Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017.11.06 CC PacketAGENDA HUGO CITY COUNCIL MONDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 2017 - 7:00 PM HUGO CITY HALL A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. October 14, 2017 YRN BBQ Rib Cook -off 2. October 16, 2017 City Council Meeting 3. October 19, 2017 Neighborhood Meeting-Oneka Lake Boulevard and Harrow Avenue 4. October 23, 2017 Good Life Senior Living Groundbreaking E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Donation to the Yellow Ribbon Network from the Fry Group\ 2. G. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion and a roll call vote. If a member of the City Council or the public wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Approve Resolution Designating Precinct Polling Locations for the 2018 Election 3. Approve Resolution Approving CUP for Gunsmithing at 5611 152nd Street North, Unit 3 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. H. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Update on Oneka Lake Blvd/Harrow Avenue Neighborhood Meeting and Approve Resolution Authorizing Preparation of Feasibility Study 2. I. NEW BUSINESS 1. Discussion on Concept Plan for Creekside Heights 2. Discussion on Revisions to City Code Regarding Small Cell Technology in ROW 3. J. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. 2. K. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Yellow Ribbon Network Report 2. L. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Legislative Reception Thursday, November 16, 2017 2. Reschedule Comprehensive Plan Workshop to February 26, 2018 3. M. ADJOURNMENT MINUTES FOR THE HUGO CITY COUNCIL YRN FUNDRAISER BBQ RIB COOK -OFF OCTOBER 14, 2017 PRESENT: Klein, Miron, Petryk, Weidt AB S ENT: Haas The Council attended the free BBQ Rib Cook -off sponsored by the Fry Group. This event was held at Lion's Park from 11:30 a.m. to 2 p.m. as a fundraiser benefiting the Yellow Ribbon Network. Respectfully Submitted, Michele Lindau City Clerk MINUTES FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON MONDAY, OCTOBER 16, 2017 Call to Order Mayor Weidt called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PRESENT: Haas, Klein, Miron, Petiyk, Weidt ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: City Administrator Bryan Bear, Finance Director Ron Otkin� � �'�story Intern Olivia Schiffman, and City Clerk Michele Lindau October 2, 2017 Planning Commission Interviews Miron made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the minutes for the Planning Commission interviews on October 2, 2017, as presented. October 2, 2017 City Council Meeting Klein made motion, Petryk seconded, to approve the minutes for the City Council meeting on October 2, 2017, as presented. All Ayes. Motion carried October 5, 2017 Water Quality Meeting Klein made motion, Miron seconded, to approve the minutes for the Water Quality Meeting on October 5, 2017, as presented. All Ayes. Motion carried October 6, 2017 Wilson Tool Open House Petryk made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the minutes for the Wilson Tool Open House on October 6, 2017, as amended to add Miron in attendance. All Ayes. Motion carried October 7, 2017 Citywide Bus Tour Klein made motion, Miron seconded, to approve the minutes for the Citywide Bus Tour on October 7, 2017, as presented. All Ayes. Motion carried Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for October 16, 2017 Page 2 of 5 October 7, 2017 Fire Department Open House as presented Klein made motion, Petryk seconded, to approve the minutes for the Fire Department Open House on October 7, 2017, as presented. All Ayes. Motion carried Approval of the Agenda Weidt made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the agenda as amended to include a discussion on the charitable gambling contributions report. All Ayes. Motion carried. Approval of the Consent Agenda Haas made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the following Consent Agenda items. 1. Approval of Claims 2. Approve Annual Performance Review for Accounting Clerk Anna Wobse 3. Approve Notice of Retirement from Senior Engineering Technician Steve Duff and Authorize Advertisement for Engineering Technician 4. Approve Appointment of Kim Luchsinger and Matthew Derr to the Planning Commission All Ayes. Motion carried. Approval of Claims Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Claims Roster as presented. Approve Annual Performance Review for Accounting Clerk Anna Wobse The City of Hugo hired Anna Wobse as the City's new Accounting Clerk on October 27, 2008. Over the past nine years, Anna has worked under the direction of Finance Director Ron Otkin in accounts payable and payroll functions. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the annual performance review for Accounting Clerk Anna Wobse. Approve Notice of Retirement from Senior Engineering Technician Steve Duff and Advertisement for Replacement Senior Engineering Technician Steve Duff had submitted his notice of retirement effective January 31, 2018. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved this notice and approved the advertisement for his replacement. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for October 16, 2017 Page 3 of 5 Approve Appointment of Kim Luchsinger and Matthew Derr to the Planning Commission On October 2, 2017, the Council interviewed three individuals for two vacancies on the Planning Commission due to the resignation of Chantell Knauss and Bob Rosenquist this past June. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the appointment of Kim Luchsinger and Matthew Derr as new members of the Planning Commissions with terms to expire on December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2020 respectively. Update on Hopkins Schoolhouse — History Intern Olivia Schiffman History Intern Oliva Schiffman provided Council an update on the Hopkins schoolhouse, located at 5970 170th Street North, beginning with a brief history on the structure. The schoolhouse was built in 1927 on land donated to the school district by the Hopkins family. The district changed multiple times ending in the Forest Lake School District. It served as an ungraded one room elementary school, teaching Grades 1-6 until it was closed in the spring of 1962. After that, it was used as the Oneka Town Hall in the late sixties and early seventies, and more recently was used by the boy scouts as a youth center in the early 2000s. Olivia spoke about the open house held on September 8, 2017, where approximately 33 people attended to provide input on what the future of the structure should be. Oliva explained the City received an $8,000 Legacy Grant through the State of Minnesota and the MN Historical Society to hire a contractor to come out and evaluate the historic value of the schoolhouse. The City could then be eligible for more grants for an in-depth analysis on the building and possible inclusion on the National Register of Historic Places. If it's not seen as historical on a national level, the City could seek money through the Legacy Grant to preserve it on a local level. City Administrator Bryan Bear added that the Historical Commission will be making a recommendation to the Council in the future concerning options for the future of the schoolhouse. Discussion on MN Department of Health -Advancing Safe and Sustainable Water Reuse in Minnesota City Administrator Bryan Bear informed Council the MN Department of Health had released a draft report regarding water reuse in Minnesota. The City has been using stormwater reuse tools, and there has been some difficulty getting these projects through. The MN Legislature had recently removed the appropriation permit process with the DNR to allow reuse project without requiring their extensive process first. State agencies have been grappling with how to regulate these activities, and an interagency work group had been formed with its primary objective to eliminate barriers. WSB Engineering had provided Council their review on the report, and Bear explained there was an opportunity for the Council to provide comments to the state agencies and legislature on this issue as well. City Engineer Mark Ericson explained the Minnesota Legislature directed the Minnesota Department of Health to "prepare a comprehensive study of and recommendations for regulatory and non -regulatory approaches to water reuse for use in the development of state policy for water reuse in Minnesota," with funding through the Clean Water Fund of the Clean Water, Land and Legacy Amendment. The MN Department of Health had completed its final draft of the report on Advancing Safe and Sustainable Water Reuse in Minnesota. He talked about the group's main objectives: to define successful implementation of water reuse; identify current conditions that Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for October 16, 2017 Page 4 of 5 support water reuse;identify barriers and solutions to the barriers; and develop recommendations for safe and sustainable water reuse practices and policies. Erichson highlighted items in the report including the strong focus on public health that will likely lead to additional permitting requirements. In the report, water reused for irrigation was viewed similarly to drinking water, and it was recommend that similar standards be adopted. Erichson stated that such treatment would add a lot of expense and feels this needs to be studied further. He talked about the review of the report by the MN Cities Stormwater Coalition and their fear that information in the report will become regulatory in absence of other guidance. Erichson recommended that certain language regarding treatment requirements be removed from the report until research is completed and that the workgroup focus on its original purpose of promoting water reuse. City Administrator Bryan Bear explained the concern was that there is a chance stormwater reuse could provide people or animals exposure to something in the water that could be a health danger, and in the report they are providing precautionary recommendations without scientific basis. He expects the workgroup to be reporting back to the legislators in the spring, and he recommended a letter be sent to the interagency working group with copies going to legislators. Haas said they should not be asking regulators for permission; a great conflict of interest exists there. If there is a health concern about water that is being reused, they should be doing something about what is in the water now. In the absence of scientific data, jurisdiction, and imagining problems that don't exist, obstacles will created. aaaao,.. `°BSk�86a.. Weidt agreed and said rules are made up for everything possible instead of probable and things are being done without any scientific fact. They need to be redirected back to their purpose. Miron also agreed, and he talked about the 25 by 25 workshop last week where Hugo was pointed out as a positive example in water reuses, and this report seemed to be contradictory to the messages from that workshop. Miron fully supported sending the letter, and he suggested broadening the list of recipients. Miron made motion, Klein seconded, to direct staff to draft a letter in response to the working group's report. All Ayes. Motion carrie� Yellow Ribbon Network Report Council Member Chuck Haas and Council Member Phil Klein reported to Council on the Yellow Ribbon Network activities held recently. The YRN assisted a woman by connecting her with someone to do daycare. They received toys in response to a request from a soldier. A check was received from Mark Schwope, and the Fry Group had raised $757 from the BBQ Rib Cook -off. Care packages are still being sent, and Ryan Companies wants to assist in packaging. Next week is burger night, and it will be sponsored by Wilson Tool. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for October 16, 2017 Page 5 of 5 Discussion on Contributions from Charitable Gambling Haas added this to the agenda to reference the report provided by the City Clerk on disbursements made by organizations conducting charitable gambling in establishment in Hugo. It was noted that some organizations are not donating the requested 15-100% back into the Hugo Community. Haas made motion, Klein seconded, to direct staff to send a "thank you" to those organizations and a reminder to donate the requested percentages. All Ayes. Motion carried. Oneka/Harrow Road Proiect Neighborhood Meeting on Thursday, October 19, 2017 City Administrator Bryan Bear reminded Council a meeting had been scheduled with property owners on Oneka Lake Boulevard and Harrow Avenue to discuss a potential 2018 street improvement project. The meeting will be held on Thursday, October 19, 2017 at 7 p.m. at the Rice Lake Centre. Ground Breaking Event on October 23, 2017 City Administrator Bryan Bear informed Council they had been invited to attend the ground breaking ceremony at the site of the future Good Life Senior Living at the southeast corner of TH61 and 130th Street on Monday, October 23, at noon. Klein made motion, Petryk seconded, to schedule the Good Life Senior Living Ground Breaking on October 23, 2017. A96101k4g���R4 "g All Ayes. Motion carried. Adi ournment Klein made motion, Miron seconded to adjourn at 7:49 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, .;Al�''��...... Michele Lindau City Clerk MINUTES FOR THE HUGO CITY COUNCIL ONEKA LAKE BLVD/HARROW AVENUE NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING OCTOBER 19, 2017 PRESENT: Klein, Miron, Petryk, Weidt ABSENT: Haas ALSO PRESENT: Senior Engineering Technician Steve Duff, City Engineer Mark Erichson, Public Works Director Scott Anderson, Lydia Larson WSB A meeting was held at 7 p.m. at the Rice Lake Center with residents living on Oneka Lake Boulevard and Harrow Avenue to discuss a potential street improvement project in 2018. Residents in attendance seemed to favor the roadway reconstruction but were not in favor of widening the roadway for a trail or having a trail installed off the roadway area. There was conversation regarding the trail system shown in the comprehensive plan that the residents were not in favor of.��.. About half the residents within the proposed project area were in attendance. Respectfully Submitted, Steve Duff T' Sen - --= --- -- T --�- -=-=- - MINUTES FOR THE HUGO CITY COUNCIL GOOD LIFE SENIOR LIVING GROUNDBREAKING OCTOBER 23, 2017 PRESENT: Klein, Miron, Petryk, Weidt ABSENT: Haas The Council attended the Good Life Senior Living ground breaking ceremny held on Monday, October 23, 2017 at noon. The project is located at the southeast corner of 61/130th Street North. Respectfully Submitted, Michele Lindau City Clerk City of Hugo Claims November 6, 2017 G. 1 Vendor Invoice Amount Description Department Alex Air Apparatus Inc 34185 $ 118.31 SCBA Equipment Parts & Repairs Fire Dept Alex Air Apparatus Inc 34169 $ 323.20 Filters for SCBA Masks Fire Dept Alex Air Apparatus Inc 34246 $ 730.00 Compressor Service & Air Quality Test Fire Dept Alex Air Apparatus Inc 34295 $ 445.07 Lite Force Plus Helmets Fire Dept ARC Irrigation 6848 $ 480.00 Hanifl Fields Irrigation System Winterization Parks Dept ARC Irrigation 6848 $ 1,020.00 CSAH 8 Irrigation System Winterization Street Dept Aspen Mills 205194 $ 58.65 HFD Shirts Fire Dept Bauer Built Tire 180219790 $ 620.00 Tires - Unit #114 Street Dept Bieniek, Bob CLAIM $ 233.62 2017 Fire Chiefs Conference Expenses Fire Dept Blue Tarp Financial Inc 362064775 $ 35.18 Hardware (CH) Gen Gov't Bldgs Blue Tarp Financial Inc 362063637 $ 399.00 Honda Water Pump - Unit #311 Parks Dept Bound Tree Medical LLC 82666582 $ 253.16 AED Batteries Fire Dept Bound Tree Medical LLC 82666581 $ 12.22 Medical Supplies Fire Dept Century College 656588 $ 1,200.00 2017 CEU Firefighter Program Fire Dept Century Link 651 653-1154 $ 57.82 SCADA Lines Water & Sewer Century Link 651429-3212 $ 70.49 Fire Station Phone Lines Fire Dept Chet's Shoes 62132 $ 153.13 Work Boots - Scott Anderson Public Works Cintas Corporation 9018446156 $ 39.89 First Aid Supplies Public Works City of Roseville 223739 $ 406.96 October Phone Service Various City of Roseville 223714 $ 4,690.92 October Computer Service Various Colvard, Kevin CLAIM $ 604.86 2017 Fire Chiefs Conference Expenses Fire Dept Comcast 10/11/2017 $ 239.85 Business Internet (thru November 20) Administration Comcast 10/18/2017 $ 155.77 Business Internet (thru November 27) Fire Dept Compton Jr, Jim CLAIM $ 988.31 2017 Fire Chiefs Conference Expenses Fire Dept Compton Jr, Jim CLAIM $ 181.04 Makita Drill Kit (Home Depot) Fire Dept Compton Jr, Jim CLAIM $ 10.08 Pest Control Supplies (Home Depot) Fire Dept Connelly Industrial Electronics 10947 $ 210.70 Tech Labor - Well No.6_ Water Utility Custom Fire Apparatus Inc 0017870 -IN $ 4,813.80 Generator Repairs - Unit #4215 Fire Dept De Lage Landen Financial Services Inc 56552844 $ 311.37 October Copier Lease Payment Administration Ferguson Waterworks 264482 $ 1,170.27 Straw Blankets & Turf Staples Stormwater Fund Ferguson Waterworks 264887 $ 670.32 Spanner Wrenches Water Utility Ferguson Waterworks 264887 $ 30.27 Turf Staples Stormwater Fund Fire Instruction Rescue Education 2774 $ 1,500.00 Live Burn Training Fire Dept Fire Safety USA Inc 103837 $ 85.00 Toolok Mounting Bracket Fire Dept Fordham, Jim CLAIM $ 551.64 2017 Fire Chiefs Conference Expenses Fire Dept Forest Lake YMCA 10/25/2017 $ 1,465.00 Park Play Days Parks Dept G & K Services September $ 362.52 Cleaning Supplies Various G & K Services September $ 1,131.14 Uniform & Floor Mat Services Various G & K Services September $ 665.85 Supplies & Floor Mat Services Fire Dept Galls LLC 8336284 $ 32.58 Class A Uniform Cap Badge Fire Dept Galls LLC 8336242 $ 24.50 Class A Uniform Cap Badge Fire Dept Galls LLC 8336285 $ 24.99 Class A Uniform Cap Badge Fire Dept Guareschi, Jodie CLAIM $ 110.20 Utility Bill Folding (Office Max) Water/Sewer Hawkins Inc 4165661 RI $ 1,303.32 Water Chemicals Water Utility HD Supply Waterworks LTD 1023278 $ 3,123.75 Radio Meters Water Utility Hoernemann, Ross CLAIM $ 711.06 2017 Fire Chiefs Conference Expenses Fire Dept Holiday Companies 155428319 $ 2.02 Fuel Street Dept Holiday Companies 213234383 $ 12.42 Fuel Fire Dept Holiday Companies 213726386 $ 37.23 Fuel Fire Dept Holiday Companies 213800416 $ 9.67 Fuel Fire Dept Holiday Companies 134601258 $ 18.84 Fuel Street Dept Holiday Companies 134601258 $ 127.63 Propane for Paver Street Dept Holiday Companies 153607274 $ 27.90 Propane for Open House Fire Dept Hugo Equipment Company 117684 $ 45.79 Repairs - Truck Vent Fan Fire Dept Hugo Equipment Company 118672 $ 79.99 Pump Repairs - Unit #4221 Fire Dept Hugo Equipment Company 119693 $ 23.39 Pulley Fire Dept Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN1780512 $ 151.96 Copy Paper Administration Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN1780512 $ 96.16 Breakroom Supplies Gen Gov't Bldgs Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN1780512 $ 88.79 Pencils, Pens, Markers, Highlighters, Etc Administration Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN1791848 $ 262.34 Toner Cartridge & Rubber Bands Building Inspections Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN1802438 $ 51.36 Pens Administration Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN1803239 $ 3.12 Tape Instrumental Research Inc 580 $ 100.00 Water Bacteria Testing _Administration Water Utility Integra Telecom - Allstream 14952129 $ 91.80 Fax Lines Administration Jefferson Fire & Safety Inc 241271 $ 2,132.01 Honeywell Tails & Pants Fire Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 124584 $ 194.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Lions Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 124585 $ 151.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Oakshore Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 124586 $ 151.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Oneka Lake Park Parks Dept .Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 124587 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Beaver Ponds Park Parks Dept Page 1 City of Hugo Claims November 6, 2017 G. 1 Vendor Invoice Amount Description Department Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 124588 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Diamond Point Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 124589 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Frog Hollow Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 124590 $ 508.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Hanifl Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 124591 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Valjean Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 124592 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Arbre Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 124593 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Heritage Ponds Park Parks De:t Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 124594 $ 67.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Compost Site Recycling Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 124595 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - McCollar Park Parks Dept Johnson/Turner September $ 4,297.96 September Prosecution Fees ;Flat Fee) General Legal Johnson/Turner September $ 448.95 September Disbursements : Prosecution Costs) General Legal Johnson/Turner September $ 1,056.75 September Civil Legal Fees - See Attached Breakdown General Legal Kath Fuel Oil Service Co. 605170 $ 1,320.00 Bulk Lubricants Public Works Kichler, Dave CLAIM $ 80.50 Electrical Inspection Fees (Change Orders) Electrical Inspections Knowlan's Suoer Markets Inc 1189 $ 19.97 Open House Supplies - Hopkins School House Historical Commission Knowlan's Super Markets Inc 4979 $ 23.96 Movie Night SuL.r lies Parks De,d Knowlan's Super Markets Inc 4980 $ 35.94 Movie Night Supplies Parks Dept Knowlan's Super Markets Inc 7000 $ 20.00 Soft Drinks for Lobby Machine Gen Gov't Bldgs Knowlan's Super Markets Inc 7914 $ 19.98 Meeting Supplies Fire Dept Landform 26518 $ 7,177.25 2040 Comp Plan Planning & Zoning MailFinance N6805538 $ 55.70 Meter Rental - September Administration MailFinance N6805538 $ 55.70 Meter Rental - October Administration MailFinance N6805538 $ 55.70 Meter Rental - November Administration Menards 64215 $ 19.96 Hardware - Front Counter Computer Administration Menards 63778 $ 245.14 Fire Department Open House Supplies Fire Dept Menards 64732 $ 127.31 Fire Department Open House Supplies Fire Dept Menards 65792 $ 46.06 Raingarden Supplies Gen Gov't Bldgs Menards 65318 $ 21.00 PVC Conduit Stormwater Fund Metering & Technology Solutions 10241 $ 260.00 Water Meter & Hardware Water Utility Millard, Doug CLAIM $ 726.38 2017 Fire Chiefs Conference Expenses Fire Dept Millard, Doug CLAIM $ 894.47 6x6 Repairs jousley Motorsports Fire Dept Miller Excavating Inc 23881 $ 111.32 Washed Sand - 174th Street Street Dept Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 1117P02 $ 605.00 October Cleaning Service Gen Gov't Bldgs Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 1117P03 $ 500.00 October Cleaning Service Public Works Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 1117P03 $ 225.00 October Cleaning Service Fire Dept Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 1117PO4 $ 100.00 October Cleaning Service - Hanifl Parks Dept MN Fire Service Certification Board 5121 $ 175.00 Recertification (7) Fire Dept Motorola Solutions Inc 13185213 $ 694.56 Pager Batteries Fire Dept M -R Sign Co Inc 195938 $ 206.55 Neighborhood Crime Watch Signs Street Dept Municipal Code Corporation 296469 $ 500.00 Annual Code on Internet Fee City Clerk Municipal Code Corporation 297163 $ 2,101.59 Supplement Pages City Clerk Nelson, Neal CLAIM $ 45.33 Class A License Renewal Street Dept North Memorial 8885020 $ 528.00 EMR Refresher Course (24) Fire Dept Performance Plus LLC 4798 LF $ 50.00 Mask Fit (2) Fire Dept Polar Chevrolet 81269 $ 76.54 Parts - Unit #114 Street Dept Press Publications 567251 $ 868.00 Tour de Hurio Advertisement Parks Dept Press Publications 569496 $ 300.00 Movie Night Advertisement Parks Dept Rabouin Inc CLAIM $ 3,000.00 2018 Assessment - Partial Billin_7 #10 Assessor Roseville Area Optimist Club 62011 $ 20.00 Meeting Registration - Bryan Bear Administration Roseville Area Optimist Club 62011 $ 20.00 Meeting Registration - Rachel Leitz Community Development Sam's Club 61825 $ 213.25 Fire Department Supplies Fire Dept Sam's Club 61948 $ 267.45 Fire Department Supplies Fire Dept Sam's Club 62135 $ 84.60 Breakroom Supplies Public Works SAS Pest Control 36 $ 87.50 Pest Control - Hanifl Shelter Parks Dept SAS Pest Control 36 $ 87.50 Pest Control - Public Works Building Public Works Schifsky (T.A.) & Sons Inc 62143 $ 52.52 Aggregate Asphalt Street Dept Schifsky (T.A.) & Sons Inc 62186 $ 543.51 Aggregate Asphalt Street Dept Schifsky (T.A.) & Sons Inc 62226 $ 572.98 Aggregate Asphalt Street Dept SHI International Corp 807161758 $ 243.00 Windows Office License - Front Counter Computer Administration SiteOne Landscape Supply LLC 82991361 $ 524.25 Irrigation Hardware Parks Dept Sun Life Financial November $ 696.45 Disability Premium Finance Dept Tierney Brothers 755233 $ 87.00 Plotter Printer Paper Planning & Zoning T -Mobile 870254054 $ 56.27 Cellular Phone Charges Administration T -Mobile 870254054 $ 1,607.14 Cellular Phone Charges Various Toshiba Business Solutions 13946639 $ 3.86 Final Meter Billing - B&W Fire Dept Toshiba Business Solutions 13946639 $ 27.34 Final Meter Billing - Color Fire Dept Toshiba Financial Services 67481476 $ 175.23 September Copier Lease Payment Fire Dept Toshiba Financial Services 67526383 $ 175.23 October Copier Lease Payment Fire Dept Toshiba Financial Services 67651953 $ 175.23 November Copier Lease Payment Fire Dept Toshiba Financial Services 67651953 $ 4.39 Overage Charges; B & Wi Fire Dent Page 2 Vendor City of Hugo Claims November 6, 2017 Invoice Amount Toshiba Financial Services 67651953 Town of May 10/13/2017 Trade Press Inc 27566 TrueNorth Steel BL0000007301 University of Minnesota Registration Verizon Wireless 9793937735 Verizon Wireless 9794757363 Washington County Conservation District 3944 Washington County Public Works 71574 White Bear Area Chamber of Commerce 13303 WSB & Associates September Total Claims for November 6, 2017 $ 36.01 Overage Charges (Color) $ 1,000.50 Dust Control - Keystone Avenue i,1/2; $ 79.00 Water Service Door Hangers $ 302.00 Culvert & End Section $ 250.00 Building Seminars Registration - Chuck Preisler $ 637.26 Cellular Phone Charges $ 40.02 Cellular Phone Charges $ 625.00 East Metro Watershed Membership - Duff $ 752.97 Shoulder Machine Rental ?Shouldering Project) $ 540.00 Membership Renewal $ 38,376.00 Engineering Fees - See Attached Breakdown $ 112,607.36 Page 3 G. 1 Department Fire Dept Street De -,.)t Water Utility Stormwater Fund Building Inspections Fire Dept Fire Dept Stormwater Fund Street Dept Dues/Memberships Various JOHNSON/TURNER LEGAL - -- October 11, 2017 City of Hugo Attn: Ron Otkin 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Dear Ron: Enclosed, please find our billing statements for the City of Hugo as of September 30, 2017. Below is a summary of the matter description, subtotal and total amount due and owing for the attached statements: MATTER MATTER I.D. SUBTOTAL 13101 Henna Avenue (Schultz Matter) 17-4918-001 $319.50 Carpenter Prope!ly Purchase 12-2359-027 $52.50 Deutsche Bank Litiation 17-2359-044 $15.0.0 General 2017 17-2359-043 $501.00 White Bear Lake Restoration Litigation 13-2359-032 $168.75 Prosecution TOTAL NOW DUE: 12-2359-024 _ $4,746.91 $5,803.66 Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the billing statements. Sincerely, >vid ER LEGAL nyder DKS/mah Enclosures 56EastBroadwayAvenue, Suite 206 / Forest Lake, MN55025 / p 651.464.7292 f 651.464.7348 / johnsonturnercom FOREST LAKE / LAKE ELMO / WOODBURY / BLAINE I � d O H N O9. 0O O O O MO 00 CO; h D MON M f -n O M CV M OO 1'- O CV.M M N�O C O N o M ON M N d_ _O MCMMOIOCOw O Co 1-- O O MW O CN CO M NM V V7 CO Nj�O N�E 69 69 6 6% U) m 6% d'i69 O p O O p , p O a a LO N 0 a a o o a N O O p O i M Op O O O LL) O O O. r L6 M O O V M V1 Un r_ O O �n 06 O M M N O CU i 7 W CA O O CO M n r- T N N CA CO M O O M N 1� O Co O 1- O N M m CO Cp CD ti p 00 M CN O Ce) Ch'. O ci = M 69 69 EA m ta CO d' 64 M''. 69; M r CO N. 1- 64 m fiJ co W 69 W3 p O) 69 EA M 6S M co V) Cp I �T N 4) N 4) 4) 4) 4) 4) 4) I 6�, +. O a C 0 4) a N a 4) a 4) O 4) 4) 4) o o a N a N o a N 3 O` o O a a 4) 4) a 4) a a -0 d 4) 4) a 0) a: a 4) N a 4) a a 4) N 'p O O p O I N U O 4) 4) 4) N 4): 4) 4) 4) 4) 4) 4) 4) 3 E Kj Z Z, Z' Z W M Z Z Z Z, ZI Z Z Z Z Z Z Z m a M N d9 Q I� N Q N Q YA Q W O V> N to Q Q EI F Ny' Q h N Q Qi Q en Q N w Q Q N Q ca N Q Q I I f � I I V y 4 ) 'o a N Y � N; J c E O O C NI O E mI a a N o o a E m L m E c ly caV a CD l0 `° C Ru 9 Cl) a Q N V N 4) U) CL C6 m: an d a Q s Q o c m1 00)o D E_ fn m o . n. a t m m c m e a o in o m m 'd 4) a m y y Q° m t m a d s m m dpi @ o U m¢ c (A w 75 -ffi of m' a 4' m c o CL j °� o a D � `m °; Y m M d m > a O 0 o m o o a� y o o m fi i v m m o 7m N? LL N N H U o LL U N dmi N J m U X W Q S LL N J r O 0 0 0 0 0 0 O: O' 0 Cl 0 } Co 0 0 O� 7 L. (`j N O O O N N O C] O O O O'. 0 , O Cl) O v Co O' N 0 0 M 0 CD 0 0 0 O O O Q y O LL) CD n fA O O O r r r r r v O^ h n M f0 a') M CMO y fd O E v V - v 3 co Co CO co CO CO. c0 Co O M M st R '7; O N COs CO O O CA O CA O O ] O O O 00, O CO Co CO CL Z r CA O N N N N' NN M M M CM M N M C4 N M _O 0 0 0 Oli 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 � � �. fY RESOLUTION 2017- A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING PRECINCT POLLING LOCATIONS FOR THE 2018 ELECTIONS IN THE CITY OF HUGO, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA WHEREAS, there was a change made during the 2017 legislative session to State Statute 204.16 which discusses polling place designations; and, WHEREAS, state law now requires municipalities to designate precinct polling places for all elections for the year by December 31 of the prior year; and, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Hugo hereby designates precinct polling locations for 2018 as follows: Precinct 1 — Hugo Fire Department, 5323 140th Street North Precinct 2A and 2B — Oneka Elementary School, 4888 Heritage Parkway North Precinct 3A — Hugo City Hall, 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Precinct 3B — Rice Lake Center, 6900 137th Street North ADOPTED by the Hugo City Council this 6th day of November, 2017. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Agenda Number G3 CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Rachel Leitz, Community Development Assistant SUBJECT: Kevin Muramatsu. CUP Request for 5611 152nd Street North, Unit 3. DATE: October 27, 2017 for the City Council Meeting of November 6, 2017 ZONING: General Industrial (I-3) LAND USE: Industrial (IND) REVIEW DEADLINE: December 28, 2017 (Extended) 1. PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE: At its October 12, 2017, meeting the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the conditional use permit (CUP) request of Kevin Muramatsu. The Planning Commission considered the request while evaluating CUP standards and was comfortable with the applicant's request. No one spoke during the public hearing. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the CUP request for Kevin Muramatsu for property located at 5611 152nd St. N. Unit #3, with the conditions listed in the attached resolution. 2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for retail space as a supplementary use to the gunsmithing facility located at 5611 152nd Street North. 3. BACKGROUND: The property is within the Peloquin Industrial Park and currently has four units within an approximately 6,500 square foot building. Village Pine Custom Gunsmithing plans to take over the unit that once held Jim's Motorcycle Shop, which is a 2,000 square foot facility. In addition to the gunsmithing work, a permitted use within the General Industrial (I-3) zoning district, the applicant would like to utilize 25% of the floor area for retail sales of products. This request requires approval of a conditional use permit (CUP). Muramatsu CUP 4. PARKING EVALUATION: There are a variety of uses occurring within the units of the property. Staff evaluated the parking for the approximately 6,500 square foot building being used half as manufacturing and half as warehouse. Based on our ordinance, one parking space per 1,500 square feet of floor area is required for warehousing and one parking space per 500 square feet of floor area is required for manufacturing. For the 6,500 square foot building, approximately nine spots are required. With the addition of a retail component encompassing 400 square feet of the applicant's unit, two additional parking spaces would be required. The west and east side of the building currently have space for approximately 36 parking spots. There is also some on street parking available on Francesca Avenue for any overflow parking. It is in staff's opinion that the parking is adequate for the general use of the building and that adding a small retail component to the building will not adversely affect the parking needs on site. 4. LEVEL OF CITY DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or not the proposed application meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the conditional use permit. 6. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The property is within the Peloquin Industrial Park and is currently zoned General Industrial (I- 3). The property is guided for Industrial (IND) in the 2030 Land Use Plan. The surrounding properties are also zoned General Industrial (I-3) and are generally occupied by industrial business users. B. Natural Characteristics of Site The property is approximately 0.77 acres and is relatively flat. The building on the site is approximately 6,500 square feet and has four separate units within it. The property has a gravel parking/loading area surrounding the west, south, and east sides of the building. 7. ANALYSIS OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: A. Conditional Use Permit The City Council must review the application for a conditional use permit with the standards provided in Section 90-37 of Comprehensive Land Use Regulations. Staff used these standards to review the application and found that the request meets all applicable standards as follows: 1. The proposed use is permissible by law. Muramatsu CUP The proposed use is permissible by law. 2. The proposed use is keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to allow applicants the ability to offer a small area of retail, rental, or service to accompany the primary use of their business. The applicant's proposed business meets the purpose and permitted uses required in the General Industrial zoning district. It's in staff's opinion that the request for a CUP for retail sales meets the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 3. The proposed use is compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the character of the surrounding area. The use is appropriate for the property. The applicant's property and the neighboring properties are all industrial users within the Peloquin Industrial Park and offer a variety of services to the community. It is in staff's opinion that the use would not alter that the character of the area. 4. The proposed use has adequate drainage, water supply, electrical, gas, and sewage treatment facilities. Staff does not foresee any problems with utilities or drainage. 5. The proposed use has adequate road access. The property has adequate access to both Francesca Avenue N. and 152nd Street N. 6. Technical Evaluation of Floodplain. The applicant is not proposing to impact any floodplain. 7. The proposed use should not increase the potential for flood damage. The proposed use would not obstruct the floodplain or increase the potential for flooding. 8. The proposed use will not damage or reduce the benefits the public receives from public waters. The proposed use would not damage or reduce the benefits from any public waters. 9. The use of watercraft on public waters. The proposed use would not involve the use of watercraft on public waters. 10. All structures shall be screened from view of public waters. Muramatsu CUP The proposed use would not be visible from public waters. 11. Wetland impacts. The use would not impact any wetlands. 12. All state and local permits shall be acquired for the conditional use. The applicant would be responsible for obtaining all state and local permits. 13. Adequate screening and buffering from non -compatible uses and public rights-of-way. The use occupying unit #3 will have no exterior storage and the building is completely surrounded by similar industrial uses. 8. CONCLUSION The applicant would like to obtain a conditional use permit for 25% of the 2,000 square foot unit to accommodate retail space for their gunsmithing business. This request would not be out of character with the surrounding area. The applicant is asking to use the property in a reasonable manner. 9. RECOMMENDATION: It's in staff's opinion that the applicant meets all requirements necessary to approve a conditional use permit. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit for 400 square feet of retail space located in unit #3 of the property located at 5611 152nd Street North. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2. Site Map 3. Applicant Narrative 4. Applicant's Proposed Unit Layout 5. Conditional Use Permit RESOLUTION 2017 - APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR KEVIN MURAMATSU TO ALLOW RETAIL SPACE FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5611152ND STREET NORTH, UNIT #3 WHEREAS, Kevin Muramatsu has requested approval of a conditional use permit to allow up to 25 percent of retail space for the property located at 5611 152nd Street North, Unit #3. WHEREAS, the property is legally described as follows: (Please see attached) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has considered the request on October 12, 2017, at a duly called a public hearing and recommends approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the conditional use permit to allow up to 25 percent of retail space for the property located at 5611 152nd Street North, Unit #3, subject to the following findings: 1. The proposed use is allowed by conditional use permit. 2. The proposed use is allowed in the I-3 zoning district and will keep with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, which is intended to allow applicants the ability to offer a small area of retail, rental, or service to accompany the primary use of their business. The proposed use is compatible with the surrounding development and will not alter the character of the area. 3. The proposed use as adequate drainage, water supply, and utilized to the site. 4. The property has adequate access to both Francesca Avenue N. and 152nd Street N. 5. The proposed use would not obstruct the floodplain or increase the potential for flooding. 6. The proposed use would not damage or reduce the benefits from any public waters. 7. The proposed use would not involve the use of watercraft on public waters. 8. The proposed use would not be visible from public waters. 9. The proposed use does not impact any wetlands Resolution 2017 - Page 2 10. The applicant would be responsible for obtaining all state and local permits. 11. The proposed use is compatible with the adjacent developments. 12. This conditional use permit amendment shall supersede all prior conditional use permits and they shall no longer be on force or effect. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6' day of November, 2017. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk 5611 152nd Street North Site Map Site F Site Map N WE s !! L�w�!• esr�iie'i� 11 �' . U PW '1 J 4 VILLAGE PINE CUSTOM GUNSMITHING VILLAGE PINE Requested Narrative for Conditional Use Permit at 5611 152"d St. N, Unit 3, Hugo, MN 55038 Village Pine Custom Gunsmithing is a small, currently home-based, gunsmithing business in White Bear Township. We have been in business and federally licensed for almost seven years and desire to move into a commercial location. The largest portion of our revenue involves refinishing or OEM finishing of firearms by means of two types of industry specific paints. This includes work for three local manufacturers who sell their products across the nation and worldwide. Currently, a lesser portion of the revenue is based on more traditional gunsmithing work, such as cleanings, minor upgrades such as sight or scope installations, basic repairs, and accurizing, with roughly equivalent revenue generated by retail sales. Both the latter sources of revenue are expected to grow significantly with a storefront. The greatest obstacle to expansion is the lack of space, followed by public exposure. As such, the square footage at the unit in question is desirable, and generally more than adequate for our current and projected needs. As it is understood by VPCG, the previously noted sources of gunsmithing revenue are in line with the current zoning of the unit and building (Industrial). The CUP is understood to be necessary for the inclusion of a retail space for the supplementary sales of parts, firearms, and as an authorized display area for JP Enterprises (next building to the south). It should also be noted that official arrangements for this display are under negotiation and are not final, largely due to the absence of an actual, well assembled space in which to put the display. The objective is to provide a space where customers and potential customers can come and inspect JP merchandise, as getting hands on experience with an item generally results in a higher chance of a sale. Being adjacent to JP will certainly be a bonus as the only other "showroom" currently in existence is located at a store in Eden Prairie, and is also quite inferior to our planned display. JP has for years desired such a space, staffed by knowledgeable people. Previous attempts at other retail locations, such as Scheels and Joe's Sporting Goods were ineffective as the staff at those locations made no attempt to learn or sell the product, even discouraging its sale. Even if official arrangements are not authorized, having worked at JP Enterprises for six years prior to self-employment, being a JP authorized distributor, and having the desire to increase sales of JP products, we will still install a lesser display and proceed accordingly. Specific retail products will be tailored largely to the competition disciplines rather than to the general hunting or shooting environment, in which customers already have plenty of options. However, competition shooting is growing rapidly in Minnesota and Wisconsin, particularly in the disciplines of 3 -Gun (heavily serviced by JP) and Precision Rifle Series, which is a long -ranged type of event. Furthermore, trap and skeet shooting, always popular at any outdoor range, has also taken firm hold in Minnesota high schools. Thus, aftermarket high end parts such as triggers, optics, handguards, barrels, recoil compensation parts, and other upgrades will compose the bulk of the retail items. A small number of firearms manufactured for these events, particularly JP Enterprises rifles, will also be displayed and sold. In due time, we intend to showcase in lesser glory selected other local manufacturers' products, and if possible formal arrangements with these companies will also be pursued. This is the niche in which we believe success will be attained. It is the intent of VPCG to build an internal roofed retail structure inside the building with a standard ceiling height to measure no more than 400 square feet in area, out of a total of 2000 square feet. The remainder of the space will be dedicated to gunsmithing and machining work, and storage. This will not include office space, which is currently approximately 110 square feet, but may include a small hallway to allow access to the restroom as required under code. This final arrangement has yet to be specifically determined. It may also be necessary to move the office space to a different location in the building. We have provided updated floor plans to this effect. It is not expected that this restroom will see a great deal of use by the public as most customers will likely stay less than 15 minutes, long enough to drop off or pick up a work order, and/or to peruse the items for sale, much of which will be displayed behind the retail counter. Furthermore, to maintain an inviting, friendly, and productive working environment, the presence of loitering "hangers-on", "stool -sitters", and "gun -buddies", common in other small businesses of this type, will be pro -actively discouraged. We have always found this type of behavior and environment counterproductive and it often has the effect of alienating new customers. There is currently a substantial amount of parking available, if unmarked. There are approximately five to six spaces directly in front of the building for customer use and at least that many in the rear for staff use. Staff currently numbers two, and will grow, provided walk-in business increases as expected, although we do not foresee staffing to exceed four at any particular time. As the next unit in the building (unit 2) is currently unused for business, overflow parking can be placed in front of that unit as well, numbering another approximately three or four equivalent spaces. As of now, planned hours open to the public will be limited until business justifies a more expanded schedule (subject to any minimum hourly requirements the city may have concerning retail spaces). If the landlord allows it, and the city approves, a minimal external fagade, designed to elicit the feel of a small Japanese shop will eventually be considered, as will corresponding internal decoration. Otherwise, proceeding to replace the current motorcycle sign and corresponding sign on the street display will be required in relatively short order. If further information is required, please do not hesitate to contact me to obtain it. Such information will be amended to this letter and resubmitted. Best Regards, Kevin Muramatsu, Owner 651-815-5261 kevin@villagepinecustom.com 407611� t i 7t -- fly '00) c DO rz A crQ eb L -4- 7Z 1W u L j LJ CITY OF HUGO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DATE OF APPROVAL: November 6, 2017 APPLICANT: Kevin Muramatsu 1714 Pioneer Lane White Bear Township, MN 55110 OWNER: Terry Granger 4900 Gallivan Court North White Bear Lake, MN 55110 ADDRESS FOR WHICH CUP IS GRANTED: 5611 152nd Street North Unit #3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit A ZONING DISTRICT: General Industrial (I-3) THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWS FOR THE FOLLOWING: A retail area that will accompany the primary business use and is no larger than 25 percent of the 2,000 square foot unit. THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. No more than 25 percent of the total square footage of the unit may constitute retail space. 2. The applicant shall pay the applicable sewer and water charges. 3. The applicant shall apply for necessary building permits for any exterior or interior building modifications. These modifications shall meet all building code requirements. 4. There shall be no exterior storage for the gunsmithing operation. 5. The unit shall maintain at least nine (9) parking spaces for the use of the business. Four (4) of these spots for the future planned growth of staff members and five (5) spots for customers. Tom Weidt, Mayor — — STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) ss. On this day of , before Public, personally appeared Tom Weidt, Mayor of the C y0lof Hugo, aeMinnesoty municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Hugo by the authority of the City Council of the City of Hugo, and Tom Weidt, mayor, acknowledge said instrumentof said Cit to be the free act and deed Hugo.y of Notary public Dated: , 2017. Title STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this day of , 2017, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared , to me known as the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, who stated that they are the owners of the property this permit applies to, and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public This document was drafted by: Hugo City Council 14669 Fitzgerald Ave N Hugo, MN 55038 This Conditional Use Permit supersedes any Permits for this use that were previously recorded. RESOLUTION NO. CITY OF HUGO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO ALL OR PORTIONS OF ROADWAYS IDENTIFIED AS THE ONEKAL LAKE BOULEVARD AND HARROW AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, it is proposed to improve 250t" Street from Goodview Avenue to approximately 300 -ft east of Harrow Avenue and Harrow Avenue from Oneka Lake Boulevard to 165t" Street and to potentially assess the benefited property for a portion of the cost of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUGO, MINNESOTA: That the proposed improvement for study be ordered and that the engineer is instructed to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels. This resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Hugo on the 6' day of November, 2017, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. ATTEST: Tom Weidt, Mayor Michele Lindau, City Clerk (seal) I.1 CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Application Request TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Rachel Juba, Planner SUBJECT: The Lincoln Group. Request for a sketch plan review of "Creekside Heights" consisting of 251 residential homes on 132 Acres east of Highway 61 and west of Oneka Lake. DATE: November 2, 2017 for the City Council Meeting of November 6, 2017 REVIEW DEADLINE (120 -days): December 29, 2017 PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE: At its October 12, 2017, meeting the Planning Commission reviewed and provided comments on the sketch plan. Staff provided background to the Planning Commission and outlined several items that are recommended to be incorporated into the plan in order to meet the intent of the City's Comprehensive Plan and PUD ordinance. The Commission agreed that the intersection of 159th Street and Highway 61 is important to the development and the design needs to take into consideration the access to the properties north and south of the intersection. They stated that they had concerns with traffic flow, since Phase 1 did not have an outlet to Highway 61. The Commission encouraged that the phasing plan be revised to allow access out to Highway 61 with all of Phase 1. They generally liked the roundabout as an option for traffic control, but questioned the design that was presented in the sketch plan. The Commission strongly encouraged stormwater re -use for irrigation incorporated into the development. The developer agreed. The Commission was concerned with the townhomes being too close to the industrial uses along Highway 61, without an adequate buffer. It was encouraged that the applicant work on revising the lot layout to further buffer the townhomes from the industrial uses. The Commission expressed concerns with the tree removal on the south end of the site and wanted to see more detail on what would be preserved and removed. They encouraged the applicant preserve a large portion of the trees. The Commission recognized the difficulties with developing the property and was generally comfortable with a PUD request for the development. However, they commented that the applicant should work with staff on the bulleted items outlined by staff in the review process. It was noted this may mean a new evaluation of the development layout. They encouraged the applicant to work on the items, make revisions, and return to the Planning Commission with a new sketch plan. 2. PARKS COMMISSION UPDATE: At its October 18, 2017, meeting the Parks Commission reviewed and provided comments on the sketch plan. The Commission was generally supportive of a fishing pier/dock but would like consideration of how it could be accessed and used by the public. This includes looking at off-street and on -street parking and trying to find adjacent upland to add amenities like a picnic shelter, table, etc. It is envisioned that people may want to drive to the access and put in a kayak or other watercraft. One idea was to locate the fishing pier/dock at the south end of the property so that it could possibly be accessed off of the Oneka Lake Park property. After being asked about maintenance, the developer indicated that it is likely the HOA would maintain the trails. When asked about preserving the trees at the south end of the property, the developer indicated that there will be trees lost to make the necessary roadway connections. It was also said that the southern cul-de-sac may need to be shortened to preserve additional trees. Another comment by the Commission was to provide an additional pedestrian access to the cluster of townhouses. It was noted that the townhouse cluster is quite separate from the rest of the neighborhood. If the market of the townhouses would be families, one Commissioner asked for consideration of a Tot Lot because it is so removed from the other parts of the neighborhood and accessing the park. The Commission was generally very supportive of all of the trails in the development, stating they provide great loops and the necessary access to other trails/existing park. It was mentioned that a trail connection to the properties to the north is important in case of possible future development. It was also mentioned that the roundabout or Highway 61 crossing is evaluated to make the pedestrian crossing to the Hardwood Creek Trail and 159th Street trail safe. The Commission was generally supportive of the park dedication proposal. They seemed interested in accepting the trail area and any other buildable, useable and attached parcels. This would be a minimal amount of land and the remainder would be a fee. 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting comments on a sketch plan for a subdivision of the 132 -acre site and development of 251 housing units. The housing units are proposed to be a combination of single family, villas, and townhomes. The gross density is 1.9 units per acre and the net density is 3 units per acre. The property is currently vacant and does contain some challenges regarding wetlands, an existing drainage ditch and high ground water. The applicant would like to get feedback from the City Council on the project in regards to the general layout, road circulation, park dedication, and access. 4. CONTEXT: A. Level of City Discretion in Decision -Making The City's comments on a sketch plan are advisory only and non-binding. B. Land Use and Zoning The subject property is located within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA) boundary. The property is currently zoned Single Family Detached Residential (R-3) and Future Urban Service (FUS) with a portion of the property along Highway 61 zoned General Business (C-2). Most of the property is guided as Low Density Residential (LD) with a small portion along Highway 61 guided as Commercial (COM). C. Natural Characteristics of the Site The subject property is located within the shoreland overlay district for Oneka Lake. Floodplain areas are located on the site generally near the drainage ditch. There are approximately 25 acres of wetland and a significant stand of trees to the south. 5. BACKGROUND: A. Previous Sketch Plan Review The Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed a number of sketch plans for this property, including developments to be called "Del Webb" and "Oneka Shores". The previous projects were significantly larger and included additional property to the south and north of 165`h Street. During the previous sketch plan review processes, the City discussed the importance of access to Highway 61 with the development and determining the proper intersection design. There were portions of commercial property within the sketch plan and the City encouraged the applicant to incorporate and plan the commercial property into the project. The City also encouraged the preservation of the natural resources, including the stand of trees on the southern portion of the project. B. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Due to the size of the project, the previous applicant was required to complete an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed development on this site. The purpose of the EAW is to identify potential environmental impacts for a specific development and to determine whether or not a more extensive Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is required. Environmental impacts include impacts to surface waters, natural areas, utilities, transportation systems, historic sites, noise impacts, etc. The EAW for the proposed development of this site was completed in February 2006 and distributed to various agencies for public comment. The City Council reviewed the EAW and the comments received at their May 1, 2006 meeting and determined that an EIS was not needed for the project. Since this plan is similar, but much smaller, a new EAW will not be required. However, as this project progresses, staff will need to ensure that the assumptions of the EAW are still valid. 6. ANALYSIS: Consistency with Ordinance Standards A. Process The applicant is requesting sketch plan comments prior to formal submittal. The next steps for the applicant would be as follows; 1. Submit a request for approval of the following Preliminary applications: a. PUD General Plan/Rezoning to PUD b. Preliminary Plat The applicant would develop plans based on the sketch plan comments and submit the abovementioned applications. The application would require a public hearing at the Planning Commission and City Council action. 2. Submit a request for Final Plat and PUD Final Plan If the City approves the preliminary requests the applicant may submit final plans. The final plat would only be approved by the City Council. B. Sketch Plan The Lincoln Group is planning to develop five parcels of land, which are owned by various property owners. The applicant has submitted affidavits that they have secured agreements for the Premier Bank property (68 acres), the Michael Riopel property (59 acres), the Thomas and Sandra Dreshar property (3 acres), and the Xcel Energy property (3 acres). The total project area on the sketch plan shows 132 acres. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the five parcels for a residential development. Staff will be working with the applicant on how to best plan the remaining outlots as far as use and ownership. The applicant will be requesting a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for the Creekside Heights development. The plan shows 251 proposed residential lots, stormwater ponding areas, openspace, sidewalk and trail connections, and road connections. Although it is not shown on the plans, the applicant has indicated that there would be a dock constructed to extend into Oneka Lake for public use. The developer has indicated that an HOA will be established for the development to maintain community areas and landscaping. The sketch plan shows three housing product types: single family homes, maintenance provided villas, and maintenance provided townhomes. The townhomes are shown to the northwest of the site. Staff does have concerns on the buffer between the townhomes and the industrial uses to the west. Although the landscape plan shows a landscape buffer, staff recommends the applicant review the townhome lot layout to provide further separation from the industrial uses. The villa product is shown along Oneka Lake and on the west side of the project. There is not a good transition from the villa product and single family homes. Staff recommends the applicant consider clustering the villa products to a section of the project and provide appropriate transitions between the product types. Planned Unit Development The Lincoln Group will be requesting an approval of a PUD for the Creekside Heights development. PUD's offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of zoning district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater variety of uses, internal transfers of density, construction phasing, and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of other, more standard zoning districts. The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 132 -acre site to create 251 residential home sites. The R-3 zoning district requires a minimum lot width of 80 feet. The applicant is proposing a combination of product types and lot widths listed below: Product Type Proposed Lot Width Proposed No. of Lots Single Family Homes 65 feet 136 Villa Homes 55 feet 76 Townhomes 30 feet 44 The applicant is proposing the following setbacks: Single Family and Villa Homes Yard R-3 Zoning District Minimum Proposed Setbacks Front 30 feet 25 feet Side 10 feet 7.5 feet (15 feet total between homes) Rear 30 feet 25 feet It's unclear from the sketch plan and information provided by the applicant how the setbacks would be applied to the townhomes. Further, it is hard to determine the setbacks because the townhomes are usually surrounded by common open space. Staff will continue to work with the applicant on the setbacks for the townhomes. However, staff does recommend at least 30 feet between multi-level townhome buildings. This is consistent with other townhome projects in Hugo. The maximum development density for a PUD in the R-3 zoning district is 4 units per 1 acre. The applicant is proposing a residential net density of 3 units per 1 acre, which fits the requirements of a PUD. Although the applicant is requesting flexibility on lot sizes and setbacks, the density meets the ordinance standards. The shoreland district comes in effect for all homes located within 1000 feet of the ordinary high-water (OHW) level of Oneka Lake. Oneka Lake is classified as a natural environment lake. The City's shoreland overlay district ordinance requires 20,000 square foot minimum lot size, 125 -foot minimum lot width, maximum 25 -foot building height, and maximum 25 percent impervious surface coverage for non -riparian lots. The proposed lots do not meet the requirements, but flexibility may be allowed with a PUD. The DNR PUD standards also apply to this development and the applicant will be required to demonstrate they have satisfied the requirements. It should be noted that all of the lots shown on the sketch plan are non -riparian lots as the applicant has retained public open space and a trail adjacent to the lake. Detailed review of any flexibility would be required as part of the PUD General Plan review. In exchange for the proposed PUD, the sketch plan offers a proposed trail along the road and a connection that will link to the existing trail in the Oneka Ponds development. The project will offer additional sidewalk connections within the development, as well. The plan shows open space along Oneka Lake with multi -use trails and a dock extending into Oneka Lake. The applicant has indicated that the trails and dock would be public. Although the applicant has done a good job incorporating public uses within the development, more detail on how the applicant exceeds City standards and meets the requirements of a PUD will be required with the Preliminary Plat and PUD General Plan. Phasing It's unclear how many phases there will be with the development, however the applicant is proposing what would be completed in the first phase. Phase one includes 44 townhome lots on the northern portion of the site with a connection to Highway 61. Phase one also includes 71 residential lots on the southern portion of the site with a connection to Goodview Trail. The southern portion of phase one would not have a connection to Highway 61. Because the proposed phasing includes a substantial portion of the site being developed with the majority of phase one traffic traveling south on Goodview Avenue and Goodview Trail, it is in staff's opinion that all lots in phase one should include a connection and access out to Highway 61. Equally as important, are the utilities in regards to the phasing plan. It is not clear how the applicant intends to serve the townhomes on the north side with Phase 1. The phasing plan should be revised to take into consideration the construction of utilities. Wetlands The site has approximately 25 acres of wetlands. A wetland delineation has been approved by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) for a large portion of the site. There is an application for a wetland delineation for the Michael Riopel property which is west of Oneka Lake. Final approval of the delineation is expected in the near future. Additionally, there is a portion of the sketch plan, along Highway 61, where a wetland delineation has not been completed. A wetland delineation will need to be approved for all properties within the development for Preliminary Plat and PUD General Plan approval. The proposed development will impact a small portion of the wetland areas. An impact and mitigation plan will need to be submitted for review and approval by the City. Woodlands There is a large stand of pine trees along the southern boundary of the sketch plan, adjacent to the Oneka Ponds development. A portion of the trees appear to be shown on the plan. However, it is unclear how or what amount that will be removed or preserved. The applicant will be required to submit a tree inventory and a tree preservation plan with the Preliminary Plat and PUD General Plan. In exchange for PUD flexibility, the City should expect this development to preserve a significant portion of the trees on the site, particularly along the southern boundary. Floodplain A portion of the property is located within the floodplain district. The FEMA floodplain map designates the area around the ditch on the site as a "Zone AE" area with a regulatory floodplain elevation of 930. It is likely that the proposed grading will impact the floodplain and the applicant will need to work with City Engineer during the permit process to mitigate any proposed impacts. Housing Types The plans indicate that all of the villa homes and townhomes will consist of slab on grade units with no basements. The single family homes are proposed to be constructed with walkout and lookout basements. The applicant has provided preliminary elevations, but no material details or samples. These items would need to be reviewed as part of the preliminary plat. The applicant will be required to comply with the Multi -Family Design Guidelines for those portions of the development. Streets & Access The applicant is proposing one access onto Highway 61 at 159th Street. Per the City's Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with MnDOT and Washington County, this intersection is planned to be a full intersection, with no median, when Highway 61 is expanded. The applicant has completed a traffic study for the proposed development. The traffic study concluded that traffic control improvements may be necessary at Highway 61 and 159th Street, as the project reaches full build out. As the development project proceeds, improvements to Highway 61 may be required based on the anticipated traffic. Potential improvements may include turn lanes on Highway 61 or improvements to existing intersections, and would be based on the traffic study and input from MnDOT. Staff has been working with the applicant and MnDOT on what improvements would be needed for the intersection. The sketch plan shows a roundabout as the intersection improvement. Staff agrees that this improvement is the best option for the intersection. The following primary issues have been identified for further discussion if the project moves forward: An Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) shall be completed for the intersection. MnDOT has stated that if traffic control improvements are needed at the Highway 61 and 159th Street intersection by 2023, they may support the installation of a roundabout. If not, the improvement would be the installation of turn lanes, which would be setting the intersection up for a traffic signal (not a roundabout) in the future. If turn lanes are required to be installed as the traffic control improvement, it will be a requirement that access into the development has direct alignment across from 159th Street. The roundabout option allows for some flexibility with this alignment. The applicant must receive a permit from MnDOT and Washington County for the intersection improvement. This means, these entities will need to review and approve the improvement, alignment, and design. The property along Highway 61, that is zoned commercial with industrial uses, should be planned with the development. This is important not only because access to the properties needs to be provided, but this is the main entrance into the development from Highway 61. The applicant does not necessary need to have commercial incorporated in the project, but staff will need to fully understand how the properties continue to, or will function with the proposed development. The applicant is proposing to connect to Goodview Trail and Goodview Avenue from Oneka Ponds on the south side of the development to extend to the northern boundary. The applicant should work closely with staff to limit access from residential lots to Goodview Avenue, as it's a collector road, and provide good screening for the yards that would abut the street. The City and applicant should also discuss streetscaping along Goodview Avenue and 159th Street as the main accesses into the development. The sketch plan shows 159th Street and Goodview Avenue directly abuting the neighboring property to the northwest. This is a long length of road to be constructed without lots connected to them. There may be a more efficient way to connect the development to the neighboring properties. Staff has recommend that all of phase one should have an outlet to Highway 61. One idea is to cross the ditch at a different location so the length of the road to be constructed with phase one could be shortened. Staff recommends the applicant continue to work with staff on the road alignments and connections. Although not entirely clear to staff, it appears that all of the proposed streets within the development are public streets. The City typically requires 80 -foot right-of-way for collector streets and 60 -foot right -of way for new local streets. However, the right-of-way and street widths will need to be reviewed in detail with a preliminary plat. The sketch plan shows a road crossing the private ditch to access the eastern portion of the development. The applicant will need to work with the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) on the design of the road crossing. The applicant may be required to install a bridge or culvert. Coordination with RCWD should be completed as soon as possible to ensure the City and the applicant understands what will be required by RCWD. Utilities The applicant will be required to provide municipal water and sewer to the site. Services are available to the south. Sanitary Sewer The site is all in one sewer district in the City's Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. Municipal sanitary sewer service is available for the site by direct connection to the existing systems within Goodview Trail and Goodview Avenue from the Oneka Ponds development. Water Municipal water service is available by connecting to the existing system along the south side of the site. The development of this site will provide an opportunity to complete an additional east - west trunk loop across 1591h Street as outlined in the City's Comprehensive Water Supply Plan. The connection across 159th Street should be incorporated into the plan. Utility Line The plans show a 50 -foot utility line easement bisecting the site. However, the utility line is not an easement. It is actually a separate lot of record, owned by Northern States Power/Xcel Energy. The utility company will need to be part of the plat. The applicant must work with the utility company to receive all necessary approvals. Its staff's understanding that the applicant has been in contact with the energy company. Stormwater Management There is a private ditch that runs through the site. Groundwater within the site has the potential to be relatively high, which will require additional analysis to be completed before finalizing the grading plan and low -floor elevations. Ponding for water quality and rate control will be required on site and must be compliant with City standards. In addition, staff has discussed with the applicant the option of using stormwater for irrigation of landscapes and yards. The applicant has indicated that they did not incorporate water re -use into the project. Staff encouraged the applicant to incorporate water re -use into the project, using stormwater for irrigation, especially the areas with common space and shared maintenance. Open Space / Park Dedication The development will include approximately 38 acres of open space, but it's unclear how much usable open space is provided. The applicant intends to dedicate a portion of the open space along Oneka Lake to the City as public parkland. Staff recommends all of the open space along Oneka Lake be dedicated as public open space. The open space will function as an extension of the public park to the south of the site and provide a green corridor along Oneka Lake. The ordinance requires 10 percent of the net land to be dedicated as public park or cash -in -lieu of land. The Parks Commission will need to review and comment on the desirability of the proposed park dedication. Sidewalks and Trails The applicant is proposing approximately 1.5 miles of trails within the development. Sidewalks will also be required within the development, per City Code, for all streets with lots less than 80 feet wide. This means that nearly all of the streets within the development would have sidewalks. The sketch plan is showing a trail to be constructed along Goodview Avenue, connecting to the existing trail in the Oneka Ponds development to the south. The trail is then shown to connect to the Hardwood Creek Trail along Highway 61. The sketch plan also shows a trail along Oneka Lake that would provide a connection to the public park to the south. The trail is shown to extend from both main entrances into the development, from Highway 61 and Goodview Avenue, to the lake front trail. The applicant has indicated a dock would be constructed on Oneka Lake and a connection would be made to the lakefront trail. The sketch plan is showing a trail running between two lots to connect to the lakefront trail. Staff likes this idea, however, would recommend that the areas be further planned to create a visual opening to the lake. This may mean widening the space and planning the area. Landscaping The applicant has provided a landscape plan. The plan generally exceeds the ordinance standards. In exchange for PUD flexibility, the City could expect a landscape plan that goes beyond the minimum requirements to provide street trees, entrance streetscaping, plantings around a monument sign, plantings in openspace, etc. 7. CONCLUSION/ STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff believes that the layout of the proposed development is generally good. The applicant has done a good job providing a mix of housing products, openspace, and trail connections. However, staff does recommend the following to be incorporated into the plan: 1. Clustering of the Villa Home product and/or providing adequate transitions between product types. 2. Provide a more significant buffer for the townhomes to be separate from the industrial uses to the west. 3. The phasing should be revised to include the connection and development outlet to Highway 61. Evaluation of the phasing of the full built out should be provided. 4. Stormwater Re -Use for irrigation. 5. The applicant should continue to work with staff on the road alignments, more specifically on the northwest portion of the site. 6. Planning of the commercial properties along Highway 61, adjacent to the main entrance to the development. 7. The trail corridor that meanders through two residential lots should be widened to provide a view of the lake to create an entrance to the lakefront trail. 8. Provide a tree inventory and plan for what trees will be preserved and removed. Specifically on the south boundary. 9. Full description of the park land dedication request. Staff recommends the City Council review and discuss the sketch plan and provide the applicant with informal comments. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Applicants Narrative 3. City Engineers Memo dated November 1, 2017. 4. Sketch Plan 5. Elevation Examples 0 OW -C.1% r& Goorl vievv 152nd 151st mm A, 11 2:1 152rl Cl) C/) r. LO �h jjWt,)rlUKd lZdKfd NARRATIVE CONCEPTUAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION CREEKSIDE HEIGHTS DEVELOPMENT The Lincoln Group, Inc., a Minnesota Corporation, is proud to present for your consideration the Conceptual Plan for a new Planned Unit Development in Hugo, Minnesota called Creekside Heights. This assembly of three properties totaling approximately 127 acres is located between State Highway 61 and Oneka Lake at 1591h Street. One parcel (68.2 acres) is currently owned by Premier Bank, Inc., and two parcels (19.57 and 39.6 acres) currently owned by Michael Riopel. The existing parcels are currently zoned Agricultural and guided R1. Currently there exists tillable agricultural on the Riopel parcels and non -tillable agricultural on the Premier parcel. The properties are maintained and the property taxes are current. The Lincoln Group, Inc. is an association of local professionals with an extensive background in real estate acquisition, development, entitlement, design build and new construction sales. The Lincoln Group's vision is to create a diverse and exciting neighborhood consisting of 44 multi-level townhomes designed to meet the needs of the first time home buyer, 136 single family homes situated on 65' wide lots designed to meet the needs of a wide array of buyers, and finally 76 age -targeted villa homes featuring main -level living situated on 55' wide lots designed to accommodate the needs of our aging demographic. Planned Unit Development Zoning The Lincoln Group, Inc. is requesting a Planned Unit Development due to the varied product type designed to satisfy an array of housing needs in the City of Hugo, which the typical R-3 zoning would not readily accommodate. Additionally, the site presents unique challenges and non -typical physical characteristics including the Oneka Lake shoreline, the lake itself, extensive wetlands, the existence of a major drainage channel and an Xcel Energy transmission line easement bisecting the site. Flexibility in zoning is therefore critical to the successful development of this property. The Lincoln Group is specifically asking for reduced minimum lot sizes and widths, reduced front and side yard setbacks, and increased lot coverage primarily to deal with the constraints of the site layout and to improve our ability to preserve and accentuate the site's physical characteristics and natural features. Reduced lot sizes and adjusted setbacks will allow us to save additional trees and provide the lot size and types that today's buyers are seeking, as well as helping provide multiple housing types and diversity of construction. As part of this proposal, Lincoln Group is seeking to maximize the amount of naturally occurring wetlands and open spaces that will remain undisturbed by this development. Of the more than 25 acres of existing wetlands on this site, we are currently estimating that less than 1 acre of wetland will be impacted by development. We are currently proposing to mitigate this loss by 1 creating an additional 1.7 acres of new wetland in protected areas. In all, the completed development will feature more than 43 acres of public and common open space area. The Lincoln Group is also proposing to construct multi -use trails along the Oneka Lake shoreline and along selected other areas of the development. In all, over 1.7 miles of new asphalt trails are proposed as part of this conceptual plan, as well as a new dock on Oneka Lake. The proposed Planned Unit Development will meet city standards required for approval by dedicating to the City additional open space, trails and outlots as shown on the conceptual plat in exchange for a credit against future Park Dedication fees. This application meets the density requirements according to City ordinances. The following table outlines the requested variances to be include in the PUD. R-3 SINGLE SINGLE CRITERIA FAMILY ; FAMILY STANDARD PUD LOT FRONT SETBACK SIDE SETBACK REAR SETBACK LOT WIDTH AT SETBACK LOT AREA MAXIMUM BUILDING COVERAGE Maintenance and Governance 30 FT 25 FT 10 FT 7.5 FT 30 FT 25 FT 80 FT 55 FT VILLA TOWNHOME PUD PUD LOT LOT 25 FT 0 FT 7.5 FT 5 FT 25 FT 55FT 10,400 SF 8,090 SF 7,420 SF 30% 31% 39% 10 FT 30 FT - 1950 SF 85% The Lincoln Group, Inc. proposes a Master Homeowners Association governing the entire development consisting of sub -associations governing the Villa and Townhome neighborhoods. The intention of a master would be to provide continuity for regulating the areas common features and maintaining neighborhood monuments, trails, docks and assistance with storm water management. In addition the Master Association covenants would govern and regulate access to adjoining wetlands. ig The sub -association for the townhome neighborhood would provide maintenance of common areas and building exteriors, including a reserve fund, underground sprinkler system, snow removal and lawn care, sanitation removal and hazard insurance. The sub -association for the Villa neighborhood would provide maintenance of common areas, underground sprinkler system and sanitation removal. Development Phasin Creekside Heights would include five phases (see phasing plan) with the primary entrance to the townhomes being off of Highway 61 at 159th Street. Accommodation for this entry requires continued negotiation with the property owners on either side of the existing connection between the PUD parcel and Highway 61. The goal would be to limit construction and sales traffic to that entrance in an effort to minimize the effect to the neighborhood adjoining Goodview Avenue and Goodview Trail to the south of the site. The second part of Phase 1 would consist of single family homes and villas along the south property line which would temporarily access from Goodview Avenue and Goodview Trail until the northerly connection of 159th Street from Highway 61 to Goodview Avenue, which would be included in Phase II. At the recommendation of the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), we are currently proposing the intersection of the entrance road at Highway 61 to be constructed as a roundabout of similar design to the intersection of 170th and Highway 61 (North Forest Boulevard) located just 1.25 miles to the north. The proposed roundabout will vary somewhat in that it will feature five legs instead of four, one of which is the commercial entrance to the Industrial Utilities site. We invite your questions and or concerns and look forward to discussing this matter in further detail. Sincerely, Daniel P. Lincoln President, The Lincoln Group, Inc. Building a legacy — your legacy. 701 Xenia Avenue South Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55416 Tel: 763-541-4800 Fax: 763-541-1700 November 1, 2017 Ms. Rachel Juba City Planner City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Concept Plan Review Creekside Heights WSB Project No. 3288-12 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the concept plan for the proposed Creekside Heights Development located east of TH 61 near 159th Street. The property's south border is at the northern extent of Goodview Avenue and Goodview Trail. Our review is based on the Sketch Plan submitted by the Lincoln Group with the "last plotted date" of 7/25/17. We will provide a more in-depth review of this project once detailed plans are provided by the applicant. Based on our review, we offer the following comments regarding the concept plan: Grading and Drainage 1. Wetlands: The site contains extensive wetlands. A wetland delineation was performed on April 4, 2017 with revisions dated July 24, 2017 and August 29, 2017 based on the Technical Evaluation Panels comments. Wetland boundaries have been modified to meet the Technical Evaluation Panels comments. An approval based on the revised delineations is expected to be issued in the near future. The applicant will need to continue to work with the TEP and the City Water Resources Engineer as the project moves forward to obtain the necessary permit(s) related to the wetland delineation, sequencing, and mitigation within the site. A trail is proposed along the top of the ice ridge on the east side of the property along Oneka Lake. the wetland boundary is located at the toe of the slope on both the east and west edges of the ice ridge where the trail is proposed. Approval of the trail, will be contingent on the design. If it can be designed in a way that doesn't impact the existing wetlands, a trail could be feasible in this location. Site Grading/Low-floor Elevations: The site is relatively flat. A private lateral ditch discharges through the center of the site from north to south. The proposed crossing of this ditch will need to meet all RCWD permitting requirements. The groundwater within the site has the potential to be relatively shallow which will require that additional analysis be completed before finalizing the grading plan and low -floor elevations. Equal Opportunity Employer wsbeng.com K: 03288-120�Admin �Docs�Concept Plan X3288-120 COM LTR -r juba-110117-CreeksideConcept. docx Ms. Rachel Juba October 6, 2017 Page 2 Storm Water Management: The applicant will need to obtain a permit from the City for their Storm Water Management Plan within the site, including the appropriate storage, rate control, treatment, and volume reduction. There is a high likelihood that the site can support water reuse, and this should be explored in greater detail moving forward. Credit to the trunk area water fees is determined based on the amount of water reuse utilized within the project area. Transportation/Traffic 1. Roadway Connections: As we review the roadway connections within the area, there are a number of current roadways (Goodview Avenue and Goodview Trail) that will be connected to the proposed development that were anticipated when previous development occurred. This will result in changes to traffic volumes on roadways within the adjacent neighborhoods, which will be reviewed as part of the traffic study. 2. Highway 61: The long-range plan for Highway 61, completed in 2008, includes the following for Highway 61 adjacent to the proposed development: • Four -lane divided roadway • 150 feet of total right-of-way width, with an additional 39 feet required within the development property • Full access at 159th Street As the development proceeds, improvements on Highway 61 will be required based on anticipated traffic. Improvements would include the addition of a northbound right turn lane and a southbound left turn lane on Highway 61 or a roundabout at the 159th and TH 61 intersection. Continued information gathering on traffic and associated Intersection Control Evaluation is ongoing by the applicant and coordination with MNDOT and the City will be necessary. The location of Industrial Utilities makes the intersection improvements somewhat challenging. A roundabout allows more flexibility for the intersection alignment, provided it meets MNDOT criteria. Sanitary Sewer Service City Sewer Districts: Sanitary sewer service is available for the southerly portion of the site by direct connection to the existing systems within Goodview Avenue, Goodview Trail and the trunk main located in the SW corner of the property. Water Service 1. Trunk Watermain Improvements: Water service is available by connecting to the existing systems along the south (Goodview Avenue and Goodview Trail), and west side of the site at 159th Street. The development as proposed will require the connection to the watermain with 1591h Street on the west side of TH 61. This 12 -inch connection is outlined in the City's Comprehensive Water Supply Plan and will loop the system from Goodview Avenue to 1591h Street. Phasing 1. The phasing proposed includes a substantial portion of the site being developed with the majority of phase 1 traffic being required to travel to the south on Goodview Avenue and Goodview Trail due to no K: 03288-120�Admin�Docs� Concept Plan X3288-120 COM LTR-rjuba-110117-CreeksideConcept.docx Ms. Rachel Juba October 6, 2017 Page 3 connectivity of road infrastructure to TH 61 with phase 1. It is recommended that phase 1 include connectivity to TH 61. 2. Sanitary sewer service to the townhome portion of phase one will require the extension of sanitary sewer through a future phase and across the ditch as currently planned. It is not clear how the developer proposes to bring water service to the Townhome portion of phase 1 as there is not yet watermain shown extending from 1591h Street at TH 61 and a significant extension of watermain would need to be constructed through future phases as currently shown. A ditch crossing is not currently identified. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this concept plan. If you have any questions or items you wish to discuss, you can contact me at 651-286-8463. Sincerely, WSB & Associates, Inc. Mark Erichson, PE City Engineer Attachment cc: Steve Duff, Senior Engineering Technician, City of Hugo Scott Anderson, Public Works Director, City of Hugo Danny Lincoln, Lincoln Group, Inc. K: 03288-120�Admin �Docs�Concept Plan X3288-120 COM LTR -r juba-110117-CreeksideConcept. docx Sketch PUD Plans for Plat, Grading, Streets, Utilities, and Landscaping for Creekside Heights Hugo, MN PREPARED FOR: The Lincoln Group, Inc. 7475 Flying Cloud Drive, Suite 202 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Contact: Danny Lincoln Phone: 651.955.7172 PREPARED BY: Kaskaskia Engineering Group, LLC PROFESSIONAL REGISTRATIONS Minnesota Professional Design Firm 2550 Umvecstty Avenue West, Suite 1615 St. Paul, Minnesota 55114 615.337.5652phone 618.233.5977 fax w Jmskaskiaengcom LICENSE NO. 688435000021 Sheet Number Sheet Title 1 COVER 2 EXISTING CONDITIONS 3 - 6 SKETCH PLAT 7 SKETCH PHASING AND EXISTING OWNERSHIP PLAN 8 WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN 9 SHORELAND AREA PLAN 10FLOODPLAIN AREA PLAN 11 - 17 SKETCH GRADING, DRAINAGE AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN 18-24 SKETCH STORM SEWER PLAN 25-31 SKETCH UTILITY PLAN 32-50 SKETCH STREET PLAN AND PROFILE 51 -54 SKETCH LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING PLAN 55 -61 DETAILS VICINITY MAP PROJECT SITE A r : - I v � a (NOT TO SCALE) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Sketch PUD Plans for Plat, Grading, Streets, Utilities, and Landscaping for Creekside Heights Hugo, MN Date: 7/21/2017 Sheet: 1 of 61 Outlot 0 = LS 6 / od z - /�� ® 0 Z " ,� �, 0 1 Z I / men en W ®�n00 � a LU � I / 0 / o 0 0 z " 0 Outlot / CR 1 - _ _ - ' C) � W v' W 0 w Qno a / a SEAL / o Outlot / Signature: Y ' Expiration Date: 00/00/20XX m W /- 3 2 2 0� / LEGEND I SINGLE FAMILY I Q w TOWNHOME WETLAND O DETENTION AREA W 'U w / OUTLOT W �" ROAD AND TRAIL H / E., i I U 150 0 150 300 DATE OF FINAL: HORIZONTAL: 1"=150' REV. DATE DESCRIP 0 DRAWN BY: 0 CHECKED RLW BY: ATE OF PRELIMINARY oo/oo/zoxx LAST PLOTTED: 7/25/2017 2:03 PM OPERATOR: SMS DESIGNED pL�; SHEET BY: DRAWN BY: CHECKED RLW BY: ATE OF PRELIMINARY oo/oo/zoxx oo/oo/zoxx SHEET N0. _ OF _ SHEETS PROJECT NUMBER 16-1067 N 88°46'09" E, / 934- - S 89 8i0",E 1011.0 North line of the Northeast OU rte, of Section 17. _ — N- of Section -/380.09 ' • line of 2 NORTH LINE OF SECTION iv., TW TWPf-3J, R. 21 P I, 3?• 17, TWP, 31, R. 27 O I U/ O v n \g34i x / f ' I NORTH J4 OF THE SE 1/4 SUBJECT TO A TRANSMISSION LINE � EASEMENT PER BO K 142 OF DEEDS, PAGE 154 ^ I (D W O a / 6 ye e I 938/ / r 0 /m m° 4 —NE c s described) s describe? / �l °jam } in Docn No�400507 S�carDner °IN o. 338569 \ I `� r I 89'19'12" E 130.13 I / I /I� 402.31 �I I I South line as described—.. e• / J 2� o - 3 .ate l I n Doc. No. 400503 � ,00/ N N 1" �w N 89'36 0 / ' I SE co b d 1 rn r/s h„ 5' I 7 � E � -� 93,r 4 I 2scr O n DyE: No. 400003 /ate I z \ o / 928 o i s ti N ` CE cr No. 3798464e 9 E Cibed P R C �' A llllll Doe. ile. 1 v' o` c N < h I / f Doc. N�. 319846m„X L- .87 R= 21 (� ❑ ) 1 rV %" g se W^ a o x '`$ Dom_ ( J i 7e'zS E�S� o I \ / /2,go a \ _� I":`J sEc ease -off /1 ' If N n Docn Non 319 J ( 93°/ I —9342 /928 � (J,�,asejg ti U HE c —930 os described r 'if in Dac. N o. 274865 ry Q / —932 P L A � / X ° East Ilne as cribed des in Doc. No. 274865.— _� n l X932 \ 56-3 1 932/ \ ♦ I\ c W M AMM th line as described _ - f T - W g�r in Doc. No, 220825 00 Q \ \ \ \934 ^L S 89'32'46" W� _ 19.37 _ / ti ° N 00'23'59"W� _ / �s sB-s s) 71.82 se -s 93a • - L F 3�3'43'3'3"bY<-� � � �,� a 211.71 /1 / / m 1.�. L=597.96C' v \ —934— / X934 f rth line of he SoG,th 1� /- 25 ms /a i9'' Mature Fine Trees Ing=— i z9 6 5 Per�O c�Ples_ 3]6 @ J4825B4 1 \ r °j I 9]0 C rater of S 00*12'5pp47"�fit ° m Pe•4"e /�° thl area 20' Easement Pa o�N.. 836406 Section 17 �'9 stat!. I e5 •_95 / ��ti N n 589'243 r- , s -s S89'3 '4fi"W i 2 "�' �`: 505.07 r E e�'� 329.99 .o T 5 Y South lin t Northe°s Quer r f 17. ai is O1 East Quarter corner of Section on O o Z Q2Q 17, Township 31 nR Doge 21 _ I IIIII P P�p� I IA. i LAST PLOTTED: 7/21/2017 11:07 AM OPERATOR: SMS X(�FIRE HYDRANT 502 CONTOUR EXI CONTROL PANEL e4u ■ BASIS OFBEARINGS — z R O For the purposes of this survey the South line of p the Northeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, BY: RPA BY: M Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota, is assumed .7 o, m oruedermy directsupervision !J� to bear N 89'32'46' W N � the Iaws of Ne state ofMiwesofa. 00 ■ BENCHMARK PROJECT NUMBER 16-1067 BM 7a'S6 / NOS nameNAVD 8IN NGS 1 O M e'ft Lot h Located 61'P Aimately a sir feat South of 159th street west of Highway 61. Across the street from the existing substation and feet East of Bike Trail. n r `�yv' `/ y l % J ~ qqq w Be—Ele935.12 feet—,^^i^/J/ 200 0 200 400 _ I --I CL of La HORIZONTAL: 1"=200' hiM I4 PROPERTY DESCRIPTION `✓ w �" ' Parcel A: 0 All that part of the Northeast Quarter, lying East of Minnesota Highway No. 61 of Section No. 17, Township 31 North, / Range 21 West, in the City of Hugo, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, described as follows: y,y Commencing at the center of Section No. 17; thence East along the East and West Quarter line for 157.4 feet to the beginning the description; thence East East West Quarter line for 2152.6 feet d �r point of of continuing along said and more r less, to Its intersection with the West line of the East half of the East half of the East half of the Northeast Quarter t (NE 1/4) of said Section No. 17, as described in Book 74 of Deeds, page 174, Document Number 50181; thence North J,] ,py along said West line of the East Half of the East Half of the East Half for 1971 feet, more or less, to the Southeast comer as described in Document Number 338569; thence West along the South line as described in said Document Number 338569 for 1350.10 feet to the Northeast corner as described in Document Number 400503 for 464.92 feet to the Southwest corner thereof. This point also being on the Easterly right of way line of Minnesota Highway No. 61; thence .^v/ Southerly along said Easterly right of way line of Minnesota Highway No. 61 for 61.4 feet to the Northwest comer as described in Document Number 319846; thence East the North line described in Document Number 319846 along as said for 464.92 feet to the Northeast comer thereof; thence southerly along the Easterly line as described in said Document fG Number 319846 for 300.00 feet to the Southeast corner thereof. This point beingalso the Northeast corner as described in Document Number 340482;thence Southerly along the Easterly line asdescribein said Document Number 340482 for 600.00 feet to the Southeast co 9 corner thereof. This point being also the Northeast corner as described in Document Number aa 274865; thence South along the East line of said DocumentNumber 274865 for 393.62 feet to the most Easterly comer 's of the Southeast corner as described ' said Document Number 274865. This point being also in the North line of Document Number 220825 and Book 246 Deeds, page 567; thence East along said North line as described in Document W a Number 220825, and Book 246 Deeds, page 567, for 25.99 feet, more or less, to the Northwesterly line of St. Croix Falls, fa. Minnesota Improvement Co., now known as Northern State Power Co., as described in Document Number 33210, and Book 60 Deeds, page 553, for 700.4 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. SEAL Excepting the St. Croix Falls, Minnesota Improvement Co., now known as Xcel Energy, Inc., and also excepting property contained in Document Number 869311. (Abstract Property) Parcel B: Govemment Lot Six (6) in Section Sixteen (16), in Township Thirty -One (31) North, of Range Twenty-one (21) West, excepting therefrom the South One (1) rod thereof, and excepting therefrom that cert.in easement described in Deed recorded in Book 142 of Deeds, Page 205, and excepting also that certain strip of land described in Warranty Deed recorded in Book 63 of Deeds, Page 626, and also excepting and reserving to the part of the first part an easement over Signature: and across said premises, running in an Ely and Wly direction to Lake Oneka, for the purpose of maintaining, repairing and replacing a certain tile drainage system now existing and running over and across said property. Expiration Date: 00/00/203<1 Parcel C: The East Half of the East Half of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter (E% of EW of E% of NEU) of Section Number Seventeen (17), in Township Number Thirty-one (31) North of Range Number Twenty one (21) West, containing Twenty (20) acres, ore or less, according to the United States survey thereof except: REV. DATE DESCRIP A stripof land 50 feet in width the center of sold stripbeinglocated and staked out as follows Nz: Com mencin at stake in the East fine of Section 17, 350.5 feet Soutof te Northeast comer thereof; running thence South 43 degrees 31 minutes West, 3011.9 feet; thence on a 10 degree curve to the right from said course a a tangent, 459.5 feet; thence South 89 degrees 28 minutes West parallel with the East and West quarter line throughasaid Section, Q 157.4 feet to a stake which is 25 feet South of the center of said Section, reserving the right of 3 crossings over said 50 foot strip Also excepting the South rod thereof and an easement over and across said premises running in an EasteHy and Westerly direction to Lake Oneka for the purpose of maintaining, repairing and replacing a certain tile drainage system now existing and running over and across sold property, said easement befog limited to a strip of land 25 feet in width on each side of said drain tile line as presently Installed, subject to easements of record, if any. Parcel D: Thatart of the Northeast Quarter of Section 17 Township31 Range 21 Washington Count Minnesota described as above described parcel commencing at the intersection of he Easterly y right of way line of the Minnesota State Trunk FJ, Highway No. 61 and the East-West line of said section 17• thence North 11 degrees 51 minutes 01 seconds East on an 9to assumed bearing, along said Easterlyrightof way line a distance of 1633.76 feet the point of beginning of the parcel zC to be described; thence continuing North 11 degrees 51 minutes 01 seconds East a distance of 32.24 feet; thence North 89 degrees 36 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 201.30 feet; thence westerly 67.84 feet along a non-tangential curve, concave to the south having a radius of 278.50 feet a central angle of 13 degrees 57 minutes 26 seconds and the O chord of said curve bears North 82 degrees 37 minutes 19 seconds East; thence South 75 degrees 38 minutes 36 seconds West, tangent to the last described curve, 57.57 feet; thence westerly 85.87 feet long tangential curve, concave to the North, having a radius of 321.50 feet and a central angle of 15 degrees 18 minutes 14 seconds to the Q rti point of beginning. W SURVEYOR NOTES 1) Field work was completed on December 9th, 2016. A O 2) The soil boring jf's 2,3,4 and 6 also had piezometers. Braun Intertec did the geotechnical PIS-, I --t work site. i/� h Wetlands delineated on Parcel D and E w done by Peterson Environmental in 2004. The re delineated by Kjolhaug Environmental rest of the to 2015. W 6L4vironmental site was E -I r LEGEND rel F U U rl H POLE BITUMINOUS SURFACE rl UGH POLE W SIGN kf POWER POLE O CONCRETE SURFACE ® or ® CATCH BASIN a DECIDUOUS TREE r� GRAVEL SURFACE CONIFEROUS TREE F, o TELEPHONE BOX uT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE H E» N WATER VALVE o SANITARY SEWER F is FOUND IRON MONUMENT p° STORM SEWER E" ti • SET IRON MONUNEMT OHE OVERHEAD ELECTRIC W o 71 ELECTRIC BOX IGI— GAS LINE O MANHOLE wL WETLANDS EDGE X(�FIRE HYDRANT 502 CONTOUR EXI CONTROL PANEL TREELINE DRAWN SA w WATERLINE Td CABLE TV BOX BY: RPA BY: 0 SOIL BORING Itherebycertify thatthis q,plmorreportcuespreparedbyme oruedermy directsupervision sod that I em a duly Licensed Lend Sa yoruader the Iaws of Ne state ofMiwesofa. DATE 3-2-17 LIC. NO. 53529 seona.Uww DESIGNED DLI. SHEET BY: DRAWN SA BY: BY: RPA BY: DATE OF PRELIMINARY 4/24/2017 DATE OF FINAL: 00/00/20XX SHEET NO. 2 OF 61 SHEETS PROJECT NUMBER 16-1067 Michael Riopel Busy B Enterprises LLC 6421 165th St N, / r 1200 Foss Road, New Brighton, MN I I Hugo, MN m r y turn oroultd�� 09 /' -- ' - -- - - - - - - --- --- --- 27 26 25( :. 24 / / p ' / aJ`\iy e 0 l utlot I 23 1B� _ \ W M PROPERTY DESCRIPTION 15/ /r ,I R All that part of the Northeast Quarter, lying East of Minnesota Highway No. 61 of Section No. 17, Township 31 North, 14 r / �i Range 21 West, in the City of Hugo, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, described as follows: I I I I �22 / All f Outlet D Commencingat the center of Section No. 17; thence East alongthe East and West Quarter line for 157.4 feat to the I o 1 t3/ �([p{p�/�°().^Easert paint of beinning of the description; thence continuing East alng said East and Wast Quarter line for 2152.6 feet more Z I I I 11 21 12 I /" / r, less, to its intersection with the West line of the East half of the East half of the East half of the Northeast Quarter / / (NE 1/4) of said Section No. 17, oe described in Book 74 of Deeds, page 174, Document Number 50181; thence North 29 / / 20 11 along said West line of the East Half of the East Half of the East Half for 1971 feet, more or less, to the Southeast comer as described in Document Number 338569; thence West along the South line as described in said Document Number 115 19 � r /r 338569 for 1350.10 feet to the Northeast corner as described in Document Number 400503 for 464.92 feet to the / 14 � SOA Southwest corner thereof. This point also being on the Easterly right of way line of Minnesota Highway No. 61; thence II / �F / Southerly along said Easterly right of way line of Minnesota Highway No. 61 for 61.4 feet to the Northwest comer as k 67ydescribed in Document Number 319846; thence East along the North line as described in said Document Number 319846 for 464.92 feet to the Northeast comer thereof; thence southerly along the Easterly line as described in said Document City of Hut ' I � 13 � � ` r � Number 319846 for 300.00 feet to the Southeast corner thereof. This point being also the Northeast corner as described I7 r in Document Number 340482;thence Southerly along the Easterly line as described in said Document Number 340482 for / 7 � I 600.00 feet to the Southeast corner thereof. This point being also the Northeast corner as described in Document Number I ' Bus B Enterprises LLC JI / ' /� r / 274865; thence South along the East line of said Document Number 274865 for 393.62 feet to the most Easterly comer 1200 Foss Road, New Brighton, MN (� ore /' 1\) of the Southeast corner as described in said Document Number 274865. This point being also in the North line of - O o°aoe 12 11 ` I Document Number 220825 and Book 246 Deeds, page 567; thence East along said North line as described in Document Q �o 10 9 - Number 220825, and Book 246 Deeds, page 567, for 25.99 feet, more or less, to the Northwesterly line of St. Croix Falls, ' Outlot eb c°:`� c Minnesota Improvement Co., now known as Northern State Power Co., as described in Document Number 33210, and Book ' I Thomas antl Sandra Dresher I "C" °AOy� 1 Ue° I / 60 Deeds, page 553, for 700.4 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. 'q 13093 Quail Creek Drive NE oSc 44 11 of Ou o d U1111ty \ 4 5 / a '0� Yr O Excepting the St. Croix Fails, Minnesota Improvement Co., now known as Xcel Energy, Inc., and also excepting property 'I Minneapolis, MN < S.�'p/ 45 43 I a dr eine I 1 2 3 6 7 Tro & Gina � x _--_ ,. %� k 3 42 r Eoseme^ \ q2 .In / contained in Document Number 869311. Dunce sn on 'nN O OButlot ql 2 \ i (Abstract Property) 5850 159th St AND: 16 Government Lot Six (6) in Section Sixteen (16), in Township Thirty -One (31) North, of Range Twenty-one (21) West, 17 2 11 5 3� 21 20 19 16 excepting therefrom the South One (1) rod thereof, and excepting therefrom that certain easement described in Deed �' 22 IS , recorded in Book 142 of Deeds, Page 205, and excepting also that certain strip of land described in Warranty Deed /fes 4 6 1717 /4I recorded in Book 63 of Deeds, Page 626, and also excepting and reserving to the part of the first port on easement over Cindy Reese s (\aJc c \ I / r\ / y and across said premises, running in an E'ly and Wly direction to Lake Orl for the purpose of maintaining, repairing and )15895 Fo hill 7 , 1 /' t� o m e \36 7 2 16 14 9 replacing a as the drainage system now existing and running over and across said property. i \/ L J Indu t76 Mies Q �o \35 Y 12 13 / 13 r / AND: Robin Barbs _1 PO Box 76, Hugo, MN 20 J � of to 34 6 15 /(� I/ The East Half of the East Half of the East Half of the Northeast Quarter (E}� of E% f E% of NEk) of Section Number 21 / ,�`-_ �Q �33 J 5 1 Seventeen (17), s Township Number Thirtyeone (31) North of Range Number Twenty one (21) West, containing Twenty (20) Donald Bai rl O `\ ,�� / / and }�' c 32 3 14 11 ��ll \ /I acres, more ar less, according to the United States survey thereof except: r a `1 a �F 5 75 Forest B vd N F I -- v asement a/ 31 Y / _ _ _ r A strip of land 50 feet in Sec the center of said strip being located and staked out as follows, viz: Commencing at �!I' t9o._hfN - 2 u1�itY e o _ -10 10 - � I�� a stake in the East Zine of Section 17 350.5 feet South of the Northeast comer thereof running thence South 43 __ ----- --- 45 -� - 3 /\ me course / / 9 degrees r minutes Weat, 3011.9 feet; thence t a 10 degree curve to the right from said co o tangent, 459.5 T 2 24 25 29 2 9 t (� / feet; thence South stake degrees 28 minutes West parallel with the East and West quarter line through 3 said Section, ' Out l `fib \ 3\ I ' 26 I �r B \ �8 I 157.4 feet t a stake which is 25 feet South of the center of said Section, reserving the right of 3 crossings over I B. O e° � 22 27 28 `v/ 9 1 I P ^ said 50 foot strip. I� I Llghtining Leasing °o,e �_ f 7 easement er ass 15717 Forest Blvd N, 21 7 ? /�/'i/�j/� ` Also excepting the South rod thereof and an enc ov and acr said premises running m an Easterly and /1 ° j 1 6 / ■ Westerly direction to Lake Oneka for the purpose of maintaining, repairin and 1 ' Hugo, MN 7 5 6 �J I li, existin and running over and a oas said t said easement repairing limited ito a strip of tiledrainage 25 fet sin rwidth 6 4 I 3 5 / n each side of saiddrainfile line as presently Installed, subject to easements of record, if any. 19\ 7 / 1B l Ou lot �� I 13 3 1 And. ow I p / That part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota described as ' 17 'A 16 15 I 1-1 4 4 5 a G + 7 µ above described parcel commencing t the intersection of the Easterly right of way line of the Minnesota State Trunk 14 /\� 1 ..2i� Highway No. 61 and the East-West X line of said section 17; thence North 11 degrees 51 minutes 01 seconds East, on an �i assumed bearing, along said Easterly right of way line a distance of 1633.76 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel _ ( \ 4 11 r 2 ° r to be described; thence continuing North 11 degrees 51 minutes 01 seconds East a distance of 32.24 feet; thence North II 15 ;� 3 S` 1 \ e Q 89 degrees 36 minutes 02 seconds East a distance of 201.30 feet; thence westerly 67.84 feet along a non-tangential T curve, concave to the south having a radius of 278.50 feet a central angle of 13 degrees 57 minutes 26 seconds and the 1 f / / Jill 9a�^d / 10 .l \ �G ` a I 3 n I� W chord of said curve bears North 82 degrees 37 minutes 19 seconds East; thence South 75 degrees 38 minutes 36 Rock Ridge, LLC 14 y e em nt 1 \ 8 `V//�• N I seconds West, tangent to the lost described curve, 57.57 feet; thence westerly 85.87 feet along a tangential curve, 4686 Hiah wayj>_1 N dCOj_ I t /� � � I 9 r, 1 1 \f , ' I I: concave b the North, having a radius of 321.50 feet and a centro) angle of 15 degrees 18 minutes 14 seconds rto the i' White Bear take, AN l3 7 8 f point Of beginning. _ °o9go I I JT Buildings a I 12 aftyM�Y \ 1 Outlet t a627 Fot Blvd. I, i ' Hugores�MN- w; + I \ it �I t0 I 7 6 3\ � 24 1 r l ' Lauren McCullough 2 10- 9 1 25I 26 t\f 7 Well Drllli 1 �// I 3 II PO Be, a18 9 \{tel B ley 23 L 4 /I-3 I e IHugo. MN 13 �22� 27 _ 8 V/ -7 1 4 I \ r�� E Notes I Micro Properties, LLC 1 2 w 2022 144th Lane NE 6 �/ 6 3 21 28 ,` 1sl 1) Townhome area to be a Common Interest Community (C.I.C.). Privately \ _ Andover, MN J G 15 20 'J pt1 of utlot Dd w owned association made up of homeowners. All of Lots 1-45, Block 1. r New Skel 5 ✓ a e n I� 5 t nd t Utilit asement 2) Part of the property along the ditch is in Floodplain AE where the 15575 Forest Blvtl 4 4 o9a ° 1n°^ G I j 7 determined Flood plain elevation Is 930.0 feat. Hugo, MN 3 V ' 16 / 30 \pea -p_ � t, `\ '� 19/ I ywty E I' 3) The Ordinary High Water Level for Lake Oneka is 931.2 ft. 2 IdiO re Oil; Tr e S I � � 3 • E � ° y 9 1 1 4 M Ener '�\ '�-'� `EE o 414 Nlc°Ilel gMall / - osen� � o area 18 `' 3T �� 4) Building setbacks are per detail unless otherwise shown. oMinneapolis, MN / 1 31 / V 3 32 �'•, 5) Street names to be determined by city. often o y/ 1_1 Peter Lovelan Jill Meath arter Benjamn Laurie Fr \\ City of Hugo _ `oT / Glor Borowskid Coo 062 Goodvie 6066 Goodvie 3 128 Goodv eq'15490 Goo \ 548 Goodview T t)o�, Go4w ,P. Trl Bay I Tri BE /6 \ 1 Trl Cir. Ave a XCEL Ene�rgy-�\0;y S� „l o e / William -II " 41n NitoY%t Mall I\/, .aa N�S6 \ ` Slowikor ekl Mi alis, MN s y Christon O 0 f/ 0 0o V _w O�a ey ,5470 Goodv' nape 9So�wi �68 Goodvie 5 as / 3 1 t ,d � Ko I b / i, g m kwia y o I / \oa Nom 0 3 �°,�i r co 6106 fkowski `-gndrew Brumm r� d / Goodview 6722 Goodview j III �h. L}EJ .. am o ~ Trl qr. TO Clr. a, / / + Owner / Developer Engineer & Surveyor PUD Standards (Lake Front) The Lincoln Group Kaskaskia Engineering Group ■ Lot Summary _ Min. Lot Width 55' 7475 Flying Cloud Drive 2550 University Avenue West Single Family 133 Lots =TYPICAL LOT- Suit. 202 Suite 161 S Villa. 74 Lot. Min. Comer Lot Width 65' T easements unless otherwise noted. Eden Prairie, MN 55334 St. Paul, MN 55114 Townhomes 44 Lots Min. Lot Depth 200' Typical a (651)337-5652 Total: 251 Lots Front Setback 25' s, REAR LOT Density is 1.9 lots per acre Side yard Setback 7.5' Municipality. City of Hugo oI - -� Proposed Utilities: Net Density 3.0 lots per acre BUD Standards (Non Lake Front) 0 T (using total buildable area) � c Sewer: City Utilities (available) Min. Lot Width 65' Water: City Utilities (available) Min. Comer Lot Width 75' - Min. Lot Depth 130' E Area Summary Front Setback 25' -�g ��- -� o T Total Buildable Area 3,617,658 sq. ft. or 83.05 acres Side yard Setback 7.5' x Total Parcel Area: 5,722,478 sq. It. or 131.37 acres I hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me a f -1'�5� a 5- Existing Wetland Area: 1,105,861 sq. ft. or 25.39 acres (19%) ■ Wetland Impact or re or under my direct supervision and that am a duly Licensed Land Right-of-way Area: 985,678 aq. ft. or 22.63 acres (17R) Total Wetland: 1,105,861 sq. ft. 25.39 ac Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. 1 - Common Open Space: 176,177 sq. ft. or 4.04 acres (3%) Mitigated Wetland Area: 75,359 sq. ft. or 1.73 °cress setbacks--�J Public Open Space: 1,703,549 sq. ft. or 39.11 acres (30%) Impacted Wetland Area: 27,878 sq. ft. or 0.64 acres �Zonin > --11 Townhomes: 94,894 sq. ft. or 2.18 acres (20%) 9 Summary n 200 0 200 400 line N c�i Villa Lots: 1,044,087 sq. ft. or 23.97 acres (i8R) Current Zoning: (FUS) Future Urban Service L Impervious Area Calcis Pro posed Zoning: PUD Planned Unit Development)nnTr 3-2-17 LiC No, 53528 ---+- Single Family: 1,718,093 sq. ft. or 37.53 acres (30R) P 9 ( Total Impervious surface = 1,376,470 sq. ft. (31.6) 24X Current use: Wooded and agricultural Scott C. Alwin i HORIZONTAL: 1"=200' STREET Total pervious surface = 4,346,008 sq. ft. (99.8 Acres) 76% Proposed use: Residential 1 LAST PLOTTED: 7/21/2017 10:39 AM OPERATOR: SMS Signature: Expiration Date: 00/00/20XX REV. DATE DESCRIP DESIGNED DLF SHEET BY: F pa..l W xxo ATE OF PRELDUNIARY O O I� W H rh 00/00/20XX U v W Q PROJECT NUMBER 16-1067 E E CJ F W rail W O a DESIGNED DLF SHEET BY: DRAWN SA BY: CHECKED RPA BY: ATE OF PRELDUNIARY 4/24/2017 DATE OF FINAL: 00/00/20XX SHEET NO. 3 OF61 SHEETS PROJECT NUMBER 16-1067 100 0 100 200 HORIZONTAL: 1"=100' COCD ) 4 Michael Ri,p,l )7 I 6421 19651 MNt\1 93y I I �N 88°46 09 E`:.% Ha 1 ' I ,/ / `\ / �•;: 29.93 S 89� E� '1011.Ob�. /; _ _ -- ---i um nous s e 0' as T7D� �o - as - 7s - - - o pOa�� II o-°kcare setna k /rr m I 80• 27 25 26 i2a �/ ard\to9�o6ed`g3\ l� �"/�{f����h,!`'�g`teland overl°�Id' tri '� 11.556 ai^I 38 of I I `700 o\� Ut L __ J i\\\ I 4 Utot9,078 of 13,405 of� /. o / a� /) I� z3 /1.o4aiti{a( 24.0?°,,) / O g �70 _ 70 2 3S 32,230 of /i s 11.000 afry -,7Lx (P RK DED �q�Orp/) // - o_ 60' / m m �.o ' 3\4/ / m `L S `k S 14 90 A_ 104/ /22 5 S /11.479 at /ryD0 �!\ I// • / /)9y'L w /'\II / / I/ I A r `D� 23.656 s( E / 13.723 of JLLJ0 12 $ I / �, ti/ 131214 at / 13.723 If yi\ at ioutjid D E 28 / / / /mss` / / I / 20 ' C� i pD% i , Eas'amen+ n 938 I BEE -f / 13.7 N / y 23/ 29 I yy e tai / 19 i 209 / �a / ; I U mI 1�lr L4 15 / \ �, 10/961 37,666 of 9 13,72 54 4\184Y / / ✓ 117.24 of I /i 65 / 3/af �// I �/ /:•, o I s �� I5 5 -2 / 1 I / v�o / 200 -1I i • / . 117 6 8.844 of 449af I 1� o rn / I: •• > / / / 1 9,749 e(�� ,f \ \3.2013 ' /r 30660 If 1� er i �, ss I 11,090 e \ and 75 \ I /I 0 •. /J/ 1 '>c, \ 1' ° /f 11,000 Busy B Ent p L� / / / 200 Fo s R. N�,I / // NI 8 9'19'12 » 12 E 1350.13 ,; ;' / �°�F� 12 za�� 11 0 / h A I 10 44,825 of h \ / I I / 10,074 of ^/ 9.159 of r5C8.388 If / •- `_ 7/ 60/ `1,77/5 0014 4,/5191 at 15000 t � DUtloi h\, µ, aJ0 U --U. 3/ 252sS I /; 65 ss , b %\ z, 1730 0 0 44 <�p'1 43 ' I / / All 19.45 /^ 7 / / h / 3 8,653 of/ 6 / 3 45 9 950 of / / // droino9R and U{ ty / y 42 1 2 8,441d f I I / 18,818 of 11,047 of /-- 76,17711,OD0 V / �(\ / `� / ;•I 1of 3 u W 42 b I // / / /pp/ / Eosarr nt // / \ I ; ' i S 17.917 of 18.734 of I l a / o � /fl \ N/•\ � / o' I 2 269 °i °'2"2%Saf - a / / //lam / 0 U ti /y/q` ' I - $• 1 47 17 , b0 - 3 I S° S 63 9 I p / / \ '1 / \ > 41 110 s,. a+ 126 36 ° 40l l 2 X40+111.\ -20- 9 0 85 57313 If a s 7 R00 39 9za // y 39\ 6' 7b 9 62 \ /25 / �m / / / \ l y ao , I I o \ 9.162 of / \ 3 / 1Oi.�y r+.a 11��'1g09 / 3 z>st ^m• / / \ / / \�°,. y� 120\�I 19 L 934 - 1 9,/71221 of 8,266 at ` 10.409 of rop / 11.000 of I �: -ez 930 - 0 '� c3`- 11.346 of I \ fo \ ,n �•: I y \ �s 37 7S\ yy 6 I h 15 P'2p0\ n 1\ 45 17 11,000 of .moo / / 11 �' 13.437 of J =6 X113 \ 1p450 of \� 3 /� \ / 7 ,.3 /i/ \� d /� /Q�/ y eFld\ yh o� yam` 7 AO 164 1/� 16 \ 14 20p \ 5p� l 9.467 If \o o y \00 of 12 12 ��17�366 '14.369 of 13 2p!`34 6 7iS°a Ssf ry m \ 111.000 of �de28 /b, \/ a \ bO . ^o ` 10.907 of - @ Lr a 15 \ - 17 - �_ - Wr \ 339\ s \ 11 `6 0 \2 " 0� \ y6 y 13655 sf �\ I n ' 30 r I 11.000 of a / \� y ,6.218 a( and l 32 \ s,a,. \\ 8�, ti c 14 f y I \ / l 9 '60 9,100 of I 11 /\ / J / /••I / 4 e \ \yy� 13 /- 111.000 ar " r .yy 2226 / / / ~ / fJ'. ° e 7� \ 4 1 n 13 I 3S h i24 / / /i 104 19,r OA lot 1 LAST PLOTTED: 7/21/2017 10:39 AM OPERATOR: SMS - - uiA y _ J � _ 178 24 25 26 ^�ry o �' 19.629 of I w O+� Irv° yy \ 310 \' °f Y 10;512 of j ry �, \ 30 9,665 of U�/ ,1 21,853 of1/ \ � 29 \� °j \ �j ro0 3p� / Q/ 9T - •.% n 13� 1 �� / 13.284 If /a / 91791 of my tl/ //. n / 130 y� ,I 28 0� 60 ^9.150 of Jp ly �G S's .465 of 9 / a 37 o a I I &116 of I o0�°e�' ,? 0 7\/2�/6/ 93 6 if. I- 222 /� 6 65 / 1 I 130 1zo00af [/ /� [_// / 1: �4=` 26 I ^ / 1 J \ �h 7 1 • 18.450 of / 5 „o I // /' ^ 6S /8.450 of / ¢ 3 I �I�'�/ 11.42U of 8,828 of / 7 11, 00 ef'� I oncrefe ,a 1 7�t,722 sf \ sitlewalk o' 1� 2 0 Ib,T ,�6 ! 4,5 / 6S / 10.7001 of I� \ I M \ \ 1 �I � 1 70 / // 10.345 of"y- I \ 5 a) I ,r 31 93 x 9.100 / 1 '� 12.551 3 `'0 A/ I I I is I 7S 2 16 / 16.905 If I 133527 of \, �\ 9,100 fif / / �^ � oncrefe !d I aI\ /. / 4 i a ewal .'a / \ 15.285 of FF'�'+� 3a �N 9 z '7�rmnN U o h � � CyUy7 h Signature: Epinton Date: 00/00/20XX REV. DATE DESCRIP DESIGNED DLF SHEET BY: DRAWN SA BY: E CHECKED RPA BY: ATE OF PRELIMINARY E 4/24/2017 E w 00/00/20XX ti rail PROSECT NUMBER 16-1067 a DESIGNED DLF SHEET BY: DRAWN SA BY: CHECKED RPA BY: ATE OF PRELIMINARY 4/24/2017 DATE OF FINAL: 00/00/20XX SHEET NO. 4 OF 6l SHEETS PROSECT NUMBER 16-1067 30.560 of d,: and >5 N IBey B Enterprle e L III I 0' ° �/, m 1200 Fnae Road. New right\, MN \ / II 11 / I Is ---------- - 2 �/� / / I 44.825 of //.1-0`74 of I / 5e,38e of /4.5l; O Outlot�� 'o• _ - // of �.Tzs s 25 I Thomas and Sandra Dreshar ( �.'" ...........us sl e y 3 252= T74� 1 a ' 65 I // h°' 0 \' 7 1� 6 O "' N 00 / 13093 Quail Creek Drive NE C a I Sg 2,275af 4 \ ,iJ I I Minneapolis. MN I °g°F�/ 930 . I i` _2,275 2,27 sf wal L / %j / I O / / I '1 I� I I� I'r 65 N n"i a �o 1 1 so of vc / I dutlot B � / \ All of and Utl tY e't a I I 1119.474 'I 1 / l -_- -- -_ -- J / 1]6,1] sr _-/ /� // drdin0 2- 3 8,853 ai �/ 6 / II 3 u 42 Eose l t // / \ I \ I 4+11.97] sf 1118,734 at I / 17.047 of / 42 844 f 6�q/ 8,818 of d O' I / 2269 ar`� z-zTsar - a / ` / ^9 / at s ' 6 47 17 �_ \ / I 63 I C / // OU U0 \ ,v 1 36 _ 4 U t I°� a \ 9 6s Q /. ?°°j / .✓ A / /� 2s 3 °�\5 / z f� "1 z> of i / /ti /� �� \ / v ° / �n I- 4 O / / / 573.13 at 09� 0 (13J- 928 «. a) _ o / •1-q 9 sz a y 39� 6 % y s IJto h t 934 /21 I 1 712 of 1 P•266 of 10,409 of 12 yd/// / �� ° •\ a -22 a �� "yov eo• H� 30.3 � �l 930 \45 / 17 y / / ' y \7°x , 0 13.437 of\� ` 460 of \ y \ �J •1;y Vi y 16 3 y 3 3s 6 // / /e. / / S? a / 96 7 b 17 3y �N3 y °F7\ /7 AA 1 / i/ /off/ y 6= y //s3 oA 9.46 of/�/ 16 1.000 ai l i I i 1 I rO'//v,19 �' L Nay 0`�3 y �/ / / / yr° \ •'°o V y°�at°`c y\\ \ame °cJ \ 12 12 I 13 6.4so of nduatrlal ut+rtia u N 9� / / ®, o. e 9 �„F PO Box 76. Hugo, MN I x' \ 3 °'S x / / //3/4��\ 16 6 N\1 14,369 f 17,366 of V \\ 41\1,000 of i r I l I 2085 •N''S28 /�� / .0/\y \�Y o 0.907 of I /- c°� d ?4 a I /Is Z275tf n `I s s$\\ \ yy 13,sss 15.216 If p• y 32 \ ,� 1\ 80 / a ' to h \ o o d aierl J \ _ 3y ,/ / / / easement- . / / �° .°�c� y \> '° �y�' \ 13 1 L _ _ \ of I ll000 ar w 15775 Forest Blvd N, y 3S 5 N5 ? 25 / _- /�'c S 1 4 o 1 i Hugo. MN ,° 3 S ,j / / / dna ent'/ / 1C's%'ty° y \7 J / 22'ow /10;512 f _ I l N ry 23 m�° o F ry � -� °F d�q 1n 37 _- --- --- 1 45 - _ J .S // S 9.665 of a�/ 21.653 of �� ll�- - - � i7s� �� \ h 1 v � � / 25 ' 29 \ \ cps \ /, 2/ '� /� 1 /71.000 of 0/ SEAL ,� y s y i z w ° �� IYI � \ II`� j / Y 24 / 6' `/ 13,284 of N' / 9791 If l 11 l �� I rye same°n0 /// 1 34 oI ' 19.629 of �O ry I 28 \ / 60• 9 , 30 �^ 6s\j15 sf I \ n/\ / \ 9 I to r\ 7\� Out >> / / / < V n \ X, _ �7I 4 v/ v also of Vw ' v 2 1 / 1 Ligntmmg Leaalos 1 I Q a ,S` / / / / o, •e,� I ^ Sa so ,a.ns at eJs ^ � \ ?� °s�o, >z \ � 7 \ � es � \/ �9i7 of � 15717 Forest Blvd N, oe / / / ^ �( ,._ \ _ I ^7 i , / 6 2 � \/ 7 \ Hugo. MN I ��.83 c°A o / / / /\ 972(/ \` , 59 81 IL / �70\SBy 6a o¢ 93�j 11.222 e�/ 6 I �30J 12.000 of / 149 `Y/ d •. 1 8 / t �n \ 20 Signature: 7 8.450 of 1 h \ 0 \/ �/ 11'.421/ er / �S \ / /!- 3 / p 6 L /aa50 ar C \ xpo-atron Date: Dmamzaxx oncrefe aj / `T 1k,722 of \000 ot\ / 9 / / 7 y / / tlewalk o ♦y° 2 O 6,n 30 yyy�� �� lo,3a �•/>8 11 /st of REV. DATE DESCRIP 93 9,100 I / dio I /' r d0 +F 11,618 of / is 11� IIr13 > \ tss f3 zs a^� / I / / / // /�✓ / >, �°� „ ^ , ry 16 16,905 of / 13,527 f // \/S \y(- 4sitlaWall �( '1 ' \ 15,285 of a1\ 43.35F1i 40.745 of µ / �I,F a O d'`sO ,lv 70.792 et/ 93 / \k / j%/ \ 7 1 14 I / \ 47 // / j/ 9 2\B.528\r I 14.784 of/� O 6o- RS, t\50 0 �06 �I\ I \ \�/ N \�b.285 of �(/ i r , D �4V IE 4 �D/J/ � 7"//>t\N O 2 _`5f`EL2f6`�'CD14.262 f / at \ 15.285 W3\1\87 S \ 15,285 si\ 1 1 I I 1119 I 90' 11.332 of v r�T' �\ _ /a,0 �\14.70r1 of I \ 9 1 ! r 30 701 t 10 h^ / x 14' Idr 78 93 12.913 of < / \\SO f' a anal_ 102 ° lly e°3ynent Rock Ridge, uc V I 10, A _� N I 1 \ s 8 tom. la,aoo ar ( I x 4886 Highway 61 N $205 - 1 �o A I I I I �0 ` 1 - \ N +ry9, 14.235 of \� 2 1/ White Bear Loke, MN 1�g�1t_ p/�� 9s0 ./ \ 11 I I I i \ w�, i dos ar >4� / f -F' IIII m _ �Z� _ 16 I / �\ i I 10 p C~iL" 0 y JT Bull tlings T 15627 Forest Blvd. o Hugo, MN I i 100 0 100 200 HORIZONTAL: 1"=100' _ j LAST PLOTTED: 7/21/2017 10:39 AM OPERATOR: SMS z / - - 2 - utulvt,v It wt wrerso I 76 \ UO 55 U�y �I 12 a ate aidewmt „L) [~ I \ 11 IIII I V 14.573 afl' � 10� dr°en°9e and \ �� II IIII \ \ - 1 9�rn rg690 y 1 �6 Ilit °semen 53 74 -,A5 '1 ` 7 ul e "'I 5 �!//�\��I�d'IIII\ d PARK DEDIC I TIC W U N \ 9.084 of 22 - 75 X45 115 1 9.750 of0 110.377 r,'`�I I 13.889 of O // f 1 - ,.� I ;4 '�� / 1 �(2.75D'e�l ' III I y (22.8 i Ji �tt I n 60• _ 24/�DI 1 _a -i"-�/ / / It (22.8 1 Pero) .�c �rdafe m I ,3.4ez�f �2 11 NII n.2os ar / C w t3., 4 f I L �J- 56 46 4 F \ a-/ 5 %� \ 2 \O / I 65 3.906 of h� 12,05 oI-N��/ ^ m I 7.99f Iw 25 II 2/ , � 7\ X 9.780 of 5 90 ��55 934 6��� \ \ \\ ,n 0 /^ = 12 12 I 15 I0 ` Ir� N I I 8 �_ 11= f I \\ -�"�^ice b\\ �� i $0 T `ol 'L 10,8291'V 23 �9 \' / 4 10,500 eft -�� I / 1.11 \ 1p 92'ry�\ �! f "'725 �..i L-73 J 7/ 3z C S / / /<� a F / / / /1 \ / �> s 1 / ro/ m>\ 138.268 s J I / 27 1� `9 \2.551 ar ` \ 3y r L! \ e`Q 13.8 of \ \ % / G �� 1 89 , 22 V� ,9.460 of S) \) 74 / I 4y h I e. E- /91 1 z31 / 12s, 49;111'689 of 8 9.295 of '° �� IA\ 20 �^ SO y 3 \ / 14 / V `�Tti _\� yyc a3 of of 6 \ ^! / m ° °� 9, \' .'r. _f 3 21 \ l 2a \ 0 6�. J \�/��J'tL/ J /� 1 I o 13.869 1 I / / \ X. y 608 a 11,894 of N 0 31 JS �a \ 1 1 507 f I 932 01 of i e� << / / ;i f ; / ��• � � yy ' t 6 � ,(/ 459 9_0 Z. 15 9 S 20 n 1\ 29/. "of at 1 \ �O O / c'a 151 / Al �4 f -y 11,725 of ,5.560 f dr nage 1� ulliit;� r e° 5 3 7yg,\` ,y 0e �(� / 9. ^/ 16 \� _ f I 19 934 \ - \�. + a ` / J 10.314 of v d,. A ry e1 y X* 34 \ / n 30 N o ono9 pea 9g 3 4 30, 3 of / \ 15,647 If/ �^ t14,E54 9f - N - 137 °U\ll9 ° 7 1 i \ M/y\p�('ur Pine ITree�i�this\ a 5 `\}`\-' -� M _ _ \ of , $o' o / Y III I I rOW27 of y \ C / \ `r \\ / / '3// 21.319 of \\° / � X61- i _ i \, li 4\ \ / / 1 DESIGNED DLF SHEET BY: DRAWN SA BY: CHECKED �,A HY: ATE OF PRELIMINARY 4/24/2017 DATE OF FINAL: 00/00/2D. SHEET N0. 5 OF61 SHEETS PROJECT NUMBER 16-1067 2ti / / 15 218 If and ! goo RO' 1 r S� / p• 1n°9a 9 A zF l h 32 p <j 9,100ar dl -in -9- 15775 Forest Blvd N, \' \ u1 3S :y 2 25 V9'- / /y�,o oyn 4 Hugo, MN rO� h ' / / -- \/>\j'' �I 22 35 / yp 3m�P� h° \ 3LB 0512 if - - - - - - ti \ 45 ` ry23 ro,° °S`u'" / / / / / _ Q°O� O _ 0 v J - 0 �S d� _ _ �0. _ _ �a S 3j / 936 ) \ `00 af0/ -- /''• x --__ ``- / 104 - -_ \ �f 'S> J �eF 1 / 9,685 of .�h,L 21,653 of �j' �1 /i j _774 J h/ \ 11 / O\ ! 13,284 of N 9,791 sf X / ~ *ol 25 26 � J 2 � N �// / m \\ OJ n /� a1 O /1 I ,. N 19.829 of .�6.9;638 of v1 \ ���/// my I �` di h0N9 O 6 �99/�1 \ N / 4 13 ,n O y N OUt `� . ' 0 �• I� , \ \ ,/ \ e I/ l/m /�� \ /L I \ h/ 'o`P r N z °PP o° 1 / ro• 3 0 28 O• 9 m ` `L// LLL ��{{ � � � O �7 O 6 \ < 9.150 s( `r0 R �^ S 9.465 sf�I\ 7 \ o- / 0 o` v1 s e 1 2 Lightining Leasing / II rr^r i Q D / /// / �/� // (/\`I/fd �lI / 18.116 a l J9 / \ /, \ �1 m�' �? 7 \ 65 >\l / \,07 sf 15717 Forest Blvd N, [j oN / s) `ts 54 50 ,. '\ I 5],813 Hugo. MN P°j POA ♦ / / 9/ 21 10\S r36 er/ \ ` sg °lf 381 11.222 of / 6 ' 30 J 12.00 /1 oQ� , /s3� V� o 749 `� J 7 B i //% /A 0h \/V c}/ �-�J / 1 �h 7 /8,450 of 5 �T / I 1 rh \T200 �' j8.450 sf 4 14,722 of 1 11. 00 of \ -itleW°Ik O 1ho 2 O @� 6 1 - 4S / 85 `10.7001 of I I ^ \ 1 �^7j \ \ 1 �I ry I 1 1 9 s Jy`4 70 / 1a.34s af�% �/ ?a 6$ ` \ 00 yhj m I tea/ z \�// >BS J \ 0 S. / 31 93 9.100 `' / 5 7 11. 1 �1 2.551 of I I Q /11,618 of - �p j 8 zg 1 \ I I I ►� �I6.eos ar 13fif3 \/ v_ oncre I d OU ✓' / Zm n `1O' 13,527 sf /\ le WPI 1 / 15,285 of Ar 16 n '' �/ �\ �/ C S 4 / / �_.. side �N ) ) �// 0 �l�V s'f� / //m � \s ,,p{ , /� s 9#fov-- 10' 1 \ V/J F h 40.745 of a B O .F+' X10,4 aL/ \ 8 ))) `./ O - - - - /// B�J9J ry ��� ' 14 �l2 �i a O z \ T9.6A5 f/ 18,528 of 1 O S 11,050 std ! / i�\ `\ 15,285 of / i ty/ I I' �j O /PPP / /,� 8 `V _ /• �-.t"- 14.784 ar _+9L �. 3 � l .� w I % l 111 r 7>5 2 d �. �� P i0, 248 - \_a 14 262 at \V�glszes e�� I I e 15 / �� :v s1 T / yf�/v - 3 / \ 15.285 ar / 0.'1' 11.332 sf 1 _ /^ ' 33 70 .�j� �T' \\ _ �O \\14.7012 a( / I \ ,/ a I I 1{ I I r 30 / -I 80 Tao �-107 - 10 k1 x' / ' r \ 1 I / y �'rdr°f 78 93 12,913 s� \ 11111 I 314 M / �9 a ,,� ut i Y ee en702 LLca 1� A I I I 10.rfo6 �ry I 80 \ 1�, 2 8 ( ' L2 108/ OS I I f1111 / \ - I rd N I U I 1 �"b of `1 MNIII1aa3s m J r lP W 15,308 sr - 930/ J c \ \ \) 4I 1 I III I - X ( _yJi \ 11 ( 111 II 1 O 3 0\ 23.70 15 932 B9 26 9 f I I Sg 59 2 V Ona n� W X. 55 2 _ ss 51 e 74 y esmP v OUtiIOt ° 1' 9 / � z ac .. 76 \ 1 I j ES I, 15j \ \ ! I rr � 1 0 n I SEAL emPWolk � � I 1 14.573 - m fO tp' drmnagP and 6 II \V 1P 1111111yy11 V I 70690 8 illt Basemen 53 74 '/ 7 �� 5 / III 1 11 1 T m IO1 I 10 r0 �\ 4 e4- 22- 75X45 I V' 115 9.750 a� 10.p�7'13.889 sf I 1 1 u, `,PARK DEDICATION1, 11111 1 nyo8.09 f It ! / �(G75D-a�\19911\'124 1 1 ! (22.82 af) 62,f/�'I a ap Ir I �\ \'�)11.206 of 6 13.14 / - 5a 46 \J/\ a 9 %� 2 I 65 13,905 at�\�' \ 2 1(zs s I ar =-asp _ Iw I 2 j ] 1 85 _ � \ st ure setback rrom 7 d ars.7s0 ar y vvV// I 934 6q \S 15� \` �! \ kh r fl. : hd overlay distric gna ure: 6,081 a _1 '° 10.829 4\23 ��'1�^�\' y� 4\ 10.50 sf 7. 11 7� 3 \ I I \lSi t f v�T�n -TZYS I LL I / Expiration pate: pmpp/zpxx of 1 N� I�27� ro �138a6a ar X27 2.551 of Lr �u.8as a� '8'9`1y. _ 11.of I n \ \ u x 0 / + I , I / I ' REV. DATE DESCRIP �T M1 7 / 9,295 sf �n\ - '� �� I� ?O /% 60- g 3 4 IO �\ / 1 \� / 1�/ / 1 / ��� A � af�� ai I � !7 S" 00 \ z> / J 3 21 1 ` 26 0 6 6 c\� /11}1/-/.� 13.889 .Sh y e,EpB 8 11.894 of q - 14.501 sf \ ry O �S /J / \ 1 507 of :932 k I 5 \`v _ / � / ^ > \ >J / ,k e o 15 9 2029 a _ o ►\I X11/ I ��y 11.72=af = 11 1 \ Pnd Utlllt`� 1 I I \ 0 1.340 of \15.560 of �4i "' 157 / a91n 9u I t D is r / I j a ° 10.3 4 I °h 6g / �..� rya 3a ,'(J _ 30 `y I co _ 15,647 af137 / �- 14,554 of - M N \ _ / 2\ur Pine Tree „vin/this dr a,� \ - �� _ _ '/ J ao' ! " \ ).507 of \ l / 21.319 a\ - 31 1 9 0 of \ o ��", \ 24N<� \/w j 17 I^ ie zs.87z ar \ \ �,f. 32'\\. o II \ \Ilor \ o / * 1- N / I � p� 18 5fz408 \�I + J 1 x E~ oo n / 33.011 ar ,--20� EC] 2 t 1` oc 'N� i b / [� Q 15.192 of 11.364 afj S'� °' \- 1 \� I%•�- �L / _ t,/ 1�SCotioTIII i 1 - 174 sa N 341 a IX wt 7s { J. ,.� .. .. 3_.... .. ^ \ / J • aClty of Hugo a a I - p -I Fil Fil U 1 w rh ,loll Meath / Ca B j 934 Fr 5t� ( \\ r er Loveland y e� \ Cit of Flu - 1 I ;/ 62 Goadview % 934 / ' - 6 8 Good J. - 0 1�- �� g'S�' -Q - 6066�Goodview si \ p n G d Y yo Bn 2 r -1 TO Glr.� \nAve E G,q / I \ / Slowikowski U W \I I o Bina-c�istan? h5470 ceeew dviIx L---- u � � Kaylo Kwiatkowski Q I slob Gondaiew I a 3 woo Trl Cir drew Brumm \ 'o �r``\\ o�m`o _gym 6122 Goodvlew TrI Cir. ti " 111 - I l,l 100 0 100 200 i D HORIZONTAL: 1"=100' j LAST PLOTTED: 7/21/2017 10:39 AM OPERATOR: SMS DESIGNED DLF SHEET BY: DRAWN SA BY: ED CHECKCHECEEII RPA ATE OF PRELDENARY 4/24/2017 DATE OF FINAL: 00/00/20XX SHEET N0. -jL OF 6l SHEETS PROJECT NUMBER 16-1067 --- - - - --TT '--- �� ' z LS 6 i< ' I ' � � I � zall���,�,� ------ /r� I�—VIII w - AN 41 12 0: [1:3: 1 cr. K -- r /� / I ' L •tel• Tl Ar bilaLS 8 �- - - --♦ ov I r r — �Nj �ti / r Y /Q I V l — l ♦ r I4... �\\�/�`� �✓ /L _O`�� I / ion" MTmm—`IIIIIIIIIII` y LAST PLOTTED: 7/21/2017 9:41 AM OPERATOR: SMS DVILLA LOTS Signature: Expimlion Dale: 00/00/20XX REV. DATE DESCRIP 0 0 z SHEET BY: DRAWN MA BY: CHECKED RPA BY: ¢W Qoz 4/24/2017 xo w� 00/00/20XX U d SHEET NO. Z OF 61 SHEETS PROJECT NUMBER 16-1067 W � E U x a DESIGNED DCF SHEET BY: DRAWN MA BY: CHECKED RPA BY: DATE OF PRELIMINARY 4/24/2017 DATE OF FINAL: 00/00/20XX SHEET NO. Z OF 61 SHEETS PROJECT NUMBER 16-1067 I i I ' I ' � I 1� ' UNT TO CLEARWATER CREEKCREA I SEASONALLY FLOODED BASIN BUFFER 0.24 ACRE 013 ACRE 0 Y / - .52 ACRES 2 — ------ — - — --- --- 2 - 0 CR 1 IF 25' BUFFER -7. .19 ACR r.. r. dl V CR 1 0.15 ACREEJ 1 r Q / i / \ / T (SEASONALLY FLOODED BASI&e 4. 0.38 ACRES BUFFER � 0.45 A RE � P I OR- rV � JY 1 I I � ��� V I I 1 I 25' BUFFER - 0.21 ACRE tS8 � I FRESH (WET) MEADOW I0.83 ACRES ��/ II IIIA}{��r''" f, ,I I II` 0.05 j LAST PLOTTED: 7/21/2017 9:42 AM OPERATOR: SMS N -- -- - -- --- -- - - --_ r 0.05\ $„ o _ > ffi Ni eb _-. � l ef 0.09'CRE LS 6 �� � � � � � II♦ __ i f � r m to a � `.� e I ��i � /ice ���' L'� �� •tea o � — Lss` ,--� � [!I?tom a pV1EW TFP� H � �/ r � w a 0.05 ACRE I� r � SEAL 150 0 150 300 Lip "m_.IIIIIII�HORIZONTAL: 1"=150' LEGENDSgn,tre — PROPERTY LINE li vpnto' Dote. mm�nrznxx WETLAND v r / 0.01 a REV. DATE DESCRIP IMPACTED WETLAND 0 (0.33 ACRES - 2015 WETLAND DELINEATED AREA) (0.31 ACRES - 2005 WETLAND DELINEATED AREA) MITIGATED WETLAND \ / J (1.73 ACRES - 2015 WETLAND DELINEATED AREA) (0.00 ACRES - 2005 WETLAND DELINEATED AREA) T_Tz PLANTING PLAN FOR MITIGATION SITES EXCAVATE AND GRADE TO DESIGN PLANS. GRADED SLOPES AND BASIN SHALL jr \I BE LEFT ROUGH TO CREATE MICRO TOPOGRAPHY. SOILS SURFACE SHALL BE \ LIGHTLY RAKED. SEED SHALL BE BROADCAST VIA HAND-HELD EQUIPMENT ORHYDRG. a SEED MIEES WI un SEED MIXES WILL BE OBTAINED FROM SHOOTING STAR NATIVE SEED, WHICH x SUPPLIES MINNESOTA BOARD OF WATER AND SOIL (BWSR) SEED MIXES FOR O C y WETLAND RESTORATION PROJECTS (HTTP://WWW.SHOOTINGSTARNATIVESEED.COM/SEED/SEED-MIXES/BWSR-MIXES/). IIII MITIGATION SITES A& B \ ' r WETLAND TYPE: SEASONALLY FLOODED BASIN Q Q O FALL OF BUILD YEAR: t/] I I / SATURATED/MOIST SOIL ZONES - WETLAND TEMPORARY MIXTURE SEEDED Q ly-i _1 \ (BWSR SEED MIX: WTI) AT 20 LBS/ACRE W ~ I I� U 0.05'ACRE DRY BUFFER ZONES - UPLAND TEMPORARY MIXTURE (BWSR SEED MIX: UT1) a AT 40 LBS/ACRE a U 1 I w SPRING OF YEAR 1 GROWING SEASON: W o SATURATED/MOIST SOIL ZONES - NATIVE WET PRAIRIE SEED MIXTURE (BWSR SEED MIX: W3) AT 6.5 LBS/ACRE I` DRY BUFFER ZONES - NATIVE MESIC PRAIRIE SEED MIX (BWSR SEED MIX: J / / U8) AT 15 LBS/ACRE H F a I 1 I MITIGATION SITE C W ,UW, WETLAND TYPE' WET MEADOW FALL OF BUILD YEAR: a " DESIGNED DLI; ' a / SATURATED/MOIST SOIL ZONES - WETLAND TEMPORARY MIXTURE SEEDED (BWSR SEED MIX: WTI) AT 20 LBS/ACRE DRAWN ILT 002 ACRE M� / - ` - _ DRY BUFFER ZONES - UPLAND TEMPORARY MIXTURE (BWSR SEED MIX: UT1) AT 40 LBS/ACRE SPRING OF YEAR 1 GROWING SEASON: SATURATED/MOIST SOIL ZONES - NATIVE SEDGE/WET MEADOW SEED 017 ACRE 2t{ 4/24/2(17 MIXTURE (BWSR SEED MIX: W2) AT 5 LBS/ACRE 00/00/20XX SHEET NO. 8 OF 61 SHEETS DRY BUFFER ZONES - NATIVE MESIC PRAIRIE SEED MIX (BWSR SEED MIX: U8) AT 15 LBS/ACRE DESIGNED DLI; SHEET BY: DRAWN ILT BY: ^ CHECKED BY: RRPA]l\tJJ DATE OF PREUMINARY 4/24/2(17 DATE OF FINAL: 00/00/20XX SHEET NO. 8 OF 61 SHEETS PROJECT NUMBER 16-1067 GIM utlot LEI LS 6 0 O i 0 ' ; � /�� i /, _� �❑ � � � 1 rel,;. �, _ / ❑ ��r �❑ ❑ l OCutlot CRI ❑ I❑I❑I[�l o�❑/ o� / r � �'sq Outlot CL/ ❑I❑ I❑L- �/ S CR1 _ i " ���❑ /' � ❑ or � � � ell r �0 51° �� ' O � � � -'o ,❑ of � ;�:.' �� �mrr,rr�- - _ - 1 a� ;� �I _ � O_ ❑ ❑� ❑ . 1, r I Outlo ..H.. : ^/❑ �00� / r., uuTlol r ❑�' � --��.�-_ � �� �P . v �r 1 � loo ❑ �—� 1 11— ❑ �-� = �'�❑10� 1 yam. -- I ❑❑ El El —1 1, Outlot II Ci------ ' I 'IO � I I 1 x " n Ll ❑� LS 1 _ , �❑ 1 ' z ❑ ❑ iiLt _ r ` I ! O o Li o r A IIS y LAST PLOTTED: 7/21/2017 9:43 AM OPERATOR: SMS 150 0 150 300 HORIZONTAL: 1"=150' Signature: Erpiratl.n Dale: 00/00/20XX REV. DATE DESCRIP 0 DESIGNED DLF SH S a O Q W xRc z 01T- DATE OF PRELIMINARY 4/24/2017 DATE OF FINAL: 00/00/20XX SHEET NO. 9 OF 61 SHEETS PROJECT NUMBER 16-1067 E E - F W m 0 a DESIGNED DLF SH S BY: DRAWN JLT ^ 'IJ.Jj CHECKED HECEED R -PA BY: DATE OF PRELIMINARY 4/24/2017 DATE OF FINAL: 00/00/20XX SHEET NO. 9 OF 61 SHEETS PROJECT NUMBER 16-1067 BUILDING SIDE ELEVATIONS FB -LO SB -WO (FULL BASEMENT- --------(SHALLOW BASEMENT - LOOKOUT BASEMENT) I VFr WALKOUT)------- Gp�p TOP OF FINISH FLOOR i GF' TOP OF L FOUNDATION R FOUNDATION 3.5' AND FINISH FLOOR —~ Gp 0.5' 9' 9' BASEMENT FLOOR 1 3 BASEMENT FLOOR FINISH GRADE FINISH GRADE SB -TL SG (SHALLOW BASEMENT - (SLAB ON GRADE) ------- TRANSOM LOOKOUT) i GF' FINISH FLOOR i (� TOP OF i pRy, ——P�pC' FOUNDATION G I 0.5 TOP OF 9 FINISH GRADE FOUNDATION BASEMENT FLOOR AND FINISH FLOOR FINISH GRADE I il�lg�111 III I I � 1 I IIIll2 I m I I IIS o 3 I I I TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC C \ / / CURB CU AT END FOR DRAINAGE / � D 2) 26_ 25_ 24 Z � w I (se -,L 1s 2 1 11 i 11934 i �i h; I ,No • / / _ i �20 MD I CR 1 / 111/ C0 ERNN �B / o dSg N �.1 �I 1 YIIL _1 \V X31 o I I — i n EXISTING MATURE TREES TO REMAIN\p/'/b 9 — —� ��•� (/•///, / _� �1�1 ���I , j `lam i y LAST PLOTTED: 7/21/2017 9:51 AM OPERATOR: SMS WASKA ia; J/ LEGEND r ,•s ��\ $ SOIL BORING x IQ O& ,_, SG - SLAB ON GRADE REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE SILT FENCE ;� 98 STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION qL UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD -VERIFY DITCH CHECK Signature: LO - LOOKOUT t �� l —930— CONTOUR WO - WALKOUT --930-- INPLACE CONTOUR •��,-�� I/ / 00/00/20XX CATCH BASIN I/ )) / ` • MANHOLE v APRON STORM SEWER 1�\ � I INPLACE STORM SEWER / i I 1 x = RIGHT OF WAY 50TYPICAL 7.5' Mei BUILDING PAD UNLESS LABELED OTHERWISE 3 / N - - - - - - BUILDING SETBACK J +• a/ / / 931.5 S TYPICAL LOT / W 2u FOUNDATION ia; J/ �°, r ,•s LOT NUMBER FB - FULL BASEMENT SB - SHALLOW BASEMENT e x IQ O& ,_, SG - SLAB ON GRADE REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE - ;� 98 HOUSE STYLE ) /7I/ UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD -VERIFY ? Signature: LO - LOOKOUT t �� l O ^J 25' F� T1 WO - WALKOUT s BUILDING SETBACK Exp'raton Date. 00/00/20XX TL - TRANSOM LOOKOUT J f Y Q BUILDING SETBACK ' J 937.0 PROPOSED LOWEST OPENING ELEV. = 50TYPICAL 7.5' Mei BUILDING PAD UNLESS LABELED OTHERWISE 3 / II FB -LO TYPE OF HOUSE J +• a/ / / 931.5 (SEE BUILDING SIDE ELEV. DETAIL) 2 / W 2u PROPOSED LOW FLOOR ELEV. `Z 940.0 PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. -J SG (SEE BUILDING SIDE ELEV. DETAIL) DRAINAGE ARROW _ 25' 7.5' STREET I 3 PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. I 1 I / Ij F- TYPICAL VILLA LOT �a z 0 N O `V W P4 0. DESIGNED DLF �l FOUNDATION • ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISH SURFACE/GUTTER Y: x GRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ,_, SG - SLAB ON GRADE REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE - DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. �$ �� 1I r `Ni � UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD -VERIFY LOT NUMBER 33 Signature: ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN. HORIZONTAL: 1"=150' 25, BUILDING SETBACK Exp'raton Date. 00/00/20XX J f Y Q 937 PROPOSED LOWEST OPENING ELEV. dR = 40 II Q O TYPICAL BUILDING PAD n UNLESS LABELED OTHERWISE REV. DATE DESCRIP / W 2u VILLA TYPE OF HOUSE SG (SEE BUILDING SIDE ELEV. DETAIL) _ 7.5' I 3 PROPOSED GARAGE FLOOR ELEV. 37. F- / I DRAINAGE ARROW lY 25' STREET � BORING SURFACE OBSERVED GROUND I LOCATION ELEV. WATER ELEV. Q bw� II ST -1 930.882 923.5 ST -2 935.816 928.4 r�-i I•+ -I O i ST -3 931.416 928.1 y� I ST -4 928.807 926.6 ST -6 933.335 928.0 �y Z µ� 1 II m DETERMINING WATER ELEVATIONS: U O1 HISTORIC HIGH GROUNDWATER ELEVATION - 930 CRITICAL EVENT 100 -YEAR SURFACE WATER ELEVATION - 930 Q E -I I ONEKA LAKE HIGHEST RECORD WATER ELEVATION - 932.3 ; ] I w = ONEKA LAKE ORDINARY HIGH WATER ELEVATION - 931.2 U 0 EROSION CONTROL NOTES: a Q P U ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE V / w PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE .. ;o ry ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED Imo/ (/%) Il I I • m INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL. O I t� J •' TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAY BALES, ECT., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE E, t I I = INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. ALL STREET DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END E. w � � \ \ r OF EACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. w Q O w DESIGNED DLF GENERAL GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES: BY: • ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISH SURFACE/GUTTER Y: \' GRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. ,_, REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE - DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. _ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING 00/00/20XX UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD -VERIFY 150 0 150 300 PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN. HORIZONTAL: 1"=150' ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES. POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES. DESIGNED DLF SHEET BY: AWN DRJLT Y: 11 CHECKED RPA B BY: DATE OF PRELDENARY 4/24/2017 DATE OF FINAL: 00/00/20XX SHEET NO. 11 OF 61 SHEETS PRWECT NUMBER 16-1067 ------- --- l�D' a n ot LS 6 I I I I z I /22 ;10 r z I , / 3 / // zo , • O _ ' a Ag O / 10 Y t ��•;, 0 � F / � s i I I' ----- --I ---- — — — — — — — / t 0 6 -- ---------------- a II I OOu tlot _ _ _ _ s �° II ' m s9\ "� �l ) l'i• W 7' ° r GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: �- /\ / THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR G1 ' 1—- -\ _ 1 , TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY q 1 a O��_ a udot 1 2 DIFFERENCES. a r � / � OODVIEW-"1TRg1L � � r o d I I r / ss 10 9 al \ Th / / I UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONSTRUCTION W - = TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF � HUGO GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DETAIL PLATES >\ a� I I I — r is FOR THE STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION, THE EDITION v � � r OF THE "STANDARD UTILITY SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATERTER AND SEAL 3SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM "/ /—I� / �/ /••• SEWER INSTALLATION BY THE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF 3 ss _ 12 13 1G I4 J J MINN.", AND TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION" MINN. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, ---OCTOBER 23, 2015 INCLUDING THE CURRENT ADDENDUM. THE s 3 1 u Ss CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES i a �'� —� az \ \ \ \ \ / // is ` / �\ Ir ) `l I ��:• AS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. 31 \ \ /b.. " �'\ / / " r� Signature: 13 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL ,�• J i / 30 \ \ 1 �3 \ _ \ / I f WORK OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LIMITS. Expiration Date: 00ro0/20XX zz za xs 12° 1.\/ r VERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOCA11ONS AND ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO 23 \ I / 1 rll BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. z I I Z / / L / REV. DATE DESCRIP Outlo r/ I z I �` I ` v I �1 • �' THE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM OF I (/ I 11 / �'=! 1 •'B" �\ ' 9 s ra 7.5 FT. OF COVER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE CITY -� / n xe / T s r r, AT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO CHECK LOCATION AND z' o�\ Ll / / s }' \/ I , I;' MATERIAL TYPE. Q THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" 1� a , �/ le/ \ Q• / �, / ` r FOR THE UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION. 3� Oullot I I 3 / j \ ( 1 1 MAINTAIN MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10' /\ \y/ p AI �' la I ss I x / / a / \ �/ ' \/ i I'. HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER. 14 10 a= �$16 5 Oudot II i to 1 I I I I o l ze / IS a I w"I I I a9 % Iv I _ xx � a � BY: W AWN DRSMS Y: 18 x c F' WzO Q 4 U W F" C7 DATE OF HNAL: 00/00/20XX Q PRWECT NUMBER 16-1067 �� ,� i r ; � W F h xz \ x I > W \ �5 ¢ \ l r o / I 1 1 3 `I � s bsiation -�L — — — — — — — — —, 150 0 150 300 HORIZONTAL: 1"=150' y LAST PLOTTED: 7/21/2017 9:57 AM OPERATOR: SMS DESIGNED DLF SHEET BY: AWN DRSMS Y: 18 CHECKED RPA BY: DATE OF PRELMNARY 4/24/2017 DATE OF HNAL: 00/00/20XX SHEET NO. 19 OF 61 SHEETS PRWECT NUMBER 16-1067 � � a CM --- -___ ___--- - --- 27 1x6 25 zagg�4411 O p i9 Outlot?. v`oiM y M A e• DIP \/ L5 66 8• PVC z 1 22 1210 3 21 21 1.4 z 2. O m I / 14 15 19 io 1 / U' / �19�� I N� � �Y ♦ V �/: 0 Ci riiy„ �� I I /� a! .e '►'� 1 1 1 1 11 / 5 �` r J 11 t 0� - -e----- -------- �I / Outlot �� ' DlP CR e• DIP 11 =a s /I 111 / Y J8 7 as f ! W II 1 1 r ! \ e GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: u�u 2 3 42 I I \ / .' s THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR q I / TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY q 7 Outlot DIFFERENCES. laB .....— y I UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONSTRUCTION w TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY OF W HUGO GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DETAIL PLATES 0. 37 FOR THESTREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION, THE 1999 EDITION " 6 \ \ I u zl z°— 19 17 \ / " r OF THE STANDARD UTILITY SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER AND SEAL I = /` SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM ;1 3% / 1_I / Ss \/ I� /% SEWER INSTALLATION BY THE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF ' l I r — — m �— — 3✓ is " 6 12 I 13 16 §+/a� \ =4 9 / 11 MINN.", AND TO THE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION" MINN. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, OCTOBER 23, 2015 INCLUDING THE CURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES AS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY. 4 13 �' a• r l " Y 1 signature: II II ~ ,e9• 1 30 \ \, Y 1 �3\e\°�P /L� ` TIIp \ II f WORK OUTSIDEOF THEPROPERTY LIMITS. Expiration PERMITS FOR ALL �iration Date: nnromznxx j}o �- — - — — --- 1 / z3 -2s -- 9 ---\ g Gr1 / z 1c10 ` .\� " VERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO rll BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. zz I I 2 REV. DATE DESCRIP / v� �• / I ` " / 1 i Outlo Vj I �/ (' 1HE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MINIMUM OF If "B" // �% / 0 r• J s 2 +a 7.5 FT. OF COVER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE CITY 27 2e °°o AT -BUILT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO CHECK LOCATION AND /tF` / ` 4 J MATERIAL TYPE. Q THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR THE UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION. <32 . s Ou' �' / + MAINTAIN MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10' llot 7 /\ 7.� •.Ad \�a HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN WATER AND SANITARY SEWER. Ss I 's/ I /� / / 14 /\ qmA� s 4 � � ' 1 � I III 1' — II � = —�,�� u / GOp`1F•��'�' � I� r Outlot j \ 9• PyC L58 J I s s I ..D„ o I I I 8• DIP —-------- ; II' a19 a� I I I DI / I n I >z I of I zs zs �_4 \ i_g• PVC P 6 s9 /W aI13 n1-1 o iia I II z z7 Q 1 I 4 spbsfation � I •�. I � // ly / \ \/ � \ 3a \ a 1 \ � y �I IAtll` i�' - I I I I� ' ` / \ \\3 �/ / /I/ v I le \ 331 � _ � � � ♦ \/,'•. 3. '--- R I y LAST PLOTTED: 7/21/2017 10:02 AM OPERATOR: SMS LEGEND � CATCH BASIN • MANHOLE . APRON iY FIRE HYDRANT U STORM SEWER con INPLACE STORM SEWER —J— SANITARY SEWER > INPLACE SANITARY SEWER —M— WATER LINE »' INPLACE WATER LINE --— RIGHT OF WAY 150 0 150 300 HORIZONTAL: 1"=150' DESIGNED DLF SHEET BY: DRAWN JLT BY: ECKED RPA CHECKED 5 DATE OF PRELDENARY 4/24/2017 DATE OF FINAL: 00/00/20XX SHEET NO. 25 OF 6I SHEETS PROJECT NUMBER 16-1067 � xo� a c7 C7 x x wwZ Q O U w� con U cn E O � E U x w DESIGNED DLF SHEET BY: DRAWN JLT BY: ECKED RPA CHECKED 5 DATE OF PRELDENARY 4/24/2017 DATE OF FINAL: 00/00/20XX SHEET NO. 25 OF 6I SHEETS PROJECT NUMBER 16-1067 d°f I -O°�Y tliiVl >Q a I '� I q�YT y' c6� , h, ■ .4� � � � gs. �� M�' / OIC, �• � a 9 r0is�its /J AW 150 0 150 300 HORIZONTAL: 1"=150' Signature. E,Oration 000; 00/0m20XX REV. DATE DESCRIP L7 W xx� aZ ¢¢ ww Qoz Qa cnH� it U U ¢ H F . ri E E W rxn 0 a s Qi'� °°t � .� i "� �► '� 'ilf 11riY� gyp} �i�s lid e asp w. � CI !In'•`tl��'�;•r,�llt -.-..__ " . _�__ __..._ _ _ - _... - - -."_ __ JID""�Sill11 NG MA�REMEM �;. . n-.. - AM O . _ .. „ a 9 r0is�its /J AW 150 0 150 300 HORIZONTAL: 1"=150' Signature. E,Oration 000; 00/0m20XX REV. DATE DESCRIP DESIGNED DLF SHEET BY: AWN DRAWN 51 CHECKED RPA BY: ATE OF PRELIMINARY 4/24/2017 DATE OF FINAL: 00/o0/20XX SHEET N0. 5I OF 61 SHEETS PROSECT NUMBER 16-1067 L7 W xx� aZ ¢¢ ww Qoz Qa cnH� U U ¢ H F . ri E E W rxn 0 a DESIGNED DLF SHEET BY: AWN DRAWN 51 CHECKED RPA BY: ATE OF PRELIMINARY 4/24/2017 DATE OF FINAL: 00/o0/20XX SHEET N0. 5I OF 61 SHEETS PROSECT NUMBER 16-1067 F \� may% z� K / lL� w: » ! © -, \;f2. \ ( All _� \\ a rt.. �;�i���V r����f�� �■ --rteAt I IMS �." ��,.. 'i#SFr � "+�;�!' k. • ' r I �arRli,♦wy� a �1141111,ffiffll REF Hill HIM 1'1111 1 1111111 H Hill Ifill II 1111! 11111/111 11111' I11v '?� IIllI II II i VIII VIII IIIIl 11111 E -F pot look, IIIII 11111111111 Ell lD � T°�`v C Planco Inc. --A Fm tV .4" La Af C C ID LU 012 rn to bt -jr m lD � T°�`v C Planco Inc. --A Agenda Number CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Memorandum TO: Hugo Planning Commission FROM: Sarah Rumppe, Community Development Intern SUBJECT: Small Cells DATE: November 30, 2017 for the Planning Commission meeting of November 6, 2017 1. BACKGROUND: As cellular technology becomes increasingly important in our everyday lives, the demand for cell providers, better coverage, and data has spurred requests for new cellular towers and equipment. Current regulations for cellular equipment were drafted at a time when antennas were large, bulky and bolted to the tops of towers. Although traditional "macrocell" technologies are still highly relevant, there are variety of smaller and more sophisticated options in use today. Small cell facilities compliment macrocell facilities by boosting the amount of data the network can put out. These facilities are small enough to be mounted on existing structures such as light poles and power lines, which are often found in the public right-of-way (ROW). Small cell providers have met barriers when attempting to deploy new equipment in the ROW due to outdated regulations. As a result providers have pushed for an amendment to Minnesota's Right -of -Way statutes that became effective in May of 2017. The new law aims to simplify the process of locating or collocating facilities in the public ROW by allowing permitted use in all zoning districts except historic and residential. As a result, the City's permitting process and right-of-way ordinances are important means of exercising authority of the public ROW. The City should update its right-of- way ordinance per the new amendment. The City is also responsible for providing a draft colocation agreement and new permit for small cell technologies by November 30, 2017. 2. SUMMARY OF NEW LAW AND IMPLICATIONS FOR THE CITY A. Permitted Use Under new law, small cell providers are permitted to install or collocate small cell equipment on support structures in the right-of-way. This permitted use surpasses all reasons for denial except those regarding the health, safety and welfare of the public. The new law also and eliminates the use of moratoriums. Two zoning districts, residential and historic, do not assume permitted use and can require small cell providers to apply for the approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The City should update the conditional uses defined in the ordinance of these zones. Page 2 B. New/Updated Ordinance Cities are allowed to exercise their authority in managing where and how these facilities occupy the right-of-way through their ordinances. The small cell discussion is strictly limited to requests within the right-of-way, thus cities have the option to simply update their existing right-of-way ordinance, or create a separate telecommunications ordinance. Upon evaluating the statute as it pertains the Hugo, the City could simply update its existing right-of-way ordinance to incorporate criteria for small cell technologies. C. Small Cells Permit In addition to updating its ordinance, the City must have a small cells permit in place by November 30, 2017. This permit will complement the City's existing ROW, obstruction, and excavation permits, and will gather relevant information on the applicant and construction process. D. Leasing and Colocation Small cells facilities that collocate on existing structures may be subject to pay rent of up to $150 per year, with an additional $25 fee for maintenance. One challenge quickly identified by staff is Hugo's lack of City -owned structures in the ROW. The majority of structures i.e. light poles and power lines are owned privately by XCEL and Connexus Energy. The City will determine how to manage requests for colocation on these structures, and will provide colocation agreements for structures owned by the City. A draft of such agreement must be provided by November 30, 2017. 3. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: Small cell providers have new authority to locate equipment in the right-of-way. As our consumption of cellular data continues to increase, we can expect more requests for new facilities. Changes to the ordinance and a new permit will allow the City to have more control over where and how small cell providers install new equipment. Staff is seeking approval to execute the following: 1. Update the Zoning and Right -of -Way Ordinances as necessary 2. Develop a new Small Cells permit for facilities in the ROW 3. Draft a colocation agreement for small cells in the ROW Attachments: 1. League of Minnesota Citites Small Cells FAQ 2 �0 LEAGUE OF CONNECTING & INNOVATING MINNESOTA SINCE 1913 CITIES 2017 Telecommunications Right -of -Way User Amendments Permitting Process for Small Wireless Facilities Publication Date: August 1, 2017 (For information on related federal laws see LMC Information Memo "Cell Towers. Small Cell TechnoloL�ics. and Distributed Antenna Systems") Introduction: On May 30, 2017, Gov. Dayton signed into law a bill' amending Minnesota's Telecommunications Right - of -Way User Law2. The amendments cleared up any confusion about whether wireless providers are treated the same as other telecommunications right-of-way users under state law, but created a separate, streamlined permitting system for placement of small wireless facilities on city -owned structures in rights of way. Most of the bill provisions became effective on May 31, 2017, with the exception that the prohibition on moratoria does not take effect until January 1, 2018 for those cities that did not have a right- of-way ordinance in place on or before May 18, 2017, to give those cities an opportunity to enact an ordinance regulating their public rights-of-way. Also, the amendments allow cities to enter collocation agreements with telecommunications right-of-way users, if they choose, as long as the collocation agreement for small wireless facilities is made available in a substantially complete form no later than six months after the effective date of this act or three months after receiving a small wireless facility permit application from a wireless service provider. Where can I read the new law? Until revisions of the state statute occur to include bills passed this session, cities can find the amendments at 2017 Laws. Cha: )ter 94. Does the law require cities to do anything differently when regulating wireless providers attaching their equipment to city structures in the rights of way? Yes, the amendments create a separate permit process for small wireless facilities. The below checklist was prepared to serve as a guide for cities to use when amending existing telecommunications ordinances, but does necessarily cover all nuances of the new law and should not replace working with city attorneys to draft or amend existing ordinances. What is the purpose of Minnesota's Telecommunication Right -of -Way User Law? '-Chapter 94, Article 9 of the 2017 Regular Session, effective May 31, 2017. 1 Minn. Stat. §§ 237.162, 237.163. LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES 145 UNIVERSITY AVE. WEST PHONE: (651) 281-1200 FAX: (651) 281-1298 INSURANCE TRUST ST. PAUL, MN 55103-2044 TOLL FREE: (800) 925-1122 WE6:WWW.LMC.oRG In 1997, the Minnesota Legislature recognized the need for a state law providing local government units with the authority to regulate the use of public rights of way by telecommunications right-of-way users. The resulting Minnesota Telecommunications Right -of -Way User Law allows telecommunications right-of-way users to construct, maintain, and operate conduit, cable, switches (and now small wireless facilities), and related appurtenances and facilities along, across, upon, above, and under any public right of way, but subjects those users to local regulations by cities to manage their rights of way and to recover management costs. Can a city manage its right of way without doing anything? No, the city must adopt an enabling ordinance. A local government unit is not required to manage its rights of way, but most want to do so. As such, the local government authority must pass an ordinance exercising this authority. Many cities find that having a separate telecommunications right-of-way user ordinance (in addition to a general right-of-way ordinance) allows for better regulation of cell towers, small cell and other telecommunications equipment. Did the amendments in the 2017 laws impact all telecommunications right-of-way users? Some of the amendments impacted cities' regulations on all telecommunications right-of-way users, but the amendments also created a distinct set of regulations specifically for placement of small wireless facilities. With respect to the regulations that apply to all telecommunications right-of-way users, the law: ✓ Requires all telecommunications right-of-way users seeking to excavate or obstruct a public right of way to obtain a right-of-way permit to do so. ✓ Requires a telecommunications right-of-way user using, occupying, or seeking to use or occupy a public right of way for providing telecommunications services to register with the local government unit by providing the local government unit with specific information (set forth in the statute), and including authorization for periodic updates. ✓ Requires telecommunications right-of-way users to submit plans for construction and major maintenance, to provide reasonable notice of projects that may require excavation and obstruction of public rights of way. ✓ Provides for restoration by the telecommunication right-of-way user after excavation occurs, either in the form of doing the restoration work or reimbursing the local governmental unit for the cost of the restoration work. ✓ Allows recovery of right-of-way management costs through a fee for registration, a fee for each right- of-way permit or, when appropriate, a fee applicable to a telecommunications right-of-way user when that user causes the local government unit to incur costs because of actions or inactions of that user. Can a city charge a fee for using the right of way? Yes, because when cities manage rights of way, they incur costs. However, when cities charge right-of-way users, the fees must be calculated on a competitively neutral basis, and based on the actual costs incurred by the city in managing the public right of way. A fee for the cost of managing the right-of-way should reflect an allocation among all users of the public right-of-way, including the city itself. Can a city charge rent if a right-of-way user places equipment in the right of way? Yes. Nothing in the law prohibits a city from charging rent for the placement of technology or equipment by a telecommunications right-of-way user on a city owned structure. However, cities are limited in the amount of rent they can charge for collocation of small wireless facilities on city -owned structures. Fee limitations are described in the statute. If a city does not have an ordinance, can it pass a moratorium on processing any applications it receives until it can pass an ordinance? Probably not. The law prohibits cities from establishing a moratorium with respect to filing, receiving, or processing applications for right-of-way or small wireless facility permits, or for issuing or approving right- of-way or small wireless facility permits. However, for cities that did not have an ordinance enabling it to manage its right-of-way before or on May 18, 2017, the prohibition on moratoria does not take effect until January 1, 2018, giving those cities an opportunity to enact an ordinance regulating its public rights-of-way. Can a city still deny applications for siting of telecommunications equipment in its right of way? Generally, yes, however, any denial or revocation of either a right-of-way permit or a small wireless facility permit must be done in writing and must document the basis for the denial, including the health, safety and welfare reasons for the denial. The local government unit must notify the telecommunications right-of-way user, in writing, within three business days of the decision to deny or revoke a permit. If the city denies a permit application, the telecommunications right-of-way user may cure the deficiencies identified by the local government unit and resubmit its application. If the telecommunications right-of-way user resubmits the application within 30 days of receiving written notice of the denial, the city may not charge an additional filing or processing fee. The local government unit must approve or deny the revised application within 30 days after the submission of the revised application, or it is deemed granted. Can cities treat the siting of all cell equipment the same? It depends. If the city plans to regulate cell sitings and require telecommunications right-of-way users to get permits, then the 2017 amendments to the law create a separate permit system for small wireless facility technology that places additional limitations on a city's ability to regulate those specific types of technology. Does the new law mean our city cannot enter into a separate agreement with telecommunications right- of-way users who want to place equipment on city owned structures? The amendments do not require cities to have separate agreements, and some cities may choose to put these provisions in their ordinance or permit instead. For cities that want a separate `collocation agreement' in place, they must develop and make that collocation agreement available no later than six months after May 31, 2017 (the effective date of the act) or three months after receiving a small wireless facility permit application from a wireless service provider. "Collocate" or "collocation" means to install, mount, maintain, modify, operate, or replace a small wireless facility on, under, within, or adjacent to an existing wireless support structure that is owned privately or by a local government unit. The template of the agreement must be made available in a substantially complete form. The parties to the separate small wireless facility collocation agreement always may incorporate additional mutually agreed upon terms and conditions. Also, the law now clearly classifies any small wireless facility collocation agreement between a local government unit and a wireless service provider as public data accessible to the public under Minnesota's Data Practices Law. What type of equipment is subject to the special requirements on small cell technology? The statute defines type of equipment, which include: "Small wireless facility": (1) A wireless facility that meets both following qualifications: (i) Each antenna is located inside an enclosure of no more than six cubic feet in volume or, in the case of an antenna that has exposed elements, the antenna and all its exposed elements could fit within an enclosure of no more than six cubic feet. (ii) All other wireless equipment associated with the small wireless facility, excluding electric meters, . concealment elements, telecommunications demarcation boxes, battery backup power systems, grounding equipment, power transfer switches, cutoff switches, cable, conduit, vertical cable runs for the connection of power and other services, and any equipment concealed from public view within or behind an existing structure or concealment, is in aggregate no more than 28 cubic feet in volume. (2) A micro wireless facility. "Wireless support structure" means a new or existing structure in a public right of way designed to support or capable of supporting small wireless facilities, as reasonably determined by a local government unit. "Collocate" or "collocation" means to install, mount, maintain, modify, operate, or replace a small wireless facility on, under, within, or adjacent to an existing wireless support structure that is owned privately or by a local government unit. What additional requirements must cities consider to comply with Minnesota's Telecommunications Right -of -Way User Law, as amended? The law sets forth specific requirements related to placement of small wireless facilities or installation of new wireless support structures. The below information highlights items cities will want to consider when drafting an ordinance or amending an existing ordinance. Again, cities should work with their city attorneys to ensure full compliance with the law. Also, cities should be mindful of the potential applicability of Section 6409(a) of the Middle Class Tax Relief and Joe Creation Act of 2012, codified at 47 U.S.C. § 1455, to collocations. NEW STATE LAW REQUIREMENTS GOVERNING PLACEMENT OF SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES IN RIGHTS OF WAY If a city decides to regulate or require permits for placement of a new wireless support structure or collocation of a small wireless facility, then the city should be aware that: ❑ Small wireless facilities and wireless support structures are a permitted use, except that in districts zoned as simle-family residential use or district identified as historic i either 4 by federal law or ordinance), a local government unit can require a conditional use permit. ❑ Cities must not require an applicant for a small wireless facility permit to provide any information that the applicant previously had provided to the city in a different application for a small wireless permit (which the applicant must identify by specific reference number). ❑ Cities must not require an application to provide information that is not reasonably necessary to review a permit application for compliance with generally applicable and reasonable health, safety, and welfare regulations, or to demonstrate compliance with applicable Federal Communications Commission regulations governing radio frequency exposure, or other information required by this section. ❑ Permits for small cell facility collocation or placement of a new wireless support structure must specify that the term of a small wireless facility permit equals the length of time that small wireless facility is in use, unless the permit is revoked under this section. ❑ The total application fee for a small wireless facility permit must comply with the statutory requirement regarding costs related to the permit. ❑ The city must allow applicants for small wireless facility permits to file a consolidated permit application to collocate up to 15 small wireless facilities (or a greater number if agreed to by a local government unit), provided that all the small wireless facilities in the application are located within a two-mile radius, consist of substantially similar equipment, and are to be placed on similar types of wireless support structures. ❑ The city has 90 days after the date a small wireless facility permit application is filed to issue or deny the permit, or the permit is automatically issued. *Keep in mind that this time frame may be shorter if the federal Middle Class Tax Relief and Joe Creation Act of 2012, codified at 47 U.S.C. § 1455 applies. ❑ To toll the 90 -day clock, the city must provide a written notice of incompleteness to the applicant within 30 days of receipt of the application, identifying all missing documents or information, and providing the applicant with a time to cure that complies with the statute'. Remember to also consult ❑ If the city receives applications within a single seven-day period from one or more applicants seeking approval of permits for more than 30 small wireless facilities, the city may extend the 90 -day deadline by an additional 30 days. If a city elects to invoke this extension, it must inform in writing any applicant to whom the extension will be applied. ❑ A city cannot require placement of small wireless facilities on any specific wireless support structure other than the one proposed in the permit application. 'Minn. Stat. §237.163, Subd. 3c(b). ❑ A city must not limit the placement of small wireless facilities, either by minimum separation distances between small wireless facilities or maximum height limitations, except that each wireless support structure installed in the right of way after the effective date of this act shall not exceed 50 feet above ground level (unless the local government unit agrees to a greater height). ❑ A city can set forth in its ordinance separation requirements for placement of wireless support structures in relation to other wireless support structures. ❑ A city still may deny permit for health, safety, and welfare reasons or for noncompliance with decorative wireless support structures or signs. ❑ A city cannot require a person to pay a small wireless facility permit fee, obtain a small wireless facility permit, or enter into a small wireless facility collocation agreement solely in order to conduct routine maintenance of a small wireless facility; replace a small wireless facility with a new facility that is substantially similar or smaller in size, weight, height, and wind or structural loading; or install, place, maintain, operate, or replace micro wireless facilities suspended on cables strung between existing_ utility poles in compliance with national safety codes. ❑ A city cannot require an applicant to apply for or enter any individual license, franchise, or other agreement with the local government unit or any other entity, other than the optional standard small wireless facility collocation agreement. ❑ A city may require notice of any work that will obstruct a public right of way. OPTIONAL PROVISIONS FOR SMALL WIRELESS FACILITIES ❑ A city is not required to have a separate agreement, but can choose to enter collocation agreements with applicants locating small wireless facilities onto city owned structures to address terms and conditions of the use of the structures. If a city chooses to do so, then it must make the agreement available to the public in a substantially complete format no later than six months after the effective date or three months after receiving a small wireless facility permit application from a wireless service provider. ❑ A city may elect to charge each small wireless facility attached to a wireless support structure owned by the local government unit a fee (rental fee), in addition to other fees or charges allowed under the law, consisting of (1) up to $150 per year for rent to occupy space on a wireless support structure; (2) up to $25 per year for maintenance associated with the space occupied on a wireless support structure; and (3) an additional monthly fee for electricity used to operate a small wireless facility, if not purchased directly from a utility, at the rate set forth in the statute.4 4 Minn. Stat. 237.163, Subd. 6 (d). 0 11/212017 Events - White Bear Area Chamber of Commerce (651) 429-8593 (httF( `tWHITE BEAR HOME (/) CHAMBER (/CHAMBER. HTML) BUSINESS (/BUSINESS. HTML) EM ADVOCACY (/ADVOCACY.HTML) EVENTS (/EVENTS.HTML) JOB MATCH (/JOB-MATCH.HTML) MORE... Submit Your Event (http://www.chamberarganizer.com/Calendar/submit_ event.php?org_id=WBAC) PLEASE NOTE: The Chamber offers a I I"._FNDAR (http://www.OfficialCalendarNetwork.cos system that can host all events for the community. Request calendar code from the Chamber for your own website. Will show only your events on your website, but all events are automatically added the the official calendar for the White Bear Area Region. White Bear Area Chamber of Commerce - Event Information Event Name: Legislative Reception Event Type(s): Chamber Event Description: Legislative Reception Thursday, November 16th Tria Restaurant 5959 Centerville Rd North Oaks 5:00-7:30pm It is vital that business owners have access to their elected officials. As a Chamber member you have more influence than any lobbyist when it comes to addressing concerns you may have about our local and state business climate.. This event is an awesome opportunity to make valuable business connections, have a direct conversation with your local legislators, enjoy fabulous appetizers and a cash bar! There is no charge to attend this important event, but registration is required. Thank you to our sponsors: Gft 11 -D CASINO Oi- Premier NBG Banks.. Yf MILUE LACS White Bear Area Chamber of Commerce 4751 Highway 61 White Bear Lake, MN 55110 (651)429-6593 Our Mission "Strengthen Business through Advocacy, Networking and Education." http://www.whitebearchamber.com/events.html 1/1 November 2017 November 2017 December 2017 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 1 2 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 26 27 28 29 30 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Oct 29 30 31 Nov 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 6:30pm BOZA 7:00pm City Council Meeting 7:00pm Planning Commission 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 7:00pm Parks 5:00pm Legislative Reception (Tris) 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 1:00pm Historical 5:00pm Burger Night Thanksgiving Holidav 7:00pm City Council Meeting Commission (Hugo Legion) 5:00pm EDA Meets 26 27 28 29 30 Dec1 2 Meetings in green are scheduled/posted meetings. 1 11/2/2017 10:25 AM December 2017 December 2017 January T Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 28 29 30 31 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Nov 26 27 28 29 30 Dec 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 7:OOpm City Council 7:OOpm Comp Plan Meeting Workshop - RESCHDULE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 7:OOpm Parks 5:30pm Holiday Party (American Legion) 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 1:OOpm Historical 6:30pm BOZA 7:OOpm City Council Meeting Lindau Commission 7:OOpm Planning 5:OOpm EDA Meets Commission 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 5:OOpm Burger Night (Hugo Legion) 31 Jan 1, 18 2 3 4 5 6 Meetings in green are scheduled/posted meetings. 2 11/2/2017 10:25 AM