Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPC PACKET 111022 � �V Agenda EST.w06 Hugo Planning Commission Thursday, November 10, 2022 Hugo City Hall 7:00 PM A. ROLL CALL: Andress, Arcand, Derr, Kleissler, Lessard, Petty B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. October 27, 2022 D. PUBLIC HEARING 1. Xcel Energy—Site Plan, CUP Amendment, Variance, and Easement Vacation for Hugo Training Center expansion project located at 13620 Fenway Boulevard North E. NEW BUSINESS 1. Summit Management, LLC. —Sketch Plan for Rosemary Place F. OLD BUSINESS G. ADJOURNMENT If you need accommodations for the Planning Commission meeting please contact Rachel Juba at (651)762-6304 or riuba@ci.hugo.mn.us,thank you. Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of Thursday, October 27, 2022 Chair Kleissler called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. PRESENT: Andress, Arcand, Derr, Kleissler, Petty ABSENT: Lessard STAFF: Bryan Bear, City Administrator Max Gort, Associate Planner Pledge of Allegiance. Approval of Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of September 22, 2022 Commissioner Arcand made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Petty to approve minutes for the meeting of September 22, 2022. Ayes: Andress, Arcand, Kleissler, Petty Abstain: Derr Motion carried. Public Hearing: TPP, LLC, c/o Summit Management, LLC—Site Plan, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Zoning Amendment, CUPs, Variance, and Minor Subdivision for Apartments and Manufactured Home Community Expansion Staff provided a background on the proposal to expand the existing manufactured home community, named Hugo Estates, and to construct a 54-unit apartment building. Several land use applications were submitted for the two parcels that were purchased for this project. The first was to change the land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan from Medium Density Residential (MD) and Industrial (IND) to High Density Residential (HD). The second was to rezone the properties from Low Density Multi- Family Residential (R-4) and General Industrial (1-3) to Medium Density Multi-Family Residential (R-5). Two conditional use permits were requested to allow for the apartment use and for the manufactured home community use respectively. A variance was requested to for the apartment building to reach 39 feet in height, where a maximum of 35 feet is required by ordinance. A minor subdivision was requested to have the apartments on a separate parcel from the manufactured home community. The site plan for the properties shows an approximately 19,500 square foot three story apartment building with detached garage parking. The building is located on the western portion of the site and the parking lot is on the east side of the building. Further to the east, the site plan shows for an addition of 16 "double-wide" manufactured homes with attached garages on the front. Generally, the October 27, 2022 PC Minutes Page 2 site plan proposal meets requirements in the City Code and Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommended approval of the variance for the building's height, finding that there are practical difficulties in meeting the ordinance standard. Staff will be working with the applicant to change aspects of their site plan before the permitting process such as landscaping, lighting, trails and sidewalks, building architecture, and stormwater management. Generally, staff was of the opinion that the applicant's proposal keeps with the vision of the comprehensive plan, and recommended approval of the applications for Hugo Estates apartment building and manufactured home community expansion. Members of the applicants' development team were in attendance and addressed the Planning Commission. Erin Lambert, owner of Hugo Estates and Danielle Hoffman, attorney with Summit Management gave a presentation detailing the background of the company's management of the manufactured home community and their vision to expand. The presentation showed renderings of the apartment building and new manufactured homes. The presenters reiterated their goals for the project, and that conversations are happening with the Hugo Good Neighbors Food Shelf to create pedestrian access to Francesca Avenue. Additional members of the development team in attendance were introduced: David Majchrzak of Cole Group Architects, Bryan Miller of Larson Engineering, and Jaime Scheerz of Summit Management. Commissioner Arcand asks how many trees along the north property line bordering the Peloquin Industrial Park will remain. Lambert responds that as many as possible will remain, but some will be taken out per the landscape plan. Commissioner Arcand asks if the manufactured home community expansion will be allowed. Associate Planner Gort responds that the zoning amendment application is to allow for the manufactured homes to be built on the parcel at a higher density. City Administrator Bear adds that other plans have been proposed for this parcel in the past, but this one is the best in staff's view. Commissioner Andress asks how wide the road extending to the manufactured homes will be, and whether emergency vehicles will be able to perform their duties. Mr. Miller responds that the road will be wider than a typical driveway at 30 feet. Commissioner Andress asks a follow up question about storage for snow removal, and Mr. Miller points to the green space between the manufactured homes and stormwater pond. Bear points out that the illustration on-screen at this time was not completely to scale and did not show the rendered drawing all the way to the east end of the property. Chair Kleissler asks about the adjacent residential development at Oneka Lake Reserve and its respective park dedication, whether the park will remain if the Hugo Estates expansion doesn't go through. Bear responds that Oneka Lake Reserve is zoned and approved for townhome development, but implementation is dependent on a developer's building decisions which include the park. Chair Kleissler opened the Public Hearing at 7:34 PM John Peloquin, owner of the neighboring Peloquin Industrial Park, asks about the stormwater management plan and whether the water will be draining to the industrial park and its drainage ditch. October 27,2022 PC Minutes Page 3 Mr. Peloquin stated that Public Works Director Scott Anderson reviewed the ditch and its shallow level, which causes Mr. Peloquin to be concerned about the ditch flooding. Mr. Miller stated that runoff from the apartment is brought into the retention pond, which is sized for a certain storm event and that any overflow would be directed to the ditch, but additional runoff would not be directed to the ditch. Bear stated that the city stormwater requirements manage sites for volume and rate control, but that the comment from Mr. Peloquin is well taken and will be directed to the Public Works department. Commissioner Arcand asks for clarification on whether the water within the stormwater pond recharges the aquifer. Bear states that the retention pond is designed to recharge groundwater stores, and that in a large storm event the pond is designed to slowly release water into drainage ditches. Chair Kleissler asks if revisions to the site plan which have not been finalized are concerning to staff. Ms. Hoffman responded that staff's conditions are agreeable, and that some revisions are already in progress. Commissioner Petty asks where pedestrian access to Francesca Avenue through the Food Shelf property will be. Ms. Hoffman pointed to the location of a sewer easement which is being considered, and Bear states that there is no city property involvement, and therefore the applicant will be working exclusively with the food shelf to create any pedestrian access. Sandra Beck, of 6125 151s'Street N, said that it sounded like trees would be cut down similarly to the plans of Oneka Lake Reserve, and was concerned with a lack of vegetation. Bear highlights the row of landscaping along the north end of the property line, and states their purpose as screening from the Peloquin Industrial Park. Commissioner Petty asked where the linear pond that staff recommended the removal of is located. Bear pointed it out on the site plan, but that it is a separate body from the ditch along Highway 61 that Mr. Peloquin was referencing. Stephanie Metzler, of 6119 151St Street N, states concern of trespassing from residents in the existing manufactured home community onto her property, and states that a wall had been proposed in the past. Ms. Metzler stated that residents had created a path to a portion of her property on the other side of the neighborhood's stormwater pond, where they had been participating in illicit activity. Ms. Scheerz, who oversees operations within the community, states that this is the first they had been hearing of this concern and asked how recent it was. Ms. Metzler stated that the most recent occurrence was at the beginning of this summer. Ms. Scheerz stated that the operations staff will take steps to prevent future occurrences and will explore options to address the issue with the new construction. No one else spoke. Chair Kleissler closed the Public Hearing at 7:48 PM October 27,2022 PC Minutes Page 4 Commissioner Arcand believes the plan fits nicely with the surrounding area and provides a nice transition area between the residential community and the industrial park. Commissioner Derr stated that the aesthetic improvements in Hugo Estates under Summit Management's ownership have been noticeable. Chair Kleissler stated the proposal is a good use of the oddly-shaped property, and that the applicants did a nice job overall. No more discussion. Chair Kleissler recommended separate voting on each application. Commissioner Derr made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Petty, to approve the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. All ayes. Motion Carried. Commissioner Petty made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Andress, to approve the Zoning Amendment. All ayes. Motion Carried. Commissioner Petty made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Derr, to approve the two Conditional Use Permits. All ayes. Motion Carried. Commissioner Petty made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Derr, to approve the Variance. All ayes. Motion Carried. Commissioner Petty made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Derr, to approve the Minor Subdivision. All ayes. Motion Carried. New Business: Peter Stalland, Knute Development, LLC. —Sketch Plan for Oneka Commons Staff provided background on a sketch plan for a proposed use on a 92-acre property being developed into 8 parcels. The applicant, Peter Stalland, is requesting informal nonbinding comments on the plan to construct two 70-unit apartment buildings on a portion of property facing CSAH 8, and that is guided and zoned for Commercial use in the Comprehensive Plan and City Code. There are areas on the east side of the property which are guided for Mixed Use and are defined within the Downtown Plan, which are the only areas in the Comprehensive Plan which can handle significant density. The sketch plan has proposed extensions of Victor Path and Fenway Boulevard. In order to have the applicant's proposed 20 units per acre with the apartment project, they need to both locate to an area guided for Mixed Use in the Comprehensive Plan and demonstrate a mix of related uses on the same parcel. Since the applicant is proposing that each parcel be developed separately, staff is of the opinion that the sketch plan does not meet the definition of Mixed Use, and therefore the existing land use and zoning designations should be followed when proceeding with this project. Staff recommended that the Planning Commission discuss the following topics: maintaining existing land use designation, considering alternative locations on the 92-acre property where an apartment project could be October 27,2022 PC Minutes Page 5 located, and whether a large apartment complex could be integrated into a mixed-use development. Staff recalled comments received by the EDA which placed importance on preserving the existing commercial designations along CSAH 8. Commissioner Andress stated that the property features a very desirable corner with the intersection of CSAH 8 and TH 61, and that he would like to see a proposal that blends in well and achieves the goals of the Downtown Plan. Commissioner Petty stated that she is trying to visualize how the proposed apartments would look when viewed from CSAH 8. Bear stated that the discussion topics staff posed are to consider such issues. Commissioner Petty mentioned an apartment building in Forest Lake which is located very close to a frontage road, and has concerns about encroachment on major roadways. The applicant, Peter Stalland approached the Planning Commission stating that he wanted to give comments from a development perspective. Stalland stated that it is too expensive and risky to develop the property all at once, and believes that an apartment project is the best starting point for developing the whole property. Stalland showed the Commissioners a redesigned sketch plan, which had not been reviewed by staff, that shows the building orientation flipped and located closer to the corner of CSAH 8 and TH 61. Stalland stated that areas further to the southwest of the property wouldn't work as well for the apartment project since the soil isn't conducive to underground parking. Commissioner Arcand asks about the topography of the southerly areas on the property which are guided for low-density residential. Stalland says that the necessary modifications would be too expensive to construct his desired product. Commissioner Arcand replies that he is not in favor of apartments being located right on CSAH 8, which he feels is better suited for commercial frontage. Chair Kleissler says that having standalone apartments on CSAH 8 would significantly disrupt the surrounding area. Commissioner Derr adds that the existing Rosemary apartments are located behind several commercial developments relative to the county highway. Commissioner Arcand states that a lot of time and energy was put into the Comprehensive Plan process, and that the decision to alter the plan should not be taken lightly. Commissioner Derr adds that the residents favored commercial use along the county highway during that process. Chair Kleissler asked the Commissioners to give feedback on the idea of incorporating the apartments in a Mixed-Use development. Commissioner Petty stated that she would not be in favor of a long wall encroaching on TH 61. Commissioner Arcand stated that he would not be pleased without commercial uses on the corner of CSAH 8 and TH 61. Stalland agrees with the Commissioners that small-scale commercial on that corner would be best, and that he would be interested in making Comprehensive Plan and zoning amendments although it is financially intensive. Commissioner Petty asks if the apartments could be moved to the south of the commercially designated areas along the county highway. Stalland responds that the option has been considered but the extension of infrastructure would be intensive. October 27,2022 PC Minutes Page 6 Bear states that the frontage roads proposed on the sketch plan are hypothetical and can be moved in any number of configurations. Bear adds that the underlying zoning in areas guided Mixed-Use is commercial, that any project involving a residential use would require a zoning amendment, and a discussion would need to be had about the specifics of uses. Gort states that staff encouraged the applicant to factor in how any horizontal mixed-use buildings would relate to each other when designing a mixed-use plan, and Bear adds that the applicant may appreciate more feedback on the mix of uses. Commissioner Petty stated that she better understands the scope of the uses knowing that commercial buildings are incorporated and related to the apartments, recommending more detailed renderings. Commissioner Andress relates the concern about the apartments encroaching on the Hardwood Creek Trail to an example in White Bear Lake, and wants top make sure that the trail and highway aren't dominated by the building. Commissioner Derr agrees that a rendering of the view from adjacent roadways would be useful, and that the land is set lower than the road in some areas along CSAH 8. Commissioner Petty responds that the land isn't as low on this property than on other stretches of the highway. Chair Kleissler stated that she would like to see commercial uses closer to the roads with the apartments further back, but is still concerned with the apartment wall aligning with Highway 61, suggesting there may be a way of moving the "L" shape line away from the highway. Gort responds highlighting the Multifamily Design Guidelines requiring articulated facades, stating that a wall along the highway would not be flat. Commissioner Arcand asks about Stalland's plans for the commercial uses considering his professional focus on apartment development. Stalland points to architectural consistency across the proposed buildings, which would enable his real estate broker Bill Lentsch, who was also in attendance, to more easily sell the commercial uses. Commissioner Arcand asks Lentsch about his interest in the commercial uses. Lentsch stated that he receives several inquiries about commercial development, but there is some difficulty in creating solid plans without existing infrastructure. Commissioner Arcand asks why the reluctance is still there today, and Lentsch stated that City staff has been encouraging development of the entire 92-acre property at once. Lentsch recalled the AUAR and grant money he received, but ultimately declined since the funds were too large for him to properly use. Furthermore, Lentsch stated that remodeling the floodway per terms outlined by FEMA was difficult, and that stormwater management for the entire property would be difficult, which ultimately led to interest falling off from potential developers. Commissioner Petty said that the applicant's architectural rendering looked nice. Commissioner Arcand stated that the existing land use fits well on the corner parcel, and asks staff when the percentage of commercial to residential uses is to be decided. Bear responds that a lot of discretion can be given to the Planning Commission during the process, reiterating the challenge of October 27,2022 PC Minutes Page 7 rezoning and changing land use designation in the Comprehensive Plan. Bear stated currently, the highest allowed density for residential use is 12 units per acre, but that may need to change considering market trends demanding higher density, as well as a changing appetite in the community. Stalland asks if a new ordinance would need to be created with a rezoning of the property. Bear states that in an area designated for mixed-use, rezoning to a PUD district is usually anticipated. However, in areas guided for commercial use, there is no zoning district to allow 20 units per acre. Stalland asks about the Metropolitan Council's guide for density within the City, and Bear responds that the city- wide goal is 3 units per acre, and that the city needs to demonstrate how that goal is achieved when allowing a 20 unit-per-acre project. Commissioner Petty asks for clarification on how the mixed-use area could be extended. Bear states that he's heard some discussion around apartments in the mixed-use area, and that depending on where the extended frontage road ends up in the final plans that some options to the south may be available. Chair Kleissler asks the commissioners how they feel about a jump in density. Bear states that this won't be the last time that an apartment project with this density will be requested, and that the Planning Commission may want to consider an approach to high-density apartments in the future. Stalland states that the market is heavily demanding more multifamily housing, and that the cost of utilities can't justify construction at 12 units per acre. Chair Kleissler asks if the applicant is requesting any further specific feedback. Stalland states that he wants to know if they're interested in higher density and if they can give him a preferred location. Commissioner Arcand states that his first choice for a location would be on Oneka Parkway but further away from CSAH 8. Chair Kleissler says that the location in the sketch plan is her least favorite, but not sure about a favorite. Commissioner Petty states that she is comfortable with a density of 20 units per acre, but that the Planning Commission and City need to be strategic about where it is placed. Commissioner Arcand states that he wants to consider how the "rural feel" of Hugo can preserved with high density. Bear replies that high-level questions like that start with the Comprehensive Plan, and that the discussion shouldn't be had without interest from the Planning Commission. Lentsch asks the commissioners what they have heard from the community in terms of what they would like to see in commercially-designated areas. Several commissioners respond that the number one item is restaurants, with some demand for smaller retail uses like drug stores. October 27,2022 PC Minutes Page 8 Old Business Bear mentions that Commissioner interviews have been scheduled during November, and that new Planning Commissioners may be involved soon. Chair Kleissler asks for meeting dates in November and December. Gort responded with the dates on November 10th, December 81", and December 22nd. Adjournment Commissioner Petty made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Arcand, to adjourn the meeting at 9:03 PM. All ayes. Motion Carried. Respectfully Submitted, Max Gort, Associate Planner CITY OF HUGO Community Development Planning and Zoning Staff Report TO: Hugo Planning Commission FROM: Max Gort, Associate Planner, though Rachel Juba, Community Development Director. SUBJECT: Xcel Energy — Site Plan, CUP Amendment, Variance, and Easement Vacation for site located at 13620 Fenway Boulevard North DATE: November 4, 2022, for the Planning Commission meeting of November 10, 2022 ZONING: Business Park(BP) COMP PLAN LAND USE: Business Park(BP) 120-DAY REVIEW DEADLINE: December 23, 2022 1. DESCRPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant, Xcel Energy, is requesting approval of a site plan to construct a two-story approximately 32,000 square foot building as well as an outdoor training facility. The outdoor training facility will be an expansion of the existing facility on site, which is allowed by a conditional use permit. The applicant is requesting an amendment to their conditional use permit (CUP) to allow for the expanded facility. A variance is being requested to allow for the height of structures (poles and lattice tower) within the training facility, which exceed the maximum 50 feet allowed by ordinance. Since the applicant is proposing to impact a wetland on site located within a drainage and utility easement, they are requesting an easement vacation. 2. CONTEXT: Surrounding Land Use and Zoning The surrounding properties to the north,west, and south are zoned Business Park(BP) and Large Lot Single-Family Residential (R-1), although the singular property zoned R-1 is occupied by Clearwater Creek Preserve, a passive park, rather than residential use. The properties to the east are zoned General Industrial (I-3)and are occupied by industrial uses. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan guides the properties to the north, west, and south for Business Park (BP) and Public/Quasi-Public (PQ) use, and the properties to the east are guided for Industrial (IND)use. Xcel Energy— Site Plan, CUP Amendment, Variance, Easement Vacation Existing Site Characteristics The property is roughly 28 acres in size. The site has some sloping terrain, with upland areas and a slope downward toward the west. The southern half of the site, approximately 12.5 acres, is occupied by two existing buildings and outdoor training area. There are wetlands on the portion of property where the new construction is to take place. 3. BACKGROUND: There is a training facility owned and operated by Xcel Energy on property within the Bald Eagle Industrial Park. The original site plan and CUP were reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission and City Council in 2012, amended in 2017 to allow for a 12,000 square foot building addition, and again in 2021 to construct additional training facilities. A variance was approved by the Planning Commission and City Council to allow for the construction of training transmission poles which were higher than the 50-foot maximum height allowed by ordinance. The applicant is proposing to construct multiple new training facilities at the property they have named Hugo Training Center (HTC). The outdoor facilities are an extension of outdoor training transmission lines as well as a new training substation. The transmission lines will feature 4 different lines, ranging in height from 43 feet to 105 feet. The training substation will simulate real life substations at 5 different voltages, and will be built on an approximately 1.65-acre gravel pad with a galvanized steel perimeter fence. The new transmission lines and the substation will both be non-energized, minimizing hazards to both employees and surrounding properties. The applicant estimates that the project will be completed by the end of 2023. The second proposed project is a two-story, approximately 40,000 square foot building which will house relocated training activities that previously took place in Minneapolis, MN, which include laboratories and classrooms. The applicant is proposing a significant amount of employee traffic using the building during peak training event times. 4. ANALYSIS: A. LEVEL OF DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING The City's discretion in approving or denying a site plan is limited to whether or not the proposed project complies with the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance requirements. If it meets these standards, the City must then approve the site plan. The City's discretion in approving or denying a conditional use permit amendment is limited to whether or not the proposed application meets the standards outlined in the Zoning Ordinance. If it meets these standards, the City must approve the conditional use permit. The City's discretion in approving or denying a variance is limited to whether or not the proposed project meets the standards in the Zoning Ordinance for a variance. The City has 2 Xcel Energy— Site Plan, CUP Amendment, Variance, Easement Vacation a higher level of discretion with a variance because the burden of proof is on the applicant to show that they meet the standards in the ordinance. B. SITE PLAN Building Setbacks The BP zoning district requires a minimum 30-foot front yard setback, a minimum 40-foot side yard setback, and a minimum 30-foot rear yard setback. The proposal meets all of these requirements Building Height The BP zoning district has a maximum building height of 50 feet. The proposed building is 38 feet in height and meets the ordinance standard. The applicant is proposing to construct training transmission lines which exceed the maximum building height, requiring a variance. A. VARIANCE FROM BUILDING HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS The applicant is proposing to construct the outdoor training transmission poles at varying heights, with a maximum of 105 feet, where 50 feet is required by ordinance. Staff used the standards outlined in Section 90-38 of the City Code and found the following: (1)Law. The variance as requested is permissible by law. The proposed variance is permissible by law. (2)Practical Difficulties. The applicant for a variance shall establish that there are practical difficulties in complying with the provisions of the zoning regulations. The term "Practical Difficulties"as used in the granting of a variance means: a. Reasonable Use. The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning ordinance and; By adding to the existing training facilities, the applicant is proposing to use the property in a reasonable manner. The proposed transmission lines are similar to existing, operable transmission lines and utility poles located throughout the City. It is in staff s opinion that allowing for the training transmission lines to be of similar height to existing energized utility poles is a reasonable use. b. Unique Circumstances. The plight of property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner and; 3 Xcel Energy— Site Plan, CUP Amendment, Variance, Easement Vacation The property is surrounded by mature wooded areas to the west and south, effectively screening the existing training facilities from adjacent land uses, specifically the residential uses to the south. The wooded areas and location of the proposed building would provide screening to the transmission lines that would not be possible if the transmission lines were placed in another location on the property. Additionally, the proposed transmission line consists of utility poles that are similar to existing live operational utility poles that are of similar heights. c. Character of Neighborhood. The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The property is zoned Business Park and is surrounded by other, existing industrial uses. Additionally, the property is buffered and screened from adjacent residential developments by existing wooded areas, as well as the screening provided by the proposed training building in front of the training poles relative to the road. It is in staffs opinion that the requested variance will not alter the essential character of the surrounding business park area. Staff is of the opinion there are practical difficulties in meeting the ordinance standards constructing the new training transmission lines. (3)Spirit and Intent. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this chapter and with the policies of the City's Comprehensive Plan. The spirit and intent of the ordinance restricting building height is to ensure that neighboring properties are not dominated by excessively tall structures, and that the essential character of the surrounding area is not disrupted. Due to the screening provided by mature wooded areas to the west and south, and the proposed training building on the east side of the property, the requested variance meets the spirit and intent of the ordinance. (4)Prohibited Use. The variance, if granted, shall not have the effect of allowing any use prohibited in the district. The training center is a permitted use in the Business Park zoning district. (5)Hazard Consideration. The variance, if granted, shall not permit a lower degree of flood protection than required by this chapter. The variance shall be determined the minimum necessary, considering the flood hazard, to afford relief, and the variance shall not be issued within any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. The property is not located within a FEMA designated floodplain. (6)Septic and Well Compliance. The sewage treatment system and water system of the subject property is in compliance with city and state codes. The property is served by City sewer and water. 4 Xcel Energy— Site Plan, CUP Amendment, Variance, Easement Vacation It is in staff s opinion that the application meets the criteria outlined in the City Code to approve a variance. Building Coverage and Lot Coverage The ordinance limits lot area to be covered by a building to 40%and lot area to be covered by impervious surface to 80%. The site plan meets the requirements. Landscaping Section 90-181 of the Zoning Ordinance provides landscaping requirements for developments. The site plan includes tree and shrub locations and species. The applicant is proposing 68 overstory deciduous trees, 18 coniferous trees, 15 ornamental trees, and 295 shrubs. The ordinance requires 36 ornamental trees for this site based on perimeter and building area,and the 15 provided ornamental trees do not meet this requirement.However, the ordinance does provide calculation for equivalent planting materials, allowing substitutions to be made for the minimum landscape requirements. The applicant's landscape plan provides for well over the required amount of overstory deciduous trees and shrubs, with the intent of providing screening to the outdoor training facilities. Staff is comfortable with the substitution on the minimum requirement for ornamental tree plantings with the proposed excess of deciduous trees and shrubs, and will provide this as a condition in the CUP amendment resolution. Lighting The ordinance requires lighting to consist of cut-off fixtures and for light cast on adjacent property and roads not to exceed 1/2 foot candle measured at the property line or 1-foot candle measured at the street's centerline. The ordinance also required the light fixtures, whether pole mounted or wall mounted to be cut-off fixtures. The applicant has not yet provided staff with a lighting plan, but has stated that any pole or wall-mounted lighting will be consistent with that of the existing facility on site. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to ensure that their lighting plan meets requirements. Fencing and Screening The applicant is proposing fencing around the proposed substation and transmission line and to the south portion of the building to prevent unauthorized access. The fencing around the substation is proposed to be 10 feet high, and constructed with a mixture of black wrought iron and black chain link, consistent with fencing around the rest of the site. Remaining screening will be provided with the mature wooded areas to the west and south of the property. Any exterior mechanical equipment for the building will need to be adequately screened with material consistent with the rest of the building design. The applicant has stated that mechanical equipment will either be located at ground level or the interior of the building, and that a screening plan will be submitted as the plans for mechanical equipment layout 5 Xcel Energy— Site Plan, CUP Amendment, Variance, Easement Vacation progresses. Staff will continue to work with the applicant the ensure that any exterior mechanical equipment will be adequately screened. Streets and Access The existing facilities on the property are adequately served with two access points onto Fenway Boulevard N. The applicant is proposing an additional access point to the north of the proposed new building, as well as a widening of the existing curb cut near the existing building to 33 feet. The proposed new and modified access points meet City Code requirements. Parking Per City Code the parking required for the building and facility is 186 parking stalled. The applicant has stated at the peak of training on the site more parking stalls may be needed. The plans show a total of 317 parking spaces. The applicant is proposed to construct 229 stalls and shows 110 parking stalls as deferred parking. The deferred parking would be constructed at any time deemed necessary by the City, if a parking problem occurs. The parking spaces meets the ordinance standard. Trails There is a City trail along Fenway Boulevard N. The applicant is not proposing to impact this trail or provide any additional trails. If the trail is impacted, the applicant will be responsible for replacement of the trail. Architecture, Building Material The applicant has provided floor plans,elevations,and renderings of the proposed building. The architecture of the building will be subject to the Commercial and Industrial Design Guidelines adopted by the City in 2011. The guidelines encourage four-sided design with at least one change in wall planes and roof lines to provide depth. The applicant has proposed a mixture of concrete panels and wood-like metal materials to create a light and dark contrast across the facades of all four sides of the building. The applicant is at 25% for the metal material and will need to reduce it to 20%per the commercial and industrial design standards. In general, the applicant has done a good job meeting the intent of the commercial and industrial design guidelines. Staff has requested that the applicant provide material samples to ensure that the proposed metal building material, and that the color, texture, and design of the other building materials are attractive and aesthetically pleasing. Signage The applicant is proposing a wall sign to be placed on the front facade of the building. Sec. 90-265(h)(1)(a) restricts single-tenant wall signs to a maximum of 10 percent of the gross wall area of the front fagade. The applicant will need to provide dimensions of the wall sign prior to issuance of a sign permit. The applicant has mentioned the possibility of constructing one or more directional monument signs to assist in the direction of visitors 6 Xcel Energy— Site Plan, CUP Amendment, Variance, Easement Vacation attending training events. Staff will review these potential monument signs prior to the issuance of a sign permit. Drainage/Grading The applicant is proposing stormwater management through two infiltration basins, one located near the west property line and one located between the proposed building and substation. The stormwater ponds are proposed to be constructed in existing low-lying wetland areas, minimizing the need for additional grading. The proposed impervious surface is not shown to drain to the infiltration basins,and the applicant will need to provide treatment plans prior to future permitting. However, the applicant's stormwater management plan generally meets the City's water quality and rate control standards. Staff will continue to work with the applicant on addressing the technical comments related to their stormwater management plan prior to the issuance of a stormwater permit. Utilities The applicant plans to connect to city sewer and water stubs which are available for the northerly portion of the property. Wetlands The applicant is proposing to impact 0.39 acres of wetland, mitigated by the purchase of wetland credits. A wetland replacement plan application was received by the City on September 27, 2022, and is under review by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP). Indications from the TEP state that the proposal would meet the requirements for impact. Park Dedication Park dedication is not required for the proposed use. It is in staff s opinion that the applicant has met all the necessary requirements to approve their site plan. 5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT The applicant is proposing to expand outdoor storage with construction of new training transmission lines and a training substation. Since the area is expanding beyond the portion of the property covered by the original conditional use permit and subsequent amendments, a conditional use permit amendment is required. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to allow exterior storage larger than the principal building, provided that it is adequately screened from view of adjacent properties. The applicant is proposing to screen the outdoor facilities by way of existing mature wooded area, fencing, and the proposed approximately 35,000 square foot building on site. Staff is comfortable with the proposed location of the transmission lines and substation, and is of the opinion that they will be adequately screened. 7 Xcel Energy— Site Plan, CUP Amendment, Variance, Easement Vacation The 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies this property for Business Park (BP) use. The character of the surrounding area is industrial in nature. There are buffers of mature woodland and proposed landscaping that create separation between the site and nearby residential properties. It is in staff s opinion that the proposed use will not alter the character of the surrounding area. Staff is of the opinion that the request meets all of the requirements to approve a conditional use permit amendment. 6. EASEMENT VACATION The city maintains a drainage and utility easement for the delineated 0.39 acres of wetlands on site. The applicant is proposing to impact the wetlands for the construction of the new building, training facilities, and stormwater management infrastructure. Pending the approval of wetland replacement plan by the TEP,the wetlands will be filled and the City's need for a drainage and utility easement will be eliminated. Staff is of the opinion that the applicant meets the requirements to approve an easement vacation, subject to approval by the TEP. 7. CONCLUSION Staff finds that the proposal meets all the requirements necessary for the City to approve the site plan, CUP amendment, variance, and easement vacation as outlined in the City Code and zoning district regulations, subject to the conditions listed in the attached resolutions. 8. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the site plan, CUP amendment, variance, and easement vacation subject for Xcel Energy on the property located at 13620 Fenway Boulevard North. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Site Plan Resolution 3. CUP Resolution 4. Amended CUP 5. Variance Resolution 6. Easement Vacation Notice 7. Engineer's Memo dated November 3, 2022 8. Applicants Narrative 9. Civil Plan Set dated August 5, 2022 10. Updated Site Plan dated November 7, 2022 11. Exterior Elevations 8 Xcel Energy—Site Plan, CUP Amendment, Variance, Easement Vacation 12. Architectural Renderings 13. Substation Renderings 9 0 3 y m 0 Yy 7. N J 5 r i C� Parcel Boundary selection Site Roads y� Hugo Border Parcel Boundary //d \ ' t Xcel Energy Training Center N T�CHITTY OF 13620 Fenway Blvd. N 0 100A EST.ieos Location Map 010=Feet Hugo, MN 1 in=250 feet RESOLUTION 2022-XX APPROVING A SITE PLAN FOR XCEL ENERGY FOR A BUILDING AND OUTDOOR TRAINING FACILITIES ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13620 FENWAY BOULEVARD NORTH WHEREAS, Xcel Energy has requested approval of a site plan to allow construction of an approximately 35,000 square foot building and outdoor training facilities on the property located at 13620 Fenway Boulevard North and legally described as follows: See Attachment. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the site plan at a duly called a Public Hearing on November 10, 2022, and recommends approval; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Xcel Energy for a site plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. A site plan is approved for an approximately 35,000 square foot building and outdoor training facilities in accordance with the application received by the City on August 5, 2022 and November 7, 2022, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The site plan is subject to approval of a conditional use permit (Resolution #2022-XX) and variance (Resolutions #2022-XX) 3. A sign permit is required for all signs. The sign permit application shall be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to installation. 1. The applicant will be responsible for maintaining stormwater facilities and vegetation proposed as a part of the project. A maintenance agreement between the City and the applicant shall be reviewed and approved by the City then recorded against the property prior to the start of grading activities on the site. Drainage and utility easements shall be dedicated to the City over the stormwater management facilities. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits, the developer must comply with the following conditions: a. The applicant shall comply with all conditions from the City Engineer's memo dated November 3, 2022 b. The developer shall obtain all necessary local, state, and federal permits. c. The developer shall pay all fees as required in the fee schedule, subject to change each year. d. The applicant shall provide a plan for screening roof top or ground mounted mechanical equipment. Roof top mechanical equipment shall be screen with building materials consistent with the building. Resolution 2022- Page 2 of 3 Architecture a. The applicant shall submit building material and glass samples for review and approval by city staff. b. The percentage of metal covering the exterior of the building shall be 20 % or less. The architectural plans shall be reviewed and approved by staff. c. The internal roof drainage system that shall be integrated into the building design and shall be reviewed and approved by staff. d. The trash enclosure shall be included in the plans and shall be screened with materials consistent with the building material and shall be reviewed and approved by staff. Landscaping/lighting a. The developer shall show all areas that will be seeded, sodded, and irrigated on the landscape plan. b. The landscaping shall be irrigated to ensure establishment of plantings. c. The developer shall provide overstory deciduous trees and shrubs to substitute the minimum requirement of ornamental trees by City ordinance, in the respective amounts specified by the landscape plan dated August 5, 2022. d. The developer shall install temporary landscaping for the training area until the proposed building is constructed. Staff shall review and approve a temporary landscape plan. e. The lighting plan shall meet the standards in City Code Section 90-239 Lighting. f. The applicant shall submit cut sheets for the pole and wall mounted light fixtures to be reviewed and approved by staff. 5. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, the developer must comply with the following conditions: a. All exterior mechanical equipment must be screened from view of adjacent properties. Staff shall perform an inspection when equipment is installed to ensure compliance with City code. b. Any areas of the street, sidewalk, and trail connection that are disturbed with the construction shall be restored to the City's satisfaction. c. All landscaping shall be installed per the plans approved by staff. Resolution 2022- Page 3 of 3 ADOPTED by the City Council this 21 st day of November, 2022. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk RESOLUTION 2022-XX APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AMENDMENT FOR XCEL ENERGY TO AMEND THE SITE PLAN FOR THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13620 FENWAY BOULEVARD NORTH WHEREAS, Xcel Energy has requested approval of a conditional use permit amendment to amend the site plan for the property located at 13620 Fenway Boulevard North and is legally described as follows: (See Attached) WHEREAS, the site plan is in accordance with the variance to allow transmission training poles to be up to 105 feet in height, where 50 feet is required by ordinance. WHEREAS, a conditional use permit was approved on April 5, 2021, for a new transmission line for training. WHEREAS, it is the desire of the applicant to amend the conditional use permit approved on April 5, 2021, to revise the permit and to supersede all other prior conditional use permit approvals. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said conditional use permit amendment at a duly called public hearing on November 10, 2022, and recommends approval subject to the conditions listed in the conditional use permit. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the conditional use permit amendment for Xcel Energy on the property located at 13620 Fenway Boulevard North with the following findings: 1. The development shall comply with the revised site plan dated November 7, 2022. 2. The developer shall provide overstory deciduous trees and shrubs to substitute the minimum requirement of ornamental trees by City ordinance, in the respective amounts specified by the landscape plan dated August 5, 2022. 3. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, exact locations of new facilities and final project plans shall be reviewed and approved by staff. 4. The developer shall comply with all items in the conditional use permit and it will be recorded at Washington County. ADOPTED by the City Council this 21 st day of November, 2022. Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk CITY OF HUGO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT DATE OF APPROVAL: November 21, 2022 OWNER: Xcel Energy Inc. 414 Nicollet Mall Minneapolis, MN 55401 ADDRESS FOR WHICH CUP IS GRANTED: 13620 Fenway Boulevard North LEGAL DESCRIPTION: See Exhibit A ZONING DISTRICT: Business Park(BP) THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT ALLOWS FOR THE FOLLOWING: An exterior storage area and outdoor electric and gas training area. THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT IS APPROVED SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE WITH THE FOLLOWING SPECIAL CONDITIONS: 1. The conditional use permit is hereby amended to include the site plan dated November 7, 2022 showing the location of the added transmission lines and substation for training. 2. The conditional use permit shall comply with the following conditions: a. The development shall comply with the comments in the Engineer's memo dated December 1, 2011, May 15, 2012, October 29, 2012, and July 7, 2017, and November 3, 2022 b. The location and geometries of the site plan shall be further reviewed and approved by City staff prior to the issuance of a building permit. c. All exterior storage shall be screened from view from adjacent properties and right of ways. Staff shall review and approve the fencing and landscape plan. d. Exterior storage of equipment shall be located on a paved surface. e. The design of the home simulators shall be reviewed and approved by City staff prior to installation. f. At any time the fumes from the outdoor gas training becomes a nuisance; Xcel shall take action to abate the issue. At anytime as requested by the City, Xcel agrees to notify the surrounding property owners of gas training. Tom Weidt, Mayor STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this day of , 2022, before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared Tom Weidt, Mayor of the City of Hugo, a Minnesota municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Hugo by the authority of the City Council of the City of Hugo, and Tom Weidt, mayor, acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City of Hugo. Notary Public Dated: , 2022. Title STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this day of , 2022,before me, a Notary Public within and for said County, personally appeared , to me known as the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, who stated that they are the owners of the property this permit applies to, and acknowledged that they executed the same as their free act and deed. Notary Public This document was drafted by: Hugo City Council 14669 Fitzgerald Ave N Hugo, MN 55038 This Conditional Use Permit supersedes any Permits for this use that were previously recorded. RESOLUTION 2022-XX APPROVING A VARIANCE FOR XCEL ENERGY, FOR TRAINING TRANSMISSION LINES ON THE PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13620 FENWAY BOULEVARD NORTH WHEREAS, Xcel Energy, has requested approval of a variance to allow the height of training transmission lines to be up to 105 feet, where 50 feet is required by ordinance on the property legally described as; See Attached WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed said variance at a duly called a public hearing on November 10, 2022, and recommends approval subject to the findings listed in this resolution. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the variance for Xcel Energy, to allow training transmission lines to be up to 105 feet, where 50 feet is required by ordinance with the following findings: 1. The proposed variance is permissible by law. 2. The applicant is requesting to construct several non-energized transmission lines for training purposes that vary in height and reach up to 105 feet. 3. The applicant is requesting to use the property in a reasonable manner by constructing transmission lines of similar height to existing energized utility poles throughout the City. 4. The property is uniquely shaped and surrounded by mature wooded areas to the west and south, screening the facilities from adjacent land uses. The wooded areas and location of the proposed building would provide screening to the transmission lines. The need for a variance is due to unique circumstances. 5. The site surrounded by other business park uses and industrial uses. Additionally, the property is screened and buffered from nearby residential developments by existing wooded areas and the proposed training building, therefore the requested variance would not significantly alter the character of the surrounding area. 6. There are practical difficulties in meeting the zoning requirement. 7. The spirit and intent of the ordinance is to allow a certain building height without adversely impacting the character of established areas and ensuring the building is consistent with the surrounding development. The height of the transmission lines Resolution 2022-74 Page 2 will not adversely impact the character of the area and will be consistent with the surrounding development. The granting of the variance will keep with the spirit and intent of the ordinance. 8. Outdoor training facilities are allowed in the Business Park(BP) district with approval of a conditional use permit. The applicant has applied for a conditional use permit. 9. The project does not proposed to impact the floodplain. 10. The property is served with municipal sewer and water. ADOPTED by the City Council this 21 st day of November, 2022 Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: Michele Lindau, City Clerk NOTICE OF COMPLETION OF VACATION PROCEEDINGS FOR THE VACATION OF A PORTION OF A DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT ON PROPERTY LOCATED AT 13620 FENWAY BOULEVARD NORTH PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that the City Council for the City of Hugo has, on the 21 st day of November, 2022, completed the proceedings for the vacation of a portion of the Drainage and Utility Easement on the property legally described as follows: See Attached Dated this 21 st day of November, 2022. Bryan Bear, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF WASHINGTON) On this day of , 2022,before me, a Notary Public, personally appeared BRYAN BEAR, City Administrator of the City of Hugo, a Minnesota municipality within the State of Minnesota, and that said instrument was signed on behalf of the City of Hugo by the authority of the City Council of the City of Hugo, and BRYAN BEAR, City Administrator, acknowledge said instrument to be the free act and deed of said City of Hugo. Notary Public This Instrument was drafted by: City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Ave N Hugo, MN 55038 wsb November 3, 2022 Ms. Rachel Juba Community Development Director City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Site Plan Review Xcel Hugo Training Facility WSB Project No. 021146-000 Dear Ms. Juba: ° We have reviewed the site plan submittal for the Xcel Hugo Training Facility site located west of c� Fenway Boulevard at the equivalent of 137th Street. In particular, we have reviewed the following w plans related to this particular request: m rn • Civil Plan Set(Xcel Hugo Training Facility Preliminary Plan -Revision 08-09-22.pdo dated 8/9/22 by Loucks co • Stormwater Management Plan (22 08-09- SWMP.pdo dated 8/9/22 by Loucks N Based on the review of the above documents, we offer the following comments related to this Lo application: 0 Grading, Street, and Utility Plans 1. The site is proposed to have two accesses. The first is through one of their existing parking entrances on Fenway Boulevard while the second is an additional connection to Fenway Boulevard approximately 750 feet to the north. 2. Water service to the site will be achieved with connecting to an existing 8" water stub from aFenway Boulevard near the southeast corner of the site. New hydrants are proposed for the site however, the need for additional hydrants will be determined by the fire official. a 3. Sanitary sewer service is available to the site from the existing 8" sanitary sewer service stub rn at the southeast corner of the lot that was constructed with the initial training facility site. 4. 329 additional parking spaces are provided around the northern, eastern, and southern sides of the building. w 5. Detailed redline comments have been provided on the plans and sent to the applicants Z) engineer so they can be addressed in future submittals. U) W Stormwater Management W U) 6. Applicant is proposing to meet water quality requirements through onsite depressed areas providing infiltration however the majority of the impervious area onsite does not drain through these low-lying areas. Treatment needs to be provided and documented for co permitting compliance where impervious is shown to drain to. C:\Users\max.gort\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\AIOVOAHC\021146-000 LTR RJuba-Xcel Hugo Training Facility-Site Plan 110322(002).docx Ms. Rachel Juba November 3, 2022 Page 2 7. Per RCWD Rule C.6.d.2 if infiltration is feasible onsite, onsite volume control through either infiltration or water reuse must be used to provide the required water quality volume. If it not feasible for infiltration to provide all of the required water quality volume and alternative BMPs are proposed to provide water quality volume, it must be documented why that is the case. It should be noted that the site appears to be located within a high vulnerability DWSMA which requires a higher level of engineering review for infiltration to confirm infiltration will not cause negative impacts on groundwater. 8. Rate control and freeboard requirements are shown to be met with the current design but should be confirmed once comments on water quality have been addressed. 9. Drainage and utility easement should be shown over the proposed stormwater management basins and access pathways to the basins. 10. A maintenance agreement will be required for the stormwater management facilities. 11. Water reuse on this site is not intended, nor practical given the site characteristics. 12. Stormwater plan and model comments have been provided to applicant and will need to be addressed in future submittals for documentation and permitting purposes. Wetland 13. 0.39 acres of wetland impacts are proposed with the project. A replacement plan application was submitted on September 27, 2022. Comments were received by the TEP and the applicant is currently working to address those comments. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. Additional comments may be necessary following the review of the responses to these. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463. Sincerely, WSB Mark Erichson, PE City Engineer cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director(email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative In 2012, the Xcel Energy Hugo Training Center building was designed, permitted, and constructed. The original plans for the site included several future training facility expansions and space to locate a future service center on the north half of the property. A 2017 project added a Gas Village training area west of the HTC building. In 2021, Xcel Energy sought to add outdoor non-energized transmission training lines along the western boundary of the property to address a need for improved linesman training facilities. A project was presented to and approved by the City of Hugo, but it was not constructed.After a thorough review of its training needs,company officials responsible for multiple areas of staff training wished to execute a more complete vision for the site. Staff were directed to create a full site plan. With this filing, Xcel Energy is proposing to construct multiple training operations at the HTC. The company's vision would have the site become the host for most of the company's staff training of gas, electrical and nuclear operators in their northern territories. The proposed site facilities and co-location of training staff will create operating efficiencies and provide new opportunities for training collaboration with other utilities' staff and first responders from throughout the region. Site History - 2012 Original Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit o Training Center was approved by City of Hugo in early 2012 which included three phases of a site plan for an approximate 50,000 square foot building and outdoor training facilities: ■ Main building—classroom, labs, offices, conference room, etc. ■ Indoor"electric barn" ■ Indoor transmission training ■ Outdoor training field: electric distribution pole array o Outdoor training field: gas Future Service Center:to be constructed on north parcel - 2017 Revised Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit Amendment o Gas Village Training Facility: constructed on west side of property o Site plan included identifying a future building expansion of approximately 12,000 square feet for substation training. - 2021 Revised Site Plan, and Conditional Use Permit Amendment and Height Variance Exemption o Approved by City of Hugo in Spring 2021, with 72-ft maximum structure height. o Transmission Line Training Facility—outdoor and non-energized o Project was put on hold by Xcel Energy in Summer/Fall 2021, in favor of a combined Substation and Transmission Line Training Facility—outdoor and non-energized. Site Plans- Present and Future Since this site was first planned, designed and constructed 10 years ago, the Xcel Energy training department and its needs have evolved. Safety is a core value at Xcel Energy, and the development of high-quality training facilities for our employees has been prioritized. Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative By centralizing our training operations and dedicating the entire HTC property to support training activities, our company can expand and improve an already industry-leading training facility. When completed,the site will provide capabilities to train not only Xcel Energy employees and contractors of varying utilities disciplines, but also staff from other utilities and municipality emergency services. HTC will host coordinated multi-organization emergency response exercises and other training that is necessary. It is important to note that while the company's needs for a high-quality, centralized training facility are at the forefront, our long-term plans still include the possibility of locating a new service center in the northeast metro in the years ahead. We will continue to search for suitable sites for this purpose. Proposed Project 1 of 2:Transmission Lines and Substation Outdoor Training Facility In early-April 2021, the City of Hugo approved a Conditional Use Permit, a site plan amendment and a height variance for a non-energized outdoor transmission line only training facility.While this project was being reviewed by the City,Xcel Energy's training department was going through a reorganization process to better align company training procedures and strategies.The project team determined the best option was to pause the approved transmission line only project to provide time for reassessing the master plan for the site. This pause, along with the evolution of the training department, allowed for a complete redesign of the approved transmission line project.The redesign increases the number of lines, relocates them to a more suitable location on the property, and includes a non-energized outdoor substation. This new design will greatly increase the training effectiveness of these facilities as it fully replicates real- world conditions with transmission lines, a substation, and the interactions between the two facilities. The design will consist of 4 different lines at 3 different voltages(1 @ 69kV,2 @ 115kV, 1 @ 345kV)totally approximately 25 different pole type transmission line structures with a height range of approximately 43' to 105'. The substation will be an approximately 1.65-acre class-5 gravel pad, enclosed by a 10' chain link galvanized steel perimeter fence. This facility is designed to simulate a 345kv, 115kv, 69kv, 35kv and 15kv substations. From a training perspective, this is far superior to the previously submitted project design. Benefits for constructing the new facilities on the north half of the HTC site: • Offers a centralized training center with convenient access to the adjacent indoor training center building that offers classrooms, restrooms, and protection during inclement weather. • Connecting the Substation and Transmission Line outdoor yards together would create a "real life scenario"training yard that could provide more teaching opportunities about safety. If a smaller site was selected, the substation and transmission lines may need to be constructed separately (i.e. not connected) and perhaps on different sites. Any alternative site would likely not have the convenience of adjacent classrooms, restrooms, and storm shelters that the HTC site currently offers. • Wide open areas without obstacles allow for increased safety while maneuvering larger equipment around transmission line structures for training exercises. • Adequate space to host larger groups of both Xcel Energy and foreign utility (non-Xcel Energy) crews for training purposes. This larger yard could host a "lineman rodeo",which is a competitive Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative training event where approximately 4-groups of 15-20 people per group (up to 100-150 people total)would simultaneously cycle through different stations to train on various real-life scenarios. • Avoid physical interference with building near the existing "school of dirt" and the "gas extinguishing pit"training areas, both located in the southwest corner of the Hugo training center site,where the previous transmission line only project was originally proposed in 2021. • Potential to host training exercises for contractors, other utility companies, and various governmental emergency services. • Expected Employee Use: • Approximately 90employees in Transmission Line Operations, including Supervisors. • Approximately 100 employees in Substation Construction. • 4-weeks for Journeyman training, 2-4 weeks for other miscellaneous training,training groups consisting of 20-30 employees. • Employees operating throughout our business footprint would spend multiple days training at the facility, with many requiring meals and lodging. Estimated Schedule (Project 1 of 2): • Design and Permitting: Summer-Fall 2022 • Grading: Spring 2023 • Transmission Line Construction:Summer-Fall 2023(TBD crew availability and material lead times) • Substation Construction: Summer-Fall 2023 (TBD crew availability and material lead times) • Completed by end 2023 Proposed Project 2 of 2: Centralized In-Processing(CIP) Building Project We propose to construct a separate two-story building of approximately 30,000-40,000 square feet. The new building will allow us to centralize nuclear staff training operations that presently occur at Monticello and Prairie Island facilities; relocate training activities that presently occur at our Minneapolis Riverside Training Center(RTC); and host other training and events that our business operations may occasionally require. As part of their normal schedule of operations, our nuclear plants are taken off-line for refueling, training and maintenance periods.The CIP building will serve a critical role in supporting these planned plant outages. Currently, In-processing for employees and contractors that support nuclear maintenance outages is provided at the individual sites, but the configuration of facilities at the sites aren't efficient. Outages typically require an additional 800 staff and contractors from throughout our business and from around the country to surge onto the site for a work period.These workers must be processed and trained before they can begin their work. In-processing is required for all types of contractor trades: electricians, pipefitters, steelworkers, plumbers, HVAC, etc.). Presently,for each outage,temporary offices, classroom trailers and other equipment is moved on-site to facilitate maintenance activities. Also, during outage operations,training for site personnel must be suspended to free up classroom space.The project provides us with opportunities to improve efficiencies and significantly lower operating costs. Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative In addition to improving In-Processing operations, our training personnel see the opportunity to relocate training operations now hosted at the Riverside Training Center(RTC),which is over 90 years old.This will allow us to centralize Xcel Energy Technical Training staff in Hugo, creating operating efficiencies and improving the sharing of resources across our training programs.The project includes construction of virtual training classrooms,to lower training costs as well as provide needed space to train the workforce of the future in Renewable Energy technologies. • Expected employee use: • Up to 225 employees during peak times (contractors and staff) over 6-weeks in Spring and Fall. • 65-150 per day during off peak times. Estimated Schedule (Project 2 of 2): • Design & Permitting: Summer-Fall 2023 Construction: 20 24-2026 Requested City Actions: Site Plan Approval The applicant is requesting site plan approval for the above mentioned project. Plans have been included in support of the application and its consistency with the existing Business Park Zoning District can be summarized as follows: Building Setbacks: Proposed Front Setback=111 feet from Fenway Boulevard. Proposed Rear Setback=752 feet from westerly property line. Proposed Side Setback=231 feet from northerly property line. The proposal exceeds the required 30-foot front and rear setback and side yard setback equal to the height of the building, in no case less than 10 feet. Additional setback has been provided by the Owner to allow for greater screening to support the variance request. Building Coverage and Lot Coverage: Proposed Building Area=5.7%. Proposed Impervious Area=41.9% The proposal meets the maximum lot are a cover by a building of 40%and lot area to be covered by impervious surface of 80%. Landscape: The required landscape requirements for this project were calculated using either the perimeter of the site or the building square footage. Quantities have been included for whichever calculation is greater. Based on these calculation the following landscaping is required: Required overstory deciduous trees=47 Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative Required coniferous trees=36 Required ornamental trees= 36 Required shrubs=235 Xcel is proposing the following landscaping as part of this project: Provided overstory deciduous trees=185 Provided coniferous trees=36 Provided ornamental trees = 15 Provided shrubs=441 The proposed landscape meets or exceeds the requirements of Section 90-181 for required landscaping except for the ornamental tree count. More overstory deciduous trees are proposed than required to provide better screening.The groundcover is proposed to be a mix of native grasses around the stormwater facilities, low mow turf grass around the training areas, and sod and stone mulches around the building and parking lots.The native grasses and low mow turf is designed to reduce weekly maintenance, provide pollinator habitats, reduce irrigation requirements, and reduce the need for fertilizer and pesticides. Lighting: A lighting plan hasn't been developed yet for this project.The proposed lighting will comply with the requirements of cut-off fixtures and for light cast on adjacent property and roads not exceed %foot candle measured at the property line or 1 foot candle measured at the street's centerline. Previous applications from Xcel have proposed LED lights for pole and wall mounted fixtures. Lighting plans and photometric providing more detail for the pole locations and fixture types will be provided to the City for review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Lighting in the substation training area is also proposed.These lights would be mounted to the substation equipment and only be used when needed for training events. Fencing and Screening: The transmission lines and substation outdoor training facilities contain power poles with associated power lines and typical components found in a substation.The majority of this area will be screened by the existing vegetation located on the west and south side of the parcel.The In-Processing Building is strategically located to provide screening for the majority of the Training Area. In addition, Xcel is proposing to install trees between the parking lot and Fenway Blvd, as well as in areas around the building and in parking lot islands to provide screening from neighboring properties. Fencing is being proposed around the substation infrastructure and south of the proposed building to prevent unauthorized access to the training yard infrastructure. Fencing around the substation is proposed to be 10'tall.There will be a controlled gate where the gravel access drives enter the training area. The fencing and gate materials will be a combination of black architectural wrought iron and black chain link to match the existing fencing on the site. Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative Mechanical Equipment Screening: Mechanical equipment for the proposed building will either be located on the ground or internal of the building.As the mechanical equipment layout progresses, a screening design will be designed to meet Section 90-272 Code Requirements. Plans will be updated to show more detail for the mechanical equipment and associated screening for City review and approval prior to issuance of building permits. Street and Access: The property currently has two access points from Fenway Boulevard.The project proposing one addition access point just north of the In-Processing Building and widening of the existing curb cut near the existing building.The north access is being proposed to be 24 feet wide and the existing access is being proposed to be 33 feet wide. Spacing for all proposed and modify access points exceed 150 feet. These access points meet the requirements of Section 90-222. Parking: Parking Required=186 Stalls. Proposed Parking Provided=329 Stalls. The proposal exceeds the required parking outlined in Section 90-253. Xcel is proposing to exceed the requirement number of parking stalls to meet the demand of anticipated Staff training events. Trails: There is a City trail along Fenway Boulevard North. Xcel is not proposing additional trails with this development. Building Architecture: Floor plans, elevations, and building renderings have been provided. Drainage/Grading: Treatment for stormwater runoff is being provided for both of the Transmission Line/Substation and In- Processing Building projects as part of this application.Supporting plans and hydrology calculations have been provided to confirm these basins meet the City of Hugo Stormwater Requirements and Policies. The property currently has two access points from Fenway Boulevard. Currently the site drains to the existing wetland or to the parcel just west of the Xcel property. Proposed drainage patterns will be similar to the existing drainage patterns and include two separate infiltrations basin which will ultimately overtop to the property to the west. Utilities: The proposed building will be served by existing sanitary and watermain service stubs adjacent to the property. Wetlands: Wetlands existing on the westerly side of the parcel and interior of the site near the proposed building. Xcel proposes to fill and mitigate the wetland in the interior of the site to allow for the required Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative improvements to the parcel.The proposed wetland to be filled is approximately 0.39 Acres in size and will be mitigated per City requirements using purchased Wetland Credits.A completed City Wetland Services Form has been included in this submittal. Conditional Use Permit(CUP)Amendment Xcel is requesting an amendment to the existing Conditional Use Permit to expand an outdoor electric training area.The proposed project meets the findings required for approval as follows: The proposed use is permissible by law. Exterior storage is an allowed conditional use as long as it is adequately screened. Based on the placement of the training area, location of the proposed In-Processing Building, existing vegetation, and proposed landscaping we believe the proposed plan is permissible. The proposed use is in keeping with the spirit and intent. The intent of the ordinance is to allow for exterior storage larger than the principal structure as long as it is adequately screened. Based on the placement of the training area, location of the proposed In- Processing Building, existing vegetation, and proposed landscaping we believe the proposed plan is in keeping with the intent of the code. The proposed use is compatible with the city's comprehensive plan,and the character of the surrounding area. The comprehensive plan identifies this parcel as Business Park(BP).The character and the zoning of this area is largely industrial with additional BP Zoned Parcels.There are residential properties to the north and south of the proposed project but there are significant buffers of woodland, existing commercial buildings, and proposed landscaping to screen the Training Area from the residential properties.We believe the proposed project is compatible with existing uses of this parcel and with the character of the area. The proposed use has adequate drainage,water supply,electrical,gas, and sewage treatment facilities. The site has proposed utilities stubbed into the area to adequate serve the proposed building. Drainage and stormwater management are being provided to allow for positive drainage away from the proposed building and training areas to meet City requirements. The proposed use has adequate road access,and does not reduce the safety or capacity of the public road system. The proposed project is providing access point's accordance to City requirements to Fenway that will allow for safe pedestrian and vehicular movements into and out of the Xcel site. The technical evaluation of the floodplain, if required,accurately represents the conditions and boundaries of the floodplain area,as well as correctly represents the proposed use's impact on the floodplain. The project doesn't propose to impact any existing floodplain areas. Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative The proposed use may not create a danger that materials may be swept onto other lands, or downstream to the injury of others, or block bridges,culverts, or other hydraulics. Temporary erosion control measures will be installed as part of construction in accordance to the approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). In addition to the temporary erosion control measure permanent stormwater management practices are being installed to quality and quantity to the runoff leaving the site. The proposed use will not damage or reduce the benefits the public receives from the public waters. Temporary erosion control measures will be installed as part of construction in accordance to the approved Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). In addition to the temporary erosion control measure permanent stormwater management practices are being installed to quality and quantity to the runoff leaving the site. If located in the shoreland overlay district,all structures and facilities are screened from view from public waters. The project is not located in an existing shoreland overlay district. If the permit is to approve a wetlands replacement plan,the plan is in conformance with the rules of the state board of the soil and water resources for such plans. Xcel is proposing filling an existing wetland onsite as part of this project.The project has been delineated and the delineation has been approved by the LGU and the TEP Panel.An application proposing this wetland fill and replacement using wetland credits has been submitted as part of this review. We believe this process is in conformance with the rules of the state. The applicant or operator shall obtain all necessary state and local permits for the conditional use. We believe with the site plan review, conditional use amendment,variance request, easement vacation, and wetland modification applications we meet these requirements. The proposed use is adequately buffered and screened from noncompatible land uses and public rights-of-way. We believe with the placement of the training area, location of the proposed In-Processing Building, existing vegetation, and proposed landscaping we believe the proposed plan is adequately buffered. Variance Request Xcel is requesting a variance to allow for a structures contain as part of the proposed training facility to exceed the 50-foot maximum allowed in the BP Zoning District.The proposed project meets the findings required for approval as follows: The variance as requested is permissible by law. The training center is a permissible use in the Business Park Zoning District.Additionally,the proposed Transmission lines are similar in nature to existing operable utility poles located around the City of Hugo. The proposed height of the towers are what the Xcel Team feels is required for their Staff to gain the training they need for real world situations. We believe the proposed plan minimizes adverse visual effects therefore is permissible by law. Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative Practical Difficulties A.The property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the ordinance. The additional Transmission Line facilities will not alter the use of the site as it will remain a utility training facility.The proposed Transmission lines are similar in nature to existing operable utility poles located around the City of Hugo.The proposed height of the towers are what the Xcel Team feels is required for their Staff to gain the training they need for real world situations. Based on the placement of the proposed transmission lines, substation, proposed In-Processing Building, existing vegetation, and proposed landscaping we believe the proposed use/variance is a reasonable use of the property. B.The plight of the property owner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. The existing property is surrounded by mature wooded vegetation to the west and south which provides significant screening for the proposed training facilities from adjacent land uses including residential to the south. In addition to the existing vegetation, placement of the proposed In-Processing Building and proposed landscaping will provided significant screening from properties to the north and Fenway Boulevard to the east.Additionally,the proposed Transmission lines are similar in nature to existing operable utility poles located around the City of Hugo. C.The variance if granted will not alter the essential character of the neighborhood. The comprehensive plan identifies this parcel as Business Park(BP).The character and the zoning of this area is largely industrial with additional BP Zoned Parcels.There are residential properties to the north and south of the proposed project but there are significant buffers of woodland, existing commercial buildings, and proposed landscaping to screen the Training Area from the residential properties.We believe the proposed project including the requested variance is compatible with existing uses of this parcel and will not drastically change the site. The granting of the variance would be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this chapter and with the policies of the city's comprehensive plan. The intent of the ordinance is to allow for the training area as long as it is adequately screened. Based on the placement of the transmission lines, substation, location of the proposed In-Processing Building, existing vegetation, and proposed landscaping we believe the proposed variance is in keeping with the existing training facility and the intent of the code. The variance,if granted,shall not have the effect of allowing any use prohibited in the district. The training center is a permissible use in the Business Park Zoning District.Additionally,the proposed Transmission lines are similar in nature to existing operable utility poles located around the City of Hugo. The proposed height of the towers are what the Xcel Team feels is required for their Staff to gain the training they need for real world situations. The variance,if granted,shall not permit a lower degree of flood protection than required by this chapter.The variance shall be determined the minimum necessary,considering the flood hazard,to Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative afford relief, and the variance shall not be issued with any designated regulatory floodway if any increase in flood levels during the base flood discharge would result. The parcel in question is not located in any FFMA designated floodplain and the proposed site improvements doesn't propose to impact any existing floodplain or floodway areas. Stormwater management is being provided for the proposed project in accordance to the City of Hugo requirements and will therefore reduce the volume and rate of stormwater leaving the site while providing treatment to the stormwater leaving the site. The sewage treatment and water system of the subject property is in compliance with city and state codes. The parcel doesn't have any septic and/or wells.The existing buildings onsite and the proposed improvements will be served by City Sewer and Water. Hugo Training Center (HTC) Site Narrative Proposed Project 2 of 2: New Building Project We propose to construct a separate two-story building of approximately 30,000-40,000 square feet. The new building will allow Xcel Energy to relocate training activities that presently occur at our Minneapolis Riverside Training Center(RTC);establish advanced training laboratories and classrooms dedicated to Gas, Industrial Unmanned Inspection, centralized Safety, OSHA, Environmental and public training offerings. The new building will allow us to centralize a significant portion of Xcel Energy's Technical Training operations as well as create operating efficiencies and improve the sharing of resources across our training programs, and the Hugo community.The project includes construction of virtual training classrooms and equips Xcel for operations in newly emerging technologies essential for carbon reduction, and the shift to green energy. If the site plan as shown with the specified parking facilities is permitted,Xcel will also utilize this facility for centralized Nuclear Contract Employee in processing prior to outage operations which occur across the state of Minnesota. Expected steady state employee use: • 3,000 employees with concentration in the Spring and Fall • 65-150 per day during off peak times. If Centralized Nuclear In-Processing remains viable: • 1,500 per year • 300 per day during peak times Estimated Schedule (Project 2 of 2): Design & Permitting: Summer-Fall 2023 Construction: 2024-2026 NOTE: I uq�q 1 X928.7 EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN ISXCEL O C��1118° 6 6� �11 \ g2gO BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY CORNERSTONE •6f X 17.9 Xq1 207 6 6 N �� 9. X qq,` Q�6 9� /@ LAND SURVEYING INC., DATED 06/14/2022. TRAINING r X91�� O 183 ory 6 8$ 29 + BITUMINOUS DRIVE ,S'89�33 '�8"E 895. 0> ,q� -_� V J BITUMINOUS DRIVE 9 a Xql 1 I I \ X o yFACILITY J 2 U 2A. g30 I 'f as J T 3Y X x k - J x Xq j-X - 9�2.2' 9/15 2 / 931 932 ^�+ 60.9 184 q22MN �28 7,8 �' X 4 8 q2 Sq 6 9.4 q.5 .3 30.1 q3 Sp 30,5 q Xg30.1 t1 1.6 q3Q 296. 7 O q31 X X q 288.5 1 _ X918.1 X X930.5 930.0 Xg2q.7 1L2'17 Xg2q.6 °� X930.6 X930.2 k9�9� Xg30.2 w� N g31.3 1 Xg30.5 930.0 O� g31.3 �l� O 38 -- gIB sx C�• 0.5X k -- -- - Xg30.q Xg30.8 93 .0____ wlii 8O "I'l 179 Xq 0.5 L TH:-- J 7.7 Xg30.0 q30 g30.1 Xc130.8 p Xq 3.7 \ Z- iil NCE 186 ORNER X931.6 Xg30.6 Xg31. Xg30.6 Xg30.1 q 32�X Xq 7.2 Xg31.4 Xg30.6 Xg30.5 Xg31.0 XqI Xg30.4 q31 9 a •178 24 ' �" 917. 7/ X 3.7 X931.7 Xg30.8 Xg30.q Xg30.q o 932.3-- n N12 30 _- +175 ' 187 Xg31.0 Xg30.2 CI IX 8 ` g32.4-- 4 2.9 , 189 188 X 28.8 0 Xg32.7 Xg32.g X X931.7 g31.0 Xg30.5 \ \ ll •174 •190 Qrh 932 X931.0 X930.6 X930.8 O3\ g32.6- 8 q� •191 r\ q75 g25.°��� O X 933.4 x g30.2 93� Xg31.2 wW g320 Xg32.5 932.0 414 01 192 g31.4X o A • • MALL,/ 1 Q , � � q32 I p� XG130.2 Xg33.2 X933.7 xg33.6 Xc130.9 Xg30 g2q.3X LO X g32.5 2 �� 1q I 1`195 q3� Xg30.5 X .0 Xc131.2 CC °\3 934 X 928.7 X g2q. g32.2 ■ _ ■■ DUCKS X g34.2 X c128. 9 N o ' >> _-� B +173 209 197 Xc12 .5 0J Xg31.4 w n N37 38 43 E 52. 23 _-- 1 + g31.9 x 21.6 •171 S8 ��-LAT : Xc1315 Xq3 Xg32.q Xg28.7 �82 �� g33.2--- 'I 1 G 7n 932. PLANNING \\ E E "L10 Xg34.5 o' Q.SX �� X927.7 , �X92q.4 Xc130.3 I li Y 1132.5 Xg33.0 \ 170 198 g26' 0 NI C\ Xg29.5 N CIVIL ENGINEERING +172 •169 •199 LA H:-- X� xg28.2 x 28.6 Xq3 8 a "lam ' ��� LAND SURVEYING X926.3 Xg27 XcI34.2 FE CE LO� I C RNER sB ® � � Xq2 xg3L5 9 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ENVIRONMENTAL WETLAND LINE XcI31.4 q27 WETLAND LINE g3 .1x A 7' 6 x 30.2 X 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 + • 201 X934.1 g2q♦4 X927.5 6. � f N 93 .3-� Maple Grove MN 55369 J202 �.� x q32. 8 P 932.0 X q34. + Xq q.q 6 � � 7" • Xql .1 g33.4 �- Xq 7.6 763.424.5505 928.q w !� , Xq 206 g27.2 Xg30.7 w 0 •164 12 •208 X934.3 g27.24 Xg272 Xg27.4 I 933.4 E „I �„ www.loucksinc.com Q , 165 209 ` g27.3 X 931.5 jf�63 7.0 Q31'Qco LEGEND: Cam• lY. a X g33.9 X g28.8 � q Xg33.5 g32.q g27.0 Xq2 .3 213 211 •210 Xq 1.8 Xq3 .3 g30.9 g28.3X Xq�• c Q z X g30.1 a FOUND MONUMENT MARKED RLS44900 FIRE DEPT.CONNECTION uE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC .^ g18.2 162 Xg22 ` ' Xq 8.8 g31.0 y"Y p ED (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) (� X q 6.6 O m O HYDRANT ury UNDERGROUND CABLE TV ^"J 1 +212 Xg33. Xg26.5 g32.7 SET 1/2"IRON PIPE 1, Xg31.7 Q MARKED RLS NO.25718 ® CURB STOP uF UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC �C X 28.1 n i-g28.8 0� UT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE ^ '14 9 c\, g31.7X "� lu � ou OVERHEAD UTILITY +160 2 215 "� ° TV CABLE TV PEDESTAL ua WATER VALVE 926.7-. o- SB � w 26.7 Xg28. Xg30.5 Xg32.6 Xg33.3 X 3 2 � � sg I Q AC AIR CONDITIONER ® BOLLARD ?/ g32.1 X 34.1 X1131.9 Xcl2q.8 0 ❑cit ELECTRIC METER C� FLAG POLE uc UNDERGROUND GAS n, ` 9 7 Ix O X g30.7 EP ELECTRIC PEDESTAL MB MAIL BOX > SANITARY SEWER �-Il X 159 6 Xg33.4 X 2q.1 q2 X q2g P X931.4 � ET ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER -� TRAFFIC SIGN >> STORM SEWER 9w � O LIGHT POLE O UNKNOWN MANHOLE I WATERMAIN 8 6. ITS X g31.6 7 _ D F- GUY WIRE SPOT ELEVATION AI GE AND UTLrrY ASEMENT PER 931.6X z -x x FENCE CADD� QUALIFICATION X 156 -�� PLA OF ROY MOAT SECOND A00111 N ` � POWER POLE ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL X<I31.6 CURB[TYPICAL] 33.0 Xc1312 Xg33. � X'.j4 GAS MANHOLE ® ROOF DRAIN 1230 CONTOURS 155 Xq2 6 Xg28. g32.q_S 0 O CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are Xc132.2 X930.8 ® GAS METER instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely X 932.5 q2 .5X g24.1 X 5.7 g34.0 X 931.3 g32.8 - with respect to this project.These CADD files shall not be used J [�T TELEPHONE MANHOLE CONIFEROUS TREE BITUMINOUS SURFACE on other projects,for additions to this project,or for completion ly Xg2q.6 Xg30.5 Xg31.5 m ® TELEPHONE PEDESTAL of this project by others without written approval by the 6 X c133.4 X g28.5 0 Xg31.4 �' Consultant.With the Consultant's approval,others may be Co SANITARY CLEANOUT DECIDUOUS TREE CONCRETE SURFACE permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for ® SANITARY MANHOLE information and reference only.All intentional or unintentional Xq .2 a r------------i +153 c, 931.7X revisions,additions,or deletions to these CADD files shall be X 0 or® CATCH BASIN i i GRAVEL SURFACE 9� X g326 Xg33.4 X g33.2 X930.1 ------------� made at the full risk of that party making such revisions,additions 2 aj O or ❑ STORM DRAIN or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the ' Xg31.1 Xg31. b 7 � Xg32.6 "- Z ® FLARED END SECTION RIP RAP SURFACE Consultant from any&all responsibilities,claims,and liabilities. 10.8 O X g33.q q 2.6X --L TH Xg24.8 / _-LAT N w Xg30,5 9,30 Xg31.4 Xg31.7 UJ N O STORM MANHOLE SUBMITTAUREVISI• NS LL ,r!151 // / Xg26.2 x 27.q 6 Xg33.6 Xg30.2 xg3L5 a t 150 / 6 � xg31.6 N 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL 22.8 xg257 Xg3L2 Xg32.5 931.8X X ti' h Xg32. Xq 3.1 Xg31.3 g31.6 M 48 � X 2q.8 Xg32.6 Xg31.6 ° N �. 5 X 920. CID Xg33.7 ° v /--g30.3 X9 2.9 Xg31.3 Xg31.7 X931.q Xf Xg21. N -g30.1 I �- g30.5 Xg3L2 Xg3L5 g3L5 Xg32.0 1.. +143 0 9� a Xo128.2 219 222 C;�,2�3 q3 Xg31.6--g2q.2 t*� Xg32.7 1� q31. Co •142 J / g31.6X , p 6 Xq 5.7 y o20?� 2 9 -g32.1 Xg32.6 �--g33.g X933.1 Xg31.7 Sn --933.4 / 933.2 -g33.1 Xg31.8 931.9- � g3L2 141 l - 30\ X929.4 22 228 233 /� j IIG�� 3 Xg32.7 \ �'1 Xg23.5 ° 229 2 tj X --g33.7 / n 136 1 N 6 + 9298 226 +9 M Il 234 q13 l 2u/-g32.7 i./_ter X931.8 X931A g31.q- if 6 6 X q. +X227 -q .7 -g33.0 '�/ �� \ � 3 1 /�i11�� X931.6 Xg31.q Xg31.5 I. 140 9 2�21. /4232 g31.1 Xg31.6 �p N X928.5 + 1 q32 Xg31.5 ! �I mo 0 g34.1-- 2n g32.3-� „ c v/ n o 6 �; 1- 31 a° (325.0 ---Yq2 .9 92g.8� i--g33.7 / 9�, � 1 2 y� �� • 8 P7 � 130 I a I g25.goL +217 9 GM 9X Xq .6 xg33� v235 X933.2 I_-9329 �irg32.3 3n -g32.3 `G \__g322 ���• w =g31880 - - �• • Xq2 .5 4q �925.5 X928. _ �9 + \ •230 C.231 % \`\\Xg33.5 g32.7X 2" 311 / 932 Xq3 q /--g32.0 q) 0 9 \ �( X921.4 q2 I 1 Xg .I d �� s Ax / \ / 932.3-� \`�_ Xg31.8 `Y/ 5� _ 129 p 21 q.3 O 9 q3 / I �_ �� I herebycertify that this Ian,tpeFiationorre rta 1X GAS _ � / \� -g33.0 32.0 I X� 3n fY p" I 933 / u -g32.2 Xc131.8 -q32 0 O.q prepared by me or under su�ervj6ta dthat + Xg32.q 3 - g32.4 Xg31.2 \ o `127 0. n� 3 GM + _ 0 X 3" /�� g31.3-� ^� I am a duly Licensed Pro E i nder the Q2 >-4 INA AND UTILITY ASEMENT P g25.1 i + 3 X933. A3 EDGE 2 -g3L5 311 "V/ATER G / PLAT aF OY M0NI09 COhD 9c-� ry L4 EP W / 93 �• FIELD -I 9 d' \f / Q q31. _ _ 1 9 ICO + �� / 03\�� _ 3L 1 g _ W q tv Xg31.8 a8\' / PM pLAll w o a laws of the State o�fnesota� 1 'S R� S / Ex.SMH - U 3 E \. __` 1 1 / RANAGE AND UTILITY EASEMEN R A. 93/ * GM ,`\ RIM=Q33.2 9`3 , __F- - RIM=932.7- �X 2n 311 n w \ �/g32.5 932.2 3 \ w LA OF R0Y MOLITOR ADDITION X q (6 AZ G°�L 'I' X � Q� Y ASEMENT P I n*AT- 6 I 9 ,C g31.2 � * �,o 1 I I Z�• 32 .0 9 Jri O 932 / \NV=927.5 / 7\ ` ADDYfION- NV=926.7GS A D UTILITY 3/ r7 A - - - - - . Xg31.8 < \- Licens I`�o�� 20383 ql$.Q 1 Q- 1 \ h OF R MOLrrO SECo D ADDN k T cLouth-PE � o� O � 31.q � �.1.[, �- 1 ' a - EDGE_ � - ��� \ rv10 Xq2 5 �' x v �<-BUG - 932.4- X93' - _ _ _ - _X _ _ _ _J Ex.c6 a z^ �^ // Xg23.q 92 g .8 A2 M=93l.I %'I \ UG UG G ,�=-� 11 / M=Q3 .5 g30.6I a Date \j Xg20. LA X 22.5 4 g N ro o x x- 9 Xg31.4 Xg31.1 Xq3 91 �/ / 0',16' E 9�, 9`�� ry. 93 .7 v� 3 31 _ g31.62.0 Xq I q31 mM q\q.0 Xq2 922 928. 0 0 931.8 g32.q. a �� 23 \ . + 4 3 �- SP3" gC 31.1 uP • CONTROL / � s `� _ .? � N� 932.2 92 22.1 3 Q ° eP�nj .. 9"'� /� �k� q ° ^� o h `� 311 �� SP <g q to �� xqlg31.8 / ? o; 2'q X932. �-�' q 6 ^Ex.FES + RM=929. •nl, P •' * �9 a-ex.CB / / p " .1^UG / - - 3�� 0� X.SMa I a O `1 '7 �^ g22.g INV=921.7q �o t•'• �' 9�2.7 +; RIM=Q31.3 // / 0 SP3 3 �z X931.5 _ SP�) \ g a G q3 kf Q X g32.3 \ M=Q30.8 o. q2 ri rn Q c ,� / <a g32,g NV=927.I 2• g32.6 \ Loucks Project No. 22012 ,�\ X g32.4 ?+� /q3 I.S INV- �. O- g R c•'i 61 j - c� / X UTILITY EASEMENT PER EX.FE�3 ET �y •3 93 / / 1 X g31.3 INV=Q 5 2 ~ 11 111 q20. �> I . 0 �' q3 / /8 GATE o 2yy p , g32.5 e"Pvc Project Lead JJD VO es 0 °�32?a.,' Xc131.7 Xg23 Ex. i\ Co R u q2 Nv=9k 9 o n �h' 931.3 // ° 931 h X931.5 0 ZO *' - -� LI 92/q L X ?+ � ``�°�s / Xg31.4 �ooc. N0. 3gIza38-��i31.2?� -{- L �- ,O / E.sMH '';<< •o / R =932.2 Z Drawn By HW v, , q3 Xg32. g32.3 Q\ a, ^ Checked B TWM X X 4.6 \ s .A E •� G RIM=931.2 u / 0 `g30. Ir / I (N/S)=Q22.I y • f .. g32.g Ex.cB Lg 9 g I I (W)=924.5 U _ - -i Xg20.5 6 Xg23.q \� 922 pB �P / Xq3 4 NV=926.2 g32.2 , 3 O• +�� C7 =9p•z Xg20.4 Q�\' \ a 24 o 5 / 9 q33 ag\' g32.6 - ,\F xg31. aa � \\ x®o. o Review Date 08/05/22 Z g23.7 Cry \ 124.4 9 +s- o •. g30.9 9 // / q31. X g Lo-d 9 --I SKIM` IZ W H +106 M 2 .0 'I- O a )f g316 32 a30 ° to 5 .. .. .q3 . .' ': / X932.7 + 2X9319 9 �_ 9 7 4 � RIM=925.3 9' P / X932.8 9�' •a "� aM- cn / P3i' SHEETINDEX X923.2 INV=91 q3 95 O" X 6 I 924 =22.o(NE) " r / 3 rL' LLI +108 � I 3�:y,R',. � 44;.�'' '" 930.6 / X9 93 3 ,��q3� .° 2c�'/ �� 6 PER p� 7 3 tl �� \ T.^ / a 6 9 I q*o� qs\c�2 q3'A}� g33.2 q� o>, .�' n 0� 4_ 31g8 PVe\ , / o C 107 i rJ / / ry 9 F<F q<AF 932.2 �qq" 932' "� 'Q'''"� i // A Xg31.2 o C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS ✓l.� X921.3 W *g23.6 g23.6 \ s?ems A3,0,. / g33.4 m GATE �2.3 Q' �'', a' ,P.� 93j/ /P , n l C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN 6. 933.5 CONTRO 6 cb U )897 96 / X q23 > s�F yR 930.4 r q3 .8 , 7fg3i4 SP3" / C2-1 SITE PLAN m �l-7 r p 92 Xg20.1 :923.3 a9�On / 3.8'. M M fit' n�\ / / 9P9`3 // p`� �j' � co 6 X g32.8 2. o. / / / } '` � g30.q / + 6 ° , 9 / d r 9549190 921.0 1 )fg23 922.5X ��� \ `\Fi� X932.6 9 0 .•. �\ w CALL ,/ // Fk / ,�31 0� + // C3-1 GRADING PLAN �{ ' ° \ 933.0 J BOX ai / / / `� 931.6X M o� / C3-2 SWPPP PLAN 1 9 3 89 cs r glg.5 �\ 1 �p Xq 2. 930.9 // 2 �� ry� 933.E 9� iT 300 0 03 V Xc120, \ � 23.2 6 X9 P a� X N (� g30.5 / 933.0 \\o �w \ � o a3 / // , 0A3\.6 3n 70 N 75c g23.0 OL� �g2P�,c�O� 6 6 / 99q �934oELEv.- ' w� \ 3. cn Ft / �o�? a 3° 93 I C3-3 SWPPP NOTES \ P�1I q22 Xg22.3 / Xq3 .5 3 os° 93 e . / , �\• 0 / C4-1 UTILITY PLAN � g22.8 X921.�_,�' / / 2 d •-:.° e 6 •• �' ��F� �2•� / � 6 � 9 \ 0^� I^I 92/ X 2 6 / / 9, * ch r o2 cp ,. g3L0 �9 try C8-1 to C8-3 CIVIL DETAILS 076, II Ex.FEs g22.2 93 Xg3 .5 .fl •. 6 0 .sk,74 g22.2 INv o.9 \ N / / �'---FLOOR ELEV. ` N ' 03v- "' 31O „ 0 30.0 L1-1 TREE INVENTORY ✓ 86 921.1 EX.FEs 22.g g22.2 aLr1'• Xc122.2 g28.2 I Xg31.5 q y. 1 =933.9 6;• g33.5 M �N A, 3 03 > 81 `L7'STry - ' * 2q'q ?> 9� 38 I* N q31 9 9 L2-1 LANDSCAPE PLANS '', s / \ o -ROOF ELEV. 6 \ - / L3-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS U a 2� Xq \ a', t '+ 932.7 =g59A g33e q \ 3 S g3g31.7 a^� 90 p 9? Q 0 9 7 X q20 g22.q h A3 / , •, O' m c, 8 0 9 / Cr EXSTING BULDNG "� UT J r > i 1 84 6 0+ \ X g31.1 �, r: g33.3 9 a` Q %8 '7 .2 O�� \ X g22.3 / \ P� a 20,395 90.FT. 2 3o $ X921. / CALL BOX- o /G (AS SHOWN) �^6 0,: \ W A �•� a�3\� �\ / G�o�L°'nyV •13 \ T' \ X 2 .6 ° J }•ii dt-I- 1 ` M=929.1/ � p' g20.1 \ v� \ -Ex.CB ",��>�i �' / Q oQ�� 9 111 0 _ q31. o p 7 / ? O e� �� Pc o u2 /i/ g .I �h. RIM= 3. a / %Q Q •� is \ \ f�26.1 a•9• C) 1 Ww .p q33 :�'�� .6 '� .' 1 INV=Q23.�� 2 0 Q- \ X g22.5 n' 6 ~' ° a Q`� U 12 ql 1 g22.1 Xg22.6 \ � -FLooR ELEv. r N / s o \Q' \ v X g22.7 X 2.8 q28 P AZ°8� 5 A32 O I =g33.B a II r. Ex.STMH N c'co �I, / P.• 923.3X\\ oL9 \ X 3.�i/ 928.1 � N 931 ° ' s: q3 8 ^ \ � g3 s \ n \ O 917.8 Xg21.2 �g23.3 \'k X92� �� . .. -RooF ELEv. \h °' N X 923.1 X 923.2 i \ \ / =g74.1 �: \ 7 m� Q N 9201 X921.8 ��_ _ A _ e, \ h' A o \ ry 2 v g 929.1 3p aC Ex.CB Pq� a 3 9� / I a - Ex. q3 \ N \\ ory"u 0 9? �i 9� g2q.8X X931.5 o I I M q31. q3 92 .4 a 9 0 5 ' Xg22.3 0 4,8 I 3�; 93 \\ RIM=93o.1_� <C N �:g23.2 Xq 7.7 1 WM=931.0 ,�J N�� "6= o° /p 3• 0 J NV=923. _`� •1 yX q Iq.7 X 22.4� 9� 10 P�ROTEctaN 0 F g33. �> a. . 92 J O ^Q 93 AIR HANDLNG q34 y q3 932.7 \ a� 9 .0 g25.1 / �9 \g 9 l� u' °• ECUGhENT-\ a q L� 31� '� NO T2ESSPASS Np 933.0 F =g3a.o 0 9 / 0 c� Q� D .? FLOOR ELEV. 92 .6 1N i, ry \ N g22.8X g23.0 i� Xg26.3 / 9 1 930 0� w9 T T p E2ova SOLI T c \ \\ g 2.2 Xq .2 2 11_ Z_ ?3 ��' c\v / rym 1 9 �c�/ O3, * (As sNowNj \ A �-q - - - M O Xg21.3 X922.2 /��� 0 0� �i 6 ---/\g28.7 1 0�" 9 m X A 4• q��•' .M `� \\\ q �02q.1 �ti EXISTING Ln Xg21.1 / / rz I / - O I \ \ O i� �yPO �� Xc124� / 6j �28.1 0� F Jv 33' 3. \\ O OXc120.5 �X'2. , °/'/ 923.8 (5 g26.2x�i //�i I eR i � n .�� J 9 K \ \\\� 9�9 N g 18.9 X 91 .8 9�A I \ 3q�4 q�p 1 1 g3 Yc g g •6 ROOP ELEv. 9 J \ 7 / I0 CONDITIONS 92 N X�26.4 19 I p /o i 25 0c o j 2�s 9 & ry1 A 955.7--- \ \p o� �� g32.9 / / 9� _ 0 50 100 I u �n / 3 �0 Xg l I � 2 � ' \ 4 33.1Xq2g . qIq * g26.1 I 2O g23.2 o ._ i 2/8 &S SCALE IN FEET C1 Mi 0 EL NOTE: EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING INC., DATED 06/14/2022. TRAINING 8 180 FACILITY BITUMINOUS DRIVE 183 BITUMINOUS DRIVE a 1 - • Hugo, 4 �K�C� X X X X X X , ',. • x x x x x x x x x x 1 2 _0 0FENCE FENCE 184 LATH:--- FENCE I CORNER j -- 60 -- - d qll 79 LATH:---\ { FENCE 186 CORNER q 178 all XCELENERGY 6" +175 7 / 8 88 14 LLET 74 1 0 REMOVE EXISTING CONC. C&G (TYP.) 511 , •• • MALL,4 1 1 911 / 92 ■ � REMOVE EXISTING BIT. TRAIL (TYP.) ■■ LoUCKS / 195 96 PLANNING SB 3 7 " CIVIL ENGINEERING _ wa LAND SURVEYING '171 e.S8 r\ / 7" LEGEND: LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE f FENCE 1 0 gg CORNER ENVIRONMENTAL +172 69 99 LATH:---� / 7" FENCE I I FOUND MONUMENT MARKED RLS44900 FIRE DEPT.CONNECTION uE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 CORNER J d SB / 0 (UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED) HYDRANT ury UNDERGROUND CABLE TV SET 1/2"IRON PIPE � Maple Grove, MN 55369 7" MARKED RLS NO.2571 8 ® CURB STOP uF UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC 763.424.5505 • 201 / I TV CABLE TV PEDESTAL D4 WATER VALVE www.loucksinc.com UT UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE 1 168 02 / I 711 AC AIR CONDITIONER ® BOLLARD ou OVERHEAD UTILITY ❑Ett ELECTRIC METER Cam` FLAG POLE uG UNDERGROUND GAS 206 LIMITS OF WETLAND FILL. luEP ELECTRIC PEDESTAL MB MAILBOX > SANITARY SEWER 208- WETLAND FILL AND Sn N ET ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER -tr TRAFFIC SIGN s5 o MITIGATION BY v_ # O STORM SEWER LIGHT POLE U UNKNOWN MANHOLE I WATERMAIN , CARLSON MCCAIN. d E GUY WIRE SPOT ELEVATION _x_x_ FENCE �3 \ � POWER POLE ® TRAFFIC SIGNAL CURB[TYPICAL] / 1 210 II F GAS MANHOLE ROOF DRAIN3 O 1230 CONTOURS 62 GAS METER AllllkL 1 O 212 m TELEPHONE MANHOLE CONIFEROUS TREE BITUMINOUS SURFACE PEDESTALTELEPHONE 60 514 \ ❑O SANITARY CLEANOUT C DECIDUOUS TREE ILI CONCRETE SURFACE \ 2 SANITARY MANHOLE F r--------------I SB d O or O CATCH BASIN i 1 GRAVEL SURFACE O or ❑ STORM DRAIN CADD QUALIFICATION O 159 Z ® FLARED END SECTION RIP RAP SURFACE S O CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely j _ m O STORM MANHOLE with respect to this project.These CADD files shall not be used ANAGE AND UTLITY EASEMENT PER PLAT OF ROY MOUTOR SECOND ADDITION on other projects,for additions to this project, for completion •156 of this project by others without written approval proval by the 155 8" DEMOLITION LEGEND: Consultant.With the Consultant's approval,others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only.All intentional or unintentional J \ revisions,additions,or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions,additions \ \ REMOVE EXISTING GRAVEL or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any&all responsibilities,claims,and liabilities. +153 zSU BM ITTAUREVIS • " 2 REMOVE EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVING z 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL w t15 --LATH 1 j/'--LATH %�' x x x x x x x x x x x x REMOVE EXISTING CURB & GUTTER, RETAINING WALLS, FENCE, ETC. 48 REMOVE EXISTING UTILITIES 45 +143 REMOVE EXISTING MANHOLES, POWER N9 2 3 POLES, LIGHT POLES, BOLLARDS, PARKING •,42 xx 8 8 METERS, SIGNS, ETC. 13 141 2 28 29 2" 311 139 REMOVE EXISTING TREE (TYP.) •1 �%��� 4 2n +136 + 26 227 x 3" \\ 311 711 140 T + PROFESSIONAL • • 2" 1i 132 31 21I 8 I hereby certify that this plan,spe ation or re rt was 130 \\\ , P r GM 35 n ^ `�.�. - -- SITE DEMOLITION NOTES prepared by me or under su erv' that REMOVE EXISTING \\� �7 30 , /�` x 2" 3 3 - - g0 - I am a duly Licensed Prorf�SsiQI E cle, the \ « C. 231 / \ 3" \� " 11 laws of the State o nesota. r GRAVEL \\\ \ - 3 G \ 1. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING PRIVATE UTILITIES ('� ` \ • 129 \\ 1 + I� GAS 0 / ` v V 3" AS NECESSARY. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE ACTIVITIES WITH UTILITY `" 127 \ h° GM\+ / ` _ 3 11 3" COMPANIES. T / cLouth-PE �?&AINAGE AND UTLITY EASEMENT PER , wry+ \ FELD �- ,1 n u I z ] PLAT OF ROY MOUTOR SECOND ADDYfk, / - _ EDGE 2 (� 3 'WATER Llcens o� 20383 1 1 + ° / \\`� EX.SMH - - - �� 3" !!�� „ 3" CE\�► n PER PLAN Date 1 1 / >DRANAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT q• \+ / , . RM�33.2 - PE'�//'A 5^� RM�i32.7 1 2 3 / 2. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE FEATURES NOT 1 I / PLAT OF ROY NOUTOR ADDITION / `ENV=927.5 Q DRANAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENI 1�V=g26.7 2�� AINAGE AN7 UTLITY EA RZ `_ - "� � � Gj�Plr\T OF ROY MOU ADDITION l� - - T OF ROY MOUTOR SEC ADDN 1 1 �Gg�/ I NOTED FOR REMOVAL. QUALITY CONTROL FILW n P I i t EX. > i J 211 - - E M=930.5 LATH RM_131.1 /' �`� , �� X ua x UG G In } �, I p� 3. CONTRACTOR TO CLEAR AND GRUB EXISTING VEGETATION WITHIN Loucks Project No. 22012 z / Io•%16• S O : • 311 311 p S 3 311 SP3" j �o CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, STRIP TOP SOIL, AND STOCKPILE ON-SITE. REFER TO Project Lead JJD EX.CB P ';'• .' - �` •,`,•° ° \ / + 3 G \ SP3" Jlii� -''��- w I GRADING PLAN AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN FOR SEDIMENT AND EROSION Drawn By HW z -EX.FES •I' dx�y CsQ• • /.AT /�� r .• r �• EX.CB " UG UG / iY " _ O INV=g21.7 2M-929. O �' G '••.•• / _ RM�31.3 / SP3 3" SP3„ !� - SP �,, X.SMH CONTROL REQUIREMENTS. Checked By TWM• INV=927.1 / ' \ 1 M=930.8EX.FES ET (r ' '�c/ '�' • • / E •o t % � / INV=925.2 8��PVC Review Date 08/05/22 O 11 INV=919 FN-9KIg8 ��j�/ cONraOLS- o'•, t / / X 3" DNo AS 3q�12438P� > > E.SMH 4. CLEAR AND GRUB AND REMOVE ALL TREES, VEGETATION AND SITE DEBRIS SHEET INDEX r✓ •1- �g „ { rx'�' Ex.ce ' Ste' �, ° Ex.ce T Q3 / PRIOR TO GRADING. ALL REMOVED MATERIAL SHALL BE HAULED FROM THE LU - - R11=g3L2 n 5 (N/S)=922.1 - - •�p2' "� t'1-929.8 •' INV=g26.2 •` ,, 3 �/ -7 VV SITE DAILY. ALL CLEARING AND GRUBBING AND REMOVALS SHALL BE C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS `•_�X.SKIMMER /_01 REMOVE EXISTING CONC. PAVEMENT (TYP.) / / �/ PERFORMED PER THE CONTRACT SPECIFICATIONS. EROSION CONTROL C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN +106 RM=g25.3 o F 0' + Gy3 , + I MEASURES SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY ESTABLISHED UPON REMOVAL. SEE THE C2-1 SITE PLAN j +108 INV=glq.3(NW) 4� '•.•'.,. / / '% v / INV=g22.0(I�) , � `� `''•: s /� EXISTING FENCING AND GATE TO REMAIN ,�° 6 PNca� > i 3 / C3-1 GRADING PLAN GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN. LIL 107 I ti z •. •, / 3" GA1E �:': 7/ / i C3-2 SWPPP PLAN I / \ / vS' CONTROLS__ / / / c 5. CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE ALL SITE SURFACE FEATURES WITHIN REMOVAL C3-3 SWPPP NOTES )8 97 96 I i sR ,R / / / / i / SP3" "~+� N s2 / ; mop, // + > # / , / ; / # •�1�� ti / LIMITS UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. C4-1 UTILITY PLAN CY) 959 Js89R ( � Q �\ ° o \ l B�L / /// o C8-1 to C8-3 CIVIL DETAILS T 1 1 // ?o \ 7 // i ' ' 311 /a L1-1 TREE INVENTORY J • 75 \� 1\ �\ � �`q / i FLOOR EIEv.� ° ` ` c F / / av 3" L2-1 LANDSCAPE PLANS > P / =g34.0 /o x / REMOVE EXI ING BITUMINOUS PAVING V \\ \� .�v�� i �8 3e9� L3-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS Q 76 Ex.FES`\ / ••o86 '• aQ•? / � �i 74 NV=g20.9 \ / I + � --FLOOR ELEV. ° •• Q 85 EX.FES >\ I ryry. \ -133.q J'� i 3" 81 NV=g21.1 \ / ( I 3 ROOF ELEV. 3 �5q,y � ` -� / CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! �j9 7 1 84 \ \ \ \ / \` \ EXISTNG BIAIDING UT N 8 7 CALL BOX- o ° /�+� (ASSHOWN / / \ qp RIM=929.1 Gopher State One Cal 0 •4" � /-Ex.cB }fig\ Q ( TWIN CITY AREA:651-454-0002 N •5 \ Gq ° �/ C14 4 3 \\ \ oily' o a o �o TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 N 12 i \ \ / �� / REMOVE EXISTING °�Q` / N \ \ / � \\ 0) ••'r "7, (-FIAOR ELEV. / X.31'fN \ / . �' . s, tr.• \ =933.8 CONC. C&G (TYP.) \\ \ --- .' `\ / P•• i D ° =g74.lELEV. f, / ADJUST AND REPLACEEX.CI3 `. •,• "C Cy.CB011 INMT pFp�9/,L ° i / CASTING AS NEEDED \ N"v Q235� `�' Q' / N WARNING: c� '� I PROTEcnON DO�� ^' o> AYL HANDLING rLOo �� `� I THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS DEMOLITION N /�i' / I C �'yD ° EOIAPMENr-\ ` _FLOOR ELEV 0 `\ `�� LL OF ALL EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY NO TRESSPASS / //����{{ I `� COMPANIES IN MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND / OR RELOCATION OF N i' / I �� O�l�/ FT =934.0 E20,478 Q.Fr. `� \ \\` 4� ■ LAN N / i' TG // I / �/ �/T O (AS SHOWN) ` / LINES. o / . // �0 /��St rF�_ \`\_\ / ��L 0 50 100 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT v C) 651-454-0002 AT LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF 00 ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, C) VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE DIGGING. THE SCALE IN FEET CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED C1 m2 o DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. EL WARNING: CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! SITE NOTES NOTE. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL Gopher State One Call EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN 1. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES. (t, TWIN CITY AREA:651-454-0002 ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY CORNERSTONE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, 2. ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA LAND SURVEYING INC., DATED 06/14/2022. CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE TRAINING DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED STANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS. DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. FACILITY 3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. \� BITUMINOUS DRIVE PROPOSED SUBSTATION AREA PROJECT PROPOSED IN-PROCESSING BUILDING PROJECT a BITUMINOUS DRIVE 5. TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9' X 18' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 55038 -x x_ -x FENCE -x X 6. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 5.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � � �� � � ��N ��� � � lBSd lBSd �BSd �8sd �BSd �8sd lesd -Il lBSd I8 ��8sd �BSd �BSd ill lesd lend lose Mesa �ese., ease lose ease-lose-lose��ese lose lese lose Mesa Jose 7. SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING. m J 29 m U) ' 8. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN FOR BUILDING SETBACKS. x � r x x�k\ I 11 5 18.0'_ I I _9.0' S,R --M 80 -- -� CD k-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x X 11 I ��-1TYP B612 C&G (TYP.) 24.0 TYP J -� TYP q DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS ®® I I II 5'R 5'R q�� BUILDING SETBACKS: FRONT 30 FT MINIMUM XCELENERGY POLE HEIGHT=105'x � I I 24.0' 2 24.0 J J SIDE EQUAL TO HEIGHT OF BUILDING I I I 2 m V) $� (NOT LESS THAN 10 FT) MINIMUM a k xU REAR 30 FT MINIMUM 9.0, 5'R 18.0'_ 5'R 6" / PROPOSED SUBSTATION I r TYP 24.0' 161 TYP OFF-STREET PARKING AND DESIGN STANDARD REQUIREMENTS . -O / k SEE PLANS PREPARED BY OTHERS I I I -� 5'R OFF-STREET PARKING SETBACKS: J $" CONCRETE APRON FRONT 10 FT MINIMUM POLE HEI HT=83' 11 i 2 5'R m SEE CITY DETAIL SIDE 5 FT MINIMUM ■ a I III -� � I I I I � �21 24 0' - w I i REAR 5 FT MINIMUM ■■ 11 24.0' 2 'R LouCKS A / x I III 5'R 18.0' S'R 51R MINIMUM PARKING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS (90 DEGREE PATTERN): 24.0' f- TYP 24.0' 18.0' PARKING SPACE WIDTH = FT / III 5'R 5'R 5'R I 5'R 5'R 5'R PARKING SPACE LENGTH = 18 FT PLANNING k J DRIVE LANE WIDTH = 24 FT CIVIL ENGINEERING I 11 2 5 a° 0 Mn d 25'R LAND SURVEYING (n LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE * I 8j6 � 24.0' - ENVIRONMENTAL POLE HEIGHT=62' I32.0 ° 7� SITE DATA CURRENT ZONING: BUSINESS PARK7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 I „ ` _ 1R 70 PROPOSED ZONING: BUSINESS PARK Maple Grove, MN 55369 POLE HEIGHT=57' It � CONCRETE 5 R763.424.5505 PAVEMENT FLAT CURB .0' m J �a x www.loucksinc.com �x x x-x-x-x x m m T PROPERTY AREA: 1,226,373 SF/±28.1 AC 0 ,1 TYPICAL ADA �,o / 25'R \\ �� _47.4' „ PARKING STALLS m / \ GRAVEL PARKING AREA \ „ SEE DETAIL 61 7M I PROPOSED BUILDING AREA: 70,488 sf/±1.6 ac (5.7%) / 50'R \ \�\ \\\ POLE HEIGHT=57' „ / ALLOWED UP TO 40/o ADA SIGN TYP at PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 514,677 sf/±11.8 ac (41.9%) Vo POND 1 SEE DETAIL ' $, n ALLOWED UP TO 80% 2 J NWL=924.0 ' ^ 15'R ; J m �°r° / °cn° I 20'R co 0� \ \ HWL=926.9 I ° a m a a POLEHEIGHT=85' \\ POLEHEIGHT=52' \ \\ 4' ` BTM=918.0 PROPOSED a z I OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS POLE HEIGHT=43' \ PATIO` IN-PROCESSING 20�\\ A�� BUILDING CODE REQUIRED PARKING FOR PROPOSED BUILDING �� o I 34,740 OFFICE BUILDING / 200 =173 PARKING STALLS 6200 TRAINING LABS / 500 =13 PARKING STALLS i J ' / 01�0 QSB 5R m J = CADD • • a \ � -e3 POLE HEIGHT=52' o �1 SB _ a P,�2 m aTOTAL =186 PARKING STALLS gFFE-933.0 „ N I CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are � instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely / POLE HEIGHT=64' \ \ \ w o „ z .f� z with respect to this project.These CADD files shall not be used / POLE HEIGHT-48' \\ _z on other projects,for additions to this project,or for completion \ Z �- of this project by others without written approval by the 24.0' m PROPOSED PARKING PROVIDED Consultant.With the Consultant's approval,others may be FLAT CURB -6 permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawingfiles for _47.4' ` I J EXISTING STALLS REMOVED =22 for nation and reference only.All intentional or unintentional / W POLE HEIGHT=79' \ \ �/ - ,/ / \ , M J $M Q revisions,additions,or deletions to these CADD files shall be n� POND 2 24' _ , �� 0 m PROPOSED STALLS =351 made at the full risk of that party making such revisions,additions ' I NWL=919.6 \ TYP - \ Is I y9'0 _J NEW TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED =329 Consulor tant from anyhat&a all responsibilities, hold harmless clams, indemnify the HWL-920.6 POLE HEIGHT=55' POLE HEIGHT=57' -L TYP qM J I Consultant from any&all responsibilities,claims,and liabilities. BTM-914.0 / \ r \ ` „ CONCRETE PAVEMENT d m • ' I / \\50'R c r \ \\ POLEHEIGHT=52' „ / LEGEND - POLE HEIGHT=57' Q 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL + '� PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINES \\\ r \\ lit / to ` CONCRETE SIDEWALK(TYP.) I co I (SEE PLANS PREPARED BY OTHERS) „ EXISTING PROPOSED ' \\\ \\ II / FUTURE SOLAR m m z �® CATCH BASIN •■ 1 \\\ 20 R 50 \\ ` , X TRAINING AREA 1TYP m LLU OO STORM MANHOLE Q 14 5 R I 1 FLARED END SECTION ` " \ \ FUTURE WIND 1 O SANITARY MANHOLE POLE HEIGHT=70' \ \ \ TURBINE TRAINING 9 HYDRANT 4 co co CO \ p \ \ \\ AREA „ a # pd GATE VALVE H r 10 20'R 1 ., ° ° m ° m J ,- , � \\ \0 m m POST INDICATOR VALVE OPiv / POLE HEIGHT=61' \\\ \ POLE HEIGHT=52' I I ® WATER MANHOLE/WELL + \ POLE HEIGHT=61' \\ 8 \ \ � � LIGHT POLE � ' I POLE HEIGHT=70'� \ \\ 20,R \ 4.5 R 6 5'R M O POWER POLE Im w \ ♦ \\ �, 16 4.5'R �� ^° J $ O ELECTRIC METER ♦ \ O �� m J © GAS METERPROFESSIONAL O \ +�,♦ �� 4.5'R 24.0' °�° Cn m 7" ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL SIGNATUREd I hereby certify that this plan,spe i anon or re rt was I \ , T + ♦♦ 5 B612 C&G (TYP.) „ + 6 5'R SIGN prepared by me or under"�' ire su ervU that + ; ; \♦♦ POLE HEIGHT=57' \ J „ 24•0 1 8 OrIf I am a duly$" I BENCHMARK of he Stat Licensed Mied La[ds `e \chitt\ r the laws 1 I I a P GM ♦ ~♦ 15'\\\ �� em TY - -- 80 -- - SOIL BORING �B- 4f Vv '� m ; « \♦♦ ♦ \ \ �� + 5'R 20 R J PARKING STALL COUNT a�.Ekhoff-LA Ir I CU I + GAS 0 ♦♦ ♦♦ \\\ 24.0' 12 6 Cn m ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL Licens I`�o 52050 I PROPOSED FENCE \ \ �4 4.5'R m >> STORM SEWER Date �j `' L A d EP « ♦♦ 10'R AND GATE TO \, MATCH EXISTING \ 9 0' `-5.0' 6 1 I » aT- DRAINTILE » oT- • CONTROL POLE HEIGHT=66' , GM + �I/ ♦♦ 5'R TY 6 4.5'R I > SANITARY SEWER1110 0`� / ♦ �� 25.0' `�`- , FM FORCEMAIN FU Loucks Project No. 22012 + ® � �. 10.5 ' I WATERMAIN i Project Lead JJ o''� « « 5'RX-M ' m m s SANITARY SEWER SERVICE ,, Drawn By CEF ♦ 24.0 5 R a -/-/- Checked By NWE z P �' :yly /'�� 5'R w WATER SERVICE - Review Date 08/05/22 l8S8 `� ° 0 24.0 g + \d*� G GP` .'''• /// \\ @ / i/ a 5'R r I ELE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ELE w , SHEET INDEX / � ® UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC \ ❑ •r `' / " •...• ' GATE •o•• t '%•r / \\� 24.0 FO FO CONTROLS- °' • / / C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS `) ® � 24.0' GAs UNDERGROUND GAS -GAS N TEL TEL C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN U , / m r., C2-1 SITE PLAN / ♦ m UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE - +�. : ; %/ { e+ 5'R Q ,� off OVERHEAD UTILITY off C3-1 GRADING PLAN + , 4 - :;°: G� ,/ 5'R 1 1 I -x x- FENCE -x X- C3-2 SWPPP PLAN N , / G': / - ' ` s "• / �R 6 -a o- CHAIN LINK FENCE -�� C3-3 SWPPP NOTES N _ , RYscyF '9': 3n CONCRETE SIDEWALK(TYP.) u�°. •♦ 5 R C4-1 UTILITY PLAN 0 POLE HEIGHT=71' , ; ssR ��sr o °°"rROLS ♦♦ 7 24.0' S R v , CONCRETE CURB C8-1 to C8-3 CIVIL DETAILS JI \\\\ + ♦ 5,R `�� a a RETAINING WALLTREE INVENTORY 0. ° ♦♦ 5'R a CONCRETE L2-1 LANDSCAPE PLANS V T 1 .0 `� L3-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS Q � / / FLooR ELEv.� • �\ ` NO PARKING Q ``� ; i / =934.0 /0 ♦♦ 5 R ¢ I I BUILDING p i i �e \ 3 41 ♦ `0�2� CONTOUR / + �__FooR ELEv. ♦ �" x972 s SPOT ELEVATION X972.5 I =933.9 a o V POLE HEIGHT=52', \\ i/ �ryti -RooF HEv. 3 '� � 3 " ♦♦♦ 5'R Q ' Iox DIRECTION OF FLOW E1.0/ =999.9 Gq MATCH EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTNG BUILDING PARKING SETBACK LINE �sBL o BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ♦ ' CALL BOX-� o GP 20,395 SOFT. .,i ♦ 23 , No \\ �9L \\ / / \°° \a (AS SHOWN) 4' ♦ " O� I BUILDING SETBACK LINE �sBL IQ 4W# ,,p.lF' •e• •_ -FLOOR H.EV. > • \\ \ ,/ ,i' G1F' .I•• G �\ =933.8 ,\ �\ .0 261� \ ° + i . �' J o - _ - PAVEMENT LEGEND C d \ \ �'' . . °,�4•0,•� ^. i-ROOF ELEV. \ o , ` .•'•' -N\ 00 \ - ` IsP' / �74'' - - - DENOTES LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT c ^, s ° I ' \\ ` o N AR HALING oo' .\ DENOTES HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SITE PLAN J C, ^ ti \ ` O l '/ fy/ i '`/ ° EouvrlENr-\ `__FLOOR ELEV. ° ' D =g34.0 CASTING BuwNG �' �`/ O 50 100 DENOTES CONCRETE PAVEMENT ") NO TRESSPASS / ' / I T 20,975 soar. ` i �j (As SHOWN) ` o DENOTES GRAVEL PAVEMENT SCALE IN FEET C2mi 0 CL NOTE: CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! WARNING: GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES GRADING, DRAINAGE & EROSION CONTROL SPECIFICATIONS EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS Gopher State One Cal I THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL SEE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN FOR SOIL STABILIZATION INFORMATION. 1. SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY CORNERSTONE TWIN CITY AREA:651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES. EROSION AND SEDIMENTATION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED AROUND THE ENTIRE LAND SURVEYING INC., DATED 06/14/2022. TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT SITE PERIMETER AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT REQUIREMENTS, BEST MANAGEMENT 2. CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE BUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, PRACTICES, CITY REQUIREMENTS AND THE DETAILS SHOWN ON THE CIVIL DETAILS SHEETS OF THESE IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.10 FEET. RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT TRAINING CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE PLANS. SUMPED ELEVATIONS. DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED I DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 6 FACILITY ALL CURB SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE TO GUTTER LINE-UNLESS NOTED OTHE \ 3. ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF PREMIUM TOP SOIL / 6 6 6 a AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BE WATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR p9�\ 811UMINOUS DRIVE w UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. VERIFY WITH LANDSCAPE PLAN. _ Blvd N, Hugo, MN Q BITUMINOUS DRIVE I - 4. FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF x 55038 des �8S8 �BSd �8S8 �eSd rE EpICE -°- '� ' ' WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED / 928 �BSd �BSd �BSd d lesd lesd lesd lend �BSd �BSd 18S8 l8S �8S8 l8S8 l8S8 l8S8 lBSob lose l8S8� WALL COURSES). 1 924 m J 2� 926 cn a- m 930 1 0 5. REFER TO THE REPORT OF GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION AND REVIEW (REPORT N0.16.61753.100), 9 28 LATH:-- 3 .5 0� ;; 00 DATED 12/08/16 AS PREPARED BY NORTHERN TECHNOLOGIES INC. FOR AN EXISTING SUBSURFACE - j 931 0\x-_x� \ c p °�� - \ ' q" 80 SITE CONDITION ANALYSIS AND CONSTRUCTION RECOMMENDATIONS. x-x- x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x- x-x-x-x- `_ N j x 931. x 931.5 931.5 x i a se 0 931. / se 1 4 9 6. STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND B '` / \ ®® 930.3 q" BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDS AND HOLIDAYS, OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY. A REGULAR 21• `0 926 MXCELENERGY I SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED. I x / x o m °No1 8"/ M 9 _0 / / I -T74 2 0 5 / I 7. DUST MUST BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED. 9.5 2 % / �i o 9 8. SEE SWPPP FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES AND REQUIREMENTS. • O co( / o \ ell .,,3� J g" \ 9. SEE UTILITY PLAN FOR WATER, STORM AND SANITARY SEWER INFORMATION. 2 r., x931.5 / / / x IS313 931.3 � b7 I N 00 10. SEE SITE PLAN FOR CURB AND BITUMINOUS TAPER LOCATIONS. m j /`ti x 932.0 x 932.0 9331 e e x x M a ( ■ °j cn x 932.0 I N \ 1 1. A STREET SWEEPER MUST BE AVAILABLE WITHIN 3 HOURS UPON NOTICE FROM THE CITY THAT THE ■■ LouCKS L \ x rn "932.1 \ 932. �`�•, STREETS NEED TO BE SWEPT. / k I I O� I 30.2 \ 931. PLANNING -932 2 12. THE CONTRACTOR ALONG WITH THE OWNER SHALL OBTAIN ALL NECESSARY PERMITS AND CIVIL ENGINEERING % x 931. °�° m APPROVALS FROM GOVERNING AUTHORITIES, INCLUDING ANY CITY PERMITS AND THE NPDES LAND SURVEYING ^� I / se 31 / * I o \ 932 00 " PERMIT FROM THE MPCA. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE `1.AT / 1 B1s I \ I 7 I 13. INSTALL EROSION CONTROL AND TREE PROTECTION MEASURES BEFORE BEGINNING SITE GRADING ENVIRONMENTAL C,30.777 56 �_ 93 •5x 932.. ACTIVITIES. SOME EROSION CONTROLS SUCH AS BALE CHECKS AND TEMPORARY SILT PONDS MAY 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 x / '' 931. a- I BE INSTALLED AS GRADING OCCURS IN SPECIFIC AREAS. MAINTAIN EROSION CONTROLS Maple Grove, MN 55369 sB15 B14 g " THROUGHOUT THE GRADING PROCESS AND REMOVE WHEN TURF HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. 763.424.5505 �a se I x�x x 931.5 x 931.5 931.5 �929.15 \ 30.67 m � m " www.loucksinc.com x x-x-x-x x \ �"� 9''� 0- 14. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL ADHERE TO ALL REQUIREMENTS OF THE MPCA NPDES PERMIT. THE AREA •cp M TO BE DISTURBED SHALL BE MINIMIZED AND TURF SHALL BE ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE TIME 7" REQUIRED. / rn ^ d •t'S I w I x 930.6 x 931.0 POND 1 rn ' �ti I g" N 15. GRADES SHOWN ARE FINISHED GRADES. NWL=924.0 ' 932Y.5331.7om _ I m 30 HWL=926.9 I 932 4 m a 16. FINAL GRADING TOLERANCES ARE +/-0.1 FEET TO FINISH GRADES. BTM=918.0 I C` I o 931. 17. UNDER PAVEMENTS COMPACT THE UPPER 3 FEET OF SUBGRADE TO 100% STANDARD PROCTOR 3 N / I I DENSITY AT OPTIMUM MOISTURE CONTENT AND 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY BLOW THE 21/ / SB m UPPER 3 FEET OF SUBGRADE. OUTSIDE PAVEMENT AREAS COMPACT EMBANKMENTS TO 95% i 7 932.0 I STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY. 92 8 \ d \ �/e✓F 9SBI 30816 a ��� M m I = '� °� N a 18. WORKING HOURS ARE 7:00 AM - 10:00 PM, MONDAY - SATURDAY. A 48 HOUR NOTICED IS ' I N 1 se N / FFE=933.0 Im I a 2 B4 I 93 5 \ / REQUIRED FOR SATURDAY WORK. CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are 923.47 O> p I instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely � N I Z with respect to this project.These CADD files shall not be used � �, I F O 19. THE CONTRACTOR MUST HAVE A CITY LICENSE. on other projects,for additions to this project,or for completion \ m of this project by others without written approval by the zConsultant.With the Consultant's approval,others may be o / x931.7 J I 20. A CITY RIGHT-OF-WAY PERMIT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO WORKING WITHIN CITY ROW. permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for n N x (+L " information and reference only.All intentional or unintentional POND 2 / l 929 5 \ / W � 8 0 revisions,additions,or deletions to these CADD files shall be NWL=919.0 / I I "� 21. TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT (TRM) SHALL BE LANDLOK 450 AS MANUFACTURED BY PROPEX made at the full risk of that party making such revisions,additions pJ cJ J ' or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the I HWL=920.6 \ o 9" Im GEOSOLUTIONS, OR APPROVED EQUAL. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FOLLOW ALL OF THE Consultant from any&all responsibilities,claims,and liabilities. BTM=914.0 / a� N I MANUFACTURERS INSTRUCTIONS FOR INSTALLATION. SU BM ITTAUREVIS IONS < < X 32.5 > + I / /JiI I z Q 22. STRUCTURAL RETAINING WALL, FENCING AND HANDRAIL DESIGN BY OTHERS. REFER TO 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL 9 5 6 m J � ARCHITECTURAL PLANS. N m z � N / -� x 927.0 x 83.7 x 931.22 93 5 � ` W L.L 931.0 32.9 93 . I / f 33 ..� 21 O x I I 93 9 9 1. 932 m x931.0 m �, LEGEND m EXISTING PROPOSED + , I x929.5 I x929.5 01 ^� 93 ( �® CATCH BASIN �O STORM MANHOLE 0 I `O 32.1 > FLARED END SECTION -44 30.3 J 8" • I cb / O sass m SANITARY MANHOLE + 9�' 29. 13tsom11 m 7' HYDRANT PROFESSIONAL \ \ 932.0 I hereby certify that this plan,spe ation or re rt was I O / T x929 5 ti �3 J , 8 I GATE VALVE N prepared by me or under su ery that \9 " POST INDICATOR VALVE o°Piv I am a duly Licensed Prot ssidx3I El nder the 21 I x a 9 P GM a `%� 3 ^\ •0� _ -- 80 ® WATER MANHOLE/WELL ® laws of the State o, rnesota. ` (' X` o �V) \ i k 931 931.5 W N m `� • \ C� ?3 LIGHT POLE GAS 9u> 1 i cn m ` / 0 POWER POLE 0 \ /�� t p 0 ? 93 m W \ Licens fro T1(4: cBoUtl,-PE 20383 GM�+ \` + 31 0 a- I OE ELECTRIC METER Date 9' \ ✓ / •� P i 933� `• � \ 30.5 930 30.0 PER PLAN l © GAS METER x 22 / / 93/� GM xx / \ ���\ 933� _ O TELEPHONE PEDESTAL QUALITY CONTROL / / /0• • 03? > ' >- 30.7 30.0 I �/ SIGN Loucks Project No. 22012 ao \ 1` \ \ ° Project Lead JJD LA1W / �"� / I / 31. m J -0B BENCHMARK J z \ • F x m Drawn By HW Q 22 ,�ll� C • & • ? -_ -� a tB-7 SOIL BORING �B- Checked By TWM�8S8 o� &• . PARKING STALL COUNT (7 1 \ / r \\\\ �µb \ � GP / U: I i ,0 Review Date 08/05/22 k ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL ET Cr •,•' ,� `� �•.,' ' GATE •o f..••f �� , 3� » SHEET INDEX �yo/ ' i s 931. > > - STORM SEWER - C7 QI ,� x` S�h �i� 931. > » Dr DRAINTILE » DT C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS �92i l) \� r� m > C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN v 1 / /1\ ��,� \ 1P i'/ / \ I A33"� \ \ 931. `31' °�'�`� Qm V v FM SANITARY SEWER C2-1 SITE PLAN I ---- \\( G� # /+ �' \ \�9. FORCEMAI N + / _ i \ ? �' 30.3 I WATERMAIN i C3-1 GRADING PLAN 6 set j �q24_ 1_� - \\/ / w ° f' 30.6 I - - - C3-2 SWPPP PLAN s SANITARY SEWER SERVICE C3-3 SWPPP NOTES s 6 9a \ \ ry � s ': 3" GATE fw�.' 31.5 •5 W WATER SERVICE - - ''� I I �q23 `\\\ 'S3�`��'Sg \/ / \ CONTROLS-_ •. / / V C4-1 UTILITY PLAN 1 \ 1 / \ \ o \ o \ .�\ ��, V/ ELE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ELE C8-1 to C8-3 CIVIL DETAILS I ( / \ \\\� ,�` ah /� I / + 9 0< ° \ �` ---CALL 31.6 31.1 ¢� �3 F° UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC Fo L1-1 TREE INVENTORY v Tom\ I Ni 11 \ ; ?o• 4ti 9��� B0X GAS UNDERGROUND GAS GAS L2-1 LANDSCAPE PLANS �' 6` i J l FLOOR ELEv ° f � \` Y / TEL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE TEL L3 1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS Q I / a22/ =934.0 �03e :.o• �v -7/ Pr OH o ` 6 ! , V�' OVERHEAD UTILITY off O\ r r I __F�ooR ctEv. ��`� Q -x x- FENCE -X lI- Q r� ' 1 I/ \ I rL• \\ =933.9 •3• I Q Q / / ([ 1 i Id I _ q31_ -o o- CHAIN LINK FENCE \ / / ( I N ROOF ELEV. �� 3 y / %� ' -959.9 CONCRETE CURB 930.2 N EXISTING BULDNG `�. T O /,� P � 20395 SOFT. °' 9 -� I RETAINING WALL N / / /\ ,f CALL BOX-'` o /G (AS SHOWN) cCNJ ` \� �'\ ° o' �� 4' I ^ a a a CONCRETE ° o \ Ilk\ ' "c ch ° ° R?o * 'its \ -1 0 \{ / NO PARKING \� / / FLOOR ELEV. (- 933.8 \.. � /����,� BUILDING I 6 °Q: I 1''^� \�� .ham ,' o / `0�2� CONTOUR � �• -RooF El.�v. o I � 972.5 / / =av4.l _ xs725 SPOT ELEVATION X / / I \ �� �� r //V/ ° i o �' I - - - '°R DIRECTION OF FLOW E ` GRADING � �+9 °' /�`3> aR HANDLING p0 \ ` " �� - / _N- TREE LINE PLAN o I ,�' \ 1 I �f i� I �� `9 nD \ EQuvr>ENT-�� A _FwoR_ELEv. r..�e1.ry,, o,� `, _ I . L� I' PARKING SETBACK LINE �SBL Nn TPG4COAce N 0 0 50 100 BUILDING SETBACK LINE SBL 00 0 c3ml 2 SCALE IN FEET NOTE: EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING INC., DATED 06/14/2022. TRAINING 1 \ \ 1111FACILITY l EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 6 \ 6 c, �1 TYP-SEE DETAIL \ 6 6 a SILT FENCE 9 P BITUMINOUS DRIVE w • 1 - C • Hugo, TYP-SEE DETAIL a BITUMINOUS DRIVE \� F < I 1 d \ x x —_x—_�32—� LEGEND lBSd 8Sd d lesd �'� ^ s1����s �r EXISTING PROPOSED S8 9281 l8S 38S8 l8S lose l8S8 CBS lose 38S8 1 �S dS m � J 00 CATCH BASIN •■ \ LATH:-- —�� IN E 00 0STORM MANHOLE Q �0�-1 -,{— PRO E TI N \ vL`i - 80 -- -� FLARED END SECTION / x�x— —x—x—x—x—x—x—x—x--x—x—x— x—X—X—X—X­ TYP-SEE qr DETAIL I x _E cc- �� x SB1 O SANITARY MANHOLE 00 If N ER / / SB11 I rn a 9 0 9' HYDRANT /II B x / ®® �930.3 6 926. � I D4 GATE VALVE N ■ v / w —931 rn xGY N m / POST INDICATOR VALVE @Ply SILT F NCE STAGE 2 / 77 '74 1 1 F m V) 0- 8 \ ® WATER MANHOLE/WELL T P-SEE DETAIL" / I / \ � ;rf LIGHT POLE � x / O POWER POLE 0 414 NICOLLET 930 M � OE ELECTRIC METER MINNE MN APOLIS, 55401 / I � Al 8 © GAS METER b/ i N IS313 `" U aID TELEPHONE PEDESTAL 081 933SIGN ■ k I I ROCK 01 OBM BENCHMARK LoUCKS DOUBLE ROW a> I , i \ CONSTRUCTION SOIL BORING B- PLANNING SILT FENCE / LT FE CE TA pN ENTRANCE 2 PARKING STALL COUNT 2� TYP-SEE DETAIL ?LT E AI 934— I N SEE DETAIL Q CIVIL ENGINEERING x •, m (- ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL LAND SURVEYING / VV CIA L—932 ' �V) STORM SEWER LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DRAINTILE a � \ 7M � >' oT— >' oT— ENVIRONMENTAL CAT ` 1 e10 x > SANITARY SEWER POI r NER / 1.s6 � __ FM FORCEMAIN 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 `k r I 70 I WATERMAIN I Maple Grove, MN 55369 COSB 3 X� / a2915 3067 m 763.424.5505 0 a, m �. —/—/— www.loucksinc.com �a 9 99 I k�x x x—x—x—x x m s SANITARY SEWER SERVICE m l w WATER SERVICE —I— / / 1 7' F I ELE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ELE W Fo UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC Fo POND 1 rn ' SB J I I 8. v cas UNDERGROUND GAS —GAS I NWL-924.0 N I �931,70m t/► m TEL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE TEL 3 I I HWL=926.9 m U N OH OVERHEAD UTILITY off IBTM=918.0 I o —x x— FENCE —X�I— oj �, I I —o o— CHAIN LINK FENCE 9 N / CONCRETE CURB 92 3. 8 I \ ' ^ o� RETAINING WALL SBI 930816 m/ a '6 T�I J = •e a o• a a m CONCRETE CADD • • `0 D_ a NO PARKING SB4 <v SB / FFE=933.0 2 t� � v1 CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are (q 923 47 O> I \ BUILDING instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project.These CADD files shall not be used 6 I N M / I CONTOUR l2�� P P 1 r O 9 on other projects,for additions to this project,or for completion / J \ / m x972 5 972.5 of this project by others without written approval by the N 7 SPOT ELEVATION 1 00� Consultant.With the Consultant's approval,others may be M / J -n I L E °� DIRECTION OF FLOW � permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for N N J information and reference only.All intentional or unintentional POND 2 l l \ rn "' m 8N 0 TREE LINE revisions,additions,or deletions to these CADD files shall be NWL=919.0 / I / d I > made at the full risk of that party making such revisions,additions HWL-920.6 \ N J PARKING SETBACK LINE �sBL or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the I = M O q, I Consultant from any&all responsibilities,claims,and liabilities. BTM=914.0 < < N N m BUILDING SETBACK LINE �seL • NS + I d / I ` ` Itoo I z < 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL m \ / SB21 SB M w I 93 s LL B3 x 931.22 � O I I / N 930 9� 932 \J II a m m �^° GENERAL NOTES + ate- SILT FENCE i I I I YP-S E DETAILI 9� ' 0 SEE SHEET C3-3 FOR SWPPP NOTES v�i o / ' + �/ 9"� ° 931.60m M �, / SWPPP LEGEND • -• • I hereby certify that this plan,spe anon or re rt was prepared by me or under re su ervj6fe ' that + • \ 'Co '� cn M �SF� SILT FENCE � � J � � 8 I am a duly Licensed Prort�ssi I Ea§r� nder the laws of the State qLtAnesota.1�7 ( \� 3 -f INLET PROTECTION CO W m Xk 1 23 J �/ �— / + , ® ?\ .,�— / / \ 93 m M Licensto\ CID T Mth PE20383 m GAS $, N m EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERN �/� ` + °- Date PRPL92 E M PROPOSED DRAINAGE PATTERN 2 QUALITY CONTROL SF 924 ti � / 'O'X�s + 0 3?\ / > ' I -\� EROSION CONTROL BLANKET Loucks Project No. 22012 1 >— m s�i 924 `-'� / + � 1 / � \ � x x > m J Project Lead JJD LA.J F m m Drawn By HW Checked By TWM g �8S8 1 \ \\ CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! y\ - G " r• V/' ' � C T Review Date 08/05/22 GAOQ TE •o r,%•r ,-y ' �� Gopher State One Cal N TWIN CITY AREA:651-454-0002 N 1 �q?> ) /�k� Xv s� ° ' / nn�+ TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 C1-2 EXISTING DEMOLITION ONDITIONS PLAN v �' I -A33"� \ \ M \\ \ m Q`� v C2-1 SITE PLAN + // C3-1 GRADING PLAN \ set /� / _ ` ;;;: \� / ?� f: C3-2 SWPPP PLAN 1 6 N N i 924��� \� / � "\ ; `: s \ : , ° o WARNING: *� I \ �� / �.,: C3-3 SWPPP NOTES N I \\\\ \ �Ysq s : \ / 3" P \ / THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL s _�z S / \ \ CON Roll-_ '' ' / C4-1 UTILITY PLAN CY) / �q23 \ sR y / li EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN 1 / \\\\ �o� ' o \ �` �� Q)v �� L/ MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES. C8-1 to C8-3 CIVIL DETAILS \ \\� .0 fah �' 9 ;o• o \ . \` _`GAS IN ET L1-1 TREE INVENTORY �� °0 9�,� `� BOX /\ PROTECTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT L2-1 LANDSCAPE PLANS r V /► I TYP-SEE DETAIL LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, L3-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS N N 1�\ / �' 1 V \ % 1 / FLOOR ELCV f \` Xy CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE Q \ /q,L2 I I I / / / =934.0 /o3e \ �. nl DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 1 f —FLOOR ELEV. ° s f •'6 ` / —0, l / I ry 1 =933.9 —ROOF ELEV. 3 3 931— Q SILT FENCE TYP-SEE DETAIL N20,3q5f �R EXISTING Sopl. O \ / CALL BOX-� 0 GP I ASS SOFT. •°' -� N o / (AS SHOWN)CNJ 0) W O • \ \ / 1 �' 0 / \ ` \ ' / A\ 5 •• —FLOOR ELM •�• .• O > / / \\\ \\\ / //� \ice /�/ \ J� / •%. •'G \ =933.8 ^ ` \ — ��� /�j� / `� \' ems, \ i—ROOF ELEV. — � _ 1 / =974.1 01 �O�i2F 9 °' /o�> aR HANDLING p0 \ 41 ` " �� — / / f -N- N I \ 1 I �f�� I A� `9 ° EOWPENT—\� A \ _FLOOR_ELEV. r..0 e,. ., .,� ` `v / �_\ L.` ■ ■ ■ ■ N 0 50 100 00 O -b o SCALE IN FEET SWPPP NOTES 1. THE NATURE OF THIS PROJECT WILL CONSIST OF CONSTRUCTING A FOUR-STORY A. FINAL STABILIZATION, PER NPDES PERMIT SECTION 13 HAS BEEN ACHIEVED ON ACRE DRAINED. THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN MUST BE C. WHEN AN INFILTRATION SYSTEM IS EXCAVATED TO FINAL GRADE (OR WITHIN APARTMENT BUILDING & THE ASSOCIATED PARKING, UTILITIES, & STORM WATER ALL PORTIONS OF THE SITE FOR WHICH THE PERMITTEE IS RESPONSIBLE. CONSTRUCTED AND MADE OPERATIONAL CONCURRENT WITH THE START OF THREE (3) FEET OF FINAL GRADE), THE PERMITTEE(S) MUST EMPLOY RIGOROUS TREATMENT AREAS . B. TRANSFER OF OWNERSHIP AS DESCRIBED IN THE PERMIT. SOIL DISTURBANCE UP GRADIENT OF THE POND. THE TEMPORARY EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS (E.G., DIVERSION BERMS) TO SEDIMENTATION BASIN SHALL BE DESIGNED TO PREVENT SHORT KEEP SEDIMENT AND RUNOFF COMPLETELY AWAY FROM THE INFILTRATION 2. THE INTENDED SEQUENCING OF MAJOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES ARE AS CIRCUITING. THE OUTFALL SHALL BE DESIGNED TO REMOVE FLOATABLE DEBRIS, AREA. THE AREA MUST BE STAKED OFF AND MARKED SO THAT HEAVY TRAINING FOLLOWS: 15. INSPECTIONS ALLOW FOR COMPLETE DRAWDOWN OF THE POND FOR MAINTENANCE CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES OR EQUIPMENT WILL NOT COMPACT THE SOIL IN A. INITIAL INSPECTION FOLLOWING SILT FENCE INSTALLATION BY CITY ACTIVITIES, AND HAVE ENERGY DISSIPATION. THE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY SHALL THE PROPOSED INFILTRATION AREA. 1. INSTALL VEHICLE TRACKING BMP BE STABILIZED. 2. INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND SITE REPRESENTATIVE IS REQUIRED. D. TO PREVENT CLOGGING OF THE INFILTRATION OR FILTRATION SYSTEM, THE FACILITY 3. INSTALL PROTECTIVE FENCE AROUND FILTRATION AREAS B. EXPOSED SOIL AREAS: ONCE EVERY 7 DAYS AND WITHIN 24 HOURS C. TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS SHALL SITUATED OUTSIDE SURFACE A PERMITTEE(S) MUST USE A PRETREATMENT DEVICE SUCH AS A VEGETATED FILTER 4. CLEAR AND GRUB SITE FOLLOWING A 0.511 OVER 24 HOUR RAIN EVENT. WATERS AND ANY REQUIRED BUFFER ZONE, AND MUST AVOID DRAINING WETLANDS, UNLESS THE IMPACT IS IN C DESIGNEDDOMPLIANCE WITH STRIP, SMALL SEDIMENTATION BASIN, OR WATER QUALITY INLET (E.G., GRIT C 5. STRIP AND STOCKPILE TOPSOIL C. STABILIZED AREAS: ONCE EVERY 30 DAYS THE REQUIREMENTS OF THIS PERMIT. CHAMBER) TO SETTLE PARTICULATES BEFORE THE STORMWATER DISCHARGES 13620 Fenway = Hugo,INTO THE INFILTRATION OF FILTRATION SYSTEM. � 6. REMOVE PAVEMENTS AND UTILITIES D. FROZEN GROUND: AS SOON AS RUNOFF OCCURS OR PRIOR TO RESUMING D. EXCESSIVE SEDIMENT-LADEN WATER THAT IS NOT PROPERLY FILTERED WILL NOT 38 7. CONSTRUCT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT BASINS 8. INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND BASINS CONSTRUCTION. BE PERMITTED TO DISCHARGE FROM SITE. 30. POST CONSTRUCTION 9. ROUGH GRADE SITE E. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE RECORDS MUST BE RETAINED FOR 3 YEARS 10. IMPORT CLEAN FILL FOR REPLACEMENT AND BALANCE AFTER FILING OF THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION AND MUST INCLUDE: DATE 25. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING THE WATER QUALITY VOLUME THAT MUST BE RETAINED ON SITE BY THE PROJECTS 11. INSTALL UTILITIES AND TIME OF ACTION, NAME OF PERSON(S) CONDUCTING WORK, FINDING OF PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM DESCRIBED IN SECTION 15 12. INSTALL BUILDING FOUNDATIONS INSPECTIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTION, DATE AND A. TURBID OR SEDIMENT-LADEN WATERS RELATED TO DEWATERING OR BASIN SHALL BE ONE (1) INCH OF RUNOFF FROM THE NEW IMPERVIOUS SURFACES CREATED 13. INSTALL CURB AND GUTTER AMOUNT OF RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN A 24 HOUR DRAINING SHALL BE DISCHARGED TO A TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT BY THE PROJECT. SEE SECTION 15. FOR MORE INFORMATION ON INFILTRATION 14. INSTALL PAVEMENTS AND WALKS PERIOD. SEDIMENTATION BASIN ON THE PROJECT SITE UNLESS INFEASIBLE. THE DESIGN, PROHIBITIONS AND APPROPRIATE SITE CONDITIONS. 15. FINAL GRADE SITE TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT BASIN MAY DISCHARGE TO SURFACE WATERS IF 16. REMOVE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT FROM BASINS THE BASIN WATER HAS BEEN VISUALLY CHECKED TO ENSURE ADEQUATE 17. CONSTRUCT FILTRATION TRENCHES 16. MINIMUM MAINTENANCE TREATMENT HAS BEEN OBTAINED IN THE BASIN AND THAT THE NUISANCE 31. RESPONSIBILITIES CONDITIONS WILL NOT RESULT FROM THE DISCHARGE. DISCHARGE POINTS A. THE OWNER MUST IDENTIFY A CONTRACTOR WHO WILL OVERSEE THE SWPPP XCELENE• GY 19.. WHEN ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY IS COMPLETE AND THE SITE IS STABILIZED, NONFUNCTIONAL, OR 1/3 FULL; WITHIN 24 HOURS 1 SEED AND MULCH A. SILT FENCE TO BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, SUPPLEMENTED WHEN SHALL BE ADEQUATELY PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND PROPER VELOCITY IMPLEMENTATION AND THE PERSON RESPONSIBLE FOR INSPECTION AND CERTIFICATION REMOVE SILT FENCE AND RESEED ANY AREAS DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL. B. SEDIMENT BASINS DRAINED AND SEDIMENT REMOVED WHEN REACHES 1/2 DISSIPATION PROVIDED. MAINTENANCE: STORAGE VOLUME. REMOVAL MUST BE COMPLETE WITHIN 72 HOURS OF B. ALL WATER FROM DEWATERING OR BASIN-DRAINING ACTIVITIES MUST BE B. THE OWNER MUST IDENTIFY THE A PERSON WHO WILL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR 3. SITE DATA: DISCOVERY. DISCHARGED IN A MANNER THAT DOES NOT CAUSE NUISANCE CONDITIONS, LONG TERM OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE OF THE PERMANENT 414 NICOLLET AREA OF DISTURBANCE: X.XX± AC EROSION IN THE RECEIVING CHANNELS OR ON DOWN SLOPE PROPERTIES, OR STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM: MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401 PRE-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: XAX AC C. SEDIMENT REMOVED FROM SURFACE WATERS WITHIN (7)SEVEN DAYS INUNDATION IN WETLANDS CAUSING SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE IMPACTS TO THE D. CONSTRUCTION SITE EXITS INSPECTED TRACKED SEDIMENT REMOVED WITH 24 WETLAND. POST-CONSTRUCTION IMPERVIOUS AREA: XAX AC HOURS. C. IF FILTERS WITH BACKWASH WATERS ARE USED, THE BACKWASH WATER SHALL 32. TRAINING REQEMENTS ■ E. PROVIDE COPIES OF EROSION INSPECTION RESULTS TO CITY ENGINEER FOR ALL BE HAULED AWAY FOR DISPOSAL, RETURNED TO THE BEGINING OF THE THE PERMITTES(S) SHALL ENSURE THE FOLLOWING INDIVIDUALS IDENTIFIED IN THIS ■■ V o I C KS GENERAL SOIL TYPE: XXX, XXX XXX EVENTS GREATER THAN Y2" IN 24 HOURS TREATMENT PROCESS, OR INCORPORATED INTO SITE IN A MANNER THAT DOES PART HAVE BEEN TRIANED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS PERMIT'S TRAINING NOT CAUSE EROSION. BACKWASH WATER MAY BE DISCHARGED TO SANITARY REQUIREMENTS. SEWER IF PERMISSION IS GRANTED BY THE SANITARY SEWER AUTHORITY. 1. WHO MUST BE TRAINED: PLANNING 4. THE LOCATION OF AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED MUST BE IDENTIFIED WITH FLAGS, 17. THE SWPPP, INCLUDING ALL CHANGES TO IT, AND INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE A. INDIVIDUAL(S) PREPARING THE SWPPP FOR THE PROJECT CIVIL ENGINEERING STAKES, SIGNS, SILT FENCE, ETC. BEFORE CONSTRUCTION BEGINS. RECORDS MUST BE KEPT AT THE SITE DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY BY THE PERMITTEE(S) WHO HAVE OPERATIONAL CONTROL OF THE SITE. 26. POLLUTION PREVENTION B. INDIVIDUAL(S) OVERSEEING IMPLEMENTATION OF, REVISING, AND/OR LAND SURVEYING 5. ALL DISTURBED GROUND LEFT INACTIVE FOR SEVEN (7) OR MORE DAYS SHALL BE A. BUILDING PRODUCTS THAT HAVE THE POTENTIAL TO LEACH POLLUTANTS AMENDING THE SWPPP AND INDIVIDUALS(S) PERFORMING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE STABILIZED BY SEEDING OR SODDING (ONLY AVAILABLE PRIOR TO SEPTEMBER 15) OR 18. OWNER MUST KEEP RECORDS OF ALL PERMITS REQUIRED FOR THE PROJECT, THE MUST BE UNDER COVER TO PREVENT DISCHARGE OR PROTECTED BY AN INSPECTIONS FOR THE PROJECT. ONE OF THESE ESTIMATED QUANTITIES ENVIRONMENTAL BY MULCHING OR COVERING OR OTHER EQUIVALENT CONTROL MEASURE. SWPPP, ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE, PERMANENT OPERATION AND EFFECTIVE MEANS DESIGNED TO MINIMIZE CONTACT WITH STORMWATER. INDIVDUAL(S) MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR AN ONSITE INSPECTION MAINTENANCE AGREEMENTS, AND REQUIRED CALCULATIONS FOR TEMPORARY AND B. PESTICIDES, HERBICIDES, INSECTICIDES, FERTILIZERS, TREATMENT CHEMICALS, WITHIN 72 HOURS UPON REQUEST BY THE MPCA. 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 AND LANDSCAPE MATERIALS MUST BE UNDER COVER. C. INDIVIDUAL(S) PERFORMING OR SUPERVISING THE INSTALLATION, DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY Maple Grove, MN 55369 PERMANENT STORM WATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS. THESE RECORDS MUST BE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR OF BMPS. AT LEAST ONE INDIVIDUAL ON A PROJECT 763.424.5505 6. ON SLOPES 3:1 OR GREATER MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR RETAINED FOR THREE YEARS AFTER FILING NPDES NOTICE OF TERMINATION. C. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND TOXIC WASTE MUST BE PROTECTED TO PREVENT MUST BE TRAINED IN THES JOB DUTIES. TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA 1 www.loucksinc.com GULLIES, SLOPE LENGTHS CAN NOT BE GREATER THAN 75 FEET. VANDALISM. NOTES SLOPES GREATER THAN 3:1. ALL 3:1 SLOPES TO BE STABILIZED WITH 19. SWPPP MUST BE AMENDED WHEN: D. SOLID WASTE MUST BE STORED, COLLECTED AND DISPOSED OF IN COMPLIANCE 2• TRAINING CONTENT: PREFABRICATED CONCRETE WASHOUT EA NOT ALLOWED, WITH MINN. R. CH 7035. THE CONTENT AND EXTENT OF TRAINING MUST BE COMMENSURATEOSION CONTROL BLANKET A. THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR WITH THE INDIVIDUAL'S JOB DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES WITH REGARD SILT FENCE (STANDARD) LF XXX WI SEASONAL CONDITIONS THAT HAS A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON DISCHARGE E. PORTABLE TOILETS MUST BE POSITIONED SO THAT THEY ARE SECURE AND WILL WI NOT BE TIPPED OR KNOCKED OVER. SANITARY WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED OF TO ACTIVITIES COVERED UNDER THIS PERMIT FOR THE PROJECT. AT LEAST EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY XXX B. INSPECTIONS INDICATE THAT THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE AND DISCHARGE IS ONE INDIVIDUAL PRESENT ON THE PERMITTED PROJECT SITE (OR INLET PROTECTION EA XXX 7. ALL STORM DRAINS AND INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED UNTIL ALL SOURCES OF EXCEEDING WATER QUALITY STANDARDS. PROPERLY IN ACCORDANCE WITH MINN. R. CH 7041. AVAVILABLE TO THE PROJECT SITE IN 72 HOURS) MUST BE TRAINED IN THE POTENTIAL DISCHARGE ARE STABILIZED. F. DISCHARGE OF SPILLED OR LEAKED CHEMICALS, INCLUDING FUEL, FROM ANY C. THE BMP'S IN THE SWPPP ARE NOT CONTROLLING POLLUTANTS IN DISCHARGES AREA WHERE CHEMICALS OR FUEL WILL BE LOADED OR UNLOADED SHALL BE JOB DUTIES DESCRIBED IN SECTION 21.213 AND SECTION 21.2C. SEEDING AC XXX OR IS NOT CONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. PREVENTED USING DRIP PANS OR ABSORBENTS. SUPPLIES SHALL BE AVAILABLE 33. THE PERMITTEE(S) SHALL ENSURE THAT THE INDIVIDUALS ARE TRAINED BY LOCAL, 8. TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL AND CAN AT ALL TIMES TO CLEANUP DISCHARGED MATERIALS AND THAT AN STATE, FEDERAL AGENCIES, PROFESSIONAL OR OTHER ENTITIES WITH EXPERTISE IN NOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS OR STORM WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS.TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SILT, CLAY, OR 20. CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA APPROPRIATE DISPOSAL METHOD MUST BE AVAILABLE FOR RECOVERED SPILLED EROSION PREVENTION, SEDIMENT CONTROL, PERMANENT STORMWATER STORMWATER POND 1 ORGANIC COMPOUNDS ARE EXEPMT EX: CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCK PILES, A. CONCRETE WASH-OUT IS NOT ALLOWED ON-SITE. MATERIALS. MANAGEMENT AND THE MINNESOTA NPDES/SDS CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES. PERMIT. AN UPDATE REFESHER-TREINING MUST BE ATTENDED EVERY THREE (3) YEARS PERMANENT POND VOLUME = XAX AF STARTING THREE (3) YEARS FROM THE ISSUANCE DATE OF THIS PERMIT. WATER QUALITY VOLUME REQUIRED = 1.011 * XAAC * 1/12 = XAX AF • • 27. DESIGN CALCULATIONS 21. IN THE EVENT OF ENCOUNTERING A WELL OR SPRING DURING CONSTRUCTION Q CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are 9. SEDIMENT LADEN WATER MUST S DISCHARGED TO A SEDIMENTATION BASIN CONTRACTOR TO CEASE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND NOTIFY ENGINEER. TEMPORARY & PERMANENT STORMWATER TREATMENT ARE DESIGNED TO MEET MPCA WATER QUALITY VOLUME PROVIDED =X.XX AF (TOTAL LIVE STORAGE) WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IF NOT POSSIBLE, IT MUST BE TREATED WITH THE APPROPRIATE ly GENERAL & SPECIAL WATER REQUIREMENTS. CALCULATIONS ARE PART OF THE 33. LIST OF CONTACTS instrumentsirespect to f the Consultant professional iless all notor used with respect to this project.These CADD files shall not be used BMP'S. HYDROLOGY REPORT, WHICH IS TO BE CONSIDERED PART OF THE SWPP on other projects,for additions to this project,or for completion he 22. PIPE OULTETS MUST BE PROVIDED WITH TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT ENERGY DOCUMENTS. SEE HYDROLOGY REPORT FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION. Consultant..With the Consultant's approval,ithout written others lmay by tbe DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER. TITLE NAME COMPANY PHONE NUMBER permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for 10. SOLID WASTE MUST BE DISPOSED OF PROPERLY AND MUST COMPLY WITH MPCA information and reference only.All intentional or unintentional DISPOSAL REQUIREMENTS. 28. GENERAL STORMWATER DISCHARGE REQUIREMENTS revisions,additions, t deletions tpart making eseCADsions,additishall ons made at the full risk of that party making such revisions,additions 23. FINAL STABILIZATION ALL REQUIREMENTS LISTED IN SECTIONS 5-7, 14 16-19 21 24 OF THE PERMIT FOR OWNER XXX XXX XXX or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the r r r Consultant from any&all responsibilities,claims,and liabilities. 11. EXTERNAL WASHING OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES MUST BE LIMITED TO A DEFINED FINAL STABILIZATION REQUIRES THAT ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACVTIVITIES HAVE BEEN DESIGN OF THE PERMANENT STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM AND DISCHARGE PROJECT MANAGER XXX LOUCKS XXX AREA OF THE SITE, RUNOFF MUST BE PROPERLY CONTAINED. COMPLETED AND THAT DISTURBED AREAS ARE STABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL HAVE BEEN INCLUDED IN THE PREPARATION OF THIS SWPP. THESE INCLUDE BUT ARE SUBMITTAUREVISIONS VEGETATIVE COVER WITH 70% OF THE EXPECTED FINAL DENSITY, AND THAT ALL NOT LIMITED TO: ENGINEER SWPPP XXX LOUCKS XXX PERMANENT PAVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. ALL TEMPORARY BMP'S SHALL BE 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL 12. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE. REMOVED, DITCHES STABILIZED, AND SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED FROM A. THE EXPECTED AMOUNT, FREQUENCY, INTENSITY, AND DURATION CONTRACTOR XXX PRECIPITATION. PERMANENT CONVEYANCES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS IN ORDER TO RETURN THE SITE MANGER POND TO DESIGN CAPACITY. B. THE NATURE OF STORMWATER RUNOFF AND RUN-ON AT THE SITE. 13. THE OWNER WHO SIGNS THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION IS A PERMITTEE AND IS C. PEAK FLOW RATES AND STORWATER VOLUMES TO MINIMIZE EROSION AT RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLIANCE WITH ALL TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF THE PERMIT. OUTLETS AND DOWNSTREAM CHANNEL AND STREAM BANK EROSION. THE OPERATOR (CONTRACTOR) WHO SIGNS THE NPDES PERMIT APPLICATION IS A 24. TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS PERMITTEE FOR ALL APPLICABLE CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY REQUIREMENTS FOUND IN A. THE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED AND MADE D. THE RANGE OF SOIL PARTICLE SIZES EXPECTED TO BE PRESENT ON THE SITE. * MPCA 24HR. HAZARDOUS SPILL HOTLINE: 651-649-5457 OF 80420798 SECTIONS 3, 4, 6-24 OF THE NPDES PERMIT AND IS JOINTLY RESPONSIBLE WITH THE OPERATIONAL PRIOR TO DISTURBANCE OF 10 OR MORE ACRES DRAINING TO A OWNER FOR COMPLIANCE WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF THE PERMIT. COMMON LOCATION. 29. CONSTRUCTION OF FILTRATION BASINS B. TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASINS ARE REQUIRED PRIOR TO RUNOFF A. NO HEAVY TRAFFIC ON FILTRATION AREAS. CONSTRUCTION TO BE DONE WITH RECEIVING WATERS 14. TERMINATION OF COVERAGE-PERMITTEE(S) WISHING TO TERMINATE COVERAGE MUST LEAVING THE CONSTRUCTION SITE OR ENTERING SURFACE WATERS WHEN 10 MINIMAL COMPACTION TO FILTRATION AREAS. IF COMPACTION IS SUBMIT A NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) TO THE MPCA. ALL PERMITTEE(S) MUST OR MORE ACRES OF DISTURBED SOILS DRAIN TO A COMMON LOCATION. THE ENCOUNTERED, BASIN SOILS FOR THE FIRST & MUST BE REMOVED & RELAID. TYPE OF TYPE OF SUBMIT A NOT WITHIN 30 DAYS AFTER ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING BASIN MUST PROVIDE 3,600 CUBIC FEET OF STORAGE BELOW THE OUTLET PER B. INFILTRATION SYSTEMS MUST NOT BE EXCAVATED TO FINAL GRADE UNTIL THE SPECIAL IMAIRED CONDITIONS HAVE BEEN MET: ACRE DRAINED. IF HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS ARE AVAILABLE, THE TEMPORARY CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREA HAD BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND FULLY NAME OF WATER BODY WATER SPECIAL SEDIMENTATION BASIN MUST PROVIDE A STORAGE VOLUME EQUIVALENT TO WATER WATER THE 2-YEAR, 24-HOUR STORM, BUT IN NO CASE LESS THAN 1800 CUBIC FEET PER STABILIZED UNLESS RIGOROUS EROSIN PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROLS BODY WATER ARE PROVIDED( SECTION 16.4). PROFESSIONAL XXX XXX XXX XXX I hereby certify that this plan,spe ation or re rt was prepared by me or under �Ire su ery that I am a duly Licensed PrAesiN41 Ea§� nder the laws of the State gtKnesota. (: CLOuth-PE Licens f`�o�� 20383 Date A)Installation PLAN DIMENSION LENGTHNGTH AND NS AS PER HE ANCHOR TRENCH QUALITY • • WIRE FENCING WIDTH TO MATCH FLAP POCKET (SEE DETAIL AND NOTES BELOW) Loucks Project No. 22012 POST SET POSTS AND STAPLE THE WIRE ®® 1 EXCAVATEA 2 MESH FENCING TO BALE DITCH CHECK ®®®®®®® 4 OVERLAP END JOINTS MINIMUM Project Lead JJD 6"X 6"TRENCH EACH POST ®®®®®®®®®®® OF 6"AND STAPLE OVERLAP AT Drawn B H W TRENCH UPSLOPE ALONG THE DEF1EC70R PLATE ® ® ® Y ®® ®® 1.5'INTERVALS. Z 6"X 6" 1 LINE OF THE POSTS ®®®®® IQ Checked By TWM IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIII IIIIhhlllll= IIIIIIIIII III IIIIIIIIIIIII01 _ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIhIIIIII= ° ° OVERFLOWQ -70P OF CURB BOX `Y O ��� Review Date 08/05/22 OVERFLOW( CEYER OF FILTER ASSEMBLY 2 IIIII=IIIII IIIII= -IIIII-ILIII= IIII= 1 2 IL -IIII -IIIII 10"F7L7ER ASSEMBLY i 0_ IIIII IIIII ° STO NMET WER QR � INDEXSHEET N FILTER FABRIC 3 ATTACH THE FILTER HE 4 BACKFILL THE TRENCH S��FFCT7 , STAGGER JOINTS C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS N IIIII WIRE IFENCC TO�INGAND EXCAVATEDSOILAND COMPACT HE OPEN THROAT CURB $" �CFFOOOF C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN (+') THE TRENCH ° V �� t BALES MINIMUM DOUBLE q„ w C2-1 SITE PLAN AROUND SIDE PIECES C3-1 GRADING PLAN y �FP I I 3 COMPACTED 1 STITCHED SEAMS ALL q �P�O 9J �\G �OpO o00 O/j��0���YM R BACKFILL AND ON FLAP POCKETS 12" OVERFLOW HOLES �--r) O IIIII=IIIII=IIIII= IIIII=IIIII=IIIII- IIIII=IIII=IIIII= IIIII=IIIII=IIIII- C3-2 SWPPP PLAN QJ0 aao� QS}p. Q FjvC/ FR IITII=_IITIIIIIIIIIIINII II�IIII�II=IIII IITiI=_II_IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITII III IIII-IIII - FRONT,BACK,AND 2„ (2"X 4" HOLE SHALL STAPLE PATTERN/DENSITY N - - - - BE HEAT CUT INTO SHALL FOLLOW C3-3 SWPPP NOTES -C .oCi.. . �7 .:p hill IIIII BALE CHECK CG 2J HIGH FL BOTTOM TO BE MADE ALL FOUR SIDE MANUFACTURERS OVERLAP LONGITUDINAL to Don. o - - C4-1 UTILITY PLAN o.. �o.. o' BOTTOM TO PROTECT STORM SEWER INLETS FROM SINGLE PIECE 7 PANELS) SPECIFICATIONS. JOINTS MINIMUM OF 6" .. o OF FABRIC FILTER BAG INSERT 3 L1-1 TREE INVENTORY 3 c {� � OF 2 O C8-1 to C8-3 CIVIL DETAILS -OI I III � .�oo �C.�{Jp oo� DRAINAGE WAY HIGH-FLOW FABRIC J III I �o 0 (CAN BE INSTALLED IN ANY INLET TYPE L2-1 LANDSCAPE PLANS OARSE U WASHED C YJ� a A� F'IEARTH O WITH OR WITHOUT A CURB BOX) 2" L3-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS i o o .y11�` QAGGREGATE ELEVATION: Q POINTS"A"SHOULD BE 0 HIGHER THAN POINT"B" FLOW FLOW ANCHOR TRENCH 1'TO 3' B)Maintenance 3„ Material: 1. DIG 6"X6"TRENCH Q 6"MIN.DEPTH 1.FILTER BARRIERS SHALL BE INSPECTED IMMEDIATELY 3.SEDIMENT DEPOSITS SHOULD BE REMOVED AFTER 1 I 1.The Road Drain-Curb&Gutter model consists of a reusable,open topped receptacle that NOTES: 2. LAY BLANKETS IN TRENCH AFTER EACH RAINFALL AND AT LEAST DAILY DURING EACH STORM EVENT.THEY MUST BE REMOVED WHEN sets inside the strom sewer rate.An incorporation rear deflector late is connected V 9 P P SEE SPECS. 2573,3137,3886&3891. 3. STAPLE AT 1.5'INTERVALS PROLONGED RAINFALL.ANY REQUIRED REPAIRS SHALL DEPOSITS REACH APPROXIMATELY 1/3 THE HEIGHT OF to the receptacle directing the water into the basin for filtration. N BE MADE IMMEDIATELY. THE BARRIER. p g MANUFACTURED ALTERNATIVES LISTED ON Mn/DOT'S APPROVED PRODUCTS LIST MAY BE SUBSTITUTED. 4. BACKFILL WITH NATURAL SOIL 6�� NOTE: OPTION 1 OPTION 2 Q 2.SHOULD THE FABRIC DECOMPOSE OR BECOME 1�. ALL GEOTEXTILE USED FOR INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MONOFILAMENT IN BOTH DIRECTIONS, AND COMPACT. (14 INEFFECTIVE PRIOR TO THE END OF THE EXPECTED 4.ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITS REMAINING PLACE E 1�RY0 2'k 2"WOOD STAKES OR STEEL REINFORCING BARS IN 2.The Road Drain-Curb&Gutter model has a replaceable filter cartridge. N NOTES: USEABLE LIFE AND THE BARRIER STILL BE NECESSARY, THE SILT FENCE OR FILTER BARRIER ISS NO LONGGERR EACH 9ALEANO EMBEDDED IN THE GROUND 10"MINIMUN. MEETING SPEC.3886. 5. BLANKET LENGTH SHALL NOT / REQUIRED SHALL BE DRESSED TO CONFORM WITH THE 3.The Filter media shall meet all locals specifications for inlet protection. O2 FINISHED SIZE,INCLUDING POCKETS WHERE REQUIRED SHALL EXTEND A MINIMUM OF 10 INCHES EXCEED 1 00'WITHOUT AN 6" N 1.CRUSHED CONCRETE NOT ALLOWED. THE FABRIC SHALL BE REPLACED PROMPTLY. EXISTING GRADE,PREPARED AND SEEDED. P P N AROUND THE PERIMETER TO FACILITATE MAINTENANCE OR REMOVAL. ANCHOR TRENCH O 2.LENGTH AND WIDTH SUBJECT TO CHANGE BY ENGINEER Maintenance: NOCK 5.WETLANDS ARE TO BE PROTECTED BY TWO ROWS OF 3� INSTALLATION NOTES: 3.FABRIC REQUIRED UNDER VYTRAFRC,ORA DRIVEWAYS P 9 3.1. DO NOT INSTALL FILTER BAG INSERT IN INLETS SHALLOWER THAN 30 INCHES,MEASURED FROM H.D.SILT FENCE.DOUBLE H.D.SILT FENCE IS REQUIRED 1.Check Filter media after each rain event.Clean or replace if sediment clogs filter. LARGER THAN 24 FEET,HEAVY TRAFFIC,OR AS NOTE: AROUND WATER BODIES,STEEP SLOPES,AND HIGHLY THE BOTTOM OF THE INLET TO THE TOP OF THE GRATE. DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER. ERODIBLE solLs. 2.Remove sediment and debris from the receptacle after each rain event. SLOPE SURFACE SHALL FREE ROCKS,SOIL 3.2. THE INSTALLED BAG SHALL HAVE A MINIMUM SIDE CLEARANCE OF 3 INCHES BETWEEN THE CLUMPS,STICKS,VEHICLELE IMPRINTS,AND GRASS. INLET WALLS AND THE BAG,MEASURED AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OVERFLOW HOLES. BLANKETS SHALL HAVE GOOD SOIL CONTACT. D- 3.3. WHERE NECESSARY THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CLINCH THE BAG,USING PLASTIC ZIP TIES,TO 0 ACHIEVE THE 3 INCH SIDE CLEARANCE. 7t PLATE NO. HU-EC-1 PLATE NO. HU-EC-2 PLATE NO. HU-EC-3 PLATE NO. HU-EC-4 Ln ® FLAP POCKETS SHALL BE LARGE ENOUGH TO ACCEPT WOOD 2 INCH X 4 INCH OR USE A ROCK SOCK REVISION REVISION REVISION REVISION OR SAND BAGS IN PLACE OF THE FLAP POCKETS. NOTES N DATE APRIL2015 PLACEMENT AND DATE APRIL2015 DATE APRIL2015 WIMCO Curb & Gutter DATE APRIL2015 ■ ■ ■ HUGO ROCK CONSTRUCTION HUGO CONSTRUCTION OF A HUGO BALE CHECK DETAILS HUGO Inlet Protection LOUCKS PLATE NO. LOUCKS PLATE NO. o ENTRANCE SILT FENCE (Model CG23) ■ LOUCKS INLET PROTECTION - 3015 LOUCKS EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 3016 FILTER BAG INSERT 00 DRAWN 212016 DRAWN 2/2016 O C3m3 O 0- WARNING: UTILITY NOTES CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL v NOTE: 1. ALL SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER AND WATERMAIN UTILITIES SHALL BE FURNISHED AND EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN I� Gopher State One Call EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS INSTALLED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIFICATIONS,THE MINNESOTA PLUMBING CODE, MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES. THE LOCAL GOVERNING UNIT , AND THE STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATION OF THE CITY XCEL • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT ���� TWIN CITY AREA:651-454-0002 TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY CORNERSTONE ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), 2018 EDITION. LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES,CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES,VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE LAND SURVEYING INC., DATED 06/14/2022. 2. ALL UTILITY PIPE BEDDING SHALL BE COMPACTED SAND OR FINE GRANULAR MATERIAL. ALL TRAINING DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED COMPACTION SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CEAM SPECIFICATION AND DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. THE GEOTECHNICAL REPORT. FACILITY FES 200 C13MH 201 3. ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITIES SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE 0 INV= 924.00 (1511) E RIM= 929.50 STATE AND LOCAL JURISDICTIONS. THE CITY DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING AND BUILDING 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN INV= 924.30 (15") E INSPECTIONS DEPARTMENT AND THE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER MUST BE NOTIFIED AT LEAST 48 ; BITUMINOUS DRIVE 25 LF 15 STM BITUMINOUS DRIVE HOURS PRIOR TO ANY WORK WITHIN THE PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY OR WORK IMPACTING PUBLIC @ 1.21% INV=924.30 (15")W a �FE � UTILITIES. -x -x x FENCE -x x FENCE x x ,. . �asd �esd �esd leSd lesd leSd leSd �esd leSd lasd yes less �esd �esd �esd �BSd 4. ALL STORM SEWER , SANITARY SEWER AND WATER SERVICES SHALL TERMINATE 5' FROM THE l8S8 l8S8 l8S8 l8S8 l8S8 l8S8 l8S8 l8S8 l8S8 l8S8 lose lose lose lose-lose BUILDING FACE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. J m LATH:---- H 20J m °�,° 5. A MINIMUM OF 18 INCHES OF VERTICAL SEPARATION AND 10 FEET OF HORIZONTAL SEPARATION IS p CORNER �13 IM- 29.0 IB I- 2 5 m -- 80 -- -- REQUIRED FOR ALL UTILITES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. co �X�-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-X-x-X-X-X I INV= 924.90 (12") ET't� q" INV= 925.50 (12 ) SE / X INV=924.90 (15")W INV=925.50 (12") W 6. ALL NEW WATERMAIN AND SERVICES MUST HAVE A MINIMUM OF 7.5 FEET OF COVER. EXTRA DEPTH I - q" MAY BE REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN A MINIMUM 18" VERTICAL SEPARATION TO SANITARY OR STORM XCELENERGY / I SEWER LINES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD ADJUST WATERMAIN TO AVOID CONFLICTS WITH M m SANITARY SEWER, STORM SEWER, AND SERVICES AS REQUIRED. INSULATION OF WATER AND m C 8" SANITARY SEWER LINES SHALL BE PROVIDED WHERE 7.5 FEET MINIMUM DEPTH CAN NOT BE I (71 k I ATTAINED. / I 83 LF 15" STM 128 LF 12" STM 6" '• 8 0 F 15 @ 0 LF 1 7. ALL FIRE HYDRANTS SHALL BE LOCATED 5 FEET BEHIND BACK OF CURB OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 8" m 8. PROPOSED PIPE MATERIALS: IN a / x I I 179 LF 12" STM a WATERMAIN CL 52 DIP 6" TO 8" DIAMETER ■■ LoUCKS LIE i @ 0.50% SANITARY STORM SEWER ER UAL WALL HDPE 40 12" TO O 18"ID DIAMETER i6" DRAINTILE PLANNING 6„ AMETER G V CIVIL ENGINEERING x I 9. ALL PORTIONS OF THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM, INCLUDING CATCH BASINS, LOCATED WITHIN 10 LAND SURVEYING / % I m FEET OF THE BUILDING OR WATER SERVICE LINE MUST BE TESTED ACCORDANCE WITH MINNESOTA LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE x M m RULES PART 4715.2820 I NilI ` 00 ENVIRONMENTAL STMH 304 * I ` �. 10.ALL JOINTS AND CONNECTIONS IN THE STORM SEWER SYSTEM SHALL BE GASTIGHT OR 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 WATERTIGHT (SEE MINNESOTA RULES PART 4715.0700). APPROVED RESILIENT RUBBER JOINTS MUST FES 303 INV= 919.45 (12") E Maple Grove, MN 55369 INV= 919.00 (12") E 210 LF 12" STM INV=919.45 (12")W LA :-- ` ` - - 7" BE USED TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCHBASINS, AND OTHER 763.424.5505 10 I STRUCTURES. / X @ 0.21% 1foR F^ , m www.loucksinc.com J x X-X-X-x x .� m 11.HIGH-DENSITY POLYETHYLENE (HDPE) STORM DRAINS MUST COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES, JCB 204 PART 4715.0540: / ^ RIM= 931.( a. PIPES 4-INCH TO 10-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH AASHTO M252. / / ,� INV=926.3 b. PIPES 12-INCH TO 60-INCH IN SIZE MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM F2306. 249 LF 12" STM OCS 305 „ I @ 0 22% INV= 919.00 (12") E - " N c. ALL FITTINGS MUST COMPLY WITH ASTM D3212. INV=920.00 (12")W N POND 1 0 m J 8 j d. WATER-TIGHT JOINTS MUST BE USED AT ALL CONNECTIONS INCLUDING STRUCTURES. 00 \\ HWL=926.9 m m a �r m 12. CONTRACTOR AND MANHOLE FABRICATOR SHALL SUMP (LOWER) ALL STORM SEWER CATCH BASIN °r-° 33 LF 12" STM BTM=918.0 o CASTINGS WITHIN PAVED AREAS 0.16 FEET OR 2-INCHES BELOW THE RIM ELEVATION DEPICTED ON / I @ 0.00% I THE UTILITY PLAN. # 13.ALL STREET REPAIRS AND PATCHING SHALL BE PERFORMED PER THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CITY. �a FES 306 4 •� J J ALL TRAFFIC CONTROL SHALL BE PROVIDED BY THE CONTRACTOR AND SHALL BE ESTABLISHED PERQUALIFICATION INV-919.00 (12")W I gg m m a THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL OF UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are ly FFE=933.0 ,� m _ (MMUTCD) AND THE CITY. THIS SHALL INCLUDE ALL SIGNAGE, BARRICADES, FLASHERS AND instrumentsirespect to f the Consultant professional iless all notor used with respect to this project.These CADD files shall not be used / FLAGGERS AS NEEDED. ALL PUBLIC STREETS SHALL BE OPEN TO TRAFFIC AT ALL TIMES. NO ROAD on other projects,for additions to this project,or for completion ce CLOSURES SHALL BE PERMITTED WITHOUT THE EXPRESSED AUTHORITY OF OF THE CITY. of this project by others without written approval by the 6" DRAINTILE I O Consultant.With the Consultant's approval,others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT PER I m 7 information and reference only.All intentional or unintentional �a `\ ='PLAT OF ROY MOLITOR SECOND ADDITION I „ ` 1 4.THE CITY SHALL OPERATE ALL GATE VALVES. revisions,additions,or deletions to these CADD files shall be 8 COMBINED SERVICE made at the full risk of that party making such revisions,additions POND 2 / CONFIRM SIZE AND LOCATION � m 8" or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the cn > 15.CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING MANHOLES SHALL BE MADE BY CORE DRILLING THE MANHOLE AT THE Consultant from any&all responsibilities,claims,and liabilities. I NWL=919.0 I WITH MECHANICAL ENGINEER a HWL-920.6 / J PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATIONS AND INSTALLING A RUBBER BOOT. GROUT IN THE BOOT AND AN I BTM=914.0 � � J q" m INVERT FOR THE NEW SEWER LINE. SUBMITTAUREVISIONS 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL 8 SAN SERVICE / 8"GV - s Q 16.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ON THE PLAN INCLUDE THE APRON SECTION. * 0 I W INVERT=927.41 z '- W / / CONFIRM SIZE AND LOCATION °�,° m g z 17.WATERMAIN PIPE SHALL BE DIP CLASS 52, INSTALLED WITH 7.5 FEET OF COVER TO TOP PIPE. I / WITH MECHANICAL ENGINEER C W FITTINGS SHALL BE COMPACT TYPE. PIPE AND FITTINGS SHALL HAVE A CEMENT MORTAR LINING. t X 8 TEE U_ CONDUCTIVITY SHALL BE PROVIDED BY WELDED STRAPS ACROSS EACH JOINT I / / CB 108 18.TRENCH COMPACTION SHALL BE 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY IN THE AREA FROM THE PIPE v 8 RIM= 930.30 ZONE TO WITHIN 3 FEET OF FINISHED GRADE AND 100% IN FINAL 3 FEET OF THE BACKFILL TO INV=927.00 (' FINISH GRADE. 77 r FES 100 FES 302 I / INV= 924.00 (183") SE FT m m INV=916.00 (12") S 78 LF 18" STM LEGEND / @ 1.27% , y EXISTING PROPOSED S" �® CATCH BASIN •■ 00) N / O ' �� ' �O STORM MANHOLE Q SIGNATUREPROFESSIONAL 88 LF 12 PVC co m I hereby certify that this Ian,s e i at' or re rt was ° r- O + m cn 7" > FLARED END SECTION y fi p p SAN @ 0.00/o I / � 0- 6 prepared by me or under re s ery l that T r + J + 238 LF 12" STM � m� SANITARY MANHOLE 1 am a duly Licensed Prom ssi I Ea§ nder the O \ ' @ 0,50% 1% Sr ya HYDRANT { laws of the State o f inesota�(� ` OCS 301 I P r GM GATE VALVE �vJ RIM=920.0 ,� MH 1 `v INV= 916.00 12" N m � + \ �. - 80 - -� ( ) I ." MH 102 RIM=931.50 HYD POST INDICATOR VALVE °P" Licens I`�o�� `�°Uth PE 20383 t GAS - m 6" G V WATER MANHOLE/WELL Date INV=919.00 (12 ) SW / = 929.00 SEE DETAIL tia + GM\ INV= 9 5.00 (15") SE 43 LF 15" STM } INV=925.36± m � LIGHT POLE � j PLAT OF ROPY narcoR Esecan AMMON � `"+ G� P r + ' � INV=9 5.00 (18") NW @ 0.40% I ,WATER g�(� Q1 POWER POLE !� QUALITY CONTROL 19 LF 12" PVC I I + °, �T'P ° GM \ / - n.a m + EX.SMH PER PLAN d I I j>DRANAGE AND UTILITY EASE NT n m• + / , aIM=g33.z �, wM=g32.7 W OE ELECTRIC METER Loucks Project No. 22012 SAN @ 2.6 1��o PLAT OF ROY MOLITOR A ION NV=427,5 DRAINAGE AND UTLITY EASEMENT i..+ NV=9�" RA GE AND UTILITY - ( I 1 moh T OF ROY Mao N DDN © GAS METER Project Lead JJD � CBMH 103 ' ' CONSTRUCT MANHOLE less Imo-- + - OVER EX. PVC STUB I EX'`� ❑O TELEPHONE PEDESTAL Drawn By HW z W LATH j RIM=g3I.I RIM= 929.00 m J M=g3os J SIGN Checked By TWM °r° / IOIXIG ' ® : INV= 925.17 (15") S 60 LF 15" STM INV=925.36± m m Review Date 08/05/22 lose lose & -- INV=925.17 (15") N� @ 0.40% - \ _ ' a X= -0eM BENCHMARK I -9SHEETINDEX 2I.7 •G / r RIM=g31.3 / / m + \6 ' NG. cn. o / X SMH SOIL BORING �B- _JFES 300 EX_F ET fr , i :, , / GATE o : f,: , lNv=g25.2e�Pvc 2 PARKING STALL COUNT C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS F INV Ig EX.FES t\ / CONTROLS- CBMH 1 04 / 1 STM LI Y EA �' 918.50 (12") NIL M-glq.8 C°151 / o° RIM= 930.00 ' \+ ° > > ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN U __ _-- .- F ` �� Ex.CB ° s3 i INV= 925.41 (15") SE `< 5 m �, / >> STORM SEWER C2-1 SITE PLAN a - _ - =glg.2� + M�zge P i 41 LF 15" STM - m`� ILL C3-1 GRADING PLAN ,�+ ' � / INV=925.41 (15 ) NW � 2 » ar- DRAINTILE » aT- S"Mmp -' �, / @ 0.6 /° > SANITARY SEWER C3-2 SWPPP PLAN INV=gl9 Nw ° FORCEMAIN Fy C3-3 SWPPP NOTES s I / INV=922.0(NE) " FM No C4-1 UTILITY PLAN I ' s / �• 6 a � I / ; �2�?�� s ' �;'.• / 3" GATE :'•�Q �•j � � I WATERMAIN I C8-1 to C8-3 CIVIL DETAILS �l • I % SSR�SR \ •, /� ° CONTROLS-- � ` �v \ / s SANITARY SEWER SERVICE -/-/- L1-1 TREE INVENTORY 1 \\ ��h. + 9 ° CBMH 105 .� Q� w WATER SERVICE -I- I L2-1 LANDSCAPE PLANS ( e dt- `� \ / ,�` 'o•'_'• 0, RIM= 930.00 CALL �, v I / o o `� BOX / L3-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS I ELE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ELE Q r 1 ;o ti > INV= 925.57 (15 ) SE Q \ Ge"`Sci<4 / / PLO ELEv.� �� ` INV=925.57 (15") NW e / # Fo p `' =g34.o /owe :.o . eix� �. / CAS UNDERGROUNDNDERGROUND GAS GAS GAS )f�!•1�h( \ EX.FES i i 3 ` try Q 4 �/ INv�i20.q\( / f + �--FLOOR ELEv. o * ` ••, °� ��, / TEL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE TEL N W 'CKWK,Y✓1' 2 \ \ i \�rL' i =`�3'g 3• CBMH 106 `° / off OVERHEAD UTILITY off o \ \\ \ `-ROOF LEV.q.q , RIM= 930.00 CBMH 107 / -x x- FENCE -X�t- N INV= 925.81 (12") SE RIM= 930.30 EXISTING BULDNG T -0-0- CHAIN LINK FENCE cN.1 \ \\ / CALL BOX-- o GP zo,3g5 SOFT. INV= 925.81 (12 ) NE p . INV=926.30 (12 ) NW o \\ ` \\ °° \ _ cAs sHowN) INV=925.81 0 5") NW X CONCRETE CURB > \ `c \ / ,�yPc'� ° ° a? c�„ /// -��- ,•� RIM o.l 5� RETAINING WALL > \ \ / 9�` •p 6 I INV \\ � \\ /// ///�i-' \\ -�P 9 ,'.GP ,, I\FLOOR ELEV. ^ ` .\ O wn Q2gHl N. •� a ' ° CONCRETE ` / ` 4 0 '� \ / J O _N_ NO PARKING �i-----��\� \\ \ ---' i'/ `� �r'`w"' /i-R74.IELEV. 0 �\ •;•1.. / BUILDING N // \\ //. \\ I/ s 1 Ex.9�3I.00D��i/�/ o / �\��\ wn g�3o.I � ,' / � CONTOUR �912�� o 1 j T MET P �Ci' °° /o o `� Nv�23.s " �`1P Xsvz 5 SPOT ELEVATION X972.5 UTILITY PLAN N PROTECTION �� "� AIR HANDLNG ry0 `� `� �1 1.O% N/�, EouIPMENI-\ 0 50 100 a �`.i 1Ox DIRECTION OF FLOW E l ,.'/ � /l W~ D F `._FLOOR ELEV. ` [,` / / o � NO TRESSPASS � o /I- ,,.. ., •• FT =g34.0 EXISTNG BOLDING `off'. .� ,� TREE LINE C) PARKING SETBACK LINE PSBL C4ml SCALE IN FEET BUILDING SETBACK LINE �SBL 0 CL r 31 4"OR 6"PVC SCHEDULE 40 BITUMINOUS SURFACE 224" XCEL • PIPE SHALL BE COMPLETELY "I INSTALL EXTERNAL MANHOLE ENTRENCHED AND SHALL -3-1/2" CHMNEY SEAL MANUFACTURED BY INFISHIELD OR APPROVED EQUAL. HAVE CLASS"B"BEDDING WHERE DIRECTED BY THE STANDARD NEENAH R-1642-8 A 3 q FACILITY ENGINEER O MANHOLE FRAME AND COVER 8'WIDE X 6"THICK LESS THAN 6' WITH TWO CONCEALED o \ POLYETHYLENE(PE)MANHOLE PICK SLOTS _w ADJUSTING RINGS O O - MN ALL MANHOLES WITH GRASSY AREA • ADJUSTING RINGS INSIDE DROP SECTION :"•27"DIA M1N 4"-MAX 12" TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER \ 6,: Blvd ; SHALL BE 5'DIA(I.D.) TOP OF SEWER IS 14'OR LESS FERNCO ADAPTER UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPE PLAN PLAN OR APPROVED EQUAL *LE MANHOLE SECTION TO BE FOR DISSIMILAR ASTM C-478 CLASS II PIPES 8'WIDE X 4"THICK 4"OR 6"PVC AN 5' SCHEDULE40 CENTER STRUCTURE CENTERSTRUCTURE TO BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB d: VVY CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB48"DIA < ELEV TO BE BOX NEENAH NO.E AND WITH FLOW LINE SHALL BE MIN.0.7' BOX NEENAH NO.E ANDA WITFLOW LINE SHALL BE MIN.0.7' VANE GRATE. 12"�.( BELOW TOP OF CURB. VANE GRATE. 12" _f BELOW TOP OF CURB. SET BY THE I IIIUSE R-2 JOINT FOR INSTALL EXTERNAL MANHOLE INSTALL EXTERNAL MANHOLE ALL MANHOLE JOINTS O ENGINEER CHIMNEY LDO MANUFACTURED L. CHIMNEY SEAL APROO ED EQU L.INFISHIELD OR APPROVED EQUAL. INFISHIELD OR APPROVED EQUAL.PIPE SHALL BEUNDERGROUND UT POLYETHYLENE(PE)ADJUSTING RINGS POLYETHYLENE(PE)ADJUSTING RINGS COMPLETELY MIN 4"-MAX 12" MIN 4"-MAX 12" STYROFOAM HI-35 BRAND XCELENE. PLASTIC FOAM OR APPROVED 24" n.? 24" ' w 'CRE-SEAL";'RESEAL",OR I� g: ENTRENCHED APPROVED EQUAL PRECAST AND SHALL HAVE ?'i'' w GASKET CONNECTION SHALL 8 PVC WY E CLASS"B"BEDDING EQUAL :;R":. ,,N. BE USED FOR CONNECTION STEPS AT WHERE DIRECTED 5" Ax}� > 5" t`:i� > PIPE TO MANHOLE 16"OC LU BY THE ENGINEER Q a JOINT DETAIL 6"PRECAST OR 6"PRECAST OR PRECAST BOTTOM SECTION SECTION A-A 8"POURED BASE SECTION A-A 8"POURED BASE WITH INVERT 6"MIN NOTES: TYPICAL SERVICE WHERE COVER OVER . . , 01 1.ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS INCLUDING NECESSARY VOIDS FILLED WITH CONCRETE VOIDS FILLED WITH CONCRETE BENDS AND SPECIAL FITTINGS SHALL BE PAID FOR AT TOP OF SEWER IS 14'OR MORE BRICK OR BLOCK ONLY BRICK OR BLOCK ONLY #5 AT 12"OC EACH WAY VARIABLE THE CONTRACT UNIT PRICE BID PER LINEAR FOOT OF 4" OR 6".NO ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION SHALL BE ALLOWED NOTES: NOTES: ■ FOR CONCRETE ENCASEMENT OR PIPE BEDDING. 1.REINFORCING 70 CONSIST OF#4 BARS @ 8"O.C.BOTH WAYS 1.REINFORCING TO CONSIST OF#4 BARS @ 8"O.C.BOTH WAYS 2.ALL SERVICE CONNECTIONS SHALL TERMINATE �` 2.GROUT BOTTOM TO DRAIN TO CENTER 2.GROUT BOTTOM TO DRAIN TO CENTER NOTES: 3.PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED 3.PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED AT THE PROPERTY LINE OR AS SPECIFIED 4.ADJUSTING RINGS SHALL HAVE MORTAR JOINTS-PLASTER OUTSIDE,STRIKE CLEAN INSIDE 4.ADJUSTING RINGS SHALL HAVE MORTAR JOINTS-PLASTER OUTSIDE,STRIKE CLEAN INSIDE 1.MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST IRON OR MA MODEL PS-I-PF 3.SERVICE STUB SHALL BE PLUGGED AND MARKED 5.WIMCO OR APPROVED EQUAL INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND KEPT IN GOOD SHAPE 5.WIMCO OR APPROVED EQUAL INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND KEPT IN GOOD SHAPE ■■ LoUCKS (BY MA INDUSTRIAL INC.)CONFORMING TO ALL OSHA REGULATIONS WITH A 4"X 4"TIMBER PROTRUDING 3'OUT NOTE: 4" UNTIL WEAR COURSE IS PAVED UNTIL WEAR COURSE IS PAVED AND SPACED 16"OC.LOCATE ON DOWNSTREAM SIDE OF GROUND PAINTED GREEN. UNDERGROUND UTILITY PIPE CROSSING 8'X 8'X 4"THICK 6.DRAIN TILE TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS 6.DRAIN TILE TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS OF MANHOLE 4.CONSTRUCT 4"PVC SERVICES FOR RESIDENTIAL CENTERED OVER PIPE 2.WHEN MANHOLE JOINTS OCCUR BELOW THE WATER TABLE THEY AND 6"PVC SERVICES FOR COMMERCIAL LOTS PLANNING NO SCALE NO SCALE SHALL BE SEAL WRAPPED AS DESCRIBED IN THE SPECIFICATION 5.WHERE SIDEWALK OR TRAILS ARE PLACED V FROM RIGHT OF WAY (INCIDENTAL). SANITARY SEWER SERVICES SHALL BE EXTENDED 10'BEYOND RIGHT OF WAY CIVIL ENGINEERING HU-SS-4 HU-SS-5 HU-STM-3A HU-STM-3B LAND SURVEYING PLATE N0. HU-SS-1 �+ PLATE N0. PLATE N0. PLATE N0. PLATE N0. LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE STANDARD MANHOLE REVISION REVISION REVISION STANDARD REVISION STANDARD REVISION 48'IINSIDE DIAMETER DATE : APRIL2015 HUGO SANITARY SEWER DATE : APRIL2015 HUGO INSULATION DETAIL DATE : APRIL2015 HUGO DATE : APRIL2015 DATE : APRIL2015 ENVIRONMENTAL HUGO ( ) TYPICAL SERVICE (411 OR 6") CATCH BASIN HUGO CATCH BASINSANITARY SEWER WITHOUT SUMP WITHOUT SUMP 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS TO BE NEENAH R-3250 LP ALL CATCH BASIN CASTINGS TO BE NEENAH R-3250 LP (SEE LOW PROFILE CASTINGS IN SPECIFICATION) 31" 31" (SEE LOW PROFILE CASTINGS IN SPECIFICATION) 31" 24" 24. 24" RCP AT OUTLETS TABLE OF QUANTIES / RIPRAP AT RCP OUTLETS RIPRAP CLASS III CLASS IV CLASSY D5ff 9' D5 T D5315" Tot O DIA 15' 7.5" 18' 9' 24" 12" AV t t A A ROUND DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH PIPE RIPRAP GRANULAR RIPRAP GRANULAR RIPRAP GRANULAR FILTER FILTER FILTER 12 2S 1.1 4.4 2.2 ES 1.7 15 2A !A 3.5 1.7 4A 2.3 GRANULAR FILTER BLANKET 2 O 1.O 21 4S 1.6 4.4 2A 7.4 3.7 24 d.8 2.9 5.9 2.6 9.2 4.] za 5.e 2.e ss 3s e.z as SECTION B-B 27 fi.9 3A 8.3 4.1 11.0 5.5 30 8.3 4.1 9.9 5.0 13.2 6.6 I B 36 11.0 5.5 13.2 SA 17.6 S. 42 13A 6S 164 8.2 21.8 10.9 CENTER STRUCTURE CENTER STRUCTURE CENTER STRUCTURE 46 19.8 a4 2oe 11.9 31.6 13.4 4 54 19.8 9.9 23.7 1L9 31.6 15.8 1O uf�1 TO BACK OF CURB. PLAN TO BACK OF CURB. PLAN TO BACK OF CURB. PLAN 60 za.o 1t.s 27S 13S ..6 18.4 U- PLAN 66 0 3.5 32.4 162 43.2 216 2' CADD QUALIFICATION CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB 72 3,.t ,s.s 37A 16.7 a S z DIA. t '84 40.0 20.0 48 0 24.0 64.0 32.0BOX NEENAH NO.R-3250A WITH BOX NEENAH NO.R-3250-A WITH BOX NEENAH NO.R-3250-LP WITH OR SPAN VANE GRATE. VANEGRATE. VANE GRATE. 90 as.5 2z.6 546 z7,3 72S 36a q A CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are INSTALL EXTERNAL MANHOLE 12• INSTALL EXTERNAL MANHOLE i2^-.I INSTALL EXTERNAL MANHOLE 12•CHIMNEY SEAL MANUFACTURED BYFLOW LINE SHALL BE MIN.O.T CHIMNEY SEAL MANUFACTURED BY I FLOW LINE SHALL BE MIN.0.7' CHIMNEY SEAL MANUFACTURED BV FLOW LINE SHALL BE MIN.O.T L instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely BELOW TOP OF CURB I BELOW TOP OF CURB BELOW TOP OF CURB RIPRAP AT RCP-A OR BOXES OF EQUIVALENT SPAN WIDTH INFISHIELD OR APPROVED EQUAL. INFISHIELD OR APPROVED EQUAL. INFISHIELD OR APPROVED EQUAL with respect to this project.These CADD files shall not be used CENTER STRUCTURE cLAsS nl CLASS Iv anssv MANHOLE H 27"DAO BE CRETEX 22nMANHOLE WITH U D CRETEX MANHOLE H 27"R U D CRETEX 1 on other projects,for additions to this project,or for completion TO BACK OF CURB POLYETHYLENE(PE) 4"- RINGS TYPE II WITH 27"ROUND OPENING POLYETHYLENE(PE) 4I MAX2" D559• D5$1z^ D 15" P 1 P 1 P POLYETHYLENE(PE)ADJUSTING RINGS TYPE II WITH 2T DIA ( TYPE II WITH 2T ROUND OPENING ,5^ z5' fe" 9" za• ,z•' of this project by others without written approval by the CURB INLET FRAME AND CURB MIN 4"-MAX 12" ROUND OPENING MIN 4"-MAX 12" MIN 4"-MAX 12'• SPAN 1n TY�yR�Q BOX NEENAH NO.R-3250 LP WITH BELOW O OFCU EMIN.0.7' BOUND DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH DEPTH 2'J "-W: Consultant.With the Consultant's approval,others may be • BELOW TOP OF CURB. .....:,.......:,......:..:..:..::.:........:..:...................... .:,:';:c;,:;.:;.A.!•;,:;.:,A. ,;.:: A,:;.:;:,A,:;.:;.:, ._.....:.:..:,..,.::....:,.:..:..::.:,.......:..:...........::.:..._.._. PIPE RIPRAP GRANULAR RIPRAP GRANULAR RIPRAP GRANULAR VANE GRATE. �«t2 �:R '% '%�'%� 'x.'t�a�%,1,s LA .,LA X �."A A LA.1 'h:%�%% '%.'%. .¢1>OX� a'%.'%..a�%,1,s FILTER FILTER FILTER 1 0 permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for INSTALL EXTERNAL MANHOLE : : : 4 , CHIMNEY SEAL MANUFACTURED BY CONCRETE CATCH BASIN ;s;. §"s N CONCRETE CATCH BASIN II I •aA w CONCRETE CATCH BASIN s I §"s N zz 3.6 L. 4.a 2.2 s.a 2.9 information and reference only.All intentional or unintentional WALL AND BASE TO BE �24"-.{ w VOIDS FILLED WITH CONCRETE WALL AND BASE TO BE N-24"-.( w VOIDS FILLED WITH CONCRETE WALL AND BASE TO BE �24"-.{ w VOIDS FILLED WITH CONCRETE 28 5S 2.9 6.s a.s s.z a.s �B revisions,additions,or deletions to these CADD files shall be INFISHIELD OR APPROVED EQUAL. "s: i;F• r[ ,K i'F• CRETEX TYPE 433B OR ;�4}. S:'3 ¢ BRICK OR BLOCK ONLY. CRETEX TYPE 433E OR _ ¢ BRICK OR BLOCK ONLY. CRETEX TYPE 433B OR "&}. S"3 ¢ BRICK OR BLOCK ONLY. 3s 6.t 4.t s.6 a.e 13.0 5.s SD @ > y M/ > r?• > 43 1.0 1. 13.2 SA 17.6 SS I made at the full risk of that party making such revisions,additions POLYETHYLENE(PE)ADJUSTING RINGS APPROVED EQUIVALENT. 48"-72• APPROVED EQUIVALENT. ix:. 4g"_7p�� .�:A APPROVED EQUIVALENT. qg^_72^ 51 13S 6S 16.4 e.z 21B 1- MIN 4"-MAX 12" s6 16.5 6.3 ISS s.s 26.4 13.2 PLAN or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the ?;'i %;; T B5 19.8 9.9 23.7 11.9 3116 15.8 Consultant from any&all responsibilities,claims,and liabilities. 73 23.3 11.6 y. 24" 38.9 197 312 18.6 N 88 32.6 16.2 38.9 19.4 51.8 ..9 _ 102 43.5 21.8 52.2 26.1 69.8 34.8 5" %;•%., ¢ a .R M1..O:...,.�.�. r..:.,:::: :::.:::': •:.:.:::.:::::..:.:2•. .. 122 44.3 22.0 528 26A ]0.4 35.2 2. RIPRAP SUBMITTAUREVISIONS L.L. > 'eA'.i':.Y:`A::A::Aiv'l{'Y'..�l:iA 'X::A:A::5x':�.4,:A:v.:'fl.` :;�;.:.Xy{!::{;:Aiv;•{!'8'.'4:�A "S:rvA:rA::"i:nL�A:i'd:y"A" . .:!'. ": ....d.........:........:�^......�-........... 122 49.3 24.8 59.1 29.8 78.8 39.4 I I 1 0 O 138 61.3 30.6 73.5 3fi.8 W. 49.0 1 GROU GROUT GROU tit 6"POUREDRECAS AS 6"POURED AS 6"POURED AS to ]4.a 37.z 89.3 ans nss 59.5 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL SECTION A-A 8"POURED BASE SECTION A-A 8"POURED BASE SECTION A-A 8"POURED BASE fir' x'.- . '''��,;'•]']'������'•' NOTE:REQUIREMENTS FOR RIPRAP SIZE,THICKNESS,AND FILTER BLANKET WILL BE DESIGNATED IN PLANS. 6"PRECAST OR SECTION A-A 8"POURED BASE GRANULAR FILTER BLANKET 2 O VOIDS FILLED WITH CONCRETE SECTION A-A BRICK OR BLOCK ONLY OFOR PIPES GREATER THAN OR EQUAL TO 48",USE 2.0' ©THE CONTRACTOR,AT HIS OPTION,MAY SUBSTITUTE A NOTES: NOTES: NOTES: GEOTEXTILE FABRIC,SPEC 3601 FOR THE GRANULAR NOTES: 1.REINFORCING TO CONSIST OF#4 BARS @ 8"O.C.BOTH WAYS 1.REINFORCING TO CONSIST OF#4 BARS @ 8"O.C.BOTH WAYS 1.REINFORCING TO CONSIST OF#4 BARS @ 8"O.C.BOTH WAYS FILTER BLANKET UNLESS OTHERWISE SPECIFIED IN THE 1.REINFORCING TO CONSIST OF#4 BARS @ 8"O.C.BOTH WAYS 2.MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST ALUMINUM OR MA INDUSTRY WITH VINYL COATING OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT AND 2.MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST ALUMINUM OR MA INDUSTRY WITH VINYL COATING OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT AND 2.MANHOLE STEPS SHALL BE CAST ALUMINUM OR MA INDUSTRY WITH VINYL COATING OR APPROVED EQUIVALENT AND PLANS.THE FABRIC SHOULD COVER THE AREA OF THE 2.GROUT BOTTOM TO DRAIN TO CENTER SHALL BE LOCATED @ 16"O.C.PARALLEL WITH THE CURB SHALL BE LOCATED @ 16"O.C.PARALLEL WITH THE CURB SHALL BE LOCATED @ 16"O.C.PARALLEL WITH THE CURB RIPRAP AND EXTEND UNDER THE CULVERT APRON 3 FEET. 3.PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED 3.GROUT BOTTOM TO DRAIN TO CENTER 3.GROUT BOTTOM TO DRAIN TO CENTER 3.GROUT BOTTOM TO DRAIN TO CENTER 4.ADJUSTING RINGS SHALL HAVE MORTAR JOINTS-PLASTER OUTSIDE,STRIKE CLEAN INSIDE 4.PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED 4.PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED 4.PIPE CUT-OUTS TO BE LOCATED WHERE REQUIRED 5.WIMCO OR APPROVED EQUAL INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND KEPT IN GOOD SHAPE 5.ADJUSTING RINGS SHALL HAVE MORTAR JOINTS-PLASTER OUTSIDE,STRIKE CLEAN INSIDE 5.ADJUSTING RINGS SHALL HAVE MORTAR JOINTS-PLASTER OUTSIDE,STRIKE CLEAN INSIDE 5.ADJUSTING RINGS SHALL HAVE MORTAR JOINTS-PLASTER OUTSIDE,STRIKE CLEAN INSIDE UNTIL WEAR COURSE IS PAVED 6.WIMCO OR APPROVED EQUAL INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND KEPT IN GOOD SHAPE UNTILL WEAR COURSE 6.WIMCO OR APPROVED EQUAL INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND KEPT IN GOOD SHAPE UNTILL WEAR COURSE 6.WIMCO OR APPROVED EQUAL INLET PROTECTION SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND KEPT IN GOOD SHAPE UNTILL WEAR COURSE 6.DRAIN TILE TO BE INSTALLED AT ALL LOW POINT CATCH BASINS IS PAVED IS PAVED IS PAVED NO SCALE NO SCALE NO SCALE NO SCALE PLATE N0. HU-STM-3C PLATE N0. HU-STM-4A PLATE N0. HU-STM-46 PLATE N0. HU-STM-4C PLATE NO.HU-STM-6 CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN CATCH BASIN STANDARD REVISION REVISION REVISION REVISION REVISION HUGO CATCH BASIN DATE : APRIL2015 HUGO MANHOLE DATE : APRIL2015 HUGO DATE : APRIL2015 DATE : APRIL2015 HUGO HAND PLACED RIP RAP DATE : APRIL2015 MANHOLE HUGO MANHOLE STORM SEWER � �� � WITHOUT SUMP (MOD) WITHOUT SUMP WITHOUT SUMP WITHOUT SUMP (MOD) \)G) 4 CU.YDS. OUTSIDE MH WALL T 1/4"X 1"FLAT BAR �\ RIPRAP CLASS 3 � FLAT BAR=1" (ROLLED TO PROVIDE \v 4 CU.YDS. OUTSIDE MH WALL T 1/4"X 1"FLAT BAR OUTER RING) 6" Distance to CL Variable RIPRAP CLASS 3 ROLLED TO PROVIDE 1/2 r 1 FLAT BAR=1" OUTER RING) PROVIDE 4-1/2"SS ANCHOR 3"r 16 GA.GALVANIZED PROVIDE 4-1/2"SS ANCHOR BOLTS W/CLIPS < 3 1/2 rQUALITY CONTROL 4 1 STEEL STRAP Q BOLTS W/CLIPS N �` ro2 SLOPE 3/4"/FT. Mn/DOT B 618 Loucks Project No. 22012 A A A ' Project Lead JJD 6"TYP. N Drawn By HW Ln g^ Distance toCLVariable Checked By 08/05/22 W 1/2"r 3"r 1 J _ 3 1/2"r SHEETINDEX U TRANSVERSE& #5 SMOOTH BAR .•. �-SLOPE 3/4"IFT. Mn/DOT B 624 LONGITUDINAL BARS- HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED @ 4"D.C.EACH WAY cT r C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 5/8"FOR 24"APRON& GRATE IN 2 SECTIONS (PROVIDE 3-1/4" r; #5 SMOOTH BAR 'v4 7 SMALLER,3/4"FOR 27" HOT DIPPED GALVANIZED @ 4"O.C.EACH WAY PLAN PLAN OPENING) a C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN U APRON&LARGER WELD GRATE IN 2 SECTIONS (PROVIDE 3-1/4" N EACH INTERSECTION PLAN PLAN OPENING) #4 EPDXY COATED REBARS @ 4 C2-1 SITE PLAN N (1)1"EYE BOLT WITH PLAN 12"O.C.IN CENTER OF WALL. C3-1 GRADING PLAN I.L (2)WASHERS EACH DRILL AND GROUT REBAR INTO STRUCTURE WALLS AND BOTTOM FACE OF CURB C3-2 SWPPP PLAN a) Sp TO HALF OF THICKNESS. 28 r 16" qNT 4:1 MAX SLOPE C3-3 SWPPP NOTES 12"r to �?0^M 1 68"r TOP OF BITUMINUS MAT C4-1 UTILITY PLAN �� 1 //\\//\//\/\/\ 10:1 SLOPE N 1/z"� C8-1 to C8-3 CIVIL DETAILS "j' \ \ \ \ 4:1 MAX SLOPE MODIFIED 'S' DESIGN L1-1 TREE INVENTORY 60" POND OUTLET ELEV. A > 48" BASE L2-1 LANDSCAPE PLANS V TIE LAST 3 JOINTS USE POND 6" \��\�\ � Q PER JOINT FASTNERS OUTLET POND \ /\ \ 2 TIE BOLT OUTLET 10, ��\ \j POND BOTTOM M L3-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS Q 6"MIN.12"MAX. (LESS THAN 6",USE NWL ;`. NWL g^ 1/2"r 6" Distance to C[ariable 1 BAR CENTERED ON NWL :'. NWL 3"r Q ELEVATION OPENING) 1' 1' 1g J U 1' 1' TYPICAL BENCH DETAIL = / 1/2"r N .POND 6"DIAMETER ORIFICE N 9` �'a I%SLO /4"/F� ON NOTES: \ INLET .POND n Mn/DOT B 612 m • a N INLET .:4•;� ' N 1.ENTIRE TRASH GUARD ASSEMBLY TO BE HOT-DIP GALVANIZED O N AFTER FABRICATION. 8" 12" ACV 2.SIZE OF TRASH GUARD VARIABLE DEPENDENT ON SIZE OF 6"� 8" NOTES: FLARED END SECTION. ELEVATION SECTION A-A 6"A 8" 1.MINIMUM OF 3"CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE UNDER > 3.PLACE TRASH GUARDS ON APRONS 18"AND LARGER,UNLESS ALL CURB AND GUTTER OTHERWISE NOTED. ELEVATION SECTION A-A PLATE NO.HU-STM-7 PLATE NO. HU-STM-10 PLATE NO. HU-STM-10A PLATE NO. HU-STM-12 PLATE NO.HU-STR-2B Ln REVISION REVISION REVISION TYPICAL POND REVISION REVISION TRASH GUARD DATE : APRIL2015 POND OUTLET SKIMMER DATE : APRIL2015 POND OUTLET SKIMMER DATE : APRIL2015 DATE : APRIL2015 CONCRETE DATE : APRIL2015 N HUGO I I HUGO STORM SEWER HUGO STORM SEWER HUGO BENCH DETAIL HUGO CIVIL DETAILS N FOR CURB & GUTTER STORM SEWER APRONS 0 00 CD C8ml -� a✓ 0 a- Notes: DESIRED MINIMUM 1) Atl concrete match points shalt be saw cut and have expansion pad unless otherwise "HYDRAFINDER"(CANDYCANE) A OUTER LIMITS OF directed by the City Engineer OUTLET NOZZLES&THREADS:TWO 2-1/2"HOSE CONNECTION LFIRE HYDRANT LOCATOR 3'a' 3'8" CONCRETE WALK a'e"" 3•s' 2) All concrete shall have a slump Of 3' Or less, a 7-day strenght Of at least 2,000 P,S.I, and AND ONE 4-1/2"PUMPER CONNECTION. 02 02 a 28 day compresive strenght of 3,900 P.S.I. R (NATIONAL STANDARD THREADS) XCEL • / y62 X WOANKRETE62 \ / 60. X WORETE.• \ 3) All bituminous match points shall be saw cut or milled and tacked prior to patching, On ti 4.0. Is, 1a t � a'o" roads were bituminous is 3' thick or greater the tap 1.5' shall be milled a mininum of 18' 7No-T 5'B. beyond the saw cut as a match point, WATEROUSWB-67 TRAININGFACILITY SLOPE 1/4"PER FOOT TO DRAIN AS SPECIFIED BAcxoFcufte 4) Gravel and bituminous In roadway area shall be repaired to a like new condition matching ' . ' STEEL POST 5 existing thicknesses. � PAINTED BLUE FRONTFAC : OS 5) Bituminous atch work done rior to June 1st and after Se tember 30th shall be heated ��\ CAPS TO BE CHAINED z z 71 (PENTAGONNUT ON CAPS) OFCUR FAC ::::::: :':''.:: P P P /��/� / /. /� �� �� �� �� �� �� ��\ z }b ' OF CUR ::?;??:llll.' With a radiant heater to seal the edges,eieei e•lei::e iisls::i••ssstt. .: r ee 4z"(4^CUS 4'O4MIN. 6 ss;c�a81 I I ® 6) All Driveways with a grader greater then 10% must obtain City Engineer approval. wEAR TYPE 41 COURSE BITUMINOUS,41 WEA50055(PG 58-28) w STREET 6'3" (6"CURB 6'3" (6"CUR_) VALVE BOX Q_ a RBJ VAR.WIOTHCURB q7t 6" q'2"4"CURB 4'0"MIN. 6 4.2" (4"CUR�) 7) All Driveways must meet City Code for tot coverage area, o ( > AS SPECIFIED it 6"CLASS 5 AGGREGATE 100%CRUSHED AJ 8) No driveway shall be within 40' of a street end radlus unless written approval is obtained LIMESTONE QUARRY OR RECYCLED I 18"24 a AS REQUIRED AS REQUIRED d , Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, MN A from the City Engineer. EQUAL(MNDOT 3138). NEON 1' PLAN VIEW OF DIAGONAL RAMP PLAN VIEW OF PERPENDICULAR RAMP GEOTEXIILE FABRIC FOR ROOT CONTROL TO BE PLACED UNDER CLASS 5 AGGREGATE 1 � � 9) Where sidewalks / trails exists or are proposed, the driveway shall extend through the I III�I���I�I��� 1"MIN. OF BASE DIAMETER sidewalk / trail area with pedestrian curb openings placed (see standard Plate NO, HU-STR-4), GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TO BE OT CONTROL OR APPROVED EQUAL 2"MAX. \ \ \ a maximium 2% cross slope on sidewalk / trail areas crossing through driveways. vs"(o.z•) GEOTEXTILE FABRIC AMAW CURB OR NOTE: STREET CURB AND GUTTER 10) Contractor to call City Engineering Department (651) 762-6316 prior t0 construction. MnDOT 3733 TYPES 7/8"1 7/18 THE FINAL WEAR COARSE LIFT SHOULD BE PLACED UPON 90-95%COMPLETION OF ALL 5'4" (6"CURB X=4'0"REQUIRED 0.875'-1.4375" HOME CONSTRUCTION. 2'-6" 3'4" (4"CURB) ------------ ._,„ •. DOME SECTION T-6"MIN COVER • 15/8-2318" 15/16-(TYP.) BIKE PATH TYPICAL SECTION BONNETADAPTOR 1"WASHED COARSE CURB BOX WITH I'-11/4" .....:,,;,•.y':.:.'..: .. (1.625"-2.375') (0.9375") T-6, 0.02 FTJFT.MAX. © -DOME P � GRAVEL OR CRUSHED STANDPIPE AND STATIONARY ROD CONCRETE WALK o 0 0 0 0 0 o MIN. (8'-6"AT FULL EXTENSION) 0.083 FTJFT. OR FLATTER o ROCK TO 6"ABOVE WASTE 1 0.05 FTJFT.MINIMUM o o C C o 0 0 0 o LFELT RADIUS 25' H.O.C. SECTION A-A 125"-2.37 0000 L (11 518 2a.. o OPENING MIN.1/3 CY 1"CORP.STOP 15116"(TYP.) o o5/8"MIN. 5/8•MIN. BRACING (o.s375") (o.fizs") VARIES AS REQUIRED IF THE PATH OF EL'X IS OR GREATER,USE DOME SPACING R ROUND ALL FELT EXPANSION PAD PAD 0.083 FT./FT.SLOPE FOR THE FLARED SIDE.IF SLOPED 'X'IS LESS THAN 4 FT,THEN THE FLARED SIDE SLOPE 1"TYPE K COPPER INTERSECTIONS MUST NOT EXCEED 0.083 FT./FT. 4 0.5' S' o.s' ; ; 8 X13 XS MANHOLE BLOCK 9"TYPE K COPPER ....,. ....: .:.......,..:....,:. \ PRECAST TCONCRETE MAINTAIN GUTTER WITH 3 ' LIP ALONG WIDTH `�:'"� OF DRIVEWAY OPENING. BLOCK WATERMAIN XCELENERGY 8'3" 1.8'3"8"CURB a o.083 FTJFT.SLOPE 4'0"© 8"CURB 8 0.083 FT./FT.SLOPE 24' MIN. SLOPE 1/4"PER FOOT TO DRAIN SAW CUT EXISTING BITUMINOUS �\ \ ;• .,,d�a �? \ IN'CURB&0.083 FT./FT.SLOPE) (4"CURB 8,0.0.0 83 FTJFT.SLOPE) HORIZONTAL GOOSENECK\ 1�iY ELEVATION OF RAMP 18' MIN. MILLED AREA �j \ //, LOOP SHALL BE NO HIGHER NOTES: ,,,/// ��.\ .\�,\�7\ .\ \� \ ,`�Ym. r��S1tsi'•gr THAN WATERMAIN ALL STATE AND LOCAL AGENCIES ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT(ADA)STANDARD DETAIL PLATE.REFER TO / WATERMAIN / �° v tT. MIND STANDARD PLAN 5-297.250 FOR ADDITIONAL PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP LAYOUTS AND THE MNDOT LAYOUTS.THE CURB AND CURB TRANSITION ON THE RAMP WILL BE PAID FOR AS LINEAR FEET OF CONCRETE CURB OR CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER.THE RAMP AREA WILL BE PAID FOR AS CONCRETE RADIANT HEAT PATCH AREA WALK EXCLUDING THE TRUNCATED DOME AREA WHICH WILL BE PAID FOR AS TRUNCATED DOMES BY THE SQUARE FOOT.BIKE TRAILS SHALL HAVE 8"x 8"x 16" 2'DIAMETER BY 3' TRUNCATED DOMES ACROSS THE ENTIRE WIDTH OF TRAIL WHEN THE TRAIL CROSSESA ROAD.DOMES ARE NOTTO BE USED ON SIDEWALKS OR TRAILS ON ALL PATCHES PLACED PRIOR •4"CONCRETE(3A32) PRECAST CONCRETE DEEP PIT UNDER WHEN CROSSING ALLEYS OR DRIVEWAYS. TO JUNE 1st OR AFTER SEPTEMBER 30th ♦ • , 0 1/21NCH PREFORMED JOINT FILLER MATERIAL,AASHTO M 213. CODCrete BASE AS SPECIFIED HYDRANT FILLED 2 PROVIDE A CLEAR PATH OF TRAVEL 4'0•WIDE BEHIND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP. A RELATIVELY FLAT 4'X4'LANDING WILL ALLOW WHEELCHAIRS TO Varies Thickness 8" 4"FINE FILTERED AGGREGATE(MNDOT 3149)OR WITH GRAVEL FOR NOTES: O Concrete Curb&Gutter n Sidewalk I Trail Driveway Slope CLASS 5AGGREGATE 100%CRUSHED LIMESTONE ALL INSTALLATIONS. 1.CURB BOXES INSTALLED IN AREAS WHERE BOULEVARD IS TO BE CUT NAVIGATE AROUND THE PEDESTRIAN RAMP.NO SIGNALS,SIGNS,CABINETS,OR OTHER OBSTRUCTIONS ARE ALLOWED IN THE RAMP OR PATH OF TRAVEL. QUARRY OR RECYCLED EQUAL(MNDOT 3138) NOTE: AT A LATER DATE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT DEPTH REQUIRED,CURB O WHEN A MEDLAN IS NOT WIDE ENOUGH FOR TWO PEDESTRIAN RAMPS AND A 48"LANDING BETWEEN THEM,THE PEDESTRIAN CROSSING SHALL Cross Slope W he t 1.HYDRANT COATINGS DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE REPAIRED AFTER THE BASE BOX EXTENTION FOR BOXES EXCEEDING 7.5'IN LENGTH ARE TO BE BE CUT THROUGH THE MEDIAN AT STREET LEVEL. 3 present Ya"Per Foot •NOTE:W THICK SIDEWALK IS REQUIRED THROUGH DRIVEWAY AREAS. COURSE OF BITUMINOUS IS INSTALLED.PRIME AND PAINT HYDRANTS PER AWWA AND BID AT CONTRACT PRICE AND SHALL INCLUDE STACK COUPLINGS, /4 Lip 4 PLACE THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS(TRUNCATED DOMES AT THE BACK OF CURB.WHEN THE DETECTABLE WARNING SYSTEM IS MANUFACTURER'S STANDARDS. O r CONNECTIONS,ETC.. ■ MATERIAL,THE CURB SHALL BE HAND FORMED TO FILL THE GAP. 2.ALL HYDRANT LEADS SHALL BE TIED WITH 3/4"TIE RODS.TIE ROD SHALL EXTEND FROM 2.CURB BOXES LOCATED IN DRIVEWAYS OR PARKING LOTS SHALL 0 ADA REQUIRED TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE T O"MIN.INDIRECTION OF TRAVEL AND SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH(3'0'OR 10"TYP.) TEE TO VALVE AND VALVE TO HYDRANT.MEGA LUGS MAY USED N LIEU EU OF TIED RODS. OF THE CURB RAMP.THIS 2'0"T 4'0*D D WIDTH(TYPH TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL CONTRAST VISUALLY WITH THE ADJACENT WALKING UTILIZE THE FORD MINNELENT. OL S PATTERN CURB BOXES A-1 OR CITY SURFACE.THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREASHALL BEALIGHT(GRAV OR BUFF TYPICALLY)COLOR WHENTHE ADJACENTSIDEWALK ISA 3.HYDRANTS SHALL HAVEA16"BREAK OFF TRAFFIC FLANGE APPROVED EQUIVALENT. LoUCKS DARK COLOR.THE ENTIRE TRUNCATED DOME AREA SHALL BE A DARK COLOR(RED OR DARK GRAY TYPICALLY)WHEN THE ADJACENT SIDEWALK IS SIDEWALK TYPICAL SECTION 4.ALL RODS AND RETAINERS TO BE COATED WITH B ITUMASTIC. 3.CORP.STOPS SHALL BE FORD BALLCORP FB600-4 AND CURB STOPS ALIGHT GRAY CEMENT COLOR. Contraction Joint Compacted 8"Class 5 5.RED OR YELLOW"OUT OF ORDER"TAG TO BE INSTALLED ON THE PUMPER CONNECTIONS AFTER Expansion Joint P SHALL BE FORD BALL VALVE 622-444M OR CITY APPROVED EQUIVALENT. ©4'0"MIN.FOR NEW CONSRUCTION.3'0"ALLOWED TO STAY IN PLACE FOR RETROFIT PROJECTS.IN SITUATIONS WHERE THE CURB CUT WIDTH Sidewalk/Trail Crossing Aggregate Base BACKFILL EXCEEDS 4'0',THE DETECTABLE WARNINGS SHALL EXTEND THE FULL WIDTH. Street Patch Min Z.00'By Length Of Curbing4.WHERE SIDEWALK OR TRAILS ARE PLACED 1'FROM RIGHT OF WAY PLANNING O DETECTABLE WARNING(TRUNCATED DOMES)SHALL BE 2'X 2'CAST IRON(NO COLOR). Removed and Replaced Recompact Aggregate Base, Area Only 100%Crushed 6.THE INITIAL&FINAL RAISING OF VALVE BOXES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE PROJECT. WATER SERVICES SHALL BE EXTENDED 10'BEYOND THE RIGHT OF WAY. Match ExistingThickness Sawed or Preformed CIVIL ENGINEERING PLATE NO.HU-STR-3 PLATE NO.HU-STR-B-CC PLATE N0. HU-STR-10 PLATE NO. H TYPICAL . HU-W-2 U-W-1 PLATE NO LAND SURVEYING PEDESTRIAN REVISION COMMERCIAL / MULTIFAMILY REVISION BIKE PATH REVISION REVISION REVISION LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE DATE APRIL2015 SIDEWALK SECTION DATE APRIL2015 I TYPICAL DATE APRIL2015 WATER SOERVICES DATE APRIL2015 ENVIRONMENTAL HUGOHUGO DATE : APRIL2015 HUGO HUGO HYDRANT INSTALLATION HUGO R CURB RAMP DETAIL CONCRETE 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 WATERMAIN , Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 www.loucksinc.com GATE VALVE ADAPTOR: Y4 STEEL WITH PROTECTIVE COATING ' %"RUBBER GASKET INSTALLED BETWEEN GATE VALVE AND ADAPTOR. TOP VIEW VALVE BOX SETTING TO BE 1/4"-3/8"BELOW PAVEMENT �j- SIDESIDE MEW_ �� AND AT GRADE IN TURF AREAS Y��W VALVE BOX SHALL BE SET TO HAVE 6"ADJUSTMENT I UP AND DOWN FROM FINISH GRADE CADD QUALIFICATION CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are AGGREGATE AND MnDOT 3733 FINISHED GRADE instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely TYPE 3 GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 7'-6" COVER FINISHED GRADE FINISHED GRADE 4"CONCRETE WALK with respect to this project.These CADD files shall not be used LINING DRAIN PIT AND ATTACHED MIN. MN/DOT 2521 on other projects,for additions to this project,or for completion TO TOP OF VALVE BOX FOOT of this project by others without written approval by the 2"BIT.WEAR COURSE, 2"BIT.WEAR COURSE, PIECE e 6"CONCRETE MN DOT 2301 Consultant.With the Consultant's approval,others may be q• permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for 1-1/2"WASHED ROCKALL AROUND BONNETTADAPTOR MN/DOT 2360 SPWEA240B MN/DOT 2360 SPWEA240B information and reference only.All intentional a unintentional MIN.1/3 C.Y. revisions,additions,or deletions to these CADD files shall be (MIN.1 C.Y.IN IMPERVIOUS SOILS) �.as -':. S . made at the full risk of that party making such revisions,additions s' .• r or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the D.I.P. WATER MAIN F TACK COAT,MN/DOT 2357 TACK COAT,MN/DOT 2357 •' •a' Consultant from any&all responsibilities,claims,and liabilities. 2"BIT.NON-WEAR COURSE, 2"BIT.NON-WEAR COURSE, 8"COMPACTED AGGREGATE BASE CL.5 OR 2 SUBMITTAUREVISIONS MN/DOT 2360 SPNWB230B MN/DOT 2360 SPNWB230B MN/DOT 3138 5 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL TIE RODS GATE VALVE 8"X 13"X 5"MANHOLE BLOCK 6"AGG.BASE,CLASS 5 OR 2 MN/DOT 3138 6"AGG.BASE,CLASS 5 OR 2 MN/DOT 3138 APPROVED SUBGRADE 4"COMPACTED AGG.BASE CL.5 24"SELECT GRANULAR,MN/DOT 3149.D 24"SELECT GRANULAR,MN/DOT 3149.D PAVEMENT SECTION BASED ON NOTES: GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC TYPE V, GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC TYPE V, GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY DATED 1. GATE VALVES SHOULD BE USED ON 6" THROUGH 16" WATERMAIN. MN/DOT 3733.2 MN/DOT 3733.2 ,20_ 2.VALVE BOX INSERTS ARE NOT ALLOWED UNLESS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. APPROVED SUBGRADE APPROVED SUBGRADE 3.VALVE BOXES SHALL BE INSTALLED PLUMB AND SHALL ALLOW A 4"P.V.C. PIPE TO PASS ENTIRELY OVER THE GATE WAVE NUT AFTER INSTALLATION IS COMPLETE. NOTES: 4. ALL VALVES SHALL BE TIED WITH Ye THREADED TIE RODS TO THE MAIN. MEGA LUGS MAY BE USED IN LIEU OF TIE ROODS. 1. CONCRETE 6"THICK OR LESS SHALL BE REINFORCED WITH WELDED WIRE 5. THE INITIAL&FINAL RAISING OF VALVE BOXES SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL N O SCALE PAVEMENT SECTION BASED ON PAVEMENT SECTION BASED ON FABRIC OR REINFORCING BARS.CONCRETE 7"THICK OR GREATER SHALL BE TO THE PROJECT. REINFORCED PER GEOTECHNICAL RECOMMENDATIONS. GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY DATED GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY ,DATED 2. SAWED OR FORMED CONTROL JOINTS SHOULD BE INCLUDED FOR EACH PLATE NO. HU-W-3 120_ 120_ 225 SQUARE FEET OF AREA OR LESS(15 FEET BY 15 FEET). 66 3. SAW CUTS SHOULD NOT CUT THROUGH THE WELDED WIRE FABRIC OR VALVE BOX REVISION REINFORCING STEEL AND DOWELS SHOULD BE UTILIZED AT FORMED HUGO DATE : APRIL 2015 AND/OR COLD JOINTS. INSTALLATION . .• • LOUCKS PLATE NO. LOUCKS PLATE NO. LOUCKS PLATE NO. LOUCKS PLATE NO. NAL SIGNATURE STANDARD BITUMINOUS HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS CONCRETE PAVEMENT CONCRETE SIDEWALK I hereby certify that this plan,spe I ationorre�Ortwas ■ LO U C KS 2031 OEM Lo U C KS 2032 OEM Lo U C KS 2033 � Lo U C KS 2034 prepared by me or under Ire s ery that PAVEMENT SECTION PAVEMENT SECTION SECTION SECTION I am a duly License^�Protssi I Ecr§i1� nder the DRAWN 12/2016 DRAWN 12/2016 DRAWN 12/2016 DRAWN 12/2016 laws of the State \'on�,.,'\nesoQta.C TT Louth-PE License-I`�o�� 20383 Date HANDICAP SIGN/BOLLARD(TYP) (SIGN TO COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA RULES QUALITY CONTROL 1341.0502 12"x18"STANDARD HANDICAP PARKING SIGN WITH SEPARATE'VAN ACCESSIBLE' CESSI LE RO TE RESERVE PANEL.GREEN LETTERING AND BORDER Loucks Project No. 22012 PARKING ON WHITE BACKGROUND.SYMBOL OF Project Lead JJ D Z o _ ® ACCESSIBILITY SHALL BE 4"x4"AND BE QDrawn By HW W HARTE ON A DWARE PER SIGN SUPPLIER'SLUE LID.USE PAVEMENT SECTION VARIES Checked By TWM Q N TC-0 TC=O TC=O RECOMMENDATIONS. I- GL=O GL=O - GL=O CONCRETE SIDEWALK- ReVIeW Date O$�OS�22 LLI = _vAly, HC SIGNAGE PER MINNESOTA SLOPE GUTTER TO MATCH 0 y RULES 1341.0502 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW- PARKING LOT DRAINAGE WIDTH&SECTION VARY C=0 it CLASS 2 RIP RAP OVER REFER TO SITE PLAN SHEETINDEX > GL=O AS SPECIFIED GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TIP GUTTER OUT AS REQ'D U 12"x6"STANDARD'VAN ACCESSIBLE'PANEL.GREEN 1/Z"RAD. C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS FLAT CURB LETTERING AND BORDER ON 3/8"LIP C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN Op 131612 CURB B612 CURB WHITE BACKGROUND. U &GUTTER &GUTTER C2-1 SITE PLAN m FULL HEIGHT CURB ENTIRE WIDTH OF HC STALLS 2"DIA.6'LONG MIN. p p p p e C3-1 GRADING PLAN iE GALVANIZED SCHEDULE 40 +• I I STEEL PIPE. EMBED IN CONCRETE n C3-2 SWPPP PLAN Q HANDICAP SIGN(TYP) I I FILLED BOLLARD 2 AS dd c ° e a c d C3-3 SWPPP NOTES V) (SIGN To COMPLY WITH MINNESOTA SPECIE/Fp e d n 0 RULES 1341.0502 y 6"DIA.SCHEDULE 40 a C4-1 UTILITY PLAN p I I ETAILS GALVENZIED STEEL PIPE I 6'LONG MINIMUM AGG.BAST L1-1 t0 TREE CIVIL N INVENTORY B 12 cuR ACCESSIBLE ROUT I I VARIES L2-1 LANDSCAPE PLANS & UTTE I I HEAVY DUTY HDPE DOME TOP L3-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS J V CL DECORATIVE SLEEVE YELLOW IN COLOR. Q N C-0 TC=O TC=O I I AVAILABLE FROM MIN.OF 4" Q L=-O. G =0 L=0 BOLLARDSNSLEEVES.COM OR EQUAL. AGG.BASE UNDER t7 C=0 C=0 TC=O TC=O -III •'I �. III- GRADE AT PARKING SURFACE CURB(IF TOTAL -I I I I= THICKNESS OF p L=-0.5 = = = • -III •I I III-Q FLAT CURB SECTION ALLOWS) I- 8" i2 4"WIDE PAINTED LINES, III I III= U SUBGRADE. 12"COMPACTED 15"COMPACTED N o �HO.E UNDISTURBED.,�45 TRAFFIC �I I :l I• I I AGG.BASE CL.5 on1 p (AISLE TO CONTAIN THE �- DESIGNATION"NO I II I I I I II I I-I TOP OF BERM 20 APPROVED SUBGRADE O PARKING"COMPLYING -II 'I �' III- NOTES: _ 1. BOLLARDS TO BE PLACED 12"BEHIND PONDING OVERFLOW ELEVATION N WITH MSBC 1341.0502) 1 II I I' I I I-i I BACK OF CURB OR SIDEWALK(REFER AREA O AS SPECIFIED SPECIFICATION NOTES: -I I I I I= To SITE PLAN.) PROTECT SLOPE WITH RIP 1. UPON COMPLETION,CURBING SHOULD BE SPRAYED WITH A 4"WIDE PAINTED I I II I'• I I I-_I 2. MAINTAIN PLUMB UNTIL CONCRETE IS RAP&FABRIC. MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND PER MNDOT 3754. I -I I ••L•_J I I SUFFICIENTLY CURED. PAVEMENT SECTION BASED ON 2. EXPANSION JOINTS AT MAX.SPACING OF 200'. CL LINES,TRAFFIC 3. CONSTRUCT IN ACCORDANCE WITH MN DOT 2531. WHITE - III= 3. HOLD CONCRETE FOOTING BELOW GEOTECHNICAL REPORT BY ,DATED - I I GRADE OF FINISHED CONCRETE TO O 000 0 20_ _ I III CREATE FINAL PAVING PATTERN AS 0 0000 LO 18"DIA. SHOWN ON PLANS. N 8'-0" 8'-0" W-0" 9'-0" 4. SIGN CENTERED AT HEAD OF PARKING (D SPACE-MAXIMUM OF 96"FROM HEAD CIVIL DETAILS N FULL HEIGHT CURB WITH FLAT CURB AT ACCESS AISLE OF PARKING SPACE. ,It O LOUCKS PLATE NO. LOUCKS PLATE NO. LOUCKS PLATE NO. LOUCKS PLATE NO. LOUCKS PLATE NO. 00 i■ LOUCKS TYPICAL ADA PARKING 2036 �■ LOUCKS TYPICAL ADA PARKING 2038A �■ LOUCKS BASIN OVERFLOW 3010 LOUCKS FLAT CURB AND 2012 LOUCKS GRAVEL STREET SECTION CUSTOM SIGN / BOLLARD COMBO GUTTER (12") • DRAWN 12/2016 DRAWN 03/2017 DRAWN 2/2016 DRAWN 2/2016 DRAWN 08/2022 C8m2 a-• 4- O d DRAINTILE TRAINING PROVIDE%4" PLATE MPCA TYPE C 6" DRAINTILE v 6" DRAINTILE > FACILITY WITH LOCKING BIOFILTRATION MIX INV=A 10 CLASP &%" PAD A —D—NWL INLET OUTLET LOCK HOLE. 6" DRAINTILE 6" DRAINTILE55038 A A° PLUG PLUG 3 INV=G1 INV=G2 ° A dA ° A ° A TOP OF WEIR A ° ELEVATION - 927.5 IN SITU SOILS = — =1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I=1 I I— DRAINTILE A ° , <A . ORIFICE OPENING HiH2 SIZE - 6 0INVERT ELEVATION A A° G A A° 924.0 ENERGYXCEL WEIR/ORIFICE -(/ GALVANIZED GRATE 414 (SPLIT) 4"X4" OPENINGS I , • • PRECAST MANHOLE\ 4 HIGH WATER LEVEL - SECTIONS 1 (EMERGENCY OVERFLOW) ■ 927.5 48" 930.0 o OUTLET CONTROL STRUCTURE I LOUCKS TOP OF WEIR ORIFICE OPENING SIZE - 6"0 (SEE DETAIL) ELEVATION INVERT ELEVATION - 924.0 MPCA TYPE C PLANNING ,.t TOP OF WEIR BIOFILTRATION MIX CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING ELEV=F 4: D-NWL LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE E—HWL ENVIRONMENTAL 11 O - 12" MIN. — D—NWL NWL 6 DT - 1021 .0 _ _ — — _ _ �o- BENCH 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 o •, s INV. 5" DIA. ORIFICE=1 3. COMPACTED IN-SITU Maple Grove, MN 55369 12" PIPE I �. 1-6- 10'� CLAY www.loucksinc.com OUTLET a C—BOTTOM 6" i 1I PIPE OUTLET 6" NON-PERFORATED 6" PERFORATED HDPE 920.0 I INLET INV=B HDPE DRAINTILE DRAINTILE INV=A1 INVERT DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED POND & FILTRATION BENCH ELEVATION TABLE PRECAST BASE SLAB ELEVATION BOTH ON THE INSIDE AND 919.0 OUTSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. A Al B C D E F G GZ H H2 I WEIR BE REINFORCED WITH AT 922.0 921.0 920.0 918.0 924.0 926.9 927.5 922.5 922.5 264' 264' 924.4 LEAST #4 REBAR, 12" ON CENTER. CADD QUALIFICATION POND 1 LOUCKS PLATE NO. CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely LO U C KS OUTLET CONTROL 4318 with respect to this project.These CADD files shall not be used on other projects,for additions to this project,or for completion STRUCTURE - WEIR/ORIFICE of this project by others without written approval by the DRAWN 2/2016 Consultant.with the Consultant's approval,others may be permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only.All intentional or unintentional POND FILTRATION BENCH DETAIL t revisions,additions, deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions,additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the Consultant from any&all responsibilities,claims,and liabilities. SU BM ITTAUREVIS IONS 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL PROVIDE%4" PLATE WITH LOCKING CLASP &%" PAD G ° °' LOCK HOLE. ° A° A A° a ° ° A da ° ° TOP OF WEIR ELEVATION - 920.6 A A A° a ° G ORIFICE OPENING • • NAL SIGNATURE A ° A A ° n 1 hereby certify that this Ian,s e ation or re rt was ° A SIZE - 5 C� y �' p p INVERT ELEVATION prepared by me or under �e su ery that Ad I am a duly Licensed ProrfSsidTfal Ea§r nder the A A° 919.0 laws of the State onesota. (� WEIR/ORIFICE � �`-�� �.J T M:7. CLouth-PE Licensf`�o� 20383 Date QUALITY CONTROL GALVANIZED GRATE Loucks Project No. 22012 (SPLIT) 4"X4" OPENINGS Project Lead JJD to PRECAST MANHOLE\ 4 HIGH WATER LEVEL - Drawn By HW Q SECTIONS 71 (EMERGENCY OVERFLOW) Checked By TWM Review Date 08/05/22 LU 920.6 V 48" 921 .0 SHEET INDEX > TOP OF WEIR J ORIFICE OPENING SIZE - SILO v ELEVATION INVERT ELEVATION - 919.0 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS N PLAN U '�r CZ-2 DEMOLITSIOTE PLAN a a � o C3-1 GRADING PLAN a 12" PIPE I - 12" MIN. C3-2 SWPPP PLAN OUTLET I e C3-3 SWPPP NOTES to I o C4-1 UTILITY PLAN 3 •. C8-1 to C8-3 CIVIL DETAILS L1-1 TREE INVENTORY J U 919.0 6 i 12" PIPE� � L2-1 LANDSCAPE PLANS Q NORMAL INLET L3-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS Q WATER o ELEVATION ° Q PRECAST BASE SLAB INVERT DOGHOUSES SHALL BE GROUTED v ELEVATION N WEIR TO BE REINFORCED WITH AT 916.0 BOTH ON THE INSIDE AND LEAST#4 REBAR, 12" ON CENTER. OUTSIDE OF THE STRUCTURE. N N N O N POND 2 LOUCKS PLATE NO. LOUCKS OUTLET CONTROL 4318 N STRUCTURE - WEIR/ORIFICE DRAWN 2/2016 CIVIL . • N CD N O 0 C8m3 WC)a) z O d 1 Y 929\.r 83 1 \ \ \\\© w r X —q32�• 0— Sq spy O M C XCEL • TRAINING /k \k k k X X—X— —x—x—x—\ 9x30 80 -- - 179 —� x FACILITY\, I q I6 ! � All I Hugo, —931� i78 ,75 •.174 90 ��(3 IT / / \ qn�\/ I Sn / EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE \933 x 92 / / TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) XCELENERGY / • 5 x/ / I �I 30 \ ` 95 /� 934 \ a x I / 73 I I 97 / EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE * \ 71 I I 711 / 1 x TO BE SAVED (TYP.) / OWNER 1 198 \k / / / / � I I 71I \ / / / 6 169 199 k / I +172 I � � k� ■ / k x XI—X—X—X X \ I / ,q2 , 71I ■■ LoUCKS / 1681 I 02 201 V/ ( ( I �s `� � 6 � 7" PLANNING 1 / zo8 I I I \ I J I � 8 CIVIL ENGINEERING / 165 209 LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE 63 ENVIRONMENTAL I 1 I 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Maple Grove, MN 55369 505 60 4 www.loucksinc.com / \ \ / / FFE�=933.0 / I 1 VR AND UTUTY z 56 •155� / OF ROY MOIITO R 5 c/ I SII 0 I EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE \ \ / _ I > I / / +17>7 I / TO BE SAVED (TYP.) Q I � 9� \ I ADD • • � z z / CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are 6 u Ill M instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely 6 \ X \ I„L IS with respect to this project.These CADD files shall not be used 51 on other projects,for additions to this project,or for completion t 150 I \ \ \ I m / of this project by others without written approval by the w Consultant.With the Consultant's approval,others may be I / permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only.All intentional or unintentional revisions,additions,or deletions to these CADD files shall be 4 I 1 made at the full risk of that party making such revisions,additions 4 5 / I I EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE or deletions and that I I party shall hold harmless and indemnify the EXISTING EVERGREEN TREE I Consultant from any&all responsibilities,claims,and liabilities.,� I 1 TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) X223 TO BE SAVED (TYP.) •+143 6" 219 222• 142 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL I218 2 �9 � S" • ,41 I I 22 228 233 • 73 229 " 3n w 39 I N 234 II +136 6 \ / }� 226 -27 �� 3n 2 71I 0 \/ I J 1 3 14 6 I T \ ` / 23\2 2w l 8 20 \ I 217 P GM / v�35 3111 50 n 129 I i 21 �� + GAS 13 C " I "WATER MaITOR E ONDNTA RTION /�� P \ ,/ 933� \ — _ `FE'LD EDc- — 2 3 / / PER PLAN 3. 114 EXISTING DECIDUOUS TREE �93/ ` cM ' 93— I — / DRAINAGE AND UTUTY EASE N R \ \ \ , 3 — 2 3" / ' AT OF/ROY MOUTOR Ap 10 \ 'r / x\DRAINAGE MD UTILITY EASEMENT PE u 6 TO BE REMOVED (TYP.) O ; e� 93?/ ' r7/// 111\\\anT of aoY Mewr AD'I.... — — _ r of Ro Mal p� DDN F o e l AW UTUTY SE R 1 \ 924 �'\ G I J / UG > > G L Jo IPROFESSIONAL \9� �- _� \ FErvc X 9 3' " � I hereby certify that this plan,spe I ation or re rt was 22 —\l l I C # `� ——— 'I n 3 3 SP3" _ I I / 10 prepared by me or under Ire s ery that % 05 q \\\ \ 0�\ q \ / \` ° / 3 P " L •� A I I armaaddWy itktsem klands �laive _� P311UG 3 , 31I rho I IafN�ef5uhe�dtl�lro t�sota. ( / / 311 Ekdarx+Afi-IE3� 42 46 4 50 4 _ _�1 s � a �q2V J�\l ,\> \ L , o \ , r4 Licens O $0BBB z —�-� l / \ /� \ ✓ \ > 2� Date � Q / s1 - 0 1 I / �924/ \ 9 \ 9 ,' / I /_0,33 \ V \J EL eC13?� QUALITY CONTROL l l I 24 53 I / , \� � •�•- / / \ 3 , � Loucks Project No. 22012 Z83 58 5�57 gg 107 3n w oo Project Lead JJD z ---- 98g7 9692 > , q SP3" Wa V 1�Drawn By OwlAO�F� LLIw I 34 , Checked By 6 3 • 64 95 g1 90 ( \~ \ 33 g 89g ` I �I( I tv`� t(� ~ \ ` \ \\ ,,/ t� o o° \91? 6- i\ Review Date Xx/Xx/22 ' s • 66 r 1( / Y',y a 1 N 1 r\ 1 I / \> ` �� ' \ 3" / J 67 72 75 �` �p�ptUg2rl� �111 6 \\ \ SHEET INDEX -7 3n 6?Q / 32 76 1 I I �93 / / / 6 / V C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 1 OK74 86 / l l l/� �� I / I 3 �� NOTES: C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN 79 81 2 Z,r�S / i 3 \ G3I— �� C2-1 SITE PLAN N o 3 -7 / REFER TO SHEET L1-2 FOR TREE INVENTORY LIST AND TREE C3-1 GRADING PLAN 28 27l 23 d s 5 2 0 81 84 6 /J / \� / // / / \ \\ J / \ \ UT \N1 .. PRESERVATION DETAILS. C3-2 SWPPP PLAN C3-3 SWPPP NOTES I i 3 V A z , / ; W . 1i V A / ° / \V� 4n J / Q ° C4-1 UTILITY PLAN Q 54 z �`� \\ \ / /� __ "` C8-1 to C8-3 CIVIL DETAILS N / 12 \\ \ / \ `� ' ;'` R� ° / / \ / L1-1 TREE INVENTORY g - _ / / / `\ �\ ��' I \ �`6 ,. p��.;• I M / \ ( , . ... / L2-1 LANDSCAPE PLANS Q _ ,\\ 1 \\ ,.� 9� F. L3-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS g I ^ ,A1/ 70 Q I �'' \ 1 �/ I C' tip` ° / `. �� L� LL CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! ( �/ a NO tRESSPASS / \ I ��� O / o 6 I o� 7/�� Gopher State One Cal ,� \\ `� TWIN CITY AREA:651-454-0002 . ` , tiny TOLL FREE:1-800-252-1166 � - - / 4 _ _ _ CL i I I � ih I>\ PO �� N TREE WARNING: POSSIBLE WETLAND EDGE(NO PROFESSIONAI. / i / / I \ INVENTORY DELINEATION EVDENCE FOUND.)-----`�' I /��' /� � —923 ���t' �,'' /�, 11 i, E�IE Nr\ THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL ( NO T2ES PASS �' 0 AINAGE AND UtILI �R Qi24�a I I K a° / EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN N I �/ / i icr EAS�f'9fsNt PER DO ' �'.// �'�s G at ELa s \ \ V �� Q 50 100 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES. ■ J, O I /,i I /�i /,iJULv 15.2016 R� / i / v', / C141 I I NO. 3q 12440 — 9 I / , , _�� _ � �\� �� \ l • •'•¢!' \ `bra a THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT o I /6 \ ,� I 92? �' ��' ,' /� '( ,Y ��j\\\\\\�\ / • ' °c� b \��P�32 �\ � �a``� / LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, n10 Q CABLES, CONDUITS PIPES, MANHOLES,VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE O \ l\ /r l �\ t�G ,i'/ ��'' O� 0 .'' \/ � � I \\\\\\ \ \ �qNj G \ `�\ \ `� ,�� / / SCALE IN FEET DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED / III �I I// \\\ ' `\ q3�� \ DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. Ly EL v // Tree # Species DBH Condition Stems Saved/Removed Off Site Tree # Species DBH Condition Stems Saved/Removed Off Site Tree # Species DBH Condition Stems Saved/Removed Off Site 1 Ash, green 7.5 Good 1 Saved 79 Basswood 7.0 Good 1 Saved 158 Ash, green 6.5 Good 1 Removed TRAININ 2 Boxelder 9.5 Good 1 Saved 80 Ash, green 6.0 Good 1 Saved 159 Elm, American 7.0 Good 1 Removed FACILITY 3 Boxelder 6.5 Fair 1 Saved 81 Ash, black 8.0 Good 1 Saved 160 Oak, bur 32.0 Good 1 Removed 4 Basswood 25.0 Fair 4 Saved 82 Ash, green 12.5 Good 1 Saved 161 Boxelder 8.0 Good 1 Removed 13620 Fenway Blvd N, Hugo, 5 Ash, green 12.5 Good 1 Saved 83 Ash, black 6.0 Good 1 Saved 162 Cherry, black 13.0 Good 1 Removed 55038 6 Ash, green 10.5 Good 1 Saved 84 Ash, green 9.0 Good 1 Saved 163 Ash, green 7.0 Good 1 Removed 7 Ash, green 11.5 Good 1 Saved 85 Boxelder 7.5 Good 1 Saved 164 Ash, green 10.0 Good 1 Removed 8 Basswood 9.0 Good 1 Saved 86 Basswood 20.0 Good 2 Saved 165 Ash, green 9.0 Good 1 Removed 9 Basswood 8.0 Good 1 Saved 87 Boxelder 14.5 Good 1 Saved 166 Aspen 6.0 Good 1 Removed 10 Ash, green 14.0 Good 1 Saved 88 Boxelder 11.5 Good 1 Saved 167 Aspen 9.0 Good 1 Removed 11 Elm, American 11.0 Good 1 Saved 89 Boxelder 16.5 Fair 2 Saved 168 Aspen 6.0 Good 1 Removed GY 12 Ash, green 10.5 Good 1 Saved 90 Boxelder 7.0 Good 1 Saved 169 Aspen 10.0 Fair 1 Removed • 13 Ash, black 7.0 Good 1 Saved 91 Boxelder 10.0 Good 1 Saved 170 Aspen 8.0 Good 1 Removed 14 Boxelder 10.0 Fair 1 Saved 92 Boxelder 7.5 Good 1 Saved 171 Aspen 14.0 Good 1 Removed 15 Boxelder 6.0 Fair 1 Saved 93 Boxelder 8.0 Good 1 Saved 172 Aspen 25.0 Good 2 Saved OWNER ADDRESS 16 Boxelder 13.0 Good 1 Saved 94 Boxelder 8.0 Poor 1 Saved 173 Ash, green 15.5 Good 2 Removed 17 Boxelder 8.0 Fair 1 Saved 95 Ash, green 6.5 Good 1 Saved 174 Ash, green 6.5 Good 1 Removed 18 Boxelder 9.0 Fair 1 Saved 96 Ash, black 8.0 Good 1 Saved 175 Cottonwood 21.0 Good 1 Removed �� LOUCKS 19 Boxelder 6.0 Fair 1 Saved 97 Ash, green 7.0 Good 1 Saved 176 Ash, green 11.0 Good 2 Removed PLANNING 20 Boxelder 10.0 Good 1 Saved 98 Cottonwood 26.5 Good 1 Saved 177 Ash, green 10.0 Good 1 Removed CIVIL ENGINEERING 21 Boxelder 8.0 Good 1 Saved 99 Willow 13.0 Good 1 Saved 178 Boxelder 11.0 Fair 1 Removed LAND SURVEYING LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 22 Boxelder 6.0 Good 1 Saved 100 Ash, green 9.0 Good 1 Saved 179 Willow 16.0 Good 1 Removed ENVIRONMENTAL 23 Elm, American 7.0 Fair 1 Saved 101 Boxelder 10.0 Good 1 Saved 180 Boxelder 7.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 24 Boxelder 9.0 Good 1 Saved 102 Willow 28.0 Good 2 Saved 181 Boxelder 6.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site / Maple Grove, MN 55369 763.424.5505 25 Ash, green 15.5 Good 1 Saved 103 Boxelder 11.5 Good 1 Saved 182 Boxelder 12.5 Good 1 Saved Off Site w w www.loucksinc.com 26 Boxelder 10.5 Good 1 Saved 104 Willow 30.0 Good 1 Saved 183 Boxelder 7.5 Poor 1 Saved Off Site 27 Boxelder 7.0 Fair 1 Saved 105 Cottonwood 22.5 Good 1 Saved 184 Boxelder 8.0 Good 1 Removed o 0 28 Boxelder 12.5 Fair 1 Saved 106 Willow 25.0 Good 1 Saved 185 Willow 7.0 Good 1 Removed � I I LU 29 Boxelder 10.0 Poor 1 Saved 107 Ash, black 10.0 Fair 1 Saved 186 Willow 11.0 Good 1 Removed ° ° 2" x 4" WOOD STAKE, w w POSITIONED AS NOTED. 30 Cottonwood 20.0 Good 1 Saved 108 Ash, green 16.5 Good 1 Saved 187 Cottonwood 10.0 Good 1 Removed I STRING 4' HIGH, ORANGE POLYETHYLENE 31 Elm, American 7.5 Good 1 Saved 109 Boxelder 13.5 Good 1 Saved 188 Ash, green 6.0 Good 1 Removed I I LAMINAR SAFETY NETTING BETWEEN 32 Boxelder 9.0 Fair 1 Saved 110 Boxelder 10.0 Good 1 Saved 189 Ash, green 6.0 Good 1 Removed WOOD STAKES PLACED EXISTING TREE 5' ON CENTER AND 33 Boxelder 7.0 Fair 1 Saved 111 Ash, green 15.0 Good 1 Saved 190 Ash, green 9.5 Good 1 Removed I TO REMAIN I PLACED BETWEEN TREE PROTECTION AND CADD QUALIFICATION 34 Elm, American 11.5 Good 1 Saved 112 Ash, green 21.5 Fair 2 Saved Off Site 191 Ash, green 7.0 Good 1 Removed I I DISTURBED AREAS. CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are 35 Elm, American 7.0 Fair 1 Saved 113 Elm, American 13.5 Good 1 Saved Off Site 192 Ash, green 9.0 Fair 1 Removed instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely with respect to this project.These CADD files shall not be used 36 Willow 12.0 Good 1 Saved 114 Elm American 6.5 Good 1 Saved Off Site 193 Ash green 9.5 Good 1 Removed I of thisoth rojproectsbyotherswitoutwritenapprct,or completion , , of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant.With the Consultant's approval,others may be 37 Willow 15.5 Good 1 Saved 115 Ash, black 7.5 Good 1 Saved Off Site 194 Boxelder 10.0 Good 1 Removed _ permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for p I information and reference only.All intentional or unintentional 38 Elm American 9.0 Good 1 Saved 116 Elm American 10.5 Good 1 Saved Off Site 195 Boxelder 8.5 Good 1 Removed revisions,additions, t deletions tpart making eseCADsions,additishall ons , , � made at the full risk of that party making such revisions,additions or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the 39 Elm, American 12.0 Good 1 Saved 117 Ash, green 12.5 Good 1 Saved Off Site 196 Boxelder 7.5 Good 1 Removed Consultant from any&all responsibilities,claims,and liabilities. 40 Ash, black 9.5 Good 1 Saved 118 Willow 12.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 197 Boxelder 10.5 Good 1 Removed EXISTING GRADEN SUBMITTAUREVISIONS 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL 41 Ash, green 10.0 Good 1 Saved 119 Boxelder 6.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 198 Boxelder 7.0 Good 1 Removed I I I I 42 Boxelder 13.0 Fair 1 Saved 120 Boxelder 7.5 Good 1 Saved Off Site 199 Boxelder 10.0 Fair 1 Removed V V 43 Boxelder 9.0 Fair 1 Saved 121 Willow 12.5 Good 1 Saved Off Site 200 Ash, green 28.0 Fair 1 Removed 44 Ash, green 7.5 Good 1 Saved 122 Cottonwood 26.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 201 Boxelder 6.0 Good 1 Removed TREE PROTECTION NOTE: 45 Boxelder 6.5 Good 1 Saved 123 Willow 24.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 202 Boxelder 27.0 Fair 4 Removed INSTALL SNOW FENCE AROUND EACH TREE TO BE PROTECTED PRIOR TO GRADING. FENCE SHALL 46 Boxelder 10.5 Good 1 Saved 124 Ash, green 6.5 Good 1 Saved Off Site 203 Ash, green 7.5 Good 1 Removed BE PLACED AT THE DRIP EDGE OR CRITICAL ROOT ZONES OF THE TREES. FENCING SHALL BE NO CLOSER THAN 6' TO THE TRUNK OF ANY TREE TO BE PROTECTED. THE PERIMETERS FOR TREES 47 Ash, green 14.5 Poor 1 Saved 125 Cottonwood 27.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 204 Boxelder 7.0 Good 1 Removed BEING PROTECTED SHALL BE DESIGNATED AT ALL TIMES DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND 48 Ash, green 15.5 Good 1 Saved 126 Cottonwood 24.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 205 Oak, bur 6.0 Good 1 Removed SIGNAGE SHALL BE INSTALLED AT ALL TREE PROTECTION AREAS THAT INSTRUCTS WORKERS TO STAY OUT. CONTRACTOR SHALL AVOID ALL AREAS WITHIN TREE PROTECTION FENCE. SOIL 49 Boxelder 7.0 Fair 1 Saved 127 Ash, green 6.5 Good 1 Saved Off Site 206 Oak, bur 7.0 Good 1 Removed SHOULD BE PROTECTED FROM EROSION AND CHANGES IN CHEMISTRY FROM CONCRETE OR 50 Boxelder 11.5 Fair 1 Saved 129 Ash, green 6.0 Good 1 Removed 207 Boxelder 7.5 Fair 1 Removed TOXIC MATERIALS SUCH AS FUELS AND PAINTS. PROFESSIONAL SIGNATURE 51 Boxelder 14.0 Good 1 Saved 130 Cottonwood 14.5 Good 1 Saved Off Site 208 Boxelder 8.0 Fair 1 Removed THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE "TREE PAINT" ON SITE AT ALL TIMES. IF AN OAK IS WOUNDED Iherebycertifythatthisplan,spe ationorre rtwas 52 Ash, green 17.0 Good 1 Saved 131 WIIIOW 25.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 209 Ash, green 6.5 Good 1 Removed DURING CONSTRUCTION, THE CONTRACTOR MUST IMMEDIATELY APPLY PAINT TO THE WOUND IN prepared by meorunder ire su ervj6te dthat ORDER TO PREVENT OAK WILT. ALL DAMAGE TO TREES TO BE PROTECTED SHALL BE BROUGHT TO I aimaaddl�iitere�as�dlaRcbs tramlylr``rtdlerla�e laEnt�ei5ti}adil�lroQt�sota 53 Boxelder 10.0 Fair 1 Saved 132 WIIIOW 14.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 210 Boxelder 12.5 Fair 1 Removed THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. \)C\v 54 Elm, American 10.0 Good 1 Saved 133 Willow 27.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 211 Boxelder 6.5 Good 1 Removed Et�mffs_M J 55 Boxelder 7.5 Fair 1 Saved 134 Cottonwood 28.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 212 Elm, Siberian 18.0 Good 1 Removed Licens ro 20oso Q Date 0 56 Willow 17.5 Good 1 Saved 135 Willow 10.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 213 Ash, green 8.5 Good 1 Removed TREE PROTECTION �- DUCKS TREE Boxelder 7.0 Fair 1 Saved 136 Cottonwood 26.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 214 Ash, green 7.5 Good 1 Removed 0 Loucks Project No. 22012 w 58 Elm, American 7.5 Good 1 Saved 137 Ash, green 6.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 215 Ash, green 6.5 Good 1 Removed N.T.S. Tree Protection.dwg Project Lead JJD w I Drawn Ow 59 Ash, green 7.0 Good 1 Saved 138 Elm, American 10.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 216 Ash, green 9.5 Poor 1 Removed checked By > AW LU 60 Ash, black 9.0 Good 1 Saved 139 Ash, green 8.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 217 Ash, green 19.5 Fair 1 Removed Review Datexx/xx/22 17 N 61 Boxelder 9.5 Fair 1 Saved 140 Ash, green 7.0 Good 1 Saved 218 Walnut 12.5 Good 1 Removed SHEET INDEX 62 Boxelder 10.5 Fair 1 Saved 141 Cherry, black 8.5 Good 1 Saved 219 Walnut 10.0 Good 1 Removed C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 63 Elm, American 11.5 Fair 1 Saved 142 Elm, American 7.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 220 Walnut 6.5 Good 1 Removed NOTES: C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN C2-1 SITE PLAN N 64 Boxelder 10.5 Good 1 Saved 143 Cottonwood 33.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 221 Walnut 14.5 Good 1 Removed REFER TO SHEET L1-1 FOR TREE INVENTORY PLAN AND TREES THAT C3-1 GRADING PLAN 3 65 Boxelder 9.0 Fair 1 Saved 144 Cottonwood 16.5 Good 1 Saved Off Site 222 Ash, green 6.5 Good 1 Removed WILL BE REMOVED OR SAVE. C3-2 SWPPP PLAN _0I C3-3 SWPPP NOTES 66 Boxelder 10.0 Good 1 Saved 145 Ash, green 6.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 223 Ash, green 8.5 Fair 1 Removed C4-1 UTILITY PLAN CL 67 Cottonwood 30.0 Good 1 Saved 146 Cottonwood 27.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 224 Ash, green 11.5 Fair 1 Removed C8-1 to C8-3 CIVIL DETAILS o L1-1 TREE INVENTORY z 68 Ash, black 8.5 Good 1 Saved 147 Elm, American 7.5 Good 1 Saved Off Site 225 Boxelder 22.0 Poor 1 Removed L2-1 LANDSCAPE PLANS a69 Boxelder 6.0 Good 1 Saved 148 Ash, green 11.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 226 Ash, green 10.5 Poor 1 Removed L3-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS 0 70 Cottonwood 27.0 Good 1 Saved 149 Elm, American 8.5 Good 1 Saved Off Site 227 Ash, green 36.0 Good 1 Removed a71 Boxelder 7.0 Good 1 Saved 150 Elm, American 6.5 Good 1 Saved Off Site 228 Mulberry 11.0 Fair 1 Removed CALL BEFORE YOU DiG U N 72 Boxelder 10.0 Good 1 Saved 151 Cottonwood 29.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 229 Fir, balsam 9.0 Fair 1 Removed @t1JJ *1k Gopher State One Cal73 Ash black 7.0 Good 1 Saved 152 Ash, green 7.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 230 Walnut 12.5 Good 1 Removed FWINCITYAREA:651-454-0002 ' TOLL FREE:1-800-252-1166 74 Cottonwood 26.5 Good 1 Saved 153 Cottonwood 25.0 Good 1 Saved Off Site 231 Maple, silver 3.0 Fair 1 Saved 75 Ash, green 11.0 Good 1 Saved 154 Ash, green 6.0 Good 1 Saved 232 Pine, red 3.0 Good 1 Saved EE 76 Ash, black 9.5 Fair 1 Saved 155 Ash, green 6.0 Good 1 Saved 233 Pine, white 4.5 Good 1 Saved • WARNING: M 77 Ash green 8.0 Fair 1 Saved 156 Ash, green 6.0 Good 1 Saved 234 Fir, balsam 2.5 Good 1 Saved � � THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL INVENTORY N 78 Elm American 9.0 Good 1 Saved 157 Ash, green 7.0 Good 1 Removed 235 Maple, red 2.0 Fair 1 Saved EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN N ' MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES. DETAILS 0 N THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT o LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, 00 CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES, VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE o DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGEDLl m2 DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 0 a- `9? �x o \ ��\ 9\� WETLAND NO MOW GRASS F IRRIGATION LIMITS (TYP.) it i \\ � E .) ' 'J 1 \ \ ^ ��" SEED MIX (TYP SEED (TYP.)_ "— X — — — —X X FEaJbt- X X X — X — z _ GENERAL NOTES: �AN B_-(9- E CONTRACTOR SHALL VISIT SITE PRIOR TO SUBMITTING BID. HE SHALL INSPECT SITE AND BECOME FAMILIAR WITH EXISTING CONDITIONS RELATING TO THE NATURE AND SCOPE OF WORK. 3 3 0� 2 '�/ a VERIFY LAYOUT AND ANY DIMENSIONS SHOWN AND BRING TO THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT ANYTRAINING WHP -- 80 -- - i// ` ' �- -- ---- WHP WHP WHP v ��x_ \ o. , o. , —or, y , • _ 7 2 2 q" DISCREPANCIES WHICH MAY COMPROMISE THE DESIGN AND/OR INTENT OF THE PROJECTS LAYOUT. FACILITY GL SKH SKH SGM r ASSURE COMPLIANCE WITH ALL APPLICABLE CODES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE WORK OR MATERIALS � q" SUPPLIED. LANDSCAPE EDGING (TYP.) j IL % - Hugo, —93h I I r " \ CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT ALL EXISTING ROADS, CURBS/GUTTERS,TRAILS,TREES, LAWNS AND SITE ELEMENTS / 9 Itr / 8 DURING PLANTING OPERATIONS. ANY DAMAGE TO SAME SHALL BE REPAIRED AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 55038 i EXISTING TREES (TYP.) I CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALIGNMENT AND LOCATION OF ALL UNDERGROUND AND ABOVE GRADE UTILITIES. / � CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE THE NECESSARY PROTECTION FOR THE UTILITIES BEFORE CONSTRUCTION/MATERIAL I g INSTALLATION BEGINS.CONTRACTOR TO NOTIFY GENERAL CONTRACTOR OF ANY CONCERNS PRIOR TO Hill I I I I I IINSTALLATION OF PLANTINGS. o`ti� / / 933 „ /r r r EXISTING CONTOURS,TRAILS,VEGETATION, CURB/GUTTER AND OTHER EXISTING ELEMENTS BASED UPON ° I 1 • * "' INFORMATION SUPPLIED TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY OTHERS. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ANY AND ALL 3 4 2 4 I DISCREPANCIES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT OF SAME. AE AM WB WB ' • x� I i �- 934 30N THE ALIGNMENT AND GRADES OF THE PROPOSED WALKS,TRAILS AND/OR ROADWAYS ARE SUBJECT TO FIELD / // / r / / I �o Z •• //� ADJUSTMENT REQUIRED TO CONFORM TO LOCALIZED TOPOGRAPHIC CONDITIONS AND TO MINIMIZE TREE REMOVAL / AND GRADING. ANY CHANGE IN ALIGNMENT MUST BE APPROVED BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. rA V� r l / I I /// / f/ 7" REFER TO SHEET L3-1 FOR PLANTING SCHEDULE, PLANTING NOTES,AND PLANTING DETAILS. I ) •�` STONE MULCH ,� / OWNER ADDRESS (TYP.) I / / ///// SOD (TYPJ - / ///// . x --x--�x--Cc mac- x�z x---x- x _ •. � a STONE MULCH 7 00, ■■ DUCKS / Il ;��it, I. i--.I ��.� I j I� /i i i I (TYP.) �. MS�3;M �o I 1 id"/ \ „ fl,� �� 1 WETLAND o� �' � , � , �/ li �f, ,. � �� ' �' /�.�/ 25 57 711 PLANNING SEED MIX (TYP.) AC FC 8" IRRIGATION NOTES: CIVIL ENGINEERING LAND SURVEYING r f I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE � � ' � � � VERIFY EXISTING/PROPOSED IRRIGATION SYSTEM LAYOUT AND CONFIRM COMPLETE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION PRIOR TO �1 I 1', c, r , , � , ., W f ' NO MOW I SUPPLYING SHOP DRAWINGS. ENVIRONMENTAL / - I f°o ` / ' A GRASS SEED SOD (TYP.) 7200 Hemlock Lane Suite 300 TYP.) 9 I LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AN IRRIGATION LAYOUT PLAN AND SPECIFICATION ( I Maple Grove, MN 55369 �1 \ i ��L SGM I AS A PART OF THE SCOPE OF WORK WHEN BIDDING.THESE SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR I 763.424.5505 / WETLAND �� / III 11 / 29 TO ORDER AND/OR INSTALLATION. IT SHALL BE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTORS RESPONSIBILITY TO INSURE THAT / I 0% \ \ �; I ,t r www.loucksinc.com SEED MIX (TYP I r___�__� n�, I li // , SG II ALL SODDED/SEEDED AND PLANTED AREAS ARE IRRIGATED PROPERLY, INCLUDING THOSE AREAS DIRECTLY AROUND n \ r / FFE=J33.O II Z AND ABUTTING BUILDING FOUNDATION. / / !Il ��1 !I c�� • o• LANDSCAPE THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN IRRIGATION SCHEDULE APPROPRIATE TO THE I EDGING (TYP.) '� 0 PROJECT SITE CONDITIONS AND TO PLANT MATERIAL GROWTH REQUIREMENTS. �2aI����AAAACE AND unlrYEn Nr PER N I Ir 42 / �I HE SYSTEM SPRINKLE THE BUILDING. PLAT OF R MOL� C ADDIT i� j �,, / / 0 Ilfl / I I " IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS NOT TO SPRINKLE ACROSS PAVEMENT NOR SHALL T S S S III ';I f I J i -I + I ^+ / _ / 14 / 8 / ill J THE SYSTEM SHALL INCORPORATE A RAIN SENSOR INTO IRRIGATION SYSTEM. r_ t I Ii o, I \ \ �p 1 f SG a / qll Co �, of �^ 0' � o J ► ! G F I PLANTINGS OUTSIDE THE LIMITS OF IRRIGATION ARE TO BE WATERED REGULARLY UNTIL PLANTING/SOD/SEED HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. +153 I ����� A GF WOOD MULCH II z Q I ov �� �� f (TYP.) QUALIFICATION mn�j.� { II 20 8 / Z / _ J GF GF / I I LU (j CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are ILL C instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely 51 /, 6 NO MOW ,''�1 ^� r i \ with respect to this project.These CADD files shall not be used on other projects,for additions to this project,or for completion �50 I J� / M GRASS SEED ,f1f / 12 / I I y / of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant.With the Consultant's approval,others may be (TYP.) 1,1 / • lim /r i \ / permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for 8 information and reference only.All intentional or unintentional i revisions,additions,or deletions to these CADD files shall be made at the full risk of that party making such revisions,additions LId I 6 n� AE / 1 0 G F / I J or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the I IRRIGATION LIMITS (TYP.) GF / Consultant from any&all responsibilities,claims,and liabilities. F 143 I � �/ ��__� / 12 12 I LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: • • 1421 I I N/ ,P �p �, GF GF / / I ONE(1)OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS SHADE TREE FOR EVERY 2 000 SF OF TOTAL BUILDINGNS SUBMITTAU. 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL • S AREA OR ONE (1)TREE FOR EVERY 100 FEET OF SITE PERIMETER-WHICHEVER IS GREATER. I � G B 14 I [3� QB GF SKH i � I � 7" -70,430/2,000 SF=36 SHADE TREES I`. 2 //{{ -4,646/100 FEET=47 SHADE TREES Y 2 SKH 12 ♦♦ r �jr,4 " 8 I ONL (1)CONIFEROUS TREE FOR EVERY 2,000 SF OF BUILDING OR ONE(1)CONIFEROUS Ir �� 80 -f - TREE FOR EVERY 200 FEET OF SITE PERIMETER-WHICHEVER IS GREATER. F � GAS Gr F\\9� /� \ WB .�/ �,� 1 / -4,646 70,430 30 200 FEET F 24 CONIFEROUS TREES TREES:. �\ 1933— `� 1 i ,,r i 'WATER J 931 cM \ /' \ \�; /� PER °1AN / ONE(1)ORNAMENTAL TREE FOR EVERY 2,000 SF OF BUILDING OR ONE(1)ORNAMENTAL % \ \ AT or ROY M - - 2 uT'uTY S EME QB / r r ' I - � I FOR EVERY 200 FEET OF SITE PERIMETER-WHICHEVER IS GREATER. - - - - - -�\Z _ - - SKH F, DCE _- - - - SOD (TYP.) 3 717] - - - - - - - - / - - � - - - - - - - - - - - "� - - - r _ - 5 WHP -70,430/2,000SF=36ORNAMENTALTREES • •• •( / 90 1 F / -4,646/200 FEET=24 ORNAMENTAL TREES SIGNATURE� � __-_ � v c / TH I—— j�/ I � � I hereby certify that this plan,spe I at' or re rt was \ 9 �\\\ �` , \ : :° .• r? prepared by me or under Ire s ery that ONE(1)SHRUB FOR EVERY 300 SF OF BUILDING OR ONE(1)SHRUBS FOR EVERY 30 FEET I aTmaaddlyjiterr�as�dlands �hive 1 J\ � / / \\\\ \ \ � ..: � '•• .. ,.. ..: �, •'�• r I / � �,r, �� I I IaEnl�efSi�d�i�1' tsota. \ \ �/ k• •:• .,. /, , , � ,� 1 OF SITE PERIMETER-WHICHEVER IS GREATER. \ \ ET p ° y , .� RB Y CAf / AA� Y. . I" 70,430/300 SF= 235 SHRUBS Ekbm+�-lay EXISTING TREES (TYP.) r •, r / / _ � = Licens o $0080 \\ —q22-� / \ ,/ / \ •,` a // 4,646/30 FEET 155 SHRUBS r r ll 1 / 924 / \ . ..\ � ,' q33 ,.J/, '�.'� / / � Date \\ I I ---- \\( 9 0 ;.'`�•: w / + a3 �+►� �� ; / /\" ' `' SCREENING FOR PARKING ALONG FRONTAGE-MUST AVERAGE ONE(1) EVERGREEN OR • CONTROL Q .108 \ 1\ l �924 SHADE TREE PER 30 FEET OF PERIMETER FRONTAGE. I / CL 6 6 9 I / , .•. /// / / / Loucks Project No. 22012 UJI ' 1` 919 LF/30 FEET=31 TREES* Project Lead JJD v 9 92 I I \ I /' q2 -'- \\� ,' / "• \ \ / /� 93/ ! QB // ' � / TREES REQUIRED- 31 TREES Drawn By � o gs 90 I s \` ' ' \��\ % I + + // / , // / 3P / TREES PROVIDED- 56 TREES Checked B TWW z 94g' '894 \ �I {�� ~/ \ �\ \ I ��� / °° \9v > ` / �' / // ' /" Review Date xx/xx/22 I F I 1 a 01 u� % TREE SUMMARY \\\ .� . r / SHEET INDEX N I I \ \ �,PQ"P q22 / I I j �/ I '•°' ` N ` / / j / ��O / - / e/ ' I I �/ �� / �1 // / 5 / SHADE TREES REQUIRED: 47 076, ) / .1 / I ' 930� r i ° ` 6• 1 ` i WHP ' / / V / SHADE TREES PROVIDED: 185 C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS 81 C�l s / - - -L - �/ it( 3 \ GL q31� EXISTING SHADE TREES: 117 C�_2 DEMOLITSION PLAN TE PLAN s C3-1 GRADING PLAN PROPOSED SHADE TREES: 68 84 C3-2 SWPPP PLAN 3 g / / \ ° / \ w /// / / I CONIFEROUS TREES REQUIRED: 36 C3-3 SWPPP NOTES \ CONIFEROUS TREES PROVIDED: 36 / 01 , 4'w '11 - s "� \ r ' I ° � \ -7 / `� / C4-1 UTILITY PLAN a 3 `\ \ , ° . "'• EXISTING CONIFEROUS TREES: 18 v / 12 \ J 6 / ` / PROPOSED CONIFEROUS TREES: 18 C8-1 to C8-3 CIVIL DETAILS o / \ /�� 6 ` �•''}��'' L1-1 TREE INVENTORY z �� I ��6 °�:': .:• ,. \ ( , .... L2-1 LANDSCAPE PLANS g / �\ \ ORNAMENTAL TREES REQUIRED: 36 L3-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS \ � ° ORNAMENTAL TREES PROVIDED: 15 CK Q / I \ \� \\ r ���'li ° / �. `'� EXISTING ORNAMENTAL TREES: 0 \ ' .'-/ 9`'� I 1\ i ` �O�F 9 °' �� o \\\ �" J�� PROPOSED ORNAMENTAL TREES: 15 `� 0 N0�RE55PASJ 1� L� � L =N= v 6 .' \ i /^ \ �9 - SHRUBS REQUIRED: 235 �, / ,�, 0 6 I o�/ I /� / ��':: :./ `�` i/ I SHRUBS PROVIDED: 441 \Ids i V. a2° 0 50 100 EXISTING SHRUBS: 146 nl \ � ` 9 N , ,' f \\��� ^� '\;�\ �cNr, ` \ , I PROPOSED SHRUBS: 295 C14O I / i'/ \ '- i I f 11. (A \\\\\\` 99i Nr 4'� /I 1 \ •/ J r ` \ ',.. \ N \ ,n' ,i' / � F ", I'\ ,-' i \\�\\\ \ 44p R\ '�r,.' / ,� �\ `�� ,��. *THE SCREENING REQUIREMENT IS INCLUDED WITHIN THE REQUIRED ?j ,/ ,i' / 0 �' ,i f / / \ \9��6\ \ \l'� �• / al v / SCALE IN FEET TREES PROVIDED ABOVE. Mi'' / p1 i p[�i�M II�� \ �q \ 9 ` [ CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! WARNING: LANDSCAPE �� 'i' 11I1 GPorJd'r� A fNr f\ ` \fi\ -Y �� \ ` �` �, / / / ' AINAGE AND UTILI / ll„ � c341�a3a i f K ` a� THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL -� /- Gopher State One Cal c� , r / � ' , ' � EAS�f'9fsNT PER DO ; �V Wg �\ �u� 1 2016s .• �V / �1 , I EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN PLAN o ,' I i i' i' ' i/y �'60 \ _ / �/\ c 3 < /' / / ( + TWIN CITY AREA 651-454-0002 MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES. 1 Ll I 111 MI N I N0. 3g12 40 ,�e �__� A \ �\ � \ a 4 .� ' I 9 2 / .�' .' - // �� - %\ ek�\v j /^� \\ \ �. ate• \ �'. 32 z / d°a nnt/� TOLL FREE: 1-800 252 1166 THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT yo �q 6 ` \ `• �n� LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, ` \` d� ��' ��' / \ �,�' �/ �� \ / ��/ I I \\�\ \ Ni / G \ \ /- \ \ / ti / CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES,VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE Il/ �. �, , -q /� / / I II DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGEDL2ml Q; / \ �\ i' �,' / /�'� -' C / L / 9`, \— I I J \� 4 Aby, \ q32 ��`3 \v`� DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. PLANT SCHEDULE DECIDUOUS TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE AE 7 ACCOLADE ELM Ulmus 'Morton' B & B 2.5"Cal AM 4 ARMSTRONG MAPLE Acer freemanii 'Armstrong' B & B 2.5"Cal TRAINING GB 4 GINKGO TREE Ginkgo biloba B & B 2.5"Cal NOTES: NOTES: MALE NON-FRUITING THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FACILITY GL 8 GREENSPIRE LINDEN Tilia cordata 'Greenspire' B & B 2.5"Cal MAINTAINING ALL TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION MAINTAINING ALL TREES IN A PLUMB POSITION RIVER BIRCH THROUGH THE WARRANTY PERIOD. STAKING IS THROUGH THE WARRANTY PERIOD. STAKING IS RB 8 CLUMP Betula nigra B & B 8' HGT SUGGESTED, BUT NOT REQUIRED. ANY STAKING SUGGESTED, BUT NOT REQUIRED. ANY STAKING MUST CONFORM WITH PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN MUST CONFORM WITH PRACTICES AS DEFINED IN 13620 FenwayBlvd N, Hugo, SGM 16 SIENNA GLEN MAPLE Acer freemanii 'Sienna Glen' B & B 2.5"Cal A.N.A.GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD PRACTICES. A.N.A.GUIDELINES FOR STANDARD PRACTICES. 55038 SKH 16 SKYLINE HONEYLOCUST Gleditsia triacanthos 'Skycole' B & B 2.5"Cal PRUNE DAMAGED AND CROSSING BRANCHES ' PRUNE ANY DAMAGED BRANCHES AFTER PLANTING QB 5 SWAMP WHITE OAK Quercus bicolor B & B 2.5"Cal AFTER PLANTING IS COMPLETE. I IS COMPLETE. o ,,,IIIIII I I I I I I I•EVERGREEN TREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE CUT BACK WIRE BASKET. II II II WATER TREE THOROUGHLY DURING PLANTING a�WHITE PINE ,I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I OPERATIONS. PLACE BACKFILL IN 8-12"LIFTS AND WHP 18 Pinus strobus B & B 6' HGT WATER TREE THOROUGHLY DURING PLANTING I SATURATE SOIL WITH WATER. DO NOT COMPACT FULL FORM • OPERATIONS. PLACE BACKFILL IN 8-12"LIFTS AND I MORE THAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PLUMB. SATURATE SOIL WITH WATER. DO NOT COMPACT ORNAMENTALTREES QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME CONT SIZE �- ^ + r MORE THAN NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN PLUMB. ,,,,,,,,IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII �IIIIIIIII XCELENERGY TH 5 THORNLESS HAWTHORN Crataegus crus-galli 'Inermis' B & B 1.5"Cal ' WHITESPIRE BIRCH �. 111111 CLUMP WB 10 Betula populifolia 'Whitespire Sr.' B & B 8' HGT IIIIIII 16"x2"POLYPROPYLENE OR �O 16"X2"POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE STRAP ••"" I III I I I POLYETHYLENE STRAP OWNER ADDRESS SHRUBS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE SPACING IIIIII,II , IIIIII, TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH ,I I I I I I I I SAFETY FLAGGING-ONE PER WIRE AC 25 AUTUMN MAGIC CHOKEBERRY Aronia melanocarpa 'Magic Carpet' 5 gal 24" HGT 48" o.c. I ■ SAFETY FLAGGING-ONE PER WIRE MULCH-4"DEEP-SEE NOTES OR SPECS.MULCH FC 57 GOLD TIDE FORSYTHIA Forsythia x 'Courtasol' TM 5 gal 42" o.c. I I I I MUST NOT BE IN CONTACT WITH TRUNK. GF 170 GRO-LOW FRAGRANT SUMAC Rhus aromatica 'Gro-Low' 5 gal 24" SPRD 48" o.c. ( ROOT FLARE EVEN WITH OR JUST ABOVE GRADE "I II II II II III II II II I I O U C KS II IIII III ,IIIIIII I I I I I. BACKFILL WITH IN SITU TOPSOIL IIII PLANNING CONIFEROUS SHRUBS QTY COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME MIN CONT MIN SIZE SPACING MULCH-4"DEEP. NO MULCH IN CONTACT WITH III'Il [)ITFHI II WOOD STAKE (OPTIONAL) CIVIL ENGINEERING SG 43 SEA GREEN JUNIPER Juniperus chinensis 'Sea Green' 5 gal 18" SPRD 60" o.c. I TRUNK-SEE NOTES OR SPECS. EDGE VARIES-SEE PLAN LAND SURVEYING I LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE GROUND COVERS CODE COMMON NAME BOTANICAL NAME 2x ROOT BALIJ`IJNIDTH BACKFILL WITH IN SITU TOPSOIL = ENVIRONMENTAL / I I WOOD STAKE —III —III- 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 SEED 3 NO MOW GRASS SEED REFER TO SPEC SECTION 32-9219 SEED MIX BY PRAIRIE NURSERY OR EQUAL � EDGE VARIES N— —I I — SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE Maple Grove, M 55369 RE • •o• • _I I = ' '—III—III—III—III PRIOR TO PLANTING 763.424.5505 Ile SCARIFY BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR www.loucksinc.com STONE MULCH SM-1 WASHED GREY TRAP ROCK 2.5" I MI III— TO PLANTING ROOT BALL SET ON UNDISTURBED SUBGRADE INSTALLED OVER FABRIC — — STONE MULCH-TRAP ROCK ,III,—, ,III, —; SET PLANT ON UNDISTURBED NATIVE SOIL SM-2 GRAY TRAP ROCK ROCK 3"-6" NOTE: RIP RAP" 3" DEPTH CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING NOTE: PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. SOD TURF SOD CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR TESTING NOTIFY L I IMMEDIATELY I PERCOLATION RATES PRIOR TO PLANTING. POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY IF WETLAND SEED MIX POOR DRAINAGE EXISTS. SEED 4 REFER TO SPEC SECTION 32-921916 CADD QUALIFICATION BWSR SEED MIX 34-261 RIPARIAN SOUTH AND WEST %•�%•�%•��:�%•�%•�%• WOOD MULCH DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING �� LOUCKS CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING LOUCKS 1 2 k -k -k -k -k -k -k WM-1 SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely SCALE: N.T.S. SCALE: N.T.S. with respect to this project.These CADD files shall not be used Deciduous Tree Planting.dwg Coniferous Tree Planting.dwg on other projects,for additions to this project,or for completion of this project by others without written approval by the Consultant.With the Consultant's approval,others may be LANDSCAPE INSTALLATION: permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawing files for information and reference only.All intentional or unintentional revisions,additions,or deletions to these CADD files shall be GENERAL NOTES BEING PROTECTED ORQUALITY, HEAVY,WATERPROOF CREPE PAPER MANUFACTURED FOR THIS made at the full risk of that party making such revisions,additions or PURPOSE. WRAP ALL DECIDUOUS TREES PLANTED IN THE FALL PRIOR TO 12-1 AND REMOVE ALL Consultant from anyhat&a all responsibilities, hold harmless clams, indemnify the Consultant from any&all responsibilities,claims,and liabilities. COORDINATE THE PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION AND PLANTING INSTALLATION WITH OTHER WRAPPING AFTER 5-1. CONTRACTORS WORKING ON SITE. SUBMITTAUREVISIONS NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN FERTILIZER 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA. ALL PLANT MATERIALS SHALL BE FERTILIZED UPON INSTALLATION WITH A 27-3-3 SLOW RELEASE REFER TO PLAN SHRUBS TO BE PLACED SO THAT TOP OF VARIES FERTILIZER MIXED IN WITH THE PLANTING SOIL PER THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. PLANTS 18" MIN. CONTAINER SITS FLUSH WITH PROPOSED GRADE SEE PLAN MULCH 3"MIN. DEPTH-SEE NOTES ALL PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER PLANTING DETAILS. REMOVE ALL FLAGGING AND LABELS MAY BE TREATED FOR SUMMER AND FALL INSTALLATION WITH AN APPLICATION OF GRANULAR FROM PLANTS. 27-3-3 AT 6 OZ PER 2.5"CALIPER PER TREE AND 3 OZ PER SHRUB WITH AN ADDITIONAL APPLICATION PLANTING SOIL-SEE NOTES OR SPEC OF 27-3-3 THE FOLLOWING SPRING IN THE TREE SAUCER. EDGING MATERIAL-SEE NOTES. IF THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS CONCERNED OR PERCEIVES ANY DEFICIENCIES IN THE PLANT MULCH-3"DEPTH-SEE NOTES OR SPEC. EDGE VARIES-REFER TO PLAN SELECTIONS, SOIL CONDITIONS OR ANY OTHER SITE CONDITION WHICH MIGHT NEGATIVELY EDGING FOR PLANTING BEDS Q LANDSCAPE FABRIC-SEE NOTES OR SPEC. Q AFFECT PLANT ESTABLISHMENT,SURVIVAL OR GUARANTEE, HE MUST BRING THESE DEFICIENCIES TO < THE ATTENTION OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO PROCUREMENT AND/OR INSTALLATION. BLACK METAL EDGER TO BE USED TO CONTAIN SHRUBS, PERENNIALS, AN D ANNUALS WHERE BED \ EDGING MATERIAL-SEE NOTES OR SPEC. MEETS SOD/SEED UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. U EDGE VARIES-REFER TO PLAN Z �� � � 12"DEPTH(MIN)LOAM PLANTING SOIL PROTECT ALL EXISTING TREES ON SITE SCHEDULED TO REMAIN. IF EXISTING TREES ARE DAMAGED IN Z �_ /�/ /�/�/�i \/�/ \ �\ �\ �\//�\ �\//�\// / —I SEE NOTES ANY MANNER,ABOVE OR BELOW GROUND IN THE ROOT SYSTEM,AN ASPHALTIC TREE PRUNING PLANTING BED PREPARATION / / / _ _ m /�/�/�/�/�/�/�/ III I I (- PAINT SHOULD BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY AFTER WOUNDING. /�/�/� / PLANTINGALL ANNUAL AND PERENNIAL BEDS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD/STONE SOIL & GROUNDCOVER MULCH WITH NOW WEED BARRIER. LOOSEN LOOSEN ROOTS OF ALL CONTAINERIZED PLANTS.SCARIFY I I I III I I • • I= BOTTOM AND SIDES OF HOLE PRIOR TO PLANTING I —III III III NOTE: I hereby certify that this plan,spe i ation or re rt was ALL PLANTING AREAS RECEIVING GROUND COVER PERENNIALS ANNUALS AND/OR VINES SHALL ALL SHRUB BED MASSINGS TO RECEIVE 3" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD/STONE MULCH AND FIBER LOOSEN ROOTS OF PLANT MATERIAL PRIOR TO prepared by tk s under ire s ery that ' ' ' I I I I I I— I I I I I I— PLANTING la3maaddlyi�iterr�as-d?diands �laive RECEIVE A MINIMUM OF 12" DEPTH OF PLANTING SOIL CONSISTING OF AT LEAST 45 PARTS TOPSOIL, MAT WEED BARRIER. —, las&*oS&3tc5tdtVro 98vtmsota. 45 PARTS PEAT OR MANURE AND 10 PARTS SAND. �� ALL TREES NOT IN PLANTING BEDS TO RECEIVE 4" DEEP SHREDDED HARDWOOD/STONE MULCH \v E��m lay WHERE SOD/SEED ABUTS PAVED SURFACES, FINISHED GRADE OF SOD/SEED SHALL BE HELD 1" RING WITH NO MULCH IN DIRECT CONTACT WITH TREE TRUNK. SHRUB PLANTING LO U C KS PERENNIAL PLANTING LO U C KS Licens o $eo8o BELOW SURFACE ELEVATION OF TRAIL, SLAB,CURB, ETC. � 4 Date Cj� SPREAD GRANULAR PRE EMERGENT HERBICIDE(PREEN OR EQUAL) PER MANUFACTURER'S SCALE: N.T.S. SCALE: N.T.S. Q SEED ALL AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING OTHER THAN THOSE AREAS NOTED TO RECEIVE SOD. RECOMMENDATIONS UNDER ALL MULCHED AREAS. Shrub Planting.dwg Perennial Planting.dwg QUALITY CONTROL w SEED SHALL BE INSTALLED AND MULCHED AS PER MNDOT SPECS. o MAINTENANCE STRIPS TO HAVE EDGER AND MULCH AS SPECIFIED/INDICATED ON DRAWING OR IN Loucks Project No. 22012 o_ SOD ALL DESIGNATED AREAS DISTURBED DUE TO GRADING. SOD SHALL BE LAID PARALLEL TO THE Project Lead JJD Q SPECIFICATION. U CONTOURS AND SHALL HAVE STAGGERED JOINTS.ON SLOPES STEEPER THAN 3:1 OR IN DRAINAGE Drawn By Ow 0 SWALES,THE SOD SHALL BE STAKED TO THE GROUND. INSPECTION AND WARRANTY z Checked By 1�1A0�F� Review Date xx/xx/22 LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THAT SOIL AND COMPACTION CONDITIONS ARE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A WRITTEN REQUEST FOR THE OWNER ACCEPTANCE INSPECTION OF 7 SHEET INDEX J ADEQUATE TO ALLOW FOR PROPER DRAINAGE AT AND AROUND THE BUILDING SITE. ALL LANDSCAPE AND SITE IMPROVEMENTS. C1-1 EXISTING CONDITIONS PLANTINGS INFO CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR ON-GOING MAINTENANCE OF ALL NEWLY INSTALLED MATERIALS C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN i.� a UNTIL TIME OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. ANY ACTS OF VANDALISM OR DAMAGE WHICH MAY OCCUR C2-1 SITE PLAN n ALL PLANT MATERIAL SHALL COMPLY WITH THE LATEST EDITION OF THE AMERICAN STANDARD FOR PRIOR TO OWNER ACCEPTANCE SHALL BE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR. C3-1 GRADING PLAN 3 NURSERY STOCK, AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE, ALL CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH A MAINTENANCE PROGRAM INCLUDING, BUT C3-2 SWPPP PLAN �I SHRUBS SHALL HAVE AT LEAST 5 CANES AT THE SPECIFIED MINIMUM SHRUB HEIGHT OR WIDTH. NOT NECESSARILY LIMITED TO, PRUNING, FERTILIZATION AND DISEASE/PEST CONTROL. C3-3 SWPPP NOTES ORNAMENTAL TREES SHALL HAVE NO V CROTCHES AND SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER C4-1 UTILITY PLAN Q THAN T ABOVE ROOT BALL.STREET AND BOULEVARD TREES SHALL BEGIN BRANCHING NO LOWER CONTRACTOR SHALL GUARANTEE NEW PLANT MATERIAL THROUGH ONE (1)CALENDAR YEAR FROM C8-1 to C8-3 CIVIL DETAILS o THAN 5'ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. THE DATE OF OWNER ACCEPTANCE. 1-1-1 TREE INVENTORY z L2-1 LANDSCAPE PLANS g ANY CONIFEROUS TREE PREVIOUSLY PRUNED FOR CHRISTMAS TREE SALES SHALL NOT BE USED. ALL WARRANTY(ONE(1) FULL GROWING SEASON) FOR LANDSCAPE MATERIALS SHALL BEGIN ON THE L3-1 LANDSCAPE DETAILS Q CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL BE FULL FORM, NATURAL TO THE SPECIES,WITHOUT PRUNING. DATE OF ACCEPTANCE BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT AFTER THE COMPLETION OF PLANTING OF Q ALL LANDSCAPE MATERIALS. NO PARTIAL ACCEPTANCE WILL BE CONSIDERED. 0 PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP Q OF THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE TIMING OF INSTALLATION v ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR.WHEN THE BALLED & BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED,THE ROOT COLLAR/ ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE. UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE THE APPROPRIATE DATES FOR SPRING PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLATION 0 N AND SEED/SOD PLACEMENT IS FROM THE TIME GROUND HAS THAWED TO JUNE 15. ALL PROPOSED PLANTS SHALL BE LOCATED AND STAKED AS SHOWN ON PLAN. ADJUSTMENTS IN o LOCATION OF PROPOSED PLANT MATERIALS MAY BE NEEDED IN FIELD. SHOULD AN ADJUSTMENT BE FALL SODDING IS GENERALLY ACCEPTABLE FROM AUGUST 15- NOVEMBER 1. FALL SEEDING FROM ADVISED,THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT MUST BE NOTIFIED. AUGUST 15 -SEPTEMBER 15; DORMANT SEEDING IN THE FALL SHALL NOT OCCUR PRIOR TO NOVEMBER 1. FALL CONIFEROUS PLANTING MAY OCCUR FROM AUGUST 15 -OCTOBER 1 AND PLAN TAKES PRECEDENCE OVER PLANT SCHEDULE IF DISCREPANCIES IN QUANTITIES EXIST. DECIDUOUS PLANTING FROM THE FIRST FROST UNTIL NOVEMBER 15. PLANTING OUTSIDE THESE M SPECIFICATIONS TAKE PRECEDENCE OVER NOTES. DATES IS NOT RECOMMENDED.ANY ADJUSTMENT MUST BE APPROVED IN WRITING BY THELANDSCAPE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. N NO PLANT MATERIAL SUBSTITUTIONS WILL BE ACCEPTED UNLESS APPROVAL IS REQUESTED OF THE N LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT BY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR PRIOR TO THE SUBMISSION OF A BID TREES ARE NOT TO BE PRUNED, REMOVED OR TRANSPLANTED BETWEEN APRIL 15 AND JULY 1. DETAILS AND/OR QUOTATION. NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT IF THESE DATES ARE UNAVOIDABLE, v 0 00 o WRAPPING MATERIAL SHALL BE CORRUGATED PVC PIPING 1"GREATER IN CALIPER THAN THE TREE REFER TO SHEET L2-1 FOR LANDSCAPE DATA, PLANTING PLAN, GENERAL NOTES,AND IRRIGATION -� NOTES. L3ml a- WARNING: CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! SITE NOTES NOTE: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CALLING FOR LOCATIONS OF ALL Gopher State One Call EXISTING UTILITIES. THEY SHALL COOPERATE WITH ALL UTILITY COMPANIES IN 1. ALL PAVING, CONCRETE CURB, GUTTER AND SIDEWALK SHALL BE FURNISHED AND INSTALLED IN EXISTING CONDITIONS INFORMATION SHOWN IS MAINTAINING THEIR SERVICE AND/OR RELOCATION OF LINES. TWIN CITY AREA:651-454-0002 ACCORDANCE WITH THE DETAILS SHOWN PER THE DETAIL SHEET(S) AND STATE/LOCAL BASED ON A SURVEY PREPARED BY CORNERSTONE THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL AT 651-454-0002 AT 11j�V TOLL FREE: 1-800-252-1166 JURISDICTION REQUIREMENTS. LEAST 48 HOURS IN ADVANCE FOR THE LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND WIRES, ACCESSIBLE PARKING AND ACCESSIBLE ROUTES SHALL BE PROVIDED PER CURRENT ADA LAND SURVEYING INC., DATED 06/14/2022. CABLES, CONDUITS, PIPES, MANHOLES,VALVES OR OTHER BURIED STRUCTURES BEFORE 2. TRAINING DIGGING. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REPAIR OR REPLACE THE ABOVE WHEN DAMAGED STANDARDS AND LOCAL/STATE REQUIREMENTS. DURING CONSTRUCTION AT NO COST TO THE OWNER. 3. ALL CURB DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE TO THE FACE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. FACILITY 4. ALL BUILDING DIMENSIONS ARE TO THE OUTSIDE FACE OF WALL UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. \� BITUMINOUS DRIVE PROPOSED SUBSTATION AREA PROJECT PROPOSED IN-PROCESSING BUILDING PROJECT a BITUMINOUS DRIVE 5. TYPICAL FULL SIZED PARKING STALL IS 9' X 18' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 55038 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -=x , - - x- - -x _x 771 FENCE - x 6. ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 5.0' UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 18Sd �BSd 78Sd �B � Sd 7BSd 78Sd -l8sd 78Sd -lBSd �8378Sd 7BSd 78Sd 718sd ease Mesa �ese., ease Mesa ease 7lese 78se�-lese -lese 718se -lose -lose Jese 7. SEE SITE ELECTRICAL PLAN FOR SITE LIGHTING. J 11 FF-- � � � � � r=i-I :::1 rtrtrt -r am m 1 127 �m U) 1 - 8. REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLAN FOR BUILDING SETBACKS. I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 �12 ,5 � 18.0' i i 9.0' 5,R 71 - " 80 -- -� ca f-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x-x� _18.0 -� 9 of CD / k x 11 24.0 TYP TYP DEVELOPMENT AND DESIGN STANDARDS TYP 5,R + - BUILDING SETBACKS: J x ®® x PV�O F bF I I I I I ! 5!R/�� �I qn XCELENERGY POLE HEIGHT=105'x � I 11 I IL- 41 24.0' i ll I P�RI IN�(TYP)I I I I 1 �0µ 1 24.0' JAI FRONT 30 FT MINIMUM I _I I 1 I 1 _I_ 1 11 II - I J SIDE EQUAL TO HEIGHT OF BUILDING I I ! ! ! ! i �I 11 _ m m g" (NOT LESS THAN 10 FT) MINIMUM j1 I I I I I I I I I I �I I I I _ REAR 30 FT MINIMUM x ��i I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I I I I O C`it - - �I � I _ r-9.0' 5'R 18.0'_ 5fR �I 6" PROPOSED SUBSTATION I TYP 24.0 161 TYP _ _ II OFF-STREET PARKING AND DESIGN STANDARD REQUIREMENTS . -� , / SEE PLANS PREPARED BY OTHERS I 11 /_.\ I I I F w^\ x � - y- - 5'R � _ _ _ �I OFF-STREET PARKING SETBACKS: r J " FRONT 10 FT MINIMUM POLE HEIGHT=83' 11 y T I t201� III J S CONCRETE APRON ESKAWT III 5'R m SEE CITY DETAIL SIDE 5 FT MINIMUM ■ * * x I 11 _� 0 24.0' - m 2 R i REAR 5 FT MINIMUM ■■ LoUCKS ctp I 21 A / j x 4 5'R 18.0' 5'R 5'R - MINIMUM PARKING LAYOUT DIMENSIONS (90 DEGREE PATTERN): 24.0' f- TYP 24.0' 18 0' PARKING SPACE WIDTH = 9 FT PLANNING I 11 5'R LL5'R 5'R I 5'R 5'R 5'R PARKING SPACE LENGTH = 18 FT DRIVE LANE WIDTH = 24 FT CIVIL ENGINEERING x I I 11 10 4' 5 �, --I d 25'R LAND SURVEYING W o ^^ ^ � R - °' � LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE ` ENVIRONMENTAL � I I �� B612 C&G (TYP.)-/ ° g, P 24.0' - 7" I SITE DATA POLE HEIGHT=62' „ 32.0 x � ° CURRENT ZONING: BUSINESS PARK 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 x�x I ` ` 5'R 7" PROPOSED ZONING: BUSINESS PARK Maple Grove, MN 55369 / I POLE HEIGHT=57' „ CONCRETE PAVEMENT FLAT CURB 6 5 R 763.424.5505 �a x�x SB I 11 1 - F-10.0 m J www.loucksinc.com x x-x-x-x x m m T PROPERTY AREA: 1,226,373 SF/±28.1 AC 0 co ,1 TYPICAL ADA �.�0 25'R \\ �� _47.4' „ PARKING STALLS m \ GRAVEL PARKING AREA ` „ SEE DETAIL 61 7" I PROPOSED BUILDING AREA: 70,488 sf/±1.6 ac (5.7%) / 50'R \ \�\ \\\ POLE HEIGHT=57' „ / ALLOWED UP TO 40/o \\\ �4 AD SEE DETAIA SIGN L lu PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA: 514,677 sf/±11.8 ac (41.9%) ` POND 1 8" �' ALLOWED UP TO 80% 2 �� � NWL=924.0 � � ^ � � 5'R V) I 20'R o� \ HWL=926.7 I m � a POLEHEIGHT=85' \ POLEHEIGHT=52' \ \\� 4' `co BTM=918.0 PROPOSED a z I OFF-STREET PARKING CALCULATIONS / I POLE HEIGHT=43' \ \ `� PATIO IN-PROCESSING \ 20'R \\ ` A11 I a BUILDING m CODE REQUIRED PARKING FOR PROPOSED BUILDING o �� o I ° ; 34,740 OFFICE BUILDING / 200 =173 PARKING STALLS 6200 TRAINING LABS / 500 =13 PARKING STALLS J o ��o � sB 5R J = A. . • • � -F3 POLE HEIGHT=52' C) �1 SB _ °° a a = TOTAL =186 PARKING STALLS / \ \ FFE-933.0 „� N I CADD files prepared by the Consultant for this project are � instruments of the Consultant professional services for use solely / POLE HEIGHT=64' \ \ \ w o „ z .f� z with respect to this project.These CADD files shall not be used / POLE HEIGHT=48' \\ PROPOSED PARKING PROVIDED on other projects,for additions to this project,or for completion \ Z k - of this project by others without written approval by the 24.0' m Q EXISTING STALLS REMOVED =22 Consultant.With the Consultant's approval,others may be FLAT CURB .� permitted to obtain copies of the CADD drawingfiles for POLE HEIGHT=79' \ \\ _47.4' ` „ I J PROOF OF PARKING =110 formation and reference only.All intentional or unintentional / \ _ (n J 8" Q revisions,additions,or deletions to these CADD files shall be n� POND 2 24' _ , � �� •0 m PROPOSED STALLS =229 made at the full risk of that party making such revisions,additions ' I NWL-919.0 \ TYP \ ` �� I 9'0 NEW TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED =317 or deletions and that party shall hold harmless and indemnify the HWL=920.7 POLE HEIGHT=55' POLE HEIGHT=57' _ TYP q" J I Consultant from any&all responsibilities,claims,and liabilities. BTM=914.0 / CONCRETE PAVEMENT m r ' - \ e i ' I / \50'R c r \ \ POLEHEIGHT=52' „ / LEGEND \ POLE HEIGHT=57' \ Q 08/05/22 PRELIM CITY SUBMITTAL + '� co PROPOSED TRANSMISSION LINES \\ \ „ / to ` CONCRETE SIDEWALK(TYP.) i co I (SEE PLANS PREPARED BY OTHERS) „ EXISTING PROPOSED CC! \\ \\ , m m z �� 1111/07/22 PROOF OF PARKING \ II / FUTURE SOLAR O®® CATCH BASIN 1 \ \ o W �O STORM MANHOLE Q \ 20 R _18.0 \ \ 50, - \ ` , X TRAINING AREA TYP L.L 14 I 1 FLARED END SECTION -40 1 15'R \ FUTURE WIND 1 ° 0 SANITARY MANHOLE TURBINE TRAINING -0 HYDRANT 4 W POLE HEIGHT=70' \ 0, \\\ \\ „ 9 d # pQ GATE VALVE N AREA W I 20'R m m J 61)m m POST INDICATOR VALVE OPiv / POLE HEIGHT=61 \\\ \ POLE HEIGHT=52' 11 m I 1 ® WATER MANHOLE/WELL + \ POLE HEIGHT=61' \\ 8 \ \ LIGHT POLE ' I POLE HEIGHT=70'� \ \\ 20,R \ 4.5 R 6 5'R " O POWER POLE �m w \ ♦ \\ �, 16 4.5'R J 8 O ELECTRIC METER r- I / ♦ \ O �� m J © GAS METER • • + ; '- / O \ +�,♦ �� 4.5'R 24.0' 00 m 7" ❑T TELEPHONE PEDESTAL PROFESSIONAL SIGNATUREd I hereby certify that this plan,spe anon Ep,t was I \ , T + ♦♦ 5 B612 C&G (TYP.) „ + 6 51R SIGN � prepared by me or under re s er" hethaPOLE HEIGHT=57' J 24•0 18 ` 8" I BENCHMARK of the Stat Lof Mied L tdsechite�txhe laws « + � � 1 I I a P GM ♦ ~♦ 15'\\\ �� TY - -- 80 -- - tB7' SOIL BORING �B- C", /' ♦ \ \ �� + .5'R 20 R J PARKING STALL COUNT a�.Ekhoff_LA I I + Q ♦ ♦ \ �`� GAS « ♦ ♦ \\ / 24.0' 12 6 m m ACCESSIBLE PARKING STALL License-f`�o 52050 ' --. / , yo ' GM\, I PROPOSED FENCE \ \ �4 4.5'R >> STORM SEWER Date j `' L �� I \�+ d eP « ♦♦ �/ � 10'R AND GATE TO \\ , ' + _ \♦ �� MATCH EXISTING \ 9 0' `-5.0' 6 I » aT- DRAINTILE » DT- • CONTROL POLE HEIGHT=66' , GM + �I/ ♦♦ `� \ 5'R I 6 4.5'R > SANITARY SEWER ♦ 05 �� 25.0' `�`- , FM FORCEMAIN FV Loucks Project No. 2201D2 + 0x� « ® � ® � �' �. 10.5 ' I WATERMAIN i Project Lead JJ 01G « « 5'R 'co m m s SANITARY SEWER SERVICE IIIEDrawn By CEF � , � �, •••;•. ____ ♦ ^ 24.0 5 R a -/-/- Checked By NWE z P ♦` 5'R w WATER SERVICE - Review Date 08/09/22 -l8S8 k' ` /0 24.0 g � + \d*� � G • GP`•.''•'• /// \\ ,•@ � � / i/ / ♦♦ a 5'R � I ELE UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC ELE ® UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC \ ❑� OSHEETINDEX r ,/ • / ' GATE o o: t % r / / '/ \� 24.0' FO FO - �/ \ � CONTROLS- ' / N h / 24•0' C1 1 EXISTING CONDITIONS • ® �x� �P v r // o /� T ♦ _GA UNDERGROUND GAS GAS N / ♦ PO , TEL UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE TEL C1-2 DEMOLITION PLAN U , + - P // m r., C2-1 SITE PLAN - +�. : , %/ { e+ 5'R Q , off OVERHEAD UTILITY eH C3-1 GRADING PLAN + , l - :;° G� // 5'R 1 1 I -x x- FENCE -x X- C3-2 SWPPP PLAN 41 { , / G': / rJ - ` s "• / R 6 -a o- CHAIN LINK FENCE -�� C3-3 SWPPP NOTES N , LYsC '9 3" CONCRETE SIDEWALK(TYP.) u. •♦ 5 R C4-1 UTILITY PLAN -a POLE HE IGHT=71' , ; ssR ��sr o corrrRas\\ ♦♦ 7 24.0' S R v , CONCRETE CURB C8-1 to C8-3 CIVIL DETAILS JI , / p� / + 9 0` ° \\\\ + ♦ 5,R `�� a a RETAINING WALL 4 L1-1 TREE INVENTORY j \ ' o o `� eox ♦♦� 5'R 2 a CONCRETE U T , 1 ,0 ` \` ♦ L3-1 LANDSCAPE DETAIL2-1 LANDSCAPE LS Q � / / FLOOR ELEv.� °' �\ NO PARKING Q ``� ; / / =934.0 /0 ♦♦ 5'R ¢ I ����� I BUILDING \ 3 ♦♦\ �e�2� CONTOUR � � + _FLOOR ELEv. • , • ' ♦ �" Xsn s SPOT ELEVATION X972.5 I =933.9 a o V POLE HEIGHT=52', \\ i/ ryti -RooFHEv. 3 '� � 3 ♦♦♦ 5'R Q ' 'Ox DIRECTION OF FLOW E1.0/ =959.9 Gq MATCH EXISTING TREE LINE EXISTNG BUILDING PARKING SETBACK LINE �saL _ � 20,3q5SQ.F o BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT CALL BOX-� o GP (ASS OWN) .,i ♦ 2 3 , \°° \a (AS SHOWN) 4" ♦ �, O� I BUILDING SETBACK LINE �sBL \ Co \ i '` .lF' •e• •_ -.09 FLOOR H.EV. J o - _ - PAVEMENT LEGEND Q \ �i' .� `, ,(4.0. ^ \ i-ROOF ELM o , `� �_V _N_ \ P•. / �v4.I �� Q/ - - - DENOTES LIGHT DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT s ° I \\ o N .'� I I �o�F 0> AR HALING oo .\ ` ` " I SITE DENOTES HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT ■ J� C, ^ N \ ` LAN O l '/ fy/ i ,� �'`/ ° EOuvrlENr-\ `�_F.00R ELEv. ' D =934.0 CASTING BUILDING �.`/ 0 50 100 DENOTES CONCRETE PAVEMENT "� NO TRESSPASS / ' / I O T zSTING0,q75 UILDIN ` '� / i' % I a �� vl. (As SHOWN) ` 9/2g� DENOTES GRAVEL PAVEMENT SCALE IN FEET C2mi 0 CL DOCUMENT PACKAGE cel Enerq.,.Ly ISSUED: August05. 2022 Ugo Nuclear ln � Processing PACKAGE: Preliminary City Submittal 20 Fenway B , MN 55038 RSP Architects 1220 Marshall Street NE 612.677.7100 Minneapolis 612.677.7499 fax PROJECT NUMBER : 6263 .315 . 03 Minnesota55413-1036 www.rsparch.com Consultants PROJECT TEAM CODE SUMMARY SHEET INDEX OWNER ARCHITECT LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT Xcel Energy RSP Architects, Ltd. LOUCKS 414 Nicollet Mall, Mezzanine, Minneapolis, MN 55401 1220 Marshall Street NE 7200 Hemlock Lane, Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55413 Maple Grove, MN 55369 Zachary Mahlum, Project Lead—Project Tenant Services Phone: 612.677.7100 Fax: 612.677.7499 Phone: 612.330.5547 Jonathan Donovan, Principal Civil Engineer Email:Zachary.Mahlum@xcelenergy.com Dave Norback, Principal Phone: 763.496.6724 Phone: 612.677.7100 Cell: 612.237.8569 Email: dave.norback@rsparch.com Email:JDonovan@loucksinc.com Gordon Strom, Project Architect/Manager Phone: 612.677.7344 Email: Gordon.Strom@rsparch.com Project For KEY PLAN Xcel Energy Hugo Nuclear In-PrnrP_q_qinn 1 Project No. T0 6263.315.03 / o o Drawn By RDP Checked By GS Date 08/05/22 „o NOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially O exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants,contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice. © Copyright RSP Architects 2019. All rights reserved. Sheet Issues/Revisions No. Date Description LOCATION MAP PROJECT LOCATION American Public Sto St­kinq_��Ca-ti-0 •� - :+ COVER SHEET 000 C:\Users\rpomerleau\Documents\A21_Hugo—Nuclear InProcessing_razieh.pomerleau.rvt 7/29/2022 11:39:08 AM RSP Architects 1220 Marshall Street NE 612.677.7100 Minneapolis 612.677.7499 fax Minnesota 55413-1036 www.rsparch.com Consultants Off' P� Q�. 262'- 11" 168'-6" 22'-6" 15'-8" 56'-3" Project For A401 N 4 Xcel Energy 0 0 Hugo Nuclear TRAINING 2 TRAINING 1 I n-PrnnP��lnn 2316 SF 2314 SF Project No. 6263.315.03 � BREAK GAS SIMULATOR 693 SF d Drawn By 1259 SF it RDP WOMENS MENS PANTRY/ RIGGING Checked By GS 348 SF 340 SF VEND LAB & Date 601 sFl TRAINING 08/05/22 1450 SF CV - ` J � � Q NOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including �" ` all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are v proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially r� exploited, in whole or in part, without express written Ll FIREWATCH/ permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited DRESS review and evaluation by clients, consultants,contractors, a J v v v v OUT government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice. 499SF I Copyright RSP Architects 2019. All rights reserved. 2 A401 ICE Sheet Issues/Revisions UNIS JAN C _ , I�- U No. Date Description rl LL o o _ o rn � A401 3 LA L Q qpq - REST SCHED. — — REST. 117 SF r �r- 7 — CI NURSES L J STATION OFFICE n I k h 11 k 374 SF REST REST COFFEE L — — JL — — JL — — JL — — JL — L J EVAL d -4 REST 117 SF ENTRY 0 GAS 0 1 - REST 1237 SF WELDING CLASSROOM Cl) Q L STOR L - - JL - - Jr - - JL - - JL - - J ST OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE EVAL EVAL II II STOR. GAS 185 SF 130 SF 130 SF 130 SF 131 SF TRAINING 3/COMPUTER ESOM CLASSROOM ROOM 1172 SF 2217 SF _ - N O CV � 1 A40 FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1 01 - FIRST FLOOR PLAN N 3/32"=1'-0" Al 01 C:\Users\rpomerleau\Documents\A21—Hugo—Nuclear InProcessing—razieh.pomerleau.rvt 7/29/2022 11:35:13 AM RSP Architects 1220 Marshall Street NE 612.677.7100 Minneapolis 612.677.7499 fax Minnesota 55413-1036 www.rsparch.com Consultants Off' P� Q�. 263'-4 1/2" 168'-11 1/2" 22'-6" 15'-8" 56'-3" Project For A401 N Xcel Energy 4 0 0 Hugo Nuclear OFFICE OPEN OFFICE I n-P rn r-a 4 4 i n n 117 SF 2756 SF Project No. BREAK6263.315.03 L Li LJ 426 SF 0 Drawn By RDP OFFICE MECH. Checked By OFFICE 120 SF WOMENS MENS 635 SF GS 116 SF 349 SF 340 SF Date 08/05/22 F1 o NOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are OFFICE MED. CONF proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially LJ120 SF I C D. exploited, in whole or in part, without express written OFFICE permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited 116 SF review and evaluation by clients, consultants,contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice. MECHANICAL UNITS © Copyright RSP Architects 2019. All rights reserved. OFFICE 2 A401 J L T�n Sheet Issues/Revisions 114 SF JA � ll COPY � N j _ N No. Date Description = OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE OFFICE ELEC. N 0 120 SF 120 SF 120 SF 120 SF 120 SF 120 SF 172 SF PREFUNCTION 04 STORAGE 1486 SF A401 3 60 �JCLASSROOM 5 CLASSROOM 4 CLASSROOM 3 CLASS ROOM 2 CLASSROOM 1 777 945 SF 945 SF 945 SF 949 SF 1053 SF MECHANICAL SCREENING C C C C ) ) ) ) C C C C ) ) ) ) C C C C M C C C C ) ) ) ) C C C C ) ) ) 12 C C C C UTILITY 194 S F IT ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 238 SF 1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN A401 02 - SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1 3/32"=1'-0" Al 02 C:\Users\rpomerleau\Documents\A21_Hugo—Nuclear InProcessing_razieh.pomerleau.rvt 7/29/2022 11:35:15 AM TEXTURED PRECAST PANELS WITH SCORE PATTERN COLOR: PEWTER METAL SUNSHADE STRUCTURE METAL PANELS SPANDREL PANEL TEXTURED PRECAST PANELS WITH SCORE PATTERN SPANDREL PANELS METAL PANEL EQUIPMENT SCREEN COLOR: OUTBACK — TRANSLUCENT CLERESTORY WINDOWS T�z I L. I I 192' 1 1/2" WOOD LOOK METAL PANEL SYSTEM ALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING SYST ,M 71' 3" 13'-1" 11'-3" 130'-5" 13'-9' 23'-2' 15'-0" 30'-5" 25'-10" ROOF - - - -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - EL= 136'-0" o 0 o / 50 02-SECOND FLOOR EL= 118'-0" — - — RSP Architects 1220 Marshall Street NE 612.677.7100 80 o Minneapolis 612.677.7499 fax N - Minnesota 55413 1036 www.rsparch.com o O co zo ' 01 FIRST FLOOR SIGN PUNCHED WINDOW OPENINGS MAIN VISITOR ENTRANCE 04 ELEVATION - EAST 3/32"=1'-0" METAL SUNSHADE STRUCTURE SPANDREL PANEL ALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM TEXTURED PRECAST PANELS WITH SCORE PATTERN WOOD LOOK METAL PANEL SYSTEM 41'-11 1/2" 8'-6 1/2" METAL PANELS 40'-3 1/4" COLOR: PE TER 3'-2" 5'-1" 3'-81/2" G TEXTURED PRECAST PANELS WITH SCORE PATTERN METAL PANEL EQUIPMENT SCREEN COLOR: OUTBACK Q� TRANSLUCENT CLERESTORY WINDOWSROOF 94'-0" EL= 136'-0" _ 2 '-11" 50'-10" 15'-3" o o , Project For Nzo Xcel Energy 0 02_SECOND FLOOR co 02_SECOND FLOOR EL= 118 0 EL= 118 0 _ Hugo Nuclear In PrnrPinn - - o. o C. Project N 6263.315.03 Drawn By RDP \ •. / /, \ _ - Checked By 01 FIRST FLOOR 01 FIRST FLOOR7-777717-- EL= 100'-0" EL= 100,-0" G S 10"X10"OVERHEAD DOOR ENTRANCE TO GAS WELDING AREA 10"X10"OVERHEAD DOOR Date 08/05/22 H.M. DOOR AND FRAME PUNCHED WINDOW OPENINGS L SOUTH EMPLOYEE ENTRANCE H.M. DOOR AND FRAME NOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are 2 ELEVATION - NORTH 3 ELEVATION - SOUTH proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written 3/32"=1'-0" 3/32"= 1'-O" permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited review and evaluation by clients, consultants,contractors, government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in accordance with this Notice. © Copyright RSP Architects 2019. All rights reserved. Sheet Issues/Revisions No. Date Description METAL PANELS METAL SUNSHADE STRUCTURE TEXTURED PRECAST PANELS WITH SCORE PATTERN METAL PANEL EQUIPMENT SCREEN TEXTURED PRECAST PANELS WITH SCORE PATTERN COLOR: OUTBACK ALUMINUM STOREFRONT GLAZING SYSTEM WOOD LOOK METAL PANEL SYSTEM COLOR: PEWTER SPANDREL PANEL 71'-2 1/2" SPANDREL PANEL 192'- 1 1/2" 25'-91/2" 30'-5" 15'-0" 23'-2" 38'-41/2" 11'-2" 116'-9" '-8' ROOF EL= 136'-0" - - - JL Zo 0 0 0 / 6 -• _ zo zo o i � - 0 0 �02-SECOND FLOOR o0 00 EEL= 118'-0" — � Cl) 00 O O Co V) N .. - -• CO �01 FIRST FLOOR Y tL= 100'-0" \ BREAK ROOM ENTRANCE PUNCHED WINDOW OPENINGS EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 4 ELEVATION - WEST 3/32"=1'-0" A401 C:\Users\rpomerleau\Documents\A21-Hugo-Nuclear InProcessing-razieh.pomerleau.rvt 7/29/2022 11:35:19 AM ke to Ar f4 IF � 19 �*,r J r ram. ! - .. rF• �, y •� •.ter yl '.�.� r..,�: � � � i. t i4 .,i• ti �I� ���f �.'I+ "- ± . '? ; P S. Aip �joF. oleo i *.. i+_4"%k. - - xt�- r .� {a .• `rY,a r� f� � .•�T `► ''4 y � fi • '�~ rt � 7s IFrF 4 . , :�'4 ;� �.. •r..� ,i..', '. x �'R _ er. �-+ r '+F r" J { -- r ti ' w �1�. 4. " .� ` + •,1r� Y •. SSA ' _ y'# t ' J• ' ' lob lip it �'i #' . ' } w ti y� r * rs Y {. l rv.f y�r �- _ ; •14� �•k" �+ rL f #.. ¢. y AM - __. wd 5 •�;_ - rt .. .�.: ��`� +F 4� '� • �''_ `fir F � r � l#F - _ *" •_ _ _ #' r, ♦ t +4 i • I I 4 1 �: t � Y l �•L��, 1 1 • ¢ arty } T 1 , Alt mf _ �r i �_ Y �* t'� f• 111• 1 1 1' 11 '1 1,1 '11 1 jo yy yo _ 1 1 1 1 1 1 s R JY a , - -r �,� y4 _ -I �" ¢ 'y { .� - - -�!' O 11 1 I 1 •1 " f �. ' IliI.� .�Irt"'� phw h�91 • +*, -- AML . � �y�, ��� •rr �'*�t S `,} 'F_ •' j .� Y' .*gyp' r �- * a .�_ '- l � r*- +7 y -- �,_ _ OL�' - • i�"t �_a .�i � - T.�� �s Y' 'T• � ati` i� i•`' _ � • • � �. �s� � _a Ar *i 41-'r Y I ' 11 11 � 11 ' 1 1 11 yy 'i i 1 *fti 4- imilliplppr—�� J i : firek RSP Architects x, 1220 Marshall Street NE 612.677.7100 Minneapolis 612.677.7499 fax Minnesota 55413-1036 www.rsparch.com Consultants - , .. r. NORTHEAST CORNER SOUTHEAST CORNER GP�oti Q� Project For Xcel Energy Hugo Nuclear In-Prnr.P-qginn Project No. 6263.315.03 Drawn By RDP Checked By GS r- Date 08/05/22 l ....._ NOTICE: The designs shown and described herein including all technical drawings, graphics, and models thereof, are proprietary and cannot be copied,duplicated or commercially exploited, in whole or in part, without express written permission of RSP Architects. These are available for limited -- — TY .� review and evaluation by clients, consultants,contractors, 1 ----- ;� � � government agencies, vendors and office personnel only in _ accordance with this Notice. ,. ' f - - -__ -� © Copyright RSP Architects 2019. All rights reserved. .�• Sheet Issues/Revisions -------------- --_ --- ---__ _ No. Date Description #1 h _ _ +r SOUTHWEST CORNER NORTHWEST CORNER 3D VIEWS A602 C:\Users\rpomerleau\Documents\A21—Hugo—Nuclear InProcessing—razieh.pomerleau.rvt 7/29/2022 11:35:20 AM a k a` \%,. � -A,' • � AAA AAA Vie- Of AI All, IF pp 6 AV / + IF AI All it c� , w , f .:��� 0 ,14 t all AAA— M1 AAA r, ! savor AAA, . - - NMI .. M III all illillillllllllllllll11111,11111111111,1 M� I I I minim Y 11011omav r1Y 71M lTi�l�i iis rti�ti � • r � i I I f 1 I 1 a. - -li �I�IfI � � `'•All bToii, �1T I �, 16bFb � F l e w '� r7 �I � � �� y ,::, .. ,� w 11 ■tag , . .G�r . . ppm i �� „- fir, I r . ._ � � . . . ,I � n �1 < I } � ' 1 t i e ice . r" L; y 1` � � v t , e� . f _ so 4 . . l 4 - F is � ; Ir ' to NAM yp y i sI - d> > —. - • _ _ _ oo r - r, 4 % r r - < . R tiF - .: . : - - _ _ % Op el - _ _. -ii • -v _ - - - ._.Yr c _ - w Is �_ _ _ .- • . _. r - .. K. _ _ _ _ % _ o. ..__ - .., - .E - - ri CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning and Zoning Application Staff Report TO: Hugo Planning Commission FROM: Max Gort, Associate Planner, through Rachel Juba, Community Development Director. SUBJECT: Summit Management LLC.—Rosemary Place Sketch Plan DATE: November 4, 2022, for the Planning Commission Meeting of November 10, 2022 REVIEW DEADLINE (120-days): January 7, 2023 1. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY(EDA) MEETING UPDATE: At its October 18, 2022, meeting the EDA reviewed and provided comments on the sketch plan. The EDA generally agreed that a multi-family residential use on the property may be more viable than commercial uses, since the visibility is not great. They states that there is commercial along CSAH 8 and it does fulfill the vision of the City to have commercial uses along CSAH 8. They states that the property is the back side of the commercial uses and would allow residents to walk to the adjacent commercial uses. One EDA member stated that the City should evaluate apartments in the City, since it does not seem like there is a good plan to allow them. They did have questions about the detached garage spaces and asked why underground parking was not considered. The applicant states that he would like to have lower rent prices and underground parking is a large cost for construction. The EDA did not comment on the overall site plan, but said it needed more work. 2. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: The applicant, Summit Management LLC, is proposing to construct a 90-unit apartment complex on the west side of a 12.96-acre property, of which 7.75 acres are buildable. The property is located to the south of Rosemary Way N and north of Frenchman Road/CSAH 8, west of Festival Foods. The property is bisected diagonally by a 50-foot wide utility transmission line easement. The applicant is requesting review and comments on a sketch plan for development of the property with an apartment use, where current zoning and land use is commercial. 1 Rosemary Place Sketch Plan A sketch plan is a way for an applicant to get feedback and unbinding comments on the plan, prior to formal submittal for approval. 3. CONCEPT PLAN: Current Zoning The property is currently zoned General Business district(C-2). The C-2 zoning district is designed to provide commercial services which are oriented toward motorists and require visibility from major roads and high volumes of traffic. Current Land Use The property is guided for Commercial (COM)use in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The Commercial land use designation provides for commercial, office and retail uses generally concentrated along key transportation corridors. General Layout The applicant is showing a proposed 90-unit, 3-story apartment building to be developed in the northwest corner of the parcel. The development would be roughly across from the existing Rosemary Apartments located at 4628 Rosemary Way N. Access to the development would be from Rosemary Way at the northwest and northeast corners of the proposed parking lot. Parking for residents would be provided through a combination of 70 detached garage stalls and 170 surface parking spaces. The proposed apartment building is set on roughly a third of the entire property. The utility easement splits this western third of the property from the remaining eastern two thirds, which have a substantial amount of wetland coverage. Staff did not comprehensively review the site plan as it relates to the City Code or the orientation of the buildings, parking lots, or detached garaged. However, it is in staff s opinion that the site plan could use revisions to blend in with the surrounding areas, including better locations for the detached garages. The applicant wanted to have a high level discussion with the Planning Commission on the zoning and land use. Compliance with City Code and Comprehensive Plan Although the property is guided for Commercial (COM)use in the 2040 Land Use plan, the developer intends to create a multi-family residential use. The applicant has stated that the current plan for the remaining portion of the property is to be extra land for resident walking trails and pet walking areas. However, the applicant has stated that the easterly portion of the property could be used as a commercial lot should the EDA seek additional commercial 2 Rosemary Place Sketch Plan development. With the development of a residential use on this property, a zoning amendment and comprehensive plan amendment would be required. The property would need to be rezoned to the Medium-density multiple family residential district(R-5), and the land use plan would need to be amended to guide the property for high density residential (HD). The R-5 zoning district allows for a maximum density of 10 units per buildable acre, and 12 units per buildable acre with a PUD. With the current buildable acreage of 7.75 acres, the applicant could feasibly develop an apartment building with 77 units. However, the applicant is proposing to create more buildable acreage by filling wetlands on the western portion of the property, and including a pond which sits on formerly buildable land to create a new total of just under 9 buildable acres, allowing for the proposed 90 units. It is unlikely that the amount of wetland fill and impact would be approved by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP). If the plan incorporated commercial uses on the remaining portion of the property, the applicant would need to apply for a PUD and for a Comprehensive Plan amendment to the Mixed-Use (MIX) land use designation. PUDs offer flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of most normal zoning district standards. The use of PUD zoning can allow for a greater variety of uses. In exchange for this flexibility, the City has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality and more sensitive proposal than would have been the case with the use of other, more standard zoning districts. PUD approval may be granted if the applicant can demonstrate compliance with the following criteria: 1. The establishment of PUD zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations, to create or maintain a development pattern that complies with the City's comprehensive plan. 2. The mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land uses could not otherwise be accomplished. 3. Variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in this chapter in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements (e.g., construction materials, landscaping, lighting, open space, etc.) that exceed the City's standards to offset the effect of any variations. 4. A more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the City. 5. Preservation and enhancement of natural features and open spaces, including but not limited to the width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas, development of buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint facilities and utilities. 6. Maintenance or improvement for the efficiency of public streets and utilities. 7. Establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. It is unclear how the proposed plan would meet the PUD criteria, and the proposed plan would likely change significantly with a PUD application. The applicant has stated that previous attempts of commercial development on the property have not been successful, and that the portion of more buildable property where the apartment is proposed to be located, facing Rosemary Way, is more viable for residential development than 3 Rosemary Place Sketch Plan commercial. Neighboring properties to the south that are similarly zoned and guided for commercial use are currently occupied by commercial uses, generally following the spirit and intent of the land use designation to provide commercial uses along CSAH 8. If the proposed residential building were constructed on the northerly edge of the property facing Rosemary Way, the commercial uses along CSAH 8 would remain. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission discuss the potential for changing the zoning and land use designation of the property to allow for high density residential use, and whether the applicant should implement a PUD with commercial uses alongside the proposed residential use. Architecture The applicant has indicated that the design of the building would be similar to one of their existing developments in Forest Lake. The exterior of the building is proposed to be a mixture of brick and steel siding with earth tone colors. The individual apartments would feature decks and window shutters. The building would need to meet the city's Multifamily Design Guidelines. The applicant has provided photos of their comparison property in Forest Lake for a visual representation of the architecture of the building. Parks/Trails Park Dedication The developer is required to dedicate land,pay a fee, or a combination of land and fee. At the maximum allowed density of 10 units per acre, the developer is required to 17 percent of buildable acreage. The park dedication fee is $3,400 per unit. The applicant has not made their intentions for meeting park dedication requirements clear at this time. The sketch plan shows a playground and courtyard attached to the building,but it is unclear whether these would be public or used as private amenities for residents. The applicant is currently planning to incorporate walking trails within the remainder of the property to the east of the utility easement. If this area would be incorporated into the city park system, then 1.3 acres of buildable land would need to be used in order to meet the required 17 percent of buildable acreage for park dedication. However, the applicant's narrative seems to suggest that the trail area would be kept private as a resident amenity. Changes in zoning and land use for this property would need to be evaluated by the Parks Commission for an assessment of the park system in the area and recommendations for park dedication for this property. Streets and Access The applicant's sketch plan currently shows two access points onto the property on the northwest and northeast corner of the parking lot onto Rosemary Way. A traffic engineer may need to review the proposed access points to understand if Rosemary Way can handle the proposed traffic. Rosemary Way is a collector road and presumably can handle the additional traffic, since 4 Rosemary Place Sketch Plan high traffic is anticipated for collector roads. If the applicant were to develop a PUD with commercial uses in the remaining portion of the property, additional points of access will need to be provided. Stormwater Management The applicant has not provided plans for stormwater management or water reuse. The applicant will need to develop a stormwater management plan that meets drainage requirements. This will impact the areas that can be used for buildings and development. Utilities The property is served by city sewer and water. The sewer and water system can handle the proposed land use changes. 4. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATIONS: Due to constraints on the property such as existing wetlands that are proposed to be filled, it is not certain what the total buildable area will be in the plan review process. It is unclear in the sketch plan whether the applicant would be willing to move forward building fewer units than what is proposed in order to satisfy density requirements. Staff understands that previous attempts to market for commercial uses on this specific property have been unsuccessful. Further, the adjacent properties immediately to the south are fulfilling the vision of a strong commercial corridor along CSAH 8. Staff recommends discussion on the following: • Rezoning and re-designating the use of the property to allow for high density residential, moving away from the original plan for commercial use on the property. • Creating a true mixed-use PUD with residential and commercial uses The applicant is requesting review and comments on a sketch plan for the properties showing the 90 unit apartment building. The applicant would like comments on the following: • Whether residential use would be possible considering current zoning and land use designation. • The use of the east end of the property for commercial PUD versus the planned recreation and walking space. • Whether the plan should incorporate commercial development ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 5 Rosemary Place Sketch Plan 2. Existing Zoning Map 3. Existing 2040 Land Use Map 4. Applicants Narrative Dated October 12, 2022 5. Applicants Sketch Plan 6 Rosemary Place Sketch Plan oo ke AZT- e ' n J ' r i- ,y�91fy� �P1d �=7 r.7 , f aC. Parcel Boundary selection Site Roads _I Hugo BorderAo 40111 h. Parcel Boundary N CITY OF Rosemary Place 0 100 Location Map EIr=Feet Hugo, MN 1 in=333 feet HUGOEST. 1906 -�� Rosemary Place Existing Zoning Hugo, MN Subject Parcel Right of Way Roads Parcel Boundary .— Zoning Districts (LA)Long Term Agricultural (AG)Agricultural (RR)Rural Residential (R-1)Large Lot Single Family Residential (R-3)Single Family Detached Residential �•.. (CR-3)Central Residential (R-4)Low Density Multiple Family Residential (R-5)Medium Density Multiple Family Residential (NIS)Neighborhood Service (RC-1)Restricted Commercial (C-1)Central Business (C-2)General Business _(FCB)Future Central 9 � Business (BP)Business Park (RI-1)Restricted Industrial (1-3)General Industrial (FUS)Future Urban Service (PUD)Planned Unit Development Water N V Site �� a 0 500 Feet 1 in=500 feet CITY OF Rosemary Place 2040 Land Use Map Hugo, MN s z GSubject Parcel ,-.. —Right of Way s —Roads pParcel Boundary LandUse =Agricultural (AG) Large Lot Residential (ILL) k Very Low Density } (VLD) C Low Density Residential - (LD) Medium Density Residential (MD) _High Density Residential (HD) 0 Business Park (BP) =Commercial (COM) =Industrial (IND) Mixed Use (MIX r Public/Quasi-Public (PQ) Site - -- 0 500 Feet 1 in=500 feet Rosemary Place Proiect Narrative Summit Management, the Applicant, is a renowned property management and development firm that owns and operates several properties throughout the state of Minnesota. With over 30 years of experience developing multi-family properties, Summit Management has a proven track record in building and professionally managing high quality housing. Summit serves thousands of residents annually, and prides itself on providing exceptional management services and outstanding properties and amenities. Summit Management is proud to be a current,active member of the City of Hugo through its Hugo Estates Community and looks forward to participating in the growth of the City through the new Rosemary Place development. The proposed Rosemary Place project will bring in a vibrant multi-family presence, consisting of a state of the art 90-unit, three story apartment building. The proposed location is currently a vacant, commercially zoned lot. Summit Management plans to build 90 multi-family units at a density of 10 units per buildable acre (see Site Plan, attached as Exhibit A for notes and calculations). The Applicant would like to note that it does have a possible commercial PUD lot remaining on the East side of the property, which could be used if the EDA is seeking additional commercial development. Otherwise,the current planned use for that lot is extra land for a resident pet walk and/or walking trail. The building will be designed similarly to Summit Management's Arbor Ridge Luxury Apartments in Forest Lake (see Exhibit B). The exterior materials of the apartment building will be a mixture of brick, steel siding, trim and window shutters, with decks and screening incorporated around the entire building. The colors will consist of earth tones that complement the palette of the surrounding neighborhood. Some of the proposed uses and amenities of the 90-unit apartment building include the following: • Spacious, bright apartments • Full kitchens with all appliances in every unit • Washer and dryer in every unit • Maintenance of apartments, common spaces and all appliances • High speed internet • Utilities including gas, electric, water, waste and recycling • Individual climate control in every apartment • Community Room • Exercise Room • Outdoor patio with grills and lounge space • Outdoor fitness area Summit Management looks forward to bringing this project to the City of Hugo and fulfilling its continued commitment to providing outstanding properties and amenities for its residents. Page 1 of 6 Exhibit A Rosemary Place Plan 13 PQSSME Pud 11 ATE PLAN rim � or fC&a* J�Ar 7 Page 2 of 6 Exhibit B REPRESENTATIVE PHOTOS � � lllllll) lfl�l J 1) d. �� ll }i 1 ��� pilllllllll �Illl�l lNII 9,. �� Illlllllllllll f� 4 r �iFO I:_ ���Ill II1 llll I ° *Note:All photos contained in this EXHIBIT B are of Arbor Ridge Luxury Apartments, 1700 81 St SE,Forest Lake,MN 55025. Page 3 of 6 C f rr LL �_I - � � i L ��[ _ � � �� �.... li it it• � � t +` " JY �* 1 F � r - _ _ ■ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII' ■■ ��- IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII� ■ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII ■■ ■■ IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIVII� C:- ME i IIIIIIIIII�III�II� �� ■� OWT _ u man f - 'o ■ ■ ■ ®ma® - MEN k 4 Page 5 of 6 w � i f 1 � 1�iiNi� Page 6 of 6 L U ®®®®® fa 93 fo a ®®®® O� �L U VON N N �4 H � ca u9 cc o MO .' .�+ aQ — L ` POND CALCULATIONS cU = U "' EXISTING POND = 28,050 SF > I —o % QL p u WETLAND CALCULATIONS \ A S 3 L WETLAND-3 = 5,314 SF F . WETLAND-5 = 3,139 SF I i EXISTING POND 0 p U ❑ WETLAND-6 = 5,479 SF Q a \ E� �O p AL N ❑ WETLAND-7 = 10,366 SF C _ �. �Q _ SE _ mAM TECT ALt EXISTING BUILDABLE AREA = o I Q 337,736 SF (7.75 ACRES) ROSEMARY WAY N 0 3 TOTAL EXISTING POND I B�I�DI (PUBLIC ROAD) = 28,050 SF I o N�s�jegc TOTAL PROPOSED FILLED I _ CCES E t > F --ol 41 - _ \ a a WETLAND = 24,298 SF ��_ Lu NEW BUILDABLE AREA = 3 ---- - -PLAY _ _ 390,084 SF 8.95 ACRES v z ( ) I GROUND I 3 /'OS� /'� --- vs °' " TARGET PROPOSED FILLED L I ° a WETLAND = 54,304 SF I TARGET BUILDABLE AREA REF, PGA �� `' y H = 392,040 SF (9 ACRES) I _ _ COURT F�Q�'��o AL ° "� o z YARD I 4 �a v — 0 vi J.,o I Z I yh1 35,�' ,'' y . v ADDITIONAL WETLAND M ' 34 aLu CALCULATIONS ' •'-� �oe�� ,- ,- POSSIBLE PUD . I� WETLAND-3 = 2,037 SF N o TOTAL PROPOSED FILLED WETLAND & EXISTING POND Lu = 54,385 SF ' g P����S�P� PG�FO .'�`' .''i i 66 0 Lu NEW BUILDABLE AREA2a s� 392,121 SF (9 ACRES) N I REF. �,GPS 11lL I ,/ ,/�gQ���Q /' I �I • . o ° s I' AIL30' I I -0 BUl( 93 DING A - FL � I �IIIL �IIL — 11 2° b / / �Illc 83 fit? >U WETLAND-2 � too N 41 AL N w� SITE PLAN • a� SCALE: 1:30 ` z q LJ 22 , � m A L z ULLI a LLJ� L u- AIL =3 / AL 0 W Lu o W UU ' SITE PLAN SCALE: 1" = 60'-0'' AL I AL wq Sy AL AL _ / TON Ovn/ T WETLAND-1 i / � Vv / Y EXISTING POND � N AL AL AL LLJ .-' R/GNr � AL FRENC � NM,q N op ... \ AL ROAD q �, P / �►` �1� �P5CI, o (C. S. N q T �Z�1 WETLAND-2 z y No No. ]WL N g) 4S AL L 83 AL 0 0 N roet N . AL 0 2 42 N `" I isue De to w - J oc m nt set: relimiriar laos N of fo7 C st uction N I rn 0 w 0 J !Z