The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutParks Packet 07.15.20Agenda Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission Meeting of July 15, 2020 Hugo City Hall, 7:00 pm This meeting will be held remotely pursuant to MN Statute Sec. 13D.021. Anyone who wishes to speak at the meeting is strongly encouraged to make arrangements by 4:30 pm on the meeting day by contacting Parks Planner Shayla Denaway at 651-762-6342. For more information on the remote meeting and participation, go to https://www.ci.hugo.mn.us/participate. Meeting ID: 832 3720 5282 7:00 pm 1. Approve Minutes from June 17, 2020 Meeting 7:02 pm 2. Oneka Lake Reserve Park Dedication 7:25 pm 3. Andrew Olson Memorial Proposal 7:45 pm 4. Lions Park Master Plan 8:00 pm 5. Adjournment Page 1 of 3 Parks Commission Agenda July 15, 2020 Background Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission Meeting of July 15, 2020 Hugo City Hall, 7:00 pm Approve Minutes from June 17, 2020 Meeting Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the Parks Commission meeting of June 17, 2020. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED MINUTES. Oneka Lake Reserve Park Dedication Oneka Lake Reserve, LLC has submitted an application requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) amendment for a residential development to be known as "Oneka Lake Reserve". The development consists of 44 attached townhomes in a mix of 3 and 4 unit two-story buildings located north of 150t" Street. The development also includes a private drive, a public neighborhood park, stormwater re -use, and sidewalks. The developer is proposing to dedicate park land to satisfy park dedication and construct park amenities in exchange for PUD flexibility. Staff recommends acceptance of .65 acres of park land to satisfy park dedication requirements and the remainder to be paid in fees. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED MEMO. Andrew Olson Memorial Proposal Logan Jensen, a local Boy Scout, has asked about planting a memorial tree or installing a bench in honor of his friend and fellow Scout, Andrew Olson. Olson passed away unexpectedly in February. The City of Hugo has a Memorial Policy which makes memorials in parks possible. The policy specifies that the Parks Commission shall review and approve proposed memorials. Jensen is proposing to install a tree or bench. Similar to memorials in other parks, a bronze plaque would be installed near the tree. Jensen is raising funds and coordinating the memorial with the help of his Boy Scout troop. Staff recommends that SHIP funding be used to cover the cost of the bench to be installed near Oenka Lake Park and approval of the memorial. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED REQUEST AND MEMORIAL POLICY. Lions Park Master Plan Development Guidelines for Lions Park were approved by the City Council on November 15, 2011. A Preliminary Master Plan for Lions Park was approved by the City Council March 2, 2014. On May 13, 2019 the City Council and Parks Commission held a workshop to discuss funding of community parks. The City Council and Parks Commission discussed parks usage, phasing and prioritizing of park improvements, and funding options. At the meeting of June 19, 2019 the Parks Commission identified their priorities for community park development. This was later presented to the City Council at their budget workshop on September 5, 2019. The City Council included "prepare for and begin construction of new Lions Park" on their goals for 2020. Page 2 of 3 Parks Commission Agenda July 15, 2020 The Parks Commission discussed a work plan for Lions Park at their February 19, 2020 meeting. The first step was a feasibility study which included a master plan updates, phasing plan, and update cost estimates. The Hugo City Council approved the feasibility study at their April 20, 2020 with their discussion on the Road Capital Improvement Plan. The Parks Commission reviewed three versions of the preliminary master plan that included updates related to the surrounding developments and roadways at their meeting of June 17, 2020. A joint workshop was held with the City Council and Parks Commission on June 29, 2020. The input gathered has been compiled into a Final Master Plan. Staff recommends approval of the Lions Park Master Plan and authorization of next steps. THE UPDATED LIONS PARK MASTER PLAN IS ATTACHED. THE PARKS PLAN CAN BE FOUND AT: https://www.ci.hugo.mn.us/2040compplan Page 3 of 3 Parks Commission Agenda July 15, 2020 Minutes Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission Meeting of June 17, 2020 Hugo City Hall, 7:00 pm Meeting held remotely pursuant to Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.021 Present: Roger Clarke, Shawn Haag, Cathy Moore — Arcand, Nicole Schmid, Dave Strub, Ranell Tennyson Absent: Mat Rauschendorfer Staff Present: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director Shayla Denaway, Parks Planner Strub called the meeting to order at 7:03 pm. 1. Approval of Minutes from the May 20, 2020 Meeting Moore —Arcand made a motion, Haag seconded to approve the minutes of the May 20, 2020 Parks Commission Meeting with a correction made to the date listed under the Lions Park Feasibility Study for the Parks Commission Meeting be changed from June 18, 2020 to June 17, 2020. Ayes: Shawn Haag, Cathy Moore —Arcand, Nicole Schmid, Dave Strub, Ranell Tennyson Motion carried. Clarke joined remote meeting. 2. Lions Park Feasibility Study Development Guidelines for Lions Park were approved by the City Council on November 15, 2011 and a Preliminary Master Plan for Lions Park was approved on March 2, 2014. On May 13, 2019 the City Council and Parks Commission held a workshop to discuss funding of community parks. At the meeting of June 19, 2019 the Parks Commission identified their priorities for community park development and these priorities were presented to the City Council at their budget workshop on September 5, 2019. The City Council included "prepare for and begin construction of new Lions Park" on their goals for 2020. The Parks Commission discussed a work plan for Lions Park at their February 19, 2020 meeting. The first step was a feasibility study which included master plan updates, a phasing plan, and updated cost estimates. The Hugo City Council approved the feasibility study at their April 20, 2020 meeting with their discussion on the Road Capital Improvement Plan. As the first step in the feasibility study Candace Amberg, with WSB and Associates, presented three concepts plans to the Parks Commission that included minor revisions to the Preliminary Master Plan. Amberg shared Page 1 of 4 Parks Commission Minutes June 17, 2020 that the goal is to look at various options and find a preferred approach to get one plan together. After that will come the next steps in the design process and starting to work with an architect to figure out what options the main park multiple use building should include. All options included modifying the parking lot on the west side to accommodate the Hugo Gardens Apartment development. Additional parking was added along the streets. A possible storage building was shown. The main pavilion was in the same location with an optional fire pit area. An alignment of 1471h Street that includes a trail on the north side was show. Each of the three options showed different configurations of the City Hall parking lot, pavilion and play features. Option 1 closely followed the original master plan included both playground and splash pad options and allowed for the possibility of moving the ballfield away from the playground. Option 2 removed the splash pad and allowed for a larger playground. Changes to the parking lot at City Hall were shown that would make it a through road. Also shown were changes to the memorial space and a smaller fire pit area next to the pavilion. Option 3 added an interactive water feature and changed the location of the fire pit area. Also, a traffic circle was placed in the City Hall parking lot to help slow traffic. Parks Planner Shayla Denaway provided an update on 147th Street. Staff is working closely with the Hugo Gardens Apartment development on the construction of Finale Avenue. The City is looking at 1471h Street as a future road improvement project but there are issues with the amount of right-of-way on 1471h Street which complicates the placement of the trail. The City Council would prefer that the trail be located on the north side of 1471h Street and Staff will be talking with property owners about easements to require the necessary right-of-way. Denaway will provide updates to the Commission when available. Amberg provided updated costs to the Commission. Currently, the costs are just budgetary figures and will change as things progress. The main park multiple use building has a wide price range depending on what options the Commission chooses. An inclusive playground would also add a large expense. Commissioners Strub and Moore —Arcand preferred the City Hall parking lot arrangement in Option 1 and felt that Fitzgerald Avenue should not be a through street. Moore—Arcand was concerned about the limited amount of close parking spaces to the City Hall building. Commissioner Tennyson favored keeping the ballfield close to the playground so that parents would be able to watch children who wanted to do different activities. Moore — Arcand agreed that was a good idea. Commissioner Strub believed that there would be various outside organizations, like Veteran groups, that would help fund the memorial. Strub also commented the he liked the idea of the fire pit area and questioned if infrastructure was figured in to the plan for Good Neighbor Days. The Commissioners discussed the differences between a splash pad and an interactive water feature. They also discussed the differences between a flow through system and a recirculating system. It was the overall consensus of the Parks Commission that they would like to include a water feature in the master plan. The Commissioners felt that it was important to have a feature like this to draw in the community and to help revitalize the downtown area. Denaway stated that a joint workshop with the City Council to discuss the Lions Park Feasibility Study and to review the concepts and cost estimates is scheduled for Monday, June 29, 2020. Page 2 of 4 Parks Commission Minutes June 17, 2020 3. Proposed Public Works Facility Public Works Director Scott Anderson gave an update on the proposed Public Works Facility that could possibly be constructed on 10 to 15 acres of the 125 acre Irish Avenue Park. Staff and Consultants have been working hard on the design of the proposed facility and now with most of the major components in place, they are looking more closely at the small details. Letters have been mailed to residents surrounding Irish Avenue Park and notices have been posted in the park notifying neighbors and park users of a Neighborhood Meeting scheduled for Thursday, June 18, 2020 with the City Council. Anderson encouraged the Commissioners to attend the meeting. Anderson shared new renderings of the proposed facility that showed various outside adjustments, including the placement of trees, the size of the asphalt drive and the location of the salt storage shed. He noted that they are leaving room for feature expansion on the site. Commissioner Clarke and Anderson met on location to walk the current trails and to discuss the placement of new trails. Anderson shared a map of the park that showed existing trails and options for new trails. Clarke said he believes that changing the placement of some of the trails, along with the addition of new trails would add enticements like varied routes, curves and shade, and some diversity for viewing trees and flowers. Commissioner Strub asked about access to the park and if it would only be from Irish Avenue or if the public would be able to use the Public Works Facility parking lot. Anderson said that the parking lot by the facility would be open to the public and have a trail that leaves the parking lot and connects to the rest of the trails in the park. The Commissioners all agreed that they would like to see a trail around the facility and stated that they liked the added trail options. 4. Clearwater Creek Preserve/JD 3 Update Parks Planner Shayla Denaway provided an update regarding the Judicial Ditch No. 3 repair project being undertaken by the Rice Creek Watershed District (RCWD) in Clearwater Creek Preserve that was initially discussed at the February 19, 2020 Parks Commission Meeting. RCWD is moving ahead with the ditch maintenance project and will be creating a maintenance path to access the ditch for cleaning. As agreed upon in initial discussions, RCWD will construct the maintenance path in a location that will help improve the use of the park by residents. RCWD will be installing two culverts with a maintenance path on top that will also double as a trail so that pedestrians can access the park and heavy equipment will be able to access the ditch for future maintenance. This will enhance the use of the park and create opportunities for the City to construct additional walking paths. RCWD has asked for an agreement to use the main entrance of the park for access and will start the project in a couple of weeks. Commissioner Clarke mentioned that RCWD is providing a huge benefit for the City by installing the maintenance path in a manner that can double as a pedestrian path because these trails would be very expensive to construct as part of the Master Plan. 5. Recreation Program Update Parks Planer Shayla Denaway shared with the Commission that the COVID-19 pandemic has caused several recreation opportunities in Hugo to be cancelled, but with Governor Walz relaxing the Stay At Home Order some programs have been able to resume. Page 3 of 4 Parks Commission Minutes June 17, 2020 On June 10, 2020 the fields at Hanifl opened and the Associations provided return to play plans with phased approaches. White Bear Lake Area School District has also implemented many policies for their programing, along with field use policies which are consistent with the City's policies. There is an interested party proposing an adult flag football league at Lions Park and Staff is working with them on a permit. Youth enrichment camps are now being held, however they have moved to Otter Lake Elementary School. Hugo residents can still participate; the programs were moved from City community rooms to Otter Lake so that the camp leaders would be better able to control the environment. Washington County Library has suspended all programs throughout the summer, but they are providing virtual programing and are currently opening up a limited amount of spaces for in-house library use. In the fall, Staff believes that they will hold Story Hour at Hugo Elementary School. The Forest Lake YMCA has been doing a lot of great work during the pandemic. They are providing meals and outreach to seniors in the community and in Hugo they have opened up Park Play Days as scheduled and are playing outside at Hanifl Fields Monday thru Thursday with about a dozen kids participating. Commissioner Tennyson shared that the YMCA is looking for volunteers, both to help deliver the meals to seniors and to also provide financial assistance for the program. 6. Adjournment Moore — Arcand made a motion, Schmid seconded to adjourn the meeting at 8:36 pm. Ayes: Roger Clarke, Shawn Haag, Cathy Moore—Arcand, Nicole Schmid, Dave Strub, Ranell Tennyson Motion carried. Page 4 of 4 Parks Commission Minutes June 17, 2020 Agenda Number: 2 CITY OF HUGO PARKS COMMISSION REPORT TO: City of Hugo Parks, Recreation and Open Space Commission FROM: Shayla Denaway, Parks Planner SUBJECT: Oneka Lake Reserve, LLC. Request for a PUD and Preliminary Plat for "Oneka Lake Reserve" DATE: July 6, 2020 for the Parks Commission meeting of July 17, 2020 1. DESCRIPTION: Oneka Lake Reserve, LLC has submitted an application requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a residential development. The property totals 6.7 acres and located north of 150t' Street North and Generation Avenue North. The preliminary plat includes 44 attached townhomes and a public park. The plan includes residential units, a private drive, a public neighborhood park, stormwater re -use (community irrigation and infiltration basins) and sidewalks. The proposed development includes a mix of 3 and 4 unit two-story buildings. The property is currently zoned (R-4) and will be rezoned Planned Unit Development (PUD). The properties to the south, east and west are zoned (R-4) and include the Generation Acres Townhomes, Hugo Estates mobile home park, and Oneka Lake View Townhomes. The property to the north is zoned (R-3) Single Family Detached Residential and is the Sweet Grass Meadows development. The property does not include wetlands and totals 6.05 net acres and a .65 acre public park. The applicant is requesting flexibility from the standard zoning code with the PUD for increased density and building setbacks. The density can be increased to eight units per acre under a PUD. The developer proposes to rezone the property to PUD in part to allow a gross density of 6.6 units per acre. The density net of the park dedication is 7.3 units per acre. -1- Oneka Lake Reserve July 17, 2020 2. PARK DEDICATION: The developer is required to dedicate land, pay a fee, or a combination of land and fee to satisfy park dedication per Sec. 90-324 of the City Code. The applicant is required to dedicate 13% of the developable acres for park land with a density of 6.00- 7.99 units per acre. The developer has indicated that there are 6.7 acres of buildable land in the development. Therefore, the developer is required to dedicate .87 acres of park land. The current park dedication fee is $2,400 per unit. If a fee is preferable, with 44 units, the park dedication fee would be $105,600. The developer is proposing to dedicate land to satisfy the park dedication requirements and to build park amenities in exchange for PUD flexibility. The proposed land dedication of .65 acres satisfies 75% of the requirement. The remaining 25% should be satisfied with payment of the fee at $600 per unit which would total $26,400 with 44 units. 3. CONSISTENCY WITH PARK PLAN Parks/ Open Space The developer is proposing to dedicate a park at the southwest corner of the development. The developer is also proposing to construct park amenities including a playground, gazebo with picnic tables, and a "trike track" in exchange for PUD flexibility. This development is in Neighborhood Park Service Area 10 which includes Oneka Lake Park, the Bernin property, and DNR boat launch. Oneka Lake Park is .6 miles distance from the neighborhood. The case could be made that due to the density in the immediate neighborhood, additional park amenities are desirable. The neighborhoods to the south and west would have easy access to the park. Trails The Existing and Proposed Trails Map does not show a trail in the area. However, the developer is showing sidewalks to be constructed along 1501h Street and into the development. This would connect to the existing sidewalk on Generation Avenue to the south and eventually the trail on Oneka Lake Boulevard. A sidewalk loop is to be -2- Oneka Lake Reserve July 17, 2020 constructed in the development which is nicely setback from the street. Sidewalks are required to be built in developments with lots less than 80' wide (Sec. 90-336). 4. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Parks Commission approve dedication of the .65 acre park and payment of fees. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Cover Page received June 19, 2020 3. Landscape Plan received June 19, 2020 4. Applicant's Narrative received June 5, 2020 5. Park Dedication Policy 6. Existing and Proposed Trail Map 7. Neighborhood Park Service Area Map -3- Oneka Lake Reserve July 17, 2020 <—,,� s ..,. I� 1 _ LL �1 LLk Right of Way Roads _I Hugo Border Parcel Boundary t'-, CFFY OF V� VVEST. 180E L- C' Oneka Lake Resrve Location Map Hugo, MN L -Lji L N 0 200 Feet 1 in = 200 feet ' II I 1 II 1j I I 11 _ \ ____ \ _ -- 1 �_____________11 E 1 11 —_----- — — _ __ IXISTING w I I POND I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I YI I I\ I I I I I I I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I D----- 1 I — — � 1 ,--- ---- — ' `----1— ' `--- _1_ ' I II ----- -- ---1----, r- II I I I I I � I rr r i , -- \ Y \ GENERATION AVENDE N I \ r ,r ,r • , Y r, I 1 — ------------------------------------- — — — --------------------------. NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP m LOCATION MAP PROJECT CONTACTS SHEET INDEX SITE �ER Tres„. -I "aG�� S7EV-HNSTCN PE Tre,zlzeo•nez N.REz, Tre11— oe 6 res,En ENE A.E TE.I.— ,.:N DNO=EETN,: ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO - MINNESOTA PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, VACATION AND REZONING REVIEW J U N E 5, 2020 I ONEKA LAKE RESERVE, LLC. 12928 JODY AVE. N HUGO, MN 55D38 651-303-0471 Recervee Ey CiTy of Hugo 06.19.20 zaolg, zaozo, >wo,. zaozl ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, VACATION AND REZONING REVIEW � L4M COVER SHEET C-000 PPO1E1 i SCH18002 WAM rmi 01 FIA, WIN LE MEN M -M W-4 M LE-0-0 i i 10 in mwwmmm ........ WIN!! ■ in . ........ ... k" ONEKA LAKE RESERVE, LLC. 12928 JODY AVE. N HUGO, MN S5038 651-303-0 71 <34#Q #6ug4VwWxlnh#153# P lgghdsrdv/}P Q#O8734# 141c#0451593L <; 3# id{#V451593L• <<3# z z z lhcdgcdelfrp # June 5, 2020 City of Hugo Mayor, City Council, Parks Commission and Planning Commission c/o Rachel Juba Community Development Director 14669 Fitzgerald Ave N Hugo, MN 55038 Oneka Lake Reserve Subdivision RE: Project Narrative Greetings: On behalf of our client, Oneka Lake Reserve, LLC, we are pleased to present the proposed Oneka Lake Reserve neighborhood, a community of 44 attached townhomes. The neighborhood is located north of 150t" Street North at the extension of Generation Avenue. The Generation Acres townhome development lies to the south, Oneka Lake View townhome development is to the south east, Oneka, Lake View North townhomes to the east, Sweet Grass Meadows single family to the north and the Hugo Estates manufactured home park to the west. To the northwest of the site is an industrial park and to the southwest is the New Life Church. The site was previously approved and platted as a 30 unit townhome development named Oneka Lake Townhomes 2nd Addition. That project never went forward due to the 2008 recession. Between 2008 and 2010 the previous property owner commissioned a hydrologic study that concluded that areas previously designated as wetlands lacked the hydrology necessary to be classified as wetlands. A Technical Evaluation Committee (TEP) agreed with the finding that there are no wetlands on the site. Without the wetlands to work around it is desirable to increase the overall density of the project to match the density of the adjacent townhome developments and facilitate housing affordability. The proposed development includes 44 units in a mixture of 3 and 4 unit buildings. Each —2,300 ftZ, two story unit has three bedrooms and 2 % baths including a main floor master bedroom. Each unit has an attached 2-car garage. Building materials include maintenance free vinyl siding, stone and aluminum soffit and fascia. The homes would be accessed via a privately owned and maintained street that is aligned with Generation Avenue. The proposed street width is 24 feet with 18 - 8 foot wide shared guest parking stalls. Each unit has two additional guest parking stalls located in front of their garage. A 5 foot wide concrete sidewalk is provided on one side of the private drive. A 6 foot wide sidewalk is shown along 150t" Street N. The private drive is located within a 50 foot wide outlot to be owned collectively by the homeowners. Other than width and designated parking stalls the private drive will be built to the same construction standards as city owned and maintained streets. V 14M qdd vhr# #0 algglgj ##W ly]* qj lghhulgj #Mdggvfdsh#V LM41fwah4# F rgvwxfvlrq##lhuylfhv# RE: Oneka Lake Reserve June 5, 2020 The developer proposes to construct a public neighborhood park in the southwest corner of the site. The park has been designed to serve the anticipate needs of young families and visiting grandchildren within this neighborhood and the surrounding area. Park amenities shown on the plans include a playground with equipment designed for younger children, a gazebo with picnic tables for smaller gatherings and a trike track to give the youngsters a place to ride safely. It is proposed that the land for the park satisfy the developer's park dedication requirements with the park facilities provided as part of the PUD. We will work with the city staff and Park Commission to develop a mutually agreeable plan. Stormwater will be managed with a combination of infiltration basins and as suggested by city staff an expansion of open water ponds on adjoining properties into this site. Water from these ponds will be utilized for a centralized irrigation system. The development will be served by publicly owned utilities installed to city standards within an easement under the roadway. The 44 townhomes can be expected to generate on average 8 trips per unit per day or 352 total. The park will generate minimal vehicular traffic. ZONING The site and the properties to the south, west and east are presently zoned R-4 Low Density Multiple Family Residential. The properties to the southwest are zoned CR-3 Central Residential. To the northwest the property is zoned 1-3 General Industrial. The property to the north is zoned R-3 Single Family Detached Residential. The R-4 District permits the townhomes as proposed at a density of three to six units per acre. The density can be increased to eight units per acre under a PUD. The developer proposes to rezone the property to PUD in part to allow a gross density of 6.6 units per acre. The density net of the park dedication is 7.3 units per acre. In addition to an increase in density, rezoning to PUD is necessary to allow the proposed private street and flexibility for building setbacks. The following design standards are proposed for the development site. Standard R-4 Requirement Proposed PUD Minimum lot or parcel size 1 acre 6.7 acres Minimum lot width at setback 150 feet 440 feet Minimum lot depth 150 feet 663 feet Minimum front yard building setback 25 feet 25 feet Minimum side yard building setback 15 feet 25 feet Minimum rear yard building setback 25 feet 25 feet Maximum building height 35 feet 25 feet Maximum lot area covered by buildings 40 % 30 % Maximum lot area covered by impervious surfaces 70 % 60 % Minimum building size of principal building 960 sq. ft. / unit 2,300 sq. ft. / unit Page 2 of 6 RE: Oneka Lake Reserve June 5, 2020 Within the development the following design standards are proposed. Standard Proposed PUD Street outlot width 50 feet Street Width 26 feet - back to back On street shared guest parking 8' x 23' Sidewalk width 5 feet Boulevard width — walk to curb 8 feet Boulevard width — property line to curb (w/ walk) 15.5 feet Boulevard width — property line to curb (no walk) 8.5 feet Building setback to curb (minimum) 12 feet Building setback to sidewalk (minimum) 14 feet Garage setback to property line (minimum) 20 feet Side setback between buildings (minimum) 20 feet Rear setback between buildings (minimum) 44 feet Parking is provided as follows. The proposed parking exceeds the minimum requirements. Type Number of stalls Stalls / Unit Garage 88 2 Private guest 88 2 Shared guest 18 0.4 Total 194 4.4 Section 90-141 of the City's Zoning and Land Use regulations requires the following criteria as justification for the use of Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning for the proposed residential development. Criteria (1) The establishment of PUD zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations, to create or maintain a development pattern that complies with the city's comprehensive plan. Response: The proposed development is located between a single family detached development to the north at a density of 2.5 units/acre, an attached townhome development to the east at a density of 6.5 units per acre, an attached townhome development to the south at a density of 6.5 units/acre, and an manufactured home park to the west at a density of 5.8 units/acre. Through the use of a PUD it is proposed to develop this site at a gross density of 6.6 units/acre. Page 3 of 6 Z!�4-�h ❑ E 9 1 G N RE: Oneka Lake Reserve June 5, 2020 Criteria (2) The mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land uses could not otherwise be accomplished under this chapter. Response: The project does not include a mixture of land uses but does provide a variant of townhome that does not presently exist in the area. The townhomes to the east and south east are back to back townhomes with 4 units per building. The townhomes to the south are single loaded similar to the buildings proposed for this neighborhood but they are split entry units most suitable for younger homeowners. The homes proposed for this neighborhood provide a main level master bedroom desired by many buyers, especially older residents. Criteria (3) Variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in this chapter in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements (e.g., construction materials, landscaping, lighting, open space, etc.) that exceed the city's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Response: The proposed development includes a neighborhood park designed to serve younger children that either live in the area or that are visiting grandparents. The park land itself is intended to fulfill park dedication requirements. The developer proposes to construct the improvements shown on the landscape plan at their cost as part of the PUD. These improvements include a paved trike track/walking path, playground, picnic tables and gazebo. In addition to the park the developer plans an attractive landscape that exceeds city requirements. The development's density would drop precipitously if it was necessary to provide a public right of way and standard setbacks. At the proposed density the cost of land and infrastructure is spread over more units improving affordability. Criteria (4) A more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the city. Response: The project has been designed with a private street system that will be maintained by a homeowners associates thus saving city tax payers that expense. The narrower than typical streets with designated parallel bays will help calm traffic. By reducing the building setback it is feasible to loop the street on this relatively narrow site, thereby providing alternative routes in an emergency situation. Criteria (5) Preservation and enhancement of natural features and open spaces, including but not limited to the width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas, development of buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint facilities and utilities. Response: The site is generally void of natural features. The quality trees planted in the southwest corner of the site will be preserved within the park. The proposed stormwater management plan expands and joins the ponds in two neighboring developments improving the aesthetics and creating additional wildlife habitat. Criteria (6) Maintenance or improvement for the efficiency of public streets and utilities. Response: The creation of a private street system reduces public expenditures per capita for maintenance. The utilities are proposed to be publicly owned and maintained. Page 4of6 Z!�4-�h ❑ E 9 1 G N RE: Oneka Lake Reserve June 5, 2020 Criteria (7) Establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. Response: Side setbacks between this neighborhood and the existing have been increased from 15 to 25 feet. Preservation of existing trees in the southwest corner of the site, additional landscaping and a privacy fence provide a transition between this site and the manufactured home park to the west. The expanded pond and shifting townhomes west and south creates a greater separation from the detached single family homes to the north. The land uses to the east and south are similar. MULTI -FAMILY DEVELOPMENT DESIGN GUIDELINES. On December 19, 2005 the city adopted guidelines for Multi -family developments. These guidelines are intended to help developers visualize the city's vision for the community. The developer has worked with staff to address these guidelines going so far as to completely change the building design and with it the site plan. Some of the site design standards presented in the guideline relating to articulation and variable setbacks cannot be practically met on this small sites but the desired streetscape is achievable The neighborhood has been designed with a relatively narrow looped street system with parallel parking bays, which combined with concrete sidewalks, tree lined boulevards and minimal building setbacks creates a warm inviting neighborhood. The proposed townhomes appear to be single level homes with a tall roof line from the street. The front facade is a mixture of lap siding, a stone wainscot, shake shingled gables and wide trim boards. Grids are installed in the windows to add interest along with the carriage garage doors. The siding is two -toned using a lighter color above the base. The same two-tone lap siding and trim are visible on the other elevations reducing the apparent height of the structure. The 40 foot wide units are designed with an 18 foot wide living space that juts out 8'-6" from the garage to the street. The outside corners of the building are living space preventing the garage doors from being seen from the side of the building. The street design provides traffic calming and avoids the creation of a cul-de-sac. A sidewalk along both the private drive and 150th Street provide access to the park. The guidelines indicate private streets are not allowed in Hugo but staff has indicated support for the concept. The guidelines call for 22' long driveways, through the garage back design of the units this is achieved. Two garage stalls are provided for each unit. The association documents will limit driveway and shared street stall parking. The common open space required by code has been enhanced by making it available to all of the surrounding neighborhood. Attractive landscaping is provided and will be maintained by the homeowner's association. All of the grounds will be irrigated with reused storm water. Page 5 of 6 Z!�4-�h ❑ E 9 1 G N RE: Oneka Lake Reserve June 5, 2020 If you need additional information do not hesitate to contact me. Sincerely, e�� Steve Johnston, PE Principal Engineer Cc: Elan File #SCH18002 Norm Dupre Page 6 of 6 Municode http: //library municode.com/print. aspx?h=&clientlD=143 56&HTNMeque... Sec. 90-324. - Park dedication. (a) General dedication standards. In order to develop a system of parks within the community to serve the public's health and recreational needs, a percentage of the net buildable acreage based on the density of all land subdivided for residential purposes shall be dedicated to the city as public parkland. The city finds that the more dense a development is, the more demand for park land it creates since lots can be smaller affording less private recreational space and more occupants per acre. The following formula will be used to determine the dedication requirement where a land dedication is required: Density Percentage of Land to be Dedicated (of the buildable land) 0-3.99 units per acre 10 percent 4.00-5.99 units per acre 11 percent 6.00-7.99 units per acre 13 percent 8.00-9.99 units per acre 15 percent 10.00 < units per acre 17 percent The land so dedicated shall be subject to approval by the city council in accordance with the city's Comprehensive Plan for parks. At the city council's discretion, a parkland dedication fee may be accepted or required instead of or connection with land dedication. The parkland dedication fee shall be set annually by the city council and adopted as part of the city's fee schedule. The parkland dedication fee shall be charged for each dwelling unit originated by the subdivision or development of any property in the city, not including any dwelling unit that may be in existence at the time of the adoption of the ordinance from which this article is derived, or which is subject to an approved development agreement with the city that includes a parkland dedication provision. (b) Appeal process. The parkland dedication fee may be appealed to the city council before the city council makes a decision on the final plat and shall be calculated as follows: The percentage of land to be dedicated will be multiplied by the fair market value of the net buildable acreage. The fair market value shall be determined by the city council, following their review of a current appraisal submitted to the city at the developer's expense. The appraisal shall be made by appraisers who are approved members of the SREA or MAI, or equivalent real estate appraisal societies. If the city receives written notice of a dispute over the parkland dedication fee before approval of the final plat, the developer shall pay the fee into an escrow account pending a decision of an appeal of the fee. If an appeal is not filed within 60 days following approval of the final plat, or if the person aggrieved by the fee does not prevail on the appeal, then the funds paid into escrow must be transferred to the city. (Prior Code, § 1215-040.1; Ord. No. 2010-449, § 1, 11-15-2010) 1 of 1 10/5/2012 2:23 PM 1 e � Bald Eagle Lake 1 159>n ♦ One Lake — —1 , 1 I ♦ 1 , 1 ♦I 6' o° 0 151St 3.0 � 2 , U 150th o, � � 1 1 1 1 1 1s Ith (F� 1 � 1 Round Lake Lake CITY QFF IU EST. 1906 Existing and Proposed Trails Map City Park DNR Wildlife Management Area (WMA) Undeveloped City Property Regional Trail - Existing Regional Trail - Proposed City Trail - Existing City Trail - Proposed Sidewalks Municipal Boundary Q 2040 MUSA Boundary Parcels Open Water Streams and Ditches Street 0 0.25 0.5 1 O Miles NORTH 3/4/2019 Map 6-7 th trF 17 Tth orses -T7 d k fi 0165h—, -L JE 159m o _ d Onek Lake 01 15MI 15 th e` e 155th h i 15, '1 77� Central Anoka County g ��o a� - ®® Regional Trail o 147th V,cbr � Egg lasth Rice Lake e ose Lake Y e 1� 0 1 th �3 Pak Lake Bn F 7th z ca dbe 136111 e h SC 0 �ay8o�\ever '� 'on L th Sch tion Lak - - ❑ 13 fi 1 , w 128 1 6th Sunset i w Gallivan Lake o a 125th Bald 24a, Eagle Lake 'd � 12�a 12 nd Round - -y 1s 9 tie er Head d� Lake _ CITY QF EST. 1906 Existing Trails and Sidewalks Map City Park DNR Wildlife Management Area (WMA� Undeveloped City Property Regional Trail City Trail Sidewalks Municipal Boundary M 2040 MUSA Boundary C Parcel Open Water — Streams and Ditches Street 0 0.25 0.5 1 O Miles NORTH 31412019 Map 2-2 Shayla Denaway From: Bryan Bear Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2020 3:15 PM To: Shayla Denaway Subject: FW: Andrew Olson Memorial From: Logan Jensen scout [mailto:loganboyscout151@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, March 16, 2020 7:25 PM To: Bryan Bear <BBear@ci.hugo.mn.us> Subject: Andrew Olson Memorial Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution. Hello my name is Logan Jensen and I am a part of troop 151 in Hugo. About a month ago my very close friend and fellow scout Andrew Olson passed away. His mom owns a day care and frequently goes to Oneka park by our houses. The troop and I would like to know if there is a way that we could install a bench and plant a tree at that park? The troop would also fundraise for the project. What would the steps be to get it approved? Thank You, Logan Jensen City of Hugo Park Memorial Policy Purpose: The City of Hugo supports the needs and principles of allowing memorials in parks and green space areas, but is also mindful that these facilities have many uses and are enjoyed by a wide range of people. Therefore, the City desires to manage and regulate memorials for the mutual benefit of all. It is the intention that the Park Memorial Policy only covers the broad sense of memorials and is not meant to be exhaustive. Memorial proposals outside the scope of this policy may still be considered. I. The City may accept donations to the park infrastructure system for memorials and acknowledge contributors A. Contributors guidelines 1. Donations will be accepted from family members, residents and civic groups. 2. All memorials are to be paid for by the applicant prior to installation. 3. Memorials will be positioned to maximize the benefit to an area. 4. The City accepts no liability for damage to any memorials from vandals, third parties or while carrying out maintenance activities. 5. The City reserves the right to remove any memorials that have been damaged or are, at the sole discretion of the City, beyond repair. 6. Applications for memorials to pets shall not be accepted. II. Acceptable donations to City Parks for memorials shall consist of: A. Tree with plaque* 1. Tree Species shall be chosen by Parks Commission to be consistent with overall landscaping plan of park. 2. Tree location shall be approved by the Parks Commission. B. Bench with plaque* 1. Bench shall maintain character of park or be consistent with standard City design. 2. Bench costs shall include cost of concrete pad for mounting. C. Miscellaneous Donations 1. Monetary or infrastructure donations may be recognized by placement of plaques on or near the facility or adjacent to park signs. 2. Other memorial donations will be considered on an individual basis. D. Temporary memorials are discouraged *Plaque guidelines: 1. Plaque shall be consistent with the City's standard design. 2. Plaque shall include simple wording. 3. Placement shall be reviewed by the Parks Commission and Public Works Department for consistency. 4. Plaque shall be set in concrete, flush with existing ground. 5. Plaque wording shall memorialize or denote a donation by persons or organizations and shall not contain obscenity or offensive wording. III. Contributions shall be reviewed and approved by the Parks Commission wow 1 •� r s s � r r r � ss' � � • •� � ,ram i An F tot MEMORIAL COMMUNITY FIRE PI ■ ¢,lt'` wm'Rif \ a LAWN EVENTS / STAGE 1 PAVILION 1 ) Park 12020 MPlan ) Hugo, Minnesota July 10, 2020 1 WSB Project number: 016030-000 tic i STORAGE BUILDING OPEN FIELD - r � s _ r - - ` a Aw OPTIONAL TRAIL CONNECTION TO CO RD 61 / HCRT 147TH ST N 1 FUTURE COMMUNITY SPORTS PAD ..r w.� say x:= � OPEN LAWN EWA r ; z D :! M < tell Y 1 L 9 P KING r S ALLS \� OPEN FIELD N 0 ✓+ I T 1 s RELOCATED SKATE PARK )CATION •"'' �� wr I il, I U F'F'EFK 14b I H 5 1. PARKING STALLS 6A PARS 0' 10' 20' 40' 80' Scale in Feet wsb 2 0 U 0. Z W CO W 0 0 00 m Z �i J 0 a a W Z Z 2 0 0 CO W W T W Z) Z W a a z W x 0 wsb Memorandum To: City of Hugo From: Candace Amberg, WSB Date: July 10, 2020 Re: Lions Park Master Plan WSB Project No. 016030-000 Lions Park Master Plan The 2020 Lions Park Master Plan reflects updates to the previous master plan according to current needs and desires for a potential phase one implementation project. The master plan was presented at the joint City of Hugo City Council and Parks Commission on June 291h for review and comment for modifications to finalize the Lions Park Feasibility Study with corresponding cost estimate. The 2020 Master Plan is summarized as follows: Vehicular Circulation: • The City Hall parking lot contains 6 ADA stalls along the front of the building with the remainder of the parking lot to contain approximately 58 parking stalls. The parking lot is configured so that Fitzgerald Ave acts as an entrance drive to the parking lot but the use of the center island does not allow straight through traffic into the parking lot in order to slow traffic. • Fitzgerald Ave north of the City Hall parking lot is shown widened to a 32' wide urban road with parallel parking along Lions Park containing approximately 9 stalls. The parallel parking stalls are optimal locations for setting up food trucks or other vendors to be used in conjunction with park lawn activities. These can also serve as a primary entrance into the park space for vehicles for select activities/events. • Upper 146th is shown with a total of approximately 48 to 50 pull -in parking stalls along Lions Park. • Finale Ave is shown as a 28' wide urban road with approximately 16 parallel parking stalls along Lions Park. • 147th St is shown as a 26' wide urban road with no parking on the roadway. • The City of Hugo intends to conduct additional street feasibility design studies to determine final road improvements, design and impacts along with overall stormwater strategy and design. • A parking lot (possibly a future phase) is shown in the northwest corner of the park with approximately 60-67 parking stalls. An area is identified for a rain garden, though a future stormwater design will be conducted with the road feasibility study. K:\016030-000\Admin\Docs\016030_2020-0710_Master Plan Summary.docx Page 2 Pedestrian Circulation: • A 10' wide trail is shown on the north side of 147th St with two trail options for pedestrian circulation to connect to the Hardwood Creek Regional Trail. o One option extends the trail on the north side of 147th St all the way to County Road 61 to align with the 147th St trail east of County Road 61. o An alternate option would divert pedestrians to cross over 147th St at the intersection of 147th and Finale at a crosswalk and then extend east through Lions Park along 147th, route south along Fitzgerald and connect to the HCRT by City Hall. While this trail option skirts the park perimeter, it has the potential for some conflict points with park and city hall users. • Pedestrian walks/trails extend along the entire perimeter of Lions park to provide access from parking areas to destination points within the park and creates a large loop. • An internal park trail loop extends around the open lawn area and provides access to the various destination points within the park. • Trails are shown to be 10' wide and bituminous. Some routes may be concrete in which case they may be constructed at an 8' width. • Entry plaza spaces are created along all four corners of the park to provide a visual cue and inviting appeal to the park. Lawn Space / Open Fields: • A long central open lawn space can accommodate large events, such as Good Neighbor Days, or it can accommodate several smaller events at once. • Open skating (if desired) can be located in close relation to one of the fire pit locations. • There are two locations shown for the inclusion of a backstop for informal ballfield use. At this time, the ballfield does not include an agg-lime infield. This can be further developed to include a T-ball infield or it can remain as simple as a backstop with turf lawn space. o The open field on the west end of the park is in close relation to the playground for optimal viewing for parents who may have kids utilizing the field and playground at the same time, but additional safety measures may be needed to protect the playground from foul balls. o The open field on the east end has more dedicated lawn space and is situated to cause fewer conflicts with other park uses, but lacks good visibility to the playground. • A smaller open lawn space is located on the east side of the main park pavilion and is meant to be open seating for the performance stage area. It can also be used for memorial gatherings in alignment with the future memorial, open picnic space related to the main pavilion, an open skating area (if desired), and can be secured with temporary fence for some park events. Recreational Amenities: • Skate Park: The skate park is shown being relocated along Fitzgerald Ave by the City Hall parking lot. • Memorial: A future memorial is shown in alignment with the main walkway to City Hall and can utilize the open lawn area for memorial events. • Main Pavilion: The pavilion is intended to be further design development with an architect to determine final programming and space requirements but for the purpose of the K:\016030-000Wdmin\Docs\016030_2020-0710_Master Plan Summary.dou Page 3 master plan is identified as a multi -purpose building with restrooms, storage space, open air picnic shelter space, a potential internal meeting / activity room, potential vending area or small kitchen, and has an exterior space to act as a performance stage that is aligned with the memorial and City Hall axis. There are external plaza spaces on either side of the building for outdoor seating and gathering. Additional storage is available with a shed along the NW parking lot. • Fire Pit: There are two locations shown for a community fire pit, and potentially both locations could be developed. o The larger community fire pit overlooks the main lawn space and has retaining walls that act as seating while creating wooded islands on either side. o The smaller fire pit is located on the east end of the pavilion and overlooks the smaller open lawn space. • Inclusive Playground: The playground has several pods to allow for a larger space dedicated to a destination playground that is inclusive for varying abilities, challenge levels and sensory stimulation. A central plaza space with seating and shade is located within the playground and ornamental fencing is placed along the exterior perimeter for safety enhancements. • Community Sports Pad: The sports pad is a possible future element, depending on budgetary constraints and recreational needs, and is a placeholder in the current plan. The space is large enough to develop a double tennis court which is also large enough to consider pickleball, basketball or other court combinations. • Splash Pad / Interactive Fountain: While the previous master plan indicated space for a splash pad, the current plan has eliminated this as an option due to high costs and current water use goals, but has considered the potential for a future interactive fountain in the seating plaza space on the west side of the main pavilion if needs dictate. K:\016030-000Wdmin\Docs\016030_2020-0710_Master Plan Summary.dou Lions Park Feasibility City of Hugo, Minnesota June 15, 2020 1 WSB# 016030-000 wsb ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COSTS - LIONS PHASE ONE No. Item Description Est. Qty. Unit Low Unit Price Low Total High Unit Price High Total General Park Construction 1 Earthwork 1 LS $200,000 $200,000 $300,000 $300,000 2 Removals: pavements 9,000 SY $3 $27,000 $5 $45,000 3 Removals: building demo (assumes no hazardous materials) 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 $40,000 $40,000 4 Removals: tree clearing & grubbing 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 $10,000 $10,000 5 Removals: playground, misc amenities 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 $40,000 $40,000 6 Erosion Control: silt/construction fence 2,500 LF $3 $7,500 $4 $10,000 7 Erosion Control: construction entrance/exit 2 EA $2,000 $4,000 $3,000 $6,000 SUBTOTAL: $293,500 $451,000 Utilities 8 Electrical Service (budget) 1 LS $25,000 $25,000 $50,000 $50,000 9 Park Trail Perimeter Lights (estimated at 100' o.c.) 25 EA $5,000 $125,000 $7,000 $175,000 10 Water Service (estimated budget) 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 $15,000 $15,000 11 Sanitary (estimated budget) 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 $20,000 $20,000 SUBTOTAL: $170,000 $260,000 City Hall Parking Lot & Plaza 12 Bituminous Pavement 3,000 SY $28 $84,000 $40 $120,000 13 Curb & Gutter 1,500 LF $20 $30,000 $25 $37,500 14 Striping 1 LS $2,500 $2,500 $3,500 $3,500 15 Stormwater Pipe (estimated) 700 LF $45 $31,500 $65 $45,500 16 Catch Basins (estimated) 7 EA $2,500 $17,500 $3,500 $24,500 17 Concrete Plaza & Walks 5,000 SF $10 $50,000 $20 $100,000 18 Lights (estimated) 10 EA $5,000 $50,000 $7,000 $70,000 19 Landscaping (budget) 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 $30,000 $30,000 20 Benches 4 EA $2,500 $10,000 $3,000 $12,000 SUBTOTAL: $295,500 $443,000 Multipurpose Building 21 Building (budget; 3500-4500 sf) 1 LS $1,500,000 $1,500,000 $2,500,000 $2,500,000 22 Concrete plaza 10,000 SF $10 $100,000 $20 $200,000 23 Stage Area / Risers 1,000 SF $25 $25,000 $35 $35,000 24 Fire Pit (small to large; wood to gas) 1 LS $30,000 $30,000 $75,000 $75,000 SUBTOTAL: $1,655,000 $2,810,000 Inclusive Playground 25 Inclusive Playground Equipment (budget) 1 LS $250,000 $250,000 $500,000 $500,000 26 Playground Surfacing 10,000 SF $25 $250,000 $35 $350,000 27 Playground Curb 1,000 LF $25 $25,000 $35 $35,000 28 Concrete Walks/Plaza 8,000 SF $10 $80,000 $20 $160,000 29 Benches / Tables 14 EA $2,500 $35,000 $3,000 $42,000 30 Trash & Recycling Receptacles 6 EA $1,500 $9,000 $2,000 $12,000 31 Shade / Umbrella Structures 10 EA $8,000 $80,000 $10,000 $100,000 32 Ornamental Fencing 515 LF $150 $77,250 $250 $128,750 SUBTOTAL: $806,250 $1,327,750 Misc. Park Improvements 33 Bituminous Trails: 10' wide 5,000 LF $28 $140,000 $40 $200,000 34 Concrete Corner Plaza's / Misc. Pads 2,500 SF $10 $25,000 $20 $50,000 35 Ballfield Backstop (no agg-lime) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 $25,000 $25,000 K:\016030-000\Quantity\Preliminary\016030_Feasibility Est_2020-0710 Page 1 of 3 36 1 New Skate Park Pad (equipment not included) 6,000 SF $15 $90,000 $25 $150,000 37 Skate Park Fencing (chainlink to ornamental) 316 LF $50 $15,800 $150 $47,400 38 Park Monument Signs 2 EA $25,000 $50,000 $50,000 $100,000 39 Trail Kiosk 1 EA $15,000 $15,000 $25,000 $25,000 40 Bike Rack 2 EA $1,500 $3,000 $2,000 $4,000 41 Drinking Fountain 2 EA $7,000 $14,000 $8,000 $16,000 42 Benches 10 EA $2,500 $25,000 $3,000 $30,000 43 Trash & Recycling Receptacles 4 EA $1,500 $6,000 $2,000 $8,000 44 Maintenance Shed (budget) 1 LS $25,000 $25,000 $50,000 $50,000 SUBTOTAL: $423,800 $705,400 Landscape Improvements 45 Restoration (seed w/hydromulch) 6 Acre $6,000 $36,000 $8,000 $48,000 46 Landscaping (budget: trees, shrubs, perennials) 1 LS $75,000 $75,000 $100,000 $100,000 47 Irrigation 1 LS $75,000 $75,000 $150,000 $150,000 SUBTOTAL: $186,000 $298,000 ESTIMATE SUBTOTAL: $3,830,050 $6,295,150 Recommended Contingency (15%) $574,508 $944,273 Estimated Professional Design, Engineering & Permit Fees (20%) $766,010 $1,259,030 ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL: $5,170,568 $8,498,453 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COSTS - LIONS FUTURE & ALTERNATE WORK No. Item Description Est. Qty. Unit Low Unit Price Low Total High Unit Price High Total A Sports Court & Lawn Games Al Court Pavement w/color coat (12"sand; 8" CL5; 3.5" bit) 1,600 SY $45 $72,000 $55 $88,000 A2 Fencing 480 LF $50 $24,000 $75 $36,000 A3 Nets 6 EA $2,500 $15,000 $3,500 $21,000 A4 Underdrainage 2,000 LF $20 $40,000 $30 $60,000 A5 Concrete Pavement 300 SF $10 $3,000 $20 $6,000 A6 Benches, Amenities 4 EA $2,500 $10,000 $3,000 $12,000 A7 Lawn Games (Bocce Ball / Horseshoes/Corn hole) 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 $30,000 $30,000 SUBTOTAL: $179,000 $253,000 B Fitzgerald Avenue Parking* 61 Earthwork 1 LS $10,000 $10,000 $15,000 $15,000 B2 Bituminous Pavement 225 SY $28 $6,300 $40 $9,000 B3 Curb & Gutter 230 LF $20 $4,600 $25 $5,750 B4 Striping & Signage 1 LS $1,000 $1,000 $1,500 $1,500 SUBTOTAL: $21,900 $31,250 C NW Parking Lot C1 Earthwork 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 $30,000 $30,000 C2 Bituminous Pavement 2,700 SY $28 $75,600 $40 $108,000 C3 Concrete Pavement 1,500 SF $10 $15,000 $20 $30,000 C4 Curb & Gutter 1,100 LF $20 $22,000 $25 $27,500 C5 Striping & Signage 1 LS $2,500 $2,500 $3,500 $3,500 C6 Pretreatment Basin (eng soil, plants, draintile, outlet) 7,000 SF $3 $21,000 $5 $35,000 C7 IStormwater Pipe (estimated) 750 LF $45 $33,750 $65 $48,750 C8 ICatch Basins (estimated) 7 EA $2,500 $17,500 $3,500 $24,500 C9 Lights 10 EA $5,000 $50,000 $7,000 $70,000 SUBTOTAL: $101,250 $377,250 D Finale Parallel Parking* D1 Earthwork 1 LS $15,000 $15,000 $20,000 $20,000 D2 Bituminous Pavement 500 SY $28 $14,000 $40 $20,000 D3 Curb & Gutter 420 LF $20 $8,400 $25 $10,500 D4 Striping & Signage 1 LS $1,500 $1,500 $2,000 $2,000 SUBTOTAL: 1 $38,9001 $52, 500 K:\016030-000\Quantity\Preliminary\016030_Feasibility Est_2020-0710 Page 2 of 3 E 146th Parking* E1 Earthwork 1 LS $20,000 $20,000 $30,000 $30,000 E2 Bituminous Pavement 1,100 SY $28 $30,800 $40 $44,000 E3 Curb & Gutter 550 1 LF $20 $11,000 $25 $13,750 E4 Striping & Signage 1 LS $2,000 $2,000 $3,000 $3,000 SUBTOTAL: $63,800 $90, 750 F Memorial Area F1 Concrete Pavement 4,000 SF $10 $40,000 $20 $80,000 F2 Flagpoles 5 EA $8,000 $40,000 $10,000 $50,000 F3 Memorials (budget) 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 $150,000 $150,000 F4 jBenches 3 1 EA 1 $2,5001 $7,5001 $3,0001 $9,000 F5 Landscaping (budget) 1 LS $5,000 $5,000 $10,000 $10,000 SUBTOTAL: 1 1 $142,5001 $299,000 ESTIMATE SUBTOTAL: $547,350 $1,103,750 Recommended Contingency (15%) $82,103 $165,563 Estimated Professional Design, Engineering & Permit Fees (20%) $109,470 $220,750 ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL: 1 $738,923 1 $1,490,063 *Stormwater work is assumed to be under the costs for street construction and is therefore not included in this estimate K:\016030-000\Quantity\Preliminary\016030_Feasibility Est_2020-0710 Page 3 of 3