HomeMy WebLinkAbout2020.08.03 CC Packet
Meeting will be held remotely pursuant to MN Statute Sec. 13D.021. Anyone who wishes to
speak at the meeting is strongly encouraged to make arrangements by 4:30 p.m. on the
meeting day by contacting City Clerk Michele Lindau at 651-762-6315.For more information
on the remote meeting and participation, go to https://www.ci.hugo.mn.us/participate.
Meeting ID # 845 8658 9285
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL
C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. July 20, 2020, Council Meeting
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Update on COVID-19 City Response
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council
and will be enacted by one motion and a roll call vote. If a member of the City Council or
the public wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
will be considered separately.
1. Approve Claims Roster
2. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Mechanic Dave Greeder
3. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Director Scott Anderson
4. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Lead Worker Mike Loeffler
5. Approve Automatic Aid/Mutual Aid Agreement with Lino Lakes
Agenda
HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
HUGO CITY HALL
MONDAY, AUGUST 3, 2020 – 7 P.M.
H. PUBLIC HEARING
1. None Scheduled
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. None Scheduled
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Approve Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. None Scheduled
L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Update on Yellow Ribbon Network
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Reschedule September 7, 2020, Council Meeting to September 8, 2020
N. ADJOURNMENT
BACKGROUND MEMO FOR THE HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON AUGUST 3, 2020
D.1 Approval of Minutes for the July 20, 2020, Council Meeting
Staff recommends Council approve of the minutes for the July 20, 2020, City Council meeting as
presented.
F.1 Update on COVID-19 City Response
City Administrator Bryan Bear will provide an update on how the City is responding to the
coronavirus pandemic and request the Council approve the Budget for the CARES Act.
G.1 Approve Claims Roster
Staff recommends Council approve the Claims Roster as presented.
G.2 Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Mechanic Dave Greeder
Dave Greeder was hired by the City of Hugo as the mechanic in the Public Works Department
on August 8, 2005. Public Works Director Scott Anderson recommends Council approve the
annual performance review for Public Works Mechanic Dave Greeder.
G.3 Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Director Scott Anderson
Scott Anderson was hired by the City of Hugo on August 11, 2003 as a Senior Engineering
Technician, and on August 5, 2008, Scott was promoted as the City’s Public Works Director.
City Administrator Bryan Bear recommends Council approve the annual performance review for
Public Works Director Scott Anderson.
G.4 Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Lead Worker Mike Loeffler
Mike Loeffler was hired as a Maintenance Worker for the City of Hugo’s Public Works
Department on August 5, 2002. On October 17, 2011, Mike was promoted to be the Public
Works Lead Worker. Public Works Director Scott Anderson recommends Council approve the
annual performance review for Public Works Lead Worker Mike Loeffler.
G.5 Approve Automatic Aid/Mutual Aid Agreement with Lino Lakes
The Hugo Fire Department is requesting approval from Council to enter into an Automatic Aid
Agreement with Lino Lakes for use of fire personnel and equipment. This agreement would
authorize the joint and cooperative exercise of powers between the fire departments. Staff
recommends Council approve the Automatic Aid/Mutual Aid Agreement between the cities of
Hugo and Lino Lakes for the dispatch and use of fire personnel and equipment.
J.1 Approve Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan
The Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) describes and tracks a system of
regional volume reduction projects (primarily runoff reuse for irrigation) that generate volume
reduction credits, The City of Hugo intends to use these credits in lieu of stormwater Best
Management Practices (BMPs) on select roadway and redevelopment projects. RCWD rules
allow stormwater management projects to be implemented off-site of a development or road
improvement project, as long as they are in the same Resources of Concern drainage area. The
City of Hugo can develop and implement regional projects and apply the water quality credits
generated by the projects to future roadway improvements or land development activities.
Projects that have already been implemented are included in this document. These generated
credits will offset the initial capital cost of these water reuse projects by decreasing the
stormwater management costs of future roadway improvement projects. The City can also sell
these credits to a developer where onsite stormwater Best Management Practices have difficulty
being met onsite. Staff recommends approval of the resolution approving the City of Hugo
Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan.
L.1 Update on Yellow Ribbon Network
Council Member Chuck Haas and Phil Klein will report to Council on the Yellow Ribbon
Network activities held recently.
M.1 Reschedule the September 7, 2020 City Council Meeting to Tuesday, September 8, 2020
Each year, the Hugo City Council has to reschedule its first meeting in September due to the Labor
Day Federal Holiday. City staff recommends Council reschedule their regular Council meeting on
Monday, September 7th to Tuesday, September 8th due to the Labor Day Holiday.
N. Adjournment
Meeting held remotely pursuant to MN Statute Sec. 13D.021.
ZOOM Meeting ID # 841 1131 4644
Acting Mayor Petryk called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
COUNCIL PRESENT REMOTELY: Haas, Miron, Petryk
COUNCIL ABSENT: Klein, Weidt
OTHERS PRESENT REMOTELY: City Attorney Dave Snyder, City Engineer Mark Erichson,
Community Development Director Rachel Juba, Finance Director Ron Otkin, Planner Kendra
Lindahl
PRESENT AT CITY HALL: City Administrator Bryan Bear, City Clerk Michele Lindau
Approval of Minutes for the July 6, 2020 City Council Meeting
Miron made motion, Haas seconded, to approve the minutes for the City Council meeting held
on July 6, 2020, as presented.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
Approval of Agenda
Petryk made motion, Haas seconded, to approve the agenda as presented.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
Presentation of 2019 Audit Report – Jason Miller, Smith Schafer & Associates
Jason Miller from the independent accounting firm of Smith Schafer & Associates presented to
the Council a recap of the audit of City finances for the 2019 fiscal year. He talked about how
they came about their opinion on the financial statement and the procedures they perform in an
audit. They issued an unmodified opinion, which is the highest given, meaning they didn’t find
any misstatements. There are seven areas they test and found one minor exception in the legal
requirement regarding outstanding checks that will need to be reported to the state. Miller
reviewed governmental fund revenues stating most revenue comes from property taxes. He next
reviewed governmental fund expenditures stating general government, public safety, and
highways and street expenditures make up almost 90% of expenditures. He reviewed general
fund reserves saying it has been the City’s policy to reserve 50% of the following year’s
budgeted expenditures, and the City has exceeded that. He highlighted the importance of having
those reserves. He talked about debt service requirements stating there was one more year of
large debt payments, and then it dropped significantly. Capital projects expenditures included
major projects such as Adelaide Landing Park, electronic equipment upgrades in City Hall,
purchase of an aerial truck and plow truck, and street projects including 130th Street. He provided
information on enterprise funds that showed positive income. He summarized by saying the
information is on the website and a summary of the financial information was published in the
City’s official newspaper. Miller and the Council thanked staff for their work.
Minutes
HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
REMOTE MEETING
MONDAY, JULY 20, 2020 – 7 P.M.
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for July 20, 2020
Page 2 of 6
Hass made motion, Miron seconded, to formally accept the 2019 City Audit as recommended by
Finance Director Ron Otkin.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
Update on COVID-19 City Response
City Administrator Bryan Bear provided an update on how the City was responding to the corona
virus pandemic. He stated the City was operating under the Executive Order 20-74 from early
June saying not much has changed. He reviewed the City’s Covid-19 Preparedness Plan and
talked about how the State of Emergency is allowing the Council and other committees to meet
remotely. Special rules would apply if they would like to meet in person.
Bear provided information on the CARES Act stating Hugo’s share was $1,148,713.to spend on
corona related expense, and it needed to be spent by November 15. The City was documenting
expenses and the City Clerk would be contacting Council members to see if they had video
conferencing needs. Staff was in process of enhancing the equipment in the Council Chamber to
allow for blended meetings, meetings where some attended in person and some remotely. Staff
also was investigating installing ionized filters to improve air quality. Election expenses would
also be recoverable as well as staff time. Business grants would be discussed after preparing the
draft Covid budget for the Council to consider at their August 1, 2020, meeting.
Haas talked about the need to provide CARES Act money to local businesses, and he wondered
if money could be used to move in the direction of a full time fire employees. He asked staff to
look into those items and report back.
Miron talked about waiting until the technology was available before doing blended meetings.
He also questioned how businesses were operating under the “new normal”. Bear talked about
other layers of government that are providing tremendous support including Washington County,
who had committed money for small businesses. Miron asked that staff get feedback from local
businesses to see if there was an additional need.
Council agreed to continue to meet remotely and discuss it further at their next meeting.
Consent Agenda
Haas made motion, Miron seconded, to approve the following consent agenda:
1. Approve Claims Roster
2. Approve Change Order No. 2 from CB&I for the Water Tower No. 4 Improvement
Project
3. Approve Pay Voucher No. 11 from CB&I for Water Tower No. 4 Improvement Project
4. Approve Pay Vouch No. 3 from Peterson Companies, Inc. for Water’s Edge Stormwater
Reuse – Phase 2
5. Approve Resolution Terminating TIF District No. 1-2 and Directing County to Decertify
6. Approve Reduction in Letter of Credit for Adelaide Landing 5th Addition
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for July 20, 2020
Page 3 of 6
7. Approve Board of Trustees Request for Increase in Lump-Sum Pension Approval of
Increase in Fire Relief Pension
8. Adopt Feasibility Study for Lions Park Improvement Project
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
Approve Claims Roster
Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Claims Roster as presented.
Approve Change Order No. 2 from CB&I for the Water Tower No. 4 Improvement Project
WSB recommended approval of Change Order No. 2 for work done by CB&I on the Water
Tower No. 4 project. This change order eliminated the water tower’s seepage pit as it is no
longer needed based on conditions at the water tower site. Change Order No. 2 also reduced the
length of the 18”RCP needed by 25 feet. The associated total reduction in contract price was
$5,500. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Change Order No. 2 for work done by
CB&I.
Approve Pay Voucher No. 11 from CB&I for Water Tower No. 4 Improvement Project
CB&I, LLC has submitted Pay Voucher No. 11 for work done on the Water Tower No. 4
Improvement Project certified through July 2, 2020. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved
Pay Voucher No.11 in the amount of $49,780.00.
Approve Pay Vouch No.3 from Peterson Companies, Inc. for Water’s Edge Stormwater
Reuse – Phase 2
Peterson Companies, Inc. had submitted Pay Voucher No. 3 for work done on the
Water’s Edge Stormwater Reuse -Phase 2 project certified through June 30, 2020. Adoption of
the Consent Agenda approved Pay Voucher No. 3 in the amount of $196,332.47.
Approve Resolution Terminating TIF District No. 1-2 and Directing County to Decertify
The City’s downtown tax increment district was certified by the county in 2010. Through 2019
this district had not generated any tax increment and there is no outstanding debt or contractual
obligations. Minnesota statutes required that this district be decertified. Adoption of the
Consent Agenda approved RESOLUTION 2020-32 RELATING TO THE TERMINATION OF
TAX INCREMENT DISTRICT NO. 1-2 AND DIRECTING DECERTIFICATION THEREOF
BY THE COUNTY AUDITOR.
Approve Reduction in Letter of Credit for Adelaide Landing 5th Addition
Adelaide Landing 5th Addition has had significant work completed to date, and the Excelsior
Group requested a reduction in the letter of credit. The current letter of credit for the 5th Addition
was in the amount of $3,032,318. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the reduction in the
letter of credit to $2,192,740 based on the value of work remaining to be completed.
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for July 20, 2020
Page 4 of 6
Approve Board of Trustees Request for Increase in Lump-Sum Pension
The Board of Trustees for the Hugo Firefighter’s Relief Association had formally requested City
Council ratification of an increase of $100 per year of service in their lump-sum pension
benefit. The Finance Department had reviewed this request and found it to be financially
feasible and consistent with the Pension Fiscal Policy adopted in April, 2012. Adoption of the
Consent Agenda approved the ratifying the Board of Trustees’ request for a $100 increase in
their lump-sum pension benefit and corresponding change to their by-laws.
Adopt Feasibility Study for Lions Park Improvement Project
At the City Council meeting of April 20, 2020, a feasibility study of Lions Park was
authorized. A master plan for Lions Park was approved on March 2, 2015. The feasibility study
revised the master plan for consistency with anticipated residential development and road
projects adjacent to the park. A joint Parks Commission and City Council workshop was held on
June 29, 2020 to review the updated master plan options and cost estimates. At their July 15,
2020 meeting, the Parks Commission recommended approval of the final master plan and
feasibility study for Lions Park. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the final master plan
and feasibility study for Lions Park.
Resolutions Approving Hugo Gardens Preliminary Plat and PUD Amendment
Garden Apartments, LLC, had requested approval for a Planned Unit Development (PUD)
amendment and preliminary plat for “Hugo Garden Apartments,” to allow construction of 84
apartment units in seven buildings to be located on the west side of Finale Avenue, south of 147th
Street. Planner Kendra Lindahl from Landform explained the number of apartments was reduced
from the original PUD approved in 2014, which included the construction of 165 units in three
buildings on the site as part of the LaValle Fields plat. The revised plan included a mix of one,
two, and three bedroom units for rent. The property was part of LaValle Fields PUD, and Outlot
B would be platted as a single lot to accommodate the new apartments. Outlot D will be used for
ponding.
Apartments are required to comply with the City’s multi-family design guidelines, and Lindahl
reviewed the proposed elevations saying staff felt they were well designed and did a nice job of
meeting these guidelines. The development was also subject to the Downtown Plan & Design
Guidelines that are intended to create pedestrian friendly neighborhoods. They worked to
orientate the buildings to Finale Avenue. To accomplish that, the developer was requesting a
reduction in the front yard setback from 30 feet to 10 feet. Lindahl talked about the landscape
plan and the grading and drainage plan saying they would be working with the developer on a
cost share agreement for storm water reuse. An access easement would need to be acquired from
the senior housing development to the south in order to comply with fire department and
emergency vehicle needs. The developer would be responsible to improve Finale Avenue as a
32 foot wide street to allow for on-street parking and construction of an 8-foot trail on the east
side of the street. Staff was still working with the developer to finalize the plans. Park
dedication would be in cash in the amount of $87,414.72. There was green space in the project
but no private amenities. Lions Park could provide the recreational needs. She stated the plat
complied with ordinance requirements, and if the preliminary plat was approved, the next steps
would be approval of the final plat, development agreement and an easement vacation.
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for July 20, 2020
Page 5 of 6
Lindahl provided background of the May 14, 2020, Planning Commission meeting where a
public hearing was held on the applications. During the public hearing, a resident came forward
and shared concerns about the apartments being within close proximity to the road. The
Commissioners generally liked the proposal and agreed the products would be a nice addition to
the community. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the resolutions approving
the PUD Amendment and Preliminary Plat for “Hugo Garden Apartments.”
Mark Margulies with Valerian, LLC, thanked staff for the work they had done on this
complicated project. He explained the incomplete items and conditions are known to them, and
they have no objections to staff recommendations. He said they were working on access
agreements from the adjoining landowner, and he believed they would be in place at time of final
plat. He talked about recreational amenities and clarified they would be relying heavily on Lions
Park, but there was an opportunity to make use of their green space and possibly use one of the
buildings for an indoor gathering space or workout area. He talked about property management
explaining it would mostly function as townhomes that require physical maintenance but not
hands on management. He explained there would be a good connection with residents.
Architect Dean Dovolis, added that every unit had individual entries, no corridors, and attached
garages. He said it would make a nice transition from the downtown area with two story
buildings that outline the park.
Miron made motion, Haas seconded, to approve RESOLUTION 2020-33 APPROVING A
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT FOR “HUGO GARDEN
APARTMENTS” (PID 20-031-21-23-0058 AND19-031-21-11-0087)
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
Miron made motion, Haas seconded, to approve RESOLUTION 2020-34 APPROVING A
PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR “HUGO GARDENS” (PID 20-031-21-23-0058)
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
Resolution Authorizing Preparation of Feasibility Study for 2021 Road Project
City Engineer Mark Erichson talked about the previously approved “Hugo Gardens Apartment”
and how the developer would be responsible for improvement to Finale Avenue. He explained
the remaining streets are identified in the City’s 5-year Capital Improvement Plan for roadway
infrastructure, which was approved at the July 6th City Council meeting as part of the City’s
overall 5-year Capital Improvement Plan. Next year’s improvement project was identified as the
2021 Downtown Improvement Project and included the extension of 147th Street from Finale
Avenue to Oneka Boulevard, reconstruction of 147th Street from just west of TH 61 to Finale
Avenue, Flay Avenue north of 147th Street, Upper 146th Street, 146th Street, Finley Avenue, and
Fitzgerald Avenue. Coordinating with the Lions Park Improvement efforts, CR 8 Water Reuse
Project, and Hugo Gardens was important, and moving forward with the preparation of the
feasibility study would be helpful and he recommended approval of the preparation of the
feasibility study.
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for July 20, 2020
Page 6 of 6
Haas made motion, Miron seconded, to approve RESOLUTION 2020-35 ORDERING
PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO ALL
OR PORTIONS OF ROADWAYS IDENTIFIED AS THE 2021 DOWNTOWN
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
Update on Yellow Ribbon Network
Council Member Chuck Haas and Phil Klein reported to Council on the Yellow Ribbon Network
activities held recently. Haas showed a photo of a letter from the MN National Guard thanking
the Yellow Ribbon for supporting the soldiers during the recent civil strike by providing lunches
for 700-800 soldiers. He showed a picture of a mini donut truck owned by realtor Mark
Schwope explaining that Mark had been donating a portion of his business proceeds and donut
proceeds to the YRN. There were thank you pictures for care packages and donations of 3M
Command Hooks and coffee. The YRN helped clean gutters on a soldier’s home, and a crew
went to the City of Stacy to help someone move.
Schedule Mid-Year Budget Workshop for Week of September 14-18
City Administrator Bryan Bear recommended Council schedule the midyear budget workshop for
some time during the week of September 14-18.
Miron made motion, Haas seconded, to schedule the Midyear Budget Workshop for Tuesday,
September 15, 2020, at 4 p.m.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
Adjournment
Klein made motion, Haas seconded, to adjourn at 7:55 p.m.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
Respectfully Submitted,
Michele Lindau
City Clerk
�,CITY OF HUGO 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North, Hugo, MN55038 • (651) 762-6300 • www.ci.hugo.mn.us
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
DATE:
EST.1906
Honorable Mayor Tom Weidt and Members of the City Council
Ron Otkin, Finance Director
Approve Coronavirus Relief Fund Supplemental Budget
For the City Council Meeting of August 3, 2020
DESIRED COUNCIL ACTION
Approve Resolution Adopting CARES Funding Budget.
BACKGROUND
The Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (CARES Act) was created because of the sudden decline in
economic output following the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak that significantly altered the fiscal
outlook for state and local governments. The CARES Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020 and created the
Coronavirus Relief Fund (Fund), which provided $150 billion in direct assistance for domestic governments and
stipulated that $139 billion be allocated to state governments based on their populations.
The CARES Act details eligible purposes for which Coronavirus Relief Fund payments may be used. It allows local
governments to make payments for programs that (1) are necessary expenditures incurred due to the public health
emergency with respect to COVID-19; (2) were not accounted for in the budget most recently approved as of the date
of enactment; and (3) were incurred during the period that begins on March 1, 2020 and ends November 15, 2020. The
Department of the Treasury has released guidance and extensive fact sheets which sets forth their interpretation of
these limitations on the permissible use of the Funds.
The Minnesota Legislature failed to pass bill SF 47 that would distribute the Coronavirus Relief Funds to local units of
governments before adjourning their special session. However, on June 25, 2020 Governor Walz announced that he
would distribute $841 million in federal funds to cities, counties, and townships for coronavirus related expenses
through the Legislative Advisory Commission (LAC) process defined in state law. Under the plan, cities with populations
of 200 or more would be eligible to receive a distribution from the Minnesota Department of Revenue of $75.34 per
capita. On June 29, 2020 the City of Hugo submitted the Coronavirus Relief Fund Certification Form to the Minnesota
Department of Revenue certifying our intent to comply with the eligible use parameters outlined in the CARES Act and
requesting distribution of the City's portion of the Coronavirus Relief Funds. On July 7, 2020 the City of Hugo received
$1,148,713.00 in Coronavirus Relief Funds from the Department of Revenue. The City of Hugo has until November 15,
2020 to spend the funds. Any unspent funds must be returned to Washington County for reuse on eligible pandemic
costs.
The Finance Department has spent time researching the issued guidance and fact sheets and using that information has
assembled a proposed supplemental budget that meets the criteria set forth and establishes disbursements of the
Coronavirus Relief Funds. Staff has budgeted for the reimbursement of expenditures made to manage the pandemic
and modifications made at City buildings to allow business to continue safely for Council Members, Commissioners,
employees, and the public.
COVID-19 SMALL BUSINESS RESOURCES Updated April 6, 2020 Program Agency Eligibility Amount Interest Collateral Requirements Terms Deferral Period Forgivable? Use of Funds Other/Notes SBA Economic Injury Disaster Loan Small Business Administration Small business or non-profit Up to $2M 3.75%-business 2.75% non-profit Security Interest in Business Property Up to 30 years Up to 12 months No, except for $10,000 loan advance Fixed debt, payroll, accounts payable, etc. that could have been paid if COVID-19 had not happened. Apply to SBA directly - Up to 3 to 4 weeks to process application - Apply online - $10,000 cash advance (maximum) - List of supporting financial documents requested - Approval can be based on credit score - Personal Guarantees for loans over $200k - Apply at: https://covid19relief.sba.gov/ SBA Paycheck Protection Program Small Business Administration Small business or non-profit Up to $10M 1% No 2 years Up to 6 months Yes (for expenses 8 weeks after getting the loan) Payroll, Interest on Mortgage, Rent, Utilities. Apply through a SBA approved lender. - Up to 1 to 2 weeks to process application - Apply through an SBA-Approved Lander - Loan based on 2.5x average monthly payroll - Smoother application process - No Personal Guaranty - Minnesota SBA Approved Lender Small Business Emergency Loan Program Minnesota Department of Employment & Economic Development Small business effected by Minnesota EO 20-04 and 20-08 that have been operational for at least one year $2500 to $35,000 0% Be willing to provide collateral or personal guarantee up to 20% Up to 5 years Up to 6 months Partial forgiveness may be available Funds are available for working capital -Apply through a non-profit lender (available on DEED’s website) -Must also apply for SBA Economic Injury Disaster Loan assistance at the same time -Are unable to qualify for a loan from a bank or credit union. -Must be current on financial obligations as of March 1, 2020. Apply at: MN DEED Fund Technical Assistance Open to Business Metropolitan Consortium of Community Developers Current and perspective entrepreneurs Free advising and technical assistance on business issues and lending options Open to Business Website Tyler Hilsabeck thilsabeck@mccdmn.org (612) 789-8838 Small Business Development Center Small Business Development Center Small businesses or perspective Free advising on pre-venture, start-up or established business services Unemployment and Other Programs Shared Work Program Department of Employment and Economic Development Minnesota businesses Workers work reduced hours, and the workers are paid unemployment benefits to offset part of their reduced wages. Helps businesses and employees avoid a layoff while keeping trained staff and increases operations more quickly when conditions improve. Unemployment Insurance Department of Employment and Economic Development Workers unemployed due to COVID-19 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Unemployed workers should apply online using the schedule set out according to social security number. The waiting period has been waived. UI tax rate for businesses will not increase if workers collect unemployment benefits
EMERGENCY FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR SMALL BUSINESSES, STARTUPS,
AND NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS
Program Type Program Name
Self-employed
entrepreneur
Small business
and startups
Venture
capital-backed
startup Nonprofit Details
Where do
I apply?Contact Information
Federal grant/
loan
SBA Economic Injury
Disaster Loan (EIDL)
and Emergency Grant
Yes Yes * Maybe Yes
Loans Up to $2 million with first
payment deferred for 12 months
Emergency Grant of $1,000 per
employee up to $10,000
* SBA affiliation rule may preclude
some VC-backed startups from
qualifying.
Directly with the
Small Business
Administration
Website: sba.gov/disaster
Email: disastercustomerservice@sba.gov
Phone: 1-800-659-2955
(TTY: 1-800-877-8339)
Federal grant/
loan
SBA Paycheck Protection
Program (PPP)Yes Yes * Maybe Yes
Forgivable loans up 2.5x monthly
payroll or $10 million. Loans are
forgivable for certain operational
expenses paid for in the first
8-weeks after taking out the loan.
* SBA affiliation rule may preclude
some VC-backed startups from
qualifying.
With a local
particpating
lender.
Website: sba.gov/funding-programs/loans/
coronavirus-relief-options/paycheck-pro-
tection-program-ppp
Federal tax
program
IRS Employee
Retention Credit Yes Yes Yes Yes Program cannot be used if you are
receiving a PPP loan.
Directly with
the IRS
Website: irs.gov/coronavirus-tax-re-
lief-and-economic-impact-payments
Federal tax
program
IRS Delay of Payment
of Employer Payroll Taxes Yes Yes Yes Yes Program cannot be used if you are
receiving a PPP loan.
Directly with
the IRS
Website: irs.gov/coronavirus-tax-re-
lief-and-economic-impact-payments
Unemployment
Insurance
Pandemic Unemployment
Assistance (PUA) Program Yes Maybe Maybe Yes
Recipient must qualify as a self-
employed business owner whose
primary source of income is the
business they directly operate.
With the state
UI office.Website: uimn.org
State loan
Minnesota Small Business
Loan Guarantee (SBLG)
Program
Ye s Ye s Yes No
80% loan guarantee for loans up
to $250,000 made by a qualified
economic development lender.
For business with fewer than
250 employees.
With a local
particpating
lender
Website: mn.gov/deed/business/financing-
business/deed-programs/peacetime/
sbel-lenders.jsp
State loan
Minnesota Small
Business Emergency
Loan (SBEL) Program
Yes, for businesses
affected by
Executive Orders
20-04 and 20-08
Yes, for businesses
affected by
Executive Orders
20-04 and 20-08
Yes, for businesses
affected by
Executive Orders
20-04 and 20-08
No
Zero interest loans up to $35,000
through approved lenders to meet
expenses.
With a local
particpating
lender
Wesbite: mn.gov/deed/business/financing-
business/deed-programs/loan-guarantee/
enrolled-lenders.jsp
State Grant
Minnesota Peacetime
Emergency Child
Care Grants
Yes, for child care
providers that
remain open.
Yes, for child care
providers that
remain open.
Yes, for child care
providers that
remain open.
Yes, for child care
providers that
remain open.
For child care providers that
remain open for the duration
of the declared peacetime
emergency.
With Childcare
Aware Minnesota
Wesbite: childcareawaremn.org/providers/
emergency-child-care-grants
Email: EmergencyGrants@childcarea-
waremn.org
Phone: 651-290-9704
1
AUTOMATIC AID/MUTUAL AID AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITIES OF HUGO and LINO LAKES FOR THE DISPATCH AND
USE OF FIRE PERSONNEL AND EQUIPMENT
This Automatic Aid Agreement for use of fire personnel and equipment (“Agreement”) is
made and entered into and effective this day of , 2020,
by and among the City of Hugo, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Hugo”) and the City of Lino
Lakes, a Minnesota municipal corporation (“Lino Lakes”) pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota
Statutes §471.59 which authorizes the joint and cooperative exercise of powers common to the
contracting parties. Subject to the terms and conditions hereafter stated and based on the
representations, agreements and recitals of the parties herein contained, the parties do hereby agree
as follows:
ARTICLE I
DEFINITIONS
1.1 Terms. The following terms, unless elsewhere specifically defined herein, shall have the
following meanings as set forth below.
1.2 “Party or Parties”. The City of Hugo and the City of Lino Lakes. Parties shall
collectively mean more than one Party.
1.3 “Requesting Official”. The person designated by a Party who is responsible for
requesting Assistance from the other Party.
1.4 “Requesting Party”. A Party that requests assistance the other Party, or in the case of
the provision of Automatic Aid, the City where the building/structure fire is located.
1.5 “Responding Official.” The person designated by a Party who is responsible to
determine whether and to what extent that Party should provide Assistance to a
Requesting Party.
1.6 “Responding Party.” A Party that provides assistance to a Requesting Party.
1.7 “Assistance.” Fire/rescue and/or emergency medical services personnel and equipment.
1.8 “Automatic Aid.” A predetermined response as provided in this Agreement.
1.9 “Fire Protection Area.” The areas shown on the Automatic Mutual Aid Response Map
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
ARTICLE II
RECITALS
WHEREAS, the intent of this Agreement is to make fire equipment, personnel and other
resources available to the Parties to this Agreement to address fire emergencies; and
2
WHEREAS, the Parties to this Agreement desire to be properly prepared to manage and
extinguish fires and handle other emergencies; and
WHEREAS, in order to ensure adequate preparations to protect the lives and property
within the cities who are parties to this Agreement, the Parties desire to assist each other.
NOW THEREFORE, the Parties mutually agree to the joint exercise of police powers by
initiating a policy of Automatic Aid with the following conditions:
Section 1. Automatic Assistance. If any Party receives notice of a reported
structure or building fire within the Party’s designated Fire Protection Area, the Party will
automatically dispatch assistance to the scene of the building or structure fire without first
receiving a request from a Requesting Official for assistance. The Responding Party may send any
available Fire Department resources to respond to the building or structure fire, in the discretion
of the Responding Official, based on the Responding Party’s resource availability.
Section 2. Recall of Assistance. The Parties reserve the right to retain equipment,
personnel and supplies that may be necessary to protect their own Cities. If an emergency arises
within the Responding Party’s Fire Department coverage area, the Responding Official may at any
time recall such assistance when in his or her best judgment, or by an order from the governing
body of the Responding Party, it is considered to be in the best interest of the Responding Party to
do so.
Section 3. Command of the Scene. The first Party arriving at the scene of the
structure or building fire shall establish command of the scene. Command of the scene may be
transferred by agreement of all parties at the scene.
Section 4. Workers’ Compensation and Responsibility for Injuries. Each Party
shall be responsible for injuries or death of its own personnel. Each Party will maintain workers’
compensation insurance or self-insurance coverage covering its own personnel while they are
providing assistance pursuant to this agreement. Each Party waives the right to sue any other Party
for any workers’ compensation benefits paid to its own employees or volunteers or their
dependents, even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other
Party or its officers, employees, or volunteers.
Section 5. Damage to Equipment. Each Party shall be responsible for damages to or
loss of its own equipment and supplies. Each Party waives the right to sue any other Party for any
damages to or loss of its equipment or supplies, even if the damages or losses were caused wholly
or partially by the negligence of any other Party or its officers, employees, or volunteers.
Section 6. Minnesota Municipal Tort Liability Act. For the purposes of the
Minnesota Municipal Tort Liability Act (Minn. Stat. 466), the employees, volunteers, and officers
of the Responding Party are deemed to be employees (as defined in Minn. Stat. 466.01, subdivision
6) of the Requesting Party, but compensated by the Responding Party.
3
Section 7. Indemnification. The Requesting Party agrees to defend and indemnify
the Responding Party against any claims brought or actions filed against the Responding Party or
any officer, employee, or volunteer of the Responding Party for injury to, death of, or damage to
the property of any third person or persons, arising from the performance and provision of
Assistance in responding automatically to a building/structure fire or responding to a request for
Assistance by the Requesting Party pursuant to this Agreement.
Under no circumstances, however, shall a Party be required to pay on behalf of itself and
other Parties, any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 466 applicable to any one Party. The limits of liability for some or all of the Parties may
not be added together to determine the maximum amount of liability for any Party. The intent of
this Section is to impose on the Requesting Party limited duty to defend and indemnify a
Responding Party for claims arising within the Requesting Party’s jurisdiction subject to the limits
of liability under Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466. The purpose of creating this duty to defend
and indemnify is to simplify the defense of claims by eliminating conflicts among defendants, and
to permit liability claims against multiple defendants from a single occurrence to be defended by
a single attorney.
No Party to this Agreement or any officer of any Party shall be liable to any other Party or
to any other person for failure of any Party to furnish Assistance to any other Party, or for recalling
Assistance, both as described in this Agreement.
Section 8. Charges. No charges will be levied by the Responding Party to this
Agreement for Assistance rendered to the Requesting Party under the terms of this Agreement
unless that Assistance continues for a period of more than 12 hours.
a. If Assistance provided under this agreement continues for more than 12
hours, the Responding Party may submit to the Requesting Party an
itemized bill for the cost of any Assistance provided after the initial 12
hour period, including salaries, overtime, materials and supplies and other
necessary expenses at the rates established in the most recent Suggested
Equipment Standards and Hourly Rates for Fire Departments That Have
an Agreement with the Division of Forestry/MN/DNR; and the Requesting
Party shall reimburse the Responding Party providing the Assistance for
that amount.
b. Such charges are not contingent upon the availability of federal or state
government funds.
Section 9. Term. This Agreement shall commence on the date executed and shall
continue until terminated. Any Party may withdraw from this Agreement upon thirty (30) days
written notice to the other Party to the Agreement.
Section 10. Amendments. Any amendments to this Agreement shall be in writing and
signed by all Parties.
4
Section 11. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts, any one
of which shall be deemed an original, but when taken together shall constitute one Agreement.
Section 12. Binding Agreement. This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to
the benefit of the Parties and their permitted assigns, and nothing in this Agreement, express or
implied, is intended to confer any rights or remedies upon any other persons.
Section 13. Entire Agreement. This Agreement contains the entire Agreement of the
Parties and all representations with respect to Automatic Aid, and supersedes and all prior
agreements, correspondence, or memoranda, but does not replace or modify any existing
mutual/automatic aid agreements between the Parties and other cities which are not a party to this
Agreement.
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]
5
CITY OF HUGO
By:
Tom Weidt
Its: Mayor
Attest: ______________________________
Michele Lindau
Its: City Clerk
Approved by the City Council of the City of Hugo
day of , 2020.
6
CITY OF LINO LAKES
By:
Its: Mayor
Attest: ______________________________
Its:
Approved by the City Council of the City of Lino Lakes
day of , 2018.
7
EXHIBIT A FIRE RESPONSE MAP
Hugo Fire responding to the following areas:
RRF1-C, RRF2-B, RRF2-E, RRF2-A, RRF2-C
Lino Lakes Fire responding to the following areas:
Hugo FD 1A
8
9
[The remainder of this page is intentionally left blank.]
S:\Administration\City Council\2020 City Council Meetings\Scans\2020.08.03\01904-610 Summary Hugo CSMP 20200716.docx 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum
To: Hugo City Council
Bryan Bear, City Administrator
Rachel Juba, Community Development Director
From: Mark Erichson, City Engineer
Kendra Fallon, EIT, WSB
Date: July 30, 2020
Re: Hugo Comprehensive Stormwater Management Summary
WSB Project No. 01904-610
The Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) describes and tracks a system of
regional volume reduction projects (primarily runoff reuse for irrigation) that generate volume
reduction credits, The City of Hugo intends to use these credits in lieu of stormwater Best
Management Practices (BMPs) on select roadway and redevelopment projects. RCWD rules
allow stormwater management projects to be implemented off-site of a development or road
improvement project, as long as they are in the same Resources of Concern drainage area.
The City will use these credits on linear or land development projects where physical constraints
do not allow for cost efficient BMP implementation to address volume reduction. Credits from
regional volume reduction projects that have been constructed are tracked and made available
only within the same Resources of Concern drainage area. The City of Hugo can develop and
implement regional projects and apply the water quality credits generated by the projects to future
roadway improvements or land development activities. Projects that have already been
implemented are included in this document. These generated credits will offset the initial capital
cost of these water reuse projects by decreasing the stormwater management costs of future
roadway improvement projects. The City can also sell these credits to a developer where onsite
stormwater Best Management Practices have difficulty being met onsite.
The City of Hugo is a leader in the State of Minnesota for water stewardship and conservation.
The City follows a “reduce, reuse and replenish” philosophy, which includes implementing
irrigation and infiltration systems that reduce runoff, improve water quality, and replenish
groundwater. By replenishing groundwater, Hugo’s regional stormwater reuse systems provide
benefits that extend beyond the City and watershed’s stormwater management requirements.
Proposed large-scale best management practices will allow the City of Hugo to reduce future
runoff volume creating significant benefit to the City, watershed, and the region.
COMPREHENSIVE
STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT PLAN
JULY 2020
Prepared for:
City of Hugo
14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North
Hugo, MN 55038
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-61
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CITY OF HUGO
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
For:
CITY OF HUGO
JULY 2020
Prepared By:
TABLE OF CONTENTS
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS
CITY OF HUGO
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610
Title Sheet
Table of Contents
INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1
CITY-WIDE VOLUME REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS: CREDIT DEMAND ................................. 2
A. Credit Valuation ................................................................................................................................ 2
B. Public Linear Projects ...................................................................................................................... 2
C. Development and Redevelopment Projects..................................................................................... 3
PROPOSED REGIONAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES: CREDIT SUPPLY ....................... 4
A. Credit Generation and Verification ................................................................................................... 4
1. Project Completion .............................................................................................................. 4
2. Additional Credits & Monitoring ........................................................................................... 4
B. Project Tracking Process ................................................................................................................. 4
C. Planned and Completed Projects .................................................................................................... 5
1. Oneka Ridge Golf Course ................................................................................................... 5
2. Beaver Ponds Park Irrigation Project .................................................................................. 5
3. Wilderness View Water Reuse Project ............................................................................... 5
4. Infiltrate and Irrigate Lions Park .......................................................................................... 6
5. Egg Lake Perimeter Stormwater Reuse System ................................................................ 6
6. Water’s Edge Water Reuse and Irrigation .......................................................................... 6
7. CSAH 8 City Accounts Irrigation project ............................................................................. 6
8. Irrigate Clearwater Creek Park ........................................................................................... 6
9. Irrigate Future Fable Hills Park ........................................................................................... 6
10. Arbre Park Irrigation Project ................................................................................................ 7
11. Val Jean Park Water Re-use Project .................................................................................. 7
12. Irrigate Public Property around Water’s Edge School ........................................................ 7
13. Heritage Pond Park Water Reuse System ......................................................................... 7
14. Oneka Ponds Park Water Reuse System ........................................................................... 7
15. Diamond Point Park Water Reuse System ......................................................................... 7
16. Rice Lake Soccer Fields Water Reuse System .................................................................. 7
17. Hugo Gravel Pit Infiltration System ..................................................................................... 7
18. Harley Sod Field Irrigation Project ...................................................................................... 7
19. Clearwater Cove Irrigation .................................................................................................. 8
20. Oneka Place Development Reuse System ......................................................................... 8
21. Adelaide Landing Development Reuse System ................................................................. 8
CONCLUSION ................................................................................................................................. 9
REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................... 10
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A – Figures
Appendix B – References
Appendix C – Sequencing Flow Chart
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CITY OF HUGO
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610 PAGE 1
INTRODUCTION
This Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan (CSMP) describes a system of regional volume
reduction projects (primarily runoff reuse for irrigation) that generate volume reduction credits, The City of
Hugo intends to use these credits in lieu of stormwater Best Management Practices (BMPs) on select
roadway and redevelopment projects. The City will use these credits on linear or land development
projects where physical constraints do not allow for cost efficient BMP implementation to address volume
reduction or where planned regional volume reduction practices have been constructed within the same
Resources of Concern (ROCs) drainage area. The City of Hugo can develop and implement regional
projects and apply the volume reduction credits generated by the projects to future roadway
improvements or land development activities.
RCWD rules allow stormwater management projects to be implemented off-site of a development or road
improvement project, as long as they are in the same ROC drainage area. This CSMP describes a
number of projects and the ROC drainage area in which they occur. The projects and their capacity
constitute the supply side of the credit system. The demand side of the credit system is the water quality
improvements needed for Hugo to implement its 2040 land use plan and roadway capital improvement
plan while wanting to maintain a regional approach to volume reduction. Implementing these plans will
result in an increase in impervious surface as development replaces agricultural land.
RCWD requires monitoring to verify the quantity of credits a project can generate. The City may conduct
more monitoring, if desired, to increase the amount of credits. The monitoring procedure is described in
this CSMP.
The City of Hugo is a leader in the State of Minnesota for water stewardship and conservation. The City
follows a “reduce, reuse and replenish” philosophy, which includes implementing irrigation and infiltration
systems that reduce runoff, improve water quality, and replenish groundwater. By replenishing
groundwater, Hugo’s regional stormwater reuse systems provide benefits that extend beyond the City and
watershed’s stormwater management requirements.
Proposed large-scale best management practices will allow the City of Hugo to reduce future runoff
volume creating significant benefit to the City, watershed, and the region.
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CITY OF HUGO
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610 PAGE 2
CITY-WIDE VOLUME REDUCTION REQUIREMENTS: CREDIT DEMAND
A. Credit Valuation
Using the City of Hugo’s 2040 planned land use and comparing it to 2005 land uses, the water
quality treatment volume required for a full-build out of Hugo is estimated using the RCWD’s Rule
C. Rule C states that 1.1 inch of volume reduction/water quality treatment is required for new or
reconstructed impervious areas for all development and redevelopment projects, with the
exception of Public Linear Projects. For Public Linear Projects, it is anticipated that Rule C will be
updated at the end of 2020 to state that 1.0 inch of volume reduction/water quality treatment is
required for new impervious areas greater than 10,000 square feet. To estimate the increase in
impervious area, a GIS analysis of existing versus future impervious area for each subwatershed
was conducted (Appendix A – Figures 1, 2, and 3).
Based on the Credit Valuation Guide in Appendix B, the City will distribute credits based on BMP
size requirements for the new or reconstructed impervious surface. The required BMP volume
must be calculated using RCWD’s Rule C.
0.0540
Development and redevelopment projects that are not city-funded public linear projects must pay
the City for use of volume credits. Based on average construction cost of a typical wet pond BMP
and land value cost in Hugo, each credit shall cost $18,050 (Appendix B). This value may be
reviewed and adjusted as costs fluctuate.
B. Public Linear Projects
Road improvement projects require stormwater management, though the required treatment
volume is less than land development projects. For public linear projects, it is anticipated that
Rule C will be updated at the end of 2020 to state that 1.0 inch of treatment must be provided for
new impervious surfaces greater than 10,000 square feet. The CSMP assumes the 1.0 inch for
public linear projects will be adopted by RCWD and applies that standard.
The annual reuse treatment volume required was calculated by assuming that the standards for
public and private development capture 19.87 inches and 20.38 inches of rainfall annually,
respectively. In other words, capturing 1.0 inch off of impervious for each rainfall event—as is
required for public linear projects—is comparable to using 19.87 inches of stormwater annually
over the same area. These values were provided by RCWD and dictate the amount of irrigation
required for stormwater reuse projects.
Based on the Credit Valuation Guide in Appendix B, one volume credit (one acre-foot of
irrigation annually) will sufficiently provide stormwater volume control for 0.615 acres of
impervious increase for public linear projects. It is anticipated that approximately 30,000 sf of new
impervious will be created annually from public linear projects, however that number will likely
fluctuate based on the City’s CIP needs.
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CITY OF HUGO
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610 PAGE 3
C. Development and Redevelopment Projects
The intent of the volume credits for development and redevelopment projects is to use credits
when site specific limitations are present and/or where regional reuse projects have been
constructed. Site specific limitations include but are not limited to: potential contamination,
physical limitations, and land use limitations (see Table 1). Based on the Credit Valuation Guide
in Appendix B, one volume credit (one acre-foot of irrigation annually) will sufficiently provide
stormwater volume control for 0.589 acres of impervious area for private development projects.
Development projects that purchase volume credits must still demonstrate compliance with all
other RCWD and City of Hugo rules, including rate control requirements. The applicant must
follow the City’s stormwater sequencing flow chart to determine if purchasing credits is an option
for the site (Appendix C). Priority will be placed on purchasing credits generated from a regional
reuse system downstream that intercepts the runoff volume leaving the project site prior to the
ROC and any other natural waters (ie, streams and wetlands). If that is not possible, then it will
need to be demonstrated that the runoff leaving the site will not cause negative water quality
impacts on any downstream natural waters and/or the ROC. This could be done through water
quality modeling.
Table 1: Potential Site Specific Limitations
Type Specific Project Site Conditions Required Submittals
Potential
Contamination
Potential Stormwater Hotspots (PSH) PSH Locations and Flow Paths
Contaminated Soils Documentation of Contamination
Soil Borings
Physical Limitations
Low Permeability Soils *HSG C & D) Soil Borings
Bedrock within three vertical feet of
bottom of infiltration area Soil Borings
Seasonal high water table within three
vertical feet of bottom of infiltration area
Soils Borings
High Water Table
Karst areas Soil Borings
Land Use Limitations Utility Locations Site Map
Nearby Wells (Private and/or Municipal) Well Locations
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CITY OF HUGO
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610 PAGE 4
PROPOSED REGIONAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES: CREDIT SUPPLY
A. Credit Generation and Verification
RCWD rules currently require that each BMP undergo three years of monitoring for credit
verification. Prior to the monitoring period, an irrigation rate of 0.5 inches per week over the 26-
week growing season may be credited. Additional water quality treatment capacity beyond the 0.5
inches per week may be recognized based on a three-year average of monitoring records of
volume irrigated. This document allows the City to receive credit for the projects in this report as
well as any future projects under the following monitoring schedule.
1. Project Completion
Upon substantial completion (project construction completion, the irrigation surface has
been graded, and seeding placed and the irrigation system is functional), the City will
receive all allowable credits. The City may then use the credits towards public or private
developments as it sees fit. The credits received at this time are irrevocable.
2. Additional Credits & Monitoring
If the City decides that it desires more credits than the RCWD allowable volume on any
given project, it may undergo additional monitoring. The City will notify RCWD that
monitoring of the system is being done and at least three years of irrigation volume
records will be required. The annual volume pulled from the reuse pond for irrigation
would be divided by the number of weeks the system was running and the area irrigated
to get a weekly rate (in/wk) of irrigation. This would be done for the three or more years of
irrigation monitoring data available. The updated number of credits for the reuse system
would be the average irrigation rate over the average length of time the system was
being used for irrigation. Wet periods that exceed the recent statistical average may
reduce the need for irrigation during the monitoring period. The City can request an
extension of the monitoring period if the initial monitoring period is characterized by
significantly above or below average precipitation.
B. Project Tracking Process
The estimated volume reduction for each irrigation project is calculated using the total irrigated
area and applying RCWD’s allowable irrigation depth of 0.5 inches applied weekly for a 26-week
irrigation season. Allowable irrigation volumes will be verified in accordance with RCWD rules by
preparing the Metropolitan Council Stormwater Reuse Guide “Water Balance Tool – Irrigation
Constant Demand” spreadsheet to ensure designs have sufficient drainage area, storage and
demand over the growing season. Some of the projects involve infiltration galleries. These
galleries will likely vary in size, but their treatment capacity will be based on the Minimum Impact
Design Standards (MIDS) calculator developed by the MPCA.
The estimates of total volume reduction are given for each project in Section III.C below and are
summarized in Table 2, Appendix B. As projects enter into the design phase or are put on-line,
the credit tracking table will be updated with the actual volume reductions. The City will be
responsible for notifying RCWD that the project is functioning and available for compliance use
and will include the ROC (or ROCs) of the project is in and the volume reduction achieved at that
time.
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CITY OF HUGO
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610 PAGE 5
The City will keep a running accounting spreadsheet including credits created and credits being
used for development. At the end of the year the City will send the most up to date version of that
spreadsheet to RCWD and RCWD, at its own cost and initiative, may request to review
documents relating to the design, operation, monitoring of any credit generating reuse project, or
any permit using credits from a reuse project for compliance.
Based on direction provided by RCWD volume reduction credits for infiltration BMP projects
where grant funding was received from either RCWD or a different agency will be adjusted based
on the percentage of funding received from an agency. For example, if the total cost for a large
infiltration project was $400,000 and the City received $100,000 in grant funding from RCWD for
the project then only 75% (($400,000 $100,000)/$400,000) 75%) of the generated credits
would be available for use. This only applies to volume reduction credits from infiltration BMPs; all
volume reduction credits from water reuse projects will be available for use no matter the funding
source per RCWD.
C. Planned and Completed Projects
In 2011, the City of Hugo outlined 18 potential capital improvement projects designed to improve
water quality within the City. Several of these projects have been initiated and are currently being
designed and some have already been completed. In addition, multiple developments have
implemented their own water reuse systems providing volume reduction above what is required
by RCWD. A map depicting the location of each project listed below is included as Figure 4,
Appendix A.
1. Oneka Ridge Golf Course
The Oneka Ridge Golf Course Infiltration Project completed its first year of operation and
monitoring in 2014. In 2015, the Golf Course used 19.2 acre-feet of stormwater for
irrigation and an additional 2.26 acre-feet of stormwater was infiltrated. It is anticipated
that this system will generally use more water than was used in 2015 because of 2015
being a heavy rainfall year.
2. Beaver Ponds Park Irrigation Project
The Beaver Ponds Park Irrigation Project was completed in 2017 and consists of
pumping water from the existing stormwater pond constructed as part of the Beaver
Ponds Development and replacing and expanding the existing irrigation system with
stormwater. The Metropolitan Council awarded the City with a $50,000 grant to be used
towards the project. The project generates 6 credits based on irrigating 5.5 acres of
green space. Volume reduction credits from this project were generated within the Bald
Eagle Lake ROC drainage area.
3. Wilderness View Water Reuse Project
The Wilderness View Water Reuse Project will consist of pumping water from the RWJD
1 ditch upstream of Fish Lake to allow for stormwater runoff to be used for irrigation
purposes over the Wilderness View Residential Development. It is estimated that this
project will provide an annual volume reduction of eight acre-feet. This project will lead to
water quality improvements in Bald Eagle Lake and RWJD1.
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CITY OF HUGO
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610 PAGE 6
4. Infiltrate and Irrigate Lions Park
The Lions Park infiltration and irrigation project is currently under design and will consist
of pumping water from the Water’s Edge Development stormwater ponds to Lions Park
for both infiltration and irrigation. It is anticipated that this project will provide a volume
reduction of 35 acre-feet through irrigation and an addition 11 acre-feet through
infiltration. Volume reduction credits from this project will generate credits within the
Hardwood Creek ROC drainage area.
5. Egg Lake Perimeter Stormwater Reuse System
The Egg Lake Stormwater Reuse System project would consist of pumping stormwater
runoff from a perimeter pond constructed around Egg Lake for irrigation purposes in
selected areas. The estimated benefits of this project include an annual volume reduction
of 35 acre-feet. This project will be fully designed when redevelopment projects on the
northwest side of Egg Lake become active. Volume reduction credits from this project will
generate credits within the Egg Lake ROC Drainage Area.
6. Water’s Edge Water Reuse and Irrigation
The Water’s Edge Water Reuse and Irrigation project will consist of pumping water from
selected stormwater ponds within the Water’s Edge Development and using this water for
irrigation purposes. Phase 1 of this project is complete, and Phase 2 is currently in
design/construction. The initial phase of stormwater irrigation included replacing seven
irrigation accounts currently using city water with stormwater. Phase 1 irrigated 25 acres
of green space and Phase 2 is planned to irrigate 61.1 acres, creating a total of 93.3
credits within the Peltier Lake ROC drainage area when both phases are completed.
7. CSAH 8 City Accounts Irrigation project
This project consists of pumping water located north of Frenchman Road and west of
Oneka Parkway North and using it for irrigation purposes. The stormwater will replace
potable water for six irrigation accounts adjacent to County Road 8 and will be used to
irrigate 6.25 acres. The RCWD has awarded the City $150,000 in grants thus far for the
development of this project. The preliminary design for this project is underway, and the
City Council has approved the creation of a finalized water balance model. It is estimated
that, upon implementation, this project will provide 22 acre-feet of volume reduction.
8. Irrigate Clearwater Creek Park
This project consists of pumping water from Clearwater Creek and using it to irrigate an
80 acre park property located west of Fenway Blvd. and south of 140th Street. This
project could be implemented in conjunction with the irrigation project proposed for
Harley Sod Fields (which is located immediately north of this parcel). It is anticipated that
this would provide a volume reduction of up to 170 acre-feet annually.
9. Irrigate Future Fable Hills Park
This project consists of pumping water from a stormwater pond within the Fable Hills
Development and using the stormwater to irrigate a planned Fable Hills Park located
within the subdivision. The estimated benefits of this project include a volume reduction
of 76 acre-feet.
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CITY OF HUGO
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610 PAGE 7
10. Arbre Park Irrigation Project
This project consists of pumping water from a pond adjacent to Arbre Park and using this
stormwater for irrigation purposes. It is noted that this park is already being irrigated
using city water. The estimated benefits for this project include a volume reduction of five
acre-feet.
11. Val Jean Park Water Re-use Project
This project consists of pumping water from a stormwater pond located adjacent to Val
Jean Park and using this water to irrigate the park property. This park is already irrigated
with city water. If implemented, this project would provide a volume reduction of up to four
acre-feet.
12. Irrigate Public Property around Water’s Edge School
This project consists of pumping water from a nearby pond and irrigating 20.9 acres
within school property with stormwater. It is estimated that this irrigation project could
provide a volume reduction of 45 acre-feet.
13. Heritage Pond Park Water Reuse System
This project consists of irrigating and infiltrating approximately 14.7 acres of park land
using stormwater within Heritage Pond's Park. The estimated benefits for this project
include a volume reduction of 32 acre-feet due to irrigation and an additional three acre-
feet due to infiltration.
14. Oneka Ponds Park Water Reuse System
This project consists of irrigating and infiltrating stormwater in Oneka Ponds Park by
utilizing runoff from the Oneka Ponds Development. The estimated irrigation area is 34
acres of park land and would result in a volume reduction of 84 acre-feet (74 from
irrigation and 10 from infiltration).
15. Diamond Point Park Water Reuse System
This project consists of constructing a water reuse system to irrigate and infiltrate water in
Diamond Point Park. The irrigation area for the project is approximately 12.6 acres, which
would result in an estimated volume reduction of 27 acre-feet annually because of
irrigation, and an additional 14 acre-feet reduction from infiltration.
16. Rice Lake Soccer Fields Water Reuse System
This project consists of irrigating and infiltrating 12 acres of soccer fields and/or City of
Hugo Public Works Garage property with stormwater runoff taken from stormwater ponds
installed as part of the construction of the City of Hugo's Public Works Garage. The
estimated benefits for the project include a volume reduction of 43 acre-feet, of which 26
acre-feet comes from irrigation.
17. Hugo Gravel Pit Infiltration System
This project consists of pumping stormwater runoff from areas adjacent to the gravel pit.
It is anticipated the project will provide a volume reduction of 27 acre-feet.
18. Harley Sod Field Irrigation Project
This project consists of pumping water from Clearwater Creek to irrigate 100 acres of the
Harley Sod operation located south of Frenchman Road and west of Fenway Avenue.
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CITY OF HUGO
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610 PAGE 8
The property owner will need to approve of project before it can move to high priority. If
approved, the project will provide an estimated 215 acre-feet volume reduction.
19. Clearwater Cove Irrigation
The project consists of pumping water from stormwater ponds within the Clearwater Cove
development to provide irrigation for the green space within the development. The
irrigation was put in place with the construction of the development in 2016. The
development meets water quality requirements through the dead storage within the
ponds allowing the entirety of the water reuse system to generate credits.
20. Oneka Place Development Reuse System
The project consists of pumping water from stormwater ponds within the Oneka Place
development to provide irrigation for the green space within the development. The
irrigation was put in place with the construction of the development in 2019. A portion of
the volume reduction required by RCWD was provided by the water reuse system so only
the surplus of volume reduction can be used to generate credits.
21. Adelaide Landing Development Reuse System
The project consists of pumping water from stormwater ponds within the Adelaide
Landing development to provide irrigation for the green space within the development.
The irrigation was put in place with the construction of the development in 2018. A portion
of the volume reduction required by RCWD was provided by the water reuse system so
only the surplus of volume reduction can be used to generate credits.
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CITY OF HUGO
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610 PAGE 9
CONCLUSION
Using this CSMP as a guide, the City of Hugo will construct regional-scale stormwater reuse projects to
decrease groundwater demand for irrigation and improve surface water quality. The regional projects
would be used to provide volume reduction for public linear projects and/or volume reduction required for
private development. The projects described in this CSMP will be achieved on public land or in public-
private partnerships. The granting of credits for infiltration does not release development and linear
projects from meeting other RCWD and City of Hugo rules. If RCWD rules change in the future, the
CSMP may need to be updated to align with the RCWD updated rules.
Credits will be created in two steps:
1) Credits will be received after project construction completion, the irrigation surface has been
graded, and seeding placed and the irrigation system is functional.
2) Additional credits may be received, if the City desires, through extended monitoring.
Once awarded, all volume reduction credits are irrevocable.
The City believes that natural resource management and preservation is an essential component of the
high quality of life in Hugo. Through intelligent stormwater management and water preservation, the City
of Hugo will continue in the pursuit of its goal to “Reduce, Reuse, and Replenish” local water resources.
Future developments will be responsible to submit a proposal to the City first. The application must
document that the proposed land use impervious area are consistent with the Master Plan used in
developing this CSMP. If future developments wish to deviate from the standards outlined in this CSMP, it
is the responsibility of the developer to prepare an application documenting the proposed deviation(s) and
how that difference will be mitigated.
If the development exceeds the CSMP maximum impervious allowed, the application must demonstrate
how the additional runoff will be treated to meet the applicable RCWD rules.
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
CITY OF HUGO
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610 PAGE 10
REFERENCES
Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. (2009). Hardwood Creek Impaired Biota (Fish) and Dissolved Oxygen
TMDL Implementation Plan.
Emmons & Olivier Resources, Inc. (2011). CMSCWD Multi-Lakes TMDL, October 20, 2011 Draft.
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (2012). Water Quality Data: Surface Water Monitoring Sites and
Data. Available online at http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/water/water-monitoring-and-
reporting/water-quality-and-pollutants/water-quality-data.html. Accessed [2/12/15].
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (2014). Minnesota’s Impaired Waters and TMDLs. Available online at
http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/water/water-types-and-programs/minnesotas-impaired-
waters-and-tmdls/maps-of-minnesotas-impaired-waters-and-tmdls.html. Accessed [2/12/15].
Rice Creek Watershed District (2010). State of the Lakes. Available online at
http://www.ricecreek.org/vertical/sites/%7BF68A5205-A996-4208-96B5-
2C7263C03AA9%7D/uploads/%7B3FC0BE9E-6249-4E48-8247-C7FF6887DE95%7D.PDF.
Accessed [2/12/15].
Rice Creek Watershed District (2017). District Rules. Available online at
http://www.ricecreek.org/vertical/Sites/%7BF68A5205-A996-4208-96B5-
2C7263C03AA9%7D/uploads/RCWD_Rules_approved_12-14-2016_effective_1-1-2017.pdf
Rice Creek Watershed District (2014). Oneka Ridge Golf Course Water Re-Use Irrigation Project.
Available online at http://www.ricecreek.org/index.asp?SEC={31ABD821-A665-4BD3-BD8C-
94D2358D5FE0}&DE={F968FCD9-42ED-4D64-ABD5-B58EB8BF0715}&Type=B_PR. Accessed
[8/8/2014].
Sanja Perica, Deborah Martin, Sandra Pavlovic, Ishani Roy, Michael St. Laurent, Carl Trypaluk, Dale
Unruh, Michael Yekta, Geoffrey Bonnin (2013). NOAA Atlas 14 Volume 8 Version 2, Precipitation-
Frequency Atlas of the United States, Midwestern States. NOAA, National Weather Service,
Silver Spring, MD.
Wenck (2012). Bald Eagle Lake Nutrient TMDL prepared for Rice Creek Watershed District. Available
online at http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/view-document.html?gid=17983. Accessed
[7/31/2014].
Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture.
Web Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database for the Twin Cities Region. Available online
at http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/. Accessed [4/7/2014].
WSB & Associates, Inc. (2018). Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan for the City of Hugo,
Minnesota.
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN APPENDIX
CITY OF HUGO
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610
Appendix A – Figures
£¤61
MN8
MN7
MN4
BaldEagleLake
BaldEagle Lake
Fish Lake
Sunset Lake
Round Lake
Rice Lake
Long Lake
EggLake
PeltierLake
Oneka Lake
HorseshoeLake
Figure 12005 Percent Impervious by Subwatershed
K 0 5,000
Feet
May 2020
City Bo undary
WMO Bou ndary
ROC Bo undary
2005 Percent Impervious
0 - 10%
10 - 25%
25 - 50%
Greater than 50%Document Path: K:\01904-610\GIS\Maps\Hugo_2005_Impervious.mxdDate: 5/12/2020
£¤61
MN8
MN7
MN4
BaldEagleLake
BaldEagle Lake
Fish Lake
Sunset Lake
Round Lake
Rice Lake
Long Lake
EggLake
Peltier Lake
Oneka Lake
HorseshoeLake
Figure 2 2040 Estimated Percent Impervious by Subwatershed
K 0 5,000
Feet
May 2020
City Bo undary
WMO Bou ndary
ROC Bo undary
2040 Percent Impervious
0 - 10%
10 - 25%
25 - 50%
Greater than 50%Document Path: K:\01904-610\GIS\Maps\Hugo_2030_Impervious.mxdDate: 5/12/2020
£¤61
MN8
MN7
MN4
BaldEagleLake
BaldEagle Lake
Fish Lake
Sunset Lake
Round Lake
Rice Lake
Long Lake
EggLake
Peltier Lake
Oneka Lake
HorseshoeLake
Figure 3Estimated Percent Change in Impervious by Subwatershed
K 0 5,000
Feet
May 2020
City Bo undary
WMO Bou ndary
ROC Bo undary
PercChange
No Change
0 - 10%
10 - 25%
25 - 50%
Greater than 50%Document Path: K:\01904-610\GIS\Maps\Figure 3_Hugo_Change_In_Impervious.mxdDate: 5/12/2020
£¤61
MN8
MN7
MN4
BaldEagleLake
Bald EagleLake Fish Lake
Sunset Lake
Round Lake
Rice Lake
Long Lake
Egg Lake
PeltierLake
Oneka Lake
HorseshoeLake
2
4 5
3
6
7
8
9
10 11
1213
14
15
16
17
18
1
19
20
21
Figure 4Regional BMP by Resource of Concern Drainage Area
K 0 5,000
Feet
May 2020
InDesignPr
Future Project
In Use or In Design
City Boundary
WMO Boundary Document Path: K:\01904-610\GIS\Maps\Figure 4_Hugo_ROC_Projects_051220.mxdDate: 5/28/2020Regional BMPs 1. Oneka Ridge Golf Course 2. Beaver Ponds Park Irrigation/Infiltration Project 3. Wilderness View Water Reuse Project 4. Infiltrate & Irrigate Lions Park 5. Egg Lake Perimeter Stormwater Re-use System 6. Water's Edge Water Re-use/Irrigation 7. County Road 8 Water Re-use System 8. Irrigate Clearwater Creek Park 9. Irrigate Future Fable Hills Park 10. Arbre Park Irrigation Project 11. Val Jean Park Water Re-use Project 12. Irrigate Public Property Around School W ithin Water's Edge N Subdivision 13. Heritage Pond Park Irrigation System 14. Oneka Ponds Water Re-use System 15. Diamond Point Park Water Re-use System 16. Rice Lake Soccer Fields Water Re-use System 17. Hugo Gral Pit Infiltration System 18. Harley Sod Field Irrigation Project 19. Clearwater Cove Development Irrigation Project 20. Oneka Place Development Reuse System 21. Adelaide Landing Devleopment Reuse System
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN APPENDIX
CITY OF HUGO
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610
Appendix B – References
K:\01904-610\Admin\Docs\2020 Update\Appendix B - References\Credit Valuation Guide_20200611.docx
Value of One Credit:
· The average annual rainfall in Hugo (1980-2009) during the growing season is 23.51 inches.
Non-Linear Projects
· Per Rice Creek Watershed District rules and MPCA performance goals (for non-linear projects),
BMPs should be designed to capture 1.1” of runoff from impervious surfaces1. It is assumed that
rainfall depths over 1.1” would not be captured and wouldn’t be used for irrigation. Based on
rainfall analysis from RCWD approximately 20.38” of rainfall annually could be captured
· Assuming one acre of impervious surface, the amount of runoff that will be captured and
infiltrated each year is as follows:
(1) 1 ∗. ∗ = 1.698 /!
· Therefore, 1.698 credits are generated from capturing the runoff of one new acre of impervious
surface.
· One volume reduction credit is sufficient to cover a non-linear project of 25,650 ft2 of new
impervious surface.
· One credit is equal to 1 acre-foot of infiltration per year.
Equivalence of One Credit:
· The BMP size requirements for one acre of new or reconstructed impervious surfaces are as
follows:
(2) 1 ∗ 1.1 "#ℎ% ∗ = 0.0917 ( )*+ ,(-./
· Capturing runoff from one acre of impervious surface generates 1.698 credits, and 1 acre of new
or reconstructed impervious requires 0.0917 acre feet of BMP capacity. Therefore, the number
of credits required in terms of impervious area can be determined:
(3) .01 234.50 6 = 7 234 6
1 8" = 0.054 )*+
· The amount of impervious surface that requires a 0.0540 acre-foot (2,352 ft3) BMP can be
determined using the 1.1” standard for non-linear projects.
Linear Projects
· The same calculations can be done for public linear projects where RCWD requirements state
1.0” of runoff from new impervious surfaces must be captured. Rainfall analysis from RCWD
show 19.87” of rainfall annually could be captured.
K:\01904-610\Admin\Docs\2020 Update\Appendix B - References\Credit Valuation Guide_20200611.docx
(1) 1 ∗0.1 ∗ = 1.656 /!
· Therefore, 1.656 credits are generated from capturing the runoff of one new acre of impervious
surface.
· One volume reduction credit is sufficient to cover a-linear project of 26,300 ft2 of new
impervious surface.
· One credit is equal to 1 acre-foot of infiltration per year.
Equivalence of One Credit:
· The BMP size requirements for one acre of net new impervious surfaces are as follows:
(2) 1 ∗ 1.0 "#ℎ% ∗ = 0.0833 ( )*+ ,(-./
· Capturing runoff from one acre of impervious surface generates 1.656 credits, and 1 acre of net
new impervious requires 0.0833 acre feet of BMP capacity. Therefore, the number of credits
required in terms of impervious area can be determined:
(3) . 234.5<5 6 = 7 234 6
1 8" = 0.0503 )*+
· The amount of impervious surface that requires a 0.0503 acre-foot (2,191 ft3) BMP can be
determined using the 1.0” standard for linear projects.
Determining the Value of One Credit
· By using credits, more of the purchased land can be used towards development. Therefore, the
amount saved by a developer includes both property value and cost of BMP implementation.
· In Hugo, land costs approximately $1.50/square foot2.
· For consistency, a value of 1 acre of impervious surface will be evaluated.
· Using equation two, the BMP required is 0.0917 acre feet, or 4000 cubic feet.
· Standard stormwater ponds average three to four feet in depth for a permanent pool3.
Approximately the same area is commonly needed for live storage. Therefore, the area saved by
utilizing credits is estimated to be 2,300 square feet, or $3500 at $1.50 per square foot:
4000 .=" > 3.5 = 1143 %?. ∗ 2 ( -", %(A = 2,286 %?.
· Assuming an average of $6.80 per cubic foot3 and multiplying by the required 4000 cubic feet a
BMP of the required size is estimated to cost $27,200.
K:\01904-610\Admin\Docs\2020 Update\Appendix B - References\Credit Valuation Guide_20200611.docx
To summarize:
· The cost of BMP implementation and the land required to manage the runoff from one acre of
impervious is $30,650
$27,200 +E $1.50%?. (( ∗ 2,300 %?. F = $30,650
· Approximately 1.698 credits are required to infiltrate the mandated volume for a private
development that creates 1 acre of new impervious surface.
Therefore, the estimated volume reduction credit value is $30,650 ÷ 1.698 = $18,050.
1. Rice Creek Watershed District Rules and MPCA Performance Goals
2. Assuming $1.50/square foot as a city-wide average (Jay Kennedy, PE, WSB & Associates)
3. https://www3.epa.gov/region1/npdes/stormwater/ma/green-infrastructure-stormwater-bmp-cost-
estimation.pdf
Regional BMPArea Irrigated (ac)Anticipated Credits when System Online (Based on 0.5"/week)Additional Credits after 3 years of Monitor Data Credits UsedDate of Project CompletionResourceArbre Park Irrigation2.22.400---Peltier LakeBeaver Ponds Park Irrigation/Infiltration5.56006100%July 2017Bald Eagle LakeClearwater Cove Irrigation16.317.70017.7100%November 2016Peltier LakeClearwater Creek Park Irrigation7985.600---Peltier LakeCSAH 8 Irrigation6.36.800--Anticipated 2021Peltier LakeDiamond Point Park Water Re-Use System12.613.700---Rice LakeEgg Lake Perimeter Stormwater Re-Use System16.417.800---Egg LakeFable Hills Park Irrigation35.238.100---Peltier LakeHarley Sod Field Irrigation100108.300---Peltier LakeHeritage Pond Park Irrigation14.715.900---Peltier LakeHugo Gravel Pit Infiltration System1010.800---Peltier LakeLions Park Infiltration/Irrigation1617.300---Peltier LakeOneka Ponds Water Re-Use System3436.800---Oneka Lake/Peltier LakeOneka Ridge Golf Course (Bald Eagle Lake ROC)**150*47.50047.5100%November 2014Bald Eagle LakeOneka Ridge Golf Course (Peltier Lake ROC)**150*2.5002.5100%November 2014Peltier LakeRice Lake Soccer Fields Water Re-Use System121300---Rice LakeVal Jean Park Water Re-Use1.8200---Peltier LakeWater's Edge Irrigation2527.10027.1100%November 2017Peltier LakeWater's Edge North Subdivision61.166.200--In Construction 2020Peltier LakeWilderness View Water Reuse3.53.800---Bald Eagle LakeAdelaide Landing Development Irrigation58.7*34.60034.6100%June 2018Peltier LakeOneka Place Development Irrigation23.6*4.2004.2100%May 2019Peltier Lake*Some projects use the reuse system to meet water quality requirements. In these cases only the surplus of the volume reduction can be used to generate credits.**Some projects span multiple ROC subwatersheds. Credits were split based on irrigated area within each ROC subwatershedRemainingTABLE 2 CITY OF HUGO REGIONAL BMP SUMMARY
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN APPENDIX
CITY OF HUGO
WSB PROJECT NO. 1904-610
Appendix C – Flow Chart
Can volume control be provided on-site or has it been planned for regionally?On-Site Infiltration (must be considered first)Water quality treatment volume provided: ______________% Met: ___________ On-Site Water ReuseWater quality treatment volume provided: ____________% Met: ___________Volume credits may be purchased from the City as available from a regionally planned reuse project within the same Resource of ConcernCan a different stormwater BMP be located onsite to provide water quality treatment?Stormwater PondsWater quality treatment volume provided: ____________% Met: ___________ Filtration/BiofiltrationWater quality treatment volume provided: _____________% Met: ____________ Can stormwater BMPs be located in a downstream location that intercepts the runoff volume leaving the project site prior to the ROC? Can stormwater BMPs be located anywhere within the same ROC Drainage Area that results in no greater mass of Total Phosphorus reaching the resource of concern than on-site BMPs? Volume credits may be purchased from the City as available within the same Resource of ConcernRequired water quality treatment volume from BMP selection (show calculation): Has the water quality treatment volume requirement been 100% met?If requirement is not 100% met, revise BMP design or apply for RCWD Stormwater Variance. YesNoNOYES NOYES Water quality treatment volume provided: __________% Met: __________Water quality treatment volume provided: __________% Met: __________NOYESBegin HereProject Name: ________________WSB Project #: ________________Reviewed By: _________________ROC: Resource of ConcernBMP: Best Management PracticeRCWD: Rice Creek Watershed DistrictNOYES
RESOLUTION NO. ______
CITY OF HUGO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION
APPROVING THE CITY OF HUGO
COMPREHENSIVE STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Hugo is a leader in the state of Minnesota for water stewardship and
conservation and follows a reduce, reuse, and replenish philosophy; and
WHEREAS, The Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan describes and tracks a system
of regional water reduction projects (primarily runoff reuse for irrigation) that generate volume
reduction credits; and
WHEREAS, the City can use these credits generated for local road improvement projects or
development projects in lieu of stormwater Best Management Practices as long as they are in
the same Resources of Concern drainage area; and
WHEREAS, The City can use these credits for local improvement projects or sell these credits
to a developer where stormwater Best Management Practices have difficulty being met onsite;
and
WHEREAS, Rice Creek Watershed District has reviewed and been a part of the development of
this plan.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUGO, MINNESOTA:
That the City of Hugo Comprehensive Stormwater Management Plan is hereby approved.
This resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Hugo on the 3rd day of August,
2020, by a vote of Ayes and Nays.
Tom Weidt, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michele Lindau, City Clerk
(seal)
17/30/2020 1:22 PMHugo City CouncilSu Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa12345678910111213141516 17 18 19 20 21 2223 24 25 26 27 28 2930 31August 2020Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa12345678910111213 14 15 16 17 18 1920 21 22 23 24 25 2627 28 29 30September 2020August 2020Jul 262728293031Aug 1Filing for Candidacy 2345678Filing for Candidacy 7:00pm Council Meets91011121314155:00pmFiling for Candidacy 7:00am Primary Election6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm161718192021227:00pm Council Meets5:00pm EDA6:30pm Hist. Comm.7:00pm Parks Comm232425262728295:00pm Burger Night (Legion)6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm3031Sep 12345SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAYTHURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY
27/30/2020 1:22 PMHugo City CouncilSu Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa12345678910111213 14 15 16 17 18 1920 21 22 23 24 25 2627 28 29 30September 2020Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa1234567891011 12 13 14 15 16 1718 19 20 21 22 23 2425 26 27 28 29 30 31October 2020September 2020Aug 3031Sep 123456789101112Labor Day (United States)7:00pm Council Meets6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm131415161718195:00pm EDA6:30pm Hist. Comm.7:00pm Parks Comm202122232425267:00pm Council Meets5:00pm Burger Night (Legion)6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm27282930Oct 123SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY