Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Packet 03.28.19AGENDA HUGO PLANNING COMMISSION THURSDAY, MARCH 28, 2019 HUGO CITY HALL 7:00 p.m. A. ROLL CALL (Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Luchsinger, Mulvihill, Tjernlund) B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. February 28, 2019 D. PUBLIC HEARING 1. MWF Properties Request for a Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for Rosemary Apartments. E. NEW BUSINESS Golden Valley Land Company Sketch Plan Review for The Meadows at Hugo. F. OLD BUSINESS G. ADJOURNMENT If you need accommodations for the Planning Commission meeting please contact Rachel Juba at (651) 762-6304 or riuba(&ci.hugo.mn.us, thank you. Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of Thursday, February 28, 2019 Chair Kleissler called the meeting to order at 7:01 p.m. PRESENT: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Luchsinger, Mulvihill, Tjemlund. ABSENT: Lessard. STAFF: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant Approval of Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of January 24, 2018 Commissioner Derr made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Tjernlund, to approve minutes for the meeting of January 24, 2018. All Ayes. Motion carried. Public Hearing — Amendments to Right-of-way and Telecommunications Ordinance to Regulate Small Wireless Facilities Weber provided background on the Right-of-way (ROW) and Telecommunications Ordinances and why amendments need to be made. The City's public ROW is the area along City streets and is usually ten feet from the edge of the road. The City has a ROW ordinance so they can properly manage the public ROW and any ROW user, including the small wireless facility providers. A small wireless facility is a newer technology that is a complimentary piece of equipment to traditional cell towers and provides additional cellular data coverage for wireless carriers. Facilities are small enough to be mounted on existing structures such as light poles and power lines, which are often found in the public ROW. The antenna and all exposed elements of the small wireless facility can fit within an enclosure of no more than six cubic feet. Small wireless facilities work in a network meaning multiple facilities are needed within a two mile radius and are usually placed in a line, often how you see utility poles. Weber stated that staff made revisions to the ROW ordinance that requires a permit for anyone wanting to install a wireless support structure or to collocate a small wireless facility in the ROW. No permit is necessary to conduct routine maintenance of a small wireless facility or to replace a facility of the same size and design. Weber also went through the conditions that will apply to small wireless facility permits. Staff recommended approval of the proposed text amendments to the City Code and recommended opening a public hearing to take any and all comments. Commissioner Fry asked for clarification on what kind of control the City has over the installation of new wireless support structures and stated his concern with the amount of structures that could potentially be installed. Weber responded by stating the height limitations and design guidelines for new wireless support structures as well as stating that the City can impose reasonable separation requirements between new structures and existing structures in the ROW. Juba went on to clarify that the State Statute limits what Cities can and cannot do, making the regulations for small wireless facilities limited. Chair Kleissler opened the public hearing at 7:15pm Chair Kleissler closed the public hearing at 7:15pm. Planning Commission February 28, 2019 Page 2 Chair Kleissler opened the discussion with the commissioners and staff. Commissioner Derr opened the discussion by addressing how utilities are accounted for with small wireless facilities in use. Weber clarified that utility companies will provide electricity to the small wireless facilities and that should additional electric transmission boxes be required the City could require screeing. Juba also stated that the fees seen in the amendments to the right-of-way ordinance were set by State Statute. Commissioner Arcand then followed by asking if there was a calculated projection for future costs also set by the State and Juba responded that there is not. Commissioner Luchsinger asked if the City has received any requests or permits for small wireless facilities. Juba stated that the City has not received any applications however, Verizon Wireless is interested in meeting with the City of Hugo to inquire about the use of small wireless facilities. Chair Kleissler asked if staff had compared the proposed ordinance amendments to surrounding cities. Weber responded by saying that the ordinance amendments are very similar to neighboring communities and that the application fees are similar as well. Commissioner Derr wanted clarification on abandoned facilities and Weber stated that abandoned facilities are the responsibility of the applicant shall a facility be out of service for a continuous period of six months. The collocation agreement will provide specific requirements for facilities not in use. As a follow up, Chair Kleisser asked how the City will know whether or not a facility is in use and to that Juba responded that the City will have to use its best judgement or to call the company to determine whether or not a facility is in use. Commissioner Fry commented that the applicants will be paying for collocation, which is a way to determine facilities in use. Luchsinger made motion to approve the amendments to Right-of-way and Telecommunications Ordinance to regulate small wireless facilities. Derr seconded. All ayes. Motion carried. Adjournment There is no Planning Commission meeting March 14, 2019 and the next meeting will be on March 28, 2019. Commissioner Arcand made a motion, Commissioner Fry seconded, to adjourn at 7:26 pm. All Ayes. Motion carried. Respectfully Submitted, Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant Agenda Number: D.1 CITY OF HUGO PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Rosemary Apartments — MWF Properties. Site plan and conditional use permit for a three story approximately 80,000 square foot apartment building for the property located north of Rosemary Way and west of Everton Avenue DATE: March 20, 2019, for the Planning Commission meeting of March 28, 2019 ZONING: Medium Density Multiple Family Residential (R-5) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Medium Density Residential (MD) 60 -DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: April 15, 2019 1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The developer is requesting approval of a site plan and conditional use permit (CUP) for a three story approximately 80,000 square foot apartment building (including underground parking lot) for the property located north of Rosemary Way and west of Everton Avenue. Apartments are allowed in the Medium Density Multiple Family Residential (R-5) with a CUP. The property is 18.15 acres, including several wetlands for a total of 4.6 acres buildable. The density of the project would be ten units per acre, meeting the zoning district regulations. The apartment would be rented to persons or families who earn 60% of the area median income or less. This equates to $45,000 to $65,000 depending on household size. Rents will average $725 for a one -bedroom, $985 for a two-bedroom, and $1,200 for a three-bedroom. The anticipated unit mix is 6 one -bedroom, 18 two-bedroom, and 21 three-bedroom units. 2. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The properties to the north are zoned Agricultural (AG) and are occupied by large lots and single family homes. The property to the east is zoned Medium Density Multiple Family Residential (R-5) and is occupied by Christ Lutheran Church. The properties to the south are zoned General Rosemary Apartments Site Plan and CUP Page 2 Business (C-2) and are vacant. The property to the west is zoned Planned Unit Development is occupied by townhomes. B. Existing Site Characteristics The property is currently vacant and contains several wetlands. The upland of the property was used for stockpiling of dirt, but is normally generally flat. 3. BACKGROUND: The property is part of the Frenchman Place development that was master planned in 2008. There are several lots in the development that were proposed to be a combination of institutional, residential, and commercial uses. The developer at the time, indicated that this lot would be developed at an apartment building. Site plan approval is required for each lot as it develops. The City Council agreed with the approval of the preliminary plat that the proposed lot and building layout, street alignments, and proposed uses functioned properly and fit in with the surrounding areas. The Medium Density Multiple Family Residential (R-5) allows for the expansion and development of medium -density multiple -family uses such as townhouses and apartments where public utilities are present. This district addresses the need for life cycle housing by offering an alternative to single-family detached housing with a standard density between six and ten units per acre and a planned unit development density of six and twelve units per acre. The project meets the density requirements. 4. ANALYSIS: A. Level of City Discretion in Decision -Making The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. The City's discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or not the proposed application meets the standards outlined in the City's Comprehensive Land Use Regulations. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the conditional use permit. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards The applications comply with the ordinance standards as follows: Conditional Use Permit The developer is requesting an apartment use to be allowed on the property. Apartments are allowed in the R-5 zoning district with a conditional use permit. Rosemary Apartments Site Plan and CUP Page 3 The Planning Commission must review the application for a conditional use permit with the standards provided in Section 90-37 of the City Code. Staff used these standards to review the application and found that the request meets all applicable standards as follows: 1. The proposed use is permissible by law. The proposed use is allowed by conditional use permit. 2. The proposed use is keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The proposed use is allowed in the R-5 zoning district and will keep with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, which is intended to allow an apartment building by a CUP as long as they comply with the regulations. 3. The proposed use is compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the character of the surrounding area. The City's Comprehensive Plan guides the land use for the site as Medium Density Residential (MD). The site is located between a commercial area, large lot residential, and a townhome development. The property is part of the Frenchman Place development that was master planned in 2008. There are several lots in the development that were proposed to be a combination of institutional, residential, and commercial uses. The proposed use is compatible with the master plan, the surrounding development, and will not alter the character of the area. 4. The proposed use has adequate drainage, water supply, electrical, gas, and sewage treatment facilities. The proposed use as adequate drainage, water supply, and utilized to the site. 5. The proposed use has adequate road access. The developer is proposing access of Rosemary Way which is designated as a collector street in the City's Comprehensive Plan. 6. Technical Evaluation of Floodplain. The developer is not proposing to impact any floodplain. 7. The proposed use should not increase the potential for flood damage. The proposed use would not obstruct the floodplain or increase the potential for flooding. 8. The proposed use will not damage or reduce the benefits the public receives from public waters. The proposed use would not damage or reduce the benefits from any public waters. Rosemary Apartments Site Plan and CUP Page 4 9. The use of watercraft on public waters. The proposed use would not involve the use of watercraft on public waters. 10. All structures shall be screened from view of public waters. The proposed use would not be visible from public waters. 11. Wetland impacts. The proposed use does impact wetlands. The developer has submitted a wetland replacement plan that has been reviewed by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP). The approval is expected to be on the April 15, 2019, City Council agenda. 12. All state and local permits shall be acquired for the conditional use. The developer would be responsible for obtaining all state and local permits. 13. Adequate screening and buffering from non -compatible uses and public rights-of-way. The proposed use is compatible with the adjacent developments. Landscaping will be installed with the development. It's in staff's opinion that the developer has met the criteria to approve the CUP request. Site Plan The site plan application is for the three story approximately 80,000 square foot apartment building including underground parking. The foot print of the building is 20,616 square feet. The building is located in the middle of the site and the parking lot is on the south side of the building. The access to the site is proposed from Rosemary Way. Building Setbacks The R-5 zoning district requires a 25 -foot front and rear yard setback and a 15 -foot side yard setback. The site plan complies with the setback requirements. Building Height The R-5 zoning district has a maximum building height of 35 feet. They are proposing the height of the building to be 38.5 feet, where 35 feet is required by ordinance therefore a variance is required. The developer has not applied for a variance. Staff has added as a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of a building permit the developer shall lower the height of the building to 35 feet or apply for approval of a variance. Rosemary Apartments Site Plan and CUP Page 5 Building Coverage and Lot Coverage The R-5 zoning district limits maximum lot area to be covered by a building to 40% and maximum lot area to be covered by impervious surface to 70%. The site plan complies with the coverage requirements. Parking The developer is proposing to satisfy the parking requirements with a combination of ground and below ground parking. According to the Section 90-253 PARKING of the City Code, based on the use and the size of the building the total number of parking spaces required is 99. The developer is proposing 99 parking spaces, which meets the ordinance standards. The developer is proposing parking on the south side of the building. The vehicle circulation within the parking lot works well. The developer meets the ordinance standards. Landscaping Section 90-181 of the Zoning Ordinance provides landscaping requirements for developments. The site plan includes tree and shrub locations and species. The ordinance provides two ways of calculating the required amount of trees and shrubs. One based on the square footage of the building and one based on the perimeter of the site, whichever is greater. In order to meet the landscape requirements, 45 overstory deciduous trees, 45 coniferous trees, 42 ornamental trees, and 140 shrubs are required to be installed. The developer is proposing 62 overstory deciduous trees, 41 coniferous trees, 42 ornamental trees, and 140 shrubs. The developer is substituting 4 of the required coniferous trees with 17 overstory deciduous shade trees. It's in staff's opinion that this is a good substitution. Not only does the developer exceed the number of shrubs that are required overall, they are providing several additional ornamental grasses and perennials. The number of trees and shrubs meet intent the landscape ordinance. Although the landscape plan meets the ordinance in regards to counts, the developer shall revise the landscape plan to comply with the following: 1. Landscaping shall be added to the north side of the building to screen the proposed condensers. 2. The developer shall provide staff with planting details for landscaping proposed on the slopes of the property. Staff will continue to work with the developer on revisions to the landscape plan. The developer is proposing the ground cover to be seeded with grass and the property will be irrigated. Rosemary Apartments Site Plan and CUP Page 6 Lighting The ordinance requires lighting to consist of cut-off fixtures. Light cast on adjacent property and roads is not to exceed '/2 foot candle measured at the property line or I foot candle measured at the street's centerline. The developer is proposing pole mounted cut-off light fixtures within the parking lot area. The developer is also proposing wall mounted downcast cut-off light fixtures on the building. The developer has provided examples of cut sheet for the lights, but has not decided on a final product to install. Shields will be required on the proposed lights to reduce glare. Prior to the installation, the pole and wall mounted fixtures will need to be reviewed and approved by staff. Fencing and Screening The developer is not proposing any fencing at this time. If fencing is proposed in the future, the location and type shall be reviewed and approved by staff. The developer is not showing the location of any roof top mechanical equipment. The ground mounted is proposed on the north side of the building. Landscaping shall be added to the north side of the building to screen the proposed condensers. The trash enclosure is proposed to be interior to the building on the west side. Streets and Access The development as adequate access from Rosemary Way. Trails/Sidewalks There are sidewalks along both sides of Rosemary Way. The developer is showing a sidewalk connection at Rosemary Way that goes north to the property. There is a sidewalk along the front of the building. The Comprehensive Plan does not show any proposed trails through the site. There are no trails proposed with the development. Building Architecture In 2005, the City Council adopted the Multi -Family Design Guidelines and the developer has provided building elevations and a building rendering for review. The majority of the building will include cement board siding and shake siding, with accents of rock face block and cast stone along the bottom, at the main entrance, and building corners. There is a good color variation in the design. There seems to be a difference in the material colors on the sample board of the colors shown on the building elevations. Staff will continue to work with the developer on the building material colors. There will be a stone sill along the top of the stone as the material transitions to cement board siding. The windows and doors will Rosemary Apartments Site Plan and CUP Page 7 include a white color frame around the edges and some windows include a header at the top. The architecture includes a pitched roof with asphalt shingles. The building has horizontal and vertical projections, which are encouraged by the Multi -Family Design Guidelines. The sides of the building are broken up by the projections, windows, and color variation. The peaked roof sections could be wider to create a more balanced design, as they are tall and skinny and widening them will help breakup the facade of the building. The main entrance is on the south side of the building and includes a significant amount of cast stone and a canopy with pillars, creating a clear main entrance. Staff recommends that cast stone be added to the pillars for a more cohesive design. The developer has done a good job of wrapping the cast stone around the corners of the building with the corner design elements. The design guidelines state that buildings should be designed with high quality materials on all sides of the building, consisting of stone and similar materials. There are window headers on some of the windows on the 1St floor and where they are shown headers could be added to the 2nd and Yd floors to add balance and interest to the building. The north elevation (back of the building) seems to be missing some of the architectural details, such as widow headers and cast stone material the rest of the building includes. Staff recommends that the developer add architectural elements and add the cast stone, to the north elevation to match the other elevations of the building. Staff will continue to work with the developer on the architecture on that portion of the building. It is in staff's opinion that the developer has attempted to comply with the spirit and intent of the design guidelines. They have done a good job at creating a clear main entrance, breaking up with facade of the building with projections, and including corner design elements. Staff recommends the following revisions to the building elevations to further comply with the design guidelines: 1. Add cast stone to the north side of the building to match the rest of the building. 2. The internal air conditioning unit vents shown on the plans shall match the color of the adjacent siding, shakes, or stone. 3. The developer shall provide details on the locations and colors of the gutters and down spouts. 4. Where window headers are shown on the 1St floor, they should be shown on the 2"d and Yd floor. 5. The peaked roof sections should be elevated on whether they could be widened to create a more balanced design. 6. Cast stone shall be added to the pillars. 7. Staff will continue to work with the developer on the building material colors. The final design shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the issuance of the building permit. Apartment Management and Amenities In addition to underground parking, on site amenities would include: secure access, in unit laundry, on site management including a manager's office, a lounge area, a community room, a fitness center, and an outdoor children's play area. Rosemary Apartments Site Plan and CUP Page 8 Signage Monument signs are permitted for residential subdivisions and multi -family developments of nine or more units. Monument signs shall be a maximum of 32 square feet per face. The sign shall be a maximum of six feet in height, measured from the grade of the ground, and shall be setback at least ten feet from all property lines and five feet from the right-of-way. The sign shall be designed to be architecturally compatible with the project, and shall be located within a landscaped area extending at least three feet around the base of the sign. The developer is proposing a freestanding sign at the entrance of the property. The developer has not provided any details on the design of the sign. The developer has not proposed any wall signs. Prior to the installation of any sign a sign permit shall be approved by the City. Drainage/Grading The site plan shows the building located within upland area surrounded by wetlands. The existing drainage flows to the north, east and west from the high point in the center of the site. The proposed development will be matching the existing drainage area and will be directing the north and east drainage to filtration areas prior to discharging into the wetland. Proposed drainage to the west will consist of entirely pervious surface. The site meets the City's requirements for volume control, water quality, and rate control. Because the existing site is already an upland area higher than the wetland elevations, flow within the wetlands for proposed conditions will be unaffected. Staff is currently working with the developer to finalize the technical design of the stormwater management facilities, and will issue a permit for stormwater once the remaining items are resolved. The developer will be responsible for maintaining stormwater facilities and vegetation proposed as a part of the project. A maintenance agreement between the City and the applicant shall be reviewed and approved by the City then recorded against the property prior to the start of grading activities on the site. Water reuse is not being utilized on this project. The stormwater management facilities for this project are filtration basins and do not have enough stormwater to irrigate the site. The fire department recommended that the grading around the building be leveled out to provide easier access for fire protection and rescue. Utilities City water and sewer utilities are available within Rosemary Way. The utilities are sufficient to serve the development. Rosemary Apartments Site Plan and CUP Page 9 The developer will be responsible for the City's water and sewer trunk fees, as well as the water (WAC) and sewer (SAC) connection fees to be paid at the time of the building permit. The developer will also be responsible for the Met Council sewer connection fee. The Fire Department is requiring that another hydrant be installed on the west side of the parking lot. City staff will coordinate with the developer to finalize a location. Wetlands Wetlands that are present on the site have been delineated by the developer and the delineation has been approved by the City. The site plan includes some wetland filling, which will require a wetland replacement plan. The developer submitted a complete application related to their wetland replacement plan, and it is under review by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP). The replacement plan proposes using credits from the Rosemary mitigation site. A no -loss application will be approved for impacts to incidental wetlands along the northern boundary of their proposed grading since these are incidental wetlands resulting from the mitigation area increasing site hydrology. It is anticipated that the application approval will be on the April 15, 2019, City Council agenda for consideration. The developer shall dedicate a drainage and utility easement to the City over the wetland. Park Dedication The developer is proposing to install a private small park play area for its residents on the property, southwest of the building. This does not satisfy the park dedication requirement. The City Code requires either park dedication of 17 percent of the buildable land area or cash -in - lieu of land (currently $2,400 per unit). Cash -in -lieu of land would be $108,000 at the current rates ($2400 x 45 units). The Parks Commission considered accepting cash -in -lieu of land at its March 20, 2019, meeting and recommended approval to the City Council. 5. CONCLUSION: The developer has done a good job with the overall site plan and the general design of the building. Staff will continue to work with the developer on the required revisions to the plans and architecture. Staff finds that the proposal meets all the requirements necessary for the City to approve a site plan and conditional use permit as outlined in the City Code, if the conditions are met in the attached resolution. 6. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the site plan and conditional use permit application subject to the conditions listed in the attached resolution. Rosemary Apartments Site Plan and CUP Page 10 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Resolution 3. Conditional Use Permit 4. Engineers Memo dated March 22, 2019 5. Developer Narrative 6. Site Plan Submittal Package 7. Colored Rendering of Building MIR. ' � a 7'�- �7 JL RESOLUTION 2019 - APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR MWF PROPERTIES FOR AN APARTMENT BUILDING ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF ROSEMARY WAY AND WEST OF EVERTON AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, MWF Properties, has requested approval of a site plan and conditional use permit for an apartment building on the property legally described as; Outlot B, Frenchman Place WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said site plan and conditional use permit at a duly called a public hearing on March 28, 2019, and recommends approval subject to the conditions listed in this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the site plan and conditional use permit for MWF Properties for an apartment building with the following findings: Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the Final Plat for Frenchman Place Yd Addition. 2. All items on the Engineer's memo and "red -line" detailed engineering comments that have been sent directly to the developer's engineer dated March 22, 2019, shall be met. 3. The development shall be consistent with the plans submitted on February 15, 2019, and as amended by this resolution. 4. Prior to the installation of any signs, the developer shall obtain a sign permit. 5. Any areas of the street and sidewalk along Rosemary Way that are disturbed from the construction access into the site shall be restored to the City's satisfaction. Prior to the issuance of a building permit: 6. The Final Plat for Frenchman Place Yd Addition shall be recorded. 7. The landscape plan shall be revised based on staffs comments. The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff. 8. The developer shall submit final design cut sheets for the pole and wall mounted light fixtures to be reviewed and approved by staff. 9. The developer shall revise the grading plan to remove steep slopes and level the grade around the building. Resolution 2019 - Page 2 10. The developer shall provide plans showing the height of the building to 35 feet or apply for approval of a variance. 11. The developer shall provide cut -sheets pole and wall mounted fixtures will need to be reviewed and approved by staff. Shields shall be added to the lights to reduce glare. 12. The developer shall revise the plans to include two fire hydrant locations. Staff will continue to work with the application on the final location. Landscaping 13. Landscaping shall be added to the north side of the building to screen the proposed condensers. 14. The developer shall provide staff with planting details for landscaping proposed on the slopes of the property. 15. The developer shall revise the landscape plan to be reviewed and approved by staff. Architecture 16. The developer shall provide details on the locations and colors of the gutters and down spouts. The gutter and downspout system shall be integrated into the building design, including color, and shall be reviewed and approved by staff. 17. Add cast stone to the north side of the building to match the rest of the building. 18. The internal air conditioning unit vents shown on the plans shall match the color of the adjacent siding, shakes, or stone. 19. Where window headers are shown on the 1St floor, they should be shown on the 2nd and Yd floor. 20. The peaked roof sections should be elevated on whether they could be widened to create a more balanced design. 21. Cast stone shall be added to the pillars. 22. The developer shall continue to work with staff on the building material colors. 23. The developer shall revise the architecture plans to be reviewed and approved by staff. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: Resolution 2019 - Page 3 24. The developer will be responsible for maintaining stormwater facilities and vegetation proposed as a part of the project. A maintenance agreement between the City and the developer shall be reviewed and approved by the City then recorded against the property prior to the start of grading activities on the site. 25. All roof top and ground mechanical equipment must be screened from view of adjacent properties. Staff shall review and approve the locations. All ground -level mechanical units shall be low profile and located to the side or rear of the building and shall be screened from view of adjacent properties. Staff shall perform an inspection when equipment is installed to ensure compliance with City code. 26. All required landscaping shall be fully installed. 27. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated to the City over the stormwater management facilities and wetlands ADOPTED by the City Council this 15th day of April, 2019 Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Cleric CITY OF HUGO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DATE OF APPROVAL: OWNER: MWF Properties 7645 Lyndale Avenue South Minneapolis, MN 55423 ADDRESS FOR WHICH CUP IS GRANTED: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Outlot B, Frenchman Place ZONING DISTRICT: Medium Density Multiple Family Residential (R-5) THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWS FOR THE FOLLOWING: Apartment THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: 1. The building and all site improvement shall be constructed as shown on the Site plan attached as Exhibit A. 2. All conditions listed in Resolution 2019- , shall be met, as attached as Exhibit B. 3. The apartment shall have on-site management. Tom Weidt, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this day of , 2019, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared TOM WEIDT, Mayor of the City of Hugo, a Minnesota municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Hugo by the authority of the City Council of the City of Hugo, and TOM WEIDT, mayor, acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City of Hugo. Notary Public STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this day of , 2014, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared , to me known as the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, who stated that they are the owners of the property this permit applies to, and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public This document was drafted by: Hugo City Council 14669 Fitzgerald Ave N Hugo, MN 55038 7. 0 U c� Z W CO U) 0 0000 00 N ID 0 0 N W U) W W W 00 wsb March 21, 2019 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Rosemary Apartments Plan Review WSB Project No. 012467-000 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the submittal for the Rosemary Apartments located on the north side of Rosemary Way. We have reviewed the following information related to this application: Rosemary Apartments City Submittal/Construction Plans dated 2/15/19 by MWF Properties Stormwater Management Report dated 2/15/19 by CivilSite Group Design Phase Geotechnical Evaluation dated 11/19/18 by Chosen Valley Testing Based on the review of the documents, we offer the following comments related to this application: Utilities 1. The City's existing utility information identifies an 8" water service and an 8" sewer service being stubbed to or slightly past the right of way. The applicant will need to utilize the existing services rather than connecting to the main to eliminate disturbance to the roadway. 2. The Fire Department is requiring that another hydrant be installed on the west side of the parking lot. City staff will coordinate with the applicant to finalize a location. Stormwater Management 3. The site drainage is directed to filtration basins prior to discharging into adjacent wetlands. The site meets the City's requirements for volume control, water quality, and rate control. Existing flows through the wetland will not be affected. 4. A maintenance agreement/plan will be required for the stormwater management features on this site. 5. Water reuse is not being utilized on this project. The stormwater management facilities for this project are filtration basins and do not have enough stormwater to irrigate the site. Wetlands 6. The applicant has received approval for the wetland boundary and type in the fall of 2018. 7. 2,185 sq ft of wetland impacts have been identified, with the replacement plan using credits from the Rosemary mitigation site. A no -loss application will be approved for impacts to incidental wetlands along the northern boundary of their proposed grading since these are incidental wetlands resulting from the previous mitigation area increasing site hydrology. K:\012467-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-rjuba-Rosemary Apartments- 032119.docx Ms. Rachel Juba March 21, 2019 Page 2 We have provided the applicant with detailed redlined comments on their plans and will continue to work with the applicant on addressing these remaining comments prior to approving construction plans and issuance of a stormwater permit. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463. Sincerely, WSB Mark Erichson, PE City Engineer cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) Stephanie Hatten, Water Resource Engineer (email only) Chris Stokka, MWF Properties (email only) David Knaeble, Civil Site Group (email only) K:\012467-000\Admin\Docs\LTR-rjuba-Rosemary Apartments- 032119.docx Narrative Introduction This application is for a conditional use permit, final plat, and site plan approval of the property identified by PID: 1903121210013. Statement of zoning classification The site is zoned R-5 Medium Density Residential. The proposed development is consisting with the existing zoning classification. Background on site The current use of the property is raw land. The total property consists of 18.15 acres, however a majority of the site is either wetland or covered by a conservation easement that prohibits construction. This leaves the total buildable acreage of 4.787 acres acres (excluding any potential wetland credits). Proposed project MWF Properties is looking to pursue the development of a three-story multifamily housing project that would consist of 45 housing units in a three-story apartment complex with underground parking. The anticipated unit mix is 6 1 -bedroom, 18 2 -bedroom, and 213 - bedroom units. The number of units is allowable with a conditional use permit that will be submitted in the fall of this year. The project will consist of a mixture of surface and underground parking that will equate to 103 stalls, over 2 parking stalls to every residential unit. In addition to underground parking, on site amenities would include: secure access, in unit laundry, on site management including a manager's office, a community room, a fitness center, and an outdoor children's play area. The project would be rented to working class families ("workforce housing") who earn 60% of the area median income or less. This equates to $40,000 to $65,000 depending on household size. Rents will average $725 for a one bedroom, $985 for a 2 -bedroom, and $1,200 for a 3 - bedroom. ARCHITECT: MILLER HANSEN ARCHITECTS 218 WASHINGTON AVE N SUITE 230 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 612-332-5420 DEVELOPER / PROPERTY OWNER MWF PROPERTIES 7645 LYNDALE AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 612-243-4636 ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT / SURVERYOR: CIVIL SITE GROUP 4931 W 35TH STREET SUITE 200 ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 612-615-0060 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: CHOSEN VALLEY TESTING, INC. 414 37TH AVENUE N ST. CLOUD, MN 56303 320-774-3500 MASTER LEGEND: HUGO, MINNESOTA ISSUED FOR: CITY SUBMITTAL -------- 1125- m X 1137.12 EXISTING SPOT GRADE ELEVATION 3 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL r H 41.26 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE 4 - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 891.00 G � 14- 891.00 TC SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF WALL r. 891.00 BS/TS SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WALL -� DRAINAGE ARROW z � ii � � r EOF=1135.52 11-eman way 1 ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ SILT FENCE/BIOROLL- GRADING LIMIT McDonald's Q Feslnral ruod,5Q , , N INLET PROTECTION » » Kwik Trip 4454 9 K Main 5t Maan St 9 Slue Heron GrIH Laborera'Training Cenier B -1 SOIL BORING LOCATION Subway F2CSZritlf8nlS -------------------- 4'y �-r O EXISTING MANHOLE ❑ EXISTING CATCH BASIN SITE LOCATION Lions Park V EXISTING HYDRANT Unpel 141:1. . 1 N } max, 3�. 7E. Fri Aman fid ry z r r s Fr@y7{f�� �PC, ► z ; �i�� 1��hSkN � N 4 G 0�8�glei SITE LOCATION MAP N -------- 1125- EX. V CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL X 1137.12 EXISTING SPOT GRADE ELEVATION 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL H 41.26 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE 4 - UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 891.00 G SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB (GUTTER TOP) 891.00 TC SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF WALL 891.00 BS/TS SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF WALL -� DRAINAGE ARROW ii EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EOF=1135.52 I ■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ SILT FENCE/BIOROLL- GRADING LIMIT ■ ■ INLET PROTECTION » » STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE G G E E B -1 SOIL BORING LOCATION r- r - -------------------- CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) O EXISTING MANHOLE ❑ EXISTING CATCH BASIN V EXISTING HYDRANT SHEET INDEX (C070 �Hsote R GQ (ED M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 M I L L E P HANSON Cn Fm z LU 2Fm Q am a Nt M L0 O 2 U) CIf M N IZT L0 CL0 m'^ G v♦ W J H O W z 0. Z O '2^ W vJ a. LU LL Q I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE PROPOSED MANHOLE STORM C0.0 TITLE SHEET V1.0 SITE SURVEY PROPOSED CATCH BASIN OR CATCH BASIN MANHOLE STORM C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN PROPOSED GATE VALVE C2.0 SITE PLAN PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT C2.1 OVERALL SITE PLAN W/ EX. WETLAND BOUNDARIES C2.2 PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACTS PROPOSED MANHOLE SANITARY C2.3 ADJACENT PARCEL MAP PROPOSED SIGN C3.0 GRADING PLAN C4.0 UTILITY PLAN PROPOSED LIGHT C5.0 DETAILS DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER C5.1 DETAILS PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 PROPOSED STORM SEWER C5.2 DETAILS REVISION SUMMARY PROPOSED WATER MAIN C5.3 DETAILS DATE DESCRIPTION L1.0 LANDSCAPE PLAN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES & DETAILS EXISTING STORM SEWER SW1.0 SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS SW1.1 SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS EXISTING WATER MAIN 0 SW1.2 SWPPP - DETAILS EXISTING GAS MAIN 0 ® SW1.3 SWPPP - NARRATIVE TITLE SHEET EXISTING UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC SW1.4 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS � � SW1.5 SWPPP -ATTACHMENTS EXISTING UNDERGROUND CABLE v EXISTING STOPBOX EXISTING LIGHT Know what's below. " EXISTING GATE VALVE D EXISTING GAS METER Call before you dig. Como X EXISTING ELECTRIC BOX e EXISTING GAS VALVE 2/14/2019 4:58 PM Q COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. NW Corner Outlot B / /- Frenchman Place 1st Add. - - 916.0 PARCEL ID: 1 8031 21 340001 Li netype & Symbol Legend 1001.'00 _ _ ADDRESS: 15040 EVER TON AVE N I OWNER: ROSSINI STEVEN J Fo FIBER OPTIC SIGN ❑a AIR CONDITIONER \VI � WET � g g \V \V �— —� �\V N87°30'30"W 1196.83 918.7 zoae 86 Ou UTILITY MANHOLE 0241 �— 2029 915.1 20791 \V \V \V 9199 X WET 2028— wer- WET slaz �' 1G"� GAS GASMAIN 30 vs �1 i 960°03' ® BOLLARD / �ET - \, \ ,Nl SQ SANITARY MANHOLE 1 916 6 / WE 885.01. 2080 �� \ �19— �- - 915 4 —fes 7 R 0 // 917.2 X917 -g1 \ 9, , WATERMAIN ® ELECTRIC MANHOLE V \V , \1/ \V \1/ \l, \1% WET- - �\_ 8_ / / / \V S \� �L /2031 / 027 _-- / -roar �-_ / _ \9 __� _ _ 273 19 — — _ — /� > SANITARY SEWER O STORM MANHOLE xwEr '�wEr I -- 25' Rear Setback Line �\ - ----� 2087 — 917 sT \V \V \V I \V \V \Y \V \V \V \Y I \V \V \Y \V \V \V J, / `V X 15.7 �' \ X 91.7 7 14/ WET I b I / 2084 �J16 j ET r% tf��\ 4j6-/� p >> STORM SEWER ® CATCH BASIN 0- FLAG POLE IV 2 2032 �� 1\ 2oe21 �� 1 // �\ s� oHu OVERHEAD UTILITIES Q FLARED END SECTION WET I \ WE 5-� Wetland Covenant Area per Doc. / `V °I wE I \ WET 1 / �� c? Q - �___� �1.�=`v X ^ T❑ TELEPHONE BOX \V \V \V �V �V J�--- -V J/ \V �V J� �V r �V Mf `I' �s� `V r rd No. 3766372 I' �V --Z �\ °i ,),, cp TEL TELEPHONE LINE --UPLAND AREA ---2049 // s� s _/ \ 15� \ �3• y/ 1ss p� X GAS VALVE i-- x 6 \ to\ \ \ 0 Iy OT TELEPHONE MANHOLE \V \V \V I N 1V \V l¢' 'i �%, \V \V / \V \ \V \V \V \V \V \V \V \V WET \V \V / \V \V 3i`r" v V �V \ �V �V �Y �V �V \ V n� / �V . / ELE ELECTRIC LINE i ^ 1 \ I 1 "",""1 r' / \ j \ /// �'' \ \ \ ��� / HANDICAP SYMBOL I \ V cb cry CABLE LINE ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER 2021 1 \V \V \V \V 1 I � � 1 /� I \V 1 \V \V \V � \V \V �. \/ �I, \/ \I� \V \ \V ":' '_,'-' lY:1 \V \V p \V �_ / \ xWET x2033 / -I I 1 / \ �9 'S, \�S \1 bb- / h ` HYDRANT \ T 1 r IS > / yb` x CHAINLINK FENCELINE ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL \VI \V \V % \V \l,r ►` 1 1\V I 1 \V y \V \ \V y \V \V \V y \V \V \V y y \V \V y \V �� y \V y `V �j \V �\V 3o \ O \V 1 \V \V \V °3 � \V \V \ I / O I N6 / 916.2 X ° WATER MANHOLE \V \V \V� 1 �W 0 \l, r �\V1- < r yr 1 V \V \Y \V \Y \\V \V \V \V I N, X 91\91/7 N, X 91544, \V \V \V \V \V J'___�'��// \V \/ \Y \V \b \ \V \L S�9 .\ I 58.71 \V i �J/ /\V \Y �� © CABLE TV BOX \ 2034 r ' 1 L `\ ------ --- �. I� 2019 91 _ - ) 8 4"E\ - - -_ - �� ( ° a CONCRETE SURFACE ELECTRICAL METER g WATER VALVE \ WET X 916.3 \1, \V \V \V \V �- \V \V \V \V \V \V .�, .�, ` J� N87°.52'10�E \1J. a WET \ �� 76\ S 7 �O - PAVER SURFACE POWER POLE I \V \V � I \V \V \V \V \V \V \Y \Y \L • \V \V \V \V \V. �' � \V \Y \V \V \V �\V 6,�V \ I �- © GAS METE R u1 1 2 5 �� Wetland Covenant Area ��' S �� N89 58 54 W 251.28 to �' \\ P \i °035 ° , 11 W W • FOUND IRON MONUMENT \V \V \V M i y xw"\ \V \V \V \V .V .V _ \V �_--�%> er D;oc. No. 4057619 & 4057fa20 ,`�---y. \V 41 \1, \I; \V / \I S ,�\ A 3„ GUY WIRE o _ i \ 1 N71 W W WETLAND AREA CONIFEROUS TREE \V \V \� I I I�1-%� � \V ,; \V \V �, \V I \V \V \V \v ,\ � O SET IRON MONUMENT In W2036 ____--___ / \ 0 y "INCIDENTAL' \VI \Y \1/ \VT `I' ``I' `V `V `V `I' `V / I `I' `V\ `1' Al `I' \\ II `1' `1' `V `V ��' I v WETLAND AREA CAST IRON MONUMENT DECIDUOUS TREE 2018 / I / `\ \V \V \Vi WET \y \V \V \V \V \V \V \�, \V \V \rV \V \V \V \V` \V� \V \V \V \V \l� / 11 v GRAVEL SURFACE \ / 20 N DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED \V \V 1 �7 \V \V \V \V \V \V \V \V \VX 916.7 \V \V \V \V \V W \V\ \V \V JA i" ��O �' \V J, \V1 �T \V \V \V \V \1/ \V \V \V \V \V \V \I, \V \V \V \ \l, j \l� \V \V \V /I e \V \V The land referred is situated in the City of Hugo, County of Washington, State of Minnesota, and is described as follows: 2 I 2038 \V y \V \V \V \V \1, �l \V y \V \V \L \V \L / y \ \V �'\L y J, / \V y \V \V \\ 3 Outlot B, FRENCHMAN PLACE 1ST ADDITION. WET J, �, \V 1 PLARCEL ` 0: 1905121210*13 `1' \i/ �' /\4, \1�1 `1' I `1' WET ET J\4, \1, 201 s \1, \4, �, �, �, \1, �, X s1 �.s \4, r �, �, �, N, I i U P/L�t,[v'D . 2E\V � � 1 v (Abstract property) M a I WET 2039 1 / N - / I WE / 1 _z� 2097 Ld o6 -0 \L \1/ I\ WET \V \V \V \V \V \V \V 1 \V j \V•` 1 \V^\ I �V I, \V \V /V \V 1k ` % \y WE* 1 209WE 2133 , 8T I \4/ \V \V \Y \1/ N � � - N I 1 1 r /� ( I wE WET 2100 c� Z ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Notes \ \V 2041 \V \V 3 \V \V 1 \V \L7 r / Ill I \V \V \V \V \ y \V 1 \I/ \V \V \ T\V \V \V ?V \VL M N > ( P ) - 046 I r 1 I I " > = numbered per Table A a_ T04�I�VE%20 4 1 M W U WET WET �- ET / �\ r' G�15.5 \V v \V \V \V \V \V - \l) - \V \V \V LU 0 -7L o .�/ 2 W r / 1 0 1. Bearings are based on the Washington County Coordinate System (NAD83(1986 Adjustment)). \v \v \V \ S89 59 50 11 233.�'0� \V \V \V \V \v \V \VI \V \V v, v, \v \i, \V \V \t/ I o (`1 I \ / _ _ - WET / / 916.8 1 2099 \ I o o � Q r o 0 2. Site Address: Unassigned. o 1 `V \\ ^ \\\ 1 E I \V� \ \V \V \V \Vir i \V \V \ \V \V \V \V \V \V WE \V ` \V \V \V \V j V 11 \V \V \L 20 T/ \ / �!/ / \�j „ i ,"" O U W = 9 �CC p /\I' / \V \ \V \1 r' i \V,'. \V \V \V\ \11 \V \V \V \V \V Y \V \V \V V CD Z c < o J 3. This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27163C0117E, g�� 9156 \v \V \, \I' \' �(Z �' \V \V \W I effective date of February 3rd, 2010. 2011 \ I / O Fj 1! \V X \Y6.4 \V \V \V \V \V y/ 1 I \V \V \V \V \V N \V \V \V " \V r %�wEfi \ / C �9 I s\�O I; z I 1 A- 4. The Gross land area is 790,532 +/- sq. ft. or 18.148 +/- acres. �g _ ��/ \�� /�?O 2 490\OF`� r-� �� \' o til I \� Approximate upland area outside of wetlands = 192,194 +/- sq. ft. or 4.411 +/- acres. r- 1\V�- �V J \Vr 2012 11 �\\ \\ T \V om, \��� 9161% \V ,\V-� \l,�i \V \\ \V -�\V /\V \V \V \ 'mow \V \V \►, `I, "Incidental Wetland Area" per difference in previous and current wetland delineations provided by client = 16,368 +/- sq. ft. or 0.376 +/- acres WET 1 I \\ '\� I 1� \\ \11I / \V L Q � I I 1 i \l/' \V \V \V 1 14/\ \V \V \V \V \L \V \V \V \V INV \IQ i �,�� .� I\, \� It 1 1 In 6. We have not received an official zoning report/letter at the time of this survey. The current Zoning for the subject property is R-5 (Medium Density Multiple Family Residential) per �, \• z �,lIzo1h cb I to L _ OF 5 �, ri r��, i,L �1, �/ �, �, I �, N, �, \V \V \1. / N\Ih\ I \�, �1. \1, �. I the City of Hugo's zoning map dated May, 2017. Setbacks per the City of Hugo online zoning code are as follows: wE ti� E r 20 z\ F\ / \ \\ ,I' I I I I i Front - 25 feet Ito I 9� GeV \ .V \V .v ' \v \v \v vk \ �� \/ \ 1 \\ r � I I I I I i Side - 15 feet \V \t/ \V \V 0 \V 201 I L - �\ � �'�t\ � � w \V \V \V ; \V \V \ `,/ ^\� I I \V � I \1/ v , \V \V \t/ / �l/ Z WEl I _ �� / 54 \ 1 ` � Rear - 25 feet 051 i' \V \l, \V j \V \V \V rJ \V 1 V V V \ \V \V \V \V O r / \ / Please note that the general restrictions for the subject property may have been amended through a city process. We could be unaware of such amendments if they are not in a UJ I I / WET 1\ r X 916.4 \ \ S \V \V \V \V \V i rg2 \ 9p �jt• 1 \V \1/ \I, _ _\1,- - � \ 11• .I/ .I/ \V \V .I S recorded document provided to us. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. / F X 917.7 1 \ _ \ \\ /1 1?0 1 9 \ - N83° 3'13"E 119.39 6 Av I 1 '� \ S - �. _ \V \V \V P\\1, %4/\\\V \V i \ o �r2oo \ 1 I '- 2 3 JIB e zo 4 a� \ / `'�S. 9. There were no discernable parking stripes observed during the course of this survey. > WE __---UPLA D AREA w ° F \V \V \V Ij 1 I = - - _ _, _ _ I � T \V \� \V \V �^ —W \L \V 1 •p I 1,� , I2 55 \ \l, \\�, \1, \% �(0 \1, \►, \1, .61 11. We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from the following sources: plans obtained from utility x2 s3 \ �,4, / companies, plans provided by client, markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources. We have used this information to develop a view of the underground utilities .� I I / // �\ 65 �' N, 0 1 �, �1 N, �, .5 �, �, �, for this site. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurate) completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed Drainage &Utility Easement r \\ \� WET \% \ O g g y p y y p per Doc. No. X519170 20 s 1\ \ jj/�� \� �� \`� \�`� �'� ET Q 1 I o \ information is required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities \�/ \V W T / x S7 V \V \V \V \V y w ET \ \ located on the subject property. _ \ / p J P P Y• \� �/— \• \ _ \ X 916.9 ' - /b7ii� \V \V \v \V I I\ \\ )( 8198 A 1/� 917.6 )CT ww p5 13. The names of the adjoining owners of the platted lands, as shown hereon, are based on information obtained from Washington County online property map. w�` \V \l, \l \V \l o�� 16. I am not aware of any recent observable evidence of earth moving work. 2134 2009 \ II llI I C\\\\\�1 o ^C� ET WET\V \V \V \V \V \V Ir 1 SMH \ \ \� I / o;s- C / 17. I am not aware of any proposed right-of-way changes or recent street or sidewalk construction. Rim -921.8 WET \ I \ \ III III / \\ �\�� \\� \ X 9173 / wE- \L \L \L \1, \4, �l/ - ` / Inv -904.43 SE \ �, \ / 921.5 �, �, I Inv -904.23 NW 1/ 19. We have shown the location of the wetlands hereon per a latitude and longitude point file provided by Ken at Earth Science Associates via an email dated 8-24-18. I TC -921 .1 \ \ X 920.3�/ / // /� 1 / " ; \ v 1� I • r v / / O \\ 2005 I \ \ \ \ ✓ �CQ GUJ=920.6 WET 1 IIJ I \ \ �// /// 075 TC, < - \ I 1 I \ \�\ //�/// I '\>3 '\'� / WET \V \V \V `I ' ` ;V \V \V \V Y t / / / / 9276 \ y\ CBR I \ I I l \ .v3 \ \\ \ \// �j/ 9 r 1 / SURVEY REPORT ! 27 Inv -9121.5 2004%, /' p,� ^�/ v, .V \V �V` - ' \V \V .V \V •V \V / / / i / �6 Inv -918.29 I v- WET \�, �, \ \�/�/ / / I / / �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, / 1. This map and report was prepared with the benefit of a Commitment for Title Insurance issued by First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services, File No. SOS \ \\\ l! 914.8 y �V I \ \ \ // /� I / NCS-889134-MPLS, dated March 20th, 2018. We note the following with regards to Schedule B of the herein referenced Title Commitment: TC=920.9 'o 9 x\ \V \V 1 \\ \ 2 \ \ \ ✓ 74.1, \V \V \I/ \V O \3 a2 \ 2003 I Q / / / xT a. Item no.'s 1-9, 14, 16, and 18 are not survey related. O S s2 ,9 \ \ -wET I \ \ / / INV / TC=921.6 F( 2 p y 222 \V \V c \ I ���// / 15�071 2072 // \V \V \l, \V \V V, \V 1, \V \913.8 cu=921.2 F G =9215 `Fac 2111 / / / b. The following are numbered per the referenced title Commitment: Tc=921.6 Y • 922_.... `\ \ \ %�� zoo �I -Q\ \� ✓ /T \V \V \V W\ \V .V \V 2113 .V \V I .V 1 \ \\ / ocs ET INV= \ 1 / �/ ET \ / \V \V \V \V \V 2109 \V `V R1,917.4. � `1/ rn / / 10. Terms and conditions including easements for ower line and natural as pipe line purposes in favor of Northern States Power Company,as reserved or contained in a 2 \ \ ` 79� i \ /\^/ 9157 WET _ UPLAtJD AREA 914.1 / / / �/ O 9 P 9 P P P P CBR 922.5 C \ /-----,--2112 / g : 2 c u T /'` / the followin Inv -918• \I\� °� 9226. 92\\�/ 1\ \ \t 25 Font Setb I917z s \V \V \V 211 ,7 ,/ "= — — _ WETS / ��. M / �" ¢ ERM _ WET 2114 / / \\ ~ 1 ' T,2 \ N, TI 2 --\ ock dine I I� `►' \V `►' \V/x /,,,�'� �`�Eo NSPVTransmigsion I_I�ne� ET `\ �- `V / / M/ / ,` -i a Quitclaim Deed dated March 1 2004 recorded September 6 2005 as Doc. No. 3537561• Q 9222y //)K 4h� .� \.. I Easement ^T�9\s2,2 9 ST 2941..,9 ! I \lo \V wEr�/ ,'�//21osN' `�ierpoc'No.3537561r i \o`'/ .1 /// �- and 2ce�\ 6 ,' / ET - \� 2118 / WE yz f\I / b) Easement, dated May 20, 2004, recorded September 6, 2006, as Doc. No. 3537562. R. . T CBR / �... ,-.,,�.. 101`V \ �T ,/ � , ,-I 2 �, 91as / "'- ' ' "" x Fy / o p As shown hereon near the southeast corner of subjectproperty. 2y 92j417X20, \ • 0.2 I Rim 919.0 / x / \ W / s 91e WET \V \V \Y \V NSP Transmission Line\ \, 1 9s \ \ Inv=915.28 W / g z1 a Inv= 914.28 S // w Easement o�j tJs ® �� \V Inv --913.98 NE / m \V \V \V `- el Doc. No. 3537562 �r � %y' `I' / � 11. Terms and conditions, including a temporary easement for construction, roadway, drainage and utility purposes, as contained in the Construction, Drainage, Roadway, INV=1 \ T ` S>bIN 141 P 11 / 'h \\l / WE \ and Utility Easement Agreement, dated June 14, 2005, recorded June 15, 2015, as Doc. No. 3519170. 915.1 SMH g C a cs Rlm, WET y,�j PARCEL ID: 1 9031 21 21 001 4 Rim -921.9 rC,s2j 7g a .3 )) lnv-,g .6 ET`V 2102 x2103 �/ GP 2122 \V \V \V V t \V \� T. / / \ / P 9 \ NOTE: This instrument states that this Easement shall terminate "upon the Easement Area being dedicated to the public." Inv=905.99 SE 9 42131 08 x2-066 WET WET / $ a _ T / r' / / Address: 4790 ROSEMARY WAY NORTH Inv=905.94 SW 2 `� �S TC= WET ; - 1 =V S \ �/ `I' OWNER: CHRIST EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH As shown hereon near the southwest corner of subject property. 420 ST •920 6 . Inv=905.44 NES g2p.S Inv=905.40 NW r _ \ \0. O 2Q 9 CBR O922p Rim=920.8 0�5910- In \ r \ 4. �/I// \ / SMH v 4 Rim=920.1 Inv=906.75 SE Inv=906.40 NW PARCEL I D:1 9031 21 21 001 6 Owner: LAKE AREA BANK ` \ 60 30 0 30 60 120 SCALE IN FEET TC>g204 92 n 77 WET 1 \ \ �=919.9 9201 --7,_o- �ET �\9 1 TC=919.7 15" = 1 T - a "� / p ?L 2a � Gu=919.2 Rca 6 - 9. s2o �. INV= \q1 a GU=919.3 T= 03 20 �l INV= e v 11 cu= 1 rc= zo a ' ' \ 911.7 X �)k Rp EMARY, =9,99 E R�BR 911.8 TC_g904 199 I GU=91 g_4 i'" ' 9799 I s2pa 2o- X92 1` / / cU=sis 0 r 91g8 9J9 \ 9,5 s 9 TC=919.8 C=919.6 -91 I GU= 1 . j GU -g / glgg% // %'g7g�\��^1 r TC=919.8 TC=920.2 GO'=919.6 / lo—g19,4 V ,[ 9 `j 8 TC O.a— 2 \\ Inv--914.64J'SO.O Sin CBR O � e /A �Iv=915.08 IS RCP jG'979 j 1 / 9 ' V / 4 / / / / CBR Rim -918.8 IS Inv=914.86 4. 919 7 ° 91 . ry 919.2 979 ¢ INV= ti 911.6 INV= 911.5 12. Terms and conditions, Including easements for driveways, curbs, sidewalks, and walkways, contained in the Cross Access Easement Agreement, dated March 8, 2006, recorded May 9, 2006, as Doc. No. 3583174. Does not appear to affect subject property. 13. Terms and conditions, including easements for driveways, curbs, sidewalks, walkways, and guard rails, as contained in the Agreement Regarding Cross Easements, dated March 15, 2006, recorded Augut 3, 2006, as Doc. No. 3599210. Does not appear to affect subject property. 15. Terms and conditions, Including easements, as contained in the Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Site Specific Wetland Replacement, dated January 8, 2009, recorded November 9, 2009, as Doc. No. 3766372, As shown hereon in central portion of subject property. 17. Terms and conditions, including easements, as contained in the Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Project -Specific Wetland Replacement, dated February 16, 2016, recorded February 17, 2016, as Doc. No. 4057619, and the Consent by Lake Area Bank, dated February 16, 2016, recorded February 17, 2016, as Doc. No. 4057620. As shown hereon near northeast corner of subject property. H U w O IY CL W ALTA CERTIFICATION To: MWF Properties LLC; Lake Area Bank, a Minnesota banking corporation; and First American Title Insurance Company National Commercial Services: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, 13, 16, and 17 of Table A thereof. The field work was completed on 6/22/2018. P Dated this 21st dg*af�_gust, 2018. Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565 rory@civilsitegroup.com /. a�r w V A L" G R 4 V P 4931 W. 35TH ST. SUITE 200 ST. LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CivilSiteGroup.com �0� F_ 0 Q F_ 0) r Z Q V Z W W LL 1 0 J F_ 0 H U) W Z I- D 0 Z 0 Z N 2 Q G W U) 0� ii J O U) < Lu W � z W I j /0�/ 0 LL W li LL Q W C J G � J L0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE AIINNESOTA. RORY L. SYNSTELIEN DATE 8/21/2018 LICENSE NO. 44565 'NV w z 1. FANNII VICINITY MAP w a SITE FI Z 0 ~ //9 149th ROS,- w C F NO.: 18125 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY V1 0 ■ COPYRIGHT 2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 8-28-18 Updated Weland Lines 9-07-18 Update Areas and Zoning 11-6-18 Uodate Uoland/Wetland Are F NO.: 18125 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY V1 0 ■ COPYRIGHT 2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. NW Corner Outlot B -- Frenchman Place 1st Add. 916.0 Lo IT7 \1/ wET4 N8-7° PARCEL ID: 1 8031 21 340001 ADDRESS: 15040 EVERTON AVE N OWNER: ROSSINI STEVEN J CITY OF HUGO REMOVAL NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES. ----- I \ 8 -------------- -- ---707.- - 9, sr- - _ - 30 30 W 1196.83 9187 2088 086 . - .. 23./- .. - \ -X2029 - 2026 --------- 2079 0 3' \� \� \1/ 916.6 I X �L .. \1/ \1/ \1/ _ \ _ _ WET 914.2 I / WET / 2_C30X l 2028 / INE -t- - - - .. - ;. - _ _ _ _ _ 20,3 ✓ 978.0 I I 9,6.6 / / /WET,/ r /02 --.._.._.._2NE080" -�_\EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 0317 \1/ \1/ \1/ \ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ �\ / .. _ 8- _ \1/ \1/ s/S\p - - _ _ `L 279." ✓ 2'081- , - .. _ _ -a��- ✓ / i / \ - ------ ---- 0.0w X ✓ z1087 \ _ ------ 5 Rear Setback Line / '!_� __ _ . T , _; _ _ --917-, --� /�--- I I _-___----____�7;7✓ -- z ��\-.\l,-..��-.. �.-.. `1'.._..�' �_-_�_ - ---\ �' �°�i� lot Cor SEE SWPPP ON SHEETSSW1.0-SW1.5 I / WET / WET i \ \1/ / // /\1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ I \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ I/ \1/ X 915.7 `L `lye �\ _ Pi - - d---__ 2084 _�� 4GET �\ \ - --91fY�ai' /O 1 2022 / \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ W \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ NV \l t \1/ / \1/ \1/ \ice - nx \1/7 `cj/ WE`\\`\�C�\1/ Vd�T WET I � 2082 WET X915-'� �' \ �`�\� Q _ Wetland Covenant Area per Doc. - zo �1/ \1/ \1/ I \li \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ I\1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ NV \1/ \1 i \1/ \1/ \l/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \L,io\r-`;(No. 66372 l 15 I j ---- y --�j'��� �\ -------------------------- --- UPLAN AREA 2089 S \ R` \ tK �• \4, 4- � � � � � �, �, A D � � , , - �,� , \1, I ,\4, `� \1/ \1/ \LX WET \1/ \1/ : \4/ \4/ 6 �\ \L \L\ `- " \1/ \1/ \L �/ \1/ \L \` \L �nj3 / \1/, I II , 2021��1J 11/ \1/ \1/ \1/ r4' 11/ \1/ i/ \1/ \ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ t,\�l/ \1/ \b\ \1/ \1/ WETV ND \1/ \l. \1/ / �'- (/ h I \ WET 2033 IA`I \ \ -- j \\ S`S�\ ! WET \ $p °� 3� \L �/ aO 1% \L \1/ \LL \L \L \:` 1/ \1/ \L \L \L \L \L \1/ \1/ \L \L \1/ \L \L \L \1/ \L \L \1/ S\ �`1 / 916L/.2 ?\:202 X 91s.7 / \L coWET4/ X 915.41 \1/ 58`1 \1/ A\/ I ``\ \/\ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ ` O ` I I I 1 \ X 2034 WET ------ r� \ °52T10" 1! X 91 .3 14/11,\!�� •V � _____---�----- .1/ \1/ \l/ .1/ \1/ , �\1/ .1/ .1/ II 2019 �7'„ _- 1 / \ �..-..' w0T \ 6, - I ss �\�O S89° 54"E `� \ `---�'"\1/ \1/ 4, , \1/ 63J,, Z \1/ \1/ \1/ ` \l. \1/ \1/ � \li \li \ `1' 10/1200 Ln I zo Wetland Covenant Area - i O)0o• WET --' " SS„ 44.2 Lot Car N89058'54"W 251.28 Lot Cor M I per D No. 40 7619 & 7620 F E \i% \t/ =- ---- ---------- \ \V \ / \1/ .1/ \V �, \l� \1/ .1/ .1/ I I * \V `'`., \1/ NV \V \I/ ---------- --'\. .1/ \� \P, / \I/ .1/ \ / \1/�I .1/ \t/ \4 \/ \l/ .1/----------------------------------------- 2036 ------ ------2036 \1/. \!r \1/ \i. 1 W\EL \i. \4/ \i. \i/ \i/ \i/ \ 11/ \1/ I X2018 b /WET \1/ I \L \1/ \1/ \� \� <C/ .l, 2W \l. \l. \� \� \V \I/ \/ ;' .� \l x 916.7 ./ \1/ \l. \/ \� \I �/ \l. �\ \� \� \l. \1, � 4 20 4, o" \l. \l. .� \� �. REMOVAL NOTES -2092111 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ (' \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ / \\ \1/ 1 \l.\ I \1/ \j/ WET =rye \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ I `b I 246 I`1/ 1 1. SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. wETB 2. REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 41 F"IK R C E L IDI/ 19 0 3121210013 `1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ / \!/ \l `{ \1/ 1\1! 'WET UPL/j,P�D A& A 3. REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. vL vL I �2111 vjr 171/ 171/ vL vL vL \\ v1) vY 171/ X Sir-✓ vL vL 171/ vL / vL 171/ 1 \ v!r b o I I WET 12039 \ - % ; / % { X WET ,� X2097 /7 w 4. EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED M U nWET i WET 2133 WET I 1 \ \1/ \1/ \1/ •1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ •1/ I \1/ •1/ •1/ \1/ /� •1• •�(/ \ •1/ �/- WET \1/` 2098 (% \1/ \i/ \1/ \1/ \1/ j PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS. oo I I % \ \ I WET WET 2100 I } N O J \U \/ \1/ 12 •1/ 2oa1 \1/ `1'� rL \1/ \L \l0% \1/ •1/ •1/ \1/ •1/ \ •1/ \1/ \\j� \l/ •1• \1/ Er •1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ •1• :1/ I� CD 5. REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL ,. _ -/ 046 - , P i y"1 M N Z 2-0 r:WE94�- / WE - zEr % I 1 /6. I / 1 �I I r� a REGULATIONS. ko \\ / / / / E - - _ _ % \'' \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ { \1/\ai s.s \1/\ \ I \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 11 \1/ �\l� A 1 ° D\1/ \1/ \1/ w N w U L ________ ____1_____ \ _ -� { % W� I = o 6. ABANDON, REMOVAL CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH 9' _ �c `� `L `L `L 1 `L `L `� `L `L Q �2 ~ = PROPOSED PLANS. \1 I \1/ \1/ \1/ \ // --_-- D W `\� \x \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 1 \1/ \1/ f 1 py N S89°'S9'S0"E 233. `_ WET \ 916.a 1 1 � v O / / ��- �, 2099 1 Q _ \ �----- ./1 1 WET o I 1.1/ \1/ \1/ \L / // /' �� 1 1 y 4 / { \1/ i \ \1/ \1/ \1/ 11/ \1/ \1/ \L \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ �� \L \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 0 " Q 7. EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. ET { A \ A Q W EXISTING WETLAND I `\o �,�I D \ f I v� w z 8. PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK \t/ � \1/ \t/ /�'� v .1/ \t/ \t/ \ \lr .1/ \t/ \V \1/ \V \l1 Z \1/ \1/ \t/ \V .V BOUNDARY I {' `�\ IL TL \ 11 o i # o J WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS {\ 9 VV \l/ \1/ \1/ \l/ \1 \ 915.6 ; CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. Ole01 ; \� \. \ X 91x.4\\ �O I 1 `�'' J 9. MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITY vLt vL 171/ 171/ `1i wET / l� 9 vL 171/ v 171/ 171/ vL 171/ vL vL; 171/ vL vL 171/ vL vL 1 171/ 171/ vL vL J / /------------------ \ \ l ; N REQUIREMENTS. A zo 9 � \1/ \bP,,�`o \ / 9\1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \\ \` \1/ \1/ \1/ / \1/ \1/ \1/ o \1/ \1/ \1/ � I L O I \j `I,� WT \ 0\ i 916 n ; \ 1 10. DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY I , D D D"' \ WET 1 I \4/ �GS`\ �T `�' `1/ I/) j' `!r '\,V \ \1/ \1/ �\1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ I.1/ \ 9,, \ I/ I \ THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. \1/ y I I cp \1/ t� `i�� n � % I 1 I ♦♦ • ..jt� \ KT EXISTING WETLAND %1 \ `11 I r 11. PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS \l% \1/ \V \1r z \1/ I I ' ♦ I F \l/ \)' BOUNDARY,(2012) AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. O �X2onl cit ETO 20 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS WET ♦ -\D - E / 1 12. SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER \l/ \1/ 11/ \bW \l/ it .� +'r I \ \ ' EXISTING WETLAND/ `l' \t' \tr \l/ \V \tr \l/ \l/ \l% NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH j_1-116 _(BOUNDARY (2018) vLvi. / vi. vlON \1/ \1/ \1/ o � � w r I I - - - _ \ '� � �:Y ,' � \ `�: I � \1/ \1/ \1)1 \1/ \1/ \1. :1/ THE CITY. .6 I -�; \ 09 _\ \ / \ �� �I 1114 13. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING 051 ♦ /V / �, a000 I Q I9' F9 WET \ \ X 16A t HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED s x ♦ \ `\ `1' `1' \!r__ _ `k --- �\ `1' `1' `L `1' `!r nL `lr `!r `/ \V. � ` S WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. I I 1 I \ I 917.7 \, \ ____ - 39 \ \ \ // \ S�,c 1 I 1 N83 3'13"E it v V / \ _ \l/ \.1/ \\l/ \l/ , \l� \l/ \l/ \l� \l/ \l/ \l� \lam \l/\ 6 14. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON • 20 1-\�-' 206 - - --k \ kPJ�S�i o 20 1 I UPLAND AREA I / '\,. X20 3 - - w� WE W, c'� \\ / \ �\ UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, w \l' i I I I ✓/ \\,, �. `' �,�\\`l' `� \ `l' `l' /;� `l' `l' `l' `l' `l' \ �g BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO x20 i� � /(0. \ `(9 ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 2 3 \ \ sa T \ \ / ``� 15. SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS D�'ainage &`�ltility Easement `1' 1 l / // /� �\ WET \ 06 \L �Q�9jl`L \// p3 �' I / �/ // \� ` j\�Xrw \ / o REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. per Doc. No. 3519170 \ / ri/ // ��� ��� \ t\ / \1/ p WE� I I \ / / j�/j /moi \\ �� \ \ WET 3'B. 1�0 0 `\ \1/ // ,\'\ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \L \1/ ii //� \\ \ x �/ �/ - �� �� \ \ --- \ 1 WET WET ` / �° a ow 16. STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND x e,19 I \ 'WET \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ .1/ \l/ \l, \1/ / MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. i X91 y.8X 917.9 I 1 \ �.// / 0 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 1 IV- \, _ �� \� \�\ \\ N1; \\ \ \ I y , I \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ N \1/ /-��1 ,- 2017\ WEt ADJUST EXISTINg�3 \ °p1 STOCK PILEA�/ 1 \ ��� \�\ ��Z\\���\� \\\\ \ \ I N6� I %llll 111 zoos I� I NECESSq / \ � �\\\\\\\ \\ \\ 120UwEr4\1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ atio� --- --- 8 sMH \ I I II I II x 911.3 %wE ET Lot Cor ---- ( ---------\L \1/ _1 I I I III l \ \ \ \ \ \ \\\\\ \\ ) /> / 1 i I Inv -044 \ I Inv=904.43 SE - 92i.5 D� \ I In II-��904.23 NW � \ � I III \ \ \ \ - \ ' X 920.3 \ \ \ \. // ///�// /// / / a• / TI -121.1 � � I I I I I I I I I \ \ \ \ `3S\ \ / / / °l / / i \1/ �\ I L /� 20 I I II \ \ \ \ \�,/�%///� / \ \ \ \ \ / / // // / / ♦ 0075 I �� CBR \ / WE \ \ I I I I \ \ \ \ ✓/ ♦ ,� WE Rim=921.5 / 04 \ \ I \l \ \ \ \� / /� % / ///�/ � .jib (\ D : /' , / / CU 9 2,r r \ \ t\\\\ \� \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 3��� \\ \ \ \ /% i, /i /// // /' / / ♦ y \L \L \1/ �1/ \ V \L \L \L \4/ \l/ \1/ 206 Q \ NS" � 410N LIMI'�S \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \v// /// ///�j// / ♦ T6\ INV= \ \ \ \\� \\\\ \\ �� \ / �//ilii/i / // // ♦ ,� / / / s2 �� So 1 • \\ \ 914.8 `L\ \ 1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ v�� /i i� /�/ / / ♦ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ / / // / ,' \�>s�o 9 „ a�6 4 �� 1 \1/ \1/ �\ \ tJ 1 \ \ \ 2 \ \ \ ` // / iii% / / / / ♦i / 74 \j/ 11/ y y 11/ 11/ y \L \1/ y y \1/ /' /' TC=921.6 GU=921.2 r Zea I `. 2003 \ \ \ \ \ _.// �/ /// / / / ♦ WET / / t, WET 1 \ / / / ///� / / ♦ / / I / ". ne ` $ s220 s \ ^ \ \ \ \ \_� ♦ / INV= \ �5 \ I 2 ^\ \ \1/ \1/ \ \ \ \ \ / /// / / / / ♦ 2671 2072 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ '913.8 u9�s2t6s 6Q \II \\ \ \ \ \ \ `��\/ // / / w / \ 79\ \ \ \ j / / too \1/ \Fj/ 9ti1 I I ^ \\ '< _ \� \ \ / /// / , / ♦T� ati\ c-9z1.s- tih\ t 2� 922�\\\\ \1/ / \ � NET / /•/ / •/ // 2�- - \\ \�\ j // - 0 s NET INV= 2109 \1/ \I/ \ `1/ 914.1 WET - UPLAND AREA _ ``� Rim=917.4 CBR 922. ^u 'c. '..�\\���� 1g \\ /// J/ // / 91' EXISTING WETLANDS 2112 \1/ 9� Rim=181.6 I \ c6° 92 \\ \ �! - 25' grant 19n.z L ' 7, BERM --__- WET 2114 / // Inv 1 \\ / CO 922s `2� \ c, I Alw T BOUNDARY (2012) z1o7 _ _----------- WET \ 9 \ s = REMOVE EXISTING SIDEWALK, / o - , I I WET \\ 6 \ ✓ I \L NSP\Transmissbn Line �L a \1/ I c \' h`s? \ I Easement I / //'/ \\\�, �x ` R-�R'� y 2 COORDINATE WI SITE PLAN, TYP. I I EXISTING WETLAND ,,, j `wET WET 1 s7 l BOUNDARY 018) /� I vl/ //, D� Too\ s2 s `4 ?4�s� \ Q I I / W y /\jr \1/ \per Doc. No. 35375iU .., \1/ \1// �y, WE i'. � / x WET �-f1!5 ✓�` / N / / // _ /X \1/ET /211T 2-118'/W WET �o RR �v A� 11 914.s cBR / �10� WETLAND�POND 10 - �wE�/ /' /" 1 0 m\ 9 \ -r12 - '� Rim=919.0 }� `., \1/ 9/Q 5 \ \ 9180 i Inv=915.28 W wET `1, \1/ NSP Tralxsmissionkine \1/r \ = �I 'o / REMOVE EXISTING S ` \�? ��' ®�j / CONS RUCiv4TS //' Easement k�\��� `�j'`, /� c, : //'rsf CURB AND \ W I\!/ \1/ \1/ \1/ pe4/Doc. No.\13537562\1/ \1/ �i' \1/ / - � \lSs �\ / _ m " �// / INV. ♦ s \ WE/T wEr// / '/ / 915.1 GUTTER, TYP. cL. \ J R;m y \- zo6 wEa �„ / /' //. r sz, ♦l\mac \ lnvs16o.s/�__ N *WET `1/ Z' J. -' . _ .. _*z1zz \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ i`�`� // \1/ / may// i \1/ PARCEL ID: 1903121210014 SMH �s '4 ♦ /^ v 5 2102 2103 W ., A, , / /`. / / Rim=921.9 2ts ♦ z- X_, .� e 7 - wET -�wEr woe F _, /. \ /• // Address: 4790 ROSEMARY WAY NORTH Inr-905.99 SE n S// OWNER: CHRIST EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH Inv=905.94 SW � - - _ �i ,. _ ..� ��J� T W�E6T� � - �G _ _ - � \�r- .. _ . \1/ ' \/ \1/ \1/ `. Inv=905.44 NE Inv=905.40 NW CBR Rim=920.8- Inw917.27 I /V PAFZCI- D: 1 90.5" 21 i1 C01 6 Owrer: /SKIT AF,FA BANK G" -92p R -127,0 SMH Rim=920.1 Inv --906.75 SE Inv --906.40 NW _ p.s.a. _ U\979.9.\ ...... .�� 52 . - ET , TC -919.7 _ a O GU=979.2 5 =919.61"RCP -- 920. y1/ \1/ \t/ ' GU=919 7 TC -920.4 INV= •rya 3 . �,• / � INV= . �� \ \1/ R�BR 911.7 ' 911.8 GU=919.9 / ,GU =918.9 �f =--__ TC= i GU=919.4 920.4 1 �'� A1/ / U=919.7 ✓TC�9 '9.-�\9j$/8 I TC=9198 ~ TC -6 -919.6GUR ==911��=91� / a"/J./ 9T9. j dd /792 Qe• 1�' T iC- / 7 -919.8 TC=920.2 >/ M/ ' / i� .[ �.e•��, p CBR O Rim=918.9 / ' C Inv=914.64 / /• /� / SQ \ s7 \ swo /' /•/ / /// CBR 'Is � s\`eC�a1I �3J Rim=919.1"R - �'G' //// / / / / / //// Inv -915.08 CP� s3991s. AD CBR_ Z �� U O / ,/ / / �// Riv=99486 sRcA 0G � N /19.2 9'90 // / O REMOVALS LEGEND: -------- 1125 -------- FL//7==_j EZET= EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL REMOVAL OF PAVEMENT AND ALL BASE MATERIAL, INCLUDING BIT., CONIC., AND GRAVEL PVMTS. REMOVAL OF STRUCTURE INCLUDING ALL FOOTINGS AND FOUNDATIONS. REMOVE CURB AND GUTTER. IF IN RIGHT-OF-WAY, COORDINATE WITH LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT. TREE PROTECTION TREE REMOVAL - INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS 0 Know what's below. Call before you dig A(! N 1 " = 50'-0" 25-0" 0 50'-0" 2/14/2019 4:58 PM clovo �Hsot�� R �� CM G3 ( M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 M I L L E P HANSON Cn FM z LU Q am a M N IZT L0 L0 W J LU Wz a z 02 Wco a LU LL Q LU J 0 J L0 CO ti I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION REMOVALS PLAN C1 0 ■ COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. Ij NW Corner Outlot B Frenchman Place 1st Add. 916.0 CITY OF HUGO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES. _ _ PARCEL ID: 1803121340001 ADDRESS: 15040 EVERTON AVE N _ _ _ owNER: RosSINI STEVEN OPERATIONAL NOTES: ' 1 20�74 6\1/ wEo `L \L \1/ �' `t' 707.69151-N87°30'30"W 1196.83 s,s7 zo8e o 8 �,,, CV 2079WET/ 2028 / W ! 920.3 918.0','916.6 1 2 2029 2026 I� T WET 914.12 SNOW REMOVAL: T i I 916 6 WET 1 2080 15.4 ' \ --- 978 0 - ._ -* - ALL SNOW SHALL OCCUR XXXXX. \1/ \D \1/ \1/ \lY \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/�\ /'� . \I/ s \I/ \I/ 279 `9 -- 1 031 027 i _-_-- - - 2751-�' / \ Ss 0 -ow ------ 25 Rear Setback Line �w�Tzo87 \ I 1 WET WET 1 \ --- i /l(J 41 \lam � � \lam \1/ i < 917.7 v�L.. �_ \ % /^ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ X 9,5.7 \1/ Z COFRASH REMOVAL: 1 95 X84 es WE s�\` s - TRASH REMOVAL SHALL OCCUR:XXXXX. 14,11 `1' \L 41 /20 \I/ \I/ 1d/ \I/ \1/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \ \i�� - ��og3 �1/ \LT \1/ 6° \ \L \1/ \L \L - \L �l' /,� / I 1 WET �2032 ; \ WET WET \ r, \ Q ___ _ Wetland Covenant Area per Doc. 7=^, `� 2082 s \'u� 11/ \1/ \L 1 \L \1/ \L \L \L \1/ \1/ \1/ 1 \1/ \L \1/ \1/ \1/ \L \1/ \1/ \L \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \L ; ' \1/ 'L `\ \L \lls\ \L / ' = N o. 66372 DELIVERIES: -------------- UPLAND AREA ------- ------- ' 15 X2089 s6\ \ -- t> 03y /� / DELIVERIES SHALL OCCUR XXXXX. \L \L \L `�/ \1/ \L \L \L \L \L iL \1/ \L Q � D \1/ \I/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \I/ \I/ \1/ \V \V \1/ WET \1/ \L ; '\1/ \L Sl�\4, \L \1% \1/ \L \1/ `�1/i \1/ \L ```� \t" IR/'/ wnj // ;, L ` , \ \ \ `, I / �I D 202, \l/ \1/ \I/ V V \I/ \l/ \l/ \I/ \l/ \l/ \I/ \I/ \l/ \l/ \I/ \l/ \l/ \I/ �l/ \l/ \l/ � �`�/ \l/ 11 \I/ `\ \I/ W _ %ice ND \I/ // *WET 2033'%' \\ \\ is ,` a6 k� $ -- Q / \I WET \I/ \I/ NV \I/ NI/ NV \I/ \1/ \I/ \I/ \1/ \4/ : ; \I/ \1/ \I/ \I/ \ \I/ �/ Ss�6` �p \I/ 1 \I/ \1/ \I/ °3 I `,.' \4/ / N / SITE LAYOUT NOTES: \ 0,9"-, 6� O 202 ` x 915.7 - \ � � ob 916.2 \I/ 1 : WET \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \1/ pit \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ X 915.4 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ -_�!i' \I/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ `\ \1/ \1/ \�% \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \I/ / 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY LOCATIONS AND LAYOUT OF ALL SITE ELEMENTS PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION, d I \ �' \ F 58`1:1 I x2034 - --- INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO LOCATIONS OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES EASEMENTS I . WET -------------' - �I ,� I x 916.3 ------"---------- °52r10T- / SETBACKS UTILITIES BUILDINGS AND PAVEMENTS CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINAL LOCATIONS F ALL I d- 1 \y \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ - \1/ __-----tl/------ \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ / .\1/ \I/ \I/ \._\1!_ . \I/ � . _ . P F . _ .\� L I 0 M 2019 �` / ��\� ° \ wEr 14/ 14, �, \1/ 14, \� SSUy,�?0Z �, S89 54"E L \\ W /12 ELEMENTS FOR THE SITE. ANY REVISIONS REQUIRED AFTER COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION, DUE TO LO *20 wetland Covenant Area ; _,= ' / �>S 20 - - - ° - - 0•� LOCATIONAL ADJUSTMENTS SHALL BE CORRECTED AT NO ADDITIONAL COST TO OWNER. ADJUSTMENTS TO THE WET / s 4 ,, „� Lot Cor N89 58 54 W 251.28 Lot Cor �/ M j �/ - per Dqr. No. 40V619 & A 57620 �, ____ _______- �, �, �, �, �, �, �, �, S ,003 LAYOUT SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF MATERIALS. M I �036 _____---- ; ` N�STAKE LAYOUT FOR APPROVAL. `` ---------------------------------------`- __-_ �,''' ! `� �/ 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING A RIGHT-OF-WAY \1/ \1/ \l \L *W\ \1/ \L\L \1/ \L \L \1/ %' \1/ \L \1/ \L \L \L \1/ \1/ \L \1/ \1/ \L \L \L ^�/ \L \L \L hl/ It AND STREET OPENING PERMIT. I 1 1 2018 ; ; / e i WE \4/ \1/ \1/ \4/ \/ \ \4/ \4/ \� �/ �/ \� \� �/ �/ \� �/ �/ \t, \y% \1/ \1/ \l/ \l/ I 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY RECOMMENDATIONS NOTED IN THE GEO TECHNICAL REPORT PRIOR TO I INSTALLATION OF SITE IMPROVEMENT MATERIALS. I 1 1 % I 2095 / N �1/ \1/ x zqg \I/ \1/ \l/ \1/ \l/ \l/ \1/ \1/ \l/ \4/ \1/ \l/ \l/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ wET`L / o \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ I / IWET ; X916.7 i � � I 094 0 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY COORDINATES AND LOCATION DIMENSIONS OF THE BUILDING AND STAKE FOR \1/ \1/ `4'i WET7 I \1/ ;' \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ `I' WET 2046=`kl' `1' `1' `1' `I' REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF FOOTING MATERIALS. I � I 203a �' �' 1 %d' +I 5. LOCATIONS OF STRUCTURES, ROADWAY PAVEMENTS, CURBS AND GUTTERS, BOLLARDS, AND WALKS ARE *WET - 093 / J APPROXIMATE AND SHALL BE STAKED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE clovo �Hsote R CM G3 ( M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 M I L L E P HANSON I\1' \� \� \� \� \� \� \� jRCEL IIS 190312#210013 \1/ 11 �, xWET2aaWET ENGINEERILANDSCAPEARCHlTECT. C 1 r % 2e UPLAND AREA / J �, �, 2016 I \I/ \1/ \1/ \I/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1✓ \I/ s16�/ \I/ \I/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \I/ Xb1 / \I/ \I/ \I/ \1/ \I/ CD I U I WET 12039 % 1 % -ID WET x2097 /� I�' J 6. CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO FACE OF CURB. BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CONCRETE IWET % I WET 2133 WET ( Q FOUNDATION. LOCATION OF BUILDING IS TO BUILDING FOUNDATION AND SHALL BE AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. M �/ \I/ \4/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ 1 \I/ I \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ (/ \I/ ao90a/- \I/ WET\I/ 2098 � \I/ \I/ \I/ \i/ \1/ I ,� L C� CO I a I C 00 WET WET 2100 N O W n I 2�1 z %� �; ET � � � � � I ^ o CD 7. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT SHOP DRAWINGS OR SAMPLES AS SPECIFIED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE Z \1/ \1/ \1/ 2041 \1/ \1/� a i T 4 �T -_x 2_047 - - x4 2046_ z 4 P %!\ M Q ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO FABRICATION FOR ALL PREFABRICATED SITE IMPROVEMENT Co Wil/ \I/ I _ WET ET �/ % \I/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ r<\9i5.5 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \ \1/ �\l� n D. \1/ \1/ V w U MATERIALS SUCH AS, BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE FOLLOWING, FURNISHINGS, PAVEMENTS, WALLS, RAILINGS, Uj 1l' / X ;J�' \ E �` 15.0 _ � -------------------------- - -J % �2099 / \ W o o Ir BENCHES, FLAGPOLES, LANDING PADS FOR CURB RAMPS, AND LIGHT AND POLES. THE OWNER RESERVES THE RIGHT oss9°59'50"E 233. wEr W T\9168\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\I/ \1/ \I/ \I/ �\1/ \1/ \I/ \1/ \1/ o ° TO REJECT INSTALLED MATERIALS NOT PREVIOUSLY APPROVED. Co -- \ I I .._ N p - - - \\ Q WET \ O Z 2 Ln ET \1/ \1/ \L� ET `I'; \IZT NF `I' `1' `1' `1' `I' `1' `1' `I' `I' `I' `I' `I' `I' \ `1' `I' `I' `1' `1' i o J Q 8. PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMPS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITH TRUNCATED DOME LANDING AREAS IN ACCORDANCE EXISTING WETLAND \\� D \\ I w WITH A.D.A. REQUIREMENTS -SEE DETAIL. BOUNDARY �� 4 \\ o I I � o � 9. CROSSWALK STRIPING SHALL BE 24" WIDE WHITE PAINTED LINE, SPACED 48" ON CENTER PERPENDICULAR TO THE vL v1/ v1/ v1/ v1/ v1/ I; st5.s vL v1/ v1/ vL vL \\ vL vL v1/ vl� Lf7 (\ T \ x \ o FLOW OF TRAFFIC. WIDTH OF CROSSWALK SHALL BE 5 WIDE. ALL OTHER PAVEMENT MARKINGS SHALL BE WHITE IN V) \4/ \4/ 14/ v � C92 \ \4/ 9�4 \\ 0014, �, \4/ \4/ \4/ \4/ ;I;; 14/ �, \4/ 4/ \4/ \4/ \\ N \4/ 14/ �, COLOR UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED OR REQUIRED BY ADA OR LOCAL GOVERNING BODIES. z LO W 0 10. SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND GUTTER TYPE. TAPER BETWEEN CURB TYPES -SEE DETAIL. O W T o \ i� 9165 11 \ 11. ALL CURB RADII ARE MINIMUM T UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. am O W VV _ - W F \ <'2 I I 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL REFER TO FINAL PLAT FOR LOT BOUNDARIES, NUMBERS, AREAS AND DIMENSIONS PRIOR TO W Z �' �' w ♦ \``\� �� EXISTING WETLAND �' �' �' �' \\ �' �' I I SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 2 a 00 a o \1/ F�1 ♦ \l, \y.\ \I/ BOUNDARY (2012) \i/ �l/ \1/ \1/ \I/ \1/ \1/ \\\1/ \I/ \1/ \1/ I 13. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING SITE CONDITIONS, DIMENSIONS. O xWET' ET 20 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS \ Q �/ (/j 11/ \1/ \1/ \� \1/ h i � �' ' E �' EXISTING WETLAND J' `L `\1/ \1/ \1/ \L \1/ \\\ \L \L \1/ `i i 14. PARKING IS TO BE SET PARALLEL OR PERPENDICULAR TO EXISTING BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. > a W I - BOUNDARY (2018) I " > w `1' 2 10 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \L� \1/ \1/ \1%\ \1/ \1/ 15. ALL PARKING LOT PAINT STRIPPING TO BE WHITE 4" WIDE TYP. LL < E v '� v 1114 11/ \1/ \1/ \1/ I I" X ♦ \`I' `� `I' `I' `I' `I' `1' `I' `I' `I' `I' `I' `I' 000 16. BITUMINOUS PAVING TO BE "LIGHT DUTY" UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SEE DETAIL SHEETS FOR PAVEMENT Q111 2 w �: -i Q ` \ X 16,4 ' SECTIONS. Q w \\-' \1/ -- _ �-- ,p\ \ J W I `-- s3 3'13"E 119 , / 17. ALL TREES THAT ARE TO REMAIN ARE TO BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE WITH A CONSTRUCTION FENCE AT THE DRIP Z N 0 222.0' �� W ® E \ w w06 sr'm �/ v' `.F / LINE. SEE LANDSCAPE DOCUMENTS. J \1/ \1/ .I/ w \I/ i N \ w \ / rQ \ \I/ ;` \I/ \I/ /\1/ \I/ \1/ \I/ 1g / / ,'' ,.' ' / -- LU \ sr ,. -- � � � \ /• / SITE AREA TABLE: D`�ainage &*tility Eas*ment `� �� % y ` \ ,r t6 \ `\1/'`W_ gVfT \L \L 0� \1/ \1/ \L \I \1/ \L per Doc. No. 3519170 �/ 20C1 ® _ ET ® v . WE %1�3 120 0 x •� / off' 11 / ' ' Q� 1-- C') W �yET� �`. vL / tkti v1/ vL vL i vL vL ��� ,' ,' / / / //' ' Lot Car /' /' �, EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED CONDITION 11 '2078 // / BUILDING COVERAGE 0 SF 0.0% 20,616 SF 2.6/0 4' \4/ ; ® ® ® ® ® ; ��\\ \h � wEr �' \1/ \1/ \1/ \I/ \1/ / /\1/ 0 '� '' / /''LU ALL PAVEMENTS 0 SF 0.0% 27,200 SF 3.4% p f ALL NON -PAVEMENTS 790,532 SF 100.0% 742,716 SF 94.0/ � ------�--�•�\}/- \I/ \I/ I � � v I l �� 001 . 1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, 006 ® / n7 2' SPECIFICATION, �, �, �/ �, �, 11 ';Ab �,�' ,.�' TOTAL SITE AREA 790,532 SF 100.0% 790,532 SF 100.0% SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS 1� PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT �vET 000 / / / / / ET Lot ,, , / --- -------g ----------- SMH ® X 9n.3 ' / / / ,' SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY Q4 -/ Z I �' Rim=921.8 , ® ®/ WET �' /' ' / IMPERVIOUS SURFACE LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER Inv -904.43 SE ® '� ' ' ' ' ' ' I /'' '' ' ' / / '' EXISTING CONDITION O SF O.O% UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF 9�0 � 1 � \ \1/ I Inv--904.43 NW ' I , \1J Y r, � �r11.5' � O / /' MINNESOTA. 000 \ zo� I I (� ,/' , / �/' PROPOSED CONDITION 47,816 SF 6.0% WE \ sT I //^ 075 \I/ ' ( ) Tc,92 �R c?0, I /WET \ ,� ,•' / / DIFFERENCE EX. VS PROP, 47,816 SF 6.0% s2j e \ I Rim=921.5 04 Q\ \ ��ION LIMITS T 0\1 ZZ I / 180 �� Matthew R. Pavek INV- ./ / c� .S9 �• i ` 914.8 ' / .i'� �' �' �' �' �' �' �' /' ,./ / /,' DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 ' � \1/ 2003 ♦ � �j. "0T4 `4/ \I/ \I/ \1/ \1/ \I/ \1/ \1/ \I/ \I/ `1' `I' ,'' /"' / z'' ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY is �\ S 922 �\9l� `WET ' I i/ INV= 2 20;4� 1.z Qe ht.5 $` o / 11/ \L 11/ 11/ \L \L 11/ \1/ \913.8 \1/ \1/ , ' SITE PLAN LEGEND: ati11. I F 21,1 , ,. • z \1/ ` / I/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ wE�l/ / / TC=921.6 � � �\ \ � �'�wET /''' LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & _,UPLAND AREA _ - 914.1 ' / ' / D \1/ 2109 \I/ / \I/ \l/ R ms 917.4 INV= \4/ \1/ / /"' // / /' / T I 915' EXISTING WETLAND`'' x/ \ 2112 / ,' WEAR COURSE DEPTH SEE DEATIL. RBm=921.6 I 922 U oo a2 / 917.2 i �/ ,�_ BERM wET 2114 `I' `1/`I' Inv --918.46 I \, 9226 9.6 b / w r BOUNDARY (2012) 107 -- - - ---_ -- - N WET r _ / NE / I rr1 , / / s ` � / �Qj 10 NSP\Transmissilan Line \1/ \v- 2117--'� \1/ /' \!/ c,n / ' ' HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEE EXISTING WETLAND ,, '/ WET WET ,� //' GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & �L \� 99?2. BOUNDARY 2018 --- Easement ! / /,' LOT T I Te e2 9�Qy s >>R a ( ) <1\1/ /\1/ 7 \1/ \Icer Doc. No. 3537581 a `\i/ \l;/ �, , \1/ // L WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL. °9,,6' A /y� t 2108 o\ o ,\tx 2118 ; ; �18j wET CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) 92� c r \I/ 1/ \I/ / \I/ \1/ \1/ \I/ \I/ \1/ y SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE , � � � 914.5 CBR ' ' xx1o� WETLAND�PDND ',,10,, '`.�?.,�� �w�/ � � I o /�,• \2 Rim=919.0 WET ' "�s / 918.h Inv -91528 W `I' / \1/ \L \L \1/ NSP Tralasmission.lkine \1// `, �'`�,/\L �. \L fid/ I \1/ o / & CONCRETE DEPTHS SEE DETAIL 4 Easement ; '� <v� ,��� 5 921.8 1 CONS RUGtrzi�.TS I ` � / INV= ® ' co \1/ \I/ \I/ \I/ peq/Doc. No.\I3537562\I/ ,� 9 �. \tr \SSS �,' PROPERTY LINE `� T ; S1uH 210ry'� �' �/ /' 915.1 s2�. Rt , 206 WET `r WET �/ r gzz ♦� \ 6 /n��9 s \1/� . 2122 \4/ \t/ \t/ \1/ \1/ \I/ ;`` /' , \I/ , �V/,' \1/ PARCEL ID: 1 9031 21 21 001 4 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SMH C'0 A R �.: 916 O , 2102 2103 \ /.� ,' ,' / `. / i Rim=921.9 2_g ♦ ori:._ - - `wET -�wET j �cQ _ / �` r 7 / / ,/ Address: 4790 ROSEMARY WAY NORTH Inv -905.94 SE ♦ h /1 ✓' \1/ /\1/ JQ//' \1/ i I OWNER: CHRIST EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH GUTTER-SEEES (T.O.) TIP Inv -905.94 SW 23 rc,s2o. sr ps - / OUT Inv -905.44 NE �4 ��u,sco5 G 9zo », -� _ WET 'y ----------------- GUTTERWHEREAPPLICABLE SEE PLAN Inr-905.40 NW % \ / TCo92 3 '00 g2p, \cVCU=919.9 » _> �� °::.920.0 �_F III�--�� , ES j \I'"s CBR ^ , TC=919.7 is". =919.6 TC �// / , 9 Rim=920.8 cu, R CU- RCP 919.9 / `�• 920.8 _�- O -919.2 <,a TC- 920.5 /\ Inv --917.27 rC�921.0 O �_ �g� a 9 GU=979.3 GU=9197 TC -920.4 /- tio• zo.a y' ,' \ INV=1 INV= \\- X19- _°'' /�� 911 7 911'$ TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS cu_ ----= GU=919.9 ,/ "F���v \1/ R;,h� -s1s. - _ _ - /1 TC=920.49 ; GU=919.4 I ., g��"F=��_� \ / /=920.0 nc /qh 918) C17�� Ig?0//=919.7g\�91GU I� �_--! �6 SMH 7C=9198-919.4 I��gil- / 9T�i"Rim=920.1 Gt Inv -906.75 SE rc=9798-TC=92-.2 R/ /1g �. I SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRES Inv=906.40 NWATC 9 54 X, \GU=919.6 /,/' 9 9` � CBR �0' HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGN / 1 / Rim=918.9 /c=9zo, /R�3�6?�) \� ` NP = NO PARKING FIRE LANInv--914.64 / / Inv --914.64 PARCEL ID: 1903121210016 //' , � ,�' Tc�g'se ` � 1,117 ST = STOP ,'' /'' //' CBR CP .rs, 9 Q ' Lot '�7 CP =COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY Cwner: LA/7 AREA BANK 2� / RInv--915.08=9R \ Inv --915.08 v 5.08 /,/ / /, , / / j/ g7g3 ,ti�'7 v a v Xg919. ADO /' ,•' // /,'' CBR I c xcOex9 ,' /• /,/ Rim=918.8S, co\ g x / Inv--914.86� Cp'Tc\o v Nv 19.2 X90 0 !� O // z /,/ I \ \ Know what's below. 1" = 50'-0" 0111 before you dig. 25'-0" 0 50'-0" 2/14/2019 4:58 PM I I DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION OVERALL SITE PLAN W/ EX. WETLAND BOUNDARIES r1%nawar 2 ■ 0 Q COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. WL Vk 010 OUTLOT I..• � 205 ♦ \\ i ```, ET i 052 ` CONSTRUCTION LIMITS \ Ili I ■ 'o - / \ \ \\\ ; / `` 2�F�_ ■ ♦ v 2 \ x ■ \ ♦♦ /X WECa I II 051 ♦♦\ `\ ``\, � ■ �O, \ WET I I . I■ B612 CONC. FITRATION ♦ \\ \� -- ____- �\\ ■ C&G, TYP. 8 WIDE HVY DUTY CONC. \ BASIN 2B x, ♦ \\ _____--- \ u I ■ No GARAGE APRON WI TRENCH DRAIN \ / ♦ \�---------__- ■ STRUCTURE, SEE UTILITY ♦ `w<, I 0 1 IIE 1 MNI PLAN ----- - " _ �I/ V/ s3 WL®♦w� -_� I zoos I ■ - � ■WL E . R >, \ ♦ Q i R61 XA 1 _ �J ` .. ti 2130 A ...% � XWET . CONC. WALK, ■ \ \ O _ TYP "-------- \\ 3 - 4'X4' CONC. AC ■ \\ CONDENSER PADS, ■ \\ COORD. W/ MECH'L ■ \\\ ® i �� ■ � x gig R I \ I . jDeD V _ fr ■ 2007VY DUI T • - - I BIT. ■ (4) "HOOP STYLE" BICYCLE t,l - - ■ / • o RACKS, SURFACE MOUNT tt -- ---J I' ` _' ' T- - ■ w 06 PER MANUF. SPECS. _� 45 - 4` �Jy�' _C •-�' - --- I / ACCESSIBLE PARKING -- - - / SPACE, INCL. SIGNAGE, - x 917.3 WETS 90, STRIPING AND RAMPS j - ■ �,� �\ R3.0' 0 -- ` ■ ` 16 �r B CONC.`9p, z V \ &G, P 1,o o •• \ .� \ 0 0 ?p. WET ` 20 ■ ,\�� qct c ��sr CONC. WALK, TYP �• ` I , I , WET. TOT LOT, SEE �• V/ �V CONSTRUCTION \ So ARCH. PLANS .�• \ / LIMITS v 10 k,.__INV=�v�6 - \ .\, 914.8 ♦�T � � R44.0' � / ��. r ♦� v. �19, ��� PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND 7 .\ 3. S . UTILITY EASEMENT 8 � ��207� ♦ CONC. 0 � \ ♦\ TRANSF M8 ER PAD, ET- / ♦ OORD. I MECHA ICAL & UTI Y CO. ` I , 2'1' \ FIRE TRUCK TURNING \�♦ / i.1 ET wF MOVEMENT ♦ - / • , �, SITE PLAN LEGEND: ` I AR4.0` I ` I , ` I , I , ` I , LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEE \ �/ I ♦♦ / • / �/ �/ �/ �/ 2109 / " UPLAND AREA GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & \ a \ .♦ / • WET WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DEATIL. GROUND �OUNTED ♦ / °\MONUMENT` I , X_ HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT. SEE SIGN, 5 206 �1/ �/ �/ �/ GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE & 9z�SEE ARH. PLAN line / : WET WEAR COURSE DEPTH, SEE DETAIL. ° --- - - . ® �Q, / • 2107 ' \ • / . WET , - ' - - - - CONCRETE PAVEMENT AS SPECIFIED (PAD OR WALK) / NSP Trans 1 S' SEE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR AGGREGATE BASE s • / BASIN ON �/ �/ / --- / ' Easement & CONCRETE DEPTHS, SEE DETAIL. ��/�O \ , a R;,y I • / -BASIN 2A . — ' per Doc. No. 35 °_ _ K,9 s4 • / - --, - A PROPERTY LINE \, �//�� ¢ • CQNC. WALK, TYP - ; % - ■ M CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ST o • / • 2105 �� z,9 Y �\ a i . WET - CURB AND GUTTER -SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUT ----------------- °9�2z �, �/ \, rs°R • / / �X2108 GUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE -SEE PLAN MATCH ■ �� i • •0. . W068 REMOVE AND REP L�C (� '¢� • T TRAFFIC DIRECTIONAL ARROW PAVEMENT MARKINGS EXISTING PAVEMENT D F _ WEiLANDIPOND 2106 BASE MATERIAL TOM�St CF ;off I v CBR _ T WET NSP Trans �\ EXISTING PAVEMENT S CTIO � Sys Rim=95z8 w I Easement SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY. SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED. \\ FOR UTILITY CONSTRUC ON �` \ ■ Inv-9113.988NE / per Doc. N HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGN \ \ NP = NO PARKING FIRE LANE C2 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS T � I ST = STOP \' `�, a ` . • / m I CP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY \, MA �z1o4 06 CONCRETE DRIVEWAY �` �' c as ���i� R%mH / wET .l ` \„ - _4 - a lnvwg 6.58 206 \ -APRON PER CITY '\, A > is"RCp . - \� ss • AF -' F 2122 0 `ST ND /I TYP. **. / .�` \„ �"`�� ® • 2102 'WET % - - �� �d\ • _ __ 03 ' a �� • -__ - WET - WET - sMH CONCRETE 1\ �� 303 , A>> A Rim =921.9 R, Inv=905.99 SE SIDEWALK PER CITY • Inv 905.94 SW ..� ¢ / \ 4% 4 � 9 � , , .': _ _ • � 206e --= / Inv=905.40 NW \ STANDARDS, TYP. ^� c rc_92p \ - __- ■ 1% �� - - Know what's below. 1" = 20'-0" ©— % \ Call before you dig. 10'-0" 0 20'-0" 2/14/2019 4:58 PM clovo O te C\ G3 \ U p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 M I L L E P HANSON Cn LU M N L0 C") Lf) Z L,) Z W U) a 2 H _j O am W a 0W � az Z 2i Q W co �j a W LL Q LU J W Q z O � J W U H OU W O a_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE No. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY I I DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SITE PLAN C201 COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. NW Corner Outlot B -- Frenchman Place 1st Add. 12024 11/1 \1/ WET 91 8 \1/ \1/ \1/ -2 j1 2029 2026 WE 0/ 2028 �/W�_I/ T 916 6 WET 031 27 21' vp vp I1 WET WET I / / \1 /2022 / j *# 2032 WE WET I I ' 'J/ 2021 *WET X2033 A WET I I \J WETJ d I \ I I' X 2034 I \ I WET I MI 1 2019 , J: WET 20-\ �n I WET o pry l --------- �036 *WE I I 2018 WE I \1 X 2W I WET 7 WET I * 2038 WET � I O \1/i J \1/ \1/ i WET6 I \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 2039 M WET 00 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ y \1/ 00 I I \1/ 2200441 \1/ \1/�x4vE'f \P' \1/ T \ A 0 p°�' - , 2-0 - - \ 2046 _ 2 4 a \ ET WET ET -Ln 't � � I---- ------------------------------- - X� q89°59'50"E 233. WT N WET ------ O I1/ \1/ \1/ \l \ -- -- 4 V) ET "Fr EXISTING WETLANd� \L BOUNDARY - vI/ v4 \ � /'0 r � � 013 v1r vjr vjr �v1/ ET 20 9 r �I WT 21 z' W T VV ET 919 X/OII 100 923 91 WET 100LLJ z 924 92q 923 v!r vjr vjr w v1/ 2 0 = \ 0 Q � I I � 9 * 2 925 0 > \� W i 926 w qz gry5 Mainage &*tility Eas*ment \1' r � \ per Doc. No. 3519170 20A ® ` \1/ 11/ \1/ \1/ 1 X 919.8 1 _ 2007 ` ET , 006 I ET --- ------(1�-' �' --------- SMH 8 um N I �' Rim=921.8 I Inv --904.43 SE Inr`-Y904.23 NW , I 1.2 s \Y 20 r� i \L \L \ WE co res�7 C CBR v Rim=921.5 \ 0 24 �t1ION LIMA`S \ T 09 r tib'. INV= "yos 1. I `1' 914.8 ��06 9q I \ \WFy D IMPACT \ e EA E`- 146 SIF 2�v s S 9220 s222 z �� 21.5 $ v I TLA 9`L2 TV.6 ti� 22 s22 I A`C' 2\ CBR '922 Rim=921.6 \ I GG 9' Inv --918.46 \\\i /CO 9�2 6 y2?6 9,9?? S cG\\ ----------------� TC\g 2?o 2?,3 g6 �\ 0.000 CBR \ 919.1 Q Wt _ 22A �'VD \ INV=� \ 915.1 /' ,/ /// /./� , , / /. j/ /' /,// --915.08 9793 ,ti4'7 v a v ^9919. CBR c cOs79 SMH AREA C Rim=921.9 I Rim=918.8 S oL1 s A RC,o' N 7`90 --905.99 SE J MITIGATION* Inv nr-905.94 SW Inv=914.66 19.2 s7. v Inv -905.44 NE 0.05 Inv -905.40 NW ♦ CBR Rim=920.8 Inv --917.27 PARCEL ID: 1 8031 21 340001 ADDRESS: 15040 EVERTON AVE N OWNER: ROSSINI STEVEN J \1s \1/ \1/707 6 - - - - N87030'30"W 1196.83 9187 2088 0 $6 \N 915.1 2079 WET 914.2 N o 31A, _ 920.3 918.0 \ 17 0 �\1' 2 J \1/� 8 �� _ \� \ 15.4 N - \L gIs\� 978.0 \L \1/ 279 `�'9 '�� 91 j.21 ----- Rear Setback Line w�T _ ; % --- _ 2087 \ ` X 917.7 i i W&L.. \ - \\ Lot Car 11/ \1/ \1/ 11/ 11/ \1/ X 915.7 \1' \ \1/ \/ 'r•\lf -\SiL { 920 2084 WET �\\ Ste\\ \1/ \L \1/ \1/ \L \L 11/ \1/ \L \L \\ \ �0�3 --NV \tyeggs �, \L \1/ \1/ \\ \L \L 6° \ c�\L \1/ \L \1/ \1/ \L \L ` 2082 wET WET'` ;'Wetland Covenant Area per Doc. \1/ ; \1/ C\\� ` No. x,766372 \l, \l, ----\L -- -'�, � � i//= x ^� wET------ UPLAND AREA _--- \i/ \1/ \ --' 15 ; ------X 2089 --- �, \°S`� \ 1 ss ' �(p• \L / D \1/ \L \L \1/ \1/ \L \1/ \1/ \L \L \1/ WET \1/ \L ; '\L \L Slog\ \L `1%\ \1/ \L \1/ \L \L ``\ \ \i' ,/ \i'/ 11 \1/ \LV V \P \I/ \I/ \P \1/ \I/ \L \L \I/ \I/ \L \1/ \I/ \L �L \I/ \I/ \w \1/ \�\D\ \L \ \L WE- ND \L \L \L '�.\I/ / hW 9 -07q" SS�� S �O \1/ 1 \1/ \1/ \1/ `x631 \jr / \jr °,fib` X 9157 \\\ OB�yy\� '��/ 916.2 �I1� \1/ \1/ X 915.4 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ - \1/ -_.� !i'� \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \ \1/ \1/ WF �\ ; \1/ \1/ \1/ 11/ 58`1:1 X 916.3 -------------------- r \ °52r10r- \1/ \1/ ---------- tlj --- \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ / ��\1/ \1/ \1/-\1!- . \I/ SIG . - . ATG / >> S89° 54"E \\ _� Wetland Covenant Area - /� 56��SS ��0,1 � 4 20 lot Cor \ - N89°58' 4'W 251.28 Lot Car a000 \!r ........... ,� per D\cLc. No. 40\619 &( 57620 \1/ _==r -----„ani ------ - / N11° 03 ,` \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/x 916.7 \1/ \1/ \1/ y \1/ \1/ I \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 094 20951/ / �� \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ /o WET i 2046 i W T I \1/ 1 \1/ \1/ 11/ \1/ 093 / f I`S R C E L I D1' 19 031241210 013 \1' \1/ \L \1/ \1/ \L { \L \1/ WET / 1 WET X2-e� UPLAND AREA / \y, \l, X st6� \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ ! \1/ X�b1 / \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 11 I -ID WET _ _ ��X2097 / J WET 2133 WET \1/ (/ \1/ z�c, \1/ WET\1/\ 2098 1/ \1/ \j/ \j/ \1/ \1/ I 2 � WET WET 2100 N O W I\1/",ET I M 2 z NQ \ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ ✓ \9is.s \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \\ \1/ \�I� w w C=j i \ �~� ' 21S 916.8 \\099 c:) v \, \ I I_ \1/ \1/ \1/ { \1/ \1/ \1/ 11/ \1/ WET 11/ \\ 11/ \1/ \1/ 11/ \1/ 00 o Q \ LLA L I \ I Ip w�rC 0f \L 11/ / v D \L \L \L W \L \1/ \1/ \L \L \11 Z \1/ \L \1/ 11/ \1/ (-) z = WE Qom~ I Q � 915.6 \\ � O J \ C X 916.4 \ \!/ 4r� ���� \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ o s>ET Q yPACT \ ' A A' 2*5SF O �- WL �� vp vV v1/ v1/ vjr vjr AV vjr vjr vY I� EXISTIf\�1G WETLAJf\1D 1 `\\ \ � \y.\ BQUNDARY4012) 20 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS \ E v vvv1' EASTING WLTLAND vy vL vL vi. vi. ON v1/ 11/ vv `1' `1' 11/ `U `\ BOUNDARY (2018) \ ♦ X 1 54 \ \Y \1/\1/\1/ ♦ ET `' VETLANn ♦ \\1/ \V ",/ 11/ \t/ ,[� \t/ \L \l/ \l/ \1/ \1/ \l/ ' 1 �,'°° / , \IMPACT x 16.4 \ ♦♦ \1/ A�EAb6 - \1/ _\1/__ _ ----- \ WETLAND \1/ \1/ \1/ \!, xi/ \1/ \i/ • ,/ ' \IMPACT / N83 3'13"E 119 \ \ i\1/ \1/ 06 -J �L T' w �' MEA C - \l/�`` /� `� 0 §F / \ , r16 Q GG(1WEToW\ \ /j�\'"�z�, W�� 9``\`\L \L O "� \1/ \1/ \L ® /0 9zo E � 213 `v / xw ��\r\ \`\\ \jj ��y1 924 ----- \ 11,, >Lv�tcor / 2WOET8 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ /\1/ \j//�� /// ,•, // 4 . \1/ \1/ � 6 N i 2134 WET \/ \1/ \1/ \L \L \1/OW Lot Cor 5 / / 17. , � �'�wET \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ � /' /' � / / / 925 927 9ti �>�/ WET ZZ 926 g2z g,0 •�. .j/ \1/ \1/ \1/� \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ I //'/ /.i'/ / / , / ,1.`I' `I' `I' V `1. `I. `I. `I. `I' `I. // W W W W W W W W W W /' /' ry' 9z° ' / WET4\1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ /,/' / /' /' / / 9m 9ti ' i/ INV= / 9ry 20;4 ;1� _�. �� i \1/ 11/ \L \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \,913.8 \1/ W1E�1/ ` r� 2113,- - Wog \L / ET UPLAND AREA �' Rims 917.4 914.1 ' ,' /' , / ,,/ / / / 9ry5 / m 9 2 91` EXISTING WETLAND ` ` 2112 / 7 �_ wET \1' \1/ // , / w T BOUNDARY (2012) -io7 - -- BERM 2114 ------_ WET / //• NET'- - - _-------------- a \1/ / �Qj 10 NSP\Transmissilan Line \1, EXISTING WETLA'IVD WET WET / T -'" � Easement / �\ � ' � ?///' 0 BOUNDARY (2018 os \per Doc. No. 3537581 WET „/ /x 2108 / \ el 5 WET / WET' �� /211 s2o. i �s� 06 WETLANDIPOND 10 1 wET/ I ET I PACT / wEr N ``�� /11 0 2 9 v1/ v1/ vL vL v/ NSP TralasmissiomiILi e v1/i `v \ [g1'�affi�I S /qr , � Easement �� ``� ��/ RUrftrh '{AATS ` <,.0 \ � / SMH C/ 7 Rim 9920.1 Inv --906.7506.7 06.7 / n5 SE / nv=906.40 NW PARCEL ID: 1903121210016 Cwner. LA/7 ARCA BANK W / w \1/ peq/Doc. No.\j3537562\1/Go zz 206 WE,T� �4WET,WET \1/�.2122 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ PARCEL ID: 1903121210014 2102 _2103 Address: 4790 ROSEMARY WAY NORTH WE WET �1 WLg"�GQ / OWNER: CHRIST EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH WET v // C 92 q / / ES TC -919.7 - 15" RCP TC=919.9 _ p GU=919.2 1-920.3 TC -9204,. 7- GU=919.7.0 20.3 :.._ _ /• ,/ •\ INV= I INV- -9 __ GU=919.9 , 911.7 911.8 GU=919. _ , �i✓ - \1/ R/ih� TC=920.49 GU=919.4 I .-. 1- �g� �'�9 ��_�-� 0� /' 'GU=919.7 1 1- ?p o �J / TC=919.8 TC=979.6 1 G I4�1��I� /� - / 1994"-�•9jg6 =919.7 9 %2 r Re 1 TC=919.8 TC=920.2 G�=91 / i 9 °' iC=320.4 X:1 R CGU=919.6 / g29 \_`°, �'.... CBRR�\�6?S \ ' Rim=918.9 //' ,• /' ' C / j r, ,I'M 117 WETLAND IMPACT TABLE: / g6 �\ 0.000 CBR \ 919.1 Q Wt _ 2018 �'VD ,• ,/ , / / / Z, Rim=919.1 I Inv Cp\ AREA B AD O /' ,/ /// /./� , , / /. j/ /' /,// --915.08 9793 ,ti4'7 v a v ^9919. CBR c cOs79 MITIGATION* AREA C ,•/ // ,/ , /,/ I Rim=918.8 S oL1 s A RC,o' N 7`90 0.04 MITIGATION* '/' Inv=914.66 19.2 s7. v 2,135 0.05 MITIGATION* AREA E 2018 146 0.00 MITIGATION* AREA F 2012 50 v 1 MITIGATION* TOTAL Cj) 7,803 0.18 z U `�^ Cn WETLAND IMPACT TABLE: * NOTE: THIS SITE HAS REPLACEMENT CREDITS TOTALING 18,479 SF FROM TH F LGU AND 0.30 AC FROMTHE CORPS OF ENGINEERS. WETLAND IMPACTS THAT WOULD REQUIRE MITIGATION CAN UTILIZE THE REPLACEMENT CREDITS. 0 fl 0 0 Know what's below. Call before you dig A(! N 1 " = 50'-0" 25-0" 0 50-4- 2/14/2019 4:58 PM O (C�VHO sRote M OO M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 M I L L E P HANSON (n WETLAND IMPACTS SUMMARY YEAR SF AC IMPACTTYPE AREA 2018 2,145 0.05 MITIGATION* AREA B 2018 1,777 0.04 MITIGATION* AREA C 2018 1,550 0.04 MITIGATION* AREA D 2012 2,135 0.05 MITIGATION* AREA E 2018 146 0.00 MITIGATION* AREA F 2012 50 0.00 1 MITIGATION* TOTAL Cj) 7,803 0.18 z * NOTE: THIS SITE HAS REPLACEMENT CREDITS TOTALING 18,479 SF FROM TH F LGU AND 0.30 AC FROMTHE CORPS OF ENGINEERS. WETLAND IMPACTS THAT WOULD REQUIRE MITIGATION CAN UTILIZE THE REPLACEMENT CREDITS. 0 fl 0 0 Know what's below. Call before you dig A(! N 1 " = 50'-0" 25-0" 0 50-4- 2/14/2019 4:58 PM O (C�VHO sRote M OO M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 M I L L E P HANSON (n I 111111111110111111 1 Z UU N Lf') N CY) Cj) z 1■1� z U `�^ Cn QL 2H � O a 0 W Q LU 0.z z O 2 Q co J a W Q QW LU J W Cn Q 0 Z � J UU LID Cn (10 H OU W 0 (Y d I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM MY DIRECT A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE No. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION PROPOSED WETLAND IMPACTS ■ COPYRIGHT 2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP IN 41r Ik 1' 4V �— 0% z w Uj r LU Know what's below. 0111 before you dig. V=60'4' 30'-0" 0 60'-0" 2/14/2019 4:58 PM (C070 �Hsote R m Oo M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 M I L L E P HANSON (n �ME I Z LU M N Lr) M U Z L,) Z W T a HO am O W aaz W z _ 0 2 Q�co �j a W oc �w a a 2 J W � � 0 2 U) O z 11� J LU u7 co �OU LU) O Elf a_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION ADJACENT PARCEL MAP C203 COPYRIGHT 2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. 1 w 91 I I . I TOP OF 1 BERM ` I � �T1 i 25.65 \V � �� • g21 ■rn � I■ 2� 92� 923 -_ ■ I °0� 1.06 \Y I ■ wry", � ■ I■ 21.06 ■ I 22.95 I � I ■ 1 I 95 o 1 I 0�� 1 `I' I■ I ��� 1� 2009 I■ 925 25.24"/l 1 WET ■ ■ 00926 29.41 I25.72 25.72 I• _ I 1 1 � I I N • N \ rn 28.84 • 8.8 - I 0 N °' 28.50 XL�HP I 28.02 H�28 28 4 27.89 I I N� �k 2E I I I I • X 919.8 I : 27.16 / I I _ I k J . 27.0 �I 2006 . N I 26.91 I 26.47 i9 1 • N Cr) C14 rn . 26.47 \ WL : N 2.58 cr 25.74 CONSTRUCTION \� \\ LIMITS . \ \ 25.20 \ _INV= \ 914.8 \ 9�0 \\ Ak \\ \ \ \ `I, I979 •� 4 41 \ 2,9 • SMH Rim=921.9 Inv --905.99 SE Inv=905.94 SW Inv --905.44 NE Inv --905.40 NW / �/ �/ �/ i �/ ``, GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 0 0 0 • Teo \ \\ O U � \ 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT &GENERAL GRADING NOTES. \ \ CM M O M p • \\ \� \� \� \� \� \� \\� 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture _-921 \\ I \ \ / LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN 4931 W 35th Street Suite 200 X922 / 92s Q 25.65 \ -19.36 25.50 ON ,�C_111111 r 052 CONgTRUCTION LIMITS \\ / ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING St. Louis Park, MN 55416 SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 1\V \V / \V RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS \ / / ENGINEER. 3. GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE �. ---\ `\ \V \V \V \V \V / \V �/ NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & X17.0 \\ I II PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. MWF \\ 2654 `9� •� \3 WE \ / 4. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW -LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE properties 9 NOTED. 9"0 •� \� \V �\ \V \V V/ l \V V/ �`. \V . / �� • �' �\ \\ X 916.4 l/ 5. GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND �. TOP OF \--- \ \ �\ 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. .\T7' ; \\\ �________---- C `\\ 6. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. •� \ \\ \\ \ M I L L E P MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:1 FILT. BASIN 2B \ \\ \ •• w _ \� BOT=920.00 0 1 ..E 1 �9 IN \ \\ \ I 7. PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES \ 0E=920.60 83 HANSON W `�\✓ �/ \\\V \V GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING i \ EOF=922.15 WL 1 _ \ 0 r C h I t e C t S \ 100 -YR HWL=921.52 WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO -� E \ ` CONSTRUCTION. ■ ■ 'a' \\� \OF\� 8. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT 91 ■ \ \" P THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL 1 918 ■ \ ■ ■ ■ ■ ,. \,� \\ ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE 20"920 �'� \ I ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES. L \ 91 \ 921 92 � \\ �� 9. IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL 922 . \ \\ w EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT 92 \ O - \ ` SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. \ \ wErs 920 921 , \ \ s1 \ 10. EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR \ \\ 920 }-« ■� \� \\ 2130 RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT �\ �� k2'EN 921 XWET AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL � \\\ � �\ \\ \\ \\ \ \ ��\�23 ,,,-■ / `\� SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD - ------ -- ■ I/ \\\ TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. \ \ \ \ \ 925 ■ I 11\.\ FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS W \ \ N rn ■ I \ WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH M \ \ \�\ \ _ ■ I FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES � \ \ \ ®LLS T -N; 25.50 ■ I BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING \ \ \ LJr,�� \�� �-� ■ I GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT M Z __ \ \ \ - `- ■ CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME _ N LO °o ■ I RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL --- \ °' °' AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR Z W J I BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK. Q O ` \ - J ■ I 12. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE am W y, ' \ - ■ STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED W Z -TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BEAT THE T a - 1 �Nr \\ \ \ ` \\ '\ = ■ / DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE / �� \ ` \ \ \ \ \ I\,\` _ ■ // SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR Q (n \ \ \ \\ \ �\! ■ / PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN �j a W \ \ \ \ > DOOR DACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR i DOO� � � 26.50 24.31 ■ / / WITHIN 10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS. Q LL Q W / J °j ■ / \l/ 13. TOLERANCES cb W Q 29.16 13.1. THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN Z \ / / / / / / �/ / 29 9 G �•� ,� / 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE 0 J \ // / / �' // // / / / j MEASUREMENT IS MADE. L0 13.2. THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY LU CD 927 1 / BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OFCn ti ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. �' 10/ / / / 9\8�� / 13.3. AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR O BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. U -/ W 9?tA j 13.4. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. O 9'\9 �•• \I/ \I/ \I/ W W W 14. MAINTENANCE a_ / / / / .• / ' 14.1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY 14.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF THE WARRANTY PERIOD, ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE MINNESOTA. RESEEDED AND MULCHED. ET_ % 20_77- / A/ 14.3. WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, Matthew R. Pavek _ �•• W1 ,M T -A7 2111 AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION. DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE No. 44263 i.. ��o \� \� \� \� \� \ / WET \� ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY 03 DATE DESCRIPTION i 2/15/19 CITY SUBMITTAL TOP OF \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ ,� . BERM W W W W W J109 UPLAND AREA 23.15 ♦ 915.7 r ♦ / \V j�WWETET . I 2107 ' `------ / WET NSP Tran! W1 Easement - per Doc. I EROSION CONTROL NOTES: GRADING PLAN LEGEND: SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0-SW1.5 I 2105 -------- ------ EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL / I I WET 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL I I / GROUNDWATER INFORMATION: \--41.26 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE WET 11 PER GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY CHOSEN VALLEY TESTING, INC., DATED 11-19-18 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK .p2�2E.27 a; / ` \ �\ I I GROUNDWATER WAS OBSERVED AT ELEVATIONS RANGING FROM 907.00 TO 915.00 891.00 G SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTER PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 M1 • 922 \ 21'98 / `�j - '-- °' ' i 9745 891.00 TC SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB REVISION SUMMARY E. 2 .51° 2 11 P THE BORINGS & GROUNDWATER ARE AS FOLLOWS: \� #// \\\ \ 169NSP 5 P W B-01 911.00 \V \V \1/ Ease 891.00 BS/TS SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS DATE DESCRIPTION Inv- 914.28 S B-02 914.00 per I Inv=913.98 NE B-03 914.00CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) -------------------- �� ` 19 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS B-04 914.50 \V / B-05 914.00 \/ \1/ \ 21.92 ���. B-06 NOT ENCOUNTERED \,\\ 22104 B-07 NOT ENCOUNTERED 922 • 2 / wET B-08 903.00 \C \ \ TOP OF / 92 rn os7 \I \� B-09 NOT ENCOUNTERED 3 V BE �� \ i Rcp ��� g23 92 BERM 23.15 �3'1 ��y a�3� �>�'> - WPI - CITY OF HUGO GRADING NOTES: --- �...... _ -� � � WET - .�4)� 3,7,E \� � X2oss/11 oe L 00 rc,s20g '\ ��y_ ' ■ ■ ■ WET 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC GRADING NOTES. - 921 ---- - / �C cu 9 lJ» _ >> \ ° » - a a 920.0° / d a\ EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EOF=1135.52 GRADING PLAN 0�° o N Know what's below. 1" = 20'-0" Cal before you dig. 10'-0" 0 20'-0" C300 2/14/2019 4:58 PM 0 COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. Y/ I - '`` 11 �077/�/ + WL o 0 ♦ OT ; `,, GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: R'te f O � I 0 0 •• � ♦ \ ; , 1. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. (MG3 O M Civil I • / � � �/ \ � / �1/ �1/ �1/ �1/ '�1/ �1/ Engineering ' Surveying ' Landscape Architecture I •• ♦ `\ /2. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 fill CONSTRUCTION LIMITS °52 AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL St. Louis Park, MN 55416 !� P' .. ♦ ` IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE civilsitegroup.Com 612-615-0060 PLANS. DT CLEANOUT, \\\ 3. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER � TYP. \ ♦ \\\ STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS ` PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY �,; � ■ IE=918.00 \ � `v '�, i `�, ♦ vv �, UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.MWF I\ ♦ z, \`\ 4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD ♦♦ WE \\ I SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARYSEWER AND STORM SEWER properties V/ I • ♦ V/ \\�\ V/ ��� V/ V/ V/ �V ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA NCEAM , ANOD SHA N" AS PREPARED CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS I■ /� ` ♦♦ \ FES 1 ( )' \ = ♦ £` \`\ IE -917.00 OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. ` 6 DT ♦ \ INSTALL MNDOT 5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE -USED OR , ♦ \ _ -, LA III RIP RAP _ . CLASS _ PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. I 6" PERF. PVC i ` I , ■ @ 0.00% \ ♦' \ MH 42` 6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, M I L L E P u I \ ` NEENAH R-2501 \\ IE=918.00 ♦ RIM=922.15 19 LF 12" HDPE \ AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. � . I r TRENCH DRAIN \" IE (6" PVC)=920.60 8�° RM @ 5.26% \\\ 7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & HANSON RIM=918.86 (6 DT \ = x � ® ♦ � � IE )-918.00 , ' - '� 8 LF 6" SCH40 PVC \\ �, F679, OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785,2665, ASTM F794,1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I. ® BOT=916.86 \ \ • ... ---- - ♦ IE (N)=918.00 4� TORM @ 7.50% \ 2009 E 8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC W0 � CONNECT TO INTERIOR �'-� /zos � �`- -W�- DT CLEANOUT `. X - 'FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I. ;y BUILDING MECH'L PUMP, \ \ �T ■ ■ ■ TYP. \ \\ V/ VAX SEE MECH'L PLANS \ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ,� IE -918.00 9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF I: 1.48 CFS PEAK FLOW \ ` \ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ ��°\\ FLARED END SECTION. • 2056 FES 41 ♦ �„�\\ 10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE I E=920. 0 PROVIDE SPLASH BLOCK FOR � �' �/ ^ J/ � � \ �/ CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING I INSTALL MNDOT �,t\ BUILDING ROOF DRAIN, \ CLASS III RIP RAP Q� LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. _ COORD. LOCATION WITH V -\-- -- •- : / � ♦ \ 11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE BUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL ARCH., TYP. :x•. \ \\IlkCATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM CB 15 \{ \ \� ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 12" NYLOPLAST }� =' T vv `� Cn i \ 12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS � AUb DRAIN BASIN WITH � � ���{ }_� ��X12" NYLOPLAST \ OTHERWISE NOTED. w T : PED. GRATE ` 'WET° \ � T 13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY RIM=928.22 O - - - \� REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL. INV=923.72 O \ 14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS ♦ -�®r7- - ■ \\ 8" COMBINED DIP WATER OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" LU M \ VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH II I I ♦ � �xK � \ \ ♦ STUB SANITARY TO 5' \ WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. N SERVICE AND VALVE, STUB CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE2 ♦ FROM BUILDING `, IZT ' FROM BUILDING, dr ALL FINAL AREA DRAIN AND I 15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL L0 ♦ IE @ STUB=915.00 TO WITHIN 5JAL DT CLEANOUT, 6" DT - ♦ COORD. W/MECH'L COORD. W/MECH L SPLASH BLOCK (DOWNSPOUT) TYP. 6" PERF. PVC SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. I ♦ LOCATIONS W/ ARCHITECT @ M z IE=918.00 0.00% 16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY 2007 ♦ AD 23B : - - __ n - IE=918.00 Liz v T ♦ 8 LF 8" PVC SCH40 --- 'I `- ---r}- _ ___ _ � :J I STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. Lo W J _ / L__ STORM @ 2.00% MH 23 = --- I ; �- - - ; JT 17. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE -DRILLED. / \ NEENAH R-1642 _ = Yy . 0 ♦ RIM -928.90 18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE IZ 6" STORM SERVICE, _ am O LL LU ♦ IE (E/S)=921.52 -- , . MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. / STUB TO WITHIN 5' - �" I„- . " = W z ♦ IE (W/NW/N)=924.40 --` 4__ `� a, X2006 FROM BUILDING, _ 19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES a z W$T 137 LF 8" SC 0 COORD. W/MECH'L I==- MH 24 - WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. _ 1 NON -PERF C BLDG IE=924.66 I; 1� NEENAH R-1642 �j , /✓���/// @ 54% STUB IE=924.56 W AD 23D RIM=927.00 / 2.076 � 20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS Q (n AD 23A AD 23C 108 LF 8" SCH40 PVC IE (W)=922.60 - ■ OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC a LU o IE (NE)=923.10 `}_ CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED > INSTA 2-20 LF OF �� STORM @ 1.00 /° AD 23E ,1;; �'/ PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC U. Q f� h, . 4 DT ELOW BASE CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE Q LL] LAYE TYP. ` I LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL 2 J PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURESW 0 < • SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. z ■O �11 ETDT CLEANOUT, TYP. 005 2•X 21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES � J•� •• ,��' � � WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. Uj 'IT DT CLEANOUT, TY � IE -925.96 � �x �o7s / WET STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS IE=925.88 ° SET CASTING 6"• o • � SET CASTING 6" �� '-- � BELOW SURFACE .• � %� ' FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 202 CB 14 BELOW SURFACE � WET MH 22 � 53 LF 12" HDPE •• �� � ` 1122. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. U) T NEENAH R -3067V _ • '� V/ V/ CONSTRUCTION RIM -925.20 NEE A R-16 15 LF 4 DT STORM @ 1.00% .• 23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO U O \ RIM= .00 4" PERF. PVC 23 LF 4 DT - • , / UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS w LIMITS IE (SE)=921.11 DT CLEANOUT, TYP. 4" PERF. PVC ••• IE (NE)=921.61 I /S) 99 1.00% TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. O \ : E(( =923.IE=925.73 @ 1.00% •• / I , ` I ` I � \� IE MP=916 9 SET CASTING 6" •• V/ V/ V/ 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALL SA BAFFL ND ` BELOW SURFACE .• SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, HOOD PER MANUF PECS20 LF 4" DT - •• 25. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS � PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT ` I , HY . & GV P R 4" SOLID PVC 13.65% • WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY IV CITY STAN RDS 45 LF 12" MH 2 @ ••�• /Xiw 74 WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES. LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER ♦ \ 233 LF 8 PVC SDR HDPE STORM NEENAH R-2501 • • //i UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF ♦♦ 26 SAN SERV. @ @ 2,20% �, RIM=922.80 • 26. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE MINNESOTA. \ 3.24% IE (6" PVC)=920.50 •� g BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN ` ♦ IE -920.00 FES 21 IE (6" DT) -917.00 ••207- = X20- / / 7 V/ V/ \i/ \l/ RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0. ET - IE (E)=917.00 •/! Matthew R. Pavek 83 LF 15" HDPE ♦ 8" D�EROE MBINED INSTALL MNDOT • ' STORM @ 1.50% W ICE CLASS III RIP RAP - CITY OF HUGO UTILITY NOTES: DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE No. 44263 �♦ / :�� /35 LF 1 "HDPE \ I / 2111 WET \ ♦♦ / STORM @ 1.43% \Y `1/ 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC UTILITY NOTES. ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY - DATE DESCRIPTION INSTALL 2-20 LF OF ♦ / FES 1 , - / 2/15/19 CITY SUBMITTAL 4" DT BELOW BASE ♦ IE=916.50- / � ♦ � � � � INSTALL MNDOT � � � � w09 LAYER, TYP. � , / UPLAND AREA \ ,� ♦- - CLASS III RIP RAP / CBMH 13 ♦ / / NEENAH \ R -3067V 4 '� ♦ 11 LF 6" SCH40 PVC 922 RIM=924.57 I ♦ / .i STORM @ 9.09% \ , I E=919.87 41 . , '-----------""" / 2107 \ ` WET 40 LF 18" HDPE / FES 3 / - - - \\ STORM @ 1.50% �/ ` I , I I , - \ NSP Trans�nl 27 LF 18 HDPE . IE=919.50 �1/ �/ �1/ / Easement v/ �\1 O \INSTALL 2-20 LF OF STO4M @ 1.00%" -*,INSTALL MNDOT / - per Doc. No. 3. S \ "' T BELOW BASE / CLASS III RIP RAP �. ° 4 \ �/� �AYER, TYP. UTILITY LEGEND: 2105 WET CATCH BASIN 100, DT CLEANOUT, 7 \ ° ♦♦ �\ i TYP. \ \ ♦ IE=917.00 \° ♦ I CBR \ �, \\ ♦ -� Rim 915.2 2 `� ♦ =9 919.0 �\ MAKE CONNECTION TO \• IInvnv=998 S 54.13.98 NE EXISTING SANITARY, SEWER MANHOLECONSTRUCTION LIMITS I , EX IE (NW)=905.40 °�\/ Q M:� ��" V/ EX IE (SE)=905.99 6 DT 6 EX IE SW =905 94 ��, _ \ ♦ PERF. PVC �z1°a AREA DRAIN SCHEDULE (SEE DETAILS) AREA DRAIN NUMBER RIM INVERT WYE / MH INV. PIPE SIZE AND MATERIAL PIPE LENGTH (FT) PIPE SLOPE (FT/FT) AD23A 929.06 924.67 924.40 6" PVC SCH40 27 0.0100 AD 23B 929.41 924.60 924.40 6" PVC SCH40 10 0.0200 AD 23C 929.41 923.13 921.93 6" PVC SCH40 10 0.1200 AD 23D 929.41 923.36 922.16 6" PVC SCH40 10 0.1200 AD 23E 929.41 923.71 922.51 6" PVC SCH40 10 0.1200 AD 24A j 926.50 j 923.27 j 923.10 j 6" PVC SCH40 j 17 j 0.0100 PR IE STUB (NE)=905.44 92 4 �' PROPOSED GATE • �\ R%m ye PROPOSEDl p @ 0.00% Tc'92 �� �\ °�916SB IE -917.00 UTILITY PLAN (FIELD VERIFY) VALVE AND VALVE BO s V/ �' _ CBMH 12 ��� � ' 0 \- NEENAH R -3067V`' MAKE WET TAP �� \, o$ FES 11 92, 3 - I E=919.00 --- X .8- VF_ Rm"=921.9 CONNECTION TO RIM=923.43 3 Inv--905.99 SE _ •� IE=919.27 0 INSTALL MNDOT a �$ Inv --905.94 SW EXISTING WATER 0 Inv --905.44 NE • IE SUMP=915.27 0 CLASS III RIP RA �' a szo.e{ / , Inv --905'40 NW MAIN, COORD. WITH \ \ ST „ a ^ >> Know what's below. 1" = 20'-0" CITY INSTALL SAFL BAFFLE AND `\ _ / / / HOOD PER MANUF. SPECS,----/ `\ ro' o�"� °aa 4 �� --- ___ Call before you dig. 10-0 0 20-0 C400 \ / » -. , d a. 920.0°. a a ----------- ----------- �y - Q COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ;� » -- JE ------- -' ° - - 2/14/2019 4:58 PM c MANHOLE DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK ►� GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT REVISION SUMMARY IWATER MAIN DATE DESCRIPTION SANITARY SEWER >> STORM SEWER or FES AND RIP RAP PR IE STUB (NE)=905.44 92 4 �' PROPOSED GATE • �\ R%m ye PROPOSEDl p @ 0.00% Tc'92 �� �\ °�916SB IE -917.00 UTILITY PLAN (FIELD VERIFY) VALVE AND VALVE BO s V/ �' _ CBMH 12 ��� � ' 0 \- NEENAH R -3067V`' MAKE WET TAP �� \, o$ FES 11 92, 3 - I E=919.00 --- X .8- VF_ Rm"=921.9 CONNECTION TO RIM=923.43 3 Inv--905.99 SE _ •� IE=919.27 0 INSTALL MNDOT a �$ Inv --905.94 SW EXISTING WATER 0 Inv --905.44 NE • IE SUMP=915.27 0 CLASS III RIP RA �' a szo.e{ / , Inv --905'40 NW MAIN, COORD. WITH \ \ ST „ a ^ >> Know what's below. 1" = 20'-0" CITY INSTALL SAFL BAFFLE AND `\ _ / / / HOOD PER MANUF. SPECS,----/ `\ ro' o�"� °aa 4 �� --- ___ Call before you dig. 10-0 0 20-0 C400 \ / » -. , d a. 920.0°. a a ----------- ----------- �y - Q COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ;� » -- JE ------- -' ° - - 2/14/2019 4:58 PM c NOTE: SECTION IS FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY, REFER TO GEOTECH FOR FINAL PAVEMENT X" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA340C) TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357) X" BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330C) X" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASE (MNDOT 3138) III III I III — - COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OF STANDARD SECTION. 11=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY) e -%O\ HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NTS NOTE: SECTION IS FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO GEOTECH FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTION. X" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA340B) TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357) X" BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330B) X" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASE (MNDOT 3138) COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY) LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NTS 6" RADIUS 12" DIAMETER 6" LINE WIDTH 3" LINE WIDTH 5-6" SQUARE OVERALL 18" RADIUS ALL COLORS TO MATCH ADA STANDARD COLORS ACCESSIBLE PARKING PAVEMENT MARKING NTS CD CID EXTEND POST PAST TOP OF POST GALVANIZED STEEL FASTENER (TYP. OF 2) METAL SIGN ACCORDING TO MN STATE CODE GREEN POWDER COATED STEEL SQUARE POST AS SPECIFIED 6" O.D. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE PAINTED WITH 1 COAT OF APPROPRIATE PRIMER AND TWO COATS SIGN ENAMEL. FILL ANNULAR SPACE WITH GROUT. COVER WITH YELLOW "IDEAL SHIELD" PLASTIC COVER. 10 DEGREE SLOPE MATERIAL VARIES -SEE PLAN 1 INCH SILICONE RUBBER OR ASPHALTIC CAULKING COMPOUND FILL ANNULAR SPACE TO 1 INCH FROM TOP WITH SILICA SAND 1/4" METAL PLATE WELDED TO BOTTOM OF 6" PIPE KiP►[y:1�l�YiZ�1t�IP[e7F�9�xy1�1��] NOTE: 1. SIGN SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED. 2. VERIFY POST PAINT COLOR WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ACCESSIBLE SIGN AND POST NTS OO O (C h 7 R a R � Om E O M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-515-0060 MILLER HANSON Cn FM z LU 2FM Q am a Nt M 't U')'^ v♦ Ln LU � W_ O � W _ IL > O a. Q LL U elf M N IZT L0 Ln z 2 C J 0- LUz z 2 C LU LU __J 0 J Ln CO ti I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION CIVIL DETAILS C500 2/14/2019 4:58 PM 0 COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. MTENCRETE MATCH POINTS SHALL BE SAW CUT AND HAVE EXPANSION PAD UNLEl3S OTHERWISE DIRECTED BY THEFr 6" DISTANCE TO CL VARIABLE GINEER PROPERTY LINE 1/2" R NCRETE SHALL HAVE A SLUMP OF 3" OR LESS, A 7 -DAY STRENGTH OF AT LEAST 2,000 PSI AND A 28 DAY 3" R COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF 3,900 PSI 0.5' 8' 1' 3. ALL BITUMINOUS MATCH POINTS SHALL BE SAW CUT OR MILLED AND TACKED PRIOR TO PATCHING. ON ROADS WERE } f a �3 BITUMINOUS IS 3" THICK OR GREATER THE TOP 1.5" SHALL BE MILLED A MINIMUM OF 18" BEYOND THE SAW CUT AS A MATCH 1/2" R POINT. SLOPE 3/4"/FT. N ° Mn/DOT B 618 4. GRAVEL AND BITUMINOUS IN ROADWAY AREA SHALL BE REPAIRED TO A LIKE NEW CONDITION MATCHING EXISTING -- THICKNESS. SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT TO DRAIN _ . 4i5. .: -A BITUMINOUS PATCH WORK DONE PRIOR TO JUNE 1ST AND AFTER SEPTEMBER 30TH SHALL BE HEATED WITH A RADIANT HEATER TO SEAL THE EDGES. \ /�\ \ \//\\//\ .a 6. ALL DRIVEWAYS WITH A GRADER GREATER THEN 10% MUST OBTAIN CITY ENGINEER APPROVAL. /� /�� /� /� / , / , \ /� / .. I� 8" 18" 7. ALL DRIVEWAYS MUST MEET CITY CODE FOR LOT COVERAGE AREA. ,\ 8. NO DRIVEWAY SHALL BE WITHIN 40' OF A STREET END RADIUS UNLESS WRITTEN APPROVAL IS OBTAINED FROM THE CITY 3" TYPE 9.5 WEAR COURSE MIX (2,B) ENGINEER. (SPWEA240B) 6" DISTANCE TO CL VARIABLE 9. WHERE SIDEWALKS / TRAILS EXISTS OR ARE PROPOSED, THE DRIVEWAY SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE SIDEWALK/ TRAIL 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE 100% CRUSHED 1/2" R 3„ R AREA WITH PEDESTRIAN CURB OPENINGS PLACED (SEE STANDARD PLATE NO. HU-STR-4). A MAXIMUM 2% CROSS SLOPE ON LIMESTONE QUARRY OR RECYCLED EQUAL SIDEWALK / TRAIL AREAS CROSSING THROUGH DRIVEWAYS. (MnDOT 3138) 1 10.CONTRACTOR TO CALL CITY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT (651) 762-6316 PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC FOR ROOT CONTROL TO BE PLACED 3 1/2" R F UNDER CLASS 5 AGGREGATE `�' SLOPE 314"IFT. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO BE BIOBARRIER OR APPROVED -- Mn/DOT B 624 4 EQUAL .. �° • �. ° a �' ti• .. °'. NOTE: a THE FINAL WEAR COARSE LIFT SHOULD BE PLACED UPON 90-95% COMPLETION a.. '' • . e CURB RADIUS 25' OF ALL HOME CONSTRUCTION. BACK CURB 8' 24 �I AL TYPICAL BIKE PATH TYPICAL SECTION FELT EXPANSION FELT EXPANSION PAD 28" R 16 PAD 12" R MAINTAIN GUTTER WITH 3/4" 68" R TOP OF BITUMINOUS MAT LIP ALONG WIDTH OF L..1/2" DRIVEWAY OPENING. I 'v PROPERTY LINE Q .n' °� MODIFIED 'S' DESIGN ° + SAW CUT EXISTING BITUMINOUS 24" MIN 18" MIN. MILLED AREA o .°d. •. G ° ' BASE 17 1/2" 10 1/2" RADIANT HEAT PATCH AREA ON ALL — PATCHES PLACED PRIOR TO JUNE IST OR SLOPE 1/4" PER FOOT TO DRAIN 28 AFTER SEPTEMBER 30TH 6" DISTANCE TO CL VARIABLE CONCRETE VARtES 1/2" R CURB &GUTTER SLOPE ORNEWAY SLO '4" CONCRETE (3A32A) 3" R SLOPE WHEN SIDEWALK I TRA. CROSS DRIVEWAY%4" PER FOOT e= v ` -' ° e ' 4" FINE FILTERED AGGREGATE DER CLASS 5 1 CROSSES ' )100% 3 I— 2' MIN. 3/4" LIP A , , - . e ' o . ' ;,> . '' ' ' AGGREGATE CRUSHED ' LIMESTONE QUARRY OR N a -- SLOPE 314"/FT. 1/2" R Mn/DOT B 612 < - CONCRETE 6"RECYCLED o::,24 EQU,4L (MnDOT 3138) a ' ' <' o. THICKNESS TYPICAL ° ' CLASS 5 100% CRUSHED 'NOTE: • : n «'' STREET PATCH 2' BY LENGTH OF CURBING 6" THICKNESS TYPICAL 6" THICK SIDEWALK IS REQUIRED THROUGH DRIVEWAY I� 8" 12" REMOVED AND REPLACED (MATCH CONTRACTION JOINT AREAS,. EXISTING THICKNESS) SIDEWALK CROSSING ONLY NOTES: SAWED OR PREFORMED 1. MINIMUM OF 3" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER ALL SIDEWALK TYPICAL SECTION CURB AND GUTTER OF Special Details Dd1e Special Details CITY OF COMMERCIAL/MULTI FAMILYDa1e CITY OFCONCRETE BIKE PATH AND Special Details Date04-01-15 LIMIGO 04-01-15 04-01-15 CURB & GUTTER HU—STR-2B CONCRETE DRIVEWAY DETAILHU—STR-8B � SIDEWALK TYPICAL SECTIONS HU—STR-9 Revised: Revised Revised: 01-20-17 EST. 1906 01-20-17EST.1906 01-20-17 \� O SPECIFICATIONS: SUBMIT PLAN TO CITY OF HUGO PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF SIGNS, W&L4ND Ct BUFFLRMATERIAL AND WORDS MAY CHANGE EXISTING GROUND LINE MONUMENT: APPROVED BACKFILL MATERAIL (VAR. DEPTH TO TOP OF PIPE) NOCONSISTS OF A POST AND A WETLAND BUFFER SIGN M WING ALLOVI�ED WETLAND BUFFER SIGNS: NORMAL TRENCH SLOPE IN AREAS OF SUITABLE FOUNDATION MOUNTED FLUSH WITH THE TOP OF THE POST FASTENED WITH 3/8" DRIVE MATERIAL RIVETS AND NYLON WASHERS SIZE: 12" H x 8" W ALUMINUM SHALL BE 1 1 5052-H38 OR 6061-T6 ALLOY. GAUGE SHALL BE 0.080 1 2 PIPE SPRING LINE SUITABLE POST MATERIALS: 2' MIN. 4' MAX AS ONSITE GRANULAR 2" X 2" X 8' TELSPAR POST DIRECTED BY THE 1 . MATERIAL ENGINEER 1 O + GEOTEXTILE FABRIC ° POST INSTALLATION: - MOUNTED TO A HEIGHT OF FOUR FEET ABOVE GRADE SET AT LEAST 42 PIPE BACKFILL AS DIRECTED INCHES IN THE GROUND INSTALLED PER APPROVED PLAN. BY THE ENGINEER O U) 3/4" TO 1-1/2" 100% CRUSHED FOUNDATION 0 a MATERIAL OR APPROVED GRANULAR O N x MATERIAL, WRAP WITH GEOTEXTILE FABRIC, ORIENT LENGTH OF ROLL PERPENDICULAR V TO PIPE AND OVERLAP SIDES AND END 3 FEET NOTES: 1. 0.063" THICK ALUMINUM SIGN. WHITE LETTERS ON GREEN HIGH INTENSITY PRISMATIC REFLECTORIZED BACKGROUND. 2. 2" x 2" TELSPAR POST, MINIMUM 3 FEET BURY DEPTH AND MINIMUM 3 FEE ABOVE EXISTING GROUND. � CITY OF STRUCTURE MARKER Special Details Date. 04_01_15 � CITY OF WETLAND BUFFER Special Details Date: 04-01-1.`i /, CITY OF TYPICAL TRENCH FOR Special Details Date: SIGNS HU—SIG-1� MARKER HU—SIG--2 04-01-15 Revised: Revised: ' UNSTABLE FOUNDATION MSC FST. 1906 01-20-17 r;5.1. 1906 01-20-1 EST. 1906 -1 Revised: 01-20-17 NOTE: SECTION IS FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY, REFER TO GEOTECH FOR FINAL PAVEMENT X" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA340C) TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357) X" BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330C) X" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASE (MNDOT 3138) III III I III — - COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OF STANDARD SECTION. 11=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 1=1 PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY) e -%O\ HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NTS NOTE: SECTION IS FOR BIDDING PURPOSES ONLY. REFER TO GEOTECH FOR FINAL PAVEMENT SECTION. X" WEAR COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPWEA340B) TACK COAT (MNDOT 2357) X" BASE COURSE (MNDOT 2360 - SPNWB330B) X" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE SUBBASE (MNDOT 3138) COMPACTED SUBGRADE (100% OF STANDARD PROCTOR MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY) LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT NTS 6" RADIUS 12" DIAMETER 6" LINE WIDTH 3" LINE WIDTH 5-6" SQUARE OVERALL 18" RADIUS ALL COLORS TO MATCH ADA STANDARD COLORS ACCESSIBLE PARKING PAVEMENT MARKING NTS CD CID EXTEND POST PAST TOP OF POST GALVANIZED STEEL FASTENER (TYP. OF 2) METAL SIGN ACCORDING TO MN STATE CODE GREEN POWDER COATED STEEL SQUARE POST AS SPECIFIED 6" O.D. GALVANIZED STEEL PIPE PAINTED WITH 1 COAT OF APPROPRIATE PRIMER AND TWO COATS SIGN ENAMEL. FILL ANNULAR SPACE WITH GROUT. COVER WITH YELLOW "IDEAL SHIELD" PLASTIC COVER. 10 DEGREE SLOPE MATERIAL VARIES -SEE PLAN 1 INCH SILICONE RUBBER OR ASPHALTIC CAULKING COMPOUND FILL ANNULAR SPACE TO 1 INCH FROM TOP WITH SILICA SAND 1/4" METAL PLATE WELDED TO BOTTOM OF 6" PIPE KiP►[y:1�l�YiZ�1t�IP[e7F�9�xy1�1��] NOTE: 1. SIGN SHALL BE AS SPECIFIED. 2. VERIFY POST PAINT COLOR WITH LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. ACCESSIBLE SIGN AND POST NTS OO O (C h 7 R a R � Om E O M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-515-0060 MILLER HANSON Cn FM z LU 2FM Q am a Nt M 't U')'^ v♦ Ln LU � W_ O � W _ IL > O a. Q LL U elf M N IZT L0 Ln z 2 C J 0- LUz z 2 C LU LU __J 0 J Ln CO ti I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION CIVIL DETAILS C500 2/14/2019 4:58 PM 0 COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. PROPERTY LINE/ RIGHT OF WAY DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT I MINIMUM OF 10 COVER OVER TOP OF PIPE AT 1' I PROPERTY LINE 4" MIN } I 5 4" OR 6" PVC SCH. 40 RISER CONCRETE ENCASEMENT (TYPICAL) **45° BEND 6„ ELEV TO BE SET SEE JOINT DETAIL BELOW MIN BY THE ENGINEER PROPERTY LINE/ PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED RIGHT OF WAY AND SHALL HAVE CLASS "B" BEDDING WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER �t CITY OF Special Details TYPICAL SERVICE CONNECTION Data: 04-01-15 FWGO FOR SANITARY SEWER HU -SS -4 Revised: \ EST. 1906 01-20-17 / I 1' TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER AND TYPE B SELF SEALING OVER TOP OF SEWER IS 14' OR LESS MINIMUM OF 10' COVER OVER TOP OF PIPE AT PICK HOLES. LID SHALL BE PROPERTY LINE I 5' \ RISER 4" OR 6" PVC SCH. 40 OR APPROVED POLYETHYLENE (PE) ** 45° BEND ADJUSTING RINGS ELEV TO BE SET 4" BY THE ENGINEER MIN 4.3 CONCRETE ENCASEMENT PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY ENTRENCHED (TYPICAL)AND SHALL HAVE CLASS "B" BEDDING INTENTIONALLY) WHERE DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER 6" - Z MIN TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER 1.5 OVER TOP OF SEWER IS 14' OR MORE 4" OR 6" NOTES: USE R-2 TYPE 1. ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS INCLUDING o�� NECESSARY BENDS AND SPECIAL FITTINGS SHALL FERNCO ADAPTOR OR CONCRETE BE PAID FOR AT THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE BID APPROVED EQUAL FOR ENCASEMENT PER LINEAR FOOT OF 4" OR 6". NO ADDITIONAL DISSIMILAR PIPES (TYPICAL) COMPENSATION SHALL BE ALLOWED FOR _ � CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OR PIPE BEDDING. 3.4 2. ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS SHALL TERMINATE AT VC WYE THE PROPERTY LINE OR AS SPECIFIED. Q 3. SERVICE STUB SHALL BE PLUGGED AND MARKED VAR. WITH A 4"x4" TIMBER PROTRUDING TOUT OF THE CONCRETE ENCASEMENT THRUST BLOCKING FOR GROUND AND PAINTED GREEN OR STEEL FENCE (TYPICAL) CLEANING EQUIPMENT POST. 21.3 4. CONSTRUCT 4" PVC SERVICES FOR RESIDENTIAL 21.3 AND 6" PVC SERVICES FOR COMMERCIAL LOTS. 6" PRECAST OR 5. WHERE SIDEWALK OR TRAILS ARE PLACED 1' FROM 18 RIGHT OF WAY, SANITARY SEWER SERVICES NO SCALE SHALL BE EXTENDED 10' BEYOND RIGHT OF WAY. �t CITY OF Special Details TYPICAL SERVICE CONNECTION Data: 04-01-15 FWGO FOR SANITARY SEWER HU -SS -4 Revised: \ EST. 1906 01-20-17 / I o' 90° BEND, PLUGGED CROSS AND TYPE B SELF SEALING GROUTING BETWEEN LID WITH 2 CONCEALED EXTERNAL PICK HOLES. LID SHALL BE CHIMNEY SEAL \ a J � 1.4 OR APPROVED POLYETHYLENE (PE) EQUIVALENT ADJUSTING RINGS - MIN 4" - MAX 12". 4'-0" w�F 4.3 CONE SECTION 1.6 (STEPS NOT SHOWN CEMENT. INTENTIONALLY) 3.8 48"-72" Z 5.4 2.9 1.5 1.0 10 VOIDS FILLED USE R-2 TYPE 11.8 o�� lEI6CB WITH CONCRETE CONFINED O-RING BRICK OR BLOCK 8.5 GASKET JOINTS GROUT _ � u>i� � C7 � u 3.4 w MANHOLE JOINTS I Q 23.0 VAR. � U� aQ T OF FLOW i 15.0 21.3 1/2 DIA. OF PIPE 21.3 11.6 6" PRECAST OR W 18 8" POURED BASE NO SCALE 38.0 27.0 14.6 7.6 3.8 ❑a 23.5 33.3 47.0 33.3 18.1 9.4 4.7 d �� 48.0 68.0 48.0 26.2 13.6 6.8 J � N u7 IZT ti J LU O J Q d W wz� CL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT � c� A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF c�J � u x Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 U_ vo aQ O w � m ❑ o_ w x � � O ED x� d J � O oZF �J_ I■I " � � O 2 Q v❑ • a w� ❑a � in � d zzw Q❑0- 0 �a 11 Ei • • .. Cc C 10,11 >_ IC C', t, cz� Tm � / Special Details CITY OF R I P R A P Date 03-01-10 DETAIL Revlaed WY -SD -6 \ EST. 1906 01-20-17 / 27 " DIA. o' 90° BEND, PLUGGED CROSS AND TYPE B SELF SEALING GROUTING BETWEEN LID WITH 2 CONCEALED EXTERNAL PICK HOLES. LID SHALL BE CHIMNEY SEAL LABELED "STORM SEWER" a J � 1.4 OR APPROVED POLYETHYLENE (PE) EQUIVALENT ADJUSTING RINGS - MIN 4" - MAX 12". 4'-0" w�F 4.3 CONE SECTION 1.6 (STEPS NOT SHOWN CEMENT. INTENTIONALLY) 3.8 48"-72" Z 5.4 2.9 1.5 1.0 10 VOIDS FILLED USE R-2 TYPE 11.8 o�� lEI6CB WITH CONCRETE CONFINED O-RING BRICK OR BLOCK 8.5 GASKET JOINTS GROUT _ � u>i� � C7 � u 3.4 w MANHOLE JOINTS I Q 23.0 VAR. � U� aQ T OF FLOW i 15.0 21.3 1/2 DIA. OF PIPE 21.3 11.6 6" PRECAST OR W 18 8" POURED BASE NO SCALE 38.0 27.0 14.6 7.6 3.8 ❑a 23.5 33.3 47.0 33.3 18.1 9.4 4.7 d �� 48.0 68.0 48.0 26.2 13.6 6.8 J � N u7 IZT ti J LU O J Q d W wz� CL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT � c� A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF c�J � u x Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 U_ vo aQ O w � m ❑ o_ w x � � O ED x� d J � O oZF �J_ " � O 2 Q v❑ a w� ❑a � in � d zzw Q❑0- 0 �a / Special Details CITY OF R I P R A P Date 03-01-10 DETAIL Revlaed WY -SD -6 \ EST. 1906 01-20-17 / 27 " DIA. o' 90° BEND, PLUGGED CROSS AND TYPE B SELF SEALING GROUTING BETWEEN LID WITH 2 CONCEALED EXTERNAL PICK HOLES. LID SHALL BE CHIMNEY SEAL LABELED "STORM SEWER" a J � 1.4 OR APPROVED POLYETHYLENE (PE) EQUIVALENT ADJUSTING RINGS - MIN 4" - MAX 12". 4'-0" w�F 4.3 CONE SECTION 1.6 (STEPS NOT SHOWN CEMENT. INTENTIONALLY) 3.8 48"-72" Z 5.4 2.9 1.5 1.0 10 VOIDS FILLED USE R-2 TYPE 11.8 o�� 4.6 WITH CONCRETE CONFINED O-RING BRICK OR BLOCK 8.5 GASKET JOINTS GROUT _ � u>i� � C7 � u 3.4 w MANHOLE JOINTS I Q 23.0 VAR. � U� aQ T OF FLOW i 15.0 21.3 1/2 DIA. OF PIPE 21.3 11.6 6" PRECAST OR W 18 8" POURED BASE NO SCALE 38.0 27.0 14.6 7.6 3.8 ❑a 23.5 33.3 47.0 33.3 18.1 9.4 4.7 d �� 48.0 68.0 48.0 26.2 13.6 6.8 J � N u7 IZT ti J LU O J Q d W wz� CL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT � c� A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF c�J � u x Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 U_ vo aQ O w � m ❑ o_ w x � � O ED x� d J � O oZF �J_ " � O 2 Q v❑ a w� ❑a � in � d zzw Q❑0- 0 �a / Special Details CITY OF R I P R A P Date 03-01-10 DETAIL Revlaed WY -SD -6 \ EST. 1906 01-20-17 / 27 " DIA. NEENAH R-1642 FRAME 90° BEND, PLUGGED CROSS AND TYPE B SELF SEALING GROUTING BETWEEN LID WITH 2 CONCEALED EXTERNAL PICK HOLES. LID SHALL BE CHIMNEY SEAL LABELED "STORM SEWER" INFI-SHEILD 1.4 OR APPROVED POLYETHYLENE (PE) EQUIVALENT ADJUSTING RINGS - MIN 4" - MAX 12". 4'-0" STANDARD OFFSET 4.3 CONE SECTION 1.6 (STEPS NOT SHOWN CEMENT. INTENTIONALLY) ECCENTRIC REDUCERS TO BE } USED FOR 60" V-4" & 72" BARRELS + - 48"-72" GROUT 16" LU LU Of 8" > 8" DIRECTION OF FLOW NOTES: 1. MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST ALUMINUM OR MA INDUSTRY WITH VINYL COATING OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT AND SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE DOWN STREAM SIDE OF THE MANHOLE 2. STEPS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT THE OFFSET VERTICAL PORTION OF THE CONE IS FACING DOWN STREAM 3. MANHOLE COVER SHALL BE CAST WITH THE WORDS "STORM SEWER" 4. THE INITIAL AND FINAL RAISING OF CASTINGS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT / �, CITY OF Special Details STANDARD MANHOLE FOR Date FWGO 04-01-15 STORM DRAIN HU -STM -1 Revised: \ F,S'P. 1906 01-20-17 / 16" GA. GALVANIZED STEEL STRAP (1) 1" EYE BOLT WITH (2) WASHERS EACH PLAN i'11'7 ELEVATION NOTES: 1. ENTIRE TRASH GUARD ASSEMBLY TO BE HOT-DIP=GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION. 2. SIZE OF TRASH GUARD VARIABLE DEPENDENT ON SIZE OF FLARED END SECTION. 3. TRASH GUARDS TO BE INSTALLED ON APRONS ONLY AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. CITY OF ESi TRASH GUARD FOR STORM SEWER APRONS TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL BARS - 5/8" FOR 24" APRON & SMALLER, 3/4" FOR 27" APRON & LARGER WELD EACH INTERSECTION 6" MIN. 12" MAX. (LESS THAN 6", USE 1 BAR CENTERED ON OPENING Special Details Date: 04-01-15 Revised: H U -STM - 7 01-20-17 A CENTER STRUCTURE TO BACK OF CURB CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH NO. R -3067V WITH VANE GRATE. INSTALL GATOR WRAP EXTERNAL MANHOLE CHIMNEY SEAL OR APPROVED EQUAL. EXTERNAL SEAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURE'S RECOMMENDATIONS. SHIMMING OF ADJUST RINGS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 5"' VOIDS FILLED WITH CONCRETE BRICK OR BLOCK ONLY TEE, WYE, PLUG OR CAP 90° BEND, PLUGGED CROSS TEE PLUGGED ON RUN GROUTING BETWEEN 22-1/2° BEND 11-1/4° BEND Al A2 PIPE AND MANHOLE 1.0 1.4 1.9 1.4 BARREL SHALL BE LU - 4'-0" 2.1 WITH NON- SHRINKING 4.3 3.0 1.6 1.0 CEMENT. 8 3.8 48"-72" 7.6 5.4 2.9 1.5 1.0 10 VOIDS FILLED USE R-2 TYPE 11.8 8.4 4.6 WITH CONCRETE CONFINED O-RING BRICK OR BLOCK 8.5 GASKET JOINTS GROUT ONLY. FOR ALL 3.4 w MANHOLE JOINTS I Q 23.0 VAR. > DIRECTION ,. 4.6 T OF FLOW i 15.0 21.3 1/2 DIA. OF PIPE 21.3 11.6 6" PRECAST OR 3.0 18 8" POURED BASE NO SCALE 38.0 27.0 - 48"-72" GROUT 16" LU LU Of 8" > 8" DIRECTION OF FLOW NOTES: 1. MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST ALUMINUM OR MA INDUSTRY WITH VINYL COATING OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT AND SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE DOWN STREAM SIDE OF THE MANHOLE 2. STEPS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT THE OFFSET VERTICAL PORTION OF THE CONE IS FACING DOWN STREAM 3. MANHOLE COVER SHALL BE CAST WITH THE WORDS "STORM SEWER" 4. THE INITIAL AND FINAL RAISING OF CASTINGS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT / �, CITY OF Special Details STANDARD MANHOLE FOR Date FWGO 04-01-15 STORM DRAIN HU -STM -1 Revised: \ F,S'P. 1906 01-20-17 / 16" GA. GALVANIZED STEEL STRAP (1) 1" EYE BOLT WITH (2) WASHERS EACH PLAN i'11'7 ELEVATION NOTES: 1. ENTIRE TRASH GUARD ASSEMBLY TO BE HOT-DIP=GALVANIZED AFTER FABRICATION. 2. SIZE OF TRASH GUARD VARIABLE DEPENDENT ON SIZE OF FLARED END SECTION. 3. TRASH GUARDS TO BE INSTALLED ON APRONS ONLY AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. CITY OF ESi TRASH GUARD FOR STORM SEWER APRONS TRANSVERSE & LONGITUDINAL BARS - 5/8" FOR 24" APRON & SMALLER, 3/4" FOR 27" APRON & LARGER WELD EACH INTERSECTION 6" MIN. 12" MAX. (LESS THAN 6", USE 1 BAR CENTERED ON OPENING Special Details Date: 04-01-15 Revised: H U -STM - 7 01-20-17 A CENTER STRUCTURE TO BACK OF CURB CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH NO. R -3067V WITH VANE GRATE. INSTALL GATOR WRAP EXTERNAL MANHOLE CHIMNEY SEAL OR APPROVED EQUAL. EXTERNAL SEAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURE'S RECOMMENDATIONS. SHIMMING OF ADJUST RINGS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 5"' VOIDS FILLED WITH CONCRETE BRICK OR BLOCK ONLY PLAN 12" FLOW LINE SHALL BE MIN. 0.7' BELOW TOP OF CURB �6" ',. POLYEHTYLENE (PE) ADJUSTING RINGS - 24" MIN" - MAX 12" U)------------- 6" PRECAST OR 8" POURED BASE SECTION A -A NOTES: 1. REINFORCING TO CONSIST OF #4 BARS @ 8" O.C. BOTH WAYS 2. GROUT BOTTOM TO DRAIN TO CENTER 3. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED 11. WIMCO OR APPROVED EQUAL INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MAINTAINEDAND KEPT IN GOOD SHAPE UNTIL WEAR COURSE IS PAVED °i. DRAIN TILE TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS NO SCALE Special Details CITY OF STANDARD CATCH BASIN Date AUGO 04-01-15 WITHOUT SUMP HU -STM -3A Revised: 01-20-17 VALVE BOX SETT'"' T r 114"-3/8" BELOW PAVE AT GRADE IN TL VALVE BOX SHALL BE SET T HAVE 6" ADJUSTMENT UP AN DOWN FROM FINISH GRAE AGGREGATE AND MnDOT 3733 TYPE 3 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC LINING DRAIN PIT AND ATTACHED TO TOP OF VALVE BOX FOOT PIECE 1-1/2" WASHED ROCK ALL AROUND MIN 1/3 C.Y. (MIN. 1 C.Y. IN IMPERVIOUS SOILS) D.I.P. WATERMAIN GATE VALVE ADAPTOR: 1/4" STEEL WITH PROTECTIVE COATING 3/4" RUBBER GASKET INSTALLED BETWEEN GATE VALVE AND ADAPTOR SIDE VIEW . �SVIEW . �S BONNET ADAPTOR NOTES: 1. GATE VALVES SHOULD BE USED ON 6" THROUGH 16" WATERMAIN. 2. VALVE BOX INSERTS ARE NOT ALLOWED UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED PLUMB AND SHALL ALLOW A 4" P.V.C. PIPE TO PASS ENTIRELY OVER THE GATE VALVE NUT AFTER INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE. 4. ALL VALVES SHALL BE TIED WITH 3/4" THREADED TIE RODS TO THE MAIN. MEGA LUGS MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF TIE RODS. 5. THE INITIAL & FINAL RAISING OF VALVE BOXES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT. NO SCALE �- CITY OF Special Details VALVE B 0 X Date 04-01-15 INSTALLATION HU -W-3 Revised: \ FST. 1906 01-20-17 / NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS TYPICAL FOR ALL FLARED END SECTIONS. (TYP) (3) 1-1/4" HOLES 2' 0" USE (3) 1" BOLTS AND TIE TO SHEET (TYP) PILING -G #4 AT 16" O.C. STAGGERED 2" 300 PSI DNCRETE (TYP) -=S USE (3) 1" BOLTS AND TIE TO PLAN SHEET PILING SHEET PILING (GALVANIZED INTERLOCK) 10 GAUGE MINIMUM 3000 PSI CONCRETE #4 EACH FACE #4 EACH FACE OUTSIDE WIDTH OF END 8 0 SECTION PLUS 4' 0" (TYP) ELEVATION CITY OF Special Details PILING FOR STORM SEWER Date 1UG0 04-01-15 APRONS (36" DIA. 8c LARGER) HU -STM -5 Revised: �- 1xsr.1906 01-20-17 EACH AREA IS 1/2 OF TABULATED TOTAL AREA BEND \%\y/; i�%/`%/`%/`�j 1/4" PLYWOOD \/\\ OVER FACE +' \j OF BOLTS PLUG OR CAP PLUGGED CROSS WYE \\ \ Al .. A2 PLUGGED CROSS PLUGGED TEE NOMINAL FITTING SIZE, INCHES TEE, WYE, PLUG OR CAP 90° BEND, PLUGGED CROSS TEE PLUGGED ON RUN 45° BEND 22-1/2° BEND 11-1/4° BEND Al A2 4 1.0 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.0 LU - 6 2.1 3.0 4.3 3.0 1.6 1.0 - 8 3.8 5.3 7.6 5.4 2.9 1.5 1.0 10 5.9 8.4 11.8 8.4 4.6 2.6 1.2 12 8.5 12.0 17.0 C 6.6 3.4 1.7 14 11.5 16.3 23.0 16.3 8.9 4.6 2.3 PLAN 12" FLOW LINE SHALL BE MIN. 0.7' BELOW TOP OF CURB �6" ',. POLYEHTYLENE (PE) ADJUSTING RINGS - 24" MIN" - MAX 12" U)------------- 6" PRECAST OR 8" POURED BASE SECTION A -A NOTES: 1. REINFORCING TO CONSIST OF #4 BARS @ 8" O.C. BOTH WAYS 2. GROUT BOTTOM TO DRAIN TO CENTER 3. PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED 11. WIMCO OR APPROVED EQUAL INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MAINTAINEDAND KEPT IN GOOD SHAPE UNTIL WEAR COURSE IS PAVED °i. DRAIN TILE TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS NO SCALE Special Details CITY OF STANDARD CATCH BASIN Date AUGO 04-01-15 WITHOUT SUMP HU -STM -3A Revised: 01-20-17 VALVE BOX SETT'"' T r 114"-3/8" BELOW PAVE AT GRADE IN TL VALVE BOX SHALL BE SET T HAVE 6" ADJUSTMENT UP AN DOWN FROM FINISH GRAE AGGREGATE AND MnDOT 3733 TYPE 3 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC LINING DRAIN PIT AND ATTACHED TO TOP OF VALVE BOX FOOT PIECE 1-1/2" WASHED ROCK ALL AROUND MIN 1/3 C.Y. (MIN. 1 C.Y. IN IMPERVIOUS SOILS) D.I.P. WATERMAIN GATE VALVE ADAPTOR: 1/4" STEEL WITH PROTECTIVE COATING 3/4" RUBBER GASKET INSTALLED BETWEEN GATE VALVE AND ADAPTOR SIDE VIEW . �SVIEW . �S BONNET ADAPTOR NOTES: 1. GATE VALVES SHOULD BE USED ON 6" THROUGH 16" WATERMAIN. 2. VALVE BOX INSERTS ARE NOT ALLOWED UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED PLUMB AND SHALL ALLOW A 4" P.V.C. PIPE TO PASS ENTIRELY OVER THE GATE VALVE NUT AFTER INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE. 4. ALL VALVES SHALL BE TIED WITH 3/4" THREADED TIE RODS TO THE MAIN. MEGA LUGS MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF TIE RODS. 5. THE INITIAL & FINAL RAISING OF VALVE BOXES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT. NO SCALE �- CITY OF Special Details VALVE B 0 X Date 04-01-15 INSTALLATION HU -W-3 Revised: \ FST. 1906 01-20-17 / NOTE: THIS DRAWING IS TYPICAL FOR ALL FLARED END SECTIONS. (TYP) (3) 1-1/4" HOLES 2' 0" USE (3) 1" BOLTS AND TIE TO SHEET (TYP) PILING -G #4 AT 16" O.C. STAGGERED 2" 300 PSI DNCRETE (TYP) -=S USE (3) 1" BOLTS AND TIE TO PLAN SHEET PILING SHEET PILING (GALVANIZED INTERLOCK) 10 GAUGE MINIMUM 3000 PSI CONCRETE #4 EACH FACE #4 EACH FACE OUTSIDE WIDTH OF END 8 0 SECTION PLUS 4' 0" (TYP) ELEVATION CITY OF Special Details PILING FOR STORM SEWER Date 1UG0 04-01-15 APRONS (36" DIA. 8c LARGER) HU -STM -5 Revised: �- 1xsr.1906 01-20-17 EACH AREA IS 1/2 OF TABULATED TOTAL AREA BEND \%\y/; i�%/`%/`%/`�j 1/4" PLYWOOD \/\\ OVER FACE +' \j OF BOLTS PLUG OR CAP PLUGGED CROSS WYE \\ \ Al .. A2 PLUGGED CROSS PLUGGED TEE NOMINAL FITTING SIZE, INCHES TEE, WYE, PLUG OR CAP 90° BEND, PLUGGED CROSS TEE PLUGGED ON RUN 45° BEND 22-1/2° BEND 11-1/4° BEND Al A2 4 1.0 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.0 LU - 6 2.1 3.0 4.3 3.0 1.6 1.0 - 8 3.8 5.3 7.6 5.4 2.9 1.5 1.0 10 5.9 8.4 11.8 8.4 4.6 2.6 1.2 12 8.5 12.0 17.0 12.0 6.6 3.4 1.7 14 11.5 16.3 23.0 16.3 8.9 4.6 2.3 16 15.0 21.3 30.0 21.3 11.6 6.0 3.0 18 19.0 27,0 38.0 27.0 14.6 7.6 3.8 20 23.5 33.3 47.0 33.3 18.1 9.4 4.7 24 34.0 48.0 68.0 48.0 26.2 13.6 6.8 NOTES: 1. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING TO BE POURED AGAINST UNDISTURBED EARTH. 2. KEEP CONCRETE CLEAR OF JOINT AND ACCESSORIES. 3. REQUIRED BEARING AREAS AT FITTING SHALL BE AS NOTED ABOVE, UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE. 4. BEARING AREAS AND SPECIAL BLOCKING DETAILS SHOWN ON THE PLANS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER BEARING AREAS AND BLOCKING DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS STANDARD PLATE. 5. ABOVE BEARING AREAS BASED ON TEST PRESSURES OF 150 PSI AND AN ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING STRESS OF 2000 LBS. PER SQUARE FOOT. TO COMPUTE BEARING AREAS FOR DIFFERENT TEST PRESSURES AND SOIL BEARING STRESSES, USE THE FOLLOWING EQUATION: BEARING AREA = (TEST PRESSURE/150) X (2000/SOIL BEARING STRESS) X (TABLE VALUE). CITY of Special Details POURED CONCRETE THRUST Date 04-01-15 BLOCKING FOR WATERMAIN HU-W-� Revised: _-� 01-20-17 / (C070 00�e C� G3 O M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-515-0060 MILLER HANSON Cn z LU M N IZT� Lf') H M LO co z z z W CQ Q H 0 a 0 W Wz a z 0� Q Cn W\ Q LU W J W U � Q z 2 J Uj u7 IZT ti �0U LU O CL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL DETAILS 2/14/2019 4:59 PM ©COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. A WW . . SIDE SLOPE TREATMENTS, SEE GRADING OR LANDSCAPE PLANS O O O �5. E,I.,.G- �- Irk 1/2"R. •�"`C \ / Y 0t�� \\ ` '' WALK 1. RIBBON CURB OR CURB CUT, SEE SEE GRADING PLAN FOR DEPTH � H R F////, F Y^ 2X �Y'''r' ..:`^-. 4 I ' S. WALKABLE INSET A EXISTING SITE AND GRADING PLANS PLANT MATERIAL, SEE LANDSCAPE PLAN S STRdiGHT FOAMS O9 * "' VARIABLE \ _ O p MAY BE USED Oj � MRM. - _„ � „C]C4{7 H ICOR[ � � $[[WALK O O aft 3.. WALK F L y • < 6.1 v CURB INTLRSECTION � ATO T GRASS PRE-TREATMENT STRIP OR NON -WOVEN GEOTEXTILE (MnDOT 3733, TYPE Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture R,RE FLARE 4 `' 8% 10X FLARE ._ I- r PEDESTRIAN PATH I PRE-TREATMENT STRUCTURE, SEE BACK DF CU RW f-�',.y„% - 2 -- - 'OF TRAVEL LANDING RAMP) cT 6 1 - HIGH FLOW RATE AROUND GRAVEL 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 FLOx LINE ~ °�� O "'_1EA15TM O I UTILITY AND LANDSCAPE PLANS BLANKET - EXTENDING 1.5' FROM St. Louis Park, MN 55416 O' D„ D- O' V CURB ADJACLNI IU LANDSCAPE 1 FRONT OF CUTTER © NON-WALKARL[ - BUILDING A 6 F OR WALKABLE 2z OIAGONAL CLIRR WIT NIN SIDFWAI K I NITS Ex15r1H0, S RAMP LEI' NGTH-� I -� I__-_-_-_- UNDERDRAIN PIPE SIDES D• w,Lx 3 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 PERPENDICULAR MAH. $"ALL °NL1 BE USED AFTER ALL - UNDERDRAIN GRAVEL BLANKET 1-1.5" FAN® P OTHER CURB RAMP TYPES HAVE BEEN -':•�;;' 1„ A EVALUAIED AND DEEMED IMPRAC71CAL I - ` � `"'�'^xF;,yRIE-T VARIABLE. A 3X:1 L MA . OO NOTES: DX-'°% "ARE--'E%15T�NG - -- DOUBLE WASHED STONE (NON LIMESTONE WALK-.-.--�^- 1!T"n,LAn01HGS SHALL BE 4OCATm ANTWHERC THE PEOGSTRIpN ACCESS RGNTE )PARI EHgNGES_ _ -� F OR CONCRETE MATERIAL). O�, DIRECTION, ATTILETOP OF RAMPS THAT NAVE RUIxIWG SLOP{5 GREATER T"AN S.O A, \ yyry�, r l"R• 6"© 3" I AND IF THE APPROACHING BALK IS INVERSE GRADE GREATER THAN 2%. - M•�'�ry �,d VARIABLE JIJ [krT1Al [IRR RAa1P I AMT)ING% SHAI I RF rf %1AHntrn WITHIN SA"rAOM 1"r RACK1. / HEIGHT `%. '] Of CURB, WITH 6- ROM THE BACK OF CURB BEING THE PREFERRED DIST ANCE, ONLY •, R C I NON -WALKABLE OR S NON -WALKABLE OR APPL]CABLE MEN THE LkLT1AL RAMP RUNNING SLOPE IS OVER 5.9%. t `p V CURET ADJACENT TQ RU[LQING •� WALKABLE SURFp[E I�Q WALKABLE SURFACE - 6"m w ��� W CqJ 5LCOFAARY CURB RAMP LANUING5 ARE REQUIRED FOR EVENT 3°" °F VERTICAL M15L L OR BARRIER r - Y • ` - ` - - ^ - - - - _ FLARE FLARE WHEN THE LONCITUDInAI RVnxIxC SLOPE rS OfEATER THAN S.OY„ '* \� .' 2 I -I I I -I I I -I I I -I I I. _ CONTRACTION JOINTS SMALL fE [IXSTRIA; TED ALONG ALL GRADE BREAMS WITHIN THE PAR. li4" SEEP © VT UAL J01NT5 SHILL BE USED dT THE TOPS OF CONCRETE FLARES E ATH TO WALKdBLE SURFdCES °`� °• -1 I 1 I T-_ -I I I -I I I I I -_-I I I I I Q Q 0" O" © © CONCRETE CURB DESIGN Y MI I I. I- I I II _ p u.L GRAOF BREAKS WITHIN THF. PAR SHALL BF PFRPF.NO I[l1LAP TO THE PATH OF TRAVELUSBOTH V [DRB ADJACENT TO LANDSCAPE I ISH ,-sz I SIDES OF A SLOPED WALKING SURFACE MUST BE EQUAL LENGTH. fEKCEP7 AS STATED IN BELOW. O AR. _ I _ A T 4 CURB OUTSIDE SIDEWALK LIMITS CURB HEIGHT CURB IIDTN TIERED PERPENDICULAR I properties TO ENSURE INITIAL RAMPS AND INITIALU0S LANDING$ ARE PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED. ON SHEET i I - I_ 111 SHALL BE U57 SEPARATELY,FOLLON SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DETAILS ON SHEET 6 AND N W SEMI -DIRECTIONAL RAMP 73,4,91 1 -I I I -I I- I I I -I I I -I I I -I T A P • PR - PR T F WORK I Af iii ME DA 5 ECl L PROVISIONS OSECU ]ON 0 0 AD - �R„ 4., 3'DOME SETBACK, 4'LONG RAMP AND - _ G 7 MODIFIED FAN 0 TOP OF CURB SHALL MATCH PROPOSED ADJACENT WALK GRADE. PUSH BUTTON S' FROM THE BACK OF CURB 'I - z6" 6" UNDISTURBED UNCOMPACTED I I -I I I- I -I I I -I I I -I I I- USED WHEN RICHT-OF-NAY WHEN TIE BOULEVARD IS A•WIDE oR LESS. TRE TOP CVA6 TAP SNAIL MATCH INC Roup PRIMAR ICY USED FOR APS APPLICATIONS ' -I ..! . `:' - ° IS CONSTRAINED SLOPES r0 REDUCE LEGATIVE BOULEVARD SLOPES FRON THE TOP BACK OF CURB TO THE PAR. WIHFRE THE PAR DOES NOT CONTINUE PAST I G•O - ," ;24. -I s 70'MF THE PUSH BUTTON (DEAD-END SIDEWALK) - - - - - IVARJ- - - - - - INSITU SOIL I I -I ----/!�EY� -/^� ALL RAMP TYPES SHOULD NAVE A MINIMAL 3' LONG RAMP LENGTH_V//AST- __Q 4' MINIUILU •[DTH BF DETECTAULL WARN % IS RLWIRLD FOR ALL KAMP5. DETECTABLE WARNIMCs INSET ASHALL CONTINUOUSLY EXTEND FAVIM. OF 24" IN THE PATH OF TRA'JEL.GETECTABLE 4'MIN. aM,N• - NARNFNO TO LOVER ENTIRE WIDTH OF SHARED -USE PATHS AND THE ENTIRE PAR WIDTH OF LANCING ,TRANSITION PANEL 0� I I -,'''', -- V,EjL•DING NET LESS EROSION BLANKET IN BOTTOM OF -IIIIII- - _ =I I I=I11-11 I -I THE WALK. DELECTABLE wARNLNG SHOULD BE 6' LESS THAN THE PAR/TRAIL WIDTH, ARC nlSrakCF FRnu APS WPI IJ&ELK DISTANCE FROM APS PUSH NOTES: LtNwln a RADIAL utltcl ABEL wannlNUS 5NA7uty NUI tl1 GlaaTtn Tnpn 3u rtt T. B BUTTON TO EDGED $IO, 5 BUTTON TO EDGE OF $IDEWAtK Oj 1 I O" O" © 6" WIDE ENLIST NOT EXCEED EEO !O FNCHES E' 110E 1 mi ExUEU IU INA,ES . JA ENT T FLARE K IN A-IR'L CONCRETE FLARE THATPED[ 15 AN PATH "NEN THE FLARE 15 BASIN. SLIT BLANKET TO ALLOW PLANT-Ij�Ij�IL�-I . C I (] RECTANGULAR OE7ECTABIE WARNING$ SHALL BE SETBACK 3" FROM TME BACK OF CURB. RADIAL Y -CURB I Y-CITffi A ADJACENT TO A WALKABLE SURFACE. OR WHEN THE PEDESTRIAN PATH OF TRAVEL OFA -I I I -I I I I I -I I I -I I I -_-I I I- -I 11- I L L E P - 4 LIEILC1AtlLt wAHEIGHT CUR& tlE SLItlALK J' MINIMUM iU b" MRN1M'JM Frrt1M THE WALK VF CUHtl, P115H BUTTON TRAVERSES THE FLAgE. PERFORATED UNDERDRAIN OUTLET PIPE PARALLEL PATCH FULL HEIGHT CURB' ALL NRB BUTTON, TRAVERSES DN JOINTS SHALL MATCH CONCRETE WALK JOINTS. MATERIAL SURFACE IF PLUG PLANTING IS TO I O OI, O,'IBN]WAA DEPTH LANDING REQUIRED ACROSS TOP OF RAMP. �__ Ea? 6. „I, 6' NIDE WHERE R1GNT-OF-wAY ALLOWS, USE OF V CURB SHOULD BC NINIMI2EO.GRAII]NG ADJACENT BE USED I -I I I III -III -III -I III -I1 3" 3 3^ MICH CURB REN US1NC R 3'LONC RAMP,," HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 9'LONC RAMP. Y -CURB Y -CURB TURF OR SLOPING ADJACENT PAVEMENT IS PREFERRED. SEE GRADING AND LANDSCAPE 1 =I = _ = I I- 6" DIAMETER RIGID, PERFORRATED PVC. YAR. 4'0"YIN• O4 SEE SCE7 A aF 6. TYPICAL SIDE TREATMENT OPTIONS.rDR DETAILS ON FLARES , STAIJON°TPOLE I ,B^ wIGE RY IB• LDNc, V CURB SHALL BE PLACED OUT5I0E THE SIOEwALK LIMITS WHEN RIGHT OF WAY ALLOWS. PLANS I I I- I I SEE UTILITY PLAN CURB OR A REWIRED LANDING f+ CURB AND GVTT/7///7ANO RETURNED ClTtBS, RHEN INITIAL LANDING IS AT FLLL CURB HEIGHT. A YIN. 12' TMICN CONCRETE, V CUPS NEXT r0 BUILDING SHALL BE A 4•' WITH ANO SHALL MATCH PREVIOUS TCP ' I 1- 1 I ' ER -L1 l/4^ R. _ _ _ O (5) DETECTABLE WARNINGS MAY" BE PART OF THE ,' % ,' YIN. LANDING AREA SF ]7 I5 NOT 3°" % 30" SOIIARE MODIFY THE PUSH BUTTON OF SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS. I I I -I y - - - ` T FEASIBLE 70 SOH$,RUCT THE LINp[MG OUTSIDE OF T}If DETECTABLE WARNIND IREd, 9'' PEDESTAL POLE B PEDESTAL FW,gATIOH PLAN vtEW SIR IBM YO ALLOW A `,�y4": .,.9_- + �' 9 ILINE IIP CENTER DF POLE HMR,ST RE FLOW WITH SOUARE TRUNCATION. © THE GRADE BREAK SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE BACK OF WALK. THIS WILL EN5URE WITH THL BACK OF V-CJRP) THE SURROUNDING WALK) G) LNU CAPERS Al IRANSJI JUN SLCIIUN )HALL MATLH INPLACi SIUEWRLK GRAGE3. HANSON - ,�_ • 0.02 FT./FT-YAH. 5 THAT THE GRADE OfSAx 15 PEPP[NDICIAAR TO THE DIRECTION DF TRAVEL. (TYPICAL FOR 0.LLi PLAN VIEW 2 ALL V CURB SHALL MATCH B07TOM OF ADJACENT WALK. INSTALL 40 -MIL IMPERMEABLE LINER OR CLAY LINER P ,O.OB FT./FT.ALD Or WHEN ADJACENT 70 CRASS, GRADIN[ SHALL ALWAYS BE USED WHEN FEASIBLE, CURB. O MIN. PLANTING MEDIUM DEPTH 24"} IF USED. SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE INE SIOEWALX LIMITS WHEN RIGHT OF WAY ALLOWS. [3) EDGE BETNEEN NEw Y CURB AND IMF -LACE STRUCTURE SHALL BE SEALED AND CONCRETE 50.003 rT./rl PREFERRED WHEN ADJACENT 10 PARKING LOTS.COMCRETE OR BITUMINOUS TAPERS SHOULD BE USED AP5 PUSH BUTTON BOND BRFAKER S"ALL Bt JSEE) HETWELN GXISTING STRJCTJRL AMU PLAELD Y -CURB, WITH A WELL BLENDED MIXTURE (BY VOLUME): PER RECOMMENDATIONS FROM GEOTECH ENGINEER o r C h I t e c L S W' OYER Y CUA 10 REDUCE TRIWING HAZRH05 AND FACILITATE 5NON N ICE REMOVAL (SADDLE SPACERS )SADDLE ADAPTORS) OTHEPER HAM. RATE OF CROSS SLOPE TRANSITIONING IS )'LINEAR FOOT OF 'OR THE D BELOW POND DUE TO MINIMAL SEPARATION FROM SECTION A -A B A T'M[N TDP RADIUS GRADE BREAM REWIRED TO UL {MMSTRUCTIBLE. PER HALF PERCENT CROSS SLOPE. WHEN PAR INK l5 CREATE„ THAN 17 OR THE 70 /o HOMOGENOUS CONSTRUCTION SAND PFRPFND r[II AR/TIFRFR/117ArA1NAI - y RAYL FULL "ALK MUNI APS PUSH BUTTON BLINDING SI-OPC IS CHEATER THAN 5X, DOUBLE THE CALCULATE° iRdN51710N LENGTH. 'T $" SLOPES ON FANS SHALL ONLY BE USED WHEN ALL OTHER FEASIBLE OPTIONS HAVE BEEN ocean%F nf%PToR[, OiRE lTTllp"NE Fll"LL[llRBLHEIGN7'�fTYPIrdLESELT[ON1.TC RANP,Oft IF NEEDEO,LANOrNc ° GROUNDWATER CURD OR © eYALDA]ED AND DEEMED IMPRACTICAL, 30 �o ORGANIC COMPOST CURB AMD GOITER YAR, A'o"MIN. y (DARE CROSS SLOPE GREATER THAN 2.0%. ITzdi off LANUJNC I LECEND r/4' R, IR•� WIDE CONCRETE t0 LEGEND TIE LONG rU0 N 5 OPE RANGES SHALL B THE STARTING POINT. IF T - - - - - �$�� 5C i T AL L C 5I E 6" WIDE MATCH HEIGHT OF CONDITIONS ]ONS NAIRRANT. LONGllllp[F1dL SLOPES lA TO 0.3% OP FLATTER ARE ALLOWED. V - CURB ADJAEENT 6" WIDE Y{IRB TN(SL I ONf.IYI RINAI SI MT RANfJ'S SNAIL RF INF iTARTING POINT. IF Slif _' •-. : - - ' ° • ° CONDITIGNS WARRANT, LONGITUDINAL SLOPES IIP TO B.3Y. OR FLATTER ARE ALLOWED. TYPICAL SECTION VIEW • 0.02 F7./FT. MAX. • UDSCATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP (LOPE $HALL BE BEIWEEN + t T 5,0% MINIMUM AND &3Y. MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN �S INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL BE BETWEEN 6• T AND THE CROSS SLOPE SHALL „OT EXCEED 1M.., f 5.0% MINIMUM AND LYX MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN CdKRETE ?0.02 FT /FT. ALD V TOP VF WALK AND THE CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT CxCEED 2.a%" WALK 50.05 fT./Ff PREFERRED {T] INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP -SLOPE SHALL BE GREATER q• A' { AND ORO$$ SLOP THAN 2.CTA AND SHALL SHALL NOIRAN T°X IN ExCEED"L2.0X`RLCT[ON SHOWN I5„ ® 2.0 1NG SLOPELIN ALL DIRECTIO'N$. LANDING SHALL BE WIDTH OFD MAX INCOMING PARS. SECTION B -B 4'D MIN, o JN- CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING FAN REDVLREO LANDING 2o% SG AREA -,'% A'MIH.IS'M 5- MIN. PREFERREW OIMENSIDNS AND MAX © LAMP TO W1 PANESTIN 10 LK USED FOR IHANS111 OF THE ION SHOULD OF A , 1/4• R. ® 2.OX ROPE IN ALL D]RECT[ONS. LANDING SHALL BE FULL WrUTII OF INCOMING PARS, RAMP TO THC EXISTING WALT[ CROSS SLOPE. ROTC OF TRANSITION SHOULD >3C 0.5% - - i - - - -- - - DEPRESSED CORNER X- CURB HEIGHT SECTION B -B SECTION A -A PER 1 LINEAR FOOT OF WALK. SEE THIS SWEET FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION_ ' • ' •' ° ,. • - ° +,�Wn,T� "E�� SIGNAL PEDESTAL & PUSH BUTTON fV-CURB) PUSH BUTTON STATION IV -CURB) .AWW„Wd� REa REVISIMA COMB OR 5" PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS RFVISICNe s PEDIS IRIAN CURB RAMP LLTAILs 1. INSTALL SILT FENCE AND/OR OR OTHER APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY 9. IMPLEMENT TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL ECRB 'NO WIIEH CONCRETE B.BZ FT./TT.MAx. //1 ,,/.,' EROSION CONTROL DEVICES TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM LEAVING OR PRACTICES. APPR YEDs JANUARY 23.2017 WALK . /I p(I,q - .... APPR VEDs JANUARY 23° P017 a - .ApgpyCO, 3 iii } vIR _, secTloN c -C '1A 0 n F n n � � � ,, -W 1-23-2017 STANDARD PL f�N 5-29?.250 5 OF 6 ENTERING THE PRACTICE DURING CONSTRUCTION. 10. PLANT AND/OR ROCK MULCH BIORETENTION DEVICE. ___ -- Wu.,ae ocNiar YAHALLtL/UEPHLSStU CUHNtK ♦rNTW` sIAT[G[sIRN [x61NIu 1-23-2017 5�r5NLJ!\RD PL/1N 5-L97.250 1 �r 6 '-may-'r.'--- *�+ ` SIAIC DCSILN CHG]NEER 2. ALL DOWN -GRADIENT PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S MUST BE IN 11. REMOVE TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL DEVICES AFTER THE PLACE BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY BEGINS. CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS ADEQUATELY VEGETATED. Cn __ PLACE DETECTABLE 3. PERFORM CONTINUOUS INSPECTIONS OF EROSION CONTROL \ -_x FAfF OF fJ DER/P3EO.IFf TEO WARNINGS ENTIRE INSET 0. BK�7 A INSET A \ _ TACE OF CURB WALK/PATH wlvrN FRONT OF GUTTER LANDIrM,: BqC MATCH INPLRCE , q, 7 FRONT OF ODT,LR FROM, OF Ol1TTER _ PRACTICES. _- C C)0 BACK OF CURB/ Bl[A Or CLRR/ BALK OF CIRR/ or CURB HErGHT MAILK JNPLALL H aESECTABLE 1/9 FLOW LINE EDGE OF WALK qQ OT FLOW LBIE EDGE OF WALK 00 FLOW. LINE EDGE OF WALK WALKAFI ,QUEM[XEE1k1 RAup WF�I ARF[ \= - -- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _`xf \ 1 WARNING$ ......, =,5 ` . '/+- 2 3, 4 0 1'" 3X � o ',: E,_11111111111111111111111 • � I = 4. INSTALL UTILITIES (WATER, SANITARY SEWER, ELECTRIC, PHONE, FIBER GENERAL NOTES WALKABLE MLKABLF F R \�r�� \- - - - -' lLC - J ,;7, 7" J!,• ,- •', ° --A �`-- R' M/," 7_ .� , ', - I/+" , o•. ;.�: OPTIC, ETC) PRIOR TO SETTING FINAL GRADE OF BIORETENTION DEVICE. VIWFd[f M(t ""FACE ��= I % \ B 3AI,r,�p 1 �® l"J '` n °• I • ' " ° sVv�` _ p 1 6"Z RL 1 ,, .. H 5. ROUGH GRADE THE SITE. IF BIORETENTION AREAS ARE BEING USED AS 1. IN THE EVENT THAT SEDIMENT IS INTRODUCED INTO THE BMP DURING OR GD)��� �b - "Ega;LST i_ 24" 2 2 B -1z" ° I 2,• ° e-12 OPTIONAL SILL cuRe WHEN SIDEWALK TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS LEAVE A MINIMUM OF 3 FEET OF COVER IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWING EXCAVATION, THIS MATERIAL SHALL BE 2 I Z F4AER CL1�4 P{p , 4-0. ," �" •• sRu°RFACC • ^ -' .. , I PERPENDICULAR I °NDN PERPENDICULAR • °� G r IS AT HACK OF CURB Uj PAVED FLARES plEASUREo AT FRONT FACE4OFPCURBNRE°� D FOR CURB MACHINE PLACEMENT AROUND RADIUS (3� CONCRETE SILL TO BE USED ONLY WHr'I OVER THE PRACTICE TO PROTECT THE UNDERLYING SOILS FROM REMOVED FROM THE PRACTICE PRIOR TO CONTINUING CONSTRUCTION. ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACE FOR A UIM-6" LENGTH (MEASURED ALOMG FLOW LINE) , ° r {REGARDLESS OF RAMP TYPE) SPECIFIED IN TC PLAIT. PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE [DRB & GUTTER DETAIL CLOGGING. N DETECTABLE EDGE WITW QK INSET B lu++P CURB ANp DurTL1� MILL VERTICAL SAxCuT BIT. 6. PERFORM ALL OTHER SITE IMPROVEMENTS. 2. GRADING OF BIORETENTION DEVICES SHALL BE ACCOMPLISHED USING LANDING , Ofi Lp P,°EYE"' C]s.t� 7. PLANT ALL AREAS AFTER DISTURBANCE. LOW -COMPACTION EARTH -MOVING EQUIPMENT TO PREVENT L2 � PGE°ATE ARUM LOGE 2" B,TUMINOIiS EXISTING BIT. REMOVE & REPLACE ExISN WG Bll, ' ^ rAfIN-WALRAII6E EDGE OF I - 3 I/4•' MIN TO PAVEMENT III A PATCH PAVEMENT BIr.PAVEMENT g. CONSTRUCT BIORETENTION DEVICE UPON STABILIZATION OF COMPACTION OF UNDERLYING SOILS. L J NON -WALKABLE RAMP ROAD ^ ' I'2': MA%. _ SURFACE SURFACE RAILROAD `f J 6" CONCRETE WALK O • .....".1.. 0 8 d d 0�'�A , GATE ARM API r CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA. z U6 H6, I CONCRETE m CONCRETE 7 8 - 2 FLARE FLARE I PROJECTED tlACA DF GlWltl! •:° 11... .-'° . rr°, ° ° °• 3. ALL SUB MATERIALS BELOW THE SPECIFIED BIORETENTION DEPTH 1'YIMIYW 6 ,.5' 4.75' 7 r- - FLOW LINE EDGE OF WALK 3 B.TS' FRONT gpFTGUTTER J " O 21�~� •:.A- 2}9. 2 I -4-I F^C}-I _ r r- oo , MAX (ELEVATION) SHALL BE UNDISTURBED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. LO W 1/9' A e SAWCUT PAVED FLARES G R RAILROAD CROSSING . SAWCUT 1517_ VARIABLE DEPTH [ON[RCTr PAVFUFNT AC1,IAf,EN1 TO NON-WALKABLESURF1Cf _ PLAN VIEW PAVEMENT LOHGRETAIN ExISTING BIO -FILTRATION BASIN (RAIN GARDEN - TYP.) Q 2 EDGE OF a ° INSET A EXISTING B17. J T ' ROAD ° " A PAVEMENT 2" B1T,PA7CH CONCRETE PAVEMENT 4 NOTESc '• a°- ° Q k Q '•'••••! SEE STANDARD PLATE 7038 AND THIS SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS ON DETECTABLE WANING. L 2q. 8-12" ^ O RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNING RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNING A WALKABLE SURFACE IS OEFINED AS A PAYED SURFACE ADJACENT 10 A CURB RAMP WITHOUT " - Rr' O LANDING RAISED OBSTACLES THAT COULD MISTAKENLY BE TRAVERSED BY A USER WHO M VISUALLY IMPAIRED. ' I 'A a -A °, a o • a o o' o e t I M H 1 OFTFCTARI F FQGF WITHOUT CLIRR ANO GUTTFR CONCRE7E FLARE LENGTHS ADJACENT 10 NON -WALKABLE SURFACES SHOULD BE LESS THAN 8' LONG NStI B V I Y/2 fI'' LL�J �!�MEASUNEU ALONG THE RAMPS FROM THE BACK Of [DRB. OUTFLOW GLITTER �T + -' ' ` ° p ' ° • ° 4 . �- - V Uj RAMP l'J 0" CURB HEICH7. Q I �� 4 _ r • °�-�-'may°�` r -,. LL..a NON•RALKABLE rte/ ', NDN•WALKABLE 7 FLLL CURB "[16X7. 1 1.3 MIN. IAPER 24•M,µ a a . a . SURFACE SIRIFACE u ONLY ALLOWED PER ENGINEER'5 APPROVAL i;6 1v61 7 2'rOR 4" HIGH CURB AND I -FOR 6' WITH CURB. US PREFERRED TAPER GRADED GRADED Q 4 I (UPSTREAM SIDE) < z:O °FLARE m FLARERADED Q SIDE rRr�,TIEHTs ARE .PPLIcADL{ To ALL RAMI TIRES AND sNwuLp BE /MPLEMEnTED As NEEDED AS FIELD I PAVEMENT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN FRONT OF CURB & CUTTER CONDITIONS DICTATE. THE ENGINEER SMALL OEICRYTN[ THE RAMP STOE TREATMENTS BASED ON MAINTENANCE FOR USE ON CURE RAMP RETROFITS 'fl"%j:.- OF BOTH ROADWAY AND SIDEWALK. ADJACENT PROPERTY CONSIDERATIONS. AND W171CATIMS CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS. 1 - 2 1 r � -i 2 f /'T!/ ",?, y U}\\\}� 9 05 TYPICALLY USED FOR MEDIANS AND ISLANDS. a ' /N _ i ,.'.I r. - - - - I NOTESr vJ `r fl.. f•'^ '� ' \ © wHCN NO CONCRETE FLARES ARC PROPOSED, TILE CONCRETE WALK SHALL BE PORMED AND CONSTRUCTED 1 0`�I.�_ •� /I o,;�r% \' PERPENDICULAR TO THE EDGE OF ROADWAY. MAINTAIN 3^ MAx.6EIWEEN EDGE OF DOMES AND EDGE OF CONCRETE. o I POSITIVE FLOW LINE DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGH THE PfOfSTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE IPARI ATA 2Y. MAXIMUM. GRADED FLARES y <'ll�l�1 ,r.,, Q ; I NO PDNDING SHALL TI PRESENT IN THE PAR. ` ` `� ,� T jr NO CIRC ANO GUTTCII IS PLACED IN RUR 0.L HMIMO NS. DET rb-LIS E ATH In S SHALL DC FY L Cir it FROM 1�' ANY VERTICAL LIP THAI OCCURS AT THE FLOW LINE SMALL NOT BE GREATER THAN l/4 [MGH. /{'s, �� THE Flrt IY R17uu1NIX15 RoIOWAY aN6/0A B11L1MINd15 SHARED -USE PISN 70 PROVIDE VISUAL roNTRdST_ _ TANGENT HOLD T ENGEN 5' ]O FOR USC E. CURB CUTS WHERE THE PEDESTRIAN'S PATH OF TRAVEL IS ASSUMED PERPENDICULAR L THE CUTTER \fix` - 2' OD ALL CDNSTRIlClEO CURDS MIST IMYC A CONTINUOUS OCTCCTADLE EDGE FOR SITE VISUALLY IMPAIRED. � PAST OITf510L ZERO -'---'-' \ ® \_ j �� TNIS S ARE ABL[ EDGE A DEEB ABLE EDGE WHEN THE WHEREVER 7)S W IS ZERO -INCH HICK CURB -CURB I ' FLOW LINE. RAMP TYPES INCLUDE. PF:P MESTLAR. TIERED OF TRAVEL ASSUMED N AND DIAGONAL RAMPS. 7` TAPERS ARE CONSIDERED A DETECTABLE EDGE xHEN THE TAPER STARTS WITHIN D" OF THE EDGE OF THE _ Q FOR USE AT CURB RAMPS WHERE tHE PEDESTRIAN'S PATH Of TRAVEL IS ASSUMED NDN 0/ 'LANDINGS DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND UJIFOPA4r RISE$ TO A 3 -INCH MINIMUM CURB HEIGHT. 4NY CURB NOT PART PERPENDICULAR TO Tiff GUTTER FLOW LILAC. RAMP TYPES ]NCLUDCI FANS & DEPRESSED CORNERS. l/2• A. OF A CURB TAPER AND LESS THAN 3 INCHES Ix HEIGHT IS NOT CONSIDERED A DE7EC7a BLE EDGE ANO - I /• 3 W cup B OCSICN Y -\ V.- CD BEGIN CUTTER SLOPE TRANSITION JO- OF ALL CURB RAMPS. CURB DESIGN Y 6" ," TNEREFVRC IS NOT COMPLIANT WITH ACCE551BILITY STArDARGS. / TURF OR ,Q THERE SHALL BE NO VERTICAL D15COfAT ]NUITIES GREATER THAN 1/,". < < �.m _j SEE PEDESTRIAN SEE PEDESTRIAN CONCRETE TGP DF GUTTER Q OHILL ANO GRWI ] - N0. 4 72" LONG RE[Nf UHCEMENI BAR [EPO%Y C00.TEUi WITH 3" MIN. COYER, - .. - f[RR BL IN'ORCCMINT BAIL', Ant NOT WEDGO IF TIE APPROACH NOSG IS Pf"I) ]NTCGRAL WITH TIIC V GURO. / $YALE RAON$ - �,_ 4 ELEVATION CHANGE TARES PLACE rROM THE CxISTING TO NEW FRONT OF CUTTER, APPROACH NOSE R++P APPROACH NDS[ "A . DESILN V 2' -)'TYPICAL PATCH IS USED TO MATCH THE NEW GUTTFR FACE INTO THE EXISTING ROADWAY, -k ------/- DETAIL OEfgll 1 ;, ® URILL AND URWI 2 - M.4 IC' LUN() REINFORCEMENT BARS IEPVXT LOA fEUI W11H 3" Min. I: UYEN. REInFVHCEMENT - 5Q VARIABLE MIDTN FOR DIRECTIONAL [IRB APPLICA-ricm SEE SHEET 2 FOR DIRE[7[ORAL TURF, SLOPE Rrouwwrw,. NON -WALKABLE NDN -WALKABLE 7" B 0 BARS ARE NOT NCCOEO IF THE APPAOACN NOSE 1S POLACD IWTCCAAL WITH THE CURB AHD CVTTER, °�° AL. + � 20' MAX. RECOMMENDED ¢ 7 TOP FRONT OF CTITTFA SHALL RE CONSTRUCTED FLtTSH WITH PROPOSED ADJACENT PAVEMENT ELEVATION. r^ 0 Uj SURFACE m SURFACE T ©SLUG INCL ft ilI 6'LO GGI -OWN RN6 w IG CU INITIAL THE I U LS 4LANDINMAIGLT LtYLL WHIR SHL hULI - wW /• O A.W/ 70 NOT AFFECT PARKING TOP LS" OF THE GUTTER FACE IA1157 BE A FORMED EDGE. PAR CUTTER SHALL NOT BE OVERLAID. A HEIGHT CURB U.E. 6REFER RAMP FOR 6" L 2 O MOC NHEN THE INITIAL LANDING IS MORE THAN 1" BELOW O SECTION A -A FULL TETCHY CURB REFER TO SHEETS 1 5 2 TO MOOFFY THE CURB x[ICHT TAPERS AND MAINTAIN POSITIVE /! o w / ©SIlOR1L0 BE USED AT VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AREAS WHEN 0.T A DRAINAGE H[GH POINT OR SUPER ELEVATED ROADWAY SEGMENTS. 2 L 2 CURE & 2Q BOLLEYAll OR. 11. GUTTER / ®NEIRCST EDGE (Ir pETCf,., WARNING SIXRFACES SHALL BE PLAT -EO 121 MINIMUM TO 15'MAX]UI1M FROM THE HOLD TANGENT 5' � H 4 09 DRILL AMC GJ NO. EPDXY-{DATED ]B" LONG TIF BARS AT jp" CENTER TO 2 2' NEAREST RAiL.FOR SKEWED RAILWAYS IN RO INSTANCE SHALL THE DETECTABLE WARNING BE CLOSER THAN 12' PAST OUTSIDE ZERO y w LARGE RWows cCHr171 ikro ExISTFrAc cpHORer{ PAVEMENT )'MINIMUM FRAM ALL JOTnrs, � J TURF OR 6" / MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO THE NEAREST RAIL. / - ?OL401TYPICAL ® HELPS PROVIDE TWO SEPARATt RAMPS, REDUCLS THE DOME $LTBACK LENGTH AMU MINIMIZE$ PjREC7LjMAL CURB. RETURNED CURB (D r, 1,3 41 ]APER INIS RADIUS OCSIGN CLOSELY FOLLOWS THE TURNING VEHICLE PATH WHILE OPTIMIZING CURB RAMP LENGTH. O CONCRET� TOP OF SIDEWALK / U @ w1.Fk PrOrSIgrm F.ATFS ARF PROVIDED_ RFTFF.TAIU F WARNING, %HWrAC.CS SNAII (DOWNSTREAM SIOEI ��.=LUU ISL - - - - - BE PLACED ON THE SIDE OF THE GATES OPPOSITE THE RAIL. 2, FROM THE Q1 CURB EXTEWSARAI SHOULD L USED In VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED CONSIbtRE0FUSUALLY IA SIN TRS[ TIONS W 3EGM£NTS IS LI ON-Sf8EET PARMUS IS AVAILABLE CURB EAS DESMI SHOULD E PUSH BUTTON FOR hTI INTERSECTIONS SHE[ WHERE SPACE IS LFMITED. TYPICAL SIDE TREATMENT OPTIONS OO © H h/] y Q2 y © A APPROACHING SIDE SH THE GATE RRM.THIS CRITERIA N[GOVERNSTOVER NOTE SMALL RAORIS PUSH BUTTONS MUST MEET APS CRITERIA AS DESCRIBED IN 7HL PUSH BUTTON LOCATION DETAIL SHEET. ♦n 6" I _ ®CRO551 ME SURFACE SHALL EER IS 2'MI. NOS PAST THC OUTSIDE EDGE OF QUALM OR SHARED-u5E PATH. 2'•I0'IYf[CAU ` ®PLACE BOND BREAKER BETWEEN WALK Af10 70P OF SILL. ��Y/ B A„ T @3'FOR MEDIANS AND SPLITTER ISLANDS. NOSE CAN BE REDUCED TO 2, ON FREE R1GH7 fSLANDS. COMBINED DIRECTIONAL ® ® 1/Y PREFORMED JOINT FILLER PER MN007 SPEC. 3702. sIDENALK rO BC PLACED &75• MIN. FROIA THE FACE OF CURB/PROJECTED FACE OF CURB. THIS (COMPOUND RADIUS) SEC7IDN 6-8 ®ENSURES U[N.CLFARANCE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND CATE ARM f.MFNTERWEMHT SILPPDRTS. DIMEMS[ON TO BE SAM[ AS SIDEWALK THILNNE55, 4" MIN. ,�� ADA CURB EXTENSION WITH COMPOUND RADIUS )BUMP 011TI© Cn PEDESTRIAN APPROACH ♦AI'WIro." "L"""' `WWub DIRECTION OF TRAFFIC � 0 REVIS[ONA Nose DETAIL �_ REDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS REVISION E PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP pE,IAIl.S (FDR RETURNED CURB ,,�'" MAIN STREET _ ,,,,��RR'''' I_ LU APFR YElh JAMFANY T3, Z017 �jI HFI - APPROyEp APPR YEDs JANUARY 23, 2017 S �j/FV) - PpppOYEq q SIDE TREATMENT) ^ _ WWW ,___ `"'mru+'' STATEOESII;HEkGroEER 1-23-2017 STANDARd PLAN 5-297^250 4 OF 6 '-� 11 �"'.... �'" `�` rF TW* STATE FE51On ONG11EU 1-23-2017 STANDARD PLAN 5-297,250 3 0 4, U � w CI_ NOTFS: \\ 2 PLAN VIEW LANDINGS SNALL RE LOCATED ANYWHERE THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE IPARI CHAKCES \ \ O \ 0 ,K• DIRECTION. AT IRE TOP OF RAMPS THAT eAYE RUNNING SLOPES GREATER THAN 5.0%. \\\ "TIL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, WALKABLE AND IF THE APPROACHING WALK IS INVERSE GRADE. `1} SURFACE INITIAL Cl1Ra RAMP LANDINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN 15'FROU THE BACK \\\ \ 2 SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS V OF CURB. WITH 6'111M THE 51" 01 CUM$ BEING THE PREFERRED DISTANCE, ONLY \ NON -CONCRETE � KkiSTINC IR' SIDEWALK [MISTING I APrucAOLE wn5n THE InrnAL RAMP RunnlnG SLOPE Is OVER S,DA, NON -CONCRETE PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT \ BOULEVARD BOULEVARD SIDEW,Lx YAH, REPLACEMENT SIDEWALK 5 WHEN CURB RAMP LSLOPE 5 ARE ATERIR[D FDR EVERY 30" OF VERTICAL RISE LAMBING \ SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY Q RAMP RHEN THE CURB SLOPE IS GREATER THAN B.OY.. \ \ LAX INN �( }� Q CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTEU ALONG ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR. 1/4" DEEP VISUAL SD'2 VAX- / LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER 2'MAx JOINTS SHALL BE USED AT THE TOP GRADE °PEAR OF CONCRETE FLARES ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACES. ® °' m ALL MAUL BREAK$ WITHIN 7HL PAR $WALL Bt PERPENDICULAR To THE PATH OF TRAVLL, \ \ UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF B% lO .1 SLOPE THIS BOTH SIDES OF A SLOPEO WALKING SURFACE MUST BE EWAL LENGTH. ` LANDING LANDING Q IU LN5UML INITIAL XAWP AMU 10111AL tAMpINU$ APL PHUFLHLT 4ON51Myt(LG,LAMDINLS \\ \ V O O 2 SAW CONCRETE $IDEWAL% MINNESOTA. SHALL BE CAST SEPARATELY. FOLLOW SIOEWALN REINFORCEMENT DETAILS ON SHEET Q AND \ \ j IULL ULPIX INC tX151LNU TILE AOA SPECIAL PROVISION )PROSECUTION OF WORKS. \ \ \ JOINT Nt CUK LX A I 0" B TOP OF CLMB SHALL MATCH PROPOSED ADJACENT WALK GRAM. \\\ \ \ PROFILE VIEW 1� m0 5 WHEN THE BOULEVARD IS 4'WICE OR LESS. THE TOP OF CURB TAPER SHALL MATCH THE RAMP \ \ NON -WALKABLE SLOPES 70 REDUCC NEGATIVE BOULEVARO SLOPES PROM THE TOP BACK OP CURB TO THE PAR. \ \ \ \ \ \ � 4 T� T/2 © SURFACE ALL RAMP TTPE5 SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM 3'LONG RAMP LENGTH, \ \ O'NNB��L'� \ Co BETE CONCRETE �^ ` \ \ \ I \ \ ' BOULEVARD 60ULEVARD /� f SL 4'YININLWF WIDTH OF DETECTABLE WARNING IS REWIRED FOR ALL RAMPS. DETECTABLE WARNINGS ,,f �- '" ±�� Matthew R. Pavek o" {R. SNALL CON7IN0005LY EXTEND FOR A MIN. OF 24" IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL. OETECTAULE \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ''' (TYPICAL) `A 0.. U -O %ARNIMC TO COVER ENTIRE WIOTx OF SxdREO-USE PATH AND THE ENTIRE PAR WIDTH OF \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ R 5 5 5 5 ,n"„J, 0 BOOK OF Lliffi THE WALK. DETECTABLE WARNING SHOULD BC 6" LESS THAN THE ERRTHAN WIDTH. ARC O O O O OPTIONAL SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 , FLOW LINE DIRECTIONAL RAMP WALKABLE FLARE LENGTH OF RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHOULD NOT BE 9REATER THAN 20 FEET.% 0" EA'yyy�111Ax o1 EDGE OF TrNiOUG,I LANE SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT T9 BE USED �FRUNI DE .11. RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE SETBACK C MINIMUM TO 6" MAXIMUM FROM THE BACK OF CURB. ONLY NHEN SPECIFIED In THE PLAN. SEE NOTESti�U & �j FON INFORMATION REGARDING RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNING PLACEMENT, ID MATCH FULL CURB HEIGHT. 1.0% MIN, COMBINED DIRECTIONAL 0 Q 3• HIGH [UPR WHEN USING A 3'1.3 G RAMP 6.08 MAX. EXPANSION MATERIAL PLACEMENT FOR OPTIONAL CURB LINE REINFORCEMENT O ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY ," H[GN NRB WHEN USING A 4' LONG RAMP- l.dX Y[H. 4 CONCRETE AND BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS PLACEMENT ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS Qj 3^ MINIMUM CURB HEIGHT IS.S' )MIN. DISTANCE REWIRED BETWEEN DMJ£SI 5.0'/. MAX. DATE DESCRIPTION ,^ PREFERRED (T'MIM.DISTAnCC REDuIRED BETWEEN DOMES). N. MAX. SAWCUT / {4J THE 'BUWP" IN BETWEEN THE RAMPS SHOULD NOT BE IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL FOR COMBINED DIRECTIONAL rxpros[D FAX EXI5TTNG CURB / RAMPS. 1F Tx1$ attLRs MODIFY THE RAMP Locdu°N OR SWITCH RAMP TO A Fan/DEPgesSED tuq"ER. CUM AND GUE! .nD c TTER 2/15/19 CITY SUBMITTAL EDGE 4F THROUGH LAN[ CIN I2 ADE 5 WHEN USING CONCOCT[ PAYED FLARES ON THE OUTSIDE OF DIRECTIONAL RAMPS. AND ADJACENT TO 0. °'�o' ° 5®% BR's O WALKABLE SURFACE. OIRECTIOn4L RAI,[ ELOPES SHOULD BE USED. SEC THE DETAIL ON THIS SHEET. \ PEOESIRIAN RAMP PEUESIRIAN R.MP NON -WALKABLE SURFACE h'�I 1 RAMP BREW[ RAMP '\ \ \ \ \ \ WW 3• MINE •- T. MIN. I I Q iQ MAX. T.DY. SLOPE © GRADING SHALL ALWAYS BE USED WHEN FEASIBLE. v CURB. IF USED. SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE SIDCwALN \ \ i MAX. 2AX SLOPE 1N ALL DIRECTIONS LIMITS WHEN RICHT GF WAY ALLOWS. WHEN AOJAC[NI TO PARKSNO LOTS, CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS TAPKPC UP id 2.OL 2Ax MAH. OR lP ,P ,O 2.0'4 .Y,�` O" IN ALL DIRECTIONS \ \ \ CRANK,[ TO ,X CHANGE 2.OY. MAX. OR UP ,- TO 2.0% - SHOULD BE USED OVER Y CURE 70 REDUCE TRIPPING HAZARDS AND F0.CILIlATE SNOW A ICE REMOVAL. ,� CHANGE T9 IX CHANCE CHANGE ` � • A�•" ��.y�. OT MAY_ 2 -Ox SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTICNS IN FRONT OF GRADE BREAK ANO BRAIN TO FLOW LINE SHALL BE \ \ \ \ o • SAWCUT © O" I CONSTRUCTED INTEGRAL WITH CURB AND GUTTER. \ T���pL�� FLOW LINE PROFILE TABLE - TWIN PERPENDICULARS r iii��� vRppg5E0 C FOR USE oN culls RAMP RET RaFITs (D -Hl D ®8 C l0'J. WALMADHE FLARE 'A�\\ /Z�4_ CURD AND GUTTER S - - - L - {R" 9 PLACE DOMES AT THE CAIN OF CURD WHEN ALLOWABLE SETBACK CRITERIA IS EXCEEDED. KADLC \ \ PEDESTRIAN RAMP 'U'D OUTT�+ REINFORCEMENT O U--__-------�� 1 D" O BACKOfCURBSAMWALKABLEWHEN S RADJACENT 70 FACE I$ DEFINED AS A0. ARRAYED SURFACE"0.0'JONE ACENTC TO AR SET N' ORB R FROM \ \ \ w LP TO 2 -OX UP TO 2.OX FRONT EDGE OF DETECTABLE WARNING SHALL DE SET OACR 2'MAXIMUM WHEN ADJACENT TO. WAL 2 -OX MAH. OR LL CxANDC TO 4X .HIB[. Q AARP {RANGE OPTIONAL CURS LINE REINFORCEMENT DETAILS QQ HQ © WITHOUT RAISED OBSTACLES THAT COULD MISTAKENLY BE TRAVERSED BY A USER WHO 15 V15UALLY \ \ �/ IMPAIRED. FLOW LINE PROFILE "TABLE" -FAN IF NON{ON[RETE RLYD. IS fON57RUG IED AND IS �K;� \ \ � 36" N0.+'. LE55 THAN 2'IN WIDTH AT TOP OF CI1R6 : k:! xGCIPnUUL4H UG IGCI0.BLG WARMINUS MAY tl[ SG ItlALK lR' IU Y" NHUM INE BAER O UUHtl WITH GDHnGHS LANDING 1.0% MIN. TRAN51TJON.PAV£ CONCRETE RAMP WIDTH TO SCT 3° FROM BACK OF CVRD. IF B" SETBACK IS EXCEECEO USE RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS. SOX MAX. AD,ACENT BACK OF CURD. °ETSETABLE WRITER) L5 LXCCNT WNffN \ PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP S"I� SETBACK LRnENu LS ExcEEatG ® W R DIRECTIONAL OV RS WITH THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS PLACED AT THE BALK OF [LRB, THE DETECTABLE \ \ \ I`' LANDING AND rho5HELP SHALL COVER INC ENTIRE ER OC OF THE WA THE ATH.PATI THIS ENSURES A DETECTTRAVEL. [OCE \ LOX Miry 1.OX Y]N, TAX MIN. ].pq LIN• l'.... REND HELPS ELIMINATE THE CURB TAPER OBSTRUCTING THE PAT OF PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL. \ $.OX YAH, IBX PREFERRED S.OX WX. 1.5% LFERFED S.MF MAA. L4iDInG 11 STANDARD ONE WAY DIRECTIONAL O ONE-WAY DIRECTIONAL WITH DETECTABLE ® \ g INE CON[PE1 WALK N ESC BE FORMED ANO COIPSTRU[TEO PERPENDICULAR TO THE BACK OF CURS. / N0.1NTA1N 3" BETWEEk EDGE OF DOMES ANO EDGE OF CONCRETE. \ I6" MAX. WARNING AT BACK OF CURB TO BE USED Ton ALL DrnccnonAL nAMP3,4xCEPT WHERE DOMES anE PLACED ALanc THE Bgcrc or tune. \ FLOW LINE PROFILE RAISE -TWIN PERPENDICULARS Iz" �, 3" °' HH. % \ PEDESTRIAN RAMP 12" K'• 35" MA N D \ I.OT YIN. III YIN- I.OL YIN. X. 36" 1 --) $.OX MAH, LSX PREdERREO $.OX YA%, MAX. MAX. 35" MAX. 12K 6^ CONCREIE WALK %5 3" MINIMUM CLASS s LEGEND 2 FLOW LINE PROFILE RAISE - FAN 12" T. I'. 12• . � , ACOMB TE BASE /�) i TM5E LOIXGITUD,NAL SLOPE RANGE SNALL BE THE STARTING POINT.IF SITE CURB LINE AND ROAD CRO55ING ADJUSTMENTS SEf ABATE LANDING �•J I.O%YIN- EXHIBITIONS WARRANT.LONGITUOINAL SLOPES UP TO 9.3% OR FLATTER ARE ALLOWED. POUR REINIrORCEMENT 2.OY. MAX- YAR. RAMP - _ _ NOTES. 5 INDICAI[S E[OESTRI0.N RAMP - ELGPE SHALL III OCTWEEN O ES: RAMPR.: •' ^; '°- I TABLING" OF -EN A` CAS MEANS NAA STOP O LESS THAN ZX CROSS SLOPE WRMN A CROSSWALK. 4 E {•a - {L.-� SAY. MINIMUM AND A.3'/. HALL NO IN THF OIRFf.TI °N SHOWN IS REWLREO WHEN A ROADWAY F5 [N A STOP OFi YIELD COND[T[MI AM THE PROJECT SCOPE ALLOWS. 1 ni ENSURE NAFFS AND n MAN ARE P"OPLHLY CONS AND[TLA, ALL INITIAL 1,Y IN A IN P IpF' OF R HRNdPEU oLm. L _ _ AND THE CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT FEGEED 2.0%. O FELLOW NG SLpf'E GRL0.T[R TI IAN 2X1 S110.LL BF FORMED AND RACLp $EP0.RATELY IN AN INDEPENDENT CONCRC7C rOUR- Q INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - $LOPE SHALL $E GREATER RECONSTRUCTION BION PROJECTS)CWI LFULLKS APAVEMENTLL OCU REPLACEMENT PROJECTS FOLLOW SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DETAILS DN THIS SHEET 1011 ILL SEPARATELY POURED INITIAL LANDINGS_ NON -WALKABLE OR y THAN 2.0% AND LESS THAN 5.0% IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN 'LADLING" 4F LENT IRE CROSSWALK SHALL OCCUR WHEN FEASIBLE, \ WALKABLE SURFACE rT;. A -; TYPICAL 'SIDEWALK SECTION 111 Aft? CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2_OY.. ® DRILL AND GROUT MO. l2• LONG REINFORCE>.ENT BARS Al 36°' MAXIMUM CENTER ' , • MILL & OVERLAY PROJECT&"TABLING' OF FLOW LINES, IN FRONT OF THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP. TO CENTER KEPDXY COATED]. BARS TO RE ADJUSTED TO MATCH RAMP GRADE. U\ ' °6• COwFtr7r WALK WITHIN INTERSECTION CORNER ® 2 (IN SLOPE ]N ALL DIRECTLON;.LANDTNG SHALL BE LFUL'LL WIDTH OF INCOMING PARC. PAVEMENT CAN N07 MAX 15 REQUIRED THEN EXTEND EXISTING INTO TIC 71R000H LLAANLETADLLC TIC R�LINE 10 ING OF 2% OR AS O3 BRILL HETI GOUT 2 - „0.4 x 12" LONG REINFORCEMENT BARS ICPOKY COATF°I. BACK OF CURB LOCH AS POSSIBLE WHILE ADHERING TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, REINFORCEMENT REOUIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS wITNIN RADIUS. 0 K" CURB HEIGHT LISAA MAX. CRS5-SLOPE OF THE (HOOD Or HIS OPTIONAL CURB LIME RETNFORrFMENT DETAIL SHOULD ONLY BE FLOW LIN[ 2, SAX MAX. GRp$S-SLOP[ OF THE ROAD U T SECTION U -D TS"TARLF" FI OR I IE IIP r0 4X r.HANrr FRBY FXiST1Nf. %I OPF IN rRAW XR PFRE[TRTAN RAW USED ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS WHEN SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN, N"DNI CN GUTTER 4}11P TO 2X CHANGE IN FLOW LINE FROM EXISTING SLOPE BEYOND THE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP 5Q 112 IN. PREFORMED JOINT rILLER MATERIAL PEA M,W1 SPEC. 3762. DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK STAND-ALOI5NEp ANDEA RETROFITS, FOLLOW MILL 6 OVERLAY CRITERIA ABOVE HOWEVER ALL PAVEMENT PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 RP ENT °ON RI7x 617UMarli5 PATCHING ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS AND FULL -DEPTH APRON CURD FOR DIRECTIONAL RAMPS ® +`Marra,/ •"• SPL �C M CUNCRE[ E R A Ars. 4%toWrRd' -1 REVISION �N ///111 l PE CURB RAMC' DEiAIL_5 REVISION: RAISING OF CURB LINES SHOULD OCCUR IN VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AR£AS.RAISE THE CURB LINES ENOUGH TO S ///1,1 PEDES iRIAN CURB RAMP DH AILS ��©� G ALLOW COMPLIANT RAMPS T. A$ MUCH A5 P95518LE WHILE AOHER]NG TO THE FplLOR1NG CRITERIA= ©S / REVISION SUMMARY APPq YEOs JAFAIARY 23'.2017 V*jAFPFMvcu APPq VEOs JANUARY 23.2017 2 1.L Y MIN. AND s.BA MnxIMEI GRU5 DE of OF THE ROAD 11 4 rcp 21 I.0% MIN. FLOW LINE [ON EITHER SIDE OF PEDESTRIAN RAMP) TO MAINTAIN P65ITFYE DRAINAGE "�` �""' 41LNG1RUUl"ALLEfWGHLANLC MAX. WHOipwAT IAPER55F#AAUBEI' VEII[1CALPLAiS'HURI2HIAL ,.,.A` 1-23-2017 STANDARD PLAN 5-297°250 C OF wT++'� SfdfENESIpCMW4rW 1 �3-2017 ST�IJD�RQ PLAN 5-297050 0� 41 SLAT[ DCSIGk [N4REER DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL DETAILS C502 1 2/14/2019 4:59 PM 0 COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. IS me � r• � :v' >' ,"'iii :" � � G �j gill ANIL- .17 j�� M.� � mss:. .` � � � 1 `••, � ��/ �Y(• �i 2MR1111111 -4.11L C W11 law, 0 Y �! ��il4r'''•2;., n- a ;.� '� � :�' i_,.. YHA �•� t� ��� ��� lid 11 11 �.�•�� �" ��17� �� 7i ♦ �� M,r • . • win Mal �l. i INN !*-.��' + 1 '1. �� o , `.■`�:•. , . .` � .`. ``1 �'\ �`. `, � tri �i� '������, ��• ����. ` ° �•. �� i' \ % �� F ��/ �I �� ill 11 � ■. � 1+�� � �/�� / �1 �� �� ql� ERIC- 2007 _Cdye �. � `•�� <�� ��, /i ] it -ll. i! 1 � � , - ��_, I ��/I ■i �r� f �� II� ���� � � �� ����� ��1}�% � it �� �-� ♦•� j �1 I � � 1 �� �/ � ��� •� rr. ��� �s`�.•1�� ,� ` �Y �.♦•�`•, `i.-\ / .J,.,,� /I iy� -,I •-R7�� 11 �ILis `•• - 71\��,`-' . I,I�' ��r • _ ■ ■ r�J �� � ���:v r,� � ` i�'S1� ~.<�• Vii• ,\ �� �' ��/ /I t+T�'' 1��w 11 .•,-���, ■��zsi ' � � i� IS `, i ±'► - ' IL ♦ It ■ ■I• _. z r 2 �■ --' -- _ _ ilk' ,✓ /' r ■i a PA RKING\Lb!T/1SLANDAREA 616.3 SF '•��� ■ `, �! �Jsa , 'i'C ,+� .�� II I:' [,�V' ^' • fit♦�i ♦I. , �� i� �1 I, (•,r,'' �, s��il� '� `-`y- ���� • �r �,� �. �J'i III 11 ' ��' �•• I ,�'- - ��i'� i � ��� ��• i I] r•1 �. �� QT �� . i i / 1� • i •, p p •;�r ► , �. �'► OXEN �• � � �, / z ._ it I� a �_ r� �� ")' `. • r 1 Wim•-•-• 1 X11 I � � �� ��"/s��r .. • � . . •_•.• •' � � r % .iii► �•' �m� ® -�' , �l ..-•=.r.��. •z•� �� ��1---���e�ci�:�i ice••. • ate_. . • 'i �9, .I�\ � ,,G� �% _.:: IIS..-•..-.::• ��®� �` , /�'(� � I � I�'��LL..::-.::• IiI��IIL:.:•_�'::: 3W �3`/� ,�1�� ;:'"��� ����� .="�i��i: _ � � i�`�� +► Vii. �� • ��i � >� " •ff�411i�i1- rll!��I-....� ���;.. e : � ,� � p �� � �►�.,;� �. • � ��•' . A ME IN Ile { .. ��•iiaii._:::_r:'_ MIL IY '� �� f .` _.L®iii�IIIII_ ... II�III!i_ 1?; _ • `� l 'i IIIiIII�IILAI;:-IJIEIII�;IL� `i�� �' _ _ _ �. IN CONSTRUCTION le \ i� dam. %ry ■ I►1��♦ ,ll��' ; .TI I►1'':L�I I �i� .�;,' W;'+�. LIMITSi ,y�5� ` �, ems" 3 f►' �9�� 1)�!1•� _ >�, .1 �•.?� /` n,�r•�- � ,� � tea, � � • ���/�• � •L ��� ���. �'� .�•: �� �Ra� • ��� �� ' 1 ' C'ij ' - r'��• :Ii�R �� LANDSCAPE NOTES: 1. WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH (MINIMUM AFTER INSTALLATION AND/OR TOP DRESSING OPERATIONS) OF SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH. 2. ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK. 3. IF SHOWN ON PLAN, RANDOM SIZED LIMESTONE BOULDERS COLOR AND SIZE TO \ I COMPLIMENT NEW LANDSCAPING. OWNER TO APPROVE BOULDER SAMPLES . PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. . 4. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF ` NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR . MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD. 5. UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN ` SHALL GOVERN. 6. CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE z z ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE \\ ', MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR ONE (1) FULL \ GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE. 7. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4" LAYER \ TOPSOIL LOAM AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE \ \\\ DRAWINGS. �H 8. COORDINATE LOCATION OF VEGETATION WITH UNDERGROUND AND OVERHEAD a UTILITIES, LIGHTING FIXTURES, DOORS AND WINDOWS. CONTRACTOR SHALL \ STAKE IN THE FIELD FINAL LOCATION OF TREES AND SHRUBS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 9. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE. 10. REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE �\ CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. 11. SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM co LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. \ 12. REPAIR AT NO COST TO THE OWNER IRRIGATION SYSTEM DAMAGED FROM \ LANDSCAPE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. X2130 � � k�W� WET 13. PROVIDE SITE WIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN AND INSTALLATION. SYSTEM �6-ERC \\� SHALL BE FULLY PROGRAMMABLE AND CAPABLE OF ALTERNATE DATE WATERING. � \\ THE SYSTEM SHALL PROVIDE HEAD TO HEAD OR DRIP COVERAGE AND BE \\ CAPABLE OF DELIVERING ONE INCH OF PRECIPITATION PER WEEK. SYSTEM 4 - KCT \\ SHALL EXTEND INTO THE PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY TO THE EDGE OF \\\ PAVEMENT/BACK OF CURB. \ 14. CONTRACTOR SHALL SECURE APPROVAL OF PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM INLCUDING PRICING FROM OWNER, PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. SEE SHEET L1.1 FOR LANDSCAPE CALCULATIONS & PLANT SCHEDULE LEGEND 2111 KCT fi -� ETWET } } } } } } i SEED TYPE 1 - MNDOT 34-262 WET PRAIRIE, PER MNDOT +++++++++++++, SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014) SEED TYPE 2 - MNDOT 35-221 DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL, PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014) 2109 / UPLAND AREA - 24", 1" DIA. DECORATIVE ROCK MULCH, FABRIC & ROCK MAINT. STRIP WET / , - EDGING, SEE DETAIL, SAMPLES REQUIRED 915.7 PLAYGROUND AREA - SPECIALITY SHREDDED PLAYGROUND MULCH, MI 1 +_ 1 -RBC ' ':�::: --- BroD r 12 DEPTH, INSTALL PER MANUF. SPECIFICATION, SAMPLES REQUIRED. .. 3 - TS ♦ tb.5:.`.,:f + - - - �V �V �V �V SERI 922 22 LTC :w' .cA, •.n = :'. `: Q • _ _ 206 - ALL PLANTING BEDS & SAUCERS - SHREDDED CYPRESS MULCH, i SAMPLES REQUIRED PROVIDE EDGING AS SHOWN ON PLAN 2102 /- - - wET 5 RC SOD "'A2001 -F- -T + --- \I/ \I/ /NSP A s f T 3-T $ �j�' _ _ + + - - - �Y �Y / Wi fi Ease ment 1 s -on Lii 18 �. , >'- - - - + +- + - - - - - - - per Doc. No. 35375E EDGING - HEAVY DUTY VINYL, INCLUDING STAKES, � -7 � - - - - - - - / INSTALL PER MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS & INSTRUCTIONS \ \. c �GJ 1y ST a _ = ..' :�, •.,ice t + + + + W W W 2105 � X WET �PROPOSED CANOPY & EVERGREEN TREE SYMBOLS - SEE 5-AJS � �� ���+ ���� � Ix 21os -7 +- +- +- + - - - - WET SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES +_t �- 2�� % t _ t +_ +_ +_ _ PROPOSED DECIDUOUS AND EVERGREEN SHRUB - _� _� + �_ + _� - - - 1 WW SYMBOLS - SEE SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND WE TL % ND/POND O ••` - t +- t � +- � +- t � + t � +- t � - - 914.5 / � \, �\ � 92 •` ce ••- •�� �. �- - - - - - � PLANTING SIZES 2 'NET +- �� +- + 9 CSL - - CBR I 'NET W W W W NSP Transmissi /' 9•:, +_ ++ ++- t +�l✓t + +- t +- t !JI Rim=919.0 \�jl// �.• : Easement � � � � � + � � � � �- Inv=919.28 w PROPOSED PERENNIAL PLANT SYMBOLS -SEE -T +- 4 +- � -T + -T +- - Inv= 914.2a S per Doc. No. 3.` Inr-913.98 NE SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES ; CONSTRUCTION LIMITS DECORATIVE BOULDERS, 18"-30" DIA. \ GU\\ 92'" 2104 WET 92,9 /\/\� \c ^• \' a Ig RCP,. ,> - W W / / 12122 W W W W 0 • WET::.. . %O ` :,FT �^ �� ' � �-�•..� • S WET >> S Rim=921.9 Q � � �- .;: _ -_- -- - - � - • n - r n Inv=90 1.9 SE ..e .�4,Q '3r" \ ;>.:`. I -zo ice / - _ Know what's beIOW. 1 - 50-0 Inv=905.94 SW \ \ • �Q rCag2p \ WFT 18 - Inv 905'44 NE' �� �� g ��_ a 9 a a ``� Call before you dig. 25'-0° 0 50'-0° Inv=905.40 NW ��\ c 0192 5 „ 2/14/2019 4:59 PM C1070 �Hsote R CM G3 O M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 I L L E P HANSON Cn LU M N L0 U')'�^ z z z W Cn a H -j O am o �LU a 0Wz � az O Q co a LU LL aw Q LU J U) Q 0 z O J LU L0 U) CD �OU W O IY a_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 05FA,�-�- Patrick J. Sarver DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE No. 24904 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE PLAN Ll 00 COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. 1111111 FACE OF BUILDING, WALL, OR STRUCTURE 24" - VERIFY W/ PLAN SLOPE - MIN. 2%, MAX. 5:1 MIN. 3" LAYER OF ROCK MULCH AS SPECIFIED. PROVIDE SAMPLE TO VERIFY W/ GRADING PLAN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION FINISHED GRADE STAKED LANDSCAPE EDGER AS SPECIFIED, SEE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS AND SPECS. FOR INSTALLATION AND PLACEMENT _ WATER PERMEABLE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AS SPECIFIED COMPACTED SUBGRADE AGGREGATE MAINTANENCE STRIP NTS PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN NORMAL TREE SHAPE) THREE 2"X4"X8' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120° TO ONE ANOTHER. WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH NYLON STRAPPING WITH GROMMETS. ALTERNATE STABILIZING METHODS MAY BE PROPOSED BY CONTRACTOR. TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1"-2" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE COMPACT BOTTOM OF PIT, TYP. CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT BALL. IF NON -BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ROCK OR ORGANIC MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM PLANT TRUNK EXISTING GRADE SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT OF ROOTBALL �~ DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING J NTS PLANT TOP OF ROOTBALL 1-2" ABOVE ABOVE REQUIRED TREES PER PARKING LOT CALC. PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE ; - 1� 921.5 i � TC=921.1 GU\920.66 GU`g2G B rGo L�9 TC=920.9 TC=921.6 GU=921.2 916.0 PARCEL ID: 1 8031 21 340001 ADDRESS: 15040 EVERTON AVE N . 11OWNER: ROSSINI STEVEN J \1/ _ _� \1/ \1/ I \L WE T4 / _ 9 8 \� - - S - - - - - - �T - = \V - -' - - 1 \ ---------------+-------- Toi. 91s� - N87030'30"W 1196.83 918.7 2088 1 23 / \ 2029 2026 _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - X - - - 2079 WET 914.2 003`-)I a\N 11/ \1/ \1/ 916.6 WET / �3oX tl°E 2028 / WET \1' 11/ 918.0 1 916.6 / / WET/ / 2080 --917- -_�1978.0 - -� �-____ �� \ ��s� -- �' 279`x§ Q000 \L \L \1/ \U \L \L \� \L \L \L \L 25' Rear Setback Line - -- ✓ 2oa \ \V s ---_ ---------------917- ---- 031 / 027 ,-_-_--_-___ / 2081 , ✓ / WET \ \ _ --� /� - - - Lot Cor I WET / WET i - / _ __ 11/ 11/ 11/ I/ \1/ \1/ - \1/ - - _ _ _ _ _ - - - - X%'� / /' \L \L \ �L -- \L \\,J", \L \L \1! _ -� - - - - - �' - - - ' \L W/ /�\ \l -9`5 _F- J �1C1 avEr\\ s�\\ - - - -916- �CP �Qj \L \L \L \ly \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 14/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \L \L \1/� \L / \1/ \L \i¢ �1/ \T/ 2� \1/ I \1/ \L \L \ \1/ \L 6`° \ 11 c�\L \1/ \L \L \L \L \L \L /No -" I W€ wEr2 j \\ \ 2082 �11T WET wEr \\ sa\\ Q __ Wetland Covenant Area per Doc. /=ryN 15/ i /� y \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ I y \1/ y \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1.1 I\1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ ; % \1/ \1/ / \1/ '%' \\ \1/ \lis` \ \1, ;' -� No. 766372 \j, ;' \ \j, ----�; _ -� `/ / \1/ �% /\ i I I ------------- UPLAND AREA ---------------- --"' \ s 1 ` X 2089 - S6 \ `�. tK or' V / \1/ \1/ 11/ 11/ \1/ \1/ 11/ \1/ \V L A � D 11/ \1/ - \ \1/ \ \l/ \1/ \1/ \L \1/ 11/ \1/ WET \l/ \l/ / \1/ \1/ sr\�c \1/ �\ \l/ \1/ \1/ �L \1/ \1/ \l/ \1/ \1/ 1 \ " 2021 \I/ \I/ \1/ jjjl���\ I�1/ \I/ \1/ \I/ 4/ \I/ � •Q � \I/ \I/ �\j/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \I/ \1/ \I/ i �l/ \I/ \I/ 1� �l/ \I/ \D \ \ \I/ \I/ WE %V NO \I/ h� I `\ I WET 2033 9 \\ �S w A� c, 1 \1` WET \ \1/ \L \L \1/ \1/ \ \L \L \1/ \L \L \1/ ' � \1/ \L \L \1/ � �\L �\L SSJ-t6O � \ p \1/ 'I \L \L \1/ q°3� �L�' � / /\L \1/ \ \ \ 8 1 \40 i / 916.2 X I x202 \ I X 916.7 \ 2 \ 1 �� / \1/ \L \1/ 1 \ WET \1/ \1/ \L \1r \ / \ / \ / 1 \ / \ / \L X 91 s.4 \L \L \L\ \ / \1/ \1/ \ / -_- '--- \L \L \ / \ / \1/ \ \L \ / \�!F \ `/ 58 `I:"1 \L \L / \L \1/ / 2034 _ \ / I I It II X 916 3 1 ___________ \ ° 52' 10' WET F\1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \ \1/ \y \l i \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ ___- 1_ ----- \l. \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ / \\1/ \1/ \l. \1/ \1/ \ \ \1/ \1/ \1/ \� _ _ - m 1 w01 �\ "976, ". - ' " - I S >> S89° 'S4"E \1/ \1/ \L \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ ``` \ii .� ` \1/ \1/ \1/ \ \ - Wil/ - - i\l� \1/- ' -- \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ / \1/ 6,;4,-: 1 \1/ \1/ \1/ \ \1/ 1l/ \1/ � \l/ \1_ \ \1/ JJllll ll' 20\xWetland Covenant Area - / ��% 0 - - 0.000 I wE \ \- / SS" �� q�•2 Lot Car N89°58 54 W 251.28 -�---- lot Cor r, I ---"' per D No. 40 619 & 7620 - �,, F E 4/ \ \ \l/ \V •V\/ -- �"----- _ _--- \qs \�`/7 4\Q� - - \l/ I� 11/ \1/ 11/ 11/ �. \l� ---/ / �•Y�----------\1/ \1/ ; ' � \1/ ', �7 ;' / \1/ / \1/ \1/ \1/ \\ \1/ i4/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ ,\�i�i \1/ 11/ 2036 / \l. .1/ \1/ ; \l• I I w\ELT \1/ \1/ \1/------- -.l• \1/ \l/ .l• ,' \1/ \1/ .l• , / .l• \1/ \l• .l• \ \ \\�/ ; \1/ �.1/ .1/ \1/ \l• /.j' ; ^Q/ \jr \1/ \1/ \1/ � / `I/ WET \1/ \1/ ��/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \\ \1/1 \ \1/ I \1/ \1/ \1/ 7 \ 11/ A/ I ( \ \1/ i wW \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ Il \4/ \1/X s16.7 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \\\ \\1/ \1/ \\ \yl \1/ \1/ \1// 094 WR9 V % / o� \L \4/ \L \L \L 2011 I \1/ \1/ \1/\L \L \L \L \1/ \1/ \1/ \L / \1/ \1/ � wEr zo�6=� \/ \l \L \L 1 I / \ WVT 2038 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/) \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ // \1/ \\ 1 \1/ Q' \1/ I \1/ / 1 I * WET \1' ' * R C E L 4,' 1 9 0 31 2421 0 01 3 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ // \1/ \1/ i y 2092-- ET "" y \1/ \1/ 1r \ 2111 I \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \` _1\Jr \1/ X 916 g/ U P L D j �E'A O ro U I n 2039WET i ! / i \\ X WET WET /�X�x 2097 2111 / J \1/ \�/ I \ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ ,' \V \1/ I\1/ \1/ \1/ /�1/ \1/ \ji/ \1/ �w- �✓ WET\1/\ I r00 I WET L- WET 2100 N p -J 2041 \L \L \\ \L \1/ \\L� \�/ \L 11/ Er \L 11/ \1/ \L \L \1/ I I� W 1 \ 2-0 0 - ->; 2Q42 / / - 2046 _ _ 2 4 / I I / �J //y,.\y`\y M N Z XWET WET / E `_ WE ET `>z / '�� �' I 1 / \ �I D M Q /' � \1/ P\�i5.5 \1/\ \ I \1/ 11/ 4/ \1/ \\ \1/ �\J� A \1/ 11/ 11/ w � w U ----- -- - --- r - - - - - ----- -/- W -- � - J \ V� O 0 o / S89°'59'50"E 233.70 `_ _ _ xwET \\`� `L \1/ \L \1/ \1/ \1/ I \1/ \1/ 1 11/ \/ \/ \1/ \ \I/ \1/ \1/ \l/ \L 11/ _ / - , �'- �, 1 2099 \ / \ -------------�-- 1 \ a I WET \ 100 0 U cs o 11/ \1/ \1, \ln / / / \ ( I 4 / I \L ; \ Q) 11/ \L \L \1/ \1, \L \ \1/ \1/ \1/ \L \1/ \1/ \1/ \\ \L \1/ \L \1/ \1/ o - U zQ 2014 / / ,/ 1� I ET I \FL \ 1 \ �O W W W , 16 & / \1/ '0\\ z F I �ET%%V v� Q� v1% vjr v)r I I /// °9/� r I v1/ vL \\\\ �' v1/ v1/ v1/ vDr {; ` 915.6 v1/ v1/ v1/ v1/ v1/ \\ r°� v1/ v1/ v1/ vj� W o 1 / \ vvo /\ 201 1 \ \ X9164 \ ° I i N ^ \1/ \1/ \1/ 11/ / \1! � WET // \ �/�9� \�\ y \L \\ °\1/ y \1/ \j/ y y I `fl/� \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \ - \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ � \1/GJ / _/--------------- \ ' 1' \\� I O O �I \L % \'A, � 20 9 W T \ 0 \ 9� 916. �/ \ 2012 I 1 \1/ �p<\ �� \�/ \1/ Ir)'+. \1/ \1/\ \ \1/ \1/ /\1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ W WET � � \ 2� LO \4/ \l/ \1/ I \li`,` \1/ \l/ \1/ \1/ \l/ \l/ \\ \1/ \l/ \l/ \1, \1/ \1/ z \1/ /j I I cb I \ \1/ �"� \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ i \1/\\ \l/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \\1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ O ? 2011 L-_ �� 50 \ �xwETl �? �� _ 9 ET 20 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS \ \ \1/ \1/ \1/ \� \1/ i i I \\� '� \ x E \ \\\\/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \� \j/ \\\1/ / \1/ \1/ �\ I \1/ \1/ \\ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ _ I O \ 14/ w � I _ _ _ � - � 9 , \ � - - _ _ � \\ \'1 ' \ I � \1/ \1/ \1%, 7 \1 054`�- \\ FT 41cor 051WET \ i \ X 916.4 PERIMETER EROSION 1X20 --_\c\ 9s \�'`\l/ \l/ _ --- ���/`, .1/ \l/ \l/ \l/ \l/ \l/ .1/ .1/ S / I CONTROL AT I I 11 \ I \\ , \ --�-- 39 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS \I/, I \ I `------ ° 3'13"E 119. --✓\1\' \1/ N83 \1/ \4/ \\L \1%`. \1/ \L \L �/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 6• �. TYP. I I \ UPLANp AREA 1 / \_ /20 3 W� WE W 06 r',9\ /' w\1/ \y \1/ \1/ \1• \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ >� 20 5 ,\� X \� \\ 11/ 14// (0* 11/ \1/ 11/ 11/ Mainage &*tility Easl*ment WET r \ t \ w ��Q�II 65 \ 06 \1/ V/ \ / per Doc. No. 3519170 / \ / ri/ // \�� \ \�� \ \ \� `\ ,°yo / ,'' ,• p - 1 //i \ �\ �� \ \ \ \ E 213D 1z o x \ W7 INET / �� � �� \ \\\� \ ��� \ XI \ \Lot Cor \ / / / // / _\ \ \ \2 \ I WET X91 y.8 \ ////.\ \\���\�\\\\\9\\\\\\\-X 917.6 \\ , 2017 // /��\\\\\ \\\� \ \ \ I \ / E // / WEt 1/\\\ \ I� 006 I / / \ �\ \ "\\ \\ \\ -1 \ I I�L�2134 \L / \1' 1 \1/ \L WET / 111 / ' \ \ � `\\\ \\\ \ \\\ \ \ \ 1 J -� ET WET \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 0.000 --y------ 8(�---------yJ SMH 'I I I I II I I I II l �\ \ \ \ \ \ `� �� \ \\\\ \\\ \�\\\ ) > %917.3 i / i x wET \1/ \1/ \1/ 11/ \1/ \1/ \I I ( �/ , / // I Inv=904 3SE IIII ILII \\\\ \\\\ \� \\ \\\ ®\\j\�))\\//� )// / // / / O`J ,/ // , // /•i,/ I Inv --904.23 NW I \\ /// �� X 920.3 Ij l I II II \\\\ \\ 3� \� \ \\/i/��///� //// NOS' / / / /. rG, • \ \ \ /,' \ \ I I 1 I I \ \ \ \ \ \ ii /i / �/ / /// // \� 1� / I2 T_ \1/ \L \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ I /� / ,• / / / / G \ s2 \�� I CBR ?T s \ \ \\ I Rim=921.5 \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ 4 _\ NSI'�PION LIMIS I INV= ' 1SOS 1' \\o\ \1y -914.8 `1' \� \ \ \ \\ \ \ \ \ u/i / //� I \1/ \L \L \L \L \L \L /' / ,i 9' \\\\ // \//�/ /iI INSTALL REDUNDANT ,/ / , ", .a 6 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ / // / / // / / �/ / / / ,til. 1 \l. '� \ \ \ \ \ 2 \ \� \ // / ////% / / /// x/'24 \1/ ROW OF PERIMETER \1/ \1/ \l. 2003WET EROSION CONTROL ' // / // INV= 5 S �2.0 I 2 \1, \1/ \ \ \\ %�\ \� \ `^�\ / �j//� �/ j��2671 2072 / `1' ADJACENT TO ALL ,V \J/ \li \li \913.8 \1/ \1/ *9,, c 1 \\ \ \ \ \T/ , WATER BODIES AND / h II s �N \1/ AT y \ \ �7 \\ �\ \ \,--- / / / 1, ;0 70 \l/ \1/ \� �%FYl/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ ,' /'' , ' / / TC ---921 \ J \ �u T` WETLANDS /' G o \\ \\ \� a•,A 9 \\ \ < WE \ \��^�/ / / \ OCS INV= \, / �' �' � � �21 UPLAND AREA \2� N�Lc 22e..:a _ \ \\ \ \1' \ / �/ /'\ / / 915.7 VFT '- ` \\1! Rim=917.4 / 914.1 �' CBR 922. U c. \ - ' _- Rim=921.6 \ a oG 92 6 \\ 2\ �' \ 2J` Fr t / 917.2 I / �(W r9 \j/ \1/ \1/ 2107E WET \ \1/ \1/ /\1'/ Ul . / z \ on I BERM WET WET / nv=sla.4s \ / az 6 v v Setb / I = --- WET ' •� � \. �✓ 2 � `�------- pCk I i I , WET ,' i� - - _ ---_------ ' �°i� I M / ' / I �Q� 10 I2 2 \\ Line I I / P RIMETER ER `1' ,, j ' INET NSP\Transmissilen Line \1/ \v- WET J / J Easement / / / T �, I / ONTROL AT ;' ° O I c\ \ � •� � >> # � I I � \1/ \per Doc. A(o. 35375@1 i� 2108 IIS I CONSTRUCTION LIMITS,�,15 N , ----------------� s \ cG ION i \\\ \ \ l I, TY W \4/ / �WET \1/ \L \L \L 10 ` ````t'` 211T E1T/� WET/ A/\ i G \ /f 914.s cBR ' WE O / ND�POND , � o ' X106 _ `V / 9209 \\ 202 \ 918/0 �, RPR 91 �, 1 WET \l, \l, \l, \1/ NSP Tralxsmission.l�ine \1/x \ ,�', �, �, Inv --915.28 W //,�i �/'' �` O \' < - i,. - S c 921.8 \ \\ ® / / / �� CONS RUdlv4TS / w I Easement\�� `' '`// % / / .' . �, p� \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ peq/DOC. N o.\l3537562 \1/ / �11 s / , \1/ \1Ss / INV G 9' S H \ / / Z10 / 915.1 U\g / c 2i�, Rim g / 2067 WE,T I :y / WET .` / �, sMH rc, 224♦ \ \ 1 lnv,9 2o.sj�_wET \1' \1/ �;' X2122 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ i\ ' \yam, \1/ PARCEL ID: 1903121210014 Rim=921.9 g21g ♦ R 1s•ss 2102 _2103 e w� - _ '\, / / // ` /,� Address: 4790 ROSEMARY WAY NORTH nv=905.99 SE / - WET WET �G / _ �. �e _ Z�y �� > W _ mss" _ �, �, / ; .�,/ �, S�/' �, OWNER: CHRIST EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH INLET PROTECTION AT , 2 a rG=9209 s ps.e- _ /C- _ _ /2121 '' y/ I �A.®`y ,'Ua",o5 C 9% --�_---____ _ ,-_-f-- - WET CATCH BASINS, TYP og2 �O 0o g2p `\PVC U=gig 4 ' y7 8 __1 1 ___ ' \--z12�0�'s /./NP \1/ \1/ CBR '3 9 I TC=919.7 =919.6 2 _ +- -` \ 1 _ /.� E Rim=920.8 Gu=920. O 2a I O cu=919.2 15' RCP L=sls.s_ _ _ __920.. �� �� _ _ / / / R u \1/ \1/ Inv --917.27 TC=927. 5 LQ 19� a GU=919.3 rC=920.3- TG=920.4 o 3 p.... . %/ /' INV. I 911.8 i>\� N, R�9q , 911.7 I C=920,4 9,4 GU=819.4 I " 919 - �O\ // _ UC_920.o ¢t 0 \ 9978> / 1 / ^ i �I�I� g20Q ��_�-`]�1 919.7 ✓T 9. \T SMH 7C=919.8 L GU=919 �4� 1 I/=�z/�g,7 6 =g=9.6 GU=91�1�� 9--g,3-i�% -"__ 179.2 \¢e 1 Rim=920.1 , a� - / Inv -906.75 SE rc 919.8-.z c� 91g.e Inr-906.40 NW / J CBR _ 9201 R,� _� r Rim=918.9 �% r Inv --914.64 / / '� r \g SO• ` �c s 9s� 11% PARCEL ID: 1903121210016 C6- // /.� / / //'/ G 'gs '�� \ I I 000 Owner: LAKE AREA BANK / �/ / // /,/ RimCBR zs \ sisi c / V / , / , Rim=919.1 - V Inv -915.08 Rep ,, ,•/ / /' / // a T ADO /' / / j /,' / CBR c c� 9191 ,' /' /,/ Rim=918.8 zS,, c \\� / s1 9R Inr-914.86 Qco 91� V 19.2 90 INV= 911.6 \ \ ,/' ,•' /' i' LINV=\ \� 911.5 SWPPP NOTES: 1. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 2. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. 3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. CITY OF HUGO EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES. ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. LEGEND: -------- 1 I ---------- EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL --� DRAINAGE ARROW ■■■■��■■■■■■��■■■■■■ SILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMIT ■ ■ INLET PROTECTION I r41;,F&f- :0, 61w F40.1, 0, 0, STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 02 (/ 7-27z- z7z2A EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 0 fl I. 0 Know what's below. Call before you dig. Ag�l 1" = 50'-0" 25-0" 0 50'-0" 2/14/2019 4:59 PM clovo O te CM G3 ( M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 M I L L E P HANSON Cn FM z LU 2FM Q am a Nt M L0 O Q U) M N IZT W J LU Wz a z O/ 2 Wco a. LU LL Q LU J 0 J L0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SWPPP -EXISTING CONDITIONS swi 0 ■ Q COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. Frenchman Place 1st Add. 916.0 I 2024 — — — PARCEL ID: 1803121-340001 ADDRESS: 15040 EVERTON AVE N OWNER: ROSSINI STEVEN J SWPPP NOTES: 11/ ' .___\1/ \l, 11/� \1/ WET 91 8 \1/ 11/ \i/ l 707. 6 — — N87030'30"W 1196.83 9187 2088 1 -1 N. IN" I%" ." °„1"" - - I z3 _x2029 k2026 915.1 2079 WET 914.2 o S6 Q"W MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING 916,6 i / WET 2A30� WE 2028 7 WET \L 11/ \1/ 1 11' `1' `1' 920.3 918.0 , , \°p31 ANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. -- �' �' �' �'i 031 �' ET �' `� �7 `I' `1' `1' `l, \L \1/ zo8o \1/ 27g•kj - ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, /y \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ VET- —y_ 5 aIR 1A J \ �� \L 8, \L 918 0 \L , �• -------- 25 Rear Setback Line - 2oa1 zoa7 \\ ----------- ; s9 0.000 2 SEE SHEETS SW1 0 SW1 5 FOR S I I WET WE i - ` _ \1, \1/ 1l, \1, \1, 11, \1/ \1, \1, 4/ \1, \1, 11/ \1/ \l, \1/ 11, \1/ \j \ WET \L `\\ \l, \\l, \1/ \1, 11r \1/ \1/ 11, \1, i \l, / Il of Car D ESC R I PTI ON S, AND PRACTICES. / I - 2084 WETStJ\\ (fl a M /^07 \u2oz2 - _ �2oa3 w�XwET `?'Wens a`°/,� 3. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION /2032 _ Want e wET WET I WET WET \\ s \ ------ N 37 "-- p /_� CONTROL NOTES. tJ \ n Wetland Cove Area r Doc. \l, 1 \ o. 766 2 ----- - _ -- �, \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 11, --------11/ \1/ \1/ \1,----- \1/ \l, �' \1/ � \ \1/ \11ss. � ` y J ; \)i 3,1, ' ��i y � \1/ I - UPLAND AREA------------------- ---------- --------- ° \ 15 Y to' I ; --- xzoa9 sem\ \ --' - '`.°3�,r �` 4. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, D WET nl�TL INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. \l, \l, \l, I \L \L 1L \1/ \L I\ I ji \L ', V v \ \ \J \Ir \1/ \1/ \Ir \I/ \1/ 11/ \I/ \1/ \1/ 11, ,1/ \1/ \I/ \I/ \1/ ; ' 11, 11/ \I/ l `'.1r 11/ \b\ 11, 11/ WE F94 ND 11, 11, 11/ ''� � \I, `b ,;WET' WET3 A ss\,s, `; $6°°ca�-'' , ti� CITY OF HUGO EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 11, \1/ \1/ I4/ \L 1L 1L 1L \L ,\ \L \1/ \l, \1/ \I/ \V \l, \1/ \V 11, \1/ 11/ 11/ \1/ \1/ 11/ \1/ \l, \V \\ 1, � �1, a6 \ O \1/ I \L \L 1L °3� �L \1/ \L o I 06"-, N6A ' ^ ) \i, �, \;, WET \;/ \;/ \1/ \;, \l, \ \I/ \l, \;/ \;/ \l, �, �, \l, \l, \;, �, \l, \l, - ,�,- " - \l, \l, �, \/ \1/ \\\ \1/ \L \\\ t, \L 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES. wV �` 12o3a --------- 'WET--- \ F � � 58`1'"1 �+? I \ \\41- ---------- 1 \�` I � `. --------------- J 1 �ctr----- \�\L--------- — 2019 - -�- __--_------ � ��� \ wET \ / S �j0 S89�-8'54"E \ i4/0100100 \l,``, I \1/ \l. \1/Ln I 20 Wetland Covenant Area / OJ%�� 20 - — — — — Ln WA ET per D No. 40 7619 & 4V7620 / SSF��\ 4� Lot Cor N89058 54 W 251.28 lot Cor \l, 1l• 1l. M i \l/ 4/ \ 4/ \I/ \j/ 4/ \l/ \1/ / -- \�' \1/ �' \1, -= �i---------�, \l/ 4/ \1/ \l/ \l/ \1/ 1141003`5'di �036 "-----'1Lf`�� 7 '''--------------------------------- i � / ,y I * WW \1, \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1, \1/ \1/ \1, \1, \1/ \1/ I 2018 WET \L i 1 I /M \1/ i \ // i WW \1, \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 1 \L 1J/ \1/ \1/ \J/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 1 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 094 WEg�/ / �� \V \1/ 1 /o 2017 1 WET /=`kl, \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ WETf 1 i 2046 *2038 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ ; / T I I' y \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ y \1/ t, \1/ \1/ y \1/ 093 / \1/ \1/ y \1/ \1/ I WET , I* R C E L D� 19031 2 21 0013 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 1 \l, \1/, WE99� WET \1/ \l, \V \1/ \1/ I x20�� UPLAND AREA `/ \1/ J 11/ \1/ I 2016 \1, \1/ 11, \1/ \1/ \l, \l, 11r \1/ 11, A/ \1/ \l, NV \1/ \1/ 11 11, *b1 /1 \1/ 11/ 11/ \1/ \1/ \1/ O U I WET 120 9 i 1 11 WET - \fix 2097 WET / i WET _ 2133 WET I Q M \1/ 11/ 11/ \L \L \1, \L \L 1 \L \L \/ 1/ \/ \/ \li, \1/ 209G --V- \1/ WET\1/\ 2098 �, \L \1, \1, \L \L ,� n o 00 I ; 11 wET wET \2100 N o f � 11, U \L \L j 2 1 3 2041 \l/ 1L� xWE'f \L 11, \L \L,'� \1/ \1/ \L \L 11, \L \L \1/ \L \L \1/ 11 ET \L \L \l, \L \L 1L I I_ 0 - 2046 -- 2 4 1 i M N Z xWET WET ET `z ' i P1 \ N D M FT > --------- 20a� - � y y \l, 1 / y \\ y � �\1� A \l, \1/ \1/ w � w v L--- -------------------- - - 1 Vv = CD CC V NS89° 59' 50"E 233.70 x WET W \ y \1/ \1/ \1/ \l, \l, y \1/ j \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \\ \1/ \1/ \1/ \l, \l, \l, O ° cn = O - �, i 2099 \ p C) ------------------ \ A i WET \ I O = 14, \l, \1/ \l, ET \1/ ; \\�� \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ { \l, \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \\ \1/ \1/ \1/ \l, \1/ oo o Q oT O�Gp \\\ D i \\ � LLJ � � \ �ly� 11, \l, \1/ \l! \1/ 11/ \1/ \l, \l, \L� Z \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ DE z v L�7 v �ETL I A Q�� lop V " °6rr 1L 1L \L o 2013 11, \L \L 1L \l, \L \ \L 1L \L \L -, \1/ SET �j�"9 \ \1/ \1/ \\ O \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 11/ \1/ `,1/t N --------------- LOT W T �- O\ i � `� 1•P cn 11, \ 2 12 11/ 9 \ O,� r 1,, Q) \V ET I I L\1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ 11 \1/�\` \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \ \1/ \1/ I w \ t)U dr \1/ \1/ \1/ 1 \1/ o X/011 20 \CONSTRUCTION LIMITS H h WETON I v1/ � � �' II � i 3'i` a•y `�'b I � C v Av1/ vlr v1/ v1/ �i vjr `� vjr v1/ v1/ v1/ v1/ AV v1/ v1/ v1/ vL s I s7l• a} 'y \ �\ i � \1/ \l \1/ 11/ \1A \1/ D I 054 T Eoh�w 1, ' \1,vvPERIMETER EROSION � \ J `•/ CONTROL AT I' \ v!r vL vL vL r vl, vL vL vl,SS CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, 11/ I _ �, �,- N83° 3'13"E 119.39 \\ ,r �.�'03 \1/ \1/ \\1/ 11/. \1/ \1/ \1/ �, \1/ \1/ 11, 11/ \1/ TYP. *2 Ig ® ® - \06 - _ ,S• \ \ rr . �'S,� / �, , i \1/ � W p� 01a� 9� � � \l� \�r a\\ \1/ \ I, °,\ y `41 \1/ `1'Mainage &*tility Eas*ment - `1' /�) �� E �O a 06 v )���tiv �9\w1/ vl�r pS vL \J/ \4/ \J/ per Doc. No. 3519170 V 20(l ® 7-�—< ! , °'yam 115 --- IN LL ADDITIONAL\l� �av \1/ \l, 11, 11, \1/ \1/ 11/ \l, \l, 11/ ` 0.000 r/' ,'' / r / /. ice/ 92 I� ROW OF SALT-FENCEr '78 Lot Cor ® T %IV \L \L 1L \1/ \1/ 11/ \1/ \1/ I I' AROUND FILTRATlOPI / \1, BASIN ONCE r \1/ \i/ \1, \1/ \1/ \i/ \i/ INLET PROTECTION AT 2E07 i INLET PROTECTION AT - 14 CONSTRUCtTF,b ,1g'�� , // / --�'`----- ;CATCH BASINS, TYP ♦/ / CATCH BASINS, TYP -I i v �l \1r 11r 11r \1/ 11r 11/\1/ 6loo1/''41 ' ,,' I ® - I i 2134 1 / /• \L "00,\1/ 1 \1/ E 6 �3 I / x WET \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ �,, m s / Tea6� wo Lot CarSM , --\L------- 8(�---------\1/ R mH 921.8 S1 ® ® n eel WET \1/ \1/ \1/ 11, 11/ \1/ \11 11/ C \� //' / �. // �g I nv=904.43 SE 921.5 9'18 \l, \L I nvW904.23 NW OTC=921.1' ., . 000 \ �cp z0 \G0 900 6 � �� I C R\wE V �75 vlr vL vlr vlr \4/v!r 1L \4/ ,� Rim=921.5 / / / 92os �� Q� � CONSITfi�t1ION LIMITS v :. / � ,rr �'� / av 92 , �� ` 914.8 \�' INf•TALL REDUNDANT \1/ %4/ %4/ .1, 11. \t, \1/ \�>9 0.9 �ry�6 9Sr ,, \ \l/` 11/ \l/ j ' 74\1, ROW OF PERIMETER 1V \l, 11/ 1l/ \l, \l/ 1l/ 1l/ /'r/ ' r ,�,E /� / L ,� WE EROSION EROSION CONTROL INV= i..... \ d� 5�z ADJACENT TO ALL 11/ \l, \l, \1/ \1/ \913.8 Gu=921.2 ��sz1.5 s �I/ /,� /- rrwET/� WATER BODIES AND ,.� �z / / INLET P TECTION AT � � � � �" ' 6 y EA de �I, INLEf/PROTEL�`TION AT WETLANDS vz�i/ 11/ \l, 11/ 11/ 2113 \1/ 11/ 11/ /. CATCH BA S, TYP �_ 9wEFi ° - CATCH BASINS, TYP ocs -"WET INv=.' , /z \Lc ��a �' �� 3V' �_ UPLAND AREA _� �� Rim=917.4, �i�914.1 �' �'/'� , r, CBR ' 922.'�II^Ca TC\ I - 2112 Rim=921.6 \ I \�\ I \c�\ 922 , a - 9 1�' 1 / _ y5' c .z ^ "' .- �_.,. BERM --_ WET ` 2114 �/ Inv --918.46 Z10/ -— - - --- ------ WET INLET R- I CATCF INV=__/ 915.1 ON�� 2. �9 9 \ S SI TcoU\9z'. s`li Rim=921.9 92j y nv=905.99 SE ^'15 I C W INLET PROTECTION ATS Ir' CATCH BASINS, TYP CBR Rim=920.8 Inv=917.27 3T 3 VQ 92q\ GU,92p5 R rC'927,0 SI C/ 7 - 9 1,,906.,1 5 SE nv=90640 NN PARCEL ID:1903121210016 Owner: LAKE AREA BANK ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. 11 W PERIMETER EROSION `I' -- - % ' /lvET NSP\Transmissilan Line N a- WET 1 CONTROL AT Easement ,%� / / O T I X z o1 a \per Doc. Re. 35375$11 CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, WET / 2 W W \1/ \1/ \1, \1/ \\1/ ` �.` / 2118 211 B' \1✓ WET W 9TYP cBR a,o� WETLAND/POND 10 T �WET.,, I Rim=919.0 WET \1, Inv=915.28 W `1' \l, \1/ \1/ NSP Tralasmissionkine CONS RUCiv�I4TS 2 / / w Easement k, ��� `�j'� STALLADDI �IALm I� `1' peq/Doc. No.\1353756211./; ,'�1zi, \1/11, LEGEND: 2067 2 0 IYf F9NCE *2122 \1/ \1/ \1/ \1/ \1, \1/ ; .�� �/' 1/W1/ `,� �,�/ \l� PARCEL ID: 1 9031 21 21 001 4 *wET `1' OVWOF S2�p3 VvEhLTA�ATION�cP� - - - �ti './' z ' ' / Address. 4790 ROSEMARY WAY NORTH WET - la W - _ \y \1, / ' ,' \l, S`,�,/' \l, OWNER: CHRIST EVANGELICAL LUTHERAN CHURCH -------- ------ EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL p_6 B IN ONCE' / — X2121 , ,/ c=920 9200 - ' 20 WET ,v' / , I 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL _ \I/ / .920.0. �--�_�� 1 U=919.7 =s1s.s - -- __ ,'' ,' ' ��� DRAINAGE ARROW _ IS" TC �s ' / GU 919.2 RCP L GU=919.3 920.5 a O_ 20.3 ' �``/ \1/ \1/ INV= rc=920.3 ' . iC=9204 0" - �/ / INV= /--�- - m 911.8 911.7 GU=9199 - / RBR sll•7 ■������������������■ SILT FENCE/BIOROLL GRADING LIMIT iC=920.4 GU= 919.4 I .�. 9�9 =— __ _ �� _ _ /' a` =920.0 ¢e /rya �9j8 9200 ��_�'1/ , GU=919.79)�r 7 _ TC=919.8 L =919.s —-9,�-9�: 2 \ '9 ■■ INLET PROTECTION TC=919.8 GU -919.9 / / g\9' j 7 � —� TC=920.2 U_91, 6 _9196 Ar�,99 RA3•( Z '3 TT %SNIP TC=2/4 ', OCBR C=920.1Rim=918.9 In=914.64 117 STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE s 000 CBR \ 2 979. Rim=919.1 \ Ig.'R \V — Cp rc''9s ti v 9919. I—T C z, BR ccs �/_ L L —. /Z— z i Rim=918.8 zsR X09 os v °999xEROSION CONTROL BLANKET ,' Inv=914.86 `\\Cp ? ^ .2 0 / / / / / • //' \ C4 T \ / �\ 0 0 INV=-/ 911.6 \ �INv==\ \ \ Know what's below. 1" = 50'-0" /�/' 911.5 �\ \ Cal I before you dig. , 25'-0" 0 50'-0" 2/14/2019 4:59 PM clovo �Hsot�� R �� CM G3 ( M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 M I L L E P HANSON Cn FM z UU M N Lr) Ln Z z z_j W C a O am O W a WZ a5`z O Q W ''^i vJ �j a W LL Q W J W U)0 z O J UU co(nti �0U LU) O C,� a_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS swi ■ Q COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. WOODEN LATH SHALL BE NAILED SECURELY TO THE POST MEMBER TO SECURE FILTER FABRIC. 2" X 4" X 2.5' LONG WOOD POSTS, 8 REQ'D. NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT SILT BOX TO FIT AROUND THE INLET STRUCTURE WITH 6" MINIMUM CLEARANCE TO EDGES OF STRUCTURE. SILT BOX TO BE PLACED ON AN EVEN SURFACE 6" BELOW STRUCTURE OPENING. TOP OF SILT BOX TO EXTEND 18" MINIMUM ABOVE EXISTING GRADE. 2" X 4" HORIZONTAL MEMBERS CONTINUOUS AROUND TOP AND BOTTOM. F=ASTENED TO EACH POST USING 2-20D COMMON NAILS MONOFILAMENT GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AS PER MNDOT TABLE 3886-1 (MACHINE SLICED). ADDITIONAL 8-10" OF FABRIC FLAP AT BOTTOM OF BOX 8-1.0" FABRIC FLAP EXTENDING BEYOND BOTTOM 2"x4" - BURY UNDER ROCK TO PREVENT UNDERWASHING 1 1/2" WASHED ROCK 1' DEEP X V WIDE �t CITY of INLET PROTECTION Special Details Date: GO SILT BOX FOR 01-20-17 BEEHIVE CASTING Revised HU—EC-6 \ EST. 1906 / PROPOSED PLAN <�_-- = DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW 8-12" MINIMUM DEPTH 1 1/2" WASHED GRAVEL FILTER CITY of INLET PROTECTION Special Details ROCK FILTER FOR CATCH Date 01-20-17 BASIN DURING ROAD Revised HU—EC-7 jR Esr.1906 CONSTRUCTION EXISTING GROUND SURFACE 00 ILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED LLER AS SPECIFIED FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH 2" OF DIRT OR COMPOST TO EMBED ROLL. DIRECTION OF FLOW WOODEN STAKES 1/2"X2"X16" MIN. PLACED 10' O.C. WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ON PVMT. PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP AT MIN. 10'0.C. NOTE: 1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BIO ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL. 2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60%D-70% PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER MNDOT SPEC 3897. 3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 3/811 . 4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12" AT ENDS AND STAKE. 5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION. 'C' SEDIMENT BIO -ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOG NTS 'B' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROM TRENCH Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 0 Y Y rYY '�YrY � I � OVERLAP: BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A' AND'B'. OVERLAP END OF YYY TOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE. .Y EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SILT TRENCH AND TAMPED. DOUBLEROW OF STAPLES. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. EROSION BLANKET 'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4" OR MORE IN DEPTH NOTE: 1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED SOIL. TYPICAL STAPLE #8 GAUGE WIRE O O O hR R� C� G3 O M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-515-0060 MWF properties MILLER HANSON a r c h i t e c t s Nt M � I _ L0 W O I.L W 2 a > O Q LL cw M N IZT L0 Ln J O LU Z_ 2 C LU LU J J L0 QO ti I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION SWPPP - DETAILS "'= I SW1 02 2/14/2019 4:59 PM 1 0 COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. INSTALLATION WIRE FENCING POST 1) SET POSTS AND 2) STAPLE THE EXCAVATE A6"X6" SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG AND INLET PROTECTION BAG WIRE MESH TRENCH UPSLOPE FENCING TO DEFLECTOR PLATE ALONG THE LINE EACH POST TRENCH OF THE POSTS OVERFLOW 1 -CENTER OF FILTER ASSEMBLY 6"X6" _ STORM SEWER OVERFLOW IIIII IIIII IIIII=11111= 1101=411111L==IIIII=IIIII= OVERFLOW 2 - TOP OF CURB BOX GRATE WITH GAP IIIII=IIIII 01111=IIIII=IIIII IIIII=IIIII INLET 11111- =11111- =-11111 10" FILTER ASSEMBLY CURB AND GUTTER PROTECTION BAG III =11111 =11111 IIIII INLET IIBACKFILL I 3) ATTACH THE FILTER 4) THE II FILTER FABRIC FABRIC TO THE TRENCH AND 50FL �I I WIRE FENCING AND COMPACT THE CURB O OPO S O�RFC/ljy�/til THE TRENCH COMPACTED EXCAVATED SOIL BACKFILL �,P� �\G � PCO &k yFN�"FFR .�.• P IIIII IIIII =IIIII=IIIII= IIIII=11111 ==11111=11111= ' —IIIII=11111 111111=11111 —11111—IIIII 11111 IIIII —IIIII— ` .p II III ==11111 =IIIII—Ll-11111 =11111 11111 =11111 IIIII . . . a' . a •p i LIFFTING • °.'� I I STRAPS ' . o I I BOTTOM ?) CG 23 HIGH-FLOW CURB 2" WASHEDCOARSE OF DRAINAGE WAY LL HIGH-FLOW FABRIC FILTER REGATE A�\�\�v� 2 LOW PROFILE WITH B O A A GUTTER FOR SAFETY 11 AND CURB APPEAL 6" MIN. DEPTH ELEVATION: POINTS "A" SHOULD E HIGHER THAN POINTSBB" NO SCALE B"INLET PROTECTION BAG DETAIL MAINTENANCE 4. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER NOTES: 1. FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER BARRIER IS NO LONGER 1. THE ROAD DRAIN -CURB & GUTTER MODEL CONSISTS OF A REUSABLE OPEN TOPPED RECEPTACLE THAT SETS BAG TO BE HELD IN AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING REQUIRED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH INSIDE THE STORM SEWER GRATE. AN INCORPORATION REAR DEFLECTOR PLATE IS CONNECTED TO THE PLACE BY EXISTING PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED. RECEPTACLE DIRECTING THE WATER INTO THE BASIN FOR FILTRATION. SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 5. WETLANDS ARE TO BE PROTECTED BY TWO ROWS OF 2. THE ROAD DRAIN -CURB & GUTTER MODEL HAS A REPLACEABLE FILTER CARTRIDGE. GRATE 141�FROM NOTES: 2. SHOULD THE FABRIC DECOMPOSE OR BECOME H.D. SILT FENCE. DOUBLE H.D. SILT FENCE IS 3. THE FILTER MEDIA SHALL MEET ALL LOCAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR INLET PROTECTION. FRONT, BACK AND 1. CRUSHED CONCRETE IS NOT ALLOWED INEFFECTIVE PRIOR TO THE END OF THE EXPECTED REQUIRED AROUND WATER BODIES, STEEP SLOPES, BOTTOM TO BE MADE 2. CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 24'X 50' USEABLE LIFE AND THE BARRIER STILL BE NECESSARY, AND HIGHLY ERODIBLE SOILS. MAINTENANCE: SINGLE PIECE OF 3. GEOTEXTILE FABRIC REQUIRED UNDERNEATH COARSE AGGREGATE THE FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY. 1. CHECK FILTER MEDIA AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. CLEAN OR REPLACE IF SEDIMENT CLOGS FILTER. 4. MAINTENANCE IS INCIDENTAL 3. SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER 2. REMOVE SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM THE RECEPTACLE AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. FABRIC EACH STORM EVENT. THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY 1/2 THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER. CITY o� 1WG0ENTRANCE ROCK CONSTRUCTION Special Details Date: 04-01-15 Revised HU—EC-1 � �t CITY OF FWm PLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF A SILT FENCE Special Details Date: 04-01-15 Revised: HU—EC-2 > (-ITY of HUGO WIMCO CURB & GUTTER INLET PROTECTION (CG23) Special Details Date: 04-01-15 Revisetl: HU—EC-4 CITY o� 1WEST. INLET PROTECTION Special Details Date: 01-20-17 Revised: HU—EC-5 Es r. 1906 01-20-17 01-20-17 —� EST. lsots 01 —20-17 1906 WOODEN LATH SHALL BE NAILED SECURELY TO THE POST MEMBER TO SECURE FILTER FABRIC. 2" X 4" X 2.5' LONG WOOD POSTS, 8 REQ'D. NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL CONSTRUCT SILT BOX TO FIT AROUND THE INLET STRUCTURE WITH 6" MINIMUM CLEARANCE TO EDGES OF STRUCTURE. SILT BOX TO BE PLACED ON AN EVEN SURFACE 6" BELOW STRUCTURE OPENING. TOP OF SILT BOX TO EXTEND 18" MINIMUM ABOVE EXISTING GRADE. 2" X 4" HORIZONTAL MEMBERS CONTINUOUS AROUND TOP AND BOTTOM. F=ASTENED TO EACH POST USING 2-20D COMMON NAILS MONOFILAMENT GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AS PER MNDOT TABLE 3886-1 (MACHINE SLICED). ADDITIONAL 8-10" OF FABRIC FLAP AT BOTTOM OF BOX 8-1.0" FABRIC FLAP EXTENDING BEYOND BOTTOM 2"x4" - BURY UNDER ROCK TO PREVENT UNDERWASHING 1 1/2" WASHED ROCK 1' DEEP X V WIDE �t CITY of INLET PROTECTION Special Details Date: GO SILT BOX FOR 01-20-17 BEEHIVE CASTING Revised HU—EC-6 \ EST. 1906 / PROPOSED PLAN <�_-- = DIRECTION OF SURFACE FLOW 8-12" MINIMUM DEPTH 1 1/2" WASHED GRAVEL FILTER CITY of INLET PROTECTION Special Details ROCK FILTER FOR CATCH Date 01-20-17 BASIN DURING ROAD Revised HU—EC-7 jR Esr.1906 CONSTRUCTION EXISTING GROUND SURFACE 00 ILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED LLER AS SPECIFIED FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH 2" OF DIRT OR COMPOST TO EMBED ROLL. DIRECTION OF FLOW WOODEN STAKES 1/2"X2"X16" MIN. PLACED 10' O.C. WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ON PVMT. PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP AT MIN. 10'0.C. NOTE: 1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BIO ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL. 2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60%D-70% PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER MNDOT SPEC 3897. 3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 3/811 . 4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12" AT ENDS AND STAKE. 5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION. 'C' SEDIMENT BIO -ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOG NTS 'B' TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROM TRENCH Y Y Y Y Y Y Y 0 Y Y rYY '�YrY � I � OVERLAP: BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A' AND'B'. OVERLAP END OF YYY TOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE. .Y EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SILT TRENCH AND TAMPED. DOUBLEROW OF STAPLES. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. EROSION BLANKET 'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4" OR MORE IN DEPTH NOTE: 1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED SOIL. TYPICAL STAPLE #8 GAUGE WIRE O O O hR R� C� G3 O M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-515-0060 MWF properties MILLER HANSON a r c h i t e c t s Nt M � I _ L0 W O I.L W 2 a > O Q LL cw M N IZT L0 Ln J O LU Z_ 2 C LU LU J J L0 QO ti I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION SWPPP - DETAILS "'= I SW1 02 2/14/2019 4:59 PM 1 0 COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHO IMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATED AUGUST 1, 2018 # MNR100001) AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS SWPPP THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOW LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT. THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE 3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS. 4. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL 5. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (SECTION 14) 6. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE 7. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL 8. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE 9. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES 10. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES 11. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S 12. INSTALL STREET SECTION 13. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER 14. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS 15. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH 16. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND 17. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.) 18. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. RECORDS RETENTION: THE SWPPP (ORIGINAL OR COPIES) INCLUDING, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS. ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE (3) YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN SECTION 4. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT. 1. THE FINAL SWPPP; 2. ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT; 3. RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE SECTION 11, INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE); 4. ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE; AND 5. ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS, SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAINING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OR AS SOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE: 4.1. NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PER SECTION 21 OF THE PERMIT. 4.2. DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING. 4.3. CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING. 5. FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNER IS EXPECTED TO FURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (0 & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS SWPPP AMENDMENTS (SECTION 6): 1. ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.A OR ITEM 21.2.8 OR ANOTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL MUST COMPLETE ALL SWPPP CHANGES. CHANGES INVOLVING THE USE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP MUST INCLUDE A JUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOW THE REPLACEMENT BMP IS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS. 2. PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVING A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER. 3. PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BY THE SITE OWNER OR OPERATOR, USEPA OR MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE IN ELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER OR THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES (E.G., NUISANCE CONDITIONS AS DEFINED IN MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE OBJECTIVES OF A USEPA APPROVED TMDL. BMP SELECTION AND INSTALLATION (SECTION 7): 1. PERMITTEES MUST SELECT, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN THE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP AND IN THIS PERMIT IN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTIONAL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES. EROSION PREVENTION (SECTION 8): 1. BEFORE WORK BEGINS, PERMITTEES MUST DELINEATE THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED. 2. PERMITTEES MUST MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR DISTURBANCE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT WITH STEEP SLOPES. WHEN STEEP SLOPES MUST BE DISTURBED, PERMITTEES MUST USE TECHNIQUES SUCH AS PHASING AND STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNED FOR STEEP SLOPES (E.G., SLOPE DRAINING AND TERRACING). 3. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, INCLUDING STOCKPILES. STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 14 CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) BUT PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE. 4. FOR PUBLIC WATERS THAT THE MINNESOTA DNR HAS PROMULGATED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURING SPECIFIED FISH SPAWNING TIME FRAMES, PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE WATER'S EDGE, AND THAT DRAIN TO THESE WATERS, WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING THE RESTRICTION PERIOD. 5. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF THE LAST 200 LINEAR FEET OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES OR SWALES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF REMAINING PORTIONS OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. 6. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DURING CONSTRUCTION (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK -DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES, ETC.) DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THESE AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THEIR USE AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM CEASES 7. PERMITTEES MUST NOT USE MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES WITHIN ANY PORTION OF THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE SECTION WITH A CONTINUOUS SLOPE OF GREATER THAN 2 PERCENT. 8. PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT ALL PIPE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER OR PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. 9. PERMITTEES MUST NOT DISTURB MORE LAND (I.E., PHASING) THAN CAN BE EFFECTIVELY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 11. SEDIMENT CONTROL (SECTION 9): 1. PERMITTEES MUST ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERS OF THE SITE AND DOWNGRADIENT AREAS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO ANY SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN AND MUST KEEP THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES IN PLACE UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER. 2. IF DOWNGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED, BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OR EXCESSIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND AMEND THE SWPPP TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN ITEM 6.3. 3. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK -CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. 4. A FLOATING SILT CURTAIN PLACED IN THE WATER IS NOT A SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP TO SATISFY ITEM 9.2 EXCEPT WHEN WORKING ON A SHORELINE OR BELOW THE WATERLINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT TERM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G., INSTALLATION OF RIP RAP ALONG THE SHORELINE) IN THAT AREA IS COMPLETE, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL AN UPLAND PERIMETER CONTROL PRACTICE IF EXPOSED SOILS STILL DRAIN TO A SURFACE WATER. 5. PERMITTEES MUST RE -INSTALL ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES, IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. PERMITTEES MUST RE -INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. 6. PERMITTEES MUST PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS USING APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER ON ALL AREAS WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET. 7. PERMITTEES MAY REMOVE INLET PROTECTION FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (E.G. STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) IS IDENTIFIED BY THE PERMITTEES OR THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G., CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER). PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE NEED FOR REMOVAL IN THE SWPPP. 8. PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF STOCKPILES ON THE DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER. 9. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE STOCKPILES OUTSIDE OF NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. 10. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING BMP TO MINIMIZE THE TRACK OUT OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR ONTO PAVED ROADS WITHIN THE SITE. 11. PERMITTEES MUST USE STREET SWEEPING IF VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO THE STREET. 12. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14. 13. IN ANY AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE FINAL VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION WILL OCCUR, PERMITTEES MUST RESTRICT VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT USE TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. 14. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 15. PERMITTEES MUST DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 16. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR, IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE ON THE SITE, PROVIDE REDUNDANT (DOUBLE) PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTH DISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT LEAST 5 FEET APART UNLESS LIMITED BY LACK OF AVAILABLE SPACE. NATURAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED ADJACENT TO ROAD DITCHES, JUDICIAL DITCHES, COUNTY DITCHES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, AND SEDIMENT BASINS. IF PRESERVING THE BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE REASONS IN THE SWPPP. SHEET PILING IS A REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROL IF INSTALLED IN A MANNER THAT RETAINS ALL STORMWATER. 17. PERMITTEES MUST USE POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER. THE PERMITTEES MUST USE CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO CHEMICAL ADDITION AND MUST DIRECT TREATED STORMWATER TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR FILTRATION OR SETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (SECTION 10): 1. PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT -LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MAY DEWATER TO SURFACE WATERS IF THEY VISUALLY CHECK TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND NUISANCE CONDITIONS (SEE MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) WILL NOT RESULT FROM THE DISCHARGE. IF PERMITTEES CANNOT DISCHARGE THE WATER TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING A SURFACE WATER, PERMITTEES MUST TREAT IT WITH APPROPRIATE BMPS SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE SURFACE WATER OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES. 2. IF PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE WATER CONTAINING OIL OR GREASE, THEY MUST USE AN OIL -WATER SEPARATOR OR SUITABLE FILTRATION DEVICE (E.G., CARTRIDGE FILTERS, ABSORBENTS PADS) PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. 3. PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN -DRAINING ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION OR SCOUR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS OR INUNDATION OF WETLANDS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS THAT CAUSES SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND. 4. IF PERMITTEES USE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THEY MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURN THE BACKWASH WATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SECTION 11): 1. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE A TRAINED PERSON, AS IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 21.2.6, WILL INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH IN 24 HOURS. 2. PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT BMPS. 3. PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS. PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY UNLESS ANOTHER TIME FRAME IS SPECIFIED IN ITEM 11.5 OR 11.6. PERMITTEES MAY TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME IF FIELD CONDITIONS PREVENT ACCESS TO THE AREA. 4. DURING EACH INSPECTION, PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS BUT NOT CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITION. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. PERMITTEES MUST USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ACCESS. IF PRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF OBTAINING ACCESS. PERMITTEES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLE PERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK IN SURFACE WATERS. 5. PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FOR SEDIMENTATION FROM EROSION OR TRACKED SEDIMENT FROM VEHICLES. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM ALL PAVED SURFACES WITHIN ONE (1) CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY OR, IF APPLICABLE, WITHIN A SHORTER TIME TO AVOID A SAFETY HAZARD TO USERS OF PUBLIC STREETS. 6. PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. 7. PERMITTEES MUST DRAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND REMOVE THE SEDIMENT WHEN THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME. 8. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THAT AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT ON THE SITE (OR AVAILABLE TO THE PROJECT SITE IN THREE (3) CALENDAR DAYS) IS TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.B. 9. PERMITTEES MAY ADJUST THE INSPECTION SCHEDULE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 11.2 AS FOLLOWS: a. INSPECTIONS OF AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH, EVEN IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUES ON OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE; OR b. WHERE SITES HAVE PERMANENT COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING ANYWHERE ON THE SITE, INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH AND, AFTER 12 MONTHS, MAY BE SUSPENDED COMPLETELY UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY RESUMES. THE MPCA MAY REQUIRE INSPECTIONS TO RESUME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT; OR c. WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, INSPECTIONS MAY BE SUSPENDED. INSPECTIONS MUST RESUME WITHIN 24 HOURS OF RUNOFF OCCURRING, OR UPON RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 10. PERMITTEES MUST RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEING CONDUCTED AND THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. THESE RECORDS MUST INCLUDE: a. DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; AND b. NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; AND c. ACCURATE FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE NEEDED; AND d. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES); AND e. DATE OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALL FOR EACH EVENT. PERMITTEES MUST OBTAIN RAINFALL AMOUNTS BY EITHER A PROPERLY MAINTAINED RAIN GAUGE INSTALLED ONSITE, A WEATHER STATION THAT IS WITHIN ONE (1) MILE OF YOUR LOCATION, OR A WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES SITE SPECIFIC RAINFALL DATA FROM RADAR SUMMARIES; AND f. IF PERMITTEES OBSERVE A DISCHARGE DURING THE INSPECTION, THEY MUST RECORD AND SHOULD PHOTOGRAPH AND DESCRIBE THE LOCATION OF THE DISCHARGE (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, SETTLED OR SUSPENDED SOLIDS, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHER OBVIOUS INDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS); AND g. ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION MUST BE DOCUMENTED AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 6 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (SECTION 12): 1. PERMITTEES MUST PLACE BUILDING PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. PERMITTEES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COVER OR PROTECT PRODUCTS WHICH ARE EITHER NOT A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TO STORMWATER OR ARE DESIGNED TO BE EXPOSED TO STORMWATER. 2. PERMITTEES MUST PLACE PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. 3. PERMITTEES MUST STORE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE, (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) IN SEALED CONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7045 INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AS APPLICABLE. 4. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7035. 5. PERMITTEES MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKED OVER. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7041. 6. PERMITTEES MUST TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED INCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. PERMITTEES MUST REPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. 115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UP MEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE. 7. PERMITTEES MUST LIMIT VEHICLE EXTERIOR WASHING AND EQUIPMENT TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. PERMITTEES MUST CONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND MUST DISPOSE WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY PROPERLY. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS, OR SOLVENTS. 8. PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS (E.G., CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PERMITTEES MUST PREVENT LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES FROM CONTACTING THE GROUND AND MUST DESIGN THE CONTAINMENT SO IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA RULES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A SIGN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY. PERMIT TERMINATION (SECTION 4 AND SECTION 13): 1. PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ALL TERMINATION CONDITIONS LISTED IN SECTION 13 ARE COMPLETE. 2. PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER SELLING OR OTHERWISE LEGALLY TRANSFERRING THE ENTIRE SITE, INCLUDING PERMIT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ROADS (E.G., STREET SWEEPING) AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINAL CLEAN OUT, OR TRANSFERRING PORTIONS OF A SITE TO ANOTHER PARTY. THE PERMITTEES' COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT TERMINATES AT MIDNIGHT ON THE SUBMISSION DATE OF THE NOT. 3. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MUST INSTALL PERMANENT COVER OVER ALL AREAS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. VEGETATIVE COVER MUST CONSIST OF A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATION WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATES NO VEGETATION, SUCH AS IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR THE BASE OF A SAND FILTER. 4. PERMITTEES MUST CLEAN THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND MUST ENSURE THE SYSTEM MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 15 THROUGH 19 AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED. 5. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. 6. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. PERMITTEES MAY LEAVE BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON-SITE IN PLACE. 7. FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ONLY, PERMIT COVERAGE TERMINATES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IF THE STRUCTURES ARE FINISHED AND TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL IS COMPLETE, THE RESIDENCE SELLS TO THE HOMEOWNER, AND THE PERMITTEE DISTRIBUTES THE MPCA'S "HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET" TO THE HOMEOWNER. 8. FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (E.G., PIPELINES ACROSS CROPLAND), PERMITTEES MUST RETURN THE DISTURBED LAND TO ITS PRECONSTRUCTION AGRICULTURAL USE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. SEED NOTES: ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS: THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SALVAGE AND PRESERVE EXISTING TOPSOIL NECESSARY FOR FINAL STABILIZATION AND TO ALSO MINIMIZE COMPACTION IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDING THE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET. SEED • TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111 (OATS COVER CROP) FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEED MIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT A SEEDING RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE. MULCH • IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE SEED GERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90% COVERAGE (2 TONS PER ACRE OF STRAW MULCH) SLOPES • 3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH • SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. • SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS. TRAINING SECTION 21 DESIGN ENGINEER: MATTHEW R. PAVEK P.E. TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPP TRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA INSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMAN DATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 5/15/2011 - 5/16/2011 TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12 RE -CERTIFICATION: 3/16/2017 (8 HOURS), EXP. 5/31/2020 AREAS AND QUANTITIES: SITE AREA CALCULATIONS BUILDING COVERAGE ALL PAVEMENTS ALL NON -PAVEMENTS TOTAL SITE AREA IMPERVIOUS SURFACE EXISTING CONDITION PROPOSED CONDITION DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) EXISTING CONDITION 0 SF 0.0% 0 SF 0.0% 790,532 SF 100.0% 790,532 SF 100.0% 0 SF 0.0% 47,972 SF 6.1% 47,972 SF 6.1% EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES DISTURBED AREA 123,132 SF 2.83 AC SILT FENCE/BIO-ROLL ±1500 LF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 0 SF INLET PROTECTION DEVICES ±10 EA OWNER INFORMATION OWNER: MWF PROPERTIES 7545 LYNDALE AVE S MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55423 CONTACT: 612-243-4636 PROPOSED CONDITION 20,494 SF 2.6% 27,478 SF 3.5% 742,560 SF 93.9% 790,532 SF 100.0% NOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACT QUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. SWPPP CONTACT PERSON CONTRACTOR: SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING: ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY A PERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT. TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPP PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THE PROPERTY OWNER IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM. SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER): CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE OVERALL SWPPP PACKAGE ATTACHMENT A. CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE - SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT ATTACHMENT B. CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST ATTACHMENT C. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ATTACHMENT D: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. ATTACHMENT E: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES: THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES IN THE NPDES PERMIT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. PROJECT NARRATIVE: PROJECT IS A REDEVELOPMENT OF AN EXISTING VACANT LOT INTO A NEW APARTMENT COMPLEX. SITE AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL OCCUR. NATIVE BUFFER NARRATIVE: PRESERVING A 50 FEET NATURAL BUFFER AROUND WATER BODIES IS NOT PROVIDED IN THESE PLANS DUE TO GRADING REQUIRED ADJACENT TO THE EXISTING WATER BODY. REDUNDANT PERIMETER EROSION CONTROL WILL BE PROVIDED WHEN A SURFACE WATER BODY IS LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECTS DISTURBANCE. INFILTRATION NARRATIVE: INFILTRATION IS NOT PROVIDED AS PART OF THE PROJECT'S PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DUE TO THE TYPES OF SOILS PRESENT. THE SOILS PRESENT ARE CONSIDERED HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP "D" AND ARE NOT CONDUCIVE TO INFILTRATION. FILTRATION WILL BE PROVIDED IN LIEU OF INFILTRATION. SOIL CONTAMINATION NARRATIVE: SOILS ONSITE HAVE NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED AS CONTAMINATED. SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED): THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN ONE MILE AND DISCHARGES TO CLEARWATER CREEK - CLEARWATER CREEK IS IDENTIFIED AS IMPAIRED WATER BODIES PER THE MPCA'S 303(D) IMPAIRED WATERS LIST. CLEARWATER CREEK IMPAIRED FOR FISHES BIOASSESSMENTS, BENTHIC MACROINVERTEBRATE BIOASSESSMENTS. BECAUSE THESE WATERS ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SITE, BMPS AS DEFINED IN THE NPDES PERMIT ITEMS 23.9 AND 23.10 APPLY. THESE ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. DURING CONSTRUCTION: A. STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE COMPLETED LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. B. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 14. MUST BE USED FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THAT SERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME. PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC: PERMANENT SEED MIX • FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE PERMANENT SEED MIX. •• AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PER ACRE. •• DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE. • MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. O O O (C h7R a Om E O M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 M I L L E P HANSON Cn z LU Q am a M LID Ln O D >Q 2 07 M N IZT L0 Ln Z (n 2 W C HO W i0- WZ a Z 02i 07 Lu U. Q I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SWPPP - NARRATIVE ■ 2/14/2019 4:59 PM 0 COPYRIGHT201S CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ATTACHMENT A: SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT PROJECT NAME: NORMAN WOODS PROJECT LOCATION (BRIEFLY DESCRIBE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OCCURS. INCLUDE ADDRESS IF AVAILABLE.) ADDRESS: 4571 ROSEMARY WAY CITY OR TOWNSHIP: HUGO STATE: MN ZIP CODE: 55038 LATITUDE/LOGITUDE OF APPROXIMATE CENTROID OF PROJECT: 45°09'44" N, 93°00'49" E METHOD OF LAT/LONG COLLECTION (CIRCLE ONE): GPS ONLINE TOOL SGS TOPOGRAPHIC ALL CITIES WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: HUGO ALL COUNTIES WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: WASHINGTON ALL TOWNSHIPS WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: N/A PROJECT SIZE (NUMBER OF ACRES TO BE DISTURBED): 3.07 PROJECT TYPE (CIRCLE ONE): RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ROAD CONSTRUCTION RESIDENTIAL & RD CONSTRUCTION OTHER (DESCRIBE): XXXXX CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (TO THE NEAREST TENTH ACRE) EXISTING AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 0.00 POST CONSTRUCTION AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 1.10 TOTAL NEW AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 1.10 RECEIVING WATERS WATER BODY ID NAME OF WATER BODY WATER BODY TYPE SPECIAL WATER? (Y/N) IMPARIED WATER (Y/N) 07010206-519 CLEARWATER CREEK CREEK N Y DATES OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION START DATE: 06/19 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: 06/21 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT INFORMATION DESCRIBE THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (WHAT WILL BE BUILT, GENERAL TIMELINE, ETC): CONSTRUCT NEW APARTMENT, WITH PARKING, UTILITIES, AND LANDSCAPING IMPROVEMENTS DESCRIBE SOIL TYPES FOUND AT THE PROJECT: THE DOMINANT SOILS AT DEPTHS WERE MORE UNIFORM GLACIAL TILL DEPOSITS CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF CLAYEY SANDS TO SANDY LEAN CLAYS. THESE MATERIALS WERE COMMONLY BROWN TO DEPTHS OF ABOUT 12 FEET AND GRAY AT DEPTH, THOUGH THE SOILS IN SOME BORINGS WERE BROWN THROUGHOUT THE DEPTHS EXPLORED AND OTHERS WERE GRAY FOR THE FULL DEPTH. ALL THE BORING TERMINATED IN THE GLACIAL TILL SOILS. SITE LOCATION MAP - ATTACH MAPS (U.S. GEOLOGIC SURVEY 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAPS OR EQUIVALENT) SHOWING THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL RECEIVING WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS, DRAINAGE DITCHES, STORMWATER PONDS, OR BASINS, ETC. THAT WILL RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT. USE ARROWS SHOWING THE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND DISTANCE TO THE WATER BODY. ..i ij� 6 Loko ,�t�rn y --rLYr� i0D:ylnr �. 'Perin etEr. G."4-ni - r E C.rd 11. li �ryugo 4 f J 1:1?rn1 =1 N GENERAL SITE INFORMATION (III.A) 1. DESCRIBE THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROTION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICIES (BMP'S). INCLUDE THE TIMING FOR INSTALLATION AND PROCEDURES USED TO ESTABLISH ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY BMP'S AS NECESSARY. (III.A.4.A) THE PROJECT IS PROTECTED BY TWO (W) MAIN BMP'S, SILT FENCE AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. THE SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE AND MONITORED AS NECESSARY. INLET PROTECTION DEVIDES WILL BE INSTALLED IN ALL CATCH BASINS ON THE SITE AND ANY OFF SITE THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THIS SITE. AS THE PROJECT PROGRESSES ADDITIONAL BMP'S SUCH AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MAY BE UTILITZED. 2. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A TABLE WITH THE ANTICIPATED QUANITITIES FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT FOR ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (III.A.4.13) SEE PAGE SW1.3 3. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A SITE MAP THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING FEATURES (III.A.3.B-F): EXIST AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST -CONSTRUCTION STORMRWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AND SOIL TYPES. • EXISTING AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST -CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS. • LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTRUBED. • LOCATION OF AREAS OF PHASED CONSTRUCTION. • ALL SURFACE WATERS AND EXISTING WETLANDS WITHIN ONE MILE FROM THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE (IDENTIFIABLE ON MAPS SUCH AS USGS 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE MAPS OR EQUIVALENT. WHERE SURFACE WATERS RECEIVING RUNOFF ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WILL NOT FIT ON THE PLAN SHEET, THEY MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH AN ARROW, INDICATING BOTH DIRECTION AND DISTANCE TO THE SURFACE WATER. • METHODS TO BE USED FOR FINAL STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREA 4. WERE STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRED AS THE RESULT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, OR OTHER REQUIRED LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL REVIEW OF THE PROJECT? NO IF YES, DESCRIBE HOW THESE MEASURES WERE ADDRESSED IN THE SWPPP. (III.A.6) N/A 5. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED IN A KARST AREA SUCH THAT ADDITIONAL MEASURES WOULD BE NECESSARY OT PROJECT DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS AS DESCRIBED IN MINN. R. CHAPTERS 7050 AND 7060? NO IF YES, DESCRIBE THE ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO BE USED. (III.A.7) N/A 6. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A CALCEREOUS FEN LISTED IN MINN. R. 7050.0180, SUBP. 6 B? NO IF YES, A LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO APPLICATION FOR THIS PERMIT. (PART I B.6 AND PART III.A.8) 7. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A WATER THAT IS LISTED AS IMPAIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING POLLUTANT(S) OR STRESSOR(S): PHOSPHORUS, TURBIDITY, DISSOLVED OXYGEN OR BIOTIC IMPAIRMENT? USE THE SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS SEARCH TOOL AT: WWW.PCA.STATE.MN.US/WATER/STORMWATER/STORMWATER-C.HTML N/A IF NO, SKIP TO TRAINING DOES THE IMPAIRED WATER HAVE AN APPROVED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS (TMDL) WITH AN APPROVED WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY? NO IF YES: A. LIST THE RECEIVING WATER, THE AREAS OF THE SITE DISCHARGING TO IT, AND THE POLLUTANT(S) IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL. B. LIST THE BMP'S AND ANY OTHER SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RELATED IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL. IF THE SITE HAS A DISCHARGE POINT WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE IMPAIRED WATER AND THE WATER FLOWS TO THE IMPAIRED WATER BUT NO SPECIFIC BMPS FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL, THE ADDITIONAL BMPS IN APPENDIX A (C.1, C.2, C.3 & (C.4 -TROUT STREAM)) MUST BE ADDED TO THE SWPPP AND IMPLEMENTED. (III.A.7). THE ADDITIONAL BMPS ONLY APPLY TO THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT THAT DRAIN TO ONE OF THE IDENTIFIED DISCHARGE POINTS. N/A 8. IDENTIFY ADJACENT PUBLIC WATERS WHERE THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) HAS DECLARED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURING FISH SPAWNING TIMEFRAMES N/A SELECTION OF A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (III.D.) 1. WILL THE PROJECT CREATE A NEW CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO ONE ACRE? YES IF YES, A WATER QUALITY VOLUME OF ONE INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE CUMULATIVE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE (SEE PART IIID OF THE PERMIT) THROUGH INFILTRATION UNLESS PROHIBITED DUE TO ONE OF THE REASONS IN PART III.D.1.J. IF INFILTRATION IS PROHIBITED IDENTIFY OTHER METHOD OF OTHER VOLUME REDUCTION (E.G., FILTRATION SYSTEM, WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN, REGIONAL PONDING OR EQUIVALENT METHOD 2. DESCRIBE WHICH METHOD WILL BE USED TO TREAT RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT (III.D): • WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN • INFILTRATION/FILTRATION • REGIONAL PONDS • COMBINATION OF PRACTICES INCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS AND DESIGN INFORMATION FOR THE METHOD SELECTED. SEE PART IIID OF THE PERMIT FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH EACH METHOD. INFILTRATION / FILTRATION / REGIONAL PONDING CALCULATIONS ARE WITHIN THE SITE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT AND PART OF THIS SWPPP AS ATTACHMENT D. 3. IF IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO MEET THE TREATMENT REQUIREMENT FOR THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME, DESCRIBE WHY. THIS CAN INCLUDE PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAY PRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANY PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENT, SUCH AS GRASSES SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS, WILL BE IMPLEMENTED TO TREAT RUNOFF PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. (III.C) IT IS FEASIBLE TO MEET REQUIREMENT FOR WATER QUALITY VOLUME. 4. FOR PROJECTS THAT DISCHARGE TO TROUT STREAMS, INCLUDING TRIBUTARIES TO TROUT STREAMS, IDENTIFY METHOD OF INCORPORATING TEMPERATURE CONTROLS INTO THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. N/A EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES (IV.B) DESCRIBE THE TYPES OF TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION BMP'S EXPECTED TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCITON: 1. DESCRIBE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES TO MINIMIZE EROSION. DELINEATE AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED (E.G., WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC.) BEFORE WORK BEGINS. SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT ATHE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE. 2. DESCRIBE METHODS OF TEMPORARILY STABILIZING SOILS AND SOIL STOCKPILES (E.G., MULCHES, HYDRAULIC TACKIFIERS, EROSION BLANKETS, ETC.): TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION WILL BE SEED AND MULCH AND EROSION BLANKETS WHERE REQUIRED, WITH PERMANENT COVER BEING EITHER SOD OR LANDSCAPE FEATURES. 3. DESCRIBE METHODS OF DISSIPATING VELOCITY ALONG STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND AT CHANNEL OUTLETS (E.G., CHECK DAMS, SEDIMENT TRAPS, RIP RAP, ETC.): SOD WILL BE UTILIZED ALONG CHANNELS AND RIP RAP AT CHANNEL. 4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STABILIZATION OF DITCH AND SWALE WETTED PERIMETERS (NOTE THAT MULCH, HYDRAULIC SOIL TACKIFIERS, HYDROMULCHES, ETC. ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE SOIL STABILIZATION METHODS FOR ANY PART OF A DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE) FINAL STABILIZATION OF SWALES WILL BE SOD 5. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE OUTLETS (E.G., RIP RAP, SPLASH PADS, GABIONS, ETC.) RIP RAP WILL BE UTILIZED AT PIPE OUTLETS 6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO PROMOTE INFILTRATION AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL ON THE SITE PRIOR TO OFFSITE DISCHARGE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE (E.G., DIRECT STORMWATER FLOW TO VEGETATED AREAS): DISCONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREA AND INFILTRATION AREAS WILL BE UTILIZED 7. FOR DRAINAGE OR DIVERSION DITCHES, DESCRIBE PRACTICES TO STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET OF THE PROPERTY EDGE OR POINT OF DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATER. THE LAST 200 LINEAL FEET MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO SURFACE WATERS AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED FOR ALL DISCHARGES TO SPECIAL, IMPAIRED OR "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS". ALL OTHER REMAINING PORTIONS OF THE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER, PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT AREA HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. N/A, NO DITCHES ON SITE 8. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION MEASURES THAT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION (E.G., CONSTRUCTION PHASING, MINIMIZING SOIL DISTURBANCE, VEGETATIVE BUFFERS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, SLOPE DRAINING/TERRACING, ETC.): OTHER EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO; MINIMIZING SITE EXPOSURE WHEN POSSIBLE. 9. IF APPLICABLE, INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN APPENDIX A PART C.3 REGARDING MAINTAINING A 100 -FOOT BUFFER ZONE OR INSTALLING REDUNDANT BMPS FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO SPECIAL WATERS). N/A 10. IF APPLICABLE, DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE TO PROTECT PLANNED INFILTRATION AREAS MINIMIZE SITE EXPOSURE IN AREAS ADJACENT TO INFILTRATION AREAS. SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICIES (IV.C) DESCRIBE THE METHODS OF SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT IMPACTS TO SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS 1. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL: SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SITE 2. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SOIL STOCKPILES: SEED AND MULCH AS WELL AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKETS WILL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY 3. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION: SEE INLET PROTECTION DETAILS 4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO MINIMIZE VEHICLE TRACKING AT CONSTRUCTION EXITS AND STREET SWEEPING ACTIVITIES: THE PROJECT WILL UTILIZE A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 5. DESCRIBE METHODS, IF APPLICABLE, ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO BE INSTALLED TO KEEP RUNOFF AWAY FROM PLANNED INFILTRATION AREAS WHEN EXCAVATED PRIOR TO FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA: SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING TO PROTECT INFILTRATION AREAS. 6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND PRESERVE TOP SOIL (UNLESS INFEASIBLE) AT THIS SITE: LIGHT TRACKED EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED, TOPSOIL WILL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED 7. DESCRIBE PLANS TO PRESERVE A 50 -FOOT NATURAL BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROJECT'S SOIL DISTURBANCE AND A SURFACE WATER OR PLANS FOR REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE: DOUBLE ROW OF SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG WETLAND. PROJECT WILL NOT DISTURB WITHIN 200 FEET OF WETLAND. 8. DESCRIBE PLANS FOR USE OF SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS (E.G., POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, ETC.) SEE PART IV.C.10 OF THE PERMIT: N/A 9. IS THE PROJECT REQUIRED TO INSTALL A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN DUE TO 10 OR MORE ACRES DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCATION OR 5 ACRES OR MORE IF THE SITE IS WITHIN 1 MILE OF A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER? NO IF YES, DESCRIBE (OR ATTACH PLANS) SHOWING HOW THE BASIN WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART III.0 OF THE PERMIT. N/A DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (IV.D) 1. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING? NO IF YES, DESCRIBE MEASURES TO BE USED TO TREAT/DISPOSE OF TURBID OR SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER AND METHOD TO PREVENT EROSION OR SCOUR OF DISCHARGE POINTS (SEE PART IV. D OF THE PERMIT): N/A 2. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE USE OF FILTERS FOR BACKWASH WATER? NO IF YES, DESCRIBE HOW FILTER BACKWASH WATER WILL BE MANAGED ON THE SITE OR PROPERLY DISPOSED (SEE PART III.D.3. OF THE PERMIT): N/A ADDITIONAL BMP'S FOR SPECIAL WATERS AND DISCHARGES TO WETLANDS (APPENDIX A, PARTS C AND D) 1. SPECIAL WATERS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE TO SPECIAL WATERS? NO 2. IF PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAY PRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANY OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, THEN OTHER TREATMENT SUCH AS GRASSED SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENT WILL BE PROVIDED. N/A 3. DESCRIBE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOR EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A CONTINUOUS POSITIVE SLOPE TO A SPECIAL WATERS, AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS FOR AREAS THAT DRAIN FIVE OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME. N/A 4. DESCRIBE THE UNDISTURBED BUFFER ZONE TO BE USED (NOT LESS THAN 100 LINEAR FEET FROM THE SPECIAL WATER). N/A 5. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL ENSURE THAT THE PRE AND POST PROJECT RUNOFF RATE AND VOLUME FROM THE 1, AND 2 -YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION EVENTS REMAINS THE SAME. N/A 6. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL MINIMIZE ANY INCREASE IN THE TEMPERATURE OF TROUT STREAM RECEIVING WATERS RESULTING IN THE 1, AND 2 -YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION EVENTS. N/A 7. WETLANDS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE STORMWATER WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS TO A WETLAND (E.G., CONVERSION OF A NATURAL WETLAND TO A STORMWATER POND)? YES OR NO IF YES, DESCRIBE THE WETLAND MITIGATION SEQUENCE THAT WILL BE FOLLOWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART D OF APPENDIX A. N/A INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (IV.E) DESCRIBE PROCEDURES TO ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE: • ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND • WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND WITHIN (7) DAYS AFTER THAT INSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE STABILIZED AREAS, EROSION PREVENTION,AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND INFILTRATION AREAS. INSPECTOR WILL FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED ABOVE AND FILL OUT "ATTACHMENT B - CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST" 1. Describe practices for storage of building products with a potential to leach pollutants to minimize exposure to stormwater: ALL BUILDING PRODUCTS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE 2. Describe practices for storage of pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemical, and landscape materials: ALL LANDSCAPE TREATMENT CHEMICALS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZED EXPOSURE 3. Describe practices for storage and disposal of hazardous materials or toxic waste (e.g., oil, fuel, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum-based products, wood preservative, additives, curing compounds, and acids) according to Minn. R. ch. 7045, including restricted access and secondary containment: ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS. 4. Describe collection, storage and disposal of solid waste in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035: ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND SOLID WASTER WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS 5. Describe management of portable toilets to prevent tipping and disposal of sanitary wastes in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7040: SANITARY AND SEPTIC SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED TO WORKERS WITH PORTABLE FACILITIES MAINTAINED AS NEEDED BY THE PROVIDER. 6. Describe spill prevention and response for fueling and equipment or vehicle maintenance: EMPLOYEES WILL BE TRAINED IN TECHNIQUES DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE SPILLS. VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CHECKED FOR LEAKS. 7. Describe containment and disposal of vehicle and equipment wash water and prohibiting engine degreasing on the site: ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES SHALL BE WASHED OFF SITE 8. Describe storage and disposal of concrete and other washout wastes so that wastes do not contact the ground: ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR OFF SITE. FINAL STABILIZATION (IV.G) 1. DESCRIBE METHOD OF FINAL STABILIZATION (PERMANENT COVER) OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS: FINAL STABILIZATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH PAVEMENT, SOD AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. 2. DESCRIBE PROCEDURES FOR COMPLETING FINAL STABILIZATION AND TERMINATING PERMIT COVERAGE (SEE PART IV.G.1-5): UPON STABILIZATION DESCRIBED ABOVE, THE CONTRCTOR AND OWNER SHALL MUTUALLY TRANSFER THE NPDES PERMIT TO THE NEXT OWNER WITH DOCUMENTS DESCRIBING THE NATURE OF TERMINATION PROCEDURE. 0 0 so�e C� G3 O M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 M I L L E P HANSON a r c h i t e c t s Nt M IV J L0 . ■ . C W_ G O � W 2 a > O >Q a 1121� LL 2 LUW Of N IV J L0 CZ G J 0- LUZ Z 2 C LU LU __J __J L0 CO ti I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE No. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS ■ 2/14/2019 4:59 PM ©COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. ATTACHMENT B: SWPPP INSPECTION FORM NOTE: THIS INSPECTION REPORT DOES NOT ADDRESS ALL ASPECTS OF THE NATIONAL APOLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT ISSUED ON AUGUST 1, ATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM 2013. THE COMPLETION OF THIS CHECKLIST DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ARE IN COMPLIANCE; IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE(S) TO READ AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. ATTACHMENT C - ABOVE -GROUND ❑ ❑ 2. PERIMETER CONTROL TRENCHED IN WHERE APPROPRIATE? FACILITY MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE FACILITY INFORMATION ❑ 3. 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER MAINTAINED AROUND ALL SURFACE WATERS? ❑ SITE NAME: ❑ 3.1. IF NO, HAVE REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS BEEN INSTALLED? 1 . ALL STORMWATER RETENTION, DETENTION AND TREATMENT BASINS MUST BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR TO DETERMINE THAT BASIN FACILITY ADDRESS: PERMIT NUMBER: ❑ 4. INLET PROTECTION ON ALL CATCH BASINS AND CULVERT INLETS? RETENTION AND TREATMENT CHARACTERISTICS ARE ADEQUATE. A STORAGE TREATMENT BASIN WILL BE CONSIDERED INADEQUATE IF SEDIMENT CITY: STATE: ZIP CODE: ❑ 5. VEHICLE TRACKING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AT ALL SITE EXITS? HAS DECREASED THE WET STORAGE VOLUME BY 50 PERCENT OR DRY STORAGE VOLUME BY 25 PERCENT OF ITS ORIGINAL DESIGN VOLUME. ❑ ❑ 6. ALL TRACKED SEDIMENT REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS? BASED ON THIS INSPECTION, IF A STORMWATER BASIN REQUIRES SEDIMENT CLEANOUT, THE BASIN WILL BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL DESIGN INSPECTION INFORMATION ❑ 7. ARE ALL INFILTRATION SYSTEMS STAKED AND MARKED TO AVOID COMPACTION? CONTOURS AND VEGETATED STATE WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE INSPECTION DATE. INSPECTOR NAME: PHONE NUMBER: ❑ 8. ARE ALL INFILTRATION AREAS PROTECTED WITH A PRETREATMENT DEVICE? 2. ALL OUTLET STRUCTURES, CULVERTS, OUTFALL STRUCTURES AND OTHER STORMWATER FACILITIES FOR WHICH MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS DATE (MM/DD/YYYY): TIME: AM / PM ❑ 9. DO ALL STOCKPILES HAVE PERIMETER CONTROLS? ARE NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED HEREIN MUST BE INSPECTED IN THE SPRING, SUMMER AND FALL OF EACH YEAR. WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE IS THE INSPECTOR CERTIFIED IN SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL AND IS IT DOCUMENTED IN THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)? INSPECTION DATE, ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS MUST BE REMOVED SUCH THAT EACH STORMWATER FACILITY OPERATES AS IS THIS INSPECTION ROUTINE OR IN RESPONSE TO A STORM EVENT: DESIGNED AND PERMITTED. CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BE KEPT CLEAR OF LITTER AND VEGETATIVE DEBRIS, INFLOW PIPES AND RAINFALL AMOUNT (IF APPLICABLE): OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS KEPT CLEAR, INLET AREAS KEPT CLEAN, AND UNDESIRABLE VEGETATION REMOVED. EROSION IMPAIRING THE FUNCTION IS THE SITE WITHIN ONE AERIAL MILE OF A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER? OR INTEGRITY OF THE FACILITIES, IF ANY, WILL BE CORRECTED, AND ANY STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IMPAIRING OR THREATENING TO IMPAIR THE IF YES, FOLLOW APPENDIX A AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FUNCTION OF THE FACILITIES MUST BE REPAIRED. 3. VOLUME CONTROL FACILITIES AND CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED EVERY THREE MONTHS DURING THE OPERATIONAL NOTE: IF N/A IS SELECTED AT ANY TIME, SPECIFY WHY IN THE COMMENT AREA FOR THAT SECTION. PERIOD (BETWEEN SPRING SNOWMELT AND FIRST SUBSTANTIAL SNOWFALL) AND MONITORED AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS OF 1 INCH OR MORE TO ENSURE THAT THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS CLEAR OF LITTER AND DEBRIS, INFLOW PIPES AND OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS ARE CLEAR, INLET AREAS ARE CLEAN, UNDESIRABLE VEGETATION IS REMOVED AND THERE IS NO EROSION IMPAIRING OR THREATENING TO IMPAIR THE FUNCTION EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENT (PART IV.B) OF A FACILITY. IF SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED IN A INFILTRATION FEATURE, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF INSPECTION DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS MUST BE Y N N/A REMOVED, THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS MUST BE RESTORED, AND ANY SURFACE DISTURBANCE MUST BE STABILIZED. 1. SOIL STABILIZATION WHERE NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FOR 14 DAYS? (7 DAYS WHERE APPLICABLE) ❑ ❑ ❑ INSPECTION MUST ENSURE THAT SEDIMENT TRAPS AND FOREBAYS ARE TRAPPING SEDIMENT AND THAT MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE 2. HAS THE NEED TO DISTURB STEEP SLOPES BEEN MINIMIZED? ❑ ❑ ❑ STORAGE VOLUME REMAINS, THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS STABLE (I.E., NO EROSION IS OBSERVED), AND INLETS AND 3. ALL DITCHES STABILIZED 200; BACK FROM POINT OF DISCHARGE WITHIN 24 HOURS? (NOT MULCH) ❑ ❑ ❑ OUTLET/OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS ARE IN GOOD CONDITIONS WITH NO EROSION. MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES USED MUST PROTECT THE 4. ARE THERE BMP'S FOR ONSITE STOCKPILES? ❑ ❑ ❑ INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE PRACTICE BY LIMITING SOIL COMPACTION TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE (E.G., BY USING LOW -IMPACT 5. ARE APPROPRIATE BMP'S INSTALLED PROTECTING INLETS/OUTLETS? ❑ ❑ ❑ EARTH -MOVING EQUIPMENT). 6. DO PIPE OUTLETS HAVE ENERGY DISSIPATION? n n I-1 COMMENTS: SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT (PART IV.C) Y N N/A 1. PERIMETER CONTROL INSTALLED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. PERIMETER CONTROL TRENCHED IN WHERE APPROPRIATE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER MAINTAINED AROUND ALL SURFACE WATERS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3.1. IF NO, HAVE REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS BEEN INSTALLED? ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. INLET PROTECTION ON ALL CATCH BASINS AND CULVERT INLETS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. VEHICLE TRACKING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AT ALL SITE EXITS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. ALL TRACKED SEDIMENT REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 7. ARE ALL INFILTRATION SYSTEMS STAKED AND MARKED TO AVOID COMPACTION? ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. ARE ALL INFILTRATION AREAS PROTECTED WITH A PRETREATMENT DEVICE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 9. DO ALL STOCKPILES HAVE PERIMETER CONTROLS? ❑ ❑ ❑ COMMENTS: MAINTENANCE -EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (PART IV.E.) Y N N/A 1. ARE ALL PREVIOUSLY STABILIZED AREAS MAINTAINING 90% GROUND COVER? ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. ANY UlIGHER06101\101361ERVIED? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. PERIMETER CONTROL --HAS SEDIMENT REACHED ONE HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. ARE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES MAINTAINED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY? COMMENTS: OTHER Y N N/A 1. ARE ALL MATERIALS THAT CAN LEACH POLLUTANTS UNDER COVER? ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. HAS ACCESS BEEN RESTRICTED TO ONSITE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. DOES ON-SITE FUELING ONLY OCCUR IN A CONTAINED AREA? ❑ ❑ ❑ . ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. IS THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA COMPLETELY CONTAINED? 6. IS THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA MARKED WITH SIGN? El El El COMMENTS: Y N N/A 7. WERE ANY DISCHARGES SEEN DURING THIS INSPECTION, SEDIMENT, WATER, OR OTHERWISE? 7.1. IF YES, STATE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL POINTS OF DISCHARGE. PHOTOGRAPH THE DISCHARGE AND DESCRIBE THE DISCHARGE (COLOR, ODOR, FOAM, OIL SHEEN, ETC). HOW WILL IT BE REMOVED? HOW DID THE DISCHARGE HAPPEN? HOW MUCH WAS DISCHARGED? HOW WILL IT BE STOPPED, AND HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE TO STOP? IS THE DISCHARGE GOING INTO AN ADJACENT SITE? WAS THE DISCHARGE A SEDIMENT DELTA? IF YES, WILL THE DELTA BE RECOVERED WITHIN 7 DAYS? 8. WILL A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BE UTILIZED IN THIS PROJECT AS REQUIRED AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART III.D OF THE PERMIT? DESCRIBE: Y N N/A 9. IS ANY DEWATERING OCCURRING ON SITE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 9.1. IF YES, WHERE? WHAT BMP IS BEING USED? HOW MUCH WATER IS BEING DEWATERED? IS THE WATER CLEAR? WHERE IS THE WATER BEING DISCHARGED TO? Y N N/A 10. IS A COPY OF THE SWPPP LOCATED ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 11. HAS THE SWPPP BEEN FOLLOWED AND IMPLEMENTED ON SITE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 12. IS A SEDIMENTATION BASIN REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT AS SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT? ❑ ❑ ❑ 12.1. IF YES, ARE THEY MAINTAINED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT? ❑ ❑ ❑ 13. IS THE TOPSOIL ON THIS PROJECT BEING PRESERVED? ❑ ❑ ❑ 13.1. IF YES, EXPLAIN HOW THE TOPSOIL IS BEING PRESERVED. IF NO, EXPLAIN WHY IT WAS INFEASIBLE. 14. ARE ALL INFILTRATION SYSTEMS MARKED TO AVOID COMPACTION? Y ❑ N ❑ N/A ❑ 14.1. DO ALL INFILTRATION AREAS HAVE PRETREATMENT DEVICES? ❑ ❑ ❑ 15. DESCRIPTION OF AREAS OF NON-COMPLIANCE NOTED DURING THE INSPECTION, REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, AND RECOMMENDED DATE OF COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: 16. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP: 17. POTENTIAL AREAS OF FUTURE CONCERN: 18. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS DISCLOSURES: • AFTER DISCOVERY, THE PERMIT REQUIRES MANY OF THE DEFICIENCIES THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THIS CHECKLIST BE CORRECTED WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD OF TIME. SEE PERMIT FOR MORE DETAILS. • THIS INSPECTION CHECKLIST IS AN OPTION FOR SMALL CONSTRUCTION SITES. LARGE CONSTRUCTION SITES AND LINEAR PROJECTS REQUIRE MORE EXTENSIVE/MORE LOCATION SPECIFIC INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS. • THE PERMITTEE(S) IS/ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BMP'S AS WELL AS EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S UNTIL ANOTHER PERMITTEE HAS OBTAINED COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT ACCORDING TO PART II.B.5., OR THE PROJECT HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. O O O C� G3 O M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 M I L L E P HANSON Cn z LU Q am a Nt M 't U')'^ v♦ U7 W O � 0 W =a O A Q LL U elf M N IZT U7 U7 Z _LD J O LU Z 2 C LU LU J 0 J U7 CO ti I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 2/15/19 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:BN REVIEWED BY: DK PROJECT NUMBER: 18125 REVISION SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS 2/14/2019 4:59 PM 0 COPYRIGHT2018 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. r„ , L I r ■ + . 1' •T L i r r- ir_ f ' _5 _•' 11 r r' . IF, F , wN1.` ' L �L' L JI •, 1 r ti •� � -16A ip• = ■ 1 err r _ M 1; _ 1 yEML r f■ ■, L _ 1 •. 00; 06 r r + r :16�.. . . %mru .16'� =O �=� rm -9r ...F ■ _ 17 1 .50 vml� • W Ew 1 I tiIL r - 94 i• r + ri • a 1' ' T Ir i Al lit rn1 % Alor., I .. r43t. ■ i ■ r• +L- 36 +�� }� 1' Ile 9. L4 • 1' 41 r' Ir IC 0 1,�.�ti.1 � r � ■ . f - .� .' � ++�.� 1 -1 _ �• _ •r it 7' •�' .r ,- ... ■• • . •L ��•� 1 - a.ti• �1 - + . - .r , •I I r,d. 1• •1 : - . _ .. ~•-�j.'rj�J ��7711ff f ti 1 i 1 •,, 1' 1 1 r ■_ 1 OL 1 1 •' rr r - ' ' '' • LA,. 1 AN _r 1• 11 A IL 1 91 L , 1 F -,% J �� . ti � , y . 1 ti 1 •r.- T + r'' L r - ML •r - -A 1 r i % 1 , f 1 r 1 r 1� % I IL 17 - q Lti ti �• % 1 r 1.16 1 •� Z • 11 ~_' • Lam' _ . r r A - - rr■r■��■■����JJJJ 111111, ry}-_ 1 41•�. , — — - r ' ■ r L + • r � :1 J. r 7IL•r 1 11 ) 1 ' J .1 ■ r - •, •r� IL- 7 4h a •• �•� L it '� '-VIIIII.E.111 irr ra - 1 +` _ ■ Tr1 ' LI L _ PRELIMINARY NOT FOR �Q 46 OD 0 IN .Wi (\ y y y y y ) i SITE PLAN 1• - 30'-0• i W W W W W WETLAND, --------------------- .d •d • d . d • • . . \ \ \ • • d•. ,• - PRELIMINARY NOT ISSUE & REVISION PROOFFM BET• 1V20/18 CITY WBM88101% 2/15/19 COMM 91809 tu Z a � O w F— t N Q d 0 lal WM N o N3NOmto OQ z � o = p a w p M Q Q F U) Ll') V 14 0NtH F- LU > LU Ha¢� z m LLJ ED J wQpLU Y LL a 0 Co Co c 00 0. No ~ C N N -K�np N3NQ IN[� J r O J m SO J W 3� to m V 0,* MNuiH ro N 16 It LO m t W > Z CID W m M N ;, oOC a W LL LO Cm 50 RtCID C_� U O O w F— O U a ao O Q W z LLUww WM z w p OQ z � o = p a w p �_ N U O O w O U a ao O z LLUww w�wz z w p J d d w awQ� z � o = p a w p �_ N Q Q F U) Ll') ~a~O F- LU > LU Ha¢� z m LLJ ED J wQpLU Y LL 00 W W ~ wOaa0 =wiz a a -K�np Z O N SITE PLAN 0 15' 30' 60' A201 FOR ONSTRUCTION 02019 Miller Hanson Architects GARAGE LEVEL PLAN 3/329 = 11-0' PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE & REVISION PROW88 SET- 1V28/18 CITY SUBMISSION- 2/15/19 COMM @1809 t r °o to z m � r1 E a ca a c O C H C to t co 00CD �N N CL m M CO r r 3 N CO CD 3 �O C�C`I V v U z O Lu It=O IL N M o Q oc oYc a o W W co CO H N CL V X300 N C J r m J m _z¢ a W 7 H m �_ N U It CO)co Cn l!j Fa~O z i >wpCj) LL �aa� Z W W ED IL ��..: Y 005 m C o Og cwiQz U) m: a o uJ W W Ch y N w N3N0aoU) of upiD Z 0 J r J r J > V C► � M co M N co W N W > HQz0 W 021 M 02 CL cc Oc5N CL w >' O. N W LL W) C� 3� 4D w t r °o to z m � r1 E a ca a c O C H C to t co 00CD �N N CL m M CO r r 3 N CO CD 3 �O C�C`I V v U C) O Lu H z Z Q W z i Z W w�wz IL U) 0a J o' � w awQ Z rn _z¢ Q t r °o to z m � r1 E a ca a c O C H C to t co 00CD �N N CL m M CO r r 3 N CO CD 3 �O C�C`I V v U C) O Lu Q0 z a ¢o O Z �Uww w�wz IL U) ziw0 J o' � w awQ Z rn _z¢ O o -w p �_ N ¢�¢� Cn l!j Fa~O >wpCj) LL �aa� Z W W ED Y LL Og cwiQz U) m: w��F- uJ W ~ waao of upiD Z 0 GARAGE LEVEL PLAN IA3001 02019 Miller Hanson Architects FIRST FLOOR PLAN 3/329 = 11-0' PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE & REVISION PROGRE88 SET- IV28/18 CITY SUBMISSION- 2/15/19 COMM @1809 t r °o to z m � r1 E a ca a c O C H C to t co 00CD �N N CL m M CO r r 3 N CO CD 3 �O C�C`I V v U z O Lu H IL O N M o Q oc oYc a o W W co CO H N CL V X300 N C J r m J m _z¢ a W S H m �_ N U It CO)co Cn l!j Fa~O z i >wpCj) LL �aa� Z W W ED IL ��..: Y 005 m C o Og cwiQz U) m: c7� a o uJ W W Ch y N w N3N0aoU) of upiD Z 0 J r J r J > V C► � M co M N co W N W > HQz0 W 021 M 02 CL cc Oc5N CL w >' O. N W LL W) C� 3� 4D w t r °o to z m � r1 E a ca a c O C H C to t co 00CD �N N CL m M CO r r 3 N CO CD 3 �O C�C`I V v U C) O Lu H z Z Q W z i Z W Lu IL U) oa J o' � w awQ Z rn _z¢ Q t r °o to z m � r1 E a ca a c O C H C to t co 00CD �N N CL m M CO r r 3 N CO CD 3 �O C�C`I V v U C) O Lu Q0 z a ¢o O Z �Uww LL' Lu IL U) ziw0 J o' � w awQ Z rn _z¢ O o -w p �_ N ¢�¢� Cn l!j Fa~O >wpCj) LL �aa� Z W W ED Y LL Og cwiQz U) m: w��F- uJ W ~ waao of upiD Z 0 FIRST FLOOR PLAN A310 02019 Miller Hanson Architects SECOND FLOOR PLAN 3/329 = 11-0' PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE & REVISION PROGRE88 SET- IV28/18 CITY SUBMISSION- 2/15/19 COMM @1809 t r °o to z m � r1 E a ca a c O C H C to t co 00 �N N CL m M CO r r 3 N CO CD 3 �O C�C`I V v U z O Lu It=O IL N M o Q oc oYc a o W W co CO H N CL V X300 N C J r m J m _z¢ a W S H m �_ N U It CO)co Cn l!j Fa~O z i >wpCj) LL �aa� Z W W Lu IL ��..: Y 005 m C o Og cwiQz U) m: c7� a o uJ W W Ch y N w N3N0aoU) of upiD Z 0 J r J r J > �(D7HIA W)m V C►V co M N C co W N W > HQz0 W 021 M 02 CL cc Oc5N CL w >' O. N W LL W) C� 3� t r °o to z m � r1 E a ca a c O C H C to t co 00 �N N CL m M CO r r 3 N CO CD 3 �O C�C`I V v U C) O Lu H z Z Q W z i Z W w�wz IL U) oa J o' � w awQ Z rn _z¢ Q t r °o to z m � r1 E a ca a c O C H C to t co 00 �N N CL m M CO r r 3 N CO CD 3 �O C�C`I V v U C) O Lu Q0 z a ¢o O Z �Uww w�wz IL U) ziw0 J o' � w awQ Z rn _z¢ O o -w p �_ N ¢�¢� Cn l!j Fa~O >wpCj) LL �aa� Z W W Lu Y LL Og cwiQz U) m: w��F- uJ W ~ waao of upiD Z 0 SECOND FLOOR PLAN IA32G 02019 Miller Hanson Architects THIRD FLOOR PLAN 3/329 = 11-0' PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE & REVISION PROGRE88 SET- IV28/18 CITY SUBMISSION- 2/15/19 COMM @1809 t r °o to z m � r1 E a ca a c O C H C to t co 00 �N N CL m M CO r r 3 N CO CD 3 �O C�C`I V v U z O Lu H IL O N M o Q oc oYc a o W W co CO H N CL V X300 N C J r m J m _z¢ a W 7 H m �_ N U It CO)co Cn l!j Fa~O z i >wpCj) LL �aa� Z W W Lu IL ��..: Y 005 m C o Og cwiQz U) m: c7� a o uJ W W Ch y N w N3N0aoU) of upiD Z 0 J r J r J > �(D7HIA W)m V C►V co M N C co W N W > HQz0 W 021 M 02 CL cc Oc5N CL w >' O. N W LL W) C� 3� t r °o to z m � r1 E a ca a c O C H C to t co 00 �N N CL m M CO r r 3 N CO CD 3 �O C�C`I V v U C) O Lu H z Z Q W z i Z W w�wz IL U) oa J o' � w awQ Z rn _z¢ Q t r °o to z m � r1 E a ca a c O C H C to t co 00 �N N CL m M CO r r 3 N CO CD 3 �O C�C`I V v U C) O Lu Q0 z a ¢o O Z �Uww w�wz IL U) ziw0 J o' � w awQ Z rn _z¢ O o -w p �_ N ¢�¢� Cn l!j Fa~O >wpCj) LL �aa� Z W W Lu Y LL Og cwiQz U) m: w��F- uJ W ~ waao of upiD Z 0 THIRD FLOOR PLAN IA3301 02019 Miller Hanson Architects UNIT 64 (1113sf GROSS, 1039sf NET) QUANTITY:6 1/41 ' 1'-0' 0 1 2 3 5 10 UNIT 131 (973sf GROSS. 904sf NET) QUANTITY:11 1/4• ' 1'-0' 0 1 2 3 5 10 UNIT B3 (973sf GROSS. 904sf NET) QUANTITY:1 1/4• 1? -0• "TYPE A" ACCESSIBLE UNIT, PER THE MN ACCESSIBILITY CODE 2015 M o 0 1 2 3 5 10 UNIT Al (714sf GROSS, 662sf NET) QUANTITY:4 1/411f ' 1'-0' 0 1 2 3 5 10 UNIT A2 (714sf GROSS, 662sf NET) QUANTITY:2 1/4. 1x-09 "TYPE A" ACCESSIBLE UNIT, PER THE MN ACCESSIBILITY CODE 2015 0 1 2 3 5 10 PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE & REVISION PROGRESS SET- 11/28/18 CITY SUBMISSION- 2/15/19 COMM •1809 00 N Cd IV LO co W >O� HQz0 W0 M 02 O0N a>' O. N W LLca Q C� 3� Lu z z to It=O IL N M o Q o� oYc a o CL W co CO H N CL V X300 N C J r m J m m a W S m J > U It CO) m 3 00 N Cd IV LO co W >O� HQz0 W0 M 02 O0N a>' O. N W LLca Q C� 3� Lu z z to IL Z Q :) Y 0� OC Co o O c7� a o W W Ch y N w(j) N 3 N 0 tQ m J r J m r J > 04 CO m 3 V C►� MNOH �u)z 00 N Cd IV LO co W >O� HQz0 W0 M 02 O0N a>' O. N W LLca Q C� 3� Lu t r CD m z to k0 Z Q W z a m O W c H W _ oa C -4 t co 0 tc0 N CL �N 04 m Q t r CD m z to k0 m r E a m O C c H O C fA C -4 t co 0 tc0 N CL �N 04 m CO CO rr- C4v-3 04 CO m 3 U CD m O z O UQ a a0 O Z LL rwz W ap�g z w O a�Irw awa< z, Z a7 O = �aw o 2 N HaHp f— � >wou �a< Z W w Lu �u)z LL LLI U Q Ow w w W waao ~ a a =wDz of u) Z 0 UNIT PLANS IA410 02019 Miller Hanson Architects UNIT C3 (1223sf GROSS, 1137sf NET) QUANTITY:2 1/49 - 1'-09 0 1 2 3 5 10 NOTE: SEE UNIT C3 PLAN FOR BALANCE OF NOTES. UNIT C3P (1234sf GROSS. 1147sf NET) QUANTITY:4 1/4• - 1'-0' 0 1 2 3 5 10 UNIT C1 (1213sf GROSS, 1129sf NET) QUANTITY:5 1/49 - 1'-0• 0 1 2 3 5 10 NOTE: SEE UNIT C1 PLAN FOR BALANCE OF NOTES. UNIT C1P (1224sf GROSS, 1139sf NET) QUANTITYA 1/49 - 1'-0• 0 1 2 3 5 10 UNIT C2 (1268sf GROSS, 1187sf NET) QUANTITY:6 0 1 2 3 5 10 1/4" = 1'-0" PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE & REVISION PROGRESS SET- 11/28/18 CITY SUBMISSION- 2/15/19 COMM •1809 M N C co W > W N �az0 wCL M 02 0 CL >' 0. N W LL to 0 3� Lu 4D z oo It=O IL N co o Q o� oYc a o CL W co CO H N CL V X300 N C J r m J m m a W S m J > U It CO) m 3 M N C co W > W N �az0 wCL M 02 0 CL >' 0. N W LL to 0 3� Lu 4D z oo co IL Z Q :) Y 0� OC Co o o c7� a o ''W W Ch y N w N3N0aotQ �N 04 m J r J r J > 04 CO m 3 V C►� CD U) M N C co W > W N �az0 wCL M 02 0 CL >' 0. N W LL to 0 3� Lu 4D t r o 0') oo co zto kD Z Q W z � c c o r � � ''W oa C -4 t tc0 co 0CD N CL �N 04 m a t r o 0') oo co zto kD m rE O Z a o r c H O C fA C -4 t tc0 co 0CD N CL �N 04 m CO CO rr- C4v-3 04 CO m 3 � O o 0') OLLJ z co O UQ a a0 11 w O Z LL Lu L LL, ap�g z w 0 a�Irw awa< Z a7 0 =Z 0 ¢ w o �_ N 2 LL' L!7 HaHp f— � >wou �a< Z W w ED �u)z LL p Q O w U) H W W L11 wOLLJaao ~ a a =wiz _amu» Z 0 UNIT PLANS A411 02019 Miller Hanson Architects .................... .................. . i ::.:::.: :...::...: n.:..:...:.. n...... u ■ u....... u i ...:........................................... AM i :: .............. ; ... ;::.;� :::s-::-:s-:s-::s::::s-: I ....... . asn;:n;:n;un::u:n;:n:::u:n;:n;::uNMI wall, T - - - - .■_._._.r.._■_._._._._._._■_i • _ _ _ _ _ _ _.u......r........ ...u.u...... o.._. u_unumunnnwuu■nnumumnwuumi • - - - - - - - - - - Am Emommm u■ ........ 11............... ..... ..u.:..... ......:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.: : ......................................................,...,,.......,...,.......,...,.......,...,.......... •u■un.uununuuuu■...■w■...uu■w■....a ........................... AUT �• - 11-c •ia............... a ........... a... ........................................................................................................... Mom ------------------------- I Al :1 [t]: 1191M nunmu uummuuuuuu.nr *1111:OMAN =:I[*]:RaAa%\I[e ..............,......................,...........,...........,......................................................................................... ....::.... ; :..........:.........:.:::: :.:::.:::.:::.:::.:::.;::.:::.:::.;::.:::.:::.;::.:::.:::.:s:::::-:Ss:::::-s:::: [ _._._..---•------------------- --•-•-•---._._._._._._._._........ ..,................................................. . 'R...", Am Am " AM MINIM ............... . . . . ... ..................................................on" . ': .■..uu..u.uu..uu.u..uu....u.u.u.ua • _ _ r .. ... ............................................................................................-- ---...-::.........................................................................................., ,girl I 1 Q-1. .................................... .■_■_■_■_._■_■_._■_■_■_._■_■_...,,,,,,,, Illlrrll�lrllrrllrrllrrllrrllrrllrrllrrllrrllrrllr ................................... .........................................................,........ A...... �.. ...—.,... - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ------:-----:------- ---.A - ...... M films alms I PANAMA MAIN a I Paul MANUA a ilsoll wommommon� ::.:........... .:.:.:.:.:.:.:..-............................................,,......... ---------------...................................................................: ...........:.....:.....:.....:........ :::::.:::.:::.:::.:::.:::.:::.:::.:::.:: ::::::::--.:.::-:-.� ::. .. - A..... —11 MINIM ::.:.:.::.:.:.:... ..:— -----r .......... ---------------.................................. ................................................... I 'RELIMINARY NOT FOR CQ •nnuu 7a_._ .u■ �nw ■o ......... Is .... I .MEMO_._, last .... III AN ■..u.N EAIM 0 11110111 MEMO_EM, 011]:11: I M :1101 .I :::.:::.:::.:::.:::.:::.:::.:::.::.::...........a.............;............:N..........:::.;::.:::.:::ae :- —::._ .._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._...._._._._._._._._._._._._. A,,.,. 1............... ,-------- symvmmavmmavmi slims ...........................................................................................■.:,........--=---------------- .._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._._.._._M............................._ AMA t... t... A... A... A... A. ,.N.vm 0 1 lawarm 0 Kim 0 1 lawalm 0 Kim 0 MIAMI 9M.Alm 0 MIAMI FMNAIN MMvm.N —Alm MAIM.. IMNAIM 0 Kim.. IMNAIM .... 1 movemovemoveme 'Em.. A... A... A... A.. . . _._._. _._._. _._._. _. _._. _...._. _. _._._. _._........................................._ . _.illo.....■.l.■■1-- ■ all ■■1..A1. — ■■ Iowa 1. — maysjllmvawl t.1.t11.t.1.t.1.t11•;-will _-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- ill - ill - ill - ill - ill - ill -__ 111 _ 1■ _■■.1■Il.r■l�■ll.■■.1■11.r■1.■_..■..1.■_.r.■..1■1 of 11 MI■Irl■Iy�r._.r._1.r■.1.„n 1.1...1...11lllmmmlmmll .11. E nnn■1_1.r. ■y.11■1+1.r1■■.1I■1r1.■l� wl � mile]: .._ AMM AMA. _.. ....................................... - ....................................................MAIN- . ..u _.... ... .... ... .u .. ... ..u. ... ... ..u. ..o _.... ... .Mo Rover . ._ .- muunumuunuumumumnumumnumu... 1_I ::i:i:i:i:i-i:i:i-i:i:i.M._._.� u. ■oup uu ._ _._.._._.._._....... .M ■ — .t....■....................................... \..1..ut...ro.1..u.aro...1..u..ro.MA l...lya.l. ■1....1...1A I _._._■ ............................................ \...1....ro.1.t...N1A111...1...I...IN.......A..IN..I.... AI .1..1..1.. .1..I.. . . . ._ . . ■ ........................................... ■ .-q ■.................................... P1, .l. 1uuEL u ;=uu= 1 1 i IM I=II�I LM ISI -U - III -I lino mile]: SRT ;• - 11-c Mile le :1[.]: 'RELIMINARY NOT FOR CQ I.t.I..O.t.l. :: ul.tO.t.lu.l.tO■t11.u11'■AI.._................... . .._.M► .► unA.uuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuroyaro1lro11luuuuu.` . ._M_► ............................... t..........A.............� ........■11■.1.■■..ro....I.....ro.A■.I........■.u.■.1.tA.11■■t■....■....■ya.1i.. _. _.MAMA_. _._._._. _._I._._._. _._I■................■■..........................M.�1ROOF t■■A.■■.1.■t1..tl■■.1.ul.■tl■■.l.■.l.■tt■u1.u.t■A....l. ■.l.t Al■■11.iro.....Iro.lro..■t1■ro..■.I.....ro.ro.I........ro.Iro...■11 MID -SLOPE R ■..I.....■.....1\.1111 ._._._._._._-_._._._._._._._._._._-_..I._._._._-_■ ..... ..in:::.:uu::..... u::..... a::.::n:uu::.::n:::u::.I...:::l::nim.,..:■:uu::.......royal �- ....uuu_ a_._._._._._M_._._M_._■_M_._._M_._._._._vu_._._M_O_■ ::.1t... .i■ ,t_. M._ qbbwbh i�-.-.-■........■■..■.....■..■.....■..■........■.......■■..........11U....■■..■........ i..—.....u.u._ Oulu 1l...lu.lu 11..11u.1u 11..11u.1.ul..ONt.1.slimoONt.l.■.1.....■.1.1...■■....1.■.1u 11■.11.1 i,.......► uuu— .jpppppuuuuuuu�.__._._■_._._■_._■_M_._._M_._._._._._._._._M_O_■ ........................ ...............11.................. .-.-.-.-. "I..11...............luu.......um.......m.....0 uluuuur.uutDuln.......uuu 'M._-�. ■U.A. - EMin& ......—.■.....■u■u■u■u._._._■_._._■_._■_M_._._M_._._._._._._._._M_O_■ l.■■l.■■l.■■l.■■l.■■1...............................................■ 11................... la1`I' .Iro.Iro...ro....I..... ro.A■.I■■...■t1■■.ya.A/la.ya..1■roll ■.....I■■1111 1.\\ ...11.■111..1..tl■tillul.■tl■■.l.■.l.■1..',.l.t.l.t11■■.l. ■.1.111■■.l." 1uuEL u ;=uu= 1 1 i IM I=II�I LM ISI -U - III -I lino mile]: SRT ;• - 11-c Mile le :1[.]: 'RELIMINARY NOT FOR CQ ROCK -F CMU AE GRADE, ELEVATI ( SMOOTH © TERM SMOOTH BELOW TYPICAL BUILDING SECTION 1/4• - 1'_0• 0 1 2 3 5 10 INK - 2ND ,GING 1 ST GARAGE PRELIMINARY NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ISSUE & REVISION PRO M88 SET- 1/28/18 I CIT11 Y SUB88M 2/15/19 COMM •1809 M N W W > �az0 w mCL M 15 oOc 0N wW U) c z U F a p O u� a � OC O d 0 W ow mO N y N O W C°Ci a LU O W M CO N NL p CO N O '0 �n 91 Q H�¢w OW zC0 :t �W 7HI:i m J VIt (AfAOH >wo� LL P: Q- M N W W > �az0 w mCL M 15 oOc 0N wW U) c z U F a p O u� OC OC O d 0 W a MON N U w w y N O W W m J r Q1 J r J > _ >O to m U Vv MWLAH M N W W > �az0 w mCL M 15 oOc 0N wW U) c L r z° 10 m � Cd > o c c c w O C N cm v t t0•L m 3 N 06 m c) c � 3 OD r ; N�lii m 3 r C C V II L U o U F �Z Q W z U w w Z W W � EL p �U-) � OQ J Q'0� W awQF z m �n 91 Q L r z° 10 m � Cd > o c c c w O C N cm v t t0•L m 3 N 06 m c) c � 3 OD r ; N�lii m 3 r C C V II L U o U F a U¢ F- a 0 O U w w Z I w z W � EL p �U-) � Ziw0 J Q'0� W awQF z m �n 91 0 0 H�¢w OW N cq vi >wo� LL P: Q- Z W LLI Lu W uw) Y LL V a Q w �rnx w��W W W d - 0 w _of�� Z ❑ BUILDING SECTIONS A600 02019 Miller Hanson Architects ❑❑ L n7 ME MIS i\ Oyu JJu n o0 uu :❑�: �mm . ❑❑ L n7 ME MIS i\ Oyu JJu n o0 uu u Aq -WIRROW, -ow dMilk. 4" qw- --4� it 41� 4 -------------- IJ L ❑u� M �❑� u �E Fis F r -MEL A � J rEm- IMM M 2345 u -------------- IJ L ❑u� M �❑� u �E Fis F r -MEL A � J rEm- IMM M 2345 0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 0.1 0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.2 +0.2 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 \ / +0.2 +0.4 +0.5 +0.5 0.5 10.4 10.4 10.4 +0.3 +0.1 +0.1 \ 1 SITE PLAN - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1 " = 20'-0" +0.7 +0.5 +0. \'0. \ / +2.3 +1 I +0.1 +0.0 Mark Description I SCHEDULE Lamp Watts Manufacturer RAB LIGHTING Catalog Number ALED4T260N/D10 +0.4 +0.8 +0.9 a WITH INTEGRAL OCCUPANCY SENSOR TO REDUCE LIGHTING TO TEMPERED STRAIGHT STEEL OQ U0� 0� F- - C 7 O L +0.9 +1 +1.7 1 U LOLO LO d F Z) z M S4T TWIN HEAD POLE LIGHT ASSEMBLY, TYPE 4 DISTRIBUTION, WITH +0.1 2.2 +3.0 2 2 ALED4T260N/D10 0 z_ I TEMPERED STRAIGHT STEEL w_[L[Lo +0.1 + +5.9 +5.8 4 GLASS POLE o LU w l 0 - ` O +0.2 .5 + .4 +7. +5 21 W RAB LIGHTING 1 M N TEMPERED +0.1 2.t 11.3 + 5 +5 a� 1 a co •� O "O 0: pIL N O 4 O WP2 EXTERIOR WALL PACK CLEAR WALL LED 35001m 1 RAB LIGHTING WPLED26N + 0.2 + 9.k 9.6 + .8 + 5 GLASS +0.1 5.e 1 + +4 1 1 +0.1 .3 +3. +3.4 +2 1 +0.1 +1. +1.8 +1.9 +0.0 +0.5 1.0 +1. +1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.6 +0.8 1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.4 +0. +1 +0.1 +0.1 +) .1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.2 +0.3 +0.7 +0.1 +0.1 /+0.1 +0.2 +0.2 +0.3 +0.4 +0.4 +0.6 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1/ +0.2 +0.3 +0.4 +0.6 +0.9 +1.1 + .2 +1 + 0.1 + 0.1 + 0.2 + 0.2 + 0.4 + 0.6 + 0.8 + 1.4 + 2 + 3.0 + 3 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +q.3 +0.5 +0.7 +1.1 +1.9 .3 +4.9 +7 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 10.3 +0.5 +0.7 +1.2 +2.3 .0 +7.1 +9 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.3 .5 +0.7 +1.2 +2.1 + .1 +7.4 +7 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.3 +0.5� +0.8 +1.1 +1.7 +2.5 +4.3 +7 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.4.7 +1.0 +1.2 +1 +2.6 +4 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.3 +0.5\ +0.8 +1.0 .2 +1.8 + \ +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.4 '0.6 +0.8 +1.1 +1.2 + +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.2 +0.4 +0.6 +0.8 +0.8 +0 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.2 +0.3 +0\4 +0.5 0.6 +0 1 SITE PLAN - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN 1 " = 20'-0" +0.7 +0.5 +0. \'0. \ / +2.3 +1 I +0.1 +0.0 Mark Description SITE LIGHTING FIXTURE Lens Louver Mounting SCHEDULE Lamp Watts Manufacturer RAB LIGHTING Catalog Number ALED4T260N/D10 S4 SINGLE HEAD POLE LIGHT ASSEMBLY, TYPE 4 DISTRIBUTION, FLAT CLEAR 20' SQUARE LED 283031m 261 W a WITH INTEGRAL OCCUPANCY SENSOR TO REDUCE LIGHTING TO TEMPERED STRAIGHT STEEL OQ U0� 0� F- - C 7 O L U) 30%. GLASS POLE U LOLO LO d F Z) z M S4T TWIN HEAD POLE LIGHT ASSEMBLY, TYPE 4 DISTRIBUTION, WITH FLAT CLEAR 20' SQUARE LED 283031m 522 W RAB LIGHTING ALED4T260N/D10 0 z_ INTEGRAL OCCUPANCY SENSOR TO REDUCE LIGHTING TO 30%. TEMPERED STRAIGHT STEEL w_[L[Lo m d'(4Z) z 0 GLASS POLE o LU w l 0 - ` O WP1 EXTERIOR WALL PACK CLEAR WALL LED 25001m 21 W RAB LIGHTING WPLED18N M N TEMPERED U) C w LO > Z M a� GLASS a co •� O "O 0: pIL N O a J c6 WP2 EXTERIOR WALL PACK CLEAR WALL LED 35001m 30 W RAB LIGHTING WPLED26N TEMPERED GLASS / +2.6 +1.0 +0.2 +0.0 + + + + + + '0. + + + + + 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.3 0.2 +0.0 +0.0 i +0.0 +0.0 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 +0.1 '0001� / / LIGHTING TYPE S4 & S4T 2 NOT TO SCALE C I a 4215 WHITE BEAR PARKWAY -SUITE 100, SAINT PAUL, MN 55110 MAIN: 651.426.9549 11 FAX: 651.426.5048 11 www.CTAMEP.com © 2017 CAIN THOMAS ASSOCIATES, INC. LIGHTING TYPE WP1 & WP2 3 NOT TO SCALE GENERAL NOTES A. BUILDING MOUNTED SHIELDED/CUTOFF TYPE SECURITY LIGHTING WILL BE PROVIDED AT EACH ENTRANCE/EGRESS FROM THE BUILDING AS INDICATED BY THE BUILDING FLOOR PLANS. B. SURFACE Al RECESSED MOUNTED SHIELDED/CUTOFF TYPE LIGHTING WILL BE PROVIDED AT EACH EXTERIOR BUILDING CANOPY Al SOFFIT AS INDICATED BY THE BUILDING FLOOR PLANS. C. ALL SITE/PARKING LOT, BALL COURTS AND SITE SIGNAGE LIGHTING SHALL BE CONTROLLED VIA MULTI -ZONE PHOTOCELL INITIATED TIMECLOCK SYSTEM (WITH SEPARATE ZONES FOR PARKING, BALL COURTS & SIGNAGE FUNCTIONS). TIMECLOCK(S) SHALL BE LOCATED ADJACENT TO THE ELECTRICAL PANEL FROM WHICH LIGHTING IS SERVED, WITH THE PHOTOCELL LOCATED IN THE FIELD AS REQUIRED BY FIELD CONDITIONS. D. ALL LIGHTING AND POWER CONDUCTORS SHALL BE INSTALLED BETWEEN 24" (MINIMUM) AND 36" (MAXIMUM) BELOW FINISHED GRADE. E. ALL COMMUNICATIONS CONDUIT AND CABLES SHALL BE INSTALLED 36" (MINIMUM) BELOW FINISHED GRADE. F. ALL CONDUCTORS FOR POWER CIRCUITS SHALL BE #10 AWG (MINIMUM), UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE. G. ALL CONDUCTORS FOR EXTERIOR SITE LIGHTING CIRCUITS SHALL BE #6 AWG (MINIMUM), UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE. H. HANDHOLES SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE BASE OF ALL LIGHTING STANDARD ASSEMBLIES - TAP LIGHTING BRANCH CIRCUIT AT BASE, PROVIDE FUSES AT TAP, AND PROVIDE BRANCH CIRCUIT WIRING FROM BASE TO LIGHTING FIXTURES. ISSUE & REVISION PROGRESS SET: 11/26/18 CITY SUBMISSION: 2/15/19 COMM #1809 U c �T U Y O oa Q LOL0 W Cm zco W LL, q !E z �-- 3: O �)- W �Lf)�a� W N +' N 2 U-tU)cnH t r z E 0 Cn Q c o o c rn `� to N CO LO N N M M .E d M Op C N N co w �z, W0U _j Q U xOf O w z z U) LU LUO z . O U U -O LO LO '> oLr) (fl w O Z N U) a �m�m M O v .? P.� OU OQ U0� 0� F- - C 7 O L U) U) col T<U) O U LOLO LO d F Z) z M rUr0 Ooe �O U Q (n (D = `O LU LO HMM> O a_ N Q U (n>ON 7N 0 z_ J O Cl) J O J U) U) w_[L[Lo m d'(4Z) z 0 D z M o LU w l 0 - ` O z C7 w � a N HMO LLI U :3 UCY)U)U)l M N U) C w LO > Z M a� a co •� O "O 0: pIL N O a J c6 JLLI LL LS') C o t r z E 0 Cn Q c o o c rn `� to N CO LO N N M M .E d M Op C N N co w �z, W0U _j Q U xOf O w z z F_ I.L Z U z CQ c CW C LU O H C9 aoH x OQ �a a0¢¢ a t r z E 0 Cn Q c o o c rn `� to N CO LO N N M M .E d M Op C N N co w �z, W0U _j Q U xOf O w z z O C� ¢ U F- 10 E. z U�wZ aoH z200 Jlu a0¢¢ O T<U) O FIF= LU N ¢K ¢ F 6 rUr0 LLwoU LU w LL U <0= co W w X w_[L[Lo Q Q d'(4Z) z 0 SITE PLAN - PHOTOMETRIC PLAN E1 01 ©2019 Miller Hanson Architects FRENCHMAN PLACE 3RD ADDITION Found 1/2 Inch Open Iron Pipe North Line Outlot B, '- FRENCHMAN PLACE 1ST ADDITION Found Iron Pipe LS #23021 — — KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Rosemary Apartments, Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Washington, State of Minnesota, to ^0) wit: Outlot B. FRENCHMAN PLACE 1ST ADDITION Cb Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as FRENCHMAN PLACE 3RD ADDITION and do hereby dedicate to the 14) 04) public for public use forever the easements as created by this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. o� �O In witness whereof said Rosemary Apartments, Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 20. Found Iron Pipe LS #23021 I I — — — — N 88037'41"E 160.41 — N87030'30"W 1196.83 I SCALE: 1 INCH = 60 FEET I I C) 60 30 0 30 60 120 --------------= =Drainage & Utility Easement--___`__------------ O / , N I o I / ---, z ALE IN FEET 1 I / WET LAND -------------------- Orientation of this bearing system is based on the J E \ t� m / \` \ north line of Outlot B, FRENCHMAN PLACE 1ST ADDITION N C� "oo N\ \ 1 1 r� / ` _ , F 1 -- Edge of Wet Land which is assumed to bear N87030'30"W W Lu \ I --Edge of Wet Land---- / / Found Iron Pipe N89058'54"W 251.28 m /' N10°45'36" E 42 13 S%?/�_ \� LS #23021 \ r i WET LAND A C // 21 r` c \1\fin\ \VI I L- K II I c - _ \ I \ r r / Found Iron Pipe `-J O I N °hA �'\ 6Y 38 8"6 >I� \� \- 00 00 1 I / ---____—`— i _— 11 J vs.30 LU Ili \ T - 000 00 BLOCK 1 I - M o -o v Found Iron Pipe LS #23021 — — KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS: That Rosemary Apartments, Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, fee owner of the following described property situated in the County of Washington, State of Minnesota, to ^0) wit: Outlot B. FRENCHMAN PLACE 1ST ADDITION Cb Have caused the same to be surveyed and platted as FRENCHMAN PLACE 3RD ADDITION and do hereby dedicate to the 14) 04) public for public use forever the easements as created by this plat for drainage and utility purposes only. o� �O In witness whereof said Rosemary Apartments, Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, has caused these presents to be signed by its proper officer this day of 20. Found Iron Pipe LS #23021 g�1 59.67 _1' I NSP Transmission 0) \ 4p,, �� Line Easement per N81 °48' w � � �' I� Doc. No. 3537561 M M T S92 d� >g •° 3ti / Drainage &Utility Easemen-------- GJ 09 N w 0,-511,5" -- �___= LU \ \ \ - // WET LAND �� y \3r \ N 52A°�6 i / \ - Edge of Wet Land -- \ / �0 \ 1 O L / \ I NSP Transmission \\ / \ \ `J O .iQ 1 Line Easement per,, \ s Z a�3> (9 do 156.86 1 I / Doc. No. 3537562 ��\ y ! l y(0 / / ` / °� ' \1, 19°07'21 „ I I / — — 44.62 ��ti �Q. 00 _`7°18'06„ \\\ �s \\\ 5�5o N85009'52"W 262.43 I C8 ^ C-19 0330„ 1 IIV/� / 68o V S0 I- — ' A / L L l 4. / \ A / V 32°2 0 / j9\Q8„ Q, / i o�1 T \ 9e� F SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 21 CITY OF HUGO - WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA ROSEMARY APARTMENTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: Hugo Group LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, its General Partner Christopher J. Stokka, Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20, by Christopher J. Stokka, Chief Manager of Hugo Group LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, General Partner of Rosemary Apartments, Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of said limited partnership. Notary Public, My Commission Expires: Notary Printed Name County, Minnesota SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I Cody E. Johnson do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on the plat; that all monuments depicted on the plat have been or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, existing as of the date of this certification are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 Cody E. Johnson, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 54764 STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20, by Cody E. Johnson, Licensed Land Surveyor. Notary Public, My Commission Expires: Notary Printed Name County, Minnesota CITY OF HUGO CITY COUNCIL This plat of FRENCHMAN PLACE 3RD ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of Hugo, Minnesota this day of , 201, and hereby certifies compliance with all requirements as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. CITY OF HUGO By Mayor By Clerk WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR Pursuant to Chapter 820, Laws of Minnesota, 1971, and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subdivision 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of , 20. By Washington County Surveyor By WASHINGTON COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subdivision 9 and Section 272.12, taxes payable in the year on real estate hereinbefore described, have been paid; and there are no delinquent taxes, and transfer has been entered on this day of , 20. By Washington County Auditor/Treasurer WASHINGTON COUNTY RECORDER Document Number By Deputy I hereby certify that this instrument was recorded in the Office of the County Recorder for record on this day of 20, at o'clock—. M. and was duly recorded in Washington County Records. By By Washington County Recorder Deputy C0,70 0 0 N2 O\— — — — — N 88037'41"E 160.41 — SCALE: 1 INCH = 60 FEET C) 60 30 0 30 60 120 --------------= =Drainage & Utility Easement--___`__------------ O o P I o / ---, z ALE IN FEET -------------------- Orientation of this bearing system is based on the J E \ t� m / \` \ north line of Outlot B, FRENCHMAN PLACE 1ST ADDITION N C� "oo N\ \ 1 1 r� / ` _ , F ` \ - which is assumed to bear N87030'30"W W Lu \ I i -i- ` I I LJQo / m /' N10°45'36" E 42 13 S%?/�_ \� 1 -j C // 21 N K II c - _ \ \ 44 Found Iron Pipe \ \4li I N °hA �'\ 6Y 38 8"6 >I� \� LS #23021Lr) / vs.30 \ .\ v d \ \ rSl 1 0\ z 1 ;� / Std Denotes Found Iron Monument, Marked as Shown \ -,\ I \ I S86006'15"E G M \ \ \ oM 1 \ O Denotes 1/2 inch by 14 inch Rebar Set Marked "RLS 54764" S6So 4.04 43.77 _ N w b �� \ S>'0 (Plat=) Denotes a record dimension per plat of - - _ \ Drainage & Utility Easement 3'F �\ / S> o 10 �� '' 50 \ Found Iron Pipe FRENCHMAN PLACE 1ST ADDITION per Doc. No. 3519170 1 I Z 0 38,04 M It S214 -1 -- F 3 6 5 LS #23021 \ 1 S89°32'44"E — — �' I k/ 0200 � o ° rn E \�Sl ° Corner Falls in Water--- A \1J ' 0 3022"ly No Monument Found or Set 36 Not \ 80.00 / �� i %�� t`\22219I LOT 1 40 S13°x646 66 -� °�� / \ I i i00 J \ 1 ry Ul \� ^ I r NI 9 o O I 1 N. V 1 \/ // / Q L 12 70 10 \ I —I— fin L �N 2°, ss m° 30 \ �O CB�� X j `\I 1 i \\°per, �9 71701,�/ / / WET LAND N82024'S6"W ^o e of Wet Land--- `\ VICINITY MAP \ rSo9� 16 S9, Oi- CP S 4600 .13 (NOT TO SCALE) g�1 59.67 _1' I NSP Transmission 0) \ 4p,, �� Line Easement per N81 °48' w � � �' I� Doc. No. 3537561 M M T S92 d� >g •° 3ti / Drainage &Utility Easemen-------- GJ 09 N w 0,-511,5" -- �___= LU \ \ \ - // WET LAND �� y \3r \ N 52A°�6 i / \ - Edge of Wet Land -- \ / �0 \ 1 O L / \ I NSP Transmission \\ / \ \ `J O .iQ 1 Line Easement per,, \ s Z a�3> (9 do 156.86 1 I / Doc. No. 3537562 ��\ y ! l y(0 / / ` / °� ' \1, 19°07'21 „ I I / — — 44.62 ��ti �Q. 00 _`7°18'06„ \\\ �s \\\ 5�5o N85009'52"W 262.43 I C8 ^ C-19 0330„ 1 IIV/� / 68o V S0 I- — ' A / L L l 4. / \ A / V 32°2 0 / j9\Q8„ Q, / i o�1 T \ 9e� F SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 31, RANGE 21 CITY OF HUGO - WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA ROSEMARY APARTMENTS, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP By: Hugo Group LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, its General Partner Christopher J. Stokka, Chief Manager STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20, by Christopher J. Stokka, Chief Manager of Hugo Group LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company, General Partner of Rosemary Apartments, Limited Partnership, a Minnesota limited partnership, on behalf of said limited partnership. Notary Public, My Commission Expires: Notary Printed Name County, Minnesota SURVEYORS CERTIFICATE I Cody E. Johnson do hereby certify that this plat was prepared by me or under my direct supervision; that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor in the State of Minnesota; that this plat is a correct representation of the boundary survey; that all mathematical data and labels are correctly designated on the plat; that all monuments depicted on the plat have been or will be correctly set within one year; that all water boundaries and wet lands, as defined in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.01, Subd. 3, existing as of the date of this certification are shown and labeled on this plat; and all public ways are shown and labeled on this plat. Dated this day of , 20 Cody E. Johnson, Licensed Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 54764 STATE OF MINNESOTA, COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 20, by Cody E. Johnson, Licensed Land Surveyor. Notary Public, My Commission Expires: Notary Printed Name County, Minnesota CITY OF HUGO CITY COUNCIL This plat of FRENCHMAN PLACE 3RD ADDITION was approved and accepted by the City Council of Hugo, Minnesota this day of , 201, and hereby certifies compliance with all requirements as set forth in Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subdivision 2. CITY OF HUGO By Mayor By Clerk WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYOR Pursuant to Chapter 820, Laws of Minnesota, 1971, and in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subdivision 11, this plat has been reviewed and approved this day of , 20. By Washington County Surveyor By WASHINGTON COUNTY AUDITOR/TREASURER Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.021, Subdivision 9 and Section 272.12, taxes payable in the year on real estate hereinbefore described, have been paid; and there are no delinquent taxes, and transfer has been entered on this day of , 20. By Washington County Auditor/Treasurer WASHINGTON COUNTY RECORDER Document Number By Deputy I hereby certify that this instrument was recorded in the Office of the County Recorder for record on this day of 20, at o'clock—. M. and was duly recorded in Washington County Records. By By Washington County Recorder Deputy C0,70 0 0 N2 r AGENDA E.1 CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Hugo Planning Commission FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: The Meadows at Hugo — Golden Valley Land Company — Sketch Plan DATE: March 22, 2019, for the Planning Commission Meeting of March 28, 2019 REVIEW DEADLINE (120 -days): May 29, 2019 1. BACKGROUND: The property is generally located north of 1591h Street and east of the north City water tower. This property is just east of the approximately 40 acre park area that was dedicated with the Oneka Place development. The property is currently vacant, relatively flat, and has some site constraints due to wetlands, floodplain, shoreland and a ditch. The applicant would like to receive feedback on the project in regards to general layout, housing types, wetland replacement, and road connections. 2. SKETCH PLAN: Golden Valley Land Company is planning to develop a parcel of land that is 33.41 acres, with 6.1 acres of wetland. The plan shows 84 proposed lots, 70 villa lots and 14 single family homes along the ditch. The plan also shows stormwater ponding areas, trail connections, and road connections. A home owners association is proposed for the development. The sketch plan was completed to get comments from the various commissions and Council prior to moving forward with the formal development approval process. The plan shows the extension of Farnham Avenue, through a piece of City owned property, to access the parcel. The number of lots does not include the 10 lots shaded north of the water tower along Farnham Avenue. Staff will discuss this in more detail further in the staff report. Current Zoning The proposed parcel is located in the Future Urban Service (FUS) zoning district. The applicant intends to request flexibility on lot sizes and setbacks for the 50 foot wide villa lots The Meadows at Hugo Sketch Plan 2030 Comprehensive Plan The parcel is guided as Medium Density Residential (MD) according to the 2030 Land Use Plan. The density standards for the Medium Density Residential (MD) designation is a minimum of three units per acre. The developer is proposing a residential gross density of 2.5 units per acre and a net density of 3.06 units per acre. The development currently meets the density requirements for the land use designation. Planned Unit Development The developer has proposed requesting approval of a PUD for the development. PUD's offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of zoning district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater variety of uses, internal transfers of density, construction phasing and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of other, more standard zoning districts. The developer will be asking for flexibility on the following: • Lot widths o The developer is proposing two lot widths for the different product types being offered in the development, 50 foot and 80 foot. Flexibility is requested below: Product Lot Width Number of Lots Villas 50 feet 70 • Setbacks for the 50 foot wide Villa lots o The developer is proposing a side yard setback of 5 feet where 10 feet is required by ordinance. All other setbacks are proposed to comply with the zoning regulations. In exchange for the proposed PUD, the developer is expected to have a higher quality development with valued amenities. The developer has proposed the following: • A variety of housing product types. • The extension of the trail system through the development and off-street trail connections to the park to the west. • The developer has stated that they will evaluate the site to preserve to the maximum extent possible the sites natural features (wetland, floodplain, shoreland, etc). • Installation of a water re -use system for irrigation. The Medium Density Residential designation's primary intent is to respond to a need for smaller homes on smaller lots. This designation offers the opportunity for housing that may expand opportunities for more affordable single family home living and changes in demographics, The Meadows at Hugo Sketch Plan including smaller homes for empty nesters and smaller families. The medium density designation also describes the importance of preserving natural resources and amenities. The proposed sketch plan is requesting flexibility to accommodate smaller lot sizes and setbacks, a variety of housing products, and preservation of natural resources. This is in line with the intent of the land use present in the development. Staff will continue to work with the developer on their proposal to request a change in the zoning to Planned Unit Development as the project moves forward. A builder for the development has not been identified. It is unclear what the elevation of the homes would be and how they would sit on the lots. Staff is comfortable with the lot sizes, however recommends that the 5 foot side yard setback be further evaluated with as the project moves forward and home elevations and building footprints are provided. Because its proximity to the ditch, the property is in the Shoreland Overlay district. The development will need to meet all of the MN DNR shoreland standards as they relate to PUD approvals. Housing Types/Design The developer is proposing two different sizes of lots for the Villa and single family products, 50 foot wide lots and 80 foot wide lots. The applicant did not provide building elevations or material samples at this time. Although the applicant stated that the Villas/detached townhomes would be maintenance provided, they did not submit details about association maintenance with this application. These items would need to be reviewed as part of the preliminary plat application. Streets & Access The developer is showing access to the site from Farnham Avenue. The developer is also showing one connection to the properties to the north. Staff recommends two street connections to the north. The developer understands that 165th Street will be upgraded in the future with development and has requested that they not be assessed for any future street and utility improvements. Per City policy, all streets and utilities, when needed for a development, are constructed and paid for by the developer. Alternatively, property owners could petition the City to build the road, with or without assessments. If assessment allocated, they would be to the properties that would benefit from the improvement. Staff recommends that this be evaluated at the time 165th Street is improved, but does not recommended exempting properties from an assessment. With the approval of the Oneka Place development to the west the City acquired a large park area. Per evaluation and recommendations from the Parks Commission and Planning Commission the park area was divided into two outlots (Outlots K and L, of the preliminary plat of Oneka Place). The developer is proposing to provide access to the site via connection to Farnham Avenue, through the City owned property (Outlot L). Outlot L was not dedicated to satisfy park dedication requirements. This was to allow the opportunity for the possible extension of Farnham Avenue for access to the park and/or access to the parcel to the east proposed to be developed with this The Meadows at Hugo Sketch Plan application. Further is was recommend that the street be constructed at the developer's expense, if access was needed for the development of the property to the east. The developer is also proposing that the City construct the public street and utilities through the City property (Outlot L) to the east for access for the development. Alternatively, they are proposing to construct the public street at the developer's expense, if they can develop the 10 lots as shown on the north side of the road in the sketch plan. Staff recommends that the Commission offer to make the land available for construction of the street at the developer's expense, but not allow the development of the lots as shown on the plan. The intersection at 159th Street and Farnham Avevue would remain with no stop controls at 159th Street and a stop condition on Farnham Avenue from the north and south. Further evaluation of any minor intersection modifications would be evaluated during the preliminary plat phase. Parks Commission Update: The developer's proposal was evaluated by the Parks Commission at its March 20, 2019, meeting. The Parks Commission has not yet planned the future park. They discussed that during the approval of the Oneka Place development there was concern over the lack of parking for the future park and the possibility of a parking lot off of Farnham Avenue North. The future park was discussed as being passive with trails, at least in the short-term. There was not a strong interest in active park features such as a playground or ball fields in the near future. Additional planning and discussion is needed for the park, but they did not expect that to happen this year. Since there is not plan for the park, The Park Commission recommended making the land available for construction of the street at the developer's expense, but not allow the development of the lots as shown on the plan. They discussed wanting to keep their options open for a parking lot to be constructed for the park or if any active amenities were desired. Utilities As identified in the City's Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan, a 24" trunk watermain will need to be extended north from the water tower location. The 24" water main should be extended north through the development with the City paying for oversizing costs. The City's Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan identifies the way in which properties are to be served by sanitary sewer. A sanitary sewer connection to the Met Council Interceptor is identified at 165th Street with a 33" trunk main. The proposed sketch plan identifies a connection to the Interceptor approximately 1320 feet south of 165th Street. Oversizing of the trunk main would be the responsibility of the City of Hugo. While the proposed sewer connection is different than what is shown on the Comprehensive Plan, it does propose an alternative was to serve the development and other properties due to the difficulties of the sanitary sewer planned to be available from the north and watermain being available from south. Staff does feel this is a reasonable option, however, drainage and utility easements will be required in order to allow the sanitary sewer to be constructed out to 165th The Meadows at Hugo Sketch Plan Street in the future. The proposed location change will still allow the surrounding properties to be served with sanitary sewer, but in a different way than assumed by the Comprehensive Plan. Further, a Comprehensive Plan amendment would need to be approved for the change in location of the connection to the Met Council Interceptor. The sketch utility plan proposed by the developer currently shows a portion of the sewer flowing to the south and west. The proposed sanitary sewer would need to be directed to the new trunk main proposed with the development. Parks / Trails According to the Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan, the property is in neighborhood park service area 3. There are no existing parks in the area besides the park land that was recently dedicated with Oneka Place which is adjacent to the development. Currently, there is not a plan for the park but a passive trail system has been discussed. Frog Hollow, in neighborhood park service area 4, is to the south of the property and may be considered to be within walking distance. The Trail Plan shows an existing trail extending from Farnham Avenue North through the northeast corner of the property. The entire property is shown as a part of the greenway corridor that follows the ditch. The developer has indicated that they would extend the City's trail system through the subdivision and make connections to the trails in the future park. The developer is required to dedicate land, pay a fee, or a combination of land and fee. At this time, the developer has not indicated how they propose to satisfy the park dedication requirement, but it is assumed that they will pay the fee because they are not showing a land dedication. The park dedication section of the City Code requires the applicant dedicate 10% of the developable acres for park land with a density of up to 3.99 units per acre. The developer has indicated that there are 27.31 acres of buildable land in the development. Therefore, the developer would be required to dedicate 2.73 acres of park land. The current park dedication fee is $2,400 per unit. If a fee is preferable, with 84 units, the park dedication fee would be $201,600. Parks Commission Update: The developer's proposal was evaluated by the Parks Commission at it March 20, 2019, meeting. The Commission liked the trail through the development and the proposed off street trails that will connect to the future park to the west. The Commission agreed that the existing parks are sufficient to serve the development and recommended the developer pay the fee to satisfy the park dedication requirements. Landscaping The developer has not submitted a landscape plan. In exchange for PUD flexibility, the City could expect a landscape plan that goes beyond the minimum requirements to provide street trees, entrance streetscaping, plantings around any monument sign, plantings in openspace, etc. The Meadows at Hugo Sketch Plan Wetlands The City's Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) has approved the wetland delineation for the property. The sketch plan shows a number of impacts to wetlands that appear to be avoidable. The developer has stated that they will evaluate the site to preserve to the maximum extent possible the sites natural features (wetland, floodplain, shoreland, etc) as part of the PUD request. A wetland replacement plan would need to be applied and approved by the TEP if the developer plans to impact any wetlands on the site. This will be evaluated as the project moves forward. Stormwater Management/Water Re -Use The developer is proposing to have a stormwater management plan through the construction of ponds within the site. Staff will be working with the developer, as this projects moves forward, as it relates to stormwater management, floodplain, and infiltration. The developer has also indicated that they will be using stormwater for irrigation purposes within the development. If the system is feasible, from a water availability and design standpoint, it will require additional review and analysis as the project moves forward. 5. CONCLUSION/ RECOMMENDATIONS: The developer has been working with staff to develop a basic sketch plan for informal comments. The development currently meets the density requirements for the land use designation. The developer is requesting flexibly on lot sizes and setbacks. Although the applicant has done a good job providing various lot sizes, openspace and trail connections, and proposes a stormwater reuse system to irrigate the development, it is in staff's opinion that that the layout of the proposed development should be revised based on Staff comments and the comments from the Commissions. Staff recommends the following: 1. Staff recommends that the Commission offer to make the City property available for construction of the street to access the site at the developer's expense, but not allow the development of the lots as shown on the plan. 2. Although the location change to the trunk sanitary sewer connection to the Met Council interceptor requires evaluation and approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, staff believes this to be a reasonable alternative to serving the surrounding area. Provided that the utilities are extended to the east property line and easements are dedicated for future extension of the utilities to 165th Street. 3. Staff recommend the applicant plan the development to reduce the impacts to the natural environment. Such as, reducing the amount of wetlands to be impacted with the development. 4. Staff recommends that assessments be evaluated at the time 165th Street is improved, if necessary, but does not recommended exempting properties from an assessment. 5. Staff is comfortable with the lot sizes, however recommends that the 5 foot side yard setback be further evaluated with as the project moves forward and home elevations and building footprints are provided. The Meadows at Hugo Sketch Plan 6. Staff recommends that the landscape plan is designed to go beyond the minimum requirements to provide street trees, entrance streetscaping, plantings around any monument sign, plantings in openspace, etc. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission provide feedback on the concept plan to the developer on the following: 1. Construction of the public street though the City owned property. 2. Revised trunk sanitary sewer connection location to the Met Council interceptor. 3. Overall development layout. 4. Wetland impacts 5. Lots sizes and setbacks. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Map 2. Engineer's Memo dated March 22, 2019 3. Applicant Narrative dated February 28, 2019 4. Concept Plan 5. Utility Plan 6. Approved Oneka Place Preliminary Plat 0 7. 0 0 0 Z W CO U) 0 00 00ID 0 N W U) W W W 00 wsb March 21, 2019 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Meadows at Hugo Sketch Plan Review WSB Project No. 013597-000 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the Sketch Plan for the Meadows at Hugo. We have reviewed the following information related to this application: • The Meadows at Hugo Sketch Plan dated January 25, 2019 by Civil Site Group • The Meadows at Hugo Sketch Utility Plan dated January 25, 2019 by Civil Site Group • The Meadows at Hugo sketch plan PUD Narrative dated February 28, 2019 Based on the review of the documents, we offer the following comments related to this application: General/Access 1. The subject property is located north of 159th Street, south of 165th Street and east of Water Tower No. 3. The parcel doesn't have any public roadway frontage at this time, however with the Oneka Place Development, the City had received Outllot L that would allow for access to the subject property. 2. Park planning associated with Outlot L has yet to be developed and at this time the City is not able to commit to selling any land for lots (as shown on the sketch plan). Staff has indicated access to the proposed development could come from the Farnham Avenue stub roadway on the north side of 159th Street and extend through Outlot L. The extension of the roadway would be the developer's responsibility. The intersection at this location would remain with no stop controls at 159th Street and a stop condition on Farnham Avenue from the north and south. Further evaluation of any minor intersection modifications would be evaluated during the preliminary plat phase. 3. With access proposed from Farnham Avenue, the proposed sketch plan does show a future roadway connection to the north, which will ultimately connect with 165th Street. There are two parcels to the north (same ownership), however connection to both parcels should be further evaluated. Staff concurs with not providing access to the property to the east as it is guided industrial. 4. Development of properties in this area has been challenging as watermain needs to be extended from the south and sanitary sewer from the north. The extension of these utilities need to span across multiple properties, creating difficult development scenarios. 165th Street will also require improvements with added development access, changing from a rural gravel roadway to an urban paved roadway. S:\Users\R_Juba\Rachel\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\The Meadows at Hugo\Sketch Plan\The Meadows Engineer Momo 032219.docx Ms. Rachel Juba March 21, 2019 Page 2 Utility Plan 5. As identified in the City's Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan, a 24" trunk watermain will need to be extended north from the water tower location. The 24" water main should be extended north through the development with the City of Hugo paying for oversizing costs. 6. The City's Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan identifies the way in which properties are to be served by sanitary sewer. A sanitary sewer connection to the MCES Interceptor is identified at 165th Street with a 33" trunk main. The proposed sketch plan identifies a connection to the MCES Interceptor approximately 1320 feet south of 165th Street. 7. While the proposed sewer connection is different than what is shown on the comprehensive plan, it does allow for properties to develop easier/faster due to the difficulties of the sanitary sewer and watermain being available from the north and south, respectively. Staff does feel this is a viable option, however, assurances via drainage and utility easements that would allow the sanitary sewer to be constructed out to 165th Street in the future would be required. 8. Staff recommends a Comprehensive Plan amendment for the change in location of the connection to the MES Interceptor. 9. The proposed sanitary sewer would need to be directed to the new trunk main. The sketch utility plan currently shows a portion of the sewer flowing to the south and west. Oversizing of the trunk main would be the responsibility of the City of Hugo. Stormwater Management/Wetlands 10. Volume control/water quality standard will be required, which is 1.1 inches off new impervious surfaces. Water reuse will be the preferred BMP option for the site for volume reduction. If an additional BMP is to be used, the TP removal factor from RCWD Rule C, Table C1. must be applied. 11. Peak stormwater runoff rates for the proposed project must not exceed existing rates for the 2 -year and 10 -year 24-hour rainfall events using Atlas 14 rainfall depths. 12. Peak stormwater runoff rates for the 100 -year 24-hour rainfall event is limited to 0.1 cfs/acre. 13. Lowest building opening must be at least 3' above the 100 -yr HWL for both wetlands and BMPs and 4' above the current groundwater elevations. 14. Private ditches to JD3 are located onsite. Maintain private ditch drainage to JD3. Developer to confirm with RCWD if a permit for Rule I is needed. 15. No 100 -year floodplains located onsite. 16. Stormwater Management facilities will be required to be within drainage and utility easements. 17. The applicant is proposing to utilize stormwater reuse as part of their stormwater management plan. 18. A wetland delineation on the parcel was approved during the fall of 2018. 19. The concept plan shows a number of impacts to wetlands that appear to be avoidable. The applicant may find it helpful to have a pre -application meeting with the Technical Evaluation Panel to get a better idea of what impacts may or may not be allowed. A number of the wetland impacts are to linear wetlands that may provide hydrology to other wetlands which should also be a consideration with proposed impacts. S:\Users\R_Juba\Rachel\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\The Meadows at Hugo\Sketch Plan\The Meadows Engineer Momo 032219.docx Ms. Rachel Juba March 21, 2019 Page 3 Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463. Sincerely, WSB Mark Erichson, PE City Engineer cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) Peter Knaeble, Golden Valley Land Co. (email only) S:\Users\R_Juba\Rachel\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\The Meadows at Hugo\Sketch Plan\The Meadows Engineer Momo 032219.docx The Meadows at Hugo Sketch Plan PUD Narrative 2/28/19 Over the past couple of months, we have coordinated with City staff in designing the Meadows at Hugo PUD project. Prior to the current submittal, we reviewed several alternatives which were determined non -feasible or less preferential. We're pleased to submit the Meadows at Hugo PUD Sketch Plan for your consideration. The development site is 33.41 acres (gross) and has 6.10 of delineated wetlands, for a net area of 27.31 acres. The current site is used as agricultural land. The site is bordered on the west by City undeveloped park property, on the north by undeveloped agricultural land, on the east by County Ditch #3 and undeveloped agricultural land, and on the south by a single family subdivision. The property is currently zoned Future Urban Service (FES), and is guided in the City's 2030 and 2040 Comprehensive Plans as Medium Density Residential (MD). We are proposing a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for this project. Our Sketch Plan shows a total of 84 single family lots consisting of two different lot sizes and housing types. 70 lots will be for villa homes on 50' x 140' (7000 sf) lots. We are proposing 30' front setbacks, 30' rear setbacks, and 5' side setbacks for these villa lots. In the Shoreland Overlay District (300' from County Ditch #3) we are showing 14 single family lots at 80' x 170'. These lots will meet all Shoreland Overlay District single family lot standards. Our proposed PUD maintains a significant amount of wetland area, natural environmental features, and public open space. We will be designing an internal trail system that will connect to the future trails in the City park property to the west. We plan on providing a stormwater reuse system as part of our stormwater management plan. Our PUD will connect to Farham Ave. N. to the southwest with a public road through the City property. The Sketch Plan also shows a future street connection to the north, that will ultimately connect to 165th St. N. We are not showing a street connection to the east as this property is zoned Business Park (BP) and guided as Industrial (IND). Our development plan will provide several benefits over the existing vacant condition including: 1. An efficient use of land for single family residential construction that enables greater community engagement and interaction. 2. A variety of product types appealing to different home buyers and enhancing visual interest of the proposed neighborhoods. 3. Open space that promotes outdoor engagement and visual connectivity between residential units and their surroundings. 4. The extension of the City's trail system thru the subdivision. 5. The design of a new stormwater reuse system for this development. These design details all demonstrate our commitment to providing a high-quality development worthy of receiving the PUD designation. The creation of non-standard setbacks and lot sizes for the villa lots requires the PUD zoning designation, which is the primary reason for our PUD request. The proposed PUD subdivision creates a variety of different lot types allowing for a diverse type of housing. Thus, the proposed subdivision facilitates the mixed-use development goals sought after in the PUD Planned Unit Development zoning standards. In addition, the proposed PUD will preserve to the maximum extent possible the site's natural environmental features, provide for trail connections to the City park, and utilize a unique stormwater reuse system for site irrigation. As part of our Sketch Plan review process by the City Park Commission, Planning Commission, and City Council, we would like clarification/approval for the following issues: 1. Public street through City property to the southwest. We would propose that the City construct the public street and utilities through the City property to our west property line at the City's expense. As an alternative, we would propose to construct this public street at our expense, if we could develop single family lots along the north side of the street as shown on the Sketch Plan. 2. Connection to interceptor sewer. As shown on our Sketch Utility Plan, we are proposing to connect to the Metropolitan Council's interceptor sewer at our northwest property corner. We would then extend the City's 33" trunk sanitary sewer line to our northeast property corner. This would require an update to the City's 2030 and 2040 Comp Plans. 3. Overall street layout. We are proposing a single entrance to our project from Farnham Ave. N. to the southwest, with a future street connection to the north and no future street connection to the industrial guided property to the east. 4. Wetland fill and mitigation. We will be requesting a preliminary TEP panel to approve our approximately 2.4 acres of wetland fill and mitigation. This wetland fill is necessary due to the unique shape of the existing wetlands and our goal to meet the City's minimum residential density of 3.0 units/acre. 5. Future assessments for 165th St. N. improvements. We understand that the City is interested in future upgrades to 165th St. N. We are requesting that this development will not be assessed for any future street and utility improvements to 165th St. N. 6. Villa lot design standards. We are proposing developing approximately 70 villa style single family lots. These lots will be 50 feet wide with 5 foot side setbacks. These villa lots will also be maintained under a homeowner's association. Civi;a-�#e G R O V P THE MEADOWS AT HUGO HUGO, MINNESOTA SITE DATA Gross Site Area: 33.41 Ac. Existing Wetland Area: 6.10 Ac. Net Developable Area: 27.31 Ac. (Lots & Local Roads, Ponds) Existing Wetland Area: 6.10 Ac. Wetland Removed: 2.41 Ac. (40%) Wetland Saved: 3.69 Ac. (60%) Shoreland Overlay District: 300' from ditch Min. Lot width: 80' Structure setback from ditch: 100' Min. Lot size: 10,400 sf Max. hardcover 25% Building FFE: 4' above OHW Overall Residential Units: 83 lots (3.04 u/a) Villa SF lots 80'x 170' 14 lots Villa SF lots 50'x 140' 70 lots Setbacks: 80' lots 50' lots 30' front 30' front 30' rear 30' rear 21'side 5'side *All areas approximate. Developable area estimated from County GIS topography as measured against local codes. SKETCH PLAN #18301 01.25.2019 Q 1 = 100'-0" 50'-0" 0 1001-0" NORTH 1Y I 1Y NEW 33" SANITARY SEWER c Y f i WET EL. 914-916 , ' fff Y � f• J !Tj J 8 S IY1 TORMWA TREATMEP II .. STORM SEWER j 8" SAN. SEWER 8" WATERMAIN---' r NX 1 J WET Y EL. 914-915 II Ivl (STORM SEWER v v 18" SAN. SEWER v WET " WATERMAI EL. 914-915 8" SAN. SEWER v� 1 8" WATERMAIN 1 0� 5TO RM WATE� TREATMENT 1 'STORM SEWER 8" SAN. SEWER 8" WATERMAIN N i �i L WET EL. 914-915 NEW 33" SANITARY SEWER �f c STORM SEWER POND 8" SAN. SEWER f EL. 912 J I 8" WATERMAIN -- I STORM SEWER ! r 8" SAN. SEWER 1 -8" WATERMAIN f�f f 11f WET WET EL. 914 EL. 914 l 1 I r�l. 1 .� POND EL. 914 E.O.F. EL. 914.5 tf f STORM SEWER � it PONS; , �L. 91 STORM SEWER 8" SAN. SEWER �.8" WATERMAIN / STORM SEWER STORM SEWER 8" SAN. SEWER -- 8" WATERMAIN � I � I I � I J 1" = 100'-0" 50'-0" 0 100'-0" NORTH Civilsite THE MEADOWS AT HUGO G R O U p HUGQ MINNESOTA *All areas approximate. Developable area estimated from County GIS topography as measured against local codes. SKETCH UTILITY PLAN #18301 01.25.2019 c 2017 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. a Property Description Parcel A: South One—Half of the Southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 31 North of Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota. EXCEPTING: The South 225 feet of the East 350 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southeast Quarter of Section 7, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota. Abstract Property Parcel B: South One—Half of the Southwest Quarter (S 1/2 of SW 1/4) of Section Number Seven (7), in Township Number Thirty—one (31) North, of Range Twenty—one (21) West, and containing according to the United States Survey, eighty—three and seventy one—hundredths (8370) acres, Washington County, Minnesota. EXCEPTING. The Southwest Quarter (SW 1/4 of Southwest 1/4 ) of Section Number Seven (7), in Township Number Thirty—one (31) North, of Range Number Twenty—one (21), and containing forty—three and seventy one—hundredths (4370) acres, more or less, Washington County, Minnesota. ALSO EXCEPTING: The South 225 feet of the East 350 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota. Torrens Property Parcel C.- The .The South 225 feet of the East 350 feet of the Southeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 7, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota. Torrens Property FA Development Data Proposed Zoning: PUD Gross Site Area: 117.5± ac. Major Road Right of Wa,>r 2.5± ac. Oneka Parkway North 2.5± ac. Existing Wetlands: 25.0± ac. Net Developable Area: 90.0± ac. Proposed Residential Lots: 171 lots 65' Single Family 105 lots 70' Single Family 66 lots Overall Gross Density 1.46 unfac (171 un / 117.5 ac Gross Area — Future Development Parcels) Overall Net Density 1.90 un, oc (171 un / 90 ac Net Developable Area) Project Street R/W: 10.7 ± ac. S87°53'33 "E 2633.54 Project O�pace: 61.57± ac. Ownership: Use: Minimum Lot Area Outlot A 5.63± ac. City Open Space/Ponding Outlot B 1.57± ac. City Open Space/Ponding Outlot C 2.75± ac. City Open Space/Ponding Outlot D 389± ac. City Open Space/Ponding Outlot E 1.14± ac. City Open Space/Ponding Outlot FIG 0.96± ac. City Open Space/Ponding Ou tl o t H/I 1.20± ac. City Op en Sp ace/Pon din g Outlot J 1.41± ac. City Open Space/Ponding Outlot K 38.48± ac. City Open Space/Ponding Outlot L 4.54± ac. City Open Space/Ponding Proposed Lot Standards: 65' SF 70' SF I I \ NO TE.• The lot dimensions and areas on this plan are approximate. Refer to the Final Plat and supporting data for exact lot dimensions and areas. Wetland delineation provided by Earth Science Associates, Inc. Wetland delineation report dated July 2017 and amended December 14, 2017. Lot Width @ setback (min.) 65' 70' Lot Depth (min.) 130' 130' Minimum Lot Area 8,600 sf 9,563 sf Average Lot Area 10,419 sf 11,680 sf Maximum Lot Imp. Coverage 50% 50% Maximum Building Heigh t 35' 35' Front Setback — House 25' 25' Front Setback — Garage Face 25' 25' Side Setback 7.5'/7.5' (15' total) 7.5'17.5' (15' total) Side Setback — corner lot 25' 25' Rear Setback 30' 30' Oneka Place Minnesota Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 Typical SF Lot Detail (No Scale) 74 o 0\�5 7.° .N � N 8,880 sf \ 7.5 . r L N N 74 STREET Drainage & Utility Easement Setback Line ttttttttttt/��i i Lot Number Lot Area NO TE. - Lot width varies from 55, 65' & 70' 1 1 0' 150' 300' 450' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Latest Revision Date: 03/19/18 0008260PPPOl —H.dwg Date: 02/05/18 sheet 3 of 16 Overall Preliminary Plat I hereby certify that this plan was prepared me or under Revieione Prepared for: Westwood AL direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR under the laws of the State of Minnesota 02/16/18 Revised per Client Request City Comments Dom; CTY CPDC-Pratt-Oakwood LLC Partnershi03/19/18 Checked: � Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Drawn: CTY 3500 Willow Lek Blvd. Suite 100 Craig W. Morse Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 03/19/18 23021 Record Drawing by/dabs Vadnais Heights, MN 55110 Date iicenee Na Oneka Place Minnesota Call 48 Hours before digging: GOPHER STATE ONE CALL Twin City Area 651-454-0002 Mn. Toll Free 1-800-252-1166 Typical SF Lot Detail (No Scale) 74 o 0\�5 7.° .N � N 8,880 sf \ 7.5 . r L N N 74 STREET Drainage & Utility Easement Setback Line ttttttttttt/��i i Lot Number Lot Area NO TE. - Lot width varies from 55, 65' & 70' 1 1 0' 150' 300' 450' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Latest Revision Date: 03/19/18 0008260PPPOl —H.dwg Date: 02/05/18 sheet 3 of 16 Overall Preliminary Plat