIF District. The assessment agreement shall be presented to the County or City Assessor who shall review the plans and specifications for the improvements to be constructed, review the market value previously assigned to the land, and so long as the minimum market value contained in the assessment agreement appears to be an accurate estimate, shall certify the assessment agreement as reasonable. The assessment agreement shall be filed for record in the office of the County Recorder of each county where the property is located. Any modification or premature termination of this agreement must first be approved by the City,County and School District. The City reserves the right to enter into an assessment agreement for individual projects. Section Z Modifications of the Tax Increment Financing Plan Any reduction or enlargement in the geographic area of the Project Area or the TIF District; a determination to capitalize interest on the debt if that determination was not part of the original TIF Plan, increase in the portion of the captured net tax capacity to be retained by the Authority; increase in the total estimated public costs;or designation of property to be acquired by the Authority shall be approved only after satisfying all the necessary requirements for approval of the original TIF Plan. This paragraph does not apply if: (1) the only modification is elimination of parcels from the TIF District; and SPRINGSTED Page 13 City of Hugo, Minnesota (2) the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated equals or exceeds the net tax capacity of those parcels in the TIF District's original net tax capacity, or the City agrees that the TIF District's original net tax capacity will be reduced by no more than the current net tax capacity of the parcels eliminated. The City must notify the County Auditor of any modification that reduces or enlarges the geographic area of the TIF District. The geographic area of the TIF District may be reduced but not enlarged after five years following the date of certification. Section AA Administration of the Tax Increment Financing Plan Upon adoption of the TIF Plan, the City shall submit a copy of such plan to the Minnesota Department of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor. The City shall also request that the County-Auditor certify the original net tax capacity and net tax capacity rate of the TIF District. To assist the County Auditor in this process, the City shall submit copies of the TIF Plan, the resolution establishing the TIF District and adopting the TIF Plan, and a listing of any prior planned improvements. The City shall also send the County Assessor any,,,assessment agreement establishing the minimum market value of land and improvements in the TIF District, and shall request that the County Assessor review and certify this assessment agreement'as reasonable. The County shall distribute to the City the amount of tax increment as it becomes available. The amount of tax increment in any year represents the applicable property taxes generated by the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. The amount of tax increment may change due to development anticipated by the TIF Plan, other development, inflation of property values,or changes in property classification rates or formulas. In administering and implementing the TIF Plan,the following actions should occur on an annual basis: (1) prior to July 1,the City shall notify the County Assessor of any new development that has occurred in the TIF District during the past year to insure that the new value will be recorded in a timely manner. (2) if the County Auditor receives the request for certification of a new TIF District,or for modification of an existing TIF District,before July 1, the request shall be recognized in determining local tax rates for the current and subsequent levy years. Requests received on or after July 1 shall be used to determine local tax rates in subsequent years. (3) each year the County Auditor shall certify the amount of the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The-amount certified shall reflect any changes that occur as a result of the following: (a) the value of property that changes from tax-exempt to taxable shall be added to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. The reverse shall also apply; (b) the original net tax capacity may be modified by any approved enlargement or reduction of the TIF District; (c) if laws governing the classification of real property cause changes to the percentage of estimated market value to be applied for property tax purposes,then the resulting increase or decrease in net tax capacity shall be applied proportionately to the original net tax capacity and the retained captured net tax capacity of the TIF District. The County Auditor shall notify the City of all changes made to the original net tax capacity of the TIF District. SPRINGSTED Page 14 City of Hugo, Minnesota Section AB Filing TIF Plan, Financial Reporting and Disclosure Requirements The City will file the TIF Plan, and any subsequent amendments thereto,with the Commissioner of Revenue and the Office of the State Auditor pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,Section 469.175, subdivision 4A. The City will comply with all reporting requirements for the TIF District under Minnesota Statutes,Section 469.175, subdivisions 5 and 6. 95-, �J[e Z bid Yp °iII�aRi>`3.. SPRINGSTED Page 15 Yt • 1 r �j -7 a ffu+ T-7 17 .r; �y r� o, y • rn (� �. '; IAT & Exhibit 1 MAP OF DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT NO.1 ! « « u � 9 a0V1 F ;...........a.,l'"Z..a,r;M... .««_ __._ 'bt.c.. ... ,.. �......... R _'11:Mo k i + City of Hugo,Minnesota • - 6zao tine Proposed Devekmmg jl s<ar aory " 2` ; DistrU No,1 t� 'tea w t ' Proposed Tax Increment i Financing District No.1-2 IN CreaW on 3-"7 • Ii i[ Y S p1 • •F . xsr � r w g aT i a SPRINGSTED Page 17 Exhibit Boundaries of Tax Increment Financing(Redevelopment)District No.1-2 Parcel ID Number Legal Description 20.031.21.23.0025 HUGO Lot-001 Block-004 LOTS 1 TO 12 INC 004 20.031.21.23.0017 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 LOT-017 .46A LOT 17 COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.24.0064 HUGO Lot-004 Block-009 S60 FT OF W30 FT LOT 4 009 HUGO ADD 20.031.21.24.0062 HUGO Lot-002 Block-009 WLY 10 FT OF LOT 2 009 &ALL OF LOT 3 BLK 9 HUGO ADD 20.031.21.24.0066 HUGO LOT-004 BLOCK-010 HUGO ADD 20.031.21.34.0077 TRAEGER'S ADD PLAT 2 LOT-008 BLOCK-001 TRAEGERS ADD PLAT 2 20.031.21.24.0063 HUGO Lot-004 Block-009 LOTS 4 &5 009 EXC SOUTH 60 FT OF W 30 FT OF LOT 4 HUGO ADD 20.031.21.24.0065 HUGO Lot-001 Block-010 LOTS 1-3 010 20.031.21.24.0012 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-002.17A PT OF LOT 2 BEG AT A PT IN SD LOT 2 30 FT SOUTH & 150 FT NORTH 89DEG.33'EAST OF NW CORNER OF SD LOT 2 THENCE CONTINUING NORTH.89DEG. 33'EAST & PAR TO NORTH LINE OF SD LOT 2 FOR 50 FT THENCE SOUTH& PAR TO WEST LINE OF'LOT 2 FOR 150 FT THENCE SOUTH 89DEG.33'WEST & PAR TO NORTH LINE OF LOT 2 FOR 50 FT THEN NORTH & PAR TO WEST LINE OF LOT 2 FOR 150 FT TO PT OF BEG. COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.34.0078 VAIL ADD LOT-001 BLOCK-001 20.031.21.24.0011 COUNTY AUDITORS PLAT#7 Lot-002 PART OF LOT 2 DESC AS FOLL BEG AT NW COR OF SD LOT 2 THN S 30FT THN N89DEG33'E 20OFT TO PT OF BEG OF LAND TO BE DESC (HEREIN!REFERRED-JO-AS PT A THN CONT N89DEG33'E&PAR TO N LINE OFSD LOT 2 FOR DIST,OF 100FT:THN S&PAR TO W LINE TO LOT 2 FOR DIST OF 15OFT THN S 89DEG33'W & PAR TO N LINE OF LOT 2 FOR DIST OF 100FT THN N'&PAR TO*LINE OF LOT 2 FOR DIST OF 15OFT TO PT A&THERE TERM ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF ON FILE & OF REC IN OFC OF REG OF DEEDS WITHIN&FOR SD CO AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 20.031.21.34.0079 VAIL ADD LOT-002 BLOCK-001 20.031.21.34.0020 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-038 ALL THAT PART OF LOT NUMBER 38 COUN- TY AUDITOR'S PLAT NUMBER 7-WASHINGTO COUNTY MINNESOTA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE EASTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF THE PRESENT U.S. HIGHWAY NUMBER 61 AND:"`THE NORTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT NUMBER 5-SECTION 20 TOWNSHIP 31NORTH RANGE 21 WEST WASHINGTON COUNTY MINN ESOTA THENCE SOUTH 11 DEGREES 57 MIN UTES WEST ALONG SAID PRESENT RIGHT OF WAYLINE OF HIGHWAY 61 FOR 1515.2 FEET THENCE EAST AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 FOR 275.4 FEET WHICH IS THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION THENCE NORTH AT RIGHT ANGLES 89.6 FEET THEN EAST AT RIGHT ANGLES 105 FEET THENCE SOUTH AT RIGHT ANGLES 107.2 FEET THENCE NORTH 69 DEGREES 14 MINUTES WEST FOR 49.73 FEET THENCE AND WEST AND PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 20 FOR 58.46 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT NUMBER 7 HUGO CITY 20.031.21.21.0029 GRANGER'S ADD LOT-005 GRANGERS ADD 20.031.21.24.0018 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-002 PART OF LOT 2 BEG AT A PT IN SD LOT 2 30 FT SOUTH & 300 FT NORTH 89DEG.33'EAST OF THE NW CORNER THERE OF THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 89DEG.33' EAST & PAR TO THE NORTH LINE OF SD LOT 2 FOR 68.5 FT TO THE WLY EDGE OF THE N P RR RNV THENCE SLY ALONG THE WLY EDGE OF SD R/W 153.4 FT THENCE S89DEG.33WEST FOR 37.5 FT THENCE NORTH 150 FT TO PT OF BEG.COUNTY AUD. PLAT 7 SPRINGSTED Page 18 Exhibit 11 20.031.21.24.0070 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-005 THAT PT LOT 5 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 DESC:BEG AT THE NW CORN OF SD LOT RUN THN ELY ALG NLY LINE OF SD LOT 15OFT TO A PT THN SLY ON LINE PAR WITH THE WLY LINE OF SD LOT 10OFT TO A PT THN WLY ON A LINE PAR WITH THE NLY LINE OF SD LOT 15OFT M/L TO THE WLY LINE OF SD LOT THN NLY ALG THE WLY LINE OF SD LOT 10OFT M/L TO PLACE OF BEG ALSO:BEG AT A PT IN WLY LINE SD LOT 5 10OFT SLY FROM THE NW CORN THEREOF THN RUN E & PAR WITH THE NLY LINE OF SD LOT 15OFT TO A PT THN SLY&PAR WITH THE WLY LINE OF SD LOT 50 FT TO A PT THN W&PAR WITH THE N LINE OF SD LOT 15OFT M/L TO THE WLY LINE OF SD LOT THN NLY ALG THE WLY LINE OF SD LOT-50FT M/L TO THE PLACE OF BEG COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 HUGO CITY 20.031.21.24.0025 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 LOT-006.48A LOT 6000NTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.24.0027 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-007 PT OF LOT'7 BEING W 178 FT AS MEAS ALONG N &S LINE OF N 209 FT EXC THE E 89 FT THEREOF CO AUDITORS PLAT #7 20.031.21.21.0073 Sect-20 Twp-031 Range-021 PT NE114-NW1/4 203121 DESC AS FOLL COM NE COR SD NE1/4-NW1/4 THN AZ N 179DEG43'38'WACO C SYS NORTH ZONE 1322.12FT TO SE COR SD NE1/4-NW1/4 THN AZ 269DEG05'26" ALG S LN SD NE1/4-NW1/4 391.2FT THN AZ 359DEG431W,PARL WITH W LN SD NE1/4-NW1/4'33FT TO N LN 147TH ST FOR POB OF LAND TO BE DESC THN CONT AZ 359DEG43'38"ALG SD PARL LN 133.5FT TO ELY EXT OF MOST SLY LN OF LAND DESC WD REC'D DEC 17 1970 BK 310 PG 525 THN AZ 269DEG05'26" ALG SD EXT LN 137.83FT TO LN PARL WITH ELY LN.HWY 61 &208FT ELY OF SD ELY LN AS MEAS ALG SD N LN OF 147TH ST N THN AZ 191DEG02'10" ALG SD PARL LN 136.45FT TO N LN SD 147TH ST N THN AZ 89DEG05"26"ALG SD N LN 164.59FT TO POB 20.031.21.21.0017 Sect-20 Twp-031 Range-021 PT NEI/4-NW114 S20T3lR21 DESC AS FOLL:COM AT NE CORN OF SD1/4 THN ON AZIMUTH FROM N OF 179DEG43'38 "ORIENTED TO WASH CO COORDINATE SYS NORTH ZONE A DIST 1322.12FT TO SE CORN OF SD1/4-1/4 THN ON AZIMUTH OF 269DEG05'26"ALG THE SO LINE OF SD 1/4-1/4 A DIST 770.38FT TO THE ELY;LINE OF US HWY #61 THN ON AZIMUTH OF 11 DEGOZIO"ALG SD ELY LINEA DIST OF 33.73FT TON LINE OF 147TH ST N THN CONTINU ON AN AZIMUTH OF 11DEG02'10"ALG SD ELY LINE A DIST 208FT TO A PT HEREINAFTER REFERRED TO AS"PT A" THN CONTINU ON AN AZIMUTH OF 11DEG 02`10" ALG SD ELY LINE A DIST OF 83 FT THN ON AN AZIMUTH OF 101DEG02'10"A DIST 13OFT TO PT OF BEG OF LAND TO BE DESC THN CONTINU ON AN AZIMUTH OF 101DEG02'10" A DIST OF 65.51FT THN ON AZIMUTH 179DEG43'38"A DIST 40.74 FT TO PT ON AZIMUTH OF 89DEG05'26" &A DIST OF 208FT FROM SD "POINT A"THN ON AZIMUTH OF 89DEG05'26" DIST OF 123.80FT TO A LINE WHICH IS PAR WITH THE E LINE OF SD1/4 1/4 OF SEC20 & DIST 391.17FT (391FT 2 INCHES) W OF SD LINE AS MEASUR ALG THE SO LINE OF SDI/4-1/4 THN ON AZIMUTH OF 359DEG43 '38"ALG SD PAR LINE DIST 191.49FT TO SO LINE OF 148TH ST N AS DESC IN A QUIT CLAIM DEED RECORDED 6-26- 1974 AS DOC#324300 THN ON AN AZIMUTH OF 269DEG0526"ALG SD SO LINE A DIST 160.54FT TO THE INTERSECT WITH LINE ON AN AZIMUTH OF 11DEG02'10" FROM PT OF BEG THN ON AZIMUTH OF 191DEG02'10 " A DIST 140.22FT TO PT OF BEG SUBJ TO EASE 20.031.21.24.0056 KENNETH N GRANGER ADD Lot-003 SUBJ TO 20FT WIDE DRAINAGE EASE 20.031.21.24.0026 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-007 W 178FT OF N 209FT OF LOT 7 CO AUDITORS PLAT#7 EXC W 89FT THEREOF 20.031.21.24.0057 KENNETH N GRANGER ADD LOT-004 KENNETH N.GRANGER ADD 20.031.21.24.0028 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-007 .50A PT OF LOT 7 BEG AT A PT IN N LINE OF LOT 7 208 FT 5 IN W FROM NE COR THENCE S PAR WITH E LINE OF LOT 7 SPRINGSTED Page 19 Exhibit 11 209 FT THENCE W 104 FT 2.5 IN THENCE N 209 FT THENCE E 104 FT 2.5 IN TO BEG.COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.24.0058 KENNETH N GRANGER ADD LOT-005 20.031.21.24.0030 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-007 THAT CERTAIN PT OF LOT 7 IN COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 IN VILLAGE OF HUGO & BEING PT OF GOV LOT 4 IN S20T31R21 WASH CO MN DESC:BEG @ NE CORN SD LOT 7 THN W ALG THE N LN THEREOF FOR 79.21FT THN S PAR TO E LN SD LOT 7 FOR 209FT THN E PAR TO DESC IST COURSE FOR 79.21FT TO E LN LOT 7 THN N ALG SD E LN FOR 209FT TO POB -TRACT AS DES IS SUBJ TO 1/2 THE WIDTH OF ONEKA RD ALG THE N LN OR 33FT 20.031.21.24.0059 KENNETH N GRANGER ADD LOT-006 29.031.21.23.0001 Sect-29 Twp-031 Range-021 PT OF SW1/4 OF NW1/4 293121 NORTH 2 RODS LYING EAST OF ROAD EXC TO HWY 29.031.21.22.0004 Sect-29 Twp-031 Range-021 S 10A OF S 20A OF THAT PT N12-NW1/4 S29 T31 R21 LYING E OF RR RNV& HWY 61 EXC: THAT PT SD S 20A DESC AS FOLL: COM AT INTER ELY LN SD HWY 61 &LN 218FT S OF N LN SD S 20A;THN ELY&PARL W/N LN SD S 20A 377.78FT;THN S AT RT ANG 30FT TO POB;THIN CONT S 21 OFT;THN ELY AT RT ANG 210FT; THN NLY AT RT ANG 210FT; THN WLY ASF RT ANG 21OFT TO POB;TOG W/30FT RD EASE.EXC:THAT PT SD S 20A DESC AS TOLL: BEG AT INTER ELY RNV LN NEW HWY 61 &LN 248FT S OF N LN SD S 20A 384.08FT;THN S AT RT ANG 140FT; THN WLY TO PT ON SD ELY RNV LN BEING 108. 81FT SWLY OF POB; THN NLY ALG SD RNV LN 108.8,1 FT TO POB. EXC THAT PT SD S 20A DESC AS FOLL:COM AT INTER NEW ELY R/W LN SD HWY 61 &LN 218FT S OF N LN SD S 20A MEAS AT RT ANG THERETO;THN ELY & PARL W/N LN SD S 20 A 587.78FT TO POB LAND TO BE DESC THN S AT RT ANG 240FT; THN W AT RT ANG 21OFT;THN S AT RT ANG.&TO S LNSD.N112-NW 1/4;THN E ON SD S LN TO SE COR'W N1/2-NW1/4;"THIN N ON E LN SD N12-NW1/4 TO LN DRAWN ELY FROM POB&PARL W/N LN SD S 20A;THN WLY TO POB 29.031.21.21.0009 Sect-29 Twp-031 Range-021PT'OF N12 OF NW1/4 293121 BEING THAT PART OF THE NORTH 10 ACRES OF SOUTH 20 AC RES LYING ELY OF S.T.H. 61 &DES AS FOL.COM AT INTER OF ELY LINE OF HWY 61 &A LINE 218 FT S OF N LINE OF SD S'20 ACRES THEN E & PAR WITH N LINE OF SD S 20 ACRES 377.78 FT THEN S AT RT ANG 30 FT TO PT OF BEG THEN CON S 210 FT THEN ELY AT RT ANG 210 FT'.THEN NLY AT RT ANG 210 FT THEN WLY AT RT ANG 210 FT TO PT OF BEG. SUBJ TO EASE 29.03121.21.0008 Se4-29 Twp-031 Range-021 PT OF N12-NW1A 293121 COM AT INTERS OF S LINE OF N12-NW1/4 OF SD SEC 29 WITH E RNV LINE OF TRUNK HWY #61 AS NOW WIDENED TO 111FT THN N11DEG51'E ALONG SD E RNV LINE DIST OF 501AFT THN E&PAR WITH S LINE OF SD N12 NW1/4 DIST OF 40OFT TO ACTUAL PT OF BEd OF TRACT HEREIN DESC &CONVEYED THN CONT E ALONG SD PAR LINE DIST, OF 22OFT THN S AT RT ANG DIST OF 218FT THN W&PAR WITH S LINE OF SD N12 NW1/4 DIST OF 220FT THN N AT RT ANG DIST OF 218FT TO ACTUAL PT OF BEG SUBJ TO RD EASE 29.031.21.22.0008 Sect-29 Twp-031 Range-021 PT OF NW1/4-NW1/4 S29 T31 R21 DESC AS FOLL: COM AT INTER OF S LN SD TRACT&E RNV LN HWY 61-NOW WID TO 111 FT-THN NLY ALG SD HWY RNV LN 399.23FT TO POB THN CONT NLY ALG SD RNV LN 102.17FT THN E PARL TO S LN SD NW1/4-NW1/4 136.56FT THN ELY ON STRT LN &ITS EXT TO PT 173.35FT E MEAS ALG SD PARL LN FROM E RNV LN SD HWY 61 &5.45 FT S FROM PARL LN 21.68FT THN S ON LN DRAWN AT RT ANG TO S LN SD NW1/4 96.74FT THN W PARL TO S LN SD NW1/4178.93FT TO POB 29.031.21.22.0001 Sect-29 Twp-031 Range-021 PT OF N12-NW1/4 293121 BEG AT INTER S LN SD TRACT&E LN NEW HWY 61; THN N11DEG51'E ALG SD HWY LN 501AFT TO POB; SPRINGSTED Page 20 Exhibit 11 THN ELY & PARL W/S LN SD N1/2 40OFT; THN NLY AT RT ANG TO LAST CRSE 357.26FT;THN WLY&PARL W/S LN SD N1/2 325.23FT TO INTER W/E LN SD HWY 61;THN S11DEG 51'W ALG SD HWY 61 365FT TO POB SUBJ TO EASE 11DEG51'W ALONG SD HWY A DIST OF 365FT TO ACTUAL PT OF BEG ALSO SUBJ TO UTILITY EASE OF RECORD -SUBJ TO DRIVEWAY EASE- MT & MAINTENANCE AGREEMT 29.031.21.22.0007 Sect-29 Twp-031 Range-021 N1/2-NW1/4 S29T31R21 DESC AS FOLL: COM AT INTER OF N LN SD SEC 29 W/ ELY LN HWY 61-NOW WID TO 111FT- SD PT OF INTER BEING 1103.76FT E FROM NW COR SD SEC 29 THN E ALG N LN SD SEC 29 285FT THN S AT RT ANG TO SD N LN 278.89FT THN W & PARL W/ SD N LN 343.71FT TO INTER W/ ELY LN HWY 61 THN NIIDEG53'19"E ALG SD ELY LN 285FT TO POB SUBJ TO RD EASE EXC THE FOLL DESC TRACT: COM AT INTER OF N LN SD SEC29 W/ELY LN OF HWY 61 -NOW WID TO 111 FT-SD PT OF INTER BEING 1103.76FT E OF NW COR SD SEC 29 THN S11DEG53'19"W ALG SD ELY LN 33.72FT TO APOB OF TRAC TO BE DESC THN CONT S11DEG53' 19"W ALG SD ELY LN 10OFT THN N50DEG56'40"E 155.31FT TO ITS INTER W/ LN DRAWN PARL W/&33FT S OF SD N LN THN W ALG SD PARL LN 10OFT TO APOB ALSO SUBJ TO EASE A DIST OF 100FT THN' N50DEG56'40"E A DIST OF 155.31FT TO ITS INTERSECT WITH A LINE DRAWN PAR WITH & 33FT S OF THE N°`LINE OF SD SEC29 THN DUE W ALG SD PAR LINE A DIST OF 10OFT TO THE ACTUAL PT OF BEG-ALSO SUBJ TO SANITARY SWR'EASEMN HUGO 20.031.21.33.0010 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-037_1A.LOT 37 EXC TO HWY COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.33.0009 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7;LOT-036 EXC TO,HWY 20.031.21.33.0004 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-035 PART OF LOT 35 CTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 DESC AS FOLL COM AT SW COR OF SW114 OF S2OT31 R21 THN E ALONG S LINE OF SD SEC 20DISTOF 512.2FT THN N AT RT ANG DIST OF 11 OFT TO PT OF BEG OF PROPERTY HEREIN TO BE DESC THN E AT RT ANG DIST OF 75FT THN N AT RT ANG DIST OF 9OFT THN'E AT RT ANG DIST OF 284AFT THN S AT RT ANG DIST OF 37FT THN SWLY PAR TO RR RNV DIST OF 166.59FT THN E ALONG S LINE OF SD.SEC 20'DIST OF 51.10FT THN NELY ALONG SD RR RNV DIST OF 372.59FTTHN W PAR TO S LINE OF SEC 20 DIST OF 452.94FT THN S AT RT ANG DIST OF 254.49FT TO PT OF BEG ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF ON FILE&OF REC IN OFC OF CTY REC 20.031.21.34.0028 Sect-20 Twp-031 Range-021 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-038 THAT PT OF LOT 38 AUDITOR'S PLAT#7&BEING A PT OF GOV LOT 6&OF THE SW/14-SW1/4 S20T3lR21W DESC AS FOLL: BEG AT JUDICIAL LANDMARK ON E LINE OF US HWY#61 AS NOW ESTABLISHED & THE W LINE OF SD AUDITOR'S LOT 38 SD JUDICIAL LANDMARK BEING 909.48FT NLY FROM THE SO LINE OF SEC 20 AS MEASUR ALG SD W LINE OF AUDITOR'S LOT 38 & E LINE OF STATE HWY #61 FROM THE SO LINE OF SD SEC 20& 136FT ELY OF C/L OF BN INC RNV MEASUR AT RT ANG THERETO THN E PAR WITH SO LINE OF SD SEC 20 FOR SOFT TO JUDICIAL LANDMARK THN SO AT RT ANG FOR 147.48FT TO JUDICIAL LANDMAR ON N LINE OF HUGO PLACE AS NOW ESTAB 66FT WIDE THN WLY ALG SD STREET LINE DIST 111.03FT TO JUDICIAL LANDMARK AT INTERSECT THEREOF WITH SD E LINE OF US HWY#61 THN NLY ALG SD HWY LINE FOR 150.71FT TO PT OF BEG AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 20.031.21.34.0026 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-038 PART OF LOT 38 OF CO AUDITORS PLAT#7 WASH CO MN DESC AS FOLL BEG AT PT ON E LINE OF WHITE BR&HUGO RD 13 CHAINS & 78 LINKS NLY FROM S LINE OF SD SEC MEAS ON E LINE OF SD RD THN NELY ALONG SD E LINE OF SD RD 1.58 CHAINS THN ELY PAR WITH S LINE OF SD SEC 6.35 CHAINS THN S PAR WITH AFORESAID E LINE 1.58 CHAINS THN SPRINGSTED Page 21 Exhibit 11 W 6.35 CHAINS TO PLACE OF BEG 20.031.21.34.0024 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-038 PART OF LOT 38 BEG AT A PT ON E LINE OF RNV OF TRUNK HWY 61 WHICH IS 1013.76 FT NLY MEASURED ALONG E LINE OF TRUNK HWY 61 FROM S LINE OF SEC 20 THEN E PAR WITH S LINE SD SEC 20 A DIS OF 170 FT TO A PT THEN NLY PAR WITH ELY RNV LINE OF HWY 6164 FT TO A PT THEN W PAR WITH S LINE OF SEC 20 170 FT M/L TO E RNV LINE OF HWY 61 THEN SLY ON E RNV LINE OF HWY 61 A DIS 64 FT M/L TO PT OF BEG. COUNTY AUD. PLAT 7 20.031.21.34.0025 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-038 PART OF LOT 38 BEG AT A PT ON E R/W LINE OF HWY 61 WHICH IS 1077.76 FT NLY MEASURED ALONG E LINE OF HWY 61 FROM S LINE OF SEC 20 THEN E PAR WITH S LINE OF SD SEC 20 A DIS OF 170 FT TO A PT THEN NLY PAR WITH ELY RNV LINE OF HWY 61 60 FT TO A PT THEN W PAR WITH S LINE OF SD SEC 20170 FT M/L TO E R/W LINE OF SD HWY 61 THEN SLY ON E RNV LINE SD HWY A DIS OF 60 FT M/L TO PT OF BEG COUNTY AUDITOR PLAT 7 20.031.21.34.0023 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-038 PT OF LOT 38 BEG AT A PT IN E LINE OF H WY THAT IS 337.6 FT SLY FROM 5W COR OF LOT 33 CO AUD`PLAT 7 THEN SLY ALONG E LIN E OF SD HWY FOR 91.6 FT TO APT THEN E PARA WITH S LINE OF SEC 20 FOR A DIS OF 275.4 FT TO A PT THEN'N90DEG. 89.6 FT TO A PT THEN W90DEG.& PAR TO S LINE OF SEC 20 FOR A DIS OF 256.4 FT TO PT OF BEG. COUNTY AUD. PLAT NO.7 20.031.21.31.0024 Sect-20 Twp-031 Range-021 PT S12 203121 DESC AS COM @ W1/4 COR OF SD S20 THN N89DEG 07'38"EASMBRG ALG E-W1/4 LN SD S20 DIST 1591.18FT TO INTER OF ELY R/W`LN.OF US HWY#61 (AK A:STATE RD 5)S ELY R/W LN BEING DIST 33FT ELY OF THE C/L OF SID HWY THN S11DEG02'09"W ALG SD RNV LN DIST 1423.6FT TO ACTUAL POB:OF TRCT TO BE DESC THN N11DEG02'09"E BACK ALG SD ELY RNV LN DIST 51.1OFT THN N89DEG08'21"E 249.53FT THN N00 DEG52'22"W 280.39FT TO THE S LN OF LT 33-AUD PLAT#? ACCORDI TO REC PLAT THERE OF THN N89-DEG07'38"E ALG SLY LN OF SD LT 33 & ITS ELY EXT THEREOF TO SHRLN OF EGG LK THN SLY ALG SD SHRLN TO PT OF INTER WITH LN"DRWY ELY'FROM THE ACTUAL POB SD LN BEING PARNV S LN OF GV LT 6 SD S20 THN MDEG08'21"W ALG SD PAR LN TO ACTUAL POB EXC PRCL 10 WACO RNV PLAT 147 LYING WITHIN S20T31R21 SUBJ TO EASE 20.031.21.31.0002 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-027 PART OF LOTS 27 & 28 BEG AT AN IRON PIPE MONUMENT SET AT THE INTERSEC-TION OF THE NLY LINE OF GOV LOT 5 SEC 20 T31 R21 WITH THE ELY LINE OF HWY NO. 61 & RUNNING THENCE SLY ALONG SAID ELY OF SAID HWY 55.70 FT THENCE SELY ON A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF LOT 27 SAID POINT BEING 53 FT EAST OF THE SW COR OF SAID LOT 27 THENCE ELY ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE OF LOT 27 TO THE SE COR OF LOT 27 THENCE SOUTH ALONG WLY LINE OF SAID LOT 28 TO A POINT WHICH IS 50 FT NORTH OF THE SW COR OF LOT 28 THENCE ELY ON A STRAIGHT LINE WHICH IS PARA- LLEL TO &50 FT NORTH OF SLY LINE OF LOT 28 TO WLY SHORELINE OF EGG LAKE THENCE NLY ALONG THE WLY SHORELINE OF EGG LAKE TO ITS IN-TERSECTION WITH THE NLY LINE OF SAID LOT 28 THENCE WLY ALONG THE NLY LINE OF LOT 28&THE NLY LINE OF LOT 5 SEC 20 T31 R21 TO BEG.COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.31.0007 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-030 PART OF LOT 30 BEG AT THE SE COR OF LOT 27 THENCE SOUTH A DISTANCE OF 74 FT TO A POINT THENCE NWLY ON A LINE DRAWN FROM LAST DESCRIBED POINT TO A POINT IN THE EAST LINE OF PUBLIC HWY NO. 61 AT A POINT 100.27 FT SWLY FROM THE NW COR OF SAID LOT 27 MEASURING ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PUBLIC HWY A DIS-TANCE OF 71 FT TO A POINT THENCE NORTH TO A POINT 14 FT SOUTH OF THE SOUTH SPRINGSTED Page 22 Exhibit H LINE OF SAID LOT 27 AFORE-SAID THENCE WEST ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27 TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID PUBLIC HWY THENCE NLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PUBLIC HWY 14 FT MORE OR LESS TO THE SW COR OF SAID LOT 27 THENCE EAST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27 TO THE PLACE OF BEG.COUNTY AUD. PLAT 20.031.21.24.0052 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-016 PT LOT 16 BEG AT SW CORN SD LOT 16 THEN RUN NLY PAR WITH HWY 61 30 FT THEN E 62 FT PAR TO S LINE LOT 16 THEN S 30 FT PAR TO HWY 61 THEN W 62 ALONG S LINE LOT 16 TO PT OF BEG. EXC-COM AT PT ON W LINE LOT 16 WHCH 30 FT N OF SW COR THEREOF & ALSO E LINE HWY 61 THEN R IN ELY DIRECTION PAR WITH S LINE LOT 16 62 FT TO PT THEN R IN SLY DIRECT&PAR WITH W LINE LOT 16 DIST 3 FT TO PT THEN RUN NWLY ALONG A LINE TO PT ON W LINE WHICH IS 30 FT N OF SW COR& ALSO PT OF BEG.COUNTY AUD. PLAT NO,7 20.031.21.24.0051 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-016 EXC THAT PT CONVEYED TO CLARA ETHIER DESC AS FOLLOWS COM AT PT ON W LINE OF SD LOT 16 WHICH IS ALSO E LINE OF TRUNK HWY 61 DIST OF 30FT N OF SW COR THEREOF MEAS ALONG SD E LINE THN RUNNING,IN SLY DIRECTION ALONGW LINE OF SD LOT 16&PAR WITH E LINE OF TRUNK HWY 61 FOR 30FT TO SD SW.COR OF SD LOT 16 THN RUNNING ELY ALONG S LINE OF SD LOT 16 DIST OF 62FT TO PT THN RUNNING NLY ALONG LINE PAR TO SD W:LINE OF SD LOT 16 WHICH IS ALSO PAR WITH E LINE OF TRUNK HWY 61 DIST OF 27FT TO PT THN RUNNING IN NWLY DIRECTION 'IN STRAIGHT LINE TO PT OF BEG ACCORDING TO PLAT THEREOF ON FILE&OF REC IN OFFICE OF REG OF DEEDS WITHIN & FOR SD CO & EXC THAT PT THEREOF;DESC AS FOLLOWS PT OF LOT 16 OF CO AUDITORS PLAT #7 DESC AS FOLLOWS BEG AT NWLY COR OF LOT 16 OF CO AUDITORS,PLAT #7 IN'AALLAGE OF HUGO.MN THN SELY ON LINE DRAWN AT RIGHT ANG TO WLY LINE OF SD LOT 16 FOR DIST OF 279FT M/L TO WILY SHORE LINE OF EGG LK THN NLY ALONG SD WLY SHORELINE OF EGG LK FOR DIST OF 56FT M/L TO ITS INTERS WITH N LINE OF SD LOT 16 THN W ALONG SD N LINE OF LOT 16-FOR 270FT M/L TO PT OF BEG TOGETHER WITH EASE OVER & ACROSS '15FT WIDE TRACT EXT FROM WLY LINE OF LOT 16 TO SD WLY SHORELINE OF EGG LK NLY LINE OF SD 15FT WIDE EASE BEING SLY LINE OF ABOVE DESC TRACT OF LAND PURPOSE OF SD EASE SHALL BE FOR FOLLOWING STATED PURPOSE TO BE USED AS JOINT DRIVEWAY FOR INGRESS &,EGRESS BETWEEN PROPERTY OF PARTY OF SECOND PT HIS HEIRS OR ASSIGNS &ADJ PROPERTY OWNERS AS SET FORTH IN THAT DEED BETWEEN DONALD F CARPENTER & JOY M CARPENTER HUSBAND & WIFE TO VILLAGE OF HUGO MUNICIPAL CORPORATION CO AUDITORS PLAT#7 SUBJ TO NW BELL TELEPHONE CO EASEMEN 20.031.21.24.0050 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-015 PT LOTS 15 & 16 BEG AT NWLY CORN LOT 15 THEN SWLY ALONG WLY LINE SD LOT 15 FOR 46 FT TO SWLY CORN THERE OF THEN SELY AT RT ANG DIST 175 FT THEN NLY ALONG LINE PAR TO WLY LINE DIST 46 FT THEN WLY 175 FT PAR TO SLY LINE THEREOF TO PT OF BEG. SUBJ WEASEMENT.CO.AUDITORS PLAT 7 20.031.21.24.0047 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-013.63A S 80 FT LOT 13 COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.24.0045 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 LOT-012.32A LOT 12 COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.24.0008 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-002 ,17A PART OF LOT 2 BEG AT A PT ON THE WEST LINE OF SD LOT 2 - 30 FT SOUTH OF THE NW CORNER THEREOF THENCE NORTH 89DEG.33'E PAR WITH NORTH LINE OF LOT 2 FOR 150 FT THENCE SOUTH 50 FT THENCE SOUTH 89DEG.33WEST FOR 150 FT TO THE WEST LINE OF LOT 2 THENCE NORTH ALONG SD WEST LINE FOR 50 FT TO BEG. EXC E 10 FT.COUNTY AUD. PLAT 7 SPRINGSTED Page 23 Exhibit 11 20.031.21.24.0009 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-002 PT LOT 2 BEG AT A PT ON W LINE SD LOT 2 30 FT S OF NW COR THEREO THEN N89DEG.33'E PAR WITH N LINE OF LOT 2 FOR 150 FT TO PT OF BEG OF PROPERTY HEREIN TO BE CONVEY ED THEN S 100 FT THEN S89DEG.33'W FOR 10 FT THEN N PAR TO 1ST COURSE FOR 100 FT THEN E89DEG.33'E FOR 10 F TO PT OF BEG. COUNTY AUD. PLAT 20.031.21.24.0015 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-002 PT LOT 2 COM AT NW CORN LOT 2 THEN S ALONG W LINE LOT 2 FOR 180 FT THEN N89DEG.33'E FOR 150 FT TO PT OF BEG THIS DESC.THEN CONT N89DEG.33'E FOR 187.5 FT M/L TO WLY RNV LINE N P RR CO THEN SLY ALONG SD WLY RNV LINE 61.4 FT THEN 89DEG.33'W 177.6FT THEN N & PAR WITH SD WLY LINE LOT 2 FOR 60 FT'TO PT BEG. COUNTY AUD. PLAT 7 20.031.21.24.0017 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-002 PT. LOT2 CO AT NW CORN LOT 2 THEN S ALONG W LINE SD LOT 2 FOR 240 FT TO PT BEG;THIS DESC. THEN N89DEG 33E 327.6 FT M/L TO WLY RNV LINEN P RR CO THEN 81LY ALONG SD WLY R/W 76.7 FT THEN S89DEG.33'W 312.6 FT M/L TO WLY LINE LOT 2 THEN N ALONG SD W LINE LOT 2 FOR 75 FT TO PT BEG.COUNTY AUD.PLAT 20.031.21.24.0022 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-003 PT OF LOTS 3&4 COM AT NW COR OF LOT 3 CO. AUD. PLAT 7 THENCE RUN IN A SLY DIRECTION ALONG WLY LINE OF SD LOT 3 A DIST OF 157 FT TO A PT'THENCE'RUN IN AN ELY DIRECTION & PAR WITH NLY LINE OF LOTS 3&4 OF CO.AUD. PLAT 7 A DIST OF 120 FT TO PT OF BEG OF LAND TO,BIE.DESCRIBED THENCE RUN IN A NLY DIRECTION & PAR WITH WLY LINE OF SQ LOTS A DIST OF 30 FT TO A PT THENCE RUN IN AN ELY DIRECTION & PAR WITHALY LINE OF SD LQTS,3&4 TO A PT ON ELY LINE OF SD LOT 4 THENCE R IN A SLY DIRECTION ALONG ELY LINE OF SD LOT 4 TO A PT WHICH.IS SE COR OF SD LOT 4`& N COR OF LOT 1 BLK 10 HUGO THENCE RUIN IN WLY DIREC-TIO#4t"&PAR WITH NLY LINE OF SD LO TS 3 &4 TO PT OF BEG.COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.24.0023 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7'Lot-005 THAT PART OF THE NORTH 150 FEET OF LOT 5 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT NUMBER 7 LYING EAST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBE LINE:COMMENCING AT THE NORTHWEST COR NER OF SAID LOT 5 THENCE EAST ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT 5 A DIST- ANCE OF 150 FEET TO THE POINT OF BE-GINNING OF THE LINE TO BE DESCRIBED THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID:LOT 5 TO ITS INTERSECTION WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 150 FEET: TO SAID LOT 5 AND THERE TERMINATING ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THER-EOF ON FILE AND ON RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTER OF DEEDS IN AND FOR SAID COUNTY COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT NUMBER 7 HUGO CITY 20.031.21.24.0038 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-008 PART OF LOT 8 OF CO AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 BEGAT PT ON WLY LINE OF SD LOT 8 (ALSO ELY LINE OF FOREST BLVD N) DIST 50FT NELY OF SW COR OF SD LOT 8 THN NELY ALONG SD ELY RD LINE 83.9FT M/L TO PT DIST 287.54FT SWLY OF NW COR OF LOT 7 OF SD CO AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 THN SELY DEFL 89DEG33'35"TO RT 117.6FT M/L TO INTERS WITH LINE DRAWN NELY PAR WITH WLY LINE OF SD LOT 8 FROM PT ON SLY LINE OF SD LOT 8 DIST 120FT E OF SW COR THEREOF THN SWLY ALONG SD PAR LINE 60.8FT M/L TO ITS INTERS WITH LINE DRAWN ELY PAR WITH S LINE OF SD LOT 8 FROM PT OF BEG THN WLY ALONG SD PAR LINE 120FT TO PT OF BEG 20.031.21.24.0041 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-010 PT LOT 10-COUNTY AUDITORS PLAT NO.7 &THAT PT GOV LOT 4 S20T31R21 BEING THE N1/2 OF LOT#10&PT OF THE S1/2 OF LOT#10 OF CO AUD PLAT#7 DESC AS FOLL:COM AT NW CORN OF SD S1/2 SPRINGSTED Page 24 Exhibit OF LOT#10 THN E ALG THE N LINE THEREOF FOR 58FT THN SO AT RT ANGLE TO THE N LINE THEREOF FOR 7FT THNC NWLY TO PT OF BEG&ALSO DESC AS FOL THAT PT OF GOV LOT 4 S20T31R21W CITY OF HUGO & THAT PT OF CO AUDITOR PLAT#7 ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THERE-OF ON FILE&OF RECORD IN THE OFFICE OF COUNTY RECORDER WASH CO MN DESC AS FOLL:COM AT NE CORN OF SD GOV LOT 4 THN S89DEG05'26"W BEAR ARE BASED ON WASH CO PROJECT COORDINATE SYSTEM NORTH ZONE ALG THE N LINE OF SD GOV LOT 4 A DIST 770.34FT THN S11 DEG01'52"W A DIST 736.79FT TO A 1/2 INCH PIPE MONUMENT MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBES ANEZ RLS 13775 & WHICH IS ALSO THE PT OF BEG OF LAND TO BE DESC THN CONTINUING S11DEG01' 52"W DIST OF 48FT TO A 12 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED RLS 13590 THN S81DEG48 '34"E A DIST OF 50FT TO A 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED RLS 13590 THN N81DEG07'37"E A DIST 51.83FT TO A 12 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED RLS 13590 THN N89DEG30'25"E TO THE WLY SHORELINE OF EGG LAKE THN NLY ALG SD WLY SHORELINE TO THE INTERSECT WITH A LINE THAT BEARS N89DEG30'25"E FROM THE PT OF BEG THN.S89DEG30'25"W TO THE PT OF BEG 20.031.21.24.0043 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-011 .30A LOT 11 LYING N OF A LINE RUN FROM A PT IN E LINE OF RD 8 FT N OF SIN-COR TO APT ON LAKE SHORE 1 FT N OF SE COR EXC 35135-4700 COUNTY AUDITORS PLAT 7 COUNTY AUD. PLAT 7 20.031.21.24.0044 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-011 PART OF LOT 11 BEG AT SW COR OF SD LOT 11 THENCE RUN ALONG SOUTH LINE OF SD LOT 11 TO SE COR THEREOF THEN RUN NORTH ALONG EAST LINE THEREOF A DIST OF 3 FT THENCE RUN IN A NWLY DIRECTION TO,A PT ON WEST LINE OF SD LOT 10 FT NORTH OF SW COR THEREOF THENCE SOUTH ALONG WEST LINE THEREOF A DIST OF 10 FT TO PLACE OF BEG.COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.24.0046 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-013.45A N 70 FT OF LOT 13 COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.24.0048 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 LOT-014 COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.24.0049 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-015 COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 EXC 35135-4950 20.031.21.24.0053 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-016 PT LOT 16 BEG AT NWLY COR LOT 16 THN SELY ON-LINE DRAWN AT RIGHT ANG TO WLY LINE SD LOT 16 FOR 279FT M/L TO WLY SHORE EGG LK THN NLY ALONG WLY SHORELINE EGG LK DIST 56FT M/L TO INTERS WITH N LINE SD LOT 16 THN W ALONG SD N LINE LOT 16 FOR 270FT M/L TO PT OF BEG EASE CO ADD PLAT 7 EXC 35135 4950 20.031.21.24.0060 HUGO LOT-001 BLOCK-009 HUGO ADD 20.031.21.24.0061 HUGO'Lot-002 Block-009 ELY 40 FT OF LOT 2 009 HUGO ADD 20.031.21.24.0069 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-008 THAT PART OF LOT 8 OF COUNTY AUDITOR PLAT NUMBER 7 WASHINGTON COUNTY-MINN ESOTA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:BEGIN NI NG AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 OF THE RECORDED PLAT OF KENNETH N GRAN- GER ADDITION AS MONUMENTED THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID KENNETH N GRANGER ADDITION TO AN ANGLE POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 3 OF SAID KENNETH N GRANGER ADDITION (SAID POINT BEING 30 FEET MORE OR LESS EASTERLY OF THE SOUTH- EAST CORNER OF OAK STREET AS DEDICA- TED IN SAID PLAT) THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3 A DISTANCE OF 113 FEET THENCE NORTHWESTERLY TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION OF THE WES- TERLY LINE OF SAID KENNETH N GRANGER ADDITION DISTANT 52.40 FEET SOUTH- WESTERLY OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 OF SAID KENNETH N GRANGER ADD- TION THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY EXTENSION A SPRINGSTED Page 25 Exhibit 11 DISTANCE OF 52.40 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST COR- NER OF LOT 2 AND THE POINT OF BEGIN- NING -SUBJECT TO EASEMENT COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT NUMBER 7 HUGO CITY 20.031.21.31.0004 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-028 PART OF LOT 28 BEG AT THE SW COR OF SAID LOT & RUNNING THENCE NORTH ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT A DISTANCE OF 50 FT TO A POINT THENCE EAST ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT TO THE SHORE OF EGG LAKE SO CALLED THENCE SLY ALONG THE SHORE OF EGG LAKE TO THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT AND THENCE WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT TO THE PLACE OF BEG& BEING THE SLY 50 FT OF SAID LOT COUNTY AUD.PLAT 7 20.031.21.31.0008 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-030 PART OF LOT 30 BEG AT A POINT IN THE WEST LINE OF SAID TRACT 14 FT SWLY FROM THE SW COR OF LOT 27 MEASURING ALONG THE EAST LINE OF PUBLIC HWY NO. 61 THENCE CONTINUING SWLY ALONG THE EAST LINE OF SAID PUBLIC HWY A DISTANCE OF 46 FT TO A POINT THENCE IN A $ELY DIRECTION ON A LINE TO A POINT THAT IS 74 FT SOUTH OF THE SECOR OF SAID LOT 27 A D (STANCE OF 94 FT MEASURED ALONG LAST DESCRIBED LINE FROM SAID PUB-LIC HWY THENCE NORTH TO A POINT 14 FT SOUTH OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27 THENCE WEST ON A LINE PAR- ALLEL WITH THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID LOT 27 TO THE PLACE OF BEG.COUNTY AUD. PLAT 7 20.031.21.31.0009 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot 030 PT OF LOT 30 BEG AT PT IN ELY LINE OF HUGO &WHITE BEAR RD SD PT BEING`120.7 FT SWLY MEAS ALONG ELY LINE OF SD RD FROM ITS INTERSECTION WITH. N LINE OF LOT 5 THENCE SWLY ALONG ELY LINE OF SD RD 20.12 FT THENCE SELY 169.16 FT TO A PT 140 FT E & 154 FT S OF INTERSECTION OF NLINE OF LOT 5 WITH ELY LINE OF HUGO & WHITE BEAR RD THENCE.N 20 FT THENCE NWLY 165 FT TO BEG. COUNTY AUD PLAT 7' 20.031.21.32.0005 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-022 E 50FT OF E1/2 OF LOT 22 COUNTY AUD. PLAT 7 20.031.21.32.0009 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 L6t-024.50A W 52.14 FT LOT 24 COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 ` 20.031.21.32.0016 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-024 PT LOT 24 COM AT A PT ON NLY LINE OF SD GOV LOT 5-231 FT W OF CENTER LINE OF N P RY THENCE IN A WLY DIR PAR TO SD RR& PAR TO & DISTANCE ELY 4 FT FROM ELY LINE OF LAND DEEDED TO'F M PEITTE BY DEED HEREINTOFORE DES TO THE INTERSECTION OF A LINE DRAWN PAR TO & DIS 136 FT SLY FROM N SIDE GOV LOT 5 THENCE W ALONG SD PAR LINE 67 FT THENCE NLY TO A PT WHICH IS DIS 33 FT S FROM SDNLINE OFSDGOV LOT 5 &20FTWONALINE PAR TOSDNLINE OFSID GOV LOT 5 FROM W LINE 0 F THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF LAND CONVEYED BY WARRANTY DEED FROM F KIICHLITO ONE F M PIETTE DATED JYLY 15 1896 & RECORDED IN OFFICE OF REG OF DEEDS ON JULY 20-1896 IN BOOK 45 PAGE 143 THENCE NLY TO SD N LINE OF SD GOV LOT 5 ALONG SD W LINE 0 F PREMISE HEREIN PRODUCED TO SD N LINE OF SD GOV LOT 5 THENCE E ALONG SD GOV LOT 5 TO PLACE OF BEG.COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.32.0017 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-024 .06A PT LOT 24 BEG AT A PT IN S LINE PUBLIC RD SD PT BEING DES AS FOLLOWS N89DEG.30'E 1240.42 FT S 11DEG.24'W 33.72 FT OF NW COR OF LOT 5 S11DEG.24'W 105.28 FT N89DEG. 30'E 26.61 FT N11DEG.24'E 105.28 FT TO S LINE OF PUBLIC RD S89DEG.30' W ALONG S LINE RD 26.61 FT TO BEG.COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.32.0019 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 LOT-025.11A LOT 25 COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.32.0021 Sect-20 Twp-031 Range-021 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-034 PT LOT 34 COM AT INTERSEC OF E & W1/4 SECTION LINE OF SEC 20 TWP 31 N RANGE 21 W SPRINGSTED Page 26 Exhibit 11 WITH WLY BOUNDARY LINE OF LAND OWNED BY N P RY CO SD BOUNDARY LINE BEING 200 FT WLY MEASURED AT RT ANG FROM THE CEN LINE OF MAIN TRACK OF SD RAILWAY CO AS SAME EXISTED AUGUST 22-1919 THEN SWLY ALONG SD BOUNDARY LINE PAR WITH CEN LINE OF SD TRACK 473.85 FT WHICH IS THE PT OF BEG OF THIS DES THEN PRODEED ALONG SAME BOUNDARY LINE IN SAME DIRECT 200 FT TO A PT THEN NWLY AT RT ANG 100 FT TO A PT THEN NELY AT RT ANG & PAR WITH SD RAILWAY CO. BOUNDARY LINE 200 FT TO A PT THEN SELY AT RT ANG TO PT OF BEG. COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.32.0022 Sect-20 Twp-031 Range-021 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-034 1.004A PT LOT 34 CO AUD. PLAT 7 COM AT INTERSEC E/W1/4 LINE SEC 20 WITH WILY BOUND.LINE OF LAND OWNED BY NP RR SD BOUND.BEING 200 FT WLY MEAS. AT RT ANG FROM CEN LINE MAIN TRACK SD RR AS SAME EXISTE 8/22/19.THEN SWLY ALONG BOUND LINE PAR WITH CENT LINESD TRACK 473.85 FT TO PT BEG. THEN NWLY AT RT ANG TO SD WLY BOUND LINE SD RR PROP ITS 100 FT THEN SWLY AT RT ANG&PAR TO WLY LINE SD RR PROP DIST 200 FT THN W& PAR TO N LINE S LOT 34 CO.PLAT 7 DIST 180 FT THEN N AT RT ANG DIST.219.45 FT M/L TO N LINE LOT 34 THEN'A LONG N LINE LOT 34 DIST,150.5 FT M/L TO ANG PT IN SD N LINE LOT 34 THEN SELY ALONG NLY LINE SD LOT 34 174.8 FT M/L TO PT BEG.COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.32.0023 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-026 THAT PART OF LOT 26 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT NUMBER 7 BEING THAT PORTION OF THE WESTERLY 175 FEET OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY'S (FORMER- LY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY)250 FEET WIDE STATION GROUND PROPER- TY AT HUGO MINNESOTA:BEING 50 FEET WIDE ON THE EASTERLY SIDE AND 200 FEET, WIDE ON THE WESTERLY SDE OF SAID RAILROAD COMPANY'S HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED MAIN TRACK CENTERLINE AS NOW LOCATED AND CONSTRUCTED UPON OVER AND ACROSS GOVERNMENT LOT 5 IN SECTION 20 TOWNSHIP 31 NORTH RANGE 21 WEST OF THE 4TH PRINCIPAL MERID- IAN WASHINGTON COUNTY MINNESOTA LY ING BETWEEN TWO LINES DRAWN PARALLEL WITH :AND DISTANT RESPECTIVELY 25 FEET AND 200 FEET NORTHWESTERLY MEA- SURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID HERE- INAFTER DESCRIBED MAIN TRACK CENTER-LINE AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 5 AND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY A LINES DRAWN AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID HERE- INAFTER DESCRIBED MAIN TRACK CENTER- LINE FROM A POINT DISTANT 700 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY MEASURED ALONG SAID HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED MAIN TRACK CENTERLINE FROM. THE SAID NORTH LINE OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5 MAIN TRACK CENTERLINE DESCRIPTION: BEGINNING AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 DISTANT 957. 5 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A STRAIGHT LINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SE1/4 OF SECTION 8 TOWNSHIP 31 NORTH RANGE 21 WEST 4TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DISTANT 463 FEET OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID SEI/4 AND THERE TERMINATING COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT NUMBER 7 HUGO CITY 20.031.21.32.0024 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-M THAT PART OF LOT 26-COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT NUMBER 7 -BEING THAT PORTION OF THE WESTERLY 175 FEET OF BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD COMPANY'S(FORMERLY NORTHERN PACIFIC RAILWAY COMPANY) 250 FOOT WIDE STATION GROUND PROPER- TY AT HUGO MINNESOTA BEING 50 FEET WIDE ON THE EASTERLY SIDE AND 200 FEET WIDE ON THE WESTERLY SIDE OF SAID RAILROAD COMPANY'S HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED MAIN TRACK CENTERLINE AS NOW LOCATED AND SPRINGSTED Page 27 Exhibit 11 CONSTRUCTED UPON OVER AND ACROSS GOVERNMENT LOT 5 IN SECTION 20 TOWNSHIP 31 NORTH RANGE 21 WEST OF THE 4TH PRINCIPAL MERIDAN WASHINGTON COUNTY MINNESOTA LYING BETWEEN TWO LINES DRAWN PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT RESPECTIVELY 25 FEET AND 200 FEET NORTHWESTERLY MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID HERINAFTER DESCRIBED MAIN TRACK CENTERLINE AND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNEMEN LOT 5 AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY A LINE DRAWN AT RIGHT ANGLES TO SAID HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED MAIN TRACK CENTERLINE FROM A POINT DISTANT 700 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF AS MEASURED A- LONG SAID HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED MAIN TRACK CENTERLINE FROM THE SAID NORTH LINE QFGOVERNMENT LOT 5 MAIN TRACT CENTERLINE DESCRIPTION:BE GINNIN6`AT A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 20 DISTANT 957:aFEET: EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER THEREOF THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG A STRAIGH LINE TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SE1/d OF SECTIONS TOWNSHIP 31 NORTH RANGE 21 WEST-4TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN DISTANT 463,FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SAID:SE1/4 AND THERE TERMINATING COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT NUMBER 7 HUGO CITY 20.031.21.33.0005 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-035 PART©F.LOT 35 COMM AT SW CORN OF SWI/4 SEC201`31 R21 THN E ALONG SO LINE FOR 587.20 FT THN N AT RT ANG FOR 163FT TO PT OF BEG THN CONTIN.IN 37FT THN E AT RT ANGLES 284.40FT THN S AT RT ANs LE,37FT TO PT THAT.,IS 5OFT FROM WLY RIW OF NP RR RNW(MEAS AT RT,ANGLES, TO SD RT OFWAY LINE)THN W AT RT ANGLES 284.40FT TO PT OF BEG SD'PARCEL SITU IN LOT 35 CO AUD PLAT#7 20.031.21.33.0006 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-035 PT OF LOT 35 203121 BEING THAT PT DESC AS FOLLOWS PT SW114-SWl/4 I:1ESC AS FOLLOWS BEG AT PT SD PT BEING`ON SINE OF SEC20 AFOREMENTIONED & 587.20FT E OF SW COR OF SD SEC20 THN N AT RIGHT ANG FOR 11OFT THN WLY & PAR TO AFORE MENTIONED S LINE OF SEC20 DIST 75FT THN SAT RIGHT ANG 11OFT TOS LINE OF SD SEC26 THN ELY ON SD S LINE OF SEC20 TO PT OF BEG SUBJ TO EXISTING STREET RNV COUNTY AUDITORS PLAT#7 20.031.21.33.0011 TRAEGER'S ADD PLAT 2 OUTLOT A SUBJ TO PERPETUAL PONDING&FLOWAGE EASEMENT 20.0311.24.34.0076 TRAEGER'SADD PLAT 2 LOT-007 BLOCK-001 TRAEGERS ADD PLAT 2 29.031.21.21.0016 Sect-29 Twp-031 Range-021 PT N1/2-NW1/4 S29131R21 DESC AS FOLL COM AT INTER OF N LN SD SEC WITH ELY LN HWY 61 AS NOW WID TO 111 FT SD PT BEING_1103.76FT E FROM SW COR SD SEC THN E ALG N LN SD SEC 285FT THN S AT RT ANG TO SD N LN 278 .89FT THN W & PARL WITH SD N LN 58.14FT TO POB THN CONT ON SD PARL LN 285.57FT TO INTER WITH ELY LN SD HWY THN S11DEG 53'19"W ALG SD ELY LN 193.61 FT TO PT ON SD ELY LN 866AFT NLY AS WAS ALG SD ELY FROM ITS INTER WITH S LN SD N1/2-NW1/4 THN ELY& PARL WITH SD S LN 325.23FT THN NLY AT RT ANG TO LAST CRS 189.84FT TO POB 29.031.21.21.0099 PINEVIEW MEADOWS 2ND LOT-OOA OUTLOT A 29.031.21.22.0005 Sect-29 Twp-031 Range-021 PT N1/2-NW114 29 3121 BEING PT OF S 20 ACR LYING E OF HWY 61 DESC AS FOLL: BEG AT INTER OF ELY RNV LN HWY 61 A LN 248FT S OF N LN SD S 20 ACR THN ELY& PARL TO N LN SD 20 ACR 384.08FT THN S AT RT ANG 140FT THN WLY TO PT ON SD ELY RNV LN BEING 108.81FT SWLY OF POB THN NLY ALG SD RNV 108.81 FT TO POB 29.031.21.22.0006 Sect-29 Twp-031 Range-021 PT NW1/4-NW1/4 293121 COM AT INTER S LN SD TRACT & E R/W HWY 61 THN N11DEG51'E ALG SD R/W 279.1FT TO POB THN CONT N11DEG51'E ALG SD RNV 222.3FT THN E PARL TO S LN SD NW1/4 40OFT THN S AT RT ANG TO LAST DESC LN 218FT THN W PARL TO S LN SD NW1/4 SPRINGSTED Page 28 Exhibit 445.65FT TO POB EXC THAT PT SD NW1/4 DESC AS FOLL: COM AT INTER OF S LN SD TRACT & E RNV HWY 61 THN NLY ALG SD RNV 399.23FT TO POB THN CONT NLY ALG SD R/W 102.17FT THN E PARL TO S LN SD NW1/4 136.56FT THN ELY ON STRT LN & ITS EXT TO PT 173.36FT E AS MEAS ALG SD PARL LN FROM E R/W LN HWY 61 &5.45FT S FROM SD PARL LN 21.68FT THN S ON LN DRAWN AT RT ANG TO S LN OF SD NW1/4 96.74FT THN W PARL TO SD S LN 178.93FT TO POB 20.031.21.32.0003 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-021 PART OF LOT 21 COM AT A PT ON THE NORTH LINE OF SD LOT 21-75 FT WLY OF THE NE COR OF SD LOT 21 THENCE SLY ALONG THE WEST LINE OF CERTAIN PROPERTY NOW OWNED BY CLARENCE VAIL FOR A DISTANCE OF 324 FT TO-A`'PT THENCE WLY ALONG A LIN E PARELLEL WITH THE NORTH LINE OF SD LOT 21 FOR A DISTANCE OF 50 FT TO A POINT THENCE NLY FOR A DISTANCE OF324FT MORE OR LESS TO A PT ON TH E NORTH LINE OF SD LOT 21,125 FT WLY FROM THE NE COR OF LOT THENCE ELY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SD LOT A DISTANCE OF 50 FT TO THE PLACE OF BEG.COUNTY AUD-PLAT 20.031.21.32.0001 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lo€-021 PART OF LOT 21 BEING THE E 75FT OF THE N 419FT THEREOF COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 20.031.21.32.0006 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 LOT-022 W1/2 LT22 CO AUD PLAT#7 20.031.21.32.0004 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-M 1A EAST 1/2 OF LOT 22 EXCEPT THE EAST 50 FT COUNTY AUD PLAT 20.031.21.32.0007 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-023-.50A WEST 1/2 OF LOT 23 COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.32.0008 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-023 .50AEAST 1/2 OF LOT 23 COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.33.0071 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-035 1A PT LOT 35 ENCOMPASSED BY LINE DESC AS FOLLOWS COM AT SW COR OF SW1/4 OF SEC20 T31N R21W THN E ALONG S LIME OF SD SW114`FOR 587.20FT TO PT OF BEG OF LINE TO BE DESC THN N AT RIGHT ANG 163FT'THN E AT RIGHT ANG FOR 284.40FT TO PT THAT IS 50FT FROM,WLY RNV OF NORTHERN PACIFIC RR RNV MEAS AT RIGHT ANG TO SD R/W LINE'.;THNSWLY PAR TO SD RNV FOR 166.59FT TO S LINE OF SD SW1/4 THN;W ALONG S LINE OF SD SW1/4 FOR 25OFT TO PT OF BEG SUBJ TO PUBLIC RD OVERS 33FT THEREOF CO AUDITORS PLAT#7 20.031.21,32,0010 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-024 PT LOT 24 BEING THE E 52.14 FT OF THE W 104.28 FT 20.031.21.32.0012 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-024 .50A PT OF LOT 24 BEG IN THE N LINE 104.28 FT E FROM THE NW COR THENCE E ALONG N LINE 56 113 FT THENCE S 387 FT PAR WITH W LINE THENCE W 56-1/3 FT THENCE N 387 FT TO BEG. COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.32.0014 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-024 PT LOT 24 BEING E 50 FT OF W 210.6 FT 20.031.21.32.0013 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-024 PT OF LOT 24 BEING W 50 FT OF E 100 FT OF W 310.61 FT.CO AUDITORS PLAT 7 20.031.21.32.0015 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-024.50A PT LOT 24 BEING E 50 FT OF W 310.61 FT BEG AT A PT IN THE N LINE OF SD LOT 5 DISTANT 995.85 FT E OF THE NW COR OF SD LOT 5 THENCE S PAR WITH THE W LINE OF SD LOT 5 A DISTANCE OF 419.51 FT THENCE SELY MAKING AN ANGLE TO THE LEFT OF 76DEG.30'FROM SD LAST DESCRIBED LINE A DISTANCE OF 51.42 FT TO A LINE DRAWN PAR WITH & 50 FT E OF THE FIRST MEN COURSE OF THIS DESCRIPTION THENCE N PAR WITH THE W LINE OF SD LOT 431.23 FT TO A PT IN THE N LINE THEREOF 50 FT E OF THE PT OF BEG THENCE W 50 FT TO THE PT OF BEG COUNTY AUD. PLAT 7 20.031.21.32.0018 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-024 .50A PT LOT 24 BEG AT A PT IN N LINE OF SPRINGSTED Page 29 Exhibit 11 GOV LOT 5 DISTANT 1045.85 FT E OF NW COR OF SD LOT 5 THENCE S PAR WITH W LINE OF SD LOT 5 A DISTANCE OF 431.23 FT THENCE SELY MAKING AN ANGLE TO THE LEFT 75DEG.30 FROM SD LAST DESCRIBED LINE A DIS OF 51.42 FT TO A LINE DRAWN PAR WITH &50 FT E OF FIRST MENTIONED COURSE OF THIS DES THENCE N PAR WITH W LINE OF SD LO T 443.67 FT TO A PT IN N LINE THEREOF 50 FT E OF PT OF BEG THENCE W 50 FT TO PT OF BEG. COUNTY AUD. PLAT 7 20.031.21.32.0011 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-024 1.30A LOT 24 EX THE W 360.61 FT EX TO HECTOR PEPIN COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.24.0042 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-010 .37A S 50 FT:OF LOT 10 EXC 35135-4550 CO.AUDITORS PLAT NO 7 20.031.21.24.0021 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-003 PT N 151FT'OF LOTS 3 &4 LYING S OF N 80FT EXC THAT PT DESC ON QUIT CLAIM DEED REC IN 134 DEEDS 466 SD EXC DESC AS FOLL COMM AT NW COR OF LOT 3 CO AUDITORS PLAT#7 THN RUN SLY DIR ALONG WLY LINE OF SD LOT.3 DIST OF 157FT""TO PT THN RUN ELY DIR & PAR WITH NLY LINE OF LOTS 3;&4 DIST OF 12OFT TO PT OF BEG OF LAND TO BE DESC THN RUN NLY DIR &PAR WITH WLY LINE OF SD LOT 3 DIST OF 30FT TO PT THN RUN IN ELY DIR&PAR WITH NLY LINE OF SD LOTS &4 TO PT ON ELY LINE OF SD LOT 4 THN RUN SLY DIR ALONG ELY LINE OF SID LOT 4 TO PT WHICH IS THE SE COR OF SD LOT 4&NE'COR OF LOT 1 BLK 10 OF HUGO THN RUN IN WLY DIR & PAR WITH NLY LINE OF SD LOTS 3 & 4 TO PT OF BEG OF LAND HEREIN DESC CO AUD PLAT#7 20.031.21.24.0040 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT NO.7 Lot-009 PT OF LTS 9& 10 CO AUDITOR'S PLAT 7 DESC AS FOLL COM AT NE COR OF GOV LOT 4 THN S89DEG05' 26"W BRG BASED ON WASH CO,PROJ COORDINATE SYSTE NORTH ZONE, ALG N LN SD GOV LT;4- DIST 770. 34FT THN.STIDEG01'52"1N DIST 63 6.61FT TO A 1/21NCH IRON`PIPE MON MARKED RLS6617 THN S11DEG01'52"W DIST 100.18FT TO A 1/21 NCH IRON PIPE MON MARKED ANEZ RLS13775 THN N89DEG30'25"E DIS T 221.34FT TO A,1/21NCH IRONPIPE MON MARKED ANEZ RLS13775 & POB THN "S89DEG30'25"W DIST 2 21.34FT'TO SD MON THN N11DEG01 '52"E DIST 100.18FT TO SD MON THN N89DEG30'25"E DIST 119.69F T TO A 1/21NCH IRON PIPE MON M ARKED ANEZ RLS13775 THN CONT N 89DEG30'25"E TO SHRLN EGG LK T HN SWLY ALG SHRLN SD LK TO INT ER LN BRG N89DEG30'25"E FROM P OB THN S89DEG30'25"W TO POB 20.012 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-008 .17A PT OF LOT 8 BEG AT SW COR THENCE E 150 FT THENCE NLY PAR WITH RD 50 FT THENCE W 150 FT THENCE SLY 50 FT TO BEG.COUNTY AUD. PLAT 7 20.031.21.24:0039 COUNTYAUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-008 THAT PART OF LOTS 8 AND 9 OF COUNTY AUDITORS PLAT NUMBER 7 WASHINGTON COUNTY MINNESOTA DESCRIBED AS FOLLOW COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF GOVERNMENT LOT 4- SECTION 20 TOWN- SHIP 31 NORTH RANGE 21 WEST-CITY OF HUGO- WASHINGTON COUNTY MINNESOTA THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 05 MINUTES 26 SECONDS WEST-BASED ON THE WASH INGTON COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM NOR-TH ZONE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF SAID GOVERNMENT LOT 4 A DISTANCE OF 770. 34 FEET THENCE SOUTH 11 DEGREES 01 MINUTE 52 SECONDS WEST A DISTANCE OF 636.61 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED RLS 6617 THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 150 FEET TO A 1/2 INCH IRON PIPE MONUMENT MARKED WITH A PLASTIC CAP INSCRIBED RLS 6617 AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE NORTH 10 DEGREES 51 MINUTES 11 SECONDS EAST 50 FEET THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 25 SECONDS WEST 30 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SPRINGSTED Page 30 Exhibit 11 EASTERLY LINE OR THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSTION OF THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE VAN BUSKIRK PARCEL AS DESCRIBED ON A WARRANTY DEED RECORDED AS DOCUMENT NUMBER 622656 THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID EASTERLY LINE AND/OR ITS EX- TENSION TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID VAN BUSKIRK PARCEL THENCE NORTH WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID VAN BUSKIRK PARCEL TO THE NORTH WESTERLY CORNER OF SAID PARCEL THENC NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LIN OF LOT 8 OF SAID COUNTY AUDITORS PLAT NUMBER 7 TO A POINT DISTANT 271 .54 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE NORTH- WEST CORNER OF LOT 7 OF SAID COUNTY AUDITORS PLAT NUMBER 7 THENCE SOUTH- EASTERLY TO A POINT ON THE SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE RECORDED PLAT OF KENNETH,N GRAN- GER ADDITION AS MONUMENTED DISTANT 303.92 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SAID PLAT THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID SOUTHWEST- ERLY EXTENSION TO A POINT DISTANT 52 .40 FEET SOUTHWESTERLY OF SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 2 OF SAID KENNETH N:GRANGER ADDITION THENCE SOUTHEASTER-LY TO,A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF LOT 3 OF SAID KENNETH N GRANGER ADDITION DISTANT 113 FEET SOUTHERLY OF AN ANGLE POINT IN THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 3 (SAID ANGLE POINT BEING 30 FEET MORE OR LESS`EASTERLY OF THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF OAK STRE- ET AS DEDICATED IN SAID PLAT)THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE WESTERLY LINE.OFSAID LOT 3 TO THE SHORELINE OF EGG LAKE THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY ALONG-,SAID SHORELINE TO THE POINT OF INTERSECT-ION WITH A LINE WHICH BEARS NORTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 25 SECONDS EAST FROM THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 30 MINUTES 2-5 SEC-ONDS WEST ALONG SAID LINE TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING _SUBJECT TGA 64 FOOT WIDE PERMANENT EASEMENT FOR EX-CLUSIVE USE AND POSSESSION FROM THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBE PARCEL TO THE SHORELINE OF EGG LAKE -THE EAST LINE OF SAID EASEMENT IS THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 3 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT NUMBER 3 CITY OF HUGO 20.031.21.24.0034, COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-008 PART OF LOT 8 CO AUDITOR PLAT#7 BEG AT PT ON WILY LINE OF SD CO AUDITOR'S PLAT#7(ALSO ELY LINE OF FOREST BLVD N)DIST 210.54FT SWLY OF NW COR OF LOT 7 OF SD CO AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 THN SWLY ALONG SD ELY LINE DIST OF 61FT THN SELY DIST OF 146.75FT TO PT ON SWLY EXT OF WILY LINE OF REC PLAT OF KENNETH N GRANGER ADD WASHCO MN DIST 303.92FT SWLY OF NW COR OF SD PLAT THN NELY ALONG SD WILY LINE & ITS SWLY EXT DIST OF 63.46FT TO PT DIST 240.46FT SWLY OF NW COR OF SD PLAT THN NWLY DIST OF 146.23FT TO PT OF BEG 20.031.21.24.0033 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-008 PART OF LOT 8 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 BEG AT PT ON WILY LINE OF SD CO AUDITOR'S PLAT#7(ALSO ELY LINE OF FOREST BLVD N) DIST 140.54FT SWLY OF NW COR OF LOT 7 OF SD CO AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 THN SWLY ALONG SD ELY LINE DIST OF 70FT THN SELY DIST OF 146.23FT TO PT ON SWLY EXT OF WILY LINE OF REC PLAT OF KENNETH N GRANGER ADD WASH CO MN DIST 240.46FT SWLY OF NW COR OF SD PLAT THN NELY ALONG SD WLY LINE&ITS SWLY EXT DIST OF 71.5FT TO PT DIST 168.96FT SWLY OF NW COR OF SD PLAT THN NWLY DIST OF 145.58FT TO PT OF BEG 20.031.21.24.0006 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-002 PT LT 2 CTY AUD PLAT#7 COM AT NW COR SD LT 2 THN ON ASSM BRG SODEG28'14"W ALG W LN SD LT 2 470FT TO PT HEREINAFTER REF AS "PT A" THN NODEG28'14"E ALG W LN SD LT 2 60FT THN N89DEG54'43"E AND PARL TO N LN SD LT 2 15OFT TO PT HEREINAFTER REF AS SPRINGSTED Page 31 Exhibit 11 "PT B" TNN CONT N89DEG54'43"E 147.6FT M/L TO WLY R/W LN N P RR THN S11DEG47'28"W ALG SD WILY RNV LN 61AFT TO POB TRACT TO BE DESC THN S89DEG54'43"W AND PARL TO N LN SD LT 2 TO AN INTER W/ LN WHICH BRS SODEG 28'14"W FROM "PT B"THN NODEG 28'14"E .08FT TO INTER W/LN WHICH IS PARL TO N LN SD LT 2 AND WHICH BRS N 89DEG54'43"E FROM "PT A" THN S89DEG54'43"W 15OFT TO "PT A" THN SODEG28' 14"W ALG W LN SD LT 2 149.72 FT TO SW COR SD LT 2 THN N89 DEG50'16"E ALG S LN SD LT 2 250.41FT TO SE COR SD LT 2 THN N11DEG47'28"E ALG WLY R/W LN SD N P RR 152.66FT TO POB 20.031.21.24.0013 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT #7 Lot-002 PART OF LOT 2 BEG AT A POINT ON THE WEST LINE OF SD LOT 2 SAID PT BEING 410 FT SOUTH OF NW COR THENCE N89DEG.33'EAST & PARALLEL TO THE NORTH. LINEOF SD LOT 2 FOR 150 FT THENCE SOUTH FOR 60 FT THENCE SO. 89DEG.33'WEST FOR 150 FT TO THE WEST LINE FOR 60 FT TO POINT OF BEG.COUNTY-AUD. PLAT 20.031.21.24.0016 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-002 PT LOT 2 COM AT NW COR LOT 2 THEN S ALONG W LINE LOT 2 FOR 390 FT TO PT BEG THIS DESC. THEN N89DEG.33' E 150 FT THEN S 20 FT THEN S89DEG.33'W 150 FT TO SD WLY LINE LOT 2 THEN N ALONG SD WLY LINE 20 FT TO PT OF BEG ALSO COM AT NW.CORN LOT 2 THEN S A- LONG W LINE LOT 2 FOR 390 FT THEN N 89DEG.33'E 150:FT TO PT OF BEG.THIS DES THEN CONTINU N89DEG.33'E 147.6 FT M/L TO WLY R/W LINE N P RR CO THEN SLY ALONG WLY R/W LINE SD N.P. RR CO FOR 81.8 FT THEN S89DEG.33'W 131.6 FT M/L THEN N 80 FT TO PT BEG.COUNTY AUD PLAT 7 20.031.21.24.0014 COUNTY AUDITOR'S;PLAT#7 Lot-002 PT LOT 2 BEG AT PT ON W LINE OF SD LOT 2 SD PT BEING 315 FTS, NW COR THEREOF THEN CONTINU S ALONG W LINE DIST OF 75 FT,,TO PT THEN N 89DEG.33'E& PAR TO N LINE OF SD LOT 2 DIST OF 293.5 FT M/L TO WILY EDGE OF N P RR R/W THEN NLY ALONG SD RNV TO PT 309.6 FT M/L E TO PT OF BEG HEREIN ON LINE PAR WITH N LINE F SD LOT 2 THEN S89DEG.33'W& PAR TO N LINE OF SD LOT 2 DIST OF 309.6 FT M/L TO PT OF BEb COUNTY AUL}PLAT 7 20.031.21.24.0032 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT 91, Lot-007 PART OF LOT 7 & 8 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 BEGAT PT ON WLY LINE OF SD CO AUDITOR'S PLAT#7(ALSO ELY LINE OF_FOREST BLVD..N) DIST 70.63FT SWLY OF NW COR OF SD LOT 7 THN SWLY ALONG SD ELY LINE DIST OF 69.91FT THN SELY DIST OF 145.58FT TO PT ON WLY LINE OF REC PLAT OF KENNETH N GRANGER ADD WASH CO MN DIST 168.96FT SWLY OF NW COR OF SD PLAT THN NELY ALONG SD WILY LINE OF SD PLAT DIST OF 75.96FT TO PT DIST 93FT SWLY OF NW COR OF SD PLAT THN NWLY DIST OF 144.93FT TO PT OF BEG 20.031.21.24.0054 KENNETH N GRANGER ADD LOT-001 S 13FT LOT 1 ALL LOT 2 20.031.21.24.0031 COUNTY'AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-007 PART OF LOT 7 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT 7 BEG AT NW COR OF LOT 7 THN SWLY ALONG WILY LINE OF SD LOT 7 (ALSO THE ELY LINE OF FOREST BLVD N) DIST 70.63FT THN SELY DIST OF 144.93FT TO PT ON WILY LINE OF REC PLAT OF KENNETH N GRANGER ADD WASH CO MN .DIST 93FT SWLY OF NW COR OF SD PLAT THN NELY ALONG SD WLY LINE OF SD PLAT DIST OF 93FT TO NW COR OF SD PLAT THN ELY ALONG N LINE OF LOT 7 CO AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 TO PT OF BEG 20.031.21.24.0024 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-005 EXC N 150 FT COUNTY AUD. PLAT NO.7 20.031.21.24.0055 KENNETH N GRANGER ADD LOT-001 EXC S 13FT THEREOF 20.031.21.24.0010 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-002 PART OF LOT 2 BEG AT PT ON W LINE OF SD LOT 2 DIST OF 130FT S OF NW COR OF SD LOT 2 THN N89DEG33E & PAR WITH N LINE OF SD LOT 2 DIST OF 15OFT THN S &PAR WITH W LINE OF SD LOT 2 DIST OF 11OFT THN S89DEG33W & PAR WITH N LINE OF SD LOT 2 DIST OF 15OFT TO W LINE OF SD LOT 2 THN N ALONG W LINE OF SD LOT 2 DIST OF 11 OFT TO PT OF BEG COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 SPRINGSTED Page 32 Exhibit 11 20.031.21.24.0068 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-007 THAT CERTAIN PART OF LOT 7 IN COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT NUMBER 7 IN THE VILL-AGE OF HUGO AND BEING A PART OF GOV- ERNMENT LOT 4 IN SECTION 20 TOWNSHIP 31 RANGE 21 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:BE- GINNING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT 7 THENCE WEST ALONG THE NORTH LINE THEREOF FOR 129.21 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREBY DESCRIBED THENCE CON-TINUING WEST ON SAME COURSE FOR 79. 21 FEET THENCE SOUTH PARALLEL TO THE EAST LINE OF LOT 7 FOR 209 FEET THEN EAST PARALLEL TO DESCRIBED FIRST COURSE FOR 79.21 FEET THENCE NORTH PARALLEL TO DESCRIBED SECOND COURSE FOR 209 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINN- ING-ACCORDING TO THE RECORDED PLAT THEREOF SUBJECT TO ONEKA ROAD ALONG THE FRONT 33 FEET THEREOF COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT NUMBER 7 HUGO CITY 20.031.21.24.0007 COUNTY AUDITOR'S PLAT#7 Lot-002 .17A PART OFLOT2 BEG AT A PT ON THE WEST LINE OF SD LOT 2 - 80 FT SOUTH OF THE NW CORNER THEREOF THENCE NORTH 89DEG.33'E 150 FT THENCE SOUTH 50 FT THENCE SOUTH 89DEG.33'WEST 150 FT TO THE W LINE OF LOT 2 THENCE NORTH ALONG SD WEST LINE 50 FT TO PT OF BEG.EXC E 10 FT.COUNTY AUD.PLAT 7 20.031.21.21.0015 Sect-20 Twp-031 Range-021 PT OF NE1/4 OF NW1/4 203121 BEG A INTER- SECTION OF ELY R/W LINE'OF-STATE TRUMK HWY 61 & NLY'LINE OF ROAD RUNNING EAST&WEST ALONG SOUTH LINE OF SD TRACT&RUN THENCE NLY 208 FT THENCE ELY ON A LINE PAR-ALLEL TO SOUTH LINE OF SD TRACT 208 FT THENCE SLY ON'A LINE PAR-ALLEL TO &208 FT EAST OF SD ELY LINE OF SD HWY 61-208 FT THENCE WLY 208 FT TO PT OF BEG CONTAIN- ING ONE ACRE MORE OR LESS EXC N 20 FT & EXC TO HWY &ALSO EXC THE S 50FT OF THEN 70FT THEREOF HUGO 20.031.21.21.0016 Sect-20Twp-031 Range-021 THAT PT NE1/4-NW1/4 S20T3lR21 DESC AS:COM@NE COR''SD114 'THN ON AZ FROM'N179DEG43'38" ORIEN TO WASH CO COORD 1322.12FT TO,SE COR SD1/4-1/4 THN ON AZ 269 DEG05'26"ALG S LN SD1/4-114 770.38FT TO ELY LN US HWY#61 THN ON AZ 11DEG02'10"ALG SD ELY LN DIST 33.73 TON LN 147 TH ST N THN CONTIN ON AZ 11DEG 02'10"ALG SD ELY LN US HWY 61 208FT TO POB,LAND TO BE DESC: TNN ON AZ 191DEG02'10" ALG SD ELY LN 71.55FT TO MOST SLY LN LAND DESC IN DEED REC IN BK310 DEEDS-PG 525-THN ON AZ 89DEG05 '26" ALG SD S LN DIS 208FT THN ON AZ 11DEG02'10' DIS 71.55FT THN ON AZ 359DEG43'38"DIS 40.74FT THN ON AZ 281 DEG02'10"DIS 195.51FT TO SD ELY LN US HWY#61 THN ON AZ 191DEG02'10" ALG SD ELY LN 83FT TO POBSUBJ TO EASE AND:THAT PT NE1/4-NW1/ 4 S20 DESC:COM@NE CORNSD1/4- 1/4 THN ON AZ FROM N179DEG43' 38" ORIENT TO WASH CO COORDN SYS N ZONE DIS 1322.12FT TO SE CORN SD1/4-1/4 THN ON AZ 269DE G05'2fx'ALG S LN SD1/4-1/4 DIS 391.2FT THN ON AZ 359DEG43'38" PAR WITH W LN SD1/4-1/4 DIS 33 FT TO N LN 147TH ST THN CONTIN ON AZ 359DEG43'38"ALG SD PAR LN DIS 133.50FT TO ELY EXTENS OF MOST SLY LN OF LAND DESC IN W/D REC IN BK 310 DEEDS PG 525 FOR POB OF LAND TO BE DESC THN CONTIN ON AZ 359DEG43'38"ALG SD PAR LN DIS 70FT TO LN ON AZ 89DEG05'26" FROM HEREINAFTER DESC "PT A" THN ON AZ 269DEG05 '26" DIS 123.80FT TO INTERS WITH LN WHICH IS PAR WITH ELY LN US HWY#61 &DIS 208FT ELY OF SD ELY LN AS MEAS ALG SD N LN 147TH ST N THN ON AZ 191DEG02' 10" ALG SD PAR LN DIST 71.55FT TO MOST SLY LN LAND DESC IN BK 310-DEEDS-PG 525 THN ON AZ 89 DEG05'26" ALG ELY EXTENS SD LN DIS 137.83FT TO POB-SD"PT A"IS DESC:COM@NE CORN NE1/4-NW1/4 THN ON AZ FROM N 179DEG43'38" DIS 1322.12FT TO SE CORN SD1/4-1/4 THN ON AZ 269DEG05'26"ALG S LN SD1/4-1/4 DIS 770.38 FT TO ELY LN US HWY#61 THN ON AZ 11DEG02'10" ALG SD ELY LN DIS 33.73FT TO N LN SD 147TH ST N THN CONTIN ON AZ 11DEG02' 10"ALG SD SPRINGSTED Page 33 Exhibit \ ELY LN USHWY#6lDIS 2mF T'P A*TOG AT EASE 20.031.21.32 mm P CL4WA O HWY RM PLAT 14 C A A The aeraencompassed b the TIF Dd§ !c +k also inlcudeall street or 7i&right-of-ways I«aeldupon7ad«m! to the property dm6bd +mE �\ , t Z« .� * � SPRINGSTEO Page 34 Exhibit 111 Assumptions Report City of Hugo, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-2 Downtown Redevelopment Project Scenario A: Total EMV Type of Tax Increment Financing District Redevelopment Maximum Duration of TIF District 25 years from 1st increment Projected Certification Request Date 07/15/07 Decertification Date 12/31/35': (26 Years of Increment) 2007f2008 Base Estimated Market Value $W%,740,300 Estimated blended class rate 1.5419% Original Net Tax Capacity $427,741 Assessment/Collection Year 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 Base Estimated Market Value $27;740,300 $27,740,300 $27,740,300 $27,740,300 Increase in Estimated Market Value 0 11.750,227 21,323,549 31,136,204 Total Estimated Market Value 27. 40.300 39.490,527 49,063,849 58,876;504 Total Net Tax Capacity $4-27:741, $535877 $699,322 $815.602 City of Hugo 35.931114- Washington 5.931`%Washington County 25.651% ISD#624 17.731% Other 3.672% Local Tax Capacity Rate 82.985% Proposed 20062007 Fiscal Disparities Contribution From TIF District 32.3370% Administrative Retainage Percent(maximum 10%) 10,00% Pooling Percent 0.00% Bonds Note(Pay-As-You-Go) Bonds Dated Note Dated 07/15/07 Bond Issue @ 0.00%(NIC) Note Rate 5,00% Eligible Project Costs Note Amount $16,300,000 Present Value Date&Rate-..,, 07/15/07 5.00"lo Notes 'Original net tax capacity estimated assuming current classification of property as blend of residential and commercial. Future base tax capacity may be adjusted as future developments occur. Assumptions include no future changes to the property tax system, class rates and tax rate. Includes preliminary 2007 tax rates provided by County and 2.5%annual market value inflator. Proposed construction schedule commencing in 2008 for all types of development(residential and commercial) and is staggered over an 8-10 year period SPRINGSTED Exhibit IV Projected Tax Increment Report City of Hugo, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing(Redevelopment) District No.1-2 Downtown Redevelopment Project Scenario A;Total EMV Less: Less: Retained Times: Less: Less: Annual Total Original Fiscal Captured Tax Annual+ State Aud. Admin. Annual Period Net Tax Net Tax Disp. @ Net Tax Capacity Gross Tax Deduction Retainage Net Ending Capacity Capacity 0.0000% Capacity Rate Increment 0.360°x6 10.00% Revenue 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 12/31/07 427,741 427,741 0 0 82.985% 0 0 0 0 12/31/08 427,741 427,741 0 0 82.985% 0 0 0 0 12/31/09 427,741 427,741 0 0 :> 82.985% 0 0 0 0 12/31/10 585,877 427,741 0 158,136 .82.985°/x, 131,229 472 13,076 117,681 12/31/11 699,322 427,741 0 271,581 82.98594 225,371 811 22,456 202,104 12/31/12 815,602 427,741 0 387,861 6205%` 321,867 1,159 32,071 288,637 12/31/13 934,790 427,741 0 507,049 82.98594 420,775 1,515 41,926 377,334 12/31/14 1,294,422 427,741 0 "•866081 82.985% 719,215 2,589 71,663 644,963 12/31/15 1,663,044 427,741 0 1;235`,303 82.9859% 1,025,116 3,690 102,143 919,283 12/31/16 2,040,882 427,741 0 1,61314182.985% 1,338,665 4,819 133,385 1,200,461 12/31/17 2,428,166 427,741 0 2,000,425 82.885% 1,660,053 5,976 165,408 1,488,669 12/31/18 2,478,195 427,741 0 2,050,454 82.885°/6 1,701,570 6,126 169,544 1,525,900 12/31/19 2,529,476 427,741 0 2,101,735 82.9850/0` 1,744,124 6,279 173,785 1,564,060 12/31/20 2,582,038 427,741 Q 2,154,297 82.985% 1,787,743 6,436 178,131 1,603,176 12/31/21 2,635,914 427,741 0 2,208173" 82.985% 1,832,452 6,597 182,586 1,643,269 12/31/22 2,691,137 427,741 0 2,263,396 82.985% 1,878,279 6,762 187,152 1,684,365 12/31/23 2,747,741 427,741 ' 0 2,320,000 82.985% 1,925,252 6,931 191,832 1,726,489 12/31/24 2,805,759 427,741 0 2,378,018 82.985% 1,973,398 7,104 196,629 1,769,665 12/31/25 2,865,229 427,741 0 2,437,488 82.985% 2,022,749 7,282 201,547 1,813,920 12/31/26 2,926,184 427,741 0 "`2,498:;443 82.985% 2,073,333 7,464 206,587 1,859,282 12/31/27 2,988,664 427,741 .0 2,580;923 82.985% 2,125,182 7,651 211,753 1,905,778 12/31/28 3,052,706 427,741 0 2,624,965' 82.985% 2,178,327 7,842 217,049 1,953,436 12/31/29 3,118,349 427,741 0 2,690,608 82.985% 2,232,801 8,038 222,476 2,002,287 12/31/30 3,185,633 427,741 0 2,757,892 82.985% 2,288,637 8,239 228,040 2,052,358 12/31/31 3,254,599"" 427,741 0 2,826,858 82.985°x6 2,345,868 8,445 233,742 2,103,681 12/31/32 3,325,289>, 427,741 0 2,897,548 82.985% 2,404,530 8,656 239,587 2,156,287 12/31/33 3,397,747 427,741 0 2,970,006 82.985% 2,464,659 8,873 245,579 2,210,207 12/31/34 3,472,016 427,741 0 3,044,275 82.985% 2,526,291 9,095 251,720 2,265,476 12/31/35 3,548,141 427,741 0 3,120,400 82.985% 2,589,464 9,322 258,014 1 2,322,128 $43,936,950 $158,173 $4,377,881 $39,40 896 SPRINGSTED Page 36 Exhibit V Estimated Impact on Other Taxing Jurisdictions Report City of Hugo, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No.1.2 Downtown Redevelopment Project Scenario A; Total EMV Without Project or TIF District With Protect and TIF District Projected Hypothetical 2006.2007 2006/2007 Retained New Hypothetical Hypothetical Tax Generated Taxable 2006/2007 Taxable Captured Taxable Adjusted Decrease In by Retained Taxing Net Tax Local Net Tax Net Tax Net Tax Local Local Captured Jurisdiction Capacity(1) Tax Rate Capacity(1) + Capacity = Capacity Tax Rate(') Tax Rate(') N.T.C.(') City of Hugo 12,686,692 35.931% 12,686,692 $3,120,400 15,807,092 26:838% 7.093% 899,862 Washington County 274.223,600 25.651% 274,223,600 3,120,400 277,344,000 25.362% 0.289% 791,408 ISD#624 10,365,049 17.731% 10,365,049 3,120,400 13,485,449 13.628% 4.103% 425,255 Other(2) --- 3.672% --- 3,120,400 --- 3.672% --- --- Totals 82.985°h 71.501% 11.484% Statement 1: If the projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the:TIF Distrlctwas hypothetically available to each of the taxing jurisdictions above,the result would be'`a lower local tax rate(see:Hypothetical Adjusted Tax Rate above) which would produce the, amount of taxes for each taxing jurisdiction. In such a case,the total local tax rate would decrease by 11,484%(see Hypothetical Decrease in Local Tax Rate above). The hypothetical tax that the Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District Would generate is also shown above. Statement 2: Since the projected Retained Captured Net Tax Capacity of the TIF District is not available to the taxing jurisdictions, then there is no impact on taxes levied or local tax fates. (1) Taxable net tax capacity=total net tax`capacity-,captured TIF-,fiscal disparity contribution,if applicable. (2) The impact on these taxing jurisdictions is negligible since they represent only 4.42%of the total tax rate. SPRINGSTED Page 37 Exhibit VI Market Value Analysis Report City of Hugo, Minnesota Tax Increment Financing (Redevelopment) District No. 1-2 Downtown Redevelopment Project Scenario A: Total EMV Assumptions Present Value Date 07115/07 P.V. Rate- Gross T.I. 5.00% Increase in EMV With TIF District $260,390.671 Less: P.V of Gross Tax Increment 18,466,937 Subtotal $241,923,734 Less: Increase in EMV Without TIF 0 Difference $241,923,734 Annual, Present Gross Tax Value @ Year Increment 5.00% 1 2010 131;229 112,199 2 2011 225,371 183,513 3 2012 321,867 249,607 4 2013 420,775 310,771 5 . 2014 719215 505,895 6 2015 x;:025116 686,729 7 2016 1,338,665 854,073 8 2017 1,660,053 1,008,685 9 2018 1,7031:570 984,678 10 - 2019 .1;744;124 961,241 11 : 2020 1.787,743 938,363 12 2021 1,832.452 916,029 13 2022 1;878:279 894,226 14 2023 11925;252 872,942 15 2024 1.973.398 852,164 16 2025 2,022,749 831,881 17 2026 2;073;333 812,080 1,8 2027 2;125;182 792,751 19, 2028 2.178.327 773,882 20 2029 2,232,801 755,461 21 2030 2;288,637 737,479 22 2031 2,345;868 719,925 23 2032 2,404,530 702,788 24 2033 2,464,659 686,059 25 2034 2:526;291 669,729 26 2035 2;589;464 653,787 $43,936,950 $18,466,937 SPRINGSTED Exhibit V11 REDEVELOPMENT QUALIFICATIONS FOR THE DISTRICT Narrative of Substandard Buildings Test MN Statutues 469.174 Subd. 10. The City made multiple attempts to receive permission to gain access into 96 buildings (excluding out-buildings) in the proposed Tax Increment Financing (TIF) district. The City sent out letters three separate times to every property owner asking for permission to access their property for an inspection of general and code deficiencies. A percentage of the property owners sent back post cards stating that they would accept the exterior/interior inspection. The property owners that did not respond were contacted by phone and verbally asked for permission to allow the inspection. Those that responded with a post card stating that they would not accept the,interior inspection were also contacted by phone to verbally request permission to inspect. This was done to provide more information to the property owner on why the City would like permission to conduct the inspections. The overall inspection process for the substandard buildings test wasdone by the City's Building Department Inspectors. Detailed information, including pictures,was gathered on each and every building that was inspected in the proposed district. Each parcel within the proposed district was designated its overt ,file, and each,119 contains detailed information about the buildings on that parcel and information related to the process of getting permission to inspect and the actual inspection, if it took place. Also included in the file are photographs of each building that was.either internally or externally inspected. The Building Inspectors gained access to the int6fior of 50 buildings (52%);out of the total 96 buildings (excluding out- buildings)in the district.They also completed exterior irspections of 23 of the remaining 46 buildings that they could not gain access to internally. Of the 96 buildings in the district, the City,determined that 57 met'the substandard buildings test. Therefore 59.38%of the buildings qualify as substandard as per'MW Statutes 469.174,Subd. 10. Of the buikfings that met the substandard test, 31 buildings(54%)had both an internal and external inspection. All of the buildings discussed herein as having met the qualifications of the substandard test, met both the general deficiency AND the 15%code deficiency test.The code deficiencies were calculated in a table by gathering cost data from RS Means, a resource used to estimate the cost of "various construction components. All general deficiencies were outlined in the building inspection reports for each building. SPRINGSTED KIDz-n-BIZ Date: April 22, 2007 Location: Oneka Elementary School Time: 1:00 to 4:00 PM Business Responsibility: • You will be provided a table to place your materials and greet the families as they move around. • You will provide the staff at your table. Games: • All games will be in the Gymnasium. • There will be a game between every two businesses. • Each game will be supervised by students from the White Bear School District. • The City of Hugo will provide a Tots Play Area for families with small children. Cookie Contest: • Cookies will be judged and a BIG CHIPPER trophy awarded. Entertainment: • The Talent for this event is in process. Publicity: • Ads have been placed in the Hugo City flier and The Citizen Newspaper. • Fliers are being developed to post at local businesses. Area schools will receive handouts to be sent home with the KidZ. Prizes: • Each Kid will receive tickets to place in a container/s next to the Raffle prize they wish to take a chance on. • Individual games will award small toys for playing. Food/Beverage: • Food and beverages will be sold in the Cafeteria. NO FOOD OR DRINK IS ALLOWED IN THE GYMNASIUM! Kidz-n-Biz Committee Louis Melamed Mike Ericson Janine Ketchel Katie Riopel Phil Klein r MEMORANDUM TO: County Economic Development Work Group FROM: Craig A. Waldron, City Administrator DATE: February 16, 2007 SU11JEC1': Progress of the Working Subcommittee 1. On Thursday, February 15, the Working Group convened to discuss the next step relating to the County/City economic development discussion. After some very positive discussion with respect to the various perspectives on the issue, a two-fold approach was formulated. 2. The first element of the approach involves addressing the essentialop licX differences between the County and the Cities with respect to abatement and tax increment. It was decided that working to developop licy agreement and subsequent, implementation guidelines would be the most important component of the City/County economic development discussion. 3. In that light, it was agreed that the first step would entail ascertaining City/County priorities for economic development. This could include such diverse items as the potential of high paying jobs to development that would reduce and/or assist the County's funding of it for services, general tax base, high paying jobs, development in strategic geographic locations, etc. I will be working with Molly in developing a comprehensive list of the areas that initially appear to be of higgh priority to the Cities and the County. I would respectfully request that you would forward to me the type of economic development that reflects your particular community's priority. 4. Once the subcommittee has developed the priorities, the County Board will review the respective priorities with the intent to establish a level of comfort where the Cities/County would share mutual priorities to, in turn, work on modifying the abatement and tax increment concerns based on these areas of common concern. The ultimate outcome would be to agree on priority areas, modify the respective policies where we currently have differences of opinion and subsequently, develop clear methodologies on how to move forward in these areas where there is essential agreement. 5. The second phase will entail researching the various entities that have been successful in terms of developing a re onal perspective. It has been discussed, with the demise of Metro East, that we lack a regional/area- wide approach to economic development. Mayor Hargis will be working spearheading this component and reviewing the positive elements of Metro East that we could build upon, as well as other successful area- wide approaches. The anticipated outcome here is to eventually develop an area-wide organization, at least in Washington County, to fill the void of the Metro East. 2 MEMORANDUM TO: County Economic Development Work Grou FROM: Craig Waldron,Administrator - City of Oak DATE: March 8, 2007 SUBJECT: Common City Goals and Priorities for Economic Develo went 1. As my memo from February 16 pointed out, we are now mo ng forward with a two-fold approach with respect to our working subcommittee. The item that I have been asked to work on relates to the policy differences between the County and the Cities with respect to tax abatement and tax increment 2. At our subcommittee level it was agreed that the participating cities would at first develop and forward their respective development criteria and prionties. Subsequently, the County Board would review these priorities with the intent of establishing a level of comfort where the County and the Cities could make policy and implementation changes, at a minimum, in the priority areas. 3. What follows is a summary of the various City priorities that were culled from the respective materials submitted by Woodbury, Newport and Oakdale. They are depicted as follows: A. Jobs All three cities mention projects that create solid, high paying employment opportunities. This pertains to both job retention and the creation of significant new employment opportunities. B. Redevelopment A main concern for the communities is the rehabilitation or redevelopment of blighted or substandard properties in the community. i Page 2 - i C. Transportation # i A third point of common interest is providing adequate transportation routes to new developments. This is to ensure the safe, convenient, and efficient movement of persons and goods through communities, and is critical to retaining and creating business opportunities. 1 D. Preservation and Expansion of Tax Base All three communities cite the need to preserve and develop the city tax base. a i E. Public Benefit Stressed - Priority is given to public improvements that would provide a benefit to the T entire community, including infrastructure such as water, sewer and j roadway improvements. F. Long-Term Benefits vs. Short-Term Benefits All of the communities cite the importance that any public assistance be - given for projects that will bring a long-terns benefit to the area. These include preserving and increasing quality of life, and creating conditions for further growth in the community. 4. At this point, we would request that the County Board review these priorities to ascertain if there are areas of commonality where it would be useful to consider abatement and tax increment modifications. Agan, the ultimate outcome would be to agree on priority areas, modify the respective policies where differences currently exist, and; subsequently, develop clear methodology on how to move forward in these areas where there is essential agreement. i MEETING NOTICE Washington County Local Government Administrators' Meeting Wednesday, March 14, 2007, 12:00 noon Washington County Government Center 1494962 nd Street North, Stillwater, Minnesota Conference Room 21 (Lower Level - South Wing) AGENDA 1. Welcome & Introductions • Mike Ericson, Hugo City Administrator 2. Legislative Update • Louis Jambois, Metro Cities Executive Director 3. Report on Economic Development Round Table • Craig Waldron, Oakdale City Administrator 4. Washington County 800 MHz Communications Program 5. Update on Roundabouts in Washington County 6. Revenue & Expenditure Projection for Washington County 7_ Minnesota Department of Health - PFC Water Discussion 8. New Business 9. Adjourn City of Hugo 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Open House#1 � February 26, 2007 SWOT (Strengths,Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) Objective: To identify strengths,weaknesses, opportunities and threats in Hugo. What are Hugo's greatest strengths? What makes the City a great place to live? Please list at least 5 things you think make Hugo great. (Strengths can refer to the community, the people,public facilities, natural resources, character,governance, etc.) What are Hugo's weaknesses? Where does Hugo fall short from your perspective? What are the greatest opportunities in the community? What things do we do well already,but could do better? What areas do we fall short in that we could be better at?Where are the greatest opportunities for the community? What things stand in the way of achieving the opportunities or maintaining our strengths? What threatens the community or city from achieving their goals? Vision Hugo 2030 Objective: To define a vision for this process. What do you want Hugo to look like in the future? If you were to leave Hugo and come back in 20 years what would you see? What does the landscape look like? What types of land uses would you see? Are there specific elements in the community today that would remain into the future? What do neighborhoods look like? Where is commercial development? What is Hugo known for? Are there any changes you would like the City to make for your property? Yes ❑ No ❑ If you answered,yes,please describe specifically the changes you would like to see for your property(This may be a change in land use designation, preservation of a significant natural resource,etc.). Please provide your contact information below,so that we can contact you if we have any questions about your comments: Name: Property Address: Mailing Address(if different from mailing address): Phone: Email: Would you like to be added to the email list to receive updates on the 2008 Hugo Comprehensive Plan? Yes ❑ No ❑ Please complete this form and leave at the front desk before you leave tonight. If you are unable to complete the form at the open, please submit the completed form no later than Tuesday,March 6, 2007 to: Hugo City Hall, 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North, Hugo, MN 55038(fax: 651- 426-2859 or email mlindau ci.hugo.mn.us). LANDFORM MINNEAPOLIS• PHOENIX PLANNING 800C BUTLER SQUARE 100 NORTH SIXTH STREET COMMISSION SWOT MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 OFFICE: 612.252.9070 MARCH 8, 2007 FAX: 612.252.9077 City of Hugo 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update PLANNING COMMISSION SWOT: Strengths 1. Small town feel-Downtown core 2. Rural atmosphere -Agriculture -Farming 3. Forests, lakes, streams-Natural Resources 4. Horses at Subway-on trail on Hwy 61 5. Wildlife-wild turkeys,pheasants 6. Good neighbors 7. Close to St. Paul and White Bear Lake 8. Recognizing Challenges/Opportunity to plan 9. Access is easy to freeway 10. Open spaces Weaknesses 1. Need stoplight at 147`h &Highway 61 2. Not enough trails and sidewalks (Limited connectivity to parks) 3. Entrance to the City on CSAH 8 doesn't reflect the true character of Hugo 4. Community has no character 5. Lack of unity-separate school districts, post offices,demographics, etc. 6. Speed and Density of growth were too much -Morphed not evolved -Impacts city reputation 7. No Library 8. No Community Swimming Pool 9. Taxes(County and School)make it difficult for land owners to stay on their land. Opportunities 1. Northern Gateway Planning learn from western gateway 2. Southern Gateway Planning :�:� 3. Downtown Plan/Development -Where is "Downtown?" -What is "Downtown?" 4. Create pedestrian connections 5. Create a transportation plan -look at intersections +access -Highway 61 plan 6. Define and preserve a lifestyle (Lifestyle is what you do/Character is what you see) 7. Take advantage of remaining large open space for park use. Threats 1. Cost of public improvements 2. Increased City taxes 3. Over development -Too much density -Failure to preserve significant open space -expansion of the MUSA 4. Economic pressures that drive development 5. Aging population (Especially on north and east) -Selling land and moving(which leads to development) 6. Divided community(School districts,etc.) -Makes creation and character(or unique identity)difficult Vision 1. Stay Rural (open space, not necessarily farming) 2. Preservation of Natural Resources(trees,lakes, streams) 3. A good place to raise your kids 4. Opportunity to stay in Hugo after Retirement 5. Allow kids to experience parent's experiences (lifestyle or transfer of values) 6. Lifecycle community 7. Retain Heritage of long term residents/families 8. Keep the Commercial Core in Downtown 9. Pedestrian friendly downtown-park once stop twice 10. A community center in downtown for people to gather 11. Strong pedestrian connections between all parks and schools 12. Equestrian Friendly 13. Strong Commercial/Industrial tax base 14. Maintain City services at minimal costs to residents 15. Maintain balance between SF+MF homes 16. Provide affordable housing opportunities. LANDFORM MINNEAPOLIS - PHOENIX SUMMARY OF OPEN 800C BUTLER SQUARE 100 NORTH SIXTH STREET HOUSE HELD MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55403 OFFICE: 612.252.9070 FEBRUARY 26, 2007 FAX: 612.252.9077 City of Hugo 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update SWOT SUMMARY: Strengths: • Hugo's main strength (and what used to be the primary attraction for prospective newcomers) was it's rural character-opportunities to own a horse, to hobby farm, to hunt on your own land, to get away from the typical subdivision's quarter-acre lots and accompanying frustrations with neighbors. Unfortunately, this "Strength" is fading with city hall's current development—oriented policies. • 1. Council, 2. Staff, 3.Small town feeling, 4.Snomobile trails, 5. Protection open space. • Hugo is not a great place to live. Don't presume that it is. It can become a better place to live. • Minimal opportunity for development. Good farmland. Close to White Bear and Stillwater. Closer to a "Grand" lifestyle, without the land price. Logical road system-east side. • Small town feel. Current mix of Rural, Residential, and Commercial. • Small town, rural atmosphere. Small, community schools. Rural feel of neighbors. Smaller businesses. Little or no traffic issues. (until recently.) • Small town- involvement of citizens. Location- a safe place to raise a family. Opportunity for growth — business development. New schools- we have children that will start elementary soon. • The wild life. Great neighbors. Open land for recreation. Page 1 of 5 City of Hugo SWOT Summary—Open House No. 1 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update March 14, 2007 • Small town feeling still. E.g.: Good Neighbor Days, The Wild Life. The asphalt path along Hwy 61. Festival Foods. • Rural Character. Woods/Wetlands/Wildlife. General Tolerance/Acceptance. Not superior in attitude. Weaknesses: • The diversity of interests and lifestyles is not conducive to the creation of the "community" the City seems to desire. The City does not deal with problems directly. I sense that issues are avoided hoping they may go away. • Unclear Plans. Creates fear and worry. No commitment to farmers. Unfair tax- Rural area is paying for services for city people. No loyalty to local businesses- encouraging Big Box at the expense of the community. Horse people are ignored. P.S. Website is bad, get some help! • The greatest weakness (and threat to the above strength) is 20 + years of city officials failing to honor and preserve Hugo's rural lifestyle. Instead, city officials have catered to developers and parroted the mantra that "development pays for itself and, therefore, longtime residents won't see development related tax increases." The reality is that snowballing development causes a community to chase its own tail:The city expands infrastructure for anticipated development and then needs to attract more development to pay for the infrastructure. • 1. No Police Department, 2. Letting too many town homes be built, 3. Worried about rental property. • Need community center like Shoreview with pools, tennis courts, etc. Need a Public Library. • Need stop lights at 1301h & Hwy 61 • Not sure yet, time will tell. • A lot of growth in a short time, not able to properly flow traffic. (Example: need a stoplight at 147th & Hwy 61) among other intersections. • Poor street maintenance on dirt roads. Raising taxes across the board with no benefits. Benefits are developed and given to new developments with total disregard and even detriment to old land owners. 2 City of Hugo SWOT Summary—Open House No. 1 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update March 14, 2007 • Too much multi-housing. Town homes, condos, etc. Grading dirt roads and cutting grass along the side of the roads. • Shortsighted eager to jump in without full consideration of long-term consequences. Misuse of TIF. Dependence on Landform & WSB/gets the business & city officials. No transparency, attempts to involve constituency, seems like lip service, obligated to, but dislike the "outside" interference. The good of boys know what's best. Opportunities: • We have the opportunity to be a city with two streets- one suburban, and one rural. • It's critical for city officials to regain control over Hugo's future and to salvage some of its rural heritage. To a degree, officials do that when they insist that development (at least in the near-term) first take place west of the Highway 61 corridor. • Parks and Trails Systems (Greatest Opportunity), School System (Great). • Develop a better trail system. Let the east side of Hugo join Grant. Push more cost on developers not the whole city. • Offer a chance to provide input. Keep us informed. • Our greatest opportunity is to look at other communities that have grown or faced our issues and learn from them. I think we should stop, educate, inform, and see what "Our Educated Hugo" wants in the future. • Opportunity to set a high standard for development. Opportunity to start a business, which we are interested in doing. Opportunity to have other cities model Hugo. • Communicating to the residents, this was a good meeting. • The asphalt trail on 61 is wonderful. You also have little neighborhoods and communities that have amenities that exclude each other. Ex. Community pools and Rec. centers, there should be a main community Rec center. • Historically an area for truck crops (Commodities like corn and soybeans) partially due to high water table- farm l2nd is only attractive as potential for development dollar. How about assessing abstracts. Return to the old fashioned sense of community. Growing food that the neighbors eat-helping each other 3 City of Hugo SWOT Summary—Open House No. 1 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update March 14, 2007 with say the hay. Harvest pavement and suburban lawns can be detrimental to water quality. Threats: • It has goals?What's the vision? Council and planning commission ignored. Rudeness of the council. Poor advice too much dependence on outside consultants, whose bias is "Build" so we can sell you more services. Style vs. Substance, just look how the mayor dresses! It's pretty clear most decisions are made at either the Legion or the Lions. Strong gender bias. No respect for the environment. • Continuing the thought from the "Opportunities Discussion": There are growing pressure for development East of the Highway 61 corridor. Can city officials resist pressures from some landowners for premature expansion of the MUSA? Can city officials regain the trust of Hugo's voters after recent instances where the mayor and council adopted an attitude of 'We know better than you what's good for you" and resorted to backdoor methods to build a new fire station and city hall? • Town homes becoming a rental and low income property. • An entrenched power clique. And a planning team that favor fads over substance. • First, we need to better identify the goals-then plan, as none of this has been worked at since 1998. We should start from scratch. We now have the time since our choice of major development has not been delayed by the economy. • High Taxes. Too much multi-family housing. • Inadequate consideration before going ahead — city hall, firehouse, and public works building. Disregard of opposition/ are these really the best designs/what about long-term needs. Needed more plowing before proper plans for such. Vague about fulfilling future needs for police protection. County Road 8- before overpass design finalized. (And why are we paying for landscaping-who's aesthetic). The placement of the Hugo city sign- behind advertising condemnation of farm, now Wagner's? Downtown plan = surprise. Rural Preservation statute = surprise Vision • Park & Ride at 170`h/ Rush Line Corridor. Stop/access to new interchange at 35E. Designated recreational areas- hiking, biking, and horseback riding. (and yes, probably trails for motorized vehicles), orchards, organic farms, come CSA, 4 City of Hugo SWOT Summary—Open House No. 1 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update March 14, 2007 busy farmers market, independent businesses, cottage industries, an active interest in land stewardship, protected natural resources, no big block parking lots. • We would like to se Hugo's rural character preserved in the majority of the city east of the Highway 61 corridor by sticking with 5- or 10- acre minimums for areas east of the Highway 61 corridor. Limit future commercial development and quarter-acre lot residential developments to the area west of the Highway 61 corridor. • To see 170 acres of land preserved between Elmcrest and Everton! • Nothing but homes in open land. • 1 believe the city would be full of thriving businesses, and many more housing divisions, with the "Small town"feel and appearance. Neighborhoods are communities in themselves that encourage interaction among children/parents. • Love to see a community center and very little Big Box Stores. National Companies in big malls are ugly. Please don't make us look like Woodbury. We'd love to see a naturally beautiful well designed downtown w/a lot of local/small businesses being primary tenants. • There's no reason}to come back. Clean up of the industrial crap. Motorized and UN motorized trails including horse trails. Create an aesthetic identity. Open space and agriculture including horse farms. • Just like it look today, bad roads, hodgepodge housing, and agricultural land use. 5 City of Hugo 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Open House#t .._... February 26, 2007 SWOT(Strengths,Weaknesses,Opportunities,Threats) Objective: To identify strengths, weaknesses,opportunities and threats in Hugo. What are Hugo's greatest strengths? What makes the City a great place to live? Please fisc at least 5 kgs you think make Flugo grea- (Strengflu can refer to the corrrntx*,ft people,public facMes, naft"resumes,dkvacter,governance,efc.) fo • P op — �'n What are Hugo's weaknesses? Where does Hugo fall short from your ? A2 Y/✓V x4 o� ��t��cs tS 4c_ leets_—o Ns r Me ucJ no /fes 'k, re wts�i y , tc++�SG A,,( What are the greatest opportunities in the commurity? What things do we do well already,but could do betted What areas do we W short in that we could be better at?Where are tie greatest opportunities for the community? What things stand in the way of achieving the opportunities or maintaining our strengths? What threatens the community or city frog►w*vng their goals? Vision Hugo 2030 Objective: To define a vision for this process. What do you want Hugo to took like in the future? If you were to leave Hugo and come back in 20 years what would you see? What does the landscape look tike? What types of land uses would you see? Are there specific elements in the community today that would remain into the future? What do n*hborthoods look like? Where is commercial development? What is Hugo known for? Are there any changes you would like the City to make for your property? Yes❑ No NJ If you answered,yes,please describe specifically the changes you would Eike b see for your property(This may be a change in land use designation,preservation of a significant natural resource,etc.). Please provide your contact information below,so that we can contact you 9 we have any questions about your comments: Name: �- Property Address: Mailing Address(if different loom mailing address) Phone: Email: Would you like to beto the email list to receive updates on the 2008 Hugo Comprehensive Plan? Yes ElNo 7 Please complete this form and leave at the front desk before you leave tonight. If you are unable to complete the form at the open,please submit the completed form no later than Tuesday,March 6, 2007 to: Hugo City Hal, 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North,Hugo,MN 55038(fax: 651- 426-2859 or email mlindau0ci.hugo.mn.us}. City of Hugo d 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Open House#1 February 26,2007 SWOT(Strengths,Weaknesses,Opportunities,Threats) Objective: To identify strengths, weaknesses,opportunities and threats in Hugo. What are Hugo's greatest strenos? What makes the City a great plaoe to live? Please list at least 5 things you think make Hugo great. (StrengBxs can refer to the oornmunify,the people,pubic faciities, natural resources,character,governance,etc.) OL What are Hugo's weaknesses? Where does Hugo tall short from your perspective? MAO- What a e the cu o r¢.s ni n r`�` ? What do we do weN ake bW could do greatest opportu `fie comrrx�nity. things ady, better? What areas do we fall short in that we could be better at?Where are the greatest opportunities for the oorrxnur>rtY? What things stand in the way of achieving the opportunities or maintamV our strengths? What threatens the community or city from achieving their goals? Ta kks ��_sa�.���i:�_--� _�-�►_-�_---ems. m-, ����- t o•S.< <p�0.tb AAL* sae Go.M Sal t su u►1 o v�1. v L cv V S s v�toS�a�• c.► -S�4"t l cxk `r pW`�L e V1M c p,- Lk 1i`Q-�o&P4 & c-�s t v%. C ..st Vision Hugo 2030 Objective: To define a vision for this process. What do you want Hugo to look like in the future? If you were to leave Hugo and come back in 20 years what would you see? What does the landscape look like? What types of land uses would you see? Are there specific efernents in the community today that would remain into the hkxe? What do neighborhoods look like? Where is commercial development? What is Hugo known for? `Iti.t�-a'^ o�► snnw� ;-• c.,n.a (o. �G�. Ctgw_ �!?Q SDA ►lam Are there any changes you would lice ft City to make for your propertfR Yes No ❑ If you answered,yes,please describe specifi *the charges you would like to see for your property(This may be a change in land use designation,preservation of a sgn4cant natural resource,etc.). Pie"provide your contact whormabon below,so drat we can contact you 6 we have any questions about your corrowls: Property Address: Mailirxl Address of different from mailing address): -.....___.._.._-- Email: 1'000,t CO-1> Ic t,c w,w , w Would you like to be added to the email list to receive updates on the 2008 Hugo Comprehensive Plan? Yes p No ❑ Please complete this form and leave at the front desk before you leave tonight. If you are unable to complete the form at the open,please submit the completed form no later than Tuesday,March 6, 2007 to: Hugo City Hal,14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North,Hugo,MN 55038(fax: 651- 426-2859 or email mlrndau0d.hugo.mn.us). City of Hugo 2408 Comprehensive Plan Update Open House#1 February 26, 2007 SWOT(Strengths,Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) Objective: To identify strengths, weaknesses,opportunities and threats in Hugo. What are Hugo's greatest strengths? What makes the City a great place to live? Please list at least 5 things you think make Hugo great. (Strengths can refer to the corrxnunity,the people,public faciities, natural resources,charader,governance,etc.) What are Hugo weaknesses? Where does Hugo fall short from your perspec ? What are the greatest opportunities in the community? What things do we do well already,but could do better? What areas do we fall short in that we could be better at?Where are the greatest opportunities for the community? What things stand in the way of achieving the opportunities or maintaining our strengths? What threatens the community or city from achieving their goats? Vision Hugo 2030 Objective: To define a vision for this process. What do you want Hugo to look like in the future? If you were to leave Hugo and come back in 20 years what would you see? What does the landscape look like? What types of land uses would you see? Are there specific elements in the community today that would remain into the future? What do neighborhoods look Ike? Where is commercial development? What is Hugo known for`? Are there any changes you would like the City to make for your property? Yes❑ No Ul' If you answered,yes,please describe sP lr the changes you would like to see for yaw property(Thm may be a change in land use designation,preservation of a significant natural resource,etc.)- Please provide your contact information below,so that we can contact you if we have any questions about YOLK comments: Name:_ Property Address: � � Mailing Address(if different from mailing address): �s/ - 33 -- Email: A6: S ►e:en Would you Ike to be added to the email fist b receive updates on the 2008 Htgo Comprehensive Plan? Yes, No O Please complete this form and leave at the front desk before you leave tonight. If you are unable to complete the form at the open,please submit the completed form no later than Tuesday,March 6, 2007 to: Hugo City Hal,14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North,Hugo,MN 55038(fax: 651- 426-2859 or email mlindaLKft.hugo.mn.usl- City of Hugo a 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Open House#1 February 26, 2007 SWOT(Strengths,Weaknesses,Opportunities,Threats) Objective: To identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in Hugo. What are Hugo's greatest strengtho what makes tha City a great place to live? Please fist'at least 5 thhigs yorr think f 4e Hugo great. (Strergfirs can refer to dWdonxrxnky,the,people,P(bk facvt,. natural resources,character,govemance,ek.)- QArt s��-i %A,t— . What are Hugo's weaknesses? Where does Hugo W short from your perspective? What are the greatest opportunities in the corn wwty? What things do we do well already,but could do better? What areas do we fair short in that we could be better at?Where are the greatest opportunities for the commk"? --- What things stand in the way of achieving the opporkw ties or m*t**)g Carr strengths? What threatens the corn mnity or city from achievirig their goals? Vision Hugo 2030 Objective: To define a vision for this process. What do you want Hugo to look like in the future? If you were to leave Hugo and come back in 20 years what would you see? What does the landscape look like? What types of land uses would you see? Are there specific elements in the community today that would remain into the future? What do neighborhoods look bke? Were is awrimercial development? What is Hugo known W. LVvd TSO S - L%-yA LE S N•v-z-c,Z.-��L L�r� � r -TcF -__ ` �d Qh L �: --'ti t iJ wilt z Are there any changes you would like the City to make for your property? Yes D No If you answered,yes,please describe spec&*the changes you would Ince to see for your property(This may be a change in land use designation,preservation of a sgrwficant natural resource,etc.). Please provide your contact nbrmabon below,so that we can contact you if we have any questions about your comments: Name: �� : �t�. t-+o �--e t•�r . -�.�t P ,,4►;t�. Property Address: 17L"i ' TOa"t AV1E- PIN - Mailing Address(d different from mawing address). Email: �. �'4 t,A...CNA- ...�►t�. . C - Would you like to be added to the email fist to receive updates on the 2008 Hugo Comprethensive Plan? Yes*— No O Please complete this form and leave at the front desk before you leave tonight. If you are unable to complete the form at the open,please submit the completed form no later than Tuesday,March 6,2007 to: Hugo City Hall,14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North,Hugo, MN 55038(fax: 651- 426-2859 or email mtindau&.hugo.mn.us). City of Hugo I OEM 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Open House#1 February 26,2007 SWOT(Strengths,Weaknesses,Opportunities,Threats) Objective:To identify strengths, weaknesses,opportunities and threats in Hugo. What are Hugo's greatest strengths? What makes the City a great piaoe to 1*7 Please W al 1eas15 things you think make Hugo great. (Slrengtls can refer to ft comm ur*,dw people,pLtk facAbn natural resource ,charader,governance,etc.) What are Hugo's weaknesses? Hugo fal short from Your p ectw? rl What are the greatest opportunities in the conwnur*? What things do we do wel already,but could do better? What areas do we fall short in that we could be better at?Where are the greatest opportunities for the commurwty. . - - :.a.. What things stand in the way of achie-v--nq the opportunities of mmta nN our strengths? `Alhat threatens the community or city frau achieving their mss? Vision Hugo 2030 Objective: To define a vision for this process. What do you want Hugo to look like in the future? If you were to leave Hugo and come back in 20 years what would you see? What does the landscape look like? What types of land uses would you see? Are there specific elements in the conxrxx dy today that would remain into the future? What do neW bortwds look like? Where is conxnercial development? What is Hugo known W Are there any changes you would tike the City to make for your property? Yes❑ No % 8 yo6 answered,yes.please describe sp�the dmges you would Ike b see for your party Mis may be a charge in tapd use designation,preservation of a significant natural resource,etc.). Please provide your contact iniomiabon below,so 11hat we can contact you 4 we have any questions about your comments: Name: Property Address: G i7 L x- Madding Address(d ddlerent from mailing address)- _ Phone: G! • L$'!•33�1 Email: Would you We to be added to too emarl W to receive updates on the 20(18 Hugo Comprehensive Plan? Yes #-- No ❑ , Please complete this form and leave at the front desk before you leave tonight. If you are unable to complete the form at the open,please submit the cornpieted form no later than Tuesday,March 6, 2007 to: augo City H4,14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North,Hugo,MN 55038(fax: 651 426-2859 or email mlindau0.d.hugo.mn.us). City of Hugo 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update 3: Open House#1 February 26,2007 SWOT(Strengths,Weaknesses,Opportunities,Threats) Objective:To identify strengths,weaknesses,opportunities and threats in Hugo. What are Hugo's greatest strengths? What makes the City a great place to live? Please list at least 5 things you think make Hugo great. (Strengths can refer to the conxnu*,V*people,pudic facritm, natural resources,character,governance,etc.) Som What are Hugo's weaknesses? Where does Hugo bN short from your perspgdive? L Vv� • Dolei What are the greatest opportunities in the conxrAW. What t#orgs do we do well already,but could do better? What areas do we fall start in that we could be better at?Where are the greatest opportunities for the comm What things stand in the way of the a our ? What threaten V n9 Y �9 oPD�� �9 ►s the community or city from achieving their goals? Vision Hugo 2030 Objective: To define a vision for this process. What do you want Hugo to look like in the future? If you were to leave Hugo and come hack in 20 years what would you see? What does the landscape look like? What types of land uses would you see? Are there specific elernents in the community today that would remain into the future? What do neighborhoods look lilce? Where is corrie tial development? What is HL190 known W. w� r - — 41el AA Are there any changes you would We the City to make for your property? Yes ❑ No tf you answered,yes,pie"describe specifically the charges you would like to see for your property(This may be a charge in land use designation,preservation of a significant natural resource,etc.). Please provide your contact information below,so that we can contact you 9 we have any questions about your comments: Name: Sfa.C.cG PropeftyAddress: �3?'i tS �C S�'• IV M: ____--- Mailing Address(if different from mailing address): Phone: (P d Email: S-(RGtG ke-4t V110 Would you hke to be added io the email fist to receive updates on the 2008 Hugo Comprehensive Plan? Yes ,! No ❑ Please complete this form and leave at the front desk before you leave tonight. If you are unable to complete the form at the open,please submit the completed form no later than Tuesday,March 6, 2007 to: Hugo City Hall, 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North,Hugo, MN 55038(fax: 651- 426-2859 or email mlindau(cD_ -hugo.mn.us). City of Hugo 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Open House#1 February 26, 2007 SWOT (Strengths,Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) Objective: To identify strengths, weaknesses,opportunities and threats in Hugo. What are Hugo's greatest strengths? What makes the Cdy a great place io rive? Please fist at feast 5 dwxjs you think make Hugo great (Strengitu can refer to the cormtx tl,the people,public fac[bes, natural resources,dQracter. governance,etc.) L_— ----- -- — What are Hugo's weaknesses? Where does Hugo tap shat from your Perspective? r � I4 �K. What are the greatest opportunities in the community? What things do we do well already,but could do vette(? What areas do we fall short in that we could be better at?Where are the greatest opportunities for the community? f What things stand in the way of achieving the opportunities or maintaining our strengths? What threatens the community or city frau achieving their goals? . ......_. .... Vision Hugo 2030 Objective: To define a vision for this process. What do you want Hugo to look like In the future? If you were to leave Hugo and come back in 20 years what would you see? What does the landscape look like? What types of land uses would you see? Are there specific elements in the cormmuNty today that would remain into the future? What do neighborhoods look like? Where is commercial development? What is Hugo known W. Are there any changes you would like the City to make for your property? Yes❑ No ❑ It you answered,yes,please describe specifically the dianges you would like to see for your property(This may be a change in land use designation,preservation of a significant natural resource,etc.). Please provide your contact information below,so that we can contact you if we have any questions about your comments: Name: Property Address: Mailinc Address(if different from madkig address): Phone: _-- - — - ------ - --- — _�_— Email: Would you like to be added to the email list b receive updates on the 2008 Hugo Comprehensive Plan? Yes❑ No ❑ Please complete Phis form and leave at the front desk before you leave tonight- If you are unable to complete the form at the open,please submit the completed form no later than Tuesday,March 6, 2007 to: Hugo City Hal1,14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North,Hugo, MN 55038(fax: 651- 426-2859 or email mlindaLkUDci.hugo.mn.us). City of Hugo 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update _ ;, Open House#1 l . February 26, 2007 SWOT(Strengths,Weaknesses,Opportunities, Threats) Objective: To identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in Hugo. What are Hugo's greatest strengths? What makes the City a great place to five? Please fist at learnt 5 things you think make Hugo great. (Strengths can refer to the corrxnu*,the people,public fachbes, natured resumes,character,=70 k.) c e, as: 5; What are Hugo's weaknesses? Where does short from your What are the greatest opportunities in the community?. What#*)gs do we do well already,but could do better? What areas do we tap short in that we could be better at?Where are the greatest oppodw4lies for the commrxiity? -- _ s s 01(- e - _ What things stand in the way of achieving the opporhinities or maintaining our strengths? What threatens the corrwrur►ity or city from amievirtg tf�ei�goals? Vision Hugo 2030 Objective: To define a vision for this process. What do you want Hugo to took like in the future? Are there any changes you would like the City to make for your property? Yes❑ No ❑ It you answe�,yes,please describe specify-*the changes you would like io see for your property(This may be a change in land use designation,preservalion of a significant natural resoxce,etc.). Please provide your corNact information below,so that we can contact you 4 we have any questions about your cormnents: dame Property Address: Mailing Address(if different from mailing address): Phone: Email: Would you like to be added to the email list to receive updates on the 2008 Hugo Comprehensive Plan? Yes ❑ No ❑ Please complete this form and leave at the front desk before you leave tonight. If you are unable to complete the form at the open,please submit the completed form no later than Tuesday,March 6, 2007 to: Hugo City Hal,14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North,Hugo,MN 55038(fax: 651- 426-2859 or email mlindaugk i6hugo_mmus)_ City of Hugo 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Open House#l1 February 26,2007 SWOT(Strengths,Weaknesses,Opportunities,Threats) Objective:To identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and dveats in Hugo. What are Hugo's greatest strengths? What makes the City a great place to kve? Please W at least 5 things you think make Hugo great. (Sbengft can rekr to the c& mxo*,ft peq*,pubic facriiities, natural resources, I racer,governance,ok) ll - i in What are Hugo's weaknesses? does Hugo W short from you perspeciive? 59eW.-S I%k% I. ��.,�ce J a6! afed -�,6vf ►s I4ke b JfS►o�C'� nt r e�Q q p�pl ki►�a ate► lra�o 6J What are the greatest opportunities in the corrxrMxrity? What things do we do wel aiready,but could do better? What areas do we W short m that we could be getter at?Where are the greatest opportunities lor the corrxrKrrty? D � 44ud- t u 6v r-bAn f xwo s 6e de-+r 1'$1e-�1A -1b w91U a "-t Q What things stand in the way of acbreving the maintaining our maintainour strengths? What tha ears the ommursty or city from actreving their goals? CJU tt �ex, V V � IK&W . �'vrail)ft`i+-.^�f't. j�I�,-=t. -'" .:r'-v Z..{' �z." P `"`..%{`�� �iF`'�H,j"UGL� i�i}'� ��%AttJ�E?. `•'�-L.t.:t..�-1.a>�, t 3 Vision Hugo 2030 Objective: To define a vision for this process. What do you want Hugo to look like in the future? If you were to leave Hugo and come back in 20 years what would you see? What does the landscape look We? What types of land uses would you see? Are there specific elements in the cornrrKmi4y today that would remain into the future? What do neighborhoods look lice? Where is commiefc"development? What is Hugo known for? ac'k C' ��_a (-M44% Liee.0'bf-F",A --St.Q1 r-SS �riD(lctr[�S�t _Z'j�1_ t '�c eSer n{i ar. of c-k A'% o, [w 5r eac cr wr ov,ee,�lt,Drsa2 SeaSiM l Are tt>ere any changes you would like the City lomake for your property? Yes❑ No IFY 9 you answered,yes,please describe specifically the changes you would like to see for your property(This may be a change in land use designation,preservation of a sgn&ant natural resource,efc.). Please provide your contact information below,so that we can contact you 9 we have any questions about your Comments: Nam: Property Address Mailing Address(if different from mailing address) Phone: Would you like to be added to the email list to receive updates on the 2008 Hugo Comprehensive Plan? No ❑ Please complete this form and leave at the front desk before you leave tonight. If you are unable to complete the form at the open,please submit the completed form no later than Tuesday,March 6, 2007 to: Hugo City Hall, 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North,Hugo,MN 55038(fax: 651- 426-2859 or email mlindaufb_ci.hwgo.mn.us). 2008 Comp Plan SWOT Page 1 of 2 Kendra Lindahl From: Michele Lindau [mlindau@ci.hugo.mn.us] Sent: Monday, March 05, 2007 4:20 PM To: Bryan Bear; Kendra Lindahl; Rachel Subject: 2008 Comp Plan SWOT Here is a response to our on-line comment form. C1 and C2 is in answer to the first yes/no question respectively. C3 and C4 to the second yes/no question. In other words,in the email below,the box was checked for "no" on the first question and "yes" on the second. The other questions are numbered. Hope this is not too confusing but it is the way the results of the form are presented. Michele Cl: C2: ON Tl: Thomas E. Raster T2: 15227 Greene Avenue,Hugo, MN 55038 T3: T4: 651-426-3050 T5:iraster@mindspring.com C3: ON C4: Remote Name: 209.180.29.32 Remote User: Date: 03/04/2007 Time: 12:43 PM 1. Hugo's main strength (and what used to be the primary attraction for prospective newcomers)was its rural character—opportunities to own a horse, to hobby farm, to hunt on your own land,to get away from the typical subdivision's quarter-acre lots and accompanying frustrations with neighbors. Unfortunately, this"strength" is fading with city hall's current development-oriented policies. 2 The greatest weakness(and threat to the above strength) is 20f years of city officials failing to honor and preserve Hugo's rural lifestyle. Instead,city officials have catered to developers and parroted the mantra that"development pays for itself and,therefore, longtime residents won't see development- related tax increases."The reality is that snowballing development causes a community to chase its own tail: The city expands infrastructure for anticipated development and then needs to attract more development to pay for the infrastructure. 3 It's critical for city officials to regain control over Hugo's future and to salvage some of its rural heritage. To a degree,officials do that when they insist that development(at least in the near-term) first take place west of the Highway 61 corridor. 4 3/5/2007 2008 Comp Plan SWOT Page 2 of 2 Continuing the thought from the "Opportunities discussion": There are growing pressures for development east of the Highway 61 corridor. Can city officials resist pressures from some landowners for premature expansion of the MUSA?Can city officials regain the trust of Hugo's voters after recent instances where the mayor and council adopted an attitude of"We know better than you what's good for you" and resorted to backdoor methods to build a new fire station and city hall? 5 We would like to see Hugo's rural character preserved in the majority of the city east of the Highway 61 corridor by sticking with 5-or 10-acre minimums for areas east of the Highway 61 corridor. Limit future commercial development and quarter-acre lot residential developments to the area west of the Highway 61 corridor. 6 No! We definitely prefer being left alone. However,we would be interested in learning about programs that compensate landowners for preserving rural land,particularly when that parcel includes lakeshore as ours does. Over the years,we've planted over 4,500 trees on our 7+ acres ... and our property has become a sanctuary for wildlife displaced by development west of Greene Avenue. We'd be sick if to be forced to sell out and then have a developer destroy the character of our property. In our specific case, can city officials resist pressures from the landowner to our east for premature expansion of the MUSA, particularly when that expansion would envelope properties whose owners don't want to subdivide but might be forced to do so should their property taxes balloon to reflect the extension of city water and sewer services through their properties ... or who might be forced to hook up to city water and sewer. 3/5/2007 1puo o , City of Hugo _ 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Open House#1 � February 26, 2007 ` SWOT(Strengths,Weaknesses, Opportunities,Threats) Objective:To identify strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats in Hugo. What are Hugo's greatest strengths? What makes the City a great place to live? Please list at least 5 things you think make Hugo great. (Strengths can refer to the community, the people,public facildies, natural resources,character,governance,etc.) What are Hugo's weaknesses? Wkere does Hugo fall short from your perspective? L. k_ icenK e 10 — u_l+_ J+a r'�o What are the greatest opportunities in the community? What things do we do well already,but could do better?,What areas do we fall short in that we could be better at?Where are the greatest opportunities for ! the community? K — - ---u—`u 1. -; -- - ro — 66 ��o�� yy a What things stand in the way of ach' ing the opportunities or mainoning our strengths? What threatens the community or city from achieving their goals? Vision Hugo 2030 Objective: To define a vision for this process. What do you want Hugo to look like in the future? If you were to leave Hugo and come back in 20 years what would you see? What does the landscape look like? What types of land uses would you see? Are there specific elements in the community today that would remain into the future? What do neighborhoods look like? Where is commercial development? What is Hugo known for? r - ---- --- -ems - --. 7G - A-cKeS Are there any changes you would like the City to make for your property? Yes ❑ No If you answered,yes,please describe specifically the changes you would like to see for your property(This may be a change in land use designation,preservation of a significant natural resource,etc.). Please provide your contact information below,so that we can contact you 9 we have any questions about your comments: r Name: Property Address: cV t' b lJ r Mailing Address(if different fro mdress): Phone: ! - < S73 ) Email: G> GC ► S f jV \ICA 0 rr5 N GU`✓1 Would you like to be added to the email list to receive uaates on the 2008 Hugo Comprehensive Plan? Yes^ No ❑ Please complete this form and leave at the front desk before you leave tonight. If you are unable to complete the form at the open,please submit the completed form no later than Tuesday,March 6, 2007 to: Hugo City Hall, 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North,Hugo, MN 55038(fax: 651- 426-2859 or email mlindau(@ci.hugo.mn.us). City of Hugo 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Open House#1 February 26,2007 0 SWOT(Strengths,Weaknesses,Opportunities,Threats) Objective:To identify strengths,weaknesses, opportunities and threats in Hugo. } What are Hugds greatest strengths? What makes the City a great place to live? Please list at least 5 things you think make Hugo great. (Strengths can refer to the community,the people,public facilities, natural resources,character,governance,etc.) -- - - - ---------- What - ----What are Hugo's weaknesses? Where does Hugo fall short from your perspective? What are the greatest opportunities in the community? What things do we do well already,but could do better? What areas do we fall short in that we could be better at?Where are the greatest opportunities for the community? J ------------------ GD -- �� C6c -------- What things stand in the way of achieving the opportunities or maintaining our strengths? What threatens the community or city from achieving their goals? Vision Hugo 2030 Objective. To define a vision for this process. What do you want Hugo to look like in the future? If you were to leave Hugo and come back in 20 years what would you see? What does the landscape look like? What types of land uses would you see? Are there specific elements in the community today that would remain into the future? What do neighborhoods look like? Where is commercial development? What is Hugo known for? --- --- - - - -- ---- - - — ........ Are there any changes you would like the City to make for your property? Yes O NO/I If you answered,yes,please describe specifically the changes you would like to see for your property(This may be a change in land use designation,preservation of a significant natural resource,etc.). Please provide your contact information below,so that we can contact you if we have any questions about your comments: , Name: f� N jr / A t_ Property Address: '4 r) 0 � !�kC�A,-. Mailing Address(if different from mailing address): Phone ( S/ S� 7 Email: Would you like to be added to the email list to receive updates on the 2008 Hugo Comprehensive Plan? Yes O No ❑ Please complete this form and leave at the front desk before you leave tonight. If you are unable to complete the form at the open,please submit the completed form no later than Tuesday, March 6, 2007 to: Hugo City Hall, 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North, Hugo, MN 55038(fax: 651- 426-2859 or email mlindaupd.hugo.mmus). City of Hugo . 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Open House 41 _. February 26,2007 SWOT(Strengths,Weaknesses,Opportunities,Threats) Objective:To identify strengths,weaknesses, opportunities and threats in Hugo. What are Hugo's greatest strengths? What makes the City a great place to five? Please list at least 5 things you think make Hugo great. (Strengths can refer to the community,the people,public facilities, natural resources,character,govemance,etc.) ' - Q ._ XS'�_. r�s_ a_� 6vo c/ �0/4{e a�U2 /LL In What are Hugds weaknesses?? Where does Hugo fall short from your perspective? --L�oLcz_ —L22ccL �� a 01n hn0,J.e3 --._.._Aca.r�a:i:--!'oc�ct�s__ot__!:x►n a GI---P�r__k-: -is--��+_-rtX �cz_c_ �'r� What are the greatest opportunities in the community? What things do we do well already,but could do better? What areas do we fall short in that we could be better at?Where are the greatest opportunities for the Commu Ry? a lakes, iia./s : �iZcl Cry.Giotd�i-qc� cvi/d%Ve— - What things stand in the way of achieving the opportunities or maintaining our strengths? What threatens the community or city from achieving their goals? cam=-Lw- 2cz' Za"e d z5,--ZExv .g i. Vision Hugo 2030 Objective: To define a vision for this process. What do you want Hugo to look like in the future? If you were to leave Hugo and come back in 20 years what would you see? What does the landscape look like? What types of land uses would you see? Are there specific elements in the community today that would remain into the future? What do neighborhoods look like? Where is commercial development? What is Hugo known for? ---��� •S___c��lJ-LC 1G�--�.e---�f_1�._-�LLd.P1_--C(,GL.a�---,�U_��---'SCI----.._.__.. Are there any changes you would like the City to make for your property? Yes El No x If you answered,yes,please describe spe6ff"y the changes you would like to see for your property(This may be a change in land use designation,preservation of a significant natural resource,etc.). Please provide your contact information below,so that we can contact you if we have any questions about your comments- Name: 11�4 17k, Property Address: i.S`1 Aye /U- -- -- - /� Id &A -,err�3 --- --- --- --- Mailing Address(if differed-from mailing address): Phone: Email _ f'Gl y lVLCLr:5 Q 06M c., f . f1 I _ Would you Ike to be added to the email fist to receive updates on the 2008 Hugo Comprehensive Plan? YesX No 11 Please complete this form and leave at the front desk before you leave tonight. If you are unable to complete the form at the open,please submit the completed form no later than Tuesday,March 6, 2007 to: Hugo City Hall, 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North,Hugo,MN 55038(fax. 651- 426-2859 or email mlindau ci.hugo.mn.us). City of Hugo 2008 Comprehensive Plan Update Open House#1 4 ; February 26,2007 SWOT(Strengths,Weaknesses,Opportunities,Threats) Objective:To identify strengths,weaknesses,opportunities and threats in Hugo. What are Hugo's greatest strengths? What makes the City a great place to live? Please list at least 5 things you think make Hugo great. (Strengths can refer to the community, the people,public facilities, natural resources,character,Bove ance, etc.) }2vr.t� L..iFc -- 77f� S L�Fb S�xib 15 E:�obinlb i.J (>c 95�1-CLV-%E.d4 SS jJ- L�+I�E> What are Hugo's weaknesses? Where does Hugo fall short from your perspective? 1 ---�il�'EJC-t T �vJ £�t�vS d.MLD.0 fa�ERT IL' . What are the greatest opportunities in the community? What things do we do well already,but could do better? What areas do we fall short in that we could be better at?Where are the greatest opportunities for the community? What things stand in the way of achieving the opportunities or maintaining our strengths? What threatens the community or city from achieving their goals? Vision Hugo 2030 Objective: To derrne a vision for this process. What do you want Hugo to took like in the future? If you were to leave Hugo and come back in 20 years what would you see? What does the landscape look like? What types of land uses would you see? Are there specific elements in the community today that would remain into the future? What do neighborhoods look like? Where is commercial development? What is Hugo known for? 1 �`J v✓Eo✓%d 7v bo 23 �/eit>< s f�[sv t c4 Cvl.r cn"'r /�t. jr- S E E Nr S Z-4,C 746 E QLS i - ,q,.z Ctrl ',� �E��i,t c.✓�Mo '�� TD !�•lJd T��� !`3 p,ei(„-,�L L �.ac-�,e_ s)�c�1 I/v W n i . 7b S SIV l + -C'" LE>� `vr ; �ES Y L Are there any changes you would like the City to make for your property? Yes❑ No V1 If you answered,yes,please describe specifically the changes you would like to see for your property(This may be a change in land use desgnation,preservation of a significant natural resource,etc.). we i�G n/t- v✓ i J" rv.�t7�1 �( p6•/� P.2 f'E�,-Z --ri, ttvc� ✓��✓v�sE ,r S �e`E''?'b X._ "T�.r-£� t_AGe 7�i e�E.t• �E.S. i1 E•�'3 S e t,� F'��L�f� E S i� }��✓c�PPE�S c— L6'1✓o �cYly= q✓S c;G / riic- /i Lct'T_ ti/• L!� i,i v1Ci, C.oiti lS 6H Z� c'V�>r �e��I-VAim .v! �S N� !N EcPc6 oR/�. rn "7 �/o✓i7� is Please provide your contact information below,so that we can contact you if we have any questions about your comments: Name: Property Address: t'3 3 S G .vt Gs2 G ST ,q V rJ w e"o -- ---- -----__ ._.----------- ----Mailing Address Address(if different from we#ing address): !33 5 E l-�cue E S-r- +J;= Phone: Cosi - 42-q Email: e l e q a pe-0 p le Cc- e r►Vt Would you like to be added to the email list to receive updates on the 2008 Hugo Comprehensive Plan? Yes, No O Please complete this form and leave at the front desk before you leave tonight. If you are unable to complete the form at the open,please submit the completed form no later than Tuesday,March 6, 2007 to: Hugo City Hall, 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North,Hugo, MN 55038(fax: 651- 426-2859 or email mlindau(a.ci.hugo.mn.us). Hugo Comprehensive Plan Update Project Preliminary Project Schedule and Budget 2007 2008 .Ian. Feb. March April May June July Aug. Sept. Oct. Nov. Dec. Jan, Feb. March April March April May J— Project an ement and Communication �t T P7_ epave rolecl pprova Schedule and Outline -•► Kickoff Meeting with City Staff and Consultants Monthly Status Meetings with City Staff and Consultants 12 Coordinate with Met Council District Member and Sector Representative Review of Prevlous Work/Inventor /Assessment Review Exlstin Co Plan Components,Ci Documents and System Statements - Assemble Balk round Information —Identify and Interview ley Elected and Appointed Officlals and Stakeholders Public Engagement and Review Process t4jtia4 2;? 11 Prepare Presentation Materials and Graphics for meetings ► i i -•r i Meetings with the Parks Commission on Second Wednesday of the Month 2 Meeting with the Planning Commission on Second Thursday of the Month(up to e Meetings with the City Council on Third Monday of the Month(up to 8 Special Joint Planning Commission,Parks Commission and Chy Council Meeting 1 Prepare Displays,Materials,Surveys and Meeting Summaries for Forums Community Forums with the Public 8 Develop Comprehensive Plan Components 11 Prepare Comp Plan Outline based on approve; Ian or ani2ation ...........i Prepare Text Updates to the following Components of the Gorrip Plan •-•- ................. -•- •-•- •-•-• -•- •-• -•- ........ -•-•► Land Use Guide Plan Component Parks,Trails and O n Space Plan Component Intro,Background,Policies and Objectives and Inplementation Components Housing,Economic Development anal Components Review and Assist in Final Edit of Comp Plan Components prepared by WSB -•-• •-•- -... •- .-•- •-• .... Transportation Plan Component Surface Water Management Plan Component Wastewater Plan Component Water Supply Plan Component Draft and Compile Comp Plan Components •-• .....fill, One Comprehensive Revision based on Comments from the City and the Public .......1. Minor Modifications prior to Approval by the City Council for Distribution ► Anara{provar Minor Modifications based on Comments from ad•Jurisdictions and the Met Council i Work Product. 1 Unbound Ori final Reproducible Copy of the Final Comp Plan D' Hal Version of Draft and Final Comp Plan Landform 2007-01-09(Anal)Hugo camp Plan Project Schedule.%LS