Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutParks Packet 02.17.21Agenda Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission Meeting of February 17, 2021 Hugo City Hall, 7:00 pm This meeting will be held remotely pursuant to MN Statute Sec. 13D.021. Anyone who wishes to speak at the meeting is strongly encouraged to make arrangements by 4:30 pm on the meeting day by contacting Parks Planner Shayla Denaway at 651-762-6342. For more information on the remote meeting and participation, go to https://www.ci.hugo.mn.us/participate. Meeting ID: 865 4520 7501 7:00 pm 1. Approve Minutes from January 12, 2021 Meeting 7:02 pm 2. Oaths of Office • Emily McGinnity, Commissioner • Meredith St. Pierre, Alternate Commissioner 7:15 pm 3. Hugo Meadows Park Dedication 7:45 pm 4. Drengson Sketch Plan 8:00 pm 5. Lions Park Update 8:15 pm 6. 2020 Capital Improvement Planning 8:45 pm 7. Adjournment Page 1 of 3 Parks Commission Agenda February 17, 2021 Background Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission Meeting of February 17, 2021 Hugo City Hall, 7:00 pm Approve Minutes from January 20, 2021 Meeting Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the Parks Commission meeting of January 20, 2021. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED MINUTES. Oath of Office The Parks Commission has had an opening for an Alternate Commissioner. Former Commissioner Shawn Haag did not wish to be re -appointed in 2021. The Council received applications, held interviews, and made appointments at their February 1, 2021 meeting. Emily McGinnity has been appointed as a Commissioner and Meredith St. Pierre as an Alternate Commissioner. They will be asked to read the Oath of Office. MCGINNITY AND ST. PIERRE OATHS ARE ATTACHED. Hugo Meadows Park Dedication The Parks Commission reviewed a sketch plan called "the Meadows at Hugo" on March 20, 2019. The Planned Unit Development (PUD) application is for 87 residential lots on 27 acres located north of 159tn Street. The development includes paved trails and passive trails. The applicant is proposing to pay park dedication fees, which would total $208,800. Staff recommends discussion on the development and approval of the park dedication proposal. A MEMO ON HUGO MEADOWS IS ATTACHED. Drengson Sketch Plan A sketch plan application was received for 10 units on 3 properties totaling 15 acres from Drengson May Enterprises. The properties are in the Large Lot Single -Family Residential (R-1) zoning district and the applicant is proposing to comply with regulations for the zoning district. The applicant is proposing to pay park dedication fees for the 7 units created totaling $16,800. Staff recommends input be provided on the Drengson Sketch Plan. A MEMO ON THE DRENGSON SKETCH PLAN IS ATTACHED. Lions Park Update The Parks Commission reviewed a developed design for Lions Park at their January 20, 2021 meeting. The plans were recommended for approval and next steps were authorized. The City Council approved the plans and authorized construction documents at their February 1, 2021 meeting. Staff will provide updates on the next steps for Lions Park. THE COST ESTIMATES AS PRESENTED TO THE COUNCIL ARE ATTACHED AS WELL AS THE CONSULTANT PROPOSALS FOR CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS. Page 2 of 3 Parks Commission Agenda February 17, 2021 2021 Capital Improvement Plan A draft of the 2021-2025 Capital Improvement Plan has been put together with the assistance of Finance Director, Ron Otkin. The Parks Commission has been given the authority to make recommendations to the City Council on how to use the Special Park Fund and plans future expenditures with the Capital Improvement Plan. The CIP prioritizes improvements that the Parks Commission would like to make. Some projects may only be possible if additional funding becomes available through grants, private donations, or park dedication fees. In 2020, special park funds were used for projects over several Hugo parks. Arcand Park construction has totaled $478,000, with additional expenses anticipated in 2021. Miscellaneous park improvements totaled $11,000 including playground surfacing in four neighborhood parks and bench installations. $20,000 was spent on trail feasibility studies. SHIP funds totaling $15,000 were received that offset the benches and trail studies expenses. The special park fund ending balance thru December 31, 2020 is $1,344,415. Staff will provide a detailed re -cap of 2020 expenditures. Staff drafted a CIP for 2021-2025 based on the previous Capital Improvement Plan and upcoming projects. Staff recommends that the Parks Commission review the draft, make any necessary changes, and approve a Capital Improvement Plan. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED DRAFT CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR 2021-2025. THE PARKS PLAN CAN BE FOUND AT: https://www.ci.hugo.mn.us/2040compplan Page 3 of 3 Parks Commission Agenda February 17, 2021 Minutes Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission Meeting of January 20, 2021 Hugo City Hall, 7:00 pm Meeting held remotely pursuant to Minn. Stat. Sec. 13D.021 Present: Cathy Moore-Arcand (acting Chair), Roger Clarke, Mat Rauschendorfer, Nicole Schmid, Dave Strub (via phone only), Ranell Tennyson. (There is a vacancy on the Commission.) Staff Present: Scott Anderson Public Works Director Shayla Denaway, Parks Planner Debi Close, Secretary Moore-Arcand called the meeting to order at 7:04 pm. 1. Approval of Minutes from the December 16, 2020 Meeting Tennyson made a motion, Clarke seconded to approve the minutes of the December November 18, 2020 Parks Commission meeting. Ayes: Cathy Moore-Arcand, Roger Clarke, Nicole Schmid, Dave Strub, Ranell Tennyson Abstained: Mat Rauschendorfer Motion approved. 2. Lions Park Design Matt Lynse and Liz Gutzman with HCM Architects presented the developed design for the park site, playground and pavilion. Three committees helped determine proposed designs. The pavilion design package included a building with a large gathering space, server, meeting rooms, storage area, adjacent picnic shelter, and indoor and outdoor restrooms. The material types and color palettes were shown for the interior and exterior surfaces. Renderings where also presented. Schmid asked about the windows and their insulation as well as the roof's ability to handle snow. Lysne answered the questions. Rauschendorfer asked why the exterior color and contemporary prairie style were choose when they are not in the same schematic of the City Hall building. Lysne recapped the committee's discussions and process. Denaway shared that the committee wanted to take Hugo in a new direction and not design a building that would blend into the background. Page 1 of 3 Parks Commission Minutes January 20, 2021 The cost estimate for the pavilion was presented totaling $2.8 M. The park site plan included: on -street and off-street parking, an inclusive playground, court area, relocation of the skate park equipment, informal ballfield, connectivity to the Hardwood Creek Regional Trail, multiple seating areas, landscaping, and internal and perimeter trails and sidewalks. Clarke asked about the skate park and stated that he didn't want to lose that feature. Amberg discussed the area it was relocated to. Rauschendorfer asked about hiding the skate park because of activities that might happen at it and the berm. Amberg discussed that the berm will buffer the nearby homes. Schmid stated that it made no sense to buffer City Hall and the ones that want to see it. Denaway discussed that as the street improvement project has progressed, 147t" Street will have more traffic now that it will be a through street and provide continuous oversite of the skate park versus just people coming and going from City Hall. Rauschendorfer asked why a future water feature was shown on the north side of the building when the Council wasn't interested in one. Amberg shared that the Council discussed a plaza type water feature so we didn't want to take away the opportunity for the Council to decide that in the future. Rauschendorfer asked if a fountain would utilize as much water as a splash pad. Amberg informed that they can use very little if it is a recirculating system. Denaway informed that because the splash pad was such a big part of the master plan, it wasn't removed as a future consideration, but that the Council isn't interested in constructing it now due to their water conservation and budget goals. The option wasn't taken away to discuss it in the future. Amberg presented a detailed cost estimate totaling $4.24 M. Alternates including the sports courts and pedestrian lighting totaled $560,000. Rauschendorfer asked about the trail on the north side of the park and undergrounding power lines. Amberg updated that there is a meeting schedule to discuss utilities but decisions haven't been made yet. Moore-Arcand discussed the playground and that she was excited about the embankment which will visually pull kids in and elevate the playground design. Strub recapped that the designers followed through on everything suggested by the committee. With the pavilion, they brought in a few designs, and the committee went with a prairie style with modifications to warm it up. It will be a signature building and the rest of the park sounds good. Moore-Arcand Made a motion, Clarke seconded to approve the received plans and cost estimate for the Lions Park design to be reviewed by Hugo City Council. Ayes: Cathy Moore-Arcand, Roger Clarke, Mat Rauschendorfer, Nicole Schmid, Dave Strub, Ranell Tennyson Denaway updated on the next steps. Strub made a motion, Tennyson seconded to send construction document proposals to the Council and authorize drafting of construction documents. Ayes: Cathy Moore-Arcand, Roger Clarke, Mat Rauschendorfer, Nicole Schmid, Dave Strub, Ranell Tennyson Strub requested City staff update cost estimate information as it is received on the Lions Park Design. Page 2 of 3 Parks Commission Minutes January 20, 2021 Rauschendorfer asked about the playground equipment. Amberg shared that the Playground committee will have one more meeting on the equipment. Denaway shared that there will likely be a mix of vendors and that they will be coordinated with a bit more than a typical playground selection process. 3. Adjournment Tennyson made a motion, Rauschendorfer seconded to adjourn the meeting at 9:07 pm. All ayes. Motion approved. Page 3 of 3 Parks Commission Minutes January 20, 2021 OATH OF OFFICE PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) CITY OF HUGO ) ss. I, Emily McGinnity, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States of America and of the State of Minnesota, and faithfully discharge the duties of the office of Parks Commissioner of the City of Hugo in the County of Washington and State of Minnesota, to the best of my judgment and ability, so help me God. (Emily McGinnity) Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17th day of February, 2021. (Notary Signature) OATH OF OFFICE PARKS, RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE COMMISSION STATE OF MINNESOTA ) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) CITY OF HUGO ) ss. I, Meredith St. Pierre, do solemnly swear that I will support the Constitution of the United States of America and of the State of Minnesota, and faithfully discharge the duties of the office of Alternate Parks Commissioner of the City of Hugo in the County of Washington and State of Minnesota, to the best of my judgment and ability, so help me God. (Meredith St. Pierre) Subscribed and sworn to before me this 17th day of February, 2021. (Notary Signature) Agenda Number: CITY OF HUGO PARKS COMMISSION REPORT TO: City of Hugo Parks, Recreation and Open Space Commission FROM: Shayla Denaway, Parks Planner SUBJECT: Golden Valley Land Company —Preliminary plat and planned unit development for a residential development to be known as "The Meadows at Hugo." DATE: February 7, 2021 for the Parks Commission meeting of February 17, 2021 1. BACKGROUND: At the Parks Commission meeting of March 20, 2019, the Parks Commission reviewed a sketch plan application for "The Meadows at Hugo". The Commission provided guidance on the use of city -owned property to extend Farnham Avenue and the adjacent future park property. The Parks Commission discussed that payment of park dedication fees was preferable than land due. The Commission also provided input on the proposed trails. 2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat, planned unit development (PUD), and comprehensive plan amendment for a residential development. The PUD totals 32.93 acres and has 5.92 acres of wetlands for a net area of 27.01 acres. The preliminary plat proposes a total of 87 single family lots and six outlots. The property is guided Medium Density Residential and in keeping with that, the applicant is proposing a residential net density of 3.22 units per 1 acre. The property is currently zoned Future Urban Service (FUS) and is proposed to be rezoned to Planning Unit Development (PUD). The property is generally located north of 159th Street North and east of Highway 61. The plan shows 87 residential lots, wetlands and stormwater ponding areas, road and trail connections, and sidewalks and trails. The applicant is proposing the project to be built in two phases. The developer is not proposing a Homeowners Association or stormwater reuse for the development. -1- The Meadows at Hugo February 17, 2021 West of the property is a 38 acre (16 acres of upland) City owned park property that was dedicated with the Oneka Place development at the Parks Commission meeting of May 16, 2018. Per the request of the owner of the property on which the Meadows at Hugo is proposed, 4.5 acres was separated from the city park property to allow for a future street access. The applicant is proposing to construct an extension of Farnham Avenue North through the City -owned property. The City's north water tower is also located in this area. This will street also provide additional access to the future passive park. The applicant is asking for PUD flexibility for smaller lot sizes, decreased setbacks, and more. In exchange for that flexibility, among other items, the developer is proposing to: • Preserve and enhance natural features with the trail system that meanders through the development and connects to adjacent City park property. • Create a connection through the Greenway Corridor in the City with the establishment of a passive trail. 3. PARK DEDICATION: The applicant is required to dedicate land, pay a fee, or a combination of land and fee to satisfy park dedication per Sec. 90-324 of the City Code. The applicant is required to dedicate 10% of the developable acres for park land with a density of 3.99 units per acre. The applicant has indicated that there are 27 acres of buildable land in the development. Therefore, the applicant would be required to dedicate 2.7 acres of park land. However, the applicant is proposing to pay park dedication fees. During the sketch plan process, the Parks Commission indicated that this was preferable. The current park dedication fee is $2,400 per unit. With 87 units, the total park dedication fee collected would be $208,800. 4. CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Parks Frog Hollow, an active park in neighborhood park service area 4, is within walking distance and connected by trails. Trails and Greenways The applicant is proposing an eight foot trail throughout the development to connect between the existing trail on Farnham Avenue North and eventually north to 165ffi Street North, with future development. This is shown in the Trails Plan. The applicant has shown a trail along both road connections to the north, which allows more options for future connections to the north as well as provide a more consistent and linear corridor. The applicant is also proposing a trail connection to the west that will provide neighborhood access into the City -owned park land that is adjacent to the development. The applicant has stated that there will be an additional mowed, passive trail along the -2- The Meadows at Hugo February 17, 2021 ditch on the east side of the development. The passive trail will be consistent with making connections within the Greenway Corridor as indicated in the 2040 Comprehensive Place. Sidewalks are required to be built in developments with lots less than 80' wide (Sec. 90-336) and the developer has included them where trails are not being constructed. 5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the proposed park dedication fees with the Meadows at Hugo. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Applicant's Narrative dated January 26, 2021 3. The Meadows at Hugo Preliminary Plat received February 4, 2021 4. Overall Site Plan dated January 26, 2021 5. Park Dedication Policy 6. Trail and Sidewalk Plan 7. Neighborhood Park Service Areas Plan 8. Greenway Plan -3- The Meadows at Hugo February 17, 2021 �a a � L LL LLI�! 'S�th Stre Roads '7 The Meadows at Hugo Preliminary Plat/PUD Narrative 1/26/21 Over the past couple of months, we have coordinated with City staff and the DNR in designing "The Meadows at Hugo PUD" project. We are pleased to submit the Meadows at Hugo PUD Preliminary Plat for your consideration. Development Proposal Summary: The development site is 32.93 acres (gross) and has 5.92 of delineated wetlands, for a net area of 27.01 acres. The current site is used as agricultural land. The site is bordered on the west by City undeveloped park property, on the north by undeveloped agricultural land, on the east by County Ditch #3 and undeveloped agricultural land, and on the south by a single-family subdivision. The property is currently zoned Future Urban Service (FES), and is guided in the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plans as Medium Density Residential (MD). We are proposing a Planned Unit Development (PUD) for this project. Our Preliminary Plat shows a total of 87 single family villa lots for a net density of 3.22 units/acre. We are proposing two villa lot and building types. 45 lots will be 50' wide and are designed for 40' wide one-story villa homes. 42 lots will be 44' wide and are designed for 29' wide two-story villa homes. We are proposing 25' front setbacks, 30' rear setbacks, 5' interior side and 15' street side setbacks for the 50' wide one-story villa lots and 25' front setbacks, 30' rear setbacks, 7.5' interior side and 15' street side setbacks for the 44' wide two- story villa lots. We are requesting PUD flexibility to achieve these lot standards and dimensions as shown in the table below as compared to standard R-3 single family zoning. Please note, this project is guided medium density which would allow for (R-4) townhomes up to 6 units per acre, 25' front building setbacks and 70% impervious coverage. PUD Flexibilitv Requests Required (R3) Proposed 2-Story Villa 1-Story Villa Minimum lot size 10,400 sq. ft. 5,400 sq. ft. 6,750 sq. ft. Minimum lot width at front setback line 80 ft. 44 ft. 50 ft. Minimum lot depth 100 ft. 135 ft. 135 ft. Minimum front yard building setback 30 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. Minimum side yard building setback 10 ft. 7.5 ft. 5 ft. Minimum rear yard building setback 30 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. Maximum lot area covered by impervious surface 50% Up to 55% Up to 60% DNR Shoreland Overlay: After meeting and working with the DNR, we have designed the Shoreland Overlay District area (300' from County Ditch #3) to meet the DNR requirements for the Residential PUD requirements. We are proposing 25 single family Villa lots and maintaining 50% open space, see DNR residential PUD Analysis spreadsheet below. 18301- Hugo SF Residential Residential PUD Analysis - River with GD Shoreland Classification, Sewered Lots Density and allowable unit calculation: Fill In This Fill In This Fill In This Calculated Calculated Fill In This Field Field Field Field Field Field Allowable Minimum Lot Bonus Units per Tier Total Unsuitable Suitable Size for GD River Base Density with Bonus Proposed Tier Area Area Area (Sewered) Density Factor Density Units 75' wide (min) 1 415,327 0 415,327 (1377If.} 15.4 1.5 27.5 26.0 Total 1 415,327 1 ❑ 1 415,327 0% 1 1❑❑% * * * Note: Per 6.26 of code min. lot width of 5F lot(5) i5 75'. There are no minimum lot sf requirements for rivers and streams These lots will meet all DNR PUD Shoreland Overlay District standards for single family Villa lots. Our proposed PUD maintains, restores and creates a significant amount of wetland area, natural environmental features, and public open space. We designed an internal trail system that will connect to the future trails in the City park property to the west. Our PUD will connect to Farham Ave. N. to the southwest with a public road through the City park property. Per our discussions during Sketch Plan approval, we will pay for the site grading and road improvements on the City park land, and for the City to pay for the utility improvements on the park property. The Preliminary Plat also shows two future street connections to the north, that will ultimately connect to 165t" St. N. We are not showing a street connection to the east as this property is zoned Business Park (BP) and guided as Industrial (IND). Comprehensive Plan Amendment: As shown on our Preliminary Utility Plan, we are proposing to connect to the Metropolitan Council's interceptor sewer at our northwest property corner. We would then extend the City's 36" trunk sanitary sewer line to our northeast property corner. This would require an update to the City's 2040 Comprehensive Plan. This project proposes to amend the comprehensive plan to gain access to trunk utilities (Sanitary Sewer and Water) for this project as well as the future extension of trunk utilities to this area of the City. The current comprehensive plan shows connections to trunk sanitary sewer at 165t" Street (one parcel north of our proposed connection point. Through conversations with City staff, it was determined that our proposed trunk sanitary sewer connection point would serve as well as the original proposed location on 1651h street for the surrounding properties and would enable this property to develop. Trunk water is also served at our southwestern property corner near the water tower and will extend trunk water to our north property line. This is a better location for trunk water connection in order to develop with the comprehensive plan. Otherwise, the water would need to "leap frog" two parcels to reach 165th. The trunk sanitary sewer and watermain will be constructed as part of this development and extended to the project boundaries. This proposed trunk utility connection plan and modification to the comprehensive plan is logical, prudent and efficient to begin the extension of City trunk utilities to this area of the City. PUD 6enefitsc Our development plan will provide several benefits over the standard medium density (townhome) zoning: 1. An efficient use of land for single family residential construction that enables greater community engagement and interaction. 2. Design is an environmentally sensitive proposal with less density than would be allowed under medium density guidelines and attached townhomes. 3. Providing landscaping that exceeds the City minimum requirements. 4. Incorporating architectural design guidelines for homes in the development. 5. Villa product types that are appealing to different home buyers and enhancing visual interest of the proposed neighborhoods. 6. Open space that promotes outdoor engagement and visual connectivity between residential units and their surroundings. 7. Construction of a Public Street to provide access to the City park land at developer's expense. 8. Construction of a trunk sanitary sewer connection to begin the expansion of development potential in the area of the city with cost sharing with the City. 9. The extension of the City's trail system thru the subdivision at developer's expense. These design details all demonstrate our commitment to providing a high -quality development worthy of receiving the PUD designation. The creation of non-standard setbacks and lot sizes for the villa lots requires the PUD zoning designation, which is the primary reason for our PUD request. The proposed PUD subdivision creates a variety of lot types allowing for a diverse type of housing. Thus, the proposed subdivision facilitates the mixed -use development goals sought after in the PUD Planned Unit Development zoning standards. In addition, the proposed PUD will preserve to the maximum extent possible the site's natural environmental features, and provide for trail connections to the City park. In addition to the PUD benefits described above we also considered stormwater reuse for irrigation for the site. Stormwater Reuse for the purposes of irrigation is somewhat common in the City of Hugo and for good reason. Conservation and sustainability. We have considered the possibility of stormwater re- use for this project and have decided it is not feasible for this site for the following reasons. 1. The site has an extensive wetland system that needs all the stormwater runoff to be sustained. The existing wetlands on the site constitute approximately 18% of the site area. Due to the creation of new wetlands as part of the project development, at completion of the project the area of wetlands will be approximately 21% of the site area. We are increasing wetland area which drives a demand for stormwater. Stormwater sustains the wetlands. 2. The stormwater ponding for this site is directly connected to the wetland basins. All stormwater runoff is needed so the wetland (existing and newly created) will not dry out. 3. If the stormwater basins are used for irrigation this water will be diverted away from the wetlands and cause a wetland loss. 4. The change in runoff volume (from row crops to single family homes) is not enough of an increase to offset the loss of runoff volume to a water re -use irrigation system. 5. The amount of runoff volume needed to sustain an irrigation system will not allow enough runoff in both volume and frequency to leave the ponds and feed the wetlands. 6. Additional water reuse calculations and reasoning is contained in the project stormwater management report. Phasing plan and proposed development schedule: The current" phase line" is shown on the preliminary plans. The project (home sites, streets and utilities) will be developed in two phases (west and east). The entire project will be graded in one phase however which is needed to implement the complex wetland mitigation and stormwater management plan as well as earthwork balance. The west side of the development will be phase 1 and will be constructed in 2021. The east side of the development will be Phase 2 and will be constructed in 2023. Housing Types: Golden Valley Land Co. is partnering with Centra Homes as the exclusive builder for this project. As discussed above, we are proposing two housing types that will fit on the proposed lots: 40' wide single level homes (on 50' wide lots) and 29' wide two story homes (on 44' wide lots). Both housing types will be slab on grade. We provided sample elevations of these homes in this narrative. 40' Wide Single Level Homes: These architecturally designed homes will range in size from 1,382 square feet up to 1,903 square feet with a variety of elevations. The interiors will have 1-3 bedrooms and 2.5 bathrooms and 2 car garages. We will work with the new homeowner to select exterior and interior options to create a home for them. Sample elevations and floor plans are provided in Exhibit A We have found that these homes appeal primarily to the empty nest buyers but also many other buyer types (single professionals, move down buyer, etc.) like having a single level home. The homes have been designed with special attention to the elevations to enhance the streetscape. The living space of the home has been focused on the rear of the house to allow home buyers to enjoy the open space that the majority of the lots will enjoy. The 40' wide single level homes will be built on lots with a 5' side yard - thus 10' between homes. In discussion with City Staff a few questions were asked about the spacing of 10' between homes. We know of many neighborhoods in the Twin Cities area that are building homes with 10' between homes. To help Staff, Commission and Council better visualize this spacing, we have provided some pictures (See Exhibit B) of the 10' spacing. In addition, Centra Homes is building in a few subdivisions that have this guideline and we can provide a list of neighborhoods if anyone would like to drive through some of these neighborhoods. 29' Wide Two Story Homes: These homes will range in size from 1,777 square feet up to 2,337 square feet. These homes all have three bedrooms and two and a half bathrooms. The larger floor plan has an optional fourth bedroom that homeowners can select. Each home will also have a two car attached garage. These homes are designed with young growing families in mind but we have found a variety of buyers such as single parents, professionals and move down buyers. While working with architects we have tried to minimize the garages by having living space over the garage and front stoops. We have provided sample elevations and floor plans in Exhibit C. Exhibit A: 40' Wide Single Level Homes Sample Elevations and Floor Plans (on following pages) 1— 2 Beds • 1.5 — 2 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,382 fsf Elevation A - Farmhouse Elevation B - Colonial Single -Level Home FEATURES: Island Kitchen and Pantry Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet Flex Room AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE: Extended Patio Covered Patio Cabinet and Sink in Laundry Room Gas Fireplace with Built-in Cabinets Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom Barn Door at Primary Bath Deluxe Primary Bath French Doors at Flex Room Second Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room Stone Accents Across Front of Home Elevation C - Cottage Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options! CENTRAHOMES LLC CentraHomes.com Single -Level Home 1— 2 Beds • 1.5 — 2 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,382 fsf Farmhouse floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation. Optional Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room Bedroom 2 11' 1" x 11' 3 CENTRA HOMES LLC Optional Primary Bath Shower with Tile Surround CentraHomes.com A Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping r and elevation renderings are artist's concells, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. Effective 11/30/20. Equal Housing Opportunity. 2 — 3 Beds • 2 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,611 fsf Elevation A - Farmhouse Elevation B - Colonial Single -Level Home FEATURES: Island Kitchen and Pantry Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet Flex Room AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE: Extended Patio Covered Patio Mud Room Drop Zone Mud Room Bench with Cubbies Cabinet and Sink in Laundry Room Gas Fireplace with Built-in Cabinets Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom Barn Door at Primary Bath Deluxe Primary Bath French Doors at Flex Room Third Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room Stone Accents Across Front of Home Elevation C - Cottage Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options! CENTRAHOMES LLC CentraHomes.com Single -Level Home 2 — 3 Beds • 2 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,611 fsf Farmhouse floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation. i i i I I I Optional 1 Utend:d Patio Optional Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room Bedroom 3 10'4" x 117' CENTRA HOMES LLC Optional Primary Bath Shower with Tile Surround Optional Deluxe Primary Bath CentraHomes.com A Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping r and elevation renderings are artist's concells, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. Effective 11/30/20. Equal Housing Opportunity. 2 — 3 Beds • 2.5 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,903 fsf Elevation A - Farmhouse Elevation B - Colonial Single -Level Home FEATURES: Island Kitchen and Walk -In Pantry Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet Flex Room AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE: Extended Patio Covered Patio Mud Room Drop Zone Mud Room Bench with Cubbies Cabinet and Sink in Laundry Room Gas Fireplace with Built-in Cabinets Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom Barn Door at Primary Bath Deluxe Primary Bath French Doors at Flex Room Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room Stone Accents Across Front of Home Elevation C - Cottage Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options! CENTRAHOMES LLC CentraHomes.com Exhibit B Sample Pictures of Single Level Homes with 10' between Homes MMMMMMM Exhibit C 29' Wide Two Story Homes Sample Elevations and Floor Plans (on following pages) Single -Level Home 2 — 3 Beds • 2.5 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,903 fsf Farmhouse floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation. Opt. Deluxe Opt. Primary Bath Primary Bath Shower with Tile 0 m CENTRA HOMES LLC Opt. Bedroom in Lieu of Flex Room IBedroom 2 4�J1, Bedroom 3 oo. CentraHomes.com A Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping r and elevation renderings are artist's concells, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. 12/1/20. Equal Housing Opportunity. 3 Beds • 2.5 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,777 fsf Elevation A - Farmhouse Elevation B - Craftsman Two -Story Home FEATURES: Covered Porch with Entry Closet Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet Convenient Upper -Level Laundry AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE: Extended Patio/Covered Patio Gas Fireplace Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom Barn Door at Primary Bath Primary Bath Shower with Tile Surround Laundry Cabinet and Sink Stone Accents Across Front of Home Elevation C - Prairie Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options! CENTRAHOMES LLC CentraHomes.com Two -Story Home 3 Beds • 2.5 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 1,777 fsf Prairie floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation. r------------ I Opt Extended Patio I I Opt. Built -In Cabinets Opt. Fireplace I I I Great Room I I 14'11" x 15' I I Patio 6'xT ---- `� Dining Area 10'6" x 13' Kitchen i i Mud 137' x 13' 11 Room Optional Primary Bath Shower with Tile Surround CENTRA HOMES LLC Entry II Covered I I II Porch I I I, Main Level Garage 21'8" x 20'8" Mech. 'Laundry Upper Level r il�r--. _— I Opt. Sink Opt. Barn Door I II III R_________________________ _i I I III Optional Tray Vault L I I I I Primary Suite I I 16'8" x 13' I I ------------------------- I I I I ------------------� Open to Below Bedroom 2 12'4" x 10T' Bedroom 3 12'4" x 10T' CentraHomes.com A Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping r and elevation renderings are artist's concepts, me not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. Effective 8/11/20. Equal Housing Opportunity. 3 Beds • 2.5 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 2,063 fsf Elevation A - Farmhouse Elevation B - Craftsman Two -Story Home FEATURES: Island Kitchen and Pantry Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet Loft AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE: Extended Patio/Covered Patio Mud Room Bench & Cubbies Mud Room Drop Zone Gas Fireplace Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom Barn Door at Primary Bath Deluxe Primary Bath Laundry Cabinet and Sink Stone Accents Across Front of Home Elevation C - Prairie Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options! CENTRAHOMES LLC CentraHomes.com Two -Story Home 3 Beds • 2.5 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 2,063 fsf Farmhouse floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation. I Opt. E#ended Patio Main Level Patio 3'x6' Great Room 12'6" x 16' Opt. Fireplace Upper Level Optional Primary Bath Shower with Tile Surround CENTRA HOMES LLC Optional Tray Vault Dining Area 12' x 12' Pantry Kitchen Mud 12'x16' pp� 11 Room' Loft 12' x 11' Entry Mechanical Garage 22'8" x 19'2" Covered Porch Open to Below 0 Primary Suite'I L--- jo 13'6" x 16' 1 Bedroom 211'"x 12'2" Bedroom 3 11'3" x 107' i "------------ T�-n ,opt. earn Door n � _ i CentraHomes.com A Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping r and elevation renderings are artist's concells, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. Effective 7/31/20. Equal Housing Opportunity. 3 — 4 Beds • 2.5 Baths • 2 Garage Bays • 2,329 — 2,337 fsf Elevation A - Farmhouse Elevation B - Craftsman Two -Story Home FEATURES: Island Kitchen and Large Walk -In Pantry Primary Suite with Large Walk-in Closet Loft AVAILABLE OPTIONS INCLUDE: Extended Patio/Covered Patio Mud Room Bench & Cubbies Mud Room Drop Zone Gas Fireplace with Built-in Cabinets Tray Vault in Primary Bedroom Deluxe Primary Bath / Barn Door Laundry Cabinet and Sink Fourth Bedroom in Lieu of Kid's Loft Stone Accents Across Front of Home Elevation C - Prairie Ask our Expert Guide to see more exterior color options! CENTRAHOMES LLC CentraHomes.com Two -Story Home 3 —4 Beds • 2.5 Baths 9 2 Garage Bays • 2,329 — 2,337 fsf Farmhouse floor plan shown; covered porch, window placement and fsf may vary per elevation. Main Level :'�----_�' ------ Opt Opt. Opt. Fireplace T I I E#ended Patio Banc -In Covered I I Cabinets I I Porch I I Entry II I I Great Room I I I 15'6" x 15' Opt. Bench w/ Pantry Mud r---- 6' Patio Room 2"x3' II Optional Bedroom 4 11'1" x 11'1" Optional Bedroom 4 with Walk -In Closet Dining Area10'6"x13' E�Lj I I Kitchen 14'3" x 11' I I Bedroom 2 11' x 11'10" Bedroom 3 10'9" x 111" Garage 22'8" x 197' Study 10'11" x 11' / Open to Below Imo? Lj I Op[. Sink I -- IMechanical Kids' Loft111 x 11'1" Optional Primary Bath Shower with Tile Surround CENTRA HOMES LLC L Upper Level Barn Door ---------------------- ---------------- Primary Suite; 15'8" x 13'8" } { Optional Tray Vault--------------------- CentraHomes.com A Seller reserves the right to make changes or modifications to plans, maps, specifications, materials, features and colors without notice. Prices are subject to changes without notice. Maps, plans and landscaping r and elevation renderings are artist's cor lfs, are not to scale and may not accurately depict the homes or home sites as they are built. These illustrations may depict options and features that are not standard on all homes. Optional features may be included at additional cost and are subject to construction schedule deadlines. All references to square footage are approximate and may vary with elevations. Dimensions and square footage calculations are made using architectural measurements. Home site fencing and walls may not be included in the purchase, and if included, will vary according the size and location of the home site. Exterior treatments, window locations and room configurations may vary with elevation. Model interior decorating, landscaping, fencing and other amenities are for display purposes only. Please ask Sales Counselor for complete details. Copyright 2020. Centra Homes, LLC. MN Builder License #BC638832. Effective 7/31/20. Equal Housing Opportunity. PRELIMINARY PLAT GENERAL NOTES PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: The Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 8, Township 31 North, Range 21 West, according to the United States Government Survey thereof, Washington County, Minnesota. DATE OF PREPARATION: 12-04-2020 APPLICANT: Golden Valley Land Company Peter Knaeble 612-309-9215 6001 Glenwood Ave, Golden Valley, MN 55422 BENCHMARKS: Elevations are based on the NGVD 29 Datum. Site Benchmark is the top nut hydrant located on the north side of 159th St N, having an elevation of 926.69 feet. As shown hereon. EXISTING ZONING: FUS (Future Urban Service) PROPOSED ZONING: PUD (MDR) AREAS: The Gross land area is 1,745,448 +/- square feet or 40.07 +/- acres. NOTE: For Proposed Lot Areas, See Site Plan FLOOD ZONE: This property is contained in Zone X (area determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain) per Flood Insurance Rate Map, Community Panel No. 27163C0136E, effective date of February 3, 2010. Rory L. Synstelien Minnesota License No. 44565 rory@civilsitegroup.com Linetype & Symbol Legend 1=0 FIBER OPTIC SIGN ❑A AIR CONDITIONER O UTILITY MANHOLE GAS GASMAIN ® BOLLARD ( SANITARY MANHOLE WATERMAIN QE ELECTRIC MANHOLE > SANITARY SEWER sT STORM MANHOLE >> STORM SEWER ® CATCH BASIN o FLAG POLE GHu OVERHEAD UTILITIES Q FLARED END SECTION [F] ROOF DRAIN TEL TELEPHONE LINE ( GAS VALVE FT TELEPHONE BOX ELE ELECTRIC LINE QT TELEPHONE MANHOLE HANDICAP SYMBOL cTv CABLE LINE x CHAINLINK FENCELINE eT ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER �' HYDRANT 11 WOODEN FENCELINE ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL Ow WATER MANHOLE o o- GUARDRAIL © CABLE TV BOX g WATER VALVE ° ° a CONCRETE SURFACE OE ELECTRICAL METER -0- POWER POLE I © GAS METER GUY WIRE PAVER SURFACE • FOUND IRON MONUMENT _A CONIFEROUS TREE BITUMINOUS SURFACE O SET IRON MONUMENT 0SURFACE DECIDUOUS TREE (0CAST IRON MONUMENT GRAVEL/LANDSCAPE PRELIMINARY PLAT: THE MEADOWS AT HUGO N89029'46"E 1319.69 109.30 to 144.51 \ / In 192.22 30.00 30.00 to 75.81 to 72.14 to 92.52 L049.36 30.03 30.03 L=4°51'25" 397.86 � �/ I 5.91 N N \� 73.12 -- = N N rn N N �N - - N 25.01 - \ �a I ,y I - - - - - - ----- 7 M vo I\I 00 ; I 30 30 N89°29'46"E140.10 �7 Xa� 5 I �I� 1 I� I - oI I I1 2 I IM 4 / /`' `° I I - ° \ co o iO v o -9 48'27" I v < I I I 2\ WET o o � o I 1 I h I I~ / //`v C) " Soso 2 5 >t A=2 02'15' ti v rn o� / ��\ \ / o/ 0 - I z W 3 °col oO L-------� I� 5 0 \ ry 90.54 - �L - - -4.62 = -� --- -- { Q I �� I IM d� M/ir; - - - - - - _ - N 50.23 XIS 0 \\ 01 Cry / 11 ° 'lp o L N89°29'46' E 210.78 30 3 8 o r�i a N oLO / ,�Q �1 90 I IF o ^I I� to // M/// � 89 29'46"W 142.25 20 p81 /' / \ 9 `�v�- ^ I to - I IO o� ni / co / �� 5 Y 1 '$0„ 24 I o et ro O 3" ° o o rn / C N I \ Xa°` ( ,250 23 ` �� �� A`�c� 59., I Iz dA I h /! / /� �O / / L - 5� - - - - �' l� 63 i / ^t / X a rn !n 5 4,/.��\g / 4\.ls �8 �-� L �t / Q /� S89°29'46"W 147.64 o �r / o j sr 5 8 G t� �Z n a N �o\ ut N l) rQ 9\ Q o �p 0° ^ M X� ti \ p r+ I ~ ti6 / L� o j S89 29'46"W I �/ �O \ >L Y ��'' 2 3 / ry '- / / % / 09 0 '"' I ; O\ \\ ° N / 0L 00 S�, 33 4� �� I •05 6 �� S' 4 0 co ° 91 / / /� XoS. X<>,�,. M 9.,\\ ,90 M M WE 6/ / / o L5 , O - I' �d,ZS / 4 3 �h �\ _�-'- - - / // M / / // 0 I Oi 9, \, / _ o �/ o �\ 1 7s \ \ II s I 0 / /ti O I I jKcl 4i' nj o S89 29'46"W 157.53 a e - I GG \ o2 L) 6 O �6'0 O 6�/ cb 7 p /` ,o. / I o OJT \\ t6 vt 4 \ I 5 / p/ L of I o0 `�. N /�i \ 'C 5 k 1/ I 0 O W O / C a\.>9\\ \�T_ a \ I I O \6�02 rL \. 0� o 1g11 h� b 4 290 M \ ZO„ h p= 2 2 0 IN 1'X -914- 41, vl zg V / \ / /'y4''ti• `y i /� �� S�1 v 9�8 \�' /' ,� 1�� 1.75 - - ��� / 5� \ gig '. IN7g o Z. O 32'� 4 -- 0. 42 I h // tx p' / d / \�` 2 r I i 3� - - - - - - // L 0,6 65 `08'41 „ 9 c - T - �6>0 11 \ /S \ o y1 / / (O Y � I 11 a of � - / _ _ M I X W R` 4g4 �' , • 50 / ti/ / rMj N M I M I I^ \ /ice/ ° \ _ 7 g" a O co - = /'� 1 S89 29'46"W 165.90 d_ �\ p0 P / / o N `° `� o o M ;p N o --J $� +ti Ch ofo n MO �%' ti ♦ Zoo i �, ♦ I I d� 35°45411 / 0053 2� l 'I " o0 lri o' /b / S 264 2 1 I \ _ Jr 4O4 37.45 r N66 0 00 oo ° cP,, b / p w I II I I M N n I ~' CO S 46 2° t \� ' 03,' I I I X e / J ab e o 20 I Z' v 6 t� to a--------�'' 2j O e e X Xg, Xo, �.� 26" \ i' �� 0' ° / / I '� II - / O \ 2 I ,5 / X g 1 \° Al,6y \ I I I a M 's s 46 °� f� •° ' ✓dco�F�P O �/ / p1 V ° V Ln 'O n/ \ S89°29'46"W 158.12 co` ''20 00 °�. 1 s° ^� �` 3 ° I 4 �I I 5 �� M�oM �\ sO,,9 $>o\I O I N89°09'07"W 146.57v tOQr°� \\ '�'%odso O I I I I NIA o ' N p �/i=17°36'07" 20 / �_ °8"� \ 6 11.91 M /� o� y3 J o a N n 67.59 / I +. L --A=20°03'49 IN 1= \ POFaraEe 6 I pI I I a to / / 1 o 4,9o \ _ _ _ w i I� O o g F to z 5.63 --I-' /_ / 111.44 �g6 7/ 0 0 0 9og _ _ - N89 09'07"W 148.63 I r1 1' O O \ 790 68.62 76.27 \ �:�- iA6"\1`1 I o cn 6.•r �1" ry /� J \ I / / M o S , _ o I 7 Ip o I N Ofo� �� 51'47"E - - - / °2g 0=2Io38'48„!' f /r� <� �w l Ed aof Water - 92.47 01 N90°00'00"E �0 57 _ I I I N89°09'07"W 148_6 J� o I � `^ p �/ M 0 144.89 0 30 30 0� i (� 56.67 / I _ --Edge _ - o o ET 12_114 Ln 4I 6 14 01 1 7 / i Z //1� d'r p �� �� / / 2 59 I_ --Edge of Wetland a elineated g5= I O - 18.62 v 30 I 30 /J 0.,5 M �I / / / 40� 1 / �A II� ` �� _ by Jacobson Envi�mental o I o I 0=8°06'18'_ �- j o I/ / �6"W 11 0� In \ / g5 X,.:.1 II 92e2 2ge X� I I I -25.46 -�\ t 1W 110350� i o N90 00'00"E 144.89 7m 574o2g yoh�h IN k 92 XI rn I� I p„ W o O UTLOT 12X112 �I I� �� i p J �13 I111 z IIp I N89�09'O�W 15�. 1�1 0o t>, 0 1 �O o �I I� �I 18 /Di / \ \ o I I I °90 a� / a2� /a 6 , 1 W WET 12- # 55 14°33'56"/ 0 N a�. •� El �� ° W So 0`26n / / / / �� o 'a I Xo°. o X X X \ 7 N= yU` ,5 I o I 3 1 I Ln� o \ X w 4536 - �Sv o� rn _ / o =s15._ Quo Ip � � 70.00 / A6 140 l0�ln o T--- WET E _x �O I �7�029 I� \ X1�k6� I I I oo I N89 0907"W 52/ / / e1.474- --- 722 1 6 I 100.00 17 I ��jjg° o 1I1I 1 o g ,- ? o �2 -------- rn J xl 91 I 62.54 3 ��, I9`oT�� y _1O - -p% �Oa 2�/ / ie \\ D�jOp 0 - N90°00'00"E �I / IIz ' I� 4� I\ g," i WET 12 E O� v/�' Ln� / / / /w 140'10UV�o B 1 III I I I �"X �4°, 9"0 X Xo / XXo I I I I S89 09'07"E L� / s /� I I 6 / _I- I III X ` ° ' °/ vv _� 70-00 �4°2g46 LNn Xo, za 140.25 J B „° ti �� S o x I 5 �915� _ 3o D�` 5 QO \ �9 1 1 L p O '3p `G 5 05 �61 O y Jacobson Envir / X \ III X 9\ z �,� o` �~r� �' 2 IM o I II I \ c�3� \ quo �� DC0 30 I 30 r.l /0� �� g, a5 III M O h inl w 1g0.1 p 6i I III I I �o 506 55�1 3 / .9 'y I/ � ,6 a'� a 4 t ti�O ,�\ Dti �I I I /A°2g 46 % \ IIII \ Xo 2 X A oGJ� 00 \ l/ o ° 57 i \ \ X 9 6. N90 00'00"E 140 00 � 15 I ,ago\ ao2�18� a C5 xvL/ 02 2 oGg \ X ' 01 � - \N g2° �2 % X e24� g2 a48 / E. / rn'v / X �� /j c�V X I 2� \ E, / x °�o / o \ �'1 I X °0 X X x 92 FO I X g220$ �2� 1 X O,�O /X 020'�° I 90r 00 53 N (tl �' g`LO-�6 k9 I 21 x �\ X°2 Xo I ET ETW�ET k J XX��a +//�� WET / I ?-'v ET\ I 0`d I 5 X9 X� 8. k WFT Wire Fence Xa6 \ IX�z x9 x�X o4a g2°5° X10 g o Via/ xgll WET x \ 65 X/ / I \ \ X o I x N9 X °2° 92 2, ( / X g2 ° W x -918- � g / WET 3.43 �\ X _� 923- / % e9 px rt =0°47' �,922- - E� Xaz°�o �X WqT g x WET %-250 .b T � �� I x�z�5 2 SC r F - _ N ,� F \ x N �C9I�Rim 919.16 / } I. o� w , INV= �\ 91 / O , SMH S (0 Rim=9 . 5 S Rim- Inv=916.0 92� \ --97 I x 9 O 6 ✓ \92` $92 x x X �", 2 X \ \ \ 5 \ �.q 8 --921--_922- �/ �3 g2 0� T � g1� I / I r 01 / / / X,6°� X °� I X/•�c9 2 O \ �,5�% M of - - - - - - �p Ln N / /9° 22 O TLOT F / ° / /' \ 1� 5� 7 0 10 O [V 'n / / / / 10 O X o�h I I J 61 ° 5 1 05 I I I/ / 11 140' 2 ��/ /\ s CD O �' v' / NI 't I / 1 W IN \ O 0 0 / S 7°�/ / m '00 Q�/' �titi ��N90°00'00"E 140.00 J`r ^ 14029 46 Ln ^ \ '^ I k, N I �/ / Amon - A� �s 14 I I o 9� P. %3i / �so '00 /A NN. \� wI -- ---� 4\ Iw o /� rn '? Ln > �2 0p^ tSt�t \v' 0 �I I� \ o / / / / i0 to w X o ' M I J /gD �0p I p,ky \ 9� oI v N90°00'00"E 140.00 I o � �6„w 1A0' I0 o x10) / to o I O p 00 ti� /66 / �Oo3 �k�^ �9\\ c9�\\ a L------J z 5,7go29 13 ILn p o I �9e of Delineated c 6`9 �Ik lJ` /' �• \ Ct \ \ 7 �� V)I ppl / Q / I I / X / XLr) 9� as Delineated p by Jacobson �' / O 2 \ ..0, \ \ 12 CD O / / p O I I I CD Environmental S Q/' 7� \\ /' I 4I I I / -1 O U T LOT B z I O I I -915-\ \ \ \ y \ \ ��o\ \ N90°00'00"E 140.00 I LNn / / 10 o cn / z �v' OOi\ 2c� \ 6 \\ Igo--------0 4611w 140 IN �� \ 5 ��\ tQ \ v\� �------gyp S�42g1 �915�/ II I I 29 6 ° _ \ I/ O % / / I �� vmoo �� �� v v � 13 p 12 / J 9 �62 / II I� I xX X, �z� ^) y h t) \ Q 6\ R I� I� oo / X I I I o X°9r /\ O• M�/O\�4 /j.--ll LN90°00'00"E 140.00 Jv I N NI 3 / / / / � / I I � �- r�^ \\ ° tJ•/ Edge of Wetland as N �� tiv /n \ \ \ \ �\ \ d� \ ka/ /00 $/ � - - - - - - 0 / '46" 1 IN g,° 20 / I I J A\2/ by Jacobson Delineated I �/ \w) \� �O\ \� /Q 1 o� I �4029 Ln X/ I I ' I 0 / Environmental N89°09'&7" W-142.29 1�v �9o\'ro 1 \� \ �o "'o\ \ k�%, �\ 7 LL'I vI 14 I a �5 1 1 k ° k _ _ _ / Q \ tJ \• \� V o O / Xo Da/ I E 2 WET _55 WET - - -� �)z Lu L N90 00'00"E 140.00 J / 1 I "' - i9 SB 8x; o=9°51'30" i \ \ Oo �� 1 \ I 0 % A• 16 o I / / / i WET 8_ o I \ p \), Qc� A SSt V A ��% �� .vL1 V A o _ _ _ _ _ / 10� - -/ I o ys� 4 I 26.67 \tS` O, \ \ S t v - / /1, 140 25 -- WET ET - \vF 3 / / 1q6 \I1 ��• I 9 . V- T 64 N7�8_65 -7 _ 17.46 y' of r, 1 �o 029 N X _ \ ct \ s� I\ ^ 60 2 IV \ fl 0 o M 0-0 15 'n S74 / Ln °k� 9 5 \ SB 8-2�61e q \ 9. \ / 0 5 \c� °\ Q I 9 31 30 I 30 Io; X 9, �X `91 o S89°0�07rE 140.0� o �' \ 1 1 \ )z p� \\ \ fl.j `� \a r `,'2 p2' I 10 - o I o 1 O 1 \s h� '�� �k •' 2 t \� 1\ 9 _' o g'36,1 �o I� '\ � 6 Io I �'° o \ (C3 9\ \ `t `�0\ 9 �\ \ `��: \ /�=19 0 - - 43.6s Ln -� ' I 2-28 -� P' 00 \ 1 92g2 X S89°09'07"E 140.00 oJ'' \ s \° tx / �� \ 0\ \1�, ly \c� h I(/ 76.91 I L - - - = -� J T 12�29 2 o M IIIII� 1 X I I-------j I °6, \C �� �`°' �9 \V/ 9\ \ p \�y \ /\, I 52 02 II II I �,� x 2 X o IuI,I \ o, WET 8_80 \�d,)7k�� >\ 1311 I 7°3.68 r - o - '' :2r\ = z I c° I X eared - 4 ��., 5 U \ �, \r 00 II N90 00'00"E7 0 S89 29'46 W 135.01 T 12-ET012_3� I I`III� T 8 0 I L�89 09'07"E 140.00 I 2i, t< o >7 R= 0 to I �I 9 o.a� o. o III WET 8_ etla°das ei o / r0 • \ O \ S7\ Ct �. \ / 20 I n - � \ .9\ \17Q 1 ° \ \ Ln Ln_ e� 9- III IL of En 1 �' I S89029'46"W 135.01 / 1 WE�Tz- 2 I III I_j o �p �o \ 9� \ S \ ? Y v 2 v 43.68 L------- T? I p 1 °�.� 'Q\ 0- % \ 62� A� \ - ' _ _ - 12 j. 1 9 II W T - 1�y/ != 8 4 Ip C0 I h* \ � vt� vt vb, d3 \ rJ�- \ ' 030 1 � 647 � - - - - -1, � ,5- 5 L I" � � S89°09'07"E 140.00 v `90 \ l2\\ Fl "�sz,, \ /� \.1Cn0 I \�I\ �=21°36 57 I oo� p 19.56� WET 1 -----J MI r \ -1\ \ 2%� \ \ 30 30 8 2 ( ----- wI rn \ �\ 4 tk�.. \c> I- I Ln / X\ I 1 'JI J/i ET8_9 o -Ip r) N \��; 9 \'4 y 1 O %\ �� So o I S89°29'46"W 151.53 9 \ L-------� / S �/ p p �, I \\ • �\\\ I e � tig0° ly \ ° \� I� I �� 90 ` 1 �I$I�I �� -// w�r a -a 589°09'07"E 140.OJ� o I I OUT�OT F Qo \ j/ I \ /��'�� C\1 \� o S 1\ \0 6 h = I n o 7 -\ 6 N Q�F1x\ E ------ I \ / / /\ �0 \\ 6'\ M N�L=1 13'58" \ out J WET 4 WE 8-7Xa a i o a1 / Xo Ln M N M N o \ a \g2 O \ 0 , X �2� \ x WET 8_49 0,2°° WET 8-48 X� X 912.05 .VET 8 72 WET OT 8_47 WET _74 T 8_71 WET 8 7 WET 8 76 WET 8_46 �a11J3 X WET'8 9141;0 WETS 7 WET 8T 8_4 T S 1\ / WET 8_41 - WE� L WETT / \ X 1I lr� x� % 0 I ` o l' �' o \-z I Ip rn 0.73 .r a7 w T 8- x / 1 1 I i o 3 'j2 (1J 06a 12.92 914- p ET 1% V \ J \� \ p Nip �L/'--------� 03 `� N I �j `wET 4 I 2 Ip I 1s� 9sg� ��� jo�� J Q\x2�'S \mod' cP., \ \ \ ✓ J o i, M S89 29'46"W 177.21 5 (� \ - 9 Xg o \ \ S89°09'07"E 140.00 \, w^ . 1 O 1 �� \ \ \ \ / a '° \ - -0 45n- - - - - oo o /off 1� ro Q\ / II \ 33 4 \ ,-A=67 - - - - - -I -917� o ° \\_ / ��3 000� \\1' 1j d /,\\ 2 \ / 5 % / uJ al \\ --�T.� 40.09 31,77 6 / to IIII �\ rn I'i I o Zc\5 %`\\ / �A6\\ v�\\ v�69 \ / 0 2�\ c p=30o20 19 21•80v- \.52•p3 LX-0°34'28" 1 0 1 �t\� 2�0 \ < S9\\ v�j\\ > L61 1/ 0 0 60 66 / i� - - - - - >510op0'02' III \ Xo1 X9� X94° X° X 1 0 2.81 I� 30 - �� 170. tt� \�'R rS\\ 3 Qc' \�k/q2 71�9 �/ i6 0 rj •Q j y 7- - o - °W 147.62 1, I 30 /� I /°r \ 1 00 \1 0 S89 29'46 1 r ' I -----J ' �d °16 M/\ O �9: orvo N / i III IIIII \ / \ 3 o / �0=50°33'48" I 137.22 20 0195 C \ O \S 4�\ n-----�/ ~ ^ Y 5 20.27- I 06 /00 �° \ \° 2 4j / o M N /I 52.95 - \ co 66c M I o j %Z50 \vtR 01 - 0 7 N90°00'00"E I-- - - - - - w I o5. �- PO \ \r� 2 �, �� 3 M I x / k --L- 0 �`r \> >, S s Q z Q 60.00 0• \ o o rr 9\2 42 �2 a X st2. I-----189_74 - - - -E sz60 r� S \ \� 1 90 y� a' 0 6 oD1 S 8 9 29'46"W 139.52� Ln o I( III / g x o2 X9 �g Xg,2 SB I 77 p N89°40'02"E I p oL\ \ 1 \ �� 1 e s L pcb 00 / -dam 0 r SB 13-UP I 9, \_ Q 0 /ti 60 2 / o I I M I I M �'2$ �O I SS� \ �3gos0ss °6, �, D/ �' y^ \ Z$9 g2g„ 80.97 , F- 0-0 -I r 0-0 \ / 4 v in I �'n �/ M R \ R 3� 1 r /� 4xx Sao \ \ / SZgo 6' ZZ of /�, ti _ o 36' III X x x x° x 9 X 9,2 o O I i� ' o M 2\ \ c10 s�\ \ 44" o g, g, ,2 4 °� I I I I I I I o Ln I /QJ I o4, !�° °y ^� I I� °� �o\ \ �1s \\ � �' I f o o W / S2 29� ie of Wetland as -- �j r\, rl• W \ \ r\, ° I I I I I 3 I Lo 0N1 0 / neated by Jacobson /� I IM o Ol - < ^SB - M Ln T 12-3 U T LOT Og ironmental S� ` 0 iM I IW M M �9\ \ S,� > y / 2°$ o II t cYJ 5 9 / I oe "e,ted WET 010 11 �' WLI ,2-1i �o v 1 I h II �\ \ 3 9��I \ O g I ,Ed9eotbo��E�tr��o�OZpS IN, 9726g X d S♦ ET 10-1('' ry M ( ,� g�2 taco X X X SB 1 WEINET 1 / Edge a Wetland as vt� A I Io 2 �\ \ �� .�% I ��� vXo by x E x JV y I I $,� / �Gw Delineated to Jacobson WET 12- 2 9 74 "r - ^j Environmental \ 9 \ A I 1Y o > II � I l \ / � ET 10_14 WE� 10- -� -� L--� ���' 2 ! -� I\ Lz-----� ---/ ("v 120.00 / �\\� �J 302.41 1 85.01 50.01 50.01 ' �� �20.44 \ 110.83 63.81 - _ _ _ _ - - S89040'02"W 1320.77 �� i � -913 //1 e go � / I ,-Ed9e of Water--- 6 a29 TNH=SITE BENCHMARK 926.69 x 290 x° QO X g0 g,2A, F / 0,2 0,2 X 9P of dP /-7 /- a 80 40 0 40 80 160 \Ix Edge of Water \ SCALE IN FEET ail �, I (CAOVRO sqote M OO M �D Civil Engineering - Surveying - Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 N Z }� E p a� 0 c V/ 0 O C J (D O 6 -0 \ / 0 i 0 _0) Z V O s l- U LLI d U I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY, PLAN, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LAND SURVEYOR UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINN TA. RORY L. SYaSTELIEN DATE 12-4-2020 LICENSE NO. 44565 QA/QC FIELD CREW . DRAWN BY CJ REVIEWED BY RS UPDATED BY VICINITY MAP SITE s' REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION 1-26-21 Lot Configuration 2-4-21 Add Outlot F PROJECT NO.: 18301 PRELIMINARY PLAT V200 COPYRIGHT 2020 CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. SITE DATA: OVERALL SITE AREA CALCULATIONS - ON SITE EXISTING PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE 0 SF 0.0% 210,460 SF 14.7% ALL PAVEMENTS 0 SF 0.0% 233,435 SF 16.3% ALL NON -PAVEMENTS 1,434,632 SF 100.0% 990,737 SF 69.1% TOTAL SITE AREA 1,434,632 SF 100.0% 11434,632 SF 100.0% OVERALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE- ON SITE EXISTING CONDITION 0 SF 0.0% PROPOSED CONDITION 443,895 SF 30.9% DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 443,895 SF 30.9% OVERALL SITE AREA CALCULATIONS - OFF SITE EXISTING PROPOSED BUILDING COVERAGE 0 SF 0.0% 0 SF 0.0% ALL PAVEMENTS 0 SF 0.0% 25,758 SF 55.5% ALL NON -PAVEMENTS 46,333 SF 100.0% 20,575 SF 44.4% TOTALSITEAREA 46,333 SF 100.0% 46,333 SF 100.0% OVERALL IMPERVIOUS SURFACE- OFF SITE EXISTING CONDITION 0 SF 0.0% PROPOSED CONDITION 25,758 SF 55.6% DIFFERENCE (EX. VS PROP.) 25,758 SF 55.6% LOT NO. LOT AREA (SF) BLDG HC (SF) LOT PVMT HC (SF) SF PATIO HC (SF) TOTAL LOT HC % LOT HC BLOCK 1 1 11,896 2800 454 150 3404 28.61% 2 7,002 2800 454 150 3404 48.61% 3 7,002 2800 454 150 3404 48.61% 4 1 7,051 2800 455 150 3405 48.29% BLOCK 2 1 7,175 2800 463 150 3413 47.57% 2 6,600 2800 450 150 3400 51.52% 3 7,532 2800 490 150 3440 45.67% 4 7,369 2800 468 150 3418 46.38% 5 7,328 2800 461 150 3411 46.55% 6 10,063 2800 620 150 3570 35.48% BLOCK 3 1 7,361 2400 540 150 3090 41.98% 2 9,541 2800 556 150 3506 36.75% 3 12,251 2800 559 150 3509 28.64% 4 10,061 2800 659 150 3609 35.87% 5 7,058 28001 544 150 3494 49.50% 6 8,506 28001 814 150 3764 44.25% 7 8,218 2800 461 150 3411 41.51% 8 7,002 2800 465 150 3415 48.77% 9 7,762 2800 542 150 3492 44.99% 10 9,638 2800 548 150 3498 36.29% 11 7,020 2800 611 150 3561 50.73% 12 7,020 2800 611 150 3561 50.73% 13 7,020 2800 611 150 3561 50.73% 14 7,020 2800 611 150 3561 50.73% 15 7,020 2800 521 150 3471 49.44% 16 7,029 2800 526 150 3476 49.45% 17 7,910 28001 611 150 3561 45.02% 18 7,938 28001 611 150 3561 44.86% 19 7,217 2800 611 150 3561 49.34% 20 8,694 2800 580 150 3530 40.60% 21 8,159 2800 881 150 3831 46.95% 22 8,119 2800 771 150 3721 45.83% 23 7,606 2800 659 150 3609 47.45% 24 7,232 28001 604 150 3554 49.14% 25 7,042 2800 556 1501 3506 49.79% BLOCK 4 1 1 9,500 2400 776 150 3326 35.01% 2 8,264 2800 450 150 3400 41.14% 3 10,174 2800 465 150 3415 33.57% 4 12,723 2800 450 150 3400 26.72% BLOCKS 1 15,335 2800 452 150 3402 22.18% 2 17,637 2030 450 150 2630 14.91% 3 21,249 2030 457 150 2637 12.41% 4 12,378 2030 457 150 2637 21.30% 5 7,482 2030 455 150 2635 35.22% 6 6,494 2030 468 150 2648 40.78% 7 6,540 2030 450 150 2630 40.21% 8 6,545 2030 453 150 2633 40.23% 9 6,758 2030 540 150 2720 40.25% 10 7,293 2030 623 150 2803 38.43% BLOCK 6 1 10,062 2800 459 150 3409 33.88% 2 10,675 28001 460 150 3410 31.94% 3 10,123 2800 459 150 3409 33.68% 4 8,384 2800 619 150 3569 42.57% 5 11,211 2800 696 150 3646 32.52% 6 6,375 2030 541 150 2721 42.68% 7 9,667 2030 450 150 2630 27.21% BLOCK 7 1 5,500 2030 450 150 2630 47.82% 2 5,500 2030 450 150 2630 47.82% 3 7,907 2030 450 150 2630 33.26% BLOCK 8 1 1 8,884 2030 450 150 2630 29.60% 2 6,160 2030 450 150 2630 42.69% 3 6,160 2030 450 150 2630 42.69% 4 6,160 20301 450 150 2630 42.69% 5 6,160 2030 450 150 2630 42.69% 6 6,172 2030 450 150 2630 42.61% 7 6,180 2030 457 150 2637 42.67% BLOCK 9 1 6,871 2030 726 150 2906 42.29% 2 6,681 2030 483 150 2663 39.86% 3 6,197 2030 450 150 2630 42.44% 4 6,166 2030 540 150 2720 44.11% 5 6,177 2030 630 150 2810 45.49% 6 6,185 2030 540 150 2720 43.98% 7 6,196 2030 450 150 2630 42.45% 8 10,197 2030 461 150 2641 25.901/0 9 10,119 2030 621 150 2801 27.68% 10 6,160 2030 542 150 2722 44.19% 11 6,160 2030 450 150 2630 42.69% 12 6,160 2030 540 150 2720 44.16% 13 6,160 2030 630 150 2810 45.62% 14 6,160 2030 540 150 2720 44.16% 15 8,809 2030 450 150 2630 29.86% 16 9,043 2030 460 150 2640 29.19% 17 6,140 2030 540 150 2720 44.30% 18 6,173 2030 635 150 2815 45.60% 19 6,346 2030 600 150 2780 43.81% 20 6,433 2030 579 150 2759 42.89% 21 6,356 2030 619 150 2799 44.04% OTL. A 83,216 0 0 0 0 0.00% OTL. B 224,692 0 0 0 0 0.00% OTL. C 113,813 0 01 0 0 0.00% OTL. D 42,299 0 2034 0 2034 4.81% OTL. E 29,702 0 0 0 0 0.00% ROW 237,907 0 171,896 0 1718961 72.25% OVERALL TOTAL 1434632 �210460� 220385 13050 443895 30.94% Gross Site Area (to center of ditch): 32.93 Ac. (Off site right of way area): (1.06 Ac) Existing Wetland Area: 5.92 Ac. Net Developable Area: 27.01 Ac. (Lots & Local Roads, Ponds) Existing Wetland Area: 5.92 Ac. Farmed/ Cropped /Ditched Wetland Removed: 1.77 Ac. Non-Farmed/Ditched Wetland Removed: 0.00 Ac. Wetland Saved: 4.15Ac. (70%) Zoning: Existing Zoning: FUS ( Future Urban Service) 2040 Land Use Guide: MDR (Medium Density Residential) (3-6 u/a) Proposed Zoning/ Land Use: PUD (MDR) DNR Shoreland Management Ordinance: 9.53 ac 300' from ditch No touch Shoreland Impact Zone 53' adj. to ditch (70% of 75) Min. Lot width DNR PUD: 50' Structure setback from ditch: 50' f/ OHW Min. Lot size: none Max. hardcover 25% (entire 300) Building FFE: Y above OHW Min. Openspace DNR PUD: 50% (4.77 ac.) Proposed Public Openspace DNR PUD: 58% (5.13 ac) Private Lots (50'x135)1 ROW.- 4.40 ac. Overall Residential Units: 87 lots (3.22 u/a) Villa 1-story SF lots 50' x 135%140' min.: 45 lots Villa 2-story SF lots 44' x 135%140' min.: 42 lots Setbacks: 50' lots 25' front (variable, 25' minimum) 30' rear 5' side/ 15' side row 44' lots 25' front (variable, 25' minimum) 30' rear 7.5' sidel 15' side row SITE PLAN LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE M M M M M CONSTRUCTION LIMITS CURB AND GUTTER -SEE NOTES (T.O.) TIP OUT GUTTER WHERE APPLICABLE -SEE PLAN SIGN AND POST ASSEMBLY (IF APPLICABLE). SHOP DRAWINGS REQUIRED. HC = ACCESSIBLE SIGN NP = NO PARKING FIRE LANE ST = STOP CP = COMPACT CAR PARKING ONLY CITY OF HUGO SITE SPECIFIC NOTES: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC REMOVAL NOTES. PARK CALCULATIONS: 1. RESERVED FOR CITY SPECIFIC NOTES. PUBLIC STREET TCURB LINE I- ROW LINE I I LOT NUMBER PAD SIZE 29'X70' LOT LINE o I i i PAD I I' MINIMUM SF LOT SIZE: 5, I I D & U EASEMENT 10' FRONT & REAR 5' SIDE (TYP.) BUILDING SETBACK I 26 FRONT L-----J 30'REAR 44.00' - - 7.5' SIDES/ 15SIDE ROW TYPICAL 2-STORY VILLA HOME SINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION: PUBLIC STREET r- CURB LINE ROW LINE I I LOT NUMBER PAD SIZE 40'X70' LOT LINE O I I I PAD I 4-MINIMUM LOT SIZE: � I I 6,750 SF D & U EASEMENT 10' FRONT & REAR 5' SIDE (TYP.) BUILDING SETBACK 25'FRONT L------- 30'REAR 50.00' - - S SIDES/ 15SIDE ROW TYPICAL 1-STORY VILLA HOME SINGLE FAMILY LOT INFORMATION: I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I �I WETLAND X % - �+ / I E I I 91 NV= 9141r q 916.31 V / �Inv=905�'7' �� CBR Rim=919.12 IIInv=916.02 +\ INV= � MH / 915. V- VT2im=9B1.9 '- 915.82 lJ / o RimH 921.95 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - E F BLOCK 4 11 I I 41 2 I I 00 y` ♦ � � ` ll� GO � � � 4 i 0WETLAND 0,900 S D1 ♦ G� 5 � , - 1 , SF� I 1 \ g�0 2 ♦� 1 �3 8�3 4 5 ' `BLOCK 6 I I I l BASIN 1 ANWL=914.59 I OUTLET EL=914.50 ti F ♦ 100-YR HWL=915.64 I I I` WETLAND A 1 \ 63,656 SF I I coA, I I - - �l I - - I v �- ............. _ v 01 I ♦ I I \ �0 ,♦ / ��� /Q C�35bFl I $ 100, O m I r 1 - I BASIN 2 \ \ �O NWL=914.5004 I /OUTLET EL=914.," ♦ \ I I (100-YR HWL=915.54 11 1y I 1 I I 0,/ WETLAND F / / - ♦ 3 \ I - - / qb - - .0 r I '1 I I II II - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EOF 0��v0l / 1 I' ' to Bg FI / / 1 WETLAND H 1555 SF / I 1 (DITCHED) -71 lb N 00 V, I / / DITCH 7 I I I I I i I I a II ►► I 001V01 I I III l II I ll II - II II I I II � I II II I I i I I I I BASIN 5 I I I I cb I I NWL=911.50 I I OUTLET EL=911.50 i I I 100-YR HWL=913.46 I i I I III I i i� II II II I � II II I I N I I I I I I I WEl I I j I 58, i II I o 11 1� �► ; I I I _ _ I 1 BASIN 3 10I 1 L' BASIN 11 F . OUTLET F,L=915.011 Z� \ I 1 -YR HWL=916.4� 1 II WETLAND I I I cm 40 grab I IF �OG� I \I Tluazu ( \ WETLAND E W ( 67,678 SF 1 I 2 I 3 I 4 d \ %) BASIN 4 �1 I 2 NWL=913.00 017TLET EL=9f3.00 II Rim=91b:3 gv0 T OUTLET EOF=914.50 Ov P 100-YR HWL=914.93 SFl EOF - - - - - \ 914.50 I II LOW FLOOR=920.00 I LOW FLOOR=919.70 WETLAND D2, ♦ I \3774SF IN - I h , INV- 1 I' O 1 INV V I Aso, 0000e WETLAND 8 910.14 58,590 SF I I I o \ I I 1 1 / illll 1 I II 1 1 \ ,(3 3 \ O ' 1 WETLY 1 20.' I 1 907.64 0 0 0 Know what's below. Call before you dig. 0 0 0 (�E a o U LF�) Civil Engineering - Surveying . Landscape Architecture 4931 W. 35th Street, Suite 200 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 civilsitegroup.com 612-615-0060 i� I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA. KEVIN TEPIP11EN DATE 12.13.20 LICENSE NO. 26980 ISSUE/SUBMITTAL SUMMARY 1 DRAWN BY:mp, kt REVIEWED BY: mp, kt I PROJECT NUMBER: 18301 REVISION SUMMARY DATE DESCRIPTION OVERALL SITE PLAN C200 COPYRIGHT2020CIVIL SITE GROUP INC. Municode http: //library municode.com/print. aspx?h=&clientlD=143 56&HTNMeque... Sec. 90-324. - Park dedication. (a) General dedication standards. In order to develop a system of parks within the community to serve the public's health and recreational needs, a percentage of the net buildable acreage based on the density of all land subdivided for residential purposes shall be dedicated to the city as public parkland. The city finds that the more dense a development is, the more demand for park land it creates since lots can be smaller affording less private recreational space and more occupants per acre. The following formula will be used to determine the dedication requirement where a land dedication is required: Density Percentage of Land to be Dedicated (of the buildable land) 0-3.99 units per acre 10 percent 4.00-5.99 units per acre 11 percent 6.00-7.99 units per acre 13 percent 8.00-9.99 units per acre 15 percent 10.00 < units per acre 17 percent The land so dedicated shall be subject to approval by the city council in accordance with the city's Comprehensive Plan for parks. At the city council's discretion, a parkland dedication fee may be accepted or required instead of or connection with land dedication. The parkland dedication fee shall be set annually by the city council and adopted as part of the city's fee schedule. The parkland dedication fee shall be charged for each dwelling unit originated by the subdivision or development of any property in the city, not including any dwelling unit that may be in existence at the time of the adoption of the ordinance from which this article is derived, or which is subject to an approved development agreement with the city that includes a parkland dedication provision. (b) Appeal process. The parkland dedication fee may be appealed to the city council before the city council makes a decision on the final plat and shall be calculated as follows: The percentage of land to be dedicated will be multiplied by the fair market value of the net buildable acreage. The fair market value shall be determined by the city council, following their review of a current appraisal submitted to the city at the developer's expense. The appraisal shall be made by appraisers who are approved members of the SREA or MAI, or equivalent real estate appraisal societies. If the city receives written notice of a dispute over the parkland dedication fee before approval of the final plat, the developer shall pay the fee into an escrow account pending a decision of an appeal of the fee. If an appeal is not filed within 60 days following approval of the final plat, or if the person aggrieved by the fee does not prevail on the appeal, then the funds paid into escrow must be transferred to the city. (Prior Code, § 1215-040.1; Ord. No. 2010-449, § 1, 11-15-2010) 1 of 1 10/5/2012 2:23 PM 1 e � Bald Eagle Lake 1 159>n ♦ One Lake — —1 , 1 I ♦ 1 , 1 ♦I 6' o° 0 151St 3.0 � 2 , U 150th o, � � 1 1 1 1 1 1s Ith (F� 1 � 1 Round Lake Lake CITY QFF IU EST. 1906 Existing and Proposed Trails Map City Park DNR Wildlife Management Area (WMA) Undeveloped City Property Regional Trail - Existing Regional Trail - Proposed City Trail - Existing City Trail - Proposed Sidewalks Municipal Boundary Q 2040 MUSA Boundary Parcels Open Water Streams and Ditches Street 0 0.25 0.5 1 O Miles NORTH 3/4/2019 Map 6-7 IIII�r.I� Y ■ NJ �� M-28 MISMAN MINIM SM INIEVAE ■I III =WOMEN 5 loin■ _ I •` - ` _ I _ zo 22 � _ 16INIMP NINE �1�■ 1��■ III 27Rice ®-- ■ :2 Lake ail ' ' ■■�_ �lu 18 . 17 - , Mill 26 ER I ia19 J■II.1111„ `11 _ '�=cam■ r.-J IIIIIIME ■I .■■. 13 3 I ■I I ■ ■. ■ rl� _.fir nI I ■ ElmNMI NMI .11110 1�'■�_■■ IED '11 CITY OF EST. 1906 Neighborhood Park Service Area Map 0 Neighborhood Park Service Area Community Park Search City Park DNR Wildlife Management Area (WMA) Undeveloped City Property City Facility School Municipal Boundary 2040 MUSA Boundary Parcel Street 1. Paul Hugo Farms WMA 15. Rice Lake Park 2. Lions Park 16.Oneka Lake Boat Launch 3. Beaver Ponds Park 17. Irish Avenue Park 4. Tower Park 18. Cove Park 5. Frog Hollow Park 19. Aspire Park 6. Victor Square Park 20.Oneka Lake Park 7. Arbre Park 21. Bald Eagle Lake Access 8. Clearwater Creek Preserve 22. Bernin Property 9. Heritage Ponds Park 23. Sunset Lake Access South 10. Val Jean Park 24. Sunset Lake Access North 11. McCollar Park 25. Goodview Property 12. Diamond Point Park 26. Plaisted Property 13.Oak Shore Park 27. Property North of St. John's Cemetary 14. Hanifl Fields Athletic Park 28. 1920 School House Site 0 0.25 0.5 1 T Miles NORTH 11/18/2019 Map 6-5 CITY OF EST. 1906 Greenway Corridor Map Proposed Greenway Prairie & Mesic Savanna Ground Water Priority Areas (Land i and Water Legacy Program) High Quality Wetlands High Quality Wooded Areas i Natural Wooded Areas (Forest, woodlands, forested wetlands) Wetlands Parks and Wildlife Management City Owned Property Municipal Boundary Q 2040 MUSA Boundary Parcel Open Water Public Water Course Streams and Ditches Street 0 0.25 0.5 1 T Miles NORTH 11/18/2019 Map 6-1 Agenda Number: CITY OF HUGO PARKS COMMISSION REPORT TO: City of Hugo Parks, Recreation and Open Space Commission FROM: Shayla Denaway, Parks Planner SUBJECT: Drengson May Enterprises, LLC. — Sketch Plan for the property located West of Falcon Avenue North and North of 121st Street North DATE: February 7, 2021 for the Parks Commission meeting of February 17, 2021 1. INTRODUCTION: A sketch plan application has been received from Drengson May Enterprises, LLC. The applicant is looking for informal comments from the Parks Commission prior to submitting a formal application. A recommendation from the Parks Commission is not needed at this time. The Parks Commission should provide input on what would be acceptable and desirable in this location. 2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The properties are generally located west of Falcon Avenue North and North of 121 st Street North. There are three properties that total approximately 15 acres. The two properties on the east are currently vacant, relatively flat, and there is a wetland on the west side of the property. The 5.36 acre parcel most west has a house that would remain on its own lot. The three parcels are located in the Large Lot Single -Family Residential (R-1) zoning district. The minimum lot size is 1 acre for subdivisions in the zoning district. The applicant intends to comply with all of the zoning district regulations for the district, except for Lots 8 and 9, where they would need to ask for a variance for the lot widths. The plan shows 10 proposed residential lots, stormwater ponding areas, streets, and utilities. 121St Street North is currently a rural -section roadway with a gravel surface. Staff recommends that the entire length of the street, from Everton Avenue to Falcon Avenue, be paved. A rural -section paved roadway should be sufficient in this case -1- Drengson February 17, 2021 3. PARK DEDICATION: The applicant is required to dedicate land, pay a fee, or a combination of land and fee to satisfy park dedication per Sec. 90-324 of the City Code. The applicant is required to dedicate 10% of the developable acres for park land with a density of less than 3.99 units per acre. The total buildable acres is not known, but for a 15 acre development, 1.5 acres would be required. However, the applicant is proposing to pay park dedication fees. The current park dedication fee is $2,400 per unit. With 7 new units, the total park dedication fee would be $16,800. 4. CONSISTENCY WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Parks The properties are in Neighborhood Park Service Area 6n that includes Oak Shore Park, the 120th Street property and Tower Park. Bald Eagle -Otter Lake Regional Park is also within walking distance, immediately south of Hugo's border. Trails and Greenways There are no trails shown in the Trails Plan on or near the properties. 5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends discussion on the acceptance of the park dedication fees. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Applicant's Narrative dated February 4, 2021 3. Sketch Plan dated January 29, 2021 4. Park Dedication Policy 5. Trail and Sidewalk Plan 6. Neighborhood Park Service Areas Plan -2- Drengson February 17, 2021 Dan May Jared & Laura Drengson 1853 Birch Lake Ave White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Laura phone: 651-269-6285 Email: ljmayl4@msn.com DRENGSON MAY ADDITION PROTECT NARRATIVE: Prepared February 4, 2021 Introduction/ Overview: This narrative has been prepared to accompany the recent sketch plan application that was submitted on behalf of Dan May and Jared & Laura Drengson. The proposed project lies easterly of Everton Avenue North and northerly of 121st Street North in the City of Hugo. We are proposing to replat the 3 existing parcels, which total 15.15 acres, into 10 single family lots. There is an existing home that would remain on one of the proposed lots (lot 10), which would remain and meet all existing R1 standards. The current parcels are zoned R-1, Single Family Residential. The R-1 zoning provides for development density of 1 unit per acre, which is consistent with the sketch plan provided. SKETCH PLAN -for- LAURA AND JARED DRENGSON -n}.998R7215TSTREETNORTH AND JJ •:.�'.•_'.ik 1.i' 1 .. .. .. 1 12165 EVERTGN AVENUE NORTH HUGO, MN 55114 r .. � -------------- ;1 VICINIEI'NNiP _ -4 , l „d '0- iii mom I — I -- — —— — 1----- —- NpF� I I — ' I •' I . L ----T----� r ---T--- ......�r.,w�.r...�. .... I L-----�'7---- ; •t[ C---- —:t I ui` ...... ......... -. .r ... .F_ —y ,�.-Es;,,r— '•+_ 1, x:l, I I a: .. 1 .i ., FIIIIRININE �_--___t______� a �---__—+..w....__y r______a. PRO POSED IONFNBINFORMAn0N SEIYCNS Professional Lana 5, rveyors w %'""" 6776 Lake DflVe NE Suke 110 MIZ '"""`"°" EpSi1NC 10 N1N0'M Lino Lakes, MN 55d14- itl.iA61]]EidEtl FAi �bri]blainl • - • .•�. .. •.. ._. What is your specific request? (Such as, setbacks, lot width, lot size, etc.) Below is a comparison of the R-1 zoning code and the requested variance. Item: Requirement: Requested Deviation: Minimum Lot Width per R-1 150 Feet 30 feet for Lot 9 36.6 feet for Lot 8 This project will adhere to and match all of the following standards, with no deviation needed: • Development Density =1 acre. (Standard met, no deviation needed.) • Minimum Lot Depth = 250 feet (Standard met, no deviation needed.) • Front Setback = 30 feet (Standard met, no deviation needed.) • Side Yard Setback =10 feet (Standard met, no deviation needed.) • Rear Yard Setback = 50 feet (Standard met, no deviation needed.) • Wetland Setback = 30 feet (Standard met, no deviation needed.) What applications do you expect to apply for? • Would there be a need to rezone? If yes, then we would do so. • Review and consideration of the partnership between city, developer, and neighbors to improve 121s' Street North, and construct necessary utilities. • Preliminary Plat Approval. • Final Plat Approval. • Minimum lot width variance for two lots • Are there any other applications needed? This project adjoins 121st Street North, which is one of the few unimproved streets in this neighborhood. It is understood that this street will need to be improved, along with the installation of utilities, in order to develop our parcel. There are existing homes that front and utilize 121st Street. In communicating with these and adjacent neighbors to our property, we have found several have interest in accessing city sewer and/or water as well as having 121st Street paved. It is understood that this improvement project may also provide benefit to said neighboring homes in these ways. We are hoping to collaborate with the City of Hugo to better understand the process and cost sharing/ assessment opportunities that may be associated with this street improvement project. • DRAINAGE CONCERNS FROM NORTHERLY NEIGHBORS: It is understood that there are drainage concerns from the neighboring homes to the north. The proposed layout does lend itself to a pond design on the north end of the project, and it is anticipated that review of the site topography and elevations for the northerly neighboring homes would be taken into consideration with the civil design. What are you asking of the city? What do you want the City to provide feedback on? Provide feedback on the feasibility of approving our project. Provide feedback on the feasibility of city assistance with the improvement of 121st Street and extending municipal services to neighbors Conclusion: Thank you for your assistance and review of our proposed subdivision. We hope this plat will be a welcomed contribution to the City of Hugo and surrounding neighborhoods by adding quality housing and preserving the natural character of the site. Feel free to inquire or reach out to our team if you have any additional questions or needs for the review process. Applicants: Surveyor: Civil Engineer: Jared & Laura Drengson Jason Rud Chuck Plowe Dan May Dan May Jared & Laura Drengson 1853 Birch Lake Ave White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Laura phone: 651-269-6285 Email: ljmayl4@msn.com R-1 Minimum Lot -Width Variance Chapter 90 Article IV Division 1. Sec. 90-96. — Large Lot Single -Family Residential District (R-1). 12165 Everton Ave. N. Hugo, MN PID 31-031-21-43-0001 On behalf of Dan May and the Drengsons, we are asking for a variance from the minimum lot width requirement as stated in the R-1 Large Lot Single -Family Residential code. The current resident owner of the 12165 Everton Ave 5.37 acre property has chosen to subdivide his property into two separate parcels, selling 4.37 acres and retaining his home on 1.0 acre. As the buyers, we are seeking to split the 4.37 acres into two 2+ acre lots. However, due to the unique shape and position of the property, and the current owner's desire to retain his home on the acre which fronts Everton Ave, in purchasing the 4.37 acres, we are left with two access points. One point of entry is on the northern boundary where the lot adjoins Everton Ave. with a frontage of 30ft. The second is the southern point of entry where the lot adjoins 121" with a proposed frontage of 36.6ft. Requirement Requested Deviation Minimum Lot Width at Front Setback Line 150ft Lot 9: 30ft Lot 8: 36.6ft We recognize the deviations from the standard are significant, however, considering the unique position and accessibility, we have come to find this is the most logical and certainly the most nature -preserving method of access to these lots. In being granted this variation, we aim to maintain the quiet nature of the area and placing only two large parcels on the 4.37 acres. We have, thus far, found this to be agreeable to our adjoining neighbors. It should be noted that there are existing parcels which adjoin our project and do not meet the 150 foot lot width requirement. As a result, we feel this request is not a large departure from what exists within the neighborhood today. Providing Municipal Services In providing the two lots in question with city sewer and water, our plan is to bring water and sewer from Everton Ave to the proposed lot 9. We would then bring water up from 121" street to provide for lot 8. This is shown in the sketch below. I DRENGSON I '. ' k ' • NORTH AND •} 'ENUE NORTH J — — \ �. %N1tpt 0+4or} •SAM _tw -_ - - _, ____________. �* tr I r_ :I �./C _ r^�"� I 1Yr4`SR SS ri U+Cff F.legf+alO t .I y Mit ' kuA-7 F, it # I ]•H _ CYAN 7 A�grfcrrr FX &P" * 1 C'}. y�r g ;. !1'IR Ai arf I —I------- oaf ,: F+- _ I* 0.41..I�A6.4CiC}Pua ,� I$LQYlG� T6 V I. IPa Pb}ftr OZLf. # 2y I}s+Lwlct r� I . ♦ s�. �u 7 sNr ---PhaiSOSSD TV R. Thank you all very much for your time and consideration of our project. Sincerely, Dan May Jared & Laura Drengson • • Prote '3776 Lino I 'LAN WITH ALK11 ND JARED DRENGSON iT STREET NORTH AND =RTON 4VENUE NORTH III I anal ;e Dri e0-% 11� 1 / ...... I\I I I F( T WIATED \\� 1 3 / O c'P ............... �. 160± \ --- ��-APPROXIMATE PER WASHIN HALF S 1 I 160± i 143.9 a� n �' I N I (1.72 ACRES) -T- 30.0 273.9 Jo • I \ I WL 1-2/7/WL 1-28 I 3031 1 < �O (•_ I V�SSG J O I WL 1-26 WL 1- 1) ET WL.130 / 1 �n W old, ore .. 86 0 8 on I I 11 I WL 1-2�1 tL M L1J n 71! 0 1E --J LW N 10 I00 VL1-31 / sO \m N IL' 1 "{ Q .43,718 S.F. ,r `' il 350.4 O 01 ' 1 J O (1.00 ACRES) tox 3/2/2020 H WET k 3/3/2020 GoI I �F-, WL3-4 54,049 S.F. VWL 1-32 I ' -=- L I 30.0 302.0 Ll_ \ l 1Li 1 1 _ 332± - � I YA 'i dr a I I N (1.24 ACRES) ,.' ElI V _, 289.8 WL 3-1 W.L 3 5 �� .....'' I m // WL 1-33 X WL 3-9 END I WL3-7 WL I-- ...... A7' tp� - / \ I z 'I•.... I ;vim y WL 3-8 +1 • I. ' Q w O I P� a o i wL -1 coM m / O ocl a w 0 30 _ O 2: ti� Ln II I 289.9/ � w Q 8 WL1 35x Lu w91,080 S.F. to \\. ...... o ow(2.09 ACRES) ° Q Q _ \�I o ® 6 J m ® o o rJ m I J W vL 1-3c 53,187S. a00 "' ok (1.22 ACRES) I I r LL �o I w I I I I ;� - a M LU m 3 ♦ WL 1-37 I I I ♦ {All m I I 2 / i O n n IWL1-38 r\ .\ n m co W I01p ^ m 44,413S.F. L I < _ ( 02ACRES): I �I /♦ Imo o 1 / L. — \ / \ / \ / I / I I V y I \ ...L.._ ... I I o .-I i 1 . : Q' •, .... \ / � ij WL 2-385± �% WLI )-'� h X ® �NL 1s39 I I� ,, ___ i89.8 • I I `� � +1 WETLAND - ,� I �, ♦ o cn I ,� I M m O J to � ® a 213.7 c I �n� I x Ste- —x '• 12.2 OUTLOT A a40 S.F. ro©s ACRES) I I : rri L 1-4o W / ~ - W 5�9 214± 1_I I I I ♦ / ilk r ' �I/ 9344 I ♦ I �I ©MH59N I ♦ m • � •. � � 934 -4 �I L 1 1 ao IOL - -r i ( WL1-42 N I\ 15.0 -� � ® 7 '................ I ' (:PROPOSED 44 859 S.F. WL 1-43 52, 238 S.F. ni o m u --- I v 1.20 ACRES °' ;° o 0 9 (1.03 ACRES) c :CENTERLINE OF ( ) I ni m I I �I:FUTURE DRIVEWAYS oop I m ® I *a I ` _ �' .Ln.I WL 1-44 , ................. I i i - f- _ 30 30 -�I 5 . o I --- r LDSB—+---BLDSB-----BLDSB-- WL 1 BLDSB----LDSB-----BLDSB`., L-----BLDSB-----BLDSB-----BLDSQ�'=---BLDSB-----BLDSB' F I !� 25.0 II - WpWL1- ' � ' o 46 10.0�- 48 END j o ��I I o .. 289.636.6. 300`299:1 9 _4-1ST Eo 121ST E N. . .......................... -- - - -- - 356± /� , /i I i� 1 r� r r I n l O Irn L- GO TII L-- y : .. `. '.. `. ,.................. - \ / I \ / I _ L/ ,{I / I \ \ L/ L_ / 1 \ L_ J \ l F< .'1 I K / \ J I F< 1 11 K V L/ L'' / \ I I 1 1 1 \/ I'. ♦ / \ L 1 J \/ \ L 1 L1J L1J I Go. ............ J L 1 I JII �I �� \ .' . i ., F-•'�.h/ \ I I Y: "/ \A 1 1 Eff,yors to 11 a SKETCH PLAN --for-- LAURA AND JARED DRENGSON �of� 4990 121ST STREET NORTH AND 12165 EVERTON AVENUE NORTH uHr±n 11AA1 ==i 1 A PART OF SEC. 31, TWP. 31, RNG. 21 ®� BALD 12160 I i 92152 12145 EAGLE 12136 12933 '.:'116 I LAKE 1z122 ass2 + I 12101 12096 49L59 4893 4995 12084 I 4950 4970 0% =n WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NO SCALE) NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 50 0 25 50 100 1 INCH = 50 FEET M11TEC - A limited amount of field work was performed by E.G. Rud and Sons, Inc. on 1-29-21. - Bearings shown are on Washington County Coordinate System. - Address Parcel ID Number: 4990 121 ST. N. Hugo, MN 31-031-21-43-0009 Unassigned 121ST ST. N. HUGO, MN 31-031-21-43-0004 12165 Everton Ave. N. Hugo, MN 31-031-21-43-0001 Part of unassigned 121st N. Hugo MN 31-031-21-43-0007 - This survey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Additional easements, restrictions and/or encumbrances may exist other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revision upon receipt of a current title commitment or an attorney's title opinion. - Surveyed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X (Areas determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floodplain.), according to Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 27163CO119E Community No. 270504 Panel No. C0119 Suffix E by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date February 3rd, 2010. - Contours shown are from MNGeo Lidar Topography. - Wetland delineation and location provided by others. UTILITY NOTE - Sanitary sewer and watermain are located along Everton Avenue North. Sanitary Sewer is also located through the site (as shown). Water will need to be connected to Everton Avenue North. 667.5 - 23 .. .. O � 2.6 1 FNDIP6617 416.1 - 3 .0 IF- 100 - -- - 25.0 4 160t 'l I 93 W I �2 1 UJ LU 1 \ ----�- APPROXIMATE R/W LINE I Q I 9,,\ PER WASHINGTON COUNTY; 0 O HALF SECTION MAP /9�s/ : I o OU 1 LU l 4 a 4 I t,9 53,459 S.F. ^� `no�of I a J I (1.23 ACRES) d`O \ 9. � I� 936 .... 99, 376 S.F. <v2 5 - - 160t 1• 143.9 (2.28 ACRES) a<o ! I N I 74,9 S.F. (1.72 ACRES) -r- 30.0 273.9 � ���� 1 WL 1 27 1 28 30,31 V WL c�2'A �z9 o 1 W 26 r 2�0 WL IL 2 O �. 1 T� / \ it T WL 1-30 \ Z '. V ti� / 9S ti119 W 1 all, I . WL 1-2�3 ...�� R�� L1l.H z I, �\, so WL 1-31 �� Ln VF/.10 I ti "'+ Q 43,718 S.F. w 1-23 WL 1-22at - - L1J� (1.00 ACRES) /2/2020 p X 3 ;� 11 93� ..T 3/3/2020 I ry i 3 Go � I V �wL1-zl � I 54,049 S.F. I_- WL 3-4 / I •• o I I WL 1-32 Ln o (1.24 ACRES) 93 F71I i N �I'�, W----( I01,------ ------------ - --- ---------------------------- - ----- wL 3 1( 53. ) `� 2 5 11 20 alr, WL 315 -- I 289.8 ` ♦ :` j 30.0 302.0 X 1------- �' WL1-3 WL3X9END 1 L11 332t �� e \\ \\ I WE 1-19 all, WE 3-7 LIJ WL1-34Ar _ I \ L 1 18 1 $ WL 3-8 � a W l� a O I WL -17 I . 4 m I ---M m kJ J - I O z W 30 o� � o uJ a L 1-35 X I 289. w < ` I O 91,080 S.F. � w • J all, 4 1 �'-,,yl :(2.09 ACRES) o a W I y o m M I Q� M ° 00 O p1 I O '," 1 all, WL 1-36 Obi '� rn �m187S.F. owY I 1 (1.22 ACRES) LL 3:0 3 I I o / ... Mlnm 1 I WL137 I I I/ l/ / N �o M G N 00 �► 0 2 / / ti / p all, Mi F- - , \ \/ , /1 I -1- , n n I WL 1-38 r . , n / I m W 01 p ^ m 44,413 S.F. / vl �� / N ... (.02 RE Ii1/ Imp . " U) ) :I O FNDIP-1/2 WL 2-3 V- 1 \ 85t r WJ2 I j .III, A - UL 1-3900 Q -H WETLAND- ?�`WL112 V 1.8 ! Cal IJ J all, m "' m o 777 d 934 213.7 LATH a w �p� o SETSP1 12.2 O��OT Q 2,600 S.F. (0.06 ACRES) SETSPK z I all, I X X x 1T7 L140 W 937.E o / 299.1 �°° 934.6 �® LATH 14t SETSPKI 1 - I J L'r�/-/-.�II�III dl. I ... ......... SETIP-41578 dl� 1 934.34 935.2 zn S MHSAN m O COTTON22 LL� 1 FNDIP21292 N. ■ ..... 934.8 - 1 dl, 1-41 WL 1 ..r" m i I I _ MAPLE 14 TO BE REMOVE 3$ 935.1 .. MAPLE24 .: .`. ...... .......... .. 15.0 - I Ln WL 1-42 a o m ~•.... ..... 1 x 934.6 3 I WL 1-43 52 238 S.F. - � N _� 44 59 S.F. /8 ! PROPOSED OAK12 ".� 34,51 p - 2 m 1 ACRES) ;° N p U7 O (1.03 ACRES) p CENTERLINE OF of (1.20 upi m o ` FUTURE DRIVEWAY->'I-� �1 1 . .' N �p r I _ I - ' x 934.8 T-:. m I I MAPLE2 - Or1 L 1-44 ........... 6 ` o alL I all, W 0) 1 9�0 . 934.6 - 5.0 �- WL 1-45 30 30 A5H6 = SB ---BLDSB---BLDSB-- SB---BLDSB----BLDSB ----BLDSB---BLDSB--- BLDSB-- BLDS.. LD BLD BLDSB AK12 TO BE REMOVEDJ .L...,... SETIP-41578 _ - •0 _ WL 1-46.: 25 WF 'I •"'•...... 935.3 9�p '0 934. 934.3 _... .WL 1-47 i .• .. ' M 8 6.6 289.6 - 30. 299:1 0 APLE3� 4 -: 9/kZ FNDIP-1/2' SETIP-41578 `9E ..... _ - VVjj���77 " ......... 9 FNDI _U OHU OHU ,-"W-48 END i ND1/2IPOPEN......... I . LATH TSPK n�1 Q .93 O 36 O 935.1 35.2 1/2'OPERYH 935.9.... 935.1 .... 3 t �-I > F ,.935.8 C 935.8 1934. M 93!;-B TREE N . M X3 TO BE REMOVED {./ l .. .. ... ....... ..... ... 356t •A/\ A 036M lJ� 4. L I� 60 60 -- 7777777* \. 9 \ / . '. ... .. ... .... ... ......... .' \ / I. \ / I \ }7 � I/ L / L _ / I \ L -- i L- ' L T / L1 L1J O coIIII +III 936 1 7.. \ L / I'. PROPERTY DESCRIPTION DEVELOPMENT DATA PROPOSED ZONING INFORMATION. SETBACKS. EST.1977 Professional Land Surveyors www.egrud.com 6776 Lake Drive NE, Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55014 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 [PER WASHINGTON COUNTY'S TAX DESCRIPTION] E1/4-N1/2-SW1/4-SE1/4 EXC S 30 FT FORMERLY BLK 1 SHADYSIDE NO 4 VAC SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 031 RANGE 021. AND PT OF W3/4-N1/2-SW1/4-SE1/4 BEING E 5AC SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 031 RANGE 021. AND PT N1/2-SW1/4-SE1/4 BEING W 3/4 OF ABOVE EXC W 160FT OF S 10OFT OF N 130FT THEREOF AND EXC S 175FT OF W 228.65FT OF E 569.91FT THEREOF AND EXC W 332 FT OF N 150FT OF S 380FT THERE OF AND EXC S 230FT LYG W OF E 569.91FT THEREOF AND EXC E 5AC THEREOF SUB] TO EVERTON AVE N AND 121ST ST N SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 031 RANGE 021. AND THE EAST 15 FEET OF PT W3/4-N1/2-SW1/4-SE1/4 BEING E 86.65FT OF W 228.65FT OF E 569FT OF S 175FT THEREOF SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 031 RANGE 021 TOTAL AREA = 15.17 f ACRES PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS = 10 LOTS PROPOSED NUMBER OF OUTLOTS = 1 OUTLOT RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION = 1.08 f ACRES GROSS DENSITY = 0.66 LOTS PER ACRE NET DENSITY = 0.71 LOTS PER ACRE AVERAGE PROPOSED LOT AREA = 1.40 ACRES WETLAND AREA = 1.48 ACRES TOTAL BUILDABLE AREA = 13.73 ACRES EXISTING ZONING R-1 LARGE LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH SHORELAND DISTRICT OVERLAY OVER A PORTION OF THE SITE. SFR - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH PUD OVERLAY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT AREA = 1 ACRE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK = 150 FEET MINIMUM LOT WIDTH CORNER LOTS = 150 FEET MINIMUM LOT DEPTH = 250 FEET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT = 35 FEET MAXIMUM LOT AREA COVERED BY BUILDING = 20 % MAXIMUM LOT AREA TO BE COVERED BY IMPERVIOUS SURFACE = 35 % MINIMUM PRINCIPAL BUILDING = 960 S.F. VARIANCE REQUEST = 36.6 FEET FOR LOT 8 = 30 FEET FOR LOT 9 FRONT SETBACK = 30 FEET SIDE YARD = 10 FEET REAR YARD = 50 FEET WETLAND = 30 FEET DRAWN BY: JER JOB NO: 20130OPP DATE: 11/30/2020 CHECK BY: JEN FIELD CREW: 1 12/02/20 Rev to Sketch Plan JEN 2 01/22/21 Rev to Sketch Plan JEN 3 01/25/21 Rev to Sketch Plan JEN 4 01/29/21 Rev to Sketch Plan JEN NO. DATE DESCRIPTION BY 20130OPP .......... \\\ \ ET N PLAN \..\\ ......S C .� i / / / / .•..... ...... 1---f r-- LAURA AND JARED DRENGSON f� 4990 121 ST STREET NORTH AND " i _ \'/ \\K. ,/ r ; :�'_ :; ;.........: I 12165 EVERTON AVENUE NORTH _ \\ `� • ��- I HUGO, MN 55110 VICINITY MAP ART OF SEC. 31, TWP. 31, RNG. 21 kk � r> / iz2 ' BALD 1 SITE EAG E w SHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA (NO SCALE) NORTH GRAPHIC SCALE 0 25 50 100 1 INCH = 50 FEET NOTM A li ted amount of field work was performed by E.G. Rud an Son Inc. on 1-29-21. Bea gs shown are on Washington County Coordinate System Add ss Parcel ID Number: 499C 121 ST. N. Hugo, MN 31-031-21-43-0009 Una igned 121ST ST. N. HUGO, MN 31-031-21-43-0004 121E 5 Everton Ave. N. Hugo, MN 31-031-21-43-0001 Part f unassigned 121st N. Hugo MN 31-031-21-43-0007 This urvey was prepared without the benefit of title work. Addi ional easements, restrictions and/or encumbrances may exis other than those shown hereon. Survey subject to revi n upon receipt of a current title commitment or an alto ey's title opinion. - Su yed premises shown on this survey map is in Flood Zone X (A as determined to be outside the 0.2% annual chance floo lain.), according to Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 271 C0119E Community No. 270504 Panel No. C0119 Suffix by t Federal Emergency Management Agency, effective date Febr ary 3rd, 2010. Con urs shown are from MNGeo Lidar Topography. Wetl nd delineation and location provided by others. San Nor sho Nor www.eg UTILITY NOTE II C ..................... 938 ...... .......... 4..i\AIr, .. \ \ l - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ....... - - *'. I - -- ---------------- t . .-..---------W.....---------� E:;�T ONNET i`© EX /Nyi 936 . ...-..-.---.----- -- 11 ! O E D R o r.. .g.....5�4..N........... 93lIik................................♦... ..................................934' r�.........1, R/W &DATED-' \ 9 ... ..... 36 3a .... 1316t .................. 9 ...... 667.5 32.6 I FNDIP6617 416 _... - - IJV�T Fl2 5E R V G � PROPD s E ID .................... ♦ 2 ..........589.°37.O�IIE 2632.22 " FNDIP21292 -yl 3 .0 IF- 1 �• O . •1 160t , 10.0 -� --- 25.0 934 �,�� 'i �A W A T E SEiitt.��� w+ LU �Z --�- APPROXIMATE R/W LINE O 1 0 I 9� R WASHINGTON COUNTY; I Q ~ 8. HALF c]�Q MAP O V E Al �` 9� ♦ I x OU 1 / A }� ��� ♦ a Ce z `�,p 53,459 S.F. / �1 /I �opof ♦' 1 ¢ J 1 (1.2.3 ACRES) 936..... 99,376 S.F. (2. 28 ACRES) oo<o ' I N I 74,94 9 S.F. 1601 143.9 r� WL 1 26 (1.72 ACRES) - _i 30.0 273.9 a 1 wL 1-z7 f� _ °j�'cc3°2 ♦ I I '`7 (Igo 0 3 ....... /-\ WL 1-26 WL 1-29 R. IRS WL 1-21t ,� /P. 1 ' I I I CJ WL 1-31 Ln 10 Ah 43,718 S.F. '' 350.4 lo " L 1-22 O `iJ (1.00 ACRES) X 3/2/204c • \ 934 I 3/312020 WL 1-21 ~ I 4 o I 1 ♦ V Wf 3� , I 54, 049 S.F. - I WL 1 32 i o `i b - r\ , I I I o (1.24 ACRES) o: I� N �ln f 6.. `, ® _------------- ------ ----- C F 315 289.8 �av ,�'( \. 30.0 302.0 WL37 , + , . - J I/ / , O I/ 34 1 \ I I / I / I L 1-18�1 O all. Y WL 3-8 m - ~ � i , L ' / a WL 17 I I _a1 o C•, O z W 1 O �0 01) 30 '4 I a w 0 ' 13' w Q tib ♦ Q C I 289.9 / I \ a �I - II 8 I _ F- U) yip WL 1 35 X H , / LU 2: I _ h �p 91, 080 S.F. W o I 3I J i j L....�.... Q \ I 1 • I / u, O '' .\ (2. 09 ACRES) o_ � W a ~ o \ \ %�00 M O p\ I O I WL 1 36 Obi i m 0 N rn h Co -� °,i° ♦ W 53,187 S.F. o w Y 1 3 1 '� 3 (1.22 ACRES) I~ • In w O 1 rl 3 I WL 1-37 I I I I .••, t /' / M U) m \ 1 II m oo �► O 2 / / �� / o I - - - - - JY4L : �1 I l o Q .... - < I n L 1 Ui II � -4 \ v i r i ., 1 /\ n IW 38 r� \ /� \ :e / I m �C ^ vm 44,4135E 1 F= I I I < I I I\ I _ F( / I \:/\I I O � ' +-I I I I o 0 o ; (1. 02 ACRES): \ - FNDIP-1/2 I - _ - ♦ I ~ 85t WL 2-3 \ k , I, ♦ I I V a� W 12 L 1 39 I I 1 Q I h ....... 41 r WET" - 2s9s I ' WL�2 ~ J �..... �� �"' 934.3 I Ro Po s E !� 5 AN i . ri SETSPK 213.7 S LATH .• -- --- -- ��\ ;:� �SEitVIcl� rO I _ ♦ i'' fl I I - II LL N x X- -� 12 2 2,600 SF. (0.06 ACRES)12.2 all, I ♦ , wL 1-40 i W -X 9 SETS T 31�1 i J .1 37.6 LATH 2 I I 14 t � � 93a.6 ♦ „i I ; � 1 1 � o � 2s9 ® SETIP-01578 a 934.34 1 ♦ , V) O I 1 I 935.2 LL ( MHSAN m - •••. •.a . • • j `, cOTTON22 1 I p 934.8 MAPLEI4 TO BE REMOVE '. I I L 1� - 9351 0 I I 9 MAPLE24cc N I i WL 1-42 I 1 15.0 - WAIT - % _- PROPOSED to 44,859 5E 934.E _ 2 2 F. 5 38 S. °D m '� I� PROPOSED 34. 5 C 2 viG� T- o WL 1-43 ♦ '~ o O o o p d II CENTERLINE OF A\Iz - 1 (1.20 ACRES) ,� N N m uoi (1.03 ACRES)- o I' 4 1 I FUTURE DRIVEWAY- -H I 1 1 L O T $ ` Ln 934.8 x 1 I , MAPLE26 c I all. I ,lj. WL 1-44 - _ ♦ I g4o...... • �_ �934.E m 5.0 - L - 30 3 ASH6 �' LDSB- --BLDSB-----BLDSB----BLbS6----LDSB-----BLDSB'., L--- - - - ................... 934.8 -BLDSB-----BLDSB -BEDS----BLDSB-----BLDSB OAK 12 TO BE RE ° .................. I MOVED � I . -. '. SETIP-01578 .- 0.0 WL 1-4G' 935.3 9,� 934 I .... . WL 1-47 I . ............ I FNDIP-1/2 SEi1P-41578 . MAPLE34 3 gq2 •� n; 289.E 0: � 299:1 I s bHU oHU ��d- 3291 D1/2IPOPEN �I 9 936 •... O I 935.1 35.2 -1/ RHU 935.9 9` :I o 48 END Irf 935.8 0935.8 34, ..._O ������ 935.7 :-� O M ............... STREE N. N r� • F A X3 TO BE REMOVED O u PRO Pc'� 5 ED k. �PROPOSEQ - - . 4 o S SA 1,4 ' •� t ��a� � M "'...... 9 IN TIC,. i .• -1- .• -r r, r- r- -,r- . . I ro 36 A . o . P1ZO�P1�.s��.D.... IL ••••t ,. .� i 1 1 , K/ r -- /, /♦ rN I /� /,��•'•. I I ` L/ L 7t K ' 1 ` L / L9V\� /I I\ , L /,.L'_ ♦/ ♦/ I \ / _ ♦/ \/ 1 , ♦/.: . I L_J'%I I L1J LJ.J L1J - 1J Ll � 1 ` 1 936 .-. L-- O �__ Z A I .. / 11J / I I / L / I I / I i / L _ L / /♦ v I \ I I I / - 1 ' LA 1 IV\ L .ry sewer and Sewer is also l are located along site (a Avenue PROPERTY DESCRIPTION DEVELOPMENT DATA PROPOSED ZONING INFORMATION SETBACKS . Sanitary Sewer is also located through the site (as i). Water will need to be connected to Everton Avenue 19n Professional Land Surveyors 6776 Lake Drive NE Suite 110 Lino Lakes, MN 55614 Tel. (651) 361-8200 Fax (651) 361-8701 [PER WASHINGTON COUNTY'S TAX DESCRIPTION] E1/4-N1/2-SW1/4-SE1/4 EXC S 30 FT FORMERLY BLK 1 SHADYSIDE NO 4 VAC SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 031 RANGE 021. AND PT OF W3/4-N1/2-SW1/4-SE1/4 BEING E 5AC SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 031 RANGE 021. AND PT N1/2-SW1/4-SE1/4 BEING W 3/4 OF ABOVE EXC W 160FT OF S 100FT OF N 130FT THEREOF AND EXC S 175FT OF W 228.65FT OF E 569.9FT THEREOF AND EXC W 332 FT OF N 15OFT OF S 380FT THERE OF AND EXC S 230FT LYG W OF E 569.9FT THEREOF AND EXC E 5AC THEREOF SUB] TO EVERTON AVE N AND 121ST ST N SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 031 RANGE 021. AND THE EAST 15 FEET OF PT W3/4-N1/2-SW1/4-SE1/4 BEING E 86.65FT OF W 228.65FT OF E 569FT OF S 175FT THEREOF SECTION 31 TOWNSHIP 031 RANGE 021 TOTAL AREA = 15.17 f ACRES PROPOSED NUMBER OF LOTS = 10 LOTS PROPOSED NUMBER OF OUTLOTS = 1 OUTLOT RIGHT-OF-WAY DEDICATION = 1.08 f ACRES GROSS DENSITY = 0.66 LOTS PER ACRE NET DENSITY = 0.71 LOTS PER ACRE AVERAGE PROPOSED LOT AREA = 1.40 ACRES WETLAND AREA = 1.48 ACRES TOTAL BUILDABLE AREA = 13.73 ACRES EXISTING ZONING R-1 LARGE LOT SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH SHORELAND DISTRICT OVERLAY OVER A PORTION OF THE SITE. SFR - SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL WITH PUD OVERLAY STANDARD REQUIREMENTS MINIMUM LOT AREA = 1 ACRE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH AT FRONT SETBACK = 150 FEET MINIMUM LOT WIDTH CORNER LOTS = 150 FEET MINIMUM LOT DEPTH = 250 FEET MAXIMUM BUILDING HEIGHT = 35 FEET MAXIMUM LOT AREA COVERED BY BUILDING = 20 % MAXIMUM LOT AREA TO BE COVERED BY IMPERVIOUS SURFACE = 35 % MINIMUM PRINCIPAL BUILDING = 960 S.F. VARIANCE REQUEST = 36.6 FEET FOR LOT 8 = 30 FEET FOR LOT 9 FRONT SETBACK = 30 FEET SIDE YARD = 10 FEET REAR YARD = 50 FEET WETLAND = 30 FEET DRAWN BY: JER JOB NO: 20130OPP DATE: 11/30/2020 CHECK BY: JEN FIELD CREW: 1 12/02/20 Rev to Sketch Plan JEN 2 01/22/21 Rev to Sketch Plan JEN 3 01/25/21 Rev to Sketch Plan JEN 4 01/29/21 Rev to Sketch Plan JEN NO. I DATE DESCRIPTION BY S:\RUD\CAD\20 I 01\20130oPP\201300PP.DWG 20130OPP Municode http: //library municode.com/print. aspx?h=&clientlD=143 56&HTNMeque... Sec. 90-324. - Park dedication. (a) General dedication standards. In order to develop a system of parks within the community to serve the public's health and recreational needs, a percentage of the net buildable acreage based on the density of all land subdivided for residential purposes shall be dedicated to the city as public parkland. The city finds that the more dense a development is, the more demand for park land it creates since lots can be smaller affording less private recreational space and more occupants per acre. The following formula will be used to determine the dedication requirement where a land dedication is required: Density Percentage of Land to be Dedicated (of the buildable land) 0-3.99 units per acre 10 percent 4.00-5.99 units per acre 11 percent 6.00-7.99 units per acre 13 percent 8.00-9.99 units per acre 15 percent 10.00 < units per acre 17 percent The land so dedicated shall be subject to approval by the city council in accordance with the city's Comprehensive Plan for parks. At the city council's discretion, a parkland dedication fee may be accepted or required instead of or connection with land dedication. The parkland dedication fee shall be set annually by the city council and adopted as part of the city's fee schedule. The parkland dedication fee shall be charged for each dwelling unit originated by the subdivision or development of any property in the city, not including any dwelling unit that may be in existence at the time of the adoption of the ordinance from which this article is derived, or which is subject to an approved development agreement with the city that includes a parkland dedication provision. (b) Appeal process. The parkland dedication fee may be appealed to the city council before the city council makes a decision on the final plat and shall be calculated as follows: The percentage of land to be dedicated will be multiplied by the fair market value of the net buildable acreage. The fair market value shall be determined by the city council, following their review of a current appraisal submitted to the city at the developer's expense. The appraisal shall be made by appraisers who are approved members of the SREA or MAI, or equivalent real estate appraisal societies. If the city receives written notice of a dispute over the parkland dedication fee before approval of the final plat, the developer shall pay the fee into an escrow account pending a decision of an appeal of the fee. If an appeal is not filed within 60 days following approval of the final plat, or if the person aggrieved by the fee does not prevail on the appeal, then the funds paid into escrow must be transferred to the city. (Prior Code, § 1215-040.1; Ord. No. 2010-449, § 1, 11-15-2010) 1 of 1 10/5/2012 2:23 PM 1 e � Bald Eagle Lake 1 159>n ♦ One Lake — —1 , 1 I ♦ 1 , 1 ♦I 6' o° 0 151St 3.0 � 2 , U 150th o, � � 1 1 1 1 1 1s Ith (F� 1 � 1 Round Lake Lake CITY QFF IU EST. 1906 Existing and Proposed Trails Map City Park DNR Wildlife Management Area (WMA) Undeveloped City Property Regional Trail - Existing Regional Trail - Proposed City Trail - Existing City Trail - Proposed Sidewalks Municipal Boundary Q 2040 MUSA Boundary Parcels Open Water Streams and Ditches Street 0 0.25 0.5 1 O Miles NORTH 3/4/2019 Map 6-7 IIII�r.I� Y ■ NJ �� M-28 MISMAN MINIM SM INIEVAE ■I III =WOMEN 5 loin■ _ I •` - ` _ I _ zo 22 � _ 16INIMP NINE �1�■ 1��■ III 27Rice ®-- ■ :2 Lake ail ' ' ■■�_ �lu 18 . 17 - , Mill 26 ER I ia19 J■II.1111„ `11 _ '�=cam■ r.-J IIIIIIME ■I .■■. 13 3 I ■I I ■ ■. ■ rl� _.fir nI I ■ ElmNMI NMI .11110 1�'■�_■■ IED '11 CITY OF EST. 1906 Neighborhood Park Service Area Map 0 Neighborhood Park Service Area Community Park Search City Park DNR Wildlife Management Area (WMA) Undeveloped City Property City Facility School Municipal Boundary 2040 MUSA Boundary Parcel Street 1. Paul Hugo Farms WMA 15. Rice Lake Park 2. Lions Park 16.Oneka Lake Boat Launch 3. Beaver Ponds Park 17. Irish Avenue Park 4. Tower Park 18. Cove Park 5. Frog Hollow Park 19. Aspire Park 6. Victor Square Park 20.Oneka Lake Park 7. Arbre Park 21. Bald Eagle Lake Access 8. Clearwater Creek Preserve 22. Bernin Property 9. Heritage Ponds Park 23. Sunset Lake Access South 10. Val Jean Park 24. Sunset Lake Access North 11. McCollar Park 25. Goodview Property 12. Diamond Point Park 26. Plaisted Property 13.Oak Shore Park 27. Property North of St. John's Cemetary 14. Hanifl Fields Athletic Park 28. 1920 School House Site 0 0.25 0.5 1 T Miles NORTH 11/18/2019 Map 6-5 Lions Park Feasibility City of Hugo, Minnesota January 27, 2021 1 WSB# 016969-000 wsb ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COSTS - LIONS PHASE ONE No. Item Description Est. Qty. Unit Unit Price Total General Park Construction 1 Mobilization (5%) 1 LS $175,000 $175,000 2 Earthwork 1 LS $130,000 $130,000 3 Dewatering & cap well 1 LS $8,000 $8,000 4 Removals: building demo (assumes no hazardous materials) 1 LS $60,000 $60,000 5 Removals: tree clearing & grubbing 1 LS $16,000 $16,000 6 Removals: pavements, misc amenities 1 LS $70,000 $70,000 SUBTOTAL: $459,000 Utilities 7 Electrical Service (budget) 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 8 Estimated Street Lights 24 EA $6,500 $156,000 9 Water Service (estimated budget) 1 LS $32,000 $32,000 10 Irrigation 1 LS $150,000 $150,000 11 Sanitary Service (estimated budget) 1 LS $8,000 $8,000 12 Gas Service (TBD) 1 LS $0 SUBTOTAL: $396,000 Site Development 13 Bituminous Trail 2,000 SY $35 $70,000 14 Concrete Pavement - Standard 40,000 SF $8 $320,000 15 Concrete Pavement - Colored 600 SF $16 $9,600 16 Concrete Ped Ramps 15 EA $2,500 $37,500 17 Concrete Skate Park 10,000 SF $20 $200,000 18 Backstop 1 EA $15,000 $15,000 19 Park Monument Signs - Large 2 EA $25,000 $50,000 20 Park Monument Signs (2-large; 2-small) 2 EA $10,000 $20,000 21 Amenities (benches, receptacles, planters, etc.) 1 LS $70,000 $70,000 SUBTOTAL: $792,100 Pavilion Plaza Spaces (does not include the building interior) 22 4" Concrete Pavement - Standard 1,000 SF $8 $8,000 23 4" Concrete Pavement - Colored 560 SF $16 $8,960 24 6" Concrete Pavement - Standard 8,000 SF $10 $80,000 25 6" Concrete Pavement - Colored 1,200 SF $20 $24,000 26 Fire Pit (Budget) 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 27 Amenities (benches, receptacles, planters, etc.) 1 LS $185,000 $185,000 28 Landscaping 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 29 Pedestrian Lights 1 25 EA 1 $4,0001 $100,000 SUBTOTAL: I 1 1 $495,960 S:\Parks\Parks\Lions Park\2020 Program Development\CC Meeting 2-1-21\Copy of 016969_Estimate_2021-0120 Page 1 of 2 Inclusive Playground 30 Inclusive Playground Equipment (budget) 1 LS $250,000 $250,000 31 Playground Surfacing 13,500 SF $28 $378,000 32 Sand Surfacing 23 CY $50 $1,150 33 Playground Curb 450 LF $25 $11,250 34 Central Walkway 5,000 SF $8 $40,000 35 Perimeter Walkway (potential alternate) 4,500 SF $8 $36,000 36 Amenities (benches, receptacles, etc.) 1 LS $50,000 $50,000 37 Shade / Umbrella Structures 5 EA $10,000 $50,000 38 Monument Piers - Large 6 EA $6,000 $36,000 39 Monument Piers - Small 15 EA $4,000 $60,000 40 Ornamental Fencing 940 LF $200 $188,000 41 Landscaping 1 LS $34,000 $34,000 SUBTOTAL: $1,134,400 City Hall Parking Lot 42 Bituminous Pavement 3,500 SY $28 $98,000 43 Curb & Gutter 1,600 LF $25 $40,000 44 Stormwater 1 LS $25,000 $25,000 45 Striping & Signage 1 LS $8,000 $8,000 SUBTOTAL: $171,000 Site Landscape & Restoration 42 Landscaping 1 LS $85,000 $85,000 43 Erosion Control 1 LS $16,000 $16,000 44 Seeding 1 LS $40,000 $40,000 SUBTOTAL: $141,000 ESTIMATE SUBTOTAL: $3,589,460 Recommended Contingency (10%) $358,946 Estimated Professional Design, Engineering & Permit Fees (8%) $287,157 ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL: $4,235,563 ESTIMATE OF PROBABLE COSTS - ALTERNATE WORK No. Item Description Est. Qty. Unit Unit Price Total Al Sports Court Area Development 1 LS $278,000 $278,000 A2 Parking Lot (NW Corner) 1 LS $144,500 $144,500 Parking Lot (NW Corner) Lights 9 EA $6,500 $58,500 A3 Pedestrian Park Lighting 50 EA 1 $4,0001 $200,000 SUBTOTAL: 1 $681,000 ESTIMATE SUBTOTAL: $681,000 Recommended Contingency (10%) $68,100 Estimated Professional Design, Engineering & Permit Fees (8%) $54,480 ESTIMATED PROJECT TOTAL: $803,580 NOTE: The streets improvements and pavilion structure are not included in this estimate. 5:\Parks\Parks\Lions Park\2020 Program Development\CC Meeting 2-1-21\Copy of 016969_Estimate_2021-0120 Page 2 of 2 H A G E N, CHRISTENSEN & MCILWAIN A R C H I T E C T S MEMORANDUM TO: City of Hugo FROM: HCM DATE: 01.15.2021 COMM. NO: SUBJECT: Lions Park Pavilion Design COPIES TO: File Design Development Budget Summary Main Pavilion Building ($350/sf): $ 2,072,700 Exterior covered spaces ($175/sf): $ 277,725 Picnic Shelter ($275/sf): $ 288,750 Subtotal $ 2,639,175 *Construction Escalation for 2021 (0%)* $ 0 7.5% contingency $ 197,938 Project Construction Budget $ 2,837,113 Furniture & Equipment costs not included in above costs. AV, Security, Low Voltage cabling and devices are not included in above costs. Note: *For construction start in 2022, assume 8% ($211,000) in project escalation costs. P H 6 1 2- 9 0 4- 1 3 3 2 F A X 6 1 2- 9 0 4- 7 3 6 6 4 2 O 1 CEDAR AVENUE SOUTH M I N N E A P O L I S, M N 5 5 4 0 7 2 0 U c� z W m U) z U) J 0 a a W z z 75 0 co W 7) W U) W Z) z W a a z W x 0 wsb January 26, 2021 Mrs. Shayla Denaway Parks Planner City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Ave N Hugo, MN 55038 Re: 2021 Lions Park Final Design & Construction Services Dear Mrs. Denaway: am pleased to submit this letter proposal on behalf of WSB to the City of Hugo (City) to complete professional design services for the final design, bidding and construction administration services for the Phase One development of Lions Park to include the site walks and trails, parking lot for the park and city hall, pavements connecting city hall and the parking lot, inclusive playground, courts, skate park pad, and pavilion courtyard spaces. SCOPE OF SERVICES The following scope of services is meant to provide the City with the steps necessary to complete a successful phase one construction project. WSB is always willing to adjust our scope of services as necessary in order to be more tailored to your needs or account for budgetary concerns. A. Final Design Documents a. Project Start -Up Meeting: WSB will attend a virtual project start-up meeting with the City staff to confirm the scope of work for the extent of development to carry into construction based on the final approved budget. Stormwater Design: i. Final stormwater modeling and calculations to include Best Management Practices (BMP) design, including confirmation of off -site BMP to meet park improvements. ii. Preparation of a drainage plan for the parking lots and park site but this does not include the adjacent roadways, which are identified under the street improvement project. c. Final Site Design: WSB shall coordinate with the City to review and select final amenities to carry forward into final design. Final design shall include professional design and engineering services for the preparation of final construction documents for the park site improvements, as approved by the City. Final design documents for the site will include: i. Removals Plan ii. SWPPP Plans iii. Layout Plan & Enlargements iv. Grading Plan & Enlargements v. Restoration Plan, Landscaping Plan & Enlargements GA.Clients All\Hugo\Proposals\Lions Park\2021 Lions Park Final Const\PROP_2021 Lions Park Final Design-FINAL.docx Mrs. Shayla Denaway January 26, 2021 Page 2 vi. Construction Details vii. Utilities Plan (Sanitary and Stormwater service to be brought within 5 feet of pavilion) viii. Irrigation Plan (to connect with the water reuse system) ix. Electrical Plan x. Written Technical Specifications This will include attendance of up to three (3) virtual meetings with the City to review the final design progress and estimation at the 50%, 75% and 95% complete milestones. d. Vendor Coordination: WSB shall coordinate with selected vendors/manufacturers to develop final designs for the various playground pods within established budgets. This will include attendance of up to three (3) virtual meetings with the City and vendor to review the playground design progress and ongoing refinements. e. Architect Coordination: WSB shall coordinate with HCM Architect throughout the final design process to manage the timelines, bidding and construction sequencing related to the site, street and pavilion project. This will include attendance of up to three (3) virtual meetings with the City and architect to review the final design progress and estimation. f. Permittinq: i. Building permits for the retaining wall will be the Contractor's responsibility. ii. WSB will prepare a RCWD permit (City is LGU) and will meet City requirements for protection and management of the site as well as stormwater requirements based on impervious surfaces. iii. WSB will secure the NPDES permit for the site work to be transferred to the selected Contractor prior to start of construction. Pavilion and street NPDES permits are not included under this contract. B. Bidding: WSB will upload an Advertisement for Bid and distribute construction document plans to select Contractors through QuestCDN. WSB will answer questions that arise during the bidding process including preparing any necessary addenda and will conduct an online bid opening through QuestCDN that will receive and tabulate all bids, including required bid documents. WSB will review contractor references and provide a letter of recommendation for selection of a contractor. Bidding of the site will be coordinated with the street improvement project and park pavilion project. C. Construction Administration: WSB will undertake project administration and periodic observation of the construction progress for adherence to design intent as illustrated and described in construction documents to include: a. Project Management: Project management throughout the construction period to include ongoing coordination, scheduling and communications with the City, architect, and engineers related to the progress, scheduling and communications. b. Meetings: WSB will Facilitate a teleconference pre -construction meeting to review the project elements, clearly define the City's expectations as to the quality of the constructions, administration process, and schedule. GA.Clients All\Hugo\Proposals\Lions Park\2021 Lions Park Final Const\PROP_2021 Lions Park Final Design-FINAL.docx Mrs. Shayla Denaway January 26, 2021 Page 3 c. Contract Administration: Administration of contract including preparation of contract forms, change orders, substantial completion form, and payment applications along with review of submittals, shop drawings and test results. d. Construction Observation: Site observation on a periodic basis for the established duration of construction based on one site meeting per week for a total of twenty (20) site progress meetings during 2021 and an addition five (5) site progress meetings in 2022, with one (1) punch list meeting, one (1) final completion review meeting, and one (1) additional maintenance and guarantee period review. e. Documentation: WSB will prepare construction progress notes, follow-up documents and RFI's for all site meetings and will coordinate construction survey and testing needs. f. Construction Staking: Survey services will include providing a 2-man survey crew for initial layout and grade stakes for construction, including an as -built survey upon completion of construction. g. Construction Testing: WSB will schedule and coordinate construction testing needs during the project to ensure construction materials and techniques meet all necessary standards. This will include subgrade and base compaction, concrete and bituminous materials testing, concrete reinforcement observations and concrete curing and compressive strength testing. ADDITIONAL SERVICES Services other than those listed in the Scope of Services above and requested and authorized in writing by the City. These services shall be billed on an hourly basis according to the current Hourly Rate Schedule at time of request. ASSUMPTIONS & EXCLUSIONS The Scope of Services outlined above is based on the following assumptions and exclusions. A. No contamination review or ESA cost are included. B. RCWD permit is based on the assumptions that approximately four (4) acres of new/reconstructed impervious is planned for. C. It is assumed that there will not be any flood plain permitting work or wetland impacts required for the proposed work area. D. It is assumed that irrigation will connect into a water service in the park that is being provided by others and the irrigation is to function with the proposed water reuse system. E. It is assumed that a lift station is not required. F. Sanitary and water services are to be brought up to five feet (5) of the proposed pavilion and it will be the pavilion contractor's responsibility to connect to utilities at that point. G. SAC & WAC fees are not included. H. Testing services and fees related to the proposed pavilion building are not included but can be scheduled and coordinated with the Architect and City prior to construction once testing needs have been determined. GA.Clients All\Hugo\Proposals\Lions Park\2021 Lions Park Final Const\PROP_2021 Lions Park Final Design-FINAL.docx Mrs. Shayla Denaway January 26, 2021 Page 4 FEES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES It is proposed that the following Tasks be billed on an hourly -not -to -exceed basis according to the following breakdowns: A. Final Design Documents WSB Site Design $91,000 Electrical Design (subconsultant) $14,000 Irrigation Design (subconsultant) $7,000 Permits $7,500 B. Bidding $3,000 C. Construction Administration Meetings and Administration $58,500 Survey Staking $25,000 Testing $27,000 TOTAL $233,000 ACCEPTANCE This letter represents our entire understanding of the project scope. If the City of Hugo is in agreement, the necessary contract documents can be provided and signed. WSB will start work upon receipt of a signed contract. Thank you for the opportunity to propose on this project. If you should have any questions regarding this proposal, please contact me at 763.231.4848. Sincerely, WSB Candace Amberg, PLA ja�son L. A erg, PLAProject Manager irector of Landscape Arc itecture GA.Clients All\Hugo\Proposals\Lions Park\2021 Lions Park Final Const\PROP_2021 Lions Park Final Design-FINAL.docx lim H A G E N. CHRISTENSEN & M C I L W A I N ARCHITECTS January 15, 2021 Shayla Denaway Parks Planner CITY OF HUGO 14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N. Hugo, MN 55038 Dear Shayla, Thank you for asking us to provide a fee proposal for Construction Documents, Bidding Assistance and Construction Administration related to the Lions Park Community Building. We have really enjoyed working with you, the City team and the Steering Committee on the design efforts to date. What follows is our proposed scope of work and fees. We are ready to start the documentation effort as soon as we are authorized to proceed. If you have questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Matt Matthew D Lysne, AIA, NCARB — 2 — January 15, 2021 Task 1 Construction Documents: Scope of Work: - Bi-weekly meetings with the City Project Team to review project goals and progress - Develop the detailed drawings and specifications required for the permitting and competitive Public Bidding of the project - Present the final design to the City for their review and approval Present the final design to the building official for preliminary review - 75% and 95% final review meeting with City, the entire Design Team and Project Manager - Ongoing review of any design options with the Project Manager Material selection with Project Manager and City Staff - Detailed coordination with WSB and their project team. Deliverables: - Complete Construction Documents made up of detailed plans and specifications provided to the Project Manager for review prior to Project Bidding, including alternates, etc. Task 2 Biddina & Contract Award Scope of Work: - Assist the City in obtaining bids — we understand that you would like HCM, in coordination with WSB, to manage the bidding process for the building. The City will receive and review bids. - Develop Addenda to the Construction Documents and answer all inquiries about the project as required for the competitive bidding of the project - Work closely with the Project Manager on the bidding process - Participate with the City in Pre -Bid Conference - Review / Evaluate Bids with the Project Manager Deliverables: Manage the bidding process and document distribution through an electronic bidding service, such as QuestCDN, Franz Reprographics or similar. Issuance of Addenda as required, responding to contractor questions Review of substitution requests, etc. Task 3 Construction Observation and Administration: Scope of Work: - Participate in bi-weekly construction mtgs. and review work for compliance with construction documents - Appraise City of construction progress - Review shop drawings and product submittals - Answer all contractor inquiries regarding the design intent of the documents - Work closely with the Project Manager regarding the construction work - Review payment applications and prepare change orders Review warranties, equipment manuals and related documents assembled by contractors - Review the completed project 11 months after the date of occupancy and report any issues or warranty problems to the contractor for correction - Discuss the facility with the staff for feedback on operational issues Deliverables: - Timely Submittal and Shop Drawing reviews - Review of Pay Applications - Issue Appropriate Change Orders - Punch -List Inspections - one (1) punch list walkthrough Forward warranties, equipment manuals and related documents assembled by contractors - Forward field drawings and specifications assembled by contractors - 11 Month Post -Construction Warranty Review / Walk-through -3— Schedule: From authorization to proceed we anticipate the following: 1. Construction documents 95% review — 6 weeks 2. Construction documents finalization — 1 to 2 weeks 3. City final approval to bid — 1 week 4. Bidding — 4 weeks 5. Bid review and contract negotiations — 2 weeks January 15, 2021 Working from a Feb1 — Feb. 16 authorization to proceed Construction start would be approximately June 1, 2021. Fee Statement: Proposed Fee Structure: A Parks and Recreation project of this scale, with programming, predesign and community engagement would typically command a fee of 9% - 14%. With the project knowns and clear decision making to date we would propose this project at 10.5%. With Civil and LA being under a separate contract the fee would then be 8.5%. This includes the additional work required to facilitate the bidding and document distribution through a service. Project Budget = $2,640,000 x .085 = Fee awarded to date = Project Fee Request = $224,400 ($ 20,900) includes reimbursable expenses $203,500 + reimbursable expenses Phase 1 Fee Task 1 $125,180 Task 2 $11,000 Task 3 $67,320 Total Basic Services Fee $203,500 Reimbursable Expenses Estimate 1.0 x Cost $1,200 Total Proposed Phase 1 Fees $204,700 — 4 — January 15, 2021 Billable Rates Title Rate Architectural $115 - $180.00 / hour MEP Engineering $115 - $250.00 / hour Structural Engineering $100 - $250.00 / hour Reimbursable expenses such as required mileage, prints, copies, long distance calls, faxes, etc. are billed at 1.0 times costs. Exclusions: Civil Engineering and Landscape Architecture, Graphic Design, Low Voltage Design (layout and rough -ins are in scope), Security Design (layout and rough -ins are in scope),. Thank you for your consideration of this proposal. Please give us a call (612-904-1332) if there are any questions regarding this proposal. Acceptance If this proposal meets with your approval, please indicate your authorization to proceed by signing the ACCEPTED BY and returning a copy to us. Should this proposal not be accepted within 60 days from the date of proposal or should the scope of the project or services vary from the stated assumptions, Hagen, Christensen & MclLwain Architects reserves the right to review and update this proposal as necessary. ACCEPTED BY: DATE: Capital Improvement Plan 2021-2025 Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission Approved at the Parks Commission meeting of February 17, 2021 — I Project & MR Park Upgrades- Beaver Ponds Park $100,000 A $40,000 B School to Lions Park Trail Study $16,000 F Misc. Trail Improvements $100,000 G $100,000 H Arcand Park Construction $30,000 L Lions Park $8,100,000 M Irish Avenue Park $20,000 N $50,000 O Clearwater Creek Preserve $500,000 P $8,366,000 $690,000 A 2021 Neighborhood Park Upgrades include relocations of the playground in Lions Park to Beaver Ponds Park B 2022 projects will be determined after spring park inspections. C A playground replacement is anticipated in 2023 D 2024 projects will be determined after spring park inspections. E A playground replacement is anticipated in 2025. F Complete a feasibility study for a trail between Lions Park, the future elementary school, and Oneka Parkway. G-K Trail projects have not yet been identified. L Complete remaining construction in Arcand Park: parking lot, park sign, landscaping. M Construct Lions Park. N Prepare master plan development guidelines and define interim uses for Irish Avenue Park with community engagement. O Engage the community and prepare a master plan for Irish Avenue Park. P In 2022, construct improvements identified as Phase A in the Clearwater Creek Preserve master plan. $140,000 $100,000 $240,000 i $40,000 D $100,000 $140,000 $140,000 E $100,000 K