HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017.08.10 PC MinutesMinutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of Thursday, August 10, 2017
Chair, Kleissler called the meeting to order at 7:08 p.m.
PRESENT: Arcand, Kleissler, McRoberts, Tjernlund.
ABSENT: Lessard.
STAFF: Bryan Bear, City Administrator
Rachel Juba, Planner
Rachel Leitz, Community Development Assistant
Approval of Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of July 27, 2017
Commissioner McRoberts made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Arcand, to approve minutes for the
meeting of July 27, 2017.
All Ayes. Motion carried.
Fable Hill 4th Addition Amendment to the Preliminary Plat and PUD
Juba presented on an application amending the preliminary plat and PUD for Fable Hill 4th Addition. Juba
stated that the requested applications would add three lots to the previous approval. In 2003, the Fable Hill
PUD General Plan was approved allowing 60 lots (14 single family and 46 detached villas) and the proposed
plan now shows 63 lots (9 single family and 54 detached villas). Juba described that 26 of the villa lots have
already been final platted. Juba stated that the revisions to the plan are relatively minor and the plan layout
maintains a development pattern that complies with the approvals for the Fable Hill PUD. Staff recommended
approval of the amendment to the preliminary plat and PUD, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution.
Commissioner Arcand asked if the proposed plan had any revisions to lot widths.
Juba stated that the lot widths have not changed from the previously approved PUD.
Commission McRoberts requested Juba give details on a resident’s e-mail that was received.
Juba explained that the Planning Commission received an e-mail from Lee Rodel, 4485 Fable Hill Pkwy.,
requesting the developer to have a construction entrance as this project continues to move forward. Juba stated
that she talked to Mr. Rodel and explained that the developer doesn’t own any adjacent property, therefore
having a separate construction access is difficult. Juba described that emergency services has reviewed these
plans and does not see a need for another outlet for these residents.
Chair Kleissler invited the applicant to the podium to speak.
David Hempel, Engineer for the project, approached the podium. Mr. Hempel stated that they were also
forwarded the e-mail from Mr. Rodel. He described the City’s guidelines for construction hours and stated that
they also have expectations of their contractors, whom are being monitored to ensure limited impact to
residents.
Commission McRoberts addressed a specific sentence in Mr. Rodel’s e-mail describing the developer making a
previous commitments for a separate construction access to this project. Commission McRoberts asked the
applicant if there were any previous commitments for this secondary access.
Len Pratt, developer, approached the podium. Mr. Pratt stated that he does not own or have control over
adjacent properties to be able to have a separate construction access. He stated that he has provided access to
Planning Commission
August 10, 2017
Page 2
these adjoining properties for future development. Mr. Pratt stated that he understands resident’s concerns
about traffic and he tries to have most of the construction that requires large trucks/equipment complete their
work within a shorter time frame.
Chair Kleissler opened the public hearing at 7:27 p.m.
Patrick Cahill, 4625 Fable Hill Rd. N., approached the podium. He asked the developer why the plan has a
decreased amount of single family homes and an increased number of villas, how the wetlands were going to be
impacted behind their home, and the timing of the construction of the roads.
Mr. Pratt stated that the wetlands will not be touched. He described the proposed plan and stated he believed
there was a more natural point to break up the villa product from the single family homes. Mr. Pratt stated that
they hope to have pavement and curb installed by October 2017.
Mr. Hempel stated that the plan will be developed in phases, therefore only the phase one roads will be
completed by October 2017.
Darren Carlson, 4633 Fable Hill Rd. N., approached the podium. He stated that Mr. Pratt has done a lot for the
Fable Hill development and community. He stated that there seems to be a lot of unnecessary traffic on his road
because people believe it outlets to Elmcrest. He asked the City if they could look into putting some signage up
stating the road was a dead end.
Juba stated that she would talk to the Public Works department about this concern.
John Devoe, 4736 Preserve Ct. N., approached the podium. Mr. Devoe expressed concerns about speeding and
people running stop signs in the development. He stated that Pratt has done an excellent job in the development
and doesn’t believe there is much traffic related to the construction of the homes. Mr. Devoe stated having
more signage, specifically regarding dead ends, may be helpful to residents in the neighborhood.
Matt Christenson, 4653 Fable Hill Rd. N., approached the podium. He stated that he was told that the homes
proposed to be constructed behind him were to be all single family homes. He is concerned that we are
allowing even more villas within the next phase of the development.
Mr. Pratt stated that the proposed plans always had villa homes within the next phase of development. He
stated that there is a large wetland complex the homes that separate the products.
Mr. Christenson stated that it’s not the separation of the housing products that’s the concern, its more about the
type of neighborhood and believing more families with young children would be moving into this
neighborhood.
Mr. Pratt stated that the market has dictated the product types and he wants to ensure the Fable Hill area
maintains the quality that’s currently seen there. He believed to do that, the product type and number has had to
change slightly with demand.
Chair Kleissler closed the public hearing at 7:42 p.m.
Chair Kleissler asked staff how the comments regarding stop signs and signage, specifically the dead end signs,
would be handled by staff.
Planning Commission
August 10, 2017
Page 3
Juba stated that the City has had discussions with the HOA about the stop signs, which were installed after the
development was constructed. She stated that she will talk to the public works department about dead end street
signs.
Commissioner Arcand asked staff what the stop sign discussion involved with the HOA.
Juba stated that concerns were brought up by the HOA that residents were speeding on the roads within Fable
Hill. The City and HOA collaborated and stop signs were installed within the development. One of the issues
seems to be that since the signs were installed after development occurred and weren’t planned during the
approval process, residents don’t expect stop signs in that area and therefore, are sometimes not abided by.
Commissioner Tjernlund stated he believed the proposed plans are minor adjustments from the previous
approval and has no issues with what is proposed.
Commissioner Arcand agreed.
Commissioner Tjernlund made a motion, Commissioner Arcand seconded, to recommend approval of the
amendment to the Preliminary Plat and PUD for Fable Hill 4th Addition, subject to the conditions listed in the
attached resolutions.
All Ayes. Motion carried.
Comprehensive Plan Update
Mary Matze with Landform Professional Services, the City’s contracted Planner, gave an update on the 2040
Comprehensive Plan Update, specifically regarding the land use chapter. Matze gave a background of
discussions surrounding the topic of eastern Hugo and the eastern Hugo open house. She summarized that staff
believed additional info from the feasibility study would be helpful in figuring out if development could occur
in this area in the future. Staff recommended that no changes are made to the current land use plan and the
Planning Commission allow staff to continue to meet with land owners and get a better feel for what eastern
Hugo residents want. Matze then discussed the mixed use land use designation. She stated that staff
recommended evaluating characteristics for each mixed use district to set better parameters for future
development. Matze described the topic of extending services to 165th Street N. She stated that staff
recommended reviewing the land use designations and evaluate timing and feasibility for extending services.
She also stated that staff will be having conversations with the property owners in that area to understand their
position. Lastly, Matze discussed the area of Elmcrest (north of Frenchman Rd.). She stated that staff
recommended reviewing the land use designations and understanding more thoroughly if those are appropriate
with planned upgrades to the roads, future connections, and the Lino Lakes land use plan. Matze concluded by
asking the Commissioners if any additional areas should be studied, if any areas needed to be omitted or if there
were any additional concerns.
Commissioner Arcand asked staff if comments regarding eastern Hugo came from eastern Hugo residents.
Juba stated that the majority of residents in attendance at the eastern Hugo workshop were from eastern Hugo.
She stated that staff focused on getting them to participate in the discussion through individual letters.
Planning Commission
August 10, 2017
Page 4
Commissioner Tjernlund asked for clarification on the options the City has for serving eastern Hugo in the
future and how the Met Council is involved.
Juba stated that the City could utilize the flexible development ordinance if residents in eastern Hugo wanted to
be served with sewer or not. In either case, land would be preserved either for future development or for natural
resources. She stated that staff believed people who attended the eastern Hugo workshop seemed happy with
how things are operating currently, which would mean no changes and a 1 unit per 10 acre density. Juba stated
that staff doesn’t believe we have enough information currently to determine if eastern Hugo should be in the
long term sewer service area or not. She described that since the feasibility study was never finished, the City
doesn’t know for a fact if it’s even reasonable to sewer a part of eastern Hugo. Juba believed it was reasonable
to finish the feasibility study to get more information on the options the City has moving forward.
Commissioner Tjernlund asked if by finishing the study it would give more concrete choices to our residents.
Juba stated that if the study is finished and there is an area that will never be able to be served by sewer, it opens
up conversations with the Met Council about potentially having reduced property sizes in that area.
Commissioner Tjernlund stated that he is glad completing this study will open the door for more answers for
Hugo residents. He then asked staff what the goal was for studying the mixed use areas.
Kendra Lindahl, Planner with Landform, stated that staff hopes to define the potential future uses in these areas
while comparing them with the other surrounding uses. She stated that it is staff’s goal for developers and
residents to better understand what they can do with their property.
Matze concluded with describing the next steps with the Planning Commission and reviewing future meeting
dates.
Adjournment
Commissioner McRoberts made a motion, Commissioner Arcand seconded, to adjourn at 8:18 p.m.
All Ayes. Motion carried.
Respectfully Submitted,
Rachel Leitz, Community Development Assistant