Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2018.06.04 CC PacketEST. 1906 00 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North - Hugo, MN 55038 A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. May 21, 2018, City Council Meeting E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. None Scheduled G. CONSENT AGENDA Agenda HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HUGO CITY HALL MONDAY, JUNE 4, 2018 — 7 P.M. All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion and a roll call vote. If a member of the City Council or the public wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approve Claims Roster 2. Approve Annual Performance Review for Utility Billing Clerk Jodie Guareschi 3. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Tom Smith 4. Approve Hiring of Pierre Giguere as Community Development Intern 5. Approve Pay Request No.1 to Diverse Construction Services for Fire Hall Roof 6. Approve Resignation of Adam Sauerwein from the Fire Department 7. Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for Oneka Place Residential Development H. AWARD OF BID 1. Receive Bids and Award Contract for the Oneka Lake Boulevard and Harrow Avenue Improvement Project I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. None Scheduled J. NEW BUSINESS None Scheduled K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. None Scheduled L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Update on Yellow Ribbon Network M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Hugo Good Neighbor Days June 7-10, 2018 N. ADJOURNMENT BACKGROUND MEMO FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON JUNE 4, 2018 DA Approval of Minutes for May 21, 2018 Council Meeting Staff recommends Council approve the minutes as presented. G.1 Approval of Claims Staff recommends Council approve the Claims Roster as presented. G.2 Approve Annual Performance Review for Utility Billing Clerk Jodie Guareschi Since June 17, 2002, Jodie has worked as the City's Utility Billing Clerk in the Finance Department. Jodie also works as a member of the Hugo Fire Department as a firefighter/EMS responder. Finance Coordinator Anna Wobse recommends Council approve the annual performance review for Utility Billing Clerk Jodie Guareschi. G.3 Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Tom Smith Tom Smith was hired by the City of Hugo on June 26, 2000 as a Worker in Public Works Department. Public Works Director Scott Anderson recommends Council approve the annual performance review for Public Works Worker Tom Smith. GA Approve Hiring of Pierre Giguere as Community Development Intern On May 16, 2018, staff interviewed six applicants for the Community Development Intern position. The position will assist the Community Development Department on a wide variety of planning and zoning related items over a six month period. The position will also coordinate with other departments as needed. Staff recommends approval of the hiring of Pierre Giguere as the Community Development Intern. G.5 Approve Pay Request No.1 to Diverse Construction Services for Fire Hall Roof The City has received Pay Request No. 1 for work completed to date on the Fire Hall roof. Staff recommends Council approve the Pay Request to Diverse Construction in the amount of $63,620.06. G.6 Approve Resignation of Adam Sauerwein from the Fire Department Adam Sauerwein has submitted his resignation from the Hugo Fire Department due to his relocation outside of Hugo. Fire Chief Kevin Colvard recommends Council approve the resignation of Adam Sauerwein. G.7 Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for Oneka Place Residential Development Len Pratt (CPDC Pratt Oakwood LLP.) is proposing to develop the 120-acre parcel formerly known as the LeRoux Parcel to include 177 single family homes. The development will be known as Oneka Place. To accommodate this development, the applicant is proposing to impact 0.91 acres of wetland. The remaining wetland on the property is not proposed to be impacted and the eastern 40 acres of the parcel, which contains a significant number of wetlands, is being dedicated to the City. Mr. Pratt is proposing to replace the impacts to these wetland basins through the purchase of wetland credits from an approved wetland bank. The requirements under the MN Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) have been met. Staff recommends approval of the Oneka Place wetland replacement plans. H.1 Receive Bids and Award Contract for the Oneka Lake Boulevard and Harrow Avenue Improvement Proiect At its April 16, 2018 meeting, the Council approved a resolution approving the plans and specification for the Oneka Lake Boulevard and Harrow Avenue street improvement project and ordering advertisement for bid. Staff received four bids and recommends Council award the contract to the low bidder, North Valley, Inc. in the amount of $764,657.16. L.1 Update on the Yellow Ribbon Network Council Member Chuck Haas and Phil Klein will report to Council on the Yellow Ribbon Network activities held recently. M.1 Hugo Good Neighbor Days June 7-10, 2018 Hugo Good Neighbor Days will be Thursday, June 7 — Sunday, June 10 at Lions Park. The Technicolor Run will be on Saturday at 9 a.m. with the parade following at 11. The Historical Commission will have their display in the Oneka Room on Saturday and Sunday from 9 a.m. - 5p.m. Many other activities will take place in the park. N. Adiournment 00 14654 Fitzgerald Avenue North - Hugo, MN 55038 Call to Order Mayor Weidt called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PRESENT: Haas, Klein, Miron, Petryk, Weidt ABSENT: None Minutes HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HUGO CITY HALL MONDAY, MAY 21, 2018 — 7 P.M. ALSO PRESENT: City Administrator Bryan Bear, City Attorney Dave Snyder, Planner Rachel Juba, Finance Director Ron Otkin, Parks Planner Shayla Denaway, and City Clerk Michele Lindau Approval of Minutes for the May 7, 2018, City Council Meeting Petryk made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the minutes for the City Council meeting held on May 7, 2018, as presented. All Ayes. Motion carried. Approval of Minutes for the May 15, 2018 Law Enforcement Memorial Day Klein made motion, Petryk seconded, to approve the minutes for the Law Enforcement Memorial held on May 15, 2018, as presented. All Ayes. Motion carried. Approval of the Agenda Weidt made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the agenda as presented All Ayes. Motion carried. Bayport American Legion Donation to the Hugo Yellow Ribbon Kelly Greene, assistant gambling manager for the Bayport American Legion, presented a donation to the Yellow Ribbon Network. Haas explained the Yellow Ribbon Network and Blue Star Mothers of America assisted the Legion in holding meat raffles during Bingo at Sal's Angus Grill on Saturdays in October, 2017 to April, 2018, and both organizations received a donation for $2,250. Presentation of GFOA Award for Excellence in Financial Reporting - Finance Director Ron Otkin Finance Director Ron Otkin had received notification from the Government Finance Officers Association of the United States and Canada that the Hugo Finance Department has received their 24th Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting. According to GFOA, this Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 21, 2018 Page 2 of 7 certificate is the highest form of recognition in governmental accounting and financial reporting, and its attainment represents a significant accomplishment by a government and its management. Haas made motion, Petryk seconded, to direct staff to create a press release to let the taxpayers know their dollars are being well spent. All Ayes. Motion carried. Approval of the Consent Agenda Miron made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the Consent Agenda with the removal of Item 3 (Hiring of John Benson) by Mayor Weidt. All Ayes. Motion carried. Miron made motion, Klein seconded, to rescind the previous motion. All Ayes. Motion carried. Weidt made motion, Miron seconded, to remove item 4 (Promotion of Rachel Juba) and approve the following Consent Agenda: Approve Claims Roster 2. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Rick Kieffer Approve Temporary Hiring of Former Building Official John Benson 4. Approve Reciprocal Emergency Service Agreement with White Bear Lake Fire Department Approve Leave of Absence for Firefighter Andy Luchsinger 6. Approve Application for Water Surface Use Permit for David Strub on Sunset Lake 7. Approve Application for Water Surface Use Permit for Mike Ball on Round Lake Approve Board of Trustees Request for Increase in Lump -Sum Pension 9. Approve Resolutions Approving Oneka Place Preliminary Plat and PUD 10. Approve Authorization to Apply for a Washington County CDA Predevelopment Grant All Ayes. Motion carried. Approve Claims Roster Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Claims Roster as presented. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Rick Kieffer Rick Kieffer was re -hired by the City of Hugo on May 31, 2005, returning after a short period of time in the private sector. Over the past 13 years, Rick has worked under the direction of Public Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 21, 2018 Page 3 of 7 Works Director Scott Anderson. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the annual performance review for Public Works Worker Rick Kieffer. Approve Reciprocal Emergency Service Agreement with White Bear Lake Fire Department The Hugo Fire Department had requested approval of the Reciprocal Emergency Services Agreement with the White Bear Lake Fire Department. This agreement would provide the best possible emergency services and automatic response to structure fires by making equipment, personnel, and other resources available to both departments as outlined in the agreement. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Reciprocal Emergency Services Agreement with the White Bear Lake Fire Department. Approve Temporary Hiring of Former Building Official John Benson John Benson served as the Building Official for the City of Hugo for 22 years before retiring in March, 2010. Due to increased workloads, current Building Official Chuck Preisler recommended that the City hire John to work for the City doing plan review on Tuesdays and Thursdays beginning May 22, 2018, at a pay rate of $30/hour plus mileage. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the hiring of John Benson as a temporary employee in the Building Department. Approve Leave of Absence for Firefighter Andy Luchsinger Firefighter Andy Luchsinger had requested a four -month leave of absence from the Hugo Fire Department for personal reasons effective May 5, 2018, to September 9, 2018. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Leave of Absence for Firefighter Andy Luchsinger. Approve Application for Water Surface Use Permit for David Strub on Sunset Lake On behalf of residents living on Sunset Lake, resident David Strub had made application to the City of Hugo for a Water Surface Use Permit to allow residents to water ski on the slalom course on the lake. Washington County Sheriff's Office had provided the application form that was completed by David Strub. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the application for a Water Surface Use Permit for a water skiing course on Sunset Lake. Approve Application for Water Surface Use Permit for Mike Ball on Round Lake On behalf of residents living on Round Lake, Resident Mike Ball had made application to the City of Hugo for a Water Surface Use Permit to allow residents to water ski on the slalom course on the lake and put a water ski jump on the lake. Washington County Sheriff's Office had provided the application form that was completed by Mike Ball. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the application for a Water Surface Use Permit for a water skiing course on Round Lake. Approve Board of Trustees Request for Increase in Lump -Sum Pension The Board of Trustees for the Hugo Firefighter's Relief Association formally requested City Council ratification of an increase of $200 per year of service in their lump -sum pension benefit. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 21, 2018 Page 4 of 7 The Finance Department had reviewed this request and found it to be financially feasible and consistent with the Pension Fiscal Policy adopted in April, 2012. Adoption of the Consent Agenda ratified the Board of Trustees' request for a $200 increase in their lump -sum pension benefit and corresponding change to their by-laws. Approve Resolutions Approving Oneka Place Preliminary Plat and PUD CPDC — Pratt — Oakwood, LLP, had requested approval of a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) for 177 single family residential lots and 10 outlots to be known as "Oneka Place" on 117.5 acres generally located on the north end of Oneka Lake Parkway, north of 159th Street. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the applications. The Parks Commission recommended approval of the park dedication proposal, with two conditions added to the resolutions. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved, and RESOLUTION 2018-14 APPROVING PUD GENERAL PLAN FOR CPDC — PRATT — OAKWOOD, LLP, FOR "ONEKA PLACE" ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF ONEKA PARKWAY AND NORTH OF 159TH STREET, and RESOLUTION 2018-15 APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR THE CPDC — PRATT — OAKWOOD, LLP, FOR "ONEKA PLACE" ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF ONEKA PARKWAY AND NORTH OF 159TH STREET, and ORDINANCE 2018-487 AMENDING CHAPTER 90 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED NORTH OF ONEKA PARKWAY AND NORTH OF 159TH STREET. Developer Len Pratt and David Hemple from Westwood Engineering, spoke briefly about the development explaining the houses will be a combination of products to include villa homes, single family homes, and larger single family homes similar to those in Prairie Village. The development is located in the Forest Lake School District, but residents will be permitted to open enroll in the White Bear Lake School District. Approve Authorization to Apply for a Washington County CDA Predevelopment Grant Washington County CDA had provided an opportunity to apply for pre -development grants for economic development. Staff had received inquiries from property owners around 165th Street and Highway 61 on how/when the properties will be served by City sewer and water. There are complexities with serving the properties. Staff recommended applying for a pre -development grant to evaluate a number of key elements to facilitate the development of this area. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved RESOLUTION 2018-16 AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF AN APPLICATION FOR FUNDING FROM THE WASHINGTON COUNTY CDA PREDEVELOPMENT FINANCE FUND. Approve Rachel Juba as the New City Community Development Director Rachel Juba was employed as a Community Development Intern from February, 2006, to January, 2007, Associate Planner from January, 2007, to March, 2010, and as a Planner from March, 2010, to present. City Administrator Bryan Bear recommended Rachel be promoted to fill the vacant Community Development Director position at paygrade 10, step 2. Weidt removed this from the Consent Agenda to talk about the work of Rachel and congratulate her on the promotion. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 21, 2018 Page 5 of 7 Weidt made motion, Petryk seconded, to approve Rachel Juba to be promoted to fill the vacant Community Development Director position. All Ayes. Motion carried. Update on the White Bear Lake Lawsuit City Administrator Bryan Bear talked about the status of the District Court case involving the White Bear Lake water level. Within the last two weeks, the DNR officially appealed the action of the court. The DNR will now ask for a stay in the enforcement of the court proceedings. Bear informed Council the City is still waiting for the hearings to be scheduled on the City's appeal of the four conditions the DNR placed on the City appropriations permits as a result of the judge's order. In the meantime, the permit conditions do not need to be complied with until the appeals have been exhausted. Bear provided an update on the recently passed legislation that will cause a delay in the enforcement by the DNR of any court order provisions, which has now become law effective June Pt. Bear referred back to the DNR's appeal of the district court case stating there was a window of time for the City to provide input into the proceedings as an amicus parry. City Attorney Dave Snyder questioned whether the City wished to ask for limited participation by petitioning for amicus status (friend of the court). If amicus status is granted, the City could file a brief offering its particular views and arguments to support the notion that the court ruling was in error. The arguments would focus on Hugo's efforts in water conservations, how enforcement of the order is counter -productive, emphasize the state statutory priority of managing water use for drinking over recreational use, and rebuff claims that cities have not been mindful of water use. Snyder anticipated other cities would be filing for amicus status, which is indicative of the widespread impact of the ruling. Haas felt it was in the best interest of the City to have its arguments and opinions before the appeals court. Miron agreed with Haas to let it be known what the impact this ruling has on cities and to further help the court understand the fundamental flaw in shifting priorities without vetting or debating the decision. Miron stated the court needed to know of the willingness of cities to continue their conservation efforts and to understand the ruling may not lead to the results they were looking for. Petryk agreed and stated Hugo has been a leader in water reuse and conservation and has already met some of these goals, but Hugo is pushing for scientific answers. She talked about aquifer recharge, which may be a bigger problem that has not been discussed. She was in favor of filing for an amicus brief because all the information needed to be out there. Miron referenced the Star Tribune article Bryan Bear was quoted in about how it was not a simple irrigation issue but an economic development issue, and this was an important thing to point out. Weidt talked about how the City has stayed out of the lawsuit and has worked to limit the amount of ground water used by using stormwater to irrigate, encouraging low water use in the homes by providing rebates, and educating the public on water conservation behavior. It was time for the City to tell its side of the story, and this was an opportunity. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 21, 2018 Page 6 of 7 Weidt made motion, Klein seconded, to direct staff to move forward with filing for amicus status. All Ayes. Motion carried. Update on Lions Park At their meeting of May 16, 2018, the Parks Commission discussed the current status of the playground at Lions Park. Parks Planner Shayla Denaway talked about the complaints the City had received regarding the condition of the play equipment. Upon recent inspection of the playground, a few safety issues needed to be addressed including removal of a cracked slide and replacement of wooden foot boards. The equipment had been installed in 1998 by volunteers at a cost of approximately $44,000. Immediate hazards have been removed, but it was estimated that the primarily wooden playground equipment had less than a year of safe use left without substantial repairs. The Parks Commission had discussed the frequent use of the playground, the small scale of the current equipment, and having an aggressive timeline to address the issues. The Commission talked about holding a neighborhood meeting in June and installing the equipment in August -September. They also noted that upon redevelopment of Lions Park, the playground equipment could be relocated. The Parks Commission made a recommendation to the City Council to allocate up to $100,000 for replacement of the playground at Lions Park. Weidt made motion, Klein seconded, to replace the equipment at Lions Park to not exceed $100,000. Haas suggested the Commission check with WSB Engineers to see they knew of any situation where there was equipment that was being displaced. This could save money and move up the install date. Bear said that, if motion is passed, the City could use park dedication funds specifically allocated for this purpose. All Ayes. Motion carried. Update on the Yellow Ribbon Network Council Member Chuck Haas and Phil Klein reported on the Yellow Ribbon Network activities held recently. Wednesday's Hamburger Night will be sponsored by Mike Devine from Devine's plumbing. A lot of care package requests are coming in for deployed soldiers. The YRN recently sent a shipment of coffee to an Airforce KC 10 refueling crew. They also received a coffee donation from Caribou to be sent to medivac pilots. The 148th Fighter Wing of the MN National Guard is deployed to an undisclosed location, and the Hugo Fire Department and area firefighter special teams sent wish list items to them. YRN volunteers helped with a yard work project for a member of the 148th Fighter Wing. Washington County Veteran Service Office and MN Disabled Veterans will be at Burger Night to provide information to anyone who wants to be a van driver to drive to medical appointments. A request was received from a soldier injured in a car accident, and local volunteers donated $2,000 for medical bills and transportation costs. There was a request for financial assistance to deal with mold in a home and a request from the MN Veteran Assistance Council to support a golf outing. A Youth Hunt was scheduled for September 29, Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 21, 2018 Page 7 of 7 2018, and in additional to the regular hunt sponsors, Haas thanked Washington County and Chisago County Pheasants Forever. Representatives met with the Department of Defense Teams to review best practices for building healthy communities. The YRN will be on MN Military Radio Hour on Twin Cities news talk radio AM1130 on Sunday at 7. The YRN has volunteered to help in the Lions kitchen during Good Neighbor Days. Gravel Roads Workshop on Tuesday, May 22, 2018 City Administrator Bryan Bear reminded Council the workshop to discuss the gravel roads was scheduled for May 22"d. He requested the Council reschedule it to Monday, June 18, 2018, at 7 p.m. Haas made motion, Petryk seconded, to reschedule the workshop to Monday June 18, 2018, at 7 p.m. All Ayes. Motion carried. Adjournment Klein made motion, Haas seconded, to adjourn at 8:09 p.m. All Ayes. Motion carried. Respectfully Submitted, Michele Lindau City Clerk City of Hugo Claims June 4. 2018 G. 1 Vendor Invoice Amount Description Department Allstream 15345028 $ 92.38 Fax Lines Administration Al's Coffee Company 164007 $ 80,70 Breakroom Supplies Gen Gov't Bldgs Ancom Communications 78399 $ 3,660.00 Pagers & Service Plans Fire Dept Ancom Communications 78262 $ 1,352.29 Pager Batteries & Chargers Fire Dept Aspen Mills 210645 $ 253.20 Class A Uniform Coat Fire Dept Batteries Plus Bulbs P884117-01 $ 82.00 Batteries for Handhelds Water Utility Christianson, Paul CLAIM $ 1,447.24 Tuition Reimbursement Building Inspections City of Roseville 224570 $ 420.85 May Phone Service Various City of Roseville 224546 $ 5,113.00 May Computer Service Various Companion Animal Control LLC April $ 788.85 Callout Fees & Mileage Animal Control Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Inc 100212 $ 74.07 Parts - Unit #T11 Fire Dept Face Painting By Linda 300 $ 300.00 Tour de Hugo - Face Painting Parks Dept Goodin Company 02274075-00 $ 17.50 Hardware Water Utility Goodin Company 02273687-00 $ 15.48 Hardware Water Utility Graphic Resources 61864 $ 487.90 Utility Bill Mailing Water & Sewer Green Value Nursery 63054 $ 100.00 Raingarden Supplies Gen Gov't Bldgs Hedberg Supply 136512 $ 413.20 Raingarden Supplies Gen Gov't Bldgs Home Depot Credit Services 8796528 $ 209.70 E-Z Reacher Grabbers Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 131080 $ 194.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Lions Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 131081 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Oakshore Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 131082 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Oneka Lake Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 131083 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Beaver Ponds Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 131084 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Diamond Point Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 131085 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Frog Hollow Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 131086 $ 508.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Hanifl Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 131087 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Valjean Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 131088 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Arbre Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 131089 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Heritage Ponds Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 131090 $ 67.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Compost Site Recycling Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 131091 $ 127.00 Portable Toilet Rental - McCollar Park Parks Dept Jimmy's Johnnys Inc 131092 $ 67.00 Portable Toilet Rental - Irish Avenue Park Parks Dept Laughlin's Pest Control 18888 $ 85.00 May Pest Control Service (CH) Gen Gov't Bldgs Lawson Products 9305842073 $ 842.24 Bulk Hardware Supplies Public Works Lawson Products 9305842074 $ 618.73 Bulk Hardware Supplies Public Works Menards 81879 $ 83.40 Fire Department Supplies Fire Dept Menards 81937 $ 30.64 Mailbox Repairs Street Dept Menards 82611 $ 20.95 Plywood - Hopkins School House Gen Gov't Bldgs Metering & Technology Solutions 11661 $ 3,513.89 Water Meters & Hardware Water Utility Metering & Technology Solutions 11662 $ 1,583.89 Water Meters & Hardware Water Utility Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0618P02 $ 605.00 May Cleaning Service Gen Gov't Bldgs Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc (Minnesota 0618P03 $ 500.00 May Cleaning Service Public Works Cleaning Services Inc 0618P03 $ 225.00 May Cleaning Service Fire Dept Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0618PO4 $ 100.00 May Cleaning Service - Hanifl Parks Dept MN City/County Management Assoc Dues $ 169.00 MCMA Membership Dues - Bryan Bear Administration Motorola Solutions Inc 13211766 $ 4,074.50 800mhz Radio & Accessories - Unit #CV3 Fire Dept Postmaster 21 $ 450.00 Bulk Mailing Permits Annual Renewal Administration Rabouin Inc CLAIM $ 3,000.00 2019 Assessment - Partial Billing #5 Assessor Rapid Press Printing & Copy Center Inc 51332 $ 386.50 Historical Commission Signs Historical Commission Schifsky (T.A.) & Sons Inc 62774 $ 208.00 Asphalt Street Dept Schifsky (T.A) & Sons Inc 62814 $ 232.44 Asphalt Street Dept Schroeder Process Automation LLC 1247 $ 2,084.71 Tech Labor & Parts - Wells & Towers Water Utility Smith. Tom CLAIM $ 19.27 Cell Phone Accessories Water & Sewer Springsted Incorporated 002083.999 - 7 $ 3,100.00 Arbitrage Calculations Finance Dept Sun Life Financial June $ 541.22 Disability Premium Finance Deft T-Mobile 870254054 $ 65.27 Cellular Phone Charges Administration T-Mobile 870254054 $ 1,419.11 Cellular Phone Charges Various Twin City Garage Door Co 506291 $ 390.00 Test Fire Shutters Gen Govt Bldgs Verizon Wireless 9806618288 $ 677.31 Cellular Phone Charges Fire Dept Verizon Wireless 9806618288 $ 409.99 [Pad - Unit #CV3 Fire Dept Washington County 140445 $ 220.00 TIF District Annual Administrative Fee TIF Funds Weigel Signs, Bill 18-260 $ 55.00 Nameplates Community Development Weigel Signs, Bill 18-260 $ 33.00 Nameplate Finance Dent Total Claims for June 4, 2018 $ 42,631.42 Page 1 G,S ° AIX Document G702"m —1992 Application and Certificate for Payment TO OWNER: "lly Y1 ^'la° PROJECT: 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo FireStation 6323140th Street North APPLICATION NO: 1 Distribution to: Hugo MN 55038 Hugo MN 66038 PERIOD TO: OS/25/2018 OWNER ❑ CONTRACT FOR: ARCHITECT ❑ FROM CONTRACTOR: Diverse Construction ServiceWAAACHITECT: ROWSpec, inc. Remit payments to: 2400 Prior Avenue North CONTRACT DATE: CONTRACTOR ❑ 82 - 38th Avenue NE St Paul MN 55113 PROJECT NOS: / / FIELD ❑ Columbia Heights MN 55421-3502 OTHER ❑ CONTRACTOR'S APPLICATION FOR PAYMENT The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of the Contractor's knowledge, infomlation Application is made for payment, asshown'below, in connection will, the Counacl. and belief the Work covered by this Application for Payment has been completed in accordance AIA Document 0703Tar, Continuation Sheet, is attached. with the Contract Documents, that all amounts have been paid by the Contractor for Work for 168,137.00 which previous Certificates for Payment were issued and payments received from the Owner, and 1.ORIGINAL CONTRACT SUM ................................................ $ $D0 that current payment shown herein is now due. 2. NET CHANGE BY CHANGE ORDERS .............................. $ CDNTRAC 3. CONTRACT SUM TO DATE (Line l t 2)................................ $ Qe 1 000 By- Date: Q 48 4. TOTAL COMPLETED S STORED TO DATE (Cohrmn C on G70/) ...... $ State 5. RETAI"qE: County of:)Y-pj­e,_ a. % of Completed Work 3,348.44 4o- d and sworn t etbre �n (Gy.6pnns D + E ort 6703) $ 2G"�day of r b• _%ofStoredMaterial 0.00 "Mum", (Cohaun F on G703) $ i c.ri-) NOWKI M-NSA3,348,44i expires: //a �, E 00bW Total Retainage (Circe Sn + sb. or Total in Cohunn 1 of G703)...... $ 6. TOTAL EARNED LESS RETAINAGE.................................... $ 6 CHITECT'S CERTIFICATE FOR PAYMENT (Lire 4 minas Line 5 Total) 0.00 In accordance with the Contract Documents, based on on -site observations and the data comprising 7. LESS PREVIOUS CERTIFICATES FOR PAYMENT ...................... this application, the Architect certifies to the Owner that to the best of the Architect's knowledge, $ information and belief the Work has progressed as indicated, the quality of the Work is in (Line 6frorn prior Certificate) accordance with the Contract Documents, and the Contractor is ent the 63,6201? ............... 6. CURRENT PAYMENT DUE ................... ......... $ AMOUNT CERTIFIED. . 9. BALANCE TO FINISH, INCLUDING RETAINAGE 104,516.74 AMOUNT CERTIFIED .................................................... 63,620.26 (Line 3 minus Line 6) $ (Arroch eaplariation ffamomrt ceriified differs from the amount t ' Application and on the Continuation Sheer /ba( are changed to conform with the amount certifier..) HANGE ORDER SUMMARY ADDITIONS I DEDUCTIONS I ARCHITECT: �7 Total changes approved in previous months by Owner $ $ By. Dare: 5-29-2018 Total approved this month $ Is This Certificate is not negotiable. The AMOUNT CERTIFIED is payable only to the Contractor TOTAL Js named herein. Issuance, payment and acceptance of payment are without prejudice to any rights of ET CHANGES b a Chan a Order $ the Owner or Contractor under this Contract CAUTION: You uhould slgr an original AIA Contract Document. On witch this teat appears In REO An original assures that caanges will not be obscurest. AIA Document G702- - 1992, Copyright 01953, 1963, 1965. 1971. 1973, 1983 and 1992 by The American Institule of Architects. All rights reserved. WARNW6; This AIA° Doounrnf is proaAeied by U.9 Copyright Law and tntematonel Tmates. Umuthonzed reproduction of distribu6nn of this AIA. Document. Or any portion of It may result In severe chill and crkninal penallfes. and will be proseelead to the mattinum extent possible uruler the taw. Purchasers are permitted to reproduce ten (10) copies or this document when completed. To report copyright violations of AIA Contract Documents, e-mail The American Institute of Architects' legal counsel, copyright@ais.org. Document G703" -1952 Continuation Sheet AIA Document G702Tm-1992, Application and Certificate for Payment, or G732TM -2009, Application and Certificate for Payment, Construction Manager as Adviser Edition, containing Contractor's signed certification is attacbed. In tabulations below; amounts are in US dollars. Use Column I on'Contracts where variable retainage for line items may apply. APPLICATION NO: 1 APPLICATION DATE: 05/24/2018 PERIOD T0: 05/25/2018 ARCHITECT'S PROJECT NO: A 13 C D E F I G H 1 WORK COMPLETED ITEM NO DESCRIPTION OF WORK SCHEDULED MATERIALS PRESENTLY TOTAL COMPLEMDAND % BALANCETO FINISH RETAINAGE PROM PREVIOUS VALUE APPLICATION THIS PERIOD STORED STOREDTODATE ( (:+C) (C-G) (lfrrmlabkrate) quipment (D+@) (curing 8) (EDTO E 3,500.00 6,000.00 600.0D 100.00 300.00 oling Materials 67,743.00 60,968.70 60,968.70 90.00 3,500.00 6,774.30 3,048.44 R sting Labor 43.644.00 43,644.00 S eet Metal Materials 3,900.00 1 3,900.00 S eet Metal Labor 6,DD0.00 6,0010.0D S ibcontractor 36.100.00 ! 36,100.00 arraMy 1,250.D0 1,250.00 Totals: 168,13T.00 66,968.70 66,968.70 39.83 101,168.30 3,348.44 GRAND TOTAL Stan : ^ofl"ct Dotumeny on *hich IMS text appears on RED An orion.&I assures that c` cured. !IA Document G703- -1992. Copyright 0 1963, 1965, 1966. 1967, 1970, 1978, 1983 end 1992 by The American Instilule or Architects. All rfghts reserved. " -' - `' :�.r =m Is,promotal 6y U.S. Copyrigh5 ... � � � ". -:due0or, or dishibution of this MA Document or any poM n of it, may result in saver* ctv8 +. .... ..vaccalod to the ma>ttinum en ant Purchasers are. permitted to reproduce ten (10) copies of this document vfien completed. To report copyright violations of AIA Contract Documents, e-mail The American Institute of Architects' legal counsel copyright@aia.org. .amo.coa A WSB Memorandum G.7 178 East 9" Street, Suite 200 1 St. Paul, MN 55101 1 (651) 286-8450 To: Tom Weidt, Mayor, City of Hugo Hugo City Council CC: Rachel Juba, Planner, City of Hugo Rachel Leitz, Community Development Assistant, City of Hugo Mark Erichson, City Engineer, WSB From: Tony Havranek, Senior Ecologist, WSB Date: May 30, 2018 Re: City Project No. 17.16 WSB Project No. 011371-00 Len Pratt (CPDC Pratt Oakwood Ltd.) is proposing to develop the 120-acre parcel formerly known as the LeRoux Parcel to include 176 single family homes. The development will be named Oneka Place. To accommodate this development, Mr. Pratt is proposing to impact 0.91 acres of wetland. Impacts are to eight (8) separate basins on the property. The remaining wetland on the property is not proposed to be impacted and the eastern 40 acres of the parcel, which contains a significant number of wetlands, is being dedicated to the City. Mr. Pratt is proposing to replace the 0.91 acres of impact to these wetland basins through the purchase of 1.82 acres of wetland credit from an existing and approved wetland bank in Hennepin County. Based on my review of the application and supporting documentation, the requirements under the MN Wetland Conservation Act have been met. The Notice of Decision and supporting documentation are attached to this memo. recommend approval of the Oneka Place Joint Application for sequencing flexibility, sequencing, and wetland replacement. If additional information is required I can be contacted at (612)246-9346 or thavranek(cDwsbeng.com. Attachments: Notice of Decision for Oneka Place Joint Application Building a legacy — your legacy. Equal Opportunity Employer I wsbeng.com K:\011371-000VAdmin\Permits\17.16 Leroux Delin\replacement\Memorandum_HugoCityCouncil_OnekaPLace_053018.docx Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit (LOU) Address City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N., Hugo, MN 55038 1. PROJECT INFORMATION Applicant Name Len Pratt, CPDC Project Name. Oneka Place Date of Application 2/6/18-Initial Application Application Number Pratt Oakwood Ltd. PID 0703121340003 5/2/18-Complete 17.16 Ken Meek, Earth 0703121430002 011371-00 Science Associates Inc. 1 010997-00 ® Attach site locator map. Type of Decision: ❑ Wetland Boundary or Type ❑ No -Loss ❑ Exemption ® Sequencing ® Replacement Plan ❑ Banking Plan l ectlmcal >valuation Yanel r inclm2s and Kecommendation (it ® Approve ❑ Approve with conditions ❑ Deny Summary (or attach)_ TEP members from Washington Conservation District (WCD) and BWSR verbally approved the sequencing and sequencing flexibility portion of the application at the April 23, 2018 TEP meeting. The applicant was informed that the wrong BSA was identified (BSA 6) in the application and was asked to check availability of credits in major watershed 20 or BSA 7. 2. LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT DECISION Date of Decision: May 30, 2018 ❑ Approved ® Approved with conditions (include below) ❑ Denied LGU Findings and Conclusions (attach additional sheets as necessary): BwsR Forms 11-25-09 Page 1 of 6 Ken Meek (Earth Science Associates, Inc.) submitted a MN Joint Application on behalf of Len Pratt (CPDC Pratt Oakwood Ltd.) on April 27, 2018 requesting sequencing, sequencing flexibility, and wetland replacement for the Oneka Place Development; formerly Leroux Site. The application was considered complete on May 2, 2018. The applicant is proposing to develop 176 single family homes on the 120 acre parcel. A wetland boundary and type application was approved for the property on Januray 29, 2018. The approved wetland delineation report identified 26 wetland basins on the property. The most common type of wetland was type 2, but wetland types 1, 3, 5, and 7 were also identified in the report. Two separate groundwater investigations were completed to better understand the hydrology of the site and determine potential impacts to wetland hydrology from site devlopment. The first report titled "Geotechnical Evaluation Report, Leroux Property, Oneka Parkway and Ethan Trail, Hugo, MN" and dated May 16, 2017, reported findings from the installation of 16 borings throughout the parcel with most of the borings concentrating on the western 2/3 of the parcel. The results of this report indicate water elevations 0.1 to 4.9' below the ground surface with most of the 12 borings that were used in the report indicating observed water within 1' of the ground surface. One station showed "no water encountered". This report indicated that this was a perched layer of water and that the static water level was below this layer. The second report titled "Groundwater Investigation Report, Oneka Place, Hugo, MN 55038" and dated March 2018, reported findings from a separate study that utilized nine (9) observation wells to determine the static groundwater level. These wells were 24 to 35' deep. Results indicate that the static groundwater elevation ranged from 5.55 to 20.03' below grade, with an average of 13.25' below grade. Average groundwater elevation was 911.73'. Wetland bottom elevations range from 912 to 925.5' with an average bottom elevation of 918.57'. Based on these reports it appears wetland hydrology is driven by lateral movement of the perched groundwater and surface runoff within the individual contributing drainage areas (CDA), with minimal to no interaction between wetland hydrology and groundwater. Wetland to groundwater hydrology may be limited to acquifer recharge from downward flow of water from wetland basins to the acquifer. To further evalutae impacts to wetland basins from surface drainage alteration from development, a review of CDA volumes and rates were completed using P8 modeling. This analysis showed that existing surface hydrology to wetlands would be maintinaed with proposed development in both the 2 year and 100 year storm events. The applicant is proposing to permanantly impact eight (8) wetland basins from a combination of excavation and fill activities. These impacts total 0.91 acres. Sequencing Flexibility The applicant has requested sequencing flexibility for impacts to seven (7) of the wetland basins proposed to be impacted. This request is based on a MnRAM Functional Assessment of all wetland basins proposed to be impacted. Results of the analysis showed that 7 of the 8 wetland basins are classified as manage 3; with most wetland functions described as low. Wetland L was classified as a Preserve and it is not included in the request for sequencing flexibility. The 7 wetland basins for which sequencing flexibility is being requested (basins B, BB, D, E, F, I, and P) mainly consist of reed canary grass and meet the requirements described under MN Rule 8420.0520 subp. 7a. BWSR Forms 11-25-09 Page 2 of 6 Sequencing MN Rule 8420.0520 lists specific sequencing requirements. As part of the applicant's sequencing process ten (10) alternatives were considered as part of project planning. Five (5) of these alternatives resulted in no wetland impacts to the site. The first was the no -build option. This alternative was rejected since its does not meet the project purpose and does not meet the physical, economic, or demographic requirements of the project. Alternatives 2-5 involved an alternative location search. Four (4) alternate locations were considered for development to meet the project purpose. The search criteria included inclusion in the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA), existing access road connections, a large (-80-acre footprint), minimal wetlands, and be located within Hugo. Alternative sites 1-4 were rejected since they did not meet the search criteria or resulted in increased wetland impacts. Minimization efforts involved five (5) alternative site designs. Alterations of the site included moving roadways, removing and reconfiguring lots, and adding retaining walls. Impacts were reduced from 2.86 acres to 0.91 with the current design. Wetland Replacement The applicant's proposed alternative to develop the site will result in 0.91 acres of permanent impact to eight (8) type 2 wetlands. These basins include wetlands B, BB, D, E, F, I, L, and P. MN Rule 8420.0522 requires that wetland impacts be replaced at a 2.5:1 ratio. The applicant has requested the ratio be reduced by 0.5:1 since replacement for the impacted wetlands will be withdrawn from an approved wetland bank site within the same major watershed (#20-Mississippi River -Twin Cities). The resulting replacement ratio is 2:1. The applicant is proposing to purchase 1.82 acres of type 3 and 4 wetland credit from wetland bank #1649. BWSR siting requirements for wetland replacement require applicants follow the priority order of using credits within in the same minor watershed, the same major watershed, the same bank service area (BSA), and in another BSA. There are no approved wetland credits within the Hardwood Creek minor watershed, therefore the applicant is proposing to use credits from wetland bank 1649 which is in the same major watershed (#20-Mississippi River -Twin Cities). The application includes a purchase agreement for 1.82 acres of wetland credits from wetland bank 1649. Special Considerations The applicant has addressed MN Rule 8420.0515 subps. 1-10. The development and resulting wetland impacts will not have an adverse impact on rare natural communities, endangered or threatened species, archeological sites, groundwater, sensitive surface waters, nor does the site support educational or research uses, or contain a waste disposal site and is consistent with other plans. BwsR Forms 11-25-09 Page 3 of 6 Approval and Conditions Based on the information provided in the Joint Wetland Permit Application prepared by Ken Meek, Earth Science Associates, Inc., and dated March 2018, and the addendum dated April 2018, as well as supporting does submitted after the addendum, the application for sequencing flexibility, sequencing, and wetland replacement is approved with the following conditions: 1.) No wetland impacts will occur until the applicant has provided confirmation from BWSR that 1.82 acres of wetland credit has been withdrawn from wetland bank account 1649 to replace the 0.91 acres of proposed wetland impact. 2.) No additional impacts will occur to wetlands (temporary or permanent) within the project area beyond the proposed 0.91 acres. 3.) The applicant will monitor wetland hydrology for wetland basins, A, B, C, D, E, G, and J and submit a written report detailing the hydrology (inundation or saturation) for the basins and how observed hydrology compares to that of existing hydrology for a period of three years following the year after construction is complete. A reduction in hydrology may be considered an impact and require replacement under MN Rule 8420.0111 subp. 34. Bank Account # Bank Service Area County Credits Approved for Withdrawal 1649 7 Hennepin (sq. ft. or nearest .01 acre) 1.82 Replacement Plan Approval Conditions. In addition to any conditions specified by the LGU, the approval of a Wetland Replacement Plan is conditional upon the following: ❑ Financial Assurance: For project -specific replacement that is not in -advance, a financial assurance specified by the LGU must be submitted to the LGU in accordance with MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 (List amount and type in LGU Findings). ❑ Deed Recording: For project -specific replacement, evidence must be provided to the LGU that the BWSR "Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants" and "Consent to Replacement Wetland" forms have been filed with the county recorder's office in which the replacement wetland is located. BWSR Forms 11-25-09 Page 4 of 6 ® Credit Withdrawal: For replacement consisting ofwetland bank credits, confirmation that BWSR has withdrawn the credits from the state wetland bank as specified in the approved replacement plan. Wetlands may not be impacted until all applicable conditions have been met! LGU Authorized Signature: Signing and mailing of this completed form to the appropriate recipients in accordance with 8420.0255, Subp. 5 provides notice that a decision was made by the LGU under the Wetland Conservation Act as specified above. If additional details on the decision exist, they have been provided to the landowner and are available from the LGU u on request. Name: Title: Tony Havranek Senior Ecologist (WSB & Associates, Inc.), on behalf of the City of Hugo Signature Date: Phone Number and E-mail: May 30, 2018 (612)246-9346, tavranek@wsbeng.com THIS DECISION ONLY APPLIES TO THE MINNESOTA WETLAND CONSERVATION ACT. Additional approvals or permits from local, state, and federal agencies may be required. Check with all appropriate authorities before commencing work in or near wetlands. Applicants proceed at their own risk if work authorized by this decision is started before the time period for appeal (30 days) has expired. If this decision is reversed or revised under appeal, the applicant may be responsible for restoring or replacing all wetland impacts. This decision is valid for three years from the date of decision unless a longer period is advised by the TEP and specified in this notice of decision. 3. APPEAL OF THIS DECISION Pursuant to MN Rule 8420.0905, any appeal of this decision can only be commenced by mailing a petition for appeal, including applicable fee, within thirty (30) calendar days of the date of the mailing of this Notice to the following as indicated: Check one: ❑ Appeal of an LGU staff decision. Send petition ® Appeal of LGU governing body decision. Send and $ fee (if applicable) to: petition and $500 filing fee to: Executive Director Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 4. LIST OF ADDRESSEES N SWCD TEP member: Jay Riggs, Washington Conservation District, 455 Hayward Avenue North, Oakdale, MN 55128 jriags&mnwcd.org ® BWSR TEP member: Ben Meyer, Board of Water & Soil Resources, 520 Lafayette Road N., St. Paul, MN 55155, ben.meyer(kstate.mn.us ® LGU TEP member (if different than LGU Contact): Rachel Juba, City of Hugo, rjuba(kci.hugo.mn.us Rachel Leitz, City of Hugo, rleitz(kci.hugo.mn.us, Scott Anderson, City of Hugo, sandersonkci.hugo.mn.us ® DNR TEP member: Becky Horton, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 becky.hortonkstate.mn.us Jenifer Sorensen, MN DNR, DNR Regional Office (if different than DNR TEP member BWSR Forms 11-25-09 Page 5 of 6 ® WD or WMO (if applicable): Nick Tomczik, Rice Creek Watershed District, 4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive, Suite 611, Blaine, MN 55449-4539 ntomczikkricecreek.org ® Applicant (notice only) and Landowner (if different): Len Pratt, CPDC Pratt Oakwood Ltd., lenpratt&pratthomes.com roxannegpratthomes.com Ken Meek- Earth Science Associates, esa332&gmail.com ❑ Members of the public who requested notice: Stephanie Hatten, WSB, shattenkwsbeng com ® Corps of Engineers Project Manager (notice only): Thomas Hingsberger, US Army Corps of Engineers, thomas j.hingsbergergusace.army.mil, Sean Kelly, US Army Corps of Engineers, I " BWSR Wetland Bank Coordinator (wetland bank plan applications only): 5. MAILING INFORMATION ➢For a list of BWSR TEP representatives, see: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/aboutbwsr/workareas/WCA areas.pdf ➢ For a list of DNR TEP representatives, see: www.bwsr.state.mn.us/wetlands/wca/DNR_TEP contacts.pdf ➢ Department of Natural Resources Regional Offices: NW Region: NE Region: Central Region: Southern Region: Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Reg. Env. Assess. Ecol. Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources Div. Ecol. Resources 2115 Birchmont Beach Rd. NE 1201 E. Hwy. 2 1200 Warner Road 261 Hwy. 15 South Bemidji, MN 56601 Grand Rapids, MN 55744 St. Paul, MN 55106 New Ulm, MN 56073 For a map of DNR Administrative Regions, see: hgp:Hfiles.dnr.state.mn.us/aboutdnr/dnr_reaions.pdf ➢ For a list of Corps of Project Managers, see: www.Mvp.usace.army.mil/regulatory/default.asp?pageid=687 or send to: Dept. of the Army, Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District ATTN: CO-R, 190 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1638 ➢ For Wetland Bank Plan applications, also send a copy of the application to: Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Wetland Bank Coordinator 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 6. ATTACHMENTS In addition to the site locator map, list any other attachments: ® Joint Wetland Permit Application, Revision 1.2 Dated April 2018 ® Wetland Analysis Table ® Draft Purchase Agreement from Wetland Bank 1649 ® Copy of City of Hugo City Council meeting minutes June 4, 2018) BWSR Forms 11-25-09 Page 6 of 6 Wetland Replacement Plan Oneka Place Hugo, Minnesota 55038 45.183* N., 93.010* W. Section 7, T.31 N., R.21 W. Washington County, Minnesota Prepared on Behalf of.- Leonard W. Pratt, President CPDC-Pratt-Oakwood LLC 33500 Willow Lake Boulevard, Suite 100 Vadnais Heights, Minnesota 55110 Prepared by: Earth Science Associates, Inc. 37445 Grand Avenue North Branch, Minnesota 55056 ESA Project #122-17 REVISION 1.2 April 2018 REVISION 1.2 This revised application incorporates the project evolution and additional information requested since the March 2018 submittal of the initial application. The initial application presented four (4) project alternatives and proposed on -site wetland mitigation. The Addendum, submitted March 30, 2018, addressed preliminary Army Corps of Engineers comment. The March 30th addendum included off -site alternative analysis of four (4) alternate locations. An additional fifth (5th) project alternative, dated 3/29/18, was presented which reduced wetland impact from 1.07 to 0.91 acres. The additional avoidance and minimization was accomplished by eliminating one lot (Lot 10 of Block 1 was eliminated) and the use of a retaining wall, rather than a side slope, below the cul-de-sac above wetland P in the southeast part of the development. Additional impact reduction was not feasible from engineering and safety standpoints. As explained in the addendum, wetland BB could not be avoided since the existing elevation of BB is higher than adjacent Street 1 and stormwater Pond 8. Therefore, the hydrology to BB, which is surface water dependent, would be cut-off by the development of the surrounding land. The elevation of Pond 8 is dictated by run-on drainage from the south and the elevation of Street 1 is dictated by the elevation of Wetland B. Impact reduction to wetland L, in the back yard of Lot 12 along the east side of Street 3, could be achieved by installing a retaining wall at that location. This option is not feasible from a safety perspective since a retaining wall in a back yard would present a hazard to small children playing there, or to residents otherwise using this outdoor living space. At the conclusion of the April 23 d TEP meeting it was determined that a revised Wetland Replacement Plan application, rather than another addendum, should be submitted. The email (April 241h ) listing the additional information needed, as summarized in the April 23 d meeting is attached. In order to relieve the reviewer from the tedium of reviewing documentation previously submitted, additional verbiage in this revised application will betyped in Courier New font. PROJECT OVERVIEW CPDC-Pratt-Oakwood LLC has owned this 117.5 acre parcel consisting of agricultural land, woods, and wetlands since 2003. The western two-thirds consist of cropland on a high ground. The eastern one-third contains a complex of high quality sedge meadow (Type 2) and shallow marsh (Type 3) wetland plant communities. Through the years the owners had considered various options to develop the property. The eastern one-third had been considered for a wetland bank, baseball field, and single family home sites. The western two-thirds had always been considered for single family residential. The City of Hugo, located 15 miles north of the Twin Cities metro area, underwent rapid development from the mid-90' until 2007, when the worst recession the Country had seen for 80 years occurred. Since that time, the housing market has returned. Presently, there is pent-up demand for housing by individuals and families who've had to delay buying a home for the past decade. The site is located in the north side of Hugo, north of the terminus of Oneka Parkway North (See Site Locator Map). The developer plans to construct 176 single-family lots (141 single family and 35 villa homes) in four phases. Oneka Parkway North will be extended to join with 1651h Street North. Current plans for the eastern third of the site call for dedicated to the City of Hugo for preservation and a passive trail system. Wetland replacement would be accomplished at a 2.5:1 ratio using a BWSR/Army Corps approved wetland bank. TABLE OF CONTENTS • Interagency Water Resource Application Form • Attachment C - Avoidance and Minimization • Wetland Sequencing Exhibit • Attachment D — Replacement/Compensatory Mitigation • Site Locator Map • Project Alternatives #1 2005 Yield Study #2 2016 Leroux Concept #3 2-05-18 Preliminary Grading Plan #4 Current Preliminary Grading Plan #5 3-29-18 Wetland Impact Plan (Preferred Alternative) • Alternate Project Location Drawings • NHIS data review memo • Replacement wetland credit documentation, Wetland Bank Service Areas Map Figures • Wetland Delineation Site Diagram • USGS 7.5" Map Regional Review • P8 Water Quality Modeling Discharge Locations • Soils Map • Photos • Wetland Functional Assessment Report Project Name and/or Number: PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf, the agent's contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Leonard W. Pratt, President CPDC Pratt Oakwood Ltd. Mailing Address: 3500 Willow Lake Boulevard, Suite 100 Vadnais Heights, MN 55110 Phone: 651-429-8032 E-mail Address: lenpratt@pratthomes. com,roxanne@pratthomes.com Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Kenneth Meek, PG, CPG Earth Science Associates, Inc. Mailing Address: 37445 Grand Avenue North Branch, 55056 Phone: 612-718-0413 E-mail Address: esa332@gmail.com Dan Seemon 651-724-2454 denad@frontiernet.net PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Washington City/Township: Hugo 55038 Parcel ID and/or Address: 0703121340003, 0703121430002 / xxxx Oneka Parkway Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): Sec. 7, Twp. 31 N., Rng. 21 W. Lat/Long (decimal degrees): 45.183 N., 93.010 W. Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways. Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): 120 ACRES Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 3 of 19 If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names a addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform 4345 2012oct.pdf Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 4 of 19 PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The proje description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. The applicant (CPDC Pratt Oakwood Ltd.) proposes to construct 176 single-family homes on 120 acres of agricultural lard in the City of Hugo, Minnesota. There would be 0.91 acres of unavoidable wetland impact in wetlands discharging in o Hardwood and Clearwater Creeks. These impacts would consist of access roads (infrastructure), retaining walls a d excavation for stormwater ponds. The proposed project (Oneka Place) would be divided into 4 (four) phases. Phase 1 would commence in May of 2018, with no proposed wetland impacts. Additional phases would start as the demand f r housing increases. No firm timeline is anticipated for future phases of the proposed development but 2021 would be an approximate end date. 1.9 units per acre would be constructed (see drawings). Approximately, 30 acres of the 120 acre si e would be deeded to the City of Hugo for recreational activities including walking/biking trail. The need for the project reflects in the demand for single-family housing in the peripheral suburbs of the City of Hugo. The City has water, sewer and a vast net work of city/county roads the connect to 135-E. This makes the commute (approximately 20 miles) to the Twin Cities metropolitan area, a more favorable opportunity for potential home buyers than Anoka or Chisago Counties. The applicant has owned the parcel since 2003 and has waited until the right economic conditions arose to develop the parcel. Phase 1 would be earmarked for retirees with a slab -on -grade construction . Additional phases would consist of homes with basements. Therefore, based on the locally of the development and tf e need/demand for this type of housing, the applicant believes the purpose and need would meet the buyers perspectives. Consistency with other plans(MN R. 8420.05156 Subp.10.)was demonstrated in th April 23rd, 2018, TEP meeting where the City Planner was also present, and th engineer pointed out future street connections from the SW part of the propose project that would avoid wetland impact as Hugo continues to develop. Since on site wetland replacement has been removed from consideration, the conservatio easement previously created within the east part of the site for that purpose wil be modified. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 5 of 19 Project Name and/or Number: PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact' Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact n the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view map, aerial photlI , and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Type of Impact Duration of County, Major Aquatic Existing Plant Aquatic Resource (fill, excavate, Impact Overall Size of Watershed #, Resource Type Community ID (as noted on drain, or Permanent (P) Size of Impact' Aquatic and Bank (wetland, lake, s Type(s) in overhead view) remove or Temporary Resource 4 Service Area # tributary etc.) 1 Impact Area s vegetation) (T) of Impact Area Wetland B wetland fill P 0.01 1.61 Type 2 7 Wetland BB wetland excavate P 0.24 0.24 Type 2 7 Wetland D/E wetland fill P 0.10 1.62 Type 2 7 Wetland F wetland excavate P 0.20 0.20 Type2 7 Wetland I wetland excavate P 0.29 0.29 Type 2 7 Wetland L wetland fill P 0.03 11.34 Type 2 7 Wetland P wetland fill P 1 0.04 1.98 1 Type 2 7 TOTALS: 1 0.91 17.28 IIf impacts are temporary; enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the "T". For example, a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered "T (220)". 2Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example, a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would reported as 50 ft (300 square feet). 3This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp. 8, otherwise enter "N/A". 4Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2. 5Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: 1 The term "impact" as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 6 of 19 PART FIVE: Applicant Signature ❑ Check here if you are requesting a pre -application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have p Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below, I attest that the 7ifonzation in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the a to undertake She-wor c scrib r, im:' Signature: f..'� / Date: I hereby authorize Earth Science Associates, Inc. to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, u request, supplemental information in support of this application. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 7 of 17 Leroux- Oneka Place - Wetland Sequencing Exhibit 3/29/2018 Wetland ID 2017 Delineation 2005 Concept plan LeRoux Concept (2016) 2-5-18 Prel Grading Plan 3-19-18 Prel Grading Plan 3-29-18 Grading Plan Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres Acres A 1.52 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 B 1.61 0.13 0.13 0.10 0.07 0.01 BB 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 0.24 C 0.21 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 D/E 1.62 0.76 0.39 0.16 0.10 0.10 F 0.20 0.19 0.07 0.20 0.20 0.20 G 0.52 0.52 0.19 0.13 0.00 0.00 H 0.03 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 I 0.29 0.04 0.04 0.29 0.29 0.29 J 0.64 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 K,L,M,N,R 11.34 0.22 0.11 0.03 0.03 0.03 O 0.29 0.08 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 P 1.98 0.11 0.36 0.14 0.14 0.04 Q 1.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 S 0.61 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 T 0.25 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 U 0.66 0.16 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.00 V 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 W 1.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 X 0.07 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 Y 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Totals 24.99 2.86 2.03 1.29 1.07 0.91 Project Name and/or Number: Attachment C Avoidance and Minimization Project Purpose, Need, and Requirements. Clearly state the purpose of your project and need for your project. Also include a description of any specific requirements of the project as they relate to project location, project footprint, water management, and any other applicable requirements. Attach an overhead plan sheet showing all relevant features of the project (buildings, roads, etc.), aquati resource features (impact areas noted) and construction details (grading plans, storm water management plans, etc.), referencing these as necessary: The applicant proposes to construct the Oneka Place residential development consisting of approximately '/z acre lots on 120 acres of agricultural land. There would be 17 6 single-family homes. The project would consist of 4 phases. Phase 1 would be slab -on -grade homes for senior retirees. The final 3 phases would be full basement homes. There would be 8 stormwater ponds to control imperious surface runoff as required by the City of Hugo (see grading plans). The need for the residential development comes from the lack of affordable single-family homes in the City of Hugo area. The closeness to the Twin City metropolitan area makes Hugo and idea distance for commuting, while providing the services of a large metropolitan area. Therefore, the applicant is striving to provide affordable housing where there is a demand. Avoidance. Both the CWA and the WCA require that impacts to aquatic resources be avoided if practicable alternatives exist. Clearly describe all on -site measures considered to avoid impacts to aquatic resources and discuss at least two project alternatives that avoid al impacts to aquatic resources on the site. These alternatives may include alternative site plans, alternate sites, and/or not doing the project. Alternatives should be feasible and prudent (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 2 C). Applicants are encouraged to attach drawings and plans to support their analysis: There have been five concepVgrading plans since 2005 (see wetland sequencing exhibit). The wetland delineation was done during the growing season in 2017 and approved in the summer of 2017. As the table shows in 2005 there were proposed impacts of 2.86 acres. In the 3 / 2 9 / 18 proposal that has decreased to 0.91 acres. Instead of affecting 14 wetland areas in 2005, the applicant has decreased that to 7 wetland areas. Half as many wetland areas impacted and decrease of over 1 '/z acres of total wetland impact (see exhibits). The applicant has demonstrated that the least damaging practicable alternative (3 / 2 9 / 18) would be implemented to have the minimal effects on the aquatic resource. The Applicant has exerted further effort to reduce wetland impact (See 3/29/18 Wetland Impact Plan). In this plan, wetland impact is reduced by 6650 square feet, or from 1.07 to 0.91 acres, compared to the 3/19/18 Plan (See attached Wetland Sequencing Exhibit spreadsheet). Impact to wetland B has been reduced from 0.07 to 0.01 acres by eliminating Lot 10, Block 1, along the north side of Street 1. Impact to wetland P has been reduced from 0.14 to 0.04 acres in wetland P, in the southeast part of the development, by use of a retaining wall rather than a side slope below the cul—de—sac. Additional impact reduction is not feasible from engineering and safety standpoints. The existing elevation of wetland BB is higher than adjacent Street 1 and stormwater Pond 8. Therefore, the hydrology to BB, which is surface water dependent, would be cut—off by the development of the surrounding land. The elevation of Pond 8 is dictated by run—on drainage from the south and the elevation of Street 1 is dictated by the elevation of Wetland B. Impact avoidance to wetland L, in the back yard of Lot 12 along the east side of Street 3, could be achieved by installing a retaining wall at that Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 10 of 19 location. This option is not feasible from a safety perspective since a retaining wall in a back yard would present a hazard to small children playing there, or to residents otherwise using this outdoor living space. Zero Impact Alternatives. As required under MN Rule 8420 Subp.3.C.(1), two alternatives are considered that avoid all wetland impacts to this site. 1. No -Build: In this alternative the area presently under cultivation would remain. The wetlands areas which receive sediment and fertilizer run-off would remain in their degraded state. The need for affordable single family housing in close proximity to the metro area would remain un-met. Therefore, the no -build alternative is rejected. 2. Alternate Locations: All wetland impacts to this site could be avoided by completing the project at an alternate location. The proposed project covers approximately 120 acres with 80 contiguous acres impacting 1 acre of wetland. The remaining 40 acres is native parkland. The proposed project falls within the 2020 MUSA line so that city water and sewer can be provided. Attached, please find two figures, one is the 2020 Hugo MUSA line and the other is the same overlain on the Fish & Wildlife National Wetland Inventory Map (NWI). These maps present the same 120-acre footprint in different locations. The NWI overlay is presented to provide an estimate of the possible wetland impact the proposed project would have in alternate locations. Alternate locations 1 through 3 are inside the MUSA at undeveloped locations. These locations would cause 30 to 70 acres of wetland impact and would not be feasible from either an economic or environmental perspective. A forth location is indicated a short distance east of the MUSA. While alternate location 4 may be suitable, due to its proximity to a road, this site would not serve the project purpose because the development would need individual wells and septic systems. Also, 25 acres of wetland impact would occur at alternate location 4. Therefore, the applicant has rejected all off -site alternatives and proposed to develop the site they have owned since 2003, primarily because it offers City services. Minimization. Both the CWA and the WCA require that all unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources be minimized to the greatest extent practicable. Discuss all features of the proposed project that have been modified to minimize the impacts to water resources (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 4): As mentioned above, the applicant has avoided and minimized wetland impacts where practicable. As depicted in the exhibits and wetland sequencing, wetland impacts in B, D/E and P have been minimized. Wetlands A,C,G,H,J,O,S,U, and X have been eliminated from impact. The applicant requests Sequencing Flexibility (MN R. 8420.0520 Subp. 7a.) The applicant requests sequencing flexibility for all wetland impacts with the exception of wetland L. As indicated in the attached MnRAM analysis report, impacted wetlands B. BB,D/E and I are degraded to the point where replacement would result in certain gain in function and public value. It should also be noted that the applicant would dedicate the eastern one- third of the site, which contains wetland classified as Preserve by MnRAM, to the City for use as their natural park and trail system. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 11 of 19 Sequencing Flexibility for wetland L is not requested. Wetland L, is classified as Preserve in the MnRAM Management Classification Report, and Moderate to High in the Wetland Functional Assessment Summary. As stated in the Avoidance section, impact avoidance to wetland L, in the back yard of Lot 12, Block 11, along the east side of Street 3, could be achieved by installing a retaining wall at that location. This option is not feasible from a safety perspective since a retaining wall in a back yard would present a hazard to small children playing there, or to residents otherwise using this outdoor living space. Therefore, the applicant has demonstrated avoidance and minimization for wetland L, but it would not be eligible for sequencing flexibility since L is a high quality wetland. Special Considerations (MN R.8420.0515) This section of the rules lists nine special considerations which must be considered in the review of replacement plans. Since the project will be constructed on an area that has historically been under cultivation which resulted in degraded adjoining wetlands, several of these considerations are not applicable. Since the applicant would dedicate the eastern one- third of the site, which contains high quality wetland, woods and meadow, special fish and wildlife resources (MN R. 8420.05156 Subp.4.) would remain intact. Engineering has been completed to maintain stormwater run- off at pre -development conditions, and provide pre-treatment, so that wetlands can maintain current hydrology budget. The groundwater study completed for this site found an impermeable clay layer 20 to 40 feet thick, which provides water quality protection to the underlying aquifer. The Army Corps of Engineers review of this application did not identify the need to examine for archaeological, historic, or cultural resource sites (MN R. 8420.05156 Subp.5). Consistency with other plans(MN R. 8420.05156 Subp.10.)was demonstrated in the April 23rd, 2018, TEP meeting where the City Planner was also present, and the engineer pointed out future street connections from the proposed project that would avoid wetland impact as Hugo continues to develop. The Oneka Place NHIS Data Review (MN R. 8420.05156 Subp.3.) completed by Westwood (Attached) found there are no records of rare features within the project boundary. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 12 of 19 Off -Site Alternatives. An off -site alternatives analysis is not required for all permit applications. If you know that your proposal will require an individual permit (standard permit or letter of permission) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you may be required to provide an off -site alternatives analysis. The alternatives analysis is not required for a complete application but must be provided du the review process in order for the Corps to complete the evaluation of your application and reach a final decision. Applicants with questions about when an off -site alternatives analysis is required should contact their Corps Project Manager. Off -site alternatives have been reviewed by the applicant. Most of the City of Hugo has shown vast development in the past 15 years. In every direction within the City Limits there has been development. Outside the city limits there would be viable property for sale. However, for a development this size the applicant needs city sewer and water. The MUSA line only extends to those limits. It would not serve the project purpose to go outside the city limits because the development would need wells and septic systems. There is not enough space in this size development to accommodate that many wells and septic systems. Therefore, the applicant has rejected all off -site alternatives and proposed to develop the site they have owned site 2003, primarily because it offers City services. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 13 of 19 Project Name and/or Number: Attachment D Replacement/Compensatory Mitigation Complete this part if your application involves wetland replacement/compensatory mitigation not associated with the local road wetla replacement program. Applicants should consult Corps mitigation guidelines and WCA rules for requirements. Replacement/Compensatory Mitigation via Wetland Banking. Complete this section if you are proposing to use credits from an existi wetland bank (with an account number in the State wetland banking system) for all or part of your replacement/compensatory mitigation requirements. Wetland Bank Account # County Major Watershed # Bank Service Area # Credit Type (if applicable) Number of Credits 1580 Wabasha 41-Zumbro 8 SWCType 2 2.28 Applicants should attach documentation indicating that they have contacted the wetland bank account owner and reached at least a tentative agreement to utilize the identified credits for the project. This documentation could be a signed purchase agreement, signed application for withdrawal of credits or some other correspondence indicating an agreement between the applicant and the bank owne However, applicants are advised not to enter into a binding agreement to purchase credits until the mitigation plan is approved by the Corps and LGU. The applicant searched in the Bank Service Areas 6 and 7 for available wetland credits closest to the subject project, in accordance with applicable rules. However, in —kind replacement credits were either not available or were under contract with another parties. The next nearest credits were searched for in BSA #5 and 8. In —kind wetland credits are presently secured in BSA#8, the Graner Wetland Bank #1580, to provide a 2.5:1 wetland replacement. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 14 of 19 EAR TH SCIENCE ASSOCIA TES, INC 37445 Grand Avenue North Branch, MN 55056 651-674-6210 esa332@gmail.com earthscienceassociates.com d � Figure 1 Site Locator Map Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 { m a c n m m a �fiYti ,2 �4t �'4 ••�. 1 b pp mp y �•r t F � W c i 2020, 2030 and 2040 Metropolitan Urban Service Area Hug© SITE - WITHIN THE j 2020 MUSA, <1 ACRE — — WETLAND IMPACT I I I I I - I I I i ALT LOC 1- WITHIN THE 2020 MUSA, 30 ACRES WETLAND IMPACT _ ALT LOC 4 - OUTSIDE I THE 2020 MUSA, 25 ALT LOC 2 - WITHIN THE ACRES WETLAND IMPACT 2020 MUSA, 70 ACRES WETLAND IMPACT — I I I ALT LOC 3- WITHIN THE 2020 MUSA, 35 ACRES WETLAND IMPACT / —��--- --- — �/ —----�\- —-------------------� — I - Metropolitan Sewer System Local Sewer System NOTE: This map is not a legal document. The Metropolitan Urban Service r-12020 MUSA r7 2020 MUSA No MUSA Areas (MUSA) shown are compiled from each community's 2030 comprehensive plan and subsequent plan amendments. For those �2030 MUSA 2030 MUSA Interstate Highway communities where a 2030 comprehensive plan has not been reviewed and incorporated into GIS, data reflects their 202Ccomprehensive plan. �2040 MUSA 2040 MUSA Major Highway Areas defined as"Undesignated MUSA" designate areas where an agreed upon acreage between Undesi g Hated MUSA � Private System y Local Road he community and the Council will beto added , mezozoMusA.ForexactMUSAinfotormation contact the community - Undesignated MUSA - SMSC** —"—' Community Boundary please Reserve -- — County Boundary Shakopee Mdewakanton METROPOLITAN cITAN Sioux Community (SMSC) a 1 inch = 0.843119 miles N November 2017 SITE - WITHIN THE 2020 MUSA, <1 ACRE 2020 MUSA ESA Project #12217-18 MAR2018 EARTH SCIENCE ASSOCIATES, INC 37445 Grand Avenue WINip lNorth Branch, MN 55056 651-674-6210 , esa332@gmail.com earthscienceassociates.com ¢s National Wetland Inventory NWI Cowardin Class 2009-2014 Aquatic Bed Emergent Vegetation Forested Moss; Lichen Rock Bottom Rocky Shore Streambed (Intermittent) Scrub -Shrub Unconsolidated Bottom (Basins & Channels) Unconsolidated Shore Jbars) 4 - OUTSIDE MUSA, 25 ETLAND IMPACT ONEKA PLACE (LeROUX) ALTERNATE LOCATIONS MAP HUGO, MN Westwood MEMORANDUM Date: April 26, 2018 Re: Oneka Place NHIS Data Review File 0008260.00 To: Tony Havranek, City of Hugo c/o WSB & Associates Rachel Juba, City of Hugo 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Main (952) 937-5150 Fax (952)937-5822 westwoodps.com (888)937-5150 Len Pratt-PDC Pratt Oakwood, Dave Hempel -Westwood Professional Services, Cc: Ken Meeks -Earth Science Associates From: Kelly Kunst A review of the MN DNR Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) database licensed to Westwood (LA-876, June 2017) was conducted for records of federal or state -listed rare, threatened or endangered species or habitats in, and within one mile of the Oneka Place Project located in Hugo, Minnesota (Exhibit 1). Results of the review found there were no records of rare features within the Project boundary. Three records for rare species occurred within one mile of the Project boundary and included one record for the state -listed threatened Blanding's Turtle (Emydoidea blandingii) and one record for the state -listed threatened Wilson's Phalarope (Phalaropus tricolor). The third record was for the Upland Sandpiper (Bartramia longicauda) which is on the state Watchlist. Please note that the lack of rare species or habitat records within the Project should not be interpreted to mean a lack of occurrence; instead, it may only imply that the area has not been surveyed. This review consisted only of identification of NHIS database records in and within one mile of the Project and did not evaluate other databases of biological resources such as MN DNR native plant communities or Minnesota Biological Survey Sites of Biodiversity Significance. This review does not include an evaluation of potential rare species habitat in and around the Project nor does it provide recommendations for best management practices to avoid impacts to sensitive resources. Multi -Disciplined Surveying & Engineering TBPLS Finn No. 10074302 westwoodps.com W 1. 2018 stwood�r Jessi nal Services, ! I r e tr} � , 4. (_ � .Ilr� �, •i � Y_.ay �J ��. t I.l �I �Z 177th St-N 9` 175th St;N 1 �i i } 0 174th —St" y _80th St E. -��� # ',�,,I c ��'+ ■ � .�,. f 170th'St<N x I Co Rd 4a ' .; Co"Hwy 4 Y- - r - I ' : > r = > Q _Q - _ ,�c o LL f ' ' WC �.165th Sf.N; 7t y Co Rd.6. I' ti Y k a-4ta" W - - 159th IF i- : �. 2 St'N �+ I r Fib. _ 158th St N' u.. .e 1 Z. I 11 3 > \ o Z 15jth St N- i I. _ r <, I 1 y .N r e Goodview Trl CD N 0-1 d gtN 152n 152nd StN J Y >> c) _ Y w> c F_'av s U' r O(keKa�-a _ _ _p -_ -f Co Hwy 1.4 1 Main St GT�PiF v F O tYff C TIT 4, x: ,.: reach { - 147th St N m _ i -- ~= z - men Rd I N I 7:•ar> - r.¢.1.,1� C Hw . Qr Q oo fl. — er 145th St N - L i fry4 N A I� t Ory o °I ir_ k 5a d< IFr��l' })C7yti ,, Z Fairview St ; Mo °'rr ohman,Rd°, - � r ' LO a Legend F�,,,r �a) St N �a - o 141st' E Cedar.St: < eStqVeN - Q> 140thLStN > 0 Project Boundary ° C 3 One Mile Buffer _ f LL + 'I ��` 0 �'a8a j x L - i Data Soume(s): USDA-NRCS (2002), MDCT BaseMap Roads (2015), Westwood (2018) Oneka Place Hugo, Minnesota Westwood N I Feet NHIS Data Review Site Location A Toll Free (888)937-5150 westwoodps.com O 2,5�� Westwood Professional Services, Inc. EXHIBIT 1 3/30/2018 Gmail - Re: Graner Wetland Bank M Gmail Re: Graner Wetland Bank 1 message Len Pratt <lepratt@pratthomes.com> To: "bullmode@yahoo.com" <bullmode@yahoo.com> Cc: Roxanne <roxanne@pratthomes.com>, Dan Seeman <denad@frontiernet.net> Ken Meek <esa332@gmail.com> Fri, Mar 30, 2018 at 6:00 AM Jane..thank you for this follow up correspondence. Roxanne will assist me in processing the paperwork today. Happy Easter. Len Pratt 612-834-1718 Sent from my iPhone On Mar 29, 2018, at 11:46 AM, "bullmode@yahoo.com" <bullmode@yahoo.com> wrote: Mr. Pratt, It was a pleasure speaking with you yesterday. I've attached our Bank fee policy and a MOU that I hope will fulfill your requirements. If you need a signed hard copy just let me know. I appreciate your reaching out to us and look forward to a successful transaction. I'm fully cognizant of the delays and re -directs sometimes involved in bringing a project to fruition so don't be concerned about the time element. I'm prepared to hold the reserve as long as needed. Thank you for your business and please let me know if there's anything else you might require. Jane Glomski Graner Wetland Bank #1580 <Pratt_MOU.pdf> <Pratt_CFPolicy. pdf> https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=82f6O75fl a&jsver=Z-grDj2gpow. en.&view=pt&search=inbox&th=1627690a6851 d676&sim1=1627690a6851 d676 I* Page 1 of 2 1. Lake Superior - North 29, Cottonwood River 2. Lake Superior - South 30. Blue Earth River 3. St. Louis River 31. Watonwan River 4. CLoquet River 32. Le Sueur River 5. Nemadji River 33, Minnesota River - ce water watersheds )le below lists the n the USGS which d detailed minor innesota, TA 57. Red River of the North 58. Buffalo River 59. Marsh River 60. Wild Rice River 61. Sandhill River ersheds/mamhtml 6' 10/2009 12 it .q- O iq M REV 1: 21 NOV17, REVISIONS FROM 16NOV 17 TEP VISIT ESA Project#122-17 21JUN17 EARTH SCIENCE ASSOCIATES. INC 37445 Grand Avenue North Branch, MN 55056 651-674-6210 R' esa332@gmail.com earthscienceassociates.com 3 7 s 10 9 o - z m 1}I\M14I�h'4 1 max. O4 OFFSITE HYDROLOGY DETERMINATION AREA (HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTO REVIEW) WETLAND 3 OIL AND VEGETATION SAMPLE LOCATION Est 1 S9TH ST N FIGURE 2 WETLAND DELINEATION SITE DIAGRAM � s _ •f 3y`Vf��_J-'t,i _ �.�` Y. T%I ! ''� �'g -r,.� r Rtf T - _ I " I , II r,•, .: ,�. �� !� '-/=�, -,J ..I, ,� } i �� �.1._ ��`r. - � r. vf'\% e_�. f�-� �.. /^� - J„ I- �+�., �k 'L1 �:� 1 - t i s _ f . r �t--••��I i�`{ ',, 1 �'1��'f'�:. I ,-�' 4 - t -_ `-. C' l '� i - fl.'11 �•� 1 ��. _�J. I� _� _ j ! cq _ --� ly ' f . M- i � ��'S i ` i•r �' � r' I rQy�' � 7 q1 0 � .A r � "� J :'P.7 - ^M n i:, Ilr o, j - �'�`T _ .: �, •``a .f t .. _+, ,� r.-� _ f7`�_' �s.�& '� r1r , -- - -- r� ;,, �• - t -;f r _ J �;f ./-� f Y 77 ny.. vJ�, n� _ _]I 9'' 1 MILE —� ! J [ +, y c, QS75 �� - 1 Y` � - -17 _= - .. 7 w �` si r'. $ac, '` --_" _ : �_, 7 � { , e-,�" .}l r� ___ ! ; 3' J 4;, y'I �! ! r f� `�*• Ili '�t, r -�' F .� 1 I '`- �L I ��\ �` - - - i� - � Qx. +.r' -��� • + sv `Y<p � � I- , ;I J J -psi r A r N ■ F �`�1 p _ 4� �� �f�l i �3' � _ '�� ! � q g � � I'�� - _ l:• f - 3 ,. - 4 - !�-'�;`•, �. J —"'�i �� t. •,I-, I ;�7 �'1,r�' f � ''r3��1... �rt�I, :sf IL 1 �' .�.' ,,, _ �.� (- _ i' l -i r I �_ �i�r _ � I �, / =>� T■� I ' - it �.� I � 1 � ;.. � E® - $ J. 11:: _ -j .- ' � t .. � \ -- -. J�R��jY h' r"I "S �/%! ) �A ".? �_�rtJ-___ .r , I` e{ � i Ir` A I� ` 1 � f - I,! s✓ �-'GOB a I �i , l ,,ry •, T )R ?� - '; �_ 1(7 �,-� 1 !�� � -1% .�� 'I � �.... ----. - - "fi�srrrrer (,,� �, �•�eatoo , �' S�tEe,f,l i! �' SQ ur SITE, r '�1t S - � tl J- � 1'• f —. �! ', i_„� � I ,JI - lt. �A� ' I�f�l � � _ E .a yp" q —, X €_ o f 4. r V J v1 5 A i�z �: y _ r nxiT.TY RE[,TrDngL- -` N l ` I Watok Lake Ih 879 s s.r ' _ ` .� :sr� :_._.�_ w. •' n r� r'` S'4`.``' - .. . , � f r 4 - .. :! � ` ,'K; �. - I ti 't+t ti - s,l. I \ y rJ �' d f - /',1 r e � jr� �•� Y • � t ti � t,. - - y - 882 ■� r 7{s.}.7.ry t.: p i y� ) •. 4 °ic_ 4 '� , cente're4lie Lake L 22 w. -'� R`- _ 5;3� r r. t _ efts ,.• - y - � - - w °. $ 9 + � g ,. II- Gib � +,j• #�1 �\ � - s' •--•� } .. .. � i' r �rerl�� t �ti � Iti] �,� '�. � � y � ��;m I I_� 7 ..o • s 71 w.' � S eve � � � /1 �` 'X�J,"• o - _ I Wk , -. ___ II �- `'i. � r(^ L :�l{ t�/ ! •X 1r ` y "y. �';r-� % �'S ^� r • • i1III - t 28 w re ��I �...� S � - �' z.�-- I.i' � � � I��� _ �•.. t � - fit f � +I. �, { I� l• I � ti Y1' r _ I /[t / { C • 1• :'W - _ -� 'Y � , 5 .4 . � ehir I '' f _ _ -'� / r�-c � I r-__5 � � L I ,� "m I. ;I u r+-0e.. +g' - � A' �I � -� ,. - _ � �k°r0 r lei• a. I I y;, ESA Project #12217-18 FEB2018 1 EARTH SCIENCE ASSOCIATES. INC. ti 966 { A. 37445 Grand Avenue i K ' — z :" I `' �: � �, t •_ _: , r ONEKA PLACE (LeROUX) North Branch, MN 55056 651 674 6210 GROUNDWATER STUDY esa332@gmail.com earthscienceassociates.com —``'k` L USGS 7.5 MAP REGIONAL VIEW �'1579= sr 1?Sih'S[:W V4N � rain i 4` ONEKA PLACE s�°�s-�r,�_a11-u N discharges to I � SA65 "r17J 1 z-R 1) Clearwater Creek West, _r 2) Clearwater Creek North, and - 3) Hardwood Creek. warm ry .. �r4 •SJ3BFRJ Cal-P — 'Ttho &i W � 1#5eh'S[hl '!Mad' JAIT-036-Pi : y � m i i E1 ! e n, fr I w a � 13aM Fumy RAJ IV � � a Ulm 51 s o •c J Lwrd3S� Li�9J. I�f.+ '•zi ;soh sJ3 T f��6- SA MT L-I s-P ------------------ SJ i MT-175-1 P- - - -_- tnir.-Si w- SJ I MT-� � s-P SA MT_b,: I -P Legend Discharge Locations Clearwater Creek Central *� Clearwater Creek North Clearwater Creek Northeast #I Clearwater Creek :South Clearwater Creek Southeast Cieam-ater Creek West � Hafcfwood Creek North Hardwood Creek West City Bounder I From: OWN Capital Improvement Plan For Stormwater Projects Within The City Of Hugo. 2011. WSB 20 ESA Project #122,17-18 MAR2018 43' + La S 0 1,750 3,500 7.000 Feet WSB City of HLIgO I..(No .di l&h:i. fM" Juice 17, 2011 it s • cc Z~ Z Lk Qi ;j y Si ir- ! Y 0) 0 a p p 6 r ko m *� u i 4D t*3 Y `L a u u u u N � ^c rz r m rA [m B L9 p y m p Q dl c N c a N N i � a a) N 4 [h U V m m N N IPJ m -r 'T N -r T v.a.Je n rl }4 N rl N 111 �i i N: V � O rrww U C—J � O cII U � co ~ co o � Q o z3LD zLD� � Q) c chi E a ��m� W cn cn imm. r� i - HISTORICAL AERIAL REVIEW AREA 5 WTL Jn4 EARTH SCIENCE ASSO CIA TES, INC, 37445 Grand Avenue a North Branch, MN 55056 651-674-6210 esa332@gmail.com earthscienceassociates.com PAGE 1 OF 2 Figure 7 Photos 4 i° CHANNELBET 404. 4 w r. r WETLANDS FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT Oneka Place Hugo, Minnesota 55038 45.183* N., 93.010*W. Section 7, T.31 N., R.21 W. Washington County, MN Prepared on Behalf of.- Leonard W. Pratt, President CPDC-Pratt-Oakwood LLC 3500 Willow Lake Boulevard, Suite 100 Vadnais Heights, MN 55110 Prepared by: Earth Science Associates, Inc. 37445 Grand Avenue North Branch, Minnesota 55056 ESA Project #12217-18 Revision I April 2018 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION 2.0 METHODS 3.0 MnRAM INPUT 4.0 RESULTS 5.0 STANDARD OF CARE Attachments: • Site Locator Map • #4 Current Preliminary Grading Plan 3-19-18 • Site Diagram — Wetland Boundary • P8 Water Quality Modeling Discharge Locations • Photos • MNRAM Management Classification Reports • MNRAM Wetland Functional Assessment & Community Summary Reports Notes on Revision 1: Project changes which occurred after this report was written, and items identified during regulatory agency review, have necessitated this update. In order to relieve the reviewer from the tedium of reviewing documentation previously submitted, revised verbiage will be typed in Courier New font . 1.0 INTRODUCTION Oneka Place Hugo, MN 45.183* N., 93.010*W. Section 17, T.31 N., R.21 W. Washington County, Minnesota As authorized by CPDC-Pratt-Oakwood LLC, Earth Science Associates, Inc. (ESA) has performed a Wetlands Functional Assessment on a 117.5 acre parcel consisting of agricultural land, woods, and wetlands. The site is located north of the terminus of Oneka Parkway North (See Site Locator Map). On the agricultural portion of the site, the western two-thirds, the developer plans to construct 177 single-family lots (142 single family and 35 villa homes) in four phases. Oneka Parkway North will be extended to join with 165th Street North. The eastern one-third, which contains high quality sedge meadow (Type 2) and shallow marsh (Type 3) wetland plant communities, will be dedicated to the City of Hugo for preservation and a passive trail system, and possible use for on -site wetland mitigation. MNRAM, an acronym for Minnesota Routine Assessment Method for Evaluating Wetland Functions, was originally devised after passage of the Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) in 1991 in order to fill the need for a practical assessment tool that would help local authorities make sound wetland management decisions as they assumed responsibility for regulating wetland impacts. Wetland Management Classification within MNRAM applies the results of wetland functions and values in order to determine the various management classifications. For each management classification level, management strategies can then be applied to meet the general goals of wetland protection. Our focus is on those wetlands which will be unavoidably impacted by the planned development. A wetlands functional assessment has also been completed for the on -site replacement wetland in order to provide assurance that the functions and values of the replacement wetland will exceed the functions and values of those wetlands unavoidably impacted. 2.0 METHODS Following completion of a wetland delineation and report of the subject property, the results were entered into MNRAM version 3.4, the current edition of the program. The program asks 72 questions based on the physical setting and field observations relating to the subject wetland. For each wetland evaluated, the program creates Wetland Functional Assessment Summary for 12 wetland functions/value characteristics, a Wetland Community Summary, and a Management Classification Report for each wetland evaluated. The current grading plan (See #4 Current Preliminary Grading Plan 3-19-18) will unavoidably fill or drain portions of seven (7) wetland areas. That is, wetland B, BB, D-E, F, I, L, and K (See Wetland Delineation Site Diagram). A description of each wetland has been summarized in the wetland delineation report previously prepared for this site. Information from the delineation report is entered into the MNRAM program. Two summary reports are then generated by the program, 1) A Wetland Functional Assessment & Community Summary, and 2) a Management Classification Report. 3.0 MNRAM INPUT Initial site data is entered into the General Information section of MNRAM 3.4. The site is located in the Mississippi River -Twin Cities Watershed Basin, #20, in Wetland Bank Service Area 7. The subject property drains into three (3) discharge locations; southwest into Clearwater Creek West, east and south into Clearwater Creek North, and north into Hardwood Creek (See attached figure: P8 Water Quality Modeling Discharge Locations from The Capital Improvement Plan For Stormwater Projects Within the City of Hugo (WSB, 2011)) The UTM coordinate location, elevation, and size, of each wetland is entered. The wetland basins are described below. Wetland areas B, BB, D-E, F and I: • Circular 39: Type 2 • Cowardin: PEM1A • Eggers and Reed: Fresh (Wet) Meadow Wetland areas B, E, F and I are low lying areas within crop land and are characterized by monotypic stands of reed canary grass (Phalarus arunducia). Wetland BB, a partially drained basin which discharges into a ditch, had been plowed the previous fall prior to the 2017 site visit. The northward draining swale from wetland E to D was covered with reed canary at the time of the site visit, but has historically been farmed. The E-D swale, which was not included as wetland in the 2006 delineation, served as a soil conservation feature at the time of the 2017 site visit. Soils are primarily clay loam rather that sandy loam as indicated by NRCS mapping. • Wetland areas B and BB discharge into Clearwater Creek West. • Wetland areas D-E, F and I discharge into Hardwood Creek Wetland L: • Circular 39: Type 2/3 • Cowardin: PEM1C • Eggers and Reed: Shallow Marsh Wetland L is an easterly flowing Type 2/3 wetland complex which contains a diverse plant community which includes, but is not limited to, slough sedge (Carex atherodes), hummock sedge (Carex stricta), giant bur -reed (Sparganium eurycarpum), softstem bulrush (Schoenoplectus tabernaemontani) and broad leaf cattail (Typha latifolia). Much of the north boundary is fairly abrupt with cattail and deep muck in the wetland adjacent to a thick growth of prickly ash (Zanthoxylum americanum) shrubbery in the upland. The remaining upland/wetland boundary is gradual. Wetland L is connected with wetlands K, M, N and R, and provides a water quality filter mechanism for the agricultural runoff from the western part of the site. • Wetland L discharges into Clearwater Creek North. Wetland P: • Circular 39: Type 7 • Cowardin: PFO1B • Eggers and Reed: Hardwood Swamp Green ash (Fraxinus pennsylvanica) boxelder (Acer negundo) and American elm (Ulmus americana) are dominant with an understory of reed canary and a sparsely vegetated concave surface. • Wetland P discharges into Clearwater Creek North. 4.0 RESULTS Two summary reports for each wetland under consideration have been generated by the MNRAM 3.4 program, 1) A Wetland Functional Assessment & Community Summary, and 2) a Management Classification Report. Results are summarized below: Wetland areas B. BB. D-E. F . I and P • Wetland areas B, BB, D-E, F , I and P are classified as Manage 3 in the Management Classification Reports. The critical function that caused these wetland areas to rank as Manage 3 was Vegetative Diversity. Manage 3 wetlands require the least amount of protection in order to maintain their current function and value. • The Wetland Functional Assessment Summaries for wetland areas B, BB, D-E, F , I and P ranked the following applicable wetland functions as Low: • Maintenance of Hydrologic Regime • Downstream Water Quality • Maintenance of Wetland Water Quality • Maintenance of Characteristic Wildlife Habitat Structure • Aesthetical, Recreational, Educational, Cultural • Additional Stormwater Needs • Wetland functions ranked Moderate for these wetlands include: • Flood / Stormwater Attenuation, and • Wetland Sensitivity to Stormwater and Urban Development • The Wetland Community Summary ranks Vegetative Diversity/Integrity as Low. Wetland L • Wetland area L classified as Preserve in the Management Classification Report. The critical function that caused this wetland area to rank as Preserve was Maintenance of Hydrologic Regime and Vegetative Diversity. Wetlands ranked Preserve require the greatest amount of protection in order to maintain their current function and value. • The Wetland Functional Assessment Summary for wetland area L ranked the following applicable wetland functions as Moderate: • Flood / Stormwater Attenuation • Maintenance of Wetland Water Quality • Maintenance of Characteristic Wildlife Habitat Structure • Maintenance of Characteristic Amphibian Habitat • Aesthetics, Recreational, Educational, Cultural • Additional Stormwater Needs • Wetland functions ranked High for wetland L include: • Maintenance of Hydrologic Regime • Downstream Water Quality, and • Wetland Sensitivity to Stormwater and Urban Development • The Wetland Community Summary ranks Vegetative Diversity/Integrity as High. Replacement Wetland Off -site replacement would consist of in -kind wetland credits are presently secured in BSA#8, the Graner Wetland Bank #1580, to provide a 2.5:1 wetland replacement. Since wetland bank sites are not approved until fully functional, the replacement wetland is certain to provide greater wetland function and value than those unavoidably impacted. 5.0 STANDARD OF CARE The opinions presented in this report are based on information collected during the course of this study and represent Earth Science Associates' professional opinion and, as such, are not a guarantee. Earth Science Associates' professional judgment is based on generally accepted practices exercised by professionals currently practicing in this area under similar budget and time constraints. Certain information contained in this report may have been provided by companies, agencies, and/or personal contacts not within Earth Science Associates' employ. Earth Science Associates will make no representation or warranties that such information is accurate or that any independent investigation, beyond the agreed Scope of Services, has been or will be made to verify the accuracy of such information. Prepared/Reviewed by: Earth Science Associates, Inc. Kenneth E. Meek, PG, CPG Principal Registered Professional Geologist (MN) #30221 AIPG Certified Professional Geologist (USA) #08600 OSHA 40 hour HAZWOPER Certified 1992 MDH Licensed Monitoring Well Contractor #788, #1685 Certified Wetland Delineator #1199 Certified Landfill Operator #52087428 Attachments: • Site Locator Map • #4 Current Preliminary Grading Plan 3-19-18 • Site Diagram — Wetland Boundary • P8 Water Quality Modeling Discharge Locations • Photos • MNRAM Management Classification Reports • MNRAM Wetland Functional Assessment & Community Summary Reports SL M, �L 41 J1. I , I - 1Y•°FTF� .1, ; '-', h _ E i M 11Gw • _ i - ' � � ems= ' * �.. s .I r lu -. '+F� 'i'Ls'1' siF�t4Y.".'t� I tt:�4' I FY7f 1i �P tikR __., ��_-s i3.` •'r rl1.14'T iJ.:J ;1k T=:ILTAT10F1✓ -iEis. IC -AL A. Plc.lUqEqlFeVi L,tl7r�r.sa:TrwF.a�'4r�Lgrxs4 iti1e. ETiT CN rSa Lr-C 7 .' ''3CT•�.,r.y :3,�w�cu2oear4crty 34L'I I I r rT Gri WETLAx cm 44EAT.Ixy _� STE GIA aqA IV -wr -21 k 3m1?q--f,jAdmL'.L -01p v a;-!. --IJEK6,3LACF "H.,L gee LU 'arvi-dar Cf-gok vie. L, r C rc 2 p :I fj fog k. sop Laq,bnd al—hwgo Lftkbarm 0 ('cmrwflvr 1, -i-- 9 CEArveciba: LemrV �Irnrn i:mwrwam CrikaL 4tm i M M-NiMcmW C rmIL W I I I i I LgTkrWLI C,L,b ak -T ave %'P"Imjm� 3IIIPt4m,F-v='Alth T-A ;i CL pl City of I] u liqu, 17,191 1 pr j g cn _ RS L' s U`. M. '• {11j a 7{ � { cc Ln - 33 c+ Y _ � Nk M ram.. • :. —a T� 4� 1• .. + r, L:2 _. !t . e° - f Z — f1i a f FyF L7 1 L- ' r7 - _ kr Zl NL 9 �4 = v •� _v _z r-E :h, Tom' rD r > 2�. rti 7 to fG G �• fd G rt � oRL U in _T 4d!o 3 r�-t di W CL C z Lei :3 CL En 0 CL C {] m ..! .+" �77CL rD ral ,ry r+ Y m r a ED v 5 h: < I � ., h n - ' hJ L'A =' d{;. r Oil SP C 4r .x} n 4 r+, � CLLotµ N r-I Q t 'a n'I Pr fG N 3 �? � r Q m • i w �- MCU '± a to � III r > CL IVm .II rD Q m � � i IL ILI rt �° -LA Q Incu Q tl m 6M ' 'D w =F* 7A ro Q r•r m � L� {' n w M fl !R I f � ul r+ 7 F. � � r_ r �• !r N Ul ti V� rt• r# T T 13 e r I � �: h [ N A r r-I ti iIL •I- f3 R IF' c �a �+ 2 73I o a R a ' 10 ri IV Q IYicr cr tiT a W .7 'mod- IG 3 ram" ' {p• Cu Mi r lip �. tLa J Tkr m T lu R IT y I Im D 1 el_ .r� i 5. al £,S 77 cu 'J FLn �� _� a C . '+ ate... 7 � m m 4 0 rt FM ELJ Y ypp Eliv I � * ELI Q zy, w rt w W =r 4� Q D `I III E _ rF w E.31 s"y IA tv { 1 � fi I LH C n• Cc 1k D IF e pn 'A °- i yry Lr IT,•f .+ti I-• W. 0 d. 1 m { t f Sim C {15 -J 4 m T - o 0 U, cr Q aaS 19 i-F T F 11 r=�•F QL f1 tip Ol ua R C et a LI, IanSp CL. { a- r r Q F'S _ a rr n nu a Q r•F. L R T i3 L C n 7 CA,�'} Lo :Ia C nr W 7 4 ci 3 r Sri L.,C 1° R1 a - C `I 3LA rTk du — t EU � lu I v # ce rr YI cu a `T �': ru I °r r G� r � � D ru ti IM "� ' d+ S ay '� iS ,Q .•t iG ' ri �. is •I � I A rF rr LL 7 icy i[ � pry a w �� 1 4 w j9. r 2 13 ri ram, a �{ ' V 3 '+ 3 fE 3 RI 13 I 1 W o 4 4� �, 0 O ' O w M a wp CL m fP � aQ4 m as FV EL EV Q a �" r' ru rj M '� ❑ �' W �' @i" qqq S t s 91 V r5 � ❑ Ln I V CI � r L" =, m* Z% m rnr n � z V 7 ro u — .r3 I 1 - lu m J n _ (D 4 P3 -0 L ri 4 n 2 jc 116' �I r^ uaa r +? =F I o aj r- ¢ - � n 2 4 � x -C• m �• m Ul GO rt ID J ID ro F LA z u r Ku Ku Y Lv o, �r fl ri .� "1 Ira-t rt r rt py J fl 9- 3 : } iG Rt _ L rb ID .p 7 5 - ` M s 7 9 }, CL i fo X S w a Fy: r cb m a Q Z > C: CD p A � C _ rz •'-P lR IL tr. d S � v mu w m z z P'-• 71 el 'a '+ .+ cu -0 o � _ T !! 4 � 0 N '•F /T CL I i GI tX 3;- 1 O _+ C S •- D Ln b lu '4� ru C 7jD y La cr I M jU _ Q Pw CL �: z - ro c � K K ' P° :A f R �• Lr. C ti � ti Ih �' PD C 7 ry d Ln 3 L� rti 3 �* M b. r 9 m r c m lu JA C cu [u r y}� W 4� 7 al � rt :E f; C LW C r ra' rn k m IV I� Lrl M y e i7 W `8 {] IV I' raw rT � I v' w r. 'A lk :F- C LF. a I C, _ } •4 S •p e rn r � Q G C J f fn rn � ti - z Z — r Icr ° � c r+ Ii _. FV _ �_ 'a Q cr N t y � Cr pl nF ?6 E a ru ,�• Ofl ,fir q rr ;:v Lr-Let _ 7 � r µ Nlu m C3 La13 — cr1 V � T vi• V T el. a a:�_ 'D 13 Tr -I -, aj 9d D Z rp T R Ipp .p W jp T ',T '`� r V ,DU -z m m E + r I C � # ra + a z� ,, a s d q• ; Q q r• _ GL CL W rD fo X 17 ! �u •' � ;=v d, ;el rD :- � �• 'n, cm V P' c= 3 r E � f aj � eD r Z n c T p Ulfp in � w A- t ,+ate CL 12 D I lk 21 ' c rF co fIj a •h rD t13° r]CL rt 1i 3 13. r17 7 �d !p 10 .— � ro e, C tY w .•f ' • X 8.9 a O. �• r+ C i {U •�S Lei $ C =w � s 0 rra �T' _ 3 = -P Q . ry cu , 3 m n 13- rt �' M � f. � d __ � c t Q c f'] n Gn Ln fL 5 I. '+ k7i F 3 ti 9 GM H D ET du C� w n I — _i ' t z ,r n c a rm �- m r c eD � x+ ¢ +r # 4 S' i rp i Z On Q .. en > f,b ro ro > e� •r'•F K i fin '°P '� rt �' t'. 1• d = Q C ,7 ar R7 4_ M f: 1"Z rli C3 A 3 Y•+ 3 a a R n :-r C � :r m : 2 T Rl7 ,rl CL n � Qj =r 3 D n Q �n fi A :3 C i � T rt N p�•,} 0 V, C a . T 9t 7 t P.] rf: =r . } .Q Go —, Q _ SJ .F rD iu T iP h rt r`�r� u rb ~ W L- cu 1�1 {{ 0 — • •� _ :••FEr '� .�• R = fo n' r =r cu L W i ir EA'A H• Ali � h B- 1 Q �• ram. Z i-• 3 7 � °A {•7 dj 2 2 IM T A C 0 C > � rCJ �7 c c a fx . 8 C S 7A• srr 5 m ra D .u- rp 0 a m > I _ +Q d �, n crM; a+ F m 2: cr rn "P tl 7 a' -n c, J Ku P7 rP 'v.J VI � � t ro OC: rcl 199 r, � f r•F �a t ; v — -13 £' d! 1 ^ rt r-F IV rm a� n. C t cm r_ ti a, 0' u 1 _ C M t # :3 4 ti, °art ti c r•i Y M I,h x 1 x r5 •T .•t � i :3 J J LA Z W ly � x }{ x 2K s iy S S f 7 00 ai o y a _ . M� mo T — r,r ft :3 fD � r+ r+ w � w. 't n aj -13 '•F 7 t T C Z cu X flD FD { FM Q. c ;x a fD ry J am • cr _ y Welland Fun ctional Assessment Summary iftknfopolia Maywowwcol Yf Phadr ?;vw 4IreYAr of WpOaero F mkind,l4rrrr �'�dr»� ,� f i'frirair�rc Rr�'mr k � I" gy4rg?oy {a I, A;�r� 1�°*air �iQu tlk �'�� J'Ivaatir,5arr M1=,US L'LL`diETLAND 3 �ep•Rs�k -alFlxt�^A•� I-� ;±.}11H•Irti4!k� x.ilc . U rcsc'en�!°FY:rtl'._,I�• ��I�-e,.r4n1 II HI Hill Culk'll ].1} °,a< �}:8a s.ii Imo• KIC7,7,= Lcsn I •:: "d ,PNk:L_ AMMVmirf latfrararo!acdon :Idaroanra.nallit of iMarr.4una VI .irn-ileurar WL i.in AErn&jmj : L�Aliathii Ch".0romrfc 11 0f d°hyr r ilof°a C�rawji. Wrr PSNFMVdW-r Necyr+lWaLrr Ff'ihi°'Ve- -M"lme 'h Gtcvl eric A n I plkll .n R;ww ¢kearaver.1vn aI]d L*dm Yarded%nr wolfaly N. Mo Prarrrrera 1F'bh Mkbime fl'aawaar Vurcyarj i.a+Rmfa cini I'mN f-Vraa•aiprr knarrr jaf Lkw?arminr Iveedf •'L—'0LIL4ND r¢:= D.CU I:I'I:} C.I_ !II;II q2:.—hh5fihrl II,•.1 D.'0 nw-irnr uk '+4d PrPL :a;e Fill Ap:Fi;*� N:r ATI Rho KxlC •u6 I•�W W'elland Commanky I5ammary 4�'eddar :4IM-0 Z fknole:r irte0M;dWA-4;?V.Wtaritrvur dI3fa. Co-wardirr C rv1,rAv ck"si li rieki n -10 PEFliA Tym e Tr'e�lec�tll�e f��'�•l+rxrl ��'azle�xr{� a�ur��I� . f�xti�xr�'eraa '1 r I r�kiFli}'YdY I} llPfirl'�(�dr�d fir�,�h�Yd Comrwj roi@ v W'of�Qnd 1 ,• Rhfod wakarrd Fi'erliand Airfimg HatiM,R It 7.+0 z CAP) j�L�rr• afi+I• tat:,'.=Fir=7_Iv Tu:smy. kdri; h e'o. 201 E Pft;�4 - -I - of oloox Dol.M^►*Plea of 1p+ro & SFfe r�h.::�$gMP it aago fi dW�6kpfeye }i'-P Waal sAlluAlmn Roor.l°1Rr tL em Oa app a b _k..; _. _�+L I L� fdl} ?Fi �n:a•w;��l'-1ar�u rent �° I�a-e •� � I fiXl•ae�sknY'F1:�1"ro�a-, i�ps�eXeel a ::I , -arida t P.r r,5�'f a � I'P9Prk�rrir� in d v,J tuiWI .° � r7 ti i I COD lew k%: k P7w°'e74Calb. e}fe,irrrxrra:cidd'¢n! f�ie+r• TNA>�DiR e7:id;hy-een,Rim .r v,f flharatvoeiok Rgiltimflrw'ill Cho rnr+rirrl, rl�rae,� RaGr lellli �eY�*mmwjj*lgr i,,.rhvN.0fee 4l}i Ore 6'a�6� w Crirf5nc, rim��.b.�:bfan 94•Jrhrwd.43�p0 � y+t Ne S'Jier�; FyMn� I+aac. �fcn'aa� d�rrtiar�Yesn� m .5kaw rF�lir` :�f�sar + ! U Hatimll, Ffakenf �we4s�rsJ iPauanrer�rol' LwT Mrrrcw rrrer Fa error rraf knw •r'l%L.le,,'e wL 44Ffaiw is,� a.C13 e: ''.r*r1eU,r Nrcd� * il.e e.7N r1a1 Jrp7i + 44 H.-Y t.y•I �Thk LYN ACC rariig%lia~t'�a1jjX le- etland Commuml Say"allary N�erJraeR�dfR — I •n CwaiW—rdtrYtItti ! I �m aa.'ddrrr+d flfhe.0 Akrr ge virr{gp adtd44RF - xr .39 nA 94ni preipfm r)rzmumrKIan � o_e mg(i We,andoor 4[� {'oFJ , T $hjF! "r%Pd P-mj-- I"IcsI-Well 'RRII3�. .�� g r.7°a nptb g Marfft,1 __ I L�� NA, '4r-.Arr4WL•le LJ ��P�lni'p'� iFJeC��j� C��kre�LJ�raN irFirlp. 7!1-(J3y. I'Adi[h P 1, 25-8 P*T4M 1 Of 1 elland Funchf nal ANNe"WN#jj?nj Summary ,!a'arlw► ar Marhrommo Of F OO& f +-umrrvff 'Uri i}o&.tw 1'6'Fi'u+Ila'ti'll'Rlt 1il. COlilAr �hi%p T HP&LJakfr ur weary wartr gG,4y Yhvrr7"irr -NL1,APL p Urwcrz rfi,'rr 1"A'�ihj1wmnl:nolzll.11:ubrrll.:co •F-H Roxfmo wiramfan mil" I 'n I"F }rriun asa I.• Ixra•Yhnla:ll'"GF7 I 4.1C OA 0.3C i3.1 Jail 14$JM rt:113. 1I C{ .fd'd.nIlona nLk of Acsrllh�•�+l•�: ��d�JRJTAFf �1@f r5J7Ri JtdtJ �1�d�alCh+rxruic ,idmhe![vef�ru�� pf �:I�'iTiarCF.IdJiS ii �l?dk(fr MR 6 fMY i%�YSnr:afin,R:' finPrch6� Ittrda.a.J 'Ii'�iidnl7',5an�iA�F'+',� �i.da�'�°nrri,� �'hAY�h'i�i1 ,,9c Atvj)Ai m {��tw` 14Rdl W10,* Afr�u eh re ,[�d7P:,dil'iff" `��iVer F'f�J •i Y9dtJ .�J LA IInI Nd"r'f FYjrh.ikiPiiM16s7 CLIftaw co ffJifLR'w Vies Were Ci-liti POrL ti r&q yu,l'r rhnl4 �`r €tiaerll'IIJ ti7 `,� K^. P_ ar•=n �ryu •.� J:J t. a 7xb fk'E'C.O�In F•AVJ .°F•d'�d�S 4 G.X _acrcd.i-glrn C:a] C.io= :I I UFs_h.vI:H• 4 ..�� FiOt �:�'F.6:HIlw �•itl Yi:flY'�: JCIi r17C Mx.,XIi iIH F.�_r" wk WA eland 'om en Summary VEizerra' ipw A I+e/IHtegri'rr I— CowanfifNdIlV�dtrrai M ff'�dr iir Namd tdl�iLlPAr,+4df�r cif p ff0.9i car �'�flhfffid ( dkri M fddiifv tt-'6?iQndP Arcs Aye I�r CiifJ ird .4kcrxe T+fr " f+h� �f rolV fib+ 5F' C•t,+�fi11'f�Ei1'�t4 14Ek !_ 1 A -al: G -i C. PL Wl' 3s57 -21 L'f-rni ::�_ti'A 7F,:� 2 `777 ;"�t_I} Fr^a i i�1+��41r�+a J��tIJI�. �Jf1�J� —` �CPi1P� fWan #"v s 1,�•vr �—� I� i� �.i C, a. ° I r:Yf L�iY F•JUI ��It:aoie [ lt�rar�trs r�rrr�ls prle�e r. +ac�rr ran dQW, rt,99L:ay. Vr,.r, h 20, 2j1 H Wirt4L nd Functional Asswment Summary °1,10 in e*ira ff; r .Af+LntPnprirr °If Fd Td.. DURP13Yr&aLu elf WcrWAJ f{4v:i'f.U.,Xir .Warn rlarcp }darn' Warry 5-6&ltep �+'rriQ&; ,�'�sl,r 11 a�+alnar BnraR; R�X�wr .'61rti I]Nj$ja.11 1;�Tahv il!y rY1n f' 4' IKAi'L_4ti_IL.%Nmot r)HF, rr•-I*ck.gnl;nelanJCUI Ml.:_Cp:esIP'm'A M.ix-lnn.■;Ii'.-y•V,y4F-I C.IC A.-91 I1,:9: IJ•1: aCa I ax ryAw, ytrila Uee NY. e.:CL:-ab c ,�,deWif)a1}Nl rt�r +�J ,Iddmr&.UL',?io �VaINIwA ewf ArFffmmv WNOnd i°L°°wh fif 11 nA+ Clnrfficirr"n c .u�i �wr�a+'d, �r ebff I7jI4: IfO Afl'wjuiaRf fff SP virw-I av-.r '4 oIrdl Pvr!�° WIfAIfr lifibiraY �' ifrit.'� C AwphrNgy Eftoffirrf RNJ CrAfm Y&CLII°I.PHI WiYlond Naars Sirwinrr P':r1a CM far (•'aMwrrdrf Vrn PL,MnMY) 001YlfapUlf W :'�vc o .':NI ti? 'L_.%;L .7Z .I rill G.X ®.1C Sftl CA, I lw-grgT °m ktL+%rpt:a:le No1Apal knL:6 -uN :kl VDlca IL FJra#'1FfY:ti�r kL3arar� °°R Weiland Communs Summary 62- C31- i-9?-rJu` Coli-wein elm EVysi ,ro va Hign 39 PFU 1 A TIG8 t r I ilnd�I�rda.ra! rrf� tralYtsl 1'roiwition flatirm tt^ I j5wecl MJl�adah° 0 j - Hilgh-eyl Werlap3d Raff2a 3.'0 i3.i0 WrIghgod Awmgyi Areyage WOVAOW MY R adf MjV Rgring "-.1) C.0 -:I A, '4C- '.pp mnI-AA 74E*d! Y, fpldlk:l12U, ZL--d :�k:qr 1 zI 1 I-Vedand Fuii Monal Assessment Summary ,Yf pen a It! Or -qAtftfffflr Pfwl?4clnpf .H.rI:rrofv.Kfv Sorwwgre WITW waw VjLulh*,Hv IN Iv -- I 10 1 R*30ime Ammuaffoft !2J4 P dayrr"wfMIT L* L V- . 1,2m' E- J. q -D Rilel.!j-u DQU.. U-TrcsL ofidl= c.fi jmq, Jvppjjja;r. rAl D C.33 C.30 LOIA kik--)--7.� I -W Ncl fip:Akatk A ffil'idonal lHfj4MOojg MAdwrAwuEv qj Afedxwwnre Pf AcriANRY; il It4lWillmy ,Ukjwrorwfc rio QF OW&II-fi4ic JY MTO Od R/ &10 ffj&;� r;A-.-, ILI 0&fLln.Ijw&&r Sit) FM W*11- K Whye NO 6 (.,k4w)Mvfv AMPOWM Fd&:.i3fb?.V was? R fjy,%Tff.,) u p I and b*= Ya&-sdffierlf WiOmd.Vzme S hwin?v FW fl-k-h Lm r C u V"D lwm cif, I Il p"erlyivy N&FA Z h F 1A I I_:CIF,. 4 D_u V.0 C. 5D I: W DAD C7b nmDn Cew. Nlug A4lAppca:4n Mal A11AAA- 7H liLl Aj 1: k:q I 1,w I,Ve-tlawd Cominunhu Summapy V l+'akxd.IvuMe Lawfim CNEKA PL-WE—LAPIS rr Hv-ln 23 OrmigeR Arromplar I:.&jew?jSaqjr f4r& C.'ri"WK 0 re- u &yr � ld III f I ype 2 Pleel I I Weii�hrod Wivichwo; HkWst Are—gr Awraqo commignify J$-'Offi ?Jd Rarbig AfffiNg lVerimid fl-fflolu4i WaW"4 R wliu k, 0.1 0.", 0 J., 0 In 11--lRy. %igron 20. 2col � Np "1 04 Wedand Fun ianal sr7eJsmeni Summa T YaU I MJJ a FI Cf .ffii°m oJL6nia F ai Roo& L%WjLlrriwk, 4f Wi?,iafrd N'�S�ler�rl ok'aan�+ ';}r?�rl�es'irr�rv�eJluadr�p} Yl drrlggea -Srorri-s '✓:T' Warer 'IV"M A LkiVffH0 rt��rnle A;Ycmuad o?r Qiialvrr { rrm'J4• 1PdC4Ci5C�rfl JL, WE —LAND vF![I :1Si.�LFI7.ylli+ei �Ji ; �V3'xlnkl5 a c.�kl; r} :ix otl�' . wt I[u F�p}7pi}.I} s C.13 u.l l C.}C i I4'I rlPy c UU l l Lary Lcjh I I m NalAa--R-'tk rfda?rn;t�! brIro�rn�aePir+r� I .!I�fFdddY'ALSAC'd o'i�fT�f.?!CJ4�d1�1F of •Lrr2 rtrJl y.'"� k [ rl Ydndi 1-.i Nik id.? r14LL-!-I iid f'A,srmGlcmde Ufh'14kVMMLO4�F CArMdYrzrdie R homes` rr!,rfA•�• Ikalalld &. A i!rnv irerrar fi7(irmw jkr WiFUfifrMUM CAV=rdrufr ri.MtWN&AI Rdmifta-iz-, 1+f.-. �-r IirCYf3ar��d sdu71'r!tinh f�aadmmd+r� Wff4Jf d i1-%x4F Srrfwrnee Fuh fjA6%W fiff w d k6k.wl Corr many A•'uy fif,0�1 ,L4`�afi+p,�deddr 'erdy v:NEKAPI %VF-Aj'.` ram G4 r.:'. UAC 0LI) carb11;lIn I.C4 LM—:-arA. I I^c'P-KL Lv.y rtirrHM.AsgId'j:k L�r7 �� i s Gp:k�1= ?k#A,FA1_ra.0 k%.•:yvyz r�'�rxceuer��1' s owardlej Cr4-;skP phff Ar l4'f+rlwrr !W rr d" rd tt{r r C'�usrF03lcWiriM I J# OrOPPROV I OW-KA'._'NETLAND 1 2-7M--P1-47401 la km!p I-xa_-2- Fr_sF•;5"lar r 170", m Oprdedoey imeompdvfo CpjPj4jarj?jhr dam, f'}crlfaal�l cnurrrdarfolj,r Wazip2d' 14&Md wpeffind PtDpf?rYdfdlq Rating kmebw Radmp Raling I ¢ L1 Q.1r 0.1L Lu o Lrw CAI F4d l:!�ah T° 1 fro '... --r�,ekl q. Ur .•'cr 5, 22-6 �F'tr�ea� h�pm� N Ragaamprp�nrr+ °,• Vwftr+Nrfdr Whin FI'Arer 'kff" 6eph. Aex1.kve -tffra6rrr+s°ii 12?fmhey eirl frr+Tf11G.4°fir rNFK6 Hl _W--TL-V,L L Dq.1Xb ulpil ICOr IW41;= faDDI i A, idt l wtj iculelij. ;3p3�?-rl, O.v 4.v A.7- i7I;to°C :■AId"e FL!jh k°a�jCral. -I �, :; Oral_ Hn a .I I xUk �'�irid!aai fia f�'r��f1 ++ °'4 &MJNea a rydl rl6 4f #y� ek-0-f4pi.. Aia1h1' uv 4F'65t1il M8f i'ruai7r�jri :1 16°nAr �ii<A rrN�il'Y7A4CiP R,'� CA a eu CJ'owl C. IN fdlYfr Ma6ftf PerrlM1P.IfMI ♦ FOIIM6 - if �-*NJ ra lfinOm L' 0fCv SfOFM kWfr L41arnrJr°HAle JLu ph?hhw WafundName ,J"onre L'dwar a7ri 0:67.1r Rnvofemu attd r:r+6a+r Yrejab*N perk ffirsAW Ifffhera CNIMM C11r1.ShiY5-.4m10:1" be.Lrbfti+n poffArraJ 04EVjpp.wrM Nr46 _ JL7 0.0 41.M ;iA:' Git:"° Hx'zrY°A ]f1G. u;l P..-44 P..-4PA-"-ak 1%01AJOi^Mtil7 VCP:VILIX rgxk �k %"I b�JK*k• 4/ WA 4.I:S�:IX High W;Akrj Welland Communj Summary �'r�rarl�u�ei� �'�L�rrnddla L7wamldAram � oametair I C�Srx;vkfrfirrlr (MMty GNEKA DL VA; 1 : AK19 _ W-Ur I. .^C•I Hr? 1I r; —: a '_� Frasr ;Mel' k1ek0Jaw I alb"6:e. M=11 ao° role A vcraxe AN-ergire Wizdand CaNtlrgar,I iiy w° ,rkrlaj Woffgad R-'erir-rid hdr u rrMiju y P21Mk flacin, OL4je Ralim'g I X it Flh him r'�)I Potr kor .. ��� ��:•E'9dI1' ��+H•I6Y5'Fd50M1 Of I#`-kmLr IF'jII N75� �i" d4T# dP WrftW0 alx u hall U(kIVf '•.- .5'�'rrrrtr aF[5FF Mwee W6 r„ • Shordine ,ViiIVifRb f'YtiL. °L gFr•L}f' S�1EtJT -'tp°a i:r_ kvl Ixs.-h•:r ■_I, � ;i°I ii-I }-tkl; n+# rem en:i+='r:k A1TCAIialY&A, �namu. 11R Pro.] ,y-y Iris,7nd ma Fju hnCUF lar5 a�yR 1 0} {.G1 i�'1 P r..:r:- I Fgh %.%kkff.IH H oli H!I'i N x•1 l IvRinfrnaam e g '� � 'N { i`w '�aP�PJ4�i"e1r r hfLunfallnm e q IrAnraLviFrfLfP44 M21mPonana. air {'AWn.4Mnad'r Arsfkcft Herrean'Luaf di•i '+fNPda'r�ofzevRwr�.en'r .YLi� ffAwm! �+flc tmr.IFst Lb'rufaltd�V r ..,1 1 mrnnd $Rifommon 4fmafe}fakNai lrdr h'Amaifar flaa {'ulYq i'aaxqurmriaP�'rrrt +�vearaurrncl�- ry #ntd®f pndPfVitjnle-lmaef ,.h4FtAF'4.RE'1.4i:f :Iran ,dA tt-uj dAnrfaFnlaul „ti+arrh I Ika1 41rAic 4 RAN C G} 0: C.S.H:II'f'a r,t:I f+p7lkahL- hic�=°ax HyII -I�- Wetland Communift,,-gummary �F's��rrRat;'�,�rrar�rd,loatRlcrar�ra .��'ralelar�rt {ICI PL_�FF}�C59HNT 9c �'r.l•'1C171M.2 Frssh pI� alb F;a^r. v Z Dej,fjh#y tt 0a"tPlemva?,'rdhViro,iIi dpfir. T-+!may, .'.1gr.. I '.0. ",r19 p9 fa&vid'wi Ifighesf AI'►:rrr4!1 Avetalvd' 1? BkYfahl! JJ AiPfre d7�lraj{ RafMld f lRal ng 1.7P A -11y4t 7 r.' I Welland Functional Assessment Summaq ivilhir, lifiNce wifireflunry d .If wokAw Xydrg�.7jr �? 14d?jt4' Wort SA,"YJ[np R I We I 11, il ejj1 I ghwilly 0*Af;1j f+a tko 0 xi Kr, P _eo 2 rLa K n F IN:, mikur. 1-1!e: and 3.dv.t�Cill1.44 5 f. A U. ]Lb 1161 lr M 1A I a" Lair 140t 1%p p &- aN a AM&IMO fkf"athm Iva I ri eh 11 a VYjn fi! n il H ox of -ChdMCf&F?4k Gm m I I d' Wf4trd (A *ffRF "RhY YlujmHarfv C.0 anu rz nq ly.2 roLlaphipfon `IhY&jad.A;ump LomrMorl; Woo Romomilorr herd tlbml FrEdoftwe Pikh MOM6e qaDifor C00"Mr Copunierdirl Lr;,?i InWwfi%-ty Poiregki! CbM X"Ab 'X+-rVk F— WOETL4.ND )LU =e .1 C.Cre U. Ic =&I lia 9. Lei ny AMAINI-W �kAAp p ImA I.x r4j'. —x5uHij N Him AIk:di:4+- 'ixkrLLk- 11'efiand Communfit Summary CID vd,4co f w m r i: t; i .7- Arnowx Onrompleo, ralcu4Mrm drora, 1poltdfuive 49 CY Indii-idlyqf Hoghw OrmbriPtand PVW.Wnd CtommunRy Wothwd - 99 itluffimuoty(y PiTiproMmY Rojing KW&Ar I YpA P I FreSj (Wt!-.1 F&--a&A c4mmudly A 1-pruffe. Wobuw Ri2rifly. �. 11) C. 1.1 -.aov - )W. MiLrsh`rD,0)10 pc:c-� - 01 - We, fg h 14-d Average wof [land an rmg 4/26/2018 Gmail - Oneka Place Joint Application MG mi l Ken Meek <esa332@gmail.com> Oneka Place Joint Application 1 message Tony Havranek <THavranek@wsbeng.com> Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 5:53 AM To: "esa332@gmail.com" <esa332@gmail.com>, Dan Seemon <denad@frontiernet.net>, "David. Hem pel@westwoodps.com" <David. Hem pel@westwood ps.com> Cc: "ben.meyer@state.mn.us" <ben.meyer@state.mn.us>, "Jay Riggs (JRiggs@mnwcd.org)" <JRiggs@mnwcd.org>, "RJuba@ci.hugo.mn.us" <RJuba@ci.hugo.mn.us>, Stephanie Hatten <SHatten@wsbeng.com> Ken, Below are my comments and request for edits/updates to the joint application and supporting docs. Rather than draft another addendum, and since I have not noticed the application yet, can you please update/edit the joint application? This will make things much clearer and easier to track for myself and others that are or may be involved. I think we had a good meeting yesterday and since we (WSB) have done much of the wetland review already, we should be good to go from a timeline perspective. 1. Please update the aquatic resource impact table (part 4 of the joint application) to reflect the correct amount of impact, correct watershed, and correct BSA #. 2. Take a look at attachment C, second paragraph, last sentence. I think you may need to update this. 3. As required under MN Rule 8420.0520, you must provide at least 2 alternatives that avoid all wetland impacts, one of which may be the no -build. I think your alternative location search would work for this, just couch it under the sequencing/avoidance section in attachment C. Since it appears that most of the wetland resources you propose to impact are degraded, they should be eligible for sequencing flexibility; with the exception of wetland L. For wetland L, you will need to provide one alternative that avoids any impact. That doesn't need to be the preferred alternative, but if you reject this alternative, you must provide a rationale based on Mn Rule 8420.0520 subpt. C. Remember that economic considerations alone do not make an alternative not feasible or prudent. 4. You did a good job on minimization, just slide that into attachment C-minimization. 5. You will need to have some discussion in your application that addresses each of the items in MN Rule 8420.0515- special considerations. You may need to either rely on the corps review under 106 to get this info or complete a NHIS review. As Rachel mentioned there may be a city AUAR that you may be able to get that information from as well. 6. You should request sequencing flexibility for all wetland impacts with the exception of wetland L. Please include a discussion that addresses MN Rule 8420.0520 subp. 7a. Please include a functional assessment of the replacement wetland so we have that documentation. 7. The addendum indicates that 0.91 acres of wetlands will be impacted. At a 2.5:1 replacement ratio that should be 2.28 acres. The addendum indicates 2.23. Please update this in the application and the draft purchase agreement. 8. The assessment report page, 1, section 2.0, second paragraph indicates impacts to 6 wetland sites; shouldn't this be 7? 9. In the assessment report section 3.0, the St Croix river basin is referenced, but this should be MS River -Twin cities #20. Also, please update the BSA and watershed in the MN RAM assessment sheets. Ben requested a discussion on the road in the SW portion of the site that indicates future expansion of this section of road will not result in future wetland impacts. Dave pointed out that if the road is extended, it will utilize the upland area to the south and west rather than be planned to extend into the large wetland complex to the west. Also, we discussed the existing easement on the eastern portion of the site. This easement will not necessarily be vacated, rather it will be modified. Both of these items could be added to part 3 of the joint application. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=2&ik=82f6O75fl a&jsver=OeNArYUPo4g.en.&view=pt&search=inbox&th=162f74a0126ab045&siml=162f74a0126ab045 4/26/2018 Gmail - Oneka Place Joint Application Thinking about drafting the NOD, I may have something in there about installing level loggers in a few of the basins to document that hydrology is maintained. Once I have the revised, complete application, I will notice it. Thanks, Ken, Tony Havranek Sr. Environmental Scientist P (651) 286-8473 1 M (612) 246-9346 WSB & Associates, Inc. 1 178 East 9th Street, Suite 200 1 St. Paul, MN 55101 AL `nfr aFIRM This email, and any files transmitted with it, is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you are not the addressee, please delete this email from your system. Any use of this email by unintended recipients is strictly prohibited. WSB does not accept liability for any errors or omissions which arise as a result of electronic transmission. If verification is required, please request a hard copy. https://mail.google.com/mail/u/O/?ui=2&ik=82f6O75f1 a&jsver=OeNArYUPo4g.en.&view=pt&search=inbox&th=162f74a0126ab045&siml=162f74a0126ab045 Oneka Place Wetland Comparison Drainage Area (ac) Inflow Rate (cfs) 2-year Drainage Volume (ac-ft) 2-year Drainage Volume (ac-ft)100-year 2-Year HWL 100-Year HWL Wetland Type Dominant Vegetation Wetland Bottom Elevation Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Existing Proposed Existing Proposed A 914 4.31 2.28 5.08 4.57 0.39 0.24 1.73 0.98 914.4 914.4 914.6 914.54 Type 2 RCG B 913.5 20.62 31.88 15.02 8.82 1.69 3.16 7.88 13.62 914.03 913.93 914.45 914.22 Type 2 RCG C 925.5 7.16 5.65 Type 2 RCG D 912 21.32 14.17 11.05 4.3 1.36 0.92 7.19 3.79 912.48 912.35 912.98 912.61 Type 2 RCG G 930 3.90 1.76 4.01 3.17 0.32 0.17 1.49 0.72 931.44 931.05 932.12 931.81 Type 2 RCG H 920.2 6.23 1.31 Type 2 RCG 1 919 5.87 3.79 4.26 5.62 0.48 0.37 2.24 1.56 919.34 919.36 919.61 919.63 Type 2 RCG K/L 916 81.54 84.09 13.12 13.27 3.98 4.98 19.67 22.59 916.55 916.56 917.12 917.12 Type 2 RCG/Slough sedge M 918 2.99 3.03 T e 1/7 Green ash/box elder/elm P 917.5 7.61 7.09 1 IType 7 1 Green ash/box elder/elm 918.57 *Wetland F is being removed Combined with Wetland E RESERVATION/QUOTE AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF WETLAND BANK CREDITS This Reservation/Quote Agreement is dated and effective May 25, 2018 (the "Effective Date") by and between Mader Farm, LLC ("Seller') and David Hempel - Westwood ('Buyer"). RFr..ITAI C A. Seller is the owner of the wetland banking credits described below (the "Credits") located in Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Hennepin County, Bank Service Area 7. B. The Credits are deposited in an account in the Minnesota Wetland Bank administered by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources ("BWSR") under Minnesota Rules Sections 8420.0700 et seq. NOW THEREFORE, Seller and Buyer agree as follows: 1. Identification of Credits. The Credits that are the subject matter of this Agreement are described as follows: CREDITS Credit Sub- Federally Wetland s Topo. Number of Price Per 1 Authorized Wetland Plant Community Type 4 Acres / Cost Group Credits? Type' Setting Credits Credit A. Yes 4 Deep Marsh Flow -through 1.6183 87120 $140,986.30 B. Yes 3 Shallow Marsh Flow -through 0.2017 87120 $17,572.10 C. Yes 2 Fresh Wet Meadow Flow -through 0.0000 0 $0.00 D. 0.0000 0 $0.00 E. 0.0000 0 $0.00 Total Purchase Price Payable to: Mader Farm, LLC 1.8200 $158,558.40 Per Credit Withdrawal (Withdrawal Fee x total Credits equals amount due) 1.8200 $1,992.00 $3,625.44 Fee BSA 7 Easement Stewardship (Easement Stewardship Fee x total Credits equals amount due) 1.8200 $302.00 $549.64 Fee Total Fees Payable to: $4,175.08 Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources ❑ Check here if additional credit sub -groups are part of this account and are listed on an attachment to this document. A separate credit sub -group shall be established for each wetland or wetland area that has different wetland characteristics. Z Circular 39 types: 1, 1L, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, B, U s Wetland Plant Community types: shallow, open water; deep marsh; shallow marsh; sedge meadow; fresh wet meadow; wet to wet mesic prairie; calcareous fen; open bog or coniferous bog; shrub carr or alder thicket; hardwood swamp or coniferous swamp; floodplain forest; seasonally flooded basin. Wetland Plants and Plant Communities of Minnesota and Wisconsin, Eggers and Reed, 1997. 4 Typographic setting types: shoreland, reverine, floodplain, flow -through, tributary, isolated, upland. Quotation or Reservation . Buyer desires to (check applicable box): A. 0 Obtain a quote from Seller on the estimated price for the Credits. ❑ Reserve the Credits for purchase by Buyer on the terms and conditions hereinafter set forth. 3. Quotation. If Box 2.A. is checked, this form constitutes an estimate and quotation by Seller to Buyer as to the price and cost of the Credits. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that Seller is not reserving the Credits for purchase by or transfer to Buyer, and Seller is free to sell the Credits described on this form to another buyer at any time on any terms and conditions acceptable to Seller in Seller's sole and absolute discretion. The price estimated by Seller is not guaranteed and if Buyer purchases the Credits the price may be higher or lower. 4. Reservation. If Box 2.13. is checked, Seller agrees to hold the Credits for purchase by Buyer for a period of 90 days from the Effective Date. In consideration of Seller's agreement to reserve the Credits for Buyer, Buyer, upon execution of this Agreement, shall pay to Seller a payment (the "Reservation Payment") in the amount of $ (Not Applicable) . Seller agrees to reserve and hold the Credits for purchase by Buyer until 11:59 p.m. on (Not Applicable) (the "Expiration Date"). On or prior to the Expiration Date, Buyer may deposit an additional Reservation Payment in the amount of (Not Applicable) with Seller to extend the Expiration Date for an additional 90 days to (Not Applicable) (the "Extended Expiration Date"). Such extension is valid only upon Seller's receipt of the additional Reservation Payment and Seller's confirmation in writing of the extension. If Buyer does not complete the purchase of the Credits by payment of the full purchase price for the Credits (the Total Purchase Price Payable to Seller) on or before the Expiration Date, or the Extended Expiration Date, if applicable, Buyer's reservation of the Credits is terminated, of no further force or effect, and Seller is free to sell or transfer the Credits to another buyer, or reserve the Credits for the benefit of another buyer in Seller's sole and absolute discretion. Upon receipt by Seller, the Reservation Payment and any additional Reservation Payment shall be deemed earned by Seller, shall be Seller's sole and absolute property, and shall not be refunded or repaid to Buyer in any circumstances. The Reservation Payment and any additional Reservation Payment shall apply to the purchase price of the Credits if Buyer completes the purchase of the Credits. Buyer's purchase of the Credits shall be by way of the Purchase Agreement and Bill of Sale for Wetland Bank Credits, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. BUYER: David Hempel - Westwood By Its SELLER: MADER FARM, LLC By David M. Franske Its President and Manager PURCHASE AGREEMENT AND BILL OF SALE FOR WETLAND BANK CREDITS This Purchase Agreement and Bill of Sale is dated and effective 20 by and between Mader Farm, LLC ("Seller") and David Hempel - Westwood ("Buyer"). A. Seller is the owner of the wetland banking credits described below (the "Credits") located in the Minnehaha Creek Watershed District, Hennepin County, Bank Service Area 7. B. The Credits are deposited in an account in the Minnesota Wetland Bank administered by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources ("BWSR") under Minnesota Rules Sections 8420.0700 et seq. C. Seller desires to sell the Credits to Buyer and Buyer desires to purchase the Credits from Seller. NOW, THEREFORE, SELLER AND BUYER AGREE AS FOLLOWS: 1. Identification of Credits. The Credits sold by Seller and purchased by Buyer are the following: CREDITS SOLD TO BUYER Credit Sub- Federally Wetland s Topo. Number of Price Per 1 Authorized Wetland Plant Community Type 4 Acres / Cost Group Credits? Type' Setting Credits Credit A. Yes 4 Deep Marsh Flow -through 1.6183 87120 $140,986.30 B. Yes 3 Shallow Marsh Flow -through 0.2017 87120 $17,572.10 C. Yes 2 Fresh Wet Meadow Flow -through 0 0 $0.00 D. 0 0 $0.00 E. 0 0 $0.00 Total Purchase Price Payable to: Mader Farm, LLC 1.82 $158,558.40 Per Credit Withdrawal (Withdrawal Fee x total Credits equals amount due) 1.82 $1,992.00 $3,625.44 Fee BSA 7 Easement Stewardship (Easement Stewardship Fee x total Credits equals amount due) 1.82 $302.00 $549.64 Fee Total Fees Payable to: $4,175.08 Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources ❑ Check here if additional credit sub -groups are part of this account and are listed on an attachment to this document. A separate credit sub -group shall be established for each wetland or wetland area that has different wetland characteristics. Z Circular 39 types: 1, 1L, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, B, U a Wetland Plant Community types: shallow, open water; deep marsh; shallow marsh; sedge meadow; fresh wet meadow; wet to wet mesic 4 Typographic setting types: shoreland, reverine, floodplain, flow -through, tributary, isolated, upland. 2. Sale of Credits. In consideration of Buyer's payment to Seller in the amount of the Total Purchase Price Payable to Seller set forth in the table in Paragraph 1, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Seller hereby transfers the Credits to Buyer to have and to hold the same unto Buyer, its successors and assigns, forever. Buyer hereby accepts the transfer of the Credits. 3. Representations and Warranties. Seller represents and warrants that: (i) Seller has good and marketable title to the Credits, free and clear of all liens, security interests, charges or encumbrances; and (ii) Seller will warrant and defend the transfer of the Credits to Buyer against any person claiming any interest therein. 4. BWSR Fees. Buyer acknowledges and agrees that the Total Fees Payable to BWSR set forth in the table in Paragraph 1 are the responsibility of Buyer to be paid to BWSR for transfer and withdrawal of the Credits. Seller shall not be responsible for payment of any fees to BWSR in connection with the transfer and/or withdrawal of the Credits. 5. Additional Documents. Seller agrees to cooperate with Buyer in completing and signing BWSR's Transaction Form to Withdraw Credits, and any other forms required by BWSR for transfer of the Credits to Buyer and withdrawl of the Credits from the Minnesota Wetland Bank program, all at no cost to Seller. Buyer: David Hempel - Westwood By Its Seller: Mader Farm, LLC By Its Bidders List R-010893-000 Owner: City of Hugo, MN Project Description: Oneka Lake Boulevard and Harrow Avenue Street Improvement Project (S.A.P. 224-104-005 / City Engineer: Mark Erichson, PE 224-122-002) - 0 0 ,, 0o leb FoIA ago °j o�o-41W ma�tia� �o��aa �c 0FQ y�e D U 0 d oC 6 a�R �0 0'0 �ca`�o Qaa0 o�Q'�o �`sa�ma mgQo J��om 0 0`aa � 0 Vm Contractor Count: 8 Bid Date: 5/2412018 Bid Time: 10:00 a.m. Local Time Read By: Recorded By: Contractor Grand Total Bid Arnt Construction Company, Inc. N/A Asphalt Surface Technologies Corporation (ASTECH Corp.) N/A Midwest Asphalt Services N/A North Valley, Inc. N/A ;j i✓' t/ 76V Northdale Construction Company, Inc. N/A Northwest Asphalt, Inc. N/A Park Construction Company N/A T.A. Schifsky & Sons, Inc. N/A� Page 1 of 1 T K:1010893-00014dminlConstruction Adminl R-010893-000 CST Bidders List-052418-srb. THURSDAY JUNE 7TH Spin - 10pm...................................................Lions Kitchen 5pm - lOpm................................................. Carnival Rides 5pm - tOpm.................................................... Beer Garden 7pm-10pm......................................................... Karaoke FRIDAY TUNE ST11 5pm -10pm ...................................................Lions Kitchen 5pm -12am................................................. Carnival Rides 5pm -12am.................................................... Beer Garden 5pm - 7pm............................................. MGM Wine Tasting 6pm - lOpm....................................... Army Obstacle Course 10pm - Midnight ......................................... Wise Guys Pizza 8pm - Midnight ...................Band: Good For Gary $5.00 Cover SATUR`DA.Y JU1 E 9TH TBA ..........................................Hugo Historical Commission TBA .......... Hugo Fire Dept/Wash Cty Emergency Management: Vehicle Extraction/Emergency Preparedness Check in at 8am starts at 9am....................... Technicolor Run 9am Line up Begins, Parade Starts at !lam ................. Parade $25.00 preregister,$50.00 day of 10am-i0pm....................................................Lions Kitchen 10am - 8pm....................................... Army Obstacle Course 10am - 6pm.................................... Petting Zoo/Pony Rides Upm - 7pm.................................................... Bonker Ball 11am - Runs Out ................. Bloody Mary Bar by Sagers Liquor Energy® �- KERSTEN'S AUTO SALES 11am -7pm............................................. Trout Fishing Pondl 11am-12am.................................................. Carnival Rides! 1Zpm - 12am................................................... Beer Garden; 12:00 - 4:00............................................. Baron of Bubbles! 12pm- 3pm..................................................... Lions Bingo; 12pm - 3pm................................................. Lions KidSightj 12pm - 7pm..................................................... Bonker Ball', 5pm - 7pm............................................. MGM Wine Tasting' 9:30pm -10:00........................Grundhofer's Fireworks Showi 8pm - Midnight ................... Devon Worley Band $5.00 Cover 10pm - Midnight ......................................... Wise Guys Pizza SUNDAY JUNE yQTH TBA ..........................................Hugo Historical Commission, 8am -1lam .............................. Boy -Scout Pancake Breakfast 11am - 4pm....................................................Lions Kitchen 11am - Runs Out ................. Bloody Mary Bar by Sagers Liquor 12pm - 3pm.................................... Petting Zoo/Pony Rides' 12pm - 4pm..................................................... Bonkerball 12pm -4pm............................................ Trout Fishing Pond 12pm -4pm.................................................. Carnival Rides 12pm -4pm........................................ Army Obstacle Course 12pm - 4pm.................................................... Beer Garden 1pm- 4pm....................................................... Lions Bingo 3pm - 4pm ....... Joseph & The Amazing Technicolor Dreamcoat 4pm .................. Closing Ceremony Scholarships & Raffle Drawings G_� _%SCHWIET�ERS T ni"crcN. iNc. WC3C31_ 6., .a .orenson \\ rooms DENTAL �1 ,de purchase o =1 � o unliml�ed �9N mival fidesHoi'nfay Smhon, Nu9 Advanced tide pas e 4 at Bald Ea91e Qu-ck time passes are valid StoP� May ?5th — gagers LiQuor. The one Saturday and Sunday staffing ion PoSt #620 and t;fn -4pm . hpor Days American m mursday and Friday and fr during Good Ne�9 from 5- P in advance and $25.00 k ` ■ �20.00 �I ■ a Renewal L, M..., )-- RECOGNIZING 7'fl E- VOLUNTEERS WHO HELPED OUR COMMUNITY AFTER THE MAY 25th, 2008 TORNADO June 2018 June 2018 July 2018 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu Wee Th Fr Sa 1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY May 27 28 29 30 31 Jun 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Good Neiqhbor Days 9 7:00pm City Council Meeting 10 Good Neiqhbor Days 11 12 13 14 6:30pm BOZA 7:00pm Planning Commission 15 16 7:00pm CA Review (Hugo Council Chambers) 17 18 19 5:00pm EDA Meets 20 LMC 7:00pm Parks 21 22 23 Fathers Da 6:00pm Gravel Rd Workshop (Hugo Council Chambers Annual Conference . S(_t. CloudL— 7:00pm City Council Meeting 24 25 26 27 28 6:30pm BOZA 29 30 5:00pm Burger Night (Hugo Legion) 7:00pm Planning Commisison Michele Lindau 1 5/31/2018 1:43 PM July O July August 2018 Su Mo Tu Wea Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 2 3 4 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 29 30 31 26 27 28 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Jul 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 7:00pm City Council Independence Da Meeting 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 6:30pm BOZA 7:00pm Planning Commission 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 5:00pm EDA Meets 7:00pm Parks 7:00pm City Council Meeting 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 5:00pm Burger Night 6:30pm BOZA (Hugo Legion) 7:00pm Planning Commisison 29 30 31 Aug 1 2 3 4 Michele Lindau 2 5/31/2018 1:43 PM