HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Packet 11.21.19AGENDA
HUGO PLANNING COMMISSION
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2019
HUGO CITY HALL
7:00 p.m.
A. ROLL CALL (Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Luchsinger, Mulvihill, Tjernlund)
B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. October 10, 2019
D. PUBLIC HEARING
1. ISD #624 White Bear Lake Area Schools — Sketch plan review and conditional use permit.
E. NEW BUSINESS
F. OLD BUSINESS
G. ADJOURNMENT
If you need accommodations for the Planning Commission meeting please contact
Rachel Juba at (651) 762-6304 or riuba(&ci.hugo.mn.us, thank you.
Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of Thursdav, October 10, 2019
Vice Chair Arcand called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
PRESENT: Arcand, Derr, Lessard, Luchsinger Mulvihill, Tjernlund.
ABSENT: Fry, Kleissler.
STAFF: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director
Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant
Pledge of Allegiance.
Approval of Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of September 12, 2019
Commissioner Derr made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Tjernlund to approve minutes for the
meeting of September 12, 2019.
All ayes.
Motion carried.
Public Hearing: LaMacchia Group, Heartland Credit Union — Site Plan and PUD Amendment
Staff provided background on the site plan and PUD amendment applications submitted by LaMacchia
Group for a Heartland Credit Union Bank. The proposed site is located within the Victor Gardens North
Village development and is on the corner of Victor Hugo Boulevard North and Frenchman Road. The
property is zoned PUD and is labeled as commercial in the 2030 Land Use Plan.
The applicant is requesting approval for a PUD amendment in the Victor Gardens development. Staff
finds that the application is consistent with the Victor Gardens PUD general plan and meets the criteria
outlined in the Victor Gardens North Village 4th Addition conditions.
Staff used the standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements to
evaluate the site plan. Staff provided details on the parking, lighting, and landscaping plans submitted by
the applicant. Staff also determined that the architecture and building materials proposed for the building
will be cohesive with the existing buildings within the development and stated that the applicant has done
a good job in complying with the spirit and intent of the Victor Gardens PUD general plan. Staff presented
conditions listed in the resolution, which the applicant will be required to meet before applying for a
building permit.
Staff stated that the proposed site plan and PUD amendment are consistent with the standards outlined in
the Comprehensive Plan, City Ordinances, and Victor Gardens PUD general plan. Staff recommended
approval of the site plan and PUD amendment, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution. Staff also
recommended the Planning Commission open the public hearing and take any public comment.
The Planning Commission invited Tim Niemiec, the LaMacchia Group representative, forward to address
any comments or questions.
October 10, 2019 PC Minutes
Page 2
Tim Niemiec, 1824 E Van Beck Avenue, Saint Francis, Wisconsin 55235, addressed the Planning
Commission and is the lead designer on the Heartland Credit Union project and has previous experience
designing banks and credit unions.
Commissioner Tjernlund asked the applicant to locate the rooftop mechanical equipment on the building.
Niemiec stated that the mansard styled roof is deigned to create a six foot ledge along the roof to screen
any equipment. The equipment is shown in a birds eye view rendering of the building.
Commissioner Mulvihill asked to see the materials board. Juba stated that the materials are consistent with
the materials of the Victor Gardens Development and colors and styles are very close.
Vice Chair Arcand opened the public hearing at 7:12pm.
No one was in the audience and no one spoke.
Vice Chair Arcand closed the public hearing at 7:12pm.
Commissioner Derr stated that the lot has been vacant for a long time and the bank will be a good use of
that space. Lessard agreed with Arcand that the building is well designed.
Commissioner Tjernlund made a motion to approve the site plan and variance request for LaMacchia
Group, Heartland Credit Union, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution. Motion seconded by
Lessard.
All Ayes. Motion carried.
Adiournment
Commissioner Lessard made a motion, Tjernlund seconded, to adjourn at 7:15 pm.
All Ayes. Motion carried.
Respectfully Submitted,
Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant
Agenda Number D.1
CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING
APPLICATION STAFF REPORT
TO: Hugo Planning Commission
FROM: Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant
SUBJECT: ISD #624 White Bear Lake Area Schools. Sketch Plan Review and
Conditional Use Permit for exterior storage for a property located at
13XXX Fenway Boulevard North.
DATE: November 14, for the Planning Commission Meeting of November 21, 2019
ZONING: General Industrial District (I-3)
REVIEW DEADLINE: December 7, 2019
1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
ISD #624 White Bear Lake Area Schools has applied for a sketch plan review of a potential
transportation and maintenance facility located on Fenway Boulevard, north of 130th Street N.
The school district is also requesting approval of a conditional use permit for exterior storage
exceeding the size of the principal building on site. The proposed sketch plan shows the building
square footage totaling approximately 15,000 square feet and the exterior storage area totaling
approximately 46,000 square feet, including the drive aisles. The applicant is looking for the
Planning Commission to provide comments on the sketch plan.
The applicant's next steps would include submitting a formal application for site plan approval.
At the time the application is submitted, staff will provide a more detailed review of the site plan
in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements.
2. CONTEXT:
A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning
The property is guided for Industrial in the 2040 Land Use Plan. The properties to the north, east,
and south are zoned General Industrial District (I-3) and are occupied by industrial users. To the
west of the property is zoned PUD and is the Creekview residential development.
Sketch Plan Review and Exterior Storage CUP
Page 2
B. Natural Characteristics of Site
The property is currently vacant and consists of a mixture of open and wooded land. The site has
a general slope downward from east to west.
C. BACKGROUND
The proposed use of the property will be a transportation facility for the White Bear Lake Area
School District and is a permitted use as an essential public service. As the District is preparing
for an increase of over 2,000 students in the next ten year, they are planning to maximize the use
of the District's existing buildings while expanding other facilities. The District is proposing to
relocate the District's maintenance and transportation operations to a new site in Hugo with
appropriate services and support operations as the current site has operational challenges and
limitations.
The proposed facility in Hugo will include:
• Bus and van/shuttle parking of approximately 75 varying vehicles;
• Building space for offices for transportation and maintenance staff (approximately 5,000
square feet);
• Building space to perform vehicle maintenance operations (approximately 10,000 square
feet);
• Fueling for vehicles; and
• Parking for staff.
The district is proposing that the vehicle parking be located outside as exterior storage, which
exceeds the total square footage of the proposed building and therefore requires approval of a
conditional use permit. The vehicles proposed to be stored on site are for specific transportation
needs such as special education transportation vehicles and buses for field trips. The buses that
are used for standard bus routes will be stored at a different location. As a result, on average, ten
buses would begin routes at around 6:30 AM, with other vehicles having staggered start times to
their routes. Some vehicles stored at the proposed site will be spare vehicles for backup
purposes.
3. SKETCH PLAN:
Lot Size
The minimum lot size in the General Industrial (I-3) zoning district is 15,000 square feet. The
proposed parcel is 300,639 square feet or 7.06 acres.
Setbacks
The applicant will be required to meet all setback requirements for the General Industrial zoning
district. The setbacks are as follows:
Sketch Plan Review and Exterior Storage CUP
Page 3
Minimum front yard building setback
30 ft
Minimum side yard building setback
from industrial zoned properties
Equal to height of building,
in no case less than ten feet
Minimum side yard building setback
from properties not zoned industrial
40 ft
Minimum rear yard building setback
30 ft
Maximum building height
50 ft
Building Coverage and Lot Coverage
The ordinance limits lot area to be covered by buildings to 40% and lot area to be covered by
impervious surface to 80%. The sketch plan proposes 196,000 square feet of impervious surface
and 15,000 square feet of building. Per the sketch plan, 65% of the site is to be covered by
impervious surface and 5% by building. This complies with the ordinance.
Landscaping and Lighting
Section 90-181 of the City Code provides landscaping requirements for industrial development.
In order to meet the landscape requirements for a 15,000 square foot building or an
approximately 2,325 foot site perimeter, 24 overstory deciduous trees, 12 coniferous trees, 12
ornamental trees, and 78 shrubs would need to be installed. The applicant will be required to
submit a full landscape plan with a site plan application.
The ordinance requires lighting to consist of cut-off fixtures and for light cast on adjacent
property and roads to not exceed a half foot candle measured at the property line or one foot
candle measured at the street's centerline. The applicant has not proposed any lighting at this
time but shall comply with the ordinance standards at the time a site plan application is
submitted.
Fencing and Screening
The applicant is proposing fencing along the perimeter of the vehicle parking pad. The applicant
has stated that they will use an opaque metal fencing to provide screening. The fence will be
located along the perimeter of the exterior storage area. The applicant has also stated that
landscaping will be placed along the fencing to provide additional screening. The building will
also provide screening from the front property line. Upon submittal of a site plan application, the
material and color of the fencing will be reviewed and approved by staff. The ordinance requires
all exterior storage areas be screened from the adjacent properties. All exterior storage areas are
required to be on pavement. The sketch plan does not show an area for a trash enclosure. Staff
recommends that the trash enclosure be integrated into the building.
Sketch Plan Review and Exterior Storage CUP
Page 4
Streets and Access
The site has access from Fenway Boulevard North. The applicant is proposing two entrances into
the site. The plan shows two right in, right out entrances however, the applicant has stated that
buses and vans will be arriving to and departing from both the north and south entrances. Staff
has asked for further clarification on circulation throughout the site and has asked the applicant
to create an emphasis on interior circulation. Staff has also asked for a plan showing bus
movements.
Per the engineer's comments, the northern entrance is appropriately aligned with 134th Street
North and the proposed southern entrance is directly adjacent to the access for the property to the
south. Staff would like to better understand the circulation needs within the site to determine if
the southern entrance can be relocated or eliminated.
Parking
According to the Section 90-253 Parking and Loading, based on the use and the size of the
building the required number of parking spaces for the 15,000 square foot building is 65. The
applicant is proposing I10 parking spaces to accommodate the estimated number of staff. The
proposed parking spaces exceed the ordinance requirements.
Trails
There is a City trail along Fenway Boulevard North. The applicant is not proposing any
sidewalks or trails with this development.
Building Architecture
The sketch plan review application does not require elevations of the building. The applicant has
submitted images of similar projects and has stated that the materials will likely be a mix of
integrally -colored split -face rock, brick, precast panels, glass, and metal as an accent. The
materials will be of a cohesive color scheme that is compatible with the surrounding uses. The
applicant is aware that the building will have to meet the Commercial and Industrial Design
Guidelines. The Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines includes using four sided design,
the use of high quality durable materials, and having a clearly defined and visible entrance. Staff
will evaluate the final design, building materials, and color palette once a site plan application is
submitted.
Signage
The applicant is not showing any signage at this time. The applicant will be required to submit a
sign permit application and gain staff approval should they want to install a sign.
Drainage/Grading
The applicant has stated that there is an existing pond used for stormwater management that was
developed in 2006 that will be incorporated into the design. Additional stormwater management
Sketch Plan Review and Exterior Storage CUP
Page 5
is likely required. The applicant will need to obtain a permit from the City for their Stormwater
Management Plan within the site that includes the appropriate storage, rate control, treatment,
and volume reduction. There is a high likelihood that the site can support water reuse and this
should be explored in greater detail upon site plan submittal.
Per the City Engineer's comments, the low floor elevation of the building shall be three feet
above the 100 year high water level and one foot above drainage emergency overflow areas. The
applicant shall submit a grading plan as part of a site plan review.
Utilities
City sewer and water connections are available and the applicable trunk and connection fees will
apply. The applicant shall comply with the engineer's comments and will need to verify the
locations for connections.
Wetlands
The applicant will be required to complete a wetland delineation, however, there are no wetlands
identified in the National Wetland Inventory. The property is not located in a FEMA flood plain
or flood way area.
Park Dedication
Park dedication is not required for commercial and industrial developments.
4. ANALYSIS OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT:
A. Level of City Discretion in Decision -Making
The City's discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or
not the proposed application meets the standards outlined in the City's Comprehensive Land Use
Regulations. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the conditional use permit.
B. Conditional Use Permit
Exterior Storage
The applicant is proposing an outdoor storage area that exceeds the size of the principal building
on site. In the General Industrial District exterior storage exceeding the size of the principal
building may be allowed by a conditional use permit.
The Planning Commission must review the application for a conditional use permit with the
standards provided in Section 90-37 of Zoning and Land Use Regulations. Staff used these
standards to review the application and found that the request meets all applicable standards as
follows:
Sketch Plan Review and Exterior Storage CUP
Page 6
1. The proposed use is permissible bylaw.
The proposed use is permissible by law.
2. The proposed use is keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance.
The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to allow exterior storage, as long as it's adequately
screened from view of adjacent properties. The applicant is proposing to screen the exterior
storage areas. The exterior storage area will be located behind the principal building and staff is
comfortable with the proposed location of the outdoor storage area. Additional landscaping may
be required to screen the locations on the east side of the property.
3. The proposed use is compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the character of
the surrounding area.
The property is guided as Industrial in the 2040 Land Use Plan with residential properties to the
west. The character of the area is mostly industrial. There are industrial users to the north, east,
and south of the property that also utilize exterior storage on site. The surrounding industrial
users have similar ratios of buildings to exterior storage and is compatible with the land use of
the surrounding area. In addition to Fenway Boulevard, the building and proposed screening will
act as a buffer between the residential neighborhood and the industrial park. It is in staff's
opinion that the proposed use is compatible with the character of the surrounding area.
The applicant is cognizant of the residential neighborhood within close proximity of the site.
Staff has asked the applicant to create an emphasis of interior circulation on site to limit the
traffic on public streets.
4. The proposed use has adequate drainage, water supply, electrical, gas, and sewage
treatment facilities.
The property has adequate utilities available to the site and will utilize stormwater management
on site.
5. The proposed use has adequate road access.
The property has adequate access from Fenway Boulevard North.
6. Technical Evaluation of Floodplain.
The applicant is not proposing to impact any floodplain.
7. The proposed use may not create a danger that materials may be swept onto other lands, or
downstream to the injury of others, or block bridges, culverts, or other hydraulic structures.
The proposed use will not have materials swept downstream.
Sketch Plan Review and Exterior Storage CUP
Page 7
8. The proposed use will not damage or reduce the benefits the public receives from public
waters.
The site is not located adjacent to the public waters.
9. If located in the shoreland overlay district, the waterbody will be able to safely accommodate
the number, type, and uses of the watercraft the project will generate.
The property is not located within the shoreland overlay district and does not involve watercrafts.
10. If located in the shoreland overlay district, all structures and facilities are screened from
view from public waters.
The property is not located within the shoreland overlay district.
11. If the permit is to approve a wetlands replacement plan, the plan is in conformance with
the rules of the state board of soil and water resources for such plans.
The use would not impact any wetlands.
12. The applicant or operator shall obtain all necessary state and local permits for the
conditional use.
The applicant shall be responsible for all necessary state and local permits.
13. The proposed use is adequately buffered and screened from noncompatible land uses and
public rights-of-way.
The exterior storage area will be fully screened with an opaque fence and additional landscaping
from the surrounding properties. The location of the proposed exterior storage area is behind the
principal building and will be located far from the public street. The surrounding properties are
industrial users and have similar building to exterior storage ratios on site. The building and
proposed screening will create a buffer between the residential and industrial uses.
5. CONCLUSION/ STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
The applicant is asking for the Planning Commission to provide comments on the sketch plan.
Staff is recommending that Commissioners provide comments on the circulation of the site, the
proposed fencing and screening, and access to the site.
It is in staff opinion that the application meets of the standards and requirements for approval of
a conditional use permit.
Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit subject to the conditions listed in the
resolution and draft conditional use permit.
Sketch Plan Review and Exterior Storage CUP
Page 8
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Location Map
2. Resolution
3. Conditional Use Permit
4. Sketch Plan
5. Applicants Narrative revised November 14, 2019
6. Engineers Memo dated November 14, 2019
7. Email from Resident
i CFFY OF
EST. 180E
WBL Transportation Facility CUP
Location Map
Hugo, MN
Roads
Hugo Border
Parcel Boundary
N
0 300
Feet
1 in = 300 feet
RESOLUTION 2019 -XX
APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR ISD #624 WHITE BEAR
LAKE AREA SCHOOLS TO ALLOW EXTERIOR STRORAGE ON THE
PROPERTY LOCATED ON FENWAY BOULEVARD NORTH, NORTH OF
130TH STREET NORTH
WHEREAS, ISD #624 White Bear Lake Area Schools, requested approval of a
conditional use permit to allow exterior storage exceeding the size of the principal
building on the property located on Fenway Boulevard North and north of 130th Street
North.
Lot 3, Block 1, Bald Eagle Industrial Park 4th Addition
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said conditional use permit at a duly
called public hearing on November 21, 2019, and recommends approval subject to the
conditions listed in this resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the
conditional use permit for ISD #624 White Bear Lake Area Schools to allow exterior
storage exceeding the size of the principal building on the property located on Fenway
Boulevard North, north of 130th Street North with the following findings:
1. The use is permissible by law.
2. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to allow exterior storage as long as it is
adequately screened from view of adjacent properties. The applicant is proposing
to screen the exterior storage area. The proposed use is keeping with the spirit and
intent of the ordinance.
3. The property is guided as Industrial in the 2040 Land Use Plan with industrial
users to the north, east, and south of the property. The proposed use is compatible
with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the character of the surrounding area.
4. The property has adequate utilities available to the site and will utilize stormwater
management on site.
5. The property has adequate access from Fenway Boulevard North.
6. The applicant is not proposing to impact any floodplain or wetlands.
7. The proposed use will not create a danger that materials may be swept
downstream.
8. The proposed use will not damage or reduce the benefits the public receives form
public waters.
9. The property is not located within the shoreland district.
Resolution 2019-xx
Page 2
10. The applicant shall be responsible for all necessary state and local permits.
11. The exterior storage area shall be fully screened with fencing around the
perimeter of the exterior storage area and additional landscaping along the fence.
The building along with the proposed screening will create a buffer between the
residential and industrial uses. The proposed use shall be adequately buffered and
screened from non -compatible land uses and public rights-of-way.
ADOPTED by the City Council this 2nd day of December, 2019.
Tom Weidt, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michele Lindau, City Clerk
CITY OF HUGO
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
DATE OF APPROVAL:
OWNER: ISD #624 White Bear Lake Area Schools
4855 Bloom Avenue
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
PROPERTY FOR WHICH CUP IS GRANTED: 30.031.21.41.0016
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot 3, Block 1, Bald Eagle Industrial Park 4th Addition
ZONING DISTRICT: General Industrial District (I-3)
THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWS FOR THE FOLLOWING:
Exterior storage exceeding the size of the principal building for the proposed ISD #624
White Bear Lake Area Schools transportation and maintenance facility as an essential
public service on the above property.
THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO
COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS:
1. The development shall comply with Resolution 2019-xx.
2. The applicant shall comply with the engineers comments dated November 14,
2019.
3. The property shall comply with exhibit A.
4. A site plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the City Council prior
to any site improvements or exterior storage.
5. The layout, geometrics, and interior circulation of the site plan shall be furthered
review and approved by City staff prior to the issuance of a building permit.
6. All exterior storage shall be screened form view from adjacent properties, non-
compatible uses, and public rights-of-way. Staff shall review and approve the
fencing material and landscape plan.
7. Exterior storage of vehicles shall be located on a paved surface and contained to
the area defined in exhibit A.
8. The number of entrances into the site shall be reviewed and approved by City
staff.
9. The building architecture is subject to further review and approval by the City.
Tom Weidt, Mayor
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON)
On this day of , 2019, before me, a Notary
Public, personally appeared TOM WEIDT, Mayor of the City of Hugo, a Minnesota
municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf
of the City of Hugo by the authority of the City Council of the City of Hugo, and TOM
WEIDT, mayor, acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City of
Hugo.
Notary Public
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) ss.
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON)
On this day of , 2019, before me, a Notary Public within and
for said County, personally appeared , to me known as
the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, who stated that they
are the owners of the property this permit applies to, and acknowledged that they
executed the same as their free act and deed.
Notary Public
This document was drafted by: Hugo City Council
14669 Fitzgerald Ave N
Hugo, MN 55038
nwo,
134-r[jSrN
1
1
1
1
/
STORMWATER
POND
T1+, u
WATE
MR
O AIN _
SANITARY ' 1
/�, SEC1rER PIPE OFFICES
00 _
Q I I SPARKING
z � S �(j
LLJn L
/ n
SGATEG�T �
1 � �
FUEL TANK /i
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #624 - WHITE BEAR LAKE
AREA SCHOOLS
2019 REFERENDUM PLANNING
October 1, 2019
NOTE: THIS IS A
\\ CONCEPTUAL
TEST FIT PLAN.
PRAKING FGR
72 BUSES
CE AT
PERIMETER
NORDLING PROPERTY -
DRAFT TRANSPORTATION
&SITE PLAN
1 " = 100-0"
0 75' 150'
10/1 /2019 12:14:58 PM
S:\ISD6242018 Planning\Revit\2019 Referendum Scope Diagrams Transponation. rvt Comm No: 182154
I
SLIDING %
GATE C -f
GARAGE
/ \ SLIDING
GATE C ��
u FUEL
�
ISLAND
�
MAINTENANCE
SGATEG�T �
1 � �
FUEL TANK /i
INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #624 - WHITE BEAR LAKE
AREA SCHOOLS
2019 REFERENDUM PLANNING
October 1, 2019
NOTE: THIS IS A
\\ CONCEPTUAL
TEST FIT PLAN.
PRAKING FGR
72 BUSES
CE AT
PERIMETER
NORDLING PROPERTY -
DRAFT TRANSPORTATION
&SITE PLAN
1 " = 100-0"
0 75' 150'
10/1 /2019 12:14:58 PM
S:\ISD6242018 Planning\Revit\2019 Referendum Scope Diagrams Transponation. rvt Comm No: 182154
wu
`White Bear Lake
e • Area Schools
Revised November 14, 2019
Rachel Juba
Community Development Director
City of Hugo
14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N.
Hugo, Minnesota 55038
Re: White Bear Lake Area Schools — ISD #624
Independent School District #624
White Bear Lake Area Schools
2019 Referendum Projects
Revised November 14, 2019
Nordling Property — Potential Transportation Facility
Narrative for Sketch Plan Review; Conditional Use Permit (outdoor storage exceeding
total building area)
ISD #624 Facilities Plan Overview
Independent School District #624, White Bear Lake Area Schools, has a bond referendum on November 5,
2019 to address facility needs across the entire District, including additional space to accommodate projected
enrollment growth; safety and security updates for all schools; creation of flexible learning spaces to support
student -centered instruction; and the creation of a unified, single 9-12 high school at the current North
Campus site. This plan was recommended to the School Board after nearly a year of study by the Facility
Planning Committee, a group of over 90 staff, parents, students and community members. This plan addresses
growth across the entire District, including a proposal to build a new Elementary School in Hugo, as the
District is projected to reach approximately 10,800 students in the next ten years, an increase of over 2,000
students from the current Fall 2019 enrollment of 8,702 students.
A significant element of this request includes the creation of a single -site 9-12 high school via additions and
renovations to the current North Campus building that is located near downtown White Bear Lake, MN.
After carefully considering many options for how to best address growth at the secondary level, educational
programming needs, and how to resolve issues related to the current split -campus high school model, the
Committee recommended to the School Board to expand North Campus to create a single -site high school
that accommodates projected enrollment and will allow for expanded opportunities for students. The North
Campus site was selected for several reasons, including expandability of the building, site size, and geographic
location within the District. It was a high priority of the Committee to find a solution that best served high
school students across the entire District, and the central location of North Campus best met this criteria. As
a result of this, Sunrise Park Middle School will move to the current South Campus site, creating additional
capacity at the Middle School level. Central Middle School will expand into the current District Office space to
create additional space for classrooms, and the District Center will move to the current Sunrise Park building
along with the Transition Education Center (currently in leased space) and Early Childhood programming for
the south part of the District. This plan maximizes use of the District's existing buildings and provides
solutions to space needs across all of ISD #624.
Page I
Independent School District #624
WT
White Bear Lake White Bear Lake Area Schools
Area Schools 2019 Referendum Projects
ell
Revised November 14, 2019
In order to provide appropriate space on-site at North Campus for the building addition, expanded parking
and drop off areas, and athletic fields, the plan proposes to relocate the District's maintenance and
transportation operations to a new site with appropriate services to support operations. The facilities
currently serving this function on the North Campus / Central Middle School site do not provide adequate
parking, access to maintenance resources, or office space for relevant staff, leading to operational challenges
and limitations. This facility has been located in a residential area for many years and the District has not
received complaints related to these operations from neighbors, several of whom are within very close
proximity.
Preliminary Engineering Review and Property Description
ISD #624 has been studying potential sites to support these functions and has identified the 7 -acre property
located at 13XXX Fenway Blvd, Hugo, MN to relocate these functions (PID 30.031.21.41.0016). The District
has been in contact with the landowner and have a signed purchase agreement, pending the outcome of the
bond referendum and planning processes (these applications). The site is zoned 1-3 General Industrial and is
proposed to continue to be used for industrial purposes per the City of Hugo's 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
The location is advantageous operationally and would be a complimentary use to the surrounding properties.
This property consists of approximately 7 acres of vacant land located on the east side of Fenway Boulevard
North between 13419 and 13285 Fenway Boulevard North (Lot 3, Block I of the Bald Eagle Industrial Park,
4TH Addition).
The property current consists of a mixture of open and wooded land. No wetland areas have been identified
on or directly adjacent to this property. This property is not located in a FEMA flood plain or flood way area.
No natural streams, ponds, or other bodies of water are located near this property. The closest body of
water is about 500 feet to the northwest of this property and consists of a stormwater detention basin.
A review of the elevation contours provided for this site in the Minnesota DNR Topography website indicate
that the site has a general slope downward from east to west, with elevations varying from about 934 to 928.
The website also indicates a small hill near the center of the site near the north property line with the highest
elevation being about 946 which is about 12 feet above the adjacent surround land surface. There is an
existing pond used for stormwater management that was developed in 2006 that will be incorporated into the
design. Information about this pond has been included with our application for reference.
Information available at the USDA Web Soil Survey website, along with previous soil borings performed at this
site in 2006 indicate that fine sandy soils are predominate consisting of silty sands and sands with silt. About
6 inches of topsoil existing at the surface over the sandy soils. Water encountered in the soil borings was at
such a depth (about 8 feet or more) that it is not anticipated to negatively impact the proposed construction.
Page 2
wu
`White Bear Lake
e • Area Schools
Transportation and Maintenance Facility Overview
The functions that would be located on this site include:
Independent School District #624
White Bear Lake Area Schools
2019 Referendum Projects
Revised November 14, 2019
• Bus and van/shuttle parking (approx. 75 vehicles total of varying sizes, outdoors)
• Building space for offices for transportation and maintenance staff (approx. 5,000 SF)
• Building space to support maintenance of buses and other vehicles (approx. 10,000 SF), including
vehicle lifts, parts/tools/work areas and storage
• Fueling for vehicles (diesel and unleaded)
• Parking for staff and drivers (approx. 100 stalls)
Given that these uses require parking, maintenance/vehicle service, and fueling, the District proposes that
these uses would be best characterized as an Essential Public Service, which is a permitted use. The District
proposes that the vehicleparking be located outside, which exceeds the total area of proposed buildings and
requires a Conditional Use Permit.
The vehicles proposed to be stored at and operated out of this site are used for specific transportation needs,
including special education transportation vehicles and buses that serve to meet the needs of field trips /
activities. Buses that are used for standard bus routes are provided through a contract with First Student and
are stored on a separate site (not proposed to be relocated to this site as a part of this request). As a result,
on average, about 10 buses would begin routes at the start of the day (6:30 AM), with other vehicles having
staggered start times to their routes. Some vehicles serve as backup / spare vehicles, and as such would not
always leave the site unless another vehicle was not in service. Approximately 60% of the vehicles proposed to
be stored at this site are diesel and the other 40% use unleaded fuel.
Sketch Plan Narrative
The attached sketch plan represents a conceptual layout for the site, locating all intended elements as well as
preliminary engineering information, including areas for stormwater management, connection to city utilities
(per documents provided by the City of Hugo), and conceptual grading/topography. Below is a table of
allowable areas and proposed areas.
Total Site Area
300,639 SF
Allowable Impervious Area
240,51 1 SF (80%)
Impervious Area shown on Sketch Plan
196,000 SF
Proposed Building Area
15,000 SF
Proposed Exterior Storage
45,957 SF
Allowable Exterior Storage
15,000 SF
Additional Exterior Storage (CUP)
31,347 SF
Page 3
wu
`White Bear Lake
e • Area Schools
Building and Site Design
Independent School District #624
White Bear Lake Area Schools
2019 Referendum Projects
Revised November 14, 2019
The proposed buildings will not exceed one story in height and will follow all required setbacks for the site,
which is zoned 1-3 General Industrial. At this time, the District does not anticipate exceeding the permitted
80% of site area as impervious surfaces, as can be seen on the attached sketch plan layout. While the
proposed design is conceptual in nature at this time, the District is committed to meeting the principles of the
City of Hugo's Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines, including: four-sided design; approved materials
(likely a mix of integrally -colored split -face rock, brick, integrally -colored precast panels as permitted per 10.5,
glass, and metal as an accent); a cohesive color scheme that is compatible with surrounding uses; and
appropriate screening, among other aspects.
As a part of this request, the District is requesting a CUP to allow for vehicle storage (parking) to exceed the
allowed 1:1 ratio with building area. The indoor building needs for the District total approx. 15,000 square
feet, which the "outline area" of bus and van storage totals approximately 46,000 SF (note: this includes drive
aisles, etc.). To mitigate this, the District is committed to providing appropriate screening for the requested
bus and vehicle storage through the use of opaque fencing and appropriate landscaping. The proposed fencing
extents are indicated on the sketch plan and example fencing types/materials have been provided in the
included Attachment B of this narrative. The sketch plan also includes areas available for landscaping with a
dark green color. These areas and proposed solutions include landscaping along Fenway Blvd as well as
continuous fencing around all four sides of the proposed exterior vehicle storage/parking along with areas for
landscaping outside the fence perimeter as well.
This memorandum serves as an addendum to the conditional use permit for additional exterior storage at 134XX
Fenway to clarify the rationale for the conditional use permit and to address questions regarding the impact of this
request.
Additional Information — as of November 14, 2019
Narrative regarding Conditional Use Permit Findings:
• This use is permissible by law and is in the spirit and intent of the City of Hugo's code.
• The use is compatible with the City of Hugo's comprehensive plan and character of the surrounding area.
Surrounding businesses have similar ratios of buildings to exterior storage, with buildings focused closer to
Fenway Boulevard and storage on the west side of sites.
• The proposed use has adequate drainage, water supply, electrical, gas and sewage treatment.
• The road access is adequate, and the additional exterior storage will not reduce the safety or capacity of
the public road system. There is no change in impact to the roadway system in proposing to store buses
and vans outside (screened) in lieu of inside a building.
• The proposed use does not create a danger that materials may be swept onto other lands, or downstream
to the injury of others, or block bridges, culverts, or other hydraulic structures. The material to be stored
is school buses and vans which will not create any of the mentioned hazards.
• The proposed use nor the request for additional exterior storage will not damage or reduce the benefits
the public receives from public waters.
• The project is not located in a shoreland overlay district.
Page 4
Independent School District #624
WT
White Bear Lake White Bear Lake Area Schools
Area Schools 2019 Referendum Projects
ell
Revised November 14, 2019
• There is not an anticipated need to pursue a wetlands replacement plan.
• All necessary state and local permits will be secured for the project.
• The District intends to avoid the concern of having visible exterior storage by committing to substantial
screening around the entirety of the bus / van parking area, proposed to be made of opaque metal panel as
is shown in the provided example images. Landscaping buffers are also proposed (indicated in green on the
site plan) to create additional screening. This is particularly focused on the public rights of way. This is
proposed to address any visual concerns with outdoor storage while avoiding the use of significant
infrastructure (footings / walls, garage doors, roofing, etc). to accomplish a similar effect for those who can
see or pass by the site.
Elevations:
The building has not been designed yet; the voters of ISD #624 approved the referendum on November 5, 2019,
including funding to pursue full design. The design will be reviewed with City staff through the design process, and
the District continues to be committed to meeting the principles of the City of Hugo's Commercial and Industrial
Design Guidelines, including: four-sided design; approved materials (likely a mix of integrally -colored split -face rock,
brick, integrally -colored precast panels as permitted per 10.5, glass, and metal as an accent); a cohesive color
scheme that is compatible with surrounding uses. Below are images that represent the proposed character and
aesthetics of the buildings based on similar examples.
Page 5
Wu�'Nhite Bear Lake
Area Schools
Independent School District #624
White Bear Lake Area Schools
2019 Referendum Projects
Revised November 14, 2019
Site Circulation:
Buses and vans will be arriving to and departing this site from both the north and the south as they leave to cover
special education bus routes, activities / field trips, etc. The buses and vans proposed to be located on this site are
not used for general education standard bus routes; the District contracts with First Student to provide these
services, and those vehicles are stored off-site. Buses and vans are intended to enter the site on the northern curb
cut and proceed either to the storage area (all one-way traffic) or to the maintenance garage for servicing, etc. The
Page 6
Independent School District #624
WT
White Bear Lake White Bear Lake Area Schools
Area Schools 2019 Referendum Projects
ell
Revised November 14, 2019
District is committed to working with the City to eliminate the need for buses to circulate on the street and
support interior circulation. A second curb cut shown as an exit; buses/vans will turn both right and left when
leaving the site depending on their intended destination.
Additional documents related to the site that have been made available the District are attached, including:
• Topographic survey (dated 2006)
• Geotechnical report (dated 2006)
• Existing stormwater pond documents (dated 2007)
Please feel free to call or email with any questions.
Sincerely,
Wold Architects and Engineers
�" VLVO�e
Sal Bagley I AIA, LEED AP BD+C
Partner
cc: Wayne Kazmierczak, ISD #624
Tim Wald, ISD #624
Paul Aplikowski, Wold Architects and Engineers
Attachments:
Attachment A: FEMA Flood Map
Attachment B: Example photos — Opaque Fencing / Screening
Page 7
Vhite Bear Lake
10.0 Area Schools
Attachment A: FEMA Flood Map
Independent School District #624
White Bear Lake Area Schools
2019 Referendum Projects
Revised November 14, 2019
Page 8
wu
White Bear Lake
e • Area Schools
Exhibit B: Example Photos — Opaque Fencing / Screening
Independent School District #624
White Bear Lake Area Schools
2019 Referendum Projects
Revised November 14, 2019
Page 9
wsb
November 14, 2019
Ms. Rachel Juba
Community Development Director
City of Hugo
14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North
Hugo, MN 55038
Re: Concept Plan Review
ISD 624 Transportation Site Sketch Plan
WSB Project No. 013272-000
Dear Ms. Juba:
We have reviewed the concept plan for the proposed ISD 624 Transportation Site. Our review is
based on the Sketch Plan submitted by the School District. We will provide a more in-depth review
of this project once detailed plans are provided by the applicant.
Based on our review, we offer the following comments regarding the sketch plan:
Grading and Drainage
1. Site Grading/Low-floor Elevations: Low opening of the building needs to be 3 -feet above the
100 -year high water level and 1 -foot above drainage emergency overflow areas.
2. Storm Water Management: The applicant will need to obtain a permit from the City for their
Storm Water Management Plan within the site, including the appropriate storage, rate control,
treatment, and volume reduction. There is a high likelihood that the site can support water
reuse, and this should be explored in greater detail moving forward.
Transportation/Traffic
Site Access Locations: The northerly entrance is appropriately aligned with 1341h Street. The
proposed southerly entrance is directly adjacent to the access for the property to the south.
Staff would like to better understand the circulation needs within the site to determine if this
access can be relocated or eliminated.
Sanitary Sewer Service
A 42" MCES interceptor extends along Fenway Avenue. The proposed sanitary sewer service
should be relocated to utilize the 8" stub that extends from the Manhole at 1341h Street. MCES
will require a connection permit for direct connection as proposed but may not require a
Ms. Rachel Juba
November 14, 2019
Page 2
connection permit for connecting to the existing stub. Connection to the existing stub will be
less impactful to Fenway Avenue.
Water Service
1. Watermain Improvements: Water service is available by connecting to the existing system along
Fenway Avenue. The Hugo Fire Department may request internal watermain with Hydrants for
water suppression purposes.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this concept plan. If you have any questions or items
you wish to discuss, you can contact me at 651-286-8463.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Mark Erichson, PE
City Engineer
Attachment
cc: Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician, City of Hugo
Scott Anderson, Public Works Director, City of Hugo
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. If you have any questions,
please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Mark Erichson, PE
City Engineer
From: David Rowley
To: Emily Weber
Subject: Public Hearing 11-21 re WBLAS Proposed transportation and maintenance facility
Date: Friday, November 15, 2019 9:59:49 AM
Dear Emily,
Thank you for speaking to my daughter Lynda, who resides in our Creekview town
home at 13377 Europa Court N Unit 4. As legal owner, I am in receipt of your notice
of the upcoming hearing regarding the proposed maintenance facility directly across
the street from our property on the east side of Fenway.
The site plan of the proposed facility indicates it to be adjacent to and north of
Northland Pallet's facility. We already experience noise from that facility with a line up
of semi trucks on a regular basis, including predawn noise and a certain amount of
traffic congestion on Fenway from parked trucks awaiting load up of pallets.
We are greatly concerned about another facility adjacent to this one that will only
compound existing noise and traffic, not to mention diesel emissions. If the City
intends to consider granting a Conditional Use Permit to WBLAS for this facility
including excessive exterior storage, what will it do to represent the interests of us
residents who own homes that will be directly impacted by this facility?
My main concerns are, noise, traffic, visual impacts and air quality. Please advise me
if there will be any studies conducted to address these matters. Please consider what
can be done to mitigate these should the CUP be granted.
Many residents will be impacted by this. Have you reached out to our HOA to review
this in detail to seek their feedback? Please consider doing so as they are a
constituency already existing in the Hugo community, and the fact these are
permanent residences with many impacted families we think it should hold a sense of
duty by the City to have our best interests upheld in lieu of a business interest of
another township.
What other suitable locations have been considered to house this facility that is not in
such close proximity to our homes? Does the City have other more suitable property
for consideration? There seems to be other vacant land further west by 1-35 that
seems a potential alternative. Please address this request to identify other locations
not in such close proximity to our neighborhood.
I am 86 years old and I am physically unable to attend the meeting so please present
my concerns, comments and questions in my correspondence to the City authorities
next Thursday evening. I appreciate your time and consideration.
Yours truly,
David F. Rowley Jr
13377 Europa Ct N #4
Hugo MN