Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020.01.06 CC PacketAgenda HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HUGO CITY HALL 14969 Fitzgerald Avenue North • Hugo. MN SS039 MONDAY. JANUARY 6. 2020 — 7 P.M. A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. December 12, 2019, Holiday Party 2. December 16, 2019, City Council Meeting E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Recognition of Sergeant Joe Stoehr and Introduction of Sergeant Joe Zerwas and Investigator Lee Mars G. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion and a roll call vote. If a member of the City Council or the public wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approve Claims Roster 2. Approve Appointment of Becky Petryk as Acting Mayor 3. Approve Appointment of WSB and Associates as City Engineer 4. Approve Appointment of Landform as City Planner 5. Approve Appointment of Johnson & Turner as City Attorney 6. Approve Appointment of Baker Tilly as Financial Advisor 7. Approve Appointment of Fire Chief Kevin Colvard as Emergency Management Director 8. Approve Appointment of US Bank as Depository for City Funds 9. Approve Appointment of The Citizen as Official Newspaper 10. Approve Appointments to Hugo Firefighter Relief Association 11. Approve Resolution on Statutory Tort Liability Limits 12. Approve Appointment of Bronwen Kleissler as Chair of the Planning Commission and Scott Arcand as Vice -Chair 13. Approve Appointment of Dave Strub as Chair and Cathy Moore-Arcand as Vice -Chair of the Parks and Recreation Commission 14. Approve Appointment of Cynthia Schoonover as Chair of Historical Commission 15. Approve Appointment of Tom Weidt and Phil Klein as Council Representatives on the EDA 16. Approve Appointment of Mayor Tom Weidt and Planning Commissioner Scott Arcand as Representatives on the Board of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments 17. Approve Appointment of Tom Weidt as Chair of the Board of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments 18. Approve Animal Control Service Contracts with Companion Animal Control and Otter Lake Animal Hospital for 2020 19. Approve Amendments to the Agreement with City of Scandia for Building Inspection Services 20. Approve Resolution and Conditional Use Permit for Shared Driveway on Keller Avenue (Jeff Penton and Shirley E. Nelson -Hill Trust) 21. Approve Ordinance Rezoning Property at 9822 152nd Street North (Ed Tschida) 22. Approve Resolution Approving Planned Unit Development Amendment for Adelaide Landing 23. Approve Resolutions Approving Variance, Conditional Use Permit, and Termination of Development Agreement and Restrictive Covenants for Properties on Henna Ave. (Scanlon) H. PUBLIC HEARING 1. None Scheduled I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Goodview Avenue Improvement Project — Receive Feasibility Study and Set Public Hearing J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Approve Resolution Approving Rice Lake Reserves Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. None Scheduled L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. Update on Yellow Ribbon Network M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. Hugo Fire Department Annual Banquet on Saturday, January 18, 2020 2. Council Meeting Cancelled for Monday, January 20, 2020 3. Council Goal Setting Session on Monday, January 27, 2020 N. ADJOURNMENT BACKGROUND MEMO FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON JANUARY 6, 2020 D.1 Approval of Minutes for the December 12, 2019, Holiday Party D.2 Approval of Minutes for the December 16, 2019, City Council Meeting Staff recommends Council approve the above minutes as presented. F.1 Recognition of Sergeant Joe Stoehr and Introduction of Sergeant Joe Zerwas and Investigator Lee Mars Washington County Sheriff's Office has made changes in the personnel assigned to Hugo. Sergeant Joe Stoehr has been moved to Sergeant of General Investigations at the County, and taking his place as Hugo's Sergeant is former Hugo Investigator Joe Zerwas. Hugo Deputy Lee Mars has been promoted to the Investigator position. Council will recognize Sergeant Joe Stoehr for his service in Hugo and Sheriff Dan Starry will introduce to Council Sergeant Joe Zerwas and Investigator Lee Mars. G. 1 Approval of Claims Staff recommends Council approve the Claims Roster as presented. G. 2 Approve Appointment of Becky Petryk as Acting Mayor Each year, the Council appoints a member of the Council for the position of Acting Mayor. On behalf of Mayor Tom Weidt, City staff recommends approval of the appointment of Council Member Becky Petryk as Acting Mayor for the year 2020. G. 3 Approve Appointment of WSB and Associates as City Engineer WSB Engineers has been the City Engineer for the past 16 years. Mark Erichson has handled the day-to-day civil engineering duties, and Pete Willenbring continues as the water resource engineer. WSB Engineers is requesting to continue to provide this service to the City at the revised rate schedule as enclosed. City staff recommends approval of the appointment of WSB Engineers and Mark Erichson as the City Engineer for 2020. G. 4 Approve Appointment of Landform as City Planner Kendra Lindahl from Landform has worked over the past 17 years as the City Planner. Landform would like to continue to provide this service to the City at a revised rate schedule. City staff recommends approval of the appointment of Kendra Lindahl as the City Planner/Planning Consultant for the year 2020. G. 5 Approve Appointment of Johnson & Turner as City Attorney City Attorney Dave Snyder has served the City with the law firm of Johnson & Turner for the past six years. Johnson & Turner would like to continue to provide legal services to the City. City staff recommends approval of the appointment of David K. Snyder and the Johnson & Turner Law Firm as the City Attorney for the year 2020. G.6 Approve Appointment of Baker Tilly as Financial Advisor Financial advisors Paul Steinman, Mikaela Huot, and Nick Dragisich and the other members of the Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP (formerly Springsted, Inc.) team have served the City very well over the years on a wide variety of projects. City staff recommends approval of Paul Steinman, Mikaela Huot, and Nick Dragisich, from Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP, as the City's financial advisors for the year 2020. G.7 Approve Appointment of Fire Chief Kevin Colvard as Emergency Management Director Each year, Council appoints a member of the City staff to serve in the role of Emergency Management Director. For the past decade, the Fire Chief has served in this position. City staff recommends the appointment of the Fire Chief Kevin Colvard as the City's Emergency Management Director for 2020. G.8 Approve Appointment of US Bank as Depository for City Funds Each year, Council selects a depository/bank for the deposit of City funds. For many years, Council has selected the local Hugo branch of US Bank. City staff recommends the approval of U.S. Bank -Hugo as the official depository for City funds for 2020. G.9 Approve Appointment of The Citizen as Official Newspaper Each year, Council selects a newspaper as the official publication for all public notices and publishing of ordinances. For the past twelve years, the City Council appointed The Citizen as the City's new official newspaper, and The Citizen would like to continue to provide this service at a slightly increased rate. City staff recommends Council approve The Citizen as the City's official newspaper for 2020. G. 10 Approve Appointments to Hugo Firefighter Relief Association Minnesota State Statute requires the official appointment of the ex-officio members of the Hugo Fire Department Relief Association Board. Council must appoint two elected or appointed members. City staff recommends appointment of Mayor Tom Weidt, with Councilmember Chuck Haas as his designee in his absence, and Finance Director Ron Otkin as ex-officio members of the Hugo Fire Department Relief Association Board. G. 11 Approve Resolution on Statutory Tort Liability Limits In the late 1990's the League of Minnesota Insurance Trust required each City that obtained liability coverage from them to decide whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of coverage purchased. Currently these limits are $500,000 per claimant and $1,500,000 per occurrence. At that time the City Council opted not to waive the statutory limits. LMCIT requires each member city to reaffirm their position on an annual basis. Staff recommends Council approve the resolution on statutory tort limits. G.12 Approve Appointment of Bronwen Kleissler as Chair of the Planning Commission and Scott Arcand as Vice -Chair Annually, Council appoints a member of the Planning Commission to serve as the chair and vice -chair. Bronwen Kleissler has been serving as the chair of the Planning Commission since August, 2015, and Scott Arcand has served as vice -chair since February, 2018. Staff recommends Council approve the reappointment of Bronwen Kleissler as the chair of the Planning Commission and Scott Arcand as vice -chair for 2020. G.13 Approve Appointment of Dave Strub as Chair and Cathy Moore-Arcand as Vice - Chair of the Parks and Recreation Commission Annually, the City Council appoints members of the Parks Commission to serve as chair and vice -chair. Dave Strub has served as chair of the Parks and Recreation Commission since November, 2016, and Cathy Moore-Arcand has served as vice -chair since January 2017. City staff recommends reappointment of Dave Strub as chair and Cathy Moore-Arcand as vice -chair for the Parks and Recreation Commission for 2020. G.14 Approve Appointment of Cynthia Schoonover as Chair of Historical Commission Annually, the City Council appoints a member of the Historical Commission to serve as the chair of the Commission. Cynthia Schoonover has served as the chair of the Commission since July, 2015. Staff recommends Council approve the reappointment of Cynthia as the chair of the Historical Commission for 2020. G.15 Approve Appointment of Tom Weidt and Phil Klein as Council Representatives on the EDA Annually, Council appoints two representatives from the Hugo City Council to serve on the Economic Development Authority (EDA). Staff recommends Council appoint Mayor Weidt and Council Member Klein to continue to serve as the Council Representatives on the EDA for 2020. G.16 Approve Appointment of Mayor Tom Weidt and Planning Commissioner Scott Arcand as Representatives on the Board of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments Annually, the Hugo City Council appoints a member of the Planning Commission, City Council, and a resident to serve on the Board of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments. Tom Weidt has agreed to serve another year as the City Council Representative, and Scott Arcand has agreed to serve another year as the Planning Commission representative. Staff recommends Council approve the reappointment of Tom Weidt as the City Council representative and Scott Arcand as the Planning Commission representative to serve on the Board of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments for another one-year term. G.17 Approve Appointment of Tom Weidt as Chair of the Board of Zoning Adjustments Annually, Council approves appointment of Chair of the Board of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments. Staff recommends Council reappoint Board Member Tom Weidt as Chair of the Board of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments. G.18 Approve Animal Control Service Contracts with Companion Animal Control and Otter Lake Animal Hospital for 2020 Since July 2013, Companion Animal Control and Otter Lake Animal Hospital have been providing animal control services to the City. Staff recommends continuation of the current contracts with Companion Animal Control and Otter Lake Animal Hospital for 2020. G.19 Approve Amendments to the Agreement with City of Scandia for Building Inspection Services For the past five years, the City of Hugo has been providing building inspection services to the City of Scandia according to an agreement with them. After reviewing the associated fees, staff would like to increase the cost per inspection from $58 to $60 and the rate per mile from $.565 to $.58. This would be the first change to the agreement since its adoption in 2015. Staff recommends Council approve the amendment to the agreement with the City of Scandia for Building inspection services. G.20 Approve Resolution and Conditional Use Permit for Shared Driveway on Keller Avenue (Jeff Penton and Shirley E. Nelson -Hill Trust) Jeff Penton and Shirley E. Nelson -Hill Trust have applied for a conditional use permit for a shared driveway between properties generally located north of 122nd Street North and west of Keller Avenue North. A CUP is required for a driveway if it is shared by two or more separate parcels. At its December 19, 2019 meeting, the Hugo Planning Commission considered the request and held a public hearing. No one spoke at the public hearing. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the conditional use permit to the City Council, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution and draft conditional use permit. G.21 Approve Ordinance Rezoning Property at 9822 152nd Street North (Ed Tschida) Ed Tschida has submitted a zoning amendment request to rezone the property located at 9822 152nd Street North from the Long Term Agricultural Zoning District to the Agricultural Zoning District. At its December 19, 2019 meeting, the Hugo Planning Commission considered the request and held a public hearing. No one spoke at the public hearing. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the ordinance for rezoning to the City Council. G.22 Approve Resolution Approving Planned Unit Development Amendment for Adelaide Landing OP5 Adelaide (Excelsior Group) is requesting approval of a PUD Amendment to revise the building setbacks for the 50-foot wide single family lots on the northern portion of the development. There are 51 lots approved in the area with the preliminary plat, the total number of lots will not change. At its Thursday, December 19, 2019, meeting the Planning Commission considered and held a public hearing on the request. Staff recommended approval of the request to the Planning Commission. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the PUD amendment OP5 Adelaide (Excelsior Group) for the development to be known as "Adelaide Landing", subject to the conditions listed in the resolutions. G.23 Approve Resolutions Approving Variance, Conditional Use Permit, and Termination of Development Agreement and Restrictive Covenants for Properties on Henna Ave. Scanlon Wayne Scanlan is requesting approval a variance for the property located at 17530 Henna Avenue North for the property to have zero feet of street frontage, where 300 feet is required by ordinance. The applicant is also requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for shared driveway that provides access to 3 parcels, parcels A, B, and C (17530 Henna Avenue North, 17590 Henna Avenue North, and 7355 177th Street North,). In addition, the applicant is requesting that an existing covenant be released that is against the properties at 7355 177th Street North and 17530 Henna Avenue North. At its Thursday, December 19, 2019, meeting the Planning Commission reviewed and considered and held a public hearing on the request. Staff recommended approval of the requests. The Planning Commission agreed that the applications met the criteria necessary to approve the variance and CUP requests and recommended approval of the applications to the City Council, subject to the conditions listed the resolutions. The Planning Commission also recommended approval of the release of the covenant against parcel 7355 177th Street North and 17530 Henna Avenue North, if the variance and CUP are approved with the conditions listed in the resolutions. I.1 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project — Receive Feasibility Study and Set Public Hearing The 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project Improvement Project is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Plan to address the poor condition of the roadway. On October 21, 2019, the Hugo City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project. The 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project Improvement Project consists of roadway improvements on Goodview Avenue North from the southern city border to Egg Lake Road/ 137th Street/County Road 8. The City held a neighborhood meeting on November 20, 2019, to receive input on the project. Proposed improvements throughout the project include bituminous pavement reclamation, minor subgrade corrections, and minor drainage improvements, with grading and culvert replacement only as necessary to address isolated drainage issues. Roadway options were considered during preliminary design. Option 1 consists of bituminous reclamation and paving at the existing widths; Option 2 consists of bituminous reclamation and paving with minor shoulder widening. The cost of Option 1 is estimated at $1,320,000. Option 2 is estimated at $1,540,000. These project costs include a 10% contingency and 25% indirect costs. Funding for the project will consist of special assessments, City Street CIP Funds, and State Aid Funds. Staff is recommending City Council approve the resolution receiving the feasibility report and setting the public hearing for February 3, 2020. J.1 Approve Resolution Approving Rice Lake Reserves Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat Fenway Land Company is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a residential development. The preliminary plat includes 93 single family residential lots and 3 outlots to be known as "Rice Lake Reserve". At its December 19, 2019, meeting the Planning Commission considered and held a public hearing on the request. Staff recommended approval of the request, subject to revisions outlined in the resolution. The Planning Commission, with a vote of 5-1, made a recommendation to approve the PUD and preliminary plat, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution, and a revision that a neighborhood gathering space be located in the area south of the lift station (central to the development), with at least one lot being removed for its placement. LA Update on the Yellow Ribbon Network Council Member Chuck Haas and Phil Klein will report to Council on the Yellow Ribbon Network activities held recently. M.1 Hugo Fire Department Annual Banquet on Saturday, January 18, 2020 The City Council has been invited to attend the Hugo Fire Department Annual Banquet on Saturday, January 18, 2020. The event will be held at the Hugo American Legion from 6-9 p.m. Staff recommends Council schedule this as a meeting if they wish to attend. M.2 Council Meeting Cancelled for Monday, January 20, 2020 The second Council meeting in the month of January falls on the Martin Luther King Holiday. At the December 17, 2018, meeting, Council cancelled the January 20, 2020, Council meeting. M.3 Council Goal Setting Session on Monday, January 27, 2020 The Council has scheduled their annual goal setting session for Monday, January 27, 2020. The meeting will take place in the Council Chambers at 6:00 p.m. N. Adl'ournment i CITY OF EST. 1906 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North • Hugo, MN 55038 Minutes HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HOLIDAY PARTY THURSDAY. DECEMBER 12. 2019 PRESENT: Haas, Klein, Miron, Weidt ABSENT: Petryk OTHERS PRESENT: City Staff, Commissioners, Guests The Hugo City Council attended the City of Hugo Holiday Parry held at the Hugo American Legion and catered by The Post. Happy Hour was at 5:30 p.m. and dinner was served at 6:30 p.m. The event ended at approximately 9:00 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Michele Lindau City Clerk 00 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North • Hugo. MN 55038 Call to Order Minutes HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HUGO CITY HALL MONDAY, DECEMBER 16, 2019 — 7 P.M. Mayor Weidt called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. PRESENT: Haas, Klein, Miron, Petryk, Weidt ABSENT: None ALSO PRESENT: City Administrator Bryan Bear, City Engineer Mark Erichson, City Attorney Dave Snyder, Community Development Director Rachel Juba, City Clerk Michele Lindau Moment of Silence for National Guard Soldiers Chief Warrant Officers James Rogers, age 28 and Charles P. Nord, age 30, and Sergeant Kort Plantenberg, age 28, all of the Minnesota National Guard, were killed in the UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter crash, Thursday, December 5, 2019, southwest of St. Cloud. Mayor Weidt called for a Moment of Silence in remembrance of the three soldiers. Approve Minutes for the December 2, 2019 City Council Meeting Klein made motion, Miron seconded, to approve the minutes for the regular City Council meeting held on December 2, 2019, as presented. All Ayes. Motion carried. Approve Minutes for the December 10, 2019, HBA Holiday Party Klein made motion, Miron seconded, to approve the minutes for the Hugo Area Business Association Holiday Party held on December 10, 2019, as presented. All Ayes. Motion carried. Approval of Agenda Weidt made motion, Petryk seconded, to approve the agenda as amended by adding the acceptance of a donation to the Hugo Fire Department from the Hugo American Legion. All Ayes. Motion carried. Update on Yellow Ribbon Network and Recognition of Sponsors Council Member Chuck Haas began by providing a report to Council on the Yellow Ribbon Network activities held recently. He showed pictures of the recent Welcome Home Pheasant Event including one of Jeff Hughs, owner and manager of Wild Wings, who received an award from the Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for December 16, 2019 Page 2 of 7 National Guard for his years of dedicated service to the military and families. He also showed a photo of an award given by the 133rd Air Wing and some photos of care package recipients. Haas recognized the sponsors of the Yellow Ribbon Burger Nights during 2019, and State Chaplain Lieutenant Colonel Buddy Winn presented the Sponsor of the Year Award to Oneka Ridge Golf Course and the Arcand Family. Recognition of the Forest Lake Rotary Club and Abigail Leigield Haas recognized Forest Lake High School students for their support of deployed military members. Haas explained that Council Member Miron connected him with students who were doing a care package event. He presented a Certificate of Appreciation to the Rotary Club and to Abigail Leigjeld who lead the event. Blanket Donation to Yellow Ribbon Network by Oneka Elementary Students Janet Dickenson's from Oneka Elementary School was in attendance with some of her students to present homemade fleece blankets to the YRN to be included in the care packages sent to military members. Janet explained that 180 kids helped make 87 blankets. Haas called for a five minute recess. The meeting reconvened at 7:29 p.m. Consent Agenda Miron made motion, Klein seconded to approve the following Consent Agenda: 1. Approval of Claims 2. Approve Annual Performance Review for Building Inspector Scott Baller 3. Approve Annual Performance Review for Community Development Director Rachel Juba 4. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Ryan McCullough 5. Approve Resolution for Renewal of 2020 Liquor and Tobacco Licenses 6. Approve Resolution Certifying Delinquent Utility Accounts 7. Approve Ordinance Establishing 2020 Fee Schedule and Publication of Summary Ordinance 8. Approve Renewal of Term for EDA Member Tom Denaway 9. Approve Renewal of Term for Planning Commissioner David Fry 10. Approve Renewal of Terms for Parks Commissioners Cathy Moore-Arcand, Nicole Schmid, and Ranell Tennyson 11. Approve Renewal of Term for Board of Zoning and Adjustments Member Maria Mulvihill 12. Approve Renewal of Terms for Historical Commissioner Cynthia Schoonover and Trina Oswald and Joyce Granger as Associate Member 13. Approve Pay Voucher No. 1 from Peterson Companies, Inc. for Waters Edge Stormwater Reuse Project Phase 2 14. Approve Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit for St. Genevieve Fish Fry on April 3, 2020 Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for December 16, 2019 Page 3 of 7 15. Approve Acceptance of Utility and Partial Street Improvements for Adelaide Landing 1 st Addition 16. Approve Acceptance of Utility and Street Improvements for Adelaide Landing 2nd Addition 17. Approve Reduction in the Letter of Credit for Oneka Place 3rd Addition 18. Approve Reduction in the Letter of Credit for Fable Hill 6th Addition 19. Approve Retirement of Ron Gray from the Hugo Fire Department 20. Approve Advertisement and Sale of Public Works 2006 Sterling Plow Truck 21. Donation to the Hugo Fire Department from the Hugo American Legion. All Ayes. Motion carried. Approve Claims Roster Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Claims Roster as presented. Approve Annual Performance Review for Building Inspector Scott Bailer Scott Baller was hired by the City as a Building Inspector on January 1, 2006. Over the past 14 years, Scott completed building inspector duties as well as provided coverage for the front counter. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the annual performance review for Building Inspector Scott Baller. Approve Annual Performance Review for Community Development Director Rachel Juba Rachel Juba was hired as the City's new Associate Planner on January 2, 2007 and promoted to Planner in 2010, then Community Development Director in May, 2018. Over the past 13 years, Rachel worked in the Community Development Department and provided support for the Economic Development Authority and Planning Commission. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the annual performance review for Community Development Director Rachel Juba. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Ryan McCullough Ryan McCullough was hired on January 2, 2007 as the City of Hugo's new Public Works Maintenance Worker. Ryan worked over the past 13 years in a wide variety of the duties completed by the Public Works Department including snowplowing, landscape maintenance, sewer work, and water work. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the annual performance review for Public Works Maintenance Worker Ryan McCullough. Approve Resolution for Renewal of 2020 Liquor and Tobacco Licenses Staff had received the appropriate applications for renewals of Liquor and Tobacco licenses for 2020. City recommended Council approve the resolution approving the annual renewal of the 2020 liquor and tobacco licenses subject to payment of all requested fees, taxes, and receipt of certificates of liquor liability insurance. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved RESOLUTION 2019-55 RENEWAL OF 2020 LIQUOR AND TOBACCO LICENSES. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for December 16, 2019 Page 4 of 7 Approve Resolution Certifying Delinquent Utility Accounts Annually, the Finance Department reviews all delinquent utility bills, which are the result of nonpayment or underpayment of water and sewer utility bills. In accordance with City Ordinance, Council is required to adopt a resolution to certify delinquent utility bills to the property tax rolls. Property owners who have not paid their outstanding utility bill will have it certified to the property tax rolls. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved RESOLUTION 2019-56 CERTIFYING UNPAID UTILITY BILLS TO THE COUNTY AUDITOR FOR COLLECTION. Approve Ordinance Establishing 2020 Fee Schedule and Publication of Summary Ordinance City staff annually reviews the fee, rates and charges schedule and recommends changes. The Finance Department had reviewed these changes and incorporated them into the fee schedule for 2020. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved ORDINANCE 2019 - 496 AUTHORIZING ESTABLISHMENT OF FEES, RATES AND CHARGES. Approve Renewal of Term for EDA Member Tom Denaway Staff had contacted Tom Denaway regarding the expiration of his term as member of the EDA at the end of the year. Tom indicated he would like to be reappointed to the EDA for another six year term. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the reappointment of Tom Denaway to the EDA for a term to expire on December 31, 2025. Approve Renewal of Terms for Planning Commissioner David Fry Staff had contacted Planning Commissioner David Fry regarding the expiration of his term as Commissioner at the end of the year. David indicated he would like to be reappointed to the Planning Commission for another four-year term. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the reappointment of Commissioner David Fry for another four-year term on the Planning Commission to expire December 31, 2023. Approve Renewal of Terms for Parks Commissioners Cathy Moore-Arcand, Nicole Schmid, and Ranell Tennyson Staff had contacted Parks Commissioners Cathy Moore-Arcand, Nicole Schmid, and Ranell Tennyson regarding the expiration of their terms as Commissioners at the end of the year. All indicated they would like to be reappointed to the Parks Commission. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the reappointment of Commissioners Cathy Moore-Arcand, Nicole Schmid, and Ranell Tennyson for three-year terms to expire on December 31, 2022. Approve Renewal of Term for Board of Zoning and Adjustments Member Maria Mulvihill Annually, the Council appoints a resident to serve on the Board of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments. Maria Mulvihill currently served in the position and would like to be reappointed Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for December 16, 2019 Page 5 of 7 to serve another one year term. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the reappointment of Maria Mulvihill to the Board of Zoning for a one-year term to expire on December 31, 2020. Approve Renewal of Terms for Historical Commissioner Cvnthia Schoonover and Trina Oswald, and Joyce Granger as Associate Member Staff had contacted Historical Commissioners Cynthia Schoonover, Trina Oswald, and Joyce Granger regarding expiration of their terms at the end of the year. Cynthia and Trina indicated a desire to serve another three-year term on the Historical Commission, and Joyce Granger wanted to continue to serve but as an Associate Member. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the reappointment of Cynthia Schoonover and Trina Oswald for three-year terms to expire on December 31, 2022 and appointment of Joyce Granger as an Associate member for a two-year term to expire on December 31, 2021. Approve Pay Voucher No. 1 from Peterson Companies, Inc. for Waters Edge Stormwater Reuse Proiect Phase 2 The City had received Pay Voucher No. 1 from Peterson Companies, Inc. for work done on Waters Edge Stormwater Reuse Project Phase 2. Staff had reviewed the pay request and found it acceptable for the work certified through November 29, 2019. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved payment in the amount of $167,812.27 to Peterson Companies, Inc. Approve Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit for Church of St. Genevieve Fish Fry on April 3,2020 The Church of St. Genevieve had applied for a Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit to conduct a 50150 raffle (50% to food shelves, 50% as prizes) during their Fish Fry on April 3, 2020. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit for the Church of St. Genevieve. Approve Acceptance of Utility and Partial Street Improvements for Adelaide Landing 1st Addition OP5 Adelaide (Excelsior Group) had requested the City accept the utilities within the street right-of-way and street improvements (from TH 61 to the east side of the Foxhill/Fondant intersection) for Adelaide Landing 1st Addition. City staff had inspected the work and recommended the City accept the improvements. Acceptance of the utilities did not include storm sewer and storm ponds outside of the street right-of-way. Adoption of the Consent Agenda accepted these improvements and began the one year warranty period. Approve Acceptance of Utility and Street Improvements for Adelaide Landing 2nd Addition OP5 Adelaide (Excelsior Group) had requested the City accept the utilities within the street right-of-way and street improvements for the Adelaide Landing 2nd Addition. City staff had inspected the work and recommended the City accept the improvements. Acceptance of the utilities did not include storm sewer and storm ponds outside of the street right-of-way. Adoption of the Consent Agenda accepted these improvements and began the one year warranty period. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for December 16, 2019 Page 6 of 7 Approve Reduction in the Letter of Credit for Oneka Place 3rd Addition Oneka Place 3rd Addition had significant work completed to date, and the developer had requested a reduction in the letter of credit. The current letter of credit was in the amount of $2,131,352. Staff had inspected the work completed to date and recommended reducing the letter of credit by $1,574,211 based on the value of the work remaining to be completed. The remaining value of the letter of credit would be in the amount of $557,141. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the reduction in letter of credit for Oneka Place 3rd Addition. Approve Reduction in the Letter of Credit for Fable Hill 6th Addition Fable Hills 6th Addition had significant work completed to date, and the developer was requesting a reduction in the letter of credit. The current letter of credit was in the amount of $745,739. Staff had inspected the work completed to date and recommended reducing the letter of credit by $548,443 based on the value of the work remaining to be completed. The remaining value of the letter of credit would be in the amount of $197,296. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approve the reduction in letter of credit and cash escrow for Fable Hill 6th Addition. Approve Retirement of Ron Gray from the Hugo Fire Department Ron Gray had submitted his letter of retirement after 40 years of service on the Fire Department. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the retirement of Firefighter Ron Gray effective February 15, 2020. Weidt made motion, Miron seconded, to invite Ron Gray to a future Council meeting to recognize his years of service on the Fire Department. All Ayes. Motion carried. Approve Advertisement and Sale of Public Works 2006 Sterling Plow Truck Approved at the December 18, 2017 City Council meeting was the purchase of a 2018 Mack plow truck for the Public Works Department. This truck had been received and replaced a 2006 Sterling single axle plow truck (206-06). Adoption of the Consent Agenda authorized staff to advertise and hold a sealed bid opening for the sale of the 2006 Sterling plow truck. Donation to the Hugo Fire Department from the Hugo American Legion Staff added this to the agenda to accept a donation from the Hugo American Legion to the Hugo Fire Department in the amount of $300. These funds will go toward department training and equipment. Adoption of the Consent Agenda accepted the donation of $300 to the Hugo Fire Department. Cancel January 20, 2020 Regular Council Meeting City Administrator Bryan Bear explained that every year, the Council's second meeting in January falls on the Martin Luther King Holiday. There were no agenda items scheduled for this meeting and he recommended Council cancel the meeting on January 20, 2020. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for December 16, 2019 Page 7 of 7 Klein made motion, Miron seconded, to cancel the regular City Council meeting on January 20, 2020. All Ayes. Motion carried. Schedule Goal Setting Session City Administrator Bryan Bear explained that every year Council schedules a Goal Setting Session in January to establish goals and on -going priorities for the year. Bear recommended Council select a date on which to hold the Goal Setting Session. Weidt made motion, Klein seconded, to schedule the Goal Setting Session for Monday, January 27, 2020, at 6 p.m. All Ayes. Motion carried. Schedule Local Board of Appeals and Equalization Meeting for Thursday, April 9, 2020 The Hugo City Council acts as the City's Local Board of Appeals and Equalization. City Administrator Bryan Bear notified Council Washington County requested the LBAE meeting be held on Thursday, April 9, 2020 at 5:30 p.m. Weidt made motion, Petryk seconded, to schedule the Local Board of Appeals and Equalization for Thursday, April 9, 2020, at 5:30 p.m. at Hugo City Hall. All Ayes. Motion carried. Schedule Winter Recreational Activities Staff had provide the Council a flyer announcing upcoming recreational activities and recommended Council review the events and let staff know in the future if they wish to attend any. Adjournment Haas made motion, Petryk seconded, to adjourn at 7:38 p.m. All Ayes. Motion carried. Respectfully Submitted, Michele Lindau City Clerk City of Hugo Claims January 6, 2020 G. 1 Vendor Invoice Amount Description Department . s. ANININNA60111116 10,000 Lakes Chapter 2020 _ $ 95.00 2020 Membership Dues Building Inspections Allstream 16557260 $ 102.03 Fax Lines Administration American Public Works Assoc 671710 $ 260.00 APWA Member Fees - Scott Anderson Public Works Ancom Technical Center 92319 _ _ $ 13.00 Pager Repairs Fire Dept Anderson, Scott CLAIM - $ 5,00 For Sale Posting - Unit #206-06 (Craigslist) Street Dot meet Co Aspen E ui m an 10211901 $ 1,558.75 Parts for Plow Trucks Street Dept Aspen Mills 248831 $ 2,316.51 HFD Polo Shirts, Vests, T-Shirts & Sweatshirts Fire Dept Baller, Scott CLAIM $ 36.48 iPad Accessories (Amazon) Building Inspections Baller, Scott CLAIM $ 16.11 iPad Accessories (Amazon) Building Inspections Baller, Scott CLAIM $ 65.00 Building Official License Renewal Fee Building Inspections Bound Tree Medical LLC 83441997 $ 389,95 Medical Supplies Fire Dept Canteen Refreshment Services MSP5845 $ 122.74 Breakroom Supplies Public Works Cargill Incorporated 2905135284 $ 10,957.11 Salt for Snow & Ice Control Street Dept CDW Government VZJ0484 $ 65.24 iPad Chargers Public Works CDW Government VZJ0484 $ 64.21 Cell Phone Accessories Public Works CDW Government VZQ3504 $ 44.25 Cell Phone Accessories Public Works CDW Government VZQ3504 $ 31.54 iPad Screen Protector _ Public Works CDW Government VZZ9393 $ 13.01 Cell Phone Accessories _Public Works Cintas Corporation November $ 422.42 Cleaning Supplies Various Cintas Corporation November $ 1,272.16 Uniform & Floor Mat Services Various Cintas Corporation November $ 620.19 Sup lies &Floor Mat Services Fire Dept Cintas Corporation November $ (1,682.92) 2619 Service Credits Various Cintas Corporation 5015319180 $ 299.54 First Aid Supplies Gen Gov't Bldgs Cintas Corporation 5015694020 $ 183.32 First Aid Supplies Public Works Cintas Corporation 5015694020 $ 135.71 First Aid Su lies Gen Gov't Bldgs Clarey's Safety Equipment Inc 185908 $ 180.00 Calibration of Gas Monitors _ Fire Dept Comcast 12/5/2019 $ 2.25 Business Internet (thru January 14): Fire Dept Comcast 12/12/2019 $ 10.50 Business Cable (thru January 21) _ Administration Companion Animal Control LLC September $ 179.06 Callout Fees & Mileage Animal Control Core & Main LP L707656 $ 2,452.00 _ Encapsulation Sleeves - Watermain Repairs Water Utility Custom Ca[. & Tire LLC 270023651 $ 656.00 Tires - Unit #111-15 Buildin Inspections De Lag e Landen Financial Services Inc 66029501 $ 311.37 December Copier Lease Payment Administration Dresser Trap Rock Inc + 114436 $ 570.67 3/8'. Chips for Snow & Ice Control _ _ Street Dept Duncanson, Gina CLAIM $ 160.45 Fire Marshal Mileage Fire Dept Earl F. Andersen 0122200-IN $ 6,889.30 Street Sign Plates Street Dept Earl F. Andersen I 0122222-IN $ 77.30 Arrow Signs Street Dept Earl F. Andersen i 0122227-CM $ (41.76) Street Sign Plates (Recycling) _ Street Dept Earl F. Andersen 0122229-CM $ (135.77) Street Sign Plates (Recycling) Street Dept Economic Development Assn of MN 2020 $ 295.00 2020 Membership Dues - Rachel Juba _ Plannin & Zoning Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc MP110719-50 $ 301.45 Light Bar - Unit #101-15 Public Works Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc MP110719-50 $ 301.45 Light Bar - Unit #117-19 Engineering Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc MP110719-50 $ 602.90 Light Bar - Units #111-15 & #113-16 Build in Id nspections Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc MP11071950A $ 250.00 Light Bar - Unit #101-15 Public Works Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc MP11071950A $ 250.00 Light Bar - Unit #109-15 Street Dept Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc MP11071950A $ 500.00 Light Bar - Units #111-15 & #113-16 Building Inspections Excel AV Group_ 138571 $ 920.00 Oneka Room Technology Upgrades Gen Gov't Bldgs Grainger 9369685277 $ 168.12 Light Bulbs, Ice Cleats, Glove Dispenser, Etc Fire Dept Grainger _ _9382831726 $ 42.53 Latex Glove Dispenser Fire Dept Grainger _ 9382831726 $ 241.20 Ice Cleats Fire Dept Holiday. Companies 150830003 $ 37.12 Fuel Fire Dept Holiday Companies 121226012 $ 13.05 Fuel Street Dept Home Depot Credit Services 6510779 $ 1976. Safety Supplies Public Works Home Depot Credit Services 6510779 $ 22.99 Hardware - Oneka Room Tech Upgrade Gen Gov't Bldgs Home Depot Credit Services 5510850 $ 11.48 Hardware - Oneka Room Tech Upgrade Gen Gov't Bldgs Home Depot Credit Services 5142192 $ (20,86) Hardware - Oneka Room Tech Upgrade (Returnedi Gen Gov't Bldgs Innovative Office Solutions LLC PF-SO-2811916 $ 12,404.46 Oneka Room Furniture Gen Gov't Bldgs Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN2795678 $ 116.37 W-2 Forms & Envelopes Finance Dept Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN2801214 $ 60.98 Wall Calendars _ Fire Deli Instrumental Research Inc 2285 $ 100.00 Water Bacteria Testing Water Utility Jensen, Dave CLAIM _ $ 485.27 Fire Department Meeting Supplies Fire Dept Johnson/Turner November $ 4,829.00 Prosecution Fees jFlat Fee) General Legal Johnson/Turner November' $ 294.95 Disbursements Prosecution Costs) General Legal Johnson/Turner November $ 3,529.50 Civil Legal Fees - See Attached Breakdown General Legal Knife Lake Concrete Inc 11/25/2019 $ 77,373.00 2019 Misc Concrete Work Street Dept Laughlin's Pest Control 32480 $ 85.00 December Pest Control Service +CH; Gen Gov't Bldgs Leadership Growth Groups LLC 20203 _ $ 600.00 Advanced Management Program - Bryan Bear Administration Le ue of Minnesota Cities 312874 $ 300.00 LEAD Academy Registration - Rachel Juba Planning & Zoning en Lebs Floral & Garden_ 8271 $ 550.00 Landscaping Supplies Gen Gov't Bid s Lozier, Amber CLAIM 1 $ 7.52 Mileage . Public Works Page 1 City of Hugo Claims January 6, 2020 G. 1 Vendor Invoice Amount Description Department AL Lozier, Amber CLAIM Mileage Mileage Public Works Make the Move Trainin LLC 19-10 $ 700.00 Bundles Training Fire Dept MBPTA 2020 $ 100.00 2020 Membership Dues - Debi Close Building Inspections Menards 27081 $ _8.99 Hardware - 6540 Greene Avenue _ Rental Properties Menards 27769 _ $ _ 40.39 Fire Department Supplies Fire Dept Menards _ 27896 $ _45.81 Repair Supplies - Unit #336 Street Dept Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0120HH01 $ 605.00 December Cleaning Service Gen Gov't Bldgs Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0120HH03 $ 500 00 December Cleaning Service Public Wo rk Post Restaurant & 10001 nnicknnick Supply L 397580 I� erInc U0201501 Total Claims for January 6, 2020 s Page 2 JOHI.'SON/TURNER LEGAL- December 11, 2019 City of Hugo Attn: Ron Min 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Dear Ron: Enclosed, please find our billing statements for the City of Hugo as of November 30, 2019. Below is a summary of the matter description, subtotal and total amount due and owing for the attached statements: MATTER MATTER I.D. SUBTOTAL Carpenter Property Purchase 12-2359-027 $1,295.25 Council Meetings 19-2359-052 $150.00 Deutsche Bank Litigation 17-2359-044 $13.50 General 2019 19-2359-053 $1,859.25 Peltier Matter 19-2359-054 12-2359-024 $211.50 $5,123.95 Prosecution TOTAL NOW DUE: $8,653.45 Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions regarding the billing statements. Sincerely, JOHNSON/T ER LEGAL 'David K. Snyder DKS/mah Enclosures 56 East Broadway Avenue, Suite 206, Forest Lake, MN 55025 / p 651.464.7292 / f 651.464.7348 Offices conveniently located throughout the metro area johnsonturner.com G.3 wsb November 21, 2019 Mr. Bryan Bear City Administrator City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: WSB 2020 Rate Schedule Dear Mr. Bear: Thank you for your partnership. WSB is grateful for our relationship with you, your team and community, and we look forward to supporting you as we work together to achieve your visions for the future. We are proud of the work we've accomplished with partners like you in 2019. As a firm, we continue to invest heavily in programs, services, and products that allow us to better serve our clients. We believe that culture drives results and we know that a strong culture is built on the staff we hire. We continue to invest in our staff and make strategic hires that help elevate our talent and in return, help us bring innovative and forward -thinking ideas to your community. We believe in technology and the role it plays and will play in the future. We continue to explore new technologies to deliver thoughtful, efficient, and creative solutions to your challenges. In the past year, we've developed applications, including WSB 360, SmartPix, and TrueView, that combine Artificial Intelligence, Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality, and GIS to solve complex problems. Additionally, our Datafi application is used to manage projects, create field inspections and run reports, and has had great success in improving efficiencies for clients. We are going to remain at the forefront of leveraging new technologies that are shaping our world. LO Enclosed is our 2020 Rate Schedule for our typical services for your information. We are committed to providing the highest quality services at a reasonable price. To that end, we have an average increase of 2.5% for our 2020 rates. We are invested in our clients, people, work, and the communities that we serve. Thank you again for the opportunity to work with you. Sincerely, WSB 0 0 N Mark A. Erichson, PE Principal Enclosure srb 2020 Rate Schedule ws b PRINCIPAL I ASSOCIATE Billing Rate/Hour $152 - $192 SR. PROJECT MANAGER I SR. PROJECT ENGINEER $152 - $192 PROJECT MANAGER PROJECT ENGINEER I GRADUATE ENGINEER ENGINEERING TECHNICIAN I ENGINEERING SPECIALIST $135 - $150 $90 - $146 $58 - $146 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT I SR. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT $70 - $150 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST I SR. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENTIST $58 - $146 PLANNER I SR. PLANNER $70 - $150 GIS SPECIALIST I SR. GIS SPECIALIST $70 - $150 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVER $95 - $120 SURVEY One -Person Crew $149 Two -Person Crew $196 Three -Person Crew $211 OFFICE TECHNICIAN $53 - $94 Costs associated with word processing, cell phones, reproduction of common correspondence, and mailing are included in the above hourly rates. Vehicle mileage is included in our billing rates [excluding geotechnical and construction materials testing (CMT) service rates]. Mileage can be charged separately, if specifically outlined by contract. I Reimbursable expenses include costs associated with plan, specification, and report reproduction; permit fees; delivery costs; etc. I Multiple rates illustrate the varying levels of experience within each category. I Rate Schedule is adjusted annually. • • L A N D F O R M From Site to Finish • • 105 South Fifth Avenue Tel: 612-252-9070 Suite513 Web: landform.net Minneapolis, MN 55401 December 11, 2019 Rachel Juba City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 RE: 2020 Rate Schedule Dear Ms. Juba, Thank you for utilizing Landform to provide planning services for the City. We appreciate your confidence in us and we value our working relationship with the City. We were pleased to be able work with you to complete the 2040 Comprehensive Plan update this year and look forward to working with you in 2020 to provide continued planning support. Landform has a full-time staff of professionals, all of whom are committed to providing services that are truly tailored to the communities we serve and helping our clients plan great places. I have attached our municipal rate schedule for 2020. We recognize that we all have budget constraints and this rate schedule allows us to be competitive with other firms and provide a comprehensive range of services through retention of our most talented employees. These rates will become effective on January 1, 2020 for hourly work performed by Landform on behalf of the City in 2020. We look forward to working with the City of Hugo in 2020 and the opportunity to continue to provide professional planning services to assist your staff. Landform is an interdisciplinary site design firm with a studio -based, client -centered practice. Our professional staff includes landscape architects, planners, urban designers, civil engineers and land surveyors. We offer you a SensiblyGreen® approach to your development challenges from Site to Finish°. If you have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to call me at 612.638.0225. Sincerely, Landform �c Kendra Lindahl, AICP Principal Planner 1"i'G MEMo P 'j' 9m Landform" and Site to Finish° are registered service marks of Landform Professional Services, LLG. u m 0 a •a�••• Say • L • 2020 Rate Schedule Professional Services Title Hourly Rates Senior Principal $215 Principal $175 Principal Planner* $139 Associate $145 Studio Lead $145 Project Lead/Senior Designer/Senior CAD Manager $140 Planning Lead/Senior Planner $135 Planner III/Designer III/Survey Technician III $103 Planner II/Designer II/Survey Technician II $85 Planner I/Designer I/Survey Technician 1 $75 Survey Lead $145 Senior Surveyor $134 Crew Chief $140 Survey Coordinator $106 Field Technician $62 Construction Administrator 111 $134 Construction Administrator 11 $96 Construction Administrator 1 $88 Accounting/Business/Office Lead $83 Office Coordinator $84 Administrative Assistant $64 *Reduced Principal Planner rate for Hugo • 1. Standard Internal reimbursable expenses associated with prints, plots, scanning and mileage are included in our hourly rates. Deliverable plots and prints will be charged at internal rate. 2. Internal reimbursable expenses are priced as follows: Mileage Based on IRS Requirements Plotting on Bond 0.50 per square foot Plotting on Vellum 1.10 per square foot Plotting on Mylar 2.75 per square foot Color Printing 1.00 for 8.5 x 11 2.50 for 8.5 x 14, 11 x 17 Foam core 25.00 per sheet Scanning 1.50 per scan CD/DVD/Thumb drive 10.00 per cd/DVD/thumb drive 4. External reimbursable expenses shall be billed at cost plus 15%. Rachel Juba December 11, 2019 4pms Publications 4779 Bloom Ave., White Bear Lake, MN 55110 • Phone: (651) 407-1200 • Fax: (651) 429-1242 December 3, 2019 Ms. Michele Lindau City Clerk City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue N. Hugo, MN 55038 Dear Michele: The Citizen wishes to be considered as your official newspaper for 2020. We meet all the legal publication requirements under state statutes. Our circulation is audited by Verified Audit Circulation, an independent firm. We prefer submittal of legal notices by mail, fax at (651) 429-1242, or e-mail to le als c�r�presspubs.com - clearly identify them as "Legal Notices." There will be a slight increase in the rate for your legal notices this year due to increased costs of health care and paper. We are asking for $11.75 per column inch, in 7 point type at 9 lines per inch. Our deadline for legal notices is every other Wednesday by 5:00 p.m. for the following Thursday's publication. A schedule will be provided if needed. We always try to accommodate a notice that would be submitted after deadline if we are advised by email and a phone call by the deadline. We look forward to the opportunity to serve you. We welcome any questions or concerns you may have. Sincerely, isa Graber Legal Notice Coordinator LG:ic Misc: Hugo-Citizen-2020.doc Your Best Source For Community Information www.presspubs.com White Bear Press • Vadnais Heights Press • Quad Community Press • Shoreview Press • The Citizen • The Lowdown • North Oaks News noinfo oressnubs.com news(dWressnubs.com circ(a)oressoubs.com marketinaOoressnubs.com artmananPrnnrPcsniihs rnm 4.11 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North, Hugo, MN55038 (651) 762-6300 • www.ci.hugo.mn.us TO: Honorable Mayor Tom Weidt and Members of the City Council FROM: Ron Otkin, Finance Director SUBJECT: Resolution Not to Waive Statutory Tort Liability Limits DATE: For the City Council Meeting of January 6, 2020 DESIRED COUNCIL ACTION Adoption of Resolution Not to Waive Statutory Tort Liability Limits HISTORY In the late 1990's the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT) required each city that obtained liability coverage from them to decide whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. At that time the City Council opted not to waive the statutory limits. LIABILITY IN EXCESS OF THE STATUTORY LIMITS The City of Hugo does purchase $1 million in excess of the statutory limits because the tort limits either do not or may not apply to the following types of claims: *Claims under federal civil rights laws. *Claims for tort liability that the city has assumed by contract. *Claims for actions in another state. *Claims based on liquor sales. *Claims based on a "taking" theory. Excess liability coverage is important to a small city. If a city ends up with more liability than it has coverage, the city will have to either draw on existing funds or go to its taxpayers to pay that judgment. REQUIREMENT TO WAIVE OR NOT TO WAIVE STATUTORY LIMITS Because the City purchases liability insurance in excess of statutory limits, LMCIT requires the City Council to decide whether or not to waive the statutory limits for those claims that are subject to such limits. Passage of a resolution not to waive the statutory limits provides a written record that the excess liability coverage will only apply to claims that are not subject to tort limits. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the City Council pass a Resolution Not to Waive the Statutory Tort Liability Limits. ATTACHMENTS Resolution Not to Waive the Statutory Tort Liability Limits RESOLUTION NO.2020 - A RESOLUTION NOT TO WAIVE STATUTORY TORT LIABILITY LIMITS WHEREAS, cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust must decide whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. WHEREAS, statutory tort liability limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city purchases optional excess liability coverage. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUGO: 1. The City of Hugo does not waive the statutory tort liability limits. 2. Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected by this decision. Council members voting AYE: Council members voting NAY: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted this 6a' day of January, 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk CONTRACT FOR ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES This Agreement, entered into this day of 2020, by and between the City of Hugo, 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North, Hugo, MN 55038, hereinafter referred to as the "Municipality", and Otter Lake Animal Care Center, 6848 Otter Lake Road, Hugo, Minnesota 55038, hereinafter referred to as "Otter Lake" regarding the provision of animal control services in the City of Hugo. The parties hereto agree as follows: I. TERM The term of this contract shall be from January 1, 2020 through December 31, 2020 II. BASIC SERVICES Otter Lake agrees to provide the following services: 1. Shelter for animals on a 24 hour basis for the City of Hugo 2. Animal examinations and veterinary care as required whenever staff is available. 3. Boarding for up to ten (10) days. 4. Euthanasia and disposal of animals if required. 5. Assist in handling animal abuse/neglect cases in cooperation with Municipal officials when necessary III. COMPENSATION 1. Unclaimed Animals — Charges to be paid to Otter Lake by the City of Hugo • $8.00 Admin Fee • $20.00 Daily Boarding fee (up to ten days) • $100.00 Maximum for statutory veterinary services • $25.00 Euthanasia and Disposal Fee • $55.00 Cremation • $50.00 Relocation of animal 2. Claimed Animals — Charges to be paid to Otter Lake by the animal owner • $8.00 Admin Fee • $20.00 Daily Boarding fee (up to ten days) • Actual cost for veterinary services • $150.00 City of Hugo Impound Fee 3. Claimed Animals — Charges to be reimbursed to City of Hugo by Otter Lake 0 $100.00 City of Hugo Impound Fee 4. The Municipality will not be charged those costs recovered from pet owners. 5. Charges for services, shall be paid monthly or within thirty (30) days after submission of the monthly claims by Otter Lake to the Municipality. A copy of the impound sheet(s) shall accompany the monthly claims. IV. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS In providing all services pursuant to this contract, Otter Lake Shall abide by all statutes, ordinances rules and regulations pertaining to or regulating the provision of such services, including those now in effect and hereinafter adopted. Otter Lake shall comply with all requirements of Minn. Stat. 346.37 and shall indemnify and defendant the City against any claimed violation of that statute, or any other statue, ordinance, rule or regulation pertaining to the services provided by Otter Lake. V. AUDIT DISCLOSURE AND RETENTION OF RECORDS Otter Lake agrees to make available to duly authorized representative of the Municipality and either the legislative auditor or the state auditor for the purpose to audit any books, documents, papers and records of Otter Lake that are pertinent to Otter Lake's provision of services hereunder. Otter Lake further agrees to maintain all such required records for three (3) years after receipt of final payment and the closing of all other related matters. VI. INSURANCE Otter Lake shall purchase, maintain in full force and effect during the term of this Contract the following insurance coverage: 1. WORKERS' COMPENSATION: Coverage at statutory limits as provided by the State of Minnesota. 2. COMPREHENSIVE GENERAL LIABILITY: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $1,000,000 per occurrence, combined single limit for bodily injury liability and property damage liability. 3. BUSINESS AUTO LIABILITY: Coverage shall have minimum limits of $750,000 per occurrence, combined single limit of bodily injury liability and property damage liability. This shall include owned vehicles hired and non -owned vehicles and employee non - ownership. VII. TERMINATION This Contract maybe terminated by eitherparty,with orwithout cause, uponthirty (3 0) days written notice, deliveredbycertifiedmailorin person, to the otherparty. VIII. MODIFICATIONS Any material alteration, modifications or variations of any terms of the Contract shall be valid and enforceable only when they have been reduced to writing as an amendments and signed by the parties. IX. ENTIRE AGREEMENT Itis understood and agreed by the partied that the entire agreement of the parties is contained herein and that the Contract superseded all oral agreements and negotiations between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof as well as any previous agreements presently in effect between Otter Lake and Municipality. The parties hereto revoke any prior oral or written agreements between themselves and agree that this Contract is the only and complete agreement regarding the subject hereof. CITY OF HUGO OTTER LAKE ANIMAL CARE CENTER By: By: Title: Title: Administration of the State Building Code Agreement Between City of Hugo and City of Scandia WHEREAS, the City of Scandia (hereinafter "City" or "City of Scandia") has adopted the Minnesota State Building Code; and WHEREAS, the City is authorized and empowered to provide for plan review and various types of inspections to ensure public health, safety and welfare of its citizens; and WHEREAS, said building code requires a certified building official for the implementation of the state building code; and WHEREAS, the City has investigated the facts and determined that it is in the best interest of the City and its citizens to contract with the City of Hugo for administration of the state building code; and WHEREAS, the City of Scandia desires that the City of Hugo provide said plan review and inspections within the City of Scandia at such times that are required; and WHEREAS, the City of Scandia desires that the City of Hugo Building Department, which verifies that it has a certified building official, implement and enforce the Minnesota State Building Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Hugo is willing, able and hereby commits itself to the implementation of said building code for the City during such times as requested by the City of Scandia until further notice; NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants of each to the other contained in this Agreement, the City of Scandia and the City of Hugo, pursuant to the authority contained in Minn. Stat. § 471.59, in order to accomplish the foregoing purposes, agree as follows: ARTICLE I THE AGREEMENT Section 1.01. Purposes. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the exchange of certain services as provided in the recitals, which shall be incorporated herein, between the City of Hugo and City of Scandia for building inspection and plan review services. Section 1.02. Cooperation. The Parties shall cooperate and use their best efforts to ensure the most effective implementation of the various provisions of this Agreement. The Parties agree in good faith to undertake resolution of disputes, if any, in an equitable and timely manner. Building Inspection Agreement — City of Scandia and City of Hugo Page 2 of 5 Section 1.03. Term. The term of this Agreement shall be for a period commencing the date hereof shall remain in place and in effect until and unless terminated by mutual agreement or by one of the Parties hereto. Section 104. Termination by 'One Party:. A Party's termination of this Agreement shall be effective 21 days after such Party's delivery in writing of a notice of termination to the City of Scandia City Administrator or the City of Hugo City Administrator, as the case may be. ARTICLE II THE CITY'S RIGHTS AND OBLIGATIONS Section 2.01. Plan Review and Inspections. The City Hugo shall perform plan review and inspections for public and private buildings and state licensed facilities required intermittently and at the request of the City of Scandia. The City of Hugo shall not be obligated to review, approve or deny any zoning, site design, setback, road access, or sewer and water hook-ups, and/or collect fees for the same. Section 2.02. Fee for Inspections. In exchange for the services the City of Hugo performs pursuant to Section 2.01 of this Agreement, the City of Scandia shall pay the City of Hugo an hourly rate per the City's adopted fee schedule, which shall be incorporated herein, as Exhibit A, as said schedule may change from time to time. Section 2.03. Fee for Plan Review Services. In exchange for the plan review services the City of Hugo performs pursuant to Section 2.01 of this Agreement, the City of Scandia shall pay the City of Hugo the entire plan review fee collected by the City of Scandia as required by the City of Scandia adopted building code. ARTICLE III GENERAL PROVISIONS Section 4.01. Notices, Except as provided in Section 1.04 of this Agreement, all notices or communications required or permitted pursuant to this Agreement shall be either hand delivered or mailed to the Parties, certified mail, return -receipt requested, at the following addresses: City of Hugo: City Clerk City of Hugo 14669 Fitzergald Avenue North Hugo, Minnesota 55038 2 Building Inspection Agreement — City of Scandia and City of Hugo Page 3 of 5 City of Scandia: City Clerk City of Scandia 14727 20911 St. N Scandia, Minnesota 77073 Each Party may change its address or authorized representative by written notice delivered to the other Party pursuant to this Section 4.01. Section 4.02. Countemarts: This Agreement may be executed in more than one counterpart, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which taken together shall be deemed a single instrument. Section 4.03. Non-As*,nabilily. Neither of the Parties shall assign any interest in this Agreement nor shall transfer any interest in the same, whether by subcontract, assignment, or novation, without the prior written consent of the other Party. Such consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Section 4.04. Alteration. Any alteration, variation, modification, or waiver of the provisions of the Agreement shall be valid only after it has been reduced to writing and duly signed by all Parties. Section 4.05. Indemnification and Insurance. (1) Unless otherwise provided for in this Agreement, each Party shall be separately responsible for its own expenditures of funds made under this agreement. (2) Subject to the exclusion contained at Paragraph (1) of this Section, the Parties' total liability under this Agreement shall be governed by Minn. Stat. § 471.59, subd. la. Each Party agrees that it will be responsible for the acts or omissions of its officials, agents, and employees, and the results thereof, in carrying out the terms of this Agreement, to the extent authorized by law and shall not be responsible for the acts/omissions of the other Parties and the results thereof. For purposes of determining total 3 Building Inspection Agreement — City of Scandia and City of Hugo Page 4 of 5 liability for damages, the participating governmental units are considered to be a single governmental unit, the total liability of which shall not exceed the limits for a single governmental unit as provided in Minn. Stat. § 466.04, subd. 1. (3) Each Party agrees to defend, hold harmless, and indemnify other Parties, their officials, agents and employees, from any liability, Ioss or damages any other Party may suffer or incur as a result of demands, claims, judgments, or costs arising out of or caused by the indemnifying Parry's negligence in the performance of its respective obligations under this Agreement. This provision shall not be construed nor operate as a waiver of any applicable limitation of liability, defenses, immunities, or exceptions by statute or common law. (4) Each Participating Party shall be responsible for injuries or death of its own Employees to the extent required by law. Each Participating Party will maintain workers' compensation insurance or self-insurance coverage, covering its own Employees while they are providing assistance pursuant to this Agreement. Section 4.06. Severability,. The provisions of this Agreement are severable. If any paragraph, section, subdivision, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Agreement is for any reason held to be contrary to law, or contrary to any rule or regulation having the force and effect of law, such decision shall not affect the remaining portions of this Agreement. Section 4.07. Interpretation Accordine to Minnesota. Law. This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed according to the laws of the State of Minnesota. Section 4.08. Entire Agreement. This Agreement shall constitute the entire agreement between the Parties and shall supersede all prior oral or written negotiations, and shall supersede all prior written agreements for the subject matter of this Agreement. Section 4.09. Headings. The headings to the various sections of this Agreement are inserted only for convenience of reference and are not intended, nor shall they be construed, to modify, define, limit, or expand the intent of the Parties as expressed in this Agreement. Section 4.10. Further Actions. The Parties agree to execute such further documents and take such further actions as may reasonably be required or expedient to carry out the provisions and intentions of this Agreement, or any agreement or document relating hereto or entered into in connection herewith. Section 4.11. Parties in Interest. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure solely to the benefit of the Parties hereto and their permitted assigns, and nothing in this 4 Building Inspection Agreement — City of Scandia and City of Hugo Page 5 of 5 Agreement, express or implied, is intended to confer upon any other person any rights or remedies of any nature under or by reason of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Parties have caused this Agreement to be executed by their duly authorized representative as of the day and year first above written. Adopted and approved by the City Council of Hugo on the day of 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Adopted by the City of Scandia on the 1�'� day of pe CAW&r 2019. Christine Maefsky, Mayor r ATTEST: ��'496**40� Kenneth Cam i eri, City Administrator Exhibit A Building Inspection Fee $60.00/hour Mileage Rate $0.58/mile Agenda Item: CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant SUBJECT: Jeff Penton and Shirley E. Nelson -Hill Revocable Trust. Conditional use permit request for a shared driveway on properties generally located north of 122" d Street North and west of Keller Avenue North. DATE: December 30, 2019 for the City Council Meeting on January 6, 2020. ZONING: Agricultural (AG) REVIEW DEADLINE: March 4, 2020 1. PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE: At its December 19, 2019 regularly scheduled meeting, the Hugo Planning Commission considered the conditional use permit application submitted by Jeff Penton and Shirley E. Nelson - Hill Revocable Trust and held a public hearing. No one spoke at the public hearing. Staff provided background and recommended approval of the request. The Planning Commission agreed that the request met the criteria necessary to approve the application and recommended approval of the conditional use permit request to the City Council. 2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for a shared driveway between two parcels. The applicant's property is currently landlocked and they are requesting access to Keller Avenue North through a neighboring parcel to the south. Both property owners have signed an easement and maintenance agreement. 3. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The properties are zoned Agricultural (AG) and are determined as Agricultural in the 2040 Land Use Plan. Both properties are over 10 acres and are currently vacant. The surrounding properties are also zoned AG and are large lots that are either vacant or occupied by single family homes. Penton and Trust Shared Driveway CUP Page 2 B. Natural Characteristics of Site The northern portion of the property has shore front along South School Section Lake with a mix of varied vegetation and wetland. The other property has a portion of wetland on site. Both parcels are rented out for farming and are used for agricultural purposes. 4. LEVEL OF DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or not the proposed application meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the conditional use permit. 5. ANALYSIS: A. Consistency with Ordinance Standards The existing, vacant 18.56 acre parcel is a landlocked parcel with no established driveway or access to a public road. Currently, access to the site is through a neighboring parcel to the south, which has frontage on Keller Avenue North. No driveway is currently constructed on either site. A CUP is required for a driveway if it is shared by two or more separate parcels or lots of land. Staff used these standards to review the application and found that the request meets all applicable standards as follows: 1. The proposed use is permissible by law. The proposed use is allowed by conditional use permit. 2. The proposed use is keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The proposed use is allowed in the AG zoning district and will keep with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, which is intended to allow a shared driveway by a CUP as long as they comply with the regulations. 3. The proposed use is compatible with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the character of the surrounding area. The use is existing and is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and the addition will not alter the character of the area. There are shared driveways in the area that provide access to land locked parcels. 4. The proposed use has adequate drainage, water supply, electrical, gas, and sewage treatment facilities. The proposed use has adequate drainage, water supply, and utilities. A driveway permit will be required and a culvert may be needed for drainage. Staff will evaluate the drainage at the time a permit application is submitted. Penton and Trust Shared Driveway CUP Page 3 5. The proposed use has adequate road access. The property will have adequate road access to Keller Avenue North. 6. Technical Evaluation of Floodplain. The applicant is not proposing to impact any floodplain. 7. The proposed use should not increase the potential for flood damage. The proposed use would not obstruct the floodplain or increase the potential for flooding. 8. The proposed use will not damage or reduce the benefits the public receives from public waters. The proposed use would not damage or reduce the benefits from any public waters. 9. The use of watercraft on public waters. The proposed use would not involve the use of watercraft on public waters. 10. All structures shall be screened from view of public waters. The proposed use is not visible from public waters. 11. Wetland impacts. Prior to the issuance of a driveway permit, a wetland delineation shall be reviewed and approved by staff. At the time a driveway is established, no wetlands shall be impacted. 12. All state and local permits shall be acquired for the conditional use. The applicant would be responsible for obtaining all state and local permits. 13. Adequate screening and buffering from non -compatible uses and public rights -of -way. The proposed use is not visible from non -compatible uses and public right-of-ways. It's in staff s opinion that the request meets all the items required to approve a CUP. It is a condition of approval that the easement area and maintenance agreement will need to be reviewed and approved for the existing driveway. The applicant shall also be required to obtain a permit before the driveway is constructed. 6. CONCLUSION/ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It's in staff s opinion that the request meets all the items required for conditional use permit. Staff recommends approval of the shared driveway CUP subject to the conditions listed in the attached draft resolution to the Planning Commission. Penton and Trust Shared Driveway CUP Page 4 7. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission agreed that the request met the criteria necessary to approve the conditional use permit request and recommended approval of the draft conditional use permit and resolution subject to the conditions listed to the City Council. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Approving Resolution 3. Conditional Use Permit 4. Survey r`3 ON ,l�CITTY OF^ iiV� EST. 1908 � w 47 r ' a ' w; r a- ti. (y 1 RWI � ,.. 4 !• ,� I ICI �� rv3.. TJ �P �.I. { • .,� 'i�$Y�Na�nl:` Jae a�'�4�4 .a:if'r ,' v }'�fibi�A` �= k� ! �2'�:CA9_`WA:•..�..y.......r.JblCf:.:LSyye�.- ..........F'^Pi.d. .'..'�"ia ��.. »Lr35 ri� Penton Shared Driveway CUP Location Map Hugo, MN Subject Properties Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary N 0 500 Feet 1 in = 500 feet RESOLUTION 2020-XX APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SHARED DRIVEWAY FOR THE PROPERTIES GENERALY LOCATED NORTH OF 122ND STREET NORTH AND WEST OF JODY AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, Jeff Penton and Shirley E. Nelson -Hill Revocable Trust have requested approval of a conditional use permit to allow a shared driveway for the properties generally located north of 122nd Street North and west of Jody Avenue North. WHEREAS, the subject properties are legally described as follows: (See attached) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said conditional use permit at a duly called public hearing on December 19, 2019, and recommends approval subject to the conditions listed in the conditional use permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the conditional use permit for a shared driveway on properties located generally located north of 122" d Street North and west of Jody Avenue North subject to the following conditions; 1. The Easement and Maintenance Agreement for the shared driveway shall be recorded at Washington County. 2. The applicant will be required to a wetland delineation for both properties. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6d' day of January 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk EXHIBIT A The Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter (SW 1/4 NE 1/4), Section 36, Township 31, Range 21, except those portions previously conveyed. Previously conveyed parcels are described in doc. No 3477802 as: All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County Minnesota that is described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner on the Northeast 1/4 of Section 36; thence South 0°31'04" East, on a assumed bearing, along the East line of said Northeast 1/4 for a distance of 1042.90 feet; thence North 60°22'04" West a distance of 527.15 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described, said point of beginning also being the centerline of Keller Avenue (County Road No. 57) as improved; thence continuing North 60°22'04" West a distance of 992.46 feet; thence South 21°52'12" West a distance of 1131.06 feet; thence South 89010'58" thence West, a distance of 228.74 feet to the Northwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 36; thence South 0022'46" East, along the West line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a distance of 593.90 feet; thence North 89°10'58" East, parallel the South line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, a distance of 700.29 feet to the centerline of said Keller Avenue; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a non - tangential curve concave to the East and having a central angle of 1°25'21" with a radius of 763.74 feet for an arc distance of 18.96 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 11050'07" East; thence North 12032'47" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 311.51 feet; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Southeast and having a central angle of 35005'49" with a radius of 533.32 feet for an arc distance of 326.69 feet; thence North 47°38'36" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 603.07 feet; thence Northeast along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Northwest and having a central angle of 8035'50" with a radius of 1256.36 feet for an arc distance of 189.61 feet to the point of beginning. And described in doc. No 465812 as: The South 662 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota EXHIBIT B Government Lot 2, Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, together with a perpetual easement over, under and across the following described property: North half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota lying East of a line 66 feet West and parallel to the West line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 36; Excepted from the above conveyance the following described property: All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner on the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 36; thence south 0°31'04" East, on an assumed bearing, along the East line of said Northeast 1/4 for a distance of 1042.90 feet; thence North 60°22'04" West a distance of 527.15 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described, said point of beginning also being the centerline of Keller Avenue (County Road No. 57) as improved; thence continuing North 60°22'04" West a distance of 992.46 feet; thence South 21°52'12" West a distance of 1131.06 feet; thence South 89°10'58" West, a distance of 228.74 feet to the Northwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 36; thence South 0°22'46" East, along the West line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, a distance of 593.90 feet; thence North 89°10'58" East, parallel with the South line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, a distance of 700.29 feet to the centerline of said Keller Avenue; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a nontangential curve concave to the East and having a central angle of 1°25'21" with a radius of 763.71 feet for an arc distance of 18.96 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 11°50'07" East; thence North 12°32'47" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 311.51 feet; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Southeast and having a central angle of 35*05'49" with a radius of 533.32 feet for an arc distance of 326.69 feet; thence North 47°38'36" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 326.69 feet; thence North 47°38'36" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 603.07 feet; thence Northeast along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Northwest and having a central angle of 8°35'50" with a radius of 1256.36 feet for an arc distance of 189.61 feet to the point of beginning; and Except That part of Government Lot Seven (7) in Section Twenty-five (25) and Government Lot Two (2) in Section Thirty-six (36), all in said Township Thirty-one (31) North, of Range Twenty-one (21) West, Washington County, Minnesota, described jointly as follows: Beginning at the north quarter corner of said Section Thirty-six (36); thence 179°39'59 assumed azimuth from North along the north -south quarter line of said Section Thirty-six (36), a distance of Five Hundred and One Hundredth (500.01) feet; thence 77049'50" to the shoreline of South School Section Lake, thence northwesterly; northerly and westerly along said shoreline to the point of intersection with a straight line drawn between the north and south quarter corners of said Section Twenty-five (25); thence southerly along said straight line to the point of beginning. Subject to County State Aid Highway No. 8A (also known as 1301h Street North and Jody Avenue North). Subject to and together with any other valid easements, restrictions and reservations. According to the United States Government Survey thereof. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DATE OF APPROVAL: January 6, 2020 OWNERS: Jeff and Kelly Penton Shirley E. Nelson -Hill Revocable Trust LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS FOR WHICH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS GRANTED: (See attached) ZONING DISTRICT: Agricultural THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWS FOR THE FOLLOWING: A shared driveway for properties located generally north of 122nd Street North and west of Jody Avenue North are subject to the following conditions: Prior to issuance of a driveway or building permit: 1. A wetland delineation will be required for both properties. 2. The Easement and Maintenance Agreement shall be reviewed and approved by staff. The applicant shall record the Easement and Maintenance Agreement at Washington County once it is approved by City staff. 3. The applicant will need to demonstrate that the area of the proposed shared driveway will not impact any wetlands. If wetlands are proposed to be impacted the applicant shall move the location of the driveway so there would not be impact or acquire the proper permits for impacting a wetland. Tom Weidt, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this day of , 2020, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Tom Weidt Mayor of the City of Hugo, a Minnesota municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Hugo by the authority of the City Council of the City of Hugo, and Tom Weidt acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City of Hugo. Notary Public Jeff Penton Kelly Penton STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this day of , 2020, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared Jeff and Kelly Penton, husband and wife, to me known as the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, who stated that they are the owners of the property this permit applies to, and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public Trustee, Shirley E. Nelson -Hill Revocable Trust STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this day of , 2020, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared , Trustee of the Shirley E. Nelson -Hill Revocable Trust, to me known as the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, who stated that they are the owners of the property this permit applies to, and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT WAS DRAFTED BY THE CITY OF HUGO 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 EXHIBIT A The Southwest quarter of the Northeast quarter (SW 1/4 NE 1/4), Section 36, Township 31, Range 21, except those portions previously conveyed. Previously conveyed parcels are described in doc. No 3477802 as: All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County Minnesota that is described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner on the Northeast 1/4 of Section 36; thence South 0°31'04" East, on a assumed bearing, along the East line of said Northeast 1/4 for a distance of 1042.90 feet; thence North 60°22'04" West a distance of 527.15 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described, said point of beginning also being the centerline of Keller Avenue (County Road No. 57) as improved; thence continuing North 60°22'04" West a distance of 992.46 feet; thence South 21°52'12" West a distance of 1131.06 feet; thence South 89010'58" thence West, a distance of 228.74 feet to the Northwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 36; thence South 0022'46" East, along the West line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 a distance of 593.90 feet; thence North 89°10'58" East, parallel the South line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, a distance of 700.29 feet to the centerline of said Keller Avenue; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a non - tangential curve concave to the East and having a central angle of 1°25'21" with a radius of 763.74 feet for an arc distance of 18.96 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 11050'07" East; thence North 12032'47" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 311.51 feet; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Southeast and having a central angle of 35005'49" with a radius of 533.32 feet for an arc distance of 326.69 feet; thence North 47°38'36" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 603.07 feet; thence Northeast along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Northwest and having a central angle of 8035'50" with a radius of 1256.36 feet for an arc distance of 189.61 feet to the point of beginning. And described in doc. No 465812 as: The South 662 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota EXHIBIT B Government Lot 2, Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, together with a perpetual easement over, under and across the following described property: North half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota lying East of a line 66 feet West and parallel to the West line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 36; Excepted from the above conveyance the following described property: All that part of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner on the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 36; thence south 0°31'04" East, on an assumed bearing, along the East line of said Northeast 1/4 for a distance of 1042.90 feet; thence North 60°22'04" West a distance of 527.15 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described, said point of beginning also being the centerline of Keller Avenue (County Road No. 57) as improved; thence continuing North 60°22'04" West a distance of 992.46 feet; thence South 21°52'12" West a distance of 1131.06 feet; thence South 89°10'58" West, a distance of 228.74 feet to the Northwest corner of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 36; thence South 0°22'46" East, along the West line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, a distance of 593.90 feet; thence North 89°10'58" East, parallel with the South line of said Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, a distance of 700.29 feet to the centerline of said Keller Avenue; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a nontangential curve concave to the East and having a central angle of 1°25'21" with a radius of 763.71 feet for an arc distance of 18.96 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 11°50'07" East; thence North 12°32'47" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 311.51 feet; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Southeast and having a central angle of 35*05'49" with a radius of 533.32 feet for an arc distance of 326.69 feet; thence North 47°38'36" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 326.69 feet; thence North 47°38'36" East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 603.07 feet; thence Northeast along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Northwest and having a central angle of 8°35'50" with a radius of 1256.36 feet for an arc distance of 189.61 feet to the point of beginning; and Except That part of Government Lot Seven (7) in Section Twenty-five (25) and Government Lot Two (2) in Section Thirty-six (36), all in said Township Thirty-one (31) North, of Range Twenty-one (21) West, Washington County, Minnesota, described jointly as follows: Beginning at the north quarter corner of said Section Thirty-six (36); thence 179°39'59 assumed azimuth from North along the north -south quarter line of said Section Thirty-six (36), a distance of Five Hundred and One Hundredth (500.01) feet; thence 77049'50" to the shoreline of South School Section Lake, thence northwesterly; northerly and westerly along said shoreline to the point of intersection with a straight line drawn between the north and south quarter corners of said Section Twenty-five (25); thence southerly along said straight line to the point of beginning. Subject to County State Aid Highway No. 8A (also known as 1301h Street North and Jody Avenue North). Subject to and together with any other valid easements, restrictions and reservations. According to the United States Government Survey thereof. SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION Pwforpw SHIRLEY NELSON AND JEFF PENTON LEGEND DENOTES PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT ■ NORTH 7 1_J 5 111 Professional Land Surveyors www.egrudxom 6,776 Lake Drive N E, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (PER DOCUMENT NO. 3477802) The Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota, except those portions previously conveyed. (Previously conveyed parcels are described in doc. no. 3477802 as: All that part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County Minnesota that is described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner on the Northeast Quarter of Sect ?9 5 gth�nce South 00 degrees 31 minutes 04 seconds East, on a assumed bearing, along the East line of said Northeast Quarter for a distance of 1042.90 feet; thence North 60 degrVe� �eminutes 04 seconds West a distance of 527.15 feet to the point of beginning of the land to be described, said point of beginning also being the centerline of Keller Avenue (County Road No. 57) as improved; thence continuing North 60 degrees 22 minutes 04 seconds West a distance of 992.46 feet; thence South 21 degrees 52 minutes 12 seconds West a distance of 1131.06 feet; thence South 89 degrees 10 minutes 58 seconds West, a distance of 228.74 feet to the Northwest corner of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 36; thence South 00 degrees 22 minutes 46 seconds East, along the West line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 593.90 feet; thence North 89 degrees 10 minutes 58 seconds East, parallel the South line of said Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, a distance of 700.29 feet to the centerline of said Keller Avenue; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a non —tangential curve concave to the East and having a central angle of 01 degree 25 minutes 21 seconds with a radius of 763.71 feet for an arc distance of 18.96 feet, the chord of said curve bears North 11 degrees 50 minutes 07 seconds East; thence North 12 degrees 32 minutes 47 seconds East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 311.51 feet; thence Northeasterly along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Southeast and having a central angle of 35 degrees 05 minutes 49 seconds with a radius of 533.32 feet for an arc distance of 326.69 feet; thence North 47 degrees 38 minutes 36 seconds East, along said centerline tangent to last said curve a distance of 603.07 feet; thence Northeast along said centerline on a tangential curve concave to the Northwest and having a central angle of 08 degrees 35 minutes 50 seconds with a radius of 1256.36 feet for an arc distance of 189.61 feet to the point of beginning. And described in doc. no. 465812 as: The South 662 feet of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota. N89057'93" lY 657.92 NORTH LINE OF THE NW 1/4 OF THE --- i SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 36 i i PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT DESCRIPTION: A perpetual access easement over under and across the following described property: North half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 36, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota lying East of a line 66 feet West and parallel to the West line of the Northeast Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of said Section 36, except those previously conveyed parcels conveyed per document numbers 3477802 and 465812. \`J X r I I c \ � \� o \ C , (-\ � \_1 I � � r I r _ 1 1 I � � r I GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 200 ( IN FEET ) 1 inch = 50 ft. ■ 66.00 I NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 36 I I I 11 .. ■ �v \ r^\ \ 1 1 r I \ I ■ ■ r I r- _1 I w w Z O w w = I z� J Li I 0 w ;I -(CONVEYED PER DOC NO. 3477802) I I I I I� PROPOSED ACCESS EASEMENT I I I I ` 66 I \ I I I I I 1316.88 N89057'52"E MIITFQ ■ ■ <�■ � v r�\ \ 1 1 I r LINE PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF '\ THE NE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE S'89059'56"E�\ NE 1/4 OF SEC. 36 658.39 \�► --NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 662 FEET OF �\ THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 36 724.44 ------- / SOUTH LINE OF THE NE 1/2 OF THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SEC. 36 — No Field survey was completed for the preparation of this drawing. — Bearings shown are on Washington County datum. — This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and/or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or an attorney's title opinion. I I rn (CONVEYED PER DOC NO. 465812) O N O 0 1 hereby certify that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I om o duly Registered Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. RICHARD L. OLSON Date: License No. 45770 I / I I / I , / / / / l� / / I / / I I I / h6 M U w % / / N O I / w z w / I � I I O / I / � z J I I / l I ' Q w I O IT ' Q ' I I � I I�I I -- ----- II 3 I I i / / 1 / / / / / �m / / r � 09023 S&L Agenda Item: CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant SUBJECT: Ed Tschida. Zoning amendment request to rezone from the Long Term Agricultural Zoning District to the Agricultural Zoning District for the property located at 9822 152" d Street North. DATE: December 30, 2019 for the City Council Meeting on January 6, 2020. ZONING: Long Term Agricultural District (LA) REVIEW DEADLINE: February 27, 2020 1. PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE: At its December 19, 2019 regularly scheduled meeting, the Hugo Planning Commission considered the zoning amendment request to rezone from the Long Term Agricultural Zoning District to the Agricultural Zoning District submitted by Ed Tschida and held a public hearing. No one came forward at the public hearing. Staff provided background and recommended approval of the request. The Planning Commission agreed that the request met the criteria necessary to approve the application and recommended approval of the zoning amendment to the City Council. 2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: Ed Tschida is requesting to rezone his property from the Long Term Agricultural Zoning District to the Agricultural Zoning District. 3. BACKGROUND: The Minnesota Agricultural Land Preservation Program was established in 1984, which consists of tools for agricultural land preservation at the local level. The program provides tax relief to agricultural land within the conservation program. State statute requires the property enrolled in this program to be zoned Long Term Agricultural. It also requires the property to remain within the conservation program for eight years. After the eight years, the property owner may request to leave the program. Tschida Zoning Amendment Page 2 In 2003, Ed Tschida was approved for a zoning amendment from the Agricultural Zoning District to the Long Term Agricultural Zoning District and entered into the Minnesota Agricultural Land Preservation Program. Since gaining ownership of his property, Tschida has planted thousands of trees and has created a forest of mostly White Pine, Norway Pine, White Spruce, Oak, Birch, and Aspen trees. The forest combined with the existing wetland on site has created a natural habitat for many species of wildlife. Tschida would now like to enter into a more permanent, long-term conservation program that is offered through the Minnesota Land Trust. By entering into this program, the property will be under a conservation easement that will limit development on the property. Ed Tschida is requesting the Hugo City Council to approve the rezoning of his property from the Long Term Agricultural Zoning District to the Agricultural Zoning District. Should the zoning amendment be approved, the City will sign off on the request submitted by the landowner for termination of the current agricultural preserve program. 4. LEVEL OF DISCRETION IN DECISION MAKING: The City has discretion in approving or denying rezoning applications, based on whether or not the proposal meets the standards outlined in the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. If the City finds that all the applicable standards are met, the rezoning application must be approved. However, if the City finds that any of the applicable standards are not met, the application may be denied. 5. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The subject property is zoned Long Term Agriculture (LA) and the land use is identified as Agricultural. The property to the east is also zoned LA and the properties to the north, west, and south are zoned Agricultural (AG). All surrounding properties are identified as Agricultural in the 2040 Land Use Plan. B. Natural Characteristics of Site The 79.52 acre site has a single family home and one accessory structure located on it. The rest of the property is a mix of wetland and natural vegetation. Tschida has stated that he has planted 4,000 to 5,000 trees over the course of 15 years to include White Pine, Norway Pine, White Spruce, Oak, Birch, and Aspen trees. 6. ANALYSIS: Staff has analyzed this rezoning based on the four criteria in the City ordinance under Section 90- 40, Zoning Amendments: 1. The requested amendment is in compliance with the City s Comprehensive Plan. The City's Comprehensive Plan identifies the subject property as agricultural. The requested amendment would not change the land use of the property. The property is Tschida Zoning Amendment Page 3 located in the east part of the City, which is planned for agricultural and rural residential uses. 2. The proposed zoning classification is appropriate for the property given the topographic, environmental and cultural limitations of the site. The property consists of a single family home and primarily natural vegetation and wetlands. While the property is not used for traditional agricultural pursuits, is does contain high quality natural areas and trees. The Agricultural zoning would be an appropriate for the property. 3. Existing public infrastructure is adequate to handle the development that can reasonable be foreseen on the site. The property is served by well and septic. Municipal sewer and water is not available to this area of the City. By changing the zoning from LA to AG, the minimum lot size would change from 40 acres to 10 acres. Because the subject property does not have frontage on a public road, any splitting of the property would require a variance. No development is proposed on the site and because the applicant's intent is to further preserve the property by entering into the Minnesota Land Trust Metro Habitat Protection Program, the existing access to the property is adequate. 4. The proposed zoning classification will not have unreasonable negative impacts on adjacent properties. The rezoning will not negatively impact the adjacent properties. The property will remain in agricultural and open space uses consistent with other properties in the zoning district. 5. The floodplain designation on the official zoning map shall not be removed from floodplain areas unless it can be shown that the designation is in error or that the area has been filled to or above the elevation of the regulatory flood protection elevation and is contiguous to lands outside the floodplain. The floodplain areas are not proposed to be impacted. 7. CONCLUSION/ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds the application meets the criteria outlined in the City Code and recommends approval of the zoning amendment request to rezone from the Long Term Agricultural Zoning District to the Agricultural Zoning District for the property located at 9822 152nd Street North. 7. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission agreed that the request met the criteria necessary to approve the zoning amendment and recommended approval of the ordinance for rezoning to the City Council. Tschida Zoning Amendment Page 4 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Ordinance for Rezoning 3. Applicant Narrative CI-FY OF EST. 19OG UL, v t�041 IJ -j 9822 152nd Street North Zoning Amendment Location Map Hugo, MN Subject Property Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary N 0 800 Feet 1 in = 800 feet ORDINANCE 2020-XXX CITY OF HUGO AN ORDINANCE WITHIN THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA AMENDING CHAPTER 90 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LANDS LOCATED 9822 152ND STREET NORTH THE CITY OF HUGO ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Chapter 90 of the City Code of the City of Hugo, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Hugo Zoning Map to Agricultural (AG) with respect to the property legally described as follows: The West half of Northeast Quarter of Section Thirteen in Township Thirty-one North, of Range Twenty-one West, Washington County, Minnesota. Section 1. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon its passage. ADOPTED BY THE HUGO CITY COUNCIL ON JANUARY 6, 2019. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk My name is Ed Tschida and I am looking to take my land from the current program I am enrolled in and enroll it in the Minnesota Land Trust Metro Habitat Protection Program. I have owned this land for the last 36 years and have many great memories. When I purchased this land, it was a corn field with very little value to wildlife and water quality for most of the year. Being that this property includes many acres of wetland, my goal was to turn the property into a haven for wildlife and an area that improves water quality for miles around. Over the next 15 years I planted 4-5000 trees on the parts of the property that are not wetland. It is now mostly a forest of white pines, norways, white spruce, blue spruce oaks, birch and aspen. That coupled with numerous wetlands, makes this a desirable location for many species of wildlife. There are abundant numbers of deer, swans, geese, ducks, songbirds, pheasants, coyotes and other wildlife. I am now 77 years old and my time with this property is limited. I will have to sell this incredible piece soon. My goal is for this property to remain the pristine property that it is and for my efforts to reach far into the future. When the state and Washington county came to me with the Minnesota Land Trust Metro Habitat Protection Program, I thought this would be the perfect opportunity to do exactly what I have wanted to do with this property all along. I am "all in" on this request from the state and Washington county. I hope all parties involved are "all in" as well. In this process, I have taken 5 different groups or individuals from the state and/or Washington county through my property. They have all exclaimed that this property is exactly the type of property they want enrolled in the program. Sincerely, Ed Tschida Agenda Number: CITY OF HUGO PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director G.22 SUBJECT: OP5 Adelaide (Excelsior Group) — Adelaide Landing PUD Amendment DATE: December 31, 2019 for the City Council meeting of January 6, 2020 ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD) LAND USE: Low Density Residential (LD) DEADLINE DATE: 120-days — February 8, 2020 1. PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE: At its Thursday, December 19, 2019, meeting the Planning Commission considered and held a public hearing on the request. There was one resident that spoke during the public hearing that had concerns about additional traffic and the reduced setbacks proposed. She questioned why the developer did not anticipate the requested setbacks during the original approval of the PUD and preliminary plat. The applicants representative addressed the Planning Commission and stated that the home builder was not a partner with the applicant during the original approvals. The density and number of lots is not changing, but the reduced setbacks for the type of home product they would like to build are proposed to be changed. The Planning Commission discussed the request. They stated they liked products that are already built in the development by the proposed builder. They recommended approval of the PUD amendment OP5 Adelaide (Excelsior Group) for the development known as "Adelaide Landing", subject to the conditions listed in the resolutions. Page 2 2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a PUD Amendment to revise the building setbacks for the 50-foot wide single family lots on the northern portion of the development. There are 51 lots approved in the area with the preliminary plat, the total number of lots will not change. The approved and proposed setbacks are in the table below: 50 foot Wide 50 foot Wide Lots Lots Approved Proposed Front Setback (min) 25 Ft 25 Ft Front Setback (min) 25 Ft 20 Ft for side of the home on corner lots Side Setback min 7.5 Ft 5 Ft Rear Setback min 30 Ft 25 Ft 3. BACKGROUND: The applicant has approval of a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a residential development. The property totals 216.6 acres. The property includes wetlands and floodplain for a total buildable acreage of 146.2 acres. The development was approved to include 324 single family residential lots. The applicant received PUD flexibility on the following during the PUD General Plan approval in 2017: • Flexibility to allow various lot sized with a minimum lot size of 5,850 square feet, where 10,400 square feet is required. • Flexibility to allow various lot width with a minimum lot width of 45 feet, were 80 feet is required by ordinance. • Flexibility to allow a minimum front setback of 20 feet (for side loaded garages), where 30 feet is required. • Flexibility to allow a minimum rear setback of 25 feet, where 30 feet is required. • Flexibility to allow a minimum side yard setback of 7.5 feet, where 10 feet is required. • Flexibility to allow a maximum impervious coverage of a lot to be 55% , where 50% is required. • Flexibility to allow a minimum right-of-way width of 50 feet, where 60 feet is required. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer has: • Designed a more sensitive proposal, with less density, than would have been the case with the use of the standard R-3 zoning district. Page 3 • Provided a public park within the development, with improvements that exceed City standards. • Provided a public trail to connect to existing trails in the adjacent developments. Preserving and enhancing natural features with the trail system that meanders through the development. • Provided a landscaping plan that exceeds City standards. • Preserved existing significant trees on the property. • Created a stormwater reuse irrigation project within the development. • Incorporated architectural design guidelines for the homes in the development 4. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding land Use and Zoning The property to the north is zoned Low Density Multiple Family Residential (R-4) and occupied by the Pineview Meadows townhome development. The properties to the east, south, and west are zoned Single Family Detached Residential (R-3) and occupied by the Country Ponds, Beaver Ponds, and Birch Tree Ponds residential developments. The properties to the west, across Highway 61, are zoning General Industrial (1-3) and are occupied by industrial uses. There are also a few vacant parcels to the east that are also zoned Single Family Detached Residential (R- 3). B. Natural Characteristics of Site The properties are currently vacant and do contain some challenges regarding an existing drainage ditch, floodplain, and high ground water. The properties are relatively flat with approximately 57 acres of wetlands. 5. ANALYSIS: A. Level of Discretion in Decision Making The City has relatively high level of discretion in approving a PUD. A PUD must be consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Planned Unit Development The 2030 Comprehensive Plan shows the land use being Low Density Residential (LD). The PUD is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in terms of land use and density. The Adelaide Landing PUD general plan has offered a creative and efficient method to planning the site, all which meets the intent of the PUD ordinance. It is in staff s opinion that the PUD amendment meets the intent of the PUD ordinance, and is consistent with the PUD general plan. Page 4 Lot Sizes and Setbacks The applicant is requesting a change in the setbacks for the 50-foot wide lots. 50 foot Wide 50 foot Wide Lots Lots Approved Proposed Front Setback (min) 25 Ft 25 Ft Front Setback (min) 25 Ft 20 Ft for side of the home on corner lots Side Setback min 7.5 Ft 5 Ft Rear Setback min 30 Ft 25 Ft Although the applicant is requesting the minimum side yard setback to be 5 feet (10 feet between homes), the majority of the buildings will have a 6 foot side yard setback (12 feet between homes). There are 3 instances where there are 10 feet between buildings, Lot 8, Block 2; Lot 5, Block 3, and Lot 7 Block 5. The 10 feet between buildings will only occur at the closet points at the corners of the building not necessarily the entire length of the home. Staff recommends the following setbacks: 50 foot Wide Lots Front Setback (min) 25 Ft Front Setback (min) for side of the 20 Ft home on corner lots Side Setback min 6 Ft Side Setback (min) Lot 8, Block 4, 5 Ft Lot 5, Block 3, and Lot 7 Block 5 Rear Setback min 25 Ft The City of Hugo has approved a 5 foot side yard setback for certain homes in the Victor Gardens and Fable Hill developments. Villa Product Home Style The Villa product that the applicant is proposed to be built in this area is the same M/I Home Villa product that is currently being built in Adelaide Landing at the northeast corner of Highway 61 and 130th Street (55 foot wide lots). The applicant would like to build the same product on the 50 foot wide lots. There are examples in the packet of the elevations of the Villa product. The design has the garage flush with the front of the homes, so it is not a garage forward/dominate design. Page 5 This product is maintenance provided (mowing, landscaping, and snow removal) by the home owners association. Density The maximum development density for a PUD in the R-3 zoning district is 4 units per 1 acre. The applicant is proposing a residential net density of 2.2 units per 1 acre, which fits the requirements of a PUD. Although the applicant has requested flexibility on lot sizes and setbacks, the density meets the ordinance standards. Landscaping In exchange for additional flexibility the applicant has provided a revised landscape plan that includes additional landscaping along the north and west sides, than what was previously approved with the development. Staff recommends additional landscaping for a buffer with a combination of deciduous and coniferous trees. The final landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff. The rear yard setbacks of the homes along the existing neighborhoods will be more than the proposed 25 foot rear yard setback. The rear yard setback for those lots will be between 35 feet and 70 feet. The PUD amended is also related to the plans that are received by the City and will need to meet the proposed plans. 6. CONCLUSION: Staff is recommending the following setbacks for the PUD Amendment: 50 foot Wide Lots Front Setback (min) 25 Ft Front Setback (min) for side of the 20 Ft home on corner lots Side Setback (min) 6 Ft Side Setback (min) Lot 8, Block 4; 5 Ft Lot 5, Block 3, and Lot 7 Block 5 Rear Setback (min) 25 Ft Staff believes that the layout of the proposed Adelaide Landing PUD general plan exceeds the City's standards for residential developments. The developer has offered a more creative and efficient approach to the existing constraints of the property through the site design layout. The PUD amendment is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and the approved Adelaide Landing PUD. It is in staff's opinion that the applicant meets all the requirements necessary to approve the PUD amendment. Page 6 7. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the PUD amendment OP5 Adelaide (Excelsior Group) for the development to be known as "Adelaide Landing", subject to the conditions listed in the resolutions. 8. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommended approval of the PUD amendment OP5 Adelaide (Excelsior Group) for the development known as "Adelaide Landing", subject to the conditions listed in the resolutions. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location map 2. Resolution 3. Applicants Narrative Dated December 13, 2019 4. Approved PUD General Plan March 3, 2017 5. Proposed PUD General Plan October 8, 2019 6. Proposed Grading Plan dated October 2, 2018, revised, November 4, 2019 7. Revised Landscape Plan dated December 12, 2019 8. Building Elevations from M/I Homes 9. Examples of Buildings/Developments using a 4 Ft Side Yard Setbacks in other Communities yi y t s - - 1 - �• i:: .cra ,,�CITTY OF^ iiV� EST. 1908 i r�M u h- +TM,f. riR • iSMZ Adelaide Landing PUD Amendment Location Map Hugo, MN Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary N 0 700 Feet 1 in = 700 feet RESOLUTION 2020- APPROVING PUD AMENDMENT FOR OP5 ADELAIDE (EXCELSIOR GROUP) FOR "ADELAIDE LANDING" ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF HIGHWAY 61 AND NORTH OF 130TH STREET WHEREAS, OP5 Adelaide, has requested approval of a PUD amendment to allow a revision to the general plan to reduce the side yard and rear yard setbacks for the 50 foot wide lots on the property legally described as follows: Outlot B, Adelaide Landing WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the PUD amendment at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by OP5 Adelaide, subject to the following conditions: 1. A PUD Amendment is approved to revise the setbacks to the following: 50 foot Wide Lots Front Setback (min) 25 Ft Front Setback (min) for side of the 20 Ft home on corner lots Side Setback (min) 6 Ft Side Setback (min) Lot 8, Block 4; 5 Ft Lot 5, Block 3, and Lot 7 Block 5 Rear Setback (min) 25 Ft , in accordance with the plans received on October 11, 2019, November 21, 2019, and December 13, 2019, except as amended by this resolution. 2. PUD flexibility is granted allow the changes shown on the November 21, 2019 and December 13, 2019, plans, except as amended by this resolution. 3. The development shall be subject to the conditions of the May 1, 2017 PUD and preliminary plat approvals (Resolution 2017-10 and 2017-11) except as amended by this resolution. 4. The PUD general plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and Adelaide Landing PUD. Resolution 2020- Page 2 5. The developer must comply with the following, prior to Final Plat and Final PUD Plan application: 6. The plans shall be revised to include items that are amended with this resolution. Landscaping and Sidewalks a. The landscape plan shall be revised to include additional tree for buffer to existing neighborhoods. The final landscape plans must be submitted for review and approval by staff. b. The plans shall be revised to add a sidewalk connecting to 137th Street. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6th of January, 2020 Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk ADELAIDE LANDING Hugo, Minnesota PUD AMENDMENT NARRATIVE October 11, 2019 The City of Hugo City Council approved the preliminary plat and PUD for Adelaide Landing on May 1, 2017. The PUD general plan was approved to allow the creation of 319 single family residential lots and 10 outlots. In May 2019, a PUD Amendment was approved to 5 lots, and change the approved 75' wide lots to 65' wide lots. A total of 324 lots are approved for Adelaide Landing. OP5 Adelaide, LLC has been developing Adelaide Landing per the approved Preliminary Plat and PUD since 2017. Currently, 1", 2nd, Yd, and 4' Additions are substantially completed with 192 finished lots in the process of being purchased for home construction by our builder partners, MI Homes, Creative Homes and Derrick Custom Homes. There are two future planned additions to be completed over the next few years. OP5 Adelaide anticipates bringing a 5`h Addition Final Plat forward for construction to begin Spring 2020. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST OP5 Adelaide is requesting a PUD Amendment to address changes to the future development of the 50' wide villa lots on the Northwest corner of the site. In order to meet market demands, OP5 Adelaide is requesting a PUD Amendment to include the following: • Minimum Side Setback of 5 feet on the future villa product in the Northwest corner of the project. Currently, 7.5 feet is the approved minimum side setback under the approved PUD. • Minimum Rear Setback of 25', which matches the approved rear setback for the completed villas on the south side of Adelaide Landing. Currently, 30' is the approved rear setback. • Side Setback at Corners of 20', which matches the approved corner side setback for the completed villas on the south side of Adelaide Landing. Currently, 25' is approved. All other PUD requirements as originally approved will remain in place, including lot count of 324. Below is a comparison of the current approved PUD requirements vs. proposed PUD Amendment: Approved Villa Lots (South) Approved Villa Lots (North) Proposed 50' Villa Lots (North) Min Lot Area 5,850 SF 6,513 SF 6,344 SF Avg Lot Area 7,601 SF 8,138 SF 8,246 SF Lot Width (min) 45 Ft 50 Ft 50 Ft Lot Depth (min) 130 Ft 130 Ft 130 Ft Front Setback (min) 20 Ft — Side Load Garage 25 Ft — Front Load Garage 25 Ft 25 Ft Side Setback (min) 7.5 Ft 7.5 Ft 5 Ft Rear Setback (min) 25 Ft 30 Ft 30 Ft Lot Impervious (max) 55% 50% 50% Adelaide Landing PUD Amendment - Narrative FUTURE VILLA PRODUCT MI Homes will be the builder of this north villa neighborhood within Adelaide Landing. As previously planned, this villa product will become part of the existing Adelaide Landing Villa HOA consisting of the villa product within 1" and 2nd Addition. MI Homes is the builder on all the current villa product within Adelaide Landing and expects to construct a similar product on the future villa product. Currently, MI is building a 40' wide home on a 55' wide lot with 7.5' side setbacks in the south villa area (I't and 2nd Additions). This PUD Amendment will allow MI to construct the same 40' wide home as they are currently building. This PUD Amendment is requesting a minimum lot width of 50' with a minimum side setback of 5'. The majority of the 51 lots in this north villa area will be 52' wide lots with a side setback of 6'. The exception to the 52' width and 6' side setbacks are the 3 lots shown highlighted on the attached color rendering (Lot 8 Block 2, Lot 5 Block 4, and Lot 7 Block 5). These will meet the minimum 50' width and 5' side setbacks. The reason for this proposed PUD Amendment is to allow MI to continue with this current product, as it has been proven with the south villas to be a high demand product in this market. Furthermore, it has been a positive addition to the Adelaide Landing community and the City of Hugo. This product fits in with the attached product to the north of Adelaide Landing. We plan to provide a landscaped entrance feature at both the 137' St. N. and Flay Ave. N. entrances. Elevations from MI Homes will be provided as part of this application. PROJECT CONTACTS Developer/Owner: Engineer/Wetlands/EAW: The Excelsior Group Steph Griffin, Development Manager steph.griffinoexcelsiorllc.com 952.525.3239 1660 Highway 100 South, Suite 400 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Westwood Professional Services John Bender, Project Manager John. Benderowestwoodps.com 952.697-5727 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite 300 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Adelaide Landing PUD Amendment - Narrative Adelaide Landing Yfugo, _14A, ,11/I Ames Villa Homes M/I Homes will be the exclusive builder of the Villa Neighborhood. Villa Homes are single family homes with association maintenance of yards and snow removal. These homes meet the increasing demand for empty nesters households seeking single -level living with association maintenance. Villa Homes provide the benefits of a single family home, with all the conveniences of a townhome. The association maintenance of lawns and snow removal provides the homeowner with the freedom to travel, own a winter or summer home, or more time for recreation. M/I Homes assists each customer in selecting and designing a home that fits their particular needs. Individual homeowners have the ability to choose from a wide variety of plans, exterior materials, including extensive use of brick and stone, architectural features, and landscape designs. This process creates variety and interest in the architecture of the neighborhood. Required Setbacks The Villa Homes feature private outdoor patio spaces, a private yard, plentiful landscaping, and a homeowners association to take care of the exterior spaces. While the yard areas are maintained by the association, these homes sit on individual lots. This type of home with association maintenance requires flexibility from standard single family zoning requirements. The setbacks for these homes are: 1) 25- foot front yard, 2) 5-foot side yard, and 3) 25-foot rear yard. The association is responsible to maintain the yards, and has easements over the lots for access and maintenance. Each homeowner also has access easements over adjacent lots for the purpose of maintenance and upkeep of their home. This gives every homeowner 10 feet of usable space on each side of their home. Under standard zoning, a homeowner would only have 7.5 feet. While this PUD Amendment is requesting changing the side setbacks from 7.5' to 5', 48 of the 51 villa lots will have side setbacks of 6'. In order to fit this product on 3 of the 51 lots, 5' side setbacks are required. These lots, highlighted on the color rendering, are Lot 7 Block 5, Lot 5 Block 3, and Lot 8 Block 4. It is important to note that the minimum side setback requested of 5' is only the closest point between homes and is not necessarily the entire length of each home. This application is also seeking an amendment from 30' rear yard setbacks to 25' rear yard setbacks and side setbacks at corners from 25' to 20'. Currently, in the existing south villas, we have 25' rear yard setbacks and 20' side setbacks at corners. This allows MI to provide the same product on the north villas as the south villas, which allows for an optional sunroom. Homeowner's Association Control The HOA for the Villa neighborhood not only maintains the exterior yards, but also controls and regulates individual lots within the neighborhood association. The HOA does not allow perimeter fences, sheds, or similar structures. Changes in landscaping are reviewed by the HOA to make sure changes protect and add privacy while taking into account future maintenance. Restrictions on outdoor storage, parking (no boats, campers, or trailers) keeps the neighborhood looking orderly and well maintained. The Association also controls exterior modifications and drainage. With smaller lots, it's more critical for homeowners and the Association to maintain pre -established drainage patterns, including drainage swales between homes. Homeowner Preference M/I Homes has constructed thousands of Villa Homes throughout the Twin Cities metro area. What we have learned in the process is that Villa buyers prefer a well -designed home with higher end finishes, variety in exterior architecture, and private outdoor spaces. Villa buyers are downsizing from a larger homes and want smaller spaces without the hassle of exterior maintenance. These buyers prefer to spend their money on the look of the home and the quality of the finishes, as opposed to buying a larger lot. Further, a larger lot drives up the cost of exterior maintenance and makes the association maintenance less affordable. Landscaping & Entrance This villa neighborhood will be the northerly entrance to Adelaide Landing. Therefore, we plan to install an enhanced buffer of a variety of trees along the project boundary to the north and west. This buffer will be similar to the buffer that includes a variety of coniferous and deciduous trees installed along the project boundary and 130th St. At the 137th St. entrance, a monument will be installed like the current monument at the main entrance to Adelaide Landing, but on a smaller scale. Furthermore, we anticipate working with the neighbors at the 137th St. entrance to remove the temporary cul de sac, restore yards, and install the entrance monument and landscaping. NM Homes Villa Neighborhoods M/I Homes is the largest builder of villa communities in the Twin Cities, we have developed villa neighborhoods in the following communities: city Lot Width Side Yard Setback Blaine 48 feet 4 feet Dayton 50 feet 5 feet Corcoran 50 feet 5 feet Minnetrista 50 feet 5 feet Carver 50 feet 5 feet Victoria 50 feet 5 feet Waconia 50 feet 5 feet Prior Lake 50 feet 4 feet Newport 50 feet 5 feet Lake Elmo 50 feet 4 feet Hudson 50 feet 4 feet Farmington 50 feet 4 feet Lakeville 50 feet 5 feet Hugo 55 feet 7.5 feet Villa communities are growing in popularity throughout the country given the aging population and the demand for single level living. Historically, the only option for single level living were attached townhomes and apartments. Many people want the conveniences of attached housing, but still desire a single family home. Villa homes are the perfect option for many looking for this type of lifestyle. However, price is a big factor as most want to downsize without taking on additional mortgage debt. Making sure that villa homes are "right sized" in terms of square footage and lot size are critical to a successful community. mat II 1 ustrative PUD Amendment 'APPROVED APRIL 25, 2019 .1 " -j- V_L�__i!L i r, Ti L ll L — 4 ;` J1 ] ; APPROVED PROJECT DATA PROPOSED PROJECT DATA ii r r'/ ,', i T T ii ii Gross Site Area: 216.6 ac Gross Site Area: 216.6 ac 3 h,� , Iooaa o I \ Collector Road ROW: 8.1 ac Collector Road ROW: 8.1 ac - ------------ CSI 61 3.4 ac. CSAH 61: 3.4 ac. Z j L. `I itItA. F. 130th Street 4.7 ac. L. 130th Street: 4.7 ac. F" AL Existing Wetlands: 57.7 ac Existing Wetlands: 57.7 ac Floodzone(100 yr): 4.6 ac Floodzone(100 yr): 4.6 ac -------------- 1 / \.�� l I f (beyond wetland limits) (beyond wetland limits) L_j -------------• Net Developable Area: 146.2 ac Net Developable Area: 146.2 ac 1�91 Park/Open ace: 111.0 ac Park/Open $pace: 111.0 ac (in (includesponds, parks, wetlands, wet buffers, road buffers, woods, etc.) includes ponds, parks, wetlands, wet buffers, road buffers, woods, etc.) J, P osed Residential Homes 319 lots Proposed Residential Homes 324 lots rop Pro p Det ace d Vi I I as Lot s: 83 lots Det ace d Vi I I as Lot s: 0 lots 50'Sngle Family Lots: 51 lots 50'Sngle Family Lots: 51 lots 55Sngle Family Lots: 0 lots 55'Sngle Family Lots: 81 lots 4W 65'Sngle Family Lots: 34 lots 65',9ngle Family Lots: 108 lots �Y 4 7n,.qnn1P Fqmil\/ I nt-q• R1 Infiq 7n, qnnhn P-qmil\/ I ntcz• In intQ Fbnding/ -reserved 85' ,,/ l,._ a Eingle Family Lots: 90 Lots 85'Sngle Family Lots: 84 Lots (Incl udes 7 f uture lots by ot hers) lu"Ild SDi I Borrow/�. / *(Includes7fut ire lots by others) Aspen Grove G A Rood Storage 49 Overall . Gross Density: 1.6 un/ac Overall Gross Density: 1.6 un/ac JL I I 0� r— - - - 319 units/ 197 5 ac 394 units/ 197 C; nr I F71 j .Overall Net Density: 2.2 un/ac Overall Net Density: 2.2 un/ac 319units/ 146.2 ac 324 units/ 146.2 ac I I I UK' - - - - - - - - - - F *. _ -_ - /-f Set b acks: Set b acks: 4 _, \ ` \ :,:' 50'Sngle Family Lots: 50'Sngle Family Lots: SdeSetbacks: 7.577.5'(15'Total) 9de Setbacks: 575'(10'Total Aerial photography from State of Minnesota; j Aerial photography from State of Minnesota; 114, ! �� / _ _ _ ;', Topography from State LIDAR Topography from State LIDAR Lj Existing 47;2 Wetland A& i . �V OUTLOTJ�7- J ICA, W4 V ------------------- ----------- --------------- ------- ---------------------------- 7 \ •- I I _ `\ I f 1� I I I I I I '�` � �{ ' L r� N ' 7rr rc lF � I r \\ \ \\ / r r/ � r \ ti.. �\�\ \ \ II r ii\ \ � < ,' � I>^ � , — , � / _--11�— 1 f l f � r r� I I I � �� � ' � ---------- ?�Jj/ I Jof a Westwood EXCELSIOR Phone (952) 937-5150 7699 Anagram Drive -.0- The Excelsior Group Fax (952) 937-5822 Eden Prairie, MIN 55344 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com 02-21-2019 0008463 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Sling ■1 :Family, �� '�� ��;,�` �l� �■ ■ -------------- ���/ 1 r M 1 , '.vni . I� II 1, � �. 1■y 1 i� _ _ _ __ I11 ,I � ( � �' � i� �,''�� // d, l( 'Oy g1 ,. I '.",». ■ . \!I•Si, � +4''-,�9a,9 �,_aCa.aY-------- --- �� 1 ■ ,: I� �� ( �� ` // ., ��' III � �� ■ �+_ Q� � ��• - ,, �or3u��.;�— ...�_------- ___= II e•a � '' : =7 WMIN a Fonlaw MGM= VAI Wal =1 lip FEW W-1 rm-11=1 MOM] IM IM EMI EMI JUA Ir. Nm Mr. Im I'm QUA, UILUI t �! ■ pk � �� ���... , UU I LU 11�.■■■:.:►,,s2! Fbnd sting nd 7i* W, K-Landscap e Bu ffe r Wetland 4 - ------------------ _(g Fir Preserved R n e G a Entry Monument 4 k 111W Ad e aid a an d 'in1 01 200' 400' 600' -<IN Hugo, MN V am raw. =�kr, , r.F,., r. % A t 'Arm �# f J � • - --46,�L y F �a ;����_� F �"+L qpw ;IF T_ _ =x _ _ R jF _ - Fond +; i r 6 MW z T � 4. • =� ,f} jr IF It irdr Or dp Po n •� - # f� , �l # �.o '. Af OF . •31 'fir t + r�ti� '�•�r..,,, '7�_ t �Y_ _ "OpOr 00°' � r r F y / /jj Or IMF - INK -b . . 3 ff . . g :_./oi _ I ti ,: _ miolp--7 �4• R. a �*fiou,Ae . ' L i,_ ■ i I 4r J-p if kpir r■ 5, 7 #�40OF Ooor i ' + - A IF - Q s &isting r• + Wetland :- a r Tra i kvN 1� ! i OL •{ 04. PA 51 Lots F i A, N L � �j 1 timILTITL•I0I• i�r d I u u H u g c 171 • © 2019 Westwood Profes � I I I II I i I I � a°�a���0�� c'` � ill ' • •s�,4♦aoo 'I N.V-1 ♦♦1.��♦♦�♦♦ ♦.� � �♦����♦jam. • � `°�♦♦e �e , ,` � �Od wo 941.5 .b t Ln �I o J rn 4.� C� - ----------- A:: 04 I I A. - CD ]?NLJ I I I i 4.. ul CD � _'2 36.81.4378 '• '• 3 w ++ Ond „8 NVS - - �1 VM FLAY A VE)VUE N. 9 lid • --tnr.L 0 r % I � co I r� h Lq rn c� 1 39 CD Lq rn 00 li m m = 1 rn 3I8. ° o I I m 00 o /rn C p\� � � � I 'TEMPORARY DEWATERING CHANNEL PRIOR TO STORM SEWER AS NECESSARY Cd n rn o � co 01 no ME 0 0 0 N dQ " II i ,6 ~ I-IC IICX Wa w0 WETLAND KES 2 I `92\ FILL=0.07 AC. 92 POND ja a►��ii9s �1�- '•D :• i - NMI as M- TWO ROWS OF BMP'S - J NEEDS TO BE IMPACTED. PROTECT WETLAND IN THE / - = �- INTERIM PERIOD M WETLAN KE TEMPORARY DEWA,.:ERING\ _ CHANNEL PRIOR TO STORM SEWER .A NECESS RY \ 933'S �►/ � \� Wp TWO ROWS OF BMP'S i G 0 o `o NEEDED WHERE DISTURBED 94�•5 G // I ry SOILS ARE WITHIN 50FT OF ►,. �� �\ / % s 3 / M I NWL OF r LAND MA= ONE rn 70q 9 ' - - •- M \ / 0)goo I m= C ' II 941.7 G G 941.7 G 941.6 G 941.5 G 941.5 I R R R R R TEMPOR DEWATE ICHANNERIOR TO Mo �k ad \ \ I \ li CO �i 0') n rn \ O O 940- -� N 0o c� JI �� 5 1 \ 'J R R R R G 9�k15 / ::::.:•: sg \ J o 3 �l 0) \ \ \ n 941.5 G 941.5 G 941.5 G 941.5 G j / 89 I L sCD 0) \ \ - / �::..: DND \ \ v 15 - ) ^ g ai �� 933.5 - 933.5 9 if 936.E 933.5 I II 93 �7 933.6 933.5 - �g33. R II LO WO WO WO ' WO G 941.7 G 941.6 G 941.5 G 941.5 G 941.5: : 9415 I I I I I I I .. �FLETCH�E LANE I 0.62% 4 0.60% 17 0.60% 16 6 ix / W 941.5 G 941.5 G 941.5 G 941.5 G G 941.5 G 941 R R R R LO 941.5 02)�2'p \ \- �.. LO 942.1 G � 933.5 933.5 933.5 933.5 I I 933.5 933.5 WO(1) 934.1 \ WETLAND KES - 2:.- M M ` D� 1 1.: .. VV M936.5 9� :I- ...� � w ( 934.8 �... O X M LL: L.L. X ^ \ l J 1 I � DND o� Liam)Iii rn SILT FENCE TYP Westwood I hereby certify that this plan was prepared me or under AL Revisions direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL mod; Jgg ENGINEER under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 11/07/18 Revised Pond 12 04/22/19 Revised per Plat Checked: J1HB Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 09/09/19 Revised Rear Swales Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 11/04/19 Revised NW Villas Grading Drawn: DJW Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com John Bender Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 11/04/19 License Na 43358� Drawing/� Prepared for: 0F5 Adelaide LLC 1660 Highway 100 South, Suite 400 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance LEGEND: DENOTES SOIL BORING �SF� DENOTES SILT FENCE PW SF DENOTES POST GRADING SILT FENCE �HDSF� DENOTES HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE -980 DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS ..-980- - DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER �►►� DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING TREE LINE DENOTES APPROXIMATE TREE REMOVAL LIMITS x 856.3 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION �66.30 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION 66.30 DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION /TEMP X0001:10b FOR TEMPORARY DITCH DENOTES EROSION CONTROL ROCK CHECKS E.O.F. DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW TW=1020 DENOTES TOP WALL ELEVATION BW=1000 DENOTES BOTTOM WALL ELEVATION DENOTES RETAINING WALL DENOTES INLET PROTECTION AT CATCH BASINS .'.'.'.'.'...'.'.'.'.'.'.'.'.' DENOTES WOOD FIBER EROSION :•:•:•:•:•:•:.:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•:•: CONTROL BLANKET ............... (3:1 AND STEEPER SLOPES) DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER MONUMENT DENOTES EXISTING TREE TO BE REMOVED DENOTES EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN DENOTES WETLAND FILL - - DENOTES WETLAND - - DENOTES WETLAND BUFFER DND DENOTES DO NOT DISTURB POND ACCESS ROUTE EROSION CONTROL NOTES: • ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN -PLACE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE ON -SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL. TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAY BALES, ETC., REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. • ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO THE DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS. • SEED & MULCH ALL DISTURBED AREAS, EXCLUDING ROAD BEDS & PONDS BELOW OUTLET ELEV. GENERAL GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES: • ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTER GRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. • REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD-VERFIY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLAN. • ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES. • POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES. Adelaide Landing 4th Add. Phase 2 grading ADELAIDE - L A N D I N G- Hugo, MN 0 I MM[___ !I 0' 50' 100' 150' Latest Revision Date: 11/04/19 0008463GDF02.dwg Date: 10/02/18 sheet: 6 of 9 Grading Drainage and Erosion Control Plan ©2019 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. g36 936 I 936T7 ------ I --Ti 0 � � 94 1 NPO '3 - ---- i — HH� -----J 777 0 9 ► ►► /ITI _36 936 PNOP 4 CCF VB 2 926 924 1 1 REL 1 940 1 SGM 3 NOS 1 NPO 936 1 4 NOS 1 AGG 1 ABM 4 CCF 2 WH 1 922 920 1 1 918 �C / \ - 1 4REL °' 1 I I I I 4 I I 5 6 1 2 3 6 BHS 6 swo 0 1 I I/ \ / / I \ I I I I I I I i �� / � �-�-, � L 8 SKH I \ 1 I— / O OT A L / Ly�-j 10, CO / �� MON�ME3D�ETA 10.1 S►►► ., i , 7 9�IF 1 1 3 QUA -- - _-_ -1 F- — — - - _ ►►► \ ``` / / // I �,� 3 NOS 1 1 IF 13 2 SWO �, 1 19 ABM I 4 I `� �^, ` 2 c I I ol 936 — — F — — pi 934 —1 7 A 4 BHS 1 2 1 2 I I 't 12 I \ 1 I I 9 L — — _ L 5 WHP A —No1 -1 7 - r - - u 3 3 - g I / tK F, I I I 11 I 10 �� L- L - - -J �-I�0 -� 938 _ - - - J / 940 _ 1 4 4 I I m I °'`L�� ' 942 944 \ 1 I I 10 I 11 I 0) e J— L- - � - J .NATIVE 6 4 BHS - - / SEED�MIX 8 / F- -F 33 261 T 5 �\ / I 4 5 NOS 2 1 1 9 1 I 112 - 5 SKH � J d- 9 - - \AIX_ ►o 0 5 -7 I 13 41 6 - I 7 N / ' I � � — 4WHP 14 4 i I � � / I I � . ► � / 10 932 \ 8 / / ^ 14 AGG 1 / MlT �`nIQ \ FUTURE 12 940 12 / l L.NDS APl Jl / 938 / / 13-930(P) 14 8 \ � IJ 4L , , J / 3g / / I / 1 / � 12 REO ��`y \ \ o 13 v/ J 934 16 / _�, � / l / \ / 32 r NATIVE WET 30 � � / /WHP SEED MIX � � J \ V- \ � (33-261) L � , i J L 40 / o 0' 50' 100' 150' / U Call 48 Hours before digging: 5TH / 1 / OW INTENANCE / \ t I 811 or cal1811.com 1I ti ADDITION - 14 % ^ - ' � 1 1 � RF OFF TRAIL Common Ground Alliance LIMIT , 1 8' BITUMINOUS \ \ _ Date: 12/12/19 Sheet: 2 of 5 0008463.05PLF01.d, Westwood I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under AL Revisions- � Prepared for: Final Landscape direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL rj'1'M • LANDSCAPE AR under the laws of the State of Minnesota.0F5 Adelaide LLC ADELAIDE Plan - 5th Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Drawn: SAR Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Cory Meyer 1660 Highway 100 South, Addition Remora �� ��� Suite 400 LANDING Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 12/12/ �cenee Na 26971 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 Hugo, MN ©2019 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Planting Notes Planting Details Secondary Entry Monument Planting Plan SCALE 1" = 10'-0" Stormwater Native Seed Mix 33-261 33-261 Stormwater South & West 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT COMMON GROUND ALLIANCE AT 811 OR CALL811.COM TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL. 2. ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS. 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. 4. ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTE BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. FIELD SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AND/OR CITY PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ONE YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANT MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING. 6. AT TIME OF PLANTING ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO, BUT IS NOT LIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS: ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, OPEN WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHY BRANCHING AND LEAFING. CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN 5: 3. 7. PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK (ANSI Z60.1-2014 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED. 8. PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. 9. PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL -IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARY ONLY. 10. AT CONTRACTOR DISCRETION, TWINE AND TOP OF BURLAP MAY BE LEFT ON FOR INITIAL YEAR AFTER INSTALLATION ONLY IF BIODEGRADABLE TWINE AND BURLAP ARE USED. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY TWINE AND BURLAP DEGRADATION AFTER ONE YEAR PERIOD AND REMOVE ANY REMNANT MATERIAL AS NECESSARY. 11. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. 12. REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS. 13. PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING AND PROPOSED TREES. 14. STAKING OF TREES IS OPTIONAL AT CONTRACTOR DISCRETION; REPOSITION AND PLUMB IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR. NON -PLUMB TREES TO BE SUBJECT TO WARRANTY REPLACEMENT OR REPAIR. 15. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS. 16. BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (COMMON TOPSOIL BORROW) AND TO BE NATIVE TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH, SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS. 17. MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS. TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS WITHIN TURF AREAS. PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2" DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 18. EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE VALLEY -VIEW BLACK DIAMOND (OR EQUAL) POLY EDGING OR SPADED EDGE, AS INDICATED. POLY EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH SMOOTH CURVES AND STAKED WITH METAL SPIKES NO GREATER THAN 4 FOOT ON CENTER WITH BASE OF TOP BEAD AT GRADE, FOR MOWERS TO CUT ABOVE WITHOUT DAMAGE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB, OR RAIN -GARDEN BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. EDGING TO MATCH EXISTING CONDITIONS (WHERE APPLICABLE). 19. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED EXCEPT POND AREAS AND WETLAND BUFFERS (SEE GRADING PLAN / EROSION CONTROL). SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWN AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 20. PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL PLANTED AREAS ON SITE. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BY LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS, AS -BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. LAWN SPRINKLERS/IRRIGATION SYSTEMS SHALL ALL HAVE RAIN SENSORS TO LIMIT UNNECESSARY WATERING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. 21. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL. OWNER WILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR. 22. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION. 23. REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER. Westwood I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed PROFESSIONAL LANDSCAPE ARCFU= under the laws of the State of Minnesota DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING SHRUB PLANTING PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED, FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. TREE WRAP MATERIAL FROM GROUNDLINE UPWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES, AS REQUIRED. PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER PLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. N.T.S. LAST REVISED: LA28 PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES. PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER. GUYING AND STAKING AS REQUIRED, FOR ONE (1) YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: TOP STAKES 5' ABOVE GROUND (MAX.) OR TO FIRST BRANCH. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3' (MIN.) BELOW GROUND. STAKING POSTS TO BE 2"X2" STAINED WOOD OR PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL. SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH 16" LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL., 1.5" WIDE STRAP. PLACE MULCH, DEPTH AS SPECIFIED, OVER PLANT PITS - DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK. FORM 3" DEEP WATERING BASIN. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL SIZE. ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE. SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. N.T.S. LAST REVISED: LA29 REMOVE CONTAINER, SET SOIL MASS ON COMPACTED SOIL MOUND MATCHING SHRUBS NATURAL GROUNDLINE WITH FINISHED GRADE. ALL PLANTING BEDS SHALL RECEIVE 4" OF SPECIFIED MULCH AND WEED BARRIER FABRIC. EDGE ALL PLANTING BEDS WITH SPECIFIED EDGER WHERE ADJACENT TO LAWN AREAS. SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE. BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL. N.T.S. LAST REVISED: LA27 Final Plant Schedule - Entry Monument QTY. CODE COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME SIZE SPACING O.C. 10 ABH Incrediball Hydrangea / Hydrangea aborescens 'Abetwo' #5 CONT. 4'-0" O.C. 5 LDN Little Devil Ninebark / Physocarpus opulifolius 'Donna May' #5 CONT. 3'-0" O.C. 11 MIS Miscanthus Flame Grass / Miscanthus sinensis 'Purpurascens' #3 CONT. 36" O.C. 22 LRS Little Spire Russian Sage / Perovskia 'Little Spire' #1 CONT. 18" O.C. 19 BES Black -Eyed Susans / Rudbeckia fulgida var. sullivantii 'Goldstrum' #1 CONT. 18" O.C. 19 PDS Prairie Dropseed / Sporobolus heterolepis #1 CONT. 24" O.C. 26 RSD Ruby Stella Daylily / Hemerocallis 'Ruby Stella' #1 CONT. 18" O.C. Entry Monument Concept Elevation NOTE: ARTIST CONCEPT; SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITH SIGNAGE PERMIT APPLICATION. Prepared for: Common Name Scientific Name Rate (kg/ha) Rate (lb/ac) % of Mix (% by wt) Seeds/ sq ft big bluestem Andro 0 on gerardii 2.24 2.00 5.72% 7.35 fringed brome Bromus ciliatus 2.24 2.00 5.73% 8.10 bluejoint Calama rostis canadensis 0.07 0.06 0.18% 6.40 slender wheatgrass El mus trach caulus 1.12 1.00 2.85% 2.53 Virginia wild rye El mus vir inicus 1.68 1.50 4.28% 2.31 switchgrass Panicum vir atum 0.43 0.38 1.07% 1.93 fowl bluegrass Poa palustris 1.19 1.06 3.03% 50.70 Indian grass Sor hastrum nutans 0.13 0.12 0.36% 0.55 prairie cordgrass S artina pectinata 0.43 0.38 1.07% 0.91 Total Grasses 9.53 8.50 24.29% 80.78 awl -fruited sedge Carex sti ata 0.28 0.25 0.71 % 3.10 dark green bulrush Scir us atrovirens 0.21 0.19 0.54% 31.70 woolgrass Scir us cyperinus 0.07 0.06 0.18% 39.00 Total Sedges and Rushes 0.56 0.50 1.43% 73.80 Canada anemone Anemone canadensis 0.08 0.07 0.19% 0.20 marsh milkweed Ascle ias incarnata 0.12 0.11 0.32% 0.20 leafy beggarticks Bidens frondosa 0.12 0.11 0.31 % 0.20 flat-topped aster Doellin eria umbellate 0.07 0.06 0.17% 1.50 spotted Joe pye weed Eutrochium maculatum 0.07 0.06 0.18% 2.19 autumn sneezeweed Helenium autumnale 0.15 0.13 0.36% 5.97 obedient plant Ph soste is vir iniana 0.08 0.07 0.21 % 0.30 tall coneflower Rudbeckia laciniata 0.08 0.07 0.21 % 0.37 New England aster S m h otrichum novae -an liae 0.08 0.07 0.19% 1.56 blue vervain Verbena hastata 0.06 0.05 0.15% 1.85 olden alexanders Zizia aurea 0.22 0.20 0.56% 0.79 Total Forbs, 1.12 1.00 2.85% 15.13 Oats or winter wheat (see note at beginning of list for recommended dates) 28.02 25.00 71.43% 11.14 Total Cover Crop 28.02 25.00 71.43% 11.14 Totals: 39.23 35.00 100.00% 180.85 Purpose: Stormwater pond edges, temporarily flooded dry ponds, and temporarily flooded ditch bottoms. Planting Area: Tallgrass Aspen Parklands, Prairie Parkland, and Eastern Broadleaf Forest Provinces. Mn/DOT Districts 2(west), 313, 4, Metro, 6, 7 & 8. Low Maintenance Turf Seed Mix 25431 25-131 Low Maintenance Turf Common Name Scientific Name Rate (lb/ac) Rate (kg/ha) % of Mix (by weight) Seeds/ sq ft red fescue Festuca rubra 64.00 71.73 29.09% 667.00 Chewin 's Fescue Festuca rubra ssp. commutata 44.00 49.32 20.00% 458.60 Low Maintenance Kentucky bluegrass Poa pratensis Low Maintenance 36.00 40.35 16.361/6 1148.70 Hard fescue Festuca trachyphylla 30.00 33.63 13.640/6 389.10 Sheep Fescue Festuca ovina 25.00 28.02 11.37% 304.22 Perennial R e rass Lolium perenne 21.00 23.54 9.54% 104.60 Total 220.00 246.59 100.00% 3072.22 Purpose: Salt, shade and drought tolerant turfgrass. Requires less frequent mowing and less fertilization than conventional turfgrass. Planting Area: Statewide Combine all components when blending this mix. Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or call811.com Common Ground Alliance Date. 12/12/19 Sheet: 5 OF 5 0008463.05PLF01. dw Phone (952) 937-5150 12701 Whitewater Drive, Suite #300 Fax (952) 937-5822 Minnetonka, MN 55343 Toll Free (888) 937-5150 westwoodps.com Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Cory Meyer Date 12/12/Licenee No. 26971 Designed: NTM checkech CLM Drawn: SAR Record Drawing by/date 0R5 Adelaide LLC 1660 Highway 100 South, Suite 400 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 ADELAIDE LA N D I N G Hueo, MN Landscape Notes & Details /�\ i � �, �,�� , -•+� ..- _. t r. ��';� ,� �` �—: — :�. ���� - 'T 4 �_ m did a`dod d - .. Examples with a 4 foot side yard setback n w13 - \. EEL AL i S Agenda Number G.23 CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Wayne Scanlan. Variance and Conditional Use Permit (CUP) request for properties located south of 1771h Street and west of Henna Avenue North. Request to terminate the existing development agreement on the properties located at 7355 177th Street North and 17530 Henna Avenue North. DATE: December 31, 2019, 2019 for the City Council Meeting of January 6, 2020 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Agricultural (AG) ZONING: Future Urban Service (FUS) REVIEW DEADLINE: 120-days — March 5, 2020 1. PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE: At its Thursday, December 19, 2019, meeting the Planning Commission considered and held a public hearing on the request. Staff provided background on the request and recommended approval to the Commission. There was no one who spoke during the public hearing except the applicant's representative who thanked the Planning Commission for considering the request. The Planning Commission agreed that the applications met the criteria necessary to approve the variance and CUP requests and recommended approval of the applications to the City Council, subject to the conditions listed the resolutions. The Planning Commission also recommended approval of the release of the covenant against parcel 7355 1771h Street North and 17530 Henna Avenue North, if the variance and CUP are approved with the conditions listed in the resolutions. 2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval a variance for the property located at 17530 Henna Avenue North for the property to have 0 feet from street frontage, where 300 feet is required by ordinance. The property is an existing land locked parcel with an existing home. The applicant is also requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for shared driveway that provides access to 3 parcels, parcels A, B, and C (17530 Henna Avenue North, 17590 Henna Avenue North, and 7355 177th Street North,). Shared driveways require approval of a CUP. The Scanlan Variance and CUP shared driveway is already established and has been used to access the properties for several years. In addition, the applicant is requesting that an existing covenant be released that is against the properties at 7355 177th Street North and 17530 Henna Avenue North. The covenant states that the these properties shall be considered as one lot and cannot be sold separately. 3. BACKGROUND: In 1994, the applicant received approval for a minor subdivision of parcels A and B, which was one 20 acre lot at that time. The applicant also received approval to have a shared driveway over parcel B to access parcel A. The applicant owns parcel C and in an effort to not need a variance for the landlocked parcel A, the applicant agreed to combine parcel A and C. Washington County would not allow the lot combination because the parcels are in separate Sections. The City then required a covenant to be recorded against parcel A and C to be considered as one lot and that they cannot be sold separately. The applicant remains the owner of parcel A and C, parcel B is owned by separate owner. Parcel A and B both had homes on the properties. In 1999, the applicant built a house on parcel C. It was permitted by the City by the issuance of a building permit. From that time, Parcel A and C have been taxed and used as separate parcels. The applicant is now requesting approval of the variance and CUP and to have the covenants released so they can be sold separately. 4. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The properties and surrounding properties are zoned Future Urban Service (FUS) and are large lots with single family homes. The properties are guided Agricultural (AG) in the 2040 Land Use Plan. 5. LEVEL OF DISCRETION IN DECISION -MAKING: The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards in the ordinance. The City's discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit is limited to whether or not the proposed application meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the conditional use permit. Scanlan Variance and CUP 6. ANALYSIS: A. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Variance Request The applicant is requesting approval a variance for the property located at 17530 Henna Avenue North for the property to have 0 feet from street frontage, where 300 feet is required by ordinance. The property is an existing land locked parcel. The Planning Commission must review the requested variances with the standards outlined in Section 90-38 of the land use regulations. Staff used these standards to review the variance request and finds the following: (1) Law. The variance as requested is permissible by law. The proposed variance is permissible by law. (2) Practical Difficulties. The applicant for a variance shall establish that there are practical difficulties in complying with the provisions of the zoning regulations. The term "Practical Difficulties" as used in the granting of a variance means: a. Reasonable Use. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance and; The applicant is proposing to use the property for a single family home. This is reasonable use of the property as it is consistent with how the property has been used for several years. b. Unique Circumstances. The plight of property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner and; Parcel A has a separate tax identification number and has been used as a separate parcel for several years. Although the property has a covenant against it to be combined with parcel C, it is unique in that is has a home on it and has been used as a separate parcels for several years. c. Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The variance will not noticeably change the character of the area. It is in staff s opinion that there are practical difficulties in meeting the ordinance standards. Scanlan Variance and CUP (3) Spirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this chapter and with the policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to ensure parcels in the FUS zoning have adequate street frontage for access to the parcel. The property does have approval to cross parcel B with a shared driveway to access the parcel. The property has adequate access to a public street and meets the spirit and intent of the ordinance. (4) Prohibited Use. The variance, if granted, shall not have the effect of allowing any use prohibited in the district. The use is allowed in the FUS zoning district. (S) Hazard Consideration. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood protection than required by this chapter. The variance shall be determined the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief, and the variance shall not be issued within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. The property is not located within a floodplain area. (6) Septic and Well Compliance. The sewage treatment system and water system of the subject property is in compliance with city and state codes. The property is served by well and a septic system. CUP Request The applicant is also requesting approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) for shared driveway that provides access to 3 parcels, parcels A, B, and C (17530 Henna Avenue North, 17590 Henna Avenue North, and 7355 177t' Street North,). Shared driveways require approval of a CUP. The shared driveway is already established and has been used to access the properties for several years. Staff used these standards to review the application and found that the request meets all applicable standards as follows: 1. The proposed use is permissible by law. The proposed use is allowed by conditional use permit. 2. The proposed use is keeping with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. The proposed use is allowed in the FUS zoning district and will keep with the spirit and intent of the ordinance, which is intended to allow a shared driveway by a CUP as long as they comply with the regulations. Scanlan Variance and CUP 3. The proposed use is compatible with the City s Comprehensive Plan and the character of the surrounding area. The use is existing and is compatible with the Comprehensive Plan and the addition will not alter the character of the area. 4. The proposed use has adequate drainage, water supply, electrical, gas, and sewage treatment facilities. The proposed use has adequate drainage, water supply, and utilities. 5. The proposed use has adequate road access. The property has adequate road access to Henna Avenue North. 6. Technical Evaluation of Floodplain. The applicant is not proposing to impact any floodplain. 7. The proposed use should not increase the potential for flood damage. The proposed use would not obstruct the floodplain or increase the potential for flooding. 8. The proposed use will not damage or reduce the benefits the public receives from public waters. The proposed use would not damage or reduce the benefits from any public waters. 9. The use of watercraft on public waters. The proposed use would not involve the use of watercraft on public waters. 10. All structures shall be screened from view of public waters. The proposed use is not visible from public waters. 11. Wetland impacts. The driveway is existing and does not adversely impact any wetlands. 12. All state and local permits shall be acquired for the conditional use. The applicant would be responsible for obtaining all state and local permits. Scanlan Variance and CUP 13. Adequate screening and buffering from non -compatible uses and public rights -of -way. The proposed use is not visible from non -compatible uses and public right-of-ways. It's in staff s opinion that the request meets all the items required to approve a CUP. It is a condition of approval that the easement area and maintenance agreement will need to be reviewed and approved for the existing driveway. 7. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: It's in staff s opinion that the request meets all the items required for a variance and CUP. Staff recommends approval of the variance and CUP subject to the conditions listed in the resolutions. Staff recommends approval of the release of the covenant against parcel A and C, if the variance and CUP are approved with the conditions listed in the resolutions. 8. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission agreed that the applications met the criteria necessary to approve the variance and CUP requests and recommended approval of the applications to the City Council, subject to the conditions listed the resolutions. The Planning Commission also recommended approval of the release of the covenant against parcel 7355 177th Street North and 17530 Henna Avenue North, if the variance and CUP are approved with the conditions listed in the resolutions. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Approving Resolutions (3) IT' , T �CFFY OF VVEST.1806 A, p 6 WAT" 5 oo i a 9 0 alml r - - W-r� I 4 #flYyd S l W . TY . r<: Subject Properties Roads Scanlon Variance and CUP Request Location Map Hugo, MN Hugo Border Parcel Boundary N 0 500 Feet 1 in = 500 feet RESOLUTION 2020- APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE STREET FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS FOR A PARCEL LOCATED AT 17530 HENNA AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, Wayne Scanlan has requested approval of a variance request to allow a parcel to have 0 feet of road frontage, where 300 feet is required by ordinance for the property legally described as follows: See Attached WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said variance at a duly called public hearing on December 19, 2019, and recommends approval with the following findings and conditions: 1. Parcel ID 03.031.21.32.0002 and 04.031.21.41.0002 shall be combined into one lot. 2. The proposed variance is permissible by law. 3. The applicant is proposing to use the property for a single family home. This is reasonable use of the property as it is consistent with how the properties have been used for several years. 4. Parcel A has a separate tax identification number and has been used as a separate parcel for several years. Although the property has a covenant against it to be combined with parcel C, it is unique in that is has a home on it and has been used as a separate parcels for several years. 5. The variance will not noticeably change the character of the area. 6. There are practical difficulties in meeting the ordinance standards. 7. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to ensure parcels in the FUS zoning have adequate street frontage for access to the parcel. The property does have approval cross parcel B with a shared driveway to access the parcel. The property has adequate access to a public street and meets the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 8. The property is not located within a floodplain area. 9. The property is served by well and a septic system. Resolution 2020- Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the variance request for Wayne Scanlan to allow a parcel to have 0 feet of road frontage, where 300 feet is required by ordinance. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6�h day of January, 2020 Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Legal Description That part of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 3, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying West of the East 665 feet thereof. Excluding Horseshoe Lake. Including all Riparian Rights. Subject to and together with any other valid easements, restrictions and reservations. RESOLUTION 2020- APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A SHARED DRIVEWAY FOR THE PROPERTIES GENERALY LOCATED SOUTH OF 177TH STREET NORTH AND WEST OF HENNA AVENUE WHEREAS, Wayne Scanlan, Jodie Alwin, and Brent and Jane Krause have requested approval of a conditional use permit to allow a shared driveway for the properties generally located at 7355 177t' Street North, 17530 Henna Avenue North, and 17590 Henna Avenue. WHEREAS, the subject properties are legally described as follows: (See attached) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said conditional use permit at a duly called public hearing on December 19, 2019, and recommends approval subject to the conditions listed in the conditional use permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the conditional use permit for a shared driveway on properties located at 7355 1771h Street North, 17530 Henna Avenue North, and 17590 Henna Avenue. subject to the following conditions; 1. The Easement and Maintenance Agreement for the shared driveway shall be recorded at Washington County. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6ffi day of January 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Legal Descriptions —CUP Parcel A That part of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 3, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying West of the East 665 feet thereof. Excluding Horseshoe Lake. Including all Riparian Rights. Parcel B The East 665 feet of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 3, Township 31, North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota. Subject to Henna Avenue North. Subject to an easement for ingress and egress over and across the North 40 feet of the South 135 feet of the above described parcel. Subject to and together with any other valid easements, restrictions and reservations. Parcel C Government Lots one (1) and two (2) of Section four (4), Township Thirty-one {31), Range twenty-one (21) West, Washington County, Minnesota, containing fifty-five (551 acres more or less, according to the Government survey thereof, EXCEPT THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING: That part of Government Lot two (2), Section four (4), Township thirty-one (31) North, Range twenty- one (21) West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the Northeast corner of Government Lot two (2), Section four (4); thence West along the north line of Government Lot two (2), a distance of nine hundred twenty-five and three hundredths {925.3) feet more or less, to the point of intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant nine hundred twenty-five (925) feet West of the East line of Government Lot two (2); thence continuing West along the North line of Government Lot two (2) a distance of three hundred ninety-four (394) feet, more or less, to the West line of Government Lot two (2) thence Southerly along the West line of Government Lot two (2), a distance of seven hundred forty-five (745) feet, more or less, to the shoreline of Horseshoe Lake; thence Easterly and Northeasterly along the shoreline of Horseshoe Lake a distance of four hundred and twenty (420) feet, more or less, to the point of intersection with said line drawn parallel with and distant nine hundred twenty-five (925) feet West of the East line of Government Lot two (2), thence Northerly along said parallel line distance of six hundred twenty-three (623) feet more or less, to the point of beginning, containing 6.5 acres more or less, and subject to an existing township road along the North line thereof. RESOLUTION NO.2020- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE RELEASE OF THE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANT FOR A PROPERTIES LOCATED GENERALLY SOUTH OF 177TH STREET NORTH AND WEST OF HENNA AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, on March 7, 1994, the City Council approved a minor subdivision of a twenty acre parcel into two ten acre parcels; WHEREAS, the approval required the combination of the parcels legally described below; See attached WHEREAS, Washington County declined the parcel combination; WHEREAS, on February 21, 1995, the City Council approved and entered into a development agreement and restrictive covenant which states that the properties shall be considered as one lot and cannot be sold separate and the document is recorded in Washington County as document number 840822; WHEREAS, the properties have been used and taxed as separate parcels; WHEREAS, the property owner has requested the properties be released from the development agreement and restrictive covenant; WHEREAS, on January 6, 2020, the property owner received approval of a variance and conditional use permit from the City Council; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUGO: 1. The properties are released from the development agreement and restrictive covenant. Council members voting AYE: Council members voting NAY: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted this 61h day of January, 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Parcel A That part of the South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 3, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, lying west of the East 665 feet thereof. Also that part of Government Lot 1 of said Section 3, described as follows: Beginning at the west quarter corner of Section 3; thence southerly, along the west line of Section 3, a distance of 356 feet; thence northeasterly, deflecting 144 degrees 55 minutes to the left, a distance of 435 feet, more or less, to the east -west quarter line of Section 3; thence westerly, along said quarter line, a distance of 250 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning. Excluding Horseshoe Lake. Including all Riparian Rights. Together with an easement for ingress and egress over and across the East 665 feet of North 40 of the South 135 feet of said South Half of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter. Subject to and together with any other valid easements, restrictions and reservations. Parcel B The East 665 feet of the South Half of the southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter, Section 3, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota. Subject to Henna Avenue North. Subject to an easement for ingress and egress over and across the North 40 feet of the South 135 feet of the above described parcel. Subject to and together with any other valid easements, restrictions and reservations. Parcel C Government Lot 1, Section 4, Township 31, Range 21, Hugo, Washington County, Minnesota. O Government Lot 2, Section 4, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota, EXCEPT: That part of Government Lot Two (2), Section Four (4), Township Thirty -One (31) North, Range Twenty -One (21) West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows:_ Commencing at the Northeast corner of- Government Lot Two (2), Section Four (4); thence West along the north line of Government Lot Two ( 2) , a distance of Nine Hundred Twenty -Five and Three Hundredths (925.3) feet more or less, to the point of intersection with a line drawn parallel with and distant Nine Hundred Twenty -Five (925) feet West of the East line of Government Lot Two (2) ; thence continuing West along the North line of Government Lot Two ( 2 ) a distance of Three Hundred Ninety -Four (394) feet, more or less, to the West line of Government Lot Two (2), thence Southerly along the west line of Government Lot Two (2), a distance of Seven Hundred Forty -- Five (745) feet, more or less, to the shoreline of Horseshoe Lake; thence Easterly and Northeasterly along the shoreline of Horseshoe Lake a distance of Four Hundred and Twenty (420) feet, more or less, to the point of intersection with said line drawn parallel with and distant Nine Hundred Twenty-five ( 925 ) feet West of the East line of Government Lot Two ( 2) ; thence Northerly along said parallel line a distance of Six Hundred Twenty -Three (623) feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, containing 6.5 acres, more or less, and subject to an existing township road along the North line thereof. RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT AND SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE 2020 GOODVIEW AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted October 21, 2019, a report was prepared by WSB. with reference to the improvement of Goodview Avenue from the southern City border to Egg Lake Road (137th Street/County Road 8; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to include reclaiming the existing bituminous pavement, minor subgrade corrections, minor drainage improvements, and bituminous paving along Goodview Avenue from the southern City border to Egg Lake Road (137th Street/County Road 8 and to assess benefited properties for all or a portion of the improvement, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. WHEREAS, the City Council has been advised by the City Engineer that said street improvements are feasible, and should best be made as proposed, and the City Engineer's report to this effect has heretofore been received by Council, and filed with the City Clerk on January 6th, 2020; and WHEREAS, the City Council deemed it necessary and expedient that the City of Hugo, Minnesota, construct certain improvements, to -wit: 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project, in the City as described in and in accordance with the feasibility report prepared by the City Engineer; and WHEREAS, the statute provided that no such improvements shall be made until the Council has held a public hearing on such improvements following mailed notice and two publications thereof in the official newspaper stating time and place of the hearing, the general nature of the improvement, the estimated costs thereof, and the area proposed to be assessed, in accordance with the law; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Hugo that the public hearing be scheduled to consider 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project, to be held on Monday, February 3, 2020, at 7:00 o'clock p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible, at Hugo City Hall, 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North. Council members voting AYE: Council members voting NAY: Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted this 6th day of January 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk FEASIBILITY REPORT 2020 GOODVIEW AVENUE IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT CITY OF HUGO I WASHINGTON COUNTY I MINNESOTA JANUARY 6, 2020 Prepared for: City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 WSB PROJECT NO. R-014873-000 wsb FEASIBILITY REPORT 2020 GOODVIEW AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FOR THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA WASHINGTON COUNTY January 6, 2020 Prepared By: wsb Feasibility Report 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. R-014873-000 2 0 U 0. Z W CO U) 0 00 LO M a LO LO J 0 d Q W Z Z 2 0 0 CO CO J W D Z W Q Q Z W X 0 wsb January 6, 2020 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Feasibility Report 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. R-014873-000 Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council Members: Transmitted herewith for your review is a feasibility report which addresses improvements associated with the 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project. We would be happy to discuss this report with you at your convenience. Please contact me at (651) 286-8463 if you have any questions or concerns. Sincerely, WSB Mark A. Erichson, PE City Engineer Attachment CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that this plan, specification, or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly licensed professional engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. � 1<dlL--��� Kris Keller, PE Date: January 6, 2020 Quality Control Review Completed By: Mark Erichson PE Date: January 6, 2020 Lic. No. 50087 Lic. No. 40886 Feasibility Report 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. R-014873-000 TABLE OF CONTENTS TITLE SHEET LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL CERTIFICATION SHEET TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..................................................................................................1 2. INTRODUCTION............................................................................................................... 2 2.1 Authorization.........................................................................................................2 2.2 Scope.................................................................................................................... 2 2.3 Data Available....................................................................................................... 2 2.4 Project History.......................................................................................................2 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS..................................................................................................2 3.1 Surface.................................................................................................................. 2 3.2 Drainage................................................................................................................3 3.3 Private Utilities.......................................................................................................3 3.4 Sanitary Sewer...................................................................................................... 3 3.5 Watermain............................................................................................................. 3 4. PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS........................................................................................3 4.1 Surface.................................................................................................................. 3 4.1.1 Roadway....................................................................................................3 4.1.2 Trails..........................................................................................................4 4.2 Drainage Improvements........................................................................................4 4.3 Utility Improvements..............................................................................................4 4.4 Right-of-Way/Easements...................................................................................... 5 4.5 Permits/Approvals................................................................................................. 5 4.6 Construction Access/Staging................................................................................ 5 5. FINANCING......................................................................................................................5 5.1 Opinion of Probable Cost...................................................................................... 5 5.2 Funding.................................................................................................................6 5.2 Preliminary Assessment Roll................................................................................. 6 6. NECESSITY AND EFFECTIVENESS.............................................................................. 6 7. PROJECT SCHEDULE....................................................................................................7 8. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION.......................................................................7 Appendix A Figure 1 — Project Location Map Figure 2 — Typical Section Appendix B Opinion of Probable Cost Appendix C Assessment Map Preliminary Assessment Roll Appendix D Geotechnical Report Feasibility Report 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. R-014873-000 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project consists of roadway improvements on Goodview Avenue North from the southern city border to Egg Lake Road/137t" Street/County Road 8. A map illustrating the project location is shown on Figure 1 in Appendix A. Improvements throughout the project include bituminous pavement reclamation, minor subgrade corrections, and minor drainage improvements, with grading and culvert replacement only as necessary to address isolated drainage issues. Roadway options were considered during preliminary design. Option 1 consists of bituminous reclamation and paving at the existing widths; the second option, is bituminous reclamation and paving with minor shoulder widening. The cost of Option 1 is estimated at $1,320,000. Option 2 is estimated at $1,540,000 These project costs include a 10% contingency and 25% indirect costs. Funding for the project will consist of special assessments, City Street CIP Funds, and State Aid Funds. The project schedule proposed includes construction beginning as early as May 2020, with final completion by the fall of 2020. The duration of the project is approximately two months with flexibility provided to the contractor on the start date to maximize project interest and minimize project costs. This project is feasible, necessary, and cost-effective from an engineering standpoint and should be constructed as proposed herein. Feasibility Report 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. R-014873-000 Page 1 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 Authorization On October 21, 2019, the Hugo City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility report for the 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project. 2.2 Scope This feasibility report includes street improvements and minor drainage improvements along the following roadways: ■ Goodview Avenue North from the southern municipal limits to Egg Lake Road 2.3 Data Available Information and materials used in the preparation of this report include the following: ■ City of Hugo Capital Improvement Plan ■ City of Hugo Assessment Policy Manual ■ City of Hugo Property Index Records • City of Hugo Topography Maps • Pavement Cores/Soil Borings ■ Topographic Survey ■ Field Observations of the Area 2.4 Project History The 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project is identified in the City's Capital Improvement Plan to address the poor condition of the roadway. The City held a neighborhood meeting on November 20, 2019, to receive input on the project. The majority of the meeting attendees stated there was a need for the project and supported the proposed improvements. Many in attendance expressed concern regarding the speed and care with which drivers are currently using on Goodview Avenue as well as on the connecting cross streets approaching Goodview Avenue. 3. EXISTING CONDITIONS 3.1 Surface Goodview Avenue North is currently 24' in width, with some areas having dedicated public right of ways and others where we have prescriptive rights (areas we have used and maintained for a minimum of 6 years). The total length of roadway included in the project is 9,300 feet, or 1.76 miles. 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project Existing Conditions Street Segment From To Length Existing Width Curb Goodview Avenue North Southern Municipal Limits Egg Lake Road 9,300' 24' None Feasibility Report 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. R-014873-000 Page 2 Goodview Avenue had improvements in the 1970's, 80's, and early 90's. Since then, pavement conditions have aged and are exhibiting distresses such as transverse and longitudinal cracking, pavement rutting, and a fallen cross slope, with surfaces rated as fair to poor. 3.2 Drainage Runoff is currently collected by the existing drainage ditches. Culverts are located across sections of the roadways as well as across many of the driveways to convey runoff into adjacent wetland areas. 3.3 Private Utilities Private utilities that have facilities in or near the project area will be notified during the final design phase of the project and will be requested to coordinate any necessary repairs and replacements as needed at their cost. Private utility companies that have facilities within the project area include the following: ■ Comcast (Cable) ■ CenturyLink (Telecom) ■ Koch Pipelines (Oil) ■ Xcel Energy (Electric/Gas) ■ Zayo Bandwidth (Telecom) 3.4 Sanitary Sewer The properties within the project area are served by private sanitary systems. 3.5 Watermain The properties within the project area are served by private water systems. 4. PROPOSEDIMPROVEMENTS 4.1 Surface 4.1.1 Roadway Two roadway design options were considered for this report. Both options proposed for the project area include the reclamation of the existing asphalt pavement and aggregate base with only minor subgrade corrections as needed with the roadway remaining a rural section. The base roadway option considered for Goodview Avenue, Option 1, is to match the existing 24-foot width. With this option, the roadway would be reclaimed and paved at the same width as the existing roadway, with only minor improvements to the existing shoulder to meet State Aid Standards. The layout of the roadway would include two 11-foot driving lanes and two 1-foot-wide paved shoulders, with a rural typical section. This option minimizes both cost and construction impact to the adjacent properties; however, it does not provide any extra shoulder space for bikers or pedestrians. The second roadway option considered, Option 2, is to widen the existing rural section from a 24-foot width to a 26-foot width. The layout of the roadway would include two 11-foot driving lanes and two 2- foot-wide paved shoulders with a rural typical section. This option provides a somewhat wider and safer route for pedestrians or bicyclists; however, the option would be more expensive than replacing in kind Feasibility Report 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. R-014873-000 Page 3 and would require grading work on the adjoining roadway back slopes and ditches. Estimates to widen the roadway have been included; however, staff will need to work with MNDOT staff to determine if this would still be characterized as a reconditioning project or a reconstruction project. The differentiation is outlined below: Reconditioning Project — "Reconditioning" includes resurfacing, replacement, or rehabilitation of the pavement structure to extend the life of the roadway and effectively address critical safety and operations needs through minor improvements to the existing facility. Reconditioning projects generally utilize the existing horizontal and vertical alignment, may entail minor widening or geometric improvement, and normally require little or no additional right-of-way. Reconditioning may include changes in vertical or horizontal alignment involving no more than 20 percent of the length of the project. Reconditioning may include curb replacement along no more than 20 percent of the length of the project, not including curb replacement for purposes of meeting the Americans with Disabilities Act requirements. Work does not normally extend beyond the existing ditch bottom. Reconstruction Project — "Reconstruction" means the replacement of an existing roadway on a similar alignment. Minimum design standard for Goodview Avenue would be 32-ft wide. This would have significant impacts on wetlands, drainage ditches, and costs. Typical roadway sections are included in Figure 2 in Appendix A. Both options will consider improvements at the intersection of Goodview Avenue and 125"' Street to address vehicular accidents resulting from 1251h Street westbound vehicles sliding through the intersection during slippery conditions. With speeds being such a concern on this roadway, staff have included driver feedback signs in the cost estimate to help change driver's behavior on the roadway. 4.1.2 Trails The City of Hugo's Comprehensive Plan identifies a trail along the west side of Goodview Avenue. Installation of a trail with this project would not qualify as a "reconditioning project" which is the recommended type of improvement project for Goodview Avenue. This trail improvement would also require additional right of way and may be better suited to be constructed at the time the properties along the west side of Goodview Avenue are developed with municipal services. Trail improvements are not recommended with the Goodview Avenue Improvement Project. 4.2 Drainage Improvements The existing drainage systems will be maintained, and culverts replaced as needed with only minor drainage improvements to accommodate the proposed roadway alignment. Existing vertical and horizontal alignments will be maintained to the greatest extent possible. 4.3 Utility Improvements The City of Hugo's Comprehensive Plan does include both sanitary sewer and watermain along Goodview Avenue to service parcels within the municipal urban service area which is predominantly along the west side of Goodview Avenue. The extension of municipal services will be driven by development and will likely be extended outside of Goodview Avenue through developments where feasible. Feasibility Report 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. R-014873-000 Page 4 4.4 Right-of-Way/Easements There is little right-of-way along Goodview Avenue; however, proposed improvements will be completed within those areas or where the City has prescriptive rights, so no acquisitions are proposed at this time. 4.5 Permits/Approvals The anticipated permits and approvals required, and the respective regulatory agencies are listed below: ■ City of Hugo........................................................................... RCWD Permit/Wetlands ■ MN Pollution Control Agency NPDES........................................... Erosion/Stormwater 4.6 Construction Access/Staging The contractor will be responsible for providing access to all properties throughout the project. The proposed methods of pavement rehabilitation will typically allow residents to drive on the roadway surface during construction. Adequately signed detours will be identified to direct traffic around the construction zones and notify users of the increased truck and construction activity. Detours will be used only if absolutely necessary to ensure the safety of residents and construction workers alike. 5. FINANCING 5.1 Opinion of Probable Cost A detailed opinion of probable cost is included in Appendix B of this report. The opinion of probable cost is based on projected construction costs for 2020 and includes a 10% contingency and 25% indirect costs. The indirect costs include engineering, legal, and administrative costs associated with the project. The project costs are summarized as follows: 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project Option 1: Street Improvements — Match Existing Pavement Width (24-foot) Cost Summary Street Improvements $1,195,000 Drainage Improvements $125,000 TOTAL $1,320,000 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project Option 2: Street Improvements — Widen Roadway (26-foot) Cost Summary Street Improvements $1,415,000 Drainage Improvements $125,000 TOTAL $1,540,000 Feasibility Report 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. R-014873-000 Page 5 5.2 Funding Funding for the project will be provided through assessments to benefiting properties, City Street Funds, and the City's Municipal State Aid Funds. Grant funding, if available, will be pursued for the project during final design. The proposed funding is outlined as follows: 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project Option 1: Street Improvements — Match Existing Pavement Width (24-foot) Funding Assessments CIP/State Aid Funds Total Funding Street Improvements $166,000 $1,029,000 $1,195,000 Drainage Improvements $0 $125,000 $125,000 TOTAL $166,000 $1,154,000 $1,320,000 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project Option 2: Street Improvements — Widen Roadway (26-foot) Cost Summary Assessments CIP/State Aid Funds Total Funding Street Improvements $166,000 $1,249,000 $1,415,000 Drainage Improvements $0 $125,000 $125,000 TOTAL $166,000 $1,374,000 $1,540,000 5.2 Preliminary Assessment Roll Assessments will be levied to the benefiting properties as outlined in Minnesota Statute 429 and the City's Assessment Policy. A detailed preliminary assessment roll is included in Appendix C. The assessment rate for roadway reclamation projects is as follows: ■ Rural Roadway Reclamation $3,400/unit Properties adjacent to the two roadways, will be assessed only for 1/2 of a unit per street. If only one of the roadways adjacent to a property is being reclaimed, the total assessment will be only 1/2 of a unit at this time. Similarly, properties with footage adjacent to three roadways, will be assessed 1/3 of a unit per street. If only one street is being reclaimed, the total assessment will be only 1/3 of a unit. There are 5 properties (east side of Goodview Avenue just south of Greystone Ave. N) using a shared driveway with their only access coming from Goodview Avenue. Consistent with past practices, each of these properties are also subject to the City assessment policy. 6. NECESSITY AND EFFECTIVENESS The improvements proposed in this study are necessary, cost-effective, and feasible. The reconstruction of the streets provides the City with a cost-effective means of continuing the City's street improvement efforts and providing an adequate means of transportation for local residents. These improvements will provide a longer lasting street section needing less maintenance over the expected service life. The proposed improvements constitute a project large enough to provide a competitive bidding environment, economy of scale, and are therefore deemed to be cost-effective. Feasibility Report 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. R-014873-000 Page 6 Based on the information contained within this report, the proposed improvements as described can be considered to be necessary, cost-effective, and feasible from an engineering standpoint. 7. PROJECT SCHEDULE The proposed schedule for the 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project is as follows: Authorize Preparation of Feasibility Report ...................... Neighborhood Meeting (Complete) .................................. Receive Feasibility Report ................................................ Public Hearing/Consider Ordering Project ....................... Plans and Specifications Preparation ............................... Neighborhood Open House with Plans ............................ Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Bidding Project Bid Opening.......................................................... Award Construction Contract ............................................ Construction...................................................................... Assessment Hearing........................................................ 8. FEASIBILITY AND RECOMMENDATION ....October 21, 2019 November 20, 2019 ......January 6, 2019 .... February 3, 2020 February/March 2020 .....March 2020 .....March 2020 April/May 2020 April/May 2020 May — September 2020 October 2020 The 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project consists of pavement improvements, spot subgrade corrections, culvert replacements and minor drainage improvements. The estimated cost of the street improvement project is $1,320,000 for Option 1. Option 2, which involves additional widening of the road for additional pedestrian and bicycle safety, would have an estimated cost of $1,540,000. Based on the information contained within this report, the proposed improvements as described can be considered necessary, cost-effective, and feasible from an engineering perspective. WSB recommends construction of the proposed improvements as detailed in this report. The economic feasibility of this project will be determined by the City Council. Feasibility Report 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. R-014873-000 Page 7 APPENDIX A Figure 1 — Project Location Map Figure 2 — Typical Section Feasibility Report 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. R-014873-000 - ■� IIIIIi� ��e� Aw � o 1������ ♦ �1in =11 111111�11 Q11111111\11\11 �` �� ° I Project Location �cl-F Tom, ^ Project Location Map N FGT.'A°s Goodview Ave Project Limits o 1,000 WS b, Feet Hugo, MN A 1 inch = 1,000 feet TYPICAL STREET SECTION EXISTING WIDTHS ROADWAY 24' PAVED V GRAVEL SHOULDER 11' LANE 11' LANE V GRAVEL SHOULDER 1'PAVED 1'PAVED SHOULDER SHOULDER 3% 3% FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION - 1-1/2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE BITUMINOUS TACK COAT - 2 1/2" BITUMINOUS NON -WEARING COURSE 8" RECLAIMED/AGGREGATE MATERIAL APPROVED SUBGRADE TYPICAL STREET SECTION ALTERNATE 1 - STREET WIDENING ROADWAY 26' PAVED 1' GRAVEL SHOULDER 11' LANE 11' LANE V GRAVEL SHOULDER 2'PAVED 2'PAVED SHOULDER SHOULDER - 3% 3% - FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION wsb 1-1/2" BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE BITUMINOUS TACK COAT - 2 1/2" BITUMINOUS NON -WEARING COURSE 8" RECLAIMED/AGGREGATE MATERIAL APPROVED SUBGRADE 2020 GOODVIEW AVENUE IMPROVEMENT PROJECT FIGURE 2 WSB PROJECT NO.: I CITY OF HUGO, MN 014873-000 APPENDIX B Opinion of Probable Cost Feasibility Report 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. R-014873-000 STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES Item No. MN/DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost OPTION 1: STREET IMPROVEMENTS - MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT WIDTH (24-FOOT) 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION L S 1 $46,500.00 $46,500.00 2 2101.524 CLEARING TREE 5 $450.00 $2,250.00 3 2101.524 GRUBBING TREE 5 $450.00 $2,250.00 4 2104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 400 $3.00 $1,200.00 5 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 30 $6.00 $180.00 6 2104.523 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOX EACH 42 $50.00 $2,100.00 7 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) L F 490 $10.00 $4,900.00 8 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 200 $4.00 $800.00 9 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT S Y 30 $8.00 $240.00 10 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON (P) C Y 600 $12.00 $7,200.00 11 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE (P) C Y 1700 $12.00 $20,400.00 12 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV) (P) C Y 1700 $18.00 $30,600.00 13 2105.603 DITCH CLEANING L F 200 $100.00 $20,000.00 14 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION ROAD STA 94 $200.00 $18,800.00 15 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 20 $150.00 $3,000.00 16 2130.523 WATER MGAL 10 $65.00 $650.00 17 2211.507 SHOULDERING C Y 240 $28.00 $6,720.00 18 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 C Y 100.0 $28.00 $2,800.00 19 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION S Y 25000 $3.00 $75,000.00 20 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 1400 $3.50 $4,900.00 21 2331.601 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 450 $40.00 $18,000.00 22 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) TON 2500 $75.00 $187,500.00 23 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) TON 4100 $75.00 $307,500.00 24 2501.502 12" RC PIPE APRON EACH 2 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 25 2501.502 15" RC PIPE APRON EACH 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 26 2501.502 24" RC PIPE APRON EACH 6 $2,000.00 $12,000.00 27 2501.502 36" RC PIPE APRON EACH 2 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 28 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 12" PIPE APRON EACH 2 $550.00 $1,100.00 29 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 15" PIPE APRON EACH 6 $550.00 $3,300.00 30 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 24" PIPE APRON EACH 6 $800.00 $4,800.00 31 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 36" PIPE APRON EACH 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 32 2503.503 12" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 45 $48.00 $2,160.00 33 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 162 $55.00 $8,910.00 34 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 222 $65.00 $14,430.00 35 2503.503 36" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 59 $100.00 $5,900.00 36 2511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III C Y 50 $200.00 $10,000.00 37 2531.504 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 100 $65.00 $6,500.00 38 2540.602 MAILBOX SUPPORT EACH 2 $100.00 $200.00 39 2540.602 MAILBOX (TEMPORARY) EACH 42 $50.00 $2,100.00 40 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 41 2564.602 SIGN PANELS TYPE SPECIAL S F 9 $75.00 $675.00 42 2564.602 DRIVER FEEDBACK SIGN EACH 4 $12,500.00 $50,000.00 43 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LIN FT 500 $3.50 $1,750.00 44 2573.501 STABLIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT L S 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 45 2575.508 SEED MIX TYPE 25-131 LBS 400 $3.50 $1,400.00 46 2575.508 HYDRAULIC MULCH MATRIX POUND 3800 $2.00 $7,600.00 47 2575.605 SEEDING (INCL. TOPSOIL & FERT) ACRE 1.5 $5,000.00 $7,500.00 48 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP L F 1390 $1.25 $1,737.50 49 2582.503 4" DBLE SOLID LINE MULTI COMP L F 7260 $1.75 $12,705.00 50 125TH STREET UPGRADES L S 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 TOTAL OPTION 1: SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS - MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT WIDTH (24-FOOT) $959,657.50 + 10% CONTINGENCY $95,965.75 SUBTOTAL OPTION 1: SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS - MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT WIDTH (24-FOOT) $1,055,623.25 + 25% INDIRECT COSTS $263,905.81 TOTAL OPTION 1: SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS - MATCH EXISTING PAVEMENT WIDTH (24-FOOT) $1,319,529.06 K:\014873-000\Quantity\Preliminary\014560-000 OPC Feas Final 010220 1 of 2 STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES Item No. MN/DOT Specification No. Description Unit Estimated Total Quantity Estimated Unit Price Estimated Total Cost OPTION 2: STREET IMPROVEMENTS - WIDEN ROADWAY (26-FOOT) 1 2021.501 MOBILIZATION L S 1 $53,300.00 $53,300.00 2 2101.524 CLEARING TREE 10 $450.00 $4,500.00 3 2101.524 GRUBBING TREE 10 $450.00 $4,500.00 4 2104.503 SAWING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 400 $3.00 $1,200.00 5 2104.503 SAWING CONCRETE PAVEMENT (FULL DEPTH) L F 30 $6.00 $180.00 6 2104.523 SALVAGE AND REINSTALL MAILBOX EACH 42 $50.00 $2,100.00 7 2104.503 REMOVE SEWER PIPE (STORM) L F 490 $10.00 $4,900.00 8 2104.504 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT S Y 200 $2.50 $500.00 9 2104.504 REMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENT S Y 30 $6.00 $180.00 10 2106.507 EXCAVATION - COMMON (P) C Y 1530 $12.00 $18,360.00 11 2106.507 EXCAVATION - SUBGRADE (P) C Y 4500 $12.00 $54,000.00 12 2106.507 SELECT GRANULAR EMBANKMENT (CV) (P) C Y 4500 $18.00 $81,000.00 13 2105.603 DITCH CLEANING L F 200 $100.00 $20,000.00 14 2112.519 SUBGRADE PREPARATION ROAD STA 94 $150.00 $14,100.00 15 2123.610 STREET SWEEPER (WITH PICKUP BROOM) HOUR 20 $150.00 $3,000.00 16 2130.523 WATER MGAL 10 $65.00 $650.00 17 2211.507 SHOULDERING C Y 240 $30.00 $7,200.00 18 2211.507 AGGREGATE BASE (CV) CLASS 5 C Y 1000 $28.00 $28,000.00 18 2215.504 FULL DEPTH RECLAMATION S Y 25000 $2.50 $62,500.00 19 2357.506 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GALLON 1400 $3.50 $4,900.00 20 2331.601 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 450 $40.00 $18,000.00 21 2360.509 TYPE SP 9.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) TON 2700 $75.00 $202,500.00 22 2360.509 TYPE SP 12.5 WEARING COURSE MIX (2,C) TON 4400 $75.00 $330,000.00 23 2501.502 12" RC PIPE APRON EACH 2 $1,250.00 $2,500.00 24 2501.502 15" RC PIPE APRON EACH 6 $1,500.00 $9,000.00 25 2501.502 24" RC PIPE APRON EACH 6 $2,000.00 $12,000.00 26 2501.502 36" RC PIPE APRON EACH 2 $2,500.00 $5,000.00 27 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 12" PIPE APRON EACH 2 $550.00 $1,100.00 28 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 15" PIPE APRON EACH 6 $550.00 $3,300.00 29 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 24" PIPE APRON EACH 6 $800.00 $4,800.00 30 2501.602 TRASH GUARD FOR 36" PIPE APRON EACH 2 $1,200.00 $2,400.00 31 2503.503 12" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 45 $48.00 $2,160.00 32 2503.503 15" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL V L F 162 $55.00 $8,910.00 33 1 2503.503 24" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 222 $65.00 $14,430.00 34 2503.503 36" RC PIPE SEWER DES 3006 CL III L F 59 $100.00 $5,900.00 35 2511.507 RANDOM RIPRAP CLASS III C Y 50 $200.00 $10,000.00 36 2531.507 6" CONCRETE DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT S Y 100 $65.00 $6,500.00 37 2540.602 MAILBOX SUPPORT EACH 2 $100.00 $200.00 38 2540.602 MAILBOX (TEMPORARY) EACH 42 $50.00 $2,100.00 39 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL L S 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 40 2564.602 SIGN PANELS TYPE SPECIAL S F 9 $75.00 $675.00 41 2564.602 DRIVER FEEDBACK SIGN EACH 4 $12,500.00 $50,000.00 42 2573.503 SEDIMENT CONTROL LOG TYPE WOOD FIBER LIN FT 500 $3.50 $1,750.00 43 2573.501 STABLIZED CONSTRUCTION EXIT L S 1 $2,500.00 $2,500.00 44 2575.508 SEED MIX TYPE 25-131 LBS 500 $3.50 $1,750.00 45 2575.508 HYDRAULIC MULCH MATRIX POUND 5300 $2.00 $10,600.00 46 2575.605 SEEDING (INCL. TOPSOIL & FERT) ACRE 2.1 $5,000.00 $10,500.00 47 2582.503 4" SOLID LINE MULTI COMP L F 1390 $1.25 $1,737.50 48 2582.503 4" DBLE SOLID LINE MULTI COMP L F 7260 $1.75 $12,705.00 49 125TH STREET UPGRADES L S 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 TOTAL OPTION 2: SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS - WIDEN ROADWAY (26-FOOT) $1,118,087.50 + 10% CONTINGENCY $111,808.75 SUBTOTAL OPTION 2: SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS - WIDEN ROADWAY (26-FOOT) $1,229,896.25 + 25% INDIRECT COSTS $307,474.06 TOTAL OPTION 2: SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS - WIDEN ROADWAY (26-FOOT) $1,537,370.31 K:\014873-000\Quantity\Preliminary\014560-000 OPC Feas Final 010220 2 of 2 APPENDIX C Geotechnical Report Feasibility Report 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. R-014873-000 ws b Memorandum To: Kris Keller From: Andrea Blanchette Tom Wood Sheue Torng Lee Date: October 28, 2019 Re: Pavement Coring Forensic Report City of Hugo WSB Project No. 014873-000 2 WSB is pleased to submit this pavement forensics report detailing the results of the pavement coring which was completed on October 25, 2019 in the City of Hugo. The various characteristics c� of the pavement cores were analyzed to assist in determining the appropriate pavement W maintenance or rehabilitation method for the roadway. m A total of 13 pavement cores were obtained along Goodview Avenue North. The locations of the 0 pavement cores are summarized in Figure 1 and Figure 2. A summary of the pavement depths co and conditions, and recommended maintenance activity for the roadway are shown in Table 1. Our findings support the City's plan to perform a full depth reclamation (FDR) on Goodview co Avenue North. A partial depth mill and overlay would not be feasible based on the results of the coring, which showed that the cores were in poor condition and distresses observed on the surface of the roadway were severe. A FDR would remove all the existing distresses, and re - blend the bituminous and a portion of the aggregate as a base to re -pave over, essentially LO creating a new roadway section. Z J 0 a Q W Z Z 2 0 0 co W H U) T W Z) Z W Q Q Z W X 0 Kris Keller October 28, 2019 Page 2 Bald Eagle Sportsmen's A Association Y Core 5 • Core 4 Core 3 Core 1 • � Core 2 125Sh st N Figure 1. Pavement core locations along Goodview Avenue North between 125th Street North and the south limit of the City. Kris Keller October 28, 2019 Page 3 3dth Ln M N Core 13 73Wth St ri Core 12 • Core 11 Oneka Weddings IP and Events Core 10 • • Core 9 Core 8 • ._ Core 6 Core 7 Bald Eagle Sportsmen's Association 1zs�, st 0 0 a n { = Go - g!e Figure 2. Pavement core locations along Goodview Avenue North between Egg Lake Road North and 125th Street North. I Kris Keller October 28, 2019 Page 4 Table 1. Pavement core information and recommended maintenance or rehabilitation. Bituminous Aggregate Recommended Core ID Depth Depth 41 Notes Maintenance / (inches) inches Rehabilitation Core was in poor condition 1 4 4.5 showing deterioration. Part of the bottom of the core disintegrated. Core started showing signs of 2 3.75 3.75 deterioration, losing fines and binder. Core started showing signs of 3 3.5 5 deterioration, losing fines and binder. Core was in very poor 4 3.5 7.5 condition showing delamination and deterioration. Core was in very poor 5 3 8 condition showing delamination and deterioration. Full depth Core was in poor condition. 6 3 5 Bottom one inch of the core reclamation (FDR) disintegrated. 7 2.75 4.25 Core was in good condition. Core was in very poor condition showing 8 2.75 3.5 delamination between pavement layers and bottom of the core disintegrated. Core started showing signs of 9 3.5 5.5 deterioration, losing fines and binder. 10 3.75 5.25 Core started showing signs of deterioration. 11 3.75 5.25 Core started showing signs of deterioration. 12 3.5 6 Core started showing signs of deterioration. 13 3.75 6.75 Core was in good condition. '� Select granular material was found underlying the aggregate base at all core locations. Kris Keller October 28, 2019 Page 5 Appendix A City of Hugo Coring Photos so AOr / # f 40 10 ��)°,� !•��! A � -Z\ \_.���� � � :Jkj � \ � w" f F ' - 77 -- i 4 3 �,} x �^ I F Kris Keller October 28, 2019 Page 11 Core 6 -AA yf :5 4 5 *4 _ A f g� Kris Keller October 28, 2019 Page 13 Core 8 Kris Keller October 28, 2019 Page 14 Core 9 La" Kris Keller October 28, 2019 Page 16 Core 11 w f �5 Afi, .. .. t• - APPENDIX D Assessment Map Preliminary Assessment Roll Feasibility Report 2020 Goodview Avenue Improvement Project City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. R-014873-000 FT 0.5 IIIIWMI 41 9 M ' r�q 37 (1) �. 3 II II ��10 �`• 31 MIN MIN fo ,• �� �i �. 2`7 28 i o ,� J M 1) 25-13 1 05 14 1no (1) w 0 o 1) 17 (1) 24 (1) 19 20 , Project Location 22 1) (1) 2s Assessed Parcels (##) No. of Units Assessed a �CI-F Tom, ^ Assessment Map N 11 V(1(J Goodview Ave Project Limits o 1,000 WS b, FIST. 7806 Hugo, M NA Feet -=1 inch = 1,000 feet Preliminary Assessment Roll WSB Project: 2020 Goodview Avenue Street Improvements Project Residential Project Location: City of Hugo Single Family Rural Roadway Reclamation: $ 3,400.00 /Unit WSB Project No.: 014873-000 Date: 1012812019 MapID PIN PROPERTY ADDRESS OWNER OWNER ADDRESS UNITS NOTES ROADWAY ASSESSMENT 1 2903121140007 13580 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55038 KNEBEL MARY NORBERTA-PAMELA B 13580 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55038 0.5 $ 1,700.00 2 2903121140008 HUGO MN CITY OF HUGO 14669 FITZGERALD AVE N HUGO MN 55038-9367 1.0 Park/Municipal $ 3,400.00 3 2903121140006 13514 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55038 MANKE JAMES C & ANNE M 13514 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55038 1.0 $ 3,400.00 4 2903121410003 13452 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55038 DEAN ARDEN ATKINSON TRUST 01/31/2011 & RUBY JEAN A 13452 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55038-9452 2.0 $ 6,800.00 5 2903121410002 13300 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 KRUEGER GLENN J 13300 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 6 2903121410001 13292 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 HAGLE DENNIS S & BECKY S HAGLE 13292 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 7 2903121440002 13194 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 GLS-WBR DEV LLC & OCTAVE Z-5 LLC 9046 MOORS PLACE N DUBLIN OH 43017 1.0 $ 3,400.00 8 2903121440001 13094 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 PELTIER KEVIN T 13094 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110-6011 0.5 $ 1,700.00 9 3203121110001 HUGO MN PELTIER KEVIN T 13094 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110-6011 0.0 Vacant/Assessible $ - 10 3203121110002 12776 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 HENNING DAVID & JONI CASSERLY HENNING 12776 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 11 3203121130005 12730 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55038 PELTIER KEVIN T 13094 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110-6011 1.0 Vacant/Not Assessible (<300') $ 3,400.00 12 3203121140003 HUGO MN TJ LAND TRS CO V LLC 3050 ECHO LAKE AVE MAHTOMEDI MN 55115 1.0 Vacant/Assessible $ 3,400.00 13 3203121140002 12564 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 FASHINGBAUER EDWARD J & ANN 12564 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 14 3203121410001 12494 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 STEVENS PAMELA J 12494 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 15 3203121410003 12424 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 FORD DANIEL W & JOANN 12424 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 16 3203121410004 12360 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 PLANTENBERG FAMILY TRS 12360 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 17 3203121410005 12310 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 SAIKO NANCY 12310 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 18 3203121440007 12280 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 METTS DAMON & MELINDA 12280 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 19 3203121440005 HUGO MN GILSRUD JAMES K & KIMBERLEY M 12240 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 Vacant/Not Assessible (<300';<10 acres) $ 3,400.00 20 3203121440006 12240 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 GILSRUD JAMES K & KIMBERLEY M 12240 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 21 3203121440003 12200 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 MAKI LAURA & AARON R 12200 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 22 3203121440002 12020 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 GAHM MANDEE J & JASON L 12020 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 23 3203121440004 12125 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 WEGLEITNER EUGENE & LISA 12125 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 24 3303121320001 12317 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 AXELSON GRACE T 14602 FINALE AVE N #327 HUGO MN 55038 5.5 $ 18,700.00 25 3303121230005 HUGO MN ENGSTROM JAMES 0 & BARBARA 670 COUNTY ROAD B2 E ST PAUL MN 55117 0.5 Vacant/Assessible $ 1,700.00 26 3303121230004 12725 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 ZERWAS JAMES S 12725 GOODVIEW AVE WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 27 3303121220006 12827 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 LERFALD ARNE L & CYNTHIA A 19440 HARROW AVE FOREST LAKE MN 55025 1.0 $ 3,400.00 28 3303121220004 12821 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 FONTAINE DAVID M ETAL 12821 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 29 3303121220007 12815 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55038 GRANGER MICHAEL & ANDREA 12815 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 30 3303121220002 12833 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 STONEHOUSE GREGORY J & JULIA L 12833 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 31 3303121220001 12855 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 LARSON ROBERT A & LINDA A 12855 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 0.5 $ 1,700.00 32 3303121220003 12861 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 FRY DAVID & MONICA 12861 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 0.5 $ 1,700.00 33 3303121220009 HUGO MN HIDDEN HILLS PRESERVE HOA & % HIDDEN HILLS PRESERV 12795 GREYSTONE CT HUGO MN 55038 0.0 Vacant/Not Assessible (<10 acres) $ - 34 2803121330015 HUGO MN HIDDEN HILLS PRESERVE HOA & % HIDDEN HILLS PRESERV 12795 GREYSTONE CT HUGO MN 55038 0.0 Vacant/Not Assessible (Pond?) $ - 35 2803121330013 13125 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 SCHREIFELS DENNIS J & LINDA 13125 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 36 2803121330014 13175 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 RUPPERT JODY J 13175 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 37 2803121330001 6315 132ND ST N HUGO MN 55110 LEE PHENG & MAI D VANG 6315 132ND ST N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 0.5 $ 1,700.00 38 2803121320003 6310 132ND ST N HUGO MN 55110 BAHM RAYMOND A & BONITA K 6310 132ND ST N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 0.5 $ 1,700.00 39 2803121320004 13327 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 KEATE LYNN T 13327 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 40 2803121320005 13427 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55110 PAULSON CRAIG M & KAREN S 13427 GOODVIEW AVE N WHITE BEAR LAKE MN 55110 1.0 $ 3,400.00 41 2803121320002 13475 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55038 CONNOLLY JAMES J & BARBARA 13475 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55038 1.0 $ 3,400.00 42 2803121230001 13543 GOODVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55038 JERRY NICHOLAS & JAMIE 13543 GODOVIEW AVE N HUGO MN 55038 0.5 $ 1,700.00 TOTAL: $ 137,700.00 Agenda Number: J.1 CITY OF HUGO PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Fenway Land Company —Preliminary Plat and PUD General Plan for a residential development to be known as "Rice Lake Reserve" DATE: December 31, 2019, for the City Council meeting of January 6, 2020 ZONING: Future Urban Service (FUS) LAND USE: Low Density Residential (LD) DEADLINE DATE: 60-Days —January 14, 2019 1. BACKGROUND: At its December 19, 2019, meeting the Planning Commission considered and held a public hearing on the request. Staff recommended approval of the request, subject to revisions outlined in the resolution. The applicant stated they will revise the plans to meet the conditions in the resolution, however, they wanted to discuss staff s recommendation to include a neighborhood gather space central to the development. They did not want to include a gathering space in that location. There was no one that spoke during the public hearing besides the applicant. The Planning Commission generally liked the layout of the development. One Commissioner stated they thought the lots were too small for two-story single family homes. The Planning Commission discussed the neighborhood gathering space and generally agreed that it would be a good amenity to the development. The Planning Commission, with a vote of 5-1, made a recommendation to approve the PUD and preliminary plat, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution, and a revision that a neighborhood gathering space be located in the area south of the lift station (central to the development), with at least one lot being removed for its placement. Rice Lake Reserve PUD and Preliminary Plat Page 2 2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a residential development. The property totals 51.5 acres and is comprised of four parcels. The preliminary plat includes 93 single family residential lots and 3 outlots to be known as "Rice Lake Reserve". The PUD General Plan will be for all 51.5 acres of the property and is proposed to be rezoned from Future Urban Service (FUS) to Planned Unit Development (PUD). The property includes wetlands and floodplain for a total buildable acreage of 29.5 acres. The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility on the following: • Flexibility to allow a minimum lot size of 7,089 square feet, where 10,400 square feet is required. • Flexibility to allow a minimum lot width of 55 feet, were 80 feet is required by ordinance. • Flexibility to allow a minimum front setback of 20 feet for corner lots for the side of the home, where 30 feet is required. • Flexibility to allow a minimum side yard setback of 7.5 feet, where 10 feet is required. • Flexibility to allow a maximum impervious coverage of a lot to be 55%, where 50% is required. • Flexibility from the shoreland overlay district regulations. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer is: • Designing a more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of the standard R-3 zoning district. • Preserving and enhancing natural features with the trail system that meanders through the development. • Creating a stormwater reuse irrigation project within the development. • Incorporating architectural design guidelines for the homes in the development. • Providing a gathering space for the development. 3. BACKGROUND: The properties are generally located north of Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8) and east of Goodview Avenue. The plan shows 93 proposed residential lots, stormwater ponding areas, sidewalk and trail connections, and road connections. The applicant is proposing the project to be built in three phases. The developer has indicated that an HOA will be established for the development to maintain community areas, landscaping, and the water re -use system. Rice Lake Reserve PUD and Preliminary Plat Page 3 3. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding land Use and Zoning The property to the north is zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and occupied by the Diamond Point East residential development. The properties to the east and south are zoned Future Urban Service (FUS) and occupied by large residential lots. The properties to the west, across Goodview Avenue, are zoned Planned Unit Development (PUD) and Single Family Detached Residential (R-3) and are occupied by the Diamond Point West residential development, large residential lots, and a few vacant parcels. B. Natural Characteristics of Site The properties are currently vacant and does contain some challenges regarding an existing floodplain and wetlands. The properties are rolling with various elevations with approximately 21 acres of wetlands. 4. ANALYSIS: A. Level of Discretion in Decision Making The City has discretion in approving or denying rezoning applications, based on whether or not the proposal meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable standards are met, the rezoning application must be approved. However, if the City finds that any of the applicable standards are not met, the application may be denied. The City has relatively high level of discretion in approving a PUD. A PUD must be consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Rezoning/Planned Unit Development The use of the PUD zoning allows the developer zoning ordinance flexibility to create a master planned development. The PUD zoning is tied to a specific PUD general plan that is proposed with this application. Fenway Land Company, is requesting an approval of a PUD for the Rice Lake Reserve development. PUD's offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of zoning Rice Lake Reserve PUD and Preliminary Plat Page 4 district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater variety of uses, internal transfers of density, construction phasing and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the city has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of other, more standard zoning districts. In order to approve a PUD, the City must find that the applicant has demonstrated compliance with the following criteria: 1. Provide for the establishment of PUD zoning districts in appropriate setting and situations, to create and maintain a development pattern that complies with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. Allow for the mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land uses could not otherwise be accomplished. 3. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. 4. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability and general welfare of the City. Preserve and enhance natural features and open spaces including but not limited to the width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas, development of buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint facilities and utilities. 6. Maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities. 7. Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. In exchange for the proposed PUD, the applicant is proposing a more sensitive development proposal than would have been the case with the use of the standard R-3 zoning district, preservation of natural features with the trail system that meanders through the development, installation of a stormwater reuse irrigation project within the development, and incorporating architectural design guidelines for the homes in the development. Many of the homes are also positioned for scenic overlooks over the stormwater ponds and wetlands. Staff has made a few recommendations within the staff report that shall be incorporated into the development, for PUD flexibility. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan shows the land use being Low Density Residential (LD). The rezoning/PUD is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in terms of land use and density. Staff believes that the general layout of the proposed Rice Lake Reserve PUD general plan will exceed Rice Lake Reserve PUD and Preliminary Plat Page 5 the City's standards for residential developments, if the recommendations are incorporated into the development. The stormwater ponds also offer an ability to use stormwater for irrigation of the development, which is promoting the City's "Reduce, Reuse, Replenish" initiative. This will be further discussed later in the report. It is in staff s opinion that the Rice Lake Reserve PUD general plan, with the staff recommendations incorporated, will offer a creative and efficient method to planning the site, all which meets the intent of the PUD ordinance. The applicant has included a "ghost plat" or an example of how the other properties adjacent to the development could planned/developed in the future. The lots and the layout of the lots are not approved with this development. Staff has not evaluated this area for consistency with the comprehensive plan or City Code. Lot Sizes/Setbacks The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 51.5-acres to create 93 residential home sites. The applicant is proposing a combination of product types and lot sizes listed below: R-3 Zoning District 55' Wide Lots Lot Size (min) 10,400 SF 7,089 SF 1 Lot Size (av) 8,464 SF Lot Width (min) 80 Ft 55 Ft Lot Depth (min) 100 Ft 125 Ft * Requested PUD flexibility highlighted in grey The applicant is requesting flexibility in setbacks for the development. The applicant is proposing the following setbacks: R-3 55' Wide Zoning Lots District Front Setback 30 Ft 30 Ft (min) 25 Ft - side of home on a corner lot and lots 18,19, and 2, Block 4 20 Ft — for existing home on Lot 1, Block 1 Side Setback 10 Ft 7.5 Ft min Rear Setback 30 Ft 30 Ft min Lot Impervious 50% 55% max * Requested PUD flexibility highlighted in grey Rice Lake Reserve PUD and Preliminary Plat Page 6 The applicant shall revise the lot depth for Lot 1, Block 1, to be in compliance with the rear yard setback of 30 feet. Density The maximum development density for a PUD in the R-3 zoning district is 4 units per 1 acre. The applicant is proposing a residential net density of 3.1 units per 1 acre, which fits the requirements of a PUD. Although the applicant is requesting flexibility on lot sizes and setbacks, the density meets the ordinance standards. Shoreland The applicant, Staff, and the DNR have been discussing the boundary of the Ordinary High Water (OHW) of Rice Lake which is 922.5. The Shoreland Overlay District has additional regulations in regards to lot size and impervious surface. Minnesota State Statute allows regulation and flexibility from the shoreland standards for PUD's. Staff will continue to work with the applicant and the DNR on the boundary location. If it is determined that the property is within the shoreland overlay district, the information that has been provided indicates that this development meets the shoreland PUD requirements. The applicant will be required to received approval from the MN DNR. Development Phasing The applicant is proposing to construct the development in three phases. The phasing plan the applicant provided shows the phasing generally starting from the north along Goodview Avenue and heading east. The first phase would be in 2020 and include the platting of 33 lots with access off of Goodview Avenue. As development continues eastward on the site in later phases of the development, a connection will be made to Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). The property is also proposed to be graded in two phases. The applicant shall revised the phasing plan to include all improvements, such as stormwater ponds. Landscaping/ Signage The applicant has provided a full landscape plan. According to Section 90-181 Landscaping, each home site shall have two deciduous shade trees maintained in the front yard. The applicant is proposing to preserve some stands of trees that are currently on the property in the outlots. The landscape plan shows boulevard trees along the streets outside of the right-of-way. The applicant is also proposing to have one tree in the front yard of all lots. The trees and landscaping proposed to be installed with the development is approximately 208 trees. Staff recommends the applicant include additional coniferous (evergreen) trees along the south side of Lot 20, Block 4, to provide a buffer from Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). The plan also shows a landscaped entrance from Goodview Avenue North including a monument sign. Staff recommends additional landscaping at the entrance off of Goodview Avenue creating a defined main entrance into the development. There is enough space on the plan to include Rice Lake Reserve PUD and Preliminary Plat Page 7 additional landscaping. The applicant is proposing a monument sign, but the design of the sign is not proposed at this time. The monument sign location, design, and landscaping, shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to installation. The monument sign shall meet all ordinance standards. It's in staff s opinion that the applicant has done generally a good job with the landscape plan and the preservation of the trees. Staff recommends: • The applicant shall include additional coniferous (evergreen) trees along the south side of Lot 20, Block 4, to provide a buffer from Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). • The applicant shall include additional landscaping at the entrance off of Goodview Avenue creating a defined main entrance into the development. • The applicant shall include additional landscaping around a portion of the lift station. • The monument sign location, design, and landscaping, shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to installation. With the recommendations, Staff is comfortable with the landscaping proposed for the development. Lighting The applicant has provided a lighting plan. The applicant is proposing typical street lighting within the development that meets the ordinance standard. The exact locations and design of the street lights will be evaluated with each final plat application. Staff recommends the street lights be decorative. Streets/Access The applicant is proposing access into the development via Goodview Avenue North and Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). The first phase includes access to Goodview Avenue North across from Geneva Avenue North. The last phase includes the access to Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). The applicant shall provide Washington County approved construction plans and permit for the construction of turn lanes as identified in their November 7, 2019 review letter prior to construction of phase 1. There are existing roadway easements through the property as well as prescriptive easements for the Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8) access point. The portion of the easement will be required to be vacated as project proceeds. Sidewalks, Trails, and Park Dedication The applicant is showing sidewalks along one side of some streets within the development with a trail along the others. In the 2040 Comprehensive Plan the Existing and Proposed Trails Map shows a trail in the area of the development connecting Goodview Avenue North to Hanifl Fields Athletic Park. The plan shows a trail systems that could connect to a proposed trail along Rice Lake Reserve PUD and Preliminary Plat Page 8 Goodview Avenue and Hanifl Fields Athletic Park per the plan. In order for the trail to be extended to Hanifl Fields Athletic Park the applicant shall revised the plans to show and install a trail along Street A. The trail system will provide a recreational experience that takes advantage of the view sheds of the natural areas and access to future trails and parks. The applicant has done a good job meeting the comprehensive plan in regards to trails. In previous discussions with the applicant staff recommended a neighborhood gathering space with some amenities be integrated into the development. The goal is to provide open space for the residents to use, gather, and meet. This directly correlates with the request to have PUD flexibility for reduced lot sizes and setbacks. Reduced lots sizes and setbacks results in less green space/open space for each lot the development. In a previous draft of the preliminary plat and PUD general plan the applicant showed a neighborhood gathering space, where Lots 1-3, Block 3, are shown in the preliminary plat. These lots were added after the Parks Commission meeting. The previous plan (90 units) was considered by the Parks Commission in November. At its Wednesday, November 20, 2019, meeting the Parks Commission considered the park dedication request from the applicant. The applicant requested to get park dedication credit for the .5 acre park/gather space area and to satisfy the remainder of the park dedication requirement with fees. Park land dedication of 3 acres would be required with for the 29.56 acre of upland within the development. Therefore, the proposed dedication of .5 acres would satisfy 16% of the requirement and the remaining 84% would be satisfied through fees. Currently, the park dedication fee is $2,400 per unit and would therefore be $2,016 per unit or $181,440 in total. Without a land dedication, the total park dedication fee would be $216,000. Staff noted at the meeting that the Parks, Trails, and Open Space plan outlines standards for developing city parks. Neighborhood parks shall be 5- 20 acres in size and would typically include a playground, athletic field, natural area, and picnic shelter. The development is in Neighborhood Park Service Area 9 (NP-9) which includes Diamond Point Park. An additional park is not needed in NP-9 as it currently has a total population of 1,222 and the development will not lead to exceeding the standard of 1 park per 5,000 people. Additionally, the development is within 1/2 mile service area of Hanifl Fields Athletic Park. Staff recommended that the Parks Commission support construction of the trail through the development. The applicant at that time was proposing that the .5 acre neighborhood gathering space be considered for park dedication. Staff recommended that this not be dedicated as a public park and that the park dedication be satisfied by payment of the full fee, which is currently $2,400 per unit ($216,000 for 90 units). The Parks Commission liked the trail through the development and recommended sidewalks to be added to streets. The applicant has added sidewalks to the plans. Although the Parks Commission liked the neighborhood gathering space included in the plan, they recommended not accepting land for the park dedication and accepting the full park land dedication fee of $216,000 ($2,400/unit). Rice Lake Reserve PUD and Preliminary Plat Page 9 After the Parks Commission meeting the applicant added 3 lots to the plans in the area where the neighborhood gathering space was proposed. Staff recommends that a neighborhood gather space with some amenities (such as landscaping, gazebo, benches, etc.) be included in the central area of the development. The applicant has stated in their narrative that they are proposing a gathering space at the entrance off of Goodview Avenue North. The applicant is referring to Outlot B. Outlot B is small (.22 acres) and will include a monument sign and minimal landscaping. There are not amenities shown in the Outlot for a neighborhood gathering space. It is in staff s opinion that this is not a good location a neighborhood gathering space and recommends that the applicant revise the preliminary plat and PUD general plan to include a neighborhood gathering space in the general location of Lots 1-3, Block 3 (south of the lift station), as shown in the plan previously proposed. Staff recommends that be a requirement for PUD flexibility for the reduced lots sizes and setbacks. Adding the neighborhood gathering space in the area would likely reduce the amount of wetland impact and reroute the trail slightly to the south. Staff recommends the applicant revise the plans to show a neighborhood gather space central to the development and install a trail along Street A with the development. The Parks Commission stated at the right time, a trail along the north side of Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8) to the east of Street A, would evaluated for construction feasibility to make the connection to Hanifl Fields Athletic Park. Drainage/Grading The City will review and issue a stormwater management permit for the development. The plans include managing stormwater through a combination of ponds and a stormwater reuse system. The design is consistent with stormwater rules as proposed, and staff will work with the applicant to finalize the plans and issue a stormwater permit as the project moves forward. There is floodplain located on the property and the boundary is not proposed to be impacted or revised. Water Re -use The plans include the installation of a stormwater reuse system to be utilized to irrigate individual lots. The system is feasible from a water availability and equipment standpoint and staff will finalize the technical details as the project moves forward. The system will be installed by the applicant and owned/operated/maintained by the homeowner's association. The system will be part of the overall stormwater management improvements to be included as part of the stormwater permit. A stormwater reuse agreement between the City and the applicant shall be recorded. The agreement will include provisions that will allow the City to operate the system in the event that it is necessary to maintain compliance with the stormwater permit. The provisions will include an ability to assess any City costs associated with operation and maintenance of the system. Staff is working with the applicant to determine whether or not the water reuse system will generate stormwater management credits beyond those required to meet their own permitting Rice Lake Reserve PUD and Preliminary Plat Page 10 requirements. If that is the case, the City will include in its use agreement with the developer that excess credits generated are the property of the City. Wetlands The property includes some wetlands, which have been delineated and approved by the City as LGU. The applicant is proposing to impact .54 acres of the 21 acres of wetland for street and pond construction. The applicant has submitted a wetland replacement plan to the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) for approval of the wetland impacts. The wetland replacement plan will need to be approved prior to final plat approval of any phase. The applicant needs to address several items from WCA Replacement Plan Checklist. Primarily the Technical Evaluation Panel will likely be concerned with the wetland impact from Lot 1, Block 3 and adjacent trail. Homeowners Association A homeowners association (HOA) is proposed for the development. There are two housing styles (single family detached homes and Villa homes) that are proposed within the development. All of the homes would be part of a Master HOA established for the development to own/operate/maintain community areas, landscaping, and the water re -use system. The HOA would also establish an Architectural Review Committee (ARC) to review and approve the home designs per architectural design guidelines. The HOA documents and the architectural design guidelines shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the recording of the final plat for the first phase. Each property owners will be responsible for maintaining their own yards and property. Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat consists of 93 residential lots and 3 outlots. The proposed use and ownership of each outlot are as follows: Outlot Acres Ownership Use A 10.52 City of Hugo Wetlands B .22 Development Homeowners Association (HOA) Landscaping and Monument Sign C 16.77 City of Hugo Stormwater Management and Wetlands Utilities Water service is proposed to be extended from the Goodview Avenue/Geneva Avenue Intersection. Staff has recommended connecting to the existing 12" watermain and extend 12" watermain through the development to Egg Lake Road that meets the goal of the comprehensive water system plan. Rice Lake Reserve PUD and Preliminary Plat Page 11 Sanitary sewer will be extended from the 4" forcemain provided to this location in 2004 as part of the Goodview Avenue Improvement Project as the site was deemed to require a sanitary sewer lift station to service this area. The lift station will be sized and placed at an elevation that will allow for the extension of gravity sanitary sewer to serve the adjacent area up to and including the Hugo Public Works facility. If lift station upsizing is required, the City of Hugo would be responsible for oversizing costs. 5. CONCLUSION: Staff recommends the following revisions and additions to the plans: • The applicant shall revise the lot depth for Lot 1, Block 1, to be in compliance with the rear yard setback of 30 feet. • The applicant shall include additional coniferous (evergreen) trees along the south side of Lot 20, Block 4, to provide a buffer from Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). • The applicant shall include additional landscaping at the entrance off of Goodview Avenue creating a defined main entrance into the development. • The applicant shall include additional landscaping around a portion of the lift station. • The monument sign location, design, and landscaping, shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to installation. • A trails shall be added to the plans for Street A. The trail shall be installed and paid for by the developer. • The applicant revise the plans to show a neighborhood gather space central to the development, including amenities. Staff believes that the layout of the proposed Rice Lake Reserve PUD general plan exceeds the City's standards for residential developments, if the staff recommendations are implemented. Fenway Land Company has offered a more creative and efficient approach to the existing constraints of the property through the site design layout. It is in staff s opinion that the applicant meets all the requirements necessary to approve the PUD and preliminary plat, subject to the conditions in the resolutions. 6. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the PUD and preliminary plat for Fenway Land Company for the development to be known as "Rice Lake Reserve", subject to the conditions listed in the resolutions. 7. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission generally liked the layout of the development. One Commissioner stated they thought the lots were too small for two-story single family homes. The Planning Commission discussed the neighborhood gathering space and generally agreed that it would be a good amenity to the development. Rice Lake Reserve PUD and Preliminary Plat Page 12 The Planning Commission, with a vote of 5-1, made a recommendation to approve the PUD and preliminary plat, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution, and a revision that a neighborhood gathering space be located in the area south of the lift station (central to the development), with at least one lot being removed for its placement. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location map 2. Ordinance approving the rezoning to PUD 3. Resolution approving the PUD General Plan 4. Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat 5. Engineer's Memo dated December 12, 2019 6. Washington County letter dated November 7, 2019 7. Applicant's Narrative dated December 12, 2019 8. Proposed Home Elevations 9. Preliminary Plat plans dated October 22, 2019 (received December 4, 2019) A. Phasing Plan 0 0 (7 CITYY (DF^ EST. 1808 r �- r a I ;µ� � � of �^ } Roads Rice Lake Reserve Location Map Hugo, MN ;s " Hugo Border Parcel Boundary N 0 700 Feet 1 in = 700 feet ORDINANCE 2020- AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO AMENDING CHAPTER 90 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED EAST OF GOODVIE AVENUE NORTH AND NORTH OF EGG LAKE ROAD (CSAH8) THE CITY OF HUGO ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Chapter 90 of the City Code of the City of Hugo, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Hugo Zoning Map to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with respect to the 51.5-acre property legally described as follows: See Attached Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6th day of January, 2020 Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Ordinance 2020- Page 2 PARCEL f 17ES4A/PMW (Per Schedule A of T re Cu itment Na. MN52607, with a awnmftmeat date of April 24th, 2019 of er00 A.M. prepared by Pa-lners Title Company as issuing agents Stewart Title Guaranty Cemp-, ) That part of the North HWf of the Hwthwest lhrorter of 5ecti- 28, Township 31 North, Range 2l West, Washington County Minnesoto described os Wham Commencing of the Southeast comer of said North Half of the Northwesf Qua -ter; thence W terly, ofarq the South fine of sold North Hnlf of fhe Nrrthwesf quarter, J214.16 fee} thence Ala fherfy, p—h.f with the Eosf line of said North Half of fhe Northwest Quorfer, 8B4. 06 feet to the polnt of beglnrtln g; thence cantinaog Narfherfy, parallel Wth said Fast line, 436 heat, more or less, to the North line of said Section 28, thence Weaterfy, along said North ffne, 1439 feet, mare or less, to the West line of said Sealfon 28; thence Southerly, ofang said West fine. 438 feet, more or fess, to its lrit a r- with a Ane drawn WeateAy, parafle1 with the South fine of sold North Half of the Northwest Quarter, Ram the paint of beginning; thence 6aeteriy, along mid poralfrl fine, 1435 feet, mare or Jess, to the point of beginning, Washington County, Mmneaafa. (Abstract Property) PARCEL 2 OEMUPAXi .. (Per Schedule A of Ube Commitment No. MN53001, with a commitment date of ApnT 30th, 2079 at 8:00 A.M., prepared by Partners rtle Company as issuing agents Stewart Title Guaranty Company ) That pent of the North Half or the Na M-1 Q—ter of 5ection 78, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County Minnesota, described ae follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of sold North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence westerly afang the South Ane of oatd North half of the Northwest Qaarter, 7214,10 feet; thence narthvfy, parapet with the East fine of said North Half of the Northwest Ouorter, 446.40 feet to the point of beginning; thence continuing northerly, porotfef with said East line, 437.66 feet; thence westerly paralJN with the South line of said North Hoff of the Northwest Quarter, 1435 feet, mare or less, to the West line of said Section 20, thence southerly, of-g said West fine, 4J6 feet, more or less, to its fntersection with a tine drawn westerly, porallef with the South Ane of said North Naff of the Northwest Quarter (,— the point of beg+'n imq; thence easterly, clang sold paradel line, 1433 feel, mare or less, to the point of bNg .Ins, (Abstract Property} PARCEL 3 DE50WR7CAY. (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. MN52809, with o Commitment dote of April 24th, 2079 at 8r00 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Company as issuing agents Stewart rtW Qruronty Company ) That part of the Northwest quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Sectfon 28, Township J7 North, flange 21 West, Washington County. Minnesota, described as Wffc— Commencing of the southeast tamer of the North Half of the Northwest Ou-ter of said Section 28; thence westerly, along the South line of sofd North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 147C64 feet to the point of beginning; thence northerly, parallel with the East lino of —W North i oWF of the Northwest 0—ter, 446.40 feet; thence westerly, parallel with the South Ane of said North Hdf of the Northwest Warteq 1772 (eat, more yr less, to the West tine of sold Section 28; theme soulhedy, along said West line, 446 4 Feet, more or Jess, to the southwest comer of said North Half of the Northwest CWarte , thence eastery o0an9 the South frne of said North Half of the Northwest 0--lsr, t7G5 feet, more or less, to the paint of beginning. (Abstract Property) PARCEL 4 OESnWTAW. (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. MN53003, with o commitment dote of April 30th, 2019 at 8.00 A.M., prepared by Potners Title Company as issuing agents Stewart Title CUaranry Company ) That part of The North F004 of the Northwest fdrorter of Section 2$ fincluding Vacated rOGdwoy per V*Cument No- 5345451), Tow»9hip 3t North, Rangy 21 Weet, Woshfn9tm County, MUlne9o4o QeStribed a5 follows: Commencing of the soufheosl comer of said North Half of Me Northwest Quarter, fh-- westerly, along the South fine of said Math HOIf of the Norfhwest Q-6,, 427.60 feet to fhe point of beginning of fhe parcel to be desorlbed; thence northerly, parallel with the Fast Ifne of sold North Half of the Nwthwest quarter, 446.40 feet; thence westerly, jo-1W with the South fine of said North Nolf of the Northwest Quarter, f047.04 feet; thence—fherly, porcllal with the East line of said North Half of the Northwest quarter, 446.40 feet to the South line of sofd North Half of the Northwest Quarter; thence easterfy along said south Ifne, 1047.04 feet to the point of beginning. Washington County, Mfnnesoto. (Abstrnnt Propert),) RESOLUTION 2020- APPROVING PUD GENERAL PLAN FOR FENWAY LAND COMPANY FOR "RICE LAKE RESERVE" ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF GOODVIEW AVENUE NORTH AND NORTH OF EGG LAKE ROAD (CSAH 8) WHEREAS, Fenway Land Company, has requested approval of a PUD general plan to allow approximately 93 single family residential lots and 3 outlots on the 51.5 acre property legally described as follows: (See Attached) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the PUD general plan at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Fenway Land Company, subject to the following conditions: 1. A PUD general plan is approved to allow the creation of approximately 93 single family residential lots and 3 outlots. The development shall be constructed in accordance with the application and plans received by the City on October 23, 2019, November 15, 2019, and December 4, 2019, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the requested rezoning of the 51.5 acre property and preliminary plat. 3. The PUD general plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 4. The developer shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer's letter dated December 12, 2019 and all red -lined comments provided to the applicant. 5. PUD flexibility is granted to allow: a. Flexibility to allow a minimum lot size of 7,089 square feet, where 10,400 square feet is required. b. Flexibility to allow a minimum lot width of 55 feet, were 80 feet is required by ordinance. c. Flexibility to allow a minimum front setback of 20 feet for corner lots for the side of the home, where 30 feet is required. d. Flexibility to allow a minimum side yard setback of 7.5 feet, where 10 feet is required. e. Flexibility to allow a maximum impervious coverage of a lot to be 55%, where 50% is required. 6. Flexibility from the shoreland overlay district regulations. Resolution 2020- Page 2 7. The preliminary phasing plan is generally approved per plans dated October 22, 2019. The phasing plan shall be revised to include all improvements, such as stormwater management and trails. Any major revisions to the phasing plan shall require PUD amendment. Minor modifications shall be reviewed and approved by staff. a. Phase 1 shall include: i. Access to Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8) shall be reviewed and approved by Washington County. A permit for the connection shall be issued. ii. A neighborhood gathering space central to the overall development, including amenities. iii. Street C shall be constructed to the connection of Street B. b. Phase 2 shall include: N/A c. Phase 3 shall include: i. The connection to Egg lake Road (CSAH 8) shall be constructed. 8. The building setbacks and impervious surface coverage requirements for the PUD are as follows: R-3 55' Wide Zoning Lots District Front Setback 30 Ft 30 Ft (min) 25 Ft - side of home on a corner lot and lots 18,19, and 2, Block 4 20 Ft — for existing home on Lot 1, Block 1 Side Setback 10 Ft 7.5 Ft (min) Rear Setback 30 Ft 30 Ft (min) Lot Impervious 50% 55% I �m (max) 9. A stormwater re -use system, as shown in the plans, shall be constructed with the development. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by staff. The system will be installed by the applicant, and owned/operated/maintained by the homeowner's association. A stormwater reuse agreement shall be reviewed an approved by staff and recoded at Washington County. Resolution 2020- Page 3 10. The developer has indicated that an HOA will be established for the development to own/operate/maintain community areas, landscaping, and the water re -use system. The HOA documents shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the recording of the final plat for the Phase 1. 11. The developer must comply with the following, prior to Final Plat and Final PUD Plan application approval: Landscaping and Lighting a. The applicant shall include additional coniferous (evergreen) trees along the south side of Lot 20, Block 4, to provide a buffer from Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). b. The applicant shall include additional landscaping at the entrance off of Goodview Avenue creating a defined main entrance into the development. c. The applicant shall include additional landscaping around a portion of the lift station. d. The monument sign location, design, and landscaping, shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to installation. e. A final landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by Staff. a. The exact locations and design of the street lights will be evaluated with each final plat application. The street lights be decorative and shall comply with the City standards for street lighting within the public right-of-way. Signage a. Final design, location, and landscaping of the entrance monument signage for the development shall be reviewed and approved by staff. Streets/Access a. The developer shall address all comments in the Washington County comment letter dated November 7, 2019. i. Plans for street connections to CSAH 8 shall be reviewed and approved by the Washington County ii. All permits required from Washington County shall be issued. Resolution 2020- Page 4 Architecture a. The developer shall develop and implement architectural review and design guidelines for all residential buildings. Architectural design guidelines shall be reviewed approved by City staff. Open Space and Trails a. The preliminary plat and PUD general plan shall be revised to include a neighborhood gathering space in the general location of Lots 1-3, Block 3, are shown in the plan as previously proposed. i. The plans shall include landscaping and amenities. b. The plans shall be revised to include a trail along Street A south to Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). The trail shall be installed and paid for by the developer. Miscellaneous a. The applicant shall revise the lot depth for Lot 1, Block 1, to be in compliance with the rear yard setback of 30 feet. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6t' day of January, 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Resolution 2020- Page 5 PARCEL l OESCRhONOM (Per Schedule A of Titre Commitment No. rJN52807, with a commitment date of April 24th, 2019 of &00 A.M., prepared by Partners T41e Company as issuing agents Stewart title Guaranty Company ) That part of the North Half of the Nw-thwest 0-i-ter of $potion 28 Towaship 31 North, Rang¢ 21 Wesf, Washu+gton County Minneaoto described oa !allows: Commencing at the Saufheast tamer of ecid North HoJF of the Northwest thence W terly, along the Soafh Fine of sold North Hodf of the Nra-thwest 4uor{e,, 1214.16 feet, thence N—fherfy, purdief with 1hr East line of said North Paff of the Northwest Quorfer, 854.06 fee' to the point a! beglnning; thence continuing Nwtherfy, porallef wtth said East As, 436 feet, more or less, to the North Hne of sold Section 28. thence Westery, along said North line, 1439 feet, more or toss, to the West Rne of said Section 26; thence Southerly, afong .mid Weat fine. 4J8 feet, more or lean, to its lnterseation wlth a fine drawn Westerly, por.Ffel with the South Fine of sold North Half of the Northwest Quarter, from the paint of beginning; thence Easterly, along said poraffel Fine, 1435 Feet, mare a leas, to the pofnf of beginning, Washington Canty, Mfnnesafa. (Abstract Property) PARCEL 2 DESViTPfXW. (Per Schedue A of TrUe Commitment No. MN5J001, with o commitment date of Apnl 30th, 2019 at 8:00 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Company as issuing agents Stewart Title R—onty Company ) That port of the North Half of the Northwest Qrorter of Section 2$ Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing at the so Aheasi comer of sold North Half of the Northwest Quarter; thence westm'y along the South fine of said North Half of the Northwest Qaar[er, 12F4.10 feet; thence nartherfy, poro116 with the last One of said North Half of the Northwest Ouorter, 446.40 toot to the point of beginning; thence continuing northerly, poratfel with sold East fine, 437.66 feet; thence westerly parallN with the South line of said Morth Hoot of the Narthwest rluarter, 1435 feet, more or less, to the West Nne of said Section 28; thence southerfy, of-g said West floe, 4J8 feet, more or less, to its intersection with a Fine drawn westerfy, paraflcf with the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Q—ter from the pant of beg:nn+ng; thence easterly, &ang sold parallel +fie, r4J3 feet, more or less, to the paint of beginning, (Abstract Praperty� PARCEL J OC31MPf]61". (Per 5chedufe A of Trite Commitment No. MN52809, with o commitment date of April 24th, 2019 at fir 00 A.M.. prepared by Partners Title Company os issuing agents 5tewart Titre Qirnanty Company ) That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 25. Township 37 North. flange 21 West. Washington County Minnesota, J-,Ib,7d as follows: Commencing of the southeast tamer of the North Half of the Northwest 6Warter of said Section 28; thence westorfy, along the South line of sold North Half of the Northwest Gala -ter. 1474.54 feet to the point of beginning; thence northerly, paralfsl with the East Rna of said North Half of the Northwest Ouorter, 446.40 feet; thence westerly, parallel with the South Fine of said North Half of the Northwest 4uarter, t172 feet, mare ar Tess, to the West fine of said Section 2& thence sou ihedy. along said West ion e. 446 4 feet, more or Jess. to the sou M west comer of said North Hoff of the Northwest Wuurte . thence easterly War the South fine or said North Haff of the Northwest QiW ff. 1169 Feet more or less. to the part of begonning. (Abstract Property) PARCEL 4 LIESCP/PTiAv (Per So?-awo A of Uve Commitment No. MN6d003, with a commitment dote of April 30th, 2019 at 8.00 Au-, peeporoo by Partners Title Company os issuing agents stewort rtre Caoronry Company ) Thai port of the North Half of the Nothwesi Quarter of Section 26 {indlOrng voted roadway per Document No- 53455f), Towwnship 3l North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Mlnrlesoto described as foh,p", Commencing at the soulheaat comer of said North Half of fhe Northwest Quarter, thence westerly along the South line of surd North Hnlf of the Northwest Quarter, 42760 feet to the point of beginning of the parcel to be described; thence northerly, pardlef with the East line of sold North HafF of the Northwest quarter, 446,40 feet; thence westerfy, parallel with the South fine of said North Neff of the Northwest Quarter, 1047.04 Feet; thence swfh.0y, paroffel with the East line of said North Half of the Northwest quarter, 446A9 feet to the South if— of said North Batt of the Northwest Quarter; thence easterly, d-9 said south Ifne, 1047,04 Feet to the point of begfning. Washington County, Mfnnesoto. (Abstract Property) RESOLUTION 2020- APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR FENWAY LAND COMPANY FOR "RICE LAKE RESERVE" ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF GOODVIEW AVENUE NORTH AND NORTH OF EGG LAKE ROAD (CSAH 8) WHEREAS, Fenway Land Company, has requested approval of a preliminary plat to allow construction of approximately 93 single family lots and 3 outlots on the 51.5 acre property legally described as follows: (See Attached) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the preliminary plat at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Fenway Land Company, for a preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved to allow the creation of 93 single family home lots and 3 outlots, in accordance with the application and plans received by the City on October 23, 2019, November 15, 2019, and December 4, 2019, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of a rezoning to PUD for the 5 1. 1 acre site. 3. The developer must comply with Resolution 2020- , for the PUD. 4. The developer must comply with all conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memos dated December 12, 2019 and all red -lined comments provided to the applicant. 5. Park Dedication is proposed to be satisfied by fee. The park dedication fee shall be paid for each lot platted at the amount of $2,400.00. 6. A stormwater re -use system, as shown in the plans, shall be constructed with the development. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by staff. The system will be installed by the applicant, and owned/operated/maintained by the homeowner's association. A stormwater reuse agreement shall be reviewed an approved by staff and recoded at Washington County. 7. The developer has indicated that an HOA will be established for the development to own/operate/maintain community areas, landscaping, and the water re -use system. The HOA documents shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the recording of the final plat for the Phase 1. Resolution 2020- Page 2 8. The building setbacks and impervious surface requirements for the development are as follows: R-3 55' Wide Zoning Lots District Front Setback 30 Ft 30 Ft (min) 25 Ft - side of home on a corner lot and lots 18,19, and 2, Block 4 20 Ft — for existing home on Lot 1, Block 1 Side Setback 10 Ft 7.5 Ft min Rear Setback 30 Ft 30 Ft (min) Lot Impervious 50% 55% max 9. Outlot Use and Ownership: Outlot Acres Ownership Use A 10.52 City of Hugo Wetlands B .22 Development Landscaping and Homeowners Association Monument Sign (HOA) C 16.77 City of Hugo Stormwater Management and Wetlands 10. The landscaping planned for the development shall be installed all at the same time during each phase. The developers shall take proper precautions to protect the trees as the homes are being built. 11. The developer must comply with the following, prior to Final Plat and Final PUD Plan application approval: Landscaping and Lighting a. The applicant shall include additional coniferous (evergreen) trees along the south side of Lot 20, Block 4, to provide a buffer from Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). Resolution 2020- Page 3 b. The applicant shall include additional landscaping at the entrance off of Goodview Avenue creating a defined main entrance into the development. c. The applicant shall include additional landscaping around a portion of the lift station. d. The monument sign location, design, and landscaping, shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to installation. e. A final landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by Staff. f. The exact locations and design of the street lights will be evaluated with each final plat application. The street lights be decorative and shall comply with the City standards for street lighting within the public right-of-way. Signage a. Final design, location, and landscaping of the entrance monument signage for the development shall be reviewed and approved by staff. Streets/Access a. The developer shall address all comments in the Washington County comment letter dated November 7, 2019. i. Plans for street connections to CSAH 8 shall be reviewed and approved by the Washington County ii. All permits required from Washington County shall be issued. Architecture a. The developer shall develop and implement architectural review and design guidelines for all residential buildings. Architectural design guidelines shall be reviewed approved by City staff. Open Space and Trails a. The preliminary plat and PUD general plan shall be revised to include a neighborhood gathering space in the general location of Lots 1-3, Block 3, are shown in the plan as previously proposed. i. The plans shall include landscaping and amenities. b. The plans shall be revised to include a trail along Street A south to Egg Lake Road (CSAH 8). The trail shall be installed and paid for by the developer. Resolution 2020- Page 4 Miscellaneous a. The applicant shall revise the lot depth for Lot 1, Block 1, to be in compliance with the rear yard setback of 30 feet. b. The developer must obtain all necessary stormwater management and WCA permits from the City. c. The development shall comply with the Fire Chief s requirements regarding fire flow calculations, the location of fire hydrants, fire department connections, and fire lane signage. d. The Homeowners Association (HOA) documents for review and approval by staff. e. The developer shall obtain all necessary local, state, and federal permits. 12. Prior to the release of a final plat for recording, the developer must comply with the following conditions: f. The City's development fees will apply to this project. The fee amounts will be calculated and included as part of the Development Agreement. A development agreement shall be executed and all fees shall be paid. g. Park Dedication shall be paid for each lot platted in the amount of $2,400 per lot. 13. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer must comply with the following conditions. a. The applicant shall record the final plat, development agreement and all other documentation at Washington County and provide the City with proof of recording. Resolution 2020- Page 5 ADOPTED by the City Council this 6t1i day of January, 2020 Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Resolution 2020- Page 6 PARCEL 7 OE5CR/P714N (Per Schedufe A of W. Commitment No. MN52807, wrfh o rommitmerit date of April 24th, 2019 at 8;00 A-M., prepared by Partners Tlf1e Cvmpeny as issuing agents Stewart Title 0—rify Cornpony ) Th.( port of rho N'th Hof aF the Northwest Ct+ortw of 5ection 20,, Township 31 North. Range 2? Wesf. Wostrn-91 n County Minnesota described as r lfo— Cvmmvncing .t the Svuthovs( comer vF said North HWf of the Northwest Quarter; thence W terry, afong the South tine of said North Half of the Northwest (hrorter, 1214.10 feet, thence Northerly, pardfel wish the East line of said North Haff of the Northwest Quarter, 884.06 feet to the pornt of beginning; thence can NnuMq Northerly, parairW wtth said East Nne, 436 feet, mare or less, to the North ffne of -id Section 28. thence Westerly, along said North Rne, ?438 feet, more or Is-, to the West ffne of —a Seaffoh 28; thence Southerly, along soid West fine. 438 feet, more or less, fo its rnferseotioa wtth a Rae drawn Westery, p... Y.1 with the South line of sold North half of the Northwest Quarter, from the point of beginnfng; thence Easterly, afong acid p—HJ line. 1435 feet, mare er less, to the pofnf of beginning, Washngton Cavaty, Minnesota. (Abstrocf Property) PARM 2 OE5CWIIa.. (Per SchedWe A of NOV Commitrent No. MN53001, with a Commitment date of Apnif 30th, 2019 of 8.:00 A.M., prepared by Partners Trite Company as issuing agents Stewart Title GV.ranty Company ) That port of the North Half of the Northwest (Worter of 5ectfon Z6, Townshrp 37 North, Range 27 West, Washington County Minnesota, deswrbed oe forlowx Commencing at the s.uthe-t comer of mid North Hoff of the Northwest @tarter; thence westerly, aJC,g the South tine of s.rd North Hoff of the Northwest quarter, 124.70 feet; thence northerfy, poroffN wtth the Lost line of said North HdF of the Northwest Qtr—W,, 446.40 test to the point of beg—g; th— cantlri-g northerly, porafle7 wtth soid East fine, 437.66 feet; thence westerly porn➢ef with the South fine of sold North Hof of the Northwest W.rtn, 1435 fee; more or fes% to the West A- vT said Sectfon 23, thence southerly, .long -INd Wesf fine, 438 feet, more or fess, to its intersection Wth aline drawn westerfy, pwaffel wtth the South Nne of said North Half of the Northwest Rucrter from the point vi begin—ng; thence eo mNy, along said pwcllet line, 1433 feet, mare or 0e % to the point of beglnnmg, (A6stmct Property) PARCEL 3 0E5YWF?7WY. (Per Scheduie A of retie Cummitment No. MN52809, with o commitment date of April 24th. 2079 ut 6r 00 A.M., prepared by Partners Tr(le Company as issuing agents 5tewart Titre Gu—ify Company ) That part of the Northwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Sectfon 25L Township 37 North, Range 21 W-L Washington County. Minnesoto, descrfbed os follows: Commencing at the southeast comer of the North Neff of the Northwest Quorter of soid Section 2A, thence westerly, along the South fine of mid North Half of the Northwest l]uwter, 1474,64 feet to the pant of beginnlrtg: thence northerly, parallel wtth the Eost this vi said North Hulf of the Northwest 0—ter. 446.40 reef; thence westerly, pa'OV with the South ffne of -id North Hall of the Northwest Cuarter, 1772 feet. more ail less, to the lyest fine of -id Section 2& thence si,Ahedy. along soid West fine. 446.4 feet. more or 1es to the southwest comer of said North Half of the Northwest Quarts , thence easterly, afong the Svrrth ffne of said North Hdf of the Northwest Lkrorter, 1169 feeL more of teas. to the pant of beginning. (Abstract Property) PARCEL 4 DESA4,'PTirAV; (Per Sah*orW I A of 1784 Commitment No. MN53003, with o oomm:tment dote of Aprir 30th, 2019 of 8�00 Au-, prepwoo by Porteers Trtro Compooy as ''souiiq agents Stewart Titre Cuaronty Company ) That port of the North Half of the Northwest prorter of Section 26 (in Wading vaooted roadway par poeumerrt No. 534581), Township 3i North, Ra•:gff %' west, Vvash�ngtnn aunty, Minnesota desc"60 as fo+tows: Colmeaaing of the southeast comer of soid North Half of the Northwest quorter, thence westerly afong the South fine of said North Hoff of the Northwest 427.50 feet to the pant of beg.rnfng of the parcel to be desorlbed; thence northerly, parWle1 with the Easf flue of -A North Hof/ of the Northwest Quarter, 446.40 Poet; thence westerly, paradef with the South line of safd North Half of the Northwest Quarter, }047.04 feet; thence swthedy, p—R.1 with the Eost fine of sold North HWf of the Narthweaf Quarter, 446.40 feet to the South hhe of safd North halt of the Northwest Quarter; thence easterly, long said south ffne, 104TO4 Feet to the point of bnNniagWashington County, Minnesota. (Abstract Property) 7. 0 0 C7 Z w CO U) 0 00 00ID 0 0 N W F U) w w w 00 wsb December 12, 2019 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Preliminary Plat Review Rice Lake Reserve WSB Project No. 015057-000 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the revised preliminary plat submittal for the Rice Lake Reserve development located east of Goodview Avenue and north of County Road 8. In particular, we have reviewed the following plans related to this particular request: • Rice Lake Reserve Preliminary Plat, Utility, Grading, Erosion Control and Detail Plan Sheets dated 12/4/19 by Carlson McCain • Stormwater Management Plan dated 10/22/19 by Carlson McCain • Phasing Plan Sheet dated 12/4/19 by Carlson McCain • Shoreland Exhibit dated 10/22/19 by Carlson McCain • Stormwater Design Rational Worksheet and Drainage Map dated 12/4/19 by Carlson McCain • Geotechnical Report dated 7/8/19 by Haugo Geotechnical Services Based on the review of the revised preliminary plat documents, we offer the following comments related to this application: Preliminary Plat 1. The entirety of Outlots A and C are appropriately encompassed in Drainage and utility easements. 2. Front, side, and rear yard drainage and utility easements are shown. Easements where storm sewer and watermain extend between lots are identified with appropriate widths. Grading, Phasing, Street, and Utility Plans 3. Staff has worked through a number of comments with Carlson McCain on street and utility construction plans. Staff has a number of remaining redline comments. We do not expect that any remaining plan changes will have an impact on the preliminary plat. We will issue the construction plan approvals once the remaining comments have been resolved. 4. Project phasing has been reviewed and the project can be constructed in a manner that allows street and utility construction to occur without extending into or coming from future phases. Mass grading is expected to take place over the entire development with the exception of that portion of phase three that includes the cul-de-sac S:\Users\R_Juba\Rachel\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\Rice Lake Reserve\Pre Plat & PUD\Engineers Memo 12-12-19.docx Ms. Rachel Juba December 12, 2019 Page 2 5. Water service is proposed to be extended from the Goodview Avenue/Geneva Avenue Intersection. Staff has recommended connecting to the existing 12" watermain and extend 12" watermain through the development to Egg Lake Road that meets the goal of the comprehensive water system plan. 6. Sanitary sewer will be extended from the 4" forcemain provided to this location in 2004 as part of the Goodview Avenue Improvement Project as the site was deemed to require a sanitary sewer lift station to service this area. The lift station will be sized and placed at an elevation that will allow for the extension of gravity sanitary sewer to serve the adjacent area up to and including the Hugo Public Work facility. If lift station upsizing is required, the City of Hugo would be responsible for oversizing costs. 7. The initial phase of this development gains street access from Goodview Avenue. The access is appropriately aligned with Geneva Avenue and perpendicular to Goodview Avenue. 8. The trail needs to be added along Street A to allow for the extension to Rice Lake Park. 9. Access to Egg Lake Road is proposed to occur in Phase 3. The applicant shall provide Washington County approved construction plans and permit for the construction of turn lanes as identified in their November 7, 2019 review letter prior to construction of phase 1. 10. An existing easement extends along the east and north east portion of the development for "highway purposes". That portion of easement no longer needed will require vacation. Stormwater Management 11. The applicant has submitted a draft of their Stormwater Management Plan for the site. The applicant will be utilizing water reuse to irrigate the development and meet a majority of the stormwater management requirements for volume reduction, rate control, and water quality. Stormwater comments provided to the applicant have not been fully addressed. Applicant has stated that stormwater comments will be addressed in future submittals. 12. The stormwater reuse system will be owned and operated by the Homeowners Association, and the City will have access to the system as needed for monitoring and operation. The applicant is meeting approximately 80% of the volume reduction requirement by utilizing water reuse. The remaining volume control requirement could be met using dead pool storage provided in the NURP ponds. Wetland 13. The wetland delineation has been approved. 14. The applicant needs to address several items from WCA Replacement Plan Checklist. Primarily the Technical Evaluation Panel will likely be concerned with the wetland impact from lot 1, block 3 and adjacent trail. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. Additional comments may be necessary following the review of the responses to these. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463. Sincerely, WSB Mark Erichson, PE City Engineer Ms. Rachel Juba December 12, 2019 Page 3 cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) Washington County November 7. 2019 Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 RE: Rice Creek Reserve Dear Rachel: Public Works Department Donald J. Theisen, P.E. Director Wayne H. Sandberg, P.E. Deputy Director/County Engineer We have reviewed the.Preliminary Plat of Rice Creek Reserve dated 10/22/2019, in Section 28, City of Hugo. The project consists of 90 lot subdivision on 51.54 acres of land with access to County State Aid Highway (CSAH) 8 / Egg Lake Road N. and Goodview Avenue N. The project will involve grading, installation of public and private infrastructure, local road improvements, stormwater ponds and the construction of single family residential homes. Based on the plans submitted, we offer the following comments: • The future right-of-way width along CSAH 8/Egg Lake Road is 120 feet (60 feet from the centerline of the roadway). The preliminary plat identifies 50 feet from the centerline east of CSAH 8/Egg Lake Road, outside of the plat and 33 feet from the centerline south and west of CSAH 8/Egg Lake Road, outside of the plat. Please verify if the future 60 foot right- of-way impacts Blk 4, Lot 20 on the preliminary plat. • The access point on CSAH 8/Egg Lake Road is acceptable to the County. A Washington County access permit will be required from the City of Hugo for the new local street. • The Bypass Lane on Page 7 of 13, Preliminary Site and Utility Plan is not acceptable. A westbound right- turn lane and a center left- turn lane should be constructed. A plan section shall be reviewed and approved by the county traffic engineer. • The Washington County Comprehensive Plan 2040 does not identify a county or regional trail along this section of CSAH 8/Egg Lake Road. If the City of Hugo plans to connect the identified trail within the development to the park land to the east, within county right-of-way, it must be approved by the county engineer • Washington County's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise 11660 Myeron Road North, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-9573 Phone: 651-430-4300 • Fax: 651-430-4350 • TTY: 651-430-6246 www.co.washington.mn.us Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Rice Creek Reserve November 7, 2019 Page 2 Area Classification (NAC) where the establishment of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. Minnesota Statute 116.07, Subpart 2a exempts County Roads and County State Aid Highways from noise thresholds. County policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The developer should assess the noise situation and take any action outside of County right of way deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise. • A Right of Way Permit will be required for any work in the right- of -way as it relates to the development. A plan set is required with the application and include any grading, installation of culverts, installation of water and sewer services, left and right turn lanes on CSAH 6/Egg Lake Road, parallel trail grading, signage and any landscaping and other improvements within County right- of -way. All utility connections for the development require Washington County Right of Way Permits. Typically, these are the responsibility of the utility companies. If you have and additional questions regarding this proposal, please contact me at ann.oung- terwedoCa)co washington mn us. Please contact Carol Hanson at Carol. hanson@co washington mn us for the Washington County Right -of -Way Permit and Access Permit applications. Regards, ((II __')11L1 Ann Pung-Terwedo Senior Planner Cc: Carol Hanson, Office Specialst Rice Lake Reserve Hugo, MN December 12, 2019 Project Narrative Rice Lake Reserve consists of 4 different properties on 51.54 acres situated on the NE corner of Egg Lake Road N and Goodview Lane N. Bordered by some 20.92 acres of wetland, Rice Lake Reserve will create a connection with the natural surroundings along with connecting the community to its eastern Park. The community will provide a mix of one and two-story housing styles that market to multiple generations of buyers. The community is being developed by Fenway Land Company and homes will be built/sold by MI Homes. Request We are seeking approval for Preliminary Plat and PUD for the 51.54-acre site. The proposed 93 home community creates a gross density of 1.80 homes per acre. The net developable area of 29.56 acres creates a net density of 3.15 homes per acre which is still below the R-3 zoning district of 4 homes per acre. The typical lot width is 55' with an average area of 6350 square feet along with home sizes ranging from 1500 SF to 2600 SF. Side yard setbacks are 7.5' and 7.5'. Buyers today are less interested in a large yard and large homes that they must maintain. The PUD allows for flexibility in the standard zoning code. Providing housing within the City that creates a sense of community between multiple generations of homeowners, preserves the natural surroundings of the property, and is reasonable in price are the main reasons that a PUD makes the most sense for this property. The deviations we are requesting from the standard zoning code are for lot size, lot width, lot side setbacks, impervious lot area increased from 50% to 55%, front setback on 3 lots to 25' (L18, 19, 20 134) to avoid wetland encroachment, side setback on L14 B4 to 25', and side setback to 20' L20, B4 and front yard setback to 20' on L1, 131 for the existing homes that will be staying. In evaluating the criteria specified in the zoning code, Rice Lake Reserve is offering the following in exchange for flexibility: -Preserving natural features - Of the 20.92 acres of wetlands, only .54 acres are impacted. The majority of these impacts are in the middle of site where stormwater ponding will be located. The wetlands to the north and south are preserved with natural views for the residents. Trees along east side of Goodview will remain as a natural buffer. -Trail Connection — a 2875' trail will connect Goodview to Egg Lake Road by meandering around the pond and through the community. This connection will also allow residents in neighboring communities to gain safer access to Hanifl Park on the east side of town. -Storm Water Reuse — The development will utilize the ponding system for an irrigation system that covers common areas, park area, and residents' yards. This helps with meeting the site infiltration requirements along with conserving City water needed for homes and businesses. Rice Lake Reserve — Narrative for PUD/Preliminary Plat Fenway Land Company -Architectural Design — MI Homes has shown their design success within the City with their Villa Homes. This product will be provided in Rice Creek Reserve along with a new two-story product that is equally attractive. The plans have multiple elevations and color packages available for buyers. -Future Utilities — With the completion of Rice Creek Reserve, the City will have the ability to extend sewer and water service to the Public Works building which is currently on septic and well. -Stand Alone Community — Rice Lake Reserve is set out on a parcel of land with only Diamond Pointe South located to the west side of Goodview. This community has little to no impacts on adjacent landowners and provides connectivity for other existing developments. Housing Styles MI Homes will be the sole builder for the entire community. MI has successfully designed homes that meet the needs of buyers today. Their product offering for the community will be the single level living homes as built in Adelaide Landing along with a new 2 and 3 car garage two-story home style that attract families and young professionals to the community. The elevations of the homes are included in the packet of information. Homes will range from 1750 SF to 3500 SF, one and two-story homes, mostly basement lots with a handful of slab on grade lots, and estimated price starting from mid-300's. Material specifications include Hardi siding on the front, vinyl siding on 3 sides, and variety of stone/shakes/board and batten on the front elevations. There are multiple color packages available as well to enhance the street scape. Streets The overall street design minimizes the amount homes that are back to back, providing the residents with natural views from their homes. The streets are designed to City standards and widths for public roads. Open Space and Trail Area Rice Lake Reserve will have open spaces located near the Goodview entrance and overlook of wetlands at the intersection of Street A and Street B. With Hanifl Park to the east this community only requires some natural overlook areas for the residents. The trail system will lead in each direction to Goodview and Egg Lake. With the connection to Egg Lake, the City will now have the opportunity to complete a connection to the Hanifl Park. In addition to the trail, concrete sidewalks will be installed on one side of the streets connecting to the trail. Rice Lake Reserve will have an established Homeowners Association that maintains common area landscaping, the irrigation system, and have architectural control. All yard maintenance and snow removal will be performed or contracted by individual owners. Rice Lake Reserve — Narrative for PUD/Preliminary Plat Fenway Land Company Phasing Rice Lake Reserve will be constructed in 3 phases with the entrance located off Goodview Lane. Construction will plan to start in spring of 2020 on phase 1, phase 2 in 2021, and the last phase in 2022. Contacts Developer Fenway Land Company Mark Guenther 13925 Fenway Blvd N Hugo, MN 55038 651.425.0469 mark@fenwaylandco.com Engineer Carlson McCain, Inc. Brian Krystofiak 3890 Pheasant Ridge Dr. NE #100 Blaine, MN 55449 763.489.7905 bkrystofiak@carlsonmccain.com Rice Lake Reserve — Narrative for PLID/Preliminary Plat Fenway Land Company 7jr po ., 3 J �• y x �yv 1 ■ f m 'CZA 6"66i A.P �i Its X m I '-m Is I NJ Www- Nip -71 �� T EMMA L � _ �'w' �ti °�� /� y ti. `� -.� ___�. _ _ re t *.•pii ��LLyyyy�� f L i �7����iY� � � ', �� y �� � � = k- tU.=. 1 .. _ • �;`� . �� r� � ��:Q�� ''!'� • t . �' y �' '�. � '�� , � � � Y: . � 4 VICINITY MAP �I RICE LAKE RESERVE N �i HUGO, MINNESOTA ? RICE II I I LAKE II I PaEGG qO LAKE I OUTLOT A S. III I l S.N s \ l 1 III g SITE ENEyq 1 \ 2 3 4 5 6 w-4p 7 8 0 �_ — 9 10 `�- 11 — — — 11 12 I NOT TO SCALE ST3 14 15 16 RFErc 17 — — — — - �\ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 18 Z \ _ 11 12 13 19 __ 14 15 16 > � I��I �� 17 20 � Q 1 1 I I 1 OUTLOT C p 21 W lI II v, OUTLOT C I ol�l II /A---'� -� 22 I 1 15 14 2 23 —76 — 1-3- — — -- ll 17 14 5 9 10 11 12 13 N 18 `ST,QF 9 8 7 6 �' S�Rg 7 8 15 fr \ \ 19 FT 5 6 6 20 6 i 24 1 2 3 V 22 OUTLOT C �� 31 32 , \ � 23 --- \ _ (n 24 30 --11 Q 5D QD 2QQ 25 26 27 28 (IN FEET) d� © 137cT BENCHMARK o- DD \ i x - j-ts — i MNDOT c.oaena Mo�"merc 1— Po"I NrvDT Re:er, 20 GSID Station No. 9 a. El u. = 932.39 FT MNDOT Neotlgtic 8]M n=mev a Ea91e, GSID Station 50�E 932.39 FT. I of o 1I ! 0 - --- --- - SHEET INDEX �y� 1. COVER ` CALL BEFORE YOU DIG P`r$P1 ° 2. EXISTING CONDITIONS 11 �. 3. PRELIMINARY PLAT INDEX IGG �, P 'i' 4-6. PRELIMINARY PLAT 0 lG \ 7. PRELIMINARY SITE & 1 Q � 1 � UTILITY PLAN ° 4 8. PRELIMINARY GRADING INDEX 9-11. PRELIMINARY GRADING & ow. natrs below. CaII before Ou diEROSION CONTROL PLANS y 9' I FP 12-13. DETAILS T1-T5. TREE PRESERVATION PLANS The subsurface Dtility information shown on this plan is utility L1. LANDSCAPE PLANS Quality Level D. This quality level was determined according to the guidelinesof Cl/ASCE 38-D2, entitled "Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Ent.." Revisions: i (j Carlson 3890Blaine,MN Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 orhereby report was ethatred this or under Print Name: f Drawn K0.0 2/4/19 per City Comments FE N WAY LAND COMPANY RICE LAKE RESERVE 1 • environmental ine, MN 55449 or report was prepared by me or under my engineering Phone:'163, 489-7900 direct supervision and that I am a duly signature: a // Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North COVER Of surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota McCain www.Carlsonmccain.com the laws ofthe State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License#: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 13 ( -, PARCEL, OESCR/PAON. (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. M e",, wiM a commitment date of "n, 24th, 2019 at 8:00 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Company as issuing agents Stewart Title Guaranty A/ N I 1 1 1 �� % L) A N I /x E- 7 company) N - 6° 956ft`p `11_�u lJ I V L ly I lJ VV I V .� rjL_ L I Northwest corner 4 Section 28, Townshi OWNER: , Q - That part of the No. Half of Me Northwest Quarter of Section 26, Townshiv 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota described t lolE-t Commencing at H Southeast corner of said North Half of the P DIAMOND POINT MASTER 03,3 S89°4351E NorMwest Quarter, thmre Westerlyc 10.i , bAn line of said h -i Half of the NwNwesl Ouarfer, 1214.10 feet; tM1ence Northerly, parallel with the East line of said North Hal/ a/ Me Northwest Quarter, 884.06 feet 131, Range 21r (Co under water) RID 27-031-21-34-0033 1437 m Ma Paint o/ beginning; Menre ontinuing Northerly, parallel with said East line, 436 feet mo e w less, be the Nweh line of said Section 28, thence Westerly, along said Nwih line, 1438 Tat, more or less, to the er - - West line of said Section 28, thence Sout—A along said West line 438 feet more or less, to Its intersection with a line drown WesteNy. Parallel I. the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Ouorter. ham \ \ the point of beginning; thence Ee,teny, along said parallel line, 1435 feet more or less, to fbe point of beginning, Washington County, MinnesOto. e _ = aW aW are are are are are are are era aYu arc b ' E ^ I are a Abstract Pro ert ( Ewm ) ( P YJ k L North line of Section 28 1 /♦ T 1 1 �% /♦ Township 31, Range 21 PARCEL POESCR/PI)OM (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. MN53001, witF a commitment tlafe of April 30th. 2019 of 8: 00 A.M., prepared by Poriners Title Company s Iss g gents Stewart Title Guaranty I I s .., C_ v I I V\I v � ♦,, j � — I � WETLAND -- � Qampany ) I - a uln a 1 6 O I/ That pel oI the NortM1 Holf of the NorMwest Quarter of Section 28 Township 31 North Ron a 21 Wesf WasM1in ten Count Minnesota described as /allows: Commencing o1 the southeast corner of said North Hal/ o/ the NorMwest d,-1 r; thenre weateny along the South line of said North Hol/ of the Nwthwesf quarter, 12141n feet; thence northerly, parallel with the East \\ \ \/ _ Ilfethe Nwthwesth Dual A, 1435 feet,Y mo earl less 46.40 eeWest Ilne ofosatid Sectonnl28; finth ance con1-1y,9 along staid Westl knelt 4381/e t,smolre o I— toe its tntersecte terwith arollna drawnthe.—dy, Ip-diilSWidhN�tah Half WETLAND) I J I �\ -� 1 I _ I South line of said North Half of the NorMwest Quarter from the point of beginning; thence easteny, along said parallel line, 1433 feet, more ar less, to the point of beginning. (Ahstr°cl Property) I awe / `♦� are '�` /`A !r'P \ 4�+� \ _ \ 'r` 'r` \ 'r` 'r`_� 30ESCR/PIIGW (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. MN52809, with a commitment date of April 24th, 2019 at 5:00 A.M, prepared by Partners Title Company as issuing agents Stewart Title Guaranty \a ARGGlilf _ ^ ---' cam on P YI _ Thal part o{ the Norfnw-1 Quarter of the Northwest Warter of Section 2R, Tow—p 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, described -follows: Commencing at the southeast comer o/ the North tE Qa / __ }__________ _ _ - - -__'� PID: 28.031.21.22.0002 -_ --- -- - rip ry X I I / ` Hall of fM1e Northwest Quarter of said Section 28; Mence westeN, elan the Sou[It line of said Nor[It Half of me Northwest Quwter. 74I4.64 feet to me oint o/ De innin ; thence ...meN, ...1W with the Eext line Title Commitment N�' MN5F.U0 I - /-�- / j I b \� 01 said North el of the Northwest Ovorter, 116.40 feet; thence westely, pomllel with the South line of said North Helf of the Northwest Quarter, 1112 feet more or less I. the Wesf line of said Section 28; thence outilerly, along said West line. 446.4 feet, m e or less, to the southwest comer or said North Hali o/ the Northwest Quarter, thence easterly. along Me South line of said North Hal/ of the Northwest Quarter, 1169 V L� feet, more or less, to the point of be r c I ginn,ng ar (Abstract Property) 928-- I t \ PARCEL 4 DESCR/PI)OM (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. MN53003, witD a commitment tlafe of April 30tF. 2019 at 8: 00 A.M.. prepared by Partners Title Company as iswing agents Stewart Title Guaranty /_� \ \ ��� \ Company ) Coin Wood ref I t I < ink fence /— \ _� \ ale ale Je ♦r+ aL. \ �- ale Thal f o/ the North Half ,f the NorMwest Quarter o/ Section 28 rJudin toted roodwo Oocu— No. 534551 TnwnsFi 31 North, Ran 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota deaonbed oa foll°wx: 'Irg<�olheB we a / / \ ♦ I \ Par (in 9 va Y Per ), P 9a ✓ -- - n / o �` / \ \ \ ` \ ��_ �.+ Commencing at the southeast corner o/ said North Hal/ a/ the NorMwest Quarter, thenre westeny, along the South line o/ said North Hal/ o/ the NorMwest Puarter, 42].60 feet to Me point o/ beginning of the Farrel I - - _ — ' / / \ \ \ ✓ to be deswlbed; Mence northerly, parallel with the Eost Ilne of sold North Holf of the Northwest Quarter, 446.40 let; thence westerly, phmfiN wh the Soutb line of ,to With Holf of the NorMwest Quarter, 104— vk\ I feet; thence -Whiny, parallel with Me East line of said North Half of the Northwest Ovarter, 44s4C feet to the South line of said North Half of Me Northwest Quarter; thence easterly, along said south line, 104J.04 s « e 6 m ` /� feet to Me t of be Wa 0 t taunt Minnesota. 59 Q' r � _ � � -- \\ \ _ \ \ � \ \ POIn ginnln9� 9 Y. ae x / d.Y M J. I i -sw lage9 ae _\ - 5295.7 FE (Abstract Property) X'4.2 . mot. I sting j I I 13M, 2111. J \ �\ \\�`26� ) e field thi work for s survey was c on une Line parallel with the South line of� 1Th �1� \ \ y2B � ° m IPalad e,I- �9 JJJ J / -the North 1/2 of the NN�7/4 f \ \ g �38 \ ° 2 Bearin shown are based on Me North line of Section 28, Townshi 11, Ran 21, Washin ton Count Minnesota, / Section 28, Town hi 31, Ran ~ z \ \ ) ys p ge g Y. p \ _ s 9 to ` which is assumed to bear S89-43'51"E. L—fie�!,435_05 __!f —�/------�\\�- ^� 3) Easements for Public Highway per Ooc. N.'s. 489541 and 531059 a a be vacated o er the parcels being platted. 4) Above ground utilities have been {field located as shown. All underground locations shown Fereon a e APPROXIMATE. Prior fo any excavations w digging, contact Gopher Stale One Call /or an on -site location (65 QQ2. LEGEND \\ t ® - Denotes Set PK Nail -Denotes Guy Wire ------ -Denotes Watermain / 1 t♦ \ \ ` \ /'-\ y 1 \ \ — � \ \ - -'� \ \ \ ® - Denotes Washington County Monument, as noted 4, - Denotes Utility Pale FP - Denotes FEMA Floodplain l �� \ v _g26 �� / / A V sue - V A v • - Denotes Found Iron Monument o - Denotes Mail Box FM -Denotes Forcemain I \ O - Denotes 5/8 inch by 14 inch ❑ -Denotes Telephone Box rebar, marked with RLS 40361 p » -Denotes Storm Sewer O q a I- �h _ A t �.♦ j�/� -Denotes Light Pole O -Denotes Electric Transformer _ Denotes Existing Fence as noted ) 1 �� A s 9 ❑ - Denotes Electric Box d N o 3 WETLAND ♦ ,_.� - Denotes Miscellaneous Sign w N I ♦/ `F, / _ - - 8 -Denotes Gravel Surface n PID PARCEL 2 004 _\\ �" xDOD.D - Denotes Existing Spot Elevation ® - Denotes Television Box I q� Opo+ i _ ---- - : �i-031.2 -,2/2-"-------�---- ------------ \ I o - Denotes Electric Meter - Denotes Concrete Surface FP dd o—dd------ /1 1/ -0 \sr� \ \ �`E °� - Denotes Existing Tree 0 Title ern fitment No. MN53001 \ o - Denotes Gas Meter Denotes Flag Pole - Denotes Bituminous Surface T /l I / AI v 11.v-.I—.I- were 11 -Denotes Underground Telephone aue 1 lJ V V I V ^ F 1 lyuz `x ♦i 1, O -Denotes Water Manhole . . - Denotes Wetlands that w - Denotes Underground Electric ""- l; / \ ®°� ® - Denotes Catch Basin delineated by Kjolh aug I. I l FP /A 1 / �- ��♦ \ I♦� \ ( 1 - Denotes Underground Gas Environmental Services Inc. Al - Denotes Gate Valve u m 2019. r a Ime � ��' / _w �♦ � ♦♦ w,. �� � � -Denotes Underground Telev WETLAND r \♦ - o - Denotes Cleanout slan �a°o - Denotes Existing 2 Ft. Contour III I " //'/_ FPS / / \♦ 2 olio l ♦� '/`� wle \`are ♦ I I - Denotes Overhead Electric - Denotes Existing Well NwMern states Pow 142, campwy 111 ��•\ \ ♦ Q I / \ �\ / - Denotes Existing10 Ft. Contour I I Easement pet Book ge 203 '/' I \ I ♦ I A OWNER: I _a re. Me j \ 1, \ / / Easement for public highway Dr \ 7 I _ ((( OWNER: Do b t Noe. 489541 nd 531059 Y 3. M L RU H M SCHLET ' 5 \ V f I j \a -`x lUGENE & jHERESA ZERVA�S LIV %RS' ITo be Partlony wale) RID 28-031-21-21- 0 m fence - Ce tO �(1 / ♦ / 1 �� IV \ PID:28 31-21-27-00 ia�----,�--0 - -- --"--------------� - ---4= ----�1----------------� --- - -� III' — — — — — — — %-- j —\ — — — -- --,�7/ , enae T`----S89-46 7oE — �. ---- ��--- ---- �w tellI < _ fI I— 2.a Trre Ime �\ - fr. wit r - - T °f'`"e`y 7s 1934� 1047.04'�oh<s�f e `^Nx X - - - - - - - rw Ix I _ I ------�/------------ ._ems / --- t5x14.5- -L scapin4 / 7 0� IL e-T----- \�� \ \ 30 JO _ p / ♦A line p�a+(( net with the soQM nne� ♦ \ the Norf" 7/2 of the NW 1/4 of "'- an \�' / (- m.-m smmergxl ___ _ O III j\ lion 28�Township 31, Range etDming ' zaa �� _� / x �b — �� - >w - ____- ______ tt �__ _ -- - _ -___ 7 �wi:1^ �n glee —9az-�P�\ lro e . i "p' p°bllc 11 -1r Par Beek ,( pwilbny we° ea) a -P.ARCEL V N 'a o o� �'ARCEk'4 -- s I 31 owNER: PID: 28.031.21.2 .000\3 —_� -- --1 ' o w ° _ - _ z 3 PID: 28.031.21.21.0 03ryae ine------__--- \ I z Ll & o�aRLorTE A ZERWAS f- --`� 5� \In /�'L� /� ID:28-31-21-21-0002 �I Title Commitment No. MN530 3 a l z I I bl I " I �� ♦ Title Commitment No MN r N /.a z r z at� �� ,lie st ♦ aw aw an ,� ����� �\ \\ ��� =o _vzL� zz�♦� ���� �f �`5�„ 48,I WETLAND v�, �v� vn �Zr f_= I ��_�--���� �� ���♦�_ 111 %I � one aye' one one are are \ � �J i w o I / are / ,Iw. 1 ` /1 are are are1 t 1 F 1"/ `Y III R I \a°, ��♦ \\ \ e\✓ / �` i��►�._/ ��' \ ,t /_ '—i/� Vy/ I \ / z WETLAND ,JaeNNlJvina I I I 1 E sf fine Of the North 1/2 ♦� Tree Ina , / = / I �3 o jar the N 1/4 of Section-_, ` ' South line of the ` \ �_______--y---- y __�� 2B, Tow ship 31, Range 21 \--- orth 1/2 Southwest Corner of the North 1/2 \ \ e Ime of the NW i 4 of tion- I 1. Z --of the NW 1/4 of Section 28, \T �\ Tree nne 2$ Townshi/31 a 21 I I(^�. %Tlj I Y Township 31, Range 21 \ ---__ _ _ �\ - /^ 1 T v P I I I I: /���I��+ N� '! aue aae aae aae aae aae aae 1169.29 one dj an'' — — �L T - J� ' ame alu<I, �x\j, 1 ame elite �JM.- aJle 1 1 ^ 3427.60 216.33 — — \ 1474.64 II 6 1 Al �I / A /l r- -r I r N I l I � / �A- � ��°46'27"W OWNER: � .� V V I / `Y N V I 1 F 1 L_ I V V \ I / `Y NICOLE J,8-B NJAMIN J LINDEN A 1 r A I I A/ 4 / A �' \\ PIP�28-131 1-23-0008 / / / <C' V I L_ I / `t v\j I I �7 17 / 1 v VV ( / `T r % J- \. r Southeast ComeLof-_� ti I BENCHMARK D 40 80 160 d� �� /' / - iw Q�g0 ; -'� the Ngru1-�Df the I MNDOT G -k, Monument Named Paul MNDT Reset, I // ` 1' NW 1/4 Of Section 28, GSID Stat on No 94000 Elewllan - 9—FT / aj Vm �. % / \ Tqw-hip 31, Range 21 MNDOT GMonument Named Eagle. GSID j / P1 - r II I slat on No.. _ 9500T Elewl'on - 932.39 FT. ( SCALE IN FEET) � F .� v Sui a Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, 1. 12/04/ FEN WAY LAND COMPANY Carlson Suite , M I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name Thomas R. Balluff, L.S. DRAWN BY:BJ5 1. 12/04/19 -Per City Comments • environmental Blaine, MN 86449 or report was prepared by me or under my /�9 RICE LAKE RESERVE (, • •engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 di rectsupervisionand that Iamaduly Signature: W/8+•.aiQ / ISSUEDATE: 10/22/19 13925 Fenway Boulevard North EXISTING CONDITIONS Of •surveying Fax: (763)489-7989 Licensed Land Surveyor under Hugo, Minnesota 13 McCain he laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 40361 FILE NO 1888 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 www.ca rlsonmcca i n. tom se.a wee. lzla41l9 f�,obsleo9l eomlems aooav�awlraa a3alsa,weaa,elimmame9ss axaan.awa PARCEL I OESCR/PT/ON. (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. MN52807, with a commitment dale of April 24I1, 2111 at 8:10 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Company as issuing RICELAKERESERVE,gents Stewart rue Guaranty company ) OWNER: 'y8g� -st umnl DIAMOND POINT MASTER ASSOC 856,„ PID:21-031-21-34-0033 ?p f I n allorthwest ca ner of Section 28, Township 31. rRange 21 F- /� T 1 n A I L_ U I I L/ 1 V /� 7 T L 1 S89'43'S1E f I 1437.62 n I A / A I 1 1 1 I�� ', L) A A I /� F— .1 I '% / V V I V .� I I y I \ n I V \ 7 L_ 1 The( art Of the North Holt Of the Northwest 01e1ter of Section 28 Townshi 31 North Range 21 West Washin ton Count Minnesota described as follows: Commencingat the Southeast ,oat" at of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence Westerly, along the South line ofsaidNorth Half oftheNorthwest Ouarter, 1214.10 feet thence Northerly, arallel with the East linen of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 884.06 feet fa the point of beginning; thence continuing Northerly, parallel with said East line, 436 feet, more or less, to the North line of said Section 28, thence Westerly, along said North line, 1438 feet, m or less, to the West line of said Section 28, thence Southerly, along said West line. 438 feet, m or less, to its intersection with a line drawn Westerly, parallel with fM1e South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, from the point of beginning; fM1ence Easterly, along said parallel line, /435 feet, more ar less, to the point of beginning, Washington County, Minnesota. 1 /1 A I cC IO'oo "' I a I II P 0 UTLOT A " ' " (Abstract Properly) C� Cj Qa own are are are ,4 ,4 . ,4 are are era ,4 ,4 are a/e o ° n ___ar4' `-�- fIARCEL 1 - Nr ON (P Sch e Commitment No. MN52809, with a commitment date of April 24Ih, 2019 at 8.00 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Company as issuing PARCELiwart Title Title Guaranty Company) o _ =vs _________________'-� PID: 28.031.21.22.0002—_____— a9entsStewart [� r 40 % o ,___--- 3pF ----------------=- n o r�-----_ -- Title Commitment No. MN5280 I cn � That part of the Northwest North Half of the Northwest Quarter of Section n Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota, described as !allows; Commencing of the the North Half the Northwest Quarter Section 28; thence the South line North Half the Northwest puarter, 1414.64 feet to the C' I _ -' r �_ \ A outheast co ner o/ o/ of said westerly, along of said of point of beginning; thence northerly, parallel with the East line of Sato North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 446.40 feet; thence westerly, parallel with the South line of said North Hali of the Ohm - a "_ --- aV' aV' ate' aye �I\ /'-�� aV' -`aL' aV' aV' aV' aV' a�� a� a� a� a� > N 'an Northwest Quarter, 1172 feet, mo or less, to the West line of said Section 28, thence southerly, along said West line, 446.4 feet, more or less, f, the southwest comer of said North Half QOo \ of the Northwest Quarter; thencereasterl olon the South line of said North H011 of the Northwest Quarter, 1169 feet, more point o be Y� 9 or less, to the ginning. CiF J UTLOT (Abstract Properly) r1oW ` NN r�C A �N I --�- W PARCEL 4OESCR/PPON. (Per Schedule A of Title Commitment No. MN53003, with a commitment dote of April 30M. 2019 at 8:00 A.M., prepared by Partners Title Company as issuing " -_- a4 a4 a4 a4 a4 3w agents Stewart Title Guaranty Company ) That part of the North Half of the Northwest 0varter of Section 28 (including vacated roadway per Document No 534561), Township 3/ North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at the southeast co ner of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, thence westerly, along the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 00 2 3 4 5 6 \� mil\♦ ,8� ci d 42,a, It to the point of beginning of the parcel uNbe described; thence northerly, parallel with the EOst line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 446.40 feet; thence westerly, parallel with the South line of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter, 104]04 feet; thence southerly, parallel with the East line of said North Half of the Northwest quarter, 446.40 feel to 7 1 2 W the South If- of said North Half of the Northwest Quarter; thence easterly, along said south line, 1047.04 feet to the point of beginning. Washington County, Minnesota. 1t 'r` 'r` ��- W (Abstract Property) 'f� I SEE SHEET 48 9 e pa 10 Lin falls! of South line of the \- -�� GENERAL NOTES LEGEND -North Half of the NW 1/4 of Section 11/ 28, Township 31, Range 21 1\ `�♦ I � - 1) The field work far this s r y w completed on June 13th, 2019. Pt a as c ® - Denotes Set PK Nail I ♦`-'`-- 1435.05 l N I .) - _ 12 ` a� _ i 2) Bearings ossu n are based an the North line of Section 28, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota, 0 - Denotes Washington County Section which is mad to bear S89°43'51"E. Monument, as noted 1`l 1[� I n p 3) Easements for Public Highway per Doc. No's. 489541 and 531059 are be vacated over the porcels being platted. • - Denotes Found Iron Monument 15 O - Denotes 5/8 inch Is 14 inch 16 17 ------- c E� l 1 2 3' 4 5 6 7 ; _ -----I _- I I 8 C q ♦' L- 9 10 STREET C 18 2 11 ------ up c� �� "I ♦� , CEL 2 13 14'' 1512 19 ro I r r r _ _ ---- — PID: 28.031.21.22.0004 - ___= _ -- - _------ _-_Title Commitment No. MN53001 16 ry 20 � OUTLOT C r A l N 1 1 -1 i I are are are are are are, I u v r 1 I I, 1 I 1 :21 I �I / ' _,NSt orthern ates Powe Company Easement per Book 142, 203 _—_��\� /- 22 page Line parallel of South line of the 2 i I 15 14 -North Half of the NW 1/4 of Section 28, Township 31, Range 2 � 1432.46 - 1— 1171.92 13 -- -------------- 12 3 i- ------------=�— ,\ 17 11 24 SEE SHEET 5 10 5 18 9 e 19 PA EL -, 3so� - W z _� i ,"-'` --- ----' Title PID: 28.031.21.22.0003 - ____- -- ---- Commitment No. MN52809 -' Q _ _ "� = a `z y e Oc, r r r "" r,' r r EET B v 2 J wo g� r Q 20 21 22 ♦♦�- STR v v M �zt 1 •-�\ ma c� - = 32 " r r r r r r -fie 23 V 31 24 29 30 i �i OUTLOT C ♦♦ 3 25 26 27', 28 ---__�-- 4 33 140 Southwest Corner of the North -Half of the NW 1/4 of Section 28, Township 31, Range 21 ` ♦ ♦ `-„/ ♦�- v ' __ ____________ -/ A i' - 2216:33 66 I ---may I A/ 4 / •• V V I / A `Y V T r r- A I I A/ l 1 1 L- I V V V / A N89°46'27" W I / `Y NICOLE J &BENOWN�AMIN J LINDEN' PID: 28-031-21-23-0008 — LL) y rebar, marked with RLS 40361 Denotes Wetlands that were delineated PROPOSED by Kjolhoug Environmental Services DRAINAGE AND UTILITY Company in 2019 SITE DATA EASEMENTS ARE SHOWN THUS: TOTAL SITE AREA t51.54 AC. EXISTING ZONING FUS TOTAL ROW AREA t6.06 AC. PROPOSED ZONING PUD 5 TOTAL OUTLOT AREA t27.51 AC. UTILITIES AVAILABLE OUTLOT A ±10.52 AC. OUTLOT B ±0.22 AC. MINIMUM RESIDENTIAL SETBACK DATA: OUTLOT c ±16.77 Ac. FRONT 30 FT. TOTAL LOT AREA ±17.97 AC. SIDE (GARAGE) 7.5 FT. — - J L - _ - - _ L - _ SMALLEST LOT t7,089 S.F. SIDE (HOUSE) 7.5 FT. LARGEST LOT ±25,967 S.F. SIDE CORNER 25 FT. AVERAGE LOT t8,464 S.F. REAR SETBACK 30 FT. being 5 feet in width, and adjoining aide lot lines, TOTAL NUMBER OF LOTS 93 and 10 feet in width and adjoining right of way N lines and rear at lines unless atnerwise shown an GROSS DENSITY 1.80 LOTS/AC. this plot. NET DENSITY 3.15 LOTS/AC. BASED ON BUILDABLE AREA OF 29.56 AC. (FROM CITY OF HUGO WORKSHEET) OWNER: T I RUTH M SCHLETTY n �� I �1 OWNER: EUGENE & THERESA ZERVAS LIV TRS PID_28-031_21-21-0004_— \/—I— ---PID-28-031=21-21-0005--- S89°46'27"E �� E sa ement for public highway per - 766°rj0 Document Nos. 469541 and 531059 I 0 40 80 160 1047.04 11 STREET B I 1 IN FEET ) 30 I JSCALE 11highway 12 Easement for public 1 10 n per Document Nos. I� 489541 and 5311151 7 8 111 7 ,1 6 4 - I IV I 5 -- " 41r' SEE SH EET, qi, �`3 man wogPARCEL 4PID: 28.031.21.21.0003 _-_= =- osTitle Commitment No. MN53003a0UTLOT C IW�37T N3o I /I ri .,f - r--South line of the North HalfIof the NW 1/4ofSection 28,---,1214.10 I Township 31, Range 211'1 20 '1 j M M M M M 1047.04 M / _- 427.60 �'11 Px Southeast Corner of A I �� the North Half of the _,- 1 I A/ / A NW 1/4 of Section 28, 1 V V Township 31, Range 21 A N / -1 — � L_ w�J• I N 1(1 t � I rive 1 AKE ROAD I i \J • environmental (� Carlson 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 Blaine, MN 55449 I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name Thomas R. Balluff, L.S. or report was prepared by me or under my /�9 ,p���� DRAWN BY: KCM Revisions: 1. 12/04/19 - Per City Comments FENWAY LAND COMPANY RICE LAKE RESERVE 3 .engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and that Iamaduly Signature: W/0+•.•:��/ ISSUE DATE: 10/22/19 13925 Fenway Boulevard North PRELIMINARY PLAT INDEX of C In •surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 40361 FILE NO: 1888 Hugo, Minnesota 13 save wee. lzlaalle 1t,0051eoo1 eomlems aooav�ewlr�a esa\sarveaor.limm.meoss www.ca rlsonmcca i n. coin era ��aex.awa Hugo, Minnesota 55038 r- i T I n nl 7 a T Cast it n reference monument L_ v I v I-)YAv/ i \1 1 If� n n l n r L a N8g,56, with an off nail in cap o 20�E r Northwest corner of OWNER: °O �� , ,-Section 28, Township DIAMOND POINT MASTER ASSOC 31. Range 21 PID: 21-031-21-34-0033 S89.43'51"E _ -- 1437.62 �I 40.0 ,w_ ,Iw_ ,Iw_ ,lug ,Iw_ ilu_ ilu_ ilu_ ilu_ ilu_ ilu_ 1397.E 33 40 __North line of Section 28, /i I Om I Township 31, Range 21 I [� ¢ -36-+ �_ � -> ❑ H o � 1 ,w. ilc ilc ,il,. ,il,. il� ,v. >v. ,w. ila ila ila >u,. ,u,. ,u,. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,�. ,,. ,,. ,,. ,,. ,,. ,,. ,,. ,,. ,r,. C� 66 I nog II o N 3 ` ` OUTLOT A i458,289 q. ft. \ Drainage and Utility Easement (Over all of Outlot A) I _ i \ 33 40 OU7rr O� 232.6-----------------� '�\� > M lL _ 3.6 n 70 t 3 9,67 l7 -- sq. (f. 353.5 62.5 r----- 128.9----- 55.0 55.0 55.0 59.E _ 51.a ° m °p0 33 40 ±17,881 sq.ft. 2 ;I 3 °I 1 + of137,384 sq.ft.1 37424 sq.ft.l 16 °I 1 1f7,465 sgftt7.741sq.f5°37,872 efta % 8wf7.792 sq.d �\ m m m m Wu 1 I I I I I / f7,987 sq.ft.- J L-_- I 1 I 1 I I I / / 9 m/ 116.3 55.0 J L----1 L---J L I I I I / I / f7.694 sq.ft. M/�- 55.0 21.5 32.2 L __J L _ / / / / Line parallel f South line f 94 0 55.0 52.9 / / / 1O / t7, 359 s fL m/ / __the North 1/2 of the NW 1/4O R�22\ C "� o 52.9 J L _ / 9J �l / l / l / l� _55.0 o t / ' of Section 28, Township 31, 5.0 "' j 1435.05 4 ]4,5 /� / / 11sq.ft / / „f / / / / \ \ Range 21 204.9 14 J 6 / / /t7,359 °'�/ / � �-air•---�-__� - - - I'Ts - - - - to - - - - - - - _r7z� - - - =>.� / - /- - rn _ l l - - l 12 Ml l- - l l l f7,359 iq.ft. /- 4 R=720.0CIO �- ! ` 13 r ss 13.1 40.2 0 \ _ 55.0� L \ / / / /t 7,359 sq.ft / l 14 0 -1 r-54. 7- 65.4 -\ 5ED- l l l / /37�359 sq.ft/ / m/ / / / \° l 1 t I I ss.o ss.o �� / / \ r---_ I� I I >V. ill. 66. o \, L\ / / / / n/ / r 00o )- C4 1 -_ 9 / M \ 58.Q / 15 i / t7,359 sq.ft./ rv/ / I , 3z\7 -\_ / / / 16- U= IA/ n1 �` I I 1 �I h /10 28e \ SS. ��/ / /t7.765 sq.ft. 1 i I Y 1 s. \ \ s. D \ o sa I vv I v r ,o o ` s l 17 Q yJ I W t I I \ 45 f7so3 sq.ft:l I 2 3 ml I �1 I �I I v \ s. L ±9.016 eq.ft.1o/ v I t7,166 sq.ft. I 5 MI I _(��W / �� $ l / \ Uj Iz t7.z7a sq n. 4 nI M 6 w o a a o ST EE a / / W t7,oa9 sq.ft.1 137,z91 s .ft.1 1 % m T / / \ ,7 1 I I I 9 t7,415 sq.ft Imo'' l l� �55.0 L' \_ 1 1 t7,az6 soft: l I 8 / \ s2a// > I - I iE,120 sq ft.1 /' nn/ / 5.0� \18 -/ 38,768 s q.ft.9 --o J � / / \ I / t7.937Jsq/ t`/ // �.o10 M/ \ ,\n \li7.359 sqft/ �5'00.7 1056- 0/12 7,359 sqft0 57.2 12 �1'9s3s /37,359 q.fL/ t10.598 sq.ft. 56./ 13 n °_7,359 q.fL/ m/ 55.0- - w 14 M \ \a .9 <� I fa I II I 55.0� L / / / /37,359 sq.ft.-/ / il il il il il il il il 1 _ 15 Ml r0 (V D� L / t7,359 sq.ft / o/ / \ mo 0 33 55.0 �/ / 16 II ro l 20 L \ \ / / / / t7,265 sq.ft./ / 1 / J __ ___30 _-T-__30___ l ±10,007 sq.ft. ' ,w_ ,lu,_ ilc ilc ilc ilc ilc ilc I O UTLO T C t9,223 sq.ft. / / I 6 - - + - - - o 0.0 o- ge and U sq.ft. 55�J ` / / //9�1 U o 150.0 0 1 Drains d Utility Easement J 1 I 0 25 50 100 1 over ou of o U.t C - ss. - J / ,r, - - - - - - I ( ) 7 L - - - C �t Drainage il il s 64.9 9.8 E- 21 - ana uulity\ SCALE IN FEET) i 34.7 sq. ft. Easement \ i LEGEND / 35.D ----- F-- -- ,So.°_ ' 38.7 38.7 39.5 l r---- Cf) PK --1 r-- 3g2 1 �7 w1 2 L_ 1 .5 o° nl o i - 1 Denotes set $/( Nail ,a. vu, ,. n. ,u. A'y0 i7,427 sq,ft. 1 35.1 n 22 `vl i � � � c � 30 30 I i8,526 sq.ft. � ® - Denotes Washington County Section ��� i 8.4- n I � Monument, as noted �__-_- �•� � 1 1 ' L-_--_--_-__��\ ___,_____._ o' $ • - Denotes Found Iran Monument �7 aD`6// /^\\ sSo r------------ NIL__ l __ 149_5--__-J 33 40 I1 ,� 0y - Denol5/8 inch by44 inch il�- / // \\ \ / / \ I I __ ___-41 rebar, marked with RLS 40361 / \ \ Ian' / / \ 2 1 N r N 1 A / I / \ A / \ \ 15 1 10 14 0/ / Line III of South line off m 38,155 sq.ft. i I 1 V V y - Denotes Wetlands that were delineated `` I "� \ \`�s ±10,370 sq.ft. I I ±10,370 ic.ft. may/ / / ,r the North 1/2 of the NW I Cr I 23------- by Kjolh oug Environmental Services / \Q / / \ A-- -J 1 `O Company n 2019 i / \ \ / / / \s i 1/4 of Section 28. Township 140.4 A ml ts,069 sq.ft. pony , \ / / 1432.46 / \ �O / 31, Range 21 ,- _ , RL5 6617 / / e _ - - - - -1 1 , i- - - - -- ------gym. / -- \\--��- / / / -� - ---�- ----- _ N °I L_ 40.2 -_� v T71.9z ry / r -� 16 \ \ J �� / /t6.13s ft.: / / \ Sa m\ -- \� '--Drainage and__, �I I� 2 f10, 844 sq.ft. \ V �+,60 36.0 �/ / q / / / / \'9 \ 3 1 �1 -Utility Eas ent `�I ^T _ - -em 3890pheasant RidgeDrive NE, Revisions: FENWAY LAND COMPANY (� Carlson Suite 100 I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name Thomas R. Balluff, L.S. DRAWN BY: KCM 1. 12/04/19 -Per City Comments 4 • environmental Blaine, MN 55449 or report was prepared by me or under my /�9 ,p���� RICE LAKE RESERVE • •engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 dirertsuperndSuand that I veyorunder my Signature: W/e+• I ISSUE DATE: 10/22/19 13925 Fenway Boulevard North PRELIMINARY PLAT Of •surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 the lawsns of Minnesota Hugo, Minnesota 13 McCain the IawS of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 40361 FILE NO: 1888 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 www.carlsonmccain.com S.1le. rziavi9 r.�,00sleoor semisms oo 1--d �3d\surv•a lir,m•mems o.o. 0 a EU C� C� L Cn C� w E ] ro r- N oI2 33 I JL.I j Ij t7.5a7z.2s sq.e:'I 'II _5/gL -7 / I1oPr3"2.7 %�'�3\7,\/3/l\59 sq.ft,/ 1 /108 z\a1,Ml6 L7,765 � 2 4546 .o / 9.0�1916 7 (s/ Rq/./f\°t/.t♦ If7.503 qf.l l I1 Ij t s-4sq.m w"I Ii7.ol Itz�ftI I77.416sqft2s. 13 nl _se.0 �I h('n a - EE1\ L .f.�-55.0tI C If 1t8.120 __5.0 I�71168-sq.ft. 5,6 Lt7,9310 - so It /i7.3^5507-.01 9.7 i7,359 sq.ft/ 0/70./2 � 123.9 f71q.ft: -t/ ,\0,\1s5/2 9\9o/ -18/ 5\ /5 sq. 0 �f>-9t .It/56.1 13 / ±7359 sq.f/ 0\ / 14 5S.0±7,359 qft, If i1 ' s / l 15 /±7.359 sq.ft 16 0/ i 330.0 55'p� v L _ � / / /37.255 sq.ft./ / 17 / ' - 30' 7 �- 30 - � i I 20 N ra \\ / t10,007 sq.ft. 3 SS. �/ / / f9,223 sq.ft. / I OUTLOT C �, o-+----�- 3730,337 q.ft. I Drainage and Utility Easement _'_ _ (over all of Outlot C) 64'9 Jg.B ---� F mr I 21 v~�'D e uiicty\ 34.7 N w 38,625 cq.ft. Easement 135.0 \ 38.7 38.7 1 F------- - E-� L-- -- 150.0 - - - -- \ / 39.5 i/ 36. r` �--T--------- ° M 22 t7.av sq.tt. L ____135.1 8.41 30 30 k°' /� \ // / \ So r------------ 149.5 -J e \\ I to 2 I p4 d� ♦♦� ^m�' // \ \\� 15 I I 14 y / // ^ Line parallel of South line of - 38,155 Iq.ft. lim I ______ f10, 370 sq.ft. I I t10, 370 sq.ft � / / / / \49 __the North 1/2 of the NW -_ J pl rnl I 23 m 1 4 of Section 28, Townsni [40.4 11 / \ S / p t9,069 sq.ft. 143246 _ 31 Range 21 :ft \ 11sp �3ry// /-_ I L1402 ° Drama an16 \ \ J L/ /f8,157t 9ev/`O3±10,844 s .ft^p 60//��-�j��Y33LS 4D 60 12 / _ 4\ 1f25�967/6' sqon3°Ntyfos're"\°`/tii/ // /l °0r�'.S 94.7 5z-'� \ ESte/ / _ 17 = , / 11 / / / 47.2 47.5 \ m3 ±10,844 sq.ft. I"' i/ / /38,525 sq.ft.\ \ \ II\ \� i9,953 sq,ft. \a la- o `\, s. ot1 \ ' / / // l0 ' ' I I I 1 1 1 \ P w lam v v v ♦\ ' =j 8 /�\6 ° o t ss \ �// t9.o3s sq.f n 5 1�� ♦ �� \r / e7 6 I 1� t7,346 sq.ft. \ ♦ �' // 39,038 sq.ft. of I a \ Ira 6 18 7 m I T n I ti / /so:o fa,n1 raft. \ /" r7 I ♦ m \" 1 t10.385 sq.ft. / / / �3 \ 1p / I / t8.826 sq.ft. t8,798 soft. g I ; I ♦" \ // / 4, / % /,00 '38�\ J/ ' 19 \ / / t8,724 eq.ft °i / 1 1 ��J \ - x \ ham/ / 20 / / '4 L 1\ z I E m \ / / / / fe.892 sq.ft. / / /\ ss 6.s o / ka . `\ 21 / / > \ STREET B - 55A�1 \ \ \ \� v \ � 37,425 sq iN W / / / / 3B,589 s�ft / / / Sr.4-_312.0 2 1 \ f 7,425 sq.ft. \ / \! 5/.a ,32 - w \ 37.425 sq.ft. \ / / / / 22 / / / / 44z'`o\ 7'425 sq.ft.I-5_ 30\\31 \o 38.644 q.ft. 53�� t7.azs eaft \23 I \ \ \ \\ \ \ C� ' ?' I m m m m m m -�•- / / / / 38,521 I,%ft. c� 0UTLOT C -� 2`� / 9/ 24 9 Ll 3730,337 sq.ft. `� / / % /38,342 sq.ft. / ' I I VK I I \ 1 w\\ \ �> o fD \ \\ \ \\ \ O �• Drainage and Utility Easement �� / / / / ^ / I I A I 1� o fall of outsat sa / "/ /ta,s2sa5 ftol I � 29 �� s -'�- 4 I�f8, 336 q. ft. a 1 1I Ita.26 .al 27 ' ta.2�s a.l \� \ \ o o > ' -_' q- �'S5' `` 40 se,8� / / / I I _ fe,789 sq.ft. I l0 1 1 3 \ N� r ] �, I .il. .il. ,m .il. .il. .il. ,il. ,� ,il. ,� ,� ,il. >� >� /36.9 ss. / J c I I II II 1\ 1 _5 3p6? /._ n 36 A n l /� r- L -1 �� I I I \_�'68. S n �887 L-J L---_-', c 137.8 1169.29----_-__--- -__--- --�--J ' -- 66-------.1 = vF I A / 'I vV I / n / `t /1 r -r V i I N I I r- n I Al '1 / n f 1 L_ I V V v I / `t LEGEND 2216.33 N89'46'27"W OWNER: NICOLE J & BENJAMIN J LINDEN PID: 28-031-21-23-0008 1 oN ® - Denotes Washington County Section a0 Monument, asnoted zn 3 O - Denotes 5/8 inch by 14 inch o, I 0 25 50 100 rebor, marked with RLS 40361 a o°I jI - Denotes Wetlands that were delineated tl ( SCALE IN FEET) by Kjolhaug Environmental Services Company in 2019 (A Carlson •environmental • •engineering •surveying C In sage wee. Iz/aalis r.�,00slsool eomisms 000avewha�sals•w•aorermm•meoss 3890 pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite , MI Blaine, MN 55449 phone: (763)489-7900 Fax: (763)489-7959 www.ca rlsonmcca n. com o.o.a.a I hereby certify y that this plan, specification Print Name Thomas R. Balluff, L.S. orreport wasprepared hameorunder my /�9 ,p� direct supervision and thatiamaduly Signature: W/e+•.a�/ Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 40361 DRAWN BY:KCM ISSUE DATE: 10/22/19 FILE NO: 1888 Revisions: 1. 12/04/19 -Per City Comments FENWAY LAND COMPANY 13925 Fenway Boulevard North Hugo, Minnesota 55038 RICE LAKE RESERVE Hugo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY PLAT C 5 Of 13 38,768 I 19 v' I t10,598 sq.ft. \ ;q.ft:14 l % l e o J 55 °_ _y �� LEGEND / /47,359 sq.ft % / 15 M/ / / / �' \ \1-- _ -- Tl ifi\ ® - Denotes Set PK Nail �/ r, L 1 t /f7,359 sq.ft. / / / i'r _ n 1 \ w<; - Denotes Wetlands that were delineated 0 25 50 100 16 "'l l \II 1n V m� o by pang in Environmental r Services 37,255 eq.ft./ 17 /-----30- --30-- 20 m �o\\ Company n 2019 _ ±10,007 sq.ft. 3 / / -- - I SCALE IN FEET) 55.0� J ` 39,223 sq.ft. - _ 150.0 T r� -- 55.1' -/ L - - - - anaina9� 64.9 ,a " 9.8 EF l 21 'dmellr,ty\ 34.7 N I W � I f8,625 sq.ft Ea e t\ 135.0 \ N 50.0 i/] I of 1 16 . q. , a f74z7 sq.ft. 22 h _ 30 30 n i8.526 sq.ft. N _ _ _135.1 -8 4- ni r--------- - N�-- 149.5-----J n Im I -----�--/-�- OWNER: OWNER: 2 r NI 1A/ / RO TH M SCHLETTY EOCENE & THERESA ZERVAS LIV TRS rol I I IV VV o PID: 26-031-21-21-0004 I PID: 28-031-21-21-0005 Line parallel of South line of t8,155 sq.ft. I I the North l/2 of the NW I J 23_______________________________________� __-_-- ______-____ _�_______-__-_-______-___ 1/4 of Section 28, Township 140.4 -- �11 i9,069 sq.ft. Easement forpublic highway per 1 j 31, Range 21 L_-- _--� N 1 �i , M S89°4627"E --- Document Nos. 489541, 531059-- M i o°IJ- 140.2 - _� RLS 6617 786.50 RLS 6677 lin ---Drainage and 1 `169.6------p 346.1 _� 270.8 \ 3 1 _Utility Easement 4 7 A �w1p 1047.04 �- p385 m STREET B M tfi,zoasq.ft. 1 w�- - - ---- `--�I- r / r °1'o i R_75o.0 o - w - 134.7 - - - -� 24 \ \ n ,. i 1 / - J 64.2 50.0 56.4 134.0 79? u'�p 3 325.967 sq.ft. ; ° \ v - / �' \ 67.2 -, r----1 ---1 r---1 25� -----------, 30 30 i 0 \ - 9e of 5m\-�E10-rIlI, m- 3 II fl f f wy l 14 tsass sq.ft.47.z 47° o14 ----_ ---- 1" 13 ±9,953 eq.ft. 37,471 eq.ft. 37,491 q.t------- 'w�a Ii JI eq. 15 J 10 e. 03 t8,246 q,ft.l5 ao 9 t7,346 sq.ft \±8.237 sqfti7. 70 q.ft. t8,171 s.ft. t7,590 sq.ft. ±8,826 sq.ft. zs7 7 1- --�J E- 54.7 54.5\37,425 sq.ft. .--52.2 9.3.c_'Es \\ `o z�y \ / 54.6 5 \ \f7,425 sq.ft\ \ `� \ \� --, 546 n� I �L2 ¢i of I j _ 6 28 19/ / 550'� \ \ \ \ \\i \ \ 37.425 sq.ft\ \ i\� \ 11 i 1'/5A. '' .� I f7___37. \ \ \\ - 76.5 76.5 •10J'\\\ i7.425 sq.ft. \ I�`l-1'/55412 �o ' \ \ \ \\ \�' 3 \ \ \ VV \-55p �/ i r----------� 7Z, B - /- o a I i5°- \ \ / \ � 37,425 sq.ft.\ \ \� -i of 17 o E" 72.0 - ° - \ \ \ 2 \ \ \ \ -550 /\ /�i �`\ �14 i6,875 sgJt. 400.0 -___� 55,--1 \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ \37.425 sq.ft.\ \ -% +10. ��\` +Ilz. •`tom ZJ woN V \ \ \ \ 32 v, \t7,425 soft.\ \ \ \ , V-550 g0 -�- /�' 125.0 I 3�! a3----------J o¢ro 30 \ 31 \\ V7.425 sq. ft.i\p 51.4 51.4 \ cs 5 r--------� '�N µ t7,azs s a. \. '>.g .^ o -, I l t6,675 sqjo te \ \ I I 125.0 I I 28 \ I o38,336 sq.ft. `\ \ 9 m \\ \ \ 1-'S ° _ _ -.� o o ,ul wl. wl. wl° wl° ,w. ,w. ,w. .I 1 r - - - - - - - 8653 I 27 o t8.28sq.it.\ 11 I \ \\ ;N \ \ 55� , _� OUTLOT C /��li 19 0 3N3i °M I I d:8,789 sq.ft. I l0 1 \ N� % , .. 1 lei 1 1 \ m i t730,337 sq.ft. wl I t6,675 sq.ft. lea _ ro 1 550 8 S Drainage and Utility Easement ^ 250 w I o z _z (Der all f oatlat C)-------J ,�. - _ 0 1 I --6g51(-- - - - - - - m ss.i --J I --- 9.2 --� - ;a6 / N m II 20 \ 1/ t8,495 sq.ft. I2 137.8 6wl� wn wl.r---�.� F wl� wl� wl� >u< >u< 1214.10 30 30 I- / __ I -- _------- -�-_-----"'/ /' 1047.04---- Ir _ _ _106.9 ��9a I _ L 481 /Southeast Corn of the No ---- _ _ _ _ 2216.33 1474sa � Roadway � rtn OWNER: \ -of the line 1/4hof Section 2 1� be acquired---- r 1j /� 1/2 of the NW Comer of Section---'' N89 46 2T W / Casement to sC NICOLE J & BENJAMIN J LINDEN / oc \ PID: 28-037-2/-23-0008 28, Township 31, Range 21 by owner / NVJ • / 28, Township 31, Range 21 r- a / n r- T I r- A I 'Al a i A 1 1 - -r A I L_ 1 / `r V 1 h L7 I 'IV" / `r / /• �1• / 1 ;.r�1r 1 I v / �� 1/1 ✓• 1.// I ell j I / �- I i / C Jo 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Revisions: FENWAY LAND COMPANY e (A Carlson Suite , M I hereby certify that this plan, specification Print Name Thomas R. Balluff, L.S. DRAWN BY:KCM 1. 12/04/19 -Per City Comments 6 •environmental Blaine, (7 55489 orreport was prepared hameorundermy ��'/ RICE LAKE RESERVE • •engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 Lirecs Land and Signature: ISSUE DATE: 10/22/19 13925 Fenway Boulevard North PRELIMINARY PLAT Of •surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Land Surveyor under Hugo, Minnesota 13 C In the la Ws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License#: 40361 FILE NO: 1888 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 www.ca rlsonmcca i n. com sage wee. 1111/19 reomisms a°m--d o.o. III I \ B WETLAND OUTLOT A II III 4 h EXISTING WELL SHALL BE REMOVE &DISPOSE OF I I ` CONNECT TO EX. 12" S LED & CAPPED. REMOVE DISPOSE OF EXISTING SEPTIC & EXISTING SWIMMING POOL WM W/8"X12" WET SYSTEM. (FIELD LOCATE) TAP & 8' G.V. & BOX. \ a B- WETLAND _OUlLol III r A r 2 3 4 5 6 7 1 v 5' CONCRETE-,,\ 8 SIDE m�(T� \'\ 1214 tl �.It a f k IE 923.65 _- _._ -`-�r\ 15 - - 16 -�-�\ 17 I I� , I II CONNECT TO E%. 1 4" FORCEMAIN \, slue IE 923.25 2 E 923.15 E 21.95 5 IE 21.85 3 4 3p�=goMi�-'T�.\/ g s egc�rNc - IE 19.55 6 7 9 S� \� gig `�� 18 �• III V / 8 10 -' -- e r\� v\ 19 III Ili it I p LI LJ WETLAND J PROPOSED 4" PVC FORCEMAIN TO BE BURIED AT A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 8' 21 12 :E 92 85 �� O 13 14 -- 16 \ 17 i Y N \ NII ( I z IQ OUTLOT C OUTLET CON S TURE POND OUTLOT C I I k c CONNECT TO EX. WM STUB W/8" a / / T/ \ PROPOSED LIFT STATION I •il E' ILA _�_.-________-_ & BOX / e/ I'\ / / ______� - _ /� j ' 15 14 16/ -13 �, �� EXISTING WELL SHALL BE SEALED & CAPPED. REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXISTING SEPTIC SYSTEM (FIELD LOCATE). ------------ - 5' CONCRETE 2 SITE PLAN LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE -------- SETBACK LINE ------------- ------------- CURB ._.__.__._________________- BITUMINOUS- I CONCRETE . � I SANITARY SEWER - -------------- - WATER MAIN -I ----- I ----- ----- 'I - STORM SEWER ---------------- �< - WETLAND ------------- _ / FENCE ------- �T OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ----------- �\ I LIGHT POLE I \ /� ELECTRIC BOX TELEPHONE BOX �1+1 LJ IJ ! \ TELEVISION BOX ® POWER POLE \ - - - - - - - - - GN I I I I I I I I IE 918.44-S IE 918.34-W TORM SE'M1ER i "f I I 8' SANITARY PLUG1 IE 924.52 21 3 8" WATERMAINI PLUG PROVIDE ACCESS TO EXISTI D WAY IE 924.41-N IE 924.41-5 22 11'' 8" 6wNITARY PLUG _ I IE 924.31-W IE 921.10 i i,l RE 934.95 23 IE 921.48-NE a EXISTING DRI WAY t IE 919.17 IE 919.07 ---- IE 921.48-N , 921.38-SW ` •" -- -- "- PVC SA :. a- �-am - rc n m------ - STORM SR EVE SINGLE FAMILY 55' MIN. WIDE LOT 30' REAR SETBACK SIDE YARD SETBACKS GARAGE: 7.5 FT. BLDG PAD HOUSE: 7.5 FT. CORNER: 25 FT. 30' FRONT SETBACK R/W TYPICAL SERVICES SHALL BE: WATER: 1" COPPER TYPE K SEWER: 4" PVC SCH.40 3 STOP TO BE PLACED 10' BEYOND R/W ----- ---jv-� \---- - _ -- _ ---------- ---------------------. B f WATERMAI'NI` PLUG EXISTING HOUSE / i TT I �pST �� Jlli_P --_ - SIDEWALK 4' 24 a4` ' I� zs SIDE 20P'R IE 924.00 14 TYO3 4 10 115 131 9 12 \ \ LUG p�� A 15 WE 1 60' 7 T IE 922.6 / i I e- IE 824.52 H \ \ 19 �I a \ 20\ p m+ �m�• 5 16 pl I ( EXI NG DRIVEW Y u \ \F 9Gi' O n I l I EXISTING PUBLIC \ 21 .. 3 ,\ 4 1 7 �� I TURNOUS AIL / I N 4 \ IE 920. 3-E _ wnRrcs BUILDING 22 v� ` B 1 IE 919. 3-N �; / �, I BY 0 ERS l II \ 23 STR 32 2 11111 \ \ 24 --- -- 31 \ 18'' l6 k v 30 /' Ij l71 II OUTLOT C 25 29 WETLAND m o / ` IE 22.03 28 -_ mj a T`P�' IE 926.05J IE 927.22 I' 8" WATERLIfyN O IE 21.93 j I IE 925.99 ! !' PLUG �� OUTLOT C 19i j IE az7.12 �-� v / -- oe+-' A `_--- - ----/ \----_-_ 20'R J (TYPBUG - - - - - - - - - - Ygp _ I _ IE 26:30 ------ / N ---_ -- II I (IN FEET) \ m ENC ARK M"DOT G.detir "l-t Nomad Paw MN6T Remit, \ cGIG -N- N., !9r EI-1w = 9gz3e ET_ MNDOT Neoe Mommt Nomad tim o. gg Sta95087_ EI = 93239I FL-s° 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 1 herebycertifythat this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. KrystOfak, P.E. Drawn: KRO ReV151Ons: FEN WAY LAND COMPANY 7 (r� Carlson I Blaine, MN 55449 p p 2/4/19 per Comments •environmental or report was prepared by me or under my P y RICE LAKE RESERVE PRELIMINARY SITE & engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and that Iamaduly Signature: a // Designed: BJK 139Z5 Fenway Boulevard North Of McCain urveyin9 Fax: (76sonmcc7989 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota UTILITY PLAN i ? www.carlsonmccain.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Dale: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 1 J cI LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE — — — i EASEMENT LINE - �B LINE CI _ ------ 1 T-T / BITUMINOUS E-- 1'- CONCRETE "D —i 1 —, SANITAtY SEWER ----->— STQ i M SEWER ----- — >� WATER MAIN — — — a DENo,Es N— PRo1ECllon ij Ili j°liI + v j—vv— �v — OVERHEAD UTILITY STORM CATCH BASIN sioCM MANHOLE ® ® -- ®� I� \v-� 1 I /\/l ��/ -I MANHOLE �ro O O HYDRANT Y3' NH GATE VALVE li°a ourLOT n - \ ) TELEVISION BOX o v l�� / V l / 1 (� 1 -7 F� i� V A TELEPHONE Box o UTILITY PO TY PE w OHW - 9 5 RETAINI I If 'I I coesmucnoN V /� NG WALL I Illlll _ eNmanee �- - ) \.FENCE X Ifq...... = - - - ....: : -- - - ....._-----`il /\ i > // / \\ 10' CONTOUR / \ �� 2' CONTOUR 11103 I 10 '� �\ `\`� — `\ _ —�I I \ I\ `\ �RCWD FLOOD PLAIN —.* .*— '1 I I I \ % /�) " \ I / I I \ J I WETLAND LINE �1os SPOT ELEVATION _'�_ Ii " _ R �0 NO EMERGE Y OVERFLOW p eaa �. r109 I,\'�\\ `\'"': 1 i I ) \— 1 ( 44 x p� \\�� - � `cl oawoo FENCE ..0... - TREE FENCE ®® ®® GRADING LIMITS AAAAAA - PHASE LINE 11i Ilo��➢I �v �1 ,• Ir-7 r--- - __ `T�' = I w0 3oB i °w� '`v �� - - - - 1 vvv v BEELINE Y 1�Y1 solL BORING l y'It" I II1 I � �. I- wo_wo ewo� wo wo ' wo ' � % ;i ' �_ � v �_ ,„; � �• I _ s "�^ I I wo 1nV — - �� ,---��- _- - ��'1,, / % //i/ -_ i V v vV v --- / G 1as l III oo a . = eze_ai- v•� I 7 ouTLo �I - 1L79 `.L. 77aaoa IT 1100� 1I - , �c%_--�/ OUTLQT C 1-1 9127.3 - _--- - SHEET Il I , li i _n/ �" 16t 1fi2. A\ z •-� a�� s r d 111r Eql ceot�ownr \V v IIIy1lIIIlI�!II /�I ------------- V 7 ----- --- -- i `- - -- vh4 ij� 9 nSHEET 12 15\/ / INSHEET 10P css,i 7 RCnowa � I III' I� II �'<- ��, ^_� ,\\` sb� �3 0 �a o�' ` 21\� \\ s I 1 \ v o - � _ ,� � wol �.� - � .�2�0 col � 13 1aa ' 1 I I t31• � I I II I I f \ �•' \ w; •� ��` ' � .W�,° aW.a�° v, ; � s x ems' -' 9 \ ,w° \ Wol t �3 ' ` u , --- --- � P III II v•. sa v a� \ _ ' . �.` d� a a \ W0 9� 3s o= s I,l I A 9 + '� 0 \\\ .�. si��' % �°° ' wO �\ � �-�-� EEt e � ,�,� +\` ` -'Wo ` aw° o s3''3 `� z� � •. ��.. �8 � �, I as? � II��� i�il I O \ \ 5� "� .. .................. ' 7 \'•. o �=w III 11 II I I,I' F W,tnnNo \ \•. ,., � mya I � � i ! �_- �e--,�,- � , W ,,,.o \ t4 � � .../•'.\ � � �� ^ •\�'•., z7 rn 3§ g Iti } i I Ili 'i` � ��\\'• :: c ��6 ' ' �O / c -� - � o s,m tot � •• 140 50 too 200 I '\•_..y-W OUTLOT ca3 \` ; ' ----- CC 3 / V `v I I Il i illy I a,Ex vn N ts� � � �. ' i r ,ba WO i Lamo �s `I I .� W s' � � � .•:%- CP I - I M � / (SNOT s/sD,$)145 j `� 9`¢ _�vri' OUTLOT C (IN FEET) i 1 III jil I IIII �m\ `\�J ' i 152 i BENCHMARK r ;•a` /------__ K I __ ___ _ — a,a ,�,o _ V itGRAWL wl ���5•NN'=8 ` -- CaNs Uarl - J i ENmnNc/ � \\ CALL BEFO♦E'Y04W ��'V WETLAND FILL SUMMARY V/ / A I V A /� / /� � (y✓e,, ' V IV AREA ` \\ \\ — / / / r7 \ WETLAND FILL: 23,551 S.F. (0.54 Ac.) �i/ / Knowwhat'sbelow. v1 �1 /NOTE: WETLAND REPLACEMENT CREDITS TO BE PURCHASED Call before you dig. IN LIEU OF ONSITE REPLACEMENT. The subsurface utility information shown on this plan is utility Quality Level D. This quality I —el was determined a cording to the guidelines of Cl/ASCE 38-02, entitled "Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility Data 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I herebycertifythat this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian 1. Krvstofiak, P.E. Drawn: MO Rev1s 4/1 FEN WAY LAND COMPANY (r� Carlson I Blaine, MN 55449 or r p e o eci 1. 12/4/19 per City Comments 8 environmental eportwaspreparedbym rundermy RICE LAKE RESERVE • •engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and that Iamaduly signature: // Designed: BSK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North GRADING INDEX of McCain 'surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota WWW. carlsonmccain.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License*: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 13 save Dare. ,z/ea/,9 r.�lobz\a00,-BOzO\a0,s-aooENew\wE c3a\enalneeana\prelim olansaws_naae.awo nl,, on,e NOTES: 1. ACCESS TO EXISTING HOMES AND WELLHOUSE SHALL BE MAINTAIiNED AT ALL TIMES. WETLAND FILL 2. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH SMALL UTILITIES FOR UTIL17 I III 2780 S.F. RELOCATIONS: -✓\ OUTLOT A ( J / GRAVEL 3. CONTACTOR TO COORDINATE WORK ON GOODMEW AVENUE WITH-STREEL� WETLAND \ �( I III I CONSTRUCTION AND UTILITY CONTRACTOR TO MINIMIZE DISRUPTION TO EXISTING OHW = 922.5 ENTRANCE PROPERTIES. ---� r^"�'s'�� �� J z '•. • t • ---- " EXISTING SWIMMING '930' Py • • • _ a_e • .. .... • .�-�.-..i.ii�.-.-.• .. ��<• \ 0 25 50\ �00 �� i.. �•�,� POOL TO BE REMOVED \ .-.T, a �e�a. oz .�,.�>zss-J .. - IL�J so--• •-• \ \ �� •i-__ \� FEET \ \\\� yD 934 " "•� a� j�� _r---1 f ----1 F - - - -- I-�- �\ \\_ �7Tp9y� �_ \ (INi )) �� • " z� �-9zes / 112 6 �� i - :, _ r o �� 1 I I 102 I I I I (n�dd � __ \ \ � - �'�'�"�•�,r, \ \ _ �- � � / .u,� o a �iJ--93� I I 930.5 z03 I I 'ia5 1 7� 1 06�, \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ *�- '. cslD smtBENCHMARK\ \ s �r I ''_,,, ±� l 930.5 929.5 I 1 1 \ s slemnp<a--� • \ ` \ ' i M DOT GeoEet red Pa112- u MNDT Reset. / 22 5 ' �2& 3; °O \ /' 1I t _ _ _ _ _ 930.0 - 930.0 930.0.- 930• / / - - 1-�\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ���" ;��•\ \ z srvooT c.easoa2.wt oe i as' i`s D1 g?6 JI 0 �m z 9 M s38pos�c Nao-xso-- 1FWO .5 G 937.5 I aoxso) �s/a oo9 9•0 e?1909 I 9/ 1 V �\• v \ I / s2o s3s J I I I G# 93>.Rom__ \ `\ PN 4+60 -J L J L I I � I I \ S \ \ \ \ \ I .. a .. e e • • • . • • • • . . .. .. .. .. _ o.o / ' • • .. ;za , 112 / /i' �, e1� • ' • • : , I I.• �,� _ , _a+oD �- z.e r s Py / / > SG / / op / 930' ° / p s W 30 3�5 7 �. e 9 S Q o�_y o �� 114 / r \ \ \ \ �• .\ V.G o 930.0 /- �� �' . , 93G.5 _ II II � � ��•••� \ - �� � >.- one% _� a � � / & h WQ, g395 / / 1 5\/ \� A v•. v\ 936_\- a Vo+oc a g�'S0 , 9 8.0 / aoxso / / aoxso' `aoxso G 937.8 y° \ v' ' c L G 937 rvp 0 '-----� I° W0, I aoxso aoxso I I G_ 3 / > � ' ••S l l 40k6- Wp 0 9� ' I I9 00 - < 4�2 I I L Ia0k6 / l l � >y ss? \�\ / ¢+ 0 \ • 30.0 30.3 l i I I I I szs.e is. c E L1p i__ 186 I 1 929.3 93p3 / -f.J _i L 1 87 J I I I ZI€ \ �LL� 8' BITUMINOl15 TRAIL �} l I,IOW "+����aiai�.�<<� vs see 185 1 / ?98 93p3, wp / aoksp e 100 YR HWL = 926.3 y� \ \ - w L� $4 92s.'g s wQ 'oxs 8.°/ IZq�lND FILL • . 183 Cp 937. 0116,1 �' �II i�llQ / / \ � /' �"J---------------- ,_ � L�'o2 , � ,�T / / 3p.0 9 WQ l l aoXs�Bl / `� � __sss--_ - 4.��• --- Q�Nc��-N's',, �� L CORLGglCi1 FE/y / 93\ s �+ ao • �\ I` 'mod --\z6 ., 5 Mp�f AD Cf / 3p3 °o 3� c> W // \� N ;f _____9ia.s_ 7f G/ / g 'Y6 •S 3 T \ S ?9. m I � . �92s• � I I i eorroM _--�sz3s, y l 8 III 5 ` jg2" 9za za. z m l / / ez L 179 II III doll --- i , s3 - ---- �.�� a Iml 8eiiUMrN LJ7$ / / / 932 �� 'o� I WETLAND FILL 3s-8 II I j 1 C9 rrm� z I 6804 S_F. _ _ - - \ Rq 1 L i L176 N, • o y _ _ OUTLOT C �� o • � eencH - s\ 4-s POND 100 J 3a. _36.8r- - NWL = 924.5 � �- \ � - - --- 1 l // :• �/ �3s oy 100 YR HWL = 927.3 �• �� �� �r - ----- t Ee�� i / i�161II ���\ w �� 11•�1�� ��-_ J s �� .� 1/ I � I l � 1 � ,•' \ _- _ 0 930 �t /• ••I - I--\ \\ � 900• ? - 83p.So FENCE INSTALL /SILT FENCE AFTER GRADING IS I` COME \ \ m.� Imil ll r-74 mNmW figx�". J l - - •• II II � III I �� a � � , l 60 �x6� na0k6o se / / `v • �, `, `� ; '1 �I -- � I o I ��t I I IaII-§ --- - -- - oy \ 3a' c / // ` '••` J __- __ o «cJ J�• I Ig OwJO'•J�• G 9 // i1i- / a III ` ` WETLAND FILL / \`--------- ---- -- - - A -� �+ 0 \ �'' - 16� I •• \_60078 S.F. _ v ` � yT � / 3�98 // TT 1165 I � iL- `,� "< M...�<- ..- "<-� "<- "<- "<- "< ". �,,.c .. -r -� ° � _ c +s s32Q8 // / ''sue > ���- eza_ - ___-� •�, 172 +�% sx x. I II d�� t� ;\ I w `�x\W I 3s� wy6 / �; ly / 16`6� / ••�•_� � _,_� \ 171 \ s33° � � '\5>� P -P" � o. II I` 167X 169 v 1 1 S 93 0 I �I t yi '4 / �/ ?98 929• 0 �� �8-'� /+ �' � I I � s i \ I � � peg. \ �e > •J \ • \ / ao Q / 93p 3 1 9 I I e g30 3 aoxs 0 \ a - � e+D°, , � 6 i W� I II it �'• p�� / / s�s� ��y `� kaoX�� �5 oo ' ' t •. o / 9 / / oo r J L` 93>9 1 I K oxso aoxso 93� $ ao� II Is \ \'.• \ 58 \ `Okso j c�,y3 // / �•�^ �� 1I G 937.8 I I!I I I SEE SHEET 10a 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I hereby certify that this Ian, s fcation Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. Drawn: keD Revisions: FE N WAY LAND COMPANY �jCarlson I Blaine, MN 55449 o report fy p peci 1.12/4/19perCityComments RICE LAKE RESERVE PRELIMINARY GRADING 9 • environmental report was prepared by me or under my • •engineering Phone: (763) 489-7900 direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Signature: /J Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North of McCain •surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota & EROSION CONTROL PLAN W-carlsonmccaln.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License#: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 13 ,aye Dare. tz,oaito r:,Ioe:,soot-aozo,soss-eooaview,caa cla,eneineeanR,orenm oianseoss_eaae.ewn ni,, on,� 60—q SEE SHEET 9 / / - 4oxs 7> 7 �3g 0 �G 4oxsp� l W 3p.0 /� • I I \ VA \ \ b9�� / / G & l 4oYo� G�,98.3 G�97.8I I3\` sokc `>" /G aoxso — — °I I II d ' W0, I 8 WO aox6o aoxso aoxso 8 I I Gn 93 / ' / 3 a 9 • / x S / / aoxso / / \ •: aoxso \ " I X I 930.0 oxsoa II I � ----f 929.5 930.5 / , >, \ — „y° / e` ri,GO .. s3 / �'. / / -- 90 •S 1 \ \ IQ s e I 192 I - I_ 929. 9303 aoxso" l l 8 / l l �\ °� a S•/� .. 6— / ' / / i/ J..... i 11 Z` ����llEE•y.,� 92E L1� 87�IIT, `t III — _ — a' elrumlNo 186 I \ 9,g03 r�' / li aoxso' I 93g / / �� �5 �3 3g� .'�� , ' A• 11`SN w — l LaJ s • - - « s2a — _ /\ 93 aoxso / G A/ / III I 1 I � TLAND 20 � -•++��+-•-•• zo = 100 YR HWL 926.3 — ``' w . , v.s — Z�84 j l 929g , w a 938.0 \ oN III 9 '0xso Gp �— 3 Z WE FILL OUTLOT C Sass s.F. --- ---__ s3os I � � � � 1$2 �8 / 93p gFSTAC' g/ 0 93p.S WO l l aoxso / / C A AV _—.36syy_ TeR C F dd I �yC N 9 C G E9,3+ o \ �— 2s 2x � 0 Rq NO r- / M _ E/�� � i— I i 928 � I / -- 33 � J / 930 ` 10 � � • I — m � �z<- �- �. �I -'� / --- gz -----yyyyy ,1,79 / � / / s�s:a �3 O � i �; � o A�11 O LL 178 r. WETLAND HILL— Nous �illi IC9� / 804 S.F. _---- ----- �— ------ — _ F -�s - - _-- \ TLQT\ C - — \-' :s � 76�` �:�- ",a .• v-t� � - —,j I v OU •• T ,•• O POND 100 —' �y ���• �O x o \ \ I NWL = 924.5 I �II / i ry� ill • • — — ,'\3s 10� YR HWL = 927.3 j j a ee / / ��\ j ' '/ / 9za • / •' �1 C0 W 0. Lin� 121 �1I I 15 I\ i�/.'•� \ 0 930 � � v / � INSTALL SILT FENCE II I i a V '�•, \ \ g30? 93p.S / �Y �� �� AFTER GRADING IS I � / -- ---�•—• COMPLETE ------------- f3= ---------------i 1 --_ -- i --- —— 1- 2 160 :-- —yt -- � G I �� 1� I�14� o,wt�..m.m.a i � �\\\ �Qo o \ ��J L \ // 0 fis°/� / j�4./ //-\ •• ��— 10078 S.F. 929 --'_ --- — �— CIS--,I�— --- — _ c'—r-- --- — — �O°�, / •�\ \ --- ----'' `r$ ° m 12J I j 1159\ °.� 1 rc 36.i ` 3 / �3 / r�—i6„ •• —1 \ 1 72 ,tee\ ' '� +go I d� � dy � •� I o 0 0 � I �x � ;p \ !, x�o 9 \� r�--� �--- � 171 933 g) � i , �, ,,, �C. , � 9 \ 1g30• \ � a � 1 H IV 1�•\ ( a / z: • g / 3 167 r I 170 \ 930 s� \ m� w 169 168 ! 1 g3Q�, a i W 5 I � I �I 1 a �, \ \. IL � � Gc s \ i � 6 � 3' \ .. �\ // 3) ° O / 930.3 929.8 I I 929.8 g30 3 wp �q0 g3g 0 \ t,�\> � a•oo / , 1 (n � \\ �36 / 1(G ao Q\ li Wp 83'•` \ �� /� -o�� I °o /'�/_ -\ N ��•• � s a / / s3 � � " � ^ wo I � � 1 aox6� \ 93 \ � � 1 I 1 \ t� . °o / /93 / / y7 r J L 93 Wp Wpm 1 1., 9 g u G v i • 'm` �0 3� l \ \ 58 <°ks / m / �' \I 11 GKaoxsa aoxso 1 1- 3�• s \ \ .x I �� � I I � I � � V �'.• A 936 / I \\� 57 // / 92gs° �0 / // \ c \ / ' •�.. (sows.-3 9'� �n0x6o \ \ WO g3�,o k I WETLAND \ \ �'' °O+so: / // ' 3 7 - 3J / / g3g 5 r \Np g315 141 a I <o S / G aox6° g31 II \ ��,'••:: 155 / / 929• /w, xs° / l o — 936 y3la'r \ p 142, aoxso ' / / Ge I I I I I 1\ 1 93T' " \ I�b I II OUTLOT C \ v �54 / / 8200 WO I "aoxs I G., 937.5I 937.5mGI Ig37.5'� 1 1 p g305 I ��' 'i I� I A / gS ° aox6a ' • �� II III WATER ELEVATION t925.5. — �� / // g3 o WO 40, p nQxso WQ w g2g 8 \ 9 4 _ r•��'�' (SHOT 5/2019) 1 \ \\ \ 153 s2g s - WO 145 15•i d < 3 95 , r =art=jam. � � � � I � �A / 9929 0 I 930.0 930.0.5 929.5 I I 929 6 11 11 92 \V A N 2 / / 5 I I 9 ) — 151 I I 1 1 / 150 149 148 ' I III, \ /•`\ —\J L-- �— 928Anim I Its II I I I° (IN FEET) BENCHMARK dj— Named I=aei yj` . MNGOT Geodetic Monument NNai Reset, �l----_-- _ _ d+.- - d G9p Station Na. 94000. Elewtion - 932.30 FT. S-i- Geodetic Monument Named Eagle. GBIa m II Station Ne, 95007. Elewtion - 932.39 FT 3590 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I hereb rti that this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. Drawn: keD ReO'a'° FEN WAY LAND COMPANY T)lCarlson I Blaine, MN 55449 ° yce fy p peci 1.12/4/19perCityComments RICE LAKE RESERVE PRELIMINARY GRADING 10 • environmental report was prepared by me or under my • •engineering Phone: (763) 489-7900 direct supervision and [hat 1 am a duly Signature: /J Designed: sJlc 13925 Fenway Boulevard North of McCain •surveying Faz: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota & EROSION CONTROL PLAN www.Wrlsonmccain.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License#: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 13 sage oare.,z,oait9 r:,ioez,soo,-aozo,soss-eooaview�caa cla�enelneean9,orenmulanseoss_eraae.ewn nl,, on,� yy. SEE SHEET 9 �w� �� _ r J H 0 r 9J < sax cD rn<O �� \ • I I \ /� \I \ \ aW� / I 3a 5 •s �� it � 69 " '�1 n N o6.8 J.rn o �w- 15 o e,� " - �° ; — I i I EXISTI G ROADWAY V w I EASM NT ' r • I Ph 2+59 1+00 �_—J �3i0 —I 5.6R G7 ,(].--0O J}• —/—/—\ � ------/ / �/ _ \M' •\M •�+�i4_ v— — •• �a.9•as•.�o�•• W EL e37.70 1 50'C) 50' V.C.) •••• -- I \\_---// r'M�+— 3 $.sus-- •a n ------oe�_35 L -s 34.Q� 3 4 r f- - - - < ITr' ICA°� a� r 12.i 3 s v.c. � -- r--------s•\ va\ g0% \ 50 _ — —1 r 934 — 3 .0 1 1 I 172 /� n vv� •��' •� qs6 y+4 pv` �93a -, I G I I 935.0 m 936.0 �G 1 37.5 � .� om (V .� �€ y v / 3 R \ / 1 1 93 •0 1 aox7a" 4ox7a" ao� a tdni � o vA. ` \ ,�g35.0 1 �,1 4ox74 I I }� rnrn 0 � o 0• i •A -v A G o I I I 1� 1 �Os a 3.zx SOG II 11 SOG 1 SO�i 306 3a.d v J m Jg ' ro r L 4S° G\ " EASMENTW ""r s to > '� o G'noxeI° v v 0�2� vv v 133 �w .m I6 y.00 ! -- — .e G Y ° \\ \ G x W� \ \ 0\ `r,I � Na m5- 0 \ Ao `�" C sa D 9 \ \ 9 g`• t,1y° \\ V�O 1? \ 31 \ \�' I `N`"N`' \ x Ca •� `� 'vs.'G s� � � ' \ pG\ \\g3gg�60 \ \\ QVvo 93� 0 \ g/ \\ \ 138 \ Z> 'g/3em9 °s°X36��• 9G3\9 4w9y3,96001 \\ \� \\ \9\`\ a`oVt,`'�6gO03��\\ \ \ \V\�ggO3�,5o \ \ \ \ gg33, \ \•>\•\ \ ,•!- �/>�\ �•— •,•-•9•--•-> -- ---• /' ��•�`\ ``930 \ -`� ..f.�./i .'^.... �\. `•\••• •.• r1$ 1I fLo 11 of aW ! .............13 14 ............ 141 27 Mon vg 14� ou 'I z g3 \ V A �� •• i � �� �°' 3 I � � 9 g.8 • a � 145 \ \\- 4-4 •� •'% l ) ) n• > r_= =�_ v > OUTLOT C In25i 5; Cam on � 1 2 r --j"- A �Is- GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ---�\ ENTRANCE 0 25 50 ,o0 (IN FEET) ,arm/ � / BENCHMARK MNDOT Geo .e Monument N— Paul MNDT Reset, z.iiNoO*tceoa•uo 7, EGm1m"uo 9 a shzcsio / \I Station No. 9808]. flewtim 932.39 FT. 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I hereb rti that this Ian, s fcation Print Name: Brian J. KrystoflA, P.E. Drawn: keo ReMislons: FEN WAY LAND COMPANY T)Carisqn I Blaine, MN 55449 o rCe p peC1 112/4/19perCityComments RICE LAKE RESERVE PRELIMINARY GRADING 11 • environmental report was prepared by me or under my •engineering Phone: (763) 111-1111 direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Signature: /J Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North of McCain •surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota & EROSION CONTROL PLAN www.carlson mccain.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License#: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 13 sage Dare. tz,oai,9 ,:voe:\soot-aozo\soss-9ooaview\caa c3a\eneineean9\orenm oianseoss_eaae.ewn ni,, CIM TURF ESTABLISHMENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL APPLY TO ALL DISTURBED AREAS AND SHALL BE ACCORDING TO MnDOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION (LATEST EDITION) EXCEPT AS MODIFIED BELOW. TURF ESTABLISHMENT SHALL OCCUR AS SOON AS POSSIBLE BUT IN NO CASE MORE THAN 7 DAYS. SEED: MnDOT MIXTURE 25-141 AT 60 POUNDS PER ACRE. DORMANT SEED: SHALL BE APPLIED AT TWICE THE NORMAL RATE AFTER NOVEMBER 1ST. MULCH: TYPE 1 AT 2 TONS PER ACRE (DISK ANCHORED). FERTILIZER: TYPE 1 10-10-10 AT 200 POUNDS PER ACRE. LOT BENCHING DETAIL LOT PROFILE TION DIRECOF FLOW (LOT) STREET PROFILE DIRECTION OF FLOW (STREET) 0.5' 0.5' 0.5' INFRASAFE — 2'x3' DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE AS MANUFACTURED BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS "- HDPE INSERT BASKETS I SHOWN W/OUT FILTER BAGS 400 MICRON FILTER BAGS I° REQUIRED INSIDE BASKETS pt 2'x3' HDPE FRAME INSERT EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PORTS - MEETS MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3891.E "STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - FILTER BAG INSERT" - DESIGNED FOR NEENAH R-3067 OR R-3290 SERIES TREE FENCE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE R IIN.) MIN. TYPICAL POND SECTION 4 4 70:7 N.WL 10:1 3 � 3 1 a 1 10 � BOTTOM 0 VARIES--� INFRASAFE — 27" DEBRIS COLLECTION DEVICE AS MANUFACTURED BY ROYAL ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES HDPE INSERT BASKETS SHOWN W/OUT FILTER BAGS 400 MICRON FILTER BAGS REQUIRED INSIDE BASKETS 2X3 HDPE FRAME INSERT .� EMERGENCY OVERFLOW PORTS - MEETS MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3891.F "STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION - FILTER BAG INSERT" - DESIGNED FOR NEENAH R-3250-A OR R-3250-1 (MNDOT 801) FRAME CASTING SILT FENCE FILTER FABRIC (36" MAX. HEIGHT) COPOLYMER BARRIER FENCING ANCHOR W/ METAL OPENING IN FABRIC WEAVE < 212 pm ANCHOR W/ METAL o�*�/ (48" HEIGHT) T-POST OR WOOD. V T-POST OR WOOD 2"X2" OR 2"X2" STAKE NOTES TRENCH DIRECTION OF FLOW li III —� III-1 I III i i7111- o I I, II II UNDISTURBED SOIL UNDISTURBED SOIL 1. TREE FENCING SHALL BE PLACED A MINIMUM OF 1 F00T PER CALIPER INCH OF TREE DIAMETER FROM TREE(S) THAT IS/ARE TO BE SAVED. 2. ANCHOR POST MAY BE SPACED UP TO 10 FEET APART. 3. SECURELY ATTACH TREE FENCE TO ANCHOR POSTS W/ MINIMUM OF TWO ATTACHMENTS PER POST 4. SEE MNDOT SPECIFICATION 2572. NOTES 1. DIG A 6"X6" TRENCH ALONG THE INTENDED SILT FENCE LINE. 2. DRIVE ALL ANCHOR POSTS INTO THE GROUND AT THE DOWNHILL SIDE OF THE TRENCH. 3. POSTS SHALL BE SPACED A MAXIMUM OF 6 FEET APART. 4. LAY OUT SILT FENCE ALONG THE UPHILL SIDE OF THE ANCHOR POSTS AND BACK FILL 6"X6" TRENCH. S. SECURELY ATTACH SILT FENCE TO ANCHOR POSTS W/ MINIMUM OF THREE ATTACHMENTS PER POST. 6, SEE MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS 2573 & 3886. SUBGRADE CORRECTION 2'� SELECT BACKFILL J l MATERIAL COMPACTED BACKFILL NON -SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL COMPACTED BACKFILL OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE 100 (POND 100) GALVANIZED GRATE (SPLIT) 4"X4" OPENINGS 92).5 48" DIA. FLOW NWL P100 24„REP 924.3 1' MIN. F�Ep 3.s 924.5 2" CP 921.0 0.5' TOPSOIL GRADE FINISHED GRADE EXISTING GRADE \\ // LIMIT OF SUBGRADE EXCAVATION SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL oR OAF GR NON -SELECT BACKFILL MATERIAL MAX. COMPACTED BACKFILL MAX*MA 10.0' —1ll�-IF MIN. BOTTOM OF-HNSTABLE MATERIAL 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 1 herebycertifythat this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. Drawn: KRO Re"Zi°1� FEN WAY LAND COMPANY 1 Z / (r� Carlson I Blaine, MN 55449 p p 2/4/19 per City Comments •environmental or report was prepared by me or under my RICE LAKE RESERVE engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and that Iamaduly Signature: a // Designed: BJK 139Z5 Fenway Boulevard North DETAILS Of surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota McCain www.carlsonmccain.com the laws ofthe State of Minnesota Dale: SO/22/19 License 26063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 13 SINGLE FAMILY HOLDOWNS SINGLE FAMILY HOLDOWNS 55' LOTS 55' LOTS WALKOUT NO SCALE RAMBLER It NO SCALE RONT serBACK) 25•�60� TYPICAL STREET SECTION �30'?CK) x 60' I I 60' R/W — 30' B/B (CENTERLINE OFFSET) (FRONT SETFINISHED GRADE GRADING GRADE FINISHED GRADE I O 10• GRADING GRADE I R/W R/W 1n 1n I 1L i 30' 30' - ____ __ _ ___ _ 15' 15' 15' 15' 2g' __- TOPSOIL I n To' ¢� m I (FACE TO FACE) SLOPE 2% J7:�i!MOUNTABILE d ______ __I�� 0.5' MIN. I — --- TOPSOIL2.5'0.5' TOPSOIL CONCRETE CURB 2.75' I GUTTER 0.5' TOPSOIL TC = CL-.19' MODIFIED RAMBLER MODIFIED WALKOUT *PAVEMENT SECTION NO SCALE NO SCALE 1.5"-TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 30' *60' 2.5"-TYPE SP 12.5 BITUMINOUS NON -WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) ((FRONT SETBACK) 30' *60, 8" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE (CLASS 5 OR CLASS 7), MNDOT 3138 FINISHED GRADE (FRONT SETBACK) 25' 24" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW, MNDOT 3149 N GRADING GRADE I I 12" SUBGRADE EXCAVATION � WoJ2� I *FINAL SECTION TO BE VERIFIED /MATCH EXISTING SECTION I i10' 10 O l` FINISHED GRADE 1 0.5, MIN. 10' TOPSOIL I GRADING GRADE I I � I I I 10'16 I I ~ 0.5' MIN. I 2.75' I --- TOPSOIL 0.5' TOPSOIL 2 0.5' TORSO SLAB ON GRADE It NO SCALE It LOOKOUT �30' #74' I NO SCALE (FRONT SETBACK) 1 FINISHED GRADE iSIG GRADING GRADE j i (FRONT SETBACK) 25' * 60' ' : 0.2' TOPSOIL To' �P 0.5 MIN. TOPSOIL FINISHED GRADE GRADING GRADE � I I _______ __ _ _____ 2 1d o 0 0.5' MIN. TOPSOIL 2.5' 0.5' TOPSOIL �- UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN MODIFIED LOOKOUT NO SCALE 30, *60 :(FRONT SETBACK) 25'� I LO(2) n FINISHED GRADE 10' GRADING GRADE � 1 6 0.5' MIN. '6-------- TOPSOIL 2.5' GRADING PLAN LOT KEY 0.5' TOPSOIL 9.4----T oIF DRAINAGE & UTILITY �_ BLOCK NUMBER EASEMENT G LOT NUMBER lJ LOWEST FLOOR ELEVATION SURFACE DRAINAGE ` HOUSE TYPES I R RAMBLER OR SPLIT ENTRY GROUND ELEVATION 961.0 LO RAMBLER LOOKOUT OR SPLIT 0 BUILDING /961 5 ENTRY WALKOUT WO —RAMBLER WALKOUT 1 SE —SPLIT ENTRY RECOMMENDED 0 2/ SE WO —SPLIT ENTRY WALKOUT GARAGE SIDE I CG—CUSTOM GRADING SOG—DENOTES SLAB ON GRADE FINISHED 0 ELEVATION L c 1 J DENOTES STEP CONDITION (IN 6- STEPS) I OT CORNFR �. . j STREET (r� Carlson •environmental 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 Blaine, MN 55449 1 herebycertifythat this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. KOstofak, P.E. p r or report was prepared by me or under my Drawn: KRO ReV151On' 2/4/19 per City Comments FEN WAY LAND COMPANY 13925 Fenway Boulevard North RICE LAKE RESERVE 13 / McCain engineering surveying I Phone:'763, 489-7900 Fax: (763)489-7959 direct supervision and that I amSignature: a // Licensed Professional Engineer under Date: 10/22/19 License#: 25063 Designed: BJK Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 Hugo, Minnesota DETAILS Of 13 www.Carlsonmccain.com the laws ofthe State of Minnesota VICINITY MAP LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE EASEMENT LINE CURB LINE ___________ BITUMINOUS CONCRETE SANITARY SEWER ----->----->— STORM SEWER----->r---->� —»>� WATER MAIN OVERHEAD UTILITY ---^--- R o EcnoN STORM CATCH BASIN STORM MANHOLE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE O MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE D4 TELEVISION BOX ❑ T TELEPHONE BOX ❑ UTILITY POLE `o> RETAINING WALL FENCE x 10, CONTOUR 2' CONTOUR FEMA FLOOD PLAIN WETLAND LINE SPOT ELEVATION _00'0_ E.I.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW • 0 000.0 SILT FENCE .............. TREE FENCE GRADING LIMITS LIMITS TREELINE (YWl'Wl'1 SOIL BORING KEY DENOTES TREE O TO BE SAVED DENOTES TREE TO BE REMOVED NOTE: REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT INFORMATION. N BENCHMARK 0 50 100 200 t, MNDOT I-- Monument Named —1 MNDT Reset, GIII Station No, 94600. Elevation 9}2.39 IT, 2. MNDOT Geodetic Monument Named Eagle, GSID Staten No. 950a7. Eleva— = 932.39 FT. (IN FEET) 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I hereb cer[if that this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. Drawn: KRO ReV151O"�' FE N WAY LAND COMPANY T 1 / Carlson Blaine, MN 55449 y y p r 2/4/19 per City Comments •environmental or report was prepared by me orundermy P y RICE LAKE RESERVE I :engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and that Iamaduly Signature: Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of surveying Faz: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota McCain www.carlsonmccain.com the lawsoftheStateofMinnesota Date: 10/22/19 License#: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 / T5 �I WO 29.5 W WO \WO w0 937, 8 930.0 WO 929\ 930.0 9930.8 30.3 929.8 930 3 II -9\:0 f 192 191 �89 929.8 930.3 z 9.2 AI)WETLAND 188 1187 86 ML0 INDUS 20 185 100 YR HWL = "26.3 0 mm m �a m *no 1765 k �,'•• ° (I _--------- /0 0 -- ,776 OUTLOT A / I GRAVEL S WETLAND I I III CONSTRUCTION / OHW = 922.5 i \ ENTRANCE �I••D 300�_ / / s� •0 l 93 • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • Rid-•. 9 e_• • • • • • • • • • • Tf'.-.-• �L r C•i?�1 • • RD �996 7'I•Tr \ \ �92a. 934 2 / D,996, 9 ,9 \� ---_I ' 1 02 103 106 I `FM 930.5 / I• s3o rt / / 93 930.09.5 930.0 �rl I r 94 -.937.5 G w . OI D s20g \09 \\\ -RDrsea W (2922 UR 1 0.° I g - � �AVv�T•�� ��zs 112 113 -°"��\� \� s A II �•f> I o � � � � �, >x f ,966 3j WO 3ps 114 9'6' \ \ ' • �_\ �iQ X - 930 \ �cv"• m"°'�` " o ,'� F� M` l q m m m m �° 9 m �-° m RD M >FM m a m �Iy o - r h m �- S G � �-�„ >r'.�"� 937.5 G v \ 936 WD M 34 7 �l - 938.0 G ll r \ I I \ \ III 937.5 G 9350- - - - �FM s / D ,97a G 938. 2 V \ \ j I G 938.0 9 G 937.8 G 93 \35.3 ~\ _ / ° G 93�. 8 i- \ Wo p .8 G W O 83j 8 G �93p8 g Wo 9�8 G � 930 92g 8 wo 84 g2g.3 183 / gz98 1 2 1.8 1 /WoB7// G 93j'8 _ AFAR S/(T1 P8 T 93p'g g v Wo o'�.F ram s0 g 23 v°1177 I ��------- 9i4.5_g H, •s2s\.\ �+lifP(,�r AD/pG/ 929'3 W ,a D a a anJ,g a° s1 �, �s2s• orroM sp35 _ 8 g3p3 179 9zs.e e° ea° o° o„�q � // I.�• //mI _-- • OUS 178 O RD,e1 'S 90796 O'8;51°OUT\L 9T C 3L I( TRD 81 RD1182D � / NCH O NWL �• y II I / /�/ •'• •���� s� s� �O�xv 10� YR HWL 927.3 vv�•. ` �� ' I iRD 181'\tN' 1822 D D 0 0 / �• /} / 8 • J \ �\ \ •• N1 �wC �O � 1823 o � /a rs=`naa161 16 c � ,Rp161 INSTALL SILT FENCE I\ ��,• g3p .1 • vv v v Iml � I I I I it �D ,azs � rao ,> rra° s. z Izs -r<D 7 41 sD I 9g0?, 930._5 � \\ \\ AFTER GRADING IS 1z II 1 74 �o i RD i / v COMPLETE 1 ill' I ------- mD,a---"--------- Ica a- t,� --JI-- -- - - 'IT}�T - - \ ----�� u ' 1RD 172 D w J O I II - - - - - - - - ° '.�i� - O.0 g38 9380 >A IOU. ^P 1 - - - � .7 ,• EOM - - - _I 1 hRD s,6C °o my ra1706; °�P ° inn �r� / 11 �1 •' 1°1 I cv I -- 'Mir -------- 73 yyy��gRD l y. W ^ v 121 �Li�i09 I LEGEND EXISTING PROPOSED EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE UilLiIY POLE --. EASEMENT LINE - - - - - - ----- RETAINING WALL KEY INCURB LINE _____= FENCE BITUMINOUS E----] 0 10, CONTOUR CONIFEROUS DECIDUOUS CONCRETE [ ] 0 2' CONTOUR DENOTES TREE SANITARY SEWER ----->- FEMA FLOOD PLAIN TO BE SAVED STORM SEWER - WETLAND LINE SPOT ELEVATION -••-- ° --••- x DENOTES TREE TO X X WATER MAIN ----- - OVERHEAD UTILITY a = DENOTES INLET ROTECTIou E.O.F. BE REMOVED ®® STORMpRMTMA EMERGENCY OVERFLOW �a �� ppp.p BENCHMARK HAo�E ®® SILT FENCE • • .. • rjQT OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE Q TREE FENCE o 0 o v v .. et REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE 0 25 50 1pp1.MNDOT -IN, N-d P-1 MNDT R-t, MANHOLE !7 GRADING LIMITS n IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL EPALCEMENT MID statio. No. 9aeoo. Dewtlon = 111- IT. DOT c ,U, No.umr.t N-d Ea9I•, OsiD HYDRANT fY uR TREELINE 1 INFORMATION. statio. No. -57. E-- - 932.39 IT. GATE VALVE X (IN FEET) TELEVISION BOX ❑ SOIL BORING TELEPHONE BOX ❑ (r� Carlson I environmental engineering 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive Blaine, MN 5) 489 Phone: (763)489-7900 NE, Suite 100 1 herebycertifythat this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. p p or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and thatIamaduly 6ignatDre: a // Drawn: KRO Designed: BJK Re"ibi°"51 2/4/19 per City Comments FEN WAY LAND COMPANY 13925 Fenway Boulevard North RICE LAKE RESERVE TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T2 of ° surveying McCain Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Date: 10/22/19 License#: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 Hugo, Minnesota T5 www.Carlsonmccain.com the laws of the State of Minnesota IIII E51 `TRDffi�Ti a33 r� D �926 Ill BOTTOM --\ '923.5—� II �[i�RD I O B55 179 929.8 III Q TRD 1.1d TRD ART �0 0 / II ail O '�`O 4i0 P`e a° ° t'+°��n a a�'�'.� 1. imI / \— 891 rud 1pOOs 178 D,en a°..oFO� $, 1•'I I \ I'��— —\— Alt \ 177` wD, RD 1e12 x° n'/ m z I _---_—_---_--_\\ �^m D / 1°•°' `I D es o^ ry 11'••I/ " OUTLgT C _ POND 100 —� •. VIII mD I61% RD 1ezD — y Bob N WL = 924.5 ' I j 10YR HWL = 927.3 RD, y '. II I I 7 8244T33 D DD0,822 00� o ���„„„�/LARD t]33j l �/ • 928 • \` \\\ ��\ �\ \•' N1 ����hhhtT�''O 161 1.��— o 3 0 9 I ice• \ �•• • 1 9pI 61 / 0� 9`30.0 ` INSTALL SILT FENCE I m PI I II I1 I III 11 I— d iRD 18 yy�. TRR12 ----- —-------- D-- "Wo- D�6— 1eI]5 >D5— 11] • 3 HZfifRD 3160 ZERO+ °, f ~ ,748 ' I i I it -III\ � 1 �➢ 1]1 ,n D 1]00 � IIID. �--------- — -- ,B],----------� �R�] 4 76 q1 RD -- gg 05 93Qg \ \� AFTER GRADING IS II III �� I C PLETE 174 �o O 1.� I 8 O \ �� � R c P O n �pC C Xq�— / I 1 1• � TC 36.1 lj�� ll �I ���, • �� — 5.6 � III II 11 I�j( �.• I I �I III I ^ `t•• � LG��o ' I1�II 1 I \ 58 \ s 9 0 'Po TRD VD,RD aa\\ \ 9295� 93 � 1'I„ III TrD,7D5, WETLAND 41 ^° Dnm I111p11 i 1-1 ••: •. � I I� �I � Ilil I I ��\'••, ��6 I I jI 1� \� •., �1 OUTLOT C III li III WATER ELEVATION ±925.5. I11�� II III I� (SHOT 5/2019) 1 III III !iI LMOD EXISTING PROPOSED PROPERTY LINE — — — EASEMENT LINE ----- ------ CURB LINE ====== BITUMINOUS E----� 0 CONCRETE e ] 0 SANITARY SEWER ----->— STORM SEWER ----->— >TI:s DRN� WATER MAIN — — — — — — Owlcr OMS ON OVERHEAD UTILITY STORM CATCH BASIN STORM MANHOLE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE O MANHOLE HYDRANT w GATE VALVE Do TI TELEVISION BOX ❑ TELEPHONE BOX ❑ UTILITY POLE RETAINING WALL FENCE 10' CONTOUR — — — 2' CONTOUR FEMA FLOOD PLAIN WETLAND LINE _oo.o_ SPOT ELEVATION -•a--- . ----c. E.I.F. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW x 4. 100.1, SILT FENCE • • . • . • - TREEFENCE - GRADING LIMITS - TREELINE iYW� SOIL BORING 92 9 29 924 — 1 6 i 171 3 923 167i g26 170 g3ag 9z e 168 169 g2g8 \ 9 O 833 929.8 929.E g30 w0 g30.3 w V�� 3 930\ WO WO \ �s G g38. \ � a?Do 34J_ — — 34.7 s2g s w0 z9 15393 \ 15 2 929. ,\-PeG•�� 151 3'39 KEY CONIFEROUS DECIDUOUS DENOTES TREE TO BE SAVED DENOTES TREE TO X X �yBB/E��rREE,,MOVED 11OM REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT INFORMATION. 1 147 I ' 36.8`D R / J TRD 0 0 ii fl �� ° 31�� 121 ME ���X = �. Wo 10 g3 ' 14 3g3; 143 f�. MWD 3136 �M - • S x OR D / • • n • Q a H j / D 113 D 31 A ID / RD 3220 �—�Oo ° RD 3201 RD 319IR D 3,99 I I N BENCHMARK 0 25 50 1pp 1. MNDOr ce ,R, Monument N—d Paul MNDT Reset, OSID SlaVm No. 94600. D—IF. = 932.36 FT. M DOr Oe—Ue Monument Nametl Eagle. GSID Station No. 95067. Elew— = 932.39 T. (IN FEET) 150 1 149 172 0 �s 93a � G G / Q35 g (9 G 93a? G ,37 a Wo gg0 gg0 9 92g' 45 D 3132 / 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 1 herebycertifythat this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. Drawn: KRO ReV151On51 FEN WAY LAND COMPANY T3 (r� Carlson I Blaine, MN 55449 p r 2/a/19 per City Comments •environmental or report was prepared by me or under my RICE LAKE RESERVE engineering Phone:'763,489-7900 direct supervision and that lam Signature: a // Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota McCain www.Carlsonmccain.com the laws ofthe State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License#: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 T5 927.3 INSTALL SILT FENCE \ � AFTER GRADING IS ----COMPLETE _ 1 EXISTING LWOD EXISTING UTILITY POLE RETAINING WALL FENCE 10' CONTOUR — — 2' CONTOUR FEMA FLOOD PLAIN WETLAND LINE CG SPOT ELEVATION -••---- ----a- EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SILT FENCE TREE FENCE GRADING LIMITS TREELINE %1 SOIL BORING ( \l �J PROPOSED �00.0� E.O.F. 000.0 000000- GRAVEL CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE KEY INCONIFEROUS DECIDUOUS DENOTES TREE TO BE SAVED DENOTES TREE TO 2 BE REMOVED NOTE BENCHMARK REFER TO TREE INVENTORY REPORT FOR TREE 0 25 so 1pp 1. MNDOT —IN, Named P-I NNDT R—t, IDENTIFICATION AND REMOVAL/REPALCEMENT GSD ItaIm No, 9ae00. Dewtlon = 111- IT, INFORMATION. N DOT c ,U, uP�umr�t Named Ea91c. GsiD Station No. 95057. Demotion = 932.39 FT. (IN FEET) 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I herebycertifythat this Ian, specification Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. Drawn: KRO ReV151O"�' FEN WAY LAND COMPANY T4 / T)McCain Carlson I Blaine, MN 55449 p r 2/4/19 per City Comments•environmental or report was prepared by me or under my RICE LAKE RESERVEengineering Phone:'163,4119-7900 direct supervision and thatIamadulySignature:a// Designed: BJK13925 Fenway Boulevard North TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota www.Carlsonmccain.com the lawsoftheStateofMinnesota Date: 10/22/19 License#: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 T5 TAGq I SPECIES DBH(ln.)j COMMENTS SAVE REMOVE 1701 Poplar 20 X 1702 Poplar X 1703 Poplar 7 X 1704 Poplar 14 X 1705 Ash 10 X 1706 Poplar 12 X 1707 Poplar 10 X 1708 Poplar 10 X 1709 Poplar 11 X 1710 Poplar 7 X 1711 Poplar 9 X 1712 Poplar 8 X 1713 Poplar 9 X 1714 Poplar 7 X 1715 Ash 16 X 1716 Ash 10 x 1717 Ash 10 x 1718 Ash 12 X 1719 Ash 14 X 1720 Pa er Birch 18 X 1722 Ash 18 X 1723 Elm 9 X 1724 Ash 12 X 1725 Ash 16 x 1726 Ash 18 x 1727 Elm 10 X 1728 Elm 10 X 1729 Ash 18 X 1731 Ash 22 X 1732 Ash 8 X 1733 Ash 6 X 1734 Poplar 10 X 1735 Poplar 8 X 1736 Poplar 16 X 1737 Poplar X 1738 Poplar 9 Dead X 1739 Poplar 7 X 1740 Poplar 14 X 1741 Ash 12 X 1742 Paper Birch 19 X 1743 Ash 6 X 1744 Ash 10 X 1745 Ash 6 X 1746 Paper Birch 8 X 1747 Poplar 10 X 1748 Poplar 8 X 1749 Poplar 10 Dead X 1750 Poplar 8 X 1751 Poplar 8 X 1752 Poplar 7 X 1753 Poplar 10 X 1754 Poplar 9 X 1755 Paper Birch 15 X 1756 Poplar 7 X 1757 Poplar 8 X 1758 Poplar 30 X 1759 Poplar 8 X 1760 Paper Birch 16 x 1761 Ash 12 X 1762 Elm 8 x 1763 Ash 7 X 1764 Ash 8 X 1765 Ash 6 X 1766 Poplar 8 X 1767 Poplar 8 X 1768 Poplar 8 x 1769 Poplar 8 X 1770 Poplar 8 X 1771 Poplar 8 X 1772 Poplar 6 X 1773 Poplar 18 X 1774 Poplar 9 X 1775 Poplar 7 X 1776 Poplar 10 X 1777 Poplar 8 x 1778 Poplar 12 X 1779 Poplar 10 x 1780 Ash 6 X 1781 Ash 16 X 1782 Ash 8 x 1783 Ash 6 X 1784 Ash 7 X 1785 Ash 12 X 1786 Ash 10 X 1787 Ash 10 X 1788 Ash 30 X 1789 Ash 8 X 1790 As 10 x 1791 Ash 8 X TAGq I SPECIES jDBH(ln.)j COMMENTS SAVE REMOVE 1792 Ash 10 x 1793 Ash 8 x 1794 Ash 30 x 1795 Ash 9 X 1796 Ash 22 X 1798 Ash 10 X 1799 Ash 14 X 1800 Ash 8 X 1801 Ash 18 x 1802 Ash 14 X 1803 Ash 7 X 1804 Ash 8 X 1805 Ash 10 X 1806 Ash 10 X 1807 Ash 14 X 1808 Ash 8 x 1809 Ash 6 x 1810 Ash 16 X 1811 Poplar 8 X 1812 Ash 9 X 1813 Ash 6 X 1814 Poplar 11 X 1815 Poplar 8 X 1816 Elm 10 X 1817 Poplar 14 X 1818 Poplar 8 X 1819 Poplar 10 X 1820 Ash 20 X 1821 Ash 9 X 1822 Ash 22 X 1823 Ash 12 X 1824 Ash 24 X 1825 Ash 13 X 1826 Ash 6 X 1827 Poplar 14 X 1828 Poplar 8 X 1829 Ash 8 X 1830 Poplar 8 X 1831 Poplar 8 X 1832 Poplar 7 X 1833 Poplar 6 X 1834 Poplar 6 X 1835 Poplar 18 X 1836 Paper Birch 8 X 1837 Poplar 11 X 1838 Ash 7 X 1839 Poplar 10 X 1840 Poplar 7 X 1841 Ash 7 X 1842 Ash 7 X 1843 Poplar 7 X 1844 Poplar 6 X 1845 Poplar 9 X 1846 Poplar 8 X 1847 Poplar 6 X 1848 Poplar 7 X 1849 Ash 9 X 1850 Poplar 7 X 1851 Ash 8 X 1852 Elm 10 X 1853 Ash 6 X 1854 Ash 24 X 1855 Pa er Birch 6 X 1856 Poplar 8 X 1857 Poplar 12 X 1858 Ash 30 X 1859 Poplar 7 X 1860 Poplar 7 x 1861 Poplar 7 X 1862 Ash 7 X 1863 Ash 8 X 1864 Ash 9 X 1865 Ash 8 X 1866 Poplar 6 X 1867 Ash 12 X 1868 Ash 8 X 1869 Poplar 10 X Poplar 10 X Poplar 6 X Poplar 12 X V1874 Ash 12 X Poplar 7 X Po lar 7 X Po lar 14 x Poplar 6 X 1878 Poplar 30 X 1879 Spruce 13 X 1880 Red Pine 11 X 1881 Red Pine 9 X TAGq I SPECIES jDBH(ln.)j COMMENTS SAVE REMOVE 1882 Red Pine 10 X 1883 Red Pine 10 X 1884 Red Pine 9 X 1885 Red Pine 10 x 1886 Red Pine 9 X 1887 Red Pine 10 X 1888 Red Pine 8 X 1889 Red Pine 10 X 1890 Red Pine 9 x 1891 Red Pine 10 X 1892 Red Pine 10 X 1893 Red Pine 10 X 1894 Red Pine 8 X 1895 Ash 10 X 1896 Poplar 12 X 1897 Red Pine 10 X 1898 Red Pine 10 x 1899 Red Pine 10 X 1900 Red Pine 13 X 1901 Red Pine 10 X 1902 Red Pine 10 X 1903 Red Pine 9 X 1904 Red Pine 12 X 1905 Red Pine 12 X 1906 Red Pine 10 X 1907 Red Pine 11 X 1908 Red Pine 11 X 1909 Red Pine 9 X 1910 Red Pine 12 X 1911 Red Pine 10 X 1912 Red Pine 11 X 1913 Red Pine 11 X 1914 Red Pine 11 X 1915 Red Pine 8 X 1916 Red Pine 9 X 1917 Red Pine 8 X 1918 Red Pine 8 X 1919 Red Pine 8 X 1920 Red Pine 10 X 1921 Red Pine 9 X 1922 Red Pine 12 X 1923 Red Pine 11 X 1924 Red Pine 12 X 1925 Red Pine 14 X 1926 Red Pine 13 X 1927 Red Pine 10 X 1928 Red Pine 12 X 1929 Red Pine 11 X 1930 Red Pine 11 X 1931 Maple 24 X 1932 Red Pine 11 X 1933 Red Pine 11 X 1934 Red Pine 12 X 1935 Red Pine 12 X 1936 Red Pine 12 X 1937 Red Pine 11 X 1938 Red Pine 9 X 1939 Red Pine 11 X 1940 Spruce 8 X 1941 Red Pine 12 X 1942 Red Pine 30 X 1943 Red Pine 10 X 1944 Red Pine 10 X 1945 Red Pine 9 X 1946 Red Pine 12 X 1947 Red Pine 12 X 1948 Red Pine 6 X 1949 Fir 11 X 1950 Red Pine 12 X 1951 Red Pine 10 X 1952 Red Pine 11 X 1953 Red Pine 11 X 1954 Red Pine 11 X 1955 Red Pine 30 X 1956 Red Pine 12 X 1957 Red Pine 6 X 1958 Red Pine 6 X 1959 Red Pine 11 x 1960 Red Pine 9 X 1961 Red Pine 11 x 1962 Red Pine 10 X 1963 Red Pine 30 X 1964 Red Pine 12 X 1965 Ash 6 X 1966 Red Pine 12 X 1967 Ash 8 X 1968 Ash 10 X 1969 Ash 10 X 1970 Ash 6 X TAG H SPECIES DBH (In.) COMMENTS SAVE REMOVE 1971 Ash 6 X 1972 Ash 7 X 1973 Ash 9 X 1974 Ash 10 X 1975 Ash 13 X 1976 Elm 15 X 1977 Ash 15 X 1978 Ash 14 X 1979 Ash 14 X 1980 White Pine 15 X 1981 White Pine 8 X 1982 White Pine 7 X 1983 White Pine 6 X 1984 White Pine 14 X 1985 White Pine 10 X 1986 White Pine 6 X 1987 White Pine 6 x 1988 White Pine 12 X 1989 White Pine 10 X 1990 White Pine 14 X 1991 White Pine 7 X 1992 White Pine 7 X 1993 White Pine 8 X 1994 White Pine 16 X 1995 White Pine 16 X 1996 Crababpple 13 X 1997 Spruce 13 X 1998 Honey Locust 21 X 1999 Ash 24 X 2000 Ash 17 X 3001 Maple 24 X 3002 Ash 63 X 3003 River Birch 19 X 3004 Spruce 16 X 3005 Maple 13 X 3006 Maple 16 X 3007 Oak 20 X 3008 Spruce 12 X 3009 Spruce 14 X 3010 Spruce 7 X 3011 Spruce 10 X 3012 Spruce 10 X 3013 Spruce 8 X 3014 Spruce 11 X 3015 Spruce 9 X 3016 Spruce 8 X 3017 Spruce 9 X 3018 Spruce 8 X 3019 Spruce 8 X 3020 Spruce 12 X 3021 Spruce 8 X 3022 Spruce 7 X 3024 Spruce 12 X 3025 Spruce 8 X 3026 Spruce 9 X 3027 Red Pine 30 X 3028 Red Pine 8 X 3029 Spruce 7 X 3030 Red Pine 9 X 3031 Red Pine 9 X 3032 Red Pine 8 X 3033 Spruce 7 X 3034 Spruce 8 X 3035 Spruce 8 X 3036 Spruce 7 X 3037 Red Pine 12 X 3038 Red Pine 12 X 3039 Red Pine 8 X 3040 Red Pine 10 X 3041 Red Pine 9 X 3042 Spruce 7 X 3043 Spruce 9 X 3044 Spruce 8 X 3045 Spruce 10 X 3046 Spruce 8 X 3047 Red Pine 9 X 3048 Spruce 7 X 3049 Red Pine 7 X 3050 Spruce 9 X 3051 Red Pine 8 X 3052 Spruce 8 X 3053 Red Pine 30 X 3054 Spruce 8 X 3055 Spruce 10 X 3056 Red Pine 9 X 3057 Red Pine 8 X 3058 Spruce 10 X 3059 Red Pine 9 X 3060 Red Pine 9 X TAG p I SPECIES DBH(ln.)j COMMENTS SAVE REMOVE 3061 Spruce 8 X 3062 Red Pine 9 X 3063 Spruce 8 X 3064 Red Pine 9 X 3065 Spruce 9 X 3066 Red Pine 9 X 3067 Spruce 6 X 3068 Red Pine 9 X 3069 Spruce 8 X 3070 Red Pine 7 X 3071 Spruce 8 X 3072 Red Pine 9 X 3073 Spruce 9 X 3074 Red Pine 9 X 3075 Spruce 6 X 3076 Red Pine 8 X 3077 Spruce 8 X 3078 Red Pine 8 X 3079 Spruce 12 X 3080 Red Pine 9 X 3081 Spruce 6 X 3082 Red Pine 7 X 3083 Spruce 7 X 3084 Red Pine 9 X 3085 Spruce 12 X 3086 Red Pine 10 X 3087 Spruce 7 X 3088 Spruce 6 X 3089 Red Pine 12 X 3090 Spruce 11 X 3091 Red Pine 9 X 3092 Spruce 7 X 3093 Red Pine 8 X 3094 Spruce 8 X 3095 Red Pine 10 X 3096 Spruce 7 X 3097 Red Pine 12 X 3098 Spruce 11 X 3099 Spruce 11 X 3100 Red Pine 10 X 3101 Spruce 8 X 3102 Spruce 7 X 3103 Red Pine 8 X 3104 Spruce 10 X 3105 Red Pine 9 X 3106 Spruce 6 X 3107 Spruce 12 X 3109 Red Pine 13 X 3109 Spruce 15 X 3110 Spruce 16 X 3111 Poplar 9 X 3112 Poplar 8 X 3113 Poplar 12 X 3114 Poplar 10 X 9 X 7 X 11 X E 7 X MPoplar 8 X 7 X 6 X 3122 6 X 3123 Poplar 6 X 3124 Poplar 6 X 3125 Black Locust 11 X 3126 Poplar 5 X 3127 Poplar 7 X 3128 Poplar 12 X 3129 Poplar 7 X 3130 Poplar 6 X 3131 Poplar 5 X 3132 Ash 6 X 3133 Ash 6 X 3134 Ash 6 X 3135 Ash 7 x 3136 Ash 6 X 3137 Ash 6 X 3138 Ash 6 x 3139 Red Pine 7 X 3140 Red Pine 8 X 3141 Red Pine 11 X 3142 Spruce 12 X 3143 Spruce 6 X 3144 Spruce 10 X 3145 Spruce 8 X 3146 Spruce 7 x 3147 Spruce 8 X 3148 Spruce 6 x 3149 Spruce 12 X TAGp I SPECIES DBH(ln.)j COMMENTS SAVE REMOVE 3150 Spruce 12 X 3151 Spruce 8 X 3152 Spruce 6 X 3153 Spruce 8 X 3154 Spruce s X 3155 Spruce 9 x 3156 Spruce 8 X 3157 Spruce 9 X 3158 Spruce 10 X 3159 Spruce 12 X 3160 Ash 13 X 3161 Poplar 11 X 3162 Red Pine 12 Offsite X 3163 Red Pine 9 Offsite x 3164 Red Pine 9 Offsite X 3165 Poplar 28 Offsite X 3166 Spruce 7 Offsite X 3167 Spruce 7 Offsite X 3168 Spruce 12 Offsite X 3169 Willow 56 Offsite X 3170 Spruce 21 Offsite x 3171 Red Pine 12 Offsite x 3172 Red Pine 13 Offsite X 3173 Spruce 6 Offsite x 3174 Spruce 20 Offsite X 3175 Spruce 22 Offsite X 3176 Spruce 28 Offsite X 3177 Spruce 27 Offsite X 3178 Spruce 14 X 3179 Spruce 12 Offsite X 3180 Poplar 6 X 3181 Poplar 7 X 3182 Poplar 6 X 3183 Poplar 6 X 3184 Poplar 6 X 3185 Scotch Pine 30 X 3186 White Pine 6 X 3187 Poplar 8 X 3188 Poplar 8 Offsite X 3189 Poplar 6 X 3190 Poplar 10 Offsite X 3191 Poplar 10 X 3192 Poplar 9 X 3193 8 X 3194 Ash 8 x 3195 Ash 12 X 3196 Ash 7 x 3197 Ash 8 X 3198 Ash 9 X 3199 Basswood 12 X 3200 Ash 12 X 3201 Ash 8 x 3202 Ash 13 x 3203 Ash 6 X 3204 Hickory 14 X 3205 Hickory 10 x 3206 Ash 7 X 3207 Hickory 9 X 3209 Red Oak 6 X 3209 Ash 30 x 3210 Ash 7 x 3211 Ash 7 X 3212 Ash 6 x 3213 Ash 6 X 3214 Poplar 25 X 3215 Ash 7 x 3216 Hickory 10 x 3217 Ash 6 x 3218 Ash 13 X 3219 Ash 6 X 3220 Ash 31 x 3221 Ash 21 X 3222 Spruce 30 Offsite X 3223 Spruce 11 Offsite x 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 100 I hereb certif that this Ian, s ecincation Print Name: Brian J. Krystofak, P.E. Drawn: KRO ReV151On,,' FE N WAY LAND COMPANY D / Carlson Blaine, MN 55449 y y p p 1. 12/4/19 per City Comments •environmental or report was prepared by me or under my P y RICE LAKE RESERVE I :engineering Phone: (763)489-7900 direct supervision and thatIamaduly Signature: Designed: BJK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 Licensed Professional Engineer under Hugo, Minnesota C In www.carlsonmccam.com the lawsoftheStateofMinnesota Dale: SO/22/19 License#: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 T5 MONUMENT SIGN LOCATION i ti GRAVEL 1 CONSTRUCTION 1 F ENTRANCE WO - q VF FVq _ 7 N UTLOT B 1 \ � 1 1 0 10 - + (\ I G BH 3 WO 1 I I 1 I 100��(WETLAND r VR HWL = 9263 s\ I / \ > OUTLOT C < CE i 4! 0 3 .! 1 � a I 111111111111111111111111111111CITY OF HUGO LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS ��> \ r Sec. 90-181. - Landscaping. OUTLOT A \ � -- = WETLAND (a) Single-family housing. All yard areas are to be covered with an approved ground cover. Two oversto deciduous shade trees shall be maintained in thefront and o olHw - s2zs ry f Y f each home site. Where five or more trees are planted os part of a development, no -STREET LIGHT (TYP) WHYTH SOD (TYP) BL \ \ more than 20 percent of the trees planted to meet this requirement shall be of the same species. Ir101 rlo 103 I 104 I I r I 106 I / T _ W _ I 107 WO I 8 /11071 ✓�I, HL W -F / 0 10\/`- Iz 1 110�/`� • L112 IT- Wo I iI ,� •, J c +W H - � + ++ k + W_ 1 � WD \ yVp}I� -+.:1i I I I I I I I I --+ -w+0 / / { 1 .+ + ++�� ,.. `-\ tIL++ + •++ \ � H �+ � I / W r C � O \ Fi;f _ - --da I+'Nq- 8J L 187 -11$.IPI.I \._I _ yW0 I/ Ii -I-.++ +, �, 1 �+-aiiuniry - --J L- j Wp+++++ G r • / / 11\`w '+sf+ a1 �- G 1' 0 n* - J I c 1 / / / L - _ W - , J+-+ IFS++I+ _ / 1, ti "I 2 OUTL T C A 1 0 a Ad 1 \ //POND NWL = 924.5 \ + r- --- - -----J 100 YR HWL = 92T3 + ! •r------1 Y PLANTING NOTES 1. MINIMUM ONE (1) ADDITIONAL DECIDUOUS CANOPY TREE SHALL BE PROVIDED BV BUILDER ON EACH LOT. 2. ALL PLANTING STOCK SHALL CONFORM TO THE "AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK" ANSI-Z60 LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN, INC. AND SHALL CONSTITUTE MINIMUM QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR PLANT MATERIALS. 3. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REJECT ANY PLANTS WHICH ARE DEEMED UNSATISFACTORY BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER INSTALLATION. 4. NO SUBSTITUTIONS OF PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. 5. EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN SHALL BE PROTECTED TO THE DRIP LINE FROM ALL CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, STORAGE OF MATERIALS ETC. WITH 4' HT. ORANGE PLASTIC SAFETY FENCING ADEQUATELY SUPPORTED BY STEEL FENCE POSTS 6' O.C. MAXIMUM SPACING. 6. ALL PLANT MATERIAL QUANTITIES, SHAPES OF BEDS AND LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLETE COVERAGE OF ALL PLANTING BEDS AT SPACING SHOWN AND ADJUSTED TO CONFORM TO THE EXACT CONDITIONS OF THE SITE. THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT SHALL APPROVE THE STAKING LOCATION OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. 7. ALL PLANTING AREAS MUST BE COMPLETELY MULCHED AS SPECIFIED. 8. MULCH: SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH, CLEAN AND FREE OF NOXIOUS WEEDS OR OTHER DELETERIOUS MATERIAL, IN ALL MASS PLANTING BEDS AND FOR TREES, UNLESS INDICATED AS ROCK MULCH ON DRAWINGS. SUBMIT SAMPLE TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO DELIVERY ON -SITE FOR APPROVAL. DELIVER MULCH ON DAY OF INSTALLATION. USE 4" FOR SHRUB BEDS, AND 3" FOR PERENNIAL/GROUND COVER BEDS, UNLESS OTHERWISE DIRECTED. 9. PLACE LANDSCAPE FILTER FABRIC UNDER ALL MULCHED AREAS. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE 100% INTERWOVEN 5.1oz NEEDLE PUNCHED POLYPROPYLENE FABRIC MANUFACTURED BY DEWITT. USE PRO 5 "WEED BARRIER• OR APPROVED EQUAL. 10. PLACE EDGING BETWEEN ALL PLANTING/ROCK BEDS AND TURF. EDGING SHALL BE POLY. 11. THE PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND IF DISCREPANCIES EXIST. THE SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER THE PLANTING NOTES AND GENERAL NOTES. 12. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL MULCHES AND PLANTING SOIL QUANTITIES TO COMPLETE THE WORK SHOWN ON THE PLAN. VERIFY ALL QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE LANDSCAPE LEGEND. 13. LONG-TERM STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR SUPPLIES ON -SITE WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL KEEP PAVEMENTS, PLANTERS AND BUILDINGS CLEAN NOT MAINTAINED IN THIS MANNER WILL BE REJECTED. ANY DAMAGE TO EXISTING FACILITIES SHALL BE REPAVED AT THE CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 15. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES, REGULATIONS, AND PERMITS GOVERNING THE WORK. 16. LOCATE AND VERIFY ALL UTILITIES, INCLUDING IRRIGATION LINES, WITH THE OWNER FOR PROPRIETARY UTILITIES AND GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 454-0002 (TWIN CITIES METRO AREA) OR 800-252-1166 (GREATER MINNESOTA) 48 HOURS BEFORE DIGGING. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE PROTECTION AND REPAIR OF ANY DAMAGES TO SAME. NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF ANY CONFLICTS TO FACILITATE PLANT RELOCATION. 17. USE ANTI -DESICCANT (WILTPRUF OR APPROVED EQUAL) ON DECIDUOUS PLANTS MOVED IN LEAF AND FOR EVERGREENS MOVED ANYTIME. APPLY AS PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTION. ALL EVERGREENS SHALL BE SPRAYED IN THE LATE FALL FOR WINTER PROTECTION DURING WARRANTY PERIOD. 18. PLANTING SOIL FOR TREES, SHRUBS AND GROUND COVERS: FERTILE FRIABLE LOAM CONTAINING A LIBERAL AMOUNT OF HUMUS AND CAPABLE OF SUSTAINING VIGOROUS PLANT GROWTH. IT SHALL COMPLY WITH MN/DOT SPECIFICATION 3877 TYPE B SELECT TOPSOIL. MIXTURE SHALL BE FREE FROM HARDPACK SUBSOIL STONES CHEMICALS NOXIOUS WEEDS ETC. SOIL MIXTURE SHALL HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.1 AND 7.5 AND 10-0-10 FERTILIZER AT THE RATE OF 3 POUNDS PER CUBIC YARD. IN PLANTING BEDS INCORPORATE THIS MIXTURE THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BED BY ROTOTILLING IT INTO THE TOP 12" OF SOIL. 19. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED FOR TWO COMPLETE GROWING SEASON (APRIL 1 - NOVEMBER 1) UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED. THE GUARANTEE SHALL COVER THE FULL COST OF REPLACEMENT INCLUDING LABOR AND PLANTS. 20. CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 3 DAYS PRIOR TO PLANNED DELIVERY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AT LEAST 24 HOURS IN ADVANCE OF BEGINNING PLANT INSTALLATION. 21. SEASONS/TIME OF PLANTING AND SEEDING: NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR MAY ELECT TO PLANT IN OFF-SEASONS ENTIRELY AT HIS/HER RISK. DECIDUOUS POTTED PLANTS: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21 - 11/1 DECIDUOUS /B&B: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21 - 11/1 EVERGREEN POTTED PLANTS: 4/1 - 6/1; 9/21-11 /1 EVERGREEN B&B: 4/1 - 5/1; 9/21 TURF/LAWN SEEDING: 4/1 - 6/1; 7/20 - 9/20 NATIVE MIX SEEDING: 4/1 - 7/20; 9/20-10/20 22. MAINTENANCE SHALL BEGIN IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH PORTION OF THE WORK IS IN PLACE. PLANT MATERIAL SHALL BE PROTECTED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL THE INSTALLATION OF THE PLANTS IS COMPLETE, INSPECTION HAS BEEN MADE, AND PLANTINGS ARE ACCEPTED EXCLUSIVE OF THE GUARANTEE. MAINTENANCE SHALL INCLUDE WATERING, CULTIVATING, MULCHING, REMOVAL OF DEAD MATERIALS, RE -SETTING PLANTS TO PROPER GRADE AND KEEPING PLANTS IN A PLUMB POSITION. AFTER ACCEPTANCE, THE OWNER SHALL ASSUME MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITIES. HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTINUE TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR KEEPING THE TREES PLUMB THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 23. ANY PLANT MATERIAL WHICH DIES, TURNS BROWN, OR DEFOLIATES (PRIOR TO TOTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE WORK) SHALL BE PROMPTLY REMOVED FROM THE SITE AND REPLACED WITH MATERIAL OF THE SAME SPECIES, QUANTITY, AND SIZE AND MEETING ALL LANDSCAPE LEGEND SPECIFICATIONS. 24. WATERING: MAINTAIN A WATERING SCHEDULE WHICH WILL THOROUGHLY WATER ALL PLANTS ONCE A WEEK. IN EXTREMELY HOT, DRY WEATHER, WATER MORE OFTEN AS REQUIRED BY INDICATIONS OF HEAT STRESS SUCH AS WILTING LEAVES. CHECK MOISTURE UNDER MULCH PRIOR TO WATERING TO DETERMINE NEED. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAKE THE NECESSARY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WATER. 25. CONTRACTOR SHALL REQUEST IN WRITING A FINAL ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION. 26. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO BE TURF SEEDED, ARE TO RECEIVE 4" TOP SOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. 27. ALL DISTURBED AREAS TO RECEIVE NATIVE WETLAND SEEDED, ARE TO RECEIVE ENGINEERED SOIL, SEED, MULCH, AND WATER UNTIL A HEALTHY STAND OF GRASS IS OBTAINED. EASMNT 0 a 1 I 174 t 1 2 M RHL � BL _I''il - 1• L_ " __ _ J 10 STREET B �O - o' / v 173 �� 164/ // \ 1 5 Iul �._ H\a I A A� - .+-+� i rr^. I '�A 12 �a V� PLAN 20 \�O - -_ //� �-p �• � � +�- e' 2-PLY NYLON STRAPS - / / + 169 0 +++ 0 G 'I) G G c 1 0 DOUBLE STRAND 12 GAUGE WIRE / 167/.. SO / 0 - V A - g0 III EXISTING RonowA N4 TREE WRAP V -�.�F' A A\ w I +• ' ++++ +pG A i + ++- -- o EAS�ENT PAINTED FLUORESCENT ORANGE \ �'� / w / 1 I +I 1 68 V V A V A' A =� �+ �\ 2i d 136-� 32 131 12IQ WHITE FLAGGING (TT'P.) � c \ W H 0 \ + �- 9aa- - + -_ _+ 0 l l 4 INCHES HARDWOOD MULCH �158 / 3 / " � � 1 G 1 � n +,+ + ��. \ ��� + � \ 135 L 1 +•+ � � - 7-' .'gyp 9 EEL TEED O�` +r 'CREED O + c V A W� 1 1 _ - � s++++ ++++ + + ++ + - 12 +� - ++ +_ ' \ t ,..i_ ++_ A w V A V A I _ �8 O + 4 INCH DEEP SAUCER t1 _ .Z S" biEEL TEE POST- BACKFILLMIx } / O �� � 0 A A V 139 ++++H UNDISTURBED SUBSOIL RM j+1- 1 15� // �+ - + - STREET LIGHT TYP. _ REMOVE BURLAP 4 ROPE FROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALL 7 NOTE: SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE. 14\+`i115_ WATER ELEVATION i925.5. (SHOT5/2019) ��'I /1_.�- WD WD WD V A A +�_+145\ DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL 153 /// / d I L� No o scMs 152 / -1-1_ 46� 15 / +� it 150 149 I 1 48 47- 1 I. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE \ J L - - J L - L NOTE ourr ASSEMBLY OPTIONAL BUT PRIOR TO PLANTING _ _ - '� WQ 2. TRIM OUT DEAD WOOD AND WEAK AND/OR DEFORMED TWIGS, DO NOT CUT A LEADER, DO CONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULL REINFOR MAINTAINING TREE IN A PLUMB PONTION FOR THE \. 5 NOT PAINT CUTS. DURATION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIOD 3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOL GUY ASSEMBLY- Ib• OR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED BACKFlLL SOL POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT OR (40 MID 1-1/2` WIDE STRAP (TYP) UP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE. DOUBLE STRAND 1 a GA WIRE, 2-1" ROLLED STEEL POSTS (MNDOT 346D 4. PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITH b ISO' O.C. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM) BURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, OF USED), INTACT. BACKFlLL WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THE COORDINATE TOP OF ROOTBALL, WATER PLANT. REMOVE STAKING TO INSURE TOP 1/3 12 UNIFORM OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWO ORIENTATION OF GUY HORIZONTAL RINGS, WHICHEVER IS GREATE 12 NES AND STAKES REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM TOP I/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE. STAKING DIAGRAM S. PWMBAND BACKFlLL WITH BACKFlLL SOL GUY WIRE WITH WEBBING b. WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILL FLAGGING- ONE PER WIRE VODS. 4"-b" SHREDDED BARK 1. WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OF INStlLLLATION WATERING MUST BE FNLCH (-EWSTING GRADE SUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SATURATE i MINIMUM 1/2 WIDTH OF ROOT BALL ROOT BALL AND PLANTING HOLE. E. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 46 HOURS OF Y PLANTING SOL MMURE (SEE SPEC.) THE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOIL iUNDISTURBED OR STABILIZED MOISTURE 15 EXCES&VE. a SUBSOIL *_CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL. ,ar T4 2. _ 142 \ A 143 \ -- _ 4 WDTH Soo (TYP. 3 UTLOT C L-i l - u � � u) 12 PLANT SCHEDULE TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER RM 30 Acer rubrum'Northwood' Northwood Red Maple 2.5" Cal. B&B HL 21 Gleditsia triacanthos inermis ' Harve' Northern Acclaim Thornless Honey Locust 2.5" Cal. B&B 0 WO 18 Quercus bicolor Swamp White Oak 2.5" Cal. B&B OBL 38 This americans 'Boulevard' Boulevard Linden 2.5" Cal. B&B CONIFEROUS TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER sW"a BH 5 Picea glauca densata Black Hills Spruce 6' Hit. B&B OR VEL CONSTRUCTION ^� ��-- ENTRANCE / N ORNAMENTAL TREES CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER SB 3 Amelanchierxgrandiflora'Autumn Brilliance' Clump Form, 1.5" Cal Equivalent Autumn Brilliance Serviceberry 7'Ht. B&B GROUND COVERS CODE QTY BOTANICAL NAME COMMON NAME SIZE CONTAINER - _ I- I -I -I -I -I -I -I -I -I -I SOD 57,457 sf Turf Sod Bluegrass Kentucky Bluegrass sod TI 909,079 sf Type I - Low Maint. Turf Seed MnDOT Seed Mix 25-131 seed Refer to notes for acceptable seeding methods + Seeding Rate 330 Ib/ac 0 40 80 160 TII 73,727 sf Type II - Stormwater Seed Mix MnDOT Seed Mix 33-261 seed w w Refer to notes for acceptable seeding W W W methods (IN FEET) Seeding Rate 52.0 Ib/ac 3891 Pheasant Ridge Drive NE, Suite 1110 MN 55449 1 hereb rti that this Ian, s fication Print Name: Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA y ce y p peci report was prepared by me or under my Drawn: FUR ReV1510nsi 1 2/4/19 per City Comments.•nvironmentalBlaine, FENWAY LAND COMPANY RICE LAKE RESERVEPRELIMINARY L1 �)Carlsqn McCain Ior • engineering 'surveying Phone: (763) 489-7900 Fax; (763)489-7959 direct supervision and that 1 am a duly Signature:- Licensed Lands cape Architect under Date: 10/2Z/19 License *: 56346 Designed: RIR Date: 10/22/19 13925 Fenway Boulevard North Hugo, Minnesota 55038 g Hugo, Minnesota LANDSCAPE PLAN Of 1 sa•<oar<. rzroans cNut:+soot-eozo�eols-no"am<.��d r�dv<"d:wo<�soss-1<"ds. ww. carlsonmccain.com F 11. d., the laws of the State of Minnesota •�.. o�,c VICINITY MAP II RICE LAKE RESERVE N H KP Pµ 0 Ja III HUGO, MINNESOTA II R RICE y LAKE II II A'a EGG 90 LAKE I a III I OUTLOT A 3 1 N01 SITE AI'E.A 2 3 4 5 6 -� 7 8 111 10 „ 12 NOT TO SCALE — — — — — — — — I I \ S7]2EfT C , 4 15 I 2 1s 17 ----------- —� I 1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 18 I SUMMARY III L_WIN PHASE 1 43 LOTS 12 13 19 PHASE II 25 LOTS 2 14 I I I PHASE III 25 LOTS 15 �' II 17 2O 16 I I 93 LOTS I OUTLOT C fo i/ I � 21 I � 1 OUTLOT C 1 I I 22 i 1 1 1 s NOTE: 15 14 2 23 1 1.1 PHASING BJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO T MARKET ONDITIONS 0 4 1J 16 E TEMP ARY CUL-DE-SACS SACS SHALL B LL L1 ED AS REQUIRED AT PHASE 3 24 14 M TS — ° �� 17 �� J 1 9 5 4 �1 e 11 12 13 s 9 10 15 1 \ \ 18 OFF 8 7 S 7 8 T 6 F- I \ 19 20 6 4 5 4 W Ill it 21 3 4 �, II 41� OUTLOT C 22 32 1 2 23 30 31 24 ``\ 1 i' 25 28 29 26 27 OUTLOT 1 � O I 37V STREET N__ a / CALL BEFORE YOU DIG 4Q EGGL 5P 1 I • I % / �° 0 50 too 200 (IN FEET) BENCHMARK ow Wars below. a� m nt N< CaI I before you dig. i PP GSID MR S G— N. M< a t— Poul MNDT R< t. GSID Station No. 94800. Elevation = 932.38 FT. 2. MNDOT Ge -e Monumen e, Station No. 95087. Elewtion — 932.39 a EagleFT. GSID The subsurface utility information shown on this plan is utility Quality Level D. This quality level w s determined ....,ding to the guidelines of Cl/ASCE 38-02, entitled "Standard Guideline for the Collection and Depiction of Existing Subsurface Utility 0ato." 3890 Pheasant Ride Drive NE, Suite 100evisions: (� Carlson D g I hereby ce tiry that this plan, specification Print Name: Brian ]. Krystafiak, P.E.PEDrawn: KRO 12/4/19 Revised Trail and Sidewalk Layout, and Addition of Lots F E N WAY LAND COMPANY mental Blaine, MN 55449 direct report wa supervision and tby me hat I am a doer my RICE LAKE RESERVE • I •engineering Phone:'763)489-7900 direct supervision and that)amaduly Signature: Designed: 8JK 13925 Fenway Boulevard North PHASING PLAN Of •surveying Fax: (763)489-7959 LicensedProfessionalEngineerunder Hugo, Minnesota McCain ww carlsonmccain.com the laws of the State of Minnesota Date: 10/22/19 License #: 25063 Date: 10/22/19 Hugo, Minnesota 55038 1 N 0 100 200 400 ( SCALE IN FEET ) 0, Z 0) = WO)� O• y Lr, M L U) 0 y Zoz^ LL VVWcm� �No^ w a2 � Im 2 W C0 L a ~ W Ca � = W m X U) o LU W V' Q W c Z Y2: J J rn W � w W = O u 2 Zy Q `o azm g o 0 O;Ln U v m Q o ,°n Z m aJ c J 3 Qli o rn 3 N = Z M LL REVISIONS 1. 06/05/19 Add Ghost Plat. 2. 07/12/19 Revise layout. 3. 10/22/19 per Revised Layout. 4. 5. 6. DRAWN By: C# ISSUE DATE: 0/21119 FILE NO: I888 t 1 of 1 City of Hugo Fire Department t.onual Banq%fmfzor.�' When: Saturday January I81h Social Hour.. (cash bar)5 :00 pm Dinner ... ... ... ... ... .... 6:00 pm Words from Chief .... 7:00 pm Casino game ... ... ..... 8:00 pm Where: Hugo American Legion 5383 140th St N Hugo, MN 55038 RSVP with payment ($20 per person) by January IOth Council Meeting Calendar January 2020 January 2020 February 2020 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 2 3 4 1 s 6 7 8 9 10 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 26 27 28 29 30 31 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Dec 29 30 31 Jan 1, 20 2 3 4 New Year's Day (United States 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 7:00 m Council Meets 7:00 m Plannin Comm 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 7:00 m Parks Comm 19 20 21 S:OOom EDA 6:30om Hist. Comm. 22 23 24 25 Martin Luther King Day United States 7 m Planning mm 26 28 29 30 31 Feb (6:00pmGoal Setting (Hugo Council Chambers) - Hugo City Council S:OOpm Burger Night (Legion) Meetings in green are scheduled/posted meetings 1/2/2020 9:59 AM Council Meeting Calendar February 2020 February 2020 March 2020 Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 29 30 31 SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY Jan 26 27 28 29 30 31 Feb 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 7:00 m Council Meets 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 6:30 m BOZA Valentine's Day (United 7:00pm Planning Comm 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 Presidents' Day (United States m EDA 7 m Parksmm m Hist, Comm. 7:00pm Council Meets Needs Canceled or Rescheduled 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 5:00pm Burger Night (Legion) m B ZA 7:00pm Planningmm Meetings in green are scheduled/posted meetings 1/2/2020 9:59 AM