HomeMy WebLinkAbout2021.03.01 CC PacketMeeting will be held remotely pursuant to MN Statute Sec. 13D.021. Anyone who wishes to
speak at the meeting is strongly encouraged to make arrangements by 4:30 p.m. on the
meeting day by contacting City Clerk Michele Lindau at 651-762-6315.For more information
on the remote meeting and participation, go to https://www.ci.hugo.mn.us/participate.
ZOOM Meeting ID: 814 3973 9401
Passcode: 523083
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL
C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. February 1, 2021, City Council Meeting
2. February 23, 2021, Lions Park Pavilion Design Workshop
3. February 24, 2021, Neighborhood Meeting on Downtown Street Improvement Project
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Update on COVID-19 City Response
2. Parks Commission Annual Report
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council
and will be enacted by one motion and a roll call vote. If a member of the City Council or
the public wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
will be considered separately.
1. Approve Claims Roster
2. Approve Performance Review for Building Department Secretary Debi Close
3. Approve Performance Review for Senior Engineering Technician Liz Finnegan
4. Approve Property Line Adjustment for Marvin and Judith LaValle and Hugo
Investments. LLC (Larry Barnabo) for Properties Located at the Northwest and
Southwest Corners of Frenchman Road (CSAH 8) and Forest Boulevard (TH 61)
5. Approve Promotion of David Jensen to Deputy Chief on the Hugo Fire Department
6. Approve Resolutions Approving the Preliminary Plat, Planned Unit Development,
and Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Meadows at Hugo Development
7. Approve Donation to the Hugo Fire Department from the Hugo American Legion
8. Approve Authorization to Advertise for Dust Control
Agenda
HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
HUGO CITY HALL/REMOTE MEETING
MONDAY, MARCH 1, 2021 – 7 P.M.
9. Approve Hiring of Chuck Preisler as Temporary Building Inspector
10. Approve Pay Request No. 5 from Ebert Construction for Public Works Facility
11. Approve Ordinance Amending Fine for Parking Violation
H. PUBLIC HEARING
1. Public Hearing on Ordering Improvements and Authorization to Prepare Plans and
Specifications for the 2021 Downtown Improvement Project
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Approve ROW Acquisition Agreements
2. Approve Local Road Improvement Program Grant Application
3. Update on February 23, 2021, Lions Park Workshop
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Approve 121st Street Development Sketch Plan
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. No presentations scheduled
L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Update on Yellow Ribbon Network
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Schedule Board of Appeal and Equalization for Thursday, April 8, 2021
N. ADJOURN
BACKGROUND MEMO FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON MARCH 1, 2021
D.1 Minutes for the February 1, 2021, City Council Meeting
D.2 Minutes for the February 23, 2021, Lions Park Pavilion Design Workshop
D.3 Minutes for the February 24, 2021, Neighborhood Meeting on Downtown Street Poject
Staff recommends Council approve the above minutes as presented.
F.1 Update on COVID-19 City Response
City Administrator Bryan Bear will provide an update on the City’s response to the COVID-19
pandemic
F.2 Parks Commission Annual Report
Parks Planner Shayla Denaway will present to Council the 2020 Parks Commission Annual
Report.
G. 1 Approve Claims Roster
Staff recommends Council approve the Claims Roster as presented.
G.2 Approve Performance Review for Building Department Secretary Debi Close
Debi Close was hired as the City’s Building Department Receptionist on March 20, 2006.
Building Official Joel Hoistad recommends Council approve the annual performance review for
Building Department Receptionist Debi Close.
G.3 Approve Performance Review for Senior Engineering Technician Liz Finnegan
Liz Finnegan was hired in March, 2019, as the new Senior Engineering Technician after the
retirement of Steve Duff in January, 2018. City Administrator Bryan Bear recommends Council
approve the performance review for Senior Engineering Technician Liz Finnegan.
G.4 Approve Property Line Adjustment for Marvin and Judith LaValle and Hugo
Investments. LLC (Larry Barnabo) for Properties Located at the Northwest and Southwest
Corners of Frenchman Road (CSAH 8) and Forest Boulevard (TH 61)
Marvin and Judith LaValle and Hugo Investments. LLC (Larry Barnabo) are requesting approval
of a property line adjustment for the properties located at the northwest and southwest corners of
Frenchman Road (CSAH 8) and Forest Boulevard (TH 61). The applicant is proposing to adjust
the common property line between the properties and combine them into two parcels. This
adjustment will result in Parcel A totaling 4.97 acres and Parcel B totaling 16.09 acres. Staff
finds that both properties are in compliance with all applicable regulations in the City Code and
will continue to comply after the property line adjustment. Staff recommends approval of the
attached resolution approving a property line adjustment for Marvin and Judith LaValle and
Hugo Investments, LLC (Larry Barnabo).
G.5 Approve Promotion of David Jensen to Deputy Chief on the Hugo Fire Department
Interviews were held on February 4, 2021, for a new Deputy Chief. The position became vacant
when former Deputy Chief Jim Compton, Jr. was promoted to the Fire Chief position. Staff
recommends Council approve the promotion of David Jensen to Deputy Chief on the Hugo Fire
Department effective March 1, 2021.
G.6 Approve Resolutions Approving the Preliminary Plat, Planned Unit Development, and
Comprehensive Plan Amendment for the Meadows at Hugo Development
Golden Valley Land Company has applied for a preliminary plat, planned unit development, and
comprehensive plan amendment for a residential development to be known as “The Meadows at
Hugo.” The proposed site is 32.93 acres and is located north of 159th Street North and west of
Highway 61. The preliminary plat proposes a total of 87 single family lots and six outlots. At
their February 11, 2021 meeting, the Hugo Planning Commission held a public hearing and
considered the request. There were two residents who spoke during the meeting as well as a few
who provided written comments prior to the meeting. The comments generally included
concerns on the increased traffic from the proposal and the reduced setback requirements. The
Planning Commission generally likes the layout and unanimously found that the applicants meet
all requirements necessary for approval. The Planning Commission recommend that the City
Council approve the preliminary plat, planned unit development, and comprehensive plan
amendment applications for the residential development to be known as the Meadows at Hugo.
G.7 Approve Donation to the Hugo Fire Department from the Hugo American Legion
The Hugo American Legion would like to donate $2,100 to the Hugo Fire Department for
training and equipment. Donations to the Fire Department must be approved by Council. Staff
recommends Council approve the donation of$2,100 to the Hugo Fire Department from the Hugo
American Legion.
G.8 Approve Authorization to Advertise for Dust Control
Staff is requesting authorization from the City Council to advertise for bids for the City's 2021
gravel road dust control project. The City of Hugo currently applies dust control to
approximately 28 miles of gravel roads located within its municipal boundaries. Following City
Council approval, staff will advertise and solicit bids through the City newspaper and will hold a
bid opening in early April. This will be followed by the Council considering bids in April. The
dust control/stabilization would be applied in two separate applications, once in mid -May and
again in early to mid -August. Staff recommends approval to advertise for bids for the City's
2021 gravel road dust control project.
G.9 Approve Hiring of Chuck Preisler as Temporary Building Inspector
Staff has been meeting with former Building Official Chuck Preisler on the possibility of
working part-time on an as needed basis in the Building Department to assist with plan review
and inspection duties. The Building Department is expected to be busy again this year. Staff is
requesting the City Council approve the hiring of Chuck Preisler as a part-time building
inspector, on an as needed basis as determined by the Building Official, at a pay rate of $50.00
per hour plus mileage.
G.10 Approve Pay Request No. 5 from Ebert Construction for Public Works Facility
Ebert Construction has submitted Pay Voucher No. 5 for work done on the new Public Works
facility. Staff has reviewed the pay voucher and finds it acceptable for work certified through
February 2021. Staff recommends Council approve Pay Voucher No. 5 to Ebert Construction in
the amount of $15,198.90.
G.11 Approve Ordinance Amending Fine for Parking Violation
In November of 1990, Council established a $25 fine for those who violated the City’s parking
regulations. This fee has remained in place since then. In an effort to create a stronger
disincentive for overnight parking that impedes snow plowing, staff would like to increase this
fine to $50. Staff recommends Council approve the ordinance amending the City Code, Section
90-253, Parking and Loading, to include violation of the ordinance will result in a petty
misdemeanor fine of $50.
H.1 Public Hearing on Ordering Improvements and Authorization to Prepare Plans and
Specifications for the 2021 Downtown Improvement Project
The feasibility study had been received by the City Council at the February 1, 2021 City Council
meeting. City Council set the public hearing for the 2021 Downtown Improvement Project for
the March 1, 2021 City Council meeting. Staff held a neighborhood meeting on February 24th to
share the results of the feasibility study with property owners adjacent to the project in advance
of the public hearing. Total project costs for the 2021 Downtown Improvement Project are
estimated to be $3,656,800. Staff will present the findings of the Feasibility Report as part of the
public hearing process. Staff recommends approval of the resolution ordering the project and
authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the 2021 Downtown Improvement
Project.
I.1 Approve ROW Acquisition Agreements
In preparation of the feasibility study for the 2021 Downtown Improvement Project, staff has
identified both permanent and temporary easements for a number of properties along 147th Street
and Fitzgerald Avenue. Staff has met with property owners regarding the project, provided
them with renderings of the proposed improvements, and discussed potential concerns. Staff is
requesting that the City Council approve a resolution authorizing the offer presentation on the
parcels to the property owners and to acquire the property areas needed either by negotiation or
condemnation for the Downtown Redevelopment Project.
I.2 Approve Local Road Improvement Program Grant Application
The Local Roads Improvement Program (LRIP) was established by the Minnesota Legislature in
2002. The legislature recently provided $75,000,000 for LRIP for county, state aid cities, non-
state aid cities, and townships. Staff believes the reconstruction and extension of 147th Street to
Oneka Parkway is a good candidate for one of the eligible categories related to Routes of
Regional Significance. Funds can be used for constructing or reconstructing city streets, county
highways, or town roads with statewide or regional significance. Our application is seeking the
maximum request value of $1,250,000. Staff has requested and received a letter of support from
Washington County for our Local Road Improvement Program Application for 147th Street. The
grant application is due on March 3, 2021, with the announcement of award of funds occurring in
May of 2021. Award of our 20121 Downtown Improvement Project contract cannot occur until
after the selection process has occurred. Staff recommends approval of the resolution
authorizing the submission of Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP) grant application for
147th Street Reconstruction and Extension to Oneka Parkway as part of the 2021 Downtown
Improvement Project.
I.3 Update on February 23, 2021, Lions Park Workshop
The Council held a workshop on February 23, 2021, to discuss the proposed design of the new
pavilion at Lions Park. City Administrator Bryan Bear will provide an update.
J.1 Approve 121st Street Development Sketch Plan
Drengson May Enterprises, LLC has applied for the sketch plan applicant for informal comments
on plans to subdivide three parcels of land to create parcels that are 1 acre or more. The plan
shows 10 proposed residential lots, stormwater ponding areas, streets, and utilities. The sketch
plan was completed to get comments from the Planning Commission, Parks Commission, and
City Council prior to moving forward with the formal development approval process. The
Planning Commission and Parks Commission reviewed the sketch plan and provided comments
to the applicant as outlined in the staff report. Staff recommends the City Council provide
informal feedback to the applicant on the sketch plan.
L.1 Update on Yellow Ribbon Network
Council Member Chuck Haas will report to Council on the Yellow Ribbon Network activities
held recently.
M.1 Schedule Board of Appeal and Equalization for Thursday, April 8, 2021
Washington County would like the City to hold its Local Board of Appeals and Equalization
meeting on Thursday, April 8, 2021, in the Oneka Room from 5:30 – 6:30 p.m. at Hugo City
Hall. The County has noticed this as an in-person meeting. Council may want to consider
holding this as a hybrid meeting. Staff recommends Council approve the date of Thursday, April
8, 2021 for the Local Board of Appeals and Equalization.
N.1 Adjournment
Meeting was held remotely pursuant to MN Statute Sec. 13D.021.
ZOOM Meeting ID: 867 2267 3276
Passcode: 440628
Call to Order
Mayor Weidt called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
COUNCIL PRESENT REMOTELY: Haas, Klein, Miron, Petryk, Weidt
OTHERS PRESENT REMOTELY: City Attorney Dave Snyder, City Engineer Mark Erichson,
Finance Director Ron Otkin, Community Development Director Rachel Juba, Community
Development Assistant Emily Weber, Parks Planner Shayla Denaway, Senior Engineering
Technician Liz Finnegan
PRESENT AT CITY HALL: City Administrator Bryan Bear, City Clerk Michele Lindau
Moment of Silence for Mike Gibbs
Hass asked for a moment of silence for long-time Hugo resident Mike Gibbs. Mike was a church
member, American Legion member, and a member of the Hugo Police Department before it
merged with Washington County. He then became a Washington County Deputy and retired a
few years ago. Mike was 70 years old.
Approval of Minutes for the January 4, 2021 City Council Meeting
Klein made motion, Petryk seconded, to approve the minutes for the City Council meeting held
on January 4, 2021, as presented.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
Approval of Minutes for the January 19, 2021 Council Goal Setting
Klein made motion, Miron seconded, to approve the minutes for the Goal Setting Session held
on January 19, 2021, as presented.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
Approval of Minutes for the January 25, 2021 Commission Interviews
Petryk made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the minutes for the Commissioner Interviews
held on January 25, 2021, as presented.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
Minutes
HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING
HUGO CITY HALL/REMOTE MEETING
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 1, 2021 – 7 P.M.
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for February 1, 2021
Page 2 of 9
Approval of Agenda
Weidt made motion, Miron seconded, to approve the agenda as presented.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
Update on COVID-19 City Response and Approval of Hybrid Meeting Protocols
City Administrator Bryan Bear provided an update on the City’s response to the COVID
pandemic. Washington County had received many applications for the $5 million dollars they
had available for relief grants, and they may need to prioritize. Bear encouraged businesses to
join the Hugo Business Association where updates are given. Memberships are free for 2021,
and they can attend by coming to the Oneka Room at City Hall or via zoom. City Hall remained
open, and all services were available with modifications. Some staff continued to work remotely.
The majority of building improvements had been completed including technology upgrades that
allow for hybrid meeting, though Council meetings were continuing remotely as allowed by
statute. Washington County and Minnesota Department of Health had been collaborating on a
strategy for vaccine distribution. First responders had been vaccinated with both shots.
Community Development Annual Report
Community Development Assistant Emily Weber provided the Community Development
Annual Report. She began with Met Council’s annual population estimates for Hugo that
showed 15,388 residents and 5,920 households. There were a total of 55 planning applications in
2020, which was an increase from 2019. Most applications were for PUD or preliminary and
final plat approval. There were 165 permits issued for single family homes and 72 for multi-
family that included Rosemary Apartment (45 units) and two of the Hugo Garden Apartment
buildings. Five more buildings will be constructed in 2021. There was a total of 3,924
inspections conducted by the Building Department, including inspection being done in Scandia.
There were 244 single family lots available in Hugo at the end of 2020 and no multi-family lots.
Foreclosures were considerably down to two in 2020. There were five large construction projects
in 2020 totaling 62,000 square feet valued at $11.5 million. Weber provided some details on the
larger commercial projects. Upcoming projects in 2021were the new White Bear Lake
elementary school, development of the City owned property on Egg Lake, and the Oneka Place
5th Addition, Adelaide Landing 6th Addition, Meadows at Hugo, and Rice Lake Reserve
Developments.
Approval of Consent Agenda
Weidt made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the following consent agenda:
1. Approve Claims Roster
2. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Neal Nelson
3. Approve Advertisement for Public Works Summer Seasonal Workers
4. Approve Purchase of New Radios for the Hugo Fire Department
5. Approve Cindy Petty as Alternate Member of Planning Commission
6. Approve Cindy Petty as Member of the Board of Zoning and Appeals
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for February 1, 2021
Page 3 of 9
7. Approve Mike Roberts and John Chrun as Members of the EDA and Neil Arcand as
Alternate Member
8. Approve Emily McGinnity as Member of Parks Commission and Meredith St. Pierre as
Alternate Member
9. Approve Jason Arcand as Member of the Historical Commission
10. Approve Reduction in Cash Escrow for Hugo Gardens
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
Approve Claims Roster
Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Claims Roster as presented.
Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Neal Nelson
Neal Nelson was hired on January 3, 2017, as a Public Works Worker. Adoption of the Consent
Agenda approved the Annual Performance Review for Neal Nelson.
Approve Advertisement for Public Works Summer Seasonal Workers
Staff had requested authorization to advertise and hire a total of six seasonal employees for the
Public Works Department. In the 2021 General Fund Budget, Council approved the six seasonal
positions to assist with mowing, garbage/litter removal, park maintenance, boulevard and general
Public Works maintenance. A starting hourly wage of $12.00/hour was approved in the 2021
General Fund Budget for these positions. These positions will not exceed 40 hours per week.
Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the advertisement for Public Works Summer
Seasonal Workers.
Approve Purchase of New Radios for the Hugo Fire Department
Included in the City’s 2021 budget was funding for the purchase of eight new portable radios for
the Fire Department. The new radios would replace eight model XTL2600 radios which would
become obsolete in 2021. The radios being purchased were eight Motorola APX6000 radios for a
total cost of $31,246. After this year, seven mobile radios will need to be replaced in 2022 and
then all of the radios that the department has would be up to date. The cost of the new radios
was as expected and staff had budgeted appropriately for the replacement. Adoption of the
Consent Agenda approved the purchase of eight portable Motorola APX6000 radios through the
State of Minnesota contract, from ANCOM.
Approve Cindy Petty as Alternate Member of Planning Commission
On January 25, 2021, Council interviewed nine residents to fill Commission vacancies. Cindy
had been selected to be an alternate member of the Planning Commission. Adoption of the
Consent Agenda approved the appointment of Cindy Petty as a Planning Commission alternate
for a three year term ending December 31, 2023.
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for February 1, 2021
Page 4 of 9
Approve Cindy Petty as Member of the Board of Zoning and Appeals
On January 25, 2021, Council interviewed nine residents to fill Commission vacancies. Cindy
Petty had been selected to serve on the Board of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments. Members of
BOZA were appointed annually. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the appointment of
Cindy Petty to the Board of Zoning Appeals and Adjustments with a term ending on December
31, 2021.
Approve Mike Roberts and John Chrun as Members of the EDA and Neil Arcand as
Alternate Member
On January 25, 2021, Council interviewed nine residents to fill Commission vacancies. Mike
Roberts and John Chrun had been selected to serve on the Economic Development Authority,
and Neil Arcand had been selected as an alternate member. Adoption of the Consent Agenda
approved the appointment of Mike Roberts to serve on the EDA with a term ending December
31, 2026, John Chrun to serve on the EDA with a term ending December 31, 2024, and Neil
Arcand to serve as an alternate member on the EDA with a term ending December 31, 2023.
Approve Emily McGinnity as Member of Parks Commission and Meredith St. Pierre as
Alternate Member
On January 25, 2021, Council interviewed nine residents to fill Commission vacancies. Emily
McGinnity had been selected to serve as a member of the Parks Commission and Meredith St.
Pierre had been selected to serve as an alternate. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the
appointment of Emily McGinnity as a Parks Commission Member with a term ending on
December 31, 2023, and Meredith St. Pierre as an Alternate Parks Commission Member with a
term ending on December 31, 2023.
Approve Jason Arcand as Member of the Historical Commission
On January 25, 2021, Council interviewed nine residents to fill Commission vacancies. Jason
Arcand had been selected to serve as a member of the Historical Commission Adoption of the
Consent Agenda approved the appointment of Jason Arcand as a Historical Commission Member
with a term ending on December 31, 2021.
Approve Reduction in Cash Escrow for Hugo Gardens
The Hugo Gardens Project had grading and utility work completed to date and the Hugo Garden
Apartments, LLC. had requested a reduction in the Cash Escrow. The current amount of cash
escrow for the Hugo Gardens Project was in the amount of $2,405,409. Staff had inspected the
work completed to date and found it acceptable. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the
reduction in cash escrow to $2,160,007 based on the value of work remaining to be completed.
Approve 2021 City Focus Goals and Ongoing Priorities
The Council held a workshop on January 18, 2021, to set goals and ongoing priorities for 2021.
City Administrator Bryan Bear reviewed the list compiled by staff stating there would be a major
focus on projects in and around downtown Hugo with the redevelopment of Lions Park,
infrastructure improvements including the reconstruction of City streets, and the extension of
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for February 1, 2021
Page 5 of 9
147th Street. There was also a purchase agreement for the City owned property along Highway
61, and the City will be doing a water reuse project on CSAH 8. The City will be exploring
potential staffing needs at the Fire Department and evaluating staffing needs at the Sheriff’s
Department. Bear stated that staff also anticipated spending time managing the COVID-19
Pandemic.
Klein made motion, Petryk seconded, to approve the 2021 City Focus Goals and Ongoing
Priorities.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried
Approve Lions Park Pavilion and Park Design and Authorize Construction Documents
City Administrator Bryan Bear began by explaining how the next three agenda items were
interconnected and asked Council to consider each one individually but recommended
proceeding with all these projects together. Lions Park redevelopment, street and parking
improvements, and the stormwater reuse project were all dependent on each other and involved
several funding sources. Bear stated it would be a priority to keep things moving and on
schedule.
Planner Shayla Denaway provided background on work done on the redevelopment of Lions
Park. At the City Council meeting of October 5, 2020, proposals from WSB and Associates and
HCM Architects were approved to develop the design of Lions Park to 50%. A community
workshop was held on October 12, 2020. At the City Council meeting of October 19, 2020,
three stakeholder committees were formed to design the playground, pavilion, and overall park
site. At the meeting of January 20, 2021, the Parks Commission reviewed the committees’
recommendations and recommended Council review and approve the Lions Park pavilion and
park designs. Proposals were received from WSB and HCM to draft construction documents,
and the Parks Commission recommended Council authorize this.
Matt Lysne with HCM Architects presented the design for the pavilion and layout showing how
the City Hall parking lot was redesigned with the new park building at the west end. Key
features were the axis arrangement with the parking lot, City Hall and the large gathering space
all in alignment. He showed the building layout and explained how it flowed with entry out to
pavilion, garden spaces, and playground structures. There was a large community gathering
room that would seat around 120 people. A catering service room with windows was shown
connected to the gathering room that would also be accessible from outside. The building had
large windows facing east and large doors to the north. There were also doors opening to the
west that led into an outdoor seating area. The lobby would act as a hub to a small and a large
meeting room. He showed where the mechanical room, janitor’s room, large storage room, and
restrooms were located and explained there would also be restrooms at the west end of the
building with only outdoor access. There was also a large picnic shelter attached to the building.
Lysne showed the building elevations and color renderings pointing out there would be a lot of
windows to let light in. The exterior would be red brick and limestone similar to City Hall.
There would be light gray metal panel components on the sides of the building and white framed
windows. The large overhang on the north side of the building would have a wood ceiling to
bring in warmer tones.
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for February 1, 2021
Page 6 of 9
Petryk asked about the shedding of snow and ice on the sloped roof and the roof warranty.
Lysne explained there were oversized roof drains that connect to the stormwater system and
secondary overflow drain outlets that would run if the primary drain was plugged. He said they
typically recommend a 20-year roof at a minimum.
Klein asked about outside electrical outlets, maintenance of exterior wood materials, and quality
of windows. Lysne showed where the outlets were located stating they would be secured with
locks. There would be water service to the outside of the building that the public would not have
access to turn on. Lysne explained the exterior would be prefinished materials made for the
climate that would need to be on a ten-year maintenance plan. He stated double paned windows
were in the budget, but they could look at the cost of triple panes.
Petryk asked about heating and cooling costs and efficiencies. Lysne replied that it was designed
to have modern heating and air, but he had not worked up any utility costs related to the building.
Petryk questioned how this particular design was selected because she was envisioning a much
more traditional design with a rural character. Lysne replied that three design ideas went to the
steering committee, and this was a modified design with their guidance.
Klein said it would be prudent to see how triple pane windows could help heating and cooling
costs.
Miron asked about the capacity on the rooms, and Denaway replied it would be nearly double the
size of Hugo’s current community rooms.
Petryk asked if they had the opportunity to look at the other designs saying she was surprised by
the modern look of the building. Weidt replied that this was the design approved by the steering
committee.
Klein said he liked that it was a little of old with new and thought the steering committee did a
nice job.
Lysne reviewed the building cost that included the main pavilion, exterior covered space, and
picnic shelter. The cost was $2,639,175 plus a 7.5% contingency to deal with supply change
interruptions for a total cost of $2,837,113. These numbers did not include furniture, AV,
security, and low voltage cabling and devices. He emphasized that commercial construction had
been hit hard by COVID, and since the cost estimate was done at the end of 2020, there was no
construction escalation costs included for 2021. If the project went out to 2022, he anticipated a
construction escalation cost of 8% ($211,000).
Candace Amberg with WSB and Associates presented an updated site plan showing the parking
lot design, trails that were a mixture of bituminous outlining the park and concrete within the
park, and how those trails connected to existing trails. Also shown on the plan were playground,
plaza, and seating areas. In the northwest corner of the park, there was an area for an optional
parking lot with an opportunity to create a focal point. A spot designated for courts and a skate
park was shown on the northeast corner, and Amberg talked about possible uses for the large
open space in the center. She presented options for benches, retaining walls, planting areas, etc.
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for February 1, 2021
Page 7 of 9
Miron talked about the feedback on the playground committee regarding the importance of
having areas for all ages and spaces to be able to supervise and feel comfortable. Miron stated
he felt good use was made of the space.
Candice reviewed cost for general park construction, utilities, site development, pavilion plaza
spaces, inclusive playground, City Hall parking lot, and site landscape and restoration. She
provided an estimated total of $4,235,563, which included a 10% contingency and other fees.
She also provide numbers for alternate work that included a sports court area, parking lot area on
the northwest corner, and pedestrian park lighting.
Denaway provided a summary of the cost estimates. The park was estimated at $4.2 million,
pavilion at $2.8 million, and another $800,000 for alternates. Also estimated was $350,000 for
architect fees, pavilion technology and furniture. She provided the next steps in the process
which were to draft the construction documents, bid and determine funding in April and May,
and begin construction after Good Neighbor Days in mid-June. Proposals were received from
WSB and HCM Architects for the next phase that included drafting final construction
documents, bidding management, and construction administration. The Parks Commission had
reviewed the plans and cost estimates at their last meeting and recommended Council approve
the park site plan and pavilion design and authorize drafting of the construction documents.
Miron agreed with Petryk that the pavilion design was different than what he expected but said
he trusted the judgement of the Parks Commission and the steering committee. He questioned
the impact of the levy, tax rate, and financing aspect. Bear replied that the discussion of bonding
would take place once all the numbers were in. He suggested Council discuss the alternates and
decide whether to draft those construction documents as well. Miron stated it may be
advantageous to see where the bids come in. Haas agreed with Miron.
Klein stated that he thought it made sense to put it all into one package and eliminate alternates if
necessary. He said interest rates were extremely low right now, and it may be a good opportunity
to do this project in its entirety.
Klein made motion, Miron seconded, to approve the Lions Park pavilion design and authorize
drafting of construction documents including alternates.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried
Approve Feasibility and Set Public Hearing for the 2021 Downtown Improvement Project
City Engineer Mark Erichson review the proposed 2021 downtown improvement project which
consisted of the extension of 147th Street from Finale Avenue to Oneka Parkway, turn lanes on
Oneka Parkway, reconstruction of 147th Street from just west of TH 61 to Finale Avenue, Flay
Avenue north of 147th Street, Upper 146th Street, 146th Street, Finley Avenue, and Fitzgerald
Avenue. Erichson explained how the street improvements, the stormwater reuse project, and
improvements to Lions Park needed to be coordinated and done together. He provide a proposed
project schedule and requested Council accept the feasibility report and set the public hearing for
March 1, 2021. Bidding for the project would be done in May and construction would occur
June-November. The assessment hearing would take place in October or November. Erichson
provided background and reviewed how the roadway and trails were in alignment with the City’s
Comprehensive Plan. He talked about the importance of coordinating the road project with the
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for February 1, 2021
Page 8 of 9
park improvement project, the Hugo Gardens project, and the CSAH8 stormwater reuse project
to address drainage and stormwater. He provided details on the proposed improvements stating
they were working on right-of-way needs and were working with the landowners and waiting for
appraisals. The projected costs for the project was $3,656,800 and would be paid with City
funding, state aid funding, and assessments. He informed Council the City was applying for a
grant through the Local Road Improvement Program for $1.25 million. Erichson reviewed the
assessment process and the City’s assessment policy.
Klein made motion, Haas seconded, to approve RESOLUTION 2021- 7 RECEIVING THE
FEASIBILITY REPORT AND SETTING THE PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE 2021
DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried
CSAH 8 Water Reuse Update and Authorize Final Design
City Engineer Mark Erichson explained the CSAH 8 Stormwater Reuse System would reconnect
irrigation systems, serving 22 acres along CSAH 8, Lions Park, Keystone Place, Hugo Gardens,
and City Hall. This would result in improved surface water quality through phosphorus
reduction, decreased groundwater demand, and volume reduction. The CSAH 8 reuse system
will pump water from the stormwater pond located in the NE quadrant of CSAH 8 and Oneka
Parkway to the existing and future irrigation systems, conserving an estimated 14-16 million
gallons of water annually. The project cost was estimated to be $729,000. The City had
received funding totaling $542,400 to date, with an additional $76,000 grant still pending. If
that was received, the City’s cost would be $110,600.
Haas made motion, Miron seconded, to authorize the preparation of plans and specifications for
the CSAH 8 Water Reuse Project.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried
Update on the Yellow Ribbon Network
Council Member Chuck Haas reported to Council on the Yellow Ribbon Network activities held
recently. The YRN had received donations of a motorized wheelchair and hospital bed. The
Family Assistant Center contacted the YRN to help get transitional housing for family in crisis.
He thanked the Forest Lake Rotary for setting up a GoFundMe page for their care package event
resulting in $700 in donations that helped pay for postage. The YRN had received many “thank
yous” from the Secret Santa families. Breakfast was provided by the YRN to the 133rd Air Wing
soldiers who were being deployed to Washington, DC. Haas was interviewed on Military Radio
Hour where the YRN was featured. He asked people to tune into the podcast to hear the YRN
story.
Cancel Second Meeting in February Due to President’s Day Holiday
Annually, the President’s Day Holiday falls on the same day as the second Council meeting in
February and would need to be cancelled or rescheduled. City Administrator Bryan Bear
informed Council that staff did not anticipate any items for that meeting agenda and
recommended Council cancel the February 15, 2021, meeting.
Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for February 1, 2021
Page 9 of 9
Klein made motion, Weidt seconded, to cancel the regularly scheduled Council meeting of
February 15, 2021.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried
Approve 2021 Citywide Cleanup Dates for April 17 and October 2
City Administrator Bryan Bear informed Council staff had worked with Washington County to
secure the dates for the spring and fall citywide cleanup. He recommended Council approve
Saturday, April 17 and Saturday, October 2, 2021
Miron made motion, Klein seconded, to approve Saturday, April 17 and Saturday, October 2 for
the 2021, Citywide Cleanup Days.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried
Adjournment
Klein made motion, Haas seconded, to adjourn at 9:42 p.m.
Roll call vote – all ayes. Motion carried.
Respectfully Submitted,
Michele Lindau
City Clerk
Meeting was held remotely pursuant to MN Statute Sec. 13D.021.
ZOOM Meeting ID: 883 8889 0299
Waiting room enabled
COUNCIL PRESENT REMOTELY: Haas, Klein, Miron, Petryk, Weidt
OTHERS PRESENT AT CITY HALL: City Administrator Bryan Bear, Public Works Director
Scott Anderson, Community Development Director Rachel Juba, Parks Planner Shayla
Denaway, Community Development Assistant Emily Webber
OTHERS PRESENT REMOTELY: HCM Architects
Matt Lysne with HCM Architects presented a summary of the work of the Lions Park pavilion
sub-committee. The Council reviewed and discussed the building form and options for exterior
materials.
The meeting adjourned at approximately 4:45 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Shayla Denaway
Parks Planner
Minutes
HUGO CITY COUNCIL
PARK PAVILION WORKSHOP
HUGO CITY HALL/REMOTE MEETING
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 2021 – 3:00 P.M
Meeting was held remotely pursuant to MN Statute Sec. 13D.021.
ZOOM Meeting ID: 949 2596 6707
Passcode: 349820
COUNCIL PRESENT REMOTELY: Klein, Miron, Petryk, Weidt
COUNCIL ABSENT: Haas
OTHERS PRESENT: City Engineer Mark Erichson, Senior Engineering Technician Liz
Finnegan
The Hugo City Council attended a neighborhood meeting on Wednesday, February 24 at 6 p.m.
to discuss the 2021 Downtown Improvement Project. The meeting began with a presentation by
City Engineer Mark Erichson. The presentation covered project details, the feasibility study
findings, estimated project cost and the City assessment policy. The presentation was followed
by a question and answer session.
The meeting adjourned at approximately 6:30 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Liz Finnegan
Senior Engineering Technician
Minutes
HUGO CITY COUNCIL
WORKSHOP ON STREET PROJECT
HUGO CITY HALL/REMOTE MEETING
WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 24, 2021 – 6:00 P.M.
Contact Us
(651) 762-6300
Hugo City Hall
14669 Fitzgerald Avenue
North
Hugo, MN 55038
Staff Liaison:
Shayla Denaway
(651) 762-6342
Visit us on the web at
www.ci.hugo.mn.us
Development Projects
Oneka Commons Sketch Plan
At the January 19 meeting, the Commission reviewed a sketch plan for Oneka
Commons, located south of CR 8. As of the end of 2020, the developers have not
indicated that they will be moving forward with the mixed-use project.
Hugo Gardens
At their May 20 meeting, the Parks Commission accepted park dedication for 84
apartment units in in seven buildings located west of Lions Park called “Hugo Gar-
dens”. The park dedication fee of $87,414 was calculated with consideration of
the 2.11 acres of land previously dedicated in the LaValle Fields PUD. Cosntruc-
tion on the roads and utilities started in fall 2020.
Oneka Lake Reserve
At the July 15 meeting, park dedication was approved for Oneka Lake Reserve
that included .65 acres of park land and $26,400 in fees. The developer proposed
to construct amenities on the small park, located off of 150th Street, including a
gazebo, small playground, picnic tables, and sidewalk track. Construction was not
started in 2020.
Hugo Garden Apartment Renderings
PARKS REPORT
Commissioners:
Dave Strub, Chair
Cathy Moore-Arcand, Vice Chair
Nicole Schmid
Roger Clarke
Mat Rauschendorfer
Ranell Tennyson
Shawn Haag
Arcand Park Playground (Photo by Ultimate Recreation)
Arcand Park Opened
The Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission opened a new neighborhood park in 2020, now named Arcand Park.
The Adelaide Landing residential development was first conceptualized in 2016. Construction of this new neighborhood
park in the Hugo system was made possible through park dedication. The Parks Commission accepted 7.7 acres of land
and $1,128 per unit in fees for the residential development of 324 homes. The park was master planned in 2019 and
envisioned to serve the adjacent neighborhoods, as well as Adelaide Landing, with more recreation amenities offered than
typical Hugo neighborhood parks. Features of the park include a sizable playground, a large-capacity park shelter, two pick-
leball courts, basketball half-court, open play field, and an off-road paved trail network.
Neighborhood Selects Playground
In the spring of 2020, residents were invited to vote on four playground options. Through two virtual meetings and social
media, valuable input was gathered from residents. A playground was selected that featured a zipline, climbing net, toddler
play area, swings, and slide structure was selected from Ultimate Recreation, a vendor not used in Hugo parks before.
Park Named in Honor of Former Property Owners
Residents also submitted their ideas for a name for the new park. The City Council selected “Arcand Park” in honor of
Arthur Arcand, the former owner and farmer of the property. A grand opening was held on October 7. The warm, sunny
weather allowed for great participation in the celebration and appropriate social distancing.
ANNUAL REPORT OF THE PARKS, RECREATION, AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION 2020
Goodveiw Avenue Trail Study
The City of Hugo was awarded a $10,000 Active Living Partnership from Living
Healthy Washington County, through the Statewide Health Improvement Program.
With the funding, studying the feasibility of a priority trail corridor along Goodview
Avenue was made possible. The study was authorized by May 4 Parks Commis-
sion meeting. The road has wetlands on both sides which were delineated. This
informed the trail concepts presented by WSB and Associates at the August 19
meeting. The concepts included an alternate on-road route on Geneva for the
northern segment versus a trail on Goodview. For the southern segment, trails on
both sides or a wider trail on the west side of the road were presented as options.
The Commission’s preference was presented at their September 16 meeting of an
8’ wide trail with 5’ wide boulevard on the west side of the entire corridor. Cost
estimates were provided. The Commission voted to accepted Goodview Avenue
Feasibility Study but did not recommend construction at this time.
Covid-19 Response
As the Covid-19 pandemic arose in spring 2020, use and attention to Hugo’s
parks and trails system grew. However, the majority of the programs and special
events that the City offers were cancelled, including the Tour de Hugo. As people
were instructed to stay at home and away from others, outdoor recreation became
a safe outlet for many. Use of Hugo’s network of trails and sidewalks increased.
Additional attention was paid to Hugo’s playgrounds. While a few cities opted to
“close” playgrounds, Hugo’s playgrounds remained open. The Mayor Tom Weidt
put out this message to Hugo’s park users in March and it has continued to be
impactful through the end of 2020:
Within our parks, areas such as playgrounds, picnic tables, sport courts, and the skate park
can be difficult to use safely and follow the CDC’s recommendations. Many residents are
choosing to avoid these areas all together. There are some residents that may be upset that
parks have not been closed. There are other residents that would ignore any order to not
use them. Every time you choose to go somewhere, pause to think about the risks that you
are taking for you and your neighborhood. If you choose to proceed, be sure to follow the
Governor’s guidelines. Everyone is counting on you to use good judgement. As I have said
before, take seriously the direction to stay at home and practice social distancing with those
around you. Please do your best to be a good neighbor. Share what you can, help them
when you can, and we will make it through this as safely as possible.
JD 3 Project
The Rice Creek Watershed District
(RCWD) started a ditch maintenance
project in 2020 that impacted several
city-owned properties, trails, and
parks.
As the Drainage Authority, RCWD is
required to maintain a network of
Judicial Ditches. This includes JD 3
which goes through the Victor
Gardens neighborhood and Clearwa-
ter Creek Preserve adjacent to City
trails. JD 3 also extends north near
Oneka Parkway through Frog Hollow
Park and beyond.
The work included removal of vegeta-
tion and trees to allow for a mainte-
nance corridor, excavation of the
channel, and culvert replacement.
Construction is on going and addition-
al restoration is anticipated to happen
in 2021.
Signage Placed in Hugo Parks in Spring 2020
Ditch in Clearwater Creek Preserve
Ditch near Frog Hollow Park
Andrew Olson
Memorial
At the July 15 meeting,
the Parks Commission
approved a memorial to
be installed in Oneka
Lake Park in honor of
Andrew Olson. Olson
passed away unexpect-
edly in February 2020.
Logan Jensen requested
the memorial in honor of
his late friend and fellow
Boy Scout which
includes a tree, bench,
and plaque.
Public Works
Facility Under
Construction
at Irish Avenue
Park
The existing Public Works
Facility is in need of
expansion. Following a
feasibility study, the
Council directed staff to
look into construction of a
new facility at Irish Ave-
nue Park. A site plan
was drafted in early 2020
with construction starting
in fall 2020. The facility
will be located on the
southern portion of the
park and provide a future
park access off of County
Road 8.
Neighborhood meetings
were held to discuss the
plans during which there
was interest in master
planning Irish Avenue
Park. The Parks Com-
mission continues to
receive updates on the
project.
Site Layout Options for Lions Park
Lions Park Moving Forward
The City Council and Parks Commission reviewed a Feasibility Study for Lions
Park at a workshop on June 29. The study included minor changes to the master
plan to ensure that the park aligns with the Hugo Gardens development and antic-
ipated road improvement projects. Updated cost estimates of construction were
presented and the Council and Commission discussed funding options. The
Feasibility Study was adopted by the Council at their July 20 meeting.
A remote community workshop was held on October 7, with a few participants
joining the zoom meeting and in-person at City Hall. An online survey tool was
used during the meeting and was made available online in the weeks following.
Design development of the park kicked off in the fall with the formation of stake-
holder committees made up of volunteers from Hugo Commissions and residents.
WSB and HCM Architects were selected to help with the design. One committee
was formed to design the large playground and youth play areas. A second com-
mittee was charged with designing the large multi-purpose pavilion which is
intended to accommodate large community events, multiple small gatherings at a
time, performances, and more. Committee meetings were held on October 29
and November 24. All meetings are being held remotely via zoom. An additional
meeting will be held in January 2021. Following approval of a schematic design,
construction documents will be drafted and bids are anticipated to be awarded in
the spring of 2021. Construction is likely to start in early summer 2021.
Lions Park Pavilion Design Concepts
City of Hugo Claims
March 1, 2021 G. 1
Vendor Invoice Amount Description Department
ACME Tools 8391036 985.00$ Tools - Unit #107-20 Water & Sewer
American Public Works Assoc 671710 268.75$ APWA Member Fees - Scott Anderson Public Works
Aspen Equipment Company 10225168 87.55$ Parts - Unit #202 Street Dept
Aspen Mills 268929 138.40$ Class A Uniform Modifications Fire Dept
AutoNation Inc 19588 93.55$ Parts - Unit #115 Street Dept
Baller, Scott CLAIM 25.00$ MN DOLI Seminar Registration Building Inspections
BlueTarp Financial Inc 363189229 86.70$ Equipment - Unit #107-20 Water & Sewer
BlueTarp Financial Inc 363189231 227.31$ Tools & Equipment - Unit #107-20 Water & Sewer
BlueTarp Financial Inc 363189935 40.98$ Hardware - Unit #339 Parks Dept
Canteen Refreshment Services MSP22352 148.90$ Breakroom Supplies Gen Gov't Bldgs
Canteen Refreshment Services MSP22353 37.19$ Breakroom Supplies Public Works
Capital City Regional Firefighters Assoc 102 50.00$ 2021 Membership Dues Fire Dept
Cargill Incorporated 2905967605 6,682.05$ Salt for Snow & Ice Control Street Dept
Cargill Incorporated 2905970715 11,246.78$ Salt for Snow & Ice Control Street Dept
Century Link 651 426-8763 68.68$ 911 Emergency Line Administration
Century Link 651 429-3212 71.33$ Fire Station Phone Lines Fire Dept
Century Link 651 653-1154 62.68$ SCADA Lines Water & Sewer
Cintas Corporation 5049430574 86.71$ First Aid Supplies Gen Gov't Bldgs
Cintas Corporation 5049430574 131.73$ First Aid Supplies Public Works
City of Roseville 229867 7,172.51$ February Computer Service Various
Comcast 1/18/2021 161.67$ Business Internet (thru February 27) Fire Dept
Comcast 2/12/2021 10.48$ Business Cable (thru March 21) Administration
Comcast 116605330 496.66$ Business Internet (February) Administration
Comcast 116605330 496.66$ Business Internet (February) Public Works
Custom Fire Apparatus Inc 0019982-IN 42.62$ Air Eject Couplers Fire Dept
De Lage Landen Financial Services Inc 71303947 311.37$ February Copier Lease Payment Administration
Diamond Mowers Inc 0192773-IN 1,821.32$ Parts - Unit #317-A Street Dept
Dresser Trap Rock Inc 120164 2,306.50$ 3/8" Chips for Snow & Ice Control Street Dept
Earl F. Andersen 0125661-IN 179.30$ Street Sign Plates Street Dept
Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Inc 115612 2,144.24$ Repairs - Unit #R1 Fire Dept
Emergency Apparatus Maintenance Inc 115986 2,673.93$ Repairs - Unit #R1 Fire Dept
Emergency Automotive Technologies Inc SVC28678 90.00$ Repairs - Unit #B2 Fire Dept
Ferguson Waterworks 469283 853.62$ Equipment - Unit #107-20 Water & Sewer
Ferguson Waterworks 469283 39.39$ Safety Supplies Water & Sewer
Forest Lake Napa January 904.87$ Auto Parts and Shop Supplies Various
Frattallone's Hardware Store 142146 68.98$ Carpet Cleaner Rental & Supplies Various
Frattallone's Hardware Store 142215 34.99$ Carpet Cleaner Rental Various
Frattallone's Hardware Store 142296 44.99$ Carpet Cleaner Rental Various
Frattallone's Hardware Store 142330 23.99$ Carpet Cleaner Supplies Various
Gene's Disposal Service Inc 405916 448.35$ January Waste Hauling - PW Facility Public Works
Gene's Disposal Service Inc 405916 195.38$ January Waste Hauling - Fire Station Fire Dept
Gene's Disposal Service Inc 405916 91.91$ January Waste Hauling - City Hall Gen Gov't Bldgs
Gopher State One Call 1010481 141.75$ January Service Charges Water & Sewer
Government Finance Officers Assoc 2996997 490.00$ Governmental Accounting Intensive Series Training Finance Dept
Grainger 9794363714 133.68$ Part Bins Public Works
Hanco Corporation 558357 563.33$ Shop Supplies Public Works
HCM Architects 2066-4 6,458.75$ Lions Park Architect Services Special Parks Fund
Hoistad, Joel CLAIM 265.00$ Work Boot Reimbursement Building Inspections
Hugo Feed Mill 1100710 5.49$ Carpet Cleaner Supplies Various
Hugo Mill Outdoor Power Equipment 164015 59.97$ Chainsaw Supplies (Tree Trimming) Street Dept
Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN3235192 113.82$ Copy Paper Public Works
Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN3235192 44.99$ Trash Can Liners Public Works
Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN3235192 33.99$ Markers Public Works
Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN3248215 132.99$ Storage Boxes Finance Dept
Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN3248215 22.77$ Binder Administration
Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN3256913 43.46$ Pens & Ruler Administration
Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN3256913 42.99$ Breakroom Supplies Gen Gov't Bldgs
Instrumental Research Inc 3152 100.00$ Water Bacteria Testing Water Utility
John Deere Financial P18378 324.50$ Parts - Unit #317 Street Dept
Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP 22110151 1,160.12$ Alarm Testing & Inspection Gen Gov't Bldgs
Johnson/Turner January 4,829.00$ Prosecution Fees (Flat Fee) General Legal
Johnson/Turner January 294.95$ Disbursements (Prosecution Costs) General Legal
Johnson/Turner January 4,630.50$ Civil Legal Fees - See Attached Breakdown General Legal
Kath Fuel Oil Service Co. 12320094 4,775.67$ January Unleaded Gas & Diesel Purchases Various
Kieffer, Rick CLAIM 74.98$ Fender - Unit #339 (Amazon) Parks Dept
Laughlin's Pest Control 41749 85.00$ January Pest Control Service (CH) Gen Gov't Bldgs
Lawson Products 9308165127 332.26$ Bulk Hardware Supplies Public Works
Lawson Products 9308172440 318.78$ Shop Tools Public Works
Lawson Products 9308194205 1,235.47$ Bulk Hardware Supplies Public Works
Page 1
City of Hugo Claims
March 1, 2021 G. 1
Vendor Invoice Amount Description Department
Lawson Products 9308203294 341.28$ Bulk Hardware Supplies Public Works
Lawson Products 9308203295 95.40$ Bulk Hardware Supplies Public Works
Lawson Products 9308215540 21.85$ Welding Supplies Public Works
Lawson Products 9308215541 162.03$ Welding Supplies Public Works
Lindau, Michele CLAIM 20.00$ Notary Filing Fee (Chisago County) City Clerk
Loffler Companies Inc 3636330 253.80$ February Copier Service Payment Administration
Lowe's 71512 1,069.02$ Tools & Equipment - Unit #107-20 Water & Sewer
MacQueen Equipment Inc P32161 144.59$ Waypoint Streamlight Spotlight - Unit #107-20 Water & Sewer
Marco INV8404072 39.50$ February Copier Maintenance Building Inspections
Menards 55038 299.96$ Wall Sconces - CH LED Lighting Upgrade Gen Gov't Bldgs
Menards 55292 52.96$ Supplies Parks Dept
Menards 55933 334.58$ Tools & Equipment - Unit #107-20 Water & Sewer
Menards 55943 65.94$ Trash Bags Parks Dept
Menards 55943 5.98$ Gap Filler Parks Dept
Menards 56584 5.98$ Equipment - Unit #107-20 Water & Sewer
Menards 56791 149.99$ Vacuum for Rice Lake Center Gen Gov't Bldgs
Menards 57070 201.08$ Supplies - FH LED Lighting Upgrade Fire Dept
Menards 57071 82.84$ Hardware - Unit #339 Parks Dept
Menards 57127 665.74$ Tools & Equipment - Unit #107-20 Water & Sewer
Menards 57127 184.08$ Ceiling Tiles (PW) Public Works
Menards 57233 2.10$ Supplies - FH LED Lighting Upgrade Fire Dept
Menards 57302 26.73$ Supplies - FH LED Lighting Upgrade Fire Dept
Menards 57514 30.96$ Tools & Equipment - Unit #107-20 Water & Sewer
Menards 57579 38.93$ Supplies Street Dept
Menards 57581 43.96$ Tools - Unit #107-20 Water & Sewer
Menards 57581 12.99$ Shop Supplies Public Works
Menards 57605 2.29$ Hardware Fire Dept
Menards 57301 (10.98)$ Supplies - FH LED Lighting Upgrade (Returned) Fire Dept
Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0221HH01 605.00$ January Cleaning Service Gen Gov't Bldgs
Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0221HH03 500.00$ January Cleaning Service Public Works
Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0221HH03 450.00$ January Cleaning Service Fire Dept
Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0221HH02 100.00$ January Cleaning Service - Hanifl Parks Dept
Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0321HH01 605.00$ February Cleaning Service Gen Gov't Bldgs
Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0321HH03 500.00$ February Cleaning Service Public Works
Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0321HH03 450.00$ February Cleaning Service Fire Dept
Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0321HH02 100.00$ February Cleaning Service - Hanifl Parks Dept
Minnesota Rural Water Association 2021 325.00$ 2021 Membership Dues Water & Sewer
MN Dept of Transportation P00011744 122.62$ Bituminous Inspections - 130th Street Imp Project Street Reconstruction
MN Dept of Transportation P00012613 289.70$ Bituminous Inspections - Goodview Ave Imp Project Street Reconstruction
Municipal Emergency Services Inc IN1540457 4,271.80$ Rescue Coats & Pants Fire Dept
NAC Mechanical Corp 181112 511.92$ HVAC Repairs - CH Gen Gov't Bldgs
NAC Mechanical Corp 181114 4,993.00$ HVAC Repairs - PW Public Works
Nelson, Neal CLAIM 182.74$ Work Boot Reimbursement Street Dept
Nuss Truck & Equipment 4658938P 54.30$ Parts - Units #204 Street Dept
OPG-3 Inc 4737 495.00$ Laserfiche Project - Online Training Resources Administration
Oxygen Service Company 3486165 27.28$ Welding Supplies Public Works
Oxygen Service Company 8410679 1,070.35$ Welding Equipment - Unit #107-20 Water & Sewer
Oxygen Service Company 8411016 610.75$ Welding Supplies Public Works
Oxygen Service Company 8411775 59.56$ Welding Equipment - Unit #107-20 Water & Sewer
Oxygen Service Company 8411776 59.56$ Welding Equipment - Unit #107-20 Water & Sewer
PermitWorks LLC 2021-0022 1,800.00$ PermitWorks Remote Inspector Yearly Access Building Inspections
PermitWorks LLC 2021-0022 1,495.00$ PermitWorks Software Support Building Inspections
PermitWorks LLC 2021-0022 1,495.00$ Code Enforcement Software Support Building Inspections
PermitWorks LLC 2021-0022 595.00$ PermitWorks Scheduler Software Support Building Inspections
Press Publications 691568 72.60$ Planning Commission Public Hearing Notice Ordinances/Proceedings
Press Publications 691569 254.10$ 2021 Summary Budget Statement Ordinances/Proceedings
Press Publications 692813 36.30$ City Council Meeting Cancelled Notice Ordinances/Proceedings
Quadient Leasing USA Inc N8680896 68.99$ Meter Rental - December Administration
Quadient Leasing USA Inc N8680896 68.99$ Meter Rental - January Administration
Quadient Leasing USA Inc N8680896 68.99$ Meter Rental - February Administration
Ricoh USA, Inc 104610539 123.18$ Copier Lease Payment Public Works
Ricoh USA, Inc 104610539 67.88$ Overage Charges Public Works
Sensible Land Use Coalition 707 15.00$ Meeting Registration - Rachel Juba Planning & Zoning
Snap-On Industrial ARV / 46798143 566.69$ Shop Tools Public Works
Snap-On Industrial ARV / 46824766 116.84$ Shop Tools Public Works
Snap-On Industrial ARV / 46838991 110.88$ Shop Tools Public Works
Snap-On Industrial ARV / 46999434 66.00$ Welding Gloves Public Works
Snap-On Industrial ARV / 47051102 116.84$ Shop Tools Public Works
Sun Life Financial February 1,123.50$ Disability Premium Finance Dept
Page 2
City of Hugo Claims
March 1, 2021 G. 1
Vendor Invoice Amount Description Department
Toshiba Financial Services 5013483546 175.23$ February Copier Lease Payment Fire Dept
Toshiba Financial Services 5013483546 1.14$ Overage Charges (B & W) Fire Dept
Toshiba Financial Services 5013483546 19.74$ Overage Charges (Color) Fire Dept
Total Control Systems Inc 9649 818.66$ Parts - Well No. 4 Water Utility
Total Control Systems Inc 9649 428.50$ Tech Labor - Lift Station No. 1 Sewer Utility
Tri-State Bobcat A83841 100.56$ Parts - Unit #304-A Street Dept
Tri-State Bobcat E30201 2,500.00$ Chipper Rental (Tree Trimming) Street Dept
Twin City Acoustics Inc 139092 67.20$ Ceiling Tiles (CH) Gen Gov't Bldgs
UniFirst Corporation 090 0603998 135.30$ Uniform, Supplies & Floor Mat Services (PW) Public Works
UniFirst Corporation 090 0605309 46.04$ Supplies & Floor Mat Services (CH) Gen Gov't Bldgs
UniFirst Corporation 090 0605310 61.48$ Supplies & Floor Mat Services (FH) Fire Dept
UniFirst Corporation 090 0605311 199.22$ Uniform, Supplies & Floor Mat Services (PW) Public Works
UniFirst Corporation 090 0606625 135.30$ Uniform, Supplies & Floor Mat Services (PW) Public Works
UniFirst Corporation 090 0607942 135.30$ Uniform, Supplies & Floor Mat Services (PW) Public Works
US Bank 5920072 350.00$ Acceptance Fees Sinking Fund
US Bank 5920072 500.00$ Paying Agent Fees Sinking Fund
Verizon Wireless 9872679301 1,135.18$ Cellular Phone Charges Various
Viking Electric Supply Inc S004319049.001 299.99$ Fluke Multimeter Water & Sewer
Viking Electric Supply Inc S004359392.001 117.96$ Fuses - Lift Station No. 1 Sewer Utility
Viking Electric Supply Inc S004407994.001 152.81$ Fixtures & Bulbs - CH LED Lighting Upgrade Gen Gov't Bldgs
Visu-Sewer, Inc 32249 4,330.83$ Televise Sanitary Sewer - Downtown Street Imp Project Street Reconstruction
Washington County 29145 116.85$ Hazardous Waste Generator License Public Works
Washington County 71462 26.25$ Tax Exempt Registration - Unit #341-20 Street Dept
Washington County 185367 1,606.68$ 2021 Truth In Taxation Notice Miscellaneous
Washington County 185411 120.00$ Year End Tax Stats Finance Dept
Winnick Supply 423536 94.14$ Angle Steel - Unit #343-20 Parks Dept
Winnick Supply 423779 104.46$ Steel Public Works
Winnick Supply 424034 1,201.79$ Steel Public Works
Winnick Supply 424034 109.26$ Welding Supplies Public Works
WSB & Associates December 141,556.80$ Engineering Fees - See Attached Breakdown Various
Xcel Energy 51-0013009096-8 273.69$ Water Tower No. 4 Electric Water Utility
Zack's Inc 34756 1,241.42$ Shop Towels, Ratchet Straps, Gloves, Etc Public Works
Ziegler Inc PC200251709 564.20$ Parts - Unit #306 Street Dept
255,582.15$ Total Claims for March 1, 2021
Page 3
Agenda Number: G.4
CITY OF HUGO
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator
FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Marvin and Judith LaValle and Hugo Investments, LLC (Larry
Barnabo). Property line adjustment for properties located at the northwest
and southwest corners of Frenchman Road (CSAH 8) and Forest
Boulevard (TH 61)
DATE: February 24, 2021, for the City Council Meeting of March 1, 2021
REVIEW DEADLINE: March 13, 2021
ZONING: Central Business (C-1)
LAND USE: Mixed-Use (MIX)
1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The applicants are requesting approval of a property line adjustment for the properties located at
the northwest and southwest corners of Frenchman Road (CSAH 8) and Forest Boulevard (TH
61). The applicant is proposing to adjust the common property line between the properties and
combine then into two parcels. This adjustment will result in Parcel A totaling 4.97 acres and
Parcel B totaling 16.09 acres.
2. ANALYSIS:
Section 90-339 of the City’s Comprehensive Land Use Regulations states that, “where adjacent
property owners desire to adjust their mutual lot line without creating a new parcel or lot of record,
they may request a property line adjustment.” Subd. (2) of this section further states that, “where
the adjustment of the property line between two properties retains or causes both properties to be
Page 2
in conformance with the City’s Comprehensive Land Use Regulation, the Zoning Administrator
shall provide the application to the City Council for administrative review and consideration.”
Findings
Staff finds that both properties are in compliance with all applicable regulations in the City Code
and will continue to comply after the property line adjustment.
4. RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of the attached resolution approving a property line adjustment for
Marvin and Judith LaValle and Hugo Investments, LLC (Larry Barnabo).
Attachments:
1. Site Map
2. Survey
3. Approving Resolution
Forest Boulevard NorthFre
n
c
h
m
a
n
R
o
a
d
140th Street North
145th Street North
Flay Avenue NorthFinale Avenue North141st Street North
Egg Lake Road North
146th Street North
Fenway Avenue NorthFenway Boulevard NorthF
o
u
ntain A
v
e
n
u
e
N
orthFerrara Avenue North142nd Street North
138th Street North Fondant Avenue NorthFoxhill Avenue NorthUpper 146Th Street North
141st Ci
rcl
e NorthFrenchman Road
Flay Avenue NorthFinale Avenue North142nd Street North
LaValle Property Line Adjustm ent
Location MapHugo, MN
Roads
Hugo Border
Parcel Boundary
¯0 500Feet1 in = 500 feet Document Path: S:\Mapping\Emily\LocationSite Maps\2021\Lavalle PLA.mxdSite
RESOLUTION 2021-____
APPROVING A PROPERTY LINE ADJUSTMENT FOR MARVIN AND JUDITH
LAVALLE AND HUGO INVESTMENTS. LLC (LARRY BARNABO) FOR THE
PROPERTIES LOCATED AT THE NORTHWEST AND SOUTHWEST
CORNERS OF FRENCHMAN ROAD (CSAH 8) AND FOREST BOULEVARD
(TH 61).
WHEREAS, an application has been filed by Marvin and Judith LaValle and Hugo
Investments. LLC (Larry Barnabo) that requests approval of a property line adjustment for
properties located at the northwest and southwest corners of Frenchman Road (CSAH 8)
and Forest Boulevard (TH 61).
WHEREAS, the proposed lot line adjustment would result in two parcels described as
follows:
(See Attached)
WHEREAS, the City Council has fully considered the request for the property line
adjustment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the property line
adjustment for Marvin and Judith LaValle and Hugo Investments. LLC (Larry Barnabo).
ADOPTED by the City Council this 1st day of March, 2021
________________________________________
Tom Weidt, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Michele Lindau, City Clerk
Agenda Number: G.6
CITY OF HUGO
PLANNING AND ZONING
APPLICATION STAFF REPORT
TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator
FROM: Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant
SUBJECT: Golden Valley Land Company – Requesting approval for a preliminary plat,
planned unit development, and comprehensive plan amendment for a residential
development to be known as “The Meadows at Hugo.”
DATE: February 22, 2021 for the City Council meeting of March 1, 2021.
ZONING: Future Urban Service (FUS)
LAND USE: Medium Density Residential (MD)
60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: March 2, 2021.
1. PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE:
At its February 11, 2021 meeting, the Hugo Planning Commission held a public hearing and
considered the request. There were two residents who spoke during the public hearing as well as
a few who provided comments in writing prior to the meeting. All written comments were made
available to the Planning Commission and applicant prior to the meeting. Comments from the
public generally consisted of the following:
• Increased traffic concerns, specifically with the only access to the proposed development
having to go through the Farnham Avenue N and 159th Street N.
• Eliminating four lots on the southwest corner to add more open space.
• Concerns with the reduced lot sizes and setback requirements.
The Planning Commission generally liked the layout and improvements that the applicant made
from the previously submitted sketch plans. There was additional discussion on the proposed
five-foot side yard setbacks on the 50-foot wide lots. Some of the Commissioners had concerns
with the side yard setbacks but felt that the applicant has provided an appropriate product type to
accommodate the proposed side yard setbacks. Additionally, staff explained that the property is
guided Medium Density residential and that by proposing single family, villa products, the
applicant is proposing an alternative to multifamily dwelling units as permitted by City Code.
The Planning Commission found that the applications meet all requirements necessary for
approval and they unanimously approved the applications, subject to the conditions in the
resolutions.
The Meadows at Hugo – Preliminary Plat, PUD, and Comp Plan Amendment
Page 2
2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat, planned unit development (PUD), and
comprehensive plan amendment for a residential development. The PUD totals 32.93 acres and
has 5.92 acres of wetlands for a net area of 27.01 acres. The preliminary plat proposes a total of
87 single family lots and six outlots. The property is currently zoned Future Urban Service (FUS)
and is proposed to be rezoned to Planning Unit Development (PUD).
The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility on the following:
• Flexibility to allow a minimum lot size of 5,500 square feet, where 10,400 square feet is
required.
• Flexibility to allow a minimum lot width of 44 feet, were 80 feet is required by ordinance.
• Flexibility to allow a minimum front yard building setback of 25 feet, where 30 feet is
required.
• Flexibility to allow a minimum side yard setback of 5 feet, where 10 feet is required.
• Flexibility to allow a maximum percentage of impervious surface of 60%, where 50% is
required.
• Flexibility from the Shoreland Overlay District requirements through the PUD as approved
by the MN DNR.
In exchange for this flexibility, the developer is:
• Designing a more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of the
standard R-3 zoning district.
• Preserving and enhancing natural features with the trail system that meanders through the
development and connects to adjacent City park property.
• Creating a connection through the Greenway Corridor in the City with the establishment of a
passive trail.
• Providing landscaping that exceeds the City’s requirements.
• Incorporating architectural design guidelines for homes within the development to ensure
high quality and varied products.
The applicant is also requesting approval of a comprehensive plan amendment. The developer’s
proposed utility plan identifies a connection to the Met Council Interceptor approximately 1,320
feet south of 165th Street North, which is at the northwest corner of the property. The City’s
Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan identifies a sanitary sewer connection to the Met Council
Interceptor at 165th Street North. Any modification to connection locations requires a
comprehensive plan amendment.
The Meadows at Hugo – Preliminary Plat, PUD, and Comp Plan Amendment
Page 3
3. CONTEXT:
A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning
The properties to north are zoned FUS and guided as Medium Density Residential (MD) in the
2040 Land Use Plan. The property to the east is zoned Restricted Industrial (RI-1) and is guided
Industrial. To the south is the Creekview Preserve Development, which is occupied by single
family homes and zoned Single Family Detached Residential (R-3). West of the property is City
owned park property that was dedicated with the Oneka Place development. Also adjacent to the
property is the City’s north water tower site.
B. Existing Site Characteristics
The property is currently vacant and does contain some challenges regarding existing wetlands
and a ditch. The property contains 5.92 acres of wetlands and a section of Judicial Ditch 3.
4. BACKGROUND:
The property is generally located north of 159th Street North and west of Highway 61. The plan
shows 87 single family, residential lots, wetlands and stormwater ponding areas, road and trail
connections, and sidewalks and trails. The applicant is proposing the project to be built in two
phases. The developer is not proposing a Homeowners Association or stormwater reuse for the
development.
The applicant previously applied for a sketch plan application and received comments from staff,
the Planning Commission, and the City Council. At its February 27, 2020 meeting, the Planning
Commission considered the site plan and generally liked the layout of the site, trail connections,
and site access. The Planning Commission expressed concerns with the proposed 5 foot side yard
setbacks and encouraged the applicant to use 7.5 foot side yard setbacks. They also discussed
adding creativity to the site plan and layout to add character to development in exchange for the
smaller side yard setbacks. The applicant amended their sketch plan for the March 16, 2020 City
Council meeting and received more feedback. Generally the City Council agreed with the
Planning Commission and suggested using a creative approach to the layout of the site in order
to avoid monotony. Some suggestions included offering a variety of products, staggering front
yard setbacks, and keeping villa products at one-story or one and a half story.
5. ANALYSIS:
A. Level of Discretion in Decision Making
The City has discretion in approving or denying rezoning applications, based on whether or not
the proposal meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the
applicable standards are met, the rezoning application must be approved. However, if the City
finds that any of the applicable standards are not met, the application may be denied.
The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving a PUD. A PUD must be consistent
with the City’s comprehensive plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not
The Meadows at Hugo – Preliminary Plat, PUD, and Comp Plan Amendment
Page 4
otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety, and
welfare of the community.
The City’s discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the
proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations in the City Code. If it
meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat.
B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards
Rezoning/Planned Unit Development
The use of the PUD zoning allows the developer zoning ordinance flexibility to create a master
planned development. The PUD zoning is tied to a specific PUD general plan that is proposed
with this application.
Golden Valley Land Company, is requesting an approval of a PUD general plan for The
Meadows at Hugo development. PUD’s offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the
relaxation of zoning district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater
variety of uses, internal transfers of density, construction phasing and a potential for lower
development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the city has the expectation that the
development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than
would have been the case with the use of other, more standard zoning districts.
In order to approve a PUD, the City must find that the applicant has demonstrated compliance
with the following criteria:
1. Provide for the establishment of PUD zoning districts in appropriate settings and
situations, to create and maintain a development pattern that complies with the City’s
Comprehensive Plan.
2. Allow for the mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land
uses could not otherwise be accomplished.
3. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to
improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design
elements that exceed the City’s standards to offset the effect of any variations.
4. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at
the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics,
economic viability and general welfare of the City.
5. Preserve and enhance natural features and open spaces including but not limited to
the width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas,
development of buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint
facilities and utilities.
6. Maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities.
The Meadows at Hugo – Preliminary Plat, PUD, and Comp Plan Amendment
Page 5
7. Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses.
In exchange for the proposed PUD, the applicant is proposing a more sensitive development
proposal than would have been the case with the use of the standard R-3 zoning district,
preservation of natural features with the trail system that meanders through the development, and
multiple trail connections. The applicant is also incorporating architectural design guidelines for
the homes in the development and providing varied product types.
The 2040 Comprehensive Plan shows the land use being Medium Density Residential (MD). The
rezoning/PUD is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in terms of land use and density. Staff
believes that the general layout of the proposed Meadows at Hugo PUD general plan will exceed
the City’s standards for residential developments. The applicant is proposing on-site wetland
mitigation, which ultimately preserves high quality wetlands. It is in staff’s opinion that The
Meadows at Hugo PUD general plan will offer a creative and efficient method to planning the
site, meeting the intent of the PUD ordinance.
Lot Sizes/Setbacks
The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 32.93-acre site into 87 single family home sites. The
applicant is proposing a combination of product types, lot sizes, and building setbacks listed
below:
Required
(R3)
Proposed
2-Story Villa 1-Story Villa
Minimum lot size
10,400 sq.
ft. 5,400 sq. ft. 6,750 sq. ft.
Minimum lot width at front setback line 80 ft. 44 ft. 50 ft.
Minimum lot depth 100 ft. 135 ft. 135 ft.
Minimum front yard building setback 30 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft.
Minimum side yard building setback 10 ft. 7.5 ft. 5 ft.
Minimum rear yard building setback 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft.
Maximum lot area covered by impervious
surface 50% Up to 55% Up to 60%
* Requested PUD flexibility highlighted in grey
Density
The Medium Density residential designation identifies a minimum density of three units per acre
and a maximum density of eight units per acre. The applicant is proposing a residential net
density of 3.22 units per 1 acre, which aligns with the Medium Density standards in the 2040
Land Use Plan. Medium Density residential allows single-family homes, townhomes, and
multifamily dwellings as permitted types of development. The primary intent is to respond to a
need for smaller homes on smaller lots and to expand housing opportunities within the City. By
providing flexibility on lot sizes and setback requirements, the developer is able to meet the
intent of the land use designation.
The Meadows at Hugo – Preliminary Plat, PUD, and Comp Plan Amendment
Page 6
Shoreland
The property is in the Shoreland Overlay District as it falls 300 feet within Judicial Ditch (JD) 3.
The development is required to meet the DNR Shoreland Overlay District requirements for
planned unit developments. In order to meet the DNR requirements for PUDs within the
Shoreland Overlay District, the applicant is proposing 25 single family lots along JD3 and
maintaining 50% open space from the lots to the ditch. The applicant is required to show proof of
approval from the DNR.
Development Phasing
The applicant is proposing to construct the development in two phases. The phasing plan that the
applicant provided shows the phasing generally starting from the west to east. The first phase
would be constructed in 2021 and include the platting of 48 lots. The second phase will include
the remaining 39 lots with construction planned in 2023. The property is proposed to be mass
graded to accommodate wetland mitigation and stormwater management.
Landscaping/ Signage
The applicant has provided a full landscape plan. According to Section 90-181 Landscaping,
each home site shall have two deciduous shade trees maintained in the front yard. The applicant
is also proposing to have two trees per lot, however, one tree in the front yard and one tree
elsewhere on the lot. In addition to trees on each lot, the applicant is proposing trees along the
public streets.
The applicant is proposing to install approximately 228 trees throughout the development. Staff
recommends the applicant ensure that the boulevard trees are located outside of the right of way.
Staff is comfortable with the landscaping of the development.
The applicant is not proposing any signage at this time.
Lighting
The applicant is proposing typical street lighting within the development that meets the
ordinance standard. The exact locations and design of the street lights will be evaluated with
each final plat application. Staff recommends the street lights be a decorative, lantern style.
Streets/Access
The applicant is proposing access into the development from the southwest portion of the
property. This requires an extension of Farnham Avenue North through City-owned property.
During the sketch plan review process, the Planning Commission and City Council was
comfortable with allowing access through the City-owned property provided that the public
street was constructed at the developer’s expense. This will also allow access to the passive park
that was dedicated with the Oneka Place development.
The Meadows at Hugo – Preliminary Plat, PUD, and Comp Plan Amendment
Page 7
The applicant is proposing to construct the road at their expense. They are also showing an
access driveway connecting to the City’s water tower from the public road. This will allow
access to the water tower to come from the north and through City property. The applicant shall
provide a curb cut at the location indicated on the site plan. The intersection at 159th Street North
and Farnham Avenue North will remain with no stop controls at 159th Street North and a stop
condition on Farnham Avenue from the north and south. The City is requesting that the
developer removes the existing sidewalk on the east side of the Farnham Avenue North stub
street. The applicant will be required to provide a legal description and right of way document
for the public road on the City-owned property as part of the final plat application.
In addition to the access from the south, there are two road connections proposed to the north
that will provide access to the two adjacent northern properties and eventually out to 165th Street
North.
Sidewalks, Trails, and Park Dedication
The applicant is proposing an eight foot trail throughout the development as shown in the trails
plan to connect between Farnham Avenue North and eventually north to 165th Street North, with
future development. The applicant has shown a trail along both road connections to the north,
which allows more options for future connections to the north as well as provide a more
consistent and linear corridor. The applicant is also proposing a trail connection to the west that
will provide access into the City-owned park land that is adjacent to the development. The
applicant has stated that there will be an additional mowed, passive trail along the ditch on the
east side of the development. The passive trail will be consistent with making connections within
the Greenway Corridor as indicated in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. Staff is comfortable with
the trail connections and location.
Land dedication is not preferred as there is future park property to the west and Frog Hollow, an
active park, constructed to the south. The park dedication fee is currently $2,400 per unit for a
total of $208,800 for the development.
Utilities
As identified in the City’s Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan, a 24 inch trunk
watermain will need to be extended north from the water tower location. The 24 inch water main
will be extended north throughout the development with the City paying for oversizing costs.
As identified in the City’s Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan, a 36 inch trunk main is
identified as a connection to the Met Council Interceptor. The proposed plan identifies a
connection to the Interceptor at approximately 1320 feet south of 165th Street North, which
requires a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The applicant will be required to obtain approval
from the Metropolitan Council for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment prior to final plat.
The applicant is also required to get a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District to allow
ditch crossing for the utility connection to the east.
The Meadows at Hugo – Preliminary Plat, PUD, and Comp Plan Amendment
Page 8
Easements
The applicant shall obtain the appropriate easement documents for a 50-foot easement along the
north property line as well as a 50-foot easement through the adjacent property to the east. This
easement shall follow the northern property lines from the adjacent property and extend north to
165th Street North in order to accommodate for future utility extensions.
Stormwater Management/Wetlands
The applicant is meeting rate control and water quality requirements through multiple
stormwater ponds that are adjacent and hydraulically connected to the various wetlands
throughout the property. Due to the proximity of a stormwater pond to JD3, the applicant has
applied for and received Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes (CAPROC) for a
Rule I Permit with the Rice Creek Watershed District. Additionally, the applicant will be
required to address all redline drainage comments provided to the applicant from the City
Engineer as addressed in the memo dated February 5, 2021, prior to the issuance of the
stormwater permit.
The applicant is proposing to impact 1.72 acres of the 5.92 acres of wetland for street and pond
construction. All wetland mitigation will be done on site. The applicant has submitted a wetland
replacement plan to the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) for approval of the wetland impacts.
The wetland replacement plan will need to be approved prior to final plat approval of any phase.
The City requested that the developer use a water reuse system for lawn irrigation in order to
further meet PUD requirements and the City’s overall water conservation goals. However, due to
site constraints, the applicant has provided calculations to demonstrate why this is not reasonably
feasible. The minimal grade change across the site and the presence of wetlands throughout the
site limit the amount of water that can be drawn from stormwater ponds. In other residential
developments that utilize a water reuse system, ponds can be drawn down 3 or 4 feet prior to any
negative wetland impacts. However, due to the hydraulic connection between the ponds and
wetlands on this site, a 6 inch difference in water level could negatively impact the wetlands and
is not permitted under WCA regulations. Staff has recommended the developer consider
alternative water conservation practices for the development.
Housing Types/Covenants
Golden Valley Land Co. is partnering with Centra Homes as the builder for this project. The
applicant is proposing two housing types, both of which will be slab on grade. The 50-foot lots
will have single-story, 40-foot wide single family homes and the 44-foot lots will have two-story,
29-foot wide single family homes. All homes will have an attached two car garage. The applicant
has stated that the front of the garages will remain flush with the front of the home in order to
avoid a “garage forward” design. The developer is not proposing a homeowners association but
has provided draft covenants for the development. The covenants include accessory building
restrictions, architectural guidelines, and implementing the usage of smart water saving
technology within the homes. Final approval of the covenants is required prior to final plat
approval and staff will continue to work with the applicant on this. Examples of the product type
and layout are included in the attachments.
The Meadows at Hugo – Preliminary Plat, PUD, and Comp Plan Amendment
Page 9
Comprehensive Plan Amendment
The City’s Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan identifies the way in which properties are to be
served by sanitary sewer. A sanitary sewer connection to the Met Council Interceptor is
identified at 165th Street North with a 33 inch trunk main. The proposed utility plan identifies a
connection to the Interceptor approximately 1,320 feet south of 165th Street North. The City will
be responsible for paying for oversizing costs of the trunk main.
While the proposed sewer connection is different than what is shown on the Comprehensive
Plan, it does propose an alternative way to serve the development and other properties due to the
difficulties of the sanitary sewer planned to be available from the north and water main being
available from the south. Staff is comfortable with the proposed connection, as all surrounding
properties will be adequately served with sanitary sewer at the time of future development. The
applicant shall obtain drainage and utility easements from the property to the east out to 165th
Street North to allow the sanitary sewer to be extended in the future. The applicant has provided
draft easement documents from the adjacent property owner to the north to accommodate the
sewer and water utility locations.
Preliminary Plat
The preliminary plat consists of 87 residential lots and 6 outlots. The proposed use and
ownership of each outlot are as follows:
Outlot F is to remain under current ownership and will continue to be zoned Future Urban
Service. The outlot shall be combined with the parcel to the east and will be rezoned with future
development. There will be no access to Outlot F from the west and shall only be allowed from
the east.
6. CONCLUSION:
Staff believes that the layout of the proposed The Meadows at Hugo PUD general plan exceeds
the City’s standards for residential developments. Golden Valley Land Company has offered a
more creative and efficient approach to the existing constraints of the property through the site
design layout. It is in staff’s opinion that the applicant meets all the requirements necessary to
approve the PUD, preliminary plat, and comprehensive plan amendment, subject to the
conditions listed in the resolutions.
Outlot Acres Ownership Use
A 1.89 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management
B 5.16 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management
C 2.61 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management
D 0.97 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management
E 0.68 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management
F 7.16 Thommes and Thomas
Land Clearing
Remain Zoned as Future Urban Service
The Meadows at Hugo – Preliminary Plat, PUD, and Comp Plan Amendment
Page 10
7. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION:
The Hugo Planning Commission recommends approval of the PUD, preliminary plat, and
comprehensive plan amendment for Golden Valley Land Company for the development to be
known as “The Meadows at Hugo,” subject to the conditions listed in the resolutions.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Public Comments
2. Location map
3. Ordinance approving the rezoning to PUD
4. Resolution approving the PUD General Plan
5. Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat
6. Resolution approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment
7. Engineer’s Memo dated February 5, 2021
8. DNR Approval Letter dated February 2, 2021
9. RCWD Condition of Approval dated February 2, 2021
10. Applicant Narrative
11. Preliminary Plat dated February 4, 2021
12. Site Plan Submittal dated January 26, 2021, received January 28, 2021
From:JESSE KOOK
To:Emily Weber; Tom Weidt; Chuck Haas
Subject:The Meadows
Date:Thursday, February 11, 2021 5:41:08 AM
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Hi Emily,I just wanted to submit feedback for the planning commission meeting todayregarding The Meadows at Hugo. I was reviewing the packet for the development andI have a few concerns.Although I understand and am in favor of a growing Hugo, what I am concerned withis the traffic planning that seems to continue to burden existing residential streets andadd to an already increasing and dangerous ttraffic flow. West of HWY 61, HeritageParkway and 159th street continue to take the brunt of the traffic increase throughdevelopment. This continues to place a burden on the residents on those streets,decreases safety for pedestrians and children, and potentially impacts the propertyvalues of those homes. Developers should not be allowed to come in add 100 homesand dump the residual traffic onto already burdened residential streets.When a new development is approved in these areas, it needs to be approved withdirect inlets and outlets to either HWY 61 or Elmcrest and not be diverted to anexisting residential street. The developer should be required to connect a road fromthe new development to one of those two streets. In the case of The Meadows, I seeno reason why a road can not exit the North East corner of the development directlyonto HWY 61.For The Meadows and any future proposed development, the following should bedone:
1. A traffic study to evaluate the current traffic load and impact of futuredevelopment against the design and intent of 159th St N.2. Determine a more comprehensive road plan for the surrounding undevelopedland before approving this proposal with the current number of units requested.3. Deny the city ordinance flexibility as requested in the PUD (setback, lot size, lotwidth, and lot coverage).
Again, my main concern, is increasing the burden and safety risks on existinghomeowners and their residential streets with new development traffic. Cityleadership is well aware of the safety issues we've had on residential streets(specifically the two mentioned above) and to further stress those streets withincreased traffic will only continue to compound those problems.Thank you for your time,Jesse Kook
From:Jake
To:Emily Weber
Subject:Re: The Meadows at Hugo
Date:Wednesday, February 10, 2021 1:18:12 PM
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Emily
After reviewing the proposed site plan, it looks like there is good distance between the existing houses on 159th and
the new homes to the north except for the very SW corner where there are 4 homes planned as you enter the
development. I would prefer this be kept green space or park/pavilion/gazebo/monument signage/etc They just seem
very close and would be an undesirable location for the new future owners.
Thanks for the opportunity to comment on this!
Jake Vogt
> On Feb 10, 2021, at 11:27 AM, Emily Weber <EWeber@ci.hugo.mn.us> wrote:
>
> Hi Jake,
>
> Looks like I just missed a call from you. I'm at my desk if you'd like to give me a call and we can go through any
questions you may have.
>
> Yes, you can email me comments and I can pass them on to the Planning Commissioners and applicant.
>
> Thanks for reaching out!
>
> EMILY WEBER
> COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT
> CITY OF HUGO - MINNESOTA
> 14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N., Hugo, MN 55038
> o: 651.762.6311 | www.ci.hugo.mn.us
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jake [mailto:jacob.vogt@yahoo.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 11:18 AM
> To: Emily Weber <EWeber@ci.hugo.mn.us>
> Subject: The Meadows at Hugo
>
> Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
>
>
>
> Hi Emily!
>
> Hope you’re staying warm, I have some comments related to the proposed Meadows at Hugo development but not
sure if I can attend tomorrow nights meeting yet. Can I just email them to you?
>
> Thanks
From:Ryan Allshouse
To:Emily Weber
Subject:RE: Hugo Planning Commission Meeting
Date:Thursday, February 11, 2021 1:37:05 PM
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Hi Emily – I’ll try my best to logon if I can but below are my comments. I also spoke with Shayla
and I’ll be attending the parks commission meeting next week. Can you tell me what will happen
with my comments below? Will they be read aloud to the committee or provided as handouts? If I
had the option I’d prefer someone read them during the meeting.
Thanks!
Ryan Allshouse
Dear Planning Commission Members and Golden Valley Land Company representative(s),
Thank you for your service on the commission and for the opportunities to discuss the plans
submitted for the development named The Meadows at Hugo. What a great opportunity to further
develop our great city.
I'm sure I share the sentiment with many of my neighbors on the north side of 159th St N that we
have greatly enjoyed the rural feel of the back side of our property. That said, we all knew
development of this land is inevitable and a benefit to the city. I encourage my neighbors to consider
ideas to make it even better and a great place to live.
In order to preserve the many benefits, safety and peaceful enjoyment of our current neighborhood I
respectfully ask the planning commission to consider the following ideas and continue to entertain
further discussion on the proposal from Golden Valley Land Company:
The proposed lots on the south side of the new proposed road, adjacent the existing neighborhood
and my property, would be an ideal place for park space and create a natural transitions as outlined
in the 2040 plan between density and home types. Currently there are four homes proposed for this
space, which will be along a busier part of the neighborhood and less desirable for the future owners.
Instead of taking the park dedication entirely as a fee, I would love to see the city use this area as
park land and combine it with the space around the water tower to make one contiguous open space.
This space containing the four lots appear to be about half an acre and combined with the open space
around the water tower would be about one acre total of usable/buildable park space. This is a
significant space for residents to utilize within the surrounding neighborhood. It is close enough for
existing neighbors and well placed for the new neighborhood. It would be easily developed into
sport courts and field space which could serve young adult and adult activities. For example batting
cages, basketball court and pickleball courts. It is more than enough space to throw around a ball,
which Frog Hollow Park doesn’t currently provide. Convenient open space, athletic fields, and park
space is lacking within the existing neighborhood on the east side of Oneka Elementary as most
dedicated park land is currently un-usable. The overall impact to the park dedication fee would be
about eighteen percent, if the fee is in direct correlation to the required 2.7 acres of dedicated land
required for this planned development.
Increased traffic along 159th St N is a significant concern. The full traffic impact of the new
development at Oneka Place has not been reached yet, and will worsen traffic on 159th St N over
time. Additionally the intersection of 159th St N and highway 61 has developed into a very
dangerous intersection. The Meadows will add to this burden on 159th St N. Currently, the morning
and afternoon traffic levels make it difficult to pull out of my driveway onto 159th St N. One input
to the current traffic level during this time is parent drop-off/pick-up traffic at Oneka Elementary and
the bus flow to the bus parking at the rear of the school. Additionally on-street parking on 159th St N
currently creates obstruction to the flow of the street as a main artery. Buses, delivery vehicles and
other traffic frequently only allow space for one vehicle to pass at a time. Neighbors in The
Meadows having access to their home through one congested inlet could cause decreased interest
and make this neighborhood less desirable while also negatively impacting current Hugo residents.
To responsibly assess these concerns, I request that a we conduct a comprehensive study of the
current traffic levels against the classification and design of 159th St N. It would be beneficial for
the existing neighbors and new neighbors in The Meadows to see that this study is done, including
the impact of future developments not yet initiated.
As future sites are developed north and west of 61, higher levels of traffic flow will be necessary,
beneficial and desirable for these properties. Understandably road access and planning is
challenging. We should make a strategic change in road planning going forward by creating a
comprehensive plan to accommodate the zoning guidance in the area now, not as individual
properties are developed. This will allow the city to make proper amount of right of way for
connector and arterial streets where they will be needed in the future. My fear is that by continuing
to look at only 1 development at a time, Hugo will be locking in inadequate infrastructure that
cannot be corrected easily and will harm residents for decades into the future.
I apologize that I am not able to attend this public hearing in person. I look forward to the
opportunity to continue to discuss how to make this development even better to increase the desire to
attract more people to move to Hugo.
Respectfully,
Ryan Allshouse
5310 159th St N
From: Emily Weber
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 3:11 PM
To: 'Ryan Allshouse'
Subject: Hugo Planning Commission Meeting
Hi Ryan,
Here is the link to this week’s packet: February 11, 2020 PC Packet. You can find the Zoom meeting
link on the first page. Let me know if you have any questions and please feel free to pass on to
whomever else you think would like to attend. The information is also all on our website.
Thanks!
EMILY WEBER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT
CITY OF HUGO - MINNESOTA
14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N., Hugo, MN 55038
o: 651.762.6311 | www.ci.hugo.mn.us
From:Emily Weber
To:"Tom Terri Kartes"
Subject:RE: Public meeting 2-11-2021
Date:Tuesday, February 9, 2021 8:44:17 AM
Sounds good, I will look for you on the meeting. Let me know if you have any trouble connecting.
EMILY WEBER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT
CITY OF HUGO - MINNESOTA
14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N., Hugo, MN 55038
o: 651.762.6311 | www.ci.hugo.mn.us
From: Tom Terri Kartes [mailto:t4kartes@hotmail.com]
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 8:57 PM
To: Emily Weber <EWeber@ci.hugo.mn.us>
Subject: Re: Public meeting 2-11-2021
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Emily, you most certainly delivered the "whole ball of wax" in the packet. All our questions
have been answered in the narratives and by studying the drawings. We do have concerns
regarding traffic flow, quantity, and construction use. 159th Street has been taking a beating
due to construction North of the elementary school. So, it seems it will continue for quite
some time. We would like to comment on these concerns during the meeting and plan to
attend via Zoom.
Tom & Terri Kartes
From: Emily Weber <EWeber@ci.hugo.mn.us>
Sent: Monday, February 8, 2021 3:13 PM
To: 'Tom Terri Kartes' <t4kartes@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: Public meeting 2-11-2021
Hi,
Here is the link to this week’s packet: February 11, 2020 PC Packet. You can find the Zoom meeting
link on the first page, however, City Hall will also be open for the public hearing. Otherwise, you can
submit comments to me in writing and I can pass along to the applicant and Planning Commissioners
Let me know if you have any questions and please feel free to pass on to whomever else you think
would like to attend. The information is also all on our website.
EMILY WEBER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT
CITY OF HUGO - MINNESOTA
14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N., Hugo, MN 55038
o: 651.762.6311 | www.ci.hugo.mn.us
From: Tom Terri Kartes [mailto:t4kartes@hotmail.com]
Sent: Friday, February 5, 2021 7:17 PM
To: Emily Weber <EWeber@ci.hugo.mn.us>
Subject: Public meeting 2-11-2021
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
165th S treet Nort h
159th Street North
157th Street North
Forest Boulevard NorthF
a
r
n
h
a
m
A
v
e
n
u
e
No
rt
h
Foxhill Avenue NorthFalcon Circle NorthFenway Avenue NorthFinley Avenue North1 5 8 t h S t r e e t N o r t h
157th Way NorthFenson Court NorthFenway Circle NorthFinley Bay North159th Court NorthFenway Avenue North157th Way NorthThe Me adows at Hugo
Location MapHugo, MN
Roads
Hugo Border
Parcel Boundary
¯0 625Feet1 in = 625 feet Document Path: S:\Mapping\Emily\LocationSite Maps\2021\The Meadows Pre Plat.mxdSite
ORDINANCE 2020-503
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO
AMENDING CHAPTER 90 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO
CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED NORTH OF 159TH STREET NORTH
AND WEST OF HIGHWAY 61
THE CITY OF HUGO ORDAINS:
Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Chapter 90 of the City Code of the
City of Hugo, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of
Hugo Zoning Map to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with respect to the 32.93-acre
property legally described as follows:
See Attached
Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon its passage.
ADOPTED by the City Council this 1st day of March, 2021.
______________________________
Tom Weidt, Mayor
ATTEST:
________________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk
RESOLUTION 2021 - XX
APPROVING PUD GENERAL PLAN FOR GOLDEN VALLEY LAND
COMPANT FOR “THE MEADOWS AT HUGO” ON PROPERTY LOCATED
NORTH OF 159TH STREET NORTH AND WEST OF HIGHWAY 61
WHEREAS, Golden Valley Land Company, has requested approval of a PUD general
plan to allow 87 single family residential lots and 5 outlots on 32.93 acres on property
legally described as follows:
(See Attached)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the PUD general plan at a duly
called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the
request by Golden Valley Land Company, subject to the following conditions:
1. A PUD general plan is approved to allow the creation of approximately 87 single
family residential lots and 5 outlots. The development shall be constructed in
accordance with the application and plans received by the City on December 4, 2020,
January 28, 2021, and February 4, 2021, except as amended by this resolution.
2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the requested rezoning of the
32.93 acres of the property and preliminary plat.
3. The PUD general plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is
consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan.
4. The developer shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer’s letter dated
February 5, 2021 and all red-lined comments provided to the applicant.
5. PUD flexibility is granted to allow:
a. Flexibility to allow a minimum lot size of 5,500 square feet, where 10,400 square
feet is required.
b. Flexibility to allow a minimum lot width of 44 feet, were 80 feet is required by
ordinance.
c. Flexibility to allow a minimum front yard building setback of 25 feet, where 30
feet is required.
d. Flexibility to allow a minimum side yard setback of 5 feet, where 10 feet is
required.
6. The developer must comply with the Shoreland Overlay District requirements
through the The Meadows at Hugo’s PUD General Plan as approved by the DNR.
Resolution 2021-XX
Page 2
7. The preliminary phasing plan is generally approved per plans dated January 25, 2021.
The phasing plan shall be revised to include all improvements, such as stormwater
management and trails. Any major revisions to the phasing plan shall require a PUD
amendment. Minor modifications shall be reviewed and approved by staff.
a. In addition to the lots and improvements shown on the submitted plans, phase
1 shall include the passive trail connection to the City-owned park land west
of the development and the sewer and water infrastructure along the entire
length of the north property line.
b. Phase 2 shall include the passive trail path along JD3 and connection to the
Greenway Corridor.
8. The building setbacks and impervious surface coverage requirements for the PUD are
as follows:
Required
(R3)
Proposed
2-Story Villa 1-Story Villa
Minimum lot size 10,400
sq. ft. 5,400 sq. ft. 6,750 sq. ft.
Minimum lot width at front setback line 80 ft. 44 ft. 50 ft.
Minimum lot depth 100 ft. 135 ft. 135 ft.
Minimum front yard building setback 30 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft.
Minimum side yard building setback 10 ft. 7.5 ft. 5 ft.
Minimum rear yard building setback 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft.
Maximum lot area covered by impervious
surface 50% Up to 55% Up to 60%
9. The developer has indicated that covenants will be established for the development to
manage architectural design and aesthetics within the development. The covenant
document shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the recording of the final
plat for the Phase 1.
10. The developer must comply with the following, prior to Final Plat and Final PUD
Plan application approval:
Landscaping and Lighting
a. All trees shall be located outside of the public right of way.
a. The exact locations and design of the street lights will be evaluated with each
final plat application. The street lights shall be a decorative, lantern style and shall
comply with the City standards for street lighting within the public right-of-way.
Resolution 2021-XX
Page 3
Streets/Access
a. The developer shall be required to extend Farnham Avenue North through City-
owned property at their expense.
i. The developer shall provide a legal description and right of way
document for the public road constructed on the City-owned
property.
b. The developer is required to provide a curb cut to allow access to the City water
tower, as indicated on the approved plan set.
Covenants
a. The developer shall establish covenants to implement architectural design
guidelines for all residential buildings. The covenants shall be reviewed
approved by City staff.
Wetlands
a. The wetland mitigation plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Technical
Evaluation Panel.
Utilities
a. The developer shall obtain approval of a permit from the Rice Creek
Watershed District to allow a ditch crossing for the utility connection to the
east.
Easements
a. The developer shall obtain the appropriate easement documents for a 50-foot
easement along the north property line as well as a 50-foot easement through
the adjacent property to the east, prior to final plat approval. This easement
shall follow the northern property lines from the adjacent property and extend
north to 165th Street North in order to accommodate for future utility
extensions.
Resolution 2021-XX
Page 4
ADOPTED by the City Council this 1st day of March, 2021.
_____________________________
Tom Weidt, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Michele Lindau, City Clerk
Resolution 2021-XX
Page 5
RESOLUTION 2021-XX
APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GOLDEN VALLEY LAND
COMPANT FOR “THE MEADOWS AT HUGO” ON PROPERTY LOCATED
NORTH OF 159TH STREET NORTH AND WEST OF HIGHWAY 61
WHEREAS, Golden Valley Land Company, has requested approval of a PUD general
plan to allow 87 single family residential lots and 5 outlots on 40.07 acres on property
legally described as follows:
(See Attached)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the preliminary plat at a duly
called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the
request by Golden Valley Land Company, for a preliminary plat, subject to the
following conditions:
1. A preliminary plat is approved to allow the creation of 87 single family home lots
and 6 outlots, in accordance with the application and plans received by the City on
December 4, 2020, January 28, 2021, and February 4, 2021, except as amended by
this resolution.
2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of a rezoning to PUD for the
32.93 acres shown on the PUD General Plan.
3. The developer must comply with Resolution 2021-XX for the PUD.
4. The developer must comply with all conditions outlined in the City Engineer’s
memos dated February 5, 2021 and all red-lined comments provided to the applicant.
5. Park Dedication is proposed to be satisfied by fee. The park dedication fee shall be
paid for each lot platted at the amount of $2,400.00.
6. The developer has indicated that covenants will be established for the development
to implement architectural design guidelines. The covenants shall be reviewed and
approved by staff prior to the recording of the final plat for the Phase 1.
7. The developer must comply with the Shoreland Overlay District requirements
through the The Meadows at Hugo’s PUD General Plan as approved by the DNR.
Resolution 2021-XX
Page 2
8. The building setbacks and impervious surface requirements for the development are
as follows:
Required
(R3)
Proposed
2-Story Villa 1-Story Villa
Minimum lot size 10,400
sq. ft. 5,400 sq. ft. 6,750 sq. ft.
Minimum lot width at front setback line 80 ft. 44 ft. 50 ft.
Minimum lot depth 100 ft. 135 ft. 135 ft.
Minimum front yard building setback 30 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft.
Minimum side yard building setback 10 ft. 7.5 ft. 5 ft.
Minimum rear yard building setback 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft.
Maximum lot area covered by impervious
surface 50% Up to 55% Up to 60%
9. Outlot Use and Ownership:
A. Outlot F is to remain under current ownership and will continue to be zoned
Future Urban Service. The outlot shall be combined with the parcel to the
east and will be rezoned with future development. There will be no access to
Outlot F from the west and shall only be allowed from the east.
10. The landscaping planned for the development shall be installed all at the same time
during each phase. The developers shall take proper precautions to protect the trees
as the homes are being built.
11. The developer must comply with the following, prior to Final Plat and Final PUD
Plan application approval:
Landscaping and Lighting
a. All trees shall be located outside of the public right of way.
b. The applicant shall add additional trees to provide screening along the south
property lines of Lots 1-4, Block 1.
c. The exact locations and design of the street lights will be evaluated with each
final plat application. The street lights shall be a decorative, lantern style and
Outlot Acres Ownership Use
A 1.89 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management
B 5.16 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management
C 2.61 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management
D 0.97 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management
E 0.68 City of Hu go Wetland and Stormwater Management
F 7.16 Thommes and Thomas
Land Clearing
Remain Zoned as Future Urban
Service
Resolution 2021-XX
Page 3
shall comply with the City standards for street lighting within the public
right-of-way.
Streets/Access
a. The developer shall be required to extend Farnham Avenue North through
City-owned property at their expense.
i. The developer shall provide a legal description and right of way
document for the public road constructed on the City-owned
property.
b. The developer is required to provide a curb cut to allow access to the City
water tower, as indicated on the approved plan set.
Covenants
a. The developer shall establish covenants to implement architectural design
guidelines for all residential buildings. The covenants shall be reviewed
approved by City staff.
Wetlands
a. The wetland mitigation plan shall be reviewed and approved by the
Technical Evaluation Panel.
Utilities
a. The developer shall obtain approval of a permit from the Rice Creek
Watershed District to allow a ditch crossing for the utility connection to the
east.
Miscellaneous
a. The developer must obtain all necessary stormwater management and WCA
permits from the City.
b. The developer shall obtain all necessary local, state, and federal permits.
11. Prior to the release of a final plat for recording, the developer must comply with the
following conditions:
a. The City’s development fees will apply to this project. The fee amounts will
be calculated and included as part of the Development Agreement. A
development agreement shall be executed and all fees shall be paid.
Resolution 2021-XX
Page 4
b. Park Dedication shall be paid for each lot platted in the amount of $2,400.00
per lot.
c. The developer shall obtain the appropriate easement documents for a 50-foot
easement along the north property line as well as a 50-foot easement through
the adjacent property to the east. This easement shall follow the northern
property lines from the adjacent property and extend north to 165th Street
North in order to accommodate for future utility extensions.
d. The developer shall submit a construction plan set that is consistent with the
preliminary plat dated February 4, 2021.
e. The developer must receive written approval from the Metropolitan Council
for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
f. The developer shall have their proposed covenants approved by staff to
include language on architectural design, accessory building requirements,
and water conservation practices.
12. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer must comply with the
following conditions.
a. The applicant shall record the final plat, development agreement and all other
documentation at Washington County and provide the City with proof of
recording.
Resolution 2021-XX
Page 5
ADOPTED by the City Council this 1st day of March, 2021.
______________________________
Tom Weidt, Mayor
ATTEST:
_______________________________
Michele Lindau, City Clerk
Resolution 2021-XX
Page 6
RESOLUTION 2021-XX
APPROVING A COMPRHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CHANGING
MAP 11-4, 2040 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM MAP
WHEREAS, the Golden Valley Land Company has proposed an alternate location for a
sanitary sewer connection to the Met Council Interceptor. The 2040 Comprehensive
Sanitary Sewer Plan identifies a connection to the Met Council Interceptor at 165th Street
North. The new connection will be located approximately 1,320 feet south of 165th Street
North.
WHEREAS, the City of Hugo Planning Commission, at a public hearing on February 11,
2021, reviewed the proposed map amendment and recommended approval of the
application to the Metropolitan Council for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve a
Comprehensive Plan Amendment changing a sanitary sewer connection on Map 11-4,
2040 Sanitary Sewer System Map.
ADOPTED by the City Council this 1st day of March, 2021.
_______________________________
Tom Weidt, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Michele Lindau, City Clerk
S:\Users\R_Juba\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\The Meadows at Hugo\Preliminary Plat and PUD\Engineer Comments\LTR-r juba-Meadows at Hugo Pre Plat-PUD - 20210204.docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM February 5, 2021 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Meadows at Hugo Preliminary Plat Review WSB Project No. 013597-000 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the Preliminary Plat submittal for the Meadows at Hugo. We have reviewed the following information related to this application:
• The Meadows at Hugo Preliminary Plat/PUD Submittal dated January 26, 2021 by Civil Site Group
• The Meadows at Hugo Stormwater Management Report dated January 26, 2021 by Civil Site Group
• The Meadows at Hugo Preliminary Plat dated January 26, 2021 by Civil Site Group
• The Meadows at Hugo Geotechnical Report dated December 4, 2020 by Haugo GeoTechnical Services
• The Meadows at Hugo Preliminary Plat/PUD Narrative dated January 26, 2021 by Civil Site Group
• Phasing Plan Based on the review of the documents, we offer the following comments related to this application:
General/Access
1. The subject property is located north of 159th Street, south of 165th Street and east of Water Tower No. 3. The parcel doesn’t have any public roadway frontage at this time, however with the Oneka Place Development, the City had received Outllot J that would allow for access to the subject property. The proposed access road to the site extends through this Outlot and through the City owned property where our water tower resides. 2. The extension of the roadway to the development site would be the developer’s responsibility. The intersection at this location would remain with no stop controls at 159th Street and a stop condition on Farnham Avenue from the north and south. 3. With access proposed from Farnham Avenue, the proposed plan does show future roadway connections to the north, which will ultimately connect with 165th Street. Staff concurs with not providing access to the property to the east as it is guided industrial, however utilities will be extended to this property.
Ms. Rachel Juba February 5, 2021 Page 2
S:\Users\R_Juba\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\The Meadows at Hugo\Preliminary Plat and PUD\Engineer Comments\LTR-r juba-Meadows at Hugo Pre Plat-PUD - 20210204.docx
Utility Plan 4. As identified in the City’s Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan, a 24” trunk watermain is proposed to be extended north from the water tower location. The construction plans identify this 24” trunk watermain being extended through the development to the northern property line, with the City of Hugo paying for oversizing costs. 5. The City’s Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan identifies the way in which properties are to be served by sanitary sewer. A sanitary sewer connection to the MCES Interceptor is identified at 165th Street with a 36” trunk main, providing service to a large portion of land east of TH 61. The proposed plan identifies a connection to the MCES Interceptor approximately 1320 feet south of 165th Street which will ultimately make the development of the area more feasible considering the watermain is at the southwestern portion of the site and the connection to the MCES interceptor per the comprehensive sanitary sewer plan is approximately 1320 feet from the northern border of the development. 6. Due to the size of the and projected long-term flow anticipated in this sewer extension an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) would normally be required, however the City had prepared an Alternative Urban Areawide Assessment (AUAR) for the Everton Area in 2001. This plan has been updated every 5 years and contains the necessary information to fulfill the EAW requirements. 7. This trunk sanitary sewer is proposed to be constructed on the north property line of the development. The applicant has provided signed drainage and utility easements for the adjacent property to the north. The applicant will also be required to provide drainage and utility easements to the allow the sanitary sewer to be extended to the northeast up to 165th Street. Easements through parcel (PIN 0803121340002) will ensure the ability to extend the sewer up to 165th Street should the need arise. 8. Staff has asked MCES what process, if any, is required for the change in location of the connection to the MCES Interceptor from what is identified in the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan.
Stormwater Management/Wetlands 9. Applicant is meeting rate control and water quality stormwater requirements through multiple stormwater ponds adjacent to and hydraulically connected to the wetlands throughout the property. 10. The City requested the development use water reuse to provide the required water quality volume however the applicant has provided calculations and arguments which demonstrates why this isn’t feasible due to site constraints. Due to the minimal grade change across the site and the presence of wetlands throughout the site the stormwater ponds are hydraulically connected with the wetlands which restricts the amount of water which can be drawn from a stormwater pond for irrigation. For other developments that utilize a water reuse system, the ponds can draw down 3-4 feet without any negative consequences, however due to the hydraulic connection of the ponds and wetland, even drawing the pond down 6” has negative impacts on the wetlands. The applicant provided calculations showing that if water reuse were implemented, the wetlands would likely only receive water 1-2 times per year which would cause a loss of the onsite wetlands and would not be permitted under WCA regulations. 11. The applicant has applied for and received Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes (CAPROC) for a Rule I Permit with RCWD for work adjacent to and within JD 3. All changes requested by RCWD will need to be addressed. 12. The applicant is showing that all proposed lots meet the City’s freeboard requirements. 13. Additional detailed redline drainage comments have been provided to the applicant and will need to be addressed prior to the issuance of the stormwater permit. 14. A wetland delineation on the parcel was approved during the fall of 2018.
Ms. Rachel Juba February 5, 2021 Page 3
S:\Users\R_Juba\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\The Meadows at Hugo\Preliminary Plat and PUD\Engineer Comments\LTR-r juba-Meadows at Hugo Pre Plat-PUD - 20210204.docx
15. The plan has a number of impacts to wetlands and the applicant has provided an on-site wetland replacement plan. The Technical Evaluation Panel will be reviewing the replacement plan in the next 1-2 weeks. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463. Sincerely, WSB Mark Erichson, PE City Engineer cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) Peter Knaeble, Golden Valley Land Co. (email only) Matt Pavek, Civil Site Group (email only)
February 4, 2021
Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant
City of Hugo
14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North
Hugo, MN 55038
Re: DNR Approval of the Preliminary Plat and PUD for The Meadows at Hugo
Dear Ms. Weber,
Thank you for submitting to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) the Preliminary Plat and PUD for The
Meadows at Hugo. The plans, received January 19, 2021, were submitted to DNR prior to final approval by the
City as required by Minn. Rules 6120.3800, Subpart 1.
Minnesota’s shoreland management rules provide a comprehensive set of standards to preserve and enhance
the quality of surface waters, conserve the economic and natural environmental values of shorelands, and
provide for the wise use of water and related land resources. We greatly appreciate the early engagement
efforts by the developer and the City to work with DNR staff to apply the state’s shoreland standards for PUD
density and open space. As described in the attached email sent January 31, 2017 and in subsequent
communications, Hugo’s existing shoreland management ordinance does not include PUD standards compliant
with state law. Until the City amends its ordinance, DNR must approve all shoreland PUDs before final Council
approval to ensure compliance with the state’s shoreland PUD standards in Minn. Rules 6120.3800.
We reviewed the Preliminary Plat and PUD and determined it is compliant with the state’s rules for
residential PUDs in shoreland.
• The PUD preserves over 50% of the area within the shoreland district as permanent open space. The
actual percentage preserved is 58%.
• The PUD sets aside 70% of the shore impact zone for preservation in a natural state, including new on-
site wetland area for Wetland Conservation Act required mitigation.
• The developer properly conducted a density evaluation to determine the allowable number of dwelling
units in the shoreland district. By meeting the required design standards, the plan qualifies for a bonus
density increase in the allowable number of dwelling units (up to 27) in shoreland. The plan proposes a
total of 25 dwelling units in the shoreland district.
Prior to final approval by the City, please ensure that deed restrictions, covenants, permanent easements, public
dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and permanent means are in place to ensure long-term
preservation and maintenance of the open space as required by Minn. Rules 6120.3800, Subpart 5(C).
Please inform the developer that construction dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day of surface water or
groundwater, or one million gallons per year, for the construction of the homes, stormwater features, or utilities
at the proposed development will require a DNR Water Appropriation Permit.
Thank you for applying the state shoreland PUD standards to this development and for working to preserve and
enhance surface water quality. We encourage the City to amend its shoreland ordinance to adopt the shoreland
PUD provisions. When amended, DNR will no longer need to approve each PUD prior to Council approval.
Sincerely,
Dan Scollan
DNR East Metro Area Hydrologist
Attachments:
DNR’s Email dated January 31, 2017
CC: Jack Gleason, DNR South District Hydrologist Supervisor
Dan Petrik, DNR Land Use Program
From:Sorensen, Jenifer (DNR)
To:Rachel Juba
Cc:Petrik, Daniel (DNR)
Subject:RE: January Hugo TEP Meeting
Date:Tuesday, January 31, 2017 3:43:27 PM
Attachments:Shoreland Model Ordinance_010917_with commentary.pdf
Sec._90_137_SLDistrict_Downloaded072415.docx
2004-03-00HugoSLControls.pdf
1995-12-21HugoSLOrdApprovalwithFlex.pdf
1995-08-07HugoSLOrd.pdf
Shoreland Ordinance Review Checklist.docx
Rachel –
Attached is DNR’s recently updated shoreland (SL) model ordinance, including a section with the SL PUD standards.
Right now, Hugo’s SL ordinance does not include SL PUD standards. When a community does not have SL PUD
standards in its SL ordinance, DNR is required to approve SL PUDs to make sure they meet the SL PUD density and open
space requirements.
The last time that DNR reviewed and approved Hugo’s SL ordinance was in 1995 (see attached approval letter and
Hugo’s 1995 SL ordinance). At that time, the City’s SL ordinance contained the SL PUD standards. In 2004, area
hydrologist Travis Germundson contacted the City of Hugo to state that the City’s SL ordinance was no longer
substantially compliant with state standards (see attached). I don’t think any action has been taken since 2004 to get a
compliant ordinance in place.
So, there is a need to look at Hugo’s latest SL ordinance (attached) for compliance with state SL standards and update
the language for approval by DNR. The first step in the review is to compare the City’s current SL standards to DNR’s SL
ordinance review checklist (attached), to see what language is in and what language is not in the current City
ordinance. If all of the language is within one ordinance, this is pretty straightforward; if the SL standards are
embedded in other city code, it’s harder. If the SL ordinance is a standalone ordinance, the model ordinance can be
used as a template for an updated City SL ordinance, making the whole process a lot easier.
Would you like to visit first by phone to discuss approach, or would you like to set up an in-person meeting? I can come
up to Hugo’s City Hall. I’m available:
· Tuesday, February 7 – Any time before 2 pm
· Wednesday, February 8 – Before 12 pm
· Friday, February 10 – Before 3 pm
· Tuesday, February 14 – Any time
· Wednesday, February 15 – Any time
We can sure discuss the Creekside PUD concept layout as well and what they need to be incorporating into their
concept plan to meet the SL PUD standards.
Jen
Jenifer Sorensen
East Metro Area Hydrologist (Ramsey and Washington Counties)
Division of Ecological and Water Resources
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
1200 Warner Road
St Paul, MN 55106
Phone: 651-259-5754
Email: jenifer.sorensen@state.mn.us
Rice Creek Watershed District
Administrative Permit Application
Status Update
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
Permit Application Number: 20-120
Applicant: Joanne Benick (Thommes & Thomas Land
Clearing)
Project Location: Pin: 08.031.21.33.0001
Application Received: 12/29/2020
Date of Administrative Action: 02/03/2021
Current Status: Conditionally Approved Pending Receipt Of
Changes (CAPROC)
CAPROC Expiration Date: 02/03/2022
Please note the following:
• Status - Pursuant to RCWD Resolution 2009-09, this application is being granted
CAPROC status administratively after staff review and notice to the RCWD
Board of Managers.
• You are not authorized to begin site work until all pending items are satisfied as
enumerated in the attached Staff Review. If the project is initiated without
obtaining an RCWD Permit, it will be stopped by the District Inspector until the
permit is obtained.
• You have 12 months from the Date of Administrative Action to submit/satisfy all
pending items and receive a permit. Otherwise the conditional approval expires
and a new application, materials and fee will need to be submitted to the RCWD
for consideration.
• To satisfy pending items, applicants must submit two (2) paper copies of all
submittal items to the District with the exception of plan sheets. Plan sheets must
include 1 full-sized copy, and 1 reduced size (11 by 17 inches or smaller) or an
electronic file.
• Surety - for surety amounts of $5000 or less, the applicant must submit a check
made out to the RCWD. For surety amounts over $5000, the applicant must
provide the first $5000 in the form of a check and has the option of providing the
remainder of the surety amount in the form of a check, Letter of Credit (see
website for template) or performance bond.
• Easements – if an easement is required per your list of pending items in the
attached Engineer’s Report, then the legal descriptions of these easements must
be prepared by the applicant, reviewed and approved by the District, and then
submitted to the County Recorder’s Office for recording. An easement template
is on the District’s website.
• Wetland Conservation Act Forms - For projects involving wetland impacts and
replacement, State law requires the preparation and recording of Wetland Legal
Forms for replacement wetlands. Instructions for completing and recording these
forms are included in the wetland legal forms document on the website. The
wetland legal documents require the applicant to prepare legal descriptions of all
replacement wetlands. These legal descriptions and the forms must be reviewed
and approved by the District prior to submittal to the County Recorder’s Office for
recording.
• Stormwater Operation & Maintenance - For projects involving stormwater
ponds and infiltration features, applicants must complete and record a
Stormwater Operation and Maintenance Agreement (see website for template)
for these features unless a City assumes the maintenance responsibilities of
these features as indicated in a letter to the District. An exhibit and/or legal
description that clearly delineates and identifies all stormwater and infiltration
features must accompany the stormwater operation and maintenance
agreement. A draft of this agreement with accompanying exhibit must be
submitted to the District for review and approval prior to submission to the
County Recorder’s office.
Authorized Signature:
Nick Tomczik, Administrator
Date of Issuance: 02/03/2021
cc:
• City of Hugo;
• Matt Pavek (Civil Site Group), 4931 W 35th St. Ste 200, St. Louis Park, MN
55416 mpavek@civilsitegroup.com;
• Joanne Benick (Thommes & Thomas Land Clearing), P.O. Box 35, Scandia, MN
55073 jkbenick42@gmail.com
OFFICIAL DOCUMENT: The
Recommendations and Stipulations below
are incorporated as binding terms of RCWD
Permit 20-120 issued by the Administrator
under delegated authority of the RCWD
Board of Managers.
Houston Engineering Inc. Page 1 of 3 2/3/2021
Permit Application Number: 20-120
Permit Application Name: The Meadows at Hugo
Applicant/Landowner: Permit Contact:
Thommes & Thomas Land Clearing Civil Site Group
Attn: Joanne Benick Attn: Matt Pavek
P.O. Box 35 4931 W 35 st. Ste 200
Scandia, MN 55073 St. Lewis Park, MN 55416
Ph: 612-910-8062 Ph: 612-213-3944
jkbenick42@gmail.com mpavek@civilsitegroup.com
Project Name: The Meadows at Hugo
Purpose: PDS – Public/Private Drainage System; Single family homes subdivision and development.
Work within JD 3 Br 3
Site Size: 32.4± acre parcel / 26.5± acres of disturbed area; existing and proposed impervious areas
are 0± acres and 10.11± acres, respectively
Location: North of 159th Street, approximately 2,000± feet west of TH61, Hugo
T-R-S: SW ¼, Section 8, T31N, R21W
District Rule: I
Recommendation: CAPROC
It is recommended that this Permit Application be given Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes
(CAPROC) and outstanding items related to the following items.
Conditions to be Met Before Permit Issuance:
Rule I – Drainage Systems
1. Applicant must provide a 70-foot easement centered on the ditch specifying and encompassing a
District right of maintenance access for the public drainage system
2. Any stormwater pond outlet pipe and/or energy dissipation must be designed that no riprap extends
into the ditch channel and that the pipe be designed to accommodate ditch maintenance within the
ditch right-of-way (ROW) (no surface structures, enough cover to accommodate traversing
equipment, etc.).
3. To protect the Public Drainage System channel and prevent seepage through the ditch bank, the
applicant must provide an impermeable lining on the east side slope of the pond, along the border the
pond shares with the ditch.
4. The applicant must provide a detail in the plan set stating that the FES installation shall not protrude
from the ditch bank and no rip rap shall be placed within the JD 3 Branch 3 channel bottom.
RCWD Permit Number 20-120
Houston Engineering Inc Page 2 of 3 2/3/2021
Administrative
5. Send one final, signed 11x17 sized plan set to the District, and e-mail a full-sized pdf copy to both the
District and the District Engineer. Include a list of changes that have been made since approval by
the RCWD Board. Ensure the datum is labeled.
Stipulations: The permit will be issued with the following stipulations as conditions of the permit. By
accepting the permit, applicant agrees to these stipulations:
1. Provide an as-built survey (NAVD 88) of the invert elevations of culverts discharging into JD3 to verify
location and elevation with the approved plans.
Exhibits:
1. Plan set containing 35 sheets dated 1-05-2021 and received 1-05-2021.
2. Permit application dated 12-29-2020 and received 12-29-2020.
3. Project narrative, including stormwater calculations, dated 1-05-2021 and received 1-05-2021,
containing narrative, drainage maps, HydroCAD report for the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year rainfall
events for existing conditions.
Findings:
1. Description – This permit has been reviewed by the City of Hugo, which has LGU administration
authority for both the RCWD permit program (District Rules C, D, E and F) and WCA based upon the
RCWD Resolution 2004-20. This project also triggers Rule I due to the work within the public
drainage system right-of-way, which is not administered by the City of Hugo. The applicant is
proposing a new development consisting of 87 single-family homes, roads, and utility infrastructure,
including a new stormwater outlet to JD 3 Branch 3. Water will drain through a combination of
stormsewer and overland to a proposed pond bordering JD 3 Branch 3. No changes to the ditch are
proposed beyond the replacement of an existing outlet with a new stormwater outlet and no ditch
impediment or flow restricting structures are proposed. The area draining through the proposed pond
and into the ditch through the proposed connection includes 10.11± acres of impervious surface. All
stormwater draining to JD 3 Branch 3, drains to the Main Trunk, also called Clearwater Creek, an
impaired water. Clearwater Creek eventually drains to Peltier Lake, the Resource of Concern. The
applicant has submitted a $500 application fee, which corresponds to a Rule I permit review. This
permit was deemed complete on 1-5-2021, and thus reviewed under the RCWD 2021 Rules.
2. Stormwater – Rule C is administered by the City of Hugo.
3. Wetlands – The City of Hugo is the LGU for wetlands and therefore administers Rule F.
4. Floodplain – Rule E is administered by the City of Hugo.
5. Erosion Control – Rule D is administered by the City of Hugo.
6. Bridges and Culvert Crossing/Drainage Systems – The applicant is proposing to construct a large
stormwater treatment pond adjacent to the public drainage system ROW, with the outlet FES near
STA 99+00 on Branch 3 of the Anoka/Washington Judicial Ditch 3 system. The pond contours are
outside of the ROW, and no structures are planned on the top of the bank where it could impede
future access. Grading is proposed within the ROW but the slopes are within an acceptable range.
There is a proposed storm water outlet structure that has a proposed downstream FES invert at
elevation at 909.32, which is below the regulatory floodplain elevation in this area (913.24 NAVD 88).
No other stabilization feature has been proposed for the outlet invert.
RCWD Permit Number 20-120
Houston Engineering Inc Page 3 of 3 2/3/2021
Proposed peak rates to the ditch are required to be equal or less than existing rates. No volumetric
analysis was performed as the system is not volume constrained. The information above needs to be
submitted, otherwise the project complies with Rule I.
7. Documenting Easements– Applicant must meet the easement obligations for the public drainage
system.
8. Maintenance Obligations – Maintenance Obligation documents, including the outlet pipe within the
public drainage system ROW, are required under Rule C which is administered by the City of Hugo
for this permit.
9. Previous Permit Information – No previous permit information was found for this site.
I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and
that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota.
Katherine MacDonald, MN Reg. No 44590
Dan Bogart, MN Reg. No. 55539
The Meadows at Hugo
Preliminary Plat/PUD Narrative
1/26/21
Over the past couple of months, we have coordinated with City staff and the DNR in designing “The
Meadows at Hugo PUD” project. We are pleased to submit the Meadows at Hugo PUD Preliminary Plat
for your consideration.
Development Proposal Summary:
The development site is 32.93 acres (gross) and has 5.92 of delineated wetlands, for a net area of 27.01
acres. The current site is used as agricultural land. The site is bordered on the west by City undeveloped
park property, on the north by undeveloped agricultural land, on the east by County Ditch #3 and
undeveloped agricultural land, and on the south by a single-family subdivision. The property is currently
zoned Future Urban Service (FES), and is guided in the City’s 2040 Comprehensive Plans as Medium
Density Residential (MD).
We are proposing a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for this project. Our Preliminary Plat shows a total
of 87 single family villa lots for a net density of 3.22 units/acre. We are proposing two villa lot and
building types. 45 lots will be 50’ wide and are designed for 40’ wide one-story villa homes. 42 lots will
be 44’ wide and are designed for 29’ wide two-story villa homes. We are proposing 25’ front setbacks,
30’ rear setbacks, 5’ interior side and 15’ street side setbacks for the 50’ wide one-story villa lots and 25’
front setbacks, 30’ rear setbacks, 7.5’ interior side and 15’ street side setbacks for the 44’ wide two-
story villa lots. We are requesting PUD flexibility to achieve these lot standards and dimensions as
shown in the table below as compared to standard R-3 single family zoning. Please note, this project is
guided medium density which would allow for (R-4) townhomes up to 6 units per acre, 25’ front building
setbacks and 70% impervious coverage.
PUD Flexibility Requests
Required (R3) Proposed
2-Story Villa 1-Story Villa
Minimum lot size 10,400 sq. ft. 5,400 sq. ft. 6,750 sq. ft.
Minimum lot width at front setback line 80 ft. 44 ft. 50 ft.
Minimum lot depth 100 ft. 135 ft. 135 ft.
Minimum front yard building setback 30 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft.
Minimum side yard building setback 10 ft. 7.5 ft. 5 ft.
Minimum rear yard building setback 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft.
Maximum lot area covered by impervious
surface 50% Up to 55% Up to 60%
DNR Shoreland Overlay:
After meeting and working with the DNR, we have designed the Shoreland Overlay District area (300’
from County Ditch #3) to meet the DNR requirements for the Residential PUD requirements. We are
proposing 25 single family Villa lots and maintaining 50% open space, see DNR residential PUD Analysis
spreadsheet below.
These lots will meet all DNR PUD Shoreland Overlay District standards for single family Villa lots.
Our proposed PUD maintains, restores and creates a significant amount of wetland area, natural
environmental features, and public open space. We designed an internal trail system that will connect
to the future trails in the City park property to the west.
Our PUD will connect to Farham Ave. N. to the southwest with a public road through the City park
property. Per our discussions during Sketch Plan approval, we will pay for the site grading and road
improvements on the City park land, and for the City to pay for the utility improvements on the park
property. The Preliminary Plat also shows two future street connections to the north, that will
ultimately connect to 165th St. N. We are not showing a street connection to the east as this property is
zoned Business Park (BP) and guided as Industrial (IND).
Comprehensive Plan Amendment:
As shown on our Preliminary Utility Plan, we are proposing to connect to the Metropolitan Council’s
interceptor sewer at our northwest property corner. We would then extend the City’s 36” trunk
sanitary sewer line to our northeast property corner. This would require an update to the City’s 2040
Comprehensive Plan.
This project proposes to amend the comprehensive plan to gain access to trunk utilities (Sanitary Sewer
and Water) for this project as well as the future extension of trunk utilities to this area of the City. The
current comprehensive plan shows connections to trunk sanitary sewer at 165th Street (one parcel north
of our proposed connection point. Through conversations with City staff, it was determined that our
proposed trunk sanitary sewer connection point would serve as well as the original proposed location on
165th street for the surrounding properties and would enable this property to develop. Trunk water is
also served at our southwestern property corner near the water tower and will extend trunk water to
our north property line. This is a better location for trunk water connection in order to develop with the
comprehensive plan. Otherwise, the water would need to “leap frog” two parcels to reach 165th. The
trunk sanitary sewer and watermain will be constructed as part of this development and extended to
the project boundaries. This proposed trunk utility connection plan and modification to the
comprehensive plan is logical, prudent and efficient to begin the extension of City trunk utilities to this
area of the City.
PUD benefits:
Our development plan will provide several benefits over the standard medium density (townhome)
zoning:
1. An efficient use of land for single family residential construction that enables greater community
engagement and interaction.
2. Design is an environmentally sensitive proposal with less density than would be allowed under
medium density guidelines and attached townhomes.
3. Providing landscaping that exceeds the City minimum requirements.
4. Incorporating architectural design guidelines for homes in the development.
5. Villa product types that are appealing to different home buyers and enhancing visual interest of
the proposed neighborhoods.
6. Open space that promotes outdoor engagement and visual connectivity between residential
units and their surroundings.
7. Construction of a Public Street to provide access to the City park land at developer’s expense.
8. Construction of a trunk sanitary sewer connection to begin the expansion of development
potential in the area of the city with cost sharing with the City.
9. The extension of the City’s trail system thru the subdivision at developer’s expense.
These design details all demonstrate our commitment to providing a high-quality development worthy
of receiving the PUD designation. The creation of non-standard setbacks and lot sizes for the villa lots
requires the PUD zoning designation, which is the primary reason for our PUD request. The proposed
PUD subdivision creates a variety of lot types allowing for a diverse type of housing. Thus, the proposed
subdivision facilitates the mixed-use development goals sought after in the PUD Planned Unit
Development zoning standards. In addition, the proposed PUD will preserve to the maximum extent
possible the site’s natural environmental features, and provide for trail connections to the City park.
In addition to the PUD benefits described above we also considered stormwater reuse for irrigation for
the site. Stormwater Reuse for the purposes of irrigation is somewhat common in the City of Hugo and
for good reason. Conservation and sustainability. We have considered the possibility of stormwater re-
use for this project and have decided it is not feasible for this site for the following reasons.
1. The site has an extensive wetland system that needs all the stormwater runoff to be sustained.
The existing wetlands on the site constitute approximately 18% of the site area. Due to the
creation of new wetlands as part of the project development, at completion of the project the
area of wetlands will be approximately 21% of the site area. We are increasing wetland area
which drives a demand for stormwater. Stormwater sustains the wetlands.
2. The stormwater ponding for this site is directly connected to the wetland basins. All stormwater
runoff is needed so the wetland (existing and newly created) will not dry out.
3. If the stormwater basins are used for irrigation this water will be diverted away from the
wetlands and cause a wetland loss.
4. The change in runoff volume (from row crops to single family homes) is not enough of an
increase to offset the loss of runoff volume to a water re-use irrigation system.
5. The amount of runoff volume needed to sustain an irrigation system will not allow enough
runoff in both volume and frequency to leave the ponds and feed the wetlands.
6. Additional water reuse calculations and reasoning is contained in the project stormwater
management report.
Phasing plan and proposed development schedule:
The current” phase line” is shown on the preliminary plans. The project (home sites, streets and utilities)
will be developed in two phases (west and east). The entire project will be graded in one phase however
which is needed to implement the complex wetland mitigation and stormwater management plan as
well as earthwork balance. The west side of the development will be phase 1 and will be constructed in
2021. The east side of the development will be Phase 2 and will be constructed in 2023.
Housing Types:
Golden Valley Land Co. is partnering with Centra Homes as the exclusive builder for this project.
As discussed above, we are proposing two housing types that will fit on the proposed lots: 40’ wide
single level homes (on 50’ wide lots) and 29’ wide two story homes (on 44’ wide lots). Both housing
types will be slab on grade. We provided sample elevations of these homes in this narrative.
40’ Wide Single Level Homes:
These architecturally designed homes will range in size from 1,382 square feet up to 1,903 square feet
with a variety of elevations. The interiors will have 1-3 bedrooms and 2.5 bathrooms and 2 car garages.
We will work with the new homeowner to select exterior and interior options to create a home for
them. Sample elevations and floor plans are provided in Exhibit A
We have found that these homes appeal primarily to the empty nest buyers but also many other buyer
types (single professionals, move down buyer, etc.) like having a single level home. The homes have
been designed with special attention to the elevations to enhance the streetscape. The living space of
the home has been focused on the rear of the house to allow home buyers to enjoy the open space that
the majority of the lots will enjoy.
The 40’ wide single level homes will be built on lots with a 5’ side yard - thus 10’ between homes. In
discussion with City Staff a few questions were asked about the spacing of 10’ between homes. We
know of many neighborhoods in the Twin Cities area that are building homes with 10’ between homes.
To help Staff, Commission and Council better visualize this spacing, we have provided some pictures
(See Exhibit B) of the 10’ spacing. In addition, Centra Homes is building in a few subdivisions that have
this guideline and we can provide a list of neighborhoods if anyone would like to drive through some of
these neighborhoods.
29’ Wide Two Story Homes:
These homes will range in size from 1,777 square feet up to 2,337 square feet. These homes all have
three bedrooms and two and a half bathrooms. The larger floor plan has an optional fourth bedroom
that homeowners can select. Each home will also have a two car attached garage.
These homes are designed with young growing families in mind but we have found a variety of buyers
such as single parents, professionals and move down buyers. While working with architects we have
tried to minimize the garages by having living space over the garage and front stoops. We have
provided sample elevations and floor plans in Exhibit C.
Exhibit A:
40’ Wide Single Level Homes
Sample Elevations and Floor Plans
(on following pages)
Single-Level Home
The BROOKLAND
CENTRA HOMES LLC
CentraHomes.com
Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options!
1 – 2 Beds 1.5 – 2 Baths 2 Garage Bays 1,382 fsf
FEATURES:
Island Kitchen and Pantry
Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet
Flex Room
Elevation B - Colonial Elevation C - Cottage
Elevation A - Farmhouse
AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE:
Extended Patio
Covered Patio
Cabinet and Sink in Laundry Room
Gas Fireplace with Built-in Cabinets
Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom
Barn Door at Primary Bath
Deluxe Primary Bath
French Doors at Flex Room
Second Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room
Stone Accents Across Front of Home
Bedroom 2
11'1" x 11'
Dining Area
Mud
Room
Great Room
Garage
Optional Extended Patio
19'8" x 19'4"
9'8" x 11'
12'7" x 11'
15'10" x 14'6"
3'x6'
Opt. FireplaceOpt. Built-In
Cabinets
Kitchen
Patio
Optional Tray Vault
Flex Room /
Optional Bedroom 2
13'6" x 11'
Entry
Primary Suite
13'11" x 13'2"Opt.
Barn
Door
Covered
PorchMechanical
Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping
and elevation renderings are artist’s concepts, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard
on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions
and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home
site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales
Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. Effective 11/30/20. Equal Housing Opportunity.
CentraHomes.com
Single-Level Home
The BROOKLAND
Optional Primary Bath Shower
with Tile SurroundOptional Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room
1 – 2 Beds 1.5 – 2 Baths 2 Garage Bays 1,382 fsf
Farmhouse floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation.
Single-Level Home
The CEDARHOLM
CENTRA HOMES LLC
CentraHomes.com
FEATURES:
Island Kitchen and Pantry
Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet
Flex Room
Elevation B - Colonial Elevation C - Cottage
Elevation A - Farmhouse
Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options!
2 – 3 Beds 2 Baths 2 Garage Bays 1,611 fsf
AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE:
Extended Patio
Covered Patio
Mud Room Drop Zone
Mud Room Bench with Cubbies
Cabinet and Sink in Laundry Room
Gas Fireplace with Built-in Cabinets
Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom
Barn Door at Primary Bath
Deluxe Primary Bath
French Doors at Flex Room
Third Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room
Stone Accents Across Front of Home
Dining Area
Mud
Room
Covered
Porch
Great Room
Garage
Optional
Extended Patio
20'10" x 19'10"
9' x 12'6"
12'7" x 11'5"
13'1" x 14'7"
5'x3'
Opt. Fireplace
Opt. Built-In
Cabinets
Kitchen
Patio
Optional Tray Vault
Flex Room /
Optional Bedroom 3
12'8" x 11'
Entry
Mechanical
10'2" x 11'
Bedroom 2
Primary Suite
14'11" x 12'8"
Opt. Door to Patio
Opt. Drop Zone/
Opt. Bench with
Cubbies
Opt.
Barn
Door
Single-Level Home
The CEDARHOLM
2 – 3 Beds 2 Baths 2 Garage Bays 1,611 fsf
Farmhouse floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation.
Optional Bedroom
in Lieu of Flex Room
Bedroom 3
10'4" x 11'2"
Optional Primary Bath
Shower with Tile Surround Optional Deluxe Primary Bath
Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping
and elevation renderings are artist’s concepts, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard
on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions
and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home
site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales
Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. Effective 11/30/20. Equal Housing Opportunity.
CentraHomes.com
Single-Level Home
The MAJESTIC
CENTRA HOMES LLC
CentraHomes.com
FEATURES:
Island Kitchen and Walk-In Pantry
Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet
Flex Room
Elevation B - Colonial Elevation C - Cottage
Elevation A - Farmhouse
Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options!
2 – 3 Beds 2.5 Baths 2 Garage Bays 1,903 fsf
AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE:
Extended Patio
Covered Patio
Mud Room Drop Zone
Mud Room Bench with Cubbies
Cabinet and Sink in Laundry Room
Gas Fireplace with Built-in Cabinets
Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom
Barn Door at Primary Bath
Deluxe Primary Bath
French Doors at Flex Room
Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room
Stone Accents Across Front of Home
Exhibit B
Sample Pictures of Single Level Homes with 10’ between Homes
Exhibit C
29’ Wide Two Story Homes
Sample Elevations and Floor Plans
(on following pages)
Single-Level Home
The MAJESTIC
Opt. Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room
Opt. Primary Bath
Shower with Tile
Opt. Deluxe
Primary Bath
Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping
and elevation renderings are artist’s concepts, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard
on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions
and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home
site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales
Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. 12/1/20. Equal Housing Opportunity.
CentraHomes.com
2 – 3 Beds 2.5 Baths 2 Garage Bays 1,903 fsf
Farmhouse floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation.
Dining Area Mud
Room
Covered
Porch
Great Room
Garage
Optional
Extended Patio
21'8" x 20'
9' x 12'6"
11'9" x 12'9"
16'1" x 15'6"
3'x6'
Opt. FireplaceOpt. Built-In
Cabinets Kitchen
Patio
Optional Tray Vault
Flex Room /
Optional Bedroom 3
12'8" x 11'4"
Entry
Mech.
11'11" x 10'4"
Bedroom 2
Primary Suite
14'8" x 13'2"
Opt. Drop Zone/
Opt. Bench with
Cubbies
Laundry
Pantry
Opt.
Barn
Door
11'11" x 10'4"
Bedroom 2
12'8" x 10'4"
Bedroom 3
Two-Story Home
The BRIGHTWOOD
CENTRA HOMES LLC
CentraHomes.com
3 Beds 2.5 Baths 2 Garage Bays 1,777 fsf
FEATURES:
Covered Porch with Entry Closet
Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet
Convenient Upper-Level Laundry
Elevation B - Craftsman Elevation C - Prairie
Elevation A - Farmhouse
Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options!
AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE:
Extended Patio/Covered Patio
Gas Fireplace
Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom
Barn Door at Primary Bath
Primary Bath Shower with Tile Surround
Laundry Cabinet and Sink
Stone Accents Across Front of Home
Entry
Bedroom 2
Primary Suite
16'8" x 13'
12'4" x 10'1"
12'4" x 10'1"
Mech.
Bedroom 3
Laundry
Open to
Below
Optional Tray Vault
Opt. Sink
Opt. Barn Door
Upper Level
Optional Primary Bath
Shower with Tile Surround
Main Level
The BRIGHTWOOD C – Prairie
Two-Story Home
Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping
and elevation renderings are artist’s concepts, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard
on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions
and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home
site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales
Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. Effective 8/11/20. Equal Housing Opportunity.
CentraHomes.com
3 Beds 2.5 Baths 2 Garage Bays 1,777 fsf
Prairie floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation.
Two-Story Home
The DACOTAH
CENTRA HOMES LLC
CentraHomes.com
FEATURES:
Island Kitchen and Pantry
Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet
Loft
Elevation B - Craftsman Elevation C - Prairie
Elevation A - Farmhouse
Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options!
AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE:
Extended Patio/Covered Patio
Mud Room Bench & Cubbies
Mud Room Drop Zone
Gas Fireplace
Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom
Barn Door at Primary Bath
Deluxe Primary Bath
Laundry Cabinet and Sink
Stone Accents Across Front of Home
3 Beds 2.5 Baths 2 Garage Bays 2,063 fsf
Loft
Primary Suite
Laundry
12' x 11'
11'1" x 12'2"
13'6" x 16'
Opt. Barn Door
Bedroom 2
Open to
Below
11'3" x 10'2"
Bedroom 3
Mechanical
Optional Tray Vault
Opt. Sink
Dining Area
Opt. Bench w/
Cubbies
Mud
Room
Covered
Porch
Great Room Garage
Opt. Extended Patio
22'8" x 19'2"
12' x 12'
12' x 16'
12'6" x 16'
3'x6'
Opt. Fireplace
Kitchen
Patio Entry
Pantry
Upper Level
Optional Primary Bath
Shower with Tile Surround
Main Level
Two-Story Home
The DACOTAH A – Farmhouse
3 Beds 2.5 Baths 2 Garage Bays 2,063 fsf
Farmhouse floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation.
Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping
and elevation renderings are artist’s concepts, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard
on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions
and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home
site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales
Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. Effective 7/31/20. Equal Housing Opportunity.
CentraHomes.com
Two-Story Home
The REFUGE
CENTRA HOMES LLC
CentraHomes.com
FEATURES:
Island Kitchen and Large Walk-In Pantry
Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet
Loft
Elevation B - Craftsman Elevation C - Prairie
Elevation A - Farmhouse
Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options!
3 – 4 Beds 2.5 Baths 2 Garage Bays 2,329 – 2,337 fsf
AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE:
Extended Patio/Covered Patio
Mud Room Bench & Cubbies
Mud Room Drop Zone
Gas Fireplace with Built-in Cabinets
Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom
Deluxe Primary Bath / Barn Door
Laundry Cabinet and Sink
Fourth Bedroom in Lieu of Kid’s Loft
Stone Accents Across Front of Home
Optional Tray Vault
Opt. Sink
Bedroom 2
Primary Suite
15'8" x 13'8"
10'9" x 11'1"
11' x 11'10"
Mechanical
Bedroom 3 Kids’ Loft
11'1" x 11'1"
Open to Below
Opt. Barn Door
Dining Area
Opt. Bench w/
Cubbies
Mud
Room
Covered
Porch
Great Room
Garage
Opt.
Extended Patio
22'8" x 19'2"
10'6" x 13'
14'3" x 11'
15'6" x 15'
6'2"x3'
Opt. FireplaceOpt.
Built-In
Cabinets
Kitchen
Patio
Pantry
Study
10'11" x 11'
Entry
Optional
Bedroom 4
11'1" x 11'1"
Upper Level
Optional Primary Bath
Shower with Tile Surround
Main Level
Two-Story Home
The REFUGE
Optional Bedroom 4
with Walk-In Closet
Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping
and elevation renderings are artist’s concepts, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard
on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions
and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home
site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales
Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. Effective 7/31/20. Equal Housing Opportunity.
CentraHomes.com
3 –4 Beds 2.5 Baths 2 Garage Bays 2,329 – 2,337 fsf
Farmhouse floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation.
[11] Electrical TransmissionEasement per Doc. No. 185981 [13] Encroachment onto Sanitary SewerEasements per Doc. No. 3170523 and[12] Sewer Easement per Doc. No. 287225[12] Public UtilityEasement per Doc. No.3172032 Wire FenceWire FenceEdge of WaterEdge of Water[17] County Dicth JD #3
[1
7
]
C
o
u
n
t
y
D
i
c
t
h
J
D
#
3Edge of Wetland as Delineatedby Jacobson EnvironmentalEdge of Wetland as De
l
ineatedby Jacobson Environmenta
lEdge of Wetlandas Delineatedby JacobsonEnvironmentalEd
g
e
o
f
W
e
t
l
o
n
d
a
s
D
e
l
i
n
e
a
t
e
d
by
J
a
c
o
b
s
o
n
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Edge of Wetland as Delineatedby Jacobson EnvironmentalEdge of Wetland as Delineatedby Jacobson EnvironmentalEdge of Wetland as Delineatedby Jacobson EnvironmentalE
d
g
e
o
f
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
a
s
D
e
l
i
n
e
a
t
e
d
b
y
J
a
c
o
b
s
o
n
E
n
v
i
r
o
nm
e
n
t
a
l
Edge of Wetland asDelineated by JacobsonEnvironmentalEdge of WaterEdge of WaterEdge of Wetland asDelineated by JacobsonEnvironmentalEdge of Wetlandas Delineatedby JacobsonEnvironmentalEdge of Wetland as Delineatedby Jacobson Environmenta
lEdge of Wetland as Del
ineatedby Jacobson Environmenta
l ROAD 1
ROAD 2 ROAD 3ROAD 4ROAD 5432191011121361432132132154345765432116171865432165432181415192021717161514131210987654183212524232221201972678911123456789OUTLOT COUTLOT D
OUTLOT AOUTLOT BN00°50'53"E 1320.44
N89°29'46"E 1319.69S00°47'52"W 1324.35S89°40'02"W 1320.77N89°29'46"E 210.78S59°26'04
"W
160
.58S36°27'08"E83.30S53°59'00"E93.64S79°51'47"E92.47S00°00'00"E 130.53Δ=6°14'00"14.149
4
.
0
1Δ=11°55
'12
"35.37127.20199.72Δ=30°20'06"63.5350.54
3
7
.
4
0
Δ
=
6
3
°
0
1
'
3
3
"
R
=
3
4
.
0
0
Δ=141°18'19"147.97126.42
N0°50'53"E
78.25
79.42Δ=30°20'06"R=150.00N29°29'13"W 229.72N21
°
4
2
'
2
0
"
E
60.
0
0
N60°30'47
"E
253
.74
13
0
.
1
7
Δ
=
5
9
°
3
9
'
5
4
"
R
=
1
2
5
.
0
0
41.61Δ=11°55
'12
"R=200.00N4
8
°
3
5
'
3
4
"
E
9
4
.
0
1
72.27Δ=41°24'26"R=100.00N90°00'00"E100.00N00°50'53"E 328.863.43Δ=0°47'06"R=250.00N89°40'02"E189.74202.16Δ=46°19'56"R=250.00N
4
3
°
2
0
'
0
5
"
E
7
7
.
8
5
97.44Δ=17°10
'41
"R=325.00N60°30'47"E62.26102.93Δ=29°29'13"R=200.00N90°00'00"E73.68N26°51'19"W66.41N00°00'00"E 731.25
Δ=32
°
3
0
'
0
8
"
N
3
2
°
3
0
'
0
8
"
E
61
.
1
8
164.1
9
Δ=35
°
3
0
'
0
0
"
R=26
5
.
0
0N62°24'10"W92.8249.05Δ=28°06'04"R=100.00S89°29'46"W33.43156.02Δ=89°23'39"R=100.00N1°06'35"W
71.17
14
1
.
8
2
R=250.0
0S89°09'07"E140.2539.85N60°30'47"E47.51S60°30'47"W
125
.00S29°29'13"E 160.95Δ=
2
7
°
3
8
'
5
6
"
74.
8
0N89°09'07"W 142.29290.76
S29°29'13"E 150.01S29°29'13"E 144.0019.59Δ=44°22'45"170.40298.11
30.07Δ=18°08'06"N
4
2
°
1
4
'
5
7
"
E
1
5
.
4
7
4
6
.
3
3
4
6
.
3
3
4
6
.
3
3
4
6
.
3
3
44.0044.0044.0015.4729.3144.0044.00S60°44'51"W100.81
S00°00'00"E 115.41
S29°29'13"E42.31139.46N29°29'13"W2.77Δ=10°19'38"41.4644.0044.0027.50
S00°00'00"E 182.4344.0015.49Δ=4°36'21"28.54N29°29'13"W139.64Δ=7°10'46"44.48N29°29'13"W 140.97S29°29'13"E 147.48Δ=5°23'34"33.4112.204
6
.
0
5
Δ=19°09'36"76.9143.6861.50
37.41
N90°00'00"E 140.00N90°00'00"E 140.00N90°00'00"E 140.00N90°00'00"E 140.00N90°00'00"E 140.00N90°00'00"E 140.0040.4344.0044.0044.00
44.00
44.00
44.00 44.00 44.00 44.00 44.00 78.83 70.003
1
.
6
0
50.59Δ=41°24'26"
6
2
.
4
147.85Δ=11°55
'12
"8.7344.0044.0044.0044.0044.0025.0119.11Δ=11°31'42"49.74Δ=30°00'06"N29°29'13"W 157.45N29°29'13"W 144.85N29°29'13"W 144.92N29°29'13"W 140.12N29°29'13"W 140.30N29°29'13"W 140.48N29°29'13"W 140.66S29°29'13"E 140.84N48°27'09"W 203.79N18°41'36"W 211.24S12°3
4
'
0
7
"
W
2
0
4
.
5
5
Δ=31°15'43"
32.74
78.13Δ=29°45'33"31.16Δ=29°41'32"31.09Δ=35°45'41"37.45Δ=4°41'26"2.7811.91Δ=20°03'49"44.00 32.34 N78°08'41"W 143.74N89°09'07"W 146.57N89°09'07"W 148.63N89°09'07"W 148.63N89°09'07"W 150.43N89°09'07"W162.54Δ=7°39'52"24.08Δ=14°33'56"45.76Δ=8°06'18"25.4618.622.71N60°30'47
"E
125
.00N60°30'47"E
125
.0066.5461.5044.0044.0044.0044.0072.95Δ=22°09
'27
"59.94Δ=9°51'30"26.6717.4644.0044.0044.0044.0044.0044.0064.91137.2262.01 44.00 44.00 44.00 44.00 44.00S89°09'07"E 140.00S89°09'07"E 140.00S89°09'07"E 140.00S89°09'07"E 140.00S89°09'07"E 140.00S89°09'07"E 140.00Δ=0°34'28"2.814.04Δ=1°03'12"80.97139.9985.0150.0150.01S
4
3
°
1
3
'
5
5
"W
7
6
.
5
4
S00°50'53"W
89.318.4150.0150.018.75
51.65Δ=10°34'09"520.54Δ=28°43'50"140.40S46°39'55"E 152.42N27°04'29"E52.0850.55N34°50'35"EN63°16'17"E
92
.67
86.10
S00°00'00"E
N58°1
7
'
1
3
"
E
53.1744.17N59°14'06"E48.51Δ=46°19'11"S
4
3
°
4
0
'
4
9
"WS36°06'32"E 98.379
3
.
8
3 Δ=7°01'57"34.3715.725
0
.
0
0
12.13Δ=11°06'13"57.17Δ=6°04'28"31.2829.0033.27Δ=7°52'16"23.3564.14Δ=21°36'57"43.68111.6446.9545.72N25°34'29"W 141.49N29°29'13"W 140.50N35°33'41"W 137.42N46°39'55"W 128.27N46°39'55"W 135.73N11°25
'
3
0
"
E
1
3
4
.
5
3
N20°49'49"W 143.32N53°05'08"W 145.72S89°29'46"W 139.52S89°29'46"W 147.62S89°29'46"W 177.21S89°29'46"W 151.53S89°29'46"W 135.01S89°29'46"W 135.01S74°29'46"W 140.10S74°29'46"W 140.10S74°29'46"W 140.10S74°29'46"W 140.10S74°29'46"W 140.10S74°29'46"W 140.10S74°29'46"W 140.10N74°29'46"E 140.10N90°00'00"E 144.89N90°00'00"E144.89S74°29'46"W 140.12S74°29'46"W 151.96S89°29'46"W 158.12S89°29'46"W 165.90S89°29'46"W 157.53S89°29'46"W 147.64S89°29'46"W 142.25N89°29'46"E 140.10S2
6
°
1
6
'
2
2
"
W
1
7
2
.
5
5
N10°10'
3
2
"
E
1
4
3
.
7
3
N
4
5
°
1
7
'
5
4
"
E
1
6
0
.
2
7
N2
6
°
4
4
'
0
5
"
E
1
6
0
.
2
7
N08°10'16
"
E
1
4
8
.
3
4
N00°30'14"W 145.76 Δ=19°25
'02
"44.06
Δ
=
1
8
°
3
3
'
4
9
"
4
2
.
1
2
Δ=1
8
°
3
3
'
4
9
"
42.1
2
19.68
Δ=8°40'30"
34.33
Δ=28°06'04"26.646.79
64.4368.6276.27Δ=21°2
6
'
4
7
"
104.815.63192.2271.49Δ=2°02'15"4.62Δ=22°08'13"50.2330.0030.0070.85
75.8172.1492.52N00°30'14"W 140.11
Δ=35°
4
9
'
0
6
"
146.9
1Δ=89°23'39"109.225.07
28.36Δ=7°34'41"
17.19
Δ=1
9
°
1
1
'
5
4
"
43.5
6
Δ=
1
°
1
9
'
2
8
"
3.
0
064.365
5
.
1
0
30.0330.03Δ=9°48'27"50.50Δ=6°36'55"50.2351.10
Δ=6°43'
5
0
"Δ=10°11'50"52.50Δ=10°23'04"53.4752.7
9
Δ=6
°
5
7
'
1
0
"
55.
5
4
Δ=
7
°
1
8
'
5
6
"
3.
3
1
57
.
8
7
Δ=0°27'19"1.75Δ=14°26'42"55.46Δ=17°36'07"67.5911.4452.0058.79
44.0062.7970.00Δ=35°10'26"79.8186.53 44.00
Δ=4°51'25"25.01397.86Δ=3°37'02"27.4631
.
6
2
1
8
.
4
6
Δ=9°59'21"26.15Δ=21°38'48"56.672
.
2
7
Δ=
0
°
5
1
'
5
9
"50.08S32°30'08"WΔ
=
3
2
°
1
5
'
1
9
"
33
.
7
8
Δ=32°15'19"
33.78
Δ=32°15'19"33.78Δ=24°48'28"25.98Δ=50°33'48"52.9531.77Δ=30°20'19"9.74110.8363.81120.00S2
3
°
1
3
'
4
3
"
W
1
1
3
.
8
2 Δ=67°33'45"40.09Δ=1°13'58"0.7349.27 50.00 57.50 53.26 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 58.59
S00°00'00"E 593.71
R=4
3
5
.
0
0
Δ=31°
1
3
'
5
4
"
237.12
85.0
9
Δ=3
2
°
3
0
'
0
8
"
R=1
5
0
.
0
034.51S28°36'27"ES27°17'35"E56.0131.47S25°36'32"E52.03S10°00'02"E50.38
S04°42'18"W46.11S18°36'44"W19.5621.8030.2320.2730.11
71.
9
3
41.
8
8
57.50 89.52 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 52.00 58.59 56.53
43.32N12°00'24"EN2
8
°
1
7
'
1
8
"
E
64
.
3
0
N
3
4
°
0
1
'
5
6
"
E
1
0
0
.
1
5
N
3
0
°
3
4
'
2
1
"
E
1
5
8
.
1
4
N2
5
°
2
2
'
1
4
"
E
75.
1
8
N00°34'39"E 146.89N02°25'00"W 267.50N01°13'19"W
138.04
N06°59'43"E
2
4
2
.
2
9
N11°33
'
1
5
"
E
1
4
9
.
7
1
44.00 44.00 44.00 44.00 44.00 66.60 133.12 81.02 109.30144.51OUTLOT E280.42Δ=267°46'48"R=60.00N66°05'38"E60.00N26°07'34"W60.00260.54Δ=248°47
'43
"R=60.00N90°00'00"E60.00S21
°
1
2
'
1
7
"
W
70.
0
0
40.82
Δ=68°47'43"
R=34.00
49.361090.5473.12S00°18'43"E
76.10C1
65.91302.41Δ=27°35
'
5
0
"
120
.
4
2
OUTLOT FVICINITY MAPThe Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, Washington County, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land Company
PROJECTPROJECT NO.: 18301COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONV2.0PRELIMINARY PLAT1-26-21Lot Configuration2-4-21Add Outlot F........N44565RORY L. SYNSTELIENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY,PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.12-4-2020NCLIENT OVERHEAD UTILITIESFIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERTELEPHONE LINECABLE LINE WATERMAINELECTRIC LINEGASMAINCHAINLINK FENCELINESIGNSANITARY MANHOLESTORM MANHOLECABLE TV BOXTELEPHONE MANHOLEELECTRIC TRANSFORMERTELEPHONE BOXTRAFFIC SIGNALGAS METERELECTRICAL METERWATER MANHOLEWATER VALVEAIR CONDITIONERBOLLARDCATCH BASINELECTRIC MANHOLEGAS VALVEFLAG POLEHANDICAP SYMBOLFOUND IRON MONUMENTHYDRANTCAST IRON MONUMENTSET IRON MONUMENTFLARED END SECTIONLinetype & Symbol Legend POWER POLEUTILITY MANHOLECONCRETE SURFACEPAVER SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEGRAVEL/LANDSCAPE GUY WIRECONIFEROUS TREEDECIDUOUS TREESURFACEWOODEN FENCELINEGUARDRAILROOF DRAINCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060QA/QCFIELD CREWDRAWN BYREVIEWED BYUPDATED BY.CJRS.PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTESPROPERTY DESCRIPTION:The Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, according to the UnitedStates Government Survey thereof, Washington County, Minnesota.DATE OF PREPARATION:12-04-2020APPLICANT:Golden Valley Land CompanyPeter Knaeble612-309-92156001 Glenwood Ave, Golden Valley, MN 55422BENCHMARKS:Elevations are based on the NGVD 29 Datum. Site Benchmark is the top nut hydrant located on the north side of 159thSt N, having an elevation of 926.69 feet. As shown hereon.EXISTING ZONING:FUS (Future Urban Service)PROPOSED ZONING:PUD (MDR)AREAS:The Gross land area is 1,745,448 +/- square feet or 40.07 +/- acres.NOTE: For Proposed Lot Areas, See Site PlanFLOOD ZONE:This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per FloodInsurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27163C0136E, effective date of February 3, 2010.________________________________________________________Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565rory@civilsitegroup.comPRELIMINARY PLAT: THE MEADOWS AT HUGO160408004080SCALE IN FEET
Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC0.0TITLE SHEET............SHEET INDEXSHEET NUMBERSHEET TITLEC0.0TITLE SHEETSITE LOCATIONSITE LOCATION MAPNSITE SURVEYV1.1WETLAND MITIGATION PLANW1.0SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONSSW1.0GRADING PLANC3.2C5.0C5.1L1.1CIVIL DETAILSLANDSCAPE PLANSWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONSSW1.1SWPPP - DETAILSSW1.2C2.1SITE PLANSWPPP - NARRATIVESW1.3CIVIL DETAILSC1.0REMOVALS PLANC5.2CIVIL DETAILSKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRSWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.4SWPPP - ATTACHMENTSSW1.5L1.2LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES & DETAILSALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN AREAPPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS,48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THECONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIESTHAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NOCOST TO THE OWNER.The Meadows at HugoHUGO, MINNESOTAISSUED FOR: CITY RESUBMITTALDEVELOPER:Golden Valley Land Company6001 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422CONTACT: Peter Knaeblepeterknaeble@gmail.com612-309-9215ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT:CIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CONTACT: Matt Pavek612-615-0060SURVEYOR:GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER:Haugo Geotechnical ServicesCONTACT: Paul Haugophaugo@haugogts.com612-729-2959CIVIL SITE GROUP4931 W 35TH STREETSUITE 200ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416CONTACT: RORY SYNSTELIEN612-615-0060UTILITY PLAN (SAN WATER)C4.2GRADING PLANC3.1C2.2SITE PLANUTILITY PLAN (SAN WATER)C4.1C5.3CIVIL DETAILSL1.0OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLANOVERALL UTILITY PLANC4.0OVERALL GRADING PLANC3.0C2.0OVERALL SITE PLANUTILITY PLAN (STORM)C4.3UTILITY PLAN(STORM)C4.4SITE SURVEYV1.2SITE SURVEYV1.3SITE SURVEYV1.4WETLAND MITIGATION PLANW1.1WETLAND MITIGATION PLANW1.2WETLAND ALTERNATE PLANW1.3C2.3OFF SITE EASEMENT EXHIBITWETLAND CONSULTANT:JACOBSON ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC5821 HUMBOLDT AVE NORTHBROOKLYN PARK, MN 55430612-802-6619PRELIMINARY PLATV2.0
[11] Electrical TransmissionEasement per Doc. No. 185981 [13] Encroachment onto Sanitary SewerEasements per Doc. No. 3170523 and[12] Sewer Easement per Doc. No. 287225[12] Public UtilityEasement per Doc. No.3172032 S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44N89°40'02"E 1320.77N00°47'52"E 1324.35(Width Varies)159TH ST N(A Public R/W)VICINITY MAPThe Meadows at Hugo
Washington County, MN 55038
6001 Glenwood Ave, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land Company
PROJECTPROJECT NO.: 18301COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONV1.0ALTA/NSPS LANDTITLE SURVEY12-15-20Title Commitment1-5-21Add NAVD88 Conversion Note........N44565RORY L. SYNSTELIENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY,PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.11-24-20NCLIENTOVERHEAD UTILITIESSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATERMAINELECTRIC LINEGASMAINCHAINLINK FENCELINESIGNSANITARY MANHOLESTORM MANHOLEELECTRIC TRANSFORMERTELEPHONE BOXELECTRICAL METERWATER MANHOLEWATER VALVECATCH BASINELECTRIC MANHOLEGAS VALVEFOUND IRON MONUMENTHYDRANTCAST IRON MONUMENTSET IRON MONUMENTFLARED END SECTIONLinetype & Symbol Legend POWER POLEUTILITY MANHOLECONCRETE SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEGRAVEL/LANDSCAPE GUY WIRESURFACEWOODEN FENCELINEROOF DRAINCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060QA/QCFIELD CREWDRAWN BYREVIEWED BYUPDATED BYJWNJRNCJ.DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYEDThe Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota.Abstract Property.ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Notes(numbered per Table A)1.Bearings are based on the Washington County Coordinate System (1986 Adjustment).2.Site Address: Unassigned.3.This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map,Community Panel No. 27163C0136E, effective date of February 3, 2010.4.The Gross land area is 1,745,448 +/- square feet or 40.07 +/- acres.5.Elevations are based on the NGVD 29 Datum. Site Benchmark is the top nut hydrant located on the north side of 159th St N, having an elevationof 926.69 feet. As shown hereon.NOTE: To convert from NGVD 29 Datum to NAVD 88 Datum, add 0.15 of a foot.6.The current Zoning for the subject property is was not provided.Please note that the general restrictions for the subject property may have been amended through a city process. We could be unaware of suchamendments if they are not in a recorded document provided to us. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the ZoningAdministrator for the current restrictions for this site.9.We did not observe any striped parking stalls on subject property.11.We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from the following sources:plans obtained from utility companies, plans provided by client, markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources. We have used thisinformation to develop a view of the underground utilities for this site. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground featurescannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised thatexcavation may be necessary. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on thesubject property.13.The names of the adjoining owners of the platted lands, as shown hereon, are based on information obtained from Washington County GIS.18. The wetland delineation was performed by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC, the report is dated September 13, 2018.SURVEY REPORT1. This map and report was prepared with the benefit of a Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Land Title Inc, as agent for First American TitleInsurance Company, File No. 626322, dated October 30, 2020. We note the following with regards to Schedule B of the herein referenced TitleCommitment:a. Item no.'s 1-10 and 17 are not survey related.b. The following are numbered per the referenced title Commitment: 11. Easement for electric in favor of Northern States Power Company, dated June 11, 1956, filed June 19, 1956, as Document No. 185981,Book 200 Deeds Page 556, Assignment and Assumption of Easements dated February 7, 2001, filed March 8, 2001 as Document Number3145752. As shown hereon over the west 27 feet of subject property. 12. Easement in favor of Metropolitan Sewer Board dated February 25, 1971, filed March 1, 1971, as Document No. 287225, Book 311 Deeds,Page 160. As shown hereon over the west 35 feet of subject property. 13. Consent to Allow Encroachment onto Sanitary Sewer Easements dated July 16, 2001, filed July 25, 2001, as Document No. 3170523. Asshown hereon over the west 35 feet of subject property. 14. Easement for Public Utility and Municipal Water purposes dated July 17, 2001, filed August 3, 2001, as Document No. 3172032. As shownhereon over part of the southwest corner of subject property. 16. Regulations and restrictions imposed on designated wetlands shown on available maps. Wetlands are shown hereon throughout subjectproperty. See sheets 2, 3 and 5. 17. Branch No. 3 of Judicial Ditch 3, aka County to County Ditch 3, as shown by available section maps. See sheets 2 and 3.ALTA CERTIFICATIONTo: Centra Homes, LLC; Thommes & Thomas Land Clearing, a partnership under the laws of the State of Minnesota; Golden Valley Land Company;First American Title Insurance Company; and Land Title, Inc.:This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard DetailRequirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 13of Table A thereof. The field work was completed on 11-23-2020.Dated this 24th day of November, 2020.________________________________________________________Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565rory@civilsitegroup.com160408004080SCALE IN FEETBOLLARD
[11] Electrical TransmissionEasement per Doc. No. 185981 [13] Encroachment onto Sanitary SewerEasements per Doc. No. 3170523 and[12] Sewer Easement per Doc. No. 287225
DitchEdge of WaterMatch (See Sheet 2)Line (See Sheet 3)[17] County Dicth JD #3
[1
7
]
C
o
u
n
t
y
D
i
c
t
h
J
D
#
3Edge of Wetland as Delineatedby Jacobson EnvironmentalEdge of Wetland as Delineatedby Jacobson EnvironmentalEdge of Wetlandas Delineatedby JacobsonEnvironmentalEd
g
e
o
f
W
e
t
l
o
n
d
a
s
D
e
l
i
n
e
a
t
e
d
by
J
a
c
o
b
s
o
n
E
n
v
i
r
o
n
m
e
n
t
a
l
Edge of Wetland as Delineatedby Jacobson EnvironmentalEdge of Wetland as Delineatedby Jacobson EnvironmentalEdge of Wetland as Delineatedby Jacobson EnvironmentalVICINITY MAPThe Meadows at Hugo
Washington County, MN 55038
6001 Glenwood Ave, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land Company
PROJECTPROJECT NO.: 18301COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cN44565RORY L. SYNSTELIENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY,PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.11-24-20CLIENT Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060QA/QCFIELD CREWDRAWN BYREVIEWED BYUPDATED BYJWNJRNCJ.NOVERHEAD UTILITIESSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATERMAINELECTRIC LINEGASMAINCHAINLINK FENCELINESIGNSANITARY MANHOLESTORM MANHOLEELECTRIC TRANSFORMERTELEPHONE BOXELECTRICAL METERWATER MANHOLEWATER VALVECATCH BASINELECTRIC MANHOLEGAS VALVEFOUND IRON MONUMENTHYDRANTCAST IRON MONUMENTSET IRON MONUMENTFLARED END SECTIONLinetype & Symbol Legend POWER POLEUTILITY MANHOLECONCRETE SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEGRAVEL/LANDSCAPE GUY WIRESURFACEWOODEN FENCELINEROOF DRAINBOLLARDREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONV1.1ALTA/NSPS LANDTITLE SURVEY12-15-20Title Commitment1-5-21Add NAVD88 Conversion Note........100255002550SCALE IN FEET
[12] Public Utility Easementper Doc. No. 3172032 Wire FenceWire FenceEdge of WaterMatch (See Sheet 2)Line (See Sheet 3)(Width Varies)Match (See Sheet 3)Line (See Sheet 4)Edge of Wetlandas Delineatedby JacobsonEnvironmentalEdge of Wetland asDelineated by JacobsonEnvironmentalEdge of Wetland asDelineated by JacobsonEnvironmentalGarageEdge of WaterEdge of WaterEdge of Wetland asDelineated by JacobsonEnvironmentalEdge of Wetlandas Delineatedby JacobsonEnvironmentalEdge of Wetland as Del
ineatedby Jacobson EnvironmentalEdge of Wetland as Delineatedby Jacobson Environmental159TH ST N(A Public R/W)VICINITY MAPThe Meadows at Hugo
Washington County, MN 55038
6001 Glenwood Ave, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land Company
PROJECTPROJECT NO.: 18301COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cN44565RORY L. SYNSTELIENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY,PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.11-24-20CLIENT Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060QA/QCFIELD CREWDRAWN BYREVIEWED BYUPDATED BYJWNJRNCJ.NOVERHEAD UTILITIESSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATERMAINELECTRIC LINEGASMAINCHAINLINK FENCELINESIGNSANITARY MANHOLESTORM MANHOLEELECTRIC TRANSFORMERTELEPHONE BOXELECTRICAL METERWATER MANHOLEWATER VALVECATCH BASINELECTRIC MANHOLEGAS VALVEFOUND IRON MONUMENTHYDRANTCAST IRON MONUMENTSET IRON MONUMENTFLARED END SECTIONLinetype & Symbol Legend POWER POLEUTILITY MANHOLECONCRETE SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEGRAVEL/LANDSCAPE GUY WIRESURFACEWOODEN FENCELINEROOF DRAINBOLLARDREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONV1.2ALTA/NSPS LANDTITLE SURVEY12-15-20Title Commitment1-5-21Add NAVD88 Conversion Note........100255002550SCALE IN FEET
[12] Public Utility Easementper Doc. No. 3172032
N89°40'02"E 1320.77Wire FenceEdge of Water(Width Varies)Match (See Sheet 3)Line (See Sheet 4)Edge of Wetland asDelineated by JacobsonEnvironmentalGarageEdge of WaterEdge of WaterEnvironmentalEdge of Wetland as Del
ineatedby Jacobson EnvironmentalEdge of Water159TH ST N(A Public R/W)VICINITY MAPThe Meadows at Hugo
Washington County, MN 55038
6001 Glenwood Ave, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land Company
PROJECTPROJECT NO.: 18301COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cN44565RORY L. SYNSTELIENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY,PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.11-24-20CLIENT Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060QA/QCFIELD CREWDRAWN BYREVIEWED BYUPDATED BYJWNJRNCJ.NOVERHEAD UTILITIESSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATERMAINELECTRIC LINEGASMAINCHAINLINK FENCELINESIGNSANITARY MANHOLESTORM MANHOLEELECTRIC TRANSFORMERTELEPHONE BOXELECTRICAL METERWATER MANHOLEWATER VALVECATCH BASINELECTRIC MANHOLEGAS VALVEFOUND IRON MONUMENTHYDRANTCAST IRON MONUMENTSET IRON MONUMENTFLARED END SECTIONLinetype & Symbol Legend POWER POLEUTILITY MANHOLECONCRETE SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEGRAVEL/LANDSCAPE GUY WIRESURFACEWOODEN FENCELINEROOF DRAINBOLLARDREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONV1.3ALTA/NSPS LANDTITLE SURVEY12-15-20Title Commitment1-5-21Add NAVD88 Conversion Note........100255002550SCALE IN FEET
[12] Public Utility Easement
per Doc. No. 3172032 Wire FenceWater TowerEdge of WoodsGravel DriveWire FenceMatch (See Sheet 2)Line (See Sheet 3)159TH ST N(A Public R/W)(Width Varies)Match (See Sheet 3)Line (See Sheet 4)Edge of Wetlandas Delineatedby JacobsonEnvironmentalE
d
g
e
o
f
W
e
t
l
a
n
d
a
s
D
e
l
i
n
e
a
t
e
d
b
y
J
a
c
o
b
s
o
n
E
n
v
i
r
o
nm
e
n
t
a
l
Edge of Wetland asDelineated by JacobsonEnvironmentalGarageEdge of WaterUpper BowlWater Tower(per AerialPhotos)159TH ST N(A Public R/W)VICINITY MAPThe Meadows at Hugo
Washington County, MN 55038
6001 Glenwood Ave, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land Company
PROJECTPROJECT NO.: 18301COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cN44565RORY L. SYNSTELIENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY,PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY MEOR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION ANDTHAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THESTATE OF MINNESOTA.11-24-20CLIENT Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060QA/QCFIELD CREWDRAWN BYREVIEWED BYUPDATED BYJWNJRN..NOVERHEAD UTILITIESSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATERMAINELECTRIC LINEGASMAINCHAINLINK FENCELINESIGNSANITARY MANHOLESTORM MANHOLEELECTRIC TRANSFORMERTELEPHONE BOXELECTRICAL METERWATER MANHOLEWATER VALVECATCH BASINELECTRIC MANHOLEGAS VALVEFOUND IRON MONUMENTHYDRANTCAST IRON MONUMENTSET IRON MONUMENTFLARED END SECTIONLinetype & Symbol Legend POWER POLEUTILITY MANHOLECONCRETE SURFACEBITUMINOUS SURFACEGRAVEL/LANDSCAPE GUY WIRESURFACEWOODEN FENCELINEROOF DRAINBOLLARDREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONV1.4ALTA/NSPS LANDTITLE SURVEY12-15-20Title Commitment1-5-21Add NAVD88 Conversion Note........100255002550SCALE IN FEET
[13] Electrical Transmission
Easement per Doc. No. 185981
[15] Encroachment onto Sanitary Sewer
Easements per Doc. No. 3170523 and
[17] Sewer Easement per Doc. No. 287225
[14] Public Utility Easement
per Doc. No. 3172032
S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44
N89°40'02"E 1320.77N00°47'52"E 1324.35Wire FenceWater TowerEdge of WoodsGravel DriveWire FenceDitchEdge of WaterEdge of WaterEdge of WaterREMOVE EXISTINGTREES, TYP.LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION, TYP.LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION, TYP.LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION, TYP.LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION, TYP.REMOVE ALL EXISTINGDRAINTILE FOUND DURINGCONSTRUCTIONOPERATIONSREMOVE ALL EXISTINGDRAINTILE FOUND DURINGCONSTRUCTIONOPERATIONSREMOVE ALL EXISTINGDRAINTILE FOUND DURINGCONSTRUCTIONOPERATIONSLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION, TYP.LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION, TYP.REMOVE FENCE,TYP.REMOVE FENCE,TYP.REMOVE FENCE,TYP.REMOVE FENCE,TYP.REMOVE FENCE,TYP.REMOVE FENCE,TYP.REMOVE FENCE,TYP.REMOVE FENCE,TYP.REMOVE FENCE,TYP.REMOVE CULVERTREMOVE EXISTING CURB ANDGUTTER AS NECESSARY FORNEW CONSTRUCTION.SEE WETLAND PLAN, W1.0 FORWETLAND PROTECTION, REMOVALSAND REPLACEMENT.SEE WETLAND PLAN, W1.0 FORWETLAND PROTECTION, REMOVALSAND REPLACEMENT.SEE WETLAND PLAN, W1.0 FORWETLAND PROTECTION, REMOVALSAND REPLACEMENT.SEE WETLAND PLAN, W1.0 FORWETLAND PROTECTION, REMOVALSAND REPLACEMENT.SEE WETLAND PLAN,W1.0 FOR WETLANDPROTECTION,REMOVALS ANDREPLACEMENT.SEE WETLAND PLAN, W1.0 FORWETLAND PROTECTION, REMOVALSAND REPLACEMENT.LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION, TYP.35'35'35'10'10'REMOVALS LEGEND:REMOVE EXISTING TREES - INCLUDING ROOTS ANDSTUMPSCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTAL01" = 80'-0"80'-0"40'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC1.0REMOVALS PLAN............Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALREMOVAL NOTES:1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN.3.REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.4.REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.5.EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS.6.REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF-SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS.7.ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS.8.EXISTING ON-SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT.9.PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDESTAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS.10.MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS.11.DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCEWITH THE CITY.12.PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.13.SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THECONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY.14.VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THECONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.15.ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THISSHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROADCLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.16.SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITIES.17.STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY.18.ALL EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC/REGULATORY SIGNAGE TO BE INVENTORIED AND IF REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TO LGU.19.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:DRIPLINE WIDTH1DLTREE PROTECTIONN T S25'FURNISH A AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIP LINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS ASSHOWN ON PLAN, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHERE POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25' BEYOND DRIPLINE. PLACE TREE PROTECTION SIGN ON POSTS, ONE PER INDIVIDUAL TREE (FACING CONSTRUCTIONACTIVITY), OR ONE EVERY 100' LF ALONG A GROVE OR MULTI-TREE PROTECTION AREA.POSTS AND FENCINGEXTEND FENCE 25'BEYOND DRIPLINEWHERE POSSIBLETREE PROTECTION SIGN, TYP.TREE DRIPLINE, ORCONSTRUCTION LIMITSCITY OFHUGO REMOVAL NOTES:1.ANY EXISTING PORTIONS OF FINALE AVENUE THAT ARE TO BE ABANDONED ORREMOVED SHALL HAVE ALL PAVEMENT AND BASE MATERIALS REMOVED ANDREPLACED WITH TOPSOIL. COORDINATE WITH CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2.CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE EXISTING UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE ALONGEXISTING PORTIONS OF FINALE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WHO MAY BEINVOLVED. RELOCATION, REMOVAL OR PROTECTION OF EXISTING UTILITIES MUST BEAGREED UPON AND COORDINATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.
[13] Electrical TransmissionEasement per Doc. No. 185981[14] Public Utility Easementper Doc. No. 3172032
S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44
N89°40'02"E 1320.77Wire FenceWater TowerEdge of WoodsGravel DriveEdge of WaterEdge of WaterEdge of Water159TH ST N(A Public R/W)WETLAND A63,656 SFWETLAND D110,900 SFWETLAND H1555 SF(DITCHED)WETLANDWETLANDWETLANDWETLANDWETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND G16,910 SFWETLAND E67,678 SFWETLAND B13889 SF(FARMED)FILLWETLAND C13104 SFFARMEDFILLWETLAND 858,590 SFDITCH 7WETLAND 858,590 SFWETLAND 10/1320,749 SFWETLAND D4DITCH1331 SFFILLWETLAND G1FARMED / DITCH10,645 SFFILLWETLAND G2FARMED705 SFFILLWETLAND A2FARMED13,167 SFFILLWETLAND D2DITCHED20,011 SFFILLWET CREATION 27659 SFWET CREATION 35860 SFWET CREATION 117,984 SFWET CREATION 431,576 SFWETLAND D23774 SFWETLAND X2224 SFFILLWETLAND XBASIN 1NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.64BASIN 2NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.54BASIN 3NWL=915.00OUTLET EL=915.00100-YR HWL=916.41BASIN 4NWL=913.00OUTLET EL=913.00OUTLET EOF=914.50100-YR HWL=914.93BASIN 5NWL=911.50OUTLET EL=911.50100-YR HWL=913.46WETLAND A1318 SFFILLWET RESTORE 27959 SFWET RESTORE 1949 SFWET RESTORE 44653 SFWET RESTORE 53897 SFWET RESTORE 33089 SFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOF914.50EOFEOFEOFWET CREATION 521,652 SFWETLAND D3DITCH2077 SFFILL2
5
'10'25'25'10'25'32
.
2
'
1
2
.
1
'36.9'25'10.5'10.5
'12.2'25.4'50.6'55.2'25'25'25'25'1
2
.
7
'
10'10'69.6
'25'25'31.7'25'25'25'29.7'15'15'15'15'15'25'26.2'30.7'33'25'25'25'25'12.4'4
3
.
5
'
3
4
.
3
'35'35'35'10'10'EOFEOFEOFEOF
EOFWETLAND D4 2806 SFLOW FLOOR=918.50(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=918.00(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=918.50(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=920.00(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=919.70(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=919.00(per lot cert, verify)Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............2020The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTAL01" = 80'-0"80'-0"40'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONW1.0WETLAND PLAN............Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRWETLAND LEGEND:CITY OF HUGO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES.PROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSWETLAND CALCULATIONS:WETLAND TO REMAIN (RESTORATION OFPARTIALLY DRAINED SUBP. 4)WETLAND RESTORATION AREA (VEGETATIVERESTORATION OF FARMED WETLANDS SUBP. 5)WETLAND CREATION AREA (SUBP. 7)TOTAL EXISTING WETLAND AREA = 258075 SF (5.92 AC)WETLAND FILL AREAFILL AREA A1=318FILL AREA A2=13167FILL AREA B=13889FILL AREA C=13104FILL AREA D2=20011FILL AREA D3=2077FILL AREA D4=1331FILL AREA G1=10645FILL AREA G2=705FILL AREA X=2224TOTAL FILL AREA=77471 (1.78AC)WETLAND MITIGATION CREDIT ACTIONSNEW CREATED WETLANDS (SUBP. 7)CREATION AREA 1=17984CREATION AREA 2=7659CREATION AREA 3=5860CREATION AREA 4=31576CREATION AREA 5=21652TOTAL ON-SITE CREATION AREA=84731 (1.95 AC)PER SUBP. 7 - 75% CREDIT = 63548 SF (1.46 AC)WETLAND RESTORATION AREA (VEGETATIVE RESTORATION OF FARMED WETLANDS SUBP. 5)RESTORE AREA 1=949RESTORE AREA 2=7959RESTORE AREA 3=3089RESTORE AREA 4=4653RESTORE AREA 5=3897TOTAL WETLAND RESTORATION AREA = 20547 (0.47 AC)PER SUBP. 5 - 50% CREDIT = 10274 SF (0.24 AC)WETLAND RESTORATION AREA (RESTORATION OF PARTIALLY DRAINED WETLANDS SUBP. 4)WETLAND A=63656WETLAND D1=10900WETLAND D2=4231WETLAND D4=2806WETLAND E=67678WETLAND F=16078WETLAND G=16910TOTAL WETLAND RESTORATION AREA = 182259 (4.18AC)PER SUBP. 4 - 50% CREDIT = 91130 SF (2.09 AC)WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER AREAS (SUBP. 2)WETLAND BUFFER PER CREATION AND RESTORED WETLANDS (25' MINIMUM AVERAGE BUFFER WIDTH)CREATION AREA 1 AND RESTORATION AREA 1-3 (CONTIGUOUS)TOTAL WETLAND EDGE LENGTH=895'TOTAL REQUIRED BUFFER AREA IF 25' AVERAGE=895' X 25' = 22,375 SFTOTAL PROVIDED BUFFER AREA=29,160 SFCREATION AREA 2TOTAL PROVIDED WETLAND BUFFER = 4,515 SFCREATION AREA 3TOTAL PROVIDED WETLAND BUFFER = 3,106 SFCREATION AREA 4TOTAL PROVIDED WETLAND BUFFER = 20,898 SFCREATION AREA 5TOTAL PROVIDED WETLAND BUFFER = 24,343 SFRESTORATION AREA 4TOTAL WETLAND EDGE LENGTH=193'TOTAL REQUIRED BUFFER AREA IF 25' AVERAGE=193' X 25' = 4825 SFTOTAL PROVIDED BUFFER AREA=5737 SFRESTORATION AREA 5TOTAL WETLAND EDGE LENGTH=196'TOTAL REQUIRED BUFFER AREA IF 25' AVERAGE=196' X 25' =4900 SFTOTAL PROVIDED BUFFER AREA=6,557 SFTOTAL BUFFER AREA=94316 (2.17AC)PER SUBP. 2 - 25% CREDIT = 23579 SF (0.54 AC)TOTAL FILL = 1.78 ACRESREQUIRED MITIGATION 2:1=3.54 ACON-SITE MITIGATION CREDIT=188,531 SF = 4.33 ACRESOFF SITE CREDITS - NOT USEDWETLAND BUFFER AREA (SUBP. 6)WETLAND FILL AREA
SB-1SB-2SB-5SB-6SB-7SB-3[14] Public Utility Easementper Doc. No. 3172032
N89°40'02"E 1320.77Wire FenceEdge of WoodsGravel DriveEdge of WaterWETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND G16,910 SFWETLAND E67,678 SFWETLAND G1FARMED / DITCH10,645 SFFILLWETLAND G2FARMED705 SFFILLFILLWETLAND D2DITCHED20,011 SFFILLWET CREATION 35860 SFWETLAND D23774 SFLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION100-YR HWL=915.54BASIN 3NWL=915.00OUTLET EL=915.00100-YR HWL=916.41BASIN 4NWL=913.00OUTLET EL=913.00OUTLET EOF=914.50100-YR HWL=914.93WET RESTORE 53897 SFEOFEOFEOFEOF914.50EOFWET CREATION 521,652 SFWETLAND D3DITCH2077 SFFILL2
5
'10'25'25'10'25'32.2'12.1'36.9'25'12.2'25.4'15'25'30.7'33'25'25'25'25'12.4'35'35'EOFEOF
EOF[14] Public Utility Easement
per Doc. No. 3172032 Wire FenceWater TowerEdge of WoodsGravel DriveWETLANDLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONWETLAND X2224 SFFILLWETLAND XLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION6160 SF8884 SF 6160 SF 6160 SF
Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONW1.1WETLAND PLAN SOUTH............01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRMATCH LINE
SB-7SB-8SB-9SB-10SB-11SB-12SB-4[13] Electrical TransmissionEasement per Doc. No. 185981 [15] Encroachment onto Sanitary SewerEasements per Doc. No. 3170523 and[17] Sewer Easement per Doc. No. 287225
S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44
N00°47'52"E 1324.35 Edge of WaterEdge of WaterWETLAND A63,656 SFWETLAND D110,900 SFWETLAND H1555 SF(DITCHED)WETLANDWETLANDWETLANDWETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND B13889 SF(FARMED)FILLWETLAND C13104 SFFARMEDFILLWETLAND 858,590 SFDITCH 7WETLAND D4DITCH1331 SFFILLWETLAND A2FARMED13,167 SFFILLWET CREATION 27659 SFWET CREATION 117,984 SFWET CREATION 431,576 SFLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONBASIN 1NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.64BASIN 2NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.54BASIN 5NWL=911.50OUTLET EL=911.50100-YR HWL=913.46WETLAND A1318 SFFILLWET RESTORE 27959 SFWET RESTORE 1949 SFWET RESTORE 44653 SFWET RESTORE 33089 SFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOF25'10.5'10.5'12.2'25.4'50.6'55.2'25'25'25'25'1
2
.
7
'
10'10'69.6
'25'25'31.7'25'25'25'29.7'15'15'15'15'15'26.2'30.7'12.4'4
3
.
5
'
3
4
.
3
'35'10'10'EOFEOFWETLAND D4 2806 SF
Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONW1.2WETLAND PLAN NORTH............01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR
[13] Electrical TransmissionEasement per Doc. No. 185981[14] Public Utility Easementper Doc. No. 3172032
S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44
N89°40'02"E 1320.77Wire FenceWater TowerEdge of WoodsGravel DriveEdge of WaterEdge of WaterEdge of Water159TH ST N(A Public R/W)WETLAND A63,656 SFWETLAND D110,900 SFWETLAND H1555 SF(DITCHED)WETLANDWETLANDWETLANDWETLANDWETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND G16,910 SFWETLAND E67,678 SFWETLAND B13889 SF(FARMED)FILLWETLAND C13104 SFFARMEDFILLWETLAND 858,590 SFDITCH 7WETLAND 858,590 SFWETLAND 10/1320,749 SFWETLAND D4DITCH1331 SFFILLWETLAND G1FARMED / DITCH10,645 SFFILLWETLAND G2FARMED705 SFFILLWETLAND A2FARMED13,167 SFFILLWETLAND D2DITCHED20,011 SFFILLWETLAND D23774 SFWETLAND X2224 SFFILLWETLAND XWETLAND A1318 SFFILLEOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOF914.50EOFEOFEOFWETLAND D3DITCH2077 SFFILLWETLAND A38093 SFFILLWETLAND A420969 SFFILLWETLAND F13462 SFFILLWETLAND G14080 SFFILLWETLAND E115228 SFFILLWETLAND E213564 SFFILL35'35'35'10'10'EOFEOFEOFEOF
EOFWETLAND D4 2806 SFLOW FLOOR=918.50(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=918.00(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=918.50(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=920.00(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=919.70(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=919.00(per lot cert, verify)Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............2020The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTAL01" = 80'-0"80'-0"40'-0"NREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONW1.3WETLAND PLANALT #1............Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRWETLAND LEGEND:CITY OF HUGO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES.PROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITSWETLAND CALCULATIONS:TOTAL EXISTING WETLAND AREA = 258075 SF (5.92 AC)WETLAND FILL AREAFILL AREA A1=318FILL AREA A2=13167FILL AREA A3=8093FILL AREA A4=20969FILL AREA B=13889FILL AREA C=13104FILL AREA D2=20011FILL AREA D3=2077FILL AREA D4=1331FILL AREA F=13462FILL AREA G=14080FILL AREA E1=15228FILL AREA E2=13564FILL AREA G1=10645FILL AREA G2=705FILL AREA X=2224TOTAL FILL AREA=162867 (3.74AC)WETLAND MITIGATION CREDIT ACTIONSTOTAL FILL = 3.74 ACRESREQUIRED MITIGATION 2:1=7.48 ACON-SITE MITIGATION CREDIT=0OFF SITE CREDITS - 7.48 ACRES PURCHASED PER WETLAND BANKWETLAND FILL AREA
S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44
N89°40'02"E 1320.77WETLAND A63,656 SFWETLAND D110,900 SFWETLAND H1555 SF(DITCHED)WETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND G16,910 SFWETLAND E67,678 SFWETLAND 858,590 SFDITCH 7WETLAND 858,590 SFWETLAND 10/1320,749 SFWETLAND D23774 SFWETLAND XBLOCK
1
B
L
O
C
K
2
B
L
O
C
K
3BLOCK 6BLOCK
5BLOCK 4BLOCK
5BLOCK 7BL
O
C
K
8
BLOC
K
3
B
L
O
C
K
3
BLO
C
K
6
B
L
O
C
K
5
B
L
O
C
K
9
B
L
O
C
K
9
BLO
C
K
9
OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTD(42
,299
SF
)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)OUTLOTE(29
,702
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)OUTLOTA(83
,216
SF
)OUTLOTA(83
,216
SF
)BASIN 1NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.64BASIN 2NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.54BASIN 3NWL=915.00OUTLET EL=915.00100-YR HWL=916.41BASIN 4NWL=913.00OUTLET EL=913.00OUTLET EOF=914.50100-YR HWL=914.93BASIN 5NWL=911.50OUTLET EL=911.50100-YR HWL=913.46EOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOF914.50EOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOF
EOFWE
T
L
A
N
D
D
4
2
8
0
6
S
F
LOW FLOOR=918.50LOW FLOOR=920.00(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=919.70Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202026980KEVIN TEPPENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.0OVERALL SITE PLAN............01" = 80'-0"80'-0"40'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCITY OF HUGO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.SITE PLAN LEGEND:SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE).SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLYPROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANCONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOTYPICAL 2-STORY VILLA HOMESINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION:LOT NUMBERPAD SIZELOT LINED & U EASEMENT10' FRONT & REAR5' SIDE (TYP.)BUILDING SETBACK25' FRONT30' REAR7.5' SIDES/ 15' SIDE ROW29'x70'PADROW LINECURB LINEMINIMUM LOT SIZE:5,400 SFTYPICAL 1-STORY VILLA HOMESINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION:LOT NUMBERPAD SIZELOT LINED & U EASEMENT10' FRONT & REAR5' SIDE (TYP.)BUILDING SETBACK25' FRONT30' REAR5' SIDES/ 15' SIDE ROW40'x70'PADROW LINECURB LINEMINIMUM LOT SIZE:6,750 SFPARK CALCULATIONS:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES.SITE DATA:Gross Site Area (to center of ditch): 32.93 Ac.(Off site right of way area):(1.06 Ac)Existing Wetland Area: 5.92 Ac.Net Developable Area: 27.01 Ac.(Lots & Local Roads, Ponds)Existing Wetland Area:5.92 Ac.Farmed/ Cropped /DitchedWetland Removed:1.77 Ac.Non-Farmed/Ditched Wetland Removed:0.00 Ac.Wetland Saved:4.15 Ac. (70%)*Zoning:Existing Zoning: FUS ( Future Urban Service)2040 Land Use Guide:MDR (Medium Density Residential)(3-6 u/a)Proposed Zoning/ Land Use:PUD (MDR)DNR Shoreland Management Ordinance: 9.53 ac300' from ditchNo touch Shoreland Impact Zone53' adj. to ditch (70% of 75')Min. Lot width DNR PUD: 50'Structure setback from ditch: 50' f/ OHWMin. Lot size: noneMax. hardcover 25% (entire 300')Building FFE: 3' above OHWMin. Openspace DNR PUD:50% (4.77 ac.)Proposed Public Openspace DNR PUD:58% (5.13 ac)Private Lots (50'x135')/ ROW: 4.40 ac.Overall Residential Units:87 lots (3.22 u/a)Villa 1-story SF lots 50' x 135'/140' min.:45 lotsVilla 2-story SF lots 44' x 135'/140' min.:42 lotsSetbacks:50' lots25' front (variable, 25' minimum)30' rear 5' side/ 15' side row44' lots25' front (variable, 25' minimum)30' rear 7.5' side/ 15' side row
[14] Public Utility Easementper Doc. No. 3172032
N89°40'02"E 1320.77Wire FenceEdge of WoodsGravel DriveEdge of WaterOUTLOT I300' SHO
R
E
L
A
N
D
L
I
N
E
53' PRES
E
R
V
E
D
A
R
E
A POND60'60'SURMOUNTABLECURB & GUTTER, TYP.R60'POND8' BITUMINOUSTRAIL (TYP.)5' CONCRETESIDEWALK (TYP.)60'VARIABLE FRONTSETBACK (25' MINIMUM)R46'R
3
4
'WETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND G16,910 SFWETLAND E67,678 SFWETLAND D23774 SF40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x60'PAD29'x70'PAD 29'x70'PAD 29'x70'PAD 29'x70'PAD 29'x70'PAD 29'x70'PAD 29'x70'PAD29'x70'PAD29'x70'PAD29'x70'PAD29'x70
'PAD29'x70
'PAD29'x70
'PAD29'x70'PAD29'x70'PAD29'x70'PAD29'x70'PAD29'x70'PAD29'x70'
PAD
29'x70'
PAD
29'x70'
PAD
40'x70'PAD
40'x70
'PAD40'x60'PAD40'x70'PAD4
0
'
x
7
0
'PAD40'x
7
0
'
PAD
40'x70'
PAD 40'x70'PAD4
0
'
x
7
0
'
P
A
D
4
0
'
x
7
0
'
P
A
D
40'x70
'PAD40'x70
'PAD40'x70'
PAD
40'x70'
PAD
40'x70'
PAD
40'x70'
PAD
40'x70'PAD40'x70'PADR20'30'5' CONCRETESIDEWALK (TYP.)SURMOUNTABLECURB & GUTTER, TYP.8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL(TYP.)STREET LIGHT (TYP.)STREET LIGHT (TYP.)PED RAMP, SEEDETAILS, TYP.D&U ESMT. (TYP.)D&U ESMT. (TYP.)D&U ESMT.(TYP.)D&UESMT.(TYP.)D&U ESMT.(TYP.)LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIOND&UESMT.(TYP.)BLOCK 1
B
L
O
C
K
2
BLOCK 8
B
L
O
C
K
3
BLOCK 9
B
L
O
C
K
9
OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTE(29,702 SF)
6160 SF
6140
SF
6173 SF 6346 SF 6433 SF 6356 SF 6871 SF 6681 SF 6197 SF 6166 SF 6177 SF
6185
SF
6196
SF
10197
SF
7020 SF 7020 SF
6160 SF8884 SF11896 SF7002 SF7051 SF
7361 SF 9541 SF 12251 SF7002 SF6160 SF 6160 SF 6160 SF 6172 SF 6180 SF
6160 SF
R200'R
2
0
'R250'R325'30'R125' 8809 SF 9043 SF
10061 SF 7058 SF8506 SF8218 SFOUTLOTA(83
,216
SF
)
9638 SF7762 SF7002 SF10063 SF7328 SF7369 SF
71
7
5
S
F
6
6
0
0
S
F
7532
SFOUTLOTA(83,216 SF)100-YR HWL=915.54BASIN 3NWL=915.00OUTLET EL=915.00100-YR HWL=916.41BASIN 4NWL=913.00OUTLET EL=913.00OUTLET EOF=914.50100-YR HWL=914.93EOFEOFEOFEOF914.50EOF35'35'35' DITCHEASEMENT35' DITCHEASEMENTR300'PASSIVE MOWEDTRAILFUTURE ACCESSDRIVEWAY BY CITYEOFEOF
EOFVALLEY GUTTER[14] Public Utility Easement
per Doc. No. 3172032 Wire FenceWater TowerEdge of WoodsGravel DriveCITY OFHUGOWETLAND8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL(TYP.)D&UESMT.(TYP.)LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONR140'30'60'SURMOUNTABLECURB & GUTTER, TYP.WETLAND XLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION50.5'6160 SF8884 SF 6160 SF 6160 SFR300'R300'FUTURE ACCESSDRIVEWAY BY CITYFUTURETRAIL BYOTHERSCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202026980KEVIN TEPPENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.1SITE PLAN............01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCITY OF HUGO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.SITE PLAN LEGEND:SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE).SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLYPROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANCONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOTYPICAL 2-STORY VILLA HOMESINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION:LOT NUMBERPAD SIZELOT LINED & U EASEMENT10' FRONT & REAR5' SIDE (TYP.)BUILDING SETBACK25' FRONT30' REAR7.5' SIDES/ 15' SIDE ROW29'x70'PADROW LINECURB LINEMINIMUM LOT SIZE:5,400 SFTYPICAL 1-STORY VILLA HOMESINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION:LOT NUMBERPAD SIZELOT LINED & U EASEMENT10' FRONT & REAR5' SIDE (TYP.)BUILDING SETBACK25' FRONT30' REAR5' SIDES/ 15' SIDE ROW40'x70'PADROW LINECURB LINEMINIMUM LOT SIZE:6,750 SFPARK CALCULATIONS:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES.MATCH LINE
MATCH LINE
[13] Electrical TransmissionEasement per Doc. No. 185981 [15] Encroachment onto Sanitary SewerEasements per Doc. No. 3170523 and[17] Sewer Easement per Doc. No. 287225
S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44
N00°47'52"E 1324.35 Edge of WaterEdge of Water53'
P
R
E
S
E
R
V
E
D
A
R
E
APONDPONDWETLAND A63,656 SFWETLAND D110,900 SFWETLAND H1555 SF(DITCHED)60
'SURMOUNTABLECURB & GUTTER, TYP.TEMP. SAC.TEMP. SAC.8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL(TYP.)8' BIT.TRAIL (TYP.)POND30'30'D&U EASEMENT (TYP.)30
0
'
S
H
O
R
E
L
A
N
D
L
I
N
E60'30'VARIABLE FRONTSETBACK (25' MINIMUM)VARIABLE FRONTSETBACK (25' MINIMUM)R20'R150'R46'R60'R44'R44'R34'WETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND 858,590 SFDITCH 729'x70'PAD 29'x70'PAD29'x70'PAD29'x70'PAD29'x70
'PAD29'x70
'PAD29'x70
'PAD29'x70
'PAD29'x70'
PAD
29'x70'
PAD 29'x70'
PAD 29'x70'
PAD
29'x70'
PAD29'x70'
PAD
29'x70'PAD 29'x70'PAD 29'x70'PAD 29'x70'PAD 29'x70'PAD 29'x70'PAD 29'x70'PAD 29'x70'PAD29'x70'PAD29'x70'
PAD
29'x70'
PAD
40'x70'
PAD
40'x70'
PAD
40'x70'
PAD
40'x70'
PAD
40'x70'
PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'
PAD
40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x70'PAD40'x60'PAD40'x70'PAD29'x70'PAD29'x70'PAD29'x70'PAD30'60'5' CONCRETESIDEWALK (TYP.)8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL(TYP.)8' BIT TRAIL (TYP.)STREETLIGHT (TYP.)STREET LIGHT (TYP.)STREETLIGHT (TYP.)PED RAMP, SEEDETAILS, TYP.PED RAMP, SEEDETAILS, TYP.D&U ESMT. (TYP.)D&U ESMT. (TYP.)D&U ESMT. (TYP.)D&U ESMT. (TYP.)D&U ESMT. (TYP.)LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIOND&UESMT.(TYP.)B
L
O
C
K
3BLOCK 6BLOCK 5BLOCK 4BLOCK 5BLOCK 7BLOC
K
3
BLO
C
K
6
BLOCK 5
B
L
O
C
K
9
BLO
C
K
9 OUTLOTD(42,299 SF)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)17637 SF12378 SF7482 SF6494 SF6540 SF6758 SF 6545 SF7293 SF5500 SF5500 SF21249 SF 15335 SF10062 SF 10675 SF 10123 SF8384 SF 7042 SF
7232 S
F
760
6
S
F
7217 SF 7938 SF
6375 SF
6160 SF
6140
SF
6173
SF
6166
SF
6177
SF
6185
SF
6196
SF
10197
SF
7020 SF 7020 SF 7907 SF6180 SF
6160 SF 6160 SF 6160 SF 6160 SF
7020 SF 7020 SF
OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)D&U ESMT. (TYP.)8264 SF9500 SFR100'
R10
0
'R250'R100'R20'R20'60'60.1'SURMOUNTABLECURB & GUTTER, TYP.R125'R300'11211 SF 81
1
9
S
F
81
5
9
S
F
86
9
4
S
F
9667 SF
10119 SF9043 SF
7910 SF 12723 SF10174 SFBASIN 1NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.64BASIN 2NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.54BASIN 5NWL=911.50OUTLET EL=911.50100-YR HWL=913.46EOFEOFEOFEOFEOF35'35' DITCHEASEMENT35' DITCHEASEMENT 7020 SF 7029 SF
PASSIVE MOWEDTRAILR30'10'R47'10'R30'10'10'R47'PASSIVE MOWEDTRAILEOFEOFWETLAND D4 2806 SFFUTURETRAIL BYOTHERSCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202026980KEVIN TEPPENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.2SITE PLAN............01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCITY OF HUGO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES.SITE PLAN LEGEND:SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE).SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED.HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGNNP = NO PARKING FIRE LANEST = STOPCP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLYPROPERTY LINECURB AND GUTTER-SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUTGUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE-SEE PLANCONSTRUCTION LIMITSTOTYPICAL 2-STORY VILLA HOMESINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION:LOT NUMBERPAD SIZELOT LINED & U EASEMENT10' FRONT & REAR5' SIDE (TYP.)BUILDING SETBACK25' FRONT30' REAR7.5' SIDES/ 15' SIDE ROW29'x70'PADROW LINECURB LINEMINIMUM LOT SIZE:5,400 SFTYPICAL 1-STORY VILLA HOMESINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION:LOT NUMBERPAD SIZELOT LINED & U EASEMENT10' FRONT & REAR5' SIDE (TYP.)BUILDING SETBACK25' FRONT30' REAR5' SIDES/ 15' SIDE ROW40'x70'PADROW LINECURB LINEMINIMUM LOT SIZE:6,750 SFPARK CALCULATIONS:1.RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES.
S89°29'46"W 1319.6950'LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONB
L
O
C
K
3BLOCK 6BLOCK 5BLOCK 4BLOCK 5BLOCK 6BLOCK 5OUTLOTD OUTLOTC(113,813 SF)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTC(113,813 SF)BASIN 1NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.64EOFEOFEOFEOF50'50'50' UTILITYEASEMENT50' UTILITYEASEMENT50' UTILITYEASEMENTEOF25'25'25'25'Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202026980KEVIN TEPPENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC2.3OFF SITE EASEMENTEXHIBIT............01" = 100'-0"100'-0"50'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRSITE PLAN LEGEND:PROPERTY LINECONSTRUCTION LIMITS
SB-1SB-2SB-5SB-6SB-7SB-3SB-8SB-9SB-10SB-11SB-12SB-4S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44
N89°40'02"E 1320.77WETLAND A63,656 SFWETLAND D110,900 SFWETLAND H1555 SF(DITCHED)WETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND G16,910 SFWETLAND E67,678 SFWETLAND 858,590 SFDITCH 7WETLAND 858,590 SFWETLAND 10/1320,749 SFWETLAND D23774 SFLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONWETLAND XLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONBLOCK
1
B
L
O
C
K
2
B
L
O
C
K
3BLOCK 6BLOCK
5BLOCK 4BLOCK
5BLOCK 7BL
O
C
K
8
BLOC
K
3
B
L
O
C
K
3
BLO
C
K
6
B
L
O
C
K
5
B
L
O
C
K
9
B
L
O
C
K
9
BLO
C
K
9
OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTD(42
,299
SF
)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)OUTLOTE(29
,702
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)OUTLOTA(83
,216
SF
)OUTLOTA(83
,216
SF
)BASIN 1NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.64BASIN 2NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.54BASIN 3NWL=915.00OUTLET EL=915.00100-YR HWL=916.41BASIN 4NWL=913.00OUTLET EL=913.00OUTLET EOF=914.50100-YR HWL=914.93BASIN 5NWL=911.50OUTLET EL=911.50100-YR HWL=913.46EOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOF914.50EOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOF
EOFWE
T
L
A
N
D
D
4
2
8
0
6
S
FLOW FLOOR=918.50(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=918.00(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=918.50(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=920.00(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=919.70(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=919.00(per lot cert, verify)Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.0OVERALLGRADING PLAN............01" = 80'-0"80'-0"40'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIROR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2.SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES.3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITEPREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTSOF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONSWITH THE SOILS ENGINEER.4.GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTIONDISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY.5.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIROR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.6.PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW-LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7.GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSSSLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8.PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPESIN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:19.PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' INHEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGSSHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.10.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATIONOF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINALFIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOILAND SODDING ACTIVITIES.11.IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOILMATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THESITE.12.EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREASDESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITEAS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS,ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BEESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO AMINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES.13.FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OFGRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIEDTOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, ORBETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTEDFROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOMERUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREASDISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINALCONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK.14.PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/ORPARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSSWEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BECOMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICHSECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BECOMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCURWITHIN 10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS.15. TOLERANCES15.1.THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE,OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE.15.2.THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENTIS MADE.15.3.AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THEREQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER.15.4.TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS.16.MAINTENANCE16.1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREAFREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS.16.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TOSPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD,ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED.16.3.WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS ORADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIREDDENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION.GENERAL GRADING NOTES:1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSCITY OF HUGO GRADING NOTES:1.ALL PONDS SHALL BE CLAY LINED.SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5EROSION CONTROL NOTES:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52TOSPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTINGGRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTSRICE CREEK WATERSHED NOTES:1.ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE IN VGVD29. TO CONVERT TONAVD88 ADD 0.15'.WETLAND
SB-1SB-2SB-5SB-6SB-7SB-3[14] Public Utility Easementper Doc. No. 3172032
N89°40'02"E 1320.77Wire FenceEdge of WoodsGravel DriveEdge of WaterWETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND G16,910 SFWETLAND E67,678 SFWETLAND D23774 SFLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONBLOCK 1
B
L
O
C
K
2
BLOCK 8
B
L
O
C
K
3
BLOCK 9
B
L
O
C
K
9
OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTE(29,702 SF)OUTLOTA(83
,216
SF
)OUTLOTA(83,216 SF)100-YR HWL=915.54BASIN 3NWL=915.00OUTLET EL=915.00100-YR HWL=916.41BASIN 4NWL=913.00OUTLET EL=913.00OUTLET EOF=914.50100-YR HWL=914.93EOFEOFEOFEOF914.50EOF35'35'EOFEOF
EOF[14] Public Utility Easement
per Doc. No. 3172032 Wire FenceWater TowerEdge of WoodsGravel DriveLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONWETLAND XLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION6160 SF8884 SF 6160 SF 6160 SF
Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.1GRADING PLAN............1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallREX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52TOSPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTINGGRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTSMATCH LINE
WETLAND
SB-7SB-8SB-9SB-10SB-11SB-12SB-4[13] Electrical TransmissionEasement per Doc. No. 185981 [15] Encroachment onto Sanitary SewerEasements per Doc. No. 3170523 and[17] Sewer Easement per Doc. No. 287225
S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44
N00°47'52"E 1324.35 Edge of WaterEdge of WaterWETLAND A63,656 SFWETLAND D110,900 SFWETLAND H1555 SF(DITCHED)WETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND 858,590 SFDITCH 7LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONB
L
O
C
K
3BLOCK 6BLOCK 5BLOCK 4BLOCK 5BLOCK 7BLOC
K
3
BLO
C
K
6
BLOCK 5
B
L
O
C
K
9
BLO
C
K
9 OUTLOTD(42,299 SF)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)BASIN 1NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.64BASIN 2NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.54BASIN 5NWL=911.50OUTLET EL=911.50100-YR HWL=913.46EOFEOFEOFEOFEOF35'10'10'EOFEOFWETLAND D4 2806 SF
Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC3.2GRADING PLAN............01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALGRADING PLAN LEGEND:SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTERSPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURBSPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRSEX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINEUNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED)CURB AND GUTTER (T.O = TIP OUT)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWEOF=1135.52TOSPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTINGGRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTSWETLAND
S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44
N89°40'02"E 1320.77WETLAND A63,656 SFWETLAND D110,900 SFWETLAND H1555 SF(DITCHED)WETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND G16,910 SFWETLAND E67,678 SFWETLAND 858,590 SFDITCH 7WETLAND 858,590 SFWETLAND 10/1320,749 SFWETLAND D23774 SFLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONWETLAND XLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONBLOCK
1
B
L
O
C
K
2
B
L
O
C
K
3BLOCK 6BLOCK
5BLOCK 4BLOCK
5BLOCK 7BL
O
C
K
8
BLOC
K
3
B
L
O
C
K
3
BLO
C
K
6
B
L
O
C
K
5
B
L
O
C
K
9
B
L
O
C
K
9
BLO
C
K
9
OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTD(42
,299
SF
)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)OUTLOTE(29
,702
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)OUTLOTA(83
,216
SF
)OUTLOTA(83
,216
SF
)BASIN 1NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.64BASIN 2NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.54BASIN 3NWL=915.00OUTLET EL=915.00100-YR HWL=916.41BASIN 4NWL=913.00OUTLET EL=913.00OUTLET EOF=914.50100-YR HWL=914.93BASIN 5NWL=911.50OUTLET EL=911.50100-YR HWL=913.46EOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOF914.50EOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOF
EOFWE
T
L
A
N
D
D
4
2
8
0
6
S
FLOW FLOOR=918.50(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=918.00(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=918.50(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=920.00(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=919.70(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=919.00(per lot cert, verify)Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.0OVERALLUTILITY PLAN............01" = 80'-0"80'-0"40'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRUTILITY LEGEND:CATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAPGENERAL UTILITY NOTES:1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONECALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES ANDTOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELYNOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS.4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER ANDSTORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OFMINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THEPROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THEDIRECTION OF THE OWNER.6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLAREDEND SECTION.10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THECONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES.COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS.11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCHBASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ONTHIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL.14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICALSEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATIONIS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS ANDCOORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICALDRAWINGS.19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITHADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF.20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THECITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BEPROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEMINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THISSHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS ASNEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURESSHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHEREREQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEINGRESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES.COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACTINSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMITTHESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK.25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT.APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TOMANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES.26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING ORWATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714,SECTION 1109.0.CITY OF HUGO UTILITY NOTES:1.CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE EXISTING UTILITY INFRASTRUCTUREALONG EXISTING PORTIONS OF FINALE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WHO MAYBE INVOLVED. RELOCATION, REMOVAL OR PROTECTION OF EXISTING UTILITIESMUST BE AGREED UPON AND COORDINATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2.ACCESS TO KEYSTONE PLACE (ADJACENT PROPERTY) SHALL BE MAINTAINEDDURING UTILITY CONNECTIONS. COORDINATE PLAN WITH CITY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.3.CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 4" OF RIGID INSULATION PER DETAILS ON ALLSANITARY SEWER PIPES WITH LESS THAN 8' OF COVER.RCWD UTILITY NOTES:1.DEVELOPER MUST PROVIDE AN AS-BUILT SURVEY OF THE INVERT ELEVATIONSOF ALL CULVERTS EXTENDING INTO JD3 (DRAINAGE DITCH).1.1.OS 61, FES 60
[14] Public Utility Easementper Doc. No. 3172032
N89°40'02"E 1320.77Wire FenceEdge of WoodsGravel DriveWETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND G16,910 SFWETLAND E67,678 SFWETLAND D23774 SFLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONBLOCK 1
B
L
O
C
K
2
BLOCK 8
B
L
O
C
K
3
BLOCK 9
B
L
O
C
K
9
OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTE(29,702 SF)OUTLOTA(83
,216
SF
)OUTLOTA(83,216 SF)100-YR HWL=915.54BASIN 3NWL=915.00OUTLET EL=915.00100-YR HWL=916.41BASIN 4NWL=913.00OUTLET EL=913.00OUTLET EOF=914.50100-YR HWL=914.93EOFEOFEOFEOF914.50EOF35'35'EOFEOF
EOFEXIST. 42" MET COUNCILSANITARY SEWERHYD & GV,TYP.HYD &GV,TYP.HYD & GV,TYP.24"WATERMAIN8" DIPWATERMAIN420 LF 8"PVC SDR35SAN @ 0.40%SAN MH 6RE=915.70IE(N)=907.25IE(W/S)=907.35177 LF 8"PVC SDR35SAN @ 0.40%SAN MH 7RE=917.55IE(NE)=907.82IE(SW)=907.92243 LF 8"PVC SDR35SAN @ 0.40%SAN MH 8RE=918.20IE(NE)=908.89SAN MH 31RE=917.80IE(N)=909.00IE(W)=909.10114 LF 8"PVC SDR35SAN @ 0.40%SAN MH 32RE=918.40IE(E)=909.56399 LF 8"PVC SDR35SAN @ 0.40%SAN MH 30RE=919.00IE(NE)=907.30IE(S)=907.40241 LF 8"PVC SDR35SAN @ 0.40%SAN MH 6ARE=916.50IE(N)=908.31CONNECT TOEXISTING 24" DIPWATERMAINEX 16" DIPWATERMAIN8" DIPWATERMAIN24" DIPWATERMAINHYD &GV,TYP.22.5° BEND90° BEND11.25° BEND22.5° BEND22.5° BEND90° BEND24X24X8 TEECONNECTION(1)45° BEND(1)11.5° BEND90° BEND90° BEND4" PVC SAN. (TYP)1" PVC WAT. (TYP)4" PVC SAN. (TYP)1" PVC WAT. (TYP)24X24X8 TEECONNECTION4" PVC SAN. (TYP)1" PVC WAT. (TYP)[14] Public Utility Easement
per Doc. No. 3172032Water TowerGravel DriveLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONEXIST. 42" MET COUNCIL
SANITARY SEWER
HYD & GV,TYP.SAN MH 32RE=918.40IE(E)=909.56CONNECT TOEXISTING 24" DIPWATERMAINEX 16" DIPWATERMAINEX 24" DIPWATERMAINEX 8" PVC SANSERVICEEX SAN MH 46RE=919.70EX IE(N/S)=905.3390° BENDCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.1UTILITY PLAN(SAN WATER)............UTILITY LEGEND:01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAPGENERAL UTILITY NOTES:1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONECALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES ANDTOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELYNOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS.4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER ANDSTORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OFMINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THEPROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THEDIRECTION OF THE OWNER.6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLAREDEND SECTION.10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THECONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES.COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS.11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCHBASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ONTHIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL.14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICALSEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATIONIS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS ANDCOORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICALDRAWINGS.19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITHADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF.20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THECITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BEPROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEMINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THISSHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS ASNEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURESSHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHEREREQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEINGRESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES.COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACTINSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMITTHESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK.25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT.APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TOMANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES.26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING ORWATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714,SECTION 1109.0.MATCH LINE
CITY OF HUGO UTILITY NOTES:1.CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE EXISTING UTILITY INFRASTRUCTUREALONG EXISTING PORTIONS OF FINALE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WHO MAYBE INVOLVED. RELOCATION, REMOVAL OR PROTECTION OF EXISTING UTILITIESMUST BE AGREED UPON AND COORDINATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2.ACCESS TO KEYSTONE PLACE (ADJACENT PROPERTY) SHALL BE MAINTAINEDDURING UTILITY CONNECTIONS. COORDINATE PLAN WITH CITY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.3.CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 4" OF RIGID INSULATION PER DETAILS ON ALLSANITARY SEWER PIPES WITH LESS THAN 8' OF COVER.RCWD UTILITY NOTES:1.DEVELOPER MUST PROVIDE AN AS-BUILT SURVEY OF THE INVERT ELEVATIONSOF ALL CULVERTS EXTENDING INTO JD3 (DRAINAGE DITCH).1.1.OS 61, FES 60
[13] Electrical TransmissionEasement per Doc. No. 185981 [15] Encroachment onto Sanitary SewerEasements per Doc. No. 3170523 and[17] Sewer Easement per Doc. No. 287225
S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44
Edge of WaterEdge of WaterWETLAND A63,656 SFWETLAND D110,900 SFWETLAND H1555 SF(DITCHED)WETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND 858,590 SFDITCH 7LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONB
L
O
C
K
3BLOCK 6BLOCK 5BLOCK 4BLOCK 5BLOCK 7BLOC
K
3
BLO
C
K
6
BLOCK 5
B
L
O
C
K
9
BLO
C
K
9 OUTLOTD(42,299 SF)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)BASIN 1NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.64BASIN 2NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.54BASIN 5NWL=911.50OUTLET EL=911.50100-YR HWL=913.46EOFEOFEOFEOFEOF35'10'10'EOFEOFWETLAND D4 2806 SF EXIST. 42" MET COUNCIL SANITARY SEWER
HYD & GV,TYP.HYD & GV,TYP.HYD & GV,TYP.HYD & GV,TYP.24" WATERMAIN8" DIPWATERMAIN24" DIPWATERMAIN8" DIPWATERMAINPROP MCES MANHOLEPROP RE=917.00EX. 42" IE (N/S)=897.96PROP 36" IE (E)=898.36EX MCES MANHOLE #57EX RE=919.04EX. 42" IE (N/S)=897.64EXISTING 316 LF 42" RCPMCES INTERCEPTOR @ 0.10%460 LF 36" PVC F679SANITARY TRUNKSEWER @ 0.10%PROP TRUNK MANHOLE APROP RE=916.50PROP 36" IE (E/W)=898.82PROP 8" IE (S)=900.69350 LF 36" PVC F679SANITARY TRUNKSEWER @ 0.10%PROP TRUNK MANHOLE BPROP RE=914.50PROP 36" IE (E/W)=899.1725' D&U EASEMENTOBTAIN FROMNEIGHBORINGPROPERTYEX MCES MANHOLE #58EX RE=916.37EX. 42" IE (N/S)=898.14EXISTING 179 LF 42" RCPMCES INTERCEPTOR @ 0.10%494 LF 36" PVC F679SANITARY TRUNKSEWER @ 0.10%HYD & GV, TYP.SAN MH 1RE=916.40IE(N)=901.26IE(SE)=901.36146 LF 8"PVC SDR26SAN @ 0.40%SAN MH 2RE=917.30IE(NW)=902.92IE(SE)=903.02142 LF 8"PVC SDR26SAN @ 0.40%116 LF 8"PVC SDR26SAN @ 0.40%SAN MH 3RE=916.50IE(NW)=903.48IE(S)=903.58IE(NE)=905.58143 LF 8"PVC SDR35SAN @ 0.40%SAN MH 5RE=915.50IE(N)=904.47IE(S/W)=904.57420 LF 8"PVC SDR35SAN @ 0.40%127 LF 8"PVC SDR35SAN @ 0.40%SAN MH 20RE=917.00IE(E)=905.08IE(SW)=905.18336 LF 8"PVC SDR35SAN @ 0.40%SAN MH 21RE=918.00IE(NE)=906.52IE(SW/NW)=906.62267 LF 8"PVC SDR35SAN @ 0.40%SAN MH 22RE=918.25IE(N)=907.79IE(SE)=907.69197 LF 8"PVC SDR35SAN @ 0.40%SAN MH 23RE=918.20IE(S)=908.58SAN MH 30169 LF 8"PVC SDR35SAN @ 0.40%199 LF 8"PVC SDR35SAN @ 0.40%SAN MH 3ARE=915.50IE(SW)=906.388" DIPWATERMAIN24" DIPWATERMAINHYD & GV,TYP.(1)45° BEND(1)11.5° BEND8X8X8 TEECONNECTION22.5° BEND90° BEND(1)22.5° BEND(1)11.5° BEND11.25° BEND11.25° BEND(1)45° BEND(1)22.5° BEND22.5° BEND11.25° BENDSAN MH 4RE=915.50IE(N)=904.05IE(S/W)=904.15118 LF 8"PVC SDR35SAN @ 0.40%90° BEND90° BEND90° BEND90° BEND4" PVC SAN. (TYP)24X24X8 TEECONNECTION24X24X8 TEECONNECTION4" PVC SAN. (TYP)1" PVC WAT. (TYP)24x24x12 TEE12" DIPWATERMAIN12" PLUG36" PLUGCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.2UTILITY PLAN(SAN WATER)............UTILITY LEGEND:01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAPCITY OF HUGO UTILITY NOTES:1.CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE EXISTING UTILITY INFRASTRUCTUREALONG EXISTING PORTIONS OF FINALE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WHO MAYBE INVOLVED. RELOCATION, REMOVAL OR PROTECTION OF EXISTING UTILITIESMUST BE AGREED UPON AND COORDINATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2.ACCESS TO KEYSTONE PLACE (ADJACENT PROPERTY) SHALL BE MAINTAINEDDURING UTILITY CONNECTIONS. COORDINATE PLAN WITH CITY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.3.CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 4" OF RIGID INSULATION PER DETAILS ON ALLSANITARY SEWER PIPES WITH LESS THAN 8' OF COVER.RCWD UTILITY NOTES:1.DEVELOPER MUST PROVIDE AN AS-BUILT SURVEY OF THE INVERT ELEVATIONSOF ALL CULVERTS EXTENDING INTO JD3 (DRAINAGE DITCH).1.1.OS 61, FES 60
[14] Public Utility Easementper Doc. No. 3172032
N89°40'02"E 1320.77Wire FenceEdge of WoodsGravel DriveEdge of WaterWETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND G16,910 SFWETLAND E67,678 SFWETLAND D23774 SFLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTION100-YR HWL=915.54BASIN 3NWL=915.00OUTLET EL=915.00100-YR HWL=916.41BASIN 4NWL=913.00OUTLET EL=913.00OUTLET EOF=914.50100-YR HWL=914.93EOFEOFEOFEOF914.50EOF35'35'EOFEOF
EOFFES1IE=908.77OS2RE=913.40OE=911.50(WEIR SEE DETAIL)IE=909.0045 LF 18" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%FES10IE=909.65STMH11RE=913.50IE=909.89SUMP IE=905.89CBMH12RE=915.26IE(E/S)=911.34IE(NW)=911.54CB12ARE=915.17IE=912.04CBMH13RE=915.55IE=912.14CBMH14RE=915.55IE(E)=912.28IE(W)=912.60FES15IE=913.00FES80IE=915.00CBMH81RE=917.54IE=915.05SUMPIE=911.05CB82RE=917.54IE=915.19FES90IE=913.86CBMH91RE=917.07IE=914.13SUMPIE=910.13CB92RE=917.07IE=914.27FES100(2)IE=914.70FES101(2)IE=915.00145 LF 18" RCPSTORM @ 1.00%24 LF 18" RCPSTORM @ 1.00%33 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 1.50%160 LF 15" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%28 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%20 LF 8" PVC STORM@2.00%(DOUBLE)77 LF 18" RCPSTORM @ 0.40%28 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%27 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 1.00%28 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%10 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%RIPRAP EOFIE=913.50CB73RE=917.60IE=914.474" PERFORATEDPVC DRAIN TILE,TYP.4" PERFORATEDPVC DRAIN TILE,TYP.4" PERFORATEDPVC DRAIN TILE,TYP.[14] Public Utility Easement
per Doc. No. 3172032 Wire FenceWater TowerEdge of WoodsGravel DriveLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONWETLAND XLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONHYD & GV,TYP.CONNECT TOEXISTING 24" DIPWATERMAINEX 16" DIPWATERMAINEX 24" DIPWATERMAINEX 8" PVC SANSERVICE90° BENDCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.3UTILITY PLAN(STORM)............UTILITY LEGEND:01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAPGENERAL UTILITY NOTES:1.ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONECALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT AREDAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT.3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES ANDTOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELYNOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS.4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARDSPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER ANDSTORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OFMINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THEPROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE-USED OR PLACED AT THEDIRECTION OF THE OWNER.6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLAREDEND SECTION.10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THECONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES.COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS.11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCHBASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ONTHIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED.13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS.HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL.14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISENOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICALSEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL.15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATIONIS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS ANDCOORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.17.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE-DRILLED.18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICALDRAWINGS.19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITHADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF.20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THECITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BEPROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THEMINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THISSHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS ASNEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURESSHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY.21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHEREREQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEINGRESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING.22. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES.23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES.COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACTINSTALLATION OF UTILITIES.24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS-BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMITTHESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK.25.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT.APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TOMANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES.26.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING ORWATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714,SECTION 1109.0.27.FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINTCATCH BASINS 50' IN EACH DIRECTION. SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOW POINT DRAIN TILEPER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS.MATCH LINE
CITY OF HUGO UTILITY NOTES:1.CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE EXISTING UTILITY INFRASTRUCTUREALONG EXISTING PORTIONS OF FINALE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WHO MAYBE INVOLVED. RELOCATION, REMOVAL OR PROTECTION OF EXISTING UTILITIESMUST BE AGREED UPON AND COORDINATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2.ACCESS TO KEYSTONE PLACE (ADJACENT PROPERTY) SHALL BE MAINTAINEDDURING UTILITY CONNECTIONS. COORDINATE PLAN WITH CITY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.3.CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 4" OF RIGID INSULATION PER DETAILS ON ALLSANITARY SEWER PIPES WITH LESS THAN 8' OF COVER.RCWD UTILITY NOTES:1.DEVELOPER MUST PROVIDE AN AS-BUILT SURVEY OF THE INVERT ELEVATIONSOF ALL CULVERTS EXTENDING INTO JD3 (DRAINAGE DITCH).1.1.OS 61, FES 60
[13] Electrical TransmissionEasement per Doc. No. 185981 [15] Encroachment onto Sanitary SewerEasements per Doc. No. 3170523 and[17] Sewer Easement per Doc. No. 287225
S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44
Edge of WaterEdge of WaterWETLAND A63,656 SFWETLAND D110,900 SFWETLAND H1555 SF(DITCHED)WETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND 858,590 SFDITCH 7LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONBASIN 1NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.64BASIN 2NWL=914.50OUTLET EL=914.50100-YR HWL=915.54BASIN 5NWL=911.50OUTLET EL=911.50100-YR HWL=913.46EOFEOFEOFEOFEOF35'EOFEOFWETLAND D4 2806 SF
FES25IE=914.50STMH11RE=913.50IE=909.89SUMP IE=905.89FES20IE=910.50STMH21RE=916.00IE E=911.23IE NW=911.43SUMP IE=907.23(2) CBMH22RE=914.94IE=911.55CBMH23RE=914.94IE SW/E=911.69IE S=911.89FES30IE=911.50STMH31RE=913.50IE=911.55SUMP IE=907.55CBMH32RE=914.84IE=912.40CBMH33RE=914.85IE=912.54FES50IE=913.50CBMH51RE=917.02IE=913.58IE SUMP=909.59CB52RE=917.14IE=913.72FES60IE=914.00FES61IE=914.50FES70IE=914.00CBMH 71RE=917.07IE=914.08SUMP IE=910.08CBMH72RE=917.07IE=914.2228 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%17 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%79 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 0.63%128 LF 15" RCPSTORM @ 2.07%28 LF 15" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%23 LF 18" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%146 LF 18" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%171 LF 15" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%10 LF 15" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%28 LF 15" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%29 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%16 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%CBMH34RE=916.27IE=913.34CB35RE=916.27IE=913.4828 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%322 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 0.25%CB23ARE=915.29IE=912.2572 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%CB73RE=917.60IE=914.4750 LF 12" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%CBMH24RE=915.74IE=911.8532 LF 15" RCPSTORM @ 0.50%4" PERFORATEDPVC DRAIN TILE,TYP.4" PERFORATEDPVC DRAIN TILE,Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC4.4UTILITY PLAN(STORM)............UTILITY LEGEND:01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRCATCH BASINGATE VALVE AND VALVE BOXSANITARY SEWERSTORM SEWERWATER MAINPROPOSED FIRE HYDRANTMANHOLEFES AND RIP RAPCITY OF HUGO UTILITY NOTES:1.CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE EXISTING UTILITY INFRASTRUCTUREALONG EXISTING PORTIONS OF FINALE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WHO MAYBE INVOLVED. RELOCATION, REMOVAL OR PROTECTION OF EXISTING UTILITIESMUST BE AGREED UPON AND COORDINATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION.2.ACCESS TO KEYSTONE PLACE (ADJACENT PROPERTY) SHALL BE MAINTAINEDDURING UTILITY CONNECTIONS. COORDINATE PLAN WITH CITY PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION.3.CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 4" OF RIGID INSULATION PER DETAILS ON ALLSANITARY SEWER PIPES WITH LESS THAN 8' OF COVER.RCWD UTILITY NOTES:1.DEVELOPER MUST PROVIDE AN AS-BUILT SURVEY OF THE INVERT ELEVATIONSOF ALL CULVERTS EXTENDING INTO JD3 (DRAINAGE DITCH).1.1.OS 61, FES 60
Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.0CIVIL DETAILS............10'FINISHED GRADETOOLED CONTROL JOINTSEE DETAIL (TYP.)LIGHT BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TOTRAFFIC WITH 3" WIDE SMOOTHTROWELLED EDGE6" CONCRETE AS SPECIFIED6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASECOMPACTED SUBGRADENOTES:1. INSTALLATION SHALL BE CERTIFIED AND IN ACCORDANCE TO AN ON-SITEA.C.I. TECHNICIAN AS SPECIFIED.2. SEE GEO-TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GROSS WEIGHTREQUIREMENTS.3. SEE LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR LIMITS OF WALKS.4. SEE CONCRETE JOINT DETAIL FOR REQUIREMENTS.5. 1/2" WIDE EXPANSION JOINT AND SEALANT AT ALL CURBS.CONCRETE WALK/PAD3"2"THIS OCCURS ONLY WHEREMULCH MEETS EDGE OF WALKLEAVE TOP OFMULCH DOWN 1"FROM TOP OF WALK30' B-B15'60' R/W15'15'GEOTECH REPORT RECOMMENDS:4" BITUMINOUS12" CLASS 518" GRANULAR BASE115'15'
Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.1CIVIL DETAILS............PIPE BEDDING - RCP & DIPN T S1PIPE BEDDING - PVCN T S2
Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.2CIVIL DETAILS............6"PROVIDE INSULATION PER PLAN FIELD VERIFY DEPTH6"4"6" (MIN.)NOTES:1. INSULATION BOARD TO BE CLOSED CELL. EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE FOAM MEETINGASTM 578, TYPE VI, 40PSI COMPRESSING STRENGTH (ASTM D1621) 0.1%MAX. WATERABSORPTION (ASTM C272).2. BACKFILL MATERIAL AROUND INSULATION MUST BE FINE SAND FREE FROM ROOT,ORGANIC MATERIAL, OR OTHER INJURIOUS MATERIALS.3. OVERLAP ALL INSULATION BOARD JOINTS.UTILITY PIPE INSULATION DETAILN T S1'-6" (MIN)PIPE BEDDINGMATERIALBACKFILL MATERIALFINE SAND (FA7)MIN. 2' WIDE BY 4" THICKINSULATION BOARD(USE 2-2" THICKBOARDS). MASTIC ALLJOINTSEXTEND INSULATIONBOARD DOWNSIDES TO 7.5' DEPTH.FINISH GRADEDIA DIA + 3'UTILITY PIPE12OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTUREN T SHOT-DIPPED GALVANIZEDGRATE IN TWO SECTIONSMINIMUM6 CUBIC YARDSCLASS-3 RIP-RAPPROVIDE 4-1/2" SSANCHOR BOLTSWITH CLIPS1/8"x1"-2" O.C.1/8" BARS-3" O.C.OUTLETPIPEMONOLITHIC BOTTOMCL-5 AGGREGATEAS DIRECTEDBY ENGINEERCONCRETE SECTIONPRECAST REINFORCEDASTM C-478 NOTES:1. NO STRUCTURE SHALL BE ORDERED UNTIL ENGINEERAPPROVES SHOP DRAWINGS.2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING PONDOUTLET SKIMMER PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE.3. PLACE GEOTEXTILE BLANKET UNDER ALL RIPRAP."W" *WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALLBE CLASS II PRECAST PIPE,MNDOT STANDARD PLATENO. 3000L6"W60"O.D.48"I.D.* MNDOT STANDARD PLATE NO. 3000L*** MNDOT STANDARD PLATE NO. 4011E"O.D.""I.D."ALL DOGHOUSES SHALLBE GROUTED ON INSIDEAND OUTSIDE. ALLGROUTING SHALL BE WITHNON-SHRINKING CEMENT.18" ORIFICEINV.=909.00INV.=909.00WEIR WALLINV NOTCH / NWL=911.50INV TOPWEIR WALL913.50INV.=913.50INV 914.00INV. STRUCTURE=909.00TOP 18" ORIFICE = 910.50
Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONC5.3CIVIL DETAILS............CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE/RISERREMARKSCASTING SCHEDULENOTE:1.CASTINGS SHALL BE NEENAH FOUNDRY CASTINGS OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT.2.CASTINGS SHALL BE STAMPED WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY NAME ("STORM SEWER", "SANITARY SEWER")CASTING SCHEDULEN T SGRATE TYPE(NEENAH)STORM CURB INLETR-3067TBD STORM AREA DRAIN INLETR-2501TBDSTORM MANHOLER-1642TBDRIPRAP OUTLET / OVERFLOWN T SEARTH DIKE10:1 SIDESLOPES ONDITCH SIDESECTION A-AISOMETRIC VIEW3 FT MIN.TOP WIDTHL = 8 FT.2 FT MIN.VARIESWEIR CRESTINSTALL ENKAMAT PER MANUF. SPECIFICATIONSEARTH BERMEARTH DIKEFLOWFLOWFLOWSEE GRADIGN PLAN FORBASIN DEPTHGROUND LINE /BASIN BOTTOMENKAMAT OR APPROVEDALTERNATEREINFORCED TURF MATTINGEXTEND ENKAMAT PER RCWDDIRECTION. NEED TO PREVENTEROSION WITHOUTREMOVING VOLUME FROM DITCH14" PVC DRAIN TILE DETAILN T S8"PAVEMENT BASEAGGREGATE BASEMNDOT FINE FILTERAGGREGATE 3149.2J4" PERFORRATED PVC PERMNDOT 3278 W/ FABRIC SOCKGEOTEXTILE FABRICMNDOT 3733, TYPE 1ON SIDES ANDBOTTOM ONLYSTABILIZEDSUBGRADENOTE: FOR USE WITH CLAY SUBGRADES ORIN AREAS WITH LESS THAN 4 VERTICAL FEETOF FILL IF USING GRANULAR SUBGRADES.32
S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44
N89°40'02"E 1320.77WETLAND A63,656 SFWETLAND D110,900 SFWETLAND H1555 SF(DITCHED)WETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND G16,910 SFWETLAND E67,678 SFWETLAND 858,590 SFDITCH 7WETLAND 858,590 SFWETLAND 10/1320,749 SFWETLAND D23774 SFWETLAND XBLOCK
1
B
L
O
C
K
2
B
L
O
C
K
3BLOCK 6BLOCK
5BLOCK 4BLOCK
5BLOCK 7BL
O
C
K
8
BLOC
K
3
B
L
O
C
K
3
BLO
C
K
6
B
L
O
C
K
5
B
L
O
C
K
9
B
L
O
C
K
9
BLO
C
K
9
OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTD(42
,299
SF
)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)OUTLOTE(29
,702
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)OUTLOTA(83
,216
SF
)OUTLOTA(83
,216
SF
)EOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOF914.50EOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOF
EOFWE
T
L
A
N
D
D
4
2
8
0
6
S
FLOW FLOOR=918.50(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=918.00(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=918.50(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=920.00(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=919.70(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=919.00(per lot cert, verify)TREESQTYCOMMON / BOTANICAL NAMECONT20Green Mountain Sugar Maple / Acer saccharum `Green Mountain` TM2.5" Cal. B&B49Autumn Blaze Maple / Acer x freemanii `Jeffsred` TM2.5" Cal. B&B46Imperial Honey Locust / Gleditsia triacanthos inermis `Impcole` TM2.5" Cal. B&B5Burr Oak / Quercus macrocarpa2.5" Cal. B&B17Regal Prince Oak / Quercus x warei `Long` TM2.5" Cal. B&B29American Sentry Linden / Tilia americana `McKSentry` TM2.5" Cal. B&B28Harvest Gold Linden / Tilia cordata x mongolica `Harvest Gold`2.5" Cal. B&B34Cathedral Elm / Ulmus x `Cathedral`2.5" Cal. B&BPLANT SCHEDULECivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202026980KEVIN TEPPENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.0OVERALLLANDSCAPE PLAN............01" = 80'-0"80'-0"40'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLAWN - SOD, SALT TOLLERANTSEED TYPE 1 - MNDOT 33-261 STORMWATER SOUTH &WEST, PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUALSPECIFICATIONS (2014)SEED TYPE 2 - MNDOT 35-221 DRY PRAIRIE, PERMNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014)PROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULEAND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESSEED TYPE 3 - MNDOT 25-131 TURF, PER MNDOTSEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014)LANDSCAPE NOTES:1.WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH(MINIMUM AFTER INSTALLATION AND/OR TOP DRESSING OPERATIONS) OFSHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH.2.ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO OUTEREDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCHSHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK.3.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OFNURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROMDISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FORMAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCEPERIOD.4.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTSSHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLANSHALL GOVERN.5.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPEMATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR TWO (2) FULLGROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE.6.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4" LAYERTOPSOIL AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THEDRAWINGS.7.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTILACCEPTANCE.8.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPECONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.9.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATEDFROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (UNDER TREES)THREE TIMES WIDTHOF ROOTBALLDECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTINGN T SPRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPEARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAINNORMAL TREE SHAPE)THREE 2"X4"X8' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWNWITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER.STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120° TO ONE ANOTHER.WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH NYLONSTRAPPING WITH GROMMETS. ALTERNATE STABILIZINGMETHODS MAY BE PROPOSED BY CONTRACTOR.TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1"-2" ABOVEEXISTING GRADEMULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OFPLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ROCK OR ORGANICMULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLANNOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROMPLANT TRUNKEXISTING GRADECUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOTBALL. IF NON-BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELYSLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OFPLANTING BEDBACKFILL AS SPECIFIEDCOMPACT BOTTOM OF PIT, TYP.RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ONLOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDSOR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENTSEED TYPE 4 - MNDOT 34-181 WETLAND EMERGENT,PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS(2014)1LEGEND
SEED TYPE 1 (TYP.)SEEDTYPE 1(TYP.)(TYP.)SEED TYPE 3 (TYP.)SEED TYPE 3 (TYP.)SEED TYPE 3 (TYP.)SEED TYPE 3 (TYP.)SEEDTYPE 2(TYP.)SEED TYPE 2(TYP.)SEED TYPE 2(TYP.)SEED TYPE 2(TYP.)SEED TYPE 2(TYP.)SEED TYPE 4(TYP.)SEED TYPE 4(TYP.)SEED TYPE 4(TYP.)SEED TYPE 4(TYP.)SEED TYPE 3(TYP.)SEED TYPE 4(TYP.)SEED TYPE 3(TYP.)SEED TYPE 3(TYP.)SEED TYPE 3(TYP.)SEED TYPE 2(TYP.)SEED TYPE 3(TYP.)SEED TYPE 3(TYP.)SEED TYPE 3(TYP.)SEED TYPE 2(TYP.)SEED TYPE 4(TYP.)SEED TYPE 4(TYP.)SB-1SB-2SB-5SB-6SB-7SB-3SB-4[14] Public Utility Easementper Doc. No. 3172032 S00°50'53"W 1320.44
N89°40'02"E 1320.77Wire FenceEdge of WoodsGravel DriveEdge of WaterWETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND G16,910 SFWETLAND E67,678 SFWETLAND D23774 SFLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONBLOCK 1
B
L
O
C
K
2
BLOCK 8
B
L
O
C
K
3
BLOCK 9
B
L
O
C
K
9
BLO
C
K
9
OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTE(29,702 SF)OUTLOTA(83
,216
SF
)OUTLOTA(83,216 SF)EOFEOFEOFEOF914.50EOF35'35'EOFEOFEOF
EOFSEED TYPE 3 (TYP.)SEED TYPE 3 (TYP.)[14] Public Utility Easement
per Doc. No. 3172032 Wire FenceWater TowerGravel DriveLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONWETLAND XLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.1LANDSCAPE PLAN............Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202026980KEVIN TEPPENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTAL01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRMATCH LINE
LAWN - SOD, SALT TOLLERANTSEED TYPE 1 - MNDOT 33-261 STORMWATER SOUTH &WEST, PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUALSPECIFICATIONS (2014)SEED TYPE 2 - MNDOT 35-221 DRY PRAIRIE, PERMNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014)PROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULEAND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESLEGENDSEED TYPE 3 - MNDOT 25-131 TURF, PER MNDOTSEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014)LANDSCAPE NOTES:1.WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH (MINIMUM AFTERINSTALLATION AND/OR TOP DRESSING OPERATIONS) OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH.2.ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OFSAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN AMINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK.3.PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMENSTANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE ANDDISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANTMATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD.4.UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THESCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN.5.CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTTHROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THECONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR TWO (2) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIALCOMPLETION DATE.6.ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4" LAYER TOPSOIL ANDSOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS.7.ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE.8.REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'SACTIVITIES.9.SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPECONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES.SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (UNDER TREES)SEED TYPE 4 - MNDOT 34-181 WETLAND EMERGENT,PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS(2014)
SEED TYPE 1 (TYP.)SEED TYPE 1 (TYP.)SEEDTYPE 1SEED TYPE 1 (TYP.)SEED TYPE 3 (TYP.)SEED TYPE 3(TYP.)SEED TYPE 2 (TYP.)SEEDTYPE 2(TYP.)SEED TYPE 2(TYP.)SEED TYPE 2(TYP.)SEED TYPE 2(TYP.)SEED TYPE 2(TYP.)SEED TYPE 4(TYP.)SEED TYPE 4(TYP.)SEED TYPE 4(TYP.)SEED TYPE 4(TYP.)SEED TYPE 2 (TYP.)SEED TYPE 3SEED TYPE 4SEED TYPE 3(TYP.)SEED TYPE 3(TYP.)SEED TYPE 3(TYP.)SEED TYPE 3(TYP.)SEED TYPE 3(TYP.)SEED TYPE 2 (TYP.)SEED TYPE 3(TYP.)SEED TYPE 4(TYP.)SEED TYPE 2 (TYP.)SB-8SB-9SB-10SB-11SB-12SB-4[13] Electrical TransmissionEasement per Doc. No. 185981 [15] Encroachment onto Sanitary SewerEasements per Doc. No. 3170523 and[17] Sewer Easement per Doc. No. 287225
S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44
N00°47'52"E 1324.35 Edge of WaterEdge of WaterWETLAND A63,656 SFWETLAND D110,900 SFWETLAND H1555 SF(DITCHED)WETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND 858,590 SFDITCH 7LIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS OFCONSTRUCTIONB
L
O
C
K
3BLOCK 6BLOCK 5BLOCK 4BLOCK 5BLOCK 7BLOC
K
3
BLO
C
K
6
BLOCK 5
B
L
O
C
K
9
BLO
C
K
9 OUTLOTD(42,299 SF)OUTLOTC(113,813
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTC(113,813
SF
)EOFEOFEOFEOFEOF35'10'10'EOFEOFWETLAND D4 2806 SF
REVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONL1.2LANDSCAPE PLANNOTES & DETAILS............Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202026980KEVIN TEPPENLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDERTHE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTAL01" = 50'-0"50'-0"25'-0"NKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLAWN - SOD, SALT TOLLERANTSEED TYPE 1 - MNDOT 33-261 STORMWATER SOUTH &WEST, PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUALSPECIFICATIONS (2014)SEED TYPE 2 - MNDOT 35-221 DRY PRAIRIE, PERMNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014)PROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULEAND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZESLEGENDSEED TYPE 3 - MNDOT 25-131 TURF, PER MNDOTSEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014)SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (UNDER TREES)SEED TYPE 4 - MNDOT 34-181 WETLAND EMERGENT,PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS(2014)
[13] Electrical Transmission
Easement per Doc. No. 185981
[15] Encroachment onto Sanitary Sewer
Easements per Doc. No. 3170523 and
[17] Sewer Easement per Doc. No. 287225
[14] Public Utility Easement
per Doc. No. 3172032
S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44
N89°40'02"E 1320.77N00°47'52"E 1324.35Wire FenceWire FenceDitchEdge of WaterEdge of WaterEdge of Water159TH ST N(A Public R/W)(Width Varies)WETLAND A63,656 SFWETLAND D110,900 SFWETLAND H1555 SF(DITCHED)WETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND G16,910 SFWETLAND E67,678 SFWETLAND 858,590 SFDITCH 8DITCH 7WETLAND 421247 SFWETLAND 858,590 SFWETLAND 10/1320,749 SFWETLAND D23774 SFWETLAND X35'35'35'10'10'WE
T
L
A
N
D
D
4
2
8
0
6
S
FPERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL AT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL AT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEINLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYPCivil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.0SWPPP - EXISTINGCONDITIONS............01" = 80'-0"80'-0"40'-0"N1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES.CITY OF HUGO EROSION CONTROL NOTES:1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT"GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTORSHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIREAN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOROBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BYTHE CITY.3. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES,DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.4. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION,INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROW1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITEROSION CONTROL BLANKETALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, ANDMEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION.
[13] Electrical Transmission
Easement per Doc. No. 185981
[15] Encroachment onto Sanitary Sewer
Easements per Doc. No. 3170523 and
[17] Sewer Easement per Doc. No. 287225
[14] Public Utility Easement
per Doc. No. 3172032
S89°29'46"W 1319.69S00°50'53"W 1320.44
N89°40'02"E 1320.77N00°47'52"E 1324.35Wire FenceEdge of WaterEdge of WaterEdge of WaterWETLAND A63,656 SFWETLAND D110,900 SFWETLAND H1555 SF(DITCHED)WETLAND F16,078 SFWETLAND G16,910 SFWETLAND E67,678 SFWETLAND 858,590 SFDITCH 7WETLAND 858,590 SFWETLAND 10/1320,749 SFWETLAND D23774 SFWETLAND XBLOCK
1
B
L
O
C
K
2
B
L
O
C
K
3BLOCK 6BLOCK
5BLOCK 4BLOCK
5BLOCK 7BL
O
C
K
8
BLOC
K
3
B
L
O
C
K
3
BLO
C
K
6
B
L
O
C
K
5
B
L
O
C
K
9
B
L
O
C
K
9
BLO
C
K
9
OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTD(42
,299
SF
)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)OUTLOTE(29
,702
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTB(224
,692
SF
)OUTLOTC(113
,813
SF
)OUTLOTA(83
,216
SF
)OUTLOTA(83
,216
SF
)EOFEOFEOFEOFEOFEOF914.50EOFEOFEOF35'35'35'10'10'EOFEOFEOFEOF
EOFWE
T
L
A
N
D
D
4
2
8
0
6
S
F
LOW FLOOR=918.50LOW FLOOR=920.00(per lot cert, verify)LOW FLOOR=919.70PERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL AT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSION CONTROLAT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETER EROSIONCONTROL AT CONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.PERIMETEREROSIONCONTROL ATCONSTRUCTIONLIMITS, TYP.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDEINLET PROTECTION AT ALLDOWNSTREAM CATCHBASINS.CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCEINLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYPINLETPROTECTIONAT CATCHBASINS, TYPINLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYPINLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYPINLET PROTECTION ATCATCH BASINS, TYPPLACE EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETON ALL SLOPES 4:1 ORSTEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)PLACE EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETON ALL SLOPES 4:1 ORSTEEPER, TYP.(MNDOT CATEGORY 3)Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.1SWPPP - PROPOSEDCONDITIONS............01" = 80'-0"80'-0"40'-0"N1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES.CITY OF HUGO EROSION CONTROL NOTES:1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT"GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITYLOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTORSHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURINGCONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.2. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIREAN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOROBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BYTHE CITY.3. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES,DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES.4. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSIONCONTROL NOTES.5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION,INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT.SWPPP NOTES:Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRLEGEND:EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALINLET PROTECTIONSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEDRAINAGE ARROW1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVALSILT FENCE / BIOROLL - GRADING LIMITEROSION CONTROL BLANKETALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, ANDMEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUMREQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURINGTHE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION.CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ON ALLSLOPES 4:1 AND STEEPER.
Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.2SWPPP - DETAILS............PROFILE6" MIN CRUSHED STONE75' MINIMUMPLANFINISHEDGRADETO CONSTRUCTION AREA35' REXISTINGUNDISTURBEDROADWAYN T S30' FROM EDGE OF ROADTO FRONT OF SPEED BUMPGEOTEXTILE FILTERFABRIC4" HIGH, 18" WIDESPEED BUMPSTABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS24' (MIN)NOTES:1.PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBEDROADWAY.2.THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENTONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDINGSTONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE.3.REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT.4.ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED ASDIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER.5.FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES.6.CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1-1/2" DIA. CLOSE GRADED, AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118.EXISTING UNDISTURBED ROADWAY35' RTO CONSTRUCTIONAREA1TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL.SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES,10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROMTRENCHOVERLAP: BURY UPPER ENDOF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A'AND 'B'. OVERLAP END OFTOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE.EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTINGBURIED IN SILT TRENCH ANDTAMPED. DOUBLEROW OFSTAPLES.PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APARTTO KEEP MATTING FIRMLYPRESSED TO SOIL.'D''C''B'BURY THE TOP END OF THEMATTING IN A TRENCH 4" ORMORE IN DEPTHTYPICAL STAPLE #8GAUGE WIRE1 1/2"10"OVERFALL'E''A'NOTE:1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TOKEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TOSOIL.EROSION BLANKETN T S3FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIEDEXISTING GROUNDSURFACEDIRECTION OF FLOWWOODEN STAKES 1/2"X2"X16" MIN. PLACED 10' O.C.WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ONPVMT. PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP ATMIN. 10' O.C.8" MIN.SEDIMENT BIO-ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOGN T SFILLER AS SPECIFIEDNOTE:1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BIO ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL.2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60%-70%PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER MNDOT SPEC 3897.3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 3/8".4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12" AT ENDS AND STAKE.5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARYBY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION.FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH2" OF DIRT OR COMPOST TOEMBED ROLL.4FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE SUPPORT NETAS SPECIFIED.METAL POST ASSPECIFIED.FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURETO WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METALCLIPS 12"O.C.SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4" x 4"WIRE HOOKED ONTOPREFORMED CHANNELS ONPOSTS AS SPECIFIED.EXISTING GROUNDSURFACECARRY WIRE SUPPORT NETDOWN INTO TRENCHDIRECTION OF FLOWANCHOR FABRIC WITHSOIL, TAMP BACKFILLMETAL POSTS 8'-0" O.C.MAX.24"
24"
24"
MIN.
6"6"SEDIMENT FENCEN T S2
Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.3SWPPP - NARRATIVE............OWNER INFORMATIONTRAINING SECTION 21PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENTSTORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMPERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THE CITY ISRESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM.AREAS AND QUANTITIES:SWPPP CONTACT PERSONCONTRACTOR:SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING:ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY APERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THENPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT.TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THECONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPPNOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACTQUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION.PROJECT NARRATIVE:PROJECT IS SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION CREATING +/- 87 NEW LOTS. SITE AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL OCCUR.NATIVE BUFFER NARRATIVE:PRESERVING A 50' NATURAL BUFFER AROUND WATER BODIES IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT BECAUSE WATER BODIES ARE NOTLOCATED ON SITE.INFILTRATION NARRATIVE:INFILTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THE PROJECT BECAUSE SOIL CONDITIONS DO NOT ALLOW FOR INFILTRATION. WET BASINS AREPROPOSED.SOIL CONTAMINATION NARRATIVE:SOILS ONSITE HAVE NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED AS CONTAMINATED. AN MPCA SOILS ASSESSMENT WAS COMPLETED AND IT WAS DETERMINED THATTHIS SITE IS APPROPRIATE FOR INFILTRATION, BUT DOES NOT APPLY.SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED):THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN ONE MILE AND DISCHARGES TO HARDWOOD CREEK AND IS IDENTIFIED AS AN IMPAIRED WATER BODY PER THE MPCA'S303(D) IMPAIRED WATERS LIST. HARDWOOD CREEK IS IMPAIRED FOR DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND FISH BIOASSESSMENT INDICATORS. BECAUSETHESE WATERS ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SITE, BMPS AS DEFINED IN THE NPDES PERMIT ITEMS 23.9 AND 23.10 APPLY. THESE AREAS FOLLOWS:1.DURING CONSTRUCTION:A.STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE COMPLETEDLATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLYCEASED.B.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 14. MUST BE USED FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THATSERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME.PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC:PERMANENT SEED MIX·FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE PERMANENT SEED MIX.··AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PERACRE.··DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE.·MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES:THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES.THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THECONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES IN THE NPDES PERMIT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION.SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER):CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE OVERALL SWPPP PACKAGE:ATTACHMENT A. CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE - SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENTATTACHMENT B. CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLISTATTACHMENT C. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMSATTACHMENT D: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.ATTACHMENT E: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.DESIGN ENGINEER: MATTHEW R. PAVEK P.E.TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPPTRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTAINSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMANDATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 5/15/2011 - 5/16/2011TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12RE-CERTIFICATION: 2/27/2020 (8 HOURS), EXP. 5/31/2023THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHOIMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUSTCOMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATEDAUGUST 1, 2018 # MNR100001) AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATIONCONTROL.STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTSSWPPPTHE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS ANDSPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FORADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOW LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENTEROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT.THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS:1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL ADJACENT AND DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS5. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL6. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (SECTION 14)7. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE8. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL9. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE10. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES11. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES12. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S13. INSTALL STREET SECTION14. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER15. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS16. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD, INSTALL SEED AND MULCH17. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND18. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.)19. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVESILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL.RECORDS RETENTION:THE SWPPP (ORIGINAL OR COPIES) INCLUDING, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT ATTHE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPPCAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS.ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE (3) YEARS AFTERSUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN SECTION 4. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT.1.THE FINAL SWPPP;2.ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT;3.RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE SECTION 11, INSPECTIONS ANDMAINTENANCE);4.ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY,CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE; AND5.ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS.SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES:1.THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT.2.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON-SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP, INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OFTHE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTIONAND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THESWPPP.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCTINSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEREQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURSUPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) AS REQUIRED BYTHE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAINING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OFCONSTRUCTION OR AS SOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE:4.1.NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PER SECTION 21 OFTHE PERMIT.4.2.DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING.4.3.CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING.5.FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNER IS EXPECTED TOFURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE (O & M) OF THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTSSWPPP AMENDMENTS (SECTION 6):1.ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.A OR ITEM 21.2.B OR ANOTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL MUST COMPLETE ALLSWPPP CHANGES. CHANGES INVOLVING THE USE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP MUST INCLUDE A JUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOWTHE REPLACEMENT BMP IS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS.2.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMSIDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE,WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVING A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERSOR GROUNDWATER.3.PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMSIDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BY THE SITE OWNER OR OPERATOR, USEPAOR MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE IN ELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OFPOLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER OR THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARDEXCEEDANCES (E.G., NUISANCE CONDITIONS AS DEFINED IN MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITHTHE OBJECTIVES OF A USEPA APPROVED TMDL.BMP SELECTION AND INSTALLATION (SECTION 7):1.PERMITTEES MUST SELECT, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN THE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP AND IN THIS PERMIT IN AN APPROPRIATEAND FUNCTIONAL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERINGPRACTICES.EROSION PREVENTION (SECTION 8):1.BEFORE WORK BEGINS, PERMITTEES MUST DELINEATE THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED.2.PERMITTEES MUST MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR DISTURBANCE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT WITH STEEP SLOPES. WHEN STEEPSLOPES MUST BE DISTURBED, PERMITTEES MUST USE TECHNIQUES SUCH AS PHASING AND STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNEDFOR STEEP SLOPES (E.G., SLOPE DRAINING AND TERRACING).3.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, INCLUDING STOCKPILES. STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELYTO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THESITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 14 CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON CONSTRUCTED BASECOMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON TEMPORARY STOCKPILESWITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETESTOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) BUT PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE.4.FOR PUBLIC WATERS THAT THE MINNESOTA DNR HAS PROMULGATED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURING SPECIFIED FISHSPAWNING TIME FRAMES, PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THEWATER'S EDGE, AND THAT DRAIN TO THESE WATERS, WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING THE RESTRICTION PERIOD.5.PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF THE LAST 200 LINEAR FEET OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENTDRAINAGE DITCHES OR SWALES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATEROR PROPERTY EDGE. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF REMAINING PORTIONS OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENTDITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE ANDCONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES.6.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DURING CONSTRUCTION(WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK-DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES, ETC.) DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. PERMITTEESMUST STABILIZE THESE AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THEIR USE AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM CEASES7.PERMITTEES MUST NOT USE MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICESWITHIN ANY PORTION OF THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALESECTION WITH A CONTINUOUS SLOPE OF GREATER THAN 2 PERCENT.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT ALL PIPE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTERCONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER OR PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM.9.PERMITTEES MUST NOT DISTURB MORE LAND (I.E., PHASING) THAN CAN BE EFFECTIVELY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED INACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 11.SEDIMENT CONTROL (SECTION 9):1.PERMITTEES MUST ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERS OF THE SITE AND DOWNGRADIENTAREAS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO ANY SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATESEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROLPRACTICES BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND-DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN AND MUST KEEP THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICESIN PLACE UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER.2.IF DOWNGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED, BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OR EXCESSIVE MAINTENANCEREQUIREMENTS, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TOELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND AMEND THE SWPPP TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN ITEM 6.3.3.TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENTSYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK-CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITECONDITIONS.4.A FLOATING SILT CURTAIN PLACED IN THE WATER IS NOT A SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP TO SATISFY ITEM 9.2 EXCEPT WHEN WORKINGON A SHORELINE OR BELOW THE WATERLINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT TERM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G.,INSTALLATION OF RIP RAP ALONG THE SHORELINE) IN THAT AREA IS COMPLETE, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL AN UPLANDPERIMETER CONTROL PRACTICE IF EXPOSED SOILS STILL DRAIN TO A SURFACE WATER.5.PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERMACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES, IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY ISCOMPLETED. PERMITTEES MUST RE-INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IFTHE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE.6.PERMITTEES MUST PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS USING APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THEYESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER ON ALL AREAS WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET.7.PERMITTEES MAY REMOVE INLET PROTECTION FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (E.G. STREETFLOODING/FREEZING) IS IDENTIFIED BY THE PERMITTEES OR THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G.,CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER). PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE NEEDFOR REMOVAL IN THE SWPPP.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF STOCKPILES ON THEDOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER.9.PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE STOCKPILES OUTSIDE OF NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATERCONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. 10. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING BMP TO MINIMIZE THE TRACK OUT OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITEOR ONTO PAVED ROADS WITHIN THE SITE. 11. PERMITTEES MUST USE STREET SWEEPING IF VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRACKINGONTO THE STREET. 12. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14. 13. IN ANY AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE FINAL VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION WILL OCCUR, PERMITTEES MUST RESTRICT VEHICLE ANDEQUIPMENT USE TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. 14. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 15. PERMITTEES MUST DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 16. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR, IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE ON THE SITE, PROVIDE REDUNDANT(DOUBLE) PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTHDISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENTCONTROLS AT LEAST 5 FEET APART UNLESS LIMITED BY LACK OF AVAILABLE SPACE. NATURAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIREDADJACENT TO ROAD DITCHES, JUDICIAL DITCHES, COUNTY DITCHES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAININLETS, AND SEDIMENT BASINS. IF PRESERVING THE BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE REASONS IN THESWPPP. SHEET PILING IS A REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROL IF INSTALLED IN A MANNER THAT RETAINS ALL STORMWATER. 17. PERMITTEES MUST USE POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS IN ACCORDANCE WITHACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BYTHE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER. THE PERMITTEES MUST USE CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TOCHEMICAL ADDITION AND MUST DIRECT TREATED STORMWATER TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR FILTRATION ORSETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE.DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (SECTION 10):1.PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G.,PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECTSITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MAY DEWATER TO SURFACE WATERS IF THEY VISUALLY CHECK TO ENSURE ADEQUATETREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND NUISANCE CONDITIONS (SEE MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) WILL NOT RESULT FROM THEDISCHARGE. IF PERMITTEES CANNOT DISCHARGE THE WATER TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING A SURFACEWATER, PERMITTEES MUST TREAT IT WITH APPROPRIATE BMPS SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THESURFACE WATER OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES.2.IF PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE WATER CONTAINING OIL OR GREASE, THEY MUST USE AN OIL-WATER SEPARATOR OR SUITABLEFILTRATION DEVICE (E.G., CARTRIDGE FILTERS, ABSORBENTS PADS) PRIOR TO DISCHARGE.3.PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN-DRAINING ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOTCAUSE EROSION OR SCOUR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS OR INUNDATION OF WETLANDS IN THE IMMEDIATEVICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS THAT CAUSES SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND.4.IF PERMITTEES USE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THEY MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURNTHE BACKWASH WATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THESITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION.INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SECTION 11):1.PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE A TRAINED PERSON, AS IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 21.2.B, WILL INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE ATLEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATERTHAN 1/2 INCH IN 24 HOURS.2.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT BMPS.3.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTION PREVENTIONMANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS. PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENTALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY UNLESSANOTHER TIME FRAME IS SPECIFIED IN ITEM 11.5 OR 11.6. PERMITTEES MAY TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME IF FIELD CONDITIONS PREVENTACCESS TO THE AREA.4.DURING EACH INSPECTION, PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES AND CONVEYANCESYSTEMS BUT NOT CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITION. PERMITTEES MUSTREMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHERDRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. PERMITTEES MUSTCOMPLETE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL,REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. PERMITTEES MUST USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ACCESS. IFPRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF OBTAINING ACCESS. PERMITTEES ARERESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLEPERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK IN SURFACE WATERS.5.PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS WITHINAND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FOR SEDIMENTATION FROM EROSION OR TRACKED SEDIMENT FROM VEHICLES. PERMITTEESMUST REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM ALL PAVED SURFACES WITHIN ONE (1) CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY OR, IF APPLICABLE, WITHINA SHORTER TIME TO AVOID A SAFETY HAZARD TO USERS OF PUBLIC STREETS.6.PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONALOR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE.7.PERMITTEES MUST DRAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND REMOVE THE SEDIMENT WHEN THE DEPTHOF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME.8.PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THAT AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT ON THE SITE (OR AVAILABLE TO THE PROJECT SITE INTHREE (3) CALENDAR DAYS) IS TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.B.9.PERMITTEES MAY ADJUST THE INSPECTION SCHEDULE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 11.2 AS FOLLOWS:a. INSPECTIONS OF AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH, EVEN IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITYCONTINUES ON OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE; ORb.WHERE SITES HAVE PERMANENT COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING ANYWHEREON THE SITE, INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH AND, AFTER 12 MONTHS, MAY BE SUSPENDEDCOMPLETELY UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY RESUMES. THE MPCA MAY REQUIRE INSPECTIONS TO RESUME IF CONDITIONSWARRANT; ORc.WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, INSPECTIONS MAY BESUSPENDED. INSPECTIONS MUST RESUME WITHIN 24 HOURS OF RUNOFF OCCURRING, OR UPON RESUMING CONSTRUCTION,WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 10. PERMITTEES MUST RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEING CONDUCTED ANDTHESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. THESE RECORDS MUST INCLUDE:a.DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; ANDb.NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; ANDc.ACCURATE FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE NEEDED; ANDd.CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES); ANDe.DATE OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALL FOR EACH EVENT.PERMITTEES MUST OBTAIN RAINFALL AMOUNTS BY EITHER A PROPERLY MAINTAINED RAIN GAUGE INSTALLED ONSITE, AWEATHER STATION THAT IS WITHIN ONE (1) MILE OF YOUR LOCATION, OR A WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM THAT PROVIDESSITE SPECIFIC RAINFALL DATA FROM RADAR SUMMARIES; ANDf.IF PERMITTEES OBSERVE A DISCHARGE DURING THE INSPECTION, THEY MUST RECORD AND SHOULD PHOTOGRAPH ANDDESCRIBE THE LOCATION OF THE DISCHARGE (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, SETTLED OR SUSPENDED SOLIDS, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHEROBVIOUS INDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS); ANDg.ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION MUST BE DOCUMENTED AS REQUIRED INSECTION 6 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS.POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (SECTION 12):1.PERMITTEES MUST PLACE BUILDING PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING ORTEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER.PERMITTEES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COVER OR PROTECT PRODUCTS WHICH ARE EITHER NOT A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TOSTORMWATER OR ARE DESIGNED TO BE EXPOSED TO STORMWATER.2.PERMITTEES MUST PLACE PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING ORTEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER.3.PERMITTEES MUST STORE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE, (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULICFLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM-BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS)IN SEALED CONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTEMATERIALS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7045 INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AS APPLICABLE.4.PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7035.5.PERMITTEES MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKED OVER. PERMITTEESMUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7041.6.PERMITTEES MUST TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL,FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED INCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS ORABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UPDISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS.PERMITTEES MUST REPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. 115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UPMEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE.7.PERMITTEES MUST LIMIT VEHICLE EXTERIOR WASHING AND EQUIPMENT TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE. PERMITTEES MUSTCONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND MUSTDISPOSE WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY PROPERLY. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS,OR SOLVENTS.8.PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUTOPERATIONS (E.G., CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTIONMATERIALS) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PERMITTEES MUST PREVENT LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES FROMCONTACTING THE GROUND AND MUST DESIGN THE CONTAINMENT SO IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUTOPERATIONS OR AREAS. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA RULES.PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A SIGN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY.PERMIT TERMINATION (SECTION 4 AND SECTION 13):1.PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ALL TERMINATION CONDITIONS LISTED IN SECTION 13 ARE COMPLETE.2.PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER SELLING OR OTHERWISE LEGALLY TRANSFERRING THE ENTIRE SITE,INCLUDING PERMIT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ROADS (E.G., STREET SWEEPING) AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINAL CLEANOUT, OR TRANSFERRING PORTIONS OF A SITE TO ANOTHER PARTY. THE PERMITTEES' COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMITTERMINATES AT MIDNIGHT ON THE SUBMISSION DATE OF THE NOT.3.PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MUST INSTALL PERMANENT COVER OVER ALL AREAS PRIOR TOSUBMITTING THE NOT. VEGETATIVE COVER MUST CONSIST OF A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATION WITH A DENSITY OF 70PERCENT OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATESNO VEGETATION, SUCH AS IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR THE BASE OF A SAND FILTER.4.PERMITTEES MUST CLEAN THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND MUSTENSURE THE SYSTEM MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 15 THROUGH 19 AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED.5.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT.6.PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TOSUBMITTING THE NOT. PERMITTEES MAY LEAVE BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON-SITE IN PLACE.7.FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ONLY, PERMIT COVERAGE TERMINATES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IF THE STRUCTURES ARE FINISHEDAND TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL IS COMPLETE, THE RESIDENCE SELLS TO THEHOMEOWNER, AND THE PERMITTEE DISTRIBUTES THE MPCA'S "HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET" TO THE HOMEOWNER.8.FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (E.G., PIPELINES ACROSS CROPLAND), PERMITTEES MUST RETURN THEDISTURBED LAND TO ITS PRECONSTRUCTION AGRICULTURAL USE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT.SEED NOTES:ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL.GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS:THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SALVAGE AND PRESERVE EXISTING TOPSOIL NECESSARY FOR FINAL STABILIZATION AND TOALSO MINIMIZE COMPACTION IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDING THE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUMDEPTH OF 3 INCHES.TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET.SEED·TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111 (OATS COVER CROP)FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEED MIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT A SEEDING RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE.MULCH·IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE SEEDGERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90% COVERAGE (2 TONS PER ACRE OF STRAW MULCH)SLOPES·3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH·SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET.·SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS.Golden Valley Land Company6001 Glenwood AvenueGolden Valley, MN 55422CONTACT: Peter Knaeblepeterknaeble@gmail.com612-309-9215
Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.4SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS............ATTACHMENT A: SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENTPROJECT NAME: THE MEADOWS AT HUGOPROJECT LOCATION (BRIEFLY DESCRIBE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OCCURS. INCLUDE ADDRESS IF AVAILABLE.)ADDRESS: HUGO, MNCITY OR TOWNSHIP: HUGOSTATE: MNZIP CODE: 55038LATITUDE/LONGITUDE OF APPROXIMATE CENTROID OF PROJECT: 45.18255 N, -92.99819 EMETHOD OF LAT/LONG COLLECTION (CIRCLE ONE): GPS ONLINE TOOL USGS TOPOGRAPHICALL CITIES WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: HUGOALL COUNTIES WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: WASHINGTONALL TOWNSHIPS WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: N/APROJECT SIZE (NUMBER OF ACRES TO BE DISTURBED): 26.5PROJECT TYPE (CIRCLE ONE): RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ROAD CONSTRUCTION RESIDENTIAL & RD CONSTRUCTION OTHER (DESCRIBE):CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (TO THE NEAREST TENTH ACRE)EXISTING AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE : 00.0POST CONSTRUCTION AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 10.7TOTAL NEW AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 10.7RECEIVING WATERSWATER BODY IDNAME OF WATER BODY WATER BODY TYPE SPECIAL WATER? (Y/N) IMPARIED WATER (Y/N)N/A...COUNTY DITCH...DITCH...N...N...DATES OF CONSTRUCTIONCONSTRUCTION START DATE: SUMMER 2021ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: FALL 2023GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT INFORMATIONDESCRIBE THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (WHAT WILL BE BUILT, GENERAL TIMELINE, ETC): SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING ROADS, UTILITIES, GRADING, PONDING.DESCRIBE SOIL TYPES FOUND AT THE PROJECT: CLAYSITE LOCATION MAP - ATTACH MAPS (U.S. GEOLOGIC SURVEY 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAPS OR EQUIVALENT) SHOWING THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL RECEIVING WATERS, INCLUDINGWETLANDS, DRAINAGE DITCHES, STORMWATER PONDS, OR BASINS, ETC. THAT WILL RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT. USE ARROWS SHOWING THE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND DISTANCE TO THE WATER BODY.GENERAL SITE INFORMATION (III.A)1. DESCRIBE THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICIES (BMP'S). INCLUDE THE TIMING FOR INSTALLATION AND PROCEDURESUSED TO ESTABLISH ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY BMP'S AS NECESSARY. (III.A.4.A)THE PROJECT IS PROTECTED BY TWO (W) MAIN BMP'S, SILT FENCE AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. THE SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE AND MONITORED AS NECESSARY. INLETPROTECTION DEVIDES WILL BE INSTALLED IN ALL CATCH BASINS ON THE SITE AND ANY OFF SITE THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THIS SITE. AS THE PROJECT PROGRESSES ADDITIONAL BMP'S SUCH AS EROSIONCONTROL BLANKET MAY BE UTILITZED.2. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A TABLE WITH THE ANTICIPATED QUANTITIES FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT FOR ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (III.A.4.B) SEE PAGE SW1.33. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A SITE MAP THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING FEATURES (III.A.3.B-F):EXIST AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMRWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS.LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AND SOIL TYPES.·EXISTING AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST-CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS.·LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED.·LOCATION OF AREAS OF PHASED CONSTRUCTION.·ALL SURFACE WATERS AND EXISTING WETLANDS WITHIN ONE MILE FROM THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE (IDENTIFIABLE ON MAPS SUCH AS USGS 7.5 MINUTEQUADRANGLE MAPS OR EQUIVALENT. WHERE SURFACE WATERS RECEIVING RUNOFF ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WILL NOT FIT ON THE PLAN SHEET, THEY MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH AN ARROW,INDICATING BOTH DIRECTION AND DISTANCE TO THE SURFACE WATER.·METHODS TO BE USED FOR FINAL STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREA4. WERE STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRED AS THE RESULT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, OR OTHER REQUIRED LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL REVIEW OF THE PROJECT? NOIF YES, DESCRIBE HOW THESE MEASURES WERE ADDRESSED IN THE SWPPP. (III.A.6)N/A5. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED IN A KARST AREA SUCH THAT ADDITIONAL MEASURES WOULD BE NECESSARY TO PROJECT DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS AS DESCRIBED IN MINN. R. CHAPTERS 7050 AND 7060? NOIF YES, DESCRIBE THE ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO BE USED. (III.A.7)N/A6. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A CALCEREOUS FEN LISTED IN MINN. R. 7050.0180, SUBP. 6 B? NOIF YES, A LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO APPLICATION FOR THIS PERMIT. (PART I B.6 AND PART III.A.8)7. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A WATER THAT IS LISTED AS IMPARED FOR THE FOLLOWING POLLUTANT(S) OR STRESSOR(S): PHOSPHORUS, TURBIDITY, DISSOLVED OXYGEN OR BIOTIC IMPAIRMENT? USE THE SPECIAL ANDIMPAIRED WATERS SEARCH TOOL AT: WWW.PCA.STATE.MN.US/WATER/STORMWATER/STORMWATER-C.HTMLN/AIF NO, SKIP TO TRAININGDOES THE IMPAIRED WATER HAVE AN APPROVED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS (TMDL) WITH AN APPROVED WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY? NOIF YES:A. LIST THE RECEIVING WATER, THE AREAS OF THE SITE DISCHARGING TO IT, AND THE POLLUTANT(S) IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL.B. LIST THE BMP'S AND ANY OTHER SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RELATED IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL.IF THE SITE HAS A DISCHARGE POINT WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE IMPAIRED WATER AND THE WATER FLOWS TO THE IMPAIRED WATER BUT NO SPECIFIC BMPS FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL, THE ADDITIONALBMPS IN APPENDIX A (C.1, C.2, C.3 & (C.4-TROUT STREAM)) MUST BE ADDED TO THE SWPPP AND IMPLEMENTED. (III.A.7). THE ADDITIONAL BMPS ONLY APPLY TO THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT THAT DRAIN TO ONE OF THEIDENTIFIED DISCHARGE POINTS.N/A8. IDENTIFY ADJACENT PUBLIC WATERS WHERE THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) HAS DECLARED “WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS” DURING FISH SPAWNING TIMEFRAMESN/ASELECTION OF A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (III.D.)1. WILL THE PROJECT CREATE A NEW CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO ONE ACRE? YESIF YES, A WATER QUALITY VOLUME OF ONE INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE CUMULATIVE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE (SEE PART III.D OF THE PERMIT) THROUGH INFILTRATION UNLESS PROHIBITED DUETO ONE OF THE REASONS IN PART III.D.1.J. IF INFILTRATION IS PROHIBITED IDENTIFY OTHER METHOD OF OTHER VOLUME REDUCTION (E.G., FILTRATION SYSTEM, WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN, REGIONAL PONDING OR EQUIVALENTMETHOD2. DESCRIBE WHICH METHOD WILL BE USED TO TREAT RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT (III.D):·WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN·INFILTRATION/FILTRATION·REGIONAL PONDS·COMBINATION OF PRACTICESINCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS AND DESIGN INFORMATION FOR THE METHOD SELECTED. SEE PART III.D OF THE PERMIT FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH EACH METHOD.WET SEDIMENTATION BASINCALCULATIONS ARE WITHIN THE SITE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT AND PART OF THIS SWPPP AS ATTACHMENT D.3. IF IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO MEET THE TREATMENT REQUIREMENT FOR THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME, DESCRIBE WHY. THIS CAN INCLUDE PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAYPRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANY PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENT, SUCH AS GRASSES SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS, WILL BE IMPLEMENTEDTO TREAT RUNOFF PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. (III.C)IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO MEET REQUIREMENT FOR WATER QUALITY VOLUME DUE TO CLAY SOILS.4. FOR PROJECTS THAT DISCHARGE TO TROUT STREAMS, INCLUDING TRIBUTARIES TO TROUT STREAMS, IDENTIFY METHOD OF INCORPORATING TEMPERATURE CONTROLS INTO THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENTSYSTEM.N/AEROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES (IV.B)DESCRIBE THE TYPES OF TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION BMP'S EXPECTED TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCITON:1. DESCRIBE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES TO MINIMIZE EROSION. DELINEATE AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED (E.G., WITH FLAGS,STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC.) BEFORE WORK BEGINS.SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE.2. DESCRIBE METHODS OF TEMPORARILY STABILIZING SOILS AND SOIL STOCKPILES (E.G., MULCHES, HYDRAULIC TACKIFIERS, EROSION BLANKETS, ETC.):TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION WILL BE SEED AND MULCH AND EROSION BLANKETS WHERE REQUIRED, WITH PERMANENT COVER BEING EITHER SOD OR LANDSCAPE FEATURES.3. DESCRIBE METHODS OF DISSIPATING VELOCITY ALONG STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND AT CHANNEL OUTLETS (E.G., CHECK DAMS, SEDIMENT TRAPS, RIP RAP, ETC.):SOD WILL BE UTILIZED ALONG CHANNELS AND RIP RAP AT CHANNEL.4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STABILIZATION OF DITCH AND SWALE WETTED PERIMETERS (NOTE THAT MULCH, HYDRAULIC SOIL TACKIFIERS, HYDROMULCHES, ETC. ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE SOIL STABILIZATION METHODSFOR ANY PART OF A DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE)FINAL STABILIZATION OF SWALES WILL BE SOD5. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE OUTLETS (E.G., RIP RAP, SPLASH PADS, GABIONS, ETC.)RIP RAP WILL BE UTILIZED AT PIPE OUTLETS6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO PROMOTE INFILTRATION AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL ON THE SITE PRIOR TO OFFSITE DISCHARGE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE (E.G., DIRECT STORMWATER FLOW TO VEGETATED AREAS):DISCONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREA AND INFILTRATION AREAS WILL BE UTILIZED7. FOR DRAINAGE OR DIVERSION DITCHES, DESCRIBE PRACTICES TO STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET OF THE PROPERTY EDGE OR POINT OF DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATER. THE LAST 200LINEAL FEET MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO SURFACE WATERS AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED FOR ALL DISCHARGES TOSPECIAL, IMPAIRED OR “WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS”. ALL OTHER REMAINING PORTIONS OF THE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER,PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT AREA HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED.IF USED, TEMPORARY DRAINAGE DITCHES WILL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION BLANKET AND HAY BALES / CHECK DAMS.8. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION MEASURES THAT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION (E.G., CONSTRUCTION PHASING, MINIMIZING SOIL DISTURBANCE, VEGETATIVE BUFFERS, HORIZONTALSLOPE GRADING, SLOPE DRAINING/TERRACING, ETC.):OTHER EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO; MINIMIZING SITE EXPOSURE WHEN POSSIBLE.9. IF APPLICABLE, INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN APPENDIX A PART C.3 REGARDING MAINTAINING A 100-FOOT BUFFER ZONE OR INSTALLING REDUNDANT BMPS FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO SPECIALWATERS).N/A10. IF APPLICABLE, DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE TO PROTECT PLANNED INFILTRATION AREASNOT APPLICABLESEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICIES (IV.C)DESCRIBE THE METHODS OF SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT IMPACTS TO SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS1. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL:SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SITE, AND AROUND WETLANDS AND DISCHARGE POINTS.2. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SOIL STOCKPILES:SEED AND MULCH AS WELL HYDROSEED WILL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY3. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION:SEE INLET PROTECTION DETAILS4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO MINIMIZE VEHICLE TRACKING AT CONSTRUCTION EXITS AND STREET SWEEPING ACTIVITIES:THE PROJECT WILL UTILIZE A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE.5. DESCRIBE METHODS, IF APPLICABLE, ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO BE INSTALLED TO KEEP RUNOFF AWAY FROM PLANNED INFILTRATION AREAS WHEN EXCAVATED PRIOR TO FINALSTABILIZATION OF THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA:SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING TO PROTECT STORMWATER AREAS.6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND PRESERVE TOP SOIL (UNLESS INFEASIBLE) AT THIS SITE:LIGHT TRACKED EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED, TOPSOIL WILL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED7. DESCRIBE PLANS TO PRESERVE A 50-FOOT NATURAL BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROJECT'S SOIL DISTURBANCE AND A SURFACE WATER OR PLANS FOR REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE:SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG WETLANDS AND CREEK8. DESCRIBE PLANS FOR USE OF SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS (E.G., POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, ETC.) SEE PART IV.C.10 OF THE PERMIT:N/A9. IS THE PROJECT REQUIRED TO INSTALL A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN DUE TO 10 OR MORE ACRES DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCATION OR 5 ACRES OR MORE IF THE SITE IS WITHIN 1 MILE OF A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER?NOIF YES, DESCRIBE (OR ATTACH PLANS ) SHOWING HOW THE BASIN WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART III.C OF THE PERMIT.N/ADEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (IV.D)1. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING? NOIF YES, DESCRIBE MEASURES TO BE USED TO TREAT/DISPOSE OF TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER AND METHOD TO PREVENT EROSION OR SCOUR OF DISCHARGE POINTS (SEE PART IV. D OF THE PERMIT):N/A 2. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE USE OF FILTERS FOR BACKWASH WATER? NOIF YES, DESCRIBE HOW FILTER BACKWASH WATER WILL BE MANAGED ON THE SITE OR PROPERLY DISPOSED (SEE PART III.D.3. OF THE PERMIT):N/AADDITIONAL BMP'S FOR SPECIAL WATERS AND DISCHARGES TO WETLANDS (APPENDIX A, PARTS C AND D)1. SPECIAL WATERS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE TO SPECIAL WATERS? NO2. IF PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAY PRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANY OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, THEN OTHER TREATMENT SUCH ASGRASSED SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENT WILL BE PROVIDED.N/A3. DESCRIBE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOR EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A CONTINUOUS POSITIVE SLOPE TO A SPECIAL WATERS, AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS FOR AREAS THAT DRAIN FIVE OR MORE ACRESDISTURBED AT ONE TIME.N/A4. DESCRIBE THE UNDISTURBED BUFFER ZONE TO BE USED (NOT LESS THAN 100 LINEAR FEET FROM THE SPECIAL WATER).N/A5. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL ENSURE THAT THE PRE AND POST PROJECT RUNOFF RATE AND VOLUME FROM THE 1, AND 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION EVENTS REMAINS THESAME.N/A6. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL MINIMIZE ANY INCREASE IN THE TEMPERATURE OF TROUT STREAM RECEIVING WATERS RESULTING IN THE 1, AND 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATIONEVENTS.N/A7. WETLANDS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE STORMWATER WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS TO A WETLAND (E.G., CONVERSION OF A NATURAL WETLAND TO A STORMWATER POND)? YESIF YES, DESCRIBE THE WETLAND MITIGATION SEQUENCE THAT WILL BE FOLLOWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART D OF APPENDIX A.SUMPS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED UPSTREAM OF THE DISCHARGE POINTS.INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (IV.E)DESCRIBE PROCEDURES TO ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE:·ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND·WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND WITHIN (7) DAYS AFTER THATINSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE STABILIZED AREAS, EROSION PREVENTION,AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND INFILTRATION AREAS.INSPECTOR WILL FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED ABOVE AND FILL OUT "ATTACHMENT B - CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST"1. Describe practices for storage of building products with a potential to leach pollutants to minimize exposure to stormwater:ALL BUILDING PRODUCTS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE2. Describe practices for storage of pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemical, and landscape materials:ALL LANDSCAPE TREATMENT CHEMICALS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZED EXPOSURE3. Describe practices for storage and disposal of hazardous materials or toxic waste (e.g., oil, fuel, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum-based products, wood preservative, additives, curing compounds, and acids) according to Minn. R. ch. 7045, includingrestricted access and secondary containment:ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS.4. Describe collection, storage and disposal of solid waste in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035:ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND SOLID WASTER WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS5. Describe management of portable toilets to prevent tipping and disposal of sanitary wastes in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7040:SANITARY AND SEPTIC SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED TO WORKERS WITH PORTABLE FACILITIES MAINTAINED AS NEEDED BY THE PROVIDER.6. Describe spill prevention and response for fueling and equipment or vehicle maintenance:EMPLOYEES WILL BE TRAINED IN TECHNIQUES DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE SPILLS. VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CHECKED FOR LEAKS.7. Describe containment and disposal of vehicle and equipment wash water and prohibiting engine degreasing on the site:ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES SHALL BE WASHED OFF SITE8. Describe storage and disposal of concrete and other washout wastes so that wastes do not contact the ground:ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR OFF SITE.FINAL STABILIZATION (IV.G)1. DESCRIBE METHOD OF FINAL STABILIZATION (PERMANENT COVER) OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS:FINAL STABILIZATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH PAVEMENT, SOD AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS.2. DESCRIBE PROCEDURES FOR COMPLETING FINAL STABILIZATION AND TERMINATING PERMIT COVERAGE (SEE PART IV.G.1-5):UPON STABILIZATION DESCRIBED ABOVE, THE CONTRCTOR AND OWNER SHALL MUTUALLY TRANSFER THE NPDES PERMIT TO THE NEXT OWNER WITH DOCUMENTS DESCRIBING THE NATURE OF TERMINATION PROCEDURE.DOCUMENTATION OF INFEASIBILITY: (IF APPLICABLE)SOILS INFORMATIONMAP UNITSYMBOL75BLUFFTON LOAMMAP UNIT NAME113WEBSTER LOAM123DUNDAS FINE SANDY LOAM544CATHRO MUCK
Civil Engineering Surveying Landscape Architecture4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200St. Louis Park, MN 55416civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060COPYRIGHT CIVIL SITE GROUP INC.cPROJECT
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
:
N
O
T
F
O
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
NISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTION............PROJECT NUMBER:1830112/13/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL12/23/20REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL1/5/20WATERSHED SUBMITTAL1/26/21....12/4/20CITY SUBMITTALDRAWN BY:REVIEWED BY:mp, ktmp, kt..............202044263Matthew R. PavekLICENSE NO.DATEI HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN,SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WASPREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECTSUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULYLICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERUNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OFMINNESOTA.12.13.20The Meadows at Hugo
Hugo, MN
6001 Glenwood Avenue, Golden Valley, MN 55422
Golden Valley Land CompanyCITY RESUBMITTALREVISION SUMMARYDATEDESCRIPTIONSW1.5SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS............ATTACHMENT B: SWPPP INSPECTION FORMATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMNOTE: THIS INSPECTION REPORT DOES NOT ADDRESS ALL ASPECTS OF THE NATIONAL APOLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT ISSUED ON AUGUST 1,2013. THE COMPLETION OF THIS CHECKLIST DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ARE IN COMPLIANCE; IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE(S) TO READ AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS.FACILITY INFORMATIONSITE NAME: THE MEADOWS AT HUGOFACILITY ADDRESS: HUGO, MNPERMIT NUMBER:CITY: HUGOSTATE: MNZIP CODE: 55038INSPECTION INFORMATIONINSPECTOR NAME: _______________________ PHONE NUMBER: _________________________DATE (MM/DD/YYYY): _____________________TIME: ____________ AM / PMIS THE INSPECTOR CERTIFIED IN SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL AND IS IT DOCUMENTED IN THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)?IS THIS INSPECTION ROUTINE OR IN RESPONSE TO A STORM EVENT:RAINFALL AMOUNT (IF APPLICABLE): ____________IS THE SITE WITHIN ONE AERIAL MILE OF A SPECIAL OR IMPARED WATER?IF YES, FOLLOW APPENDIX A AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTSNOTE: IF N/A IS SELECTED AT ANY TIME, SPECIFY WHY IN THE COMMENT AREA FOR THAT SECTION.EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENT (PART IV.B)1.SOIL STABILIZATION WHERE NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FOR 14 DAYS? (7 DAYS WHERE APPLICABLE)2.HAS THE NEED TO DISTURB STEEP SLOPES BEEN MINIMIZED?3.ALL DITCHES STABILIZED 200; BACK FROM POINT OF DISCHARGE WITHIN 24 HOURS? (NOT MULCH)4.ARE THERE BMP'S FOR ONSITE STOCKPILES?5.ARE APPROPRIATE BMP'S INSTALLED PROTECTING INLETS/OUTLETS?6.DO PIPE OUTLETS HAVE ENERGY DISSIPATION?COMMENTS:SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT (PART IV.C)1.PERIMETER CONTROL INSTALLED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS?2.PERIMETER CONTROL TRENCHED IN WHERE APPROPRIATE?3.50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER MAINTAINED AROUND ALL SURFACE WATERS?3.1.IF NO, HAVE REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS BEEN INSTALLED?4.INLET PROTECTION ON ALL CATCH BASINS AND CULVERT INLETS?5.VEHICLE TRACKING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AT ALL SITE EXITS?6.ALL TRACKED SEDIMENT REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS?7.ARE ALL INFILTRATION SYSTEMS STAKED AND MARKED TO AVOID COMPACTION?8.ARE ALL INFILTRATION AREAS PROTECTED WITH A PRETREATMENT DEVICE?9.DO ALL STOCKPILES HAVE PERIMETER CONTROLS?COMMENTS:MAINTENANCE-EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (PART IV.E.)1.ARE ALL PREVIOUSLY STABILIZED AREAS MAINTAINING 90% GROUND COVER?2.ANY DITCH EROSION OBSERVED?3.PERIMETER CONTROL--HAS SEDIMENT REACHED ONE HALF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE?4.ARE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES MAINTAINED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY?COMMENTS:OTHER1.ARE ALL MATERIALS THAT CAN LEACH POLLUTANTS UNDER COVER?2.HAS ACCESS BEEN RESTRICTED TO ONSITE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS?3.DOES ON-SITE FUELING ONLY OCCUR IN A CONTAINED AREA?4.ARE ALL SOLID WASTES BEING PROPERLY DISPOSED OF?5.IS THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA COMPLETELY CONTAINED?6.IS THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA MARKED WITH SIGN?COMMENTS:7.WERE ANY DISCHARGES SEEN DURING THIS INSPECTION, SEDIMENT, WATER, OR OTHERWISE?7.1.IF YES, STATE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL POINTS OF DISCHARGE. PHOTOGRAPH THE DISCHARGE AND DESCRIBE THE DISCHARGE (COLOR, ODOR, FOAM, OIL SHEEN, ETC). HOW WILL IT BE REMOVED? HOW DID THE DISCHARGEHAPPEN? HOW MUCH WAS DISCHARGED? HOW WILL IT BE STOPPED, AND HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE TO STOP? IS THE DISCHARGE GOING INTO AN ADJACENT SITE? WAS THE DISCHARGE A SEDIMENT DELTA? IF YES, WILL THE DELTA BERECOVERED WITHIN 7 DAYS?8.WILL A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BE UTILIZED IN THIS PROJECT AS REQUIRED AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART III.D OF THE PERMIT? DESCRIBE:9.IS ANY DEWATERING OCCURRING ON SITE?9.1.IF YES, WHERE? WHAT BMP IS BEING USED? HOW MUCH WATER IS BEING DEWATERED? IS THE WATER CLEAR? WHERE IS THE WATER BEING DISCHARGED TO?10.IS A COPY OF THE SWPPP LOCATED ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE?11.HAS THE SWPPP BEEN FOLLOWED AND IMPLEMENTED ON SITE?12.IS A SEDIMENTATION BASIN REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT AS SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT?12.1.IF YES, ARE THEY MAINTAINED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT?13.IS THE TOPSOIL ON THIS PROJECT BEING PRESERVED?13.1.IF YES, EXPLAIN HOW THE TOP SOIL IS BEING PRESERVED. IF NO, EXPLAIN WHY IT WAS INFEASIBLE.14.ARE ALL INFILTRATION SYSTEMS MARKED TO AVOID COMPACTION?14.1.DO ALL INFILTRATION AREAS HAVE PRETREATMENT DEVICES?15.DESCRIPTION OF AREAS OF NON-COMPLIANCE NOTED DURING THE INSPECTION, REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, AND RECOMMENDED DATE OF COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:16.PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP:17.POTENTIAL AREAS OF FUTURE CONCERN:18.ADDITIONAL COMMENTSDISCLOSURES:·AFTER DISCOVERY, THE PERMIT REQUIRES MANY OF THE DEFICIENCIES THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THIS CHECKLIST BE CORRECTED WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD OF TIME. SEE PERMIT FOR MORE DETAILS.·THIS INSPECTION CHECKLIST IS AN OPTION FOR SMALL CONSTRUCTION SITES. LARGE CONSTRUCTION SITES AND LINEAR PROJECTS REQUIRE MORE EXTENSIVE/MORE LOCATION SPECIFIC INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS.·THE PERMITTEE(S) IS/ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BMP'S AS WELL AS EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S UNTILANOTHER PERMITTEE HAS OBTAINED COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT ACCORDING TO PART II.B.5., OR THE PROJECT HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA.Y N N/AY N N/AY N N/AY N N/AY N N/AY N N/AY N N/AY N N/AATTACHMENT C - ABOVE-GROUNDFACILITY MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE1.ALL STORMWATER RETENTION, DETENTION AND TREATMENT BASINS MUST BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR TO DETERMINE THAT BASINRETENTION AND TREATMENT CHARACTERISTICS ARE ADEQUATE. A STORAGE TREATMENT BASIN WILL BE CONSIDERED INADEQUATE IF SEDIMENTHAS DECREASED THE WET STORAGE VOLUME BY 50 PERCENT OR DRY STORAGE VOLUME BY 25 PERCENT OF ITS ORIGINAL DESIGN VOLUME.BASED ON THIS INSPECTION, IF A STORMWATER BASIN REQUIRES SEDIMENT CLEANOUT, THE BASIN WILL BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL DESIGNCONTOURS AND VEGETATED STATE WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE INSPECTION DATE.2.ALL OUTLET STRUCTURES, CULVERTS, OUTFALL STRUCTURES AND OTHER STORMWATER FACILITIES FOR WHICH MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTSARE NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED HEREIN MUST BE INSPECTED IN THE SPRING, SUMMER AND FALL OF EACH YEAR. WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THEINSPECTION DATE, ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS MUST BE REMOVED SUCH THAT EACH STORMWATER FACILITY OPERATES ASDESIGNED AND PERMITTED. CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BE KEPT CLEAR OF LITTER AND VEGETATIVE DEBRIS, INFLOW PIPES ANDOVERFLOW SPILLWAYS KEPT CLEAR, INLET AREAS KEPT CLEAN, AND UNDESIRABLE VEGETATION REMOVED. EROSION IMPAIRING THE FUNCTIONOR INTEGRITY OF THE FACILITIES, IF ANY, WILL BE CORRECTED, AND ANY STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IMPAIRING OR THREATENING TO IMPAIR THEFUNCTION OF THE FACILITIES MUST BE REPAIRED.3.VOLUME CONTROL FACILITIES AND CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED EVERY THREE MONTHS DURING THE OPERATIONALPERIOD (BETWEEN SPRING SNOWMELT AND FIRST SUBSTANTIAL SNOWFALL) AND MONITORED AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS OF 1 INCH OR MORE TOENSURE THAT THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS CLEAR OF LITTER AND DEBRIS, INFLOW PIPES AND OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS ARE CLEAR, INLETAREAS ARE CLEAN, UNDESIRABLE VEGETATION IS REMOVED AND THERE IS NO EROSION IMPAIRING OR THREATENING TO IMPAIR THE FUNCTIONOF A FACILITY. IF SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED IN A INFILTRATION FEATURE, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF INSPECTION DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS MUST BEREMOVED, THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS MUST BE RESTORED, AND ANY SURFACE DISTURBANCE MUST BE STABILIZED.INSPECTION MUST ENSURE THAT SEDIMENT TRAPS AND FOREBAYS ARE TRAPPING SEDIMENT AND THAT MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF THESTORAGE VOLUME REMAINS, THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS STABLE (I.E., NO EROSION IS OBSERVED), AND INLETS ANDOUTLET/OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS ARE IN GOOD CONDITIONS WITH NO EROSION. MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES USED MUST PROTECT THEINFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE PRACTICE BY LIMITING SOIL COMPACTION TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE (E.G., BY USING LOW-IMPACTEARTH-MOVING EQUIPMENT).
CITY OF HUGO
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT
TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator
FROM: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director
SUBJECT: Construction Payment Request #5
Hugo Public Works Facility
Ebert Construction
DATE: For the City Council Meeting of March 1, 2021
BACKGROUND
Please find the enclosed application for payment for the City of Hugo Public Works
Facility project in the amount of $15,198.90. The quantities completed to date have
been reviewed and agreed upon by the architect, contractor and city staff.
The amount indicated above reflects the work certified through February of 2021, with a
5% retainage applied. Total retainage being held for the project to date is $56,021.40.
DESIRED ACTION
Staff recommends the City Council approve payment request #5 in the amount of
$15,198.90 to Ebert Construction.
ORDINANCE 2021-_____
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING HUGO CITY CODE, CHAPTER 90, ARTICLE VI,
SECTION 90-253 PARKING AND LOADING
THE CITY OF HUGO ORDAINS:
SECTION 1. Amend. The City Council of the City of Hugo does hereby amend Chapter 90,
Article VI, to amend Section 90-253, of the Hugo City Code pertaining to PROHIBITED
PARKING, PARKING RESTRICTIONS FOR VEHICLES AND TRAILERS (g)(1)(e) to state
the following:
e. Any vehicle parked in violation of these sections more than two times in any 30-day
period may be towed pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 169.041. Violation of this section shall constitute
a petty misdemeanor with a fine of $50.00.
SECTION 2. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be in full force and effect from and after its
adoption and publication according to law.
ADOPTED by the City Council this ____ day of ______________, 2021.
______________________________
Tom Weidt, Mayor
ATTEST:
_________________________________
Michele Lindau, City Clerk
February 24, 2021
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Hugo
14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North
Hugo, MN 55038
Re: 2021 Downtown Improvement Project
Public Hearing – Consider Ordering Improvements and Authorization to prepare plans
and specifications
City of Hugo, MN
WSB Project No. 015887-000
Dear Mayor and Council,
On July 20, 2020, City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility study for 2021
Downtown Improvements. Staff had completed the feasibility study and City Council had
accepted the study at its February 1, 2021 City Council meeting and called for a Public Hearing to
be held on March 1st, 2021.
Proposed improvements include street improvements and drainage improvements along the
following roadways:
147th Street from just west of TH 61 to Finale Avenue
The extension of 147th Street from Finale Avenue to Oneka Boulevard
Flay Avenue north of 147th Street to its existing termination point
Upper 146th Street from Finale Avenue to Fitzgerald Avenue
146th Street from Finale Avenue to Fitzgerald Avenue
Finley Avenue from Upper 146th Street to 145th Street
Fitzgerald Avenue from 147th Street to 145th Street
Oneka Parkway at 147th Street (intersection and turn lanes)
Funding for the project will be provided through assessments to benefiting properties, City Street
Funds, and the City’s Municipal State Aid Funds. The proposed funding is outlined on the
following page:
Honorable Mayor and City Council
February 24, 2021
Page 2
2021 Downtown Improvements
City of Hugo, MN
Project Funding
Improvements City Fund MSA Fund Assessments Total
Schedule A.
Surface Improvements $783,460.00 $1,317,300.00 $264,840.00 $2,365,600.00
Schedule B.
Watermain Improvements $227,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $227,000.00
Schedule C. Sanitary Sewer
Improvements $46,600.00 $0.00 $0.00 $46,600.00
Schedule D. Storm Sewer
Improvements $374,700.00 $459,600.00 $0.00 $834,300.00
Schedule E. Oneka Turn Lane
Improvements $0.00 $183,300.00 $0.00 $183,300.00
Total Improvements $1,431,760.00 $1,960,200.00 $264,840.00 $3,656,800.00
Staff will detail the proposed improvements and findings of the feasibility study with a PowerPoint
presentation for the public hearing.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution ordering the project and authorizing the preparation
of plans and specifications for the 2021 Downtown Improvement Project.
If you have any questions or items you wish to discuss, you can contact me at 651-286-8463.
Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Mark Erichson, PE
City Engineer
Attachment
cc: Bryan Bear, City Administrator, City of Hugo
Scott Anderson, Public Works Director, City of Hugo
Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician, City of Hugo
S:\Office_SHARED\Resolutions\2021 Resolutions\2021- Order Improvements for DT Road Project.docx
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PROJECT AND
AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE
2021 DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted July 20, 2020, a report was prepared by
WSB, with reference to the improvement of 147th Street from just west of TH 61 to Finale Avenue, 147th
Street from Finale Avenue to Oneka Parkway (new construction), Flay Avenue north of 147th Street to
its existing termination point, Upper 146th Street from Finale Avenue to Fitzgerald Avenue, 146th Street
from Finale Avenue to Fitzgerald Avenue, Finley Avenue from Upper 146th Street to 145th Street,
Fitzgerald Avenue from 147th Street to 146th Street, and Oneka Parkway at 147th Street (intersection and
turn lanes); and
WHEREAS, it is proposed to construct the new section of 147th Street and reconstruct the existing
roadways, adding concrete curb and gutter, drainage/storm sewer improvements, minor subgrade
corrections, bituminous paving, trail addition along 147th Street, and intersection and turn lane
improvements to Oneka Parkway at 147th Street; and
WHEREAS, the City intends to assess benefited properties for all or a portion of the aforementioned
improvements, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has received and accepted the feasibility report prepared by the City
Engineer on February 1, 2021, for the 2021 Downtown Improvements; and
WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted on the February 1, 2021, fixed a date for the
Council public hearing on the proposed improvements; and
WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice in advance of said public hearing
was given and the hearing was held thereon on the March 1, 2021, at which time all persons desiring to
be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO:
1. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report
for the 2021 Downtown Improvements.
2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in this Council resolution adopted March 1,
2021.
3. The improvements described in the notice of public hearing and the feasibility report are hereby
designated and shall be known as the 2021 Downtown Improvement Project.
4. The City Council shall authorize WSB to prepare plans and specifications of said improvements.
5. The City Council shall let the contract for all or part of the work for said improvements or order
all or part of the work done by day labor or otherwise as authorized by Minnesota Statutes,
Section 429.041, Subdivision 2 within one year of the date of this Resolution ordering said
improvements.
Council members voting AYE:
Council members voting NAY:
S:\Office_SHARED\Resolutions\2021 Resolutions\2021- Order Improvements for DT Road Project.docx
Whereupon said resolution was declared passed and adopted this 1st day of March 2021.
________________________
Tom Weidt, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Michele Lindau, City Clerk
Memorandum – City of Hugo 701 XENIA AVENUE S | SUITE 300 | MINNEAPOLIS, MN | 55416 | 763.541.4800 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum
To: Bryan Bear
City Administrator
From: Mark A. Erichson, WSB & Associates
Date: February 24, 2021
Re: WSB Project No. 15887-00
As previously directed, staff developed preliminary design as part of the feasibility study
preparation for the 2021 Downtown Improvement Project. During this effort, staff identified
permanent and temporary easements required for this project.
Easement acquisition needs have been identified along 147th Street and Fitzgerald Avenue. Staff
has met with property owners regarding the project, provided them with renderings of the
proposed improvements, and discussed potential concerns.
On behalf of WSB & Associates, I am requesting that the City Council approve a resolution
authorizing the offer presentation on the parcels to the property owners and to acquire the
property areas needed either by negotiation or condemnation for the Downtown Redevelopment
Project.
Par. PID Property Owner Total Appraised Value
1 2003121220002 The Church of St. Genevieve $14,200.00
3 2003121210001 Mary E. Gerdesmeier $36,900.00
4 2003121210030 Robert L. and Frances D. Shields $26,300.00
5 2003121210029 Granger & Granger, LLP $14,000.00
7 2003121240011 Glenn F. and Marie A. Jansen $1,700.00
8 2003121240071 Steven J. Bernier $400.00
9 2003121240008
2003121240007 Michael J. Quinn $2,100.00
11 2003121240010 Eric J. Larson $550.00
12 2003121240017
2003121240014 Peter C. and Brenda L. Rainer $750.00
13 2003121240021 Joseph T. Marier $250.00
14 2003121240066 Joseph T. Marier $850.00
15 2003121230031 Mike Mireault $450.00
16 2003121230021 Steven J. Marier $450.00
Total Compensation: $98,900.00
February 24, 2021
Page 2
C:\Users\michele.lindau\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\PD3H9O
9W\Memorandum - Hugo_Downtown Redevelopment Project.docx
The amounts listed above for parcels 1-9 are based upon appraisal reports prepared by Valbridge
Property Advisors and reviewed and certified by Kelly Lindstrom, General Appraiser. Parcels 11-
16 valuations were determined by Minimum Damage Acquisition reports completed by WSB and
are based upon site visits, research of comparable sales in the area, and tax value/market
research.
Parcels 1 ,3 4, 5 and 9 have both temporary and permanent easement acquisitions. Parcels 7,8,
11, 12, 13, 14, 15 and 16 have only temporary easement acquisitions to facilitate construction
where existing right of way is limited.
RESOLUTION NO. _______
CITY OF HUGO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING NEGOTIATIONS AND/OR EMINENT DOMAIN TO AQUIRE THE PROPERTY
AREAS NEEDED FOR THE DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, The City of Hugo has initiated the Downtown Improvement Project (the Project), including
reconstruction of 147th; reconstruction of Fitzgerald; street and utility construction; new pedestrian facilities; and
WHEREAS, the construction schedule for the Project contemplates that the Project will be completed during the
2021‐2022 construction season; and
WHEREAS, it is necessary that the City obtain title and possession of the areas identified in Exhibit A for the parcels
as shown below:
Par. PID Property Owner Total Appraised Value
1 2003121220002 The Church of St. Genevieve $14,200.00
3 2003121210001 Mary E. Gerdesmeier $36,900.00
4 2003121210030 Robert L. and Frances D. Shields $26,300.00
5 2003121210029 Granger & Granger, LLP $14,000.00
7 2003121240011 Glenn F. and Marie A. Jansen $1,700.00
8 2003121240071 Steven J. Bernier $400.00
9 2003121240008
2003121240007 Michael J. Quinn $2,100.00
11 2003121240010 Eric J. Larson $550.00
12 2003121240017
2003121240014 Peter C. and Brenda L. Rainer $750.00
13 2003121240021 Joseph T. Marier $250.00
14 2003121240066 Joseph T. Marier $850.00
15 2003121230031 Mike Mireault $450.00
16 2003121230021 Steven J. Marier $450.00
by negotiation and/or eminent domain for the necessary easements to allow for the construction of the project;
and
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY HUGO, MINNESOTA: acquisition is hereby
authorized as follows:
1. Offers shall be made for the necessary easements for the parcels identified in Exhibit A, pursuant to
Minnesota Statute 117.036.
2. If negotiation does not result in the in the prompt acquisition of the easements, staff is authorized and
directed without further action from the City Council to proceed with eminent domain pursuant to MN
State Statute 117 et. Seq. while continuing to work towards a negotiated settlement.
3. Pursuant to Minnesota Statute 117.042, 117.043, it is necessary that the City acquire title and possession
prior to filing of an award and so the City shall proceed with “Quick‐Take” acquisition as to all parcels and
the City shall pay to the Owner or deposit with the Court an amount equal to the City’s approved
appraisal value.103
This resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Hugo on the day of February, 2021, by
a vote of Ayes and Nays
__________________________
, Mayor
ATTEST:
_____________________________________
, City Clerk
Exhibit A
Location: City of Hugo
Address: Unassigned
PID No: 20‐031‐21‐22‐0002
WSB Project No: 015887‐000
Date: January 20, 2021
Description of Permanent Roadway Easement
A permanent easement for roadway purposes over, under, and across that part of the Northwest
1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 20, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County,
Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section
20; thence South 89 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds West, assumed bearing along the south line
thereof, 30.00 feet to the west line of the east 30.00 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest
1/4 of said Section 20, also being the point of beginning; thence continuing South 89 degrees 54
minutes 43 seconds West, along said south line, 157.60 feet; thence North 82 degrees 16
minutes 38 seconds East, 116.09 feet; thence North 89 degrees 50 minutes 54 seconds East,
42.69 feet to said west line of the east 30.00 feet; thence South 00 degrees 28 minutes 14
seconds West, along said west line of the east 30.00 feet, 15.47 feet to the point of beginning.
Description of Temporary Construction Easement
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across that part of the Northwest
1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 20, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County,
Minnesota, described as follows:
Commencing at the southeast corner of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section
20; thence South 89 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds West, assumed bearing along the south line
thereof, 187.60 feet to the point of beginning; thence North 82 degrees 16 minutes 38 seconds
East, 116.09 feet; thence North 89 degrees 50 minutes 54 seconds East, 42.69 feet to the west
line of the east 30.00 feet of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 20; thence
North 00 degrees 28 minutes 14 seconds East, along said east line, 5.00 feet; thence South 89
degrees 50 minutes 54 seconds West, 43.08 feet; thence South 82 degrees 16 minutes 38
seconds West, 153.72 feet to said south line; thence North 89 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds
East, along said south line, 37.63 feet to the point of beginning.
Location: City of Hugo
Address: 5558 147th St N
PID No: 20‐031‐21‐21‐0001
WSB Project No: 015887‐000
Date: January 19, 2021
Description of Permanent Roadway Easement
A permanent easement for roadway purposes over, under, and across the south 15.75 feet of the
following described property:
That certain part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, Section 20, Township 31, North of
Range 21 West of the Fourth Meridian, described as follows, to ‐wit:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4, thence North along
the West line thereof, for 150 feet; thence East, parallel with the South line of said Northeast
1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 for 75 feet; thence South parallel with described first course, for 150
feet to the South line of said Northeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4; thence West along said South line
for 75 feet to the point of beginning. According to the United States Government Survey
thereof.
Description of Temporary Construction Easement
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across the north 5.00 feet of the
south 20.75 feet of the following described property:
That certain part of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4, Section 20, Township 31, North of
Range 21 West of the Fourth Meridian, described as follows, to ‐wit:
Beginning at the Southwest corner of said Northeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4, thence North along
the West line thereof, for 150 feet; thence East, parallel with the South line of said Northeast
1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 for 75 feet; thence South parallel with described first course, for 150
feet to the South line of said Northeast 1/4 of Northwest 1/4; thence West along said South line
for 75 feet to the point of beginning. According to the United States Government Survey
thereof.
Location: City of Hugo
Address: 14470 Flay Ave N
PID No: 20‐031‐21‐21‐0030
WSB Project No: 015887‐000
Date: January 19, 2021
Description of Permanent Roadway Easement
A permanent easement for roadway purposes over, under, and across the south 15.75 feet of the
following described property:
Lot Six (6), Granger’s Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of
the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota.
Description of Temporary Construction Easement
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across the north 5.00 feet of the
south 20.75 feet of the following described property:
Lot Six (6), Granger’s Addition, according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of
the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota.
Location: City of Hugo
Address: 5616 147th St N
PID No: 20‐031‐21‐21‐0029
WSB Project No: 015887‐000
Date: January 19, 2021
Description of Permanent Roadway Easement
A permanent easement for roadway purposes over, under, and across the following described
property:
Lot 5, Granger’s Addition, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the
Washington County Recorder.
Said permanent easement lies southerly of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 5, distant 22.74 feet northerly, as measured
along said west line, from the southwest corner thereof; thence northeasterly to a point on the
east line of said Lot 5, distant 46.83 feet northerly, as measured along said east line, from the
southeast corner thereof and there terminating.
EXCEPT that part which lies within the public roadway and utility easement as reserved in Doc.
No. 3739896 and described as follows:
That part of Lot 5, Granger’s Addition, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in
the office of the Washington County Recorder.
Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 5, distant 14.29 feet north of the southwest
corner of said Lot 5 as measured along said west line; thence northeasterly, to a point on
the east line of said Lot 5, distant 36.11 feet north of the southeast corner of said Lot 5 as
measured along said east line, and said line there terminating.
Description of Temporary Construction Easement
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across the following described
property:
Lot 5, Granger’s Addition, according to the plat thereof on file or of record in the office of the
Washington County Recorder.
Said permanent easement lies southerly of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 5, distant 27.80 feet northerly, as measured
along said west line, from the southwest corner thereof; thence northeasterly to a point on the
east line of said Lot 5, distant 52.16 feet northerly, as measured along said east line, from the
southeast corner thereof and there terminating.
EXCEPT that part lying southerly of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the west line of said Lot 5, distant 22.74 feet northerly, as measured
along said west line, from the southwest corner thereof; thence northeasterly to a point on
the east line of said Lot 5, distant 46.83 feet northerly, as measured along said east line,
from the southeast corner thereof and there terminating.
Location: City of Hugo
Address: 5601 147th St N
PID No: 20‐031‐21‐24‐0011
WSB Project No: 015887‐000
Date: January 19, 2021
Description of Temporary Construction Easement
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across the north 5.00 feet of the
following described property:
All that part of Lot Two (2), County Auditor’s Plat No. 7, Washington County, Minnesota
described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot Two (2), thence South thirty (30) feet, thence
North eighty‐nine degrees thirty‐three minutes East (N 89° 33’ E) two hundred (200) feet to the
point of beginning of the land to be described, (herein referred to as Point A); thence continuing
North eighty‐nine degrees thirty‐three minutes East (N 89° 33’ E) and parallel to the North line
of said Lot Two (2), for a distance of one hundred (100) feet; thence South and parallel to the
West line of Lot Two (2), for a distance of one hundred and fifty (150) feet; thence South eighty‐
nine degrees thirty‐three minutes West (S 89° 33’ W) and parallel to the North line of Lot Two
(2), for a distance of one hundred (100) feet; thence North and parallel to the West line of Lot
Two (2), for a distance of one hundred and fifty (150) feet to Point A and there terminating,
according to the plat thereof on file and of record in the office of the Register of Deeds within
and for said County.
Location: City of Hugo
Address: 5583 147th St N
PID No: 20‐031‐21‐24‐0071
WSB Project No: 015887‐000
Date: January 19, 2021
Description of Temporary Construction Easement
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across the north 5.00 feet of the
following described property:
All that part of Lot 2, County Auditor’s Plat No. 7, Hugo, Washington County, Minnesota and
described as follows, to‐wit:
Beginning at a point in said Lot 2, 30 feet south and 150 feet north 89 degrees 33 minutes east
of the northwest corner of said Lot 2; thence continuing north 89 degrees 33 minutes east and
parallel to the north line of said Lot 2 for 50 feet; thence south and parallel to the west line of
Lot 2 for 150 feet; thence south 89 degrees 33 minutes west and parallel to the north line of Lot
2 for 50 feet; thence north and parallel to the west line of Lot 2 for 150 feet to the place of
beginning and comprising .17 of an acre. ALSO, all that part of Lot 2, County Auditor’s Plat No.
7, Hugo, Washington County, Minnesota described as follows: Commencing at a point on the
west line of said Lot 2, 30 feet south of the northwest corner thereof; thence north 89 degrees
33 minutes east parallel with the north line of Lot 2 for 150 feet to the point of beginning of the
property herein conveyed; thence south 100 feet; thence south 89 degrees 33 minutes west, 10
feet; thence parallel to the first course for 100 feet; thence east 89 degrees 33 minutes east for
10 feet to the point of beginning, Washington County, Minnesota.
Location: City of Hugo
Address: 14739 Flay Ae N
PID No: 20‐031‐21‐24‐0007 and 20‐031‐21‐24‐0008
WSB Project No: 015887‐000
Date: January 19, 2021
Description of Permanent Roadway Easement
A permanent easement for roadway purposes over, under, and across the following described
property:
That part of Lot 2, County Auditor’s Plat No. 7, described as:
Beginning at a point on the West line of said Lot 2, 30 feet South of the Northwest corner
thereof; thence North 89 degrees 33 minutes East parallel with the North line of said Lot 2 for
140 feet; thence South 100 feet; thence South 89 degrees 33 minutes West for 140 feet to the
West line of said Lot 2, thence North along said West line for 100 feet to the point of beginning,
Washington County, Minnesota.
Said permanent easement lies northwesterly of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the west line of the above described property distant 8.23 feet
southerly, as measured along said west line, from the northwest corner thereof; thence
northeasterly to a point on the north line of the above described property distant 7.06 feet
easterly, as measured along said north line, from the northwest corner thereof and there
terminating.
Description of Temporary Construction Easement
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across the following described
property:
That part of Lot 2, County Auditor’s Plat No. 7, described as:
Beginning at a point on the West line of said Lot 2, 30 feet South of the Northwest corner
thereof; thence North 89 degrees 33 minutes East parallel with the North line of said Lot 2 for
140 feet; thence South 100 feet; thence South 89 degrees 33 minutes West for 140 feet to the
West line of said Lot 2, thence North along said West line for 100 feet to the point of beginning,
Washington County, Minnesota.
Said temporary easement lies northwesterly of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the west line of the above described property distant 12.86 feet
southerly, as measured along said west line, from the northwest corner thereof; thence
northeasterly to a point on the north line of the above described property distant 11.03 feet
easterly, as measured along said north line, from the northwest corner thereof and there
terminating.
EXCEPT that part lying northwesterly of the following described line:
Beginning at a point on the west line of the above described property distant 8.23 feet
southerly, as measured along said west line, from the northwest corner thereof; thence
northeasterly to a point on the north line of the above described property distant 7.06 feet
easterly, as measured along said north line, from the northwest corner thereof and there
terminating.
AND
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across the north 5.00 feet and
the west 5.00 feet of the above described property EXCEPT that part lying northwesterly of the
following described line:
Beginning at a point on the west line of the above described property distant 12.86 feet
southerly, as measured along said west line, from the northwest corner thereof; thence
northeasterly to a point on the north line of the above described property distant 11.03 feet
easterly, as measured along said north line, from the northwest corner thereof and there
terminating.
Location: City of Hugo
Address: 14719 Fitzgerald Ave N
PID No: 20‐031‐21‐24‐0010
WSB Project No: 015887‐000
Date: January 19, 2021
Description of Temporary Construction Easement
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across the west 5.00 feet of the
following described property:
That part of Lot 2, County Auditor’s Plat No. 7, described as follows, to‐wit:
Beginning at a point on the West line of said Lot 2 a distance of 130 feet South to the Northwest
corner of said Lot 2, thence North 89 degrees 33 minutes East and parallel with the North line of
said Lot 2 a distance of 150 feet; thence South and parallel with the West line of said Lot 2 a
distance of 110 feet; thence South 89 degrees 33 minutes West and parallel with the North line
of said Lot 2 a distance of 150 feet to the West line of said Lot 2; thence North along the West
line of said Lot 2 a distance of 110 feet to the point of beginning, Washington County,
Minnesota.
Location: City of Hugo
Address: 14683 Fitzgerald Ave N
PID No: 20‐031‐21‐24‐0014 and 20‐031‐21‐24‐0017
WSB Project No: 015887‐000
Date: January 19, 2021
Description of Temporary Construction Easement
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across the west 5.00 feet of the
following described property:
That part of Lot Two (2), County Auditor’s Plat No. 7, Hugo, Washington County, Minnesota,
described as follows, to‐wit:
Beginning at a point on the West line of said Lot Two (2), said point being 315 feet South of the
Northwest corner thereof; thence continuing South along the West line a distance of 75 feet to
a point; thence North 89° 33’ East and parallel to the North line of said Lot 2 a distance of 293.5
feet more or less to the Westerly edge of the Northern Pacific Railroad right‐of‐way; thence
Northerly along the said right‐of‐way to a point 309.6 feet more or less East of the point of
beginning herein on a line which is parallel with the North line of said Lot 2; thence South 89°
33’ West and parallel to the North line of said Lot 2 a distance of 309.6 feet more or less to the
point of beginning.
AND
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across the west 5.00 feet of the
following described property:
All that part of Lot No. 2, of County Auditor Plat No. 7, in the Village of Hugo, Minnesota,
described as follows:
Commencing at the Northwest corner of said Lot No. 2, of County Auditor Plat No. 7, in the
Village of Hugo, Minnesota; thence South along the West line of said Lot No. 2 for 240 feet to
the point of beginning of this description; thence North 89° 33’ East for 327.6 feet more or less
to the Westerly right‐of‐way line of the Northern Pacific Railway Company; thence Southerly
along said Westerly right‐of way line for 76.7 feet; thence South 89° 33’ West for 312.6 feet
more or less to said Westerly line of Lot No. 2; thence North along said West line of Lot No. 2 for
75 feet to the point of beginning.
Location: City of Hugo
Address: 14609 Fitzgerald Ave N
PID No: 20‐031‐21‐24‐0021
WSB Project No: 015887‐000
Date: January 19, 2021
Description of Temporary Construction Easement
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across the west 3.00 feet of the
following described property:
That part of the North 157 feet of Lots 3 and 4, County Auditor’s Plat No. 7, lying South of the
North 80 feet, except that part described on a Quit Claim Deed recorded in 192 Deeds 475, said
exception described as follows:
Commencing at the NW corner of Lot 3, County Auditor’s Plat No. 7; thence running in a S’ly
direction along the W’ly line of said Lot 3 a distance of 157 feet to a point; thence running in an
E’ly direction and parallel with the N’ly line of Lots 3 and 4 a distance of 120 feet to the point of
beginning of the land to be described; thence running in a N’ly direction and parallel with the
W’ly line of said Lot 3 a distance of 30 feet to a point; thence running in an E’ly direction and
parallel with the N’ly line of said Lots 3 and 4 to a point on the E’ly line of said Lot 4; thence
running in a S’ly direction along the E’ly line of said Lot 4 to a point which is the SE corer of said
Lot 4 and the NE corner of Lot 1, Block 10 of Hugo; thence running in a W’ly direction and
parallel with the N’ly line of said Lots 3 and 4 to the point of beginning of the land herein
described.
Location: City of Hugo
Address: 5558 146th St N
PID No: 20‐031‐21‐24‐0066
WSB Project No: 015887‐000
Date: January 19, 2021
Description of Temporary Construction Easement
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across the west 3.00 feet of the
following described property:
Lot Four (4), of Block Ten (10), Village of Hugo, according to the plat thereof on file and of record
in the office of the Registrar of Deeds in and for said County and State.
Location: City of Hugo
Address: 14590 Fitzgerald Ave N
PID No: 20‐031‐21‐23‐0031
WSB Project No: 015887‐000
Date: January 19, 2021
Description of Temporary Construction Easement
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across the east 3.00 feet of the
following described property:
The East 1/2 of Lot 11, Lot 12, Block 5, Hugo, Washington County, Minnesota.
Location: City of Hugo
Address: 14624 Fitzgerald Ave N
PID No: 20‐031‐21‐23‐0021
WSB Project No: 015887‐000
Date: January 19, 2021
Description of Temporary Construction Easement
A temporary easement for construction purposes over, under, and across the east 3.00 feet of the
following described property:
Lot One (1), Block Five (5) of Hugo, Washington County, Minnesota, according to the plat
thereof on file and of record in the office of the Registrar of Deeds, Washington County,
Minnesota.
February 24, 2021 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: 2021 Downtown Improvement Project – 147th Street Local Roads Improvement Program Solicitation City of Hugo, MN WSB Project No. 015887-000 Dear Mayor and Council, The Local Roads Improvement Program (LRIP) was established by the Minnesota Legislature in 2002. The legislature recently provided $75,000,000 for LRIP for county, state aid cities, non-state aid cities, and townships. There are three main areas where funds are granted, one of which is Routes of Regional Significance where funds can be used for constructing or reconstructing city streets, county highways, or town roads with statewide or regional significance. Staff believes that the reconstruction and extension of 147th Street is good candidate project to apply for these LRIP funds. Our application is seeking the maximum request value of $1,250,000. It should be noted that the LRIP provides funds for capital construction costs only. Staff has requested and received a letter of support from Washington County for our Local Road Improvement Program Application for 147th Street. The grant application is due on March 3, 2021, with the announcement of award of funds occurring in May of 2021. Award of our 20121 Downtown Improvement Project contract cannot occur until after the selection process has occurred. Staff recommends approval of the resolution authorizing submission of Local Road Improvement Program Grant Application for 147th Street Reconstruction and Extension to Oneka Parkway as part of the 2021 Downtown Improvement Project. If you have any questions or items you wish to discuss, you can contact me at 651-286-8463. Sincerely,
WSB & Associates, Inc.
Mark Erichson, PE City Engineer
Honorable Mayor and City Council
February 24, 2021
Page 2
cc: Bryan Bear, City Administrator, City of Hugo Rachel Juba, Community Development Director, City of Hugo Scott Anderson, Public Works Director, City of Hugo Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician, City of Hugo
RESOLUTION #XXXXX
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING SUBMISSION OF LOCAL ROAD
IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (LRIP) GRANT APPLICATION FOR 147th
STREET RECONSTRUCTION AND EXTENSION TO ONEKA PARKWAY AS
PART OF THE 2021 DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
WHEREAS, the project consists of reconstructing approximately 1,300 feet of Municipal
State Aid Street (MSAS) 104/147th Street– from US 61/Forest Boulevard to
approximately 160 feet west of Finale Avenue— and extending the current western limit
of 147th Street to connect to Oneka Parkway, and;
WHEREAS, MSAS 104/147th Street is an east-west local roadway that provides access to
Lions Park, a community park that is currently in the process of expansion to include new
recreational facilities and space, Saint John Baptist Cemetery, and residences, and;
WHEREAS, MSAS 104/147th Street has an average daily traffic (ADT) of 400 and
attracts high volume of pedestrian and bicycle traffic due to the access it provides to
Lions Park and Harwood Creek Trail – a continuous north-south trail that runs through
Washington and Chisago County, and;
WHEREAS, the proposed project would improve pavement conditions on existing
MSAS 147th Street, provide continuous trail connectivity to the Hardwood Creek
Regional Trail as well as trails on Oneka Parkway and CSAH 8, and accommodate future
traffic volumes, and;
WHEREAS, the roadway reconstruction project is consistent with the City of Hugo 2040
Comprehensive Plan where 147th street is identified as a future major collector road and
would support existing and planned developments in the area, and;
WHEREAS, the Local Road Improvement Program (LRIP), administered by the
Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), has made available $75,000,000 in
total funds, with a maximum award amount of $1,250,000, to fund capital construction
costs for projects that meet the program criteria, and;
WHEREAS, MSAS 104/147th Street serves connections to regional and community
destinations and facilities, will serve as a future reliever route to CSAH 8, and connects
to US 61, and is therefore a Route of Regional Significance, and;
WHEREAS, the proposed roadway improvement project meets the requirements of
LRIP, therefore eligible to receive LRIP grant funding, and;
WHEREAS, the City of Hugo has the ability to cover costs associated with the roadway
improvement project not covered by the grant award, and;
WHEREAS, the City of Hugo agrees to comply with all applicable laws and regulations
as stated in the grant agreement; and
WHEREAS, the City of Hugo has the necessary capabilities to adequately develop,
implement, manage, and maintain this public improvement project.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
HUGO, THAT:
1. The City Council hereby supports the reconstruction of the existing MSAS
104/147th Street which includes a multiuse trail on the northside of MSAS
104/147th Street and its extension to Oneka Parkway.
2. The City Council hereby supports the City’s submission of a Local Road
Improvement Program application and authorizes WSB & Associates, Inc. to
prepare and submit said application.
3. The City Council hereby provides assurance that the City of Hugo will pay all
costs associated with the reconstruction project and ensure that all aspects of the
LRIP funding requirements are met.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO this
1st day of March, 2021.
__________________________________
Tom Weidt, Mayor
ATTEST:
__________________________________
Michele Lindau, City Clerk
CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION
STAFF REPORT
TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator
FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Drengson May Enterprises, LLC. – Sketch Plan for the property located
West of Falcon Avenue North and North of 121st Street North.
DATE: February 25, 2021, for the City Council Meeting of March 1, 2021
ZONING: Large Lot Single-Family Residential (R-1)
LAND USE: Very Low Density Residential (VLD)
120-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: April 22, 2021
1. PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE:
At its February 11, 2021, meeting the Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan and
provided comments to the applicant. There were a few comment letters provided to the Planning
Commission from neighboring property owners. The letters are a little out of date since the
applicant did change their plans before the Planning Commission meeting to comply with all of
the R-1 zoning district regulations. The Planning Commission generally thought that the layout
of the development was in character with the surrounding neighborhood. They stated that the
variance for the lot to the west seemed reasonable because of the unique shape and access points
of the property. The Planning Commission discussed the road and utility construction that is
required for development of the property and stated that since there is some interest from
adjacent property owners for connection to sewer that a neighborhood meeting should be held.
2. BACKGROUND:
The properties are generally located west of Falcon Avenue North and north of 121st Street
North. There are three properties that total approximately 15 acres. The two properties to the
east are currently vacant, relatively flat, and there is a wetland on the west side of the properties.
The west 5.36 acre parcel has a house that would remain on its own lot, and will create two new
lots. The applicant would like to receive feedback on the project in regards to general layout,
proposed variance request, and road and utility construction.
J.1
3. SKETCH PLAN:
The applicant is planning to subdivide the three parcels of land to create parcels that are 1 acre or
more. The plan shows 10 proposed residential lots, stormwater ponding areas, streets, and
utilities. The sketch plan was completed to get comments from the Planning Commission and
City Council prior to moving forward with the formal development approval process.
Zoning and Regulations
The three parcels are located in the Large Lot Single-Family Residential (R-1) zoning district.
The minimum lot size is 1 acre for subdivisions in the zoning district. The applicant intends to
comply with all of the zoning district regulations for the district, except for Lots 8 and 9, where
they would need to ask for a variance for the lot widths. The lot widths are proposed to be
approximately 30 feet, where 150 feet is required by ordinance. Lots 8 and 9 cannot be easily
integrated in to the proposed lots on the cul-de-sac due to the Metropolitan Council sewer line
easement and a wetland complex that divides the three parcels.
The property that is proposed for the creation of Lots 8, 9, and 10 is 5.36 acres and can be
subdivided, therefore it is a reasonable request. However the shape of the property is unique in
that has three separate access points to public streets, two on Everton Avenue North and one on
121st Street North. Besides the access point for the existing house that will remain, the other
access points do not meet the minimum lot width requirements. The property has been this shape
for several decades and staff did not find any information on how it became this way. There are
other properties in the area that do not meet the lot width requirements for the zoning district and
the proposed variance would not noticeably change the character of the area. The applicant is
also working with the property owner located at 4898 121st Street North to adjust the property
lines to widen the access point on 121st Street.
A portion of the property is located within the Shoreland Overlay District and shall meet all the
regulations. The sketch plan as shown meets the shoreland regulations.
Utilities
Development of the site requires connections to municipal utilities. Sanitary sewer service is
available in the middle of the site via the Met Council sewer interceptor. Water service is
available within 700 feet to the west on Everton Avenue North. The utilities would need to be
extended to the property and to the property boundaries.
The utilities would need to be extended past several properties that are not included in the in the
sketch plan. The applicant has been meeting with the surrounding property owners and has
indicated that some of the property owners are interested in connecting to municipal sewer
and/or water if they were to become available, with possible assessments. In this case, the
construction cost would be paid with assessments. Staff is recommending an informational
meeting be held with the neighborhood to discuss what a public improvement project would look
like and to gage interest from adjacent properties.
Streets & Access
The property is located along 121st Street North, which is a gravel roadway. The existing house
located on Lot 10 is proposed to continue to have its driveway connection to Everton Avenue
North, as well as the the proposed house to be located on Lot 8. Lot 9 is proposed to have a
connection to 121st Street North. Lots 1-7 will be located on the new public street and shall be an
urban-section paved roadway with curb and gutter, with access to 121st Street.
121st Street North is currently a rural-section roadway with a gravel surface. Staff recommends
that the entire length of the street, from Everton Avenue to Falcon Avenue, be paved. A rural-
section paved roadway should be sufficient in this case.
Grading/Drainage
Wetlands: The site contains 1.48 acres of wetlands. The applicant is not proposing to impact the
wetlands. A wetland delineation has been approved by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP).
Site Grading/Low Floor Elevations: The development contains a 1.48 acre wetland in the middle
of the site. The applicant will need to verify the 100-year high water level of the wetland. Currently
the proposed building elevations are required to be at three feet above the 100-year high water
level. The low floor elevation is required to be four feet above the floodplain elevation and three
feet above any known groundwater. Staff will continue to work with the applicant on this, if the
development moves forward.
Ground Water Impacts: The groundwater within the site is likely relatively high which may
require additional analysis before finalizing the grading plan and low floor elevations. Soil boring
will be required to determine the ground water elevation.
Storm Water Management: The developer is proposing to have a stormwater management plan
through the construction of ponds within the site. The property and area surrounding the property
has some drainage issues. The stormwater management on the site should be evaluated to help
solve the drainage issues. This might mean the relocation of the proposed stormwater pond as
shown on site. Staff will be working with the developer, as this projects moves forward, as it relates
to drainage and stormwater management.
Staff recommends that the applicant evaluate the potential of using stormwater, for irrigation
purposes, within the development. If the system is feasible, from a water availability and design
standpoint, it will require additional review and analysis as the project moves forward.
Park Dedication
The property is served by Oak Shore Park and Bald Eagle-Otter Lake Regional Park. The
applicant will be required to pay park dedication fee of $2,400 per new unit which totals
$16,800. There are 3 existing lots, so 7 of the lots are considered in the total. At its February 17,
2021, meeting the Parks Commission stated that the dedication fee in lieu land dedication was
acceptable.
4. CONCLUSION/ RECOMMENDATIONS:
Staff recommends that the City Council provide feedback on the sketch plan to the applicant on
the following:
1. General Layout
2. Proposed Variance Request for Lots 8 and 9
3. Road Construction
Staff is recommending an informational meeting be held with the neighborhood to discuss what a public improvement project would look like and to gage interest from adjacent properties.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Site Map
2. Engineer’s Memo
3. Applicants Narrative
4. Sketch Plan Documents
5. Comments from Adjacent Property Owners
120th Street North Falcon Avenue North121st Street NorthEverton Avenue North124th Street North
Everton Circle NorthEuropa Avenue NorthForest Boulevard North124th Street Court North121st Street Sketch Plan
Location MapHugo, MN
Roads
Hugo Border
Parcel Boundary
¯0 250Feet1 in = 250 feet Document Path: S:\Mapping\Emily\LocationSite Maps\2021\Drengson 121st.mxdSite
C:\Users\rachel.juba\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\O7PY7DSU\LTR-r juba-Drengson Sketch Plan - 20210205 (002).docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM February 5, 2021 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Drengson Sketch Plan Review (4990 121st Street North) WSB Project No. 016315-000 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the sketch plan for the Drengson Property as prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. Based on the review of the documents, we offer the following comments related to this application:
General/Access
1. The subject property is located on the north side of 121st Street between Everton Avenue North and Falcon Avenue North. Access to the site will come from 121st Street, which is a gravel surfaced roadway. 2. With subdivision of property on gravel roadways such as this, the applicant will need to pave the existing roadway from Falcon Avenue to Everton Avenue (approximately 1,500 feet), but not be required to bring the roadway to an urban section with curb and gutter and storm sewer. The roadway can remain a rural section roadway. 3. Properties to the north, east, and west do not require access to be provided from this development, therefore other street connections are not a consideration.
Utility Plan 4. Watermain is available to the 121st Street corridor and Drengson Property via the existing watermain located within Everton Avenue. The applicant would need to extend watermain to their east plat line and into their subdivision at their proposed street entrance. 5. Sanitary Sewer Service is available to serve the property as well as other properties within the 121st Street corridor from the MCES 42” Interceptor the extends along the Drengson’s west property line. The applicant would need to extend an 8” sanitary sewer within 121st Street into their development and to their east plat line. 6. Other property owners have expressed interest in receiving sewer and/or water service as well. Staff is recommending an informational meeting be held to discuss what a public improvement project would look like and to gage interest from adjacent properties.
Stormwater Management/Wetlands
7. This project area has had some recent drainage concerns and past preliminary discussions have occurred with Rice Creek Watershed District on the best means to alleviate these concerns. This will require additional coordination with RCWD. Preferred overall site
Ms. Rachel Juba February 5, 2021 Page 2
C:\Users\rachel.juba\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\O7PY7DSU\LTR-r juba-Drengson Sketch Plan - 20210205 (002).docx
stormwater discharge location would be at the northwest corner to the existing ditch that runs west to an area drain near the intersection of Everest Ave N and 122nd St N. a. Recommend placing stormwater BMP in the northwest corner of the site at the lowest part of the site and near the desired discharge location rather than the high point of the site as shown. 8. Site will be required to provide a water quality treatment volume of 1.1 inches x total area of new or reconstructed impervious. a. If volume reduction practices (infiltration/water reuse) can be used on site, these will be required. b. If volume reduction practices are not feasible, any other BMP type may be used but the TP Factor listed in RCWD Table C1 must be applied to calculate the total water quality treatment volume required. c. Area not treated for phosphorus may not exceed 15% of all new or reconstructed impervious surface. For all untreated surface, TSS must be removed to the maximum extent practicable 9. Peak stormwater runoff rates for the 100-year 24-hour rainfall event is limited to 0.1 cfs/acre. a. Peak stormwater runoff rates for the proposed project must not exceed existing rates for the 2-year and 10-year 24-hour rainfall events using Atlas 14 rainfall depths. 10. The lowest building opening must be 3’ above the 100-year HWL and 1’ above the EOF of an adjacent BMP. 11. Storm sewer should be designed for a 10-year rainfall event. 12. Applicant will be required to demonstrate compliance with wetland bounce/inundation allowances outlined in RCWD Rule C.8 for the onsite wetland. 13. Site is outside of the 100-year floodplain – no floodplain requirements. 14. Applicant will be required to show compliance with all other RCWD and City of Hugo rules. 15. A wetland delineation on the parcel has been approved. The roadway and lot configuration appear to avoid potential wetland impacts. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463. Sincerely, WSB Mark Erichson, PE City Engineer cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only)
Dan May
Jared & Laura Drengson
1853 Birch Lake Ave
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
Laura phone: 651-269-6285
Email: ljmay14@msn.com
DRENGSON MAY ADDITION PROJECT NARRATIVE:
Prepared February 4, 2021
Introduction/ Overview:
This narrative has been prepared to accompany the recent sketch plan application that was submitted on
behalf of Dan May and Jared & Laura Drengson.
The proposed project lies easterly of Everton Avenue North and northerly of 121st Street North in the City
of Hugo. We are proposing to replat the 3 existing parcels, which total 15.15 acres, into 10 single family lots.
There is an existing home that would remain on one of the proposed lots (lot 10), which would remain and
meet all existing R1 standards.
The current parcels are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. The R-1 zoning provides for development
density of 1 unit per acre, which is consistent with the sketch plan provided.
What is your specific request? (Such as, setbacks, lot width, lot size, etc.)
Below is a comparison of the R-1 zoning code and the requested variance.
Item: Requirement: Requested Deviation:
Minimum Lot Width per R-1 150 Feet 30 feet for Lot 9
36.6 feet for Lot 8
This project will adhere to and match all of the following standards, with no deviation needed:
• Development Density = 1 acre. (Standard met, no deviation needed.)
• Minimum Lot Depth = 250 feet (Standard met, no deviation needed.)
• Front Setback = 30 feet (Standard met, no deviation needed.)
• Side Yard Setback = 10 feet (Standard met, no deviation needed.)
• Rear Yard Setback = 50 feet (Standard met, no deviation needed.)
• Wetland Setback = 30 feet (Standard met, no deviation needed.)
What applications do you expect to apply for?
• Would there be a need to rezone? If yes, then we would do so.
• Review and consideration of the partnership between city, developer, and neighbors to improve
121st Street North, and construct necessary utilities.
• Preliminary Plat Approval.
• Final Plat Approval.
• Minimum lot width variance for two lots
• Are there any other applications needed?
This project adjoins 121st Street North, which is one of the few unimproved streets in this
neighborhood. It is understood that this street will need to be improved, along with the installation
of utilities, in order to develop our parcel.
There are existing homes that front and utilize 121st Street. In communicating with these and
adjacent neighbors to our property, we have found several have interest in accessing city sewer
and/or water as well as having 121st Street paved. It is understood that this improvement project
may also provide benefit to said neighboring homes in these ways. We are hoping to collaborate
with the City of Hugo to better understand the process and cost sharing/ assessment opportunities
that may be associated with this street improvement project.
• DRAINAGE CONCERNS FROM NORTHERLY NEIGHBORS: It is understood that there are
drainage concerns from the neighboring homes to the north. The proposed layout does lend itself
to a pond design on the north end of the project, and it is anticipated that review of the site
topography and elevations for the northerly neighboring homes would be taken into consideration
with the civil design.
What are you asking of the city? What do you want the City to provide feedback on?
• Provide feedback on the feasibility of approving our project.
• Provide feedback on the feasibility of city assistance with the improvement of 121st Street and
extending municipal services to neighbors
Conclusion:
Thank you for your assistance and review of our proposed subdivision. We hope this plat will be a
welcomed contribution to the City of Hugo and surrounding neighborhoods by adding quality housing
and preserving the natural character of the site.
Feel free to inquire or reach out to our team if you have any additional questions or needs for the review
process.
Applicants: Surveyor: Civil Engineer:
Jared & Laura Drengson Jason Rud Chuck Plowe
Dan May
Dan May
Jared & Laura Drengson
1853 Birch Lake Ave
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
Laura phone: 651-269-6285
Email: ljmay14@msn.com
R-1 Minimum Lot-Width Variance
Chapter 90 Article IV Division 1. Sec. 90-96. – Large Lot Single-Family Residential District (R-1).
12165 Everton Ave. N. Hugo, MN
PID 31 -031-21-43-0001
On behalf of Dan May and the Drengsons, we are asking for a variance from the minimum lot width
requirement as stated in the R-1 Large Lot Single-Family Residential code. The current resident owner of the
12165 Everton Ave 5.37 acre property has chosen to subdivide his property into two separate parcels, selling
4.37 acres and retaining his home on 1.0 acre. As the buyers, we are seeking to split the 4.37 acres into two 2+
acre lots. However, due to the unique shape and position of the property, and the current owner’s desire to retain
his home on the acre which fronts Everton Ave, in purchasing the 4.37 acres, we are left with two access points.
One point of entry is on the northern boundary where the lot adjoins Everton Ave. with a frontage of 30ft. The
second is the southern point of entry where the lot adjoins 121st with a proposed frontage of 36.6ft.
Requirement Requested Deviation
Minimum Lot Width at Front Setback Line 150ft Lot 9: 30ft
Lot 8: 36.6ft
We recognize the deviations from the standard are significant, however, considering the unique position and
accessibility, we have come to find this is the most logical and certainly the most nature-preserving method of
access to these lots. In being granted this variation, we aim to maintain the quiet nature of the area and placing
only two large parcels on the 4.37 acres. We have, thus far, found this to be agreeable to our adjoining
neighbors.
It should be noted that there are existing parcels which adjoin our project and do not meet the 150 foot lot width
requirement. As a result, we feel this request is not a large departure from what exists within the neighborhood
today.
Providing Municipal Services
In providing the two lots in question with city sewer and water, our plan is to bring water and sewer from
Everton Ave to the proposed lot 9. We would then bring water up from 121st street to provide for lot 8. This is
shown in the sketch below.
Thank you all very much for your time and consideration of our project.
Sincerely,
Dan May
Jared & Laura Drengson
From:Rich Degnan
To:Emily Weber
Subject:Drengson Development/ Richard Degnan
Date:Wednesday, December 9, 2020 4:31:40 PM
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Emily,
I have been informed the city has in their possession preliminary plans for the development
adjacent to my property. This project will effect my property in many ways and I need to be
informed to stay on top of this.
This morning I received information and a plot/ plan view of the project. I want to get my
concerns out in the open about this proposed layout in it’s infancy. I am not apposed to this
development but will bring to your attention my concerns as follows.
#1 Land requirements per unit. Currently 1 acre required. I am apposed to the reduction unless
surrounding properties can benefit from installation of needed infrastructure.
#2 I am definitely apposed to the location of the retention pond on south, southeast corner of
project abutting my property.
The existing property already has a drainage problem on the west boarder, effecting
neighbors on that end. I do not want those problems shifted to my back yard raising
the water table any where near my property causing basement flooding, stench,
mosquitoes, private well or septic issues. This issue should be maintained where it
currently exist on the property.
#3 Updated topographical of the abutting properties as a whole is needed to address the
drainage. Not just the development property boundaries.
Currently my property is protected by a buffer of vegetation and woodland allowing
rain and snow melt to be contained to the existing property of subject. Without this
buffer and the clearing of land around this buffer my concern is my property will be at
lowest elevation to all surrounding properties including the road, Falcon Ave. Causing
my property to flood.
#4 This is the time to address the sewer systems in this area. I believe many home
owners are unaware the county has made it impossible for them to sell their
properties without updating their septic systems. This area would most
likely require unsightly mound systems diminishing the value of their
properties and limiting land usages within their property. A comprehensive plan of
the entire area should be considered before any development is approved. Including
drainage and future utility needs.
My interest is to protect our private wells in the area from aging septic systems
and replacing them with the same. These systems are not life time systems. I
would like to see consideration given to the area as a whole.
Please forward this message to the city’s planning commission and city council for
consideration.
I am requesting the city, keep me informed as they proceed.
Sincerely,
Rich Degnan
Sent from my iPad
On Oct 22, 2020, at 2:44 PM, Emily Weber <EWeber@ci.hugo.mn.us> wrote:
Hi Rich,
The City gets their parcel data from the County so I don’t have an update on the new
owners and there are no applications in right now for development on those parcels. It
is R-1 zoning, which requires a minimum lot size of one acre per lot should they want to
develop the parcels.
Emily
From: Rich Degnan [mailto:rdegnan1@hotmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 2:29 PM
To: Emily Weber <EWeber@ci.hugo.mn.us>
Subject: Re: Variance Application
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Hi Emily,
Rich Degnan here.
Wondering if you could share any information on the 10 acres abutting my property. As
you recall the old Shoellers place on 121st was sold this past spring. I mentioned to you
I’d like to stay informed on any proposed development. I have been watching the
Washington County Records Department web site for a change in ownership, but new
owners name is not registered on site yet. Are you able to share new owner names and
if any discussion about development is underway?
Thanks,
Rich
Sent from my iPad
On Apr 15, 2020, at 4:05 PM, Emily Weber <EWeber@ci.hugo.mn.us>
wrote:
Hi Rich,
See the attached letter in regards to the variance application. Let me
know if you have any questions. Thanks!
EMILY WEBER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT
CITY OF HUGO - MINNESOTA
14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N., Hugo, MN 55038
o: 651.762.6311 | www.ci.hugo.mn.us
<Incomplete - Degnan Variance 12160 Falcon Ave 04.15.20.pdf>
From:Rachel Juba
To:Emily Weber
Subject:FW: Drengson Development
Date:Thursday, February 11, 2021 9:46:03 AM
Can you provide this to the PC.
Thanks,
Rachel
From: Denise Sames [mailto:samesd@q.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 10, 2021 1:49 PM
To: Rachel Juba <RJuba@ci.hugo.mn.us>
Subject: Re: Drengson Development
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Rachel Juba; Thank you for sending the link to the packet for upcoming Planning Commissionmeeting this Thursday February 11, 2021. I've taken time to review and was extremely pleased to see that plans changed toinclude 1 acre lots. Storm Water Management concerns for the proposed development were raised byboth City of Hugo Community Development Department Director, Rachel Juba andCity of Hugo Engineer, Mark Erichson, PE. Storm Water Management is a large concern for me and my property as well. Myproperty follows along a portion of the eastern border of the proposed developmenton 121st Street N. The developer is proposing a stormwater management plan through the constructionof ponds within the site. The sketch plan shows the placement of proposed holdingpond on eastern portion of the proposed development. This proposed holding pond is of a real concern for me as it follows along a very largeportion of the eastern border of my property. The property and area surrounding the property has some drainage issues. Thestormwater management of this site should be evaluated to help solve the drainageissues. This might require the relocation of the proposed stormwater pond as shown on site. Staff will need to work with the developer, as this proposed project moves forward as
it relates to drainage and stormwater management. I'll plan on listening in on the virtual meeting @ 7 PM of the Planning Commission onFebruary 11, 2021. I would also appreciate your offer of getting paper copies of this proposeddevelopment mailed to me at 12116 Falcon Avenue N. White Bear Lake, MN 55110-5925. Respectfully submitted; Thomas J. Sames
From: "Rachel Juba" <RJuba@ci.hugo.mn.us>
To: "samesd" <samesd@q.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 9, 2021 8:57:33 AM
Subject: FW: Drengson Development
Tom:
Below the link to the packet that went to the Planning Commission. The plans have changed to
include 1 acre lots.
February 11, 2020 PC Packet
Let me know if you have any questions. Please let me know if you would like paper copies too.
Thanks,
RACHEL JUBA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
CITY OF HUGO - MINNESOTA
14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N., Hugo, MN 55038
o: 651.762.6304 | www.ci.hugo.mn.us
From: Rachel Juba
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 11:47 AM
To: 'Tom' <wave2000@aol.com>
Cc: Emily Weber <EWeber@ci.hugo.mn.us>
Subject: RE: Drengson Development
Tom:
No, there have not been.
I know they have been working on talking to the neighborhood and the plan.
Thanks,
Rachel
From: Tom [mailto:wave2000@aol.com]
Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2021 7:47 AM
To: Rachel Juba <RJuba@ci.hugo.mn.us>
Cc: Emily Weber <EWeber@ci.hugo.mn.us>
Subject: Drengson Development
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Hi Rachel
I hope you are well. Just wondering if there have been any new proposals presented to the city for
the Drengson development?
Thank you
Tom
From: Tom
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 11:52 AM
To: Rachel Juba
Cc: Becky Petryk
Subject: RE: Property for sale
Hi Rachel
That would be great – Ill call you this afternoon if that works for you.
Here are my questions:
1. I understand there are two 5 acre lots involved. Are both lots buildable?
2. Would the new owner be able to divide the lots into smaller lots to develop? (I hope not…)
3. If so, what would be minimum lot size allowed?
Thank you
Tom
From: Rachel Juba
Sent: Friday, April 3, 2020 10:44 AM
To: 'wave2000@aol.com'
Cc: Becky Petryk
Subject: RE: Property for sale
Hi Tom:
I am happy you discuss this with you. Can you call me at 612-741-4791?
Thanks,
RACHEL JUBA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
CITY OF HUGO - MINNESOTA
14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N., Hugo, MN 55038
o: 651.762.6304 | www.ci.hugo.mn.us
From: Rebecca Petryk [mailto:jdpetryk@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 02, 2020 4:16 PM
To: Rachel Juba <RJuba@ci.hugo.mn.us>
Subject: Fwd: Property for sale
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Sent from my iPhone
Begin forwarded message:
From: Tom <wave2000@aol.com>
Date: April 2, 2020 at 3:03:43 PM CDT
To: "jdpetryk@gmail.com" <jdpetryk@gmail.com>
Subject: Property for sale
Hello Becky
It has been a while. I hope you are well.
Parcel ID 3103121430009 Parcel ID 3103121430004
Not sure if you can answer my question, if not please let me know who can.
We just noticed that there is a property for sale just south of our home. It is a 10 acre
parcel.
Listing says it can be subdivided.
Listing is:
4990 121st St N
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
The Washington County Parcel Map shows it as two lots:
Can you tell me, what can a new owner do in regards to subdividing this lot or lots?
One of the reasons we first bought our 1 acre parcel was having low density housing,
which we would like to keep that way.
Thank you
Tom Sorensen
5049 124th St Ct N
White Bear Lake 55110
From:Tom
To:Emily Weber
Cc:Trese
Subject:Drengson Development Plans
Date:Monday, December 7, 2020 3:55:26 PM
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Thank you Emily for sending the sketch plan. We are both very disappointed in what we see. I know
you are just the messenger…
Is it OK for me to send the sketch plan to our neighbors?
We have many questions. Let us set up a time when it works for you to give you a call. Some of our
questions:
1. I see lots smaller than 1 acre, 14 lots in all. You and Rachael Juba both said these two
properties could never have more than 10 lots ever. You said 1 unit per acre max. Why is this
development even proposed in this manner then? I see additional land besides the two lots
being part of this proposal, is that why?
2. For subdivided development to move forward I was told by you that 121st Street would need
to be paved. Is that still a requirement? The road would need to be widened if so. Drainage
would also be required. This appears to be difficult. What is the developers plan to make this
happen? Are the existing property owners to be assessed?
3. Also for subdivided development to move forward I was told by you that new development
would need to have city water and sewer. Is this still true?
4. Would there be any restriction on the size of dwellings allowed?
5. If the city approves this, how much do the neighboring property owners, such as us, have to
say in whether this plan goes through or not?
Thank you
Tom
From: Emily Weber
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 2:27 PM
To: 'Tom'
Cc: Trese
Subject: RE: 12160 Falcon Ave N Variance
The sketch plan is attached. This is a very early submittal and staff has yet to review it.
Please call me and I’d be happy to discuss the sketch plan review process and participation.
Thanks!
EMILY WEBER
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT
CITY OF HUGO - MINNESOTA
14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N., Hugo, MN 55038
o: 651.762.6311 | www.ci.hugo.mn.us
From: Tom [mailto:wave2000@aol.com]
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 1:25 PM
To: Emily Weber <EWeber@ci.hugo.mn.us>
Cc: Trese <gromit618@aol.com>
Subject: RE: 12160 Falcon Ave N Variance
Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.
Thanks Emily
Can you send me the plan, I’m guessing not?
What are the steps involved?
At what point can neighbors inject their thoughts?
Thank you!
Tom
From: Emily Weber
Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 1:00 PM
To: 'Tom'
Cc: Trese
Subject: RE: 12160 Falcon Ave N Variance
Hi Tom,
There is a sketch plan submitted for those two parcels but it has yet to be scheduled for a Planning
Commission meeting. The sketch plan application does not allow for any formal approvals but allows
staff and the Commissioners to comment on the proposal.
Feel free to call me with any additional questions.
Thanks,