Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Packet 12.19.19AGENDA HUGO PLANNING COMMISSION THURSDAY, DECEMBER 19, 2019 HUGO CITY HALL 7:00 p.m. A. ROLL CALL (Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Luchsinger, Mulvihill, Tjernlund) B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. November 21, 2019 D. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Edmund Tschida — Zoning amendment request to rezone from the Long Term Agricultural Zoning District to the Agricultural Zoning District. 2. Jeffrey Penton — A conditional use permit request to allow a shared driveway. 3. Wayne Scanlon — A conditional use permit request to allow a shared driveway and a variance request from the street frontage requirement for the property located at 17530 Henna Avenue North. 4. OP5 Adelaide, LLC — A PUD amendment request to change setback requirements for Adelaide Landing. 5. Fenway Land Company — A preliminary plat and PUD for a development to be known as "Rice Lake Reserve." E. NEW BUSINESS F. OLD BUSINESS G. ADJOURNMENT If you need accommodations for the Planning Commission meeting please contact Rachel Juba at (651) 762-6304 or riuba(&ci.hugo.mn.us, thank you. Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of Thursdav, November 21, 2019 Vice Chair Arcand called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PRESENT: Arcand, Derr, Lessard, Luchsinger, Mulvihill, Tjernlund. ABSENT: Fry, Kleissler. STAFF: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant Pledge of Allegiance. Approval of Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of October 10, 2019 Commissioner Tjernlund made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Derr to approve minutes for the meeting of October 10, 2019. All ayes. Motion carried. Public Hearing: ISD #624 White Bear Lake Area Schools — Sketch Plan Review and CUP Staff provided background on the sketch plan review and conditional use permit applications submitted by the White Bear Lake School District. The WBL School District is proposing a transportation and maintenance facility and has asked for the Planning Commission to provide comments on the sketch plan. The applicant is also requesting approval of a conditional use permit for exterior storage exceeding the size of the proposed principal building on site. The proposed sketch shows a 15,000 square foot building and the exterior storage area totaling approximately 46,000 square feet. The proposed facility is located in the Bald Eagle Industrial Park and is zoned General Industrial (I-3). The facility will include bus and shuttle/van parking for approximately 75 varying vehicles, building space for offices, building space for maintenance, fueling for vehicles, and parking for staff. Staff provided ordinance standards for lot size, setbacks, building and lot coverage, landscaping, lighting, and parking which will have to be met by the applicant. The applicant is proposing opaque, metal fencing along the perimeter of the proposed vehicle parking pad. The applicant has also stated that landscaping will be placed along the fencing and perimeter of the site to provide additional screening. The ordinance requires all exterior storage areas to be screened from adjacent properties and public right-of-way. The applicant is showing two accesses into the site and the City Engineer has stated that the northern entrance is appropriately aligned with 134th Street, but would like to further analyze the southern entrance upon site plan submittal. Staff also stated that the applicant will also have to adhere to the Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines and building architecture and materials will be evaluated upon site plan submittal. Staff provided an analysis on the conditional use permit request. The applicant is proposing an outdoor storage area that exceeds the size of the principal building on site. The General Industrial Zoning District November 21, 2019 PC Minutes Page 2 allows exterior storage exceeding the size of the principal building with the approval of a conditional use permit and staff found that the request meets the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The properties to the north, east, and south of the proposed facility location are also within the Bald Eagle Industrial Park and are occupied by industrial users that have similar exterior storage to building ratios. It is in staff's opinion that the proposed use is compatible with the character of the surrounding area. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission provide comments to the applicant on the circulation of the site, the proposed fencing and screening, and access to the site. It is in staff's opinion that the application meets the standards and requirements for approval of a conditional use permit and recommended approval of the request subject to the conditions outlined in the resolution and conditional use permit. Staff also recommended that the Planning Commission open the public hearing and take all public comment. The Planning Commission had no questions for staff and invited the applicant to come forward. Tim Wald, assistant superintendent for finance and operations of the White Bear Lake Area Schools, 2530 Oak Court, White Bear Lake, MN and Sal Bagley with Wold Architects and Engineers came forward to address the Planning Commission. Wald started by saying that the School District just passed a bond referendum, which will involve unifying the district's split campus high school to one high school. The high school will move to the north campus location in White Bear Lake, which is where the current bus garage is located. Expanding the high school means finding a new location for the transportation facility and to help serve the significant growth of the district, the district is proposing the new transportation and maintenance facility in Hugo. Vice Chair Arcand asked if the proposed site will be the primary transportation facility for the school district. Wald clarified that the standard bus routes are contracted through First Student and those buses are maintained by First Student. The routes generated from the new proposed location will primarily be special education routes and field trip excursions. Commissioner Tjernlund asked for the applicant to clarify the location of the fencing. Bagley stated that the fencing is shown with a black, dashed line around the perimeter of the exterior storage parking area. The dark green areas depicted on the site plan show the proposed location of additional landscape screening. A final landscape plan is to be submitted at a later date, but this is intended to show the landscape buffer in addition to the fencing. Tjernlund asked the applicant to consider additional screening along the front end of the site to screen the property from the residential neighborhood to the west. Bagley provided additional height details on the fence and stated that they would propose a ten foot tall fence. Commissioner Luchsinger asked the applicant to provide additional information on the circulation of the site. Bagley stated that the site plan is intended to have the buses enter into the site from the north entrance and exit from the southern access to go either north or south on Fenway Boulevard. The current location of the fueling island is intended to be screened from the public view, however, the applicant is open to exploring other alternatives to allow fueling to be accessible either before or after the bus routes without having the buses leave the site. Bagley also described the circulation for when buses and vehicles need maintenance, which will happen within the building space for maintenance. November 21, 2019 PC Minutes Page 3 Wald stated that buses will be leaving at varied times throughout the day. There will be 25-30 buses that depart during the weekdays from 6:00 — 7:00 AM and returning by 9:30 AM. The 25-30 buses will then depart for their afternoon routes at around 2:00 PM. The daily bus routes will be complete by 5:00 PM. The field trip and special event busing will vary. Commissioner Lessard stated his concerns around the additional traffic the site will create as the school district expands. Juba asked Wald to clarify the total number of vehicle trips. Wald stated that there would be approximately 120 number of trips daily and that the 75 parking spaces are to account for the growth of the district. Staff stated that Fenway Boulevard was designed and constructed to accommodate for the peak usage of the Bald Eagle Industrial Park. Juba stated that the Planning Commission could add language to the conditional use permit that could determine the allowed number of vehicle trips per day on site, however, that number can vary significantly for industrial users. This specific site is intended for an industrial user. Commissioner Derr made the comment that most of the industrial use happens during the day and should not interfere with the residential neighborhood. He also mentioned from his personal experience, morning traffic near 134th Street can get backed up and commented on making the southern entrance the primary access into the site. Derr suggested an all way stop at 130' Street and Fenway and staff stated that a stop sign is not likely to be desirable. Wald made a final comment stating that one of the reasons the school district is interested in this site is because of the controlled access on to Highway 61 from the site. Vice Chair Arcand opened the public hearing at 7:38pm. 13385 Europa Court North — Valerie Falk. Falk came forward to comment on the semi -truck traffic that is consistent on Fenway Boulevard. 13415 Europa Court N — Will Perry. Perry stated his concerns on the visual impact of the site and that the parking and building should be setback 200 feet from Fenway Boulevard. The proposed screening does not seem sufficient. An additional comment included requesting noise and odor abatement be a part of the running and operation of the facility. Perry suggested accessing the site through the property to the north and operation of the facility should not include early mornings, evenings, or weekends. Vice Chair Arcand closed the public hearing at 7:46pm. Juba suggested that the applicant come forward and address the concerns made by the public. Bagley stated that the sketch plan is conceptual at this time and they are willing to work with staff on site plan layout and design. Assistant Superintendent Wald also mentioned that the school district's current facility is in a residential neighborhood and they don't receive complaints about the site. The Commissioners continued to discuss the proposed site layout and operation. The Planning Commission provided comments to the applicant that included continuing working with staff on access into the site and working to mitigate traffic congestion as well as being considerate to the November 21, 2019 PC Minutes Page 4 neighboring residential district. The Commissioners agreed that the proposed use on site is appropriate and the proposed fencing and landscaping will provide sufficient screening. Commissioner Lessard made a motion to approve the conditional use permit request for ISD #624 White Bear Lake Area Schools, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution and conditional use permit. Motion seconded by Tjernlund All Ayes. Motion carried. The applications will be on the December 2, 2019 City Council meeting. Adjournment Commissioner Lessard made a motion, Tjernlund seconded, to adjourn at 7:55 pm. All Ayes. Motion carried. Respectfully Submitted, Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant Agenda Number D.1 CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Hugo Planning Commission FROM: Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant SUBJECT: Ed Tschida. Zoning amendment request to rezone from the Long Term Agricultural Zoning District to the Agricultural Zoning District for the property located at 9822 152nd Street North. DATE: December 12, for the Planning Commission Meeting of December 19, 2019. ZONING: Long Term Agricultural District (LA) REVIEW DEADLINE: February 27, 2019 1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Ed Tschida is requesting to rezone his property from the Long Term Agricultural Zoning District to the Agricultural Zoning District. 2. BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Agricultural Land Preservation Program was established with the passage of the Agricultural Land Preservation Policy Act of 1984, which consists of tools for agricultural land preservation at the local level and a program to create awareness of agricultural land preservation and conservation tools. With this act, counties adopting agricultural land preservation plans can offer agricultural preserves, which limits the use of the land to agriculture or forestry. In return, property owners that opt into the program receive property tax credits and protection for normal agricultural practices. The program also provides tax relief for agricultural and conservation land by requiring the City Assessor to base any assessment on the land's agricultural value, protecting the property from substantial tax levy increases, and protecting the land from special assessments. In order to offer the benefits of agricultural preserves to property owners, a county must have an approved agricultural land preservation plan. An agricultural land preservation plan is a part of a comprehensive land use plan that designates land for long-term agricultural use, while providing Tschida Zoning Amendment Page 2 for expected growth around urbanized areas. Hugo has zoning and subdivision provisions outlined in the City Code that restricts properties zoned Long Term Agricultural to agricultural use and require low residential densities at one dwelling unit per 40 acres. In 2003, Ed Tschida was approved for a zoning amendment from the Agricultural Zoning District to the Long Term Agricultural Zoning District in order to enter into the Minnesota Agricultural Land Preservation Program. Since gaining ownership of his property, Tschida has planted thousands of trees and has created a forest of mostly White Pine, Norway Pine, White Spruce, Oak, Birch, and Aspen trees. The forest combined with the existing wetland on site has created a natural habitat for many species of wildlife. Tschida would like to continue preserving his property by entering into the Minnesota Land Trust Metro Habitat Protection Program. By entering into this program, the property will be under a conservation easement that will limit development on the property. In order to apply to the program offered by Washington County, the property may not be currently enrolled in a permanent protection program, which includes the Minnesota Agricultural Land Preservation Program. Additionally, in order to be removed from the Agricultural Land Preservation Program, the local zoning authority, which is the City of Hugo in this case, needs to approve the zoning amendment from the Long Term Agricultural Zoning District to the Agricultural Zoning District and sign off on the request submitted by the landowner for termination of the current agricultural preserve program. Ed Tschida would like to rezone his property from the Long Term Agricultural Zoning District to the Agricultural Zoning District in order to be eligible to apply to the Land Trust Metro Habitat Protection Program. 3. LEVEL OF DISCRETION IN DECISION MAKING: The City has discretion in approving or denying rezoning applications, based on whether or not the proposal meets the standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. If the City finds that all the applicable standards are met, the rezoning application must be approved. However, if the City finds that any of the applicable standards are not met, the application may be denied. 4. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The subject property is zoned Long Term Agriculture (LA) and the land use is identified as Agricultural. The property to the east is also zoned LA and the properties to the north, west, and south are zoned Agricultural (AG). All surrounding properties are identified as Agricultural in the 2040 Land Use Plan. B. Natural Characteristics of Site The 79.52 acre site has a single family home and one accessory structure located on it. The rest of the property is a mix of wetland and natural vegetation. Tschida has stated that he has planted 4,000 to 5,000 trees over the course of 15 years to include White Pine, Norway Pine, White Spruce, Oak, Birch, and Aspen trees. Tschida Zoning Amendment Page 3 5. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed this rezoning based on the four criteria in the City ordinance under Section 90-40, Zoning Amendments: 1. The requested amendment is in compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan identifies the subject property as agricultural. The requested amendment would not change the land use of the property. The property is located in the east part of the City, which is planned for agricultural and rural residential uses. 2. The proposed zoning classification is appropriate for the property given the topographic, environmental and cultural limitations of the site. The property consists of a single family home and primarily natural vegetation and wetlands. While the property is not used for traditional agricultural pursuits, is does contain high quality natural areas and trees. The Agricultural zoning would be an appropriate for the property. 3. Existing public infrastructure is adequate to handle the development that can reasonable be foreseen on the site. The property is served by well and septic. Municipal sewer and water is not available to this area of the City. By changing the zoning from LA to AG, the minimum lot size would change from 40 acres to 10 acres. Because the subject property does not have frontage on a public road, any splitting of the property would require a variance. No development is proposed on the site and because the applicant's intent is to further preserve the property by entering into the Minnesota Land Trust Metro Habitat Protection Program, the existing access to the property is adequate. 4. The proposed zoning classification will not have unreasonable negative impacts on adjacent properties. The rezoning will not negatively impact the adjacent properties. The property will remain in agricultural and open space uses consistent with other properties in the zoning district. S. The floodplain designation on the official zoning map shall not be removed from floodplain areas unless it can be shown that the designation is in error or that the area has been filled to or above the elevation of the regulatory flood protection elevation and is contiguous to lands outside the floodplain. The floodplain areas are not proposed to be impacted. Tschida Zoning Amendment Page 4 6. RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds the application meets the criteria outlined in the City Code and recommends approval of the zoning amendment request to rezone from the Long Term Agricultural Zoning District to the Agricultural Zoning District for the property located at 9822 152nd Street North. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Ordinance for Rezoning 3. Applicant Narrative CI -FY OF EST. 19OG UL, v t�041 IJ -j 9822 152nd Street North Zoning Amendment Location Map Hugo, MN Subject Property Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary N 0 800 Feet 1 in = 800 feet ORDINANCE 2020 -XXX CITY OF HUGO AN ORDINANCE WITHIN THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA AMENDING CHAPTER 90 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LANDS LOCATED 9822 152ND STREET NORTH THE CITY OF HUGO ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Chapter 90 of the City Code of the City of Hugo, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Hugo Zoning Map to Agricultural (AG) with respect to the property legally described as follows: The West half of Northeast Quarter of Section Thirteen in Township Thirty-one North, of Range Twenty-one West, Washington County, Minnesota. Section 1. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon its passage. ADOPTED BY THE HUGO CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 6, 2019. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk My name is Ed Tschida and I am looking to take my land from the current program I am enrolled in and enroll it in the Minnesota Land Trust Metro Habitat Protection Program. I have owned this land for the last 36 years and have many great memories. When I purchased this land, it was a corn field with very little value to wildlife and water quality for most of the year. Being that this property includes many acres of wetland, my goal was to turn the property into a haven for wildlife and an area that improves water quality for miles around. Over the next 15 years I planted 4-5000 trees on the parts of the property that are not wetland. It is now mostly a forest of white pines, norways, white spruce, blue spruce oaks, birch and aspen. That coupled with numerous wetlands, makes this a desirable location for many species of wildlife. There are abundant numbers of deer, swans, geese, ducks, songbirds, pheasants, coyotes and other wildlife. I am now 77 years old and my time with this property is limited. I will have to sell this incredible piece soon. My goal is for this property to remain the pristine property that it is and for my efforts to reach far into the future. When the state and Washington county came to me with the Minnesota Land Trust Metro Habitat Protection Program, I thought this would be the perfect opportunity to do exactly what I have wanted to do with this property all along. I am "all in" on this request from the state and Washington county. I hope all parties involved are "all in" as well. In this process, I have taken 5 different groups or individuals from the state and/or Washington county through my property. They have all exclaimed that this property is exactly the type of property they want enrolled in the program. Sincerely, Ed Tschida Agenda Number D.2 CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Hugo Planning Commission FROM: Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant SUBJECT: Jeff Penton and Shirley E. Nelson -Hill Revocable Trust. Conditional use permit request for a shared driveway on properties generally located north of 122nd Street North and west of Keller Avenue North. DATE: December 12, 2019 for the Planning Commission Meeting of December 19, 2019 LAND USE: Agricultural ZONING: Agricultural (AG) REVIEW DEADLINE: March 4, 2020 1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for a shared driveway between two parcels. The applicant's property is currently landlocked and they are requesting access to Keller Avenue North through a neighboring parcel to the south. Both property owners have signed an easement and maintenance agreement. 2. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The properties are zoned Agricultural (AG) and are determined as Agricultural in the 2040 Land Use Plan. Both properties are over 10 acres and are currently vacant. The surrounding properties are also zoned AG and are large lots that are either vacant or occupied by single family homes. B. Natural Characteristics of Site The northern portion of the property has shore front along South School Section Lake with a mix of varied vegetation and wetland. The other property has a portion of wetland on site. Both parcels are rented out for farming and are used for agricultural purposes. Penton Shared Driveway CUP 3. LEVEL OF DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or not the proposed application meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the conditional use permit. 4. ANALYSIS: A. Consistency with Ordinance Standards The existing, vacant 18.56 acre parcel is a landlocked parcel with no established driveway or access to a public road. Currently, access to the site is through a neighboring parcel to the south, which has frontage on Keller Avenue North. No driveway is currently constructed on either site. A CUP is required for a driveway if it is shared by two or more separate parcels or lots of land. Staff used these standards to review the application and found that the request meets all applicable standards as follows: 1. The proposed use is permissible by law. The proposed use is allowed by conditional use permit. 2. The proposed use is keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The proposed use is allowed in the AG zoning district and will keep with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, which is intended to allow a shared driveway by a CUP as long as they comply with the regulations. 3. The proposed use is compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the character of the surrounding area. The use is existing and is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and the addition will not alter the character of the area. There are shared driveways in the area that provide access to land locked parcels. 4. The proposed use has adequate drainage, water supply, electrical, gas, and sewage treatment facilities. The proposed use has adequate drainage, water supply, and utilities. A driveway permit will be required and a culvert may be needed for drainage. Staff will evaluate the drainage at the time a permit application is submitted. 5. The proposed use has adequate road access. The property will have adequate road access to Keller Avenue North. Penton Shared Driveway CUP 6. Technical Evaluation of Floodplain. The applicant is not proposing to impact any floodplain. 7. The proposed use should not increase the potential for flood damage. The proposed use would not obstruct the floodplain or increase the potential for flooding. 8. The proposed use will not damage or reduce the benefits the public receives from public waters. The proposed use would not damage or reduce the benefits from any public waters. 9. The use of watercraft on public waters. The proposed use would not involve the use of watercraft on public waters. 10. All structures shall be screened from view of public waters. The proposed use is not visible from public waters. 11. Wetland impacts. Prior to the issuance of a driveway permit, a wetland delineation shall be reviewed and approved by staff. At the time a driveway is established, no wetlands shall be impacted. 12. All state and local permits shall be acquired for the conditional use. The applicant would be responsible for obtaining all state and local permits. 13. Adequate screening and buffering from non -compatible uses and public rights-of-way. The proposed use is not visible from non -compatible uses and public right-of-ways. It's in staff's opinion that the request meets all the items required to approve a CUP. It is a condition of approval that the easement area and maintenance agreement will need to be reviewed and approved for the existing driveway. The applicant shall also be required to obtain a permit before the driveway is constructed. 5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It's in staff's opinion that the request meets all the items required for conditional use permit Staff recommends approval of the shared driveway CUP subject to the conditions listed in the attached draft resolution to the Planning Commission. Penton Shared Driveway CUP ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Survey 3. Approving Resolution 4. Conditional Use Permit r`3 ON ,l�CITTY OF^ iiV� EST. 19VV08 � w 47 r ' a ' w; Penton Shared Driveway CUP Location Map Hugo, MN htt Yu�k Subject Properties Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary N 0 500 Feet 1 in = 500 feet r a- ti. (y 1 RWI � ,.. 4 !• ,� I ISI �� rv3.. TJ �P �.I. { • .,� 'i�$Y�Na�nl:` Jae a�'�4�4 .a:if'r ,' v }'�fibi�A` �=! k� �2'�:CA9_`WA:•..�..y.......r.JblCf:.:LSyye�.- ..........F'^Pi.d. .'..�"ia ��.. »Lr35 ri� Penton Shared Driveway CUP Location Map Hugo, MN htt Yu�k Subject Properties Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary N 0 500 Feet 1 in = 500 feet SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION Pwforpw SHIRLEY NELSON AND JEFF PENTON LEGEND DENOTES PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT ■ NORTH 7 1_J 5 111 Professional Land Surveyors www.egrudxom 6,776 Lake Drive N E, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (PER DOCUMENT NO. 3477802) The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota, except those portions previously conveyed. (Previously conveyed parcels are described in doc. no. 3477802 as: All that part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County Minnesota that is described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner on the Northeast Quarter of Sect io?9 5 gth�nce South 00 degrees 31 minutes 04 seconds East, on a assumed bearing, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter for a distance of 1042.90 feet; thence North 60 degrVe� �eminutes 04 seconds West a distance of 527.15 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described, said point of beginning also being the centerline of Keller Avenue (County Road No. 57) as improved; thence continuing North 60 degrees 22 minutes 04 seconds West a distance of 992.46 feet; thence South 21 degrees 52 minutes 12 seconds West a distance of 1131.06 feet; thence South 89 degrees 10 minutes 58 seconds West, a distance of 228.74 feet to the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 36; thence South 00 degrees 22 minutes 46 seconds East, along the West line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 593.90 feet; thence North 89 degrees 10 minutes 58 seconds East, parallel the South line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 700.29 feet to the centerline of said Keller Avenue; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a non—tangential curve concave to the East and having a central angle of 01 degree 25 minutes 21 seconds with a radius of 763.71 feet for an arc distance of 18.96 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 11 degrees 50 minutes 07 seconds East; thence North 12 degrees 32 minutes 47 seconds East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 311.51 feet; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Southeast and having a central angle of 35 degrees 05 minutes 49 seconds with a radius of 533.32 feet for an arc distance of 326.69 feet; thence North 47 degrees 38 minutes 36 seconds East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 603.07 feet; thence Northeast along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Northwest and having a central angle of 08 degrees 35 minutes 50 seconds with a radius of 1256.36 feet for an arc distance of 189.61 feet to the point of beginning. And described in doc. no. 465812 as: The South 662 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota. N89057'43"#r 657.92 NORTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE --- i SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 36 i i PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT DESCRIPTION: A perpetual access easement over under and across the following described property: North half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota lying East of a line 66 feet West and parallel to the West line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 36, except those previously conveyed parcels conveyed per document numbers 3477802 and 465812. \`J X r I I c \ � \� v \ l , (-\ � \_1 I x r I 1 1 I � � r I l , GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. ■ 66.00 I NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 36 I I I 11 .. �'J O 0 O Cn Li r� w O w \ cf) �L, w O z� Lu \ ■ �v \ r^\ \ 1 1 r I \ I ■ ■ I w w Z O w w = I z� J Li I 0 w \ (CONVEYED PER DOC NO. 3477802) I I I I I� PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT I I I I ` 66 I \ I I I I I 1316.88 N89057'52"E MIITFQ ■ ■ <�■ � v r�\ r I \ I \ 1 _1 1 I w w Z O w w = I z� J Li I 0 w \ (CONVEYED PER DOC NO. 3477802) I I I I I� PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT I I I I ` 66 I \ I I I I I 1316.88 N89057'52"E MIITFQ ■ ■ <�■ � v r�\ LINE PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF '\ THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE S'89059'56"E�\ NE 1/4 OF SEC. 36 658.39 \�► NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 662 FEET OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 36 724.44 ------- / SOUTH LINE OF THE NE 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 36 — No Field survey was completed for the preparation of this drawing. — Bearings shown are on Washington County datum. — This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and/or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or an attorney's title opinion. I I rn (CONVEYED PER DOC NO. 465812) O N O 0 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I om o duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. RICHARD L. OLSON Date: License No. 45770 09023 S&L \ 1 1 I r LINE PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF '\ THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE S'89059'56"E�\ NE 1/4 OF SEC. 36 658.39 \�► NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 662 FEET OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 36 724.44 ------- / SOUTH LINE OF THE NE 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 36 — No Field survey was completed for the preparation of this drawing. — Bearings shown are on Washington County datum. — This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and/or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or an attorney's title opinion. I I rn (CONVEYED PER DOC NO. 465812) O N O 0 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I om o duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. RICHARD L. OLSON Date: License No. 45770 09023 S&L RESOLUTION 2020 -XX APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SHARED DRIVEWAY FOR THE PROPERTIES GENERALY LOCATED NORTH OF 122ND STREET NORTH AND WEST OF JODY AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, Jeff Penton and Shirley E. Nelson -Hill Revocable Trust have requested approval of a conditional use permit to allow a shared driveway for the properties generally located north of 122nd Street North and west of Jody Avenue North. WHEREAS, the subject properties are legally described as follows: (See attached) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said conditional use permit at a duly called public hearing on December 19, 2019, and recommends approval subject to the conditions listed in the conditional use permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the conditional use permit for a shared driveway on properties located generally located north of 122nd Street North and west of Jody Avenue North subject to the following conditions; 1. The Easement and Maintenance Agreement for the shared driveway shall be recorded at Washington County. 2. The applicant will be required to a wetland delineation for both properties. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6d' day of January 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk EXHIBIT A The Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter (SW 1/4 NE 1/4), Section 36, Township 31, Range 21, except those portions previously conveyed. Previously conveyed parcels are described in doc. No 3477802 as: All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County Minnesota that is described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner on the Northeast 1/4 of Section 36; thence South 0°31'04" East, on a assumed bearing, along the East line of said Northeast 1/4 for a distance of 1042.90 feet; thence North 60°22'04" West a distance of 527.15 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described, said point of beginning also being the centerline of Keller Avenue (County Road No. 57) as improved; thence continuing North 60°22'04" West a distance of 992.46 feet; thence South 21°52'12" West a distance of 1131.06 feet; thence South 89010'58" thence West, a distance of 228.74 feet to the Northwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 36; thence South 0022'46" East, along the West line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a distance of 593.90 feet; thence North 89°10'58" East, parallel the South line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, a distance of 700.29 feet to the centerline of said Keller Avenue; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a non- tangential curve concave to the East and having a central angle of 1°25'21" with a radius of 763.74 feet for an arc distance of 18.96 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 11050'07" East; thence North 12032'47" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 311.51 feet; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Southeast and having a central angle of 35005'49" with a radius of 533.32 feet for an arc distance of 326.69 feet; thence North 47°38'36" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 603.07 feet; thence Northeast along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Northwest and having a central angle of 8035'50" with a radius of 1256.36 feet for an arc distance of 189.61 feet to the point of beginning. And described in doc. No 465812 as: The South 662 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota EXHIBIT B Government Lot 2, Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, together with a perpetual easement over, under and across the following described property: North half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota lying East of a line 66 feet West and parallel to the West line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 36; Excepted from the above conveyance the following described property: All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner on the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 36; thence south 0°31'04" East, on an assumed bearing, along the East line of said Northeast 1/4 for a distance of 1042.90 feet; thence North 60°22'04" West a distance of 527.15 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described, said point of beginning also being the centerline of Keller Avenue (County Road No. 57) as improved; thence continuing North 60°22'04" West a distance of 992.46 feet; thence South 21°52'12" West a distance of 1131.06 feet; thence South 89°10'58" West, a distance of 228.74 feet to the Northwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 36; thence South 0°22'46" East, along the West line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, a distance of 593.90 feet; thence North 89°10'58" East, parallel with the South line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, a distance of 700.29 feet to the centerline of said Keller Avenue; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a nontangential curve concave to the East and having a central angle of 1°25'21" with a radius of 763.71 feet for an arc distance of 18.96 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 11°50'07" East; thence North 12°32'47" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 311.51 feet; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Southeast and having a central angle of 35°05'49" with a radius of 533.32 feet for an arc distance of 326.69 feet; thence North 47°38'36" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 326.69 feet; thence North 47°38'36" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 603.07 feet; thence Northeast along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Northwest and having a central angle of 8°35'50" with a radius of 1256.36 feet for an arc distance of 189.61 feet to the point of beginning; and Except That part of Government Lot Seven (7) in Section Twenty-five (25) and Government Lot Two (2) in Section Thirty-six (36), all in said Township Thirty-one (31) North, of Range Twenty-one (21) West, Washington County, Minnesota, described jointly as follows: Beginning at the north quarter corner of said Section Thirty-six (36); thence 179°39'59 assumed azimuth from North along the north -south quarter line of said Section Thirty-six (36), a distance of Five Hundred and One Hundredth (500.01) feet; thence 77049'50" to the shoreline of South School Section Lake, thence northwesterly; northerly and westerly along said shoreline to the point of intersection with a straight line drawn between the north and south quarter corners of said Section Twenty-five (25); thence southerly along said straight line to the point of beginning. Subject to County State Aid Highway No. 8A (also known as 1301h Street North and Jody Avenue North). Subject to and together with any other valid easements, restrictions and reservations. According to the United States Government Survey thereof. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DATE OF APPROVAL: January 6, 2020 OWNERS: Jeff and Kelly Penton Shirley E. Nelson -Hill Revocable Trust LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR WHICH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS GRANTED: (See attached) ZONING DISTRICT: Agricultural THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWS FOR THE FOLLOWING: A shared driveway for properties located generally north of 122nd Street North and west of Jody Avenue North are subject to the following conditions: Prior to issuance of a driveway or building permit: 1. A wetland delineation will be required for both properties. 2. The Easement and Maintenance Agreement shall be reviewed and approved by staff. The applicant shall record the Easement and Maintenance Agreement at Washington County once it is approved by City staff. 3. The applicant will need to demonstrate that the area of the proposed shared driveway will not impact any wetlands. If wetlands are proposed to be impacted the applicant shall move the location of the driveway so there would not be impact or acquire the proper permits for impacting a wetland. Tom Weidt, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this day of , 2020, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Tom Weidt Mayor of the City of Hugo, a Minnesota municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Hugo by the authority of the City Council of the City of Hugo, and Tom Weidt acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City of Hugo. Notary Public Jeff Penton Kelly Penton STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this day of , 2020, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Jeff and Kelly Penton, husband and wife, to me known as the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, who stated that they are the owners of the property this permit applies to, and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public Trustee, Shirley E. Nelson -Hill Revocable Trust STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this day of , 2020, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _'Trustee of the Shirley E. Nelson -Hill Revocable Trust, to me known as the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, who stated that they are the owners of the property this permit applies to, and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY THE CITY OF HUGO 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 EXHIBIT A The Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter (SW 1/4 NE 1/4), Section 36, Township 31, Range 21, except those portions previously conveyed. Previously conveyed parcels are described in doc. No 3477802 as: All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County Minnesota that is described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner on the Northeast 1/4 of Section 36; thence South 0°31'04" East, on a assumed bearing, along the East line of said Northeast 1/4 for a distance of 1042.90 feet; thence North 60°22'04" West a distance of 527.15 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described, said point of beginning also being the centerline of Keller Avenue (County Road No. 57) as improved; thence continuing North 60°22'04" West a distance of 992.46 feet; thence South 21°52'12" West a distance of 1131.06 feet; thence South 89010'58" thence West, a distance of 228.74 feet to the Northwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 36; thence South 0022'46" East, along the West line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a distance of 593.90 feet; thence North 89°10'58" East, parallel the South line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, a distance of 700.29 feet to the centerline of said Keller Avenue; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a non- tangential curve concave to the East and having a central angle of 1°25'21" with a radius of 763.74 feet for an arc distance of 18.96 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 11050'07" East; thence North 12032'47" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 311.51 feet; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Southeast and having a central angle of 35005'49" with a radius of 533.32 feet for an arc distance of 326.69 feet; thence North 47°38'36" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 603.07 feet; thence Northeast along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Northwest and having a central angle of 8035'50" with a radius of 1256.36 feet for an arc distance of 189.61 feet to the point of beginning. And described in doc. No 465812 as: The South 662 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota EXHIBIT B Government Lot 2, Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, together with a perpetual easement over, under and across the following described property: North half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota lying East of a line 66 feet West and parallel to the West line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 36; Excepted from the above conveyance the following described property: All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner on the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 36; thence south 0°31'04" East, on an assumed bearing, along the East line of said Northeast 1/4 for a distance of 1042.90 feet; thence North 60°22'04" West a distance of 527.15 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described, said point of beginning also being the centerline of Keller Avenue (County Road No. 57) as improved; thence continuing North 60°22'04" West a distance of 992.46 feet; thence South 21°52'12" West a distance of 1131.06 feet; thence South 89°10'58" West, a distance of 228.74 feet to the Northwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 36; thence South 0°22'46" East, along the West line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, a distance of 593.90 feet; thence North 89°10'58" East, parallel with the South line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, a distance of 700.29 feet to the centerline of said Keller Avenue; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a nontangential curve concave to the East and having a central angle of 1°25'21" with a radius of 763.71 feet for an arc distance of 18.96 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 11°50'07" East; thence North 12°32'47" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 311.51 feet; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Southeast and having a central angle of 35°05'49" with a radius of 533.32 feet for an arc distance of 326.69 feet; thence North 47°38'36" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 326.69 feet; thence North 47°38'36" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 603.07 feet; thence Northeast along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Northwest and having a central angle of 8°35'50" with a radius of 1256.36 feet for an arc distance of 189.61 feet to the point of beginning; and Except That part of Government Lot Seven (7) in Section Twenty-five (25) and Government Lot Two (2) in Section Thirty-six (36), all in said Township Thirty-one (31) North, of Range Twenty-one (21) West, Washington County, Minnesota, described jointly as follows: Beginning at the north quarter corner of said Section Thirty-six (36); thence 179°39'59 assumed azimuth from North along the north -south quarter line of said Section Thirty-six (36), a distance of Five Hundred and One Hundredth (500.01) feet; thence 77049'50" to the shoreline of South School Section Lake, thence northwesterly; northerly and westerly along said shoreline to the point of intersection with a straight line drawn between the north and south quarter corners of said Section Twenty-five (25); thence southerly along said straight line to the point of beginning. Subject to County State Aid Highway No. 8A (also known as 1301h Street North and Jody Avenue North). Subject to and together with any other valid easements, restrictions and reservations. According to the United States Government Survey thereof. Agenda Number D.3 CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Hugo Planning Commission FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Wayne Scanlan. Variance and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) request for properties located south of 177th Street and west of Henna Avenue North. DATE: December 12, 2019, for the Planning Commission Meeting of December 19, 2019 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Agricultural (AG) ZONING: Future Urban Service (FUS) REVIEW DEADLINE: 120 -days — March 5, 2020 1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval a variance for the property located at 17530 Henna Avenue North for the property to have 0 feet from street frontage, where 300 feet is required by ordinance. The property is an existing land locked parcel with an existing home. The applicant is also requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for shared driveway that provides access to 3 parcels, parcels A, B, and C (17530 Henna Avenue North, 17590 Henna Avenue North, and 7355 177th Street North,). Shared driveways require approval of a CUP. The shared driveway is already established and has been used to access the properties for several years. In addition, the applicant is requesting that an existing covenant be released that is against the properties at 7355 177th Street North and 17530 Henna Avenue North. The covenant states that the these properties shall be considered as one lot and cannot be sold separately. 2. BACKGROUND: In 1994, the applicant received approval for a minor subdivision of parcels A and B, which was one 20 acre lot at that time. The applicant also received approval to have a shared driveway over parcel B to access parcel A. The applicant owns parcel C and in an effort to not need a variance for the landlocked parcel A, the applicant agreed to combine parcel A and C. Washington County would not allow the lot combination because the parcels are in separate Sections. The City then required a covenant to be recorded against parcel A and C to be considered as one lot and that Scanlan Variance and CUP they cannot be sold separately. The applicant remains the owner of parcel A and C, parcel B is owned by separate owner. Parcel A and B both had homes on the properties. In 1999, the applicant built a house on parcel C. It was permitted by the City by the issuance of a building permit. From that time, Parcel A and C have been taxed and used as separate parcels. The applicant is now requesting approval of the variance and CUP and to have the covenants released so they can be sold separately. 3. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The properties and surrounding properties are zoned Future Urban Service (FUS) and are large lots with single family homes. The properties are guided Agricultural (AG) in the 2040 Land Use Plan. 4. LEVEL OF DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards in the ordinance. The City's discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or not the proposed application meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the conditional use permit. 5. ANALYSIS: A. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Variance Request The applicant is requesting approval a variance for the property located at 17530 Henna Avenue North for the property to have 0 feet from street frontage, where 300 feet is required by ordinance. The property is an existing land locked parcel. The Planning Commission must review the requested variances with the standards outlined in Section 90-38 of the land use regulations. Staff used these standards to review the variance request and finds the following: (1) Law. The variance as requested is permissible by law. The proposed variance is permissible by law. Scanlan Variance and CUP (2) Practical Difficulties. The applicant for a variance shall establish that there are practical difficulties in complying with the provisions of the zoning regulations. The term "Practical Difficulties" as used in the granting of a variance means: a. Reasonable Use. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance and; The applicant is proposing to use the property for a single family home. This is reasonable use of the property as it is consistent with how the properties have been used for several years. b. Unique Circumstances. The plight of property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner and; Parcel A has a separate tax identification number and has been used as a separate parcel for several years. Although the property has a covenant against it to be combined with parcel C, it is unique in that is has a home on it and has been used as a separate parcels for several years. c. Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The variance will not noticeably change the character of the area. It is in staff's opinion that there are practical difficulties in meeting the ordinance standards. (3) Spirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this chapter and with the policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to ensure parcels in the FUS zoning have adequate street frontage for access to the parcel. The property does have approval to cross parcel B with a shared driveway to access the parcel. The property has adequate access to a public street and meets the spirit and intent of the ordinance. (4) Prohibited Use. The variance, if granted, shall not have the effect of allowing any use prohibited in the district. The use is allowed in the FUS zoning district. (S) Hazard Consideration. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood protection than required by this chapter. The variance shall be determined the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief, and the variance shall not be issued within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. The property is not located within a floodplain area. Scanlan Variance and CUP (6) Septic and Well Compliance. The sewage treatment system and water system of the subject property is in compliance with city and state codes. The property is served by well and a septic system. CUP Request The applicant is also requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for shared driveway that provides access to 3 parcels, parcels A, B, and C (17530 Henna Avenue North, 17590 Henna Avenue North, and 7355 177th Street North,). Shared driveways require approval of a CUP. The shared driveway is already established and has been used to access the properties for several years. Staff used these standards to review the application and found that the request meets all applicable standards as follows: 1. The proposed use is permissible by law. The proposed use is allowed by conditional use permit. 2. The proposed use is keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The proposed use is allowed in the FUS zoning district and will keep with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, which is intended to allow a shared driveway by a CUP as long as they comply with the regulations. 3. The proposed use is compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the character of the surrounding area. The use is existing and is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and the addition will not alter the character of the area. 4. The proposed use has adequate drainage, water supply, electrical, gas, and sewage treatment facilities. The proposed use has adequate drainage, water supply, and utilities. 5. The proposed use has adequate road access. The property has adequate road access to Henna Avenue North. 6. Technical Evaluation of Floodplain. The applicant is not proposing to impact any floodplain. 7. The proposed use should not increase the potential for flood damage. Scanlan Variance and CUP The proposed use would not obstruct the floodplain or increase the potential for flooding. 8. The proposed use will not damage or reduce the benefits the public receives from public waters. The proposed use would not damage or reduce the benefits from any public waters. 9. The use of watercraft on public waters. The proposed use would not involve the use of watercraft on public waters. 10. All structures shall be screened from view of public waters. The proposed use is not visible from public waters. 11. Wetland impacts. The driveway is existing and does not adversely impact any wetlands. 12. All state and local permits shall be acquired for the conditional use. The applicant would be responsible for obtaining all state and local permits. 13. Adequate screening and buffering from non -compatible uses and public rights-of-way. The proposed use is not visible from non -compatible uses and public right-of-ways. It's in staff's opinion that the request meets all the items required to approve a CUP. It is a condition of approval that the easement area and maintenance agreement will need to be reviewed and approved for the existing driveway. 6. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It's in staff's opinion that the request meets all the items required for a variance and CUP. Staff recommends approval of the variance and CUP subject to the conditions listed in the attached draft resolutions to the Planning Commission. Staff recommends approval of the release of the covenant against parcel A and C, if the variance and CUP are approved with the conditions listed in the resolutions. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Approving Resolutions (3) T �CFFY OF WEST. 18VV06 Scanlon Variance and CUP Request Location Map Hugo, MN N 0 500 Feet 1 in = 500 feet RESOLUTION 2020 - APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE STREET FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR A PARCEL LOCATED AT 17530 HENNA AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, Wayne Scanlan has requested approval of a variance request to allow a parcel to have 0 feet of road frontage, where 300 feet is required by ordinance for the property legally described as follows: See Attached WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said variance at a duly called public hearing on December 19, 2019, and recommends approval with the following findings and conditions: 1. Parcel ID 03.031.21.32.0002 and 04.031.21.41.0002 shall be combined into one lot. 2. The proposed variance is permissible by law. 3. The applicant is proposing to use the property for a single family home. This is reasonable use of the property as it is consistent with how the properties have been used for several years. 4. Parcel A has a separate tax identification number and has been used as a separate parcel for several years. Although the property has a covenant against it to be combined with parcel C, it is unique in that is has a home on it and has been used as a separate parcels for several years. 5. The variance will not noticeably change the character of the area. 6. There are practical difficulties in meeting the ordinance standards. 7. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to ensure parcels in the FUS zoning have adequate street frontage for access to the parcel. The property does have approval cross parcel B with a shared driveway to access the parcel. The property has adequate access to a public street and meets the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 8. The property is not located within a floodplain area. 9. The property is served by well and a septic system. Resolution 2020 - Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the variance request for Wayne Scanlan to allow a parcel to have 0 feet of road frontage, where 300 feet is required by ordinance. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6�h day of January, 2020 Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Legal Description That part of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 3, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying West of the East 665 feet thereof. Excluding Horseshoe Lake. Including all Riparian Rights. Subject to and together with any other valid easements, restrictions and reservations. RESOLUTION 2020 - APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SHARED DRIVEWAY FOR THE PROPERTIES GENERALY LOCATED SOUTH OF 177TH STREET NORTH AND WEST OF HENNA AVENUE WHEREAS, Wayne Scanlan, Jodie Alwin, and Brent and Jane Krause have requested approval of a conditional use permit to allow a shared driveway for the properties generally located at 7355 177th Street North, 17530 Henna Avenue North, and 17590 Henna Avenue. WHEREAS, the subject properties are legally described as follows: (See attached) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said conditional use permit at a duly called public hearing on December 19, 2019, and recommends approval subject to the conditions listed in the conditional use permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the conditional use permit for a shared driveway on properties located at 7355 177th Street North, 17530 Henna Avenue North, and 17590 Henna Avenue. subject to the following conditions; 1. The Easement and Maintenance Agreement for the shared driveway shall be recorded at Washington County. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6th day of January 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Legal Descriptions—CUP Parcel A That part of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 3, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying West of the East 665 feet thereof. Excluding Horseshoe Lake. Including all Riparian Rights. Parcel B The East 665 feet of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 3, Township 31, North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota. Subject to Henna Avenue North. Subject to an easement for ingress and egress over and across the North 40 feet of the South 135 feet of the above described parcel. Subject to and together with any other valid easements, restrictions and reservations. Parcel C Government Lots one (1) and two (2) of Section four (4), Township Thirty-one {31), Range twenty-one (21) West, Washington County, Minnesota, containing fifty-five (55) acres more or less, according to the Government survey thereof, EXCEPT THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING: That part of Government Lot two (2), Section four (4), Township thirty-one (31) North, Range twenty- one (21) West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Government Lot two (2), Section four (4); thence West along the north line of Government Lot two (2), a distance of nine hundred twenty-five and three hundredths {925.3) feet more or less, to the point of intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant nine hundred twenty-five (925) feet West of the East line of Government Lot two (2); thence continuing West along the North line of Government Lot two (2) a distance of three hundred ninety-four (394) feet, more or less, to the West line of Government Lot two (2) thence Southerly along the West line of Government Lot two (2), a distance of seven hundred forty-five (745) feet, more or less, to the shoreline of Horseshoe Lake; thence Easterly and Northeasterly along the shoreline of Horseshoe Lake a distance of four hundred and twenty (420) feet, more or less, to the point of intersection with said line drawn parallel with and distant nine hundred twenty-five (925) feet West of the East line of Government Lot two (2), thence Northerly along said parallel line distance of six hundred twenty-three (623) feet more or less, to the point of beginning, containing 6.5 acres more or less, and subject to an existing township road along the North line thereof. RESOLUTION NO. 2020- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE RELEASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR A PROPERTIES LOCATED GENERALLY SOUTH OF 177TH STREET NORTH AND WEST OF HENNA AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, on March 7, 1994, the City Council approved a minor subdivision of a twenty acre parcel into two ten acre parcels; WHEREAS, the approval required the combination of the parcels legally described below; See attached WHEREAS, Washington County declined the parcel combination; WHEREAS, on February 21, 1995, the City Council approved and entered into a development agreement and restrictive covenant which states that the properties shall be considered as one lot and cannot be sold separate and the document is recorded in Washington County as document number 840822; WHEREAS, the properties have been used and taxed as separate parcels; WHEREAS, the property owner has requested the properties be released from the development agreement and restrictive covenant; WHEREAS, on January 6, 2020, the property owner received approval of a variance and conditional use permit from the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUGO: 1. The properties are released from the development agreement and restrictive covenant. Council members voting AYE: Council members voting NAY: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted this 6th day of January, 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Parcel A That part of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 3, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying west of the East 665 feet thereof. Also that part of Government Lot 1 of said Section 3, described as follows: Beginning at the west quarter corner of Section 3; thence southerly, along the west line of Section 3, a distance of 356 feet; thence northeasterly, deflecting 144 degrees 55 minutes to the left, a distance of 435 feet, more or less, to the east -west quarter line of Section 3; thence westerly, along said quarter line, a distance of 250 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Excluding Horseshoe Lake. Including all Riparian Rights. Together with an easement for ingress and egress over and across the East 665 feet of North 40 of the South 135 feet of said South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter. Subject to and together with any other valid easements, restrictions and reservations. Parcel B The East 665 feet of the South Half of the southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 3, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota. Subject to Henna Avenue North. Subject to an easement for ingress and egress over and across the North 40 feet of the South 135 feet of the above described parcel. Subject to and together with any other valid easements, restrictions and reservations. Parcel C Government Lot 1, Section 4, Township 31, Range 21, Hugo, Washington County, Minnesota. O Government Lot 2, Section 4, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota, EXCEPT: That part of Government Lot Two (2), Section Four (4), Township Thirty -One (31) North, Range Twenty -One (21) West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows:_ Commencing at the Northeast corner of- Government Lot Two (2), Section Four (4); thence West along the north line of Government Lot Two ( 2) , a distance of Nine Hundred Twenty -Five and Three Hundredths (925.3) feet more or less, to the point of intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant Nine Hundred Twenty -Five (925) feet West of the East line of Government Lot Two (2) ; thence continuing West along the North line of Government Lot Two ( 2 ) a distance of Three Hundred Ninety -Four (394) feet, more or less, to the West line of Government Lot Two (2), thence Southerly along the west line of Government Lot Two (2), a distance of Seven Hundred Forty -- Five (745) feet, more or less, to the shoreline of Horseshoe Lake; thence Easterly and Northeasterly along the shoreline of Horseshoe Lake a distance of Four Hundred and Twenty (420) feet, more or less, to the point of intersection with said line drawn parallel with and distant Nine Hundred Twenty-five ( 925 ) feet West of the East line of Government Lot Two ( 2) ; thence Northerly along said parallel line a distance of Six Hundred Twenty -Three (623) feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, containing 6.5 acres, more or less, and subject to an existing township road along the North line thereof. Agenda Number: DA CITY OF HUGO PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Hugo Planning Commission FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: OP5 Adelaide (Excelsior Group) — Adelaide Landing PUD Amendment DATE: December 11, 2019 for the Planning Commission meeting of December 19, 2019 ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD) LAND USE: Low Density Residential (LD) DEADLINE DATE: 120 -days — February 8, 2020 1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a PUD Amendment to revise the building setbacks for the 50 -foot wide single family lots on the northern portion of the development. There are 51 lots approved in the area with the preliminary plat, the total number of lots will not change. The approved and proposed setbacks are in the table below: 50 foot Wide 50 foot Wide Lots Lots Approved Proposed Front Setback (min) 25 Ft 25 Ft Front Setback (min) 25 Ft 20 Ft for side of the home on corner lots Side Setback min 7.5 Ft 5 Ft Rear Setback min 30 Ft 25 Ft Page 2 2. BACKGROUND: The applicant has approval of a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a residential development. The property totals 216.6 acres. The property includes wetlands and floodplain for a total buildable acreage of 146.2 acres. The development was approved to include 324 single family residential lots. The applicant received PUD flexibility on the following during the PUD General Plan approval in 2017: • Flexibility to allow various lot sized with a minimum lot size of 5,850 square feet, where 10,400 square feet is required. • Flexibility to allow various lot width with a minimum lot width of 45 feet, were 80 feet is required by ordinance. • Flexibility to allow a minimum front setback of 20 feet (for side loaded garages), where 30 feet is required. • Flexibility to allow a minimum rear setback of 25 feet, where 30 feet is required. • Flexibility to allow a minimum side yard setback of 7.5 feet, where 10 feet is required. • Flexibility to allow a maximum impervious coverage of a lot to be 55%, where 50% is required. • Flexibility to allow a minimum right-of-way width of 50 feet, where 60 feet is required. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer has: • Designed a more sensitive proposal, with less density, than would have been the case with the use of the standard R-3 zoning district. • Provided a public park within the development, with improvements that exceed City standards. • Provided a public trail to connect to existing trails in the adjacent developments. Preserving and enhancing natural features with the trail system that meanders through the development. • Provided a landscaping plan that exceeds City standards. • Preserved existing significant trees on the property. • Created a stormwater reuse irrigation project within the development. • Incorporated architectural design guidelines for the homes in the development 3. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding land Use and Zoning The property to the north is zoned Low Density Multiple Family Residential (R-4) and occupied by the Pineview Meadows townhome development. The properties to the east, south, and west are zoned Single Family Detached Residential (R-3) and occupied by the Country Ponds, Beaver Ponds, and Birch Tree Ponds residential developments. The properties to the west, across Highway 61, are zoning General Industrial (1-3) and are occupied by industrial uses. There are Page 3 also a few vacant parcels to the east that are also zoned Single Family Detached Residential (R- 3). B. Natural Characteristics of Site The properties are currently vacant and do contain some challenges regarding an existing drainage ditch, floodplain, and high ground water. The properties are relatively flat with approximately 57 acres of wetlands. 4. ANALYSIS: A. Level of Discretion in Decision Making The City has relatively high level of discretion in approving a PUD. A PUD must be consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Planned Unit Development The 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows the land use being Low Density Residential (LD). The PUD is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in terms of land use and density. The Adelaide Landing PUD general plan has offered a creative and efficient method to planning the site, all which meets the intent of the PUD ordinance. It is in staff's opinion that the PUD amendment meets the intent of the PUD ordinance, and is consistent with the PUD general plan. Lot Sizes and Setbacks The applicant is requesting a change in the setbacks for the 50 -foot wide lots. Although the applicant is requesting the minimum side yard setback to be 5 feet (10 feet between homes), the majority of the buildings will have a 6 foot side yard setback (12 feet between homes). There are 3 instances where there are 10 feet between buildings, Lot 8, Block 2; Lot 5, 50 foot Wide 50 foot Wide Lots Lots Approved Proposed Front Setback (min) 25 Ft 25 Ft Front Setback (min) 25 Ft 20 Ft for side of the home on corner lots Side Setback min 7.5 Ft 5 Ft Rear Setback min 30 Ft 25 Ft Although the applicant is requesting the minimum side yard setback to be 5 feet (10 feet between homes), the majority of the buildings will have a 6 foot side yard setback (12 feet between homes). There are 3 instances where there are 10 feet between buildings, Lot 8, Block 2; Lot 5, Page 4 Block 3, and Lot 7 Block 5. The 10 feet between buildings will only occur at the closet points at the corners of the building not necessarily the entire length of the home. Staff recommends the following setbacks: The City of Hugo has approved a 5 foot side yard setback for certain homes in the Victor Gardens and Fable Hill developments. Villa Product Home Style The Villa product that the applicant is proposed to be built in this area is the same M/I Home Villa product that is currently being built in Adelaide Landing at the northeast corner of Highway 61 and 130th Street (55 foot wide lots). The applicant would like to build the same product on the 50 foot wide lots. There are examples in the packet of the elevations of the Villa product. The design has the garage flush with the front of the homes, so it is not a garage forward/dominate design. This product is maintenance provided (mowing, landscaping, and snow removal) by the home owners association. Density The maximum development density for a PUD in the R-3 zoning district is 4 units per 1 acre. The applicant is proposing a residential net density of 2.2 units per 1 acre, which fits the requirements of a PUD. Although the applicant has requested flexibility on lot sizes and setbacks, the density meets the ordinance standards. Landscaping In exchange for additional flexibility the applicant has provided a revised landscape plan that includes additional landscaping along the north and west sides, than what was previously approved with the development. Staff recommends additional landscaping for a buffer with a combination of deciduous and coniferous trees. The final landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff. 50 foot Wide Lots Front Setback (min) 25 Ft Front Setback (min) for side of the 20 Ft home on corner lots Side Setback (min) 6 Ft Side Setback (min) Lot 8, Block 2; 5 Ft Lot 5, Block 3, and Lot 7 Block 5 Rear Setback (min) 25 Ft The City of Hugo has approved a 5 foot side yard setback for certain homes in the Victor Gardens and Fable Hill developments. Villa Product Home Style The Villa product that the applicant is proposed to be built in this area is the same M/I Home Villa product that is currently being built in Adelaide Landing at the northeast corner of Highway 61 and 130th Street (55 foot wide lots). The applicant would like to build the same product on the 50 foot wide lots. There are examples in the packet of the elevations of the Villa product. The design has the garage flush with the front of the homes, so it is not a garage forward/dominate design. This product is maintenance provided (mowing, landscaping, and snow removal) by the home owners association. Density The maximum development density for a PUD in the R-3 zoning district is 4 units per 1 acre. The applicant is proposing a residential net density of 2.2 units per 1 acre, which fits the requirements of a PUD. Although the applicant has requested flexibility on lot sizes and setbacks, the density meets the ordinance standards. Landscaping In exchange for additional flexibility the applicant has provided a revised landscape plan that includes additional landscaping along the north and west sides, than what was previously approved with the development. Staff recommends additional landscaping for a buffer with a combination of deciduous and coniferous trees. The final landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff. Page 5 The rear yard setbacks of the homes along the existing neighborhoods will be more than the proposed 25 foot rear yard setback. The rear yard setback for those lots will be between 35 feet and 70 feet. The PUD amended is also related to the plans that are received by the City and will need to meet the proposed plans. 5. CONCLUSION: Staff is recommending the following setbacks for the PUD Amendment: Staff believes that the layout of the proposed Adelaide Landing PUD general plan exceeds the City's standards for residential developments. The developer has offered a more creative and efficient approach to the existing constraints of the property through the site design layout. The PUD amendment is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the approved Adelaide Landing PUD. It is in staff's opinion that the applicant meets all the requirements necessary to approve the PUD amendment. 6. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the PUD amendment OP5 Adelaide (Excelsior Group) for the development to be known as "Adelaide Landing", subject to the conditions listed in the resolutions. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location map 2. Resolution 3. Applicants Narrative Dated December 13, 2019 4. Approved PUD General Plan March 3, 2017 5. Proposed PUD General Plan October 8, 2019 6. Proposed Grading Plan dated October 2, 2018, revised, November 4, 2019 7. Revised Landscape Plan dated December 12, 2019 8. Building Elevations from M/I Homes 9. Examples of Buildings/Developments using a 4 Ft Side Yard Setbacks in other Communities 50 foot Wide Lots Front Setback (min) 25 Ft Front Setback (min) for side of the 20 Ft home on corner lots Side Setback (min) 6 Ft Side Setback (min) Lot 8, Block 2; 5 Ft Lot 5, Block 3, and Lot 7 Block S Rear Setback (min) 25 Ft Staff believes that the layout of the proposed Adelaide Landing PUD general plan exceeds the City's standards for residential developments. The developer has offered a more creative and efficient approach to the existing constraints of the property through the site design layout. The PUD amendment is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the approved Adelaide Landing PUD. It is in staff's opinion that the applicant meets all the requirements necessary to approve the PUD amendment. 6. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the PUD amendment OP5 Adelaide (Excelsior Group) for the development to be known as "Adelaide Landing", subject to the conditions listed in the resolutions. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location map 2. Resolution 3. Applicants Narrative Dated December 13, 2019 4. Approved PUD General Plan March 3, 2017 5. Proposed PUD General Plan October 8, 2019 6. Proposed Grading Plan dated October 2, 2018, revised, November 4, 2019 7. Revised Landscape Plan dated December 12, 2019 8. Building Elevations from M/I Homes 9. Examples of Buildings/Developments using a 4 Ft Side Yard Setbacks in other Communities 1 t - Site i i JR '�..'.. Roads 'tr B1 Hugo Border L—— Parcel Boundary a J- N ,CITY OF Adelaide Landing PUD Amendment Tr� Location Map 0 700 11VVV EST.19oe Hugo, MN Feet 1 in = 700 feet RESOLUTION 2020 - APPROVING PUD AMENDMENT FOR OP5 ADELAIDE (EXCELSIOR GROUP) FOR "ADELAIDE LANDING" ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF HIGHWAY 61 AND NORTH OF 130TH STREET WHEREAS, OP5 Adelaide, has requested approval of a PUD amendment to allow a revision to the general plan to reduce the side yard and rear yard setbacks for the 50 foot wide lots on the property legally described as follows: Outlot B, Adelaide Landing WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the PUD amendment at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by OP5 Adelaide, subject to the following conditions: 1. A PUD Amendment is approved to revise the setbacks to the following: , in accordance with the plans received on October 11, 2019, November 21, 2019, and December 13, 2019, except as amended by this resolution. 2. PUD flexibility is granted allow the changes shown on the November 21, 2019 and December 13, 2019, plans, except as amended by this resolution. 3. The development shall be subject to the conditions of the May 1, 2017 PUD and preliminary plat approvals (Resolution 2017-10 and 2017-11) except as amended by this resolution. 4. The PUD general plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Adelaide Landing PUD. 50 foot Wide Lots Front Setback (min) 25 Ft Front Setback (min) for side of the 20 Ft home on corner lots Side Setback (min) 6 Ft Side Setback (min) Lot 8, Block 2; 5 Ft Lot 5, Block 3, and Lot 7 Block 5 Rear Setback (min) 25 Ft , in accordance with the plans received on October 11, 2019, November 21, 2019, and December 13, 2019, except as amended by this resolution. 2. PUD flexibility is granted allow the changes shown on the November 21, 2019 and December 13, 2019, plans, except as amended by this resolution. 3. The development shall be subject to the conditions of the May 1, 2017 PUD and preliminary plat approvals (Resolution 2017-10 and 2017-11) except as amended by this resolution. 4. The PUD general plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Adelaide Landing PUD. Resolution 2020 - Page 2 5. The developer must comply with the following, prior to Final Plat and Final PUD Plan application: 6. The plans shall be revised to include items that are amended with this resolution. Landscaping and Sidewalks a. The landscape plan shall be revised to include additional tree for buffer to existing neighborhoods. The final landscape plans must be submitted for review and approval by staff. b. The plans shall be revised to add a sidewalk connecting to 137th Street. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6th of January, 2020 Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk ADELAIDE LANDING Hugo, Minnesota PUD AMENDMENT NARRATIVE October 11, 2019 The City of Hugo City Council approved the preliminary plat and PUD for Adelaide Landing on May 1, 2017. The PUD general plan was approved to allow the creation of 319 single family residential lots and 10 outlots. In May 2019, a PUD Amendment was approved to 5 lots, and change the approved 75' wide lots to 65' wide lots. A total of 324 lots are approved for Adelaide Landing. OP5 Adelaide, LLC has been developing Adelaide Landing per the approved Preliminary Plat and PUD since 2017. Currently, 1", 2nd, 3`d, and 4' Additions are substantially completed with 192 finished lots in the process of being purchased for home construction by our builder partners, MI Homes, Creative Homes and Derrick Custom Homes. There are two future planned additions to be completed over the next few years. OP5 Adelaide anticipates bringing a 5`h Addition Final Plat forward for construction to begin Spring 2020. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST OP5 Adelaide is requesting a PUD Amendment to address changes to the future development of the 50' wide villa lots on the Northwest corner of the site. In order to meet market demands, OP5 Adelaide is requesting a PUD Amendment to include the following: • Minimum Side Setback of 5 feet on the future villa product in the Northwest corner of the project. Currently, 7.5 feet is the approved minimum side setback under the approved PUD. • Minimum Rear Setback of 25', which matches the approved rear setback for the completed villas on the south side of Adelaide Landing. Currently, 30' is the approved rear setback. • Side Setback at Corners of 20', which matches the approved corner side setback for the completed villas on the south side of Adelaide Landing. Currently, 25' is approved. All other PUD requirements as originally approved will remain in place, including lot count of 324. Below is a comparison of the current approved PUD requirements vs. proposed PUD Amendment: Approved Villa Lots (South) Approved Villa Lots (North) Proposed 50' Villa Lots (North) Min Lot Area 5,850 SF 6,513 SF 6,344 SF Avg Lot Area 7,601 SF 8,138 SF 8,246 SF Lot Width (min) 45 Ft 50 Ft 50 Ft Lot Depth (min) 130 Ft 130 Ft 130 Ft Front Setback (min) 20 Ft — Side Load Garage 25 Ft — Front Load Garage 25 Ft 25 Ft Side Setback (min) 7.5 Ft 7.5 Ft 5 Ft Rear Setback (min) 25 Ft 30 Ft 30 Ft Lot Impervious (max) 55% 50% 50% Adelaide Landing PUD Amendment - Narrative FUTURE VILLA PRODUCT MI Homes will be the builder of this north villa neighborhood within Adelaide Landing. As previously planned, this villa product will become part of the existing Adelaide Landing Villa HOA consisting of the villa product within 1" and 2nd Addition. MI Homes is the builder on all the current villa product within Adelaide Landing and expects to construct a similar product on the future villa product. Currently, MI is building a 40' wide home on a 55' wide lot with 7.5' side setbacks in the south villa area (15` and 2nd Additions). This PUD Amendment will allow MI to construct the same 40' wide home as they are currently building. This PUD Amendment is requesting a minimum lot width of 50' with a minimum side setback of 5'. The majority of the 51 lots in this north villa area will be 52' wide lots with a side setback of 6'. The exception to the 52' width and 6' side setbacks are the 3 lots shown highlighted on the attached color rendering (Lot 8 Block 2, Lot 5 Block 4, and Lot 7 Block 5). These will meet the minimum 50' width and 5' side setbacks. The reason for this proposed PUD Amendment is to allow MI to continue with this current product, as it has been proven with the south villas to be a high demand product in this market. Furthermore, it has been a positive addition to the Adelaide Landing community and the City of Hugo. This product fits in with the attached product to the north of Adelaide Landing. We plan to provide a landscaped entrance feature at both the 137`x' St. N. and Flay Ave. N. entrances. Elevations from MI Homes will be provided as part of this application. PROJECT CONTACTS Developer/Owner: Engineer/Wetlands/EAW: The Excelsior Group Steph Griffin, Development Manager steph.griffinoexcelsiorllc.com 952.525.3239 1660 Highway 100 South, Suite 400 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Westwood Professional Services John Bender, Project Manager John. Benderowestwoodps.com 952.697-5727 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Adelaide Landing PUD Amendment - Narrative Adelaide Landing Yfugo, -My ,11/I Ames Villa Homes M/I Homes will be the exclusive builder of the Villa Neighborhood. Villa Homes are single family homes with association maintenance of yards and snow removal. These homes meet the increasing demand for empty nesters households seeking single -level living with association maintenance. Villa Homes provide the benefits of a single family home, with all the conveniences of a townhome. The association maintenance of lawns and snow removal provides the homeowner with the freedom to travel, own a winter or summer home, or more time for recreation. M/I Homes assists each customer in selecting and designing a home that fits their particular needs. Individual homeowners have the ability to choose from a wide variety of plans, exterior materials, including extensive use of brick and stone, architectural features, and landscape designs. This process creates variety and interest in the architecture of the neighborhood. Required Setbacks The Villa Homes feature private outdoor patio spaces, a private yard, plentiful landscaping, and a homeowners association to take care of the exterior spaces. While the yard areas are maintained by the association, these homes sit on individual lots. This type of home with association maintenance requires flexibility from standard single family zoning requirements. The setbacks for these homes are: 1) 25 - foot front yard, 2) 5 -foot side yard, and 3) 25 -foot rear yard. The association is responsible to maintain the yards, and has easements over the lots for access and maintenance. Each homeowner also has access easements over adjacent lots for the purpose of maintenance and upkeep of their home. This gives every homeowner 10 feet of usable space on each side of their home. Under standard zoning, a homeowner would only have 7.5 feet. While this PUD Amendment is requesting changing the side setbacks from 7.5' to 5', 48 of the 51 villa lots will have side setbacks of 6'. In order to fit this product on 3 of the 51 lots, 5' side setbacks are required. These lots, highlighted on the color rendering, are Lot 7 Block 5, Lot 5 Block 3, and Lot 8 Block 2. It is important to note that the minimum side setback requested of 5' is only the closest point between homes and is not necessarily the entire length of each home. This application is also seeking an amendment from 30' rear yard setbacks to 25' rear yard setbacks and side setbacks at corners from 25' to 20'. Currently, in the existing south villas, we have 25' rear yard setbacks and 20' side setbacks at corners. This allows MI to provide the same product on the north villas as the south villas, which allows for an optional sunroom. Homeowner's Association Control The HOA for the Villa neighborhood not only maintains the exterior yards, but also controls and regulates individual lots within the neighborhood association. The HOA does not allow perimeter fences, sheds, or similar structures. Changes in landscaping are reviewed by the HOA to make sure changes protect and add privacy while taking into account future maintenance. Restrictions on outdoor storage, parking (no boats, campers, or trailers) keeps the neighborhood looking orderly and well maintained. The Association also controls exterior modifications and drainage. With smaller lots, it's more critical for homeowners and the Association to maintain pre -established drainage patterns, including drainage swales between homes. Homeowner Preference M/I Homes has constructed thousands of Villa Homes throughout the Twin Cities metro area. What we have learned in the process is that Villa buyers prefer a well-designed home with higher end finishes, variety in exterior architecture, and private outdoor spaces. Villa buyers are downsizing from a larger homes and want smaller spaces without the hassle of exterior maintenance. These buyers prefer to spend their money on the look of the home and the quality of the finishes, as opposed to buying a larger lot. Further, a larger lot drives up the cost of exterior maintenance and makes the association maintenance less affordable. Landscaping & Entrance This villa neighborhood will be the northerly entrance to Adelaide Landing. Therefore, we plan to install an enhanced buffer of a variety of trees along the project boundary to the north and west. This buffer will be similar to the buffer that includes a variety of coniferous and deciduous trees installed along the project boundary and 130th St. At the 137th St. entrance, a monument will be installed like the current monument at the main entrance to Adelaide Landing, but on a smaller scale. Furthermore, we anticipate working with the neighbors at the 137th St. entrance to remove the temporary cul de sac, restore yards, and install the entrance monument and landscaping. NM Homes Villa Neighborhoods M/I Homes is the largest builder of villa communities in the Twin Cities, we have developed villa neighborhoods in the following communities: city Lot Width Side Yard Setback Blaine 48 feet 4 feet Dayton 50 feet 5 feet Corcoran 50 feet 5 feet Minnetrista 50 feet 5 feet Carver 50 feet 5 feet Victoria 50 feet 5 feet Waconia 50 feet 5 feet Prior Lake 50 feet 4 feet Newport 50 feet 5 feet Lake Elmo 50 feet 4 feet Hudson 50 feet 4 feet Farmington 50 feet 4 feet Lakeville 50 feet 5 feet Hugo 55 feet 7.5 feet Villa communities are growing in popularity throughout the country given the aging population and the demand for single level living. Historically, the only option for single level living were attached townhomes and apartments. Many people want the conveniences of attached housing, but still desire a single family home. Villa homes are the perfect option for many looking for this type of lifestyle. However, price is a big factor as most want to downsize without taking on additional mortgage debt. Making sure that villa homes are "right sized" in terms of square footage and lot size are critical to a successful community. mat 11 1 ustrative PUD Amendment .1 " 'APPROVED APRIL 25, 2019 -j- V_L�__i!L i __J -!L__ _j wp� r, 'Ti ll LL — 4 ;` J1 ] ; APPROVED PROJECT DATA PROPOSED PROJECT DATA ii r r' / ,', i T T ii ii Gross Site Area: 216.6 ac Gross Site Area: 216.6 ac 3 h,� , Iooaa [11iI \ Collector Road ROW: 8.1 ac Collector Road ROW: 8.1 ac - ------------ CSAH 61: 3.4 ac. CSI 61 3.4 ac. Z j L `I itItA. F. 130th Street 4.7 ac. L. 130th Street: 4.7 ac. F" AL Existing Wetlands: 57.7 ac Existing Wetlands: 57.7 ac Floodzone( 100 yr): 4.6 ac Floodzone( 100 yr): 4.6 ac -------------- 1 / \.�� l I f (beyond wetland limits) (beyond wetland limits) -------------• Net Developable Area: 146.2 ac Net Developable Area: 146.2 ac 1�91,r f Park/Open Space: 111.0 ac Park/Open $pace: 111.0 ac (in (includesponds, parks, wetlands, wet buffers, road buffers, woods, etc.) includes ponds, parks, wetlands, wet buffers, road buffers, woods, etc.) J, P osed Residential Homes 319 lots Proposed Residential Homes 324 lots rop Pro p Det ace d Vi I I as Lot s: 83 lots Det ace d Vi I I as Lot s: 0 lots 50'Sngle Family Lots: 51 lots 50'Sngle Family Lots: 51 lots 55Sngle Family Lots: 0 lots 55` Single Family Lots: 81 lots 4W .'A65'Sngle Family Lots: 34 lots 65',9ngle Family Lots: 108 lots 4 7n,.qnn1P Fqmil\/ I nt-q• R1 Infiq 7n, qnnhn P-qmil\/ I ntcz• In intQ Fbnding/ -reserved 85' ,,/ l,._ a in Ie Family Lots: 90 Lots 85'Sngle Family Lots: 84 Lots (Incl udes 7 f uture lots by ot hers) lu"Ild SDi I Borrow/�. / *(Includes7fut ire lots by others) Aspen Grove G A Rood Storage 49 Overall . Gross Density: 1.6 un/ac Overall Gross Density: 1.6 un/ac JL I I 0� r— - - - 319 units/ 197 5 ac 394 units/ 197 C; nr I '"W F71 j .Overall Net Density: 2.2 un/ac Overall Net Density: 2.2 un/ac 319units/ 146.2 ac 324 units/ 146.2 ac I I I UK' - --r - - - - - - - F *. _ -_ - /-f Set b acks: Set b acks: 4 _, \ ` \ :,:' 50' Single Family Lots: 50' Single Family Lots: SdeSetbacks: 7.577.5'(15'Total) 9de Setbacks: 5'/5'(10'Total a�1aAerial photography from State of Minnesota; j Aerial photography from State of Minnesota; 114, ! �� / _ _ _ ;', Topography from State LIDAR Topography from State LIDAR 1 7, Lj Existing 47;2 Wetland A& i . �V OUTLOTJ�7- •J ICA, W4 V ------------------- ----------- --------------- ------- ---------------------------- w. 7 L r� N ' 7rr rc lf _ • • ^� `\\ � / > / \>/, <\max ., / \ \ i I \ \\ 'II i,�\� <\� \ �� ) /�\ j \ �- _ �_ _ _ / I __� �---� � � I F � I r \\ \ \\ / r r/ � r \ ti.. �\�\ \ \ iI r ii\ \ � < ,' � I>^ � , — , � / _--11-- 1f if � r r� II I � �� El I • J Westwood EXCELSIOR Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive -.0- The Excelsior Group Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MIN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com 02-21-2019 0008463 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. JTJ g, 0 *47 'WE 9 Rm NAM an.. N-16 woo- Sm F-2 M I l y\ �� ,� �® �,,�` � � 1, � � � �� i =___-_=-- _=- ��� ( � �' � i� �,''�� // d. l( 'Oy g1 ,. I �». ■ . \!I•Si, � +4''-,�9a,9 �,_a0a.aY-------- --- �� 1 ■ ,: I� ( ` // .,��' III ■+_ Q �� �or3u�.�— ...�_------- IIe•a '' : k, ju, ILI ap IM n I mss.61 %WagwA win UTLOT E IMR,•� � • ■ ��� ��, � y Existing L Fbnd '17 e Buffer Wetland Julch St N Proposed Easement Preserved R n e G a e- .......... P,gundabout Entry Monument # W- �y © 2019 Westwood Profes � I I I II I i I I � a°�a���0�� c'` � ill ' • E xr, Em 01 •s�,4♦aoo ♦♦1.��♦♦�♦♦ ♦.� � �♦��♦�♦jam. • � `°�♦♦e �e , ,` � �Od ser �i� �� ' • _�weoe .\Di�� �s°4v .�� � .;���� �i�.-� wo 941.5 . b .0 I 4.� CD I Ln Iry I i _t C CD 00 W Ond „8 1 1.12% NVS - - �1 VM FLAY A VE)VUE N. 9315 Ln c� C) � I rn l� �_ CD lid • --tnr.L r1) M r7 I it �� rn I � co I r� LO 7 A m rn Lq c� 1 3I9 DENOTES SOIL BORING 4 933.5 CD - - 933.5 936.6 I u7 o Cd -980 Lq rn rn �_ CD lid • --tnr.L r1) M r7 I it �� rn I � co I r� LO 7 A m rn Lq c� 1 3I9 p\� 00 �0I `TEMPORARY DEWATERING CHANNEL PRIOR TO STORM SEWER AS NECESSARY DENOTES SOIL BORING 4 933.5 CD - - 933.5 936.6 �HDSF� Cd -980 Lq rn rn 00 li o � co 933.6(]93:3:.:5:)[J' 933.5 rn = 933.5 LGR LO 1 WO Wp '9 WO 941.7 G 941.611 G 941.5 G 941.5 G 941.5. 41'5 DENOTES EROSION CONTROL ROCK CHECKS E.O.F. DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW rn I I I I I ,t DENOTES INLET PROTECTION : - .'.'.'.'.'...'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' DENOTES WOOD FIBER EROSION r7 CONTROL BLANKET o I DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT I rn 8.4 DENOTES EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN DENOTES WETLAND FILL - - DENOTES WETLAND - - DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER DND DENOTES DO NOT DISTURB 00 POND ACCESS ROUTE EROSION CONTROL o • ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE /rn TURF OR GROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE p\� 00 �0I `TEMPORARY DEWATERING CHANNEL PRIOR TO STORM SEWER AS NECESSARY no 0 0 0 0 N ~ =6)CVd � II C X W I a W � - C �� DENOTES SOIL BORING 4 933.5 - - - - - 933.5 936.6 �HDSF� Cd -980 i`0 ..-980- - rn DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER o � co 933.6(]93:3:.:5:)[J' 933.5 0) 933.5 LGR LO WO no 0 0 0 0 N ~ =6)CVd � II C X W I a W � - C �� DENOTES SOIL BORING 4 933.5 - - - - - 933.5 936.6 �HDSF� DENOTES HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE -980 933.5 ..-980- - DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER �►►� DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER 93 �7 933.6(]93:3:.:5:)[J' 933.5 33.5 933.5 LGR LO WO WO Wp '9 WO 941.7 G 941.611 G 941.5 G 941.5 G 941.5. 41'5 DENOTES EROSION CONTROL ROCK CHECKS E.O.F. DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW I I I I I I ,t DENOTES INLET PROTECTION : - .'.'.'.'.'...'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' DENOTES WOOD FIBER EROSION r7 CONTROL BLANKET ............... WETLAND KES 2 I `92\ FILL=0.07 AC. 92 POND ja a►��ii9s �1�-- '•D 'BOTTOM -9-18-.5 as M - TWO ROWS OF BMP'S NEEDS TO BE IMPACTED. PROTECT WETLAND IN THE / - = �- INTERIM PERIOD 933.5 r M WETLAN KE` 5 TEMPORARY A :ER NG - CHANNEL PMOR TO STORM V 1 1 �\ SEWER .A � NECESS RY_ I A \ \ \ 3.5 ° l \ 910- 9, �►/ \ TWO ROWS OF BMP'S i G Wp o `o NEEDED WHERE DISTURBED 94.5 G // I ry ) I .'� SOILS ARE WITHIN 50FT OF -900- ►,. OMT � o �\ / % s 3 / M I NWL OF r LAND MA= ONE - / / GRADWO (TttP) FLETCHE LANE N. \� 0.62% 5 4 0.60%3 -1 ` �� J 0) 2 100, °' 70i 9 / ' � -rn - F 941.7 G G 941.7 G 941.6 G 941.5 G 941.5 I R R R R R w M `� `� co TEMPOR DEWATE DO CHANNE F RIOR TO M Q0 39'6 I 0)LN�� / M �� / I o 940 \ °' o / / \ / rnodad ac o . 38. I \39.4 ^M� M \ li CO Ld rn °� \ n rn \ O O940- - N 0o � ; rn cV \ Cf) 933.5 933.5 933.5 933.5 Ft `o 4�0 \ NJ R9�k15 / ::::.:•: I � R R R G sg \ J opo a, 941.5 G 941.5 G 941.5 G 941.5 G 8•9Lq m 17 0.60% 16 o �I \ i : DND \ \ \ v 15 ^ \ i 0) MCF 2 .8 \ oGi�; W� , r7 s '0000 941.5 G 941.5 G 941.5 G 941.5 G G 941.5 1 CM� R R R R LO G 941.5 0)�2'p \ \- �.. \ LO 942.1 G � 933.5 933.5 933.5 933.5 I I 933.5 933.5 WO(1) 934.1 \ WETLAND KES - 2:00, .- M Ld V V M 936.5 9� I- �. 936.5 W 934.8 �... M X X Q Li O L L ^ \ l J o 10 DND I�in rn Iii rn SILT FENCE TYP Westwood I hereby certify that this plan was prepared me or under AL Revisions direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL fid; Jgg ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 11/07/18 Revised Pond 12 04/22/19 Revised per Plat Checked: J1HB Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 09/09/19 Revised Rear Swales Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 11/04/19 Revised NW Villas Grading Drawn: DJW Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com john Bender Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 11/04/19 License Na 43358 Drawing ��� Prepared for: 0F5 Adelaide LLC 1660 Highway 100 South, Suite 400 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com Common Ground Alliance LEGEND: Adelaide Landing 4th Add. Phase 2 grading ADELAIDE - L A N D I N G - Hugo, MN I = !!I 0' 50' 100' 150' Latest Revision Date:11/04/19 0008463GDF02.dwg Date: 10/02/18 sheet: 6 of 9 Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Plan DENOTES SOIL BORING �SF� DENOTES SILT FENCE PW SF DENOTES POST GRADING SILT FENCE �HDSF� DENOTES HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE -980 DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS ..-980- - DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER �►►� DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING TREE LINE DENOTES APPROXIMATE TREE REMOVAL LIMITS x 856.3 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION 66.30 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 66.30 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION /TEMP X0001:10b FOR TEMPORARY DITCH DENOTES EROSION CONTROL ROCK CHECKS E.O.F. DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW TW=1020 DENOTES TOP WALL ELEVATION BW=1000 DENOTES BOTTOM WALL ELEVATION DENOTES RETAINING WALL DENOTES INLET PROTECTION AT CATCH BASINS .'.'.'.'.'...'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' DENOTES WOOD FIBER EROSION :•:•:•:•:•:•:.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•: CONTROL BLANKET ............... (3:1 AND STEEPER SLOPES) DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT DENOTES EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED DENOTES EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN DENOTES WETLAND FILL - - DENOTES WETLAND - - DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER DND DENOTES DO NOT DISTURB POND ACCESS ROUTE EROSION CONTROL NOTES: • ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON-SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAY BALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. • ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO THE DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. • SEED & MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS, EXCLUDING ROAD BEDS & PONDS BELOW OUTLET ELEV. GENERAL GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES: • ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTER GRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD-VERFIY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLAN. • ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES. • POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES. Adelaide Landing 4th Add. Phase 2 grading ADELAIDE - L A N D I N G - Hugo, MN I = !!I 0' 50' 100' 150' Latest Revision Date:11/04/19 0008463GDF02.dwg Date: 10/02/18 sheet: 6 of 9 Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Plan ■ ROPOSED WON Po IND • 1 i '.KW'— Minimum Lot" RIP ;:,•- W-Ront SEA back I 01- f / e .2d Typical Lot Area Ront SBt back (F Y04 �• * " r - 5 Ll vk�_. ' Pond I/ "o -- ■ } J IF dr dr F r •�y t r r • - _ •.1 _ Ii •il ` t }� {„ :.` .,`}• _ I A11111kh W.", jr P.lro Lf �{ jeF Pr oo�'o Fbnd ...... .... P ---�rg :I.- A.F 'moi, ^'ayt FolL 002Oltit IjjJFlop I".:. 'Lrie hl rr 50'Si f k ■■ +r Family - .......1... =-y ATOI*TOI• AW 6, JrUUTLO I y. f 6 ! L NF # C.A d e I a d H u gco Trail' k_ i01me 0 FW L= .t lee Fow~ ;� C2019 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. g36 936 I 936T7 ------ I --Ti 0 � � 94 1 NPO '3 - ---- i — HH� -----J 777 0 9 ► ►►/ITI _36 936 PNOP 4 CCF VB 2 926 924 1 1 REL 1 940 1 SGM 3 NOS 1 NPO 936 1 4 NOS 1 AGG 1 ABM 4 CCF 2 WH 1 922 920 1 1 918 �C / \ - 1 t1 REL °' 1 I I I I 4 I I 5 6 1 2 3 6 BHS6 swo 0 1 I I/ \ / / I \ I I I I I I I i �� / � �-�-, � L 8 SKH I \ 1 I— / O OT A L / Ly�-j 10, CO / �� MON�ME3D�ETA 10.1 S►►► ., i , 7 9�IF 1 1 3 QUA -- - _-_ -1 F-— — - - _ ►►► \ ``` / / // I ��� 3 NOS 1 1 IF 13 2 SWO �, 1 19 ABM I 4 I `� �^, ` 2 c I I ol 936 — — F — — pi 934 —1 7 A 4 BHS 1 2 1 2 I I 't 12 I \ 1 I I 9 L — — _ L 5 WHP A —No1 -1 7 - r - - u 33 - g I / tK F, I I I 11 I 10 �� LL �-I�0 -� 938 _ - - - J / 940 _ 1 4 4 I I m I °'`L�� ' 942 944 \ 1 I I 10 I 11 I 0) e J— L- - � - J -I - J .NATIVE 6 4 BHS - - / SEED�MIX 8 / F- -F (33-f261)T 5 �\ / I 4 5 NOS 2 1 1 9 1 I /12 - 5 SKH � J d- 9- - \ _ ►o \� �� 940 �� \J - . 0 5 -7 I 13 41 6 - I 7 N / ' I � � — 4WHP 14 4 i I � � / I I � . ► � / 1015 \ .• ,\ _ '� �-� TION 932 \ 8 / / ^ 14 AGG 1 / MlT �`n9 XX 1A IQ \ FUTURE 12 940 12 / l L.NDS APl J l / 938 / / 13 (P� •930, � � � � � � / / � � ► �— �—1 / 1✓ \ r / 936 X14 ,, a / 1 \► o \ "'00o'IJ 4L , , J / / / I / 1 / /12 REO C?\ \ o 13 v/ J 934 16 / _�, � / l / \ / 32 r NATIVE WET 30 � � / /WHP SEED MIX � � J \ V- \ � (33-261) L � , i J L 40 / o 0' 50' 100' 150' / U Call 48 Hours before digging: 5TH / 1 / OW INTENANCE / \ t I 811 of cal1811.com 1I ti ADDITION - 14 % ^ - ' � 1 1 � RF OFF TRAIL Common Ground Alliance LIMIT , 1 8' BITUMINOUS \ \ _ Date: 12/12/19 Sheet: 2 of 5 0008463.05PLF01.d, Westwood I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under AL Revisions- � Prepared for: Final Landscape direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL rj'1'M • LANDSCAPE AR under the laws of the State of Minnesota.0F5 Adelaide LLC ADELAIDE Plan - 5th Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Drawn: SAR Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Cory Meyer 1660 Highway 100 South, Addition Remora �� ��� Suite 400 LANDING Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 12/12/ �cenee Na 26971 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Hugo, MN c2019 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Planting Notes 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. FIELD SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND/OR CITY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ONE YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6. AT TIME OF PLANTING ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA -GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, OPEN WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5:3. 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL -IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10. AT CONTRACTOR DISCRETION, TWINE AND TOP OF BURLAP MAY BE LEFT ON FOR INITIAL YEAR AFTER INSTALLATION ONLY IF BIODEGRADABLE TWINE AND BURLAP ARE USED. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY TWINE AND BURLAP DEGRADATION AFTER ONE YEAR PERIOD AND REMOVE ANY REMNANT MATERIAL AS NECESSARY. 11. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 12. REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 13. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 14. STAKING OF TREES IS OPTIONAL AT CONTRACTOR DISCRETION; REPOSITION AND PLUMB IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. NON -PLUMB TREES TO BE SUBJECT TO WARRANTY REPLACEMENT OR REPAIR. 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE NATIVE TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY -VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V -SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN -GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED EXCEPT POND AREAS AND WETLAND BUFFERS (SEE GRADING PLAN / EROSION CONTROL). SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS -BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. LAWN SPRINKLERS/IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL ALL HAVE RAIN SENSORS TO LIMIT UNNECESSARY WATERING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. Westwood Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCFU= under the laws of the State of Minnesota Cory Meyer Date 12/12 Licenee No. 26971 Planting Details DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. TREE WRAP MATERIAL FROM GROUNDLINE UPWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES, AS REQUIRED. PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER PLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. N.T.S. LAST REVISED: EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING SHRUB PLANTING LA28 PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING AS REQUIRED, FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER PLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. N.T.S. LAST REVISED: LA29 REMOVE CONTAINER, SET SOIL MASS ON COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING SHRUBS NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED GRADE. ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 4" OF SPECIFIED MULCH AND WEED BARRIER FABRIC. EDGE ALL PLANTING BEDS WITH SPECIFIED EDGER WHERE ADJACENT TO LAWN AREAS. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. N.T.S. LAST REVISED: LA27 Secondary Entry Monument Planting Plan SCALE 1" = 10'-0" Final Plant Schedule - Entry Monument QTY. CODE COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME SIZE SPACING O.C. 10 ABH Incrediball Hydrangea / Hydrangea aborescens 'Abetwo' #5 CONT. 4'-0" O.C. 5 LDN Little Devil Ninebark / Physocarpus opulifolius 'Donna May' #5 CONT. 3'-0" O.C. 11 MIS Miscanthus Flame Grass / Miscanthus sinensis 'Purpurascens' #3 CONT. 36" O.C. 22 LRS Little Spire Russian Sage / Perovskia 'Little Spire' #1 CONT. 18" O.C. 19 BES Black -Eyed Susans / Rudbeckia fulgida var. sullivantii 'Goldstrum' #1 CONT. 18" O.C. 19 PDS Prairie Dropseed / Sporobolus heterolepis #1 CONT. 24" O.C. 26 RSD Ruby Stella Daylily / Hemerocallis 'Ruby Stella' #1 CONT. 18" O.C. Entry Monument Concept Elevation NOTE: ARTIST CONCEPT; SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITH SIGNAGE PERMIT APPLICATION. Designed: NTM checkech CLM Drawn: SAR Record Drawing by/date Prepared for: 0R5 Adelaide LLC 1660 Highway 100 South, Suite 400 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Stormwater Native Seed Mix 33-261 33-261 Stormwater South & West Common Name Scientific Name Rate (kg/ha) Rate (Ib/ac) % of Mix (% by wt) Seeds/ sq ft big bluestem Andro 0 on gerardii 2.24 2.00 5.72% 7.35 fringed brome Bromus ciliatus 2.24 2.00 5.73% 8.10 bluejoint Calama rostis canadensis 0.07 0.06 0.18% 6.40 slender wheatgrass El mus trach caulus 1.12 1.00 2.85% 2.53 Virginia wild rye El mus vir inicus 1.68 1.50 4.28% 2.31 switchgrass Panicum vir atum 0.43 0.38 1.07% 1.93 fowl bluegrass Poa palustris 1.19 1.06 3.03% 50.70 Indian grass Sor hastrum nutans 0.13 0.12 0.36% 0.55 prairie cordgrass S artina pectinata 0.43 0.38 1.07% 0.91 Total Grasses 9.53 8.50 24.29% 80.78 awl -fruited sedge Carex sti ata 0.28 0.25 0.71% 3.10 dark green bulrush Scir us atrovirens 0.21 0.19 0.54% 31.70 woolgrass Scir us cyperinus 0.07 0.06 0.18% 39.00 Total Sedges and Rushes 0.56 0.50 1.43% 73.80 Canada anemone Anemone canadensis 0.08 0.07 0.19% 0.20 marsh milkweed Asclepias incarnata 0.12 0.11 0.32% 0.20 leafy beggarticks Bidens frondosa 0.12 0.11 0.31% 0.20 flat-topped aster Doellin eria umbellate 0.07 0.06 0.17% 1.50 spotted Joe pye weed Eutrochium maculatum 0.07 0.06 0.18% 2.19 autumn sneezeweed Helenium autumnale 0.15 0.13 0.36% 5.97 obedient plant Ph soste is vir iniana 0.08 0.07 0.21% 0.30 tall coneflower Rudbeckia laciniata 0.08 0.07 0.21% 0.37 New England aster S m h otrichum novae -an liae 0.08 0.07 0.19% 1.56 blue vervain Verbena hastata 0.06 0.05 0.15% 1.85 olden alexanders Zizia aurea 0.22 0.20 0.56% 0.79 Total Forbs, 1.12 1.00 2.85% 15.13 Oats or winter wheat (see note at beginning of list for recommended dates) 28.02 25.00 71.43% 11.14 Total Cover Crop 28.02 25.00 71.43% 11.14 Totals: 39.23 35.00 100.00% 180.85 Purpose: Stormwater pond edges, temporarily flooded flooded ditch bottoms. dry ponds, and temporarily Planting Area: Tallgrass Aspen Parklands, Prairie Parkland, and Eastern Broadleaf Forest Provinces. Mn/DOT Districts 2(west), 313, 4, Metro, 6, 7 & 8. Low Maintenance Turf Seed Mix 25431 25-131 Low Maintenance Turf Common Name Scientific Name Rate (Ib/ac) Rate (kg/ha) % of Mix (by weight) Seeds/ sq ft red fescue Festuca rubra 64.00 71.73 29.09% 667.00 Chewin 's Fescue Festuca rubra ssp. commutata 44.00 49.32 20.00% 458.60 Low Maintenance Kentucky bluegrass Poa pratensis Low Maintenance 36.00 40.35 16.361/6 1148.70 Hard fescue Festuca trachyphylla 30.00 33.63 13.640/6 389.10 Sheep Fescue Festuca ovina 25.00 28.02 11.37% 304.22 Perennial R e rass Lolium perenne 21.00 23.54 9.54% 104.60 Total 220.00 246.59 100.00% 3072.22 Purpose: Salt, shade and drought tolerant turfgrass. Requires less fertilization than conventional turfgrass. frequent mowing and less Planting Area: Statewide Combine all components when blending this mix. ADELAIDE LA N D I N G Hueo, MN Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com Common Ground Alliance Date. 12/12/19 Sheet: 5 OF 5 0008463.05PLF01. dw Landscape Notes & Details i /�\ �` �—: — :�. ���� - 'T 4 �_ � �, �,�� , -•+� ..- _. t r. ��';� ,� �` �—: — :�. ���� - 'T 4 �_ - \/ Nip ,11 m did a`dod d - .. ar Examples with a 4 foot side yard setback n E13 - EL AL i S Agenda Number: D.5 CITY OF HUGO PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Hugo Planning Commission FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Fenway Land Company —Preliminary Plat and PUD General Plan for a residential development to be known as "Rice Lake Reserve" DATE: December 12, 2019, for the Planning Commission meeting of December 19, 2019 ZONING: Future Urban Service (FUS) LAND USE: Low Density Residential (LD) DEADLINE DATE: 60 -Days —January 14, 2019 1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a residential development. The property totals 51.5 acres and is comprised of four parcels. The preliminary plat includes 93 single family residential lots and 3 outlots to be known as "Rice Lake Reserve". The PUD General Plan will be for all 51.5 acres of the property and is proposed to be rezoned from Future Urban Service (FUS) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). The property includes wetlands and floodplain for a total buildable acreage of 29.5 acres. The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility on the following: Flexibility to allow a minimum lot size of 7,089 square feet, where 10,400 square feet is required. Flexibility to allow a minimum lot width of 55 feet, were 80 feet is required by ordinance. Page 2 Flexibility to allow a minimum front setback of 20 feet for corner lots for the side of the home, where 30 feet is required. Flexibility to allow a minimum side yard setback of 7.5 feet, where 10 feet is required. Flexibility to allow a maximum impervious coverage of a lot to be 55%, where 50% is required. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer is: • Designing a more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of the standard R-3 zoning district. • Preserving and enhancing natural features with the trail system that meanders through the development. • Creating a stormwater reuse irrigation project within the development. • Incorporating architectural design guidelines for the homes in the development 2. BACKGROUND: The properties are generally located north of Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8) and east of Goodview Avenue. The plan shows 93 proposed residential lots, stormwater ponding areas, sidewalk and trail connections, and road connections. The applicant is proposing the project to be built in three phases. The developer has indicated that an HOA will be established for the development to maintain community areas, landscaping, and the water re -use system. 3. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding land Use and Zoning The property to the north is zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and occupied by the Diamond Point East residential development. The properties to the east and south are zoned Future Urban Service (FUS) and occupied by large residential lots. The properties to the west, across Goodview Avenue, are zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Single Family Detached Residential (R-3) and are occupied by the Diamond Point West residential development, large residential lots, and a few vacant parcels. B. Natural Characteristics of Site The properties are currently vacant and does contain some challenges regarding an existing floodplain and wetlands. The properties are rolling with various elevations with approximately 21 acres of wetlands. Page 3 4. ANALYSIS: A. Level of Discretion in Decision Making The City has discretion in approving or denying rezoning applications, based on whether or not the proposal meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable standards are met, the rezoning application must be approved. However, if the City finds that any of the applicable standards are not met, the application may be denied. The City has relatively high level of discretion in approving a PUD. A PUD must be consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Rezoning/Planned Unit Development The use of the PUD zoning allows the developer zoning ordinance flexibility to create a master planned development. The PUD zoning is tied to a specific PUD general plan that is proposed with this application. Fenway Land Company, is requesting an approval of a PUD for the Rice Lake Reserve development. PUD's offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of zoning district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater variety of uses, internal transfers of density, construction phasing and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the city has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of other, more standard zoning districts. In order to approve a PUD, the City must find that the applicant has demonstrated compliance with the following criteria: 1. Provide for the establishment of PUD zoning districts in appropriate setting and situations, to create and maintain a development pattern that complies with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. Allow for the mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land uses could not otherwise be accomplished. Page 4 3. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. 4. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability and general welfare of the City. 5. Preserve and enhance natural features and open spaces including but not limited to the width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas, development of buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint facilities and utilities. 6. Maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities. 7. Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. In exchange for the proposed PUD, the applicant is proposing a more sensitive development proposal than would have been the case with the use of the standard R-3 zoning district, preservation of natural features with the trail system that meanders through the development, installation of a stormwater reuse irrigation project within the development, and incorporating architectural design guidelines for the homes in the development. Many of the homes are also positioned for scenic overlooks over the stormwater ponds and wetlands. Staff has made a few recommendations within the staff report that shall be incorporated into the development, for PUD flexibility. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan shows the land use being Low Density Residential (LD). The rezoning/PUD is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in terms of land use and density. Staff believes that the general layout of the proposed Rice Lake Reserve PUD general plan will exceed the City's standards for residential developments, if the recommendations are incorporated into the development. The stormwater ponds also offer an ability to use stormwater for irrigation of the development, which is promoting the City's "Reduce, Reuse, Replenish" initiative. This will be further discussed later in the report. It is in staff's opinion that the Rice Lake Reserve PUD general plan, with the staff recommendations incorporated, will offer a creative and efficient method to planning the site, all which meets the intent of the PUD ordinance. The applicant has included a "ghost plat" or an example of how the other properties adjacent to the development could planned/developed in the future. The lots and the layout of the lots are not approved with this development. Staff has not evaluated this area for consistency with the comprehensive plan or City Code. Page 5 Lot Sizes/Setbacks The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 51.5 -acres to create 93 residential home sites. The applicant is proposing a combination of product types and lot sizes listed below: * Requested PUD flexibility highlighted in grey The applicant is requesting flexibility in setbacks for the development. The applicant is proposing the following setbacks: R-3 Zoning55' District Wide Lots Lot Size (min) 10,400 SF 7,089 SF Lot Size (av) District 8,464 SF 1 Lot Width (min) 80 Ft 55 Ft Lot Depth (min) 100 Ft 125 Ft * Requested PUD flexibility highlighted in grey The applicant is requesting flexibility in setbacks for the development. The applicant is proposing the following setbacks: * Requested PUD flexibility highlighted in grey The applicant shall revise the lot depth for Lot 1, Block 1, to be in compliance with the rear yard setback of 30 feet. Density The maximum development density for a PUD in the R-3 zoning district is 4 units per 1 acre. The applicant is proposing a residential net density of 3.1 units per 1 acre, which fits the requirements of a PUD. Although the applicant is requesting flexibility on lot sizes and setbacks, the density meets the ordinance standards. R-3 55' Wide Zoning Lots District Front Setback 30 Ft 30 Ft (min) 25 Ft - side of home on a corner lot and lots 18,19, and 2, Block 4 20 Ft — for existing home on Lot 1, Block 1 Side Setback 10 Ft 7.5 Ft min Rear Setback 30 Ft 30 Ft min Lot Impervious 50%55% max * Requested PUD flexibility highlighted in grey The applicant shall revise the lot depth for Lot 1, Block 1, to be in compliance with the rear yard setback of 30 feet. Density The maximum development density for a PUD in the R-3 zoning district is 4 units per 1 acre. The applicant is proposing a residential net density of 3.1 units per 1 acre, which fits the requirements of a PUD. Although the applicant is requesting flexibility on lot sizes and setbacks, the density meets the ordinance standards. Page 6 Shoreland The applicant, Staff, and the DNR have been discussing the boundary of the Ordinary High Water (OHW) of Rice Lake which is 922.5. The information that has been provided indicates that this property is not within the Shoreland Overlay District. The Shoreland Overlay District has additional regulations in regards to lot size and impervious surface. Staff will continue to work with the applicant and the DNR on the boundary location. If it is determined that the property is within the Shoreland Overlay District, the request and the plans may change. Development Phasing The applicant is proposing to construct the development in three phases. The phasing plan the applicant provided shows the phasing generally starting from the north along Goodview Avenue and heading east. The first phase would be in 2020 and include the platting of 33 lots with access off of Goodview Avenue. As development continues eastward on the site in later phases of the development, a connection will be made to Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). The property is also proposed to be graded in two phases. The applicant shall revised the phasing plan to include all improvements, such as stormwater ponds. Landscaping/ Signage The applicant has provided a full landscape plan. According to Section 90-181 Landscaping, each home site shall have two deciduous shade trees maintained in the front yard. The applicant is proposing to preserve some stands of trees that are currently on the property in the outlots. The landscape plan shows boulevard trees along the streets outside of the right-of-way. The applicant is also proposing to have one tree in the front yard of all lots. The trees and landscaping proposed to be installed with the development is approximately 208 trees. Staff recommends the applicant include additional coniferous (evergreen) trees along the south side of Lot 20, Block 4, to provide a buffer from Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). The plan also shows a landscaped entrance from Goodview Avenue North including a monument sign. Staff recommends additional landscaping at the entrance off of Goodview Avenue creating a defined main entrance into the development. There is enough space on the plan to include additional landscaping. The applicant is proposing a monument sign, but the design of the sign is not proposed at this time. The monument sign location, design, and landscaping, shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to installation. The monument sign shall meet all ordinance standards. It's in staff's opinion that the applicant has done generally a good job with the landscape plan and the preservation of the trees. Staff recommends: • The applicant shall include additional coniferous (evergreen) trees along the south side of Lot 20, Block 4, to provide a buffer from Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). • The applicant shall include additional landscaping at the entrance off of Goodview Avenue creating a defined main entrance into the development. Page 7 • The applicant shall include additional landscaping around a portion of the lift station. • The monument sign location, design, and landscaping, shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to installation. With the recommendations, Staff is comfortable with the landscaping proposed for the development. Lighting The applicant has provided a lighting plan. The applicant is proposing typical street lighting within the development that meets the ordinance standard. The exact locations and design of the street lights will be evaluated with each final plat application. Staff recommends the street lights be decorative. Streets/Access The applicant is proposing access into the development via Goodview Avenue North and Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). The first phase includes access to Goodview Avenue North across from Geneva Avenue North. The last phase includes the access to Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). The applicant shall provide Washington County approved construction plans and permit for the construction of turn lanes as identified in their November 7, 2019 review letter prior to construction of phase 1. There are existing roadway easements through the property as well as prescriptive easements for the Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8) access point. The portion of the easement will be required to be vacated as project proceeds. Sidewalks, Trails, and Park Dedication The applicant is showing sidewalks along one side of some streets within the development with a trail along the others. In the 2040 Comprehensive Plan the Existing and Proposed Trails Map shows a trail in the area of the development connecting Goodview Avenue North to Hanifl Fields Athletic Park. The plan shows a trail systems that could connect to a proposed trail along Goodview Avenue and Hanifl Fields Athletic Park per the plan. In order for the trail to be extended to Hanifl Fields Athletic Park the applicant shall revised the plans to show and install a trail along Street A. The trail system will provide a recreational experience that takes advantage of the view sheds of the natural areas and access to future trails and parks. The applicant has done a good job meeting the comprehensive plan in regards to trails. In previous discussions with the applicant staff recommended a neighborhood gathering space with some amenities be integrated into the development. The goal is to provide open space for the residents to use, gather, and meet. This directly correlates with the request to have PUD flexibility for reduced lot sizes and setbacks. Reduced lots sizes and setbacks results in less green space/open space for each lot the development. In a previous draft of the preliminary plat and PUD general plan the applicant showed a neighborhood gathering space, where Lots 1-3, Block Page 8 3, are shown in the preliminary plat. These lots were added after the Parks Commission meeting. The previous plan (90 units) was considered by the Parks Commission in November. At its Wednesday, November 20, 2019, meeting the Parks Commission considered the park dedication request from the applicant. The applicant requested to get park dedication credit for the .5 acre park/gather space area and to satisfy the remainder of the park dedication requirement with fees. Park land dedication of 3 acres would be required with for the 29.56 acre of upland within the development. Therefore, the proposed dedication of .5 acres would satisfy 16% of the requirement and the remaining 84% would be satisfied through fees. Currently, the park dedication fee is $2,400 per unit and would therefore be $2,016 per unit or $181,440 in total. Without a land dedication, the total park dedication fee would be $216,000. Staff noted at the meeting that the Parks, Trails, and Open Space plan outlines standards for developing city parks. Neighborhood parks shall be 5- 20 acres in size and would typically include a playground, athletic field, natural area, and picnic shelter. The development is in Neighborhood Park Service Area 9 (NP -9) which includes Diamond Point Park. An additional park is not needed in NP -9 as it currently has a total population of 1,222 and the development will not lead to exceeding the standard of 1 park per 5,000 people. Additionally, the development is within 1/2 mile service area of Hanifl Fields Athletic Park. Staff recommended that the Parks Commission support construction of the trail through the development. The applicant at that time was proposing that the .5 acre neighborhood gathering space be considered for park dedication. Staff recommended that this not be dedicated as a public park and that the park dedication be satisfied by payment of the full fee, which is currently $2,400 per unit ($216,000 for 90 units). The Parks Commission liked the trail through the development and recommended sidewalks to be added to streets. The applicant has added sidewalks to the plans. Although the Parks Commission liked the neighborhood gathering space included in the plan, they recommended not accepting land for the park dedication and accepting the full park land dedication fee of $216,000 ($2,400/unit). After the Parks Commission meeting the applicant added 3 lots to the plans in the area where the neighborhood gathering space was proposed. Staff recommends that a neighborhood gather space with some amenities (such as landscaping, gazebo, etc.) be included in the central area of the development. The applicant has stated in their narrative that they are proposing a gathering space at the entrance off of Goodview Avenue North. The applicant is referring to Outlot B. Outlot B is small (.22 acres) and will include a monument sign and minimal landscaping. There are not amenities shown in the Outlot for a neighborhood gathering space. It is in staff's opinion that this is not a good location a neighborhood gathering space and recommends that the applicant revise the preliminary plat and PUD general plan to include a neighborhood gathering space in the general location of Lots 1-3, Block 3, as shown in the plan as previously proposed. Staff recommends that be a requirement for PUD flexibility for the reduced lots sizes and setbacks. Adding the neighborhood gathering space in the area would likely reduce the amount of wetland impact and reroute the trail slightly to the south. Staff recommends the applicant revise the plans Page 9 to show a neighborhood gather space central to the development and install a trail along Street A with the development. The Parks Commission stated at the right time, a trail along the north side of Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8) to the east of Street A, would evaluated for construction feasibility to make the connection to Hanifl Fields Athletic Park. Drainage/Grading The City will review and issue a stormwater management permit for the development. The plans include managing stormwater through a combination of ponds and a stormwater reuse system. The design is consistent with stormwater rules as proposed, and staff will work with the applicant to finalize the plans and issue a stormwater permit as the project moves forward. There is floodplain located on the property and the boundary is not proposed to be impacted or revised. Water Re -use The plans include the installation of a stormwater reuse system to be utilized to irrigate individual lots. The system is feasible from a water availability and equipment standpoint and staff will finalize the technical details as the project moves forward. The system will be installed by the applicant and owned/operated/maintained by the homeowner's association. The system will be part of the overall stormwater management improvements to be included as part of the stormwater permit. A stormwater reuse agreement between the City and the applicant shall be recorded. The agreement will include provisions that will allow the City to operate the system in the event that it is necessary to maintain compliance with the stormwater permit. The provisions will include an ability to assess any City costs associated with operation and maintenance of the system. Staff is working with the applicant to determine whether or not the water reuse system will generate stormwater management credits beyond those required to meet their own permitting requirements. If that is the case, the City will include in its use agreement with the developer that excess credits generated are the property of the City. Wetlands The property includes some wetlands, which have been delineated and approved by the City as LGU. The applicant is proposing to impact .54 acres of the 21 acres of wetland for street and pond construction. The applicant has submitted a wetland replacement plan to the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) for approval of the wetland impacts. The wetland replacement plan will need to be approved prior to final plat approval of any phase. The applicant needs to address several items from WCA Replacement Plan Checklist. Primarily the Technical Evaluation Panel will likely be concerned with the wetland impact from lot 1, block 3 and adjacent trail. Page 10 Homeowners Association A homeowners association (HOA) is proposed for the development. There are two housing styles (single family detached homes and Villa homes) that are proposed within the development. All of the homes would be part of a Master HOA established for the development to own/operate/maintain community areas, landscaping, and the water re -use system. The HOA would also establish an Architectural Review Committee (ARC) to review and approve the home designs per architectural design guidelines. The HOA documents and the architectural design guidelines shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the recording of the final plat for the first phase. Each property owners will be responsible for maintaining their own yards and property. Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat consists of 93 residential lots and 3 outlots. The proposed use and ownership of each outlot are as follows: Outlot Acres Ownership Use A 10.52 City of Hugo Wetlands B .22 Development Homeowners Association (HOA) Landscaping and Monument Sign C 16.77 City of Hugo Stormwater Management and Wetlands Utilities Water service is proposed to be extended from the Goodview Avenue/Geneva Avenue Intersection. Staff has recommended connecting to the existing 12" watermain and extend 12" watermain through the development to Egg Lake Road that meets the goal of the comprehensive water system plan. Sanitary sewer will be extended from the 4" forcemain provided to this location in 2004 as part of the Goodview Avenue Improvement Project as the site was deemed to require a sanitary sewer lift station to service this area. The lift station will be sized and placed at an elevation that will allow for the extension of gravity sanitary sewer to serve the adjacent area up to and including the Hugo Public Works facility. If lift station upsizing is required, the City of Hugo would be responsible for oversizing costs. Page 11 5. CONCLUSION: Staff recommends the following revisions and additions to the plans: • The applicant shall revise the lot depth for Lot 1, Block 1, to be in compliance with the rear yard setback of 30 feet. • The applicant shall include additional coniferous (evergreen) trees along the south side of Lot 20, Block 4, to provide a buffer from Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). • The applicant shall include additional landscaping at the entrance off of Goodview Avenue creating a defined main entrance into the development. • The applicant shall include additional landscaping around a portion of the lift station. • The monument sign location, design, and landscaping, shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to installation. • A trails shall be added to the plans for Street A. The trail shall be installed and paid for by the developer. • The applicant revise the plans to show a neighborhood gather space central to the development, including amenities. Staff believes that the layout of the proposed Rice Lake Reserve PUD general plan exceeds the City's standards for residential developments, if the staff recommendations are implemented. Fenway Land Company has offered a more creative and efficient approach to the existing constraints of the property through the site design layout. It is in staff's opinion that the applicant meets all the requirements necessary to approve the PUD and preliminary plat, subject to the conditions in the resolutions. 6. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the PUD and preliminary plat for Fenway Land Company for the development to be known as "Rice Lake Reserve", subject to the conditions listed in the resolutions. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location map 2. Ordinance approving the rezoning to PUD 3. Resolution approving the PUD General Plan 4. Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat 5. Engineer's Memo dated December 12, 2019 6. Washington County letter dated November 7, 2019 7. Applicant's Narrative dated December 12, 2019 8. Proposed Home Elevations 9. Preliminary Plat plans dated October 22, 2019 (received December 4, 2019) A. Phasing Plan B. Shoreland Exhibit 0 0 (7 CITTY (DF^ EST. 1808 r Hugo Border Parcel Boundary N Rice Lake Reserve Location Map 0 700 Hugo, MN Feet 1 in = 700 feet r� j Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary N Rice Lake Reserve Location Map 0 700 Hugo, MN Feet 1 in = 700 feet ORDINANCE 2020 - AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO AMENDING CHAPTER 90 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED EAST OF GOODVIE AVENUE NORTH AND NORTH OF EGG LAKE ROAD (CSAH8) THE CITY OF HUGO ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Chapter 90 of the City Code of the City of Hugo, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Hugo Zoning Map to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with respect to the 51.5 -acre property legally described as follows: See Attached Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6th day of January, 2020 Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Ordinance 2020 - Page 2 PARCEL f 17ES4A/PMW (Per Schedule A of T re Cu itment Na. MN52607, with a awnmftmeat date of April 24th, 2019 of e71%)A.M.. prepared by Pa-lners Title Company as issuing agents Stewart Title Guaranty Cemp-, ) That part of the North HWf of the Hwthwest lhrorter of 5 -ti- 28, Township 31 North, Range 2l West, Washington County Minnesoto described os Wham Commencing of the Southeast comer of said North Half of the Northwesf Qua -ter; thence W terly, ofarq the South fine of sold North Hnlf of fhe Northwesf quarter, 1214.70 fee} thence Ala fherfy, p—h.f with the Eosf line of said North Haff of fhe Northwest Quorfer, 854.06 feet to the polnt of beglnrtln g; thence cantinaog Nmfherfy, parallel Wth said Fast line, 436 heat, more or less, to the North line of said Section 28; thence Weaterfy, along said North ffne, 1438 feet, mare or fess, to the West Ane of said Sealfon 28; thence Southerly, ofang said West fine. 438 feet, more or fess, to its lrit a r- with a Ane drawn WeateAy, parafle1 with the South fine of sold North Half of the Northwest Quarter, Ram the paint of beginning; thence 6aeteriy, along mid poralfrl fine, 14.35 feet, mare or fess, to the point of beginning, Washington County, Mm—fa. (Abstract Property) PARCEL 2 OEMUPAXi .. (Per Schedule A of Ube Commitment No. MN53001, with o commitment date of ApnT 30th, 2079 at 8:00 A.M., prepared by Partners rtle Company as issuing agents Stewart Title Guaranty Company ) That pmt of the North Half or the Na M-1 Q—ter of 5 -ti- 78, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County Minnesota, described ae follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of sold North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence westerly afang the South Ane of oatd North half of the Northwest Qaarter, 7214.10 feet; thence narthvfy, parapet with the East fine of said North Half of the Northwest Ouorter, 446.40 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing northerly, porotfef with sed East line, 437.66 feet; thence westerly p -.]JS with the South line of said North Hoff of the Northwest Quarter, 7435 feet, mare or fess, to the West line of said Section 28; thence southerly, of -g said West fine, 4J6 feet, more or less, to its fntersection with a tine drawn westerly, porallef with the South Ane of said North Naff of the Northwest Quarter (,— the point of beg+'n imq; thence easterly, clang sold paradel line, 1433 feel, mare or less, to the point of bNg .In9, (Abstract Property} PARCEL 3 DE50WR7CAY. (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. MN52809, with o Commitment dote of April 24th, 2079 at 8:00 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Company os issuing agents Stewart rtW Qruronty Company ) Phot part of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Sectfon 28, Township J7 N-th, flange 27 West, Washington County. Minnesota, described as Wffc— Commencing of the southeast tamer of the North Half of the Northwest Ou-ter of said Section 28; thence westerly, along the South line of sofd North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 1474.64 feet to the point of beginning; thence northerly, parallel with the East lino of —W North i WF of the Northwest 0—ter, 446.40 feet; thence westerly, parelel with the South Ane of said North Hdf of the Northwest Quarte,, 1772 (eat, more w less, to the West tine of sold Section 28; theme soulhedy, along said West line, 446,4 Feet, more or fess, to the southwest comer of said North Half of the Northwest CWarte, thence eastedy o0an9 the South frne of said North Half of the Northwest 0 --lar, t7G5 feet, more or less, to the paint of beginning. (Abstract Property) PARCEL 4 OESnWTAW. (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. MN53003, with o commitment dote of April 30th, 2019 at 8.00 A.M., prepared by Portners Title Company as issuing agents Stewart Title CUaranry Company ) That part of The North F004 of the Northwe91 fdrorter of Section 2$ fincluding Vacated rOGdwoy per V*Cument No- 534$$1, Tow»9hip 31 North, Rangy 21 West, Woshfn9tm County, Mfrine9o4o QeStribed a5 follow9- Commencing of the soufheosl comer of said North Half of Me Northwest Quarter, fh-- westerly, along the South fine of said Nath HOIf of the Norfhwest Q-6,, 427.60 feet to fhe point of beginning of fhe parcel to be desorlbed; thence northerly, parallel with the Fast Ifne of sold North Half of the Nwthwest quarter, 446.40 feet; thence westeriy, jo-1W with the South fine of said North Nolf of the Northwest Quarter, 1047.04 feet; thence—fherly, parallel with the East line of said North Half of the Northwest quarter, 446.40 feet to the South line of sofd North Half of the Northwest Quarter; thence easterfy along said south Ifne, 1047.04 feet to the point of begfnnfng. Washington County, Mfnnesoto. (Abstrnnt Propert),) RESOLUTION 2020 - APPROVING PUD GENERAL PLAN FOR FENWAY LAND COMPANY FOR "RICE LAKE RESERVE" ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF GOODVIEW AVENUE NORTH AND NORTH OF EGG LAKE ROAD (CSAH 8) WHEREAS, Fenway Land Company, has requested approval of a PUD general plan to allow approximately 93 single family residential lots and 3 outlots on the 51.5 acre property legally described as follows: (See Attached) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the PUD general plan at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Fenway Land Company, subject to the following conditions: 1. A PUD general plan is approved to allow the creation of approximately 93 single family residential lots and 3 outlots. The development shall be constructed in accordance with the application and plans received by the City on October 23, 2019, November 15, 2019, and December 4, 2019, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the requested rezoning of the 51.5 acre property and preliminary plat. 3. The PUD general plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 4. The developer shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer's letter dated December 12, 2019 and all red -lined comments provided to the applicant. 5. PUD flexibility is granted to allow: a. Flexibility to allow a minimum lot size of 7,089 square feet, where 10,400 square feet is required. b. Flexibility to allow a minimum lot width of 55 feet, were 80 feet is required by ordinance. c. Flexibility to allow a minimum front setback of 20 feet for corner lots for the side of the home, where 30 feet is required. d. Flexibility to allow a minimum side yard setback of 7.5 feet, where 10 feet is required. e. Flexibility to allow a maximum impervious coverage of a lot to be 55%, where 50% is required. Resolution 2020 - Page 2 6. The preliminary phasing plan is generally approved per plans dated October 22, 2019. The phasing plan shall be revised to include all improvements, such as stormwater management and trails. Any major revisions to the phasing plan shall require PUD amendment. Minor modifications shall be reviewed and approved by staff. a. Phase 1 shall include: i. Access to Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8) shall be reviewed and approved by Washington County. A permit for the connection shall be issued. ii. A neighborhood gathering space central to the overall development, including amenities. iii. Street C shall be constructed to the connection of Street B. b. Phase 2 shall include: N/A c. Phase 3 shall include: i. The connection to Egg lake Road (CSAH 8) shall be constructed. 7. The building setbacks and impervious surface coverage requirements for the PUD are as follows: 8. A stormwater re -use system, as shown in the plans, shall be constructed with the development. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by staff. The system will be installed by the applicant, and owned/operated/maintained by the homeowner's association. A stormwater reuse agreement shall be reviewed an approved by staff and recoded at Washington County. R-3 55' Wide Zoning Lots District Front Setback 30 Ft 30 Ft (min) 25 Ft - side of home on a corner lot and lots 18,19, and 2, Block 4 20 Ft — for existing home on Lot 1, Block 1 Side Setback 10 Ft 7.5 Ft (min) Rear Setback 30 Ft 30 Ft (min) Lot Impervious 50% 55% (max) 8. A stormwater re -use system, as shown in the plans, shall be constructed with the development. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by staff. The system will be installed by the applicant, and owned/operated/maintained by the homeowner's association. A stormwater reuse agreement shall be reviewed an approved by staff and recoded at Washington County. Resolution 2020 - Page 3 9. The developer has indicated that an HOA will be established for the development to own/operate/maintain community areas, landscaping, and the water re -use system. The HOA documents shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the recording of the final plat for the Phase 1. 10. The developer must comply with the following, prior to Final Plat and Final PUD Plan application approval: Landscaping and Lighting a. The applicant shall include additional coniferous (evergreen) trees along the south side of Lot 20, Block 4, to provide a buffer from Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). b. The applicant shall include additional landscaping at the entrance off of Goodview Avenue creating a defined main entrance into the development. c. The applicant shall include additional landscaping around a portion of the lift station. d. The monument sign location, design, and landscaping, shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to installation. e. A final landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by Staff. a. The exact locations and design of the street lights will be evaluated with each final plat application. The street lights be decorative and shall comply with the City standards for street lighting within the public right-of-way. Signage a. Final design, location, and landscaping of the entrance monument signage for the development shall be reviewed and approved by staff. Streets/Access a. The developer shall address all comments in the Washington County comment letter dated November 7, 2019. i. Plans for street connections to CSAH 8 shall be reviewed and approved by the Washington County ii. All permits required from Washington County shall be issued. Resolution 2020 - Page 4 Architecture a. The developer shall develop and implement architectural review and design guidelines for all residential buildings. Architectural design guidelines shall be reviewed approved by City staff. Open Space and Trails a. The preliminary plat and PUD general plan shall be revised to include a neighborhood gathering space in the general location of Lots 1-3, Block 3, are shown in the plan as previously proposed. i. The plans shall include landscaping and amenities. b. The plans shall be revised to include a trail along Street A south to Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). The trail shall be installed and paid for by the developer. Miscellaneous a. The applicant shall revise the lot depth for Lot 1, Block 1, to be in compliance with the rear yard setback of 30 feet. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6t" day of January, 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Resolution 2020 - Page 5 PARCEL I OESCRhONOM (Per Schedule A of Titre Commitment No. rJN52807, with a commitment date of Apr? 24th, 2019 of &00 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Campany as issuing agents Stewart title Guaranty Company ) That part of the North Half of the Nw-thwest 0 -i -ter of $potion 28 Towaship 31 North, Rang¢ 71 Wesf, Washu+gton County Minneaoto described oa !allows: Commencing at the Saufheast tamer of ecid North HoJF of the Northwest thence W terly, along the Soath Fine of sold North Podf of the Nra-thwest 4uor{e,, 1214.16 feet, thence N—fherfy, purdief with the East line of said North Paff of the Northwest Quorfer, 854.06 fee' to the point a! beglnning; thence continuing Nwtherfy, pavallef wtth said East As, 436 feet, more or less, to the North Hne of sold Section 28; thence Westedy, along said North line, 1438 feet, more or toss, to the West Rne of said Section 26; thence Southerly, afong .mid Weat fine. 438 feet, more or lean, to its 7nterseation wlth a fine drawn Westerly, por.Ffel with the South Fine of sold North Half of the Northwest Q—ter, from the paint of beginning; thence Easterly, along said poraffel Fine, 1435 Feet, mare a leas, to the po7nf of beginning, Washington Canty, Mfnnesafa. (Abstract Property) PARCEL 2 DESViTPfXW. (Per SchedWe A of TrUe Commitment No. MN5J001, with o commitment date of Apnl 30th, 2019 at 8:00 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Company as issuing agents Stewart Title R—onty Compony ) That pmt of the North Half of the Northwest Qrorter of Section 2$ Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County Minnesota, described as fellows: Commencing at the so Aheasi comer of sold North Half of the Northwest Quarter; thence westm'y along the South fine of said North Half of the Northwest Qaar[er, 72!4.10 feet; thence nartherfy, poro176 with the l=ast One of said North Half of the Northwest Ouorter, 446.40 toot to the point of beginning; thence continuing northerly, poratfel with sold East fine, 437.66 feet; thence westerly parallel with the South line of said Morth Nott of the Narthwest rluarter, 1435 feet, more or fess, to the West Ane of said Section 28; thence southerfy, of -g said West floe, 478 feet, more or less, to its intersection with a Fine drawn westerfy, paraflcf with the South k o of said North Half of the Northwest Q—ter from the pant of beg:nn+ng; thence easterly, &ang sold parallel 1fie, r4J3 feet, more or less, to the paint of beginning, (Abstract Praperty� PARCEL 3OC31MPf]W1". (Per 5chedWe A of Trite Commitment No. MN52809, with o commitment date of April 24th, 2079 at S. A.M.. prepared by Partners Title Company os issuing agents 5tewart Titre Qirnanty Company ) That part of the Northwest 0—ter of the Northwest Cuarter of Sectfon 28. Township 31 North. flange 21 West. Washington County Minnesota, J-,Ibed as follows: Commencing of the southeast tamer of the North Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 28: thence westorfy, along the South line of sold North Half of the Northwest Gala -ter. 1474.54 feet to the point of beginning; thence northerly, paralfsl with the East Rna of said North Half of the Northwest Ouorter. 446.40 feet; thence westerly, parallel with the South Fine of said North Half of the Northwest 4uarter, 1792 feet, mare ar Fess, to the West fine of said Sectfon 2& thence sou ihedy. arong said West ion e. 446 4 feet, more or Jess. to the sea M west comer of said North Haff of the Northwest Quarte . thence easterly War the South fine or said North Haff of the Northwest Qirnl ff. 1169 Feet more or less. to the part of beginning. (Abstract Property) PARCEL 4 LIESCP/PTiAv (Per So?-awo A of Uve Commitment No. MN6d003, with o commitment dote of April 30th, 7019 at 8.00 Au-, peeporoo by Partners Title Compony os issuing agents stewort etre Caoronry Company ) Thai port of the North Half of the Nothwesi Quarter of Section 26 (IndlOrng voted roadway per Document No- 53455}), Tol,,rshrp 31 North, Range 21 West, Wpahinpton County, Mlnrlesoto described as fohpw5 Commencing at the soulheaat comer of said North Half of fhe Northwest Quarter, thence westerly along the South line of surd North Hnlf of the Norfhweat Quarter, 427.60 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel to be descrlbed; thence northerly, pardlef with the East line of sold North Haff of the Northwest quarter, 446,40 feet; thence westerfy, parallel with the South fine of said North Neff of the Northwest Quarter, 1047.04 Feet; thence swfh.0y, paroffel with the East line of said North Half of the Northwest quarter, 446,40 feet to the South if— of said North Batt of the Northwest quarter; thence easterly, d-9 said south 17ne, 1047,94 Feet to the point of begfnning. Washington County, Mfnnesoto. (Abstract Property) RESOLUTION 2020 - APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR FENWAY LAND COMPANY FOR "RICE LAKE RESERVE" ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF GOODVIEW AVENUE NORTH AND NORTH OF EGG LAKE ROAD (CSAH 8) WHEREAS, Fenway Land Company, has requested approval of a preliminary plat to allow construction of approximately 93 single family lots and 3 outlots on the 51.5 acre property legally described as follows: (See Attached) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the preliminary plat at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Fenway Land Company, for a preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved to allow the creation of 93 single family home lots and 3 outlots, in accordance with the application and plans received by the City on October 23, 2019, November 15, 2019, and December 4, 2019, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of a rezoning to PUD for the 5 1. 1 acre site. 3. The developer must comply with Resolution 2020- , for the PUD. 4. The developer must comply with all conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memos dated December 12, 2019 and all red -lined comments provided to the applicant. 5. Park Dedication is proposed to be satisfied by fee. The park dedication fee shall be paid for each lot platted at the amount of $2,400.00. 6. A stormwater re -use system, as shown in the plans, shall be constructed with the development. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by staff. The system will be installed by the applicant, and owned/operated/maintained by the homeowner's association. A stormwater reuse agreement shall be reviewed an approved by staff and recoded at Washington County. 7. The developer has indicated that an HOA will be established for the development to own/operate/maintain community areas, landscaping, and the water re -use system. The HOA documents shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the recording of the final plat for the Phase 1. Resolution 2020 - Page 2 8. The building setbacks and impervious surface requirements for the development are as follows: 9. Outlot Use and Ownership: Outlot R-3 55' Wide Use ZoningLots 10.52 City of Hugo District B Front Setback 30 Ft 30 Ft (min) Homeowners Association Monument Sign 25 Ft - side of home on (HOA) a corner lot and lots 16.77 City of Hugo 18,19, and 2, Block 4 20 Ft — for existing home Management and on Lot 1, Block 1 Side Setback 10 Ft 7.5 Ft min Rear Setback 30 Ft 30 Ft (min) Lot Impervious 50% 55% max 9. Outlot Use and Ownership: Outlot Acres Ownership Use A 10.52 City of Hugo Wetlands B .22 Development Landscaping and Homeowners Association Monument Sign (HOA) C 16.77 City of Hugo Stormwater Management and Wetlands 10. The landscaping planned for the development shall be installed all at the same time during each phase. The developers shall take proper precautions to protect the trees as the homes are being built. 11. The developer must comply with the following, prior to Final Plat and Final PUD Plan application approval: Landscaping and Lighting a. The applicant shall include additional coniferous (evergreen) trees along the south side of Lot 20, Block 4, to provide a buffer from Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). Resolution 2020 - Page 3 b. The applicant shall include additional landscaping at the entrance off of Goodview Avenue creating a defined main entrance into the development. c. The applicant shall include additional landscaping around a portion of the lift station. d. The monument sign location, design, and landscaping, shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to installation. e. A final landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by Staff. f. The exact locations and design of the street lights will be evaluated with each final plat application. The street lights be decorative and shall comply with the City standards for street lighting within the public right-of-way. Signage a. Final design, location, and landscaping of the entrance monument signage for the development shall be reviewed and approved by staff. Streets/Access a. The developer shall address all comments in the Washington County comment letter dated November 7, 2019. i. Plans for street connections to CSAH 8 shall be reviewed and approved by the Washington County ii. All permits required from Washington County shall be issued. Architecture a. The developer shall develop and implement architectural review and design guidelines for all residential buildings. Architectural design guidelines shall be reviewed approved by City staff. Open Space and Trails a. The preliminary plat and PUD general plan shall be revised to include a neighborhood gathering space in the general location of Lots 1-3, Block 3, are shown in the plan as previously proposed. i. The plans shall include landscaping and amenities. b. The plans shall be revised to include a trail along Street A south to Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). The trail shall be installed and paid for by the developer. Resolution 2020 - Page 4 Miscellaneous a. The applicant shall revise the lot depth for Lot 1, Block 1, to be in compliance with the rear yard setback of 30 feet. b. The developer must obtain all necessary stormwater management and WCA permits from the City. c. The development shall comply with the Fire Chief's requirements regarding fire flow calculations, the location of fire hydrants, fire department connections, and fire lane signage. d. The Homeowners Association (HOA) documents for review and approval by staff. e. The developer shall obtain all necessary local, state, and federal permits. 12. Prior to the release of a final plat for recording, the developer must comply with the following conditions: f. The City's development fees will apply to this project. The fee amounts will be calculated and included as part of the Development Agreement. A development agreement shall be executed and all fees shall be paid. g. Park Dedication shall be paid for each lot platted in the amount of $2,400 per lot. 13. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer must comply with the following conditions. a. The applicant shall record the final plat, development agreement and all other documentation at Washington County and provide the City with proof of recording. Resolution 2020 - Page 5 ADOPTED by the City Council this 6�h day of January, 2020 Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Resolution 2020 - Page 6 PAIMn 7 OE5CR/P710N (Per Schedufe A of W. Commitment No. MN52807, wrfh v rommitmerit date of April 24th, 2019 at 8:00 A-V., prepared by Partners Tlf1e Cvmpeny as issuing agents Stewart Title 0—rify Cornpony ) Tho( port of rho N'th Hof aF the Northwest Ct+ortw of 5ection 20, Township 31 North. Range 2? Wesf. Wostrn-91 n County Minnesota described as r lfo— Cvmmvncing .t the Svuthovs( comer vF said North Hol.f the Northwest Quarter; thence W terry, afong the South tine of said North Half of the Northwest (hrorter, 1214.10 feet, thence Northerly, pardlel wish the East line of said North Haff of the Northwest Q—ter, 884.06 feet to the poent of beginning; thence can NnuMq Northerly, parairW wtth said East Nne, 436 feet, mare or less, to the North line of -id Section 28; thence Westerly, along said North Rne, ?438 feet, more or Is-, to the West lfne, of —a Seaffoh 28; thence Southerly, along soid West fine. 438 feet, more or less, ?o its rn?erseotioa wtth a Rae drawn A k.Hy, p ... Y.1 with the South line of sold North half of the Northwest Quarter, from the point of beginnfng; thence Easterly, afong acid p—HJ line. 1435 feet, mare er less, to the pofnf of beginning, WashMgton Cavaty, Minnesota. (Abstrocf Property) PARM 2 OE5CWIIa .. (Per SchedWe A of NOV CommitrriW No. MN57001, with v Commitment date of Apnif 70th, 2019 of 8.:00 A.M., prepared by Partners Trite Company as issuing agents Stewart Title GV.ranty Company ) That port of the North Half of the Northwest (Worter of 5ectfon Z6, Townshrp 37 North, Range 27 West, Washington County MFnnesoto, deswrbed os followx Commencing at the s.uthe-t comer of mid North Haff of the Northwest @tarter; thence westerly, aJC,g the Scarth tine of s.rd North Hoff of the NarMi—t quarter, 1214.10 feet; thence northerfy, poroffN .4th the Lost line of said North HdF of the Northwest Qtr—W,, 446.40 test to the point of beg—g; thence cantlri-g northerly, poraflel wtth soid East fine, 437.66 feet; thence westerly pora➢ef with the South fine of sold North Hof of the Northwest W.rtn, 1435 fee; more or fess, to the West A- vT said Sectfon 28; thence southerly, .long -INd Wesf fine, 438 feet, more or fess, to its intersection Wth aline drawn westerfy, pwaffel wtth the South Nne of said North Half of the Northwest Rucrter from the pant vi begin—ng; thence eo mNy, along said pwcllet line, 1433 feet, mare or fes% to the point of beglnnmg, (A6stmct Property) PARGEL 3 0E5YWF?7WY. (Per Scheduie A of retie Cummitment No. MN52809, with o commitment date of April 24th. 2079 ut 6r 00 A.M., prepared by Partners Tr(le Company as issuing agents 5tewart Titre Gu—ify Company ) That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Sectfon 213. Township 37 North, Range 21 W -L Washrnglon County. 91 --to, descrfbed os follows: Commenaing at the southeast comer of the North Neff of the Northwest Queter of soid Section 2&' thence westerly, along the South fine of mid North Half of the Northwest l]uwter, 1474.64 feet to the paFnt of beginnlrtg: thence northerry, parallel .0th the Eost this vi said North Hulf of the Northwest Quarte. 445.40 reef; thence westerly, pa'OV with the South doe of -id North Hall of the Northwest Cuarter, 1772 feet. more ail less, to the lyest fine of -id Section 2& thence si,Ahedy. along soid West fine. 4415.4 feet. more or fess, to the southwest comer of said North Haff of the Northwest Quarte , thence easterly, afong the Svrrth fens of said North Hdf of the Northwest Lkrorter, 1169 feeL more of Vers. 1. the pant of beginning. (Abstract Property) PARCEL 4 DESA4,'PTirAV; (Per Sah*orW I A of 1784 Commitment No. MN53003, with o comm:tment dote of Aprir 30th, 2019 of 800 Au-, prepwoo by Porteers Trtro Compooy as ''souiiq agents Stewart Titre Cuaronty Company ) That port of the North Half of the Northwest prorter of Section 26 (in Wading vaooted roadway par poeumerrt No. 534561), Township 3i North, Ra•:gff %' west, Vvash�ngtnn aunty, Mfnaesota desc"60 as fo+tows: Colmeaaing of the southeast comer of soid North Half of the Northwest quorter, thence westerly afong the South fine of said North Ho?f of the Nvrthwost 427.50 feet to the pant of beg.rnfng of the parcel to be desorlbed; thence northerly, parWle1 with the Easf flue of -A North Holl of the Northwest Quarter, 446.40 Poet; thence westerly, paradef with the South line of safd North Half of the Northwest Quarter, }047.174 feet; thence swthedy, p—R.1 with the Eost fine of sold North HWf of the Narthwea? Quarter, 446.40 feet to the South l,he of safd North halt of the Northwest Quarter; thence easterly, long said south Nne, 1047.94 Feet to the point of bnNnfngWashington County, Mlnnesoto. (Abstract Property) 7. 0 0 C7 Z W CO U) 0 00 00ID 0 0 N W F U) W W W 00 wsb December 12, 2019 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Preliminary Plat Review Rice Lake Reserve WSB Project No. 015057-000 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the revised preliminary plat submittal for the Rice Lake Reserve development located east of Goodview Avenue and north of County Road 8. In particular, we have reviewed the following plans related to this particular request: • Rice Lake Reserve Preliminary Plat, Utility, Grading, Erosion Control and Detail Plan Sheets dated 12/4/19 by Carlson McCain • Stormwater Management Plan dated 10/22/19 by Carlson McCain • Phasing Plan Sheet dated 12/4/19 by Carlson McCain • Shoreland Exhibit dated 10/22/19 by Carlson McCain • Stormwater Design Rational Worksheet and Drainage Map dated 12/4/19 by Carlson McCain • Geotechnical Report dated 7/8/19 by Haugo Geotechnical Services Based on the review of the revised preliminary plat documents, we offer the following comments related to this application: Preliminary Plat 1. The entirety of Outlots A and C are appropriately encompassed in Drainage and utility easements. 2. Front, side, and rear yard drainage and utility easements are shown. Easements where storm sewer and watermain extend between lots are identified with appropriate widths. Grading, Phasing, Street, and Utility Plans 3. Staff has worked through a number of comments with Carlson McCain on street and utility construction plans. Staff has a number of remaining redline comments. We do not expect that any remaining plan changes will have an impact on the preliminary plat. We will issue the construction plan approvals once the remaining comments have been resolved. 4. Project phasing has been reviewed and the project can be constructed in a manner that allows street and utility construction to occur without extending into or coming from future phases. Mass grading is expected to take place over the entire development with the exception of that portion of phase three that includes the cul-de-sac S:\Users\R_Juba\Rachel\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\Rice Lake Reserve\Pre Plat & PUD\Engineers Memo 12-12-19.docx Ms. Rachel Juba December 12, 2019 Page 2 5. Water service is proposed to be extended from the Goodview Avenue/Geneva Avenue Intersection. Staff has recommended connecting to the existing 12" watermain and extend 12" watermain through the development to Egg Lake Road that meets the goal of the comprehensive water system plan. 6. Sanitary sewer will be extended from the 4" forcemain provided to this location in 2004 as part of the Goodview Avenue Improvement Project as the site was deemed to require a sanitary sewer lift station to service this area. The lift station will be sized and placed at an elevation that will allow for the extension of gravity sanitary sewer to serve the adjacent area up to and including the Hugo Public Work facility. If lift station upsizing is required, the City of Hugo would be responsible for oversizing costs. 7. The initial phase of this development gains street access from Goodview Avenue. The access is appropriately aligned with Geneva Avenue and perpendicular to Goodview Avenue. 8. The trail needs to be added along Street A to allow for the extension to Rice Lake Park. 9. Access to Egg Lake Road is proposed to occur in Phase 3. The applicant shall provide Washington County approved construction plans and permit for the construction of turn lanes as identified in their November 7, 2019 review letter prior to construction of phase 1. 10. An existing easement extends along the east and north east portion of the development for "highway purposes". That portion of easement no longer needed will require vacation. Stormwater Management 11. The applicant has submitted a draft of their Stormwater Management Plan for the site. The applicant will be utilizing water reuse to irrigate the development and meet a majority of the stormwater management requirements for volume reduction, rate control, and water quality. Stormwater comments provided to the applicant have not been fully addressed. Applicant has stated that stormwater comments will be addressed in future submittals. 12. The stormwater reuse system will be owned and operated by the Homeowners Association, and the City will have access to the system as needed for monitoring and operation. The applicant is meeting approximately 80% of the volume reduction requirement by utilizing water reuse. The remaining volume control requirement could be met using dead pool storage provided in the NURP ponds. Wetland 13. The wetland delineation has been approved. 14. The applicant needs to address several items from WCA Replacement Plan Checklist. Primarily the Technical Evaluation Panel will likely be concerned with the wetland impact from lot 1, block 3 and adjacent trail. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. Additional comments may be necessary following the review of the responses to these. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463. Sincerely, WSB Mark Erichson, PE City Engineer Ms. Rachel Juba December 12, 2019 Page 3 cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) Washington County November 7. 2019 Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 RE: Rice Creek Reserve Dear Rachel: Public Works Department Donald J. Theisen, P.E. Director Wayne H. Sandberg, P.E. Deputy Director/County Engineer We have reviewed the.Preliminary Plat of Rice Creek Reserve dated 10/22/2019, in Section 28, City of Hugo. The project consists of 90 lot subdivision on 51.54 acres of land with access to County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 8 / Egg Lake Road N. and Goodview Avenue N. The project will involve grading, installation of public and private infrastructure, local road improvements, stormwater ponds and the construction of single family residential homes. Based on the plans submitted, we offer the following comments: • The future right-of-way width along CSAH 8/Egg Lake Road is 120 feet (60 feet from the centerline of the roadway). The preliminary plat identifies 50 feet from the centerline east of CSAH 8/Egg Lake Road, outside of the plat and 33 feet from the centerline south and west of CSAH 8/Egg Lake Road, outside of the plat. Please verify if the future 60 foot right- of-way impacts Blk 4, Lot 20 on the preliminary plat. • The access point on CSAH 8/Egg Lake Road is acceptable to the County. A Washington County access permit will be required from the City of Hugo for the new local street. • The Bypass Lane on Page 7 of 13, Preliminary Site and Utility Plan is not acceptable. A westbound right- turn lane and a center left- turn lane should be constructed. A plan section shall be reviewed and approved by the county traffic engineer. • The Washington County Comprehensive Plan 2040 does not identify a county or regional trail along this section of CSAH 8/Egg Lake Road. If the City of Hugo plans to connect the identified trail within the development to the park land to the east, within county right-of-way, it must be approved by the county engineer • Washington County's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPGA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise 11660 Myeron Road North, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-9573 Phone: 651-430-4300 • Fax: 651-430-4350 • TTY: 651-430-6246 www.co.washington.mn.us Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Rice Creek Reserve November 7, 2019 Page 2 Area Classification (NAC) where the establishment of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. Minnesota Statute 116.07, Subpart 2a exempts County Roads and County State Aid Highways from noise thresholds. County policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The developer should assess the noise situation and take any action outside of County right of way deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise. • A Right of Way Permit will be required for any work in the right- of -way as it relates to the development. A plan set is required with the application and include any grading, installation of culverts, installation of water and sewer services, left and right turn lanes on CSAH 6/Egg Lake Road, parallel trail grading, signage and any landscaping and other improvements within County right- of -way. All utility connections for the development require Washington County Right of Way Permits. Typically, these are the responsibility of the utility companies. If you have and additional questions regarding this proposal, please contact me at ann.oung- terwedoCa)co washington mn us. Please contact Carol Hanson at Carol. hanson@co washington mn us for the Washington County Right -of -Way Permit and Access Permit applications. Regards, ((II __')1 lr� � / L1 Ann Pung-Terwedo Senior Planner Cc: Carol Hanson, Office Specialst Rice Lake Reserve Hugo, MN December 12, 2019 Project Narrative Rice Lake Reserve consists of 4 different properties on 51.54 acres situated on the NE corner of Egg Lake Road N and Goodview Lane N. Bordered by some 20.92 acres of wetland, Rice Lake Reserve will create a connection with the natural surroundings along with connecting the community to its eastern Park. The community will provide a mix of one and two-story housing styles that market to multiple generations of buyers. The community is being developed by Fenway Land Company and homes will be built/sold by MI Homes. Request We are seeking approval for Preliminary Plat and PUD for the 51.54 -acre site. The proposed 93 home community creates a gross density of 1.80 homes per acre. The net developable area of 29.56 acres creates a net density of 3.15 homes per acre which is still below the R-3 zoning district of 4 homes per acre. The typical lot width is 55' with an average area of 6350 square feet along with home sizes ranging from 1500 SF to 2600 SF. Side yard setbacks are 7.5' and 7.5'. Buyers today are less interested in a large yard and large homes that they must maintain. The PUD allows for flexibility in the standard zoning code. Providing housing within the City that creates a sense of community between multiple generations of homeowners, preserves the natural surroundings of the property, and is reasonable in price are the main reasons that a PUD makes the most sense for this property. The deviations we are requesting from the standard zoning code are for lot size, lot width, lot side setbacks, impervious lot area increased from 50% to 55%, front setback on 3 lots to 25' (L18, 19, 20 134) to avoid wetland encroachment, side setback on L14 B4 to 25', and side setback to 20' L20, B4 and front yard setback to 20' on L1, 131 for the existing homes that will be staying. In evaluating the criteria specified in the zoning code, Rice Lake Reserve is offering the following in exchange for flexibility: -Preserving natural features - Of the 20.92 acres of wetlands, only .54 acres are impacted. The majority of these impacts are in the middle of site where stormwater ponding will be located. The wetlands to the north and south are preserved with natural views for the residents. Trees along east side of Goodview will remain as a natural buffer. -Trail Connection — a 2875' trail will connect Goodview to Egg Lake Road by meandering around the pond and through the community. This connection will also allow residents in neighboring communities to gain safer access to Hanifl Park on the east side of town. -Storm Water Reuse — The development will utilize the ponding system for an irrigation system that covers common areas, park area, and residents' yards. This helps with meeting the site infiltration requirements along with conserving City water needed for homes and businesses. Rice Lake Reserve — Narrative for PUD/Preliminary Plat Fenway Land Company -Architectural Design — MI Homes has shown their design success within the City with their Villa Homes. This product will be provided in Rice Creek Reserve along with a new two-story product that is equally attractive. The plans have multiple elevations and color packages available for buyers. -Future Utilities — With the completion of Rice Creek Reserve, the City will have the ability to extend sewer and water service to the Public Works building which is currently on septic and well. -Stand Alone Community — Rice Lake Reserve is set out on a parcel of land with only Diamond Pointe South located to the west side of Goodview. This community has little to no impacts on adjacent landowners and provides connectivity for other existing developments. Housing Styles MI Homes will be the sole builder for the entire community. MI has successfully designed homes that meet the needs of buyers today. Their product offering for the community will be the single level living homes as built in Adelaide Landing along with a new 2 and 3 car garage two-story home style that attract families and young professionals to the community. The elevations of the homes are included in the packet of information. Homes will range from 1750 SF to 3500 SF, one and two-story homes, mostly basement lots with a handful of slab on grade lots, and estimated price starting from mid -300's. Material specifications include Hardi siding on the front, vinyl siding on 3 sides, and variety of stone/shakes/board and batten on the front elevations. There are multiple color packages available as well to enhance the street scape. Streets The overall street design minimizes the amount homes that are back to back, providing the residents with natural views from their homes. The streets are designed to City standards and widths for public roads. Open Space and Trail Area Rice Lake Reserve will have open spaces located near the Goodview entrance and overlook of wetlands at the intersection of Street A and Street B. With Hanifl Park to the east this community only requires some natural overlook areas for the residents. The trail system will lead in each direction to Goodview and Egg Lake. With the connection to Egg Lake, the City will now have the opportunity to complete a connection to the Hanifl Park. In addition to the trail, concrete sidewalks will be installed on one side of the streets connecting to the trail. Rice Lake Reserve will have an established Homeowners Association that maintains common area landscaping, the irrigation system, and have architectural control. All yard maintenance and snow removal will be performed or contracted by individual owners. Rice Lake Reserve — Narrative for PUD/Preliminary Plat Fenway Land Company Phasing Rice Lake Reserve will be constructed in 3 phases with the entrance located off Goodview Lane. Construction will plan to start in spring of 2020 on phase 1, phase 2 in 2021, and the last phase in 2022. Contacts Developer Fenway Land Company Mark Guenther 13925 Fenway Blvd N Hugo, MN 55038 651.425.0469 mark@fenwaylandco.com Engineer Carlson McCain, Inc. Brian Krystofiak 3890 Pheasant Ridge Dr. NE #100 Blaine, MN 55449 763.489.7905 bkrystofiak@carlsonmccain.com Rice Lake Reserve — Narrative for PUD/Preliminary Plat Fenway Land Company ., 3 7jr po ■ f J �• y x �yv 1 'CZA 6"66i A.P m �i Its X I m '-m Is I NJ Www - Nip �� T -71 EMMA �� y L � _ �'w' �ti °�� /� y v `� -.� ___�. _ _ ret *.•pii ��LLyyyy�� f L i �7����iY� � � ', �� � � = k- tU.=. E .. _ • �;`� . �� r� � ��:Q�� ''!'� • t . �' y �' '�. � '�� , � � � Y: . � 4 VICINITY MAP �I LIGE LAKE RESERVE N �i HUGO, MINNESOTA ? RICE II I I LAKE II I PaqO LAKE I OUTLOT A S. III I lW N s \ l 1 SII g SITE ENEyq 1 \ 2 3 4 5 6 w -4p 7 8 0 �_ — 9 10 `�- 11 — — — 11 12 I NOT TO SCALE ST3 14 15 16 RFErc 17 — — — — - �\ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 18 Z \ _ 11 13 12 19 __ 14 15 16 > � I��I �� 17 20 � Q 1 1 I I 1 OUTLOT C p 21 W lI II v, OUTLOT C I ol�l II /A---'� -� 22 I 1 15 14 2 23 —76 — 1-3- — — -- 11 17 14 5 9 10 11 12 13 N 18 `ST,QF 9 8 7 6 �' S�Rg 7 8 15 fr \ \ 19FT 5 6 6 20 6 i 2 4 1 2 3 V 22 OUTLOT C �� 31 32 , \ � 23 --- \ _ (n 24 30 i 1 Q 5D QD 2QQ 2526 27 28 (IN FEET) d� © 137cT BENCHMARK o- DD \ i x - j-ts — i MNDOT c.oaena Mo�"merc 1— Po"I NrvDT Re:er, 20 GSID Station No. 9 0. El u. = —.38F MNDOT Neotlgtic 8]M n=mev a Ea91e, GSID Station 50�E 932.39 FT. I of o 1I ! 0 - --- --- - SHEET INDEX �y� 1. COVER ` CALL BEFORE YOU DIG P`r$P1 ° 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 11 �. 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT INDEX IGG �, P 'i' 4-6. PRELIMINARY PLAT 0 lG \ 7. PRELIMINARY SITE & 1 Q � 1 � UTILITY PLAN ° 4 8. PRELIMINARY GRADING INDEX 9-11. PRELIMINARY GRADING & ow. natrs below. CaII before Ou dl EROSION CONTROL PLANS y 9' I FP 12-13. DETAILS T1 -T5. TREE PRESERVATION PLANS The subsurface Dtility information shown on this plan is utility L1. LANDSCAPE PLANS Quality Level D. This quality level was determined according to the guidelinesof CI/ASCE 38-D2, entitled "Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Ent.." Revisions: i (j Carlson 3890Blaine,MN Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 orhereby report was ethatred this or under Print Name: f Drawn K0.0 2/4/19 per City Comments FE N WAY LAND COMPANY RICE LAKE RESERVE 1 •environmental ine, MN 55449 or report was prepared by me or under my engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and that I am a duly signature: a // Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North COVER Of surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota McCain www.Carlsonmccain.com the laws ofthe State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 13 ( -, PARCEL, --(Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. M e",, wiM a commitment date of "n, 24th, 2019 at 8:00 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Company as issuing agents Stewart Title Guaranty A/ N I 1 1 1 �� % L) A N I /x E- 7 company) N - 6° 956ft`p `11_�u lJ I V L ly I lJ VV I V .� rjL_ L I Northwest corner 4 Section 28, Townshi OWNER: , Q - That part of the No. Half of Me Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Townshiv 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota described t lolE-t Commencing at H Southeast corner of said North Half of the P DIAMOND POINT MASTER 03,3 S89°4351E NorMwest Quarter, thmre Westerlyc 10.i , bAn line of said h -i Half of the NwNwesl Ouarfer, 1214.10 feet; tM1ence Northerly, parallel with the East line of said North Hal/ a/ Me Northwest Quarter, 884.06 feet 131, Range 21r (Co under water) PID 27-031-21-34-0033 1437 m Ma Paint o/ beginning; Menre ontinuing Northerly, parallel with said East line, 436 feet mo e w less, be the Nweh line of said Section 28; thence Westerly, along said Nwih line, 1438 Tat, mora or lege to the er - - West line of said Section 28; thence Sout-A along said West line 438 feet more or less, to Its intersection with a line drown WesteNy. Parallel I. the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Ouorter. ham \ \ the point of beginning; thence Ee,teny, along said parallel line, 1435 feet more or less, to fbe point of beginning, Washington County, MinnesOto. e _ = aW aW era era era era era era era alta ova arc b ' E ^ I era a Abstract Pro ert ( Ewm ) ( P YJ k L North line of Section 28 1 /♦ T 1 1 �% /♦ Township 31, Range 21 PARCEL POESCR/PI)OM (Per Scriedule A of Title Commitment No. MN53001, witF a commitment tlafe of April 30th. 2019 of 8:00 A.M., prepared by Poriners Title Company s Iss g gents Stewart Title Guaranty I I s .., C_ v I I V\I v � ♦,, j � — I � WETLAND -- � Q,mpany ) I - a u1n a 1 6 O I/ That pel oI the NortM1 Holf of the NorMwest Quarter of Section 28 T -hi 31 North Ron a 21 Wesf WasM1in ten Count Minnesota described as /allows: awe J` J` alley aV" a4% aV" �� a4 aV\ sV" sV" sV" awe awe aV' aV' I aV' / Commencing o1 the southeast corner of said North Hal/ o/ the 1-m-d,-1-thenre weateny along the South line of said North Hol/ of the N-1-1 quarter, 121410 feet; thence northerly, parallel with the East \\ \ \/ _ Ilfethe Nwthwesth Dual A, 1435 feet,Y mo earl less 4t6,,. 40 eeWest Ilne ofosatid Sectonnl28; mth ance con1-1y,9 along staid Westl knelt 4381/e t,smolre o I— toe its tntersecte terwith arollna drawnthe.-dy, Ip-diilSWidhN�tah Half WETLAND) I J I �\ -� 1 I _ I South line of said North Half of the NorMwest Quarter from the point of beginning; thence easteny, along said parallel line, 1433 feet, more ar less, to the point of beginning. (Ahstr°cl Property) I 'w` / `♦� 're 're /`A !r'P \ 4�+� \ _ \ 'r` 'r` \ 'r` 'r`_� 30ESCR/PIIGW (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. MN52809, with a commitment date of April 24th, 2019 at 6:00 A.M, prepared by Partne-s Title Company as issuing agents Stewart Title Guaranty \a ARGGulf _ ^ ---' cam on P Y) Thal part o{ the Norfnw-1 Quetta- of the Northwest Warter of Section 2R, Tow -p 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, described -follows: Commencing at the southeast comer o/ the North tE Qa / }__________ - -__'� PID: 28.031.21.22.0002 -_ --- -- ------ ----------- rip ry X I I / ` Hall of fM1e Northwest Quarter of said Section 28; Mence westeN, elan the Sou[It line of said Nor[It Half of me Northwest Quwter. 7474.64 feet to me ,int o/ De ronin ; tnence ...meN, ...1W with the Eext line Title Commitment N�' MN5F.U0 I - /-�- / j I b \� 01 said North el of the Northwest Ovorter, 846.40 feet; thence westUly, pomllel with the South line of said North Holl of the Northwest Quarter, 1112 feet more or less I. the Wesf line of said Section 28; thence outilerly, along said West line. 446.4 feet, m e or less, to the southwest comer or said North Hali o/ the Northwest Quarter, thence easterly. along Me South line of said North Hal/ of the Northwest Quarter, 1169 V L� feet, more or less, to the point of be r c I r ginn,ng ar (Abstract Property) 928-- I t \ PARCEL 4 DESCR/PI)OM (Per Scriedule A of Title Commitment No. MN53003, witD a commitment tlafe of April 30tF. 2019 at 8:00 A. K. prepared by Partners Title Company as iswing agents Stewart Title Guaranty /_� \ \ ��� \ Company ) Coin Wood ref I t I < ink /encs /— \ _� \ a4 a4 a4 ♦r+ ale \ �- a4 Thai f o/ the North Half ,f the NorMwest Quarter o/ Section 28 rJudin toted roodwo Document No. 534551 TnwnsFi 31 North, Ran 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota deaonbad oa foll°wa: 'Irg<�olhaB we a / / \ ♦ I \ Par (in 9 va Y Per ), P 9a ✓ -- - n / o �` / \ \ \ ` \ ��_ �.+ Commencing at the southeast corner o/ said North Hal/ a/ the NorMwest Quarter, thenre westeny, along the South line o/ said North Hal/ o/ the NorMwest Puarter, 42].60 feet to Me point o/ beginning of the Farrel I - - _ — ' / / \ \ \ t ✓ to be deswlbed; Mence northerly, parallel with the Eost Ilne of sold North Holf of the Northwest Quarter, 446.40 let; thence westerly, phmfiN wh the Soutb line of ,to With Holf of the Nolh-t Quarter, 104).04 11 I feet; thence -Whiny, parallel with Me East line of said North Half of the Northwest Ovarter, 446.40 feet to the South line of said North Half of Me Northwest Quarter; thence easterly, along said south line, 104).04 s « e 6 m ` /� feet to Me t of be Wa 0 t taunt Minnesota. 59 Q' r � _ � � -- \\ \ _ \ \ � \ \ POIn ginnln9� 9 Y. ae x / d.Y M J. I i -sw lege9 ae _\ - 1295.7 FE (Abstract Property) 411 2 . tet. I sting j I I13M, 2019. J \ �\ \\�`26� ) e field thi work for s survey was c on une Line parallel with the South line of� 1Th �1� \ \ y2B � ° m IPalad e,I- �9 JJJ J / -the North 1/2 of the NN�7/4 f \ \ g X38 \ ° 2 Bearin shown are based on the North line of Section 28, Townshi 31, Ran 21, Washin ton Count Minnesota, / Section 28, Town hi 31, Ran ~ z \ \ ) ys p ge g Y. p \ _ s 9 to ` which is assumed to bear S89°43'51"E. L—fie�!,435_05 __!f —�/------�\\�- ^� 3) Easements for Public Highway per Ooc. No's. 489541 and 531059 a a be vacated o er the parcels being platted. 4) Above ground utilities have been {field located as shown. All underground locations shown Fereon a e APPROXIMATE. Prior fo any excavations w digging, contact Gopher Stale Ona Call /or an on-site location G \ \\ � \\ \\ 4%P♦Np` _ \(q (65 002. LEGEND \\ t ® - Denotes Set PK Nail -Denotes Guy Wire ------ -Denotes Watermain / 1 t♦ \ \ ` \ /'-\ y 1 \ \ — � \ \ - -'� \ \ \ ® - Denotes Washington County Monument, as noted 4, - Denotes Utility Pale FP - Denotes FEMA Floodplain l �� \ v _g26 �� 1 / / A V s3a - V A v • - Denotes Found Iron Monument o - Denotes Mail Box FM -Denotes Forcemain I \ O - Denotes 5/8 inch by 14 inch 11 -Denotes Telephone Box rebar, marked with RLS 40361 p » -Denotes Storm Sewer O q a I- �h _ A l �.♦ j�/� -Denotes Light Pole O -Denotes Electric Transformer _ Denotes Existing Fence as noted ) 1 �� A s 9 ❑ - Denotes Electric Box d N o 3 WET4AND ♦ ,_.� - Denotes Miscellaneous Sign w N I ♦/ `F, / _ - - 8 -Denotes Gravel Surface n PID PARCEL 2 004 _\\ �" xDOD.D - Denotes Existing Spot Elevation ® - Denotes Television Box I q� Opo+ i _ ---- - : �i-031.2 -,2/2-"-------�---- ------------ \ I o - Denotes Electric Meter - Denotes Concrete Surface FP dd o—dd------ /1 . 1/ -0 \s,N \ \ �`E °r - Denotes Existing Tree 0 Title ern ltment No. MN53001 \ o - Denotes Gas Meter Denotes Flag Pole - Denotes Bituminous Surface T /l IA/ AI v 11.v-.I—.I- were 11 -Denotes Underground Telephone aux 1 l/ VV I V ^ F7 1y32 `x ♦i 1, O -Denotes Water Manhole . . - Denotes Wetlands that w - Denotes Underground Electric ""- l; / \ ®°r ® - Denotes Catch Basin delineated by Kjolh aug I. I l FP /A 1 / �- ��♦ \ I j -♦� \ ( 1 - Denotes Underground Gas Environmental Services Inc. Al - Denotes Gate Valve a In 2019. r a Ime � ��' / _w �♦ � ♦♦ w,. �� � � -Denotes Underground Telev WETLAND r \♦ - o - Denotes Cleanout sten �a°o - Denotes Existing 2 Ft. Contour " //'/_ FPS / / \♦ 2 ,tl,_' ♦� '/`� aide \`are ♦ I I - Denotes Overhead Electric - Denotes Existing Well NwMern states Pow 142, campwy 111 ��•\ \ ♦ Q I / \ �\ / - Denotes Existing10 Ft. Contour I I Easement pet Book ge 203 '/' I \ I ♦ I A OWNER: I _a re. Me j \ 1, \ / / Easement for public highway Dr \ 7 I _ ((( OWNER: Do b t Noe. 489541 nd 531059 Y 3. M L RU H M SCHLET ' 5 \ V f I j \a -`x lUGENE & jHERESA ZERVA�S LIV %RS' ITo be Partlony wale) -PID: 28-031-21-21- 0 an fence - Ce tO �(1 / ♦ / 1 �� IV \ PID:28 31-21-27-00 ia�----,�--0 - -- --"--------------� - ---4= ----�1----------------� --- - -� III'— — — — — — — %-- j —\ — — —-- --,�7/ , enae T` - ---S89°46 7oE — �. ---- ��--- ---- �w tellI < _ fI I— 2.a Trre Ime �\ - fr. wit r - - TFT °f'`"a`y 7s 1934 1047.04'oh<s�f e `^Nx X - - - - - - - rw Ix ------------- ._mss / --- 15x14.5- -L scapin4 / 7 0� IL e -T----- \�� \ \ 30 JO _ p / ♦A line pa( net with the soQm nne� ♦ \ the Norf" 7/2 of the NW 1/4 of "'- an \�' / (- m. -m smmergxl ___ _ O III j\ tion 28�Township 31, Range etDming ' zea �� _� / r �b — �� - aux - ____- ______ tt �__ _ -- - _ -___ 7 �wi:1^ 1n glee —9az-�P�\ lro e . i "' p°bllc 11 -1r Par r "pr—N, n 01059 eaek ,( pwilbny we, ea) a -P.ARCEL V N 'a o o� �'ARCEk'4 -- s I 31 owNER: PID: 28.031.21.2 .000\3 —_� -- --1 ' o w ° _ - _ z 3 PID: 28.031.21.21.0 03ryae ine------__--- \ I z Ll & o�aRLorTE A ZERWAS f- --`� 5� \In /�'L� /� ID:28-31-21-27-0002 �I Title Commitment No. MN530 3 a l z I I bl I " I �� ♦ Title Commitment No MN r N /.a z r z�n III ,lie st ♦ ,w ,w ,n ,� ����� �\ \\ ��� =o _vzL� zz�♦� ���� �f �`5�„ 48,/ WETLAND v�, �v� vn �Zr f_= I ��_�--���� �� ���♦�_ 111 %I � ane aye' ane ane are are \ � �J i w o I / ,re / are are are ,rel l 1 F 1"/ `Y IIID R I \a°, ��♦ \\ \ e\✓ / �` i��►�._/ ��' \ ,t /_ '—i/� Vy/ I WETLAND rJaeNNlJvine I I I 1 E sf fine Of the North 1/2 ♦� Tree Ina , / = / I I3 o jar the N 1/4 of Section-_, ` ' South line of the �_______--y---- y __�� 2B, Tow ship 31, Range 21 \--- orth 1/2 Southwest Corner of the North 7/2 \ \ e Ime of the NW 1 4 of tion Z --of the NW 1/4 of Section 28, \T �\ Tree nna 2$ Townshi/31 a 21 I 1:^^ ��`H YTownship 31, Range 21 \ ---__ _ _ �\ - /^ 1 T v P I I I 1: /���I��+ N� '! ,lie aux aux aux aux aux ilM. 1169.29 'lie d! 'u'' -- -�L -T-J� ' ame aural, �x\j, 1 ame ame �Jle- ame 1 1� ^ 342760 216.33 — — \ 1474.64 _ II 6 1 Al �I / A /l r- -r I r N I l I � / �A- � ��°46'27"W OWNER: � .� V V I / `Y N V I 1 F 1 L_ I V V \ I / `Y NICOLE J,8 -B NJAMIN J LINDEN A 1 r A I IA/ 4 / A �' \ \ PIP�28-037 1-23-0008 / / / <C' V I L_ I / `t v\j I I �7 17 / 1 v VV ( / `T r % J- \. r Southeast ComeLof-_� ti I BENCHMARK D 40 80 160 d� �� /' / -ToriQ �g0 ; -'� the NgrI,1-�Df the I MNDOT G -k, Monument Named Paul MNDT Reset, I // ` 1' NW 1/4 Of Section 28, GSID Stat on No 94000 -b- _,l_ lewllan - 932.38 FT / aj Ven �. % / \ Tqw-hip 31, Range 21 MNDOT GMonument Named Eagle. GSID j / P1 - r II I stat on No.. _87. Elewl'on - 932.39 FT. ( SCALE IN FEET) � F .� v 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, 1.12/04/ FENWAY LAND COMPANY Carlson Suite , M I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name Thomas R Balluff, L.S. DRAWN BY: Bis 1.12/04/19 -Per City Comments • environmental Blaine, MN 55449 or report was prepared by me or under my /�9 RICE LAKE RESERVE (, • •engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 di rectsupervisionand that Iamaduly Signature: W/8+•.aiQ / ISSUEDATE: 10/22/19 13925 Fenway Boulevard North EXISTING CONDITIONS Of •surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Land Surveyor under Hugo, Minnesota 13 McCain he laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 40361 FILE NO 1888 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 www.ca rlsonmcca i n. tom sa.e wee. lzla41l9 fl,obsleo9l eomlems aooav�awlraa e3alsarweaaralimmame9ss axwn.awa 1 /1 A I cC 10'00 "' I a I II ale ? a4 a4 2 'I >C 1 moi, I11 a4 a4 1\ a4 a4 P - - - - (Abstract roperly) a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 North line of the Northwest I PARCEL 2OESCR/PPON (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. MN53001, with a commitment dale of April 30th, 2019 at 8:00 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Company as issuing quarter Of Section 28, agents Stewart Title Guaranty Company ) Township 31, Range 21 T,ot port Of the North Holt Of the Northwest Ouorter of Section 28, Township 31 North, Range 21 West. Washington County, Mfonesato, described as follows: ✓'' Commencing at the southeast c of said North Half of the Northwest quarter; thence westedy, along the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 1214.10 feet; thence a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 norther! poll with the East line of said North Half of al Northwest thoestr 4 rt,,, 1435 to the ,int of beginning; thence conFf aid norther! arallel with said East line id We, feet Y, p point 9 Y� p thence a teNy parallel with the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 1435 feet, re or less, to the West line of said Section tin thence southerly, along said West line, 438 feet, more or less, to its intersection with a line drawn westerly, parallel with the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter from the point of beginning; thence easterly, along said parallel line, 1433 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. y rebar, marked with RLS 40361 0 UTLOT A " ' " PARCEL I OESCR/PT/ON. (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. MN52807, with a commitment dale of April 2411, 2019 at 8:00 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Company as issuing 16 17 ------- (Abstract Properly) RICELAKERESERVE,gents c E� l 1 own are are are ,4 ,4 . ,4 are are era ,4 ,4 are 3' 4 5 Stewart rue Guaranty company ) OWNER: 'y8g� -st umnl DIAMOND POINT MASTER ASSOC PID:21-031-21-34-0033 ?p f I n allorthwest ca ner of Section 28, Township 31, rRange 21 F- /� T 1 n A I L_ U I I L/ 1 V /� 1 T L 1 S89'43'S1E f I 1437.62 n I A / A I 1 1 1 I�� 7 L) A A I /� F– .1 I '% / V V I V .� I I y I \ n I V \7 L_ 1 \� Tho( art Of the North Holt Of the Northwest 0101ter of Section 28 Townshi 31 North Range 21 West Washin ton Count Minnesota described as follows: Commencingat the Southeast ,oat" at of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence Westerly, along the South line ofsaidNorth Half ofthe Northwest Ouarter, 1214.10 feet thence Northerly, arallel with the East linen of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 884.06 feet fa the point of beginning; thence continuing Northerly, parallel with said East line, 436 feet, more or less, to the North line of said Section 28; thence Westerly, along said North line, 1438 feet, m or less, to the West line of said Section 28: thence Southerly, along said West line. 438 feet, m or less, to its intersection with a line drawn Westerly, parallel with fM1e South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, from the point of beginning; fM1ence Easterly, along said parallel line, 1435 feet, more ar less, to the point of beginning, Washington County, Minnesota. 1 /1 A I cC 10'00 "' I a I II ale ? a4 a4 2 'I >C 1 moi, I11 a4 a4 1\ a4 a4 P - - - - (Abstract roperly) a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 North line of the Northwest I PARCEL 2OESCR/PPON (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. MN53001, with a commitment dale of April 30th, 2019 at 8:00 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Company as issuing quarter Of Section 28, agents Stewart Title Guaranty Company ) Township 31, Range 21 T,ot port Of the North Holt Of the Northwest Ouorter of Section 28, Township 31 North, Range 21 West. Washington County, Mfonesato, described as follows: ✓'' Commencing at the southeast c of said North Half of the Northwest quarter; thence westedy, along the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 1214.10 feet; thence a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 norther! poll with the East line of said North Half of al Northwest thoestr 4 rt,,, 1435 to the ,int of beginning; thence conFf aid norther! arallel with said East line id We, feet Y, p point 9 Y� p thence a teNy parallel with the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 1435 feet, re or less, to the West line of said Section tin thence southerly, along said West line, 438 feet, more or less, to its intersection with a line drawn westerly, parallel with the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter from the point of beginning; thence easterly, along said parallel line, 1433 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. y rebar, marked with RLS 40361 0 UTLOT A " ' " by Kjolhoug Environmental Services 16 17 ------- (Abstract Properly) P - - - - (Abstract roperly) a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 North line of the Northwest I PARCEL 2OESCR/PPON (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. MN53001, with a commitment dale of April 30th, 2019 at 8:00 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Company as issuing quarter Of Section 28, agents Stewart Title Guaranty Company ) Township 31, Range 21 T,ot port Of the North Holt Of the Northwest Ouorter of Section 28, Township 31 North, Range 21 West. Washington County, Mfonesato, described as follows: ✓'' Commencing at the southeast c of said North Half of the Northwest quarter; thence westedy, along the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 1214.10 feet; thence a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 norther! poll with the East line of said North Half of al Northwest thoestr 4 rt,,, 1435 to the ,int of beginning; thence conFf aid norther! arallel with said East line id We, feet Y, p point 9 Y� p thence a teNy parallel with the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 1435 feet, re or less, to the West line of said Section tin thence southerly, along said West line, 438 feet, more or less, to its intersection with a line drawn westerly, parallel with the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter from the point of beginning; thence easterly, along said parallel line, 1433 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. — LL) y rebar, marked with RLS 40361 0 UTLOT A " ' " by Kjolhoug Environmental Services 16 17 ------- (Abstract Properly) CJ Cj Qa c E� l 1 own are are are ,4 ,4 . ,4 are are era ,4 ,4 are 3' 4 5 a/e ±6.06 AC. PROPOSED ZONING PUD 2 3 4 5 6 o \� ° n ___aro' `-�- fIARCEL 1 - 8 Nr � ,8 ci 4 42].60 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel ±orbs described; thence northerly, parallel with the EOst line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 446.40 feet; thence westerly, parallel with the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 104]04 feet; thence southerly, parallel with the East line of said North Half of the Northwest quarter, 446.40 feel to ON (P Sch e Commitment No. MN52809, with a commitment date of April 24th, 2019 at 8.00 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Company as issuing RCE iwart Title Title Guaranty Company) o _ 9 10 =vs _________________'-� PID: 28.031.21.22.0002–_____– 18 L - _ - - _ L - _ SMALLEST LOT ±7,089 S.F. SIDE (HOUSE) 7.5 FT. 1 a9entsLStewart [� r 40 % o ,___--- 3pF -' ----------------=- n o r�-----_ -- Title Commitment No. MN5280 r �_ A I lines and rear at lines unless atnerwise shown an GROSS DENSITY cn � That part of the Northwest North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section 28, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as !allows; Commencing of the outheast cuner o/ the North Half o/ the Northwest Quarter of said Section 28; thence westerly, along the South line of said North Half of the Northwest puarter, 1474.64 feet to the point C' Ohm - I _ a "_ --- aV' aV' ate' aye �I\ /'-�� aV' -`aL' aV' aV' aV' aV' \ a�� a� a� a� a� (Abstract Property) N 'an of beginning; thence northerly, parallel with the East line of sato North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 446.40 feet; thence westerly, parallel with the South line of said North Hali of the Northwest Quarter, 11]2 feet, mo or less, to the West line of said Section 28; thence southerly, along said West line, 446.4 feet, more or less, f, the southwest comer of said North Half QOo I SEE SHEET 48 \ \- -�� 19 of the Northwest Quarter; thencereasterl olon the South line of said North H011 of the Northwest Quarter, 1169 feet, more point o be Y. 9 or less, to the ginning. Cit J ro I----------------- UTLOT — PID: 28.031.21.22.0004 - ___= -- - _------ _-_Title -North Half of the NW 1/4 of Section 11, 28, Township 31, Range 21 (Abstract Properly) r1oW ` � - 1 10 n 1) The field work far this s r y w completed on June 13th, 2019. Pt a as c ® - Denotes Set PK Nail I NN ♦`-'`-- r�C A �N I --�- l W PARCEL 4OESCR/PPON. (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. MN53003, with a commitment dote of April 30th. 2019 at 8:00 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Company as issuing A l N 1 " -_- a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 i I 3w agents Stewart Title Guaranty Company ) — LL) y rebar, marked with RLS 40361 Denotes Wetlands that were delineated PROPOSED by Kjolhoug Environmental Services 16 17 ------- EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: c E� l 1 TOTAL SITE AREA That part of the North Half of the Northwest 0varter of Section 28 (including vacated roadway per Document No. 534561), Township 3/ North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the southeast co ner of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence westerly, along the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 3' 4 5 00 ±6.06 AC. PROPOSED ZONING PUD 2 3 4 5 6 ±27.51 AC. UTILITIES AVAILABLE \� tel\♦ I I 8 OUTLOT B � ,8 ci 4 42].60 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel ±orbs described; thence northerly, parallel with the EOst line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 446.40 feet; thence westerly, parallel with the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 104]04 feet; thence southerly, parallel with the East line of said North Half of the Northwest quarter, 446.40 feel to OUTLOTc ±16.77 Ac. FRONT 30 FT. 9 10 STREET C 7 18 L - _ - - _ L - _ SMALLEST LOT ±7,089 S.F. SIDE (HOUSE) 7.5 FT. 1 LARGEST LOT ±25,967 S.F. SIDE CORNER 25 FT. Z W the South If- of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter; thence easterly, along said south line, 1047.04 feet to the point of beginning. Washington County, Minnesota. being 5 feet in width, and adjoining aide int Tinea, TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS 93 and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way N lines and rear at lines unless atnerwise shown an GROSS DENSITY 1.80 LOTS/AC. this plat. NET DENSITY 3.15 LOTS/AC. 1t ��- 'r` 'r` 12 OWNER: EUGENE & THERESA ZERVAS LIV TRS W (Abstract Property) 'f� 786°rj0 Document Nos. 469541 and 531059 I 0 40 80 160 up c� �� "I I SEE SHEET 48 9 e pa 10 Lin falls! of South line of the \- -�� 19 IN FEET ) 30 I GENERAL NOTES LEGEND ro I----------------- r r r — PID: 28.031.21.22.0004 - ___= -- - _------ _-_Title -North Half of the NW 1/4 of Section 11, 28, Township 31, Range 21 1\ `�♦ I � - 1 10 n 1) The field work far this s r y w completed on June 13th, 2019. Pt a as c ® - Denotes Set PK Nail I 16 ♦`-'`-- 1435.05 l N OUTLOT C T A l N 1 I .) - _ i I are are are 12 are, ` a� _ i I, 2) Bearings assn n are based an the North line of Section 28, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota, 0 - Denotes Washington County Section which is mad to bear S89°43'51"E. Monument, as noted 41r' SEE 1 I SH EET, 1 1`l :21 I n �I / ' 1[� I _,NSt orthern ates Powe Company Easement per Book 142, 203 p 3) Easements for Public Highway per Doc. No's. 489541 and 531059 are be vacated over the porcels being platted. • - Denotes Found Iron Monument 22 4PID: page 15 28.031.21.21.0003 _-_= Line parallel of South line of the 2 1 O - Denotes 5/8 inch Is 14 inch — LL) y rebar, marked with RLS 40361 Denotes Wetlands that were delineated PROPOSED by Kjolhoug Environmental Services 16 17 ------- EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: c E� l 1 TOTAL SITE AREA 2 3' 4 5 6 7 ; ±6.06 AC. PROPOSED ZONING PUD _ -----I _- ±27.51 AC. UTILITIES AVAILABLE FENWAY LAND COMPANY 13925 Fenway Boulevard North Hugo, Minnesota 55038 OUTLOT A I I 8 OUTLOT B C q ♦' L- OUTLOTc ±16.77 Ac. FRONT 30 FT. 9 10 STREET C ±17.97 AC. SIDE (GARAGE) 7.5 FT. 18 L - _ - - _ L - _ SMALLEST LOT ±7,089 S.F. SIDE (HOUSE) 7.5 FT. LARGEST LOT ±25,967 S.F. SIDE CORNER 25 FT. AVERAGE LOT 2 11 being 5 feet in width, and adjoining aide int Tinea, TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS 93 and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way N lines and rear at lines unless atnerwise shown an GROSS DENSITY 1.80 LOTS/AC. this plat. NET DENSITY 3.15 LOTS/AC. ------ (FROM CITY OF HUGO WORKSHEET) 12 OWNER: EUGENE & THERESA ZERVAS LIV TRS PID_28-031_211-21-0004_— \/—I— ---PID-28-031=21-21-0005--- S89°46'27"E �� E sa ement for public highway per - 786°rj0 Document Nos. 469541 and 531059 I 0 40 80 160 up c� �� "I STREET B I ♦� , CEL 2 13 14 '' 15 19 IN FEET ) 30 I ro I----------------- r r r — PID: 28.031.21.22.0004 - ___= -- - _------ _-_Title 12 Easement for public 1 10 n Commitment No. MN53001 16 ry 20 � 7 OUTLOT C T A l N 1 1 -I ,1 6 4 - i I are are are are are are, I u v r7 I I, " 41r' SEE 1 I SH EET, 1 :21 I �I / ' _,NSt orthern ates Powe Company Easement per Book 142, 203 --_��\� /- 22 4PID: page 28.031.21.21.0003 _-_= Line parallel of South line of the 2 1 =06Title 15 14 -North Half of the NW 1/4 of Section 28, Township 31, Range 2 1432.46 IW�,-,T - 1— N3o I /I ri .,f - r --South 1171.92 13 Township 31, Range 211'1 -- -------------- j I 1 12 3 / i- ------------=�— ,\ 17 11 A I �� the North Half of the _,- 1 I A/ / A NW 1/4 of Section 28, 1 24 VV Township 31, Range 21 A N / -1 — SEE SHEET 5 10 5 18 9 e 19 PA EL -, 3so� - W z _� i ,"-'` --- ----' Title PID: 28.031.21.22.0003 - ____- -- ---- Commitment No. MN52809 -' Q _ _ "� = a `z y e Oc, r r r "" r,' r r EET B v 2 J wo g� r Q 20 21 22 ♦♦�- STR v v M �zt 1 •-�\ ma c, - = 32 " r r r r r r -fie 23 V 31 24 �♦. 29 i �i OUTLOT C 3 25 26 27', 28 33 140 Southwest Corner of the North -Half of the NW 1/4 of Section 28, Township 31, Range 21 ` ♦ ♦ `-„/ ♦�- v ' __ _ ___________ -/ A i' - 2216°33 661 ---may I A/ 4 / •• V V I / A `Y V T r r- A I I A/ l 1 1 L_ I V V V / A N89°46'27" W I / `Y NICOLE J &BENOWN�AMIN J LINDEN' PID: 28-031-21-23-0008 — LL) y rebar, marked with RLS 40361 Denotes Wetlands that were delineated PROPOSED by Kjolhoug Environmental Services DRAINAGE AND UTILITYCompany in 2019 SITE DATA EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: I TOTAL SITE AREA ±51.54 AC. EXISTING ZONING FUS • environmental (� Carlson .engineering •surveying C In save wee. lzlaalle 1t,00steool eomlems aooav�ewlr�a esa\sarveaor.limm.meoss TOTAL ROW AREA ±6.06 AC. PROPOSED ZONING PUD 5 TOTAL OUTLOT AREA ±27.51 AC. UTILITIES AVAILABLE FENWAY LAND COMPANY 13925 Fenway Boulevard North Hugo, Minnesota 55038 OUTLOT A ±10.52 AC. PRELIMINARY PLAT INDEX OUTLOT B ±0.22 AC. MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL SETBACK DATA: OUTLOTc ±16.77 Ac. FRONT 30 FT. TOTAL LOT AREA ±17.97 AC. SIDE (GARAGE) 7.5 FT. — --J L - _ - - _ L - _ SMALLEST LOT ±7,089 S.F. SIDE (HOUSE) 7.5 FT. LARGEST LOT ±25,967 S.F. SIDE CORNER 25 FT. AVERAGE LOT ±8,464 S.F. REAR SETBACK 30 FT. being 5 feet in width, and adjoining aide int Tinea, TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS 93 and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way N lines and rear at lines unless atnerwise shown an GROSS DENSITY 1.80 LOTS/AC. this plat. NET DENSITY 3.15 LOTS/AC. BASED ON BUILDABLE AREA OF 29.56 AC. (FROM CITY OF HUGO WORKSHEET) OWNER: T I RUTH M SCHLETTY n �� I �1 OWNER: EUGENE & THERESA ZERVAS LIV TRS PID_28-031_211-21-0004_— \/—I— ---PID-28-031=21-21-0005--- S89°46'27"E �� E sa ement for public highway per - 786°rj0 Document Nos. 469541 and 531059 I 0 40 80 160 1047.04 11 STREET B I 1 IN FEET ) 30 I JSCALE 11highway 12 Easement for public 1 10 n per Document Nos. I� 489541 and 531059 7 8 111 7 ,1 6 4 - I IV 1 5 -- " 41r' SEE SH EET, qi, �`3 man wogPARCEL 4PID: 28.031.21.21.0003 _-_= =06Title Commitment No. MN53003a0UTLOT C IW�,-,T N3o I /I ri .,f - r --South line of the North HalfIof the NW 1/4ofSection 28,---,1214.10 I Township 31, Range 211'1 '1 20 j I 1 M M M M M 1047.04 M / _- 427.60 �'11 Px Southeast Corner of A I �� the North Half of the _,- 1 I A/ / A NW 1/4 of Section 28, 1 VV Township 31, Range 21 A N / -1 — � L_ w�J• I I I rive1 AKE N 1(1 t � ROAD i \J • environmental (� Carlson .engineering •surveying C In save wee. lzlaalle 1t,00steool eomlems aooav�ewlr�a esa\sarveaor.limm.meoss 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 Blaine, MN 55449 Phone: (763)489-7900 Fax: (763)489-7959 www.ca rlsonmcca i n. coin era ��aex.awa I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name Thomas R Balluff, L.S. or report was prepared by me or under my /�9 ,p���� direct supervision and that Iamaduly Signature: W/0+•.•:��/ Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 40361 DRAWN BY: KCM ISSUE DATE: 10/22/19 FILE NO: 1888 Revisions: 1.12/04/19 - Per City Comments FENWAY LAND COMPANY 13925 Fenway Boulevard North Hugo, Minnesota 55038 RICE LAKE RESERVE Hugo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY PLAT INDEX 3 of 13 r- i T I n 17 1 7 a T Cast it n reference monument L_ v I v v YAv/ i \1 1 i � n n l n r L a N8g,56, with mag nail in cap o 20�E r Northwest corner of OWNER: °O �� , ,-Section 28, Township DIAMOND POINT MASTER ASSOC 31, Range 21 PID: 21-031-21-34-0033 S89.43'51"E _ -- 1437.62 �I 40.0 ,w. ,Iw_ ,Iw_ ,lug ,Iw_ ilu_ ilu_ ilu_ ilu_ ilu_ ilu_ 1397.6 33 40 __North line of Section 28, /i I Om I Township 31, Range 21 I [� ¢ -36-+ �_ � -> ❑ H o � 1 ,w. ilc ilc ,il,. ,il,. il� ,v. >v. ,w. ila ila ila >u,. ,u,. ,u,. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,,. ,,. ,,. ,,. ,,. ,,. ,,. ,,. ,r,. CJ 66 I nog II o N 3 ` ` OUTLOT A }458,289 q. ft. \ Drainage and Utility Easement CJ d j il il il il il il il over all of 0atlot A) Y Y il il W I _ i \ 33 40OU7rr O� 232.6-----------------� '�\� > M lL _ 3.6 n 70 1 3 9,67 l7 -- sq, (f. 353.5 62.5 r----- 128.9----- 55.0 55.0 55.0 59.6 _ 51.a ° m °p0 33 40 ±17,881 sq.ft. 2 ;I 3 °I 1 + o 1±7,384 sq.ft.1 ±,,24 sq.ft.1 1 6 °I 1 1±7,465 sq.ft. sq.f_55,, 5 °±7.872 efta % 8M ±7.792 sq.d �\ m m m m Wu 1 I I I I I / ±7,987 sq.ft.- J L-_- I 1 I 1 I I I / / 9 m/ ;18.3 55.0 J L ----I L ---J L I I I I / I / f7.694 sq.RM/�- 55.0 21.5 32.2 I_ _ _ J L _ / / / / Line parallel f South line f 94 0 55.0 52.9 / / / 1O / t7, 359 s fL m/ / __the North 1/2 of the NW 1/4 'O R�22\ C "� o 52.9 J L _ / 9J �l / l / l / l� _55.0 o t / ' of Section 28, Township 31, 5.0 "' j 1435.05 4 ]4,5 /� / / 11sq.ft / / „f / / / / \ \ Range 21 204.9 14 J 6 / / /±7,359 °'�/ / � �-air•---�-__� - - - I'Ts - - - - to - - - - - - - _r7z� - - - =>.� / - /- - rn _ l l - - l 12 Ml 1- - l l l ±7,359 iq.ft. /- 4s 13R=720.0s \�CIO I �`r 013.1 40.2 s.o 14, . .--54.7ED- °5.4 � 15 n/ 5.u� i /o3zw\7 \� . \\ \ / / / \// 1S7,p359 �ql .ft//16 I A n 1 /10 28e SSo 37.765 sq.R Z yJ sovv I v v 45 s�n ,17 sq.:2 \s.o T$EE / \ \z \o 7,166 sq.ft. ±9016 q.ft.4 nI 5 6 L \ <>8 21 1±7,291 s .ft.1 I17.415 q.ft : I7 ±7,826 softe - - I - I ±E,120 sq ft.1 /' nn/ / 5.0� \ 18 -/ ±8,768 s q.ft.9 --o J � / / \ I / 37.937Jsq/ t`// .0 10 Ml \ \n\l±7.359 sqft1 �5'00.7 1056- 0/12 7.359 sqft0 57.2 12 19 53.9 /±7,359 q.fL/ ±10.598 sq.ft. 56.1 13 n °_ 7.359 q.fL/ m/ 55.0- - LL 14 M \ \a <� I fa I II I 55.0 L / / / /±7,359 sq.ft.-/ / il il il il il il il il 1 _ 15 Ml r0 (V D� L / 17,359 sq.ft / o/ / \ mo 0 33 55.0 �/ / 16 I ro l 20 L \ \ / / / / ±7.255 sq.ft./ / 1 / J __ ___30 _-T-__30___ l ±10,007 sq.ft. ' ,w_ ,lu,_ ilc ilc ilc ilc ilc ilc I O UTLO T C ±9,223 sq.ft. /z I 6 - - + - - - o 0.0 o- ge on 337 sq.ft. 55,0��/ //9�1 U o 150.0 0 1 Drains d Utility Easement J 1 I 0 25 50 100 1 over au of o U.t C - ss. - J / ,r, - - - - - - I ( ) 7 L - - - C �t Drainage il il s 64.9 9.8 E- 21 - ana uulity\ SCALE IN FEET) i 34.7 sq. ft. Easement \ i LEGEND / 35.D ----- F-- -- ,So.°_ ' 38.7 38.7 39.5 l r---- � 36. 1 In-r-------� - PK -� r-- 3g2 I �1 wl 2 L_ 1 .5 o° nl 0 i - 1 Denotes set $/( Nail ,a. vu, ,. n. ,u. A'y0 ±7,427 sq,ft. 1 35.1 n 22 `vl i � � � c � 30 30 I ±8,526 sq.ft. � ® - Denotes Washington County Section ��� i 8.4- 17 I � Monument, as noted �__-_- �•� � 1 1 ' L-_--_--_-__��\ ___,_____._ o' $ • - Denotes Found Iran Monument �7 aD`6// /^\\ sSo r------------ NIL__ l __ 149_5--__-J 33 40 I1 ,� O1 - Denol5/8 inch by -44 inch il�- / // \\ \ / / \ I I __ ___-41 rebar, marked with RLS 40361 / \ \ Ian' / / \ 2 1 N r N 1 A / I / \ A / \ \ 15 1 10 14 0/ / Line III of South line off m ±8,155 sq.ft. i I 1 V V y - Denotes Wetlands that were delineated `` I "� \ \`�s ±10,370 sq.ft. I I ±10,370 ic.ft. may/ / / ,r the North 1/2 of the NW I Cr I 23 ------- by Kjolh oug Environmental Services / \Q / / \ 9-- -J 1 `O Com n 2016 i / \ \ / / / \s i 1/4 of Section 28. Township 140.4 A ml ±8,069 sq.ft. Company , \ / / 1432.46 / \ �O / 31, Range 21 ,- _ , RL5 6617 / / e _ - - - - -1 i- - - - -- ------gym. / -- \\--��- / / / -� - ---�- ----- _ N °I L_ 40.2 -_� v T71.92 ry / r -� 16 \ \ J 17 92 / /±8.138 ft.: / / \ Sa m\ -- \� '--Drainage and__, 11 I� 2 ±10,844 sq.ft. \ V x+,60 36.0 �/ / q / / / / \'9 \ 3 1 �1 -Utility Eas ent `�I ^T _ - -em 3890pheasant RidgeDrive NE, Revisions: FENWAY LAND COMPANY (� Carlson Suite 100 I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name Thomas R Balluff, L.S. DRAWN BY: KCM 1.12/04/19 -Per City Comments 4 • environmental Blaine, MN 55449 or report was prepared by me or under my /�9 ,p���� RICE LAKE RESERVE • •engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 dI Ins uperndSuand that I veyorunder my Signature: W/e+• I ISSUE DATE: 10/22/19 13925 Fenway Boulevard North PRELIMINARY PLAT Of •surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 the laws of Minnesota Hugo, Minnesota 13 McCain the la WS of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 40361 FILE NO: 1888 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 www.carlsonmccain.com S.1le. 1-7/0-4/9 r.�,00sleoor samisms oom--d 3dlsun••.1 lir,m•mems o.o. I JL.I j Ij 37.5a,z.2s sq.e:'I 'II _ /gL -7 / I1oPr3"2.7� \ L%�'�37,\359 sq.ft,/ 1 /10 8 za1,M6 L7,765 �/ l / 2 4546 .o / S' 1.0�116 7 (s/ Rq/./f\°t/.t♦ 137.503 qf.l 1 I1 Ij t s-4sq.m w"I 137.0 1 Iiz�ftl I77.416sqft2s. 13 n1 _sS.0 �I h(o'n a - EET\ L.3.�X55,0tl C 138.120 If I9__5.0 71 68 sq.ft. 5,6 L 37,937 10 - so It /i7.3 ^5507-. 01 9.7 ±7,359 sq.ft/ 0/70. /2 � \o/ / \/ �>9 s 19 53.9 56.1 J `� _ 371 359 12 q.ft: �/ i 13 M l ' / i \ / �9.g \ ,9 \ 310,598 sq.ft. \, / / /37.359 sq.ft / / M / / / / / / \ 90 \ I ��/ ±714 5S.0q.ft.� / l 15 /37.359 sq.ft/ 16 0/ i 330.0 55'p� v L _ � / / / 37.255 sq.ft./ / 17 / ' - 30' 7 �- 30 - � i I 20 N ra \\ / 310,007 sq.ft. 3 SS. �/ / / 39,223 sq.ft. / I OUTLOT C �, o-+----�- 3730,337 q.ft. I Drainage and Utility Easement 1_ _ (over all of Outlot C) 641 9 Jg.B ---� F mr I 21 v~_'D e uiicty\ 34.7 N w 38,625 cq.ft. Easement 135.0 \ 38.7 38.7 1 F------- - E- L -- -- 150.0 ----- 3 \ / 9.5 i/ 36. r` 135.1 8.4�--T--------- ° M 22 37.±7,427sq.tt. I_ ____1 30 30 38,526 sq.ft. k°' /� \ // / \ So r------------ 149.5 -J e \\ I to 2 I p4 d� ♦♦� ^m�' // \ \\� 15 I I 14 y / // ^ Line parallel of South line of - 38,155 Iq.ft. lim 1 ______ 310,370 sq.ft. I I 310,370 sq.ft �/ / / / \49 __the North 1/2 of the NW -_J D' rnl I 23 m 1 4 of Section 28, Townsni [40.4 11 / \ S / p 39,069 sq.ft. r--3_1 ,Rangre -211432.46 _ _ - --� r l 140.2UtiliEas em-Qe a }n_t ` RLS 6617 13 ma9e an16 8,157 \10,844 ft 33 �jO 0 2 4 6 1 325�967qft. 3° 11 to" °5z DraYt sm 7 ESte 47.2 47.5 317 L9 310.844 sq.ft. 31,525 sq. ft. \. n \ \ II\ \� 39,953 sq,ft. \a la- o `\, s. ot1 \ ' / / // l0 ' ' I I I 1 1 1 \ P w lam v v v il ♦\ ' =j 8 /�\6 ° SS \ // 39.035 sq.ft. 5 1�� ♦ �� \r / 9 I 1 \ iJ 6 I 1� 37,346 sq.ft. \ ♦ �' // 39,038 sq.ft. of I a \ Ira 6 18 7 m I T n n I ti / /so:° 39, 1 raft. \ /" r7 I ♦ \" 1� 110.385 sq.ft. / / / \�3 �� 1p l I I 38.826 sq.ft. 18,798 soft. g I ; I ♦" \ // / 4, / % /,,o '38�\ J/ ' 19 \ / / 38,724 q.ft °i / 1 1 ��J \ - x \ ham/ / 20 / / '4 L 1\ W Z s I E il il il il il il il il \ // // ±e,a9z sq.ft. // /\ s 6.5 o / ka . `\ 21 / / > \ STREET B - 55A�1 \ \ \ \� v \ � 37,425 sq iN W / / / / ±B, 589 s�ft / / / S7.4 -_312.0 2 1 \ 37,425 sq.ft. \ / \! 51.4 ,32 - w \±7.425 sq.ft. \ / / / / 22 / / / / 44z'`o\ \`30 \\ \ 31 \\ \ 7425 sq.ft.�\\ o o �� 74 \ / / / / 38.644 sq.ft. - 57 537 - \ \ \� ' I \ \ _ rN \ 23 / / / � I---- \ I` 3 3 5 \ 37.425 eaft \ C� ' ?' 1 il il il il il il il il il il il -�•- / / / / 38.521 I,%ft. c� 0UTLOT C -� 2`� / 9/ 24 9 Ll 3730,337 sq.ft. `� / / % /±8,342 sq.ft. / ' I I VK 1 I \ 1 w\\ \ �A o fD \ \\ \ \\ \ O �• Drainage and Utility Easement �� / / / / ^ / I I A I 1� il il il il (0-1 all of outsat il il il il il il il sa / "/ /±a,s�sa5 ftol I � 29 �� 5 -'�- 4 138, 336 q. ft. a 1 1I lis. 26 .al 27 ia.2�s a.l \� \ \ o o > ' -_' q- �'S5' `` 40 se,8� / / / I I _ ±e, 789 sq.ft. I l0 1 1 3 \ N� r ] �, \J 55oa I aW aW aLa aW aW aW ill. illy ill. illy illy ilLL il� il� 136.9 fig.1�� / / rJ i1 11 1\ 1 _5 ' ,,05� /i4 >IYe >IYe mph n 36 A n l /� r- L '1 J I`\\ I I I x''68. n X687 L -J L---_-', r Nim l ilLL ilLL ilLL ilLL ilLL ,a. ,a. ,a. ,a. ,a. ,a. ,a. ilc ilc ilc ila ,ia�.. 137.8 1169.29----_-__--- -__--- --�--J ' -- 66 -------.1 = vF I A / 'I VV I 0 a EU N I r- n I Al 'I / n f1 L_ IV Vv I / `t LEGEND 2216.33 N89"46'27"W OWNER: NICOLE J & BENJAMIN J LINDEN PID: 28-031-21-23-0008 1 oN CJ C� L as Cn CJ Monument, asnoted w zn 3 N o M 33 I JL.I j Ij 37.5a,z.2s sq.e:'I 'II _ /gL -7 / I1oPr3"2.7� \ L%�'�37,\359 sq.ft,/ 1 /10 8 za1,M6 L7,765 �/ l / 2 4546 .o / S' 1.0�116 7 (s/ Rq/./f\°t/.t♦ 137.503 qf.l 1 I1 Ij t s-4sq.m w"I 137.0 1 Iiz�ftl I77.416sqft2s. 13 n1 _sS.0 �I h(o'n a - EET\ L.3.�X55,0tl C 138.120 If I9__5.0 71 68 sq.ft. 5,6 L 37,937 10 - so It /i7.3 ^5507-. 01 9.7 ±7,359 sq.ft/ 0/70. /2 � \o/ / \/ �>9 s 19 53.9 56.1 J `� _ 371 359 12 q.ft: �/ i 13 M l ' / i \ / �9.g \ ,9 \ 310,598 sq.ft. \, / / /37.359 sq.ft / / M / / / / / / \ 90 \ I ��/ ±714 5S.0q.ft.� / l 15 /37.359 sq.ft/ 16 0/ i 330.0 55'p� v L _ � / / / 37.255 sq.ft./ / 17 / ' - 30' 7 �- 30 - � i I 20 N ra \\ / 310,007 sq.ft. 3 SS. �/ / / 39,223 sq.ft. / I OUTLOT C �, o-+----�- 3730,337 q.ft. I Drainage and Utility Easement 1_ _ (over all of Outlot C) 641 9 Jg.B ---� F mr I 21 v~_'D e uiicty\ 34.7 N w 38,625 cq.ft. Easement 135.0 \ 38.7 38.7 1 F------- - E- L -- -- 150.0 ----- 3 \ / 9.5 i/ 36. r` 135.1 8.4�--T--------- ° M 22 37.±7,427sq.tt. I_ ____1 30 30 38,526 sq.ft. k°' /� \ // / \ So r------------ 149.5 -J e \\ I to 2 I p4 d� ♦♦� ^m�' // \ \\� 15 I I 14 y / // ^ Line parallel of South line of - 38,155 Iq.ft. lim 1 ______ 310,370 sq.ft. I I 310,370 sq.ft �/ / / / \49 __the North 1/2 of the NW -_J D' rnl I 23 m 1 4 of Section 28, Townsni [40.4 11 / \ S / p 39,069 sq.ft. r--3_1 ,Rangre -211432.46 _ _ - --� r l 140.2UtiliEas em-Qe a }n_t ` RLS 6617 13 ma9e an16 8,157 \10,844 ft 33 �jO 0 2 4 6 1 325�967qft. 3° 11 to" °5z DraYt sm 7 ESte 47.2 47.5 317 L9 310.844 sq.ft. 31,525 sq. ft. \. n \ \ II\ \� 39,953 sq,ft. \a la- o `\, s. ot1 \ ' / / // l0 ' ' I I I 1 1 1 \ P w lam v v v il ♦\ ' =j 8 /�\6 ° SS \ // 39.035 sq.ft. 5 1�� ♦ �� \r / 9 I 1 \ iJ 6 I 1� 37,346 sq.ft. \ ♦ �' // 39,038 sq.ft. of I a \ Ira 6 18 7 m I T n n I ti / /so:° 39, 1 raft. \ /" r7 I ♦ \" 1� 110.385 sq.ft. / / / \�3 �� 1p l I I 38.826 sq.ft. 18,798 soft. g I ; I ♦" \ // / 4, / % /,,o '38�\ J/ ' 19 \ / / 38,724 q.ft °i / 1 1 ��J \ - x \ ham/ / 20 / / '4 L 1\ W Z s I E il il il il il il il il \ // // ±e,a9z sq.ft. // /\ s 6.5 o / ka . `\ 21 / / > \ STREET B - 55A�1 \ \ \ \� v \ � 37,425 sq iN W / / / / ±B, 589 s�ft / / / S7.4 -_312.0 2 1 \ 37,425 sq.ft. \ / \! 51.4 ,32 - w \±7.425 sq.ft. \ / / / / 22 / / / / 44z'`o\ \`30 \\ \ 31 \\ \ 7425 sq.ft.�\\ o o �� 74 \ / / / / 38.644 sq.ft. - 57 537 - \ \ \� ' I \ \ _ rN \ 23 / / / � I---- \ I` 3 3 5 \ 37.425 eaft \ C� ' ?' 1 il il il il il il il il il il il -�•- / / / / 38.521 I,%ft. c� 0UTLOT C -� 2`� / 9/ 24 9 Ll 3730,337 sq.ft. `� / / % /±8,342 sq.ft. / ' I I VK 1 I \ 1 w\\ \ �A o fD \ \\ \ \\ \ O �• Drainage and Utility Easement �� / / / / ^ / I I A I 1� il il il il (0-1 all of outsat il il il il il il il sa / "/ /±a,s�sa5 ftol I � 29 �� 5 -'�- 4 138, 336 q. ft. a 1 1I lis. 26 .al 27 ia.2�s a.l \� \ \ o o > ' -_' q- �'S5' `` 40 se,8� / / / I I _ ±e, 789 sq.ft. I l0 1 1 3 \ N� r ] �, \J 55oa I aW aW aLa aW aW aW ill. illy ill. illy illy ilLL il� il� 136.9 fig.1�� / / rJ i1 11 1\ 1 _5 ' ,,05� /i4 >IYe >IYe mph n 36 A n l /� r- L '1 J I`\\ I I I x''68. n X687 L -J L---_-', r Nim l ilLL ilLL ilLL ilLL ilLL ,a. ,a. ,a. ,a. ,a. ,a. ,a. ilc ilc ilc ila ,ia�.. 137.8 1169.29----_-__--- -__--- --�--J ' -- 66 -------.1 = vF I A / 'I VV I / n / `f n r TI V i I N I r- n I Al 'I / n f1 L_ IV Vv I / `t LEGEND 2216.33 N89"46'27"W OWNER: NICOLE J & BENJAMIN J LINDEN PID: 28-031-21-23-0008 1 oN ® - Denotes Washington County Section as Monument, asnoted zn 3 O - Denotes 5/8 inch by 14 inch o, I 0 25 50 100 rebor, marked with RLS 40361 a &I jl - Denotes Wetlands that were delineated tl ( SCALE IN FEET) by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company in 2019 KA Carlson •environmental • •engineering •surveying C In sage wee. Iz/avis r.�,00slsool eomisms 000av�ewha�sals•w•aorermm•meoss 3890 pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite , MI Blaine, MN 55449 phone: (763)489-7900 Fax: (763)489-7959 www.ca rlsonmcca n. com o.o.a.a I hereby certify y that this plan, specification Print Name Thomas R Balluff, L.S. orreport wasprepared hameorunder my /�9 ,p� direct supervision and thatiamaduly Signature: W/e+•.a�/ Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 40361 DRAWN BY: KCM ISSUE DATE: 10/22/19 FILE NO: 1888 Revisions: 1.12/04/19 -Per City Comments FENWAY LAND COMPANY 13925 Fenway Boulevard North Hugo, Minnesota 55038 RICE LAKE RESERVE Hugo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY PLAT C 5 Of 13 38.768 I 19 1310598 sq.ft. i\ ;q.ft:14 l % l e o J 55 °_ _y �� LEGEND / /47,359 sq.ft. sq.ft /l3/ \\ \r t. lm31 �o\\ ® - Denotes Set PK N ail 15 - Denotes Wetlands that were delineated 0 25 50 100 1 ±7,359 sq.ft. by Environmental Services6 Company in 2019 55 eq.ft./7,2120 17 310,007 sq.f SCALE IN FEET) 55.0 J ` 39,223 sq.ft. - _ 150.0 T r� -- 55.1' -/ L - - - - anaina9� 64.9 9.8 F ,a " l 21 'd mellr,ty\ 34.7 N I W � I 38,625 sq.ft Ea e t\ 135.0 \ N 50.0 i/] I of 1 16 . q. ,a 37427 sq.ft. 22 1 h _ 30 30 n 38.526 sq.ft. N _ _ _135.1 -8 4- ni r--------- - N�-- 149.5-----J n Im I -----�--/-�- OWNER: OWNER: 2 r NI 1A/ / RUTH M SCHLETTY EUGENE & THERESA ZERVAS LIV TRS rol I I IV VV o PID: 26-031-21-21-0004 I PID: 28-031-21-21-0005 Line parallel of South line of ±8,155 sq.ft. I I the North l/2 of the NW I J 23_______________________________________� __-_-- ______-____ _�_______-__-_-______-___ 1/4 of Section 28, Township 140.4 -- X11 39,069 sq.ft. Easement forpublic highway per 1 j 31, Range 21 L_-- _--� N 1 �i , M S89°4627"E --- Document Nos. 489541, 531059-- M i o°IJ- 140.2 - _� RLS 6617 786.50 RLS 66_7 lin ---Drainage and 1 `169.6------p 346.1 _� 270.8 \ 3 1 _Utility Easement 4 7 A �w1p 1047.04 �- 2385 m STREET B M 36,204eq.ft. 1 w�- - - ---- `--�I- r / r °1'o i R_75o.0 o - w1347 ----� 24 \ \ n ,.i1 /-J 64.2 50.0 56.4 134.0 79? u'�p 3 ±25.967 sq.ft. ; ° \ v - / �' \ 67.2_-, r----1 ---1 r---1 25� -----------, 30 30 i 0 \ - 9e67.2_ r r/,3 ESeie��ri - \ T 1J' /� 417 11x101I I 14 475 -±sass sq.n.-4 - g-"000S� 3? C L---1--_----A2/ 11 ,..° N 11 M 12 M 13 39,953 eq.ft. \o N \ 0--1 l037,471 eq.ft. 37,491 sq.ft. - / 55. X1"10 fN I \ \' .� /- of5 ao - 9 ±8,246 eq,ft.l 1 ±7.842 sq. e. L - - -1-5- - - - - ±7,346 sq.ft\/-5\38,237 sq.fel N37.370 sq.ft.n 7 - -- ±7,590 sq.ft. 38,171 sq.ft. \ /' zsPL---134.0_--J 138,798 sq.ft. \ I \ \ \ L�'7j5 / g5�-1 \ \ \ \ \ \N 7 \ \ \ 110101 J L---J L---J L---J .`y \ 37,425 sq.ft. .1 \ E- - 54.7 54.5 ± c z I s \ \ \ \\ ti 1f \ \L---J 52.2 109.3---------� E'" i \ \ / 54.6 5 \ \ (7,425 sq.ft \ \ `� \ \ � --, 546 n� I �L2 ¢i o f I j _ 6 28 19/ / 0 550' \ \ \ \ \\� \ \ ±7.425 sq.ft� \ 1\I \ 11 i 1''54- '� .� I ±7___37. \ \ \ \ - --j L---- / 2p0 \ \ \ \� 4 \ \ �\ ° r-----76.5 76.5 •10J'\\\ ±7.425 sq.ft. \ I�`l-1'/554�o ' \ \ \ \\ \`1' 3 \ \ \ VV \-55p U i r----------� 7Z, B - /- o a I ,5°- \ \ / \ x±7,425 sq.ft.\ \ \� -i of 17 o E" 72.0 - ° - \ \ \ 2 \ \ \ \ -550 /\ /moi �`\ X14 ±6875 sgJt. 400.0 -___� 55,--1 \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \±7.425 sq.ft.\ \ -% +10. ��\` +Ilz. •`tom ZJ woN V \ \ \ \ 32 v, \ ±7,425 soft. \ \ \ \ , V -550 9p -�- /�' 125.0 I 3�! a3----------J o¢ro 30 \ 31 \\ V7.425 sq. ft.i\ 51.4 51.4 \ cs 5 r--------� '�N 11 ±7,425 s a. \. '>.g .^ o -, 1 l ±6,675 sqjo te \ \ I I 125.0 I I \ .sq.ft. `\ \ 9 m \\ \ \ V 'S ° _ _ -.� o o ,ul wl. wl. wl° wl° ,w. ,w. ,w. .I 1 -------- 0±8336 8653 I 27 0±8.28sq.it.\ 11 I \ \\ ;N \ \ 55� , _� OUTLOT C /��li 19 0 3N3i °M I I ±8,789 sq.ft. I l0 1 \ N� % , .. 1 Iai `^tea 1 1 \ m i ±730,337 sq.ft. wl I 36,675 sq.ft. lin _ ­061 550 8 S Drainage and Utility Easement ^ 250 w I o z (-ger all f -atlat C) r7 I--------J _ >�. - _ 0 1 I --6g51(-- ------ m ss.i --J I --- 9.2 --� - ;a6 / N m II 20 \ 1/ ±8,495 sq.ft. I2 137.8 6wl� wn wl.r---�.� F wl� wl� wl� >u< >u< 1214.10 30 30 I- / __ I -- _------- -�-_-----"'/ /' 1047.04____ Ir _ _ _106.9 ��9a I _ L 481 /Southeast Corn of the No ---- _ _ _ _ 2216.33 147454 � Roadway � North---,/ OWNER: \ -of the line 1/4 of Section 2 1� be acquired---- r 1j /� 1/2 of the NW Comer of Section---'' N89 46 2T W / Casement to sC NICOLE J & BENJAMIN J LINDEN / oc \ PID: 28-037-2/-23-0008 28, Township 31, Range 21 by owner / NVJ • / 28, Township 31, Range 21 r- a / n r- T I r- A I 'Al a i A t 1 - _r1, I L_ 1 / `r V 1 h L7 I y VV I/ `r / /• �1• / 1 ;.r�1r 1 I v / �� 1/1 ✓• 1.// I ell j I / �- I i / C Jo 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Revisions: FENWAY LAND COMPANY e KA Carlson Suite 100 I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name Thomas R Balluff, L.S. DRAWN BY: KCM 1.12/04/19 -Per City Comments 6 •environmental Blaine, (7 55449 orreport was prepared hameorundermy ��'/ RICE LAKE RESERVE • •engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 Lisns Land and Signature: ISSUE DATE: 10/22/19 13925 Fenway Boulevard North PRELIMINARY PLAT Of •surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Land Surveyor under Hugo, Minnesota 13 C In the la Ws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 40361 FILE NO: 1888 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 www.ca rlsonmcca i n. com sage wee. 1111/19 reomisms a°m--d o.o. III I \ B 55' MIN. WETLAND OUTLOT A LJ WETLAND II III 4 h 16 \ 17 EXISTING WELL SHALL BE REMOVE &DISPOSE OF ------------- ------------- I I ` CONNECT TO EX. 12" S LED & CAPPED. DISPOSE OF EXISTING SEPTIC & EXISTING SWIMMING POOL NII ( I z IQ CONCRETE WM W/8"X12" WET SYSTEM. (FIELD LOCATE) POND \'� OUTLOT C IE 924.52 I •li I 1 TAP & 8' G.V. & BOX. 30' FRONT SETBACK CONNECT TO EX. WM STUB W/8" i a / / \ PROPOSED UFT STATION ------------- I •il III e E' ILA _SYSTEM _�_.-________-_ \ a / e/ I'\ / / ______� - _ /� B- EXISTING WELL SHALL BE SEALED & CAPPED. REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXISTING SEPTIC (FIELD LOCATE). ------------ - 5' CONCRETE WETLAND �\ I LIGHT POLE _OUlLol \ /� ELECTRIC BOX i i,l r 111 A r 2 3 4 TELEVISION BOX ® a POWER POLE IE 919.17 IE 919.07 ---- 5 6 7 1 v 5' CONCRETE-,,\ -- -- "- PVC SA :. a- �-am - rc n m------ - STORM SR EVE 8 SIDE \ m�(T� \'\ 1214 tl �I 1. It a f k IE 923.65 _- _._ _-`-~\r\ 15 - - 16 -�-�\ 17 I I� , I II CONNECT TO E%. 1 4" FORCEMAIN \, slue IE 923.25 2 E 923.15 E 21.95 5 IE 21.85 3 4 3p�=goMi�-'T�.\/ g s egc�rNc - IE 19.55 6 7 9 S� \� gig `�� 18 �• III V / 8 10 -' -- e r\� v\ 19 III Ili it I p LI 55' MIN. WIDE LOT LJ WETLAND J PROPOSED 4" PVC FORCEMAIN TO BE BURIED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8' 21 12 :E 92 85 O 13 14 16 \ 17 i Y N ------------- ------------- I CURB ._.__.__._________________- 1 \ NII ( I z IQ CONCRETE OUTLOT C OUTLET CDN S TURE POND \'� OUTLOT C IE 924.52 I •li I 1 P k lIo 30' FRONT SETBACK CONNECT TO EX. WM STUB W/8" i a / / \ PROPOSED UFT STATION ------------- I •il III e E' ILA _SYSTEM _�_.-________-_ & BOX / e/ I'\ / / ______� - _ /� j ' 15 14 16/ -13 �, �� EXISTING WELL SHALL BE SEALED & CAPPED. REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXISTING SEPTIC (FIELD LOCATE). ------------ - 5' CONCRETE 2 --------- GN I I I I I I I I IE 918.44-S SITE PLAN LEGEND 55' MIN. WIDE LOT EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE -------- SETBACK LINE ------------- ------------- I CURB ._.__.__._________________- 1 BITUMINOUS- I I CONCRETE . � I SANITARY SEWER - -------------- - IE 924.52 WATER MAIN -I -----I---------- 'I - 30' FRONT SETBACK STORM SEWER ---------------- �< - R/W WETLAND ------------- 3 8" WATERMAINI PLUG PROVIDE ACCESS TO EXISTI D WAY _ / FENCE ------- �T OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ----------- �\ I LIGHT POLE I \ /� ELECTRIC BOX i i,l TELEPHONE BOX �1+1 LJ IJ ! \ TELEVISION BOX ® a POWER POLE IE 919.17 IE 919.07 ---- IE 921.48-N , 921.38 -SW ` •" -- -- "- PVC SA :. a- �-am - rc n m------ - STORM SR EVE \ --------- GN I I I I I I I I IE 918.44-S FAMILY 55' MIN. WIDE LOT IE 918.34-W i "f I TORM SE'M1ER GARAGE: 7.5 FT. I 8' SANITARY PLUG1 HOUSE:7.5 FT. \---- CORNER: 25 FT. IE 924.52 21 ---------- ---------------------. 30' FRONT SETBACK R/W B f WATERMAI'NI` PLUG EXISTING HOUSE / i TT 3 8" WATERMAINI PLUG PROVIDE ACCESS TO EXISTI D WAY IE 924.41-N IE 924.41-5 22 11'' 8" 6wNITARY PLUG _ I IE 924.31-W IE 921.70 i i,l RE 934.95 23 IE 921.48 -NE a EXISTING DRI WAY t IE 919.17 IE 919.07 ---- IE 921.48-N , 921.38 -SW ` •" -- -- "- PVC SA :. a- �-am - rc n m------ - STORM SR EVE SINGLE FAMILY 55' MIN. WIDE LOT 30' REAR SETBACK SIDE YARD SETBACKS GARAGE: 7.5 FT. BLDG PAD HOUSE:7.5 FT. \---- CORNER: 25 FT. _ -- _ ---------- ---------------------. 30' FRONT SETBACK R/W B f WATERMAI'NI` PLUG EXISTING HOUSE TYPICAL SERVICES SHALL BE: WATER: 1" COPPER TYPE K SEWER: 4" PVC SCH.40 3 STOP TO BE PLACED 10' BEYOND R/W ----- ---jv-� \---- - _ -- _ ---------- ---------------------. B f WATERMAI'NI` PLUG EXISTING HOUSE / i TT I �pST �� Jlli_P --_ - SIDEWALK 4' 24 a4` ' I� zs SIDE 20'R IE 924.00 14 TYO3 4 10 1 15 131 9 12 \ \ LUG p�� A 15 WE 1 60' 7 T IE 922.6 / i I e- IE 824.52 H \ \ 1 9 �I \ 20\ p m+ �m�• 5 16 pl I ( EXI NG DRIVEW Y u \ \F 9Gi' O n I l I EXISTING PUBLIC \ 21 .. 3 ,\ 4 1 7 �� I TURNOUS AIL / I N 4 \ IE 920. 3-E _ wnRrcs BUILDING 22 v� ` B 1 IE 919. 3-N �; / �, I BY 0 ERS l II \ 23 STR 32 2 11111 \ \ 24 --- -- 31 \ 18 l6 k v 30 /' Ij l II OUTLOT C 25 29 WETLAND m o' / ` IE 22.03 28 -_ mj a T`P�' IE 926.05) IE 927.22 I' 8" WATERLIfyN O IE 21.93 j I IE 925.99 ! !' PLUG �� OUTLOT C 19i j IE az7.12 �-� v / -- 26 27 oe+-' A `_--- - ---- / \----_-_ 20'R J (TYPAUG - - - - - - - - - - Ygp _ I _ IE X6:30 ------ / N ---_ -- II I (IN FEET) \ m ENC ARK M"DOT G.detir "l -t Nomad Paw MN6T Remit, \ cGIG smnm N., ! 9 r EI -1w = 9gz3e ET_ MNDOT Neoe Mommt Nomad tim o. gg Sta95087_ EI = 932391 FL -S1° 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I herebycertifythat this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. KrystOfak, P.E. Drawn: KRO ReV151Ons: FEN WAY LAND COMPANY 7 (r� Carlson I Blaine, MN 55449 p p 2/4/19 per Comments •environmental or report was prepared by me or under my P y RICE LAKE RESERVE PRELIMINARY SITE & engineering Phone: (763) 489-7900 direct supervision and that I am a duly Signature: a // Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North Of McCain urveyin9 Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota UTILITY PLAN i ? www.carlsonmccain.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Dale: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 1 J cI LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE — — — i EASEMENT LINE - �B LINE CI_ ------ 1 /-1/ BITUMINOUS E-- 1'- CONCRETE "D —i 1 —, SANITAtY SEWER----->— STQ i M SEWER ----- — >� WATER MAIN --- a DENo,Es N— PRo1ECllon ij Ili j°liI + v j—vv— �v — OVERHEAD UTILITY STORM CATCH BASIN sioCM MANHOLE ® ® -- ®� 0 I� \v—� 1 I /\/l / —I MANHOLE �ro O O HYDRANT Y3' NH GATE VALVE Iia ourLOT n - \ ) TELEVISION BOX o v l�� / V l / 1 (� 1 -7 F� i� V A TELEPHONE Box o UTILITY OL TY PE w OHW - 9 5 �� �� RETAINI I If 'i I coesmucnoN V /� wlnnNo �� _ % I A I V A A\ \ 1/ I I �I NG WALL Illlll _ eNmanee �— — ) \.FENCE X Ifq...... = - - - ....: : -- - - ....._-----`il /\ i > // / \\ 10' CONTOUR / \ �� 2' CONTOUR 103 I 10 '� �\ `\`� — `\ _ —�I I \ I\ `\ �RCWD FLOOD PLAIN —.* .*— '1 I I I \ % /�) " \ I / I I \ J I WETLAND LINE �1os SPOT ELEVATION _'�_ Ii " _ R �0 NO EMERGE Y OVERFLOW p eaa �. r109 I,\'�\\ `\'"': 1 i I ) \— 1 ( 44 x p� \\�� - � `cl oawoo FENCE ..0... - TREE FENCE ®® ®® GRADING LIMITS AAAAAA - PHASE LINE 11i IIo��➢I �v �1 ,• Ir-7 r--- - __ `T�' = I w0 3DB i °w� '`v ��---- 1 vvv v BEELINE Y 1�Y1 solL BORING l y'It" I II1 I � �. I- wo_wo ewo� wo wo ' wo ' � % ;i ' �_ � v �_ ,„; � �• I_ s "�^ I I wo 1nV — - �� ,---��- _- - ��'1,, / % //i/ -_ i V v vV v --- / G las l SII oo a _._c _ai- v•� I 7 ouTLo �I — 1L79 `.L. 77aaoa IT 1100 'BI 1I - , �c %_--�/ OUTLQT Cn9 527.3 - _--- - SHEET Il I , li i _n/ �" 16t 1fi2. A\ z •-� a�� s r d 111r Eql cRo�ownr \V v / L 11' v v /I ------- --t---------------- ------------------ - - - ----- -- -- - ---- - - - ----- 11 u _ Y x� m �� J / 111 V I I I� I'II <\� 7 -_ o ---J z _ 7 - / / - -' ----/ y1 {� a IIII!it1;l'1 1 ----- �-- _�- vhnnrvo nLL, ij� ` li I .-1 ..-.. � � h_ � ss ,_�i, �i 1�4, __ ,Dole sr. moo§ _ _ SHEET 9 V -- 3_--_-____�1 n� - - - --- - - - -- - - - -- rI r � '' ' � � c� �- - Y� 7 x'$ � I —� 12'� 3—__— 3 m .. ' �•� � � m s i ode � _ - 172 al in—=- m C\\ lYp'i W 165,/171,, tom. V\�$/.n.. I I do s' � O ga F !` \ SHEET 10 159 A • My Ilasoc soc soc N I Pcss,i 7RCnowa � I III' I� II �'<- ��, ^_� ,\\` sb� �3 0 �a oma' ` 21\� \\ s I 1 \ v o - � _ ,� � wol �.� - � .�2�0 sol � 13 1aa ' 1 I I t31• � I I II I I f \ �•' \ w; •� ��` ' � .Wa~,° aW.a�° v, ; � s x mss' -' 9 \ ,w° \ Wol t �3 ' ` u , --- --- � P III II v•. sa v a� \ _ ' . �.` d� a a \ W0 9� 39 0= s I,l I A 9 + '� R9 \\\ .�. si��' % �°° ' wO �\ � �-�-� EES e � ,�,� +\` ` -'Wo ` aw° o 931'3 `� z� � •. ��.. �8 � �, I ss? � II��� i�il I O \ \ 5� "� .. .................. ' 7 \'•. o �=w III 11 II I I,I' F W,tnnNo \ \•. ,., � mya I � � i ! �_- �e--,�,- � , W ,,,.o \ t4 � � .../•'.\ � � �� ^ •\�'•., z7 rn 3§ g Iti } i I Ili 'i` � ��\\'• :: c ��6 ' ' �O / c —� — � o s,m tot � •• 140 50 too 200 I '\•_..y-W OUTLOT cx3 \` ; ' ----- CC 3 / V `v I I Il i illy I a,Ex vn N ts� � � �. ' i r ,ba WO i Lamp �s `I I .� W s' � � � .•:%- CP I - I M � / (SNOT s/4D,$)145 j `� 9`¢ _�vri' OUTLOT C (IN FEET) i 1 III jil I IIII �m\ `\�J ' i 152 i v� J V '� '-•'e; ,� ' 151 4 / II I�� = r ;•a` /------__ BENCHMARK I _-- __ _ — a,a ,a,a _932 s V it wl ���5•NN''e ` -- V GRAWL CaNs Uarl — J i ENTRnNc j� \\ CALL BEFO♦E'Y04W ��'V WETLAND FILL SUMMARY V/ / A I V A /� / /� � (y✓e,, ' V IV AREA ` \\ \\ — / / / r7 \ WETLAND FILL: 23,551 S.F. (0.54 Ac.) moi/ / Knowwhat'sbelow. v1 �1 /NOTE: WETLAND REPLACEMENT CREDITS TO BE PURCHASED Call before you dig. IN LIEU OF ONSITE REPLACEMENT. The subsurface utility information shown on this plan is utility Quality Level D. This quality I—el was determined --- rding to theguidelines of CI/ASCE 38-02, entitled "Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I herebycertifythat this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian 1. Krvstofiak, P.E. Drawn: MO Rev1s 4/1 FEN WAY LAND COMPANY (r� Carlson I Blaine, MN 55449 or p e o eci 1.12/4/19 per City Comments 8 environmental eportwaspreparedbym rundermy RICE LAKE RESERVE • •engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and that Iamaduly signature: // Designed: BSK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North GRADING INDEX of McCain 'surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota www. carlsonmccain.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License*: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 13 save Dare. ,z/ea/,9 r.�lobz\a00,-BOzO\a0,s-aooENew\wE c3a\enalneeana\orellm olansaws_naae.awo n1,, on,e NOTES: 1. ACCESS TO EXISTING HOMES AND WELLHOUSE SHALL BE MAINTAIiNED AT ALL TIMES. WETLAND FILL 2. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH SMALL UTILITIES FOR UTIL17 I III 2780 S.F. RELOCATIONS: -✓\ OUTLOT A ( J / GRAVEL 3. CONTACTOR TO COORDINATE WORK ON GOODMEW AVENUE WITH-STREEL� WETLAND \ �( I IA I CONSTRUCTION AND UTILITY CONTRACTOR TO MINIMIZE DISRUPTION TO EXISTING OHW = 922.5 ENTRANCE PROPERTIES. ---� r^"�'s'�� �� J z '•. -926 ------ ��� �T ••• • \\\ • t • ---- " EXISTING SWIMMING '930' Py • • • _ a_e • .. .... • .�-�.-..i.ii�.-.-.• .. ��<• \ 0 25 50\ �00 �� i.. �•�,� POOL TO BE REMOVED \ .-.T, a �e�a. oz .�,.�>zss-J .. - IL�J so--• •-• \ \ �� •i-__ \� FEET \ \\\� yD 934 " "•� a� j�� _r---1 F- ---1 F - - - -- I-�- �\ \\_ �7Tp9y� �_ \ (INi )) �� • " z� �-'zes / 112 6 �� i - :, _ r o �� 1 I I 102 I I I I (nfidd � __ \ \ � - �'�'�"�•�,r, \ \ _ �- � � / .u,� o a �iJ--93� I I 930.5 z03 I ;---1-05 1 7� 1 06�, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ *�- '. cslD smtBENCHMARK\ \ s �r I''_,,, ±� l 930.5 929.5 I 1 1 \ s slemnp<a--� • \ ` \ ' i M DOT GeoEet ped Pa112- u MNDT Reset. / 1 22 5 2& 3; °O / 1I t _ 930.0 930.0 930.0 930 1 �\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ �� ;��•\ \ srvooT c easoa2.wt oe i as' i` D1 g?6 JI 0 �m z 9 M s38pos�c Nao-xso-- 1FWO .5 G 937.3 I aoxso) �s/a oos 9•0 921809 I 9/ 1 V �\• v \ I / _920 s3s J G# 93>.` \ `\ PN 4+60 -J L J L I I � I I \ S \ \ \ \ \ I .. a .. e e • • • . • • • • . . .. .. .. .. _ o.0 / ' • • .. ;za , 112 / /i' �, e1� • ' • • : , I I.• �,� _ , _a+oD �- z.e r s Py / / > SG / / op / 930' ° / pp s W 30 3�5 7 �. e 9 S Q o�_y o �� 114 / r \ \ \ \ �• .\ V.G o 930.0 /- �� �' . , 93G.5 11 II � � ��•••� \ - �� � >.- ons% _� a � � / & h WQ, 9395 / / 1 5\/ \� A v•. v\ 936_\- a °o 6 g�'60 , 9 8.0 / aoxso / / I� aoxso' `aoxso G 937.8 y° \ v' ' c L G 937 rvp 0 '-----� r W0, I aoxso aoxso I I G_ 3 / > � ' ••S l l a0ks Wp i o+ G 0 9� ' I I9 00 - < 4�2 I I L Ia0k6 / l l � >y ss? \�\ / ¢+ 0 \ • 30.0 30.3 l i I I I I szs.e is. c E Llp i__ 186 I 1 929.3 9303 kso"c/ Spry ��l r3\ 's i ��ro t -f.J _i L 1 87 J I I l ZI€ \ �►`L.r 8' BITUMINOl15 TRAIL �} l 1 IrlIIW "+����aia•�,i<<� vs see 185 1 1/ / ?98 93p3, wp / aoksp e 100 YR HWL = 926.3 y� \ \ - w L� 84 92s.'g s wQ 'oxs 8.0/ 1IZq�lND FILL • . • 183 Cp 937. 0116,1 �' �II i�llQ / / \ � /' �"J---------------- ,_ � L�'82 , � ,�T / / 3p.0 9 WQ l l aoXs�Bl / `� � __sss--_ - 4.��• --- Q�Nc��-N's',, �� L CORLGglCi1 FE/y / 93\ s �+ ao • �\ I` 'ted --\z6 ., 5 Mp�f AD Cf / 3p3 °o 3� c> I11 W // \� N ;f _____9ia.s_ 7f G/ / g k6 •S 3 T \ S ?9. m I � . �92s• � I I i eorroM _--�sz3s, y l 8 III 5 ` jg2" 9za za. z m l / / ez L 179 II ILII doll --- i , s3 - ---- �.�� a Iml 8eiiUMrN LJ78 / / / 932 �� 'oma 1 I WETLAND FILL 3s-s l ll l j 1(911 rrm� z I 6804 S_F. _ _ - - \ Rq 1 L i L176 N, • o y _ _ OUTLOT C �� o • � eENcH - s\ 4-s POND 100 J Iia _36.8r- - NWL = 924.5 � �- \ � --- l l l // :• �/ �3s oy 100 YR HWL = 927.3 �• �� �� �r - ----- t tt 161 I � I l � 1 � ,•' \ _- _ 0 930 �t /•••I - I--\ \\ � 9o0• ? - 83p.So FENCE INSTALL /SILT FENCE AFTER GRADING IS I` COME\ \ m.� Imil ll r-74 mNmW figx�v. J l l - - •• II II � III I �� a � � ,160 �x6� na0k6o se / / `v • �, `, `� ; '1 �I -- � I o I ��t I I IaII-§ --- - -- - oy \ 3a' c / // ` '••` J __- __ o «cJ J�• I lg OwJO'•J�• G 9 // i1i- / a III ` ` WETLAND FILL / \`--------- ---- -- - - A -� �+ 0 \ �'' - 16� •• \_60078 S.F. /I73.0 _ v ` � yT � / 398 // TT 1165 I � iL- `,� "< M...�<- ..- "<-� "<- "<- "<- "< ". �,,.c .. -r -� ° � _ c +s s32Q8 // / ''sem > ���- eza_ - ___-� •�, 172 +�% sx x. I II d�� t� ;\ I w `�x\W 1 3s� wy6 / �; ly / 16`6 / ••�•_� � _,_� \ 171 \ s33° � � '\5>� P -P" � o. II I` �.� s / a�ssa. 167X ass �9� 0 v' "0 / / g I 1 168 169� 1 1 S 93 0 I � � I I � s i \ I � � peg. \ �e > •J \ • \ / ao Q / 93p 3 1 9 I I e g30 3 aoxs 0 \ a - � e+D°, , � 6 i W� � II it �'• p�� / / s�s� ��y `� kaoX�� �5 oo ' ' 1 1 t •. o / 9 / / oo r J L` 93>9 1 I K oxso aoxso 93� $ ao� II Is \ \'.• \ 58 \ `Okso j c�,y3 // / �•�^ �� 1I G 937.8 I I!I I I I �. v. �Ln qo _ ? / '�a =y ��� SEE SHEET 10a 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I hereby certify that this Ian, s fcation Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. Drawn: keD Revisions: FE N WAY LAND COMPANY �jCarlson I Blaine, MN 55449 o report fy p peci 1.12/4/19 per City Comments RICE LAKE RESERVE PRELIMINARY GRADING 9 • environmental report was prepared by me or under my • •engineering Phone: (763) 489-7900 direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Signature: /J Designed: Blit 13925 Fenway Boulevard North of McCain •surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota & EROSION CONTROL PLAN W-carlsonmccaln.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 13 ,aye Dare. tz,oaito r:,Ioe:,soot-aozo,soss-eooaview,caa cla,eneineeanR,orenm oianseoss_eaae.ewn ni,, on,� 60-q SEE SHEET 9 / / - 4oxs 7> 7 �3g 0 �G 4oxsp� l 3p.0 /� • I I \ VA \ \ b9�� / / G & l 4oYo� G�,98.3 G�97.8I I3\` so kc `>" /G aoxso - - °I I II d ' W0, I8 WO aox6o aoxso aoxso 8 I I Gn 93 / ' / 3 a 9 • / x S / / aoxso / / \ •: aoxso \ " I X I 930.0oxsoa II I � ----f 929.5 930.5 / , >, \ - „y° / e` ri,GO .. s3 / �'. / / -- 90 •S 1 \ \ IQ s 2 I 192 I - I_ 929. 9303 aoxso" l l 8 / l l �\ °� a S•/� .. 6- / ' / / i/ J..... i 11 Z` ����llEE•y.,� 926 L1� 87�IIT, C 303 +60 \ `t I I III - _ - 6' elrumlNo 186 I I I \ 9,903 r�' / li aoxso' I 939 / / �� �5 �3 3g� .'�� , ' A• 11`SN w - l LaJ s • - - « sea - _ /\ 93 aoxso / G A/ / III I 1 I � TLAND 20 � -•++��+-•-•• zo = 100 YR HWL 926.3 - ``' w . , v.s - 21 84 j l 9298 , w a 938.0 \ oN III 9 '0xso Gp �- 3 Z WE FILL OUTLOT C 3a8s s.F. --- ---__ s3o5 I � � � � 1$2 �8 / 93p gFSTAC' g/ 0 93p.S WO l l aoxso / / C A AV _-.36syy_ TeR C F dd I �yC N 9 C G E9.3+ o \ �- 2s 2x � 0 Rq NO r- / M _ E/�� � i- I i 928 n I / -- 33 � J / 93p ` 10 � � • I - m � �z<- �- 24 [79 �I -'� / --- gz -----yyyyy ,1,79 / � / / s?9:a �3 O � i �; � o A�11 O LL 178 r. WETLAND HILL- Nous illi IC9� / 804 S.F. _---- ----- �- ------ - _ F -�s - - _-- \ TLQT\ C - - \-' :s � 76�` �:�- ",a .• v-t� � - -,j I v OU •• T ,•• O POND 100 -' �y ���• �O x o \ \ I NWL = 924.5 I �II / i ry� ill • • - - ,'\3s 10� YR HWL = 927.3 j j a ee / / ��\ j ' '/ / 9za • / •' �1 m W 0. Lin� 121 � � I '��/,• / I �" , . � 161 I I 16 � `� i � � . - _ _ - �1I I 15 I\ i�/.'•� \ 0 930 � � A / � INSTALL SILT FENCE II I i a V '�•, \ \ 9305 930.S / �Y �� �� AFTER GRADING IS I � / -- ---�•-• COMPLETE ------------- f3= ---------------i 1 --_ -- i --- -- 1- 2 160 :-- -yt -- � G I �� 1� I�14� o,wt�..m.m.a i � �\\\ �Qo o \ ��J L \ // 0 fis°/� / j�4./ //-\ •• ��- 10078 S.F. 929 --------- - �- CIS �- --- - _ c'-r-- --- - - �O°�, / •�\ \ --- ----'' `r$ ° m 12J k- --,I I j 1159\ °.� 1 rc 36.i ` 3 / �3 / r�-i6„ •• -1 \ 1 72 ,tee\ ' '� +go I d� � dy � •� I o 0 0 � I �x � ,p \ !, x�o 9 \� r�--� �--- � 171 933 g) � i , �, ,,, �C. , � 9 \ 1g30• \ � a � 1 H IV 1�•\ ( a / z: • g / 3 167 r I 170 \ 930 s� \ m� w 169 168 ! 1 g3Q�, a i W 5 I � I �I 1 a �, \ \. IL � � Gc s \ i � 6 � 3' \ .. �\ // 3) ° O / 930.3 929.8 I I 929.8 g30 3 wp 3q0 gag 0 \ t,�\> � a•oo / , 1 (n � \\ X36 / 1(G ao Q\ li Wp 83'•` \ �� /� -o�� I °o /'�/_ -\ N ��•• � s a / / s3 � � " � ^ wo I � � 1 aox6� \ 93 \ � � 1 I 1 \ t� . o / / X93 / / y7 r J L 93 Wp Wpm 1 1., g g u G v i • 'm` �0 3� l \ \ 58 <°ks / m / �' \I 11 GKaoxsa aoxso 1 1- 3�• s \ \ .x I �� � I I � I � � V �'.• A 936 9 � / � •'.- J L-- I \\� 57 // / 92gs° �0 / // \ c \ / ' •�.. (sows.-3 / / 9 / y} _,z.00 k I WETLAND 3.00 7 \ \ �'' °O+s: / // ' 3 - 3J o�, g3a G g36o\ \ wp g3� 0 / \ , ° '�'< 0.609 / / gag 5 r \Np g315 141 a I <o S / G aox6° g31 II \ ��,'••:: 155 / / 929• /w, xs° / l o - 936 y3la'r \ p 142, Y $ d 9�e / S •YQ -I - G krj- aoxso' / /Ge I I I I I 1\ 1 931• " \ �b I II OUTLOT C \ v 154 / / 9200 WO I "aoxs I G., 937.5 I 937.5 mG I I g37.5'� 1 1 p 9305 I ��' 'i V / gS ° aox6a ' • �� I II III WATER ELEVATION 1925.5. - �� / // s3 o wp 40, p nQxso WQ w g2g 8 \ 9 4 _ r•��'�' (SHOT 5/2019) 1 1 1 \ \\ \ 153 929 s - WO g3o .. a 145 15•i d < 3 95 , r =art=jam. � � I � � / 9929 0 I 929.5 930.0 930.0 929.5 I I 929 6 11 11 92 \V A N 2 / / 5 I I ) --151 I I 1 1 / 150 149 148 ' I III , \ /•`\ -\J L-- �- 926Anim I IIs II I I I° (IN FEET) BENCHMARK dj- Named I=aei yj` . MNOOT Geodetic Monument NNOi Reset, 1----_-- _ _ d+.- - d G9p Station Na. 94000. Elewtion - 932.30 FT. S-i- Geodetic Monument Named Eagle. GBIa m II Station Na. 95007. Elewtion - 932.39 FT 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I hereb rti that this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. Drawn: keD ReO'a'° FEN WAY LAND COMPANY T)lCarlson I Blaine, MN 55449 ° yce fy p peci 1.12/4/19 per City Comments RICE LAKE RESERVE PRELIMINARY GRADING 10 environmental report was prepared by me or under my • •engineering Phone: (763) 489-7900 direct supervision and [hat 1 am a duly Signature: /J Designed: sJlc 13925 Fenway Boulevard North of McCain •surveying Faz: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota & EROSION CONTROL PLAN www.�rlsonmccain.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 13 sage oare.,z,oait9 r:,ioez,soo,-aozo,soss-eooaview�caa cla�enelneean9,orenmulanseoss_eraae.ewn nl,, on,� yy. SEE SHEET 9 �w� �� _ r J H 0 r 9J < sax cD rn<O �� \ • I I \ /� \I \ \ aW� / I 3a 5 •s �� it � a9 " '�1 36.6— n N oJ.m o �w- 15 o e,� " - �° ; — I i I Exlsn G ROADWAY V w I EASM NT ' r • I PN 2+59 1+00 �_—J �3i0 —I 5.6R G7 ,(].--0O J}• —/—/—\ � ------/ / �/ _ \M' •\M •�+�i4_ v— — •• �a.9•as•.�o�•• W EL e37.70 1 50'C) 50' V.C. ) •••• -- I \\_---// r'M�+— 3 $.sus --•a n ------oe�_35 L -.s 34.Q� 3 4 r f- - - - < ITr' ICA°� a� r 12.i 3 s v.c. � -- r -- ------s•\ va\ g0% \ 50 _ — –1 r 934 – 3 .0 1 1 I 172 /� n vv� •��' •� qs6 0+4 pv` �93a -, I G I I 935.0 m 936.0 �G 1 37.5 � .� om (V .� �€ y v / 3 R \ / 1 1 93 •0 1 aox7a" 4ox7a" ao� a tdni � o vA. ` \ ,�g35.0 1 �,1 4ox74 I I }� rnrn 0 � o 0• i •A -v A G o I I I 1� 1 �Os a 3.zx SOG II 11 SOG 1 SO�i 306 3a.d v J m Jg ' ro r L 4S° G\ " EASMENTW ""r s V) > '� o G'4oX6I° v v 0�2� vv v 133 �w .m I6 y.00 ! -- — .e G Y ° \\ \ G x W� \ \ 0\ `r,I � Nw m5- 0 \ 40 `�" C sa 0 9 \ \ 9 g`• t,1y° \\ VSO 1? \ 31 \ \�' I `N`"N`' \ x Ca •� `� 'vs.'0 s� � � ' \ pG\ \\g3gg�60 \ \\ QVvo 93� 0 \ g/ \\ \ 138 \ Z> 'g/3ms9 °s°X36��,• o 9G3\9 4w9X396g0031;\\o \� \\ \9 \` \ a`oVt,`'�6gO03��\\ \ \ >\V\SggO3�,5o \ \ \ \ gg33, \ \•>/\•\ \ ,•!- �/>�\ �•— •,•-•9•--• -> -- ---• /' ��•�`\ ``930 \ -`� ..f.es./i .'^.... �\. `•\••• •.• r1..$,i 1I fLo 11 of aW ! .............13 14 ............ 141 27 Mon vg 14 ou143 'I z g3 \ V A �� •• i � �� �°' 3 I � � 9 g.8 • a � 145 \ \\— 4-4 •� •'% l) ) n• > r_= =�_ v > OUTLOT C N 25i 5; Cam on � 1 2 r --j"- A �Is- GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ---�\ ENTRANCE 0 25 50 700 (IN FEET) ,arm/ � / BENCHMARK MNDOT Geo .e Monument N— Paul MNDT Reset, z.iiNoO*tceoa•uo 794800, m"uo 9 a 932.38 7. Station No. 9508]. flewtim 932.39 FT. 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I hereb rti that this Ian, s fcation Print Name: Brian J. KrystoflA, P.E. Drawn: keo ReMislons: FEN WAY LAND COMPANY T)Carisqn I Blaine, MN 55449 o rCe p peC1 112/4/19per City Comments RICE LAKE RESERVE PRELIMINARY GRADING 11 •environmental report was prepared by me or under my •engineering Phone: (763) 489-7900 direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Signature: /J Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North of McCain •surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota & EROSION CONTROL PLAN www.carlson mccain.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 13 sage Dare. tz,oai,9 ,:voe:\soot-aozo\soss-9ooaview\caa c3a\eneineean9\orenm oianseoss_eaae.ewn ni,, CIM TURF ESTABLISHMENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL APPLY TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (LATEST EDITION) EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW. TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL OCCUR AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT IN NO CASE MORE THAN 7 DAYS. SEED: MnDOT MIXTURE 25-141 AT 60 POUNDS PER ACRE. DORMANT SEED: SHALL BE APPLIED AT TWICE THE NORMAL RATE AFTER NOVEMBER 1ST. MULCH: TYPE 1 AT 2 TONS PER ACRE (DISK ANCHORED). FERTILIZER: TYPE 1 10-10-10 AT 200 POUNDS PER ACRE. LOT BENCHING DETAIL LOT PROFILE TION DIRECOF FLOW (LOT) STREET PROFILE DIRECTION OF FLOW (STREET) 0.5' 0.5' 0.5' INFRASAFE — 2'x3' DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE AS MANUFACTURED BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS HDPE INSERT BASKETS I SHOWN W/OUT FILTER BAGS MATERIALoR 400 MICRON FILTER BAGS I° REQUIRED INSIDE BASKETS OAF pt 2'x3' HDPE FRAME INSERT EMERGENCY NON -SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL OVERFLOW PORTS COMPACTED BACKFILL - MEETS MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3891.E "STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - FILTER BAG INSERT" - DESIGNED FOR NEENAH R-3067 OR R-3290 SERIES TREE FENCE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE R IIN.) MIN. TYPICAL POND SECTION 4 4 70:7 N.WL 10:1 3 � 3 1 a 1 10 � BOTTOM 0 VARIES--� INFRASAFE — 27" DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE AS MANUFACTURED BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES HDPE INSERT BASKETS SHOWN W/OUT FILTER BAGS 400 MICRON FILTER BAGS REQUIRED INSIDE BASKETS 2X3 HDPE FRAME INSERT .� EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PORTS - MEETS MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3891.F "STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - FILTER BAG INSERT" - DESIGNED FOR NEENAH R -3250-A OR R-3250-1 (MNDOT 801) FRAME CASTING SILT FENCE FILTER FABRIC (36" MAX. HEIGHT) COPOLYMER BARRIER FENCING ANCHOR W/ METAL OPENING IN FABRIC WEAVE < 212 pm ANCHOR W/ METAL o�*�/ (48" HEIGHT) T -POST OR WOOD. V T-POST OR WOOD 2"X2" OR 2'X2" STAKE NOTES TRENCH DIRECTION OF FLOW li III —� III -1 I III i i7111 - o I I, II II UNDISTURBED SOIL UNDISTURBED SOIL 1. TREE FENCING SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 1 F00T PER CALIPER INCH OF TREE DIAMETER FROM TREE(S) THAT IS/ARE TO BE SAVED. 2. ANCHOR POST MAY BE SPACED UP TO 10 FEET APART. 3. SECURELY ATTACH TREE FENCE TO ANCHOR POSTS W/ MINIMUM OF TWO ATTACHMENTS PER POST 4. SEE MNDOT SPECIFICATION 2572. NOTES 1. DIG A 6"X6" TRENCH ALONG THE INTENDED SILT FENCE LINE. 2. DRIVE ALL ANCHOR POSTS INTO THE GROUND AT THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE TRENCH. 3. POSTS SHALL BE SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 6 FEET APART. 4. LAY OUT SILT FENCE ALONG THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE ANCHOR POSTS AND BACK FILL 6'X6" TRENCH. S. SECURELY ATTACH SILT FENCE TO ANCHOR POSTS W/ MINIMUM OF THREE ATTACHMENTS PER POST. 6, SEE MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS 2573 & 3886. SUBGRADE CORRECTION 2'� SELECT BACKFILL J l MATERIAL COMPACTED BACKFILL NON -SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL COMPACTED BACKFILL OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 100 (POND 100) GALVANIZED GRATE (SPLIT) 4'X4" OPENINGS 92).5 48" DIA. FLOW NWL P100 24„R P 924.3 1' MIN. F�Ep 3.s 924.5 2” CP 921.0 0.5' TOPSOIL GRADE FINISHED GRADE EXISTING GRADE \\ // LIMIT OF SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SELECT BACKFILL MATERIALoR OAF GR NON -SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL MAX. COMPACTED BACKFILL 3.0' MAX. 10.0' —1ll�-IF MIN. BOTTOM OF-HNSTABLE MATERIAL 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I herebycertifythat this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. Drawn: KRO Re"Zi°1� FEN WAY LAND COMPANY 1 Z / (r� Carlson I Blaine, MN 55449 p p 2/4/19 per City Comments •environmental or report was prepared by me or under my RICE LAKE RESERVE engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and that Iamaduly Signature: a // Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North DETAILS Of surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota McCain www. carlsonmccain.com the laws ofthe State of Minnesota Dale: 10/22/19 License 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 13 SINGLE FAMILY HOLDOWNS SINGLE FAMILY HOLDOWNS 55' LOTS 55' LOTS WALKOUT NO SCALE RAMBLER It NO SCALE RONT SETBACK) 25' 60' TYPICAL STREET SECTION �30'?CK) ,'x60' I I 60' R/W — 30' B/B (CENTERLINE OFFSET) (FRONT SETFINISHED GRADE GRADING GRADE FINISHED GRADE I O 10• GRADING GRADE I R/W R/W 1n 1n I 1L i 30' 30' - ____ __ _ ___ _ 15' 15' 15' 15' 2g' __- TOPSOIL I r 10' ¢� m I (FACE TO FACE) SLOPE 2% J7:�i!MOUNTABILE d ______ __I�� 0.5' MIN. I — --- TOPSOIL2.5'0.5' TOPSOIL CONCRETE CURB 2.75' I GUTTER 0.5' TOPSOIL TC = CL -.19' MODIFIED RAMBLER MODIFIED WALKOUT *PAVEMENT SECTION NO SCALE NO SCALE 1.5" -TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 30' #60' 2.5" -TYPE SP 12.5 BITUMINOUS NON -WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) ((FRONT SETBACK) 30' *60' 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE (CLASS 5 OR CLASS 7), MNDOT 3138 FINISHED GRADE (FRONT SETBACK) 25' 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW, MNDOT 3149 .n GRADING GRADE I I 12" SUBGRADE EXCAVATION � WoJ2� I *FINAL SECTION TO BE VERIFIED /MATCH EXISTING SECTION I i10' 10 O l` FINISHED GRADE 1 0.5' MIN. 10' TOPSOIL I GRADING GRADE I I � I I I 10'16 I I~ 0.5' MIN. I 2.75' I --- TOPSOIL 0.5' TOPSOIL 2 0.5' TORSO SLAB ON GRADE It NO SCALE It LOOKOUT �30' #74' I NO SCALE (FRONT SETBACK) 1 FINISHED GRADE iSIG GRADING GRADE j i (FRONT SETBACK) 25' * 60' ' : 0.2' TOPSOIL To' �P 0.5 MIN. TOPSOIL FINISHED GRADE GRADING GRADE � I I _______ __ _ _____ 2 1d o 0 0.5' MIN. TOPSOIL .5' 0.5' TOPSOIL �- UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN MODIFIED LOOKOUT NO SCALE 30, *60 :(FRONT SETBACK) 25'� I LO(2) n FINISHED GRADE 10' GRADING GRADE � 1 6 0.5' MIN. '6 -------- TOPSOIL 2.5' GRADING PLAN LOT KEY 0.5' TOPSOIL j STREET 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I herebycertifythat this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. KOstofak, P.E. Drawn: KRO ReV151On' FEN WAY LAND COMPANY 13 / (r� Carlson I Blaine, MN 55449 p r 2/4/19 per City Comments •environmental or report was prepared by me or under my RICE LAKE RESERVE engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and that I am Signature: a // Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North DETAILS Of surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota McCain www.Carlsonmccain.com the laws ofthe State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 13 oIF 59.4----T �_ DRAINAGE & UTILITY BLOCK NUMBER EASEMENT G lJ LOT NUMBER LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION SURFACE DRAINAGE ` HOUSE TYPES I R RAMBLER OR SPLIT ENTRY GROUND ELEVATION 961.0 LO RAMBLER LOOKOUT OR SPLIT 0 BUILDING /961 rJ ENTRY WALKOUT WO —RAMBLER WALKOUT 1 0 2/ SE —SPLIT ENTRY RECOMMENDED SE WO—SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT GARAGE SIDE I CG—CUSTOM GRADING SOC—DENOTES SLAB ON GRADE FINISHED 0 ELEVATION I OT CORNFR L c 1 J �. . DENOTES STEP CONDITION (IN 6- STEPS) j STREET 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I herebycertifythat this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. KOstofak, P.E. Drawn: KRO ReV151On' FEN WAY LAND COMPANY 13 / (r� Carlson I Blaine, MN 55449 p r 2/4/19 per City Comments •environmental or report was prepared by me or under my RICE LAKE RESERVE engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and that I am Signature: a // Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North DETAILS Of surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota McCain www.Carlsonmccain.com the laws ofthe State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 13 KEY DENOTES TREE O TO BE SAVED DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED NOTE: REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT INFORMATION. VICINITY MAP N BENCHMARK 0 50 100 200 t, MNDOT I-- Monument Named Poul MNDT Reset, GIII Station No, 94600. Elevation 9}2.39 IT, 2. MNDOT Geodetic Monument Named Eagle, GSID Staten No. 95067. Elevo— = 932.39 FT. (IN FEET) 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I hereb cer[if that this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. KrystOfak, P.E. Drawn: KRO ReV151Ons: FE N WAY LAND COMPANY T 1 / Carlson Blaine, MN 55449 y y p r 2/4/19 per Cit Comments •environmental or report was prepared by me orundermy P y RICE LAKE RESERVE I :engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and that Iamaduly Signature: Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of Ing, Faz: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota McCain www.(763) carlsonmccain.com the lawsoftheStateofMinnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 / T5 LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB LINE ___________ BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SANITARY SEWER ----->----->— STORM SEWER----->r---->� —»>� WATER MAIN OVERHEAD UTILITY ---^--- R o EcnoN STORM CATCH BASIN STORM MANHOLE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE O MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE D4 TELEVISION BOX ❑ T TELEPHONE BOX ❑ UTILITY POLE `o> RETAINING WALL FENCE x 10' CONTOUR 2' CONTOUR FEMA FLOOD PLAIN WETLAND LINE SPOT ELEVATION _00.0_ E.I.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW • 0 000.0 SILT FENCE .............. TREE FENCE GRADING LIMITS LIMITS TREELINE (YWl'Wl'1 SOIL BORING KEY DENOTES TREE O TO BE SAVED DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED NOTE: REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT INFORMATION. VICINITY MAP N BENCHMARK 0 50 100 200 t, MNDOT I-- Monument Named Poul MNDT Reset, GIII Station No, 94600. Elevation 9}2.39 IT, 2. MNDOT Geodetic Monument Named Eagle, GSID Staten No. 95067. Elevo— = 932.39 FT. (IN FEET) 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I hereb cer[if that this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. KrystOfak, P.E. Drawn: KRO ReV151Ons: FE N WAY LAND COMPANY T 1 / Carlson Blaine, MN 55449 y y p r 2/4/19 per Cit Comments •environmental or report was prepared by me orundermy P y RICE LAKE RESERVE I :engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and that Iamaduly Signature: Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of Ing, Faz: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota McCain www.(763) carlsonmccain.com the lawsoftheStateofMinnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 / T5 OUTLOT A / I GRAVEL S WETLAND I I III CONSTRUCTION / OHW = 922.5 i \ ENTRANCE �I••D 300�_ / / s� •7 l &® I 93 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Rio•. g e_• • • • • • • • • • • Tf'.-.-• �L r C•i?�1 • • RD �996 7'I•Tr \ \ 92a. 934 2 / D,996, 9 .9 \� ---_I ' 1 02103 � _ I ' 106 I `FM 930.5 / I• s3o rt / / 93 930.0 X9.5 930.0 Irl I r 94 sea 938.1 G w W D seg 109 \ \ RDlenr- �� 922 "\ .. ` 6y -938.0 G 937.5 G 937.5 O 930. \ \�I -s` 20] R �3s 937. I ° 92 1 U\ g - � �AVv�T•�� ��zs 29.5 �� \ \ �J 1 1 2 113 -R"��\� \� s A II �•f> I o � � �, >x f ,966 3j WO 3ps 114 R'6' \ \ ' • �_\ �iQ X - 930 \ �cv"• m"°'�` " o ,'� F� M` l q m m m m �° 9 m �-° m RD M >FM m a m h m v - r �- S G � �-�„ >r'.�"� 937.5 G v \ 938 WD M 34 7 �l - 938.0 G ll r \I I \ \ IIS 937.5 G 9350- - - - �FM 5 / D ,gra G 938. 2 V \ \ j I G 938.0 9 G 937.8 G 93 \35.3 ~\ _ / ° G k/II I I Ill � II �I \ I \ r 930.0 WO 29.5 W WO \WO w0 937, 8 83j, 8 G �93p8 g PROPOSED 930.0 9�8 G � 930 92g 8 WO 84 9z9°..3 929.\ 930.0 930.3 929.8 930 3 1 2 1.8 II ----- -9\:0 f 192 191 -1,89 KEY 929.8 930.3 z 9.2 AI)WETLAND 188 1187 86 BITUMINOUS E----] 0 ML0 INDUS 20 CONIFEROUS DECIDUOUS 185 CONCRETE [ ] 0 100 YR HWL = "26.3 0 mm m �a m *no 1765 k DENOTES TREE SANITARY SEWER ----->- ° (I �,'•• TO BE SAVED _--------- STORM SEWER - /0 0 -- WATER MAIN ----- - OVERHEAD UTILITY DENOTES INLET ROTECTIou 1776 ° --••- x E.O.F. BE REMOVED 93�. 8 i- \ Wo G .8 G W O 83j, 8 G �93p8 g PROPOSED Wo 9�8 G � 930 92g 8 wo 84 9z9°..3 UilLiIY POLE 183 / 9z98 1 2 1.8 1 /Wo B 7/ / G -1 _ AFAR S/(T1 P8 T 93p'0 g v Wo o'�.F ram s0 g 23 v°nn I ��------- 9i4.5_g H, •T2s\.\ �+lifP(,�r AD/pG/ 929'3 W ,a D� a a anJ,g a° s1 �, �s2s• orroM � sp35 _ 8 g3p3 179 9zs.e ,e° a o' q 1 / Izl m e• 93L O �° e° a° o �� I• / m l / \ BITptiIlNOUS 178 ZRD 1111z ¢� 1• m N `\\ SAIL \ 1 `.� RD ,e1 01814 °�° °:Fg„ 6 �/ �.�/m �� _---------- OUvT� T C9076 I( TRD 81 RD1182D � / NCH O NWL �• y II I / /�/ •'• •���� s� s� �O�xv 10� YR HWL 927.3 vv�•. ` �� ' I iRD 181'\tN' 1822 D D 0 0 / �• /} / 8 • J \ �\ \ •• N1 �wC �O � 1823 o � /a rs=`naa c � 161 16. ,Rp161INSTALL SILT FENCE I\ ��,• g3p .1 • vv v v Iml � I I I I it �D ,azs � rao ,> rra° s. z Izs -r<D 7 41 sD I g90?, 9`31._5 � \\ \\ AFTER GRADING IS 1z II 1 74 �o i TIRD 17 RD I'll / v COMPLETE 1 ill' I ------- mD,a---"--------- Hca a- t,� --JI-- -- - - 'IT}�T - - \ ----�� u ' 1RD 172 D w J O I I I - - - - - - - - ° '.�R - O. 0 g38 938 0 >A IOU. ^P 1 - - - � .7 ,• QOM - - - _I 1 hRD s,6C °o my ra1706; °�P ° inn �r� / 11 �1 •' 1°� I cv I -- �s7r-------- 73 yyy��gRD �iA+'�__�__�-J S0. ° C • � - i l y. W ^ v 121 �Li�i09 I LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE UilLiIY POLE --. EASEMENT LINE ------ ----- RETAINING WALL KEY N CURB LINE _____= FENCE BITUMINOUS E----] 0 10' CONTOUR CONIFEROUS DECIDUOUS CONCRETE [ ] 0 2' CONTOUR DENOTES TREE SANITARY SEWER ----->- FEMA FLOOD PLAIN WETLAND LINE TO BE SAVED STORM SEWER - DENOTES TREE TO X X WATER MAIN ----- - OVERHEAD UTILITY DENOTES INLET ROTECTIou SPOT ELEVATION -••-- ° --••- x E.O.F. BE REMOVED a = ®® STORMpRMTMA EMERGENCY OVERFLOW �a -0 -0 ppp.p BENCHMARK HAo�E ®® SILT FENCE • • .. • rjQT OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE Q TREE FENCE o 0 o v v .. v REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE 0 25 50 1pp1.MNDOT -IN, N -d P-1 MNDT R -t, MANHOLE Q GRADING LIMITS n IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL EPALCEMENT MIO statio. No. 9aeoo. Dewtlon = 111- IT, DoT c ,U, No.umr.t N -d Ea9I•, OsiD HYDRANT fY uR TREELINE 1 INFORMATION. statio. No. -57. E-- - 93.39 IT. GATE VALVE X (IN FEET) TELEVISION BOX ❑ SOIL BORING TELEPHONE BOX ❑ (r� Carlson environmental 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive Blaine, MN 55449 NE, Suite 100 I herebycertifythat this Ian, specification p p or report was prepared by me or under my Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. Drawn: KRO Re"ibi°ns: 2/4/19 per City Comments FEN WAY LAND COMPANY RICE LAKE RESERVE T2 I Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and thatIamaduly 6ignatDre: a // Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of ° surveying Ing' McCain Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Date: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 Hugo, Minnesota T5 www.Carlsonmccain.com the laws of the State of Minnesota 1111 E51 `TRDffi�Ti a53 r� D 926 Ill BOTTOM --\ \'923.5—� II �[i�RD I O B55 179 929.8 III Q TRD 1.1d TRD SRT �0 0 / II til O '�`O 4i0 P`e a° ° t'+°��n a a�'�'.� 1. imI / \— 891 rud 1pOOs 178 D,en a°..oFO� $, 1•'I I \ I'��— —\— Alt \ 177` wD, RD 1e12 x° n'/ m z I _---_--------- ,\\ �^m D / °' `I D es o4 ti 114••I/ " OUTLgT C _ POND 100 —� •. VIII mD I61% RD 1ezD — y Bob N WL = 924.5 ' I 10YR HAL = 927.3 RD, y '. II I I 7 8244T33 D DD0,822 00� o ���„„„�/LARD t]33j l �/ • 928 • \` \\\ ��\ �\ \•' N1 ����hhhtT�''O 161 1.��— o 3 0 9 I ice• \ �•• • 1 9pI 61 / 0� 930.0 ` INSTALL SILT FENCE I m PI I II I1 I III 11 I— d iRD 18 yy�. TRR12 ----- —--------D-- "Wo- D�6— 1eI ]5 >D5— 11] • 3 HZfifRD 3160 ZERO+ °, f ~ 1]48 ' I i I it -III\ � 1 �➢ 1]1 ,n D 1]00 � IIID. �--------- — -- ,B],----------� �R�] 4 76 q1 RD -- gg 05 93Qg \ \� AFTER GRADING IS II SII �� I C 174 °PLETE �o •' 160- -� - - 913- ------------- w -- M,., O 1.� I 8 O \ �� � R c P O n �pC C Xq�- / I 1 1• � TC 36.1 lj�� 11 �I ���, • �� — 5.6 � III II 11 I�j( �.• I I �I VIII I ^ `t•• � LG��o ' I1�II 1 I \ 58\ s 9 0 'Po 92395 93 � 1'I„ III TrD,7D5, WETLAND m° ^° Dnm I111p11 i 1-1 ••: •. � I I� �I � Ilil I I ��\'••, ��6 I I jI 1� \� •., �1 OUTLOT C III li III WATER ELEVATION ±925.5. I11�� II III I� (SHOT 5/2019) 1 IIIA III !iII LMOD EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE — — — EASEMENT LINE ----- ------ CURB LINE ====== BITUMINOUS E----� 0 CONCRETE e ] 0 SANITARY SEWER ----->— STORM SEWER ----->— >TI:s DRN� WATER MAIN ----- — Owlcr OMS ON OVERHEAD UTILITY STORM CATCH BASIN STORM MANHOLE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE O MANHOLE HYDRANT w GATE VALVE Do TI TELEVISION BOX ❑ TELEPHONE BOX ❑ UTILITY POLE RETAINING WALL FENCE 10' CONTOUR — — — 2' CONTOUR FEMA FLOOD PLAIN WETLAND LINE _oo.o_ SPOT ELEVATION -•a--- . ----s. E.I.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW x 4. 000.0 SILT FENCE • • . • . • - TREEFENCE - GRADING LIMITS - TREELINE iYW� SOIL BORING 92 9 29 924 — 303 `— :__—--e�6.. • •' •'' 1 6 i 171 3 923 1671 926 170 g3ag 92 e 168 169 g2g8 \ g O 933 929.8 929.E g30 w0 g30.3 w V�� 3 930\ WO WO \ s G g38. \ SSa?Do 34.7_ --34.T 34.7 s2g s w0 4 z9 15393 \ 15 2 929. ,\-PeG•�� 151 3'39 KEY CONIFEROUS DECIDUOUS DENOTES TREE TO BE SAVED DENOTES TREE TO X X 11OMNOM REFER REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT INFORMATION. 1 1471 150 1 149 I ' 36.8`D R / J TRD 0 0 ii fl �� ° 121 172 0 �s 93a � G G / Q35 g (9 G 93a? G ,37 a Wo gg0 gg0 9 92g' 45 D 3132 / ME ���X = �. Wo 10 g3 ' 14 3g3; 143 fes. MORD 3136 �M - • Sx OR D / • • s • Q a H j / D 113 D 31 A AR35 / RD 3220 �—�Oo ° RD 3201 RD 319IR D 3,99 I I N BENCHMARK 0 25 50 100 1. MNDOr —,R, Monument N—d Paul MNDT Reset, OSID SlaVm No. 94600. D—IF. = 932.36 FT. MND T Oe—Ue Monument Nametl Eagle. GSID Station No. 95067. Elew— = 932.39 T. (IN FEET) 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 1 herebycertifythat this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. Drawn: KRO ReV151On51 FEN WAY LAND COMPANY T3 (r� Carlson I Blaine, MN 55449 p r 2/4/19 per City Comments •environmental or report was prepared by me or under my RICE LAKE RESERVE engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and that lam Signature: a // Designed: BOK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota McCain www.Carlsonmccain.com the laws ofthe State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 T5 927.3 INSTALL SILT FENCE \ AFTER GRADING IS \ ----COMPLETE EXISTING _ 1 iWOD EXISTING UTILITY POLE RETAINING WALL FENCE 10' CONTOUR — — 2' CONTOUR FEMA FLOOD PLAIN WETLAND LINE CG SPOT ELEVATION -••---- ----a- EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SILT FENCE TREE FENCE GRADING LIMITS TREELINE %1 SOIL BORING ( \l �J PROPOSED �00.0� E.O.F. 000.0 000000 - EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB LINE =____= BITUMINOUS E \\ CONCRETE ROADWAY \ SANITARY SEWER ----->— NT / \ STORM SEWER ----->— p >� WATER MAIN ----- DEROOETCT1 INLET OVERHEAD UTILITY STORM CATCH BASIN 0 ED wJ STORM MANHOLE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE O MANHOLE O HYDRANT 17' NN GATE VALVE Da TELEVISION BOX ❑ TELEPHONE BOX ❑ iWOD EXISTING UTILITY POLE RETAINING WALL FENCE 10' CONTOUR — — 2' CONTOUR FEMA FLOOD PLAIN WETLAND LINE CG SPOT ELEVATION -••---- ----a- EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SILT FENCE TREE FENCE GRADING LIMITS TREELINE %1 SOIL BORING ( \l �J PROPOSED �00.0� E.O.F. 000.0 000000 - GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE KEY N CONIFEROUS DECIDUOUS DENOTES TREE TO BE SAVED DENOTES TREE TO 2 BE REMOVED NOTE BENCHMARK REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE 0 25 so 1pp 1. MNDOT —IN, N—d P -I NNDT R—t, IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT GSD ItaIm No, 9ae00. Dewtlon = 111- IT, INFORMATION. N DoT c ,U, uP�umr�t N—d Ea9i.. GSD Station No. 95087. Demotion = 932.39 FT. (IN FEET) / 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I herebycertifythat this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. Drawn: KRO ReV151O"�' FEN WAY LAND COMPANY T4 / T)McCain Carlson I Blaine, MN 55449 p r 2/4/19 per City Commentsenvironmental or report was prepared by me or under my RICE LAKE RESERVE engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and thatIamaduly Signature:a// Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota www.Carlsonmccain.com the lawsoftheStateofMinnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 T5 \\ EXISTING ROADWAY \ EASM NT / \ p GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE KEY N CONIFEROUS DECIDUOUS DENOTES TREE TO BE SAVED DENOTES TREE TO 2 BE REMOVED NOTE BENCHMARK REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE 0 25 so 1pp 1. MNDOT —IN, N—d P -I NNDT R—t, IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT GSD ItaIm No, 9ae00. Dewtlon = 111- IT, INFORMATION. N DoT c ,U, uP�umr�t N—d Ea9i.. GSD Station No. 95087. Demotion = 932.39 FT. (IN FEET) / 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I herebycertifythat this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. Drawn: KRO ReV151O"�' FEN WAY LAND COMPANY T4 / T)McCain Carlson I Blaine, MN 55449 p r 2/4/19 per City Commentsenvironmental or report was prepared by me or under my RICE LAKE RESERVE engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and thatIamaduly Signature:a// Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota www.Carlsonmccain.com the lawsoftheStateofMinnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 T5 TAGq I SPECIES DBH(ln.)j COMMENTS SAVE REMOVE 1701 Poplar 20 X 1702 Poplar 8 X 1703 Poplar 7 X 1704 Poplar 14 X 1705 Ash 10 X 1706 Poplar 12 X 1707 Poplar 10 X 1708 Poplar 10 X 1709 Poplar 11 X 1710 Poplar 7 X 1711 Poplar 9 X 1712 Poplar 8 X 1713 Poplar 9 X 1714 Poplar 7 X 1715 Ash 16 X 1716 Ash 10 x 1717 Ash 10 x 1718 Ash 12 X 1719 Ash 14 X 1720 Pa er Birch 18 X 1722 Ash 18 X 1723 Elm 9 X 1724 Ash 12 X 1725 Ash 16 x 1726 Ash 18 x 1727 Elm 10 X 1728 Elm 10 X 1729 Ash 18 X 1731 Ash 22 X 1732 Ash 8 X 1733 Ash 6 X 1734 Poplar 10 X 1735 Poplar 8 X 1736 Poplar 16 X 1737 Poplar 14 X 1738 Poplar 9 Dead X 1739 Poplar 7 X 1740 Poplar 14 X 1741 Ash 12 X 1742 Paper Birch 19 X 1743 Ash 6 X 1744 Ash 10 X 1745 Ash 6 X 1746 Paper Birch 8 X 1747 Poplar 10 X 1748 Poplar 8 X 1749 Poplar 10 Dead X 1750 Poplar 8 X 1751 Poplar 8 X 1752 Poplar 7 X 1753 Poplar 10 X 1754 Poplar 9 X 1755 Paper Birch 15 X 1756 Poplar 7 X 1757 Poplar 8 X 1758 Poplar 30 X 1759 Poplar 8 X 1760 Paper Birch 16 X 1761 Ash 12 X 1762 Elm 8 x 1763 Ash 7 X 1764 Ash 8 X 1765 Ash 6 X 1766 Poplar 8 X 1767 Poplar 8 X 1768 Poplar 8 X 1769 Poplar 8 X 1770 Poplar 8 X 1771 Poplar 8 X 1772 Poplar 6 X 1773 Poplar 18 X 1774 Poplar 9 X 1775 Poplar 7 X 1776 Poplar 10 X 1777 Poplar 8 x 1778 Poplar 12 X 1779 Poplar 10 x 1780 Ash 6 X 1781 Ash 16 X 1782 Ash 8 x 1783 Ash 6 X 1784 Ash 7 X 1785 Ash 12 X 1786 Ash 10 X 1787 Ash 10 X 1788 Ash 30 X 1789 Ash 8 X 1790 As 10 x 1791 Ash 8 X TAGq I SPECIES jDBH(ln.)j COMMENTS SAVE REMOVE 1792 Ash 10 X 1793 Ash 8 X 1794 Ash 30 x 1795 Ash 9 X 1796 Ash 22 X 1798 Ash 10 X 1799 Ash 14 X 1800 Ash 8 X 1801 Ash 18 x 1802 Ash 14 X 1803 Ash 7 X 1804 Ash 8 X 1805 Ash 10 X 1806 Ash 10 X 1807 Ash 14 X 1808 Ash 8 X 1809 Ash 6 x 1810 Ash 16 X 1811 Poplar 8 X 1812 Ash 9 X 1813 Ash 6 X 1814 Poplar 11 X 1815 Poplar 8 X 1816 Elm 10 X 1817 Poplar 14 X 1818 Poplar 8 X 1819 Poplar 10 X 1820 Ash 20 X 1821 Ash 9 X 1822 Ash 22 X 1823 Ash 12 X 1824 Ash 24 X 1825 Ash 13 X 1826 Ash 6 X 1827 Poplar 14 X 1828 Poplar 8 X 1829 Ash 8 X 1830 Poplar 8 X 1831 Poplar 8 X 1832 Poplar 7 X 1833 Poplar 6 X 1834 Poplar 6 X 1835 Poplar 18 X 1836 Paper Birch 8 X 1837 Poplar 11 X 1838 Ash 7 X 1839 Poplar 10 X 1840 Poplar 7 X 1841 Ash 7 X 1842 Ash 7 X 1843 Poplar 7 X 1844 Poplar 6 X 1845 Poplar 9 X 1846 Poplar 8 X 1847 Poplar 6 X 1848 Poplar 7 X 1849 Ash 9 X 1850 Poplar 7 X 1851 Ash 8 X 1852 Elm 10 X 1853 Ash 6 X 1854 Ash 24 X 1855 Pa er Birch 6 X 1856 Poplar 8 X 1857 Poplar 12 X 1858 Ash 30 X 1859 Poplar 7 X 1860 Poplar 7 x 1861 Poplar 7 X 1862 Ash 7 X 1863 Ash 8 X 1864 Ash 9 X 1865 Ash 8 X 1866 Poplar 6 X 1867 Ash 12 X 1868 Ash 8 X 1869 Poplar 10 X 10 Poplar 10 X Red Pine Poplar 6 X 1945 Poplar 12 X V1874 Ash 12 X X Poplar 7 X 12 Po lar 7 X Red Pine Po lar 14 x 1949 Poplar 6 X 1878 Poplar 30 X 1879 Spruce 13 X 1880 Red Pine 11 X 1881 Red Pine 9 X TAGq I SPECIES jDBH(ln.)j COMMENTS SAVE REMOVE 1882 Red Pine 10 X X 1883 Red Pine 10 X X 1884 Red Pine 9 X X 1885 Red Pine 10 x X 1886 Red Pine 9 X X 1887 Red Pine 10 X X 1888 Red Pine 8 X X 1889 Red Pine 10 X X 1890 Red Pine 9 x X 1891 Red Pine 10 X X 1892 Red Pine 10 X X 1893 Red Pine 10 X X 1894 Red Pine 8 X X 1895 Ash 10 X X 1896 Poplar 12 X X 1897 Red Pine 10 X X 1898 Red Pine 10 x X 1899 Red Pine 10 X X 1900 Red Pine 13 X X 1901 Red Pine 10 X X 1902 Red Pine 10 X X 1903 Red Pine 9 X X 1904 Red Pine 12 X X 1905 Red Pine 12 X X 1906 Red Pine 10 X X 1907 Red Pine 11 X X 1908 Red Pine 11 X X 1909 Red Pine 9 X X 1910 Red Pine 12 X X 1911 Red Pine 10 Offsite X 1912 Red Pine 11 22 X 1913 Red Pine 11 X X 1914 Red Pine 11 X X 1915 Red Pine 8 X 1916 Red Pine 9 X 1917 Red Pine 8 Offsite X 1918 Red Pine 8 6 X 1919 Red Pine 8 Poplar X 1920 Red Pine 10 3182 X 1921 Red Pine 9 X X 1922 Red Pine 12 X X 1923 Red Pine 11 X 1924 Red Pine 12 30 X 1925 Red Pine 14 White Pine X 1926 Red Pine 13 3187 X 1927 Red Pine 10 X 1928 Red Pine 12 X X 1929 Red Pine 11 X 1930 Red Pine 11 10 X 1931 Maple 24 Poplar X 1932 Red Pine 11 3192 X 1933 Red Pine 11 X X 1934 Red Pine 12 X X 1935 Red Pine 12 X 1936 Red Pine 12 12 X 1937 Red Pine 11 Ash X 1938 Red Pine 9 3197 X 1939 Red Pine 11 X 1940 Spruce 8 X X 1941 Red Pine 12 X 1942 Red Pine 30 12 X 1943 Red Pine 10 Ash X 1944 Red Pine 10 3202 X 1945 Red Pine 9 X 1946 Red Pine 12 X X 1947 Red Pine 12 X 1948 Red Pine 6 10 X 1949 Fir 11 Ash X 1950 Red Pine 12 3207 X 1951 Red Pine 10 X 1952 Red Pine 11 X X 1953 Red Pine 11 X X 1954 Red Pine 11 X X 1955 Red Pine 30 X X 1956 Red Pine 12 x X 1957 Red Pine 6 X X 1958 Red Pine 6 X X 1959 Red Pine 11 x x 1960 Red Pine 9 X X 1961 Red Pine 11 X x 1962 Red Pine 10 X X 1963 Red Pine 30 X X 1964 Red Pine 12 X X 1965 Ash 6 X X 1966 Red Pine 12 X X 1967 Ash 8 x X 1968 Ash 10 X X 1969 Ash 10 x X 1970 Ash 6 X X TAG # SPECIES DBH (In.) COMMENTS SAVE REMOVE 1971 Ash 6 12 X 1972 Ash 7 Spruce X 1973 Ash 9 3152 X 1974 Ash 10 X 1975 Ash 13 X X 1976 Elm 15 X 1977 Ash 15 9 X 1978 Ash 14 Spruce X 1979 Ash 14 X X 1980 White Pine 15 X X 1981 White Pine 8 X X 1982 White Pine 7 X X 1983 White Pine 6 X X 1984 White Pine 14 X X 1985 White Pine 10 X X 1986 White Pine 6 X X 1987 White Pine 6 x X 1988 White Pine 12 X X 1989 White Pine 10 X X 1990 White Pine 14 X X 1991 White Pine 7 X X 1992 White Pine 7 X X 1993 White Pine 8 X X 1994 White Pine 16 X X 1995 White Pine 16 X X 1996 Crababpple 13 X X 1997 Spruce 13 X X 1998 Honey Locust 21 X X 1999 Ash 24 X X 2000 Ash 17 Offsite X 3001 Maple 24 22 X 3002 Ash 63 X X 3003 River Birch 19 X X 3004 Spruce 16 X 3005 Maple 13 X 3006 Maple 16 Offsite X 3007 Oak 20 6 X 3008 Spruce 12 Poplar X 3009 Spruce 14 3182 X 3010 Spruce 7 X X 3011 Spruce 10 X X 3012 Spruce 10 X 3013 Spruce 8 30 X 3014 Spruce 11 White Pine X 3015 Spruce 9 3187 X 3016 Spruce 8 X 3017 Spruce 9 X X 3018 Spruce 8 X 3019 Spruce 8 10 X 3020 Spruce 12 Poplar X 3021 Spruce 8 3192 X 3022 Spruce 7 X X 3024 Spruce 12 X X 3025 Spruce 8 X 3026 S ruce9 9 12 X 3027 Red Pine 30 Ash X 3028 Red Pine 8 3197 X 3029 Spruce 7 X 3030 Red Pine 9 X X 3031 Red Pine 9 X 3032 Red Pine 8 12 X 3033 Spruce 7 Ash X 3034 Spruce 8 3202 X 3035 Spruce 8 X 3036 Spruce 7 X X 3037 Red Pine 12 X 3038 Red Pine 12 10 X 3039 Red Pine 8 Ash X 3040 Red Pine 10 3207 X 3041 Red Pine 9 X 3042 Spruce 7 X X 3043 Spruce 9 X X 3044 Spruce 8 X X 3045 Spruce 10 X X 3046 Spruce 8 x X 3047 Red Pine 9 X X 3048 Spruce 7 X X 3049 Red Pine 7 x X 3050 Spruce 9 X X 3051 Red Pine 8 X X 3052 Spruce 8 X X 3053 Red Pine 30 X X 3054 Spruce 8 X X 3055 Spruce 10 X X 3056 Red Pine 9 X X 3057 Red Pine 8 x X 3058 Spruce 10 X X 3059 Red Pine 9 x X 3060 Red Pine 9 X X TAG p I SPECIES DBH(ln.)j COMMENTS SAVE REMOVE 3061 Spruce 8 12 X 3062 Red Pine 9 Spruce X 3063 Spruce 8 3152 X 3064 Red Pine 9 X 3065 Spruce 9 X X 3066 Red Pine 9 X 3067 Spruce 6 9 X 3068 Red Pine 9 Spruce X 3069 Spruce 8 3157 X 3070 Red Pine 7 X 3071 Spruce 8 X X 3072 Red Pine 9 X 3073 Spruce 9 13 X 3074 Red Pine 9 Poplar X 3075 Spruce 6 3162 X 3076 Red Pine 8 X 3077 Spruce 8 x X 3078 Red Pine 8 Offsite X 3079 Spruce 12 28 X 3080 Red Pine 9 Spruce X 3081 Spruce 6 3167 X 3082 Red Pine 7 X 3083 Spruce 7 X X 3084 Red Pine 9 Offsite X 3085 Spruce 12 21 X 3086 Red Pine 10 Red Pine X 3087 Spruce 7 3172 X 3088 Spruce 6 X 3089 Red Pine 12 x X 3090 Spruce 11 Offsite X 3091 Red Pine 9 22 X 3092 Spruce 7 Spruce X 3093 Red Pine 8 3177 X 3094 Spruce 8 X 3095 Red Pine 10 X 3096 Spruce 7 Offsite X 3097 Red Pine 12 6 X 3098 Spruce 11 Poplar X 3099 Spruce 11 3182 X 3100 Red Pine 10 X X 3101 Spruce 8 X X 3102 Spruce 7 X 3103 Red Pine 8 30 X 3104 Spruce 10 White Pine X 3105 Red Pine 9 3187 X 3106 Spruce 6 X 3107 Spruce 12 X X 3108 Red Pine 13 X 3109 Spruce 15 10 X 3110 Spruce 16 Poplar X 3111 Poplar 9 3192 X 3112 Poplar 8 X 3193 3113 Poplar 12 X X 3114 Poplar 10 X Poplar 9 12 X X 7 Ash X x 11 3197 X E 7 X Ash 9 8 X X 3199 Basswood 7 X 3200 6 12 X 3122 6 Ash X 3123 Poplar 6 3202 X 3124 Poplar 6 X 3125 Black Locust 11 X X 3126 Poplar 5 X 3127 Poplar 7 10 X 3128 Poplar 12 Ash X 3129 Poplar 7 3207 X 3130 Poplar 6 X 3131 Poplar 5 X X 3132 Ash 6 X x 3133 Ash 6 X 3134 Ash 6 X 7 3135 Ash 7 x Ash 3136 Ash 6 X 3213 3137 Ash 6 X 3138 Ash 6 x X 3139 Red Pine 7 X 3140 Red Pine 8 X 10 3141 Red Pine 11 X Ash 3142 Spruce 12 X 3218 3143 Spruce 6 X 3144 Spruce 10 X X 3145 Spruce 8 X 3146 Spruce 7 x 21 3147 Spruce 8 X Spruce 3148 Spruce 6 x 3223 3149 Spruce 12 X TAGp I SPECIES DBH(ln.)j COMMENTS SAVE REMOVE 3150 Spruce 12 X 3151 Spruce 8 X 3152 Spruce 6 X 3153 Spruce 8 X 3154 Spruce s X 3155 Spruce 9 x 3156 Spruce 8 X 3157 Spruce 9 X 3158 Spruce 10 X 3159 Spruce 12 X 3160 Ash 13 X 3161 Poplar 11 X 3162 Red Pine 12 Offsite X 3163 Red Pine 9 Offsite x 3164 Red Pine 9 Offsite X 3165 Poplar 28 Offsite X 3166 Spruce 7 Offsite X 3167 Spruce 7 Offsite X 3168 Spruce 12 Offsite X 3169 Willow 56 Offsite X 3170 Spruce 21 Offsite x 3171 Red Pine 12 Offsite X 3172 Red Pine 13 Offsite X 3173 Spruce 6 Offsite x 3174 Spruce 20 Offsite X 3175 Spruce 22 Offsite X 3176 Spruce 28 Offsite X 3177 Spruce 27 Offsite X 3178 Spruce 14 X 3179 Spruce 12 Offsite X 3180 Poplar 6 X 3181 Poplar 7 X 3182 Poplar 6 X 3183 Poplar 6 X 3184 Poplar 6 X 3185 Scotch Pine 30 X 3186 White Pine 6 X 3187 Poplar 8 X 3188 Poplar 8 Offsite X 3189 Poplar 6 X 3190 Poplar 10 Offsite X 3191 Poplar 10 X 3192 Poplar 9 X 3193 8 X 3194 Ash 8 x 3195 Ash 12 X 3196 Ash 7 x 3197 Ash 8 X 3198 Ash 9 X 3199 Basswood 12 X 3200 Ash 12 X 3201 Ash 8 x 3202 Ash 13 x 3203 Ash 6 X 3204 Hickory 14 X 3205 Hickory 10 x 3206 Ash 7 X 3207 Hickory 9 X 3208 Red Oak 6 X 3209 Ash 30 x 3210 Ash 7 x 3211 Ash 7 X 3212 Ash 6 x 3213 Ash 6 X 3214 Poplar 25 X 3215 Ash 7 x 3216 Hickory 10 x 3217 Ash 6 x 3218 Ash 13 X 3219 Ash 6 X 3220 Ash 31 x 3221 Ash 21 X 3222 Spruce 30 Offsite X 3223 Spruce 11 Offsite x 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I hereb certif that this Ian, s ecincation Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. Drawn: KRO ReV151On,,' FE N WAY LAND COMPANY T5 / Carlson Blaine, MN 55449 y y p p 1.12/4/19 per Cit Comments •environmental or report was prepared by me or under my P y RICE LAKE RESERVE I :engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and thatIamaduly Signature: Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota C In www. carlsonmccam.com the lawsoftheStateofMinnesota Dale: 10/22/19 License#: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 / T5 � 1 1 0 100 - + (\ I G BH 3 WO 1 I I 1 I 100��(WETLAND r VR HWL = 9263 s\ I / \ > OUTLOT C < CE i 4! 0 3 .! 1 �a I 111111111111111111111111111111CITY OF HUGO LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS r Sec. 90-181. - Landscaping. OUTLOT A \ � -- = WETLAND (a) Single-family housing. All yard areas are to be covered with an approved ground cover. Two oversto deciduous shade trees shall be maintained in thefront and o or+w - s2zs ry f Y f each home site. Where five or more trees are planted os part of a development, no -STREET LIGHT (TYP) WHYTH SOD (TYP) BL \ \ more than 20 percent of the trees planted to meet this requirement shall be of the same species. (- � r 104 Ir101 rlo 103 IT I I r I 106 I / T _ W _ I1I 4+ 07 /1108 71 ✓�I, ML W -F / 0 10\/`- Iz 1 110�/`� - { c • L112 IT- Wo k + W_ 1 � WO \ yVp}I� -+.:1i I I I I I I I I --+ -w+0 / / { 1 .+ + ++�� ,.. `-\ tIL++ + •++ \ � F �+ � I / W r C � O \ Fi;Nq-f _ - --dna I+' 8 �+-aiiuniry - L 18-7 L11$PI-I+1.�$5+.+/� � 11\`w '+Wp sf+ a1 �- G 1' 0 n* - J I c 1 / / / L - _ W - , J+-+ IFS++I+ Wo_ / 1, 177 \ ti "I 2 OU TL T C A 1 0 a Ad 1 \ //POND NWL = 924.5 \ + r- --- - -----J 100 YR HWL = 927.3+ ! • r - - - - - -1 Y PLANTING NOTES 1. MINIMUM ONE (1) ADDITIONAL DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREE SHALL BE PROVIDED BV BUILDER ON EACH LOT. 2. ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK" ANSI -Z60 LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIALS. 3. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER INSTALLATION. 4. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED TO THE DRIP LINE FROM ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, STORAGE OF MATERIALS ETC. WITH 4' HT. ORANGE PLASTIC SAFETY FENCING ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS 6' O.C. MAXIMUM SPACING. 6. ALL PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES, SHAPES OF BEDS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING BEDS AT SPACING SHOWN AND ADJUSTED TO CONFORM TO THE EXACT CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL APPROVE THE STAKING LOCATION OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 7. ALL PLANTING AREAS MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCHED AS SPECIFIED. 8. MULCH: SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, CLEAN AND FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL, IN ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS AND FOR TREES, UNLESS INDICATED AS ROCK MULCH ON DRAWINGS. SUBMIT SAMPLE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO DELIVERY ON-SITE FOR APPROVAL. DELIVER MULCH ON DAY OF INSTALLATION. USE 4" FOR SHRUB BEDS, AND 3" FOR PERENNIAL/GROUND COVER BEDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED. 9. PLACE LANDSCAPE FILTER FABRIC UNDER ALL MULCHED AREAS. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE 100% INTERWOVEN 5.1oz NEEDLE PUNCHED POLYPROPYLENE FABRIC MANUFACTURED BY DEWITT. USE PRO 5 "WEED BARRIER• OR APPROVED EQUAL. 10. PLACE EDGING BETWEEN ALL PLANTING/ROCK BEDS AND TURF. EDGING SHALL BE POLY. 11. THE PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST. THE SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANTING NOTES AND GENERAL NOTES. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON THE PLAN. VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND. 13. LONG-TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON-SITE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS, PLANTERS AND BUILDINGS CLEAN NOT MAINTAINED IN THIS MANNER WILL BE REJECTED. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES SHALL BE REPAVED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK. 16. LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES, WITH THE OWNER FOR PROPRIETARY UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454-0002 (TWIN CITIES METRO AREA) OR 800-252-1166 (GREATER MINNESOTA) 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF ANY DAMAGES TO SAME. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FACILITATE PLANT RELOCATION. 17. USE ANP -DESICCANT (WILTPRUF OR APPROVED EQUAL) ON DECIDUOUS PLANTS MOVED IN LEAF AND FOR EVERGREENS MOVED ANYTIME. APPLY AS PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTION. ALL EVERGREENS SHALL BE SPRAYED IN THE LATE FALL FOR WINTER PROTECTION DURING WARRANTY PERIOD. 18. PLANTING SOIL FOR TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS: FERTILE FRIABLE LOAM CONTAINING A LIBERAL AMOUNT OF HUMUS AND CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING VIGOROUS PLANT GROWTH. IT SHALL COMPLY WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3877 TYPE B SELECT TOPSOIL. MIXTURE SHALL BE FREE FROM HARDPACK SUBSOIL STONES CHEMICALS NOXIOUS WEEDS ETC. SOIL MIXTURE SHALL HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.1 AND 7.5 AND 10-0-10 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF 3 POUNDS PER CUBIC YARD. IN PLANTING BEDS INCORPORATE THIS MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BED BY ROTOTILLING IT INTO THE TOP 12" OF SOIL. 19. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR TWO COMPLETE GROWING SEASON (APRIL 1 - NOVEMBER 1) UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER THE FULL COST OF REPLACEMENT INCLUDING LABOR AND PLANTS. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNED DELIVERY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BEGINNING PLANT INSTALLATION. 21. SEASONS/TIME OF PLANTING AND SEEDING: NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR MAY ELECT TO PLANT IN OFF-SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HIS/HER RISK. DECIDUOUS POTTED PLANTS: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21 - 11/1 DECIDUOUS /B&B: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21 - 11/1 EVERGREEN POTTED PLANTS: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21-11/1 EVERGREEN B&B: 4/1 - 5/1; 9/21 TURF/LAWN SEEDING: 4/1 - 6/1; 7/20 - 9/20 NATIVE MIH SEEDING: 4/1 - 7/20; 9/20-10/20 22. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION OF THE WORK IS INPLACE. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF THE PLANTS IS COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE, AND PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WATERING, CULTIVATING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS, RE -SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE TREES PLUMB THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 23. ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOLIATES (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED WITH MATERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES, QUANTITY, AND SIZE AND MEETING ALL LANDSCAPE LEGEND SPECIFICATIONS. 24. WATERING: MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS ONCE A WEEK. IN EXTREMELY HOT, DRY WEATHER, WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF HEAT STRESS SUCH AS WILTING LEAVES. CHECK MOISTURE UNDER MULCH PRIOR TO WATERING TO DETERMINE NEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER. 25. CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WRITING A FINAL ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION. 26. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE TURF SEEDED, ARE TO RECEIVE 4" TOP SOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. 27. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO RECEIVE NATIVE WETLAND SEEDED, ARE TO RECEIVE ENGINEERED SOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. EASMNT 0 a 1 I 174 t 1 2 M RHL � BL 10 _I''il - 1• L_ " __ _ J STREET B �O164////\\ - e' / v 173 +aa\ �� 164//\�15 Iul �._ V A� - .+-+� i rr^. I '�A 12 �a V� PLAN 20 \�O - -_ //� �-p �• � � +�- 159 � N 172 � � I -- G I e' 2 -PLY NYLON STRAPS - / / + 169 0 +++ 0 G 'I) G G c 1 0 DOUBLE STRAND 12 GAUGE WIRE / 167(, SO / 0 - V A - g0 III EXISTING RonowA N4 TREE WRAP V -�.�F' A A\ w I +• ' ++++ +pG A i + ++- -- o EAS�ENT PAINTED FLUORESCENT ORANGE \ �'� / w / 1 I +I 1 68 V V A V A' A =� �+ �\ 2i d 136-� 32 131 12 WHITE FLAGGING (TTP.) � c \ W H 0 \ + �- 9aa- - + -_ _+ 0 l l 4 INCHES HARDWOOD MULCH X158 / 3 / " � � 1 G 1 � n +,+ + ��. \ ��� + � \ 135 L 1 +•+ � � - 7-' .'gyp 3 EEL TEED O�` +r 'CREED O + c V A W� 1 1 _ - � s++++ ++++ + + ++ + - 12 +� - ++ +_ ' \ t ,..i_ ++_ A w V A V A I _ �8 O + 4 INCH DEEP SAUCER t1 _ .Z e• biEEL TEE POST- BACKFILLMIx } / O �� � 0 A A V 139 ++++1 UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL MONUMENT SIGN LOCATION j+1- 1 15� // �+ - + - ti i GRAVEL 1 CONSTRUCTION 1 F (46, MID 1-1/2` WIDE STRAP (TYP) ENTRANCE WO - q VF FVq 30 _ 7 N BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, OF USED), INTACT. SIZE BACKFILL WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE UTLOT B TOP OF ROOTBALL, WATER PLANT. REMOVE STAKING TO INSURE TOP 1/3 NOTE: SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. 14 WATER ELEVATION 1925.5. ORIENTATION OF GUY 1 12 NES AND STAKES \ � 1 1 0 100 - + (\ I G BH 3 WO 1 I I 1 I 100��(WETLAND r VR HWL = 9263 s\ I / \ > OUTLOT C < CE i 4! 0 3 .! 1 �a I 111111111111111111111111111111CITY OF HUGO LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS r Sec. 90-181. - Landscaping. OUTLOT A \ � -- = WETLAND (a) Single-family housing. All yard areas are to be covered with an approved ground cover. Two oversto deciduous shade trees shall be maintained in thefront and o or+w - s2zs ry f Y f each home site. Where five or more trees are planted os part of a development, no -STREET LIGHT (TYP) WHYTH SOD (TYP) BL \ \ more than 20 percent of the trees planted to meet this requirement shall be of the same species. (- � r 104 Ir101 rlo 103 IT I I r I 106 I / T _ W _ I1I 4+ 07 /1108 71 ✓�I, ML W -F / 0 10\/`- Iz 1 110�/`� - { c • L112 IT- Wo k + W_ 1 � WO \ yVp}I� -+.:1i I I I I I I I I --+ -w+0 / / { 1 .+ + ++�� ,.. `-\ tIL++ + •++ \ � F �+ � I / W r C � O \ Fi;Nq-f _ - --dna I+' 8 �+-aiiuniry - L 18-7 L11$PI-I+1.�$5+.+/� � 11\`w '+Wp sf+ a1 �- G 1' 0 n* - J I c 1 / / / L - _ W - , J+-+ IFS++I+ Wo_ / 1, 177 \ ti "I 2 OU TL T C A 1 0 a Ad 1 \ //POND NWL = 924.5 \ + r- --- - -----J 100 YR HWL = 927.3+ ! • r - - - - - -1 Y PLANTING NOTES 1. MINIMUM ONE (1) ADDITIONAL DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREE SHALL BE PROVIDED BV BUILDER ON EACH LOT. 2. ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK" ANSI -Z60 LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIALS. 3. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER INSTALLATION. 4. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED TO THE DRIP LINE FROM ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, STORAGE OF MATERIALS ETC. WITH 4' HT. ORANGE PLASTIC SAFETY FENCING ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS 6' O.C. MAXIMUM SPACING. 6. ALL PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES, SHAPES OF BEDS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING BEDS AT SPACING SHOWN AND ADJUSTED TO CONFORM TO THE EXACT CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL APPROVE THE STAKING LOCATION OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 7. ALL PLANTING AREAS MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCHED AS SPECIFIED. 8. MULCH: SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, CLEAN AND FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL, IN ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS AND FOR TREES, UNLESS INDICATED AS ROCK MULCH ON DRAWINGS. SUBMIT SAMPLE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO DELIVERY ON-SITE FOR APPROVAL. DELIVER MULCH ON DAY OF INSTALLATION. USE 4" FOR SHRUB BEDS, AND 3" FOR PERENNIAL/GROUND COVER BEDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED. 9. PLACE LANDSCAPE FILTER FABRIC UNDER ALL MULCHED AREAS. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE 100% INTERWOVEN 5.1oz NEEDLE PUNCHED POLYPROPYLENE FABRIC MANUFACTURED BY DEWITT. USE PRO 5 "WEED BARRIER• OR APPROVED EQUAL. 10. PLACE EDGING BETWEEN ALL PLANTING/ROCK BEDS AND TURF. EDGING SHALL BE POLY. 11. THE PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST. THE SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANTING NOTES AND GENERAL NOTES. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON THE PLAN. VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND. 13. LONG-TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON-SITE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS, PLANTERS AND BUILDINGS CLEAN NOT MAINTAINED IN THIS MANNER WILL BE REJECTED. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES SHALL BE REPAVED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK. 16. LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES, WITH THE OWNER FOR PROPRIETARY UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454-0002 (TWIN CITIES METRO AREA) OR 800-252-1166 (GREATER MINNESOTA) 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF ANY DAMAGES TO SAME. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FACILITATE PLANT RELOCATION. 17. USE ANP -DESICCANT (WILTPRUF OR APPROVED EQUAL) ON DECIDUOUS PLANTS MOVED IN LEAF AND FOR EVERGREENS MOVED ANYTIME. APPLY AS PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTION. ALL EVERGREENS SHALL BE SPRAYED IN THE LATE FALL FOR WINTER PROTECTION DURING WARRANTY PERIOD. 18. PLANTING SOIL FOR TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS: FERTILE FRIABLE LOAM CONTAINING A LIBERAL AMOUNT OF HUMUS AND CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING VIGOROUS PLANT GROWTH. IT SHALL COMPLY WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3877 TYPE B SELECT TOPSOIL. MIXTURE SHALL BE FREE FROM HARDPACK SUBSOIL STONES CHEMICALS NOXIOUS WEEDS ETC. SOIL MIXTURE SHALL HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.1 AND 7.5 AND 10-0-10 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF 3 POUNDS PER CUBIC YARD. IN PLANTING BEDS INCORPORATE THIS MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BED BY ROTOTILLING IT INTO THE TOP 12" OF SOIL. 19. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR TWO COMPLETE GROWING SEASON (APRIL 1 - NOVEMBER 1) UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER THE FULL COST OF REPLACEMENT INCLUDING LABOR AND PLANTS. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNED DELIVERY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BEGINNING PLANT INSTALLATION. 21. SEASONS/TIME OF PLANTING AND SEEDING: NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR MAY ELECT TO PLANT IN OFF-SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HIS/HER RISK. DECIDUOUS POTTED PLANTS: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21 - 11/1 DECIDUOUS /B&B: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21 - 11/1 EVERGREEN POTTED PLANTS: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21-11/1 EVERGREEN B&B: 4/1 - 5/1; 9/21 TURF/LAWN SEEDING: 4/1 - 6/1; 7/20 - 9/20 NATIVE MIH SEEDING: 4/1 - 7/20; 9/20-10/20 22. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION OF THE WORK IS INPLACE. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF THE PLANTS IS COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE, AND PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WATERING, CULTIVATING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS, RE -SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE TREES PLUMB THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 23. ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOLIATES (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED WITH MATERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES, QUANTITY, AND SIZE AND MEETING ALL LANDSCAPE LEGEND SPECIFICATIONS. 24. WATERING: MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS ONCE A WEEK. IN EXTREMELY HOT, DRY WEATHER, WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF HEAT STRESS SUCH AS WILTING LEAVES. CHECK MOISTURE UNDER MULCH PRIOR TO WATERING TO DETERMINE NEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER. 25. CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WRITING A FINAL ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION. 26. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE TURF SEEDED, ARE TO RECEIVE 4" TOP SOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. 27. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO RECEIVE NATIVE WETLAND SEEDED, ARE TO RECEIVE ENGINEERED SOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. EASMNT 0 a 1 I 174 t 1 2 M RHL � BL 10 _I''il - 1• L_ " __ _ J STREET B �O164////\\ - e' / v 173 +aa\ �� 164//\�15 Iul �._ V A� - .+-+� i rr^. I '�A 12 �a V� PLAN 20 \�O - -_ //� �-p �• � � +�- 159 � N 172 � � I -- G I e' 2 -PLY NYLON STRAPS - / / + 169 0 +++ 0 G 'I) G G c 1 0 DOUBLE STRAND 12 GAUGE WIRE / 167(, SO / 0 - V A - g0 III EXISTING RonowA N4 TREE WRAP V -�.�F' A A\ w I +• ' ++++ +pG A i + ++- -- o EAS�ENT PAINTED FLUORESCENT ORANGE \ �'� / w / 1 I +I 1 68 V V A V A' A =� �+ �\ 2i d 136-� 32 131 12 WHITE FLAGGING (TTP.) � c \ W H 0 \ + �- 9aa- - + -_ _+ 0 l l 4 INCHES HARDWOOD MULCH X158 / 3 / " � � 1 G 1 � n +,+ + ��. \ ��� + � \ 135 L 1 +•+ � � - 7-' .'gyp 3 EEL TEED O�` +r 'CREED O + c V A W� 1 1 _ - � s++++ ++++ + + ++ + - 12 +� - ++ +_ ' \ t ,..i_ ++_ A w V A V A I _ �8 O + 4 INCH DEEP SAUCER t1 _ .Z e• biEEL TEE POST- BACKFILLMIx } / O �� � 0 A A V 139 ++++1 NOT PAINT CUTS. UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL RM j+1- 1 15� // �+ - + - STREET LIGHT TYP. _ INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR (46, MID 1-1/2` WIDE STRAP (TYP) REMOVE BURLAP 4 ROPE FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL 7 30 ROLLED STEEL POSTS (MNDOT 346,1) 4. PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITH BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, OF USED), INTACT. SIZE BACKFILL WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE COORDINATE TOP OF ROOTBALL, WATER PLANT. REMOVE STAKING TO INSURE TOP 1/3 NOTE: SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. 14 WATER ELEVATION 1925.5. ORIENTATION OF GUY HORIZONTAL RINGS, WHICHEVER IS GREATE 12 NES AND STAKES REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM TOP 2.5" Cal. (SHOT 5/2019) ��'I /1_.�- WO WO WO V A A +�_+145\ DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL 2.5" Cal. 153 /// / d I b. WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL L� No o scMs FLAGGING- ONE PER WIRE 152 / -1-1_ 46� 5 FNLCH (-EWSTING GRADE SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SATURATE i 15 MINIMUM 1/2 WIDTH OF ROOT BALL ROOT BALL AND PLANTING HOLE. seed PLANTING SOL MMURE (SEE SPEC.) E. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 46 HOURS OF Y it 150 149 I 1 48 4-;' 1 I. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE iUNDISTURBED OR STABILIZED MOISTURE 15 EXCES&VE. \ J L - - J L - L TREE PLANTING DETAIL. NOTE ourr ASSEMBLY OPTIONAL BUT PRIOR TO PLANTING *_CONIFEROUS ,ar T4 2. _ _ - '� WQ 2. TRIM OUT DEAD WOOD AND WEAK AND/OR DEFORMED TWIGS, DO NOT CUT A LEADER, DO CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL REINFOR MAINTAINING TREE IN A PLUMB PONTION FOR THE Seeding Rate 330 Ib/ac \. 5 NOT PAINT CUTS. DURATION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOL GUY ASSEMBLY- Ib" OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED BACKFILL SOL POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR (46, MID 1-1/2` WIDE STRAP (TYP) UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE. DOUBLE STRAND 1 a GA WIRE, 2-l" 30 ROLLED STEEL POSTS (MNDOT 346,1) 4. PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITH b ISO' O.C. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM) BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, OF USED), INTACT. SIZE BACKFILL WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE COORDINATE TOP OF ROOTBALL, WATER PLANT. REMOVE STAKING TO INSURE TOP 1/3 12 UNIFORM OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO ORIENTATION OF GUY HORIZONTAL RINGS, WHICHEVER IS GREATE 12 NES AND STAKES REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM TOP 2.5" Cal. B&B I/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. STAKING DIAGRAM 5. PWMBAND BACKFILL WITH Boulevard Linden 2.5" Cal. BACKFILL SOL CONIFEROUS TREES GUY WIRE WITH WEBBING b. WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL BOTANICAL NAME FLAGGING- ONE PER WIRE VODS. CONTAINER 4"-b" SHREDDED BARK 1. WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF INStlLLLATION WATERING MUST BE 5 FNLCH (-EWSTING GRADE SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SATURATE i 6' Ht. MINIMUM 1/2 WIDTH OF ROOT BALL ROOT BALL AND PLANTING HOLE. seed PLANTING SOL MMURE (SEE SPEC.) E. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 46 HOURS OF Y THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOL iUNDISTURBED OR STABILIZED MOISTURE 15 EXCES&VE. a SUBSOIL TREE PLANTING DETAIL. *_CONIFEROUS ,ar T4 2. _ 142 + \ A 143 \ -- _ 4 WDTH Soo (TVP. 3 UTLOT C 1 L-1 l - u � � u) --- 124 PLANT SCHEDULE TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER ^� RM 30 Acer rubrum'Northwood' Northwood Red Maple 2.5" Cal. B&B SIZE HL 21 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis ' Harve' Northern Acclaim Thornless Honey Locust 2.5" Cal. B&B 0 WO 18 Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak 2.5" Cal. B&B OBL 38 This americana 'Boulevard' Boulevard Linden 2.5" Cal. B&B CONIFEROUS TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER sW"a BH 5 Picea glauca densata Black Hills Spruce 6' Ht. B&B MnDOT Seed Mix 25-131 seed Refer to notes for acceptable seeding OR VEL 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 MN 55449 CONSTRUCTION ^� ��-- ENTRANCE / N ORNAMENTAL TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER Phone: (763) 489-7900 Fax; (763)489-7959 SB 3 Amelanchierxgrandiflora'Autumn Brilliance' Clump Form, 1.5" Cal Equivalent Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 7' Ht. B&B LANDSCAPE PLAN Of 1 sa•<oar<. rzroans cNut:+soot-eozo�eols-no"am<.��d navand:wo<�soss-1<"ds. ww. carlsonmccain.com F 11. d., the laws of the State of Minnesota GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER - _ I- I -I -I -I -I -I -I -I -I -I SOD 57,457 sf Turf Sod Bluegrass Kentucky Bluegrass sod TI 909,079 sf Type I - Low Maint. Turf Seed MnDOT Seed Mix 25-131 seed Refer to notes for acceptable seeding methods + Seeding Rate 330 Ib/ac 0 40 80 160 Til 73,727 sf Type II - Stormwater Seed Mix MnDOT Seed Mix 33-261 seed w w Refer to notes for acceptable seeding W W W methods (IN FEET) Seeding Rate 52.0 Ib/ac 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 MN 55449 1 hereb rti that this Ian, s fication Print Name: Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA y ce y p peci report was prepared by me or under my Drawn: RIR ReV1510nsi 1 2/4/19 per City Comments.•nvironmentalBlaine, FENWAY LAND COMPANY RICE LAKE RESERVEPRELIMINARY L1 �)Carlsqn McCain Ior • engineering 'surveying Phone: (763) 489-7900 Fax; (763)489-7959 direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Signature:- Licensed Lands cape Architect under Date: 10/22/19 License *: 56346 Designed: RIR Date: 10/22/19 13925 Fenway Boulevard North Hugo, Minnesota 55038 g Hugo, Minnesota LANDSCAPE PLAN Of 1 sa•<oar<. rzroans cNut:+soot-eozo�eols-no"am<.��d navand:wo<�soss-1<"ds. ww. carlsonmccain.com F 11. d., the laws of the State of Minnesota •�.. o�,c VICINITY MAP II LIGE LAKE RESERVE N H KP Pµ 0 Ja III HUGO, MINNESOTA II R RICE y LAKE II II A'a EGG 90 LANE I a III I OUTLOT A 3 1 N01 SITE AI'E.A 00 07-8 o4l 2 3 4 5 6 -� 7 8 111 10 „ 12 NOT TO SCALE — — — — — — — — I I \ S7]2EfT C , 4 15 I 2 1s 17 ----------- —� I 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 18 I SUMMARY III L_WIN PHASE 1 43 LOTS 12 13 19 PHASE II 25 LOTS 2 14 15 I I I PHASE III 25 LOTS �' II 17 2O 16 I I 93 LOTS I OUTLOT C fo i/ I � 21 I � 1 OUTLOT C 1 I I 22 i 1 1 1 s NOTE: 15 14 2 23 1 1.1 PHASING BJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO T MARKET ONDITIONS 0 4 1J 16 E TEMP ARY CUL-DE-SACS SACS SHALL B LL L1 ED AS REQUIRED AT PHASE 3 24 14 M TS — ° �� 17 �� J 1 9 5 4 �1 e 11 12 13 s 9 10 15 1 \ \ 18 AFF 8 7 S 7 8 T6 F- 1 I \ 19 20 6 4 5 4 W Ill it 21 3 4 �, II 41� OUTLOT C 22 32 1 2 23 30 31 24 ``\ 1 i' 2s29 28 26 27 OUTLOT 1 � O I 37TH STREET N__ °\ /aa----------- / I 20#4- N a / -- CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 4Q EGGL 5P 1 I • I % / �° 0 50 too 200 (IN FEET) BENCHMARK ow Wars below. a� m nt N< CaI I before you dig. i PP GSID MR S G— N. M< a mea Poul MNDT R< t. GSID Station No, 94800. Elevation = 932.38 FT. 2. MNDOT G--Monumen e, Station No. 95087. El—ti., - 932.39 a EagleFT. GSID The subsurface utility information shown on this plan is utility Quality Level D. This quality level w s determined ....,ding to the guidelines of CI/ASCE 38-02, entitled "Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility 0ato." 3890 Pheasant Ride Drive NE, Suite 100evisions: (� Carlson D g I hereby ce tiry that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian ]. Krystafiak, P.E.PEDrawn: KRO 12/4/19 Revised Trail and Sidewalk Layout, and Addition of Lots F E N WAY LAND COMPANY mental Blaine, MN 55449 dr report wa inion and tby hat I am a doer my RICE LAKE RESERVE • I •engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and that) amaduly Signature: Designed: 8JK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North PHASING PLAN Of •surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 LicensedProfessionalEngineerunder Hugo, Minnesota McCain www carlsonmccain.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 1 N 0 100 200 400 ( SCALE IN FEET ) 0, Z 0) = WO)� O• y Lr, M L U) 0 y Zoz^ LL VVWcm� �No^ w a2 � Im 2 W p L a ~ W Ca � =W m X U) o LU W V' Q W c Z Y2: J J rn W � w W = O u 2 Zy Q `o azm g o 0 O;