Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2022.06.06 CC Packet A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. May 16, 2022, City Council Meeting E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. None Scheduled G. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion and a roll call vote. If a member of the City Council or the public wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approve Claims Roster 2. Approve Steven Garcia as New Public Works Mechanic 3. Approve Corey Triemert as New Public Works Worker 4. Approve Riley Hollerback as New Public Works Worker 5. Approve Hiring of Summer Seasonal Employees 6. Approve Advertisement for Associate Planner Position in Community Development Department 7. Approve Promotion of Firefighter Jim Roettger to Engineer on the Hugo Fire Department 8. Approve Special Event Permit for Tough Mudder on July 9-10, 2022 9. Approve Temporary Liquor License for Hugo Lions Club for the Tough Mudder on July 9- 10, 2022 10. Approve Resolution Approving Lot Split at 5342 142nd Street North – Pastorius 11. Approve Resolutions Approving Preliminary Plat and PUD General Plan for the Shores of Oneka Lake 12. Approve Fireworks Display for Hugo Good Neighbor Days on Saturday, June 11, 2022 13. Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for Oneka Elementary School Expansion 14. Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for a Driveway for a Property on 170th Street 15. Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for The Shores of Oneka Lake Residential Development 16. Approve Resolution for Encroachment Agreement for 16094 Fairoaks Avenue 17. Approve Reduction in Letter of Credit for Adelaide Landing 6th Addition 18. Approve Pay Request No. 19 from Ebert Construction for Public Works Facility 19. Approve Pay Request No. 20 from Ebert Construction for Public Works Facility Agenda HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HUGO CITY HALL MONDAY, JUNE 6, 2022 – 7 P.M. H.PUBLIC HEARING 1.None Scheduled I.UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1.None Scheduled J.NEW BUSINESS 1.Approve Site Plan for Liberty Classical Academy for Property Located at 10158 122nd Street North K.VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1.None Scheduled L.COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1.None Scheduled M.ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1.Future Central Business Zoning District Neighborhood Meeting June 9, 2022. N.ADJOURNMENT BACKGROUND MEMO FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON JUNE 6, 2022 D.1 Approve Minutes for the May 16, 2022, City Council Meeting Staff recommends Council approve the above minutes as presented. G.1 Approve Claims Roster Staff recommends Council approve the Claims Roster as presented. G.2 Approve Steven Garcia as New Public Works Mechanic Staff is recommending the hiring of Steven Garcia to fill the vacant position of Public Works Mechanic. Steven comes to us with years of mechanic experience as a mechanic at Delta Airlines, Tousley Sports and Auto Nation. Steven will be a great asset to the City’s Public Works Department. If approved, Steven would begin work on Tuesday, June 7, 2022. Staff recommends Council approval to hire Steven Garcia as a Public Works Mechanic. G.3 Approve Hiring of Corey Triemert as Public Works Worker Staff is recommending the hiring of Corey Triemert to fill the vacant position of Public Works Worker. Corey comes to us with 5 years of experience as a Public Works Worker at White Bear Township and several years as an equipment operator at Park Construction. Corey is also a Hugo resident. He will be a great asset to the City’s Public Works Department. If approved, Corey would begin work on Monday, June 27, 2022. Staff recommends Council approval to hire Corey Triemert as a Public Works Worker. G.4 Approve Hiring of Riley Hollerback as Public Works Worker In the 2022 City Budget document, Council included an additional position for the Public Works Department. While interviewing for the position that became vacant in January, staff was very pleased with the number of quality applicants we received. Because of this, staff agreed that the timing was right to fill the additional position that was budgeted for. Staff is recommending the hiring of Riley Hollerbach to fill the budgeted position of Public Works Worker. Riley comes to us with 6 years of experience as a Public Works Worker at Washington County and several years as an equipment operator at Nelson Contracting. He will be a great asset to the City’s Public Works Department. If approved, Riley would begin work on Tuesday, June 21, 2022. Staff recommends Council approval to hire Riley Hollerbach as a Public Works Worker. G.5 Approve Hiring of Summer Seasonal Employees At the second council meeting in April, the City Council approved the hiring of four summer seasonal employees. At that time, staff was continuing to look for a fifth summer seasonal. Since then, one of the previously hired seasonal employees, Russ Pastorious, decided not to come work for the City. Staff recently received applications from two people. Staff is recommending Council approval to hire these two individuals. With the approval, the total number of seasonal employees would be at the budgeted five positions. Seasonal Public Works Employees assist with mowing, garbage/litter removal, park maintenance, boulevard maintenance and general public works maintenance. Staff recommends Council approval to hire Anthony Jorgenson and Samuel Larsen as summer seasonal employees. G.6 Approve Advertisement for Associate Planner Position in Community Development Department At its April 18, 2022, meeting, the Council authorized staff to advertise for a new community development intern with the resignation of Emily Weber. Staff has not filled this position and would like to hire an Associate Planner. Staff recommends Council approve the advertisement for an Associate Planner for the Community Development Department. G.7 Approve Promotion of Firefighter Jim Roettger to Engineer on the Hugo Fire Department Firefighter Jim Roettger was interviewed in late 2021 and offered an engineer’s position pending the completion of a Fire Apparatus Operator class with Century College. Jimmy has successfully completed that class and is ready to be promoted to Engineer. Fire Chief Jim Compton, Jr. recommends Council approve Jim Roettger as Engineer effective June 1, 2022. G.8 Approve Special Event Permit for Tough Mudder on July 9-10, 2022 The Tough Mudder has applied for a Special Event Permit to hold their two- day endurance sport event at Wild Wings Game Farm on July 9 and 10, 2022. This will be the sixth year the event has been held at Wild Wings. A Special Event Permit approved by Council is required because there will be approximately 10,000 people on site on Saturday and 3,000 on Sunday, impacts to public streets, use of an amplified sound system, and alcohol served. Staff has reviewed the application with Wild Wings, the Hugo Fire Department, and the Washington County Sheriff’s Department and feels the event has been well planned. Staff recommends the Council approve the Special Event Permit for the Tough Mudder event to be held on July 9-10, 2022, with the conditions attached to the permit. G.9 Approve Temporary Liquor License for Hugo Lions Club for the Tough Mudder on July 9-10, 2022 The Hugo Lions Club has applied for a Temporary Liquor License to serve beer at the Tough Mudder event on July 9 and 10, 2022. Beer will be supplied by Lake Monster Brewing, and race participants will receive one free beer with the registration if they are 21+ years of age. Identification will be checked and wristbands will be used. Approximately 87% of participants are over 21 years of age. Two deputies will be located in the base area where alcohol is served. Staff recommends Council approve the Temporary Liquor License for the Tough Mudder event on July 9 and 10, 2022 G.10 Approve Resolution Approving Lot Split at 5342 142nd Street North – Pastorius Cathleen Pastorius is requesting approval of a lot split to create two lots out of a 1.23 acre lot. The proposed lots are 0.73 acres and 0.50 acres. At its May 26, 2022, meeting the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the request. Staff recommended approval of the request. There was no one that spoke during the public hearing. The Planning Commission agreed that the request met the requirements necessary to approve the lot split. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the lot spilt to the City Council, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution. G.11 Approve Resolutions Approving Preliminary Plat and PUD General Plan for the Shores of Oneka Lake M/I Homes is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a residential development. The property totals 131.66 acres and is comprised of three parcels. The preliminary plat includes 218 residential lots, and 10 outlots to be known as “The Shores of Oneka Lake”. The housing types are proposed to be a combination of single family homes, villa homes, and twinhomes. At its May 26, 2022, meeting the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the request. Staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat and PUD. There was one person that spoke during the public hearing. They had questions about tree removal and construction access for the development. The Planning Commission agreed that the request met the requirements necessary to approve the preliminary plat and PUD. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the preliminary plat and PUD, subject to the conditions in the resolutions. G.12 Approve Fireworks Display for Hugo Good Neighbor Days on Saturday, June 11, 2022 The Hugo Lions Club is requesting approval to hold a fireworks display on Saturday, June 11, 2022, during Good Neighbor Days. Fireworks will be put on by PC Pyrotechnics, LLC. The fireworks will be lit at the east end of the Hanifl Park. The Lions have been working with the Hugo Fire Department and Pyrotechnics, LLC has provided insurance. Staff recommends Council approve the Fireworks Display for Good Neighbor Days on Saturday, June 11, 2022. G.13 Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for Oneka Elementary School Expansion The White Bear Lake School District has applied for approval of a wetland replacement plan to construct an addition to Oneka Elementary School. The construction of the addition will result in .025 acres of wetland impact. The applicant is proposing to replace the impacts to the wetland basin though the purchase of wetland credits from an approved wetland bank. Staff recommends approval of the wetland replacement plan, subject to final Technical Evaluation Panel issuance of the Notice of Decision for the wetland replacement application. G.14 Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for a Driveway for a Property on 170th Street Jim Reese and Cari Pratley have applied for approval of a wetland replacement plan to construct a driveway to access the buildable portion of their property. The property is located south of 170th Street and East of Henna Avenue. Construction of the driveway will result in .35 acres of wetland impact. The applicants are proposing to replace the impacts to the wetland basin though the purchase of wetland credits from an approved wetland bank. Staff recommends approval of the wetland replacement plan, subject to final Technical Evaluation Panel issuance of the Notice of Decision for the wetland replacement application. G.15 Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for The Shores of Oneka Lake Residential Development M/I Homes is proposing to develop a 132 acre property located west of Oneka Lake. The development will include 218 residential lots for various housing types. The property has 26.8 acres of wetlands on site. The development will result in .95 acres of wetland impact, mostly for road construction and grading. The applicant is proposing to replace the impacts to the wetland basin though the purchase of wetland credits from an approved wetland bank. Staff recommends approval of the wetland replacement plan, subject to final Technical Evaluation Panel issuance of the Notice of Decision for the wetland replacement application. G.16 Approve Resolution for Encroachment Agreement for 16094 Fairoaks Avenue Matthew and Derek Pacula has requested an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 16094 Fairoaks Avenue North. The Senior Engineering Technician has reviewed the location of the fence and is comfortable with the request. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends that the City Council approve the encroachment agreement for the property located at 16094 Fairoaks Avenue North. G.17 Approve Reduction in Letter of Credit for Adelaide Landing 6th Addition Adelaide Landing 6th Addition has had substantial work completed to date and the developer is requesting a reduction in the letter of credit. The current letter of credit for the 6th Addition is in the amount of $347,303. Staff has inspected the work completed to date and recommends Council approve the reduction in the letter of credit to $251,903.62 based on the value of work remaining to be completed G.18 Approve Pay Request No. 19 from Ebert Construction for Public Works Facility Ebert Construction has submitted an application for payment for the City of Hugo Public Works Facility project in the amount of $6,314.89. The quantities completed to date have been reviewed and agreed upon by the architect, contractor and city staff. The amount indicated above reflects the work certified through April 30, 2022 with a 5% retainage applied. Total retainage being held for the project to date is $474,038.42. Staff recommends the City Council approve payment request #19 in the amount of $6,314.89 to Ebert Construction for the construction of the City of Hugo Public Works facility. G.19 Approve Pay Request No. 20 from Ebert Construction for Public Works Facility Ebert Construction has submitted an application for payment for the City of Hugo Public Works Facility project in the amount of $123,360.60. The quantities completed to date have been reviewed and agreed upon by the architect, contractor and city staff. The amount indicated above reflects the work certified through May 31, 2022 with a 5% retainage applied. Total retainage being held for the project to date is $480,531.08. Staff recommends the City Council approve payment request #20 in the amount of $123,360.60 to Ebert Construction for the construction of the City of Hugo Public Works facility. J.1 Approve Site Plan for Liberty Classical Academy for Property Located at 10158 122nd Street North Liberty Classical Academy is seeking approval of site plan for additional parking and enhanced main entrance to the existing school located at 10158 122nd Street North. At its May 26, 2022, meeting the Planning Commission considered the request. Staff recommended approval of the site plan request. A representative from the school provided background on the school and the site plan request. The Planning Commission agreed that the request met the requirements necessary to approve the site plan. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the site plan request, subject to the conditions in the resolution. Rebekah Hagstrom, Headmaster of Liberty Classical Academy and Morgan Traynor, of the school construction committee will be present to introduce the school to the City Council and what the plans are for the property. M.1 Future Central Business Zoning District Neighborhood Meeting June 9, 2022 At its May 16, 2022, meeting, Council considered a site plan for a bank on property located on the northeast corner of 147th Street and Flay Avenue. There was a discussion of the properties being zoned Future Central Business and whether the property owners were clear on that zoning designation. Council directed staff to schedule a meeting with those property owners. The meeting has been scheduled for Thursday, June 9, 2022, at 6 p.m., and staff recommends Council schedule this as a meeting if they wish to attend. N. Adjournment Call to Order Mayor Weidt called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. COUNCIL PRESENT: Klein, Miron, Petryk, Strub (ZOOM), Weidt COUNCIL ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: City Administrator Bryan Bear, City Engineer Mark Ericson, Community Development Director Rachel Juba, City Clerk Michele Lindau Approval of Minutes for May 2 2022, City Council Meeting Klein made motion, Petryk seconded, to approve the minutes for the City Council meeting held on May 2, 2022, as presented. All Ayes. Motion carried. Approval of Agenda Weidt made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the agenda as presented. All Ayes. Motion carried . Hugo Fire Department 2021 Annual Report Fire Chief Jim Compton, Jr. presented the Hugo Fire Department Annual Report for 2021. He thanked Finance Director Anna Wobse, Finance and Public Works Administrative Assistant Jennifer Compton, and Accounting Clerk Amber Lozier for their help in gathering the data. Compton reviewed the positions of the 26 staff members and provided call volume statistics. Call volume was up about 9% from the previous year with a total of 355 calls. He provided a breakdown of call types saying the majority of them were rescue assists with MHealth at 154 calls. There were only three structure fires they responded to in 2021 but none of them were in Hugo. He showed data on trends over the years and data on when the calls were coming in. August showed to be the busiest month, and the peak time was between 8 a.m. and 7 p.m. This information helped them with staffing. He said they were likely to see a continued increase in call volume due to growth in the City. Operational improvements in 2021 included five new firefighters, improvements to equipment and additional gear. Many of this was done with gambling proceeds donated by the Hugo and Bayport American Legions and with State Fire Marshall Grants. The department was back to fully staffed training since COVID with 3,448 training hours in 2021. Compton talked about the success of the AED initiative which began in 2017. The department maintains 20 AEDs. Many were upgraded with donations received from the Hugo American legion. Donations totaled Minutes HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HUGO CITY HALL MONDAY, MAY 16, 2022 – 7 P.M. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 16, 2022 Page 2 of 10 $40,000 and continue to come in. Goals for 2022 were to continue talks about transitioning to a full-time fire chief and a new daytime staffing model. Weidt said a good piece of information for staffing purposes would be to figure out which days of weeks are busiest. Klein asked about the purchase of the used school bus. Compton responded they had not taken possession yet but will soon, and it will be used to do school bus rescue drills. It was going to cost $100 to tow it, but the department will get $500 back when they scrap it. Swearing in of Jason Palmquist as Training Captain on the Hugo Fire Department At their March 21, 2022 meeting, Council approved the promotion of Jason Palmquist to training captain when Ross Hoernemann was moved to safety captain. Fire Chief Jim Compton, Jr. performed the swearing in of Jason Palmquist as training captain. Swearing in of Ryan Nadeau as Training Lieutenant on the Hugo Fire Department At their May 5, 2022, meeting Council approved the promotion of Ryan Nadeau to training lieutenant when Jason Palmquist was promoted to training captain. Fire Chief Jim Compton, Jr. performed the swearing in of Ryan Nadeau as training lieutenant of the Hugo Fire Department. M Health Fairview EMS 2021 Annual Report M Health Operations Supervisor Kevin Kane and Deputy Chief Tom Dunn were in attendance to present the M Health Fairview EMS 2021 Annual Report. Tom presented regional statistics and a comparison with other Cities. He talked about response time saying that COVID had thrown off a lot of numbers. In June of 2020, their goal was an eight-minute response time, and they had surpassed that goal at seven minutes and 34 seconds. He had data on call types and said they received mutual aid 42 times last year and provided mutual aide as well. There were 849 scene responses in Hugo and only 23 emergency transports. An initiative they had been leading was a more responsible use of lights and sirens. He provided information on call types, which were initially categorized by dispatch, but they often change. Kevin said they were looking forward to getting more involved with the community and continuing monthly meetings with the Hugo Fire Department to get ahead of issues and address them quickly. M Health provided the Hugo Fire Department with medical training free of charge. EMS week was this week, and starting next week they would be introducing a facility dog to provide active/passive therapy for crews. Kevin would be its primary handler and attending some community events. Hugo Good Neighbor Days Special Event Permit The Hugo Good Neighbor Days Festival will be held Thursday, June 9th - Sunday, June 12th. Hugo Lions member Dan Balthazor explained the festival this year would be held at the Hanifl Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 16, 2022 Page 3 of 10 Shelter and Fields due to the reconstruction of Lions Park. Parking may be an issue since parking can not be done on the county road. They were considering an area where they would have 140 spots striped, and there will be additional spots near the Rice Lake Centre. They were establishing park and ride locations for three buses. They were planning for a beer garden, bands on Friday and Saturday night, and they will be renting fencing. Security would be provided by an outside company, and they were still working on fireworks. They were currently talking to the White Bear Lake School District to park the carnival campers and equipment trailers to the west of the old Public Works Building on land now owned by the district. They were planning for food trucks, cornhole tournaments, pony rides, merchant booths, inflatables, and face painting. There would be no rib contest this year, and they may do a fall event for that. Weidt made motion, Miron seconded, to waive the Special Event Permit fee, provide Washington County Sheriff Deputies, approve Temporary Liquor License, approve the Off-site Gambling Permit for Bingo, and continue to work with staff on details of the event. All Ayes. Motion carried. Mayor called for a short recess. Approval of Consent Agenda Miron made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the following Consent Agenda: 1. Approve Claims Roster 2. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Rick Kieffer 3. Approve Resignation of Planning Commissioner Maria Mulvihill 4. Approve Resignation of Planning Commissioner David Fry 5. Approve Scott Arcand as an Interim Planning Commissioner 6. Approve Advertisement for Commissioners 7. Approve Reimbursement of Costs for Expert Services Related to DNR Groundwater Model 8. Approve Auto-Aid Agreement Between the City of Hugo and Centennial Fire District 9. Approve Resolution Approving Site Plan for Oneka Elementary 10. Approve Encroachment Agreement for 13123 Fondant Trail North – Rogers 11. Approve Encroachment Agreement for 13397 Fondant Trail North – Venerzzo 12. Approve Encroachment Agreement for 13455 Fondant Trail North - Schneider 13. Approve Pay Request No. 9 for Schreiber Mullaney for Lions Park Building 14. Approve Donation of Land on Education Drive and Falcon Circle from Barbara N Hanson Trust All Ayes. Motion carried. Approve Claims Roster Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Claims Roster as presented. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 16, 2022 Page 4 of 10 Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Rick Kieffer Rick Kieffer was re-hired by the City of Hugo on May 31, 2005, returning after a short period of time in the private sector. Rick worked under the direction of Public Works Director Scott Anderson. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Rick Kieffer. Approve Resignation of Planning Commissioner Maria Mulvihill Planning Commissioner Maria Mulvihill had relocated to Hinkley, MN and had submitted her resignation from the Commission. Maria served since August, 2018, first on the Board of Appeals and Adjustments, then on the Planning Commission as an alternate, and then as a regular Planning Commissioner since January of this year. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the resignation of Planning Commissioner Maria Mulvihill effective immediately. Approve Resignation of Planning Commissioner David Fry Planning Commissioner David Fry had relocated to the Mahtomedi, MN and had submitted his resignation from the Commission. David had served on the Commission since being appointed in August, 2018. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the resignation of David Fry from the Planning Commission effective immediately. Approve Scott Arcand as an Interim Planning Commissioner Scott Arcand had served on the Planning Commission from July, 2009, to December, 2021, and currently served as an alternate on the Board of Zoning Adjustments since being appointed in January of this year. With the resignation of Kim Luchsinger in February and the recent resignation of Commissioners Mulvihill and Fry, Scott had agreed to serve in the interim until regular members were appointed. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the appointment of Scott Arcand to serve as an Interim Planning Commissioner. Approve Advertisement for Commissioners On the Planning Commission there were three vacancies in the regular member positions and one vacancy in the alternate position. In addition, there was a vacancy on the Parks Commission as an alternate and three vacancies on the Historical Commission. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the advertisement for commissioners to fill these vacancies. Approve Reimbursement of Costs for Expert Services Related to DNR Groundwater Model Following Judge Marrinan’s order concerning the White Bear Lake Level matter, the DNR revised the appropriation permits for a number of cities and other entities. The affected cities appealed the permit amendments. The appeals were being scheduled for hearings before an administrative law judge. Lawyers representing various cities had advised that an expert be retained to review and test the DNR’s groundwater model. Depending on how many cities participate, the total cost could Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 16, 2022 Page 5 of 10 amount to several thousand dollars. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approve the City Attorney’s recommendation to authorize the expert services. Approve Auto-Aid Agreement Between the City of Hugo and Centennial Fire District Fire Chief Jim Compton, Jr., had requested approval to enter into an Automatic Mutual Aid Agreement between the City of Hugo and the Centennial Fire District to make equipment, personnel and other resources available to their respective fire departments. Each party would authorize the other party to provide assistance. Also, if either party received notice of a reported structure or building fire within the coverage areas of the other party, that party would automatically dispatch assistance to the scene without waiting for a request for assistance from the other party. The automatic dispatch may include an engine, crew, and a chief officer if he or she is available. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Reciprocal Emergency Services Agreement between the City of Hugo and the Centennial Fire District. Approve Resolution Approving Site Plan for Oneka Elementary The White Bear Lake School District had requested site plan approval of an approximately 10,000 square foot addition to the existing Oneka Elementary School located at 4888 Heritage Parkway North. At its April 28, 2022, meeting the Planning Commission considered the request and unanimously recommended the City Council approve the resolution approving the site plan. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved RESOLUTION 2022-26 APPROVING A SITE PLAN REQUEST FROM WHITE BEAR LAKE AREA SCHOOLS TO ALLOW AN ADDITION ON THE EXISTING ONEKA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL LOCATED AT 4888 HERITAGE PARKWAY NORTH. Approve Encroachment Agreement for 13123 Fondant Trail North - Rogers Benjamin and Michelle Rogers had requested an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 13123 Fondant Trail North. Senior Engineering Technician Liz Finnegan had reviewed the location of the fence and was comfortable with the request. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved RESOLUTION 2022-27 APPROVING AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR BENJAMIN AND MICHELLE ROGERS TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A FENCE WITHIN A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13123 FONDANT TRAIL NORTH. Approve Encroachment Agreement for 13397 Fondant Trail North - Venerzzo Kevin and Rachael Venerzzo had requested an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 13397 Fondant Trail North. Senior Engineering Technician Liz Finnegan had reviewed the location of the fence and was comfortable with the request. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved RESOLUTION 2022- 28 APPROVING AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A FENCE WITHIN A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13397 FONDANT TRAIL NORTH. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 16, 2022 Page 6 of 10 Approve Encroachment Agreement for 13455 Fondant Trail North - Schneider Justin and Shannon Schneider had requested an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 13455 Fondant Trail North. Senior Engineering Technician Liz Finnegan had reviewed the location of the fence and was comfortable with the request. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved RESOLUTION 2022-29 APPROVING AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A FENCE WITHIN A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13455 FONDANT TRAIL NORTH. Approve Pay Request No. 9 for Schreiber Mullaney for Lions Park Building Schreiber Mullaney had submitted Pay Request No. 9 for the new Pavilion in Lions Park in the amount of $337,308.90. The quantities completed to date had been reviewed and agreed upon by the architect, contractor and City staff. The amount indicated above reflected the work certified through April 25, 2022 with a 5% retainage applied. The total retainage being held to date would be $148,505.08. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved payment in the amount of $337,308.90 to Schreiber Mullaney Construction for the construction of the City of Hugo Lions Park Pavilion. Approve Donation of Land on Education Drive and Falcon Circle from Barbara N Hanson Trust Barbara N Hanson had requested to donate a lot in the Waters Edge Subdivision to the City of Hugo. This property was owned by the Barbara N Hanson Trust. The lot is .17 acres in size and located on the southeast corner of Education Drive and Falcon Circle. Staff had no immediate plans for the property. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the donation of land located in Waters Edge from Barbara N Hanson. Approve Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids for the Oneka Parkway Project At its February 7, 2022, meeting, Council had authorized staff to prepare plans and specifications for the 2022 Oneka Parkway Improvement Project. City Engineer Mark Erichson explained the project consisted of road and sidewalk improvements, replacement of curb and gutter, and storm sewer repair. Improvements outside of the assessment area include construction of turn lanes and installation of a traffic signal at the intersection of Oneka Parkway and CSAH 8. Plans were prepared and ready to be advertised for bidding. Bids would be opened and contract awarded in June, 2022. A neighborhood open house would take place after that, and construction would begin in July. Miron appreciated the signaled intersection and turn lane upgrades, and he noted that absent of this project, the signal would not be going in at this time. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 16, 2022 Page 7 of 10 Klein made motion, Petryk seconded, to approve RESOLUTION 2022-30 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS 2022 ONEKA PARKWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECT. All Ayes. Motion carried. Review Premier Bank Sketch Plan Premier Bank had requested informal comments on a sketch plan for commercial development on a 0.76-acre parcel for a 4,368 square foot bank with a drive-through. The property is currently occupied by a residential home on the northwest corner of 147th Street and Highway 61. The property was zoned Future Central Business (FCB) and located in the area of the City where development is guided by the Downtown Plan and Design Guidelines. The applicant was proposing to rezone the property to Central Business (C-1) to accommodate a commercial use. The applicant was also proposing a drive-through lane for the commercial business. Community Development Director Rachel Juba reviewed the plan which showed access off Flay Avenue, parking on the west side, and a drive-through lane that wrapped around the building counter clockwise to a canopy along Highway 61. The property was in an area identified as the Downtown Central Business District in the Downtown Plan that was adopted in 2007. She explained the guidelines for downtown development was a mixed use of buildings. Auto- dominated development was discouraged and a drive-through was auto oriented. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guided the property as Mixed Use, which encouraged parcels to be consolidated for well planned development with transitions between uses. The zoning of the property was Future Central Business that allowed for residential uses until the landowner made an application for development. The applicant was proposing to rezone to Central Business for the commercial use and would also need a Conditional Use Permit for the drive-through and a variance for drive-through stacking. If the drive-through was approved, any future business with a drive-through could located on the property. Prior to 2003, all properties in the area were zoned commercial, which made the homes non- conforming so they were unable to add on to the homes, refinance, or sell. Residents petitioned to rezone to FCB district. Juba stated it was unclear from the minutes from that time whether it was intended to be master planned or parcels redeveloped individually. She recommended the Planning Commission hold a neighborhood meeting to provide the property owners background on the zoning and information on how the area might develop. Juba provided details of the sketch plan noting that a drive-through business could be loud and disruptive in a residential zoning district. The applicant said they would use landscaping but staff was unsure how well it would block the noise. She reviewed the design guidelines that stated buildings should be oriented toward the street. The sketch plans showed the building more central to the site, and the Hardwood Creek Trail limited how close they could be to the street. Access should also be off a collector road, so staff would want access off 147th Street. Since it abutted TH61, MnDOT would need to review the plan. She said staff had not evaluated the new renderings, and the design guidelines required specific architecture they would need to meet. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 16, 2022 Page 8 of 10 The Planning Commission had reviewed the sketch plan at its April 28, 2022, meeting and agreed it needed to meet the Downtown Design Guidelines and agreed the bank was a good use for the property. Some commissioners were okay with the access off Flay, and they discussed transitions between land use. There were questions on rezoning to C1 and they made a recommendation to have a neighborhood meeting to be sure the property owners understood. They were okay with the drive-through but did not want to see a fast food or high traffic business there. Joel Houle, president of Premier Bank Hugo Branch, talked about his commitment to Hugo saying it was a family-owned bank and they had outgrown their current site. He talked about his time as an EDA Commissioner and how there was always talk about downtown redevelopment. Chad Haller, from 10K Architecture, showed a presentation with different variations in architecture of Premier Bank building saying they did not have a corporate brand and wanted to build something that was harmonious with the site. He said he hoped to maintain the trees on the north side of the site and possibly an amenity with a bike rack and bench seating on the south side of the building. He said he liked the prairie style architecture with a low profile and bigger overhangs that would feel more residential. The bank building would have brick at the base and stone at the entryways with lots of glass. The trash enclosure would be on the north side of the building. Kline said the drive-through wrapped around bank which seems typical and safe. He said the hours of operation would likely stay the same so not a lot of traffic flow. He asked about their ATM. Houle said the hours would be 8-5 and not weekends. Even prior to COVID they saw traffic in the lobby going down and about ten cars per day in the drive-through. He said there were a lot of problems with standalone ATMs, so if they had one, it would be inside the building. Miron asked about the tenant space. Joel replied they would look for a complimentary type of tenant, and they only wanted to build once in case of expansion. Weidt said he thought the entrance should come off 147th since the residential homes won’t be redeveloping soon. He had no problem with the use and looked forward to seeing them grow in the community. Klein said he didn’t see problems with access off Flay Avenue since there would not be high traffic. He said it would be helpful to see a neighborhood meeting. He asked about just rezoning this site to C-1, and not the whole area. He pointed out there were multiple variances granted for auto parts store to make that work, and he wanted to see this work since they had been in the community for 15 years, and it was a good location for them Petryk agreed with Klein. The Council made it work with Subway and O’Reilly. There were issues with zoning, and she remembered challenges when the neighborhood was rezoned to multi-use for the residents. She said a good start would be to have a neighborhood meeting. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 16, 2022 Page 9 of 10 Miron agreed and thought they did a good job in putting the concept together. It was a sketch plan that would evolve, and there was still work to be done. He said he liked the general direction and agreed with the Mayor there were some access issues to look at. He said this zoning district had existed for a long time and agreed with Petryk on holding a neighborhood meeting. Strub said he thought a bank would be an excellent business for this corner but was concerned about what may come after it because of the drive-through. He said he would like to keep the business in town and thought it was a good start for the downtown area. He didn’t think a bank would be an issue on Flay Avenue but the next business may. He had attended the Planning Commission meeting and knew the applicant was working to make it a good design. Bear said there would be a formal notice that would go to the residents if there was a formal request to rezone. It would first go to the Planning Commission and then the City Council. Miron made motion, Klein seconded, to schedule a neighborhood meeting. All ayes. The Mayor allowed residents in the audience to comment. Former Council Member Frank Puleo wanted to clear up the discussion on when the property was rezoned to future business and what the Council thought at that time. He said three of five council members were there today (he, Becky Petryk, and Mike Granger) and he wasn’t speaking for them, but he did not recall any indication that it could not be individual businesses. He pointed out that variances had been given to other area businesses. Puleo said he went to the bank every day because he banks there, and there was no issue parking or in the drive-through. Only one other time was there a car in front of him. He mainly wanted to say, as a member of the council that approved the zoning, he did not recall any indication that one developer needed to do it all. Jeff Marier, 14792 Flay Avenue, said he was directly to the northwest of the property, and he did not see the traffic flow being an issue. With the development of the park and stuff going on at all hours, he could not see a better fit and did not see an issue with the access on Flay Avenue. Former Council Member Mike Granger, echoed what Puleo said about being on the Council during the zoning. He said he never thought it needed to be master planned. It was expected single business would go there. The drive-through was something that needed to be done and he would hate to see them leave the community. The drive-through would be very minimal considering the noise from the traffic there, and the prairie style fits with the location. The Mayor said he appreciated the comments. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for May 16, 2022 Page 10 of 10 City Administrator Performance Review on June 6, 2022 – Reminder Council was reminded they had scheduled the City Administrator’s performance review for June 6, 2022, at 6 p.m. The regular Council meeting would follow at 7 p.m. Adjournment Miron Made motion, Klein seconded, to adjourn at 8:55 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Michele Lindau, City Clerk 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North, Hugo, MN 55038 (651) 762-6300 www.ci.hugo.mn.us TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director DATE: June 2, 2022 SUBJECT: Hiring of Seasonal Public Works Employees At the second council meeting in April, the City Council approved the hiring of four summer seasonal employees. At that time, staff was continuing to look for a fifth summer seasonal. Since then, one of the previously hired seasonal employees, Russ Pastorious, decided not to come work for the City. Staff recently received applications from two people. Staff is recommending Council approval to hire these two individuals. With the approval, the total number of seasonal employees would be at the budgeted five positions. Seasonal Public Works Employees assist with mowing, garbage/litter removal, park maintenance, boulevard maintenance and general public works maintenance. The following is a list of the seasonal employees that staff is recommending for hiring: Anthony Jorgenson Samuel Larsen Please contact me if you have any further questions or concerns. 1     Special Event Permit - Memorandum To: Hugo City Council From: City Clerk Michele Lindau Date: June 1, 2022, for City Council Meeting on June 6, 2022 Re: Special Event Permit for Tough Mudder at Wild Wings on July 9-10, 2022 1. BACKGROUND: Tough Mudder has submitted an application for a Special Event Permit to hold a two- day endurance sport event at Wild Wings Game Farm on July 9-10. Tough Mudder is a for profit company that has held events in the US since 2010 and elsewhere in the world since 2016. This will be the sixth year the event has been held at Wild Wings. This requires a Special Event Permit approved by Council because there will be an estimated 5,200 people on site on Saturday and 1,600 on Sunday, impacts to public streets, use of an amplified sound system, and alcohol served. 2. DESCRIPTION OF EVENT: Participants have the option of three daytime events to run ranging between 3-10 miles consisting of a variety of obstacles. Saturday’s event will run from 7 a.m. to 6 p.m. and Sunday’s event will be from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. The event will be held as outlined below and in the accompanying application. • Parking and Impacts to traffic The applicant has hired a team to specifically manage parking operations including lot layout, signage, and directing of cars. All pre-purchased tickets include money collected for parking, so there will be no collecting onsite. Parking will take place on the Atkinson parcel located on the south side of 147th . During the events, Hyde Ave. and Irish Ave. between 140th Street and 152nd Street will be open for medical vehicles and residents only. All other traffic will be diverted to Homestead Ave. Additionally, 147th St. will run eastbound only from Homestead Ave to Irish Ave. All road closures and main access points will be staffed by Washington County Sheriff’s Department.  Cost Participation in the event requires registration and payment of $25-$144 per person based on event and a tiered pricing schedule dependent on when registration takes 2     place. With the exception of food and beverages purchased onsite, all costs for parking and bag-drop will be paid for online during registration. Spectators will pay $15 and usually purchase tickets in advance, but some onsite sales will be done by credit card at the service tent. • Course Construction and Structures Set up for the event will be between June 30th and July 8th, and during these dates no construction will take place after 7 p.m. or before 7 a.m. that generates light or noise that can be heard off the property. The applicant has provided the City construction plans for all obstacles that will be reviewed by the Building Department. There will be a base area to include approximately 14 tents ranging in size from 120-900 square feet. These tents will be professionally installed and anchored. Banners will be hung on each tent identifying its purpose such as food and beverage, bag drop, information, etc. Inflatables will also be located in this area as well as a sound system. The volumes will not be loud enough to conflict with each other and will be on from 7 a.m. to approximately 6 p.m. each day. • Food and Beverages Food will be sold from licensed food vendors that will be located in the base area. Food trucks booked so far are ones that were used last year: Sizzling Wagon (pizza), Mario's Italian Kitchen (rice bowls), and Thai Thai Street Food. Water will be available for free in the base area and at five locations throughout the course. Tough Mudder will contract with the Hugo Lions Club to serve beer provided Lake Monster Brewing. Race participants will receive one free beer with the registration if they are 21+ years of age. Identification will be checked and wristbands will be used. Two deputies will be located in the base area where alcohol is served. The Hugo Lions Club has applied for a temporary liquor license with the City of Hugo and will provide insurance with the City being listed as additionally insured. • Bathroom Facilities/Rinsing Area/Waste Management Jimmy Johns will be providing 45+ portable restroom units on site, as well as four ADA units. There will also be sanitation sink stations available near the restrooms. These units will be cleaned and serviced overnight for use the next day. Water will be pumped from ponds on the property, placed in a frac tank to be treated, then brought to a location where participants will be able to rinse after completing the course. Water being used for obstacles will also be treated. Signs will be located in the rinsing area alerting users that the water is non potable, unsafe for drinking. They will be contracting for dumpster service. Staff of approximately ten employees per day will be present to pick up litter and empty trash bins. Trash bins and dumpsters will be located throughout the site and will be emptied regularly. • 3     • Wetland Impacts The applicant will meet with staff to review possible impacts to wetlands. Following the event, an inspection will be done and a recommendation will be made on how to restore any affected areas if necessary. • Security Tough Mudder will be contracting for security services. In addition, there will be Washington County deputies hired to provide overnight security and be present during the event. Two Washington County Deputies will be present during the entire event in the area where beer is sold. • Medical/Incident Management Tough Mudder has contracted with M Health Fairview for two ALS units to be on site during the event. On site medical care will also be conducted by Event Medic Services (EMS) that is responsible for staffing qualified medical personnel. There will be five medical rover teams with two EMT per team that will be on ATVs throughout the course. Emergency vehicle access points have been identified as well as a helicopter landing area. Tough Mudder has stated they have a well-established and tested command, control, and communication structures to deal with incidents efficiently and effectively. All staff in management or supervisory roles will be issued a radio, and an Event Command Center will be in operation throughout the event. Emergency Action Plans have been developed for several specific scenarios, and training exercises are conducted prior to the event that require implementation of the Emergency Action Plans. The Hugo Fire Department and Washington County Sheriff’s Office had reviewed the plans and found them to be acceptable. • Escrow It has not been determined what, if any, services will be required from the City. Tough Mudder organizers are aware that, if services from the City are necessary, an escrow in an amount to cover these cost will be submitted prior to the event. 3. REQUIREMENTS: The applicant has provided the City the completed permit. In accordance with this permit, the applicant shall conduct the event as described in the application material in addition to the following: Prior to the Event 1. The applicant shall obtain all required permits from Washington County related to placing signage in the road right-of-way. 4     2. The applicant will seek approval from the City for signage in the road right-of-way. 3. The applicant will obtain consent from property owners prior to placing signage on private property. 4. The applicant will provide the City with an updated contact list. 5. Notices will be mailed to residents on Irish Avenue, Hyde Avenue, Homestead Avenue, and 147th St. informing them of the event. This notice will be approved by City staff prior to sending. 6. Signs will be located in the rinsing area that alerts participants that the water is non- potable, unsafe for drinking. 7. No construction will take place after 7 p.m. or before 7 a.m. that generates lights or noise that can be heard off the property. 8. The applicant shall obtain an electrical permit and pay all permit fees. 9. A pre-event walk through of the site will be conducted by City staff, Fire Department Personnel, and Electrical Inspector. 10. Tough Mudder will comply with any recommendations made by the City, Washington County Sheriff’s Department and/or the Hugo Fire Department. 11. The applicant will meet with the City’s wetland specialists to determine impacts to wetlands on the site and whether a permit is necessary. 12. All tents, inflatables, structures will be securely staked. 13. The applicant will comply with all requirements of the City’s Building Official regarding obstacles used as part of the event. 14.  A temporary On-Sale Liquor License will be obtained by the Hugo Lions Club for the selling and serving of alcohol and all liquor laws will be adhered to. 15. The applicant will secure the specified number of Washington County Deputies to be present during the event. 16. Payment to Washington County Sheriff’s Department shall be prepared prior to the event and checks delivered to the supervisor officer on duty the day of the event. 17. Prior to the event, a deposit will be paid to the Lions Club for liquor, and the balance and a donation in an amount agreeable to the Club will be paid within 45 days of the event completion. 18. Tough Mudder will consult with the Lions Club for the arrangement of the workspace for liquor sales and parking. During the Event 19. The applicant shall conduct the event in accordance with the approved plans submitted with the application. 5     20. The applicant and all on-site vendors shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, rules, regulations, and ordinances related to the Tough Mudder Event. 21. All roads will remain open to local traffic with the exception of 147th Street between the parking area on the Atkinson property and Irish Avenue. 22. Parking and traffic procedures will take place as indicated with submittal of the application. 23. The applicant shall comply with all recommendations from the Hugo Fire Department and Washington County Sheriff’s Office regarding security and safety. 24. Weather conditions will be monitored during the event and delays/cancellations will be determined by the opinions of medical, security and/or police staff. 25. There shall be vehicle access to all areas of the event for response to emergencies. 26. Garbage receptacles shall be regularly emptied and the event site, streets, and parking areas kept clear of debris. 27. All activities associated with the event including, but not limited to, all outdoor stage performances, amplified sounds, food and beverage service, shall end by 6:00 p.m. 28. No alcohol is permitted to be brought on site or taken off site. After the Event 29. All affected wetland areas will be restored. 30. All garbage shall be removed from the event property, streets, and parking areas and properly disposed of at the close of the event. 31. All temporary structures placed on the event property specifically for the Tough Mudder Event shall be taken down by no later than Friday, July 15, 2022. 32. All signage visible from a public street will be removed immediately after the close of the event. General Requirements and Prohibitions 33. No camping will be allowed on the event property. 34. No fireworks are permitted for this event. 6     CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff has worked with the event organizers, who have agreed to the above requirements. Staff believes that, though there may be slight traffic delays, the event is well organized and can be held with minimal impact to the health, safety, and welfare of Hugo residents and its visitors. Staff recommends Council approve the event subject to the condition in this memorandum. Minor changes to this permit may be approved by City staff. Changes staff deems to be significant will require Council review and approval. Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan Wild Wings of Oneka 9491 152nd Street, Hugo, MN 55038 Saturday July 9 & Sunday July 10, 2022 Recipients shall hold and treat the Confidential Information in strict confidence and shall not, without the prior written consent of the Tough Mudder Inc, disclose or permit disclosure of Confidential Information by their Representatives.Recipients agree not to use or derive benefit from the Confidential Information in any manner whatsoever, in whole or in part, other than in connection with the Transaction.  Moreover, Recipients agree to disclose Confidential Information only to those Representatives who have a need to know the Confidential Information in order to assist in evaluating a possible Transaction, and who are 1 Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan informed of the strictly confidential nature of the Confidential Information.  Recipients shall be responsible for any breach of this Agreement by their Representatives. 2/16 Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan Table of Contents Event Operations Plan 1 Table of Contents 2 Introduction 4 Contact List 4 Event Attendance and Timeline 4 Venue Summary 5 Phases of Operation 5 Event Stakeholders 6 Radio Communication 6 Communication Chart 7 Safety 8 COVID-19 8 Occupational Health and Safety 8 Power and Fuel 8 Medical Arrangements 8 Incident Management 9 Parking and Traffic 10 Course 12 Festival Area and Services 12 Food and Alcohol Services 13 Security and Credentials 13 Waste Management and Disposal 14 Logistics 14 Technology 14 Appendix B: Course Map 15 Appendix C:Festival Area Map 16 Appendix D: COVID-19 Site Changes 17 3/16 Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan Introduction Tough Mudder is a 8-10 mile course featuring 20+ military style obstacles designed to test participants’ all around strength, stamina, and mental grit. Tough Mudder is not a timed race - we stress the importance of camaraderie and teamwork, encouraging everyone to help each other complete all obstacles and finish the course. Our events have been taking place since 2010 in the United States. In 2019, Tough Mudder held over 60 events throughout the United States, Canada, the United Kingdom, Australia, Mexico and Asia. The number of events and locations will continue to grow in 2022. To date, Tough Mudder is proud to have helped raise over $12 million dollars for charities around the world. Contact List Role Name Organization Phone Director of Live Events Evert Sers Tough Mudder 415-307-0436 Producer AJ Monette Tough Mudder 757-339-2849 Operations Manager Aron Hagberg Tough Mudder 646-429-2079 Event Construction Manager Sam Russ Tough Mudder 802-451-8570 Logistics Manager Mike Barron Tough Mudder 586-484-0100 Venue Jeff Hughes Wild Wings of Oneka 612-590-2641 Medical Operations Manager Rob Militello Emergency Medical Services 312-882-2160 Police TBC Fire TBC CVB TBC Event Attendance and Timeline Below is a brief overview of the event timeline and attendance: Saturday Sunday Date July 9,2022 July 10, 2022 First Start Wave 7:45 AM 8:00 AM Last Start Wave 2:45 PM 11:45 AM Event Operating Hours 7:00 AM – 6:00 PM 7:00 AM – 5:00 PM Participants 4,800 1,400 Total On-Site (Inc Spectators)5,200 1,600 Venue Summary Name Wild Wings of Oneka Address 9491 152nd Street, Hugo, MN 55038 Size Approx. 250 Acres for Course Approx. 5 Acres for Festival Area Primary Contact Jeff Hughes Phone Number 612-590-2641 Relevant Event Permits Special Events Application, Alcohol Beverage License 4/16 Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan Phases of Operation The planning process for the Tough Mudder Event Operations team begins approximately five months prior to the event weekend. The following table outlines the phases in which the team plans and executes the event. Phase Description Date Site Visit and Course Design Initial visit by Event Operations Team to meet stakeholders and plan all aspects of the event, including parking, traffic, Festival Area, course, and construction. March 12-14, 2022 Load In Period in which the venue will receive deliveries, set up temporary infrastructure, mark the course route, load in vendors/sponsors, construct Festival Area and course obstacles. June 29, 2022 Event Operations Event weekend when all participants, spectators, and workforce are on-site. 7/9 7am to 6pm 7/10 7am to 5pm Load Out Monday and Tuesday following the event, the Event Operations Team will break down temporary infrastructure and oversee removal of rental equipment and trash. July 11-14, 2022 Site Restoration Period in which obstacles are removed and site restoration work is carried out. Timeline TBD with venue and Construction Manager Event Stakeholders Participants All patrons running the Tough Mudder course. All participants must be 18 or older, or 13 - 17 with a chaperone to take part in the event. Spectators All patrons viewing the Tough Mudder course. Spectator routes are marked with wayfinding signs to watch obstacles and take photographs of those participating in the event. Workforce All volunteers, independent contractors, temporary labor, and Tough Mudder staff on-site during the event week and weekend to support the operation of the event. Venue <Venue Contact> will act as Tough Mudder’s main point of contact for all venue related questions. Vendors Contractors and suppliers that provide services/equipment for the event. Partner Activations Official Tough Mudder Partners on both the local and national level will be present in the Festival Area. Police Tough Mudder has informed the local police of the Parking and Traffic Management Plan and will refine it to ensure compliance by all parties. Emergency Serv ice Prov iders Tough Mudder’s Safety Operations Director, Brendan Quinn will contact local EMS and Fire regarding the weekend’s medical operation to ensure they are kept in the loop or our operation. Community Groups Tough Mudder has worked with the CVB/COC to help with volunteer recruitment and local marketing opportunities. 5/16 Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan Radio Communication Well established and tested radio communication structures are being implemented to ensure that Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 runs smoothly, and that any issues and/or incidents which do arise can be dealt with efficiently and effectively. ●Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 will be delivered by an integrated event team, led by the Event Director. Key event operations roles have been identified and will be filled by experienced individuals. Position Descriptions for these roles clearly outline responsibilities and reporting channels. A similar staffing model has been used successfully at many previous Tough Mudder events. ●Tough Mudder follows the Incident Command System (ICS): a systematic tool used for the command, control, and coordination of emergency responses. ●All staff in a management or supervisory role will be issued a radio. A number of radio channels will be used, with radio users logically assigned to one of these channels according to their role. The ‘lead’/manager on each channel will carry a second radio, and will be linked with other ‘leads’ on the ‘Control’ radio channel. All channels will be monitored by a person filling the role of ‘Control’, who will have the capacity to pass information to relevant individuals on any radio channel. ●An Event Command Center (ECC) will be established and will operate for the duration of the event. The ECC will be managed by ‘Control’, a role responsible for monitoring radio channels and disseminating information to relevant parties. Control will have the capability to contact key members of the event team, including the Event Director, the event’s medical providers and other emergency services providers at any time. ●A comprehensive contact list containing contact details for all relevant stakeholders and emergency service providers has been compiled and distributed to the event team, and will be available in the ECC for the duration of the event. ●An organizational chart has been produced for the event, clearly identifying the chain-of-command amongst core members of the Event Team; this organizational chart also serves to illustrate Tough Mudder’s communication structure, identifying the various radio channels that will be used during the event, and the roles/individuals using each channel. Protocols on the use of radios have been developed and all staff have been trained on them. 6/16 Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan Communication Chart Up to 100 radios will be used during the event, and will be stored and charged and distributed in the Logistics Field Warehouse. Chargers, spare batteries, ear pieces, antennas and hand mics have been scoped. A Radio Repeater will be installed on site to enable long-distance radio communications. 7/16 Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan Safety The health and safety of all participants, spectators, staff and others on-site throughout Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 is a priority of the Event Team. Responsibility for managing incidents across the event site rests with the Tough Mudder Event Team, led by the Event Producer. Occupational Health and Safety Tough Mudder uses the following protocol to make sure the event site is as safe as possible and to minimize the risk of harm to any individual: ●Guidelines have been developed and will be implemented at the event, including: o Loading and Unloading Vehicles o Setting Up and Packing Down Infrastructure o Use of Utility Terrain Vehicles (UTVs) ●In the event of an incident, one or more experienced team members have been designated as ‘safety officer’ to assist in the management of the incident. ●A series of checks are carried out to ensure the site is safe before gates are opened to participants and spectators. Power and Fuel Approximate power usage: 12 x 2000W generators, 2 x 3000W generators and 30 x 6000W light towers. Said generators will be gas or diesel powered. All fuel cells will be stored on/in leak proof containment pans or storage. Medical Arrangements Tough Mudder events attract large numbers of people and are physically challenging by their nature. Tough Mudder maintains an International Safety Committee, which is responsible for assessing risks and establishing mitigation measures at all obstacles on the course. On-site medical care at Tough Mudder events is conducted by Event Medic Services (EMS), who are responsible for recruitment and dispatch of EMTs, paramedics, lifeguards, and other medical professionals involved in the event. While participants and spectators are on site, a consistent medical presence is maintained. Every Tough Mudder event will include a fully staffed and fully stocked medical tent, which will provide basic lifesaving care. Medical personnel ranging from first responders to paramedics are stationed at various locations around the course. Every event will have five medical rover teams with two EMTs each. These rovers will circulate the course in pre-identified zones to provide emergency care, transport injured participants, and otherwise monitor the safety of the course. Every rover is equipped with a backboard, stoke basket, and automated external defibrillator. 8/16 Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan Tough Mudder will contract with local ambulance providers at each venue to ensure ALS-level coverage for significant injuries or medical emergencies. The ambulance contracts are typically executed about 30 days before the event date. Information about each event's ambulance provider, the event Incident Action Plan, and further details can be provided on request 30 days from the event. Additional information on Medical Arrangements can be found in the attached OCR Emergency Medical Action Plan. Incident Management The following measures have been put in place to ensure that any incident that does occur is quickly identified and responded to in an efficient and effective manner: ●Emergency Action Plans (EAPs) have been developed for a number of specific scenarios, and event team staff have been briefed on how to respond if such incidents occur. ●Key Event Operations Roles have been identified for the event, responsibilities for each role have been clearly defined, and each role will be filled by an experienced Tough Mudder staff member. ●Details of all major incidents will be logged in the ECC by ‘Control’ or a logger on a real-time basis, ensuring an up-to-date record of what has occurred, actions taken in response, and relevant timings. ●A number of medical staff as well as 2-3 ambulances will be on site throughout the event. ●The local Police and Fire Departments have been informed about the event and appropriate contacts have been identified should additional assistance be required on site. ●Emergency vehicle access points and a helicopter landing area have been identified for the site and included in plans, should these be required. ●Incident Report Forms are available on site and all staff will be instructed to complete these for any incidents they witness/report. ●A Tough Mudder Operations Executive will be on-duty at all times during the event (potentially off-site), and will be available to assist in arranging additional support for and providing guidance to the Event Director if required. Further details about incident management arrangements will be available in the following documents upon request: ●Emergency Action Plans o Death or Serious Injury; o Obstacle Failure or Collapse; o Major Traffic Incident; o Severe Weather; o Evacuation; 9/16 Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan o Emergency Vehicle Access and Helicopter Landing Area Plan Parking and Traffic The means by which participants, spectators and staff travel to and from the venue is a key element of planning for all Tough Mudder events. A comprehensive Parking and Traffic Plan* has been developed for Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022, addressing on-site parking, the flow of vehicles into and out of the venue, required signage and traffic management, contingency plans, and staffing requirements. The following tables outline key information regarding Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022’s Parking and Traffic plans: Saturday Sunday Participant Start Waves 7:45 AM – 1:45 PM 200 every 15 minutes 9:00 AM – 12:00 PM 200 every 15 minutes Total Cars Expected 2,200 Cars ●2,000 Participant ●175 Staff ●25 VIP 800 Cars ●600 Participant ●175 Staff ●25 VIP Spaces Available 3,220 On-Site 3,220 On-Site Ingress Hours 6:00 AM – 1:00 PM 7:00 AM – 11:00 AM Egress Hours 10:00 AM – 6:00 PM 11:00 AM – 4:00 PM Parking/Traffic Staff 8 staff 2 officers 8 staff 2 officers *Full Parking and Traffic Plan is available upon request. Course The following table provides a summary of the course for Twin Cities 2022: Length 9.5 Miles Obstacles/Features 30 Water Stations 6 Terrain Open fields, trail running, medium to moderate elevation gain. Estimated Completion Time First finisher expected to take 1 hour 45 min Average finisher expected to take 3.5 hours Slowest finisher expected to take up to 6 hours For a full course map, including obstacles, see Appendix B. 10/16 Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan Festival Area and Services The area in which participants start and finish the course is referred to as “Festival Area”. This area is also where a range of services will be available to all patrons throughout the event weekend. The following table provides a summary of the key services being provided: Check-In All participants and spectators will enter the Festival Area area through the check-in tent. All patrons must have a paid ticket accompanied by a signed waiver upon entry and will be given a wristband once processed. Ticket Sales/Information A Tough Mudder HQ employee and volunteers will staff the “Mudder Services” tent which handles day-of admissions, customer service questions, and lost and found. Bag Drop Participants will be able to check their belongings. Food & Beverage There will be a variety of food and non-alcoholic beverages for sale to all event attendees. There will also be beer for sale in the beer garden for those 21+. Merchandise We will have a tent setup with Tough Mudder apparel for sale. Giveaways Upon crossing the finish line, participants will receive giveaways such as product samples, t-shirt, and headband. Partner Activations Within the Festival Area, there will be a number of features sponsored by our local and national partners. Rinse Stations A rinse area will be available in the Festival Area. Entertainment Music will be played throughout the Festival Area via speakers for the duration of the event. There will also be an emcee at the Start Line and Finish Line. For a full Festival Area map, see Appendix C. Food and Alcohol Services Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 will have food, non-alcoholic beverages, and beer for sale to all patrons on-site during the event weekend. In addition to purchased items, there will be a number of samples and potable water available for participants on course. Food Concessionaire Various Food Trucks Alcohol Concessionaire/Non-Profit Group Lake Monster Brewing Co. Alcohol Service Hours Saturday: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM Sunday: 10:00 AM – 5:00 PM Product Sampling (Course and Finish Line)Bob’s Bars, Electrolytes, Bananas Potable Water Locations 6 – Course 4 – Festival Area Identification Checks: All participants and spectators wishing to enter the event area will be required to show ID at the registration tents prior to entering the Festival Area. They’ll be given an identifiable wristband indicating they are over 21, and this wristband will be checked at any point of sale. Roughly 87% of participants are 21+ years of age. Additional Checkpoints: In the event that a participant wearing a wristband may appear to be under the age of 21, an escort will be provided to allow the participant to retrieve his/her ID from the Bag 11/16 Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan Drop tent, and then return if age has been appropriately validated. All bartenders serving beer have the right to question and re-check identification for those who may look to be under age. Security and Credentials Tough Mudder has contracted with TBD to provide event security for Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022. Security staff will be on-site overnight throughout the week leading up to the event and during the event weekend.* Overnight Security is responsible for protecting assets from theft and managing access into the Festival Area and back of house areas. During the event, Security will be positioned at the Entrance/Exit point to ensure all patrons have a proper credential and at the Bag Drop tent to ensure there are no problems with theft. There will also be a supervisor on-site to help with any escalated issues. We will work with the local Police Department to determine additional event security requirements based on venue and permit requirements. *A full Security and Credential Plan is available upon request. Waste Management and Disposal Tough Mudder is committed to keeping event sites clean at all times. All waste generated by the event will be appropriately stored and removed from the site. Trash bins and dumpsters will be sourced for placement around the event site. These will be strategically positioned in areas where large amounts of waste are likely to be generated. Contract cleaning staff will be scoped and will be present on site throughout the weekend to perform litter picking and to empty trash bins. Dumpsters will be emptied at the conclusion of the event. The following is a summary of the Waste Management arrangements for the event: Waste Management Staffing Provider Express Staffing Waste Management Staff*8 Saturday 6 Sunday Dumpster Provider TBD Dumpsters On-Site 2 – 30 yd. Dumpsters for Festival Area 1 – 30 yd. Dumpster for Field Warehouse 3 – 20 yd. Dumpsters for Course Portable Toilet Provider Jimmy’s Johns Portable Toilets On-Site 30 – Festival Area 2 – Field Warehouse 15 – Course *A full Waste Management Staffing Plan is available upon request. 12/16 Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan Logistics A Logistics Compound and Field Warehouse will be established on site. All equipment and product required for the event will be delivered to the Logistics Compound. Receipt, distribution and recovery of all equipment/product will be managed by a dedicated Logistics Coordinator. Technology Laptops will be set-up in the Event Command Center and Event Operations Center for use by Tough Mudder staff. Internet access will be available through Tough Mudder owned technology equipment in order to service our Registration Platform, Active. Scanners will be used to check in participants and spectators and to assign participant numbers to the runners. This information is available in real time to those in the Event Command Center so information about all participants on course, including Emergency Contact Information, is readily available based on bib number. Staff working at the Mudder Services Tent in the Base Area will also have iPads in order to check in participants and troubleshoot any registration issues. 13/16 Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan Appendix A: Parking Plan *Parking Plan is Subject to Change* 14/16 Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan Appendix B: Course Map *Course Map is Subject to Change* 15/16 Tough Mudder Twin Cities 2022 Event Operations Plan Appendix C: Festival Area Map *Festival Map is Subject to Change* 16/16 Agenda Number G.10 CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Cathleen Pastorius - Request for a lot split for the property located at 5342 142nd Street North. DATE: June 2, 2022, for the City Council Meeting of June 6, 2022 ZONING: Single-family detached residential district (R-3) REVIEW DEADLINE: June 14, 2022 1. PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE: At its May 26, 2022, meeting the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the request. Staff recommended approval of the request. There was no one that spoke during the public hearing. The Planning Commission agreed that the request met the requirements necessary to approve the lot split. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the lot spilt to the City Council, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution. 2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a lot split to create two lots out of a 1.23 acre lot. The proposed lots are 0.73 acres and 0.50 acres. 3. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The properties to the west, south, and east are zoned as R-3 and guided as Low Density Residential in the 2040 Land Use Plan. The property to the north is zoned Central Business District (C-1) and guided at Mixed Use. The existing property was platted with the Oneka Estates residential development. B. Natural Characteristics of Site The property is generally flat and does not contain any wetlands. Pastorius Lot Split – 5342 142nd St N 4. ANALYSIS: A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City has limited discretion in approving or denying a minor subdivision or lot split application. The City’s discretion is limited to whether or not the proposed subdivision meets the standards outlined in the Comprehensive Land Use Regulations. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the subdivision. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Minor Subdivision Request Lot Size The R-3 zoning district requires a minimum lot size of 10,400 square feet and a minimum lot width at the front setback line of 80 feet. Both proposed lots meet the minimum standards outlined in the zoning code. Utilities The existing property is connected to City sewer and water. The new lot will be required to connect to City sewer and water and shall obtain any necessary permits. SAC and WAC charges will need to be paid with the connection to the utility mains at the time of building permit. Grading and Wetlands A grading plan will have to be submitted to the City prior to the issuance of a building permit for the proposed lot. The applicant shall demonstrate the building sites will comply with the City’s regulations regarding building elevation related to groundwater. A permit will need to be obtained from the City for the location of the new driveway. Prior to the issuance of any building permit the applicant shall demonstrate that the proposed home and buildings will not impact any wetlands. Park Dedication A park dedication fee is required for all land subdivided for residential purposes. The applicant will not be dedicating any parkland with this project and therefore is responsible for the parkland dedication fee, currently set at $3,400 per lot. The applicant is responsible to pay for the creation of one lot and shall pay the fee prior to recording the minor subdivision. Pastorius Lot Split – 5342 142nd St N Streets The proposed parcels have access to 142nd Street North. Sidewalks/Trails There are no trails planned for this area along 142nd Street North in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. 5. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommended approval the lot split for Cathleen Pastorius at 5342 142nd Street North subject to the conditions listed in the attached draft resolution to the Planning Commission. 6. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the lot spilt to the City Council, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Resolution 3. Engineer Memo 4. Survey 140th Street NorthFinale Avenue NorthFenway Avenue NorthFrenchman Road Ferrara Avenue North142nd Street North 141st Court North 141st Street North141s t Cir c l e Nor t hForest Boulevard NorthFrenchman Road 5342 142nd Street N Location Map Hugo, MN Site Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary ¯0 200Feet1 in = 200 feet Document Path: S:\Mapping\Emily\LocationSite Maps\2022\Pastorius Minor Sub 5342 142nd St.mxdSite RESOLUTION 2022-XX APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR CATHLEEN PASTORIUS FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 5342 142ND STREET NORTH WHEREAS, an application has been filed by Cathleen Pastorius that requests approval of a minor subdivision for property located at 5342 142nd Street North. WHEREAS, the subject property is legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Oneka Estates 2nd Addition, Washington County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said request at a duly called Public Hearing on May 12, 2022, and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the minor subdivision for Cathleen Pastorius, subject to the following conditions: 1. A minor subdivision is approved to allow the creation of two lots, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on March 21, 2022. 2. Prior to recording the minor subdivision: a. The park dedication shall be cash-in-lieu of dedication for a total of $3,400. 3. Prior to issuance of any building permit: a. The applicant shall obtain soil boring samples on site. b. The applicant shall provide a grading plan that reflects the current topography and proposed grading. c. The applicant shall demonstrate that the parcels are able to meet the Rice Creek Watershed District Rules. d. The applicant shall demonstrate the building sites will comply with the City’s regulations regarding building elevation related to groundwater. e. The applicant shall meet all other requirements outlined in the engineer memo dated May 4, 2022. ADOPTED by the City Council on June 6, 2022. ___________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk S:\Users\R_Juba\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\Pastorius Minor Sub - 5342 142nd St\020258-000 LTR RJuba- 142nd Lot Split 2022-05-04.docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM May 4, 2022 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Lot Split Review 5342 142nd Street Lot Split WSB Project No. 020258-000 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the submittal items for the lot split of parcel 5342 142nd Street located adjacent to Judicial Ditch 3. In particular, we have reviewed the following survey file related to this particular request: • 5342 142nd Street Survey (Pastorius_surv-11x17.pdf) dated 3/17/2022 by Pete Goers, PLS Based on the review of the above documents, we offer the following comments related to this application: 1. Soil borings should be obtained to confirm the current and historic groundwater elevation on site to determine regulatory freeboard conditions with respect to low floor elevations and low floor openings for any future buildings. 2. The applicant is proposing to install additional sanitary sewer and water services by connecting to the utility mains in 142nd Street to serve the new lot split portion. 3. Additional easement will need to be provided on the new lot to accommodate future maintenance of the existing utility services to the original lot. 4. SAC and WAC charges will need to be paid with the connection to the utility mains at the time of building permit. 5. Provide a grading plan that establishes a drainage swale that conveys drainage away from both building pads along the common lot line between them. 6. With the connection of the utilities, the roadway will need to be restored to the existing street section and additional bituminous may be required to be milled off to create a full width street patch. 7. With the building permit, provide a house type for the lot that includes the LFE, LOE, Garage Elevation, Driveway grade, etc. Ms. Rachel Juba May 4, 2022 Page 2 Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. Additional comments may be necessary following the review of the responses to these. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 612-419-3589. Sincerely, WSB Nick Guilliams, PE Senior Project Manager cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) 142ND STREET NORTHΔΔFERRARA AVENORTH Drawn By:Checked By:pastorius_surv.dwgPDGPDGDesign File:I hereby certify that this survey, plan, or report was prepared by me orunder my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed LandSurveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota.______________________________________Print Name______________________________________Signature______________________________________Date License NumberScale:1" = 50'12730 182nd Street NorthMarine on St. Croix, MN 55047(612)363-1804pdg44110@comcast.netPete Goers, PLSPROPOSED PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONSLot 1, Block 1, Oneka Estates 2nd Addition, Washington County, MinnesotaPARCEL 1:That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Oneka Estates 2nd Addition, according to therecorded plat thereof, Washington County, Minnesota, lying westerly of thefollowing described line:Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 1; thence North 42degrees 28 minutes 13 seconds West, along the northeasterly line ofsaid Lot 1, a distance of 191.10 feet to the point of beginning of the lineto be described; thence South 10 degrees 34 minutes 22 seconds Westa distance of 234.52 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 1 and thereterminating.PARCEL 2:Lot 1, Block 1, Oneka Estates 2nd Addition, according to the recorded platthereof, Washington County, Minnesota, EXCEPT that part lying westerly of thefollowing described line:Commencing at the most easterly corner of said Lot 1; thence North 42degrees 28 minutes 13 seconds West, along the northeasterly line ofsaid Lot 1, a distance of 191.10 feet to the point of beginning of the lineto be described; thence South 10 degrees 34 minutes 22 seconds Westa distance of 234.52 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 1 and thereterminating.Revisions:1.The orientation of this bearing system is based on the Washington CountyCoordinate System NAD83(1986 Adjustment).2.All distances are in feet.3.A portion of the property lies within Zone A (Special Flood Hazard Area subjectto flooding by the 1% annual chance flood, no base elevations determined) ofFederal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance CommunityPanel No. 27163C0136E, effective February 3, 2010.4.BENCHMARK: Top nut of fire hydrant on the south side of 142nd Street Northand 130 feet east of Ferrara Avenue North. Elevation = 934.00 NAVD 88PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONExisting parcel area: 53,407.6 sqft or 1.226 acresProposed Parcel 1 area: 31,738.4 sqft or 0.729 acresBuilding: 1,920.4 sqftImpervious: 5,158.6 sqft or 16.3%Proposed Parcel 2 area: 21,669.2 sqft or 0.497 acresBuildable area: 8,182.8 sqftMaximum building area: 6,500.7 sqft or 30%AREASSURVEYOR'S NOTESLEGENDPETER GOERS44110March 17, 2022 Agenda Number: G.12 CITY OF HUGO PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC –Preliminary Plat and PUD General Plan for a residential development to be known as “The Shores of Oneka Lake” DATE: June 2, 2022, for the City Council meeting of June 6, 2022 ZONING: Single Family Detached Residential (R-3) and Future Urban Service (FUS) LAND USE: Low Density Residential (LD) DEADLINE DATE: July 12, 2022 (120-days) 1. PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE: At its May 26, 2022, meeting the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the request. Staff recommended approval of the preliminary plat and PUD. There was one person that spoke during the public hearing. They had questions about tree removal and construction access for the development. The Planning Commission agreed that the request met the requirements necessary to approve the preliminary plat and PUD. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the preliminary plat and PUD, subject to the conditions in the resolutions. 2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) for a residential development. The property totals 131.66 acres and is comprised of three parcels. The preliminary plat includes 218 residential lots, and 10 outlots to be known as “The Shores of Oneka Lake”. The housing types are proposed to be a combination of single family homes, villa homes, and twinhomes. The villa homes and twinhomes will be maintenance provided for Page 2 mowing and snow removal. The applicant is showing 100 units of apartments in 5 separate buildings on Outlot C, but they are not part of this approval. A PUD amendment and PUD final Plat would need to be reviewed and approved, with a public hearing, prior to development of Outlot C and A. The PUD General Plan will be for all 131.66 acres of the property and is proposed to be rezoned to Planned Unit Development (PUD). The property includes wetlands and floodplain for a total buildable acreage of 95.99. The proposed density of the development is 2.27 units per net acre of property. The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility on the following: • Flexibility to allow various lot sized with a minimum lot size of 5,417 square feet, where 10,400 square feet is required. • Flexibility to allow various lot width with a minimum lot width of 52 feet, were 80 feet is required by ordinance. • Flexibility to allow a minimum front setback of 25 feet, where 30 feet is required. • Flexibility to allow various setbacks with a minimum side yard setback of 6 feet, where 10 feet is required. • Flexibility to allow a maximum impervious coverage of a lot to be 60% , where 50% is required. • Flexibility from the shoreland overlay district regulations. In exchange for this flexibility, the developer is: • Designing a more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of the standard R-3 zoning district or the shoreland overlay district regulations. • Providing public open space along Oneka Lake within the development, with improvements that exceed City standards. • Providing a public trail to connect to existing trails in the adjacent developments. Preserving natural features with the trail system that meanders through the development. • Providing a landscaping plan that exceeds City standards. • Preserving existing significant trees on the property. • Creating a stormwater reuse irrigation project within the development. • Incorporating architectural anti-monotony design guidelines for the homes in the development 3. BACKGROUND: A. Previous Sketch Plan Review The properties are generally located north of Goodview Avenue and east of Highway 61. The plan shows 218 proposed residential units, stormwater ponding areas, a public open space, Page 3 sidewalk and trail connections, and road connections. The applicant is proposing the project to be built in four phases. The developer has indicated that an HOA will be established for the development to maintain community areas, landscaping, and the water re-use system. The Planning Commission and City Council have reviewed a number of sketch plans for this property, including proposed developments named “Del Webb” and “Oneka Shores”. The previous projects were significantly larger and included additional property to the south and north of 165th Street. During the previous sketch plan review processes, the City discussed the importance of access to Highway 61 with the development and determining the proper intersection design. The City also encouraged the preservation of the natural resources, including a portion of the stand of trees on the southern area of the project. It is in staff’s opinion that the applicant has done a good job addressing the comments and concerns from the proposed sketch plan of the City Council, Commissions, and residents. B. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) Due to the size of the project, the previous applicant was required to complete an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed development on this site. The purpose of the EAW is to identify potential environmental impacts for a specific development and to determine whether or not a more extensive Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is required. Environmental impacts include impacts to surface waters, natural areas, utilities, transportation systems, historic sites, noise impacts, etc. The EAW for the proposed development of this site was completed in February 2006 and distributed to various agencies for public comment. The City Council reviewed the EAW and the comments received at their May 1, 2006 meeting and determined that an EIS was not needed for the project. Since this plan is similar, but smaller, a new EAW will not be required. However, as this project progresses, staff will need to ensure that the assumptions of the EAW are still valid. 4. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding land Use and Zoning The properties to the north is zoned General Commercial (COM), Single Family Detached Residential (R-3), and Future Urban Service (FUS) and guided as Commercial (COM) and Low Density Residential (LD) in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The parcels are vacant. The property to the east is Oneka Lake. The properties to the south are zoned Single Family Detached Residential (R-3) and are guided Low Density Residential (LD) in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The residential development to the south is the Oneka Ponds development. The properties to the Page 4 west are zoned General Commercial (C-2) and are guided Commercial (COM). The uses to the west are mostly industrial type uses, with some commercial uses. B. Natural Characteristics of Site The properties are currently vacant and do contain some challenges regarding an existing wetlands, drainage ditch, floodplain, and high ground water. The properties are relatively flat with approximately 26 acres of wetlands. 5. ANALYSIS: A. Level of Discretion in Decision Making The City has discretion in approving or denying rezoning applications, based on whether or not the proposal meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If the City finds that all the applicable standards are met, the rezoning application must be approved. However, if the City finds that any of the applicable standards are not met, the application may be denied. The City has relatively high level of discretion in approving a PUD. A PUD must be consistent with the City’s comprehensive plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety, and welfare of the community. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations in the City Code. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Rezoning/Planned Unit Development The use of the PUD zoning allows the developer zoning ordinance flexibility to create a master planned development. The PUD zoning is tied to a specific PUD general plan that is proposed with this application. The applicant is requesting an approval of a PUD for The Shore of Oneka Lake development. PUD’s offer enhanced flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of zoning district standards. The use of the PUD zoning also allows for a greater variety of uses, internal transfers of density, construction phasing and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility, the city has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of other, more standard zoning districts. In exchange for the proposed PUD, the applicant is proposing a higher quality development with valued amenities. The Shore of Oneka Lake PUD general plan offers sidewalk and trail Page 5 connections within the development and public open space along Oneka Lake, for easy access for all residents and the public. Providing public open space with an off road trail along the lake, it is a more sensitive development plan to the alternative of several lots on the lake with access to the lake with docks. The applicant has set up the development to allow for the building of quality homes, using quality materials and architectural guidelines. Many of the homes are also positioned for scenic overlooks over the stormwater ponds and wetlands. Staff believes that the layout of the proposed The Shores of Oneka Lake PUD general plan exceeds the City’s standards for residential developments. The applicant has offered a more creative and efficient approach to the existing landscape and constraints of the property through the site design layout. Because the ground water is high, the development needs fill to build up the site. The stormwater ponds offer dirt for fill, but also creates a scenic overlook for homes. These ponds also offer an ability to use stormwater for irrigation of the development, which is promoting the City’s “Reduce, Reuse, Replenish” initiative. This will be further discussed later in the report. In order to approve a PUD, the City must find that the applicant has demonstrated compliance with the following criteria: 1. Provide for the establishment of PUD zoning districts in appropriate setting and situations, to create and maintain a development pattern that complies with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 2. Allow for the mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land uses could not otherwise be accomplished. 3. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements that exceed the City’s standards to offset the effect of any variations. 4. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability and general welfare of the City. 5. Preserve and enhance natural features and open spaces including but not limited to the width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas, development of buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint facilities and utilities. 6. Maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities. 7. Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan shows the land use being Low Density Residential (LD). The rezoning/PUD is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in terms of land use and density. It is in Page 6 staff’s opinion that The Shores of Oneka Lake PUD general plan has offered a creative and efficient method to planning the site, all which meets the intent of the PUD ordinance. Lot Sizes/Setbacks The applicant is proposing to subdivide the existing 131.66 -acre site to create a total of 218 residential lots. The mix of lots include 110 single family home lots, 68 villa home lots, 40 twin home lots,. The applicant is proposing a combination of product types and lot sizes listed below: Standards Required Proposed Single Family Lots Proposed Villa Lots Proposed Twinhome Lots Minimum Lot Size 10,400 square feet (SF)/ 15,000 square feet (Twinhome) Smallest Lot Proposed: 5,417 square feet Largest Lot Proposed: 19,201 square feet Average Lot Proposed: 11,503 square feet Minimum Lot Width 80 feet (SF)/ 100 feet (Twinhome) 65 feet 52 feet 86.7 feet Front Yard Setback 30 feet 25 feet* 25 feet* 25 feet* Side Yard Setback 10 feet 7.5 feet 6 feet 7.5 feet Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Maximum Building Coverage 30% 45% 45% 45% (both lots combined) Maximum Lot Coverage 50% 60% 60% 60% (both lots combined) * Requested PUD flexibility highlighted in grey **Front yard setbacks will vary along long, straight roads as much as possible to create visual interest along these stretches. Density The maximum development density for a PUD in the R-3 zoning district is 4 units per 1 acre. The applicant is proposing a residential net density of 2.27 units per 1 acre, which fits the requirements of a PUD. Although the applicant is requesting flexibility on lot sizes and setbacks, the density meets the ordinance standards. Page 7 Shoreland The shoreland district comes in effect for all homes located within 1000 feet of the ordinary high- water (OHW) level of Oneka Lake. The applicant is asking for flexibility on lots effected by the shoreland district requirements, in order to provide a more sensitive development than otherwise allowed by ordinance. All of the lots are pulled back from the lake with public open space along the lake, is a more sensitive development approach than the alternative of several lots on the lake with access to the lake with docks. Oneka Lake Required Proposed Setback from OHW 150 feet Over 150 feet Minimum Lot Size 20,000 sq. ft. 5,417 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width 125 feet 52 feet Maximum Structure Height 25 feet 35 feet Maximum Impervious Surface Area 25% Less than 25% overall * Requested PUD flexibility highlighted in grey The applicant is proposing mostly two story walk-out homes, which will make it difficult to comply with the maximum structure height for the shoreland district of 25 feet. In all residential zoning districts the maximum structure height is 35 feet. Development Phasing The applicant is proposing to construct the development in four phases. The phasing plan the applicant provided shows the phasing generally starting from the from the west and providing access to Goodview Trail North. The first phase would be in 2022 and include the platting of 51 lots with a combination of single family homes, villa homes, and townhomes with access off Highway 61 and Goodview Trail North. The roundabout is part of phase 1, but with grant and permitting requirement from MnDOT, the roundabout will be constructed in 2023. There is a condition of approval that prior to the issuance of a building permit in phase 2, the roundabout shall be constructed and functioning. As development continues on the site in later phases of the development, connections will be made to Goodview Avenue and the properties to the north. The property is also proposed to be graded in two phases. The first phase would be generally the western portion of the site. The remaining would be graded with Phase 2 or earlier. Landscaping/ Signage The applicant has provided a full landscape plan. According to Section 90-181 Landscaping, each home site shall have two deciduous shade trees maintained in the front yard. The applicant is proposing to have two trees in the front yard of all lots, with the exception of the some lots having one tree in the rear yard. The landscape plan shows boulevard trees along the streets and Page 8 landscape buffers for corner lots. The plan also shows nicely landscaped entrances along Street AA and Street A. The trees and landscaping proposed to be installed with the development is 524, which exceeds the ordinance standards. Based on the review, staff recommends the following revisions to the landscape plan. • Provide a landscape buffer from commercially zone property to the west. • Provide a landscape plan for the roundabout, including irrigation. • Provide additional landscaping at key locations and focal points in the development. • Provide details for any monument signage and landscaping. The applicant is proposing to preserve some significant stands of trees that are currently on the property. The applicant intentionally planned the development layout and location of the outlot in order to preserve these trees. It’s in staffs opinion that the applicant can easily revise the landscape plan to meet the recommendations, and is comfortable with having conditions listed in the resolution to revise the plan. Lighting The applicant has provided a lighting plan. The applicant is proposing typical street lighting within the development, that meets the ordinance standard. The applicant has indicated that they will be installing a decorative lamp style light throughout the development. Streets/Access Access will occur from 159th Street and Highway 61 to the west as well as from the existing street stubs of Goodview Avenue and Goodview Trail from the Oneka Ponds development to the south. The applicant has been working with MnDOT on the intersection improvement to 159th Street and Highway 61 and it is proposed to be a roundabout. MnDOT has reviewed the preliminary layout and is encouraged to see an intersection improvement in this location. A MnDOT permit for the construction of the roundabout is required prior to construction. The developer is responsible for the construction cost of the roundabout with the development. The construction of the roundabout is part of the first phase of the development and will be required to be completed and functioning prior to a issuance of a building permit for the second phase of the development. The developer cost responsibilities will be identified and included in the development agreement for the first phase of the project. There is a ditch crossing that is required for the extension of Street A. While the full design of the crossing has not been submitted, staff will continue to work with the applicant on the design. A permit from Rice Creek Watershed will be required prior to construction. The applicant shall provide a utility stub and access point from Street AA/159th Street to serve several lots that are east of Highway 61, west of the development, in the future. Right-of-way shall be dedicated with the first phase of development. Page 9 Staff is be working with the developer and MnDOT to develop a construction access from Highway 61 at 159th Street or more north, to minimize traffic and roadway impact to Goodview Avenue and Goodview trail. Staff is comfortable with the new road design as proposed in the plan. Park Dedication The developer is required to dedicate land, pay a fee, or a combination of land and fee to satisfy park dedication per Sec. 90-324 of the City Code. The applicant is required to dedicate 10% of the developable acres for park land with a density of 0-3.99 units per acre units per acre. The developer has indicated that there are 96 acres of buildable land in the development. Therefore, the developer is required to dedicate 9.6 acres of park land. The current park dedication fee is $3,400 per unit. With 218 units the park dedication fee would be $741,200. Park Dedication Calculations Required *Land OR Fee Proposed Land 10% of the developable acres 9.6 acres 3.89 acres and Fee $3,400 per unit $741,200 $441,014 The developer is proposing to dedicate a combination of land and fee to satisfy the park dedication requirements. The land proposed to be dedicated is the upland areas of Outlot G along Oneka Lake. The proposed land dedication of 3.89 acres satisfies 40.5% of the requirement. The remaining would be satisfied with payment of 59.5% of the fee ($3,400 per unit) which totals $441,014 with 218 units. The developer is also asking for credit for the cost of park amenities and construction of the trail. The developer has indicated that the trail and boardwalk adjacent to the lake is estimated to cost $148,500. It is not within the Park Dedication Policy to give credit for costs incurred by the developer for construction of trails or parks. This development is in Neighborhood Park Service Area 10 which is served by Oneka Lake Park, the future park currently occupied by the Bernin family and the public boat launch on Oneka Lake. Oneka Lake Park and the Bernin property are immediately south of the neighborhood. The proposed park dedication would expand the city park properties and provide opportunities for a more expansive open space and trail network. The Parks Commission anticipates additional planning of the park properties as this property develops. At its April 20, 2022 meeting the Parks Commission considered the request. They agreed that giving credit for construction costs was not in the Park Dedication Policy and since they did not know what specific amenities would be installed they could not give the credit. They stated they would like to see what amenities would be installed within the access points to the trail along the Page 10 lake and other areas and continue to talk with the developer as the project continues on whether they would provide credit. The Parks Commission made a recommendation to allow the park dedication to be satisfied with a combination of land and fee for the development. Sidewalks and Trails Sidewalks are required to be built in developments with lots less than 80’ wide (Sec. 90-336). The developer is showing a combination of trails and sidewalks that would meet this requirement. The Existing and Proposed Trails Map shows a proposed trail north of Goodview Avenue North, a trail around Oneka Lake, and a trail connection east to west to Highway 61. The applicant is showing a trail and sidewalk combination along Street A which would connect to the existing sidewalk on Goodview Avenue North. This links the neighborhood to the south and Oneka Lake Park. The applicant is also showing a trail adjacent to Oneka Lake connected with boardwalks. A trail is shown to on the south end of the Highway 61 roundabout, connecting with the Hardwood Creek Regional Trail and the existing trail along 159th Street. A trail or sidewalk shall be constructed on Street H to provide a connection to the proposed Oneka Lake trail. The developer is working through the processes to get approval to construct the proposed trail on the berm along Oneka Lake. As part of the approval conditions it states that an additional on or off street trail be built if construction of a trail on the berm not be possible. Drainage/Grading The City will review and issue a stormwater management permit for the development. The plans include managing stormwater through a combination of ponds and a stormwater reuse system. The design is consistent with stormwater rules as proposed, and staff will work with the applicant to finalize the plans and issue a stormwater permit as the project moves forward. There is floodplain located on the property and the boundary is proposed to be revised. The applicant has provided detailed documentation showing the existing and proposed floodplain. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to finalize the details. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) will need to be prepared and submitted for FEMA approval so that the existing floodplain boundaries and elevations can be formally revised. Water Re-use The plans include the installation of a stormwater reuse system to be utilized to irrigate individual lots. The system is feasible from a water availability and equipment standpoint and staff will finalize the technical details as the project moves forward. The system will be installed by the applicant and owned/operated/maintained by the homeowner’s association. The system will be part of the overall stormwater management improvements to be included as part of the Page 11 stormwater permit. A stormwater reuse agreement between the City and the applicant shall be recorded. The agreement will include provisions that will allow the City to operate the system in the event that it is necessary to maintain compliance with the stormwater permit. The provisions will include an ability to assess any City costs associated with operation and maintenance of the system. Staff is working with the applicant to determine whether or not the water reuse system will generate stormwater management credits beyond those required to meet their own permitting requirements. If that is the case, the City will include in its use agreement with the developer that excess credits generated are the property of the City. Wetlands The property includes some wetlands, which have been delineated and approved by the City as LGU. The applicant is proposing to impact 1 acres of the 26 acres of wetland for street construction and grading. The applicant has submitted a wetland replacement plan to the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) for approval of the wetland impacts. The wetland replacement plan will need to be approved prior to final plat approval of any phase. There is a trail along Oneka Lake on the plan. There are areas where a boardwalk will be installed for the crossing of the wetlands. The boardwalks will be designed to qualify for a no loss (no wetland impact) determination from the TEP. Staff will continue to work with the applicant on the design of the boardwalk. The boardwalk will maintain the 8-foot width of the trails they will connect to throughout the development. Homeowners Association A homeowners association (HOA) is proposed for the development. There are three housing styles, single family detached homes, villa homes, and twinhomes. All of the homes would be part of a Master HOA will be established for the development to own/operate/maintain community areas, landscaping, and the water re-use system. The HOA will also provide for restrictions on outdoor storage, parking (no boats, campers, or trailers) in order to keep the community looking orderly and well maintained. Preliminary Plat The preliminary plat consists of 218 residential lots and 10 outlots. The proposed use and ownership of each outlot are as follows: Outlot Acres Ownership Use A 1.54 Current Owner (Fenway Land Company) Wetlands/Future Development B 11.37 City of Hugo Stormwater management, wetlands, and right-of-way C 5.04 Current Owner (Fenway Future Development Page 12 Land Company) D 8.30 City of Hugo Stormwater management/ Wetlands E 4.41 City of Hugo Stormwater management F 0.54 City of Hugo Powerline easement/Future Trail Corridor G 31.3 City of Hugo Public open space, wetlands, trail corridor H 1.68 City of Hugo Stormwater management I 1.70 City of Hugo Stormwater management J 6.44 City of Hugo Stormwater management Drainage and Utility Easements There are a number of Outlots included as part of the plat. Outlots that contain stormwater ponds and/or park are proposed to be deeded to the City; the remainder of the Outlots should include drainage and utility easements. The plans shall be revised to include adequate access to maintain outlot J. The plans shall be reviewed and approved by staff. Utilities The construction plans identify a 12” trunk watermain being extended through the development to the northern property line. The sanitary sewer will be connecting into the sewer line at the southwest corner of the development and will be serving the proposed development, as well as possible sewer connections several lots on the eastern side of Highway 61 in the future. No additional areas to the north will be served from this connection as the City’s Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan identifies them as being served from the north. 6. CONCLUSION: Staff believes that the layout of the proposed The Shores of Oneka Lake PUD general plan exceeds the City’s standards for residential developments. The applicant has offered a more creative and efficient approach to the existing constraints of the property through the site design layout. It is in staff’s opinion that the applicant meets all the requirements necessary to approve the PUD and preliminary plat. 7. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommended approval of the PUD and preliminary plat for M/I Homes for the development to be known as “The Shores of Oneka Lake”, subject to the conditions listed in the resolutions. Page 13 8. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission agreed that the request met the requirements necessary to approve the preliminary plat and PUD. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the preliminary plat and PUD, subject to the conditions in the resolutions. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location map 2. Ordinance approving the rezoning to PUD 3. Resolution approving the PUD General Plan 4. Resolution approving the Preliminary Plat 5. Engineer’s memo dated May 4, 2022 6. MnDOT letter dated May 5, 2022 7. Applicant’s narrative dated March 14, 2022 8. Preliminary Plat and PUD plans 9. Letter from a resident on the development Forest Boulevard NorthGoodview Avenue North152nd Street North Goodview Trail North Goodview Trail Court North152nd Street North 152nd Street North Shores of Oneka Lake PUD and Preliminary Plat Location Map Hugo, MN Site Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary ¯0 500Feet1 in = 500 feet Document Path: S:\Mapping\Emily\LocationSite Maps\2022\Shores of Oneka Lake Notice.mxdSite ORDINANCE 2022-___ AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO AMENDING CHAPTER 90 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LAND LOCATED EAST OF HIGHWAY 61 AND NORTH OF GGOODVIEW AVENUE NORTH THE CITY OF HUGO ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. Chapter 90 of the City Code of the City of Hugo, Minnesota, is hereby amended by changing the classification on the City of Hugo Zoning Map to PUD (Planned Unit Development) with respect to the approximately 132-acre property legally described as follows: See Attached Section 2. Effective Date. This amendment shall take effect upon its passage. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6th day of June, 2022. ______________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: ________________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2022- APPROVING PUD GENERAL PLAN FOR M/I HOMES MINNEAPOLIS/ ST. PAUL, LLC, FOR “THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKE” ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF HIGHWAY 61 AND NORTH GOODVIEW AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, M/I Homes Minneapolis/St. Paul. LLC, has requested approval of a PUD general plan to allow approximately 218 residential lots and 10 outlots on the 131.66 acre property legally described as follows: (See Attached) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the PUD general plan at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by M/I Homes Minneapolis/St. Paul. LLC, subject to the following conditions: 1. A PUD general plan is approved to allow the creation of 218 residential lots and 10 outlots. The development shall be constructed in accordance with the application and plans received by the City on October 22, 2022, April 5, 2022, April 19, 2022, April 28, 2022, and May 4, 2022 except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of the requested rezoning of the 131.66 acre property and preliminary plat. 3. The PUD general plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 4. The developer shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer’s letter dated May 4, 2022 5. PUD flexibility is granted to allow: a. Flexibility to allow various lot sized with a minimum lot size of 5,417 square feet, where 10,400 square feet is required. b. Flexibility to allow various lot width with a minimum lot width of 52 feet, were 80 feet is required by ordinance. c. Flexibility to allow a minimum front setback of 25 feet, where 30 feet is required. d. Flexibility to allow various setbacks with a minimum side yard setback of 6 feet, where 10 feet is required. e. Flexibility to allow a maximum impervious coverage of a lot to be 60% , where 50% is required. f. Flexibility from the shoreland overlay district regulations as below: Resolution 2022-___ Page 2 Oneka Lake Required Proposed Setback from OHW 150 feet Over 150 feet Minimum Lot Size 20,000 sq. ft. 5,417 sq. ft. Minimum Lot Width 125 feet 52 feet Maximum Structure Height 25 feet 35 feet Maximum Impervious Surface Area 25% Less than 25% overall 6. The preliminary phasing plan is generally approved per plans dated October 21, 2022, revised May 4, 2022. Any major revisions to the phasing plan shall require PUD amendment. Minor modifications shall be reviewed and approved by staff. a. Phase 1 shall include: i. Permit shall be issued by MnDOT for construction of the roundabout at 159th Street and Highway 61. ii. Start of construction of the roundabout at 159th Street and Highway 61. iii. The developer is responsible for the cost and construction of the roundabout at 159th Street and Highway 61. The Letter of Credit for Phase 1 shall include the costs for construction of the roundabout. b. Phase 2 shall include: i. The roundabout at 159th Street and Highway 61 shall be constructed and functioning, with the first layer of bituminous, prior to issuance of a building permit for the 1st building. ii. Park improvements: 1. An 8’ bituminous trail, boardwalk, and landscaping shall be installed within all of Outlot G that is in phase 2. Final location of the trail and boardwalk shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to installation. This shall be constructed by and paid for by the developer. 2. The trail locations and trail connections to the parks to the south and the connections to the development shall be reviewed and approved by staff. 3. Connections to the parks and development shall be installed. c. Phase 3 shall include: i. Park improvements: 1. The remaining 8’ bituminous trail, boardwalk, and landscaping shall be installed within all of Outlot G. Final location of the trail and boardwalk shall be reviewed and Resolution 2022-___ Page 3 approved by staff prior to installation. This shall be constructed by and paid for by the developer. 7. Any development of Outlot C or A shall require PUD amendment and PUD General Plan submittal for review and approval by the City Council. 8. The building setbacks and impervious surface coverage requirements for the PUD are as follows: Standards Proposed Single Family Lots Proposed Villa Lots Proposed Twinhome Lots Minimum Lot Size Smallest Lot Proposed: 5,417 square feet Largest Lot Proposed: 19,201 square feet Average Lot Proposed: 11,503 square feet Minimum Lot Width 65 feet 52 feet 86.7 feet Front Yard Setback 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Side Yard Setback 7.5 feet 6 feet 7.5 feet Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Maximum Building Coverage 45% 45% 45% (both lots combined) Maximum Lot Coverage 60% 60% 60% (both lots combined) 9. A stormwater re-use system, as shown in the plans, shall be constructed with the development. The final plans shall be reviewed and approved by staff. The system will be installed by the applicant, and owned/operated/maintained by the homeowner’s association. A stormwater reuse agreement shall be reviewed an approved by staff and recoded at Washington County. 10. The developer has indicated that an HOA will be established for the development to own/operate/maintain community areas, landscaping, and the water re-use system. The HOA documents shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to the recording of the final plat for the Phase 1. 11. The twinhome elevations shall be reviewed and approved by staff. Resolution 2022-___ Page 4 12. The developer must comply with the following, prior to Final Plat and Final PUD Plan application: Landscaping and Lighting a. The landscape plan shall be revised to include: 1. A landscape buffer, with evergreen trees, from commercially zoned property to the west. 2. A landscape plan for the roundabout, including irrigation. 3. Additional landscaping at key locations and focal points in the development. 4. Details for any monument signage and landscaping. b. The final landscape plans must be submitted for review and approval by staff. c. The developer shall enter into an easement agreement for access and maintenance of the landscaping with in Outlots B, E, F, G, and I. Streets/Access d. A permit from Rice Creek Watershed District shall be issued for the ditch crossing for construction of Street A. e. An access and utility connection shall be made on the west side of Outlot B. f. Adequate access shall be provided for maintenance to Outlot J. The access width and location shall be reviewed and approved by staff. Parks and Trails a. An additional off street trail shall be built if construction of a trail on the berm along Oneka Lake not be feasible. b. A trail or sidewalk shall be constructed on Street H to provide a connection to the proposed Oneka Lake trail. c. The developer shall provide details and specifications for the trail and boardwalk along Oneka Lake. d. The developer shall work with staff on Outlot G amenities and connections to the parks to the south. Resolution 2022-___ Page 5 Miscellaneous e. The wetland replacement plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) and the City. f. An encroachment agreement shall be approved by Xcel Energy for improvement within the power line easement. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6th day of June, 2022 _____________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2022-___ APPROVING PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR M/I HOMES MINNEAPOLIS/ ST. PAUL, LLC, FOR “THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKE” ON PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF HIGHWAY 61 AND NORTH GOODVIEW AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, M/I Homes Minneapolis/St. Paul. LLC, has requested approval of a preliminary plat to allow approximately 218 residential lots and 10 outlots on the 131.66 acre property legally described as follows: (See Attached) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the preliminary plat at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by M/I Homes Minneapolis/St. Paul. LLC, for a preliminary plat, subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary plat is approved to allow the creation of approximately 218 residential lots and 10 outlots. The development shall be constructed in accordance with the application and plans received by the City on October 22, 2022, April 5, 2022, April 19, 2022, April 28, 2022, and May 4, 2022 except as amended by this resolution. 2. Approval is contingent upon City Council approval of a rezoning to PUD for the approximately 132 acre property. 3. The preliminary phasing plan is generally approved per plans dated October 21, 2022, revised May 4, 2022. Any major revisions to the phasing plan shall require PUD amendment. Minor modifications shall be reviewed and approved by staff. a. Phase 1 shall include: i. Permit shall be issued by MnDOT for construction of the roundabout at 159th Street and Highway 61. ii. Start of construction of the roundabout at 159th Street and Highway 61. iii. The developer is responsible for the cost and construction of the roundabout at 159th Street and Highway 61. The Letter of Credit for Phase 1 shall include the costs for construction of the roundabout. b. Phase 2 shall include: i. The roundabout at 159th Street and Highway 61 shall be constructed and functioning, with the first layer of bituminous, prior to issuance of a building permit for the 1st building. ii. Park improvements: Resolution 2022-___ Page 2 1. An 8’ bituminous trail, boardwalk, and landscaping shall be installed within all of Outlot G that is in phase 2. Final location of the trail and boardwalk shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to installation. This shall be constructed by and paid for by the developer. 2. The trail locations and trail connections to the parks to the south and the connections to the development shall be reviewed and approved by staff. 3. Connections to the parks and development shall be installed. c. Phase 3 shall include: i. Park improvements: 1. The remaining 8’ bituminous trail, boardwalk, and landscaping shall be installed within all of Outlot G. Final location of the trail and boardwalk shall be reviewed and approved by staff prior to installation. This shall be constructed by and paid for by the developer. 4. Any development of Outlot C or A shall require PUD amendment and PUD General Plan submittal for review and approval by the City Council. 5. The building setbacks for the PUD are as follows: Standards Proposed Single Family Lots Proposed Villa Lots Proposed Twinhome Lots Minimum Lot Size Smallest Lot Proposed: 5,417 square feet Largest Lot Proposed: 19,201 square feet Average Lot Proposed: 11,503 square feet Minimum Lot Width 65 feet 52 feet 86.7 feet Front Yard Setback 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Side Yard Setback 7.5 feet 6 feet 7.5 feet Rear Yard Setback 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Maximum Building Coverage 45% 45% 45% (both lots combined) Maximum Lot Coverage 60% 60% 60% (both lots combined) Resolution 2022-___ Page 3 6. Outlot Use and Ownership: Outlot Acres Ownership Use A 1.54 Current Owner (Fenway Land Company) Wetlands/Future Development B 11.37 City of Hugo Stormwater management, wetlands, and right-of-way C 5.04 Current Owner (Fenway Land Company) Future Development D 8.30 City of Hugo Stormwater management/ Wetlands E 4.41 City of Hugo Stormwater management F 0.54 City of Hugo Powerline easement/Future Trail Corridor G 31.3 City of Hugo Public open space, wetlands, trail corridor H 1.68 City of Hugo Stormwater management I 1.70 City of Hugo Stormwater management J 6.44 City of Hugo Stormwater management 7. The developer shall comply with the City standards for street lighting within the public right-of-way. 8. Prior to the release of the final plat for recording, the developer must comply with the following conditions. a. The developer must comply with all conditions outlined in the City Engineer’s memos dated May 4, 2022. b. The developer must comply with Resolution 2022-____, for the PUD. c. The development shall comply with the Fire Chief’s requirements regarding fire flow calculations, the location of fire hydrants, fire department connections, and fire lane signage. d. A permit from Rice Creek Watershed District shall be issued for the ditch crossing for construction of Street A. e. The developer must obtain all necessary stormwater management and WCA permits from the City. f. The developer shall obtain all necessary local, state, and federal permits. g. The developer shall provide the Homeowners Association documents for review and approval by staff. Resolution 2022-___ Page 4 h. The City’s development fees will apply to this project. The fee amounts will be calculated and included as part of the Development Agreement. A development agreement shall be executed and all fees shall be paid. i. A stormwater reuse agreement shall be reviewed and approved by staff and recoded at Washington County. j. The developer shall obtain approval from Xcel Energy on the crossing of the powerline easement. k. Details and specification for the trails and boardwalks shall be reviewed and approved by staff. l. The developer shall work with the City on providing a landscape buffer from the pond from the commercial properties to the west. The buffer shall be reviewed and approved by City staff. m. Park Dedication shall be satisfied by dedication of 3.89 acres of upland on Outlot G and a combination of fee. A park dedication fee shall be paid for each lot platted in the amount of $2,023 per lot. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the developer must comply with the following conditions. a. The applicant shall record the final plat, development agreement and all other documentation at Washington County and provide the City with proof of recording. b. A Letter of Map Revision will need to be prepared and submitted for FEMA approval so that the existing floodplain boundaries and elevations can be revised per the plans. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6th day of June, 2022. ______________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: _______________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk S:\Users\R_Juba\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\The Shores of Oneka Lake\Engineers Memo Shores of Oneka Lake Pre Plat-PUD - 20220504.docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM May 4, 2022 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Shores of Oneka Lake Preliminary Plat Review WSB Project No. 019275-000 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the Preliminary Plat submittal for the Shores of Oneka Lake. We have reviewed the following information related to this application: • The Updated Shores of Oneka Lake Preliminary Plat/PUD Submittal dated April 27, 2022 by Carlson McCain • Phasing Plan dated February 25, 2022 by Carlson McCain Based on the review of the documents, we offer the following Engineering comments related to this application: General/Access 1. The subject property is located east of Highway 61 at 159th Street and north of the existing Oneka Ponds development. 2. Access will occur from the proposed roundabout project at 159th Street and Highway 61 to the west as well as from the existing street stubs of Goodview Avenue and Goodview Trail from the Oneka Ponds development to the south. 3. The Collector streets through the development (Street ‘A’ and Street ‘AA’) should be 32’ face- to-face to match the existing roads (Goodview Avenue, etc.). 4. Applicant will need to install speed advisory signs on curves that do not meet 30 MPH minimum requirements 5. Detailed redline comments have been provided on the plans and sent to the applicants engineer so they can be addressed in future submittals. Utility Plan 6. As identified in the City’s Comprehensive Water Supply and Distribution Plan, a 12” trunk watermain is proposed to be extended north from the Oneka Ponds development, through the proposed site and both, connected to the 12” crossing at the 159th St roundabout and stubbed to a future through street at the northern end of the site. 7. The construction plans identify this 12” trunk watermain being extended through the development to the northern property line, with the City of Hugo paying for oversizing costs. 8. The sanitary sewer will be connecting into the 10” trunk line at the southwest corner of the development and will be serving the proposed development including apartments to the northwest as well as several lots on the eastern side of Highway 61/Forest Blvd. No additional areas to the north will be served from this connection as the City’s Comprehensive Sanitary Sewer Plan identifies them as being served from the north. 9. The development to the south, Oneka Ponds, currently connects to the same 10” trunk line in an adjacent lot. The City is requiring, to avoid redundant connections and maintenance, that Ms. Rachel Juba May 4, 2022 Page 2 S:\Users\R_Juba\DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS\The Shores of Oneka Lake\Engineers Memo Shores of Oneka Lake Pre Plat-PUD - 20220504.docx the proposed development reroute this drainage through their connection to the 10” trunk line and abandon the existing connection and pipe. 10. The applicant will need to provide an entrance and utility stubs extending south from Street AA/ 159th Street for an access road on the west side of the development to serve several lots on the east side of Highway 61/Forest Boulevard in the future. 11. Applicant will need to coordinate with and get agreements for all encroachments and work within the large Xcel Energy easement through the site Stormwater Management/Wetlands 12. The site is proposing water quality requirements primarily through water reuse for onsite irrigation. The remaining water quality required will be provided by the stormwater ponds onsite. 13. The site is meeting rate control requirements through the stormwater ponds onsite. 14. Additional permitting with both RCWD and DNR Floodplain/FEMA will be required for the culvert crossing in the ditch. a. While it is not a public ditch, the private ditch is considered a Regional Conveyance System under RCWD’s definitions and will requires a Rule G permit administered by RCWD. b. Proposed fill within the floodplain requires additional permitting with the DNR Floodplain/FEMA. 15. While the information previously reviewed confirms the viability of the stormwater reuse system, additional detail on the irrigation system is needed for review. Details on where the pump will be placed, where the intake pipe will be laid and at what elevation, in addition to the location of the main line for irrigation should all be provided as the project moves forward. 16. Additional detailed redline drainage comments have been provided to the applicant and will need to be addressed prior to the issuance of the stormwater permit. 17. The boundary for the wetland, that is part of Outlot E adjacent to lots 6 and 7, does not appear to be represented correctly based on the approved wetland boundary. 18. Applicant to clarify whether proposing a boardwalk to cross the wetland in outlot E in the northeast portion of the project area. 19. Applicant to clarify how is they are proposing to construct the north-south trail corridor 20. The applicant will need to address potential draining of wetland adjacent to the deep stormwater ponds. 21. The applicant will need to confirm that these wetlands are not US army corps jurisdictional. 22. Based on the proposed plans, the applicant will need to seek approval for sequencing, sequencing flexibility (if they can't meet sequencing), and wetland replacement. 23. Applicant will need to provide vehicle access routes to each outlot for future maintenance. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463. Sincerely, WSB Nick Guilliams, PE Senior Project Manager cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) 1 Rachel Juba From:Kratz, David (DOT) <David.Kratz@state.mn.us> Sent:Thursday, May 5, 2022 4:16 PM To:Rachel Juba Cc:Josephson, Adam (DOT); Tomasevich, Dmitry (DOT); Muhic, P Cameron (DOT); Schutt, Jake (DOT); Sherman, Tod (DOT); Festvog, Kaare (DOT) Subject:RE: The Shores Of Oneka Lake - Preliminary Plat Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.   Hi Rachel,    I reviewed and circulated the plans last week, and MnDOT has no separate comments on the PUD itself. The developer  should continue to coordinate with Hugo, Washington County and MnDOT on the roundabout and related  improvements to the US 61 and 159th St intersection.    For MnDOT reference, this was review #P22‐030.    Best,    David    David Kratz  Senior Planner  651‐234‐7792  david.kratz@state.mn.us  MnDOT Metro District   1500 W County Rd B‐2  Roseville, MN 55113      From: Sherman, Tod (DOT) <tod.sherman@state.mn.us>   Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 3:21 PM  To: Rachel Juba <RJuba@ci.hugo.mn.us>  Cc: Josephson, Adam (DOT) <adam.josephson@state.mn.us>; Tomasevich, Dmitry (DOT)  <dmitry.tomasevich@state.mn.us>; Kratz, David (DOT) <David.Kratz@state.mn.us>; Muhic, P Cameron (DOT)  <cameron.muhic@state.mn.us>; Schutt, Jake (DOT) <Jake.Schutt@state.mn.us>  Subject: RE: The Shores Of Oneka Lake ‐ Preliminary Plat    Sorry Rachel:    We did indeed receive the plans and we are scheduled to have the review completed and will send you a copy on May  6th.    Thanks, Tod    2 From: Rachel Juba <RJuba@ci.hugo.mn.us>   Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 2:24 PM  To: MN_DOT_MetroDevReviews <metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us>  Cc: Sherman, Tod (DOT) <tod.sherman@state.mn.us>; Josephson, Adam (DOT) <adam.josephson@state.mn.us>;  Tomasevich, Dmitry (DOT) <dmitry.tomasevich@state.mn.us>  Subject: RE: The Shores Of Oneka Lake ‐ Preliminary Plat      Hello:    I wanted to make sure that you received this email. I did not get a confirmation from you.     Thank you.   Rachel     From: Rachel Juba   Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2022 4:42 PM  To: 'metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us' <metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us>  Cc: 'tod.sherman@state.mn.us' <tod.sherman@state.mn.us>; 'Josephson, Adam (DOT)'  <adam.josephson@state.mn.us>; Tomasevich, Dmitry (DOT) <dmitry.tomasevich@state.mn.us>  Subject: The Shores Of Oneka Lake ‐ Preliminary Plat    Hello:    Attached are the plans for The Shores of Oneka Lake preliminary plat. There has already be a fair amount of  coordination with MnDOT with this project since they are planning a round‐a‐bout at 159th Street.     Please provide your comments on the plan prior to May 6th. It will be on the Planning Commission meeting May 12th.     Let me know if you have any questions.     Thank you.    RACHEL JUBA   COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR   CITY OF HUGO ‐ MINNESOTA  14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N., Hugo, MN 55038  o: 651.762.6304 | www.ci.hugo.mn.us       This message may be from an external email source.  Do not select links or open attachments unless verified. Report all suspicious emails to Minnesota IT Services Security Operations Center.  SHORES OF ONEKA LAKE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND PRELIMINARY PLAT Shores of Oneka Lake Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Submittal Page 1 March 14, 2022 Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat Application Shores of Oneka Lake Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat INTRODUCTION M/I Homes has entered into a purchase agreement to purchase property located between State Trunk Highway No. 61 and Oneka Lake. The 131.66-acre site is proposed to include a total of 218 lots including 109 single family lots, 40 twinhome lots, and 69 villa lots. There will also be a proposed 100-unit apartment complex in the northwest corner of the site that is not being considered at this time that will be developed by a different developer. The housing types are clustered giving the sense of smaller communities within the overall larger neighborhood. Villa Homes are single family homes with association maintenance of yard areas and snow removal. These homes meet the increasing demand for one-level living with association maintenance. Twinhomes will also be association maintained. The association maintenance of lawn areas and snow removal provides the homeowner with the freedom to travel, own a winter or summer home, or more time for recreation. The mix of housing types and varied lot sizes provides for diversity and interest in the community. Homebuyers will have the ability to select from a wide range of floor plans, exterior materials, architectural features, and landscape designs. Careful attention is paid to ensuring the use of varied elevations and materials to avoid any monotony of architecture from the street. Exterior materials include vinyl siding and may also include stone or brick accents. Attached are elevations for the wide range of floor plans. The site is currently zoned R-3 – Single Family Residential and FUS – Future Urban Service. In order to provide a mix of housing types, M/I is requesting approval of a Planned Unit Development in order to allow for varied lot sizes to create diversity and interest in the community. ABOUT M/I HOMES M/I Homes has been in business for over 40 years and has built over 130,000 homes in 15 markets within the United States. They entered the Twin Cities Market in 2015 by purchasing Hans Hagen Homes. Hans Hagen Homes was founded over 50 years ago and was one of the largest and oldest home builders in the Minneapolis market. Shores of Oneka Lake Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Submittal Page 2 MATERIALS SUBMITTED 1. City Application 2. Deed 3. Preliminary Construction Plans a. Cover b. Existing Conditions c. Preliminary Plat Index d. Preliminary Plat e. Preliminary Site & Utility Plan Index f. Preliminary Site & Utility Plan g. Preliminary Grading Index h. Preliminary Grading & Erosion Control Plan i. Details j. Lighting Plan k. Phasing Plan l. Landscape Plans 4. Traffic Study (Draft) 5. Building Acre Calculations 6. Product Type Key 7. Shoreland Exhibit 8. Floodplain Exhibit 9. Stormwater Management Plan CONTACT INFORMATION Applicant: M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC 5354 Parkdale Drive, Unit 100 St. Louis Park, MN 55416 763-586-7217 Engineer: Carlson McCain 3890 Pheasant Ridge Drive Northeast Suite 100 Blaine, MN 55449 SITE DATA PID# 17-031-21-14-0002, 16-031-21-22-0001, and 17-031-21-14-0001 Shores of Oneka Lake Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Submittal Page 3 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS The proposed PUD standards are as follows: Standards Required Proposed Single Family Lots Proposed Villa Lots Proposed Twinhome Lots Minimum Lot Size 10,400 square feet (SF)/15,000 square feet (Twinhome) Smallest Lot Proposed: 5,040 square feet Largest Lot Proposed: 19,201 square feet Average Lot Proposed: 11,503 square feet Minimum Lot Width 80 feet (SF)/100 feet (Twinhome) 65 feet 52 feet 86.7 feet Front Yard Setback 25 feet* 25 feet* 25 feet* 25 feet* Side Yard (Street) Setback 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet 25 feet Side Yard (Interior) Setback 10 feet 7.5 feet 6 feet 15 feet (between buildings) Rear Yard Setback 20 feet 30 feet 30 feet 30 feet Maximum Building Coverage 30% maximum 45% 45% 45% (both lots combined) Maximum Lot Coverage 50% maximum 60% 60% 60% (both lots combined) *We will vary front yard setbacks along long, straight roads as much as possible to create visual interest along these stretches. It should be noted that M/I requires a reciprocal easement provided between two properties with side yard setbacks of less than 7.5 feet in order to allow access for both property owners should they have improvements that would require access to the adjacent property. The villa lots would have these reciprocal easements. Please see below examples of other communities that M/I Homes of Minneapolis/St. Paul, LLC have been approved for four- to six-foot side yard setbacks. Shores of Oneka Lake Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Submittal Page 4 North Creek (Farmington) Woodland Cove (Minnetrista) Shores of Oneka Lake Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Submittal Page 5 Carmichael Ridge (Hudson) Inwood Estates (Lake Elmo) Shores of Oneka Lake Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Submittal Page 6 PRELIMINARY PLAT STREETS AND UTILITIES From Forest Boulevard North, the site will be accessed through a street that will align with 159th Street North. From the existing development to the south, Goodview Trail North and Goodview Avenue North will continue north. The site will utilize stormwater and irrigation reuse; no water will infiltrate into the lake. We have worked with City staff to revise our stormwater management plan to a layout conceptually acceptable to staff and will work on additional revisions that may be required. We understand that there is an irrigation ban for drinking water and therefore have incorporated as much reuse as possible. A 12-inch watermain will be extended under Highway 61 to the west. All streets will be public streets. WETLANDS The site has 25.89 acres of wetlands and will include just under one acre of wetland fill for which we will be purchasing wetland credits. We have had a pre-application meeting with the Technical Evaluation Panel, and they were generally satisfied with the proposed wetland replacement areas. FLOODPLAIN There is a floodplain resulting from a ditch extending approximately north-south along the west side of the development. This floodplain extends into some lots within the development, and we will be working with the City to request a CLOMR/LOMR to remove these areas from the floodplain. PARCELS TO BE INCLUDED There is a 50-foot-wide strip of land previously owned by Xcel Energy that has been deeded over and included in the plat with a powerline easement to provide sufficient width for the powerlines on the property. Additionally, there is a 16-foot-wide strip of land to the southeast that will be included in the plat if title can be established. We ask that the inclusion of this parcel with this plat not be a condition of approval, as we do not have ownership of the property and therefore have no control over it. We will assist in whatever way we can to clean up the title work but ask that the City take the lead in working through this process as we have no interest in the property. PARKLAND The development proposes a trail running north-south on the east side of the development adjacent to the lake. The proposed design creates a buffer between the lake and houses, allowing the usable open space of approximately 3.89 acres of upland adjacent to the property to be enjoyed by the public rather than solely residents on the shoreline. Because this outlot will be owned by the City, the trail and upland portion of this area provide ample opportunity for recreation for residents. There will also be amenities such as city-owned docks and benches provided. The trail will end at the city-owned property which is adjacent to Oneka Lake Park that is planned to soon become part of the park. The trail will also connect to the development with boardwalks. Shores of Oneka Lake Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Submittal Page 7 LANDSCAPING/TREE PRESERVATION The landscape plan provides a total of 524 trees with 461 deciduous trees, 52 coniferous trees, and 11 ornamental trees. 432 trees are required for the site. Those yards that are wide enough have two trees in the front yard, and those yards that are not wide enough have a tree in the front yard and one in the back. White pines are proposed in lieu of deciduous trees where it’d be beneficial for screening and blocking headlights, mainly on some of the end and corner lots. The yards nearest to the properties to the west will be buffered by both the ditch and existing vegetation. There are also trees provided near the entrance near Street AA adjacent to the pond on the northwest corner of the site. The tree preservation plan shows two separate woodland areas as well as a plantation area. Of these areas, 20% of the area within Woodland Area 1 will be preserved; 0% of the area in Woodland Area 2 will be preserved; and 12% of the area within the Plantation Area will be preserved. ROUNDABOUT The project will include construction of a roundabout on Trunk Highway 61, the design of which has not yet been formally approved by Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). MnDOT has been generally supportive of the proposed design, and the level one layout will be reviewed at the March 16, 2022 Metro District Layout Approval Committee Meeting. COLLECTOR STREET Goodview Avenue is designated as a collector street on the City of Hugo’s Comprehensive Plan. We have worked with City staff to come up with a design of this street so that a minimal number of lots have entrances on this street. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET In 2006, an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was completed for the subject property. The proposed development at that time included 975 single family and multi-family residential units on 369 acres. The newly proposed development, with 218 units on 131.66 acres, is much less impactful. The EAW determined the following using the criteria for determining the potential for significant environmental impacts: • Wildlife Habitat: The previous design provided a buffer from the lake which was implemented to address the impacts on wildlife. The newly proposed design also provides a buffer. In addition, we will prepare and implement a Blanding’s Turtle Avoidance Plan; have had a tree survey prepared; and have minimized impacts to woodlands and wetlands through design and layout. • Water Consumption, Wastewater Generation, Stormwater: The reduced number of units will have less impact on these. • Wetlands and Floodplain Impacts: The previously proposed project impacted 3.76 acres of wetlands. The newly proposed project impacts approximately one acre of wetlands. The proposed project will also impact less area of floodplain. • Traffic: With less units, less traffic will be generated. • Cumulative Potential Effects of Related or Anticipated Future Projects: Outlots A and C will be owned by others and are likely to develop in the near future. There is no certainty of if or Shores of Oneka Lake Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Submittal Page 8 when the other parcels to the north will develop, though the proposed project will certainly facilitate this development. • Extent to Which Environmental Affects are Subject to Mitigation by Ongoing Public Regulatory Authority: We will be obtaining the necessary permits to help mitigate impacts. • Extent to Which Environmental Effects Can be Anticipated and Controlled as a Result of Other Environmental Studies Undertaken by Public Agencies or the Project Proposer, Including other EIS’s: The environmental effects of the project will still be anticipated and controlled as a result of the environmental review, planning and permitting processes. DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE Construction of the initial phase of the development will start in Summer/Fall of 2022. We anticipate a total of three development phases. A phasing plan has been provided with the submittal. Construction of the roundabout will commence with Phase I, however, due to the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) approval process, and because we are in the process of applying for a MnDOT Local Partnership Program (LPP) grant, it is anticipated that the roundabout will not be completed until summer of 2023. With the approval of Phase I, we will provide a Letter of Credit that will include the cost of construction of the roundabout. We are asking that we be able to start on Phase II in June, which will likely be prior to completion of the roundabout, with the condition that certificates of occupancy not be released until the completion of the roundabout. Following this process would not result in additional traffic to the development until the roundabout is complete. PRICING INFORMATION AND SIZE The single family lots will range in size from 1,752 square feet to 3,577 square feet, and sales prices will start at $480,000. The villas will range in size from 1,734 square feet to 1,935 square feet, and sales prices will start from $420,000. The twinhome will be approximately 2,000 square feet and their sales starting price is $390,000. RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS Shores at Oneka Lake will have an HOA that will provide for the maintenance of the overall common elements in the community, including landscaping and irrigation of the common areas, snow removal from sidewalks and private streets, and exterior maintenance. The villa and twinhome homeowners will pay additional fees under the HOA that provide for a higher level of maintenance, including lawncare in the summer and snow removal in the winter. The HOA will also provide for restrictions on outdoor storage, parking (no boats, campers, or trailers) in order to keep the community looking orderly and well maintained. OUTLOTS All outlots except outlots A and C, which will be owned and maintained by others, will be dedicated to and maintained by the City. An access easement will be dedicated behind Lots 20 and 19 and to the north of lots 21, Block 16 to provide access to Outlot J. Shores of Oneka Lake Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Submittal Page 9 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT The City of Hugo allows Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) to offer enhance flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The proposed development will provide a mix of housing types, internal transfers of density, and construction phasing. The allowed flexibility will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with existing zoning standards. We believe that the development meets the City’s PUD criteria in the following ways: (1) The establishment of PUD zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations, to create or maintain a development pattern that complies with the city's comprehensive plan. Comment: The proposed development complies with the Comprehensive Plan in that the properties are guided for Low Density Residential, which allows a density of two to three units per acre, which can be increased up to four units per acre with a PUD. With 131.66 total acres less 25.89 acres of wetlands and 7.12 acres of floodplain, the property has a total buildable acreage of 98.65 acres. With 218 units, the net density is 2.21 lots per acre. Additionally, the Comprehensive Plan calls for a greater variety of life cycle housing, which is provided in this development. (2) The mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land uses could not otherwise be accomplished under this chapter. Comment: The standards within the R-3 zoning district (particularly the setbacks and maximum impervious surface) would not allow for villa or twinhome lots, as these are meant to have smaller lots with less maintenance. (3) Variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in this chapter in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements (e.g., construction materials, landscaping, lighting, open space, etc.) that exceed the city's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Comment: The site plan clusters the housing types giving the sense of smaller communities within the overall larger neighborhood. The development will offer a variety of housing options with quality construction materials with careful attention paid to ensuring the use of varied elevations and materials to avoid any monotony of architecture from the street. Additionally, the development proposes amenities available to residents along the lakeshore including docks, benches, and trails along the lakeshore. (4) A more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the city. Comment: The development is sensitive to the wetlands on the site and will result in the construction of a roundabout connecting Trunk Highway 61 and 159th Street to Street AA of the Preliminary Plat. This roundabout will promote safer traffic circulation at this intersection. Additionally, the proposed design is moved back from the lake, providing open space dedicated to the City along the lakeshore that will provide opportunity for passive recreation by residents. (5) Preservation and enhancement of natural features and open spaces, including but not limited Shores of Oneka Lake Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Submittal Page 10 to the width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas, development of buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint facilities and utilities. Comment: As previously mentioned, the development preserves a majority of the wetlands on the site, requiring less than an acre of wetland fill. Additionally, the site preserves the natural buffer on the south and west side of the development and open space along the lake. (6) Maintenance or improvement for the efficiency of public streets and utilities. Comment: As stated, the development will result in the construction of a roundabout on Forest Boulevard North. Additionally, a 12-inch watermain connection will be provided from the development underneath Highway 61 to connect to the west with a casement pipe underneath Highway 61. There is also a proposed minor collector road that would connect to future development to the north. (7) Establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. Comment: The property is surrounded by single family homes to the south, and the development will provide a buffer between these single-family homes and twinhomes within the development. Industrial uses are to the west, which will be buffered with existing vegetation. The property to the north is vacant agricultural land, and there is a buffer between the development and the lake. Shores of Oneka Lake Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Submittal Page 11 STRUCTURE ELEVATIONS SINGLE FAMILY HOMES Shores of Oneka Lake Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Submittal Page 12 VILLA HOMES Shores of Oneka Lake Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plat Submittal Page 13 TWINHOMES THE SHORES OF LAKE ONEKAHugo, MN | 05/04/22 PondPond PondPond PondPond PondPond PondPond PondPond WetlandWetland WetlandWetland LakeLakeExisting DitchExisting DitchWetlandWetland WetlandWetland WetlandWetland 109 Single Family 69 Villa Lots 40 Twinhome Units Total Number of Lots 218 Total Apartment Units 100 Total Units 318 Total Site Area (AC.) 131.66 Gross Density (Units / AC.) 2.42 FUTURE APARTMENTSFUTURE APARTMENTS(BY OTHERS)(BY OTHERS) SITE DATA N 0 300150 off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_cover.dwgSave Date:05/04/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.The Shores of Oneka LakeHugo, MinnesotaKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR VICINITY MAP SITEO N E K A P O N D S COVER1BENCHMARKSKROO N E K A L A K E 3R2326('$3$R70(176 %< 27+(R6 PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 338569PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 400503PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 319846PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 340482PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 274865PARCEL PER ONEKA LAKE PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 338569Detail ASeeDetail ADOC. NO. 220825SeeDetail BLEGENDDetail BBENCHMARKSoff:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\8869-excon.dwgSave Date:03/08/22DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:EXISTING CONDITIONSRevisions:1. 2/25/22 - Revise Layout per City CommentsThomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this survey, planor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:10/21/2140361212KCM10/21/21883THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, MN 55416 67854PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 338569PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 400503PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 319846PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 340482PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 274865PARCEL PER ONEKA LAKE PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 338569Detail ASeeDetail ADOC. NO. 220825See Detail BSTREET AASTREET ISTREET DSTREET CSTREET C STREET AS T R E E T F STREET GSTRE E T G STREET HSTREET E STREET FSTREET A STRE E T G LEGENDDetail B SITE DATA off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\8869-prp index.dwgSave Date:04/27/22DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:PRELIMINARY PLAT INDEXThomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this survey, planor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:10/21/2140361213KCM10/21/21883THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKE SETBACK DATA TWIN HOMES52' SINGLE FAMILY65' SINGLE FAMILYTHE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, MN 55416Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments2. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 340482PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 274865PARCEL PERDOC. NO. 220825OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:STREET DS T R E E T C ST R E E T CLEGEND THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, Minnesotaoff:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\8869-prp.dwgSave Date:04/27/22DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:PRELIMINARY PLATThomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this survey, planor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:10/21/2140361214KCM10/21/21883M/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, MN 55416Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments2. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments ONEKA LAKEOWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:STREET ISTREET A LEGENDoff:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\8869-prp.dwgSave Date:04/27/22DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments2. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City CommentsThomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this survey, planor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:10/21/2140361215KCM10/21/21883PRELIMINARY PLATBENCHMARKSTHE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, MN 55416 PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 338569PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 400503PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 319846PARCEL PER DOC. NO. 340482OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:ST R E E T C STREET AASTREET ASTREET AS T R E E T F ST R E E T A A off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\8869-prp.dwgSave Date:04/27/22DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this survey, planor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:10/21/2140361216KCM10/21/21883PRELIMINARY PLATLEGENDTHE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, MN 55416Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments2. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments ONEKA LA K ESTREET ISTREET F STREET GSTRE E T I STREET FSTREE T G LEGENDoff:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\8869-prp.dwgSave Date:04/27/22DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this survey, planor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:10/21/2140361217KCM10/21/21883PRELIMINARY PLATBENCHMARKSTHE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, MN 55416Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments2. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments ONE K A L A K EOWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:OWNER:STREE T G S TR E E T H STREET E STREET FLEGENDoff:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\survey\preliminary\8869-prp.dwgSave Date:04/27/22DRAWN BY:ISSUE DATE:FILE NO:Thomas R. Balluff, L.S.I hereby certify that this survey, planor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Land Surveyor underthe laws of the State of MinnesotaPrint Name:Signature:Date:License #:10/21/2140361218KCM10/21/21883PRELIMINARY PLATBENCHMARKSTHE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, MN 55416Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments2. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments O N E K A P O N D SO N E K A P O N D SPROPOSEDAPARTMENTS(BY OTHERS )off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_site.dwgSave Date:05/04/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRPRELIMINARY SITE &UTILITY PLAN INDEX9BENCHMARKSSITE PLAN LEGENDO N E K A P O N D SKRO O N E K A L A K E O N E K A P O N D SO N E K A P O N D SPROPOSEDAPARTMENTS(BY OTHERS )off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_site.dwgSave Date:05/04/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.PRELIMINARY SITE &UTILITY PLAN10BENCHMARKSKRO PROPOSEDAPARTMENTS(BY OTHERS )off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_site.dwgSave Date:05/04/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.PRELIMINARY SITE &UTILITY PLAN11BENCHMARKSKRO O N E K A P O N D SO N E K A P O N D SPROPOSEDAPARTMENTS(BY OTHERS )off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_grade index.dwgSave Date:05/04/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRBENCHMARKS WETLAND FILL SUMMARY 12LOCPRELIMINARY GRADING &EROSION CONTROL PLAN INDEX O N E K A P O N D SO N E K A P O N D SPRELIMINARY GRADING& EROSION CONTROL PLAN13off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_grade.dwgSave Date:05/04/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.BENCHMARKSLOC O N E K A P O N D SPRELIMINARY GRADING& EROSION CONTROL PLAN14off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_grade.dwgSave Date:05/04/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.BENCHMARKSLOC PRELIMINARY GRADING& EROSION CONTROL PLAN15off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_grade.dwgSave Date:05/04/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.BENCHMARKSLOC PRELIMINARY GRADING& EROSION CONTROL PLAN16off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_grade.dwgSave Date:05/04/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.BENCHMARKSLOC PRELIMINARY GRADING& EROSION CONTROL PLAN17off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_grade.dwgSave Date:05/04/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.BENCHMARKSLOCPROPOSEDAPARTMENTS(BY OTHERS ) PRELIMINARY GRADING& EROSION CONTROL PLAN18off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_grade.dwgSave Date:05/04/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.BENCHMARKSLOC PRELIMINARY GRADING& EROSION CONTROL PLAN19off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_grade.dwgSave Date:05/04/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.BENCHMARKSLOC off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_detail.dwgSave Date:04/21/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.DETAILS20LOC off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_detail.dwgSave Date:04/21/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.DETAILS21FRAMECURBFRAMEKRO PROPOSEDAPARTMENTS(BY OTHERS )The Shores of Lake OnekaLighting Planoff:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_light-plan.dwgSave Date:05/04/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.LIGHTING PLANLP1LP1BENCHMARKSKROO N E K A P O N D S O N E K A L A K E PHASING PLAN(GRADING)PHASE I PHASE I I P H A S E I I I ( B Y O T H E R S )off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_phasing plan.dwgSave Date:05/04/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.The Shores of Oneka LakeHugo, MinnesotaKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR VICINITY MAP SITEO N E K A P O N D S P1BENCHMARKSKROO N E K A L A K E PHASE I 2 off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\engineering\preliminary\8869_phasing plan.dwgSave Date:05/04/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Professional Engineer underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/2110/21/21Brian J. Krystofiak, P.E.25063BJK#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416212. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.3. 5/4/22 per City Comments.The Shores of Oneka LakeHugo, MinnesotaKnow what'sbelow.before you dig.CallR VICINITY MAP SITEO N E K A P O N D S P2BENCHMARKSKROO N E K A L A K E3+$6(,,PHASING PLAN3+$6(,,3+$6( ,3+$6(,3+$6(,3+$6(,,3+$ 6 (  , , ,3+$6( ,9 %< 2 7+(R6 2 O N E K A P O N D SO N E K A P O N D SFUTURE DEVELOPMENToff:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\landscape\8869_landscape - old.dwgSave Date:04/27/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/21RJR10/21/21Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA56346RJR42. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRL1PRELIMINARYLANDSCAPE PLAN FUTURE DEVELOPMENTTREESCODERMFMRBHBHLKCWOROBLAECOMMON NAMENorthwood Red MapleSienna Glen MapleRiver Birch Multi-TrunkCommon HackberryNorthern Acclaim Thornless Honey LocustKentucky CoffeetreeSwamp White OakRed OakBoulevard LindenAmerican ElmCOMMON NAMEWhite PineCOMMON NAMEAutumn Brilliance ServiceberryGolden Shadows Pagoda DogwoodPrairifire CrabappleCOMMON NAMEMnDOT Seed Mix 25-151MnDOT Seed Mix 33-261MnDOT Seed Mix 32-241MnDOT Seed Mix 35-241CONIFEROUS TREES CODEWPORNAMENTAL TREES CODESBPDCAGROUND COVERS CODETITIITIIITIVL2off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\landscape\8869_landscape - old.dwgSave Date:04/27/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/21RJR10/21/21Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA56346RJR42. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.PRELIMINARYLANDSCAPE PLAN O N E K A P O N D SO N E K A P O N D SFUTURE DEVELOPMENTTREESCODERMFMRBHBHLKCWOROBLAECONIFEROUS TREES CODEWPORNAMENTAL TREES CODESBPDCAGROUND COVERS CODETITIITIIITIVCOMMON NAMENorthwood Red MapleSienna Glen MapleRiver Birch Multi-TrunkCommon HackberryNorthern Acclaim Thornless Honey LocustKentucky CoffeetreeSwamp White OakRed OakBoulevard LindenAmerican ElmCOMMON NAMEWhite PineCOMMON NAMEAutumn Brilliance ServiceberryGolden Shadows Pagoda DogwoodPrairifire CrabappleCOMMON NAMEMnDOT Seed Mix 25-151MnDOT Seed Mix 33-261MnDOT Seed Mix 32-241MnDOT Seed Mix 35-241off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\landscape\8869_landscape - old.dwgSave Date:04/27/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/21RJR10/21/21Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA56346RJR42. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.L3PRELIMINARYLANDSCAPE PLAN TREESCODE QTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZE CONTAINERRM 70Acer rubrum `Northwood`Northwood Red Maple2.5" Cal. B&BFM 42Acer x freemanii `Sienna`Sienna Glen Maple2.5" Cal. B&BRB 21Betula nigraClump Form, 2.5" Cal EquivalentRiver Birch Multi-Trunk8` Ht.B&BHB 49Celtis occidentalisCommon Hackberry2.5" Cal. B&BHL 53Gleditsia triacanthos inermis `Harve`Northern Acclaim Thornless Honey Locust2.5" Cal. B&BKC57Gymnocladus dioica `Espresso`Kentucky Coffeetree2.5" Cal. B&BWO50Quercus bicolorSwamp White Oak2.5" Cal.B&BRO5Quercus rubraRed Oak2.5" Cal.B&BBL 73Tilia americana `Boulevard`Boulevard Linden2.5" Cal.B&BAE 41Ulmus americana `Princeton`American Elm2.5" Cal.B&BCONIFEROUS TREES CODE QTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZE CONTAINERWP 52Pinus strobusWhite Pine6` Ht.B&BORNAMENTAL TREES CODE QTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZE CONTAINERSB6Amelanchier x grandiflora `Autumn Brilliance`Clump Form, Red Fall Color, 1.5" CalEquivalentAutumn Brilliance Serviceberry7` Ht.B&BPD 3Cornus alternifolia `Wstackman`Pale Yellow Flowers, Maroon Fall ColorGolden Shadows Pagoda Dogwood 1.5" Cal.B&BCA2Malus x `Prairifire`Red FlowersPrairifire Crabapple1.5" Cal.B&BGROUND COVERS CODE QTYBOTANICAL NAMECOMMON NAMESIZE CONTAINERTI244,659 sfType I - Turf Seed MixRefer to notes for acceptable seedingmethodsSeeding Rate 180 lb/acMnDOT Seed Mix 25-151seedTII282,149 sfType II - Stormwater Seed MixRefer to notes for acceptable seedingmethods. Seeding Rate 52.0 lb/acMnDOT Seed Mix 33-261seedTIII1,851,518 sfType III - Native Construction Seed MixRefer to notes for acceptable seedingmethods. Seeding Rate 57.0 lb/acMnDOT Seed Mix 32-241seedTIV482,160 sfType IV - Buffer Seed MixRefer to notes for acceptable seedingmethods. Seeding Rate 55.0 lb/acMnDOT Seed Mix 35-241seedPLANT SCHEDULEEXISTING GRADEGUY WIRE WITH WEBBINGFLAGGING- ONE PER WIREPLANTING SOIL MIXTURE (SEE SPEC.)MINIMUM 1/2 WIDTH OF ROOT BALL4"-6" SHREDDED BARKMULCHUNDISTURBED OR STABILIZEDSUBSOILNOTE: GUY ASSEMBLY OPTIONAL BUTCONTRACTOR ASSUMES FULLRESPONSIBILITY FOR MAINTAINING TREEIN A PLUMB POSITION FOR THEDURATION OF THE GUARANTEE PERIODGUY ASSEMBLY- 16"POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE(40 MIL) 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP (TYP)DOUBLE STRAND 10 GA. WIRE, 2-7"ROLLED STEEL POSTS (MnDOT 3401)@ 180° O.C. (SEE STAKING DIAGRAM)COORDINATESTAKING TO INSUREUNIFORMORIENTATION OF GUYLINES AND STAKES2. TRIM OUT DEAD WOOD AND WEAK AND/ORDEFORMED TWIGS. DO NOT CUT A LEADER. DONOT PAINT CUTS.4. PLACE PLANT IN PLANTING HOLE WITHBURLAP AND WIRE BASKET, (IF USED), INTACT.BACKFILL WITHIN APPROXIMATELY 12" OF THETOP OF ROOTBALL, WATER PLANT. REMOVETOP 1/3OF THE BASKET OR THE TOP TWOHORIZONTAL RINGS, WHICHEVER IS GREATER.REMOVE ALL BURLAP AND NAILS FROM TOP1/3 OF THE BALL. REMOVE ALL TWINE.3. SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOILOR THOROUGHLY COMPACTED BACKFILL SOIL.INSTALL PLANT SO THE ROOT FLARE IS AT ORUP TO 2" ABOVE THE FINISHED GRADE.6. WATER TO SETTLE PLANTS AND FILLVOIDS.5. PLUMB AND BACKFILL WITHBACKFILL SOIL.7. WATER WITHIN TWO HOURS OFINSTALLATION. WATERING MUST BESUFFICIENT TO THOROUGHLY SATURATEROOT BALL AND PLANTING HOLE.8. PLACE MULCH WITHIN 48 HOURS OFTHE SECOND WATERING UNLESS SOILMOISTURE IS EXCESSIVE.1. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLEPRIOR TO PLANTINGPLANTREE WRAPBACKFILL MIXPAINTED FLUORESCENT ORANGEWHITE FLAGGING (TYP.)DOUBLE STRAND 12 GAUGE WIRE8" 2-PLY NYLON STRAPS8' STEEL TEE POST-4 INCHES HARDWOOD MULCHFROM TOP 1/3 OF THE BALLREMOVE BURLAP & ROPEUNDISTURBED SUBSOIL4 INCH DEEP SAUCERNOTE: SEE PLANTING NOTES FOR THE TYPE OF MULCH MATERIAL TO USE.12"6"2'(MIN.)6" 6"3 REQUIRED AT 120off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\landscape\8869_landscape - old.dwgSave Date:04/27/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/21RJR10/21/21Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA56346RJR42. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.L4PRELIMINARYLANDSCAPE PLAN off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\landscape\8869_tree survey.dwgSave Date:03/11/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/21RJR10/21/21Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA56346RJR52. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.Know what'sbelow.before you dig.CallRT1TREE INVENTORY··· T2off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\landscape\8869_tree survey.dwgSave Date:03/11/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/21RJR10/21/21Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA56346RJR52. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.TREE INVENTORY off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\landscape\8869_tree survey.dwgSave Date:03/11/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/21RJR10/21/21Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA56346RJR52. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.T3TREE INVENTORY off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\landscape\8869_tree survey.dwgSave Date:03/11/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/21RJR10/21/21Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA56346RJR52. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.T4TREE INVENTORY off:\jobs\8861 - 8880\8869 - dell webb - hugo\cad c3d\landscape\8869_tree survey.dwgSave Date:03/11/22Revisions:1. 2/25/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.#8869THE SHORES OF ONEKA LAKEHugo, MinnesotaM/I HOMES OF MINNEAPOLIS, LLC5354 Parkdale Drive, #100St. Louis Park, Minnesota 55416Print Name:Signature:Date:License #:Drawn:Designed:Date:I hereby certify that this plan, specificationor report was prepared by me or under mydirect supervision and that I am a dulyLicensed Landscape Architect underthe laws of the State of Minnesota10/21/21RJR10/21/21Ryan J. Ruttger, RLA56346RJR52. 4/27/22 Revise Layout per City Comments.T5TREE INVENTORY To the Planning Commission, Thank you for volunteering and serving on the Planning Commission. As newer residents of the City, we really appreciate the time and energy you’ve invested to make Hugo what it is today. We are writing today about the proposed Shores of Oneka Lake- M/I Homes development plans in front of you this evening. When we bought our property, we always knew this land would end up being developed and even though we’ll miss the woods and quiet, we are excited about the opportunities this project is going to bring! First, we appreciate the 50 foot buffer of trees being preserved north of our homes (adjacent to Outlot K), this will help the transition between neighborhoods seem more intentional while preserving a quality greenway corridor. We also are excited about having more sidewalk and trail connections to use versus the one way in, one way back route we have now- especially the trail shown along Oneka Lake that will connect back into the existing park. We also appreciate that while Goodview Ave N will serve as a main road, it is not the thoroughfare access road for the entire new neighborhood- the area where it is disconnected will really help distribute trips and keep traffic down. We appreciate the preservation of the natural environment including the wetland, creeks, and tree masses where feasible. And lastly, we appreciate that there will now be another way to get out of our neighborhood- especially to a more convenient roundabout intersection. Overall, while change is hard, we think once this development is complete it will be a huge asset to the community and us. Our only concern on this project is the number of large construction vehicles that will be adding traffic and roadway impacts to our neighborhood. The route from Highway 61 to the end of Goodview Avenue is over 1.3 miles and 50 houses directly front both 147th/ Oneka Lake Boulevard North and Goodview Avenue North on the way to the site. The route north on Highway 61 is only 1 mile and has minimal impacts to other properties- this road is also designed to accommodate heavy vehicles. We request Planning Commission add a condition of approval to the project that states: All construction vehicles over 2 tons must utilize Highway 61 and the new access to the site until the first lift of pavement is complete or 50% of the homes constructed. I understand there will be construction vehicles that need to utilize the existing Goodview access, and residential/contractor vehicles seem reasonable. But given the condition of our roads (a ton of potholes on Goodview currently and pavement issue in front of O’Reilly), the number of residents impacted, the speed concerns already existing on 147th/ Oneka Lake Blvd, and number of cars using this as their only access in and out of the neighborhood; the large vehicles would be better directed to access the site from their northern access on Highway 61. If we cannot add this condition, we would request the developer to submit a financial payment to the City of Hugo that pays for a portion of our future roadway rehab or pays for the roads to receive a mill and overlay upon project completion. It is not right, or meeting the goals of the City, to put the burden of development back on existing residents to clean up the area. Thank you again for serving the community and considering the perspective of residents. We look forward to the completion of this project and hope you understand our interim construction concerns. Sincerely, Gina & Simon McCormack 15470 Goodview Ave N SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS. INSURER(S) AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER F : INSURER E : INSURER D : INSURER C : INSURER B : INSURER A : NAIC # NAME: CONTACT (A/C, No): FAX E-MAIL ADDRESS: PRODUCER (A/C, No, Ext): PHONE INSURED REVISION NUMBER:CERTIFICATE NUMBER:COVERAGES IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must have ADDITIONAL INSURED provisions or be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED, subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(s). THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. OTHER: (Per accident) (Ea accident) $ $ N / A SUBR WVD ADDL INSD THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. $ $ $ $PROPERTY DAMAGE BODILY INJURY (Per accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT AUTOS ONLY AUTOSAUTOS ONLY NON-OWNED SCHEDULEDOWNED ANY AUTO AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Y / N WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? (Mandatory in NH) DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS below If yes, describe under ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE $ $ $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE E.L. EACH ACCIDENT ER OTH- STATUTE PER LIMITS(MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EXP (MM/DD/YYYY) POLICY EFF POLICY NUMBERTYPE OF INSURANCELTR INSR DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES (ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, may be attached if more space is required) EXCESS LIAB UMBRELLA LIAB $EACH OCCURRENCE $AGGREGATE $ OCCUR CLAIMS-MADE DED RETENTION $ $PRODUCTS - COMP/OP AGG $GENERAL AGGREGATE $PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $MED EXP (Any one person) $EACH OCCURRENCE DAMAGE TO RENTED $PREMISES (Ea occurrence) COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS-MADE OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER: POLICY PRO- JECT LOC CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) CANCELLATION AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 (2016/03) © 1988-2015 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. CERTIFICATE HOLDER The ACORD name and logo are registered marks of ACORD HIRED AUTOS ONLY Hugo MN 55308 PO Box 321 Hugo Lions Club Certificate Holder is named as an Additional Insured per form M-5350a(05/2009). Show Name: Hugo Location: Hanifl Fields Athletic Park, Hugo MN 55308 Show Date: 06/11/2022 Included 2,000,000 1,000,000 5,000 100,000 2,000,000 05/15/202305/15/202272LPS042865Y 8 BI / PD Deductible $500 8 8 8 A 20079National Fire & Marine Ins Co (Brokerage) 55373MNRockford 4016 Aspen Circle South PC Pyrotechnics, LLC. dan@innovativeinsure.net (952) 445-2182(952) 445-5767 Daniel Williams 55379MNShakopee 8091 Old Carriage Court North Innovative Insurance Services, LLC. 6/1/2022 K:\019629-000\Admin\Permits\21.31 Oneka Elementary\replacement\MEMO_HugoCityCouncil_OnekaElementaryWetlandReplacement_042022.docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Tom Weidt, City of Hugo Mayor Becky Petryk, City of Hugo Council Member Phil Klein, City of Hugo Council Member David Strub, City of Hugo Council Member Mike Miron, City of Hugo Council Member CC: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director From: Tony Havranek, WSB Date: April 20, 2022 Re: City Project No. 21.31 Oneka Elementary School Wetland Replacement WSB Project No. 019629-00 I have drafted this memo regarding the White Bear Lake School District’s (ISD #624) application to impact and replace wetlands as part of an expansion project for the Oneka Elementary. Tim Wald, Assistant Superintendent for Finance & Operations for the White Bear Lake School District, submitted a MN joint application for activities affecting water resources in Minnesota requesting approval for wetland impact sequencing and replacement. The application was considered complete on March 4, 2022, and a subsequent notice of application was iss ued on March 18, 2022. The purpose of the project is to provide an additional five (5) classrooms and support space along with a storm shelter. A wetland boundary and type application was approved on February 24, 2022 and was issued on April 4, 2022, which identified two (2) wetland basins within the project area. Wetland 1 is a large (13.71 acres) wetland complex consisting of shallow open water, deep and shallow marsh, and wet meadow wetland types, while wetland 2 is a 2.72-acre shallow marsh and wet meadow wetland. Wetlands 1 and 2 provide the following wetland functions: •Surface water detention •Nutrient Transformation •Carbon Sequestration •Sediment and Particulate Retention •Other Wildlife Habitat Four (4) alternatives were considered for this project as part of the wetland conservation act (WCA) sequencing requirement. The first was the no-build alternative. This was rejected as it would not accomplish the purpose of providing the additional capacity needed for students. The second was to site the addition along the northeast corner of the existing building. This was rejected as existing classrooms would need to be demolished and there would not be enough space for a connecting hallway. The third was to site the building along the east side of the existing building. This was rejected as the shape of the building would be dramatically different, buried fiber cable would need to be excavated and a new location found, existing roadway setbacks cannot be met, the walking trail would need to be eliminated, and equitable classroom G.13 Hugo City Council April 20, 2022 Page 2 K:\019629-000\Admin\Permits\21.31 Oneka Elementary\replacement\MEMO_HugoCityCouncil_OnekaElementaryWetlandReplacement_0420 22.docx space would not be provided. The fourth and preferred alternative, is to site the addition along the southern portion of the existing building. This would provide the necessary classroom space and configuration, allow natural light into the classrooms, and allow the existing walking path to remain. This alternative would require impacts (filling) to wetland 2. To minimize impacts, sideslopes will be maintained at 3:1 to maintain safety of pedestrians utilizing the walkway. The total amount of impact to wetland 2 using the preferred alternative is 0.2435 acres. This amount of impact must be replaced and is proposed to be replaced using wetland bank credits. The required wetland replacement ratio is 2.5:1; however, the proposed wetland bank is within the same bank service area (BSA) 7, which allows a reduction of 0.5:1; resulting in a required replacement ration of 2:1. The proposed wetland bank is bank #1722 which is located within the same BSA and major watershed (Mississippi River-Metro). A total of 0.4870 acres of wetland credit are proposed to be withdrawn from this bank to meet the required 2:1 replacement ration. It is important to note, that while the proposed wetland replacement meets rule requirements, wetland functions identified for wetland 2 will be permanently lost within the City of Hugo. Special considerations required to be considered as part of the application process have been addressed and no impacts to these considerations have been identified by the applicant. Based on the application materials submitted by the applicant and subsequent review of those materials against MN Rule 8420, the wetland conservation act (WCA), the applicant has met all of the rule requirements for wetland impact sequencing and replacement. I recommend approval of this application for wetland impacts sequencing and replacement. Application materials and site plans are attached to this memo. Clearwater Cr Hardwood Cr Hardwood Cr Hardwood Cr Rice Cr Mississippi River - Twin Cities © OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA O n e k a E l e m e n t a r y A d d i t i o nHugo, M i n n e s o t a Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure areapproximate an d do not constitute an official s urvey produc t. .0 500 Feet Source: ESRI Streets BasemapAuthor: KBUDate Cre ated: 2/2/2022 2500 Shadywood Road, Suite 130Orono, MN 55331952-401-8757Kjolhaugenv.com Project: KES 2022-009 S it e L oc a t io n M ap wit hMajor & M in or Watersheds,Co un ty, a nd B SA Fig ure 1 Legend Site Boundary Major Watersheds Minor Watersheds 1 inch = 1,408 feetCoordinate Sys tem: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N Minor Watershed Pa rt of Rice Creek WD Major Watershed Site Location is in Washi ngton County & Bank Se rvi ce Are a 7 928 924 926 922 920 930 932934918936938 9169 1 49409129 2 2 9 2 4918926918928 9 1 6 920 926916924930928924922926920 9229 1 8 920 918 92092 6 930 926920918 922 920922 924 926 9 2 4 920922 9 3 6 924932928918938922 940 932 922922 9209309269189 2 0 9249229 2 0 920 918 930916 9189 2 4 9169209249189 2 2926932 9189269 2 29189229189189229329 2 4 92692093492291892 89269 2 2 922 9209 2 0 9189269229209229 3 2 934 918O n e k a E l e m e n t a r y A d d i t i o nHugo, M i n n e s o t a Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure areapproximate an d do not constitute an official s urvey produc t. .0 150 Feet Source: KES, MnTopo, MnGeoAuthor: KBUDate Saved: 3 /2/2022 2500 Shadywood Road, Suite 130Orono, MN 55331952-401-8757Kjolhaugenv.com Project: KES 2022-009 Ex i st in g Co n d tions Fi g ur e 2 Legend Site Boundary Culvert (S urface Inlets/Outlets) Wetland Boundary Storm Pond Washington County Lidar 1 inch = 263 feet Coordinate Sys tem: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N (2020, 7-County Imagery) Wetland 1 13.71 acres Wetlan d 2 2.7 2 a cre s O n e k a E l e m e n t a r y A d d i t i o nHugo, M i n n e s o t a Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure areapproximate an d do not constitute an official s urvey produc t. . 0 50 Feet Source: ESRI Streets BasemapAuthor: KBUDate Cre ated: 2/26/2022 2500 Shadywood Road, Suite 130Orono, MN 55331952-401-8757Kjolhaugenv.com Project: KES 2022-009 Av oi da n c e Al te rn at iv e s Fi gu re 5 Legend Underground Utilites Site Boundary Wetland Boundary Existing Storm Pond 1 inch = 64 feetCoordinate Sys tem: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N Media Center Location Locate addition to NE of building. Ad dition cannot be located here. Se e Section 4.2 of application. Locate addition to east of building. Ad dition cannot be located here. Se e Section 4.2 of application. Existing walking path O n e k a E l e m e n t a r y A d d i t i o nHugo, M i n n e s o t a Note: Boundaries indicated on this figure areapproximate an d do not constitute an official s urvey produc t. . 0 50 Feet Source: ESRI Streets BasemapAuthor: KBUDate Cre ated: 3/2/2022 2500 Shadywood Road, Suite 130Orono, MN 55331952-401-8757Kjolhaugenv.com Project: KES 2022-009 P r o po s ed P l an & We tl a nd I m pa c t Fi gu re 6 Le gend Site Boundary New Walking Path Underground Utili tes Wetland Fill 1 inch = 64 feetCoordinate Sys tem: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 15N Wetlan d 2 10,608 sf Fill Media Center Location New Stormond Location K:\019629-000\Admin\Permits\21.13 170th St N\Replacement\MEMO_HugoCityCouncil_170thstDrivewayWetlandReplacement_052422.docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Tom Weidt, City of Hugo Mayor Becky Petryk, City of Hugo Council Member Phil Klein, City of Hugo Council Member David Strub, City of Hugo Council Member Mike Miron, City of Hugo Council Member CC: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director From: Tony Havranek, WSB Date: May 24, 2022 Re: City Project No. 21.13 170th St. N. Driveway Install Wetland Replacement WSB Project No. 019629-00 I have drafted this memo regarding a MN Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota to impact and replace wetlands as part of a project to install a driveway directly off of 170th St. N. to provide access to a building site. Jim Reese and Cari Pratley submitted an application requesting approval for wetland impact sequencing and replacement. The application was considered complete on April 7, 2022, and a subsequent notice of application was issued on April 11, 2022. The comment period for the application expired on May 3, 2022; no comments were received. The purpose of the project is to provide access to a buildable portion of parcel #1003121120001 (see map). A wetland boundary and type application was approved on August 31, 2021 and was issued on September 27, 2022, which identified two (2) wetland basins within the project area. Wetland 1 is a large wetland complex consisting of wet meadow, shallow marsh, shrub swamp, and forested wetland while wetland 2 is small wetland consisting of wet meadow. Wetlands 1 and 2 provide the following wetland functions: •Surface water detention •Nutrient Transformation •Carbon Sequestration •Sediment and Particulate Retention •Waterfowl and Waterbird Habitat •Other Wildlife Habitat Four (4) alternatives were considered for this project as part of the wetland conservation act (WCA) sequencing requirement. The first was the no-build alternative. This was rejected as it would not accomplish the purpose of providing access to the buildable portion of the property. The second and third alternatives included shifting the driveway alignment and utilizing and existing stubbed access off of 170th St., but both options resulted in significantly more permanent wetland impact. G.14 Hugo City Council May 24, 2022 Page 2 K:\019629-000\Admin\Permits\21.13 170th St N\Replacement\MEMO_HugoCityCouncil_170thstDrivewayWetlandReplacement_052422.docx The fourth and preferred alternative, is to construct the driveway along the eastern property line to take advantage of an existing upland “island”. This is also the shortest route to the building site. The total amount of impact to wetland 1 using the preferred alternative is 0.35 acres. This amount of impact must be replaced and is proposed to be replaced using wetland bank credits. The required wetland replacement ratio is 2.5:1; however, the proposed wetland bank is within the same bank service area (BSA) 7, which allows a reduction of 0.5:1; resulting in a required replacement ration of 2:1. The proposed wetland bank is bank #1664 which is located within the same BSA and major watershed (Mississippi River-Metro). A total of 0.70 acres of wetland credit are proposed to be withdrawn from this bank to meet the required 2:1 replacement ration. It is important to note, that while the proposed wetland replacement meets rule requirements, wetland functions identified for wetland 1 will be permanently lost within the City of Hugo. Special considerations required to be considered as part of the application process have been addressed and no impacts to these considerations have been identified by the applicant. Based on the application materials submitted by the applicant and subsequent review of those materials against MN Rule 8420, the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), the applicant has met all of the rule requirements for wetland impact sequencing and replacement. I recommend approval of this application for wetland impacts sequencing and replacement. Application materials and site plans are attached to this memo. Attachments: Project Location Map Construction Plans/Survey Maps Approved Wetland Boundary Map !(!( !(!( !( !( Figure 2 - Existing Conditions 8/30/2021 170th Street North (KES 2021-060)Hugo, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 200 Feet Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons, Washington County, Met Council 2020 Spring Imagery T1-1UPT1-1W T1-2UP T1-2W T2-1W T2-1UP CountyDitchNo.2HardwoodCreek(M-059-009)Project Boundary Spoil Material !(Transect Public Watercourse/Ditch Private Ditch TEP Reviewed Wetland Boundary 8/30/21 Wetland 1 Type 2/3/8 28.9 acres Wetland 2 Type 2 0.31 acre 1,578 linear feet 375 linear feet 304 linear feet Spoil material in Wetand 1 ~0.62-ac 18 24 FIGURE 5 170th Street “Island” of upland area to be utilized in option 1 to minimize impact 25 Driveway proposals FIGURE 6A Proposal 1 26 FIGURE 6B Alternative 1 27 Floodplain Ariel View FIGURE 7 Source: https://www.dnr.state.mn.us/waters/watermgmt_section/floodplain/access-flood-maps.html 170th Street Alt. 1 transects flood plain Option 1 avoids flood plain 28 29 30 K:\019629-000\Admin\Permits\21.23 Shores of Oneka Lake\replacement app\MEMO_HugoCityCouncil_ShorwsofOneka_replacement_060222.docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Tom Weidt, City of Hugo Mayor Becky Petryk, City of Hugo Council Member Phil Klein, City of Hugo Council Member David Strub, City of Hugo Council Member Mike Miron, City of Hugo Council Member CC: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director From: Tony Havranek, WSB Date: June 2, 2022 Re: City Project No. 21.23 Shores of Oneka Lake Wetland Replacement and No-loss Determination WSB Project No. 019629-00 I have drafted this memo regarding a MN Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota to impact and replace wetlands as part of the Shores of Oneka Lake Development Project. John Rask (M/I Homes) submitted an application requesting approval for wetland impact sequencing and replacement. The application was considered complete on March 17, 2022, and a subsequent notice of application was issued on April 4, 2022. The comment period for the application expired on April 26, 2022; no comments were received. The purpose of the project is to create a mixed housing type, residential community consisting of 218 residential units, a large borrow pond (identified as Lake 1000), and a trail which incorporates a boardwalk system (see map). A wetland boundary and type application was approved on September 25, 2020 and was issued on January 18, 2021 for the western half of the project area and separate Notice of decision was issued in 2017 approving the wetland boundary and types for the wetlands on the eastern half of the project area. Collectively, these two approvals identified eight (8) wetland basins within the project area. Vegetative communities represented by these wetlands include seasonally flooded basins, wet meadows, and scrub-shrub wetlands. They provide the following wetland functions: •Surface water detention •Nutrient Transformation •Carbon Sequestration •Sediment and Particulate Retention •Waterfowl and Waterbird Habitat •Other Wildlife Habitat Multiple alternatives were considered for this project to avoid and minimize impacts to wetlands. The total amount of impact to on site wetlands using the preferred alternative is 0.9519 acres. This amount of impact must be replaced and is proposed to be replaced using wetland bank credits. The required wetland replacement ratio is 2.5:1; however, the proposed wetland bank is G.15 Hugo City Council June 2, 2022 Page 2 K:\019629-000\Admin\Permits\21.23 Shores of Oneka Lake\replacement app\MEMO_HugoCityCouncil_ShorwsofOneka_replacement_060222.docx within the same bank service area (BSA) 7, which allows a reduction of 0.5:1; resulting in a required replacement ration of 2:1. The proposed wetland bank is bank #1762 which is located within the same BSA and major watershed (Mississippi River-Metro). A total of 1.9038 acres of wetland credit are proposed to be withdrawn from this bank to meet the required 2:1 replacement ration. Special considerations required to be considered as part of the application process have been addressed and no impacts to these considerations have been identified by the applicant. Based on the application materials submitted by the applicant and subsequent review of those materials against MN Rule 8420, the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA), the applicant has met all of the rule requirements for wetland impact sequencing and replacement. I recommend approval of this application for wetland impacts sequencing and replacement. Application materials and site plans are attached to this memo. Attachments: Project Location Map Construction Plans/Survey Maps Approved Wetland Boundary Map Hardwood Cr Clearwater Cr Hardwood Cr Mississippi River - Twin Cities © OpenStreetMap (and) contributors, CC-BY-SA Figure 1 - Site Location & Minor Watersheds The Shores of Oneka Lake (KES 2021-225)Washington County, Hugo, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 1,500 Feet Legen d Project Boundary Major Watersheds Minor Watersheds Source: ESRI Streets Basemap Clearwater Cre ek and Harwood Cre ek minor watersheds are part of the Rice Creek Wate rshed District and BSA7 Oneka (82-140 P) Figure 2 - Existing Conditions (2020 Metro Photo), PWI, & Shoreland The Shores of Oneka Lake (KES 2021-225)Hugo, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 500 Feet Legend Project Boundary Shoreland Overlay Tributary Wetland Boundary Public Waters Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons Wetland 50.65-ac onsite Wetland 14.56-ac onsiteof which3.03-ac is T1 Wetland 41.91-ac onsite Wetland 2/613.92-ac Wetland 71.74-ac onsite Wetland 32.86-ac onsite Tributary T1~2,500 linear ft onsitenon-103E ditch Wetland 80.04-ac Overhead Electrical LinesOHWL = 931.2" NGVD 1000-ft WL21.68--ac WL6 WL612.24-ac Oneka (82-140 P) Figure 4 - Proposed Plan and Wetland/Tributary Impacts Shores of Oneka Lake (KES 2021-225)Hugo, Minnesota Note: Boundaries indicatedon this figure are approximate and do not constitute an official survey product. ¯0 500 Feet Project Boundary Tributary Impact (140 ft; 0.0759-ac) Tributary Shoreland Overlay Boardwalk Footprint Trail Wetland Fill Wetland Excavation Wetland Boundary Borrow Pond Stormpond or Reuse Pond Source: MNGEO Spatial Commons Tributary T1/WCA Wetland WL1-N WL8 WL1-S WL2/6-W WL3 WL4 WL5 Boardwalk Footprint0.02-ac w/i WL6 Trail located on upland ice ridge WL2/6-E WL2/6-M WL2/6-B WL1-N2 WL1-N3 Se e gradi ng pl an f or i mpact are a de tai l s Reuse PondLake 1000 Impact ID Fill or Excavation Impact Amount (ac)WL1-N Fil l 0.1889WL1-S Fil l 0.1034WL3Fill0.1731WL4Fill0.0426WL5Fill0.1463WL 2/6-W Fil l 0.0152WL 2/6-M Fil l 0.1655WL 2/6-E Fil l 0.1037WL 8 Fil l 0.0132WL1-N2 Excavati on 0.0338WL1-N3 Excavati on 0.0088Total0.9945 Agenda Number: G.16 CITY OF HUGO PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Matthew and Derek Pacula – Encroachment agreement to allow a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 16094 Fairoaks Avenue North. DATE: June 2, 2022 for the City Council meeting of June 6, 2022 ZONING: Planned Unit Development (PUD) LAND USE: Low Density Residential (LD) 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: July 5, 2022 1.DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant has requested an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on property located at 16094 Fairoaks Avenue North. The Senior Engineering Technician has reviewed the location of the fence and is comfortable with the request. 2.CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff has reviewed the request and recommends that the City Council approve the encroachment agreement for the property located at 16094 Fairoaks Avenue North. ATTACHMENTS: 1.Encroachment Agreement Resolution 2.Encroachment Agreement 3.Survey RESOLUTION 2022-_____ APPROVING AN ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT FOR MATTHEW AND DEREK PACULA TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF A FENCE WITHIN A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 16094 FAIROAKS AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, an application has been filed by Matthew and Derek Pacula that requests approval of an encroachment agreement to allow construction of a fence within a drainage and utility easement on the property located at 16094 Fairoaks Avenue North, legally described as follows; Lot 15, Block 6, Oneka Place, Washington County, Minnesota WHEREAS, the City Council has fully considered the request for the encroachment agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the encroachment agreement on property located at 16094 Fairoaks Avenue North. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6th day of June, 2022. ________________________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: _________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk ENCROACHMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made this 6th day of June, 2022 by and between the CITY OF HUGO, a Minnesota municipality (hereinafter “City”) and, Matthew and Derek Pacula (hereinafter “Owners”), and their successors in title. WHEREAS, the City has an easement for drainage and utility purposes (the “Easement”) along the northerly, westerly, and southerly portion of the Owner’s property, which is legally described as: Lot 15, Block 6, Oneka Place, Washington County, Minnesota; and, WHEREAS, Owner is desirous of constructing a fence partially within the easement area; and, WHERAS, the City will permit the placement of a fence in the area described herein subject to the terms and conditions hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and for good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is acknowledged, the City will permit the encroachment on its easement as set forth herein and subject to the conditions set forth below: 1. Owner and their successors in title may install and maintain a fence within the Easement, and the fence shall be constructed in accordance with the plans on file with the City of Hugo. 2. No plantings, trees, permanent improvements or structures other than the fence may be maintained or placed in the easement area. 3. Owner shall maintain the fence in good repair and shall not permit it to be expanded, lengthened or to impair the City’s easement or its rights thereunder in any respect. 4. The encroachment granted to Owner herein is subject to the existing easement rights of the City as granted in various easements. 5. The City will notify Owner if it requires removal or relocation of the fence or any part of it. Thereafter, Owner shall remove the fence according to the direction of the City and if Owner fails to do so, the City may enter upon the land and remove as much of the fence as required and cast it upon the adjoining lands. In such an event, the City shall not be liable to Owner for any costs, loss or damage whatsoever, and may assess the property for all of its costs incurred in removing the fence, and Owner waive all formalities, requirements and defenses arising from or relating to Minnesota Statutes Section 429 relating to or arising from the work done by the City. 6. To the fullest extent permitted by law, Owner agrees to release, defend, protect, indemnify, save and hold harmless the City, its agents, directors, employees, shareholders and contractors against any and all claims, costs and liabilities, including the costs of defense for damages, injury or death arising from or in any way connected to the installation, maintenance, repair, removal and/or presence of the fence, regardless of whether such harm is to Owner, the City, the employees or officers, guests or invitees of either or any other person or entity, except Owner shall not be liable under this paragraph for loss or damage to the extent resulting from the negligence of the indemnified parties. 7. The permission granted herein is limited exclusively to the proposed fence within the specified portion of the easement area of the City’s Easement. Owner shall not alter the grade or permit such alteration anywhere upon the land upon which the City has reserved its easement rights without proper express written consent of the City. 8. Owner shall, at all times, use their best efforts to conduct all of their activities on said Easement in such a manner as to not interfere with or impede the operation of the City’s Easement and related activities in any manner whatsoever, and shall follow the direction of the City. 9. This Agreement shall run with the land and inure to the benefit and be binding upon the parties hereto, their heirs, successors and assigns. 10. Owner shall be responsible for the costs of recording this Agreement with the Washington County Recorder. WHEREUPON, the parties have set their hands this day of , 2022. CITY OF HUGO By By Tom Weidt, Mayor Michele Lindau, City Clerk STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this _____ day of __________________, 2022, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared TOM WEIDT and MICHELE LINDAU, of the City of Hugo, a Minnesota municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Hugo by the authority of the City Council of the City of Hugo, and TOM WEIDT and MICHELE LINDAU acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City of Hugo. __________________________________________ Notary Public Matthew Pacula, Owner _____________________________________ Derek Pacula, Owner STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. (Individual Notary) COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this _____ day of __________________, 2022, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Matthew and Derek Pacula, a married couple, who signed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged said instrument to be his free act and deed. __________________________________________ Notary Public THIS INSTRUMENT DRAFTED BY: David K. Snyder Johnson & Turner, P.A. 56 East Broadway Avenue, Suite 206 Forest Lake, MN 55025 (651) 464-7292 CITY OF HUGO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Construction Payment Request #19 Hugo Public Works Facility Ebert Construction DATE: For the City Council Meeting of June 6, 2022 BACKGROUND Please find the enclosed application for payment for the City of Hugo Public Works Facility project in the amount of $6,314.89. The quantities completed to date have been reviewed and agreed upon by the architect, contractor and city staff. The amount indicated above reflects the work certified through April 30, 2022 with a 5% retainage applied. Total retainage being held for the project to date is $474,038.42. DESIRED ACTION Staff recommends the City Council approve payment request #19 in the amount of $6,314.89 to Ebert Construction for the construction of the City of Hugo Public Works facility. CITY OF HUGO CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director SUBJECT: Construction Payment Request #20 Hugo Public Works Facility Ebert Construction DATE: For the City Council Meeting of June 6, 2022 BACKGROUND Please find the enclosed application for payment for the City of Hugo Public Works Facility project in the amount of $123,360.60. The quantities completed to date have been reviewed and agreed upon by the architect, contractor and city staff. The amount indicated above reflects the work certified through May 31, 2022 with a 5% retainage applied. Total retainage being held for the project to date is $480,531.08. DESIRED ACTION Staff recommends the City Council approve payment request #20 in the amount of $123,360.60 to Ebert Construction for the construction of the City of Hugo Public Works facility. Agenda Number J.1 CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: FROM: Bryan Bear, City Administrator Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Liberty Classical Academy. Site plan request to additional parking and enhanced main entrance on the existing school located at 10158 122nd Street North. DATE: June 2, 2022 for the City Council Meeting of June 6, 2022 ZONING: Agricultural (AG) LAND USE: Public/Quasi Public 60-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: June 13, 2022 1.PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE: At its May 26, 2022, meeting the Planning Commission considered the request. Staff recommended approval of the site plan request. A representative from the school provided background on the school and the site plan request. The Planning Commission agreed that the request met the requirements necessary to approve the site plan. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the site plan request, subject to the conditions in the resolution. 2.DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant is seeking approval of site plan for additional parking and enhanced main entrance to the existing school located at 10158 122nd Street North. 3.BACKGROUND: The property was previously used as Withrow Elementary school in the Stillwater School District. The school was closed in 2018 and has been vacant since that time. Liberty Classical Liberty Classical Academy Site Plan Page 2 Academy private school has purchased the property. The school will be used for their pre-k through 2nd grade education program. 4. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The properties to the north, west, east, and south are zoned Agricultural (AG) and are occupied by agricultural uses and homes on large lots. B. Natural Characteristics of Site The site is 8.97 acres and consists of the existing elementary school and associated fields and parking. The property does not have wetlands on site. 5. ANALYSIS: A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. B. Consistency with Ordinance Standards Site Plan Elementary School The site consists of the elementary school and community gymnasium and is approximately 33,000 square feet. The applicant is proposing an approximately 1,800 square foot addition to create a canopy at the main entrance. There will also be an addition to the existing parking lot on the east side of the building. The additional parking allowed for better circulation for drop-off and pick-up. The school does not have busing, it is all parent drop-off and pick-up. The applicant is also planning on interior renovation of the school. Setbacks All setback requirements have been met with this application. Streets and Access The existing site has access from 122nd/CR 7. The site has sufficient access and the proposed additions does not require additional access. Liberty Classical Academy Site Plan Page 3 MnDOT did review the plans and provided a comment letter dated May 4, 2022. They stated an access permit is not required at this time since they are not proposed new access point and the use is remaining a school. They did have some recommendations if the site expands and traffic increases. Parking The existing site has one parking lot totaling 38 parking spaces and the applicant is proposing an additional 30 parking spaces, totaling 68 parking spaces and meeting the ordinance requirements. Staff is comfortable with this proposal. Sidewalks/Trails There are existing sidewalks that connect the building and parking lots. The proposed addition will disrupt a small portion of sidewalk along the south side of the building, which will be reconstructed to wrap around the addition. Additional side walk will also be construct with the additional parking on the west side of the building. Landscaping The applicant has existing landscaping on site that meets the ordinance standards. Building Materials The addition is proposed to be constructed primarily cement siding and a color to match the existing materials on site. The applicant has not submitted a material sample board. Staff approval of a material sample board is required prior to issuance of a building material to ensure materials and colors will be cohesive throughout the building. Grading/Drainage The site is within the Brown’s Creek Watershed District (BCWD) and will be required to get a permit from the BCWD. Conditional approval of the permit is anticipated at the May 11th BCWD Board Meeting. The City is reviewing for all requirements more stringent than the BCWD standards. Utilities The existing building is connected to well and septic. The applicant will need to ensure the well and septic is compliant with State and County regulations. C. Conclusion Liberty Classical Academy Site Plan Page 4 Staff has reviewed the site plan for consistency with the applicable standards outlined in the City Code and finds that the application is consistent with the standards. 6. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the site plan request submitted by Liberty Classical Academy for the property located at 10158 122nd Street North, subject to the conditions listed in the resolution. 7. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission agreed that the request met the requirements necessary to approve the site plan. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the site plan request, subject to the conditions in the resolution. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Approving Resolution 3. Engineer memo dated May 4, 2022 4. Washington County email dated May 4, 2022 5. Site Plan Submittal 122nd Street NorthKeller Avenue NorthKeystone Avenue NorthLiberty Classical Site Plan Location Map Hugo, MN Site Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary ¯0 250Feet1 in = 250 feet Document Path: S:\Mapping\Emily\LocationSite Maps\2022\Liberty Classical.mxdSite RESOLUTION 2022-XX APPROVING A SITE PLAN REQUEST FROM LIBERTY CLASSICAL ACADEMY SCHOOL TO ALLOW AN ADDITION ON THE EXISTING SCHOOL LOCATED AT 10158 122ND STREET NORTH WHEREAS, Liberty Classical Academy has requested site plan approval for an approximately 2,000 square foot addition and additional parking to be constructed on to the existing elementary school on property located at 10158 122nd Street North that is legally described as follows: See attached. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said site plan on May 12, 2022, and recommends approval subject to the conditions listed in this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the site plan for White Bear Lake Area Schools with the following findings: 1. A site plan is approved to allow construction of an approximately 10,000 square foot square foot addition with the plans dated March 18, 2022, and April 14, 2022. 2. The applicant shall obtain all necessary local, state, and federal permits. Prior to Building Permit Approval: 3. All items on the Engineer’s memo and “red-line” detailed engineering comments that have been sent directly to the applicant’s engineer dated May 4, 2022, shall be addressed. 4. The applicant shall submit the final building material sample board to be reviewed and approved by staff. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy: 5. A final lighting plan shall be reviewed and approved by staff. 6. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated to the City over the stormwater management facilities and applicable utilities. 7. A maintenance agreement for the stormwater management facilities shall be recorded against the property. Resolution 2022-XX Page 2 ADOPTED by the City Council this 6th day of June, 2022 _______________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk C:\Users\rachel.juba\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\O7PY7DSU\020119-000 LTR RJuba- Liberty Classical Academy 2022-05- 04.docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM May 4, 2022 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Site Plan Review Liberty Classical Academy WSB Project No. 020119-000 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the site plan submittal for the Liberty Classical Academy site located east of Keller Avenue/County Road 57 and north of 122nd Street/County Road 7. In particular, we have reviewed the following plans related to this particular request: • Civil Plan Set (Liberty Classcial Academy- Civil Plans 4-11-22 bcwd revs.pdf) dated 4/11/2022 by Larson Engineering • Stormwater Report Liberty (Classical Academy Stormwater Report 2022.04.10.pdf) dated 4/10/2022 by Larson Engineering Based on the review of the above documents, we offer the following comments related to this application: Grading, Street, and Utility Plans 1. Applicant is proposing to expand their eastern parking lot to the north while constructing a new drop-off area and playground. 2. Applicant is proposing to maintain the two accesses (one-way in, one-way out) that exist along 122nd Street/ County Road 7. 3. Applicant is proposing two centrally located rows of parking (52 spaces total) with a circling drop-off area to replace the previous 30-some spaces distributed between three rows including up against the school. The new configuration allows for a much easier turnaround and a designated area for drop off. 4. Applicant is proposing installing curb around the perimeter which better directs drainage and creates a barrier for dropping off students. 5. Water service to the site is provided through an onsite well while sanitary sewer service to the site is achieved through an on-site septic system with drain fields. The utilities are not proposed to be impacted with the project. 6. Detailed redline comments have been provided on the plans and sent to the applicants engineer so they can be addressed in future submittals. Ms. Rachel Juba May 4, 2022 Page 2 Stormwater Management 7. The site is within the Brown’s Creek Watershed District (BCWD) and will be required to get a permit from the BCWD. Conditional approval of the permit is anticipated at the May 11th BCWD Board Meeting. The City is reviewing for all requirements more stringent than the BCWD standards. 8. It is unclear if the site is disturbing an acre or more and requires an NPDES permit. Applicant should confirm the disturbance area. 9. The site is proposing to meet stormwater management requirements for the new and reconstructed impervious for the expansion with an infiltration basin onsite. The site is not currently meeting the City’s rate control requirement for the 100-year storm event. 10. Stormwater plan and model comments have been provided to applicant and will need to be addressed in future submittals for documentation and permitting purposes. Wetland 11. There are no wetland impacts associated with the proposed improvements. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. Additional comments may be necessary following the review of the responses to these. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 612-419-3589. Sincerely, WSB Nick Guilliams, PE Senior Project Manager cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) 1 Rachel Juba From:Joe Gustafson <Joe.Gustafson@co.washington.mn.us> Sent:Wednesday, May 4, 2022 3:52 PM To:Rachel Juba Cc:Lyssa Leitner; Kurt Howard; Mitch Bartelt; Frank Ticknor; Ryan Hoefs; Emily Jorgensen; Wayne Sandberg; Jennifer Oehler Subject:Liberty Academy on CSAH 7 - Washington County PW Comments Caution: This email originated outside our organization; please use caution.   Hello Rachel,    Thank you for providing us with the opportunity to review and comment on the proposed site plan for the Liberty  Academy site (formerly Withrow Elementary) located at the intersection of County Road 57 (Keller Ave) and County  State Aid Highway (CSAH) 7 (122nd Street North).  Below are comments from Washington County Public Works on the  site plan and proposed usage.     A Washington County Right‐of‐way permit would be needed for any work that takes place within existing  highway right‐of‐way along CSAH 7 or along CR 57, including shoulder closures or construction vehicle staging.   Compared to other commercial or institutional uses, schools often have high peaks of vehicular traffic which can  lead to traffic conflicts on adjacent roadways.  Unfortunately, warning signs and even school speed limits have  only marginal effects on driver speeds and behaviors, and therefore it is essential for all school sites to ensure  that traffic queues and pickup/dropoff activity are fully accommodated within the site and not extending onto  adjacent highways.   The applicant contacted Washington County Public Works earlier this year to inquire about installation of school  warning signage or speed zones on the adjacent county highways and submitted a permit application for such  installation.  We notified them that such signage is not normally installed except when pedestrian crossings of  the county highway are present, or other unusual conditions that cannot be mitigated by other more effective  strategies.  Therefore, the permit application was withdrawn at the county’s recommendation.  We have not  had further contact with them.   The proposed parking lot expansion and associated traffic loop is a positive improvement that will help to  lengthen the available stacking within the site, and the proposed one‐way loop configuration is also a sensible  improvement.  It may be advantageous to explore the potential to convert two a dual‐lane queue in the future,  if and when it becomes necessary.   Will school bus service be provided to students?  The site plan does not appear to show any areas specific for  school bus queuing or staging.  Buses, naturally, take up considerable space and there is often a desire for buses  to be able to “queue jump” other vehicle traffic in order to maintain schedules.   We recommend that the city consider adopting conditions within the Conditional Use Permit that it is the  responsibility of the site operator to ensure, through site design and operating procedures, that queuing does  not extend onto the highways, and that such queuing may be considered a violation of the conditional use  permit.   It should be noted that Washington County Public Works typically requires construction of turn lanes as an  condition of an access permit when the number of daily trips exceeds approximately 100 per day.  This site is  likely to exceed that threshold, however it is not likely to need an access permit since these are not new  driveways nor are they a change in use of existing accesses, since the site is remaining an elementary  school.  The existing driveways also are within the zone of any future turn lane serving right turns onto CR 57  (Keller Ave), due to their proximity to the intersection (see next bullet).  2  It is likely that county road improvements in this area in the future could include dedicated left and right turn  lanes from CSAH 7 (122nd St) to CR 57 (Keller Ave).  Because both of the existing school driveways are within the  extent of the future right turn lane for CR 57, construction of such turn lanes could also cause some safety and  operational concerns for the driveways if they are not relocated.   The cost of any future turn lanes serving the school site driveways would be borne by the driveway owner,  however we are not requiring such construction at this time because, as noted above, these are preexisting  driveways maintaining the same usage, and therefore not requiring a new access permit at this time.   As the site expands and its traffic increases, it would be beneficial to remove the direct driveway access(es) from  CSAH 7 (122nd St) and instead service the site via CR 57 (Keller Ave).  Doing so would further elongate the  internal loop thus allowing more internal stacking , and also allow for the driveway to connect to a road with  significantly lower volumes and lower operating speeds.    Ensuring safe operations around schools is of paramount importance, and such issues can be much more difficult to  address traffic issues once site plans and permits are finalized, so we thank you again for the opportunity to review and  comment on this proposal.  Please feel free to contact us with any questions.      Joe Gustafson, PE, PTOE | Traffic Engineer  Washington County Public Works – Traffic Operations  11660 Myeron Road North, Stillwater, MN 55082  Main: 651‐430‐4300  |  Direct: 651‐430‐4351  A great place to live, work and play…today and tomorrow       From: Rachel Juba <RJuba@ci.hugo.mn.us>   Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 3:15 PM  To: Joe Gustafson <Joe.Gustafson@co.washington.mn.us>  Subject: RE: Liberty Academy ‐ Site Plan    ***External message alert: This message originated from outside the Washington County email system. Use caution  when clicking hyperlinks, downloading pictures or opening attachments.***    Joe:    Just making sure you received this email. Let me know if you have any questions.     Thanks,     RACHEL JUBA   COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR   CITY OF HUGO ‐ MINNESOTA  14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N., Hugo, MN 55038  o: 651.762.6304 | www.ci.hugo.mn.us        From: Rachel Juba   Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2022 10:15 AM  3 To: 'Joe.Gustafson@co.washington.mn.us' <Joe.Gustafson@co.washington.mn.us>  Subject: Liberty Academy ‐ Site Plan    Joe:    Attached are the plans for Liberty Academy. Can you get me comments by Thursday, May 5th?    I plan on having the application on the May 12th Planning Commission meeting.     Have you or your team been in further contact with them?    Thank you.   Rachel   Issues and Revisions: Commission No: Drawn by: Checked by: SHEET 1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SUITE 200 ST. PAUL, MN 55108-2735 (651) 642-9200 | FAX (651) 642-1101 www.popearch.com POPE ARCHITECTS, INC. 0"1/2"1" TRUE SHEET SCALE 3/18/2022 12:27:49 PM C:\Revit Projects\2021\41129-21249 LIBERTY PHASE 1 - BP2 R21_ekelly8875V.rvt AC0.1 TITLE SHEET RL EK 41129-21249 LIBERTY CLASSICAL ACADEMY PHASE 1 BID PACKAGE 2 10158 122nd ST N, HUGO, MN 55038 SHEET INDEX SHEET NUMBER SHEET NAME CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/2022GENERAL AC0.1 TITLE SHEET ✖ AC0.2 PARTITION TYPES, SYMBOLS, ABBREVIATIONS ✖ CIVIL C100 CIVIL DEMOLITION PLAN ✖ C200 PAVING PLAN ✖ C300 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN ✖ C400 UTILITY PLAN ✖ C500 DETAILS ✖ ARCHITECTURAL AC1.1 ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN AC2.1 DEMOLITION PLAN AND SECTION AC2.2 CANOPY FLOOR PLAN AC3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, EXTERIOR MATERIAL FINISH SCHEDULE ✖ AC4.1 ROOF PLAN AC5.1 BUILDING SECTIONS AC6.1 DETAILS AC9.1 REFLECTED CEILING PLAN PROJECT DIRECTORY OWNER Liberty Classical Academy 3878 Highland Ave W hite Bear Lake, MN 55110 Contact: Rebekah Hagstrom Phone: (651) 772-2777 rhagstrom@libertyclassicalacademy.org ARCHITECT Pope Architects 1295 Bandana Boulevard N, Suite 200 St. Paul, MN 55108 Contact: Elise Kelly Phone: (651) 789-1570 ekelly@popearch.com CIVIL STRUCTURAL MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL GENERAL CONTRACTOR Larson 3524 Labore Road W hite Bear Lake, MN 55110 Contact: Eric Meyer Phone: (651) 888-8112 emeyer@larsonengr.com Langer Construction 54 Moreland Ave. E. St. Paul MN 55118 Contact: Greg Okray Phone: (651) 457-7068 Greg@langerconstruction.com DESIGN BUILD DESIGN BUILD IMEG Corp. 12755 Highway 55 Suite 100 Minneapolis MN 55441 Contact: Cory Casperson Phone: (763) 595-3103 Cory.C.Casperson@imegcorp.com NORTH LOCATION MAP SITE LOCATION: LIBERTY CLASSICAL ACADEMY PHASE 1 BID PACKAGE 210158 122nd ST N, HUGO, MN 55038 10158 122nd ST N, HUGO, MN 55038 IMAGE FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY-NOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION DEFERRED SUBMITTALS 1. FIRE SPRINKLER SYSTEM DRAW INGS 2. SPECIAL INSPECTIONS BY OTHERS : CODE SUMMARY: THIS EXISTING SCHOOL BUILDING IS 32,000 SF, TYPE IIB, FULLY SPRINKLERED AND HAS AN OCCUPANCY TYPE E. THE SCOPE OF THE W ORK INCLUDES RESTRIPING AND EXTENDING THE EXISITNG PARKING LOT AND PROVIDING A NEW ENTRANCE CANOPY AT THE SOUTH, MAIN ENTRANCE. 1 CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/22 BCWD SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCITYNOTE: PHOTOMETRIC PLAN AND LAND SURVEY ARE ATTACHED TO END OF DOCUMENT FOR CITY SUBMITTAL METAL STUD GAGE AND SPACING TO BE PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EACH APPLICATION U.N.O. ALL U.L. LISTED PARTITIONS ARE TO BE CONSTRUCTED IN FULL COMPLIANCE WITH THE REFERENCED U.L. DESIGN NUMBERPARTITION TYPES NUMBER INDICATES STUD THICKNESS ("1" FOR 1 5/8" STUDS,"3" FOR 3 5/8" STUDS, ETC.) "A" INDICATES GYP. BD. ON ONE FACE OF STUDS ONLY. "B" INDICATES ONE LAYER OF GYP. BD. ON EACH FACE OF STUDS. "C" INDICATES TWO LAYERS OF GYP. BD. ON EACH FACE OF STUDS. "S" INDICATES SOUND ATTENUATING INSULATION BLANKET IN WALL CAVITY, FULL THICKNESS OF STUDS U.N.O. "X" INDICATES RATED PARTITION - ALL GYPSUM BOARD TO BE TYPE "X". "X" DESIGNATION IS NOT USED ON SHAFT WALLS (P10 SERIES) SINCE SHAFT WALLS ARE ALWAYS RATED AS PART OF THE BASIC TYPE. NUMBER INDICATES PARTITION HEAD DETAIL - SEE BELOW "L" INDICATES LEAD LINED GYPSUM BOARD. SEE PLANS FOR THICKNESS AND HEIGHT ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. USE 16 GAUGE METAL STUDS @ 12" O.C. IN PARTITIONS WHERE LEAD THICKNESS EXCEEDS 1/16" AND AT LOCATIONS REQUIRING LEAD PLATE. "V" INDICATES A 6 MIL POLY VAPOR BARRIER ON THE SIDE OF THE PARTITION AWAY FROM THE OPERATING ROOMS. SEAL VB TO ROOF DECK ABOVE AND TO FLOOR BELOW. SEAL ALL PENETRATIONS. ALL FIRE RATED WALLS, CORRIDOR SMOKE PARTITIONS & SMOKE BARRIER PARTITIONS ARE TO EXTEND TO DECK. PROVIDE BACKING/ BLOCKING IN PARTITIONS FOR WALL HUNG ITEMS.D6"6"DDDVERIFY6"D6"PARTITION HEAD TYPES 1A 2 3 4 765 PARALLEL TO JOISTS PERPENDICULAR TO JOISTS PARALLEL TO JOISTS PERPENDICULAR TO JOISTS MINERAL WOOL FIBER FIRESTOPPING STRUCTURAL DECK SECURE THIS SECTION OF PARTITION TO METAL DECK & JOIST. MATCH PART. TYPE OF PART. BELOW. FIRE CAULK AS REQUIRED FASTEN FIRE-RATED DEFLECTION TRACK TO BOTTOM OF METAL DECK JOIST BEYOND DEFLECTION HEAD CONNECTION DO NOT ATTACH STUDS TO FIRE-RATED DEFLECTION TRACK SEE PLAN FOR PARTITION TYPE FASTEN FIRE-RATED DEFLECTION TRACK TO BOTTOM OF JOIST SEE PLAN FOR PARTITION TYPE SEE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN & ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FOR CEILING TYPE EXTEND STUDS TO STRUCTURE ABOVE TO BRACE WALL AS REQUIRED SEE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN & ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FOR CEILING TYPE AT TEGULAR ACT, TRIM TILES TO LAY FLAT AT PARTITIONS SEE PLAN FOR PARTITION TYPE SEE PLAN FOR PARTITION TYPE TOP OF WALL SEE PLAN CORRIDOR SIDE CORRIDOR SIDE SECURE THIS SECTION OF PARTITION TO METAL DECK & JOIST JOIST BEYOND FASTEN LONG LEG RUNNER TRACK TO BOTTOM OF JOIST 1 LAYER OF GYP BD TO DEFLECTION HEAD - CORRIDOR SIDE ONLY SEE PLAN FOR PARTITION TYPE SEE REFLECTED CEILING PLAN & ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE FOR CEILING TYPE GYP BD TO DEFLECTION HEAD IF NO CEILING DEFLECTION HEAD CONNECTION DO NOT ATTACH STUDS TO RUNNER TRACK PARTITION TYPE 3A STRUCTURAL DECK NON-COMBUSTIBLE SMOKE STOP GYP BD TO DEFLECTION HEAD IF NO CEILING 1 LAYER OF GYP BD TO DECK - CORRIDOR SIDE ONLY IF PARTITION TYPE CALLS FOR MORE THAN 1 LAYER OF GYP BD STOP ALL BUT 1 AT 6" ABOVE CEILING FASTEN RUNNER TRACK TO BOTTOM OF JOIST PARTITION WILL EXTEND TO BOTTOM OF JOIST JOIST BEYOND STRUCTURAL DECK DFASTEN RUNNER TRACK TO BOTTOM OF JOIST GYP BD BY G.C. PARTITION FRAMING BY WELLNESS PATIENT ROOM SUPPLIER SECURE THIS SECTION OF PARTITION TO METAL DECK & JOIST PARTITION TYPE 3A JOIST BEYOND DEFLECTION HEAD CONNECTION STRUCTURAL DECK SMOKE SEAL "M" INDICATES METAL STUD MATERIAL, "W" INDICATES WOOD STUD MATERIAL. "R" INDICATES RESILIENT CHANNEL APPLIED TO COMMON SIDE OF WALL SYSTEMD1 PARALLEL TO JOISTS PERPENDICULAR TO JOISTS STRUCTURAL DECK SECURE THIS SECTION OF PARTITION TO METAL DECK & JOIST. MATCH PARTITION TYPE OF PARTITION BELOW. CAULK AS REQUIRED FASTEN DEFLECTION TRACK TO BOTTOM OF METAL DECK JOIST BEYOND DEFLECTION HEAD CONNECTION DO NOT ATTACH STUDS TO DEFLECTION TRACK SEE PLAN FOR PARTITION TYPE FASTEN DEFLECTION TRACK TO BOTTOM OF JOISTD NON-RATED CONDITION RATED CONDITION W3BX V # S L/R 12" WIDE, FULL WIDTH 5/8" GYP. BD., BRACING AT 48" O.C. MAXIMUM VERTICALLY (25 GA. STEEL STUD BRACING OPTIONAL) NOTE: THIS CONFIGURATION CAN NOT BE A FIRE RATED PARTITION 3 5/8" METAL STUDS 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 3 5/8" METAL STUDS 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD AIR SPACE 1" GYPSUM SHAFTLINER ONE HOUR WALL UL DESIGN U415 SYSTEM A 2 1/2" METAL C-H STUDS 24" O.C. 5/8" TYPE "X" GYP. BD. 3 5/8" METAL STUDS 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 1 5/8" METAL STUDS 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 1 5/8" 5/8" 2 1/4" 1A 3A 10X 20 3 5/8"5/8" 4 1/4" 5/8"2 1/2" 3 1/8" 5/8"3 5/8"BACK WALL HUNG TOILETS SEE PLAN 21" MINIMUM AT BACK TO 3 5/8"5/8" 1" GYPSUM SHAFTLINER 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 3 5/8" METAL STUDS (2) LAYERS 1/2" TYPE "X" GYP. BD. 2 1/2" METAL C-H STUDS 24" O.C. 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 1 5/8" METAL STUDS NOTE: THIS CONFIGURATION CAN NOT BE A FIRE RATED PARTITION 5/8"1 5/8"5/8" 2 7/8" 1B 3B 3BX 11X 5/8"3 5/8"5/8" 4 7/8" 1/2"1/2"2 1/2" 3 1/2" 1" GYPSUM SHAFTLINER 1/2" TYPE "X" GYP. BD. 2 1/2" METAL C-H STUDS 24" O.C. 1/2" TYPE "X" GYP. BD. (2) LAYERS 5/8" GYP. BD. 3 5/8" METAL STUDS (2) LAYERS 5/8" GYP. BD. TWO HOUR WALL UL DESIGN U419 (2) LAYERS 5/8" GYP. BD. 1 5/8" METAL STUDS (2) LAYERS 5/8" GYP. BD. 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 1 1/2" RIGID INSULATION W/ Z FURRING 4 1/8" 5/8"5/8"1 5/8"5/8"5/8" 1C 1CX 3C 3CX 12X F1 5/8"5/8"3 5/8"5/8"5/8" 6 1/8" 1/2"2 1/2"1/2" 3 1/2" 1 1/2" 5/8" 2 1/8" 1" GYPSUM SHAFTLINER 4" METAL C-H STUDS 24" O.C. 5/8" TYPE "X" GYP. BD. 6" METAL STUDS 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 2 1/2" METAL STUDS 1 1/2" FURRING CHANNELS 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 2A 6A 13X F2 2 1/2" 5/8" 3 1/8" 6"5/8" 6 5/8" 5/8"4" 4 5/8" 1 1/2"5/8" 2 1/8" 1" GYPSUM SHAFTLINER 4" METAL C-H STUDS 24" O.C. (2) LAYERS 1/2" TYPE "X" GYP. BD. 6" METAL STUDS 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 2 1/2" METAL STUDS 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD ONE HOUR WALL UL DESIGN U494 2 1/2" THICK FIBERGLASS INSUL. REQD. AT RATED PARTITION CONDITION EXISTING PARTITION - V.I.F. 5/8" GYPSUM BOARD 2B 2BX 6B 6BX 14X F3 5/8"2 1/2"5/8" 3 3/4" 5/8"6"5/8" 7 1/4" 1/2"1/2"4" 5" 5/8" (2) LAYERS 5/8" GYP. BD. 6" METAL STUDS (2) LAYERS 5/8" GYP. BD. (2) LAYERS 5/8" GYP. BD. 2 1/2" METAL STUDS (2) LAYERS 5/8" GYP. BD. TWO HOUR WALL UL DESIGN U419 1" GYPSUM SHAFTLINER 4" METAL C-H STUDS 24" O.C. 1/2" TYPE "X" GYP. BD. 1/2" TYPE "X" GYP. BD. 2C 2CX 6C 6CX 15X 5/8"5/8"2 1/2"5/8"5/8" 5" 5/8"5/8"6"5/8"5/8" 8 1/2" 1/2"4"1/2" 5" ONE HOUR WALL UL DESIGN U419 TWO HOUR WALL UL DESIGN U419 ONE HOUR WALL UL DESIGN U419 TWO HOUR WALL UL DESIGN U419 TWO HOUR WALL UL DESIGN U415 SYSTEM B TWO HOUR WALL UL DESIGN U415 SYSTEM E ONE HOUR WALL UL DESIGN U415 SYSTEM A TWO HOUR WALL UL DESIGN U415 SYSTEM B TWO HOUR WALL UL DESIGN U415 SYSTEM E ABBREVIATIONS @ AT ℄CENTER LINE, CENTER [ CHANNEL # NUMBER (POUNDS) PLATE ± PLUS OR MINUS ⌀ROUND DIAMETER SQUARE, SQUARE FOOT ∠ANGLE PL AB ANCHOR BOLT ACC ACCESSIBLE ACT ACOUSTIC CEILING TILE ADJ ADJUSTABLE AF ARCHITECTURAL FILM AFF ABOVE FINISH FLOOR AGG AGGREGATE ALT ALTERNATE ALUM ALUMINUM AP ACCESS PANEL APPROX APPROXIMATE ARCH ARCHITECT(URAL) AV AUDIO VISUAL AWP ACOUSTICAL WALL PANEL BCS BABY CHANGING STATION BD BOARD BLDG BUILDING BLKG BLOCKING BM BENCH MARK BOT BOTTOM BR BRICK BRG BEARING BRKT BRACKET BSMT BASEMENT BTWN BETWEEN CAB CABINET CB CATCH BASIN CC CUBICLE CURTAIN CD CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS CEM CEMENT CFM CUBIC FOOT PER MINUTE CG CORNER GUARD CHR CHAIR RAIL CIRC CIRCUIT (CIRCUMFERENCE) CJ CONTROL JOINT CL CENTER LINE CLG CEILING CLOS CLOSET CM CULTURED MARBLE CMU CONCRETE MASONRY UNIT CO CLEANOUT COL COLUMN CONC CONCRETE CONST CONSTRUCTION CONT CONTINUOUS CONTR CONTRACTOR CORR CORRIDOR CPT CARPET CPTB CARPET BASE CR CRASH RAIL CRS COURSE CSWK CASEWORK CT CERAMIC TILE CTB CERAMIC TILE BASE CTF CERAMIC TILE FLOOR CTW CERAMIC TILE WALL CU CUBIC CUH CABINET UNIT HEATER DEPT DEPARTMENT DET DETAIL DF DRINKING FOUNTAIN DG DECORATIVE GLASS DH DECORATIVE HARDWARE DIA DIAMETER DIM DIMENSION DISP DISPENSER DIST DISTANCE DN DOWN DP DECORATIVE PANELS DS DOWNSPOUT DWG DRAWING EA EACH EFC EPOXY FLOOR COATING EJ EXPANSION JOINT EL VERTICAL ELEVATION ELEC ELECTRIC(AL) ELEV VERTICAL ELEVATION/ ELEVATOR EM ENTRANCE MAT ENT ENTRANCE EQ EQUAL EQUIP EQUIPMENT ETC ET CETERA EW EACH WAY EWC ELECTRIC WATER COOLER EXH EXHAUST EXIST EXISTING EXP EXPOSED EXPAN EXPANSION EXT EXTERIOR FD FLOOR DRAIN FDN FOUNDATION FE FIRE EXTINGUISHER FIN FINISH FIXT FIXTURE FL FLOOR FR FIRE RATED FRMG FRAMING FRP FIBERGLASS REINFORCED PANEL FT FOOT, FEET FTG FOOTING FURR FURRING FV FIELD VERIFY GA GAUGE GALV GALVANIZED GB GRAB BAR GC GENERAL CONTRACTOR GF GLASS FILM GL GLASS OR GLAZING GL BLK GLASS BLOCK GLU-LAM GLUE LAMINATED GSF GROSS SQUARE FEET GT GROUT GTW GLASS TILE WALL GYP BD GYPSUM BOARD HDBD HARDBOARD HDCP HANDICAPPED HDWE HARDWARE HDWD HARDWOOD HT HEIGHT HM HOLLOW METAL HORIZ HORIZONTAL HP HIGH POINT HR HOUR HRL HANDRAIL HYD HYDRANT ID INSIDE DIAMETER IN INCH INSUL INSULATION INT INTERIOR INV INVERT JAN JANITOR JST JOIST JT JOINT K PL KICK PLATE KD KNOCK DOWN KO KNOCK OUT LAB LABORATORY LAM LAMINATED LAV LAVATORY LB POUND LCT LINOLEUM COMPOSITE TILE LH LEFT HAND LIN LINEAR, LINEAL LMC LINEAR METAL CEILING LP LOW POINT LT WT LIGHTWEIGHT LVT LUXURY VINYL TILE MAS MASONRY MATL MATERIAL MAX MAXIMUM MB MARKER BOARD MCB METAL COVE BASE MECH MECHANICAL MED CAB MEDICINE CABINET MEMB MEMBRANE MTL METAL MEZZ MEZZANINE MFR MANUFACTURER MH MANHOLE MIN MINIMUM MIR MIRROR MISC MISCELLANEOUS MLDG MOULDING MNTG MOUNTING MO MASONRY OPENING MT METAL TRIM MULL MULLION NIC NOT IN CONTRACT NO NUMBER NOM NOMINAL NOS NOSING NSF NET SQUARE FEET NTS NOT TO SCALE OC ON CENTER OD OUTSIDE DIAMETER OH OVERHEAD OPNG OPENING OPP OPPOSITE OZ OUNCE PART PARTITION PERF PERFORATED PL PLATE PL GL PLATE GLASS PLAM PLASTIC LAMINATE PLAS PLASTER PLBG PLUMBING PLYWD PLYWOOD PREFIN PREFINISHED PROJ PROJECTION PROP PROPERTY PT PAINT PTD PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER PTD/R PAPER TOWEL DISPENSER & RECEPTOR PVMT PAVEMENT QT QUARRY TILE QTB QUARTZ TILE BASE QTF QUARTZ TILE FLOOR QS QUARTZ SURFACE R RISER OR RADIUS RB RUBBER BASE RCP REFLECTED CEILING PLAN RD ROOF DRAIN REC RECESSED REF REFRIGERATOR REINF REINFORCED(ING) REQD REQUIRED REV REVERSE(D) RFT RESILIENT FLOOR TILE RH RIGHT HAND RM ROOM RO ROUGH OPENING ROT ROTATE(D) RR RUBBER RAIL RSF RUBBER SHEET FLOORING RSN RUBBER STAIR NOSING RUB RUBBER RV ROOF VENT RWL RAIN WATER LEADER SC SEALED CONCRETE SCHED SCHEDULE SD SOAP DISPENSER SECT SECTION SF SQUARE FOOT/FEET SHC SHOWER CURTAIN SHLVG SHELVING SHT SHEET SIM SIMILAR SL SHEET LINOLEUM SLNT SEALANT SND SANITARY NAPKIN DISPENSER SPF SPECIAL PAINT FINISH SNR SANITARY NAPKIN RECEPTOR SQ SQUARE SS STAINLESS STEEL SSB STAINLESS STEEL BASE SSM SOLID SURFACE MATERIAL ST STONE TILE STF STONE TILE FLOOR STG STORAGE STL STEEL STN STONE STRUCT STRUCTURAL STW STONE TILE WALL SUSP SUSPENDED SV SHEET VINYL SW SWITCH SYS SYSTEM T TREAD T AND G TONGUE AND GROOVE T AND B TOP AND BOTTOM TBD TO BE DETERMINED TB TOWEL BAR TEL TELEPHONE TEMP TEMPERED, TEMPORARY TERR TERRAZZO TFE TOP OF FOOTING ELEVATION TKBD TACK BOARD TOM TOP OF MASONRY TOS TOP OF STEEL TPH TOILET PAPER HOLDER TS TRANSITION STRIPS TV TELEVISION TYP TYPICAL UH UNIT HEATER UNFIN UNFINISHED UNO UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE UPH UPHOLSTERY UR URINAL USF USEABLE SQUARE FEET VAC VACUUM VB VINYL BASE VCT VINYL COMPOSITION TILE VENT VENTILATOR VERT VERTICAL VEST VESTIBULE VIF VERIFY IN FIELD W/ WITH W/O WITHOUT WC WATER CLOSET/ WALL COVERING WD WOOD WDB WOOD BASE WDC WOOD CEILING WDF WOOD FLOORING WDV WOOD VENEER WALLCOVERING WDW WINDOW WG WIRE GLASS WH WATER HEATER WI WROUGHT IRON WP WATERPROOFING/ WALL PROTECTION WR WATER RESISTANT WSCT WAINSCOT WT WEIGHT/ WINDOW TREATMENT WWF WELDED WIRE FABRIC YD YARD SYMBOLS WALL TYPE X GRIDS DETAIL WALL & BUILDING SECTION REVISIONS XXX XXX X MATCHLINEFOR CONTINUATIONSEE 1 /A101HINGE SIDE MATCHLINE SYMBOL DOOR SWING & NUMBER EXISTING DOOR TO REMAIN OPENING NUMBER ROOM NUMBER ELEVATION LAYOUT POINT FRAME TYPE V M3B S 2R X AX.X X AX.X X SIM AX.X Ref X X AX.X X EXTERIOR ELEVATION INTERIOR ELEVATION XXXEXISTING DOOR TO BE REMOVED EXISTING WALL TO REMAIN EXISTING WALL TO BE REMOVED INDICATION OF MATERIALS CONCRETE INSULATED PRECAST CONCRETE PANEL (PLAN VIEW) PRECAST CONCRETE BRICK CONCRETE BLOCK STONE STRUCTURAL STEEL ALUMINUM GYPSUM BOARD INSULATION-BATT / SOUND ATTENUATING INSULATION-RIGID INSULATION-SEMI RIGID WOOD BLOCKING WOOD (FINISH) PLYWOOD COARSE GRAVEL GRADE SAND/ARCHITECTURAL PRECAST Issues and Revisions: Commission No: Drawn by: Checked by: SHEET 1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SUITE 200 ST. PAUL, MN 55108-2735 (651) 642-9200 | FAX (651) 642-1101 www.popearch.com POPE ARCHITECTS, INC. 0"1/2"1" TRUE SHEET SCALE 3/18/2022 12:27:51 PM C:\Revit Projects\2021\41129-21249 LIBERTY PHASE 1 - BP2 R21_ekelly8875V.rvt AC0.2 PARTITION TYPES, SYMBOLS, ABBREVIATIONS RL Author 41129-21249 LIBERTY CLASSICAL ACADEMY PHASE 1 BID PACKAGE 2 10158 122nd ST N, HUGO, MN 55038 1 CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/22 BCWD SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCITY KELLER AVENUE NORTHSIGN 10158 122ND STREET NORTH122ND STREET NORTHCOVEREDWELL ACCESSSHEDTRASHENCLOSURE(FORMERLY KNOWN AS TOWNSHIP ROAD NO. 13)(FORMERLY KNOWN AS COUNTY ROAD NO. 6)ELEC. PANELSWRIP-RAP9"SPRUCE15"SPRUCE15"SPRUCE6"BOX ELDER15"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE15"SPRUCE12"WHITE PINE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE15"OAK12"MAPLE24"ASH6"LOCUST12"BASSWOOD6"ASH6"MAPLE12"ASH9"LOCUST18"MAPLEI.E=981.14 (N)15-INCH R.C.P.R.E.= 987.48I.E.= 981.6(N)I.E.= 981.7(S)ICE IN INVERTR.E.= 987.39I.E.= 981.7(N)I.E.= 981.8(S)R.E.= 987.54I.E.= 982.9(E)R.E.= 987.52I.E.= 982.7(E)I.E.= 983.0(NW)R.E.= 987.28I.E.= 982.0(N)I.E.= 981.8(S)I.E.= 982.5(W)R.E.= 987.49I.E.= 982.3(NW)I.E.= 982.2(SE)I.E.= 982.6(W)R.E.= 987.49I.E.= 982.9(E)I.E.= 983.1(SW)I.E.= 983.2(NW)R.E.= 987.54I.E.= 982.3(SE)I.E.= 983.4(SW)12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH R.C.P.SHED15" CMP15" CMP24" CMP12" CMPBORING 3BORING 2BORING 1BORING 41234566555532222115771098343524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comC 2022 Larson Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.P:\Projects\Projects - 2022\12226016 - Liberty Classical Acad Hugo - Pope\C. Design\Drawing Files\12226016 C100.dwgLarsonEngineering, Inc.Eric G. Meyer, P.E.Date: Lic. No.:03.22.2244592I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the state of Minnesota.0NORTH102040Issues and Revisions:Commission No:Drawn by:Checked by:SHEET1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SUITE 200ST. PAUL, MN 55108-2735(651) 642-9200 | FAX (651) 642-1101www.popearch.comPOPE ARCHITECTS, INC.EGMKBK12226016LIBERTY CLASSICALACADEMY PHASE 110158 122nd ST N,HUGO, MN 55038BP2 - Permit Set3-22-22BCWD Comments4-11-22REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTINGBITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONREMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTINGCONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTIONCLEAR AND GRUBTREE PROTECTIONSYMBOL LEGENDREMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT/CURB.REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT.REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF TREE, STUMP, AND ROOTS.BUILDING / MISCELLANEOUS DEMOLITION, BY OTHERS.SEE ELECTRICAL.REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF HOCKEY BOARDS.REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF BASKETBALL HOOP.REMOVE AND DISPOSE EXISTING FLAGPOLE.REMOVE AND SALVAGE EXISTING SIGN, RETURN TO OWNER.REMOVE AND REINSTALL EXISTING FENCING.KEY NOTESDEMOLITION NOTES1.Verify all existing utility locations.2.It is the responsibility of the Contractor to perform or coordinate allnecessary utility demolitions and relocations from existing utility locationsto all onsite amenities and buildings. These connections include, but arenot limited to, water, sanitary sewer, cable tv, telephone, gas, electric,site lighting, etc.3.Prior to beginning work, contact Gopher State Onecall (651-454-0002) tolocate utilities throughout the area under construction. The Contractorshall retain the services of a private utility locator to locate the privateutilities.4.Sawcut along edges of pavements, sidewalks, and curbs to remain.5.All construction shall be performed in accordance with state and localstandard specifications for construction.DEMOLITIONPLANC10012345678910 262615KELLER AVENUE NORTH10158 122ND STREET NORTH122ND STREET NORTHCOVEREDWELL ACCESSSHEDTRASHENCLOSURE(FORMERLY KNOWN AS TOWNSHIP ROAD NO. 13)(FORMERLY KNOWN AS COUNTY ROAD NO. 6)WRIP-RAP9"SPRUCE15"SPRUCE15"SPRUCE6"BOX ELDER15"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE15"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE15"OAK12"MAPLE6"LOCUST12"BASSWOOD6"MAPLE12"ASH9"LOCUST18"MAPLEI.E=981.14 (N)15-INCH R.C.P.R.E.= 987.48I.E.= 981.6(N)I.E.= 981.7(S)ICE IN INVERTR.E.= 987.39I.E.= 981.7(N)I.E.= 981.8(S)R.E.= 987.54I.E.= 982.9(E)R.E.= 987.52I.E.= 982.7(E)I.E.= 983.0(NW)R.E.= 987.28I.E.= 982.0(N)I.E.= 981.8(S)I.E.= 982.5(W)R.E.= 987.49I.E.= 982.3(NW)I.E.= 982.2(SE)I.E.= 982.6(W)R.E.= 987.49I.E.= 982.9(E)I.E.= 983.1(SW)I.E.= 983.2(NW)R.E.= 987.54I.E.= 982.3(SE)I.E.= 983.4(SW)12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH R.C.P.15" CMP15" CMP24" CMP12" CMPBORING 3BORING 2BORING 1BORING 4CB-1 (BEEHIVE)RIM = 985.61INV = 982.95110 LF 8" HDPE @ 1.0%CONNECT TOEXISTING CBINV = 981.8*18'18'28'28'9'8'28'1112223334567788910SODSEED1SEED1SEED1SEED1SODSODSODSODMULCHMULCH11113524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comC 2022 Larson Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.P:\Projects\Projects - 2022\12226016 - Liberty Classical Acad Hugo - Pope\C. Design\Drawing Files\12226016 C200.dwgLarsonEngineering, Inc.Eric G. Meyer, P.E.Date: Lic. No.:03.22.2244592I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the state of Minnesota.0NORTH102040Issues and Revisions:Commission No:Drawn by:Checked by:SHEET1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SUITE 200ST. PAUL, MN 55108-2735(651) 642-9200 | FAX (651) 642-1101www.popearch.comPOPE ARCHITECTS, INC.EGMKBK12226016LIBERTY CLASSICALACADEMY PHASE 110158 122nd ST N,HUGO, MN 55038BP2 - Permit Set3-22-22BCWD Comments4-11-22NEW LIGHT-DUTYBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSEE DETAIL 1/C500NEW BITUMINOUS SEAL COATSEE DETAIL 11/C500NEW LIGHT-DUTYCONCRETE PAVEMENTSEE DETAIL 2/C500NEW 12" THICK ENGINEERED WOOD FIBERSURFACINGINFILTRATION BASIN SOILS AND PLANTINGSWITH 4" SHREDDED WOOD MULCHSEED RESTORATIONSOD RESTORATIONCOLORED SHREDDED MULCH, 4" THICK, OVERWEED BARRIER FABRIC.SYMBOL LEGENDNOTE: THE CONCRETE JOINTS ARE SHOWN ONLY FORGENERAL REFERENCE TO SIGNIFY LIGHT-DUTYCONCRETE PAVEMENT. ACTUAL JOINTS SHALL BECONSTRUCTED PER PROJECT SPECIFICATIONS.LANDSCAPEPLANC200PLANPAVING ANDNEW CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER, SEE DETAIL 3/C500.NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT, SEE DETAIL 1/C500.NEW CONCRETE PAVEMENT, SEE DETAIL 2/C500.NEW PLAYGROUND, BY OWNER.NEW ADA PARKING SIGN, SEE DETAIL 5/C500.NEW ADA ACCESS AISLE SIGNNEW ADA LOADING ZONE SIGNNEW CURB RAMP, SEE DETAIL 4/C500.NEW CANOPY, SEE ARCHITECTURAL.NEW FLAGPOLE, SEE DETAIL 13/C500.NEW CRIMSON OAK, SEE DETAIL 14/C500.KEY NOTES12345678910INFILTRATION BASIN PLANTING SCHEDULE (2" PLUGS)QUANTITYLATIN NAMECOMMON NAME4ARONIA MELANOCARPABLACK CHOKEBERRY4CORNUS RACEMOSAGREY DOGWOOD28PANICUM VIRGATUMSWITCHGRASS20EUPATORIUM PURPUREUMJOE-PYE WEED34CAREX VULPINOIDEAFOX SEDGE42LIATRIS SPICATAMARSH BLAZING STAR18IRIS VERSICOLORBLUE FLAG IRIS32ASCLEPIAS TUBEROSABUTTERFLY WEED38ASCLEPIAS INCARNATASWAMP MILKWEEDLANDSCAPING NOTES1.Landscape Contractor is responsible for coordination with other contractors to protect the newimprovements during landscape work activities. Report any damage to the General Contractorimmediately.2.Plant size and species substitutions must be approved in writing prior to acceptance in the field.3.Landscape Contractor is responsible for ongoing maintenance of all newly installed material until time ofowner acceptance. Any acts of vandalism or damage which may occur prior to owner acceptance shallbe the responsibility of the contractor. Contractor shall provide the owner with a maintenance programincluding, but not limited to, pruning, fertilization and disease/pest control.4.Landscape Contractor shall provide the owner with a watering schedule appropriate to the project siteconditions and to plant material growth requirements.5.Landscape Contractor shall guarantee newly planted material through one calendar year from the dateof written owner acceptance. Plants that exhibit more than 10% die-back damage shall be replaced atno additional cost to the owner. The contractor shall also provide adequate tree wrap and deer/rodentprotection measures for the plantings during the warranty period.6.Restore all disturbed turf areas with 4" of good quality topsoil and seed or sod as indicated. Topsoilshall not be placed in the infiltration basin. For infiltration basin areas refer to detail 10/C500 forconstruction and restoration.SODSEED1MULCH11 988.10 FFE*986.97 TC986.47 GL1.5%988.1 FFE*985.88 C*985.98 C*5.0% max987.27 TC986.77 GL987.27 TC986.77 GL987986988INFILTRATION BASIN 1BOTTOM = 983.00100-YR HWL = 986.39985983984985983984986987986986987987EOF = 986.25EOF = 986.2OVER-EXCAVATE BOTTOM OF BASINUNTIL SILTY SANDS, SP-SM, SOILSARE ENCOUNTERED (APPROX. 1' - 3').BACKFILL WITH CLEAN, FREEDRAINING SOIL.KELLER AVENUE NORTH10158 122ND STREET NORTH122ND STREET NORTHCOVEREDWELL ACCESSSHEDTRASHENCLOSURE(FORMERLY KNOWN AS TOWNSHIP ROAD NO. 13)(FORMERLY KNOWN AS COUNTY ROAD NO. 6)WRIP-RAP9"SPRUCE15"SPRUCE15"SPRUCE6"BOX ELDER15"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE15"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE15"OAK12"MAPLE6"LOCUST12"BASSWOOD6"MAPLE12"ASH9"LOCUST18"MAPLEI.E=981.14 (N)15-INCH R.C.P.R.E.= 987.48I.E.= 981.6(N)I.E.= 981.7(S)ICE IN INVERTR.E.= 987.39I.E.= 981.7(N)I.E.= 981.8(S)R.E.= 987.54I.E.= 982.9(E)R.E.= 987.52I.E.= 982.7(E)I.E.= 983.0(NW)R.E.= 987.28I.E.= 982.0(N)I.E.= 981.8(S)I.E.= 982.5(W)R.E.= 987.49I.E.= 982.3(NW)I.E.= 982.2(SE)I.E.= 982.6(W)R.E.= 987.49I.E.= 982.9(E)I.E.= 983.1(SW)I.E.= 983.2(NW)R.E.= 987.54I.E.= 982.3(SE)I.E.= 983.4(SW)12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH R.C.P.98598398498698798098098198198298298898898898898898898898898198198298215" CMP15" CMP24" CMP12" CMPBORING 3BORING 2BORING 1BORING 4SILT FENCESILT FENCESILT FENCEBIO-LOGINLET PROTECTION, TYPSILT FENCE3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comC 2022 Larson Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.P:\Projects\Projects - 2022\12226016 - Liberty Classical Acad Hugo - Pope\C. Design\Drawing Files\12226016 C300.dwgLarsonEngineering, Inc.Eric G. Meyer, P.E.Date: Lic. No.:03.22.2244592I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the state of Minnesota.0NORTH102040Issues and Revisions:Commission No:Drawn by:Checked by:SHEET1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SUITE 200ST. PAUL, MN 55108-2735(651) 642-9200 | FAX (651) 642-1101www.popearch.comPOPE ARCHITECTS, INC.EGMKBK12226016LIBERTY CLASSICALACADEMY PHASE 110158 122nd ST N,HUGO, MN 55038BP2 - Permit Set3-22-22BCWD Comments4-11-22PROPOSED CONTOURS - MAJOR INTERVALGRADE BREAK LINEPROPOSED CONTOURS - MINOR INTERVAL949950950EXISTING CONTOURS2.0%950.00 TC949.50 GLGRADE SLOPESPOT ABBREVIATIONS:TC - TOP OF CURBGL - GUTTER LINEGO - GUTTER OUTB - BITUMINOUSC - CONCRETEEO - EMERGENCY OVERFLOWTW - TOP OF WALLBW - BOTTOM OF WALL (F/G)(*) - EXISTING TO BE VERIFIEDSILT FENCE, SEE DETAIL 7/C500ROCK CONST. ENTRANCE, FIELD LOCATE, DETAIL 6/C500INLET PROTECTION, SEE DETAIL 9/C5001.Owner and Contractor shall obtain MPCA-NPDES permit. Contractor shall be responsible for allfees pertaining to this permit. The SWPPP shall be kept onsite at all times.2.Install temporary erosion control measures (inlet protection, silt fence, and rock constructionentrances) prior to beginning any excavation or demolition work at the site.3.Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the absolute minimum. Thecontractor shall install temporary earth dikes, sediment traps or basins, additional siltation fencing,and/or disk the soil parallel to the contours as deemed necessary to further control erosion. Allchanges shall be recorded in the SWPPP.4.All construction site entrances shall be surfaced with crushed rock across the entire width of theentrance and from the entrance to a point 50' into the construction zone.5.The toe of the silt fence shall be trenched in a minimum of 6”. The trench backfill shall becompacted with a vibratory plate compactor.6.All grading operations shall be conducted in a manner to minimize the potential for site erosion.Sediment control practices must be established on all down gradient perimeters before any upgradient land disturbing activities begin.7.All exposed soil areas must be stabilized as soon as possible to limit soil erosion but in no caselater than 14 days after the construction activity in that portion of the site has temporarily orpermanently ceased. Temporary stockpiles without significant silt, clay or organic components(e.g., clean aggregate stockpiles, demolition concrete stockpiles, sand stockpiles) and theconstructed base components of roads, parking lots and similar surfaces are exempt from thisrequirement.8.The normal wetted perimeter of any temporary or permanent drainage ditch or swale that drainswater from any portion of the construction site, or diverts water around the site, must be stabilizedwithin 200 lineal feet from the property edge, or from the point of discharge into any surfacewater. Stabilization of the last 200 lineal feet must be completed within 24 hours after connectingto a surface water. Stabilization of the remaining portions of any temporary or permanent ditchesor swales must be complete within 14 days after connecting to a surface water and construction inthat portion of the ditch has temporarily or permanently ceased.9.All riprap shall be installed with a filter material or soil separation fabric and comply with theMinnesota Department of Transportation Standard Specifications.10.All storm sewer catch basins not needed for site drainage during construction shall be covered toprevent runoff from entering the storm sewer system. Catch basins necessary for site drainageduring construction shall be provided with inlet protection.11.In areas where concentrated flows occur (such as swales and areas in front of storm catch basinsand intakes) the erosion control facilities shall be backed by stabilization structure to protect thosefacilities from the concentrated flows.12.Inspect the construction site once every seven days during active construction and within 24hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. All inspections shall be recordedin the SWPPP.13.All BMPs must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented when they become nonfunctional or thesediment reaches 1/3 of the capacity. These repairs must be made within 24 hours of discovery,or as soon as field conditions allow access. All repairs shall be recorded in the SWPPP.14.If sediment escapes the construction site, off-site accumulations of sediment must be removed ina manner and at a frequency sufficient to minimize off-site impacts.15.All soils tracked onto pavement shall be removed daily.16.All infiltration areas must be inspected to ensure that no sediment from ongoing constructionactivity is reaching the infiltration area and these areas are protected from compaction due toconstruction equipment driving across the infiltration area.17.Temporary soil stockpiles must have silt fence or other effective sediment controls, and cannot beplaced in surface waters, including stormwater conveyances such as curb and gutter systems, orconduits and ditches unless there is a bypass in place for the stormwater.18.Collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, floating debris, paper, plastic, fabric,construction and demolition debris and other wastes must be disposed of properly and mustcomply with MPCA disposal requirements.19.Oil, gasoline, paint and any hazardous substances must be properly stored, including secondarycontainment, to prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Restricted access to storage areas mustbe provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste must be incompliance with MPCA regulations.20.External washing of trucks and other construction vehicles must be limited to a defined area of thesite. Runoff must be contained and waste properly disposed of. No engine degreasing is allowedonsite.21.All liquid and solid wastes generated by concrete washout operations must be contained in aleak-proof containment facility or impermeable liner. A compacted clay liner that does not allowwashout liquids to enter ground water is considered an impermeable liner. The liquid and solidwastes must not contact the ground, and there must not be runoff from the concrete washoutoperations or areas. Liquid and solid wastes must be disposed of properly and in compliance withMPCA regulations. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility to inform concreteequipment operators to utilize the proper facilities.22.Upon completion of the project and stabilization of all graded areas, all temporary erosion controlfacilities (silt fences, hay bales, etc.) shall be removed from the site.23.All permanent sedimentation basins must be restored to their design condition immediatelyfollowing stabilization of the site.24.Contractor shall submit Notice of Termination for MPCA-NPDES permit within 30 days after FinalStabilization.EROSION CONTROL NOTESGRADING NOTES1.Tree protection consisting of snow fence or safety fence installed at thedrip line shall be in place prior to beginning any grading or demolitionwork at the site.2.All elevations with an asterisk (*) shall be field verified. If elevationsvary significantly, notify the Engineer for further instructions.3.Grades shown in paved areas represent finish elevation.4.Restore all disturbed areas with 4” of good quality topsoil and seed. SeeLandscape Plan for additional requirements.5.All construction shall be performed in accordance with state and localstandard specifications for construction.SYMBOL LEGENDEROSION CONTROLPLANGRADING ANDC300SEDIMENT LOG, SEE DETAIL 8/C500 KELLER AVENUE NORTH10158 122ND STREET NORTH122ND STREET NORTHCOVEREDWELL ACCESSSHEDTRASHENCLOSURE(FORMERLY KNOWN AS TOWNSHIP ROAD NO. 13)(FORMERLY KNOWN AS COUNTY ROAD NO. 6)WRIP-RAP9"SPRUCE15"SPRUCE15"SPRUCE6"BOX ELDER15"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE15"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE12"SPRUCE15"OAK12"MAPLE6"LOCUST12"BASSWOOD6"MAPLE12"ASH9"LOCUST18"MAPLEI.E=981.14 (N)15-INCH R.C.P.R.E.= 987.48I.E.= 981.6(N)I.E.= 981.7(S)ICE IN INVERTR.E.= 987.39I.E.= 981.7(N)I.E.= 981.8(S)R.E.= 987.54I.E.= 982.9(E)R.E.= 987.52I.E.= 982.7(E)I.E.= 983.0(NW)R.E.= 987.28I.E.= 982.0(N)I.E.= 981.8(S)I.E.= 982.5(W)R.E.= 987.49I.E.= 982.3(NW)I.E.= 982.2(SE)I.E.= 982.6(W)R.E.= 987.49I.E.= 982.9(E)I.E.= 983.1(SW)I.E.= 983.2(NW)R.E.= 987.54I.E.= 982.3(SE)I.E.= 983.4(SW)12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH PVC12-INCH R.C.P.15" CMP15" CMP24" CMP12" CMPBORING 3BORING 2BORING 1BORING 4CB-1 (BEEHIVE)RIM = 985.61INV = 982.95110 LF 8" HDPE @ 1.0%CONNECT TOEXISTING CBINV = 981.8*3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comC 2022 Larson Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.P:\Projects\Projects - 2022\12226016 - Liberty Classical Acad Hugo - Pope\C. Design\Drawing Files\12226016 C400.dwgLarsonEngineering, Inc.Eric G. Meyer, P.E.Date: Lic. No.:03.22.2244592I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the state of Minnesota.0NORTH102040Issues and Revisions:Commission No:Drawn by:Checked by:SHEET1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SUITE 200ST. PAUL, MN 55108-2735(651) 642-9200 | FAX (651) 642-1101www.popearch.comPOPE ARCHITECTS, INC.EGMKBK12226016LIBERTY CLASSICALACADEMY PHASE 110158 122nd ST N,HUGO, MN 55038BP2 - Permit Set3-22-22BCWD Comments4-11-22CABLE UNDERGROUND LINEFIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND LINEELECTRIC UNDERGROUND LINEELECTRIC OVERHEAD LINETELEPHONE UNDERGROUND LINESTORM SEWER PIPESANITARY SEWER PIPENATURAL GAS UNDERGROUND LINEWATERMAIN PIPELIGHT POLESTORM MANHOLEFLARED ENDCURB INLETCATCH BASINWATER SHUTOFFGATE VALVE & BOXHYDRANTSANITARY MANHOLEDRAINTILE PIPEUTILITY NOTES1.It is the responsibility of the contractor to perform or coordinate all necessary utility connections andrelocations from existing utility locations to the proposed building, as well as to all onsite amenities.These connections include but are not limited to water, sanitary sewer, cable TV, telephone, gas,electric, site lighting, etc.2.All service connections shall be performed in accordance with state and local standardspecifications for construction. Utility connections (sanitary sewer, watermain, and storm sewer)may require a permit from the City.3.The contractor shall verify the elevations at proposed connections to existing utilities prior to anydemolition or excavation.4.The contractor shall notify all appropriate engineering departments and utility companies 72 hoursprior to construction. All necessary precautions shall be made to avoid damage to existing utilities.5.Storm sewer requires testing in accordance with Minnesota plumbing code 4714.1109 wherelocated within 10 feet of waterlines or the building.6.Maintain a minimum of 7 ½' of cover over all water lines. Where 7 ½' of cover is not provided, install2” rigid polystyrene insulation (MN/DOT 3760) with a thermal resistance of at least 5 and acompressive strength of at least 25 psi. Insulation shall be 8' wide, centered over pipe with 6” sandcushion between pipe and insulation. Where depth is less than 5', use 4” of insulation.7.Install water lines 12” above sewers. Where the sewer is less than 12" below the water line (orabove), install sewer piping of materials approved for inside building use for 10 feet on each side ofthe crossing.8.See Project Specifications for bedding requirements.SYMBOL LEGENDUTILITYPLANC400 3524 Labore RoadWhite Bear Lake, MN 55110651.481.9120 (f) 651.481.9201www.larsonengr.comC 2022 Larson Engineering, Inc. All rights reserved.P:\Projects\Projects - 2022\12226016 - Liberty Classical Acad Hugo - Pope\C. Design\Drawing Files\12226016 C500.dwgLarsonEngineering, Inc.Eric G. Meyer, P.E.Date: Lic. No.:03.22.2244592I hereby certify that this plan, specifications or reportwas prepared by me or under my direct supervisionand that I am a duly licensed Professional Engineerunder the laws of the state of Minnesota.Issues and Revisions:Commission No:Drawn by:Checked by:SHEET1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SUITE 200ST. PAUL, MN 55108-2735(651) 642-9200 | FAX (651) 642-1101www.popearch.comPOPE ARCHITECTS, INC.EGMKBK12226016LIBERTY CLASSICALACADEMY PHASE 110158 122nd ST N,HUGO, MN 55038BP2 - Permit Set3-22-22BCWD Comments4-11-22DETAILSNOT TO SCALEPAVEMENT SECTIONLIGHT-DUTY BITUMINOUS1C500APPROVED SUBGRADE SOILNEW 8" BASEAGGREGATENEW 3" BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTPLACED IN 2 LIFTSNOT TO SCALECONSTRUCTION DETAILCONCRETE2C500APPROVED SUBGRADE SOILNEW 6" BASEAGGREGATENEW 4" PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETENOT TO SCALECURB & GUTTER DETAILB612 CONCRETE3C500APPROVED SUBGRADE SOIL6"12"13.5"6"7"6"BACKFILL WITH NEWGOOD QUALITYTOPSOIL AND SEED/SODNEW BITUMINOUSPAVEMENTNEW BASEAGGREGATESLOPE34" PER FT.8"R3"R3"6"SLOPE NOT TOEXCEED 1:126'PER PLAN6'6'EXCEED 1:12SLOPE NOT TOEXCEED 1:12SLOPE NOT TO< 10'1:201:20TYPE 2TYPE 14' MIN> 10'2% MAX2% MAX10'PER PLAN10'2% MAX2% MAXNOT TO SCALEACCESSIBLE RAMP DETAIL4C500NOT TO SCALESIGN AND POST DETAILACCESSIBLE PARKING5C500NOTE:ANY SIGN FREE STANDING INASPHALT PARKING LOT SHALLBE MOUNTED AS SHOWN.ACCESSIBILITY SIGN2.5 LB./FT. FLANGEDCHANNEL SIGN POST(MNDOT 3401)6"Ø SCH. 40 STEEL PIPEFILL WITH CONC. PAINTEDTRAFFIC YELLOW3500 P.S.I. CONCRETE12"Ø6"4.5'12"3'18"5'MIN. 6" OF 1" TO2" DIA ROCK.MNDOT STANDARDSPECIFICATION 3733 TYPE VPERMEABLE GEOTEXTILEFABRIC BENEATH ROCK50' MINIMUMHARD SURFACEPUBLIC ROAD18" MIN. HIGH CUT-OFF BERM TOMINIMIZE SILT RUNOFF FROM SITE.VARIES:FULL WIDTH OF EXISTINGDRIVEWAY OPENING OR20' MIN. WIDTH.NOT TO SCALEROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE6C500ENGINEERING FABRICWIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT(HIGH FLOW AREAS)METAL, WOOD POST, OR STAKE.8' MAX. SPACING, 2' INTO GROUND.NATURAL SOILDIRECTIONOF RUNOFFNOT TO SCALEINSTALLATION DETAILSILT FENCE7C500NOTE: DEPENDING UPON CONFIGURATION, ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE MESHWITH HOG RINGS, STEEL POSTS WITH WIRES, OR WOOD POSTS WITH STAPLES.FABRIC ANCHORAGETRENCH. BACKFILL WITHTAMPED NATURAL SOILFLOW8" CURLEX SEDIMENT LOGSWOOD STAKE OR SAND BAG24" MIN.WOOD STAKE TO ONLYPENETRATE NETTING,NOT CURLEX MATERIALRRGROUNDNOTES:1. STAKE OR SAND BAG SPACING SHALL BE 2 FEET O.C.NOT TO SCALESEDIMENT LOG DETAIL8C500NOT TO SCALE PROTECTION DEVICE (OR EQ.)INFRASAFE INLET9C500400 MICRON FILTERBAG IN EACH BASKET2 BASKETS WITH 400 MICRON FILTERBAGS. TO BE CHECKED PERIODICALLY ANDCLEANED OUT AFTER EACH RAIN EVENTFITS NEENAH 1642 AND1733 FRAMES OR EQUALPLANPROFILEC500NOT TO SCALECONSTRUCTION DETAILINFILTRATION BASIN10C500VARIES(PER PLAN)SLOPE PER PLAN(3:1 MAX)6" MINSLOPE PER PLAN(3:1 MAX)NOTES:1.THE EXISTING SOILS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM COMPACTION DUE TO CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC.AREAS SHALL BE STAKED AND MARKED OFF, WITH ONLY LOW IMPACT EQUIPMENT (TRACKED ORSIMILAR) ALLOWED.SHREDDED MULCH ANDNATIVE PLANTINGS, SEEPLANTING SCHEDULEEXTEND MODIFIED SOIL UP SLOPESTO POND OUTLET ELEVATIONEXISTING SOILSPRE-MIXED PLANTING MEDIUM: PLAISTED'S RAIN GARDENPEAT MIX (80% SAND, 20% PEAT),OR EQUAL. PLANTINGMEDIUM SHALL PROVIDE 4"/HR INFILTRATION RATE ATSPECIFIED COMPACTION, VERIFY W/SUPPLIER.EXCAVATE POND BOTTOM TO EXISTING PERMEABLESOILS. REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING TOPSOILAND ANY SOILS NON-CONDUCIVE TO INFILTRATION.SEE GEOTECH REPORT.18" MINLOOSEN/DECOMPACT SOIL BELOWBASIN BOTTOM, 18" MINIMUM DEPTH.REMOVE FILL SOILS TO NATIVE SP-SM SOILSAND REPLACE WITH CLEAN SAND. VERIFYON-SITE WITH GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.NOT TO SCALESEAL REPAIR DETAILRESURFACING AND CRACK11C500EXISTING BASEAGGREGATEEXISTING BITUMINOUSPAVEMENTNEW SEAL COAT RESURFACINGROUT, STERILIZE, AND SEAL WITHHOT APPLIED ELASTOMERIC CRACKSEALANT 34"x 34" MINIMUMVARIABLE1'-4"VARIABLE4'-0" TYPICAL5"MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS IS 6" FOR 14'DEPTH. INCREASE THICKNESS 1" FOR EVERY4' OF DEPTH GREATER THAN 14', AND REINFORCEWITH #4 REBAR @ 8" E.W.PRECAST CONCRETE SECTIONNOT TO SCALEMANHOLE DETAILSTORM SEWER12C5008"ALL JOINTS IN MANHOLE TO HAVE'O' RING RUBBER GASKETS.SEAL WITH 2 BEADS OF RAM-NEK.6" PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB.MANHOLE STEPS, COPOLYMER POLYPROPYLENEPLASTIC, WITH 1/2" GRADE 60 STEELREINFORCEMENT OR EQUAL, 16" O.C.PIPE SHALL BE CUT OUT FLUSHWITH INSIDE FACE OF WALL.WATERTIGHT CONNECTION(GROUT RING, TYPICAL)BEEHIVE CASTING AND COVER:NEENAH R-4353MINIMUM OF 2, MAXIMUM OF 5 CONCRETERINGS WITH FULLBED OF MORTARBETWEEN EACH AND A 4" COLLAR OUTSIDE.PLACE EXTERNAL CHIMNEY SEAL.NOT TO SCALEFOUNDATION DETAILFLAG POLE13C500SEALANT ALUMINUM COLLAR12"Ø GROUND SLEEVESANDMNDOT 3Y43CONCRETEWEDGESBASE PLATESLEEVE SUPPORTPLATE ANDGROUNDING ROD68" VERIFY WITH POLE HEIGHT42"48"8"30' FLAGPOLE WITH INTERNAL HALYARDNOT TO SCALETREE PLANTING DETAIL14C500EQUALS TWICE BALLDIAMETER12"MIN.18"MIN.OPTIONAL STAKINGMETHOD - 6' METALPOSTS AND RUBBERHOSE STRAPSHOSE LOOPS3 GUYS EACH OF10 GAUGE TWISTEDWIRE 120 DEGREESAPART AROUND TREECOLOREDFLAGS1 PER WIRETURNBUCKLE6" DEEP MULCH, HOLDBACK 2" FROM STEM.SOD24" STAKE TYP.PLACE PLANTINGMEDIUM SOILSFOLD BACKBURLAP ANDREMOVE ALLTIES &/ORWIRES FROMTOP OF BALLSCARIFY ALL SIDESAND BOTTOM OFEXCAVATED HOLEDECIDUOUS TREEAS PER SCHEDULECONIFEROUS TREEAS PER SCHEDULE EXTERIOR MATERIAL FINISH SCHEDULE PCAST - 1 MATERIAL ID MATERIAL MANUFACTURER FINISH COLOR LOCATION PRECAST CONCRETE WALL PANELS MP - 1 ALUMINUM COMPOSITE FLASH - 1 CAP FLASHING FC - 1 FIBER CEMENT LAP SIDING FC - 2 FIBER CEMENT PANELS (SOFFIT) JAMES HARDIE JAMES HARDIE SMOOTH FINISH SMOOTH FINISH NOTE: THE "BASIS OF DESIGN" MATERIALS FOR THE PROJECT ARE LISTED ON THE SCHEDULE ABOVE. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL MATERIAL INFORMATION AND OTHER APPROVE D SUBSTITUTIONS. FLASH - 2 MISC. SIDING FLASHING BONE WHITE FC - 3 FIBER CEMENT VENTED SOFFIT 16" JAMES HARDIE SMOOTH FINISH FC - 4 FIBER CEMENT TRIM BOARD 5.5" JAMES HARDIE SMOOTH FINISH FIELD PAINTED COLOR: BENJAMIN MOORE - WHITE DOVE OC-17 FCR - 1 FIBER CEMENT REVEAL JAMES HARDIE SMOOTH FINISH MOLIN EXPOSED AGGREGATE BUFF TO MATCH BRICK BASE OF COLUMNS ALPOLIC KYNAR BNT WHITE REFACE EXISTING CANOPY CGM FIRESTONE KYNAR KYNAR BONE WHITE NEW CANOPY COPING MISC. - SEE ELEVATIONS SEE ELEVATIONS SEE ELEVATIONS SEE ELEVATIONS SEE ELEVATIONS SEE ELEVATIONS FIELD PAINTED COLOR: BENJAMIN MOORE - WHITE DOVE OC-17 FIELD PAINTED COLOR: BENJAMIN MOORE - WHITE DOVE OC-17 FIELD PAINTED COLOR: BENJAMIN MOORE - WHITE DOVE OC-17 FIELD PAINTED COLOR: BENJAMIN MOORE - WHITE DOVE OC-17 FIRST LEVEL 100'-0" T.O. EXIST ROOF SLAB 111'-0" ENTRY PARAPET 114'-0" OPENING HT 109'-0" 0.2 0.1 FLASH-1 FC-4 FC-1 FLASH-2 FC-4 FLASH-2 PRECAST-1 MP-1 FIRST LEVEL 100'-0" ENTRY PARAPET 114'-0" OPENING HT 109'-0" G H I JG.1 B.O. EXIST SOFFIT 108'-0" FLASH-1 FC-4 FC-1 FLASH-2 FC-4 FLASH-2 PRECAST-1 PINMOUNT CAST ALUM SIGN -ALIGN WITH LAP SIDING AND CENTER OVER OPENINGS FONT TYPE: VERDANA HEIGHT: 1'-0" COLOR: TO BE SELECTED BY ARCHITECT WALL SCONCES PROVIDED BY OWNER INSTALLED BY CONTRACTOR FIRST LEVEL 100'-0" ENTRY PARAPET 114'-0" OPENING HT 109'-0" 0.20.1 B.O. EXIST SOFFIT 108'-0" FLASH-1 FC-4 FC-1 FLASH-2 FC-4 FLASH-2 PRECAST-1 MP-1 FLASH-2 PRECAST-1 Issues and Revisions: Commission No: Drawn by: Checked by: SHEET 1295 BANDANA BLVD N, SUITE 200 ST. PAUL, MN 55108-2735 (651) 642-9200 | FAX (651) 642-1101 www.popearch.com POPE ARCHITECTS, INC. 0"1/2"1" TRUE SHEET SCALE 3/18/2022 12:27:53 PM C:\Revit Projects\2021\41129-21249 LIBERTY PHASE 1 - BP2 R21_ekelly8875V.rvt AC3.1 EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS, EXTERIOR MATERIAL FINISH SCHEDULE Checker Author 41129-21249 LIBERTY CLASSICAL ACADEMY PHASE 1 BID PACKAGE 2 10158 122nd ST N, HUGO, MN 55038 1 CITY SUBMITTAL 03/18/22 1/4" = 1'-0"AC3.1 1 CANOPY EAST ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"AC3.1 2 CANOPY SOUTH ELEVATION 1/4" = 1'-0"AC3.1 3 CANOPY WEST ELEVATION BCWD SUBMITTAL - NOT FOR CONSTRUCTIONCITY PAGE 1 OF 1Date:2/22/2022# Date CommentsDrawn By: SANDYScale: AS NOTEDRevisionsGENERAL NOTES:A. PULSE PRODUCTS DOES NOT ASSUME RESPONSIBILITYFOR THE INTERPRETATION OF THIS CALCULATION ORCOMPLAINCE TO THE LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERALLIGHTNG CODES OR ORDINANCES.B. LIGHTING LAYOUT IS NOT INTENDED FOR CONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS BUT ONLY TO ILLUSTRATE THE PERFORMANCEOF THE PRODUCT.C. ALL READINGS/CALCULATIONS SHOWN ARE SHOWN ONOBJECTS/SURFACES.LIBERTY ACADEMYHUGO, MNChecked By: MIKE NLuminaire ScheduleCalculation SummaryLabelCalcTypeUnitsAvgMaxMinSymbolQtyLabelArrangementLLFDescriptionArr. WattsLum. LumensAvg/Min1Max/MinAA3Single0.851RAYON T349LEDB-240-XX-40K-T3 MOUNT ON 25FT POLE WITH 3FT BASE (LLF ADJUST FOR 4OK) 239.8924621SITE GROUNDIlluminanceFc1.016.810.0N.A.N.A.EAST PARKINGIlluminanceFc3.585.7AA4Single0.851RAYON T349LEDB-240-XX-40K-T4 MOUNT ON 25FT POLE WITH 3FT BASE (LLF ADJUST FOR 4OK) 239.77247083AA52Back-Back0.851RAYON T349LED-240-XX-40K-T5 MOUNT ON 25FT POLE WITH 3FT BASE (LLF ADJUST FOR 4OK) 479.74250321.32.754.38SOUTH PARKINGIlluminanceFc2.546.61.12.316.00Plan ViewScale: 1 inch= 40 Ft.AA52AA52AA52AA3AA40.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.1 0.6 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.2 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.10.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.30.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.1 0.10.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.4 2.0 2.9 3.0 2.3 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.20.2 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.6 0.60.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 0.10.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.0 1.5 2.5 4.9 5.3 3.4 1.0 0.7 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.30.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.11.0 0.8 0.7 0.5 0.3 0.20.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.6 1.0 1.5 2.3 3.5 5.7 4.9 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.4 0.61.0 0.8 0.9 0.4 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.5 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.81.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.4 0.20.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.9 1.4 2.2 3.1 4.7 4.8 1.6 0.9 0.8 0.8 0.9 1.02.5 3.8 2.0 0.9 0.7 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.8 1.2 1.7 2.3 2.7 3.1 3.2 3.1 2.72.3 1.7 1.2 0.8 0.5 0.20.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.4 0.8 1.3 2.0 3.0 4.8 5.9 2.7 1.1 1.1 1.5 2.0 3.25.8 6.8 5.1 2.8 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.9 1.1 1.5 2.2 3.1 3.9 4.4 4.6 4.4 3.93.0 2.1 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.10.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.2 1.7 2.9 5.2 4.2 2.9 1.3 1.4 1.7 2.1 3.5 5.96.6 5.4 3.1 1.9 1.5 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.5 3.6 4.7 5.4 5.6 5.4 4.7 3.62.5 1.6 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.10.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.7 1.1 1.4 2.1 2.8 2.6 2.1 1.3 1.3 1.7 2.5 3.0 3.84.3 3.6 2.8 2.3 1.6 1.3 1.2 1.4 1.9 2.8 4.0 5.1 5.6 5.5 5.6 5.1 3.92.7 1.7 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.10.0 0.0 0.1 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.7 1.7 1.6 1.3 1.4 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.52.7 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.8 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.9 2.8 4.0 5.2 5.6 5.4 5.6 5.2 4.02.7 1.7 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.10.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.3 1.1 1.3 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.91.9 1.8 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.2 1.3 1.8 2.6 3.8 4.9 5.6 5.7 5.6 4.9 3.72.5 1.6 1.0 0.5 0.3 0.10.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.51.4 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.3 1.7 2.4 3.3 4.2 4.8 5.0 4.8 4.2 3.32.3 1.5 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.10.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.3 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.7 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0 0.90.8 0.9 1.0 1.0 0.9 0.9 1.0 1.2 1.5 2.1 2.7 3.2 3.5 3.7 3.5 3.2 2.62.0 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.10.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.50.4 0.5 0.7 0.6 0.6 0.8 0.9 1.1 1.4 1.8 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.11.7 1.3 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.20.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.4 0.20.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.4 0.8 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.81.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.20.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.10.1 0.10.6 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.20.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.6 0.9 1.4 1.8 2.2 2.5 2.7 2.7 2.6 2.4 2.1 1.7 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.20.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.6 1.0 1.5 2.1 2.8 3.3 3.7 3.8 3.6 3.2 2.6 1.9 1.3 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.6 1.0 1.6 2.5 3.5 4.4 4.9 5.1 4.8 4.2 3.2 2.2 1.4 0.9 0.5 0.3 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.7 2.7 3.9 5.0 5.6 5.7 5.6 4.8 3.6 2.4 1.5 0.9 0.50.3 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.8 2.9 4.2 5.3 5.5 5.4 5.5 5.0 3.8 2.6 1.6 0.9 0.50.2 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.8 2.8 4.1 5.2 5.7 5.5 5.6 5.0 3.7 2.5 1.6 0.9 0.50.2 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.7 2.6 3.7 4.8 5.4 5.5 5.3 4.5 3.4 2.3 1.5 0.9 0.50.2 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.5 2.2 3.1 3.9 4.3 4.5 4.2 3.7 2.9 2.0 1.3 0.8 0.50.2 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.3 2.7 3.0 3.1 3.0 2.6 2.2 1.7 1.2 0.8 0.50.2 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.1 1.4 1.7 1.9 2.0 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.3 1.0 0.7 0.40.3 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1.0 1.1 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.4 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.7 0.40.3 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.3 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.2 1.0 0.9 0.7 0.40.3 0.10.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.6 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9 0.6 0.40.3 0.10.2 0.3 0.5 0.8 1.2 1.5 1.9 2.1 2.3 2.4 2.3 2.0 1.7 1.4 1.0 0.7 0.40.2 0.10.2 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.4 2.0 2.6 3.1 3.5 3.6 3.3 2.9 2.4 1.7 1.2 0.7 0.40.2 0.10.1 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.5 3.4 4.3 4.8 4.9 4.6 3.9 3.0 2.0 1.3 0.8 0.40.2 0.10.1 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.8 2.8 4.0 5.1 5.6 5.7 5.5 4.6 3.4 2.3 1.4 0.8 0.50.2 0.10.1 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.9 3.0 4.3 5.3 5.5 5.4 5.5 4.9 3.6 2.4 1.5 0.8 0.50.2 0.10.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.9 2.9 4.2 5.3 5.6 5.5 5.6 4.9 3.6 2.4 1.5 0.8 0.40.2 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.3 0.6 1.1 1.8 2.7 3.9 4.9 5.5 5.6 5.3 4.5 3.3 2.2 1.4 0.8 0.40.2 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.3 0.6 1.0 1.6 2.3 3.3 4.0 4.5 4.6 4.3 3.7 2.8 1.9 1.3 0.8 0.40.2 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.3 0.5 0.9 1.3 1.8 2.4 2.8 3.1 3.2 3.0 2.6 2.1 1.6 1.1 0.7 0.40.2 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.3 0.4 0.7 1.0 1.3 1.6 1.8 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.7 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.30.2 0.1 0.00.0 0.0 0.00.1 0.2 0.4 0.5 0.7 0.9 1.0 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.30.2 0.1 0.00.0 0.00.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.20.1 0.1 0.00.00.1 0.1 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.2 0.10.1 0.0 0.00.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.10.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.00.0 0.0 0.0 0.01 fc1 fc0.5 fc0.5 fc0.25 fc0.25 fcTYPE AA 16/2/2022 3:58 PMSu Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa123456789101112 13 14 15 16 17 1819 20 21 22 23 24 2526 27 28 29 30June 2022Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa12345678910 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 2324 25 26 27 28 29 3031July 2022June 2022May 293031Jun 12341:00pm Hugo El Celebration (14895 Francesca Ave) - 5678910116:00pm City Admin Review - 7:00pm City CouncilHugo Good Neighbor Days6:00pm FCB District Neighborhood Meet6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm12131415161718Hugo Good Neighbor DaysFlag Day (United States)7:00pm Parks Comm19202122232425Father's Day (United States)7:00pm City Council5:30pm EDA6:30pm Hist CommLMC Conference (Duluth, MN) 6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm2627282930Jul 12SUNDAYMONDAYTUESDAYWEDNESDAYTHURSDAYFRIDAYSATURDAY 26/2/2022 3:58 PMSu Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa12345678910 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 2324 25 26 27 28 29 3031July 2022Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa1234567 8 9 10 11 12 1314 15 16 17 18 19 2021 22 23 24 25 26 2728 29 30 31August 2022July 2022Jun 2627282930Jul 123456789Independence Day (United States)7:00pm City Council101112131415166:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm171819202122237:00pm City Council5:30pm EDA6:30pm Hist Comm7:00pm Parks Comm242526272829306:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm31Aug 123456SUNDAYMONDAYTUESDAYWEDNESDAYTHURSDAYFRIDAYSATURDAY