HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005.10.17 EDA Packet Or/s1 >,7 o I
AGENDA
CITY OF HUGO
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
MONDAY, OCTOBER 17, 2005 — 8:30 AM
HUGO CITY HALL
8:30 am 1. Call to Order K
8:31 am 2. Roll Call N,; S�ir,,i�✓' fb 6,,,ryi 11a ;Tro
8:32 am 3. Approval of Minutes p
• EDA Meeting of September 19,2005
8:35 am 4. Site Plan Review for Pearson Mechanical Inc
9:00 am 5. Update of October 13, 2005 Meeting of the TIF
Subcommittee
• Review Draft TIF/Downtown Redevelopment Project
Q & A Newsletter
• Approve Proposed Marketing Plan/Schedule of Activities
• Schedule Joint EDA/Council Workshop
Ttf
9:50 am 6. Update on Twin`Cities Community Capital Fund Program
10:00 am 7. Ute on"End Zone Property"
10:10 am 8. Upetring for Hugo Resident to Serve on HRA Board in 2006/
10:20 am 9. Accept Resignation from EDA Member Theresa Charpentier
00 4,4
.Yb
10:30 am 10. Adjournment
�IPr� �'1jOr�lr�{
BACKGROUND MEMO FOR THE EDA MEETING OF
OCTOBER 17, 2005
3. SEPTEMBER 19,2005 EDA MEETING MINUTES
City staff recommends the board approve the minutes for the September 19, 2005 meeting as
presented.
4. SITE PLAN REVIEW FOR PEARSON MECHANICAL INC.
At the July 18, 2005 EDA meeting the EDA recommended that the City sell the 3.3 acre property
located in the Bald Eagle Industrial Park to Pearson Mechanical Inc., owned by Ronald A.
Pearson. Pearson Mechanical Inc. was one of two businesses that were selected to acquire the
City property in the park through the Request for Proposal (RFP)process initiated by the EDA.
Pearson Mechanical Inc. has since submitted a preliminary site plan for review by the EDA as
part of the conditions of approving the final purchase agreement. City staff requests that the EDA
review and comment on the preliminary site plan.
5. UPDATE OF OCTOBER 13,2005 MEETING OF THE TIF SUBCOMMITTEE
City staff, Paul Steinman of Springsted, and the subcommittee,consisting of Mike Granger, Frank
Puleo, and Phil Klein, met on August 23, 2005. Subcommittee member Nick Skarich was unable
to attend. At the last EDA meeting,the subcommittee was directed to work on creating a
marketing plan for the implementation phase of the downtown redevelopment plan and
establishment of the TIF district. The following items were discussed at the subcommittee
meeting: 1.) The proposed timeline and work items to be completed for the marketing plan. 2.)
The content of the draft TIF/downtown redevelopment project Q & A newsletter. 3.) The
proposed meeting dates for a joint EDA/Council educational workshop regarding the marketing
plan. At the meeting, City staff will present to the EDA an overview of the proposed marketing
plan and the schedule of activities to be completed. Staff requests that the EDA review the
proposed timeline and the draft Q &A newsletter and provide staff with feedback on how to
proceed. Staff also recommends scheduling a joint Council/EDA workshop in order to review
and make final decisions on the future direction of the proposed downtown TIF district. The
proposed time and date for the joint EDA/Council workshop is Monday, November 21, 2005, at
8:30 am, at the EDA's next regularly scheduled meeting.
6. UPDATE ON TWIN CITIES COMMUNITY CAPITAL FUND PROGRAM
At the September 19, 2005,joint EDA/Council meeting Scott Martin from the Twin Cites
Community Capital Fund (TCCCF) gave a presentation about the organization and the benefits
members receive from participating in the fund to the EDA and Council. The TCCCF is a
nonprofit economic development loan fund. Communities that join the fund are eligible for low
interest loans, gap financing, and other financial incentives. The EDA and Council thanked Scott
Martin for coming to the meeting and suggested that the EDA and the Council evaluate the
materials in order and make a recommendation at the next EDA meeting on whether or not to
participate in the program. Springsted, the City's financial advising firm, has prepared some
background information on the fund. Staff suggests that the EDA discuss whether or not the City
should consider becoming a member of the TCCCF at this time.
7. UPDATE ON"END ZONE PROPERTY"
Terry Montpetit has entered into a contract to purchase the former `End Zone Property'
located at 13891 Forest Blvd. He intends to remodel the existing building and open a
restaurant/bar. City staff will give an update to the EDA on the recent discussions with
Terry Montpetit.
8. OPENING FOR HUGO RESIDENTS TO SERVE ON HRA BOARD IN 2006
Washington County Commissioner Dennis Hegberg requested that a public announcement
be made that there will be a vacancy on the Washington County Housing and
Redevelopment Authority Board in 2006. Any resident interested in serving on the Board,
with the exception of Council members, should contact Washington County Commissioner
Dennis Hegberg or the City of Hugo for an application.
9. ACCEPT RESIGNATION FROM EDA MEMBER THERESA CHARPENTIER
At its September 19, 2005 meeting, the EDA discussed the request from Commissioner Theresa
Charpentier to seek a replacement for her on the TIF Subcommittee due to a change in her work
schedule. The EDA accepted her resignation and the City Council committee voted unanimously
to select and appoint Phil Klein as her replacement. Since that time, staff has had the opportunity
to discuss with Theresa her future on the EDA. Theresa has submitted a letter of resignation to
the City for her service on the EDA, citing a change in her work schedule, which does not allow
her the flexibility to attend regular meetings. At the October 17, 2005, city staff will recommend
Council accept the resignation from Theresa Charpentier from the EDA and publicly thank her
for her service to the City of Hugo. City staff further recommends that the Council direct staff to
either advertise for this vacancy on the EDA or contact one of the remaining thirteen applicants
who originally interviewed for the position in order to determine their interest in serving out
Theresa's term on the EDA.
s
Agenda Number ,
YCIi
711v
1
TO: Planning Commission
FROM: Andrew Gitzlaff, Community Development Intern, through Bryan Bear,
Community Development Director.
SUBJECT: Pearson Mechanical Inc. Site Plan Approval to allow for the
construction of a 45,000 square foot warehouse/office building on Lot 1,
Block 1 of Bald Eagle Industrial Park, 5`h Addition.
DATE: October 6, 2005, for the Planning Commission Meeting on October 13,
2005
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial/Industrial
ZONING: General Industrial (I-3)
REVIEW DEADLINE: November 15, 2005
1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting site plan approval to allow for the construction of a 45,000 square
foot building on property located on the northeast corner of the intersection of Fenway Boulevard
and Fenway Boulevard Circle in the Bald Eagle Industrial Park. Ronald Pearson of Pearson
Mechanical Inc. purchased the property legally described as Lot 1 Block 1 of Bald Eagle
Industrial Park 5 1 Addition from the City. According to the agreement, Person Mechanical Inc.
has until September 2006 to construct a building on the site. The building is intended to serve as
a warehouse and office complex to house the headquarters of Pearson Mechanical Inc. &
Associates which is a mechanical contractor company specializing in HVAC system
construction. Warehousing and related office space are permitted uses in the general industrial
district provided that the office space does not exceed more than 50% of the total building square
footage. The proposed building will consist of 33,800 square feet of warehouse space and 9,600
square feet of office space. Part of the office and warehouse space may be leased out to another
contracting company.
Page 2
12. LEVEL OF DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING
The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the
proposed project complies with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. If
it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan.
3. CONTEXT: 4*
A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning
The properties to the north, south, and east of the site consist of warehousing and light
manufacturing industrial uses, are zoned general industrial, and are within the Bald Eagle
Industrial Park. The properties to the west consist of attached townhomes and are zoned as a
planned unit development (PUD). The City's Comprehensive Land Use Guide Plan designates
the Bald Eagle Industrial park area for commercial/industrial uses.
B. Natural Characteristics of Site
The subject property is relatively flat, contains mainly upland areas, and natural vegetation.
There are no structures on the property.
4. ANALYSIS:
The application complies with the ordinance standards as follows:
Building Setbacks
The City's Comprehensive Land Use regulations require 30-foot front and rear yard setbacks and
40-foot side yard setbacks. As proposed, the building complies with all applicable setback
requirements.
Parking
The Comprehensive Land Use Regulations provide specific parking standards based on the use
of the building. Since the proposed building contains both warehouse and office uses separate
formulas should be used to calculate the total required amount of parking spaces required for
each use. Based on the proposed 35,400 square feet of warehouse space and the 9,600 square
feet of office space, the ordinance requires 75 parking spaces for customers and employees. The
proposed site plan identifies the construction of 48 parking spaces with 27 additional parking
spaces identified as "proof of parking." Staff considers the proposed amount of parking spaces
adequate for the operation of the current occupants. Pearson Mechanical Inc. does not intend on
maximizing the entire building immediately and much of the office space indicated on the floor
plan is reserved for future growth. The additional 27 spaces may be needed at a later date if
Pearson Mechanical expands its operations or if building is occupied by another business. The
2
Page 3
staff has included a condition in the approving resolution requiring the applicant to construct the
additional 27 parking spaces if parking demand increases or a parking problem arises.
Building Height
The zoning ordinance limits building height to 50 feet. The proposed building is between 33 and
36 feet high, and complies with the ordinance.
Building Coverage and Lot Coverage
The ordinance limits building coverage to 40% and lot coverage to 80%. The proposed site plan
complies with the coverage requirements.
Lighting
The proposed site plan does not indicate exterior lighting for the building or site. The attached
resolution includes a condition requiring a lighting plan for any exterior lighting prior to the
issuance of a building permit. All lighting will comply with the City's exterior lighting standards
and the restrictive covenants for the park which requires all light fixtures to be shield and contain
full cutoffs in order to direct light away form adjoining properties and public streets.
Landscaping
The applicant has submitted an extensive landscape plan that includes, 1) 18 overstory deciduous
trees of 4 different species, 2) 21 coniferous trees of 2 different species, 3) 18 ornamental trees of
3 different species, and 4) 210 shrubs of 8 different species. The amount, type, size, and
proposed location of plantings comply with the requirements of the landscape ordinance. The
applicant also intends to preserve a grove of existing trees on the north end of the site and grove
of existing trees on the east end of the site. The proposed landscaping arrangement and the
existing grove of trees on the east end of the site should help to screen the loading area of the
building from the surrounding properties and Fenway Boulevard Circle. Staff will continue to
work with the applicant to ensure that the proposed landscaping adequately provides year round
screening of the loading area.
Screening
The proposed building will not include any exterior storage except for the overnight parking of
commercial vehicles to the rear of the building. The trash and recycling receptacles will be
enclosed in a permanent structure constructed of the same building materials and matching colors
as the principle building. The applicant has indicated that there will be some roof-top
mechanical units on the building. The comprehensive land use regulations and the restrictive
covenants for the park require the screening of all mounted mechanical equipment from
surrounding uses and public right-of-ways. The parapet walls should be utilized to completely
screen roof top units or a treatment compatible to the building architecture. The attached
resolution includes a condition requiring the applicant to provide a screening plan including
3
Page 4
prospective sight lines from adjacent public right-of-ways for the roof-top equipment prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
Architecture and building materials
The exterior of the building will be constructed of precast raked concrete panels with two smooth
concrete horizontal bands-that will extend around the building. The City's requirements for
exterior materials and the restrictive covenants for the industrial park allow architecturally
enhanced concrete panels as an acceptable material. Additional smooth concrete accents are
shown below each window sill. The raked panels will be gray toned and the bands and accents
will be white toned.
The proposed elevations indicate additional architectural enhancements to the front of the
building including three outward extending entry canopies, with overhanging cornices that
extends 3 feet above the top of the parapet and 35 windows. The entry canopy will be
constructed with EIFS and painted white and the widow trim will be painted black. The north
side of the building includes a series of windows and smooth concrete accent panels and an
employee entrance. However, the south side of the building, which is oriented towards Fenway
Boulevard Circle, does not indicate any window or architectural elements to break up the face of
the wall besides the concrete accent bands. It is in staffs' opinion that the applicant should do
more to improve the appearance of the south side of the building by adding windows, additional
accent panels and colors, or similar architectural improvements.
Signage
The proposed site plan does not indicate signage, except for a monument sign at the corner of
Fenway Boulevard and Fenway Boulevard Circle. The applicant has indicated to staff the desire
to add externally lit wall signs to the face of the entry canopies. The Staff will continue to work
with the applicant to ensure compliance with the City's sign standards and the development
covenants of the industrial park.
Street access
The proposed site plan indicates two driveway access points on Fenway Boulevard Circle. The
driveway closest to the intersection of Fenway Boulevard and Fenway Boulevard Circle will be
designated as an automobile access and the driveway farthest from the intersection will be
designated for truck access. At the request of the city engineer, the automobile access has been
moved to within 60 feet of the intersection to eliminate the undesirable "S" curve in the drive
isle. The access configuration meets City Ordinance provisions and reasonable access spacing
guidelines.
Ponding and stormwater management
The proposed site plan indicates two infiltration basins on the east side of the site and additional
stormwater treatment and storage is provided downstream of the site within existing regional
4
Page 5
ponds. The applicant is working with the City Engineer to address issues related to infiltration
and stormwater management. Staff has included a condition of approval requiring the applicant
to have a grading and stormwater management plan approved by the City Engineer prior to the
issuance of a building permit.
4. CONCLUSIONS:
Staff finds that the proposal meets all the requirements necessary for the City to approve a site
plan as outlined in the City's Comprehensive Land Use regulations, if the appropriate conditions
are attached to the resolution.
5. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff suggests that the Planning Commission direct the applicant to improve the appearance of
the south elevation of the building. Staff recommends approval of the application subject to the
conditions listed in the attached resolution.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Resolution Approving the Site Plan
2. Memo from City Engineer
3. Location Map
4. Site Graphics
5
RESOLUTION 2005-
APPROVING A SITE PLAN FOR R. A. PEARSON MECHANICAL INC. FOR
PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF FENWAY BOULEVARD NORTH AND
NORTH OF FENWAY BOULEVARD CIRCLE NORTH
WHEREAS, R. A. Pearson Mechanical Inc. has requested approval of a site plan to allow
for the construction of a 45,000 square foot building and related site improvements on the
property legally described as follows:
Lot 1 Block 1 of Bald Eagle Industrial Park, 5`h Addition
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the site plan at a duly called Public
Hearing and recommends approval, and;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the
request by R. A. Pearson Mechanical Inc. for a site plan, subject to the following
conditions:
1. A site plan is approved to allow the construction of a 45,000 square foot building, in
accordance with the plans received on October 6, 2005, except as amended by this
resolution.
2. The applicant shall comply with the engineer's memo dated October 6, 2005, and
submit a revised grading and stormwater management for approval by the City
Engineer prior to issuance of a building permit.
3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall provide a screening plan
including prospective sight lines from adjacent public right-of-ways. The rooftop
mechanical units shall be screened completely by the parapet wall or a treatment
compatible to the building architecture.
4. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the applicant shall submit a lighting plan
for any exterior lighting. The plan shall include cut-sheets indicating that all lighting
will contain cut-off fixtures and will comply with the City's exterior lighting
standards.
5. The applicant shall submit a revised landscape plan detailing the year round screening
proposed for the loading area.
6. All exterior signage shall comply with the ordinance standards.
7. The applicant shall construct the 27 additional parking spaces designated on the site
plan as "proof of parking" if parking demand increase or a parking problem arises.
Adopted and passed this , 2005.
Fran Miron, Mayor
ATTEST:
Mary Ann Creager, City Clerk
A
WSB
&Associates,Inc. Infrastructure 1 Engineering 1 Planning 1 Construction 701 Xenia Avenue South
Suite 300
Minneapolis,MN 55416
Tel:763-541-4800
October 6, 2005 Fax:763-541-1700
Mr. Bryan Bear
Community Development Director
City of Hugo
14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North
Hugo, MN 55038
Re: Site Plan Review
Pearson Mechanical/BEIP 5`h Addition
WSB Project No. 1574-72
Dear Mr. Bear:
We have reviewed the proposed site plan for the Pearson's Mechanical Facility to be located
within the Bald Eagle Industrial Park 5`h Addition. Our review comments pertain to the original
plan submittal;however, we are aware that the applicant will be submitting a revised site plan
based on the discussion at our meeting with them on October 4, 2005.
Our comments on this application are as follows:
1. Utility service is available to the site from within the roadway right of way along the
southern border of the property.
2. The westerly property access is currently located 100 feet from Fenway Boulevard. The
access is currently configured with an undesirable "S"curve into the site. As we
discussed at the meeting with the applicant, the access can be as close as 60 feet to
Fenway Boulevard in accordance with City Ordinance provisions and reasonable access
spacing guidelines. This should allow for a much-improved access configuration.
3. The plan currently includes parking area/drive aisle within the existing easement along
the north property boundary. As discussed with the applicant, these improvements will
need to be removed from the easement to allow for drainage that is consistent with the
overall grading plan for the site.
4. Standard storm water treatment and storage is provided downstream of the site within
existing regional pond(s). With this in mind, there are no requirements to provide a
treatment/storage pond within the site.
5. Storm water management rules have changed since the original development of the
property in the late 1990's. With this in mind, the applicant will need to provide
infiltration facilities within the property based on the prevailing soil conditions. The
plans currently include an infiltration area along the east property boundary; however, it
Minneapolis 1 St. Cloud
Equal Opportunity Employer
Mr. Bryan Bear
October 6,2005
Page 2
is my understanding that the infiltration area can be smaller in size based on the
prevailing soils within the property. This will allow for more flexibility within the site,
and may allow the applicant to save additional trees along the east property line.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this issue. We look forward to reviewing the
revised site plan once it is submitted. If you have any questions or items you wish to discuss,
you can contact me at 763-287-7192.
Sincerely,
WSB &Associates, Inc.
Jay Kennedy, P.E.
City Engineer
jk
cc: Scott Anderson, City of Hugo, Senior Engineering Technician (e-mail only)
Chris Petree, City of Hugo, Public Works Director(e-mail only)
Mark Erichson, WSB &Associates, Inc. (e-mail only)
Pearson Mechanical
Site Plan
-------------
........... .. ........
LZ
................... -------
........... 4i,40�
--------------------------
�x
......................
--------------- .............................. ..........
........................ .......
....................
..........................
j.....................
...................... ................. i.
t-7
71
F
-----------------
Site
.......................... ....... ---------
.............. .. .............
---------------
........--------- ------------------------------------------------------------
.............i 1344
.................
...............
..................................... ........................................-------------------------------------------
.... .....................................................
...........
---------- --------- ..........
..,....i...w... I �.'
........... .......... ............
^_..__,� N
Created for the
W Planning Commission
L
Meeting October 13, 2005
S
jafvert
I mueller
C'+�
architects
' Inc.
l5W An--&w W
wn,�ns
ii "n`9no MN-1
R,anc 95:39]-Sa01
Faz 9Y-B9SSori
ME'wrw x.Mren.n.r
PEARSON
PROPOSED SITE AND BUILDING FOR: MECHANICAL
PROPOSED BUILDING
PEARSON MECHANICAL - TREES_ — N8�00'36'W TREES HUGO,MN
1 SERVICES, INC. — — — — — 48 —— 20'DRAINAGE EASEMENT
H U G O M N / / - — —— — — —— 40 BUILDING SETBAN_]
, / / /
i I
cl 26
23 37
Site 22 4 y.
1 ,
36
gerevisions:
30,000 TOTAL I^ date: description
7,200 OFFICE I I 29 AUG 05 O—nrAi-
22,800 WAREHOUSE �I I 65EP05 sanlwRA
Add13 SEP 05 —�ring
8
Al 45,000 BUILDING 27 {SEP OS nathh sldRek��e'°spa es to
7 sutanided 4,Planning 5
\ DRIVE-IN 1s sEPm cft wand
DOOR I w oe OCT os i'lannlrg s1a6 ne.abn4
o
TRAS
ENCLOSURE I I o
t VICINITY MAP /4/ I
CO NB SME NORTH M%IENT � 15,000 TOTAL
,AGN O 2,400 OFFICE I I
\� AUTO 12,600 WAREHOUSE
SHEET INDEX: CTs ENTRY
CO COVER SHEET AND PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN �` 47 DRIVE-IN
Cl CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY
DOOR
i
C2 GRADING PLAN N q TRAfC I I
C3 UTILITY PLAN
L1 LANDSCAPE PLAN
Al PRELIMINARY PLAN AND ELEVATIONS
PRELIMINARY
Site Squen Footage Coverage(P.Poaed) SM Square Footage Coverage(Prod or Parking) F \ _ — — —— _ / �•�` NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION
Square square -canta sits SF F
Footage Perceaage d Sils SF Foorege P `^/I, \\ IRUCN
slteY 143,676 S. 143,676 v9 \ ENTRY
Wldl6�
Brp Footprint 35.000 24.3 BWMing Footprint 35,000 24.3 I' �
✓IDHardsurfece 39,200 27.3 Hadsc�e run44,169 30.7 �
Total 74,269 Sims Trial 79,169 55.0 C/� ��_ _ .........__.__-_.-.._
Perking Cakxilatlona(par zoning cods)
ONITEO PROPERTIES
Square Fm." Employees Required parking Provided parkkg
Footage apa— spaces
Warehousing(pass V)V) 45,000 5+(,Par 2 enro) 50 (25.5)30 46 35,000 SF
Warehoeeing(ClassV) 45,000 min,per150GSF NA 30 46 PRELIMINARY SITE PLAN SCHEMATIC SITE
z
Parking Calculations(per Planning StaN) CO SCALE 1:30
DESIGN
square FomwW Required parking p,oVdadproolaparldng space, NORTH
Footage spaces
Waret—Ing(Cl—V) 35,400 1 per 150GSF 24
date: 24 AUG OS
Otr-(classvli) 9,60° 1per.F+3 51
Taal 45.000 75 75 drawn by: mrh
checked: spm
comm.no.: 205238
sheet number:
C 0
V
NOTE: �.� Y ly- , Y ,Y,-,r , r PLANTING NOTES u
1. ALL SHRUB BEDS SHALL HAVE 4' OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. / G EXISTING TREES TO REMAIN ~y Y Y\�m 1.ALL PUNTS MUST BE HEALTHY,VIGOROUS MATERIAL,FREE OF 17.USE ANP-DESICCANT(WiLTPRUF OR APPROVED EQUAL)ON �
PESTS AND DISEASE AND BE CONTAINER GROWN OR BALLED AND DECIDUOUS PLANTS MOVED IN LEAF AND FOR EVERGREENS MOVED Of
l/I.MtiAA�''/-- .�/ BURLRPED AS INDICATED IN THE PLANT UST. ANYTIME. APPLY AS PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTION.ALL w
2. TWO ROWS OF SOD TYPICAL BACK OF CURB ALL SEEDED AREAS./ SOD SOD LINE 2.ALL TREES MUST BE STRAIGHT TRUNKED AND FULL HEADED AND PROTECCTION DURING NS SHALL BW RR YTM PERIOD.IN THE LATE FALL FOR WINTER N W
MEET ALL REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED.
d2 18.PLANTING SOL FOR TREES,SHRUBS AND GROUND MOUN COVERS:
3.THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES I THE RIGHT TO REJECT FRIABLE LOAM CONTAINING A LIBERAL AMOUNT O HUMUS J
3. BLACK POLY EDGER FOR ALL SHRUB BEDS. / P2Q / ANY PUNTS WHICH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, Z
`` > AND CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING VIGOROUS PLANT GROWTH.IT SHALL <
SJ ,> DURING,OR AFTER INSTALLATION. COMPLY WITH MNDOT SPECIFICATION 3877 TYPE B SELECT TOPSOIL H- w J
` / 4.NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PUNT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED MIXTURE SHALL BE FREE FROM HRDPACK SUBSOIL,STONES, U O
V\ 9 UNLESS APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. CHEMICALS.NOXIOUS WEEDS,ETC.SOIL MIXTURE SHALL HAVE A PH w a a
/ � /`� S D BETWEEN 6.1 AND 7.5 AND 10-10-10 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF 3 Z Z O L'i
JP /� A SOD 5.ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE"AMERICAN POUNDS PER CUBIC YARD.IN PLANTING BEDS INCORPORATE THIS Q Z a-
/
Cv / � 3 STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK,-ANSI-Z60,LATEST EDITION,OF MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BED BY ROTOTILUNG IT INTO THE <
INV ° THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN,INC.AND SHALL TOP 12"OF SOIL z CL U
J CONSTITUTE MINIMUM OUAUTY REQUIREMENTS FOR PUNT O N
/ SOD T EIT 19.ALL PUNTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR ONE COMPLETE U 0
�O / 9 MATERIALS. GROWING SEASON(APRIL 1-NOVEMBER 1),UNLESS OTHERWISE W Ocl Z
-L 6.EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED SPECIFIED.THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER THE FULL COST OF c = W <
Q SOD \ pF TO THE DRIP LINE FROM ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC,STORAGE OF REPLACEMENT INCLUDING LABOR AND PLANTS. c J
MATERIALS ETC.WITH 4'HT.ORANGE PLASTIC SAFETY FENCING
ADEOUATELY'SUPPORTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS 6'O.C.MAXIMUM 20.CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT Z
LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNED DELIVERY. THE CONTRACTOR
/ 0 M O SPACING. SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN O
7.ALL PLANT MATERIALS QUANTITIES.SHAPES OF BEDS AND ADVANCE OF BEGINNING PLANT INSTALLATION. N
RESPONSIB
LOCATION SHOWN OMSHOWN ARE RPRO%IMATE.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE
A ° LE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING BEDS AT 21.SEASONS/TKAE OF PLANTING: NOTE THE CONTRACTOR MAY
A 3 SPACING SHOWN AND ADJUSTED TO CONFORM TO THE EXACT ELECT TO PUNT IN OFF-SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HIS/HER RISK.
2 $ SA M CONDITIONS OF THE SITE THE ARCHITECT SHALL APPROVE THE DECIDUOUS POrTEO PLANTS: Q
/ STAKING LOCATION OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS PRIOR TO APRIL i-JUNE 1; AUG.21-NOV.1
$
O INSTALLATION. DECIDUOUS B&B:
\F� N PM ) ° 8.ALL TREES MUST BE PLANTED,MULCHED.AND STARED AS ERGS Po�uP ANTS21-NOV.1
PF SHOWN IN THE DETAILS. APRIL 1-JUNE 1; AUG.21-OCT.I
A $ 9.ALL PLANTING AREAS MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCHED AS SPECIFIED. APRIRV'FRGREEN B30: AUG.21-SEPT.15 IZ:_� e v h
66 3 10.MULCH: SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH,CLEAN AND FREE Qi
NOXIOUS NEEDS OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL,IN ALL MASS 22 MAN7ENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTON y h b
rj ° PUNTING BEDS AND FOR TREES,UNLESS INDICATED AS ROCK OF THE WORK IS N PUCE.PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED )
4, PM ANO MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF PLANTINGS IS l O n
/ I PRIOR ON DRAWINGS,SUBMIT SAMPLE O LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ��INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE,AND FLOUTING IS ' h`p`I'V
PRIOR TO DELIVERY N. UTE FOR APPROVAL DELIVER MULCH ON ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE.MAINTENANCE SHALL °+��
/ ` SA J I DAY OF INSTALLATION. USE 4"FOR TREES.SHRUB BEDS.AND 3" c u h P7
SOD / FOR PERENMAL/GROUND COVER BEDS,UNLESS OTHERWISE
INCLUDE WATERING, I CULTIVATING. O PROPER
GADS D DEAD C c
$ 3 MATERIALS,RE-SETTING PUNTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING
/ < FfE=934.00 oco DIRECTED- PLANTS S A PLUMB ENATION.AFTER ACCEPTANCE,THE OTHER% P e
/ A 11.THE PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANT SCHEDULE 1F SMALL ASSUME ALL C MAINTENANCE RTO BE ESPOES.HOWEVER.THE c o
3 DISCREPANCIES EXIST.THE SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING C t~
/ 3 OVER THE PLANTING NOTES AND GENERAL NOTES, THE TREES PLUMB THOVGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. O N 4
TO 12.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES 23.ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES,TURNS BROWN,OR DEFOLIATES FT
AND PLAN71NG SOL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK)SHALL BE PROMPTLY p y'
/\ \ I'�� THE PLAN. VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANT REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED WITH MATERIAL OF THE SAME
5
M u SCHEDULE. SPECIES,OUANTITY,AND SIZE AND MEETING ALL PLAIT LIST C
` 13.LONG-TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON-SITE SPECIFICATIONS l
/ PF WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 24.WATERING MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE WHICH WILL 0
THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PUNTS ONCE A WEEK.IN EXTREMELY HOT, JC
/ ` ) $ F I 14.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS.PLANTERS AND DRY WEATHER,WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF LL
/ 6 '� $ TO BUILDINGS CLEAN AND UNSTAINED.ALL PEDESTRIAN AND VEHICLE HEAT STRESS SUCH AS WILTING LEAVES,CHECK MOISTURE UNDER g
\�\ T6O ; ACCESS 70 BE MAINTAINED THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION PERIOD.ALL MULCH PRIOR TO WATERING TO DETERMINE N®.CONTRACTOR SHALL LOA
$ WASTES SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE ANY PUNT MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER.
STOCK NOT PUNTED ON DAY OF DELIVERY SHALL BE HEELED IN
A J AND WATERED UN M INSTALLATION.PLANTS NOT MAINTAINED IN THIS 25.CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WRITING,A FINALIL
/ SJ MANNER WILL BE REJECTED.ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACIUTYIES ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION.
6 SOD 3 ] SHALL BE REPAVED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE.
B )) 26.SEE SHEET X FOR PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM. ft
�i.-
53 F 15.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING RECEIVE p
Gv 9 6 MTI ALL APPLICABLE CODES.REGULATIONS AND PERMITS SOL.SEED27.ALL S MULCH,TURBED ARNDA WATER UNTILEAS TO BE LAAOHEALTH Y •TOP
.
5 AND OF 7^°
GV T D GOVERNING THE WORK. GLASS IS OBTAINED. _
F TO 16.LOCATE RD VERIFY ALL UTIUTHE_%INCLUDING IRRIGATION L1NE5,
9 $ >N WITH THE OWNER FOR PROPRIETARY UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE
m O ONE CALL AT 4S4-0002(TWIN CITIES METRO AREA)OR
800-252-1 CTOR S(GREATER MINNESOTA)O (HOURS BEFORE DIGGING. o O O
\ CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND W Y Y
REPAIR O ANY DAMAGES TO SAME NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE u1
5 53 ARCHITECT OF ANY CONVICTS TO FACILITATE PUNT RELOCATION.
] o
TEL
Q FFo o
LANDSCAPE LEGEND
Al
0 0 0 <
7� ° SEED KEr BorANKx wME co1NKXH TUNE sT:F Icor Km. RDMAAKs
Y 4 SOD ° EXISTING TELIIECINIOU6IRM c
A S / Y
\ V O _ ��7 TREES TO
cer REMAIN L • ) AX treemanil'Si-' SIENNA GLEN MAPLE 2.5' BET 6 a m
V�N\ uoc�
\ ��O S O Amelonchier z gm di lom AMS E SERVICFBURR1
2.5' BB 3
'Autumn BrilTgnce' 3 mn c
Betula nigra RIVER BIRCH 2.5' BB 3 CLUMP FORM
tE �
AA�� GV us Jy Fminamericom'Junginger AUTUMN PURPLE ASH 2.5' B8 6
1.SCARIFY BOTTOMND SIDES OF HOLEMOTE GUY ASSEMBLY OPTOAL\ �� �O,Q �/ / T O
ANIn o
E PRIOR TO PLANTING BUT CONTRACTOR FULL DDNFEAOUS TREES
2 TRY OUT DFM WOOD AND WEAK AFD/OR T„EE IN A PLUMB O o Y mo
DEFORMED TWIGS.DQE CUT A(FADER. P`e III-densato BLACK HILLS SPRUCE 6' HT. 9
04.3ffi PAM CUTS.SFE SPECS REGARgNG
THE OIRA710N OF TIE \ � 9 aut � c .
PRUNING O ALL OAKS. GUARANTEE PERIDD Kn
A 3.SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED HAXINE GUY ASSFLBIY-16"POLYPROPYLENE /`+� t�,c c c o 0
SOL OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED OR POLYEIMENE(40 MU 1-1/2' ♦►- t Pinus nigro AUSTRIAN PINE 6' HE.
BACIOli SOL NSUl1 PIANF 50 THE
WIDE STR4P(TPP)DOUBLE SIRMD 10
ROOT H/RE K AT OR LN TO 2' GA WIFE 2-7"ROLLED STEEL POSTS \
ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE (MbDOT 3401)•100'O.C.(SFE
STAKING DMGRAM) 1.SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR ` ! ' KIIOWMEIRAL TREES
4.RACE BANE N PLANTING HOLE TO PLANTING
WITH BURLAP AND WIFE BASKET, COORDINATE STAKING TO INSURE i� f Matas'P-irifwa PRAIRIFIRE CRR 1.5" BO 9
IF USED).INTACT. BACKFILL WITMH UNFORM ORIENTATION O GUY LINES 2 TERM OUT DEAD WOOD AND WEAK AND/DR SOIS'PLUMB AND S M7I1 BASKiILt �J
APPROXIMATELY 12"O THE TOP OF AND STAKES, DEFORMED TWIGS.DO CUT A LEADER.QQ -
ROMALL.WATER%ANF. REMOVE TOP r,W-1\ tW PANT CUTS. 6.WATER TD SME AND FILL
1/3 OF THE BASKET HI THE TOP TWO 1.5 BB 6
3.SEF PLANT ON UNDISTURBED(UTNE 501.OR RDS. O Maim'Thunderchild' THUNDERCHILD CRAB
HORIZONTAL RINGS.ALL BURLS 5 1807.
GREATER. REMOVE Nl_BURLAP AND THOROUGHLY PLA COMPACTED OTBACKFILLFEAR SOL IN WATER WI. TWO GMHOURS O
NAILS FROM 70P 1/3 O THE BALL STAKING DIAGHAAI UP TO PLANT 50 HE ROOT FLARE E.AT OR SUFFICIENT
T WHIRRING LY ST BE
REMOVE AUL TWINE. UP TO 2"ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE. ROOT IE L TO THOROUGHLY SATURATE
� ROOF BALL AND PLANTING HOLE �L Syringo roticulota JAPANESE TREE LILAC 1.5" BB 3
5.PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITH BACKFLL 4 TREE WRAP FROM 0 FIRST BRUNCH CONTAINERW MULCH UNE 4.REMOVE PLASTIC.MEM,WOOD OR FIBER B.PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 �F
SqLCONTAINERAID SCORE OUTSIDE OF SOL MASS
PERFORATED SlR PVC COLLAR WITH BURP KNIFE PLANTS CAN BE PUNTED N HOURS O TE SECOND WATERING SHRUBS6.OUSTER 70 WILE PLANTS AND FILL A DEGRADABLE POT.THE CONTAINER MUST BE SLIT UNLESS SOIL MOISTURE IS Y
VOIDS. 4'-6"SHREDDED BARK MULCH VERTICALLY AT 6"INTERNALS. EXCESSIVE BT Berberis thunbero'Rose Glow ROSE GLOW BARBERRY /2 COM. 18
7.WATER WITHIN TWO MONS OF DUSTING GRADE 3"-4'SHREDDED BARK MULCH PA P..abies'Nid'dormis' BIRD'S NESE SPRUCE /2 COM. 17
INSTALLATION. WATERING MUST BE OR AS SPECIFIED.PULL MULCH
SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SATURATE PLANTING SOIL MIXTURE(SEE SPEC.) MULCH BACK FROM STEM.
ROOT BALL AND PLATING HOLE. - MNMUM 1/2 WIDTH Di ROOT BALL PM Pinus mugo pumilb MUGO PINE /2 CONE. 6 w
S.PLACE MULCH W'fIFIN 48 UND6TIIRBRD OR STABILIZED GRADE
I PF PotmUlb/Micosa'Corono6on Triumph' CORONATION 7R1AFH PoTENTIl1A /2 CONE. 51 p o
HOURS O THE SECOND WATERING SlIBS01LS .1141-
LLP c
UNLESS SOL MOISTURE 5 $ SA Spiroea.1141 a JAPANESE WARE SPIREA /2 COM. 24
_ _ OR ROOTMA55
EXCESSIVE NC SOIL MIXTURE(SEE SPEC) 0 30 60 si spiraeo pponico'Merty.., DAKOTA GOLDCHARM SPIREA /2 CONT. 32 _
UNDISTURBED OR STABILIZED SUBSOILSSHEET NUMBER REV.
A DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL sJN spiraea iapani�a'Neaa Flash' NEON FASH SP RU �z COM. 24
Nor ro scA¢ �SHRUB & CONTAINER PLANTING DETAIL SCALE IN FEET To I Thaw«ideotoliis'Heti Midget' I HETI MIDGET ARBORVITAE /z COM. 44 L1 A
Nor ro swc
MFRA FILE f 15575
�\TRO.f<M\Wur553\ep4AxD5CAVFWRLWMr\t55rYt0i 0.urD-�+Er�e.q
\ g
y
�pp O
pp$$ C
AH a° \
>Rm �< \
AMP %
gig i
,934_ at
\\
a /
bg g
Sig-
1
9'8 I \
ou
.00
gJld° �� / / C) � \�
O N
I/ I /' \ S� l \ /\ t /\ I
1 /
I 4 I -------- a� ze.,ec
1 •cb \/ �\ \
I
ISI x.00
�WR sw \I I o
W W �zil,,, \\\\
o ��
I I r r rrWor �i Ir1 \ —0�6— —
I I
it 1. Illr� At b,
—
/ I I aliei,iWraWYsili�ilt.AlaY rd ,.—�. \ ) � �'
I � WW,YYnii,WnYnYIeWYi+.r.■ �, `_—v
ileihWat�ie16 W"on■r W r.i,
I WW ir:i,iriteT■iWWir,■.r._r. _--- -- �> �� \ n / �e�
r ,hb ii,ipf6f616WWar uA— -- / I „ (�
99 I I rr ii
1 I I i Wii iiiiiii�ifitY.r•�t' — iii I�1 .�w of � I
1 1 ■:r r`k�rrii ir�riiiiWr•4 rer.� �ikr I _ � � c„
i sw■ it
so I* iia If R��aaiiWYLW a'ri Y w o
1 i idiWi r=Wr,lLii .r•snr •r iwWiiWwr Wr IN�Yn
At IN d ""1a r 'ie ie s r■r.r,r ra W i— o
I i f fir i,ie W.
AW" r: W Ilk■,■■.■,W.■r r
1 I / ii iWi r it WWiirr■ iiwr.■ r it r i i i tb
I\ i rr W ipi ,rr iWro' low,
I1 `' \ \\ I W \ r Yo� • rh Yw ■r ,�� �i; M. Y,rr. ,w v _� �s
1 I I \ I W i ik i rr W m W rr r i is iia i aw as w�-YR it W J'cy
t W it irk Ile YY ik rn in W rr Wr i Wa Yh
1 \ I \ 6 1111 r+ W iu ' W ih is ',iia iiA �I,W" r is O (n
+irr,W r i ia, how
—
1 1 $ \ rr ra ra r lrr 10 ik r r
I, a sw i rr r,' 61 s x Z
III \ '* •i� 'o ?e �' W. r r�r c � � G7
I I I I o??
4 �
<
\ / _ —
\
\ / —934—_-------�^�\ �\
\
O \`
\
I I I
q9
41ym< xam—c r�ri�����A ,,�-••rr�•n p
NZK J=AprVgVrq!r1 M
SNC nn 0�� M >
=pN7 gg�m nn z A�
kioy A .— #
wzzx—,'rCrCtJrr�� oCz
2
o�� LL
m F
z
N Q
ii I 1
a ii
i
I I M
0
Revisions I hereby certify that this plan was prepared Designed MCA
wo. By Ramarka by me o<vender my direct supervision and that Engineering•Planning•Surveying PEARSON MECHANICAL SERVICE
C7 i I am a duly L sed Professional Engineer Drawn NCS
IV under the law }!q Rote of Minnesota. �� !4800 28th Arinne, Suite 140 HUGO, MINNESOTA
�C/ / Date 9/15/05 p/
`/ ymouth, Minnesota,55447
Si ^°tare Checked MCA phone 78J/476-6010 UNITED PROPERTIES
Name: MARK AND MCCombSFrdnkRoos fox 76J/476-85J2
Date: License #23450 Approved MC
Associates,Inc. GRADING PLAN
Q
a"s SLa
NA
£, 2 om �>
MU A V� \
a �>
a
? € gI99
Oil �
A-
0 4 0� d'y4 0 J0•A� \
7 `" N \ a wgp4 ACo H f
pp rTi a � f
La
6 c +� xsJJo A�z 10 \
�S a�❑g; `n arm s>oy / Ao
`�
,B
t J S. --
_
JAa�M
o �q L rj \ .�� s/n(fA
(�A FgSTF�'( rv,9
a 'e°6 / maPti aaoaPi
'f'q�ejs
66
��w4u A 'Pn
71
-
x�
x< r xa JJ 0 �e TI
€ux NDN asm �
� o
I99 JJ u m
V
1 � o
z v M V V.
\ N N S v
\ ° 8,
me Ao
w + m N
g
\ -"IB'RCP95 C
o T
EB
%c� �4�b� �8 o JJ >•�8"�
\= e
^z UYi
�XXAA'Qn`�5B M
A
s Vl
r:>4-9-
O
yZ D 4 fyy 9-
(/A� r.IA Vl
V=n
m �
0
n q
m qV V
H
a1
111
YJR evisionS I hereby certify that this plan was prepared Designed MCA
Na. Dat. By Renarks by me or under my direct supervision and that Engineering•Planning •Surveying PEARSON MECHANICAL SERVICES
n z I am a duly Lf) Professlonal Engineer Drawn NCS I ;
' W under the law 1[tf$ft t of Minnesota. �� 14800 18th Avenue, Suite 140 I1UG0, MINNESOTA
F � / Date 9/15/05 Plymouth, Minnesota SS447
Signature �lllQav Checked MCA Phone 7631476-60/0 UNITED PROPERTIES
Name: MARK ANDERSON -17-n McCombs Frank Roos fox 7631476-8531
`� Date: License N23450 Approved MCA Associates,Inc. UTILITY PLAN
}
r
� M1
,� t4 IMI ■'
PTI, i
ti,'R FS
t 4
v �
nab ,�: �, •a � qq
n
�I !
Ii V
VF n
i
,ad' cat
IV
r �
Y W
3 �
w
a
4 i4lf•
C I Y
4+. s
r S Q4 Q3 2 o oA QB C D
I I I I I jatvert
mueller
architects,
.
1-. 3500 W.601h St.
Suite 155
&alminyton,MN 551;
_ tN:952-691-5056
1 I 1-.952-697-5073
www.r—lch.net
2 Wei Proposed Bulldity:
S Nath
Pearson
Mechanical
C2 3 w�tats I S � 7 rAa.esx 8 _
Hugo.Mimesota
6-V
IT
w.m.+
t r
❑ O
I I ' I I ". " i � " 6K ragyl .` I. -I. . I Ef6 ogyl !•f lY dwa SFr I Wv-S
------------
3 ;ou61 / + 1 Re�wwY Eari
K-r a-r a.r
�AADL
1 t I 1 t
Iravise
A,
•t 1 � ' 1 1
i I I I i
1 1 1
I I I I a,L eo(
1 I 1
• I I I I I A/ ( I I (
1 Fnx - Frs!Floc
ut6-=r-o-
l!lll�i�l
CA) CC) jafvert
mueller
.� 1' r� I ;A "�"I.' 1I ^'I• 'I!y -+ til" II I� }i Rtl�l':I [ ,1' 1tI I._
M II l II 3 N I I 3,I{ �nl d 1 sI;''J,SaI,' I. �.+, �i,•"� 53' ��5', �.:.• architects,
I- � �.1•�. I• I!. I' •" I t I I' :?i: � F�:l I 'y .�I �' "•'�� ',1'.'��i 4 ■
:161 I: di i I I 4 .3. I •t. �.
lith yj .'t I�Ia ':s�'�tl11 4' ,r;;{g`y� '! t�yhJI+F@(I I�':tlIIC,17I��i ;� IA I� Ib ' Itl ir6� ,j�E .IIT ;i.' ,?�j..r.i I�t I �i + ' 'I'• +hl'I X,!
.n, .I I a II r 9 III rIF'W t� P' b I '•,V, I �11�� �, 'I.• I �� �11 �' -I .!. `` I 9. -}•1 ,ZI t!• I II ,#,.' inc.klC R- t id..!�Id I I'. i. Ii. I Mil�.jl I I :I,Il'INI:dirli b' �;�: I a �. :I II
:_ .I, ■SII/■
Y
,I ;;1"II4353J;� ,I �II4i�pFgl' a 'q �splii , 1 Ii�l ',� 3500 W. 80th St.
I' Itl Il��,is I, I;�. II � ��" ft; �I I v �I�i.� ,i"' h
I` Suite 155
j 1 Bloomington, MN 55431
I j +
„w tel: 952-897-5056
r
��nsh jii p;I �fl!�I11:1ijb'I I .. `41' - fax:952-897-5073
I !, .�,.IISWlltlgl Il�� .I � I�I.�.. I:I� q IW,'I. Ivl ll_rs1;l ».1 www.jmarch.net
0
Proposed Building:
5 Preliminarr�r North
- — — ---------- — --
- ---------
A 1'-0” _ . .. ►` ... ' - --
Pearson
Mechanical
r
61P fi 7 F I C8)
'fTTeCT�J
J
woke_ Fh`,r
" f Architectural Element EntryC
anopy
ArchitecturalElement 8 x12 Glazl 1360"
Flugo, Minnesota
a
Parapet
tl,I'ryjF'Srr,1@4trl,,.rawll 1 l.:Ii tJill I9 4 [,,'�'I aN I� 9fd I�ry. waI ii.I.�R,,q.,ljl� i �.._� •i•�I ;�5•,�':+.5t•a r,+9.',.,�s,.. ,�-�#l*>-sbrt ,.•.�;,S
<..t�`k�:�''•�e_,.!t,AI%.l:t'�33•.: {rs-,+.,`:
'• .,
?�
�..Precast raked panel pattern
a
I!arltl,kj:�11CN�I'.4 t I ;.i I:b IslNbII ��EIId1� 9�II �� a{3j$u�.11ll2i illi# II�Ia��l�a tld.l�� �61�IIII•It I I 3 i ,t, t• 3' -,X '+f rt'
_.-with smooth-white carasrete bands---- —
( K, 7IR fs '"pi I� I Il r Jl. 'g i'•I{ j, +'9ai.,b R'I and accents -
I��I!I I I dlj l'tl l �l d II I' �,i 'j���I^ R I.���I�NI�IE�L`6���yyII''II�.lyl!II� �:�•:I:b ,!I.�!�dll Ij i i,
I1 , '•, f r' f,; 4:I S I ,Ilpk
tt ,Ifs .
IIIF 'I.i .a 1. MS' al. •I •i9- j4 pI 9I I �II - �'°t'x :,t � [Akv,
d9tl,' �: •,. ,_� i-; :.�} ;rt... � �.: .! Main Floor
-v
ff'S canopy ! \ 4'x4'Windows typical
•. �. lis_V 6.., ..
- - r
r
Pearson Mechanical Inc. Site Plan �.
Lot 1,Block 1,Bald Eagle Industrial ° I
Park
i
City of Hugo ---T---------�
Background Update
• 3.3 acre parcel zoned general industrial
• Applicant proposes constructing a 45,000 s.f. City Council approved purchase agreement
building at NE corner of Fenway Boulevard and for the sale of property to Pearson
-s� Fenway Boulevard Circle in the BEIP Mechanical Inc.at the August 15,2005
• 33,800 s.f.warehouse space and 9,600 s.f.related meeting
office space
<_• New headquarters for Pearson Mechanical Inc. — Pearson Mechanical Inc.has 1 year to
• Part of building may be leased to another construct a building on the site
contracting company Planning Commission recommended
• Site Plan approval is required approval of the proposed site plan at the
October 13,2005,meeting
1
rnorouxo enc xm euiop+c row
PEARSM MECHANICAL -- ---
Site Plan Review SERVICES,INC.
H",MN .;,, -------
M 1
t/fPrL. .SS
• Building Setbacks and Height
• Parking13
`a����'�
• Landscaping _ t
• Screening
• Architecture and Building Materials
• Signage
�I
• Lighting -
• Ponding and Stormwater management --"-
• Street Access -
rT
Si t
u a
'
..,..,.m.......®�, f49r /Or
a!!'ee! / ,1•( ;Y �A se is k_. Li LL
fa3 } < q CT q 17 q q q I II'
YWti 6 PnMy.. Ihl9
4.
99 Mme. _ ar. way
� . V
11 PA
,
IC 6
V.
..........
r
C.
Recommendation Black
• Staff finds that the proposal meets the
criteria for approving a site plan
CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA
PROCLAMATION
Thanking Hugo for its generous contribution of Rolling Walkers, canes, and
monetary donation to the City of Hugo, Minnesota and its Senior Citizens
WHEREAS, Hugo is generously donating fifteen Hugo Rolling
Walkers to the Hugo Senior Citizens; and
WHEREAS, Hugo is generously donating canes to the Hugo Senior
Citizens; and
WHEREAS, Hugo is making a generous monetary donation to the
Hugo Senior Citizens; so
THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Hugo, Washington County, State of Minnesota, that it congratulate Hugo on
these generous donations and publicly thank them for this genuine act of
kindness; so
THEREFORE BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Hugo City
Council publicly declares October 17, 2005 to be "Hugo Day" in the City of
Hugo, Minnesota.
Fran Miron, Mayor
x
� y
jafvert
Proposed Building for: X11 mueller
Pearson Mechanical Services, Inc. 9 I architects
� inc.
Hugo, Minnesota 3500 American Blvd.W.
Suite,55
Bloomington,MN 55431
Phone:952-897-5001
Faz:952897 5073
Webs wwwj—chmet
r !
1 P
y� �t
r
CA
� a
ert
Proposed Building for: X11 mu Iler
Pearson Mechanical Services, Inc. iI architects
�T ' inc.
Hugo, Minnesota 3SOSuit American Blvd.W.
Suite 155
Bloomington,MN 55931
Phone:952-897-5001
F-952 897-5073
Web:...ji—h.net
' ? R
1.
jafvert
Proposed Building for: � mueller
Pearson Mechanical Services, Inc. �lop ! architects
inc.
Hugo uite 155
Minnesota Su,t American Blvd.W.
S
81—Ingm,MN 55431
Plane:952897-5001
Fax:952 897
Web:—jmarchnel
fl
City of Hugo
Downtown Redevelopment Plan/TIF District Establishment
Marketing Plan
Proposed Time Schedule
October 17,2005 EDA Meeting
• Discuss draft press release with the EDA , . 0;
• EDA reviews proposed marketing plan ,'
• Schedule meeting date for joint council/EDA workshop
October/November The City arranges meetings with groups of key
property owners and individuals in the downtown
Late-October Hugo City Report Newsletter(November Edition)
• Include the following updates on the downtown
redevelopment plan
• Downtown Design Guideline Adoption
• Maxfield Research Market Study
• Present Downtown Framework map
• Notification of upcoming meetings
November 21,2005 Joint Council/EDA workshop (hosted by Springsted)
• Informative meeting about TIF
• Discuss implementation/marketing strategy
Nov/Early Dec First Three Press Releases sent to downtown neighbors (upload
(After Joint Workshop) onto City website for view by the general public)
■ Background, goals, objectives of plan
■ Intro Q&A about TIF/downtown plan
■ Notification of upcoming neighborhood meetings/open house
Nov/Dec City staff arranges meetings with groups of neighborhood
(After Joint Workshop) residents and downtown business owners
• Egg Lake residents and business owners
• Residents on old CASH 8
• Residents along Hwy 61 by `End Zone Property'
Mid December Downtown Redevelopment Plan Open House Meeting
December Fourth Press Release
(After Open House)
■ Notification of TIF District Qualification procedures (need
for inspections)
■ Accompanied by letters sent to property owners requesting
voluntary inspections (by this time most property owners
will already be aware of reasons for inspections)
City of Hugo
Downtown Redevelopment Project
Q & A Newsletter Draft
This Q&A newsletter responds to some of the recent questions about the
Downtown Hugo Redevelopment Project.
Q. What is happening with the Downtown Redevelopment Project?
A. The Planning Commission and the City Council recently held a joint meeting to discuss and
begin to finalize the new design guidelines for the downtown area. The design guidelines are
the result of a collaborative effort from businesses, residents, City staff and officials, and are
intended to provide direction and shape plans for anticipated development in downtown Hugo.
The City has also retained the services of Maxfield Research, through a grant from Metropolitan
Council, to conduct a market study of the downtown area. The market study is needed to know
if there is a market for the proposed uses and to understand what rates people will potentially
pay for those uses. The Economic Development Authority (EDA) has become very involved in
guiding the redevelopment process. The EDA have been meeting with developers interested in
implementing the downtown plan, and non-profit public sector financing organizations, at their
regularly scheduled meetings. The EDA has also established a subcommittee responsible for
formulating a plan to create a Tax Increment Financing (TIF) Redevelopment District for the
downtown area.
Q. What type of development is proposed for the Downtown Area?
A. The redevelopment project reflects the community's vision for a pedestrian friendly town
center with unique mixtures of housing, retail, office space, trails, and public amenities such as
a new City park across from City Hall and a boardwalk along Egg Lake. Other proposed uses
include a senior housing facility, a new Carpenter's Restaurant along the shore of Egg Lake,
and specialty retail and gift shops.
Q. Which part of downtown will be developed first?
A. The most likely part of downtown to develop first will be the properties along Egg Lake across
from City Hall. Over the past few years, the City has been acquiring properties along the
western edge of Egg Lake as they become available on the market. The City now owns a
substantial amount of downtown real estate. Retaining ownership of the properties allows the
City a considerable amount of control over the future uses of the site. It is possible, however,
that separate redevelopment projects could happen in different parts of the downtown
simultaneously.
Q. What is the typical time frame for a redevelopment project?
A. The planning process for a typical redevelopment project can take up to two years.
Construction then begins and that could take two years depending on the size of the project. For
a redevelopment project to work, it must not only meet community goals, but also make sense
from both a market and financial perspective. Hugo's project is unique due to the complexities of
redeveloping many different parcels and to assure the public's involvement in the planning and
design stage.
Q. How will the project be funded?
A. The City received funding through a Livable Communities Grant form the Metropolitan
Council to conduct preliminary planning and concept refinement for the downtown area. The
City will continue to look for other grant sources but the project will be funded primarily by
private developers. The City will provide additional assistance through Tax Increment Financing
(TIF) as necessary for public improvements and the City has retained independent financial
consultants to ensure that any assistance provided to the developer is only the amount that is
justifiable and reasonable.
Q. What is Tax Increment Financing (TIF)?
A. TIF is a financing tool created by the Minnesota State Legislature in the 1970s to help
encourage development and redevelopment of underutilized properties that ordinarily would not
be revitalized without some financial assistance. Under TIF, property tax revenue equivalent to
what the current property generates continues to go to all taxing jurisdictions. The portion of the
tax revenue that results from the increased value of the new development, also called the "tax
increment," is used to pay site costs such as acquisition, demolition, water, sewer and street
improvements. Once the site costs have been paid, the tax increment goes to the taxing
jurisdictions.
Q. Why does the City need to establish a TIF District?
A. Minnesota State Statute permits cities to establish TIF Districts as a method to assist with
redevelopment. Establishing a TIF District allows the City to capture the tax increment created
by the new development; then the City may use portions or all of the increment to provide
financial assistance to the developer. The amount of the actual assistance provided is
determined by an analysis by the City's independent financial advisor. The financial
performance submitted by the developer will be analyzed to determine the gap or amount that
would be necessary to make the development financially feasible.
Q. Will providing TIF assistance to the developer impact my property taxes?
A. No. The tax increment comes from only the increased value of the improved property within
the district and the pre-existing level of taxes still continues to be paid to local governments
(city, county, and school district).
Q. Does the City own all the property included in the project?
A. The City owns many of the properties along the western edge of Egg Lake; however, the City
is not actively negotiating sales with the property owners but rather has been slowly acquiring
the parcels over time through tax forfeitures or when the owner decides to sell for various
reasons. After the City enters into a development agreement, it will primarily be the private
developer who will be responsible for negotiating with downtown property owners. The City may
assist in the process to ensure that the ensuing relocation process is as smooth as possible for
local businesses and residents who wish to remain in Hugo.
Q. What happens if the property owners cannot reach an agreement with the private
developer?
A. The City will encourage the developer to reach a voluntary agreement with property owners.
If the developer and the property owner are unable to reach agreement, a mediator will be used
to assist with the process. At this time the City Council has not decided from a policy standpoint
whether or not pursuing the process of condemnation will be considered during the property
acquisition stage of the downtown redevelopment project.
Q. If my property is in the TIF district does that mean my home or business is going to
be redeveloped?
A. No. The TIF district overlays the entire redevelopment project area. Tax Increment revenue
from property valuation will be captured from all parcels within the district but inclusion in the
district does not mean that every parcel will be redeveloped. The property within the district that
does not get developed or redeveloped may be removed from the district at a later date.
Q. Once the City begins working with a developer, is the redevelopment a "sure thing"?
A. No. There will still be land use and other regulatory approvals, environmental impact studies,
securing of financing, and acquisition of property that must occur before the development is a
"sure thing". Residents and business owners will also have several more opportunities through
public hearings and City-sponsored open houses to give input and share their opinions before
any development plans are finalized
Q. How can I stay informed?
A. There are several ways you can stay informed:
• Attend regular EDA meetings, which are held on the third Monday of each month at 8:00 a.m.
at Hugo City Hall, 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue. In addition, regular Planning Commission and City
Council meetings are broadcast live and replayed on cable channel 16.
• Visit the City's Website for project updates located at www.ci.hugo.mn.us
• Read the Neighborhood News & Report and the Hugonian, the City's two local newspapers,
and the Hugo City Report, the City's bi-monthly newsletter. Articles on the project and
information about upcoming meetings frequently appear in the local papers and in the City's
newsletter.
• Contact the Director of Community Development Bryan Bear or other community development
staff members at anytime. The City Hall phone number is (651) 762-6300.
SEP-27-2005 11:33 WASH CTY ADMIN 651 430 6017 P.002
Committee Book 2005 0
HOUSING AND REDEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(HRA)
BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
PURPOSE
Authorized by the Minnesota Housing and Redevelopment Act, Cha ter 487, Minnesota
Session Laws of 1947,to undertake certain types of housing and redev lopment activities in
Washington County. Washington County Board Resolution No.80-87 established the HRA
after certain need findings.
COMPOSITION
The Washington County Housing and Redevelopment Authority Board Members are
appointed by the Washington County Board and consists of:
Five (5) citizen members (one from each Commissioner District)
One (1) County Commissioner
One (1)consumer of HFLA services as required in the Code of Federal Regulations
TERMS
Members are appointed for three-year terms.The County Board will li itthe appointment of
Commission members to no more than two consecutive three year to ms. Partial terms to
fill mid-term vacancies will not be counted in this limit.
MEETINGS
The Housing and Redevelopment Authority Board meets on the th rd Tuesday of each
month.
REMUNERATION
Minnesota Statutes (Section 469.001 et. seq.) provide that HRA Eoard Members may
receive up to$55.00 per meeting. The Washington County HRA provides for this payment.
Housing and Redevelopment Authority Boa d of Commissioners
29
TOTAL P.002
Page 1 of 1.
Mike Ericson
From: Theresa Charpentier[Theresa.Charpentier@toro.com]
Sent: Monday, October 10, 2005 4:32 PM
To: Mike Ericson
Subject: Resignation of the EDA
Mike, '
This email confirms our discussion last week that my new management role at Toro Company conflicts with my
EDA role and responsibilities. I regretfully resign from my position on the Hugo Economic Development Authority
position. Thank you for the learning and growth opportunity. 1 will continue to support the mission and objectives
of the community and always feel welcome to contact me if needed in the future.
Regards,
Theresa Charpentier
TORO Commercial Division
Technical Services Manager
8111 Lyndale Avenue South
Bloomington, MN 55420
O-952.887.8814
C -651.245.1193
F-952.887.7292
10/10/05
CITY OF HUGO
ADMINISTRATION
MEMORANDUM
TO: Mike Ericson, City Administrator
FROM: Tom Denaway, Administrative Intern
SUBJECT: EDA Commissioner Applicants
DATE: September 2, 2004
As per your request here is a list of the applicants who have applied to serve on the board
of commissioners of the newly re-organized Hugo EDA.
Debi Burmeister—Local business owner and Hugo resident, who has been active with
both local newspapers and various community organizations.
Jim Bever—Local business owner and Hugo resident. Is president of an area
landscaping company
Theresa Charpentier—Hugo Resident who recently applied for a position on the parks
commission. Has a B.A. in Marketing Management and a M.A. in Organizational
Management. Currently is an adjunct professor for Concordia University.
Nick Skarich—Hugo Resident, and Vice President with Northland Securities. He served
as the contract director for the Grand Rapids EDA, and has served on other EDA boards
as well. With NorthLand,he specializes in commercial loan syndications and the
placement/sale of tax increment revenue notes.
Scott Montgomery—Hugo Resident. Is currently serving on the White Bear Township
Economic Development Advisory Board.
Janice Arcand—Hugo Business owner. Served on the White Bear Area Chamber of
Commerce for three years (97-99).
Kevin Miller—Hugo Resident, is Chairman of the planning commission for the City of
Shafer.
Michael Compton—Hugo Resident. Is currently a student at Century College, and is in
the process of developing a property management company.
Phillip Klein—Hugo Resident. Currently serving on the Saint John's Parish Council.
To: Mike Ericson
Memo: EDA Commissioner Applicants
Page: 2
Jill Hughes-Weidenbacher—Hugo Resident. Served on the Oakdale Economic
Development Commission in 2000 and 2001. Worked for the City of St. Paul in their
planning and economic development department for eight years. Currently works for the
State of MN in the Department of Employment and Economic Development.
Elizabeth Wallen—Hugo Resident. Reporter for the Hugonian, also works in Sales and
Marketing for the Star Tribune. Also does Freelance Media Consulting, and has a strong
marketing background.
Jim Kellison—Former Planning Commissioner
Bob Berens— Lino Lakes Resident. Owns a public relations consulting business. Is a
member of the St. Paul Area Chamber of Commerce.