The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2005.05.16 EDA Packet AGENDA CITY OF HUGO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORIZTY MONDAY, MAY 16, 2005 - 8:30 AM HUGO CITY HALL 8:30 am 1. Call to Order 8:31 am 2. Roll Call 8:32 am 3. Approval of Minutes • EDA Meeting of April 18, 2005 8:35 am 4. Guest Speaker—Dave Dobosenski 8:50 am 5. May 5, 2005 TIF Subcommittee Report 9:10 am 6. Update on RFP on City Lot in BEIP 511 Addition 9:25 am 7. Update on Purchase of Old Antique Store & Jim Powell's House 9:45 am 8. April 17, 2005 Hugo Kidz & Biz Fest • Future EDA/HBA Activities 10:00 am 9. Discussion of Marketing Plan 10:15 am 10. Discussion of Web Site Updates 10:25 am 11. East Metro Economic Development Forum on June 16, 2005 10:30 am 12. Adjournment BACKGROUND MEMO FOR EDA MEETING OF MAY 12, 2005 3. EDA MEETING OF APRIL 18, 2005 City staff recommends the Board approve the minutes for the April 18, 2005 meeting as presented. 4. GUEST SPEAKER—DAVE DOBOSENSKI-FAIRVIEW LAKES REGIONAL HEALTHCARE SYTEM Fairview Lakes Regional Healthcare System is preparing to locate a clinic within the City of Hugo. Dave Dobosenski is the Chief Operating Officer of Fairview Lakes and will be in attendance to discuss the details surrounding the new clinic. Staff suggests the EDA take the opportunity to welcome this exciting new business into the community. 5. MAY 5, 2005 TIF SUBCOMMITTEE REPORT At the April 18, 2005 joint City Council and EDA meeting, Council and EDA members listened to a Power Point presentation from Paul Steinman and Mikaela Huot of Springsted and Mary Ippel of Briggs and Morgan explaining Tax Increment Financing. The Council and EDA appointed a subcommittee to draw boundaries for a potential TIF District. The TIF subcommittee consists of Frank Puleo, Mike Granger, Teresa Charpentier and Nick Skarich. The Committee met on May 5, 2005. Puleo and Charpentier were absent, and Miron sat in as an alternate. The Committee set preliminary TIF boundaries for further discussion at a subsequent subcommittee meeting. City staff will provide a summary of the meeting, and requests direction from the EDA as to the next steps— �_ r�r�-�-� ��v�—� 1 6. UPDATE ON RFP ON CITY LOT IN BEIP 5TH ADDITION With direction from the EDA and City Council, the City staff prepared an RFP and sent it to over 50 developers, posted it on the City's website, the League of Minnesota Cities website, and listed it on the Minnesota Commercial Realtors Property Database. So far the staff has received numerous promising phone calls in response to the RFP. Proposals are due on May 27, 2005, and will be reviewed by the BEIP subcommittee (Granger, Skarich, Klein). Results of the RFP will be made available to the EDA at the next meeting. 7. UPDATE ON PURCHASE OF OLD ANTIQUE STORE AND JIM POWELL'S HOUSE CD Director Bryan Bear will provide an update to the EDA related to the City's purchase of these two properties. 1 8. HUGO KIDS & BIZ FEST City Administrator Mike Ericson will provide the EDA with an overview of the successful Kids &Biz fest which was held on April 17, 2005. City staff requests input from the EDA for future activities that could be jointly sponsored by the EDA and the HBA. 9. DISCUSSION OF MARKETING PLAN Former intern Tom Denaway and CD Director Bryan Bear met with Teresa Charpentier and Phil Klein to discuss a marketing program including a website update, entry signs, business receptions,business cards,brochures, and development plans. Committee members and City staff will discuss with the EDA the next steps for implementation of a marketing plan. 10. DISCUSSION OF WEB SITE UPDATE Theresa Charpentier has forwarded to the staff suggestions for updating the City's website relating to EDA efforts. Staff seeks input from the EDA related to the website. So far, the website contains basic information related to EDA members, agendas and minutes. The RFP for the Bald Eagle Industrial Park is also located on the website. 11. EAST METRO ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FORUM ON JUNE 16, 2005 Sponsored by the Washington County Workforce Investment Board, the forum will provide an opportunity to share ideas with other Economic Development officials. At the forum, Hugo is invited to share a report on recent activities of the EDA. Staff would like to gather ideas for this report from EDA members prior to the forum MINUTES FOR THE JOINT EDA/CITY COUNCIL MEETING OF APRIL 18, 2005 Mayor Miron called the meeting to order at 8:30 am. COUNCIL PRESENT: Granger, Haas, Petryk, Puleo, Miron STAFF: City Administrator Mike Ericson, CD Director Bryan Bear, and Intern Tom Denaway EDA PRESENT: Janice Arcand, Theresa Charpentier. Phil Klein, Nick Skarich, Jim Bever, Mike Granger, and Fran Miron EDA MEETING OF MARCH 21, 2005 Granger made motion, Klein, to approve the March 21, 2005 EDA meeting minutes as presented. All aye. Motion Carried. UPDATE ON MEETING OF BEIP SUBCOMMITTEE At its last meeting, the EDA directed the BEIP Subcommittee to prepare and distribute Requests for Proposals for the development of Lot 1, Block 1 of the Bald Eagle Industrial Park. The RFP has been posted on the Minnesota Commercial Realtors Property Database and the League of Minnesota's webpage, additionally the RFP was mailed to a list of 56 developers. CD Director Bear provided the Board with an update on this project. CDBG SUBCOMMITTEE MEETING WITH COMMISSIONER HEGBERG At its last meeting the EDA directed staff to schedule a meeting with the CDBG subcommittee, Washington County Commissioner Hegberg, and Citizen Advisory committee member Bo Bogatty. On April 14, 2005,they met City staff, Mayor Miron, EDA Vice President Phil Klein, and Jane Harper from the county. Jane informed the group that there were numerous excellent projects this year, more than ever before. Mayor Miron agreed that it was important to meet to bring the county up-to-date on the City's project and focus on downtown redevelopment. PRESENTATION FROM SPRINGSTED INC. ON TAX INCREMENT FINANCING At its last meeting, the EDA directed staff to schedule a joint City Council/EDA workshop with the City's Financial Advisor Springsted, Inc., and the City's bond counsel Briggs and Morgan, to discuss the use of Tax Increment Financing(TIF). Paul Steinman and Mikaela Huot of Springsted and Mary Ippel of Briggs and Morgan presented Council and the EDA with a PowerPoint presentation explaining TIF and they answered questions. City Staff is seeking Council and EDA direction regarding the use of TIF. Mary Ippel explained the merits of an interfund loan resolution. Granger made motion, Bever seconded, to recommend this to the Council at its next meeting. EDA- All aye. Motion Carried. After continued discussion about the merits of creating a TIP District, Council and EDA agreed to appoint a TIF Subcommittee: Joint Council/EDA Meeting of April 18, 2005 Page 2 Miron made motion, Klein seconded, voted to appoint from Council Mike Granger and Frank Puleo, and from EDA Nick Skarich and Theresa Charpentier, to explore further the use of TIF and determine district boundaries. EDA—All aye. Motion Carried. ADJOURNMENT Granger made motion, Petryk seconded, to adjourn the Council meeting at 10:15 am. All aye. Motion Carried. Michael A. Ericson City Administrator s Public Sector Advisors Y Springsted ° Hugo City Council and Economic Development Authority Meeting April 18,2005 Tax Increment Financing Downtown Redevelopment Tools P•,;cki Sector do- so:, Springsted 1 N r-f Ml Y J ��111{{{7 IIII}i S1S ILr[7 - 1�L}.I�I�t�l ..� ;'tl� J � 1 tSy. JJJ.J I �.• k S��y�,s '�f19Y �v-`". 1 I a t Overview • Planned re-route of CSAH 8114 • Downtown top priority for policy makers • Completed downtown plan • Acquisition of parcels — Must complete interfund loan resolution to reimburse with TI • Application for CDBG funds • Interested developers — Senior Housing — Other components of downtown plan ;e tc na:ac e. s Sprinqsted J Next Steps — Resources • Is redevelopment likely to require some form of public participation? — Acquisition, demolition, relocation • Redevelop substandard buildings — Infrastructure improvements • Street, storm sewer, signalization • Tax Increment Financing/Tax Abatement — TIF Redevelopment District — Create a source of funds A s Springsted Redevelopment District • Identification of District Boundaries • Qualifications — Improved parcels make up at least 70%of the district. To be considered improved,at least 15%of the parcel's area must contain improvements. — More than 50%of the buildings(excluding outbuildings)are structurally substandard to a degree requiring substantial renovation or clearance. — A building is not considered substandard ff it could be brought up to code at a cost of less than 15%of a comparable new building on that parcel. Sesta •a-. 7 Springsted 4 Redevelopment District (cont.) • Term — 25 years after the date of receipt of first increment(26 years maximum). • Restrictions — At least 90%of the increment must be used to finance the costs of correcting conditions that allow designation of redevelopment districts. These costs include but are not limited to: • Acquiring properties containing substandard improvements or hazardous substances; • Acquiring adjacent parcels necessary to provide a site of sufficient size to permit development; • Demolition and rehabilitation of structures,clearing of land; • Removal or remediation of hazardous substances;and • Installation of utilities,roads,sidewalks and parking facilities. sech: e 5Pringstec Eligible TIF Expenditures • Specified purposes permitted in the underlying development statutes for cities, HRAs, EDAs, and Port Authorities. • Administrative expenditures are limited to 10%of the expenditures authorized in the TIF Plan or 10%of actual increment expenditures, whichever is less. • Increment may not be used to finance buildings that are used "primarily and regularly for conducting the business"of any unit of government. ,btic Seetc fi....,o s e 5princistee ,t 5 Financing Bond Financing • Bonds may be issued without election if at least 20%of debt service is reasonably expected to be paid with increment. Pay-As-You-Go Financing • Developer finances TIF-eligible costs as they are incurred, and authority promises to reimburse the developer from tax increment over time, if and when it is generated. • Typically structured as a revenue note issued to the developer, with an interest component to compensate the developer for costs of upfront financing. .n.,c weir., aio Springstec Adopting a TIF Plan • Notice to County Board and School District, at least 30 days prior to City Council public hearing. • For redevelopment districts, the individual county commissioner representing the site must also receive a notice at least 30 days before the publication of the hearing notice(40 days prior to public hearing). • Published notice, 10-30 days prior to public hearing. • Review by the Planning Commission. • Public hearing before City Council and EDA. • Request for Certification to County Auditor. SpringsteC 6 Time Limit #1 : 3 Year Rule • Within three years of certification, one of three things must occur for district to remain alive: — Bonds are issued to aid the project, — Authority acquires property within the district, or — Authority causes public improvements to be constructed within the district. "iir 5,.,rtc,Ai-,--_ 12 SD:inastt� Time Limit #2: 4 Year Rule (Knock Down) • Increment will not be collected from a particular parcel unless, within four years of certification, demolition, rehabilitation or renovation of property or other site improvements has occurred in accordance with TIF plan. • If a parcel is"knocked-down"and later improved, it can be reinstated in the district, but at the market value at the time of reinstatement. sectrp .,;.„s 13 Springsteo i. 7 Time Limit #3: 5 Year Rule • For increment to be considered a spent expenditure within the TIF District,one of the following must occur within five years after certification of the district: — TI is paid to a 3rd party for a TIF eligible expenditure, — Bonds are sold to a 3rd party and proceeds expected to be spent within 5 years, — Binding contracts are entered into with a 3rd party for performance of an activity and increment is spent under the contract,or — Costs are incurred by a"party"and revenues are spent to reimburse that party. :,or< .•cso• a:r.,s<; 14 Springsted Conclusions and Recommendations • Approve interfund loan resolution • Appoint EDA subcommittee • Identify geographic boundary of District • Complete blight examination/substandard test • Utilize building official • Contract • Create/certify redevelopment TIF District plan sectc;r na:,•c , 15 Springsted g Questions? Paul Steinman-Ph.(651)223-3066 Mikaeia Huot-Ph.(651)223-3036 E-mail: psteinmarospringsted.com E-mail:mbuott@sOnqsted.com Puuh(sect.:: 16 Spr i ngsted 9 r REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR DEVELOPMENT OF CITY OWNED PROPERTY IN BALD EAGLE INDUSTRIAL PARK PROPOSALS DUE: LOCATION: CITY OF HUGO 14669 FIZTGERALD AVE. N HUGO, MN 55038 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. PURPOSE OF REQUEST II. INTRODUCTION - GENERAL INFORMATION III. INSTRUCTION TO PROPOSERS IV. DESCRIPTION OF SITE V. DESIRED DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS/CONTRIBUTIONS VI. CITY OF HUGO COMMITMENTS VII. PROPOSAL CONTENTS VIII. SELECTION IX. PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE X. TERMS AND CONDITIONS REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS HUGO,MINNESOTA I. PURPOSE OF THE REQUEST The City of Hugo is requesting proposals for the development of City owned property in the Bald Eagle Industrial Park (BEIP), information concerning the City's needs is outlined in the following Request for Proposals. II. INTRODUCTION The City of Hugo is a rapidly growing suburb of St. Paul with a present population of approximately 9,000 residents,which is likely to double within the next ten years. Hugo is currently experiencing immense residential growth, having issued 173 residential building permits by the end of March. The key factors driving this growth are the relative availability of undeveloped land, and the close proximity of Hugo to major freeways and downtown St. Paul. The City Council in the mid 1990's made the economic growth and diversification of Hugo's tax base a priority, which resulted in the development of the Bald Eagle Industrial Park (BEIP). The goal in creating the industrial park was to diversify Hugo's tax base through an increase of industry located within Hugo, and to increase the potential for Hugo residents to live and work within the City. Presently, the sites in the park have either been developed or are owned by private developers. The site highlighted in this RFP is the lone remaining City owned parcel, and is a high visibility corner lot located on the main thoroughfare of the industrial park. The City is seeking an experienced and qualified developer to acquire this property and develop it to its highest and best use. The City will provide preference to proposals based on; proposed tenants, full development of site, and the potential for job creation. The City of Hugo has already provided financial assistance in the development of this site,which is reflected in the below market price of the property. The City expects the private development firm to embrace and support the principles demonstrated by the development covenants of the BEIP. In turn, the City is committed to a public/private partnership and a win/win relationship. III. INSTRUCTIONS TO PROPOSERS A. All proposals should be sent and all questions and correspondence should be directed to: City of Hugo Attn: Bryan Bear 14669 Fitzgerald Ave N Hugo,MN 55038 (651) 762-6320 B. All proposals must be received no later that 2:00 p.m., Friday, May 27, 2005 Fifteen (15) copies of the proposal must be presented. The copies shall be sealed and clearly identified with"Development Proposal" by the submittal deadline. C. In order to be considered a valid proposal, each proposal must meet the following requirements: a. Written proposals received after 2:00 pm 05/27/2005 will not be considered. b. Each proposal must be signed by an officer of your company who can be held accountable for all representations. D. The proposal shall be limited to a maximum of 20 pages,printed on one side. Additional material, other than that requested by the City of Hugo,will be disregarded. E. The City will review the proposals, and will schedule interviews for finalists F. Proposers are prohibited from contacting any representatives of the City Council for purposes of lobbying to secure this contract IV. DESCRIPTION OF SITE ❖ LOCATION The site consists of a single parcel 3.3 acres in size. The property is located in a City developed industrial park known as the Bald Eagle Industrial Park. The property is an undeveloped greenfield. Connections to City services and a regional storm water management system have been provided, thus requiring minimal on site storm water ponding. The property is a corner lot,bounded by Fenway Boulevard on the west and Fenway Boulevard Circle on the South. The City is in the process of constructing a railroad spur into the industrial park. This spur would not abut the proposal site,but its use would be available to a potential occupant. A vicinity map highlighting the parcel and the surrounding neighborhood has been included. ❖ ZONING The property is zoned I-3 (General Industrial), any proposed development would be expected to comply with this zoning. A copy of the I-3 Zoning Regulations has been enclosed. ❖ DESIGN GUIDELINES A set of Development Covenants was created in conjunction with the development of the BEIP, a copy of which has been provided. Any proposal would be expected to comply with the design guidelines and land uses outlined in the covenants of the park. Other elements the City desires include: ❖ The City is seeking a proposal with an end user in mind,proposals including a tenant may be given priority. ❖ The BEIP was created with the goal of diversifying Hugo's tax base and the creation of jobs, proposals will be evaluated on the potential increase in land value, and on the number of jobs created. ❖ Full development of the site. The City will give preference to proposals which utilize the full site at the time of construction. Phase(d) developments may be viewed less favorably. V. DESIRED DEVELOPER COMMITMENTS/CONTRIBUTIONS ❖ The developer must demonstrate an understanding and commitment to the development i covenants of the BEIP. ❖ The developer must demonstrate the experience necessary to organize and deliver a high quality project of this type and scale. ❖ The developer is expected to provide private capital to fund %100 of the value of this project. The purchase price of the property is $166,768, which would be due within 30 days of award unless otherwise permitted by the City ❖ The developer will provide a non-refundable cash deposit of$10,000 upon award. VI. CITY OF HUGO COMMITMENTS ❖ The City of Hugo developed the industrial park using Tax Increment Financing, which is reflected in the below market price of the land. Additional gap financing will not be available on the site. VII. PROPOSAL CONTENTS All submitted proposals should include: A. A narrative outlining the project approach B. A detailed concept proposal with estimated construction time frames outlined D. Background summary of related development experience, financing capacity and references from at least three communities where you have completed similar developments E. Detail of unique characteristics and design elements that will be incorporated into the project VIII. SELECTION Evaluation of Proposals Proposals will be evaluated,based on the criteria listed below, to ascertain which proposal best meets the needs of the City. 1. Responsiveness of the proposer in clearly stating the understanding of the work to be performed. 2. Technical experience of the firm. 3. Experience and professional activities of the project team. 4. Size and structure of the firm. 5. Potential increase in land value 6. Potential number of jobs created 7. Timeliness of construction of property 8. Letter of intent from potential tenant Proposals will be reviewed and evaluated by a subcommittee of the Hugo Economic Development Authority(EDA). The subcommittee will include the City of Hugo Administrator, Community Development Director, and three Board members of the EDA, one of whom is also a City Council Member. The evaluation will be provided to the EDA to be used in the selection of developers for final interviews. The proposals selected for final interviews will be required to submit final site proposals prior to developer interviews. The City reserves the right to reject any and all proposals submitted and to request additional information from proposers. The award made will be the firm, which, in the opinion of the City, is best qualified, and provides the greatest increase to the City's tax and employment bases. IX. PRELIMINARY PROJECT SCHEDULE ❖ Proposals Due: May 27,2005 2:00 pm ❖ Finalist Notified: Tentatively scheduled for June 3, 2005 ❖ Developer Interviews: Tentatively scheduled for June 20,2005 ❖ Award of Contract: Tentatively scheduled for first Council Meeting in July X. TERMS AND CONDITIONS A. The City of Hugo reserves the right to cancel or amend the request for proposals at anytime. The City of Hugo reserves the right to determine the successful respondent. The City of Hugo reserves the right to reject any or all proposals. B. The City of Hugo will not be liable for any costs incurred by the firm responding to this request. C. A contract will be executed between the successful respondent and the City of Hugo. It is anticipated that the successful firm's proposal and the specifications of this request, including the Terms and Conditions set forth herein,will be incorporated in the contract. D. The firm shall not assign any interest in this contract and shall not transfer any interest in the same without the prior written consent of the City of Hugo. E. For the purposes of this agreement, the consultant shall be deemed to be an independent contractor, and not an employee of the organization. Any and all agents, servants, or employees of the firm or other persons,while engaged in the performance of any work or services required to be performed by the City of Hugo under this agreement, shall not be considered employees of the City of Hugo and any and all actions which arise as a consequence of any act or omission of the firm, its agents, servants, employees or other persons shall in no way be the obligation or responsibility of the City of Hugo. The consultant, its agents, servants, or employees shall be entitled to none of the rights,privileges, or benefits of organization employees except as otherwise my be stated herein. F. The developer further agrees to comply with all federal, state and local laws or ordinances, and all applicable rules, regulation, and standards established by any agency of such governmental units, which are now or hereafter promulgated insofar as they relate to the firm's performance of the provisions of this agreement. G. If, for any reason, the firm shall fail to fulfill in timely and proper manner the obligations under the contract, the City of Hugo shall reserve the right to terminate the contract by specifying the date of termination in a written notice to the firm at least thirty (30) calendar days before the termination date. H. No official or employee of the City of Hugo who exercises any responsibilities in the review, approval or carrying out of the contract shall participate in any decision which affects his or her direct or indirect personal or financial interest. Agenda Number J.4 CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Mike Ericson, City Administrator FROM: Bryan Bear, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Jim and Kelly Powell Residence, 14625 Forest Blvd. N. DATE: May 12, 2005, for the City Council Meeting of May 16, 2005 1. BACKGROUND AND ANALYSIS: Jim and Kelly Powell have approached the City regarding the possible sale of their residence. It is a four bedroom house with two bathrooms built in 1895 located on 0.93 acres of land at 14625 Forest Blvd. City staff shared with the Powell's the value of the residence determined by City Assessor Frank Langer, of$173,500. The Powell's decided to hire their own appraiser who recently determined the value to be approximately$265,000. City staff has reviewed the appraisal with Frank Langer,who has suggested that a reasonable market value for the residence would be$210,000. On May 12,2005, John Benson, Frank Langer and myself inspected the residence, and determined it to be in very good condition with no obvious structural problems. Living conditions in the house are good, and I would expect that the City could easily rent the property if it was purchased. The only concern noted during the inspection is the strong possibly that the house is clad with siding containing asbestos. Siding containing asbestos should not be a concern unless the building were to be demolished or re-sided. Since the property is a potential site for a redevelopment project,the City would be required to perform an environmental assessment before demolishing the building, and the presence of asbestos will substantially increase the cost of removing the building. The Powell's still appear to be interested in selling their house to the City,however they would like to lease the house back from the City until they find a new place to live. The staff is negotiating the terms and conditions for a purchase of the property. The purchase price of the property should not exceed $265,000. 2. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The staff recommends the Council approve the purchase of the Powell residence at a price not to exceed $265,000. Subject to Council approval, the staff will immediately present a purchase agreement to the Powell's and will negotiate the terms and conditions for the purchase. 4 � g Hugo Marketing Program DRAFT — 3/15/05 Theme: Hugo — We invite everyone interested in retaining a high quality of life, expanding personal opportunities and desires the support of the community. Tagline: Hugo — A community of growth and opportunity. Marketing Action Items: Action Item Comments Goal Person(s) Complete/ Alignment Resp. Due Date Website Need to include EDA vision, 5 EDA 5/16 Update mission, objectives, theme, Marketing taglines Team and City Staff NE Hugo Pratt homes are developing a sign 4 Jim Bever TBD City Entry and landscape opportunity. Meet Sign with Pratt and help to achieve the vision. Hugo Intent to open our EDA doors and 1/7 TBD TBD Business be a listening post. Action items Reception required include: personal invites all businesses. Centerville and Hugo. And, Washington Cty investment board?. Phone call follow ups to top 20% of tax base. Paper announcement. Lighted sign. Dates: 5/xx, xx or xx @ 7pm. Dessert, coffee, water. Staff agenda. Put event on HBA and Lions April. All Other For the other signs discuss at a 4 Jim Bever TBD Hugo City Business reception and Poss. Entry Signs Support from Lions—fund drive EDA One single card with each of our 1/5 City Staff April 18 Business names and contact information 1 Cards along with the city defined staff. EDA Request to solicit examples from 5 EDA April 18 Brochure other cities. Then determine concept, design, development and launch plan. EDA EDA needs a drawing of the 8/3 EDA/City Development various"opportunity locations" Staff Plan that we can"sell" to expand, attract and retain. This should be a phased approach with target dates of availability. This will also include a"hit list"of businesses that are desirable and undesirable. 2 From:MINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRI651 646 4215 04/05/2005 09:44 #094 P.001/015 D� �s h ; ----------- K ,l L'�j -h S T`� L /'111 Grp►C �i`n e-77 i �5070� J fl L C4l From:MINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRI651 646 4215 r 04/05/'2005 00:44 #094 p.002/015 �Z> i�� JTA��-L, VA ,e ——------------ 4 / r� ;, 5 �� r �c• t r1�,' r I � � -1 �US %9G✓ (, � SlC �`► t V�Si �' �1 , Lry � rSs , - of ►= ►. 1 t v� �; j1-r'C�.'S� � ►!��,� TS i' 1 i •�- 1 h�vtc rc� J , II n 12v��SS i��s►STG��1� � - Lle� j -ri2o ��c._ TS ---- _ From:MINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRI651 646 4215 04/05/2005 09:44 #094 P-003/015 --------------------- �✓/`�_ / %of U /Tl�s U r /� n h r AOI , Li � �CS From:MINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRI651 646 4215 04105/2005 00:44 #094 P.0041015 L� tj v C) Flo J -e -- T ► v- S b o r l {�c�� From:MINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRI651 646 4215 04/05/2005 09:44 #094 P.005/015 EDA bers Page 1 of 2 I NEW Search Hugo Site NEREM inkECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY PA EDA -- : flt, m e, f �fr4 • ------- s-sion- Fran Miron, Mayor 15250 Homestead Ave. N. Hugo. MN 55038 651-429-5961 Michael E. Granger, Council Representative 12715 Ethan Ave. N. Hugo, MN 5038 651-426-8171UG mailto megrangerQusinternet.corm r15 P 2 r Jan ArcandICS (moo 1850 Cedar Ave. White Bear Lake, MN 55110 SG 651-429-2930 Jim Bever 7131 132nd St. N. Hugo, MN 5038 651-426-2240 Theresa Charpentier 5925 Freeland Ct. N, Hugo, MN 55038 651-426-6725 mailto:theresa.charpentier(@mdi.org Phil Klein 6760 165th St. N. Hugo, MN 55038 651-653-7152 mai Ito:phi llip.klein(a-).northstarfinancial.com Nick Skarich , 6265 Egg Lake Rd. N. htti)://www.ei.huvo.mn.us/Economic Development Authority/EDA Commission Memb... 04/04/2005 CD ......... CD Co C� ...... cr) cr) C=) LO R I ��, ' f 7 CC, LLJ 11 f-r- LLJ -:c d-V -w E 0 From:MINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRI651 646 4215 04105/2005 09:45 #094 P.007/015 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY Page 1 of 1 ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT A UTHORITIO Meeting Minutes: October 26, 2004 November 15. 2004 December_20,..2004_ Dv�-- )mcg http://www.ci.hugo.n-n.us/Economic_Development_Authority/EDA_Minutes_Page.htm 04/04/2005 From:MINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDIJSTRI651 646 4215 04/05/2005 09:45 #094 P.008/015 by) TO Add^ From:MINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRI651 646 4215 04/05/2005 09:45 #094 P.009,1015 C- A-) -` /"I c- TC t Sw �rr From:MINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRI651 646 4215 04/05/2005 09:45 #094 P.010/015 E From:MINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRI651 646 4215 04/05/2005 09:45 #094 P.011/015 0 t1w "L)-g u e44 �� v I�us ► �ti� ss of 0 From:MINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRI651 646 4215 04/05/12005 00:45 #094 P.012/015 Johnson City, Washington County Tennessee Economic Development Board - Industrial ... Page 1 of 12 127 1 &151 lte S S Dl r 90 - :sY, 3 , Jdhnson .+Cit Jonesbbrom r ; Wasteingtatf Cotrnl Contact Us IZI Printable Version G Company Size Key (A) 1 -25 (B) 26-50 (C) 51 -75 Updated: March 2005 (D) 76 -100 (E) 101 -150 (F)151 -200 Codes: I = Importer (G) 201 -250 300 251 (1) 251 -300 E =Exporter HQ=Headquarters (J) 401 -500 750 50 (L)751 -999 Note: Underlined Company Names Link to (M) 1000+ Websites Italicized are Standard Industrial Codes (SIC) for Each Business 11 1 Link to List of Distributors AAA Anodizing &Metal Finishing,Inc. (A) Abrasive Technology Manufacturing, Inc. 687 Industrial Park Drive (B) POB 128 168 Roweland Drive Piney Flats, TN 37686 Johnson City, TN 37601 (423) 538-3406 (423) 232-4700 Ken Williford, General Manager Shala Amiri, General Manager Q' Aluminum Framing Components 3365, 3499 Grinding Wheels 3291 f Accurate Machine Products CoM. (B) Ad-Mat International_Coasters USA,Inc. (B) POB 998, 710 West Walnut Street POB 3724, 2205 Eddie Williams Road Johnson City, TN 37605 Johnson City, TN 37602 (423) 928-8134 Code: I E (423) 434-2373 Code: Kenneth D. Gough, President Kitty Elbers, CEO & Karel Elbers, President Special Machine Components 3599 Die Cut Beverage Coasters 2675 Pressure Vessels 3545 ADPMA (A) Aerojet_Ordinance Tenn..(E) POB 190; 401 Century Court 1367 Old State Route 34 Piney Flats, TN 37686 Jonesborough, TN 37659 (423) 391-8834 (423) 753-1200 Rick Wedgeworth, Plant Manager Kelvin S. Smalley, General Manager Miscellaneous Machine Parts 3399 Depleted Uranium, Metals, Ammunition 3499, 3489, 3483 Aeronautical Accessories, Inc.(C) 441 Industrial Park Road, Piney Flats 167 R wlan Drive (I) POB 3689 Bristol, TN 37652 167 Rowland Drive 3 (423) 538-5111 Code: I E Johnson City, TN 37601 Jeff Shapiro, General Manager (423) 928-8203 Code I E Aeronautical Components&Helicopter Lu Steve Cook, Plant Manager Accessories 3728 Lubrication Systems 3586 Allen, C. M, Inc. (A) http://wwwjcedb.org/industrial/index.php cedb.org/industrial/index.php 04/04/2005 From:MINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRI651 646 4215 04/05/2005 09:45 #004 P.013/015 u� �� S i n � s Sn i A-7 v !/1 1 u5ejt-" —� L a G a��►-� Mzdw-ll D b d b From:MINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRI651 646 4215 09:46 #094 P,014/015 ' \ to/ +2 T-� / �� /�_ [l/� .-- `_______ /� �~ r ~ From:MINNESOTA DIVERSIFIED INDUSTRI651 646 4215 04/05/2005 09:46 #094 P.015/015