Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC PACKET 021121CITY OF�— Agenda Hugo Planning Commission Thursday, February 11, 2021 REMOTE MEETING 7:00 PM Meeting to be held remotely pursuant Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.021 Anyone who wishes to speak at the meeting is strongly encouraged to make arrangements by 4:30 p.m. on the day of the meeting by contacting Community Development Assistant, Emily Weber at 651- 762-6311 or eweber@ci.hugo.mn.us. For more information on the remote meeting and participation, go to: www.ci.hugo.mn.us/planning Meeting ID: 870 2764 4408 Meeting Link: https://us02web.zoom.us/m/87027644408 A. ROLL CALL: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Luchsinger, Mulvihill, Petty B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. OATH OF OFFICE D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. December 17, 2020 E. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Golden Valley Land Company - Requesting approval for a preliminary plat, planned unit development, and comprehensive plan amendment for a residential development to be known as "The Meadows at Hugo." F. NEW BUSINESS 1. Drengson May Enterprises, LLC. — Sketch Plan for the property located West of Falcon Avenue North and North of 1215t Street North. G. OLD BUSINESS 1. Adopt 2021 Goals H. ADJOURNMENT If you need accommodations for the Planning Commission meeting please contact Rachel Juba at (651) 762-6304 or rluba@ci.hugo.mn.us, thank you. Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of Thursday, December 17, 2020 Meeting held remotely pursuant Minn. Stat. Sec. 1313.021 Chair Kleissler called the meeting to order at 7:19 pm. PRESENT: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Luchsinger, Mulvihill. ABSENT: None. STAFF: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant Pledge of Allegiance. Approval of Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of November 19, 2020 Commissioner Arcand made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Mulvihill to approve minutes for the meeting of November 19, 2020. Ayes: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Luchsinger, Mulvihill. Nay: None. Motion carried. Public Hearing: Victor Land Holdings, LLC —13925 Fenway Boulevard North: preliminary plat, final plat, CUP, variance, easement vacation, and site plan applications Staff provided a background on the request. The site is located on the corner of 130t" Street North and Fenway Boulevard North, and is located within the Bald Eagle Industrial Park. It is currently two parcels totaling 1.6 acres and is zoned General Industrial. The applicant is proposing three buildings totaling approximately 38,000 square feet. Each one of the buildings have a number of units for a total of 14 units for the development. The buildings will be used for office, manufacturing, or warehouse purposed and will be sold or leased to individuals. The conditional use permit request is to allow a campus development on site as the applicant is proposing to combine the two existing parcels, creating one parcel with three buildings on it. The applicant is also proposing a variance from the Commercial and Industrial Design Standards outlined in the City Code to allow the buildings to be constructed of architectural metal panels. Staff recommended that the applicant incorporate brick, block, or stone to the base of the building at least three feet in height on each side of the buildings, and listed this as a condition of approval in the corresponding resolutions and conditional use permit. Staff found that the proposal meets all of the requirements necessary for the City to approve the preliminary plat, site plan, conditional use permit, variance, and easement vacation as outlined in the City Code and zoning regulations, if the appropriate conditions are met. Staff recommended approval subject to the conditions listed in the attached resolutions and conditional use permit. December 17, 2020 PC Minutes Page 2 The Commissioners discussed the architectural metal panels that are proposed in the applications and asked staff is there were any examples. Staff stated that the applicant submitted physical material samples and also provided examples of other buildings in surrounding communities that are constructed of the same material. Mark Wentzell, 292 Design Group, presented to the Planning Commission on behalf of the applicant. Wentzell provided more details on the proposed metal panels. There are two types of panels in the proposal, a wood grain aluminum pattern and profiled steel. These panels are made from recycled material and are durable, long lasting materials. The Commissioners asked the applicant questions on what was presented and continued their discussion on the metal panels. Chair Kleissler opened the public hearing at 8:07 pm. No one was present to speak. The public hearing was closed at 8:08 pm. The Commissioners generally agreed that they liked the site plan as presented by the applicant. Commissioner Arcand made a motion to approve the preliminary plat, CUP, variance, easement vacation, and site plan applications submitted by Victor Land Holdings, LLC, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution, except for the condition requiring three feet of masonry brick along all sides of the buildings. Motion seconded my Commissioner Mulvihill. Ayes: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Luchsinger, Mulvihill. Nay: None. Motion carried. New Business: Hugo Good Neighbors Food Shelf —15106 Francesca Avenue North: site plan application submitted by nai Architects, Inc. Staff provided a background on the application. The applicant is requesting approval of a 400 square foot addition to an existing building located at 15106 Francesca Avenue North. The owner and occupant of the building is the Hugo Good Neighbors Food Shelf. The existing building on site is 1,455 square feet and was approved in 2014. The proposed addition is to accommodate for a walk in refrigerator and freezer along with an expansion of the storage room. Staff found that the proposal meets all of the requirements necessary and recommended approval of the site plan application for the property located at 15106 Francesca Avenue North, subject to the conditions in the attached resolution. The applicant answered questions from the Planning Commission and provided more background on the request. Chris DuFresne stated that the addition will provide more opportunity for fresh produce to be distributed at the site. December 17, 2020 PC Minutes Page 3 Commissioner Arcand made a motion to approve the site plan application submitted by nai Architects, Inc. for the property locate at 15106 Francesca Avenue North, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution. Seconded by Commissioner Mulvihill. Ayes: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Mulvihill. Nay: None. Motion carried. Note: Commissioner Luchsinger had to leave the meeting early and was not present for roll call. Adjournment Commissioner Derr made a motion, Commissioner Lessard seconded, to adjourn at 8:20 pm. Ayes: Arcand, Derr, Fry, Kleissler, Lessard, Mulvihill. Nay: None. Motion carried. Respectfully Submitted, Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant Agenda Number: E.1 CITY OF HUGO PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Hugo Planning Commission FROM: Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant SUBJECT: Golden Valley Land Company — Requesting approval for a preliminary plat, planned unit development, and comprehensive plan amendment for a residential development to be known as "The Meadows at Hugo." DATE: February 5, 2021 for the Planning Commission meeting of February 11, 2021. ZONING: Future Urban Service (FUS) LAND USE: Medium Density Residential (MD) DEADLINE DATE: March 6, 2021 1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat, planned unit development (PUD), and comprehensive plan amendment for a residential development. The PUD totals 32.93 acres and has 5.92 acres of wetlands for a net area of 27.01 acres. The preliminary plat proposes a total of 87 single family lots and six outlots. The property is currently zoned Future Urban Service (FUS) and is proposed to be rezoned to Planning Unit Development (PUD). The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility on the following: • Flexibility to allow a minimum lot size of 5,500 square feet, where 10,400 square feet is required. • Flexibility to allow a minimum lot width of 44 feet, were 80 feet is required by ordinance. • Flexibility to allow a minimum front yard building setback of 25 feet, where 30 feet is required. • Flexibility to allow a minimum side yard setback of 5 feet, where 10 feet is required. Page 2 • Flexibility to allow a maximum percentage of impervious surface of 60%, where 50% is required. • Flexibility from the Shoreland Overlay District requirements through the PUD as approved by the MN DNR. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer is: • Designing a more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of the standard R-3 zoning district. • Preserving and enhancing natural features with the trail system that meanders through the development and connects to adjacent City park property. • Creating a connection through the Greenway Corridor in the City with the establishment of a passive trail. • Providing landscaping that exceeds the City's requirements. • Incorporating architectural design guidelines for homes within the development to ensure high quality and varied products. The applicant is also requesting approval of a comprehensive plan amendment. The developer's proposed utility plan identifies a connection to the Met Council Interceptor approximately 1,320 feet south of 165th Street North, which is at the northwest corner of the property. The City's Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan identifies a sanitary sewer connection to the Met Council Interceptor at 1651h Street North. Any modification to connection locations requires a comprehensive plan amendment. 2. BACKGROUND: The property is generally located north of 1591h Street North and east of Highway 61. The plan shows 87 single family, residential lots, wetlands and stormwater ponding areas, road and trail connections, and sidewalks and trails. The applicant is proposing the project to be built in two phases. The developer is not proposing a Homeowners Association or stormwater reuse for the development. The applicant previously applied for a sketch plan application and received comments from staff, the Planning Commission, and the City Council. At its February 27, 2020 meeting, the Planning Commission considered the site plan and generally liked the layout of the site, trail connections, and site access. The Planning Commission expressed concerns with the proposed 5 foot side yard setbacks and encouraged the applicant to use 7.5 foot side yard setbacks. They also discussed adding creativity to the site plan and layout to add character to development in exchange for the smaller side yard setbacks. The applicant amended their sketch plan for the March 16, 2020 City Council meeting and received more feedback. Generally the City Council agreed with the Planning Commission and suggested using a creative approach to the layout of the site in order to avoid monotony. Some suggestions included offering a variety of products, staggering front yard setbacks, and keeping villa products at one-story or one and a half story. Page 3 3. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding land Use and Zoning The properties to north are zoned FUS and guided as Medium Density Residential (MD) in the 2040 Land Use Plan. The property to the east is zoned Restricted Industrial (RI-1) and is guided Industrial. To the south is the Creekview Preserve Development, which is occupied by single family homes and zoned Single Family Detached Residential (R-3). West of the property is City owned park property that was dedicated with the Oneka Place development. Also adjacent to the property is the City's north water tower site. B. Natural Characteristics of Site The property is currently vacant and does contain some challenges regarding existing wetlands and a ditch. The property contains 5.92 acres of wetlands and a section of Judicial Ditch 3. 4. ANALYSIS: A. Level of Discretion in Decision Making The City has discretion in approving or denying rezoning applications, based on whether or not the proposal meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable standards are met, the rezoning application must be approved. However, if the City finds that any of the applicable standards are not met, the application may be denied. The City has a relatively high level of discretion in approving a PUD. A PUD must be consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. The City's discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Rezoning/Planned Unit Development The use of the PUD zoning allows the developer zoning ordinance flexibility to create a master planned development. The PUD zoning is tied to a specific PUD general plan that is proposed with this application. Golden Valley Land Company, is requesting an approval of a PUD general plan for The Meadows at Hugo development. PUD's offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of zoning district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater Page 4 variety of uses, internal transfers of density, construction phasing and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the city has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of other, more standard zoning districts. In order to approve a PUD, the City must find that the applicant has demonstrated compliance with the following criteria: 1. Provide for the establishment of PUD zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations, to create and maintain a development pattern that complies with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 2. Allow for the mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land uses could not otherwise be accomplished. 3. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. 4. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability and general welfare of the City. 5. Preserve and enhance natural features and open spaces including but not limited to the width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas, development of buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint facilities and utilities. 6. Maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities. 7. Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. In exchange for the proposed PUD, the applicant is proposing a more sensitive development proposal than would have been the case with the use of the standard R-3 zoning district, preservation of natural features with the trail system that meanders through the development, and multiple trail connections. The applicant is also incorporating architectural design guidelines for the homes in the development and providing varied product types. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan shows the land use being Medium Density Residential (MD). The rezoning/PUD is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in terms of land use and density. Staff believes that the general layout of the proposed Meadows at Hugo PUD general plan will exceed the City's standards for residential developments. The applicant is proposing on -site wetland mitigation, which ultimately preserves high quality wetlands. It is in staff s opinion that The Meadows at Hugo PUD general plan will offer a creative and efficient method to planning the site, meeting the intent of the PUD ordinance. Page 5 Lot Sizes/Setbacks The applicant is proposing to subdivide the 32.93-acre site into 87 single family home sites. The applicant is proposing a combination of product types, lot sizes, and building setbacks listed below: Required Proposed (R3) 2-Story Villa 1-Story Villa Minimum lot size 10,400 sq. 5,400 sq. ft. ft. 6,750 sq. ft. Minimum lot width at front setback line 80 ft. 44 ft. 50 ft. Minimum lot depth 100 ft. 135 ft. 135 ft. Minimum front yard building setback 30 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. Minimum side yard building setback 10 ft. 7.5 ft. 5 ft. Minimum rear yard building setback 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. Maximum lot area covered by impervious surface 50% Up to 55% Up to 60% * Requested PUD flexibility highlighted in grey Density The Medium Density residential designation identifies a minimum density of three units per acre and a maximum density of eight units per acre. The applicant is proposing a residential net density of 3.22 units per 1 acre, which aligns with the Medium Density standards in the 2040 Land Use Plan. Medium Density residential allows single-family homes, townhomes, and multifamily dwellings as permitted types of development. The primary intent is to respond to a need for smaller homes on smaller lots and to expand housing opportunities within the City. By providing flexibility on lot sizes and setback requirements, the developer is able to meet the intent of the land use designation. Shoreland The property is in the Shoreland Overlay District as it falls 300 feet within Judicial Ditch (JD) 3. The development is required to meet the DNR Shoreland Overlay District requirements for planned unit developments. In order to meet the DNR requirements for PUDs within the Shoreland Overlay District, the applicant is proposing 25 single family lots along JD3 and maintaining 50% open space from the lots to the ditch. The applicant is required to show proof of approval from the DNR. Development Phasing The applicant is proposing to construct the development in two phases. The phasing plan that the applicant provided shows the phasing generally starting from the west to east. The first phase would be constructed in 2021 and include the platting of 48 lots. The second phase will include Page 6 the remaining 39 lots with construction planned in 2023. The property is proposed to be mass graded to accommodate wetland mitigation and stormwater management. Landscaping/ Signage The applicant has provided a full landscape plan. According to Section 90-181 Landscaping, each home site shall have two deciduous shade trees maintained in the front yard. The applicant is also proposing to have two trees per lot, however, one tree in the front yard and one tree elsewhere on the lot. In addition to trees on each lot, the applicant is proposing trees along the public streets. The applicant is proposing to install approximately 228 trees throughout the development. Staff recommends the applicant ensure that the boulevard trees are located outside of the right of way. Staff is comfortable with the landscaping of the development. The applicant is not proposing any signage at this time. Lighting The applicant is proposing typical street lighting within the development that meets the ordinance standard. The exact locations and design of the street lights will be evaluated with each final plat application. Staff recommends the street lights be a decorative, lantern style. Streets/Access The applicant is proposing access into the development from the southwest portion of the property. This requires an extension of Farnham Avenue North through City -owned property. During the sketch plan review process, the Planning Commission and City Council was comfortable with allowing access through the City -owned property provided that the public street was constructed at the developer's expense. This will also allow access to the passive park that was dedicated with the Oneka Place development. The applicant is proposing to construct the road at their expense. They are also showing an access driveway connecting to the City's water tower from the public road. This will allow access to the water tower to come from the north and through City property. The applicant shall provide a curb cut at the location indicated on the site plan. The intersection at 159th Street North and Farnham Avenue North will remain with no stop controls at 159th Street North and a stop condition on Farnham Avenue from the north and south. The City is requesting that the developer removes the existing sidewalk on the east side of the Farnham Avenue North stub street. The applicant will be required to provide a legal description and right of way document for the public road on the City -owned property as part of the final plat application. In addition to the access from the south, there are two road connections proposed to the north that will provide access to the two adjacent northern properties and eventually out to 165th Street North. Page 7 Sidewalks, Trails, and Park Dedication The applicant is proposing an eight foot trail throughout the development as shown in the trails plan to connect between Farnham Avenue North and eventually north to 165th Street North, with future development. The applicant has shown a trail along both road connections to the north, which allows more options for future connections to the north as well as provide a more consistent and linear corridor. The applicant is also proposing a trail connection to the west that will provide access into the City -owned park land that is adjacent to the development. The applicant has stated that there will be an additional mowed, passive trail along the ditch on the east side of the development. The passive trail will be consistent with making connections within the Greenway Corridor as indicated in the 2040 Comprehensive Place. Staff is comfortable with the trail connections and location. Land dedication is not preferred as there is future park property to the west and Frog Hollow, an active park, constructed to the south. The park dedication fee is currently $2,400 per unit for a total of $208,800 for the development. Utilities As identified in the City's Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan, a 24 inch trunk watermain will need to be extended north from the water tower location. The 24 inch water main will be extended north throughout the development with the City paying for oversizing costs. As identified in the City's Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan, a 36 inch trunk main is identified as a connection to the Met Council Interceptor. The proposed plan identifies a connection to the Interceptor at approximately 1320 feet south of 165th Street North, which requires a Comprehensive Plan Amendment. The applicant will be required to obtain approval from the Metropolitan Council for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment prior to final plat. The applicant is also required to get a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District to allow ditch crossing for the utility connection to the east. Easements The applicant shall obtain the appropriate easement documents for a 50-foot easement along the north property line as well as a 50-foot easement through the adjacent property to the east. This easement shall follow the northern property lines from the adjacent property and extend north to 165th Street North in order to accommodate for future utility extensions. Stormwater Management/Wetlands The applicant is meeting rate control and water quality requirements through multiple stormwater ponds that are adjacent and hydraulically connected to the various wetlands throughout the property. Due to the proximity of a stormwater pond to JD3, the applicant has applied for and received Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes (CAPROC) for a Rule I Permit with Page 8 the Rice Creek Watershed District. Additionally, the applicant will be required to address all redline drainage comments provided to the applicant from the City Engineer as addressed in the memo dated February 5, 2021, prior to the issuance of the stormwater permit. The applicant is proposing to impact 1.72 acres of the 5.92 acres of wetland for street and pond construction. All wetland mitigation will be done on site. The applicant has submitted a wetland replacement plan to the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) for approval of the wetland impacts. The wetland replacement plan will need to be approved prior to final plat approval of any phase. The City requested that the developer use a water reuse system for lawn irrigation in order to further meet PUD requirements and the City's overall water conservation goals. However, due to site constraints, the applicant has provided calculations to demonstrate why this is not reasonably feasible. The minimal grade change across the site and the presence of wetlands throughout the site limit the amount of water that can be drawn from stormwater ponds. In other residential developments that utilize a water reuse system, ponds can be drawn down 3 or 4 feet prior to any negative wetland impacts. However, due to the hydraulic connection between the ponds and wetlands on this site, a 6 inch difference in water level could negatively impact the wetlands and is not permitted under WCA regulations. Staff has recommended the developer consider alternative water conservation practices for the development. Housing Types/Covenants Golden Valley Land Co. is partnering with Centra Homes as the builder for this project. The applicant is proposing two housing types, both of which will be slab on grade. The 50-foot lots will have single -story, 40-foot wide single family homes and the 44-foot lots will have two-story, 29-foot wide single family homes. All homes will have an attached two car garage. The applicant has stated that the front of the garages will remain flush with the front of the home in order to avoid a "garage forward" design. The developer is not proposing a homeowners association but has provided draft covenants for the development. The covenants include accessory building restrictions, architectural guidelines, and implementing the usage of smart water saving technology within the homes. Final approval of the covenants is required prior to final plat approval and staff will continue to work with the applicant on this. Examples of the product type and layout are included in the attachments. Comprehensive Plan Amendment The City's Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan identifies the way in which properties are to be served by sanitary sewer. A sanitary sewer connection to the Met Council Interceptor is identified at 1651h Street North with a 33 inch trunk main. The proposed utility plan identifies a connection to the Interceptor approximately 1,320 feet south of 165th Street North. The City will be responsible for paying for oversizing costs of the trunk main. While the proposed sewer connection is different than what is shown on the Comprehensive Plan, it does propose an alternative way to serve the development and other properties due to the Page 9 difficulties of the sanitary sewer planned to be available from the north and water main being available from the south. Staff is comfortable with the proposed connection, as all surrounding properties will be adequately served with sanitary sewer at the time of future development. The applicant shall obtain drainage and utility easements from the property to the east out to 1651h Street North to allow the sanitary sewer to be extended in the future. The applicant has provided draft easement documents from the adjacent property owner to the north to accommodate the sewer and water utility locations. Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat consists of 87 residential lots and 6 outlots. The proposed use and ownership of each outlot are as follows: Outlot Acres Ownership Use A 1.89 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management B 5.16 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management C 2.61 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management D 0.97 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management E 0.68 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management F 7.16 Thommes and Thomas Land Clearing Remain Zoned as Future Urban Service Outlot F is to remain under current ownership and will continue to be zoned Future Urban Service. The outlot shall be combined with the parcel to the east and will be rezoned with future development. There will be no access to Outlot F from the west and shall only be allowed from the east. 5. CONCLUSION: Staff believes that the layout of the proposed The Meadows at Hugo PUD general plan exceeds the City's standards for residential developments. Golden Valley Land Company has offered a more creative and efficient approach to the existing constraints of the property through the site design layout. It is in staff s opinion that the applicant meets all the requirements necessary to approve the PUD, preliminary plat, and comprehensive plan amendment, subject to the conditions listed in the resolutions. 6. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the PUD, preliminary plat, and comprehensive plan amendment for Golden Valley Land Company for the development to be known as "The Meadows at Hugo," subject to the conditions listed in the resolutions. Page 10 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location map 2. Ordinance approving the rezoning to PUD 3. Resolution approving the PUD General Plan 4. Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat 5. Resolution approving the Comprehensive Plan Amendment 6. Engineer's Memo dated February 5, 2021 7. DNR Approval Letter dated February 2, 2021 8. RCWD Condition of Approval dated February 2, 2021 9. Applicant Narrative 10. Preliminary Plat dated February 4, 2021 11. Site Plan Submittal dated January 26, 2021, received January 28, 2021 �a a � L LL LLI�! 'S�th Stre Roads '7 ORDINANCE 2020-503 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO AMENDING CHAPTER 90 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED NORTH OF 159TH STREET NORTH AND WEST OF HIGHWAY 61 THE CITY OF HUGO ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Chapter 90 of the City Code of the City of Hugo, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Hugo Zoning Map to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with respect to the 32.93-acre property legally described as follows: See Attached Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council this I' day of March, 2021. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Ordinance 2020-503 Page 2 RESOLUTION 2021 - XX APPROVING PUD GENERAL PLAN FOR GOLDEN VALLEY LAND COMPANT FOR "THE MEADOWS AT HUGO" ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF 159TH STREET NORTH AND WEST OF HIGHWAY 61 WHEREAS, Golden Valley Land Company, has requested approval of a PUD general plan to allow 87 single family residential lots and 5 outlots on 32.93 acres on property legally described as follows: (See Attached) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the PUD general plan at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Golden Valley Land Company, subject to the following conditions: 1. A PUD general plan is approved to allow the creation of approximately 87 single family residential lots and 5 outlots. The development shall be constructed in accordance with the application and plans received by the City on December 4, 2020, January 28, 2021, and February 4, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the requested rezoning of the 32.93 acres of the property and preliminary plat. 3. The PUD general plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. 4. The developer shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer's letter dated February 5, 2021 and all red -lined comments provided to the applicant. 5. PUD flexibility is granted to allow: a. Flexibility to allow a minimum lot size of 5,500 square feet, where 10,400 square feet is required. b. Flexibility to allow a minimum lot width of 44 feet, were 80 feet is required by ordinance. c. Flexibility to allow a minimum front yard building setback of 25 feet, where 30 feet is required. d. Flexibility to allow a minimum side yard setback of 5 feet, where 10 feet is required. 6. The developer must comply with the Shoreland Overlay District requirements through the The Meadows at Hugo's PUD General Plan as approved by the DNR. Resolution 2021 AX Page 2 7. The preliminary phasing plan is generally approved per plans dated January 25, 2021. The phasing plan shall be revised to include all improvements, such as stormwater management and trails. Any major revisions to the phasing plan shall require a PUD amendment. Minor modifications shall be reviewed and approved by staff. a. In addition to the lots and improvements shown on the submitted plans, phase 1 shall include the passive trail connection to the City -owned park land west of the development and the sewer and water infrastructure along the entire length of the north property line. b. Phase 2 shall include the passive trail path along JD3 and connection to the Greenway Corridor. 8. The building setbacks and impervious surface coverage requirements for the PUD are as follows: Required (R3) Proposed 2-Story Villa I -Story Villa Minimum lot size 10,400 sq. ft. 5,400 sq. ft. 6,750 sq. ft. Minimum lot width at front setback line 80 ft. 44 ft. 50 ft. Minimum lot depth 100 ft. 135 ft. 135 ft. Minimum front yard building setback 30 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. Minimum side yard building setback 10 ft. 7.5 ft. 5 ft. Minimum rear yard building setback 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. Maximum lot area covered by impervious surface 50% Up to 55% Up to 60% 9. The developer has indicated that covenants will be established for the development to manage architectural design and aesthetics within the development. The covenant document shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the recording of the final plat for the Phase 1. 10. The developer must comply with the following, prior to Final Plat and Final PUD Plan application approval: Landscaping and Lighting a. All trees shall be located outside of the public right of way. a. The exact locations and design of the street lights will be evaluated with each final plat application. The street lights shall be a decorative, lantern style and shall comply with the City standards for street lighting within the public right-of-way. Resolution 2021-XX Page 3 Streets/Access a. The developer shall be required to extend Farnham Avenue North through City - owned property at their expense. i. The developer shall provide a legal description and right of way document for the public road constructed on the City -owned property. b. The developer is required to provide a curb cut to allow access to the City water tower, as indicated on the approved plan set. Covenants a. The developer shall establish covenants to implement architectural design guidelines for all residential buildings. The covenants shall be reviewed approved by City staff. Wetlands a. The wetland mitigation plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Technical Evaluation Panel. Utilities a. The developer shall obtain approval of a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District to allow a ditch crossing for the utility connection to the east. Easements a. The developer shall obtain the appropriate easement documents for a 50-foot easement along the north property line as well as a 50-foot easement through the adjacent property to the east, prior to final plat approval. This easement shall follow the northern property lines from the adjacent property and extend north to 165t' Street North in order to accommodate for future utility extensions. Resolution 2021-XX Page 4 ADOPTED by the City Council this 1st day of March, 2021. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Resolution 2021-XX Page 5 PID: 0803121330001 Legal Description: The Southwest % of the Southwest I of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, Washington County, Minnesota. RESOLUTION 2021-XX APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR GOLDEN VALLEY LAND COMPANT FOR "THE MEADOWS AT HUGO" ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF 159TH STREET NORTH AND WEST OF HIGHWAY 61 WHEREAS, Golden Valley Land Company, has requested approval of a PUD general plan to allow 87 single family residential lots and 5 outlots on 40.07 acres on property legally described as follows: (See Attached) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the preliminary plat at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Golden Valley Land Company, for a preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved to allow the creation of 87 single family home lots and 6 outlots, in accordance with the application and plans received by the City on December 4, 2020, January 28, 2021, and February 4, 2021, except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of a rezoning to PUD for the 32.93 acres shown on the PUD General Plan. 3. The developer must comply with Resolution 2021-XX for the PUD. 4. The developer must comply with all conditions outlined in the City Engineer's memos dated February 5, 2021 and all red -lined comments provided to the applicant. 5. Park Dedication is proposed to be satisfied by fee. The park dedication fee shall be paid for each lot platted at the amount of $2,400.00. 6. The developer has indicated that covenants will be established for the development to implement architectural design guidelines. The covenants shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the recording of the final plat for the Phase 1. 7. The developer must comply with the Shoreland Overlay District requirements through the The Meadows at Hugo's PUD General Plan as approved by the DNR. Resolution 2021-XX Page 2 8. The building setbacks and impervious surface requirements for the development are as follows: Required (R3) Proposed 2-Story Villa 1-Story Villa Minimum lot size 0, ft q 5,400 sq. ft. 6,750 sq. ft. Minimum lot width at front setback line 80 ft. 44 ft. 50 ft. Minimum lot depth 100 ft. 135 ft. 135 ft. Minimum front yard building setback 30 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. Minimum side yard building setback 10 ft. 7.5 ft. 5 ft. Minimum rear yard building setback 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. Maximum lot area covered by impervious surface 50% Up to 55% Up to 60% 9. Outlot Use and Ownership: A. Outlot F is to remain under current ownership and will continue to be zoned Future Urban Service. The outlot shall be combined with the parcel to the east and will be rezoned with future development. There will be no access to Outlot F from the west and shall only be allowed from the east. Outlot Acres Ownership Use A 1.89 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management B 5.16 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management C 2.61 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management D 0.97 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management E 0.68 City of Hugo Wetland and Stormwater Management F 7.16 Thommes and Thomas Land Clearing Remain Zoned as Future Urban Service 10. The landscaping planned for the development shall be installed all at the same time during each phase. The developers shall take proper precautions to protect the trees as the homes are being built. 11. The developer must comply with the following, prior to Final Plat and Final PUD Plan application approval: Landscaping and Lighting a. All trees shall be located outside of the public right of way. b. The exact locations and design of the street lights will be evaluated with each final plat application. The street lights shall be a decorative, lantern style and shall comply with the City standards for street lighting within the public right-of-way. Resolution 2021-XX Page 3 Streets/Access a. The developer shall be required to extend Farnham Avenue North through City -owned property at their expense. i. The developer shall provide a legal description and right of way document for the public road constructed on the City -owned property. b. The developer is required to provide a curb cut to allow access to the City water tower, as indicated on the approved plan set. Covenants a. The developer shall establish covenants to implement architectural design guidelines for all residential buildings. The covenants shall be reviewed approved by City staff. Wetlands a. The wetland mitigation plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Technical Evaluation Panel. Utilities a. The developer shall obtain approval of a permit from the Rice Creek Watershed District to allow a ditch crossing for the utility connection to the east. Miscellaneous a. The developer must obtain all necessary stormwater management and WCA permits from the City. b. The developer shall obtain all necessary local, state, and federal permits. 11. Prior to the release of a final plat for recording, the developer must comply with the following conditions: a. The City's development fees will apply to this project. The fee amounts will be calculated and included as part of the Development Agreement. A development agreement shall be executed and all fees shall be paid. b. Park Dedication shall be paid for each lot platted in the amount of $2,400.00 per lot. Resolution 2021-XX Page 4 c. The developer shall obtain the appropriate easement documents for a 50-foot easement along the north property line as well as a 50-foot easement through the adjacent property to the east. This easement shall follow the northern property lines from the adjacent property and extend north to 1651 Street North in order to accommodate for future utility extensions. d. The developer shall submit a construction plan set that is consistent with the preliminary plat dated February 4, 2021. c. The developer must receive written approval from the Metropolitan Council for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. f. The developer shall have their proposed covenants approved by staff to include language on architectural design, accessory building requirements, and water conservation practices. Formatted: Indent: Left: 0" 12_Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer must comply with the- - Formatted: Indent: Left: 0", Hanging: 0.31", No bullets or following conditions. numbering a. The applicant shall record the final plat, development agreement and all other documentation at Washington County and provide the City with proof of recording. Resolution 2021-XX Page 5 ADOPTED by the City Council this 1" day of March, 2021. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Resolution 2021-XX Page 6 PIM 0803121330001 Legal Description: The Southwest h of the Southwest Y. of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 21 west, according to the united States Government Survey thereof, Washington county, Minnesota. RESOLUTION 2021-XX APPROVING A COMPRHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CHANGING MAP 11-4, 2040 SANITARY SEWER SYSTEM MAP WHEREAS, the Golden Valley Land Company has proposed an alternate location for a sanitary sewer connection to the Met Council Interceptor. The 2040 Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan identifies a connection to the Met Council Interceptor at 165th Street North. The new connection will be located approximately 1,320 feet south of 1651h Street North. WHEREAS, the City of Hugo Planning Commission, at a public hearing on February 11, 2021, reviewed the proposed map amendment and recommended approval of the application to the Metropolitan Council for the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve a Comprehensive Plan Amendment changing a sanitary sewer connection on Map 11-4, 2040 Sanitary Sewer System Map. ADOPTED by the City Council this 1st day of March, 2021. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk 0 0 Z w 00 U) LO 00 00 N u) 0 LO 0 CD W D U) W W U) m W 00 wsb February 5, 2021 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Meadows at Hugo Preliminary Plat Review WSB Project No. 013597-000 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the Preliminary Plat submittal for the Meadows at Hugo. We have reviewed the following information related to this application: • The Meadows at Hugo Preliminary Plat/PUD Submittal dated January 26, 2021 by Civil Site Group • The Meadows at Hugo Stormwater Management Report dated January 26, 2021 by Civil Site Group • The Meadows at Hugo Preliminary Plat dated January 26, 2021 by Civil Site Group • The Meadows at Hugo Geotechnical Report dated December 4, 2020 by Haugo GeoTechnical Services • The Meadows at Hugo Preliminary Plat/PUD Narrative dated January 26, 2021 by Civil Site Group • Phasing Plan Based on the review of the documents, we offer the following comments related to this application: General/Access The subject property is located north of 159t" Street, south of 165t" Street and east of Water Tower No. 3. The parcel doesn't have any public roadway frontage at this time, however with the Oneka Place Development, the City had received Outllot J that would allow for access to the subject property. The proposed access road to the site extends through this Outlot and through the City owned property where our water tower resides. The extension of the roadway to the development site would be the developer's responsibility. The intersection at this location would remain with no stop controls at 159th Street and a stop condition on Farnham Avenue from the north and south. With access proposed from Farnham Avenue, the proposed plan does show future roadway connections to the north, which will ultimately connect with 165t" Street. Staff concurs with not providing access to the property to the east as it is guided industrial, however utilities will be extended to this property. S:\Users\R_Juba\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\The Meadows at Hugo\Preliminary Plat and PUD\Engineer Comments\LTR-r juba-Meadows at Hugo Pre Plat- PUD - 20210204.docx Ms. Rachel Juba February 5, 2021 Page 2 Utility Plan 4. As identified in the City's Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan, a 24" trunk watermain is proposed to be extended north from the water tower location. The construction plans identify this 24" trunk watermain being extended through the development to the northern property line, with the City of Hugo paying for oversizing costs. 5. The City's Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan identifies the way in which properties are to be served by sanitary sewer. A sanitary sewer connection to the MCES Interceptor is identified at 165th Street with a 36" trunk main, providing service to a large portion of land east of TH 61. The proposed plan identifies a connection to the MCES Interceptor approximately 1320 feet south of 1651h Street which will ultimately make the development of the area more feasible considering the watermain is at the southwestern portion of the site and the connection to the MCES interceptor per the comprehensive sanitary sewer plan is approximately 1320 feet from the northern border of the development. 6. Due to the size of the and projected long-term flow anticipated in this sewer extension an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) would normally be required, however the City had prepared an Alternative Urban Areawide Assessment (AUAR) for the Everton Area in 2001. This plan has been updated every 5 years and contains the necessary information to fulfill the EAW requirements. 7. This trunk sanitary sewer is proposed to be constructed on the north property line of the development. The applicant has provided signed drainage and utility easements for the adjacent property to the north. The applicant will also be required to provide drainage and utility easements to the allow the sanitary sewer to be extended to the northeast up to 165th Street. Easements through parcel (PIN 0803121340002) will ensure the ability to extend the sewer up to 165th Street should the need arise. 8. Staff has asked MCES what process, if any, is required for the change in location of the connection to the MCES Interceptor from what is identified in the Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan. Stormwater Management/Wetlands 9. Applicant is meeting rate control and water quality stormwater requirements through multiple stormwater ponds adjacent to and hydraulically connected to the wetlands throughout the property. 10. The City requested the development use water reuse to provide the required water quality volume however the applicant has provided calculations and arguments which demonstrates why this isn't feasible due to site constraints. Due to the minimal grade change across the site and the presence of wetlands throughout the site the stormwater ponds are hydraulically connected with the wetlands which restricts the amount of water which can be drawn from a stormwater pond for irrigation. For other developments that utilize a water reuse system, the ponds can draw down 3-4 feet without any negative consequences, however due to the hydraulic connection of the ponds and wetland, even drawing the pond down 6" has negative impacts on the wetlands. The applicant provided calculations showing that if water reuse were implemented, the wetlands would likely only receive water 1-2 times per year which would cause a loss of the onsite wetlands and would not be permitted under WCA regulations. 11. The applicant has applied for and received Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes (CAPROC) for a Rule I Permit with RCWD for work adjacent to and within JD 3. All changes requested by RCWD will need to be addressed. 12. The applicant is showing that all proposed lots meet the City's freeboard requirements. 13. Additional detailed redline drainage comments have been provided to the applicant and will need to be addressed prior to the issuance of the stormwater permit. 14. A wetland delineation on the parcel was approved during the fall of 2018. S:\Users\R_Juba\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\The Meadows at Hugo\Preliminary Plat and PUD\Engineer Comments\LTR-rjuba-Meadows at Hugo Pre Plat-PUD - 20210204.docx Ms. Rachel Juba February 5, 2021 Page 3 15. The plan has a number of impacts to wetlands and the applicant has provided an on -site wetland replacement plan. The Technical Evaluation Panel will be reviewing the replacement plan in the next 1-2 weeks. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463. Sincerely, WSB Mark Erichson, PE City Engineer cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) Peter Knaeble, Golden Valley Land Co. (email only) Matt Pavek, Civil Site Group (email only) S:\Users\R_Juba\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\The Meadows at Hugo\Preliminary Plat and PUD\Engineer Comments\LTR-rjuba-Meadows at Hugo Pre Plat-PUD - 20210204.docx DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES February 4, 2021 Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: DNR Approval of the Preliminary Plat and PUD for The Meadows at Hugo Dear Ms. Weber, Thank you for submitting to the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) the Preliminary Plat and PUD for The Meadows at Hugo. The plans, received January 19, 2021, were submitted to DNR prior to final approval by the City as required by Minn. Rules 6120.3800, Subpart 1. Minnesota's shoreland management rules provide a comprehensive set of standards to preserve and enhance the quality of surface waters, conserve the economic and natural environmental values of shorelands, and provide for the wise use of water and related land resources. We greatly appreciate the early engagement efforts by the developer and the City to work with DNR staff to apply the state's shoreland standards for PUD density and open space. As described in the attached email sent January 31, 2017 and in subsequent communications, Hugo's existing shoreland management ordinance does not include PUD standards compliant with state law. Until the City amends its ordinance, DNR must approve all shoreland PUDs before final Council approval to ensure compliance with the state's shoreland PUD standards in Minn. Rules 6120.3800. We reviewed the Preliminary Plat and PUD and determined it is compliant with the state's rules for residential PUDs in shoreland. • The PUD preserves over 50% of the area within the shoreland district as permanent open space. The actual percentage preserved is 58%. • The PUD sets aside 70% of the shore impact zone for preservation in a natural state, including new on - site wetland area for Wetland Conservation Act required mitigation. • The developer properly conducted a density evaluation to determine the allowable number of dwelling units in the shoreland district. By meeting the required design standards, the plan qualifies for a bonus density increase in the allowable number of dwelling units (up to 27) in shoreland. The plan proposes a total of 25 dwelling units in the shoreland district. Prior to final approval by the City, please ensure that deed restrictions, covenants, permanent easements, public dedication and acceptance, or other equally effective and permanent means are in place to ensure long-term preservation and maintenance of the open space as required by Minn. Rules 6120.3800, Subpart 5(C). Please inform the developer that construction dewatering in excess of 10,000 gallons per day of surface water or groundwater, or one million gallons per year, for the construction of the homes, stormwater features, or utilities at the proposed development will require a DNR Water Appropriation Permit. Thank you for applying the state shoreland PUD standards to this development and for working to preserve and enhance surface water quality. We encourage the City to amend its shoreland ordinance to adopt the shoreland PUD provisions. When amended, DNR will no longer need to approve each PUD prior to Council approval. Sincerely, Dan Scollan DNR East Metro Area Hydrologist Attachments: DNR's Email dated January 31, 2017 CC: Jack Gleason, DNR South District Hydrologist Supervisor Dan Petrik, DNR Land Use Program From: Sorensen. Jenifer (DNR) To: Rachel Juba Cc: Petrik. Daniel (DNR) Subject: RE: January Hugo TEP Meeting Date: Tuesday, January 31, 2017 3:43:27 PM Attachments: Shoreland Model Ordinance 010917 with commentarv.odf Sec. 90 137 SLDistrict Downloaded072415.docx 2004-03-OOH uaoSLControls. odf 1995-12-21 H ugoSLOrdAoorovalwithFlex. pelf 1995-08-07HuaoSLOrd.Ddf Shoreland Ordinance Review Checklist.dooc Rachel — Attached is DNR's recently updated shoreland (SL) model ordinance, including a section with the SL PUD standards. Right now, Hugo's SL ordinance does not include SL PUD standards. When a community does not have SL PUD standards in its SL ordinance, DNR is required to approve SL PUDs to make sure they meet the SL PUD density and open space requirements. The last time that DNR reviewed and approved Hugo's SL ordinance was in 1995 (see attached approval letter and Hugo's 1995 SL ordinance). At that time, the City's SL ordinance contained the SL PUD standards. In 2004, area hydrologist Travis Germundson contacted the City of Hugo to state that the City's SL ordinance was no longer substantially compliant with state standards (see attached). I don't think any action has been taken since 2004 to get a compliant ordinance in place. So, there is a need to look at Hugo's latest SL ordinance (attached) for compliance with state SL standards and update the language for approval by DNR. The first step in the review is to compare the City's current SL standards to DNR's SL ordinance review checklist (attached), to see what language is in and what language is not in the current City ordinance. If all of the language is within one ordinance, this is pretty straightforward; if the SL standards are embedded in other city code, it's harder. If the SL ordinance is a standalone ordinance, the model ordinance can be used as a template for an updated City SL ordinance, making the whole process a lot easier. Would you like to visit first by phone to discuss approach, or would you like to set up an in -person meeting? I can come up to Hugo's City Hall. I'm available: • Tuesday, February 7 — Any time before 2 pm • Wednesday, February 8 —Before 12 pm • Friday, February 10 — Before 3 pm • Tuesday, February 14—Anytime • Wednesday, February 15 —Anytime We can sure discuss the Creekside PUD concept layout as well and what they need to be incorporating into their concept plan to meet the SL PUD standards. Jen Jenifer Sorensen East Metro Area Hydrologist (Ramsey and Washington Counties) Division of Ecological and Water Resources Minnesota Department of Natural Resources 1200 Warner Road St Paul, MN 55106 Phone: 651-259-5754 Email: ienifer.sorensen(@state.mn.us Rice Creek Watershed District Administrative Permit Application Status Update THIS IS NOT A PERMIT Permit Application Number: 20-120 Applicant: Joanne Benick (Thommes & Thomas Land Clearing) Project Location: Pin: 08.031.21.33.0001 Application Received: Date of Administrative Action: Current Status: CAPROC Expiration Date: Please note the following: 12/29/2020 02/03/2021 Conditionally Approved Pending Receipt Of Changes (CAPROC) 02/03/2022 • Status - Pursuant to RCWD Resolution 2009-09, this application is being granted CAPROC status administratively after staff review and notice to the RCWD Board of Managers. • You are not authorized to begin site work until all pending items are satisfied as enumerated in the attached Staff Review. If the project is initiated without obtaining an RCWD Permit, it will be stopped by the District Inspector until the permit is obtained. • You have 12 months from the Date of Administrative Action to submit/satisfy all pending items and receive a permit. Otherwise the conditional approval expires and a new application, materials and fee will need to be submitted to the RCWD for consideration. • To satisfy pending items, applicants must submit two (2) paper copies of all submittal items to the District with the exception of plan sheets. Plan sheets must include 1 full-sized copy, and 1 reduced size (11 by 17 inches or smaller) or an electronic file. • Surety - for surety amounts of $5000 or less, the applicant must submit a check made out to the RCWD. For surety amounts over $5000, the applicant must provide the first $5000 in the form of a check and has the option of providing the remainder of the surety amount in the form of a check, Letter of Credit (see website for template) or performance bond. • Easements — if an easement is required per your list of pending items in the attached Engineer's Report, then the legal descriptions of these easements must be prepared by the applicant, reviewed and approved by the District, and then submitted to the County Recorder's Office for recording. An easement template is on the District's website. Wetland Conservation Act Forms - For projects involving wetland impacts and replacement, State law requires the preparation and recording of Wetland Legal Forms for replacement wetlands. Instructions for completing and recording these forms are included in the wetland legal forms document on the website. The wetland legal documents require the applicant to prepare legal descriptions of all replacement wetlands. These legal descriptions and the forms must be reviewed and approved by the District prior to submittal to the County Recorder's Office for recording. Stormwater Operation & Maintenance - For projects involving stormwater ponds and infiltration features, applicants must complete and record a Stormwater Operation and Maintenance Agreement (see website for template) for these features unless a City assumes the maintenance responsibilities of these features as indicated in a letter to the District. An exhibit and/or legal description that clearly delineates and identifies all stormwater and infiltration features must accompany the stormwater operation and maintenance agreement. A draft of this agreement with accompanying exhibit must be submitted to the District for review and approval prior to submission to the County Recorder's office. Authorized Signature: Nick Tomczik, Administrator Date of Issuance: 02/03/2021 cc: City of Hugo; Matt Pavek (Civil Site Group), 4931 W 35th St. Ste 200, St. Louis Park, MN 55416 mpavek@civilsitegroup.com; Joanne Benick (Thommes & Thomas Land Clearing), P.O. Box 35, Scandia, MN 55073 jkbenick42@gmail.com �+ RCWD RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT Permit Application Number: Permit Application Name: Applicant/Landowner: Thommes & Thomas Land Clearing Attn: Joanne Benick P.O. Box 35 Scandia, MN 55073 Ph: 612-910-8062 jkbenick42@gmail.com OFFICIAL DOCUMENT: The Recommendations and Stipulations below are incorporated as binding terms of RCWD Permit 20-120 issued by the Administrator under delegated authority of the RCWD Board of Managers. 20-120 The Meadows at Hugo Permit Contact: Civil Site Group Attn: Matt Pavek 4931 W 35 st. Ste 200 St. Lewis Park, MN 55416 Ph: 612-213-3944 mpavek@civilsitegroup.com Project Name: The Meadows at Hugo Purpose: PDS — Public/Private Drainage System; Single family homes subdivision and development. Work within JD 3 Br 3 Site Size: 32.4± acre parcel / 26.5± acres of disturbed area; existing and proposed impervious areas are 0± acres and 10.11± acres, respectively Location: North of 159t" Street, approximately 2,000± feet west of TH61, Hugo T-R-S: SW '/4, Section 8, T31 N, R21 W District Rule: I Recommendation: CAPROC It is recommended that this Permit Application be given Conditional Approval Pending Receipt of Changes (CAPROC) and outstanding items related to the following items. Conditions to be Met Before Permit Issuance: Rule I — Drainage Systems 1. Applicant must provide a 70-foot easement centered on the ditch specifying and encompassing a District right of maintenance access for the public drainage system 2. Any stormwater pond outlet pipe and/or energy dissipation must be designed that no riprap extends into the ditch channel and that the pipe be designed to accommodate ditch maintenance within the ditch right-of-way (ROW) (no surface structures, enough cover to accommodate traversing equipment, etc.). 3. To protect the Public Drainage System channel and prevent seepage through the ditch bank, the applicant must provide an impermeable lining on the east side slope of the pond, along the border the pond shares with the ditch. 4. The applicant must provide a detail in the plan set stating that the FES installation shall not protrude from the ditch bank and no rip rap shall be placed within the JD 3 Branch 3 channel bottom. Houston Engineering Inc. Page 1 of 3 2/3/2021 RCWD Permit Number 20-120 Administrative 5. Send one final, signed 11 x17 sized plan set to the District, and e-mail a full-sized pdf copy to both the District and the District Engineer. Include a list of changes that have been made since approval by the RCWD Board. Ensure the datum is labeled. Stipulations: The permit will be issued with the following stipulations as conditions of the permit. By accepting the permit, applicant agrees to these stipulations: 1. Provide an as -built survey (NAVD 88) of the invert elevations of culverts discharging into JD3 to verify location and elevation with the approved plans. Exhibits: 1. Plan set containing 35 sheets dated 1-05-2021 and received 1-05-2021 2. Permit application dated 12-29-2020 and received 12-29-2020. 3. Project narrative, including stormwater calculations, dated 1-05-2021 and received 1-05-2021, containing narrative, drainage maps, HydroCAD report for the 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year rainfall events for existing conditions. Findings: Description — This permit has been reviewed by the City of Hugo, which has LGU administration authority for both the RCWD permit program (District Rules C, D, E and F) and WCA based upon the RCWD Resolution 2004-20. This project also triggers Rule I due to the work within the public drainage system right-of-way, which is not administered by the City of Hugo. The applicant is proposing a new development consisting of 87 single-family homes, roads, and utility infrastructure, including a new stormwater outlet to JD 3 Branch 3. Water will drain through a combination of stormsewer and overland to a proposed pond bordering JD 3 Branch 3. No changes to the ditch are proposed beyond the replacement of an existing outlet with a new stormwater outlet and no ditch impediment or flow restricting structures are proposed. The area draining through the proposed pond and into the ditch through the proposed connection includes 10.11± acres of impervious surface. All stormwater draining to JD 3 Branch 3, drains to the Main Trunk, also called Clearwater Creek, an impaired water. Clearwater Creek eventually drains to Peltier Lake, the Resource of Concern. The applicant has submitted a $500 application fee, which corresponds to a Rule I permit review. This permit was deemed complete on 1-5-2021, and thus reviewed under the RCWD 2021 Rules. 2. Stormwater — Rule C is administered by the City of Hugo. 3. Wetlands — The City of Hugo is the LGU for wetlands and therefore administers Rule F. 4. Floodplain — Rule E is administered by the City of Hugo. 5. Erosion Control — Rule D is administered by the City of Hugo. 6. Bridges and Culvert Crossing/Drainage Systems — The applicant is proposing to construct a large stormwater treatment pond adjacent to the public drainage system ROW, with the outlet FES near STA 99+00 on Branch 3 of the Anoka/Washington Judicial Ditch 3 system. The pond contours are outside of the ROW, and no structures are planned on the top of the bank where it could impede future access. Grading is proposed within the ROW but the slopes are within an acceptable range. There is a proposed storm water outlet structure that has a proposed downstream FES invert at elevation at 909.32, which is below the regulatory floodplain elevation in this area (913.24 NAVD 88). No other stabilization feature has been proposed for the outlet invert. Houston Engineering Inc Page 2 of 3 2/3/2021 RCWD Permit Number 20-120 Proposed peak rates to the ditch are required to be equal or less than existing rates. No volumetric analysis was performed as the system is not volume constrained. The information above needs to be submitted, otherwise the project complies with Rule I. 7. Documenting Easements— Applicant must meet the easement obligations for the public drainage system. 8. Maintenance Obligations — Maintenance Obligation documents, including the outlet pipe within the public drainage system ROW, are required under Rule C which is administered by the City of Hugo for this permit. 9. Previous Permit Information — No previous permit information was found for this site. hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Registered Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Katherine MacDonald, MN Reg. No 44590 Dan Bogart, MN Reg. No. 55539 Houston Engineering Inc Page 3 of 3 2/3/2021 The Meadows at Hugo Preliminary Plat/PUD Narrative 1/26/21 Over the past couple of months, we have coordinated with City staff and the DNR in designing "The Meadows at Hugo PUD" project. We are pleased to submit the Meadows at Hugo PUD Preliminary Plat for your consideration. Development Proposal Summary: The development site is 32.93 acres (gross) and has 5.92 of delineated wetlands, for a net area of 27.01 acres. The current site is used as agricultural land. The site is bordered on the west by City undeveloped park property, on the north by undeveloped agricultural land, on the east by County Ditch #3 and undeveloped agricultural land, and on the south by a single-family subdivision. The property is currently zoned Future Urban Service (FES), and is guided in the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plans as Medium Density Residential (MD). We are proposing a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for this project. Our Preliminary Plat shows a total of 87 single family villa lots for a net density of 3.22 units/acre. We are proposing two villa lot and building types. 45 lots will be 50' wide and are designed for 40' wide one-story villa homes. 42 lots will be 44' wide and are designed for 29' wide two-story villa homes. We are proposing 25' front setbacks, 30' rear setbacks, 5' interior side and 15' street side setbacks for the 50' wide one-story villa lots and 25' front setbacks, 30' rear setbacks, 7.5' interior side and 15' street side setbacks for the 44' wide two- story villa lots. We are requesting PUD flexibility to achieve these lot standards and dimensions as shown in the table below as compared to standard R-3 single family zoning. Please note, this project is guided medium density which would allow for (R-4) townhomes up to 6 units per acre, 25' front building setbacks and 70% impervious coverage. PUD Flexibilitv Requests Required (R3) Proposed 2-Story Villa 1-Story Villa Minimum lot size 10,400 sq. ft. 5,400 sq. ft. 6,750 sq. ft. Minimum lot width at front setback line 80 ft. 44 ft. 50 ft. Minimum lot depth 100 ft. 135 ft. 135 ft. Minimum front yard building setback 30 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. Minimum side yard building setback 10 ft. 7.5 ft. 5 ft. Minimum rear yard building setback 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. Maximum lot area covered by impervious surface 50% Up to 55% Up to 60% DNR Shoreland Overlay: After meeting and working with the DNR, we have designed the Shoreland Overlay District area (300' from County Ditch #3) to meet the DNR requirements for the Residential PUD requirements. We are proposing 25 single family Villa lots and maintaining 50% open space, see DNR residential PUD Analysis spreadsheet below. 18301- Hugo SF Residential Residential PUD Analysis - River with GD Shoreland Classification, Sewered Lots Density and allowable unit calculation: Fill In This Fill In This Fill In This Calculated Calculated Fill In This Field Field Field Field Field Field Allowable Minimum Lot Bonus Units per Tier Total Unsuitable Suitable Size for GD River Base Density with Bonus Proposed Tier Area Area Area (Sewered) Density Factor Density Units 75' wide (min) 1 415,327 0 415,327 (1377If.} 15.4 1.5 27.5 26.0 Total 1 415,327 1 ❑ 1 415,327 0% 1 1❑❑% * * * Note: Per 6.26 of code min. lot width of 5F lot(5) i5 75'. There are no minimum lot sf requirements for rivers and streams These lots will meet all DNR PUD Shoreland Overlay District standards for single family Villa lots. Our proposed PUD maintains, restores and creates a significant amount of wetland area, natural environmental features, and public open space. We designed an internal trail system that will connect to the future trails in the City park property to the west. Our PUD will connect to Farham Ave. N. to the southwest with a public road through the City park property. Per our discussions during Sketch Plan approval, we will pay for the site grading and road improvements on the City park land, and for the City to pay for the utility improvements on the park property. The Preliminary Plat also shows two future street connections to the north, that will ultimately connect to 165t" St. N. We are not showing a street connection to the east as this property is zoned Business Park (BP) and guided as Industrial (IND). Comprehensive Plan Amendment: As shown on our Preliminary Utility Plan, we are proposing to connect to the Metropolitan Council's interceptor sewer at our northwest property corner. We would then extend the City's 36" trunk sanitary sewer line to our northeast property corner. This would require an update to the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This project proposes to amend the comprehensive plan to gain access to trunk utilities (Sanitary Sewer and Water) for this project as well as the future extension of trunk utilities to this area of the City. The current comprehensive plan shows connections to trunk sanitary sewer at 165t" Street (one parcel north of our proposed connection point. Through conversations with City staff, it was determined that our proposed trunk sanitary sewer connection point would serve as well as the original proposed location on 1651h street for the surrounding properties and would enable this property to develop. Trunk water is also served at our southwestern property corner near the water tower and will extend trunk water to our north property line. This is a better location for trunk water connection in order to develop with the comprehensive plan. Otherwise, the water would need to "leap frog" two parcels to reach 165th. The trunk sanitary sewer and watermain will be constructed as part of this development and extended to the project boundaries. This proposed trunk utility connection plan and modification to the comprehensive plan is logical, prudent and efficient to begin the extension of City trunk utilities to this area of the City. PUD 6enefitsc Our development plan will provide several benefits over the standard medium density (townhome) zoning: 1. An efficient use of land for single family residential construction that enables greater community engagement and interaction. 2. Design is an environmentally sensitive proposal with less density than would be allowed under medium density guidelines and attached townhomes. 3. Providing landscaping that exceeds the City minimum requirements. 4. Incorporating architectural design guidelines for homes in the development. 5. Villa product types that are appealing to different home buyers and enhancing visual interest of the proposed neighborhoods. 6. Open space that promotes outdoor engagement and visual connectivity between residential units and their surroundings. 7. Construction of a Public Street to provide access to the City park land at developer's expense. 8. Construction of a trunk sanitary sewer connection to begin the expansion of development potential in the area of the city with cost sharing with the City. 9. The extension of the City's trail system thru the subdivision at developer's expense. These design details all demonstrate our commitment to providing a high -quality development worthy of receiving the PUD designation. The creation of non-standard setbacks and lot sizes for the villa lots requires the PUD zoning designation, which is the primary reason for our PUD request. The proposed PUD subdivision creates a variety of lot types allowing for a diverse type of housing. Thus, the proposed subdivision facilitates the mixed -use development goals sought after in the PUD Planned Unit Development zoning standards. In addition, the proposed PUD will preserve to the maximum extent possible the site's natural environmental features, and provide for trail connections to the City park. In addition to the PUD benefits described above we also considered stormwater reuse for irrigation for the site. Stormwater Reuse for the purposes of irrigation is somewhat common in the City of Hugo and for good reason. Conservation and sustainability. We have considered the possibility of stormwater re- use for this project and have decided it is not feasible for this site for the following reasons. 1. The site has an extensive wetland system that needs all the stormwater runoff to be sustained. The existing wetlands on the site constitute approximately 18% of the site area. Due to the creation of new wetlands as part of the project development, at completion of the project the area of wetlands will be approximately 21% of the site area. We are increasing wetland area which drives a demand for stormwater. Stormwater sustains the wetlands. 2. The stormwater ponding for this site is directly connected to the wetland basins. All stormwater runoff is needed so the wetland (existing and newly created) will not dry out. 3. If the stormwater basins are used for irrigation this water will be diverted away from the wetlands and cause a wetland loss. 4. The change in runoff volume (from row crops to single family homes) is not enough of an increase to offset the loss of runoff volume to a water re -use irrigation system. 5. The amount of runoff volume needed to sustain an irrigation system will not allow enough runoff in both volume and frequency to leave the ponds and feed the wetlands. 6. Additional water reuse calculations and reasoning is contained in the project stormwater management report. Phasing plan and proposed development schedule: The current" phase line" is shown on the preliminary plans. The project (home sites, streets and utilities) will be developed in two phases (west and east). The entire project will be graded in one phase however which is needed to implement the complex wetland mitigation and stormwater management plan as well as earthwork balance. The west side of the development will be phase 1 and will be constructed in 2021. The east side of the development will be Phase 2 and will be constructed in 2023. Housing Types: Golden Valley Land Co. is partnering with Centra Homes as the exclusive builder for this project. As discussed above, we are proposing two housing types that will fit on the proposed lots: 40' wide single level homes (on 50' wide lots) and 29' wide two story homes (on 44' wide lots). Both housing types will be slab on grade. We provided sample elevations of these homes in this narrative. 40' Wide Single Level Homes: These architecturally designed homes will range in size from 1,382 square feet up to 1,903 square feet with a variety of elevations. The interiors will have 1-3 bedrooms and 2.5 bathrooms and 2 car garages. We will work with the new homeowner to select exterior and interior options to create a home for them. Sample elevations and floor plans are provided in Exhibit A We have found that these homes appeal primarily to the empty nest buyers but also many other buyer types (single professionals, move down buyer, etc.) like having a single level home. The homes have been designed with special attention to the elevations to enhance the streetscape. The living space of the home has been focused on the rear of the house to allow home buyers to enjoy the open space that the majority of the lots will enjoy. The 40' wide single level homes will be built on lots with a 5' side yard - thus 10' between homes. In discussion with City Staff a few questions were asked about the spacing of 10' between homes. We know of many neighborhoods in the Twin Cities area that are building homes with 10' between homes. To help Staff, Commission and Council better visualize this spacing, we have provided some pictures (See Exhibit B) of the 10' spacing. In addition, Centra Homes is building in a few subdivisions that have this guideline and we can provide a list of neighborhoods if anyone would like to drive through some of these neighborhoods. 29' Wide Two Story Homes: These homes will range in size from 1,777 square feet up to 2,337 square feet. These homes all have three bedrooms and two and a half bathrooms. The larger floor plan has an optional fourth bedroom that homeowners can select. Each home will also have a two car attached garage. These homes are designed with young growing families in mind but we have found a variety of buyers such as single parents, professionals and move down buyers. While working with architects we have tried to minimize the garages by having living space over the garage and front stoops. We have provided sample elevations and floor plans in Exhibit C. Exhibit A: 40' Wide Single Level Homes Sample Elevations and Floor Plans (on following pages) 1— 2 Beds • 1.5 — 2 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,382 fsf Elevation A - Farmhouse Elevation B - Colonial Single -Level Home FEATURES: Island Kitchen and Pantry Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet Flex Room AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE: Extended Patio Covered Patio Cabinet and Sink in Laundry Room Gas Fireplace with Built-in Cabinets Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom Barn Door at Primary Bath Deluxe Primary Bath French Doors at Flex Room Second Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room Stone Accents Across Front of Home Elevation C - Cottage Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options! CENTRAHOMES LLC CentraHomes.com Single -Level Home 1— 2 Beds • 1.5 — 2 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,382 fsf Farmhouse floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation. Optional Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room Bedroom 2 11' 1" x 11' 3 CENTRA HOMES LLC Optional Primary Bath Shower with Tile Surround CentraHomes.com A Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping r and elevation renderings are artist's concells, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. Effective 11/30/20. Equal Housing Opportunity. 2 — 3 Beds • 2 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,611 fsf Elevation A - Farmhouse Elevation B - Colonial Single -Level Home FEATURES: Island Kitchen and Pantry Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet Flex Room AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE: Extended Patio Covered Patio Mud Room Drop Zone Mud Room Bench with Cubbies Cabinet and Sink in Laundry Room Gas Fireplace with Built-in Cabinets Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom Barn Door at Primary Bath Deluxe Primary Bath French Doors at Flex Room Third Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room Stone Accents Across Front of Home Elevation C - Cottage Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options! CENTRAHOMES LLC CentraHomes.com Single -Level Home 2 — 3 Beds • 2 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,611 fsf Farmhouse floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation. i i i I I I Optional 1 Utend:d Patio Optional Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room Bedroom 3 10'4" x 117' CENTRA HOMES LLC Optional Primary Bath Shower with Tile Surround Optional Deluxe Primary Bath CentraHomes.com A Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping r and elevation renderings are artist's concells, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. Effective 11/30/20. Equal Housing Opportunity. 2 — 3 Beds • 2.5 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,903 fsf Elevation A - Farmhouse Elevation B - Colonial Single -Level Home FEATURES: Island Kitchen and Walk -In Pantry Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet Flex Room AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE: Extended Patio Covered Patio Mud Room Drop Zone Mud Room Bench with Cubbies Cabinet and Sink in Laundry Room Gas Fireplace with Built-in Cabinets Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom Barn Door at Primary Bath Deluxe Primary Bath French Doors at Flex Room Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room Stone Accents Across Front of Home Elevation C - Cottage Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options! CENTRAHOMES LLC CentraHomes.com Exhibit B Sample Pictures of Single Level Homes with 10' between Homes MMMMMMM Exhibit C 29' Wide Two Story Homes Sample Elevations and Floor Plans (on following pages) Single -Level Home 2 — 3 Beds • 2.5 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,903 fsf Farmhouse floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation. Opt. Deluxe Opt. Primary Bath Primary Bath Shower with Tile 0 m CENTRA HOMES LLC Opt. Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room IBedroom 2 4�J1, Bedroom 3 oo. CentraHomes.com A Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping r and elevation renderings are artist's concells, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. 12/1/20. Equal Housing Opportunity. 3 Beds • 2.5 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,777 fsf Elevation A - Farmhouse Elevation B - Craftsman Two -Story Home FEATURES: Covered Porch with Entry Closet Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet Convenient Upper -Level Laundry AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE: Extended Patio/Covered Patio Gas Fireplace Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom Barn Door at Primary Bath Primary Bath Shower with Tile Surround Laundry Cabinet and Sink Stone Accents Across Front of Home Elevation C - Prairie Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options! CENTRAHOMES LLC CentraHomes.com Two -Story Home 3 Beds • 2.5 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,777 fsf Prairie floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation. r------------ I Opt Extended Patio I I Opt. Built -In Cabinets Opt. Fireplace I I I Great Room I I 14'11" x 15' I I Patio 6'xT ---- `� Dining Area 10'6" x 13' Kitchen i i Mud 137' x 13' 11 Room Optional Primary Bath Shower with Tile Surround CENTRA HOMES LLC Entry II Covered I I II Porch I I I, Main Level Garage 21'8" x 20'8" Mech. 'Laundry Upper Level r il�r--. _— I Opt. Sink Opt. Barn Door I II III R_________________________ _i I I III Optional Tray Vault L I I I I Primary Suite I I 16'8" x 13' I I ------------------------- I I I I ------------------� Open to Below Bedroom 2 12'4" x 10T' Bedroom 3 12'4" x 10T' CentraHomes.com A Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping r and elevation renderings are artist's concepts, me not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. Effective 8/11/20. Equal Housing Opportunity. 3 Beds • 2.5 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 2,063 fsf Elevation A - Farmhouse Elevation B - Craftsman Two -Story Home FEATURES: Island Kitchen and Pantry Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet Loft AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE: Extended Patio/Covered Patio Mud Room Bench & Cubbies Mud Room Drop Zone Gas Fireplace Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom Barn Door at Primary Bath Deluxe Primary Bath Laundry Cabinet and Sink Stone Accents Across Front of Home Elevation C - Prairie Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options! CENTRAHOMES LLC CentraHomes.com Two -Story Home 3 Beds • 2.5 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 2,063 fsf Farmhouse floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation. I Opt. E#ended Patio Main Level Patio 3'x6' Great Room 12'6" x 16' Opt. Fireplace Upper Level Optional Primary Bath Shower with Tile Surround CENTRA HOMES LLC Optional Tray Vault Dining Area 12' x 12' Pantry Kitchen Mud 12'x16' pp� 11 Room' Loft 12' x 11' Entry Mechanical Garage 22'8" x 19'2" Covered Porch Open to Below 0 Primary Suite'I L--- jo 13'6" x 16' 1 Bedroom 211'"x 12'2" Bedroom 3 11'3" x 107' i "------------ T�-n ,opt. earn Door n � _ i CentraHomes.com A Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping r and elevation renderings are artist's concells, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. Effective 7/31/20. Equal Housing Opportunity. 3 — 4 Beds • 2.5 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 2,329 — 2,337 fsf Elevation A - Farmhouse Elevation B - Craftsman Two -Story Home FEATURES: Island Kitchen and Large Walk -In Pantry Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet Loft AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE: Extended Patio/Covered Patio Mud Room Bench & Cubbies Mud Room Drop Zone Gas Fireplace with Built-in Cabinets Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom Deluxe Primary Bath / Barn Door Laundry Cabinet and Sink Fourth Bedroom in Lieu of Kid's Loft Stone Accents Across Front of Home Elevation C - Prairie Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options! CENTRAHOMES LLC CentraHomes.com Two -Story Home 3 —4 Beds • 2.5 Baths 9 2 Garage Bays • 2,329 — 2,337 fsf Farmhouse floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation. Main Level :'�----_�' ------ Opt Opt. Opt. Fireplace T I I E#ended Patio Banc -In Covered I I Cabinets I I Porch I I Entry II I I Great Room I I I 15'6" x 15' Opt. Bench w/ Pantry Mud r---- 6' Patio Room 2"x3' II Optional Bedroom 4 11'1" x 11'1" Optional Bedroom 4 with Walk -In Closet Dining Area10'6"x13' E�Lj I I Kitchen 14'3" x 11' I I Bedroom 2 11' x 11'10" Bedroom 3 10'9" x 111" Garage 22'8" x 197' Study 10'11" x 11' / Open to Below Imo? Lj I Op[. Sink I -- IMechanical Kids' Loft111 x 11'1" Optional Primary Bath Shower with Tile Surround CENTRA HOMES LLC L Upper Level Barn Door ---------------------- ---------------- Primary Suite; 15'8" x 13'8" } { Optional Tray Vault--------------------- CentraHomes.com A Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping r and elevation renderings are artist's cor lfs, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. Effective 7/31/20. Equal Housing Opportunity. PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTES PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, Washington County, Minnesota. DATE OF PREPARATION: 12-04-2020 APPLICANT: Golden Valley Land Company Peter Knaeble 612-309-9215 6001 Glenwood Ave, Golden Valley, MN 55422 BENCHMARKS: Elevations are based on the NGVD 29 Datum. Site Benchmark is the top nut hydrant located on the north side of 159th St N, having an elevation of 926.69 feet. As shown hereon. EXISTING ZONING: FUS (Future Urban Service) PROPOSED ZONING: PUD (MDR) AREAS: The Gross land area is 1,745,448 +/- square feet or 40.07 +/- acres. NOTE: For Proposed Lot Areas, See Site Plan FLOOD ZONE: This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27163C0136E, effective date of February 3, 2010. Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565 rory@civilsitegroup.com Linetype & Symbol Legend 1=0 FIBER OPTIC SIGN ❑A AIR CONDITIONER O UTILITY MANHOLE GAS GASMAIN ® BOLLARD ( SANITARY MANHOLE WATERMAIN QE ELECTRIC MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER sT STORM MANHOLE >> STORM SEWER ® CATCH BASIN o FLAG POLE GHu OVERHEAD UTILITIES Q FLARED END SECTION [F] ROOF DRAIN TEL TELEPHONE LINE ( GAS VALVE FT TELEPHONE BOX ELE ELECTRIC LINE QT TELEPHONE MANHOLE HANDICAP SYMBOL cTv CABLE LINE x CHAINLINK FENCELINE eT ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER �' HYDRANT 11 WOODEN FENCELINE ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL Ow WATER MANHOLE o o- GUARDRAIL © CABLE TV BOX g WATER VALVE ° ° a CONCRETE SURFACE OE ELECTRICAL METER -0- POWER POLE I © GAS METER GUY WIRE PAVER SURFACE • FOUND IRON MONUMENT _A CONIFEROUS TREE BITUMINOUS SURFACE O SET IRON MONUMENT 0SURFACE DECIDUOUS TREE (0CAST IRON MONUMENT GRAVEL/LANDSCAPE PRELIMINARY PLAT: THE MEADOWS AT HUGO N89029'46"E 1319.69 109.30 to 144.51 \ / In 192.22 30.00 30.00 to 75.81 to 72.14 to 92.52 L049.36 30.03 30.03 L=4°51'25" 397.86 � �/ I 5.91 N N \� 73.12 -- = N N rn N N �N - - N 25.01 - \ �a I ,y I - - - - - - ----- 7 M vo I\I 00 ; I 30 30 N89°29'46"E140.10 �7 Xa� 5 I �I� 1 I� I - oI I I1 2 I IM 4 / /`' `° I I - ° \ co o iO v o -9 48'27" I v < I I I 2\ WET o o � o I 1 I h I I~ / //`v C) " Soso 2 5 >t A=2 02'15' ti v rn o� / ��\ \ / o/ 0 - I z W 3 °col oO L-------� I� 5 0 \ ry 90.54 - �L - - -4.62 = -� --- -- { Q I �� I IM d� M/ir; - - - - - - _ - N 50.23 XIS 0 \\ 01 Cry / 11 ° 'lp o L N89°29'46' E 210.78 30 3 8 o r�i a N oLO / ,�Q �1 90 I IF o ^I I� to // M/// � 89 29'46"W 142.25 20 p81 /' / \ 9 `�v�- ^ I to - I IO o� ni / co / �� 5 Y 1 '$0„ 24 I o et ro O 3" ° o o rn / C N I \ Xa°` ( ,250 23 ` �� �� A`�c� 59., I Iz dA I h /! / /� �O / / L - 5� - - - - �' l� 63 i / ^t / X a rn !n 5 4,/.��\g / 4\.ls �8 �-� L �t / Q /� S89°29'46"W 147.64 o �r / o j sr 5 8 G t� �Z n a N �o\ ut N l) rQ 9\ Q o �p 0° ^ M X� ti \ p r+ I ~ ti6 / L� o j S89 29'46"W I �/ �O \ >L Y ��'' 2 3 / ry '- / / % / 09 0 '"' I ; O\ \\ ° N / 0L 00 S�, 33 4� �� I •05 6 �� S' 4 0 co ° 91 / / /� XoS. X<>,�,. M 9.,\\ ,90 M M WE 6/ / / o L5 , O - I' �d,ZS / 4 3 �h �\ _�-'- - - / // M / / // 0 I Oi 9, \, / _ o �/ o �\ 1 7s \ \ II s I 0 / /ti O I I jKcl 4i' nj o S89 29'46"W 157.53 a e - I GG \ o2 L) 6 O �6'0 O 6�/ cb 7 p /` ,o. / I o OJT \\ t6 vt 4 \ I 5 / p/ L of I o0 `�. N /�i \ 'C 5 k 1/ I 0 O W O / C a\.>9\\ \�T_ a \ I I O \6�02 rL \. 0� o 1g11 h� b 4 290 M \ ZO„ h p= 2 2 0 IN 1'X -914- 41, vl zg V / \ / /'y4''ti• `y i /� �� S�1 v 9�8 \�' /' ,� 1�� 1.75 - - ��� / 5� \ gig '. IN7g o Z. O 32'� 4 -- 0. 42 I h // tx p' / d / \�` 2 r I i 3� - - - - - - // L 0,6 65 `08'41 „ 9 c - T - �6>0 11 \ /S \ o y1 / / (O Y � I 11 a of � - / _ _ M I X W R` 4g4 �' , • 50 / ti/ / rMj N M I M I I^ \ /ice/ ° \ _ 7 g" a O co - = /'� 1 S89 29'46"W 165.90 d_ �\ p0 P / / o N `° `� o o M ;p N o --J $� +ti Ch ofo n MO �%' ti ♦ Zoo i �, ♦ I I d� 35°45411 / 0053 2� l 'I " o0 lri o' /b / S 264 2 1 I \ _ Jr 4O4 37.45 r N66 0 00 oo ° cP,, b / p w I II I I M N n I ~' CO S 46 2° t \� ' 03,' I I I X e / J ab e o 20 I Z' v 6 t� to a--------�'' 2j O e e X Xg, Xo, �.� 26" \ i' �� 0' ° / / I '� II - / O \ 2 I ,5 / X g 1 \° Al,6y \ I I I a M 's s 46 °� f� •° ' ✓dco�F�P O �/ / p1 V ° V Ln 'O n/ \ S89°29'46"W 158.12 co` ''20 00 °�. 1 s° ^� �` 3 ° I 4 �I I 5 �� M�oM �\ sO,,9 $>o\I O I N89°09'07"W 146.57v tOQr°� \\ '�'%odso O I I I I NIA o ' N p �/i=17°36'07" 20 / �_ °8"� \ 6 11.91 M /� o� y3 J o a N n 67.59 / I +. L --A=20°03'49 IN 1= \ POFaraEe 6 I pI I I a to / / 1 o 4,9o \ _ _ _ w i I� O o g F to z 5.63 --I-' /_ / 111.44 �g6 7/ 0 0 0 9og _ _ - N89 09'07"W 148.63 I r1 1' O O \ 790 68.62 76.27 \ �:�- iA6"\1`1 I o cn 6.•r �1" ry /� J \ I / / M o S , _ o I 7 Ip o I N Ofo� �� 51'47"E - - - / °2g 0=2Io38'48„!' f /r� <� �w l Ed aof Water - 92.47 01 N90°00'00"E �0 57 _ I I I N89°09'07"W 148_6 J� o I � `^ p �/ M 0 144.89 0 30 30 0� i (� 56.67 / I _ --Edge _ - o o ET 12_114 Ln 4I 6 14 01 1 7 / i Z //1� d'r p �� �� / / 2 59 I_ --Edge of Wetland a elineated g5= I O - 18.62 v 30 I 30 /J 0.,5 M �I / / / 40� 1 / �A II� ` �� _ by Jacobson Envi�mental o I o I 0=8°06'18'_ �- j o I/ / �6"W 11 0� In \ / g5 X,.:.1 II 92e2 2ge X� I I I -25.46 -�\ t 1W 110350� i o N90 00'00"E 144.89 7m 574o2g yoh�h IN k 92 XI rn I� I p„ W o O UTLOT 12X112 �I I� �� i p J �13 I111 z IIp I N89�09'O�W 15�. 1�1 0o t>, 0 1 �O o �I I� �I 18 /Di / \ \ o I I I °90 a� / a2� /a 6 , 1 W WET 12- # 55 14°33'56"/ 0 N a�. •� El �� ° W So 0`26n / / / / �� o 'a I Xo°. o X X X \ 7 N= yU` ,5 I o I 3 1 I Ln� o \ X w 4536 - �Sv o� rn _ / o =s15._ Quo Ip � � 70.00 / A6 140 l0�ln o T--- WET E _x �O I �7�029 I� \ X1�k6� I I I oo I N89 0907"W 52/ / / e1.474- --- 722 1 6 I 100.00 17 I ��jjg° o 1I1I 1 o g ,- ? o �2 -------- rn J xl 91 I 62.54 3 ��, I9`oT�� y _1O - -p% �Oa 2�/ / ie \\ D�jOp 0 - N90°00'00"E �I / IIz ' I� 4� I\ g," i WET 12 E O� v/�' Ln� / / / /w 140'10UV�o B 1 III I I I �"X �4°, 9"0 X Xo / XXo I I I I S89 09'07"E L� / s /� I I 6 / _I- I III X ` ° ' °/ vv _� 70-00 �4°2g46 LNn Xo, za 140.25 J B „° ti �� S o x I 5 �915� _ 3o D�` 5 QO \ �9 1 1 L p O '3p `G 5 05 �61 O y Jacobson Envir / X \ III X 9\ z �,� o` �~r� �' 2 IM o I II I \ c�3� \ quo �� DC0 30 I 30 r.l /0� �� g, a5 III M O h inl w 1g0.1 p 6i I III I I �o 506 55�1 3 / .9 'y I/ � ,6 a'� a 4 t ti�O ,�\ Dti �I I I /A°2g 46 % \ IIII \ Xo 2 X A oGJ� 00 \ l/ o ° 57 i \ \ X 9 6. N90 00'00"E 140 00 � 15 I ,ago\ ao2�18� a C5 xvL/ 02 2 oGg \ X ' 01 � - \N g2° �2 % X e24� g2 a48 / E. / rn'v / X �� /j c�V X I 2� \ E, / x °�o / o \ �'1 I X °0 X X x 92 FO I X g220$ �2� 1 X O,�O /X 020'�° I 90r 00 53 N (tl �' g`LO-�6 k9 I 21 x �\ X°2 Xo I ET ETW�ET k J XX��a +//�� WET / I ?-'v ET\ I 0`d I 5 X9 X� 8. k WFT Wire Fence Xa6 \ IX�z x9 x�X o4a g2°5° X10 g o Via/ xgll WET x \ 65 X/ / I \ \ X o I x N9 X °2° 92 2, ( / X g2 ° W x -918- � g / WET 3.43 �\ X _� 923- / % e9 px rt =0°47' �,922- - E� Xaz°�o �X WqT g x WET %-250 .b T � �� I x�z�5 2 SC r F - _ N ,� F \ x N �C9I�Rim 919.16 / } I. o� w , INV= �\ 91 / O , SMH S (0 Rim=9 . 5 S Rim- Inv=916.0 92� \ --97 I x 9 O 6 ✓ \92` $92 x x X �", 2 X \ \ \ 5 \ �.q 8 --921--_922- �/ �3 g2 0� T � g1� I / I r 01 / / / X,6°� X °� I X/•�c9 2 O \ �,5�% M of - - - - - - �p Ln N / /9° 22 O TLOT F / ° / /' \ 1� 5� 7 0 10 O [V 'n / / / / 10 O X o�h I I J 61 ° 5 1 05 I I I/ / 11 140' 2 ��/ /\ s CD O �' v' / NI 't I / 1 W IN \ O 0 0 / S 7°�/ / m '00 Q�/' �titi ��N90°00'00"E 140.00 J`r ^ 14029 46 Ln ^ \ '^ I k, N I �/ / Amon - A� �s 14 I I o 9� P. %3i / �so '00 /A NN. \� wI -- ---� 4\ Iw o /� rn '? Ln > �2 0p^ tSt�t \v' 0 �I I� \ o / / / / i0 to w X o ' M I J /gD �0p I p,ky \ 9� oI v N90°00'00"E 140.00 I o � �6„w 1A0' I0 o x10) / to o I O p 00 ti� /66 / �Oo3 �k�^ �9\\ c9�\\ a L------J z 5,7go29 13 ILn p o I �9e of Delineated c 6`9 �Ik lJ` /' �• \ Ct \ \ 7 �� V)I ppl / Q / I I / X / XLr) 9� as Delineated p by Jacobson �' / O 2 \ ..0, \ \ 12 CD O / / p O I I I CD Environmental S Q/' 7� \\ /' I 4I I I / -1 O U T LOT B z I O I I -915-\ \ \ \ y \ \ ��o\ \ N90°00'00"E 140.00 I LNn / / 10 o cn / z �v' OOi\ 2c� \ 6 \\ Igo--------0 4611w 140 IN �� \ 5 ��\ tQ \ v\� �------gyp S�42g1 �915�/ II I I 29 6 ° _ \ I/ O % / / I �� vmoo �� �� v v � 13 p 12 / J 9 �62 / II I� I xX X, �z� ^) y h t) \ Q 6\ R I� I� oo / X I I I o X°9r /\ O• M�/O\�4 /j.--ll LN90°00'00"E 140.00 Jv I N NI 3 / / / / � / I I � �- r�^ \\ ° tJ•/ Edge of Wetland as N �� tiv /n \ \ \ \ �\ \ d� \ ka/ /00 $/ � - - - - - - 0 / '46" 1 IN g,° 20 / I I J A\2/ by Jacobson Delineated I �/ \w) \� �O\ \� /Q 1 o� I �4029 Ln X/ I I ' I 0 / Environmental N89°09'&7" W-142.29 1�v �9o\'ro 1 \� \ �o "'o\ \ k�%, �\ 7 LL'I vI 14 I a �5 1 1 k ° k _ _ _ / Q \ tJ \• \� V o O / Xo Da/ I E 2 WET _55 WET - - -� �)z Lu L N90 00'00"E 140.00 J / 1 I "' - i9 SB 8x; o=9°51'30" i \ \ Oo �� 1 \ I 0 % A• 16 o I / / / i WET 8_ o I \ p \), Qc� A SSt V A ��% �� .vL1 V A o _ _ _ _ _ / 10� - -/ I o ys� 4 I 26.67 \tS` O, \ \ S t v - / /1, 140 25 -- WET ET - \vF 3 / / 1q6 \I1 ��• I 9 . V- T 64 N7�8_65 -7 _ 17.46 y' of r, 1 �o 029 N X _ \ ct \ s� I\ ^ 60 2 IV \ fl 0 o M 0-0 15 'n S74 / Ln °k� 9 5 \ SB 8-2�61e q \ 9. \ / 0 5 \c� °\ Q I 9 31 30 I 30 Io; X 9, �X `91 o S89°0�07rE 140.0� o �' \ 1 1 \ )z p� \\ \ fl.j `� \a r `,'2 p2' I 10 - o I o 1 O 1 \s h� '�� �k •' 2 t \� 1\ 9 _' o g'36,1 �o I� '\ � 6 Io I �'° o \ (C3 9\ \ `t `�0\ 9 �\ \ `��: \ /�=19 0 - - 43.6s Ln -� ' I 2-28 -� P' 00 \ 1 92g2 X S89°09'07"E 140.00 oJ'' \ s \° tx / �� \ 0\ \1�, ly \c� h I(/ 76.91 I L - - - = -� J T 12�29 2 o M IIIII� 1 X I I-------j I °6, \C �� �`°' �9 \V/ 9\ \ p \�y \ /\, I 52 02 II II I �,� x 2 X o IuI,I \ o, WET 8_80 \�d,)7k�� >\ 1311 I 7°3.68 r - o - '' :2r\ = z I c° I X eared - 4 ��., 5 U \ �, \r 00 II N90 00'00"E7 0 S89 29'46 W 135.01 T 12-ET012_3� I I`III� T 8 0 I L�89 09'07"E 140.00 I 2i, t< o >7 R= 0 to I �I 9 o.a� o. o III WET 8_ etla°das ei o / r0 • \ O \ S7\ Ct �. \ / 20 I n - � \ .9\ \17Q 1 ° \ \ Ln Ln_ e� 9- III IL of En 1 �' I S89029'46"W 135.01 / 1 WE�Tz- 2 I III I_j o �p �o \ 9� \ S \ ? Y v 2 v 43.68 L------- T? I p 1 °�.� 'Q\ 0- % \ 62� A� \ - ' _ _ - 12 j. 1 9 II W T - 1�y/ != 8 4 Ip C0 I h* \ � vt� vt vb, d3 \ rJ�- \ ' 030 1 � 647 � - - - - -1, � ,5- 5 L I" � � S89°09'07"E 140.00 v `90 \ l2\\ Fl "�sz,, \ /� \.1Cn0 I \�I\ �=21°36 57 I oo� p 19.56� WET 1 -----J MI r \ -1\ \ 2%� \ \ 30 30 8 2 ( ----- wI rn \ �\ 4 tk�.. \c> I- I Ln / X\ I 1 'JI J/i ET8_9 o -Ip r) N \��; 9 \'4 y 1 O %\ �� So o I S89°29'46"W 151.53 9 \ L-------� / S �/ p p �, I \\ • �\\\ I e � tig0° ly \ ° \� I� I �� 90 ` 1 �I$I�I �� -// w�r a -a 589°09'07"E 140.OJ� o I I OUT�OT F Qo \ j/ I \ /��'�� C\1 \� o S 1\ \0 6 h = I n o 7 -\ 6 N Q�F1x\ E ------ I \ / / /\ �0 \\ 6'\ M N�L=1 13'58" \ out J WET 4 WE 8-7Xa a i o a1 / Xo Ln M N M N o \ a \g2 O \ 0 , X �2� \ x WET 8_49 0,2°° WET 8-48 X� X 912.05 .VET 8 72 WET OT 8_47 WET _74 T 8_71 WET 8 7 WET 8 76 WET 8_46 �a11J3 X WET'8 9141;0 WETS 7 WET 8T 8_4 T S 1\ / WET 8_41 - WE� L WETT / \ X 1I lr� x� % 0 I ` o l' �' o \-z I Ip rn 0.73 .r a7 w T 8- x / 1 1 I i o 3 'j2 (1J 06a 12.92 914- p ET 1% V \ J \� \ p Nip �L/'--------� 03 `� N I �j `wET 4 I 2 Ip I 1s� 9sg� ��� jo�� J Q\x2�'S \mod' cP., \ \ \ ✓ J o i, M S89 29'46"W 177.21 5 (� \ - 9 Xg o \ \ S89°09'07"E 140.00 \, w^ . 1 O 1 �� \ \ \ \ / a '° \ - -0 45n- - - - - oo o /off 1� ro Q\ / II \ 33 4 \ ,-A=67 - - - - - -I -917� o ° \\_ / ��3 000� \\1' 1j d /,\\ 2 \ / 5 % / uJ al \\ --�T.� 40.09 31,77 6 / to IIII �\ rn I'i I o Zc\5 %`\\ / �A6\\ v�\\ v�69 \ / 0 2�\ c p=30o20 19 21•80v- \.52•p3 LX-0°34'28" 1 0 1 �t\� 2�0 \ < S9\\ v�j\\ > L61 1/ 0 0 60 66 / i� - - - - - >510op0'02' III \ Xo1 X9� X94° X° X 1 0 2.81 I� 30 - �� 170. tt� \�'R rS\\ 3 Qc' \�k/q2 71�9 �/ i6 0 rj •Q j y 7- - o - °W 147.62 1, I 30 /� I /°r \ 1 00 \1 0 S89 29'46 1 r ' I -----J ' �d °16 M/\ O �9: orvo N / i III IIIII \ / \ 3 o / �0=50°33'48" I 137.22 20 0195 C \ O \S 4�\ n-----�/ ~ ^ Y 5 20.27- I 06 /00 �° \ \° 2 4j / o M N /I 52.95 - \ co 66c M I o j %Z50 \vtR 01 - 0 7 N90°00'00"E I-- - - - - - w I o5. �- PO \ \r� 2 �, �� 3 M I x / k --L- 0 �`r \> >, S s Q z Q 60.00 0• \ o o rr 9\2 42 �2 a X st2. I-----189_74 - - - -E sz60 r� S \ \� 1 90 y� a' 0 6 oD1 S 8 9 29'46"W 139.52� Ln o I( III / g x o2 X9 �g Xg,2 SB I 77 p N89°40'02"E I p oL\ \ 1 \ �� 1 e s L pcb 00 / -dam 0 r SB 13-UP I 9, \_ Q 0 /ti 60 2 / o I I M I I M �'2$ �O I SS� \ �3gos0ss °6, �, D/ �' y^ \ Z$9 g2g„ 80.97 , F- 0-0 -I r 0-0 \ / 4 v in I �'n �/ M R \ R 3� 1 r /� 4xx Sao \ \ / SZgo 6' ZZ of /�, ti _ o 36' III X x x x° x 9 X 9,2 o O I i� ' o M 2\ \ c10 s�\ \ 44" o g, g, ,2 4 °� I I I I I I I o Ln I /QJ I o4, !�° °y ^� I I� °� �o\ \ �1s \\ � �' I f o o W / S2 29� ie of Wetland as -- �j r\, rl• W \ \ r\, ° I I I I I 3 I Lo 0N1 0 / neated by Jacobson /� I IM o Ol - < ^SB - M Ln T 12-3 U T LOT Og ironmental S� ` 0 iM I IW M M �9\ \ S,� > y / 2°$ o II t cYJ 5 9 / I oe "e,ted WET 010 11 �' WLI ,2-1i �o v 1 I h II �\ \ 3 9��I \ O g I ,Ed9eotbo��E�tr��o�OZpS IN, 9726g X d S♦ ET 10-1('' ry M ( ,� g�2 taco X X X SB 1 WEINET 1 / Edge a Wetland as vt� A I Io 2 �\ \ �� .�% I ��� vXo by x E x JV y I I $,� / �Gw Delineated to Jacobson WET 12- 2 9 74 "r - ^j Environmental \ 9 \ A I 1Y o > II � I l \ / � ET 10_14 WE� 10- -� -� L--� ���' 2 ! -� I\ Lz-----� ---/ ("v 120.00 / �\\� �J 302.41 1 85.01 50.01 50.01 ' �� �20.44 \ 110.83 63.81 - _ _ _ _ - - S89040'02"W 1320.77 �� i � -913 //1 e go � / I ,-Ed9e of Water--- 6 a29 TNH=SITE BENCHMARK 926.69 x 290 x° QO X g0 g,2A, F / 0,2 0,2 X 9P of dP /-7 /- a 80 40 0 40 80 160 \Ix Edge of Water \ SCALE IN FEET ail �, I (CAOVRO sqote M OO M �D Civil Engineering - Surveying - Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 N Z }� E p a� 0 c V/ 0 O C J (D O 6 -0 \ / 0 i 0 _0) Z V O s l- U LLI d U I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINN TA. RORY L. SYaSTELIEN DATE 12-4-2020 LICENSE NO. 44565 QA/QC FIELD CREW . DRAWN BY CJ REVIEWED BY RS UPDATED BY VICINITY MAP SITE s' REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 1-26-21 Lot Configuration 2-4-21 Add Outlot F PROJECT NO.: 18301 PRELIMINARY PLAT V200 COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. The Meadows at Hugo HUGO, MINN SOTA ISSUED FOR: CITY R SU MITTAL ,51 1 LOCATION MtiN �Af DEVELOPER: Golden Valley Land Company 6001 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 CONTACT: Peter Knaeble peterknaeble@gmail.com 612-309-9215 ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT: CIVIL SITE GROUP 4931 W 35TH STREET SUITE 200 ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CONTACT: Matt Pavek 612-615-0060 SURVEYOR: CIVIL SITE GROUP 4931 W 35TH STREET SUITE 200 ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416 CONTACT: RORY SYNSTELIEN 612-615-0060 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER: Haugo Geotechnical Services CONTACT: Paul Haugo phaugo@haugogts.com 612-729-2959 WETLAND CONSULTANT: JACOBSON ENVIRONMENTAL, PLLC 5821 HUMBOLDT AVE NORTH BROOKLYN PARK, MN 55430 612-802-6619 -------------- ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. SITE LOCATION SHEET INDEX 0 O Know what's below. Call before you dig. SHEET NUMBER SHEET TITLE C0.0 TITLE SHEET V1.1 SITE SURVEY V1.2 SITE SURVEY V1.3 SITE SURVEY V1.4 SITE SURVEY V2.0 PRELIMINARY PLAT C1.0 REMOVALS PLAN W1.0 WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN W1.1 WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN W1.2 WETLAND MITIGATION PLAN W1.3 WETLAND ALTERNATE PLAN C2.0 OVERALL SITE PLAN C2.1 SITE PLAN C2.2 SITE PLAN C2.3 OFF SITE EASEMENT EXHIBIT C3.0 OVERALL GRADING PLAN C3.1 GRADING PLAN C3.2 GRADING PLAN C4.0 OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C4.1 UTILITY PLAN (SAN WATER) C4.2 UTILITY PLAN (SAN WATER) C4.3 UTILITY PLAN (STORM) C4.4 UTILITY PLAN(STORM) C5.0 CIVIL DETAILS C5.1 CIVIL DETAILS C5.2 CIVIL DETAILS C5.3 CIVIL DETAILS L1.0 OVERALL LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.1 LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.2 LANDSCAPE PLAN NOTES & DETAILS SW1.0 SWPPP - EXISTING CONDITIONS SW1.1 SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS SW1.2 SWPPP -DETAILS SW1.3 SWPPP - NARRATIVE SW1.4 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS SW1.5 SWPPP - ATTACHMENTS (C R017 0 Do R a �e c a o U Y, Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 :0E U w 0 fy a_ 0 >% Q a� � a' 0 r 0 O � o 0 c.0 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE No. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION TITLE SHEET Como COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP I Parcel ID: 0803121320002 I Owner: MUNGER FAMILY LIVING TRS Address: 5311 165TH ST N HUGO, MN 55038 S89029'46"W 1319.69 - �T-27 35 II Vn L N /' I A / 4 2� \i v v cn LNZ fuLn } U II O fu U) M L 0 o a o z c II =uOE Eov L � u aLU I Parcel ID: 0703121440005 o v Owner: CITY OF HUGO I U v I WEu) v M N N W u I 35 II 00 oLn 00 In ° Nz r u Imra FL N U I I L °- °' a) lip v IwE r,v rw 27 - / I�- II � II II CD II N I: II iN r- -l- l l r- �- i \- Ln O oC) I. U) II li I. II II — Parcel ID: 0703121440004 a I� I. II II Owner: CITY OF HUGO a co N I. II I� II Parcel ID: 0703121440001 II II Owner: CITY OF HUGO Address: 5290 159TH ST N HUGO, MN 55038 27 - r - o r A l i / N /4 l i o 4-355 / / v \/ �_ / Z° II \ u a I -0vN - 25 aEo N N,fu IIy uLU M I I. N89040'02"E 1320.77 I \ o ao I °'5 Z Z Z UZ o� � ^M F— NZ N ~U1 CnZ Nm = O> 00 < N �Q= �C6 NO 0) NQ F=- N0' = '4 Nr� N0_ �� NO N (w N Q� 00 N, O Z U O M Q f+7 00 M r0 M� o O OOJ00 O� ND N�ZOO D Q�� �pwLIJ0L0 r, JLdnLn � DLO � ��`� o=� (n Q�winZ JJ�O �7 •N� Q Z �� of W:2 �QUJ iris pJ N� ca_-00 u �0 0) N _O L O O 3 v= L CD_ LO �U W0 `� 00 v0 0-O0fSQ= 0 -;t L C:2v0 o;-fl7 L��7 0-0M< Ii0co< 0 O� �OQZ ----T N 159TH S (A Public R/W) qCf TNH=SITE BENCHMARK \J 926.69 (Width Varies) I Parcel ID: 0803121320001 Owner: MUNGER FAMILY LIVING TRS -/- I A / r \ i // / v v I A / // \i v v l / -t Parcel ID: 1703121220010 Owner: CITY OF HUGO DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY SURVEYED The Southwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota. Abstract Property. ALTA/NSPS Land Title Survey Notes (numbered per Table A) 1. Bearings are based on the Washington County Coordinate System (1986 Adjustment). 2. Site Address: Unassigned. 3. This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27163C0136E, effective date of February 3, 2010. 4. The Gross land area is 1,745,448 +/- square feet or 40.07 +/- acres. 5. Elevations are based on the NGVD 29 Datum. Site Benchmark is the top nut hydrant located on the north side of 159th St N, having an elevation of 926.69 feet. As shown hereon. NOTE: To convert from NGVD 29 Datum to NAVD 88 Datum, add 0.15 of a foot. 6. The current Zoning for the subject property is was not provided. Please note that the general restrictions for the subject property may have been amended through a city process. We could be unaware of such amendments if they are not in a recorded document provided to us. We recommend that a zoning letter be obtained from the Zoning Administrator for the current restrictions for this site. 9. We did not observe any striped parking stalls on subject property. 11. We have shown the location of utilities to the best of our ability based on observed evidence together with evidence from the following sources: plans obtained from utility companies, plans provided by client, markings by utility companies and other appropriate sources. We have used this information to develop a view of the underground utilities for this site. However, lacking excavation, the exact location of underground features cannot be accurately, completely and reliably depicted. Where additional or more detailed information is required, the client is advised that excavation may be necessary. Also, please note that seasonal conditions may inhibit our ability to visibly observe all the utilities located on the subject property. 13. The names of the adjoining owners of the platted lands, as shown hereon, are based on information obtained from Washington County GIS. 18. The wetland delineation was performed by Jacobson Environmental, PLLC, the report is dated September 13, 2018. SURVEY REPORT Ln z 1. This map and report was prepared with the benefit of a Commitment for Title Insurance issued by Land Title Inc, as agent for First American Title M Insurance Company, File No. 626322, dated October 30, 2020. We note the following with regards to Schedule B of the herein referenced Title N w Commitment: M 0 a. Item no.'s 1-10 and 17 are not survey related. 0 Z Q b. The following are numbered per the referenced title Commitment: W J N to Ln Q Nog 11. Easement for electric in favor of Northern States Power Company, dated June 11, 1956, filed June 19, 1956, as Document No. 185981, 0o 0 Book 200 Deeds Page 556, Assignment and Assumption of Easements dated February 7, 2001, filed March 8, 2001 as Document Number M 3145752. As shown hereon over the west 27 feet of subject property. o 05 N z o w 12. Easement in favor of Metropolitan Sewer Board dated February 25, 1971, filed March 1, 1971, as Document No. 287225, Book 311 Deeds, o Page 160. As shown hereon over the west 35 feet of subject property. 0 o= 13. Consent to Allow Encroachment onto Sanitary Sewer Easements dated July 16, 2001, filed July 25, 2001, as Document No. 3170523. As m shown hereon over the west 35 feet of subject property. 0-0 14. Easement for Public Utility and Municipal Water purposes dated July 17, 2001, filed August 3, 2001, as Document No. 3172032. As shown hereon over part of the southwest corner of subject property. 16. Regulations and restrictions imposed on designated wetlands shown on available maps. Wet/ands are shown hereon throughout subject property. See sheets 2, 3 and 5. 17. Branch No. 3 of Judicial Ditch 3, aka County to County Ditch 3, as shown by available section maps. See sheets 2 and 3. ALTA CERTIFICATION To: Centra Homes, LLC; Thommes & Thomas Land Clearing, a partnership under the laws of the State of Minnesota; Golden Valley Land Company; First American Title Insurance Company; and Land Title, Inc.: This is to certify that this map or plat and the survey on which it is based were made in accordance with the 2016 Minimum Standard Detail Requirements for ALTA/NSPS Land Title Surveys, jointly established and adopted by ALTA and NSPS, and includes Items 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 9, 11, and 13 of Table A thereof. The field work was completed on 11-23-2020. Dated this 24th day of NQYeiycber, 2020. Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565 rory@civilsitegroup.com AN�� 80 40 0 40 80 160 SCALE IN FEET LinetYp e & Symbol Legend Y 9 GAS GASMAIN QU UTILITY MANHOLE SIGN WATERMAIN OO SANITARY MANHOLE ® BOLLARD > SANITARY SEWER sT STORM MANHOLE Q ELECTRIC MANHOLE >> STORM SEWER ® CATCH BASIN 4 FLARED END SECTION oHu OVERHEAD UTILITIES ® ROOF DRAIN GAS VALVE ELE ELECTRIC LINE ❑T TELEPHONE BOX HYDRANT x CHAINLINK FENCELINE 9ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER WATER MANHOLE WOODEN FENCELINE OE ELECTRICAL METER g WATER VALVE GRAVEL/LANDSCAPE SURFACE • FOUND IRON MONUMENT -0-POWER POLE a a O SET IRON MONUMENT ° a CONCRETE SURFACE (D CAST IRON MONUMENT GUY WIRE BITUMINOUS SURFACE -- T (CROURO SAOTe a IQ ( M r Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 CV 04 L0 Z E O V � r J o Qi Q O O � O O O CD0 V O 1— U LLI W_ J d U I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINN TA. RORY L. SYNSTELIEN DATE 11-24-20 LICENSE No. 44565 QA/QC FIELD CREW JWN DRAWN BY JRN REVIEWED BY CJ UPDATED BY . VICINITY MAP 16 - SI TE REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 12-15-20 Title Commitment 1-5-21 Add NAVD88 Conversion Note PROJECT NO.: 18301 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY vim COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. WET 12_130 WET 12_131 WET E I 16s xg\ xgID L6 x / Xy / x I y - Xg h / / Xg / / 228 I 914 I IIIIIIII I I I n / xe� 6 xg \ / xg1 \ I g0 9� J2 \ \ I ^� \ / �6 k g\� '�'� g�k• I k \ 1596 916 g2 (� g15k � —914— --i} X g1k5 / XgN2 X 6• / I g \ g16$ kk / g16ld1 Ji„/ X g� �^ X kg6 X \ \ X �g,��0= �_ O,L III I \ / X g� 'I O 1 IC j X xe5 / X I �.= \ / X g 5� �e I �II xg5�o xC' 6 ( 1 III / \ X \ x x x \ x x/ x x x �--�x--�� x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x�-x 9 5� X g\6h g �a X g1� �0 g16g2 511 'I �� x 910 X kk / X 11 X / x �II g166k Xg16. X X �X I xg16 1kq'i FZ�' - I I X WET 12_126 -- WET 12_12 \ \ ,./ \ —� / q / / Xg \Xl \g1 - 5 TI �i / � � \ \ \ \ / /_�\ / g1�h2 Xg1��2 / � I / WET 12_124 �/ x / / '� ^(� I / /xgN WET 12_127 / zi / 915.72 T 9N6• g1y;1 . g'S 56 \ \ X / k g W/ E B / X X \ \ X xg1� X X01�N / gNkg2 I / /� X 16� f�16 Xg ,,/ \ x 1X 915 915 pk / / xglk xg1"�2 / X I 4 �J X / / / / J XIN"Ib// X1 Ig1h e - I 01 \re0ap/ x g1 g16 - et\a J\Cp og X `Edge GO'o"o, x \ �/, \ 1� 9166g x k9 8 6 m O 9\ I Q \ \6a 2\ •C X k � X i 6v //� �/ / � 1 I I \ x \ x x g 916 g2 a ] gN6? g16 , / X X p'tij X g1 / g1k kb ���o X o o / X I/ N n 6�2 .g16' \ ^ '�a Nkh$ / i / / g150 / 1kc�0 g� // x g1 N a I / g '�� / / j// X 9 1 x C 166k x g 4 �� Ii x \ // / / //r x g16 WET E I / �� I i N / \ 16-5 22 690 / _ _ - - / gN5' \ / / g16 WE B .3 u) u \WET xXgN, Xg1g X ✓ x '' r, O \ \ 915�--------- h�k 09 �// /� /i// /\ \ 'M !\\�50 / 119 01 // � // x �x gN \/g /� /\ 7 \ 6� 91�g0 B5 5o2121/ // / /^ g12_ 7�— —914— _x—c e1k'6 U- v\ 1k1Ed a of Wetland as D I' ----' // \ 25a x C o \ — — � x9 e heated / 1= vp a, a / \ by Jacobson Environmental 165 x-C N to X0� gN60 \ \ g 10 \ `/ \ \ X 91�69 x g / /� \ \� I I U a W X x g 50g I / \ g16' X o g * I U C 30 / i / / \ g6 \ \ gN6 gN66 \ \ \ / // • // w v cn ' \ ET 12_120 fig' \ bag X X k6 I X N � / u W u / / \ \ \ \ \ 50� Xgg1 g16g0 1".Lg I g1k2k 101� g10�5 I F \ a \ — — �� X ` \ \ I I I X �� x xg/ xg x xg x x \91 d F \ kg6 g1 I I ,�////// All" I Co 41j gN \ 16X I -' //p, // Z\ �5 I � k X "op\ 1 so/J ��d12O T 12119 .So \ x \ q2 ( / �- 6'N g169 / 91y. cC�` ds \ \ X g k g16 \ \ g1k0 / /� \ \ x x /~O Q \ \ g1611 g1Og� x X// �2 � 0i X X A f x I \ , /� "? WET 12_118 WET 12 117 6 II I \ \ Cn Xg1k. \ WET 12_115 xgNkB I I \ Xg1". Xg1,S5 �// \ / —s15— --Edge oWater Edf Ws gN6' I 1 _ I 91i I \ X x / I N6'6 g\ ( II / / ' ----- - — — x •� \ / T 12 114 � y C Ln x 66 ,' / / I �J \ `\ Xg1� I g15g I I i I__= ---Edge of Wetland a�elineated / 00 O6 \ \ / / \ Xg 06 / I I/ 'I 9X g1•L9 I __ _ __ __ __ cO '� \ X \ Xg16. \ g1kg8 /, , 915. / \ g15g0 I\�� s by Jacobson Env i nmental xg1�'/ 15 / xgN6' E O / X \ / / / / / N62k \ \ X \ g6 X YN2 c'j I I I I I ( I I \ \ °j 202 N2' 0 / / x I I z \ / ' ET�12_113 / Xg\/2IXu\ / X 913 6 1\ X N g W T 12_112 Xg165 \ 5 \ gN6 II li I / U a g169 X \ M I I I I II i / / X g1k62 / i I k$ �c WHET 1 2-111 X \ \ X 9N'122 \ \ \ I I I I I I I65h gN�go x gN�O / x gNk�/ x gN66 x 4\1) w ,kWT 12_110 \ \ \ k?S \ II I X9 / E I N5. _ _ N \ X g I \III II u lL "� ` \ - _ X gN5 \ \ / / X g �5 I X \ 5� \ �` \ \ \ XgN� 6� , T I I \ \ N�. II II WET E �� �� 1k� g c I I I k\ / gN6• 1\ � g1 I 914.74— —9-- � "1< " _ _ � - I k�'I O � I � g16 X \ �X / / N V I I li I I I \/1J� Ng\� 11 X916g / / gNk2� / WE'f 12_106 1.46 X� ^ IIII II 1 `914� / / / \\\ \ 1 k5 I I I r \ / \ Xg16 i u I I All II W T 12_105 \\ x � 1 � �\ k9 I � I II � \ 6 / WET 12_103 \\ / i xgN�' I i I I I I I II \N'1?) l " 'S8 "Nk -' gNk6 / gN6�k gN66k 2- / / 91k? Xg x/ WET 1 _104 \ ��/ ---- \ / 1� - III Xg gN6' I xgNk' X X X X JXg l I / / X - \ \ X \ gNkye I I I X \ / li I �\ I \ 16� gN I II r WET B \\ I g X I / WET 12_91ditch / r \ \ \ I X III II xgNS / g1�95 1k5a �' I k \\\ gNk�6 \ ` —Edge of Wetland as Delineated- 1 \ \ \ I I I \ \ I \ \ Xg I gNk9 �6 by Jacobson Environmental \ I I \ \ / I \ X � � gN6' X '/ / ' X gNy�k X 9N6N2 \ 9N600 A � N5 X 9N022 \ � / / \ WET 12_93 I \ X Xg- / \ \ \ I II I I ` N gN0O6 1 X 912y� gN,y=9 gNk;55 � gNkgO / \ k. III g x x x 66 WET 12_10 \ \ p2 1 N6 / I I XgN6 Xg \ I \ \ \ \ g1= �\ Xg Xg \ \ \ I III II \ X WET 2_10, I g15�\ \ \\ —� \ - _ / \ ► II �I I II II \ X x x ET 12_ 00 \ X \\\ \ \k 6 --� g \ 6o k5k I I I \ g Xg1/ / WET 12_94 g1k'� WET 12 99 \� \ g1k� X1k65 ��� 1 9Ne X60v" XggNkll xg tx \g �I x I / / 12_90 \ Nk6g x k2 \ 11II lkkk \\ \ -X N62$ s \ \ 2 ' x g k�h 62k gN6 I X g \/ \ x g I \ 1? \ I III I I 41 / 1 1 1 / \ 9 II 1 x I I/ / N5;16 g� g16�2 \ WET 12_95 Xg \ Xg X I \ �� g 6 x \ 5 6 N5 V x g1 x \ g0 x �� gN5 X \ gNk WET 12_96 WET 12_98 � � X X /2 5k2 ` \ 'C� I I I gN641 k$g I g1,S5'I 91�2k 91 02 gN�-yN gN�g`L �p 2 WET E \ ,{IJ/ N \ \ \ \ I I I I 1 Yl - N6 'yI` I 12_97 r\'J I X g \ 9,j I I I I I I I I I X x g x x x \ X x g k5 WET 12_86 \\\ \ . o gNh g662 \ o \ I I I \ /12817 g \ \ X \ \\ \\ g1k'� X XX�1 916� T 12_ 87 \ / N66� 6 1 g1"$� \\ x x \ X N662 k 91k N60g X g g1E" X \ \ `� g � k \ \ 6 k, , II WET 12_88 \ xg \ xg15 X \ \ y2 Nk' g1 \ �\ I � ) \ gNk� Xg X \ N X I I I JVgN6° WET 12_85 \ � X xgNk� \ —Edge of Wetland WET 12_84 X`` g1k \ \ / II I II I I \N?� gN�62 g16 12°� 12?1 \ �2 \ \ \ x \ \ \ I I I I g X g g g as Delineated o I \ 562I \ �\ — g5 / X / x / x X x \ by Jacobson \/ Xg155 \, xg1 \ g \\\ \ X \ gN 6 II I II II I I II I / I Environmental \ \ g1650 \ ` 2"S I gNk� X I I 61 I 63 X gN6 6N X 6. N6' 5 x N6 g\ �q I I II I II g1 �915— 9 \� g16 g X X WET 12_83 X g1 � \ \ X \ >` I �6 62 16 X I 1�. Nk. Sr / \ Match See Sheet 2 l \ g ')NO" ----- g----------- g1 -- - -�-I----------------------------------------------------------------- --- ----------------------�--heet 3- -+-----------------------------------------\-- ----/�----- ------------------ --- - -- - -------------- --------L---------------------�- I � � - I \ � \ \ Line (See Sheet 3) 1 \ \r\ \\�\\ � xglk � —.o,� �� � Linetype & Symbol Legend GAS GASMAIN OU UTILITY MANHOLE WATERMAIN OO SANITARY MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER sT STORM MANHOLE >> STORM SEWER ® CATCH BASIN oHu OVERHEAD UTILITIES ® ROOF DRAIN ELE ELECTRIC LINE ❑T TELEPHONE BOX x CHAINLINK FENCELINE eT ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER 11 WOODEN FENCELINE QE ELECTRICAL METER GRAVEL/LANDSCAPE FOUND IRON MONUMENT SURFACE O SET IRON MONUMENT a a ° a CONCRETE SURFACE Gp CAST IRON MONUMENT BITUMINOUS SURFACE SIGN ® BOLLARD Q ELECTRIC MANHOLE Q FLARED END SECTION GAS VALVE HYDRANT WATER MANHOLE g WATER VALVE —a POWER POLE I GUY WIRE 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET C�OVHO sRote LJ lS O U 7 Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 O CV 04 i Lr) 00 M CD z L O V z (a Y 0 0 U J 0 o —_ > Q O O O U LLj d U I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINN TA. RORY L. SYNSTELIEN DATE 11-24-20 LICENSE NO. 44565 QA/QC FIELD CREW JWN DRAWN BY JRN REVIEWED BY CJ UPDATED BY 1. VICINITY MAP 2 b' 61 SI TE REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 12-15-20 Title Commitment 1-5-21 Add NAVD88 Conversion Note PROJECT NO.: 18301 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY viol COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. /40 X / :e y c O N 'fa M W N �N a� M D O u 0 a o2: 0 L �a i� e x g1gg 1 I ------r]-r- (--Edge of Wetland WET 12_84 a, g R, a / 11 I Rye y62 ,6 LR� 22 x I I g \ \ \ \ X X \\\ \5 \ / I II / xg / xg X9/ xg xg x -- by Jas acobson d \\// Xghy° I \ \ Xg�62 \ \ 5g \\\\ \ X91� \ xg56 - IIII I II I 111 I / I \\\ Environmental I g1b50 xg R g\\ S5N X \ 8° x g1 16a1 c, \ �,q g� �915� g \� g�5 g x \� \�i \ \ I I / X I I X WET 12_83 I X � I \ �� \ 1R. \ �5>` / II � � \ \ Match See Sheet 2 l \ g g ----- g----------- g ___ _ __ _ -- --A-1----------------------- �- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - \--------------- --- ----------------------�- �-+-----------------------------------------\- -- ----- ---------- I ------------------- --- -------------------------- - \ - gR �C------- �1 I{ �- -- - \ Line (See Sheet 3) I ° \ X \ \ 15' \ �� g R. I � � / X g\ roe / WET 12_8258 / \ X \ I Xg Rg2 11 I g g12g12 g WET 12_80 g5 50 \ \2'I \\\ g` I I X X� Xg '�g X Xg / WET 12_81 X X9�, Xg'�\ �R \\\ I x II IIII l I I / g R. \\ I J� x X o I I / Ed e of Wetland ro °o / g x / I 9 Xg,�. Xg1696 \ Xg1�°� \�X jPg X \\\A� 7�g1RXg�R20 IIII I I I I ^� / / // as Delineated by Jacobson x N>1° B / 5� X I I \ / Environmental \ g \ 6 / T 12_5�3 WET 12_79dit\h 6 \ \ X 1 g R5 \ \ \\ I Xg RR gs / I IIII I Xxg / \ o ET 12_54 R / X -I \ Xg6. R \ X Xg \\ xg`R \�/ / Ij WE 8 oPEI �L57 �_x--- WET 8= xWET 8_67 gNO' x9`g°2�o Xg� 0 II -J— WET 8_56 2g i - X SB 8-2-WET x I g6° \ WET 12_55. Xg g5°� y2° \/ g R5g \\\ 1 I JNE8-58 l2 4\ 8 X WET 8_66 J- I- X g60� \ WET X Xg / X \9\\\ r- —. / / WE �_60 _off — `X x -Xi— �12 \ - \ WET 8_72� X J 2 \\ I so8.os 9 ° WET 8_63 o s \ \ / x— WE �—" WET 8_70 _" — \ \ W 8_6 'cx WET 8_65 WET 8_68 \ - I WET \ \ SB 14-WE X g6g0 $ / 0 R 0 6g g Rh5 o RSA \� / �55 Xg�' II r/ WET 8_64\ \ WET 8_71 WET 8. \ \ X g x WET B X I I I I Ir 5R \ SB 8-2-UP R x g x I ��>\ 6g� \ \ \ X / / x RR r —� g �' \ \ WET 8_76 0 � \ \ \ �B 14-UP Xg1R R WET E �= \ Xg�' I I III X �13\ \ X g \ \ \� \ °R �� I I \ \ \ s11.73 X \ 5 \\ \ 63$ g ✓ Xg62 g5�� �914, Xg1 WET 12_2\ ���\\WET 12_28 — I I (IIII g2 X WET 8_77\ X I \ Xg�pET 12_78�ch Xg X \ X l / \ Xgg. _/ \ WET 12_2 / / III III / \ �� 1 Xg2 \ \ \ , ,5 g / g °1$ / WET 8_79 1x WET WET 12_56�ch g,R�' g��� Xg \ \ g�2. � I I I \ Xg �- xe X ° X / \ \ 252 X I I IIII I y'g / WET 8_80 x I I xg1 \ \ \ \ WET 12_77 \ I Xg �� 2\ \ Xg I I II I I I cp 1Xg WET 8_81T-- \ I I \ \ \ WEY12_24 \ \ wET 12_30 / �913r �II I I III �_ I ,�_' WET 12_75 e1 � ,6 e to I Q� d' X a x g ,65° g X gx� x \ 10.82 -Y 9\\ WET 12_31 I I I I IIII I T WET 8_83 WE/ 8_82 d ag Oe�e\ta\ / �2 �a2g WET 12_76 X g \ x e15a I ` —913— �` ,�2h R III IIII x _ — - s et\ar .\CorC� ge g I I I WET 12_741 2g 1\\\ \ g Wq/T 12_23 9/0.\ xs° I`I L I I of rN / X x , 1 9�5 \ / x T / Z'I / \ \ o9 g I I I e 0� E ,x I I I Ix WET 12_57 WET 12_73 \ \ X gR1 I I g12g6 \ / \� Xg1 -- WET 12_3� \ \ WET 32 I III I I IIII I X- ,� ,Edg�acobs I /= - g92R Xg�g \ X ��° X \ \ / >R' WET 12_37 \� I I J WET 8_84 X I I Xg I lay / WET 12_38 / WET 12_35\\y SB 12-2�JP \ �2 xcl \ \ n\\ \XN12_33 I IIII I I III I / I I //� WET 12_39 - I WET 1 g \ WET 12_72 g WET 12_34 COD X I I I$ �6� 51 X 12 / /� \ INV\ I lr g1�'92 $ 915.98 \ X g X g10 �2 \ 9� / / / 0� 909.54\ .I J Xga. I SB 12-2-WET \ Xg6 \ og / Xg2 /WET 12_40 g� \� �1N7 5 x X I L� - / / II xWET 12_58 \ e , / / WET 8 9 / \ g,$$ �\ I \ x�1 xg1Rag WE 12_21 �12/ X / \ Ny\I I ',II �// / /j sx� I X / I g/WE 12_41 \17 II' \ //// / / R� I 6 I x / I //�� / \R. Xgaa I 2 I �1 WET 12_71 I / xWET 8_8 R23 Xo 6� x I II W I I / X x WET 12_59 I I / / / / WET 1/42 g26 / /� 9g 2 I g° ° ( - j / I Xg 1 I g Rg0 � g\" Xg \ / / / X I 1 < WET 8-4 / WET 8_ Xg,�' x I / I X� co WET 12_20 / / \ \ 1\ 9tat4� \ — — � I \ I ^ / Xg xg6e 2 Xg2 /Zoe R 2� \ I I I / WE 8_5 WET 8_6 1 I \ a �RJ�ET 12_60 96 / jig I X9 i s12s2 -914� g` 1,' �° �^ x Rp2 WET 12_ y/� \ I I I eg I X �'� X` g / 9�� • i \ 6 S� / \ ���-_ I � � X g, �2�g T" \ o� \x Xg j �916\ \W€ 12_61 WET 12_7f� I / X9I2go I \ \ \ I I IIII \� Xg1� \ x a �5 \ \ pro I I I \ �a Lo \ Pi 12_62 / / / / \ / 127 I a / I e1 I I �D 1 - g15 �$ 1 / / SB 12-1-WET / I X \ I \ III I I\ ET 12_63 X / xg6 /%WJ_1,2_�4 / g8 0� �� �� . �E —917— WET 12_19 $ xe g2 I e \ I I x / X X \ aka aa��e Xg1 . WE 12_� WET 12_69 \ \ Xg �g / / SB 12-1-9P2�� �g0 x I� I' \ / VQ. �\ ;`to \ \ 1 / /x g\ / \ET 12_45 /III II \ ° \ 36� o� �tCt` \ Ug,2JP 9 / I III I g 5 ) X g X g1� x gx� x g1�. x g 3. 1WET 12_�5 WET 12_68 WET 12_18 / g,\g6a� l III II \ � X R1, III I I / , / WET 12_46 1 X iXg g182a WET 12_67 9 i Xg j /III / \ x g1�g0° / �g'LE' g X i 1 x 915.91 g� g\6�9 / / / / / '1 / / X 9,� X °'`� R8 / / g / g \ g /WET 12_66 X / 2� X / x / x \ g\a' I / \ / �0 / g1 / / R� II I / x yg X / Xg, /I 1�66\ ""�- �919� / I I / WET 12_5 WET 12_6 \ / / ( WET 12_17 X / —g14� / NIII IIII I Xg'jP g */WET 12_47 / l / \ / / �\ /2 ° / / g / x c �N'0 I%I /I II I / Ix g�2 x 9�2 x 9�2 \X g�25 SB 1 3 \E�T X 9�2' / / I 12_4 6R\WE\T 12_7 I WET 12_16 Xg� j o6/' I l l $ SB 13- I ' I J/WET �R //�C/ NJET 12_48 55 � . � I � / / I /g2 I �9' g. 55 9 X X g X g1�/ / / el, Ix �X,1 °�� I ,� I lV / _ I / / x 1 WET 12_15 / o/'' \ Xg1R1 W X (X,/ 2WET1 _ 3g Xg X9 g,�� --If I / i / 0� R66 X I / / \ X g` g\2' g�2' g\2• g\2' �� 5 1-I / / g,�. / g, / i 1 X X x x WET 12_49 X x X / , f x g16� R / i X \ / X �,� -- Edge of Wetland as - - - - - - Delineated by Jacobson- 1� I \ I WET 12_14 Environmental I 1 WET 1 _3WET 7� I 12_9 )eated / 9hyR \ / XgR 68 9655 gR° g�y5 g2 I 'i g�as Oe\\ ta\ 0 X / Xg X X X III I et\ard • oov�\ J"`e� / WET 12 50 I I I / Of Er 2 6 �5 4lI I I I e r 91 ,2 9, 0�0 I / ge' ep$ Al R�/\ ID T 12_11 /\WET 12_13 \ II I \ �2 Edg DpSo y xe 25a: / x Xg1 / e1� /---Edge of Wetland as--- --� _ \ I I I �� \ / y5� I ,2 lac / , / / Delineated by Jacobson T 12_12 / I I \ / I 1�1 ( I I \ X \ X J1— _ / / I / \ I � � Environmental \WE � I I \ \ l p1i/ /X ET 12_ �I\ \ WVET E I �� I \�\ -- Wlre Fence r � ET B � I — ! � x x x -- — = — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — Tjs/ / �� \ \ \\ \ / \ \ \ \ / / —� —913� / I ,II 907.7 / INV= ( Rim�919.12 / / 15� / //// �/� — u / \ ✓��� / / (� 907.6�� — / Garage cFE- / �\ Edge of Water Xg 918.92 //// / /� �� / / I / / x g I �► / / / X \ ///,�// / / �� / / xg\`L u O \ \Q78 g -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- W1NH-SITE BENCHMARK lJ 926.69 159TH ST N (A Public R/W) (Width Varies) Linetype & Symbol Legend GAS GASMAIN WATERMAIN > SANITARY SEWER >> STORM SEWER OHu OVERHEAD UTILITIES ELE ELECTRIC LINE CHAINLINK FENCELINE x WOODEN FENCELINE 11 GRAVEL/LANDSCAPE SURFACE a a CONCRETE SURFACE BITUMINOUS SURFACE UTILITY MANHOLE QS SANITARY MANHOLE ST STORM MANHOLE O ® CATCH BASIN 4 ® ROOF DRAIN ❑T TELEPHONE BOX ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER ELECTRICAL METER g • FOUND IRON MONUMENT O SET IRON MONUMENT _0_0 CAST IRON MONUMENT 1 i x X x c0- 1 ° X �2 xg12 R5 6 xg,.L I �\ X xg Match (See Sheet 3)-- \� \\------------------- / J/ -/ / ---- ----------------------------------------------------- -- Line (See Sheet 4)------------------------------------------\ - \ - - - �----------I --- � \ 2 ^ ry g I� # -- I-- -Edge of Water SIGN BOLLARD ELECTRIC MANHOLE FLARED END SECTION GAS VALVE HYDRANT WATER MANHOLE WATER VALVE POWER POLE GUY WIRE (C�OVHO sRote LJ lS O U 7 Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 O CV 04 L0 }+ co M O Z L O V Z (� > 0 U J 0 0 > 0 v CD U LLI d U I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINN TA. RORY L. SYNSTELIEN DATE 11-24-20 LICENSE NO. 44565 QA/QC FIELD CREW JWN DRAWN BY JRN REVIEWED BY CJ UPDATED BY 1 VICINITY MAP 1 /NV REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 12-15-20 Title Commitment 1-5-21 Add NAVD88 Conversion Note PROJECT NO.: 18301 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET V1 ■ 2 COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUPCOPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC� a WET 1 _3 WET 12_9 - ted \ / N Q25 i I I X WET 12_10 X9h�k / / Xg1kk�/ / X96�� X96551 Xg k6 X9�6� 92g0 j lI III 11�7>\ I 9h 9 / I et�ard a�Ome tad O I / Of r 0 6 r WET 12 50 I I E z a �h 4i � � I / I I � e r` � ,Z st N 0000 I / 98 ap$ Al \ \WET 12_11 \ \ II / \ �2 ,Ed9 co'o X9 Xe 2.saX / X / _----Ed e of Wetland as----=--VWET ,\WET 12_13 I _ \ / I I \ ( h° I ,z �a X I I r-9 x41", \ 9,9 X/ — — Delineated by Jacobson 12_12 c/ \ \ ,I / \ I / Environmental 111\ ET 12_ \ \ WET E -- wlre Fence -- x x x x x x x SMH z N890'02"E 1320.77\ \ \ /_/ / — / _ _ / / 907. Iw_ \ RNr919.12 x 15� / 907. — \ o Garage x \ / /� GFE= / I ,--Edge of Water - X' �, 918.92 \ / `\ \ J / g I x \ / / / / / I X 91g+6 1�, b-77 I X X 9`2 kh X 10- 01, X I / (C�OVHO sRote Q (�:D U 7 Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 -- --- ------------------------------------------------------------- Match (See Sheet 3)--------------------------------------- \\ \� /----- \ ------------------------------------------ Line (See Sheet 4) \\ - ----------------------- / -�- / � �/ �---------� -----� �-� --------------------------------------------------- -- ter �-- -Edge of Water O �(A Public R/W) 926.69 TNH=SIlE BENCHMARK (Width Varies) \ \ / � / \ / fIII co� � a /// I \ }+ 1 X -0 > III III \ \\ o o (D IIII IIIIII X0 II _ o a _ > p IIII IIII / X 9� � X9,h5° (D x� ��I I o II II IIIIIIIIIII� 2 \ S `o Jill IJill XF \ I I 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET Linetype & Symbol Legend GAS GASMAIN (Q) UTILITY MANHOLE WATERMAIN SIGN QS SANITARY MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER ® BOLLARD >> STORM SEWER sT STORM MANHOLE O ELECTRIC MANHOLE oHU OVERHEAD UTILITIES ® CATCH BASIN Q FLARED END SECTION ELE ELECTRIC LINE ® ROOF DRAIN ( GAS VALVE x CHAINLINK FENCELINE11 ❑T TELEPHONE BOX WOODEN FENCELINE HYDRANT Er ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER GRAVEL/LANDSCAPE Q WATER MANHOLE SURFACE OE ELECTRICAL METER g WATER VALVE a a • FOUND IRON MONUMENT °a CONCRETE SURFACE O SET IRON MONUMENT POWER POLE BITUMINOUS SURFACE (D CAST IRON MONUMENT GUY WIRE �g � Xg, \ IIII III 9�2 \\ \ X 9,041 X 916;50 I I I / i \ \\ \ 9•`h khl \ X ) i 1//l/l 111111'I l/,�,lrIIIIIII ///III I I— U � w d U I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINN TA. RORY L. SYNSTELIEN DATE 11-24-20 LICENSE NO. 44565 QA/QC FIELD CREW JWN DRAWN BY JRN REVIEWED BY CJ UPDATED BY VICINITY MAP z m 61 SI TE REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 12-15-20 Title Commitment 1-5-21 Add NAVD88 Conversion Note PROJECT NO.: 18301 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY V1 031 COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. / I I o XWET_85—Edge of WetlandET 12_84Oas Delineated 5o I \ \ 562 \ \ (C �07 �Rote En Jacobson X9X /X9` / I I Environmental I g55a zs / Xg0?� 15— WET 12_83 Xgx6ys 4\ X \\ \ \ Xa��° \ \ X96 / I I X M_at_c Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture , \ Line � � \ Line 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 � \ St. Louis Park, MN 55416 oa / WET 12_82 / / ( X I i g1� / WET 12_80 Xg1y�a / \ Xg1S\°1 \ civilsitegroup.com 612 615 0060 WET 12_81 ° Xg61� Xg1hy X9x� Xgyo° \ X9�°� x I V1�xB \ i 12_5_ 3� ET 12_54 WET 12_79dit�h o6k \ 1\ o \ I I \ \ \ Xg 6�k� / x 9e9° \ \r�WET 12_5 � X91 \ X g5 520 \ �16` \ 96a3 WET X / X9 X g 6g0 I _ X /J \ \ \\ SB 1 \-WE / X gyn2 / Xg g59 '� I �i\ �g,6a5 \\\ \ X � I �� \ �B 14-UP X / / X g $ X g f g 2 I X g11 \ \ �� \ \ I ° n y Xg2 \ \ \ 96d6 / 9$da X9 \ \ Xe�' )_\917� \ X�166 J Xgo WET 12_78tch X9 X X � X9 9 \ �918r I I \ ° / 1918\ \ WET 12_56 tch \ \ 9 605 \ \/J k —919— / X 2p, „got9 \ \ Xg / 9g°$ Xg� /T�� X I I Xg \ \ \ i WET 12_77 \ C/ X 9 `�� \ I / 10$O / OT \ I 2 k \ \ CV 2 $2 �/ / ` Xg2 I I \ WET 12_7\ X(01 g\6p \ \ �\ 92° \ y6 ✓ / i 1g�k X g�650 \ Ogg 5s \ \�\ / g22� �2 $ J / / X9 X I I Xgxas2 Xg112g I I I x WET 12_57 WET 12_76 WEET122\ 1 X Xg . 9 y. X/g I X , 1 ° / �\ / 2u2� \ \ 1 �1 \2k I 9 6�g C>) n/ Xg2 9 X 2\ \ '�� X I X 9�9.. X 9 X ��1\ / / / \ g227�s \ \ \ X I \ : I I I 1 \\ SB 12-2�UP X ," 205° I I g1$10 / I I I I WET 12_72 'O 6s� x \ � / / / / \ _/ "9\ \ °'1 \ ✓ X X9 I Xlq� 91\ X91 Xg�65 �2 X 92 g I II J X 9° x WET 12_58 SB 12-2-WET \ X 9 6 O X g 6 / / / /X g2 922 p9 X g2°�k Xg2° g2°�1 X I X g188a X Xg2. I Xg2z / Edge of Woods ---� I IXg ' h2 I �1� WET 12_71 I � / I N x WET 12_59 .� 6�"/ /y0 \ I b20 N : I I g ng° 9�5�° X g'16'S \ ^� LID i� X g / X g °' 00 �X °fie /\ x I I / � X g1� 22 g 6" oo z / 2 n) 1 1 61 / / / 2 I k9 X 9 I / 92 8 \ k C� X 92 �N5 I I ` _WET 12_60 I / \ X o M / 2x. X I X I ET / g2 1 �9 \ 1CD E / / I b I X9 � WET /\k I I I X9 \ Xg / X91�� xx/� Xgo�6 ''—g16� � WET 12_61 WET 1 7 }+ Lrj >, WE� / \WET / I , 5 qo� x E 2- I t j N /WET \\ I I I \ �,aGo� \ °WET 12_62 / Z v (0 X g ,5a / 92� / x� \/ ' wa �a �16 15� / /m I 1 Xg2 e� \9�9\yc WE / --Wire Fence I 5 xo J�a o� a\ x 9`� $ JET 12_63 gX9119 r 5 tSs. o \ x ,oa8 I g2`1 / N / 9, , _ X �— I �,9• / g a' o� ea �< ,, —917— , \ I 1� 4 �+ X / X x� \� \\ I X 0 a o WE 12_ WET 12_69 X X 2226 1 / f\ 0 J 0 g \ / 1 / / �1a \ \ X91 \ / /Xg / s5 \ \ XET Xg2°�° I I �x / 0, —cJl&_ \WET 12_ 5� WET 12_68 v / O N Xg21j JWET� \ \ 2 X I gags _ \ / \ 2� 1 / +0 � Q \ X gx� \ 2°6y\ / / �( t\\\\ X 91 WET / \\ I X X WET 12_67 9� 9 �5• / \ \ h9 \ X x WET\/ �e`5 / I/ Xgxg g80 / '1g26 jX 915.91 �`\ ,6yg — O \ Xg$ 2 2 Xg2 / \ Xg �918I Xg / Xg 9189g /WET 12_66 \ Xg / \ \ \ Xg2 I ` / —923_ I 9`9� / WET \ / �91g— / X ' 1 WET 12_5 WET 12_6 \ / / /9 WET 4) ° \ WET Xg�$�� I/ Xg�a66 \/ /-- 2eg'5 \ I 22— WET / }� g g\ k \ c� g2 g2 / X 920 WET B WET O O X \ / \ \ \ I I X9223 / `\ J I I� W�2_7 I WE O \ \ V �/ \ / E WET-/ WET / I ' JWET 12_4 g k6N Cfl I �� �' �, n I X g21 n I X g20'L� X g1g 6`7- / g ag0 / g 0� 2 X ' g, h?a , I /R \ I \ �°\1$�s I I / \ Upper Bowl---- I /X X X91k \�Xg I (XWET 12_ \ X92 Water Tower \ 2 �i I I / Xg9�$ \ \ \ \ Xg2°�� p�_ / (per Aerial \ \ X992 aEi - 5 \ I / /,/ * WET 1 _ 3�4 \ i91 Photos) m N I � � \E7 \ w p I °ka ,°1� ///"' � � Xg2 X9 1 �gx Xg�° E H = M g X g�6 ' U FFE= g2" U I �J / / W I I I / X - z ✓ WET 12-14 Q W Y 921.90 I / / WET 1 3 I * WET 12_9 I � 025 � I�k E Water Tower N a o I I X / g15� U �, N L 1 WET 12_10 X _ I 1j �v I — I GFE- O i 921.88 N a o / �5 1� I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, Xg6' I I / X98' Xga�$ " x \WET 12_11 WET 12_13 PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME / — I Xg --Edge of Wetland as----�_ __ X9x9. I I X/ _ Delineated by Jacobson WET 12_12 c/ OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND ' 924.56 I I I _ _ _ / ' / THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND / I Environmental `1 /RRn-919.16 / g2°s I ` I I I g2 05 / vel Drive / j I — % / / 1�/ / NET 12_ \ \ SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE \ I I STATE OF MINN TA. INS.: INV= INV= 914.76 I 7916.31 D !g!/LOW RIM \ 917.51 1 i 6 v v x1 V INV= 915.75 INV. 1 1 I 1 1 915.82 I I N 50 25 0 25 50 100 SCALE IN FEET Linetype & Symbol Legend GAS GASMAIN QU UTILITY MANHOLE g22' 9 / / L 9`Z SMH S °22 Rim--921.95 V / \9 /Rim-919.0122 \ \ Inv�91B.g X g226\ 9�8 } \ g2\ / \ \ X x x x x x x SMH / \ R'Mn-919.12 RORY L. SYNSTELIEN \ o Garage / �/ � DATE 11-24-20 LICENSE No. 44565 cFE- --Edge of Water QA/QC I I I I / I / r WATERMAIN � SIGN SANITARY MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER BOLLARD >> STORM SEWER sT STORM MANHOLE (D ELECTRIC MANHOLE OHu OVERHEAD UTILITIES ® CATCH BASIN a FLARED END SECTION ELE ELECTRIC LINE ® ROOF DRAIN x CHAINLINK FENCELINE GAS VALVE [11 TELEPHONE BOX WOODEN FENCELINE HYDRANT ET ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER GRAVEL/LANDSCAPE � Qw WATER MANHOLE SURFACE ELECTRICAL METER g WATER VALVE a a • FOUND IRON MONUMENT °a CONCRETE SURFACE O SET IRON MONUMENT -a POWER POLE BITUMINOUS SURFACE O CAST IRON MONUMENT I GUY WIRE I _I too TM -SITE BENCHMARK �J 926.69 g1 / Xg166, 159TH ST N (A Public R/W) (Width Varies) FIELD CREW JWN DRAWN BY JRN REVIEWED BY UPDATED BY fin\ VICINITY MAP /NV -- -- M` Li r 61 SI TE REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 12-15-20 Title Commitment 1-5-21 Add NAVD88 Conversion Note PROJECT NO.: 18301 ALTA/NSPS LAND TITLE SURVEY V1 4 ■ COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. REMOVAL NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. SEE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) PLAN FOR CONSTRUCTION STORM WATER MANAGEMENT PLAN. 3. REMOVAL OF MATERIALS NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT, STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 4. REMOVAL OF PRIVATE UTILITIES SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH UTILITY OWNER PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 5. EXISTING PAVEMENTS SHALL BE SAWCUT IN LOCATIONS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS OR THE NEAREST JOINT FOR PROPOSED PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS. 6. REMOVED MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF TO A LEGAL OFF -SITE LOCATION AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH STATE AND LOCAL REGULATIONS. 7. ABANDON, REMOVAL, CONNECTION, AND PROTECTION NOTES SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS ARE APPROXIMATE. COORDINATE WITH PROPOSED PLANS. 8. EXISTING ON -SITE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL SHALL BE PROTECTED THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. 9. PROPERTY LINES SHALL BE CONSIDERED GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. WORK WITHIN THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL INCLUDE STAGING, DEMOLITION AND CLEAN-UP OPERATIONS AS WELL AS CONSTRUCTION SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS. 10. MINOR WORK OUTSIDE OF THE GENERAL CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHALL BE ALLOWED AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN AND PER CITY REQUIREMENTS. 11. DAMAGE BEYOND THE PROPERTY LIMITS CAUSED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY SHALL BE REPAIRED IN A MANNER APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OR IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 12. PROPOSED WORK (BUILDING AND CIVIL) SHALL NOT DISTURB EXISTING UTILITIES UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 13. SITE SECURITY MAY BE NECESSARY AND PROVIDED IN A MANNER TO PROHIBIT VANDALISM, AND THEFT, DURING AND AFTER NORMAL WORK HOURS, THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. SECURITY MATERIALS SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CITY. 14. VEHICULAR ACCESS TO THE SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED FOR DELIVERY AND INSPECTION ACCESS DURING NORMAL OPERATING HOURS. AT NO POINT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT SHALL CIRCULATION OF ADJACENT STREETS BE BLOCKED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 15. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED AND ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL REMAIN OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 16. SHORING FOR BUILDING EXCAVATION MAY BE USED AT THE DISCRETION OF THE CONTRACTOR AND AS APPROVED BY THE OWNERS REPRESENTATIVE AND THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 17. STAGING, DEMOLITION, AND CLEAN-UP AREAS SHALL BE WITHIN THE PROPERTY LIMITS AS SHOWN ON THE DRAWINGS AND MAINTAINED IN A MANNER AS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 18. ALL EXISTING SITE TRAFFIC/REGULATORY SIGNAGE TO BE INVENTORIED AND IF REMOVED FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TO LGU. 19. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. EROSION CONTROL NOTES: SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 CITY OFHUGO REMOVAL NOTES: 1. ANY EXISTING PORTIONS OF FINALE AVENUE THAT ARE TO BE ABANDONED OR REMOVED SHALL HAVE ALL PAVEMENT AND BASE MATERIALS REMOVED AND REPLACED WITH TOPSOIL. COORDINATE WITH CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE EXISTING UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG EXISTING PORTIONS OF FINALE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WHO MAY BE INVOLVED. RELOCATION, REMOVAL OR PROTECTION OF EXISTING UTILITIES MUST BE AGREED UPON AND COORDINATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. REMOVALS LEGEND: EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL REMOVE EXISTING TREES -INCLUDING ROOTS AND STUMPS EXTEND FEI BEYOND DF WHERE PO TREE DRIPLINE, OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS Parcel ID: 0703121440005 Owner: CITY OF HUGO LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION, TYP. TREE PROTECTION SIGN. TYP. POSTS AND FENCING DL DRIPLINE WIDTH FURNISH A AND INSTALL TEMPORARY FENCE AT THE TREE'S DRIP LINE OR CONSTRUCTION LIMITS AS SHOWN ON PLAN, PRIOR TO ANY CONSTRUCTION. WHERE POSSIBLE PLACE FENCE 25' BEYOND DRIP LINE. PLACE TREE PROTECTION SIGN ON POSTS, ONE PER INDIVIDUAL TREE (FACING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY), OR ONE EVERY 100' LF ALONG A GROVE OR MULTI -TREE PROTECTION AREA. TREE PROTECTION NTS -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - I Parcel ID: 0703121440004 Owner: CITY OF HUGO LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION, TYP:°°d= ---- SEE WETLAND PLAN, W1.0 FOR WETLAND PROTECTION, REMOVALS AND REPLACEMENT. .......... -----wire I REMOVE EXISTING TREES, TYP. I 'J 1100/0 I I l \ LIMITS OF ET CONSTRUCTION TYPE F z 921, a r ui �ci i �: 0312 440001 E Water Tower a c Owner: CI 10 H 0 cFF- Addres 5290 15 H ST N H 1 T_ HUGO N 55038 245 91 NV= 914 1. \4 916.31 0 X II INV= 9, 5. MH 915.02 ) lUJ I�+N� 0� Rim=9 95 I \ / �/ CBR Rim=919.12 In v=916.02 REMOVE EXITING CURB AND GUTTER AS NECESSARY FOR NEW CON S`TRUCTI0'N.� 14 r IN IF I o Parcel ID: 0803121320002 Owner: MUNGER FAMILY LIVING TRS Address: 5311 165TH ST N HUGO, MN 55038 II J I 5 JREMOVE FENCE, r� REMOVE FENCE, - TYP. J TYP. i z i 000 .00 ♦ „ v 100, J J M REMOVE FENCE, \ / o z TYP. \ I � .v 1 I I Eov / 1 I I o�w r %> I �l II \ I II \ II � I \ II I Parcel ID: 0803121320001 Owner: MUNGER FAMILY LIVING TRS S89029'46" 1319.69 _11o'I_ z F REMOVE FENCE, i?REMOVE FENCE,REMOVE FENCE, TYP. / i TYP. TYP. � u REMOVE ALL EXISTING DRAINTILE FOUND DURING CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS II i I I N 1 \\ I " I I I wEftft LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION, TYP. E 12_91ditc II ET 12_100 WET 12_99 O 1 I .4 L WET 12198 �► SEE WETLAND PLAN, T 12_97 I 1 W1.0 FOR WETLAND \ PROTECTION,Ln o I REMOVALS ANDLn \ \ o i REPLACEMENT. \ o I \ x WET E REIGVE FENCE, TYP. i N Q 0V 0 >- (h Nw/= _ N 00 4: J O 0 1.0 JLu11) Loz J Z U NO ND I L Cg_0C) 0 3 -o n nr154T LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION, TYP. REMOVE FENCE, A TYP. WETLAND PLAN, W1.0 FOR FLAND PROTECTION, REMOVALS REPLACEMENT. REMOVE ALL EXISTING DRAINTILE FOUND DURING I CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS WET 12_69 T 1 _65 WET 12_68 WET 12_67 000 WET 12_66 '0i L _ / /Z O 00 NONO _91YSO � O000�c 0 0�oZ0 O o 00 !ZOO ��Q�� I 6V0 Lrr) rin1o� p=U �Z O`nZ F U)m 07 'N`L \ O J •N� aLiQ L_0 �O L �p I o 3�--00� 0 C-0 01 tcU 0_0a5QS 00 n_ O I 05 z r� H o> _N Q F=- N O I I; O 00 OW 00 ^C,WMV I LO �� ��Lv..Z o- Q � C� �O 0 3 Q -0 ZD a_0:2< LIMITS OF ; CONSTRUCTION, TYP. �WET 11 _'WET B WIT 1 --- T J , "ET 1 ,, SEE WETLAND PLAN, W1.0 FOR WETLAND PROTECTION, REMOVALS AND REPLACEMENT. N89040'02"E i -Ede of III I SEE WETLAND PLAN, W1.0 FOR I I WETLAND PROTECTION, REMOVALS ;-- �-t I it AND REPLACEMENT. ; i \ 1 II •--------------------- I I 1 1 � 11 III L - \ REMOVE ALL EXISTING ' DRAINTILE FOUND DURING CONSTRUCTION i li ' 'OPERATIONS ; 11 I REMOVE CULVERT WET WET B I--35'1-- �.1 I WET 1 _2 WET 12_28 I \ I IWET 12 24 WET 1 -23 WE-12_22 WET 12_39- I WET 1 WET 12_40�- INV= WET 12_41 I 909.1 WET 12_42 I I l 1 = WET 1 4 t 910.14 WET 12_43 1 ! "S1 12-1 199 44 I I I B T2-1-UP 1 1 / / I A 4 SEE WETLAND PLAN, W1.0 FOR / WETLAND PROTECTION, REMOVALS V V AND REPLACEMENT. / LIMITS OF ; I/ / CONSTRUCTION, TYP. 1 REMOVE FENCE, TYP. -x-� -x 1320.77 �a 9P �F `LdA`N / 907.64 Parcel ID: 170312124 10 Owner: CITY OF HUQ0 0 Id 0 0 Know what's below. Cal I before you dig. C000 AIR (�E m o U DD Civil Engineering - Surveying . Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION REMOVALS PLAN C1 0 ■ COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. (C Rov HOR a qoJ I =. I I J WETLAND WETLAND X / WETLAND X 2224 SF FILL I 7 1 LOW FLOOR=918.00 \ _ LOW FLOOR=918.50 (per lot cert, verify) a verify) \ (per lot cert, verify) 159TH ST-I-T- I I / / 1 r)XA1 FI r)oR=919 no / WETLAND LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE m m m m m CONSTRUCTION LIMITS a m ( M p II Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 1 j WETLAND CALCULATIONS: r — — DITCH 7 -- =Edge of Water -------- — — — — WEI 58, WETLf 20 CITY OF HUGO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES. WETLAND TO REMAIN (RESTORATION OF PARTIALLY DRAINED SUBP. 4) WETLAND RESTORATION AREA (VEGETATIVE RESTORATION OF FARMED WETLANDS SUBP. 5) WETLAND BUFFER AREA (SUBP. 6) WETLAND CREATION AREA (SUBP. 7) WETLAND FILL AREA TOTAL EXISTING WETLAND AREA = 258075 SF (5.92 AC) WETLAND FILL AREA FILL AREA A11=318 FILL AREA A2=13167 FILL AREA B=13889 FILL AREA C=13104 FILL AREA D2=20011 FILL AREA D3=2077 FILL AREA D4=1331 FILL AREA G1=10645 FILL AREA G2=705 FILL AREA X=2224 TOTAL FILL AREA=77471 (1.78AC) WETLAND MITIGATION CREDIT ACTIONS NEW CREATED WETLANDS (SUBP. 7) CREATION AREA 1=17984 CREATION AREA 2=7659 CREATION AREA 3=5860 CREATION AREA 4=31576 CREATION AREA 5=21652 TOTAL ON -SITE CREATION AREA=84731 (1.95 AC) PER SUBP. 7 - 75% CREDIT = 63548 SF (1.46 AC) WETLAND RESTORATION AREA (VEGETATIVE RESTORATION OF FARMED WETLANDS SUBP. 5) RESTORE AREA 1=949 RESTORE AREA 2=7959 RESTORE AREA 3=3089 RESTORE AREA 4=4653 RESTORE AREA 5=3897 TOTAL WETLAND RESTORATION AREA = 20547 (0.47 AC) PER SUBP. 5 - 50% CREDIT = 10274 SF (0.24 AC) WETLAND RESTORATION AREA (RESTORATION OF PARTIALLY DRAINED WETLANDS SUBP. 4) WETLAND A=63656 WETLAND D1=10900 WETLAND D2=4231 WETLAND D4=2806 WETLAND E=67678 WETLAND F=16078 WETLAND G=16910 TOTAL WETLAND RESTORATION AREA = 182259 (4.18AC) PER SUBP. 4 - 50% CREDIT = 91130 SF (2.09 AC) WETLAND UPLAND BUFFER AREAS (SUBP. 2) WETLAND BUFFER PER CREATION AND RESTORED WETLANDS (25' MINIMUM AVERAGE BUFFER WIDTH) CREATION AREA 1 AND RESTORATION AREA 1-3 (CONTIGUOUS) TOTAL WETLAND EDGE LENGTH=895' TOTAL REQUIRED BUFFER AREA IF 25' AVERAGE=895' X 25' = 22,375 SF TOTAL PROVIDED BUFFER AREA=29,160 SF CREATION AREA 2 TOTAL PROVIDED WETLAND BUFFER = 4,515 SF CREATION AREA 3 TOTAL PROVIDED WETLAND BUFFER = 3,106 SF CREATION AREA 4 TOTAL PROVIDED WETLAND BUFFER = 20,898 SF CREATION AREA 5 TOTAL PROVIDED WETLAND BUFFER = 24,343 SF RESTORATION AREA 4 TOTAL WETLAND EDGE LENGTH=193' TOTAL REQUIRED BUFFER AREA IF 25' AVERAGE=193' X 25' = 4825 SF TOTAL PROVIDED BUFFER AREA=5737 SF RESTORATION AREA 5 TOTAL WETLAND EDGE LENGTH=196' TOTAL REQUIRED BUFFER AREA IF 25' AVERAGE=196' X 25' =4900 SF TOTAL PROVIDED BUFFER AREA=6,557 SF TOTAL BUFFER AREA=94316 (2.17AC) PER SUBP. 2 - 25% CREDIT = 23579 SF (0.54 AC) TOTAL FILL = 1.78 ACRES REQUIRED MITIGATION 2:1=3.54 AC ON -SITE MITIGATION CREDIT=188,531 SF = 4.33 ACRES OFF SITE CREDITS - NOT USED z00 a Know what's below. Call before you dig. O N N � L0 u7 E O _N Z N o J _0 O C� O O 2 � N � O O 0 1� � O O s CO U W O ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION WETLAND PLAN W1 0 ■ COPYRIGHT 2020CIVIL SITE GROUP IN j VM1TS OF OON17RUCTION I I \ I \\ I X g211. e of Woods ----- -Wire Fence 91� — d C 11 °\a)X E I N M \ I� Z a5 1 i 025 X N Q Xg2 //vvvv` vv\ �`1\ 1-11� X°2°�� X°2°°° X \� g22� \\\ �`L I p9 \\ g2°8k X92° XX92 IIX xg2° I \V X°2 k° I\ x°22�$ i�I // �\ Edge of Woods------� ° I \ ( 2° I I N / a6 \ I °a X g_11 i 9� �° % i I X i k II I$ i X "N'09, � 2° 6 /\ 42° X Xg2k9 Xg21/ / V// /// � 998T/ �9gjOc�n 2 X9 < X9�1 I /IX �`(\99�9 \ ET / y/'\�T / \ I I I g'\ a / X°2 �r 9. -Wire Fence I I I 5 X / ,/ / / / . d �°2 •NET /�� ° � / I Xg' °<v 0/ X *RAND X x / 8 ' \\ X9\9 k2 \ X g22° I''� I I °2�50 \,ic \\\\,hc N", X9,9\ ° O \ \\ Xg2�/ I // xg2 /� `wEr \ \\ WETLAND \\ °65 \ / LIMIT50V' / 1 / \ \ \ X9` / ' W-T I Xg2 \� // CONSTRUCTIgp�" / 1 I/ �WET\� $ 5 \ 2224 SF ♦ = +:6-9 h 9 am 9---------J r / g 6,�g \ \ , I "''=� — — — X , �922.00HP' — _ — — - \ � 9 r 9 .87 NN �� 2°0 �/ \ Xg2 \ X91\11 E / WE LAN CO TION r°5 IN \\ p99 \ FFE= 6" 6 10� `2�� X 921.90 25 - <� V E Water Tower a� 9 ti e2°a� cj C) NIT 5� X X I ti v \ 1° I I I ` 92 ,g2 gz /— .9 I a2 I I 5 L �g26a 1,° 24.58 ° g20 19.16 Rtm=g/LOW RIM �\ b'Ib SMH �,� °g° A, ��y9„— �1 e`6) i R 87 % g2F9 , V A _ 9 nr-916.02 X," \ \ \' \X9\NT 99 • -- ml I I I �I I I I I I I i9 I in 5 II / R�OO(7, (C OR7HO I , II' I I III I Civil Engineering - Surveying - Landscape Architecture l 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 I ill — — �St. Louis Park, MN 55416 ICI I I I Illi IIL�_ civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 I k9 1.50 I II IhI I I IIII II__— 9 I II I III-- � I I Jj7 I III _ -6 ti Top BERM II< °III , I I II III II �!- II I IIII II I IIIIII / II � III III II 11.50.02 III IBTOP BERM Q' O� 9 j$01 IIIIIIII 4q— I Ill l lr 2�C/ I III I, `C C Q O O v � r — 01Cj 1 . IIII llv I O 33' II l II o IjII I��\ � 11 1 IIII \ / 1 �II� II 1 \ N I �dh I 1 JI IIII 1 ET Ci `O hl� I i� �� E 1 IIII , CD � III IIII /, / ♦ 1 — > / ,< �IIII/III �X LD O 1 NII III � � O 0 MITS Cl) d 9I II�ONSTRCTION I CD r;II II I ) IIII;I l Q 0 IIII1. I \ \ BVjM \\ \\ 11 O 07.7 "°� — OT (.0 C) W XI) 0 1 �a O�0 Know what's below. Call before you dig. A(!N 1 " = 50'-0" 25-0" 0 50'-0" I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION WETLAND PLAN SOUTH ■ COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP • •I • • �•. • • •• _ .. • �I�I�I�I�.�'�I�I�I�I i,-AmCog �f'�'1®��'ili> ` I I I� I I i `� , .. =. �. - ♦ . � MINIMUM ✓0I I�.y7 ',►► ;�►►; iLOR N�'ii�i►� ���������i�i�i�i�.y�i:�i�i�i�i�i�.�i�.�►..♦.♦.♦.♦.�I I � ' IMF', 1, 10 ON , RIVIN OWN W NMI gpv MINE FA 11150101 IF 1121 ►ly16 NIX 4' IR♦. �i ♦ _�► ,I�I�I�I �I� / ,♦I♦ •, ... ����� ..��. �r�� .����i� +✓fir' �� �,••�,,I;y *10 go NOW 40 .y r► ♦ �� �� �1 ,as► t�, L.P♦i<�:./ I I�I_�Ij'�I�I � ����� �,•� Io��I�.y♦i��� �. a♦ � I. � I c ,I I „. • >�I�I�j�j�i� '��,.,�! _ �,�yl ;� •,,��• �,�,�iy�,�� ®��►�.♦ ��+.���i����,+����`ij►�� 'v; � �•� i�� ! �► a �I��a ' �Il ��►! ,ice>�,����.r.;��I�✓''� ����i �♦I�►:•I�� �`��a►y►� ��i; ���+ �������������r�w����,������� ���/� I�;� .,, la► ''�Ii► �1�'I �� I ♦ICI , �� I���It NIe,/♦�ii►���� , MOM MIVA ,I I� ICI /,%i l ,d%I ✓� ♦ 1 < I�.�►�I- 1- � �� ���♦ . :. � '.; � I� � �� �� � 1 • ✓ N NOR,ICI ✓� -�✓'� �����%�'' � �I' i1•�l I► ►� �'i �i�►y�� ��►✓�✓�.!�►;ice, � -!%! �� �'�i��y'�� � ►/ I � I, I►� 1► ► OIWINK� . • . / ���, - �,�����j• • ':� 11 ��''►, �I �'✓�'I�'�11 NE ,� S+ • • .� �A�� `. `� �..� �Ijlli WIN • 0>N on 1514 _ ►�!► A�� •' r►mil , r . ✓ I I' r - .I I w ��i►�'�IN .. �`<�►<�►w!'����i`ia��� _ � ®��®' I�.�, ��0��������i>S — ... �11►•� � ill �rv�yVi, mill • ►►✓�✓ 0 fl 0 0 Know what's below. Call before you dig. COR7 R 0H SO� a m( M p Civil Engineering • Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 N N L0 E O a� V� � a Z 2 J _0 O c � Cl) _ Q) E: >0 O O O� V v O o c� s F_ U w O o_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION WETLAND PLAN NORTH W1 2 ■ COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. (CRO7H0 �i sqoJ I =. I J WETLAND X A, A, / WETLAND X 2224 SF A` FILL I LOW FLOOR=918.00 \ _ LOW FLOOR=918.50 (per lot cert, verify) a rify) ve \ (per lot cert, verify) 159TH ST-N- IV07 `tV VG L I I / / 1 r11A1 FI r)oP=919 nn / WETLAND LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE m m m m m CONSTRUCTION LIMITS a m O M p II Civil Engineering - Surveying - Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 1 j WETLAND CALCULATIONS: —_ --Edge of Water DITCH 7 WE1 58, WETL/ 20 CITY OF HUGO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES. "mmm, III TOTAL EXISTING WETLAND AREA = 258075 SF (5.92 AC) WETLAND FILL AREA FILL AREA A11=318 FILL AREA A2=13167 FILL AREA A3=8093 FILL AREA A4=20969 FILL AREA B=13889 FILL AREA C=13104 FILL AREA D2=20011 FILL AREA D3=2077 FILL AREA D4=1331 FILL AREA F=13462 FILL AREA G=14080 FILL AREA E1=15228 FILL AREA E2=13564 FILL AREA G1=10645 FILL AREA G2=705 FILL AREA X=2224 TOTAL FILL AREA=162867 (3.74AC) WETLAND MITIGATION CREDIT ACTIONS TOTAL FILL = 3.74 ACRES REQUIRED MITIGATION 2:1=7.48 AC ON -SITE MITIGATION CREDIT=O OFF SITE CREDITS - 7.48 ACRES PURCHASED PER WETLAND BANK z00 a Know what's below. Call before you dig. O N N L0 u7 E _N ♦0 V � Z N _0 o J O CD 0 (D —_ > O O 0 1� � O O s CO U W O ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION WETLAND PLAN ALT #1 W1 3 ■ COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP IN SITE DATA: OVERALL SITE AREA CALCULATIONS - ON SITE EXISTING PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE 0 SF 0.0% 210,460 SF 14.7% ALL PAVEMENTS 0 SF 0.0% 233,435 SF 16.3% ALL NON -PAVEMENTS 1,434,632 SF 100.0% 990,737 SF 69.1% TOTAL SITE AREA 1,434,632 SF 100.0% 11434,632 SF 100.0% OVERALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE- ON SITE EXISTING CONDITION 0 SF 0.0% PROPOSED CONDITION 443,895 SF 30.9% DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 443,895 SF 30.9% OVERALL SITE AREA CALCULATIONS - OFF SITE EXISTING PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE 0 SF 0.0% 0 SF 0.0% ALL PAVEMENTS 0 SF 0.0% 25,758 SF 55.5% ALL NON -PAVEMENTS 46,333 SF 100.0% 20,575 SF 44.4% TOTALSITEAREA 46,333 SF 100.0% 46,333 SF 100.0% OVERALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE- OFF SITE EXISTING CONDITION 0 SF 0.0% PROPOSED CONDITION 25,758 SF 55.6% DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 25,758 SF 55.6% LOT NO. LOT AREA (SF) BLDG HC (SF) LOT PVMT HC (SF) SF PATIO HC (SF) TOTAL LOT HC % LOT HC BLOCK 1 1 11,896 2800 454 150 3404 28.61% 2 7,002 2800 454 150 3404 48.61% 3 7,002 2800 454 150 3404 48.61% 4 1 7,051 2800 455 150 3405 48.29% BLOCK 2 1 7,175 2800 463 150 3413 47.57% 2 6,600 2800 450 150 3400 51.52% 3 7,532 2800 490 150 3440 45.67% 4 7,369 2800 468 150 3418 46.38% 5 7,328 2800 461 150 3411 46.55% 6 10,063 2800 620 150 3570 35.48% BLOCK 3 1 7,361 2400 540 150 3090 41.98% 2 9,541 2800 556 150 3506 36.75% 3 12,251 2800 559 150 3509 28.64% 4 10,061 2800 659 150 3609 35.87% 5 7,058 28001 544 150 3494 49.50% 6 8,506 28001 814 150 3764 44.25% 7 8,218 2800 461 150 3411 41.51% 8 7,002 2800 465 150 3415 48.77% 9 7,762 2800 542 150 3492 44.99% 10 9,638 2800 548 150 3498 36.29% 11 7,020 2800 611 150 3561 50.73% 12 7,020 2800 611 150 3561 50.73% 13 7,020 2800 611 150 3561 50.73% 14 7,020 2800 611 150 3561 50.73% 15 7,020 2800 521 150 3471 49.44% 16 7,029 2800 526 150 3476 49.45% 17 7,910 28001 611 150 3561 45.02% 18 7,938 28001 611 150 3561 44.86% 19 7,217 2800 611 150 3561 49.34% 20 8,694 2800 580 150 3530 40.60% 21 8,159 2800 881 150 3831 46.95% 22 8,119 2800 771 150 3721 45.83% 23 7,606 2800 659 150 3609 47.45% 24 7,232 28001 604 150 3554 49.14% 25 7,042 2800 556 1501 3506 49.79% BLOCK 4 1 1 9,500 2400 776 150 3326 35.01% 2 8,264 2800 450 150 3400 41.14% 3 10,174 2800 465 150 3415 33.57% 4 12,723 2800 450 150 3400 26.72% BLOCKS 1 15,335 2800 452 150 3402 22.18% 2 17,637 2030 450 150 2630 14.91% 3 21,249 2030 457 150 2637 12.41% 4 12,378 2030 457 150 2637 21.30% 5 7,482 2030 455 150 2635 35.22% 6 6,494 2030 468 150 2648 40.78% 7 6,540 2030 450 150 2630 40.21% 8 6,545 2030 453 150 2633 40.23% 9 6,758 2030 540 150 2720 40.25% 10 7,293 2030 623 150 2803 38.43% BLOCK 6 1 10,062 2800 459 150 3409 33.88% 2 10,675 28001 460 150 3410 31.94% 3 10,123 2800 459 150 3409 33.68% 4 8,384 2800 619 150 3569 42.57% 5 11,211 2800 696 150 3646 32.52% 6 6,375 2030 541 150 2721 42.68% 7 9,667 2030 450 150 2630 27.21% BLOCK 7 1 5,500 2030 450 150 2630 47.82% 2 5,500 2030 450 150 2630 47.82% 3 7,907 2030 450 150 2630 33.26% BLOCK 8 1 1 8,884 2030 450 150 2630 29.60% 2 6,160 2030 450 150 2630 42.69% 3 6,160 2030 450 150 2630 42.69% 4 6,160 20301 450 150 2630 42.69% 5 6,160 2030 450 150 2630 42.69% 6 6,172 2030 450 150 2630 42.61% 7 6,180 2030 457 150 2637 42.67% BLOCK 9 1 6,871 2030 726 150 2906 42.29% 2 6,681 2030 483 150 2663 39.86% 3 6,197 2030 450 150 2630 42.44% 4 6,166 2030 540 150 2720 44.11% 5 6,177 2030 630 150 2810 45.49% 6 6,185 2030 540 150 2720 43.98% 7 6,196 2030 450 150 2630 42.45% 8 10,197 2030 461 150 2641 25.901/0 9 10,119 2030 621 150 2801 27.68% 10 6,160 2030 542 150 2722 44.19% 11 6,160 2030 450 150 2630 42.69% 12 6,160 2030 540 150 2720 44.16% 13 6,160 2030 630 150 2810 45.62% 14 6,160 2030 540 150 2720 44.16% 15 8,809 2030 450 150 2630 29.86% 16 9,043 2030 460 150 2640 29.19% 17 6,140 2030 540 150 2720 44.30% 18 6,173 2030 635 150 2815 45.60% 19 6,346 2030 600 150 2780 43.81% 20 6,433 2030 579 150 2759 42.89% 21 6,356 2030 619 150 2799 44.04% OTL. A 83,216 0 0 0 0 0.00% OTL. B 224,692 0 0 0 0 0.00% OTL. C 113,813 0 01 0 0 0.00% OTL. D 42,299 0 2034 0 2034 4.81% OTL. E 29,702 0 0 0 0 0.00% ROW 237,907 0 171,896 0 1718961 72.25% OVERALL TOTAL 1434632 �210460� 220385 13050 443895 30.94% Gross Site Area (to center of ditch): 32.93 Ac. (Off site right of way area): (1.06 Ac) Existing Wetland Area: 5.92 Ac. Net Developable Area: 27.01 Ac. (Lots & Local Roads, Ponds) Existing Wetland Area: 5.92 Ac. Farmed/ Cropped /Ditched Wetland Removed: 1.77 Ac. Non-Farmed/Ditched Wetland Removed: 0.00 Ac. Wetland Saved: 4.15Ac. (70%) Zoning: Existing Zoning: FUS ( Future Urban Service) 2040 Land Use Guide: MDR (Medium Density Residential) (3-6 u/a) Proposed Zoning/ Land Use: PUD (MDR) DNR Shoreland Management Ordinance: 9.53 ac 300' from ditch No touch Shoreland Impact Zone 53' adj. to ditch (70% of 75) Min. Lot width DNR PUD: 50' Structure setback from ditch: 50' f/ OHW Min. Lot size: none Max. hardcover 25% (entire 300) Building FFE: Y above OHW Min. Openspace DNR PUD: 50% (4.77 ac.) Proposed Public Openspace DNR PUD: 58% (5.13 ac) Private Lots (50'x135)1 ROW.- 4.40 ac. Overall Residential Units: 87 lots (3.22 u/a) Villa 1-story SF lots 50' x 135%140' min.: 45 lots Villa 2-story SF lots 44' x 135%140' min.: 42 lots Setbacks: 50' lots 25' front (variable, 25' minimum) 30' rear 5' side/ 15' side row 44' lots 25' front (variable, 25' minimum) 30' rear 7.5' sidel 15' side row SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE M M M M M CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CURB AND GUTTER -SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUT GUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE -SEE PLAN SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE). SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED. HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGN NP = NO PARKING FIRE LANE ST = STOP CP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY CITY OF HUGO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES. PARK CALCULATIONS: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES. PUBLIC STREET TCURB LINE I- ROW LINE I I LOT NUMBER PAD SIZE 29'X70' LOT LINE o I i i PAD I I' MINIMUM SF LOT SIZE: 5, I I D & U EASEMENT 10' FRONT & REAR 5' SIDE (TYP.) BUILDING SETBACK I 26 FRONT L-----J 30'REAR 44.00' - - 7.5' SIDES/ 15SIDE ROW TYPICAL 2-STORY VILLA HOME SINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION: PUBLIC STREET r- CURB LINE ROW LINE I I LOT NUMBER PAD SIZE 40'X70' LOT LINE O I I I PAD I 4-MINIMUM LOT SIZE: � I I 6,750 SF D & U EASEMENT 10' FRONT & REAR 5' SIDE (TYP.) BUILDING SETBACK 25'FRONT L------- 30'REAR 50.00' - - S SIDES/ 15SIDE ROW TYPICAL 1-STORY VILLA HOME SINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �I WETLAND X % - �+ / I E I I 91 NV= 9141r q 916.31 V / �Inv=905�'7' �� CBR Rim=919.12 IIInv=916.02 +\ INV= � MH / 915. V- VT2im=9B1.9 '- 915.82 lJ / o RimH 921.95 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E F BLOCK 4 11 I I 41 2 I I 00 y` ♦ � � ` ll� GO � � � 4 i 0WETLAND 0,900 S D1 ♦ G� 5 � , - 1 , SF� I 1 \ g�0 2 ♦� 1 �3 8�3 4 5 ' `BLOCK 6 I I I l BASIN 1 ANWL=914.59 I OUTLET EL=914.50 ti F ♦ 100-YR HWL=915.64 I I I` WETLAND A 1 \ 63,656 SF I I coA, I I - - �l I - - I v �- ............. _ v 01 I ♦ I I \ �0 ,♦ / ��� /Q C�35bFl I $ 100, O m I r 1 - I BASIN 2 \ \ �O NWL=914.5004 I /OUTLET EL=914.," ♦ \ I I (100-YR HWL=915.54 11 1y I 1 I I 0,/ WETLAND F / / - ♦ 3 \ I - - / qb - - .0 r I '1 I I II II - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EOF 0��v0l / 1 I' ' to Bg FI / / 1 WETLAND H 1555 SF / I 1 (DITCHED) -71 lb N 00 V, I / / DITCH 7 I I I I I i I I a II ►► I 001V01 I I III l II I ll II - II II I I II � I II II I I i I I I I BASIN 5 I I I I cb I I NWL=911.50 I I OUTLET EL=911.50 i I I 100-YR HWL=913.46 I i I I III I i i� II II II I � II II I I N I I I I I I I WEl I I j I 58, i II I o 11 1� �► ; I I I _ _ I 1 BASIN 3 10I 1 L' BASIN 11 F . OUTLET F,L=915.011 Z� \ I 1 -YR HWL=916.4� 1 II WETLAND I I I cm 40 grab I IF �OG� I \I Tluazu ( \ WETLAND E W ( 67,678 SF 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 d \ %) BASIN 4 �1 I 2 NWL=913.00 017TLET EL=9f3.00 II Rim=91b:3 gv0 T OUTLET EOF=914.50 Ov P 100-YR HWL=914.93 SFl EOF - - - - - \ 914.50 I II LOW FLOOR=920.00 I LOW FLOOR=919.70 WETLAND D2, ♦ I \3774SF IN - I h , INV- 1 I' O 1 INV V I Aso, 0000e WETLAND 8 910.14 58,590 SF I I I o \ I I 1 1 / illll 1 I II 1 1 \ ,(3 3 \ O ' 1 WETLY 1 20.' I 1 907.64 0 0 0 Know what's below. Call before you dig. 0 0 0 (�E a o U LF�) Civil Engineering - Surveying . Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 i� I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KEVIN TEPIP11EN DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 26980 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY 1 DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION OVERALL SITE PLAN C200 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. / I I LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION I I I D&U ESMT. 1 (TYP.) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I DUTLOT I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I D&U i I ESMT. (TYP.) I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I --Wire Fence I I - I 1 I 1 I 1 I _ I _ I I I� 0 vo wo I T � I-� I z M :CESS o BY CITY i �25 lap° I � i I � v Iua I ' I ' � 1 ' \, WETLAND F, �. \ Q \ \ / I I 5' CONCRE • / / \\ QP \ \ \ \ \�i /0� I ��—-------- I o I H ♦ SIDEWALK (TYP.) • / \ -�6 \ \ > , I I cn p �► .. \ Zg+ o\ ARIABLE \ i5F l(0 l I x Q I I W I^ — — — �_ •—� / / \ \ Q P \ \ \BACK (2 M �U / \ \i 6 ���1�� j �\ \� \ / I I C; — r N — — I O <\\\ II — ---- — co C111I \\ �� \ F \ \ \ 9�� I �I �oQ I �m 2QP0 \ \� \ 6�� < / \ 1 \ \ZQPO I �I rNa --------- II \ \\ \ �3; l I o \ I � N ' I ♦ \\ \ / / j � \ \ \ Zo f�Q \ \\ \\\ \ \ \� � STREET LIGHT (TYP.)— — — — o I I I 5' CONCRETE♦ \ \\ /�^°�//\\ \ \\ \\� Qp,Q \ \\ �' 6b SIDEW ot(TYP. TRAIL (TYP.) 6 N � ---------� 3b' , I BASIN3 < I — LL -- ------ CO b ---II�NWL=915.00 OUTLET L=915.06�\ �\ \ br)F $►zI 0�\ \ \\ \ \ \\\ \ / CD------- WETLAND1Q — l I • QP \\ \ / I — — — — — - I i \� 16,910 SF \ \ \ \ \ > \ W �I `I'C IL I �3 I _ _ _ H Q I LIMITS OF �\ , \ ���° I 3p' — — — — I— C�1STRl-CTIOPl� ��� LL 1 � 0 J of I cvax� a I N `Z Q I — POND o \ 1 CO 1 — — — I I �- '1�1� \ �G� SF SURMOUNTABLE CO i VALLEY GUTTERI I I �� �' �369 ' CURB & GUTTER, TYP. d\ r STREET LIGHT (TYP.)_ I � � � � o i � /• it 8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL ��' PED RAMP -SEE- i 1 QP� \ // /� // • 01 ~ (TYP.) DETAILS, TYP. 1 ''� /CO '� ''� ''� ''� / • SURMOUNTABLE > / I l � CURB & GUTTR, TYJ 0 0 00�e I j CD I I I I I I 1 I r` x __,, I Qp J Civil Engineering ^ Surveying Landscape Architecture I 1 I I 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 II � I I I I I 1 II II I I I I St. Louis Park, MN 55416 � o I i II,I civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 Ilol l I I I I v'-a J j II I III I, a o I I�u POND I 1 1 1-35' 1 1 L II E0� _ — � ' I 1 35' DITCH —~— -I� / �� i 1 EASEMENT — — — WETLAND D2 — — LL 3774 SF ODo Qiw- 01 c`J (/✓1 cp \y,�J46 V1 I I 1 910.14 I I ~o� 1 L D&U�SMT. (TYP.j1 I 1 CP �-ox � I 1 �I00 ,w x Q Nn I II 1 r, R46' — _J II I I 1 _ -- —�co I I 1 I oo I I� PASSIVE MOWED TRAIL — — D&U ESMT. — _ — — o / L Ak Ak � / \ - / / \ —I (TY .) J W J l z I �� I , WETLAND E / / 1 \ / \ O~u� // P 1 �z I I I D&U ESMT. : w / ■ 1 67,678 SF / \� lco co ' 1 J (TYP.) co i \ / 1 \ 1° \ \ 11 �/1 D&U ESMT. (TYP.) 1 4 r 1 1 \ po PO \ , �a / 1 1 LIMITS OF IQ� 1 2 3 4 __ ��� pxso, \ Q �J ,� I 1 < 40'x70' 40'x70' 40'x70' 40 x60 , BASIN 4 • qp 2 \ / 1 / CONSTRUCTION PAD PAD PAD PAD J - ��`�' 40'x70' 35' DITCH NWL=913.00 \ I 1 oolvo.( `;\ • OUTLET EL=9t.00 0� I ' PAD \ / jl EASEMENT _ _ OUTLET EOF=914.50 C 7 I I / j 100-YR HWL=914.93 P So 7361 SF I/ 5�` `��6 LIMITS OF LIMITS OF 613 Q CONSTRUCTION �J — — —, — 1 _ V V�°l$3' CONSTRUCTION — — I --SF L--_J 9541SF 12251SF 11896 SF 7002 SF 7002 SF I Rim=919.12 — — — , / N89°40'02"E 1320.77 EOF 1soi.7 INv= - - - - - - - - - I LIMITS OF \ - \ ��I —"—'—' 914.50 LIMITS OF I 1 907.64— CONSTRUCTION LIMITS OF FUTURE CONSTRUCTION TRAIL BY �WW���������� OTHERS-- 1000000 Parcel ID: 0703121440004 Owner: CITY OF HUGO D&U , ESMT. (TYP.) 1 I Edge of Woods • • '110� / __ ,\ I I • � •� � ------Wire Fence I • WETLAND X - 8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL ` (TYP.) ♦ WON WIN.I. an ,40/ �' ' PUBLIC STREET (60' ROW) W _ _ _ \ , / LIMITS OF SURMOUNTABLE o WETLAND i� / ,� CONSTR TION CURB & GUTTER, TY . H FFE- ' 921-90 y 1 �,� I Parcel I D: 0312 440001 E w Ewer / �' Owner: CI OF H GO Q91R Q71 RR Haares 5290 I n I i-I Si N I ri I HUGO. N 55038 1 6 \OCS � =75 R1M \ SMH — / nv=9,,.,, Rim= \J I5.17 CBR Rim=919.12 Inv=916.02 I I Wo ", r1 �I.uo I T � I - � I z m - FUTURE ACCESS o DRIVEWAY BY CITY i a o I � � I a) 1z m I Gravel Drive I j �I— i I: 1 CONSTRUCTION � I I SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE M M M M M CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CURB AND GUTTER -SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUT GUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE -SEE PLAN SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE). SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED. HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGN NP = NO PARKING FIRE LANE ST = STOP CP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY CITY OF HUGO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES. PARK CALCULATIONS: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES. PUBLIC STREET CURB LINE ROW LINE I I LOT NUMBER PAD SIZE I 29'X70' LOT LINE o l I I PAD 1 4—MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 5,400 SF D & U EASEMENT l 10' FRONT & REAR 5' SIDE (TYP.) BUILDING SETBACK 25FRONT L- — — — - 30' REAR 44.00' 7.5' SIDES/ 15SIDE ROW TYPICAL 2-STORY VILLA HOME SINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION: PUBLIC STREET T CURB LINE BROW LINE I I LOT NUMBER PAD SIZE I 40'X70' I LOT LINE o l l I PAD 1 MINIMUM LOT SIZE: 16,750 SF D & U EASEMENT I l 10' FRONT & REAR F SIDE (TYP.) BUILDING SETBACK I 25' FRONT L-------j 30'REAR 50.00' — — F SIDES/ 16 SIDE ROW TYPICAL 1-STORY VILLA HOME SINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION: O� 0 0 0 Know what's below. Call before you dig. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KEVIN TE P N DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 26980 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY 1 DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SITE PLAN C201 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP I 0703121440005 -Y OF HUGO D&U ESMT. (TYP.) — 8' BIT. TRAIL (TYP.) I I I I I I I I � X I I I � FUTURE I N M TRAIL BY I r OTHERS I I I I M I � I o I Ln I o I O I o I V) I I I I I LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION I I I D&U 1 ESMT. 1 (TYP.) I I I I I , Parcel ID: 0803121320002 Owner: MUNGER FAMILY LIVING TRS Address: 5311 165TH ST N Parcel ID: 0803121320001 Owner: MUNGER FAMILY LIVING TRS I I I LIMITS OF PASSIVE MOWED LIMITS OF TRAIL CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION -L- = - - - - - — — — — — — — — 1 I - - - D&U ESMT. (TY .) 4 � EO TEMP. SA EQF BL0�,74 SF / 9500 SF 8264 SF C 0� ' --------- 10' �1 10' ------ram -----------� -- p�, 21249 SF \ 17637 SIF �'� . — — — / - I I I I `C' o ILL 0 1 Q \ 1 _\_ __ ♦ / o I I I 40'x60' I I / i / x N v �^r�� S� I 1 I\\ i �/M `` 5 r X Q I I I / W N CD to 35 DITCH D&U EMI` (TYP.) \ \ • /L g�OG I I I PAD 2/ � I��, EASEMENT /I =R4i7 .� �� I � a - - - D&U ESMT. (TYP.)`♦♦ /- - - - - - R 1 j 40 x70 I I 3 I` - -7 / • • , , • �'�/ ` L ` \ PAD k7 / , /. , /� I /�� � PASSIVE MOWED �♦♦ '� q ' �� I � o / / TRAIL I I • — \\ X. -DLO \ boo . I I 4 /� XQ 1 /L, J _ 'j I• W ND D1 ♦� \ \ / T \ • ♦' Ov G �\� co I I / A rj� ' / y ' /l N / /N / �.' , LIMITS OF �'`\10,900 S�:�/ G� \\ \\ ♦ `♦ - — - — �` 1 13 CO \` \ �� /�1 - - - - - - I r / �� CONSTRUCTION � i � � ` � ♦ ��0 \ \ \ \ 29fZx70' � ♦ `' . � � 113'a � — —� L / / J�/�' � � — � , 1 ► /��Q'41 �� \\ \\ PAD / ` ` \ \ -- 4 / / / Cl) p ! I I O� / I/ 00 � N \\ \ \ / / /� \ 8' BITUMINOUS TRAIL M o \ \ \ \\ \ / r \ ' // ,o tj /� ` (TYP.)rj - 1 o \� \ \ \ \ - \ '„`/ �'► O / ED R MP, SE ' AIL \� S. I ■ i � , z � Q� ����,' `, � /� / � moo? � � , co C)/ '°qo I 4 Fm) I / ■40, r� �`♦♦ \ �/ 40'x70' I 40,5 0, R 50'� N I ' ` 1 PAD I 1 _ _ _ _ — - -- BLOC 6\ / PAD I / _ I I ------- R44 /��a9�\ ♦,uy �osK tit• / f I I ll I BASIN 1 N � --- --- I I / v ------_ _--� . � AWL-914.59 — - - - - - - /� �Q _�' L-----J SURMOUNTABLE � / � OUTLET EL=914.50 '�°_ sF ♦ 8384 SF CURB & GiATW9FTYP.100-YR HWL-915.64 p — _ — — — — _— — 31 I; WETLAND A /� / POND i II N I I POND I I 63,656 SF / �� I II L — _ — — J 0o I I CO� N I I I %� / I I ! s I I I �t 1 I. C:)Q , AL A14 AL O I N \ \ �/ ��� - ` • I S TREET�(YP� - - - D&U ESMT. (TYP.` • �' / - D RAMP, SEE -- \ / -- M I o o - - \ \ / 8' BIT TRAIL (TYP. r _ memo" ' _ - 0� O xQ ,� ♦C14 rND_ ` ♦ / I / A, SURM— 1-7 - - � ' ♦ � \ • � CNTABLE ' 4, CURB & GU TER, TYP.no - AL -� \ I ♦ • 0b0 ♦ / / \ /O I� ♦♦ \ ■ S� I 4► / (TYP.) ID C:1 ♦ / O: 8\ 2 299 S.P�4 �j / / > o���� \ $ - - -, L - ''� � o f � N < I INS c0 N yft :l————— — — — — —� P" ESTYP.) � / / / / �' R20'\�, < j � =G 1 BASIN 2 \ \ \ \ o I/ NWL=914.50 \\ \` \�STREF�T/ / < \\ \ r0 \ \\ \\ \ o ITV I N � a / OUTLET EL=914.5$ ♦ ,' - \ \ \ p� \ \ \ r N ■ 1 ♦\v LIG YP.) \ \\ \ \ \ \ - ■ 1100-YR HWL=915.54 Il / • / / \\\ 6 \ \\ 2 QP� \ / i°1 I '■ �G' / C WETLAND FI NGq —— LL o—— _�,0-78— ■ 5 CONCRETE ■ I / \ Q \ \ \� / / , �I -I --♦ —SID�EWA-LsK—.(TYP.) / \ �\ \ In o ARABLE � .X pa6��TBACK (2 U�NN --- \ I 6ll\/ \ \ L --- PUBLIC STREETCURB LINE r � ROW LINE I I LOT NUMBER PAD SIZE 29'x70' LOT LINE 01 i PAD I I 4—MINIMUM LOT SIZE: I I 1 1 I D& U EASEMENT 10' FRONT & REAR 5' SIDE (TYP.) BUILDING SETBACK 25' FRONT L------J 30'REAR 44.00' — — 7.5' SIDES/ 15' SIDE ROW TYPICAL 2-STORY VILLA HOME SINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION: PUBLIC STREET rCURB LINE � \-ROW LINE I I LOT NUMBER PAD SIZE 40WY LOT LINE oIi i PAD 11 1 I ' 6, MINIMUM SF LOT SIZE: I I D & U EASEMENT 10' FRONT & REAR 5' SIDE (TYP.) BUILDING SETBACK 25' FRONT L - - _ - I 30' REAR 50.00' — — F SIDES/ 15' SIDE ROW TYPICAL 1-STORY VILLA HOME SINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION: PARK CALCULATIONS: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES. N o � ■ WETLAND H /� / 0 s / / /� / ■ ' 1555 SF ��``' � J ■' (DITCHED) //84r /// #* ST/R ET 7 / I i o a / � L �� H HifHii H� 141 / / ■ / Of N o pal cd co L/ l l I l 11 �/ \♦♦ -- -------------------- /--— o DITCH 7 _',-------Edge of Water 9 ---------------------------------- 1I �, I Ico I I I I I o o J -� I I I i j I , `�v0 I I i 35' DITCH I LL I' 0 I I I i I EASEMENT 1 2A,69 5' ; I I l2 I I I / ' 1 I �x�� J �I I I I I I D o I, D&U EASEMENT (TYP.)Ilk 1 I I I I I I i 1 LIMITS OF I I I I i 1 CONSTRUCTION j r I I 1 POND I LL III II III to I I 'i i o I j BASIN 5 o Cb 1 I j I o o J I I NWL=911.50 OUTLET EL=911.50 '� l i i 100-YR HWL=913.46 N l l I I I �1 ' I I I �i 111 CD VARIABLE FRONT SETBACK (25' MINIMUMI I �I I I I I I I II I ■II ICI I I I I I I 11 II axo _j II II 1 I 1 o f I I I I I I 1 I CITY OF HUGO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES. WETL 58,54 SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE �N D 8 SF M I■ CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CURB AND GUTTER -SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUT GUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE -SEE PLAN SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE). l SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED. /6 HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGN NP = NO PARKING FIRE LANE ST = STOP CP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY 0 0 0 Know what's below. Call before you dig. 0 0 0 c� m o U � Civil Engineering ^ Surveying . Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 0 2 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KEVIN TE P N DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE No. 26980 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SITE PLAN C202 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE M M M M M CONSTRUCTION LIMITS I I I I I I I I I I I I z ;I - Know what's below. Call before you dig. 0Rov � qo�e m O M p Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 O N N LO u7 E Z O N V� z -0 2 o J o CD O _ Q) Cl) � > � >0 a' 0 0 O � o 0 s c� I- C) W O I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KEVIN TE P N DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 26980 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION OFF SITE EASEMENT EXHIBIT C203 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP IN GENERAL GRADING NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL LAYOUT & GENERAL GRADING NOTES. 3. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLETE THE SITE GRADING CONSTRUCTION (INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO SITE PREPARATION, SOIL CORRECTION, EXCAVATION, EMBANKMENT, ETC.) IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. ALL SOIL TESTING SHALL BE COMPLETED BY THE OWNER'S SOILS ENGINEER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR COORDINATING ALL REQUIRED SOIL TESTS AND INSPECTIONS WITH THE SOILS ENGINEER. 4. GRADING AND EXCAVATION ACTIVITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT REQUIREMENTS & PERMIT REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. 5. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 6. PROPOSED SPOT GRADES ARE FLOW -LINE FINISHED GRADE ELEVATIONS, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. GRADES OF WALKS SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH 5% MAX. LONGITUDINAL SLOPE AND 1% MIN. AND 2% MAX. CROSS SLOPE, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. PROPOSED SLOPES SHALL NOT EXCEED 3:1 UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE ON THE DRAWINGS. MAXIMUM SLOPES IN MAINTAINED AREAS IS 4:1 9. PROPOSED RETAINING WALLS, FREESTANDING WALLS, OR COMBINATION OF WALL TYPES GREATER THAN 4' IN HEIGHT SHALL BE DESIGNED AND ENGINEERED BY A REGISTERED RETAINING WALL ENGINEER. DESIGN DRAWINGS SHALL BE SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 10. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTENANCE OF GRADE STAKES THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION TO ESTABLISH PROPER GRADES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ALSO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR A FINAL FIELD CHECK OF FINISHED GRADES ACCEPTABLE TO THE ENGINEER/LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO TOPSOIL AND SODDING ACTIVITIES. 11. IF EXCESS OR SHORTAGE OF SOIL MATERIAL EXISTS, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALL EXCESS SOIL MATERIAL OFF THE SITE TO AN AREA SELECTED BY THE CONTRACTOR, OR IMPORT SUITABLE MATERIAL TO THE SITE. 12. EXCAVATE TOPSOIL FROM AREAS TO BE FURTHER EXCAVATED OR REGRADED AND STOCKPILE IN AREAS DESIGNATED ON THE SITE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SALVAGE ENOUGH TOPSOIL FOR RESPREADING ON THE SITE AS SPECIFIED. EXCESS TOPSOIL SHALL BE PLACED IN EMBANKMENT AREAS, OUTSIDE OF BUILDING PADS, ROADWAYS AND PARKING AREAS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBCUT CUT AREAS, WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED, TO A DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. RESPREAD TOPSOIL IN AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 6 INCHES. 13. FINISHED GRADING SHALL BE COMPLETED. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL UNIFORMLY GRADE AREAS WITHIN LIMITS OF GRADING, INCLUDING ADJACENT TRANSITION AREAS. PROVIDE A SMOOTH FINISHED SURFACE WITHIN SPECIFIED TOLERANCES, WITH UNIFORM LEVELS OR SLOPES BETWEEN POINTS WHERE ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN, OR BETWEEN SUCH POINTS AND EXISTING GRADES. AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN FINISH GRADED SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS, TRAFFIC AND EROSION. REPAIR ALL AREAS THAT HAVE BECOME RUTTED BY TRAFFIC OR ERODED BY WATER OR HAS SETTLED BELOW THE CORRECT GRADE. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY THE CONTRACTOR'S OPERATIONS SHALL BE RESTORED TO EQUAL OR BETTER THAN ORIGINAL CONDITION OR TO THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NEW WORK. 14. PRIOR TO PLACEMENT OF THE AGGREGATE BASE, A TEST ROLL WILL BE REQUIRED ON THE STREET AND/OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A LOADED TANDEM AXLE TRUCK WITH A GROSS WEIGHT OF 25 TONS. THE TEST ROLLING SHALL BE AT THE DIRECTION OF THE SOILS ENGINEER AND SHALL BE COMPLETED IN AREAS AS DIRECTED BY THE SOILS ENGINEER. THE SOILS ENGINEER SHALL DETERMINE WHICH SECTIONS OF THE STREET OR PARKING AREA ARE UNSTABLE. CORRECTION OF THE SUBGRADE SOILS SHALL BE COMPLETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SOILS ENGINEER. NO TEST ROLL SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 10' OF ANY UNDERGROUND STORM RETENTION/DETENTION SYSTEMS. 15. TOLERANCES 15.1. THE BUILDING SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.30 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION AT ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 15.2. THE STREET OR PARKING AREA SUBGRADE FINISHED SURFACE ELEVATION SHALL NOT VARY BY MORE THAN 0.05 FOOT ABOVE, OR 0.10 FOOT BELOW, THE PRESCRIBED ELEVATION OF ANY POINT WHERE MEASUREMENT IS MADE. 15.3. AREAS WHICH ARE TO RECEIVE TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO WITHIN 0.30 FOOT ABOVE OR BELOW THE REQUIRED ELEVATION, UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE BY THE ENGINEER. 15.4. TOPSOIL SHALL BE GRADED TO PLUS OR MINUS 1/2 INCH OF THE SPECIFIED THICKNESS. 16. MAINTENANCE 16.1. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT NEWLY GRADED AREAS FROM TRAFFIC AND EROSION, AND KEEP AREA FREE OF TRASH AND DEBRIS. 16.2. CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR AND REESTABLISH GRADES IN SETTLED, ERODED AND RUTTED AREAS TO SPECIFIED TOLERANCES. DURING THE CONSTRUCTION, IF REQUIRED, AND DURING THE WARRANTY PERIOD, EROSION CONTROL NOTES: SEE SWPPP ON SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 CITY OF HUGO GRADING NOTES: ALL PONDS SHALL BE CLAY LINED. DICE CREEK WATERSHED NOTES: ALL ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THE PLANS ARE IN VGVD29. TO CONVERT TO NAVD88 ADD 0.15'. GRADING PLAN LEGEND: EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 �41.26 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 891.00 G SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTER 891.00 TC SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB 891.00 BS/TS SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS 891.00 ME SPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTING GB GRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EOF=1135.52 �■■■■WETLAND I I h6 9� g ------ -I - _____-_ I a I g+6 I I I I , I I � • � I � I II LIMITS OF _ �'46n CONSTRUCTION E F s1 LOCK 4 EOF +2 I I 1 _ ■ o� � � g Fl I w I ► N B 10/ R18 S11 1�fl WETLANDD1 ♦ tuMirsoF 10,900S ,6 2 ♦ \ , 'P.CONSTRUCTION M N WETLAND H / / / 1 1555 SF ► a / / / 2 (DITCHED) `r ` IFig) u/ 4 I 5 / / N / ��m� / 0 i ` 'LOCK LOC _ 9 K6 \� o \10 - � t . y I SS.14 BASIN 1 i ` ;6 s ANWL=914.59 I I e ♦ OUTLET EL=914.50 I I I F oN ♦ 100-YR HWL=915.64 _ DITCH 7 � WETLAND A a I I I I d 1 63,656 SF vo I I -914�m000 I I LO 01 - \ I I \ ♦ 1 1 f= i- II II I LIMITS OF CONSTRUC TION N ASlamq� I z `� ♦ '6 I I L I / / E+ I I A6 // l / \ ♦ / - - I I I ET L 1. I I I G O HWL 1 I O J M � f I � � 9'6 9,e � \ 16 / T A � II y r/ II 9 w 13_4 - I� I I I �, Q M- _0 I g+6 Ln I I BASIN 2 I I I O O NWL=914.50 `s \ \ \ Ql N mmm I omgom o� I I I L OUTL'1T EL=914.9b '♦ r i I m I I, o 100-YR HWL=915.54 II a LIMITS OF WEl I 11 r• r• / \ I M I � coNsrRucrloN I I WETLAND F • / / OG r III 5$ I I I $ k F / d \ \ > 9�6 rn � / I`✓ I I I /O^ O 7 ' V O ��//��y I I B_7 � t_ y11 \ I I i �18 ' I I '�- ti \ S \ \ m I \\ 531-6 I W O .� 11 kl \ » ZO \ / I 1 \ o 10 - 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, _ I / SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS BASIN 3 ♦ PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT I I 1 NWL=915.00 \ / - 918 _ ETLAND 12 ♦ 9`ti I I I - SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY E F 4 TLET FL=915.0 Z� 774 SF I �' I I 1 -YR HWL=916.4 LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER I I I I I WETLAN 9'6 I I os15 I - UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF (C 0 \0\\ Ro\e c m o U Y, Civil Engineering - Surveying - Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 ERODED AREAS WHERE TURF IS TO BE ESTABLISHED SHALL BE RESEEDED AND MULCHED. I I 7 16.3. WHERE COMPLETED COMPACTED AREAS ARE DISTURBED BY SUBSEQUENT CONSTRUCTION OPERATIONS OR ADVERSE WEATHER, CONTRACTOR SHALL SCARIFY, SURFACE, RESHAPE, AND COMPACT TO REQUIRED DENSITY PRIOR TO FURTHER CONSTRUCTION. / WETLANDX ` I I I LIMITS OF ♦ _ CONSTRUCTION �m m ♦ ,+, 9 9yo LIMITS OF J Et \ / CTION I I 921. 24.5 h \ 91 NV= 916.31 914fd OOS V Inv=905;�17, CBR Rim=919.12 III nv=916.02 IN � / IN = MH 915.82 / O SMH Rim=9 95 ,avOC - L - LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION r �-� 16,910 / MINNESOTA. SF ;� � I I I - --- � WETLAND 8Zk I - - I I IMITS OF 2 s1o1a \�// 58,590 SF 1 I eN�T ° v1 / a \ \ 910 ~ l �I I� 1 0 ' Matthew R. Pavek I I CIA 0 F -- 1 �•.� / \ \ \\ I / DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 I I ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY \ 9 I DATE DESCRIPTION _m l I 1I 12/4/20 CITY SUBMITTAL 12/13/20 REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL SB5 ' �'/ / 12/23/20 REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL 1/5/20 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL O 1/26/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL / 1 I sso j WETLAND E I 9+e W (/ 67,678 SF \ i� 1 4 �� r , 1 3 4 xd LIMITS OF 2 1 BASIN 2 a �� /� CONSTRUCTION / NWL=913.00 1 y ` OtYTLET EL=9t3.00 i -zo r�JI OU(Vo - - - -� ,� 00UOTLETEOF=914.3 au oU P S�l 9/ r WETL/ 918 16 S� LIMITS OF 4 n 4 LIMITS OF 1 0 la3+ CONSTRUCTION 914 CONSTRUCTION 916 ,a SMH - - EOF Ri- 914.50 LIMITS OF i - - LIMITS OF 9 - 2 907.64 CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION / DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 LsLc♦ , I / \ REVISION SUMMARY ❑_-o\ � I / DATE DESCRIPTION I / / \ LOW FLOOR-920.�-LOW F 00 I LOOR=919.70 � / � // /♦ LOW FLOOR \ =918_50(p@r{ot cert; verify LOW FLOOR-918.00 per o cert, veufy�OW FLOOR=919.00 / r blot-cer�erify) ' / \ OVERALL \ _ LOW FLOOR=918.50 (per lot cent, verify) lot t cert, verify) n - - / � / no`�kl GRADING PLAN \ TNH= \ I 92,." Know what's below. 1" = 80'-0" Call before you dig. nmnm%mmmmmmmm 40'-0" o BoUjimu QC COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. LIMITS OF I 9 912-. CONSTRUCTION 1WETLANDF I II $ I- iI V15.43 '� /914.-* in �.00 1.+ &oo S96 t 2 rII ,g - 0 � o IIIII 19- . 000 s J f1 \ OO O z o I \ I I o rn OW N I j 91 I .15 I m o 0\ d JO I I I I - --- - -- -its. ��\ I t•L o 0 x z Lo O Lu O\ O� 919.50 �I I m p 22 I d _j I -a -----o I zJ1a.a2 z LO Ow 919.- \ I X g2°5° I I \ I g1�ll� a Q X o_ w L� I 92 19 I - - - - - - - - - - I - -- I - 919• I X g2o I I I I I I oo 0 e of Woods------� I I I I o 0 0 °' M mo rn I I - 92 1 58 I L--- II Qa II /\ I N I - - <\x i �I I C� O O 0 I N W N I I I I m a <� I I I --Wire Fence Oa3 I 92.591 -------- O ' ° 2 ' 02MID I I 0 z N W N 0)r O 0) Xg2° J� Ili I /Xo�; I I I -- _ - - - - 40 _ y9-- 918.40 - -- --- _-- I I T,2- - � 919 5° I / / F /l /�/\ \ // / i / \/ F�g\19 \ 9.z o\\\\F \ .9\2'�� FP\tpP9O\ �\ .\ \ \\ \F \ �g\\\ go3\ 1 •g�p0\0\P \0\\� \\\Q\.\ \ \\\/ g\\1g\' \�\ P\\0 �\\\N \Q\ p\ 9 1\\g\\5° \ \V\F\P \t\8P p\\F \p g\ \5 \/° \9\\1\\$ \\ \�P 9\L0// /\\\\ \\ `/\\\\ /(�V�/�! %5\ L/' / / p/9II/ I orIII6/- --- -u-ro o - - - o a -- --- ------- 0 42�67� ';�1I��IIIIII II1II IIIIIIIII Ii$I III II IIi2IIIIlIIII' I IIII IIII II I III Z 75 o w 0i5 I �'rn Mm¢a 00 _jW ILL ofN�0 �989 91 LID HP x F o o � z m IL 9�78OQ m O B.;7 12.6 I- - n I I oj 71 QILL IL9I1.50 ,9.14 o (if CID1s.ov0 °' --- `aC, s1540 =st�50\.0j I - - J�I- 1 I Ii \�\\\P/69 �'o LO O 918 O sh 0i0 II II s,3.0c915. z LLJ - I ♦ \ \R \ 50\ \ \\ / , C'\ O oa' Q ° I a'7II 35' II of a I Z O -6Or\\ 1 � I Sd 916,1071 I BE- RM l� \T 9,6 °IIII Yso i917.50 EOF -- - - - aN 7 `♦♦ 9/\ \ Q�9\ \ \\RPpE \\ \ g1g50 \\ \ s.s � ��, s,. -- ♦♦� �� ��-�/ II�IIIIII ■ 915.86 .15 �1 \\ \ \ ON \ \ 50\ \\ 917.15 916.11 �� -916 ---- -J / ♦� `- _/ II III III �♦ \ �,��/ \ \ 0° \ \ POp�c \ �g1g \ \ 9 . o� 1 _ � 1 F 914.50 1 I I mF s .. O 91500 916.39L� O z� . �•\ ' -o.ez `- ' ►9♦10`'x \. \ I�P,<g,,\.5Z0r sts�59 o oz �¢ o 5 9t75 IIBASIN -��'os V) 9,&56- 9rAND D2 II IIIII ' Ij II III Igg��IIII,IIilI I�lIIIIjIIIIIIlII IlIII 9T�l -O,aP.0-BoTLT FL=915.0 8.37 1 O 9,,0 774 SFyc r � 10-YR HTKRI 1 0 ER- M ♦ IIII I IIIII_, l\ WETLAND\G ,g` \ GFILL --90> 116,910SN0 913.00 ,L 190 a 15. 5 >� II �►I IIII'I- -.- ' I I 915.00 - 1P E 911.50�\� .� o. X9'' I 913.00 \ ,e.S1 \ a. a 0° \ N \ GRPp o �� I 9,°12 I' n � o IMITS OF �j\ , / �e�° \ �P0 E \ I Ln z0 \ (2 �,6 O_ I ■ 11 str5kf"S� ♦ sy!£.s9 i // �i \ \ G�Po \ 00 I I I I \ • s.5o / / \\\ 6.031 n W F - N� \ si�HO/ �' G� J I 4 �♦ HP \ O 50 F vi --- 11 1 I TOPB M oa 19 6.28 G Q - - �xl \ I �� \ � \\ \ S1,PPpF- 9N9• \ t2.aY � �, � tea- - - I I II \ .2 ■ ♦ 0 915.48 J p0 \ GF� RP / % - \ �I I / 4 \r �11911.50 N .5 I III I o 9t2.a2 o z 0 > MATCH I �/� O W I 910 9� / ♦ O \ RP % 00 g1\fl 9 / 9, ., �l/ o F) \ 1 I I I I I 91 .22912.8J��(p 915.93 F�O� 0000 \ ,300/° MATCIi rn \ 909.5 I I I o,II III \ CID,,,� \ I l 1 I III \ �i \\Q 912.37 m o 0$ I - - \ `/N 0 MATCH O \ O� QQ 16 V ' 1 I II I I \ a m m 6 55 • 1� r 97 91878 0° \ ���PO� \ / / MATCH I 915.26 \ \ a0 91 z OW O\911..I I I 11 I �II�I III \\ 117 6 < �/�I �0 G �000 ��� /. ^ ,u1� AIL 911.00 �Iu� /� • sts.os 1 ma a I I I ' II �5V1 \ \-917.so SB-5 ofTOP 91 913.00� / I s„s yl�lll I xg�. 91 27 / • / ' g - J MATH I 911.00 917.22LP Y .uc I IIllc \ �G� �Illr. IIllr. - 917.87 917.07RIM I 0 \ / �/ 1 /\ HP .61 91/ I 87 ►'�I = 3 rI b.uu /oy / /• Z\ 9. j� .00 \/ I /♦ // 91 oII, r_i7. 9918.43 ALI �jlu �jlu - XZ _91;0o s,7. 2- 9209 1 Ja°.ga x\9`9�•IIIII `•>�N��� N _I F II IiIIi (/\ ,/V113.66 EMATCH WETLAND ETLAND E V GF��9/8GF=919.50 jq GF=920.50 GF=920.50 GF=919.50 W 67678 SF / I 911.00 s132 oo I 91�00 914.f � ,� IJL 911.00�AT.,� GF=9189.1580 \\ rIII lI Ill Il l'l \l N> SS� T\ \ \c rn . 1 \ \ L)MIT - SLA4oN 914.00o SLA ON SLA ON SLA ON 3■ qO/ 9�50 f ° z GRADE GRADE GRADE GRADE MST 11 % 913.91 SLAB 91 .5%'25 1 MATCH 915.00 N ll).913.0044NWL=913.00 X �20 91800 GRADE R\ \\ gO \y RP=919.50 916.16 OULET EL=913.00 22 -o MAT MATC00 RP=20.50 RP=920.50 RP=919.50 Vol OUTLET O9.0w 1.00 NO I I V`No_ �BEgMT MATCH 100- 3 RP=918.50 2°9.00 s,,.5o NIII 7191500 14 N g 1I I l Dr g� I 918 ^ 6 LIMITS OF + / 2 LIMITS OF ���- � l \ 915 914 9 1.71 k o�/ �, J V �/ l$3 t CONSTRUCTION \ 9 CONSTRUCTION 914.39 I - - , 914.35 \�---_ ._6'1- �18.96 0'� k05 _ 916.33 i xg. <g 2 g�1 � ----erg � X 2 � 14.28� 1ri--1- 914.97 V � 1, ---- _ -- SMH �__-// -_-- vv / ''_ \_�-915- i� 077 �� V x •� x / / -� �\ \ g JL 913.00 913. \ / i / � i 251�v � v g� \ '�°�- � � - _ 914.0� 1 y INV- LIMITS OF' / r915'��/ ���i�/ 9 \� �\ 9 // // 91�.`�Q\\\G�IVSTF�UCTION 14 ///---------913' _. , , - _ CONSTRUCTIOryJ/ I / `5�/�� /` ----___��2 \\\\ \ I / \ \ \\ y \ > /�- 1 4` I�I xea_ X v�v // / \ \ \ �� / �� _ _ _ 98 \V c� I l�l IIII A X9 I � / // e� I .590 ♦ g��° k21 _ °%j��-' ��' \ \ \\,/ �``S \ \ \ \ 1� -`� \\ - --- \ X g / / \ - \ I `DIY `CII g2° gTI) I co x x j 92 19 j C 411 g I I Xg2° \ x'Ili �g \ 01 °gk x / g o 2 \V X z k I\ x,,a $ / 11 1 // �\ Edge of Woods -----� I ( CD / _ N qN / p6 \ I 92 58p I / X I g2, / I I I p x9, 92° /\\ I O� xg2k9 x xg21/ / v// /// x92 I 998 T 0, / \, 9gOc�2 X < x92I 1 wl a I �I ET I I I xg2,y$ // Xg2°6o /ter/ , ��gs$ -Wire Fence I I I I I 5 \� \ ors I sz .5s / I xg2 5° // I / / ° `1jFT-tAND X \ °j21 022 I \ g2 \ 8 I \\ Xg\g k2 \\ X //� 922° / / _I I 0'Z�0°� \,IIII \\\\,IIIc 'R\X9�9� xg2 /// WET00 \ / / \ \ LIMITS OF I /,/ / / \ \ \ x9 / ♦ -T I I \ \\ g xg2 \� // CONSTRUCTION / 1 �WEr\� ,5 \ / / ♦ I 19 91 , I r \ g�0 / 1 ♦ alYc x g�a a�-c - - ;'IL` ` _ ♦ I - - \\ X \- ' �' 9------- $ ' 21 g6 ,A Gi \-91S 57 I} _ \9------zt I CO TION 5 \\ 209g 2 I N I �a�2� g2°°° ro g �� 0 I � I� g�a5 FFE= v 2 X 12� I- z I g2206 921.90 U2 I / I 1 1 g I \ \ I E Water Tower a� g N Xg208� Xg6 �°--I- I N I ,� o 00 24.59 011 Q;Qvel Dr'ye g� I g�g,2 gee •91g--------------- Rim�gj lbw RIM '� �� o- SMH g0 \ g - -goo - o R' .67 / g2�� g V A g �e 1 I \ A sM 60299°\ �RUSK 'Im s.12\\\�S-29y\� \ \\\ \\\\e�8 I l g2 \ \\ g� /?� \ g2 5nr-916.02 Xg22�\ \\\\ \ ��8 \ I X,g'`°i \ \\\ 3a� g•g9a0 91 ^0, k6. , /66g6 I I\ \ \ ha \ \ \ ��\ \ \ I I \\ ^-y0 \X g gg'I GRADING PLAN LEGEND: EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL �41.26 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 891.00 G SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTER 891.00 TC SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB 891.00 BS/TS SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS 891.00 ME SPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTING -------------------- GB GRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EOF=1135.52 �■■■■ WETLAND 0 O Know what's beIow. Call before you dig. (C OR 0R7HO R� a m O M p Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION GRADING PLAN C301 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP I / L ` III ��IIII�I I �916h x9 / / / / / x9 I I 9��--- o� o I �o X -iV h �2 \ / \Xeh� % e>'�_ X e / / vx�_g2--__e�//� eo 10��0 xo \ ,h x o 0°2 tD g, - -914- - - - q, a 1,gt o l /- L __ I LIMITS OF LIMITS OF --- I ��` CONSTRUC�I ,�1 /��_913- 913s0 2,k I- . 1 - -\ II IjIIII II / CONSTRUCTION o_ 91fi.74 916.94 I i��i'1�N � ii.. ... 4� � � 1-.1■■ 1 , 9!!!/ i7■ri --L--- x/� � IIII �ay15. 0 I I Irn s s.os I X - lt 916 916.00-/ i ro 5. 4, 915.07 914.81 EOF \ 9 oB 917.00 a I K��IL a_ ^ a�w ��--)� -12 2 I I--------------9_150--- \------- 1O' rn0ml �� 10' -9 ------------� 9, - o °� 91 - �5130� 9 �/ /9W.5 I / II \, / o �I RP=9�.50 I I �1' I / / \s rn o pa 1 `911. OU `911.50 / / // I 5 Y� 914.50 -\� - - ♦ 9 / I z o^ I I I 1 I I // I m o m rn / o�X '/ // x 9 I 1 I - 913 a6 O I = / rn ¢c� rn 1 / / �// \ / ' t■ I 0\j rn r ``' I RP-918.50 I I / V) / II N vJi II r�9 _ / / / I / / / oo I \ 913.50 \ \ ■ �91 50 /\ \ \ 1� a as °' I SLAB ON Rp\ I / 0 1 I V \ • • s I R oc 00 I GRADE /yam 978 �, Q - ��0 -- /��!(l �//// / V I �■ I I s0 91.7 / '��I I / 1 I I • • • 914.50 ♦ 913. - _ _ _ I SLAB ON I I / 978 909.50 \ / ♦ J GRADE / / 1 91 67 I I 913.50 • ♦, \ ' ' • - • •915.2 \ I - - rn L916.50 SB 1 P I S� ye / /tA / / "� / �j✓ \ g 6 gp L 1\ GF=918.50 I I G E / 8S� l� l o m < 0 911.50 / • \ 1 ` Y RAO N �9/ / O i O o o I / ^ 9 so �12 // ryr �/� I I/ X �I 11 I I �\ 4\ I �L xr I I I II 11 I I 1 I I i \ I I \ I i \ I Ilo I 11 0166 I I I I \ I l � I AV I II II \ 1 I \ I I I I II I I I \I I \ I I III \\ 1 I I I � 916g9 I I I I I I I I I / \ I / \°hh022 � I Ln / I O 6 /X91� 1 //O Lj / I LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION / I I I \ I \\ I 1 I I ♦♦ \ ♦♦ / ♦� ♦� `' Ov�\' 1\ \ \ \ I I / �/ S<q 4 /� // / oil' N N0 m 1 \\\ ///' / �H/4.50CL II�em'I�11I o■m0s"sI ` 1 , tOs.s II /II I III�I b/f 1I. -I �I -' I 1IIi I II ♦-Mti-L-aiv u= otr\ o-o_o-�. 'm z L �oW -Ea\\O0zo0--rno-I_1TILryAOND- - ♦� mQ\\ D-� 1 \ - --_ \\ ---- -�--Q, ��\\p°--- LL�-I'iI o-\- 0o \- �-0RP9pN\J0-e1SP 81OF3-\ s� /tIa7 .\�,4 \`\♦L \ I \w1 \1 \\/II f /9/`/\\ // $\ // /\ 0�\/o\�♦♦\♦` �s1'^♦�o ��.♦/ `♦ �J1 ■/• ♦ °/o/ \ / I�I�■■/ IlcI 9• \ . \\/� \\/4/A./ \\s/x\a■�` �\ c 0/,� t�\// �°a\V\ ac��\ \) / ,\ �. �L/ / ('-�♦6s`G/� : /g/ / !\�9,/�?�/ / .�.p.A/�o a�T G-- .F��I I= .91I8Iz .95oNn0 • F\a�Qgo?\J o° o'�N / / 90 -6 gZGk9i-yh�7t/u�tooy I I ■IIIIIII °mI a'I�ry.�� /�6 \ ^m /- //\I /I �/o�_ �-/o�o�V 1II I.II 1r/1�.�OI//\/0 Y \/� �h / rn�1 �1 / 9/ �\I1IIi III I II( / \/I/ It'I/ 3/'./ Io �IJ'■■■■■ � I ■ ■/�■ ■ II I / /I♦ II I / /I}I / \ Vs5 \� I/ =MIT/= � /9S O2gF RP=920.00 GF,y18909.5p CONSTRU /C_2 Tz-\ I' /SO -/ /9NS�i10 900 \ oS� 914.51, hA3913.50J t7sa I \ SLABON 13.50 ` � 9800 GRADE M�� �; ■ WETLAND H 4%/N ////t960 ■ ■ 1555SF X P.85 9,4.N �16.80 X ♦�0/9096o 0B1 (DITCHED)16.9, 20.00 rc- - .776/ / o 917.2ssosts. o o /zw 90950- 00 bI X1 1 ✓t sta4 ¢ rn� 3 9i 'aQ 9h N <11.5 o1a.00 4- 0 15.55.0z 9�16o 918.00 911.5� �-" � to 0 zo 917/ LU 0 91 .63 oy GF=918.70 �N m_iO iCL orost7.s � rn�Yz 0 4 91 rn0 W .n° N SLAB ON 6.95- /Z `'o ♦ Xx� /o / / /-/ -/ 5 L xmo a Q 04 � - - - -- 14.00 s,s a --o- - OC/( SLAB ON TOP BER 0 GRADE yTL - - - - - - o� RP=918.0 0)/A OW I I $I o I \�dVWaI RP=918.70 °' �BASIN 1 � 9�s I 9�.00 \ ON 91 2 - - - - - - 914.72VW. ic OUTLET EL=914.50 0 1470 JiRl 16.4 0 °905.50 � 647cq -.V - - 907.50 o __to J< ---Edge ofpater 8 (ncm00 o 0). Q -�------ WETLAND �0c W o 9184 s s� I o 63,656 SF n a; o ------- x bs5 rnMa¢ m X X, u o ncCD 904 0w (P PBERM X0 906 9 5. o Q¢9°° rnZ o �_ -J13--Ow\ \ 6rn90 - - _j of � o LL O0 I 9N0 W O .X x x// XNO �` 914 J OOOVN G ��\9, I 914.00 Coo 0) e 0) 0) 91700 915.70 o9� E�OF 91 OCV t 913.00u 09 c915.0 -91s.,�1 rnrnrnrnrn `4 I 913.00 15.89O /74- 916.89LP 91OZ 6 fn O La 4.99. 914__OO QQ '\ o sa V) CD 914.00 912.50 N I _ LIMITS ONI-T - 1 "� X- "- XS_0. a ° g- /a -6/> snsfs12.s• - 1CONSTRU�TI N 914.66 v mvl \\� ♦ ,aso \ �♦ `. ■ / // / I - - - -si�2 �� / 1 t1� �► \ '\ ` \ I `v g\ \\ \ " I 9j I I \ I 11 IIi �IiI�!1 � 1\ 1 J c�9 @ 14.75 ♦♦ 4.0B0, \ \ �915- J \ \ I" ID 2 299 S 0w \� 0 9T8.50 / W U)i \ \ \ fHP 9 7 16. - - - - - - - - 66 QO \ _\ m� w 9 i � O of S �914.50 tA46 �js 9 r / g1a .s \\\\\ \\ �P°, �h6,4 ''''ll � 8.03---------- 914r50r- 914.50 \ o / °O \- ■ BASIN 2 • \ / 9 9 .so 9 as \ \ F-92 \ �9,ey° 1 / NWL=91-r.liv '� / / 9,$2, \� \ r0 \ \ P \ \ Q 1 I� 0) o I w rn 914.?0 111' `gy2Tj'ffT EL=914.n ■ 100-YR HWL=915.54 1 �914.50 I 912 WETLAND F 5.2'Z• I 1 I 8 I I :915.43 '1i `/ 914._* ■ ■ I s17.00 g16 I 1 I o _ z ��♦ 0- / \ \ ♦ o `L4�♦ / o \ v ♦ ■ Q 3 // . A\ I oS`I 91 / / / /9 9���o/ta\ \\ \ \ `♦ ■/ hJU� / / / f �oz�\ `oq� \mo\ I I 42_ / 00<1 0)Ow \� 0)ao OcOoi 0) 0)N om oNX\9 \I91ho. X,� ' Q \ 1 1 coo ASI I 011 ee X \\ / \ S1 \ 1 17.50 of 00 q 918>15 \ ♦'ll` /�\/ / �2 In z rn I / \ / bw 49 6 A �915.50 • ♦ ■ 01 91 38 916, �s I ■ y"55 O \ I ■ 914.50 (♦/ ♦' \� / Ot<` oZ j t%as `915.38 / ca 916. \\�\ F�919 \\ 9�00 \\�\Q 1 9 -- - No _ - 6 918.52 ^ \ of �O \\\ \ Q/ �\` 916.10I�-------�9, s.0U --- uoi Ion O CO) O W O Coo - LO HPLQ 55 - /Q�9\9 x918 qe r 19a m<< s,5 %o16.02 _ _ _ _ cnc� c� L - I I \ 13160 \ X 0 I I ET EL 1 ;�9�N5 I I il'�IIIII 1 1 I I 0- HWL 1 �hz �, Ihi�, I' I I I IIII 1 / Ln 1 i v I I I � IIII I I I I I \� I\ I I I I III'. I I I I I I I I �\ I I \\ �" U` 1z.5 \ I 1 I I I I I I 910 kg9 I 9 g1� o � o I I I I I ° I II X ) )x9 / X x // X\\ II -�- \�� O v .O 12.7} I I I i I I. ��rt. 9v'S� �,�2. 0 I I 21 I FOP BERM I / X // X X/ X 00 ID 00o 00 000 c�I II I I� 11 III >II o rnrnrnrn o)o)rno)oibo Ifll 1 �0 9J ,I IIIII ► 29 WETL ND 1 Z �o I I I I I/ j 1 I' j II I I I I I I I X g1� %glyo x o12�o I X 911g0 583 9 <n ".0 \ V c1 v 1 I�I I I I 12.6 II I I mmN 1I �I sh 1.so �rn00rn I III'IIIIIIIIII`III- L---- --_ -_I- _ 1 o ' _ p1 1 I I I I I I I i l ll> _ _ \ -o�° - -- _ 9, --g12- - GRADING PLAN LEGEND: EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL �41.26 SPOT GRADE ELEVATION (GUTTER/FLOW LINE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) 891.00 G SPOT GRADE ELEVATION GUTTER 891.00 TC SPOT GRADE ELEVATION TOP OF CURB 891.00 BS/TS SPOT GRADE ELEVATION BOTTOM OF STAIRS/TOP OF STAIRS 891.00 ME SPOT GRADE ELEVATION MATCH EXISTING -------------------- GB GRADE BREAK - HIGH POINTS CURB AND GUTTER (T.0 = TIP OUT) EMERGENCY OVERFLOW EOF=1135.52 ■■�■■� WETLAND 0 � N Know what's below. 1" = 50'-0" Call before you dig. 25-0" 0 50'-0" OR 7 HO OR � G3 O M p Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION GRADING PLAN C302 COPYRIGHT 2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE -USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. 6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION. 10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5' OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. 11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL. 14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. 15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 17. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE -DRILLED. 18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 25. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 26. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0. CITY OF HUGO UTILITY NOTES: LIMITS OF LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION C 0 N S T R U C T I 0 N - - - - - - . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- ----� r------�------I ----7 �- _ - -� 0olv0 2 AL .� . \ I III //Ar / \ \ \ LIMITS OF WE0 C TLAND �D1 5 100 % �OG \ \ 2 ♦ - •t 8A3 SFi - - - I \ \ 0 \ \ I I \ \ 1113 / - � � II I� // '' CONSTRUCTION 03 ,,� \ \\ 3 \\ \ /I ` ,\.. ♦ I y. / �' / / /, N / � 1 I WETLAND H 555 SF1 �' ♦/ \\ \ \�\ I ;� f / j �/ j , �/ - - - - / t (DITCHED) 1 3 4 I I 5 ------ eLOc ; BASIN 1 1 / I � OUTLET EL=914.50 � � � - - __1L - - - 100 J � � > ♦ -YR HWL=915.64 DITCH 7 L L WETLAND A > 1 63,656 SF I ------- ., --- -- � ♦ I I I \ r I I I LIMITS OF 1 1 �� I I I I CONSTRUCTION / ij I I I I Io ff♦ �/ 1�3,8 �� � � I I I I � I I I �' BASIN 5 I I I l� 'yJ� / / / \ ♦ L - - - < I I NWL=911.50 I I I ♦♦ / // / / I - - - I I OUTLET EL=911.50 I I I II Z I r - - - - - - O I I 100-YR HWL=913.46 I 03 BASIN NWL=914.50 `\ / \ \\ \ IQ� N I I I I IOUTL'ET EL=914.9b ' ♦ \ \ \ \ \ I r L (100-YR HWL=915.54 F_ - - WE, \ \\ \ \ G I r I I I I I I I 58, WETLANDF/ -♦ \ \ \\ \ \ °/ �- - - BASIN3 \ \ \\ \\ - • , I � I - - - - - - NWL=915.00 1 \ \\ \ _ _ WETLAND D2 ♦ I I / I I CII JTLET F,4L=915.00 \ Z�► \ \ \ \ I - - \ 3774 SIF FI 1 TYR HWL=916.4 \ \ I I WETLAND \ co 16,910SF\ ���\ \(1\31vo' co 00, \ LIMITS OF / \ \ �� I - \ / WETLAND 8 ; eN$TRllcrloN4 °� °� •\ \ \ a \ ^ < ti 106 s1o.1a �/ 58,590 SF I o 04 - �f; .' \\\ \ ✓� < \ \ III I 1 Z / 1 \ \ , LIMITS OF-/ er I I I fWA ( 41 CTION ^' - I I oc 1 m m m ' • • r I I \ \ \ \ / / j ' LIMITS OF 2 3 \ l CONSTRUCTION ' / I 92i. I - I I 1 I I I 4 J NWLS9N3.00\\ I 1 ♦'_ E °� \� y y Y OUTLET EL 9 40 0 0°1 \ III \\ \ / 1 WETLF / ♦ H= I I 0 G 100-YR HWL=914.93 I I 20 1 \ 24.5 I I I I I G� 11 I I I / �� 2 6 SQ LIMITS -7 LIMITS OF • 183+21�S g1 NV= - ---___ I I I I - - J g�o J - la3' CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION \ V 916.31 914' 0(s Rim=9� ` / I LIMITS OF 9 2907.64 V /L �/ EOF Inv=905 T I CBR LIMITS OF J, 914.50 )� G 1i Rim=919.12 I \ I �I \ CONSTRUCTION / 1. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE EXISTING UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG EXISTING PORTIONS OF FINALE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WHO MAY BE INVOLVED. RELOCATION, REMOVAL OR PROTECTION OF EXISTING UTILITIES MUST BE AGREED UPON AND COORDINATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. ACCESS TO KEYSTONE PLACE (ADJACENT PROPERTY) SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING UTILITY CONNECTIONS. COORDINATE PLAN WITH CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 4" OF RIGID INSULATION PER DETAILS ON ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPES WITH LESS THAN 8' OF COVER. RCWD UTILITY NOTES: 1. DEVELOPER MUST PROVIDE AN AS -BUILT SURVEY OF THE INVERT ELEVATIONS OF ALL CULVERTS EXTENDING INTO JD3 (DRAINAGE DITCH). 1.1. OS 61, FES 60 UTILITY LEGEND: CATCH BASIN MANHOLE ►� GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX 4- PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT WATER MAIN I SANITARY SEWER » STORM SEWER ZI FES AND RIP RAP .•:. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 15 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I i� A I I I I I I I I I I I I I I LIMITS OF I CONSTRUCTION I I II I I / WETLAND X �` LIMITS OF x CONSTRUCTION m r • ♦ _ � -4- INV= 915 ° MH V=im=921.s r 915.82 / � H � \ Rim=9 95 I I \ I I \ I I \ I I \ I \ CONSTRUCTION I- I I \� I LOW FLOOR=920.00 I LOW FLOOR=919.70 I / LOW FLOOR=918.00 LOW FLOOR=918_50\ (per{ot cart; verifyj� per o loteert, verify) cert; verify�OW FLOOR=919.00 / cert, verify) - LOW FLOOR=918.50 (per lot cart, verify) � (par tot, ) (per lot cert, verify) 1 � Know what's below. 1" = 80'-0" Call before you dig. 40-0" o Bo'-o" 0 0 0 (CAVR a A \ j (�E m o U LFD Civil Engineering ^ Surveying . Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 ii N N � Q O 0 � 0 o O I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION OVERALL UTILITY PLAN C400 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. I I I LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ! i I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I e of Woods------� j I I I I I I I I I I I I --Wire Fence I I WON �,01111�_ - I 90° BAND I I I I N r V! 10"Wo I Trr"j I - � I � M o VNECT TO I E STING 24" Dl�a o TERMAIN a 1 QE I ' I ' I ; ' \1WETLAND '4-6,.0-78 5P' / _ r -- \ L411 VC SAN. (TYP) 1" VC WAT. (TYP) I 1-7 - - II I it - - - - - - - - _ _ - > I I SAN @ 0.400 I I I 1 N I 1 I L - 1 �I - I j 114LF8" _j \ \ \ \ \ \ G 420 LF 8 Y \ V, 3 \V L-- t PVC SDR3 - \ \ \\ \ \\ \-------- I I I II ° \ \ F II I I 1) � Z \ \ � I I - � i 1)11.5° � \\ `\ \\\ \ \\ \\� �1! �\ r J I i I I I i t i l l __ ^ I� I III IE(NE)= .30if1351' I II IE(S)=90 7 LF 8"� 4" PVC SAN. (TYP) C SD \ 1" PVC, WkT TYPE \ \ I 1 I I � SAN \ \ � \/ / G`l� \ \ pJ \ V. 0 E=917. ` ��A \ _ >> (NE)=9 I I 94X24.X8 TEE ji \ W 9ON ECTION 7.\9 \ � % I BASIN 3 \\\`\ Z \\ \ \\ \ \ 22.50 BEND NWL-915.00 II �\ \ \ \\ \ 9 °\ , - AN MHO - - - - JNETLAND D2 F I I�'�L1 ',L=915.00 y\ eL'� \\ \ \ \ \ RE-915.70 I - - - - - - - - \ 3774 SF IWATI �&$AINWL=916A �\ \ \ i I WETLANDS I E=907.25 I ► l \ I 909 \ \ \ -"2 5° \ IE(W/ )=907.3� I 00 \\ 16,910 SF \ \ \ \ \ „ I L0 , I \ \ IP I - _� �v� i i 1909.17 \ \ WA ERM/�I 11 I LIMITS OF - 910.1- C®4�1STRLl,CTIOF QI \\ / ' 2� GV Y \ I I % \ i 1 1N'.96 w�� \ \ �(IVA � I N \ I I � ^ � �� li I L-- - -- _---- _ - - -- 2 �I I 2 `\ `� \ \\ \\, � % - � 14X24X8 TEES / , \ P, @� \\ \\\\r� � R35 i S H 8 `L P D \\` � � DR3 _ I I I SAN a@ 0.40% I 1 j _ - - 0° BEN I I I / s -> 1 5o 1.250 BEND RE 7.8 I Z WATERNI� N ) 909.00 __j w a 4 w �� J HYD & G �01°J4 AL TYP. _ - /-- III ��ili � P6SF �0 / 312 LIMITS OF ---� g---J L--_J V la CONSTRUCTION Rim IIP - SMH I =919.12 LIMITS( F/ i « 90° BEND / •• -< H,iD & / � GTYP. `V ` SAN M H 6A i lI• I , I i II I I I i i RE=916.50 11N- IE(N)=908.31 - --------- i • � \r \� � -AL IF I 4" PVC SAN. (TYP) I n \ II i 1 1 / � J t I t 1 PVC WAT. (TYP) I l Irb _ I� 1 V j WETLAND E / I \\ 1 67,678 SF i // V IF O Ii 1► 1� � �� IL I Al/ y I I 1 \ \ ��� / �� ;� �i� 1 1 ; LIMITS OF �, I I \ \ If I CONSTRUCTION BASIN 4 ��.� ��\� li NWL=913.00 1 1 1 O>TLET EL=9'`3.00 O1 \ I 1 OUTLET EOF=914.50 Qv 1 100-YR HWL=914.93 P SF� `\ 11 I \\�\ I LIMITS OF $3+21 It I 1 \ \ 1 CONSTRUCTION �I L - - - - - - - - - N89040'02"E 1320.77 EOF 19o7.7 IN - -`-'-' 914.50 LIMITS OF I y sozsa VIAI N I CONSTRUCTION \ CONSTRUCTION I I--- LIMITS OF I \'/ I 1 I CONSTRUCTION \ � „� ,� woo ON r. �69 91 1 r ''��•�__ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 900 BAND I r922.00HP - - - - - 9 .e7 � �9. SI \ \ r .�a- - /- N RE LIMITS OF J ET \ / wo I CO TION O D I _ � 92E.90 CONNECT TO I Z FBI E Water Tower EXISTING 24" DIPE o 5 GFE= WATERMAIN 92, 88 XX 8" PVC SAN ;\�E 1 ' ' ► ` I.56 SERVICE ; I �F ~' i 19.16 1 _ � I Drive I ' I -I , 6 919.33 \ - ---- I i p °�,�-- I EX SAN MH 46 -x- xx I' �x- -- - RIM \ SMH Ili Rim=9, .67 RE=919.70 J sM Inv=905.17 �I �2 IE(N/S)=905.33 EX 16" DIP I Rin WATERMAIN ►04 1 MN91 40 OSMH $ Rim=921.93 11.950 / \ I \ I � I \ I I � I \ � I \ �FE- EX 24" DIP \ 918. WATERMAIN TNH= 1926.69 I I CITY OF HUGO UTILITY NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE EXISTING UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG EXISTING PORTIONS OF FINALE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WHO MAY BE INVOLVED. RELOCATION, REMOVAL OR PROTECTION OF EXISTING UTILITIES MUST BE AGREED UPON AND COORDINATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. ACCESS TO KEYSTONE PLACE (ADJACENT PROPERTY) SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING UTILITY CONNECTIONS. COORDINATE PLAN WITH CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 4" OF RIGID INSULATION PER DETAILS ON ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPES WITH LESS THAN 8' OF COVER. RCWD UTILITY NOTES: 1. DEVELOPER MUST PROVIDE AN AS -BUILT SURVEY OF THE INVERT ELEVATIONS OF ALL CULVERTS EXTENDING INTO JD3 (DRAINAGE DITCH). 1.1. OS 61, FES 60 GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE -USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. 6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION. 10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN 5OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. 11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL. 14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. 15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 17. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE -DRILLED. 18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 25. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 26. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0. UTILITY LEGEND: CATCH BASIN MANHOLE N GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT I WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER >> STORM SEWER FES AND RIP RAP 0 ° N Know what's below. 1" = 50'-0" Call before you dig. 25o" 0 50' o" (C 0 \0\\ qo\e a m (K:D M Y, Civil Engineering ^ Surveying - Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 O N N L0 LO �I O >1 N V� z J N , O �>1 O Cl) 2 O CQ c� > a' 0 O O M (1) V v O O CO s I- U w O o_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION UTILITY PLAN (SAN WATER) C401 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. EX MCES MANHOLE #58 EX RE=916.37 EX. 42" IE (N/S)=898.14 EXISTING 179 LF 42" RCP PROP MCES MANHOLE MCES INTERCEPTOR @ 0.10% 916" PROP RE=917.00 I EX. 42" IE (N/S)=897.96 - -- PROP 36" IE (E)=898-36 EXISTING 316 LF 42" RCP -4-- MCES INTERCEPTOR @ 0.1ib% I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I EX MCES MANHOLE #5N EX RE=919.04 EX. 42" IE (N/S)=897.64 ; I I I m in 0 I 0 00 to I LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION ; I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF HUGO UTILITY NOTES: 25' D&U EASEMENT OBTAIN FROM NEIGHBORING PROPERTY 460 LF 36" PVC F679 SANITARY TRUNK SEWER @ 0.10% ------------ LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION =��mmmm � � �r Fmm���or����mm�� COR7R 0H SO� a mO M p Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 24x24x12 TEE PROP TRUNK MANHOLE B PROP RE=914.50 PROP 36" IE (E/W)=899.17 PROP TRUNK MANHOLE A PROP RE-916.50 350 LF 36" PVC F679 12" DIP 12" PL PROP 36" IE (E/W)=898.82 SANITARY TRUNK WATERMAIN 36"iPILUG ZI PROP 8" IE (S)=900.69 SEWER @ 0.10% - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ ---- - --- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION -.4.6Z. 1.6.Q. V�.J; > >> ------- 10 BG�/--ram- I- Z114 Li 94 LF 36" PVC F679 ' OX ------� \�- TY . 1 I I III / / J SAN MH 3 I O i 1A RE=915.5 �ANI Y TRUNK G� 5 I T / I III // / ti N IE SW =9 6.38 I�@ 0.10% B�.G I I i I I 2 I " PVi SAN. (TYP) ( ) �Ii L- - 146 LF 8" I I .1 ' P`G i AT. (TYP) a � - - - - - Oil, ' ���„r►-. - - - - D PVC SDR26 I I ty / / - - -7 (-Wool\ \.� 01 L `� �\ S / 142 F� 'j / // /� I �� _ PVC 26 / / 4 „ N _ W�TLAND D1 GJ \\\ \ _ •• G I I SAN .40% AN MH 2 / /1/99 LF - Qm _j I / LIMITS OF 105900 S�'� G� \ \ - ''I'` `3 So I _ / ♦ - - Ii CONSTRUCTION I rim w I � \ � � � � h13, , - - -j L � (NW)=9 2.92�� � �� �� 3 \ \ / �► I / \IE 3.02 ♦♦ N WETLAND H / I , 4 E / (� R / / % 1 1555SF / i 46#/ / 2.5° BE D /- / HYD GV, TYP. _ �� �� I* U) \\\ V I �� �► �/ - - _ - 00 (DITCHED) ��i� \ RE=9 .40 / %/ATER j & / \I �IE(N)=9 1.I a 50 END5 ]E(SE)=9 .36 S1 116 F 8" z ,' -HYDPVC SDR2 6 SAN MH 23U o, �0% " I - RE=918.20 `\ E YIE.(S)=908.58 11.25 / l ♦ / I ° BLO ------- SAN _ �6 " 9 I I 4- L ' II 03.48 I P^ � � • �--- I I � I I BASIN 1 `�� •• - -1 I IE(S)=Pd1 8 -_- - - - -_ -- _ - -- �d�IWL=914.59AIL� I IE(NE)� 95.58 - r -- // OUTLET EL=914.50 '�_� L----- - - - - -J 100-YR HWL=915.64 11.25` BEND ti I I 197LF8" \ 1 /• �'----- - PVC SDR351 AIL AIL II I oSAN @ 0.40b/o I �� WETLAND A I �, I I 63,656 SF IE Z co � - - - - _ - � � I I �` ` I I I � - I � --- _-- r 8------------ \ 22.50 B // J I I M SAN H 22 \ 8" DIP - -.may - - I , . - - ° REND 8 2 iA RMAIN SAN MH 20 !---- - \ \✓ RE=917.0i9ta,-�__ IE N-907.�- IE(SE)-9 7.69 �-�i � �\ \ � �,� IE(E)=905.08 - _,. �� Q ' � �� IE(SW)-_ 905.18 ,- - - - - -_-_- - - j'I'`' 267 LFFV PVC SDR35 336 LF 8" . • SAN @ 0.40% PVC, 35 -127 LF 8"- G 0.40% PVC SDR35 I ��- g� / V • 3 S �HY / SAN @ 0.40% , \ ]I�E- 18.00 / \ JE(N =9 . 2. / E(SW = .62 W I � / I1t9 LF/ I (zD � j I / BASIN 2 S \@ 0.40% NWL=914.50 / OUTLET EL=914.3b 1 100-YR HWL=915.54 ; 11 , 'i WETLAND F,' "%,.0-78$F,' ,,lk ,,lk i F- - - - ---- 4" VC< SAN. (TYP) I I 1. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE EXISTING UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG EXISTING PORTIONS OF FINALE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WHO MAY BE INVOLVED. RELOCATION, REMOVAL OR PROTECTION OF EXISTING UTILITIES MUST BE AGREED UPON AND COORDINATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. ACCESS TO KEYSTONE PLACE (ADJACENT PROPERTY) SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING UTILITY CONNECTIONS. COORDINATE PLAN WITH CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 4" OF RIGID INSULATION PER DETAILS ON ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPES WITH LESS THAN 8' OF COVER. °�� AN \A 8 DIP J I I I T MAIN UJ l� L � \\\1b a I 1 T L- \\\ I -- -- - - W/'FiEiFWI X8 8 T \\\ ip \\ \ \ \ I 1�V N 1 \�N CTI �\ \\ \\\Tm qrso 420 LF 8" K\ V, 3 \ \\ \\ \\ \\\\ ��?► / / / L - - - - PVC SDR350 - SAN @ 0.48/6 IL RCWD UTILITY NOTES: 1. DEVELOPER MUST PROVIDE AN AS -BUILT SURVEY OF THE INVERT ELEVATIONS OF ALL CULVERTS EXTENDING INTO JD3 (DRAINAGE DITCH). 1.1. OS 61, FES 60 - - -?s / // / 90° B ND N IF 2 24X8 TE 24 WATERMAIN NN � 8LF8' -� , d ; _ / [SCAN @ 0.4 ° 7♦ i 11 i i ��� ATE MAIN �p J ♦♦� / / / /� I / MH4 � ­7 ♦ i � ,� �I I RE 915. / / �� �- �41t -------------------- )=904.15j I i - - - -- DITCH 7 Edge of Water 143 L 8" VC DR35 SAN I J� • ' - v�� I I I • I I �t,� I AI�I I I l22 ' E=915.50 j I (N)=904.47 S/W)=904.57���; I I I I I I • I � I I I I I I �, LIMITS OF I CONSTRUCTION 4 4X8TEE I II CO ECTION % • i I i i BASIN 5 I I II J I I NWL=911.50 I i OUTLET EL=911.50 1 w I I I I 100-YR HWL=913.46 J w I I I , I, J I I I I I i 'I II HYD GV I I I 1 1 I Ty-P. I II Ile 1 / I UTILITY LEGEND: CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER 91 MANHOLE 0 FES AND RIP RAP n ►/ GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX no I 4- PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT p I WATER MAIN Know what's below. 1" = 50'-0" SANITARY SEWER Call before you dig. 25-0" 0 50'-0" ii I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION UTILITY PLAN I (SAN WATER) C402 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. I I I LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION I I I I I I I i I I I I I I - I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I e of Woods------� j I I I I I I I i i Wire Fence ■ - - 1.0-i I I ,am EM ♦ Im Edge of Woods ----- �'♦ -Wire Fence WETLAND X LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION WON a- om 100 r922.00HP - - - - loeo/ I ♦ LIMITS OF J / CO TION 4OPi OE ❑H FFE= / 921.90 E Water To i 19.16 ' 1 ` 91 .26 6 91 3 so _ D Oc 97A0W RIM - SMH Rim=919.67 `/ Inv-905.17 CBR Rkn-MG Inv-916. I I 919.69 90° BAND- --- 919.77 �- EX 8" PVC SAN SERVICE N ET Lu O M I +� rn I � . CONNECT TO I " EXISTING 24" DI�'a 5 WATERMAIN a I � I I I Drive I EX 16" DIP WATERMAIN EX 24" DIP - WATERMAI I I l -I li I I I I I I I I I I SM Rin LIIVII I J VI CONSTRUCTION CITY OF HUGO UTILITY NOTES: 1. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE EXISTING UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG EXISTING PORTIONS OF FINALE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WHO MAY BE INVOLVED. RELOCATION, REMOVAL OR PROTECTION OF EXISTING UTILITIES MUST BE AGREED UPON AND COORDINATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. ACCESS TO KEYSTONE PLACE (ADJACENT PROPERTY) SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING UTILITY CONNECTIONS. COORDINATE PLAN WITH CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 4" OF RIGID INSULATION PER DETAILS ON ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPES WITH LESS THAN 8' OF COVER. RCWD UTILITY NOTES: 1. DEVELOPER MUST PROVIDE AN AS -BUILT SURVEY OF THE INVERT ELEVATIONS OF ALL CULVERTS EXTENDING INTO JD3 (DRAINAGE DITCH). 1.1. OS 61, FES 60 LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION INV / 907.7 907.------� 907.64 910.1 GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. SEE SITE PLAN FOR HORIZONTAL DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM THE PLANS. 4. UTILITY INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM TO THE CURRENT EDITION OF "STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION" AND "SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION" AS PREPARED BY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND SHALL CONFORM WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY AND THE PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS. 5. CASTINGS SHALL BE SALVAGED FROM STRUCTURE REMOVALS AND RE -USED OR PLACED AT THE DIRECTION OF THE OWNER. 6. ALL WATER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP) AWWA C151, ASME B16.4, AWWA C110, AWWA C153 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7. ALL SANITARY SEWER SHALL BE SDR 26 POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) ASTM D3034 & F679, OR SCH 40 ASTM D1785, 2665, ASTM F794, 1866) UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8. ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE HDPE ASTM F714 & F2306 WITH ASTM D3212 SPEC FITTINGS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 9. PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE FROM CENTER TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE OR TO END OF FLARED END SECTION. 10. UTILITIES ON THE PLAN ARE SHOWN TO WITHIN S OF THE BUILDING FOOTPRINT. THE CONTRACTOR IS ULTIMATELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE FINAL CONNECTION TO BUILDING LINES. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL AND MECHANICAL PLANS. 11. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.15 FEET PER DETAILS. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON THIS PLAN DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 12. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 13. HYDRANT TYPE, VALVE, AND CONNECTION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY REQUIREMENTS. HYDRANT EXTENSIONS ARE INCIDENTAL. 14. A MINIMUM OF 8 FEET OF COVER IS REQUIRED OVER ALL WATERMAIN, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM OF 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. EXTRA DEPTH WATERMAIN IS INCIDENTAL. 15. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITIES, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 16. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH CITY STANDARDS AND COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 17. CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES SHALL BE CORE -DRILLED. 18. COORDINATE LOCATIONS AND SIZES OF SERVICE CONNECTIONS WITH THE MECHANICAL DRAWINGS. 19. COORDINATE INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING OF THE INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES WITH ADJACENT CONTRACTORS AND CITY STAFF. 20. ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL PAVEMENT CONNECTIONS SHALL BE SAWCUT. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROLS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS, AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT APPROVAL BY THE CITY. 21. ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, SHALL BE ADJUSTED TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE REQUIRED. THE REQUIREMENTS OF ALL OWNERS MUST BE COMPLIED WITH. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS MUST MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 22. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE ALL WORK WITH PRIVATE UTILITY COMPANIES. 23. CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE CONNECTION OF IRRIGATION SERVICE TO UTILITIES. COORDINATE THE INSTALLATION OF IRRIGATION SLEEVES NECESSARY AS TO NOT IMPACT INSTALLATION OF UTILITIES. 24. CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN AS -BUILT PLANS THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION AND SUBMIT THESE PLANS TO ENGINEER UPON COMPLETION OF WORK. 25. ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT. APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, OR OTHER STRUCTURES. 26. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN RULES, CHAPTER 4714, SECTION 1109.0. 27. FOR ALL SITES LOCATED IN CLAY SOIL AREAS, DRAIN TILE MUST BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS 50' IN EACH DIRECTION. SEE PLAN AND DETAIL. INSTALL LOW POINT DRAIN TILE PER PLANS AND GEOTECHNICAL REPORT RECOMMENDATIONS AND REQUIREMENTS. UTILITY LEGEND: CATCH BASIN MANHOLE ►� GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT I WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER or FES AND RIP RAP z O� Know what's below. Call before you dig. Ag�l 1 " = 50'-0" 25-0" 0 50'-0" COR7 R 0H SO� a mO M p Civil Engineering - Surveying - Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 O N N � L0 u7 E O _N Z N _0 o J O CD O 2 � N � � Q O O 0 1� � O O s CO FM U W O 0-I IL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION UTILITY PLAN (STORM) C403 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP IN ------- - - -L-- I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF HUGO UTILITY NOTES: CB35 IRE=916.27- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------LIMITsoFaE=913.48 I� CONSTRUCTION I 2 I I WETLAND D� \ 'l` 10,900 Ste: -o 00 N C N I, U) (0 LNz 6 Ln a� C o^ o M)M I oov I ozC I � o v E I I w I 1I S5 I I I 29LF12"R T- -ice I =� o I . -' M o CO Ez C U L I U I uE I � w E 0) I ti a) I fo I ; W - - I 1 I �1 I t 1 >� loo, i / I� \ I I � • I I I I AIL BASIN 2 i NWL=914.50 \ / OUTLET EL=914.n 1100-YR HWL=915.54 I I iWETLAND F, �46,.0-78-$P F 1. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE THE EXISTING UTILITY INFRASTRUCTURE ALONG EXISTING PORTIONS OF FINALE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES WHO MAY BE INVOLVED. RELOCATION, REMOVAL OR PROTECTION OF EXISTING UTILITIES MUST BE AGREED UPON AND COORDINATED PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 2. ACCESS TO KEYSTONE PLACE (ADJACENT PROPERTY) SHALL BE MAINTAINED DURING UTILITY CONNECTIONS. COORDINATE PLAN WITH CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. 3. CONTRACTOR TO INSTALL 4" OF RIGID INSULATION PER DETAILS ON ALL SANITARY SEWER PIPES WITH LESS THAN 8' OF COVER. 1 F1 P 0 (CR7H0SRO�e a M O M p Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 28 LF 12" RCP STORM @ 0.50% 28 LF 15" RCP STORM @ 0.50% STMH31 3221LF 12" RCP CBMH34 STORM @ 0.25% CBMH33 CBMH32 RE=913.50 I 27 RE=914.85 R---- 84----------------------- -I€Z-1a-5�----------------------------------------�- ------- --- -R-al-3- ------------------- - - � IE=912.54 - IE=912.40 LIMITS OF SUMP IE=907.55 CONSTRUCTION � 1.6 ^ all Am 1 "R ' Wft 171 L 15" RCP STORM @ 0.50% 1 ' N STORM @ 0.5006 FES30 - ' IE=911.50all ; \ .• 001* N i40 4� LIMITS OF - ---.u..- _ ` ♦ / - - - - ' ♦ CONSTRUCTION ♦♦ ♦♦♦ / , ♦♦ I N WETLAND H ♦ " 1555SF �� ♦!�� (DITCHED) � �i 41/ CB52 CBMH51Al I E=913.7 RE=917.02 °9 ' • ' I / i / I E=913.58 , 11��d� ` � / • • I I N ♦� ' // // IE SUMP=909.59 �• I I O ♦♦/ / ; "�,/ BASIN 1 `. `. I I / ��� /i ,� / 416)/ / F 50 \ OUTLET EL=914.50- / \E- 13.5R 100-YR HWL=915.64 , . - - - - -COO i = I 4.94 - _',_-_--Edge of Water DITCH 7 III I I / I E SW/E= 11.69 1 ^ 28 LF 5�� - - RCP I I - _ _ WETLAND A / I II I E S= 11.8 OR @ 0.500 --_------------------ I I I' 63,656 SF / �� �� - ) CBM I I FES20 I 16 LF 12" RCPI \,,,& 32 LF 15" RCP TORM @ 0.50_ o I IE- 1. I /� STORM @ 0.50o / I I i 9 0 50 I I 128 LF 15" RCP I ^ - 1 .55 I I I I I I I \ �" PERFORATE / _ STORM @ 2.07°/q' CBMH24 23 F 18" RCPRE A \\ PVC DRAT TI . ` / ` ` / - - ��� I IE-911.85 I ST R 50% i I i i I I 1 �TYP. `� I I ram- 5'- /`�. - - �ES25 ILZ \ #X FES60 �/�� �- Ham•- "'� 146 LF 18" RCP IE=91�00 / >� I �TORM @ 0.50% 79 LF 1�" RCP LIMITS OF ° / / milliner 111111111 miss ' 1 I I I I CONSTRUCTION STORM 0.63 /o i ��� TMH21 � I I I I I I I Q�MH 71 72 LF 12" RCP R=916.00 R=917.07 �►�' STORM @ 0.50% ^ IE=911.23 I I I I I I I I E=9� 4.08 SUMP I�10.08 I 907.23 _ i J \ FES70 J \ I j 1 1 BASIN 5 I B2 A ,I I I NWL=911.50 I E=914.00 -- -- I = 5.29 I I OUTLET EL=911.50 I I I I 1 / LU IE=91 I I I 100-YR HWL=913.46 J /t� j I I I I I 1 1 w _ �2n P \ � STO a@ 0 % � 6 L 12" CP OR 0. 60, \ 5 917. 0 \ I 9 4. \ 3 \ \ 2 \ \ �1 \ \ \ -,.40PN RCWD UTILITY NOTES: 1. DEVELOPER MUST PROVIDE AN AS -BUILT SURVEY OF THE INVERT ELEVATIONS OF ALL CULVERTS EXTENDING INTO JD3 (DRAINAGE DITCH). 1.1. OS 61, FES 60 1 Mo a -- --� II II 1 _ \ IL I I II \ TM II II i I I V I I I 1 II J, STM H 11 j I I RE=913.50 r I I E=909.89- - A I I i SUMP IE=905.89 I I I 1 li - �O DRATNv /� I I I 1 I '1 11 UTILITY LEGEND: CATCH BASIN MANHOLE ►� GATE VALVE AND VALVE BOX 4- PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT I WATER MAIN SANITARY SEWER >> STORM SEWER or FES AND RIP RAP no 0 �p0 a Know what's below. Call before you dig. O N N T i i L0 E O a) V � Z 2 LD 0 o J cD O 0' 2 O � � Q 0 0 O 0 o 0 s c0 FM 0 W 0 0-I li I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION UTILITY PLAN I (STORM) C404 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP IN INSET 8 I 15' �&Uuhb&i.UI ILK SOD OR SEED (AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER) W14" MIN TOPSOIL RAN 30' 16' SEE INSET A SEE INSET B NOTE: 1, CONSTRUCT FINAL LIFT OF BITUMINOUS ONE FREEZE -THAW CYCLE AFTER COMPLETION OF THE UTILITY WORK. 2, THE USE AND THICKNESS OF SELECT GRANULAR BORROW IS BASED ON EXISTING SOIL CONDITIONS AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTH TO BE DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER. 4, 4" PERFORATED P.E. PIPE WITH FABRIC. INSTALL WHERE CLAY SOILS ARE ENCOUNTERED IN THE ROADWAY SUBGRADE OR AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. SEE HU-SD-9 FOR DRAIN DETAIL- 300 OR SEED (AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER) W/4" MIN TOPSOIL MINIMUM PAVEMENT DESIGN STANDARD- ACTUAL PAVEMENT DESIGN SHALL BE BASED ON SUBGRADE SOIL R VALUE AND PROJECTED ESAL (TRAFFIC) GEOTECH REPORT RECOMMENDS: 4" BITUMINOUS 12" CLASS 5 18" GRANULAR BASE 112" TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MIXTURF (2,C) 7WEA240C (PG 58-28). MnDOT 2360 157 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT I12" TYPE SP 12.5 BITUMINOUS NON -WEARING COURSE MIXTURE (2,C) '1NEB230C (PG58-28], MnOOT2360 AGGREGATE BASE (CLASS 5 OR SALVAGEDJRECYGLED MATERIAL MEETING CLASS 5 RADATION), MnDOT 3138 I" SELECT GRANULAR BORROW, MnDOT 3149 2" APPROVED SUBGRADE INSET A LHUGO Y C)F EST. IB08 URBAN RESIDENTIAL STREET 9 TON DESIGN W R!W 46' TO B1C f \ 49 J A f \ 34'R d7RBiC P,C- OF ❑ = 46' 02' 06' CURB 3F M€ N 34' B-8 13' MIN. 13' 64' RAN RESIDENTIAL ADT 300-1000 CITY CIF 1UG0 EST. 1806 UNTAB LE OR 9618 C&G Special Details Date 04-01-15 H U-STR-5 03-12-20 i 5F' OAnr 46 TD _'z BIC � 4� 44' f \ 0 44 f CO i 34' Ri A 4' R\ L-- — B!C Rc- OF ❑ = 49° 02' 05" CURB 2F MIN. TYPICAL CUL-DE-SAC FOR 50' & 60' RIGHT-OF-WAYS THIS OCCURS ONLY WHERE MULCH MEETS EDGE OF WALK LEAVE TOP OF MULCH DOWN 1" FROM TOP OF WALK co / FINISHED f3RADE �1 e Y n e G a 5' 39' B-B1 MIN. 160'�R/j RESIDENTIAL ADT UNDER 300 Special Details 4a[z 04-01-15 03.12-20 TOOLED CONTROL JOINT SEE DETAIL (TYP.) LIGHT BROOM FINISH PERPENDICULAR TO TRAFFIC WITH 3" WIDE SMOOTH TROWELLED EDGE 6" CONCRETE AS SPECIFIED 6" CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE COMPACTED SUBGRADE NOTES: 1. INSTALLATION SHALL BE CERTIFIED AND IN ACCORDANCE TO AN ON -SITE A.C.I. TECHNICIAN AS SPECIFIED. 2. SEE GEO-TECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS FOR GROSS WEIGHT REQUIREMENTS. 3. SEE LAYOUT DRAWINGS FOR LIMITS OF WALKS. 4. SEE CONCRETE JOINT DETAIL FOR REQUIREMENTS. 5. 1l2" WIDE EXPANSION JOINT AND SEALANT AT ALL CURBS. MIN. 10.0' TO MkX 24.0' CONTRACTION JOINT (SAWED OR PREFORMED ON WIDTHS 16' OR GREATER) CONTRACTION JOINT (SAWED OR PREFORMED) BACK OF CURB EXPANSION JOINT 6'CONCRETE PAVEMENT(3F52A) CONCRETE CURB $ GUTTER SLOPE VA.RIE5 DRIVEV+IAY ...- . CROSS SLOPE WHEN SIDEWALK! TRAIL CROSSES DRIVEWAY Y" PER FOOT �2'MIN- 314"LIP * - a' 6" CLASS 5 OR STREET PATCH 2' BY LENGTH OF CURBING SALVAGEDlRECYCLED REMOVED AND REPLACED (MATCH EXISTING MATERIAL MEETING CLASS 5 CONTRACTION JOINT SIDEWALK THICKNESS) GRADATION (MnDOT3138) GROSSING ONLY SAWED OR PREFORMED NOTES: 1, WHERE EXISTING CURB OR CURB & GUTTER SECTIONS ARE REMOVED TO FACILITATE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW DRIVEWAY OR NEW DRIVEWAY OPENING, SAID SECTIONS SHALL BE REMOVED TO THE NEAREST JOINT, WHERE SAID NEAREST JOINT IS MORE THEN T BEYOND THE PROJECTED EDGE OF THE PROPOSED DRIVEWAY CONSTRUCTION, A GLEAN SAW -CUT WILL BE PERMITTED AND THE NEW SECTIONS POURED. 2. WHERE EXISTING SIDEWALK SECTIONS OR BITUMINOUS TRAIL ARE REMOVED TO FACILITATE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW DRIVEWAY OR NEW DRIVEWAY OPENING, SIDEWALK SECTIONS SHALL BE REMOVED TO THE NEAREST JOINT. BITUMINOUS TRAILS SHALL BE SAW CUT AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. SIDEWALK SECTIONS AND BITUMINOUS TRAILS SHALL EXTEND THROUGH THE DRIVEWAY UNLESS THE CITY ENGINEER APPROVES IN WRITING SOMETHING DIFFERENT. EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED AT EXISTING SIDEWALK MATCH POINTS- 3. WHERE EXISTING CURB OR CURB & GUTTER SECTIONS ARE REMOVED TO FACILITATE CONSTRUCTION OF A NEW DRIVEWAY OR NEW DRIVEWAY OPENING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SAW CUTTHE srrumiNDUS ROADWAY, RECOMPACT THE AGGREGATE BASE, AND TACK ALL EDGES AS APPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 4. DRIVEWAYS ON STREET RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS THAT DO NOT HAVE A HARD SURFACE APRON VVITH IN THE RIGHT OF WAY SHALL RECEIVE A BITUMINOUS APRON EXTENDING 5' FROM THE BACK OF CURB OR 6' FROM THE PAVEMENT EDGE WHEN CURBING IS NOT PRESENT, OR AS DIRECTED BY THE CITY ENGINEER. 5. NO DRIVEWAY ENTRANCE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITHIN 40' OF A STREET INTERSECTION END RADIUS UNLESS WRITTEN APPROVAL IS GIVEN BY THE CITY ENGINEER. CITY OF 1UG0 EST. 1908 RESIDENTIAL CONCRETE DRIVEWAY DETAIL Special Details nip 04-01-15 H U-STR-13 03-12-20 SF32" 31F" 15132" 27-5132" 26-202" 7-3116" 7-3116" _ i � 3" 1-7l1 1-1l4" 1-172" 5" MAX ...... a —ERS NOTE: 1- CASTING TO BE USED ON SURMOUNTABLE CURB ONLY. STORM STRUCTURES WITHIN DRIVEWAYS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. EST. 130E DRIVE OVER CASTING NEENAH 3501-TB ( BI-DIRECTIONAL) OR EQUIVALENT Special Details D.W: 04-01-15 H U-STR-7 03-12-20 O O O Civil Engineering " Surveying " Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 O N N T � LO C a) t0' V\ z LD o J O CD p = te++ AA W Z3 E: Q O O Ar W 0 �11 � O O s H U W O Of IL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL DETAILS 1 CONCRETE WALK/PAD C500 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP IN L 12" Bc/4 but not less than 6" L Bc/4 but not less than 6" IIi1III Compacted Backfill Bc III 0 513 - 2000# Concrete ++�'- - - LOAD FACTOR 2.3 "Bc" Denotes outside CLASS A Bc+12" Min. diameter of pipe Concrete Backfill to 0.5 of outside diameter with shaped bedding. III I' Compacted Backfill B c I11 - + + + + + + + + II- + + + 0+ + INI + II Course Filter Aggregate -I ++++++++++ ++-IIIII- MnDOT Spec. 3149H Mod, 11-1I-1I-1I-1I-1I I- I- LOAD FACTOR 1.9 Bc+12" Min. Bc" Denotes outside CLASS B diameter of pipe Hand shaped from angular bedding material Ilillll Bc - Compacted Backfill 1111- LOAD FACTOR 1.5 0.513cl "Be" Denotes outside CLASS C-1 Bc+12" Min. diameter of pipe Hand shaped from firm undisturbed soil Bc'zF1 I III Compacted Backfill c + + + Il ill Course Filter Aggregate MnDOT Spec. 3149H Mod, 1I1=1I1=1I1=1I1=1I1= I- LOAD FACTOR 1.5 "Bc" Denotes outside CLASS C 2 Bc+12" Min. diameter of pipe Hand shaped from angular bedding material PIPE BEDDING - RCP & DIP NTS 12" + -1= + + + + + + + + + + + + + +=1- + + + + + + + + + + + + + V Compacted - Backfill Min. Bc+12 "Be" Denotes outside 111- diameter of pipe Compacted Backfill Granular Borrow (MnDOT Spec. 3149A modified) PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN GOOD SOILS =1 + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + 12" =1 + + + + + + + + + + + + I- Bedding =1 + + + + + + Bc + + + + + + I- + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + e =1 .d Foundation ��a�le/ 11-1 I CI I I-1 I I-1 I C 1- Course Filter "Bc" Denotes outside Minimum Agg. (MnDot Spec. diameter of pipe 3149H Modified) 2d+Bc+12" PIPE FOUNDATION & BEDDING IN POOR SOILS PIPE BEDDING - PVC NTS OUTLET NOZZLES & THREADS: TWO 2-1/2'HOSE CONNECTION AND ONE 4-112" PUMPER CONNECTION. (NATIONAL STANDARD THREADS) V CAPS TO BE CHAINED (PENTAGON NUT ON CAPS) VALVE BOX AS SPECIFIED STREET VARIES I ►h�rrr�s:�i+�►a:ai "HYARAFINDER" (CANDYCANE) FIRE HYDRANTI-OCATOR WATEROUS WE-250 AS SPECIFIED BURY 8.0' GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MnDOT 3733 TYPE 3 1" WAS HED COARSE GRAVEL OR CRUSHER ROCK 70 6" ABOVE WASTE OPENING MIN. 113 CY BRACINGAS f REQUIRED PRECAST CONCRETE BLOCK 8" X 8" X 16' y PRECAST CONCRETE BAST_ AS SPECIFIED T DIAMETER BY 3' DEEP PIT UNDER HYDRANT FILLED WITH GRAVEL FOR ALL INSTALLATIONS. NOTES: 1- HYDRANT COATINGS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED AFTER THE BASE COURSE OF BITUMINOUS IS INSTALLED- PRIME AND PAINT HYDRANTS PER AWWA AND MANUFACTURER'S STANDARDS. 2. ALL HYDRANT LEADS SHALL BE TIED WITH 34' TIE RODS. TIE ROD SHALL EXTEND FROM TEE TO VALVE AND VALVE TO HYDRANT MEGA LUGS MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF TIED RODS. 3. HYDRANTS SHALL HAVE A 16' BREAK OFF TRAP FIC FLANGE T 4, ALL RODS AND RETAINERS 70 BE COATED WITH BITUMAS IC- 5. RED OR YELLOW "OUT OF ORDER" TAG TO BE INSTALLED ON THE PUMPER CONNECTIONS AFTER BACKFILL 6. THE INITIAL & FINAL RAISING OF VALVE BOXES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT, 7. ALL WATERMAIN BOLTS SHALL BE STAINLESS OR CDR -SLUE OR APPROVED EQUAL i&RST. F Special Details TYPICAL HYrRANT 04-01-15 INSTALLATION HU-W-1 Rameu: 1 006 03-12.20 EACH AREA �.. 114" PLYWOOD OVER FACE IS V2 OF , + TABULATED . OF BOLTS - TOTALAREA PLUG OR CAP PLUGGED CROSS WYE BEND PLUGGED CROSS PLUGGED TEE NOMINAL F1TCSIZE, IN INCHES TEE, WYE, PLUG OR CAP 90' BEND, PLUGGED CROSS TEE PLUGGED ON RUN 45° BEND 22-112' BENT) 11-114' BEND Al A2 4 1.0 1A 1.9 1A 1.0 - 6 2.1 3.0 4.3 3.0 1.6 1.0 8 3-8 5.3 7-6 5.4 2-9 1.5 1.0 10 5.9 8A 11A 8A 4.6 2.6 1-2 12 8.5 12.0 17.0 12.0 6.6 3.4 1.7 14 11.5 16.3 23.0 16.3 8.9 4.6 2.3 16 15.0 21.3 30.0 21.3 11.8 6.0 3.0 18 19.0 27.0 38.0 27.0 14.6 7.8 3.8 20 23.5 33.3 47.0 33.3 18.1 9.4 4.7 24 34-0 48.0 68.0 46_0 26.2 13.6 6.8 NOTES: 1. CONCRETE THRUST BLOCKING TO BE POURED AGAINST UNDISTURBED EARTH. 2. KEEP CONCRETE CLEAR OF JOINT ANG ACCESSORIES. 3. REQUIRED BEARING AREAS AT FITTING SHALL BE AS NOTED ABOVE, UNLESS INDICATED OTHERWISE. 4- BEARING AREAS AND SPECIAL BLOCKING DETAILS SHOWN ON THE PLANS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER BEARING AREAS AND BLOCKING DETAILS SHOWN ON THIS STANDARD PLATE. 5, ABOVE BEARING AREAS BASED ON TEST PRESSURES OF 150 PSI AND AN ALLOWABLE SOIL BEARING STRESS OF 2000 LBS. PER SQUARE FOOT. TO COMPUTE BEARING AREAS FOR DIFFERENT TEST PRESSURES AND SOIL BEARING STRESSES, USE THE FOLLOWING EQUATION: BEARING AREA = (TEST PRESSURE1150) X (20001SOIL BEARING STRESS) X (TABLE VALUE). �. CITY CJF Special Details POURED CONCRETE THRUST 04.01-15 GO BLOCKING FOR WATERMAIN HU-W-4 Rem EST, 1909 03 12-20 VALVE BOX SETTING TO BE IW-318" BELOW PAVEMENT AND AT GRADE IN TURF AREAS VALVE BOX SHALL BE SET TO HAVE 6" ADJUSTMENT UP AND DOWN FROM FINISH GRADE VALVE SOX TYLER 6860 SERIES AGGREGATE AND MnDOT 3733 TYPE - 3 GEOTEXFILE FABRIC LINING DRAIN PIT AND ATTACHED TO TOP OF VALVE BOX FOOT PIECE D.I.P- WATERMAIN GATE VALVE ADAPTOR: 114" STEEL WITH PROTECTIVE COATING 314" RU$BER GASKET INSTALLED BETWEEN GATE VALVE AND ADAPTOR TOP VIEW r SIDE VIE'V,' 4 ■ LID SHALL BE LABELED IN RAISED LETTERS "WATER" I T-6" COVER MIN, BASE ADAPTOR ADAPTOR, INC TIE RODS GATE VALVE 8"X13"x5" MANHOLE BLOCK 1" WASHED COARSE GRAVEL OR CRUSHED ROCK TO 6" ABOVE NOTES WASTE OPENING MIN. 3 CY 1. GATE VALVES SHOULD BE USED ON 8" THROUGH 16" WATERMAIN. 2. VALVE BOX INSERTS ARE NOT ALLOWED UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 3. VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED PLUMB AND SHALL ALLOW A 4' P.V.C. PIPE TO PASS ENTIRELY OVER THE GATE VALVE NUT AFTER INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE. 4, ALL VALVES SHALL BE TIED WITH 314" THREADED TIE RODS TO THE MAIN. MEGA LUGS MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF TIE RODS, 5. THE INITIAL & FINAL RAISING OF VALVE BOXES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT. 6. BOXES SHALL BE WATEROUS SERIES 2500 OR APPROVED EQUAL- METAL SEATED GAVE VALVES ARE NOT NO SCALE ALLOWED. Special Details I�CITTY C]F VALVE BOX "e`�- i 04-fli-15 INSTALLATION ReHU-W-3 .ssea EST. 1906 03-12-20 STEEL POST PAINTED BLUE VARIES- DRAINAGE EASEMENT VARIES- DRAINAGE EASEMENT ue w z CL STREET L AS REQUIRED AS REQUIRED o Iz myzm 2' SLACK INTRUDER WIRE AT GROUND LEVEL 7'-B' MIN COVER CURB BOX WITH V-114" STANDPIPE AND STATIONARY ROD (8'-6" AT FULL EXTENSION) 1" CORP STOP FORD F8600 TRACER WIRE 1"TYPE K COPPER I' TYPE K COPPER OR POLYETHYLENE SDR 7 OR POLYETHYLENE SDR 7 WATERMAIN HORIZONTAL GOOSENECK CURB STOP FORD B22 SERIES LOOP SHALL BE NO HIGHER THAN WATERMAIN 8" xI3'x5" MANHOLE BLOCK 6" xIWx5" MANHOLE BLOCK NOTES: 1- CURB BOXES INSTALLED IN AREAS WHERE BOULEVARD IS TO BE CUT AT A LATER DATE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT DEPTH REQUIRED, CURB SOX EXTENSION FOR BOXES EXCEEDING 7.5' IN LENGTH ARE TO BE BID AT CONTRACT PRICE AND SHALL INCLUDE STACK COUPLINGS, CONNECTIONS, ETC.. 2. CURB BOXES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS OR PARKING LOTS SHALL UTILIZE THE FORD MINNEAPOLIS PATTERN CURB BOXES A-1 OR CITY APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 3. CORP. STOPS SHALL BE FORD BALLCORP F8600-4 AND CURB STOPS SHALL BE FORD BALL VALVE 1322- 44M OR CITY APPROVED EQUIVALENT_ 4. WHERE SIDEWALK OR TRAILS ARE PLACED 1' FROM RIGHT OF WAY WATER SERVICES SHALL BE EXTENDED 10' BEYON❑ THE RIGHT OF WAY, 5. WHEN THERMOPLASTIC SERVICE IS INSTALLED, CURB BOX LID AND CORPORATION STOP SHALL HAVE OPTIONAL TRACER WIRE CONNECTION. 6. SADDLES REQUIRED ON 6" DIP OR SMALLER MAINS. MUELLER H-10528 OR APPROVED EQUAL . STANDARD NEENAH 7" R-1642 FRAME WITH TYPE B SELF SEALING LID WITH TWO INSTALL EXTERNAL MANHOLE CONCEALED PICK HOLES. CHIMNEY SEAL MANUFACTURED BY SHALL BE LABELED "SANITARY INFI-SHIELD GATOR WRAP OR SEWER" APPROVED EQUAL SANITARY SEWER PIPE POLYETHYLENE (PE) MANHOLE ADJUSTING RINGS, ADJUSTING RINGS MIN 4"-MAX 12' DEPTH (FT) TYPE USE THICKER ADJUSTING RINGS WHEN FEASIBLE TO MINIMIZE NUMBER OF RINGS. SHIMMING ADJUSTING 0-14 SOR 35 RINGS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 27 " DIA : >14 SDR 20 ALL MANHOLES WITH INSIDE DROP SECTION L SHALL BE 5' DIA (I.D.) MANHOLEASTM C-4 8 CLASS 1 t 48" ❑IA J USE R-2 TYPE CONFINED LU ¢ O-RING GASTING JOINT FOR q ALL MANHOLE JOINTS ¢ a z CORE DRILL INTO it EXISTING MANHOLE a 8' 0 8' "CRE-SEAL". "RESEAL`, OR INFISHIELD GATOR WRAP APPROVED EQUAL PRECAST STEPS AT i OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT GASKET CONNECTION SHALL BE 16" O_C. ! FOR ALL MANHOLE JOINTS USED FOR CONNECTING PIPE TO MANHOLE i• PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION " ' 6" MIN. WITH INVERT , .�..^,.,;•r f VARIABLE #5 AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY NOTES: 1. MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS-8-PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" O.C. LOCATE ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF MANHOLE- 2- STEPS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT THE OFFSET VERTICAL PORTION OF THE CONE IS FACING DOWN STREAM- 3. WHEN MANHOLE JOINTS OCCUR BELOW THE WATER TABLE THEY SHALL BE SEAL WRAPPED AS DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATION (INCIDENTAL). 4. THE INITIAL AND FINAL RAISING OF CASTINGS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL. 5. BLOCK STRUCTURES WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 6. INVERT AND DOGHOUSE COATING SHALL 8E STRONG -SEAL ®Q5R OR APPROVED EQUAL. 7- MARKING POST SHALL BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT ALL MANHOLES LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE STREET SECTION. 8- SERVICES SHALL NOT ENTER THE MANHOLES UNLESSAPPROVED BY THE CITY ENGINEER- Special retails 6MEST 01906 STANDARD MANHOLE ��04.01-15 (48" DIAMATER) SANITARY SEWER HU-SS-1 03-12-2020 (CRO7H0 SRO�e a M O M p Civil Engineering - Surveying - Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 O N N T L0 LO C E a� '0 V � Z J 0 LD 0 c� O W � Q 0 0 0 C- V O 0 s FM H U w 0 0-I IL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL DETAILS C501 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. z J a rr = L d � z o O H J Cr D L z o L L o L _ > z W a DIA + 3' BACKFILL MATERIAL NOTES: 1. EXTERNAL SEAL SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THE FRAME FINISH GRADE AND CONCRETE TOP SLAB AS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. I - FINE SAND (FA7) r MIN. 2' WIDE BY 4" THICK ! INSULATION BOARD (USE 2-2" THICK BOARDS). MASTIC ALL JOINTS EXTEND INSULATION BOARD DOWN SIDES TO 7.5' DEPTH. PIPE BEDDING UTILITY PIPE MATERIAL V-6" (MIN) NOTES: 1. INSULATION BOARD TO BE CLOSED CELL. EXTRUDED POLYSTYRENE FOAM MEETING ASTM 578, TYPE VI, 40PSI COMPRESSING STRENGTH (ASTM D1621) 0.1%MAX. WATER ABSORPTION (ASTM C272). 2. BACKFILL MATERIAL AROUND INSULATION MUST BE FINE SAND FREE FROM ROOT, ORGANIC MATERIAL, OR OTHER INJURIOUS MATERIALS. 3. OVERLAP ALL INSULATION BOARD JOINTS. UTILITY PIPE INSULATION DETAIL N T S HOT -DIPPED GALVANIZED GRATE IN TWO SECTIONS 6 CUBIC YARDS CLASS-3 RIP -RAP INV 914.00 ASTM C-478 INV TOP - PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE SECTION WEIR WALL 913.50 INV NOTCH / NWL - =911.50 WEIR WALL - 71 U6 ?" LONG NOTCH NEIR in baffle wall © 12" rizontal t©12" .�rtical A WALL INV.=913.50 " .D " WALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE CLASS II PRECAST PIPE, 0.1.11 MNDOT STANDARD PLATE NO. 3000L TOP 18" ORIFICE = 910.50 18" ORIFICE INV.=909.00 BALL DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED ON INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. ALL GROUTING SHALL BE WITH MONOLITHIC BOTTOM NON -SHRINKING CEMENT. INV.=909.00 ;�CL-5 AGGREGATE INV. STRUCTURE=909.00 AS DIRECTED I.D. D. W BY ENGINEER NOTES: 1. NO STRUCTURE SHALL BE ORDERED UNTIL ENGINEER APPROVES SHOP DRAWINGS. 2. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CLEANING POND � MNDOT STANDARD PLATE NO. 3000L OUTLET SKIMMER PRIOR TO FINAL ACCEPTANCE. *•• MNDOT STANDARD PLATE NO. 4011E 3. PLACE GEOTEXTILE BLANKET UNDER ALL RIPRAP. OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE N T S A L CENTER STRUCTURE TO BACK OF CURB CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH NO. R-3067V, INSTALL INFI-SHIELD - GATOR WRAP EXTERNAL MANHOLE CHIMNEY SEAL OR APPROVED EQUAL. EXTERNAL SEAL SJ4ALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING TO MANUFACTURE'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 5. PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION WITH POURED INVERT #5 AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY 3t• 24• ,III L[I I� PLAN FLOW LINE SHALL BE MIN, 12" 0.7' BELOW TOP OF CURB 6" POLYEHTYLENE (PE) ADJUSTING RINGS (MIN 4"- MAX 12"), USE THICKER ADJUSTING RINGS WHEN FEASIBLE TO MINIMIZE NUMBER 24" OF RINGS. �x. SHIMMING OF ADJUSTING RINGS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED, VOIDSFILLED WITH CONCRETE BRICK OR BLOCK ONLY 6' PRECAST BASE SECTION A -A NOTES: 1. REINFORCING TO CONSIST OF #R4 BARS @ 8" O.C. BOTH WAYS 2. GROUT BOTTOM TO DRAIN TO CENTER 3. CORE DRILL INTO EXISTING MANHOLE 4. APPROVED INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL WEAR COURSE IS PAVED S. DRAIN TILE TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS (50' IN EACH DIRECTION WITH CLEAN OUT). SEE DETAIL HU-SD$ FOR DRAINTILE CONNECTION INTO STRUCTURE AND HU-SS-3 FOR CLEAN OUT CONSTRUCTION. 6. INVERT AND DOGHOUSE COATING SHALL BE STRONG -SEAL &QSR, OR APPROVED EQUAL NO SCALE 7 PL OCR STRUC7URF5 WII I NOT f3F AI.I OwF❑ VATHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL- OF CITY FNGINFFR op Special Details .�. CITY of STANDARD CATCH BASIN Fb 44-fli-TS HUGO WITHOUT SUMP (2'x3') HU-SD-4 EST.1906 03-12-20 NOTES: 1. THIS DRAWING IS TYPICAL FOR ALL FLARED END SECTIONS. 2. FOR CULVERT CROSS ENGS, ALL JOINTS TO BE TIED. 3, LAST TWO JOINTS SHALL BE TIED, 4. TYING SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE UNIT BID PRICE FOR APRON SECTION. 5- MARKING POST SMALL BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR. CITY CIF EST. 1906 (3) 1-114" HOLES USE (3) 1" BOLTS AND TIE TO SHEET PILING {TYP} #4 AT 16" O.C. STAGGERED 2. 300 PSI DNCRETE (TYR) {TYP) I` (3) 1.114" HOLES USE (.3) 1" BOLTS AND TIE TO PLAN SHEET PILING 3000 PSI CONCRETE 94 EACH FACE #4 EACH FACE INTERLOCK) 10 GAUGE MINIMUM OUTSIDE WIDTH OF END $ 4 SECTION PLUS 4' 0• (TYf ) ELEVATION Special Details PILING FOR STORM SEWER Em 04-01-15 APRONS (24" DIA. & LARGER) HU-SD-7 03-12-20 CITY CIF R I TRAP TUGO DETAIL y� EST. 1fi0H z 4 d m� N0 3 m� Cc, �L w 60. isk--�a toa 104 LuL� wa u. Ld . z O si ¢ a; 000 Uui U �� nU_j sr Ill CO 6 i70 a3 z LL6 Ln W�j LL 2 8 J T= LL�13. z � ~UUauL.Lm�ui O x �u w 9 MW 0 Z J� a a 8-0. '} LLa0 0 w-rr�wm�z af �yI3J- 0 002 mdiunI W m0Ir �.i 6 aLLLW3c~s� L�7¢ 0C1' a w I= co U W 02 ��WQ C7UIYOJ �1Le- O . C4 v; a Sri z J 4 l 0 Ea ca x � " UU Qd zINN a0. a fr W� w'm� 2 J ?1•jy LL 0 a w� rn w x o g 1. a. mx 0 a LL Q =� w OZ� Iz V Nr tii7 CL c�❑ as CL asCl 4 a ;n a .- IT a?a Special Details D 03-01-10 HU-SD-8 03-12.20 STANDARD NEENAH 7' R-1542 FRAME WITH TYPE B SELF SEALING 27 "DIA. LID WITH 2 CONCEALED PICK HOLES. LID SHALL BE INSTALL EXTERNAL LABELED "STORM SEWER" MANHOLE CHIMNEY SEAL MANUFACTURED POLYETHYLENE (PE) BY INFI-SHEILD ADJUSTING RINGS (MIN 4" - 16" GATOR WRAP OR MAX 12'). USE THICKER APPROVED EQUAL ADJUSTING RINGS WHEN FEASIBLE TO MINIMIZE NUMBER OF RINGS. SHIMMING ADJUSTING RINGS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. STANDARD OFFSET ECCENTRIC CONE SECTION REDUCERS TO 6E (STEPS NOT SHOWN USED FOR 60" INTENTIONALLY) & 72" BARRELS 1--4 ' GROUTING BETWEEN PIPE AND MANHOLE 8" w BARREL SHALL BE WITH wfi k 1 4'-0" 'x NOW SHRINKING : s CEMENT. 48"-72" j 48"-72" :? VOIDS FILLED WITH USE R-2 TYPE :R CONCRETE BRICK :ONFINE : j OR BLOCK ONLY. ; _ GROUT GASKETT JOINTS GROUT JOINTS �'t 3 � . FOR ALL ' LU }F, MANHOLE JOINTS w I f; "' ., ~. :•, T�; DIRECTION�- OF FLOW •"' 1-- ! 112 DIA, OF PIPE •-r. 'xJ� -1'- .y ,,f�=s• W DIRT 0T101 PRECAST •c"s:" )`.'z`.r.- e:• OF FLOW 4Q BOTTOM y 6" RECAST BASE SECTION WITH POURED INVERT NO SCALE 15 AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY NOTES: 1. MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS-8-PF (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.) CONFORMING TO ALL OSFIA REGULATIONS AND SPACED 16" O.C. LOCATE ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF MANHOLE. 2, STEPS SHALL BE PLACED 50 THAT THE OFFSET VERTICAL PORTION OF THE CONE IS FAC]NG DOWN STREAM. 3. THE INMAL AMU FINAL RAISING OF CASTINGS SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL. 4. BLOCK STRUCTURES WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. 6, INVERT AND DOGHOUSE COATING SHALL BE STRONG-SEALO QSR, OR APPROVED EQUAL, 7. STEPS ARE NOT REQUIRED ON STRUCTURES LESS THAN 4 FEET. 7, MARKING POST SHALL BE SUPPLIED AND INSTALLED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT ALL MANHOLES LOCATED OUTSIDE OF THE STREET SECTION. Special Details CITY CIF N" STANDARD MANHOLE FOR 04-01-15 EST. 1806 STORM DRAIN HU-SD-1 03-12-20 CENTER STRUCTURE TO BACK OF CURB CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB BOX NEENAH NO. R-3067V INSTALL INFI-SHIELD GATOR WRAP EXTERNAL MANHOLE CHIMNEY SEAL OR APPROVED EQUAL. ' EXTERNAL SEAL SHALL BE INSTALLED ACCORDING +. TO THE MANUFACTURE'S RECOMMENDATIONS. PLAN 24" 48" • 72" - - FLOW LINE SHALL BE MIN. 07BELOW TOP OF CURB POLYEHTYLENE (P€) ADJUSTING RINGS (MIN 4"- MAX 12"). USE THICKER ADJUSTING RINGS WHEN FEASIBLE TO MINIMIZE NUMBER OF RINGS. SHIMMING OF ADJUSTING RINGS WILL NOT BE ALLOWED. MANHOLE COVER TO BE CRETEX TYPE hi WITH 24" x 38' SQUARE OPENING L -<� 4 > r GROUT x 36. SUMP x: PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION WITH ` POURED INVERT 6" PRECAST BASE SECTION A -A #5 AT 12" O.C. EACH WAY VOIDS FILLED WITH CONCRETE BRICK OR BLOCK ONLY NOTES: 1- REINFORCING TO CONSIST OF #4 BARS @ 8' O.C. BOTH WAYS 2. GROUT BOTTOM TO DRAIN TO CENTER 3. CORE DRILL INTO EXISTING MANHOLE 4. APPROVED INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL WEAR COURSE IS PAVED S. DRAIN TILE TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS (50' IN EACH DIRECTION WITH CLEAN OUT). SEE DETAIL HU-SO-8 FOR DRAINTILE CONNECTION INTO STRUCTURE AND HU-SS-3 FOR CLEAN OUT CONSTRUCTION. 6. INVERT AND DOGHOUSE COATING SHALL BE STRONG -SEAL OQSR, OR APPROVED EQUAL. NO SCALE TBLOCK STRUCTURES WILL NOT BE ALLOWED WITHOUT PRIOR APPROVAL OF CITY ENGINEER �► CITY CIF Special Details CATCH BASIN MANHOLE 0e1� WITH 3' SUMP �-01-15 H u-S D- FWGO EST.1806 03.12-2G PLAN N' r ITS] DE MH WALL TO FLAT BAR = 1' PROVIDE 4-112• SS ANCHOR BOLTS W/ CLIPS A HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED GRATE IN 2 SECTIONS 114' x V FLAT BAR (ROLLED TO PROVIDE OUTER RING) L #5 SMOOTH BAR @ 4" O.C. EACH WAY (PROVIDE 3-114" x PLAN 3-1/4" OPENING) PLACE LOWER SIDE OF STRUCTURE TOWARDS POND ELEVATION SECTION A -A INVERT AND DOGHOUSE COATING SHALL BE STRONG -SEAL 8 QSR, OR APPROVED EQUAL. Special Details t==21, CITY C7F POND OUTLET SKIMMER na 01-T5 STORM SEINER HU-SD-10 EST. 1906 03-17-20 (CRO7H0 SRO�e a m O M p Civil Engineering - Surveying - Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 O N N LO E >1 _(D t0' V\ z i M _0 O o J CD p (D _ (D � > -_ \� Q _0 / O O Ar W O� ♦ ^ V � O s CO H- U W O D_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL DETAILS C502 COPYRIGHT 2020CIVIL SITE GROUP IN HACK OF CURB / ''I� FLOW LINE O 0" 0" Q FRONT OF GUTTER A PERPENDICULAR A-11 0 NON -WALKABLE OR S NON WALKABLE OR WALKABLE SURFACE-. WALKABLE A 4 O O FLARE FLARE Q p', I O., (DA TIERED -PERPENDICULAR C T 5 0- - ---O O D D.. ( C PARALLEL CURB OR VAR. CURB AND GUTTE R, VA`R- _ G.. a D.OS FT./ T. ! CONCRETE 5 D.OA3 FT,JFT WALK sEortoN a -A PERPENDICULAR/TIERED/CIAGONAL CURB OR EORB AND GUTTER /4" R- A R! I �VAR. � -- - 6„ > .F7-! CONCRETE OO FT./ WALK 50.05 FT JF7 F F///, F//// SECTION B-B FAN CURB 0R LIAR AND C �m A. }.,,I $oN WALK S 8Y,-1O% FLARE O On NON-WRLNABLE OR WALKABLE DIAGONAL SURFACE 2% MAX. 0 SHALL ONLY BE USED AFTER ALL FAN@ P OTHER CURB RAMP TYPES HAVE BEEN EVALUATED AND DEEMED IMPRACTICAL B%-lU'/. FLARE NOTES: LANDINGS SHALL BE LOCATED ANYWHERE THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE {PARICHANCE5 R AT T P T pI ECTION. HE TO OF RAMPS THAT HAVE RUNNING SLOPES GREATER THAN 5.0%. AND IF THE APPROACHING WALK 15 INVERSE GRADE GREATER THAN 2%. TNT T JAL CURB RAMP LANDINGS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED WITHIN IS' FROM THE BACK OF CURB. WITH 6' FROM THE BACK OF CURB BEING THE PREFERRED DISTANCE. ONLY APPLICABLE WHEN THE INITIAL RAMP RUNNING SLOPE IS OVER 5AX.. SECONDARY CURS RAMP LANDINGS ARE REQUIRED FOR EVERY 30, OF VERTICAL RISE WHEN THE LONGITUDINAL RUNNING SLOPE IS GREATER THAN 5.0% CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR, 1/1" DEEP VISUAL JOINTS SHALL BE USED AT THE TOPS OF CONCRETE FLARES ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACES ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAR SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR TO THE PATH OF TRAVEL THUS BOTH SIDES OF A SLOPED WALKING SURFACE MUST BE EQUAL LENGTH. IE%CEP7 AS STATED IN 6 BELOW. TO ENSURE INITIAL AMPS AND INITIAL LANDINGS ARE PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED LANDINGS R SHALL BE CAST SEPAR AIEL Y. FOLLOW SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DETAILS W4 SHEET 6 AND THE ADA SPECIAL PRN15ION5 -PROSECUTION OF WORK IAOAI. TOP OF CURB SHALL MATCH PROPOSED ADJACENT WALK MACE. Y WHEN SHE BOULEVARD G 4' WIDE L LESS. THE TOP OF CURB TAPER SHALL MATCH THE RAMP T SLOPES 0 REDUCE NEGATIVE BOULEVARD SLOPES FROM THE TOP BACK OF CURB TO THE PAR. ALL RAMP TYPES SHOULD RAVE A MINIMUM 3'LONG RAMP LENGTH. +'MINIMUM WIDTH OF DETECTABLE WARNING IS RECUIRED FOR ALL RAMPS, DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL CONTINUOUSLY EXTEND FOR A MIN.OF 24" IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL,DETECTASLE WARNING TO COVER ENTIRE WIOTR OF SHARED -USE PATHS AND THE ENTIRE PAR WIDTH OF THE WALK. DETECTABLE WARNING SHOULD BE 6" LESS THAN THE PAR/TR0.1L WIDTH. ARC LENGTH OF RgOi■L DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHOULD NOT BE GREATER THAN 20 FEET, RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL RE SETBACK 3" FROM THE BACK OF CURB -RADIAL EETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL BE SETBACK 3" MINIMUM TO 6" MAXIMUM FROM THE BACK OF CURB. © MATCH FULL HEIGHT CURB. 2Q 4' MINIMUM DEPTH LANDING REQUIRED ACROSS TOP OF RAMP, 7Q 3" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 3- LING RAMP, I" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 4' LONG RAMP. 4 SEE SHEET 4 OF 6 TYPICAL SIDE TREATMENT OPTIONS FOR DETAILS ON FLARES AND RETURNED CURBS, WHEN INITIAL LANCING IS AT FULL CURB HEIGHT. 5 DETEC7ABLf WARNINGS MAY BE PART OF THE 4 ' X 4'MIN. LANDING AREA IF IT IS NOT FEASIBLE T4 CONSTRUCT THE LANDING OUTSIDE OF THE DETECTABLE WdRNINC AREA. 6 THE CRATE BREAK SHALL BE PERPENDICULAR 70 THE BACK OF WALK. T 7475 WILL ENSURE O THAT THE GRADE BREAK S P HP NPIC AR 7 TH DIRECTION OF TRAY YP CA FO A E PE U E4 I E E uA P E UI EC I EBLE. / L R ALL( Q WHEN ADJACENT TO CRASS, GRADING SHALL ALWAYS 8E USED WHEN FEASIBLE.V CURB, IF USED, SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE SIDEWALK LIMITS WHEN RIGHT GF WAY ALLOWS. WHEN AO J0.CENT TO PARKING LOTS, CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS TAPERS SHOULD BE USED OVER V CURB TO REDUCE TRIPPING HAZARDS AND FACILITATL SNOW & ICE REMOVAL. 8 A Y'MIN TOP RADIUS 1,1111 BREAK REQUIRED TO BE CONSTRUCTIBLE, 9 PAVE FULL WALK WIDTH. "S" SLOPES ON FANS SHALL ONLY BE USED WHEN ALL OTHER FEASIBLE OPTIONS HAVE BEEN W EVALUATED AND DEEMED IMPRACTICAL. LEGEND THESE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE RANGES SHALL BE THE STARTING POINT. IF SITE COWRIE ON WAR ANT LONGITUDINAL P U T❑ 3% OR FLATTER All D- 15 R UPI AE SLOPES P 8. L ER E INDSCATES PEDESTRIAN R MP - 5 P SHA BETWEEN 5 A LO E LL EC 5.0% MINIMUM AND 8.3% MAXIMUM 1N THE DIREL TION SHOWN AND THE CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.OX. TINDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL BE GREATER THAN 2,C% AND LE55 THAN S.OY. FN THE DIRECTION SHOWN ANO CI1055 SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED 2.02. LANDING AREA - 4'X 4'MIN.IS'x 5' MIN. PREFERRED( DIMENSIONS AND MAX 2.07 SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. LANDING SHALL BE FULL WIDTH OF INCOMING PARS. %" CURB HEIGHT WALK jk�rvrlrio-" ,}y111U1J'SECTION C-C A11.1Eo, PARALLEL/DEPRESSED CORNER STATEDfSIGNENWREEP 1-2' PLACE DETECTABLE FACE OF CURB/PROJECTCD WARNINGS ENTIRE ` FACE OF CURB WALK/PATS WHYS ______ LANDING: g4�+, MATCH INPLACE Of CURE HEIGHT MATCH INPLALE WALKABLE WALKABLE C O CURB HEIGHT DETECTABLE FLARE SNAP FLARE CMT6 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ BPC'A DF C B I WARNMLS WALKABLE WALKABLE I4AER ' SURFACE e_l6'/. 8-]0% SURFACE O 11 pPER I® t�LANIIIT ONCRETE m ONLRET I CUSS FLARE FLARE O © I e- �v. 2 1 2 CURB 1 RAIL rAPeR CiYRe T pPEH D .. 3" MINIMUM CURB HEIGHT, 4" PREFERRED I 4'E.5' CROSSING PAYED FLARES (MEASURED Al FRONT FACE OF CURBI _ SURFACE -• ADJACENT TO WALKABLE SURFACE i v FOR A M[N. 6" LENGTH IMEASURLV ALONG FLOW LINE( DETECTABLE EDGE WITH EQ LANDING; CURB AND GUTTER PEDESTRIAN GATEARM EDGE OF NON -WALKABLE R�NCRETF NON-WALKABLE ROAD 13 SURFACE SURFACE RAILROAD lT6 Is T GATE ARM O DETECTABLE CONCRETECO�T 6 I WARNINGS FLARE ILIRIJ 1'MINIMVM 6 7 F _,4_,.._ PAVED FLARES 6 ' 6 0 RAILROAD CROSSING ADJACENT TO NON -WALKABLE SURFACE1. PLAN VIEW EKE OF ROAD 7 NOTES: .......... SEE STANDARD PLATE 7038 AND THIS SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL DETAILS ON DETECTABLE WARNING, RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNING RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNING A WALKABLE SURFACE I5 DEFINED AS A PAVED SURFACE ADJACENT TO A CNRB RAMP WITHOUT RAISED OBSTACLES THAT COULD MISTAKENLY BE TRAVERSER BY A USER WHO VISUALLY IMPAIRED. LANDING DETECTABLE EDGE WITHOUT C RS AND GUTTER CONCRETE FLARE LENGTHS ADJACENT TO NON -WALKABLE SURFACES SHOULD BE LESS THAN E'LONC MEASURED ALONG THE RAMPS FROM THE BACK OF CURE. 1 0' CURB HEIGHT. R D AMP NON -WALKABLE NON -WALKABLE 2 FULL CURB HEIGHT. SURFACE _e 1.6R SURFACE DS 2'FUR 4" HIGH CURB AND 3- FOR E" HIGH CURB. GRADED GRADED 4 SIDE TREATMENTS ARE APPLICABLE TO ALL RAMP TYPES AND SHOULD 8E IMPLEMENTED AS ONNrrnrCMAINTENANCE AS FIELD 'FLARE m FLARE F Q CONDITIONS DICTATE. THE ENGINEER SHALL. DETERMINE THE RAMP SIDE TREATMENTS BASED ON MAINTENANCE ., .�.�,/." „r OF BOTH ROADWAY AMU SIDEWALK. ADJACENT PROPERTY CONSIDER 0.TION5. AND MITSGA 7ING CDN57RUC TION IMPACTS . 3 3 1i' 2 1 2 5 TYPICALLY USED FOR UEDIANS AND [SLANTS. d 9 \�' 6- WHENF PROPOSED. H R T l F ■ T NO CONCRETE CARES APE RG GSEP,T E CONS E E WALK SHALL $E FORMED ND CONSTRUCTED "-'�,�,���. /,ram 0 PERPENDICULAR TB THE EDGE OF ROADWAY, udINTdIN 3" MAX, BETWEEN EDGE OF DOMES AND EDGE OF CONCRETE. GRADED FLARES "',��$;�'•-�Y QT IF NO CURB AND GUTTER IS PLACED IN RURAL SECTIMS,DETECTADLE WARNINGS SHALL BE PLACED 1' FROM yr ;. ., '�""' THE EDGE OF BITUMINOUS ROADWAY AND/OR B[Tl1A1IN0U5 SM dRED-HIE PATH TO PROVIDE VISUAL CONTRAST. .H, 2 8 ' ALL CONS7 Rl1CTED CURBS MUST HAVE A CONTINUOUS DETECTABLE EDGE FOR THE VISUALLY IMPAIREO- ---------- 5 THIE ➢ T CTABLEED E REQUIRES DETECTABLE WARNINGS WHEREVER THERE IS ZER -INCH HIGH CURB.CURB TAPERS ARE CONSIDERED D DETECTABLE EGGS WHEN THE TAPER STARTS WITHIN 3" OF THE EDGE OF THE 'LANDING DETECTABLE WARNINGS AND UNIFORMLY RISES TO A 3-INCH MINIMUM 1CURBDER HEIGHT.DETECT CLRB NOT MC 1J2" R. A DETECTABLE VAR. DF 0. CURB TAPER RNO LESS THAN 3 INCHES IN HEIGHT IS NOT CONSIDERED DE EC ABLf EDGE AMC ART CURB DESIGN Y - THEREFORE GROUT NOT - COMPLIANT WITH ACCESSIBILITY STANDARDS. CURB DESIGN V 6" 4" TURF OR 9 DRILL AMCGROUT 1 - N0. 9 S2" LONG REINFORCEMENT BAR (EPOxY COATED) WITH 3" MIN. COVER . SEE PEDESTRIAN SEC PEDESTRIAN COL4GgETE T� OF GUTTER CURB Q T Y RAMP REINFORCEMENT BARS ARE NO NEEOEO IF THE APPROACH NOSE IS POURED INTEGRAL WITH THE CURE. APPROACH N05E APPROACH NOSE DESIGN v � o� DETAIL OE7RIL @ DRILL AND GROUT 2 - N0.4 12' LONG HELNFURCEMENT CARS IEPOKY COATEUIwITH 3" MIN. COVER.REINFURCEMENT NON -WA LKA$LE NON-AXL KABLE < T'• B B BARS ARE NDT NEEDED IT THE APPROACH NOSE IS POURED INTEGRAL WITH THE CURB AND GUTTER. SURFACE m SURFACE d 5IDE TREATMENT EXAMPLES SHOWN ARE WHEN THE INITIAL LANDING IS APPROXIMATELY LEVEL WITH THE FULL A HEIGlTI CURB (I.E. 6' LONG RAMP FOR 6" HIGH 'CURE). WHEN THE INITIAL LANDING IS MUSE THAN P BELOW SECTION A -A FULL HEIGHT CNRB REFER TO SMELTS 1 & 2 TO MODIFY THE CURB HEIGHT TAPERS AID MAINTAIN POSITIVE CURE W 2 60ULEYAHD DRAINAGE. 2 1 GUTTER Q / ® NEAREST EDGE OF DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL BE PLACED 12'AIISLE W TO 1G BE CLOSER FROM THE 2' NEAREST RAIL. FOR SKEWED RATLWAYS 1N NO INSTANCE SHALL THE DETECTABLE WARNING BE CLOSER THAN 12' URF DR fi' / MEASURED PERPENDICULAR TO THE NEAREST RAIL. RETURNED R E NED cu B s O III 1 CONCR T I T F / C E OR 0 SIDEWALK O 3 WHEN PEDESTRIAN G TES ARE PROVIDED, DETECTABLE WARNING SURFACES SHALL QWA 1 i - �GY RF PLACED ON THE SIDE OF THE 40.TF5 OPPOSITE THE RAIL.?'FROM THE TYPICAL SIDE TREATMENT OPTIONS ® h h/2 - 2 Q A APPROACHING ELUL OF ARE GATE ARM"THIS CRITERIA GOVERNS OVER NOTE (l�2 6, (0 CROSSING SURFACE SHALL EXTEND 2' MINIMUM PAST THE OUTSIDE EDGE OF WALK OR SHARED -USE PATH. ® 5 Y FOR MEDIANS AND SPLITILR ISLANDS. NDSE AN BE REDUCED TO 2'ON FREE RIGHT ISLANDS. 9 3, G ® SNTO BE PLACED B.N, FROM THE FRCS OF CURB/PROJCCTFACE OF CURE.THIS SECTION a-B EN SJRES JRES MIN. CLEAR ANCE BETWEEN THE SIDEWALK AND GATE ARM COUNTERWEIGHT SUPPORTS. PEDESTRIAN APPROACH ,,*Ill#"( K �. REVISION: NOSE DETAIL �► t PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS CURB IFOft RETURNED U APPR YE[I: JAN ARY 23. 201I //�/q�j,,1 01- U 5IDE TREATMENTS(�,gI I ufYlgym' -r---- ,,��,�. 1-23-2017 STANDARD PLAN 5-237.250 4 OF 6 STATE DESIGN ENGINEEP • !.% ��//// �i.,. - I'll . jII %� i �► IL& - �c► ®��0� s OI �® + 3 FT MIN. TOP WIDTH / ..::: EXTEND ENKAMAT PER RCWD % / : DIRECTION. NEED TO PREVENT INSTALL ENKAMAT PER MANUF. SPECIFICATIONS EROSION WITHOUT ISOMETRIC VIEW REMOVING VOLUME FROM DITCH L = 8 FT. 2 FT MIN. EARTH BERM ,�//���� VARIES IA/FIR (`RFQT !/ \/� 7\\\�\u-/ SEE GRADIGN PLAN FOR xiBASIN DEPTH j GROUND LINE / SECTION A -A BASIN BOTTOM RIPRAP OUTLET / OVERFLOW WALKABLE SURFACE (D IIQL O Z' a p.� I -I / (DI -I v _____0 0.1 S N N-WA KdB SURFACE LL X'-\ � a(D 9FS D 2 BACK OF CURB 4 eP9s O" 5'MAX FLOW LINE O 1 O O FRONT OF CUTTER COMBINES DIRECTIONAL � Fo� x 1 Q NON -WALKABLE SURFACE 0\ O" _______ ___________ 0" IF NON -CONCRETE BLVD. IS CONSTRUCTED AND IS LESS THAN Z'IN WIDTH AT TOP Of CURB TRANSITION, N PAVE CONCRETE RAMP WIDTH TO AD JR Acrc UR CE r B PF L B. STANDARD ONE-WAY DCRECTIONAL 9 Q NOTES: LANDINGS SHALL BE LOCATED ANYWHERE THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE WARICHANGES DIRECTION, AT THE TOP OF RAMPS THAT HAVE RUNNING SLOPES GREATER THAN 5A%, AND IF THE APPROACHING WALK IS INVERSE GRADE. T P CONSTRUCTED K 14L CURB RAM LANDINGS SHALL BE UC ED WITHIN THE 11 OF THE BACK OF CUB BEING THE ED DISTANCE, 8 BEING DISTANCE, ONLY OF CURB, WITH ONLY THE APPLICABLE WHEN THE INITIAL RAMP RUNNING SLOPE OVER 5.0%. WHEN OVER 5. E SECONDARY CURB RAMP LANDINGS ARE REQUIRED FOR EVERY 30" OF VERTICAL RISE RAMP A WHEN THE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE 15 GREATEN THAN 5.0-/--. CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED ALONG ALL GRADE BREAKS WITHIN THE PAN. 1/4" DEFP VISUAL JOINTS SHALL RC USED AT THE TOP GRADF BREAK OF CONCRETE FLARES ADJACENT TO WAEKABLE SURFACES. ALL GRATE BREAKS THE PAR SHALL PERPENDICULAR TO THE PATH OF TRAVEL. m B% TO TOY. SLOPE F A S R THIS BOTH SIDES OF A SLOPED WALKING SURFACE MUST BE EQUAL LENGTH, BE E TO ENSURE INITIAL RAMPS AND INITIAL LAND7NOS ARE PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED, LANDINGS SHALL BE CAST SEPARATELY.FOLLOW SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DETAILS ON SHEET 6 AND THE ADA SPECIAL PROVISTON (PROSECUTION OF WORK). TOP OF CURB SHALL MATCH PROPOSED ADJACENT WALK GRADE. 9' T WHEN THE BOULEVARD I5 WIDE OR LESE, HE 70P OF CURB TAPER SHALL MATCH THE RAMP SLOPES TQ PETUCE NEGATIVE 80ULEYARp SLOPES FROM TXE TOP BACK OF CURB TD THE PAfl, ALL RAMP TYPES SHOULD HAVE A MINIMUM J'LONG RAMP LENGTH. 4'MINIMUM WIDTH OFDETECTABLE WARNING IS REQUIRED FOR ALL RAMPS. DETECTABLF WARNINGS 5HALL CONTINUOUSLY EXTEND FOR A MIN. OF 24" IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL.DETECTABLE WARNING TO COVER ENTIRE WIDER OF SHARED -USE PATH AND THE ENTIRE PAR WIDTH OF DIRECTIONAL RAMP WALKABLE FLARE THE WALK. DETECTABLE WARNING SHOULD BE 6" LESS THAN THE PAR/PATH WNTH. ARC LENGTH OF RADIAL DLTECTABLL WARNINGS SHOVLO NOT BE UNLATCH THAN 20 FEET, RADIAL DET CT0.B E WARNINGS 5HALL BE SETBACK 3" MINIMUM TO 6" MAXIMUM FROM THE BACK OF CURE. SEE NOTES P, FOR INFORMATION REGARDING RECTANGULAR DETECTABLE WARNING PLACEMENT, © MATCH FULL CURB HEIGHT, (D 3" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 3'LONG RAMP 4" HIGH CURB WHEN USING A 4'LDNG RAMP, O3 3" MINIMUM CURB HEIGHT ME' MIN. DISTANCE REQUIRED BETWEEN Comm 9" PREFERRED f7'MIN. 0157gNLE REQUIRED BETWEEN DOMES(. ® THE "BUMP" IN BETWEEN THE RAMPS SHOULD NOT BE IN THE PATH OF TRAVEL FOR COMBINED DIRECTIONAL RAMPS. IF THIS OCCURS MODIFY THE RAMP LOCATION OR SWITCH RAMP TO A FAN/DEPRESSED CORNER. GRADE 0 WHEN USING CONCRETE PAVED FLARES ON THE OUTSIDE OF OIRFCTIONAL RAMPS, AND ADJACENT TO A GRADE RAM BREAK RAMP P I 0 MAX. SLOPEN BREAK WALK ABLE SURFACE. OIRE[TIDNAL RAMP FLARES SHOULD BE USED. SEE THE DETAIL ON THIS SHEET. MAX.'2.Ox SLOPE GRADING SHALL ALWAYS BE USED WHEN FEASIBACE CURB IF USED SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE SIDEWALK 6 A R C7 ON Q 7 ALL AI F 1 5 LIMITS WHEN RIGHT OF WAY ALLOWS. WHEN ADJACENT TG PARKING LOTS. CONCRETE OR BITUMINOUS TAPERS IN ALL DIRECTIONS DI SHOULD BE USED OVER v CURB TO REDUCE TRIPPING HAZARDS AND FACILITATE SNOW B ICE REMOVAL. Q MAX-2.0% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS 1N FRONT OF GRADE BREAK AND CRAIN TO FLOW LINE -SHALL BE p. CONSTRUCTED INTEGRAL WITH CURS AND GUTTER. © 6% TO 107 WALKADLF FLARF, ' Q9 PLACE DOMES AT THE BACK OF CURB WHEN ALLOWABLE SETBACK CRITERIA IS EXCrcom ® FRONT EDGE OF DETECTABLE WARNING SHALL BE SET BACK E'MA%jMUM WHEN ADJACENT TO WALKABLE 1.SURF ALE. AND 5' MAXIMUM WHEN ADJACENT TO NON -WALKABLE SURFACE WITH ONE CORNER SET 3" FROM i O O : Q WITHOUT RAISED OBSTACLES SURFACE TH T COULD MISTAKENLY BE TROVERSID) BY SURFACE ADJACENT VISUALLYRAMP USER WHO IS CURB 'I 11 IMPAIRED. R AN A DETECTABLE WARNINGS Y SET II K P TO B" F THE A 0 CORNERS i1 ECT GFR R D EC ABCE INGS BE E B C U FROM C BACK F LURE WITH C EP5 DETECTABLE WARNING PLACEMENT WHEN C SET 3" FROM BACK OF CURB. IF O" SETBACK IS E%CEEOEA USE RADIAL DETECTABLE WARNINGS. . E SETBACK CRITERIA IS EXCEEDED ® FOR DIRECTIONAL RAMPS WITH THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS PLACED 47 THE BACK OF CURB THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL COVER THE ENTIRE WIDTH Or THE WALK/PATH. THIS ENSURES A DETECTABLE EDGE AND HELPS ELIMINATE -THE CURB TAPER OBSTRUCTING THE PATH OF PEDESTRIAN TRAVEL. ONE-WAY DIRECTIONAL WITH DETECTABLE THE CONCRETE WALK SHALL BE FORMED AND CONSTRUCTED PLRPENCICVLAR TO THE BACK OF CURB. WARNING AT BACK OF CURB T F F N MAIN AIN 3 BETWEEN EDGED TOMES AND EDGE 0 CONCRETE. ® TO BE USED FOR ALL DIRECTIONAL RAMPS EXCEPT WHERE DOME5 ARE PLACED ALONG THE BACK OF CURB 1.0% MIN. 2.0Y. MAX VAR. RAMP E 0 R I URFACE P 6" CONCRETE WALK BACK OF CURB FLOW LINE GUTTER GUTTER SLOPE SECTION D-O FRONT OF GUTTER CURB FOR DIRECTIONAL RAMPS EXISTING *-... rl/2'R. WALK ...,.�1,.' • a' / o,I r11. R. I _ �`' �YL VARIABLE ,1HEICHT H T 6.i V CURB ADJACENT TIl LANDSCAPE 2 CURB WITHIN SIUEWALA LIMITS 1 ---E%ISTING - -�­ j" R. �a.,/�JHaia,Yy/W7 VARIABLE �Yy-. EIGHT I �" 6, z W V CURB ADJACENT TO LA�fOSCAPi CURB OUTSIDE SIDEWALK LIMITS r,S 1/2" R. fig. .��m*�� J � iFl Q-11F1'R V CURB INTERSECTION V CURB ADJACENT TO BUILDING OR BARRIER CONCRETE CURB DESIGN V CURB HEIGHT H CURB WIDTH w 4" a T,1 6" 6" CONCRETE WALK M Lass s 31 MIN MUM C N LEGE P T - SE 0.GGREGA E BA THESE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE DANCES SHALL BE THE STARTING POINT, UP SITE CONDITIONS W0.RRANT,LONGITUDINAL SLOPES UP TO O.M. OR FLATTER ARE ALLOWED. _ 4' S INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE SHALL BE BETWEEN 4- a r 1-0% MINIMDM AND E3X, MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND THE CROSS SLOPE SHALL N07 EXCEED 2.0%. F INDICATES PEDESTRIAN RAMP - SLOPE HALL BE -ATER Jo THAN AMC LESS WAN IN THE P T ON SHOWN X I C 1 TYPICAL PIC L SIDEWALK SECTION I CROSS ] . AND CROSS SLOPE SHALL NO] EXCEED 2.OY--. WITHIN INTERSECTION CORNER LANDING AREA - 4' X T MIN. (TX 5' MIN. PREFERRED) DIMENSIONS AMC MAX ® 2.0% SLOPE IN ALL DIRECTIONS. LANDING SHALL BE FULL WIDTH OF INCOMING PARS. X" CURB HEIGHT VARIABLE HEIGHT H 6" 4' MIN. LANDING 4' MIN. LANDING �5 DISTANCE FROM APS PUSH B BUTTON TO EDGE OF SIDEWALK 6" WIDEINCHES6" M T NOT x O US EXCEED 1 Y-CUR B I WIDE V CURB DISTANCE FROM APS PUSH BUTTON TO EOCE OF SIDEWALK MU T NOT EXCEED 14 INCHES I F:2 1:2 G" WIDE Y-CURB 4" PUSH BUTTON STATION POLE A �+ 6" WIDE V-CURB IS" WIDE BY IB" LONG. MI N. 12" THICK CONCRETE. 30" SQUARE B 4" PEDESTAL POLE PEDESTAL FOUNH WITH SLIME UP CENTER OF POLE (MUST 8E FLUSH WITH PLAN VIEW MOOiiY THE PUSH BUTION STA710N TO ALLOW A SQUARE FOUNDATION, U E WITH THE BACK OF V-CNRB) THE SURROUNDING WALK] PLAN VIEW APS PUSH BUTTON (SADDTING SPAE LE ADAPTORS) SECTION B-B SIGNAL PEDESTAL & PUSH BUTTON (V-CURBM ARE PUSH BU MOUNTING SP, ISADOLE ADA( 18" WIDE CONCRETE MATCH HEIGHT A DUAL ENT 6" WIDE V-0 SECTION A -A PUSH BUTTON STATION (V-CURB) CASTING SCHEDULE CATCH BASIN/MANHOLE/RISER GRATE TYPE (NEENAH) REMARKS TBD R-3067 STORM CURB INLET TBD R-2501 STORM AREA DRAIN INLET TBD R-1642 STORM MANHOLE NOTE: 1. CASTINGS SHALL BE NEENAH FOUNDRY CASTINGS OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 2. CASTINGS SHALL BE STAMPED WITH APPROPRIATE UTILITY NAME ("STORM SEWER", "SANITARY SEWER") CASTING SCHEDULE N T S �`J NTIT S ' INSET A EXISTING SLE SIDEWALK -- _ - _I PEDESTRIAN PATH '4F 1 - TRAVEL LANDING RAMP( O ' TI RAMP I -------- LEI- NGTH -I --- - - - - - I 1 1 1 I's% QY4.5% ARJ SEMI -DIRECTIONAL RAMP (3,4.9) 1 I 7'UOME SETBACK. 4'LONG RAMP AND ' PUSH BUTTON 9'FROM THE BACK OF CURB I IPRIMARILY USED FOR. APS APPLICATIONS I' 6.0' `I WHERE THE PAR DOLS NOT CUNTINUE PAST I IYRR.) I THE PUSH BOLICN IDEAU-ENO SIDEWALK] - - - - - - - - ' INSET A TRANSITION PANEL D4O 5 NOTES: A WALKABLE FLARE IS AN 0-107 CONCRETE FLARF THAT 15 REOUFREP WHEN THE FLARE IS ADJACENT TO A WALKABLE SURFACE. ON WHEN THE PEDESTRIAN PATH Or TRAVEL OF A PUSH BDTTON TRAVERSES THE FLARE ALL V CURB CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL MATCH CONCRETE WALK JOINTS. WHERE RIGHT-DF-WAY ALLOWS USE OF V CURB SHOULD BE MINIMIZED. GRADING ADJACENT TURF OR SLOPING ADJACENT PAVEMENT 15 PREFERRED. V CURB SHALL BE PLACED OUTSIDE THE SIDEWALK LIMITS WHEN RIGHT OF WAY ALLOWS. V CURO NEXT TO BUILDING SHALL BE A 4" WIDTH AMC SHALL MATCH PREVIOUS TOP OF SIDEWALK ELEVATIONS- © ENO TAPERS At TRANSITION SECTION SHALL MATCH INPLALE SIDEWALK SPACES. D 2 ALL V CURB SHALL MATCH BOTTOM OF ADJACENT WALK. O 3 EDGE BETWEEN NEW V CURB AND INPLALE STRUCTURE SHALL BE SEALED AND BOND BREAKER SHALL BE USCG BETWEEN EXISTING STRUCTURE AND P ACED Y`UR B. O 4 ['L THE MAX. RATE OF CROSS SLOPE TRANSITIONING I5 INEAR FOOT OF SIDEWALK PER HALF PERCENT CROSS SLOPE WHEN PAR WIDTH 15 GREATER THAN 6'OR THE RUNNING SLOPE IS GREATER THAN 6%.DOUBLE THE CALCULATED TRANSITION LENGTH. DS TRANSITION PANELS ARE 70 ONLY BE USED AFTER THE RAMP,OR IF NEEDED,LANDING ARE AT THE FILL CURB HEIGHT (TYPICAL SECTIONI. (DEXISTING CROSS SLOPE GRATER THAN 2.0%. LEGEND THESE LONGITUDINAL SLOPE RANGES SHALL BE THE STARTING POINT.IE SITE CONDITIONS WARRANT, LONGITUDINAL SLOPES UP 10 8.3Y. OR FLATTER ARE ALLOWED. 5 INDICATES 11111111111 RAMP - SLIDE SHALL RE BETWEEN 5.0% MINIMUM AND 9.37.. MAXIMUM IN THE DIRECTION SHOWN AND THE CROSS SLOPE SHALL NOT EXCEED .0%. L E ! 2 MLANDING AREA - 4'9 4'MIN.f5'X 5'MIN. PREFERRED) DIMENSIONS AND MAX -0% SLOP N ALL IR CT ON AN NG A TN FINCOMING PAR 2 E I L D E I 5, L Di SHALL BE FULL WIDTH 0 5, Q TRANSITION PANELRSI- TO BE USED FOR TRANSIYIONING THE CROSS -SLOPE OF A RAMP TO THE EXISTING WALK CROSS-SLOPE.RATE OF TRANSITION SHOULD BE 0.5% PER I LINEAR FOOT OF WALK,SEE THIS SHEET FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION, MNDOT FINE FILTER AGGREGATE 3149.2J STABILIZED SUBGRADE A r.n nr-n ATr- nAC1F- GEOTEXTILE FABRIC J MNDOT 3733, TYPE 1 SIDES AND NOTE: FOR USE WITH CLAY SUBGRADES OR BOTTOM ONLY IN AREAS WITH LESS THAN 4 VERTICAL FEET OF FILL IF USING GRANULAR SUBGRADES. 4" PVC DRAIN TILE DETAIL N T S FRONT OF GUTTER INSET A INSET A INSET A l'J O BACK OF CURB/ FRONT OF GUTTER FRONT OF GUTTER - - BACK OF CURS/ BACK OF CURB/ I/4" = BJ FLOG OW EDGED WALK I/4O O FLOW LINE EDGE OF WALK 1/4O O FLOWOINE EDGE WALK _ 2-3,, K'J 5% 4 r, e A r l /9" " I/4" /9" T" I P' O 6" I I H... .O ,.. •• v.. s.. z4" B-Iz^ �,_ z4^ 71, .1 i _z+ I 13 OPTIONAL SILL CURB WHEN SIDEWALK. "� I- IS AT BALK OF CURB PERPENDICULAR IQ NON PERPENDICULAR 2Q FOR CURB MACHINE PLACEMENT AROOND RADIUS (�) CONCRETE SILL TO BE USED ONLY WHEN PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE CURE & GUTTER DETAIL (REGARDLESS of RAMP TYPEt SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN. 4INSET B VAR. RAMP MILL VERTICAL SAWCUT BIT. � S O EDGE & PAVEMENT REMOVE & REPLACE EXIST;NC BIT. 2" BITUM]NOUS EXISTING BIT. S14" MIN,TO PAVEMENT MILL & PATCH PAVEMENT III T. PAVEMENT I/2" MAX, 6" CONCRETE WALK d. -- -O 4-- R J BACK OF CURB/ P 0 EGTFD FRONT OF GUTTER FLOW LINE EDGE OF WALK 1/4" qQN�_�2"M;- 2r 4"NIN. 1/4" ®O 6% MAX- . d SAWCUT -_ X SAWCUT BIT. VARIABLE DEPTH CONCRETE PAVEMENT P Y M N A E E T CONCRETE BASS EXISTING 7 - - INSETA EXISTING BIT. CONCRETE PAVEMENT Q :" 2" 817. PATCH PAVEMENT 4 5 & 4 I o0 2k' B-12" p'a 9 INSET 6 9/2 e 1 OUTFLOW T u Law cu TER D I 20' MAX. RECOMMENDED TO HIT AFFECT PARKING 1 HOLD TANGENT 5' PAST OUTSIDE ZERO TO M1N. TAPER (DOWNSTREAM SIDE? _r/ -� / P 1:MIN, TARED 1:5 PREFERRED TAPER ONLY ALLOWED PER ENGINEER'S APPROVAL UPSTREAM smEl 1. PAVEMLNT TREATMENT OPTIONS IN FRONT OF CURB & GUTTER FOR USE ON CURB RAMP RETROFITS NOTES: POSITIVE FLOW LINE DRAINAGE SHALL BE MAINTAINED THROUGH THE PEDESTRIAN ACCESS ROUTE ORARI AT A 2% MAXIMUM. c ND PONDING SHALL RE PRESENT IN THE PAR. ANY VERTICAL LIP THAT OCCURS AT THE FLOW LINE SHALL NOT BE GREATER THAN I/4 INCH- 1 HOLD TANGENT 5' RO PAST OUTSIDE 2E © FOR USE CURS LOTS WHERE THE PEDESTRIAN'S PATH OF TRAVEL IS ASSUMED PERPENDICULAR TO THE GUTTED I E. FLOW LINE. RAMP TYPES INCLUDES PERPENDICULAR TIERED PERPENDICULAR, PARALLEL AND DIAGONAL RAMPS ' z 2fl FOR USE AT CURB RAMPS WHERE THE PEDESTRIAN'S PCr TRAVEL IS ASSUMED NON c 1 j PERPENDICULAR TO THE CUTTER FLOW LINE DAMP TYPES ES 1nCLU0E: FANS & DEPRESSED CORNERS- Q BEGIN GUTTED SLOPE TRANSITION ]0'PUTSNE OF ALL CURB RAMPS. Q THERE SHALL BE NO VERTICAL DISCMTINUT71ZS GREATER THAN 1/W' j SMALL RADIUS 50 ELEVATION CHANGE TAKES PLACE FROM THE EXISTING To NEW FRONT OF GUTTER. �' 2'-10' TYPICAL PATCH IS USED TO MATCH THE NEW GUTTER FACE INTO THE EXISTING ROAOWAT. 6 F DIRECTIONAL F VARIABLE WIDTH OR D] EG fONAt CURB APPLICATIONS. SEE SHEET 2 OR DIRECTIONAL CURB SLOPE REWIREMENTS. tt '_ w �'-. 0TOP FRONT OF GUTTER SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED FLUSH WITH PROPOSED ADJACENT PAVEMENT ELEVATION. ' w� / TOP OF THE GUTTER FACE MUST BE A FORMED EDGE- PAR GUTTER SHALL NOT BE OVERLAID- / 0 LTA" 8 SHOUp BE USED AT VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED ARIAS WHEN AT d DRAINAGE RICH POINT OR SUPER ELEVATED ROADWAY SEGMENTS. / 6 p IQ DRILL AND GROUT NO.4 LPDXY-COATLD IB" LONG TIE BARS AT 3D" CENTER TO LARGE RADIUS CENTER INTO EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT ('MINIMUM FROM ALL JOINTS. 23 20'-40' TYPICAL �.=L q�, HELPSP T K A CURB. NJ D TWO SEPARATE RAMPS, REDUCES THE DOME SETBACK LENGTH AND MINIMIZES OIAMPL LENGTH. Y THIS RADIUS DESIGN CLOSELY FOLLOWS THE TURNING VEHICLE PATH WHILE OPTIMIZING CURB RAMP LENGTH. THIS RADIUS CURB SHOULD BE USED IN VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED AREAS.RE ALLY IN DOWNTOWN ROADWAY SEGMENTS HERE SMALL RAONB PAREXTENSIONS ON -STREET EXTENSIONS SHOULD BE CONSIDERED FOR APS INTERSECTIONS WHERE SPACE IS LIMITED. ON -STREET PARKING IS ET APS PUSH BUTTONS MUST MEET APS CRITERIA AS DESCRIBED IN THE PUSH BUTTON LOCATION DETAIL SHEET. 2'-10'TYPICAL A� Q PLACE BOND BREAKER BE7wEEN WALK AND TOP OF SILL. COMBINED DIRECTIONAL ® ® 1/2" PREFORMED JOINT FILLER PER MNDOT SPEC.3702, (COMPOUND RADIUS) (a DIMENSION TO BE SAME AS SIDEWALK THICKNESS.4" MIN. ADA CURB EXTENSION WITH COMPOUND RADIUS (BUMP OUTS© BIHEMIA OF TRAFFIC MAIN STREET \ 11 PLAN VIEW \\ Q 0 2 N. \,♦ 2 ♦ \ 2 .. NON -CONCRETE NON -CONCRETE EXISTING I'll SIDEWALK EXISTING \ \ BOHLEVARD BOULEVARD SIDEWALK MAx. REPLACEMENT SIDEWALK LANDING \ \ 1.0% Him, 2 ♦ 5.0% MAX, \ \ \ LANDING LANDING \\ 2SAW CONCRETE \ \ \ e FULL DEPTH OR EXISTING \ \ JOINT (INCIDENTAL! \ \ ♦ PROFILE VIEW ♦ \\ \ \ \I & n ALLOWABG \ ♦ � CONCRETE CONCRETE 2 i \ \ \ttA$E1IAN \ '$ 80ULEVARO 80ll LCVARO q" SI WALK \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \\ \ \ o Qs (TYPICAL) \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ UB 5Q. s0 OPTIONAL SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT EDGE OF THROUGH LANE SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT To HE USED ONLY WHEN SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN, 1.0% MIN. 5.07.. MAX. EXPANSION MATERIAL PLACEMENT FOR OPTIONAL CURB LINE REINFORCEMENT O Un MIN. iZ CONCRETE AND BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS: PLACEMENT ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS 4 5.02 MAX - IV, MAk, SAWCUT CxISTAG CURB RO ANASED PAR AND GUTTCR EDGE OF THROUGH LANE CURB MID GUrtCR l2" \' PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP _ - _ 2•\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ w 3' MIN. 3" MIN. \ P4 , UP TO 2.U% 2.0% MA%. OR uP UP 70 2.OY. UP TU 2-D% \ \ \ C4iANGE TO q% CHANGE 7.OX MAX. OR uP - - \ \ ` \ CHANGE TO 4% CHANGE CHANGE SAWCUT \ LTNC\ TO USE ON CURB RAMP RETROFITS 7etC FLOW LINE PROFILE "TABLE" -TWIN PERPENDICULARS /2 CURB ANU GUTTER A � P Aw \ \ ROPOSEO [ORB 3 0 PEDESTRIAu RAMP AND COTTER REINFORCEMENT \ \ uP rD z.o% a.ax MAx. BR uP uP TD z.oz OPTIONAL CURB LINE REINFORCEMENT DETAILS (D(D CHANGE 70 4X CHANGE CHANGE \ \ \ \ FLOW LINE PROFILE "TABLE" - FAN 36' MAX, LANDING 1.0% MIN- 5.0'/. MAX. \ \ i PEDESTRIAN RAMP PEDESTRIAN RAMP 3" \ ANDING COY. MIN. .. f.OT- MIN. I.0% MIN- COY. MIN. ].OX MIN. a 1.5% PREFERRED 5.07. M X. 1.5% PREFERRED LANDING 5.0E MA%. 5:0% MAX. 36 MAX. \ FLOW LINE PROFILE RAISE - TWIN PERPENDICULARS Iz \ 3" 1, 32" 36" MAX. _ PEDESTRIAN RAMP 7f`I \ S,Ox MEN(, ].S:C PREFERRED 3.O% Mb%. 4Lz, MA%. 36" MAX. 121. FLOW LINE PROFILE RAISE FAN SEPARATE LANDING 3" CURB LINE ANO ROAD CROSSING ADJUSTMENTS POUR REINFORCEMENT N OT ES: °TABLING" OF CROSSWALKS ROADWAY MEANS MAINTAINING LESS THAN 2% CROSS SLOPE WITHIN A CROSSWALK, IS REQUIRE O WHEN ROADWAY IS IN d STOP OR YIELD CONDITION AND THE PROJECT SCOPE ALLOWS. ©,TO ENSURE RAMPS AND LANDINGS ARE PROPERLY CONSTRUCTED, ALL INITIAL LANDINGS 0.T ATOP OF A HAWED SURFACE RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. ON FULL PAVEMENT REPLACEMENT PROJECTS (SUMMING SLOPE GREATER THAN 2%) SHALL BE FORMED AND PLACED SEPARATELY IN AN INDEPENDENT CONCRETE POUR. "ING" 4F ENTIRE CROSSWALK SHALL OCCUR WHEN FEASIBLE. IABI. FOLLOW SIDEWALK REINFORCEMENT DETAILS ON THIS SHEET FOR ALL SEPARATELY POURED INITIAL LANDINGS. 2 TRILL AND GROUT NO.4 12" LONG REINFORCEMENT BARS AT 36" MAXIMUM CENTER O WILL W OVERLAY PROJECTS."TABLING" OF FLOW LINES IN FRONT OF THE PEDESTRIAN RAfA IS REQUIRED WHEN THE EXISTING FLOW LINE I5 GREATER THAN 2Y.. WARPING OF THE BITUMINOUS TO CENTER (EPDXY COATED). BARS TO BE REINFORCEMENT To MATCH RAMP GROAT PAVEMENT CAN NOT EXTEND INTO THE THROUGH LANE.TABLE THE FLOW LINE TO 2% OR AS Q3 DRILL AND GROUT 2 - N0.9 % 12" LONG REINFORCEMENT BARS {EPDXY COATED(. F MUCH 3, POSSIBLE WHILE ADHERING 10 THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA; REIN ORCEMENT REWIRED FOR ALL CONSTRUCTION JOINTS WITHIN RADIUS. A 1 .O MAX.LPOS-5 PE OF THE ROAD 1 1. 1 C LO D 4 THIS OPTIONAL CURB LINE REINFORCEMENT DETAIL SHOULD ONLY BE 215.0% MAX. CRO55-E LUPE OF THE ROAD O USED ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS WHEN SPECIFIED IN THE PLAN. 31 "TdBLE" FLOW LINE 4P TO 4% CHANGE FRp4 EXISTING SLOPE IN FRONT OF PEDESTRIAN RAMP 41 UP TO 2% CHANGL IN FLOW LINE FROM EXISTING SLOPE BEYOND THE PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP (S) 112 IN.PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL PER MNDOT SPEC.3702. STAND-ALONE ADA RETROFITSTFOLLOw WILL 6 OVERLAY CRITERIA ABOVE HOWEVER ALL PAVEMENT WARPING IS TONE WITH BITUMINOUS PATCHING ON BITUMINOUS ROADWAYS AND FULL -DEPTH APRON REPLACEMENT ON CONCRETE ROADWAYS. *,,vivo,I ,-,.. REVISION: I RAISING OF CURB LINES SNOVL$ OCCUR IN VERTICALLY CONSTRAINED RREAS.RAISE THE CURB LINES ENOUGH 70 'b PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP DETAILS ALLOW COMPLIANT' RAMPS OR As MUCH AS POSSIBLE WHILE ADHERING TO THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA, //1 APPR VEO: JANUARY 23, ?CI? 111.07. MIN. AND 5.C% MAXIMUM CROSS -SLOPE OF THE ROAD /I 0(ErA 4P ,� 2)i.o% MIN - FLOW LINE SON EITHER SIDE OF PEDESTRIAN RAMP)TO MAINTAIN POSITIVE DRAINAGE ^ r } * l 7 J- { ��--1 31 i.0% RECOMMENDED MA% -FLOW LINE �y} ry{a 41'-2?-'-2017 ST /riNDARD PLAN �_`�i�7.`G50 O OF C3 waPTro� 41 LONGITUDINAL THROUGH LANE RCADWAY TAPERS SHOULD BE 1" VERTICAL PER IS' HORIZONTAL DF TKA ST+T[ DESlGx ENGINEfP 1 J L PAVEMENT BASE 0 4" PERFORRATED PVC PER MNDOT 3278 W/ FABRIC SOCK (CRO7H0 SRO�e a m O M p Civil Engineering ^Surveying ^Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 O 0) N N^ m r. U J 'V/ /' A� r O />I� ATW m (A 2 �: m o o J (D OZ3 2 ma (D ^E^,, W �_ (D O 2 2 4) J C: (D � O r V 4) 0CD s 'O^ U LU O D_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. /*:; Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION CIVIL DETAILS C503 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. PLANT SCHEDULE TREES QTY COMMON / BOTANICAL NAME CONT 20 Green Mountain Sugar Maple / Acer saccharum 'Green Mountain' TM 2.5" Cal. B&B 0 49 Autumn Blaze Maple / Acer x freemanii 'Jeffsred' TM 2.5" Cal. B&B 0 46 Imperial Honey Locust / Gleditsia triacanthos inermis 'Impcole' TM 2.5" Cal. B&B 5 Burr Oak / Quercus macrocarpa 2.5" Cal. B&B 17 Regal Prince Oak / Quercus x warei 'Long' TM 2.5" Cal. B&B 0 29 American Sentry Linden / Tilia americans 'MCKSentry' TM 2.5 Cal. B&B 28 Harvest Gold Linden / Tilia cordata x mongolica 'Harvest Gold' 2.5" Cal. B&B t.J 34 Cathedral Elm / Ulmus x'Cathedral' 2.5" Cal. B&B LEGEND SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (UNDER TREES) LAWN - SOD, SALT TOLLERANT �.�.�.�.�.+.+. SEED TYPE 1 - MNDOT 33-261 STORMWATER SOUTH & +++++++++++++ WEST, PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL ' ' ' ' + + + SPECIFICATIONS (2014) SEED TYPE 2 - MNDOT 35-221 DRY PRAIRIE, PER i MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014) SEED TYPE 3 - MNDOT 25-131 TURF, PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014) SEED TYPE 4 - MNDOT 34-181 WETLAND EMERGENT, PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014) PROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES SPECIES DIVERSITY NO % CATHEDRAL ELM 34 14.9% HARVESY GOLD LINDEN 28 12.3% SENTRY LINDEN 29 12.7% AUTUMN BLAZE MAPLE 49 21.5% GREEN MOUNTAIN MAPLE 20 8.8% BUR OAK S 2.2% REGAL PRINCE OAK 17 7.5% IMPERIAL HONEYLOCUST 46 20.2% TOTAL 228 100.0% LANDSCAPE NOTES: I I � I _- - - - - - - I I S89°2946 1319.69 ------------------------- /-/- / / -/-� / L-� /-------�---- E F-------- BLOCK 4 ■ EOi - / _-- /--- __-_-_- / - _ - - - ---- ___---__-____ __----___--__ _--_ -- -_-_ - - / % I I z___ _� - - - - -/- - - -/ I -- WETLANDD1 f ` -_---- -0 -/ / _ 10,900S OCR 2 A===- -/' r I _ ' Al _ I 3 \ / \ / / W / - - - - -LAND H _ / I/--------- DRAWINGS. i i I d ♦ - -_ _- - _ / / I I �� / / V� ___ _ ♦ �� + + -- 7. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL i I I ` \ - / a ♦ 0M� + + ++_-_ Jv ....�. _ _ _-_- -� ,� �. O ACCEPTANCE. l*+ + = i l I ♦ j / 8. REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE N 5 I / �. �. 4 / + CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. I / \ I + ++ 9. SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED I + - - /�' 1 ♦♦ /� I I + `1"' +++} FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. N + O + / _ m ♦ - -- 1 / _-_ - r I F + + + + + -_-_ j++ ++ r+ + / +- ++ - - DITCH 7 ' t + + + +-- WETLAND A O I 63,656 SF + + _ I I CO / o ++ ++ ++ ++ + \ + I + + + O + i I x-/ + + `- - � + +l22 - - -J i Lo ,J --__-_ �--__ - Z PRUNE AS FIELD DIRECTED BY THE LANDSCAPE I I �_ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ ___ ARCHITECT TO IMPROVE APPEARANCE (RETAIN I I I ° _- -_ - _- - - - _ ++ + NORMAL TREE SHAPE I I I , h - _ - -_ _--_-_ ♦ ■ ■ ■ ■ /++ + THREE 2"X4"X8' WOODEN STAKES, STAINED BROWN I �0� / / ! / - - _�- V WITH TWO STRANDS OF WIRE TWISTED TOGETHER. I / / + _ _ _ STAKES SHALL BE PLACED AT 120 TO ONE ANOTHER. / I / ,,pig, �' j Cl)- ++ ++__ -_r_ /� Z r N WIRE SHALL BE THREADED THROUGH NYLON /� - __ I �+ ++__ -_t I STRAPPING WITH GROMMETS. ALTERNATE STABILIZING Et / I - - /++ +___ =-t O W i 0 �II (� METHODS MAY BE PROPOSED BY CONTRACTOR. o _ _ / a / + + ? "+�- O N - / + �- m / ++ TRUNK FLARE JUNCTION: PLANT TREE 1"-2" ABOVE r�1 - / / / l _ _ / ++ +=_ _ 11 >1 EXISTING GRADE ++ +' + / II = W s= COMPACT BOTTOM OF PIT, TYP. i = ° r /++ +i /�1 I MFZ> CUT AND REMOVE BURLAP FROM TOP 1/3 OF ROOT I _ _ - �_ _ _ _ - 1 - - - - j I ++ +}_ _-� / / U Q ----- CQ > BALL. IF NON -BIODEGRADABLE, REMOVE COMPLETELY I -- -- - ° W / +*----� BACKFILL AS SPECIFIED o _-__- MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF I o = - PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ROCK OR ORGANIC i _ j _ MULCH, SEE GENERAL LANDSCAPE NOTES AND PLAN i - WETLAND F = > NOTES FOR MULCH TYPE. KEEP MULCH MIN. 2" FROM I -- - 16,078SF c PLANT TRUNK EXISTING GRADE I / SLOPE SIDES OF HOLE OR VERTICAL SIDES AT EDGE OF PLANTING BED A it RULE OF THUMB - MODIFY EXCAVATION BASED ON LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL AND DESIGN OF BEDS _THREE TIMES WIDTH OR OVERALL PLANT PLACEMENT I I m OF ROOTBALL DECIDUOUS & CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING ' I � I N T S I - - I I , (CRO7H0 SRO�e (Ki� Q O M p Civil Engineering ^ Surveying • Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 1. WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH (MINIMUM AFTER INSTALLATION AND/OR TOP DRESSING OPERATIONS) OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. 2. ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK. 3. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD. 4. UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 5. CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR TWO (2) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE. 6. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4" LAYER TOPSOIL AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE / WETLAN�XX I II Ole .41 ' I fj � ET E I � / I F ' I / E GFE= r 92 I o Ri _ 91 916.31 914.dfi 0�A/ --.-- T Inv=905 7 CBR v� Rim=919.12 III nv=916.02 Nv= /915. r'1SMH V= im=921.9 915.82 ). j / SMH Rim=9 95 I I I I I + + + + + _-- =1 11 V O _ - r + -- __ AI 0 +1 + + + +- J 0 G9 - - ''A, - + + + ---= I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, ?'0 \ I -_- -_-I SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS r - - - - - - -- _ �/ / I �_ PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT WETLAND D2 -_ _ _-_- I � _ SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY / LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER 1= = WETLAND G I / - _-_-_-__ _ _ -_- THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. 16,910 SF I - __ _______= WETLAND _ _ -%� / I 910.14 �/ 58,590 SF �+ -�--_---__-" I / I �� KEVINTE P N + + + \ - DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 26980 + + + + t / I + ++ ,� \ on -_ _ _ _ _ -/1 I ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY + / / I DATE DESCRIPTION + ++++ \ �O • - ° 12/4/20 CITY SUBMITTAL lot �� ♦ A, l A, A, WETLAND E 67,678SF / 3 4 _ A, A, A -- A, A, A,01 001v of _ 01V I \ __- //-�/ sF� i - - - -- - / / 0 �VWETU OC� 1 83 6 SF �g3 ZAP / /r s H - - - - - - N89040'02"E 1320.5 _ Rim=919.12 � � x x x 914.50 9 " 2 907.64 �_ _ _ - - PROJECT NUMBER: 1830EVIEWED BY: mp, kt REVISION SUMMARY �-❑_-❑� � � I / DATE DESCRIPTION I / \ LOW FLOOR=920.00 / ♦ ' LOW FLOOR=918.50 LOW FLOOR=919.70 / ♦ / // /♦ LOW FLOOR=918.00 a verif per LOW FLOOR=919.00 / / / \ LOW FLOOR=918.50 (per lot cert, verify) y) cert, verify) OVERALL (per lot cert, verify) LANDSCAPE PLAN __---I--___ �♦ 1 ; a a N Know what's below. 1" = 80'-0" Call before you dig. nmnm%mmmmmmmm� Ll 00 40'-0" 0 80'-0" QQ COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. SEED TYPE 2 _ _ _ J = i + + _ _ 1 I � � W + � \ \ � a SEED TYPE 4 I � � ° / + � (TYP.) i ' a (TYP.) I I /+ + + + 4- w + I L - \ 6 I SEED TYPE 3 + + o_ - - -_ - - N ' T +Ul) SEED TYPE 4 � _ I ----- \ \ - -_ _ I• + � - _ I -SEED (TYP.) - \ i I/+ + +- - I / j TYPE 2 - - -_- LIMITS OF I � - � alllc � - � - � � `� � - • SEED TYPE 3 I � + +-� 1 / I / (TYP.) CONSTRUCTION I -- r- _ TYP. I + I WETLAND F I + -� +1 16,078 SF \ - I / + + - � SEED TYPE,,,;2 / -_ _ _1 I' -� -/-/ (TYP.) / ^ — ?i L ED TYPE TYP. - - -_- SEED TYPE 4 - I /+ + + _ i / II TYPESEED 1 \ ( )� - - - (TYP.) �. IB 7 /+ _ i / / I II (TYP.) I , -- \ - SEED TYPE / / +-- � (TYP.) / _ + -+ I I �-- + S$6 } / I � + SEED TYPE 3 I - \ A0 \ \/ —� r - - - - - (TYP.) ^ SEED TYPE 2 ` \ — I SEED TYPE 3 (7�fP.) (TYP.) \ \ _- W ETLAND- D2- � 3T74-S€ 00 -_ SEED TYPE WETLAND (( G \ \ I I I / /------ ------' I/ Ijll 16,910 SF \ \ 1 I - -' 2 of Woods ------ co - G - - - - - \ LIMITS OF - 910.14 � — C@NSTRUCTIONL \ ' I I` _��_�_ - - -_-_-_ I_-_ 1 ` s6, _ SEED TYPE 1.) • / IM + + + _ -Wire Fence i i — — — ' + + \lo\ ^ - lo ++ SB_2 + \ SEED TYPE - — — —— ++ + 1 (TYP.) I I I ++ • 1 , I + I two \ / ,� SEED TYPE 3 1 — \ \ I t (TYP.) _ _ _ r / I SEED TYPE 4 — — OWN r. ^ 1 •to I \ / SEED TYPE TYP? i SB-5 / l - - - - /I �'�1I I I (TYP.) I > > • +*� \ �/ �/ l ====ill I�'1 /l o SEED TYPE 3 (TYP.) SEED TYPE 4 IN, -� E 1 WETLAND ESEED M 5 / __ (TYP.) QQ), l - - - it �'/ I (TYP.) 2 / 1 67,678 SF M I � '3 1 I ■� _ � � - 1 / � SEED TYPI \ � l l --_ -�-_- l �l � � ; � LIMITS OF I I I 1 4_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ = I l I / CONSTRUCTION IU° I ----- / TYP. / - -- - r / ja'°25 j - EEDTYPE3 � -_-� i _ _ li (TYP.) Vol�` = SEED TYPE 4 ` \'��� ,s ___(TYP.)V 1'u ' O i TELE � Ii I I I Ov�� � ���� P SEED TYPE )rive I O�`K r� 216 S LIMITS OF LIMITS OF QL $J �II ��;,I �' � v ° I l CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION 11 m - - - - - - - - - - N89°40'02"E 1320.77 "v SMH / EOF /907.7 INV- — — — — — I Rim=919.12 LIMITS OF �� —" 914.50 LIMITS OF I / 907.64 CONSTRUCTION/ CONSTRUCTION i 918.92 ' I I -----Wire Fence I I I I WETLAND X\ '§ 9 .59 I — % 14 I I LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION _ �sEED TXPE 3 I 1 + 919.69 I (TYP.) — — � ' I I I r922.o0HP \-919.77 �, 37 I ' ' I .97 \� loom E � LIMITS OF CON TION SEED TYPE 3 (TYP.) ET w o I i / U I u z° I u25 / I E Water Tower I a p° I I I II i 119.16 \ - Gravel Drive I I I I— /LOW OcS5\ \ I I— I---- I 11 \ SMH — Rim=919.67 S IM Ri 1117905.17 CBR I Rim=919.12 Inv=916.02 0 0LANDSCAPE NOTES: RR7HO � 1. WHERE SHOWN, SHRUB & PERENNIAL BEDS SHALL BE MULCHED WITH 4" DEPTH (MINIMUM AFTER LP Civil Engineering ^Surveying ^Landscape Architecture INSTALLATION AND/OR TOP DRESSING OPERATIONS) OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 2. ALL TREES SHALL BE MULCHED WITH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO OUTER EDGE OF St. Louis Park, MN 55416 SAUCER OR TO EDGE OF PLANTING BED, IF APPLICABLE. ALL MULCH SHALL BE KEPT WITHIN A civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 MINIMUM OF 2" FROM TREE TRUNK. 3. PLANT MATERIALS SHALL CONFORM WITH THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS AND SHALL BE OF HARDY STOCK, FREE FROM DISEASE, DAMAGE AND DISFIGURATION. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING PLUMPNESS OF PLANT MATERIAL FOR DURATION OF ACCEPTANCE PERIOD. 4. UPON DISCOVERY OF A DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITY OF PLANTS SHOWN ON THE SCHEDULE AND THE QUANTITY SHOWN ON THE PLAN, THE PLAN SHALL GOVERN. 5. CONDITION OF VEGETATION SHALL BE MONITORED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT THROUGHOUT THE DURATION OF THE CONTRACT. LANDSCAPE MATERIALS PART OF THE CONTRACT SHALL BE WARRANTED FOR TWO (2) FULL GROWING SEASONS FROM SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION DATE. 6. ALL AREAS DISTURBED BY CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL RECEIVE 4" LAYER TOPSOIL AND SOD AS SPECIFIED UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ON THE DRAWINGS. 7. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE WATERED AND MAINTAINED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE. 8. REPAIR AT NO COST TO OWNER ALL DAMAGE RESULTING FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. 9. SWEEP AND MAINTAIN ALL PAVED SURFACES FREE OF DEBRIS GENERATED FROM LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR'S ACTIVITIES. �� �CQ �O O� V LEGEND SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (UNDER TREES) O LAWN - SOD, SALT TOLLERANT N N SEED TYPE 1 - MNDOT 33-261 STORMWATER SOUTH & LO ++++++++++++++ WEST, PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL LLO +`+'+'+'+'+'++ SPECIFICATIONS (2014) z SEED TYPE 2 - MNDOT 35-221 DRY PRAIRIE, PER 2 i� MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014) �, O _N SEED TYPE 3 - MNDOT 25-131 TURF, PER MNDOT (a SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014) co _ _ _ _ _ SEED TYPE 4 - MNDOT 34-181 WETLAND EMERGENT, z r (3)PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS _LD (2014) O o J (D �Z3 0 PROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE 2 (D 1= AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES N ma ME > m / _0 O O 0 � 1� O O s F- FM U W O 0-I D_ I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. ,�:��,_ '. KEVIN TEPPIIEN DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 26980 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY 1� 1 0 0 Know what's below. Call before you dig. DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE PLAN Ll ■ © COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. I I I dI -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------LIMITS-F LIMITS OF SEED TYPE 2 (TYP.) CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION ----------- --- -- -- �- ---- -- -- -- --- ---- -- °�,-1�.G9. ---- --- - -- ---- --- ---- ------ //j, I J II -I----------�-�--- ___F'�--`SEED TYPE3 --_--_-_-___-___-_ I II 1I I i/ -_ -(TYP.) -------- - - - - -- N - -I- - - - - - - -- -- --- - I _� V& -'\ SEED TYPE 2 (TYP.) _ l / , - - / - - - - / 000 ♦ / L I I SEED TYP 3 - i / - - - - -i / (TY .) / - / LIMITS OF _ �� CONSTRUCTION 3-------------- - / Q) ' l ---- - _-_-i/ SEED TYPE 4 / TYP. / `�►------_ / �� N / -----WE7LANDH--- (TYP.) L -- JL �M° \ ---- - -- -- / - N G / Z +) \ _ ` / + - _ I i I II o `w `��l+SEEDTYPE 3 + + (TYP.) r------ ---�- -- + I I I EED TYPE 3 4 `♦ / // /� + I I W ( SEED TYPE 2 TYP. `d4 � (TYP. + / — - h + SB 9 + / Xi i SEED TYPE 3 (TYP.) �' ► - ta- I \ + ` I / - / SEED TYPE 2 I I --y -- + + i �� SEED TYPE 1 (TYP.) - - - - - 1 0 / + + / (TYP.) _ i - -------- - ---- - - - - - - - - - - - + + ` SEED TYPE 1 (TYP.) - � + + + / + + +WIN + -� ti j - DITCH 7 + 'm` + + + + :� / + + + - --Edge of Water _ _ - -- + I WETLAND A + + �O ' I / + - - ----- - - ___ 1 i - 63656SF � �_- / - I \ SEED TYPE 1 TYP. E co + - + — + + ++ III `� ++ + I i + +-- I I I U ,uc 4- + + r + 4j + + + O + — \ I I w + + s - — i + 1r),) ` SEED TYPE 4 - - _-- + _'% + + ---0 O / � (TYP.) - > ++ + 00— --- — — ) - \ I + _� LIMITS OF \� + + + I CONSTRUCTION ----- / �/ , _ % / + / S� / /� - . F .v� — — — - i j - ft 7 —SEED TYPE 2 _ _ (TYP.) - - - M - o p p - - I SEED TYPE 4 _- I (TYP.) ----- LIMITS OF CONSTRUCTION S WETLAND F �� \ I _ - 16,078 SF I � + SEED TYPE,,, 1.1 SEED TYPE 2 ` (TYP.) + 4 / L ED TYPE - v1 Cb /+ + S B-8 + +_ + '- i/+ +- + I V + + _ Ln - Lu- i /+ + ry) + I I Sib / + + a - + _ ° SEED TYPE 4 + \ a I i + ,� \ (TYP.) + l w I/+ + - ° w / + SEED TYPE 3 + + + +-�- - i li o + \ - / + + �, I + + I- I I+ -F - - I I SEED \ — — — I • I/+ + + / / TYPE 2 \ - . SEED TYPE 3 I + +-_ _ =i / I (TYP.) WETL ND 8 G = r (TYP.) I '" + + - +-r _/ I I I 58,59 SF \- _ (. • + + +_ _ = i I SEED LEGEND SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH (UNDER TREES) LAWN - SOD, SALT TOLLERANT ...`.`.`.`.. SEED TYPE 1 - MNDOT 33-261 STORMWATER SOUTH & +****** WEST, PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL �+++++. + SPECIFICATIONS (2014) SEED TYPE 2 - MNDOT 35-221 DRY PRAIRIE, PER i MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014) SEED TYPE 3 - MNDOT 25-131 TURF, PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014) SEED TYPE 4 - MNDOT 34-181 WETLAND EMERGENT, PER MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL SPECIFICATIONS (2014) PROPOSED CANOPY TREE SYMBOLS - SEE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN FOR SPECIES AND PLANTING SIZES (CRO7H0 SRO�e a m O M p Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 O N N L0 E _0) ♦0 V � N Z LD J 0 (D 2 � � —_ Q O O O o 0 s (0 FM 0 W 0 IL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KEVIN TEPPIIEN DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 26980 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION LANDSCAPE PLAN 000� NOTES & DETAILS � N Know what's below. 1" = 50'-0" Call before you dig. 25'-0" 0 50'-0" Ll ■ 2 Q COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. SWPPP NOTES: 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 2. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY THE CITY. 3. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. 4. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES. 5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. CITY OF HUGO EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES. LEGEND: EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL 1137 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL on DRAINAGE ARROW ■■�■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■■ SILT FENCE/BIOROLL- GRADING LIMIT ■ ■ INLET PROTECTION STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EROSION CONTROL BLANKET ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, AND MEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. k6 \ PERIMETER EROSION -914_ a \ CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTION I �\ LIMITS, TYP. �6 1�---914---/ 1 l S89°29'4�' I �319.69 % --- I� I / V, 1l \ 5�� PERIMETER III ' / \ \ — \ /�� s�\�— /� r r <11A III \�/ � � --I" .\ I I I I `� � EROSION I CONTROL AT I 1 i I �// :\�\� \ �, I �\ / / \ — \1' �; \ / 7 r \/ /I CONSTRUCTION ETL D1 // �_/ — LIMITS, TYP. I( Iw losoos ♦\\ \\ \,/ 1 1 �' / // / i // 4' ;WE (DI CHweTLASD� 2D)/ 00 1 ✓ \\ --------- \ / \ / / / j/�% \\� 914--- r Elm \ ✓ A/� tERIMETER 1 I I wv / / �\ -� �--- \ \ \ Ii'I I / Gi/� ��� `��EOSION I ) \\ ` A"ONTROL Al WETLAND 21247SF ' 15 CONSTRUCTION / ?r ----91�\ `�` LIMITS, TYP. X I I I \ \ \ \ .r�_91�� / J/i— i n i r l l I I = \ \ \ \ WETLANDA / \ 1 `�7� \\ �j7� (\/I/17, ,— I 63,656 SF / ' ) v v i '9j \', 11IT II ET 12 91 h / / \ / \\`. ILA s,�--- \1 / \ _-_� \ wE 12_100 \ \\� \ / — —1" / W 12 99 I \ \ el/ \\ \\ i IIIII `'ERl /IET_ WET 12—ems I / I g\a / \ 1 �r IIIIII ERO�IONQ f ,� \ \I �/ / 1 \ \ ET 12_97 1111I11 (tONTRC h �, cb \ / '' � \ \ / \\ II IAT \ \ / \ \g, � II IIIIII ( 014ISTRUCTOON / \ PERIMETE �i I�I W \ PERIMETER —"� \1 \ / / / /- ' \\`\ - IIII I / I IIII �II111III I IWrI , TYP/ / Lu \\\ 9 / /r� �� EROSION Ln \ CONTROL A� / ,00\ I I ( „ I CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTI N/ n \ \ �I I IJ1III11 'IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII II I I oOLIMITS, T LIMITS, TYP. WET N I �wr�CAND F �a3�� 16,078 SF x WET \ \ \ \ \\ \� j \ \ / I I I I Ilpll 11 1 / A \\ J-I_ WET 1_79ditch \ \ \ / / \\I // if II IIII I \ \ I I \\ \ i 1 ,a,s-_ `\'�\ I �°� � 11 I►�L_ -Jul'>=1_.� - - � `-- / /_-------_\ \ 11—\\ 97 \ \\ T E ET B J/ // \� / I // I olI y j� I \ 4 2 I a /WET I �r==� \--\\ \\ �'� \ \ \ \T 161P3 \ WE I 5' 91 \ /�s \\ ET 12�28 P'� �--- �— \ \ - / 1 � �I 11 rl. cb \ \ �_-,_ I ,✓ �- — — —� I \ \ \ \ WET �1 _� -9q I+ III �g / >( WET l I J LAND- 0` 45 m WETLAND G 0 16,910SF ET 140\ \ I PERIMETER E�SIO�WET T 12_gj s=o CONTROL AT CONSTAUCTII � wFT1242/ ryI.I�I Iy�I IIIII I,IIIIIIILI�L-�✓ ��-�// /%//��/ /ia/_ -/ ETLAND / s tIMlf,S��q, l WET 158,590SF ET/1243 `— / /> \ \ I --Wire FenceTSB 12 LAND \ —� I\ I'�♦ W T 12_69 y // // +'' 11`�4UP / / / ----/ / l I / / ;J18 WET 2 WET 12_68 / \ \ \ / 1 I SRO I OTI 1 T / � / i/ -� //` / 1 ; � � � � �, ' I'P.ERMEy�R WET 12_67 v V/ �\ — \ I h / I / /WET 12_66 \ / /. / / l / 1 Ilflll OL \ \ \ ET E I/ \�__ �_-91`�'/ 1 / // j/ I / /_914- /� \ � IIIII � � \ / \ \� ET / f / I / III Q'O SjR CTION \ / � / / I' \ f \ � / / J f lll��ll� /'�IN�T I P. 1\a I � \9 �� �� ► �2'r/ �\ I \/ _ / / / if I - `� l / 1 I /11 /� � �— =\—\� — L — — — - \ 2 I \ I �l/�\r/.� r. ♦ �l I /�1 \ / / / I �����I( l � _ ' �/i ,,[ t _ i / I I WETLAND E l• \ \ \ \ M \ "♦ 67,678 SF \ ET I I I , / I � � \ � I I I �--' �\ ERIM R W .. ♦ .. .. I / , I I� CO 6 QNPb O C I I \/�2� \°T 1 \ % '� �I 9' / li ll�l l I — / m I, -= I (METER 1 / / i I 41 I I `' �/ E RANC_E �I 11 C NST CTIO I i I // // // �ER4SION- / I/ / /I�I%�/I��I\ l� I i I I N a $ I I / / 1g / I I \ / \ 1 1 f4f / I \ \ I WET ND 10/13 IN POTEC N I4 1 L�MIT / II I - /� / / ONTROL AT I t_ I - II \ �� \ ( - 20, assF � I \ / / I I r31 �- \ \ l \ / it / I f I � \ \ / \ \ <-, \ \/ CH ASINS PII I I / /Y �� ONSTRUCTI©N �\ \ �-� \\� �I L._ i \ \ X Il/ 11 �� �� I�j \-, \ \� YFe"ce - LIMITS, TYP. _ . I — \-1\/R\ - \\ \\ / I I \ \ Rim=919.1'2 / I� p1r�� -- -- /j// �� \�-_\ XPiEFa11®BY /1'32 �\3�7��1913'--r�l Inr=s16. 9 Fd",Q PRO fI I \ \ / / / / //�_ \\\\ \.9> RO ON / \\ \_-- -�1�� lIl l� / �T�P €�TIOT ALL \ �� �\___ __ / /� �11 \ // /---------------- _ DOVN�I �iQtTCH \ // 1 / / / /, � — --���% ONSTft, �TI\ IHv \� BAST �9 \\ �� / I / / __� LIMIT \\\ ��/ \) I 1// llf 1� / �\�\\ ���SMH n //��// -9 / \ / 915.82 / / sM S r�---- /. 92\� s�1 / Rim—922.95 1 \ .9 UD N ` \\ \ !•/ / �/// � \ — \- — 159TH ST-�T (A Public�R/VV) � I (Width V ries) ---�— / lll�� III \ dD I \ IIIIII \\ \\ \\ IIIIII f 1 IIIIIII IIIII _, , 1 f IIIIII Iljll,� I I IIII I I Id 0 0 Know what's below. Call before you dig. COR7 R 0H SO� a G3 ( M p Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 N � a' O V O v O CO HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. _ F ) 0 Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SWPPP -EXISTING CONDITIONS swi 0 ■ © COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. SWPPP NOTES: I 1. ALL EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS SHOWN ARE APPROXIMATE. CONTACT ALL SPECIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES, AND "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (651-454-0002 OR 800-252-1166) FOR UTILITY MEASURES CONTAINED IN THIS SWPPP ARE THE MINIMUM LOCATIONS, 48 HOURS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. THE CONTRACTOR REQUIREMENTS. ADDITIONAL PRACTICES MAY BE REQUIRED DURING I I SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE ANY UTILITIES THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING THE COURSE OF CONSTRUCTION. CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. I PERIMETER EROSION I 2. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN ONE ACRE AND WILL REQUIRE 91 k6 CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTION AN MPCA NPDES PERMIT. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING ANY EROSION CONTROL PERMITS REQUIRED BY LIMITS, TYP. ----I---------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------�--- ------------- THE CITY. S89029'46" 1319.69 -----i— 9,�----------- — 3. SEE SHEETS SW1.0 - SW1.5 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL NOTES, > > 4 > F —> DESCRIPTIONS, AND PRACTICES. i 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ — _ _ _ 10 10. 918 Z I -5 I 1 N 4. SEE GRADING PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL GRADING AND EROSION PERIMETER I aL�G� r I 2 / _ ■ / ' N CONTROL NOTES. EROSION 3 CONTROLXT r 5. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION, I k I N T PR CTIO 4 a INSPECTIONS, AND COMPLIANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT. CONSTRUCTION 1 W E0,900S D1 LIMITS, TIIP. Cr 1 ITY OF HUGO EROSION CONTROL NOTES: RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES. LEGEND: I I I \ N I I m / N f— (CRO7H0 SRO�e a m O M p Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 Im `'- ` ♦♦ 3 / / PERIMETER Q- ,` v /� ♦ 9 / 4 I 5 / a EROSION Q 0 CONTROL AT �;K CONSTRUCTION C� F� N o ' LIMITS, TYP. mo I A` yr /---_ Edge of Water — — — 113 EX. 1' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL i _ I / DITCH 7 — �— ---- O � soa m - ------- ------------------------- 7 1.0' CONTOUR ELEVATION INTERVAL i �, — — � wW r, WETLAND .. - I r\ 63,656 SF � DRAINAGE ARROW I � C0 C\I ■■ SILT FENCE / BIOROLL GRADING LIMIT sg o ' a I CV I I w v �, •__ a, —_ i 6 ■ ■ INLET PROTECTION i I w — — -PLACE EROSION - �, _ $�i$Sg i �■■� _ CONTROL BLANT`�;- - =� i CL Z ---'ON ALL SLOPES 4:1 OR i }& STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE I — — STEEPER 77P. / U N %(MNDOT C ECY 3) / II C > ��asos I'I EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 0 I I — LG o PERIMETER "' o J EROSION M O 91B> i - - I m Ijj CONTROL AT _ a) CONSTRUCTION w > PERIMETER e � � PE 1 LIMITS, TYP. � ��_ EROSION I - I + \ - - w I ' `) o o III I \ \ N I 830 0 0_ o CONTROL AT Ln I TRO gWgWq�WW� I I o CONSTRUCTION 0 ST \ \ \ - - j ! 1 z a I _(D LIMITS, TYP. I (n N I WETL ND8 .� AllY I P A \ \ I CO) WETLAND F � 3 �O r I I j 58,59 SF 0 CD i � \ $ ~ \ 11 o � 0 �j, w 4$ \ \ \ e18 , , I I I' I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY \ ETLAND 774 SF I ' LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER IT-� IZ \ < I I - UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF WETLAN G T CT O I Ico MINNESOTA. — — 16,910 SF AST H I m I ` �jV01 PERIMETER EROSION I BA I S, T W - - CONTROL AT CONSTRUCTION I I "' S \ 6925 II ` I' = / WETLANDS I I LIMITS, TYP. 910-14 ��// 58,590SF Matthew R. Pavek cm DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 \wireFence — — , AJ ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY / W LAND X DATE DESCRIPTION _ \ b I — � e� — — I 12/4/20 CITY SUBMITTAL r Tti \ PERIMETER 12/13/20 REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL EROSION 12/23/20 REVISED CITY SUBMITTAL + Aid S Y — — — — — — — — - _CONTROL AT 0 • L \ \ �ry — — I � e 'B CONSTRUCTION 1/5/20 WATERSHED SUBMITTAL 1/26/21 CITY RESUBMITTAL /�� e� I ' ! LIMITS, TYP. 4 - E 2 5 azo mo W I , 67,678 SF 3 \ o PLACE EROSION PERIMETER a `=m r CONTROL BLANKET CONSTRUCTION - EROSION CONTROL I.Uz I I I a P RIMETER = '� 2 \ / AT CONSTRUCTION I025 -r a ON ALL SLOPES 4:1 OR � ENTRANCE Iao ,R©SION- 0� \ ' STEEPER TYP. oI �� INLET PROTECTION AT LIMITS, ' ,1a I OUN ' " -� 0� P e MNDOT CATEGORY 3 WETLY ND10/13 SF� ( ) 20, 49 SF i q CATCH BASINS, TYP I 00 C® TFUCTI©N 6 -�- - - ---� - -ICI- '� 1 m s �' l83' IMITS, TYP. s6 x - -- -- -- } NV \ , SMH x x x- PERIMETEFV 'E 1320.�5 2 ` DRAWN BY:m kt REVIEWED BY: m kt CBR Rfm-91912 � 914 50 907 64 p p 915. v= l4J 915.82 ) I�N� Q� Rim=9 95 I R1m=9,9.1 CONTRACTOR TO PROVI E / � � � EROSION t / Inv=916.0 / PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 INLET PROTECTION AT ALL CONTROL AT / REVISION SUMMARY DOWN STREAV,CATCH s / �� , �' CONSTRUCT[O - - / / DATE DESCRIPTION LIMITS, TYP % / \ I LOW FLOOR=920.00 I I nA1 FI nnR=91G 7n 0 Id 0 0 a Know what's below. Call before you dig. SWPPP - PROPOSED CONDITIONS swi ■ © COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. P ASSEMBLY ox SUPPORT NET: 12 GAUGE 4" x 4" URB WIRE HOOKED ONTO — PREFORMED CHANNELS ON POSTS AS SPECIFIED. NOTES: 1. THE ROAD DRAIN-CLIRB & GUTTER MODEL CONSISTS OF A REUSABLE OPEN TOPPED RECEPTACLE THAT SETS INSIDE THE STORM SEWER GRATE. AN INCORPORATION REAR DEFLECTOR PLATE IS CONNECTED TO THE RECEPTACLE DIRECTING THE WATER INTO THE BASIN FOR FILTRATION. 2. THE ROAD DRAIN -CURB & GUTTER MODEL HAS A REPLACEABLE FILTER CARTRIDGE. 3. THE FILTER MEDIA SHALL MEET ALL LOCAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR INLET PROTECTION. MAINTENANCE- I- CHECK FILTER MEDIA AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. CLEAN OR REPLACE IF SEDIMENT CLOGS FILTER. 2. REMOVE SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS FROM THE RECEPTACLE AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT. CITY OF EST. 1906 TO CONSTRUCTION AREA 61K, WIMCO CURB & GUTTER INLET PROTECTION (CG23) 30' FROM EDGE OF ROAD TO FRONT OF SPEED BUMP Special Details 04-ot-15 ha—M HU-EC-4 03-12-20 35' R PLAN 35' R TO CONSTRUCTION AREA 6" MIN CRUSHED STONE 75' MINIMUM FINISHED GRADE PROFILE FABRIC LE FILTER 4" HIGH, 18" WIDE SPEED BUMP IS W EXISTING UNDISTURBED ROADWAY NOTES: 1. PROVIDE APPROPRIATE TRANSITION BETWEEN STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AND UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. 2. THE ENTRANCE SHALL BE MAINTAINED IN A CONDITION WHICH WILL PREVENT TRACKING OR FLOWING OF SEDIMENT ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY. THIS MAY REQUIRE PERIODIC TOP DRESSING WITH ADDITIONAL STONE OR ADDING STONE TO THE LENGTH OF THE ENTRANCE. 3. REPAIR AND CLEANOUT MEASURES USED TO TRAP SEDIMENT. 4. ALL SEDIMENT SPILLED, DROPPED, WASHED, OR TRACKED ONTO UNDISTURBED ROADWAY SHALL BE REMOVED AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. 5. FINAL LOCATION AND INSTALLATION SHALL BE COORDINATED WITH THE CITY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. 6. CRUSHED STONE SHALL BE 1-1/2" DIA. CLOSE GRADED, AND IN ACCORDANCE TO MNDOT SECTION 2118. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION ACCESS N T S EXISTING GROUND SURFACE FILTER FABRIC WITH WIRE SUPPORT NET AS SPECIFIED. METAL POST AS SPECIFIED. FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED SECURE TO WIRE SUPPORT NET WITH METAL CLIPS 12"O.C. cli III ANCHOR SOIL, TAMP BACKFH ILL CARRY WIRE SUPPORT NET DOWN INTO TRENCH �T N SEDIMENT FENCE N T S DIRECTION OF FLOW 6" 'B, TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10" SPACING, 4" DOWN FROM TRENCH � � r 'C' OVERLAP: BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN 'A' AND'B'. OVERLAP END OF TOP STRIP 4" AND STAPLE. 'D' EROSION STOP: FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SILT TRENCH AND TAMPED. DOUBLEROW OF STAPLES. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. EROSION BLANKET N T S EXISTING GROUND SURFACE METAL POSTS 8'-0" O.C. MAX. 'A' BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING IN A TRENCH 4" OR MORE IN DEPTH 'E' OVERFALL � r NOTE: 1. PLACE STAPLES 2 FEET APART TO KEEP MATTING FIRMLY PRESSED TO SOIL. FILTER FABRIC AS SPECIFIED FILLER AS SPECIFIED TYPICAL STAPLE #8 GAUGE WIRE FILL UPSTREAM BASE EDGE WITH 2" OF DIRT OR COMPOST TO EMBED ROLL. DIRECTION OF FLOW WOODEN STAKES 1/2"X2"X16" MIN. PLACED 10' O.C. WHEN INSTALLED ON GROUND. IF INSTALLED ON PVMT. PROVIDE SANDBAGS BEHIND AND ON TOP AT MIN. 10' O.C. NOTE: 1. COMPOST FILTER LOGS (BIO ROLLS) SHALL BE FILTREXX EROSION CONTROL SOXX OR APPROVED EQUAL. 2. COMPOST FILLER TO BE MADE FROM A COMPOST BLEND 30%-40% GRADE 2 (SPEC 3890) AND 60%-70% PARTIALLY DECOMPOSED WOOD CHIPS, PER MNDOT SPEC 3897. 3. FILTER FABRIC SHALL BE GEOTEXTILE KNITTED MATERIAL WITH MAX. OPENINGS OF 3/811 . 4. IF MULTIPLE ROLLS NEEDED, OVERLAP BY MIN. 12" AT ENDS AND STAKE. 5. SILT SHALL BE REMOVED ONCE IT REACHES 80% OF THE HEIGHT OF THE ROLL OR AS DEEMED NECESSARY BY SITE CONTRACTOR TO MAINTAIN PROPER FUNCTION. SEDIMENT BIO—ROLL / COMPOST FILTER LOG N T S 0 0 0 (C AVR a A � j (�EaoULFD Civil Engineering ^ Surveying o Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 0 LU O Of IL I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SWPPP - DETAILS SW1 02 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP I THE CONTRACTOR AND ALL SUBCONTRACTORS INVOLVED WITH A CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY THAT DISTURBS SITE SOIL OR WHO IMPLEMENT A POLLUTANT CONTROL MEASURE IDENTIFIED IN THE STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) GENERAL PERMIT (DATED AUGUST 1, 2018 # MNR100001) AND ANY LOCAL GOVERNING AGENCY HAVING JURISDICTION CONCERNING EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL. STORMWATER DISCHARGE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH WHAT IS REPRESENTED IN THIS SET OF CONSTRUCTION PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS. SEE THE SWPPP PLAN SHEETS AND SWPPP NARRATIVE (ATTACHMENT A: CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE) FOR ADDITIONAL SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP INFORMATION. THE PLANS SHOW LOCATIONS AND TYPES OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S. STANDARD DETAILS ARE ATTACHED TO THIS SWPPP DOCUMENT. THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IS AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL STABILIZED ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2. INSTALLATION OF SILT FENCE AROUND SITE 3. INSTALL ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCING AROUND INFILTRATION AREAS 4. INSTALL INLET PROTECTION AT ALL ADJACENT AND DOWNSTREAM CATCH BASINS 5. CLEAR AND GRUB FOR TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND INSTALL 6. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN / POND (SECTION 14) 7. CLEAR AND GRUB REMAINDER OF SITE 8. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL 9. ROUGH GRADING OF SITE 10. STABILIZE DENUDED AREAS AND STOCKPILES 11. INSTALL SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN STORM SEWER AND SERVICES 12. INSTALL SILT FENCE / INLET PROTECTION AROUND CB'S 13. INSTALL STREET SECTION 14. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER 15. BITUMINOUS ON STREETS 16. FINAL GRADE BOULEVARD INSTALL SEED AND MULCH 17. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASIN / POND 18. FINAL GRADE POND / INFILTRATION BASINS (DO NOT COMPACT SOILS IN INFILTRATION AREAS.) 19. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED BY EITHER SEED OR SOD/LANDSCAPING, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. RECORDS RETENTION: THE SWPPP (ORIGINAL OR COPIES) INCLUDING, ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION BY THE PERMITTEE WHO HAS OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THAT PORTION OF THE SITE. THE SWPPP CAN BE KEPT IN EITHER THE FIELD OFFICE OR IN AN ON SITE VEHICLE DURING NORMAL WORKING HOURS. ALL OWNER(S) MUST KEEP THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE FOLLOWING ADDITIONAL RECORDS, ON FILE FOR THREE (3) YEARS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT AS OUTLINED IN SECTION 4. THIS DOES NOT INCLUDE ANY RECORDS AFTER SUBMITTAL OF THE NOT. 1. THE FINAL SWPPP; 2. ANY OTHER STORMWATER RELATED PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT; 3. RECORDS OF ALL INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION (SEE SECTION 11, INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE); 4. ALL PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS THAT HAVE BEEN IMPLEMENTED, INCLUDING ALL RIGHT OF WAY, CONTRACTS, COVENANTS AND OTHER BINDING REQUIREMENTS REGARDING PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE; AND 5. ALL REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR DESIGN OF THE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION RESPONSIBILITIES: 1. THE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE PERMITTEE(S) AS IDENTIFIED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL ON -SITE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP INCLUDING THE ACTIVITIES OF ALL OF THE CONTRACTOR'S SUBCONTRACTORS. 3. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A PERSON(S) KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO OVERSEE ALL INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPS AND IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP. 4. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE PERSON(S) MEETING THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES PERMIT TO CONDUCT INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PERMIT. ONE OF THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY MPCA. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TRAINING DOCUMENTATION FOR THESE INDIVIDUAL(S) AS REQUIRED BY THE NPDES PERMIT. THIS TRAINING DOCUMENTATION SHALL BE RECORDED IN OR WITH THE SWPPP BEFORE THE START OF CONSTRUCTION OR AS SOON AS THE PERSONNEL FOR THE PROJECT HAVE BEEN DETERMINED. DOCUMENTATION SHALL INCLUDE: 4.1. NAMES OF THE PERSONNEL ASSOCIATED WITH THE PROJECT THAT ARE REQUIRED TO BE TRAINED PER SECTION 21 OF THE PERMIT. 4.2. DATES OF TRAINING AND NAME OF INSTRUCTOR AND ENTITY PROVIDING TRAINING. 4.3. CONTENT OF TRAINING COURSE OR WORKSHOP INCLUDING THE NUMBER OF HOURS OF TRAINING. 5. FOLLOWING FINAL STABILIZATION AND THE TERMINATION OF COVERAGE FOR THE NPDES PERMIT, THE OWNER IS EXPECTED TO FURNISH LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE 0 & M OF THE PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS SWPPP AMENDMENTS (SECTION 6): 1. ONE OF THE INDIVIDUALS DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.A OR ITEM 21.2.13 OR ANOTHER QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL MUST COMPLETE ALL SWPPP CHANGES. CHANGES INVOLVING THE USE OF A LESS STRINGENT BMP MUST INCLUDE A JUSTIFICATION DESCRIBING HOW THE REPLACEMENT BMP IS EFFECTIVE FOR THE SITE CHARACTERISTICS. 2. PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS HAVING A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER. 3. PERMITTEES MUST AMEND THE SWPPP TO INCLUDE ADDITIONAL OR MODIFIED BMPS AS NECESSARY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED OR ADDRESS SITUATIONS WHENEVER INSPECTIONS OR INVESTIGATIONS BY THE SITE OWNER OR OPERATOR, USEPA OR MPCA OFFICIALS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE IN ELIMINATING OR SIGNIFICANTLY MINIMIZING THE DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS TO SURFACE WATERS OR GROUNDWATER OR THE DISCHARGES ARE CAUSING WATER QUALITY STANDARD EXCEEDANCES (E.G., NUISANCE CONDITIONS AS DEFINED IN MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) OR THE SWPPP IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE OBJECTIVES OF A USEPA APPROVED TMDL. BMP SELECTION AND INSTALLATION (SECTION 7): 1. PERMITTEES MUST SELECT, INSTALL, AND MAINTAIN THE BMPS IDENTIFIED IN THE SWPPP AND IN THIS PERMIT IN AN APPROPRIATE AND FUNCTIONAL MANNER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH RELEVANT MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS AND ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES. EROSION PREVENTION (SECTION 8): 1. BEFORE WORK BEGINS, PERMITTEES MUST DELINEATE THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED. 2. PERMITTEES MUST MINIMIZE THE NEED FOR DISTURBANCE OF PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT WITH STEEP SLOPES. WHEN STEEP SLOPES MUST BE DISTURBED, PERMITTEES MUST USE TECHNIQUES SUCH AS PHASING AND STABILIZATION PRACTICES DESIGNED FOR STEEP SLOPES (E.G., SLOPE DRAINING AND TERRACING). 3. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS, INCLUDING STOCKPILES. STABILIZATION MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION WHEN CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS PERMANENTLY OR TEMPORARILY CEASED ON ANY PORTION OF THE SITE AND WILL NOT RESUME FOR A PERIOD EXCEEDING 14 CALENDAR DAYS. STABILIZATION MUST BE COMPLETED NO LATER THAN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS CEASED. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON CONSTRUCTED BASE COMPONENTS OF ROADS, PARKING LOTS AND SIMILAR SURFACES. STABILIZATION IS NOT REQUIRED ON TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT SILT, CLAY OR ORGANIC COMPONENTS (E.G., CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCKPILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES) BUT PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF THE STOCKPILE. 4. FOR PUBLIC WATERS THAT THE MINNESOTA DNR HAS PROMULGATED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURING SPECIFIED FISH SPAWNING TIME FRAMES, PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITHIN 200 FEET OF THE WATER'S EDGE, AND THAT DRAIN TO THESE WATERS, WITHIN 24 HOURS DURING THE RESTRICTION PERIOD. 5. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF THE LAST 200 LINEAR FEET OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES OR SWALES THAT DRAIN WATER FROM THE SITE WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE STABILIZATION OF REMAINING PORTIONS OF TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER OR PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASES. 6. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES BEING USED AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM DURING CONSTRUCTION (WITH PROPERLY DESIGNED ROCK -DITCH CHECKS, BIO ROLLS, SILT DIKES, ETC.) DO NOT NEED TO BE STABILIZED. PERMITTEES MUST STABILIZE THESE AREAS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER THEIR USE AS A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM CEASES 7. PERMITTEES MUST NOT USE MULCH, HYDROMULCH, TACKIFIER, POLYACRYLAMIDE OR SIMILAR EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES WITHIN ANY PORTION OF THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE SECTION WITH A CONTINUOUS SLOPE OF GREATER THAN 2 PERCENT. 8. PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION AT ALL PIPE OUTLETS WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER OR PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM. 9. PERMITTEES MUST NOT DISTURB MORE LAND (I.E., PHASING) THAN CAN BE EFFECTIVELY INSPECTED AND MAINTAINED IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 11. SEDIMENT CONTROL (SECTION 9): 1. PERMITTEES MUST ESTABLISH SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS ON ALL DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETERS OF THE SITE AND DOWNGRADIENT AREAS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO ANY SURFACE WATER, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES UPGRADIENT OF ANY BUFFER ZONES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE ANY UPGRADIENT LAND -DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN AND MUST KEEP THE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES IN PLACE UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER. 2. IF DOWNGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED, BASED ON FREQUENT FAILURE OR EXCESSIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES OR REDUNDANT BMPS TO ELIMINATE THE OVERLOADING AND AMEND THE SWPPP TO IDENTIFY THESE ADDITIONAL PRACTICES AS REQUIRED IN ITEM 6.3. 3. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCHES AND SEDIMENT BASINS DESIGNED AS PART OF A SEDIMENT CONTAINMENT SYSTEM (E.G., DITCHES WITH ROCK -CHECK DAMS) REQUIRE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ONLY AS APPROPRIATE FOR SITE CONDITIONS. 4. A FLOATING SILT CURTAIN PLACED IN THE WATER IS NOT A SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP TO SATISFY ITEM 9.2 EXCEPT WHEN WORKING ON A SHORELINE OR BELOW THE WATERLINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT TERM CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (E.G., INSTALLATION OF RIP RAP ALONG THE SHORELINE) IN THAT AREA IS COMPLETE, PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL AN UPLAND PERIMETER CONTROL PRACTICE IF EXPOSED SOILS STILL DRAIN TO A SURFACE WATER. 5. PERMITTEES MUST RE -INSTALL ALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES ADJUSTED OR REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITIES SUCH AS CLEARING OR GRUBBING, OR PASSAGE OF VEHICLES, IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS COMPLETED. PERMITTEES MUST RE -INSTALL SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICES BEFORE THE NEXT PRECIPITATION EVENT EVEN IF THE SHORT-TERM ACTIVITY IS NOT COMPLETE. 6. PERMITTEES MUST PROTECT ALL STORM DRAIN INLETS USING APPROPRIATE BMPS DURING CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THEY ESTABLISH PERMANENT COVER ON ALL AREAS WITH POTENTIAL FOR DISCHARGING TO THE INLET. 7. PERMITTEES MAY REMOVE INLET PROTECTION FOR A PARTICULAR INLET IF A SPECIFIC SAFETY CONCERN (E.G. STREET FLOODING/FREEZING) IS IDENTIFIED BY THE PERMITTEES OR THE JURISDICTIONAL AUTHORITY (E.G., CITY/COUNTY/TOWNSHIP/MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ENGINEER). PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE NEED FOR REMOVAL IN THE SWPPP. 8. PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE SILT FENCE OR OTHER EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT THE BASE OF STOCKPILES ON THE DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER. 9. PERMITTEES MUST LOCATE STOCKPILES OUTSIDE OF NATURAL BUFFERS OR SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING STORMWATER CONVEYANCES SUCH AS CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS UNLESS THERE IS A BYPASS IN PLACE FOR THE STORMWATER. 10. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A VEHICLE TRACKING BMP TO MINIMIZE THE TRACK OUT OF SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR ONTO PAVED ROADS WITHIN THE SITE. 11. PERMITTEES MUST USE STREET SWEEPING IF VEHICLE TRACKING BMPS ARE NOT ADEQUATE TO PREVENT SEDIMENT TRACKING ONTO THE STREET. 12. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 14. 13. IN ANY AREAS OF THE SITE WHERE FINAL VEGETATIVE STABILIZATION WILL OCCUR, PERMITTEES MUST RESTRICT VEHICLE AND EQUIPMENT USE TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION. 14. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE TOPSOIL ON THE SITE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 15. PERMITTEES MUST DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. 16. PERMITTEES MUST PRESERVE A 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER OR, IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE ON THE SITE, PROVIDE REDUNDANT (DOUBLE) PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS WHEN A SURFACE WATER IS LOCATED WITHIN 50 FEET OF THE PROJECT'S EARTH DISTURBANCES AND STORMWATER FLOWS TO THE SURFACE WATER. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL PERIMETER SEDIMENT CONTROLS AT LEAST 5 FEET APART UNLESS LIMITED BY LACK OF AVAILABLE SPACE. NATURAL BUFFERS ARE NOT REQUIRED ADJACENT TO ROAD DITCHES, JUDICIAL DITCHES, COUNTY DITCHES, STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAIN INLETS, AND SEDIMENT BASINS. IF PRESERVING THE BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PERMITTEES MUST DOCUMENT THE REASONS IN THE SWPPP. SHEET PILING IS A REDUNDANT PERIMETER CONTROL IF INSTALLED IN A MANNER THAT RETAINS ALL STORMWATER. 17. PERMITTEES MUST USE POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS IN ACCORDANCE WITH ACCEPTED ENGINEERING PRACTICES, DOSING SPECIFICATIONS AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL DESIGN SPECIFICATIONS PROVIDED BY THE MANUFACTURER OR SUPPLIER. THE PERMITTEES MUST USE CONVENTIONAL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS PRIOR TO CHEMICAL ADDITION AND MUST DIRECT TREATED STORMWATER TO A SEDIMENT CONTROL SYSTEM FOR FILTRATION OR SETTLEMENT OF THE FLOC PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (SECTION 10): 1. PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE TURBID OR SEDIMENT -LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING (E.G., PUMPED DISCHARGES, TRENCH/DITCH CUTS FOR DRAINAGE) TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENT BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MAY DEWATER TO SURFACE WATERS IF THEY VISUALLY CHECK TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED AND NUISANCE CONDITIONS (SEE MINN. R. 7050.0210, SUBP. 2) WILL NOT RESULT FROM THE DISCHARGE. IF PERMITTEES CANNOT DISCHARGE THE WATER TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN PRIOR TO ENTERING A SURFACE WATER, PERMITTEES MUST TREAT IT WITH APPROPRIATE BMPS SUCH THAT THE DISCHARGE DOES NOT ADVERSELY AFFECT THE SURFACE WATER OR DOWNSTREAM PROPERTIES. 2. IF PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE WATER CONTAINING OIL OR GREASE, THEY MUST USE AN OIL -WATER SEPARATOR OR SUITABLE FILTRATION DEVICE (E.G., CARTRIDGE FILTERS, ABSORBENTS PADS) PRIOR TO DISCHARGE. 3. PERMITTEES MUST DISCHARGE ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN -DRAINING ACTIVITIES IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION OR SCOUR IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS OR INUNDATION OF WETLANDS IN THE IMMEDIATE VICINITY OF DISCHARGE POINTS THAT CAUSES SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACT TO THE WETLAND. 4. IF PERMITTEES USE FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATER, THEY MUST HAUL THE BACKWASH WATER AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURN THE BACKWASH WATER TO THE BEGINNING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATE THE BACKWASH WATER INTO THE SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (SECTION 11): 1. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE A TRAINED PERSON, AS IDENTIFIED IN ITEM 21.2.6, WILL INSPECT THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITE AT LEAST ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 1/2 INCH IN 24 HOURS. 2. PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT AND MAINTAIN ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT BMPS. 3. PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS AND POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS. PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS WITH FUNCTIONAL BMPS BY THE END OF THE NEXT BUSINESS DAY AFTER DISCOVERY UNLESS ANOTHER TIME FRAME IS SPECIFIED IN ITEM 11.5 OR 11.6. PERMITTEES MAY TAKE ADDITIONAL TIME IF FIELD CONDITIONS PREVENT ACCESS TO THE AREA. 4. DURING EACH INSPECTION, PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE DITCHES AND CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS BUT NOT CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS, FOR EVIDENCE OF EROSION AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITION. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL DELTAS AND SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING DRAINAGE WAYS, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER DRAINAGE SYSTEMS AND RESTABILIZE THE AREAS WHERE SEDIMENT REMOVAL RESULTS IN EXPOSED SOIL. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS OF DISCOVERY UNLESS PRECLUDED BY LEGAL, REGULATORY, OR PHYSICAL ACCESS CONSTRAINTS. PERMITTEES MUST USE ALL REASONABLE EFFORTS TO OBTAIN ACCESS. IF PRECLUDED, REMOVAL AND STABILIZATION MUST TAKE PLACE WITHIN SEVEN (7) DAYS OF OBTAINING ACCESS. PERMITTEES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING ALL LOCAL, REGIONAL, STATE AND FEDERAL AUTHORITIES AND RECEIVING ANY APPLICABLE PERMITS, PRIOR TO CONDUCTING ANY WORK IN SURFACE WATERS. 5. PERMITTEES MUST INSPECT CONSTRUCTION SITE VEHICLE EXIT LOCATIONS, STREETS AND CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS WITHIN AND ADJACENT TO THE PROJECT FOR SEDIMENTATION FROM EROSION OR TRACKED SEDIMENT FROM VEHICLES. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE SEDIMENT FROM ALL PAVED SURFACES WITHIN ONE (1) CALENDAR DAY OF DISCOVERY OR, IF APPLICABLE, WITHIN A SHORTER TIME TO AVOID A SAFETY HAZARD TO USERS OF PUBLIC STREETS. 6. PERMITTEES MUST REPAIR, REPLACE OR SUPPLEMENT ALL PERIMETER CONTROL DEVICES WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR THE SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 OF THE HEIGHT OF THE DEVICE. 7. PERMITTEES MUST DRAIN TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASINS AND REMOVE THE SEDIMENT WHEN THE DEPTH OF SEDIMENT COLLECTED IN THE BASIN REACHES 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME. 8. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE THAT AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT ON THE SITE (OR AVAILABLE TO THE PROJECT SITE IN THREE (3) CALENDAR DAYS) IS TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN ITEM 21.2.B. 9. PERMITTEES MAY ADJUST THE INSPECTION SCHEDULE DESCRIBED IN ITEM 11.2 AS FOLLOWS: a. INSPECTIONS OF AREAS WITH PERMANENT COVER CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH, EVEN IF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY CONTINUES ON OTHER PORTIONS OF THE SITE; OR b. WHERE SITES HAVE PERMANENT COVER ON ALL EXPOSED SOIL AND NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS OCCURRING ANYWHERE ON THE SITE, INSPECTIONS CAN BE REDUCED TO ONCE PER MONTH AND, AFTER 12 MONTHS, MAY BE SUSPENDED COMPLETELY UNTIL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY RESUMES. THE MPCA MAY REQUIRE INSPECTIONS TO RESUME IF CONDITIONS WARRANT; OR c. WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY HAS BEEN SUSPENDED DUE TO FROZEN GROUND CONDITIONS, INSPECTIONS MAY BE SUSPENDED. INSPECTIONS MUST RESUME WITHIN 24 HOURS OF RUNOFF OCCURRING, OR UPON RESUMING CONSTRUCTION, WHICHEVER COMES FIRST. 10. PERMITTEES MUST RECORD ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEING CONDUCTED AND THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. THESE RECORDS MUST INCLUDE: a. DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS; AND b. NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS; AND c. ACCURATE FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING THE SPECIFIC LOCATION WHERE CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ARE NEEDED; AND d. CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN (INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES); AND e. DATE OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 1/2 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND THE AMOUNT OF RAINFALL FOR EACH EVENT. PERMITTEES MUST OBTAIN RAINFALL AMOUNTS BY EITHER A PROPERLY MAINTAINED RAIN GAUGE INSTALLED ONSITE, A WEATHER STATION THAT IS WITHIN ONE (1) MILE OF YOUR LOCATION, OR A WEATHER REPORTING SYSTEM THAT PROVIDES SITE SPECIFIC RAINFALL DATA FROM RADAR SUMMARIES; AND f. IF PERMITTEES OBSERVE A DISCHARGE DURING THE INSPECTION, THEY MUST RECORD AND SHOULD PHOTOGRAPH AND DESCRIBE THE LOCATION OF THE DISCHARGE (I.E., COLOR, ODOR, SETTLED OR SUSPENDED SOLIDS, OIL SHEEN, AND OTHER OBVIOUS INDICATORS OF POLLUTANTS); AND g. ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP PROPOSED AS A RESULT OF THE INSPECTION MUST BE DOCUMENTED AS REQUIRED IN SECTION 6 WITHIN SEVEN (7) CALENDAR DAYS. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT (SECTION 12): 1. PERMITTEES MUST PLACE BUILDING PRODUCTS AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. PERMITTEES ARE NOT REQUIRED TO COVER OR PROTECT PRODUCTS WHICH ARE EITHER NOT A SOURCE OF CONTAMINATION TO STORMWATER OR ARE DESIGNED TO BE EXPOSED TO STORMWATER. 2. PERMITTEES MUST PLACE PESTICIDES, FERTILIZERS AND TREATMENT CHEMICALS UNDER COVER (E.G., PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOFS) OR PROTECT THEM BY SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. 3. PERMITTEES MUST STORE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE, (INCLUDING OIL, DIESEL FUEL, GASOLINE, HYDRAULIC FLUIDS, PAINT SOLVENTS, PETROLEUM -BASED PRODUCTS, WOOD PRESERVATIVES, ADDITIVES, CURING COMPOUNDS, AND ACIDS) IN SEALED CONTAINERS TO PREVENT SPILLS, LEAKS OR OTHER DISCHARGE. STORAGE AND DISPOSAL OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS MUST BE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7045 INCLUDING SECONDARY CONTAINMENT AS APPLICABLE. 4. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY STORE, COLLECT AND DISPOSE SOLID WASTE IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7035. 5. PERMITTEES MUST POSITION PORTABLE TOILETS SO THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT TIP OR BE KNOCKED OVER. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE SANITARY WASTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH. 7041. 6. PERMITTEES MUST TAKE REASONABLE STEPS TO PREVENT THE DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED INCLUDING THE USE OF DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS UNLESS INFEASIBLE. PERMITTEES MUST ENSURE ADEQUATE SUPPLIES ARE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD IS AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. PERMITTEES MUST REPORT AND CLEAN UP SPILLS IMMEDIATELY AS REQUIRED BY MINN. STAT. 115.061, USING DRY CLEAN UP MEASURES WHERE POSSIBLE. 7. PERMITTEES MUST LIMIT VEHICLE EXTERIOR WASHING AND EQUIPMENT TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE, PERMITTEES MUST CONTAIN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHING AREA IN A SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER SIMILARLY EFFECTIVE CONTROLS AND MUST DISPOSE WASTE FROM THE WASHING ACTIVITY PROPERLY. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY USE AND STORE SOAPS, DETERGENTS, OR SOLVENTS. 8. PERMITTEES MUST PROVIDE EFFECTIVE CONTAINMENT FOR ALL LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES GENERATED BY WASHOUT OPERATIONS (E.G., CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS) RELATED TO THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. PERMITTEES MUST PREVENT LIQUID AND SOLID WASHOUT WASTES FROM CONTACTING THE GROUND AND MUST DESIGN THE CONTAINMENT SO IT DOES NOT RESULT IN RUNOFF FROM THE WASHOUT OPERATIONS OR AREAS. PERMITTEES MUST PROPERLY DISPOSE LIQUID AND SOLID WASTES IN COMPLIANCE WITH MPCA RULES. PERMITTEES MUST INSTALL A SIGN INDICATING THE LOCATION OF THE WASHOUT FACILITY. PERMIT TERMINATION (SECTION 4 AND SECTION 13): 1. PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ALL TERMINATION CONDITIONS LISTED IN SECTION 13 ARE COMPLETE. 2. PERMITTEES MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER SELLING OR OTHERWISE LEGALLY TRANSFERRING THE ENTIRE SITE, INCLUDING PERMIT RESPONSIBILITY FOR ROADS (E.G., STREET SWEEPING) AND STORMWATER INFRASTRUCTURE FINAL CLEAN OUT, OR TRANSFERRING PORTIONS OF A SITE TO ANOTHER PARTY. THE PERMITTEES' COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT TERMINATES AT MIDNIGHT ON THE SUBMISSION DATE OF THE NOT. 3. PERMITTEES MUST COMPLETE ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND MUST INSTALL PERMANENT COVER OVER ALL AREAS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. VEGETATIVE COVER MUST CONSIST OF A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATION WITH A DENSITY OF 70 PERCENT OF ITS EXPECTED FINAL GROWTH. VEGETATION IS NOT REQUIRED WHERE THE FUNCTION OF A SPECIFIC AREA DICTATES NO VEGETATION, SUCH AS IMPERVIOUS SURFACES OR THE BASE OF A SAND FILTER. 4. PERMITTEES MUST CLEAN THE PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM OF ANY ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND MUST ENSURE THE SYSTEM MEETS ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS IN SECTION 15 THROUGH 19 AND IS OPERATING AS DESIGNED. 5. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL SEDIMENT FROM CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. 6. PERMITTEES MUST REMOVE ALL TEMPORARY SYNTHETIC EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. PERMITTEES MAY LEAVE BMPS DESIGNED TO DECOMPOSE ON -SITE IN PLACE. 7. FOR RESIDENTIAL CONSTRUCTION ONLY PERMIT COVERAGE TERMINATES ON INDIVIDUAL LOTS IF THE STRUCTURES ARE FINISHED AND TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND DOWNGRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL IS COMPLETE, THE RESIDENCE SELLS TO THE HOMEOWNER, AND THE PERMITTEE DISTRIBUTES THE MPCA'S "HOMEOWNER FACT SHEET" TO THE HOMEOWNER. 8. FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS ON AGRICULTURAL LAND (E.G., PIPELINES ACROSS CROPLAND), PERMITTEES MUST RETURN THE DISTURBED LAND TO ITS PRECONSTRUCTION AGRICULTURAL USE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING THE NOT. SEED NOTES: ALL SEED MIXES AND APPLICATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. GENERAL RECOMMENDATIONS: THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE TO SALVAGE AND PRESERVE EXISTING TOPSOIL NECESSARY FOR FINAL STABILIZATION AND TO ALSO MINIMIZE COMPACTION IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. IMMEDIATELY BEFORE SEEDING THE SOIL SHALL BE TILLED TO A MINIMUM DEPTH OF 3 INCHES. TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING, MULCHING & BLANKET. SEED • TEMPORARY SEED SHALL BE MNDOT SEED MIX 21-112 (WINTER WHEAT COVER CROP) FOR WINTER AND 21-111 (OATS COVER CROP) FOR SPRING/SUMMER APPLICATIONS. BOTH SEED MIXES SHALL BE APPLIED AT A SEEDING RATE OF 100 LBS/ACRE. MULCH • IMMEDIATELY AFTER SEEDING, WITHIN 24 HOURS, MNDOT TYPE 1 MULCH SHOULD BE APPLIED TO PROTECT AND ENHANCE SEED GERMINATION. MULCH SHALL BE APPLIED AT 90% COVERAGE (2 TONS PER ACRE OF STRAW MULCH) SLOPES • 3:1 (HORIZ/VERT.) OR FLATTER MUCH SHALL BE COVERED WITH MULCH • SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR DITCH BOTTOMS SHALL BE COVERED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. • SEE PLAN FOR MORE DETAILED DITCH AND STEEP SLOPE EROSION CONTROL TREATMENTS. NOTE: QUANTITIES ARE FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY. CONTRACTOR SHALL DETERMINE FOR THEMSELVES THE EXACT QUANTITIES FOR BIDDING AND CONSTRUCTION. SWPPP CONTACT PERSON CONTRACTOR: SWPPP INSPECTOR TRAINING: ALL SWPPP INSPECTIONS MUST BE PERFORMED BY A PERSON THAT MEETS THE TRAINING REQUIREMENTS OF THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION SITE PERMIT. TRAINING CREDENTIALS SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND KEPT ON SITE WITH THE SWPPP TRAINING SECTION 21 DESIGN ENGINEER: MATTHEW R. PAVEK P.E. TRAINING COURSE: DESIGN OF SWPPP TRAINING ENTITY: UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA INSTRUCTOR: JOHN CHAPMAN DATES OF TRAINING COURSE: 5/15/2011 - 5/16/2011 TOTAL TRAINING HOURS: 12 RE -CERTIFICATION: 2/27/2020 (8 HOURS), EXP. 5/31/2023 AREAS AND QUANTITIES: OWNER INFORMATION Golden Valley Land Company 6001 Glenwood Avenue Golden Valley, MN 55422 CONTACT: Peter Knaeble peterknaeble@gmail.com 612-309-9215 OVERALL SITE AREA CALCULATIONS - ON SITE EXISTING PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE 0 SF 0.0% 210,460 SF 14.7% .ALL PAVEMENTS 0 SF 0.0% 233,435 SF 16.a% ALL NON-PA.VEI IENT.'S 1,434,632 SF 100.0% 990,737 SF 69.1% TOTAL SITE AREA 1,434,632 SF 100.096 1,454,652 SF 100.0% )VERALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - ON SITE :XISTING -CONDITION 0 SF 0.0% }R0ROSE D CONDITION 443,895 SF 30.9% IFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 443,895 SF 30.9% OVERALL EROSION CONTROL QUANTITIES ON SITE DISTURBEDAREA 1,155,912 SF 26.5 AC SILT FENCE/BIO-ROLL 9,820 LF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 72,825 SF INLET PROTECTION DEVICES ±26 EA OVERALL SITE AREA CALCULATIONS -OFF SITE EXISTING PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE 0 SF 0.096 0 SF 0.0% ALL PAVENIENT.S 0 SF 0.0% 25,758 SF 55.6% ALL NON-PAVEI TENTS 46,333 SF 100.0% 210,.575 SF 44.4% TOTAL SITE AREA 46,333 SF 100.0% 46,333 SF 100.0% 3VER.ALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - OFF SITE 'XISTING CONDITION D SF 0.0% IROPOSED CONDITION 25,759 SF 55.6% )IFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 25,759 SF 55.6% OVERALL EROSION CONTROL Q UA4NTITIE.S - OFF .SITE DISTURBED AREA 46,333 SF 1.1 AC SILT FENCE/BIO ROLL 1,420 LF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 0 SF INLET PROTECTION DEVICES ±2 EA PARTY RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT IS REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT TO MEET NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. THE CITY IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE LONG TERM OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PROPOSED STORMWATER SYSTEM. SWPPP ATTACHMENTS (ONLY APPLICABLE IF SITE IS 1 ACRE OR GREATER): CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN A COPY OF THE FOLLOWING SWPPP ATTACHMENTS WHICH ARE A PART OF THE OVERALL SWPPP PACKAGE: ATTACHMENT A. CONSTRUCTION SWPPP TEMPLATE - SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT ATTACHMENT B. CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST ATTACHMENT C. MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS ATTACHMENT D: STORMWATER MANAGEMENT REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. ATTACHMENT E: GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT - ON FILE AT THE OFFICE OF PROJECT ENGINEER. AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. SUPPLEMENTARY SITE SPECIFIC EROSION CONTROL NOTES: THESE NOTES SUPERCEDE ANY GENERAL SWPPP NOTES. THIS PROJECT IS GREATER THAN 1.0 ACRES SO AN NPDES PERMIT IS REQUIRED AND NEEDS TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. THE CONTRACTOR IS REQUIRED TO FOLLOW THE GUIDELINES IN THE NPDES PERMIT THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. PROJECT NARRATIVE: PROJECT IS SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION CREATING +/- 87 NEW LOTS. SITE AND LANDSCAPE IMPROVEMENTS WILL OCCUR. NATIVE BUFFER NARRATIVE: PRESERVING A 50' NATURAL BUFFER AROUND WATER BODIES IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THIS PROJECT BECAUSE WATER BODIES ARE NOT LOCATED ON SITE. INFILTRATION NARRATIVE: INFILTRATION IS NOT REQUIRED AS PART OF THE PROJECT BECAUSE SOIL CONDITIONS DO NOT ALLOW FOR INFILTRATION. WET BASINS ARE PROPOSED. SOIL CONTAMINATION NARRATIVE: SOILS ONSITE HAVE NOT BEEN IDENTIFIED AS CONTAMINATED. AN MPCA SOILS ASSESSMENT WAS COMPLETED AND IT WAS DETERMINED THAT THIS SITE IS APPROPRIATE FOR INFILTRATION, BUT DOES NOT APPLY. SPECIAL TMDL BMP REQUIREMENTS SITE SPECIFIC (IF REQUIRED): THIS PROJECT IS WITHIN ONE MILE AND DISCHARGES TO HARDWOOD CREEK AND IS IDENTIFIED AS AN IMPAIRED WATER BODY PER THE MPCA'S 303(D) IMPAIRED WATERS LIST. HARDWOOD CREEK IS IMPAIRED FOR DISSOLVED OXYGEN AND FISH BIOASSESSMENT INDICATORS. BECAUSE THESE WATERS ARE LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SITE, BMPS AS DEFINED IN THE NPDES PERMIT ITEMS 23.9 AND 23.10 APPLY. THESE ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1. DURING CONSTRUCTION: A. STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS MUST BE INITIATED IMMEDIATELY TO LIMIT SOIL EROSION BUT IN NO CASE COMPLETED LATER THAN SEVEN (7) DAYS AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IN THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. B. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN REQUIREMENTS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 14. MUST BE USED FOR COMMON DRAINAGE LOCATIONS THAT SERVE AN AREA WITH FIVE (5) OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME. PERMANENT STABILIZATION NOTES SITE SPECIFIC: PERMANENT SEED MIX • FOR THIS PROJECT ALL AREAS THAT ARE NOT TO BE SODDED OR LANDSCAPED SHALL RECEIVE A NATIVE PERMANENT SEED MIX. •• AREAS IN BUFFERS AND ADJACENT TO OR IN WET AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261 (STORMWATER SOUTH AND WEST) AT 35 LBS PER ACRE. •• DRY AREAS MNDOT SEED MIX 35-221 (DRY PRAIRIE GENERAL) AT 40 LBS PER ACRE. • MAINTENANCE SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE TO THE MNDOT SEEDING MANUAL. 0 0 00�e �aoULPD Civil Engineering - Surveying - Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 CV CV LO LO ♦O _(D V � r CO o J (D s .H U Lu O I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE No. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION SWPPP - NARRATIVE I SW1 3 ■ © COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP IN ATTACHMENT A: SITE SPECIFIC SWPPP DOCUMENT PROJECT NAME: THE MEADOWS AT HUGO PROJECT LOCATION (BRIEFLY DESCRIBE WHERE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY OCCURS. INCLUDE ADDRESS IF AVAILABLE.) ADDRESS: HUGO, MN CITY OR TOWNSHIP: HUGO STATE: MN ZIP CODE: 55038 LATITUDE/LONGITUDE OF APPROXIMATE CENTROID OF PROJECT: 45.18255 N,-92.99819 E METHOD OF LAT/LONG COLLECTION (CIRCLE ONE): GPS ONLINE TOOL USGS TOPOGRAPHIC ALL CITIES WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: HUGO ALL COUNTIES WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: WASHINGTON ALL TOWNSHIPS WHERE CONSTRUCTION WILL OCCUR: N/A PROJECT SIZE (NUMBER OF ACRES TO BE DISTURBED): 26.5 PROJECT TYPE (CIRCLE ONE): RESIDENTIAL OMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL ROAD CONSTRUCTION RESIDENTIAL & RD CONSTRUCTION OTHER (DESCRIBE): CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE (TO THE NEAREST TENTH ACRE) EXISTING AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 00.0 POST CONSTRUCTION AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 10.7 TOTAL NEW AREA OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 10.7 RECEIVING WATERS SOILS INFORMATION WATER BODY ID NAME OF WATER BODY WATER BODY TYPE SPECIAL WATER? (Y/N) IMPARIED WATER (Y/N) N/A COUNTY DITCH DITCH N N DATES OF CONSTRUCTION CONSTRUCTION START DATE: SUMMER 2021 ESTIMATED COMPLETION DATE: FALL 2023 GENERAL CONSTRUCTION PROJECT INFORMATION DESCRIBE THE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY (WHAT WILL BE BUILT, GENERAL TIMELINE, ETC): SINGLE FAMILY SUBDIVISION, INCLUDING ROADS, UTILITIES, GRADING, PONDING. DESCRIBE SOIL TYPES FOUND AT THE PROJECT: CLAY MAP UNIT MAP UNIT NAME SYMBOL 75 BLUFFTON LOAM 113 WEBSTER LOAM 123 DUNDAS FINE SANDY LOAM 544 CATHRO MUCK SITE LOCATION MAP - ATTACH MAPS (U.S. GEOLOGIC SURVEY 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE, NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY MAPS OR EQUIVALENT) SHOWING THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL RECEIVING WATERS, INCLUDING WETLANDS, DRAINAGE DITCHES, STORMWATER PONDS, OR BASINS, ETC. THAT WILL RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT. USE ARROWS SHOWING THE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND DISTANCE TO THE WATER BODY. GENERAL SITE INFORMATION (III.A) 1. DESCRIBE THE LOCATION AND TYPE OF ALL TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICIES (BMP'S). INCLUDE THE TIMING FOR INSTALLATION AND PROCEDURES USED TO ESTABLISH ADDITIONAL TEMPORARY BMP'S AS NECESSARY. (III.A.4.A) THE PROJECT IS PROTECTED BY TWO (W) MAIN BMP'S, SILT FENCE AND INLET PROTECTION DEVICES. THE SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE AND MONITORED AS NECESSARY. INLET PROTECTION DEVIDES WILL BE INSTALLED IN ALL CATCH BASINS ON THE SITE AND ANY OFF SITE THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THIS SITE. AS THE PROJECT PROGRESSES ADDITIONAL BMP'S SUCH AS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET MAY BE UTILITZED. 2. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A TABLE WITH THE ANTICIPATED QUANTITIES FOR THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT FOR ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (III.A.4.13) SEE PAGE SW1.3 3. ATTACH TO THIS SWPPP A SITE MAP THAT INCLUDES THE FOLLOWING FEATURES (III.A.3.B-F): EXIST AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST -CONSTRUCTION STORMRWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN THE PROJECT LIMITS. LOCATIONS OF IMPERVIOUS SURFACES AND SOIL TYPES. • EXISTING AND FINAL GRADES, INCLUDING DIVIDING LINES AND DIRECTION OF FLOW FOR ALL PRE AND POST -CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RUNOFF DRAINAGE AREAS LOCATED WITHIN PROJECT LIMITS. • LOCATIONS OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED. • LOCATION OF AREAS OF PHASED CONSTRUCTION. • ALL SURFACE WATERS AND EXISTING WETLANDS WITHIN ONE MILE FROM THE PROJECT BOUNDARIES THAT WILL RECEIVE STORMWATER RUNOFF FROM THE SITE (IDENTIFIABLE ON MAPS SUCH AS USGS 7.5 MINUTE QUADRANGLE MAPS OR EQUIVALENT. WHERE SURFACE WATERS RECEIVING RUNOFF ASSOCIATED WITH CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY WILL NOT FIT ON THE PLAN SHEET, THEY MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH AN ARROW, INDICATING BOTH DIRECTION AND DISTANCE TO THE SURFACE WATER. • METHODS TO BE USED FOR FINAL STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREA 4. WERE STORMWATER MITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRED AS THE RESULT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL, OR OTHER REQUIRED LOCAL, STATE OR FEDERAL REVIEW OF THE PROJECT? NO IF YES, DESCRIBE HOW THESE MEASURES WERE ADDRESSED IN THE SWPPP. (III.A.6) N/A 5. IS THE PROJECT LOCATED IN A KARST AREA SUCH THAT ADDITIONAL MEASURES WOULD BE NECESSARY TO PROJECT DRINKING WATER SUPPLY MANAGEMENT AREAS AS DESCRIBED IN MINN. R. CHAPTERS 7050 AND 7060? NO IF YES, DESCRIBE THE ADDITIONAL MEASURES TO BE USED. (III.A.7) N/A 6. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A CALCEREOUS FEN LISTED IN MINN. R. 7050.0180, SUBP. 6 B? NO IF YES, A LETTER OF APPROVAL FROM THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES MUST BE OBTAINED PRIOR TO APPLICATION FOR THIS PERMIT. (PART I B.6 AND PART III.A.8) 7. DOES THE SITE DISCHARGE TO A WATER THAT IS LISTED AS IMPAIRED FOR THE FOLLOWING POLLUTANT(S) OR STRESSOR(S): PHOSPHORUS, TURBIDITY, DISSOLVED OXYGEN OR BIOTIC IMPAIRMENT? USE THE SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERS SEARCH TOOL AT: WWW.PCA.STATE.MN.US/WATER/STORMWATER/STORMWATER-C.HTML N/A IF NO, SKIP TO TRAINING DOES THE IMPAIRED WATER HAVE AN APPROVED TOTAL MAXIMUM DAILY LOADS (TMDL) WITH AN APPROVED WASTE LOAD ALLOCATION FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY? NO IF YES: A. LIST THE RECEIVING WATER, THE AREAS OF THE SITE DISCHARGING TO IT, AND THE POLLUTANT(S) IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL. B. LIST THE BMP'S AND ANY OTHER SPECIFIC CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER RELATED IMPLEMENTATION ACTIVITIES IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL. IF THE SITE HAS A DISCHARGE POINT WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE IMPAIRED WATER AND THE WATER FLOWS TO THE IMPAIRED WATER BUT NO SPECIFIC BMPS FOR CONSTRUCTION ARE IDENTIFIED IN THE TMDL, THE ADDITIONAL BMPS IN APPENDIX A (C.1, C.2, C.3 & (CA -TROUT STREAM)) MUST BE ADDED TO THE SWPPP AND IMPLEMENTED. (III.A.7). THE ADDITIONAL BMPS ONLY APPLY TO THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PROJECT THAT DRAIN TO ONE OF THE IDENTIFIED DISCHARGE POINTS. N/A 8. IDENTIFY ADJACENT PUBLIC WATERS WHERE THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES (DNR) HAS DECLARED "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" DURING FISH SPAWNING TIMEFRAMES N/A SELECTION OF A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (III.D.) 1. WILL THE PROJECT CREATE A NEW CUMULATIVE IMPERVIOUS SURFACE GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO ONE ACRE? YES IF YES, A WATER QUALITY VOLUME OF ONE INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE CUMULATIVE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE (SEE PART III.D OF THE PERMIT) THROUGH INFILTRATION UNLESS PROHIBITED DUE TO ONE OF THE REASONS IN PART III.D.1.J. IF INFILTRATION IS PROHIBITED IDENTIFY OTHER METHOD OF OTHER VOLUME REDUCTION (E.G., FILTRATION SYSTEM, WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN, REGIONAL PONDING OR EQUIVALENT METHOD 2. DESCRIBE WHICH METHOD WILL BE USED TO TREAT RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT (III.D) • WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN • INFILTRATION/FILTRATION • REGIONAL PONDS • COMBINATION OF PRACTICES INCLUDE ALL CALCULATIONS AND DESIGN INFORMATION FOR THE METHOD SELECTED. SEE PART III.D OF THE PERMIT FOR SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS ASSOCIATED WITH EACH METHOD. WET SEDIMENTATION BASIN CALCULATIONS ARE WITHIN THE SITE STORM WATER MANAGEMENT REPORT AND PART OF THIS SWPPP AS ATTACHMENT D. 3. IF IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO MEET THE TREATMENT REQUIREMENT FOR THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME, DESCRIBE WHY. THIS CAN INCLUDE PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAY PRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANY PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENT, SUCH AS GRASSES SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS, WILL BE IMPLEMENTED TO TREAT RUNOFF PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. (III.C) IT IS NOT FEASIBLE TO MEET REQUIREMENT FOR WATER QUALITY VOLUME DUE TO CLAY SOILS. 4. FOR PROJECTS THAT DISCHARGE TO TROUT STREAMS, INCLUDING TRIBUTARIES TO TROUT STREAMS, IDENTIFY METHOD OF INCORPORATING TEMPERATURE CONTROLS INTO THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. N/A EROSION PREVENTION PRACTICES (IV.B) DESCRIBE THE TYPES OF TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION BMP'S EXPECTED TO BE IMPLEMENTED ON THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCITON: 1. DESCRIBE CONSTRUCTION PHASING, VEGETATIVE BUFFER STRIPS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION PRACTICES TO MINIMIZE EROSION. DELINEATE AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED (E.G., WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC.) BEFORE WORK BEGINS. SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AT THE DOWNHILL LOCATIONS OF THE SITE. 2. DESCRIBE METHODS OF TEMPORARILY STABILIZING SOILS AND SOIL STOCKPILES (E.G., MULCHES, HYDRAULIC TACKIFIERS, EROSION BLANKETS, ETC.): TEMPORARY EROSION PROTECTION WILL BE SEED AND MULCH AND EROSION BLANKETS WHERE REQUIRED, WITH PERMANENT COVER BEING EITHER SOD OR LANDSCAPE FEATURES. 3. DESCRIBE METHODS OF DISSIPATING VELOCITY ALONG STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS AND AT CHANNEL OUTLETS (E.G., CHECK DAMS, SEDIMENT TRAPS, RIP RAP, ETC.): SOD WILL BE UTILIZED ALONG CHANNELS AND RIP RAP AT CHANNEL. 4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STABILIZATION OF DITCH AND SWALE WETTED PERIMETERS (NOTE THAT MULCH, HYDRAULIC SOIL TACKIFIERS, HYDROMULCHES, ETC. ARE NOT ACCEPTABLE SOIL STABILIZATION METHODS FOR ANY PART OF A DRAINAGE DITCH OR SWALE) FINAL STABILIZATION OF SWALES WILL BE SOD 5. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR ENERGY DISSIPATION AT PIPE OUTLETS (E.G., RIP RAP, SPLASH PADS, GABIONS, ETC.) RIP RAP WILL BE UTILIZED AT PIPE OUTLETS 6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO PROMOTE INFILTRATION AND SEDIMENT REMOVAL ON THE SITE PRIOR TO OFFSITE DISCHARGE, UNLESS INFEASIBLE (E.G., DIRECT STORMWATER FLOW TO VEGETATED AREAS): DISCONNECTED IMPERVIOUS AREA AND INFILTRATION AREAS WILL BE UTILIZED 7. FOR DRAINAGE OR DIVERSION DITCHES, DESCRIBE PRACTICES TO STABILIZE THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET OF THE PROPERTY EDGE OR POINT OF DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATER. THE LAST 200 LINEAL FEET MUST BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTING TO SURFACE WATERS AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT PORTION OF THE DITCH HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED FOR ALL DISCHARGES TO SPECIAL, IMPAIRED OR "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS". ALL OTHER REMAINING PORTIONS OF THE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DITCHES OR SWALES WITHIN 14 CALENDAR DAYS AFTER CONNECTING TO A SURFACE WATER, PROPERTY EDGE AND CONSTRUCTION IN THAT AREA HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. IF USED, TEMPORARY DRAINAGE DITCHES WILL BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION BLANKET AND HAY BALES / CHECK DAMS. 8. DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION MEASURES THAT WILL BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION (E.G., CONSTRUCTION PHASING, MINIMIZING SOIL DISTURBANCE, VEGETATIVE BUFFERS, HORIZONTAL SLOPE GRADING, SLOPE DRAINING/TERRACING, ETC.): OTHER EROSION CONTROL PRACTICES INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO; MINIMIZING SITE EXPOSURE WHEN POSSIBLE. 9. IF APPLICABLE, INCLUDE ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS IN APPENDIX A PART C.3 REGARDING MAINTAINING A 100-FOOT BUFFER ZONE OR INSTALLING REDUNDANT BMPS FOR PORTIONS OF THE SITE THAT DRAIN TO SPECIAL WATERS). N/A 10. IF APPLICABLE, DESCRIBE ADDITIONAL EROSION PREVENTION BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THE SITE TO PROTECT PLANNED INFILTRATION AREAS NOT APPLICABLE SEDIMENT CONTROL PRACTICIES (IV.C) DESCRIBE THE METHODS OF SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO BE IMPLEMENTED AT THIS SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION TO MINIMIZE SEDIMENT IMPACTS TO SURFACE WATERS, INCLUDING CURB AND GUTTER SYSTEMS 1. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETER CONTROL: SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED AROUND THE ENTIRE PERIMETER OF THE SITE, AND AROUND WETLANDS AND DISCHARGE POINTS. 2. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SOIL STOCKPILES: SEED AND MULCH AS WELL HYDROSEED WILL BE UTILIZED AS NECESSARY 3. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED FOR STORM DRAIN INLET PROTECTION: SEE INLET PROTECTION DETAILS 4. DESCRIBE METHODS TO MINIMIZE VEHICLE TRACKING AT CONSTRUCTION EXITS AND STREET SWEEPING ACTIVITIES: THE PROJECT WILL UTILIZE A ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE. 5. DESCRIBE METHODS, IF APPLICABLE, ADDITIONAL SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO BE INSTALLED TO KEEP RUNOFF AWAY FROM PLANNED INFILTRATION AREAS WHEN EXCAVATED PRIOR TO FINAL STABILIZATION OF THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA: SILT FENCE TO BE INSTALLED IMMEDIATELY AFTER GRADING TO PROTECT STORMWATER AREAS. 6. DESCRIBE METHODS TO BE USED TO MINIMIZE SOIL COMPACTION AND PRESERVE TOP SOIL (UNLESS INFEASIBLE) AT THIS SITE: LIGHT TRACKED EQUIPMENT WILL BE USED, TOPSOIL WILL BE STRIPPED AND STOCKPILED 7. DESCRIBE PLANS TO PRESERVE A 50-FOOT NATURAL BUFFER BETWEEN THE PROJECT'S SOIL DISTURBANCE AND A SURFACE WATER OR PLANS FOR REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE: SILT FENCE WILL BE INSTALLED ALONG WETLANDS AND CREEK 8. DESCRIBE PLANS FOR USE OF SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS (E.G., POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS, ETC.) SEE PART IV.C.10 OF THE PERMIT: N/A 9. IS THE PROJECT REQUIRED TO INSTALL A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN DUE TO 10 OR MORE ACRES DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCATION OR 5 ACRES OR MORE IF THE SITE IS WITHIN 1 MILE OF A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER? NO IF YES, DESCRIBE (OR ATTACH PLANS) SHOWING HOW THE BASIN WILL BE DESIGNED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART III.0 OF THE PERMIT. N/A DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING (IV.D) 1. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING? NO IF YES, DESCRIBE MEASURES TO BE USED TO TREAT/DISPOSE OF TURBID OR SEDIMENT -LADEN WATER AND METHOD TO PREVENT EROSION OR SCOUR OF DISCHARGE POINTS (SEE PART IV. D OF THE PERMIT): N/A 2. WILL THE PROJECT INCLUDE USE OF FILTERS FOR BACKWASH WATER? NO IF YES, DESCRIBE HOW FILTER BACKWASH WATER WILL BE MANAGED ON THE SITE OR PROPERLY DISPOSED (SEE PART III.D.3. OF THE PERMIT): N/A ADDITIONAL BMP'S FOR SPECIAL WATERS AND DISCHARGES TO WETLANDS (APPENDIX A, PARTS C AND D) 1. SPECIAL WATERS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE TO SPECIAL WATERS? NO 2. IF PROXIMITY TO BEDROCK OR ROAD PROJECTS WHERE THE LACK OF RIGHT OF WAY PRECLUDES THE INSTALLATION OF ANY OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES THEN OTHER TREATMENT SUCH AS GRASSED SWALES, SMALLER PONDS, OR GRIT CHAMBERS IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS. DESCRIBE WHAT OTHER TREATMENT WILL BE PROVIDED. N/A 3. DESCRIBE EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS FOR EXPOSED SOIL AREAS WITH A CONTINUOUS POSITIVE SLOPE TO A SPECIAL WATERS, AND TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS FOR AREAS THAT DRAIN FIVE OR MORE ACRES DISTURBED AT ONE TIME. N/A 4. DESCRIBE THE UNDISTURBED BUFFER ZONE TO BE USED (NOT LESS THAN 100 LINEAR FEET FROM THE SPECIAL WATER). N/A 5. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL ENSURE THAT THE PRE AND POST PROJECT RUNOFF RATE AND VOLUME FROM THE 1, AND 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION EVENTS REMAINS THE SAME. N/A 6. DESCRIBE HOW THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM WILL MINIMIZE ANY INCREASE IN THE TEMPERATURE OF TROUT STREAM RECEIVING WATERS RESULTING IN THE 1, AND 2-YEAR 24-HOUR PRECIPITATION EVENTS. N/A 7. WETLANDS. DOES YOUR PROJECT DISCHARGE STORMWATER WITH THE POTENTIAL FOR SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS TO A WETLAND (E.G., CONVERSION OF A NATURAL WETLAND TO A STORMWATER POND)? YES IF YES, DESCRIBE THE WETLAND MITIGATION SEQUENCE THAT WILL BE FOLLOWED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART D OF APPENDIX A. SUMPS HAVE BEEN PROVIDED UPSTREAM OF THE DISCHARGE POINTS. INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE (IV.E) DESCRIBE PROCEDURES TO ROUTINELY INSPECT THE CONSTRUCTION SITE: • ONCE EVERY SEVEN (7) DAYS DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND • WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS, AND WITHIN (7) DAYS AFTER THAT INSPECTIONS MUST INCLUDE STABILIZED AREAS, EROSION PREVENTION,AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S AND INFILTRATION AREAS. INSPECTOR WILL FOLLOW REQUIREMENTS SPECIFIED ABOVE AND FILL OUT "ATTACHMENT B - CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER INSPECTION CHECKLIST" 1. Describe practices for storage of building products with a potential to leach pollutants to minimize exposure to stormwater: ALL BUILDING PRODUCTS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZE EXPOSURE 2. Describe practices for storage of pesticides, herbicides, insecticides, fertilizers, treatment chemical, and landscape materials: ALL LANDSCAPE TREATMENT CHEMICALS WILL BE SEALED AND STORED IN A MANNER TO MINIMIZED EXPOSURE 3. Describe practices for storage and disposal of hazardous materials or toxic waste (e.g., oil, fuel, hydraulic fluids, paint solvents, petroleum -based products, wood preservative, additives, curing compounds, and acids) according to Minn. R. ch. 7045, including restricted access and secondary containment: ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS. 4. Describe collection, storage and disposal of solid waste in compliance with Minn. R. ch. 7035: ALL CONSTRUCTION DEBRIS AND SOLID WASTER WILL BE APPROPRIATELY DISPOSED OF OFF SITE ACCORDING TO LOCAL AND STATE LAWS 5. Describe management of portable toilets to prevent tipping and disposal of sanitary wastes in accordance with Minn. R. ch. 7040: SANITARY AND SEPTIC SERVICES WILL BE PROVIDED TO WORKERS WITH PORTABLE FACILITIES MAINTAINED AS NEEDED BY THE PROVIDER. 6. Describe spill prevention and response for fueling and equipment or vehicle maintenance: EMPLOYEES WILL BE TRAINED IN TECHNIQUES DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE SPILLS. VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT SHALL BE CHECKED FOR LEAKS. 7. Describe containment and disposal of vehicle and equipment wash water and prohibiting engine degreasing on the site: ALL CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES SHALL BE WASHED OFF SITE 8. Describe storage and disposal of concrete and other washout wastes so that wastes do not contact the ground: ALL CONCRETE WASHOUT SHALL OCCUR OFF SITE. FINAL STABILIZATION (IV.G) 1. DESCRIBE METHOD OF FINAL STABILIZATION (PERMANENT COVER) OF ALL DISTURBED AREAS: FINAL STABILIZATION WILL BE ACCOMPLISHED WITH PAVEMENT, SOD AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. 2. DESCRIBE PROCEDURES FOR COMPLETING FINAL STABILIZATION AND TERMINATING PERMIT COVERAGE (SEE PART IV.G.1-5): UPON STABILIZATION DESCRIBED ABOVE, THE CONTRCTOR AND OWNER SHALL MUTUALLY TRANSFER THE NPDES PERMIT TO THE NEXT OWNER WITH DOCUMENTS DESCRIBING THE NATURE OF TERMINATION PROCEDURE. DOCUMENTATION OF INFEASIBILITY: (IF APPLICABLE) (C R017 0 Do R a �e a M O M Y, Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 O O7 2 N t= O c\� a' / _0 O r O � W a N V O v CD CO I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION WPPP - ATTACHMENTS SW1 04 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP I ATTACHMENT 6: SWPPP INSPECTION FORM ATTACHMENT C: MAINTENANCE PLAN FOR PERMANENT STORM WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM NOTE: THIS INSPECTION REPORT DOES NOT ADDRESS ALL ASPECTS OF THE NATIONAL APOLLUTANT DISCHARGE ELIMINATION SYSTEM/STATE DISPOSAL SYSTEM (NPDES/SDS) CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT ISSUED ON AUGUST 1, 2013. THE COMPLETION OF THIS CHECKLIST DOES NOT GUARANTEE THAT ALL PERMIT REQUIREMENTS ARE IN COMPLIANCE; IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE PERMITTEE(S) TO READ AND UNDERSTAND THE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS. FACILITY INFORMATION SITE NAME: THE MEADOWS AT HUGO FACILITY ADDRESS: HUGO, MN PERMIT NUMBER: CITY: HUGO STATE: MN ZIP CODE: 55038 INSPECTION INFORMATION INSPECTOR NAME: PHONE NUMBER: DATE (MM/DD/YYYY): TIME: AM / PM IS THE INSPECTOR CERTIFIED IN SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL AND IS IT DOCUMENTED IN THE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP)? IS THIS INSPECTION ROUTINE OR IN RESPONSE TO A STORM EVENT: RAINFALL AMOUNT (IF APPLICABLE): IS THE SITE WITHIN ONE AERIAL MILE OF A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER? IF YES, FOLLOW APPENDIX A AND OTHER APPLICABLE PERMIT REQUIREMENTS NOTE: IF N/A IS SELECTED AT ANY TIME. SPECIFY WHY IN THE COMMENT AREA FOR THAT SECTION. EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENT (PART IV.B) Y N N/A 1. SOIL STABILIZATION WHERE NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY FOR 14 DAYS? (7 DAYS WHERE APPLICABLE) 2. HAS THE NEED TO DISTURB STEEP SLOPES BEEN MINIMIZED? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. ALL DITCHES STABILIZED 200; BACK FROM POINT OF DISCHARGE WITHIN 24 HOURS? (NOT MULCH) ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. ARE THERE BMP'S FOR ONSITE STOCKPILES? ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. ARE APPROPRIATE BMP'S INSTALLED PROTECTING INLETS/OUTLETS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. DO PIPE OUTLETS HAVE ENERGY DISSIPATION? n n F-1 COMMENTS: SEDIMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENT (PART IV.C) Y N N/A 1. PERIMETER CONTROL INSTALLED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. PERIMETER CONTROL TRENCHED IN WHERE APPROPRIATE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. 50 FOOT NATURAL BUFFER MAINTAINED AROUND ALL SURFACE WATERS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3.1. IF NO, HAVE REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS BEEN INSTALLED? ❑ ❑ ❑ 4. INLET PROTECTION ON ALL CATCH BASINS AND CULVERT INLETS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. VEHICLE TRACKING BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMP'S) AT ALL SITE EXITS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 6. ALL TRACKED SEDIMENT REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 7. ARE ALL INFILTRATION SYSTEMS STAKED AND MARKED TO AVOID COMPACTION? ❑ ❑ ❑ 8. ARE ALL INFILTRATION AREAS PROTECTED WITH A PRETREATMENT DEVICE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 9. DO ALL STOCKPILES HAVE PERIMETER CONTROLS? ❑ ❑ ❑ COMMENTS: MAINTENANCE -EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S (PART IV.E.) Y N N/A 1. ARE ALL PREVIOUSLY STABILIZED AREAS MAINTAINING 90% GROUND COVER? ❑ ❑ ❑ . ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. PERIMETER -- ❑ 4. ARE PROTECTION DEVICES MAINTAINED AND FUNCTIONING PROPERLY? ❑ ❑ INLET F-1 F-1 F-1 COMMENTS: OTHER Y N N/A 1. ARE ALL MATERIALS THAT CAN LEACH POLLUTANTS UNDER COVER? ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. HAS ACCESS BEEN RESTRICTED TO ONSITE HAZARDOUS MATERIALS? ❑ ❑ ❑ 3. DOES ON -SITE FUELING ONLY OCCUR IN A CONTAINED AREA? ❑ ❑ ❑ . ❑ ❑ ❑ 5. IS THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA COMPLETELYCONTAINED? El El El 6. IS THE CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA MARKED WITH SIGN? El El El COMMENTS: Y N N/A 7. WERE ANY DISCHARGES SEEN DURING THIS INSPECTION, SEDIMENT, WATER, OR OTHERWISE? 7.1. IF YES, STATE THE EXACT LOCATION OF ALL POINTS OF DISCHARGE. PHOTOGRAPH THE DISCHARGE AND DESCRIBE THE DISCHARGE (COLOR, ODOR, FOAM, OIL SHEEN, ETC). HOW WILL IT BE REMOVED? HOW DID THE DISCHARGE HAPPEN? HOW MUCH WAS DISCHARGED? HOW WILL IT BE STOPPED, AND HOW LONG WILL IT TAKE TO STOP? IS THE DISCHARGE GOING INTO AN ADJACENT SITE? WAS THE DISCHARGE A SEDIMENT DELTA? IF YES, WILL THE DELTA BE RECOVERED WITHIN 7 DAYS? 8. WILL A PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BE UTILIZED IN THIS PROJECT AS REQUIRED AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH PART III.D OF THE PERMIT? DESCRIBE: Y N N/A 9. IS ANY DEWATERING OCCURRING ON SITE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 9.1. IF YES, WHERE? WHAT BMP IS BEING USED? HOW MUCH WATER IS BEING DEWATERED? IS THE WATER CLEAR? WHERE IS THE WATER BEING DISCHARGED TO? Y N N/A 10. IS A COPY OF THE SWPPP LOCATED ON THE CONSTRUCTION SITE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 11. HAS THE SWPPP BEEN FOLLOWED AND IMPLEMENTED ON SITE? ❑ ❑ ❑ 12. IS A SEDIMENTATION BASIN REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT AS SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT? ❑ ❑ ❑ 12.1. IF YES, ARE THEY MAINTAINED AS SPECIFIED IN THE PERMIT? ❑ ❑ ❑ 13. IS THE TOPSOIL ON THIS PROJECT BEING PRESERVED? ❑ ❑ ❑ 13.1. IF YES, EXPLAIN HOW THE TOPSOIL IS BEING PRESERVED. IF NO, EXPLAIN WHY IT WAS INFEASIBLE. 14. ARE ALL INFILTRATION SYSTEMS MARKED TO AVOID COMPACTION? Y ❑ N ❑ N/A ❑ 14.1. DO ALL INFILTRATION AREAS HAVE PRETREATMENT DEVICES? ❑ ❑ ❑ 15. DESCRIPTION OF AREAS OF NON-COMPLIANCE NOTED DURING THE INSPECTION, REQUIRED CORRECTIVE ACTIONS, AND RECOMMENDED DATE OF COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONS: 16. PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP: 17. POTENTIAL AREAS OF FUTURE CONCERN: 18. ADDITIONAL COMMENTS DISCLOSURES: • AFTER DISCOVERY, THE PERMIT REQUIRES MANY OF THE DEFICIENCIES THAT MAY BE FOUND IN THIS CHECKLIST BE CORRECTED WITHIN A SPECIFIED PERIOD OF TIME. SEE PERMIT FOR MORE DETAILS. • THIS INSPECTION CHECKLIST IS AN OPTION FOR SMALL CONSTRUCTION SITES. LARGE CONSTRUCTION SITES AND LINEAR PROJECTS REQUIRE MORE EXTENSIVE/MORE LOCATION SPECIFIC INSPECTION REQUIREMENTS. • THE PERMITTEE(S) IS/ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE OF TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT BMP'S AS WELL AS EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMP'S UNTIL ANOTHER PERMITTEE HAS OBTAINED COVERAGE UNDER THIS PERMIT ACCORDING TO PART II.B.5.. OR THE PROJECT HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION AND A NOTICE OF TERMINATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA. ATTACHMENT C - ABOVE -GROUND FACILITY MANAGEMENT SCHEDULE 1 . ALL STORMWATER RETENTION, DETENTION AND TREATMENT BASINS MUST BE INSPECTED AT LEAST ONCE A YEAR TO DETERMINE THAT BASIN RETENTION AND TREATMENT CHARACTERISTICS ARE ADEQUATE. A STORAGE TREATMENT BASIN WILL BE CONSIDERED INADEQUATE IF SEDIMENT HAS DECREASED THE WET STORAGE VOLUME BY 50 PERCENT OR DRY STORAGE VOLUME BY 25 PERCENT OF ITS ORIGINAL DESIGN VOLUME. BASED ON THIS INSPECTION, IF A STORMWATER BASIN REQUIRES SEDIMENT CLEANOUT, THE BASIN WILL BE RESTORED TO ITS ORIGINAL DESIGN CONTOURS AND VEGETATED STATE WITHIN ONE YEAR OF THE INSPECTION DATE. 2. ALL OUTLET STRUCTURES, CULVERTS, OUTFALL STRUCTURES AND OTHER STORMWATER FACILITIES FOR WHICH MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS ARE NOT OTHERWISE SPECIFIED HEREIN MUST BE INSPECTED IN THE SPRING, SUMMER AND FALL OF EACH YEAR. WITHIN 30 DAYS OF THE INSPECTION DATE, ALL ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT AND DEBRIS MUST BE REMOVED SUCH THAT EACH STORMWATER FACILITY OPERATES AS DESIGNED AND PERMITTED. CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BE KEPT CLEAR OF LITTER AND VEGETATIVE DEBRIS, INFLOW PIPES AND OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS KEPT CLEAR, INLET AREAS KEPT CLEAN, AND UNDESIRABLE VEGETATION REMOVED. EROSION IMPAIRING THE FUNCTION OR INTEGRITY OF THE FACILITIES, IF ANY, WILL BE CORRECTED, AND ANY STRUCTURAL DAMAGE IMPAIRING OR THREATENING TO IMPAIR THE FUNCTION OF THE FACILITIES MUST BE REPAIRED. 3. VOLUME CONTROL FACILITIES AND CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS MUST BE INSPECTED EVERY THREE MONTHS DURING THE OPERATIONAL PERIOD (BETWEEN SPRING SNOWMELT AND FIRST SUBSTANTIAL SNOWFALL) AND MONITORED AFTER RAINFALL EVENTS OF 1 INCH OR MORE TO ENSURE THAT THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS CLEAR OF LITTER AND DEBRIS, INFLOW PIPES AND OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS ARE CLEAR, INLET AREAS ARE CLEAN, UNDESIRABLE VEGETATION IS REMOVED AND THERE IS NO EROSION IMPAIRING OR THREATENING TO IMPAIR THE FUNCTION OF A FACILITY. IF SEDIMENT HAS ACCUMULATED IN A INFILTRATION FEATURE, WITHIN 30 DAYS OF INSPECTION DEPOSITED SEDIMENTS MUST BE REMOVED, THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE UNDERLYING SOILS MUST BE RESTORED, AND ANY SURFACE DISTURBANCE MUST BE STABILIZED. INSPECTION MUST ENSURE THAT SEDIMENT TRAPS AND FOREBAYS ARE TRAPPING SEDIMENT AND THAT MORE THAN 50 PERCENT OF THE STORAGE VOLUME REMAINS, THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA IS STABLE (I.E., NO EROSION IS OBSERVED), AND INLETS AND OUTLET/OVERFLOW SPILLWAYS ARE IN GOOD CONDITIONS WITH NO EROSION. MAINTENANCE TECHNIQUES USED MUST PROTECT THE INFILTRATION CAPACITY OF THE PRACTICE BY LIMITING SOIL COMPACTION TO THE GREATEST EXTENT POSSIBLE (E.G., BY USING LOW -IMPACT EARTH -MOVING EQUIPMENT). (C 0 R0�� Ro�e c m o U Y, Civil Engineering ^ Surveying ^ Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 II U W O fy a_ :�% a) 0 E: O c� a' O r O 0 � N V C:)v CD CO I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. Matthew R. Pavek DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 44263 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE I DESCRIPTION WPPP - ATTACHMENTS SW1 05 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP I FA CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Hugo Planning Commission FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Drengson May Enterprises, LLC. — Sketch Plan for the property located West of Falcon Avenue North and North of 121" Street North. DATE: February 4, 2021, for the Planning Commission Meeting of February 11, 2021. ZONING: Large Lot Single -Family Residential (R-1) LAND USE: Very Low Density Residential (VLD) 120-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: April 22, 2021 1. BACKGROUND: The properties are generally located west of Falcon Avenue North and north of 121" Street North. There are three properties that total approximately 15 acres. The two properties to the east are currently vacant, relatively flat, and there is a wetland on the west side of the properties. The west 5.36 acre parcel has a house that would remain on its own lot, and will create two new lots. The applicant would like to receive feedback on the project in regards to general layout, proposed variance request, and road and utility construction. 2. SKETCH PLAN: The applicant is planning to subdivide the three parcels of land to create parcels that are 1 acre or more. The plan shows 10 proposed residential lots, stormwater ponding areas, streets, and utilities. The sketch plan was completed to get comments from the Planning Commission and City Council prior to moving forward with the formal development approval process. Zoning and Regulations The three parcels are located in the Large Lot Single -Family Residential (R-1) zoning district. The minimum lot size is 1 acre for subdivisions in the zoning district. The applicant intends to comply with all of the zoning district regulations for the district, except for Lots 8 and 9, where they would need to ask for a variance for the lot widths. The lot widths are proposed to be approximately 30 feet, where 150 feet is required by ordinance. Lots 8 and 9 cannot be easily FA integrated in to the proposed lots on the cul-de-sac due to the Metropolitan Council sewer line easement and a wetland complex that divides the three parcels. The property that is proposed for the creation of Lots 8, 9, and 10 is 5.36 acres and can be subdivided, therefore it is a reasonable request. However the shape of the property is unique in that has three separate access points to public streets, two on Everton Avenue North and one on 121St Street North. Besides the access point for the existing house that will remain, the other access points do not meet the minimum lot width requirements. The property has been this shape for several decades and staff did not find any information on how it became this way. There are other properties in the area that do not meet the lot width requirements for the zoning district and the proposed variance would not noticeably change the character of the area. The applicant is also working with the property owner located at 4898 121" Street North to adjust the property lines to widen the access point on 121 st Street. A portion of the property is located within the Shoreland Overlay District and shall meet all the regulations. The sketch plan as shown meets the shoreland regulations. Utilities Development of the site requires connections to municipal utilities. Sanitary sewer service is available in the middle of the site via the Met Council sewer interceptor. Water service is available within 700 feet to the west on Everton Avenue North. The utilities would need to be extended to the property and to the property boundaries. The utilities would need to be extended past several properties that are not included in the in the sketch plan. The applicant has been meeting with the surrounding property owners and has indicated that some of the property owners are interested in connecting to municipal sewer and/or water if they were to become available, with possible assessments. In this case, the construction cost would be paid with assessments. Staff is recommending an informational meeting be held with the neighborhood to discuss what a public improvement project would look like and to gage interest from adjacent properties. Streets & Access The property is located along 121 st Street North, which is a gravel roadway. The existing house located on Lot 10 is proposed to continue to have its driveway connection to Everton Avenue North, as well as the the proposed house to be located on Lot 8. Lot 9 is proposed to have a connection to 121 st Street North. Lots 1-7 will be located on the new public street and shall be an urban -section paved roadway with curb and gutter, with access to 121 st Street. 121St Street North is currently a rural -section roadway with a gravel surface. Staff recommends that the entire length of the street, from Everton Avenue to Falcon Avenue, be paved. A rural - section paved roadway should be sufficient in this case. FA Grading/Drainage Wetlands: The site contains 1.48 acres of wetlands. The applicant is not proposing to impact the wetlands. A wetland delineation has been approved by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP). Site Grading/Low Floor Elevations: The development contains a 1.48 acre wetland in the middle of the site. The applicant will need to verify the 100-year high water level of the wetland. Currently the proposed building elevations are required to be at three feet above the 100-year high water level. The low floor elevation is required to be four feet above the floodplain elevation and three feet above any known groundwater. Staff will continue to work with the applicant on this, if the development moves forward. Ground Water Impacts: The groundwater within the site is likely relatively high which may require additional analysis before finalizing the grading plan and low floor elevations. Soil boring will be required to determine the ground water elevation. Storm Water Management:_ The developer is proposing to have a stormwater management plan through the construction of ponds within the site. The property and area surrounding the property has some drainage issues. The stormwater management on the site should be evaluated to help solve the drainage issues. This might mean the relocation of the proposed stormwater pond as shown on site. Staff will be working with the developer, as this projects moves forward, as it relates to drainage and stormwater management. Staff recommends that the applicant evaluate the potential of using stormwater, for irrigation purposes, within the development. If the system is feasible, from a water availability and design standpoint, it will require additional review and analysis as the project moves forward. Park Dedication The property is served by Oak Shore Park and Bald Eagle -Otter Lake Regional Park. The applicant will be required to pay park dedication fee of $2,400 per new unit which totals $16,800. There are 3 existing lots, so 7 of the lots are considered in the total. 3. CONCLUSION/ RECOMMENDATIONS: Staff recommends that the Commission provide feedback on the sketch plan to the applicant on the following: 1. General Layout 2. Proposed Variance Request for Lots 8 and 9 3. Road Construction Staff is recommending an informational meeting be held with the neighborhood to discuss what a public improvement project would look like and to gage interest from adjacent properties. F.1 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Site Map 2. Engineer's Memo 3. Applicants Narrative 4. Sketch Plan Documents 5. Comments from Adjacent Property Owners 7. 0 U C7 Z W m U) 0 00 00 N ID 0 0 N W U) W W W 00 wsb February 5, 2021 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Drengson Sketch Plan Review (4990 121st Street North) WSB Project No. 016315-000 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the sketch plan for the Drengson Property as prepared by E.G. Rud & Sons, Inc. Based on the review of the documents, we offer the following comments related to this application: General/Access The subject property is located on the north side of 121 st Street between Everton Avenue North and Falcon Avenue North. Access to the site will come from 121st Street, which is a gravel surfaced roadway. With subdivision of property on gravel roadways such as this, the applicant will need to pave the existing roadway from Falcon Avenue to Everton Avenue (approximately 1,500 feet), but not be required to bring the roadway to an urban section with curb and gutter and storm sewer. The roadway can remain a rural section roadway. Properties to the north, east, and west do not require access to be provided from this development, therefore other street connections are not a consideration. Utility Plan 4. Watermain is available to the 121st Street corridor and Drengson Property via the existing watermain located within Everton Avenue. The applicant would need to extend watermain to their east plat line and into their subdivision at their proposed street entrance. 5. Sanitary Sewer Service is available to serve the property as well as other properties within the 121st Street corridor from the MCES 42" Interceptor the extends along the Drengson's west property line. The applicant would need to extend an 8" sanitary sewer within 121st Street into their development and to their east plat line. 6. Other property owners have expressed interest in receiving sewer and/or water service as well. Staff is recommending an informational meeting be held to discuss what a public improvement project would look like and to gage interest from adjacent properties. Stormwater Management/Wetlands 7. This project area has had some recent drainage concerns and past preliminary discussions have occurred with Rice Creek Watershed District on the best means to alleviate these concerns. This will require additional coordination with RCWD. Preferred overall site C:\Users\rachel.juba\NppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\07PY7DSU\LTR-rjuba-Drengson Sketch Plan - 20210205 (002).docx Ms. Rachel Juba February 5, 2021 Page 2 stormwater discharge location would be at the northwest corner to the existing ditch that runs west to an area drain near the intersection of Everest Ave N and 122"d St N. a. Recommend placing stormwater BMP in the northwest corner of the site at the lowest part of the site and near the desired discharge location rather than the high point of the site as shown. 8. Site will be required to provide a water quality treatment volume of 1.1 inches x total area of new or reconstructed impervious. a. If volume reduction practices (infiltration/water reuse) can be used on site, these will be required. b. If volume reduction practices are not feasible, any other BMP type may be used but the TP Factor listed in RCWD Table C1 must be applied to calculate the total water quality treatment volume required. c. Area not treated for phosphorus may not exceed 15% of all new or reconstructed impervious surface. For all untreated surface, TSS must be removed to the maximum extent practicable 9. Peak stormwater runoff rates for the 100-year 24-hour rainfall event is limited to 0.1 cfs/acre. a. Peak stormwater runoff rates for the proposed project must not exceed existing rates for the 2-year and 10-year 24-hour rainfall events using Atlas 14 rainfall depths. 10. The lowest building opening must be 3' above the 100-year HWL and 1' above the EOF of an adjacent BMP. 11. Storm sewer should be designed for a 10-year rainfall event. 12. Applicant will be required to demonstrate compliance with wetland bounce/inundation allowances outlined in RCWD Rule C.8 for the onsite wetland. 13. Site is outside of the 100-year floodplain — no floodplain requirements. 14. Applicant will be required to show compliance with all other RCWD and City of Hugo rules. 15. A wetland delineation on the parcel has been approved. The roadway and lot configuration appear to avoid potential wetland impacts. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463. Sincerely, WSB .' F"e�� Mark Erichson, PE City Engineer cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) C:\Users\rachel.juba\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\I NetCache\Content.Outlook\O7PY7DSU\ LTR-rjuba-Drengson Sketch Plan - 20210205 (002).docx Dan May Jared & Laura Drengson 1853 Birch Lake Ave White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Laura phone: 651-269-6285 Email: ljmayl4@msn.com DRENGSON MAY ADDITION PROTECT NARRATIVE: Prepared February 4, 2021 Introduction/ Overview: This narrative has been prepared to accompany the recent sketch plan application that was submitted on behalf of Dan May and Jared & Laura Drengson. The proposed project lies easterly of Everton Avenue North and northerly of 121st Street North in the City of Hugo. We are proposing to replat the 3 existing parcels, which total 15.15 acres, into 10 single family lots. There is an existing home that would remain on one of the proposed lots (lot 10), which would remain and meet all existing R1 standards. The current parcels are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. The R-1 zoning provides for development density of 1 unit per acre, which is consistent with the sketch plan provided. SKETCH PLAN -for- LAURA AND JARED DRENGSON -n}.998R7215TSTREETNORTH AND JJ •:.�'.•_'.ik 1.i' 1 .. .. .. 1 12165 EVERTGN AVENUE NORTH HUGO, MN 55114 r .. � -------------- ;1 VICINIEI'NNiP _ -4 , l „d '0- iii mom I — I -- — —— — 1----- —- NpF� I I — ' I •' I . L ----T----� r ---T--- ......�r.,w�.r...�. .... I L-----�'7---- ; •t[ C---- —:t I ui` ...... ......... -. .r ... .F_ —y ,�.-Es;,,r— '•+_ 1, x:l, I I a: .. 1 .i ., FIIIIRININE �_--___t______� a �---__—+..w....__y r______a. PRO POSED IONFNBINFORMAn0N SEIYCNS Professional Lana 5, rveyors w %'""" 6776 Lake DflVe NE Suke 110 MIZ '"""`"°" EpSi1NC 10 N1N0'M Lino Lakes, MN 55d14- itl.iA61]]EidEtl FAi �bri]blainl • - • .•�. .. •.. ._. What is your specific request? (Such as, setbacks, lot width, lot size, etc.) Below is a comparison of the R-1 zoning code and the requested variance. Item: Requirement: Requested Deviation: Minimum Lot Width per R-1 150 Feet 30 feet for Lot 9 36.6 feet for Lot 8 This project will adhere to and match all of the following standards, with no deviation needed: • Development Density =1 acre. (Standard met, no deviation needed.) • Minimum Lot Depth = 250 feet (Standard met, no deviation needed.) • Front Setback = 30 feet (Standard met, no deviation needed.) • Side Yard Setback =10 feet (Standard met, no deviation needed.) • Rear Yard Setback = 50 feet (Standard met, no deviation needed.) • Wetland Setback = 30 feet (Standard met, no deviation needed.) What applications do you expect to apply for? • Would there be a need to rezone? If yes, then we would do so. • Review and consideration of the partnership between city, developer, and neighbors to improve 121s' Street North, and construct necessary utilities. • Preliminary Plat Approval. • Final Plat Approval. • Minimum lot width variance for two lots • Are there any other applications needed? This project adjoins 121st Street North, which is one of the few unimproved streets in this neighborhood. It is understood that this street will need to be improved, along with the installation of utilities, in order to develop our parcel. There are existing homes that front and utilize 121st Street. In communicating with these and adjacent neighbors to our property, we have found several have interest in accessing city sewer and/or water as well as having 121st Street paved. It is understood that this improvement project may also provide benefit to said neighboring homes in these ways. We are hoping to collaborate with the City of Hugo to better understand the process and cost sharing/ assessment opportunities that may be associated with this street improvement project. • DRAINAGE CONCERNS FROM NORTHERLY NEIGHBORS: It is understood that there are drainage concerns from the neighboring homes to the north. The proposed layout does lend itself to a pond design on the north end of the project, and it is anticipated that review of the site topography and elevations for the northerly neighboring homes would be taken into consideration with the civil design. What are you asking of the city? What do you want the City to provide feedback on? Provide feedback on the feasibility of approving our project. Provide feedback on the feasibility of city assistance with the improvement of 121st Street and extending municipal services to neighbors Conclusion: Thank you for your assistance and review of our proposed subdivision. We hope this plat will be a welcomed contribution to the City of Hugo and surrounding neighborhoods by adding quality housing and preserving the natural character of the site. Feel free to inquire or reach out to our team if you have any additional questions or needs for the review process. Applicants: Surveyor: Civil Engineer: Jared & Laura Drengson Jason Rud Chuck Plowe Dan May Dan May Jared & Laura Drengson 1853 Birch Lake Ave White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Laura phone: 651-269-6285 Email: ljmayl4@msn.com R-1 Minimum Lot -Width Variance Chapter 90 Article IV Division 1. Sec. 90-96. — Large Lot Single -Family Residential District (R-1). 12165 Everton Ave. N. Hugo, MN PID 31-031-21-43-0001 On behalf of Dan May and the Drengsons, we are asking for a variance from the minimum lot width requirement as stated in the R-1 Large Lot Single -Family Residential code. The current resident owner of the 12165 Everton Ave 5.37 acre property has chosen to subdivide his property into two separate parcels, selling 4.37 acres and retaining his home on 1.0 acre. As the buyers, we are seeking to split the 4.37 acres into two 2+ acre lots. However, due to the unique shape and position of the property, and the current owner's desire to retain his home on the acre which fronts Everton Ave, in purchasing the 4.37 acres, we are left with two access points. One point of entry is on the northern boundary where the lot adjoins Everton Ave. with a frontage of 30ft. The second is the southern point of entry where the lot adjoins 121" with a proposed frontage of 36.6ft. Requirement Requested Deviation Minimum Lot Width at Front Setback Line 150ft Lot 9: 30ft Lot 8: 36.6ft We recognize the deviations from the standard are significant, however, considering the unique position and accessibility, we have come to find this is the most logical and certainly the most nature -preserving method of access to these lots. In being granted this variation, we aim to maintain the quiet nature of the area and placing only two large parcels on the 4.37 acres. We have, thus far, found this to be agreeable to our adjoining neighbors. It should be noted that there are existing parcels which adjoin our project and do not meet the 150 foot lot width requirement. As a result, we feel this request is not a large departure from what exists within the neighborhood today. Providing Municipal Services In providing the two lots in question with city sewer and water, our plan is to bring water and sewer from Everton Ave to the proposed lot 9. We would then bring water up from 121" street to provide for lot 8. This is shown in the sketch below. I DRENGSON I '. ' k ' • NORTH AND •} 'ENUE NORTH J — — \ �. %N1tpt 0+4or} •SAM _tw -_ - - _, ____________. �* tr I r_ :I �./C _ r^�"� I 1Yr4`SR SS ri U+Cff F.legf+alO t .I y Mit ' kuA-7 F, it # I ]•H _ CYAN 7 A�grfcrrr FX &P" * 1 C'}. y�r g ;. !1'IR Ai arf I —I------- oaf ,: F+- _ I* 0.41..I�A6.4CiC}Pua ,� I$LQYlG� T6 V I. IPa Pb}ftr OZLf. # 2y I}s+Lwlct r� I . ♦ s�. �u 7 sNr ---PhaiSOSSD TV R. Thank you all very much for your time and consideration of our project. Sincerely, Dan May Jared & Laura Drengson SKETCH PLAN --for-- LAURA AND JARED DRENGSON �of� 4990 121ST STREET NORTH AND 12165 EVERTON AVENUE NORTH uHr±n 11AA1 ==i 1 A PART OF SEC. 31, TWP. 31, RNG. 21 ®� BALD 12160 I i 92152 12145 EAGLE 12136 12933 '.:'116 I LAKE 1z122 ass2 + I 12101 12096 49L59 4893 4995 12084 I 4950 4970 0% =n WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NO SCALE) NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 1 INCH = 50 FEET M11TEC - A limited amount of field work was performed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 1-29-21. - Bearings shown are on Washington County Coordinate System. - Address Parcel ID Number: 4990 121 ST. N. Hugo, MN 31-031-21-43-0009 Unassigned 121ST ST. N. HUGO, MN 31-031-21-43-0004 12165 Everton Ave. N. Hugo, MN 31-031-21-43-0001 Part of unassigned 121st N. Hugo MN 31-031-21-43-0007 - This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and/or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or an attorney's title opinion. - Surveyed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X (Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.), according to Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 27163CO119E Community No. 270504 Panel No. C0119 Suffix E by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date February 3rd, 2010. - Contours shown are from MNGeo Lidar Topography. - Wetland delineation and location provided by others. UTILITY NOTE - Sanitary sewer and watermain are located along Everton Avenue North. Sanitary Sewer is also located through the site (as shown). Water will need to be connected to Everton Avenue North. 667.5 - 23 .. .. O � 2.6 1 FNDIP6617 416.1 - 3 .0 IF- 100 - -- - 25.0 4 160t 'l I 93 W I �2 1 UJ LU 1 \ ----�- APPROXIMATE R/W LINE I Q I 9,,\ PER WASHINGTON COUNTY; 0 O HALF SECTION MAP /9�s/ : I o OU 1 LU l 4 a 4 I t,9 53,459 S.F. ^� `no�of I a J I (1.23 ACRES) d`O \ 9. � I� 936 .... 99, 376 S.F. <v2 5 - - 160t 1• 143.9 (2.28 ACRES) a<o ! I N I 74,9 S.F. (1.72 ACRES) -r- 30.0 273.9 � ���� 1 WL 1 27 1 28 30,31 V WL c�2'A �z9 o 1 W 26 r 2�0 WL IL 2 O �. 1 T� / \ it T WL 1-30 \ Z '. V ti� / 9S ti119 W 1 all, I . WL 1-2�3 ...�� R�� L1l.H z I, �\, so WL 1-31 �� Ln VF/.10 I ti "'+ Q 43,718 S.F. w 1-23 WL 1-22at - - L1J� (1.00 ACRES) /2/2020 p X 3 ;� 11 93� ..T 3/3/2020 I ry i 3 Go � I V �wL1-zl � I 54,049 S.F. I_- WL 3-4 / I •• o I I WL 1-32 Ln o (1.24 ACRES) 93 F71I i N �I'�, W----( I01,------ ------------ - --- ---------------------------- - ----- wL 3 1( 53. ) `� 2 5 11 20 alr, WL 315 -- I 289.8 ` ♦ :` j 30.0 302.0 X 1------- �' WL1-3 WL3X9END 1 L11 332t �� e \\ \\ I WE 1-19 all, WE 3-7 LIJ WL1-34Ar _ I \ L 1 18 1 $ WL 3-8 � a W l� a O I WL -17 I . 4 m I ---M m kJ J - I O z W 30 o� � o uJ a L 1-35 X I 289. w < ` I O 91,080 S.F. � w • J all, 4 1 �'-,,yl :(2.09 ACRES) o a W I y o m M I Q� M ° 00 O p1 I O '," 1 all, WL 1-36 Obi '� rn �m187S.F. owY I 1 (1.22 ACRES) LL 3:0 3 I I o / ... Mlnm 1 I WL137 I I I/ l/ / N �o M G N 00 �► 0 2 / / ti / p all, Mi F- - , \ \/ , /1 I -1- , n n I WL 1-38 r . , n / I m W 01 p ^ m 44,413 S.F. / vl �� / N ... (.02 RE Ii1/ Imp . " U) ) :I O FNDIP-1/2 WL 2-3 V- 1 \ 85t r WJ2 I j .III, A - UL 1-3900 Q -H WETLAND- ?�`WL112 V 1.8 ! Cal IJ J all, m "' m o 777 d 934 213.7 LATH a w �p� o SETSP1 12.2 O��OT Q 2,600 S.F. (0.06 ACRES) SETSPK z I all, I X X x 1T7 L140 W 937.E o / 299.1 �°° 934.6 �® LATH 14t SETSPKI 1 - I J L'r�/-/-.�II�III dl. I ... ......... SETIP-41578 dl� 1 934.34 935.2 zn S MHSAN m O COTTON22 LL� 1 FNDIP21292 N. ■ ..... 934.8 - 1 dl, 1-41 WL 1 ..r" m i I I _ MAPLE 14 TO BE REMOVE 3$ 935.1 .. MAPLE24 .: .`. ...... .......... .. 15.0 - I Ln WL 1-42 a o m ~•.... ..... 1 x 934.6 3 I WL 1-43 52 238 S.F. - � N _� 44 59 S.F. /8 ! PROPOSED OAK12 ".� 34,51 p - 2 m 1 ACRES) ;° N p U7 O (1.03 ACRES) p CENTERLINE OF of (1.20 upi m o ` FUTURE DRIVEWAY->'I-� �1 1 . .' N �p r I _ I - ' x 934.8 T-:. m I I MAPLE2 - Or1 L 1-44 ........... 6 ` o alL I all, W 0) 1 9�0 . 934.6 - 5.0 �- WL 1-45 30 30 A5H6 = SB ---BLDSB---BLDSB-- SB---BLDSB----BLDSB ----BLDSB---BLDSB--- BLDSB-- BLDS.. LD BLD BLDSB AK12 TO BE REMOVEDJ .L...,... SETIP-41578 _ - •0 _ WL 1-46.: 25 WF 'I •"'•...... 935.3 9�p '0 934. 934.3 _... .WL 1-47 i .• .. ' M 8 6.6 289.6 - 30. 299:1 0 APLE3� 4 -: 9/kZ FNDIP-1/2' SETIP-41578 `9E ..... _ - VVjj���77 " ......... 9 FNDI _U OHU OHU ,-"W-48 END i ND1/2IPOPEN......... I . LATH TSPK n�1 Q .93 O 36 O 935.1 35.2 1/2'OPERYH 935.9.... 935.1 .... 3 t �-I > F ,.935.8 C 935.8 1934. M 93!;-B TREE N . M X3 TO BE REMOVED {./ l .. .. ... ....... ..... ... 356t •A/\ A 036M lJ� 4. L I� 60 60 -- 7777777* \. 9 \ / . '. ... .. ... .... ... ......... .' \ / I. \ / I \ }7 � I/ L / L _ / I \ L -- i L- ' L T / L1 L1J O coIIII +III 936 1 7.. \ L / I'. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION DEVELOPMENT DATA PROPOSED ZONING INFORMATION. SETBACKS. EST.1977 Professional Land Surveyors www.egrud.com 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 [PER WASHINGTON COUNTY'S TAX DESCRIPTION] E1/4-N1/2-SW1/4-SE1/4 EXC S 30 FT FORMERLY BLK 1 SHADYSIDE NO 4 VAC SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 031 RANGE 021. AND PT OF W3/4-N1/2-SW1/4-SE1/4 BEING E 5AC SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 031 RANGE 021. AND PT N1/2-SW1/4-SE1/4 BEING W 3/4 OF ABOVE EXC W 160FT OF S 10OFT OF N 130FT THEREOF AND EXC S 175FT OF W 228.65FT OF E 569.91FT THEREOF AND EXC W 332 FT OF N 150FT OF S 380FT THERE OF AND EXC S 230FT LYG W OF E 569.91FT THEREOF AND EXC E 5AC THEREOF SUB] TO EVERTON AVE N AND 121ST ST N SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 031 RANGE 021. AND THE EAST 15 FEET OF PT W3/4-N1/2-SW1/4-SE1/4 BEING E 86.65FT OF W 228.65FT OF E 569FT OF S 175FT THEREOF SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 031 RANGE 021 TOTAL AREA = 15.17 f ACRES PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS = 10 LOTS PROPOSED NUMBER OF OUTLOTS = 1 OUTLOT RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION = 1.08 f ACRES GROSS DENSITY = 0.66 LOTS PER ACRE NET DENSITY = 0.71 LOTS PER ACRE AVERAGE PROPOSED LOT AREA = 1.40 ACRES WETLAND AREA = 1.48 ACRES TOTAL BUILDABLE AREA = 13.73 ACRES EXISTING ZONING R-1 LARGE LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH SHORELAND DISTRICT OVERLAY OVER A PORTION OF THE SITE. SFR - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH PUD OVERLAY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT AREA = 1 ACRE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK = 150 FEET MINIMUM LOT WIDTH CORNER LOTS = 150 FEET MINIMUM LOT DEPTH = 250 FEET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT = 35 FEET MAXIMUM LOT AREA COVERED BY BUILDING = 20 % MAXIMUM LOT AREA TO BE COVERED BY IMPERVIOUS SURFACE = 35 % MINIMUM PRINCIPAL BUILDING = 960 S.F. VARIANCE REQUEST = 36.6 FEET FOR LOT 8 = 30 FEET FOR LOT 9 FRONT SETBACK = 30 FEET SIDE YARD = 10 FEET REAR YARD = 50 FEET WETLAND = 30 FEET DRAWN BY: JER JOB NO: 20130OPP DATE: 11/30/2020 CHECK BY: JEN FIELD CREW: 1 12/02/20 Rev to Sketch Plan JEN 2 01/22/21 Rev to Sketch Plan JEN 3 01/25/21 Rev to Sketch Plan JEN 4 01/29/21 Rev to Sketch Plan JEN NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY 20130OPP • • Prote '3776 Lino I 'LAN WITH ALK11 ND JARED DRENGSON iT STREET NORTH AND =RTON 4VENUE NORTH III I anal ;e Dri e0-% 11� 1 / ...... I\I I I F( T WIATED \\� 1 3 / O c'P ............... �. 160± \ --- ��-APPROXIMATE PER WASHIN HALF S 1 I 160± i 143.9 a� n �' I N I (1.72 ACRES) -T- 30.0 273.9 Jo • I \ I WL 1-2/7/WL 1-28 I 3031 1 < �O (•_ I V�SSG J O I WL 1-26 WL 1- 1) ET WL.130 / 1 �n W old, ore .. 86 0 8 on I I 11 I WL 1-2�1 tL M L1J n 71! 0 1E --J LW N 10 I00 VL1-31 / sO \m N IL' 1 "{ Q .43,718 S.F. ,r `' il 350.4 O 01 ' 1 J O (1.00 ACRES) tox 3/2/2020 H WET k 3/3/2020 GoI I �F-, WL3-4 54,049 S.F. VWL 1-32 I ' -=- L I 30.0 302.0 Ll_ \ l 1Li 1 1 _ 332± - � I YA 'i dr a I I N (1.24 ACRES) ,.' ElI V _, 289.8 WL 3-1 W.L 3 5 �� .....'' I m // WL 1-33 X WL 3-9 END I WL3-7 WL I-- ...... A7' tp� - / \ I z 'I•.... I ;vim y WL 3-8 +1 • I. ' Q w O I P� a o i wL -1 coM m / O ocl a w 0 30 _ O 2: ti� Ln II I 289.9/ � w Q 8 WL1 35x Lu w91,080 S.F. to \\. ...... o ow(2.09 ACRES) ° Q Q _ \�I o ® 6 J m ® o o rJ m I J W vL 1-3c 53,187S. a00 "' ok (1.22 ACRES) I I r LL �o I w I I I I ;� - a M LU m 3 ♦ WL 1-37 I I I ♦ {All m I I 2 / i O n n IWL1-38 r\ .\ n m co W I01p ^ m 44,413S.F. L I < _ ( 02ACRES): I �I /♦ Imo o 1 / L. — \ / \ / \ / I / I I V y I \ ...L.._ ... I I o .-I i 1 . : Q' •, .... \ / � ij WL 2-385± �% WLI )-'� h X ® �NL 1s39 I I� ,, ___ i89.8 • I I `� � +1 WETLAND - ,� I �, ♦ o cn I ,� I M m O J to � ® a 213.7 c I �n� I x Ste- —x '• 12.2 OUTLOT A a40 S.F. ro©s ACRES) I I : rri L 1-4o W / ~ - W 5�9 214± 1_I I I I ♦ / ilk r ' �I/ 9344 I ♦ I �I ©MH59N I ♦ m • � •. � � 934 -4 �I L 1 1 ao IOL - -r i ( WL1-42 N I\ 15.0 -� � ® 7 '................ I ' (:PROPOSED 44 859 S.F. WL 1-43 52, 238 S.F. ni o m u --- I v 1.20 ACRES °' ;° o 0 9 (1.03 ACRES) c :CENTERLINE OF ( ) I ni m I I �I:FUTURE DRIVEWAYS oop I m ® I *a I ` _ �' .Ln.I WL 1-44 , ................. I i i - f- _ 30 30 -�I 5 . o I --- r LDSB—+---BLDSB-----BLDSB-- WL 1 BLDSB----LDSB-----BLDSB`., L-----BLDSB-----BLDSB-----BLDSQ�'=---BLDSB-----BLDSB' F I !� 25.0 II - WpWL1- ' � ' o 46 10.0�- 48 END j o ��I I o .. 289.636.6. 300`299:1 9 _4-1ST Eo 121ST E N. . .......................... -- - - -- - 356± /� , /i I i� 1 r� r r I n l O Irn L- GO TII L-- y : .. `. '.. `. ,.................. - \ / I \ / I _ L/ ,{I / I \ \ L/ L_ / 1 \ L_ J \ l F< .'1 I K / \ J I F< 1 11 K V L/ L'' / \ I I 1 1 1 \/ I'. ♦ / \ L 1 J \/ \ L 1 L1J L1J I Go. ............ J L 1 I JII �I �� \ .' . i ., F-•'�.h/ \ I I Y: "/ \A 1 1 Eff,yors to 11 a From: Rich Deanan To: Emily Weber Subject: Drengson Development/ Richard Degnan Date: Wednesday, December 9, 2020 4:31:40 PM Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Emily, I have been informed the city has in their possession preliminary plans for the development adjacent to my property. This project will effect my property in many ways and I need to be informed to stay on top of this. This morning I received information and a plot/ plan view of the project. I want to get my concerns out in the open about this proposed layout in it's infancy. I am not apposed to this development but will bring to your attention my concerns as follows. #1 Land requirements per unit. Currently 1 acre required. I am apposed to the reduction unless surrounding properties can benefit from installation of needed infrastructure. #2 I am definitely apposed to the location of the retention pond on south, southeast corner of project abutting my property. The existing property already has a drainage problem on the west boarder, effecting neighbors on that end. I do not want those problems shifted to my back yard raising the water table any where near my property causing basement flooding, stench, mosquitoes, private well or septic issues. This issue should be maintained where it currently exist on the property. #3 Updated topographical of the abutting properties as a whole is needed to address the drainage. Not just the development property boundaries. Currently my property is protected by a buffer of vegetation and woodland allowing rain and snow melt to be contained to the existing property of subject. Without this buffer and the clearing of land around this buffer my concern is my property will be at lowest elevation to all surrounding properties including the road, Falcon Ave. Causing my property to flood. #4 This is the time to address the sewer systems in this area. I believe many home owners are unaware the county has made it impossible for them to sell their properties without updating their septic systems. This area would most likely require unsightly mound systems diminishing the value of their properties and limiting land usages within their property. A comprehensive plan of the entire area should be considered before any development is approved. Including drainage and future utility needs. My interest is to protect our private wells in the area from aging septic systems and replacing them with the same. These systems are not life time systems. I would like to see consideration given to the area as a whole. Please forward this message to the city's planning commission and city council for consideration. I am requesting the city, keep me informed as they proceed. Sincerely, Rich Degnan Sent from my iPad On Oct 22, 2020, at 2:44 PM, Emily Weber <EWeber@ci.hugo.mn.us> wrote: Hi Rich, The City gets their parcel data from the County so I don't have an update on the new owners and there are no applications in right now for development on those parcels. It is R-1 zoning, which requires a minimum lot size of one acre per lot should they want to develop the parcels. Emily From: Rich Degnan [mailto:rdegnanl@hotmail.com] Sent: Thursday, October 22, 2020 2:29 PM To: Emily Weber <EWeber@ci.hugo.mn.us> Subject: Re: Variance Application Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Hi Emily, Rich Degnan here. Wondering if you could share any information on the 10 acres abutting my property. As you recall the old Shoellers place on 121st was sold this past spring. I mentioned to you I'd like to stay informed on any proposed development. I have been watching the Washington County Records Department web site for a change in ownership, but new owners name is not registered on site yet. Are you able to share new owner names and if any discussion about development is underway? Thanks, Rich Sent from my iPad On Apr 15, 2020, at 4:05 PM, Emily Weber <EWeberC@ci.hugo.mn.us> wrote: Hi Rich, See the attached letter in regards to the variance application. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks! EMILY WEBER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT CITY OF HUGO - MINNESOTA 14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N., Hugo, MN 55038 o: 651.762.6311 1 www.ci.hugo.mn.us <Incomplete - Degnan Variance 12160 Falcon Ave 04.15.20.pdf5 CITY of HUGO COMMUNITY 12-18 -2020 DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TO: Hugo Board of Zoning and Planning Commission Members. FROM: Resident, Richard Degnan, 12160 Falcon Ave. N. SUBJECT: Proposed Development, 4990 121 ' St. N. and 12165 Everton Ave. N. Sketch Plan submitted by Laura and Jared Drengson, dated: 12-02-2020 Dear members, My name is Rich Degnan. My family and I have been residents of the city for thirty-seven years. My wife, Cindy and I reside at 12160 Falcon Ave. N. located in the Southwest section of the city. Our three grown children along with seven grandchildren also remain in their hometown of Hugo. When we built our home we were looking for space away from the populated area of White Bear Lake. Back then, Falcon Ave. N. was a dead end gravel road that paralleled Hwy. 61 and the rail line next to it. The long trains would rumble North at a pretty good clip rattling the pictures on our walls. We would walk the open fields to the north with very few houses in site. Good country living, but close to town. It did not last for long as others followed and a housing development was established on the old Gallivan farmland. And the boom was on. We've seen many changes to the area most noticeably the substantial increase in traffic and the home density within the area. We were fortunate enough to secure a one acre parcel of land surrounded by neighboring properties with the same. As you may or may not know this area of the city is zoned R-1.One acre minimum lot size per unit. I am writing you today in an effort to ensure it remains R-1 without exception. A recent sale of a ten acre parcel directly abutting our property to the west has prompted an interest to develop this parcel into a housing project. The proposed sketch plan by the developer in my opinion does not meet the criteria required to proceed without substantial changes to the submitted sketch. Aside from the destruction of century old oak trees and towering pines on the property, the location of a retention pond on the property is an issue. It appears the developer has neglected to adhere to the R-1 zoning in this area. My understanding is the developer is in negotiation to purchase an additional four to five acres to justify the lot sizes indicated on the plan by calculating the GROSS acreage owned to satisfy the required one acre per unit for R-1 zoning. The City of Hugo's 2030 LAND USE PLAN, Chapter 4, (VLDR) Very Low Density Residential section specifically states: Maximum Density ONE unit per NET acres. NOT GROSS acres, NET acres. Gross acres are generally defined as the entire parcel. While NET acres tend to be calculated based on usable land area plus the streets. That being said, in the definition any portion of the property restricted from use as in wetland delineation is not to be considered as part of NET acreage. To be noted the USGA wetland mapping is indicating a substantial portion of the additional four to five acres in negotiation for purchase is also indicated to be wetland area. The difficulty of interpretation of these maps should be examined. Let's be clear, the developer is presenting a plan of eleven home sites concentrated on six NET acres. Located within the initial ten acres purchased. The intent of the R-1 zoning is to prevent this type of manipulation and maintain what it states. One acre per NET unit. There are areas within the city that allow for this type of density, not in a well established area of one acre properties abiding by the R-1 zoning ordinance as in this case. I feel the COVID restrictions will prevent neighboring property owners to participate in a meaningful manner. And the members of the planning commission will base their decisions on feed back or lack there of from the public. For these reasons the proposed sketch as presented should be rejected and resubmitted with the changes required to reflect the intent of the R-1 zoning ordinance and considerate regard to the neighboring properties. Thank you for your thoughtful consideration of this important matter. Sincerely, December 30, 2020 Planning Commission City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue N. Hugo, MN 55038 We are writing regarding a proposed plan for future development in our immediate neighborhood. We live at the corner of 1215t Street North and Falcon Avenue North. Our mailing address is 12116 Falcon Avenue North, White Bear Lake, MN 55110. Our property has 1.07 acres which follows along a portion of the eastern border of the 121�t Street North proposed development. We have reviewed a Sketch Plan for LAURA and 1ARED DRENGSON of 49901211 Street North and 12165 Everton Avenue North, Hugo, MN 55110. Per the sketch plan: • EXISTING ZONING is R-1 Large Lot Single Family Residential with Shoreland District Overlay over a portion of the site. • PROPOSED ZONING INFORMATION is SFR —Single Family Residential with PUD Overlay. We received a letter dated November 30, 2007 from Bryan J. Bear, Community Development Director from City of Hugo informing us that we own land in one of several "large -lot" neighborhoods near Bald Eagle Lake. The area had been discussed by the City's Planning Commission and City Council. Their discussion was to determine how land should be guided in the City's Comprehensive Plan. That current draft of the comprehensive plan designates this area as "very -low density residential" meaning the maximum density for new development in this area will be one unit per acre. Proposed land use designation be consistent with the current zoning for this area, which has a one -acre minimum lot size. With this letter a copy of draft plan dated 11/15/07 text describes Very Low Density Residential (VLDR) and identifies the existing neighborhoods, primarily near Bald Eagle Lake, that were developed at density of approximately 1 unit per acre. It is expected that these neighborhoods will retain the existing suburban development characteristics and would not be expected to allow subdivision at densities less that these existing densities. The City has established the R-1 zoning district with 1-ACRE MINIMUM lot size to reflect the characteristics of these neighborhoods. Some of the properties in this area are currently served by wells and septic. These areas may be served by urban services including sewer and water, sewer only or water depending upon availability. Very Low -Density Residential Guidelines and Criteria • Minimum Density: None • Maximum Density:1 unit per acre • City Utilities: Required for all new development • Also enclosed was a copy of 2030 Land Use Plan (draft) Figure 4-A City of Hugo November 29, 2007 • Land Use Plan lists our property Very Low Density (VLD) We also received a letter dated April 13, 2017 from Rachel Juba, Planner City of Hugo. The letter informed us that the City of Hugo started discussion of 2040 Comprehensive Plan earlier that year. This letter also informed us that we own land that is un-platted within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area (MUSA). Enclosed with the letter was a copy of 2030 Land Use Plan Map 4-A City of Hugo March 15, 2010, the Land Use Plan Map lists our property as Very Low Density (VLD). Review of Zoning Districts Map created by City of Hugo Community Development Department revised 02/06/2020 now lists our property R-1 Large Lot Single Family Residential. During a recent conversation with Rachel Juba, Planner City of Hugo we questioned the zoning change. We were told that the terms used are different, one term is used by Metropolitan Council and one term is often used by a City. Therefore, the zoning is essentially one in the same. Our concerns regarding Planned Land Use for the proposed development are: 1. Lot sizes of significantly less than 1 acre. 2. Sketch Plan shows building of homes in very close proximity to one another (cluster housing). 3. The utilization of two separate and distinct parcels of land to meet the minimum of net one acre lots. The parcels have been subdivided in highly unequal proportions. The 5.64 acre parcel only has three lots, while the 9.78 acre parcel has been proposed at eleven lots. 4. A proposed large holding pond, concerns that this will cause drainage and runoff problems. 5. What plans are in place for maintaining this holding pond? 6. What is the planned access to lots #12, #13, #14? 7. What buffers are planned for existing neighbors? 8. Much of property is deemed wetland. 9. Increase traffic volume to 121st Street North. (Dirt Road) 10. Construction - Heavy Trucks will cause damage to existing dirt road (121s` Street North). Can the Public Works Department, City of Hugo maintain 121" Street North properly? (includes grading and calcium chloride treatments?) More than one time per Summer. 11. Are plans confirmed that city sewer can be utilized as required by Plan Land Use? 12. Is the City of Hugo prepared to offer city water? Is the existing infrastructure able to handle the demand for water including enough water pressure for fire protection? 13. Will our private well be compromised? 14. What about future drought conditions and water demand? 15. Will our private sewer be impacted? 16. No parkland dedication listed on proposal as required by City of Hugo Land Division & Platting Article VII Sec. 90-324. 17. Loss of rural feeling in the existing neighborhood. 18. Loss to existing wildlife and their habitat. 19. Likely Destruction of several 200 year -old oaks and pines. 20. Are the current owner and developers of this property making plans to live within the proposed site? R pectfully your Thomas J. and Denise B. Sames 12116 Falcon Avenue North White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Cellphone: 612-210-8280 (Tom) or 612-759-5342 (Denise) Email: samesd@q.com From: Tom To: Emily Weber Cc: Trese Subject: Drengson Development Plans Date: Monday, December 7, 2020 3:55:26 PM Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Thank you Emily for sending the sketch plan. We are both very disappointed in what we see. I know you are just the messenger... Is it OK for me to send the sketch plan to our neighbors? We have many questions. Let us set up a time when it works for you to give you a call. Some of our questions: 1. 1 see lots smaller than 1 acre, 14 lots in all. You and Rachael Juba both said these two properties could never have more than 10 lots ever. You said 1 unit per acre max. Why is this development even proposed in this manner then? I see additional land besides the two lots being part of this proposal, is that why? 2. For subdivided development to move forward I was told by you that 1215t Street would need to be paved. Is that still a requirement? The road would need to be widened if so. Drainage would also be required. This appears to be difficult. What is the developers plan to make this happen? Are the existing property owners to be assessed? 3. Also for subdivided development to move forward I was told by you that new development would need to have city water and sewer. Is this still true? 4. Would there be any restriction on the size of dwellings allowed? 5. If the city approves this, how much do the neighboring property owners, such as us, have to say in whether this plan goes through or not? Thankyou Tom From: Emily Weber Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 2:27 PM To: 'Tom' Cc:Trese Subject: RE: 12160 Falcon Ave N Variance The sketch plan is attached. This is a very early submittal and staff has yet to review it. Please call me and I'd be happy to discuss the sketch plan review process and participation. Thanks! EMILY WEBER COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANT CITY OF HUGO - MINNESOTA 14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N., Hugo, MN 55038 o: 651.762.63111 www.ci.hugo.mn.us From: Tom [mailto:wave2000@aol.com] Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 1:25 PM To: Emily Weber <EWeber@ci.hugo.mn.us> Cc: Trese <gromit618@aol.com> Subject: RE: 12160 Falcon Ave N Variance Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Thanks Emily Can you send me the plan, I'm guessing not? What are the steps involved? At what point can neighbors inject their thoughts? Thank you! Tom From: Emily Weber Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 1:00 PM To: 'Tom' Cc: Trese Subject: RE: 12160 Falcon Ave N Variance Hi Tom, There is a sketch plan submitted for those two parcels but it has yet to be scheduled for a Planning Commission meeting. The sketch plan application does not allow for any formal approvals but allows staff and the Commissioners to comment on the proposal. Feel free to call me with any additional questions. Thanks, 2021 Goals Planning Commission Approved by the Planning Commission at its Thursday, , 2021, meeting G.1 • Schedule regular Ordinance Review Committee (ORC) meetings • Evaluate and revise the shoreland, subdivision, and PUD sections of the City Code • Schedule Planning Commission meeting procedures and land use training • Review and evaluate the Commercial and Industrial Design Guidleines related to new trends for building materials. • Monitor trends in planning and developments due to the Covid-19 pandemic • Evaluate devleopment fees • Implementation of Comprehensive Plan • Update ordinances/policies to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan • Discuss area planning on 17oth Street and Highway 61