HomeMy WebLinkAbout2008.03.17 EDA Packet AGENDA
CITY OF HUGO
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MONDAY, MARCH 17, 2008 - 8:30 AM
8:30 am 1. Call to Order
8:31 am 2. Roll Call
8:32 am 3. Approval of Minutes
EDA Meeting of February 19, 2007
8:35 am 4. Discussion on Frenchman Centre Redevelopment
Project Site Plan and TIF Application.
• Dale Dockendorf and Bill Lentsch
9:35 am 5. Update on Downtown Redevelopment
9:50 am 6. Update on 2008 Comprehensive Plan
10:10 am 7. Update on 2008 Hugo Kidz n' Biz Fest—April 6th
10:30 am 8. Adjournment
BACKGROUND MEMO FOR THE EDA MEETING OF
MONDAY, MARCH 17, 2008
3. Approval of Minutes for EDA meeting of February 19, 2008
City staff recommends that the EDA approve the minutes for the February 19, 2008 EDA
meeting as presented.
4. Discussion on Frenchman Centre Redevelopment Project Site Plan and TIF
Application
Staff has received a site plan application for the redevelopment of the "End Zone"
property. The plan includes a 23,000 square foot retail building with 12 units to be leased.
The EDA was presented with the concept plan for this project at their October meeting,
and provided comments to the developer. The redevelopment site plan is basically the
same from when the EDA saw it in October. Some details that have changed on the plan
are: the drive through has been removed, the plaza area in front is a little smaller, and the
developer now has elevations for the EDA to review. The developer has also applied for
Tax Increment Financing for the redevelopment project.
Staff will give a short presentation on the project and TIF application. Staff recommends
that the EDA provide the developer with informal comments on the project and TIF
request.
5. Update on Downtown Redevelopment
Staff will update the EDA on the progress with downtown redevelopment projects.
6. Update on 2008 Comprehensive Plan
Staff will update the EDA on the 2008 Comprehensive Plan.
7. Update on 2008 Hugo Kidz n' Biz Fest—April 6th
On April 6th, 2008, the 4th annual Kidz `n Biz Fest will take place at the Oneka
Elementary School. Staff will update the EDA on the progress of events that will occur at
Kids n' Biz Fest.
MINUTES FOR THE EDA MEETING OF FEBRUARY 19, 2008
EDA President Fran Miron called the meeting to order at 8:30 am.
PRESENT: Jan Arcand, Jim B er, Tom Denaway, Mike nger, Phil Klein, Brian Thistle,
and Fran Miron
ABSENT: None
CITY STAFF PRESENT: City Administrator Mike Ericson, CD Director Bryan Bear,
Associate Planner Rachel Simone
APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR THE EDA MEETING OF JANUARY 22, 2008
Denaway made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the minutes for the EDA meeting of January 22,
2008.
All aye. Motion carried.
DISCUSSION AND APPROVAL OF THE 2008 EDA GOALS
The EDA discussed the 2008 EDA goals and the 2008 City Council goals.
Denaway made a motion, Granger seconded,to approve the 2008 EDA goals.
DISCUSSION ON BUSINESS RETENTION AND EXPANSION COMMITTEE
At the January meeting the EDA was presented with a business retention and expansion
program from the U of M extension services. The EDA outlined in their 2008 goal that a
business retention and expansion subcommittee should be formed to work on retention and
expansion of business in Hugo. The EDA discussed forming a subcommittee.
Jan Arcand, Jim Bever, and Brian Thistle volunteered to be on the BR&E subcommittee.
Miron made a motion, seconded by Granger,to accept Jan Arcand, Jim Bever, and Brian
Thistle as subcommittee members, Jim Bever being the chair of the committee, and to
advertise in the City newsletter for volunteers to join the subcommittee.
All aye. Motion Carried
DISCUSSION ON HUGO KIDZ N' BIZ FEST DONATION
On April 6th, 2008,the 4th annual Kidz `n Biz Fest will take place at the Oneka Elementary
School. This annual event is an opportunity for the Hugo Business Association and the Hugo
EDA to directly connect with Hugo families and children in a PTA carnival atmosphere.
This event is expected to attract more than 400 Hugo children and their families, and will
once again feature an assortment of carnival games presented by Hugo businesses with
assistance from the WBL High School and National Honor Society. Last year the EDA and
the Hugo Business Association(HBA) co-sponsored the event in the amount of$500. Staff
recommended that the EDA make a recommendation to the City Council that the EDA co-
sponsor with the HBA for Hugo Kidz `n Biz Fest.
Denaway made a motion, Granger seconded, to recommend to the City Council to continue
to make a donation of$500.00 to Hugo Kidz n' Biz Fest.
All aye. Motion carried.
UPDATE ON DOWNTOWN REDEVELOPMENT
Staff updated the EDA on the progress of the downtown redevelopment in Hugo.
CD Director stated that the "End Zone" site developers have submitted a site plan
application. The project includes a 21,000 square foot retail building. The TIF application
will be submitted in March 2008.
Granger stated that since we are getting an application the EDA should talk about the
certification of the TIF district.
SITE VISIT TO INDUSTRIAL PAINTING SPECIALISTS
Industrial Painting Specialists was founded in 1992. They have a state-of-the-art 40,000-
square-foot facility located at 5858 152nd Street in Hugo. They apply all wet-coatings
systems using airless and conventional spray equipment. Their lifting equipment includes
three, 10-ton overhead bridge cranes. They have done painting for Caterpillar, 3M, Par
Nuclear, Boeing and even painted the 1996 Olympic Tower in their shop.
The EDA was given a tour of Industrial Painting hosted by Gary Papermaster, Vice President
of the company.
ADJOURNMENT
Denaway made motion, Klein seconded to adjourn the meeting at 11:00 am
All aye. Motion carried.
Frenchman Centre Site Plan
EDA Meeting - 23,000 sq ft Retail Building
- Plaza area
March II : - 12 units
- In the TIF District
I City of •o
...�_.�
lt
4,1
s�
� ��_.._g i�:r:�iuwi<? ii�i:iiitiiiiiill
�...-■■-- ■ori �����
���� � � OI11�1 »'I'll 111!1 E5'�11 1111 :�• " ::'�
TIF Application Request
• Pay-as-you-go(not an upfronttndingf
source)
—The City has set the policy to avoid risk.
• The total construction cost is assessed at:
$3.7 million
• They are asking fol 320,000 over 25 years
@ 6%=$46,839 per year.For a total of 1.1
million.
TIF Application Request EDA Discussion Topics
• Tax Increment is Requested for: • It is important to redevelop the site? i h CJLS,,
ho
—Building demolition—$61,490 ` IIsrthis
p the
-rththf�`pr�the� property?
IN
—Public Improvement(utilities,curb,and gutter) • >Shoitld ht e EDA provi2le ncen tve.
-$90,000
—Site Improvements—$169,010 Should the EDA proceed urther with
certification?
T l p( A �� i4Shs
1 d
p,�
�`
oz V, A7
r �
� ��,V' Com✓�,` �tr �, ��6
S 'CO2
UV
•�i� y\i�\L�� � rl�� w! jaw^` .R �\r-`� \ �'t y 1 �.`\t\�)i ���
41 t{►�11� �) ��■
_ iS�\_ �� ��� ♦ y��l. Kms. ;�. .:� I _ -- �\ L �' ,I�I��
�Ir
LM
1
it
I �
City of Hugo, Minnesota
APPLICATION FOR TAX INCREMENT
A. APPLICANT INFORMATION
Name of Corporation/Partnership Development Partners Hugo LLC
Address 2734 County Rd. D East,White Bear Lake,MN 55110
Primary Contact William M. Lentsch
Address 2734 County Rd.D East,White Bear Lake,MN 55110
Phone 651-748-8888 Fax 651-379-5089 Email blentsch(a)citiesrealestate.com
On a separate sheet,please provide the following:
• Brief description of the corporation/partnership's business, including history,principal product or
service,etc. Attach as Exhibit A.
• Brief description of the proposed project. Attach as Exhibit B.
• List names of officers and shareholders/partners with more than five percent(5%) interest in the
corporation/partnership. Attach as Exhibit C.
• A but-for analysis. Attach as Exhibit D.
Attorney Name Sherrill R. Oman(a7 Fredrikson&Byron, P.A.
Address 200 South Sixth Street, Suite 4000,Minneapolis, MN 55402
Phone 612-492-7131 Fax 612-492-7077 Email soman ,fredlaw.com
Accountant Name
Address
Phone Fax Email
Contractor Name James Steele Construction
Address 1410 Sylvan St., St. Paul,MN 55117
Phone 651-488-6755 Fax 651-488-4787 Email isc@jsteeleconstruction.com
Engineer Name
Address
Phone Fax Email
Architect Name Caulfield Architectural Design
Address 9388 Erin Court,Woodbury,MN 55129
Phone 651-769-6865 Fax 651-459-1358 Email brucecaulfield@msn.com
B. PROJECT INFORMATION
The project will be:
❑ Industrial Greenfield: X New Construction ❑ Expansion
X Commercial Redevelopment: ❑ New Construction ❑ Rehabilitation
❑ Industrial Redevelopment: ❑ New Construction ❑ Rehabilitation
❑ Housing Redevelopment: ❑ New Construction ❑ Rehabilitation
❑ Mixed Use Redevelopment: ❑ New Construction ❑ Rehabilitation
❑ Other
Please explain the basic components of the project proposed,i.e., amount of new commercial square
footage,numbers of housing units(rental or owner occupied), etc.
The proposed retail building will consist of approximately 23,000 S/F of space with a variety of
suite sizes to fit the future tenants needs.
- 1 -
City of Hugo, Minnesota
The project will be: ❑ Owner Occupied X Leased Space
If leased space,please attach a list of names and addresses of future lessees and indicate the status of
commitments or lease agreements. Attach as Exhibit E. N/A at this time
Project Address 13891 Forest Boulevard North,Hugo,MN 55038
Legal Description See attached Exhibit F
Site Plan Attached: X Yes ❑ No
Amount of Tax Increment Requested for:
Building Demolition $ 61,490.00
Environmental Remediation $
Public Improvements $ 90,000.00(utilities, curb and putter)
Site Improvements $ 169,010.00
Land Acquisition $
(Land Acquisition shall not exceed 50%of total subsidy request)
Total Subsidy Requested $ 320,500.00 over 25 years Q 6%_$46,839/year
Current Assessed Value on Project Site: $ 541,600.00
Current Real Estate Taxes on Project Site: $ 12,340.00
City $ 4,305.80
County $ 3,198.90
School District $ 510.38
Estimated Assessed Value upon Completion: $ 3,700,000.00
Phase I $
Phase II $
Estimated Real Estate Taxes upon Completion:
Phase I $ 73,250.00
Phase II $ N/A
Construction Start Date: 6-1-08
Construction Completion Date: 12-01-08
If Phased Project: N/A Year %Construction Completed
N/A Year %Construction Completed
C. PUBLIC PURPOSE
It is the policy of the City of Hugo that the use of Tax Increment Financing should result in a benefit to the
public. Please indicate how this project will serve a public purpose.
X Job Creation: Number of existing jobs 0
Number of jobs created by project 96
X Increase in Tax Base
- 2 -
City of Hugo, Minnesota
X Enhancement or diversification of the city's economic base.
❑ New industrial development which will result in additional private investment in the area.
X The project contributes to the fulfillment of the City's development or redevelopment objectives.
X Removal of blight or the rehabilitation of a high profile or priority downtown site.
❑ Other:
D. SOURCES&USES
SOURCES NAME AMOUNT
Bank Loan Unknown $ 3,400,000—80%of cost
Other Private Funds $
Equity $ 828,490
Fed Grant/Loan $
State Grant/Loan $
Other Loans $
ID Bonds $
Tax Increment $ 320,500***
TOTAL $
**Note: Tax Increment is not an upfront funding source as it will be provided only on a pay-as-you-
go basis. Developer needs to identify funding sources to cover ALL costs up front,absent Tax
Increment. ***This will be used either to improve ROI to the Investors or to reduce up-front equity
USES See Attached Exhibit G AMOUNT
Land Acquisition $
Site Development $
Construction $
Machinery&Equipment $
Architectural&Engineering Fees $
Legal Fees $
Interest During Construction $
Debt Service Reserve $
Contingencies $
TOTAL $
E. ADDITIONAL DOCUMENTATION
Applicants will also be required to provide the following documentation.
❑ A) Written business plan, including a description of the business,ownership/management, date
established,products and services,and future plans
❑ B) Financial Statements for Past Two Years
Profit&Loss Statement
Balance Sheet N/A—new entity
❑ C) Current Financial Statements
Profit&Loss Statement to Date
- 3 -
Cily of'H tgo. Minnesota
Balance Sheet to Date N/A—new entity
❑ D) Two Year Financial Projections To Come
❑ F) Personal Financial Statements of all Major Shareholders
Profit&Loss
Current Tax Return To Come
❑ G) Letter of Commitment from Applicant Pledging to Complete During the Proposed Project
Duration To Come
❑ H) Letter of Commitment from the Other Sources of Financing,Stating Terms and Conditions
of their Participation in Project To Come
X I) Non refundable application fee of$2,500
X J) Check for$10,000 to be placed in escrow to be used by the City to complete analysis of the
subsidy requested,and to pay costs associated with Attorney's fees for the TIF Agreement
(unused portion to be refunded)
The undersigned certifies that all information provided in this application is true and correct to the best of
the undersigned's knowledge. The undersigned authorizes the City of Hugo to check credit references and
verify financial and other information. The undersigned also agrees to provide any additional information
as may be requested by the City after the filing of this application.
Applicant Name Development Partners Hugo LLC Date March 6,2008
Bv
IF
Its Managing Member
-4 -
City of Hugo, Minnesota
TAX INCREMENT FINANCING PROPOSAL REVIEW WORKSHEET
Redevelopment Districts
1. The project meets the criteria set forth in Section III of the City's Tax Increment Financing
policy.
X a) Meets minimum thresholds for size,value,and tax capacity.
X b) Meets at least one of the objectives in Section III and satisfies the provision set forth in
Section IV.
X c) Demonstrates need for TIF with the but-for analysis.
X e) Consistent with all city plans and ordinances.
X f) Serves at least two public purpose as defined in Section IV. It serves 5 objectives—some of
the jobs will have livable wage and benefits. All jobs are expected to pay higher than
minimum wage.
2. Ratio of Private to Public Investment in Project: Points:
$3,907,990 Private investment 5:1 5
$_320,500 Public investment 4:1 4
12.19:1 Ratio Private to Public Financing 3:1 3
2:1 2
Less than 2:1 1
3. Structure of Financing: Points:
X < 10%of Subsidy Requested for Land Acq. 5
❑ 11%-20%of Subsidy Requested for Land Acq. 4
❑ 21%-30%of Subsidy Requested for Land Acq. 3
❑ 31%-40%of Subsidy Requested for Land Acq. 2
❑ 41%-50%of Subsidy Requested for Land Acq. 1
4. Type of Project: Points:
❑ 100%Owner Occupied 5
X Mix Owner Occupied&Investment 4
❑ Investment Property 3
5. Use: Points:
X Retail 5
❑ Office/Commercial 5
❑ Mixed-use 5
❑ Housing 3
❑ Industrial 1
6. Type of Development: Points:
X Redevelopment of Substandard Structures 5
0 Development of Vacant Land 3
City ofHuggo. Minnesota
7. Job Creation/Wage Level: Points:
X 15+Full Time Equivalent(FTE)Jobs, $15-$20 per hour 5
X 10-14 FTE's,$10-$14 per hour 4
X 1-9 FTE's,$749 per hour 3
Employees Managers Hourly Wages
Coffee Shop _ ._6 __ ..�.._ _......_1—$7.00-$16.00
..__
Restaurant Franchise 6 2 $7.00416.00
=777-
Florist/Gift Shop 4 J= 1 $6.50-$13.00
..... .....
Media Retailer 8 2 1 $6.50416.00
- -----
Beauty Salon 10 2 11 V6.00440.00
Cell Phone Retailer 6 2 $10.00-$18.00 f
Sporting Goods , 5 j 1 j $8.00-$16.00 f
Accounting Service 8 2 $20.00-$42.00
Financial Service 8 2 ( $20.00-$50.00
Real Estate Service 5 1 $10.00-$25.00
Dry Cleaner 4 1 $6.50-$15.00
Health Service 62 $18.00-$34 00
8. Assessed Value: Points:
X 7+times current 5
❑ 6 times current 4
❑ 5 times current 3
❑ 4 times current 2
❑ 3 times current 1
9. The project will pay annual property taxes in the first fully Points:
assessed year of$73,250
50,000+5
35,000+4
20,000+3
10,000+2
Under 10,000 1
10. Likelihood that the project will result in unsubsidized,spin-off Points:
development.
High 5
Moderate 3
X Low 1
City of Hugo, Minnesota
Sub-Total Points: 40 of a possible 45 points.
11. Bonus Points: Points:
X The project will be 100%Pay-as-you-go TIF 3 points
X The project meets the goals of downtown redevelopment 2 points
Total Points: 45
Overall Project Analysis: 40-48 Points Max Remaining Term
35-39 Points 65-75%of Remaining Term
25-34 Points 40-50%of Remaining Term
15-24 Points 25-30%of Remaining Term
0-14 Points Not Eligible
City of HuQo, Minnesota
EXHIBIT A
The principles of Development Partners, LLC have been involved in numerous projects ranging
from residential to commercial properties. The projects have included but are not limited to
Creekridge View located in White Bear Township. This SFR Development was built in 1993
including 28 executive lots. The SFR development named The Doth Addition was built in 1994
in Shoreview. Mendota Woods located in Mendota Heights was built in 1996 including 14 SFR
lots. Hidden Lake Pointe Townhomes, built in 2004 in White Bear Lake. This development
consists of 14 units including detached floor plans as well as twin homes. The Hidden Lake
Office Park in White Bear Lake was built in 2005. This 8-unit office condo project consists of 3
separate buildings. The ponds of Ramsey, located in Ramsey began in 2001. This development
included 120 Townhome lots and 82 SFR lots. Eagles Landing is located in the Bald Eagle
Industrial Park in Hugo and is a 17,920 S/F Office Warehouse to be built.
City ofHugo. Minnesota
EXHIBIT B
The proposed retail building will consist of approximately 23,000 S/F of space with a variety of
suite sizes to fit the future tenants needs. The unique shape of this building which allows for
strong visibility on Hwy 61 along with the plaza area and front door parking are just a few of the
many attractive features to this building. We have noted some examples of tenants on the
proposed plan in which we anticipate will be utilizing these spaces. We are forecasting business
including but not limited to a coffee shop that may offer a small amount of sandwiches or bakery
items as well as some sort of a small food business that may offer wine or beer to accompany its
menu. The plaza area with outside tables will be very attractive to these types of vendors. We
also anticipate businesses such as health and beauty retailer, cell phone retailer,physical
therapist, message therapist as well as a gift or book store. The site allows for a variety of
businesses and opens up the Hugo community to some that were not able to extend their business
here in the past. The site also will allow for outdoor vendors such as local craft fairs, farmers
markets and specialty items that are made locally.
City of Hugo. Minnesota
EXHIBIT C
William M. Lentsch
Dale K. Dockendorf
Remainder of Investors to be identified
7ity OfHuzo, Minnesota
EXHIBIT D
FRENCHMAN CENTRE PROFORMA
EFFECT ON RETURN ON EQUITY INVESTMENT OF NO TIF
.................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................
WITHOUT TIF WITH TIF
........................................................................................................................................................... ..................................................................................................................................................................
SQ FT RENT/SQ FT SQ FT RENT/SQ FT
................................................................................ ................................. ............................ .............................................................................................................................. ..............................
RETAIL 23,000 --$17.75 $408,250 RETAIL 23,000 **$17.75 $408,250
................................................................................
................................. ............................ ................................................. .....................................
....................................... ...................
TIF $0 TIF $46,000
.................................................................................................................. ............................ ................................................. ............................................................................ ...............................
TOTAL 23,000 $408,250 TOTAL 23,000 $454,250 1
.................................................................................................................... ....................................................................................... ............................................................................................................
I VACANCY 10% $40,825 1 VACANCY 10% $40,825
......................................................................................................... ..............................
EFFECTIVE RENT $367,425 EFFECTIVE RENT $413,425
................................ ............................ ...............................................................................
.................................. .......................................o..............................:
RE TAX ON VACANCY $3.19 sq.ft. $7,337 RE TAX ON VACANCY $7,337
.................................................................................. ................................. ...........................................................................................................
..........................................................................................
I CAM ON VACANCY $3.95 $9,085 1 CAM ON VACANCY $9,085 1
................................................................... ............................ .................................................... ...................I..........
.................................................................................................................... ............................ ..................................................
............................................................................................................
I NOI $351,003NOI $397,003 1
.......... ...........................................................................................................................
DEBT $314,496 1 DEBT $314,496
.......... .............................................................................................................................. ..............................
CASH FLOW $36,507 CASH FLOW $82,507
...................................................................................... ............................................................................................................
.................................................................................. .................................
EQUITY
$828,490 1 1 EQUITY $828,490
.................................................................................. ..................................
............................ ................................................. ..................................... ................................. ..............................
RETURN 4.40% RETURN 9.96%
..................................................................................;.................................;...........................................................................................................
.......................................................... ...............................
......................................................................... ...............................................................................
BLDG VAUSQ FT TOT VAL
23,000 $160.87 $3,700,000
COST: $183.85 $4,228,490 WITHOUT DE-
VELOPER FEE
DEBT AS PERCENT OF COST 80%
DEBT $3,400,000
I EQUITY $828,490
RETURN ON EQUITY GOAL
100/1, $82,849
I DEBT PMT 7% 20 YR $314,496
... .................I................................................................................. .......................................
** Rents at$17.75 may be somewhat above the market. We believe the market is closer to $17 per square
foot. We have based the TIF request on the numbers run by Springsted but believe we may need more.
of Hugo, Minnesota
FRENCHMAN CENTRE PROFORMA
EFFECTS ON RENTS OF NO TIF
.........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................
WITHOUT TIF WITH TIF
r........................ ...................................
SQ FT RENT/SQ FT SQ FT RENT/SQ FT
.................................................. .................................................................................................... ................................................ ................................. ................................. ............................................
RETAIL 23,000 $20.00 $460,000 RETAIL 23,000 $17.75 $408,250
.................................... ...................................... ..................................................................................................................... ............................................
TIF $0 TIF $46,000
.................................... ......................................
TOTAL $460,000 TOTAL $454,250
................................................................................................................ ...................................... ................................................................................... ................................. ............................................
I VACANCY 100/0 $46,000 S VACANCY
100/0 $40,825 1
................................................. ............................................................. ...................................... ................................................. ................................. ................................. ............................................
EFFECTIVE RENT $414,000 EFFECTIVE RENT $413,425
............................................................................................................... -4................................................................................... ................................. ............................................
RE TAX ON VACANCY $3.19 sq.ft. $7,337 RE TAX ON VACANCY $3.19 sq.ft. $7,337
............................................................................................................... ...................................... 4...................................................................................
CAM ON VACANCY 1 $3.95 $9,085 CAM ON VACANCY $3.95 $9,085
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ............................................
................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................ .........................
NOT $397,578 NOT $397,003
................................................................................................................ .............................................................................................. ...............................................................................................................
DEBT $314,496 E 1 DEBT $314,496
................................................. ............................................................. ..................................... ................................................. ................................. ................................. ............................................
CASH FLOW $83,082 CASH FLOW $82,507
............................................................. ......................................
EQUITY $828,490 EQUITY $828,490
................................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... ..............................................................................
RETURN 10.03% E RETURN 9.96%
................................................................................................................ ...................................... ...................................................................................................................... ............................................
.............................................. .............................................................................................................
BLDG VAIJSQ FT TOT VAL
23,000 $160.87 $3,700,000
COST: $183.85 $4,228,490 WITHOUT DE-
VELOPER FEE
DEBT AS PERCENT OF COST 80%
DEBT $3,400,000
EQUITY $828,490
RETURN ON EQUITY GOAL 10% $82,849
DEBT PMT 7% 20 YR $314,496
.................................................................................. ...........................................................................
Rents at $17.75 may be somewhat above the market. We believe the market is closer to $17 per square
foot. We have based the TIF request on the numbers run by Springsted but believe we may need more.
7ity ofHugo. Minnesota
EXHIBIT E
Not known at this time. To be provided.
7iU of Hugo, Minnesota
EXHIBIT F
All that part of tht North 117 of the Northwcst 1/4 of Suction 2.9,Township 31,Mange 21,described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the South line of said tract and the East lime of State Highway No.61,as now widened to 111.feet;
thence North 11 degr=s 51 minutes East,along said Highway lint a distance of 54111 feet to the actual point of beginning of the tract
to be descnlbed;thence Easterly and parallel with the South lime of said North 112 of NW 1/4 a distance of 444 fent;thence Northerly
at right angles to last course a distance of 357.26 feet;thence Westerly and parallel with the South line of said North 112 of NW 114 a
distanct of 325.23 feet to its intersection with the East line of State Highway No.61,as now widened to 111 feet,thence South 1 l
degrees 51 minutia West along said Highway liar a distance of 365.4&at to the actual point of beginning,Washington County,
:Minnesota.
City of Hu--o, Minnesota
EXHIBIT G
See Attached Sworn Construction Statement.
City oho, Minnesota
Sworn Construction Statement
PROPERTY ADDRESS Frenchman Centre(Previous End Zone Bar)
Hugo, MN 55038
23,123 S/F
ITEM FURNISHED BY
1. Plans $15,600.00
2. Survey& Engineering $21,400.00
3. Building Permit/SAC City of Hugo $45,000.00
4. Demo $61,490.00
5. Excavating/Grad n $92,000.00
6. Footings $45,000.00
7. Foundation/Slab $71,000.00
8. Site Utilities $75,000.00
9. Asphalt $65,000.00
10. Reinforcing Steel Rebar $25,000.00
11. Curb&Gutter $15,000.00
12. Sanitary Sewer/Storm See Site Utilities
13. Steel Framing $305,000.00
14. Interior Framing $35,000.00
15. Steel Joist See Framing
16. Waterproofing $15,000.00
17. Windows/Doors $40,000.00
18. Build-out Allowance $20/SF $400,000.00
19. Roofing $76,000.00
20. Insulation $23,500.00
21. Caulking $10,000.00
22. Acoustical Ceiling $80,000.00
23. Electrical $90,000.00
24. Plumbing/HVAC $200,000.00
25. Aluminum Entrances $200,000.00
26. Face Brick/Stone $75,000.00
27. Pavers $60,000.00
28. Interest $125,000.00
City ofHuzo. Minnesota
29. Phase I, Environmental, and
Attorney Fees $26,000.00
30. Conveyance Fee $5,000.00
31. Fire Sprinkler $46,000.00
32. Garage Door $3,000.00
33. Landscaping/Retaining Walls $85,000.00
34. EFIS $113,000.00
37. Leasing Commission $210,000.00
38. Dum ster $2,500.00
39. Land Costs $1,070,000.00
40. Cont. Profit/Overhead $225,000.00
41. Closing Costs $80,000.00
42. Builders Risk Insurance $12,000.00
43. General Condition Site Supervision/Site Trailer/Etc. $85,000.00
TOTALS $4,228,490.00
d
.. ''l���f� �• •his, , -`
r r
Nti r /
r
f
� r
i � I
,S-
CAULFIELD
ARCHITECCURAL
DESIGN
am�sence
PROPERn LWE
._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.—_._._._._._._._..
.... ............................................. 1 BUILDING AREA 23,123 GSF
PARKING REQUIRED 124 SPACES a.uwm«r
PARKING PROVIDED 130 SPACES 1 ! • ! woomwr,rwEwu x s
! ———————— ———————TINI
I ! rt sianrwr
! f ! I
STORM W/!TER
i i ! MANAGE.M.ENT
1 i
: I
i i b
ra,wr.—
ii
I=
m
� onnrm� ✓c
V- i t
-------------
RETAIL PROPOSAL
!i ---------------------- I ! 'ulw.NWESOTA
i
fi !
--————————————————————
———————————
i i:• i
_._._._._._._._._._._ ------ J SITE PIAN
rnuRE l
I
PROPER
I
/1 SITE PLAN S 1
aar i a �
I CAULFIELD
Lill
ARCHITECTURAL
DESIGN
MEOWMAL
Ta SF
23,123 GSF AN.fAW COURT
TRAS4
10WA TEKAXT 6 TENAIUC TEN TD D
4W SF
2MSF IMSF MWGF n79 SF
TENANTE
23155E —TMT
O
...............
.......... .................. ............
TIMI(TF
"WSF
............
—WATM
...........
TEKVAG
IPASF
elw
0 ED ............ .................
... ................ TEWITH
2MBF
n ROOF PLANmwulare
TEMANTI
14WSF
...........................
RETAIL PROPOM
TENAWFJ
14908F H",WSOTA
...........................................................
ir
TBWIFK f
GALL
SM 8F —A
................................................................
..... .......... .... .... . ....................
TEMAPIT
22408F
.. a1Hr11r1F
FLOOR PLAN
..............
SIGNAGE PARAMETERS ,)FLVPLM AlAi jE, ,
—T-
I �
CS!4."Yrh�fXS�4�7k�4K4i�1w",Yr1%i� _�.••"•Gk�. @2! ®i�YY®1 1�4'.3tltl�62"`"�"' '° L�1� 8PLgA�
�-�0_L'Q.710_ -_._ .,__.;._IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII_._IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIMil IIIIIII_.__11111IIIII%///////////.I. MIIII_a�a,w ::.�R__XN uas»t Room"
--- ■- �-i- --
..................... --
:: ._II111 .it.. �1�.:•�..,...::� ill:.��...._���e�_----=
v
-------------------
w
w
v
ks n
iA. �. YsxffiAi,%�w�cza-b.. _. Y3AY' _rna;aaSJ�Ee :. ..
v
!!!!!!!!!!!!!II!!!!!!I!!_ i ����•��••�u�u _��+� _-- ---- _-- -_--!!!!!!114!19!P!!IIIII�!!!!!!Illlllllulll!!III—!!!!!I!!!II!I!!!IIIIIIII„_®ca.._
MSI!:llo- ,IIC...� 11111__._:�If,.:1_.1! IL...� 11111: 11011 ;11011.__..:..1!
v
'ities craft their _ hey l
Thecampaign went a step
year when the
ST. PAUL PIONEER PRESS WWW.TWINCITIES.COM area's chamber of commerce
Rao but what, �` and economic development
group merged to form Greater
CONTINUED FROM THE COVER Mankato Growth Inc. g
�xaetly, makes a "We've been able s,leverage
each other's resources,common
branding and common look and,
Uburb unique? Right brand Guess the City slogan feel," said Jonathan Zierdt,
president of Greater Mankato
(continued from Page 1A) Choose from these cities:Edina, Falcon Heights, Grand Rapids, Growth.
Hopkins, Lakeville, Minneapolis, New Brig Mon,,North St. Paul, The organization is in the
idng right `brand for local Branding projects are under Stillwater,West St. Paul process of gauging the cam-
ntity can be pricey process way in Burnsville,Anoka, Coon paign's success. So far, it has
Rapids and Centerville. gained enough attention for
St.Paul and Minneapolis are other cities to use it as an exam-
BY MARICELLA MIRANDA unveiling a united branding �' 2' 3' 4. ple of a branding effort that
effort Tuesday, called More to 'We're "City of '"The city the
fiber e works.
Pioneer Press close to Lakes" that Warks the fiomc? But will Greater Life," aimed to attract people to it all" for you" Mankato
' community" and its"A little Twin rr MMa.A lot
Amery,Wis.,more a city of lakes than both cities.
.eapolis? But marketing a new brand ------ -- ---- — --— Minnesota"ever be as national-
)es Anoka have a richer history than isn't cheap. ly recognized as New York and
later? Or is Mahtomedi more "small Cities can spend as mh as ' its"I(heart)New York?"
"than North St.Paul? $25,000 on branding consultucants. Zferdt says, "Why couldn't
nese cities claim to be unique, but the Local businesses paid for the, 7. We?" +
ies they use to describe themselves are $3 million to$5 million rebrand S. 6. "Southern
y identical. Ing campaign in St. Paul and "Birthplace of ",..for Irving, ' Gateway to the
any city leaders say a clever phrase can Minneapolis. Minnesota" learning,raising Twin Cities'
people to live, work and vacation in a "Some of the suburbs have a, executive _ families
m place. Officials are willing to bet &
g _
greater identity than others,"' doing business"
sands of dollars hours of staff time and said Louis Jamboisl -
hs of research to create just the right director of the Association of 10.
n to attract people and money. Metropolitan Municipalities. "A small town=
ipically, companies use branding to "It's worthwhile for those com- 8 9 atmosphere
vent" themselves. Today, cities are munities to think about what Think "ThFair
in a large
ne r
taglines,logos and color schemes as a their identity is." metropolitan'
,o set themselves apart. Hopkins" city" area
THAT'S MY TAGLINE '
RIGHT BRAND,4A
In the land of lakes and sub- 'ANSWERS:
'
orbs,finding a distinctive trait
• is a challenge. 1.west St.Paul,2.Minneapolis,3.New Brighton,4.Grand Rapids,
S.Stillwater,6. Edina,7.Lakeville,8.Hopkins,9.Falcon Heights,
02008 St.Paul Pioneer Press(Northwest Publications) Many cities end up using the 10.North St.Paul PIONEER PRESS
* same themes for taglines. Bod-
ies of water, community, geo- tourism and marketing for the uled to be complete by July. At
graphic gateways and history bureau. And before that, the that time, the City Council
are particularly popular. bureau tagline was'"The Corn would decide when and how; to
North St. Paul calls itself"a Stops Here." implement the brand. I
small-town atmosphere in a "It's not as easy as you thTk-
large metropolitan area," while THE RIGHT BRAND it might be," Council Member
neighboring Mahtomedi is `A Liz Workman said at Tuesday's.-
'Small
uesday"s;'Small Town'City." sties, like companies, want work session meeting. "Brand`
Anoka is the "Historic River Vto reinvent themselves to ing — it's more than just a
City,"and,miles away on anoth- attract attention. tagline and a logo. You have to
er river,Stillwater is the"Birth- It's a way for municipalities let go of your own perceptions
place of Minnesota." to stay "fresh," Jambois said, and biases,or you'll fail."
Sometimes,cities even share adding that the Association of Anoka hired a branding con-
the same slogans, like Amery, Metropolitan Municipalities sultant last year for$23,250.The
Wis., and Minneapolis— which went through a rebranding project started last week and
call themselves the "City• of effort itself a few years ago. could take as long as four
Lakes."Amery City Administra- A new brand can enhance months to complete.
for Julie Riemenschneider said residents' pride in cities and "We're hoping it will help
she knew they shared the same draw attention from investors with tourism ... businesses ...
tagline. and potential homeowners,Jam- housing," city spokesman Pam
"There's enough distance bois said. But most importantly, Bowman said.
(between us),"she said. he said,it can give a community Anoka uses the tagline"His-
But Burnsville and Lakeville, the chance to look inside itself toric River City,"because it's on
which are about 10 miles apart, and ask how others perceive it. the Rum and Mississippi rivers.
share the same tagline, too. "It's a fun exercise, too," he But retail businesses tend to
Both cities call themselves the said. use "Rediscover Anoka" to
"southern gateway to the Twin Burnsville city leaders attract customers.
Cities." kicked off its branding effort "We're trying to redefine
Burnsville adopted the slo- this week after hearing requests (ourselves) and do what we can
gan because Interstate 35W and from local businesses, schools to get people to come to Anoka,"
Interstate 35E join in the city, and residents for the city to put Bowman said. "It seems a lot of.
municipal spokesman Jim Skel- out a cohesive image. the cities are going through it
ly said.Lakeville began using it The project could create new right now"
because it's the metro area's logos, a colors scheme and a
southernmost city, tagline. A COHESIVE IMAGE
Lakeville City Administrator Local businesses, schools
Steve Mielke said the city offi- and other city groups would be jn many cases,cities use differ-
cially adopted the tagline in 2005 free to adopt the entire brand or lent taglines than convention
after a branding initiative. It pieces of it, said Bridget Dal- and visitors bureaus or Cham-
recently put the tagline across rymple, special projects coordi- bers of commerce, because the
its revamped Web site. nator in Burnsville. organizations market to differ-
"I didn't realize we had per- City staff last year began ent groups.
haps stolen it from anybody," exploring options for consulting The rules usually change
Mielke said. firms, which charge $15,000 to when it comes to cities with
Before the city used the slo- $80,000. On Tuesday, the City larger tourism industries, Brit-
gan, the Lakeville Minnesota Council agreed to hire a consult- ton said. Those cities tend to
Area Convention & Visitors ant. work more closely with their
Bureau used the phrase, said Research and brand develop- visitor bureaus and chambers of
Jeanne Britton, director of ment for the project is sched- commerce to market one cohe-
sive message.
e
2008 Kidz-N-Biz Registration
Sunday, April 61'', 1:00 p.m. - 3:30 p.m.
HBA MEMBERS $50.00 Entry Fee
Non-Members $125.00 HBA Fee + $50 Entry Fee =$175.00
Fee Includes: Table, 2 Chairs, Business Name Sign, all advertising, marketing &
organization. Last years attendance was over 1200 people. Adult Attendees will receive a
stamp card to visit each vendor and then will return for a drawing for large prizes. Children
will receive door prize coupons to win toys & games that are provided by HBA & EDA.
You may have a separate Adult/Child door prize(s) at your table if you wish to provide them.
"Consider using our insert fee for all bags ensuring that each visitor receives your
information you will need to provide 1500 flyers no later than 3/28/08.
The Citizen Phone: 651-426-6399 Fax: 651-426-5589
Contact: Shannon DeVinny Phone: 651-426-6399
E-mail: advertising_C&readthecitizen.com
Contact: Paula Romero
E-mail: promeroC@readthecitizen.com Phone: 651-407-9695
Deadline for entry 3/30/2008 Call us if you need flyer print rates!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kidz N Biz April 6, 2008 1:00 -3:30p.m.
Business Name:
Contact Name:
Phone #:
E-Mail:
Yes, I am an HBA Member & would like a table. ($50.00)
Yes, I would like a table & HBA Membership ($175.00)
Yes, I would like to insert our flyers in 1500 bags. ($25.00)
Mail Payment To: THE CITIZEN ATTN: SHANNON DEVINNY PO BOX 393 HUGO MN 55038