Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
2022.11.21 CC Packet
A. CALL TO ORDER B. ROLL CALL C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. November 4, 2022, Kevin Magnuson Meet and Greet 2. November 7, 2022, City Council Meeting 3. November 14, 2022, Commissioner Interviews 4. November 15, 2022, Board of Canvass E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA F. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS 1. Lakes Center for Youth & Families – Executive Director Linda Madsen G. CONSENT AGENDA All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion and a roll call vote. If a member of the City Council or the public wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and will be considered separately. 1. Approve Claims Roster 2. Approve Annual Performance Review for Accounting Clerk Amber Lozier 3. Approve Hiring of Tom Robinson, Cory Albertson, and Jennifer Verpaletse as Probationary Hugo Firefighters. 4. Approve Meredith St. Pierre as Chair of Parks Commission 5. Approve Michael Kelly and Mike Granger as New Planning Commission Members 6. Approve Valerie Boyd as New Parks Commissioner 7. Approve Jim Compton as New Parks Commissioner Alternate Member 8. Approve Donation from the Hugo American Legion to the Hugo Fire Department 9. Approve Site Plan, CUP Renewal, Variance, and Easement Vacation for Xcel Energy- 13620 Fenway Boulevard N. 10. Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for Xcel Enery-13620 Fenway Boulevard N. 11. Approve State of Minnesota Grant Contract with the Hugo Fire Department for Wildfire Equipment and Training Agenda HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HUGO CITY HALL MONDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2022 – 7 P.M. H. AWARD OF BID 1. None Scheduled I. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Birch Tree Ponds Improvement Project J. UNFINISHED BUSINESS 1. None Scheduled K. NEW BUSINESS 1. Rosemary Place Sketch Plan L. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS 1. None Scheduled M. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS 1. None Scheduled N. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS 1. None Scheduled O. ADJOURNMENT BACKGROUND MEMO FOR THE HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING MONDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2022 D.1 Minutes for the November 4, 2022, Kevin Magnuson Meet and Greet D.2 Minutes for the November 7, 2022, City Council Meeting D.3 Minutes for the November 14, 2022, Commissioner Interviews D.4 Minutes for the November 15, 2022, Board of Canvass Staff recommends Council approve the above meeting minutes as presented. F.1 Lakes Center for Youth & Families – Executive Director Linda Madsen Executive Director Linda Madsen will present to Council information on the Lakes Center for Youth and Families. G.1 Approve Claims Roster Staff recommends Council approve the Claims Roster as presented. G.2 Approve Annual Performance Review for Accounting Clerk Amber Lozier Amber Lozier was hired as the Finance and Public Works Administrative Assistant on October 8, 2018. On November 15, 2022, Amber was promoted to Accounting Clerk. Finance Director Anna Wobse recommends Council approved the Annual Performance Review for Amber Lozier G.3 Approve Hiring of Tom Robinson, Cory Albertson, and Jennifer Verpaletse as Probationary Hugo Firefighters. The Hugo Fire Department recently completed their fall 2022 hiring process and have three applicants that successfully completed all phases of their hiring process. Staff recommends the hiring of Tom Robinson, Cory Albertson, Jennifer Verpaletse as position of Probationary Fire Fighters for the Hugo Fire Department effective December 5, 2022. G.4 Approve Meredith St. Pierre as Chair of Parks Commission At the meeting of October 3, 2022, Council approved the resignation of Roger Clarke from the Hugo Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission. Clarke was serving as Chair. At the Parks Commission meeting of October 19, 2022, the Commission discussed the vacancy. Commissioner Meredith St. Pierre stated an interest in serving as Chair and the Parks Commission favorably discussed St. Pierre’s appointment. Staff recommends appointment of Meredith St. Pierre as Chair of the Parks, Recreation, and Open Space Commission G.5 Approve Michael Kelly and Mike Granger as New Planning Commission Members On November 14, 2022, Council interviewed ten interested candidates to fill vacancies on the City’s commissions. To fill the Planning Commissioner vacancies, staff recommends Council approve the appointment of Michael Kelly to a term that will expire on December 31, 2024, and the appointment of Mike Granger to a term that will expire on December 31, 2026. G.6 Approve Valerie Boyd as New Parks Commissioner On November 14, 2022, Council interviewed ten interested candidates to fill vacancies on the City’s commissions. To fill the Parks Commissioner vacancy, staff recommends Council approve the appointment of Valerie Boyd to a term that will expire on December 31, 2024. G.7 Approve Jim Compton as New Parks Commissioner Alternate Member On November 14, 2022, Council interviewed ten interested candidates to fill vacancies on the City’s commissions. To fill the Parks Commissioner Alternate Member vacancy, staff recommends Council approve the appointment of Jim Compton, Sr. to a term that will expire on December 31, 2023. G.8 Approve Donation from the Hugo American Legion to the Hugo Fire Department The Hugo American Legion is requesting to donate $1,000 to the Hugo Fire Department from pull-tab proceeds for equipment and training. All donations to the Fire Department must be approved by the Council. Staff recommends Council approve the donation of $1,000 to the Hugo Fire Department. G.9 Approve Site Plan, CUP Renewal, Variance, and Easement Vacation for Xcel Energy- 13620 Fenway Boulevard N. The applicant, Xcel Energy, is requesting approval of a site plan to construct a two-story approximately 32,000 square foot building as well as an outdoor training facility. The outdoor training facility will be an expansion of the existing facility on site, which is allowed by a conditional use permit. The applicant is requesting an amendment to their conditional use permit (CUP) to allow for the expanded facility. A variance is being requested to allow for the height of structures (poles and lattice tower) within the training facility, which exceed the maximum 50 feet allowed by ordinance. Since the applicant is proposing to impact a wetland on site located within a drainage and utility easement, they are requesting an easement vacation. At its November 10, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the request. No one from the public spoke. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the applications. Staff is recommending Council approve the Site Plan, CUP Amendment, Variance, and Easement Vacation applications for Xcel Energy on property located at 13620 Fenway Boulevard North. G.10 Approve Wetland Replacement Plan for Xcel Enery-13620 Fenway Boulevard N. Xcel Energy is proposing to expand their existing outdoor training facility and build an approximately 35,000 square foot training building. The property has .39 acres of farmed type 2 wetlands on site. The development will result in .39 acres of wetland impact, mostly because of grading for stormwater pond construction. The applicant is proposing to replace the impacts to the wetland basin though the purchase of wetland credits from an approved wetland bank. Staff recommend Council approve the wetland replacement plan, subject to final Technical Evaluation Panel issuance of the Notice of Decision for the wetland replacement application and conditions. G.11 Approve State of Minnesota Grant Contract with the Hugo Fire Department for Wildfire Equipment and Training The MN DNR is in need of local fire department assistance in suppressing wildland fires. The Commissioner of Natural Resources has made grants available for the procurement of fire suppression equipment and training of fire departments in techniques of fire control. A local match of 50-50 is required for this grant. Staff recommends Council approve the grant contract with the State of Minnesota in the amount of $5,000 for equipment and training in fighting wildfires. I.1 Public Hearing on Birch Tree Ponds Improvement Project On July 5, 2022, City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility study for 2023 Birch Tree Ponds Area Street Improvements. City Council accepted the competed study at the October 17, 2022, City Council meeting and called for a Public Hearing to be held on November 21, 2022. The 2023 Birch Tree Ponds Area Street Improvements consists of partial roadway reconstruction, mill and overlay improvements, and spot curb and gutter replacement as conditions warrant within the Birch Tree Ponds area designated for improvement. Total project costs are estimated to be $2,113,700 with $672,900 coming from assessments. Staff will detail the proposed improvements and findings of the feasibility study with a PowerPoint presentation for the public hearing. Staff recommends Council hold the public hearing and approve the resolution ordering the project and authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the 2023 Birch Tree Ponds Area Street Improvements. K.1 Rosemary Place Sketch Plan The applicant, Summit Management LLC, is proposing to construct a 90-unit apartment complex on the west side of a 12.96-acre property, of which 7.75 acres are buildable. The property is located to the south of Rosemary Way N and north of Frenchman Road/CSAH 8, west of Festival Foods. The property is bisected diagonally by a 50-foot wide utility transmission line easement. The applicant is requesting review and comments on a sketch plan for development of the property with an apartment use, where current zoning and land use is commercial. A sketch plan is a way for an applicant to get feedback and unbinding comments on the plan, prior to formal submittal for approval. The applicant has received comments from the Planning Commission on November 10, 2022 and from the EDA on October 18, 2022. Staff is requesting that the City Council provide comments to the applicant regarding the potential change in zoning and land use designations, the use of the non-buildable portion of property, and the overall site design. O. Adjournment COUNCIL PRESENT: Klein, Miron, Petryk, Weidt COUNCIL ABSENT: Strub The Council gathered at the Miron Farm, 15250 Homestead Avenue North, to meet with Washington County District Attorney Kevin Magnuson. The meeting ended at approximately 8 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Michele Lindau City Clerk Minutes HUGO CITY COUNCIL COUNTY ATTORNEY MEET AND GREET HUGO CITY HALL FRIDAY, NOVEMBER 4, 2022 – 5:00 P.M. Call to Order Mayor Weidt called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. COUNCIL PRESENT: Klein, Miron, Petryk, Strub, Weidt COUNCIL ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT: City Administrator Bryan Bear, City Engineer Mark Erichson, City Attorney Dave Snyder, Community Development Director Rachel Juba, City Clerk Michele Lindau Minutes for October 17, 2022, Council Meeting Klein made motion, Petryk seconded, to approve the minutes for the City Council meeting held on October 17, 2022, as presented. All Ayes. Motion carried. Approval of Agenda Weidt made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the agenda as presented. All Ayes. Motion carried Hugo Lions Club Donation to the Washington County Dive Team Jason Schweiger from the Hugo Lions Club talked about annual Ribfest the Club held in September. Donation were collected for the Washington County Dive Team. Jason spoke briefly about the families affected. Jason said Ribfest was a success in spite of the bad weather. He thanked the Council for their ongoing support of the Lions Club. The Lions presented a check in the amount of $5,050 to the Dive Team. Mayor Weidt said the Council appreciates what the Lions do and the events they sponsor. He said he looks forward to a continued partnership. Washington County Sheriff Dan Starry thanked the Lions for holding the event. Starry said the Dive Team plays a crucial role that serves the function of bringing closure to families as quickly as possible. The dive team is not highlighted enough and Starry talked about Jim Anderson, a Dive Team member who had been there since 1996. Jim had worked at the 35W bridge collapse and had volunteer over 2,000 hours to the County. Starry said he was grateful to the Lions Club because the money will go to good use for equipment for the Dive Team, and he thanked the Council for their support. The Mayor called for a short break. The meeting reconvened at 7:17 p.m. Minutes HUGO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HUGO CITY HALL MONDAY, NOVEMBER 7, 2022 – 7 P.M. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for November 7, 2022 Page 2 of 5 Approval of Consent Agenda Miron made motion, Klein seconded, to approve the following Consent Agenda: 1. Approve Claims Roster 2. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Kraig Pettee 3. Approve Snowmobile Trail Applications for Hugo Snowmobile Club and Rice Creek Trail Association 4. Approve Renewal of Auto Dismantling License for Hugo Auto and Truck Parts 5. Approve Resolution Approving Variance for Accessory Building at 12776 Goodview Ave. N. - Wolfe 6. Approve Pay Request No. 2 to for the 2022 Oneka Parkway Improvement Project 7. Approve Pay Request No. 7 for the 2021 Downtown Improvement/Lions Park Project 8. Approve Release of the Letter of Credit for DR Horton for Clearwater Cove 4th Addition 9. Approve Rezoning Ordinance and Resolutions Approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Site Plan, Conditional Use Permits, Variance, and Minor Subdivision for Hugo Estates 10. Approve Purchase Agreement for 15230 Greene Ave. N. (Bruce Bernin Trust) 11. Approve Quote from Arnt Construction for Demolition of Buildings at 6540 Greene Ave. N. (Bernin Property) 12. Approve Purchase of New Brush Truck for the Hugo Fire Department All Ayes. Motion carried. Approve Claims Roster Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Claims Roster as presented. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Kraig Pettee Kraig Pettee was hired as a Public Works Worker starting November 12, 2018. Kraig had worked the three previous summers as a seasonal worker. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the annual performance review of Public Works Worker Kraig Pettee. Approve Snowmobile Trail Applications for Hugo Snowmobile Club and Rice Creek Trail Association The Hugo Snowmobile Club and the Rice Creek Trail Association had submitted their respective Snowmobile Trail Applications for the 2022-2023 snow season. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Snowmobile Trail Applications for the Hugo Snowmobile Club and the Rice Creek Trail Association. Approve Renewal of Auto Dismantling License for Hugo Auto and Truck Parts The City of Hugo received an application for the bi-annual Auto Dismantling License for Mike Brandt, dba Auto and Truck Parts. As a requirement of the license, City staff conducts annual Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for November 7, 2022 Page 3 of 5 inspection of the auto dismantling company for compliance with city, county, and state code. On October 31, 2022. Hugo City staff completed the inspection and found it to be in compliance with City Code as well as County regulations. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the biannual Auto Dismantling License for Hugo Auto & Truck Parts. Approve Resolution Approving Variance for Accessory Building at 12776 Goodview Ave. N. - Wolfe Susan E. Wolfe, 12776 Goodview Avenue North, had requested a variance to construct a 1,500 square foot accessory building for the storage of vehicles. The requested variance is to allow for the accessory building to be placed in front of the principal building relative to the street. The Board of Zoning held a public hearing on October 27, 2022, and unanimously recommended approval. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved RESOLUTION 2022-70 APPROVING A VARIANCE FROM THE ACCESSORY BUILDING PLACEMENT REQUIREMENT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 12776 GOODVIEW AVENUE NORTH. Approve Pay Request No. 2 to for the 2022 Oneka Parkway Improvement Project North Valley, Inc. had submitted Pay Request No. 2 in the amount of $1,005,382.63 for work certified through October 21, 2022, on the Oneka Parkway Project. Substantial completion had occurred on all phases of the project. Punch-list items and signal work at Frenchman Road/Oneka Parkway remained. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved payment to North Valley, Inc. in the amount of $1,005,382.63. Approve Pay Request No. 7 for the 2021 Downtown Improvement/Lions Park Project Peterson Companies, Inc. had submitted Pay Request No.7 in the amount of $351,149.10 for work certified through October 31, 2022, on the 2021 Downtown Improvement/Lions Park Project. Substantial work had been completed on the project. The contractor needed to install the playground fence to make the project complete and finish punch-list items. This pay request was inclusive of all project change orders for the duration of the project for both the downtown street improvements and Lions Park projects. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved payment to Peterson Companies, Inc. in the amount of $351,149.10. Approve Release of the Letter of Credit for DR Horton for Clearwater Cove 4th Addition DR Horton, developer, had requested the City release their letter of credit for the Clearwater Cove 4th Addition Development. City staff had inspected the work and the warranty period had expired. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the release of the letter of credit being held for the constructed improvements in the Clearwater Cove 4th Addition Development. Approve Rezoning Ordinance and Resolutions Approving Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Site Plan, Conditional Use Permits, Variance, and Minor Subdivision for Hugo Estates The TPP, LLC, c/o Summit Management, LLC, had requested approval of a comprehensive plan amendment, rezoning, site plan, and conditional use permits for a three story approximately 60,000 square foot apartment building and expansion of the manufactured home community with 16 Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for November 7, 2022 Page 4 of 5 additional homes for the property. The applicant had also requested a variance to allow the apartment building to be 39 feet in height, where 35 feet is allowed by the ordinance, in addition to approval of a subdivision of the property to have the apartments on a separate parcel. The common driveways and facilities would have a shared access and use agreement for all of the parcels. The property is 7 acres with no wetlands on site. The overall density of the project would be ten units per acre, meeting the proposed zoning district regulations. At its October 27, 2022, meeting the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the request. The applicant and two residents spoke during the public hearing. There were some questions about drainage, tree preservation and trespassing. The Planning Commission agreed that the proposed project was a good use of the property and fit in with the surrounding area. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the applications to the City Council, subject to all conditions listed in the resolutions. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved ORDINANCE 2022 – 517 AMENDING CHAPTER 90 (ZONING ORDINANCE) OF THE CITY CODE TO CLASSIFY CERTAIN LANDS LOCATED EAST OF HIGHWAY 61 AND SOUTH OF 152ND STREET NORTH, and RESOLUTION 2022-71 APPROVING A COMPRHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CHANGING MAP 3-1, 2040 LAND USE PLAN, and RESOLUTION 2022-72 APPROVING FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REZONING TPP. LLC c/o SUMMIT MANAGEMENT, LLC FOR PROPERTY LOCATED SOUTH OF 152ND STREET AND EAST OF HIGHWAY 61, and RESOLUTION 2022-73 APPROVING A SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS FOR TPP, LLC, C/O SUMMIT MANAGEMENT, LLC, FOR AN APARTMENT BUILDING AND EXPANSION OF THE HUGO ESTATES MANUFACTURED HOME COMMUNITY ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF HIGHWAY 61 AND SOUTH OF 152ND STREET NORTH, and RESOLUTION 2022-74 APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR TPP, LLC, C/O SUMMIT MANAGEMENT, LLC, FOR AN APARTMENT BUILDING ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF HIGHWAY 61 AND SOUTH OF 152ND STREET NORTH, and RESOLUTION 2022-75 APPROVING A MINOR SUBDIVISION FOR TPP, LLC, C/O SUMMIT MANAGEMENT, LLC, ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED EAST OF HIGHWAY 61 AND SOUTH OF 152ND STREET NORTH. Approve Purchase Agreement for 15230 Greene Ave. N. (Bruce Bernin Trust) At their meeting of October 19, 2022, the Parks Commission discussed the purchase of a .46-acre property located at 15320 Greene Avenue North. The property was currently owned by the Bruce A Bernin Trust and was recently listed for sale. It is located immediately south of the City-owned future park property on Greene Avenue that was previously purchased approximately 20 years ago and leased back to the Bernins. The .46-acre residential lot would allow for flexibility in locating the park entrance, ease of utility connections, and a better buffer between the park and the residential neighborhood. The Parks Commission recommend purchase of property through the Special Park Fund. It was discussed that if it was not possible to incorporate the property into the master plan of the future park, the residential lot could be sold in the future. Staff worked on an offer and presented it to the seller, which was accepted. Staff had signed the purchase agreement contingent on City Council approval. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the purchase agreement for the property located at 15320 Greene Avenue North with a purchase price of $145,000. Hugo City Council Meeting Minutes for November 7, 2022 Page 5 of 5 Approve Quote from Arnt Construction for Demolition of Buildings at 6540 Greene Ave. N. (Bernin Property) Staff had received quotes from four contractors for the demolition of the buildings located at 6540 Greene Avenue North. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved a contract in the amount of $62,500.00 with Arnt Construction for the demolition work at 6540 Green Avenue North.. Approve Purchase of New Brush Truck for the Hugo Fire Department Included in the City’s 2023 budget was funding for the purchase of a new brush truck for the Fire Department. This would replace a 1997 Jeep Wrangler. Due to the current market conditions and shortage of parts worldwide, the department had been advised by Midway Ford that this vehicle could take 6 to 8 months or even longer to receive after order. Therefore, Fire Chief Jim Compton had requested approval now in order to ensure it could be received in a timely manner in 2023. The cost of this vehicle was as expected, and staff had budgeted in the capital improvement plan appropriately for the replacement. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the ordering of a 2023 Ford F350 Super Duty from Midway Ford Commercial Fleet and Government Sales. Reminder - General Election on Tuesday, November 8, 2022 City Administrator Bryan Bear reminded Council the General Election would be held on Tuesday, November 8, 2022. Polls would be open from 7 a.m. to 8 p.m. Information on voting could be found on the MN Secretary of State website, the City of Hugo website, or by calling City Hall. Reminder and Schedule Time for Commissioner Interviews on Monday, November 14, 2022 City Administrator Bryan Bear reminded Council commissioner interviews were scheduled for Monday, November 14, 2022. There were ten applicants. Staff had prepared a schedule for Council with a starting time of 5 p.m. Reminder and Schedule Tim – Board of Canvassing on Tuesday, November 15, 2022 City Administrator Bryan Bear reminded Council the Board of Canvas was scheduled to meet on Tuesday, November 15, 2023, at 5 p.m. in the Council Chambers for the purpose of certifying the 2022 election results. Adjournment Klein made motion, Petryk seconded, to adjourn at 7:23 p.m. All Ayes. Motion carried. Respectfully Submitted, Michele Lindau City Clerk COUNCIL PRESENT: Klein, Miron, Petryk, Strub, Weidt COUNCIL ABSENT: None OTHERS PRESENT AT CITY HALL: City Administrator Bryan Bear, Administrative Intern Joseph Hinzman The Council held interviews to fill vacancies on the planning and parks commissions. Those interviewed at City Hall were: Angie Fitzgerald, Cassandra Birkeland, Jim Compton, Melanie Wettstein, Michael Granger Jr, Michael Kelly, Mitch Traczyk, Rachel McAulay, Savannah Vans-Mail, and Valerie Boyd. Council will make official appointments at their next regular meeting on November 21, 2022. The meeting adjourned at 9:20 p.m. Respectfully Submitted, Bryan J. Bear City Administrator Minutes HUGO CITY COUNCIL COMMISSION INTERVIEWS HUGO CITY HALL MONDAY, NOVEMBER 14, 2022 – 5:00 P.M. Weidt called the meeting to order at 5:00 p.m. PRESENT Klein, Miron, Petryk, Strub, Weidt ABSENT: None STAFF PRESENT: City Administrator Bryan Bear and City Clerk Michele Lindau The Board of Canvass was held to allow Council to canvass the election results for the 2022 Municipal Election held on November 8, 2022. The results were as follows: MAYOR Tom Weidt 4,026 Jimmie Gregoire David Michaelson Write-Ins 2,052 684 68 COUNCIL WARD 1 Becky Petryk 1,969 Write-ins 30 COUNCIL WARD 3 David Strub 1,433 Write-ins 18 Petryk made motion, Klein seconded, to approve RESOLUTION 2022-76 CANVASSING YEAR 2022 ELECTION RESULTS. All ayes. Motion carried Strub made motion, Miron seconded, to adjourn at 5:17 p.m. All Ayes. Motion carried. Respectfully Submitted, Michele Lindau City Clerk Minutes BOARD OF CANVASS MEETING HUGO CITY HALL TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 15, 2022 – 5 P.M. Chief Compton; We have recently completed our fall 2022 hiring process and we have three applicants that have successfully completed all phases of our hiring process. I recommend to you and the Hugo City Council that we approve: Tom Robinson Cory Albertson Jennifer Verpaletse For the position of Probationary Fire Fighter for the City of Hugo, MN effective December 5, 2022. Respectfully; Colin Emans Assistant Chief Hugo Fire Department City of Hugo Fire Department 5323 140th Street North Hugo, Minnesota 55038 PH: (651) 762-6362 FAX: (651) 429-3212 Hugo City Council, I would like to express my interest in the Parks and Recreation Commission Chair that was recently vacated. I believe I am an ideal candidate for this opening and my fellow Commissioners agreed and encouraged me to express my interest in this position. I believe this position offers me an excellent opportunity to give back in a unique way to my community and to use my experience to help Hugo continue to maintain and improve our parks, trails, and recreation programming. I have had the opportunity to work in professional sports, higher education, and nonprofits. I have extensive experience in fundraising, volunteer management, and event production. It is this unique work history that I believe makes me well suited for the Chair position. I enjoy spending my free time outdoors – fishing, hunting, hiking and photographing nature. I cherish the time I’ve spent exploring the wilds of Minnesota and beyond; from watching a moose calf swim across a lake to identifying wildflowers along the trail, or the power I felt paddling a canoe against the wind, all helped to make me who I am today. I have enjoyed my first year on the Parks Commission and learning more about the City of Hugo and our neighborhood parks system. I would appreciate the opportunity to deepen this connection while serving as the Chair of the Parks Commission. Meredith St Pierre Agenda Number: G.9 CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Max Gort, Associate Planner, through Rachel Juba, Community Development Director SUBJECT: Xcel Energy – Site Plan, CUP Amendment, Variance, and Easement Vacation for site located at 13620 Fenway Boulevard North DATE: November 17, 2022, for the City Council meeting of November 21, 2022 ZONING: Business Park (BP) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Business Park (BP) 120-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: December 23, 2022 1. PLANNING COMMISSION UPDATE: At its November 10, 2022, meeting the Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the request. No one spoke at the public hearing. The issues raised by the Commissioners were related to the transmission lines and the anticipated traffic. Members of the applicant’s development team were in attendance and addressed the Commission’s questions. They stated that only one of the proposed training transmission lines would reach a height of 105 feet, and that the majority of the utility poles would vary in height between 45 and 75 feet. One commissioner asked about the number of employees who would be permanently working at the facility, versus the number of employees who will be cycling through training processes. The applicants stated that 15-20 permanent employees will be working there, with up to 200 coming in for training events. The Planning Commission was generally comfortable with the expansion to the existing training center and liked the idea of visitors coming to Hugo to attend training events at the facility. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Site Plan, CUP Amendment, Variance, and Easement Vacation applications for Xcel Energy on the site located at 13620 Fenway Boulevard North, subject to the conditions in the resolutions. Xcel Energy Page 2 2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant, Xcel Energy, is requesting approval of a site plan to construct a two -story approximately 32,000 square foot building as well as an outdoor training facility. The outdoor training facility will be an expansion of the existing facility on site, which is allowed by a conditional use permit. The applicant is requesting an amendment to their conditional use permit (CUP) to allow for the expanded facility. A variance is being requested to allow for the height of structures (poles and lattice tower) within the training facility, which exceed the maximum 50 feet allowed by ordinance. Since the applicant is proposing to impact a wetland on site located within a drainage and utility easement, they are requesting an easement vacation. 3. CONTEXT: A. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The surrounding properties to the north, west, and south are zoned Business Park (BP) and Large Lot Single-Family Residential (R-1), although the singular property zoned R-1 is occupied by Clearwater Creek Preserve, a passive park, rather than residential use. The properties to the east are zoned General Industrial (I-3) and are occupied by industrial uses. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides the properties to the north, west, and south for Business Park (BP) and Public/Quasi- Public (PQ) use, and the properties to the east are guided for Industrial (IND) use. B. Existing Site Characteristics The property is roughly 28 acres in size. The site has some sloping terrain, with upland areas and a slope downward toward the west. The southern half of the site, approximately 12.5 acres, is occupied by two existing buildings and outdoor training area. There are wetlands on the portion of property where the new construction is to take place. 4. BACKGROUND: There is a training facility owned and operated by Xcel Energy on property within the Bald Eagle Industrial Park. The original site plan and CUP were reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council in 2012, amended in 2017 to allow for a 12,000 square foot building addition, and again in 2021 to construct additional training facilities. A variance was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council to allow for the construction of training transmission poles which were higher than the 50-foot maximum height allowed by ordinance. The applicant is proposing to construct multiple new training facilities at the property they have named Hugo Training Center (HTC). The outdoor facilities are an extension of outdoor training transmission lines as well as a new training substation. The transmission lines will feature 4 different lines, ranging in height from 43 feet to 105 feet. The training substation will simulate real life substations at 5 different voltages, and will be built on an approximately 1.65 -acre gravel pad with a galvanized steel perimeter fence. The new transmission lines and the substation will both be non-energized, minimizing hazards to both employees and surrounding properties. The applicant estimates that the project will be completed by the end of 2023. Xcel Energy Page 3 The second proposed project is a two-story, approximately 40,000 square foot building which will house relocated training activities that previously took place in Minneapolis, MN, which include laboratories and classrooms. The applicant is proposing a significant amount of employee traffic using the building during peak training event times. 5. ANALYSIS: A. Level of City Discretion in Decision-Making The City’s discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit amendment is limited to whether or not the proposed application meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the conditional use permit. The City’s discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has a higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards in the ordinance. B. Site Plan Building Setbacks The BP zoning district requires a minimum 30-foot front yard setback, a minimum 40-foot side yard setback, and a minimum 30-foot rear yard setback. The proposal meets all of these requirements Building Height The BP zoning district has a maximum building height of 50 feet. The proposed building is 38 feet in height and meets the ordinance standard. The applicant is proposing to construct training transmission lines which exceed the maximum building height, requiring a variance. A. VARIANCE FROM BUILDING HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS The applicant is proposing to construct the outdoor training transmission poles at var ying heights, with a maximum of 105 feet, where 50 feet is required by ordinance. Staff used the standards outlined in Section 90-38 of the City Code and found the following: (1) Law. The variance as requested is permissible by law. Xcel Energy Page 4 The proposed variance is permissible by law. (2) Practical Difficulties. The applicant for a variance shall establish that there are practical difficulties in complying with the provisions of the zoning regulations. The term “Practical Difficulties” as used in the granting of a variance means: a. Reasonable Use. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance and; By adding to the existing training facilities, the applicant is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner. The proposed transmission lines are similar to existing, operable transmission lines and utility poles located throughout the City. It is in staff’s opinion that allowing for the training transmission lines to be of similar height to existing energized utility poles is a reasonable use. b. Unique Circumstances. The plight of property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner and; The property is surrounded by mature wooded areas to the west and south, effectively screening the existing training facilities from adjacent land uses, specifically the residential uses to the south. The wooded areas and location of the proposed building would provide screening to the transmission lines that would not be possible if the transmission lines were placed in another location on the property. Additionally, the proposed transmission line consists of utility poles that are similar to existing live operational utility poles that are of similar heights. c. Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The property is zoned Business Park and is surrounded by other, existing industrial uses. Additionally, the property is buffered and screened from adjacent residential developments by existing wooded areas, as well as the screening provided by the proposed training building in front of the training poles relative to the road. It is in staff’s opinion that the requested variance will not alter the essential character of the surrounding business park area. Staff is of the opinion there are practical difficulties in meeting the ordinance standards constructing the new training transmission lines. (3) Spirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this chapter and with the policies of the City’s Comprehensive Plan. The spirit and intent of the ordinance restricting building height is to ensure that neighboring properties are not dominated by excessively tall structures, and that the essential character of the surrounding area is not disrupted. Due to the screening provided by mature wooded areas to the west and south, and the proposed training building on the east side of the property, the requested variance meets the spirit and intent of the ordinance. Xcel Energy Page 5 (4) Prohibited Use. The variance, if granted, shall not have the effect of allowing any use prohibited in the district. The training center is a permitted use in the Business Park zoning district. (5) Hazard Consideration. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood protection than required by this chapter. The variance shall be determined the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief, and the variance shall not be issued within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. The property is not located within a FEMA designated floodplain. (6) Septic and Well Compliance. The sewage treatment system and water system of the subject property is in compliance with city and state codes. The property is served by City sewer and water. It is in staff’s opinion that the application meets the criteria outlined in the City Code to approve a variance. Building Coverage and Lot Coverage The ordinance limits lot area to be covered by a building to 40% and lot area to be covered by impervious surface to 80%. The site plan meets the requirements. Landscaping Section 90-181 of the Zoning Ordinance provides landscaping requirements for developments. The site plan includes tree and shrub locations and species. The applicant is proposing 68 overstory deciduous trees, 18 coniferous trees, 15 ornamental trees, and 295 shrubs. The ordinance requires 36 ornamental trees for this site based on perimeter and building area, and the 15 provided ornamental trees do not meet this requirement. However, the ordinance does provide calculation for equivalent planting materials, allowing substitutions to be made for th e minimum landscape requirements. The applicant’s landscape plan provides for well over the required amount of overstory deciduous trees and shrubs, with the intent of providing screening to the outdoor training facilities. Staff is comfortable with the substitution on the minimum requirement for ornamental tree plantings with the proposed excess of deciduous trees and shrubs, and will provide this as a condition in the CUP amendment resolution. Lighting The ordinance requires lighting to consist of cut-off fixtures and for light cast on adjacent property and roads not to exceed ½ foot candle measured at the property line or 1 -foot candle measured at the street’s centerline. The ordinance also required the light fixtures, whether pole mounted or wall mounted to be cut-off fixtures. The applicant has not yet provided staff with a lighting plan, but has stated that any pole or wall-mounted lighting will be consistent with that of the existing facility on site. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to ensure that their lighting plan meets requirements. Xcel Energy Page 6 Fencing and Screening The applicant is proposing fencing around the proposed substation and transmission line and to the south portion of the building to prevent unauthorized access. The fencing around the substation is proposed to be 10 feet high, and constructed with a mixture of black wrought iron and black chain link, consistent with fencing around the rest of the site. Remaining screening will be provided with the mature wooded areas to the west and south of the property. Any exterior mechanical equipment for the building will need to be adequately screened with material consistent with the rest of the building design. The applicant has stated that mechanical equipment will either be located at ground level or the interior of the building, and that a screening plan will be submitted as the plans for mechanical equipment layout progresses. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to ensure that any exterior mechanical equipment will be adequately screened. Streets and Access The existing facilities on the property are adequately served with two access points onto Fenway Boulevard N. The applicant is proposing an additional access point to the north of the proposed new building, as well as a widening of the existing curb cut near the existing building to 33 feet. The proposed new and modified access points meet City Code requirements. Parking Per City Code the parking required for the building and facility is 186 parking stalled. The applicant has stated at the peak of training on the site more parking stalls may be needed. The plans show a total of 317 parking spaces. The applicant is proposed to construct 229 stalls and shows 110 parking stalls as deferred parking. The deferred parkin g would be constructed at any time deemed necessary by the City, if a parking problem occurs. The parking spaces meets the ordinance standard. Trails There is a City trail along Fenway Boulevard N. The applicant is not proposing to impact this trail or provide any additional trails. If the trail is impacted, the applicant will be responsible for replacement of the trail. Architecture, Building Material The applicant has provided floor plans, elevations, and renderings of the proposed building. The architecture of the building will be subject to the Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines adopted by the City in 2011. The guidelines encourage four-sided design with at least one change in wall planes and roof lines to provide depth. The applicant has proposed a mixture of concrete panels and wood-like metal materials to create a light and dark contrast across the facades of all four sides of the building. The applicant is at 25% for the metal material and will need to reduce it to 20% per the commercial and industrial design standards. In general, the applicant has done a good job meeting the intent of the commercial and industrial design guidelines. Staff has Xcel Energy Page 7 requested that the applicant provide material samples to ensure that the proposed metal building material, and that the color, texture, and design of the other building materials are attractive and aesthetically pleasing. Signage The applicant is proposing a wall sign to be placed on the front façade of the building. Sec. 90 - 265(h)(1)(a) restricts single-tenant wall signs to a maximum of 10 percent of the gross wall area of the front façade. The applicant will need to provide dimensions of the wall sign prior to issuance of a sign permit. The applicant has mentioned the possibility of constructin g one or more directional monument signs to assist in the direction of visitors attending training events. Staff will review these potential monument signs prior to the issuance of a sign permit. Drainage / Grading The applicant is proposing stormwater management through two infiltration basins, one located near the west property line and one located between the proposed building and substation. The stormwater ponds are proposed to be constructed in existing low-lying wetland areas, minimizing the need for additional grading. The proposed impervious surface is not shown to drain to the infiltration basins, and the applicant will need to provide treatment plans prior to future permitting. However, the applicant’s stormwater management plan generally meets the City’s water quality and rate control standards. Staff will continue to work with the applicant on addressing the technical comments related to their stormwater management plan prior to the issuance of a stormwater permit. Utilities The applicant plans to connect to city sewer and water stubs which are available for the northerly portion of the property. Wetlands The applicant is proposing to impact 0.39 acres of wetland, mitigated by the purchase of wetland credits. A wetland replacement plan application was received by the City on September 27, 2022, and has been reviewed by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP). The TEP is recommending approval of the wetland replacement plan for the site. Park Dedication Park dedication is not required for the proposed use. It is in staff’s opinion that the applicant has met all the necessary requirements to approve their site plan. 6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT: The applicant is proposing to expand outdoor storage with construction of new training transmission lines and a training substation. Since the area is expanding beyond the portion of Xcel Energy Page 8 the property covered by the original conditional use permit and subsequent amendments, a conditional use permit amendment is required. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to allow exterior storage larger than the principal building, provided that it is adequately screened from view of adjacent properties. The applicant is proposing to screen the outdoor facilities by way of existing mature wooded area, fencing, and the proposed approximately 35,000 square foot building on site. Staff is comfortable with the proposed location of the transmission lines and substation, and is of the opinion that they will be adequately screened. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies this property for Business Park (BP) use. The character of the surrounding area is industrial in nature. There are buffers of mature woodland and proposed landscaping that create separation between the site and nearby residential properties. It is in staff’s opinion that the proposed use will not alter the character of the surrounding area. Staff is of the opinion that the request meets all of the requirements to approve a conditional use permit amendment. 7. EASEMENT VACATION: The city maintains a drainage and utility easement for the delineated 0.39 acres of wetlands on site. The applicant is proposing to impact the wetlands for the construction of the new building, training facilities, and stormwater management infrastructure. Pending the approval of wetland replacement plan by the TEP, the wetlands will be filled and the City’s need for a drainage and utility easement will be eliminated. Staff is of the opinion that the applicant meets the requirements to approve an easement vacation, subject to approval by the TEP. 8. CONCLUSION: Staff finds that the proposal meets all the requirements necessary for the City to approve the site plan, CUP amendment, variance, and easement vacation as outlined in the City Code and zoning district regulations, subject to the conditions listed in the attached resolutions. 9. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the site plan, CUP amendment, variance, and easement vacation subject for Xcel Energy on the property located at 13620 Fenway Boulevard North. 10. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the Site Plan, CUP Amendment, Variance, and Easement Vacation applications for Xcel Energy on the site located at 13620 Fenway Boulevard North, subject to the conditions in the resolutions. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan Resolution Xcel Energy Page 9 3. CUP Resolution 4. Amended CUP 5. Variance Resolution 6. Easement Vacation Notice 7. Engineer’s Memo dated November 3, 2022 8. Applicants Narrative 9. Civil Plan Set dated August 5, 2022 10. Updated Site Plan dated November 7, 2022 11. Exterior Elevations Fenway Boulevard NorthF e n w a y B o u le v a r d C ir c le N o r t h Xcel Energy Training Center13620 Fenway Blvd. NLocation MapHugo, MN Parcel Boundary selection Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary ¯0 100Feet1 in = 250 feet Document Path: S:\Mapping\Emily\LocationSite Maps\2022\Xcel - 13620 Fenway Blvd N.mxdSite RESOLUTION 2022-XX APPROVING A SITE PLAN FOR XCEL ENERGY FOR A BUILDING AND OUTDOOR TRAINING FACILITIES ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13620 FENWAY BOULEVARD NORTH WHEREAS, Xcel Energy has requested approval of a site plan to allow construction of an approximately 35,000 square foot building and outdoor training facilities on the property located at 13620 Fenway Boulevard North and legally described as follows: See Attachment. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the site plan at a duly called a Public Hearing on November 10, 2022, and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Xcel Energy for a site plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. A site plan is approved for an approximately 35,000 square foot building and outdoor training facilities in accordance with the application received by the City on August 5, 2022 and November 7, 2022, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The site plan is subject to approval of a conditional use permit (Resolution #2022-XX) and variance (Resolutions # 2022-XX) 3. A sign permit is required for all signs. The sign permit application shall be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to installation. 1. The applicant will be responsible for maintaining stormwater facilities and vegetation proposed as a part of the project. A maintenance agreement between the City and the applicant shall be reviewed and approved by the City then recorded against the property prior to the start of grading activities on the site. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated to the City over the stormwater management facilities. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer must comply with the following conditions: a. The applicant shall comply with all conditions from the City Engineer’s memo dated November 3, 2022 b. The developer shall obtain all necessary local, state, and federal permits. c. The developer shall pay all fees as required in the fee schedule, subject to change each year. d. The applicant shall provide a plan for screening roof top or ground mounted mechanical equipment. Roof top mechanical equipment shall be screen with building materials consistent with the building. Resolution 2022-____ Page 2 of 3 Architecture a. The applicant shall submit building material and glass samples for review and approval by city staff. b. The percentage of metal covering the exterior of the building shall be 20 % or less. The architectural plans shall be reviewed and approved by staff. c. The internal roof drainage system that shall be integrated into the building design and shall be reviewed and approved by staff. d. The trash enclosure shall be included in the plans and shall be screened with materials consistent with the building material and shall be reviewed and approved by staff. Landscaping/lighting a. The developer shall show all areas that will be seeded, sodded, and irrigated on the landscape plan. b. The landscaping shall be irrigated to ensure establishment of plantings. c. The developer shall provide overstory deciduous trees and shrubs to substitute the minimum requirement of ornamental trees by City ordinance, in the respective amounts specified by the landscape plan dated August 5, 2022. d. The developer shall install temporary landscaping for the training area until the proposed building is constructed. Staff shall review and approve a temporary landscape plan. e. The lighting plan shall meet the standards in City Code Section 90-239 Lighting. f. The applicant shall submit cut sheets for the pole and wall mounted light fixtures to be reviewed and approved by staff. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the developer must comply with the following conditions: a. All exterior mechanical equipment must be screened from view of adjacent properties. Staff shall perform an inspection when equipment is installed to ensure compliance with City code. b. Any areas of the street, sidewalk, and trail connection that are disturbed with the construction shall be restored to the City’s satisfaction. c. All landscaping shall be installed per the plans approved by staff. Resolution 2022-____ Page 3 of 3 ADOPTED by the City Council this 21st day of November, 2022. _______________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2022-XX APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR XCEL ENERGY TO AMEND THE SITE PLAN FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13620 FENWAY BOULEVARD NORTH WHEREAS, Xcel Energy has requested approval of a conditional use permit amendment to amend the site plan for the property located at 13620 Fenway Boulevard North and is legally described as follows: (See Attached) WHEREAS, the site plan is in accordance with the variance to allow transmission training poles to be up to 105 feet in height, where 50 feet is required by ordinance. WHEREAS, a conditional use permit was approved on April 5, 2021, for a new transmission line for training. WHEREAS, it is the desire of the applicant to amend the conditional use permit approved on April 5, 2021, to revise the permit and to supersede all other prior conditional use permit approvals. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said conditional use permit amendment at a duly called public hearing on November 10, 2022, and recommends approval subject to the conditions listed in the conditional use permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the conditional use permit amendment for Xcel Energy on the property located at 13620 Fenway Boulevard North with the following findings: 1. The development shall comply with the revised site plan dated November 7, 2022. 2. The developer shall provide overstory deciduous trees and shrubs to substitute the minimum requirement of ornamental trees by City ordinance, in the respective amounts specified by the landscape plan dated August 5, 2022. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, exact locations of new facilities and final project plans shall be reviewed and approved by staff. 4. The developer shall comply with all items in the conditional use permit and it will be recorded at Washington County. ADOPTED by the City Council this 21st day of November, 2022. _______________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk CITY OF HUGO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DATE OF APPROVAL: November 21, 2022 OWNER: Xcel Energy Inc. 414 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55401 ADDRESS FOR WHICH CUP IS GRANTED: 13620 Fenway Boulevard North LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit A ZONING DISTRICT: Business Park (BP) THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWS FOR THE FOLLOWING: An exterior storage area and outdoor electric and gas training area. THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. The conditional use permit is hereby amended to include the site plan dated November 7, 2022 showing the location of the added transmission lines and substation for training. 2. The conditional use permit shall comply with the following conditions: a. The development shall comply with the comments in the Engineer’s memo dated December 1, 2011, May 15, 2012, October 29, 2012, and July 7, 2017, and November 3, 2022 b. The location and geometrics of the site plan shall be further reviewed and approved by City staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. c. All exterior storage shall be screened from view from adjacent properties and right of ways. Staff shall review and approve the fencing and landscape plan. d. Exterior storage of equipment shall be located on a paved surface. e. The design of the home simulators shall be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to installation. f. At any time the fumes from the outdoor gas training becomes a nuisance; Xcel shall take action to abate the issue. At anytime as requested by the City, Xcel agrees to notify the surrounding property owners of gas training. ______________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this _____ day of __________________, 2022, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Tom Weidt, Mayor of the City of Hugo, a Minnesota municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Hugo b y the authority of the City Council of the City of Hugo, and Tom Weidt, mayor, acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City of Hugo. __________________________________________ Notary Public Dated: _____________, 2022. ___________________________________ Title___________________ STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this ____ day of ___________, 2022, before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared _____________________, to me known as the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, who stated that they are the owners of the property this permit applies to, and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. ______________________________ Notary Public This document was drafted by: Hugo City Council 14669 Fitzgerald Ave N Hugo, MN 55038 This Conditional Use Permit supersedes any Permits for this use that were previously recorded. RESOLUTION 2022-XX APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR XCEL ENERGY, FOR TRAINING TRANSMISSION LINES ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13620 FENWAY BOULEVARD NORTH WHEREAS, Xcel Energy, has requested approval of a variance to allow the height of training transmission lines to be up to 105 feet, where 50 feet is required by ordinance on the property legally described as; See Attached WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said variance at a duly called a public hearing on November 10, 2022, and recommends approval subject to the findings listed in this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the variance for Xcel Energy, to allow training transmission lines to be up to 105 feet, where 50 feet is required by ordinance with the following findings: 1.The proposed variance is permissible by law. 2.The applicant is requesting to construct several non-energized transmission lines for training purposes that vary in height and reach up to 105 feet. 3.The applicant is requesting to use the property in a reasonable manner by constructing transmission lines of similar height to existing energized utility poles throughout the City. 4.The property is uniquely shaped and surrounded by mature wooded areas to the west and south, screening the facilities from adjacent land uses. The wooded areas and location of the proposed building would provide screening to the transmission lines. The need for a variance is due to unique circumstances. 5.The site surrounded by other business park uses and industrial uses. Additionally, the property is screened and buffered from nearby residential developments by existing wooded areas and the proposed training building, therefore the requested variance would not significantly alter the character of the surrounding area. 6.There are practical difficulties in meeting the zoning requirement. 7.The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to allow a certain building height without adversely impacting the character of established areas and ensuring the building is consistent with the surrounding development. The height of the transmission lines Resolution 2022-74 Page 2 will not adversely impact the character of the area and will be consistent with the surrounding development. The granting of the variance will keep with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 8.Outdoor training facilities are allowed in the Business Park (BP) district with approval of a conditional use permit. The applicant has applied for a conditional use permit. 9.The project does not proposed to impact the floodplain. 10.The property is served with municipal sewer and water. ADOPTED by the City Council this 21st day of November, 2022 _______________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: __________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF VACATION PROCEEDINGS FOR THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13620 FENWAY BOULEVARD NORTH PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City Council for the City of Hugo has, on the 21st day of November, 2022, completed the proceedings for the vacation of a portion of the Drainage and Utility Easement on the property legally described as follows: See Attached Dated this 21st day of November, 2022. ______________________________ Bryan Bear, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this ____ day of _____________, 2022, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared BRYAN BEAR, City Administrator of the City of Hugo, a Minnesota municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Hugo by the authority of the City Council of the City of Hugo, and BRYAN BEAR, City Administrator, acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City of Hugo. __________________________________________ Notary Public This Instrument was drafted by: City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Ave N Hugo, MN 55038 C:\Users\max.gort\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\AIOVOAHC\021146-000 LTR RJuba - Xcel Hugo Training Facility - Site Plan 110322 (002).docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM November 3, 2022 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Site Plan Review Xcel Hugo Training Facility WSB Project No. 021146-000 Dear Ms. Juba: We have reviewed the site plan submittal for the Xcel Hugo Training Facility site located west of Fenway Boulevard at the equivalent of 137th Street. In particular, we have reviewed the following plans related to this particular request: • Civil Plan Set (Xcel Hugo Training Facility Preliminary Plan - Revision 08-09-22.pdf) dated 8/9/22 by Loucks • Stormwater Management Plan (22 08-09 - SWMP.pdf) dated 8/9/22 by Loucks Based on the review of the above documents, we offer the following comments related to this application: Grading, Street, and Utility Plans 1. The site is proposed to have two accesses. The first is through one of their existing parking entrances on Fenway Boulevard while the second is an additional connection to Fenway Boulevard approximately 750 feet to the north. 2. Water service to the site will be achieved with connecting to an existing 8” water stub from Fenway Boulevard near the southeast corner of the site. New hydrants are proposed for the site however, the need for additional hydrants will be determined by the fire official. 3. Sanitary sewer service is available to the site from the existing 8” sanitary sewer service stub at the southeast corner of the lot that was constructed with the initial tr aining facility site. 4. 329 additional parking spaces are provided around the northern, eastern, and southern sides of the building. 5. Detailed redline comments have been provided on the plans and sent to the applicants engineer so they can be addressed in future submittals. Stormwater Management 6. Applicant is proposing to meet water quality requirements through onsite depressed areas providing infiltration however the majority of the impervious area onsite does not drain through these low-lying areas. Treatment needs to be provided and documented for permitting compliance where impervious is shown to drain to. Ms. Rachel Juba November 3, 2022 Page 2 7. Per RCWD Rule C.6.d.2 if infiltration is feasible onsite, onsite volume control through either infiltration or water reuse must be used to provide the required water quality volume. If it not feasible for infiltration to provide all of the required water quality volume and alternative BMPs are proposed to provide water quality volume, it must be documented why that is the case. It should be noted that the site appears to be located within a high vulnerability DWSMA which requires a higher level of engineering review for infiltration to confirm infiltration will not cause negative impacts on groundwater. 8. Rate control and freeboard requirements are shown to be met with the current design but should be confirmed once comments on water quality have been addressed. 9. Drainage and utility easement should be shown over the proposed stormwater management basins and access pathways to the basins. 10. A maintenance agreement will be required for the stormwater management facilities. 11. Water reuse on this site is not intended, nor practical given the site characteristics. 12. Stormwater plan and model comments have been provided to applicant and will need to be addressed in future submittals for documentation and permitting purposes. Wetland 13. 0.39 acres of wetland impacts are proposed with the project. A replacement plan application was submitted on September 27, 2022. Comments were received by the TEP and the applicant is currently working to address those comments. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. Additional comments may be necessary following the review of the responses to these. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463. Sincerely, WSB Mark Erichson, PE City Engineer cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative In 2012, the Xcel Energy Hugo Training Center building was designed, permitted, and constructed. The original plans for the site included several future training facility expansions and space to locate a future service center on the north half of the property. A 2017 project added a Gas Village training area west of the HTC building. In 2021, Xcel Energy sought to add outdoor non-energized transmission training lines along the western boundary of the property to address a need for improved linesman training facilities. A project was presented to and approved by the City of Hugo, but it was not constructed. After a thorough review of its training needs, company officials responsible for multiple areas of staff training wished to execute a more complete vision for the site. Staff were directed to create a full site plan. With this filing, Xcel Energy is proposing to construct multiple training operations at the HTC. The company’s vision would have the site become the host for most of the company’s staff training of gas, electrical and nuclear operators in their northern territories. The proposed site facilities and co-location of training staff will create operating efficiencies and provide new opportunities for training collaboration with other utilities’ staff and first responders from throughout the region. Site History -2012 Original Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit o Training Center was approved by City of Hugo in early 2012 which included three phases of a site plan for an approximate 50,000 square foot building and outdoor training facilities: Main building – classroom, labs, offices, conference room, etc. Indoor “electric barn” Indoor transmission training Outdoor training field: electric distribution pole array o Outdoor training field: gas Future Service Center: to be constructed on north parcel -2017 Revised Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit Amendment o Gas Village Training Facility: constructed on west side of property o Site plan included identifying a future building expansion of approximately 12,000 square feet for substation training. -2021 Revised Site Plan, and Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Height Variance Exemption o Approved by City of Hugo in Spring 2021, with 72-ft maximum structure height. o Transmission Line Training Facility – outdoor and non-energized o Project was put on hold by Xcel Energy in Summer/Fall 2021, in favor of a combined Substation and Transmission Line Training Facility – outdoor and non-energized. Site Plans - Present and Future Since this site was first planned, designed and constructed 10 years ago, the Xcel Energy training department and its needs have evolved. Safety is a core value at Xcel Energy, and the development of high-quality training facilities for our employees has been prioritized. Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative By centralizing our training operations and dedicating the entire HTC property to support training activities, our company can expand and improve an already industry-leading training facility. When completed, the site will provide capabilities to train not only Xcel Energy employees and contractors of varying utilities disciplines, but also staff from other utilities and municipality emergency services. HTC will host coordinated multi-organization emergency response exercises and other training that is necessary. It is important to note that while the company’s needs for a high-quality, centralized training facility are at the forefront, our long-term plans still include the possibility of locating a new service center in the northeast metro in the years ahead. We will continue to search for suitable sites for this purpose. Proposed Project 1 of 2: Transmission Lines and Substation Outdoor Training Facility In early-April 2021, the City of Hugo approved a Conditional Use Permit, a site plan amendment and a height variance for a non-energized outdoor transmission line only training facility. While this project was being reviewed by the City, Xcel Energy’s training department was going through a reorganization process to better align company training procedures and strategies. The project team determined the best option was to pause the approved transmission line only project to provide time for reassessing the master plan for the site. This pause, along with the evolution of the training department, allowed for a complete redesign of the approved transmission line project. The redesign increases the number of lines, relocates them to a more suitable location on the property, and includes a non-energized outdoor substation. This new design will greatly increase the training effectiveness of these facilities as it fully replicates real- world conditions with transmission lines, a substation, and the interactions between the two facilities. The design will consist of 4 different lines at 3 different voltages (1 @ 69kV, 2 @ 115kV, 1 @ 345kV) totally approximately 25 different pole type transmission line structures with a height range of approximately 43’ to 105’. The substation will be an approximately 1.65-acre class-5 gravel pad, enclosed by a 10’ chain link galvanized steel perimeter fence. This facility is designed to simulate a 345kv, 115kv, 69kv, 35kv and 15kv substations. From a training perspective, this is far superior to the previously submitted project design. Benefits for constructing the new facilities on the north half of the HTC site: Offers a centralized training center with convenient access to the adjacent indoor training center building that offers classrooms, restrooms, and protection during inclement weather. Connecting the Substation and Transmission Line outdoor yards together would create a “real life scenario” training yard that could provide more teaching opportunities about safety. If a smaller site was selected, the substation and transmission lines may need to be constructed separately (i.e. not connected) and perhaps on different sites. Any alternative site would likely not have the convenience of adjacent classrooms, restrooms, and storm shelters that the HTC site currently offers. Wide open areas without obstacles allow for increased safety while maneuvering larger equipment around transmission line structures for training exercises. Adequate space to host larger groups of both Xcel Energy and foreign utility (non-Xcel Energy) crews for training purposes. This larger yard could host a “lineman rodeo”, which is a competitive Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative training event where approximately 4-groups of 15-20 people per group (up to 100-150 people total) would simultaneously cycle through different stations to train on various real-life scenarios. Avoid physical interference with building near the existing “school of dirt” and the “gas extinguishing pit” training areas, both located in the southwest corner of the Hugo training center site, where the previous transmission line only project was originally proposed in 2021. Potential to host training exercises for contractors, other utility companies, and various governmental emergency services. Expected Employee Use: Approximately 90employees in Transmission Line Operations, including Supervisors. Approximately 100 employees in Substation Construction. 4-weeks for Journeyman training, 2-4 weeks for other miscellaneous training, training groups consisting of 20-30 employees. Employees operating throughout our business footprint would spend multiple days training at the facility, with many requiring meals and lodging. Estimated Schedule (Project 1 of 2): Design and Permitting: Summer-Fall 2022 Grading: Spring 2023 Transmission Line Construction: Summer-Fall 2023 (TBD crew availability and material lead times) Substation Construction: Summer-Fall 2023 (TBD crew availability and material lead times) Completed by end 2023 Proposed Project 2 of 2: Centralized In-Processing (CIP) Building Project We propose to construct a separate two-story building of approximately 30,000-40,000 square feet. The new building will allow us to centralize nuclear staff training operations that presently occur at Monticello and Prairie Island facilities; relocate training activities that presently occur at our Minneapolis Riverside Training Center (RTC); and host other training and events that our business operations may occasionally require. As part of their normal schedule of operations, our nuclear plants are taken off-line for refueling, training and maintenance periods. The CIP building will serve a critical role in supporting these planned plant outages. Currently, In-processing for employees and contractors that support nuclear maintenance outages is provided at the individual sites, but the configuration of facilities at the sites aren’t efficient. Outages typically require an additional 800 staff and contractors from throughout our business and from around the country to surge onto the site for a work period. These workers must be processed and trained before they can begin their work. In-processing is required for all types of contractor trades: electricians, pipefitters, steelworkers, plumbers, HVAC, etc.). Presently, for each outage, temporary offices, classroom trailers and other equipment is moved on-site to facilitate maintenance activities. Also, during outage operations, training for site personnel must be suspended to free up classroom space. The project provides us with opportunities to improve efficiencies and significantly lower operating costs. Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative In addition to improving In-Processing operations, our training personnel see the opportunity to relocate training operations now hosted at the Riverside Training Center (RTC), which is over 90 years old. This will allow us to centralize Xcel Energy Technical Training staff in Hugo, creating operating efficiencies and improving the sharing of resources across our training programs. The project includes construction of virtual training classrooms, to lower training costs as well as provide needed space to train the workforce of the future in Renewable Energy technologies. Expected employee use: Up to 225 employees during peak times (contractors and staff) over 6-weeks in Spring and Fall. 65-150 per day during off peak times. Estimated Schedule (Project 2 of 2): Design & Permitting: Summer-Fall 2023 Construction: 2024-2026 Requested City Actions: Site Plan Approval The applicant is requesting site plan approval for the above mentioned project. Plans have been included in support of the application and its consistency with the existing Business Park Zoning District can be summarized as follows: Building Setbacks: Proposed Front Setback=111 feet from Fenway Boulevard. Proposed Rear Setback=752 feet from westerly property line. Proposed Side Setback=231 feet from northerly property line. The proposal exceeds the required 30-foot front and rear setback and side yard setback equal to the height of the building, in no case less than 10 feet. Additional setback has been provided by the Owner to allow for greater screening to support the variance request. Building Coverage and Lot Coverage: Proposed Building Area=5.7%. Proposed Impervious Area=41.9% The proposal meets the maximum lot are a cover by a building of 40% and lot area to be covered by impervious surface of 80%. Landscape: The required landscape requirements for this project were calculated using either the perimeter of the site or the building square footage. Quantities have been included for whichever calculation is greater. Based on these calculation the following landscaping is required: Required overstory deciduous trees=47 Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative Required coniferous trees=36 Required ornamental trees = 36 Required shrubs=235 Xcel is proposing the following landscaping as part of this project: Provided overstory deciduous trees=185 Provided coniferous trees=36 Provided ornamental trees = 15 Provided shrubs=441 The proposed landscape meets or exceeds the requirements of Section 90-181 for required landscaping except for the ornamental tree count. More overstory deciduous trees are proposed than required to provide better screening. The groundcover is proposed to be a mix of native grasses around the stormwater facilities, low mow turf grass around the training areas, and sod and stone mulches around the building and parking lots. The native grasses and low mow turf is designed to reduce weekly maintenance, provide pollinator habitats, reduce irrigation requirements, and reduce the need for fertilizer and pesticides. Lighting: A lighting plan hasn’t been developed yet for this project. The proposed lighting will comply with the requirements of cut-off fixtures and for light cast on adjacent property and roads not exceed ½ foot candle measured at the property line or 1 foot candle measured at the street’s centerline. Previous applications from Xcel have proposed LED lights for pole and wall mounted fixtures. Lighting plans and photometric providing more detail for the pole locations and fixture types will be provided to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Lighting in the substation training area is also proposed. These lights would be mounted to the substation equipment and only be used when needed for training events. Fencing and Screening: The transmission lines and substation outdoor training facilities contain power poles with associated power lines and typical components found in a substation. The majority of this area will be screened by the existing vegetation located on the west and south side of the parcel. The In-Processing Building is strategically located to provide screening for the majority of the Training Area. In addition, Xcel is proposing to install trees between the parking lot and Fenway Blvd, as well as in areas around the building and in parking lot islands to provide screening from neighboring properties. Fencing is being proposed around the substation infrastructure and south of the proposed building to prevent unauthorized access to the training yard infrastructure. Fencing around the substation is proposed to be 10’ tall. There will be a controlled gate where the gravel access drives enter the training area. The fencing and gate materials will be a combination of black architectural wrought iron and black chain link to match the existing fencing on the site. Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative Mechanical Equipment Screening: Mechanical equipment for the proposed building will either be located on the ground or internal of the building. As the mechanical equipment layout progresses, a screening design will be designed to meet Section 90-272 Code Requirements. Plans will be updated to show more detail for the mechanical equipment and associated screening for City review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Street and Access: The property currently has two access points from Fenway Boulevard. The project proposing one addition access point just north of the In-Processing Building and widening of the existing curb cut near the existing building. The north access is being proposed to be 24 feet wide and the existing access is being proposed to be 33 feet wide. Spacing for all proposed and modify access points exceed 150 feet. These access points meet the requirements of Section 90-222. Parking: Parking Required=186 Stalls. Proposed Parking Provided=329 Stalls. The proposal exceeds the required parking outlined in Section 90-253. Xcel is proposing to exceed the requirement number of parking stalls to meet the demand of anticipated Staff training events. Trails: There is a City trail along Fenway Boulevard North. Xcel is not proposing additional trails with this development. Building Architecture: Floor plans, elevations, and building renderings have been provided. Drainage/Grading: Treatment for stormwater runoff is being provided for both of the Transmission Line/Substation and In- Processing Building projects as part of this application. Supporting plans and hydrology calculations have been provided to confirm these basins meet the City of Hugo Stormwater Requirements and Policies. The property currently has two access points from Fenway Boulevard. Currently the site drains to the existing wetland or to the parcel just west of the Xcel property. Proposed drainage patterns will be similar to the existing drainage patterns and include two separate infiltrations basin which will ultimately overtop to the property to the west. Utilities: The proposed building will be served by existing sanitary and watermain service stubs adjacent to the property. Wetlands: Wetlands existing on the westerly side of the parcel and interior of the site near the proposed building. Xcel proposes to fill and mitigate the wetland in the interior of the site to allow for the required Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative improvements to the parcel. The proposed wetland to be filled is approximately 0.39 Acres in size and will be mitigated per City requirements using purchased Wetland Credits. A completed City Wetland Services Form has been included in this submittal. Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Amendment Xcel is requesting an amendment to the existing Conditional Use Permit to expand an outdoor electric training area. The proposed project meets the findings required for approval as follows: The proposed use is permissible by law. Exterior storage is an allowed conditional use as long as it is adequately screened. Based on the placement of the training area, location of the proposed In-Processing Building, existing vegetation, and proposed landscaping we believe the proposed plan is permissible. The proposed use is in keeping with the spirit and intent. The intent of the ordinance is to allow for exterior storage larger than the principal structure as long as it is adequately screened. Based on the placement of the training area, location of the proposed In- Processing Building, existing vegetation, and proposed landscaping we believe the proposed plan is in keeping with the intent of the code. The proposed use is compatible with the city’s comprehensive plan, and the character of the surrounding area. The comprehensive plan identifies this parcel as Business Park (BP). The character and the zoning of this area is largely industrial with additional BP Zoned Parcels. There are residential properties to the north and south of the proposed project but there are significant buffers of woodland, existing commercial buildings, and proposed landscaping to screen the Training Area from the residential properties. We believe the proposed project is compatible with existing uses of this parcel and with the character of the area. The proposed use has adequate drainage, water supply, electrical, gas, and sewage treatment facilities. The site has proposed utilities stubbed into the area to adequate serve the proposed building. Drainage and stormwater management are being provided to allow for positive drainage away from the proposed building and training areas to meet City requirements. The proposed use has adequate road access, and does not reduce the safety or capacity of the public road system. The proposed project is providing access point’s accordance to City requirements to Fenway that will allow for safe pedestrian and vehicular movements into and out of the Xcel site. The technical evaluation of the floodplain, if required, accurately represents the conditions and boundaries of the floodplain area, as well as correctly represents the proposed use’s impact on the floodplain. The project doesn’t propose to impact any existing floodplain areas. Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative The proposed use may not create a danger that materials may be swept onto other lands, or downstream to the injury of others, or block bridges, culverts, or other hydraulics. Temporary erosion control measures will be installed as part of construction in accordance to the approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). In addition to the temporary erosion control measure permanent stormwater management practices are being installed to quality and quantity to the runoff leaving the site. The proposed use will not damage or reduce the benefits the public receives from the public waters. Temporary erosion control measures will be installed as part of construction in accordance to the approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). In addition to the temporary erosion control measure permanent stormwater management practices are being installed to quality and quantity to the runoff leaving the site. If located in the shoreland overlay district, all structures and facilities are screened from view from public waters. The project is not located in an existing shoreland overlay district. If the permit is to approve a wetlands replacement plan, the plan is in conformance with the rules of the state board of the soil and water resources for such plans. Xcel is proposing filling an existing wetland onsite as part of this project. The project has been delineated and the delineation has been approved by the LGU and the TEP Panel. An application proposing this wetland fill and replacement using wetland credits has been submitted as part of this review. We believe this process is in conformance with the rules of the state. The applicant or operator shall obtain all necessary state and local permits for the conditional use. We believe with the site plan review, conditional use amendment, variance request, easement vacation, and wetland modification applications we meet these requirements. The proposed use is adequately buffered and screened from noncompatible land uses and public rights-of-way. We believe with the placement of the training area, location of the proposed In-Processing Building, existing vegetation, and proposed landscaping we believe the proposed plan is adequately buffered. Variance Request Xcel is requesting a variance to allow for a structures contain as part of the proposed training facility to exceed the 50-foot maximum allowed in the BP Zoning District. The proposed project meets the findings required for approval as follows: The variance as requested is permissible by law. The training center is a permissible use in the Business Park Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed Transmission lines are similar in nature to existing operable utility poles located around the City of Hugo. The proposed height of the towers are what the Xcel Team feels is required for their Staff to gain the training they need for real world situations. We believe the proposed plan minimizes adverse visual effects therefore is permissible by law. Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative Practical Difficulties A. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the ordinance. The additional Transmission Line facilities will not alter the use of the site as it will remain a utility training facility. The proposed Transmission lines are similar in nature to existing operable utility poles located around the City of Hugo. The proposed height of the towers are what the Xcel Team feels is required for their Staff to gain the training they need for real world situations. Based on the placement of the proposed transmission lines, substation, proposed In-Processing Building, existing vegetation, and proposed landscaping we believe the proposed use/variance is a reasonable use of the property. B. The plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The existing property is surrounded by mature wooded vegetation to the west and south which provides significant screening for the proposed training facilities from adjacent land uses including residential to the south. In addition to the existing vegetation, placement of the proposed In-Processing Building and proposed landscaping will provided significant screening from properties to the north and Fenway Boulevard to the east. Additionally, the proposed Transmission lines are similar in nature to existing operable utility poles located around the City of Hugo. C. The variance if granted will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The comprehensive plan identifies this parcel as Business Park (BP). The character and the zoning of this area is largely industrial with additional BP Zoned Parcels. There are residential properties to the north and south of the proposed project but there are significant buffers of woodland, existing commercial buildings, and proposed landscaping to screen the Training Area from the residential properties. We believe the proposed project including the requested variance is compatible with existing uses of this parcel and will not drastically change the site. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this chapter and with the policies of the city’s comprehensive plan. The intent of the ordinance is to allow for the training area as long as it is adequately screened. Based on the placement of the transmission lines, substation, location of the proposed In-Processing Building, existing vegetation, and proposed landscaping we believe the proposed variance is in keeping with the existing training facility and the intent of the code. The variance, if granted, shall not have the effect of allowing any use prohibited in the district. The training center is a permissible use in the Business Park Zoning District. Additionally, the proposed Transmission lines are similar in nature to existing operable utility poles located around the City of Hugo. The proposed height of the towers are what the Xcel Team feels is required for their Staff to gain the training they need for real world situations. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood protection than required by this chapter. The variance shall be determined the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative afford relief, and the variance shall not be issued with any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. The parcel in question is not located in any FEMA designated floodplain and the proposed site improvements doesn’t propose to impact any existing floodplain or floodway areas. Stormwater management is being provided for the proposed project in accordance to the City of Hugo requirements and will therefore reduce the volume and rate of stormwater leaving the site while providing treatment to the stormwater leaving the site. The sewage treatment and water system of the subject property is in compliance with city and state codes. The parcel doesn’t have any septic and/or wells. The existing buildings onsite and the proposed improvements will be served by City Sewer and Water. Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative Proposed Project 2 of 2: New Building Project We propose to construct a separate two-story building of approximately 30,000-40,000 square feet. The new building will allow Xcel Energy to relocate training activities that presently occur at our Minneapolis Riverside Training Center (RTC); establish advanced training laboratories and classrooms dedicated to Gas, Industrial Unmanned Inspection, centralized Safety, OSHA, Environmental and public training offerings. The new building will allow us to centralize a significant portion of Xcel Energy’s Technical Training operations as well as create operating efficiencies and improve the sharing of resources across our training programs, and the Hugo community. The project includes construction of virtual training classrooms and equips Xcel for operations in newly emerging technologies essential for carbon reduction, and the shift to green energy. If the site plan as shown with the specified parking facilities is permitted, Xcel will also utilize this facility for centralized Nuclear Contract Employee in processing prior to outage operations which occur across the state of Minnesota. Expected steady state employee use: • 3,000 employees with concentration in the Spring and Fall • 65-150 per day during off peak times. If Centralized Nuclear In-Processing remains viable: • 1,500 per year • 300 per day during peak times Estimated Schedule (Project 2 of 2): Design & Permitting: Summer-Fall 2023 Construction: 2024-2026 ΔFENWAY BLVD NORTH12 C 1111 11 ΔΔFENWAY BLVD NORTH16 16 16 WETLAND LINEWETLAND LINE C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 08 /04 / 2022 5:37 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C1-1 - EXISTING CONDITIONSOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY 414 NICOLLET MALL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Todd W. McLouth - PE 20383 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD HW TWM 08/05/22 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY N SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 EXISTING CONDITIONS C1-1 LEGEND: UE UF OU UG UT UTV >> I > x x UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CABLE TV UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FENCE CURB [TYPICAL] CONTOURS BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE GRAVEL SURFACE RIP RAP SURFACE FOUND MONUMENT MARKED RLS44900 (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) SET 1/2" IRON PIPE MARKED RLS NO. 25718 CABLE TV PEDESTAL AIR CONDITIONER ELECTRIC METER ELECTRIC PEDESTAL ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER LIGHT POLE GUY WIRE POWER POLE GAS MANHOLE GAS METER TELEPHONE MANHOLE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL SANITARY CLEANOUT SANITARY MANHOLE CATCH BASIN STORM DRAIN FLARED END SECTION STORM MANHOLE FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION HYDRANT CURB STOP WATER VALVE BOLLARD FLAG POLE MAIL BOX TRAFFIC SIGN UNKNOWN MANHOLE SPOT ELEVATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL ROOF DRAIN CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE NOTE: EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING INC., DATED 06/14/2022. FENWAY BLVD NORTH12 1111 11 FENWAY BLVD NORTH16 16 16 REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVING (TYP.) REMOVE EXISTING CONC. C&G (TYP.) REMOVE EXISTING TREE (TYP.) REMOVE EXISTING GRAVEL REMOVE EXISTING CONC. PAVEMENT (TYP.) REMOVE EXISTING BIT. TRAIL (TYP.) REMOVE EXISTING CONC. C&G (TYP.) LIMITS OF WETLAND FILL. WETLAND FILL AND MITIGATION BY CARLSON MCCAIN. EXISTING FENCING AND GATE TO REMAIN ADJUST AND REPLACE CASTING AS NEEDED C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 08 /04 / 2022 5:37 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C1-2 - DEMOLITION PLANOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY 414 NICOLLET MALL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Todd W. McLouth - PE 20383 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD HW TWM 08/05/22 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY N SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 DEMOLITION PLAN C1-2 1.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITIES AS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ACTIVITIES WITH UTILITY COMPANIES. 2.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL. 3.CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, STRIP TOP SOIL, AND STOCKPILE ON-SITE. REFER TO GRADING PLAN AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SEDIMENT AND EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. 4.CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE SITE DAILY. ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND REMOVALS SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. SEE THE GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN. 5.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SITE SURFACE FEATURES WITHIN REMOVAL LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SITE DEMOLITION NOTES REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER, RETAINING WALLS, FENCE, ETC. REMOVE EXISTING MANHOLES, POWER POLES, LIGHT POLES, BOLLARDS, PARKING METERS, SIGNS, ETC. REMOVE EXISTING UTILITIES REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVING DEMOLITION LEGEND: REMOVE EXISTING GRAVEL TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. NOTE: EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING INC., DATED 06/14/2022. LEGEND: UE UF OU UG UT UTV >> I > x x UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CABLE TV UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FENCE CURB [TYPICAL] CONTOURS BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE GRAVEL SURFACE RIP RAP SURFACE FOUND MONUMENT MARKED RLS44900 (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) SET 1/2" IRON PIPE MARKED RLS NO. 25718 CABLE TV PEDESTAL AIR CONDITIONER ELECTRIC METER ELECTRIC PEDESTAL ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER LIGHT POLE GUY WIRE POWER POLE GAS MANHOLE GAS METER TELEPHONE MANHOLE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL SANITARY CLEANOUT SANITARY MANHOLE CATCH BASIN STORM DRAIN FLARED END SECTION STORM MANHOLE FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION HYDRANT CURB STOP WATER VALVE BOLLARD FLAG POLE MAIL BOX TRAFFIC SIGN UNKNOWN MANHOLE SPOT ELEVATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL ROOF DRAIN CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE FENWAY BLVD NORTHFENWAY BLVD NORTH416 16 11 6 16 16 16 16 16 9 14 122 22 22 22 22 11 29 16 12 5 161 61 POND 1 NWL=924.0 HWL=926.9 BTM=918.0 POND 2 NWL=919.0 HWL=920.6 BTM=914.0 FFE=933.0 7 24.0' 9.0' TYP 18.0' TYPB612 C&G (TYP.)24.0' 9.0' TYP 18.0' TYP 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 18.0' TYP 18.0' TYP 32.0'24.0' 10.0' 24.0' 9.0' TYP 18.0' TYP 10.0' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT ADA SIGN TYP SEE DETAIL TYPICAL ADA PARKING STALLS SEE DETAIL 47.4' 47.4' 24.0' 9.0' TYP 18.0' TYP 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 25.0' 5.0' 10.5' B612 C&G (TYP.) 33.0' PROPOSED SUBSTATION AREA PROJECT PROPOSED IN-PROCESSING BUILDING PROJECT GRAVEL PARKING AREA PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINES (SEE PLANS PREPARED BY OTHERS) 24' TYP 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R5'R5'R5'R 25'R 25'R 5'R 20'R 26'R 23'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 50'R 50'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 10'R 15'R 15'R 10'R 44'R 15'R 25'R 25'R 50'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 4.5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 4.5'R 4.5'R 4.5'R 4.5'R 4.5'R CONCRETE APRON SEE CITY DETAIL 24.0' PROPOSED IN-PROCESSING BUILDING CONCRETE PAVEMENT FUTURE SOLAR TRAINING AREA FLAT CURB FLAT CURB 18.0' PATIO FUTURE WIND TURBINE TRAINING AREA PROPOSED FENCE AND GATE TO MATCH EXISTING PROPOSED SUBSTATION SEE PLANS PREPARED BY OTHERS PROPOSED TRAINING AREAPROPOSED SUBSTATION AREACONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) POLE HEIGHT=85' POLE HEIGHT=79' POLE HEIGHT=70' POLE HEIGHT=70' POLE HEIGHT=105' POLE HEIGHT=57' POLE HEIGHT=43' POLE HEIGHT=48' POLE HEIGHT=55' POLE HEIGHT=61' POLE HEIGHT=62' POLE HEIGHT=52' POLE HEIGHT=64' POLE HEIGHT=57' POLE HEIGHT=61' POLE HEIGHT=83' POLE HEIGHT=57' POLE HEIGHT=52' POLE HEIGHT=52' POLE HEIGHT=52' POLE HEIGHT=57' POLE HEIGHT=57' POLE HEIGHT=66' POLE HEIGHT=71' POLE HEIGHT=52' C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 08 /04 / 2022 5:38 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C2-1 - SITE PLANOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY 414 NICOLLET MALL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL Nathan W. Ekhoff - LA Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 52050 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD CEF NWE 08/05/22 C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY N SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 1.ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 2.ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS. 3.ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4.ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9' X 18' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6.ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 5.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING. 8.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN FOR BUILDING SETBACKS. DENOTES CONCRETE PAVEMENT DENOTES HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DENOTES LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SITE NOTES PAVEMENT LEGEND PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN 373PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING 3DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! SITE PLAN C2-1 CURRENT ZONING:BUSINESS PARK PROPOSED ZONING:BUSINESS PARK PROPERTY AREA:1,226,373 SF / ±28.1 AC PROPOSED BUILDING AREA:70,488 sf / ±1.6 ac (5.7%) ALLOWED UP TO 40% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA:514,677 sf / ±11.8 ac (41.9%) ALLOWED UP TO 80% SITE DATA CODE REQUIRED PARKING FOR PROPOSED BUILDING 34,740 OFFICE BUILDING / 200 =173 PARKING STALLS 6200 TRAINING LABS / 500 =13 PARKING STALLS TOTAL =186 PARKING STALLS PROPOSED PARKING PROVIDED EXISTING STALLS REMOVED =22 PROPOSED STALLS =351 NEW TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED =329 OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT 30 FT MINIMUM SIDE EQUAL TO HEIGHT OF BUILDING (NOT LESS THAN 10 FT) MINIMUM REAR 30 FT MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING AND DESIGN STANDARD REQUIREMENTS OFF-STREET PARKING SETBACKS: FRONT 10 FT MINIMUM SIDE 5 FT MINIMUM REAR 5 FT MINIMUM MINIMUM PARKING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS (90 DEGREE PATTERN): PARKING SPACE WIDTH = 9 FT PARKING SPACE LENGTH = 18 FT DRIVE LANE WIDTH = 24 FT DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS NOTE: EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING INC., DATED 06/14/2022. DENOTES GRAVEL PAVEMENT FENWAY BLVD NORTHFENWAY BLVD NORTHx 88888888x x x x x x x x x x x 932.5 929.5 928.5 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 POND 1 NWL=924.0 HWL=926.9 BTM=918.0 POND 2 NWL=919.0 HWL=920.6 BTM=914.0 930 930932932 932932932 930 930 931.6 931.5 931.5931.6 931.0 930.7 929.0 931.0 930.5 930.3 931.0 929.0 930.0 930.0 930.0 931.6931.7932.5 932.4931.9932.5 931.8 931.5931.8 930.2 929.5 931.0 931.5 931.1 931.1 931.3 932.1 930.0 929.5929.0 932.7 932.7 932.1 932.5 932.5 932.0 932.2 931.0 931.5 930.3 931.0 931.5 930.6 930.2 931.1 931.5 930.5 931.0 930.3 SB24 931.2388888888x920.6 x 932.0 931.0 x 929.5x929.5 x 931.0 x 931.5 x 931.5 x931.5 x 930.7 x 931.5 x 931.5 x931.5 x 931.0x930.6 x 931.0 x 927.0 x FFE=933.0 932.9 920924 928926926928919 919926 93 2936934918914924922919916914916919922918926928926928 9289269 3 0 932 933 9339 3 2929928928 932932926 928 930 930930 930 930 9309309309309 3 0930 930928 928926924 920919 920914916918919920922924920919920924.4924.4924.49249249249239239239229229229209209209189189180.5%932.7932.5 932.0 932.3932.1931.89 3 2 . 0 931.7 x 929.5 930 x 931.5 x 932.0 x 932.0 x 932.0 0.5%931.28888888918C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 08 /04 / 2022 5:39 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C3-1 - GRADING PLANOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY 414 NICOLLET MALL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Todd W. McLouth - PE 20383 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD HW TWM 08/05/22 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY N SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN 373PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING 3DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! SEE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR SOIL STABILIZATION INFORMATION. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AROUND THE ENTIRE SITE PERIMETER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, CITY REQUIREMENTS AND THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL DETAILS SHEETS OF THESE PLANS. ALL CURB SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO GUTTER LINE-UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 1.SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.10 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 3.ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF PREMIUM TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. VERIFY WITH LANDSCAPE PLAN. 4.FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 5.REFER TO THE REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND REVIEW (REPORT NO.16.61753.100), DATED 12/08/16 AS PREPARED BY NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INC. FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS. 6.STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS, OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 7.DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 8.SEE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. 9.SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION. 10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. 11.A STREET SWEEPER MUST BE AVAILABLE WITHIN 3 HOURS UPON NOTICE FROM THE CITY THAT THE STREETS NEED TO BE SWEPT. 12.THE CONTRACTOR ALONG WITH THE OWNER SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS FROM GOVERNING AUTHORITIES, INCLUDING ANY CITY PERMITS AND THE NPDES PERMIT FROM THE MPCA. 13.INSTALL EROSION CONTROL AND TREE PROTECTION MEASURES BEFORE BEGINNING SITE GRADING ACTIVITIES. SOME EROSION CONTROLS SUCH AS BALE CHECKS AND TEMPORARY SILT PONDS MAY BE INSTALLED AS GRADING OCCURS IN SPECIFIC AREAS. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROLS THROUGHOUT THE GRADING PROCESS AND REMOVE WHEN TURF HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 14.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA NPDES PERMIT. THE AREA TO BE DISTURBED SHALL BE MINIMIZED AND TURF SHALL BE ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE TIME REQUIRED. 15.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. 16.FINAL GRADING TOLERANCES ARE +/-0.1 FEET TO FINISH GRADES. 17.UNDER PAVEMENTS COMPACT THE UPPER 3 FEET OF SUBGRADE TO 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AND 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY BLOW THE UPPER 3 FEET OF SUBGRADE. OUTSIDE PAVEMENT AREAS COMPACT EMBANKMENTS TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. 18. WORKING HOURS ARE 7:00 AM - 10:00 PM, MONDAY - SATURDAY. A 48 HOUR NOTICED IS REQUIRED FOR SATURDAY WORK. 19.THE CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE A CITY LICENSE. 20.A CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO WORKING WITHIN CITY ROW. 21.TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT (TRM) SHALL BE LANDLOK 450, AS MANUFACTURED BY PROPEX GEOSOLUTIONS, OR APPROVED EQUAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL OF THE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS FOR INSTALLATION. 22.STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL, FENCING AND HANDRAIL DESIGN BY OTHERS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL SPECIFICATIONSWARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. GRADING PLAN C3-1 NOTE: EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING INC., DATED 06/14/2022. FENWAY BLVD NORTHFENWAY BLVD NORTH88888888POND 1 NWL=924.0 HWL=926.9 BTM=918.0 POND 2 NWL=919.0 HWL=920.6 BTM=914.0 930 930932932 932932932 930 930 SB24 931.2388888888FFE=933.0 920924 928926926928919 919926 93 2936934918914924922919916914916919922918926928926928 9289269 3 0 932 933 9339 3 2929928928 932932926 928 930 930930 930 930 9309309309309 3 0930 930928 928926924 920919 920914916918919920922924920919920924.4924.4924.4924924924923923923922922922920920920918918918930 8888888918INLET PROTECTION TYP-SEE DETAIL SILT FENCE TYP-SEE DETAIL SILT FENCE STAGE 2 TYP-SEE DETAIL EROSION CONTROL BLANKET TYP-SEE DETAIL SILT FENCE TYP-SEE DETAIL DOUBLE ROW SILT FENCE TYP-SEE DETAIL SILT FENCE STAGE 2 TYP-SEE DETAIL SILT FENCE TYP-SEE DETAIL INLET PROTECTION TYP-SEE DETAIL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SEE DETAIL C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 08 /04 / 2022 5:39 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C3-2 - SWPPP PLANOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY 414 NICOLLET MALL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Todd W. McLouth - PE 20383 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD HW TWM 08/05/22 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY N SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 SWPPP PLAN C3-2 PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN 373PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING 3DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! INLET PROTECTION SILT FENCE EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERN SEE SHEET C3-3 FOR SWPPP NOTES EROSION CONTROL BLANKET GENERAL NOTES SWPPP LEGEND NOTE: EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING INC., DATED 06/14/2022. C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 08 /04 / 2022 5:40 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C3-2 - SWPPP PLANOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY 414 NICOLLET MALL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Todd W. McLouth - PE 20383 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD HW TWM 08/05/22 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY SWPPP NOTES C3-3 1.THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF CONSTRUCTING A FOUR-STORY APARTMENT BUILDING & THE ASSOCIATED PARKING, UTILITIES, & STORM WATER TREATMENT AREAS . 2.THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE AS FOLLOWS: 1.INSTALL VEHICLE TRACKING BMP 2.INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND SITE 3.INSTALL PROTECTIVE FENCE AROUND FILTRATION AREAS 4.CLEAR AND GRUB SITE 5.STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL 6.REMOVE PAVEMENTS AND UTILITIES 7.CONSTRUCT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINS 8.INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND BASINS 9.ROUGH GRADE SITE 10.IMPORT CLEAN FILL FOR REPLACEMENT AND BALANCE 11.INSTALL UTILITIES 12.INSTALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS 13.INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER 14.INSTALL PAVEMENTS AND WALKS 15.FINAL GRADE SITE 16.REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASINS 17.CONSTRUCT FILTRATION TRENCHES 18.SEED AND MULCH 19.WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. 3.SITE DATA: AREA OF DISTURBANCE:X.XX± AC PRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA:X.XX AC POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA:X.XX AC GENERAL SOIL TYPE:XXX, XXX XXX 4.THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH FLAGS, STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. 5.ALL DISTURBED GROUND LEFT INACTIVE FOR SEVEN (7) OR MORE DAYS SHALL BE STABILIZED BY SEEDING OR SODDING (ONLY AVAILABLE PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15) OR BY MULCHING OR COVERING OR OTHER EQUIVALENT CONTROL MEASURE. 6.ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES, SLOPE LENGTHS CAN NOT BE GREATER THAN 75 FEET. DENOTES SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1. ALL 3:1 SLOPES TO BE STABILIZED WITH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 7.ALL STORM DRAINS AND INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED UNTIL ALL SOURCES OF POTENTIAL DISCHARGE ARE STABILIZED. 8.TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL AND CAN NOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS OR STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SILT, CLAY, OR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ARE EXEPMT EX: CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCK PILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES. 9.SEDIMENT LADEN WATER MUST BE DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF NOT POSSIBLE, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE BMP'S. 10.SOLID WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. 11.EXTERNAL WASHING OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED AREA OF THE SITE, RUNOFF MUST BE PROPERLY CONTAINED. 12.NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. 13.THE OWNER WHO SIGNS THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION IS A PERMITTEE AND IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. THE OPERATOR (CONTRACTOR) WHO SIGNS THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION IS A PERMITTEE FOR ALL APPLICABLE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN SECTIONS 3, 4, 6-24 OF THE NPDES PERMIT AND IS JOINTLY RESPONSIBLE WITH THE OWNER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PERMIT. 14.TERMINATION OF COVERAGE-PERMITTEE(S) WISHING TO TERMINATE COVERAGE MUST SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) TO THE MPCA. ALL PERMITTEE(S) MUST SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: A.FINAL STABILIZATION, PER NPDES PERMIT SECTION 13 HAS BEEN ACHIEVED ON ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE FOR WHICH THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE. B.TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP AS DESCRIBED IN THE PERMIT. 15. INSPECTIONS A.INITIAL INSPECTION FOLLOWING SILT FENCE INSTALLATION BY CITY REPRESENTATIVE IS REQUIRED. B.EXPOSED SOIL AREAS: ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS FOLLOWING A 0.5" OVER 24 HOUR RAIN EVENT. C.STABILIZED AREAS: ONCE EVERY 30 DAYS D.FROZEN GROUND: AS SOON AS RUNOFF OCCURS OR PRIOR TO RESUMING CONSTRUCTION. E.INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED FOR 3 YEARS AFTER FILING OF THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION AND MUST INCLUDE: DATE AND TIME OF ACTION, NAME OF PERSON(S) CONDUCTING WORK, FINDING OF INSPECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION, DATE AND AMOUNT OF RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN A 24 HOUR PERIOD. 16. MINIMUM MAINTENANCE A.SILT FENCE TO BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, SUPPLEMENTED WHEN NONFUNCTIONAL, OR 1/3 FULL; WITHIN 24 HOURS B.SEDIMENT BASINS DRAINED AND SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN REACHES 1/2 STORAGE VOLUME. REMOVAL MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY. C.SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM SURFACE WATERS WITHIN (7)SEVEN DAYS D.CONSTRUCTION SITE EXITS INSPECTED, TRACKED SEDIMENT REMOVED WITH 24 HOURS. E.PROVIDE COPIES OF EROSION INSPECTION RESULTS TO CITY ENGINEER FOR ALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 12" IN 24 HOURS 17.THE SWPPP, INCLUDING ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY BY THE PERMITTEE(S) WHO HAVE OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THE SITE. 18.OWNER MUST KEEP RECORDS OF ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT, THE SWPPP, ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE, PERMANENT OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS, AND REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. THESE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED FOR THREE YEARS AFTER FILING NPDES NOTICE OF TERMINATION. 19.SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED WHEN: A.THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASONAL CONDITIONS THAT HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON DISCHARGE B.INSPECTIONS INDICATE THAT THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE AND DISCHARGE IS EXCEEDING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. C.THE BMP'S IN THE SWPPP ARE NOT CONTROLLING POLLUTANTS IN DISCHARGES OR IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. 20.CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA A.CONCRETE WASH-OUT IS NOT ALLOWED ON-SITE. 21.IN THE EVENT OF ENCOUNTERING A WELL OR SPRING DURING CONSTRUCTION CONTRACTOR TO CEASE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND NOTIFY ENGINEER. 22.PIPE OULTETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. 23.FINAL STABILIZATION FINAL STABILIZATION REQUIRES THAT ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACVTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND THAT DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH 70% OF THE EXPECTED FINAL DENSITY, AND THAT ALL PERMANENT PAVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. ALL TEMPORARY BMP'S SHALL BE REMOVED, DITCHES STABILIZED, AND SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM PERMANENT CONVEYANCES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS IN ORDER TO RETURN THE POND TO DESIGN CAPACITY. 24. TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS A.THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MADE OPERATIONAL PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE OF 10 OR MORE ACRES DRAINING TO A COMMON LOCATION. B.TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO RUNOFF LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR ENTERING SURFACE WATERS WHEN 10 OR MORE ACRES OF DISTURBED SOILS DRAIN TO A COMMON LOCATION. THE BASIN MUST PROVIDE 3,600 CUBIC FEET OF STORAGE BELOW THE OUTLET PER ACRE DRAINED. IF HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS ARE AVAILABLE, THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN MUST PROVIDE A STORAGE VOLUME EQUIVALENT TO THE 2-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM, BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN 1800 CUBIC FEET PER ACRE DRAINED. THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN MUST BE CONSTRUCTED AND MADE OPERATIONAL CONCURRENT WITH THE START OF SOIL DISTURBANCE UP GRADIENT OF THE POND. THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PREVENT SHORT CIRCUITING. THE OUTFALL SHALL BE DESIGNED TO REMOVE FLOATABLE DEBRIS, ALLOW FOR COMPLETE DRAWDOWN OF THE POND FOR MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES, AND HAVE ENERGY DISSIPATION. THE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY SHALL BE STABILIZED. C.TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS SHALL BE SITUATED OUTSIDE OF SURFACE WATERS AND ANY REQUIRED BUFFER ZONE, AND MUST BE DESIGNED TO AVOID DRAINING WETLANDS, UNLESS THE IMPACT IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PERMIT. D.EXCESSIVE SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER THAT IS NOT PROPERLY FILTERED WILL NOT BE PERMITTED TO DISCHARGE FROM SITE. 25.DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING A.TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASIN DRAINING SHALL BE DISCHARGED TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT SEDIMENTATION BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. THE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT BASIN MAY DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS IF THE BASIN WATER HAS BEEN VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE TREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED IN THE BASIN AND THAT THE NUISANCE CONDITIONS WILL NOT RESULT FROM THE DISCHARGE. DISCHARGE POINTS SHALL BE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND PROPER VELOCITY DISSIPATION PROVIDED. B.ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN-DRAINING ACTIVITIES MUST BE DISCHARGED IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE NUISANCE CONDITIONS, EROSION IN THE RECEIVING CHANNELS OR ON DOWN SLOPE PROPERTIES, OR INUNDATION IN WETLANDS CAUSING SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE WETLAND. C.IF FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATERS ARE USED, THE BACKWASH WATER SHALL BE HAULED AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURNED TO THE BEGINING OF THE TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATED INTO SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE EROSION. BACKWASH WATER MAY BE DISCHARGED TO SANITARY SEWER IF PERMISSION IS GRANTED BY THE SANITARY SEWER AUTHORITY. 26.POLLUTION PREVENTION A.BUILDING PRODUCTS THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO LEACH POLLUTANTS MUST BE UNDER COVER TO PREVENT DISCHARGE OR PROTECTED BY AN EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. B.PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES, INSECTICIDES, FERTILIZERS, TREATMENT CHEMICALS, AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS MUST BE UNDER COVER. C.HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE MUST BE PROTECTED TO PREVENT VANDALISM. D.SOLID WASTE MUST BE STORED, COLLECTED AND DISPOSED OF IN COMPLIANCE WITH MINN. R. CH 7035. E.PORTABLE TOILETS MUST BE POSITIONED SO THAT THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL NOT BE TIPPED OR KNOCKED OVER. SANITARY WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH 7041. F.DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED SHALL BE PREVENTED USING DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS. SUPPLIES SHALL BE AVAILABLE AT ALL TIMES TO CLEAN UP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED MATERIALS. 27. DESIGN CALCULATIONS TEMPORARY & PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT ARE DESIGNED TO MEET MPCA GENERAL & SPECIAL WATER REQUIREMENTS. CALCULATIONS ARE PART OF THE HYDROLOGY REPORT, WHICH IS TO BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE SWPP DOCUMENTS. SEE HYDROLOGY REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. 28.GENERAL STORMWATER DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS ALL REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN SECTIONS 5-7, 14, 16-19, 21, 24 OF THE PERMIT FOR DESIGN OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND DISCHARGE HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SWPP. THESE INCLUDE BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TO: A.THE EXPECTED AMOUNT, FREQUENCY, INTENSITY, AND DURATION PRECIPITATION. B.THE NATURE OF STORMWATER RUNOFF AND RUN-ON AT THE SITE. C.PEAK FLOW RATES AND STORWATER VOLUMES TO MINIMIZE EROSION AT OUTLETS AND DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL AND STREAM BANK EROSION. D.THE RANGE OF SOIL PARTICLE SIZES EXPECTED TO BE PRESENT ON THE SITE. 29.CONSTRUCTION OF FILTRATION BASINS A.NO HEAVY TRAFFIC ON FILTRATION AREAS. CONSTRUCTION TO BE DONE WITH MINIMAL COMPACTION TO FILTRATION AREAS. IF COMPACTION IS ENCOUNTERED, BASIN SOILS FOR THE FIRST & MUST BE REMOVED & RELAID. B.INFILTRATION SYSTEMS MUST NOT BE EXCAVATED TO FINAL GRADE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAD BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND FULLY STABILIZED UNLESS RIGOROUS EROSIN PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE PROVIDED( SECTION 16.4). C.WHEN AN INFILTRATION SYSTEM IS EXCAVATED TO FINAL GRADE (OR WITHIN THREE (3) FEET OF FINAL GRADE), THE PERMITTEE(S) MUST EMPLOY RIGOROUS EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO KEEP SEDIMENT AND RUNOFF COMPLETELY AWAY FROM THE INFILTRATION AREA. THE AREA MUST BE STAKED OFF AND MARKED SO THAT HEAVY CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT WILL NOT COMPACT THE SOIL IN THE PROPOSED INFILTRATION AREA. D.TO PREVENT CLOGGING OF THE INFILTRATION OR FILTRATION SYSTEM, THE PERMITTEE(S) MUST USE A PRETREATMENT DEVICE SUCH AS A VEGETATED FILTER STRIP, SMALL SEDIMENTATION BASIN, OR WATER QUALITY INLET (E.G., GRIT CHAMBER) TO SETTLE PARTICULATES BEFORE THE STORMWATER DISCHARGES INTO THE INFILTRATION OF FILTRATION SYSTEM. 30.POST CONSTRUCTION THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME THAT MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE BY THE PROJECT'S PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESCRIBED IN SECTION 15 SHALL BE ONE (1) INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED BY THE PROJECT. SEE SECTION 15. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON INFILTRATION DESIGN, PROHIBITIONS AND APPROPRIATE SITE CONDITIONS. 31.RESPONSIBILITIES A.THE OWNER MUST IDENTIFY A CONTRACTOR WHO WILL OVERSEE THE SWPPP IMPLEMENTATION AND THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE: B.THE OWNER MUST IDENTIFY THE A PERSON WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR LONG TERM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: 32.TRAINING REQEMENTS THE PERMITTES(S) SHALL ENSURE THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS IDENTIFIED IN THIS PART HAVE BEEN TRIANED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS PERMIT'S TRAINING REQUIREMENTS. 1. WHO MUST BE TRAINED: A. INDIVIDUAL(S) PREPARING THE SWPPP FOR THE PROJECT B. INDIVIDUAL(S) OVERSEEING IMPLEMENTATION OF, REVISING, AND/OR AMENDING THE SWPPP AND INDIVIDUALS(S) PERFORMING INSPECTIONS FOR THE PROJECT. ONE OF THESE INDIVDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY THE MPCA. C.INDIVIDUAL(S) PERFORMING OR SUPERVISING THE INSTALLATION, MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF BMPS. AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL ON A PROJECT MUST BE TRAINED IN THES JOB DUTIES. 2.TRAINING CONTENT: THE CONTENT AND EXTENT OF TRAINING MUST BE COMMENSURATE WITH THE INDIVIDUAL'S JOB DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES WITH REGARD TO ACTIVITIES COVERED UNDER THIS PERMIT FOR THE PROJECT. AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT ON THE PERMITTED PROJECT SITE (OR AVAVILABLE TO THE PROJECT SITE IN 72 HOURS) MUST BE TRAINED IN THE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN SECTION 21.2B AND SECTION 21.2C. 33.THE PERMITTEE(S) SHALL ENSURE THAT THE INDIVIDUALS ARE TRAINED BY LOCAL, STATE, FEDERAL AGENCIES, PROFESSIONAL OR OTHER ENTITIES WITH EXPERTISE IN EROSION PREVENTION, SEDIMENT CONTROL, PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND THE MINNESOTA NPDES/SDS CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT. AN UPDATE REFESHER-TREINING MUST BE ATTENDED EVERY THREE (3) YEARS STARTING THREE (3) YEARS FROM THE ISSUANCE DATE OF THIS PERMIT. 33.LIST OF CONTACTS * MPCA 24HR. HAZARDOUS SPILL HOTLINE: 651-649-5457 OF 80420798 DESCRIPTION UNIT TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA PREFABRICATED CONCRETE WASHOUT EA SILT FENCE (STANDARD)LF EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY INLET PROTECTION EA QUANTITY 1 NOT ALLOWED XXX XXX XXX SEEDING AC XXX PERMANENT POND VOLUME = X.XX AF WATER QUALITY VOLUME REQUIRED = 1.0" * X.XAC * 1/12 = X.XX AF WATER QUALITY VOLUME PROVIDED =X.XX AF (TOTAL LIVE STORAGE) NAME OF WATER BODY TYPE OF WATER BODY SPECIAL WATER IMAIRED WATER TYPE OF SPECIAL WATER XXX XXX XXX XXX TITLE NAME OWNER XXX COMPANY PHONE NUMBER XXX PROJECT MANAGER XXX LOUCKS XXX ENGINEER SWPPP XXX XXXLOUCKS CONTRACTOR SITE MANGER XXX XXX SWPPP NOTES ESTIMATED QUANTITIES STORMWATER POND 1 RECEIVING WATERS CERTIFICATION INLET PROTECTION - FILTER BAG INSERT 3 FRONT, BACK, AND BOTTOM TO BE MADE FROM SINGLE PIECE OF FABRIC MINIMUM DOUBLE STITCHED SEAMS ALL AROUND SIDE PIECES AND ON FLAP POCKETS (CAN BE INSTALLED IN ANY INLET TYPE WITH OR WITHOUT A CURB BOX) 8" 12" 4" 2" 2 4 FILTER BAG INSERT 1 OVERFLOW HOLES (2" X 4" HOLE SHALL BE HEAT CUT INTO ALL FOUR SIDE PANELS) 1/2 W D W 1/ 2 D INLET SPECIFICATIONS AS PER THE PLAN DIMENSION LENGTH AND WIDTH TO MATCH FLAP POCKET 4 NOTES: SEE SPECS. 2573, 3137, 3886 & 3891. MANUFACTURED ALTERNATIVES LISTED ON Mn/DOT'S APPROVED PRODUCTS LIST MAY BE SUBSTITUTED. 1.ALL GEOTEXTILE USED FOR INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MONOFILAMENT IN BOTH DIRECTIONS, MEETING SPEC. 3886. 2.FINISHED SIZE, INCLUDING POCKETS WHERE REQUIRED SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10 INCHES AROUND THE PERIMETER TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE OR REMOVAL. 3.INSTALLATION NOTES: 3.1.DO NOT INSTALL FILTER BAG INSERT IN INLETS SHALLOWER THAN 30 INCHES, MEASURED FROM THE BOTTOM OF THE INLET TO THE TOP OF THE GRATE. 3.2.THE INSTALLED BAG SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SIDE CLEARANCE OF 3 INCHES BETWEEN THE INLET WALLS AND THE BAG, MEASURED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OVERFLOW HOLES. 3.3.WHERE NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLINCH THE BAG, USING PLASTIC ZIP TIES, TO ACHIEVE THE 3 INCH SIDE CLEARANCE. 4.FLAP POCKETS SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCEPT WOOD 2 INCH X 4 INCH OR USE A ROCK SOCK OR SAND BAGS IN PLACE OF THE FLAP POCKETS. DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3015LOUCKS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 6" 6" 1' TO 3'ANCHOR TRENCH 1.DIG 6"X6" TRENCH 2.LAY BLANKETS IN TRENCH 3.STAPLE AT 1.5' INTERVALS 4.BACKFILL WITH NATURAL SOIL AND COMPACT. 5.BLANKET LENGTH SHALL NOT EXCEED 100' WITHOUT AN ANCHOR TRENCH NOTE: SLOPE SURFACE SHALL BE FREE OF ROCKS, SOIL CLUMPS, STICKS, VEHICLE IMPRINTS, AND GRASS. BLANKETS SHALL HAVE GOOD SOIL CONTACT. ANCHOR TRENCH (SEE DETAIL AND NOTES BELOW) OVERLAP END JOINTS MINIMUM OF 6" AND STAPLE OVERLAP AT 1.5' INTERVALS. OVERLAP LONGITUDINAL JOINTS MINIMUM OF 6" STAPLE PATTERN/DENSITY SHALL FOLLOW MANUFACTURERS SPECIFICATIONS. DI R E C T I O N O F SU R F A C E F L O W STAGGER JOINTS DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3016LOUCKS FENWAY BLVD NORTHFENWAY BLVD NORTHSEE DETAIL CBMH 107 RIM= 930.30 INV=926.30 (12") NW CBMH 106 RIM= 930.00 INV= 925.81 (12") SE INV= 925.81 (12") NE INV=925.81 (15") NW 8CBMH 105 RIM= 930.00 INV= 925.57 (15") SE INV=925.57 (15") NW 8CBMH 104 RIM= 930.00 INV= 925.41 (15") SE INV=925.41 (15") NW CBMH 103 RIM= 929.00 INV= 925.17 (15") SE INV=925.17 (15") NW 8CBMH 102 RIM= 929.00 INV= 925.00 (15") SE INV=925.00 (18") NW 8FES 100 INV= 924.00 (18") SE CBMH 203 RIM= 929.50 INV= 925.50 (12") SE INV=925.50 (12") W CBMH 202 RIM= 929.00 INV= 924.90 (12") E INV=924.90 (15") W 88CBMH 201 RIM= 929.50 INV= 924.30 (15") E INV=924.30 (15") W 8FES 200 INV= 924.00 (15") E 76 LF 12" STM @ 0.64% 60 LF 15" STM @ 0.40% 41 LF 15" STM @ 0.40% 60 LF 15" STM @ 0.40% 43 LF 15" STM @ 0.40% 78 LF 18" STM @ 1.27% 128 LF 12" STM @ 0.47% 83 LF 15" STM @ 0.72% 25 LF 15" STM @ 1.21% FES 302 INV=916.00 (12") S OCS 301 RIM=920.0 INV= 916.00 (12") N INV=919.00 (12") SW 888 LF 12" PVC SAN @ 0.00% FES 300 INV= 918.50 (12") NE 19 LF 12" PVC SAN @ 2.61% POND 1 NWL=924.0 HWL=926.9 BTM=918.0 POND 2 NWL=919.0 HWL=920.6 BTM=914.0 8888249 LF 12" STM @ 0.22%8888210 LF 12" STM @ 0.21% FES 303 INV= 919.00 (12") E STMH 304 INV= 919.45 (12") E INV=919.45 (12") W OCS 305 INV= 919.00 (12") E INV=920.00 (12") W 33 LF 12" STM @ 0.00% FES 306 INV=919.00 (12") W FFE=933.0 44448888888179 LF 12" STM @ 0.50% CB 204 RIM= 931.02 INV=926.39 (12") NW 238 LF 12" STM @ 0.50% CB 108 RIM= 930.30 INV=927.00 (12") SW CONSTRUCT MANHOLE OVER EX. PVC STUB INV=925.36±8" DIP WM212 LF 8" SAN SEWER @ 1.0%8" DIP WMHYD 6" G.V. HYD 6" G.V. MH 1 RIM=931.50 INV=925.36±44448" COMBINED SERVICE CONFIRM SIZE AND LOCATION WITH MECHANICAL ENGINEER 8" SANIATARY SERVICE INVERT=927.41 8"GV 8" TEE CONFIRM SIZE AND LOCATION WITH MECHANICAL ENGINEER (INSULATE) 6" DRAINTILE 6" DRAINTILE C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 08 /04 / 2022 5:41 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C4-1 - UTILITY PLANOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY 414 NICOLLET MALL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Todd W. McLouth - PE 20383 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD HW TWM 08/05/22 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY N SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS,THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, THE LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT , AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 2018 EDITION. 2.ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL. ALL COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION AND THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. 3.ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC UTILITIES. 4.ALL STORM SEWER , SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE 5' FROM THE BUILDING FACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6.ALL NEW WATERMAIN AND SERVICES MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER. EXTRA DEPTH MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM SEWER LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE ATTAINED. 7.ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8.PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: WATERMAIN CL 52 DIP 6" TO 8" DIAMETER SANITARY SEWER PVC SDR 35 & SCH 40 6" TO 8" DIAMETER STORM SEWER DUAL WALL HDPE 12" TO 18" DIAMETER 9.ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATCH BASINS, LOCATED WITHIN 10 FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.2820 10.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR WATERTIGHT (SEE MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0700). APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES. 11.HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINS MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES, PART 4715.0540: a.PIPES 4-INCH TO 10-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH AASHTO M252. b.PIPES 12-INCH TO 60-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM F2306. c.ALL FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D3212. d.WATER-TIGHT JOINTS MUST BE USED AT ALL CONNECTIONS INCLUDING STRUCTURES. 12. CONTRACTOR AND MANHOLE FABRICATOR SHALL SUMP (LOWER) ALL STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN CASTINGS WITHIN PAVED AREAS 0.16 FEET OR 2-INCHES BELOW THE RIM ELEVATION DEPICTED ON THE UTILITY PLAN. 13.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY. 14.THE CITY SHALL OPERATE ALL GATE VALVES. 15.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MANHOLES SHALL BE MADE BY CORE DRILLING THE MANHOLE AT THE PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATIONS AND INSTALLING A RUBBER BOOT. GROUT IN THE BOOT AND AN INVERT FOR THE NEW SEWER LINE. 16.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ON THE PLAN INCLUDE THE APRON SECTION. 17.WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP CLASS 52, INSTALLED WITH 7.5 FEET OF COVER TO TOP PIPE. FITTINGS SHALL BE COMPACT TYPE. PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL HAVE A CEMENT MORTAR LINING. CONDUCTIVITY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY WELDED STRAPS ACROSS EACH JOIN.T 18.TRENCH COMPACTION SHALL BE 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY IN THE AREA FROM THE PIPE ZONE TO WITHIN 3 FEET OF FINISHED GRADE AND 100% IN FINAL 3 FEET OF THE BACKFILL TO FINISH GRADE. UTILITY NOTES PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN 373PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING 3DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG!WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. UTILITY PLAN C4-1 NOTE: EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING INC., DATED 06/14/2022. C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 08 /04 / 2022 5:41 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C8-1 - CIVIL DETAILSOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY 414 NICOLLET MALL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 SHEET INDEX Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD HW TWM 08/05/22 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY CIVIL DETAILS C8-1 C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 08 /04 / 2022 5:41 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C8-1 - CIVIL DETAILSOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY 414 NICOLLET MALL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Todd W. McLouth - PE 20383 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD HW TWM 08/05/22 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY CIVIL DETAILS C8-21'-0"ACCESSIBLE ROUTE LSEE PLAN8'-0"8'-0"8'-0"9'-0" C 18'-0"C TYPICAL ADA PARKING 4" WIDE PAINTED LINES, TRAFFIC WHITE 4" WIDE PAINTED LINES, 18" O.C., @ 45 TRAFFIC WHITE (AISLE TO CONTAIN THE DESIGNATION "NO PARKING" COMPLYING WITH MSBC 1341.0502) HANDICAP SIGN (TYP) (SIGN TO COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES 1341.0502 DRAWN 12/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2036LOUCKS TC=0 GL=-0.5 TC=0 GL=0 TC=0 GL=0 TC=0 GL=-0.51'-0"ACCESSIBLE ROUTE SEE PLANHANDICAP SIGN/BOLLARD (TYP) (SIGN TO COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES 1341.0502 TC=0 GL=0 TC=0 GL=0 TC=0 GL=0 TC=0 GL=0 B612 CURB & GUTTER FLAT CURB TC=0 GL=-0.5 TC=0 GL=-0.5 TC=0 GL=-0.5 FLAT CURB B612 CURB & GUTTER B612 CURB & GUTTER FULL HEIGHT CURB WITH FLAT CURB AT ACCESS AISLE FULL HEIGHT CURB ENTIRE WIDTH OF HC STALLS 2" BIT. WEAR COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPWEA240B TACK COAT, MN/DOT 2357 2" BIT. NON-WEAR COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPNWB230B 6" AGG. BASE, CLASS 5 OR 2 MN/DOT 3138 APPROVED SUBGRADE FINISHED GRADE 24" SELECT GRANULAR, MN/DOT 3149.D STANDARD BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION PAVEMENT SECTION BASED ON GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY _____, DATED _____,20__ GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC TYPE V, MN/DOT 3733.2 DRAWN 12/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2031LOUCKS 2" BIT. WEAR COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPWEA240B TACK COAT, MN/DOT 2357 2" BIT. NON-WEAR COURSE, MN/DOT 2360 SPNWB230B 6" AGG. BASE, CLASS 5 OR 2 MN/DOT 3138 APPROVED SUBGRADE FINISHED GRADE 24" SELECT GRANULAR, MN/DOT 3149.D HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION PAVEMENT SECTION BASED ON GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY _____, DATED _____,20__ GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC TYPE V, MN/DOT 3733.2 DRAWN 12/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2032 8" COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE CL. 5 OR 2 MN/DOT 3138 APPROVED SUBGRADE FINISHED GRADE 6" CONCRETE MN/DOT 2301 CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION NOTES: 1.CONCRETE 6" THICK OR LESS SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR REINFORCING BARS. CONCRETE 7" THICK OR GREATER SHALL BE REINFORCED PER GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. 2.SAWED OR FORMED CONTROL JOINTS SHOULD BE INCLUDED FOR EACH 225 SQUARE FEET OF AREA OR LESS (15 FEET BY 15 FEET). 3.SAW CUTS SHOULD NOT CUT THROUGH THE WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR REINFORCING STEEL AND DOWELS SHOULD BE UTILIZED AT FORMED AND/OR COLD JOINTS. DRAWN 12/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2033 CONCRETE SIDEWALK SECTION 4" CONCRETE WALK MN/DOT 2521 4" COMPACTED AGG. BASE CL. 5 DRAWN 12/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2034 2 1 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW- CLASS 2 RIP RAP OVER GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AS SPEC I F I E D 6' MI N. BASIN OVERFLOW TOP OF BERM OVERFLOW ELEVATION AS SPECIFIED PONDING AREA PROTECT SLOPE WITH RIP RAP & FABRIC. AS SPECIFIED DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 3010LOUCKS LOUCKS LOUCKS LOUCKS VAN ACCESSIBLE 60" - 66"48"18" DIA.36"TYPICAL ADA PARKING SIGN / BOLLARD COMBO 12"x18" STANDARD HANDICAP PARKING SIGN WITH SEPARATE 'VAN ACCESSIBLE' PANEL. GREEN LETTERING AND BORDER ON WHITE BACKGROUND. SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY SHALL BE 4"x4" AND BE WHITE ON A BLUE BACKGROUND. USE HARDWARE PER SIGN SUPPLIER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. HC SIGNAGE PER MINNESOTA RULES 1341.0502 12"x6" STANDARD 'VAN ACCESSIBLE' PANEL. GREEN LETTERING AND BORDER ON WHITE BACKGROUND. 2" DIA. 6' LONG MIN. GALVANIZED SCHEDULE 40 STEEL PIPE. EMBED IN CONCRETE FILLED BOLLARD 6" DIA. SCHEDULE 40 GALVENZIED STEEL PIPE 6' LONG MINIMUM HEAVY DUTY HDPE DOME TOP DECORATIVE SLEEVE YELLOW IN COLOR. AVAILABLE FROM BOLLARDSNSLEEVES.COM OR EQUAL. COMPACTED OR UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE. NOTES: 1.BOLLARDS TO BE PLACED 12" BEHIND BACK OF CURB OR SIDEWALK (REFER TO SITE PLAN.) 2.MAINTAIN PLUMB UNTIL CONCRETE IS SUFFICIENTLY CURED. 3.HOLD CONCRETE FOOTING BELOW GRADE OF FINISHED CONCRETE TO CREATE FINAL PAVING PATTERN AS SHOWN ON PLANS. 4.SIGN CENTERED AT HEAD OF PARKING SPACE - MAXIMUM OF 96" FROM HEAD OF PARKING SPACE. DRAWN 03/2017 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2038ALOUCKS6"18"6"VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO A FINE OF UP TO $ 200.00 PARKINGRESERVED GRADE AT PARKING SURFACE FLAT CURB AND GUTTER (12") DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 2012LOUCKS SLOPE GUTTER TO MATCH PARKING LOT DRAINAGE TIP GUTTER OUT AS REQ'D PAVEMENT SECTION VARIES MIN. OF 4" 3/8 " LIP AGG. BASE UNDER CURB (IF TOTAL THICKNESS OF SECTION ALLOWS) 7" 12"8" AGG. BASE VARIES 1/2" RAD. 20" SPECIFICATION NOTES: 1.UPON COMPLETION, CURBING SHOULD BE SPRAYED WITH A MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND PER MNDOT 3754. 2.EXPANSION JOINTS AT MAX. SPACING OF 200'. 3.CONSTRUCT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MNDOT 2531. CONCRETE SIDEWALK- WIDTH & SECTION VARY REFER TO SITE PLAN PAVEMENT SECTION BASED ON GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY _____, DATED _____,20__ GRAVEL STREET SECTION 15" COMPACTED AGG. BASE CL. 5 DRAWN 08/2022 LOUCKS PLATE NO. CUSTOMLOUCKS PAVEMENT SECTION BASED ON GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY _____, DATED _____,20__ APPROVED SUBGRADE C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 08 /04 / 2022 5:42 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C8-1 - CIVIL DETAILSOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY 414 NICOLLET MALL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Todd W. McLouth - PE 20383 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD HW TWM 08/05/22 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY CIVIL DETAILS C8-3 OUTLET 48" 12" MIN. DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED BOTH ON THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. PRECAST MANHOLE SECTIONS PROVIDE 14" PLATE WITH LOCKING CLASP & 12" PAD LOCK HOLE. 920.0 GALVANIZED GRATE (SPLIT) 4"X4" OPENINGS POND 1 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE - WEIR/ORIFICE INLET PRECAST BASE SLAB HIGH WATER LEVEL - (EMERGENCY OVERFLOW) 930.0 1 4 6" 927.5 TOP OF WEIR ELEVATION WEIR TO BE REINFORCED WITH AT LEAST #4 REBAR, 12" ON CENTER. ORIFICE OPENING SIZE - 6"Ø INVERT ELEVATION - 924.0 WEIR/ORIFICE TOP OF WEIR ELEVATION - 927.5 ORIFICE OPENING SIZE - 6" Ø INVERT ELEVATION 924.0 DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4318 INVERT ELEVATION 919.0 12" PIPE 12" PIPE MPCA TYPE C BIOFILTRATION MIX 6" NON-PERFORATED HDPE DRAINTILE INV=A1 TOP OF WEIR ELEV=F 6" PERFORATED HDPE DRAINTILE OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE (SEE DETAIL) MPCA TYPE C BIOFILTRATION MIX IN SITU SOILS 6" DRAINTILE INV=A 6" DRAINTILE POND FILTRATION BENCH DETAIL POND & FILTRATION BENCH ELEVATION TABLE A B C D E F 918.0922.0 924.0 922.5 922.5926.9 264'264' G1 G2 H1 H2 920.0 927.5 6" DRAINTILE PLUG INV=G2 6" DRAINTILE PLUG INV=G1 A1 921.0 COMPACTED IN-SITU CLAY INV. 5" DIA. ORIFICE=I 924.4 I D-NWL OUTLET 48" 12" MIN. DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED BOTH ON THE INSIDE AND OUTSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. PRECAST MANHOLE SECTIONS PROVIDE 14" PLATE WITH LOCKING CLASP & 12" PAD LOCK HOLE. 919.0 NORMAL WATER ELEVATION GALVANIZED GRATE (SPLIT) 4"X4" OPENINGS POND 2 OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE - WEIR/ORIFICE INLET PRECAST BASE SLAB HIGH WATER LEVEL - (EMERGENCY OVERFLOW) 921.0 1 4 6" 920.6 TOP OF WEIR ELEVATION WEIR TO BE REINFORCED WITH AT LEAST #4 REBAR, 12" ON CENTER. ORIFICE OPENING SIZE - 5"Ø INVERT ELEVATION - 919.0 WEIR/ORIFICE TOP OF WEIR ELEVATION - 920.6 ORIFICE OPENING SIZE - 5" Ø INVERT ELEVATION 919.0 DRAWN 2/2016 LOUCKS PLATE NO. 4318 INVERT ELEVATION 916.0 12" PIPE 12" PIPE 6" DT - 1021.0 LOUCKS LOUCKS FENWAY BLVD NORTH12 13 14 C 11 11 1 1 11 1111 FENWAY BLVD NORTH16 16 16 8888888888888888FFE=933.0 44448888888X X X XX XX XXX X X X X X X X XXXXXX X XXXX X XX XXX X X X X X X X X XX X X XX X X XXX X XX EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TO BE SAVED (TYP.) EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE SAVED (TYP.) EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) XXX X XX X XXX XXX XXXXXXXXXXXX XX XXX X X XX XXX XXXXXXXXXX XXX X EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE SAVED (TYP.) EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) XX XX X XX X XX XXX C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 08 /04 / 2022 4:34 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\LANDSCAPE\_dwg Sheet Files\L1-1 - TREE INVENTORY PLANOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY OWNER ADDRESS Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Todd W. McLouth - PE 20383 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD HW TWM xx/xx/22 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL Nathan W. Ekhoff - LA Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 52050 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD CEF NWE xx/xx/22 C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY N SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. TREE INVENTORY PLAN L1-1 NOTES: REFER TO SHEET L1-2 FOR TREE INVENTORY LIST AND TREE PRESERVATION DETAILS. C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 08 /04 / 2022 4:34 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\LANDSCAPE\_dwg Sheet Files\L1-2 - TREE INVENTORY DETAILSOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY OWNER ADDRESS Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Todd W. McLouth - PE 20383 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD HW TWM xx/xx/22 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL Nathan W. Ekhoff - LA Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 52050 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD CEF NWE xx/xx/22 C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. TREE INVENTORY DETAILS L1-2 TREE PROTECTION LOUCKS N.T.S.Tree Protection.dwg4'-0"EXISTING GRADE TREE PROTECTION NOTE: INSTALL SNOW FENCE AROUND EACH TREE TO BE PROTECTED PRIOR TO GRADING. FENCE SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DRIP EDGE OR CRITICAL ROOT ZONES OF THE TREES. FENCING SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 6' TO THE TRUNK OF ANY TREE TO BE PROTECTED. THE PERIMETERS FOR TREES BEING PROTECTED SHALL BE DESIGNATED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL TREE PROTECTION AREAS THAT INSTRUCTS WORKERS TO STAY OUT. CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID ALL AREAS WITHIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE. SOIL SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND CHANGES IN CHEMISTRY FROM CONCRETE OR TOXIC MATERIALS SUCH AS FUELS AND PAINTS. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE "TREE PAINT" ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. IF AN OAK IS WOUNDED DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY APPLY PAINT TO THE WOUND IN ORDER TO PREVENT OAK WILT. ALL DAMAGE TO TREES TO BE PROTECTED SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT.DRIP EDGE OF TREE2" X 4" WOOD STAKE, POSITIONED AS NOTED. STRING 4' HIGH, ORANGE POLYETHYLENE LAMINAR SAFETY NETTING BETWEEN WOOD STAKES PLACED 5' ON CENTER AND PLACED BETWEEN TREE PROTECTION AND DISTURBED AREAS.DRIP EDGE OF TREEEXISTING TREE TO REMAIN NOTES: REFER TO SHEET L1-1 FOR TREE INVENTORY PLAN AND TREES THAT WILL BE REMOVED OR SAVE. 1 FENWAY BLVD NORTH12 13 14 C 11 11 1 1 11 11 FENWAY BLVD NORTH16 16 16 8888888888888888FFE=933.0 920924 928926926928919 919926 93 2936934918914924922919916914916919922918926928926928 9289269 3 0 932 933 9339 3 2929928928 932932926 928 930 930930 930 930 9309309309309 3 0930 930928 928926924 920919 920914916918919920922924920919920924.4924.4924.4924924924923923923922922922920920920918918918930 444488888889181 GL 1 QB 2 SKH 2 QB 5 TH 8 RB 1 QB 1 QB 2 SKH 5 WHP 3 WHP 4 WB 9 SGM 3 SGM 4 WB 2 WB 4 AM 57 FC 29 SG 25 AC 2 SKH 2 SKH 4 SGM 2 WHP 3 WHP 3 WHP 2 WHP 3 AE 7 GL 4 AE 42 GF 14 SG 4 GB 20 GF 10 GF 12 GF 8 SKH 8 GF 8 GF 8 GF 14 GF 12 GF 12 GF 12 GF 12 GF IRRIGATION LIMITS (TYP.) IRRIGATION LIMITS (TYP.) EXISTING TREES (TYP.) EXISTING TREES (TYP.) LANDSCAPE EDGING (TYP.) LANDSCAPE EDGING (TYP.) WOOD MULCH (TYP.) STONE MULCH (TYP.) NO MOW GRASS SEED (TYP.) SOD (TYP.) WETLAND SEED MIX (TYP.) WETLAND SEED MIX (TYP.) SOD (TYP.) NO MOW GRASS SEED (TYP.) SOD (TYP.) STONE MULCH (TYP.) WETLAND SEED MIX (TYP.) NO MOW GRASS SEED (TYP.) C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 08 /04 / 2022 4:35 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\LANDSCAPE\_dwg Sheet Files\L2-1 - LANDSCAPE PLANOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY OWNER ADDRESS Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Todd W. McLouth - PE 20383 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD HW TWM xx/xx/22 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL Nathan W. Ekhoff - LA Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 52050 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD CEF NWE xx/xx/22 C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY N SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG!WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. GENERAL NOTES: CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID. HE SHALL INSPECT SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. VERIFY LAYOUT AND ANY DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ANY DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN AND / OR INTENT OF THE PROJECT'S LAYOUT. ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK OR MATERIALS SUPPLIED. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING ROADS, CURBS / GUTTERS, TRAILS, TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. ANY DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR THE UTILITIES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION / MATERIAL INSTALLATION BEGINS. CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF ANY CONCERNS PRIOR TO INSTALLATION OF PLANTINGS. EXISTING CONTOURS, TRAILS, VEGETATION, CURB / GUTTER AND OTHER EXISTING ELEMENTS BASED UPON INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ANY AND ALL DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS, TRAILS AND / OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL AND GRADING. ANY CHANGE IN ALIGNMENT MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. REFER TO SHEET L3-1 FOR PLANTING SCHEDULE, PLANTING NOTES, AND PLANTING DETAILS. IRRIGATION NOTES: VERIFY EXISTING / PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM LAYOUT AND CONFIRM COMPLETE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION PRIOR TO SUPPLYING SHOP DRAWINGS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION AS A PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING. THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO ORDER AND / OR INSTALLATION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT ALL SODDED / SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS NOT TO SPRINKLE ACROSS PAVEMENT NOR SHALL THE SYSTEM SPRINKLE THE BUILDING. THE SYSTEM SHALL INCORPORATE A RAIN SENSOR INTO IRRIGATION SYSTEM. PLANTINGS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION ARE TO BE WATERED REGULARLY UNTIL PLANTING / SOD / SEED HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: ONE (1) OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS SHADE TREE FOR EVERY 2,000 SF OF TOTAL BUILDING AREA OR ONE (1) TREE FOR EVERY 100 FEET OF SITE PERIMETER - WHICHEVER IS GREATER. - 70,430 / 2,000 SF = 36 SHADE TREES - 4,646 / 100 FEET = 47 SHADE TREES ONE (1) CONIFEROUS TREE FOR EVERY 2,000 SF OF BUILDING OR ONE (1) CONIFEROUS TREE FOR EVERY 200 FEET OF SITE PERIMETER - WHICHEVER IS GREATER. - 70,430 / 2,000 SF = 36 CONIFEROUS TREES - 4,646 / 200 FEET = 24 CONIFEROUS TREES ONE (1) ORNAMENTAL TREE FOR EVERY 2,000 SF OF BUILDING OR ONE (1) ORNAMENTAL FOR EVERY 200 FEET OF SITE PERIMETER - WHICHEVER IS GREATER. - 70,430 / 2,000 SF = 36 ORNAMENTAL TREES - 4,646 / 200 FEET = 24 ORNAMENTAL TREES ONE (1) SHRUB FOR EVERY 300 SF OF BUILDING OR ONE (1) SHRUBS FOR EVERY 30 FEET OF SITE PERIMETER - WHICHEVER IS GREATER. - 70,430 / 300 SF = 235 SHRUBS - 4,646 / 30 FEET = 155 SHRUBS SCREENING FOR PARKING ALONG FRONTAGE - MUST AVERAGE ONE (1) EVERGREEN OR SHADE TREE PER 30 FEET OF PERIMETER FRONTAGE. - 919 LF / 30 FEET = 31 TREES* TREES REQUIRED - 31 TREES TREES PROVIDED -56 TREES TREE SUMMARY SHADE TREES REQUIRED:47 SHADE TREES PROVIDED:185 EXISTING SHADE TREES:117 PROPOSED SHADE TREES:68 CONIFEROUS TREES REQUIRED:36 CONIFEROUS TREES PROVIDED:36 EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREES:18 PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREES:18 ORNAMENTAL TREES REQUIRED:36 ORNAMENTAL TREES PROVIDED:15 EXISTING ORNAMENTAL TREES:0 PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREES:15 SHRUBS REQUIRED:235 SHRUBS PROVIDED:441 EXISTING SHRUBS:146 PROPOSED SHRUBS:295 * THE SCREENING REQUIREMENT IS INCLUDED WITHIN THE REQUIRED TREES PROVIDED ABOVE. LANDSCAPE PLAN L2-1 DECIDUOUS TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE AE 7 ACCOLADE ELM Ulmus `Morton`B & B 2.5"Cal AM 4 ARMSTRONG MAPLE Acer freemanii `Armstrong`B & B 2.5"Cal GB 4 GINKGO TREE MALE NON-FRUITING Ginkgo biloba B & B 2.5"Cal GL 8 GREENSPIRE LINDEN Tilia cordata `Greenspire`B & B 2.5"Cal RB 8 RIVER BIRCH CLUMP Betula nigra B & B 8` HGT SGM 16 SIENNA GLEN MAPLE Acer freemanii `Sienna Glen`B & B 2.5"Cal SKH 16 SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos `Skycole`B & B 2.5"Cal QB 5 SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor B & B 2.5"Cal EVERGREEN TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE WHP 18 WHITE PINE FULL FORM Pinus strobus B & B 6` HGT ORNAMENTAL TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE TH 5 THORNLESS HAWTHORN Crataegus crus-galli `Inermis`B & B 1.5"Cal WB 10 WHITESPIRE BIRCH CLUMP Betula populifolia `Whitespire Sr.`B & B 8` HGT SHRUBS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE SPACING AC 25 AUTUMN MAGIC CHOKEBERRY Aronia melanocarpa `Magic Carpet`5 gal 24" HGT 48" o.c. FC 57 GOLD TIDE FORSYTHIA Forsythia x `Courtasol` TM 5 gal 42" o.c. GF 170 GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC Rhus aromatica `Gro-Low`5 gal 24" SPRD 48" o.c. CONIFEROUS SHRUBS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE SPACING SG 43 SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus chinensis `Sea Green`5 gal 18" SPRD 60" o.c. GROUND COVERS CODE COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME SEED 3 NO MOW GRASS SEED REFER TO SPEC SECTION 32-9219 SEED MIX BY PRAIRIE NURSERY OR EQUAL SM-1 STONE MULCH WASHED GREY TRAP ROCK 2.5" INSTALLED OVER FABRIC SM-2 STONE MULCH-TRAP ROCK GRAY TRAP ROCK ROCK 3"-6" RIP RAP" 3" DEPTH SOD TURF SOD SEED 4 WETLAND SEED MIX REFER TO SPEC SECTION 32-9219 BWSR SEED MIX 34-261 RIPARIAN SOUTH AND WEST WM-1 WOOD MULCH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH PLANT SCHEDULE C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 08 /04 / 2022 4:35 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\LANDSCAPE\_dwg Sheet Files\L3-1 - LANDSCAPE DETAILSOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY OWNER ADDRESS Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Todd W. McLouth - PE 20383 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD HW TWM xx/xx/22 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL Nathan W. Ekhoff - LA Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 52050 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD CEF NWE xx/xx/22 C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY GENERAL NOTES COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS. REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELS FROM PLANTS. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS CONCERNED OR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT, SURVIVAL OR GUARANTEE, HE MUST BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT AND / OR INSTALLATION. PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES ON SITE SCHEDULED TO REMAIN. IF EXISTING TREES ARE DAMAGED IN ANY MANNER, ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND IN THE ROOT SYSTEM, AN ASPHALTIC TREE PRUNING PAINT SHOULD BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY AFTER WOUNDING. SOIL & GROUNDCOVER ALL PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER, PERENNIALS, ANNUALS, AND / OR VINES SHALL RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, 45 PARTS PEAT OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND. WHERE SOD / SEED ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD / SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB, CURB, ETC. SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING OTHER THAN THOSE AREAS NOTED TO RECEIVE SOD. SEED SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MULCHED AS PER MNDOT SPECS. SOD ALL DESIGNATED AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS. ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE SWALES, THE SOD SHALL BE STAKED TO THE GROUND. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT SOIL AND COMPACTION CONDITIONS ARE ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AT AND AROUND THE BUILDING SITE. PLANTINGS INFO ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED MINIMUM SHRUB HEIGHT OR WIDTH. ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO V CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 3' ABOVE ROOT BALL. STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER THAN 5' ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. ANY CONIFEROUS TREE PREVIOUSLY PRUNED FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES SHALL NOT BE USED. ALL CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL BE FULL FORM, NATURAL TO THE SPECIES, WITHOUT PRUNING. PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR / ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR / ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR / ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ADJUSTMENTS IN LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE ADVISED, THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED. PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID AND / OR QUOTATION. WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE CORRUGATED PVC PIPING 1" GREATER IN CALIPER THAN THE TREE BEING PROTECTED OR QUALITY, HEAVY, WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO 12-1 AND REMOVE ALL WRAPPING AFTER 5-1. FERTILIZER ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH A 27-3-3 SLOW RELEASE FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. PLANTS MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR 27-3-3 AT 6 OZ PER 2.5" CALIPER PER TREE AND 3 OZ PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION OF 27-3-3 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER. EDGING FOR PLANTING BEDS BLACK METAL EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, AND ANNUALS WHERE BED MEETS SOD / SEED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. PLANTING BED PREPARATION ALL ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD /STONE MULCH WITH NO WEED BARRIER. ALL SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD / STONE MULCH AND FIBER MAT WEED BARRIER. ALL TREES NOT IN PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD / STONE MULCH RING WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. SPREAD GRANULAR PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE (PREEN OR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS UNDER ALL MULCHED AREAS. MAINTENANCE STRIPS TO HAVE EDGER AND MULCH AS SPECIFIED / INDICATED ON DRAWING OR IN SPECIFICATION. INSPECTION AND WARRANTY CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION OF ALL LANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ON-GOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM INCLUDING, BUT NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, PRUNING, FERTILIZATION AND DISEASE / PEST CONTROL. CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE (1) CALENDAR YEAR FROM THE DATE OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. WARRANTY (ONE (1) FULL GROWING SEASON) FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BEGIN ON THE DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PLANTING OF ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. TIMING OF INSTALLATION UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION AND SEED / SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15. FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15 - NOVEMBER 1. FALL SEEDING FROM AUGUST 15 - SEPTEMBER 15; DORMANT SEEDING IN THE FALL SHALL NOT OCCUR PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1. FALL CONIFEROUS PLANTING MAY OCCUR FROM AUGUST 15 - OCTOBER 1 AND DECIDUOUS PLANTING FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. PLANTING OUTSIDE THESE DATES IS NOT RECOMMENDED. ANY ADJUSTMENT MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. TREES ARE NOT TO BE PRUNED, REMOVED OR TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN APRIL 15 AND JULY 1. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF THESE DATES ARE UNAVOIDABLE. REFER TO SHEET L2-1 FOR LANDSCAPE DATA, PLANTING PLAN, GENERAL NOTES, AND IRRIGATION NOTES. LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION: LOUCKS Deciduous Tree Planting.dwgSCALE: N.T.S. 2x ROOT BALL WIDTH NOTE: CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS. DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING EDGE VARIES WOOD STAKE BACKFILL WITH IN SITU TOPSOIL MULCH - 4" DEEP. NO MULCH IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK - SEE NOTES OR SPECS. ROOT FLARE EVEN WITH OR JUST ABOVE GRADE SAFETY FLAGGING - ONE PER WIRE TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH 16"X2" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE STRAP NOTES: THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGH THE WARRANTY PERIOD. STAKING IS SUGGESTED, BUT NOT REQUIRED. ANY STAKING MUST CONFORM WITH PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN A.N.A. GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD PRACTICES. PRUNE DAMAGED AND CROSSING BRANCHES AFTER PLANTING IS COMPLETE. CUT BACK WIRE BASKET. WATER TREE THOROUGHLY DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. PLACE BACKFILL IN 8-12" LIFTS AND SATURATE SOIL WITH WATER. DO NOT COMPACT MORE THAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PLUMB. 1 CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING LOUCKS Coniferous Tree Planting.dwgSCALE: N.T.S. 2 x ROOT BALL WIDTH NOTE: CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS. ROOT BALL SET ON UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING EDGE VARIES - SEE PLAN WOOD STAKE (OPTIONAL) BACKFILL WITH IN SITU TOPSOIL MULCH - 4" DEEP - SEE NOTES OR SPECS. MULCH MUST NOT BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. SAFETY FLAGGING - ONE PER WIRE 16" x2" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE STRAP NOTES: THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION THROUGH THE WARRANTY PERIOD. STAKING IS SUGGESTED, BUT NOT REQUIRED. ANY STAKING MUST CONFORM WITH PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN A.N.A. GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD PRACTICES. PRUNE ANY DAMAGED BRANCHES AFTER PLANTING IS COMPLETE. WATER TREE THOROUGHLY DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. PLACE BACKFILL IN 8-12" LIFTS AND SATURATE SOIL WITH WATER. DO NOT COMPACT MORE THAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PLUMB. 2 REFER TO PLAN 18" MIN. LOOSEN ROOTS OF ALL CONTAINERIZED PLANTS. SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTINGBUILDING WALL (TYP)SHRUB PLANTING LOUCKS Shrub Planting.dwgSCALE: N.T.S. EDGE VARIES - REFER TO PLAN EDGING MATERIAL - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. LANDSCAPE FABRIC - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. MULCH - 3" DEPTH - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. PLANTING SOIL - SEE NOTES OR SPEC. SHRUBS TO BE PLACED SO THAT TOP OF CONTAINER SITS FLUSH WITH PROPOSED GRADE 3 VARIES SEE PLAN NOTE: LOOSEN ROOTS OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO PLANTING PERENNIAL PLANTING LOUCKS Perennial Planting.dwgSCALE: N.T.S.BUILDING WALL (TYP)12" DEPTH (MIN) LOAM PLANTING SOIL SEE NOTES EDGE VARIES - REFER TO PLAN EDGING MATERIAL - SEE NOTES MULCH - 3" MIN. DEPTH - SEE NOTES 4 LANDSCAPE DETAILS L3-1 FENWAY BLVD NORTHFENWAY BLVD NORTH416 16 11 6 16 16 16 16 16 9 14 122 20 20 20 20 11 27 4 10 5 161 61 POND 1 NWL=924.0 HWL=926.7 BTM=918.0 POND 2 NWL=919.0 HWL=920.7 BTM=914.0 FFE=933.0 7 12 24.0' 9.0' TYP 18.0' TYP B612 C&G (TYP.) 24.0' 9.0' TYP 18.0' TYP 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 18.0' TYP 18.0' TYP 32.0'24.0' 10.0' 24.0' 9.0' TYP 18.0' TYP 10.0' CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) MATCH EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT ADA SIGN TYP SEE DETAIL TYPICAL ADA PARKING STALLS SEE DETAIL 47.4' 47.4' 24.0' 9.0' TYP 18.0' TYP 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 24.0' 25.0' 5.0' 10.5' B612 C&G (TYP.) 33.0' PROPOSED SUBSTATION AREA PROJECT PROPOSED IN-PROCESSING BUILDING PROJECT GRAVEL PARKING AREA PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINES (SEE PLANS PREPARED BY OTHERS) 24' TYP 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R5'R5'R5'R 25'R 25'R 5'R 20'R 26'R 23'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 50'R 50'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 20'R 10'R 15'R 15'R 10'R 44'R 15'R 25'R 25'R 50'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 4.5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 5'R 4.5'R 4.5'R 4.5'R 4.5'R 4.5'R CONCRETE APRON SEE CITY DETAIL 24.0' PROPOSED IN-PROCESSING BUILDING CONCRETE PAVEMENT FUTURE SOLAR TRAINING AREA FLAT CURB FLAT CURB 18.0' PATIO FUTURE WIND TURBINE TRAINING AREA PROPOSED FENCE AND GATE TO MATCH EXISTING PROPOSED SUBSTATION SEE PLANS PREPARED BY OTHERS PROPOSED TRAINING AREAPROPOSED SUBSTATION AREACONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.) POLE HEIGHT=85' POLE HEIGHT=79' POLE HEIGHT=70' POLE HEIGHT=70' POLE HEIGHT=105' POLE HEIGHT=57' POLE HEIGHT=43' POLE HEIGHT=48' POLE HEIGHT=55' POLE HEIGHT=61' POLE HEIGHT=62' POLE HEIGHT=52' POLE HEIGHT=64' POLE HEIGHT=57' POLE HEIGHT=61' POLE HEIGHT=83' POLE HEIGHT=57' POLE HEIGHT=52' POLE HEIGHT=52' POLE HEIGHT=52' POLE HEIGHT=57' POLE HEIGHT=57' POLE HEIGHT=66' POLE HEIGHT=71' POLE HEIGHT=52' PROOF OF PARKING (TYP) C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 11 /07 / 2022 10:3 AMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C2-1 - SITE PLANOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY 414 NICOLLET MALL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL 08/09/22 PLAN REVISION 11/07/22 PROOF OF PARKING Nathan W. Ekhoff - LA Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the State of Minnesota. 52050 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD CEF NWE 08/09/22 C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY N SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 1.ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. 2.ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA STANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS. 3.ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4.ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5.TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9' X 18' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 6.ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 5.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 7.SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING. 8.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN FOR BUILDING SETBACKS. DENOTES CONCRETE PAVEMENT DENOTES HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT DENOTES LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SITE NOTES PAVEMENT LEGEND PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN 373PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING 3DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 WARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! SITE PLAN C2-1 CURRENT ZONING:BUSINESS PARK PROPOSED ZONING:BUSINESS PARK PROPERTY AREA:1,226,373 SF / ±28.1 AC PROPOSED BUILDING AREA:70,488 sf / ±1.6 ac (5.7%) ALLOWED UP TO 40% PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA:514,677 sf / ±11.8 ac (41.9%) ALLOWED UP TO 80% SITE DATA CODE REQUIRED PARKING FOR PROPOSED BUILDING 34,740 OFFICE BUILDING / 200 =173 PARKING STALLS 6200 TRAINING LABS / 500 =13 PARKING STALLS TOTAL =186 PARKING STALLS PROPOSED PARKING PROVIDED EXISTING STALLS REMOVED =22 PROOF OF PARKING =110 PROPOSED STALLS =229 NEW TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED =317 OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT 30 FT MINIMUM SIDE EQUAL TO HEIGHT OF BUILDING (NOT LESS THAN 10 FT) MINIMUM REAR 30 FT MINIMUM OFF-STREET PARKING AND DESIGN STANDARD REQUIREMENTS OFF-STREET PARKING SETBACKS: FRONT 10 FT MINIMUM SIDE 5 FT MINIMUM REAR 5 FT MINIMUM MINIMUM PARKING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS (90 DEGREE PATTERN): PARKING SPACE WIDTH = 9 FT PARKING SPACE LENGTH = 18 FT DRIVE LANE WIDTH = 24 FT DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS NOTE: EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING INC., DATED 06/14/2022. DENOTES GRAVEL PAVEMENT WB-67 - Interstate Semi-Trailerxxxxxxxxx932.529.528.521.021.021.021.021.021.0x920.6x32.0x31.0x29.5x29.5PONDNWL=924.0HWL=926.9BTM=918.0932.1932.0-0.2%932.0930.6-7.6%930.6931.02.0%931.0931.00.0%931.0931.00.0%931.0931.00.0%931.0931.50.4%931.5931.0-0.4%931.0930.6-2.0%930.6930.6-0.1%930.6930.5-0.1%930.5930.0-0.7%930.0930.21.0%930.2930.41.0%930.4931.51.0%931.5931.1-2.0%931.1931.10.0%931.1931.52.0%931.5931.50.0%931.5931.1-2.0%931.1932.03.1%932.0931.8-0.3%931.8932.22.0%932.2932.0-0.3%932.0931.9-0.3%931.9931.7-0.3%931.7931.7-0.3%931.7931.2-0.3%931.2931.20.2%931.2931.50.2%931.3930.6-0.8%930.6930.5-0.8%930.5930.50.0%930.5929.0-1.3%929.0930.51.7%930.5930.70.7%931.52.7%931.5930.9-1.4%930.7931.50.6%931.5931.4-0.7%931.4931.0-2.0%931.0930.3-0.8%932.7932.1-0.7%933.0932.7-1.1%932.7932.70.0%932.7932.70.0%932.7932.1-0.7%932.1932.10.0%932.1932.10.0%932.1932.10.0%932.1932.10.0%932.1932.10.0%933.0933.00.0%933.0933.00.0%933.0933.00.0%933.0933.00.0%933.0933.00.0%933.0933.00.0%933.0933.00.0%933.0933.00.0%933.00.0%933.00.0%930.0929.5-1.3%929.5929.0-0.4%929.0929.51.7%931.0930.1-0.5%931.0929.0-2.8%929.0929.91.3%931.0930.0-1.5%930.0930.50.7%931.5930.0-2.2%930.0930.81.1%931.5930.0-2.1%930.0931.01.4%931.5930.3-1.5%931.52.7%931.5930.9-1.4%930.7931.50.6%931.5931.4-0.7%931.4931.0-2.0%931.0930.3-0.8%930.3931.50.6%931.5931.0-0.6%931.0930.6-2.0%930.6932.02.8%932.1932.0-0.2%932.0930.6-7.6%930.6931.02.0%931.0931.00.0%931.0931.00.0%931.0931.00.0%931.0931.50.4%931.5931.0-0.4%931.0930.6-2.0%930.6930.6-0.1%930.6930.5-0.1%930.5930.0-0.7%930.0930.21.0%930.2930.41.0%930.4931.51.0%931.5931.1-2.0%931.1931.10.0%931.1931.52.0%931.5931.50.0%931.5931.1-2.0%931.1932.03.1%932.0931.8-0.3%931.8932.22.0%932.2932.0-0.3%932.0931.9-0.3%931.9931.7-0.3%931.7931.7-0.3%931.7931.2-0.3%931.2931.20.2%931.2931.50.2%931.3930.6-0.8%930.6930.5-0.8%930.5930.50.0%930.5929.0-1.3%929.0930.51.7%930.5930.70.7%930.7931.30.8%931.3931.60.4%931.6931.5-0.3%931.5931.3-0.3%931.3931.3-0.3%931.3931.3-0.3%931.2931.1-0.3%931.1-0.3%OWNERARCHITECTRSP Architects, Ltd.1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolis, MN 55413Phone: 612.677.7100Fax: 612.677.7499Dave Norback, PrincipalPhone:612.677.7100Email:dave.norback@rsparch.comGordon Strom, Project Architect/ManagerPhone:612.677.7344Email:Gordon.Strom@rsparch.comLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTLOUCKS7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369JonathanDonovan, Principal Civil EngineerPhone: 763.496.6724Cell: 612.237.8569 Email: JDonovan@loucksinc.comXcel Energy 414 Nicollet Mall, Mezzanine, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Zachary Mahlum, Project Lead –Project Tenant Services Phone: 612.330.5547 Email: Zachary.Mahlum@xcelenergy.comProject ForSheet Issues / RevisionsProject No.Drawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2019. All rights reserved.Consultants1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP Architects7/29/2022 11:39:08 AMC:\Users\rpomerleau\Documents\A21_ Hugo_Nuclear InProcessing_razieh.pomerleau.rvtCOVER SHEET6263.315.03RDPGS08/05/22Xcel EnergyHugo NuclearIn-ProcessingG000DOCUMENT PACKAGESHEET INDEXPROJECT TEAMCODE SUMMARYLOCATION MAPKEY PLANISSUED:ISSUED:ISSUED:ISSUED:August 05. 2022PACKAGE:PACKAGE:PACKAGE:PACKAGE:Preliminary City SubmittalPROJECT NUMBER:Xcel EnergyHugo Nuclear In-Processing13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 550386263.315.03PROJECT LOCATIONNo.DateDescription UPUPA4012A4014A4011A40132316 SFTRAINING 2GASWELDING2217 SFTRAINING 3/ COMPUTERROOM1172 SFESOM CLASSROOM374 SFNURSESSTATIONADAREST.RESTRESTREST131 SFEVAL130 SFEVAL130 SFOFFICE130 SFOFFICE185 SFOFFICE174 SFSTOR2314 SFTRAINING 1CLASSROOMOFFICECOFFEESTOR.GAS1237 SFENTRY117 SFEVAL299 SFPANTRY/VEND348 SFWOMENS340 SFMENS1259 SFBREAK117 SFSCHED.JAN499 SFFIREWATCH/DRESSOUT693 SFGAS SIMULATOR1450 SFRIGGING&TRAINING601 SFLABRESTRESTUNISEX168' - 6"22' - 6"15' - 8"56' - 3"262' - 11"94' - 0 1/2"2' - 0 1/2"4' - 0"6' - 4 1/2"2' - 0"4' - 4 1/2"90' - 0"41' - 2"9' - 0"39' - 10"Project ForSheet Issues / RevisionsProject No.Drawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2019. All rights reserved.Consultants1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP Architects7/29/2022 11:35:13 AMC:\Users\rpomerleau\Documents\A21_ Hugo_Nuclear InProcessing_razieh.pomerleau.rvtFIRST FLOOR PLAN6263.315.03RDPGS08/05/22Xcel EnergyHugo NuclearIn-ProcessingA1013/32" = 1'-0"101 -FIRST FLOOR PLANNNo.DateDescriptionPLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW UPA4012A4014A4011A4013635 SFMECH.172 SFELEC.238 SFIT1053 SFCLASSROOM 1949 SFCLASS ROOM 2945 SFCLASSROOM 3945 SFCLASSROOM 4945 SFCLASSROOM 5194 SFUTILITY426 SFBREAK120 SFOFFICE120 SFOFFICE116 SFOFFICE116 SFOFFICE120 SFOFFICE120 SFOFFICE120 SFOFFICE120 SFOFFICE120 SFOFFICE120 SFOFFICESTORAGE253 SFMED. CONF349 SFWOMENS340 SFMENSMOTHERS2756 SFOPEN OFFICECOPY1486 SFPREFUNCTIONJAN114 SFOFFICE117 SFOFFICE263' - 4 1/2"168' - 11 1/2"22' - 6"15' - 8"56' - 3"94' - 0 1/2"2' - 0 1/2"4' - 0"42' - 0"8' - 6 1/2"39' - 10"90' - 4 1/2"MECHANICAL UNITSMECHANICAL SCREENINGProject ForSheet Issues / RevisionsProject No.Drawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2019. All rights reserved.Consultants1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP Architects7/29/2022 11:35:15 AMC:\Users\rpomerleau\Documents\A21_ Hugo_Nuclear InProcessing_razieh.pomerleau.rvtSECOND FLOOR PLAN6263.315.03RDPGS08/05/22Xcel EnergyHugo NuclearIn-ProcessingA1023/32" = 1'-0"102 -SECOND FLOOR PLANPLANNING AND ZONING REVIEWNNo.DateDescription 01 -FIRST FLOOREL= 100' -0"02 -SECOND FLOOREL= 118' -0"ROOFEL= 136' -0"27' - 0"11' - 0"24' - 6"6' - 0"24' - 0"11' - 0"25' - 10"30' - 5"15' - 0"23' - 2"13' - 9"130' - 5"11' - 3"13' - 1"71' - 3"192' - 1 1/2"10' - 6"8' - 0"8' - 6"3' - 1"6' - 6"1' - 5"METAL SUNSHADE STRUCTURETEXTURED PRECAST PANELS WITH SCORE PATTERNCOLOR: PEWTERMETAL PANEL EQUIPMENT SCREENTEXTURED PRECAST PANELS WITH SCORE PATTERNCOLOR: OUTBACKTRANSLUCENT CLERESTORY WINDOWSMETAL PANELSALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEMWOOD LOOK METAL PANEL SYSTEMPUNCHED WINDOW OPENINGSMAIN VISITOR ENTRANCESPANDREL PANELSSPANDREL PANELSIGN01 -FIRST FLOOREL= 100' -0"02 -SECOND FLOOREL= 118' -0"24' - 0"8' - 0"5' - 0"11' - 0"94' - 0"27' - 11"50' - 10"15' - 3"METAL PANEL EQUIPMENT SCREENTEXTURED PRECAST PANELS WITH SCORE PATTERNCOLOR: OUTBACKTRANSLUCENT CLERESTORY WINDOWSH.M. DOOR AND FRAME10"X10" OVERHEAD DOOR10"X10" OVERHEAD DOORENTRANCE TO GAS WELDING AREA01 -FIRST FLOOREL= 100' -0"02 -SECOND FLOOREL= 118' -0"ROOFEL= 136' -0"41' - 11 1/2"8' - 6 1/2"40' - 3 1/4"27' - 0"11' - 0"24' - 6"3' - 2"35' - 1"3' - 8 1/2"10' - 6"8' - 0"8' - 6"3' - 1"6' - 6"1' - 5"METAL SUNSHADE STRUCTURETEXTURED PRECAST PANELS WITH SCORE PATTERNCOLOR: PEWTERALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEMWOOD LOOK METAL PANEL SYSTEMPUNCHED WINDOW OPENINGSMETAL PANELSSOUTH EMPLOYEE ENTRANCEH.M. DOOR AND FRAMESPANDREL PANEL01 -FIRST FLOOREL= 100' -0"02 -SECOND FLOOREL= 118' -0"ROOFEL= 136' -0"2' - 8"116' - 9"11' - 2"38' - 4 1/2"192' - 1 1/2"71' - 2 1/2"23' - 2"15' - 0"30' - 5"25' - 9 1/2"11' - 0"5' - 0"8' - 0"6' - 0"24' - 0"6' - 0"24' - 6"1' - 5"6' - 6"3' - 1"8' - 6"8' - 0"10' - 6"38' - 0"METAL SUNSHADE STRUCTURETEXTURED PRECAST PANELS WITH SCORE PATTERNCOLOR: PEWTERMETAL PANEL EQUIPMENT SCREENTEXTURED PRECAST PANELS WITH SCORE PATTERNCOLOR: OUTBACKMETAL PANELSALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEMWOOD LOOK METAL PANEL SYSTEMPUNCHED WINDOW OPENINGSSPANDREL PANELSPANDREL PANELBREAK ROOM ENTRANCEProject ForSheet Issues / RevisionsProject No.Drawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2019. All rights reserved.Consultants1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP Architects7/29/2022 11:35:19 AMC:\Users\rpomerleau\Documents\A21_ Hugo_Nuclear InProcessing_razieh.pomerleau.rvtEXTERIOR ELEVATIONS6263.315.03RDPGS08/05/22Xcel EnergyHugo NuclearIn-ProcessingA401PLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW3/32" = 1'-0"1ELEVATION -EAST3/32" = 1'-0"2ELEVATION -NORTH3/32" = 1'-0"3ELEVATION -SOUTH3/32" = 1'-0"4ELEVATION -WESTNo.DateDescription Project ForSheet Issues / RevisionsProject No.Drawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2019. All rights reserved.Consultants1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP Architects7/29/2022 11:35:19 AMC:\Users\rpomerleau\Documents\A21_ Hugo_Nuclear InProcessing_razieh.pomerleau.rvt3D VIEWS6263.315.03RDPGS08/05/22Xcel EnergyHugo NuclearIn-ProcessingA601PLANNING AND ZONING REVIEWNORTHEAST CORNERSOUTHEAST CORNERNo.DateDescription Project ForSheet Issues / RevisionsProject No.Drawn ByChecked ByDateNOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied, duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants, contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice.© Copyright RSP Architects 2019. All rights reserved.Consultants1220 Marshall Street NEMinneapolisMinnesota 55413-1036612.677.7100612.677.7499 faxwww.rsparch.comRSP Architects7/29/2022 11:35:20 AMC:\Users\rpomerleau\Documents\A21_ Hugo_Nuclear InProcessing_razieh.pomerleau.rvt3D VIEWS6263.315.03RDPGS08/05/22Xcel EnergyHugo NuclearIn-ProcessingA602NORTHEAST CORNERSOUTHEAST CORNERSOUTHWEST CORNERNORTHWEST CORNERPLANNING AND ZONING REVIEWNo.DateDescription S:\Community Development\LGU\WCA 2022\22.15 Xcel Energy 13620 Fenway Blvd\Replacement Plan\MEMO_HugoCityCouncil_XcelHTCWetlandReplacement_111122.docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Tom Weidt, City of Hugo Mayor Becky Petryk, City of Hugo Council Member Phil Klein, City of Hugo Council Member David Strub, City of Hugo Council Member Mike Miron, City of Hugo Council Member CC: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director From: Alison Harwood, WSB Date: November 11, 2022 Re: City Project No. 22.15 Xcel Energy Wetland Replacement WSB Project No. 019629-00 This memo has been drafted regarding Xcel Energy’s application to impact and replace wetlands as part of an expansion project for their Hugo Training Facility. Zachary Mahlum, for Xcel Energy, submitted a MN joint application for activities affecting water resources in Minnesota requesting approval for wetland impact sequencing and replacement. The application was considered complete on September 27, 2022, and a subsequent notice of application was issued on October 3, 2022. The TEP provided comments on the application, which the applicant subsequently responded to. The purpose of the project is to provide improved training facilities for gas, electrical, and nuclear operators and improve in-processing for planned nuclear plant maintenance outages A wetland boundary and type application was approved on September 9, 2022 which identified two (2) wetland basins within the project area. Wetland 1 is a small (0.39 acres) farmed Type 2 wetland, while W etland 2 is a large shrub/wooded swamp wetland, only a small portion of which exists on the subject property. Wetlands 1 and 2 provide the following wetland functions: •Surface water detention •Nutrient Transformation •Carbon Sequestration •Sediment and Particulate Retention •Other Wildlife Habitat Several alternatives were considered for this project as part of the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) sequencing requirement. The first was the no-build alternative. This was rejected as it would not accomplish the purpose of providing the improved training or in-processing facilities. The second was to add onto the existing building. This was rejected as it was cost-prohibitive. The third was to design a 2-cell system for stormwater management. This was rejected as it would not meet City stormwater requirements and would reduce or eliminate hydrology to the wetland. The fourth was to move the stormwater pond to elsewhere on the property but was rejected as no alternative areas were available that weren’t already proposed for other facilities. The fifth was to utilize a different property but that would negate the comprehensive safety/training aspect of the development. The sixth and preferred alternative locates the new G.10 Hugo City Council November 11, 2022 Page 2 S:\Community Development\LGU\WCA 2022\22.15 Xcel Energy 13620 Fenway Blvd\Replacement Plan\MEMO_HugoCityCouncil_XcelHTCWetlandReplacement_111122.docx building and associated parking lot in the northeast corner of the parcel. The transmission line and substation training facilities are located throughout the central and northwest portions of the site. A stormwater management pond is proposed immediately west of the new building and parking area to provide stormwater management for the new impervious. This would provide the comprehensive training needed by Xcel and provides an effective in-processing facility to facilitate nuclear plant maintenance outages. This alternative would require impacts (excavation) to wetland 1. The total amount of impact to W etland 1 using the preferred alternative is 0.39 acres. This amount of impact must be replaced and is proposed to be replaced using wetland bank credits. The required wetland replacement ratio is 2.5:1; however, the proposed wetland bank is within the same bank service area (BSA) 7, which allows a reduction of 0.5:1; resulting in a required replacement ration of 2:1. The proposed wetland bank is bank #1722 which is located within the same BSA and major watershed (Mississippi River-Metro). A total of 0.78 acres of wetland credit are proposed to be withdrawn from this bank to meet the required 2:1 replacement ration. It is important to note, that while the proposed wetland replacement meets rule requirements, wetland functions identified for W etland 1 will be permanently lost within the City of Hugo. Special considerations required to be considered as part of the application process have been addressed and no impacts to these considerations have been identified by the applicant. Based on the application materials submitted by the applicant and subsequent review of those materials against MN Rule 8420, the WCA, the applicant has met all of the rule requirements for wetland impact sequencing and replacement. The TEP recommends approval of this application for wetland impacts sequencing and replacement. Application materials and site plans are attached to this memo. BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 1 Minnesota Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Decision Local Government Unit: City of Hugo County: Washington Applicant Name: Zachary Mahlum, Xcel Energy Applicant Representative: Danny Margarit, Carlson McCain Project Name: Oneka Elementary LGU Project No. (if any): 22.15 Date Complete Application Received by LGU: September 27, 2022 Date of LGU Decision: TBD Date this Notice was Sent: TBD WCA Decision Type - check all that apply ☐ Wetland Boundary/Type ☐ Sequencing ☒ Replacement Plan ☐ Bank Plan (not credit purchase) ☐ No-Loss (8420.0415) ☐ Exemption (8420.0420) Part: ☐ A ☐ B ☐ C ☐ D ☐ E ☐ F ☐ G ☐ H Subpart: ☐ 2 ☐ 3 ☐ 4 ☐ 5 ☐ 6 ☐ 7 ☐ 8 ☐ 9 Replacement Plan Impacts (replacement plan decisions only) Total WCA Wetland Impact Area: 0.39 acres Wetland Replacement Type: ☐ Project Specific Credits: ☒ Bank Credits: 0.78 acres Bank Account Number(s): 1722 Technical Evaluation Panel Findings and Recommendations (attach if any) ☒ Approve ☐ Approve w/Conditions ☐ Deny ☐ No TEP Recommendation LGU Decision ☒ Approved with Conditions (specify below)1 ☐ Approved1 ☐ Denied List Conditions: Decision-Maker for this Application: ☐ Staff ☒ Governing Board/Council ☐ Other: Decision is valid for: ☒ 5 years (default) ☐ Other (specify): 1 Wetland Replacement Plan approval is not valid until BWSR confirms the withdrawal of any required wetland bank credits. For project- specific replacement a financial assurance per MN Rule 8420.0522, Subp. 9 and evidence that all required forms have been recorded on the title of the property on which the replacement wetland is located must be provided to the LGU for the approval to be valid. LGU Findings – Attach document(s) and/or insert narrative providing the basis for the LGU decision1. ☒ Attachment(s) (specify): Wetland Conservation Act Notice of Application with permit application attached and dated September 27, 2022 ☒ Summary: Click here to enter text. Danny Margarit (Carlson McCain) submitted a MN Joint Application on behalf of Xcel Energy requesting approval for impact sequencing and wetland replacement to accommodate expansions to the existing Xcel Energy Hugo Training Center (HTC) facility. BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 2 Expansion of the existing Xcel Energy HTC is required to improve training for gas, electrical, and nuclear operators and improve in-processing for planned nuclear plant maintenance outages. The proposed design meets specific requirements to increase training effectiveness, including an outdoor transmission line and substation training are and indoor 2-story building to support in-processing for nuclear plant maintenance outages. Sequencing Multiple considerations were made by the applicant to address sequencing requirements. As discussed, the purpose of the project is to improve training for gas, electrical, and nuclear operators and improve in-processing for planned nuclear plant maintenance outages. Therefore, the no-build option was rejected even though this option would have resulted in no wetland impacts. Various alternatives were reviewed to avoid wetland impacts. The first was to adding on to the existing building. This would avoid all wetland impacts, but the existing building’s systems were not designed to handle and expansion and made this alternative cost-prohibitive and was therefore rejected. The second alternative that would avoid wetland impacts was to design a 2-cell system for stormwater management, of which the first cell would incorporate pre-treatment and the second cell (wetland) would be for volume control/storage. However, given the elevation of the wetland and the required finished floor elevation of the building, there would be little to no water flow into the wetland, preventing it’s use for stormwater management. This would not meet City runoff requirements. Also, this alternative would also reduce or eliminate the wetland’s hydrology. Because of those reasons, this option was rejected. Moving the stormwater pond that will ultimately impact the wetland to another location on the property was also evaluated but based on the area needed for the training building, parking lot, and transmission/sub- station training area there is no other room on the property available. Utilizing a different or smaller property for the facilities would also avoid wetland impacts, but negates the comprehensive training/safety aspect of the development and was therefore rejected. The preferred alternative locates the new building and associated parking lot in the northeast corner of the parcel. The transmission line and substation training facilities are located throughout the central and northwest portions of the site. A stormwater management pond is proposed immediately west of the new building and parking area to provide stormwater management for the new impervious. Replacement The chosen alternative results in 0.39 acres of impact to Type 2 wetland (Wetland 1). A replacement ratio of 2:1 is required. To meet this, the applicant is proposing to replace these impacts using 0.78 acres of credit from Bank #1722. Bank #1722 is located within the same major watershed (Mississippi River-Twin Cities) as the impacted wetland. No banking credits are available in the same minor watershed as the impacted wetland. Special Considerations The applicant has provided a thorough review of all of the special considerations identified in MN Rule 8420.0515. These include: • Endangered and threatened species • Rare natural communities • Special fish and wildlife resources • Archeological, historic, and cultural resources • Groundwater sensitivity • Sensitive surface waters BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 3 • Education or research use • Waste disposal sites • Consistency with other plans The applicant’s review of the Natural Heritage Inventory System (NHI) resulted in finding one record of a Blandings turtle, a MN threatened species, within a 1-mile radius of the site. Howeverc, the record is historic (25 years ago) so no impacts to this species are expected. No impacts to rare natural communities, special fish and wildlife resources, archeological, historic, or cultural resources, groundwater, or sensitive surface waters are identified. No waste disposal sites exist within the proposed project area. The proposed project is consistent with the City of Hugo’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan The wetland proposed to be impacted (Wetland 1) is a type 2. The MN NWI identified this basin as a PEM1A – Emergent wetland. This wetland basin provides the following functions: surface water detention, nutrient transformation, carbon sequestration, sediment and other particulate retention, and other wildlife habitat. Based on the application submitted and supporting plans and documents, the application for sequencing and wetland replacement using wetland bank 1722 is approved. 1 Findings must consider any TEP recommendations. Attached Project Documents ☐ Site Location Map ☐ Project Plan(s)/Descriptions/Reports (specify): Click here to enter text. Appeals of LGU Decisions If you wish to appeal this decision, you must provide a written request within 30 calendar days of the date you received the notice. All appeals must be submitted to the Board of Water and Soil Resources Executive Director along with a check payable to BWSR for $500 unless the LGU has adopted a local appeal process as identified below. The check must be sent by mail and the written request to appeal can be submitted by mail or e-mail. The appeal should include a copy of this notice, name and contact information of appellant(s) and their representatives (if applicable), a statement clarifying the intent to appeal and supporting information as to why the decision is in error. Send to: Appeals & Regulatory Compliance Coordinator Minnesota Board of Water & Soils Resources 520 Lafayette Road North St. Paul, MN 55155 travis.germundson@state.mn.us Does the LGU have a local appeal process applicable to this decision? ☐ Yes1 ☒ No 1If yes, all appeals must first be considered via the local appeals process. Local Appeals Submittal Requirements (LGU must describe how to appeal, submittal requirements, fees, etc. as applicable) Notice Distribution (include name) Required on all notices: ☒ SWCD TEP Member: Jay Riggs, Washington Conservation District, 455 Hayward Avenue North, Oakdale, MN 55128 jriggs@mnwcd.org BWSR NOD Form – November 12, 2019 4 ☒ BWSR TEP Member: Ben Meyer, Board of Water & Soil Resources, 520 Lafayette Road N., St. Paul, MN 55155, ben.meyer@state.mn.us ☒ LGU TEP Member (if different than LGU contact): Rachel Juba, City of Hugo, rjuba@ci.hugo.mn.us Liz Finnegan, City of Hugo, LFinnegan@ci.hugo.mn.us ☒ DNR Representative: Kelly Pharis, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 1200 Warner Road, St. Paul, MN 55106 kelly.pharis@state.mn.us, Dan Scollan, MN DNR, Daniel.scollan@state.mn.us ☒ Watershed District or Watershed Mgmt. Org.: Patrick Hughes, phughes@ricecreek.org; Rice Creek Watershed District, 4325 Pheasant Ridge Drive, Suite 611, Blaine, MN 55449-4539 ☒ Applicant: Zachary Mahlum, Xcel Energy, 4855 Bloom Avenue, White Bear Lake, MN 55110, tim.wald@isd624.org ☒ Agent/Consultant: Danny Margarit, Carlson McCain Optional or As Applicable: ☒ Corps of Engineers: Daryl Wierzbinski, US Army Corps of Engineers, Duluth Office, 600 South Lake Avenue, Suite 211, Duluth, MN 55802, daryl.w.wierzbinski@usace.army.mil ☐ BWSR Wetland Mitigation Coordinator (required for bank plan applications only): ☐ Members of the Public (notice only): ☐ Other: Signature: Date: This notice and accompanying application materials may be sent electronically or by mail. The LGU may opt to send a summary of the application to members of the public upon request per 8420.0255, Subp. 3. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 1 of 11 Joint Application Form for Activities Affecting Water Resources in Minnesota This joint application form is the accepted means for initiating review of proposals that may affect a water resource (wetland, tributary, lake, etc.) in the State of Minnesota under state and federal regulatory programs. Applicants for Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) Public Waters permits MUST use the MPARS online permitting system for submitting applications to the DNR. Applicants can use the information entered into MPARS to substitute for completing parts of this joint application form (see the paragraph on MPARS at the end of the joint application form instructions for additional information). This form is only applicable to the water resource aspects of proposed projects under state and federal regulatory programs; other local applications and approvals may be required. Depending on the nature of the project and the location and type of water resources impacted, multiple authorizations may be required as different regulatory programs have different types of jurisdiction over different types of resources. Regulatory Review Structure Federal The St. Paul District of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) is the federal agency that regulates discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States (wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.) under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and regulates work in navigable waters under Section 10 of the Rivers and Harbors Act. Applications are assigned to Corps project managers who are responsible for implementing the Corps regulatory program within a particular geographic area. State There are three state regulatory programs that regulate activities affecting water resources. The Wetland Conservation Act (WCA) regulates most activities affecting wetlands. It is administered by local government units (LGUs) which can be counties, townships, cities, watershed districts, watershed management organizations or state agencies (on state-owned land). The Minnesota DNR Division of Ecological and Water Resources issues permits for work in specially-designated public waters via the Public Waters Work Permit Program (DNR Public Waters Permits). The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) under Section 401 of the Clean Water Act certifies that discharges of dredged or fill material authorized by a federal permit or license comply with state water quality standards. One or more of these regulatory programs may be applicable to any one project. Required Information Prior to submitting an application, applicants are strongly encouraged to seek input from the Corps Project Manager and LGU staff to identify regulatory issues and required application materials for their proposed project. Project proponents can request a pre- application consultation with the Corps and LGU to discuss their proposed project by providing the information required in Sections 1 through 5 of this joint application form to facilitate a meaningful discussion about their project. Many LGUs provide a venue (such as regularly scheduled technical evaluation panel meetings) for potential applicants to discuss their projects with multiple agencies prior to submitting an application. Contact information is provided below. The following bullets outline the information generally required for several common types of determinations/authorizations. • For delineation approvals and/or jurisdictional determinations, submit Parts 1, 2 and 5, and Attachment A. • For activities involving CWA/WCA exemptions, WCA no-loss determinations, and activities not requiring mitigation, submit Parts 1 through 5, and Attachment B. • For activities requiring compensatory mitigation/replacement plan, submit Parts 1 thru 5, and Attachments C and D. • For local road authority activities that qualify for the state’s local road wetland replacement program, submit Parts 1 through 5, and Attachments C, D (if applicable), and E to both the Corps and the LGU. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 2 of 11 Submission Instructions Send the completed joint application form and all required attachments to: U.S Army Corps of Engineers. Applications may be sent directly to the appropriate Corps Office. For a current listing of areas of responsibilities and contact information, visit the St. Paul District’s website at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory.aspx and select “Minnesota” from the contact Information box. Alternatively, applications may be sent directly to the St. Paul District Headquarters and the Corps will forward them to the appropriate field office. Section 401 Water Quality Certification: Applicants do not need to submit the joint application form to the MPCA unless specifically requested. The MPCA will request a copy of the completed joint application form directly from an applicant when they determine an individual 401 water quality certification is required for a proposed project. Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit: Send to the appropriate Local Government Unit. If necessary, contact your county Soil and Water Conservation District (SWCD) office or visit the Board of Water and Soil Resources (BWSR) web site (www.bwsr.state.mn.us) to determine the appropriate LGU. DNR Public Waters Permitting: In 2014 the DNR will begin using the Minnesota DNR Permitting and Reporting System (MPARS) for submission of Public Waters permit applications (https://webapps11.dnr.state.mn.us/mpars/public/authentication/login). Applicants for Public Waters permits MUST use the MPARS online permitting system for submitting applications to the DNR. To avoid duplication and to streamline the application process among the various resource agencies, applicants can use the information entered into MPARS to substitute for completing parts of this joint application form. The MPARS print/save function will provide the applicant with a copy of the Public Waters permit application which, at a minimum, will satisfy Parts one and two of this joint application. For certain types of activities, the MPARS application may also provide all of the necessary information required under Parts three and four of the joint application. However, it is the responsibility of the Applicant to make sure that the joint application contains all of the required information, including identification of all aquatic resources impacted by the project (see Part four of the joint application). After confirming that the MPARS application contains all of the required information in Parts one and two the Applicant may attach a copy to the joint application and fill in any missing information in the remainder of the joint application. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 3 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: PART ONE: Applicant Information If applicant is an entity (company, government entity, partnership, etc.), an authorized contact person must be identified. If the applicant is using an agent (consultant, lawyer, or other third party) and has authorized them to act on their behalf, the agent’s contact information must also be provided. Applicant/Landowner Name: Xcel Energy Mailing Address: 414 Nicollet Mall, Mezzanine, Minneapolis, MN 55401 Phone: 608-780-8761 E-mail Address: Zachary.mahlum@xcelenergy.com Authorized Contact (do not complete if same as above): Mailing Address: Phone: E-mail Address: Agent Name: Danny Margarit Mailing Address: 15650 36th Ave N Suite 110, Plymouth, MN 55446 Phone: 651-304-0391 E-mail Address: dmargarit@carlsonmccain.com PART TWO: Site Location Information County: Washington City/Township: Hugo Parcel ID and/or Address: 13620 Fenway Boulevard North Legal Description (Section, Township, Range): Sec 30, T31N, R21W Lat/Long (decimal degrees): 45.149045126700784, -93.00099798653694 Attach a map showing the location of the site in relation to local streets, roads, highways. Approximate size of site (acres) or if a linear project, length (feet): 15.66 acres If you know that your proposal will require an individual Permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you must provide the names and addresses of all property owners adjacent to the project site. This information may be provided by attaching a list to your application or by using block 25 of the Application for Department of the Army permit which can be obtained at: http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Portals/57/docs/regulatory/RegulatoryDocs/engform_4345_2012oct.pdf PART THREE: General Project/Site Information If this application is related to a delineation approval, exemption determination, jurisdictional determination, or other correspondence submitted prior to this application then describe that here and provide the Corps of Engineers project number. Describe the project that is being proposed, the project purpose and need, and schedule for implementation and completion. The project description must fully describe the nature and scope of the proposed activity including a description of all project elements that effect aquatic resources (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) and must also include plans and cross section or profile drawings showing the location, character, and dimensions of all proposed activities and aquatic resource impacts. Please see attached narrative. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 4 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: PART FOUR: Aquatic Resource Impact1 Summary If your proposed project involves a direct or indirect impact to an aquatic resource (wetland, lake, tributary, etc.) identify each impact in the table below. Include all anticipated impacts, including those expected to be temporary. Attach an overhead view map, aerial photo, and/or drawing showing all of the aquatic resources in the project area and the location(s) of the proposed impacts. Label each aquatic resource on the map with a reference number or letter and identify the impacts in the following table. Aquatic Resource ID (as noted on overhead view) Aquatic Resource Type (wetland, lake, tributary etc.) Type of Impact (fill, excavate, drain, or remove vegetation) Duration of Impact Permanent (P) or Temporary (T)1 Size of Impact2 Overall Size of Aquatic Resource 3 Existing Plant Community Type(s) in Impact Area4 County, Major Watershed #, and Bank Service Area # of Impact Area5 Wetland 1 Wetland Excavate P 0.39 Acres N/A Wet Meadow Washington County, 20, 7 1If impacts are temporary; enter the duration of the impacts in days next to the “T”. For example, a project with a temporary access fill that would be removed after 220 days would be entered “T (220)”. 2Impacts less than 0.01 acre should be reported in square feet. Impacts 0.01 acre or greater should be reported as acres and rounded to the nearest 0.01 acre. Tributary impacts must be reported in linear feet of impact and an area of impact by indicating first the linear feet of impact along the flowline of the stream followed by the area impact in parentheses). For example, a project that impacts 50 feet of a stream that is 6 feet wide would be reported as 50 ft (300 square feet). 3This is generally only applicable if you are applying for a de minimis exemption under MN Rules 8420.0420 Subp. 8, otherwise enter “N/A”. 4Use Wetland Plants and Plant Community Types of Minnesota and Wisconsin 3rd Ed. as modified in MN Rules 8420.0405 Subp. 2. 5Refer to Major Watershed and Bank Service Area maps in MN Rules 8420.0522 Subp. 7. If any of the above identified impacts have already occurred, identify which impacts they are and the circumstances associated with each: PART FIVE: Applicant Signature Check here if you are requesting a pre-application consultation with the Corps and LGU based on the information you have provided. Regulatory entities will not initiate a formal application review if this box is checked. By signature below, I attest that the information in this application is complete and accurate. I further attest that I possess the authority to undertake the work described herein. Signature: Date: I hereby authorize Danny Margarit to act on my behalf as my agent in the processing of this application and to furnish, upon request, supplemental information in support of this application. 1 The term “impact” as used in this joint application form is a generic term used for disclosure purposes to identify activities that may require approval from one or more regulatory agencies. For purposes of this form it is not meant to indicate whether or not those activities may require mitigation/replacement. 9/23/22 Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 5 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: Attachment A Request for Delineation Review, Wetland Type Determination, or Jurisdictional Determination By submission of the enclosed wetland delineation report, I am requesting that the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District (Corps) and/or the Wetland Conservation Act Local Government Unit (LGU) provide me with the following (check all that apply): Wetland Type Confirmation Delineation Concurrence. Concurrence with a delineation is a written notification from the Corps and a decision from the LGU concurring, not concurring, or commenting on the boundaries of the aquatic resources delineated on the property. Delineation concurrences are generally valid for five years unless site conditions change. Under this request alone, the Corps will not address the jurisdictional status of the aquatic resources on the property, only the boundaries of the resources within the review area (including wetlands, tributaries, lakes, etc.). Preliminary Jurisdictional Determination. A preliminary jurisdictional determination (PJD) is a non-binding written indication from the Corps that waters, including wetlands, identified on a parcel may be waters of the United States. For purposes of computation of impacts and compensatory mitigation requirements, a permit decision made on the basis of a PJD will treat all waters and wetlands in the review area as if they are jurisdictional waters of the U.S. PJDs are advisory in nature and may not be appealed. Approved Jurisdictional Determination. An approved jurisdictional determination (AJD) is an official Corps determination that jurisdictional waters of the United States are either present or absent on the property. AJDs can generally be relied upon by the affected party for five years. An AJD may be appealed through the Corps administrative appeal process. In order for the Corps and LGU to process your request, the wetland delineation must be prepared in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual, any approved Regional Supplements to the 1987 Manual, and the Guidelines for Submitting Wetland Delineations in Minnesota (2013). http://www.mvp.usace.army.mil/Missions/Regulatory/DelineationJDGuidance.aspx Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 6 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: Attachment B Supporting Information for Applications Involving Exemptions, No Loss Determinations, and Activities Not Requiring Mitigation Complete this part if you maintain that the identified aquatic resource impacts in Part Four do not require wetland replacement/compensatory mitigation OR if you are seeking verification that the proposed water resource impacts are either exempt from replacement or are not under CWA/WCA jurisdiction. Identify the specific exemption or no-loss provision for which you believe your project or site qualifies: Provide a detailed explanation of how your project or site qualifies for the above. Be specific and provide and refer to attachments and exhibits that support your contention. Applicants should refer to rules (e.g. WCA rules), guidance documents (e.g. BWSR guidance, Corps guidance letters/public notices), and permit conditions (e.g. Corps General Permit conditions) to determine the necessary information to support the application. Applicants are strongly encouraged to contact the WCA LGU and Corps Project Manager prior to submitting an application if they are unsure of what type of information to provide: Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 7 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: Attachment C Avoidance and Minimization Project Purpose, Need, and Requirements. Clearly state the purpose of your project and need for your project. Also include a description of any specific requirements of the project as they relate to project location, project footprint, water management, and any other applicable requirements. Attach an overhead plan sheet showing all relevant features of the project (buildings, roads, etc.), aquatic resource features (impact areas noted) and construction details (grading plans, storm water management plans, etc.), referencing these as necessary: See attached document. Avoidance. Both the CWA and the WCA require that impacts to aquatic resources be avoided if practicable alternatives exist. Clearly describe all on-site measures considered to avoid impacts to aquatic resources and discuss at least two project alternatives that avoid all impacts to aquatic resources on the site. These alternatives may include alternative site plans, alternate sites, and/or not doing the project. Alternatives should be feasible and prudent (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 2 C). Applicants are encouraged to attach drawings and plans to support their analysis: See attached document. Minimization. Both the CWA and the WCA require that all unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources be minimized to the greatest extent practicable. Discuss all features of the proposed project that have been modified to minimize the impacts to water resources (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 4): See attached document. Off-Site Alternatives. An off-site alternatives analysis is not required for all permit applications. If you know that your proposal will require an individual permit (standard permit or letter of permission) from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, you may be required to provide an off-site alternatives analysis. The alternatives analysis is not required for a complete application but must be provided during the review process in order for the Corps to complete the evaluation of your application and reach a final decision. Applicants with questions about when an off-site alternatives analysis is required should contact their Corps Project Manager. Minnesota Interagency Water Resource Application Form February 2014 Page 8 of 11 Project Name and/or Number: Attachment D Replacement/Compensatory Mitigation Complete this part if your application involves wetland replacement/compensatory mitigation not associated with the local road wetland replacement program. Applicants should consult Corps mitigation guidelines and WCA rules for requirements. Replacement/Compensatory Mitigation via Wetland Banking. Complete this section if you are proposing to use credits from an existing wetland bank (with an account number in the State wetland banking system) for all or part of your replacement/compensatory mitigation requirements. Wetland Bank Account # County Major Watershed # Bank Service Area # Credit Type (if applicable) Number of Credits 1722 Anoka 20 7 2/7 0.78 Applicants should attach documentation indicating that they have contacted the wetland bank account owner and reached at least a tentative agreement to utilize the identified credits for the project. This documentation could be a signed purchase agreement, signed application for withdrawal of credits or some other correspondence indicating an agreement between the applicant and the bank owner. However, applicants are advised not to enter into a binding agreement to purchase credits until the mitigation plan is approved by the Corps and LGU. Project-Specific Replacement/Permittee Responsible Mitigation. Complete this section if you are proposing to pursue actions (restoration, creation, preservation, etc.) to generate wetland replacement/compensatory mitigation credits for this proposed project. WCA Action Eligible for Credit1 Corps Mitigation Compensation Technique2 Acres Credit % Requested Credits Anticipated3 County Major Watershed # Bank Service Area # 1Refer to the name and subpart number in MN Rule 8420.0526. 2Refer to the technique listed in St. Paul District Policy for Wetland Compensatory Mitigation in Minnesota. 3If WCA and Corps crediting differs, then enter both numbers and distinguish which is Corps and which is WCA. Explain how each proposed action or technique will be completed (e.g. wetland hydrology will be restored by breaking the tile……) and how the proposal meets the crediting criteria associated with it. Applicants should refer to the Corps mitigation policy language, WCA rule language, and all associated Corps and WCA guidance related to the action or technique: Attach a site location map, soils map, recent aerial photograph, and any other maps to show the location and other relevant features of each wetland replacement/mitigation site. Discuss in detail existing vegetation, existing landscape features, land use (on and surrounding the site), existing soils, drainage systems (if present), and water sources and movement. Include a topographic map showing key features related to hydrology and water flow (inlets, outlets, ditches, pumps, etc.): 15650 36th AVENUE NORTH, SUITE 110, PLYMOUTH, MN 55446 \ TEL 763.489.7900 \ FAX 763.489.7959 \ CARLSONMCCAIN.COM ENGINEERING \ LAND SURVEYING \ ENVIRONMENTAL November 2, 2022 Mr. Tim Mauseth Xcel Energy 414 Nicollet Mall -2 Minneapolis, MN 55401 Re: Minnesota Joint Application – Attachment C: Avoidance and Minimization 13620 Fenway Boulevard North Hugo, Minnesota Dear Mr. Mauseth: Carlson McCain, Inc. is pleased to present this Avoidance and Minimization narrative to fulfill the requirements of the Minnesota Joint Application – Attachment C, as required for the wetland fill and replacement project for the above referenced Site (also referred to as the Property). The narrative was completed to explain the Project purpose, need, & requirements, as well as address avoidance and minimization, as required by Minnesota State Statute. The attached site plan (C2-1) impacts wetland resources on the property by placing a stormwater retention pond over an existing 0.39-acre Type 3 wetland in the center of the property (Wetland 1, shown on Figure 1). The wetland was originally delineated as 0.47 acres by Cedar Corporation (Cedar) during a field visit on September 22, 2021; however, it was never confirmed by the Local government Unit(LGU), who in this area is the city of Hugo. Carlson McCain then arranged a site visit with the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) to confirm the wetland boundary on July 20, 2022. During this meeting, an additional soil boring was completed (BORE 1-4) which identified an upland mound. The delineation was revised to avoid this mound which resulted in a 0.39-acre wetland. This entire wetland will be replaced at a 2:1 ratio. The proposed stormwater pond rim will be vegetated with a BWSR- approved seed mix. This wetland is located within the Clearwater Creek minor watershed and the Mississippi River major watershed, in Washington County (Middle Mississippi River Wetland Bank Service Area). The attached Figure 2 shows the soil survey map, including hydric ratings for the Property. As required by the City of Hugo, the FEMA floodplain and nearest watercourse are shown on Figure 3 (there are no surface inlets or outlets for the wetland). The wetland is currently within a drainage and utility easement; however, the City of Hugo has indicated that it will vacate the easement upon approval of the development plans. Minnesota Joint Application – Attachment C: Avoidance and Minimization 13620 Fenway Boulevard North – Hugo, Minnesota Carlson McCain, Inc. Page 2 8420.0515 Special Considerations. This section addresses the Special Considerations listed in Minnesota State Statute 8420.0515 that should he reviewed before submitting a replacement plan. 1. Endangered and threatened species – A review of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR) Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) data identified an observation of 1 female Blanding’s Turtle on the east side of Highway 61 in 1997 (approximately 1,100 feet from Wetland 1). No other observations were listed. Since there have been no observations in the past 25 years and since no observations were made during the site visit, there is little risk of this replacement project impacting endangered and threatened species. 2. Rare natural communities – A review of the NHIS data did not identify any rare natural communities. 3. Special fish and wildlife resources – The wetland is not connected to any stream (that would provide fish passage and spawning areas), does not contain any colonial water bird nesting colonies, retain enough surface water to act as a migratory waterfowl concentration area, provide shelter usable as a deer wintering area, and does not provide a wildlife travel corridor. 4. Archeological, historic, or cultural resource sites – A review of the Property for known archaeological, historical, or cultural resource sites was requested from the Minnesota State Historical Preservation Office. No sites were identified on the Property. 5. Groundwater sensitivity – industry Best Management Practices (BMPs), including a filtration trench surrounding the retention pond, grading to encourage natural infiltration within green spaces among the power line corridors, and others are incorporated into the site design per the City of Hugo’s rules. In utilizing these BMPs, groundwater risks due to this project will be minimized. 6. Sensitive surface waters – MN State Statue 7050.0335 was reviewed, and no outstanding resource value waters were identified on the Property. In addition, MN State Statute 6264.0050 was reviewed, and no trout waters were identified on the Property. 7. Education or research use – According to the Property owner, Wetland 1 is not used for any educational or research purposes. 8. Waste disposal sites – There has been no hazardous or potentially hazardous waste observed during site visits to Wetland 1. 9. Consistency with other plans – The Vision Statement of the City of Hugo’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan promotes development along several growth corridors, including Highway 61 (where this Project is located) to concentrate commercial/industrial development, allowing the non-Growth Corridor areas to remain sparsely populated to preserve the “rural” feel of the city. One of the Economic Development Guiding Principles is to “Provide quality development that will ensure an expanded tax base and employment opportunities for residents,” which this Project will provide. Minnesota Joint Application – Attachment C: Avoidance and Minimization 13620 Fenway Boulevard North – Hugo, Minnesota Carlson McCain, Inc. Page 3 Project Purpose, Need, and Requirements. Clearly state the purpose of your project and need for your project. Also include a description of any specific requirements of the project as they relate to project location, project footprint, water management, and any other applicable requirements. Attach an overhead plan sheet showing all relevant features of the project (buildings, roads, etc.), aquatic resource features (impact areas noted) and construction details (grading plans, storm water management plans, etc.), referencing these as necessary: In 2013, the current Xcel Energy Hugo Training Center (HTC) building was designed, permitted, and constructed. The original plans for the site included several future training facility expansions and space to locate a future service center on the north half of the property. The company’s vision would have the site become the host for most of the company’s staff training of gas, electrical and nuclear operators in their northern territories. The proposed site facilities and co-location of training staff will create operating efficiencies and provide new opportunities for training collaboration with other utilities’ staff and first responders from throughout the region. Safety is a core value at Xcel Energy, and the development of high-quality training facilities for their employees has been prioritized. By centralizing their training operations and dedicating the entire HTC property to support training activities, Xcel can expand and improve an already industry-leading training facility. The proposed development of the site consists of two separate, but related projects. The first, a transmission lines and substation outdoor training facility would greatly increase the training effectiveness of these facilities as it fully replicates real-world conditions with transmission lines, a substation, and interactions between the two facilities. The design will consist of 3 different line sizes and approximately 25 different pole type structures with a height range of approximately 43’ to 105’. The substation will be an approximately 1.65-acre class-5 gravel pad, enclosed by a 10’ chain link galvanized fence (simulating a real-life substation). From a training perspective, this is far superior to separate training facilities for different infrastructure. Benefits for constructing the new facilities on the north half of the HTC site: • Offers a centralized training center with convenient access to the adjacent indoor training center building that offers classrooms, restrooms, and protection during inclement weather. • Connecting the Substation and Transmission Line outdoor yards together would create a “real life scenario” training yard that could provide more teaching opportunities about safety. • Wide open areas without obstacles allow for increased safety while maneuvering larger equipment around transmission line structures for training exercises. • Adequate space to host larger groups of both Xcel Energy and foreign utility (non-Xcel Energy) crews for training purposes. This larger yard could host a “lineman rodeo”, which is a competitive training event where approximately 4-groups of 15-20 people per group (up to 100- 150 people total) would simultaneously cycle through different stations to train on various real- life scenarios. • Potential to host training exercises for contractors, other utility companies, and various governmental emergency services. Minnesota Joint Application – Attachment C: Avoidance and Minimization 13620 Fenway Boulevard North – Hugo, Minnesota Carlson McCain, Inc. Page 4 The second proposed project is a separate two-story building and accompanying parking lot. As part of their normal schedule of operations, the nuclear plants are taken off-line for refueling, training and maintenance periods. This Central In-Processing (CIP) building will serve a critical role in supporting these planned plant outages. Currently, In-processing for employees and contractors that support nuclear maintenance outages is provided at the individual sites, but the configuration of facilities at the sites aren’t efficient. Outages typically require an additional 800 staff and contractors from throughout Xcel and from around the country to surge onto the site for a work period. In-processing is required for all types of contractor trades: electricians, pipefitters, steelworkers, plumbers, HVAC, etc.). Presently, for each outage, temporary offices, classroom trailers and other equipment is moved on-site to facilitate maintenance activities. Also, during outage operations, training for site personnel must be suspended to free up classroom space. This project provides Xcel with opportunities to improve efficiencies and significantly lower operating costs. In addition to improving In-Processing operations, Xcel training personnel see the opportunity to relocate training operations now hosted at the RTC, which is over 90 years old. This will allow Xcel to centralize their Technical Training staff in Hugo, creating operating efficiencies and improving the sharing of resources across Xcel’s training programs. The project includes construction of virtual training classrooms, to lower training costs as well as provide needed space to train the workforce of the future in Renewable Energy technologies. Avoidance. Both the CWA and the WCA require that impacts to aquatic resources be avoided if practicable alternatives exist. Clearly describe all on-site measures considered to avoid impacts to aquatic resources and discuss at least two project alternatives that avoid all impacts to aquatic resources on the site. These alternatives may include alternative site plans, alternate sites, and/or not doing the project. Alternatives should be feasible and prudent (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 2 C). Applicants are encouraged to attach drawings and plans to support their analysis: The original development plan called for adding on to the existing building (see attached Concept Plan A). This was quickly deemed not feasible since the existing building’s systems were not designed to handle an expansion, and therefore it would be significantly expensive to add on to the current building. Reducing the building and/or parking lot size (as shown in the attached Concept Plan B) could minimize wetland impacts twofold by first creating more room for the stormwater pond, and by minimizing the size of stormwater pond required. However, the size of the proposed building (footprint of approximately 24,700 square feet) is driven by specific programming requirements from the departments to be using the building (see Attachment A). Any reduction in size would limit the effectiveness of the new facility. The design and floor layouts optimize efficiencies of the activities planned for the facility. Reducing or reconfiguring the design would have a negative impact on the overall use of the facility. The current plan does exceed the required parking outlined by the City Code. A total of 186 Parking Stall is required for the In-Processing Building and a total of 329 Parking Stalls are being provided. The parking above and beyond the Code requirement is required by Xcel to make this facility function due to the Training nature this facility is providing (ie events where a large number of “non-regular” employees will be requiring parking, in addition to the “everyday” Minnesota Joint Application – Attachment C: Avoidance and Minimization 13620 Fenway Boulevard North – Hugo, Minnesota Carlson McCain, Inc. Page 5 employees). In addition, the proposed building and parking were placed in such a manner to be set back more than the minimum requirements set forth in the City Zoning Requirements. At the guidance of the City of Hugo, the additional set back is meant to enable additional landscape area to provide screening of the proposed training yard infrastructure. A 2-cell system (incorporating pre-treatment and utilizing the wetland for storage) was proposed by the TEP during the pre-application meeting as another alternative. The proposed ponds have a normal water level elevation of 924’. This is required to drain the parking lots and surrounding building area with minimal slope and minimal storm sewer design. The existing wetland is at an elevation of approximately 927’ which is about 3 feet higher than the stormwater management ponds. Given this existing wetland elevation and required finished floor elevation, there would be little to no water flow into the existing wetland (preventing its use of the wetland for stormwater management). A suggestion was then made to raise the building. Loucks may potentially raise the building about 2 feet to accommodate excess material onsite. With standard engineering grading practices to provide foundation drainage away from the building (per Dept. of Labor & Industry) and design 2% minimum slopes on overland flows (bituminous surfaces and green swales) the catch basin on the east side of the building could be raised to 932+/-. Subtracting 4 feet for a minimum structure build provides an invert of ~928. From there the minimum pipe slope to accommodate the flow is used, resulting in a drop of about 3 feet. The pond NWL would then be 925 – 926, which is still below the existing wetland elevation of ~927. Moving the catch basins to shorten the length of the storm sewer was also suggested; however, that would only exacerbate the issue since overland flow is 2% minimum, where pipe slope can be less than 2%, depending upon the pipe size and the quantity of flow. Therefore, in this alternative (see attached Wetland Avoidance Grading Plan) the volume that could be provided with this ponding does not meet the City runoff requirements (as shown in the table below). Proposed Plans TEP Requested Alternative Pond 1 Storage 131,585 ft3 118,645 ft3 Pond 2 Storage 75,837 ft3 86,188(1) ft3 Max Allowable Discharge(2) 1.55 ft3/s 1.55 ft3/s Actual Discharge 1.29 ft3/s 3.71 ft3/s Meets City Requirements Doesn't Meet City Requirements Notes: · (1) Pond 2 didn't change in shape, but the high water level is increased due to lack of Pond 1 volume · (2) From Pond 2 In addition, this alternative would not prevent impacts to the wetland, because it would significantly reduce or eliminate the wetland’s hydrology (due to the excavated adjacent pond 1 draining the wetland). The TEP also suggested treating only 85% of runoff stormwater runoff to allow for smaller 1st cell in the 2-cell system (which would then utilize the wetland as the 2nd cell). However, since Minnesota Joint Application – Attachment C: Avoidance and Minimization 13620 Fenway Boulevard North – Hugo, Minnesota Carlson McCain, Inc. Page 6 incorporating the wetland into a 2-cell system was shown to not satisfy the storage requirements in the first place, this approach does not help. Wetland impacts could be avoided if the stormwater ponds were constructed elsewhere on the Property; however, based on the area needed for the training building, parking lot to accompany the workers, the wide footprint needed to use the transmission line/substation “real-life” scenario, and the existing building/training operations, there is no room elsewhere on the property to construct the pond. The existing building (constructed in 2013) did have stormwater management requirements which were provided as part of those projects. There is no additional capacity to provide stormwater management for the proposed project in these existing basins. In addition, it is likely that the City stormwater requirements have changed since those basins were constructed, so if there was capacity it likely doesn’t meet the current City standards. If a smaller site was selected, the substation and transmission lines may need to be constructed separately (i.e. not connected) and perhaps on different sites. This negates the comprehensive training/safety aspect of this development (one of the main goals for Xcel). Any alternative site would also likely not have the convenience of adjacent classrooms, restrooms, and storm shelters that the HTC site currently offers. Relocating any of the proposed facilities development to the southwest corner of the Property would interfere with the “school of dirt” and the “gas extinguishing pit” training areas, both currently located in the southwest corner of the site. By not completing the project Xcel would fail to realize the extensive goals and benefits described in the prior section. Minimization. Both the CWA and the WCA require that all unavoidable impacts to aquatic resources be minimized to the greatest extent practicable. Discuss all features of the proposed project that have been modified to minimize the impacts to water resources (see MN Rules 8420.0520 Subp. 4): The impacts to this wetland have been minimized to the greatest extent possible by designing the development in a way that the majority of the wetland will still remain as a natural feature (vegetated stormwater retention pond). While the vegetation quality may decrease, the basin will still provide water storage/infiltration/filtration benefits as a stormwater pond. In addition, the basin will still provide habitat for invertebrates, birds, and other wildlife. Minnesota Joint Application – Attachment C: Avoidance and Minimization 13620 Fenway Boulevard North – Hugo, Minnesota Carlson McCain, Inc. Page 7 Closing If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to call me at (651) 304-0391 or send me an e- mail at dmargarit@carlsonmccain.com. We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this Project. Sincerely, Carlson McCain, Inc. Danny Margarit, PhD Environmental Scientist Figures and Attachments: As noted !( !( !( !( !( !( Wetland 1 Wetland 2 BORE 2-2 BORE 1-1 BORE 1-4BORE 2-1 BORE 1-3 BORE 1-2 August 2022P:\Projects\DKM Projects\10130 - Xcel Hugo Training Facility\gis\Delineation map.mxd1:1,800 Basemap: MnGeo color 7-county, 2020. Figure 1Revised Delineation Map13620 Fenway Blvd NHugo, Minnesota Legend !(Wetland Observation Point !(Upland Observation Point Delineated Wetlands Property Boundary £0 150 Feet Seelyevillemuck( 100%) Zimmerman fine sand (2%) Sodervilleloamy finesand (3%) Lino variant loamyfine sand (0%) Markeymuck (95%) Kratkafine loam (97%) Lino loamy finesand (5%)June 2022P:\Projects\DKM Projects\10130 - Xcel Hugo Training Facility\gis\Fig 2 Hydric Soils Map.mxd1:2,400 Basemap: MnGeo color 7-county, 2020. Figure 2Hydric Soils Map13620 Fenway Blvd NHugo, Minnesota Legend Lino variant loamy fine sand (0%) Zimmerman fine sand (2%) Soderville loamy fine sand (3%) Lino loamy fine sand (5%) Markey muck (95%) Kratka fine loam (97%) Seelyeville muck( 100%) Property Boundary £0 200 Feet Unnamed Feature Wetland 1Wetland 2 Egg Lake Clearwater CreekAugust 2022P:\Projects\DKM Projects\10130 - Xcel Hugo Training Facility\gis\Floodplain Map.mxd1:9,600 Basemap: MnGeo color 7-county, 2020. Figure 3Floodplain Map 13620 Fenway Blvd NHugo, Minnesota Legend Public Waters Public Waters - Streams FEMA Floodplain Delineated Wetlands Property Boundary £0 800 Feet FENWAY BLVD NORTHSEE SHEET 3 OF 4 SHEETSFOR TOPOGRAPHIC DETAILSSEE SHEET 2 OF 4 SHEETSFOR TOPOGRAPHIC DETAILS12FENWAY BLVD NORTH111111SEE SHEET 4 OF 4 SHEETSFOR TOPOGRAPHIC DETAILSFENWAY BLVD NORTH1616PARCEL 1PARCEL 2164171511615151515159161162222222211291612516164POND 1NWL=924.0HWL=926.9BTM=918.0POND 2NWL=919.0HWL=920.6BTM=914.0FFE=933.024.0'9.0'TYP18.0'TYP5'RB612 C&G (TYP.)24.0'9.0'TYP18.0'TYP24.0'24.0'24.0'24.0'24.0'18.0'TYP5'R5'R5'R5'R5'R5'R5'R5'R5'R5'R5'R5'R5'R5'R5'R5'R5'R25'R25'R18.0'TYP32.0'24.0'10.0'24.0'9.0'TYP18.0'TYP10.0'CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.)MATCH EXISTINGBITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE PAVEMENTSTANDARD DUTYPAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY PAVEMENTADA SIGN TYP SEE DETAILTYPICAL ADAPARKING STALLSSEE DETAIL59.3'58.6'24.0'9.0'TYP18.0'TYP24.0'24.0'24.0'24.0'24.0'24.0'24.0'25.0'5.0'10.5'5'R20'RCONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP.)B612 C&G (TYP.)STANDARD DUTYPAVEMENTHEAVY DUTY PAVEMENT26'R23'R5'R5'R5'R50'R33.0'50'RCADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project areinstruments of the Consultant professional services for use solelywith respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be usedon other projects, for additions to this project, or for completionof this project by others without written approval by theConsultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may bepermitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files forinformation and reference only. All intentional or unintentionalrevisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall bemade at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additionsor deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify theConsultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities.PLANNINGCIVIL ENGINEERINGLAND SURVEYINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREENVIRONMENTAL7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300Maple Grove, MN 55369763.424.5505www.loucksinc.comPlotted: 08 /01 / 2022 1:22 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\C2-1 - SITE PLANOUCKSLCADD QUALIFICATIONQUALITY CONTROLPROFESSIONAL SIGNATURESUBMITTAL/REVISIONSXCEL HUGO -TRAININGFACILITY13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN55038XCEL ENERGYOWNER ADDRESSReview DateSHEET INDEXLicense No.Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and thatI am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under thelaws of the State of Minnesota.Todd W. McLouth - PE20383Project LeadDrawn ByChecked ByLoucks Project No.22012xx/xx/2208/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTALNathan W. Ekhoff - LAReview DateSHEET INDEXLicense No.Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report wasprepared by me or under my direct supervision and thatI am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the lawsof the State of Minnesota.52050Project LeadDrawn ByChecked ByLoucks Project No.22012JJDCEFNWExx/xx/22C3-1C8-1 to C8-2C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONSC4-1C2-1L2-1L3-1GRADING PLANCIVIL DETAILSUTILITY PLANSITE PLANLANDSCAPE DETAILSLANDSCAPE PLANSC1-2 DEMOLITION PLANC3-2 SWPPP PLANC3-3 SWPPP NOTESL1-1TREE INVENTORYNSCALE IN FEET050 1001. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED INACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCALJURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS.2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADASTANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS.3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.5. TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9' X 18' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.6. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 5.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7. SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING.8. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN FOR BUILDING SETBACKS.DENOTES CONCRETE PAVEMENTDENOTES HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTDENOTES LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTSITE NOTESPAVEMENT LEGENDPARKING STALL COUNTACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL2LEGENDCATCH BASINSTORM SEWERSANITARY SEWERWATERMAINSTORM MANHOLESANITARY MANHOLEHYDRANTGATE VALVESPOT ELEVATIONSIGNLIGHT POLEPOWER POLEWATER MANHOLE / WELLCONTOURCONCRETE CURBUNDERGROUND ELECTRICCONCRETETELEPHONE PEDESTALUNDERGROUND TELEPHONEUNDERGROUND GASOVERHEAD UTILITYCHAIN LINK FENCEBUILDINGRETAINING WALLNO PARKINGUNDERGROUND FIBER OPTICSANITARY SEWER SERVICEWATER SERVICEELECTRIC METERGAS METERTREE LINEEXISTINGPROPOSED972DRAINTILEFORCEMAINPARKING SETBACK LINEBUILDING SETBACK LINE2FENCEFLARED END SECTIONPOST INDICATOR VALVEBENCHMARKSOIL BORINGDIRECTION OF FLOW1.0%972.5WARNING:THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALLEXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES INMAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 ATLEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES,CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFOREDIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGEDDURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.SITE PLANC2-1CURRENT ZONING: BUSINESS PARKPROPOSED ZONING: BUSINESS PARKPROPERTY AREA: 1,226,373 SF / ±28.1 AC EXISTING: 566,280 SF/ ±13.0 AC PROPOSED: 657,756 SF/ ±15.1 ACEXISTING/PROPOSED BUILDING AREA: 71,904 sf / ±1.6 ac (5.6%)ALLOWED UP TO 40%EXISTING/PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 502,934 sf / ±11.5 ac (41.0%)ALLOWED UP TO 80%SITE DATACODE REQUIRED PARKING FOR PROPOSED BUILDING34,740 OFFICE BUILDING / 200 =173 PARKING STALLS6200 TRAINING LABS / 500 =13 PARKING STALLSTOTAL =186 PARKING STALLSPROPOSED PARKING PROVIDEDEXISTING STALLS REMOVED =15PROPOSED STALLS =341NEW TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED =326OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONSBUILDING SETBACKS:FRONT 30 FT MINIMUMSIDE EQUAL TO HEIGHT OF BUILDING(NOT LESS THAN 10 FT) MINIMUMREAR 30 FT MINIMUMOFF-STREET PARKING AND DESIGN STANDARD REQUIREMENTSOFF-STREET PARKING SETBACKS:FRONT 10 FT MINIMUMSIDE 5 FT MINIMUMREAR 5 FT MINIMUMMINIMUM PARKING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS (90 DEGREE PATTERN):PARKING SPACE WIDTH = 9 FTPARKING SPACE LENGTH = 18 FTDRIVE LANE WIDTH = 24 FTDEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS BLOCK 1LOT 1LOT 1BLOCK 1R?R????R?RR?RRRRRRRRRANTANTR∆FENWAY BLVD NORTH1212C13CFENWAY BLVD NORTH1111111111111121FENWAY BLVD NORTH16161616161616151621,800 SF.1310 1010 1010 10101081613422 2222 222020182031118288377CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project areinstruments of the Consultant professional services for use solelywith respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be usedon other projects, for additions to this project, or for completionof this project by others without written approval by theConsultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may bepermitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files forinformation and reference only. All intentional or unintentionalrevisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall bemade at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additionsor deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify theConsultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities.PLANNINGCIVIL ENGINEERINGLAND SURVEYINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREENVIRONMENTAL7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300Maple Grove, MN 55369763.424.5505www.loucksinc.comPlotted: 03 /18 / 2022 8:10 AMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\CP-1 - CONCEPT PLAN AOUCKSLCADD QUALIFICATIONQUALITY CONTROLPROFESSIONAL SIGNATURESUBMITTAL/REVISIONSXCEL HUGO -TRAININGFACILITY13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN55038XCEL ENERGYOWNER ADDRESSNSCALE IN FEET050 100CONCEPTPLAN ACP1 BLOCK 1LOT 1LOT 1BLOCK 1R?R????R?RR?RRRRRRRRRANTANTR∆FENWAY BLVD NORTH1212C13CFENWAY BLVD NORTH1111111111111121FENWAY BLVD NORTH1616161616161615163522181831120,000 SF.18342730298201726116CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project areinstruments of the Consultant professional services for use solelywith respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be usedon other projects, for additions to this project, or for completionof this project by others without written approval by theConsultant. With the Consultant's approval, others may bepermitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files forinformation and reference only. All intentional or unintentionalrevisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall bemade at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additionsor deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify theConsultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities.PLANNINGCIVIL ENGINEERINGLAND SURVEYINGLANDSCAPE ARCHITECTUREENVIRONMENTAL7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300Maple Grove, MN 55369763.424.5505www.loucksinc.comPlotted: 03 /18 / 2022 8:14 AMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Sheet Files\CP-2 - CONCEPT PLAN BOUCKSLCADD QUALIFICATIONQUALITY CONTROLPROFESSIONAL SIGNATURESUBMITTAL/REVISIONSXCEL HUGO -TRAININGFACILITY13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN55038XCEL ENERGYOWNER ADDRESSNSCALE IN FEET050 100CONCEPTPLAN BCP2 FENWAY BLVD NORTHFENWAY BLVD NORTHx 88888888x x x x x x x x x x x 932.5 929.5 928.5 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 21.0 POND 2 NWL=919.0 HWL=920.86 BTM=914.0 930 930932932 932932932 930 930 931.6 931.5 931.5931.6 931.0 930.7 929.0 931.0 930.5 930.3 931.0 929.0 930.0 930.0 930.0 931.6931.7932.5 932.4931.9932.5 931.8 931.5931.6 930.2 929.5 931.0 931.5 931.1 931.1 931.3 932.1 930.0 929.5929.0 932.7 932.7 932.1 932.5 932.5 932.0 932.2 931.0 931.5 930.3 931.0 931.5 930.6 930.2 931.1 931.5 930.5 931.0 930.3 SB24 931.23888888888x932.0 931.0 x 929.5x929.5 x 931.0 x 931.5 x 931.5 x931.5 x 930.7 x 931.5 x 931.5 x931.5 x 931.0x930.6 x 931.0 x 927.0 x FFE=933.0 932.90.5%932.7932.5 932.0 932.3932.1931.89 3 2 . 0 931.7 x 929.5 x 931.5 x 932.0 x 932.0 x 932.0 0.5%931.28888888x 933.0 x21.0 x920.6 930.7 931.0 x27.0POND 1 NWL=924.0 HWL=927.37 BTM=918.0 924 928926926928919 919926 93 2936934918914924922919916914916919922918 9269269 3 0 933 933929928928926 928 928 928926924919 914916918919922924919924.4924.4924924923922920930 918920920920920922924920920920920920920920930 930930 930 930 9 3 0930 930932 9 3 2 932 9309329 2 8 932930928932930930 930930930930926924923922920926924923930 926 9309269249239 2 6 9 2 4 9 2 3 9 2 2 9 2 0 918920922926 92 8 92 4 . 4924.4924.4924.49289289289289289 2 8 9 2 8 HWL=927.37 C ADD f iles pr epar ed by t he Cons ult ant for this p roject ar e instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project. These CADD files shall not be used on other projects, for additions to this project, or for completion of t his p r ojec t by ot her s w it hou t wr i t te n ap pr ov al b y t he C onsultant . With t he Cons ultant's appr oval, ot hers may be per mit t ed t o ob t ain cop ies of t he C AD D dr aw ing files f or information and reference only. All intentional or unintentional revisions, additions, or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions, additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any & all responsibilities, claims, and liabilities. PLANNING CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com Plotted: 09 /02 / 2022 12:52 PMW:\2022\22012\CADD DATA\CIVIL\_dwg Working Files\22 09-01 Wetland Avoidance\C3-1 - WETLAND AVOIDANCE GRADING PLANOUCKSL CADD QUALIFICATION QUALITY CONTROL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE SUBMITTAL/REVISIONS XCEL HUGO - TRAINING FACILITY 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN 55038 XCEL ENERGY 414 NICOLLET MALL, MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 Review Date SHEET INDEX License No. Date I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. Jonathan J. Donovan - PE 44613 Project Lead Drawn By Checked By Loucks Project No.22012 JJD HW TWM 08/09/22 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL 08/09/22 PLAN REVISION C3-1 C8-1 to C8-3 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS C4-1 C2-1 L2-1 L3-1 GRADING PLAN CIVIL DETAILS UTILITY PLAN SITE PLAN LANDSCAPE DETAILS LANDSCAPE PLANS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES L1-1 TREE INVENTORY N SCALE IN FEET 0 50 100 PARKING STALL COUNT ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL 2 LEGEND CATCH BASIN STORM SEWER SANITARY SEWER WATERMAIN STORM MANHOLE SANITARY MANHOLE HYDRANT GATE VALVE SPOT ELEVATION SIGN LIGHT POLE POWER POLE WATER MANHOLE / WELL CONTOUR CONCRETE CURB UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC CONCRETE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND GAS OVERHEAD UTILITY CHAIN LINK FENCE BUILDING RETAINING WALL NO PARKING UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATER SERVICE ELECTRIC METER GAS METER TREE LINE EXISTING PROPOSED 972 DRAINTILE FORCEMAIN 373PARKING SETBACK LINE BUILDING SETBACK LINE 2 FENCE FLARED END SECTION POST INDICATOR VALVE BENCHMARK SOIL BORING 3DIRECTION OF FLOW 1.0% 972.5 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! SEE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR SOIL STABILIZATION INFORMATION. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AROUND THE ENTIRE SITE PERIMETER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES, CITY REQUIREMENTS AND THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL DETAILS SHEETS OF THESE PLANS. ALL CURB SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO GUTTER LINE-UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 1.SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 2.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.10 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS. 3.ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF PREMIUM TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. VERIFY WITH LANDSCAPE PLAN. 4.FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES). 5.REFER TO THE REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND REVIEW (REPORT NO.16.61753.100), DATED 12/08/16 AS PREPARED BY NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INC. FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS. 6.STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS, OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. 7.DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 8.SEE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. 9.SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION. 10.SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. 11.A STREET SWEEPER MUST BE AVAILABLE WITHIN 3 HOURS UPON NOTICE FROM THE CITY THAT THE STREETS NEED TO BE SWEPT. 12.THE CONTRACTOR ALONG WITH THE OWNER SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND APPROVALS FROM GOVERNING AUTHORITIES, INCLUDING ANY CITY PERMITS AND THE NPDES PERMIT FROM THE MPCA. 13.INSTALL EROSION CONTROL AND TREE PROTECTION MEASURES BEFORE BEGINNING SITE GRADING ACTIVITIES. SOME EROSION CONTROLS SUCH AS BALE CHECKS AND TEMPORARY SILT PONDS MAY BE INSTALLED AS GRADING OCCURS IN SPECIFIC AREAS. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROLS THROUGHOUT THE GRADING PROCESS AND REMOVE WHEN TURF HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 14.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA NPDES PERMIT. THE AREA TO BE DISTURBED SHALL BE MINIMIZED AND TURF SHALL BE ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE TIME REQUIRED. 15.GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. 16.FINAL GRADING TOLERANCES ARE +/-0.1 FEET TO FINISH GRADES. 17.UNDER PAVEMENTS COMPACT THE UPPER 3 FEET OF SUBGRADE TO 100% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AND 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY BLOW THE UPPER 3 FEET OF SUBGRADE. OUTSIDE PAVEMENT AREAS COMPACT EMBANKMENTS TO 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. 18. WORKING HOURS ARE 7:00 AM - 10:00 PM, MONDAY - SATURDAY. A 48 HOUR NOTICED IS REQUIRED FOR SATURDAY WORK. 19.THE CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE A CITY LICENSE. 20.A CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO WORKING WITHIN CITY ROW. 21.TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT (TRM) SHALL BE LANDLOK 450, AS MANUFACTURED BY PROPEX GEOSOLUTIONS, OR APPROVED EQUAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL OF THE MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS FOR INSTALLATION. 22.STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL, FENCING AND HANDRAIL DESIGN BY OTHERS. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL SPECIFICATIONSWARNING: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. WETLAND AVOIDANCE GRADING PLAN C3-1 NOTE: EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING INC., DATED 06/14/2022. Attachment A Xcel Specifications for Centralized In-processing Building at Hugo 1. Auditorium 1 is 55ft x 40ft 2200 sq ft 2. Auditorium 2 is 62ft x 40ft 2480 sq ft 3. Auditorium 3 is 54ft x 40ft 2160 sq ft 4. 6 bathrooms with at least one stall for urine collection 5. 1 mid-size room for Breathalyzer testing with ability for 4 stations (20x20 with cubicle separation) 6. Computer lab must be able to hold 120 computers 7. Nurses’ medical station – nurse’s office for logging in and respirator/crane/DOT/VT2 exams (15x15) 8. Office space for instructors and proctors and supervisors (20 cubicles) 9. Mockup area for Dress out (20x20) 10. Fire watch room (10x15) 11. ESOMs classroom – with computers (30x40) 12. Whole Body and Mask Fit room (20x20) 13. Small office for scheduling (10x10) 14. Six classrooms for specialty (30x30) 12 students plus one instructor a. FME b. JLG c. Rigging d. Hilti Hytorc e. Weld Control f. Temp Supervisor co 15. One large Lab area for Rigging and other lab required training (50x50 minimum) 16. Lunch/break area for staff (20x20 minimum) 17. Front desk for checking in and checking out students (20x40) 18. Gas simulator room (30x30) 19. Gas welding (25x90) 20. 7 offices with 1 secure Printer/Fax 21. 3 small rooms or two medium rooms for fingerprints/badge photo id/ psych interview 22. 50 Computers large room for electronic psych exams and ID verification 23. 6 bathrooms and 6 cubicles for RBT and 2 office with secure printer/fax or 1 large office for 2 staff Page 1 of 2 Wetland Credit Agency, LLC w 12940 Overlook Road, Dayton, MN 55327 w 612-360-4700 V2.2_05-16-21 WETLAND CREDIT RESERVATION AGREEMENT This Minnesota Wetland Credit Reservation Agreement (“Agreement”) is made this 22nd day of September, 2022 between the Wetland Credit Agency, LLC (“Broker”) and Xcel Energy (“Buyer”). (Broker and Buyer are collectively referred to as “Parties”). WETLAND CREDIT ACCOUNT(S) Acct. # County Major Watershed BSA (“Seller”) 1722 Anoka 20 – Mississippi (metro) 7 MPJWR Wetland Bank 1. Buyer agrees to buy the wetland banking credits (“Credits”) listed below: CREDITS TO BE SOLD Acct # Credit Sub-group Acres Type Plant Community Type 1722 A 0.0950 2 sedge meadow 1722 B 0.2439 7 coniferous swamp 1722 C 0.3911 7 hardwood swamp 1722 G 0.0500 7 hardwood swamp -- -- -- -- -- Total 0.78 2. Statement Regarding Credits: a) The Credits are deposited in an account in the Minnesota Wetland Bank administered by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources (“BWSR”) pursuant to Minn. Rules Chapter 8420.0700-.0760. b) Seller owns the Credits and has the right to sell the Credits to Buyer. 3. Buyer will pay the sale price as reflected on attached Quote #445, terms as follows: a) $2,500.00 as earnest money, to be paid when this Agreement is signed; and b) The balance to be paid on or before the Closing Date listed below. Page 2 of 2 Wetland Credit Agency, LLC w 12940 Overlook Road, Dayton, MN 55327 w 612-360-4700 V2.2_05-16-21 4. In addition to the Credit fees in paragraph 3, Buyer agrees to pay to Broker the Withdrawal Fee and Easement Stewardship Fee totaling $1,789.32 for BWSR based upon the 2017 BWSR Fee Schedule to be paid at closing. Broker will then execute and forward a check made out for this amount, payable to BWSR. 5. The closing of the purchase and sale shall occur on or before December 22nd, 2022 (Closing Date). The Closing Date may be changed by written consent of both parties. Upon payment of the balance of the purchase price, Seller will sign a fully executed Transaction Form to Withdraw Credits in the form specified by BWSR, and forward the same to BWSR along with a check for the withdrawal fee. 6. Buyer shall apply to the appropriate Local Government Unit (LGU) and the US Army Corps of Engineers for approval of a replacement plan utilizing the Credits as the means of replacing impacted wetlands. If the Local Government Unit (LGU) and/or the US Army Corps of Engineers has not approved the Buyer’s application for a replacement plan utilizing the Credits by the Closing Date, and no postponement of the Closing Date has been agreed to by Buyer and Broker in writing, then Agreement is null and void. In this case, Broker shall return Buyer’s earnest money (if any), and neither Buyer nor Broker shall have any further obligations under this Agreement. If the LGU and/or the US Army Corps of Engineers has approved the replacement plan and the Broker is ready to proceed with the sale on the Closing Date, but Buyer fails to proceed, then the Broker may retain the earnest money as liquidated damages. 7. Buyer agrees that Broker is acting in good faith on behalf of a third party Seller, and that if Seller fails to perform under this Agreement, Broker shall have no liability to Buyer and shall not be held responsible for any claims or damages. Buyer waives any and all claims that Buyer has or may have against Broker resulting from this Agreement. Broker shall however refund any monies paid to it by Buyer. 8. Buyer agrees that Agreement is not valid until a signed copy is provided to Broker. If Buyer has not forwarded a signed copy to Broker within 14 days after date signed by Broker, Agreement is null and void and neither Buyer nor Broker shall have any further obligations under this Agreement. _______________________________________ _________________________________ (Signature of Broker) (Date) (Signature of Buyer) (Date) By: Eric Trelstad, Wetland Credit Agency, LLC By: _____________________________ Its: Owner Its: _____________________________ Address: 12940 Overlook Road Address: _________________________ Dayton, MN 55327 _________________________ 612-360-4700 9/29/22 Chad Wollak Manager, Project & Workplace Services 414 Nicollet Mall, MZ Minneapolis, MN 55401 09/30/2022 Dear Fire Chief: Attached is a grant contract between the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Division of Forestry. Please obtain two signatures on the grant contract and return back to me as soon as possible. I will obtain the final required signature and forward a copy of the fully executed grant contract to you when complete. Work must not begin under this grant contract until fully executed and you have been notified by the State’s Authorized Representative to begin the work. If you have any questions regarding the processing of this grant contract, please let me know. Respectfully, Shelly Greniger Shelly Greniger Rural Fire Programs Asst. Shelly.Greniger@state.mn.us www.mndnr.gov/grants/ruralfire Vendor No.0000201592 Contract No.220958 3000/R29337VH/R293211 PO No.220982 VFA Grant 154 FY23 1 STATE OF MINNESOTA GRANT CONTRACT This grant contract is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Department of Natural Resources, Division or Forestry, 402 Southeast Eleventh Street, Grand Rapids, Minnesota 55744 (“State”) and HUGO FIRE DEPT, 14669 FITZGERALD AVE N, HUGO, MN 55038- ("GRANTEE"). Recitals 1. Under Minn. Stat. 84.085 authorizes the Commissioner of Natural Resources, on behalf of the State, to accept and use grants of money for the United States or other grantors for conservation purposes not inconsistent with the laws of this state and in accordance with the purposes of the grant and applicable Federal and State laws and authorizes the Commissioner to make sub-grants of any money received to other agencies, units of local government, and private nonprofit corporations; and Minn. Stat. 88.067, as amended in Laws of Minnesota 2000, Chapter 231, Section 113, may make grants for procurement of fire suppression equipment and training of fire departments in techniques of fire control. The commissioner may require a local match for any grant. Grantee is a governmental unit and or is a fire fighting entity located in a rural area; and the State is empowered to enter into this grant. 2. The State is in need of fire department assistance to suppress wildland fires. 3. The Grantee represents that it is duly qualified and agrees to perform all services described in this grant contract to the satisfaction of the State. Grant Agreement 1. Term of Grant Agreement 1.1 Effective date: This agreement becomes effective on August 15, 2022, or the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes 16B.98, subdivision 5, whichever is later. The Grantee must not begin work under this sub-grant agreement until this agreement is fully executed and the Grantee has been notified by the State’s Authorized Representative to begin the work. No reimbursements will be made until or upon the date that the final required signature is obtained by the State, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 16B.98, subdivision 5. Per Minnesota Statutes Section 16B.98, subdivision 7, no payments will be made to the Grantee until this grant agreement is fully executed. 1.2 Expiration Date: Work on this project must be completed on or before June 1, 2023. The State is to be invoiced on or before June 15, 2023, or the contract will be canceled without further notification. 1.3 Survival of Terms: The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this grant agreement: 9 Liability; 10 Audits; 11 Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property; 13 Endorsement; 14 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue; 16 Data Disclosure; 19 Monitoring; and 24 Additional Program Requirements 1.4 Incur Expenses: Notwithstanding Minnesota Statutes, section 16A.41, expenditures made on or after August 15, 2022 are eligible for reimbursement. This agreement becomes effective on August 15, 2022, or the date the State obtains all required signatures under Minnesota Statutes 16B.98, subdivision 5, whichever is later. 2 Grantee’s Duties The Grantee, who is not a state employee, will: The Grantee will comply with required grants management policies and procedures set forth through Minnesota Statutes Section 16B.97, subdivision 4 (a) (1). Vendor No.0000201592 Contract No.220958 3000/R29337VH/R293211 PO No.220982 VFA Grant 154 FY23 2 The Grantee agrees to complete the program in accordance with the approved budget to the extent practicable and within the program period specified in the grant agreement. Any material change in the grant agreement shall require an amendment by the State (see Section 7.2). The Grantee is responsible for maintaining a written conflict of interest policy. Throughout the term of this agreement, the Grantee shall monitor and report any actual, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest to the State’s Authorized Representative. The Grantee shall be responsible for the administration, supervision, management, record keeping, and program oversight required for the work performed under this agreement. Complete work specified in the Project Proposal attached hereto as Exhibit A. This Project Proposal shall be a part of this grant. Highest priority is indicated in the office use only box of Exhibit A; however, any of the listed projects or a combination of the listed projects on Exhibit A, may also qualify for this grant with written approval from the State of Minnesota. Ensure all equipment acquired through this grant must be used solely for prevention, suppression and control of fire. Report GPS locations of dry hydrants or water facilities constructed under this grant to Shelly Greniger, Rural Fire Programs Assistant, 402 Southeast Eleventh Street, Grand Rapids, Minnesota 55744 or his/her successor. 3 Time The Grantee must comply with all the time requirements described in this grant contract. In the performance of this grant contract, time is of the essence. 4 Consideration and Payment 4.1 Consideration. Consideration for all services performed by Grantee pursuant to this grant agreement shall be paid by the State as follows: 4.1.1. Compensation. The Grantee will be paid in the amount not to exceed $5000.00, based on the following computation: 4.1.2. Matching Requirements. The State shall reimburse Grantee for up to 50% of the reasonable net cost of items purchased or expenditures made, in accordance with the approved project proposal. This reimbursement shall not exceed the total amount of this grant. Grant funds cannot be used by the Grantee as match or for reimbursement for any other grant or program without prior written authorization from the State’s Authorized Representative. 4.1.3 Indirect Cost Rate. The federal indirect cost rate for the State’s federal award is___. The Grantee’s indirect cost rate is ___% for this sub-award agreement. 4.1.4 Travel Expenses. Reimbursement for travel and subsistence expenses actually and necessarily incurred by the Grantee as a result of this grant contract will not exceed $00.00. THE TOTAL STATE OBLIGATION FOR ALL COMENSATION AND REIMBURSEMENTS TO GRANTEE SHALL NOT EXCEED $5000.00. Funds made available pursuant to this Agreement shall be used only for expenses incurred in performing and accomplishing the purposes and activities specified herein. Notwithstanding all other provisions of this Agreement, it is understood that any reduction or termination of funds allocated to the State may result in a like reduction to the Grantee. 4.2. Payment The State shall disburse funds to the Grantee pursuant to this agreement on a reimbursement basis. The Vendor No.0000201592 Contract No.220958 3000/R29337VH/R293211 PO No.220982 VFA Grant 154 FY23 3 Grantee shall submit payment requests with required expenditure documentation. If necessary, advance payments on grants shall be negotiated between the State and Grantee on a case-by-case basis. In order to make advance payments, the Grantee must prepare and submit a written justification to the State for approval that details specific need to utilize advance payments. A copy of the signed justification must be maintained in the grant file. All advance payments on grants over $50,000 must be reconciled within 12 months of issuance or within 60 days of the end of the grant period. 4.2.1. Invoices. The State will promptly pay the Grantee after the Grantee presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. The State will promptly pay the Grantee after the Grantee presents an itemized invoice for the services actually performed and the State's Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced services. Invoices must be submitted timely and upon completion by June 15, 2023. 4.2.2. Federal funds. Payments under this grant contract will be made from federal funds obtained by the State through the Cooperative Forestry Assistance Act of 1978, Public Law 95-313, CFDA number 10.664. The Grantee is responsible for compliance with all federal requirements imposed on these funds and accepts full financial responsibility for any requirements imposed by the Grantee’s failure to comply with federal requirements. 4.2.3. Unexpended Funds. The Grantee must promptly return to the State any unexpended funds that have not been accounted for annually in a financial report to the State due at grant closeout. 5 Conditions of Payment All services provided by the Grantee under this grant agreement must be performed to the State’s satisfaction, as determined at the sole discretion of the State’s Authorized Representative and in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules and regulations. The Grantee will not receive payment for work found by the State to be unsatisfactory or performed in violation of federal, state, or local law. 6 Authorized Representative The State's Authorized Representative is Tim Oland, Rural Fire Programs Coordinator, DNR Forestry, 402 Southeast Eleventh Street, Grand Rapids, Minnesota 55744, 218-322-2688, or his/her successor, and has the responsibility to monitor the Grantee’s performance and the authority to accept the services provided under this grant contract. If the services are satisfactory, the State's Authorized Representative will certify acceptance on each invoice submitted for payment. The Grantee’s Authorized Representative is the Fire Chief at (651) 274-6750. If the Grantee’s Authorized Representative changes at any time during this grant contract, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. 7 Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Grant Agreement Complete 7.1. Assignment. The Grantee may neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this grant agreement without the prior consent of the State and a fully executed Assignment Agreement, executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved this grant agreement, or their successors in office. 7.2. Amendments. Any amendment to this grant agreement must be in writing and will not be effective until it has been executed and approved by the same parties who executed and approved the original grant agreement, or their successors in office. 7.3. Waiver. If the State fails to enforce any provision of this grant agreement, that failure does not waive the provision or its right to enforce it. 7.4. Grant Agreement Complete. This grant agreement contains all negotiations and agreements between the State and the Grantee. No other understanding regarding this grant agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party. Vendor No.0000201592 Contract No.220958 3000/R29337VH/R293211 PO No.220982 VFA Grant 154 FY23 4 8 Subcontractors, Contracting and Bidding Requirements 8.1. The Grantee agrees that if it subcontracts any portion of this project to another entity, the agreement with the subcontractor will contain all provisions of the agreement with the State. The Grantee also agrees to comply with Title 2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 200.317 and 200.322 (if applicable-both apply to state entities only) as well as 2 CFR 200.318-321, and 2 CFR 200.323-326. 8.2. Per Minnesota Statute 471.345, grantees that are municipalities as defined in Subd. 1 must follow that Uniform Municipal Contracting Law if contraction funds from this grant contract agreement for any supplies, materials, equipment, or the rental thereof, or the construction, alteration, repair, or maintenance of real or personal property. 8.2.1. If the amount of the contract is estimated to be $10,000-25,000 the contract may be made either upon quotation or in the open market, in the discretion of the governing body. If the contract is made upon quotation, it shall be based, so far as practicable, on at least two quotations which shall be kept on file for a period of at least one year after their receipt. Alternatively, municipalities may award a contract for construction, alteration, repair, or maintenance work to the vendor or contractor offering the best value under a request for proposals as described in Minnesota Statute 16C.28, Subd. 1, paragraph a, clause 2. 8.2.2. Any services and/or materials that are expected to cost less than $10,000 do not require the solicitation of competitive quotations in accordance with 2 CFR 200.320(b). The Grantee must make an effort to equitably distribute these purchases. 9 Liability The Grantee must indemnify, save, and hold the State, its agents, and employees harmless from any claims or causes of action, including attorney’s fees incurred by the State, arising from the performance of this grant contract by the Grantee or the Grantee’s agents or employees. This clause will not be construed to bar any legal remedies the Grantee may have for the State's failure to fulfill its obligations under this grant contract. 10 Audits (State and Single) Under Minn. Stat. §16B.98, subd. 8 and 2 CFR 200.331, the Grantee books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices relevant to this grant agreement are subject to examination by the State and/or the State Auditor or Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from the end of this grant agreement. All state and local governments, colleges and universities, and non-profit organizations that expend $750,000 or more of Federal awards in a fiscal year must have a single audit according to the OMB Uniform Guidance: Cost Principles, Audit, and Administrative Awards Requirements for Federal Awards. This is $750,000 total Federal awards received from all sources. If an audit is completed, forward a copy of the report to both the State's Authorized Representative and the State Auditor. 11 Government Data Practices and Intellectual Property 11.1. Government Data Practices. The Grantee and State must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn. Stat. Ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by the State under this grant contract, and as it applies to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by the Grantee under this grant contract. The civil remedies of Minn. Stat. §13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either the Grantee or the State. If the Grantee receives a request to release the data referred to in this Clause, the Grantee must immediately notify the State. The State will give the Grantee instructions concerning the release of the data to the requesting party before the data is released. The Grantee’s response to the request shall comply with applicable law. Vendor No.0000201592 Contract No.220958 3000/R29337VH/R293211 PO No.220982 VFA Grant 154 FY23 5 11.2. Intellectual Property Rights Intellectual Property Rights Not Applicable. 11.2.1. Obligations. (A) Notification. Whenever any invention, improvement, or discovery (whether or not patentable) is made or conceived for the first time or actually or constructively reduced to practice by the Grantee, including its employees and subcontractors, in the performance of this contract, the Grantee will immediately give the State’s Authorized Representative written notice thereof, and must promptly furnish the Authorized Representative with complete information and/or disclosure thereon. (B) Representation. The Grantee must perform all acts and take all steps necessary to ensure that all intellectual property rights in the Works and Documents are the sole property of the State, and that neither Grantee nor its employees, agents, or subcontractors retain any interest in and to the Works and Documents. The Grantee represents and warrants that the Works and Documents do not and will not infringe upon any intellectual property rights of other persons or entities. Notwithstanding Clause 9, the Grantee will indemnify; defend, to the extent permitted by the Attorney General; and hold harmless the State, at the Grantee’s expense, from any action or claim brought against the State to the extent that it is based on a claim that all or part of the Works or Documents infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others. The Grantee will be responsible for payment of any and all such claims, demands, obligations, liabilities, costs, and damages, including but not limited to, attorney fees. If such a claim or action arises, or in the Grantee’s or the State’s opinion is likely to arise, the Grantee must, at the State’s discretion, either procure for the State the right or license to use the intellectual property rights at issue or replace or modify the allegedly infringing Works or Documents as necessary and appropriate to obviate the infringement claim. This remedy of the State will be in addition to and not exclusive of other remedies provided by law. 12 Workers’ Compensation The Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. §176.181, Subd. 2, pertaining to workers’ compensation insurance coverage. The Grantee’s employees and agents will not be considered State employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers’ Compensation Act on behalf of these employees and any claims made by any third party as a consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees are in no way the State’s obligation or responsibility. 13 Publicity and Endorsement 13.1. Publicity. Any publicity regarding the subject matter of this grant contract must identify the State as the sponsoring agency and must not be released without prior written approval from the State’s Authorized Representative. For purposes of this provision, publicity includes notices, informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices prepared by or for the Grantee individually or jointly with others, or any subcontractors, with respect to the program, publications, or services provided resulting from this grant contract. 13.2. Endorsement. The Grantee must not claim that the State endorses its products or services, and the Grantee must adhere to the terms of 2 CFR 200.315. 14 Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue Minnesota law, without regard to its choice-of-law provisions, governs this grant contract. Venue for all legal proceedings out of this grant contract, or its breach, must be in the appropriate state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County, Minnesota. Vendor No.0000201592 Contract No.220958 3000/R29337VH/R293211 PO No.220982 VFA Grant 154 FY23 6 15 Termination 15.1. Termination by the State. The State may immediately terminate this grant contract with or without cause, upon 30 days’ written notice to the Grantee. Upon termination, the Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for services satisfactorily performed. 15.2. Termination for Cause. The State may immediately terminate this grant contract if the State finds that there has been a failure to comply with the provisions of this grant contract, that reasonable progress has not been made or that the purposes for which the funds were granted have not been or will not be fulfilled. The State may take action to protect the interests of the State of Minnesota, including the refusal to disburse additional funds and requiring the return of all or part of the funds already disbursed. 16 Data Disclosure Under Minn. Stat. § 270C.65, Subd. 3, and other applicable law, the Grantee consents to disclosure of its social security number, federal employer tax identification number, and/or Minnesota tax identification number, already provided to the State, to federal and state tax agencies and state personnel involved in the payment of state obligations. These identification numbers may be used in the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring the Grantee to file state tax returns and pay delinquent state tax liabilities, if any. 17 American Disabilities Act The Grantee is subject to complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 (42 U.S.C. 12101 et seq.) and all applicable regulations and guidelines. The Grantee must comply with the 2010 American Disabilities Act Standards for Accessible Design. 18 Non-Discrimination Requirements No person in the United States must, on the ground of race, color, national origin, handicap, age, religion, or sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subject to discrimination under, any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. Including but not limited to: a) Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.) and DOC implementing regulations published at 15 C.F.R. Part 8 prohibiting discrimination on the grounds of race, color, or national origin under programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance; Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq.) prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sex under Federally assisted education programs or activities; b) Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended (29 U.S.C. § 794), and DOC implementing regulations published at 15 C.F.R. Part 8b prohibiting discrimination on the basis of handicap under any program or activity receiving or benefiting from Federal assistance. c) The Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended (42 U.S.C. § 6101 et seq.), and DOC implementing regulations published at 15 C.F.R. Part 20 prohibiting discrimination on the basis of age in programs or activities receiving Federal financial assistance; d) Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990 which prohibits discrimination against qualified individuals with disabilities in services, programs, and activities of public entities. e) Any other applicable non-discrimination law(s). 19 Reporting Requirements The Grantee is bound to financial and performance reporting requirements as noted in the Minnesota Statutes Section 16B.97, subdivision 4 (a) (1). Vendor No.0000201592 Contract No.220958 3000/R29337VH/R293211 PO No.220982 VFA Grant 154 FY23 7 20 Monitoring The State shall be allowed at any time to conduct periodic site visits and inspections to ensure work progress in accordance with this grant agreement, including a final inspection upon program completion. At least one monitoring visit per grant period on all state grants of over $50,000 will be conducted and at least annual monitoring visits on grants of over $250,000. Following closure of the program, the State’s authorized representatives shall be allowed to conduct post- completion inspections of the site to ensure that the site is being properly operated and maintained and that no conversion of use has occurred. 21 Invasive Species Prevention The DNR requires active steps to prevent or limit the introduction, establishment, and spread of invasive species during contracted work. The contractor shall prevent invasive species from entering into or spreading within a project site by cleaning equipment prior to arriving at the project site. If the equipment, vehicles, gear, or clothing arrives at the project site with soil, aggregate material, mulch, vegetation (including seeds) or animals, it shall be cleaned by contractor furnished tool or equipment (brush/broom, compressed air or pressure washer) at the staging area. The contractor shall dispose of material cleaned from equipment and clothing at a location determined by the DNR Contract Administrator. If the material cannot be disposed of onsite, secure material prior to transport (sealed container, covered truck, or wrap with tarp) and legally dispose of offsite. The contractor shall ensure that all equipment and clothing used for work in infested waters has been adequately decontaminated for invasive species (ex. zebra mussels) prior to being used in non-infested waters. All equipment and clothing including but not limited to waders, tracked vehicles, barges, boats, turbidity curtain, sheet pile, and pumps that comes in contact with any infested waters must be thoroughly decontaminated. 22 Pollinator Best Management Practices Habitat restorations and enhancements conducted on DNR lands and prairie restorations on state lands or on any lands using state funds are subject to pollinator best management practices and habitat restoration guidelines pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, section 84.973. Practices and guidelines ensure an appropriate diversity of native species to provide habitat for pollinators through the growing season. Current specific practices and guidelines to be followed for contract and grant work can be found here: Link to December 2014 version. 23 Certification Regarding Debarment, Suspension, Ineligibility and Voluntary Exclusion - Lower Tier Covered Transactions The prospective lower tier participant certifies, by submission of this agreement, that neither it nor its principals is presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from participation in this transaction by any Federal department or agency. Where the prospective lower tier participant is unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, such prospective participant shall attach an explanation to this agreement. 24 Recipient Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights Recipient Employee Whistleblower Rights and Requirement to Inform Employees of Whistleblower Rights (a) This award and employees working on this financial assistance agreement will be subject to the whistleblower rights and remedies in the pilot program on Award Recipient employee whistleblower protections established at 41 U.S.C. 4712 by section 828 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (Pub.L. 112-239) (b) The Award Recipient shall inform its employees in writing, in the predominant language of the workforce, of employee whistleblower rights and protections under 41 U.S.C. 4712 Vendor No.0000201592 Contract No.220958 3000/R29337VH/R293211 PO No.220982 VFA Grant 154 FY23 8 (c) The Award Recipient shall insert the substance of this clause, including this paragraph (c), in all sub awards or subcontracts over the simplified threshold. 42 CFR & 52.203-17 (as referenced in 42 CFR & 3.908-9) 1. STATE ENCUMBRANCE VERIFICATION 3. STATE AGENCY Individual certifies that funds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Stat. '' 16A.15 and 16B.98. By: ________________________________ (with delegated authority) Signed: Shelly Greniger Title: _______________________________ Date: 11/9/2022 Date: _______________________________ SWIFT Contract/PO No(s). 220958/220982 2. GRANTEE The Grantee certifies that the appropriate person(s) have executed the grant contract on behalf of the Grantee as required by applicable articles, bylaws, resolutions, or ordinances. By: _________________________________________ By: _________________________________________ Title: _____________________________________ Title: _______________________________________ Date: _____________________________________ Date: _______________________________________ Distribution: Agency Grantee HUGO FIRE DEPT State’s Authorized Representative - Photo Copy C:\Users\michele.lindau\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\7QEGL1JX\MEMO-Order Improvements and Auth Prep of Plans and Specs 20221121.docxC:\Users\michele.lindau\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\7QEGL1JX\MEMO-Order Improvements and Auth Prep of Plans and Specs 20221121.docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM Memorandum To: Honorable Mayor and City Council Bryan Bear, City Administrator From: Mark Erichson, City Engineer Date: November 21, 2022 Re: 2023 Birch Tree Ponds Area Street Improvements WSB Project No. 020855-000 On July 5, 2022, City Council authorized the preparation of a feasibility study for 2023 Birch Tree Ponds Area Street Improvements. City Council accepted the competed study at the October 17, 2022, City Council meeting and called for a Public Hearing to be held on November 21, 2022. The 2023 Birch Tree Ponds Area Street Improvements consists of partial roadway reconstruction, mill and overlay improvements, and spot curb and gutter replacement as conditions warrant within the Birch Tree Ponds subdivision. The partial reconstruction improvements will include, Foxhill Avenue North, 138th Street North, Geneva Avenue North, 135th Street North, 135th Court North, Freeland Avenue North, Freeland Court North, and Fountain Ave North of Egg Lake Road. Work on Fountain Avenue North South of Egg Lake Road will involve mill and overlay improvements. The project costs are summarized as follows: Birch Tree Ponds Area Street Improvements City of Hugo, MN Project Costs and Funding Improvements City Fund Special Assessments Total Schedule A – Surface Improvements $1,283,300 $672,900 $1,956,200 Schedule B – Storm Sewer Improvements $ 157,500 $ 157,500 Total Improvements $1,440,800 $672,900 $2,113,700 Staff will detail the proposed improvements and findings of the feasibility study with a PowerPoint presentation for the public hearing. Staff recommends approval of the resolution ordering the project and authorizing the preparation of plans and specifications for the 2023 Birch Tree Ponds Area Street Improvements. RESOLUTION NO. 2022- A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE PROJECT AND AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE 2023 BIRCH TREE PONDS AREA STREET IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to resolution of the Council adopted July 5, 2022, a report was prepared by WSB, with reference to the improvement of the Birch Tree Ponds subdivision streets including Foxhill Avenue North, 138th Street North, Geneva Avenue North, 135th Street North, 135th Court North, Freeland Avenue North, Freeland Court North, and Fountain Ave north and south of Egg Lake Road; and WHEREAS, the following improvements are proposed: Partial road reconstruction for Foxhill Avenue North, 138th Street North, Geneva Avenue North, 135th Street North, 135th Court North, Freeland Avenue North, Freeland Court North, and Fountain Ave north of Egg Lake Road. Mill and overlay improvements on Fountain Ave south of Egg Lake Road. WHEREAS, the City intends to assess benefited properties for a portion of the aforementioned improvements, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429, and WHEREAS, the City Council has received and accepted the feasibility report prepared by the City Engineer on October 17, 2022, for the 2023 Birch Tree Ponds Area Street Improvements; and WHEREAS, a resolution of the City Council adopted on the October 17, 2022, fixed a date for the Council public hearing on the proposed improvements; and WHEREAS, ten days' mailed notice and two weeks' published notice in advance of said public hearing was given and the hearing was held thereon on November 21, 2022, at which time all persons desiring to be heard were given an opportunity to be heard thereon. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO: 1. Such improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the feasibility report for the 2023 Birch Tree Ponds Area Street Improvements. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in this Council resolution adopted November 21, 2022. 3. The improvements described in the notice of public hearing and the feasibility report are hereby designated and shall be known as the 2023 Birch Tree Ponds Area Street Improvements. 4. The City Council shall authorize WSB to prepare plans and specifications of said improvements. 5. The City Council shall let the contract for all or part of the work for said improvements or order all or part of the work done by day labor or otherwise as authorized by Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.041, Subdivision 2 within one year of the date of this Resolution ordering said improvements. Resolution 2022- This resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Hugo on the 21st day of November 2022, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. ________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk Agenda Number K.1 CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Bryan Bear, City Administrator FROM: Max Gort, Associate Planner, through Rachel Juba, Community Development Director. SUBJECT: Summit Management LLC. – Rosemary Place Sketch Plan DATE: November 17, 2022, for the City Council Meeting of November 21, 2022 ZONING: General Business (C-2) COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Commercial (COM) REVIEW DEADLINE (120-days): January 7, 2023 1. PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING UPDATE: At its November 10, 2022 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed and provided comments on the sketch plan. The Commissioners generally felt comfortable with an apartment use on the commercially-zoned property, pending the approval of zoning and Comprehensive Plan amendments. The primary concerns raised by the Commissioners were the proposed wetland impacts, vehicle circulation through parking lots and proposed access points, and the compact nature of the site design. The Commissioners had concerns on the access points and the long parking lots areas that could encourage speeding and cut-through traffic. They recommended revisions to the parking lot layout and circulation to mitigate speeding and to remove the long parking lot areas. The Commissioners also had issues with the detached garage and asked whether the applicant would consider underground parking to favor a more open site design and to be consistent with the apartment to the north. They stated that the site seems to be overcrowded on the west side and asked if more of the property could be used. The applicant stated that the eastern portion of the property would likely remain recreational space as is proposed in the sketch plan, since that area is bisected by the powerlines and easement areas. The Commission wanted any development of the property to fit in with the surrounding area. 2. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA) MEETING UPDATE: At its October 18, 2022 meeting, the EDA reviewed and provided comments on the sketch plan. Page 2 2 The EDA generally agreed that a multi-family residential use on the property may be more viable than commercial uses, since the visibility is not great. They states that there is commercial along CSAH 8 and it does fulfill the vision of the City to have commercial uses along CSAH 8. They states that the property is the back side of the commercial uses and would allow residents to walk to the adjacent commercial uses. One EDA member stated that the City should evaluate apartments in the City, since it does not seem like there is a good plan to allow them. They did have questions about the detached garage spaces and asked why underground parking was not considered. The applicant states that he would like to have lower rent prices and underground parking is a large cost for construction. The EDA did not comment on the overall site plan, but said it needed more work. 3. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant, Summit Management LLC, is proposing to construct a 90-unit apartment complex on the west side of a 12.96-acre property, of which 7.75 acres are buildable. The property is located to the south of Rosemary Way N and north of Frenchman Road/CSAH 8, west of Festival Foods. The property is bisected diagonally by a 50-foot wide utility transmission line easement. The applicant is requesting review and comments on a sketch plan for development of the property with an apartment use, where current zoning and land use is commercial. A sketch plan is a way for an applicant to get feedback and unbinding comments on the plan, prior to formal submittal for approval. 4. CONCEPT PLAN: Current Zoning The property is currently zoned General Business district (C-2). The C-2 zoning district is designed to provide commercial services which are oriented toward motorists and require visibility from major roads and high volumes of traffic. Current Land Use The property is guided for Commercial (COM) use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Commercial land use designation provides for commercial, office and retail uses generally concentrated along key transportation corridors. General Layout The applicant is showing a proposed 90-unit, 3-story apartment building to be developed in the northwest corner of the parcel. The development would be roughly across from the existing Rosemary Apartments located at 4628 Rosemary Way N. Access to the development would be from Rosemary Way at the northwest and northeast corners of the proposed parking lot. Parking Page 3 3 for residents would be provided through a combination of 70 detached garage stalls and 170 surface parking spaces. The proposed apartment building is set on roughly a third of the entire property. The utility easement splits this western third of the property from the remaining eastern two thirds, which have a substantial amount of wetland coverage. Staff did not comprehensively review the site plan as it relates to the City Code or the orientation of the buildings, parking lots, or detached garaged. However, it is in staff’s opinion that the site plan could use revisions to blend in with the surrounding areas, including better locations for the detached garages. The applicant wanted to have a high level discussion with the Planning Commission on the zoning and land use. Compliance with City Code and Comprehensive Plan Although the property is guided for Commercial (COM) use in the 2040 Land Use plan, the developer intends to create a multi-family residential use. The applicant has stated that the current plan for the remaining portion of the property is to be extra land for resident walking trails and pet walking areas. However, the applicant has stated that the easterly portion of the property could be used as a commercial lot should the EDA seek additional commercial development. With the development of a residential use on this property, a zoning amendment and comprehensive plan amendment would be required. The property would need to be rezoned to the Medium-density multiple family residential district (R-5), and the land use plan would need to be amended to guide the property for high density residential (HD). The R-5 zoning district allows for a maximum density of 10 units per buildable acre, and 12 units per buildable acre with a PUD. With the current buildable acreage of 7.75 acres, the applicant could feasibly develop an apartment building with 77 units. However, the applicant is proposing to create more buildable acreage by filling wetlands on the western portion of the property, and including a pond which sits on formerly buildable land to create a new total of just under 9 buildable acres, allowing for the proposed 90 units. It is unlikely that the amount of wetland fill and impact would be approved by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP). If the plan incorporated commercial uses on the remaining portion of the property, the applicant would need to apply for a PUD and for a Comprehensive Plan amendment to the Mixed-Use (MIX) land use designation. PUDs offer flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of PUD zoning can allow for a greater variety of uses. In exchange for this flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of other, more standard zoning districts. PUD approval may be granted if the applicant can demonstrate compliance with the following criteria: 1. The establishment of PUD zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations, to create or maintain a development pattern that complies with the City's comprehensive plan. Page 4 4 2. The mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land uses could not otherwise be accomplished. 3. Variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in this chapter in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements (e.g., construction materials, landscaping, lighting, open space, etc.) that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. 4. A more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City. 5. Preservation and enhancement of natural features and open spaces, including but not limited to the width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas, development of buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint facilities and utilities. 6. Maintenance or improvement for the efficiency of public streets and utilities. 7. Establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. It is unclear how the proposed plan would meet the PUD criteria, and the proposed plan would likely change significantly with a PUD application. The applicant has stated that previous attempts of commercial development on the property have not been successful, and that the portion of more buildable property where the apartment is proposed to be located, facing Rosemary Way, is more viable for residential development than commercial. Neighboring properties to the south that are similarly zoned and guided for commercial use are currently occupied by commercial uses, generally following the spirit and intent of the land use designation to provide commercial uses along CSAH 8. If the proposed residential building were constructed on the northerly edge of the property facing Rosemary Way, the commercial uses along CSAH 8 would remain. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission discuss the potential for changing the zoning and land use designation of the property to allow for high density residential use, and whether the applicant should implement a PUD with commercial uses alongside the proposed residential use. Architecture The applicant has indicated that the design of the building would be similar to one of their existing developments in Forest Lake. The exterior of the building is proposed to be a mixture of brick and steel siding with earth tone colors. The individual apartments would feature decks and window shutters. The building would need to meet the city’s Multifamily Design Guidelines. The applicant has provided photos of their comparison property in Forest Lake for a visual representation of the architecture of the building. Page 5 5 Parks/Trails Park Dedication The developer is required to dedicate land, pay a fee, or a combination of land and fee. At the maximum allowed density of 10 units per acre, the developer is required to 17 percent of buildable acreage. The park dedication fee is $3,400 per unit. The applicant has not made their intentions for meeting park dedication requirements clear at this time. The sketch plan shows a playground and courtyard attached to the building, but it is unclear whether these would be public or used as private amenities for residents. The applicant is currently planning to incorporate walking trails within the remainder of the property to the east of the utility easement. If this area would be incorporated into the city park system, then 1.3 acres of buildable land would need to be used in order to meet the required 17 percent of buildable acreage for park dedication. However, the applicant’s narrative seems to suggest that the trail area would be kept private as a resident amenity. Changes in zoning and land use for this property would need to be evaluated by the Parks Commission for an assessment of the park system in the area and recommendations for park dedication for this property. Streets and Access The applicant’s sketch plan currently shows two access points onto the property on the northwest and northeast corner of the parking lot onto Rosemary Way. A traffic engineer may need to review the proposed access points to understand if Rosemary Way can handle the proposed traffic. Rosemary Way is a collector road and presumably can handle the additional traffic, since high traffic is anticipated for collector roads. If the applicant were to develop a PUD with commercial uses in the remaining portion of the property, additional points of access will need to be provided. Stormwater Management The applicant has not provided plans for stormwater management or water reuse. The applicant will need to develop a stormwater management plan that meets drainage requirements. This will impact the areas that can be used for buildings and development. Utilities The property is served by city sewer and water. The sewer and water system can handle the proposed land use changes. 5. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONS: Due to constraints on the property such as existing wetlands that are proposed to be filled, it is not certain what the total buildable area will be in the plan review process. It is unclear in the Page 6 6 sketch plan whether the applicant would be willing to move forward building fewer units than what is proposed in order to satisfy density requirements. Staff understands that previous attempts to market for commercial uses on this specific property have been unsuccessful. Further, the adjacent properties immediately to the south are fulfilling the vision of a strong commercial corridor along CSAH 8. Staff recommends discussion on the following: • Rezoning and re-designating the use of the property to allow for high density residential, moving away from the original plan for commercial use on the property. • Creating a true mixed-use PUD with residential and commercial uses The applicant is requesting review and comments on a sketch plan for the properties showing the 90 unit apartment building. The applicant would like comments on the following: • Whether residential use would be possible considering current zoning and land use designation. • The use of the east end of the property for commercial PUD versus the planned recreation and walking space. • Whether the plan should incorporate commercial development ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Existing Zoning Map 3. Existing 2040 Land Use Map 4. Applicants Narrative Dated October 12, 2022 5. Applicants Sketch Plan 6. Architectural Rendering Frenchman Road Everton Avenue NorthV ic to r P a th N o r th Rosemary Way North Private Road 149th Street North Prov e nc e Wa y Nort hMercantile Drive NorthLeopold LaneFrenchman Road Rosemary Place Location MapHugo, MN Parcel Boundary selection Roads Hugo Border Parcel Boundary ¯0 100Feet1 in = 333 feet Document Path: S:\Mapping\Emily\LocationSite Maps\2022\Rosemary Place.mxdSite Frenchman Road Everton Avenue NorthV ic to r P a th N o r th Oneka Parkway North149th Street NorthRosemary W a y N o r th Private Road Victor Hugo Boulevard NorthValjean Boulevard North F arn h a m A v e n u e N orth 150th Street North Victor PathEmpress Avenue NorthProvence Way North C o se tte L a n e N o rth Leopold LaneFrenchman Road Rosemary Place Existing ZoningHugo, MN Subject Parcel Right of Way Roads Parcel B oundaryZoning Distric ts (LA) Long Term Agricultural (AG) Agricultural (RR) Rural Residential (R-1) Large Lot Single FamilyResidential(R-3) Single Family DetachedResidential(CR-3) Central Residential (R-4) Low Density M ultipl eFamily Residential(R-5) Medium DensityMultiple Family Residential(NS) Neighborhood Service (RC-1) RestrictedCommercial(C-1) Central Business (C-2) General Business (FCB) Future CentralBusiness(BP) Busi ness Park (RI-1) Restricted Industrial (I-3) General Industrial (FUS) Future Urban Service (PUD) Planned UnitDevelopmentWater ¯ 0 500Feet 1 in = 500 feet Site Frenchman Road Everton Avenue NorthV ic to r P a th N o r th Oneka Parkway North149th Street NorthRosemary W a y N o r th Private Road Victor Hugo Boulevard NorthValjean Boulevard North 150th Street North Victor PathEmpress Avenue NorthProvence Way North C o se tte L a n e N o rth Leopold LaneFrenchman Road Rosemary Place 2040 Land Use MapHugo, MN Subj ect ParcelRight of WayRoadsParcel BoundaryLandUseAgricultural (AG)Large Lot Residential(LL)Very Low Density(VLD )Low DensityResidential - (LD)Medium DensityResidential (MD )High Densi tyResidential (HD)Business Park (BP)Commercial (COM)Industri al (IND )Mixed Use (MIXPublic/Quasi-Publi c(PQ) ¯ 0 500Feet 1 in = 500 feet Site Page 1 of 6 Rosemary Place Project Narrative Summit Management, the Applicant, is a renowned property management and development firm that owns and operates several properties throughout the state of Minnesota. With over 30 years of experience developing multi-family properties, Summit Management has a proven track record in building and professionally managing high quality housing. Summit serves thousands of residents annually, and prides itself on providing exceptional management services and outstanding properties and amenities. Summit Management is proud to be a current, active member of the City of Hugo through its Hugo Estates Community and looks forward to participating in the growth of the City through the new Rosemary Place development. The proposed Rosemary Place project will bring in a vibrant multi-family presence, consisting of a state of the art 90-unit, three story apartment building. The proposed location is currently a vacant, commercially zoned lot. Summit Management plans to build 90 multi-family units at a density of 10 units per buildable acre (see Site Plan, attached as Exhibit A for notes and calculations). The Applicant would like to note that it does have a possible commercial PUD lot remaining on the East side of the property, which could be used if the EDA is seeking additional commercial development. Otherwise, the current planned use for that lot is extra land for a resident pet walk and/or walking trail. The building will be designed similarly to Summit Management’s Arbor Ridge Luxury Apartments in Forest Lake (see Exhibit B). The exterior materials of the apartment building will be a mixture of brick, steel siding, trim and window shutters, with decks and screening incorporated around the entire building. The colors will consist of earth tones that complement the palette of the surrounding neighborhood. Some of the proposed uses and amenities of the 90-unit apartment building include the following: • Spacious, bright apartments • Full kitchens with all appliances in every unit • Washer and dryer in every unit • Maintenance of apartments, common spaces and all appliances • High speed internet • Utilities including gas, electric, water, waste and recycling • Individual climate control in every apartment • Community Room • Exercise Room • Outdoor patio with grills and lounge space • Outdoor fitness area Summit Management looks forward to bringing this project to the City of Hugo and fulfilling its continued commitment to providing outstanding properties and amenities for its residents. Page 2 of 6 Exhibit A Rosemary Place Plan Page 3 of 6 Exhibit B REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOS * Note: All photos contained in this EXHIBIT B are of Arbor Ridge Luxury Apartments, 1700 8th St SE, Forest Lake, MN 55025. Page 4 of 6 Page 5 of 6 Page 6 of 6 WETLAND-6 = 5,479 SF WETLAND-7 = 10,366 SF WETLAND-5 = 3,139 SF WETLAND-3 = 5,314 SF EXISTING POND = 28,050 SF TOTAL PROPOSED FILLED WETLAND = 24,298 SF NEW BUILDABLE AREA = 390,084 SF (8.95 ACRES) WETLAND CALCULATIONS TARGET BUILDABLE AREA = 392,040 SF (9 ACRES) TARGET PROPOSED FILLED WETLAND = 54,304 SF WETLAND-3 = 2,037 SF ADDITIONAL WETLANDCALCULATIONS TOTAL PROPOSED FILLED WETLAND & EXISTING POND = 54,385 SF NEW BUILDABLE AREA = 392,121 SF (9 ACRES) POND CALCULATIONS TOTAL EXISTING POND = 28,050 SF EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA = 337,736 SF (7.75 ACRES)13'-0 " POSSIBLE PARK 111/17/2022 3:31 PMMichele LindauSu Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa12345678910111213 14 15 16 17 18 1920 21 22 23 24 25 2627 28 29 30November 2022Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa1234567891011 12 13 14 15 16 1718 19 20 21 22 23 2425 26 27 28 29 30 31December 2022November 2022Oct 3031Nov 123455:00pm Kevin MagnusonMeet and Greet (Miron Farm) 67891011127:00pm City CouncilElection Day (United States)6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning CommVeteran's Day (United States)131415161718195:00pm Commissioner Interviews 5:00pm Board of Canvass (Council Chambers) 5:30pm EDA6:30pm Hist Comm7:00pm Parks Comm202122232425267:00pm City CouncilThanksgiving Day - City Offices Closed (United States)27282930Dec 123SUNDAYMONDAYTUESDAYWEDNESDAYTHURSDAYFRIDAYSATURDAY 211/17/2022 3:31 PMMichele LindauSu Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa1234567891011 12 13 14 15 16 1718 19 20 21 22 23 2425 26 27 28 29 30 31December 2022Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa12345678 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 2829 30 31January 2023December 2022Nov 27282930Dec 123456789107:00pm City Council5:00pm Santa Party (Hugo Peder Pederson Pavilion) 6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning Comm111213141516175:30pm Holiday Party (Hugo Peder Pederson Pavilion) 181920212223247:00pm City Council5:30pm EDA6:30pm Hist Comm7:00pm Parks Comm6:30pm BOZA7:00pm Planning CommChristmas Eve (United States)25262728293031Christmas Day (United States)Christmas Holiday (Observed) (United States)New Year's Eve (United States)SUNDAYMONDAYTUESDAYWEDNESDAYTHURSDAYFRIDAYSATURDAY