Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC Packet 05.28.20CI I Y OF�- Agenda Hugo Planning Commission Thursday, May 28, 2020 REMOTE MEETING 7:00 PM Meeting to be held remotely pursuant Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.021 Anyone who wishes to speak at the meeting is strongly encouraged to make arrangements by 4:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting by contacting Community Development Assistant, Emily Weber at 651-762-6311 or eweber@ci.hugo.mn.us. For more information on the remote meeting and participation, go to: www.ci.hugo.mn.us/planning Meeting ID: 873 2167 8954 A. ROLL CALL: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Luchsinger, Mulvihill, Tjernlund B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. May 14, 2020 D. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Pratt Ordway Properties. Request for a PUD Amendment and Site Plan for "Victor Place." 411111111ZP&TI MI31-L9Ii,1&SI 1. 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Projects G. ADJOURNMENT If you need accommodations for the Planning Commission meeting please contact Rachel Juba at (651) 762-6304 or rjuba@ci.hugo.mn., thank you. Minutes for the Plannine Commission Meetine of Thursday. Mav 15. 2020 Meeting held remotely pursuant Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.021 Chair Kleissler called the meeting to order at 7:01 pm. PRESENT: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Tjernlund. ABSENT: Luchsinger, Mulvihill. STAFF: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant Pledge of Allegiance. Approval of Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of April 23, 2020 Commissioner Arcand made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Fry to approve minutes for the meeting of April 23, 2020. Ayes: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard. Abstained: Tjernlund. Motion carried. Public Hearing: Hugo Gardens Apartments, LLC — Request for a PUD Amendment and Preliminary Plat for "Hugo Gardens Apartments." Kendra Lindahl, consultant planner for the City of Hugo, with Landform Professional Services provided background on the application. The property was previously approved and planned as part of the preliminary plat and PUD for "LaValle Fields." The current project includes development of Outlot B and construction of stormwater ponding on Outlot D. The PUD Amendment proposes 84 apartment units in seven buildings instead of the 165 units in three buildings originally approved in 2014. The new proposal has a net density of 10.66 units per acre, which is within the allowable density for the PUD. The buildings will have a mix of one, two, and three bedroom apartments for rent. The building plans are compatible with the Multi -Family Development Design Guidelines and staff believes the buildings are well -designed with good articulation to the building face to provide interest and variety. Staff recommends the final color palettes be further reviewed to include additional colors. The developer has worked with staff to orient the buildings to Finale Avenue where possible and encourages a walkable development. Staff recommends the landscape plan be redesigned to better define the street scape along Finale Avenue. Lindahl also provided details on parking, streets, and park dedication. Staff concluded that the PUD amendment and preliminary plat generally conform to City standards however, there are several May 14, 2020 PC Minutes Page 2 outstanding issues that must be clarified, and conditions that must be met by the applicant to ensure compliance with City standards. Staff recommends approval subject to the findings and conditions in the resolution. Commissioner Lessard wanted to ensure that the retaining walls on site will be safe for cars and pedestrians and suggested fencing. Commissioner Fry thought that the north end of the site looked crammed and wondered if the north end of the site could have a better layout. Lindahl responded that the applicant has tried various layouts and due to the unique shape of the site, the proposed layout is the most efficient. She also stated that she has suggested more parking in the open space in the center of the site. Applicant, Dean Dovolis, addressed the Planning Commission in response to staff's and Commissioner's comments. They welcome the suggestions made by staff and the Commissioners and are excited for the project. The proposed units will be a great addition to the downtown area and the Lions Park. Patrick Sarver, Civil Site Group, is working with the applicant and reiterated that the site plan has undergone a lot of variations. Chair Kleissler was worried that there would not be enough parking with only one garage space per unit. Dovolis responded that majority of the units are two bedrooms, which is accounted for. Chair Kleissler opened the public hearing at 7:34pm. Gina Hermann, 54211 146t" Street, has concerns with the apartment on the south side of the site being so close to the property line and would like to see a trail along the street. She also wanted to know a construction timeline. Dovolis stated that the goal is for construction to start in the summer and have the units available for rent by summer 2021. Chair Kleissler asked if the applicant is comfortable with the recommendations outlined in the resolution. Dovolis stated that they are comfortable with the conditions and will continue to work with staff. Chair Kleissler closed the public hearing at 7:37pm. The Commissioners discussed the proposed project. Among the discussion it was mentioned that the buildings look nice however, they could benefit from color variation. The variety of products and different unit types available will be a great addition to the City. Overall, they generally liked the proposal but agreed that there could be more parking if space is available. Commissioner Fry made a motion to approve the PUD Amendment and Preliminary Plat for "Hugo Gardens Apartments" subject to the conditions listed in the resolution, seconded by Tjernlund. Ayes: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Tjernlund. Nay: None. Motion carried. May 14, 2020 PC Minutes Page 3 Adjournment Commissioner Fry made a motion, Commissioner Arcand seconded, to adjourn at 7:45 pm. Ayes: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Tjernlund Nay: None. Motion carried. Respectfully Submitted, Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant Agenda Number D.1 CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Hugo Planning Commission FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform SUBJECT: Pratt Ordway Properties. Request for a PUD Amendment and Site Plan for "Victor Place" (PID 19-031-21-24-0077 and 19-031-21-23-0154) (City File No. 20-007) DATE: May 21, 2020for the Planning Commission Meeting of May 28, 2020 REVIEW DEADLINE: Waived by applicant DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a PUD amendment and site plan to allow construction of a single story, 13,879 square foot office/trail building. The development is primarily located on Lot 2, Block 1, Victor Gardens Commons and partially on Outlot A, Victor Gardens South Village. The parcels will be combined. 2. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The property is part of the Victor Gardens PUD. The property is guided Commercial and zoned PUD. The properties to the east and west are guided Commercial and zoned PUD as part of the Victor Gardens PUD. The property to the east is developed with Paws Pet Hospital and the property to west with office/retail including Kinder Gardens childcare center. The property to the south is guided Medium Density Residential, zoned PUD and developed with condominium townhomes. The property to the north (across Frenchman Road) is guided Commercial and zoned C-2 (General Business). The properties are developed with a clinic and daycare. B. Existing Site Characteristics The site is generally flat and buildable. There is a wetland on Outlot A that has been delineated, but as of the date of this report has not been approved. Victor Place Page 2 C. Background In 2004, City approved a PUD amendment and preliminary plat for Victor Gardens 4t" Addition. That project approved the 92 unit townhomes to the south, but provided concept plans for the commercial portion of the site only and deferred commercial approvals to a later date. In 2009, this property was replatted as Victor Gardens Commons with a PUD amendment that approved Paws Pet Hospital (Resolutions 2009-24 and 2009-25). The request showed only a concept plan for this site as part of the Paws approvals. The applicant's narrative noted that one access was provided for Paws and when Lot 2, Block 1 developed another access would be added across from the private street that serves the townhomes south of Victor Path. Furthermore, the developer indicated that a cross access and parking agreement would be recorded against both lots so that parking would be shared and two accesses would be provided to the project. 3. ANALYSIS: A. Level of City Discretion in Decision -Making The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving PUD amendments. A PUD must be consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety and welfare of the community and surrounding area. The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the Comprehensive Land Use Regulations. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the site plan. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards The Victor Gardens PUD is a compact, mixed -use development consisting of residential, retail, office, and institutional uses. The proposed planning and design approach is commonly referred to as Traditional Neighborhood Development (TND). In short, the design concept includes 1) neighborhoods defined by public spaces, 2) a range of housing types, 3) street designs and pedestrian walkways that keep cars in perspective, 4) architecture that responds to its surrounding and local traditions and 5) a mix of land uses to meet the daily needs of residents. PUD Amendment This property is part of the Victor Gardens PUD, but no formal approvals were ever granted for development of the site. The PUD Amendment and Site Plan are requested for the planned 13,879 square foot office/retail building. The project was reviewed against the Victor Gardens PUD standards, previous approvals and City Land Use Regulations. Staff has been working with the applicant and their development team to develop the plan as it exists today. Victor Place Page 3 Lot Standards This is an existing lot of record that was established as part of Victor Gardens Commons. The parking and grading will cross over onto Outlot A; therefore, staff has included a condition requiring that the two parcels be combined into one parcel. Once that combination is executed that site will comply with all building setback requirements. PUD Standards Proposed Front building setback 15 feet 56+/- feet Side building setback n/a 75+ feet Rear building setback n/a n/a Perimeter setback 30 feet 30 feet Parking 10 feet 9'8" The plans show an 9'8" setback from the public street for the proposed parking where 10 feet is required by Code. The parking stalls are shown as 9' x 20' where 9' x 18' stalls are required. Staff recommends that the stall depth along the street be reduced in depth to allow for the 10-foot setback along Victor Path. Building Architecture One of the key components of the Victor Gardens PUD is the French County Eclectic design character. This style is characterized by steeply pitched hip roofs, a variety of natural stones and brick, vertical elements and a variety of decorative cornice and rooflines. The hip roof elements are intended to screen the mechanical roof top units. These pitched rooftop elements were to be located on three sides at the ends of the buildings to screen provide this screening. The buildings should have a variety of rooflines to create the look of several buildings and facades to add interest to the buildings. Additionally, the previous approvals required the architecture to be compatible with the townhomes. Staff has worked closely with the development team to try to meet these design goals. The developer has added the pitched hip roof elements as required by the PUD; however, staff believes that additional revisions are needed to meet the intent of the PUD. Specifically, we have asked the developer to replicate the south roof line on the north elevation. The south elevation has a varied roofline including two steep hip roof elements, but the north elevation only has one such pitched roof line. This creates two issues: • The building does not create an authentic roofline that one would expect if it were a true hip roof element. • The pitched hip rooflines do not align on the north elevation and south elevation; therefore, the back of the north roof line will be visible from the south side and vice -versa. Staff continues to recommend that the south elevation be replicated on the north elevation to create an authentic building appearance that is consistent with the PUD standards. We have included this a condition of approval in the attached resolution. Victor Place Page 4 Developer Plans: *i: Staff recommendation: EIRER R ELEVATION Final color palettes and physical material samples shall be provided to the City prior to final approval. Trash Enclosures The original PUD approvals required that the trash and recycling areas be designed internal to the building or as an integral part of the building; however, there are other detached trash enclosures in the PUD. The applicant's design shows a detached trash enclosure to the west of the building. No details for the trash enclosure have been provided. Staff has included a condition requiring the trash enclosure to be designed to match the principal building. Mechanical Equipment Screening All mechanical equipment is planned to be on the roof and shall be screened from view of adjacent properties. The applicant shall provide additional information to show how this condition will be met. Victor Place Page 5 Lighting The ordinance requires lighting to consist of cut-off fixtures and for light cast on adjacent property and roads not to exceed'/2 foot candle measured at the property line or 1-foot candle measured at the street's centerline. The plans comply with these standards. Signage Wall signage is shown in sign bands on the north and south elevations. No freestanding signage is shown. All signage must comply with the Victor Gardens PUD standards. The applicant must apply for a sign permit with details ensuring compliance with ordinance requirements. Parking The City Code requires one space for every 200 square feet. This site requires 70 parking stalls and 77 are provided. The site plan notes 78 stalls are provided and must be updated. The Land Use regulations discourage dead end drive aisles but the shape of this site with the building as proposed make it difficult to provide continuous circulation. The parking areas on the east and west sides of the building do not allow for vehicular circulation and consideration should be given to striping one of the northernmost stalls in both areas as "no parking" to allow for the ability to turn around without having to back out of these dead-end aisles should the parking lot be full. The previous approved required shared parking with a cross access and parking easement with the property owners to the east. The developer and adjacent landowner have asked that this condition be removed from the PUD standards. Access As noted, the original approvals required shared parking with the property to the east and limited access to that existing curb cut on the Paws Pet Hospital site and a second access to serve this site to be located across from the private drive that serves the townhomes to the south. The developer has asked that the PUD be amended to eliminate this condition. The plans show a new access approximately 60 feet west of the Paws access and a 211 access to this lot near the west property line. Staff supports the two accesses to the site. We worked closely with the development team to evaluate an access across from the private drive as planned or as far west as possible to eliminate conflicts with the driveways to the south. Unfortunately, with the current building plan, aligning the access with the private drive to the south would bring the access directly into the handicapped stalls and would result in less functional circulation in the site. The applicant has pushed the access a far west as possible based the unapproved wetland delineation. Staff supports the access locations; however, once the wetland delineation is approved it should reexamined to try to move the access further west to eliminate conflicts with the driveways on the south. Victor Place Page 6 Sidewalks/Trails The developer has provided good sidewalk connections throughout the site and out to Victor Path. The sidewalk on Victor Path will be constructed in front of these two parcels by the developer with this project. The applicant will need to dedicate a trail easement on the north side of the site to connect to the planned County Trail on Frenchman Road. The easement will allow the County/City to construct the connection to the development when the County Trail is constructed in the future. Landscaping The plans show a continuation of the street tree planting of Elms and Maples along Victor Path between the curb and sidewalk. Additionally, the plans show 13 overstory deciduous trees, 10 overstory coniferous trees, 6 ornamental trees and 52 shrubs. The Code requires 13 overstory deciduous trees, 7 overstory coniferous trees, 7 ornamental trees and 67 shrubs. The plans must be revised to add the additional ornamental tree and shrubs required by the ordinance. The code requires an amount not less than one percent of the cost of improvements made as part of a development be expended on landscaping. The applicant shall provide additional information to ensure compliance. The applicant intends to install irrigation on the site. The applicant is required to submit an irrigation plan as part of the landscape plan package as a condition of approval. Wetlands The wetlands on site were delineated and is currently being reviewed. No wetland impacts are anticipated, but the wetland delineation must be approved prior to issuance of permits. A Technical Evaluation Panel meeting will take place the week of May 25th to review the location of the wetland west of the proposed improvements. Grading/Drainage There is a drainage and utility easement over Outlot A. The applicant will need to apply for an easement vacation for the area where parking lot improvements are planned and new a new easement will need to be provided over the wetland and watermain. The stormwater management for this site was included in the master plan for the Victor Gardens PUD and is served by a regional stormwater basin. A storm sewer pipe was extended into the property from Victor Path to collect stormwater from the site and drain it to the regional stormwater basin. The applicant has surveyed the existing regional stormwater pond to confirm capacity. Stormwater comments have been provided to applicant and will need to be addressed in future submittals for documentation and permitting purposes. Victor Place Page 7 Utilities The site is served by municipal sanitary sewer and water. Park Dedication and Open Space Commercial/Industrial property is exempt from Park Dedication. C. Conclusions Staff reviewed the PUD amendment and site plan against City standards and the original PUD approvals and finds that the proposed project generally conforms. However, there are several outstanding issues that must be clarified, and conditions that must be met by the applicant to ensure compliance with City standards. Most of the outstanding issues are very minor, however, the architecture issue does remain as a significant issue. Staff recommends that the applicant revise the plans as noted in the staff report. The Commission should review and discuss this issue and provide a recommendation to the City Council. 4. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the PUD amendment and site plan for Victor Place, subject to the findings and conditions listed in the attached resolutions. ATTACHMENTS: a. Draft Resolution Approving the PUD Amendment and Site Plan b. Location Map c. Engineer's Memo dated May 21, 2020 d. Applicant's Narrative dated March 5, 2020 e. Paws letter dated March 12, 2020 f. Plan Set received on May 15, 2020 g. Comparison of Proposed Elevation and recommended Alternatives dated May 18, 2020 RESOLUTION 2020 - APPROVING PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) AMENDMENT AND SITE PLAN FOR "VICTOR PLACE" (PID 19-031-21-24-0077 AND 19-031-21-23-0154) WHEREAS, Pratt Ordway Properties has requested approval of a PUD amendment and site plan to allow construction of a 13,879 square foot office/retail building on property legally described as follows: Lot 2, Block 1, Victor Gardens Commons and Outlot A, Victor Gardens South Village WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said PUD amendment and site plan at a duly called Public Hearing on May 28, 2020 and recommends approval subject to the conditions listed; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Pratt Ordway Properties for the PUD amendment and site plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. A PUD amendment is approved to allow the construction of a 13,879 square foot office/retail building, in accordance with the application and plans received on March 5, 2020 and revisions received on May 15, 2020, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The developer must comply with the Victor Gardens PUD standards and the Victor Gardens Commons approvals (Resolution 2009-24 and 2009-25), except: a. Resolution 2009-24 condition 13 and Resolution 2009-25 condition 7.a. requiring a parking and cross access agreement with Paws Pet Hospital is not required. b. Resolution 2009-24 condition 11 requiring construction of the trail connection to CSAH 8 trail is modified to require a trail easement only. 3. The plans must be revised to comply with the City Engineer's memo dated May 21, 2020. 4. The plans must be revised to comply with 10-foot minimum parking setback along Victor Path. 5. The architectural plans must be revised to address the following: a. The applicant shall mirror the south roof line on the north elevation. b. The applicant shall provide a final color palette and physical material sample for City review and approval. c. All mechanical units will be roof -mounted and shall be screened from view of adjacent properties. d. The gutters and drainpipes shall be integrated into the building design and shall be reviewed and approved by staff. e. The trash enclosure must be designed to match the principal structure. Details must be provided for staff review and approval. Resolution 2020- Page 2 6. The landscaping plan must be revised to address the following: a. The cost of landscaping must be included for the development agreement. The developer must provide a copy of the landscaping cost estimate to city staff. b. An irrigation plan must be provided. c. The landscaping plan does not meet the minimum standards for the number of trees and shrubs and must be revised and resubmitted for staff approval. 7. The wetland delineation for Outlot A must be approved. a. The western access should be reevaluated after approval of the delineation. b. The developer shall work with City staff to shift the western access west to eliminate the conflicts with the driveways to the south if feasible. 8. A trail easement must be provided to connect to the future trail on CSAH 8. 9. The developer shall construct the sidewalk on Victor Path from the east lot line of Lot 2, Block 1, Victor Gardens Commons to the west lot line of Outlot A, Victor Gardens South Village. 10. Signage must comply with the Victor Gardens PUD sign standards. The City will review for compliance when the sign permit is submitted. 11. The applicant must update the plans to show the drainage and utility easement in the southwest corner and work with staff to ensure that there are no conflicts with that existing easement and the proposed improvements. 12. The applicant shall apply for an easement vacation or other mechanism for that portion of the lot where parking lot improvements are planned over the Outlot A drainage and utility easement. The applicant shall coordinate with the City engineer. 13. Prior to issuance of building permits: a. The lot combination must be filed at Washington County. b. The development agreement must be executed and financial guarantees in place. c. A complete set of revised plans addressing the conditions of approval shall be submitted for city approval. d. The applicant shall obtain all necessary local, state, and federal permits. e. The developer must obtain all necessary stormwater management and WCA permits from the City. f. The developer shall obtain all necessary local, state, and federal permits. ADOPTED by the City Council this _ day of June 2020. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Resolution 2020- Page 3 7. 0 0 0 Z W 0o U) Z J a a F- Z a U) 0 0 N W U) W W W 00 wsb May 21, 2020 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Revised Site Plan Review Victor Place WSB Project No. 015617-000 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the revised site plan submittal for the Victor Place Site located south of Frenchman Road (CSAH 8) and west of Leopold Lane. In particular, we have reviewed the following plans related to this particular request: • Revised General, Architectural, and Civil Plan Sets dated 5/15/20 by Finn Daniels Architects and Plowe Engineering Inc. • Site Drainage Narrative & Stormwater Calculations Based on the review of the above documents, we offer the following comments related to this application: Grading, Street, and Utility Plans 1. Two accesses from Victor Path are proposed. Two access points do improve the circulation of traffic within the site. The access points are separated to the greatest extent practical and are acceptable. 2. The parking areas on the east and west sides of the building do not allow for vehicular circulation. Consideration should be given to striping one of the northernmost stalls on both lots as no parking to allow for the ability to turn around without having to back out of these lots should they be full. 3. A concrete walk is proposed to be extended along the north side of Victor Path. The Concrete walk will extend from the existing concrete walk at the eastern property line to a distance of approximately 90 feet west of the westerly access to the site. 4. Sanitary sewer service is available to the site from the existing 8" sanitary sewer pipe extended into the site from Victor Path. This service location is directly across from the private road on the south side of Victor Path. 5. Water service had previously been extended into the site from Victor Path. This service is located directly across from the private road on the south side of Victor Path. 6. The parking for the proposed Victor Place project extends into Outlot A. Outlot A and Lot 2 Block 1 should be combined. 7. Drainage and Utility Easements already exist on Lot 2, Block 1 Victor Gardens Commons (SW corner) and over all of Outlot A Victor Gardens South Addition. 8. The Drainage and Utility Easement within Outlot A where the proposed parking lots is proposed will require vacation or be addressed by some other mechanism. Existing \\MSPFSV02\DesignDepot\Workshop\City of Hugo\HUG20001 - Victor Place (city file 20-007)\2020-05-21 city engineers memo.docx Ms. Rachel Juba May 21, 2020 Page 2 Drainage and Utility Easements over watermain and wetlands will be required to remain in place. Staff will work with the applicant how on best to proceed with addressing this item. 9. Detailed redline comments have been provided on the plans and sent to the applicants engineer so they can be addressed in future submittals. Stormwater Manaaement 10. The site for this development had stormwater management accommodated for in a regional stormwater basin as part of the Victor Gardens Development. A storm sewer pipe was extended into the property from Victor Path to collect stormwater from the site and drain it to the regional stormwater basin. The applicant has surveyed the existing regional stormwater pond to confirm capacity 11. Stormwater plan and model comments have been provided to applicant and will need to be addressed in future submittals for documentation and permitting purposes. Wetland 12. A wetland delineation has been completed and a Technical Evaluation Panel meeting will take place the week of May 251" to review the location of the wetland west of the proposed improvements. Currently, there are no proposed impacts based on the wetland delineation submitted. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. Additional comments may be necessary following the review of the responses to these. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463. Sincerely, Mark Erichson, PE City Engineer cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) Kendra Lindahl, Landform (email only) Sinn d4aniels A R C H I T E C T S 2145 Ford Parkway, Suite 301 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 Tel: 651.690.5525 Fax: 651.690.5545 www.finn-daniels.com March 5, 2020 PROJECT NARRATIVE Victor Place Hugo, MN General Information Project Name: Victor Gardens Requested Actions: PUD Amendment and Site Plan Approval Applicant & Owner: Pratt Ordway Properties 3555 Willow Lake Blvd. Vadnais Heights, MN 55110 Attn: Len Pratt Description of Request: Approval to construct to a one story approximately 13,879 square foot office/retail building on the vacant lot(s) (Lot 2, Block 1 Victor Gardens Commons and Outlot A Victor Gardens South Addition) Development Data Existing Zoning: Planned Unit Development Proposed Zoning: No change proposed Total Site Area (Lot 2 and Outlot A): 113,931 square feet (2.6 Acre) Surrounding Land Uses: • To the west and south of the site, contains the Victor Gardens Planned Unit Development with contains similar retail/commercial uses and well as single and multi -family residential properties. • To the north across Frenchman Road (CSAH 14) is the Frenchman Place commercial development. • To the east is Paws Pet Hospital which was approved and developed in 2009 as the first building in this adjunct portion of the Victor Gardens development. Circulation/Roads • The site is bordered by streets on two sides of the property. Frenchman Road (CSAH 14) to the north and Victor Patch to the south. • Two access points to the site from Victor Path are proposed, one at the west end of the property and one at the east end of the property. • In 2009, when the Paws Pet Hospital was approved/developed, the intention was to internally connect the Paw's property with the future development site. However, in the subsequent 10 plus years as the future development evolved into this current proposal, the Owner's of both Paw's Pet hospital and the Victor Place developer have determined that circulation, maintenance, liability, and overall site aesthetics are better served for the sites to remain independent. • Pedestrian access through the site is being maintained by continuing the 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk along Victor Path, and internal sidewalks to/from the building connecting to the proposed sidewalk along Victor Path. • Access is planned for a connection to the future trail along the south side of Frenchman Road (CSAH 14) as well. Grading and Drainage Drainage from the site will be collected via proposed storm sewers which drain into the existing drainage system in Victor Path. The existing drainage system was designed and constructed to convey runoff from the site, therefore, no on -site ponding is required. Regional storm water ponding basins were previously constructed with Victor Gardens to provide water quality treatment. Buildina Architecture The Victor Gardens PUD requires compatible architecture themes throughout the commercial development and that all four sides of the building have comparable finishes, leaving no underdeveloped backside of the building. The architecture for Victor Place borrows on the elements and finishes of the immediately adjacent building, Paw's Pet Hospital. Gable roof elements and the color/materials palette are the same or similar to Paws. Given the nature of the intended uses at Victor Place, the use of glass is also a predominate feature in this project. All roof mounted equipment shall be screened by the building wall parapet. The external attached trash enclosure will be clad with the same stone used on the building, and screened from view with additional landscaping along Frenchman Road. The building is designed for multiple tenants, thus there are multiple entrances and locations suitable for signage designed as part of the building architecture (again matching the element on the Paw's Pet Hospital building). The sign development criteria for Victor Gardens governs the signage at Victor Place. As the building has frontage on two streets, two signs per tenant (one facing each street are permitted). The total aggregate area of signage shall not exceed 10 percent of the gross wall area facing a street. Landscaping & Lighting Per the Victor Gardens PUD, boulevard trees are planted along Victor Path at a minimum of 50 feet on center. Additional overstory and understory/ornamental trees are planted throughout the parking area and the site perimeter to meet City of Hugo requirements. Site lighting is designed such that light cast on adjacent property and roads shall not exceed % foot candle, in compliance with City ordinance. QA W S Pet Hospital Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Victor Place Development Rachel, P.A.W.S. Pet Hospital, PLLC 4644 Victor Path Hugo, MN 55038 2020 March 12 We are aware of the proposed Victor Place development next door to our business, P.A.W.S/ Pet Hospital. The developer has informed us of the proposed City of Hugo requirement to connect the parking lots of the proposed development and P.A.W.S. We have numerous concerns regarding this: • Concerns with the additional traffic passing through our parking lot, with customers and their pets' safety in mind. • The loss of at least three parking stalls from our lot may affect the ability of our customers and staff to park in direct relation to our business. This is especially concerning when we have deliveries • The additional vehicle and truck traffic funneling through our site and street entrance will cause additional maintenance requirements to the P.A.W.S. parking lot. This will also create an issue concerning which property owner is responsible and maintaining those areas. • The aesthetics of combining our concrete parking lot with the developers proposed asphalt parking lot would not be visually appealing in the transition area, which by virtue of location would seem to likely happen on our property, in addition to the loss of landscaping along our west parking lot/property edge that the city required. Our site and parking lot, at present, function fine for our business. Any requirement to connect the parking lots has only negative consequences for us. The proposed development has two proposed entrances from Victor Path, which ensures their site can function independently from ours. Victor Path is not a heavily traveled road, it can certainly handle the two new site entrances proposed by the Victor Place development. While we are excited for and welcome the new development in our neighborhood, and the additional businesses it will bring, we strongly voice our opposition to any proposed parking lot connection between PAWS and the new development. Sincerely, ichelle Beck PAWS Pet Hospital, PLLC PROJECT TEAM OWNER/ PRATT ORDWAY PROPERTIES GOVERNING CITY OF HUGO DEVELOPER: 3555 WILLOW LAKE BLVD., SUITE 200 AUTHORITY: 14669 FITZGERALD AVE. NORTH VADNIAS HEIGHTS,MN 55110 HUGO, MN 55038 651.631.8059 (VOICE) 651.762.6300 ARCHITECT: FINN DANIELS, INC 2145 FORD PARKWAY, SUITE 301 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55116 651.888.6882 (VOICE) CONTACT: SCOTT WIESTLING EMAIL: swiestling@finn-daniels.com SURVEY/PLAT: EG RUD & SONS, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE NE, SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 651.361.8200 CONTACT: JASON RUD EMAIL: jrud@egrud.com GENERAL TO BE DETERMINED rnwirn n Arno. CIVIL PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. ENGINEER: 6776 LAKE DRIVE, SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MINNESOTA 55014 651.361.8210 (VOICE) CONTACT: ADAM GINKEL EMAIL: adam@plowe.com STRUCTURAL ALIGN STRUCTURAL, INC. ENGINEER: 241 CLEVELAND AVENUE S., SUITE B7 ST. PAUL, MINNESOTA 55105 651.698.0164 (VOICE) CONTACT: RICK JOHNSON EMAIL: rick]@alignstructural.com GENERAL NOTES GENERAL NOTES: contraction and shrinkage as necessary to prevent cracks, buckling and warping due to temperature and humidity conditions. 1. Items listed below are applicable to all contractors, subcontractors, vendors, suppliers and material handlers. 14.Attachments, connections or fastenings of any nature are to be properly in best the 2. The contract documents include the working drawings, addenda, and permanently secured conformance with practices and Contractor is responsible for installing them according to these modifications, and the conditions of the construction contract. conditions. The drawings show only special conditions to assist the Contractor, they do not illustrate every such condition and detail. 3. The contract documents are the instruments of service and shall remain the property of the architect whether the project for which they are 15. With reference to reflected ceilings, Contractor shall coordinate with all prepared is executed or not. The contract documents are not to be used by the landlord tenant for to the trades involved and prepare composite shop drawings to insure locations for fixtures, ducts, heads, or other projects or extensions project nor are they to be modified in any manner whatsoever except by and clearances ceilings, sprinkler grilles, etc., necessary to maintain the specified finish ceiling height agreement in writing and with appropriate compensation to the above the finish floor as noted on the drawings. Clarify conflicts and Architect. locations with the Architect before proceeding 4. General conditions of the Contract AIA Document A-201 shall be made 16.Use of moisture resistant treated wood blocking in construction shall part of these documents by reference. use the following guidelines: Carbon steel, aluminum and electroplated galvanized steel fasteners and connectors should not be used in contact 5. All work shall comply with the applicable codes, amendments, rules, with treated wood. Hot -dipped galvanized fasteners complying with regulations, ordinances, laws, orders approvals, etc., that are required by public authorities. In the event of conflict, the most stringent ASTM A153 and connectors complying with ASTM A653, Class G185, generally are acceptable. Type 304 or Type 316 stainless -steel fasteners requirements shall comply. Requirements include, but are not limited and connectors are recommended for maximum corrosion resistance. to the current applicable editions or publications. Fasteners with proprietory anti -corrosion coatings may be acceptable 6. All glazing used in this project shall conform to the requirements of all for use with treated wood. Aluminum fasteners, flashings and accessory products should not be used in direct contact with any treated wood. applicable codes and all Federal and State requirements. ACQ-treated wood is not compatible with aluminum. Uncoated metal 7. Finn Daniels, Inc. relies upon the professionalism and accuracy of work and painted metal flashin and accessories except for 300-series stainless steel, should no gbe used in direct contact with treated wood. designed by other subcontractors, and relies that the systems designed Metal products, except stainless steel, may be used if separated from by others will perform as required and per industry standards. treated wood by a spacer or barrier such as single -ply membrane or bitumen The CONTRACT DOCUMENT NOTES: self -adhered polymer -modified membrane material. use of non -treated, construction -grade wood is suitable for use as blocking taken to the 1. This set of documents is not all inclusive and is meant to show the intent of the scope of work. The contractor shall bid all work involved with a or nailers, provided reasonable measures are ensure non -treated wood remains reasonably dry when in service. It shall be normally anticipated scope of work. the responsibility of the General Contractor t coordinate blocking requirements with each Subcontractor and it s shall be up to the Subcontractor for installing blocking 2. All the sheets listed in the drawing index comprise the construction documents for this project. The G.C. is responsible for all the work to select suitable methods meeting the standards established above. defined in these construction documents including distributing drawings to subcontractors for bidding purposes. It is not recommended that 17.No work defective in construction or quality, or deficient in any requirements of drawings and specifications will be acceptable in individual sheets be given to subcontractors for bidding or construction. The entire set of drawings, not any individual sheets, define the work consequence of Owner's or Architect's failure to discover or to point out required under the general contract. defects or deficiencies during construction, nor will presence of inspectors on work site relieve Contractor from responsibility for 3. In the event of conflict between data shown on drawings and data securing quality and progress or work as required by contract. Defective work revealed within time required by guarantees shall be, whether shown in the specifications, the specifications shall govern. Dimensions noted on drawings shall take precedence over scaled dimensions. Detail Partial or final, construed as an acceptance of defective work or drawings take precedence over drawings of small scale. Should the improper materials. contractor at any time discover an error in a drawing or specification, or discrepancy between dimensions drawings 18.Contractors, Subcontractors or Suppliers shall not proceed with any a or variation on and measurements at site, or lack of dimensions or other information, it work for which he expects additional compensation beyond the written contract unless he receives written authorization from Contractor or shall be brought to the Architect's attention and shall not proceed with work affected until clarification or resolution has been made. Owner. Failure to obtain such authorization may invalidate any claim for additional compensation. 4. "Similar" means comparable characteristics for conditions noted. Contractor to verify dimensions and orientation. 19.The Contractor is to coordinate and schedule punch list to take place a minimum of 5 (five) working days before scheduled occupancy date. This for furniture installation. Provide 5. "Typical" means identical for conditions noted. will allow and phone notification to Architect and Owner when punch list items have been completed or 6. Do not scale drawings, written dimensions govern. Verify dimensions which items remain and why. Coordinate required work with Owner and protect and/or move any Owner items and furniture if needed. with field conditions prior to construction, if discrepancies are discovered between field conditions and drawings or between individual Punch list items must be completed within 30 (thirty) days of punch list drawings, contact Architect for resolution before proceeding. date. 7. Horizontal dimensions indicated are to/from finished face of 20.A "Certificate of Occupancy" shall be obtained prior to move in date and presented to owner at time of punch list walk through. construction, except as noted. 8. Vertical dimensions indicated are from top of floor slab/topping, except SHOP DRAWINGS, SAMPLES AND LITERATURE NOTES: where noted to be from above finished floor, (A.F.F.) 1. Required shop drawing submittals shall include, but not limited to the following (additional shop drawings may be required upon Architect's 9. Dimensions are not adjustable without approval of Architect unless request ) +/-, noted 1.1. Shell building requirements: 10.A11 symbols and abbreviations used on the drawings are considered to - Precast concrete (wall panels, floor plank, structural beams and columns, etc...) be construction standards. If the contractor has questions regarding symbols & abbreviations used, or their exact meaning, the Architect - Aluminum Door/Window Frames, Doors, Entrance Systems, Curtain Walls shall be notified for clarification. -Glazing CONSTRUCTION NOTES: Hollow Metal Frames, Doors, Windows Wood Doors, Frames 1. Contractors, mechanical, electrical and subcontractors shall visit the job site and become familiar with existing conditions before submitting Door/Window Hardware Roofing (membrane, built-up, metal, etc...) pricing and proceeding with any work. Steel (structural steel, miscellaneous steel, joist, deck, etc...) Metal Panels ACM panels, soffit panels, standing seam, etc..) Retaining Wal 2. All contractors and subcontractors are responsible for paying for and obtaining all their own permits as may be required by governing s Light gauge metal framing authorities. 1.2. Interior finish requirements: - Aluminum Door/Window Frames, Doors 3. All Contractors and Subcontractors are responsible for maintaining Glazing required licenses and insurances. Hollow Metal Frames, Doors, Windows Wood Doors, Frames 4. General Contractor shall be responsible for checking contract Door/Window Hardware documents, field conditions and dimensions for accuracy and confirming Millwork that work is as shown before proceeding with construction. Clarifications regarding any conflicts shall be achieved prior to related Toilet Partitions and Accessories work being started. 2. Contractor shall provide manufacturer's specifications, installation instructions, shop drawings and samples for review and approval of all 5. General Contractor to coordinate construction needs for phone, power, materials and methods to be used prior to ordering or proceeding with data, lighting, etc... with Owner prior to negotiating project cost. the work. Contact Architect prior to installation if item does not match approved shop drawings or samples. 6. General Contractor shall continuously check Architectural and Structural clearances to verify that no conflicts exist in locations of any and all mechanical, telephone, data, and 3. General Contractor shall review, add required field dimensions, stamp and forward shop drawings and samples to Architect for approval. electrical, plumbing sprinkler equipment and that all required clearances for installation and Provide sufficient copies so that Architect/Engineer may retain record maintenance of all above equipment is provided. What elements are exposed or concealed shall be determined and reviewed with Architect copy. prior to construction proceeding. The Contractor shall ensure that all 4. There shall be no substitution during bidding of materials where a pricing including duct work and conduit for systems are included. No kind be Contractor's manufacturer is specified. Where the term or equal" is used, Architect Owner determine based upon information and allowance of any will made of the negligence to note unforeseen means of installing equipment into position inside and shall equality costs submitted by Contractor structure. 5. Changes in shop drawings from design or specifications indicated must 7. Contractor shall order and schedule delivery of materials in ample time to delays in If item is found be be noted to Architect for approval. Any item clearly different than design indicated be in field avoid construction. an to unavailable, Contractor shall notify Architect immediately to allow Architect a reasonable amount of time to select an appropriate substitute. may rejected at supplier's cost even with approved shop drawings. 6. Contractor to schedule shop drawing reviews to allow 1-5 working days, 8. Materials and workmanship specified by reference to number, symbol excluding delivery time to and from the contractor, for architectural and or title of a specification such as commercial standards federal specifications, trade association standard or other similar standard, shall engineering review. comply with requirements in latest edition or revisions thereof and with TENANT IMPROVEMENT NOTES: any amendment or supplement thereto in effect on date of origin on this project's contract documents. Such standard, except as modified 1. The Building Owner shall provide to the Contractor building standards, g p g regulations and any other additional information for building standard herein, shall have full force and effect as though printed on contract documents. compliance. Contractor shall comply with all base building requirements and design criteria. 9. Only new items of recent manufacturer, of standard quality free from defects, will be permitted on the work. Rejected items shall be removed 2 Do not core drill, sleeve or cut steel members or alter any existing immediately from the work and replaced with items of the quality building framing member without Owner approval. X-rays and/or specified. Failure to remove rejected materials and equipment shall not structural analysis and design may be required at Contractor's cost. Coordinate with owner to beginning work. relieve the Contractor from their responsibility for quality and character prior of items used nor from any other obligation imposed on him by the contract. 3. Damage caused b the Contractor to the buildingsystemare to g by or its Y ( ) be repaired immediately after receiving notice. Failure to do so could 10.Make all necessary provisions for items to be furnished or installed by result in a charge to the Contractor, with the work to be completed by owner. Provide protection for these provisions until completion of the General Contractor to coordinate N.I.C. items with appropriate others. project. trades. 4. When necessary, provide and install protective covering(s) for surfaces that are subject to damage of any type. 11.Coordinate and provide appropriate structural blocking/backing and reinforcing in partitions behind all wall mounted items, including wall 5. Coordinate with Owner and Building Manager before beginning any hung owner provided items or furniture N.I.C. Coordinate with owner work that could affect the building's fire alarm, smoke evacuation or fire and plans. sprinkler system(s). 12.When any item or finish is scheduled to match existing, Supplier, Vendor 6. Patch and repair all fireproofing damaged or removed during or Subcontractor should also visit site in order to provide a perfect performance of the work. Fireproof new penetrations required by the match. Notify Architect if documents call out for an item that does not work and existing penetrations in exposed plenum areas. match installed existing conditions. 7. No space other than the construction site shall be provided for storage, 13.All finished work shall be firm well anchored, in true alignment, plumb, level, with smooth, clean, uniiorm appearance without waves, staging, finishing or for an office unless coordinated with the owner. distortions, holes, marks, cracks, stains, or discoloration. Jointings shall be tight fitting, neat and well scribed. The finish work shall not have in g, No dumping is allowed in restroom sinks, water closets or urinals. Use p g slop sinks located in the building's janitor closets where available. exposed unsightly anchors or fasteners and shall not present hazardous, Coordinate this with Owner. unsafe corners. All work shall have the provision for expansion, PLAN REVIEW FOR CODE COMPLIANCE GENERAL INFORMATION: A. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: NEW CONSTRUCTION (OFFICE/RETAIL) B. ZONING & LAND USE: P.U.D. (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) C. LOT SIZE: 2.6 ACRES / 113,931 S.F. (LOT 2 & OUTLOT A COMBINED) D. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V-B E. FULLY SPRINKLERED IN COMPLIANCE WITH MSBC CHAPTER 9 & MSFC APPLICABLE CODES: A. INTERNATIONAL BUILDING CODE (IBC) 2012 B. MINNESOTA STATE BUILDING CODE (MSBC) 2015 C. HUGO CITY CODE CURRENT D. INTERNATIONAL FIRE CODE (IFC) 2012 E. MINNESOTA STATE FIRE CODE (MSFC) 2015 F. NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE (NEC) 2014 G. INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL CODE (IMC) 2012 H. MINNESOTA MECHANICAL & FUEL GAS CODE (MSMFGC) 2015 I. ICC/ANSI A117.1 (ACCESSIBLE BUILDINGS & FACILITIES) 2009 J. MINNESOTA ACCESSIBILITY CODE 2015 K. MINNESOTA ENERGY CODE 2015 BUILDING CLASSIFICATION: A. BUILDING OCCUPANCY & CLASSIFICATION (MSBC Ch. 3 & Ch. 6): 13,879 s.f 1. OFFICE / MERCANTILE - Group B / M (13,879 s.f. / 1 Story) 2. NONSEPARATED OCCUPANCIES (MSBC 508.3) - No separation required between B & M Occupancies B. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT / ALLOWABLE AREA (MSBC Ch. 5) 1. Group B & M (Both occupancies have the same requirements per MSBC Table 503 for VB Construction Type). 2. ALLOWABLE HEIGHT (MSBC Table 503) - Group B / M = 40'-0" / 1 Story - +Sprinkler Increase (MSBC 504.2) = 60'-0" / 2 Stories 3. ALLOWABLE AREA (MSBC Table 503 & 507.3) - Group B / M = 9,000 s.f. - + Sprinkler Increase (MSBC 506.3) 300% = 27,000 s.f. FIRE -RESISTANCE - RATED CONSTRUCTION: A. BUILDING ELEMENTS (MSBC 601 & 602) 11 Element I V-B Construction Type Structural Frame 1 0 Hours Interior Bearing Walls 0 Hours Exterior Non -Bearing Wall 0 Hours Interior Non -Bearing Walls 0 Hours Floor Construction 0 Hours Roof Construction 1 0 Hours B. EXTERIOR WALL OPENINGS (MSBC 705.8) LL " U_ Ln LL o LL 0 r�6 y .J v v u, CD -1 1-1 v N v M v LL ai a ;° LL V V NN o i N 0 V M Ln 1-i A Area of Not No Not Opening IPermitted, 159/c 25° 45° 755/c Limit Req'd. C. FIRE WALLS (MSBC 706) - None Required D. FIRE BARRIERS (MSBC 707) - None Required E. FIRE PARTITIONS (MSBC 708) - None Required F. ROOF AND INTERIOR FINISH REQUIREMENTS - Minimum Roof Classification (MSBC Table 1505.1): V-B = Class C - Minimum Wall and Ceiling Finish Requirement (MSBC Table 803.9) Building Component Finish Class Exit Enclosures/ Group B/M = Class B Exit Passageways Corridors Group B/M = Class C ms GENERAL NOTE: paces I croup li/Ivl = class EXITING: A. DESIGN OCCUPANT LOAD (MSBC 1004.1) - New Office/Retail Building: To be Determined by Final Tenant Plans B. EXITS 1. Number Required (MSBC 1021.1) = 2 2. Number Accessible Required (MSBC 1007.1) = 2 3. Arrangement (MSBC 1015.2.1) Not Less Than 1/3 Diagonal 4. Travel Distance Maximums -Exit Access (MSBC 1016.2) = 300'-0"(B) / 250'-0"(M) -Common Path of Egress (MSBC 1014.3) = 100'-0"(B) / 75'-0"(M) 5. Width (The Greater of Two Conflicting Widths Shall Be Used) - Design Exit Width (MSBC 1005.3) Stairways = Not Applicable Other Components = To be Determined by Occ. Load - Stairways (MSBC 1009.4) = Not Applicable - Corridors (MSBC 1018.2) = 44" - Exit Passageways (MSBC 1023.2) = 44" - Exit Doors (MSBC 1008.1.1) = 32" Min. Clear / 48" Max. Nom. 6. Doors - Swing (MSBC 1008.1.2): Side hinged swinging in direction of egress travel at occupant load greater than 49 - Landings (MSBC 1008.1.6): Width no less than width of door or width of stair, whichever is greater, length in direction of travel not less than 44" - Thresholds (MSBC 1008.1.7): Max. Ht. = 1/2" (1:2 beveled edge If 1/4" or higher floor change) - Consecutive Doors (MSBC 1008.1.8): 48" + Door Width Apart - All swinging door hardware shall be lever type and be readily openable from the egress side without the use of a key or any special knowledge or effort (MSBC 1008.1.9) - Manually operated flush bolts and surface bolts are not permitted (MSBC 1008.1.8.4) - Fire Exit Hardware (MSBC 1008.1.10): Not Required OTHER: A. ACCESSIBILITY (IBC CHPT. 11 - 2015 Minnesota Accessibility Code) 1. Building is Accessible B. GUARDS (MSBC 1013.1) 1. 42" high min. guards shall be installed where change in levels drops 30"+ C. SAFETY GLAZING (MSBC 2406) 1. Safety glazing shall be installed in hazardous locations as specified D. ROOF ACCESS 1. Provided PLUMBING FIXTURES: A. NUMBER OF FIXTURES REQUIRED (MSBC 2902.1) -To be Determined based on Future Tenant Occupant Loads ENERGY CODE: Minnesota Energy Code - 2015 / International Energy Conservation Code - 2012 1. Climate Zone 6A 2. Opaque Thermal Envelope Requirements (C402.1.2 & C402.2) -Roof Insul. Entirely Above Deck: R-30ci -Walls Above Grade (Mass): U-0.064 -Slab-On-Grade Floors (Unheated): R-10 (for 24" below) -Opaque Doors (Swinging): U-0.37 3. Fenestration Requirements (C402.3) -Maximum Area = 30% of Wall Area -Table C402.3 Building Envelope Requirements -U-Factor: -Fixed Fenestration: 0.36 -Entrance Doors: 0.77 - SHGC: 0.40 MECHANICAL, ELECTRICAL, PLUMBING, & FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEMS SHALL BE'DESIGN-BUILD' BY EACH APPLICABLE SUBCONTRACTOR. SUBCONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE WITH G.C. & OWNER THE PROJECT SCOPE, REQUIREMENTS, & SYSTEMS TO BE DESIGNED INTO THIS PROJECT TO ACHIEVE THE DESIGN INTENT INDICATED ON THESE DRAWINGS FOR THE BUILDING. EACH APPLICABLE SUBCONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SUBMITTING THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS/APPLICATIONS TO THE GOVERNING JURISDICTION & TO PAY FOR ALL APPLICABLE FEES ASSOCIATED IN ORDER TO COMPLETE THEIR WORK ON THIS PROJECT TO MEET APPLICABLE GOVERNING CODES AND ORDINANCES. VICINITY MAP Rd. 149 ?4dIn StN Christ Lutheran Church Mr0onaId's 4 Festival Foods' + Dunn 8ro[hers Co[Tee 7 � d - Kwik Trip #454'1 P :un 471 Ht1go } maiRst Mnlrt st r FrArrc Blue Herun GHII I41 Vr _ borers Training Center Rd HealthPariners � Wagners i � Klndergarrdens GhIld North Suburban_ Center Hu Development Censer ;hill + r m i m P.A.W.S. Pei Hospital l on " 'a s` n N ,A N _ _L Prvyenee Lv, , Cr '� �n Q a C G4e$v'N&ter PhelpsRd Arm Construction 9 �n1. ; r 'y i k v eryrEe„ qv n sa a ti VICTOR PLACE PROPOSED NEW BUILDING VICTOR PATH HUGO, MINNESOTA DRAWING SCHEDULE z a tz V) O o Z) 0 o=~ N U 0 0 - Oda O U Q a zL: a m � N N O 0 0 o=~ N U Ln Oda O U Q O w or" N 11 r; C7 0f' o m Q z a LU N 00 O? U o=z N L- Ln Z O U a ❑ ISSUED FOR PRELIMINARY REVIEW ISSUED FOR PERMIT/CONSTRUCTION Q ISSUED FOR REFERENCE ONLY Q ISSUED FOR CONSTRUCTION WITH REVISED INFO. GENERAL ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ G000 PROJECT INFORMATION ARCHITECTURAL ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ A100 SITE PLAN & DETAILS ❑ ❑ ❑ A101 SITE VISIBILITY SECTIONS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ A102 SITE LIGHTING PHOTOMETRIC PLAN ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ L100 LANDSCAPE PLAN ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ A200 FLOOR PLAN ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ A300 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ A301 EXTERIOR RENDERINGS CIVIL ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C1.01 GRADING, DRAINAGE, & ESC PLAN ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C2.01 UTILITY PLAN ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C3.01 CIVIL DETAILS ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C4.01 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ C4.02 STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN A R C H I T E C T S 2145 Ford Parkway, Suite 301 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 651.690.5525 www.finn-daniels.com CONSULTANT: PROJECT: VICTOR PLACE OFFICE/RETAIL BLDG. VICTOR PATH HUGO, MN 55038 PROJECT NO.: 19025 DRAWN BY: SDB / SAW CHECKED BY: SAW ISSUES AND REVISIONS: CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION 02.06.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION- RESU BM ITTAL #1 03.05.2020 BUDGET SET 04.07.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR PLANNING COMM. 05.15.2020 SHEET TITLE: PROJECT INFORMATION SITE DATA APPLICABLE ZONING CODE: HUGO CITY CODE, CHAPTER 90 - ZONING CODE CURRENT ZONING: P.U.D. (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT) TOTAL SITE AREA: 113,931 S.F (2.6 ACRES) (LOT 2 & OUTLOT A COMBINED) BUILDING FOOTPRINT: 13,879 S.F. (12 % OF SITE) PARKING/IMPERVIOUS AREA: 38,887 S.F. (34 % OF SITE) GREEN/LANDSCAPE AREA: 61,165 S.F. (54 % OF SITE) PARKING CALCULATIONS PER SECTION 90-253: PARKING & LOADING OFFICE/RETAIL AREA: 13,879 S.F. 1/200 S.F. = 70 STALLS REQ'D TOTAL STALLS PROVIDED: 78 STALLS ACCESSIBLE STALLS: 3 STALLS REQ'D. / 3 STALLS PROVIDED STALL SIZE: 9'-0" x 20'-0"/18'-0" AISLE SIZE: 24'-0" MIN. STRIPING: 4" YELLOW STRIPES GENERAL NOTES 1. INFORMATION FOR THIS PLAN HAS BEEN DERIVED FROM AN CERTIFICATE OF SURVEY DEVELOPED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES FOR POAC-CRAIN, LLC, DATED 6/22/2009. 2. PROTECT ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY DAMAGE TO BE REPAIRED AT CONTRACTOR'S EXPENSE. 3. GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR DOCUMENTATION OF EXISTING GRADE ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AT NEW CONSTRUCTION AREAS. ANY GRADES THAT PREVENT ADEQUATE DRAINAGE AWAY FROM BUILDING AND ADJACENT PROPERTIES SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ARCHITECT PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND ORDERING OF ANY MATERIALS. 4. SLOPE ALL SURFACES AWAY FROM BUILDING AT LEAST 1/4" PER FOOT FOR SLABS AND 5/8" PER FOOT FOR PLANTING AREAS. 5. MAXIMUM SLOPE OF SIDEWALKS AND PARKING AREAS NOT TO EXCEED 1:20 FOR HANDICAP STALL AND DROP OFF ACCESS TO BUILDING PER A.D.A. COMPLIANCE. 6. PATCH AND REPAIR ALL EXISTING SIDEWALK AS REQUIRED WHERE DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION. 7. PROVIDE TEMPORARY STREET SIGNS, LIGHTING, AND ADDRESS DURING CONSTRUCTION AS REQUIRED. 8. ALL NEW CONCRETE SIDEWALKS, PATIOS, ETC. SHALL BE 4" THICK CONCRETE. SEE 6/A100. 9. ALL NEW PARKING & DRIVE AREAS SHALL HAVE BITUMINOUS SURFACE. SEE CIVIL PLANS. READ L - \ \\ A101 ROOFTOP \ SCREENING SECTION \ , NO *Aft1 \\\\ \\fy \\� / A101 ROOFTOP \\ C 3 \ \ FVTURU SCREENING SECTION E - \ CON ryTRAI�\\'• h ; NO.8 1-8-0 4 -O` PRE -FIN. \ ALUM FEN—CE-A \ PLAYGROUND � \�� � CONCRETE 3 WALK, SEE � \ / 6/6/A100, FUTURE CONNECTION TO \� FUTURE COUNTY TRAIL ? \ ILn w w A100 O i Z P w w TYP � / / / \ \ \ w w ✓ ✓ w O l l l RAP OFF/ l Z `S \ RY AREA1. t4/t I 9 S a �• FT RTU ZONE ON ROOF /FOR PARAPET TYP l � � � / � SCREENING/ 4 � � 3� Q1 SCA E Aioo U 1_ANOURE SEE TYP o 0)Ln 3 I 00 �1 �' 3 Zp',�„ A100 TYP L w w ✓ ✓ w w w 3 l7` A100 ' / I No t DCP PA I/ TYP W rr o ACCESS /� LSE 0'_8„ WETLAND � 101i SIGNAG , SEE 60'R. / W 2/A100 `g S ES 81'_p„ ACCESS AIS 135-0C E T C� g', er CONCRETE 0 ST. AL , SE / 0 ' WALK, SEE ry 15 a / Al 0, 6/A100, TYP. / 4 L w I w ✓ ✓ w w 3 3' R c N / / w$5'-0" CONC. WAL PAT - CONC. CURB `\\� / ram, / ') PER CITY— \'I C OR �OP-RQN, SEE CIVIL '' ' / _QUIREMENTS ------ - PLANS \ Q NC. CURB � / APRON, SEE-CTVIL \ / PEANS -- - - -- _ ROOFTOP SCREENING SECTION � -----�-------� Is — r --,--r -r--,- - .--T - - ROOF OP \ ! / 2 SCREE ZING SECTION A101 — 1 SITE PLAN A100 1"=30'-0" A B 1'-0"x1'_6" ALUM. SIGN BOARD W/ BLUE FIELD NO 8-0" 8'-0" 66 AND WHITE GRAPHICS/ PARKING ' LETTERING AS NOTED ACCESS MIN. AISLE SIGN POST IN CENTER z OF CONC. FILLED PIPE z Q BOLLARD. � Q a LL a LL of of O LI-I O LI-I �o>>� m 4'-0' H/ 6" DIA. CONC. m Q FILLED PAINTED PIPE Q BOLLARD IN A 24" DIA. 48" DEEP CONC. PIER NO PARKING io io NOTE: WHERE THE'NO PARKING' SIGN AT ACCESS AISLE WOULD O O OBSTRUCTA CURB RAMP OR PEDESTRIAN ROUTE-THE'NO PARKING' ---------------------------------- DESIGNATION SHALL BE PAINTED ON THE SURFACE OF THE ACCESS AISLE J iNOTE: SIGNS TO BE CENTERED ON STALL OR AISLE & LOCATED A MAXIMUM OF 96" FROM THE HEAD OF THE 2 H D C P PARKING DETAILS STALL -----AISLE — — OR -AISLE L— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — J A100 3/8" = 1'-0" FINISH GRADE BITUM. PAVING ON BASE PER CIVIL PLANS B612 CONC. CURB & GUTTER COORD. W/ CIVIL DWGS. Q � — i COMPACTED GRAN. FILL PER CIVIL PLANS NOTE: IN AREAS WHERE ADJACENT PAVEMENT SLOPES AWAY FROM GUTTER, GUTTER SLOPE SHALL BE AWAY FROM CURB 3 CURB DETAIL A100 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 4" THICK CONC. WALK BITUM. PAVING ON BASE AS NOTED 1/2" EXP. JOINT MATERIAL' B612 CONIC 'CURB & GUTTER COORD. W/ CIVIL DWGS. NOTE: IN AREAS WHERE ADJACENT PAVEMENT SLOPES AWAY FROM GUTTER, GUTTER SLOPE SHALL BE AWAY FROM CURB 4 CURB DETAIL A100 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 5 NOT USED A100 CONC. WALK W/ 6 x 6 W1.4/W1.4 WWM ON GRANULAR BASE SAW -CUT OR TOOLED CONTROL JOINT 1/4" EXPANSION JOINTS @ 20'-0" O.C. MAX. 1/2" EXPANSION JOINT MATERIAL CONTROL JOINT . 1/2" t7 6 CONC. WALK DETAILS A100 1 1/2" = 1'-0" ' 'e1s A R C H I T E C T S 2145 Ford Parkway, Suite 301 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 651.690.5525 www.finn-daniels.com CONSULTANT: PROJECT: VICTOR PLACE OFFICE/RETAIL BLDG. VICTOR PATH HUGO, MN 55038 PROJECT NO.: 19025 DRAWN BY: SDB / SAW CHECKED BY: SAW ISSUES AND REVISIONS: CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION 02.06.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION- RESU BMITTAL #1 03.05.2020 BUDGET SET 04.07.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR PLANNING COMM. 05.15.2020 SHEET TITLE: SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE VICTOR PATH AREA I PARKING AND DRIVELANE PROPOSED 1-STORY OFFICE/RETAIL BUILDING 59'-4" 1 ROOF TOP VISI BI LTY SECTION AT FRENCHMAN RD. & VICTOR PATH A101 1"=20'-0" I LANDSCAPE VICTOR PATH I _ AREA PARKING AND DRIVELANE OLn +I 0 0 SIDEWALK & LANDSCAPE AREA PROPOSED 1-STORY OFFICE/RETAIL BUILDING 69'-4" 0 00 I UTUR TRAIL R LANDSCAPE AREA N I - 2 ROOF TOP VISI BI LTY SECTION AT FRENCHMAN RD. & VICTOR PATH A101 1"=20'-0" LANDSCAPE AREA UTUR TRAIL FRENCHMAN ROAD NORTH FRENCHMAN ROAD NORTH ' 'e1s A R C H I T E C T S 2145 Ford Parkway, Suite 301 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 651.690.5525 www.finn-daniels.com CONSULTANT: PROJECT: VICTOR PLACE OFFICE/RETAIL BLDG. VICTOR PATH HUGO, MN 55038 PROJECT NO.: 19025 DRAWN BY: SDB / SAW CHECKED BY: SAW ISSUES AND REVISIONS: CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION 02.06.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION- RESU BMITTAL #1 03.05.2020 BUDGET SET 04.07.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR PLANNING COMM. 05.15.2020 SHEET TITLE: SITE VISIBILITY SECTIONS - ►Auoa�„ -..�- orrcw.ar usdxln• r i I1■ I I r. .' •ham' IY� AP EA,' • t E JG,i -=F FEATURES • Law pros• 15:a alewvin rl IH"Hilatlr wth vuflL•.ry ut 155 rllnr Wrllrans ry prong pvplLnibnz wen -is mta4 cvmmcroal and ca'r•Ptrs pxking loin wAuncg m-o 11mc -Ptic wnlrh volirtzes[anal zonn l uminnllvn rnth *Inlrnal lose. aLlnc louse -side, redunng sign[ Jr-0,ass eeucs • Veual wri[an!alnawa • CPmp,,C1 and 16Tn1yynH1"I dB�gn wan law FRA 2G Inksd km huy, yytrAt4o" -IPphk d4l.11- ai, luuh4l NI*)eh Yid tgwt,a oh Cpnl I x npilam ll ldrulP,Q phnry,.,•.,, , •: f-Phntn N%I it ti IsmeIla-l' v' Iron ?-pin wary nniv:. r . ceus mrs CONTROLTECHNOLOGY Stte't11ri:. DISTRIBUTED ••••' 1 :►►9 VNTELLIGENCE wiSCAPE Dare I I LiGA " TvnF I f+ WECT.. LATPLDG 1- RJrLATED PRODUCTS BA- OCm uli BL:La F:I�r SPECIFICATIONS CONSTRLICTIOH ELECTRICAL CONTROLS ICairrDd �r+rll,near rpm nhnC.s the hnulfw �.1l - Un-- al l7C-i7 VAG- 347-480 VAC m �i a - w15cAVE• anoUnra wr1, 1r, nxlure wl,eies, anoehox fa-r•tatlp. ke epinp aslnlryl Lui yoiLipe-SD,Y�p Hi c2Mfvl •nailule, reeiarvs dlnmFg antl . paa(nd weir and upPaomrrx, Ideal Tor • Ar -tPenl apnramrg l M .lure -iUC 10 40'G ocwwuy+onwr wn +-pin rl pl AppIWALk rs Dmrc,n have greater lnan 90'1, pnwa• radar CERT IFICATIONS • ^IsuN I1nu.1nQ wllh rlld[Wn V■rpLnl hkrd and toss man 2Dq. THU - ]7,.4'r6[•,l�rlJp'L CgnSaltum GUAIInce, I'm 'lint Ira vpilnw Top nrnl "hiRmlao, V009 • 113:' dilveri riwve dlNp:rt PgN'er pyeh4R.1•,gE, hY2n yanla Womdm Dualrhed Lanllpnntivu- 50"!; A clash errwdn GUM rd111ev armalTp+tl pr and 5hae u [ne Plerue moor to tire DLC w L%to lbr soauri • C■drovpn rgs�stnnt pie-a■x aluminum mum N OIG[lHkn Yr1dl agw NMVary' dIKJ ntleYllCehdt• al w 11 I -I n11 nl� pi0 P d tl1v •among wnh clavv*f ma balm feI>:h 11610 -211• cafta vulgc PfmaclPin devote or9Yrdah iO4A artll•f; .Iller:,Pig ANSIf . ��� oA1558 end CSA [?.T-g/25R01■ IEEF V�2.41.7 GNbgofy C Hlph nvd Sul{I■ for yrct Wations Inv 401C amllem OPTICS • enprc v a CRP••C fWPlRralcY, tv utrxc P P I.ptelnln Cllupaly Ci, Ar OJIInnrsRy Inkar dlmrra att•IInF �pl wp■n dovrce lell pWAlurei a lafger lumnpul-dace amil rpsyry.nq In arolC[Enn l4 camp�]rN]ed ' 3r Ia1W fvl ANSI rIT5.d1 hlgn a Ivwylam aPM41 ante wnllput saCnP[,flg wilbrip' p aPpllCMMlfre Pdllcnl peilblTnn <e CONTROLS - P-Au a Is IP66 -=-I • iki 18q = ar 480 mldoosvnl LEDs PIcalo wmml, a panty aerixrr and - Meets rDA /ccpmrnrndntklns uslno 3K CCT . P0001L d04(1K or 5RIX3K GRIT C(T wIIpJPtis ■ boble dm mnplele oNo" and dlmryri, zolmol cornkwbi S p deyl ekS or Ilk . 7nra upllq' l Ia d riou, vnh be 1N . 7-1 ANSI CI3EAl M3 yndlocuradd WARRANTY _ :rnld mw.kl lw bpiIr-N.er.rry1LIde aadnir rinrne lm fynM kn • ey tow timpprr �iIn,vay WsTALLAWN nholamnUaic nr wireless nerd rip modifies Icanuol acoesso4cs sold scparateyl - See •t I3i-well War.:r.lr F. • STOIX11ird srwf t? prm rrtaum, ultnlvdbl■ yrlrl , a-1QV dimming Zo, 3V3IW0IC'or csc "III,a:Ly�nn.rat Inromwllgn M 6A cam -'I [pn:Nl dNICCS ilemAkd IN dthcic m.5t • Opi unwr-q24 moun8np hlxk 101 e.� ,r-. py lend engin) - or ln5mldsper dutlng,afroM epplc2tlpn=_ yar rontr sys:gm Is ei•ai1:Ll_ LEY o4TA AY■lahle d. on Dori- a, 4t .,y 10, .q,rnre giro IorrnlJ poleti, viae9ynr" -r via 7-p.n See ordcrlhq'I>•aridon and de:, 1a Lumen Rarrpa 3:.][10-32,iC0 1 lCnuskw ar+n filLvivWo++dvalladeivr2.318' 'tow^^^"•ryup6egllgnnngtornsiResyrt -- - - Vlatwgc Range 25-22,. OD IcnPn. FMk nn pt 00 dcyvct wlm4 • N7f DlsTrbuted Inte[Ipen<-e' yvaWttle wfln d lik- a Vnbk] ■fGrC' crllL. (RClirictloAk, �n fkwl- wlreley Cpnlrol m el f-JUMS Errac cp 1;i"v ILM 118-15g 7pphrSCr17-oln vplWny} .1prmYljl ender_ Lq..,ysexrn SInIWP P+ajeIXLdlrEe {MWfs} In>a81r YMkf11A163.Ihgl '.T.5.7R(Ga-lpgl 's7k-i il" .+rr,-1- '1-1 Ail r+1, •vl.ti 4wcaw-•..r+n.i .-.� i -r-. - �,,,°Ga�� • NLI9 HELL ■4XL�arn nNN�w,nMl-4.•••+�}-+wP rr�A'nlnnr„Iy 11M--4•ior>.r�nr,,. rEATUAIRS • GecPak 5ct es cornlsrs ar ibin canpact Geomeroc Wa I•paes Nrapce in lour poovlar Anit,h� • 'NarmnIy CM• emer rdency It■ jlre far mch mctu".. IppfiL,llnie- 1 171.10,-p-1 LEDs -ILL, 3115 'urrerc •n AC and 65E I-rm I- e, rnngency made • :Ilrrriannne le ly frIPIMd Innr}11n i,rhllrrn,mn Rhwpt atn n.rtory • 5umdard Tee1Fc'fdWle Range: TCp] ACC, L)Mjonsl Healer 3q-C Id AO-C • Caro upo ldhir16uooas t" Lo= n Ll wd!� VLB24 SPECIFICATIONS CONSTRUCTION • Hal alIq I, ma ds fmm r, lo,C.Aw Men, num velh a nnod hr,f"I to fef run M Ipsla114NIq and 1nmPl9lmfloC T1,o LEI) b4l4I ann hIpwr)lniv mrl m,mv Oty II-11 55[CCI • rNq poWdgl CMl 3trindard fI11 Rne¢ plus ru5la M10F orri 5 • Wet Lmall- L15teo to 01.924 nrul U1.1598 Slafldard OPTICS "I tllyh prnYel LPJs tlal,Vwl m{f up ill a umens L+o la 119 lun+atn pet WALL . Typo IL Ilk And N 01S}rmhhans tar a mdo voly of rlpplir_a ns • xerlr up ryhlt Nq- dark eky, [IW Jhhbl ir�enclly INSTALLATION • L1nNersal alata for mou nung td atandnrd 3 la' mvd 4- stnarn nludnral it > Ap Cor1r1E[Llnrr ere tlade rmtfl Canih2LYrais al the mar of the unG • Oxona, trek(-,& AtcMoryavaua e! for sirtace rantlun.,ppYJlibn See Ss Se:: RLZ:B idles DATE _ LDCAMN [NTE PRW CATAL_pC f _' RELATED PRODUCYS Ir T?W L•wv P.F 6 Tr6r) i;.i;'.,h uti:•r C-•r"•:h ELECT Ili • RQ-777 �pnrallpri. 59160Ht • 0-DV ClmmN sliver Ian dard 10kAVjtge prQU&Ior PhLKwvll mid aeeuµrncys qn 3ptIOP5 oY011•bIR for Cprfl(11KV'Jnrorl and dimming Control • mWrgral6a%%%1(lupirnw�e: emdtge+icy RgMing fa mn roquped 9O -Route pRlk of aili InrJud•s i b'lg-li LId1Ium Iron Phaspllaly hatteFV WAI`- Ipn:tl 110:.Iy healer for„-�M 10111 rehire ®ppllUI IJI1kl LED. In e+nergenry mope vr& 6571urrlvns Emh of Ihg 4 LE)s n emefgetuy are designed to tntri" Indapfntlnnl4! In :11e rinllknry NVerd of n sx1Q1b LLD rr llluncwn sppvf;pu'1• s1+84es11nghels•d'npnns[Ir eleClriNllC58fe InCWded pZyntl nod • hdrpv[orxrnl tlutltpn■il dMHr and LED mrnyfar hatlsrylemflp2nq mode Ppfrgtion CERTIFICATIONS - Dns+gniglrs Gr,IrsnlrurmolDLL} glralRPdi IP the DLC M051 C Top ipecac pmduu quahm"am at V;y :r'r3-gWj[gx' j,rD - ❑dvom 10,86 ahri "cH nnr0innl . UL 1599 lis .j rvr Ise,n wel heab- WARRANTY • year Ipru(ad weP,Tity -se'[ W1-rIy top 241Alanal WormatlGt Gfy WA uan•n RnstpP 147t•25AI Womgv Rurpa 17.4.282 Ei'Myf'""i 95-TI5 Fplurr Pre)- dLffe#46UPI! 17tY•44$k Wclghn ohs-Ikgl '9,5-11.5"Ax-s-b •Arrvli+rn n+ma•Lc..y n .nn Mill. r leeN.,'-syckrm...awob,ewpr.•e'rn�,. HVBBELL r■ovrsnoaerr aeic m1 44-.1---..,w,s/'AIWIitl girnrk,Iprywt­n.rl•xnn �. Lighting I 1 s a 0 2 m w a.0 0.0 0.1 Q. 0.�2 0.2 -0.2 -0.2 }y2 -0, l 0.1 6.2 -0-2 -0.2 d.l 0.1 -0.1 --- 0.o 0.1 0.2 ; --0-4 _ 0.4 0.3 0.3 0,2 0.2 0"'�`=r0: 03 �D. _ 0.3 0.2 0.1 0,1 0.1 0.1 O.a 0.0 0.0 - -- _ -- ao 0.1 U 4-- -- _ 0.8 0.7 � 04 0.3 0.3 � 0.7 � .5 ).4 :8 -_l6�5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.6 6.6 -.-OA 0,0 4 1 66'=- =_- 0.1 0.1 r 60.6i l . 1 7 �l .5 'T.2 [ 0.7 0.4 0.3 0.4/ �J. r 2.8 l.T 1 3 �0 5 0.2 Fl Z Q_4 - 0.3 a.3D-2 D.1 0.1 D.D 0 0 O,fl D U n:0 ---- fl-fl 0 fll Ot7= - - 0 fJ O.D D.0 �,trl 0-1 0-2 O- 2-1 2, 2-0 i-d L-8 0-4 0,3 -r "1 0 . 8 NEi-k 1� '1 2 7 �_,s 1�jl [j3 0-1 0- 0-9 .1 p 1.1 = $ ��= D-2 0.1 0.1 D.1 0.l 0.1 D.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 O.D - Q4t_ h 0-0 D.D 2.� ;.� o.g ,a� r■ it"i MH:rk It _ '- 0.2 0.3 0� 2.1 25 1.9 i3 0.3 0.511 i.5 £3 0.? O.I: 0.0 Q.0 DO ==rT 3 ] ��i.l 2.6 3.9 •1.2 0.8 �09 0_2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.6 O.D 0.0 0-17 0.D CI.D~ 0'.Q Z` It Or 0-i 0.2 Ol4 ' .9 2.� 9 T.3 O:A O.�i•.. 1.7 I+'.$ C-� 0.0 D.a 0 0.0 O.D D.0 o.D 2.7. .3-3_G e 0.2 O.2 l0-S .7 �-0.6 _ 0.6 r 4 O.F q.l 0.1, *0. a *0. a D.D *0. a D.o a.o C MR, 10 1. 2.7 2. 1. 0- _n. - 0.2 O4 'I: �1.9 .3 a.8 U,SI OA 0. /` O.D 0.0 �0.6 00 0.4 O.D D.3. D.D 0.0 0.4 D.D o. 2-`= 0.i s ._d 1.9 �18 2.a U.3�a 0,4, 0.2 0. 0:1 D.O 0.0 D.D 0.0 C `-' .2 O.2 0.31 018 2. .6 2.0 1.4 0.9 C,� 0.41 0.4 0 + 0.0 h D,0 0.0 Q-D 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 al) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 b 0.0 D.D �i 1..4 1.8 4Z i� 05 D,2 0.2 �.-1- _ D.1 0.1 ❑.I 0,0 . C • . 1.9 ■ 2.if 1.7■ 0-'0•� ■ a r' ■ ■ ■ • ■ ■ ■ • • ■ • • a • ■ *0, D.� ice_ ■ • 1 D-1 O.a $ 2.d d 2-1 T.5 0 4 - 0.3 ,�1.1 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.a 0.0 d.0 0.0 O.a 0.0 0.0 A.0 0-D D-0 0.0 0-D 0.D 0-0 �--�,p r a4 ._ a.4 (]-3 4.2 D.2 O.2 0.1 Q.� C MH: I10 - 9 2.1 .2 2.n l.S 1- $.8 U.� �l.0 u.U. ---hO_ -D 0.0 0,0 D.0 0-o o.o 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0, Lo 0.0 0.0 0.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0-0jj rLO 0.9 0.5 §14. D-5 D.s- -0.4 0.1 { CA- i,§ 1.9■� lU ■1 41N: 14.`. -_s . . . . . . . : O.t 0.2 0 1.8 1.8 1.7 l.5 1.2 0.5 °.0 U -�� T �4-� - _ 0.0 0.4 4.0 a.D 0.0 0.0 0.0 O.0 a.a D.a 0.0 D.0 ❑A O.a fl.0 0.(>� r 1.2 1L 0.5 O. i 5 1.5 Ta --. 0.1 C M H: 70 too-�� . I ■1 : 2.4 i .g 1.5 ■1 �$ ■} •q I.4 - �r - ----,- ,'' . . , • /'---'�n.� �� .� o.q a , 2. � 2.$ z.1. 4 ❑.l D.1 a.2 .9 2.D 2 2.D t.6 1.1 ++ D.9 O:8 •D.9. '1.7 2.1 -+.C: s r-.= 1 Q,i; �D��A C>�� O.a 0.0 D.4 Q.0 O.D D.0 D.0 0.0 0.0 O.CI3.. _2.7 1. 0.6l.fl 2.9 2.8 2 (7 r 0.1 +I C 2.q 2.fy 2 $ 1.� 1. a.$ D.ly - _ �e - 1 II $ 1,I V 0.; rp.g 2. 3.; + l a-t 0.31 $ 2.n .7 2.2 1_d 1'-0 0-7 J .0.5 a.d 0-7 T-Q 3. 1.6t �.n 2: • 3 MF� 7[� - ,.�'" 1. �.n 9'' 1.l ;.yam -40� 9 _ 0.0 0.0 D.a o.', ?.9 -- 2 7A 0.7 1.4 2.9 3.1 D.� C I_ 1 QA MH: 1.0. A- .��__ ��'. I fr-' CA l.$ 2. 2.; 1.Z --�_-`1 _ @.7 la- `x_�11. 1 i. l 1-� 1 3 10 2.� 2.g 21 ]d Mi 0.7■,r -+ --f� ' 3 - } 0.6 }} 0.7 0.0: .1 I 1.4 1 0-2 2.d 9 3.3 2.3 2.b 2.9 T �. tI <' T 6 _ a 9.2 a.2 0. 8, 2, d 2.1 1.5 t.0 0.6 9. ' I I L.0-IhO;�==4.C' h WS 1.9 _�,B 2._ 0.4 0.2 C rl'1 :I 1 I 1 MN: 0 -�� + .' I �r • _ i .� 2.$I 2.7• ■1-g ; . L•, 0.� 1 0.¢1 0- / 141 2. L1"�I -g 'I .!� 2.. ; .I 2.q 1. 2.q 2.;} 3.7• 2.$ 3.3 CA ,� , 'I . 0 'I .$ 2 $ 2 L iC-t �.Ei VLAN �.1 0.2.5 .9 2.0 1.5 i.0 0-? 0.6 O.I� Cfi7 y ; .l il�ml 1 3 1.3 1.4 2.3 2Q i 2.41 1.5 l.d 2.2 2.8 3.2 3.7 �MN: 7i7c 66A a 0.8 ` 1.0 2.3-�9 -_ 1 ❑� B� 0.2 11 �- V . 0gl.fy *2.$ 2-j 1.$ 1., D.$ [ i 1-L '1 .$ 1.� '1 .1 1.¢ "1-!y '1 -7■ 1.9 2.� 2.1 2. 11 t..� 1.,$ 1-$ 2.� 3.7� 3.L 3.$ _.� MR:'I.� 1.� 2.§ �3.�} 1. l 0.2 5 �H, 2.1 l.7 1.2 �F0.- __ 0,9 l.D 1.3 1.5 1.6 1,7 1.7 1.7 1.8 2.D 23 2.5 ] 1.4 Ir 1.0 i 1,2 1.8 2.6 3.0 3.1 3.4 •i._5 1.1 1.5 3.4 _.C] U. i 0.1 � ` 1 , t _ r • , t •'1.y� 1.?■ 'T, 1.1 l.(� 1.% 1.9 1.9■ 2-j 2.1 2.� 2.4 } 2.(� 2.4 2.j .- . • J r • 1.� 2,� 2.� 2.4 2.¢ 2.$ 2. l.$ 1.� i.7• 3.7•`-_ 3 ` 2 D-2 D-3` q�$ 2-3 .7 2.3 2-0 1.7 t s l.3 1-d t-S 1.$ 2-D 1.9 2.t 2.3 2-3 j 2-d 2-5 E_ Zj�-- 2-t.=- 1�-^ D_ D-7 �Z7- r-_1=£ - 12-4 it 2-d 2.5 2-5 2-2 2.4 l.$ 1.5 2-2 3-S 31-�G-6 C.2 0.1 : ■ ti ■ 1.$ 2.� 2. 2.1 1.; 1.7 i.; 2-1 2.1 2.Z� -�%- - 2 2�4 �2.J� 12-1 }12. II i'$ ;1_i_ .. P'$ n j i2'. 2,7. -f 2-� 1 2.g 2-$ 1 0.1 6.3 1 0. 2. 7 2.5 2.3 2.2 2.0 ;,9 2.0 2.1 2.3 2. 2 1 2 7 2.7 2.7 2.3 1 2.0 I 1.7 i _j= 0.8 _ 0.5 0. i 1.5 1 2 A 2.6 1 2.7� - 2:7 2. 2-A 2.] 1.5 1.4 1.7 1?i��. 0.2 i' _A 1 Z 2 4 4 -- - } I I $ I 4 L 4 4 _ 1. , 2.7• r 2� 2/ 2.� 2.¢ 2.� -- L T Q p% � �_ I $ tit 1.� 2. 2, 2. 2. 2. 12. } 2.7 12. 2. 1 2. I 2. } 2. I 1.� }- ti--3:�'" _ �' a I r .1 0,1 0.2 0.7 • 1, a 2.1 2.2 2.5 2.G - 2.5 [ 2.7 } 2.7 i 2,7 [ 2.7 1 1211 2.1`j 2. _ 1�9. _: .2 - _ 1 2=__ D,8- 7 0:6 -~ '0.4 - - 0.2 - el, s 3.?��15 __ 1:T T.$ -.._ _ _- 1�9 �0 .4 r2.7 2.b 2.1 2 _ 0.8 0.7 Ck7 0.1 0.1 v '0. *0. i. 1:Q 1• -i:'' 1.7i ` 2'Z 2-� 2. 21,`�.�.Q 1.1=A���'r'g - �i - - tl '+r •-..'`�+-�c-l.-...¢'�.� • 1. a->:�-_...-�0?�`� f ' D 0.1 O.f D: t, fly 1.3 1.7 2.3 2.8 •7 .2 ili7 iiiit1.7_� a� r�3---T.1 0.8~ .U.6 0-° U.i -4. 3 U:z =0-I 0-1 3,I [-? 03 0-4 D.7 1.0 D$-i``_=1:3_. 1+9 1,7 .D 0.4 (7.2 0.11 h MH: 20 ■-0 • - - - -� _ = -.� at- o-7,r� '0-4 A .1 0,3 7 a.8 1.7 1,8- 2� 1.0 0.6 ; ` }-3 D.2 0.2 0.2 0.2_-- - _a -_ _-= c-2 c.1 o.T �0--7_ L-- _-_-0.1 a. 0.2 0.3 05 p5 D.5 �05--- ' 45 0.3 0.2 0.1 6.1 astir+. 0.0 {�3 0.-0 D 5 - _ _¢fi- - �. _* -D 5 0,5 Q.5 0.3 4.2= = =t31 0.1 Q-1 ! D.1 0.1 0.2 3.1 � .1 fl. l 0.1 0.1 n. } Q. i 0.1 0.1 Q.2 0.3 D 2 b.-2 ~ 0.2 Q 1 _0.1 0.1 0.1-� 0.0 QO g 0.0 0.0 0.a 0.1 0.1 14`L` 0.2 2 0.2 - o-2 - -.- 0,2 0.3 a-2 0.2 0.2 0A a.1-�-$T OJ 0.1 0, 0,1 ' .1 0. T © l 0.1 0.1 0.1 0J _ a.1 0A 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1. 0,0 '0.0' b:9 o.o' D.a .- J ` . ■ .-�-`.- l , ;qi3- 'D.a 0.0 0.1 D.1 O1 1 --010.1 0.1 0.i a.i 0.11~- D.i��- 0 0.0 0-D o.0 `Un D.0 �o�i3.D 0.l1 a.1 D,_�-tiT`J 0.1 0.I 0.2 O.} 0.2 0.1 a.l a.l 0.1 [ 0.1 0.1 _ 'yam- -���� --0:5 D-CF _-1 - D.D 0.a 0.0 _D1 _-=6i 0.1 D.i o.l a.1 O.i Ok - D.t 0.t 0.1 �a.l_ _o_ oD - o.Q- -4A- -0.0 0.0 0.1 -CI1--- 0.1 O4 o.D 0.0 CfT 01 0.0 0.0 9.1 • -0 0.0 0.0 - o.o o.o~l o.a o.o O.a o-0 0.1_�-1- o.t a.o C.o 0.0 -o.t o.t 0.1 Calculation Summary Label CalcType Units Avq Max Min Avg/Min Max/Min PARKING LOT Illuminance Fc 1.71 3.8 0.1 17.10 38.00 SITE Illuminance Fc 0.75 6.7 0.0 N.A. N.A. 1. Standard Reflectance of 80/50/20 unless noted otherwise 2. Not a Construction Document, for Design purposes only 3. Standard indoor calc points @ 30" A.F.F. unless noted otherwise 4. Standard outdoor calc points @ Grade unless noted otherwise 5. Mlazgar Associates assumes no responsibility for installed light levels due to field conditions, etc. 1 SITE PLAN - LIGHTING PHOTOM ETRICS A102 N.T.S. Luminalre Schedule Symbol Qty_ CJ 20 El 5 --F] 1 ❑ascription TRP 1-12L 15-4K7-4 RA.R 1-160L-100-4K7-4_W RAR-1-160L-100-4K7-4W-BC Arrangement SINGLE SINGLE SINGLE Label Lum. Lumens Lum. Watts LLF OA 1550 13.9 11885 90 7371 90 0.900 0.900 0.900 OB OB BC P,a Q co ly LO � 0 ❑ U ♦0 C1 I 00 - c Q Q 1 00 Q Cn v a Q 0, N N Y � � Revisions A ti a U W o L ❑ t 0 O LLJ U Z 00 V ::D Page M of 1 N ' 'e1s A R C H I T E C T S 2145 Ford Parkway, Suite 301 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 651.690.5525 www.finn-daniels.com CONSULTANT: MLAZGAR A 5 5 0 C I A T E 5 PROJECT: VICTOR PLACE OFFICE/RETAIL BLDG. VICTOR PATH HUGO, MN 55038 PROJECT NO.: 19025 DRAWN BY: SDB / SAW CHECKED BY: SAW ISSUES AND REVISIONS: CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION 02.06.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION- RESU BMITTAL #1 03.05.2020 BUDGET SET 04.07.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR PLANNING COMM. 05.15.2020 SHEET TITLE: LIGHTING / PHOTOMETRICS SITE PLAN Al 02 LANDSCAPE SCHEDULE SYMBOL ABBR. SIZE QTY. SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME DECIDUOUS TREES Q ABM 2 1/2" BB 6 ACER X FREEMANII JEFFERSRED' AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE NPO 2 1/2" BB 7 QUERCUS NORTHERN ELLIPSOIDALIS PIN OAK CRATAEGUS CRIMSON CLOUD CCH 2" BB 3 LAEVIGATA HAWTHORN 'CRIMSON CLOUD' BETULA RVB 2 BB 4 NIGRA RIVER BIRCH CONIFEROUS TREES CSP 6' BB 7 PINUS CEMBRA CHALET SWISS CHALET' STONE PINE PICEA GLAUCA BLACK HILLS 0 BHS 6' BB 3 DENSATA SPRUCE DECIDUOUS SHRUBS EUONYMUS O CBB #3 / 18" H. 8 ALATUS COMPACT BURNING COM PACTA' BUSH PHYSOCARPUS 0 SIPS #3 / 18" H. 15 OPULIFOLIUS SUMMERWINE PODARAS' NINEBARK CONIFEROUS SHRUBS THUJA OCCIDENTALIS HOLMSTRUP ((IT>% ETH #10 CONT. 15 'HOLMSTRUP' ARBORVITAE ADJ #3 / 18" H. 14 JUNIPERUS 'ANDORA ANODORA JUNIPER COMPACT' PERENNIALS O RRD #3 CONT. 20 HEMEROCALLIS'ROSY RETURNS' ROSY RETURNS DAYLILY CALAMGOSTIS X O KFG #5 CONT. 21 ACUTIFLORA FEATHER REED GRASS KARL FOERSTER' O PHS #3 CONT. 20 HOSTA SUM AND SUBSTANCE HOSTA SUM AND SUBSTANCE' LAVANDULA HIDCOTE BLUE O PLH #3 CONT. 10 ANGUSTIFOLIA LAVENDER HIDCOTE BLUE' EXISTING LANDSCAPE / TREES EXISTING TREE / LANDSCAPE ON ADJACENT PROPERTY 44 CITY OF HUGO CITY CODE SECTION 90-181 LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS: 1 OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREE FOR EVERY 100 FEET OF SITE PERIMETER: (1291 LF/100 = 13) 13 overstory deciduous trees provided (includes blvd. trees) 1 CONIFIROUS TREE FOR EVERY 200 FEET OF SITE PERIMETER: (1291 LF/200 = 7) • 7 conifirous trees provided 1 ORNAMENTAL TREE FOR EVERY 200 FEET OF SITE PERIMETER: (1291 LF / 200 = 7) 7 ornamental trees provided 1 SHRUB FOR EVERY 300 SQUARE FEET OF BLDG.: (13879 SF/300 = 47) • 52 shrubs provided 18" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL. 11/2" WIDE STRAP TYP.) DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE - 3' @ 120" INTERVAL (TYP.) TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH TURNBUCKLE WITH DOUBLE STRAND #14 GAUGE WIRE - 3 PER TREE FINAL GRADE OF PLANT TO EQUAL ORIGINAL GRADE 4"- 6" LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD 8' STEEL STAKE MULCH IN SAUCER- EXTEND PAST STAKE 2" x 2" x 30" STAKES SET 120" APART OUTSIDE THE BALL AT ANGLE - 3 PER TREE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL MAINTAIN PEDESTAL OF UNDISTURBED SOIL F NOTES:- - - - - - - --- 1. TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE SHOWN. 1 ` 2. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TOSTAKE I TREES: HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR S RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE I GUARANTEE PERIOD. I 3. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR I L TO PLANTING_ ,,I 8'STEEL SI 18" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE (40 MIL. 1 1/2" WIDE STRAP TYP.) DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE - 3' @ 120" INTERVAL (TYP.) TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH TURNBUCKLE WITH DOUBLE STRAND #14 GAUGE WIRE - 3 PER TREE FINAL GRADE OF PLANT TO EQUAL ORIGINAL GRADE 4"-6" LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH IN SAUCER - EXTEND PAST STAKE 2" x 2" x 30" STAKES SET 120" APART OUTSIDE THE BALL AT ANGLE - 3 PER TREE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL MAINTAIN PEDESTAL OF UNDISTURBED SOIL NOTES: — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1. TWO ALTERNATE METHODS OF TREE STAKING ARE SHOWN. 2. IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S OPTION TO STAKE TREES: HOWEVER, THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE MAINTAINING TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE GUARANTEE PERIOD. 3. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. 4. CONIFER TO HAVE SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 5 NO MULCH TO BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. - J - - - - - - - - - - - - - 2 TREE PLANTING DETAILS L100 NTS 1 SITE PLAN L100 1"=30'-0" \ EN tv �, qD \ \ lvoffirN N CSP4 �O-8) NPO W W -P \ \ \ SOD BB ETH 3 \ W W 3 NPO ABM CBB \\ �\ CCH ETH 3 CBB \ ETH 3 PLANTING BED SOD CBB PRQP �� ETH 3 SOD I / O u i OFF / / � / � � CBB ETH 3 \\\\ R ! w w I I 11 CFjR�T `��OR A / PLANTING BED, / 133 fl D/ i O �C� c N� N PIO 1 ♦� / / � J T NPO KFG(6) BHS �- RRD(6) S PHL W W W w ABM WETLANDW PLANTING RVB RRD(5) 3 I BED �O BHS PLANTING BED W w w w K G 5 PLANTING CSP PHS( ) BED 3 HS SPS(3) CSP ADJ 2 KFG 3 - CSP RV — _ — RRD 7 _ \ \ ADJ 2 SOD-----,_ RVB CCH _ ED / ADJ 3 -- _ ------ SIPS ° " SPS 3 ♦ sa -yea / ....1 SOD NPO NPO � �SC�D � a° NPO _ - - _ ABM ABM _ , \ OR PATH 4"- 6" LAYER OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH IN SAUCER - EXTEND PAST STAKE FINAL GRADE OF PLANT TO EQUAL ORIGINAL GRADE CENTERING OF SHRUB IN BED TO TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER DIMENSION FROM EDGE BACKFILL WITH PLANTING SOIL MAINTAIN PEDESTAL OF UNDISTURBED I SOIL fES: HAND LOOSEN ROOTS OF CONTAINERIZED MATERIAL TYPICAL. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING. 3 SHRUB PLANTING DETAIL L100 NTS I II GENERAL NOTES 1. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT THE SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING A BID TO BECOME FAMILIAR WITH THE SITE CONDITIONS. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES LOCATED PRIOR TO ANY DIGGING. 2. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. IF THERE IS ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE NUMBER OF PLANTS ON THE LIST AND THE NUMBER SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 3. THE GROUND COVER IS SOD EXCEPT IN PLANTING BEDS. 4. ALL PLANTING AREAS SHALL BE EDGED WITH 6" BLACK VINYL EDGING AND HAVE 4"-6" DEEP MULCH PLACED OVER A WEED BARRIER FABRIC. PLANTING AREAS ADJACENT TO THE BUILDING AND WITHIN PARKING LOT ISLANDS SHALL HAVE ROCK MULCH. ROCK MULCH SIZE AND TYPE SHALL BE 3/4" to 1 1/2" RIVER ROCK STONE ROCK MULCH. ALL OTHER PLANTING AREAS SHALL HAVE BROWN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. ALL TREES NOT PLACED WITHIN A PLANTING BED SHALL HAVE A 4 FOOT DIAMETER, 6 INCH DEEP BROWN SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH DISH INSTALLED AROUND THE TREE - REFER TO DETAILS. 5. ALL RETAINING WALLS TO BE DESIGNED BY OTHERS. 6. ALL AREAS WITHIN THE PROPERTY THAT ARE NOT SHRUB BEDS OR HARD SURFACED EXCEPT AS NOTED SHALL BE SODDED. ALL AREAS OUTSIDE THE PROPERTY LINES DISTURBED BY GRADING OR UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL BE RETURNED TO EXISTING CONDITION OR BETTER, OR AS NOTED. 7. SHOULD A PLANT BE UNAVAILABLE AT THE TIME OF INSTALLATION, ALL SUBSTITUTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO THE APPROVAL OF THE OWNER & CITY. 8. ANY EXISTING VEGETATION TO BE REMOVED FROM THE SITE SHALL BE DISPOSED OF IN A MANNER THAT IS APPLICABLE WITH CITY AND STATE REQUIREMENTS. 9. EXISTING PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE ALL VEGETATION, BRUSH AND DEBRIS CLEARED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON THESE PLANS. 10. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES AND SHRUBS TO REMAIN DURING DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION. 11. SEE ENGINEERS GRADING AND UTILITY PLANS FOR EXACT LOCATIONS OF BERMS, FENCES, RETAINING WALLS AND PIPE LOCATIONS. 12. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY MECHANICAL ROOM LOCATION AS SOURCE OF ELECTRIC AND WATER SUPPLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ROUTING OF SUBWATER AND IRRIGATION CONTROL WIRING FROM MECH. ROOM TO FRONT OF BUILDING. 13. AN IRRIGATION SYSTEM SHALL BE INSTALLED TO COVER ALL SOD, SHRUB AND TREE AREAS. THE IRRIGATION SYSTEM WILL BE DESIGNED BY THE CONTRACTOR CHOSEN TO DO THE WORK. A DESIGN DRAWING IS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE CONTRACTOR. SHOWING LOCATIONS, SIZES AND KINDS OF EQUIPMENT TO BE INSTALLED. 14. FINAL ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE CONTINGENT UPON THE COMPLETION OF THE PROJECT. A DEMONSTRATION OF THE SYSTEM SHALL BE PROVIDED TO THE OWNER. ANY ADJUSTMENT TO HEADS SHALL BE MADE PRIOR TO THE DEMONSTRATION. 15. OPERATING AND MAINTENANCE MANUALS SHALL BE SUBMITTED AND THE OWNERS PERSONNEL SHALL BE INSTRUCTED IN THE USE AND MAINTENANCE OF THE SPRINKLER SYSTEM. 16. ALL PLANTS SHALL BE GUARANTEED BY THE CONTRACTOR FOR ONE YEAR AFTER TOTAL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE. &M &IMAL0 A R C H I T E C T S 2145 Ford Parkway, Suite 301 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 651.690.5525 www.finn-daniels.com CONSULTANT: PROJECT: VICTOR PLACE OFFICE/RETAIL BLDG. VICTOR PATH HUGO, MN 55038 PROJECT NO.: 19025 DRAWN BY: SDB / SAW CHECKED BY: SAW ISSUES AND REVISIONS: CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION 02.06.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION- RESU BMITTAL #1 03.05.2020 BUDGET SET 04.07.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR PLANNING COMM. 05.15.2020 SHEET TITLE: SCHEMATIC SITE PLAN Ll 00 2 A300 221'-4" 4'-0" 16'-8" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 16'-8" 4'-0" LINE OF CANOPY/ROOF 4'-0" H. PRE -FIN. ABOVE, TYP. ALUM. FENCE q O O O O O O O O O O q BUILDING UTILITY _ ROOM in in 00 10'-0" 4 A300 � o o O FUTURE TENANT O O O O O PALYG OUND AREA an O O O O 3 1D oo `I A300 O o O N i F, O O O O O O q FF o LINE OF o q O O O O O O ABOVE, TYP. 4'-0" 16'-8" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 18'-0" 4'-0" 16'-8" 4'-0" 4'-0" H. PRE -FIN. ALUM. FENCE LINE OF CANOPY/ROOF ABOVE, TYP. 112'-8" 108'-8" 221'-4" 1 A300 1 FLOOR PLAN A200 1/8"=1'-0" • • e A R C H I T E C T S 2145 Ford Parkway, Suite 301 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 651.690.5525 www.finn-daniels.com CONSULTANT: PROJECT: VICTOR PLACE OFFICE/RETAIL BLDG. VICTOR PATH HUGO, MN 55038 PROJECT NO.: 19025 DRAWN BY: SDB / SAW CHECKED BY: SAW ISSUES AND REVISIONS: CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION 02.06.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION- RESUBMITTAL #1 03.05.2020 BUDGET SET 04.07.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR PLANNING COMM. 05.15.2020 SHEET TITLE: FLOOR PLAN WALL SIGNGE CALCULATION 4,183 S.F. WALL AREA x 0.10 = 418 S.F. 1 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 418 S.F OF WALL SIGNAGE PERMITTED (SOUTH ELEVATION) A300 1/8"=1'-0" 01 WALL SIGNGE CALCULATION 3,950 S.F. WALL AREA x 0.10 = 395 S.F. 2 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION 395 S.F OF WALL SIGNAGE PERMITTED (NORTH ELEVATION) A300 1/8"=1'-0" 3 EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION A300 1/8"=1'-0" r4 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION A300 1/8"=1'-0" EXTERIOR MATERIAL SCHEDULE DESCRIPTION STYLE / COLOR MANUFACTURER / SUPPLIER STONE CULTURED STONE VENEER CHARDONNAY SOUTHERN LEDGESTONE BORAL CULTERED STONE EIFSA EXTERIOR INSULATED FINISH SYSTEM OYSTER SHELL#456 SANDPEBBLE TEXTURE DRYVIT OUTSULATION MD OR EQUAL EIFS B EXTERIOR INSULATED FINISH SYSTEM BAVARIAN WOOD #448 SANDPEBBLE TEXTURE DRYVIT OUTSULATION MD OR EQUAL SIDING FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING SHERWIN WILLIAMS #7538 'TAMARIND' 8" SMOOTH LAP SIDING (JAMES HARDIE OR EQUAL) METAL PREFINISHED METAL CAP/FLASHING MEDIUM BRONZE ANODIZED UNA-CLAD OR EQUAL ROOF ASPHALT SHINGLES GAF TIMBERLINE PRESTIQUE LIFETIME WEATHERED WOOD GAF TIMBERLINE GLAZ ALUMINUM /GLASS STOREFRONT MEDIUM BRONZE ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT W/ 1" TINTED INSULATED GLAZING T.B.D. • • e A R C H I T E C T S 2145 Ford Parkway, Suite 301 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 651.690.5525 www.finn-daniels.com CONSULTANT: PROJECT: VICTOR PLACE OFFICE/RETAIL BLDG. VICTOR PATH HUGO, MN 55038 PROJECT NO.: 19025 DRAWN BY: SDB / SAW CHECKED BY: SAW ISSUES AND REVISIONS: CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION 02.06.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION- RESUBMITTAL #1 03.0S.2020 BUDGET SET 04.07.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR PLANNING COMM. 05.1S.2020 SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS • • dftnilels A R C H I T E C T S 2145 Ford Parkway, Suite 301 Saint Paul, Minnesota 55116 651.690.5525 www.finn-daniels.com CONSULTANT: PROJECT: VICTOR PLACE OFFICE/RETAIL BLDG. VICTOR PATH HUGO, MN 55038 PROJECT NO.: 19025 DRAWN BY: SDB / SAW CHECKED BY: SAW ISSUES AND REVISIONS: CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION 02.06.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION- RESUBMITTAL #1 03.05.2020 BUDGET SET 04.07.2020 CITY OF HUGO SITE PLAN APPLICATION FOR PLANNING COMM. 05.15.2020 SHEET TITLE: EXTERIOR RENDERINGS s \ 920.68 WA/ I ` 920.98 7 \ U I rn I I OUT I I / 912.7 W I 1�1 � \ J13.5 I /J HYDR --1 I I I I I I I I I I I I f I I I ENTRANCE _ 1914 - - - - / I 14 80 TC, 1 .30 G PROPOSED BUILDING FFE=915.00 14 UO FLUSH ULl MAN 1 \ v 921.58 \ O0 1 D 921.62 921.46 O .90 914 S 13.00 2' WIDE CURB V -DRAIN OPENING O, ate° I, J I VKI"I JCVVCK IIVLC I J 1 171M I VV1LL KCl mvc KUIV-Vrr UT lT , 9 9jl/— 0 DURING SITE CONSTRUCTION. LEAVE IN -PLACE `— — 1 A 1 I 1 I , TRANSITION CURB HEIGHT FROM 6" TO 0'� 14.90 TIC 14.70 G 14.80 FLUSH UNTIL SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. (TYP) I I \ I 14.90 TC 14.40 G 0 5 10 V 1 INCH = 10 FEET (THIS DETAIL ONLY) %TP.�OMOSEQ ENTRAN (SAWC(3T)-8LR LAC,€ W/ CONCRETE CROSS-G_Ufr� gY_P) -912 GENERAL NOTES THE INFORMATION SHOWN ON THESE DRAWINGS CONCERNING TYPE AND LOCATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES IS NOT GUARANTEED TO BE ACCURATE OR ALL INCLUSIVE. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAKING HIS OWN DETERMINATION AS TO TYPE AND LOCATION OF UTILITIES AS NECESSARY TO AVOID DAMAGE TO THESE UTILITIES. CALL "811" FOR EXISTING UTILITIES LOCATIONS PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATIONS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND WATER MAIN AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO THE START OF INSTALLATIONS. INSTALLATIONS SHALL CONFORM TO THE CITY STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS AND DETAIL PLATES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY CITY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT A MINIMUM OF 24 HOURS PRIOR TO THE INTERRUPTION OF ANY SEWER OR WATER SERVICES TO EXISTING HOMES OR BUSINESSES. STORAGE OF MATERIALS OR EQUIPMENT SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED ON PUBLIC STREETS OR WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY. NOTIFY CITY A MINIMUM OF 48 HOURS PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION. ALL ELECTRIC, TELEPHONE, AND GAS EXTENSIONS INCLUDING SERVICE LINES SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED TO THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY SPECIFICATIONS. ALL UTILITY DISCONNECTIONS SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE UTILITY COMPANY. CURB & BITUMINOUS NOTES REMOVAL AND DISPOSAL OF EXISTING STREET MATERIALS AS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION IS CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL. SAW -CUT EXISTING BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE CURB TO PROVIDE BUTT -JOINT. RESTORE DISTURBED STREET TO EXISTING OR BETTER SECTION. BACKFILLING OF CURB IS INCIDENTAL TO CURB INSTALLATION. FOUR INCHES OF CLASS 5 UNDER CURB IS INCIDENTAL TO CURB INSTALLATION. CURB ENDS SHALL TERMINATE IN A THREE-FOOT BEAVER TAIL. LEGEND DENOTES EXISTING CATCH BASIN 14 DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER APRON OD DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES EXISTING HYDRANT M DENOTES EXISTING WATER VALVE —_ 5 I `x DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS 952.36 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION > DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER >> DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE Q PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE ❑ PROPOSED CATCH BASIN 87� PROPOSED CONTOUR 0876.25 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (GUTTERLINE, BITUMINOUS SURFACE, OR GROUND SURFACE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED) s PROPOSED SILT FENCE ­z:j4.0% PROPOSED DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE 0 PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION GRAPHIC SCALE Know what's below. Call before you dig. 120 TRAN CURB HEIGHT FROM 6" TO 0" NORTH ( IN FEET ) 1 INCH = 30 FT (22" x 34") \ O 04D / CBMH 6 (27" 0) ��� NEENAH R-4342 RE 913.00 r IE 0 >\ 00 \ @ 0.'o % PROPOSED4� UI DING ��> CBMH 5 OV_i4! NEENAH R-4342 13,$7 . F. RE 913.00 FFE = 915.0 IE 909.80 OU TL 0 T w — 3 w EX. HYDRANT & ,I 7i. VALVE WET—­`­***� �o _I -I I —I 7 —7 CB 2 (2'X3') NEENAH R-3067-V RE 912.10 IE 909.10 HpDE @ 0 60 10 -6 PVC CH 40 ' @ .00% EXTEND SAN SEWER, WATER, AND ROOF DRAIN LEADS INTO BLDG AT LOCATIONS DETERMINED BY OWNER "\ \ END IE: 906.0 �\ (COORD. W/ MECH) Y \�T2 ROOF DRAIN LEAD 55'-8" PVC @ 2.00% INSTALL SALVAGED HYDRANT & NEW GATE VALVE 64'-6" PVC 0 0 c/ SCH 40 @ 3.00% OEcy oM j jc E 909.20 / 6"DPWM I 1 H 3 (48 0 I — NE AH R-3067-V SAN. C/ 6' X6" T E RE 12.9 > 8 RE 12.85 > IE 908.L IE 9 4.1f < L --EX. 27" S OR 73' - 15" HDPE @ 0.75% STUB I� I 1 — I I � E-wtA.I A i VICTOR CONNECT TO EXIST. SAN SEER —/ W/ 6" PVC SCH 40 SERVICE STUB - IE: 899.10 & ADD 4.5' RISER (FIELD VERIFY) REMOVE & SALVAGE EXIST HYDRANT & CONNECT TO EXISTING 6" STUB I I @ 0 34°/0 HpPE 15L I ��� I I I Fk•�?\ � / E 8" PPVC � LOT BL OCK FX \ . 15" STRM � ° pV � REMOVE BULKHEAD ---& _QO N N E CT TO EXIST. STUBS i CBMH 1 (48" 0) NEW CB NEENAH R-3067-V RE 912.30 IE 908.00 (W) IE 908.80 (N) \ IE 908.25 (E) \ IE 906.77 (S) (FIELD VERIFY) \ \ C STORM SEWER NOTES FIELD VERIFY SIZE, ELEVATION, AND LOCATION OF EXISTING STORM SEWER AND NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. WHEN CALLED OUT AS PIPE, STORM SEWER SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP) ANSI C76 WITH R-4 GASKETS OR, IF ALLOWED BY CITY, HDPE PIPE MAY BE USED. (SEE PLAN FOR LOCATIONS WHERE RCP IS REQUIRED.) HDPE PIPE SHALL MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF AASHTO M294, TYPE S WITH WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS. USE SAND/GRANULAR MATERIAL FOR BACKFILLING AND COMPACTION OF HDPE/PVC PIPE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM 2321. STORM SEWER LENGTHS INCLUDE THE LAYING LENGTH OF THE FLARED -END SECTION. LAYING LENGTH OF APRON TO BE DEDUCTED FROM PAYMENT LENGTH OF PIPE. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.2820. STORM SEWER PIPES TO BE JOINED TO THE CATCH BASIN MANHOLES W/ APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS TO MAKE THEM GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. CEMENT MORTAR JOINTS ARE PERMITTED ONLY FOR REPAIRS AND CONNECTIONS OF EXISTING LINES CONSTRUCTED WITH SUCH JOINTS. WATER MAIN NOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN LOCATION AND SIZE SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. PROVIDE PIPE INSULATION WHERE SEWER (SANITARY OR STORM) CROSSES WITHIN 18" OF WATER MAIN. PROPOSED WATER MAIN SHALL BE 6" DIP CL 52. MECHANICAL JOINTS SHALL BE USED FOR WATER MAIN PIPES 4" IN DIAMETER AND LARGER. RUBBER GASKETS SHALL CONFORM TO AWWA C111 (ANSI A21.11). MAINTAIN MINIMUM 8-FT COVER TO TOP OF ALL WATER MAIN PIPE. ALL COMPONENTS OF THE WATER SYSTEM, UP TO THE WATER METER OR FIRE SERVICE EQUIPMENT, SHALL UTILIZE PROTECTIVE INTERNAL COATINGS MEETING CURRENT ANSI/AWWA STANDARDS FOR CEMENT MORTAR LINING OR SPECIAL COATINGS. SANITARY SEWER NOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER LOCATION, SIZE, AND ELEVATION SHALL BE VERIFIED IN THE FIELD PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE PVC SCHEDULE 40. LEGEND e DENOTES EXISTING CATCH BASIN 4 DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER APRON DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER MANHOLE DENOTES EXISTING HYDRANT N DENOTES EXISTING WATER VALVE -' DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS x 952.36 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION > DENOTES EXISTING SANITARY SEWER DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING WATER MAIN 0 PROPOSED STORM SEWER PIPE Q PROPOSED STORM MANHOLE ❑ PROPOSED CATCH BASIN _8768— PROPOSED CONTOUR X 876.25 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION (GUTTERLINE, BITUMINOUS SURFACE, OR GROUND SURFACE UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED) s PROPOSED SILT FENCE PROPOSED DIRECTION OF DRAINAGE 0 PROPOSED INLET PROTECTION GRAPHIC SCALE -20 0 10 20 40 Know what's below. Call before you dig. SITE PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PHONE: (651) 361-8210 FAX: (651) 361-8701 0 N 0 N CD 0 N 0 bi Q 0 Z Z a)00 N � O � o O z m O U U > > Q Q m � � o Y w (1) o 0 o = U w �L) w 0) U o o 0 N N w ZON 3 L0 - L0 < 0 < co 0 N M It LO (O Z W (D o - U � ~ m < <0JWW > Z Z z N CL g < (D C = w < w 2 F_ 0 — J Z J < < < = =OH F- UHU)U w 0 w w o C V F_ <OH J W N >ZOfLL wCOOap z L0 U p — ED LU U' > OfaWZ� Qi wwELww I— W H LU U of U�z U) ^ O ? LLUU � Q Z 0Uli z U_Xv } o �X LL 0 X Q n 7 NORTH ( IN FEET ) 1 INCH = 20 FT (22" x 34") SHEET C2.01 �10s II I II °jR�t1l ti%,� 2 o•d� `" a Q Gf�,��R rpVj L II'��Q o ob I HC>• 4' 2" WASHED COARSE AGGREGATE 6"MIN.DEP'TH NOTES; 1. CRUSHED CONCRETE NOTALLOWED. 2. LENGTH AND WIDTH SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY ENGINEER 3. FABRIC REQUIRED UNDER ROCK FOR DRIVEWAYS LARGER THAN 24 FEET, HEAVY TRAFFIC, OR AS DIfiECTED BY THE ENGINEER. PLATE N0. HU-EC-1 REVISION HUGO DATE _ APRIL Z015 ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE A) Installation WIRE FENCING POST SET POSTS AND EXCAVATE 6"X 67RENCH TRENCH 6`X 6' THE LINE OPE OF THE POSTS LINE OF THE P057S FILTER FABRIC �I 3 ATTACH THE FILTER FABRIC TO THE WIRE FENCING AND THE TRENCH BOTTOM OF DRAINAGE WAY 0 COMPACTED BACKFILL 2 STAPLE THE WIRE MESH FENCING TO EACH POST 4 BACKFILL THE TRENCH AND COMPACT THE EXCAVATED SOIL A A4"000" A ELEVATION: POINTS 'A" SHOULD BE HIGHER THAN POINT "B' B) Maintenance 1. FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING PROLONGED RAINFALL. ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. 2. SHOULD THE FABRIC DECOMPOSE OR BECOME INEFFECTIVE PRIOR TO THE END OF THE EXPECTED USEABLE LIFE AND THE BARRIER STILL BE NECESSARY, THE FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY, 3, SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER EACH STORM EVENT. THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN DEPDStrS REACH APPROXIMATELY 11$ THE HEIGHT OF THE BARRIER, 4. ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING IN PLACE AFTER THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER BARRIER 15 NO LONGER REQUIRED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH THE EXISTING GRADE, PREPARED AND SEEDED. S. WETLANDS ARE TO BE PROTECTED BY TWO ROWS OF H.D. SST FENCE. DOUBLE H.O. SILT FENCE IS REQUIRED AROUND WATER BODIES, STEEP SLOPES. AND HICHLY ERODIBLE SOILS. HUGO PLACEMENT AND CONSTRUCTION OF A SILT FENCE -14 1.5" WEAR - 2360 WEAR COURSE MIXTURE B (LVWE45030B) ORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD TACK COAT, MNDOT 2357 2" BASE - 2360 NON -WEAR COURSE MIXTURE B (LVNW35030B) ORDINARY COMPACTION METHOD 6" AGG. BASE, CL 5 OR CL 6 MNDOT 3138 SPECIFIED DENSITY COMPACTION METHOD APPROVED GRANULAR SUBBASE AS DETERMINED BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PAVING SHALL CONFORM TO THE LATEST EDITION OF MNDOT'S STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND THE CITY'S STANDARDS FOR STREET AND UTILITY CONSTRUCTION. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER TO REVIEW ON -SITE SOILS AND PAVEMENT SECTION PRIOR TO ANY INSTALLATIONS. PROPOSED BITUMINOUS NOT TO SCALE PLATE NO. HU-EC-2 REVISION DATE : APRIL 2U15 B• Dlstence to �VadaNe 112" r 113 � VV 112' r SL0PE314•rFT.mr Mn/DOT B 618 B" 18" g• Distance to CE Variable 1 J2" r 3"r m !, 3 r112"r d r! �— SLOPErb 314'IFT. MnIDOT B 624 a M1 8 ! , J + 8' 2a- 2W r FACE OFCURB 1Yr� �a• f 112-� TOP OF BITUMiNUS MAT s n � - la. MODIFIED 'S' DESIGN 4" a BASE IS.Distance to C Vdable 112"f - �112' r 13'Lr, MnIDOT B 612 N DTES: 1. MINIMUM OF 7 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER ALL CURB AND GUTTER PLATE NO.HU-STR-21B CONCRETE DAT'E1°N APRIL2015 HUGO CURB & GUTTER 4.1 TERMINATION OF COVERAGE. [MINN. R. 70901 4.2 PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ALL TERMINATION CONDITIONS LISTED IN SECTION 13 ARE COMPLETE. [MINN. R. 7090] 4.3 PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER SELLING OR OTHERWISE LEGALLY TRANSFERRING THE ENTIRE SITE, INCLUDING PERMIT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ROADS (E.G., STREET SWEEPING) AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINAL CLEAN OUT, OR TRANSFERRING PORTIONS OF A SITE TO ANOTHER PARTY. THE PERMITTEES' COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT TERMINATES AT MIDNIGHT ON THE SUBMISSION DATE OF THE NOT. [MINN. R. 7090] 4.4 PERMITTEES MAY TERMINATE PERMIT COVERAGE PRIOR TO COMPLETION OF ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IF THEY MEET ALL OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: A. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED FOR AT LEAST 90 DAYS; AND B. AT LEAST 90 PERCENT (BY AREA) OF ALL ORIGINALLY PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND PERMANENT COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED ON THOSE AREAS; AND C. ON AREAS WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE, PERMANENT COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED; AND D. THE SITE COMPLIES WITH ITEM 13.3 THROUGH 13.7. AFTER PERMIT COVERAGE IS TERMINATED UNDER THIS ITEM, ANY SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT ON THE REMAINING PORTIONS OF THE SITE WILL REQUIRE PERMIT COVERAGE IF THE SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENT ITSELF OR AS PART OF THE REMAINING COMMON PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT OR SALE WILL RESULT IN LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES OF ONE (1) OR MORE ACRES IN SIZE. [MINN. R. 70901 4.5 PERMITTEES MAY TERMINATE COVERAGE UPON MPCA APPROVAL AFTER SUBMITTING INFORMATION DOCUMENTING THE OWNER CANCELED THE PROJECT. [MINN. R. 7090] 6.1 SWPPP AMENDMENTS. (MINN. R. 7090 6.2 ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.A OR ITEM 21.2.B OR ANOTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL MUST COMPLETE ALL SWPPP CHANGES. CHANGES INVOLVING THE USE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP MUST INCLUDE A JUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOW THE REPLACEMENT BMP IS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS. [MINN. R. 70901 6.3 PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVING A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER. [MINN. R. 7090] 6.4 PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BY THE SITE OWNER OR OPERATOR, USEPA OR MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE IN ELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER OR THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES (E.G., NUISANCE CONDITIONS AS DEFINED IN MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE OBJECTIVES OF A USEPA APPROVED TMDL. [MINN. R. 7050.0210] 7.1 BMP SELECTION AND INSTALLATION. [MINN. R. 7.2 PERMITTEES MUST SELECT, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN THE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP AND IN THIS PERMIT IN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTIONAL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES. [MINN. R. 7090] 8.1 EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES. [MINN. R. 7090 8.2 BEFORE WORK BEGINS, PERMITTEES MUST DELINEATE THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED. [MINN. R. 70901 8.3 PERMITTEES MUST MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR DISTURBANCE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT WITH STEEP SLOPES. WHEN STEEP SLOPES MUST BE DISTURBED, PERMITTEES MUST USE TECHNIQUES SUCH AS PHASING AND STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNED FOR STEEP SLOPES (E.G., SLOPE DRAINING AND TERRACING). [MINN. R. 7090] 8.4 PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, INCLUDING STOCKPILES. STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 7 CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) BUT PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE. [MINN. R. 7090] 8.5 FOR PUBLIC WATERS THAT THE MINNESOTA DNR HAS PROMULGATED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURING SPECIFIED FISH SPAWNING TIME FRAMES, PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE WATER'S EDGE, AND THAT DRAIN TO THESE WATERS, WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING THE RESTRICTION PERIOD. [MINN. R. 7090] 8.6 PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF THE LAST 200 LINEAR FEET OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES OR SWALES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF REMAINING PORTIONS OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 7 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. [MINN. R. 7090] 8.7 TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DURING CONSTRUCTION (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK -DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES, ETC.) DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THESE AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THEIR USE AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM CEASES. [MINN. R. 7090] 8.8 PERMITTEES MUST NOT USE MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES WITHIN ANY PORTION OF THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE SECTION WITH A CONTINUOUS SLOPE OF GREATER THAN 2 PERCENT. [MINN. R. 70901 8.9 PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT ALL PIPE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER OR PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. [MINN. R. 7090] 8.10 PERMITTEES MUST NOT DISTURB MORE LAND (I.E., PHASING) THAN CAN BE EFFECTIVELY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 11. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.1 SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES. [MINN. R. 70901 9.2 PERMITTEES MUST ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERS OF THE SITE AND DOWNGRADIENT AREAS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO ANY SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN AND MUST KEEP THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES IN PLACE UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER. [MINN. R. 70901 9.3 IF DOWNGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED, BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OR EXCESSIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND AMEND THE SWPPP TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN ITEM 6.3. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.4 TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK -CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.5 A FLOATING SILT CURTAIN PLACED IN THE WATER IS NOT A SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP TO SATISFY ITEM 9.2 EXCEPT WHEN WORKING ON A SHORELINE OR BELOW THE WATERLINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT TERM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G., INSTALLATION OF RIP RAP ALONG THE SHORELINE) IN THAT AREA IS COMPLETE, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL AN UPLAND PERIMETER CONTROL PRACTICE IF EXPOSED SOILS STILL DRAIN TO A SURFACE WATER. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.6 PERMITTEES MUST RE -INSTALL ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES, IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. PERMITTEES MUST RE -INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.7 PERMITTEES MUST PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS USING APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER ON ALL AREAS WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.8 PERMITTEES MAY REMOVE INLET PROTECTION FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (E.G. STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) IS IDENTIFIED BY THE PERMITTEES OR THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G., CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER). PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE NEED FOR REMOVAL IN THE SWPPP. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.9 PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF STOCKPILES ON THE DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER. [MINN. R. 70901 9.10 PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE STOCKPILES OUTSIDE OF NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.11 PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING BMP TO MINIMIZE THE TRACK OUT OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR ONTO PAVED ROADS WITHIN THE SITE. [MINN. R. 70901 9.12 PERMITTEES MUST USE STREET SWEEPING IF VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO THE STREET. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.13 PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.14 IN ANY AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE FINAL VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION WILL OCCUR, PERMITTEES MUST RESTRICT VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT USE TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.15 PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE. [MINN. R. 70901 9.16 PERMITTEES MUST DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.17 PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR, IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE ON THE SITE, PROVIDE REDUNDANT (DOUBLE) PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTH DISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT LEAST 5 FEET APART UNLESS LIMITED BY LACK OF AVAILABLE SPACE. NATURAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED ADJACENT TO ROAD DITCHES, JUDICIAL DITCHES, COUNTY DITCHES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, AND SEDIMENT BASINS. IF PRESERVING THE BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE REASONS IN THE SWPPP. SHEET PILING IS A REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROL IF INSTALLED IN A MANNER THAT RETAINS ALL STORMWATER. [MINN. R. 7090] 9.18 PERMITTEES MUST USE POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER. THE PERMITTEES MUST USE CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO CHEMICAL ADDITION AND MUST DIRECT TREATED STORMWATER TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR FILTRATION OR SETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. [MINN. R. 7090] 10.1 DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING. [MINN. R. 70901 10.2 PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT -LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MAY DEWATER TO SURFACE WATERS IF THEY VISUALLY CHECK TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND NUISANCE CONDITIONS (SEE MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) WILL NOT RESULT FROM THE DISCHARGE. IF PERMITTEES CANNOT DISCHARGE THE WATER TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING A SURFACE WATER, PERMITTEES MUST TREAT IT WITH APPROPRIATE BMPS SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE SURFACE WATER OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES. [MINN. R. 7050.0210] 10.3 IF PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE WATER CONTAINING OIL OR GREASE, THEY MUST USE AN OIL -WATER SEPARATOR OR SUITABLE FILTRATION DEVICE (E.G., CARTRIDGE FILTERS, ABSORBENTS PADS) PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. [MINN. R. 70901 10.4 PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN -DRAINING ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION OR SCOUR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS OR INUNDATION OF WETLANDS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS THAT CAUSES SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND. [MINN R. 70901 10.5 IF PERMITTEES USE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THEY MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURN THE BACKWASH WATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. [MINN. R. 7090] 11.1 INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE. [MINN. R. 70901 11.2 PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE A TRAINED PERSON, AS IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 21.2.B, WILL INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH IN 24 HOURS. [MINN. R. 7090] 11.3 PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT BMPS. [MINN. R. 70901 11.4 PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS. PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY UNLESS ANOTHER TIME FRAME IS SPECIFIED IN ITEM 11.5 OR 11.6. PERMITTEES MAY TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME IF FIELD CONDITIONS PREVENT ACCESS TO THE AREA. [MINN. R. 7090] 11.5 DURING EACH INSPECTION, PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS BUT NOT CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITION. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. PERMITTEES MUST USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ACCESS. IF PRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF OBTAINING ACCESS. PERMITTEES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLE PERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK IN SURFACE WATERS. [MINN. R. 7090] 11.6 PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FOR SEDIMENTATION FROM EROSION OR TRACKED SEDIMENT FROM VEHICLES. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM ALL PAVED SURFACES WITHIN ONE (1) CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY OR, IF APPLICABLE, WITHIN A SHORTER TIME TO AVOID A SAFETY HAZARD TO USERS OF PUBLIC STREETS. [MINN. R. 7090] 11.7 PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. [MINN. R. 7090] 11.8 PERMITTEES MUST DRAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND REMOVE THE SEDIMENT WHEN THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME. [MINN. R. 7090] 11.9 PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THAT AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT ON THE SITE (OR AVAILABLE TO THE PROJECT SITE IN THREE (3) CALENDAR DAYS) IS TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.B. [MINN. R. 7090] 11.10 PERMITTEES MAY ADJUST THE INSPECTION SCHEDULE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 11.2 AS FOLLOWS: A. INSPECTIONS OF AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH, EVEN IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUES ON OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE; OR B. WHERE SITES HAVE PERMANENT COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING ANYWHERE ON THE SITE, INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH AND, AFTER 12 MONTHS, MAY BE SUSPENDED COMPLETELY UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY RESUMES. THE MPCA MAY REQUIRE INSPECTIONS TO RESUME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT; OR C. WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, INSPECTIONS MAY BE SUSPENDED. INSPECTIONS MUST RESUME WITHIN 24 HOURS OF RUNOFF OCCURRING, OR UPON RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. [MINN. R. 7090] 11.11 PERMITTEES MUST RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEING CONDUCTED AND THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. THESE RECORDS MUST INCLUDE: A. DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; AND B. NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; AND C. ACCURATE FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE NEEDED; AND D. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES); AND E. DATE OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALL FOR EACH EVENT. PERMITTEES MUST OBTAIN RAINFALL AMOUNTS BY EITHER A PROPERLY MAINTAINED RAIN GAUGE INSTALLED ONSITE, A WEATHER STATION THAT IS WITHIN ONE (1) MILE OF YOUR LOCATION, OR A WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES SITE SPECIFIC RAINFALL DATA FROM RADAR SUMMARIES; AND F. IF PERMITTEES OBSERVE A DISCHARGE DURING THE INSPECTION, THEY MUST RECORD AND SHOULD PHOTOGRAPH AND DESCRIBE THE LOCATION OF THE DISCHARGE (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, SETTLED OR SUSPENDED SOLIDS, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHER OBVIOUS INDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS); AND G. ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION MUST BE DOCUMENTED AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 6 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS. [MINN. R. 70901 12.1 POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES. [MINN. R. 70901 12.2 PERMITTEES MUST PLACE BUILDING PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. PERMITTEES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COVER OR PROTECT PRODUCTS WHICH ARE EITHER NOT A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TO STORMWATER OR ARE DESIGNED TO BE EXPOSED TO STORMWATER. [MINN. R. 7090] 12.3 PERMITTEES MUST PLACE PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. [MINN. R. 7090] 12.4 PERMITTEES MUST STORE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE, (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM -BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) IN SEALED CONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7045 INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AS APPLICABLE. [MINN. R. 70901 12.5 PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7035. [MINN. R. 7035] 12.6 PERMITTEES MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKED OVER. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7041. [MINN. R. 70411 12.7 PERMITTEES MUST TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED INCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. PERMITTEES MUST REPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. 115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UP MEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE. [MINN. STAT. 115.061] 12.8 PERMITTEES MUST LIMIT VEHICLE EXTERIOR WASHING AND EQUIPMENT TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. PERMITTEES MUST CONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND MUST DISPOSE WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY PROPERLY. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS, OR SOLVENTS. [MINN. R. 7090] 12.9 PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS (E.G., CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PERMITTEES MUST PREVENT LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES FROM CONTACTING THE GROUND AND MUST DESIGN THE CONTAINMENT SO IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA RULES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A SIGN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY. [MINN. R. 7035, MINN. R. 7090] 13.1 PERMIT TERMINATION CONDITIONS. [MINN. R. 70901 13.2 PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MUST INSTALL PERMANENT COVER OVER ALL AREAS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. VEGETATIVE COVER MUST CONSIST OF A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATION WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATES NO VEGETATION, SUCH AS IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR THE BASE OF A SAND FILTER. [MINN. R. 7090] 13.3 PERMITTEES MUST CLEAN THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND MUST ENSURE THE SYSTEM MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 15 THROUGH 19 AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED. [MINN. R. 70901 13.4 PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. [MINN. R. 7090] 13.5 PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. PERMITTEES MAY LEAVE BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON -SITE IN PLACE. [MINN. R. 7090] 13.6 FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ONLY, PERMIT COVERAGE TERMINATES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IF THE STRUCTURES ARE FINISHED AND TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL IS COMPLETE, THE RESIDENCE SELLS TO THE HOMEOWNER, AND THE PERMITTEE DISTRIBUTES THE MPCA'S "HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET" TO THE HOMEOWNER. [MINN. R. 7090] 13.7 FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (E.G., PIPELINES ACROSS CROPLAND), PERMITTEES MUST RETURN THE DISTURBED LAND TO ITS PRECONSTRUCTION AGRICULTURAL USE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. [MINN. R. 7090] 14.1 TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS. [MINN. R. 70901 14.2 WHERE TEN (10) OR MORE ACRES OF DISTURBED SOIL DRAIN TO A COMMON LOCATION, PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN TO PROVIDE TREATMENT OF THE RUNOFF BEFORE IT LEAVES THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR ENTERS SURFACE WATERS. PERMITTEES MAY CONVERT A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN TO A PERMANENT BASIN AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE. THE TEMPORARY BASIN IS NO LONGER REQUIRED WHEN PERMANENT COVER HAS REDUCED THE ACREAGE OF DISTURBED SOIL TO LESS THAN TEN (10) ACRES DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCATION. [MINN. R. 70901 14.3 THE TEMPORARY BASIN MUST PROVIDE LIVE STORAGE FOR A CALCULATED VOLUME OF RUNOFF FROM A TWO (2)-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM FROM EACH ACRE DRAINED TO THE BASIN OR 1,800 CUBIC FEET OF LIVE STORAGE PER ACRE DRAINED, WHICHEVER IS GREATER. [MINN. R. 70901 14.4 WHERE PERMITTEES HAVE NOT CALCULATED THE TWO (2)-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM RUNOFF AMOUNT, THE TEMPORARY BASIN MUST PROVIDE 3,600 CUBIC FEET OF LIVE STORAGE PER ACRE OF THE BASINS' DRAINAGE AREA. [MINN. R. 70901 14.5 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN BASIN OUTLETS TO PREVENT SHORT-CIRCUITING AND THE DISCHARGE OF FLOATING DEBRIS. [MINN. R. 7090] 14.6 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN THE OUTLET STRUCTURE TO WITHDRAW WATER FROM THE SURFACE TO MINIMIZE THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS. PERMITTEES MAY TEMPORARILY SUSPEND THE USE OF A SURFACE WITHDRAWAL MECHANISM DURING FROZEN CONDITIONS. THE BASIN MUST INCLUDE A STABILIZED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW TO PREVENT FAILURE OF POND INTEGRITY. [MINN. R. 70901 14.7 PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE ENERGY DISSIPATION FOR THE BASIN OUTLET WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. [MINN. R. 7090] 14.8 PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE TEMPORARY BASINS OUTSIDE OF SURFACE WATERS AND ANY BUFFER ZONE REQUIRED IN ITEM 23.11. [MINN. R. 70901 14.9 PERMITTEES MUST CONSTRUCT THE TEMPORARY BASINS PRIOR TO DISTURBING 10 OR MORE ACRES OF SOIL DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCATION. [MINN. R. 7090] 14.10 WHERE A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN MEETING THE REQUIREMENTS OF ITEM 14.3 THROUGH 14.9 IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS SUCH AS SMALLER SEDIMENT BASINS AND/OR SEDIMENT TRAPS, SILT FENCES, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS OR ANY APPROPRIATE COMBINATION OF MEASURES AS DICTATED BY INDIVIDUAL SITE CONDITIONS. IN DETERMINING WHETHER INSTALLING A SEDIMENT BASIN IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST CONSIDER PUBLIC SAFETY AND MAY CONSIDER FACTORS SUCH AS SITE SOILS, SLOPE, AND AVAILABLE AREA ON -SITE. PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THIS DETERMINATION OF INFEASIBILITY IN THE SWPPP. [MINN. R. 7090] 15.1 PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. [MINN. R. 70901 15.2 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN THE PROJECT SO ALL STORMWATER DISCHARGED FROM THE PROJECT DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES DOES NOT CAUSE A VIOLATION OF STATE WATER QUALITY STANDARDS, INCLUDING NUISANCE CONDITIONS, EROSION IN RECEIVING CHANNELS OR ON DOWNSLOPE PROPERTIES, OR A SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO WETLANDS CAUSED BY INUNDATION OR DECREASE OF FLOW. [MINN. R. 7090] 15.3 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN AND CONSTRUCT A PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM TO TREAT THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME IF THE PROJECT'S ULTIMATE DEVELOPMENT REPLACES VEGETATION AND/OR OTHER PERVIOUS SURFACES CREATING A NET INCREASE OF ONE (1) OR MORE ACRES OF CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE. [MINN. R. 7090] 15.4 PERMITTEES MUST CALCULATE THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME AS ONE (1) INCH TIMES THE NET INCREASE OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT. [MINN. R. 7090] 15.5 PERMITTEES MUST FIRST CONSIDER VOLUME REDUCTION PRACTICES ON -SITE (E.G., INFILTRATION OR OTHER) WHEN DESIGNING THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. IF THIS PERMIT PROHIBITS INFILTRATION AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 16.14 THROUGH ITEM 16.21, PERMITTEES MAY CONSIDER A WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN, FILTRATION BASIN OR REGIONAL POND. THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONSIDER WET SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND FILTRATION SYSTEMS TO BE VOLUME REDUCTION PRACTICES. [MINN. R. 7090] 15.6 FOR PROJECTS WHERE THE FULL VOLUME REDUCTION REQUIREMENT CANNOT BE MET ON -SITE, (E.G., THE SITE HAS INFILTRATION PROHIBITIONS), PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE REASONS IN THE SWPPP. [MINN. R. 7090] 15.7 PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME TO A PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO A SURFACE WATER. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS ITEM, SURFACE WATERS DO NOT INCLUDE MAN-MADE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS THAT CONVEY STORMWATER TO A PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. [MINN. R. 70901 15.8 WHERE THE PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK PRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANY OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT PRACTICES REQUIRED BY SECTIONS 15 THROUGH 19, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL OTHER TREATMENT SUCH AS GRASSED SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS, PRIOR TO THE DISCHARGE OF STORMWATER TO SURFACE WATERS. [MINN. R. 7090] 15.9 FOR LINEAR PROJECTS WHERE PERMITTEES CANNOT TREAT THE ENTIRE WATER QUALITY VOLUME WITHIN THE EXISTING RIGHTOF-WAY, PERMITTEES MUST MAKE A REASONABLE ATTEMPT TO OBTAIN ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY, EASEMENT OR OTHER PERMISSION FOR STORMWATER TREATMENT DURING THE PROJECT PLANNING PROCESS. DOCUMENTATION OF THESE ATTEMPTS MUST BE IN THE SWPPP. PERMITTEES MUST STILL CONSIDER VOLUME REDUCTION PRACTICES FIRST AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 15.5. IF PERMITTEES CANNOT OBTAIN ADDITIONAL RIGHT-OF-WAY, EASEMENT OR OTHER PERMISSION, THEY MUST MAXIMIZE THE TREATMENT OF THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. [MINN. R. 7090] 16.1 INFILTRATION SYSTEMS. [MINN. R. 70901 16.2 INFILTRATION OPTIONS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: INFILTRATION BASINS, INFILTRATION TRENCHES, RAINWATER GARDENS, BIORETENTION AREAS WITHOUT UNDERDRAINS, SWALES WITH IMPERMEABLE CHECK DAMS, AND NATURAL DEPRESSIONS. IF PERMITTEES UTILIZE AN INFILTRATION SYSTEM TO MEET THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PERMIT, THEY MUST INCORPORATE THE DESIGN PARAMETERS IN ITEM 16.3 THROUGH ITEM 16.21. PERMITTEES MUST FOLLOW THE INFILTRATION PROHIBITION IN ITEM 16.14 ANYTIME AN INFILTRATION SYSTEM IS DESIGNED, INCLUDING THOSE NOT REQUIRED BY THIS PERMIT. [MINN. R. 70901 16.3 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN INFILTRATION SYSTEMS SUCH THAT PRE-EXISTING HYDROLOGIC CONDITIONS OF WETLANDS IN THE VICINITY ARE NOT IMPACTED (E.G., INUNDATION OR BREACHING A PERCHED WATER TABLE SUPPORTING A WETLAND). [MINN. R. 70901 16.4 PERMITTEES MUST NOT EXCAVATE INFILTRATION SYSTEMS TO FINAL GRADE, OR WITHIN THREE (3) FEET OF FINAL GRADE, UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAS BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND FULLY STABILIZED UNLESS THEY PROVIDE RIGOROUS EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO KEEP SEDIMENT AND RUNOFF COMPLETELY AWAY FROM THE INFILTRATION AREA. [MINN. R. 7090] 16.5 WHEN EXCAVATING AN INFILTRATION SYSTEM TO WITHIN THREE (3) FEET OF FINAL GRADE, PERMITTEES MUST STAKE OFF AND MARK THE AREA SO HEAVY CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT DO NOT COMPACT THE SOIL IN THE INFILTRATION AREA. [MINN. R. 7090] 16.6 PERMITTEES MUST USE A PRETREATMENT DEVICE SUCH AS A VEGETATED FILTER STRIP, FOREBAY, OR WATER QUALITY INLET (E.G., GRIT CHAMBER) TO REMOVE SOLIDS, FLOATING MATERIALS, AND OIL AND GREASE FROM THE RUNOFF, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE, BEFORE THE SYSTEM ROUTES STORMWATER TO THE INFILTRATION SYSTEM. [MINN. R. 7090] 16.7 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN INFILTRATION SYSTEMS TO PROVIDE A WATER QUALITY VOLUME (CALCULATED AS AN INSTANTANEOUS VOLUME) OF ONE (1) INCH OF RUNOFF, OR ONE (1) INCH MINUS THE VOLUME OF STORMWATER TREATED BY ANOTHER SYSTEM ON THE SITE, FROM THE NET INCREASE OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT. [MINN. R. 7090] 16.8 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN THE INFILTRATION SYSTEM TO DISCHARGE ALL STORMWATER (INCLUDING STORMWATER IN EXCESS OF THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME) ROUTED TO THE SYSTEM THROUGH THE UPPERMOST SOIL SURFACE OR ENGINEERED MEDIA SURFACE WITHIN 48 HOURS. PERMITTEES MUST ROUTE ADDITIONAL FLOWS THAT CANNOT INFILTRATE WITHIN 48 HOURS TO BYPASS THE SYSTEM THROUGH A STABILIZED DISCHARGE POINT. [MINN. R. 7090] 16.9 PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE A MEANS TO VISUALLY VERIFY THE INFILTRATION SYSTEM IS DISCHARGING THROUGH THE SOIL SURFACE OR FILTER MEDIA SURFACE WITHIN 48 HOURS OR LESS. [MINN. R. 7090] 16.10 PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE SOIL BORING, TEST PIT OR INFILTROMETER TEST IN THE LOCATION OF THE INFILTRATION PRACTICE FOR DETERMINING INFILTRATION RATES. [MINN. R. 7090] 16.11 FOR DESIGN PURPOSES, PERMITTEES MUST DIVIDE FIELD MEASURED INFILTRATION RATES BY 2 AS A SAFETY FACTOR OR PERMITTEES CAN USE SOIL -BORING RESULTS WITH THE INFILTRATION RATE CHART IN THE MINNESOTA STORMWATER MANUAL TO DETERMINE DESIGN INFILTRATION RATES. WHEN SOIL BORINGS INDICATE TYPE A SOILS, PERMITTEES SHOULD PERFORM FIELD MEASUREMENTS TO VERIFY THE RATE IS NOT ABOVE 8.3 INCHES PER HOUR. THIS PERMIT PROHIBITS INFILTRATION IF THE FIELD MEASURED INFILTRATION RATE IS ABOVE 8.3 INCHES PER HOUR. [MINN. R. 70901 16.12 PERMITTEES MUST EMPLOY APPROPRIATE ON -SITE TESTING ENSURE A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) FEET OF SEPARATION FROM THE SEASONALLY SATURATED SOILS (OR FROM BEDROCK) AND THE BOTTOM OF THE PROPOSED INFILTRATION SYSTEM. [MINN. R. 7090] 16.13 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN A MAINTENANCE ACCESS, TYPICALLY EIGHT (8) FEET WIDE, FOR THE INFILTRATION SYSTEM. [MINN. R. 7090] 16.14 THIS PERMIT PROHIBITS PERMITTEES FROM CONSTRUCTING INFILTRATION SYSTEMS THAT RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM VEHICLE FUELING AND MAINTENANCE AREAS INCLUDING CONSTRUCTION OF INFILTRATION SYSTEMS NOT REQUIRED BY THIS PERMIT. [MINN. R. 70901 16.15 THIS PERMIT PROHIBITS PERMITTEES FROM CONSTRUCTING INFILTRATION SYSTEMS WHERE INFILTRATING STORMWATER MAY MOBILIZE HIGH LEVELS OF CONTAMINANTS IN SOIL OR GROUNDWATER. PERMITTEES MUST EITHER COMPLETE THE MPCA'S CONTAMINATION SCREENING CHECKLIST OR CONDUCT THEIR OWN ASSESSMENT TO DETERMINE THE SUITABILITY FOR INFILTRATION. PERMITTEES MUST RETAIN THE CHECKLIST OR ASSESSMENT WITH THE SWPPP. FOR MORE INFORMATION AND TO ACCESS THE MPCA'S "CONTAMINATION SCREENING CHECKLIST" SEE THE MINNESOTA STORMWATER MANUAL. [MINN. R. 7090] 16.16 THIS PERMIT PROHIBITS PERMITTEES FROM CONSTRUCTING INFILTRATION SYSTEMS IN AREAS WHERE SOIL INFILTRATION RATES ARE FIELD MEASURED AT MORE THAN 8.3 INCHES PER HOUR UNLESS THEY AMEND SOILS TO SLOW THE INFILTRATION RATE BELOW 8.3 INCHES PER HOUR. [MINN. R. 70901 16.17 THIS PERMIT PROHIBITS PERMITTEES FROM CONSTRUCTING INFILTRATION SYSTEMS IN AREAS WITH LESS THAN THREE (3) FEET OF SEPARATION DISTANCE FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE INFILTRATION SYSTEM TO THE ELEVATION OF THE SEASONALLY SATURATED SOILS OR THE TOP OF BEDROCK. [MINN. R. 70901 16.18 THIS PERMIT PROHIBITS PERMITTEES FROM CONSTRUCTING INFILTRATION SYSTEMS IN AREAS OF PREDOMINATELY HYDROLOGIC SOIL GROUP TYPE D SOILS (CLAY). [MINN. R. 7090] 16.19 THIS PERMIT PROHIBITS PERMITTEES FROM CONSTRUCTING INFILTRATION SYSTEMS WITHIN A DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA) AS DEFINED IN MINN. R. 4720.5100, SUBP. 13, IF THE SYSTEM WILL BE LOCATED: A. IN AN EMERGENCY RESPONSE AREA (ERA) WITHIN A DWSMA CLASSIFIED AS HAVING HIGH OR VERY HIGH VULNERABILITY AS DEFINED BY THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH; OR B. IN AN ERA WITHIN A DWSMA CLASSIFIED AS MODERATE VULNERABILITY UNLESS A REGULATED MS4 PERMITTEE PERFORMED OR APPROVED A HIGHER LEVEL OF ENGINEERING REVIEW SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE A FUNCTIONING TREATMENT SYSTEM AND TO PREVENT ADVERSE IMPACTS TO GROUNDWATER; OR C. OUTSIDE OF AN ERA WITHIN A DWSMA CLASSIFIED AS HAVING HIGH OR VERY HIGH VULNERABILITY, UNLESS A REGULATED MS4 PERMITTEE PERFORMED OR APPROVED A HIGHER LEVEL OF ENGINEERING REVIEW SUFFICIENT TO PROVIDE A FUNCTIONING TREATMENT SYSTEM AND TO PREVENT ADVERSE IMPACTS TO GROUNDWATER. SEE "HIGHER LEVEL OF ENGINEERING REVIEW" IN THE MINNESOTA STORMWATER MANUAL FOR MORE INFORMATION. [MINN. R. 7090] 16.20 THIS PERMIT PROHIBITS PERMITTEES FROM CONSTRUCTING INFILTRATION SYSTEMS IN AREAS WITHIN 1,000 FEET UPGRADIENT OR 100 FEET DOWNGRADIENT OF ACTIVE KARST FEATURES. [MINN. R. 7090] 16.21 THIS PERMIT PROHIBITS PERMITTEES FROM CONSTRUCTING INFILTRATION SYSTEMS IN AREAS THAT RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE FOLLOWING INDUSTRIAL FACILITIES NOT AUTHORIZED TO INFILTRATE STORMWATER UNDER THE NPDES STORMWATER PERMIT FOR INDUSTRIAL ACTIVITIES: AUTOMOBILE SALVAGE YARDS; SCRAP RECYCLING AND WASTE RECYCLING FACILITIES; HAZARDOUS WASTE TREATMENT, STORAGE, OR DISPOSAL FACILITIES; OR AIR TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES THAT CONDUCT DEICING ACTIVITIES. [MINN. R. 7090] 17.1 FILTRATION SYSTEMS. [MINN. R. 70901 17.2 FILTRATION OPTIONS INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: SAND FILTERS WITH UNDERDRAINS, BIOFILTRATION AREAS, SWALES USING UNDERDRAINS WITH IMPERMEABLE CHECK DAMS AND UNDERGROUND SAND FILTERS. IF PERMITTEES UTILIZE A FILTRATION SYSTEM TO MEET THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PERMIT, THEY MUST COMPLY WITH ITEMS 17.3 THROUGH 17.11. [MINN. R. 7090] 17.3 PERMITTEES MUST NOT INSTALL FILTER MEDIA UNTIL THEY CONSTRUCT AND FULLY STABILIZE THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA UNLESS THEY PROVIDE RIGOROUS EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO KEEP SEDIMENT AND RUNOFF COMPLETELY AWAY FROM THE FILTRATION AREA. [MINN. R. 7090] 17.4 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN FILTRATION SYSTEMS TO REMOVE AT LEAST 80 PERCENT OF TSS. [MINN. R. 70901 17.5 PERMITTEES MUST USE A PRETREATMENT DEVICE SUCH AS A VEGETATED FILTER STRIP, SMALL SEDIMENTATION BASIN, WATER QUALITY INLET, FOREBAY OR HYDRODYNAMIC SEPARATOR TO REMOVE SETTLEABLE SOLIDS, FLOATING MATERIALS, AND OILS AND GREASE FROM THE RUNOFF, TO THE MAXIMUM EXTENT PRACTICABLE, BEFORE RUNOFF ENTERS THE FILTRATION SYSTEM. [MINN. R. 7090] 17.6 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN FILTRATION SYSTEMS TO TREAT A WATER QUALITY VOLUME (CALCULATED AS AN INSTANTANEOUS VOLUME) OF ONE (1) INCH OF RUNOFF, OR ONE (1) INCH MINUS THE VOLUME OF STORMWATER TREATED BY ANOTHER SYSTEM ON THE SITE, FROM THE NET INCREASE OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT. [MINN. R. 7090] 17.7 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN THE FILTRATION SYSTEM TO DISCHARGE ALL STORMWATER (INCLUDING STORMWATER IN EXCESS OF THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME) ROUTED TO THE SYSTEM THROUGH THE UPPERMOST SOIL SURFACE OR ENGINEERED MEDIA SURFACE WITHIN 48 HOURS. ADDITIONAL FLOWS THAT THE SYSTEM CANNOT FILTER WITHIN 48 HOURS MUST BYPASS THE SYSTEM OR DISCHARGE THROUGH AN EMERGENCY OVERFLOW. [MINN. R. 70901 17.8 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN THE FILTRATION SYSTEM TO PROVIDE A MEANS TO VISUALLY VERIFY THE SYSTEM IS DISCHARGING THROUGH THE SOIL SURFACE OR FILTER MEDIA WITHIN 48 HOURS. [MINN. R. 7090] 17.9 PERMITTEES MUST EMPLOY APPROPRIATE ON -SITE TESTING TO ENSURE A MINIMUM OF THREE (3) FEET OF SEPARATION BETWEEN THE SEASONALLY SATURATED SOILS (OR FROM BEDROCK) AND THE BOTTOM OF THE PROPOSED FILTRATION SYSTEM. [MINN. R. 70901 17.10 PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THAT FILTRATION SYSTEMS WITH LESS THAN THREE (3) FEET OF SEPARATION BETWEEN SEASONALLY SATURATED SOILS OR FROM BEDROCK ARE CONSTRUCTED WITH AN IMPERMEABLE LINER. [MINN. R. 70901 17.11 THE PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN A MAINTENANCE ACCESS, TYPICALLY EIGHT (8) FEET WIDE, FOR THE FILTRATION SYSTEM. [MINN. R. 70901 18.1 WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN. [MINN. R. 7090 18.2 PERMITTEES USING A WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN TO MEET THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PERMIT MUST INCORPORATE THE DESIGN PARAMETERS IN ITEM 18.3 THROUGH 18.10. [MINN. R. 70901 18.3 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN THE BASIN TO HAVE A PERMANENT VOLUME OF 1,800 CUBIC FEET OF STORAGE BELOW THE OUTLET PIPE FOR EACH ACRE THAT DRAINS TO THE BASIN. THE BASIN'S PERMANENT VOLUME MUST REACH A MINIMUM DEPTH OF AT LEAST THREE (3) FEET AND MUST HAVE NO DEPTH GREATER THAN 10 FEET. PERMITTEES MUST CONFIGURE THE BASIN TO MINIMIZE SCOUR OR RESUSPENSION OF SOLIDS. [MINN. R. 70901 18.4 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN THE BASIN TO PROVIDE LIVE STORAGE FOR A WATER QUALITY VOLUME (CALCULATED AS AN INSTANTANEOUS VOLUME) OF ONE (1) INCH OF RUNOFF, OR ONE (1) INCH MINUS THE VOLUME OF STORMWATER TREATED BY ANOTHER SYSTEM ON THE SITE, FROM THE NET INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT. [MINN. R. 70901 18.5 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN BASIN OUTLETS SO THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME DISCHARGES AT NO MORE THAN 5.66 CUBIC FEET PER SECOND (CFS) PER ACRE OF SURFACE AREA OF THE BASIN. [MINN. R. 7090] 18.6 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN BASIN OUTLETS TO PREVENT SHORT-CIRCUITING AND THE DISCHARGE OF FLOATING DEBRIS. BASIN OUTLETS MUST HAVE ENERGY DISSIPATION. [MINN. R. 7090] 18.7 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN THE BASIN TO INCLUDE A STABILIZED EMERGENCY OVERFLOW TO ACCOMMODATE STORM EVENTS IN EXCESS OF THE BASIN'S HYDRAULIC DESIGN. [MINN. R. 7090] 18.8 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN A MAINTENANCE ACCESS, TYPICALLY EIGHT (8) FEET WIDE, FOR THE BASIN. [MINN. R. 7090] 18.9 PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE BASINS OUTSIDE OF SURFACE WATERS AND ANY BUFFER ZONE REQUIRED IN ITEM 23.11. PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN BASINS TO AVOID DRAINING WATER FROM WETLANDS UNLESS THE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND COMPLIES WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 22. [MINN. R. 7090] 18.10 PERMITTEES MUST DESIGN BASINS USING AN IMPERMEABLE LINER IF LOCATED WITHIN ACTIVE KARST TERRAIN. [MINN. R. 70901 19.1 REGIONAL WET SEDIMENTATION BASINS. [MINN. R. 7090 19.2 WHEN THE ENTIRE WATER QUALITY VOLUME CANNOT BE RETAINED ONSITE, PERMITTEES CAN USE OR CREATE REGIONAL WET SEDIMENTATION BASINS PROVIDED THEY ARE CONSTRUCTED BASINS, NOT A NATURAL WETLAND OR WATER BODY, (WETLANDS USED AS REGIONAL BASINS MUST BE MITIGATED FOR, SEE SECTION 22). THE OWNER MUST ENSURE THE REGIONAL BASIN CONFORMS TO ALL REQUIREMENTS FOR A WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN AS DESCRIBED IN ITEMS 18.3 THROUGH 18.10 AND MUST BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCOUNT FOR THE ENTIRE AREA THAT DRAINS TO THE REGIONAL BASIN. PERMITTEES MUST VERIFY THAT THE REGIONAL BASIN WILL DISCHARGE AT NO MORE THAN 5.66 CFS PER ACRE OF SURFACE AREA OF THE BASIN AND MUST PROVIDE A LIVE STORAGE VOLUME OF ONE INCH TIMES ALL THE IMPERVIOUS AREA DRAINING TO THE BASIN. PERMITTEES CANNOT SIGNIFICANTLY DEGRADE WATERWAYS BETWEEN THE PROJECT AND THE REGIONAL BASIN. THE OWNER MUST OBTAIN WRITTEN AUTHORIZATION FROM THE APPLICABLE LGU OR PRIVATE ENTITY THAT OWNS AND MAINTAINS THE REGIONAL BASIN. [MINN. R. 70901 20.1 SWPPP AVAILABILITY. [MINN. R. 70901 20.2 PERMITTEES MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, INCLUDING ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS AT THE SITE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS BY PERMITTEES WHO HAVE OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. [MINN. R. 7090] 21.1 TRAINING REQUIREMENTS. [MINN. R. 70901 21.2 PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE ALL OF THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS RECEIVE TRAINING AND THE CONTENT AND EXTENT OF THE TRAINING IS COMMENSURATE WITH THE INDIVIDUAL'S JOB DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES WITH REGARD TO ACTIVITIES COVERED UNDER THIS PERMIT: A. INDIVIDUALS PREPARING THE SWPPP FOR THE PROJECT. B. INDIVIDUALS OVERSEEING IMPLEMENTATION OF, REVISING AND/OR AMENDING THE SWPPP AND INDIVIDUALS PERFORMING INSPECTIONS FOR THE PROJECT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUALS MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY THE MPCA. C. INDIVIDUALS PERFORMING OR SUPERVISING THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF BMPS. [MINN. R. 70901 21.3 PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE INDIVIDUALS IDENTIFIED IN SECTION 21 RECEIVE TRAINING FROM LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL AGENCIES, PROFESSIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, OR OTHER ENTITIES WITH EXPERTISE IN EROSION PREVENTION, SEDIMENT CONTROL, PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT AND THE MINNESOTA NPDES/SDS CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THESE INDIVIDUALS ATTEND A REFRESHER -TRAINING COURSE EVERY THREE (3) YEARS. [MINN. R. 7090] 24.1 GENERAL PROVISIONS. [MINN. R. 70901 24.2 IF THE MPCA DETERMINES THAT AN INDIVIDUAL PERMIT WOULD MORE APPROPRIATELY REGULATE THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY, THE MPCA MAY REQUIRE AN INDIVIDUAL PERMIT TO CONTINUE THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. COVERAGE UNDER THIS GENERAL PERMIT WILL REMAIN IN EFFECT UNTIL THE MPCA ISSUES AN INDIVIDUAL PERMIT. [MINN. R. 7001.0210, SUBP. 6] 24.3 IF THE PERMITTEE CANNOT MEET THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS GENERAL PERMIT, AN OWNER MAY REQUEST AN INDIVIDUAL PERMIT, IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. 7001.0210 SUBP. 6. [MINN. R. 7001.0210, SUBP. 6] 24.4 ANY INTERESTED PERSON MAY PETITION THE MPCA TO REQUIRE AN INDIVIDUAL NPDES/SDS PERMIT IN ACCORDANCE WITH 40 CFR 122.28(B)(3). [40 CFR 122.29(B)(3)] 24.5 PERMITTEES MUST MAKE THE SWPPP, INCLUDING ALL INSPECTION REPORTS, MAINTENANCE RECORDS, TRAINING RECORDS AND OTHER INFORMATION REQUIRED BY THIS PERMIT, AVAILABLE TO FEDERAL, STATE, AND LOCAL OFFICIALS WITHIN THREE (3) DAYS UPON REQUEST FOR THE DURATION OF THE PERMIT AND FOR THREE (3) YEARS FOLLOWING THE NOT. [MINN. R. 70901 24.6 PERMITTEES MAY NOT ASSIGN OR TRANSFER THIS PERMIT EXCEPT WHEN THE TRANSFER OCCURS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF ITEM 3.7 AND 3.8. [MINN. R. 7090] 24.7 NOTHING IN THIS PERMIT MUST BE CONSTRUED TO RELIEVE THE PERMITTEES FROM CIVIL OR CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR NONCOMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS PROVIDED HEREIN. NOTHING IN THIS PERMIT MUST BE CONSTRUED TO PRECLUDE THE INITIATION OF ANY LEGAL ACTION OR RELIEVE THE PERMITTEES FROM ANY RESPONSIBILITIES, LIABILITIES, OR PENALTIES TO WHICH THE PERMITTEES IS/ARE OR MAY BE SUBJECT TO UNDER SECTION 311 OF THE CLEAN WATER ACT AND MINN. STAT. SECT. 115 AND 116, AS AMENDED. PERMITTEES ARE NOT LIABLE FOR PERMIT REQUIREMENTS FOR ACTIVITIES OCCURRING ON THOSE PORTIONS OF A SITE WHERE THE PERMIT HAS BEEN TRANSFERRED TO ANOTHER PARTY AS REQUIRED IN ITEM 3.7 OR THE PERMITTEES HAVE SUBMITTED THE NOT AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 4. [MINN. R. 7090] 24.8 THE PROVISIONS OF THIS PERMIT ARE SEVERABLE. IF ANY PROVISION OF THIS PERMIT OR THE APPLICATION OF ANY PROVISION OF THIS PERMIT TO ANY CIRCUMSTANCES IS HELD INVALID, THE APPLICATION OF SUCH PROVISION TO OTHER CIRCUMSTANCES, AND THE REMAINDER OF THIS PERMIT MUST NOT BE AFFECTED THEREBY. [MINN. R. 7090] 24.9 THE PERMITTEES MUST COMPLY WITH THE PROVISIONS OF MINN. R. 7001.0150, SUBP. 3 AND MINN. R. 7001.1090, SUBP. 1(A), 1(B), 1(C), 1(H), 1(I), 1(J), 1(K), AND 1(L). [MINN. R. 7090] 24.10 THE PERMITTEES MUST ALLOW ACCESS AS PROVIDED IN 40 CFR 122.41(I) AND MINN. STAT. SECT. 115.04. THE PERMITTEES MUST ALLOW REPRESENTATIVES OF THE MPCA OR ANY MEMBER, EMPLOYEE OR AGENT THEREOF, WHEN AUTHORIZED BY IT, UPON PRESENTATION OF CREDENTIALS, TO ENTER UPON ANY PROPERTY, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, FOR THE PURPOSE OF OBTAINING INFORMATION OR EXAMINATION OF RECORDS OR CONDUCTING SURVEYS OR INVESTIGATIONS. [40 CFR 122.41(I)] 24.11 FOR THE PURPOSES OF MINN. R. 7090 AND OTHER DOCUMENTS THAT REFERENCE SPECIFIC SECTIONS OF THIS PERMIT, "STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS" CORRESPONDS TO SECTIONS 5, 6 AND 14 THROUGH 21; "CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS" CORRESPONDS TO SECTIONS 7 THROUGH 13; AND "APPENDIX A" CORRESPONDS TO SECTIONS 22 AND 23. [MINN. R. 7090] NPDES DEFINITIONS VICTOR PLACE PROJECT LOCATION XXXX VICTOR PATH HUGO, MN 55038 WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA LATITUDE: 45.1624 LONGITUDE:-93.0144 P.I.D. 1903121240077 1933121230154 DEVELOPER PRATT DEVELOPMENT/ POAC-CRAIN LLP 3500 WILLOW LAKE BLVD., STE. 100 VADNAIS HEIGHTS, MN 55110 651-429-8032 NARRATIVE - PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT INCLUDES PHYSICAL THERAPY CENTER WITH ADJACENT PARKING. THE EXISTING SITE IS UNDEVELOPED. STORM SEWER IS PROPOSED AND WILL CONNECT TO THE EXISTING SYSTEM WHICH IS ROUTED TO A REGIONAL POND FOR TREATMENT. SITE IMPERVIOUS AREAS BEFORE CONSTRUCTION AFTER CONSTRUCTION TOTAL SITE AREA 1.98 ACRES TOTAL ESTIMATED IMPERVIOUS 0.0 ACRES 1.19 ACRES TOTAL ESTIMATED PERVIOUS 1.98 ACRES 0.79 ACRES APPROX. 1.19 ACRE INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS TOTAL DISTURBED AREA 1.60 ACRES SITE MAP W/ EXISTING AND FINAL GRADES AND DESIGN CALCULATIONS SEE "STORMWATER DRAINAGE REPORT" FOR EXISTING AND PROPOSED AREA MAPS, DENOTING DRAINAGE AREA BOUNDARIES, DIRECTIONS OF FLOW, AND DISCHARGE POINTS WHERE STORMWATER LEAVES THE SITE. RECEIVING WATERS WITHIN ONE MILE NAME OF WATER BODY TYPE OF WATER BODY SPECIAL WATER IMPAIRED WATER UNNAMED POND POND NO NO CLEARWATER CREEK CREEK NO YES BUFFER TO SURFACE WATER IF THE SITE DRAINS TO A SURFACE WATER, IS A 50-FT NATURAL BUFFER ADJACENTTO THE SURFACE WATER PRESERVED? YES NO N/A NOTE: NATURAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED ADJACENT TO ROAD DITCHES, JUDICIAL DITCHES, COUNTY DITCHES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, AND SEDIMENT BASINS. TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS IF TEN O A COMMON LOCATION) OORE ACRES OF DISTURBED IL DRAIN T IS A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN PROVIDEDOR TREATMENT YES NO N/A OF THE RUNOFF BEFORE IT LEAVES THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR ENTERS SURFACE WATERS? A. NO TEMPORARY BASINS THAT COLLECT TEN (10) OR MORE ACRES INFILTRATION FEASIBILITY ❑ ❑ FE ARE THERE ANY INFILTRATION RESTRICTIONS FOR THE SITE (SEE 16.14 YES NO N/A THROUGH 16.21? A. IF YES, DOCUMENT THE RESTRICTION(S) ADDITIONAL STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES ❑ �■ ARE THERE ANY STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES PER: YES NO . ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW DOCUMENT? • ENDANGERED SPECIES REVIEW? • ARCHAEOLOGICAL REVIEW? • OTHER LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL REVIEW? IF YES TO ANY OF THE ABOVE, DESCRIBE THE MITIGATION MEASURES. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS PERMIT, MITIGATION MEASURES MEANS ACTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID, MINIMIZE, OR MITIGATE FOR IMPACTS RELATED TO EROSION PREVENTION, SEDIMENT CONTROL, THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM, POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES AND DISCHARGES ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT'S CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. [MINN. R. 7090] DOCUMENTATION OF TRAINED INDIVIDUALS A. INDIVIDUAL WHO PREPARED THE SWPPP: ADAM GINKEL PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE LINO LAKES MN 55014 (651)361-8234 adam@plowe.com B. INDIVIDUAL(S) OVERSEEING IMPLEMENTATION OF, REVISING AND/OR AMENDING THE SWPPP AND INDIVIDUALS PERFORMING INSPECTIONS FOR THE PROJECT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUALS MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY THE MPCA. [MINN. R. 7090] NAME COMPANY ADDRESS 1 ADDRESS PHONE EMAIL C. INDIVIDUAL(S) PERFORMING OR SUPERVISING THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF BMPS. [MINN. R. 7090] NAME COMPANY ADDRESS 1 ADDRESS 2 PHONE EMAIL LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENT STORMWATER FACILITIES AT THIS TIME, THERE ARE NO STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES PROPOSED. REVEGETATION SPECIFICATIONS ITEM MNDOT SPECIFICATION/NOTES SOD 3878 SEED "" 3876 * FOR TURF ESTABLISHMENT COMMERCIAL TURF MNDOT MIX 25-131 (220 LBS/ACRE) RESIDENTIAL TURF MNDOT MIX 25-131 (120 LBS/ACRE) TEMPORARY FALL COVER MNDOT MIX 21-112 (100 LBS/ACRE) SPRING/SUMMER MNDOT MIX 21-111 (100 LBS/ACRE) SOIL -BUILDING COVER MNDOT MIX 21-113 (110 LBS/ACRE) 1-2 YEARS COVER MNDOT MIX 22-111 (30.5 LBS/ACRE) 2-5 YEARS COVER MNDOT MIX 22-112 (40 LBS/ACRE) MULCH 3882 (TYPE 1 - DISC ANCHORED) FERTILIZER 3881 WOOD FIBER BLANKET 3885 (CATEGORY 2) " MOW A MINIMUM OF: RESIDENTIAL TURF - ONCE PER 2 WEEKS COMMERCIAL TURF - ONCE PER 4 WEEKS " SEEDED AREAS SHALL BE EITHER MULCHED OR COVERED BY FIBROUS BLANKETS TO PROTECT SEEDS AND LIMIT EROSION. QUANTITIES - ESTIMATED QUANTITIES FOR EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES TYPE QTY UNIT SILT FENCE 545 LINEAR FEET BIO-ROLLS XX EACH RIP -RAP W. GEO-FABRIC XX CUBIC YARDS CATCH BASIN INLET PROTECTION 9 EACH STABILIZED (SODDED) OVERFLOW XX EACH SEED & MULCH (GENERAL) XX ACRE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 EACH NARRATIVE - TIMING FOR INSTALLATION OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES 1. A COPY OF THE APPROVED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN AND SWPPP MUST BE AVAILABLE ON THE PROJECT SITE AT ALL TIMES. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL SILT FENCE AS SHOWN ON PLAN. 2.1. ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE MAY BE NECESSARY IF LOCAL CONDITIONS REQUIRE. 2.2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN SILT FENCE, INCLUDING THE REMOVAL OF ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT, THROUGH COMPLETION OF BUILDING CONSTRUCTION. 2.3. SILT FENCE SHALL REMAIN IN -PLACE UNTIL SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL THE ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 4. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL TREE PROTECTION FENCING AS APPLICABLE 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL PERFORM SITE GRADING ON AN AREA -BY -AREA BASIS TO MINIMIZE UNSTABILIZED AREAS. 5.1. CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY INITIATE STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 8.4 OF THE PERMIT, AND COMPLETE THE STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. 6. CONTRACTOR TO PROTECT PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT FACILITIES FROM CONSTRUCTION RUN-OFF. 6.1. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL AND CONSTRUCT SAID FACILITIES ONCE SITE HAS BEEN STABILIZED. 7. CONTRACTOR TO SHALL PAY SPECIAL ATTENTION TO ADJACENT PROPERTY LINES TO ENSURE THE EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INPLACE IN THOSE AREAS PREVENT MIGRATION OF SEDIMENT ONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES. 8. ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES SHOWN ON THE PLANS OR IMPLEMENTED IN THE FIELD SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY AND NPDES PHASE II PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. 9. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL SILT FENCE, BIOROLLS, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, OR OTHER APPROVED EQUAL FOR ANY SLOPES THAT APPEAR TO BE FAILING 10. CONTRACTOR TO STABILIZE SOIL STOCKPILES; STABILIZATION SHALL BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY 11. CONTRACTOR SHALL FINAL GRADE SWALE AREAS UPON STABILIZATION OF UPSTREAM AREAS. 12. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO SWEEP/SCRAPEADJACENT STREETS WHEN MATERIALS OR DEBRIS HAVE WASHED/FLOWED ONTO ADJACENT STREETS OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY 13. COORDINATE SMALL UTILITIES INSTALLATIONS (GAS, PHONE, ELECTRIC, CABLE, FIBEROPTIC, ETC.) AFTER CURB & GUTTER INSTALLATION. "BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS)" MEANS THE MOST EFFECTIVE AND PRACTICABLE MEANS OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL, AND WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PRACTICES THAT ARE THE MOST EFFECTIVE AND PRACTICABLE MEANS OF TO CONTROL, PREVENT, AND MINIMIZE DEGRADATION OF SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING AVOIDANCE OF IMPACTS, CONSTRUCTION -PHASING, MINIMIZING THE LENGTH OF TIME SOIL AREAS ARE EXPOSED, PROHIBITIONS, POLLUTION PREVENTION THROUGH GOOD HOUSEKEEPING, AND OTHER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES PUBLISHED BY STATE OR DESIGNATED AREA -WIDE PLANNING AGENCIES. [MINN. R. 70901 "CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY" MEANS ACTIVITIES INCLUDING CLEARING, GRADING, AND EXCAVATING, THAT RESULT IN LAND DISTURBANCE OF EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN ONE ACRE, INCLUDING THE DISTURBANCE OF LESS THAN ONE ACRE OF TOTAL LAND AREA THAT IS PART OF A LARGER COMMON PLAN OF DEVELOPMENT OR SALE IF THE LARGER COMMON PLAN WILL ULTIMATELY DISTURB EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN ONE ACRE. THIS INCLUDES A DISTURBANCE TO THE LAND THAT RESULTS IN A CHANGE IN THE TOPOGRAPHY, EXISTING SOIL COVER, BOTH VEGETATIVE AND NONVEGETATIVE, OR THE EXISTING SOIL TOPOGRAPHY THAT MAY RESULT IN ACCELERATED STORMWATER RUNOFF THAT MAY LEAD TO SOIL EROSION AND MOVEMENT OF SEDIMENT. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY DOES NOT INCLUDE A DISTURBANCE TO THE LAND OF LESS THAN FIVE ACRES FOR THE PURPOSE OF ROUTINE MAINTENANCE PERFORMED TO MAINTAIN THE ORIGINAL LINE AND GRADE, HYDRAULIC CAPACITY, AND ORIGINAL PURPOSE OF THE FACILITY. ROUTINE MAINTENANCE DOES NOT INCLUDE ACTIVITIES SUCH AS REPAIRS, REPLACEMENT AND OTHER TYPES OF NON -ROUTINE MAINTENANCE. PAVEMENT REHABILITATION THAT DOES NOT DISTURB THE UNDERLYING SOILS (E.G., MILL AND OVERLAY PROJECTS) IS NOT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. [MINN. R. 70901 "DEWATERING" MEANS THE REMOVAL OF SURFACE OR GROUND WATER TO DRY AND/OR SOLIDIFY A CONSTRUCTION SITE TO ENABLE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. DEWATERING MAY REQUIRE A MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES WATER APPROPRIATION PERMIT AND, IF DEWATERING WATER IS CONTAMINATED, DISCHARGE OF SUCH WATER MAY REQUIRE AN INDIVIDUAL MPCA NPDES/SDS PERMIT. [MINN. R. 7090] "EROSION PREVENTION" MEANS MEASURES EMPLOYED TO PREVENT EROSION SUCH AS SOIL STABILIZATION PRACTICES, PERMANENT COVER OR CONSTRUCTION PHASING. [MINN. R. 7090] "GENERAL CONTRACTOR" MEANS THE PARTY WHO SIGNS THE CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT WITH THE OWNER TO CONSTRUCT THE ENTIRE PROJECT DESCRIBED IN THE FINAL PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. WHERE THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT INVOLVES MORE THAN ONE CONTRACTOR, THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR IS THE PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR MANAGING THE ENTIRE PROJECT ON BEHALF OF THE OWNER. IN SOME CASES, THE OWNER IS THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR. IN THESE CASES, THE OWNER SIGNS THE PERMIT APPLICATION AS THE OPERATOR AND BECOMES THE SOLE PERMITTEE. [MINN. R. 7090] "GROUNDWATER" MEANS THE WATER CONTAINED BELOW THE SURFACE OF THE EARTH IN THE SATURATED ZONE INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ALL WATERS WHETHER UNDER CONFINED, UNCONFINED, OR PERCHED CONDITIONS, IN NEAR SURFACE UNCONSOLIDATED SEDIMENT OR REGOLITH, OR IN ROCK FORMATIONS DEEPER UNDERGROUND. [MINN. R. 7060] "HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET" MEANS AN MPCA FACT SHEET AVAILABLE ON THE MPCA CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER WEBSITE FOR PERMITTEES TO GIVE TO HOMEOWNERS AT THE TIME OF SALE. [MINN. R. 70901 "INFEASIBLE" MEANS NOT TECHNOLOGICALLY POSSIBLE OR NOT ECONOMICALLY PRACTICABLE AND ACHIEVABLE IN LIGHT OF THE BEST INDUSTRY PRACTICES. [MINN. R. 7090] "INITIATED IMMEDIATELY" MEANS TAKING AN ACTION TO COMMENCE SOIL STABILIZATION AS SOON AS PRACTICABLE, BUT NO LATER THAN THE END OF THE WORK DAY, FOLLOWING THE DAY WHEN THE LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASE, IF THE PERMITTEES KNOW THAT CONSTRUCTION WORK ON THAT PORTION OF THE SITE WILL BE TEMPORARILY CEASED FOR 14 OR MORE ADDITIONAL CALENDAR DAYS OR 7 CALENDAR DAYS WHERE ITEM 23.9 APPLIES. PERMITTEES CAN INITIATE STABILIZATION BY: A. PREPPING THE SOIL FOR VEGETATIVE OR NON -VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION; OR B. APPLYING MULCH OR OTHER NON -VEGETATIVE PRODUCT TO THE EXPOSED SOIL AREA; OR C. SEEDING OR PLANTING THE EXPOSED AREA; OR D. STARTING ANY OF THE ACTIVITIES IN A - C ON A PORTION OF THE AREA TO BE STABILIZED, BUT NOT ON THE ENTIRE AREA; OR E. FINALIZING ARRANGEMENTS TO HAVE STABILIZATION PRODUCT FULLY INSTALLED IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE APPLICABLE DEADLINE FOR COMPLETING STABILIZATION. [MINN. R. 7090] "IMPERVIOUS SURFACE" MEANS A CONSTRUCTED HARD SURFACE THAT EITHER PREVENTS OR RETARDS THE ENTRY OF WATER INTO THE SOIL AND CAUSES WATER TO RUN OFF THE SURFACE IN GREATER QUANTITIES AND AT AN INCREASED RATE OF FLOW THAN PRIOR TO DEVELOPMENT. EXAMPLES INCLUDE ROOFTOPS, SIDEWALKS, DRIVEWAYS, PARKING LOTS, AND CONCRETE, ASPHALT, OR GRAVEL ROADS. BRIDGES OVER SURFACE WATERS ARE CONSIDERED IMPERVIOUS SURFACES. [MINN. R. 7090] "NATIONAL POLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES)" MEANS THE PROGRAM FOR ISSUING, MODIFYING, REVOKING, REISSUING, TERMINATING, MONITORING, AND ENFORCING PERMITS UNDER THE CLEAN WATER ACT, AS AMENDED (33 U.S.C. 1251 ET SEQ. SECTION 1342 AND 40 CFR PARTS 122, 123, 124 AND 450). [MINN. R. 70901 "NATURAL BUFFER" MEANS AN AREA OF UNDISTURBED COVER SURROUNDING SURFACE WATERS WITHIN WHICH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE RESTRICTED. NATURAL BUFFER INCLUDES THE VEGETATION, EXPOSED ROCK, OR BARREN GROUND THAT EXISTS PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF EARTH -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. [MINN. R. 7090] "NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT)" MEANS THE FORM (ELECTRONIC OR PAPER) REQUIRED FOR TERMINATING COVERAGE UNDER THE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT. [MINN. R. 7090] MAP OF SURFACE WATERS 0 to 737crt c;t p - l�erir�rle Qk �� � x � z t } o ¢ z { u z � } -9 a L w 1 SITE I Hugo 0(9�ti f ¢r I I � r larbre k P3rk ea� I l4 ,..., I 61' y- I �4 C a a ke Rb c ""OPERATOR" MEANS THE PERSON (USUALLY THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR), FIRM, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, OR OTHER ENTITY DESIGNATED BY THE OWNER WHO HAS DAY TO DAY OPERATIONAL CONTROL AND/OR THE ABILITY TO MODIFY PROJECT PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS RELATED TO THE SWPPP. THE PERMIT APPLICATION MUST LIST THE OPERATOR AS A PERMITTEE. SUBCONTRACTORS HIRED BY AND UNDER SUPERVISION OF THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR ARE NOT OPERATORS. [MINN. R. 7090] "OWNER" MEANS THE PERSON, FIRM, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, OR OTHER ENTITY POSSESSING THE TITLE OF THE LAND ON WHICH THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES WILL OCCUR OR, IF THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS FOR A LEASE, EASEMENT, OR MINERAL RIGHTS LICENSE HOLDER, THE PARTY OR INDIVIDUAL IDENTIFIED AS THE LEASE, EASEMENT OR MINERAL RIGHTS LICENSE HOLDER; OR THE CONTRACTING GOVERNMENT AGENCY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. [MINN. R. 70901 "PERMANENT COVER" MEANS SURFACE TYPES THAT WILL PREVENT SOIL FAILURE UNDER EROSIVE CONDITIONS. EXAMPLES INCLUDE: GRAVEL, CONCRETE, PERENNIAL COVER, OR OTHER LANDSCAPED MATERIAL THAT WILL PERMANENTLY ARREST SOIL EROSION. PERMITTEES MUST ESTABLISH A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER (I.E., EVENLY DISTRIBUTED, WITHOUT LARGE BARE AREAS) WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OF THE NATIVE BACKGROUND VEGETATIVE COVER ON ALL AREAS NOT COVERED BY PERMANENT STRUCTURES, OR EQUIVALENT PERMANENT STABILIZATION MEASURES. PERMANENT COVER DOES NOT INCLUDE TEMPORARY BMPS SUCH AS WOOD FIBER BLANKET, MULCH, AND ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS. [MINN. R. 7090] "PERMITTEES" MEANS THE PERSONS, FIRM, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY, OR OTHER ENTITY IDENTIFIED AS THE OWNER AND OPERATOR ON THE APPLICATION SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA AND ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THIS PERMIT. [MINN. R. 70901 "PROJECT(S)" MEANS ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY PLANNED AND/OR CONDUCTED UNDER A PARTICULAR PERMIT. THE PROJECT OCCURS ON THE SITE OR SITES DESCRIBED IN THE PERMIT APPLICATION, THE SWPPP AND IN THE ASSOCIATED PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND CONTRACT DOCUMENTS. [MINN. R. 70901 "PUBLIC WATERS" MEANS ALL WATER BASINS AND WATERCOURSES DESCRIBED IN MINN. STAT. SECT. 103G.005 SUBP. 15. [MINN. R. 7090] "SEDIMENT CONTROL" MEANS METHODS EMPLOYED TO PREVENT SUSPENDED SEDIMENT IN STORMWATER FROM LEAVING THE SITE (E.G. SILT FENCES, COMPOST LOGS AND STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION). [MINN. R. 70901 "STABILIZE", "STABILIZED", "STABILIZATION" MEANS THE EXPOSED GROUND SURFACE HAS BEEN COVERED BY APPROPRIATE MATERIALS SUCH AS MULCH, STAKED SOD, RIPRAP, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, MATS OR OTHER MATERIAL THAT PREVENTS EROSION FROM OCCURRING. GRASS SEEDING, AGRICULTURAL CROP SEEDING OR OTHER SEEDING ALONE IS NOT STABILIZATION. MULCH MATERIALS MUST ACHIEVE APPROXIMATELY 90 PERCENT GROUND COVERAGE (TYPICALLY 2 TON/ACRE). [MINN. R. 7090] "STORMWATER" MEANS PRECIPITATION RUNOFF, STORMWATER RUNOFF, SNOWMELT RUNOFF, AND ANY OTHER SURFACE RUNOFF AND DRAINAGE. [MINN. R. 7090] "STEEP SLOPES" MEANS SLOPES THAT ARE 1:3 (V:H) (33.3 PERCENT) OR STEEPER IN GRADE. [MINN. R. 7090] "STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)" MEANS A PLAN FOR STORMWATER DISCHARGE THAT INCLUDES ALL REQUIRED CONTENT UNDER IN SECTION 5 THAT DESCRIBES THE EROSION PREVENTION, SEDIMENT CONTROL AND WASTE CONTROL BMPS AND PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS. [MINN. R. 7090] "SURFACE WATER OR WATERS" MEANS ALL STREAMS, LAKES, PONDS, MARSHES, WETLANDS, RESERVOIRS, SPRINGS, RIVERS, DRAINAGE SYSTEMS, WATERWAYS, WATERCOURSES, AND IRRIGATION SYSTEMS WHETHER NATURAL OR ARTIFICIAL, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, EXCEPT THAT SURFACE WATERS DO NOT INCLUDE STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTED FROM UPLAND. THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONSIDER STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS CONSTRUCTED IN WETLANDS AND MITIGATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 22 AS SURFACE WATERS. [MINN. R. 7090] "WATERS OF THE STATE" (AS DEFINED IN MINN. STAT. SECT. 115.01, SUBP. 22) MEANS ALL STREAMS, LAKES, PONDS, MARSHES, WATERCOURSES, WATERWAYS, WELLS, SPRINGS, RESERVOIRS, AQUIFERS, IRRIGATION SYSTEMS, DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND ALL OTHER BODIES OR ACCUMULATIONS OF WATER, SURFACE OR UNDERGROUND, NATURAL OR ARTIFICIAL, PUBLIC OR PRIVATE, WHICH ARE CONTAINED WITHIN, FLOW THROUGH, OR BORDER UPON THE STATE OR ANY PORTION THEREOF. [MINN. STAT. 115.01, SUBP. 22] "WATER QUALITY VOLUME" MEANS ONE (1) INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE NET INCREASE IN IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT (CALCULATED AS AN INSTANTANEOUS VOLUME). [MINN. R. 7090] "WETLANDS" (AS DEFINED IN MINN. R. 7050.0186, SUBP. 1A.B.) MEANS THOSE AREAS THAT ARE INUNDATED OR SATURATED BY SURFACE WATER OR GROUNDWATER AT A FREQUENCY AND DURATION SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT, AND UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES DO SUPPORT, A PREVALENCE OF VEGETATION TYPICALLY ADAPTED FOR LIFE IN SATURATED SOIL CONDITIONS. WETLANDS GENERALLY INCLUDE SWAMPS, MARSHES, BOGS, AND SIMILAR AREAS. CONSTRUCTED WETLANDS DESIGNED FOR WASTEWATER TREATMENT ARE NOT WATERS OF THE STATE. WETLANDS MUST HAVE THE FOLLOWING ATTRIBUTES: 1. A PREDOMINANCE OF HYDRIC SOILS; AND 2. INUNDATED OR SATURATED BY SURFACE WATER OR GROUNDWATER AT A FREQUENCY AND DURATION SUFFICIENT TO SUPPORT A PREVALENCE OF HYDROPHYTIC VEGETATION TYPICALLY ADAPTED FOR LIFE IN A SATURATED SOIL CONDITION; AND 3. UNDER NORMAL CIRCUMSTANCES SUPPORT A PREVALENCE OF SUCH VEGETATION. [MINN. R. 7050.0186, SUBP. 1A.B] THE FOLLOWING SPECIAL/IMPAIRED WATER BODIES ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT BOUNDARY: (1) CLEARWATER CREEK EPA -APPROVED IMPAIRMENT: BETHNIC MACROIVERTEBRATE BIOASSESSMENTS; FISHES BIOASSESSMENTS THESE IMPAIRMENT(S) ARE CONSIDERED TO BE CONSTRUCTION RELATED PARAMETERS AND REQUIRE THE ADDITIONAL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) FOUND IN ITEMS 23.9 AND 23.10 OF THE PERMIT IF THE PROJECT HAS A DISCHARGE POINT ON THE PROJECT WITHIN 1 MILE (AERIAL RADIUS MEASUREMENT) OF, AND FLOWS TO THE IMPAIRED STREAM. 23.9: PERMITTEES MUST IMMEDIATELY INITIATE STABILIZATION OF EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, AS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 8.4, AND COMPLETE THE STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. 23.10: PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN AS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 14 FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THAT SERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME. N/A SITE PLANNING & ENGINEERING PLOWE ENGINEERING, INC. 6776 LAKE DRIVE SUITE 110 LINO LAKES, MN 55014 PHONE: (651) 361-8210 FAX: (651) 361-8701 0 N 0 N CD 0 N 0 bi H Q 0 rn 00 rb 0 N O Z m O O Q } m z O Y U � � 2 � U � w w 00 1— Z Q O N M LO (O Z 0� w d M co 6' COU D ~ O Q F J w z j} o Z Z Z N a2QC7g S W Q W O U H 0 - J Q Q Z Q J = =OH F- O H U) U) LL 1=2QOH Y o o z w w co0 O a 0 Z_ , U C) - } w D 0 Q C9 N Of a- w Z WWaww Q N = 0- U) :i Q cl Z cl) O L) 2 ~z Lu ~ ~ aof 0 LLJ J c) -0,� U) z J O NO Z 2 w � Q LL Ovo Qw Z >XL) HOC LL Lu X O � Q a- �/� v J LU 0_' a_ SHEET C4.02 T.O ROOFT.O. ROOF T.O..0W EL.-14'4' II T.O. ELr20'_O"11 11 111111 HIT 11 MIT III III III 111 111111 AH I� ENANT 516 TENANTSIGN ENANT SIGN f TENANTSIGN I II T I1L TENANTSIGN T NAENiYT $IGLVIGN TENA�E►LtlT-5I5NGN TENANTSIG TENANTSIGN _ N� i i F.F.E. i EL. 0'-0" 1 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION A300 1/8"=1'-0" T.O. ROOF T.O. EL.-20'-0" - 1 TENANTSIGN-- 1 ENANT SIGN L L i i - J — r� a ri' � i r TENANT SIGN I \ it �ti]VA� — � ®a I SIG"I`� � SIGN TENANT SIfiN- L F.F.E. EL z NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION A 1/8"=1'-0" L A N D F O R M From Site to Finish Proposed Exterior Elevations VICTOR PLACE •Hugo, MN 05.18.2020 LenINomi®end Site to FinisM1®ere registeretl service marNs of LanINorm Professional Services, LLC. T.OY ROOF T.O. ROOF T.O. WALL EL -14'-8' III T.EL-20'-0" III if I F_ NT SIGN` 1 TENANTSIGN '.VI r ENANT SIGN TENANTSIGN II - -r. 1 TENANTSIGN TENANTSIGN -- TENANTSI \ TENANTSIGN - -i / SIGN— TENANTSIGN if I E. F.F. EL. 0'-0" SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION A300 1/8"=1'-0" '.I 7a IIITII Hill Will HIT IITII 111111 111111 IIITII IIITII IIIIII Will IIITII Hill 11111111 11111111 111 / T.O. WALL EL.Y 20'-0" II I I'L I9 II_ iI I � � LI flI I ENANT SIGN TENANTSIGN ENANT SIGN TENANTSIGN II II II II II I1 II II II 'I II II li �A,I II II III II II II II 1I II II 11 II II II II II II II II II 7 TENANTSIGN _ J L — / TENANT 5I43N N TENA TETa1ANTSIGN TENANTSIGN 2 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION L A N D From Site to Finish FiEffe-INKIMN Alternative Roofline - North Exterior Mirrors South Exterior VICTOR PLACE • Hugo, MN 05.18.2020 Lendfomi®end Sits to MIMI* are gi—d service made of Land Professional Services, LM T.O. ROOF T.O. ROOF T.O. WALL EL =14'-8' T.O._� a LI C --�- TENANT SIGN7 - - - ENANT SIGN 1 TENANT SIGN III TENANT SIGN` 1 II LI LIT 11 111111 11 11 11,111 II 11 Il TENANTSIGN i I TENffiMGGN - - TENANT SIGN - NANTSIGN _ TENANT SIGN / r r r SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION A300 1/8"=1'-0" I-rp■I■ir.■I-r..■1■rr.•■...■1■rr.•1.rr.■L.p■1■rr.■Lrr..l■r..■r■rr-I■r. �mmmmmmmmmmmmnm�nn mmminmm�mm r ..1.Irr■....1.1■rll...a...a....1-...1.Lr■1-...1...a....1...a...a.Irra■...1.Irr■LI-■1■Irra.-r.larra-Irr-.p �imm�rmrnmm�mnmmmm�tfmmmmmmmmm�nmmmmmmnrmmmrmmItmm�mnrmmmil. limingnullnminulfnnllWummllnnlnffmuiimngnll mllmllrmnlmlllmlllmnlllmnrmnlmlllmlll .IIImI11mI11mlllmlllmlllmlllmllrmlllm[QmI1Ill 11 nrmiiminminmin iumm�mn�nnmrn[m�mnummllmullmmm�lll minminurfnminu�[m , nminmlllminmimm�l► mnl�mn�mumm�mu�numnlimili AmlUmmmlUmrllm�pmnl .ummmm�nnnwlnmm�nrnnl itlmlllmlllmll Il1�I�IlrmlllmlllmlrrmnllmlUmlUmlUmrUmIUII�.. mnnnmmmnnl�mmmmmmm�munnnmm�m. ,rmrUmimm�lrmlllmlllmlllmnlmimm�lminmIlrminmrUminmIUmrllm�nmrUmlll mummmmmmmnnmm�nummllnmm�nlnnnnunnmm�mnnnnummmmmm Ill IIImslill �lrml r�l mmmnnnmmnnmm�m . nmm�nnmm�nlirnm�nlnnmmnmm�frtmnnmm�m�mmm�mnmmmnlnrmnnnnm.. • limnnnnrmn�mlirmnm�nmmlmnminrmnmrminmmlumnminlmnmlminnrtmumnl. rmmm�lmml rmmmnlmnmm�lmmm�n, .rlm�mmnni�mmm�i�nm�nn[�nnl�nmr,nni�nm�nni�mm�nnmm�nni�nm�nnir,mmn wnnnnnmmnnnnlmnmrnmmnnurmmmu�mnmmmmlmunnmmunnnlmnnnn nmmlmomnrlmumnrmnrnnnlmmm�lmmmmmnlmm nnmmf�rnnnmm�ni�nm� . nmmnnnlmmm�r n�mnrmunnq�mnmlmin rmnlmnlmm Immmmmnllmumnlmnnl Imnlmnlmlll Illmlllmlllmlllmlllmlllmlll n•nlll[I�Inmm IIMII•I�IOm1uN1.1 �immllmumnlmnlnnmm�lmmmmmmmmmmmmmnlmn linmmmmmmnlmmmmmnunn•I�1 fl Imnl loll _i`. �m1Omr•1•I�111•Illll•I�IRII�IIIm[O ILnm.�u®n0mmmmmNul�1®u•nlnTENANTSIGN -•-...................... _ Ill 1 lmmlmnr,...,_..... r._ mnmrmmmmmnlmmmm i�earai�auNr (�� -i �i�enna�e±ra.� �ME � wracre�crFnae� ra'r ' L — loss NINE I I JIMIN 11 1 ' 0 Alternative Roofline 2 -Low Roofline Varies, Pitched Roofline Mirrors South Exterior L A N D F O R M VICTOR PLACE -Hugo, MN From Site to Finish 05.18.2020 LenINomi®end Site to FinisM1®ere registeretl service marNs of LanINorm Professional Services, LLC. Agenda Number E.1 CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING STAFF REPORT TO: Hugo Planning Commission FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: 2020-2024 Capital Improvement Projects DATE: May 21, 2020, for the Planning Commission Meeting of May 28, 2020 1. BACKGROUND: The 5-year CIP is financial planning tool that is used by the City. Approval of the CIP is required by the City Council prior to the issuance of any bonds for financing of public improvements. According to Minnesota Statute 462.356, capital improvements shall be reviewed by the Planning Commission to determine whether or not they are consistent with the City of Hugo 2040 Comprehensive Plan. There are several capital improvement projects planned for the years 2020-2024 for the Planning Commission's review and approval. The projects that are proposed to be financed with bond are the Public Works Facility and Lions Park. Staff has outlined the project below and how they are consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 2. PROPOSED PROJECTS AND CONSISTENCY WITH THE COMP PLAN: Park Improvements Neighborhood Parks: Adelaide Landing Park and Goodview Trail Study The Adelaide Landing Park is located in the Adelaide Landing residential development and the land was dedicated by the developer for the park. The master plan includes a parking lot, soccer field, pickle ball court, sport court, shelter, and playground equipment. The parking lot was installed last year by the developer. As part of the master plan for the park, the pickle ball court, sport court, shelter, and playground equipment is proposed to be installed this year. The Goodview Avenue trail study will include a concept plan and provide recommendations on the feasibility of a trail along Goodview Avenue between Egg Lake Road and 1451h Street. If feasible this would close a gap between public trails, which is a goal of the Parks Commission. The City has awarded grant funding for a partnership project with Health Living Washington Page 2 County through the Statewide Health Improvement Program that covers most of the cost of the study. Both of these park improvements were listed in the 2020 Parks Commission goals and were in the 2020 Parks Commission budget. At its April 15, 2020, meeting the Parks Commission decided to move forward with the Goodview Avenue trail study. At its May 19, 2020, meeting the Parks Commission approved the Space X concept plan from Ultimate Recreation for the Adelaide Landing Park. The Parks Commission will work with the companies on the final plans for the playgrounds at the park. There are also a few miscellaneous park upgrades, playground replacements, and trail projects included in the CIP. Community Parks: Lions Park, Irish Avenue Park, and Clearwater Creek Preserve Park On May 13, 2019 the Hugo City Council and Parks Commission held a workshop to discuss funding of community parks. A background was given on City parks and the approved community park master plans. The City's financial consultant provided information on how cities can fund park improvements and survey opportunities. The City Council and Parks Commission discussed parks usage, phasing and prioritizing of park improvements, and funding options. This year the City Council approved an increase to the tax levy to fund community park improvement projects. At the meeting of June 19, 2019 the Parks Commission identified their priorities for community park development. This was later presented to the City Council at their budget workshop on September 5, 2019. The first priority was re -development of Lions Park. Lions Park is located west of City Hall. This is the community park where most large community events occur such as Good Neighbor Days. A few years ago the City approved Master Plan for Lions Park. The master plan includes a large picnic shelter, parking lot, roadway improvements, and stormwater improvements, memorial garden, playground, splash pad, sports courts, fire pit and amphitheater. At its April 20, 2020, meeting the City Council, per the recommendation from the Parks Commission, approved a feasibility study to be completed for Lions Park. The CIP identified the park improvements to start in 2021. Also in the CIP are smaller improvements to Irish Avenue Park and Clearwater Creek Preserve Park. Irish Avenue Park will have interim park improvements such as a parking lot and trails. The Parks Commission will also create a master plan for Irish Avenue Park and decide the uses for the park. Last year the Parks Commission created and approved a master plan for Clearwater Creek Preserve Park. The master plan includes additional trails, a northern park access with parking area, and boardwalks over the creek in the park. Phase 1 of the improvements will be started in 2022. The proposed improvements are consistent with the Parks, Trails and Open Spaces chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. The chapter discusses a need for a neighborhood park in the general area of the Adelaide Landing development. Neighborhood parks often provide neighborhoods easy access to a variety of recreation facilities that include playground equipment and picnic facilities. The plan also shows a planned trail along Goodview Avenue. The chapter includes the Master Plan for Lions Park and has discussions about planning and anticipated improvements to Irish 2 Page 3 Avenue Park and Clearwater Creek Preserve Park. The chapter also includes guiding principles that state the City should continue to upgrade and maintain the existing parks and trails we have to create a high quality user experiences so that people return to the parks and value the parks system. Public Works Building Over the last several months the City Council has been discussing and studied the possible expansion of the Public Works facility. The current facility is unable to accommodate long term needs beyond 15 years at its current location. A study was done that evaluated construction of a brand new facility which would utilize 10-15 acres of the 125 acre Irish Avenue Park. A neighborhood meeting was held on March 4, 2020, for discussions with the adjacent property owners. The City Council has authorized the completion of construction plans for the new facility. The planning review for this new facility be in the next month and construction could start as early as 2020. The new Public Works facility is consistent with the Public Facilities chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. The chapter discusses facility needs to serve an expanding population. Among other things, it states that with the growth of the City expansions to the Public Works facility may be required. Street Reconstruction Proiects Over the past several years the City has held neighborhood meetings in areas of the City that have the potential for street reconstruction projects. Each year there are projects selected by feasibility and neighborhood interest. The City has five proposed street construction projects. The benefited property owners will be assessed for the reconstruction project. The proposed street reconstruction projects are consistent with the Transportation chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. The plan outlines policies for roadway maintenance and operations that discuss upgrading existing roadways. The plan encourages maintenance of existing roadways by repairing weather -related and other road damage when warranted. Maintenance of existing infrastructure is also encouraged within the Transportation chapter. Water Tower #4 The project is located east of Highway 61, off of 1251h Street. This project includes the construction of a water tower. The well has already been drilled as part of a 2010 project. The construction of the water tower has started and we be completed this year. The construction Water Tower #4 is consistent with the Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. The plan outlines future water system improvements that include the construction of additional water tower. The chapter states that the construction of the Water Tower #4 will be needed in the years between 2018-2020. 3 Page 4 Stormwater Reuse Projects There are two new stormwater reuse project included in the CIP as well as maintenance projects for existing City owned stormwater reuse projects. The new projects include the Phase 2 of the Waters Edge stormwater reuse project and the County Road 8 stormwater reuse project. The County Road 8 project with likely be expanded with the Hugo Gardens Apartment development and the Lions Park project. The construction Water Tower #4 is consistent with the Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan. The plan outlines goals for the City to continue implementing stormwater reuse projects and the plan includes the Stormwater Reuse CIP. 3. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission review the proposed projects for consistency with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the capital improvement projects outlined in this staff report for 2020-2024 as being consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Attachments 1. DRAFT 2020-2024 CIP 2. Lions Park Master Plan 3. Clearwater Creek Master Plan 4. New Public Works Facility Location Map 5. Streets CIP Map 6. Water Tower #4 Location Map 2 City of Hugo 5-Year Capital Improvement Program 2020-2024 Page 2 Street Improvement Program Page 3 New Public Works Facility Page 4 Equipment Purchases Page 5 Parks Commission Projects Page 6 Lions Park Improvements Page 7 Water Construction Fund Page 8 Sewer Construction Fund Page 9 Stormwater Utility Fund City of Hugo 2020-2024 CIP Project: Street Improvement Fund Year: 2020-2024 Sources of Funds 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Beginning Fund Balance $ 5,266,196 $ 5,263,131 $ 4,215,133 $ 4,098,666 $ 2,284,000 Total Property Tax Levy $ 1,160,000 $ 1,160,000 $ 1,160,000 $ 1,160,000 $ 1,160,000 $ 5,800,000 Assessments - S. Egg Lake $ 13,160 $ 13,160 Assessments - Property Demo $ 2,377 $ 2,377 Assessments - 165th Street $ 4,806 $ 4,641 $ 4,476 $ 4,311 $ 4,145 $ 22,379 Assessments - Rice Lake Mea $ 39,003 $ 37,690 $ 36,377 $ 35,064 $ 33,751 $ 181,885 Assessments - 147/Oneka Lake Blvd $ 12,606 $ 12,199 $ 11,792 $ 11,385 $ 10,979 $ 58,961 Assessments - North Sunset Lake $ 13,844 $ 13,409 $ 12,973 $ 12,538 $ 12,102 $ 64,866 Assessments - Oneka Lk/Harrow $ 8,968 $ 8,694 $ 8,421 $ 8,147 $ 7,874 $ 42,104 Assessments - Goodview Ave (reclamation) $ - $ 19,650 $ 19,062 $ 18,474 $ 17,886 $ 75,072 State Aid* $ 653,456 $ 516,230 $ 516,230 $ 516,230 $ 516,230 $ 2,718,376 Total Sources of Funds *Estimated 21 % Reduction $ 1,908,220 $ 1,772,513 Uses of Funds $ 1,769,331 $ 1,766,149 $ 1,762,967 $ 8,979,180 MMM 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total 2020: Finish 130th Street (Adelaide Landino) $ 300.000 $ 300.000 Masonry Monument Sign - North End of Hwy 61 $ 75,000 $ 75,000 2021: Downtown Area (rural to urban recon) $ 2,820,511 $ 2,820,511 Excludes 145th Street & Finale Avenue Includes Extension of 147th to Oneka Pkwy 2022: Oneka Parkway (urban recon, mill & overlay) $ 1,860,798 $ 1,860,798 2023: 130th St & Farnham (urban recon) $ 849,540 $ 849,540 2023: Falcon Avenue (rural reclamation) $ 437,855 $ 437,855 2023: Flay Road (urban mill & overlay) $ 262,756 $ 262,756 2023: Beaver Ponds (urban mill & overlay) $ 451,371 $ 451,371 2023: Fenway Blvd, Europa, Fable Hill Way $ 1,293,751 $ 1,293,751 (urban mill & overlay) 2023: Goodview Avenue (urban mill & overlay) $ 260,542 $ 260,542 2024: Birch Tree Ponds (urban full bit removal) $ 1,517,381 $ 1,517,381 2024: Signal at Oneka Pkwy/CSAH 8 (county project) $ 25,000 $ 25,000 $ 200,000 $ 250,000 Total Uses of Funds Ending Fund Balance $ 1,911,285 $ 2,820,511 $ 1,885,798 $ 5,263,131 $ 4,215,133 $ 4,098,666 $ 3,580,815 $ 2,284,000 $ 1,717,381 $ $ 2,329,586 11,915,790 Page 2 Project: Public Works Facility at Irish Avenue Year: 2020-2024 2020 Beginning Cash Balance City of Hugo 2020-2024 CIP Sources of Funds 2021 2022 2023 2024 $ 557,581 $ 585,512 $ 612,063 Total Property Tax Levy $ 274,626 $ 557,581 $ 557,581 $ 557,581 $ 557,581 $ 2,504,950 Capital Improvement Bond Proceeds $ 7,200,000 $ 7,200,000 Underwriter's Discount (1.3%) $ (93,600) $ (93,600) Cost of Issuance $ (60,000) $ (60,000) Sale of Current Facility to ISD 624 $ 1,000,000 $ 1,000,000 Transfer from Water & Sewer (Fund 601) $ 3,000,000 $ 3,000,000 Transfer from Capital Facilities (Fund 406) $ 878,563 $ 878,563 Net Sources of Funds $ 12,199,589 $ 557,581 $ 557,581 $ 557,581 $ 557,581 $ 14,429,913 Uses of Funds 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total PW Space Needs Study (repay Fund 405) $ 19,289 $ 19,289 Pre -Construction Architect Fees $ 532,650 $ 532,650 Construction Related: Main Facility $ 8,995,000 $ 8,995,000 Site Related $ 905,000 $ 905,000 Salt Storage Building $ 150,000 $ 150,000 Post Bid Architect Fees and Permits $ 137,350 $ 137,350 - Less Bldg Permit Fee $ (60,000) $ (60,000) Furnishings $ 55,000 $ 55,000 Turn Lanes (Washington County) $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Other Costs (Telecom, Security, Surveys...) $ 158,000 $ 158,000 Contingencies (10%) $ 1,107,300 $ 1,107,300 Bond Principal & Interest $ - $ - $ 529,650 $ 531,030 $ 529,229 $ 1,589,909 Total Uses of Funds $ 12,199,589 $ - $ 529,650 $ 531,030 $ 529,229 $ 13,789,498 Ending Fund Balance $ - $ 557,581 $ 585,512 $ 612,063 $ 640,415 Page 3 Project: Equipment Purchases Year: 2020-2024 City of Hugo 2020-2024 CIP Sources of Funds 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Beginning Fund Balance $ 230,318 $ 81,318 $ 28,318 $ 92,318 $ 272,318 Property Tax Levy $ 221,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 1,181,000 Sale of Fixed Assets $ 40,000 $ 40,000 Total Sources of Funds $ 261,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 240,000 $ 1,221,000 Uses of Funds 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Fire Department Replace 10 Portable Radios (8 per year) $ 28,000 $ 28,000 $ 56,000 Aerial - Additional Equipment $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Replace Generator on 2003 Heavy Rescue Truck 1 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Replace Command Vehicle 01 $ 70,000 $ 70,000 Replace 6 Mobile Radios $ 26,000 $ 26,000 Public Works Department Replace Felling Trailer (Unit 312-06) $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Replace Ford F550 Bucket Truck (104-08) $ 95,000 $ 95,000 Replace Utility Crane Truck (Unit 107-02) - 1/3rd $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Replace Groundmaster 4100-D Large Area Mower $ 75,000 $ 75,000 Purchase Used Scissor Lift $ 12,000 $ 12,000 Replace JD 72" Mower with a ToolCat $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Replace Caterpillar 938H Wheel Loader $ 200,000 $ 200,000 Replace Asphalt Smooth Drum Roller (heavier weight) $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Replace Felling Trailer (Unit 310-05) $ 6,500 $ 6,500 Replace Carry -On Utility Trailer (Unit 311-05) $ 1,000 $ 1,000 Replace Felling Trailer (Unit 321-07) $ 6,500 $ 6,500 Replace Carry -On Utility Trailer (Unit 322-07) $ 1,000 $ 1,000 Replace Ford F550 4x4 Pickup (Unit 115-12) $ 80,000 $ 80,000 Replace Ford F550 Dump Truck (Unit 103-11) $ 60,000 $ 60,000 Total Equipment Purchases $ 410,000 $ 293,000 $ 176,000 $ 60,000 $ - $ 939,000 Ending Fund Balance $ 81,318 $ 28,318 $ 92,318 $ 272,318 $ 512,318 Page 4 Project: Parks Commission Projects Year: 2020-2024 City of Hugo 2020-2024 CIP Sources of Funds 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Beginning Fund Balance $ 1,446,749 $ 825,999 $ 777,999 $ 629,999 $ 581,999 Property Tax Levy $ 92,000 $ 92,000 $ 92,000 $ 92,000 $ 92,000 $ 460,000 County Grant Funds $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Total Sources of Funds $ 107,000 $ 92,000 $ 92,000 $ 92,000 $ 92,000 $ 475,000 Uses of Funds 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Adelaide Landing Park $ 650,000 $ 650,000 Goodview Ave Trail Feasibility $ 17,750 $ 17,750 Park Upgrades $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 140,000 $ 40,000 $ 140,000 $ 400,000 Misc. Trail Projects $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 400,000 Irish Avenue Park (Master Plan) $ 20,000 $ 20,000 Total Uses of Funds $ 727,750 $ 140,000 $ 240,000 $ Ending Fund Balance $ 825,999 $ 777,999 $ 629,999 $ Page 5 140,000 $ 240,000 581,999 $ 433,999 1,487,750 Project: Lions Park Improvements Year: 2020-2024 w City of Hugo 2020-2024 CIP Sources of Funds 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Beginning Fund Balance $ - $ 548,133 $ 3,002,114 $ 2,809,695 $ 2,837,626 Prooertv Tax Lew $ 556.133 $ 557.581 $ 557.581 $ 557.581 $ 557.581 $ 2.786.457 Cost of Issuance Total Sources of Funds LA 556,133 $ 7,603,981 $ 557,581 Uses of Funds 2020 2021 2022 557,581 $ 557,581 2023 2024 9,832,857 Total Park Planning - Feasibility Study $ 8,000 $ 8,000 Lions Park Improvements: - Park Pavilion/CommunityRoom/Restrooms $ 2,500,000 $ 2,500,000 - Roadwav Improvements - included in street CIP $ - $ - se - Parking Lot $ 500,000 $ 500,000 - Event Plaza/Water Feature $ 600,000 $ 600,000 - Ampitheater & Fire Pit $ 300,000 $ 300,000 - Sport Court & Ball Fields $ 200,000 $ 200,000 - Sidewalk/Trails $ 200,000 $ 200,000 - Relocate & Improve Skate Park & Playground $ 200,000 $ 200,000 - Memorial Garden $ 100,000 $ 100,000 - City Hall Plaza $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Irish Avanua Park Imnrnvamants- - Other Interim Use Improvements $ 50,000 $ 50,000 Clearwater Creek Preserve Improvements: - Phase I Upgrades $ 500,000 $ 500,000 Bond Principal & Interest $ 529,650 $ 531,030 $ 1,060,680 Total Uses of Funds $ 8,000 $ 5,150,000 $ 750,000 $ 529,650 $ 531,030 $ 6,968,680 Ending Fund Balance $ 548,133 $ 3,002,114 $ 2,809,695 $ 2,837,626 $ 2,864,177 Page 6 City of Hugo 2020-2024 CIP Project: Water Construction Year: 2020-2024 Sources of Funds 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Beginning Cash Balance $ 3,231,645 $ 1,340,732 $ 1,329,732 $ 1,243,732 $ 1,242,732 Future Infrastucture Charges: 50 Connections @ $680 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 170,000 Net Sources of Funds $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 34,000 $ 170,000 Uses of Funds 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Water Tower No. 4 (project balance) Total Construction Contract $ 1,790,447 $ 1,790,447 Engineering Fees $ 134,466 $ 134,466 Dismantle Tower No. 2 $ 30,000 $ 30,000 Watermain Connection at Tower No. 2 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Increase Well No. 2 Production $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Remove Pressure Reducing Valves: - Highway 61 $ 25,000 $ 25,000 - Goodview Avenue $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Control Panel Upgrades: $ - - Well No. 3 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 - Well No. 5 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 - Well No. 6 $ 10,000 $ 10,000 SCADA Upgrades $ 25,000 $ 25,000 Full Well Rehabs: $ - - Well No. 5 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 - Well No. 6 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 Total Uses of Funds $ 1,924,913 $ 45,000 $ 120,000 $ 35,000 $ 120,000 $ 2,244,913 Ending Fund Balance $ 1,340,732 $ 1,329,732 $ 1,243,732 $ 1,242,732 $ 1,156,732 Page 7 Project: Sewer Construction Year: 2020-2024 Beginning Fund Balance City of Hugo 2020-2024 CIP Sources of Funds 2020 2021 2022 $ 5,736,427 $ 5,765,827 $ 5,740,227 2023 2024 Total 5,729,627 $ 5,719,027 Future Infrastucture Charges: 50 Connections @ $588 $ 29,400 $ 29,400 $ 29,400 $ 29,400 $ 29,400 $ 147,000 Net Sources of Funds 29,400 $ 29,400 $ 29,400 $ 29,400 $ 29,400 $ 147,000 Uses of Funds Or 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Frenchman Road Sewer Lining Project $ 15,000 $ 15,000 Lift Station Panel Upgrades $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 160,000 Hwy 61 Sewer Lining Project (Egg Lake Area) $ 100,000 $ 100,000 Total Uses of Funds $ - $ 55,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 140,000 $ 275,000 Ending Fund Balance $ 5,765,827 $ 5,740,227 $ 5,729,627 $ 5,719,027 $ 5,608,427 Page 8 Project: Stormwater Utility Fund Year: 2020-2024 Beginning Cash Balance City of Hugo 2014-2018 CIP Sources of Funds 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total $ 1,081,617 $ 475,135 $ 395,923 $ 343,211 $ 290,499 Property Tax Levy $ 278,788 $ 278,788 $ 278,788 $ 278,788 $ 278,788 $ 1,393,940 JD2 Maint Reimbursement $ 151,714 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 311,714 From Waters Edge for Phase I & II Reuse $ 59,500 $ 59,500 $ 59,500 $ 59,500 $ 59,500 $ 297,500 From Apartment Developer for CSAH 8 Reuse $ - $ 50,000 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 7,500 $ 72,500 Grant Funds for Phase II Reuse Project $ 185,760 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 185,760 Grant Funds for CSAH 8 Reuse Project $ - $ 150,000 $ $ $ $ 150,000 From Lions Park Bond Issue $ - $ 500,000 $ $ $ $ 500,000 Total Sources of Funds $ 675,762 $ 1,078,288 $ 385,788 $ 385,788 $ 385,788 $ 2,911,414 Uses of Funds 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 Total Annual Bridge Inspections $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 7,000 $ 35,000 LGU Fees $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 45,000 $ 225,000 Planning... $ 23,000 $ 23,000 $ 23,000 $ 23,000 $ 23,000 $ 115,000 MS4 Expenses $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 4,500 $ 22,500 Stormwater Maintenance Costs: Culverts/Road Ditching $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 120,000 $ 600,000 Catch Basin Repairs (inhouse) $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000 $ 250,000 Catch Basin Repairs (outsourced) $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 500,000 JD2 Maintenance $ 151,714 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 40,000 $ 311,714 Dues, Flooding Issues, Backhoe Parts & Repairs... $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 35,000 $ 175,000 Water Reuse Project Costs: Waters Edge Phase II $ 732,030 $ 732,030 CSAH 8 $ 719,000 $ 719,000 Beaver Ponds (seasonal startup/winterization/electricity $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 2,000 $ 10,000 Waters Edge Reuse (seasonal startup/winterization/electricity) $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 12,000 $ 60,000 Total Uses of Funds $ 1,282,244 $ 1,157,500 $ 438,500 $ 438,500 $ 438,500 $ 3,755,244 Ending Fund Balance $ 475,135 $ 395,923 $ 343,211 $ 290,499 $ 237,787 Page 9 Vehicular Circulation & Parking Main park access off of Fitzgerald, 147th & Finale Ave. N. Fitzgerald connects all the way through with the parking lot designed to cut the flow / slow traffic. 90 Degree Parking along Upper 146th ST. N. Approximate total of 1 60-1 70 parking stalls. { ENTRY Pedestrian Circulation Entry plaza spaces along corners to emphasize entering the park Internal and external pedestrian loops. Park Amenities Main Park Pavilion: Picnic Space Warming House / Community Room Restrooms Community Sports Pad: Tennis Basketball Pickleball Various Open Lawn Spaces (size and location) Active recreational amenities placed along perimeter of park. lip ,.n PLAYGROUND EXAMPLES PAVILION EXAMPLES { SPLASH PAD EXAMPLES T1 Z D r m m Q PLAYGROUND (APPROP IATE FOR WIDE RANGE OF AGE GROUPS AND ABILITIES) 11 a... ENTRY PLAZA 1 r i r TI z D D { m Z SPLASH PAD / COMMUNITY PLAZA 147TH ST N COMMUNITY SPORTS PAD ;KING (23) AMPHITHEATER / STAGE OPEN SKATING FIRE PIT MEMORIAL UPPER 146TH ST. N. ENTRY PLAZA: • TRUCK ACCESS FOR GOOD i NEIGHBOR DAYS MAIN ENTRANCE TO OPEN FIELDS OPEN FIELD i OPEN LAWNd`$�l'�I SKATE PARK PARKING (28) PARKING (28) Woo I L6111111111110 t � j ;ONS PAR —CONNECTION TO REGIONAL TRAIL o so' ioo Scale: I" = 50' r it CITY C)F EST. 1906 31It -- a- FUTURE ROAD & TRAIL CONNECTION (140TH ST.) dhME EXISTING TRAIL ACCESS EXISTING / '• PARKING r74 1 ACCESS 1 i T i1 l4 PLAN 0' 100' 200' 400' Scale in Feet c1earwater eel? Preferred Concept P rin LEGEND Pedestrian Trail (aggregate or paved) Boardwalk Overlook Winter Trail • • • • • •� Waterway Bridge Existing City Trail Proposed Trail Access Point X -, wAmj�r. PARKING LOT/ TRAILHEAD FUTURE STORMWATER POND + 16 4 POTENTIAL FUTURE EXPANSION AREA ` SUMMARY NOTES: a = _!' • Park entrance off of future 140th Street Extension -Parking lot -Park & trail map (trailhead) -Open space -Small picnic shelter •Main park entrance off Fable Hill Circle North • remains YN - ' - -Parking (existing) -Park and trail map (trailhead) �; • Trail connection to Fenwav Blvd trail •'i. =F ill • wel Several loop trails /boardwalk system east and west sides of creek with trail maps • Several seating / overlooks along trails • Pedestrian bridge on north and south end of the park to cross the creek • West trail to connect to future residential development and trail north of 140th Street • Park trails connect to future trail along 140th Street • Existing policies regarding dogs, horses, & hunting remain unless conflicts arise x-� err{ BRIDGE WINTER TRAIL SIMPLE BOARDWALK r . .k 1L OVERLOOK k; ra WSB PV 011947-000 1 September 13, 2018 �° . LINE," Horseshoe Lake O 170T 3 170TH STN Project Year and Project Type I a oo 00 2020, Gravel to Asphalt , a Z w LL 2020, Reclaim and Pave 165TH ST N 2021, Full Reconstruction 3 w 2022, Full Reconstruction = 'Q N � I - - - - N 2022, Mill &Overlay g 3 w ,`��.� n 15gjh, 2023, Full Reconstruction o s m = 158THST c v '`z z 2 3 y O Oneka Lake - - - - 2023, Mill & Overlay i � � fyA z y 2 157TNSTN •� •� 2023, Reclaim and Pave N u� v HWA 2024, Full Bit Removal N HERffADEPKNN �Q � Q o EMPRESSWAVN � 0 `� •� •� 3 2025, Reclaim and Pave 152ND STN Co152ND S t N ,o? ,az, �� a i Y �d6 151ST ST N1 w e� W z Q 150TH STN K W z w , 0 w 48TH ST N w 1 150TH ST N. � Ns" � l 149TH ST N 147TysTN 147TH STN = ROSFMARy ` 147TH ST N . K'qY l Q0 z ox 4k 1 a " ZFc 147TH ST N w 0v li FNE MAN D Z m 146TH STN 145TH ST N NCH F,pFN 146TH STN Rice Lake{ Q c � VICTOP0, z BLVD N �i� Chq� 145TH ST N 7 qyp 'a z Egg Lake ^b a a r r" 141STSTN z z i x 140TH ST N LLr." ST N �9G = ,140TH FC kFR y T'4 o y 137TH ST N m w a • a FL qq� ii z z 0 135TH ST N 4, w A G Q 0 4, =0 13 132ND ST N z 1� In I-F/ 130TH ST N 130TH ST N a - 2 J : 1129'iH DRN z SSN `*�� - ` u ST N z • a w �w 128TH ST N z w z s16'(H c�i `> z 718T ,y Sunset Lake w a a = chi •a o� F = HSTN ! of z o ,= 125TH STN FOXHILL �•�����•�•�•�•�•�tim•�•�•�•�• 125TH ST N = w z ! Bald Eagle STN oz 0y qPo ' �� m 1$ �• NDStN Lake c2 ; m m A 122 O 4 v 121 ST STN 1 ; y• ` m •, z J Roun -� Lake --------2 --'------- •� R • - - - — -- AVE-N---- ' - 120TH ST N - - - 120TH ST N 120TH ST N - -- CITY of Project Location Map N 5 Year CIP 0 3,000 wsb, EST. 1906 Hugo MN Feet 1 inch = 3,000 feet