Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutParks Packet 11.17.21Agenda Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission Meeting of November 17, 2021 Hugo City Hall, 7:00 pm 7:00 pm 1. Approve Minutes from October 13, 2021 Meeting 7:03 pm 2. Hardwood Creek Regional Trail Feasibility Study 7:40 pm 3. Park Dedication Fee Update 7:50 pm 4. Recreation Programs Update 8:00 pm 5. Adjournment Page 1 of 3 Parks Commission Agenda November 17, 2021 Background Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission Meeting of November 17, 2021 Hugo City Hall, 7:00 pm Approve Minutes from October 13, 2021 Meeting Staff recommends approval of the minutes of the Parks Commission meeting of October 13, 2021. PLEASE SEE THE ATTACHED MINUTES. Hardwood Creek Regional Trail Feasibility Study Connor Schaefer, Washington County Public Works Planner, will present the preliminary concepts for an extension of the Hardwood Creek Trail. The Hardwood Creek Regional Trail was master planned by Washington County in 2013. In 2014, an extension between 140th Street and 145th Street was constructed. The City trail on Fenway Boulevard was identified as an alternate route. In 2015, signage and beautification was added to the trail corridor. In 2016, the trail was identified as part of US Bike Route 41 which extends from St. Paul to Grand Portage State Park (at the Canadian border). In 2017, a kiosk was constructed at Hugo City Hall to serve trail users. In 2019, the City of Hugo studied the feasibility of the alternates and extension of the Hardwood Creek Trail which initiated a partnership with Washington County and Wilson Tool. Concepts for a trail on the north side of 130th Street were reviewed. Construction of a trail on 130th Street will likely happen with a street reconstruction project in the near future. Washington County has hired Alliant to study the feasibility of extending the Hardwood Creek Regional Trail from 1301h Street to Hugo's southern border of 1201h Street. Wilson Tool participated in the study. The trail concepts will be presented to the Commission and public engagement will be kicking off. THE PRELIMINARY CONCEPTS (IN THREE SEGMENTS) ARE ATTACHED. THE HCRT MASTER PLAN CAN BE FOUND HERE: https://www.co.washington.mn.us/2807/Master-Plan-Documents Park Dedication Policy The Parks Commission reviewed the Park Dedication Policy at their meeting of September 15, 2021 and recommended no changes. The Commission directed staff to research the fee in comparison to other cities, the total fees collected, and the park system needs outlined in the comprehensive plan. The City Council authorized evaluation of the fee at their September 20, 2021 meeting. At the meeting of October 13, 2021, the Commission discussed the fee research and recommended that the City Council increase the park dedication fee to $3,400 per residential unit. The City Council will consider the recommendation at their meeting of November 15, 2021. Staff will provide and update on their discussion. THE MEMO PROVIDED TO THE CITY COUNCIL IS ATTACHED. Page 2 of 3 Parks Commission Agenda November 17, 2021 Recreation Programs Update Staff will provide an update on upcoming recreation programs. THE PARKS PLAN CAN BE FOUND AT: https://www.ci.hugo.mn.us/2040compplan Page 3 of 3 Parks Commission Agenda November 17, 2021 Minutes Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission Meeting of October 13, 2021 Hugo City Hall, 7:00 pm Present: Roger Clarke, Emily McGinnity, Mat Rauschendorfer, Nicole Schmid, Meredith St. Pierre, Ranell Tennyson. Absent: Cathy Moore-Arcand Staff Present: Shayla Denaway, Parks Planner Scott Anderson, Public Works Director Amber Lozier, Public Works and Finance Administrative Assistant Chair Clarke called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. 1. Approval of Minutes from the September 15, 2021 Meeting Rauschendorfer stated the staff present at previous meeting should include Scott Anderson. Rauschendorfer made a motion, McGinnity seconded to approve the minutes of the September 15, 2021 Parks Commission meeting with the addition of Scott Anderson, Public Works Director listed under staff present. All ayes. Motion carried. 2. Val Jean Park Ice Rink Denaway presented background on proposal, and informed commissioners of WSB & Associates' ability to perform a survey of the park for less than $300. The survey would allow staff to determine if there is a level area of the park where the EZ rink could be installed. Kris Birch was present at the meeting, and thanked the commissioners for the ability to discuss his proposal further. Discussion included the process involved if the City were to fund the grading project 100%, as well as the size of the EZ rink installation. Commissioners stated that they would continue the discussion of the grading project proposal at the CIP discussion meeting. Kris Birch requested that he received notice of that meeting, so he could attend. Commissioners directed staff to service Birch with notice of the meeting that will involve the CIP discussion. Rauschendorfer made a motion, Tennyson seconded to approve the surveying of Val Jean Park by WSB & Associates. All ayes. Motion carried. Page 1 of 2 Parks Commission Minutes September 15, 2021 3. Park Dedication Fee Research Denaway presented staff research of park dedication fees in other cities, park dedication fees received with recent developments and the evaluation of Hugo's developable acres and park needs in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff used 2020 Census information of city populations and growth rates to develop a list of cities that are comparable to Hugo in those aspects. Staff then compared park dedication fee rates and methods of calculating those rates used by the chosen cities to Hugo's current rate and calculation method. Denaway then presented information on park dedication fees collected since 2015, monetary and land, and parks that had been constructed since 2015. Lastly, Denaway discussed future park needs outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. Open floor discussion included consideration of the Greenway Corridor Plan, what portion of park dedication fees collected are monetary or land and the need to ensure a proper balance of land and monetary collection. Commissioners all felt that increasing the park dedication fee would be appropriate and discussed different ways of implementing an increase, including how much of an increase was desired and whether to increase the fee one time or incrementally. Tennyson favored an increase that would make the fee comparable with other cities, and St. Pierre added that the fee should be comparable, but remain competitive with other cities. Schmid expressed a concern that too large of an increase would encourage more land donation. Schmid suggested a system where the fee coincides with property values, increasing or decreasing the fee in concert with increasing or decreasing property values. Clarke inquired as to what information Council would need to approve an increase, and stressed the need to have a logical and defensible rationale. Tennyson suggested an increase of $1000.00, St. Pierre and McGinnity expressed agreement with that suggestion. Clarke made a motion, Schmid seconded that Council be presented with a recommendation to increase the park dedication fee by $1000.00, with a preference for a one-time increase, but open to an incremental increase if that is what Council prefers. All ayes. Motion carried. 4. Adjournment Tennyson made a motion, Schmid seconded to adjourn at 8:43 PM. All ayes. Motion carried. Page 2 of 2 Parks Commission Minutes September 15, 2021 i LEGEND EXISTING R/W RAILROAD R/W PROPERTY BOUNDARY D&U EASEMENT DELINEATED WETLAND VEGETATION REMOVAL 1;1.5'EXISTING XISTING GRAVEL SHLD 12'THRU 12' THRU GRAVEL SHLD 6.5' BLVD 10' TRAIL' 1o'sHLXC XC il XC z H cn Ln � I 12084 FALCON AVE N FALCON AVE N 1. XC XC XC XC Hardwood Creek Regional Trail Feasibility Study Segment 1 - 12Oth Street to 125th Street Concept A -Trail on east side, no modifications to Falcon Avenue - -jjC ONMNEXI- 1.5' EXISTING GRAVEL SHLD { P#- - 12160 FALCON AVE N XC — rim XC A - qW# + r ` I a EE 6F *i i r. T� I wyw L 10 �: K '± Ir 0 50 100 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET SCALE 50' FENCE S091 1Z4TH ST N _ 'i vi iLv i i ii w i i ii w vi iLv 1 u ni \I/ i i XniL y = _ EXISTING FALCON AVENUE TO REMAIN r 1 � �66'R/W - S 124 TH - STN - - - YT .- v �• -. " ! - y� V # _ _ r r'F ILL: ' r t : E - - ST BLV - } r F r- 1.5' EXISTING GRAVELSHLD p �'' r: - `k .. •' +E _ �' } i 2 TH R - y � � �} 4 +A --� y� *� �; 4` ~. x" ��'_ �� , - 4 �,� _ � . '_'+ �� ' • �{s ". } ' _ w RU 1.5' EXISTING GRAVEL SHLD fj ' yjQir' 5 i - • _ --' t' TRAP ti 4 '� . : :`• L' ray � _ — _ - . sF FA 1.5' EXISTING GRAVEL SHLD _ �sr' - k ':,� - �� ,'_ -�: `3'sHLD_ �CONAVE r '~f ' '�I+ ; `''# Y�- EXTEND CULVERT BENEATH TRAIL FENCE i ' , = _4 �Fx" •`: !� +. ,' ����` —_ STING GRAVELSHLD M' ��� i t 1 • — _ 12'7HRU ;1��_ EXI : •5 �} : -� _ i ,{ _ 12'THRU + , �`. _ � r �. - a ,�7■4'k�.,�.. _ .. �- . z F' 'X'� �' +K.r#r' . • � ' ' y "_ ' ~ � .� : Ilk i �IT ik." � � 8FRAIL - - r ;4 -L. - 7f" Y r - - -r: F *' ;Y � Wit' 3'SHLD t ..- i + y . '`• - - - _ `r a ;•r F .-} FFa i- to L }-IL Y i J' ' diF a y ti•F + � t - ti `1 1 q l' r' ' r _ - ' k I. ■ . A: � i5.lilti�, y�r R ;. ''li a ■ _ — - _� �* 1�� - - ir ri ! } ;''+� r, �iw1�' riy �•4 `++ter ,•J 4 le +y+h ri ' —_ t 12200 FALCON AVE N 1.5' EXISTING GRAVEL SHLD II 12'THRU 12'THRU 1.5' EXISTING GRAVEL SHLD I 5.5' BLVD —_ 10'7'RAIL C � 4' SHLD A : _ 1.5' EXISTING GRAVEL SHLD 12' THRU 12'THRU 1.5' EXISTING GRAVEL SHLD A 3'SHLD i. 11. f 4._ ... k w + " y * . xr _ JJl 1f- ■ a s■ FT �� -'1 r• '. F: s ti- ,�?� a� r `,fr- •� �i' r f � : 1.�� _ :. .�� i'+ r _4 L 1 r'5r.W1 af9 P T`11�'['#� �11LU 111KU 111KU 511LU�VAK)I KHIL�VAK)r:',kL. - 1 _ `N -a ti■ _4s k F � 4 ,a 1 } i �� '. r. T. �f ~'� - -.4 k +, } - ; -_ 'I 1 N + t y, .y ram! � ,� `r ._ 1'�`��,t.• :.�� .�°���"� �r ISL T '��+�.—'"� r %•,��' w+ �- F� �-ti ��',k�.? i �'!IT r =r' � r� + .'A+ •� �' !_fi:�j- ; � F'y�i� �r EXISTING FALCON AVENUE TO REMAIN - 1•.i ��' t= ='° y. -�� _ y �i�-�'. _ t x{ a +FrL� Y ~� F ` `-IiVe '!- 1t " - yr - �j c 4 �� �Y 14 �.� —: ty { �.•sF i�' +.'�y'1 '_ r 1 e'.`.{66'R/VV '1� r_ •-` - F _ ��• - ' }`ice, T -r _ - � - A, _ � ! :, � ii _ ■ `� ' R 5 d ~' iL -_ F - _ , - ��F.t r - - ' } - - ' 3 4. +1 4 •r R - �i tr + r e`'« =f r•. �� I y f`.�'T YI - +ny,+, r,� + 1'' ' 4 , _ F 1 - r '7 } . ti- ••T _ xu1 J�.r. Th , • .. 1' " I L +1 �� '�: + -;� �, �.`. _�_ F �r f I i, { - �' + f ty ai �i T.. + } F - �• ,�"�+ �} -�" y .y 4 � '" - �y ..'^ r I ry�y~ r ++•• �' +•�_ t• .� ,, 'ti - a:a'. :� J �. - t, 'tiy ° �{� ti �� - 1 � s� �' �:.' �•a i` 'i■ �f ■ _'+"-y-r l i 1. YJ4�.�'f �;ik+ +��, 4 J;. r �- :�'. ! i 'S'r 7 T„' ■ ��.A'' +t ti. _..', ''F .I _tea _ - t': fir.' �:p •r a 1 c ,i �, 1 - - `�' �i'- + i •.r. , -. 1 ,p� 'J'1' iR+ �, •'eG '�,yl`' '.;� r '-�_ 4 • +r , 1 r - d + _ +.-: 3D.{, 'r'•7f _�. '�. -_' .�'a�yfF 1 _ } J` I S� 13.*- �����.a-ri'11 �` .�,r 'L _ ■ i i. _ ..fit '. [ .i {'ram,.' �ls' j'. 'L9 6'.�. af�'■1� r z C., i — .. 1i1� ,1 1�.. _ _ 1 .+' i' �.-�' .rii! 1� `S•`� ram+ —�+.� _a..rt� �k"•-r _� 'a _ - i_ i. _ . �1!'. �F•': Washington County N rl R Amj R ALLIANT LEGEND EXISTING R/W RAILROAD R/W PROPERTY BOUNDARY ---- D&U EASEMENT DELINEATED WETLAND VEGETATION REMOVAL z — F- O NJ EXISTING GRAVEL SHLD 12' THRU 12' THRU 1.5' EXSTING GRAVEL SHLD 6.5' BLVD 10 TRAIL 1Q'•S�LD x XC xC "A' A' Al k WA I k xC xC Hardwood Creek Regional Trail Feasibility Study Segment 1 - 120th Street to 125th Street Concept B -Trail on east side with reduced Falcon Avenue width z N �t . N .rPi s 111::4 FALCON AVE N �' — 12116 FALCON AVE N -- — _ 1.5' EXISTING GRAVEL SHLD _ _ FALCON AVE IN 12' THRU 12' THRU 1.5' EXISTING GRAVEL SHLD �� V vYWY v Y v 7.5' BLVD 10' TRAIL -' X C X C 14'SHLD . C X C -_ FENCE 1.5' 12' 12' 155.5' 10' 4' SHLD THRU THRU SHLD IVAR)1 TRAIL 1VAR \ Ii EXISTING FALCON AVENUE TO REMAIN Z N 66'R/W 0 71.l ri P. H � � r � � f � �_ � }�� +- { � 1! �. Y � � � , ` �`� ' ' `�' , � � fir.•( • 14 `*,. cv '� - - __ � ..'•� a; � � i lrt ; r 1 = a.� • " =-� ` _ - '-' � ' � Y 1 � -, Lr " r • Washington County - XC RELOCATE POWER POLE XC f ki - - 12200 FALCON AVE N _ 12160 FALCON AVE N -- _ - IV 1.5' EXISTING GRAVELSHLD I 12'THRU XC 12' THRU III 1.5' EXISTING GRAVEL SHLD X C BLVD XC I 10'TRAIL 4' SHLDA — FOREST BLVD N •.r 41 Ilk 116. IN AL •1�. y_ `�7 J f.• ;il L IF 1 'J **l A + s i` y;� •'}� • -zal �. •r J]�'..� ^i - , - 5 Or ILI ri jP T- '+y���,� .2'aF'}.-•z :E=''+,' jam. ' F yy �` .••�. '�'. a, ` F, i P. ki 1� r..- iL` ; 'fir • - _ - r •1 'a y 5•� 4 •'Lr =}J•, � .�ti •' T` l,�ti h - •-i }.� . 1. � _ . r ■_ i .r. 41 IL �dv • + _ �' 77 80 FALCON AVE N ��. __ �+ �.• � . _ - FALCON AV 4 E oHU _ 4 TH ST N I 50901 � 24TH ST N I 1.5' EXISTING GRAVEL SHLD 0 50 100 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET SCALE 50' FENCE VI ILV I 1 II \V I 1 II \V VI ILV 1 VI 11 \I/ I I X1 IIL EXISTING 1 66' R/W Ill N LJ N r-I ALLIANT LEGEND EXISTING R/W RAILROAD R/W PROPERTY BOUNDARY D&U EASEMENT �- DELINEATED WETLAND VEGETATION REMOVAL Hardwood Creek Reg Tonal Trail Feasibility Study Segment 2 - 125th Street to Wilson Tool International Concept A -Trail on east side, no modifications to Falcon Court 5005126THST%Nt - C/ 13.5'THRU 5'Tl 13. - -- HRU 2' PAVED SHLD NRELOCATE POWER POLE r ti ,u r� i it n a q L.L.. • z N N - CD� - o � , N O _ Washington .� County _ 4970 126TH ST N L rF .J + ! ` M IF - • L ram' �' -+�ti 11 �} � �ry �_��r - 7•�• - '4 ••" _ � • � - .i. � Fb 4980126TH;QS.1741Z — -- F, t.i l4 y�Te �. _ � �' " r i'. r FJ � Ly 'rG a �.' �.r' -4,d� �`— J • � • u - 'J s •M1+I�I�'- '7W . ' 4990 126TH ST N . y r ram. {.�'- ' + •Y-,r. 5000 126TH ST N _ - T JC r. _ fIL AwX. d �4y� � # _ ,r, PI E op I 40 + ' a N N NNJ- i l O r O O 0 -rl 'n T OV Aj � t c� n 21 O ' _. ^ . z z ti � � � � -I � � Z n ti� � � • N v v Z Z z z + n Z � 1 o Vo y -Z1 GU O —n TI Z y '� - p o -n It - n � _ � CURB AND GUTTER TO � _ (C ACCOMMODATE TRAIL TI O z n 2' PAVED �O O z (� SHLD � y 4 • �� i. ` • • • AIL\- - ; 15-FOOT WIDE TRAIL EASEMENT RELOCATE TOWNHOME MAILBOXES MODIFY CUL-DE-SAC _ CURBANDGUTTERTO', .. _ ACCOMMODATE TRAIL R - " FO IA'TRAI- - 3' SHLD x - r _ n� — Dlqu RIP - .+riy'- " T i ,� Tom` � � •4, 4 , -... f 7y F a L 1 C - C 0 50 100 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET SCALE 50' FENCE OHJ�4 60' R/W r ITL'" ALLIANT R - " FO IA'TRAI- - 3' SHLD x - r _ n� — Dlqu RIP - .+riy'- " T i ,� Tom` � � •4, 4 , -... f 7y F a L 1 C - C 0 50 100 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET SCALE 50' FENCE OHJ�4 60' R/W r ITL'" ALLIANT LEGEND EXISTING R/W RAILROAD R/W PROPERTY BOUNDARY D&U EASEMENT �- DELINEATED WETLAND VEGETATION REMOVAL 1 3'SHLD-/ P- 1.5' EXISTING GRAVEL SHLD 1.5' GRAVEL SHLD Hardwood Creek Reg Tonal Trail Feasibility Study Segment 2 - 125th Street to Wilson Tool International Concept B -Trail on east side with reduced Falcon Court width -r 5005126TH ST - N 5015126TH ST N 4970 126TH ST N r ` - lid - , L ram' � �' - ti 11 �} � �ry �-��r 1L �• - '4 ••� _ " _ � • • '-� - .L �. _ LP .,..:.. + .- te r- Y - ~Fb !'4 � ' - ` • '�. c - +! , - - ` - - _ 4980126TH ST NIL y�TeFJ � Ly �'rG y �.' �•1' -4,1.� �`� - , 3+'• � • u - 'J s •M1*�I�'�'_ *-[[II11 _ _ a-' r _ fd - `'�L S' � ref• .,x r.•h� di . • 4990 126TH ST N . y ram.��-ry{ ,+r �1�i ■ k } + •Y_r 5000 126TH ST N _ - T w " �: _ r:;:- ilk ,: jr i : YF I - tSr LL �..R I.� TYyI �- �r.4113- �' ., � - -- - - - ., - � �:�•� -a' ' {;�• � �• rl.�`.� J� �:•: ` is � Y • ■r _ r. op P.N Ara EXISTING CURB &GUTTER 5010126TH _ ►� N -;.� �- j`•=_ _ ' r' 11' THRU y l ST N II,, ,�, ►� - _ , N __ 11 THRU - 10, RAIL l• `n ^1 ` z RELOCATE POWER POLE �7i Q ..- 3' 21 NJ nQ CON O p rn .i N FA MODIFYCUL-DE-SAC Z z z Z Z i) Lf U1 O O CURB AND GUTTER TO � ' y � ^-Z1 GU P. 0 TI TI � ACCOMMODATE TRAIL I k� ' O� 0 D D y ` Y c O z z BEND .� z 3' SHLD i .. .- r, 15-FOOT WIDE TRAIL EASEMENT i4 - ..L ��RELOMTETOWNHOME �T MAILBOXES ` Ai �F J /V - - MODIFYCUL-DE-SAC CURB AND GUTTER TO ACCOMMODATE TRAIL _ -- x 1p'TR AFL - FOREST BLVp N - 3' SHED 0 66 F, T) •. 2 1 ,1 wn. I - - k a - h Y 4 I'•-3 f _ C - C 0 50 100 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET SCALE 50' FENCE ALLIANT oHt 4 LEGEND EXISTING R/W RAILROAD R/W PROPERTY BOUNDARY D&U EASEMENT �- DELINEATED WETLAND VEGETATION REMOVAL Tonal Tra Hardwood Creek Reg il Feasibility Study Segment j -Wilson Tool International io i juin Street \ 12876 FAIRBANKS AVE N 12861 FAIRBANKS AVE N OF S_ / x /\ 12871 FAIRBANKS AVE N 12881 FAIRBANKS AVE N { CULVERT REQUIRED \ + „ UNDER TRAIL 20-FOOT WIDE TRAIL EASEMENT / \\ .+•, _ +#:�1icy � / � \\ 41* \L \ 20-FOOT WIDE TRAIL EASEMENT / / 12912 FARN HAM AVE N 4L N �o \ N\ _ po To\ r; Washington :-County 01 �4 �* s 0 12911 FAIRBANKS AVE N 0 50 100 HORIZONTAL SCALE IN FEET SCALE 50' 4941 129TH ST N 4910 129TH FAIRBANKS AVE N ti 4940 129TH ST N / 4950 129TH ST N 4960 129TH ST N 12921 FAI RBAN KS AVE N- -�, CULVERT REQUIRED UNDER TRAIL 1pT di t Mry ham, 5041 130TH ST N • ;L Q`90 'l p / 0,9 ` Q9 �y 19 �9 s� f' 5030 130TH ST N ALLIANT CITY OF HUGO PARKS COMMISSION REPORT TO: City of Hugo Parks, Recreation and Open Space Commission FROM: Shayla Denaway, Parks Planner SUBJECT: Park Dedication Fee DATE: November 10, 2021 for the City Council Meeting of November 15, 2021 1. INTRODUCTION: The Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission reviewed the Park Dedication Policy and current fee and is recommending an increase from $2,400 to $3,400 per residential unit. 2. BACKGROUND: The Parks Commission periodically reviews the Park Dedication Policy to ensure that it continues to ensure a system of parks to be constructed in Hugo which meets the demand created with new developments. At the Parks Commission meeting of September 15, 2021, the Park Dedication Policy (Sec. 90-324. of the Code of Ordinances) was reviewed. The Commission did not recommend any changes to the policy but directed staff to research the park dedication fee. The City Council authorized the Parks Commission to evaluate the fee at their meeting of September 20, 2021, which they did at their October 20, 2021 meeting. At their meeting of October 20, 2021, The Parks Commission reviewed a comparison of fees among cities with similar populations and cities with similar growth rates. They also looked at the amount of park dedication (fee and land) that has been received with recent developments. Lastly, they looked at the developable acres and park needs outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. The park dedication fee is currently $2,400 per residential unit. This is set annually by the City Council with the fee schedule. The Parks Commission recommended to Council that the fee be increased to $3,400. -1- Park Dedication Fee November 15, 2021 3. CITY COMPARISON: The Metropolitan Council published the initial results from the 2020 Census in August 2021. Hugo's population went from 13,332 in 2010 to 15,766 in 2020. This equates to a population change of 2,434 and growth rate of 18.2%. The City of Roseville researched the 2020 park dedication fees charged by select cities and shared this information with staff (attachment 3). The Metropolitan Council identified "Growth -leading Communities" based on population added and growth rate between 2010 and 2020 (attachment 4). A comparison with cities with a similar growth rate and a comparison with cities with a similar population are shown on Table 1 and 2 below. All of the cities on Table 1 and 2 have remaining developable land, which is another important factor to consider. 2020 Residential Cit Growth Rate .. r Unit) $1,935 - Single Family, Apple Valley 14.8% $3,509.69 - Townhouse, $3,342.50 - Multi Shakopee 17.8% $5,340 Hugo 18.2% $2,400 Woodbury 21.2% $3,500 Blaine 22.7% $4,449 i ante t: ree Comparison in Cities with Simuar urowtn Kates 1 1 • - Little Canada 10,819 $3500 per unit - 1-8 units $1,950 per unit - 9+ units Moundsview 13,249 $3,500 Hugo 15,766 $2,400 Forest Lake 20,611 $2,500 Lino Lakes 21,399 $3,160 Table 2: Fee Comparison in Cities with Similar Populations -2- Park Dedication Fee November 15, 2021 4. RECENT PARK DEDICATIONS: Since 2015, the City has approved $1,683,682 in park dedication fees and acceptance of 30 acres of parkland. In that time, the City has added Cove Park and a future passive park near Oneka Place to the parks system. During that time, the City has also constructed McCollar Park and Arcand Park and started improvements to Lions Park. 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 (as of August) Approved but not received TOTAL $252,900 $100,800 $271,368 $107,664 $88,176 $284,526 $265,458 $321,690 Adelaide Landing 7.8 acres Preserve on Sunset Lake .93 acres Oneka Place 20.7 acres Oneka Lake Reserve .45 acres 29.88 acres The Parks Commission has seen a significant increase in the cost of constructing parks. Arcand Park, which was recently constructed in partnership with the developer, cost approximately $800,000 to construct. This included the grading, parking lot, landscaping, playground equipment, two courts, and a picnic shelter. Purchasing land for the park would have been an additional cost had it not been dedicated. 5. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: The 2040 Comprehensive Plan Guides the city on all development, land use, and more. The Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan specifically guides development of the city's parks system. The developable areas of Hugo are divided into neighborhood park service areas to help locate new parks and ensure a level of service to residents. It is anticipated that a 12 additional neighborhood parks would be needed to serve the projected 2040 population at a rate of 1 park per 5,000 residents. The other standard used is to locate parks within 1/2 mile from residences which would necessitate up to 36 new neighborhood parks. The Land Use Chapter of the Comprehensive Plan estimates that Hugo's population will be 40,000 in 2040 with a full build out within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. The developable acres guided for residential development in Hugo total 4,211. With the various allowable densities, the range of the number of units that could be constructed at full build out of those acres is 12,610 to 31,863. At the current fee of $2,400; without land dedication, the total park dedication fee collected for the full build out would range from $30,264,000 to $76,471,200. Considering the wetlands/ undevelopable land in Hugo as well as the trending densities would lead to the prediction that the actual dedication collected would be at the lower end of this range. -3- Park Dedication Fee November 15, 2021 The Comprehensive Plan includes three large -acre community parks that have yet to be developed/improved: Irish Avenue Park, Clearwater Creek Preserve and the Bernin property. An additional community park is identified in the northwest corner of Hugo where land would need to be acquired in addition to development of a park. Park dedication fees collected may also be used to purchase land for and construct community parks. In summary, to serve the projected 2040 population, 12-36 neighborhood parks and 4 community parks are guided to be constructed. Arcand Park can be used as an example for a neighborhood park with a development cost of $800,000 and Lions Park for a community park with a construction cost of $8 M. This could be used to estimate that future park development, not including purchasing land, would cost $41.6 M to $60.8 M. At the current park dedication rate, $30 M to $76.5 M would be collected in park dedication to meet that need. 6. PARK DEDICATION HISTORY: City Council minutes from 1985 through 1987 indicate that the park dedication fee was $100 per unit at that time. In 1988, the park land dedication fee was $175 per single family residential lot and $75 per dwelling unit over 2 (multi -family). In 1994, the fee was increased to $500 per single family and $225 per multi -family unit. In 2002, $1,700 was charged per residential unit and $1,800 per acre of commercial and industrial. The required land dedication went from 7% to 10% in 2003. In 2005, significant changes were made to the policy with the help of the Park Dedication Fund Subcommittee and the fee was set at $2,400 per residential unit and per acre of commercial. In 2010, changes were made to the Park Dedication Policy, but not the fee. The policy was changed to include a sliding scale of land to be dedicated based on density of a development. This allows the overall dedication to be in balance with the increased need for parks created by the additional residents. The requirement for commercial and industrial dedication was removed. Staff did not find approvals where commercial and industrial developments were charged park dedication while that requirement was in effect between 2002 and 2010. An appeal process was also added to the policy, in keeping with state statutes. 7. PARK DEDICATION POLICY REVIEW: After their review in September 2021, the Parks Commission did not recommend changes to the Park Dedication Ordinance and agreed that it continues to serve the City of Hugo well and is in keeping with Minnesota Statute 462.358: • Funds collected are used only for purchasing park land or construction of new park amenities through the use of the Special Park Fund. These funds are not used for maintenance or operation. -4- Park Dedication Fee November 15, 2021 • The Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan guide how the Special Park Fund shall be used. • The sliding scale of land and per unit fee allows park dedication to be charged based on the fair market value of the unplatted land. Developments of a similar land use and property value are charged park dedication similarly. • There shall be a nexus between park dedication collected and the need generated by the development 7. PARKS COMMISSION DISCUSSION: At their meeting of October 20, 2021, The Parks Commission reviewed a comparison of fees among cities with similar populations and cities with similar growth rates. They also looked at the amount of park dedication (fee and land) that has been received with recent developments. Lastly, they looked at the developable acres and park needs outlined in the Comprehensive Plan. The Parks Commission discussed that the fee should be increased by $1,000, effective in 2022. The following points were discussed that led to their recommendation: • Developments should pay for the need for new parks they generate in the Hugo parks system • The fee has not changed since 2005 • Costs of park construction have increased • Property values in Hugo have increased • Costs of purchasing park land have increased • Costs of residential construction have increased resulting in increased home prices • An increase in park dedication would also be passed on to residents • Residential growth continues at the increased home price • The proposed increase would put Hugo's fee in line with cities of a similar population • The proposed increase would put Hugo's fee just below average compared to cities of a similar growth rate 8. RECOMMENDATION: The Parks Commission recommends that the City Council increase the park dedication fee to $3,400 with the 2022 fee schedule. The new fee will not be retroactive and will not apply to existing lots of record or to property that is subject to a development agreement approved prior to January 1, 2022. -5- Park Dedication Fee November 15, 2021 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Park Dedication Policy 2. Fee Schedule 3. 2020 Park Dedication Fees by City 4. Growth -leading Communities 5. Table 3-3 Land Use Density 6. Table 6-5 Parks Servicing Neighborhood Park Service Areas. 7. Neighborhood Park Service Areas 8. Park Dedication Log 9. Resolution 2021-70 Approving Findings of Fact for Increasing the Park Dedication Fee -6- Park Dedication Fee November 15, 2021 Municode http: //Iibrary.municode. com/print. aspx?h=&cl i entID=143 5 6&HTNMeque... Sec. 90-324. - Park dedication. (a) General dedication standards. In order to develop a system of parks within the community to serve the public's health and recreational needs, a percentage of the net buildable acreage based on the density of all land subdivided for residential purposes shall be dedicated to the city as public parkland. The city finds that the more dense a development is, the more demand for park land it creates since lots can be smaller affording less private recreational space and more occupants per acre. The following formula will be used to determine the dedication requirement where a land dedication is required: Density Percentage of Land to be Dedicated (of the buildable [and) 0-3.99 units per acre 10 percent 4.00-5.99 units per acre 11 percent 6.00-7.99 units per acre 13 percent 8.00-9.99 units per acre 15 percent 10.00 < units per acre 17 percent The land so dedicated shall be subject to approval by the city council in accordance with the city's Comprehensive Plan for parks. At the city council's discretion, a parkland dedication fee may be accepted or required instead of or connection with land dedication. The parkland dedication fee shall be set annually by the city council and adopted as part of the city's fee schedule. The parkland dedication fee shall be charged for each dwelling unit originated by the subdivision or development of any property in the city, not including any dwelling unit that may be in existence at the time of the adoption of the ordinance from which this article is derived, or which is subject to an approved development agreement with the city that includes a parkland dedication provision. (b) Appeal process. The parkland dedication fee may be appealed to the city council before the city council makes a decision on the final plat and shall be calculated as follows: The percentage of land to be dedicated will be multiplied by the fair market value of the net buildable acreage. The fair market value shall be determined by the city council, following their review of a current appraisal submitted to the city at the developer's expense. The appraisal shall be made by appraisers who are approved members of the SREA or MAI, or equivalent real estate appraisal societies. If the city receives written notice of a dispute over the parkland dedication fee before approval of the final plat, the developer shall pay the fee into an escrow account pending a decision of an appeal of the fee. If an appeal is not filed within 60 days following approval of the final plat, or if the person aggrieved by the fee does not prevail on the appeal, then the funds paid into escrow must be transferred to the city. (Prior Code, § 1215-040.1; Ord. No. 2010-449, § 1, 11-15-2010) 1 of 1 10/5/2012 2:23 PM 9/14/2017 Commercial or residential $120.00 building DEVELOPMENT FEES Escrow for engineering 4% and legal Letter of credit or cash 125% escrow City engineering technician $93.00 inspections rparkland dedication: Commercial and industrial Exempt Residential $2,400.0 Sealcoating $4.00 Snowplowing $0.500 Stormwater trunk fee $0.07 LOCAL GOVERNMENT UNIT (LGU) FEES No -loss exemption determination Delineation approval: Less than 10 acres site Hugo, MN Code of Ordinances $1,000.00 of cost of improvements of cost of improvements per hour unit lineal foot lineal foot square foot of net elopable area https://library.municode.com/mn/hugo/codes/code_of_ordinances?nodeld=COOR_CH30FE 7/16 City Mr (Per Unit) (Per UnilwUpolation Falcon Heights 8% 8 % 5,369 0.9% Richfield $0 $0 36,994 5.0% Shoreview 4% 4% 26,921 7.5% Golden Valley 6% 6 % 22,552 10.7% Fridley $1,500 $1,500 29,590 8.7% St. Louis Park $1,500 $1,500 50,010 10.5% Hugo $2,400 $2,400 15,766 18.2% Forest Lake $2,500 20,611 12.2 % Burnsville $2,717 $2,717 64,317 6.7% Inver Grove Hights $2,850 $2,850 35,791 5.6% Oakdale $2,886 $2,886 28,303 3.3% Lino Lakes Average W Cottage Grove $3,400 $3,160 $3,329 $3,400 21,399 38,839 5.8% 12.3% Andover $3,415 $3,475 32,601 6.5% Moundsview $3,500 $3,500 13,249 9.0% Woodbury $3,500 $3,500 75,102 21.2% Maplewood $3,540 $3,540 42,088 10.7% Eagan $3,579 $3,722 68,855 7.2% Roseville $4,000 $4,000 36,254 7.7% Maple Grove $4,262 $4,177 70,253 14.1% Champlin $4,370 $4,370 23,919 3.5% Blaine $4,320 $4,449 70,222 22.7% Brooklyn Park $4,600 $4,600 86,478 14.1% Shakopee $5,340 $5,340 43,698 17.8% Bloomington $5,700 $5,700 89,987 8.5% Eden Prairie $6,500 $6,500 64,198 5.6% Plymouth $8,000 $8,000 81,026 14.8% Brooklyn Center $0 / Acre $0 / Acre 33,782 12.2% White Bear Lake $1,200 single family $1,000 for townhomes/condos/duplex$750 per 1 bed unit +$115/bedroom 24,883 4.5% Apple Valley $iTown Townhouse, Single $3,342 03-Mult9 $i Town Townhouse, Single $3,342.503- Multi 56,374 14.8% Little Canada $3,500 $3500 per unit- 1-8 units $1,950 per unit - 9+ units 10,819 10.7% Chanhassen $5,800 - Single Family, $5,000 - Duplex, $3,800-Multi $5,800 - Single Family, $5,000 - Duplex, $3,800-Multi 25,947 13.0% Lakeville Low Density: $4,294, Medium Density: $2,922, High Density: $2,240 Low Density: $4,509, Medium Density: $3,068, High Density: $2,352 69,490 24.2% * Growth -Leading Communities in the Twin Cities Region Source: City of Roseville, September 2021 Groilling CDMMUnftieS in 1he Twin Cities regiDn city 2010 PopAgcn 2MO PapAndon PapullsOmn added_ gmw1 1 1 1 Iry 2m Minneapolis 382,578 429.954 47.376 12.4% Saint Paul 285,068 311.527 26,459 9.39'a Lakeville 55,954 69,490 13,536 24.2% Woodbury 61,961 75,102 13,141 21290 Blaine 57,186 70,222 13,036 22.8% Brooklyn Park 75,781 86,478 10,697 14.10/. Plymouth 70,576 81,025 10,450 14.8% 61,567 70,253 8,696 Maple Grove 14.1 % ,fipple Valley 49,084 56,374 7,290 14.9% Bloomington 82,893 89,987 7,094 8.6% Twin Cides region 2,849.567 3,163,104 313,537 11.0% total Source: https://metrocouncil.org/Data-and-Maps/Research-and-Data/Annual-Population-Estimates.aspx 10/08/2021 Table 3-3 2040 Land Use Dens Very Low density Residential 1 Unit/Acre 72 72 72 Low density Residential 2 - 4 Units/Acre 2,498 4,996 9,992 Medium Density Residential 3 - 8 Units/Acre 498 1,494 3,948 High Density Residential 6 -12 Units kre 103 618 1,236 Mixed Use (50%) 16 - 60 Units/Acre 223 2,230 13,380 Total 3,394 9,410 28,664 Plat Monitoring Data 817 3,200 3,200 Total Units 4,211 12,810 31,864 Density 3.0 7.6 NP-1 N P-2 N P-3 150 17 153 Lions Park* NP-4 Frog Hollow Park 4,215 Heritage Ponds Park Arbre Park Aspire Park Val Jean Park NP-5 Victor Square 1,840 Clearwater Creek Preserve* McCollar Park Cove Park NP-6 Tower Park 1,329 Oak Shore Park NP-7 Beaver Ponds Park 990 NP-8 1,508 NP-9 Diamond Point Park 1,222 NP-10 Oneka Lake Park 1,685 NP-11 102 NP-12 163 Rice Lake Park* Eastern Hugo Hanifl Fields Athletic Park* 3,171 Irish Avenue Park* *Indicates Community Park. All others are Neighborhood Parks �, CITY OF GO 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 0 0 0 1 1-3 Yes 0 0 0 1 3-4 Yes 0 0 0 1 2-3 Yes 46.7 3 1 1.2 1-3 No 115.27 7 N 1-3 M 11.2 2 0 1 1-3 No 15 1 0 1 1-3 Maybe 0 0 0 1 1-3 Yes 12.6 1 0 1 1-3 No 10.3 1 0 1 1-3 Yes 0 0 0 1 1-3 Yes 0 0 0 1 1-3 Yes 195 3 0 Not Urban Not Urban Not Urban PARKS, TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE 145 Neighborhood Park Service Area Map 0 Neighborhood Park Service Area Community Park Search Area City Park DNR Wildlife Management Area (WMA) Undeveloped City Property J&L City Facility School Municipal Boundary Q 2040 MUSA Boundary Parcel Street 1. Paul Hugo Farms WMA 15. Rice Lake Park 2. Lions Park 16.Oneka Lake Boat Launch 3. Beaver Ponds Park 17. Irish Avenue Park 4. Tower Park 18. Cove Park 5. Frog Hollow Park 19. Aspire Park 6. Victor Square Park 20.Oneka Lake Park 7. Arbre Park 21. Bald Eagle Lake Access 8. Clearwater Creek Preserve 22. Bernin Property 9. Heritage Ponds Park 23. Sunset Lake Access South 10. Val Jean Park 24. Sunset Lake Access North 11. McCollar Park 25. Goodview Property 12. Diamond Point Park 26. Plaisted Property 13.Oak Shore Park 27. Property North of St. John's Cemetary 14. Hanifl Fields Athletic Park 28. 1920 School House Site 0 0.25 0.5 1 O Miles 3/4/2019 NORTH Map 6-5 Park Dedication Fees City of Hugo Updated October 8, 2021 PROJECT Parks Commission Approval City Council Approval Received Notes James Leroux Lot Split NA NA $4,800 2013 7131 132nd Street NA NA $2,400 2013 Fable Hills 3rd $ 12,000.00 March 9, 2011 PUD, Prelim Plat: May 16, 2011 Final Plat: June 20, 2011 $12,000 2013 Pluss Outlot A 8 grading improvements for 5 lots ag $154, 524.00 June 9, 2010 Prelim Plat, Rezone: 6/21 /2011 67 acres land (N. of Oneka Elem. given to LAS) for 79 lots and $1,956 per lot Village 1st RESOs 1st Et 2nd Add: 8/16/2010 $11,736 2010? $21, 916 2012 6 lots 11 lots a a 2nd 7Vittage Village 3rd Final Plat: Jul 14, 2014 $62,592 2014 _ 32 lots a a 4th 6/15/2015 $48,900 2015 _ 25 lots $9,780 TBD 5 Meadows $136,800 February 26, 2014 Prelim Plat: March 3, 2014 57 lots to ay $2,400 per lot= 136,800 Fx Fox Meadows Fist Addition 1 1 $81,600 1 2015? 34 lots Fox Meadows Second Addition I 2-Feb-I5 $55,200 1 2015123 lots Fable Hills 4th May 13, 2015 63 lots: 26 lots of phase 1= park, future phases pay $2,400 per unit Phase 1 Land 7/7/2015 26 lots Outlot A (McCollar Park Improvements) Phase 2- 5th Addition $50,400 2017 11 lots Fable Hills 6th $38,400 2019 16 lots FUTURE $28,800 TBD 12 lots valle Fields December 11, 2013 dL Prelim a PUD Dec 11, 2013 Outlot A (2.11 acres) plus 23% cash in lieu First Addition (Keystone Place) Final Plat Et DA: July 14, 13 Land 2014 2.11 Acres Hugo Garden Apartments May 20, 2020 $87,414 2020 23% of the fee per unit RooneySubdivision $2,400 2014 Brigg Backer Subdivision $2,400 2016 Sathre Subdivision $2,400 2017 Verdick Subdivision $2,400 2017 arwater Cove August 12, 2015 9 lots to pay $2,400 per lot (Park dedicated w/o credit) 1st $67,200 2015 28lots 2nd $64,800 2016 27lots 3rd 4th $33,600 2016 14lots $48,000 2017 20lots elaide Landing March 12, 2017 10/2/2017 7.8 acres park land plus $1,128 per unit for 324 total lots 81 lots 70 lots 1st Addition $91,368 $78,960 2017 2018 2nd Addition 3rd Addition $24,816 2019 22 lots 4th Addition $22,560 2019 20 lots 5th Addition $89,112 2020 79 lots 6th Addition $51,888 2021 52 lots Good Live Senior Living (Formerly DigniCare) October 4, 2015 1 $ 76,800.00 2017 32 unites at $2,400 per unit Oneka Place June 16, 2018 1 1 2019 Outlot J (20.7 acres) Moxness Subdivision Rosemary Apartments I March 20, 20191 Frenchman Place 4th Fee x 45 units $108,000 2020 45lots Rice Lake Reserve November 20, 2019 $ 216,000.00 11 $100,770 2021142 minus $30 1 FUTURE 1 $115,230 TBD 48 +$30 ugo Meadows/ The Meadows at Hugo February 17, 2021 $208,000 Fee x 87 units Phase 1 1 $112,800 2021 47 FUTURE PHASE 2 1 1 1 $96,000 TBD 40 Oneka lake Reserve/ Dupree I April 21,20211 1.45 acres + 48% of the Fee x 40 lots FUTURE I 1 1 $46,080 1 TBD TBD Oneka Commons Jan 15, 2020. NOT APPROVED FUTURE Acres of Bald Eagle/ Drengson Property 17-Feb-21 1 1 17 units x $2,400 FUTURE i 1 $16,800 1 TBD 7 units RESOLUTION 2021-70 APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR INCREASING THE PARK DEDICATION FEE WHEREAS, the City of Hugo desires to develop a system of parks within the community to serve the public's health and recreation needs, and; WHEREAS, the City of Hugo has adopted a Parks, Trails and Open Space Plan that identifies reasonable needs for parks and recreational facilities based on the demand placed on the park system by the projected population increase associated with new residential development in the community, and; WHEREAS, the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission reviewed the Park Dedication Fee at their meeting of October 21, 2021 and recommended it be increased to $3,400 per residential unit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does support the increase in the park dedication fee, based on the following findings: 1. Funds collected through park dedication are used only for the acquisition and development of parks and recreation facilities, or other allowable park system improvements and placed in the Special Park Fund. 2. The Parks Capital Improvement Plan and Parks, Trails, and Open Space Plan direct how the Special Park Fund shall be used. 3. Sec. 90-324 PARK DEDICATION authorizes a sliding scale of land to be dedicated based on density and the use of per unit fee allows park dedication to be charged based on the fair market value of the unplatted land. 4. The cost of park construction and purchasing park land has increased. 5. Property values in Hugo have increased. 6. There is a nexus between the increased park dedication fee to be collected and the increased demand on the Hugo parks system created by residential development. ADOPTED by the City Council this 15'h day of November 2021. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk Tuesday, January 4th 10:30 a.m. Hugo City Hall Registration Required Funded by: Join MacPhail Center for Music's early childhood music specialists for La Musica y la Familia! at the Hugo City Hall. We will explore the magic of music and play. Through hands-on musical play activities families will experience music's impact on learning and diness. Together we will sing, rhyme, read, move and 'rogram and materials will be provided in Spanish. Recommended for ages 0-5. City Hall 1 14669 Fitzgerald Ave N I Hugo, MN Connect with us on social media: @WashCoLib goo