Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022.05.16 CC Packet A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. May 2, 2022, City Council Meeting E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Hugo Fire Department 2022 Annual Report 2. Swearing in of Jason Palmquist as Training Captain on the Hugo Fire Department 3. Swearing in of Ryan Nadeau as Training Lieutenant of the Hugo Fire Department 4. M Health Fairview EMS 2021 Annual Report 5. Hugo Good Neighbor Days Special Event Permit G. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion and a roll call vote. If a member of the City Council or the public wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approve Claims Roster 2. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Rick Kieffer 3. Approve Resignation of Planning Commissioner Maria Mulvihill 4. Approve Resignation of Planning Commissioner David Fry 5. Approve Scott Arcand as an Interim Planning Commissioner 6. Approve Advertisement for Commissioners 7. Approve Reimbursement of Costs for Expert Services Related to DNR Groundwater Model 8. Approve Auto-Aid Agreement Between the City of Hugo and Centennial Fire District 9. Approve Resolution Approving Site Plan for Oneka Elementary 10. Approve Encroachment Agreement for 13123 Fondant Trail North – Rogers 11. Approve Encroachment Agreement for 13397 Fondant Trail North – Venerzzo 12. Approve Encroachment Agreement for 13455 Fondant Trail North - Schneider 13. Approve Pay Request No. 9 for Schreiber Mullaney for Lions Park Building 14. Approve Donation of Land on Education Drive and Falcon Circle from Barbara N Hanson Trust Agenda HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HUGO CITY HALL MONDAY, MAY 16, 2022 – 7 P.M. H. PUBLIC HEARING 1. None Scheduled I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. Approve Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for the Oneka Parkway Project J. NEW BUSINESS 1. Review Premier Bank Sketch Plan K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. None Scheduled L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. None Scheduled M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. City Administrator Performance Review on June 6, 2022 - Reminder 2. N. ADJOURNMENT BACKGROUND MEMO FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON MAY 16, 2022 F.1 Hugo Fire Department 2021 Annual Report Fire Chief Jim Compton, Jr. will present the Hugo Fire Department Annual Report for 2021. F.2 Swearing in of Jason Palmquist as Training Captain on the Hugo Fire Department At their March 21, 2022 meeting, Council approved the promotion of Jason Palmquist to training captain when Ross Hoernemann was moved to safety captain. Fire Chief Jim Compton will swear in Jason Palmquist as Training Captain. F.3 Swearing in of Ryan Nadeau as Training Lieutenant of the Hugo Fire Department At their May 5, 2022 meeting, Council approved the promotion of Ryan Nadeau to training lieutenant when Jason Palmquist was promoted to training captain. Fire Chief Jim Compton, Jr. will swear in Ryan Nadeau as Training Lieutenant of the Hugo Fire Department F.4 M Health Fairview EMS 2021 Annual Report M Health Operations Manager Kevin Kane will be in attendance to present the M Health Fairview EMS 2021 Annual Report. F.5 Hugo Good Neighbor Days Special Event Permit The Hugo Good Neighbor Days Festival will be held Thursday, June 9th - Sunday, June 12th. The festival this year will be held at the Hanifl Shelter and Fields due to the reconstruction of Lions Park. Lions member Dan Balthazor will be in attendance to answer any questions the Council may have and will request the Council co-sponsor the event by waiving the Special Event Permit fee and providing police protection for the event, as in the past. G.1 Approve Claims Roster Staff recommends Council approve the Claims Roster as presented. G.2 Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Rick Kieffer Rick Kieffer was re-hired by the City of Hugo on May 31, 2005 returning after a short period of time in the private sector. Rick has worked under the direction of Public Works Director Scott Anderson who recommends Council approve the Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Rick Kieffer. G.3 Approve Resignation of Planning Commissioner Maria Mulvihill Planning Commissioner Maria Mulvihill has relocated to Hinkley, MN and has submitted her resignation from the Commission. Maria served since August, 2018, first on the Board of Appeals and Adjustments and n the Planning Commission as an alternate, and then as a regular Planning Commissioner since January of this year. Staff recommends Council approve the resignation of Planning Commissioner Maria Mulvihill effective immediately. G.4 Approve Resignation of Planning Commissioner David Fry Planning Commissioner David Fry has relocated to the Mahtomedi, MN and has submitted his resignation from the Commission. David has served on the Commission since being appointed in August, 2018. Staff recommends Council approve the resignation of David Fry from the Planning Commission effective immediately. G.4 Approve Scott Arcand as an Interim Planning Commissioner Scott Arcand had served on the Planning Commission from July, 2009, to December, 2021. He currently serves as an alternate on the Board of Zoning Adjustments since being appointed in January of this year. With the resignation of Kim Luchsinger in February and the recent resignation of Commissioners Mulvihill and Fry, Scott has agreed to serve in the interim until regular members are appointed. Staff recommends Council appoint Scott Arcand to serve as an Interim Planning Commissioner. G.6 Approve Advertisement for Commissioners On the Planning Commission, there are now three vacancies in the regular member positions and one vacancy in the alternate position. In addition, there is vacancy on the Parks Commission as alternate and three vacancies on the Historical Commission. Staff recommends Council approve the advertisement for commissioners. G.7 Approve Reimbursement of Costs for Expert Services Related to DNR Groundwater Model Following Judge Marrinan’s order concerning the White Bear Lake Level matter, the DNR revised the appropriation permits for a number of cities and other entities. The affected cities appealed the permit amendments. The appeals are being scheduled for hearings before an administrative law judge. Lawyers representing various cities have advised that an expert be retained to review and test the DNR’s groundwater model. Depending on how many cities participate, the total cost could amount to several thousand dollars. The City Attorney is recommending Council authorize the expert services. G.8 Approve Auto-Aid Agreement Between the City of Hugo and Centennial Fire District Fire Chief Jim Compton, Jr., is requesting approval to enter into an Automatic Mutual Aid Agreement between the City of Hugo and the Centennial Fire District to make equipment, personnel and other resources available to their respective fire departments. Each party may authorize the other party to provide assistance. Also, if either party receives notice of a reported structure or building fire within the coverage areas of the other Party, that party will automatically dispatch assistance to the scene without waiting for a request for assistance from the other party. The automatic dispatch may include an engine, crew, and a chief officer, if he or she is available. Staff recommends Council approve the Reciprocal Emergency Services Agreement between the City of Hugo and the Centennial Fire District. G.9 Approve Resolution Approving Site Plan for Oneka Elementary The White Bear Lake School District is seeking site plan approval of an approximately 10,000 square foot addition to the existing Oneka Elementary School located at 4888 Heritage Parkway North. At its April 28, 2022, meeting the Planning Commission considered the request. They agreed that the request met the ordinance standards to approve the site plan. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the resolution approving the site plan to the City Council. G.10 Approve Encroachment Agreement for 13123 Fondant Trail North - Rogers Benjamin and Michelle Rogers have requested an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 13123 Fondant Trail North. The Senior Engineering Technician has reviewed the location of the fence and is comfortable with the request. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends that the City Council approve the resolution approving the encroachment agreement for the property located at 13123 Fondant Trail North. G.11 Approve Encroachment Agreement for 13397 Fondant Trail North - Venerzzo Kevin and Rachael Venerzzo have requested an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 13397 Fondant Trail North. The Senior Engineering Technician has reviewed the location of the fence and is comfortable with the request. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends that the City Council approve the resolution approving the encroachment agreement for the property located at 13397 Fondant Trail North. G.12 Approve Encroachment Agreement for 13455 Fondant Trail North - Schneider Justin and Shannon Schneider have requested an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 13455 Fondant Trail North. The Senior Engineering Technician has reviewed the location of the fence and is comfortable with the request. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends that the City Council approve the resolution approving the encroachment agreement for the property located at 13455 Fondant Trail North. G.13 Approve Pay Request No. 9 for Schreiber Mullaney for Lions Park Building Schreiber Mullaney has submitted Pay Request No. 9 for the new Pavilion in Lions Park in the amount of $337,308.90. The quantities completed to date have been reviewed and agreed upon by the architect, contractor and city staff. The amount indicated above reflects the work certified through April 25, 2022 with a 5% retainage applied. The total retainage being held to date will be $148,505.08. Staff recommends Council approve payment in the amount of $337,308.90 to Schreiber Mullaney Construction for the construction of the City of Hugo Lions Park Pavilion. G.14 Approve Donation of Land on Education Drive and Falcon Circle from Barbara N Hanson Trust Barbara N Hanson is requesting to donate a lot in the Waters Edge Subdivision to the City of Hugo. This property is owned by the Barbara N Hanson Trust. The lot is .17 acres in size and located on the southeast corner of Education Drive and Falcon Circle. Staff has no immediate plans for the property. Staff recommends Council approve the donation of land located in Waters Edge from Barbara N Hanson. I.1 Approve Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for the Oneka Parkway Project At its February 7, 2022, meeting, Council had authorized staff to prepare plans and specifications for the 2022 Oneka Parkway Improvement Project. The 2022 Oneka Parkway Improvement Project consists of improvements along Oneka Parkway, construction of turn lanes, and installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Oneka Parkway and CSAH 8. Plans are prepared and ready to be advertised for bidding. Staff recommends Council approve the resolution approving the plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids. J.1 Review Premier Bank Sketch Plan Premier Bank is requesting informal comments on a sketch plan for a commercial development on a 0.76-acre parcel for a 4,368 square foot bank with a drive-through. The property is located on the northwest corner of 147th Street and Highway 61, currently occupied by a residential home. The property is zoned Future Central Business (FCB) and is located in the area of the City where development is guided by the downtown plan and design guidelines. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Central Business (C-1) to accommodate a commercial use. The applicant is also proposing a drive-through lane for the commercial business. The Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan at its April 28th meeting. Staff will provide information to the City Council on the request and an update from the Planning Commission at the meeting. M.1 City Administrator Performance Review on June 6, 2022 – Reminder The Council has scheduled the City Administrator’s performance review for June 6, 2022, at 6 p.m. The regular Council meeting will follow at 7 p.m. N. Adjournment Call to Order Mayor Weidt called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. COUNCIL PRESENT: Klein, Miron, Petryk, Strub, Weidt COUNCIL ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: City Administrator Bryan Bear, City Engineer Nick Guilliams, City Attorney Dave Snyder, Community Development Director Rachel Juba, City Clerk Michele Lindau April 18, 2022, City Council Meeting Klein made motion, Miron seconded, to approve the minutes for the City Council meeting held on April 18, 2022, as presented. All Ayes. Motion carried. Approval of Agenda Weidt made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the agenda as presented. All Ayes. Motion carried. Recognition of Retiring Legion Commander Greg Burmeister Greg Burmeister had been a member of the Hugo Legion for 50 years and the Legion Commander for the past seven years. Greg had announced his retirement and was turning over commander duties to a new commander this spring. Greg was asked to attend this meeting to receive a Certificate Appreciation in recognition of his contributions to the community. Hugo Yellow Ribbon Chair Chuck Haas thanked Greg for all he did to support military families. Hugo Legion General Manager Stacey Carlson said Greg had kept her grounded and said a lot of people don’t see what he does behind the scenes. Fire Chief Jim Compton, Jr. talked about Greg’s years on the fire department after being in the military saying he had been involved in the community all his life. Compton talked about the thousands of dollars that had been donated to the fire station under Greg’s leadership and said it was a privilege to serve under Greg when he was deputy chief on the Fire Department. Greg thanked his great staff at the Legion saying Stacey deserved as much credit. He said the biggest joy he had was the work he had done at the Legion supporting the community. He announced they had just signed a contract with Vanellis for a restaurant and catering that would hopefully be open by June. City Administrator Bryan Bear recognized the partnership the City had with the Legion. He said Greg made big decisions and kept the Legion doors open. He talked about Greg’s time Minutes HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HUGO CITY HALL MONDAY, MAY 2, 2022 – 7 P.M. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 2, 2022 Page 2 of 8 serving on the Hugo Planning Commission. Council members voiced their appreciation for the work Greg had done for the community. Mayor Weidt thanked Greg and presented him with a Certificate of Appreciation. Approval of Consent Agenda Petryk made motion, Strub seconded, to approve the following Consent Agenda: 1. Approve Claims Roster 2. Approve Annual Performance Review for Parks Planner Shayla Denaway 3. Approve Resolution Approving Minor Subdivision for 15595 Homestead Avenue North- Lutz 4. Approve Award of 2022 Dust Control Contract 5. Approve Resolution for No Parking on West Side of Farnham Avenue Between 149th St. and Oneka Parkway 6. Approve Resolution for No Parking along Oneka Parkway Between CSAH 8 and Heritage Parkway 7. Approve Ryan Nadeau as Training Lieutenant on the Hugo Fire Department 8. Approve Resignation of Firefighter Billy Lusk from the Hugo Fire Department 9. Approve Public Works Summer Seasonal Employees 10. Approve Special Event Permit for MS 150 on Sunday, June 12, 2022 11. Approve Special Event Permit for New Life Church Spring and Fall Events 12. Approve Special Event Permit for North Star Gay Rodeo July 30-31, 2022 13. Approve Temporary Liquor License for North Star Gay Rodeo July 30-31, 2022 14. Approve Resolution Approving Encroachment Agreement for 13474 Fondant Trail North – Brouse 15. Approve Resolution Approving Encroachment Agreement for 14237 Oneka Parkway - Aldana 16. Approve Donation of School Bus to the Hugo Fire Department All Ayes. Motion carried. Approve Claims Roster Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Claims Roster as presented. Approve Annual Performance Review for Parks Planner Shayla Denaway Shayla Denaway was hired on May 11, 2009, as the Economic Development/Parks Intern. On May 3, 2010, Council approved promoting Shayla as the new Parks Planner. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the annual performance review for Parks Planner Shayla Denaway Approve Resolution Approving Minor Subdivision for 15595 Homestead Avenue North- Lutz Vincent Lutz had requested approval of a minor subdivision to create two lots out of a 19.84- acre lot. The lots created would be two 9.92-acre parcels. At its April 14, 2022, meeting the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the request. There was no one that Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 2, 2022 Page 3 of 8 spoke during the public hearing except the applicant with background information on the request. Staff stated the application met the conditions to approve the request and recommended approval of the minor subdivision, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution. The Planning Commission agreed the application meet the criteria to approve a minor subdivision and unanimously recommended approval of the resolution to the City Council. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved RESOLUTION 2022-20 APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR VINCENT LUTZ FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 15595. Approve Award of 2022 Dust Control Contract Annually, the City of Hugo applied dust control to approximately 23 miles of gravel roads located within its municipal boundaries. The City’s 2022 General Budget had accounted for a dust control project in 2022. As in past years, staff would work with May Township to cost share for the application of dust control on the shared portion of Keystone Ave. north of County Road 4. Bids for dust control were received and opened on April 12, 2022. The following prices were received: Northern Salt Inc. - $1.22/gallon (1st application), $1.20/gallon (2nd application), Envirotech Services - $1.27/gallon (1st application), $1.27/gallon (2nd application). With City Council approval, staff would coordinate with Northern Salt to deliver and place a total of 142,811 gallons of calcium chloride in two separate applications, once in mid-June and again in mid-August. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the contract with Northern Salt Inc. in the amount of $172,924.84 for the 2022 Dust Control Project. Approve Resolution for No Parking on West Side of Farnham Avenue Between 149th St. and Oneka Parkway Staff had recently received a request from the Waters Edge Courtyard Home Association to prohibit parking on the west side of Farnham Avenue North from 149th Street North to Oneka Parkway North. The concern was that that the road was too narrow to allow for parking on both sides of the roadway while still allowing traffic in both directions. Access to private roads and mailbox accessibility was also raised. Farnham Avenue North was currently 35 feet wide as measured from back-of-curb to back-of-curb. Based on MnDOT design guidelines for roadways with on street parking, the existing road width would allow for parking on one side of the road while still maintaining traffic in both directions. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approve RESOLUTION 2022-21 RESTRICTING PARKING ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF FARNHAM AVENUE NORTH FROM 149TH STREET NORTH TO ONEKA PARKWAY NORTH. Approve Resolution for No Parking along Oneka Parkway Between CSAH 8 and Heritage Parkway Oneka Parkway had been designated as a Municipal State Aid (MSA) roadway and would be required to be constructed to meet the design requirements set forth by MnDOT as the City would be expending MSA funds for the project. Staff requested approval to restrict parking along both sides Oneka Parkway from Frenchman Road (CSAH 8) to Heritage Parkway as the proposed pavement widths did not provide adequate width for parking on both sides of the street. Prior to this project, parking was prohibited on Oneka Parkway between Frenchman Road (CSAH 8) and Heritage Parkway. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved RESOLUTION 2022- 22 RESTRICTING PARKING ALONG ONEKA PARKWAY FROM FRENCHMAN ROAD (CSAH 8) TO HEIRTAGE PARKWAY FOR THE 2022 ONEKA PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 2, 2022 Page 4 of 8 Approve Ryan Nadeau as Training Lieutenant on the Hugo Fire Department The training lieutenant position was vacated when Jason Palmquist was promoted to the training captain. The three chiefs had interviewed four firefighters interested in the open lieutenant position and selected Ryan Nadeau for the training lieutenant position effective May 1st 2022. Ryan would no longer be an engineer on the fire department. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved Ryan Nadeau as the new Training Lieutenant on the Hugo Fire Department. Approve Resignation of Firefighter Billy Lusk from the Hugo Fire Department Firefighter Billy Lusk had submitted his letter of resignation from the department due conflicts with his new employment. Billy had been on the department since August of 2018. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the letter of resignation from Billy Lusk effective immediately. Approve Public Works Summer Seasonal Employees Staff had requested Council approval to hire seasonal employees for the public works department. In the 2022 General Fund Budget, Council approved funding for five seasonal employee positions. There were two seasonal workers, Martin Jorgenson and Russ Pastorious, who would be returning from last year. Staff had interviewed new potential hires and recommended approval of two new seasonal employees. Staff was still searching for additional applicants and would be coming forward with another request at a later time. Seasonal Public Works Employees assist with mowing, garbage/litter removal, park maintenance, boulevard maintenance and general public works maintenance. Staff recommended hiring the following: Martin Jorgenson (return), Russ Pastorius (return), Madison Siebenaler (new), Jacob Orthaus (new). Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the hiring of seasonal employees. Approve Special Event Permit for MS 150 on Sunday, June 12, 2022 The MS Society had submitted an application for a Special Event Permit for the MS 150 to be held on Sunday, June 12, 2022. This required a SEP because there would be approximately 1,800 riders on the bike trail and streets in Hugo. This two-day ride would begin in Proctor, MN, have an overnight stay in Hinkley, then would travel through Hugo to end in White Bear Lake. This was a fundraising event for Multiple sclerosis, and had been held every year since 1980. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the special event permit for the MS150. Approve Special Event Permit for New Life Church Spring and Fall Events New Life Church, 6000 148th Street North, had applied for a Special Event Permit to hold an outdoor service and picnic on June 12, 2022, and a Fall Festival on September 25, 2022. These events required a SEP because there would be amplified sound for the service and picnic games on June 12, and music at their September 25 event. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the SEP for New Life Church’s Spring and Fall events as outlined in their applications. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 2, 2022 Page 5 of 8 Approve Special Event Permit for North Star Gay Rodeo The North Star Gay Rodeo had applied for a Special Event Permit to hold a rodeo at the Dead Broke Arena site at 5676 170th Street North on July 30-31, 2022. A SEP was required because there would be amplified sound and alcohol served outside. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the SEP for the North Star Gay Rodeo as outlined in their application. Approve Temporary Liquor License for the North Star Gay Rodeo North Star Gay Rodeo had applied for a Temporary Liquor License to serve beer and seltzer at their rodeo event on July 30-31, 2022. Staff had received completed payment, fee, and proof of liquor liability insurance. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Temporary Liquor License for the North Star Gay Rodeo. Approve Resolution Approving Encroachment Agreement for 13474 Fondant Trail North – Brouse Michele Brouse had requested an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 13474 Fondant Trail North. The Senior Engineering Technician had reviewed the location of the fence and was comfortable with the request. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved RESOLUTION 2022-23 APPROVING AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR MICHELE BROUSE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A FENCE WITHIN A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13474 FONDANT TRAIL NORTH. Approve Resolution Approving Encroachment Agreement for 14237 Oneka Parkway - Aldana Jonathan Aldana had requested an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 14237 Oneka Parkway North. The Senior Engineering Technician had reviewed the location of the fence and was comfortable with the request. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved RESOLUTION 2022-24 APPROVING AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR JONATHAN ALDANA TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A FENCE WITHIN A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 14237 ONEKA PARKWAY NORTH. Approve Donation of School Bus to the Hugo Fire Department First Student Bus Company requested to donate a used school bus to the Hugo Fire Department. The department would use the bus to train on auto extrications. The department would pay $100 to have the bus towed from Champlin to the City of Hugo. Following the training, a private company from Wisconsin will pick up the bus to scrap and pay the department $500 for the scrap material. Donations to the Fire Department must be approved by the Council. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the donation of the school bus from First Student Bus Company and recycling of the bus for scrap value. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 2, 2022 Page 6 of 8 Award of Bid for 140th Street Extension Project City Engineer Nick Guilliams showed the location of the 140th Street extension project located in front of Schwieters Company Building No. 7. Improvements would include extension of the roadway and new watermain and storm sewer. On Tuesday, April 22, 2022, bids were opened. Seven bids were received ranging from $404,333.33 to $515,936.93 with the Engineer’s estimate total being $439,979. Nick explained the funding for street and storm sewer was split 50/50 with the developer. The developer would pay for the watermain and the City would pay for oversizing. The developer had signed a five-year assessment which waived the formal 429 process. If the plans were approved this evening, staff would advertise for bids and award the contract at the May 2, 2022, Council meeting. Staff had recommended Council approve the award of Contract to the low bidder, Miller Excavating, Inc., in the amount of $404,333.33. Miron made motion, Klein seconded, to approve RESOLUTION 2022-25 A RESOLUTION RECEIVING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE 140TH STREET EXTENSION PROJECT. All Ayes. Motion carried. Update on Hopkins Schoolhouse Meeting Held April 23, 2022 A meeting was held on Saturday, April 23, 2022, at Hugo City Hall to gather those who may be interested in saving the Hopkins Schoolhouse from demolition. In attendance were Mayor Weidt, City Administrator Bryan Bear, and City Clerk Michele Lindau. City Administrator Bryan Bear updated the Council saying there were approximately 22 people that had attended. The meeting began in the Council chambers where the Mayor explained it was Council’s desire to have the community come up with a plan or the building would face demolition. Lindau then reviewed all that had been done over the years to pursue the restoration of the building. Those interested were instructed to meet in the Oneka Room to form the group. Bear explained the group did not have any representative from the City, but the City would support the group in finding meeting space. Discussion on Proposed North Star Wetland Bank Parks Planner Shayla Denaway provided background on proposed wetland banking on City owned property and property owned by the new North Star Elementary School. She began by explaining the Council had authorized a study of a series of trails in partnership with the school district on property owned by the City and property owned by the new North Star Elementary. The study identified a trail route between the Hardwood Creek trail and existing trails on the school site that would connect to Oneka Parkway Trail. She showed some optional trail segments that would require the use of boardwalks. The total to construct all trails would be between $2.8 and $3.6 million. At their meeting of April 20, 2022, the Parks Commission had discussed wetland banking and trail construction and listened to a proposal by WSB to restore the partially drained wetlands and construct upland buffers with trails. Tony Havranek from WSB explained the area qualify for wetland bank credits. The Parks Commission recommended that the first steps in evaluating the project be taken, as outlined by WSB, if the White Bear Lake School District was interested in a continued partnership. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 2, 2022 Page 7 of 8 Rebecca Haug from WSB talked about wetland banking saying it was part of the Clean Water Act Program to achieve a no-net loss. She reviewed rules of MN wetland banking as overseen by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources. She explained wetland banking is based on market demand and the cost is negotiable. She showed the ten Wetland Bank Service Area saying Hugo was in Service Area Number 7. She talked about the formula for selling credits. Credits must be purchased in the same watershed as the affected wetland. She talked about a proposed North Star Wetland Bank explaining there was a potential of 51.67 acres of credits. Banks retore native vegetation, and there is a new state program that allowed plants to be removed and replanted in the banks. It also creates educational opportunities and recreational space. She said it would be a great financial incentive as a non-tax revenue source, and funding could be used in any way the City decided. She talked about the City of Blaine’s program with their revenue being used mostly on economic development and funding of trails and open space. Rebecca explained the return on investment is 3-5 years. At the current market rate, 51.67 acres would be a net $4.2 million. The estimated total cost would be $970,000 with the biggest cost being construction at $815,000. She explained it would be a three-year process, and the next steps would be to work with the school district and do hydrology and vegetation monitoring. Based on that data, a draft prospectus would be completed. WSB estimated it would cost $14,500 the first year. The following year would cost an estimated $120,000 for submittal of the Wetland Banking Plan and Mitigation Banking Instrument. Meetings would be held with the public and stakeholders, and a perpetual conservation easement would be established over the project area. The work would be done the third year and likely be a winter project. After release, 15% of the credit would be available. Depending on performance, all of it should be available after five years. Maintenance would need to be done at an estimated cost of $820,000. She said there were grant opportunities through LCCMR and Safe Routes to School. Petryk asked if the City needed to bond to ensure there would be on-going maintenance. Haug said, as part of the plan, the bank would be stopped if not maintained. Klein asked who would own the property after the credits were sold, and he asked about draining the wetland. Haug responded that the ownership would not change, and Bear responded that the drainage would fit into the City’s wetland plan. Strub made motion, Miron seconded, proceeded allocating funds for Phase 1 at an estimated cost of $14,500. All Ayes. Motion carried. Schedule Annual Performance Review for City Administrator Bryan Bear Bryan Bear has been employed with the City since May 3, 2004, and served as the Community Development Director until being appointed as the City Administrator on November, 7, 2011. Staff requested Council schedule the annual performance review for City Administrator Bryan Bear. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 2, 2022 Page 8 of 8 Miron made motion, Klein seconded, to schedule the annual performance review for June 6, 2022, at 6 p.m. All Ayes. Motion carried. League of MN Cities Annual Conference in June 22-24, 2022 The League of MN Cities will hold their annual conference in Duluth on June 22-24, 2022. Staff recommended Council schedule as a meeting if they wish to attend. Weidt made motion, Miron seconded, to schedule a meeting to attend the LMC Annual Conference June 22-24. All Ayes. Motion carried. Adjournment Klein made motion, Petryk seconded, to adjourn at 8:08 p.m. All Ayes. Motion carried. Respectfully Submitted, Michele Lindau, City Clerk OPERATIONAL REPORT OPERATING PERIOD: YEARS END 2021 CITY OF HUGO M Health Fairview EMS Overall 911 Responses Reporting Period: DECEMBER 20 – DECEMBER 2 1 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021 Requests 343 384 305 330 389 436 451 431 433 439 429 468 418 4913 Cancels (did not arrive on scene)22 33 16 13 23 17 35 27 19 23 20 44 22 292 Mutual Aid - Rcvd 16 13 5 6 13 15 18 35 20 39 25 47 28 264 Mutual Aid - Gvn 6 18 9 15 12 32 19 28 42 24 43 38 32 312 Scene responses 321 351 289 317 366 387 397 376 372 392 366 386 364 4363 Emergent transports 21 25 15 11 21 17 28 27 19 22 18 32 21 256 Non-transports 48 57 51 59 55 70 71 64 75 69 59 66 52 748 Alpha 75 79 75 70 92 104 76 87 84 108 88 106 99 1068 Bravo 38 52 17 38 58 47 61 43 46 24 35 32 16 469 Charlie 134 151 153 153 171 181 216 203 198 211 189 231 194 2251 Delta 70 66 38 48 41 48 41 36 41 42 45 5 49 500 Echo 4 3 6 8 4 7 3 7 3 7 9 12 6 75 Omega 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Average MHF-EMS – Emergent 7:21 7:06 7:15 6:52 6:32 7:33 7:36 7:43 7:54 7:10 7:34 7:54 7:46 7:24 MHF-EMS - Combined 7:45 7:57 7:48 7:28 7:19 8:07 8:08 8:07 8:20 7:57 8:09 8:17 8:19 7:59 HUGO Overall 911 Responses Reporting Period: DECEMBER 20 – DECEMBER 2 1 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 2021 Requests 55 64 72 57 82 87 91 69 90 84 62 83 74 915 Cancels (did not arrive on scene)1 1 0 0 3 3 7 1 1 3 2 4 4 29 Mutual Aid - Rcvd 3 0 0 2 3 3 8 4 3 7 2 7 3 42 Scene responses 54 63 72 57 79 81 76 64 86 74 58 72 67 849 Emergent transports 1 2 0 0 3 3 1 1 3 2 4 4 23 Non-transports 5 14 15 12 14 22 10 10 23 13 10 11 15 169 Alpha 5 9 18 10 18 16 9 11 15 12 11 20 18 167 Bravo 7 4 4 5 14 12 13 7 1 6 4 2 0 72 Charlie 28 42 41 32 41 41 47 40 64 49 35 42 42 516 Delta 13 8 9 9 6 9 6 6 6 6 7 5 7 84 Echo 1 0 0 1 0 3 1 0 0 1 1 3 0 10 Omega 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Average / Fractile Hugo – Emergent 6:42 6:19 7:09 6:41 6:26 7:41 7:28 6:58 7:21 8:29 6:18 7:52 8:13 7:14 Hugo - Combined 7:03 6:47 7:18 6:55 6:56 7:46 7:45 7:33 7:37 8:42 6:57 8:05 8:27 7:34 1 RECIPROCAL EMERGENCY SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUGO AND THE CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT In an effort to provide the best possible emergency services and automatic response to reported structure and building fires for residents, the Centennial Fire District and the City of Hugo have entered into this Reciprocal Emergency Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) to make equipment, personnel and other resources available to their respective fire departments. In this Agreement, the following terms shall have meanings given below: 1. “Party” means the City of Hugo through its Fire Department or the Centennial Fire District through its Fire Department. 2. “Requesting Official” means the person designated by a Party who is responsible for requesting Assistance from the other Party. 3. “Requesting Party,” means a Party that requests assistance from the other Party. 4. “Responding Official” means a Party that provides assistance to a Requesting Party. 5. “Assistance” means fire/rescue and/or emergency medical services personnel and equipment. ____________________________________________________________________________________ 1. Request for Assistance. Whenever, in the opinion of a Requesting Official, there is a need for assistance from the other Party, the Requesting Official may call upon the Responding Official of the other Party to furnish assistance. 2. Response to Request. Upon the request of assistance from a Requesting Party, the Responding Official may authorize and direct his or her Party’s personnel to provide assistance to the Requesting Party. This decision will be made after considering the needs of the Responding Party and the availability of resources. 3. Automatic Assistance. If either Party receives notice of a reported structure or building fire within the coverage areas of the other Party, that Party will automatically dispatch assistance to the scene without waiting for a request for assistance from the other Party. The automatic dispatch may include an engine, crew, and a chief officer, if he or she is available. 4. Recall of Assistance. The Responding Official may at any time recall such assistance if, based on his or her best judgment or on order from the governing body of the Responding Party, it is considered to be in the best interests of the Responding Party to do so. 2 5. Command of Scene. The first arriving Party will establish command. Subsequently, command may be transferred as mutually agreed. 6. Workers Compensation. Each Party shall be responsible for injuries or death of its own personnel. Each Party will maintain workers’ compensation insurance or self-insurance coverage, covering its own personnel while they are providing assistance pursuant to this Agreement. Each Party waives the right to sue the other Party for any workers’ compensation benefits paid to its own employees or their dependents, even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of the other Party or its officers or employees. Each Party’s employees shall be considered employees of that Party and not of the other Party. 7. Damage to Equipment. Each Party shall be responsible for damages to or loss of its own equipment. Each Party waives the right to sue the other Party for any damages to or loss of its equipment, even if the damages or losses were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of the other Party or its officers, employees or volunteers. 8. Liability. The Requesting Party agrees to defend and indemnify the Responding Party against any claims brought or actions filed against the Responding Party or any officer or employee, of the Responding Party for injury to, death of, or damage to the property of any third person or persons, arising from the performance and provision of assistance in responding to a request for assistance by the Responding Party pursuant to this Agreement. In the case in which automatic assistance is provided, each Party shall be responsible for any claims or actions filed against its own officers or employees, arising from the performance and provision of assistance pursuant to this Agreement. Under no circumstances, however, shall a Party be required to pay on behalf of itself and the other Party, any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 applicable to any one Party. The limits of liability for both of the Parties may not be added together to determine the maximum amount of liability for one Party. Neither Party waives any immunities or limits on liability it enjoys under Minnesota Statutes or common law The intent of this subdivision is to impose on each Requesting Party a limited duty to defend and indemnify a Responding Party for claims arising within the Requesting Party’s jurisdiction. The purpose of creating this duty to defend and indemnify is to simplify the defense of claims by eliminating conflicts among defendants, and to permit liability claims against multiple defendants from a single occurrence to be defended by a single attorney. Neither Party to this Agreement nor any officer of either Party shall be liable to the other Party or to any other person for failure of either Party to furnish assistance to the other Party, or for recalling assistance, both as described in this Agreement. 3 9. Charges. A. No charges will be levied by a Responding Party to this Agreement for assistance rendered to a Requesting Party under the terms of this Agreement unless that assistance continues for a period of more than 12 hours. If assistance provided under this Agreement continues for more than 12, hours, the Responding Party will submit to the Requesting Party a bill for the cost of any assistance provided after the initial 12-hour period, according to the rate schedule as established by the Capital City Mutual Aid Association fee schedule. Such charges are not contingent upon the availability of federal or state government funds. B. If automatic assistance to a reported building or structure fire in the coverage areas of this Agreement is rendered, each Party will be responsible for its own costs of responding to that fire. 10. Duration. This Agreement will be in force from the date of execution by the second Party until either Party withdraws from this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other Party to the Agreement. 11. Execution. Each party hereto has read, agreed to and executed this Reciprocal Emergency Services Agreement on the date indicated. Each Party to this Agreement shall maintain an executed copy of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, have executed this Agreement on behalf of the respective Parties. Centennial Fire District By _______________________________________, its Chair Date____________________ By _______________________________________, its City Administrator Date_______________ By _______________________________________, its City Administrator Date_______________ City of Hugo By _______________________________________, its Mayor Date____________________ By________________________________________, its City Manager Date____________________ Agenda Number CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Emily Weber, Community Development Assistant SUBJECT: White Bear Lake School District Site plan request to allow an addition on the existing Oneka Elementary School located at 4888 Heritage Parkway North. DATE: May 12, 2022 for the City Council Meeting of May 16, 2022 ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD) 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: May 28, 2022 1.PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE: At its April 28, 2022, meeting the Planning Commission considered the request. They agreed that the request meet the ordinance standards to approve the site plan. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the resolution approving the site plan to the City Council. 2.DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is seeking approval of an approximately 10,000 square foot addition to the existing Oneka Elementary School located at 4888 Heritage Parkway North. 3.CONTEXT: A.Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The properties to the north, west, east, and south are zoned PUD and are part of the Waters Edge residential development. The underlying land use is Public/Quasi-Public. G.9 Oneka Elementary School Addition Page 2 B. Natural Characteristics of Site The site is 22.8 acres, however, in total the White Bear Lake School District owns approximately 40 acres where the school is located. The property consists of the existing elementary school and associated fields and parking. The property has a significant amount of wetlands on site. 4. ANALYSIS: A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Site Plan Elementary School The existing elementary school received City approval in 2004. The site consists of the elementary school and community gymnasium. The applicant is proposing an approximately 10,000 square foot addition that includes adding five classrooms to the school. The additional classrooms will create a total building capacity of 720 students. The applicant is also planning on interior renovation of the school’s media center and surrounding area to create a ‘learning commons.’ Setbacks All setback requirements have been met with this application. Streets and Access The existing site has access from Heritage Parkway and Oneka Parkway. The site has sufficient access and the proposed addition does not require additional access. Parking The City ordinances require 1 space per classroom plus 1 parking space for each 100 students. The existing site has two parking lots totaling 142 parking spaces and the applicant is proposing an additional 6 parking spaces, totaling 148 parking spaces and meeting the ordinance requirements. The applicant is also showing 14 additional parking spaces to be added in the future based on parking demands. Staff is comfortable with this proposal. In addition, there is an additional 25 paces located off of Europa Avenue for the field space to the west. Oneka Elementary School Addition Page 3 Sidewalks/Trails There are existing sidewalks and trails throughout the site that connect the building and parking lots to the public sidewalk system along Heritage Parkway and Oneka Parkway. The proposed addition will disrupt a small portion of sidewalk along the south side of the building, which will be reconstructed to wrap around the addition. Landscaping The landscape plan exceeds the ordinance requirements. The applicant has existing landscaping on site and is proposing an additional 18 trees be planted around the proposed addition and sidewalk system. Building Materials The addition is proposed to be constructed primarily of brick to match the existing materials on site. The applicant has also proposed a pitched roof line to match the existing architectural elements on site. Staff finds that the proposed building materials are of high quality. The applicant has not submitted a material sample board. Staff approval of a material sample board is required prior to issuance of a building material to ensure materials and colors will be cohesive throughout the building. Signage Signage is not being proposed with this addition. Any future signage will be reviewed and approved by the staff at a later date, but is subject to ordinance requirements. Grading/Drainage The applicant is proposing grading around the building addition that will blend into the surrounding topography. Additional grading is proposed along the parking lot addition on the north side of the site. The applicant is proposing a biofiltration basin to meet the rate control and water quality requirements for the additional proposed impervious surface on site. Comments on the drainage design have been provided to the applicant and all redlined comments shall be addressed prior to the issuance of a building permit. Wetlands The applicant is proposing to impact approximately 10,800 square feet of wetlands. The applicant has applied for a wetland sequencing and replacement plan and must receive approval from the Technical Evaluation Panel prior to issuance of a building permit. Oneka Elementary School Addition Page 4 Utilities The existing building is connected to City sewer and water, however, the applicant is proposing to reroute the water service around the building addition and provide a new stub to service it. Additionally, the applicant is connecting to the existing sanitary sewer service by constructing a manhole. All water and sanitary service construction work will be outside of the City right of way and will take place on private property. C. Conclusion Staff has reviewed the site plan for consistency with the applicable standards outlined in the Comprehensive Land Use Regulations and finds that the application is consistent with the standards. 5. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the site plan request submitted by White Bear Lake School District to allow an addition on the existing Oneka Elementary School located at 4888 Heritage Parkway North. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Approving Resolution 3. Engineer Memo 4. Site Plan Submittal Oneka Par kway Nor t hHeritage Parkway North Elm Drive North Fairoaks Avenue North Education Drive NorthEvergreen Drive North Emmit Drive NorthFa lcon Circle NorthEducat i on Dr i ve Nor t hOneka Par kway Nor t h4888 Heritage Parkway Location Map Hugo, MN Site Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary ¯0 200Feet1 in = 200 feet Document Path: S:\Mapping\Emily\LocationSite Maps\2022\Oneka Elementary.mxdSite RESOLUTION 2022-XX APPROVING A SITE PLAN REQUEST FROM WHITE BEAR LAKE AREA SCHOOLS TO ALLOW AN ADDITION ON THE EXISTING ONEKA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LOCATED AT 4888 HERITAGE PARKWAY NORTH. WHEREAS, White Bear Lake Area Schools has requested site plan approval for an approximately 10,000 square foot addition to be constructed on to the existing elementary school on property located at 4888 Heritage Parkway North that is legally described as follows: See attached. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said site plan on April 28, 2022, and recommends approval subject to the conditions listed in this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the site plan for White Bear Lake Area Schools with the following findings: 1. A site plan is approved to allow construction of an approximately 10,000 square foot square foot addition with the plans dated March 4, 2022. 2. The applicant shall obtain all necessary local, state, and federal permits. Prior to Building Permit Approval: 3. All items on the Engineer’s memo and “red-line” detailed engineering comments that have been sent directly to the applicant’s engineer dated April 22, 2022, shall be addressed. 4. The applicant shall receive TEP approval for all wetland impacts. 5. The applicant shall submit the final building material sample board to be reviewed and approved by staff. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 6. A final landscaping and lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff and all required landscaping shall be fully installed. 7. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated to the City over the stormwater management facilities and applicable utilities. 8. A maintenance agreement for the stormwater management facilities shall be recorded against the property. Resolution 2022-XX Page 2 ADOPTED by the City Council this 16th day of May 2022. _______________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk K:\020118-000\Admin\Docs\020118-000 LTR RJuba- Oneka Elementary School 2022-04-22.docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM April 22, 2022 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Site Plan Review Oneka Elementary School WSB Project No. 020118-000 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the site plan submittal for the Oneka Elementary School Addition site located west of Oneka Parkway and north of Heritage Parkway. In particular, we have reviewed the following plans related to this particular request:  Oneka Site Submittal (2022.3.4 - Oneka ES City Submittal.pdf) dated 3/4/2022 by Larson Engineering and Wold Architects and Engineers  Stormwater Report (22.03.23 Oneka Elementary School Stormwater Report.pdf) dated 3/23/2022 by Larson Engineering Based on the review of the above documents, we offer the following comments related to this application: Grading, Street, and Utility Plans 1. The site is not impacting either of their existing access points and only modifying their northern parking lot to provide an additional row of parking. 2. The applicant is constructing an addition on their building that conflicts with their existing looped water service. They will be rerouting the water service around the building addition and providing a new stub to service it. All construction for the rerouting and new water service connection will be outside the City right of way and on private property. 3. The sanitary service to the new addition will be provided by constructing a manhole and connecting to their existing sanitary sewer service. All construction for the sanitary sewer service connection will be outside the City right of way and on private property. 4. Grading is proposed adjacent to the building addition to blend into the surround existing topography. Additional grading is also proposed to accommodate drainage from the parking lot addition. 5. Detailed redline comments have been provided on the plans and sent to the applicants engineer so they can be addressed in future submittals. Ms. Rachel Juba April 22, 2022 Page 2 Stormwater Management 6. The site is proposing to treat the new and reconstructed impervious for the expansion with a biofiltration basin. Rate control and water quality requirements for the expansion are met through this biofiltration basin. 7. Infiltration is not possible due to clay soils onsite and water reuse was not proposed due to the minimal amount of treatment required. 8. The disturbance area should be noted on the plans to confirm whether a NPDES permit and SWPPP will be required. It is assumed the site disturbance is under one acre and does not require a SWPPP or NPDES permit. 9. Comments on the drainage design have been provided to applicant and will need to be addressed in future submittals for documentation and permitting purposes. Wetland 10. There are two (2) wetlands within the site. 11. Wetland 2, the easternmost wetland is proposed to be impacted by the construction of the school addition. 12. The total amount of impact for this project to wetland 2 is 0.2435 acres. 13. The applicant has proposed to replace impacts using wetland bank 1722 with 0.4870 acres of wetland credit. 14. The application is complete and a draft notice of decision approving the replacement and wetland sequencing has been completed. A memo to city council recommending approval has been drafted and will be provided to council for approval at the next meeting. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. Additional comments may be necessary following the review of the responses to these. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 612-419-3589. Sincerely, WSB Nick Guilliams, PE Senior Project Manager cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) Manhole 198rim=922.94inv=918.24Manhole 197rim=922.55inv=916.32Manhole 196rim=922.91inv=915.95Manhole 189rim=921.16inv=915.22Manhole 186rim=921.55inv (N,S)=912.89inv (E)=914.29Manhole 187rim=921.16inv=914.60Manhole 185rim=922.54inv=912.6248" RCP36" RCP15" RCP15" RCP24" RCP33" RCP24" RCP12" RCP12" HDPESanitary Manhole 15-2rim=922.74inv (NW, NE)=904.3410"inv (SW)=904.48"8" P V CManholerim=925.53Manholerim=925.34Manholerim=925.34TRENCH DRAIN8" HDPEONEKA ELEMENTARYFESinv=918.32inv = 920.25 (per plan)rim=921.76FESinv=918.1318" HDPECONNECT TO BLDG ROOF DRAINAT IE = 920.75(PER PLANS)RIP RAP EOF SPILLWAYelev. = 920.30CONTROL STRUCTURE (BURIED)-DATA PER PLANSrim = 922.00inv in = 918.50 (12" NE)inv out = 918.50 (12" SW)sump = 914.50inv=918.71CONNECT TO BLDG FOOTINGDRAIN AT IE = 921.00(PER PLANS)FESinv=919.52FESinv = 920.5012" HDPE (Per Plans)Watermain (as located)W a t e r m a i n ( a s l o c a t e d )Watermain (as located)Watermain per plans(not located)8" PVC S a n i t a r y s e w e r p e r p l a n s (not loca t e d )CONNECT TO BLDG@ inv = 918.00(PER PLANS)PSMH 3 (Per Plans, not located)rim=923.90inv in=915.06 (8" N)inv out=914.96 (EX. 8" S)FES (PER PLANS)inv=918.50FES (Per Plans)inv=920.50CONTROL STRUCTURE (BURIED)-DATA PER PLANSrim = 923.00inv in = 920.50 (12" E)inv out = 920.50 (12" W)sump = 916.50FESinv=920.13Watermain per plans(not located)Watermain per plans(not located)Watermain p e r p l a n s (not locate d )FES (Per Plans)8" HDPEPer Plansinv = 921.00FES (Per Plans)8" HDPE12" HDPEWW8" H D P E WWW8"inv=921.578"inv=919.838"inv=920.826"4"44441111122661777733333333999185993524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comC 2021 Larson Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.P:\Projects\Projects - 2021\12216147 - Oneka Elem Addition & Renovation - Wold\C. Design\Drawing Files\12216147 - C100 Demolition.dwg 3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comLarsonEngineering, Inc.0NORTH153060FEDCBA12345678MNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:Scale:Greg A. Buchal, P.E.Date: Lic. No.:I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the state of Minnesota.GABMTH03.04.202212216147RevisionsDescriptionDateNumNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION03.04.2022 SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL3/4/2022 8:56:12 AM INDEPENDENT SCHOOLDISTRICT #624Oneka ElementarySchool Addition andRenovation4855 Bloom AvenueWhite Bear Lake, MN 551104888 Heritage Pkwy NorthHugo, MN 55038REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUSPAVEMENT SECTION. AT CONTRACTOR OPTION,RECLAIM FOR USE AS BASE AGGREGATEREMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTINGCONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTIONREMOVE AND DISPOSE OF ALL UNDERBRUSH,TREES, AND ROOTSSYMBOL LEGENDDEMOLITION NOTES1.Verify all existing utility locations.2.It is the responsibility of the Contractors to perform or coordinate allnecessary utility demolitions and relocations from existing utility locationsto all onsite amenities and buildings. These connections include, but arenot limited to, water, sanitary sewer, cable tv, telephone, gas, electric, sitelighting, etc. Do not disturb active utilities until new or temporary servicesare in place.3.Prior to beginning work, contact Gopher State Onecall (651-454-0002) tolocate utilities throughout the area under construction. The Contractorsshall retain the services of a private utility locator to locate the privateutilities.4.Sawcut along edges of pavements, sidewalks, and curbs to remain.5.All construction shall be performed in accordance with state and localstandard specifications for construction.6.Remove and replace asphalt pavement as needed to properly install newcurb and gutter in areas of mill and overlay.C100DEMOLITIONPLANREMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT.REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT.REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING TREE, STUMP, AND ROOTS.REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING STORM SEWER UTILITY.REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING PAVERS. COORDINATE WITHOWNER.REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF CONCRETE CURB.REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING WATER MAIN.REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING SANITARY SEWER.REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING ELECTRICAL POLE, FOOTING, ANDANY OTHER RELATED INFRASTRUCTURE. COORDINATE WITHELECTRICAL.KEY NOTES123456789 ONEKA ELEMENTARYWWWWWNEW BUILDING ADDITIONFFE: 926.10 (ARCH 100' 00")14 ADDITIONAL FUTUREPARKING STALLS1142A2A3333118'(TYP.)9'(TYP.)12'10'8'8'8'8'8'6' 8'3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comC 2021 Larson Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.P:\Projects\Projects - 2021\12216147 - Oneka Elem Addition & Renovation - Wold\C. Design\Drawing Files\12216147 - C200 Paving.dwg 3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comLarsonEngineering, Inc.0NORTH153060FEDCBA12345678MNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:Scale:Greg A. Buchal, P.E.Date: Lic. No.:I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the state of Minnesota.GABMTH03.04.202212216147RevisionsDescriptionDateNumNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION03.04.2022 SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL3/4/2022 8:56:23 AM INDEPENDENT SCHOOLDISTRICT #624Oneka ElementarySchool Addition andRenovation4855 Bloom AvenueWhite Bear Lake, MN 551104888 Heritage Pkwy NorthHugo, MN 55038C200PAVING PLANSYMBOL LEGENDNEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSEE DETAIL 1/C600NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENTSEE DETAIL 2/C200NEW STOOPSEE STRUCTURALPAVEMENT MARKINGSNO PARKINGKEY NOTES1NEW S518 CONCRETE CURB, SEE DETAIL 8/C600NEW ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP_A:TYPE 1, SEE DETAIL 9/C600TRANSITION CURBNEW CURB CUT, SEE DETAIL 3/C6002_3EXISTING WETLAND EDGENEW WETLAND EDGEPROPOSED TREEPAVING NOTES1.Concrete joints are shown for general reference only to signify newlight-duty and/or heavy-duty concrete pavement. Actual joints shall beconstructed per the project specifications.4 Manholerim=925.53Manholerim=925.34Manholerim=925.34ONEKA ELEMENTARYWatermain (as located)W a t e r m a i n ( a s l o c a t e d )Watermain (as located)Watermain per plans(not located)Watermain p e r p l a n s (not locate d )ONEKA PARKWAY NWWDrainage & Utility Easement per plat of WATERS EDGEDrainage & Utility Easement per plat of WATERS EDGEPonding & Flowage Easement over all of Drainage &Utility Easement of Outlot A, WATERS EDGE per Doc.No. 596408 & 3482732Ponding & Flowage Easement over all of Drainage &Utility Easement of Outlot A, WATERS EDGE per Doc.No. 596408 & 3482732WWW921 922 923 920921922928926924922922924922922 924 9249229249 2 4 924921922922920W E T L A N D TBOTTOM = 917.00PERMANENT POOL = 920.50100 YR HWL = 921.60EOF = 922.30MEASURED ELEV. 11/03/21 = 920.78MEASURED ELEV. 02/21/22 = 920.44(ICE)P O N D 4BOTTOM = 915.00PERMANENT POOL = 918.50100 YR HWL = 920.30MEASURED ELEV. 11/03/21 = 919.11MEASURED ELEV. 02/21/22 = 918.37(ICE)P O N D 3Wetland Delineationper Kjolhaug Environmental Services Inc.Nov. 2021(typical)NEW BUILDING ADDITIONFFE: 926.10 (ARCH 100' 00")920925925 920.58 924.29 TC*923.87 GL*923.88 GL/TC924.07 TC923.65 GL923.75 GL/TC923.82 C924.36 C*922.80 G926.10 FFE926.10 FFE924.30 C*924.40 C*925.93 C925.81 C924.80 C925.20 C925.55 C924.68 C925.08 C925.43 C925.84 C925.94 C925.72 C925.96 C925.86 C925.12 C925.00 C925.25 C925.13 C926.10 FFE925.98 C925.91 C925.73 C924.80 C*924.60 C*925.49 C925.00 C924.88 C924.21 C*924.18 C*924.82 C924.70 C924.92 C925.04 C925.01 C925.13 C925.89 C925.77 C921922923924924 923 922 921 925.37 C923.10 CC923.80 TC*923.38 GL*923.42 GL/TC923.25 GL/TC923.92 C923.34 C1.5%1.5%1.5%1.5%1.5%1.5%1.5%1.5 % 924 923 922 921 923 922 3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comC 2021 Larson Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.P:\Projects\Projects - 2021\12216147 - Oneka Elem Addition & Renovation - Wold\C. Design\Drawing Files\12216147 - C300 Grading.dwg 3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comLarsonEngineering, Inc.0NORTH153060FEDCBA12345678MNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:Scale:Greg A. Buchal, P.E.Date: Lic. No.:I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the state of Minnesota.GABMTH03.04.202212216147RevisionsDescriptionDateNumNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION03.04.2022 SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL3/4/2022 8:56:32 AM INDEPENDENT SCHOOLDISTRICT #624Oneka ElementarySchool Addition andRenovation4855 Bloom AvenueWhite Bear Lake, MN 551104888 Heritage Pkwy NorthHugo, MN 55038PROPOSED CONTOURS - MAJOR INTERVALGRADE BREAK LINEPROPOSED CONTOURS - MINOR INTERVAL949950950EXISTING CONTOURS2.0%GRADE SLOPELEGENDGRADING NOTES1.Tree protection consisting of snow fence or safety fence installed at the drip lineshall be in place prior to beginning any grading or demolition work at the site.2.All elevations with an asterisk (*) shall be field verified. If elevations varysignificantly, notify the Engineer for further instructions.3.Grades shown in paved areas represent finish elevation.4.Restore all disturbed turf areas with 6" of good quality topsoil and sod, unless notedotherwise.5.All construction shall be performed in accordance with state and local standardspecifications for construction.C300GRADINGPLAN950.00 TC949.50 GLSPOT ABBREVIATIONS:TC - TOP OF CURBGL - GUTTER LINEB - BITUMINOUSC - CONCRETETW - TOP OF WALLBW - BOTTOM OF WALL (F/G)TS- TOP STEPBS - BOTTOM STEPG - GRADEFFE - FINISH FLOOR ELEVATIONEOF - EMERGENCY OVERFLOW(*) - EXISTING TO BE VERIFIEDNWLNWLEXISTING WETLAND EDGENEW WETLAND EDGEIMPACTED WETLANDWETLAND NOTES1.November 2021 the wetland delineation and report was provided by KjolhaugEnironmental Services Inc.2.The shown Impacted Wetland Area = 10,818 SF NEW BUILDING ADDITIONFFE: 926.10 (ARCH 100' 00")ONEKA ELEMENTARYONEKA PARKWAY NWWDrainage & Utility Easement per plat of WATERS EDGEDrainage & Utility Easement per plat of WATERS EDGEPonding & Flowage Easement over all of Drainage &Utility Easement of Outlot A, WATERS EDGE per Doc.No. 596408 & 3482732Ponding & Flowage Easement over all of Drainage &Utility Easement of Outlot A, WATERS EDGE per Doc.No. 596408 & 3482732WWW921 922 923 920921922928926924922922924922922 924 9249229249 2 4 924921922922920W E T L A N D TBOTTOM = 917.00PERMANENT POOL = 920.50100 YR HWL = 921.60EOF = 922.30MEASURED ELEV. 11/03/21 = 920.78MEASURED ELEV. 02/21/22 = 920.44(ICE)P O N D 4BOTTOM = 915.00PERMANENT POOL = 918.50100 YR HWL = 920.30MEASURED ELEV. 11/03/21 = 919.11MEASURED ELEV. 02/21/22 = 918.37(ICE)P O N D 3Wetland Delineationper Kjolhaug Environmental Services Inc.Nov. 2021(typical)920925925 920.58 INLET PROTECTION(TYP.)ROCK CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE (TYP.)DOUBLE SILT FENCEADJACENT TO WETLANDBIO ROLL (TYP.)RIP RAP AT OUTLET(TYP.)RIP RAP AT OUTLET(TYP.)921922923924924 923 922 921 924 923 922 921 923 922 BIO ROLL (TYP.)BIO ROLL (TYP.)3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comC 2021 Larson Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.P:\Projects\Projects - 2021\12216147 - Oneka Elem Addition & Renovation - Wold\C. Design\Drawing Files\12216147 - C400 Erosion Control.dwg 3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comLarsonEngineering, Inc.0NORTH153060FEDCBA12345678MNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:Scale:Greg A. Buchal, P.E.Date: Lic. No.:I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the state of Minnesota.GABMTH03.04.202212216147RevisionsDescriptionDateNumNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION03.04.2022 SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL3/4/2022 8:56:39 AM INDEPENDENT SCHOOLDISTRICT #624Oneka ElementarySchool Addition andRenovation4855 Bloom AvenueWhite Bear Lake, MN 551104888 Heritage Pkwy NorthHugo, MN 55038PROPOSED CONTOURS - MAJOR INTERVALGRADE BREAK LINEPROPOSED CONTOURS - MINOR INTERVAL949950950EXISTING CONTOURS2.0%GRADE SLOPESILT FENCE, SEE DETAIL 3/C701RIP-RAP / ROCK CONST. ENTRANCEINLET PROTECTIONLEGEND1.Owner and Contractor shall obtain MPCA-NPDES permit. Contractor shall be responsible for allfees pertaining to this permit. The SWPPP shall be kept onsite at all times.2.Install temporary erosion control measures (inlet protection, silt fence, and rock constructionentrances) prior to beginning any excavation or demolition work at the site.3.Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the absolute minimum. Thecontractor shall install temporary earth dikes, sediment traps or basins, additional siltationfencing, and/or disk the soil parallel to the contours as deemed necessary to further controlerosion. All changes shall be recorded in the SWPPP.4.All construction site entrances shall be surfaced with crushed rock across the entire width of theentrance and from the entrance to a point 50' into the construction zone.5.The toe of the silt fence shall be trenched in a minimum of 6”. The trench backfill shall becompacted with a vibratory plate compactor.6.All grading operations shall be conducted in a manner to minimize the potential for site erosion.Sediment control practices must be established on all down gradient perimeters before any upgradient land disturbing activities begin.7.All exposed soil areas must be stabilized as soon as possible to limit soil erosion but in no caselater than 7 days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily orpermanently ceased. Temporary stockpiles without significant silt, clay or organic components(e.g., clean aggregate stockpiles, demolition concrete stockpiles, sand stockpiles) and theconstructed base components of roads, parking lots and similar surfaces are exempt from thisrequirement.8.The normal wetted perimeter of any temporary or permanent drainage ditch or swale that drainswater from any portion of the construction site, or diverts water around the site, must be stabilizedwithin 200 lineal feet from the property edge, or from the point of discharge into any surfacewater. Stabilization of the last 200 lineal feet must be completed within 24 hours after connectingto a surface water. Stabilization of the remaining portions of any temporary or permanent ditchesor swales must be complete within 7 days after connecting to a surface water and construction inthat portion of the ditch has temporarily or permanently ceased.9.Pipe outlets must be provided with energy dissipation within 24 hours of connection to surfacewater.10.All riprap shall be installed with a filter material or soil separation fabric and comply with theMinnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications.11.All storm sewers discharging into wetlands or water bodies shall outlet at or below the normalwater level of the respective wetland or water body at an elevation where the downstream slopeis 1 percent or flatter. The normal water level shall be the invert elevation of the outlet of thewetland or water body.12.All storm sewer catch basins not needed for site drainage during construction shall be covered toprevent runoff from entering the storm sewer system. Catch basins necessary for site drainageduring construction shall be provided with inlet protection.13.In areas where concentrated flows occur (such as swales and areas in front of storm catch basinsand intakes) the erosion control facilities shall be backed by stabilization structure to protectthose facilities from the concentrated flows.14.Inspect the construction site once every seven days during active construction and within 24hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. All inspections shall be recordedin the SWPPP.15.All BMPs must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented when they become nonfunctional or thesediment reaches 1/3 of the capacity. These repairs must be made within 24 hours of discovery,or as soon as field conditions allow access. All repairs shall be recorded in the SWPPP.16.If sediment escapes the construction site, off-site accumulations of sediment must be removed ina manner and at a frequency sufficient to minimize off-site impacts.17.All soils tracked onto pavement shall be removed daily.18.All infiltration areas must be inspected to ensure that no sediment from ongoing constructionactivity is reaching the infiltration area and these areas are protected from compaction due toconstruction equipment driving across the infiltration area.19.Temporary soil stockpiles must have silt fence or other effective sediment controls, and cannot beplaced in surface waters, including stormwater conveyances such as curb and gutter systems, orconduits and ditches unless there is a bypass in place for the stormwater.20.Collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric,construction and demolition debris and other wastes must be disposed of properly and mustcomply with MPCA disposal requirements.21.Oil, gasoline, paint and any hazardous substances must be properly stored, including secondarycontainment, to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access to storage areas mustbe provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste must be incompliance with MPCA regulations.22.External washing of trucks and other construction vehicles must be limited to a defined area ofthe site. Runoff must be contained and waste properly disposed of. No engine degreasing isallowed onsite.23.All liquid and solid wastes generated by concrete washout operations must be contained in aleak-proof containment facility or impermeable liner. A compacted clay liner that does not allowwashout liquids to enter ground water is considered an impermeable liner. The liquid and solidwastes must not contact the ground, and there must not be runoff from the concrete washoutoperations or areas. Liquid and solid wastes must be disposed of properly and in compliancewith MPCA regulations. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility to informconcrete equipment operators to utilize the proper facilities.24.Upon completion of the project and stabilization of all graded areas, all temporary erosion controlfacilities (silt fences, hay bales, etc.) shall be removed from the site.25.All permanent sedimentation basins must be restored to their design condition immediatelyfollowing stabilization of the site.26.Contractor shall submit Notice of Termination for MPCA-NPDES permit within 30 days after FinalStabilization.27.Where five (5) or more acres of disturbed soil drain to a common location, the contractor mustprovide a temporary sediment basin that meets MPCA Stormwater Permit guidelines. Thetemporary basin must provide live storage for a calculated volume of runoff from a two (2)-year,24-hour storm from each acre drained to the basin or 1,800 cubic feet of live storage per acredrained, whichever is greater.28.Erosion control blankets are to be placed on all 1:4 slopes or greater.EROSION CONTROL NOTESC400EROSIONCONTROLPLANCONCRETE WASHOUT STATION(TO BE DETERMINED ON SITE)EROSION CONTROL BLANKET,SEE DETAIL 4/C701BIO ROLL, SEE DETAIL 2/C701NWLNWLEXISTING WETLAND EDGENEW WETLAND EDGE NEW BUILDING ADDITIONFFE: 926.10 (ARCH 100' 00")Manhole 198rim=922.94inv=918.24Manhole 197rim=922.55inv=916.32Manhole 196rim=922.91inv=915.95Manhole 189rim=921.16inv=915.22Manhole 186rim=921.55inv (N,S)=912.89inv (E)=914.29Manhole 187rim=921.16inv=914.60Manhole 185rim=922.54inv=912.6248" RCP36" RCP15" RCP15" RCP24" RCP33" RCP24" RCP12" RCP12" HDPESanitary Manhole 15-2rim=922.74inv (NW, NE)=904.3410"inv (SW)=904.48"8" P V CManholerim=925.53Manholerim=925.34Manholerim=925.34TRENCH DRAIN8" HDPEONEKA ELEMENTARYFESinv=918.32inv = 920.25 (per plan)rim=921.76FESinv=918.13RIP RAP EOF SPILLWAYelev. = 920.30CONTROL STRUCTURE (BURIED)-DATA PER PLANSrim = 922.00inv in = 918.50 (12" NE)inv out = 918.50 (12" SW)sump = 914.50CONNECT TO BLDG FOOTINGDRAIN AT IE = 921.00(PER PLANS)inv = 920.5012" HDPE (Per Plans)Watermain (as located)W a t e r m a i n ( a s l o c a t e d )Watermain (as located)8" PVC S a n i t a r y s e w e r p e r p l a n s (not loca t e d )CONNECT TO BLDG@ inv = 918.00(PER PLANS)PSMH 3 (Per Plans, not located)rim=923.90inv in=915.06 (8" N)inv out=914.96 (EX. 8" S)FES (PER PLANS)inv=918.50FES (Per Plans)inv=920.50CONTROL STRUCTURE (BURIED)-DATA PER PLANSrim = 923.00inv in = 920.50 (12" E)inv out = 920.50 (12" W)sump = 916.50FESinv=920.13Watermain per plans(not located)Watermain p e r p l a n s (not locate d )FES (Per Plans)8" HDPEPer Plansinv = 921.00FES (Per Plans)8" HDPE12" HDPEONEKA PARKWAY NWWDrainage & Utility Easement per plat of WATERS EDGEDrainage & Utility Easement per plat of WATERS EDGEPonding & Flowage Easement over all of Drainage &Utility Easement of Outlot A, WATERS EDGE per Doc.No. 596408 & 3482732Ponding & Flowage Easement over all of Drainage &Utility Easement of Outlot A, WATERS EDGE per Doc.No. 596408 & 3482732WWW8"inv=921.578"inv=920.82W E T L A N D TBOTTOM = 917.00PERMANENT POOL = 920.50100 YR HWL = 921.60EOF = 922.30MEASURED ELEV. 11/03/21 = 920.78MEASURED ELEV. 02/21/22 = 920.44(ICE)P O N D 4BOTTOM = 915.00PERMANENT POOL = 918.50100 YR HWL = 920.30MEASURED ELEV. 11/03/21 = 919.11MEASURED ELEV. 02/21/22 = 918.37(ICE)P O N D 3Wetland Delineationper Kjolhaug Environmental Services Inc.Nov. 2021(typical)NEW BUILDING ADDITIONFFE: 926.10 (ARCH 100' 00")45° BEND(TYP. OF 2)45° BEND(TYP. OF 2)45° BEND(TYP. OF 2)8" X 8" TEE6" REDUCERSAN MH-1RIM: 925.30*INV (E): 917.67INV (N/S): 917.17*8" GV W/ BOX8" GV W/ BOX6" SAN COORD. W/ MECH.INV: 919.976" DOM WM W/ GVCOORD. W/ MECH.INV: 918.10115 LF 6" PVC(SCH. 40)@ 2.00%FES-2INV: 920.5878 LF 18" HDPE@ 1.00%153 LF 12" HDPE@ 1.00%18" RD COORD. W/ MECH.INV: 920.2860 LF 6" NON-PERF. DT @ 0.50%INV: 919.01MITERED GRATE-1INV: 918.71MITERED GRATE-2INV: 922.0065 LF 6" DT@ 0.50%INLINE DRAIN-1RIM: 925.90INV: 922.04FES-1INV: 919.506" PERFORATED DTINV: 919.58INV: 919.42INV: 919.12INV: 919.3245° BEND(TYP. OF 2)6" GV W/ BOX3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comC 2021 Larson Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.P:\Projects\Projects - 2021\12216147 - Oneka Elem Addition & Renovation - Wold\C. Design\Drawing Files\12216147 - C500 Utility.dwg 3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comLarsonEngineering, Inc.0NORTH153060FEDCBA12345678MNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:Scale:Greg A. Buchal, P.E.Date: Lic. No.:I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the state of Minnesota.GABMTH03.04.202212216147RevisionsDescriptionDateNumNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION03.04.2022 SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL3/4/2022 8:56:51 AM INDEPENDENT SCHOOLDISTRICT #624Oneka ElementarySchool Addition andRenovation4855 Bloom AvenueWhite Bear Lake, MN 551104888 Heritage Pkwy NorthHugo, MN 55038UTILITY NOTES1.It is the responsibility of the contractor to perform or coordinate all necessary utilityconnections and relocations from existing utility locations to the proposed building,as well as to all onsite amenities. These connections include but are not limited towater, sanitary sewer, cable TV, telephone, gas, electric, site lighting, etc.2.All service connections shall be performed in accordance with state and localstandard specifications for construction. Utility connections (sanitary sewer,watermain, and storm sewer) may require a permit from the City.3.The contractor shall verify the elevations at proposed connections to existingutilities prior to any demolition or excavation.4.The contractor shall notify all appropriate engineering departments and utilitycompanies 72 hours prior to construction. All necessary precautions shall be madeto avoid damage to existing utilities.5.Storm sewer requires testing in accordance with Minnesota plumbing code4714.1109 where located within 10 feet of waterlines or the building.6.HDPE storm sewer piping shall meet ASTM F2306 and fittings shall meet ASTMD3212 joint pressure test. Installation shall meet ASTM C2321.7.All RCP pipe shown on the plans shall be MN/DOT class 5.8.Maintain a minimum of 7 ½' of cover over all water lines. Where 7 ½' of cover is notprovided, install 2” rigid polystyrene insulation (MN/DOT 3760) with a thermalresistance of at least 5 and a compressive strength of at least 25 psi. Insulationshall be 8' wide, centered over pipe with 6” sand cushion between pipe andinsulation. Where depth is less than 5', use 4” of insulation.9.Install water lines 12” above sewers. Where the sewer is less than 12" below thewater line (or above), install sewer piping of materials approved for inside buildinguse for 10 feet on each side of the crossing.10.All watermain piping shall be class 52 ductile iron pipe unless noted otherwise.11.See Project Specifications for bedding requirements.12.Pressure test and disinfect all new watermains in accordance with state and localrequirements.13.Sanitary sewer piping shall be PVC, SDR-35 for depths less than 12', PVC SDR-26for depths between 12' and 26', and class 52 D.I.P. for depths of 26' or more.Sanitary sewer shall be Schedule 40 PVC where crossing over waterlines.14.Storm Sewer shall be Schedule 40 PVC where crossing over waterlines andconnecting to building services.C500UTILITY PLANLEGENDCABLE UNDERGROUND LINEFIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND LINEELECTRIC UNDERGROUND LINEELECTRIC OVERHEAD LINETELEPHONE UNDERGROUND LINESTORM SEWER PIPESANITARY SEWER PIPENATURAL GAS UNDERGROUND LINEWATERMAIN PIPEDRAINTILE PIPEPIPE INSULATION, DETAIL 16/C700LIGHT POLE, BY ELECTRICALSTORM MANHOLEFLARED ENDCURB INLETCATCH BASINWATER SHUTOFFGATE VALVE & BOXHYDRANTSANITARY MANHOLEINV = XXX.XX* - TO BE COORDINATED OR VERIFIEDNWLNWLNWLNWLEXISTING WETLAND EDGENEW WETLAND EDGE 3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comC 2021 Larson Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.P:\Projects\Projects - 2021\12216147 - Oneka Elem Addition & Renovation - Wold\C. Design\Drawing Files\12216147 - WIP C700 Details.dwg3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comLarsonEngineering, Inc.FEDCBA12345678MNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:Scale:Greg A. Buchal, P.E.Date: Lic. No.:I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the state of Minnesota.GABMTH03.04.202212216147RevisionsDescriptionDateNumNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION03.04.2022 SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL3/4/2022 8:55:51 AMINDEPENDENT SCHOOLDISTRICT #624Oneka ElementarySchool Addition andRenovation4855 Bloom AvenueWhite Bear Lake, MN 551104888 Heritage Pkwy NorthHugo, MN 55038C600DETAILSNOT TO SCALEPAVEMENT SECTIONBITUMINOUS1C600APPROVED SUBGRADE SOILNEW 8" BASEAGGREGATENEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT2" WEAR COURSE2" BASE COURSENOT TO SCALECONSTRUCTION DETAILCONCRETE2C600APPROVED SUBGRADE SOILNEW 6" BASEAGGREGATENEW 5" PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE1'SECTION A-APLANR18"BACKFILL WITH NEWGOOD QUALITYTOPSOIL AND SODNOT TO SCALECURB CUT DETAIL3C60013.5"6"6"2'EXISTING SUBGRADE SOILNEW BASEAGGREGATESLOPE 34"PER FT.NOT TO SCALETREE PLANTING DETAIL6C600EQUALS TWICE BALLDIAMETER12"MIN.18"MIN.OPTIONAL STAKINGMETHOD - 6' METALPOSTS AND RUBBERHOSE STRAPSHOSE LOOPS3 GUYS EACH OF10 GAUGE TWISTEDWIRE 120 DEGREESAPART AROUND TREECOLOREDFLAGS1 PER WIRETURNBUCKLE6" DEEP MULCH, HOLDBACK 2" FROM STEM.SOD24" STAKE TYP.PLACE PLANTINGMEDIUM SOILSFOLD BACKBURLAP ANDREMOVE ALLTIES &/ORWIRES FROMTOP OF BALLSCARIFY ALL SIDESAND BOTTOM OFEXCAVATED HOLEDECIDUOUS TREEAS PER SCHEDULECONIFEROUS TREEAS PER SCHEDULE2" DOW HI-40 INSULATION OR EQUAL6" PIPE BEDDING MATERIAL(MNDOT 3149.2F)6" PIPE BEDDING MATERIAL(MNDOT 3149.2F). DEPTH SHALL BEMECHANICALLY COMPACTED & LEVELEDTO PERMIT PROPER DRAINAGE FORINSULATION BOARD.PIPE8'FINISHED SURFACEMECHANICALLYCOMPACTEDBACKFILL MATERIAL TO95% OF MAXIMUMSPECIFIED DENSITY.NOT TO SCALEPIPE INSULATION DETAIL7C6006"NOT TO SCALE CROSS SECTIONFILTRATION BASIN5C600SLOPE PER PLAN(3:1 MAX)PER PLANVARIESVARIESGRASS BUFFERSTRIPUNDISTURBED ANDUNCOMPACTEDINSITU SOILPER PLAN6"18" MINWQV: 923.00MNDOT NATIVE SEEDMIXTURE 33-2619" MINPRE-MIXED PLANTING MEDIUM:PLAISTED'S RAIN GARDEN PEAT MIX(80% CLEAN CONSTRUCTION SAND,20% PEAT), OR EQUAL IF APPROVEDBY CITY ENGINEER. PLANTINGMEDIUM SHALL PROVIDE A MINIMUM1.6"/HR, VERIFY W/ SUPPLIER.FINE FILTER AGGREGATE(MNDOT SPEC 3149.2J). FINEFILTER AGGREGATE SHALLPROVIDE A MINIMUM 0.8"/HR,VERIFY W/ SUPPLIER.4" PERFORATED DRAINTILEWITHOUT FILTER SOCK.(SEE SHEET C500 FOR DRAINTILE LAYOUT)FILTRATION BASIN NOTES:1.SOILS WITHIN FILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM COMPACTION DUE TO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC.AREAS SHALL BE STAKED AND MARKED OFF, WITH ONLY LOW IMPACT EQUIPMENT (TRACKED OR SIMILAR)ALLOWED.2.PROVIDE AS-BUILT SURVEY TO VERIFY CONSTRUCTED VOLUME. CORRECT NON-COMPLIANT BASINS.2" LAYER OF CHOKER COURSE, #8, #78, OR #89STONE ABOVE THE LAYER OF WASHED #57 STONE3" LAYER OF WASHED #57 STONE ABOVE AND ONEACH SIDE OF THE DRAINTILE PIPES12" MINMITERED DRAIN GRATEFOR INFORMATION SEE WEB SITEAT WWW.MITEREDDRAIN.COM(707) 620-0606PIPECOUPLINGFLOWSLOPENOT TO SCALEMITRED END GRATE DETAIL4C600NOT TO SCALES518 CURB DETAIL8C600PER PLAN2'1:121:127' MAXPER PLAN7' MAX2% MAX2% MAXPOWDER-COATEDCAST-IRONTRUNCATED DOMES2% MAX SLOPE INANY DIRECTIONNOT TO SCALEWITH TRUNCATED DOMESACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAIL9C600 3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comC 2021 Larson Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.P:\Projects\Projects - 2021\12216147 - Oneka Elem Addition & Renovation - Wold\C. Design\Drawing Files\12216147 - WIP C700 Details.dwg3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comLarsonEngineering, Inc.FEDCBA12345678MNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:Scale:Greg A. Buchal, P.E.Date: Lic. No.:I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the state of Minnesota.GABMTH03.04.202212216147RevisionsDescriptionDateNumNOT FOR CONSTRUCTION03.04.2022 SITE PLAN SUBMITTAL3/4/2022 8:55:59 AMINDEPENDENT SCHOOLDISTRICT #624Oneka ElementarySchool Addition andRenovation4855 Bloom AvenueWhite Bear Lake, MN 551104888 Heritage Pkwy NorthHugo, MN 55038C601ENGINEERING FABRICWIRE MESH REINFORCEMENTHIGH FLOW AREASNATURAL SOILDIRECTIONOF RUNOFFNOT TO SCALEINSTALLATION DETAILSILT FENCE3C601NOTE: DEPENDING UPON CONFIGURATION, ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE MESHWITH HOG RINGS, STEEL POSTS WITH WIRES, OR WOOD POSTS WITH STAPLES.FABRIC ANCHORAGETRENCH. BACKFILL WITHTAMPED NATURAL SOILGEOTEXTILE FABRIC50' MINIMUM6" MINIMUM1"-2" WASHED ROCKNOT TO SCALEROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE1C601AS REQUIREDPUBLIC ROADHARD SURFACE/FLOW8" CURLEX SEDIMENT LOGSWOOD STAKE OR SAND BAG24" MIN.WOOD STAKE TO ONLYPENETRATE NETTING,NOT CURLEX MATERIALRRGROUNDNOTES:1. STAKE OR SAND BAG SPACING SHALL BE 2 FEET O.C.NOT TO SCALEBIO ROLL DETAIL2C601METAL, WOOD POST, OR STAKE.8' MAX. SPACING, 2' INTO GROUND.Staples/Anchors:The type of anchors used to secure the blanket to theground shall be Steel wire11 Gauge 1” wide x 8” long.NOT TO SCALEEROSION CONTROL BLANKET4C601NOTE: WHEN USING CELL-O-SEED DO NOT SEED PREPARED AREA. CELL-O-SEED MUST BE INSTALLED WITH PAPER SIDE DOWN.3" (7.5 CM) OVERLAP. STAPLE THROUGH OVERLAPPED AREA, APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM) APART ACROSS ENTIRE*IN LOOSE SOIL CONDITIONS, THE USE OF STAPLE OR STAKE LENGTHS GREATER THAN 6" (15 CM) MAY BE NECESSARY TOBACKFILL AND COMPACT THE TRENCH AFTER STAPLING. APPLY SEED TO COMPACTED SOIL AND FOLD REMAINING 12" (30 CM) IN APPROPRIATE LOCATIONS AS SHOWN IN THE STAPLE PATTERN GUIDE. WHEN USING THE DOT SYSTEM , STAPLES/STAKES SHOULD BE PLACED THROUGH EACH OF THE COLORED DOTS CORRESPONDING TO THE APPROPRIATE STAPLE PATTERN.1. PREPARE SOIL BEFORE INSTALLING ROLLED EROSION CONTROL PRODUCTS (RECP's), INCLUDING ANY NECESSARY APPLICATION 3. ROLL THE RECP's (A.) DOWN OR (B.) HORIZONTALLY ACROSS THE SLOPE. RECP's WILL UNROLL WITH APPROPRIATE SIDE 4. THE EDGES OF PARALLEL RECP's MUST BE STAPLED WITH APPROXIMATELY 2" - 5" (5 CM - 12.5 CM) OVERLAP DEPENDING5. CONSECUTIVE RECP's SPLICED DOWN THE SLOPE MUST BE PLACED END OVER END (SHINGLE STYLE) WITH AN APPROXIMATE AGAINST THE SOIL SURFACE. ALL RECP's MUST BE SECURELY FASTENED TO SOIL SURFACE BY PLACING STAPLES/STAKES2. BEGIN AT THE TOP OF THE SLOPE BY ANCHORING THE RECP's IN A 6" (15 CM) DEEP X 6" (15 CM) WIDE TRENCHWITH APPROXIMATELY 12" (30cm) OF RECP's EXTENDED BEYOND THE UP-SLOPE PORTION OF THE TRENCH. ANCHOR THERECP's WITH A ROW OF STAPLES/STAKES APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM) APART IN THE BOTTOM OF THE TRENCH.PORTION OF RECP's BACK OVER SEED AND COMPACTED SOIL. SECURE RECP's OVER COMPACTED SOIL WITH A ROW OFSTAPLES/STAKES SPACED APPROXIMATELY 12" (30 CM) APART ACROSS THE WIDTH OF THE RECP's. OF LIME, FERTILIZER, AND SEED.PROPERLY SECURE THE RECP's.EVANSVILLE, IN 4772514649 HIGHWAY 41 NORTHAMERICANGuaranteedEROSION CONTROL 800-772-2040www.nagreen.comGREENNORTHSOLUTIONSProducts1.3B.12"(30 cm)(15 cm)6"3A.2"-5"4.(5cm-12.5cm)(7.5cm)3"2.(15 cm)6"NOT TO SCALEDEVICE (OR APPROVED EQ.)INFRASAFE INLET PROTECTION 5C601400 MICRON FILTERBAG IN EACH BASKET2 BASKETS WITH 400 MICRON FILTERBAGS. TO BE CHECKED PERIODICALLY ANDCLEANED OUT AFTER EACH RAIN EVENTFITS NEENAH 1642 AND1733 FRAMES OR EQUALPLANPROFILENOT TO SCALERIP-RAP AT OUTLETS6C601D5D (10' MIN.)41412'2'MN/DOT CLASS IIIRIP-RAPAAMN/DOT CLASS IIIRIP-RAP2'PLANSECTION A-ANOTE:FW300 MIRAFI FABRIC OR EQUAL5D (10' MIN.)2'2'2'WOVEN FILTERFABRIC6"14 DWOVEN FILTERFABRICNOT TO SCALESECTION DETAILFLARED END7C60158" SMOOTH BAR @2" O.C. EACH WAYPROVIDE 3 CLIPS TO FASTEN TRASH GUARD TO F.E.S.HOT DIP GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION.24"MAX 6"MAXNOTES:1. MEGALUGS TO BE USED AT ALL MECHANICAL JOINTS2. PLACE CONCRETE BLOCK UNDER ALL GATE VALVES AND HYDRANTS3. THRUST BLOCKING AT ALL TEES, BENDS, AND AT HYDRANTS4. ALL BOLTS INCLUDING T-BOLTS SHALL BE COR-BLUE.BENDSDENOTESMEGALUGSHYDRANT LEADSSLEEVESNOT TO SCALETHRUST BLOCK LOCATIONSTYPICAL MEGALUG AND10C601DETAILSBUILDINGSLOPETODRAINNYLOPLASTDUCTILEIRONNYLOPLAST 12" BY X"INLINE DRAIN5" CONCRETEDUCTILE IRON GRATEPER PLAN5'2' 6"PER PLANNOT TO SCALEINLINE DRAIN DETAIL11C6012' 6"12" FIBERBOARD EXPANSIONMATERIAL NEXT TO BUILDINGW/ ELASTOMERIC JOINTSEALANTELBOW / WYEDUCTILE IRON GRATEH-20, STANDARDSCREW TYPE"MEGA LUG"NOT TO SCALEGATE VALVE DETAIL9C601MANHOLE FRAME & COVER: NEENAH R-1642,TYPE B LID, WITH MACHINED BEARING SURFACES &LETTERED "SANITARY SEWER" WITH TWO CONCEALEDPICK HOLES, OR APPROVED EQUAL.27"VARIABLE1'-4"4'-0"VARIABLE5" MIN.1'-8"MAX.1'-0" MAX.16"20" TOSPRING LINEMAXFLOWNOT TO SCALESEWER MANHOLE DETAILSANITARY8C6018"2/3 DIA. (I.D.)OF PIPENOTES:1.) GROUT BOTTOM OF MANHOLE TO 1/2OR 2/3 DIAMETER OF PIPE AND SLOPEGROUT 2" PER FOOT.2.) 1/4" TO 1/2" IS MAX. MORTAR THICKNESSWITH USED FOR CASTING ADJUSTMENT.3.) COPOLYMER POLYPROPYLENE PLASTIC,WITH GRADE 60 STEEL REINFORCEMENTOR APPROVED EQUAL, STEPS 16" O.C.DOWNSTREAM SIDE.4.) KOR-N-SEAL MANHOLE OR EQUALCONSIDERED ACCEPTABLE ALTERNATE.SECTION A-ASECTION B-BADJUST CASTING TO 1/2" BELOW FINISHBLACKTOP GRADE.FULL MORTAR BED BETWEEN CASTING, RINGS, ANDMANHOLE STRUCTURE. MORTAR THE OUTSIDE OF THERINGS WITH NON-SHRINK GROUT. NO SHIMS OF ANYMATERIAL ARE ALLOWED. INSTALL EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL.2" ADJUSTING RINGS AS REQUIRED (MIN. 3" HEIGHT,MAX.12" HEIGHT) INCLUDES MORTAR.CL. II REINFORCEDCONCRETE PIPE.ALL BUTTED JOINTS BETWEEN SECTIONSSHALL HAVE 'O' RING RUBBER GASKETS.PRECAST CONCRETE SLABWITH #4 REBAR @ 8" E.W.SLOPE: 2"/FTCOMPACT TO TOP OFPIPE, TO FIRST JOINT.WATERTIGHT CONNECTION(BOOT, TYPICAL)PIPE SHALL BE CUT OUTFLUSH WITH INSIDE FACE OF WALL.ABBA UP UP UP ##EXIT LOAD OCCUPANT LOAD MAIN PATH OF EGRESS NEW 2 HOUR FIRE BARRIER (SHAFT ENCLOSURES: 707.3.1, HORIZ EXITS: 1025.1 /707 /711, OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS: 508.4, INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAY/ EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAY: 1022.2, /707 /711) DOOR OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: NEW 1 HOUR FIRE BARRIER (SHAFT ENCLOSURES: 707.3.1, INCIDENTAL USE AREAS: 509, OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS: 508.4, INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAY/ EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAY: 1022.2, /707 /711) 60 MIN. (SHAFT ENCLOSURES) 45 MIN. (INCIDENTAL USE AREAS, OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS) 60 MIN. OPENINGS: 100 SQ IN MAX, 33" MAX HT, 10" MAX WIDTH 45 MIN. OPENINGS: 1296 SQ IN MAX, 54" MAX HT, 54" MAX WIDTH 90 MIN. FIRE DAMPER (NOT REQUIRED WITH DUCTED HVAC) 90 MIN FIRE/ SMOKE DAMPER (AT SHAFT ENCLOSURES) NEW 2 HOUR FIRE WALL (AREA SEPARATIONS: 706.1, HORIZONTAL EXITS: 1025.1) DOOR OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: CONSTRUCTION CAPABLE OF RESISTING THE PASSAGE OF SMOKE (509.4.2 / MN PR-01) GAPS < 1 1/2": GAPS > 1 1/2": DOOR CLOSERS REQ'D: TRANSFER DUCTS: STANDARD DUCTS: EXISTING 2 HOUR FIRE WALL-NOT UPGRADED. ALL NEW WORK TO CONFORM (AREA SEPARATIONS: 706.1, HORIZONTAL EXITS: 1025.1) EXISTING 2 HOUR FIRE BARRIER-NOT UPGRADED. ALL NEW WORK TO CONFORM (SHAFT ENCLOSURES: 707.3.1, HORIZ EXITS: 1025.1 /707 /711, OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS: 508.4, INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAY/ EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAY: 1022.2, /707 /711) EXISTING 1 HOUR FIRE BARRIER-NOT UPGRADED. ALL NEW WORK TO CONFORM (SHAFT ENCLOSURES: 707.3.1, INCIDENTAL USE AREAS: 509, OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS: 508.4, INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAY/ EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAY: 1022.2, /707 /711) EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CAPABLE OF RESISTING THE PASSAGE OF SMOKE-NOT UPGRADED. ALL NEW WORK TO CONFORM (509.4.2 / MN PR-01) CODE LEGEND DOOR OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: DOOR OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: DOOR OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: ## ## NEW ZERO RATED CORRIDOR (1018.1 WITH SPRINKLER SYSTEM) OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: NOTE: 0 MIN. 0 MIN. CORRIDOR CANNOT BE USED AS SUPPLY, RETURN, EXHAUST, RELIEF OR VENTILATION AIR DUCTS. RETURN AIR PLENUMS ARE ALLOWED. (1018.5.1) EXISTING ZERO RATED CORRIDOR- NOT UPGRADED. ALL NEW WORK TO CONFORM (1018.1 WITH SPRINKLER SYSTEM) OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: NOTE: 0 MIN. 0 MIN. CORRIDOR CANNOT BE USED AS SUPPLY, RETURN, EXHAUST, RELIEF OR VENTILATION AIR DUCTS. RETURN AIR PLENUMS ARE ALLOWED. (1018.5.1) MINERAL WOOL OR FIRE SAFING SMOKE SEALANT (SMOKE GASKETING NOT REQUIRED) SMOKE DAMPER SMOKE / FIRE DAMPER NOT REQUIRED DOOR OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: 60 MIN. (SHAFT ENCLOSURES) 45 MIN. (INCIDENTAL USE AREAS, OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS) 60 MIN. OPENINGS: 100 SQ IN MAX, 33" MAX HT, 10" MAX WIDTH 45 MIN. OPENINGS: 1296 SQ IN MAX, 54" MAX HT, 54" MAX WIDTH 90 MIN. FIRE DAMPER (NOT REQUIRED WITH DUCTED HVAC) 90 MIN FIRE/ SMOKE DAMPER (AT SHAFT ENCLOSURES) 90 MIN. 100 SQ IN MAX, 33" MAX HT, 10" MAX WIDTH 90 MIN. FIRE DAMPER 90 MIN FIRE/ SMOKE DAMPER (AT SHAFT ENCLOSURES) 90 MIN. 100 SQ IN MAX, 33" MAX HT, 10" MAX WIDTH 90 MIN. FIRE DAMPER 90 MIN FIRE/ SMOKE DAMPER (AT SHAFT ENCLOSURES) 90 MIN.; < 25% LENGTH OF WALL 90 MIN. 100 SQ. IN. MAX 90 MIN. FIRE DAMPER 90 MIN.; < 25% LENGTH OF WALL 90 MIN. 100 SQ. IN. MAX 90 MIN. FIRE DAMPER GAPS < 1 1/2": GAPS > 1 1/2": DOOR CLOSERS REQ'D: TRANSFER DUCTS: STANDARD DUCTS: MINERAL WOOL OR FIRE SAFING SMOKE SEALANT (SMOKE GASKETING NOT REQUIRED) SMOKE DAMPER SMOKE / FIRE DAMPER NOT REQUIRED M N O N L Y M N O N L Y 43 20 SF CLASSROOM 43 20 SF CLASSROOM 43 20 SF CLASSROOM 43 20 SF CLASSROOM 42 20 SF CLASSROOM 10 20 SF FLEX ROOM 10 20 SF FLEX ROOM 10 20 SF FLEX ROOM 6 20 SF SMALL GROUP 5 20 SF MECH / ELEC 29 20 SF CROSS-CAT 13 20 SF FLEX ROOM 31 20 SF READING AREA 9 20 SF SMALL GROUP 9 20 SF SMALL GROUP 187 20 SF LEARNING COMMONS 21 20 SF WORKROOM / TECH 48 20 SF SPANISH 1 300 SF ELEC 11 20 SF FLEX ROOM 46 20 SF CLASSROOM 14 20 SF FLEX 45 20 SF CLASSROOM 44 20 SF CLASSROOM 44 20 SF CLASSROOM 44 20 SF CLASSROOM 46 20 SF CLASSROOM 45 20 SF CLASSROOM 44 20 SF CLASSROOM 44 20 SF CLASSROOM 45 20 SF CLASSROOM 14 20 SF FLEX 41 20 SF CLASSROOM 37 20 SF CLASSROOM 44 20 SF CLASSROOM 52 20 SF CLASSROOM 52 20 SF CLASSROOM43 20 SF CLASSROOM 24 20 SF TEACH 45 20 SF COMPUTER 55 20 SF MUSIC 55 20 SF MUSIC 54 20 SF SCHOOL AGE CARE 13 20 SF STORAGE 626 20 SF GYM 21 20 SF PARENT ROOM 15 20 SF HEADEND ROOM 40 20 SF STAFF LOUNGE 18 20 SF NURSE 25 20 SF WORK ROOM 13 20 SF FILE/ STORAGE 16 20 SF CONFERENCE 7 20 SF OFFICE 12 20 SF PRINCIPAL 40 20 SF WAITING 6 20 SF SEATING 12 20 SF VESTIBULE 28 20 SF SERVING 52 20 SF FOOD SERVICE 64 20 SF Room 40 20 SF FACILITIES/ RECEIVING 5 20 SF OFFICE 11 20 SF ELEC ROOM 5 20 SF OFFICE 8 20 SF DRY STORAGE 11 20 SF DISHWASHING 9 20 SF TABLE STORAGE12 20 SF LOCKABLE STORAGE 13 20 SF GENERATOR 3 20 SF JANITOR 5 20 SF VAULT 6 20 SF TREATMENT 14 20 SF STORAGE 5 20 SF JANITOR 5 20 SF STORAGE 10 20 SF ELECTRICAL 182 20 SF CAFETORIUM 68 20 SF PLATFORM 17 20 SF Room 2 20 SF STORAGE 5 20 SF OFFICE T T T T3 20 SF STORAGE 4 20 SF STORAGE T F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 501 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 krausanderson.com | 612 332 7281 3/18/2022 10:20:50 AMBIM 360://Oneka Elementary School Addition and Renovation/192233_Oneka ES Addition and Renovations -Central.rvt1/16" = 1'-0"Central: BIM 360://Oneka Elementary School Addition and Renovation/192233_Oneka ES Addition and Renovations- Central.rvt A0.101 MAIN LEVEL CODE PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY SUBMITTAL 03.04.2022 TME KH 04/15/22 192233 Minnesota 04/15/2022 Paul Aplikowski 42737 ARCHITECT ONEKA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITION AND RENOVATION 4888 Heritage Parkway N. Hugo, Minnesota 55038 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #624 4855 Bloom Ave White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 0 1/16" = 1'-0" MAIN LEVEL CODE PLANF2 12' 24' Revisions Description Date Num KEY PLAN A B OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW OPEN TO BELOW ROOF ROOF ROOF ROOF 42 20 SF COMPUTER 43 20 SF CLASSROOM 43 20 SF CLASSROOM 42 20 SF CLASSROOM 42 20 SF CLASSROOM 13 20 SF FLEX 61 20 SF WET LAB 45 20 SF CLASSROOM 42 20 SF CLASSROOM 42 20 SF CLASSROOM 14 20 SF FLEX 5 20 SF STORAGE 44 20 SF CLASSROOM 61 20 SF WET LAB 45 20 SF CLASSROOM 42 20 SF CLASSROOM 42 20 SF CLASSROOM 45 20 SF CLASSROOM 47 20 SF CLASSROOM 20 20 SF FLEX 8 20 SF STORAGE 7 20 SF ELEC 60 20 SF GROUP LEARNING 56 20 SF LOCKERS 8 20 SF ELEC 5 20 SF Room 6 20 SF Room 70 20 SF GROUP LEARNING 35 20 SF LOCKERS 70 20 SF GROUP LEARNING 40 20 SF LOCKERS ##EXIT LOAD OCCUPANT LOAD MAIN PATH OF EGRESS NEW 2 HOUR FIRE BARRIER (SHAFT ENCLOSURES: 707.3.1, HORIZ EXITS: 1025.1 /707 /711, OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS: 508.4, INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAY/ EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAY: 1022.2, /707 /711) DOOR OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: NEW 1 HOUR FIRE BARRIER (SHAFT ENCLOSURES: 707.3.1, INCIDENTAL USE AREAS: 509, OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS: 508.4, INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAY/ EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAY: 1022.2, /707 /711) 60 MIN. (SHAFT ENCLOSURES) 45 MIN. (INCIDENTAL USE AREAS, OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS) 60 MIN. OPENINGS: 100 SQ IN MAX, 33" MAX HT, 10" MAX WIDTH 45 MIN. OPENINGS: 1296 SQ IN MAX, 54" MAX HT, 54" MAX WIDTH 90 MIN. FIRE DAMPER (NOT REQUIRED WITH DUCTED HVAC) 90 MIN FIRE/ SMOKE DAMPER (AT SHAFT ENCLOSURES) NEW 2 HOUR FIRE WALL (AREA SEPARATIONS: 706.1, HORIZONTAL EXITS: 1025.1) DOOR OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: CONSTRUCTION CAPABLE OF RESISTING THE PASSAGE OF SMOKE (509.4.2 / MN PR-01) GAPS < 1 1/2": GAPS > 1 1/2": DOOR CLOSERS REQ'D: TRANSFER DUCTS: STANDARD DUCTS: EXISTING 2 HOUR FIRE WALL-NOT UPGRADED. ALL NEW WORK TO CONFORM (AREA SEPARATIONS: 706.1, HORIZONTAL EXITS: 1025.1) EXISTING 2 HOUR FIRE BARRIER-NOT UPGRADED. ALL NEW WORK TO CONFORM (SHAFT ENCLOSURES: 707.3.1, HORIZ EXITS: 1025.1 /707 /711, OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS: 508.4, INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAY/ EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAY: 1022.2, /707 /711) EXISTING 1 HOUR FIRE BARRIER-NOT UPGRADED. ALL NEW WORK TO CONFORM (SHAFT ENCLOSURES: 707.3.1, INCIDENTAL USE AREAS: 509, OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS: 508.4, INTERIOR EXIT STAIRWAY/ EXIT ACCESS STAIRWAY: 1022.2, /707 /711) EXISTING CONSTRUCTION CAPABLE OF RESISTING THE PASSAGE OF SMOKE-NOT UPGRADED. ALL NEW WORK TO CONFORM (509.4.2 / MN PR-01) CODE LEGEND DOOR OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: DOOR OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: DOOR OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: ## ## NEW ZERO RATED CORRIDOR (1018.1 WITH SPRINKLER SYSTEM) OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: NOTE: 0 MIN. 0 MIN. CORRIDOR CANNOT BE USED AS SUPPLY, RETURN, EXHAUST, RELIEF OR VENTILATION AIR DUCTS. RETURN AIR PLENUMS ARE ALLOWED. (1018.5.1) EXISTING ZERO RATED CORRIDOR- NOT UPGRADED. ALL NEW WORK TO CONFORM (1018.1 WITH SPRINKLER SYSTEM) OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: NOTE: 0 MIN. 0 MIN. CORRIDOR CANNOT BE USED AS SUPPLY, RETURN, EXHAUST, RELIEF OR VENTILATION AIR DUCTS. RETURN AIR PLENUMS ARE ALLOWED. (1018.5.1) MINERAL WOOL OR FIRE SAFING SMOKE SEALANT (SMOKE GASKETING NOT REQUIRED) SMOKE DAMPER SMOKE / FIRE DAMPER NOT REQUIRED DOOR OPENINGS: GLAZING: DUCTWORK: 60 MIN. (SHAFT ENCLOSURES) 45 MIN. (INCIDENTAL USE AREAS, OCCUPANCY SEPARATIONS) 60 MIN. OPENINGS: 100 SQ IN MAX, 33" MAX HT, 10" MAX WIDTH 45 MIN. OPENINGS: 1296 SQ IN MAX, 54" MAX HT, 54" MAX WIDTH 90 MIN. FIRE DAMPER (NOT REQUIRED WITH DUCTED HVAC) 90 MIN FIRE/ SMOKE DAMPER (AT SHAFT ENCLOSURES) 90 MIN. 100 SQ IN MAX, 33" MAX HT, 10" MAX WIDTH 90 MIN. FIRE DAMPER 90 MIN FIRE/ SMOKE DAMPER (AT SHAFT ENCLOSURES) 90 MIN. 100 SQ IN MAX, 33" MAX HT, 10" MAX WIDTH 90 MIN. FIRE DAMPER 90 MIN FIRE/ SMOKE DAMPER (AT SHAFT ENCLOSURES) 90 MIN.; < 25% LENGTH OF WALL 90 MIN. 100 SQ. IN. MAX 90 MIN. FIRE DAMPER 90 MIN.; < 25% LENGTH OF WALL 90 MIN. 100 SQ. IN. MAX 90 MIN. FIRE DAMPER GAPS < 1 1/2": GAPS > 1 1/2": DOOR CLOSERS REQ'D: TRANSFER DUCTS: STANDARD DUCTS: MINERAL WOOL OR FIRE SAFING SMOKE SEALANT (SMOKE GASKETING NOT REQUIRED) SMOKE DAMPER SMOKE / FIRE DAMPER NOT REQUIRED M N O N L Y M N O N L Y F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN NorthCheck: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 501 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 krausanderson.com | 612 332 7281 3/18/2022 10:20:53 AMBIM 360://Oneka Elementary School Addition and Renovation/192233_Oneka ES Addition and Renovations -Central.rvt1/16" = 1'-0"Central: BIM 360://Oneka Elementary School Addition and Renovation/192233_Oneka ES Addition and Renovations- Central.rvt A0.102 UPPER LEVEL CODE PLAN NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY SUBMITTAL 03.04.2022 TME KH 04/15/22 192233 Minnesota 04/15/2022 Paul Aplikowski 42737 ARCHITECT ONEKA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITION AND RENOVATION 4888 Heritage Parkway N. Hugo, Minnesota 55038 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #624 4855 Bloom Ave White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 Revisions Description Date Num 0 1/16" = 1'-0" UPPER LEVEL CODE PLANF2 12' 24' FIRST FLOOR (EXIST) 100'-0" 14 15 16 T.O. MASONRY @ CIRC. (EXIST) 117'-4" ML SILL (EXIST) 103'-4" ML HEAD (EXIST) 110'-8" 08.59 07.14 07.14 08.58 04.01 14.8 15.7 16.1 17 18 19 FIRST FLOOR (EXIST) 100'-0" E F G T.O. MASONRY @ CIRC. (EXIST) 117'-4" ML SILL (EXIST) 103'-4" ML HEAD (EXIST) 110'-8" 07.05 07.14 04.01 08.04 08.58 FIRST FLOOR (EXIST) 100'-0" 141516 T.O. MASONRY @ CIRC. (EXIST) 117'-4" ML SILL (EXIST) 103'-4" ML HEAD (EXIST) 110'-8" 07.1407.14 08.59 04.0104.01 08.58 09.07 14.815.716.1171819 FIRST FLOOR (EXIST) 100'-0" SECOND FLOOR (EXIST) 114'-10" 141516 T.O. MASONRY @ CIRC. (EXIST) 117'-4" T.O. CMU TOWER (EXIST) 135'-4" ML HEAD (EXIST) 110'-8" 08.04 09.07 14.815.716.117 FIRST FLOOR (EXIST) 100'-0" SECOND FLOOR (EXIST) 114'-10" E F G T.O. MASONRY @ CIRC. (EXIST) 117'-4" F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN Check: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 501 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 krausanderson.com | 612 332 7281 3/18/2022 10:20:59 AMBIM 360://Oneka Elementary School Addition and Renovation/192233_Oneka ES Addition and Renovations -Central.rvt1/8" = 1'-0"Central: BIM 360://Oneka Elementary School Addition and Renovation/192233_Oneka ES Addition and Renovations- Central.rvt A5.101 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY SUBMITTAL 03.04.2022 TME MF 04/15/22 192233 Minnesota 04/15/2022 Paul Aplikowski 42737 ARCHITECT ONEKA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITION AND RENOVATION 4888 Heritage Parkway N. Hugo, Minnesota 55038 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #624 4855 Bloom Ave White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 0 1/8" = 1'-0" AREA 'B' - WEST ELEVATIONB1 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" AREA 'B' - SOUTH ELEVATIONF5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" AREA 'B' - EAST ELEVATIONB5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" AREA 'B' - EAST ELEVATIOND5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" AREA 'B' - SOUTH ELEVATIONF1 6' 12' MATERIALS KEY KEY MATERIAL 04.01 BRICK 1 07.05 ASPHALT SHINGLES 07.14 VINYL SOFFIT OR FASCIA 08.04 ANODIZED ALUMINUM DOOR 08.58 EXTERIOR GLAZING 08.59 PREFINISHED METAL LOUVER 09.07 GYPSUM BOARD Revisions Description Date Num ONEKA ELEMENTARYWWWWWNEW BUILDING ADDITIONFFE: 926.10 (ARCH 100' 00")14 ADDITIONAL FUTUREPARKING STALLS1142A2A3333118'(TYP.)9'(TYP.)12'10'8'8'8'8'8'6' 8'R3'R 3 'R10'R10' R 1 0 ' R4'R4'R17'R10'R10'R12'R12'R10'R6'R14'3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comC 2021 Larson Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.P:\Projects\Projects - 2021\12216147 - Oneka Elem Addition & Renovation - Wold\C. Design\Drawing Files\12216147 - C200 Paving.dwg 3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comLarsonEngineering, Inc.0NORTH153060FEDCBA12345678MNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:Scale:Greg A. Buchal, P.E.Date: Lic. No.:03.25.202223793I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the state of Minnesota.GABMTH03.25.202212216147RevisionsDescriptionDateNum03.25.2022 CD SET3/24/2022 10:22:59 AM INDEPENDENT SCHOOLDISTRICT #624Oneka ElementarySchool Addition andRenovation4855 Bloom AvenueWhite Bear Lake, MN 551104888 Heritage Pkwy NorthHugo, MN 55038C200PAVING PLANSYMBOL LEGENDNEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSEE DETAIL 1/C700NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENTSEE DETAIL 2/C700NEW STOOPSEE STRUCTURALPAVEMENT MARKINGSNO PARKINGKEY NOTES1NEW S518 CONCRETE CURB, SEE DETAIL 8/C700NEW ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP_A:TYPE 1, SEE DETAIL 9/C700TRANSITION CURBNEW CURB CUT, SEE DETAIL 3/C7002_3EXISTING WETLAND EDGENEW WETLAND EDGEPAVING NOTES1.Concrete joints are shown for general reference only to signify newlight-duty and/or heavy-duty concrete pavement. Actual joints shall beconstructed per the project specifications.4SITE NOTESNew Building Impervious: 9,037 SFSite Improvements New/Reconstructed Impervious: 7,562Accounted Future Impervious for parking stall addition: 2,742 SFTotal New/Reconstructed Impervious: 19,341 SF ONEKA ELEMENTARYONEK A P A R K W A Y N W W Drainage & Utility Easement per plat of WATERS EDGEDrainage & Utility Easement per plat of WATERS EDGEPonding & Flowage Easement over all of Drainage &Utility Easement of Outlot A, WATERS EDGE per Doc.No. 596408 & 3482732Ponding & Flowage Easement over all of Drainage &Utility Easement of Outlot A, WATERS EDGE per Doc.No. 596408 & 3482732W W W W E T L A N D TBOTTOM = 917.00PERMANENT POOL = 920.50100 YR HWL = 921.60EOF = 922.30MEASURED ELEV. 11/03/21 = 920.78MEASURED ELEV. 02/21/22 = 920.44(ICE)P O N D 4BOTTOM = 915.00PERMANENT POOL = 918.50100 YR HWL = 920.30MEASURED ELEV. 11/03/21 = 919.11MEASURED ELEV. 02/21/22 = 918.37(ICE)P O N D 3Wetland Delineationper Kjolhaug Environmental Services Inc.Nov. 2021(typical)NEW BUILDING ADDITIONFFE: 926.10 (ARCH 100' 00")14 ADDITIONAL FUTUREPARKING STALLS3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comC 2021 Larson Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.P:\Projects\Projects - 2021\12216147 - Oneka Elem Addition & Renovation - Wold\C. Design\Drawing Files\12216147 - C600 - Landscape.dwg3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comLarsonEngineering, Inc.0NORTH153060FEDCBA12345678MNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:Scale:Greg A. Buchal, P.E.Date: Lic. No.:03.25.202223793I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the state of Minnesota.GABMTH03.25.202212216147RevisionsDescriptionDateNum03.25.2022 CD SET3/24/2022 10:22:37 AMINDEPENDENT SCHOOLDISTRICT #624Oneka ElementarySchool Addition andRenovation4855 Bloom AvenueWhite Bear Lake, MN 551104888 Heritage Pkwy NorthHugo, MN 55038C600LANDSCAPEPLANSYMBOL LEGENDLANDSCAPING NOTESINFILTRATION AREA, MNDOT SEED MIX 33-261NEW SOD1.Landscape Contractor is responsible for coordination with the General Contractor, to protect the newimprovements on and off-site during landscape work activities. Report any damage to the GeneralContractor immediately.2.Plant size and species substitutions must be approved in writing prior to acceptance in the field.3.Landscape Contractor is responsible for ongoing maintenance of all newly installed material until time ofowner acceptance. Any acts of vandalism or damage which may occur prior to owner acceptance shall bethe responsibility of the contractor. Contractor shall provide the owner with a maintenance programincluding, but not limited to, pruning, fertilization and disease/pest control.4.Landscape Contractor shall provide the owner with a watering schedule appropriate to the project siteconditions and to plant material growth requirements.5.Landscape Contractor shall guarantee newly planted material through one calendar year from the date ofwritten owner acceptance. Plants that exhibit more than 10% die-back damage shall be replaced at noadditional cost to the owner. The contractor shall also provide adequate tree wrap and deer/rodentprotection measures for the plantings during the warranty period.6.Planting areas shall be edged with 6" black vinyl edging and have 4" colored hardwood wood mulch over aweed barrier fabric.7.All trees not planted in landscaped areas shall have shredded hardwood mulch placed around the tree at 4'diameter and 6" deep.8.Restore all disturbed turf areas with 6" of good quality topsoil and seed unless otherwise specified.Autumn Blaze White AshFraxinus Amerucana'Autumn Blaze'2-1/2" CalB & BPLANTING SCHEDULEAmur CherryPrunus Maackii2-1/2" CalB & B2-1/2" CalB & BPrairifire CrabapppleMalus X 'Prairifire'COMMON NAMEBOTANICAL NAMESIZECONTAINERQTY864OVERSTORY TREES, SEE DETAIL 6/C700--- FIRST FLOOR (EXIST) 100'-0" 14 15 16 T.O. MASONRY @ CIRC. (EXIST) 117'-4" ML SILL (EXIST) 103'-4" ML HEAD (EXIST) 110'-8" 08.59 07.14 07.14 08.58 04.0114.8 15.7 16.1 17 18 19 07.38 07.38 08.59 FIRST FLOOR (EXIST) 100'-0" E F G T.O. MASONRY @ CIRC. (EXIST) 117'-4" ML SILL (EXIST) 103'-4" ML HEAD (EXIST) 110'-8" 07.05 07.14 04.01 08.04 08.58 FIRST FLOOR (EXIST) 100'-0" 141516 T.O. MASONRY @ CIRC. (EXIST) 117'-4" ML SILL (EXIST) 103'-4" ML HEAD (EXIST) 110'-8" 07.1408.59 08.59 04.0104.01 08.58 04.01 14.8 15.716.1171819 FIRST FLOOR (EXIST) 100'-0" SECOND FLOOR (EXIST) 114'-10" 141516 T.O. MASONRY @ CIRC. (EXIST) 117'-4" T.O. CMU TOWER (EXIST) 135'-4" ML HEAD (EXIST) 110'-8" 08.04 14.8 15.716.117 FIRST FLOOR (EXIST) 100'-0" SECOND FLOOR (EXIST) 114'-10" E F G T.O. MASONRY @ CIRC. (EXIST) 117'-4" 07.05 07.1404.01 05.07 F E D C B A 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 A MN Check: Drawn: Date: Comm: License Number: I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed under the laws of the State of Scale: Date 501 South Eighth Street Minneapolis, MN 55404 krausanderson.com | 612 332 7281 3/23/2022 10:03:55 PMBIM 360://Oneka Elementary School Addition and Renovation/192233_Oneka ES Addition and Renovations -Central.rvt1/8" = 1'-0"Central: BIM 360://Oneka Elementary School Addition and Renovation/192233_Oneka ES Addition and Renovations- Central.rvt A5.101 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION CITY SUBMITTAL 3.4.2022 TME MF 04/15/22 192233 Minnesota 04/15/2022 Paul Aplikowski 42737 ARCHITECT ONEKA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL ADDITION AND RENOVATION 4888 Heritage Parkway N. Hugo, Minnesota 55038 INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT #624 4855 Bloom Ave White Bear Lake, Minnesota 55110 0 1/8" = 1'-0" AREA 'B' - WEST ELEVATIONB1 6'12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" AREA 'B' - SOUTH ELEVATIONF5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" AREA 'B' - EAST ELEVATIONB5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" AREA 'B' - EAST ELEVATIOND5 6' 12' 0 1/8" = 1'-0" AREA 'B' - SOUTH ELEVATIONF1 6' 12' MATERIALS KEY KEY MATERIAL 04.01 BRICK 1 05.07 MISC METAL 07.05 ASPHALT SHINGLES 07.14 VINYL SOFFIT OR FASCIA 07.38 PREFINISHED ALUMINUM COPING 08.04 ANODIZED ALUMINUM DOOR 08.58 EXTERIOR GLAZING 08.59 PREFINISHED METAL LOUVER Revisions Description Date Num GENERAL NOTES -PLUMBINGA. COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF ALL NEW PIPING WITH STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS AND ALL NEW DUCTWORK, CEILINGS, LIGHTS, ETC.B. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS ON REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL CHASES, WALLS, FURROUTS, ETC. REQUIRED FOR DUCTWORK AND PIPING.C. PROVIDE ISOLATION VALVES AT EVERY BRANCH TAKE-OFF FROM MAINS. LOCATE VALVES NEXT TO MAIN WITH HANDLES EASILY ACCESSIBLE.D. REFER TO RISER DIAGRAMS AND DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL VALVES AND SIZES.E. REFER TO PLUMBING FIXTURE ROUGH-IN AND FLOOR DRAIN SCHEDULES FOR PIPE SIZES TO INDIVIDUAL FIXTURES.F. PITCH ALL UNDERFLOOR SANITARY PIPING AT 1/4" PER FOOT (MIN.) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.G. PITCH ALL RAINWATER PIPING AT 1/8" PER FOOT (MIN.) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.H. PROVIDE ALL EXPOSED PIPES WITH A FINISH SUITABLE AND READY FOR FIELD PAINTING.I. INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND HORIZONTAL PIPING AS HIGH AS POSSIBLE UP TIGHT TO STRUCTURE.J. IDENTIFY ANY INSULATION, FITTINGS, TILE, PLASTER, ETC., WHICH MAY CONTAIN ASBESTOS AND NOTIFY OWNER. OWNER SHALL REMOVE ASBESTOS UNDER A SEPARATE CONTRACT.K. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS, PIPING, DUCT LOCATIONS, SIZES, ETC.L. REMOVE AND REINSTALL ALL EXISTING CEILING SYSTEMS REQUIRED FOR NEW DUCT SYSTEMS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.M. REMOVE AND REROUTE ANY EXISTING PIPING REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW EQUIPMENT, DUCTS, PIPES, DIFFUSERS, LIGHTS, ETC. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.N. EXISTING MECHANICAL DRAWINGS ARE AVAILABLE FOR CONTRACTOR'S REVIEW AND INSPECTION. CALL TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS.O. PROVIDE CLEANOUT AT CONNECTIONS TO ALL EXISTING WASTE, VENT, AND RAINWATER SYSTEMS, EVERY 50' FOR SANITARY AND RAINWATER PIPES LESS THAN 3", EVERY 100' FOR SANITARY AND RAINWATER PIPES 3" AND LARGER, AND AT THE BASE OF ALL SANITARY AND RAINWATER RISERS.XSINKXRW3456789101112GFEDx10x9.2P5ORWXORWXRWVVXRWORWXRW5"83/4"1 1/2"3/4"83XSINK33/4"1 1/2"1"81 1/4"3/4"1"86" RW(3400 SF)5"84" XORW UP TO XORD(3400 SF)19XRD2110XRD74" ORW(1200 SF)4" XORW UP TO XORD(1200 SF)4" XORW UP (800 SF)1124"8(2) XUR3(2) XWC3XWB3(4) XWC3XLAV3XWC3XMOP33456789101112EDx10x9.2P5XSINKP55"3/4"1 1/2"3/4"5"ORWXRWXRW883181754VV1 1/2"3/4"1 1/2"1/2"86710FEDCBA12345678AMNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:License Number:I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.Scale:DateProfessional Engineer3/22/20224855 Bloom AveWhite Bear Lake, MN 551103/22/2022 1:29:55 PMBIM 360://Oneka Elementary School Addition and Renovation/M21_Oneka ES_Central_kweinzierl.rvt1/8" = 1'-0"INDEPENDENT SCHOOLDISTRICT #624ONEKAELEMENTARYSCHOOL ADDITIONAND RENOVATIONM2.01aMAIN LEVELPLUMBING PLAN -AREA A4888 HERITAGE PKWY NORTHHUGO, MN 55038SITE PLAN APPLICATION -NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONKEWKEW3/22/2022R20-4013.000KEITH E. WEINZIERL41638KEYNOTES1 PROVIDE CO AT CONNECTION TO EXISTING WASTE AND/OR VENTSYSTEM.2 CAP PIPE(S) HERE.3 PLUMBING FIXTURE SHALL REMAIN.4 CONNECT NEW SINK ROUGH-IN TO XSINK ROUGH-IN.5 WALL SAWCUT AND PATCHED BY OTHERS. REFER TOARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.6 FCO.7 PROVIDE WCO IN SAN UNDER PLUMBING FIXTURE.8 PIPE SHALL REMAIN AS EXISTING.9 CONNECT NEW ORWL TO XORD.10 CONNECT NEW VENT TO XVTR.1/8" = 1'-0"MAIN LEVEL PLUMBING PLAN - AREA A BASE BID11/8" = 1'-0"MAIN LEVEL PLUMBING PLAN - AREA A ALTERNATE 12RevisionsDescription Date Num GENERAL NOTES -PLUMBINGA. COORDINATE INSTALLATION OF ALL NEW PIPING WITH STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS AND ALL NEW DUCTWORK, CEILINGS, LIGHTS, ETC.B. COORDINATE WITH ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS ON REQUIREMENTS FOR ALL CHASES, WALLS, FURROUTS, ETC. REQUIRED FOR DUCTWORK AND PIPING.C. PROVIDE ISOLATION VALVES AT EVERY BRANCH TAKE-OFF FROM MAINS. LOCATE VALVES NEXT TO MAIN WITH HANDLES EASILY ACCESSIBLE.D. REFER TO RISER DIAGRAMS AND DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL VALVES AND SIZES.E. REFER TO PLUMBING FIXTURE ROUGH-IN AND FLOOR DRAIN SCHEDULES FOR PIPE SIZES TO INDIVIDUAL FIXTURES.F. PITCH ALL UNDERFLOOR SANITARY PIPING AT 1/4" PER FOOT (MIN.) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.G. PITCH ALL RAINWATER PIPING AT 1/8" PER FOOT (MIN.) UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.H. PROVIDE ALL EXPOSED PIPES WITH A FINISH SUITABLE AND READY FOR FIELD PAINTING.I. INSTALL ALL EQUIPMENT AND HORIZONTAL PIPING AS HIGH AS POSSIBLE UP TIGHT TO STRUCTURE.J. IDENTIFY ANY INSULATION, FITTINGS, TILE, PLASTER, ETC., WHICH MAY CONTAIN ASBESTOS AND NOTIFY OWNER. OWNER SHALL REMOVE ASBESTOS UNDER A SEPARATE CONTRACT.K. FIELD VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS, PIPING, DUCT LOCATIONS, SIZES, ETC.L. REMOVE AND REINSTALL ALL EXISTING CEILING SYSTEMS REQUIRED FOR NEW DUCT SYSTEMS UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.M. REMOVE AND REROUTE ANY EXISTING PIPING REQUIRED FOR INSTALLATION OF NEW EQUIPMENT, DUCTS, PIPES, DIFFUSERS, LIGHTS, ETC. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE ON ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.N. EXISTING MECHANICAL DRAWINGS ARE AVAILABLE FOR CONTRACTOR'S REVIEW AND INSPECTION. CALL TO MAKE ARRANGEMENTS.O. PROVIDE CLEANOUT AT CONNECTIONS TO ALL EXISTING WASTE, VENT, AND RAINWATER SYSTEMS, EVERY 50' FOR SANITARY AND RAINWATER PIPES LESS THAN 3", EVERY 100' FOR SANITARY AND RAINWATER PIPES 3" AND LARGER, AND AT THE BASE OF ALL SANITARY AND RAINWATER RISERS.P10P2P3P8P1P1P21 1/4"3/4"2"3/4"2 1/2"1 1/4"1 1/4"1"ORWORW1213151617GFE4" UP TO ORD(2700 SF)4" UP TO RD(2700 SF)4" UP TO RD(1900 SF)4" UP TO ORD(1900 SF)4" UP TO RD(1700 SF)4" UP TO ORD(1700 SF)4" UP TO ORD(1900 SF)4" UP TO RD(1900 SF)4" UP TO ORD(2700 SF)4" UP TO RD(2700 SF)RWRWRWRWORW6" ORWL(2700 SF)6" RWL(2700 SF)8" RWL(4600 SF)5" RWL(1700 SF)8" RWL(6300 SF)8" RWL @ 1/4"/FT(10900 SF)8" RWL(4600 SF)5" RWL(1900 SF)4" RWL @ 1/4"/FT(1900 SF)6" RWL(2700 SF)8" ORWL @ 1/4"/FT(10000 SF)6" ORWL @ 1/4"/FT(5400 SF)6" ORWL(4600 SF)4" @ 1/4"/FT(1900 SF)6" ORWL(3600 SF)6" @ 1/2"/FT(6300 SF)ORWORW1"2"SANVVV2"2"2"F1F1F1F134111111P68287445612834P111681311149111110109222811834B115CLASSROOMB114CLASSROOMB113CLASSROOMB100CIRCULATIONB111CLASSROOMB112CLASSROOMB110FLEX ROOMB109FLEX ROOMB108FLEX ROOMB116SMALL GROUPB107VESTIBULEB101TOILETB103TOILETB104TOILETB105TOILETB106MECH / ELECA106READING AREA41515171213151617GFEP4P4P4P4P4P10P81 1/4"3/4"2"3/4"2"2 1/2"1 1/4"1 1/4"1"ORWORW6"VP6B115CLASSROOMB114CLASSROOMB113CLASSROOMB100CIRCULATIONB111CLASSROOMB112CLASSROOMB110FLEX ROOMB109FLEX ROOMB108FLEX ROOMB116SMALL GROUPB107VESTIBULEB101TOILETB103TOILETB104TOILETB105TOILETB106MECH / ELECA106READING AREA4" UP TO ORD(2700 SF)4" UP TO RD(2700 SF)4" UP TO RD(1900 SF)4" UP TO ORD(1900 SF)4" UP TO RD(1700 SF)4" UP TO ORD(1700 SF)4" UP TO ORD(1900 SF)4" UP TO RD(1900 SF)4" UP TO ORD(2700 SF)4" UP TO RD(2700 SF)6" ORWL(2700 SF)6" RWL(2700 SF)8" RWL(4600 SF)5" RWL(1700 SF)8" RWL(6300 SF)8" RWL @ 1/4"/FT(10900 SF)8" RWL(4600 SF)5" RWL(1900 SF)4" RWL @ 1/4"/FT(1900 SF)6" RWL(2700 SF)8" ORWL @ 1/4"/FT(10000 SF)6" ORWL @ 1/4"/FT(5400 SF)6" ORWL(4600 SF)4" @ 1/4"/FT(1900 SF)6" ORWL(3600 SF)6" @ 1/2"/FT(6300 SF)ORWORWRWRWRWRWORWORWORWSANVVVORWORWRWRWRWRWORWORWORWSANVVV3411111182874456128341681311149111010922281183411822VVVV111111113/4"3/4"1 1/2"1/2"1/2"1 1/2"P11P2P3P1P1P2F1F1F1F1114151517FEDCBA12345678AMNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:License Number:I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.Scale:DateProfessional Engineer3/22/20224855 Bloom AveWhite Bear Lake, MN 551103/22/2022 1:30:03 PMBIM 360://Oneka Elementary School Addition and Renovation/M21_Oneka ES_Central_kweinzierl.rvt1/8" = 1'-0"INDEPENDENT SCHOOLDISTRICT #624ONEKAELEMENTARYSCHOOL ADDITIONAND RENOVATIONM2.01bMAIN LEVELPLUMBING PLAN -AREA B4888 HERITAGE PKWY NORTHHUGO, MN 55038SITE PLAN APPLICATION -NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONKEWKEW3/22/2022R20-4013.000KEITH E. WEINZIERL41638KEYNOTES1 RD/ORD SAHLL CONFORM TO ICC 500 STORM SHELTERREQUIREMENTS.2 2" VENT UP TO 2" VTR. VTR SHALL CONFORM TO ICC 500 STORMSHELTER REQUIREMENTS.3 PROVIDE LINE SIZE RWL/ORWL NOZZLE. INSTALL NOZZLE 1'-6" A.F.F.4 PROVIDE PIPE PENETRATION SHROUD. SHROUD SHALL CONFORMTO ICC 500 STORM SHELTER REQUIREMENTS.5 3" SAN UP TO F2.6 2" VENT UP.7 3" SAN DOWN. WCO.8 FCO.9 4" SAN DOWN.10 PROVIDE VALVED SHOCK ABSORBER. LOCATE IN ADJACENT,ACCESSIBLE CEILING.11 PROVIDE WCO IN SAN UNDER PLUMBING FIXTURE.12 PROVIDE STOP AND WASTE VALVE IN SUPPLY SERVING FIXTURE.13 3/4" CW UP TO P9.14 1/2" CBV. BALANCE TO 1 GPM.15 CONNECT HORIZONTAL RW/ORW PIPE TOGETHER TO THE VERTICALRW/ORW LEADER.16 PROVIDE STOP AND CHECK VALVES IN SUPPLIES SERVING FIXTURE.17 RWL NOZZLE TO DISCHARGE INTO STORM CATCH BASIN. CATCHBASIN BY OTHERS. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS.1/8" = 1'-0"MAIN LEVEL PLUMBING PLAN - AREA B BASE BID11/8" = 1'-0"MAIN LEVEL PLUMBING PLAN - AREA B ALTERNATE 22RevisionsDescription Date Num GENERAL NOTES -ROOF PLANA. ALL EQUIPMENT SHALL BE INSTALLED IN COMPLIANCE WITH MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS AND TO ENSURE MANUFACTURERS MINIMUM RECOMMENDED CLEARANCES ARE MAINTAINED.B. PROVIDE ROOF CUBS FOR ALL EQUIPMENT. CURBS FLASHED TO ROOF BY OTHERS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS REFER TO SCHEDULES AND DETAILS.C. ALL EQUIPMENT AND SENSORS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM DAMAGE AND CONTAMINATION DURING CONSTRUCTION.D. PROVIDE PAINTING OF ALL PIPING EXPOSED ON ROOF AND EXTERIOR OF BUILDING. THIS INCLUDES ALL NATURAL GAS PIPING AND REFRIGERANT PIPING ON ROOF AND NATURAL GAS PIPING ROUTED UP EXTERIOR OF BUILDING. PIPING ROUTED UP EXTERIOR WALL IS TO MATCH THE COLOR OF THE EXTERIOR WALL. PROVIDE (2) COATS OF UV INHIBITIVE ENAMEL PAINT.E. PROVIDE WATERTIGHT TEMPORARY CAPS OVER ALL ROOF OPENINGS TO PREVENT WATER DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. COORDINATE WITH ALL OTHER TRADES.F. PROVIDE ALL COUNTER-FLASHING FOR ALL PIPE, DUCT, AND EQUIPMENT CURBS.G. PROVIDE ALL COUNTER-FLASHING CAPS FOR ALL PLUMBING VENTS.RH3RH4RH5RH6RH7RH8RH1RH2121314.81515.71617G.8GF.6FE.6E4" ORDROOF: 2500 SFWALL: 200 SFTOTAL: 2700 SF4" RDROOF: 2500 SFWALL: 200 SFTOTAL: 2700 SF4" RDROOF: 1700 SFWALL: 200 SFTOTAL: 1900 SF4" ORDROOF: 1700 SFWALL: 200 SFTOTAL: 1900 SF4" RDROOF: 1300 SFWALL: 400 SFTOTAL: 1700 SF4" ORDROOF: 1300 SFWALL: 400 SFTOTAL: 1700 SF4" ORDROOF: 1700 SFWALL: 200 SFTOTAL: 1900 SF4" RDROOF: 1700 SFWALL: 200 SFTOTAL: 1900 SF4" ORDROOF: 2400 SFWALL: 300 SFTOTAL: 2700 SF4" RDROOF: 2400 SFWALL: 300 SFTOTAL: 2700 SF2213535221112235221111333224FEDCBA12345678AMNNorthCheck:Drawn:Date:Comm:License Number:I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensedunder the laws of the State of Minnesota.Scale:DateProfessional Engineer3/22/20224855 Bloom AveWhite Bear Lake, MN 551103/22/2022 1:30:09 PMBIM 360://Oneka Elementary School Addition and Renovation/M21_Oneka ES_Central_kweinzierl.rvt1/8" = 1'-0"INDEPENDENT SCHOOLDISTRICT #624ONEKAELEMENTARYSCHOOL ADDITIONAND RENOVATIONM6.01ROOF PLAN -AREA B4888 HERITAGE PKWY NORTHHUGO, MN 55038SITE PLAN APPLICATION -NOT FORCONSTRUCTIONKEWKEW3/22/2022R20-4013.000KEITH E. WEINZIERL41638KEYNOTES1 ROOF CURB PROVIDED BY DIV. 23 AND FLASHED TO ROOF BYOTHERS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. RD/ORD SHALLCONFORM TO ICC 500 STORM SHELTER REQURIEMENTS.2 RD/ORD PROVIDED BY DIV. 22 AND FLASHED TO ROOF BY OTHERS.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. RD/ORD SHALL CONFORMTO ICC 500 STORM SHELTER REQURIEMENTS.3 2" VTR PROVIDED BY DIV. 22 AND FLASHED TO ROOF BY OTHERS.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS. VTR SHALL CONFORM TOICC 500 STORM SHELTER REQURIEMENTS.4 4" VTR PROVIDED BY DIV. 22 AND FLASHED TO ROOF BY OTHERS.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS.5 BASE BID: NO WORK. ALT. 2: PROVIDE WORK AS SHOWN.1/8" = 1'-0"ROOF PLAN - AREA B1RevisionsDescription Date Num Agenda Number: G.10 CITY OF HUGO PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Benjamin and Michelle Rogers – Encroachment agreement to allow a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 13123 Fondant Trail North. DATE: May 12, 2022 for the City Council meeting of May 16, 2022 ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD) LAND USE: Low Density Residential (LD) 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: July 5, 2022 1.DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant has requested an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 13123 Fondant Trail North. The Senior Engineering Technician has reviewed the location of the fence and is comfortable with the request. 2.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed the request and recommends that the City Council approve the encroachment agreement for Benjamin and Michelle Rogers, for property located at 13123 Fondant Trail North. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Encroachment Agreement Resolution 3.Encroachment Agreement 4. Survey Fondant Trail North 131st Street North Encroachment Agreement 13123 Fondant Trail North Location Map Hugo, MN Site Right of Way Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary Document Path: S:\Mapping\Emily\LocationSite Maps\2022\Rogers Encroachment Agreement.mxdSite RESOLUTION 2022-____ APPROVING AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR MICHELE BROUSE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A FENCE WITHIN A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13123 FONDANT TRAIL NORTH WHEREAS, an application has been filed by Benjamin and Michelle Rogers that requests approval of an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on the property located at 13123 Fondant Trail North, legally described as follows; Lot 3, Block 2, Adelaide Lan ding 3rd Addition, Washington County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the City Council has fully considered the request for the encroachment agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the encroachment agreement for Benjamin and Michelle Rogers on property located at 13123 Fondant Trail North. ADOPTED by the City Council this 16th day of May, 2022. ________________________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made this 16th day of May, 2022 by and between the CITY OF HUGO, a Minnesota municipality (hereinafter “City”) and, Benjamin and Michelle Rogers (hereinafter “Owners”), and their successors in title. WHEREAS, the City has an easement for drainage and utility purposes (the “Easement”) along the northerly, westerly, and southerly portion of the Owner’s property, which is legally described as: Lot 3, Block 2, ADELAIDE LANDING 3rd ADDITION, Washington County, Minnesota; and, WHEREAS, Owner is desirous of constructing a fence partially within the easement area; and, WHERAS, the City will permit the placement of a fence in the area described herein subject to the terms and conditions hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is acknowledged, the City will permit the encroachment on its easement as set forth herein and subject to the conditions set forth below: 1. Owner and their successors in title may install and maintain a fence within the Easement, and the fence shall be constructed in accordance with the plans on file with the City of Hugo. 2. No plantings, trees, permanent improvements or structures other than the fence may be maintained or placed in the easement area. 3. Owner shall maintain the fence in good repair and shall not permit it to be expanded, lengthened or to impair the City’s easement or its rights thereunder in any respect. 4. The encroachment granted to Owner herein is subject to the existing easement rights of the City as granted in various easements. 5. The City will notify Owner if it requires removal or relocation of the fence or any part of it. Thereafter, Owner shall remove the fence according to the direction of the City and if Owner fails to do so, the City may enter upon the land and remove as much of the fence as required and cast it upon the adjoining lands. In such an event, the City shall not be liable to Owner for any costs, loss or damage whatsoever, and may assess the property for all of its costs incurred in removing the fence, and Owner waive all formalities, requirements and defenses arising from or relating to Minnesota Statutes Section 429 relating to or arising from the work done by the City. 6. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Owner agrees to release, defend, protect, indemnify, save and hold harmless the City, its agents, directors, employees, shareholders and contractors against any and all claims, costs and liabilities, including the costs of defense for damages, injury or death arising from or in any way connected to the installation, maintenance, repair, removal and/or presence of the fence, regardless of whether such harm is to Owner, the City, the employees or officers, guests or invitees of either or any other person or entity, except Owner shall not be liable under this paragraph for loss or damage to the extent resulting from the negligence of the indemnified parties. 7. The permission granted herein is limited exclusively to the proposed fence within the specified portion of the easement area of the City’s Easement. Owner shall not alter the grade or permit such alteration anywhere upon the land upon which the City has reserved its easement rights without proper express written consent of the City. 8. Owner shall, at all times, use their best efforts to conduct all of their activities on said Easement in such a manner as to not interfere with or impede the operation of the City’s Easement and related activities in any manner whatsoever, and shall follow the direction of the City. 9. This Agreement shall run with the land and inure to the benefit and be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, successors and assigns. 10. Owner shall be responsible for the costs of recording this Agreement with the Washington County Recorder. WHEREUPON, the parties have set their hands this day of , 2022. CITY OF HUGO By By Tom Weidt, Mayor Michele Lindau, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this _____ day of __________________, 2022, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared TOM WEIDT and MICHELE LINDAU, of the City of Hugo, a Minnesota municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Hugo by the authority of the City Council of the City of Hugo, and TOM WEIDT and MICHELE LINDAU acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City of Hugo. __________________________________________ Notary Public Benjamin Rogers, Owner _____________________________________ Michelle Rogers, Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. (Individual Notary) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this _____ day of __________________, 2022, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Benjamin and Michelle Rogers, husband and wife, who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be his free act and deed. __________________________________________ Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: David K. Snyder Johnson & Turner, P.A. 56 East Broadway Avenue, Suite 206 Forest Lake, MN 55025 (651) 464-7292 Certificate of Survey for: Revisions: 1 Restoke per Client - 6 9 21 N 3 CREATIVE HOMES, INC. 5 House Address: 13123 Fondant Trail North, Hugo, MN House Model: Bayfield T A I o i° °&T C)// L det co No se 6 yy 9 lJ `5k' 0Jed g33 0 0 TT° 90° Epp 0 94-53 00 0 A BENCHMARK 0 L 25 93' / / x93 —•36 AF Sy3 3 A o110rn10 3 936j / o?oo 0 SA9v orn 1 93 O 16 10``\``` 0 0 0 9R Lo 940.8 p v51 10.00y m0 ` \` 10' Wide Pond TC o o s £o Access Route O O .r LQ per Grading PlanG; mac^7 m FO o e 9 0 Q OB G S y0 4_ Drainage and F 4 Utility Easement 9 O O\ a^ p 33 om o o v po• C7 9TC40.7\\ \ O N1 Na t" oo£0 937 0 H^, QO „ g3 aPrY y t 00 0 SS p^a 1o45594 co N c 1 5p 5 ro T ^ 5CIV O co y x 936.0 y• F ^y I T40.41 0 I OINp n ' 0 941 g\ 5 940.5 10N \ 940.2 I TC 6 o o 2 xg4 34.19L Cp rn 940.3 94980.9 940.7 02 0 7p g4j6 89°24'26"W0 TCO oo g4 2 941.2 940.1 — 1 J CBTC 86 1 940.6 Si I TIC I I — ---- 940.9 r7 i i BENCHMARK SETBACKS TOP OF SPIKE Front:25 ft. EL = 940.75 Side(House):---........10 ft. Side(Garage): 10ft. Rear: 30 ft. Side (Corner Lot):----25 ft. Ft Total Lot Area......... ..... . ...17,657 sq.ft. House and Porches Area f4,296 sq.ft. 7x a Driveway Area to Right of Way Line - f 1,390 sq.ft. Sidewalk Area .............................._....._...........±114 sq.ft. Pool Apron Area.................................................t396 sq.ft. Total Impervious f6,455 sq.ft. HYD Total Impervious Coverage.......................................f36.6% Denotes Existing Hydrant Total Sod Area to Back of Curb t12,516 sq.ft. EB Total Driveway Area to Back of Curb f1,655 s ft.Denotes Existing Electric Box q• n Denotes Existing Television Box 0 Denotes Existing Telephone Box PROPERTY DESCRIPTION: Denotes Existing Light Pole Lot 3, Block 2, ADELAIDE LANDING 3RD so Denotes Existing Service ADDITION, Washington County, Minnesota o Denotes Existing Curb Stop x 000.o Denotes Existing Elevation Minimum Lowest Floor Elevation: 935.5 900.o Denotes Proposed Elevation PROPOSED BUILDING ELEVATIONS Denotes Direction of Drainage Denotes Drainage & Utility Easement Lowest Floor Elevation: 935.5 5.per recorded plat) Top of Foundation Elevation: 944.2 4l Denotes Iron Monument Garage Slab Elevation (at door): 943.8 Bearings shown are assumed NOTES: 1. Proposed building site grading is in accordance with the GRAPHIC SCALE grading plans prepared by Westwood Professional Services, v 0 15 30 60 last revised 1/29/ 2019. 2. Contractor must verify sewer depth.o, 3. Driveways shown are for graphic purposes only. Final driveway design and location to be determined by owner/builder.IN FEET 4. All building foundation dimensions shown on this survey11x17sheetincludeexteriorfoundationinsulation widths, if applicable. T 2021 8309.010 DPE GBV Refer to final building plans for foundation details. A V n I hereby certify to Creative Homes, Inc. that this survey, plan or report was prepared by me or under my direct CARLSONENGINEERING supervision and that I am a duly licensed land surveyor under the laws of the State of Minnesota. a SURVEYING Dated this 14th day of April, 2021.M ! CA I N ENVIRONMENTAL Signed: rlson McC Inc. 0 3890 PHEASANT RIDGE DRIVE NE,SUITE 100,BLAINE,MN 55449 BY ThomasTEL763.489.7900 \ FAX 763.489.7959 \ CARLSONMCCAIN.COM PeterJ. Blomaquist, L S. Reg. No.4516676 n Fence Location Agenda Number: G.11 CITY OF HUGO PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Kevin and Rachael Venerzzo – Encroachment agreement to allow a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 13397 Fondant Trail North. DATE: May 12, 2022 for the City Council meeting of May 16, 2022 ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD) LAND USE: Low Density Residential (LD) 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: June 30, 2022 1.DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant has requested an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 13397 Fondant Trail North. The Senior Engineering Technician has reviewed the location of the fence and is comfortable with the request. 2.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed the request and recommends that the City Council approve the encroachment agreement for Kevin and Rachael Venerzzo, for property located at 13397 Fondant Trail North. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Encroachment Agreement Resolution 3.Encroachment Agreement 4. Survey Fondant Trail NorthEncroachment Agreement 13397 Fondant Trail North Location Map Hugo, MN Site Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary Document Path: S:\Mapping\Emily\LocationSite Maps\2022\Venerzzo Encroachment Agreement.mxdSite RESOLUTION 2022-____ APPROVING AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR MICHELE BROUSE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A FENCE WITHIN A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13397 FONDANT TRAIL NORTH WHEREAS, an application has been filed by Kevin and Rachael Venerzzo that requests approval of an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on the property located at 13397 Fondant Trail North, legally described as follows; Lot 13, Block 6, Adelaide Land ing 5th Addition, Washington County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the City Council has fully considered the request for the encroachment agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the encroachment agreement for Kevin and Rachael Venerzzo on property located at 13397 Fondant Trail North. ADOPTED by the City Council this 16th day of May, 2022. ________________________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made this 16th day of May, 2022 by and between the CITY OF HUGO, a Minnesota municipality (hereinafter “City”) and, Kevin and Rachael Venerzzo (hereinafter “Owners”), and their successors in title. WHEREAS, the City has an easement for drainage and utility purposes (the “Easement”) along the northerly, westerly, and southerly portion of the Owner’s property, which is legally described as: Lot 13, Block 6, ADELAIDE LANDING 5th ADDITION, Washington County, Minnesota; and, WHEREAS, Owner is desirous of constructing a fence partially within the easement area; and, WHERAS, the City will permit the placement of a fence in the area described herein subject to the terms and conditions hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is acknowledged, the City will permit the encroachment on its easement as set forth herein and subject to the conditions set forth below: 1. Owner and their successors in title may install and maintain a fence within the Easement, and the fence shall be constructed in accordance with the plans on file with the City of Hugo. 2. No plantings, trees, permanent improvements or structures other than the fence may be maintained or placed in the easement area. 3. Owner shall maintain the fence in good repair and shall not permit it to be expanded, lengthened or to impair the City’s easement or its rights thereunder in any respect. 4. The encroachment granted to Owner herein is subject to the existing easement rights of the City as granted in various easements. 5. The City will notify Owner if it requires removal or relocation of the fence or any part of it. Thereafter, Owner shall remove the fence according to the direction of the City and if Owner fails to do so, the City may enter upon the land and remove as much of the fence as required and cast it upon the adjoining lands. In such an event, the City shall not be liable to Owner for any costs, loss or damage whatsoever, and may assess the property for all of its costs incurred in removing the fence, and Owner waive all formalities, requirements and defenses arising from or relating to Minnesota Statutes Section 429 relating to or arising from the work done by the City. 6. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Owner agrees to release, defend, protect, indemnify, save and hold harmless the City, its agents, directors, employees, shareholders and contractors against any and all claims, costs and liabilities, including the costs of defense for damages, injury or death arising from or in any way connected to the installation, maintenance, repair, removal and/or presence of the fence, regardless of whether such harm is to Owner, the City, the employees or officers, guests or invitees of either or any other person or entity, except Owner shall not be liable under this paragraph for loss or damage to the extent resulting from the negligence of the indemnified parties. 7. The permission granted herein is limited exclusively to the proposed fence within the specified portion of the easement area of the City’s Easement. Owner shall not alter the grade or permit such alteration anywhere upon the land upon which the City has reserved its easement rights without proper express written consent of the City. 8. Owner shall, at all times, use their best efforts to conduct all of their activities on said Easement in such a manner as to not interfere with or impede the operation of the City’s Easement and related activities in any manner whatsoever, and shall follow the direction of the City. 9. This Agreement shall run with the land and inure to the benefit and be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, successors and assigns. 10. Owner shall be responsible for the costs of recording this Agreement with the Washington County Recorder. WHEREUPON, the parties have set their hands this day of , 2022. CITY OF HUGO By By Tom Weidt, Mayor Michele Lindau, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this _____ day of __________________, 2022, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared TOM WEIDT and MICHELE LINDAU, of the City of Hugo, a Minnesota municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Hugo by the authority of the City Council of the City of Hugo, and TOM WEIDT and MICHELE LINDAU acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City of Hugo. __________________________________________ Notary Public Kevin Venerzzo, Owner _____________________________________ Rachael Venerzzo, Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. (Individual Notary) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this _____ day of __________________, 2022, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Kevin and Rachael Venerzzo, husband and wife, who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be his free act and deed. __________________________________________ Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: David K. Snyder Johnson & Turner, P.A. 56 East Broadway Avenue, Suite 206 Forest Lake, MN 55025 (651) 464-7292 Denotes set spike O Denotes set iron monument Denotes found iron monument— Denotes proposed drainage to Denotes top of curb X900.0 Denotes existing elevation 930.0) Denotes proposed elevation 10 10 r Io° / PAP O00 A. Alil 110 Is 00, / lb APPROVED tK. Date =s 49 Bn11lisy ousio s` s The minimum lowwst floor olavat:on C J shall be three(3)feet above theTYOFNG0100YearFloodElevaticn"cr four(4)feet above the"High Ground.vater Elevation', whichever is greater. SCALE IN FEET 0 40'20 Fence Location Agenda Number: G.12 CITY OF HUGO PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Justin and Shannon Schneider – Encroachment agreement to allow a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 13455 Fondant Trail North. DATE: May 12, 2022 for the City Council meeting of May 16, 2022 ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD) LAND USE: Low Density Residential (LD) 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: June 30, 2022 1.DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant has requested an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 13455 Fondant Trail North. The Senior Engineering Technician has reviewed the location of the fence and is comfortable with the request. 2.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed the request and recommends that the City Council approve the encroachment agreement for Justin and Shannon Schneider, for property located at 13455 Fondant Trail North. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Encroachment Agreement Resolution 3.Encroachment Agreement 4. Survey Fondant Trail North13 5 t h S tr e e t No rt h Encroachment Agreement 13455 Fondant Trail North Location Map Hugo, MN Site Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary Document Path: S:\Mapping\Emily\LocationSite Maps\2022\Schneider Encroachment Agreement.mxdSite RESOLUTION 2022-____ APPROVING AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR MICHELE BROUSE TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A FENCE WITHIN A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13455 FONDANT TRAIL NORTH WHEREAS, an application has been filed by Justin and Shannon Schneider that requests approval of an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on the property located at 13455 Fondant Trail North, legally described as follows; Lot 7, Block 6, Adelaide Landing 5th Additi on, Washington County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the City Council has fully considered the request for the encroachment agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the encroachment agreement for Justin and Shannon Schneider on property located at 13455 Fondant Trail North. ADOPTED by the City Council this 16th day of May, 2022. ________________________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made this 16th day of May, 2022 by and between the CITY OF HUGO, a Minnesota municipality (hereinafter “City”) and, Justin and Shannon Schneider (hereinafter “Owners”), and their successors in title. WHEREAS, the City has an easement for drainage and utility purposes (the “Easement”) along the northerly, westerly, and southerly portion of the Owner’s property, which is legally described as: Lot 7, Block 6, ADELAIDE LANDING 5th ADDITION, Washington County, Minnesota; and, WHEREAS, Owner is desirous of constructing a fence partially within the easement area; and, WHERAS, the City will permit the placement of a fence in the area described herein subject to the terms and conditions hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is acknowledged, the City will permit the encroachment on its easement as set forth herein and subject to the conditions set forth below: 1. Owner and their successors in title may install and maintain a fence within the Easement, and the fence shall be constructed in accordance with the plans on file with the City of Hugo. 2. No plantings, trees, permanent improvements or structures other than the fence may be maintained or placed in the easement area. 3. Owner shall maintain the fence in good repair and shall not permit it to be expanded, lengthened or to impair the City’s easement or its rights thereunder in any respect. 4. The encroachment granted to Owner herein is subject to the existing easement rights of the City as granted in various easements. 5. The City will notify Owner if it requires removal or relocation of the fence or any part of it. Thereafter, Owner shall remove the fence according to the direction of the City and if Owner fails to do so, the City may enter upon the land and remove as much of the fence as required and cast it upon the adjoining lands. In such an event, the City shall not be liable to Owner for any costs, loss or damage whatsoever, and may assess the property for all of its costs incurred in removing the fence, and Owner waive all formalities, requirements and defenses arising from or relating to Minnesota Statutes Section 429 relating to or arising from the work done by the City. 6. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Owner agrees to release, defend, protect, indemnify, save and hold harmless the City, its agents, directors, employees, shareholders and contractors against any and all claims, costs and liabilities, including the costs of defense for damages, injury or death arising from or in any way connected to the installation, maintenance, repair, removal and/or presence of the fence, regardless of whether such harm is to Owner, the City, the employees or officers, guests or invitees of either or any other person or entity, except Owner shall not be liable under this paragraph for loss or damage to the extent resulting from the negligence of the indemnified parties. 7. The permission granted herein is limited exclusively to the proposed fence within the specified portion of the easement area of the City’s Easement. Owner shall not alter the grade or permit such alteration anywhere upon the land upon which the City has reserved its easement rights without proper express written consent of the City. 8. Owner shall, at all times, use their best efforts to conduct all of their activities on said Easement in such a manner as to not interfere with or impede the operation of the City’s Easement and related activities in any manner whatsoever, and shall follow the direction of the City. 9. This Agreement shall run with the land and inure to the benefit and be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, successors and assigns. 10. Owner shall be responsible for the costs of recording this Agreement with the Washington County Recorder. WHEREUPON, the parties have set their hands this day of , 2022. CITY OF HUGO By By Tom Weidt, Mayor Michele Lindau, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this _____ day of __________________, 2022, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared TOM WEIDT and MICHELE LINDAU, of the City of Hugo, a Minnesota municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Hugo by the authority of the City Council of the City of Hugo, and TOM WEIDT and MICHELE LINDAU acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City of Hugo. __________________________________________ Notary Public Justin Schneider, Owner _____________________________________ Shannon Schneider, Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. (Individual Notary) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this _____ day of __________________, 2022, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Justin and Shannon Schneider, husband and wife, who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be his free act and deed. __________________________________________ Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: David K. Snyder Johnson & Turner, P.A. 56 East Broadway Avenue, Suite 206 Forest Lake, MN 55025 (651) 464-7292 16i`A f'tt:i .:IC,k':. . <i;Ctii -.i'i:'E: J '" ^O sZ Eia61 3L' f'"` : s. W i. + :' Date . 3:: t:? a .:,'..E_.._ti'..i:v 1 u> iJ4{a?£t 34T.`:lis:``§P,"t c:.?;il`.i:.ii`c'c.'2'3 iWC::!19r W 11C 1G1f?Y'Y::v;:t"si 3'. I BYi:$ S 1S4G7d 27 ci Y o uc B r O S 8 V^v/,^ yT ' vT0940.4) ELEV._939.6 L_ L: s3s.s so.2a sa. v N81'42'36"W 1 O JN 58.13 130.00 933.3) 0 10 7 Z 939.4 h 930.5) 937.4 ad • n 930.5 W}I 55.50 oi a 41.5---------- II 4.0% I p 3 0 o w rMi X932.34 _ y_.,o Q I 1" I 10QOIa N/ o az tn p 2.r o aa I . I I I o v w~ Mi° mi I I e o /" ~ ya 3 4.5 ^ Q 10.00 I . _o ^a 3 933.4X a -- Q w NZII a X932.0 z I a 6.0 0 I ; i oQ NI1 oo ad ni -----' t Q 25.0------ f o • I O 10 I----- 42.00 rn I 10 z lo I O c - - - - - CANT ,n-o- - - - - - 9. 7 30.28 ' 58.13 p 32.9 i° 931.4I 939.9) 940.9) NH9 26 39 W 3.0 932.9) 931.4 940.OX a Y Y M N N x EHO SE 1 ^T L_V I I Z7 U> m wII I A Denotes set spike O Denotes set iron monument Denotes found iron monument Denotes proposed drainage SCALE IN FEET tc Denotes top of curb X900.0 Denotes existing elevation 0 20' 40' 930.0) Denotes proposed elevation Fence Location CITY OF HUGO PARKS COMMISSION REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Shayla Denaway, Parks Planner SUBJECT: Construction Payment Request #9 Lions Park Pavilion Schreiber Mullaney Construction DATE: May 5, 2022 for the City Council meeting of May 16, 2022 1. BACKGROUND: Please find the enclosed application for payment for the City of Hugo Lions Park Pavilion in the amount of $337,308.90. The quantities completed to date have been reviewed and agreed upon by the architect, contractor and city staff. This is the seventh payment request and the amount indicated above reflects the work certified through April 25, 2022. A 5% retainage is applied and the total retainage being held for the project to date $148,505.08. 2. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve payment request #9 in the amount of $337,308.90 to Schreiber Mullaney Construction. 337,308.9005-09-2022 EXISTINGPONDEDUCATION DR. N.HE R I TAG E PKWY . N .PROPOSED 2STORY BU ILD ING UNIT 1UNIT 2UNIT 3N1SITE PLAN1/16" = 1'-0"-ownerprojectissue datesI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly registered Architect under the laws of MinnesotaXXXXXRegistration NumberXXXdrawncheckedsheet titlesheet numbercomm. #BARBARA N. HANSONCOTTAGES AT WATER EDGEXXXXXXXXX4979 EDUCATION DR N.owner's consultantRED WING, MN 550661903 GRANDVIEW AVE.HUGO, MN 55038A100ProposedArchitecturalSite PlanHCTD- ownerprojectissue datesI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly registered Architect under the laws of MinnesotaXXXXXRegistration NumberXXXdrawncheckedsheet titlesheet numbercomm. #BARBARA N. HANSONCOTTAGES AT WATER EDGEXXXXXXXXX4979 EDUCATION DR N.owner's consultantRED WING, MN 550661903 GRANDVIEW AVE.HUGO, MN 55038A101First LevelFloor PlanHCTD-1FIRST LEVEL FLOOR PLAN3/16" = 1'-0" ownerprojectissue datesI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly registered Architect under the laws of MinnesotaXXXXXRegistration NumberXXXdrawncheckedsheet titlesheet numbercomm. #BARBARA N. HANSONCOTTAGES AT WATER EDGEXXXXXXXXX4979 EDUCATION DR N.owner's consultantRED WING, MN 550661903 GRANDVIEW AVE.HUGO, MN 55038A102Second LevelFloor PlanHCTD-1SECOND LEVEL FLOOR PLAN3/16" = 1'-0" ownerprojectissue datesI hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and that Iam a duly registered Architect under the laws of MinnesotaXXXXXRegistration NumberXXXdrawncheckedsheet titlesheet numbercomm. #BARBARA N. HANSONCOTTAGES AT WATER EDGEXXXXXXXXX4979 EDUCATION DR N.owner's consultantRED WING, MN 550661903 GRANDVIEW AVE.HUGO, MN 55038A201ExteriorElevationsHCTD-1WEST ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0"1NORTH ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0"4EAST ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0"1SOUTH ELEVATION3/16" = 1'-0" May 10, 2022 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: 2022 Oneka Parkway Improvement Project Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize the Advertisement for Bids WSB Project No. 018888-000 Dear Mayor and Council, Previously the Council had authorized staff to prepare plans and specifications for the 2022 Oneka Parkway Improvement Project. The 2022 Oneka Parkway Improvement Project consists of the following improvements along Oneka Parkway:  Bituminous mill and overlay from Frenchman Road (CSAH 8) to Farnham Avenue  Partial street reconstruction from Farnham Avenue to Heritage Parkway  Construction of a right-turn-lane northbound on Oneka Parkway at CSAH 8  Construction of a traffic signal at the intersection of Oneka Parkway and CSAH 8 Plans and Specifications have been prepared for the 2022 Oneka Parkway Improvement Project and are ready to be advertised for bidding. Staff is requesting approval of the plans and specifications for the project and authorization to advertise for bids. Staff will place the advertisement for bids which is required to run for a minimum of 21 days. Plans and Specifications are available for your review at City Hall. Consideration of awarding a construction contract will occur at a future City Council meeting. Staff recommends approval of the resolution approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for the 2022 Oneka Parkway Improvement Project. If you have any questions or items you wish to discuss, you can contact me at 612-419-3589. Sincerely, WSB Nick Guilliams, PE Senior Project Manager Attachment cc: Bryan Bear, City Administrator, City of Hugo Scott Anderson, Public Works Director, City of Hugo Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician, City of Hugo RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS 2022 ONEKA PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to direction by the Council, WSB has prepared plans and specifications for the 2022 Oneka Parkway Improvement Project and has presented such plans and specifications to the Council for approval; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO: 1. Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file at City Hall, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official City newspaper and the Finance and Commerce an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvement under such approved plans and specifications. 3. The advertisement shall be published in each of said publications at least once not less than three (3) weeks before the date set for opening bids, shall specify the work to be done, and shall state that bids will be received on-line through QuestCDN vBid™ until the date and time set for opening bids. Immediately following expiration of the time for receiving bids, representatives of the City of Hugo will publicly view at an online bid opening meeting. Any bidder whose responsibility is questioned during consideration of the bid will be given an opportunity to address the Council on the issue of responsibility. No bids will be considered unless accompanied by a bid security in an amount of 5 percent of the bidder’s maximum bid price. This resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Hugo on the 16th day of May 2022, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. ________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Premier Bank - Sketch Plan – 5615 147th Street N DATE: May 12, for the City Council meeting of May 16, 2022 ZONING: Future Central Business (FCB) COMP PLAN LAND USE: Mixed- Use (MIX) REVIEW DEADLINE: May 21, 2022 (120-days) 1.PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE: At its April 28, 2022, meeting the Planning Commission reviewed the sketch plan. Staff provided background to the Planning Commission as outlined in the staff report for the sketch plan application. The applicant presented information to the Planning Commission and stated that they are a family owned local bank, with not much traffic, and that over 90% of their business is online. They had concerns if the access was required to be on 147th Street because of security and proximity to the 147th Street and Highway 61 intersection. The Planning Commission does want to see this area develop in a way that meets the downtown plan and thinks a bank use in general is a good use for the property. Some Commissioners stated that they have been waiting for the downtown to develop for a long time, and this is a start. Some Commissioners also agreed with the applicant that the access on to Flay Avenue made sense for security and proximity to the intersection, in addition to a disruption of the trail along the north side of 147th Street. However, they did understand that commercial traffic would be accessing onto a local road and it will have an impact on the residents in the area. The Planning Commission asked about traffic counts for the bank. The applicant stated that the bank has low traffic count numbers, but planned to grow in the future and they did not know how that would affect the traffic counts, good or bad. The Planning Commission asked how the developer intends to meet the downtown design guidelines in regards to architecture and transitions between land uses. The applicant stated they have determined a design for the building, but would review the guidelines CITY OF HUGO Community Development Planning and Zoning Staff Report J.I Premier Bank - Sketch Plan 2 and intends to meet the guidelines. The applicant stated that the transitions between land uses would likely be landscaping and fencing. The Planning Commission asked staff about the rezoning of the property and what that means for the other properties in the area. Staff stated that the rezoning and CUP for a drive through would be for a commercial use and would allow all of the uses allowed in the Central Business (C-1) zoning district to locate there. The rezoning is not specific to a bank user. If this property is rezoned to C-1, the City should expect that each parcel will be developed separately and individually, rather than a master planned for development. The applicant added that it would be a large undertaking for someone to develop the entire area zoned Future Central Business (FUS) as a master development. The Planning Commission agreed that the residents in the area likely do not know that their property is zoned or how the properties could be developed. There were some concerns from the Commission on the drive through and access, and they would not like to see a fast food restaurant or other high traffic users in that location at a key entrance into downtown. The Planning Commission unanimously made a recommendation to the City Council to hold a neighborhood meeting with property owners with the zoning of Future Central Business (FUS) to discuss what their property is zoned and how the area could develop. 2. DESCRPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting informal comments on a sketch plan for a commercial development on a 0.76 acre parcel for a 4,368 square foot bank with a drive-through. The property is located on the northwest corner of 147th Street and Highway 61, currently occupied by a residential home. The property is zoned Future Central Business (FCB) and is located in the area of the City where development is guided by the downtown plan and design guidelines. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Central Business (C-1) to accommodate a commercial use. The applicant is also proposing a drive-through lane for the commercial business. 3. BACKGROUND: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The properties to the north and west are zoned Future Central Business (FCB) and are occupied by residential homes. The properties to the east across Highway 61 are zoned Central Business (C-1) and are occupied by a commercial uses. The properties to the south are zoned Future Central Business (FCB) and Central Business (C-1) and are occupied by single family homes and a commercial use. Natural Characteristics of the Site The property is currently vacant and is flat and it does not appear to have wetlands on the property. Premier Bank - Sketch Plan 3 4. SKETCH PLAN: General Layout The sketch plan shows the building generally central to the property. The access into the property is off of Flay Avenue and the parking area is located on the west side of the building. The main entrance into the building is shown on the west side. There is a drive- through lane that starts on the west side of the building and wraps around the building counter clockwise. The plan shows a canopy on the east side of the building for the drive- through. Consistency with the Downtown Plan and Design Guidelines and Ordinance Standards The City approved the downtown plan and design guidelines in April of 2007. The plan and guidelines identify the core downtown area focused along Highway 61 from County Road 8 to 147th Street, however, the plan extends north to the post office and south to 140th Street. The downtown design guidelines state that buildings in this area should be oriented to the street with fully articulated street facades (doors and windows) based on traditional downtown storefronts. The downtown plan and design guidelines shows this property as being in the core downtown central business district (CBD), but a concept is not shown on the downtown plan. The intent is that development in this area meet the downtown design guidelines in regards to building orientation, landscaping, site design, and architecture. The guidelines encourage buildings to orient to the streets and to anchor the corners at key intersections like a traditional downtown. The guidelines identify 147th and Highway 61 as a key entry point into downtown and encourages this area to be designed as a gateway into downtown. Gateway elements could include open space, unique landscaping, walls or gates, water features, and City signage. Land Use and Zoning The downtown guidelines state that “downtown development should be appropriate for a traditional downtown area” such as mixed use buildings, drug stores, banks, specialty markets, small grocers, destination retail, restaurants and entertainment, are encouraged. New auto-dominated commercial development such as fast food, auto service, and large single-use development are discouraged in the downtown. A drive-through commercial business is not necessarily pedestrian oriented, but rather automobile oriented. The property is guided as Mixed-Use (MIX) in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The MIX land use designation provides the opportunity for multiple compatible uses on a property, such as residential, commercial, entertainment, and offices uses. Specifically in the downtown area it is encouraged to have a mix of walkable commercial uses to serve the residents of the area. The development policies of the MIX land use state that small parcels should be consolidated to create large enough parcels to ensure well-planned Premier Bank - Sketch Plan 4 development occurs. The MIX land use development location criteria states that development in the area should provide transitions to adjacent land use. This is very important to this site in particular being adjacent to residential uses. The plan would need to incorporate transitions to land use with the site design, building orientation, and landscaping The zoning of the property is Future Central Business (FCB). The future central business district (FCB) represents transition areas that have been identified as practical and generally suitable for future development as part of downtown. The purpose of the future central business district is to provide a holding zone until a landowner makes application for development, at which time the city may rezone the affected property consistent with the downtown plan, provided the development does not result in the premature extension of public utilities or impede planned road improvements. Residential land uses are allowed to continue pending future redevelopment consistent with the city's downtown plan. The applicant is proposing to rezone the property to Central Business (C-1) to accommodate a commercial use. A conditional use permit will be required for the drive- through, since the drive-through would be closer than 200 feet from a residential property. There are criteria for approval that will need to be met, such as character of the area, in order approve the conditional use permit. Drive-through businesses can be disruptive and loud due to the idling of cars in the lane and the speakers from the service window. The applicant has stated that they would use landscaping as a way to minimize the impact to the surrounding residential properties, but has not shown it on the proposed plan. While staff understand landscaping can block some light from the cars headlights, it is unclear how the landscaping will reduce the noise. If the property was rezoned to C-1 and a site plan and conditional use permit was approved for a commercial business with a drive-through, any commercial business with a drive-through could locate on the property. The approval would not be specific to a bank. The proposed plan shows a stacking distance from the service window of 159 feet, where 180 feet is required by ordinance. A variance would need to be applied for and approved for the stacking distance. All of the residential properties on the cul-de-sac (Flay Avenue), including this property, are zoned Future Central Business (FCB). Prior to 2003, all of the properties were zoned commercial. The commercial zoning only allowed commercial uses, putting the residential homes in a non-conforming status. Because the residential homes were non- conforming to the zoning, the property owners could not add on to their homes, refinance, or sell their homes. There was a petition from the property owners to rezone the property to residential or another zoning district that would allow single family homes as a permitted use, so the property and homes would no longer be non-conforming. The Planning Commission and City Council considered the request and adopted the FCB zoning district that allows single family homes as a permitted use, with the thought that if commercial development were to be proposed in the area, that the property could be rezoned to a commercial zoning district. Premier Bank - Sketch Plan 5 It’s unclear in the reading the meeting minutes of the Planning Commission or the City Council, whether they imagined each parcel being rezoned individually or if they imagined the area being redeveloped into commercial all together, such as a master plan for the entire area. If this property is rezoned to C-1, the City should expect that each parcel will be developed separately and individually, rather than a master planned for development. Transitions between land uses are hard to incorporate in a plan when each parcel is developed separately or there is not a master plan for the area. Staff has not discussed this concept with the neighborhood along Flay Avenue. Staff is also unsure if the neighborhood is aware and understands the intention of the FCB zoning district. This is a unique zoning district, as it is a residential zoning district and holding place for future commercial development. Staff recommends that a neighborhood meeting be held with the property owners to provide background on the FCB zoning district and how the area might develop. General Design Standards The guidelines state that “building should be oriented to the street with fully articulated street facades based on traditional storefronts (doors and display windows) along the sidewalk”. The building is not oriented to the street, but rather more central to the site. This is due to the drive-through lane. It is hard for a drive-through business to have a building that is oriented to the street since it generally need circulation around the building. The property also has the Hardwood Creek Trail along Highway 61, which limits how close you can get the corner of the property to orient the building to the street. Although not labeled, it is assumed the canopy for the drive-through is covered along Highway 61. The design of the canopy will be important as this can help the orientation of the building be closer to the streets to meet the intent of the design guidelines. The guidelines state that “all new downtown development shall provide for pedestrian as well as vehicle circulation and shall create linkages to existing and proposed sidewalks”. The applicant is not showing the public road easement or the additional 8 foot wide trail easement on the south side of the property for construction of the trail along 147th Street. The proposed site plan will need to be revised to show the easement and trail along 147th Street. A connection from the site to the trail should be made with the revisions. Based on the use, 18 parking spaces are required. The applicant is showing 19 parking spaces and meets the parking ordinance. The guidelines discourage parking lots to be located between the street and the building. The guidelines encourage parking adjacent to the street to be minimized by a combination of landscaping, architectural fencing, or wall plantings. Streets and Access The sketch plan shows access from Flay Avenue on the east side of the property. The performance standards section of the City Code states that the main entrance of a drive- through business shall be located on a State Highway, County Road or City Commercial Collector Street. Flay Avenue is a residential local street. 147th Street is a collector street Premier Bank - Sketch Plan 6 in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. If the property is to be planned as a standalone project, staff would recommend the access from 147th Street. The site plan will be reviewed by MnDOT since it abuts Highway 61. Setbacks If the property is rezoned Central Business (C-1), the C-1 zoning district requires a 10 feet front yard setback, a 0 foot side yard setback, and 30 foot rear yard setback. Since the property is a corner lot it has two fronts along the streets and two sides to the north and east. The plan meets the setback requirements. The downtown design guidelines encourage a zero lot line for buildings along the road to create the traditional downtown main street atmosphere. Signage Downtown signage is critical to the character of the area. Signage and graphics should be integral to the building architecture or used as a design element. Back lit, box signs are not allowed. Corporate chains are encouraged to customize their architecture to express their brand within a design, context, and material appropriate with the character encouraged in the downtown design guidelines. The applicant is not showing any design plans for wall or freestanding signs. The applicant is showing a location of the freestanding monument sign at the southeast corner of the property. Gateway elements could be added to the corner as well. Architecture and Building Material The downtown design guidelines encourage new buildings to be designed with elements of traditional main street design, Hugo’s French trading post roots, or mid-western prairie style architecture. Traditional main street style buildings usually have flat roofs with well defined roof lines. The French trading post architectural elements include steeper or mansard roofs, open storefronts, and exterior plaster with stone and brick. Prairie style architecture has hipped roofs with low spreading deep overhangs. All of these styles are presented with more detail in the guidelines. The applicant has not provided elevations for the proposed building, but has provided examples of what the building could look like. Although, it seems like the examples use quality building materials, it is unclear how the building examples would meet the downtown design guidelines. The building will need to meet the downtown design guidelines for the architecture of the building. The applicant has not shown the location or proposed screening for the roof or ground mechanical equipment. All mechanical equipment shall be screened from view in a way that is integral to the architecture of the building with similar materials. This could include the raising of the parapets to screen roof top mechanical equipment. Premier Bank - Sketch Plan 7 Stormwater management The plan does not show a location for stormwater management on the property. The applicant will need to incorporate stormwater management into the site design. This may change the layout of the building and parking area. 4. CONCLUSION/ STAFF RECOMMENDATION: There are details on the plan that have been fully evaluated since this is a sketch plan application. At the time a site plan application is submitted, they will be further evaluated with additional information that will be required. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission provide feedback on the sketch plan to the applicant. A few discussion topics are outlined below: 1. Rezoning of the property from Future Central Business (FCB) to Central Business (C-1) 2. Drive-through lane 3. Orientation of the building on the property as it relates to the design guidelines 4. Transitions between land uses 5. Building architecture 6. Staff recommendation for a neighborhood meeting for the FCB zoning district area 5. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission unanimously made a recommendation to the City Council to hold a neighborhood meeting with property owners with the zoning of Future Central Business (FUS) to discuss what their property is zoned and how the area could develop. ATTACHEMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Applicant Narrative 3. Sketch Plan 4. Examples Building Elevations Provided by Applicant 5. Downtown Design Guidelines 6. Letter from Resident 147th Street North Forest Boulevard NorthFlay Avenue NorthFitzgerald Avenue North5616 147th Stre et N Location Map Hugo, MN Parcel Boundary selection Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary ¯0 100Feet1 in = 100 feet Document Path: S:\Mapping\Emily\LocationSite Maps\2022\Premier Bank.mxdSite 18'-0"24'-0"18'-0"10'-0"52'-0"8"22'-6"10'-0"PARKSETBACK24'-0"10'-0"2'-6"10'-0"10'-0"PARKSETBACK20'-0"9'-0"90'-0"10'-0"10'-0"PARKINGSETBACK159'-0" STACKING DISTANCEPREMIER BANK3,000 SFTRASHENCLOSURE52.092.052.092.0 195.5188.6150.20200.0014TH STREET NORTHFLAY AVENUE NORTHHIGH W A Y 6 1109MONUMENTSIGNCANOPYBICYCLE PARKINGEXISTING TREESEXISTING TREESFENCEPOTENTIAL TENANT1,368 SFCITY OF HUGO GATEWAY·ENHANCEDLANDSCAPING·PEDESTRIAN AMENTIESARCHITECTURAL SITEPLANA000PREMIER BANK5616 147TH STREET NORTHHUGO, MINNESOTA 55038PROJECT NUMBER: 2022007PREMNOT FORCONSTRUCTIONSignaturePrinted NameRegistration NumberI hereby certify that this plan, specification orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedArchitect under the laws of the State of MinnesotaDrawing IssuedDateproject name:prepared by:10K ARCHITECTURE, PLLC525 15TH AVENUE SOUTHHOPKINS, MN 55343CONTACT: CHAD HALLERPHONE: 612-799-1427EMAIL: CHAD.HALLER@10KARCH.COM©2022 BY 10K ARCHITECTURE, PLLCSKETCH PLANIssued: 03/30/2022Chad Haller, AIA53728ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN1/16"=1'-0"A0001NORTHPARCEL ID: 20.031.21.21.0029COUNTY: WASHINGTONPARCEL AREA:SITE INFORMATION:·CURRENT ZONING DESIGNATION: FUTURE BUSINESS DISTRICT (FCB)·PROPOSED REZONED DESIGNATION: CENTRAL BUSINESS DISTRICT (C-1)·A BANK IS A PERMITTED USE IN C-1·DRIVE-THROUGH SERVICES:- REQUIRES CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WITHIN 200 FEET FROM RESIDENTIALZONE PROPERTY- REQUIRES VARIANCE TO REDUCE STACKING LENGTH FROM 180 FEET TO159' FEET·BUILDING SETBACKS:-FRONT: 10 FEET-SIDE YARD: 0 FEET-REAR YARD: 30 FEET·ALLOWABLE BUILDING HEIGHT: 25 FEET MAXIMUM·PARKING REQUIREMENTS:-NUMBER REQUIRED: MINIMUM 1 SPACE PER 250 GROSS SF, 21 PROVIDED.-DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS: 9 FEET WIDE BY 18 FEET DEEP-AISLE WIDTH: 24 FEET REQUIRED FOR TWO-WAY TRAFFICZONING INFORMATION: City of Hugo Downtown Plan & Design Guidelines April 10, 2007 Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 1 of 23 Credits & Acknowledgements: We would like to thank the City of Hugo’s citizens – the residents and business owners – who attended the workshops and meetings, sent in their comments and gave their time to participate in the planning process. Their input has been invaluable in developing a master plan and design guidelines for the downtown area. We would like to thank the City of Hugo’s City Council, Planning Commission, City staff and consultants for leading this planning process. Funding for development of the downtown design guidelines and the preparation of this document was provided by a Livable Communities Opportunity Grant from the Metropolitan Council in 2004. City Council Fran Miron, Mayor Becky Petryk, Council Member Ward 1 Frank Puleo, Council Member Ward 2 Chuck Haas, Council Member Ward 3 Mike Granger, Council Member At Large Planning Commission Dave Schumann, Chairperson Bronwen Kleissler Tom Weidt Ron McRoberts Victoria Hoffbeck Bob Rosenquist Kelly Bailly City of Hugo Mike Ericson, City Administrator Bryan Bear, Community Development Director Michele Lindau, Community Development Assistant Mary Ann Creager, City Clerk Jay Kennedy, City Engineer (WSB) Kendra Lindahl, City Planner (Landform) Planning & Urban Design Consultant Carolyn Krall, AIA Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 2 of 23 Hugo Downtown Planning Framework Incorporated in 1906, Hugo is a rural small town with a family-oriented feel. As Hugo grew, the intersection of Forest Boulevard (now Highway 61) and Frenchman Road (now 145th Street) became the center of town. With a train depot and an active feed mill, this was the ideal location for local, small businesses. A downtown neighborhood began to grow into a comfortable, rural village. It is this small village familiarity that the residents of Hugo wish to preserve. Aerial Photograph of Hugo in 1974 Minnesota Historical Society The Hugo Downtown Framework Plan and Design Guidelines are intended to provide direction to new development in downtown Hugo and, where needed, to shape plans for redevelopment. The Plan illustrates the type of commercial and residential development, civic and community facilities, and amenities envisioned by the citizens of Hugo. The Plan extends beyond the central commercial business district (CBD) to illustrate the entire downtown commercial area of Hugo, both existing and envisioned in the future. This vision of future development in Hugo encourages commercial growth, while seeking to concentrate that growth, around the downtown area. The Planning Process The Hugo downtown plan and preliminary design guidelines were originally developed in 1998 to address redevelopment of the downtown commercial “Main Street” on Forest Boulevard (Highway 61). But the County Road 8 improvements and rerouting required that the original plan be revisited. The new plan was needed to address the developable area along County Road 8 and to consider the impact of the new County Road 8 and Highway 61 intersection. This planning process began in the fall of 2003 and included workshops with the City Council and downtown business and property owners. A community-wide open house was held in May 2004 to encourage public input on the final plan. In August 2004, the City was awarded an Opportunity Grant from the Livable Communities Demonstration Account to develop design guidelines for the downtown area to assist in implementation of the downtown plan. The process for developing these guidelines has continued through 2005-2006 with significant public participation in the planning process. Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 3 of 23 The Influence of Transportation Improvements A major influence on the plan is the County’s re-alignment and improvement of County Road 8. The county’s plan will widen and reroute the road to the south, connecting to Highway 61 at approximately 143rd Street. The County Road 8 re- alignment will have a significant impact on the downtown, offering opportunities for growth, improved vehicle and pedestrian access around the downtown area, and the potential for redevelopment to make improvements to the core of the downtown CBD and surrounding public and civic spaces. It is vital that the CBD not be cut off from County Road 8 and from the high volume of traffic which will use this route to access the interstate. Highway 61 is planned to continue to run north and south through downtown and the CBD. Despite projections of increased traffic volumes, this highway should not be widened beyond four lanes except to provide for turn movements. Instead, improvements to the roadway and access improvements can help accommodate the increased volumes. The downtown plan recommends improvements to improve street access and connectivity within downtown, as well as enhancements to pedestrian access and walkability. The plan also calls for extending the regional trail south across County Road 8 on the existing railroad bed and allows for the possibility of future commuter transit within this corridor (in the railroad ROW or on Highway 61). If Hugo is to continue to have a healthy downtown, it is important to plan for these future transportation changes. Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 4 of 23 Defining Downtown The downtown CBD in Hugo has always been located on Forest Boulevard (Highway 61) on both sides of the main traffic signal at 145th Street. But over time, the commercial area has grown and extended north and south along Highway 61, and the new development has been less compact and more auto- or highway-oriented than the older, more traditional downtown CBD. Without planning controls, this same pattern of commercial development could be expected to occur along the improved and upgraded County Road 8. While the core downtown central business district (CBD) is focused along Forest Boulevard- Highway 61 from County Road 8 to 147th Street, the Downtown Plan extends north to the Post Office and 150th Street, south to 140th Street, and from the shores of Egg Lake on the east to the bend in County Road 8 to the west. One of Hugo’s planning goals is to maintain a more compact and concentrated downtown CBD. This goal will be achieved by encouraging new development in and around the core of the downtown area, while planning for limited but well-ordered commercial development in specific areas along other commercial routes such as Highway 61 and County Road 8. Community feedback has consistently supported new CBD uses which complement downtown (such as restaurants and entertainment) and suggest that larger, single-use development and auto sales/service businesses, for instance, be located in commercial areas planned closer to I-35. Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 5 of 23 To create a sense of arrival in downtown, the plan recommends placing gateway elements – a landscaped sign, monument, or other feature – at these key entry points into downtown. While the plan doesn’t specify the elements at each location, when you enter downtown you should know that you are downtown. New development at these “gateway” locations should be planned not only to allow for these gateway elements but to convey the sense of quality and character that the downtown plan envisions. Proposed monument sign, Nov. 29, 2004 RSP Architects for Contractor Property Development Company The Downtown Plan The plan is a tool to help the City of Hugo create a pedestrian-friendly downtown and concentrates new development and redevelopment around the existing intersection of 145th Street and Highway 61. As Hugo continues to develop, the actual projects built may differ from the Illustrative Downtown Plan in the details of the development of any specific block or site, but the primary elements of the plan, including the public infrastructure (roads, parks, trails, open space) and the quality and character which makes this plan unique to Hugo are expected to be maintained. Gateway elements – signs, flags or monuments – should be included in the new downtown area to welcome a resident or visitor into an established and thriving downtown. Elements depicting the quality and character of downtown Hugo are displayed based on the historical and current architectural elements of Hugo. Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 6 of 23 The Downtown Plan City park with trails, gazebo, dock, pedestrian bridge Shared public parking Carpenters on the Lake Additional downtown senior housing Walkable community spaces along trail ROW Proposed trail connections New mixed-use development blending office and multi-family housing uses New mixed-use development with housing, offices and complementary retail/commercial uses Traditional residential blocks Improved park with future community center Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 7 of 23 Design Guidelines The intent of the Hugo Downtown Design Guidelines is to provide a baseline for quality in order to revitalize and expand the downtown business district. These guidelines are written to meet the community’s goals: Goal 1: Preserve the rural small town character of Hugo Goal 2: Establish a threshold or baseline for design and quality Goal 3: Maintain a harmonious visual environment within the existing architectural context Goal 4: Communicate the community's high expectations for new development in Hugo Objectives The specific objectives for downtown Hugo design guidelines are: • To establish a clear definition of urban design standards that informs property owners, developers, builders and decision-makers. • To serve as a tool that planners and designers can use and incorporate into their plans to achieve and support the City’s design objectives. • To act as a basis for a uniform and consistent review of development and redevelopment proposals by the City Council and Planning Commission. The design guidelines which apply specifically to the CBD also include principles that can be broadly applied to the entire Hugo Downtown Area. Downtown CBD The Design Guidelines apply specifically to the central business district or “Old Downtown” concentrated around Highway 61, from 147th Street to the new County Road 8 intersection. The guidelines provide more detailed definitions of requirements for site planning, placement of building mass, materials, architecture, lighting, signage, and design of the public realm. Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 8 of 23 Framework Principles for Downtown Hugo 1. Preserve and celebrate Hugo’s small town character. 2. Enhance the public realm, to maintain a pedestrian-oriented downtown. 3. Expand civic space and uses around City Hall. 4. Add new retail which complements existing businesses and shops and supports downtown neighborhoods. 5. Encourage unique small businesses to locate downtown and larger, single-use developments closer to the I-35 corridor. 6. Provide life-cycle housing to encourage senior-living in the downtown area. 7. Provide recreational uses for diverse age groups in the downtown area. 8. Improve downtown access and circulation with improvements to Highway 61 and downtown intersections (147th, 145th, County Road 8). 9. Reduce the impact of development close to Egg Lake to improve lake quality and preserve wildlife habitat. 10. Build upon unique assets such as the church, feed mill and City Hall with complementary design and materials. Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 9 of 23 Downtown District Design Guidelines General Design Standards • These design guidelines are intended to apply to the Downtown District CBD, but include principles that can be broadly applied to the greater Hugo Downtown Area (as indicated on the Downtown Plan), including the Central Business, Future Central Business and Central Residential zones If the CBD development extends beyond this boundary, the Downtown District boundaries may need to be extended accordingly. • On all streets in the downtown district, the guidelines are intended to apply to street frontage properties on both sides of the street. • New downtown development shall provide for pedestrian as well as vehicular circulation and shall create linkages to existing and proposed sidewalks and trails. • All new development should be sensitive to existing downtown neighborhoods and residences in the design and location of new uses and buildings with respect to shading, views, light or noise pollution; where necessary appropriate screening or buffering shall be provided. • All new development shall be designed to value, respect, and preserve identified natural features and resources. • A sense of City history should be encouraged, and landmarks such as St. John’s Cemetery and St. John’s Church should be preserved as important contributors to Hugo’s character. • Key points which have been identified as primary entrances to downtown Hugo should be designed as “gateways” to the City; gateway elements could include open space, unique landscaping, walls or gates, water features and City identity signage. These points include: • From the west – the bend in the County Road 8 at the western edge of Hugo; • From the east – At Egg Lake and the intersections where 147th and 140th meet Highway 61; • From the south – Where 140th meets Highway 61; • From the north – Where 147th meets Highway 61. • Along the west side of Highway 61, new downtown development will need to be designed to integrate with the railway corridor as it comes through the center of town: as a public open space, supporting the proposed trails, and considering future uses. Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 10 of 23 General Land Use • Downtown development should be appropriate for a traditional downtown area: mixed- use buildings combining retail, commercial, and residential uses, and encouragement of multi-story buildings in the downtown. • Neighborhood retail, service, and commercial buildings and uses which support downtown residential neighborhoods such as drug stores, banks, and specialty markets or small grocers are encouraged. • Destination retail, restaurant and entertainment uses, particularly mixed with compatible, complementary, or other synergistic uses, are highly encouraged. • New auto-dominated commercial development such as fast food, auto service, or similar high traffic drive-through facilities and large, single-use developments are discouraged in the downtown CBD. • Uses appropriate to the downtown area such as banks, coffee shops and pharmacies which enhance their business by providing drive-through services may be permitted provided they are designed to minimize impact on local downtown traffic circulation and pedestrian access. • Parking lots should only be allowed as an accessory use, except for municipal or public district parking; larger parking areas should be broken up into smaller areas to reduce the overall area of paving and promote a friendlier pedestrian environment. • New residential development should provide for the full range of life-cycle housing, offering choices of housing types (single-level flats, condominiums or lofts, single-level and multi-story townhouses, and single-family attached or detached), styles and prices, at a density appropriate to the downtown area. • New residential development should be sensitive to existing residential neighborhoods and incorporate well-designed transitions from multi-family to existing single-family residential areas. • Traditional neighborhood design (TND) based on a traditional street grid is a desirable option for downtown, medium-density areas. Single-family homes (detached or attached) or row townhomes should line the street with front porches and stoops, front yards, sidewalks and boulevards with regularly spaced trees and street lights. TND example with traditional street grid and porches facing the street Garage access at rear of house Sidewalks and boulevards on both sides of the street with regularly spaced street trees Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 11 of 23 • All downtown residential developments should be planned and designed to minimize paving for driveways and surface parking. Garage-forward or “snout-house” homes or townhomes are highly discouraged. Streets, Public Space & Amenities • Forest Boulevard (Highway 61) and 145th Street should be restored to be closer to their original, traditional downtown “Main Street” form, lined with street trees and planters, pedestrian street lights, and street furniture including benches and trash receptacles. The fixtures that are selected for these streets should be required continuously within the downtown CBD district and highly encouraged throughout the downtown commercial area for visual continuity. • Downtown intersections should be designed to be safe for pedestrians; enhancements to safety include use of textured-colored paving or striping to mark crosswalks, narrowed or throated intersections, pedestrian-oriented street lighting, planted center medians or landscaped boulevards, and warning signage at busy crossings along Highway 61, such as 147th, 145th and County Road 8. Highly Discouraged: Example of Garage-forward design, dominating view from sidewalk and street. Change in paving or striping marks the safe crossing zone for pedestrians at major crosswalks. Planted center medians or landscaped boulevards provide resting points for pedestrians at major crosswalks, facilitate turning movements, and help calm traffic speeds. Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 12 of 23 • The City street grid is a vital part of the way the downtown functions, so restoring streets or adding new streets that connect to the existing street grid are encouraged; disconnected streets and cul-de-sacs are highly discouraged. • Forest Boulevard (Highway 61) and 145th Street are the original “Main Streets” of downtown and, to an extent, the few remaining brick buildings along these streets should be preserved, renovated, or restored to productive use; new buildings close to these older structures warrant careful attention to design and detailing in order to relate well to the original structures. • The small park which is planned on Highway 61 across from City Hall is intended to act as a Town Square or Village Green – a community focal point with passive uses (green space, gardens, historical markers) and active uses (a gazebo, lake overlook, Farmers Market) incorporated into the design. Civic and mixed-use buildings should be located adjacent to the Town Square or Village Green, welcoming visitors to downtown Hugo. • The plan proposes a future pedestrian bridge over Highway 61, connecting the park and Egg Lake to City Hall and the bulk of the downtown area. This bridge, if well-designed, could also act as a visual cue to drivers to reduce speed and could create a sense of arrival and welcome for the downtown CBD. To be safe for both pedestrians and vehicles, downtown Hugo should include street improvements: narrowed intersections, pedestrian lighting (top left), planted medians (top right and bottom left), and visible signs warning of pedestrian crossings/vehicular speed decrease (top right). Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 13 of 23 The edge along the railroad ROW and the Hardwood Creek Regional Trail along the west side of Highway 61 should be maintained as an open-space corridor connecting City Hall and the CBD to new development to the south. This edge should include: • trail connections for bicycles and winter sports uses • landscaping to act as a year-round buffer; • pedestrian-oriented trail and street lighting; • places to rest with benches, planters and trash receptacles. • On downtown streets where retail and commercial uses are proposed, on-street parking is encouraged; streets should be designed with the parking lane designated either by curbing or with a change in paving materials. • Downtown district streets should allow for public right-of-way between the curb and the building wall, a minimum 10’-12’ wide. This area should be “zoned” to provide for street signs, landscaping and street trees, and both street and sidewalk lighting closest to the curb. There should be a clear pedestrian walking path in the center, and then an area designated for seating or other street furniture (trash receptacles, bus benches, etc) and commercial opportunities (including newspaper boxes). Where necessary, such as where the street ROW does not allow for a wider sidewalk, these amenities may need to be accommodated within the parcel boundaries. Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 14 of 23 Minimum ROW from curb to building (10’-12’) 5’-6’ Walking Area Defined 8’ parallel parking lane 2’-3’ Shop related furniture & amenities 3’ Public Area: trash receptacles, newspaper stands, streetlights, signs & street trees planted where sidewalk widens another option is a defined 20’ head-in angled parking zone Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 15 of 23 Architecture • Architecture of new buildings should be respectful of the existing historical structures which enhance the character of Hugo; design which reflects the elements of vernacular “Main Street”, Hugo’s French trading post roots, or mid-western “prairie style” architecture is encouraged: Entry feature; well distinguished and covered from the weather Well defined roof line 1st story with glazed display windows Cornice or roof line distinguishes 1st story from 2nd story Awnings with accent lighting and graphics instead of applied signs Building base expressed with masonry Early trading post and mill buildings in rural Minnesota were often made of stone with a simple gabled roof and expressed chimney. Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 16 of 23 Prairie Style: roofs are hipped, low and spreading with deep overhangs and eaves; Hugo City Hall has many of these elements. Traditional Main Street style building: flat roofs, often an extended or false parapet on “front” side or marking the main entrance. Hugo was once a French trading post, and many residents have expressed a desire to reflect those roots in the architecture of the downtown. Appropriate architectural elements include: steeper or mansard roofs with dormer windows, open storefronts with awnings, and exterior plaster, stone and brick. Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 17 of 23 • Architecture of new buildings should be built upon Hugo’s existing assets such as the church, the feed mill, and the new City Hall, with complementary design and sense of scale. • Buildings should be designed to relate well to the existing natural and man-made environment and stay within context in massing, materials, style and color; design of the landscape and hardscape should be coordinated and harmonious with the building design and materials. • Buildings should be constructed and maintained for permanence and longevity; therefore durable, maintainable materials (brick, stone, etc.) should be used; temporary buildings, metal sheds, etc. shall not be permitted. • Building entries should be visible from the street, well lit, covered or protected from weather, and include significant glazing and glass doors where the public will be entering buildings. New “Main Street” buildings should complement an established downtown through their architectural character. Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 18 of 23 • Awnings, overhangs and arcades are encouraged where pedestrians are expected to walk and shop ; flat awnings are preferred (no barrel awnings) with adequate clearance above sidewalk. • Building design elements should include an expression of a building base (of brick or stone), a middle, and a top with cornice elements at the top of the first floor and the top of the building. • Buildings should be designed with “four-sided architecture”, using the same quality materials on all sides: • all facades shall be articulated with a variety of materials, glazing, awnings, or other details to add visual interest; • roof lines and cornice details shall be completed in a three-dimensional manner so that the features on the back of the roof or similar unfinished areas are not visible; • the front façade may have a unique design or more significant glazing. • Buildings should be oriented to the street with fully articulated street facades based on traditional storefronts (doors and display windows) along the sidewalk. • Zero Lot Line commercial buildings are allowed and highly encouraged on all streets within the downtown district. • Along CR 8 and Hwy 61, entrances may be oriented to a side or rear parking lot, as long as the entry also has good pedestrian access and visibility from the street, and any building wall along these streets must contain significant amounts of “real” windows. • Equipment, mechanical systems, transformers, trash enclosures, etc. must be screened from view in a way that is integral to the architecture of the building with similar materials: • metal fencing or a mechanical vent screen alone is not sufficient; • access to these service areas needs to be provided at the alley, side or rear of the building. Rooftop equipment shall be screened from the line of site of pedestrians and integrated into the design and massing of the roof form Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 19 of 23 Parking & Service Areas • Within the downtown CBD, shared parking is encouraged to take advantage of varying parking demands between mixed uses. • Businesses are encouraged to establish or participate in a municipal parking district providing shared, public parking with reductions in required on-site parking. • Parking should not be located between a building and the street or main road the building faces and be distributed around the building, especially to the side and back of buildings. • Parking adjacent to the street should be minimized; • Where a parking lot is located along a street, the same zero-lot-line or setback conditions of the adjacent buildings should be maintained with a wall, ornamental fence, or similar landscape elements to continue the built edge along the street. • Where a parking lot is located along a street, it should be well landscaped and screened with a combination of fencing or wall plantings along the street edge. Landscaped edge combines fence with trees, low shrubs and ground cover for parking lot screening and buffering along the street 6’ zone between parking and sidewalk with fence or wall centered in zone Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 20 of 23 • Larger parking areas (over 25 vehicles) should be planned with internal landscaping, pedestrian sidewalks or walkways and be divided into smaller areas where possible: ƒ pedestrian walkways provided in larger parking lots should be landscaped, include path lighting, and provide direct access for pedestrians to an entrance of a commercial building; ƒ walkways should be raised, paved areas or defined paths distinguished by striping or a change in paving provided that pedestrians are kept safe from vehicular travel on the route to an entrance of a commercial building. Pedestrian walkways through busy parking lots are important because they provide a safe, well lit, direct access to the entrance of a building. Larger parking lots should have pedestrian walkways that are clearly identified and combined with landscaping to break up large areas of pavement. Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 21 of 23 • Buildings should be oriented to minimize views of service areas and loading docks from the street; service areas should be buffered with a combination of landscaping and screening; mechanical equipment and trash areas must be fully enclosed and integrated into the architecture using the same materials as the building: • metal fencing or a mechanical vent screen alone is not sufficient; • access to these service areas needs to be provided at the alley, side or rear of the building. • Residential buildings (single-family homes and multi-family buildings) should be oriented to minimize views of garages and parking areas from the street: • free-standing or detached garages should not be allowed for multi-family residences. • parking should be located below buildings or underground where possible. Below-grade parking: side or rear access. Garages should not be as invisible from the street as possible to create a traditional neighborhood feel. Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 22 of 23 Signage • Downtown signage is critical to the character of the area, especially at night; all downtown signage is subject to careful review with the City and must comply with all zoning and ordinance requirements for size, placement, materials, etc; • Signage and graphics should be integral to the building architecture or used as a decorative design element. Back-lit, box signs are not acceptable downtown. • Decorative neon, moving or other decorative sign types are desirable only when displayed within storefront window interiors of downtown buildings. • Corporate chains are encouraged to customize their architecture to express their design “brand” within a design, context, and material appropriate to the character of downtown Hugo. Projecting or Hanging Sign Wall Sign integrated into the building design Awning sign should be located on the awning face or fringe Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines Page 23 of 23 Open Space and Storm Water Management • New development should provide both private and public usable open space, plazas etc; these spaces should be connected to existing or proposed trail and sidewalk networks. • The downtown area should plan cohesively for storm water management and for improving the water quality of Hugo, however, where possible rain gardens or similar infiltration and holding areas should be integrated into the design of parking areas; design which harmonizes more groomed and landscaped areas with more natural landscape is encouraged: • Storm water ponds, rain gardens and other storm water management or holding areas shall be designed to be attractive in both flooded and dry conditions; use of native plants for filtration around pond and wetlands and other sustainable design approaches to site and landscape design are encouraged: More formal and groomed landscape Trail or Sidewalk Egg Lake Filtration Vegetation Swales planted as a rain garden; plants and soil provide filtration Trail or sidewalk 63LAND USE2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE 0L[HG8VH 0,; The Mixed Use designation provides opportunities for multiple, compatible uses on a single site. These uses will include two or more RIWKHIROORZLQJUHVLGHQWLDOFRPPHUFLDORI¿FHUHWDLODQGSXEOLF quasi-public uses, where the primary land use is commercial or residential. The mixed use areas are served or are intended to be served by municipal sewer and water. Providing a mix of land uses in close proximity to each other creates opportunities for residents to walk to shopping, transit services, recreation and work. Mixing land uses can reduce reliance on the automobile, while leading to greater convenience in people’s day-today lives. Minimum Area: 10 acres Minimum Residential Density 10 units per net acre Maximum Residential Density 60 units per net acre City Utilities: Required for all new development Types of Development:$PL[RIUHVLGHQWLDOFRPPHUFLDORI¿FHUHWDLODQGSXEOLFTXDVLSXEOLFXVHV Development Location Criteria: • Abuts or has reasonably direct access to major collectors or minor arterials • Transit within ½ mile walking distance of the development • Neighborhood parks or school parks within ½ mile walking distance of the development •'H¿QHGWUDLOV\VWHPWKDWFRQQHFWVWRRWKHUVHUYLFHVDQGIDFLOLWLHVLQFOXGLQJSDUNVVFKRROV churches and neighborhood shopping areas • Close proximity to jobs • Provide transitions to adjacent land uses Development Policies: • Small parcels should be consolidated to create parcels large enough to ensure well- planned development to occur • Natural resources should be preserved or enhanced • Provide for a variety of uses within the development • Provide strong pedestrian connections Go to 2040 Land Use Plan 64LAND USE2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Mixed Use Development Characteristics Mixed use development allows the mixing of higher intensity land uses in one building (vertical mixing) or the physical integration of different uses on the same lot or within close proximity (horizontal mixing). 7\SLFDOO\PL[HGXVHLQFOXGHVDFRPELQDWLRQRIUHWDLORI¿FHFXOWXUDORUHQWHUWDLQPHQWXVHVZLWKKLJKHUGHQVLW\UHVLGHQWLDOXVH+RZHYHUWKHVHXVHVFDQRFFXUZLWKRXWKRXVLQJDQGVWLOOEHFRQVLGHUHGPL[HGXVH Hugo will look for mixed use to occur primarily with a mix of non-residential uses (with or without housing as a component). Land suitable for higher density housing is limited in Hugo. Mixed use development sites would provide an opportunity for additional higher density housing in the City, while at the same time preserving or creating opportunity for commercial development. •0L[HGXVHGHYHORSPHQWVZLOOEHSURFHVVHGDVDSODQQHGXQLWGHYHORSPHQW 38' ZLWKWKHORFDWLRQRIVSHFL¿FXVHVDQGGHYHORSPHQWFULWHULDIRUWKHHQWLUHVLWHGHWHUPLQHGWKURXJKWKDWSURFHVV,QRUGHUWRGHYHORSDFRPSOHWHPL[RIXVHVLQWKLVDUHD the City has established a minimum development area of 10 acres. Existing parcels less than 10 acres in size must be combined with adjacent parcels in order to meet this minimum area requirement. • A minimum of 2,230 new housing units will be constructed in areas designated as mixed use. Housing within mixed use developments would consist primarily of multiple family housing types (apartments and condominiums) designed to meet the needs of smaller households, such as young adults, empty nesters and seniors. • The Mixed Use areas will provide an opportunity for residential uses at a minimum of 10 units per acre. This residential development will provide an opportunity for affordable housing to meet the City’s housing goals. It is expected that 50% of mixed use developments will be residential. •&RPPHUFLDOXVHVLQVPDOOHUPL[HGXVHGHYHORSPHQWVVKRXOGJHQHUDOO\EHOLPLWHGWRRI¿FHXVHVDQGQHLJKERUKRRGFHQWHUVWKDWRIIHUEDVLFFRQYHQLHQFHW\SHJRRGVDQGVHUYLFHVWRWKHQHLJKERUKRRG/DUJHUPL[HGXVHGHYHORSPHQWVFRXOGDOVR LQFRUSRUDWHUHWDLORUVHUYLFHHVWDEOLVKPHQWVWKDWSURYLGHJRRGVDQGVHUYLFHVRQDOLPLWHGFRPPXQLW\VFDOH GUXJVWRUHVUHVWDXUDQWVEDQNVSHUVRQDOVHUYLFHHVWDEOLVKPHQWVHWF DVZHOODVRI¿FHXVHV7KHW\SHRIFRPPHUFLDOXVHVLQPL[HGXVH development should allow residents to meet more of their daily needs through walking and fewer vehicle trips, thereby reducing congestion on public streets. • We expect that these areas will include a mix of residential and commercial uses, but some business park uses may also be permitted. These mixed use areas are in highly visible areas of the City and, consequently, development in these gateway areas will be expected to provide a higher level of site design and architectural design than in other areas of the city. There are three areas designated as Mixed Use in the City. The general characteristics of each district are described below, but the implementation steps indicate a master planning study will be undertaken for the Northern Gateway areas: Downtown District On April 10, 2007, the City approved the Downtown Plan & Design Guidelines to provide direction for new development in downtown Hugo and to shape plans for redevelopment. This vision of future development in Hugo encourages commercial growth, while seeking to concentrate that growth around the downtown area. A mix of walkable FRPPHUFLDOUHVLGHQWLDODQGRI¿FHXVHVLVGHVLUDEOHIRUWKH'RZQWRZQ District, and should be generally be more vertically integrated in and around the Downtown Mixed Use District. The Downtown District is shown as Mixed Use on the 2040 Land Use Plan. The City of Hugo expects development to occur in this area in compliance with the Downtown Plan & Design Guidelines (Appendix 3-2). Elmcrest Avenue and 170th Street This District will be a new northeastern gateway into the City. Current plans for redeveloping Elmcrest mean that this gateway could be of a similar size as the gateway at County Road 8. This mixed use district is most suitable for a mixed used development with an emphasis on commercial uses that will serve residents in nearby medium density districts and that need for visibility along County Road 4. Business and residential uses would also be a suitable component of the development district, with commercial likely along Elmcrest Avenue and County Road 4 with residential interior to the commercial development. Uses may be more horizontally integrated, with an emphasis on high quality architecture, landscaping, lighting and design along County Road 4. Gateway elements on the north and south side of County Road 4 at Elmcrest will be a part of any future development. Highway 61 and 170th Street The proximity of this district to other industrial uses makes it suitable IRUDPL[HGXVHGLVWULFWZLWKDQHPSKDVLVRQUHVLGHQWLDORI¿FHUHWDLO and public/quasi-public uses. The location of this district on Highway 61, County Road 4 and the Hardwood Creek Trail make this district an important transportation node and gateway to the City. Developments should provide coordinated and logically linked pedestrian, vehicle, and recreational plans that facilitate a comfortable user experience for the site’s users. This district will support auto-oriented uses that would not otherwise be allowed in the Downtown District. Development of mixed use centers in this district should be designed with one theme with similar architectural style, similar exterior building materials, and coordinated site elements such as landscaping and lighting. Developments and uses should be complementary to nearby mixed use developments. 15/12/2022 3:59 PMSu Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa12345678 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 2829 30 31May 2022Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa123456789101112 13 14 15 16 17 1819 20 21 22 23 24 2526 27 28 29 30June 2022May 2022May 12345677:00pm City Council891011121314Mother's Day (United States)6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm151617181920217:00pm City Council5:30pm EDA6:30pm Hist Comm7:00pm Parks Comm222324252627287:00pm Planning Comm293031Jun 1234Memorial Day (United States)SUNDAYMONDAYTUESDAYWEDNESDAYTHURSDAYFRIDAYSATURDAY 25/12/2022 3:59 PMSu Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa123456789101112 13 14 15 16 17 1819 20 21 22 23 24 2526 27 28 29 30June 2022Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa12345678910 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 2324 25 26 27 28 29 3031July 2022June 2022May 293031Jun 12345678910116:00pm City Admin Review 7:00pm City CouncilHugo Good Neighbor Days6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm12131415161718Hugo Good Neighbor DaysFlag Day (United States)7:00pm Parks Comm19202122232425Father's Day (United States)7:00pm City Council5:30pm EDA6:30pm Hist CommLMC Conference (Duluth, MN) 6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm2627282930Jul 12SUNDAYMONDAYTUESDAYWEDNESDAYTHURSDAYFRIDAYSATURDAY             The following items were distributed at  the Council meeting.  Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement Division 445 Minnesota Street, Suite 222, St Paul, MN 55101 6S 1-201·7500 Fax 651-297-5259 'ITY 651-282-6555 APPLICATION AND PERMIT FOR A , DAY ........~ TEMPORARY CONSUMPTION AND DISPLAY PERMIT (Cll)' Of c.ounty m,}}' not 1~ue more ttI~1) 10 permits in any IJnO! VNr) Name of organization Date organized Tax exempt number IHugo Uons Club = = I ~an l 1975 II....--.JS4_2_3_37_5 Address City State Zip Code § Box 321 I [HUgO I [~innewta 11_55_03_8__--...J Nam€ of person making appllcatton 8uslness phone Home phone lOan Balthazor J los 1-777·6924 llr'""6-12.-.-91..:.0--0-9-94-------, D.,te(s) of evenl Type of organizationIi10-22 thru ~ 12·202 2 181 Club 0 Cha ritab~e 0 Religious 0 Other non ·profit Organjz;jtion officer's name City Slale Zip ["'Xl 0," B.kh"nr ~9n IIMione",.. II SS038 JOddNew Officer Location where pe rmn 'NiB be used. If an outdoo r <:Ire~, de5cribe. Hanifl Fields 7032 137th St. Hugo, MN. 55038 APPROVAL APPUCAnoN MUST BE APPROVED B.Y an'Oil COUNTY ElEFORE SU8Mlmttffi TO ALCOHOL AND c.AMflLtNG ENFORCEMENT City or Cou nty "pproving the license Date Approved tee Amount Permit Date Date Fee Paid ("ity or Cau nty Email Address City or County phone number Signature City Clerk O( County Offidal AppfOVOO Director Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement CLERKS NOTICE: Submil this form to Akohol and Gambling Entore m t Division 30 days prior to evellt. 'ONE SUBMISS O,N PER EMAIL, APiPLICATION ONLY. PLEASE PROVIDE A VA, 10 E-MA.IL ADDRESS FOR THE C'ITYICOUNTY AS ALL TEMPORARY ,PEIRMIT APPROVALS Wi lL BE SENT B.ACKV A EMA'll. E-MAIL HEAPPLCATtONSGNEDBYCtTY/COUNTYTOAGE.TEMPORA!RYAPPUCATION@STATiE.MN.US: Sheet of 1 RECIPROCAL EMERGENCY SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUGO AND THE CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT In an effort to provide reasonable emergency services and automatic response to reported structure and building fires for residents, the Centennial Fire District and the City of Hugo have entered into this Reciprocal Emergency Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) to make equipment, personnel and other resources available to their respective fire departments. In this Agreement, the following terms shall have meanings given below: 1. “Party” means the City of Hugo through its Fire Department or the Centennial Fire District through its Fire Department. 2. “Requesting Official” means the person designated by a Party who is responsible for requesting Assistance from the other Party. 3. “Requesting Party,” means a Party that requests assistance from the other Party. 4. “Responding Official” means a Party that provides assistance to a Requesting Party. 5. “Assistance” means fire/rescue and/or emergency medical services personnel and equipment. ____________________________________________________________________________________ 1. Request for Assistance. Whenever, in the opinion of a Requesting Official, there is a need for assistance from the other Party, the Requesting Official may call upon the Responding Official of the other Party to furnish assistance. 2. Response to Request. Upon the request of assistance from a Requesting Party, the Responding Official may authorize and direct his or her Party’s personnel to provide assistance to the Requesting Party. This decision will be made after considering the needs of the Responding Party and the reasonable availability of resources. 3. Automatic Assistance. If either Party receives notice of a reported structure or building fire within the coverage areas of the other Party, that Party will automatically dispatch assistance to the scene without waiting for a request for assistance from the other Party. The automatic dispatch may include an engine, crew, and a chief officer, if he or she is available. 4. Recall of Assistance. The Responding Official may at any time recall such assistance if, based on his or her reasonable discretion under the circumstances or on order from the governing body of the Responding Party, it is considered to be feasible and reasonable for the Responding Party to do so. 2 5. Command of Scene. The first arriving Party will establish command. Subsequently, command may be transferred as mutually agreed. 6. Workers Compensation. Each Party shall be responsible for injuries or death of its own personnel. Each Party will maintain workers’ compensation insurance or self-insurance coverage, covering its own personnel while they are providing assistance pursuant to this Agreement. Each Party, on behalf of itself and its employees and agents, waives the right to sue the other Party for any workers’ compensation/disability or death benefits paid to or sought by its own employees or their dependents, even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of the other Party or its officers or employees. Each Party’s employees shall be considered employees of that Party and not of the other Party. Each Party shall defend and indemnify the other for its obligations hereunder. 7. Damage to Equipment. Each Party shall be responsible for damages to or loss of its own equipment. Each Party waives the right to sue the other Party for any damages to or loss of its equipment, even if the damages or losses were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of the other Party or its officers, employees or volunteers. 8. Liability. The Requesting Party agrees to defend and indemnify the Responding Party against any claims brought or actions filed against the Responding Party or any officer or employee, of the Responding Party for injury to, death of, or damage to the property of any third person or persons, arising from the performance and provision of assistance in responding to a request for assistance by the Responding Party pursuant to this Agreement. In the case in which automatic assistance is provided, each Party shall be responsible for any claims or actions filed against its own officers or employees, arising from the performance and provision of assistance pursuant to this Agreement. Under no circumstances, however, shall a Party be required to pay on behalf of itself and the other Party, any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 applicable to any one Party. The limits of liability for both of the Parties may not be added together to determine the maximum amount of liability for one Party. Neither Party waives any immunities or limits on liability it enjoys under Minnesota Statutes or common law The intent of this subdivision is to impose on each Requesting Party a limited duty to defend and indemnify a Responding Party for claims arising within the Requesting Party’s jurisdiction. The purpose of creating this duty to defend and indemnify is to simplify the defense of claims by eliminating conflicts among defendants, and to permit liability claims against multiple defendants from a single occurrence to be defended by a single attorney. Neither Party to this Agreement nor any officer of either Party shall be liable to the other Party or to any other person for failure of either Party to furnish assistance to the other Party, or for recalling assistance, both as described in this Agreement. 3 9. Charges. A. No charges will be levied by a Responding Party to this Agreement for assistance rendered to a Requesting Party under the terms of this Agreement unless that assistance continues for a period of more than 12 hours. If assistance provided under this Agreement continues for more than 12, hours, the Responding Party will submit to the Requesting Party a bill for the cost of any assistance provided after the initial 12-hour period, according to the rate schedule as established by the Capital City Mutual Aid Association fee schedule. Such charges are not contingent upon the availability of federal or state government funds. B. If automatic assistance to a reported building or structure fire in the coverage areas of this Agreement is rendered, each Party will be responsible for its own costs of responding to that fire. 10. Duration. This Agreement will be in force from the date of execution by the second Party until either Party withdraws from this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other Party to the Agreement. Notwithstanding any termination of this Agreement, its provisions governing indemnification and allocation of costs or damage shall survive any termination. 11. Execution. Each party hereto has read, agreed to and executed this Reciprocal Emergency Services Agreement on the date indicated. Each Party to this Agreement shall maintain an executed copy of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, have executed this Agreement on behalf of the respective Parties. Centennial Fire District By _______________________________________, its Chair Date____________________ By _______________________________________, its City Administrator Date_______________ By _______________________________________, its City Administrator Date_______________ City of Hugo By _______________________________________, its Mayor Date____________________ By________________________________________, its City Manager Date____________________ 1 RECIPROCAL EMERGENCY SERVICES AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF HUGO AND THE CENTENNIAL FIRE DISTRICT In an effort to provide the best possiblereasonable emergency services and automatic response to reported structure and building fires for residents, the Centennial Fire District and the City of Hugo have entered into this Reciprocal Emergency Services Agreement (the “Agreement”) to make equipment, personnel and other resources available to their respective fire departments. In this Agreement, the following terms shall have meanings given below: 1. “Party” means the City of Hugo through its Fire Department or the Centennial Fire District through its Fire Department. 2. “Requesting Official” means the person designated by a Party who is responsible for requesting Assistance from the other Party. 3. “Requesting Party,” means a Party that requests assistance from the other Party. 4. “Responding Official” means a Party that provides assistance to a Requesting Party. 5. “Assistance” means fire/rescue and/or emergency medical services personnel and equipment. ____________________________________________________________________________________ 1. Request for Assistance. Whenever, in the opinion of a Requesting Official, there is a need for assistance from the other Party, the Requesting Official may call upon the Responding Official of the other Party to furnish assistance. 2. Response to Request. Upon the request of assistance from a Requesting Party, the Responding Official may authorize and direct his or her Party’s personnel to provide assistance to the Requesting Party. This decision will be made after considering the needs of the Responding Party and the reasonable availability of resources. 3. Automatic Assistance. If either Party receives notice of a reported structure or building fire within the coverage areas of the other Party, that Party will automatically dispatch assistance to the scene without waiting for a request for assistance from the other Party. The automatic dispatch may include an engine, crew, and a chief officer, if he or she is available. 4. Recall of Assistance. The Responding Official may at any time recall such assistance if, based on his or her best judgmentreasonable discretion under the circumstances or on order from the governing body of the Responding Party, it is considered to be in the best interestsfeasible and reasonable for the of the Responding Party to do so. 2 5. Command of Scene. The first arriving Party will establish command. Subsequently, command may be transferred as mutually agreed. 6. Workers Compensation. Each Party shall be responsible for injuries or death of its own personnel. Each Party will maintain workers’ compensation insurance or self-insurance coverage, covering its own personnel while they are providing assistance pursuant to this Agreement. Each Party, on behalf of itself and its employees and agents, waives the right to sue the other Party for any workers’ compensation/disability or death benefits paid to or sought by its own employees or their dependents, even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of the other Party or its officers or employees. Each Party’s employees shall be considered employees of that Party and not of the other Party. Each Party shall defend and indemnify the other for its obligations hereunder. 7. Damage to Equipment. Each Party shall be responsible for damages to or loss of its own equipment. Each Party waives the right to sue the other Party for any damages to or loss of its equipment, even if the damages or losses were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of the other Party or its officers, employees or volunteers. 8. Liability. The Requesting Party agrees to defend and indemnify the Responding Party against any claims brought or actions filed against the Responding Party or any officer or employee, of the Responding Party for injury to, death of, or damage to the property of any third person or persons, arising from the performance and provision of assistance in responding to a request for assistance by the Responding Party pursuant to this Agreement. In the case in which automatic assistance is provided, each Party shall be responsible for any claims or actions filed against its own officers or employees, arising from the performance and provision of assistance pursuant to this Agreement. Under no circumstances, however, shall a Party be required to pay on behalf of itself and the other Party, any amounts in excess of the limits on liability established in Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 466 applicable to any one Party. The limits of liability for both of the Parties may not be added together to determine the maximum amount of liability for one Party. Neither Party waives any immunities or limits on liability it enjoys under Minnesota Statutes or common law The intent of this subdivision is to impose on each Requesting Party a limited duty to defend and indemnify a Responding Party for claims arising within the Requesting Party’s jurisdiction. The purpose of creating this duty to defend and indemnify is to simplify the defense of claims by eliminating conflicts among defendants, and to permit liability claims against multiple defendants from a single occurrence to be defended by a single attorney. Neither Party to this Agreement nor any officer of either Party shall be liable to the other Party or to any other person for failure of either Party to furnish assistance to the other Party, or for recalling assistance, both as described in this Agreement. 3 9. Charges. A. No charges will be levied by a Responding Party to this Agreement for assistance rendered to a Requesting Party under the terms of this Agreement unless that assistance continues for a period of more than 12 hours. If assistance provided under this Agreement continues for more than 12, hours, the Responding Party will submit to the Requesting Party a bill for the cost of any assistance provided after the initial 12-hour period, according to the rate schedule as established by the Capital City Mutual Aid Association fee schedule. Such charges are not contingent upon the availability of federal or state government funds. B. If automatic assistance to a reported building or structure fire in the coverage areas of this Agreement is rendered, each Party will be responsible for its own costs of responding to that fire. 10. Duration. This Agreement will be in force from the date of execution by the second Party until either Party withdraws from this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other Party to the Agreement. Notwithstanding any termination of this Agreement, its provisions governing indemnification and allocation of costs or damage shall survive any termination. 11. Execution. Each party hereto has read, agreed to and executed this Reciprocal Emergency Services Agreement on the date indicated. Each Party to this Agreement shall maintain an executed copy of this Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, have executed this Agreement on behalf of the respective Parties. Centennial Fire District By _______________________________________, its Chair Date____________________ By _______________________________________, its City Administrator Date_______________ By _______________________________________, its City Administrator Date_______________ City of Hugo By _______________________________________, its Mayor Date____________________ By________________________________________, its City Manager Date____________________