HomeMy WebLinkAboutEDA Packet 09.20.22If you need accommodations for the EDA meeting please contact
Rachel Juba at (651) 762-6304 or rjuba@ci.hugo.mn.us, thank you.
Agenda
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA)
Tuesday, September 20, 2022
Hugo City Hall
5:30 PM
5:30 pm 1. Call to Order
5:31 pm 2. Roll Call
(Arcand, Chrun, Denaway, Gallivan, Klein, Puleo, Roberts, Weidt)
5:32 pm 3. Approval of Minutes
EDA Meeting of June 21, 2022
5:35 pm 4. Update and Discussion on Downtown Hugo Project
• Denny Trooien, Dennis Properties, LLC
6:00 pm 5. Discussion on Banners along Frenchman Road/CSAH 8
6:15 pm 6. Sponsorship Request from Hugo Area Business Association for
Kidz n’ Biz Fest
6:30 pm 7. Adjournment
If you need accommodations for the EDA meeting please contact
Rachel Juba at (651) 762-6304 or rjuba@ci.hugo.mn.us, thank you.
Background memo for the EDA Meeting of Tuesday, September 20, 2022
3. Approval of Minutes
Staff recommends approval of the minutes from the June 21, 2022 EDA Meeting as presented.
4. Update and Discussion on Downtown Hugo Project
At its Thursday, September 8, 2022, meeting the Planning Commission held a public hearing on
the preliminary plat and planned unit development general plan applications for the Downtown
Hugo project. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the
applications to the City Council. In the packet are the plans and comment letters from the DNR
and MnDOT. Staff will provide a short presentation on the plans
Mr. Trooien would also like to address the EDA about other items with the project that he
would like the EDA to consider. This includes the introduction of cost sharing on certain items
related to the development.
Staff recommends the EDA review the plans and make a recommendation to the City Council.
Staff recommends the EDA consider Mr. Trooien’s items for cost share and provide direction to
staff.
5. Discussion on Banners along Frenchman Road/CSAH 8
In 2016, the EDA recommended approval of banner designs to the City Council. The banners
were ordered and put along Frenchman Road that same year. Banners usually last about 5
years before they need to be replaced. It is in staff’s opinion that the general design is good, but
could use an upgrade. Staff has provided new banner designs for the EDA to consider. The 2022
budget includes money for banner replacement. Attached in the packet are the existing design
and updated designs for consideration. Staff recommends the EDA provide a recommendation
on the banner designs.
6. Sponsorship Request from Hugo Area Business Association for Kidz n’ Biz Fest
On September 24, 2022, the annual Kidz ‘N Biz will take place at Oneka Elementary School. This
annual event is an opportunity for the HBA to directly connect with the Hugo families and
children in a PTA carnival atmosphere. This event is expected to attract more than 500 Hugo
children and their families and will feature an assortment of games and entertainment presented
by Hugo businesses. In previous years the EDA sponsored the event in the amount of $750. The
HBA is asking for the EDA to sponsor in that same amount again this year.
MINUTES FOR THE EDA MEETING OF JUNE 21, 2022
Vice Chair Klein called the meeting to order at 5:30pm.
PRESENT: Gallivan, Denaway, Klein, and Puleo
ABSENT: Arcand, Chrun, Roberts, and Weidt
STAFF: Bryan Bear, City Administrator
APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR THE EDA MEETING OF MAY 17, 2022
Commissioner Puleo made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Gallivan, to approve the May 17,
2022 EDA meeting minutes.
Ayes: All.
Nay: None.
Motion carried.
UPDATE ON WASHINGTON COUNTY CDA AND OPEN TO BUSINESS PROGRAM
Commissioner Klein invited Washington County Economic Development Director Chris Eng to provide an
update on Economic Development activities. Eng highlighted the two main challenges impacting
businesses at this time as supply chain issues, and lack of available talent. Businesses are not in the need
of grant programs as of now. Eng stressed the importance of small businesses to the county, as there are
18,000 of them located in Washington County. 95% of businesses have less than 50 employees. Eng
outlined a new program called the “What’s Next CEO Program,” which is a networking service among area
CEO’s, facilitating a way for peer to peer assistance among CEO’s to help each other solve problems and to
advise each other. The County will support the program with needed services. Eng discussed the lack of
talent as a concern. The County is marketing its amenities to both businesses and workers. Eng talked
about programs being offered by various school districts to train students for the work force, highlighting a
successful program in Forest Lake. The County is also marketing and promoting land and is cooperating
with the MN Technology Corridor. Eng encouraged the City to apply for available predevelopment grant
funds and noted the availability of EPA funding for contamination testing and related environmental
studies. Eng said that over 6 million square feet of industrial warehousing space is under development in
the County, but retail, office and manufacturing development has been slow. Eng thanked Rachel Juba
and staff for participation in the Economic Development Summits, the EDA advisory working group and for
providing ongoing support.
Tyler Hilsabeck with the Open to Business Program said the program has been in place for 5 years. The
two main roles for the program include business coaching and lending to small businesses. Tyler discussed
how each program functions, and supplied the EDA with examples and statistics concerning work that has
occurred in Hugo. Clients of the program can either be Hugo-based businesses or Hugo residents.
Eng and Hilabeck answered questions about the business environment and how to get the word out to
area businesses about the open to business program. Hisabeck appreciated the relationship with Hugo,
mentioning his office hours at City Hall, and city staff’s referral of clients to him. Hilsabeck also receives
referrals from area bankers.
Commissioner Klein invited County Commissioner Fran Miron to speak. Miron discussed the history of the
County’s EDA program and the county’s desire with this program to expand the county’s economic
development focus beyond infrastructure construction. He discussed the importance of assistance
provided during COVID. Miron talked about the worker shortage as a key issue, and how it contributes to
the supply chain shortages. Miron mentioned that the Hugo and the County have a lot to offer right now,
as both businesses and residents look to relocate into the suburbs. He mentioned that people want to live
and work here, as they recognize the quality of life and area amenities.
UPDATE ON DOWNTOWN DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
Staff provided an update on the new North Star Elementary School, 152nd Street intersection
improvement, Lions Park, the FCB zoning District, the Lake Area Bank concept plan, and construction
in the Bald Eagle Industrial Park.
ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Puleo made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Gallivan, to adjourn at 6:45 pm.
Ayes: All.
Nay: None.
Motion Carried.
Respectfully submitted.
Bryan Bear, City Administrator
Agenda Number 4
CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION
STAFF REPORT
TO: Hugo EDA
FROM: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director
SUBJECT: Dennis Properties LLC – “Downtown Hugo” Preliminary Plat and
Planned Unit Development (PUD) General Plan
DATE: September 16, 2022, for the EDA Meeting of September 20, 2022
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN: Mixed-Use (MIX)
ZONING: Central Business (C-1)
REVIEW DEADLINE (120-days): December 1, 2022
1.DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST:
The applicant is requesting approval of a preliminary plat and planned unit development (PUD)
to subdivide and master plan the property to allow 5 buildings for a total of approximately 63,000
square feet. The PUD general plan is proposed for the entire 4.2 acres of the property and is will
replace the previous PUD General Plan that was approved in 2020. The property is located on the
east side of Highway 61 in downtown along Egg Lake. The property includes wetlands along the
lake for a total of 4 buildable acres. The property is currently owned by the City of Hugo and the
applicant has a purchase agreement to purchase the property in phases.
The PUD General Plan includes 5 buildings totaling 63,000 square feet, which includes 24,732
square feet for a second story’s of a couple buildings. The mix of uses are restaurants (18,000
square feet), retail (25,000 square feet), and office (20,000). The plan includes a downtown main
street concept, promenade in the center, and a waterfront boardwalk intended to give residents
and guests views of Egg Lake. The preliminary plat includes four lots that will generally have a
building on each lot with cross access and parking agreements. A property owners association
will be required to be created to maintain the private drives, landscaping, lighting, and other
common areas.
Page 2
2
The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility on the following:
•Shoreland ordinance regulations
o Minimum Building setback from ordinary high water (OHW) level of Egg Lake
o Maximum impervious surface
o Maximum Dock size over the OHW level of Egg Lake
o Maximum building height
•Parking regulations
o Minimum parking requirements
•Minimum rear yard setback requirement
In exchange for this flexibility, the developer is:
•Landscape plan and exceeds ordinance standards
•Design standards and architecture that exceeds ordinance standards
•Creating a main street atmosphere in the Central Business District
•Public access to Egg Lake
2.LEVEL OF DISCRETION IN DECISION-MAKING
The City has relatively high level of discretion in approving a PUD. A PUD must be consistent
with the City’s comprehensive plan. The City may impose reasonable requirements in a PUD not
otherwise required if the City deems it necessary to promote the general health, safety, and
welfare of the community.
The City’s discretion in approving or denying a preliminary plat is limited to whether or not the
proposed plat meets the standards outlined in the subdivision regulations in the City Code. If it
meets these standards, the City must approve the preliminary plat.
3.CONTEXT:
A.Surrounding Land Use and Zoning
The properties to the north is zoned Central Business (C-1) and Central Residential (CR-3) and is
and are occupied with single family homes. The property to the east is occupied by Egg Lake.
The property to the south is zoned Central Business (C-1) and is occupied by the Dominos Pizza
Building. The property to the west across Highway 61 is zoned Central Business (C-1) and is
occupied by the Hugo Feed Mill, single family home, and City Hall. All of the properties
surrounding the property are classified as Mixed-Use (MIX) on the 2040 Comprehensive Plan
and are in the downtown plan.
Page 3
3
B. Natural Characteristics of Site
The site is vacant and generally flat. There are existing mature trees on the property. The site is
adjacent to Egg Lake and there are wetlands between the property and Egg Lake.
4. ANALYSIS:
A. Planned Unit Development (PUD)
The use of the PUD zoning allows the developer zoning ordinance flexibility to create a master
planned development. The PUD zoning is tied to a specific PUD general plan that is proposed
with this application.
The applicant is requesting approval of a PUD for the development. PUD’s offer enhanced
flexibility to develop a site through the relaxation of zoning district standards. The use of the
PUD zoning also allows for a greater variety of uses, internal transfers of density, construction
phasing and a potential for lower development costs. In exchange for this enhanced flexibility,
the city has the expectation that the development plan will result in a significantly higher quality
proposal than would have been the case with the use of other, more standard zoning districts.
In exchange for this flexibility, the developer is:
• Landscape plan and exceeds ordinance standards
• Design standards and architecture that exceeds ordinance standards
• Creating a main street atmosphere in the Central Business District
• Public access to Egg Lake
Staff believes that the layout of the proposed PUD general plan exceeds the City’s standards for
commercial developments. The applicant has offered a more creative and efficient approach to
the master plan which could not be achieved without the flexibility. The plan also meets the
downtown plan and design guidelines.
In order to approve a PUD, the City must find that the applicant has demonstrated compliance
with the following criteria:
1. Provide for the establishment of PUD zoning districts in appropriate setting and
situations, to create and maintain a development pattern that complies with the City’s
Comprehensive Plan.
2. Allow for the mixing of land uses within a development when such mixing of land
uses could not otherwise be accomplished.
3. Provide for variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in order to
improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design
elements that exceed the City’s standards to offset the effect of any variations.
Page 4
4
4. Promote a more creative and efficient approach to land use within the City, while at
the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics,
economic viability and general welfare of the City.
5. Preserve and enhance natural features and open spaces including but not limited to the
width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas, development
of buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint facilities and
utilities.
6. Maintain or improve the efficiency of public streets and utilities.
7. Ensure the establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses.
The 2040 Comprehensive Plan shows the land use being Mixed-Use (MIX). The rezoning/PUD
is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in terms of land use. It is in staff’s opinion that the
PUD general plan has offered a creative and efficient method to planning the site, all which
meets the intent of the PUD ordinance.
Setbacks
Buildings in the Central Business (C-1) district are required to meet the minimum setback
standards of 10 feet from the front property line, 30 feet from the rear property line, and zero feet
from the side property lines. The applicant is requesting flexibility for the buildings and
deck/boardwalk to be 0 feet from the rear property line.
Since the property abuts Egg Lake it is also in the Shoreland District that has minimum setbacks
from the ordinary high water (OHW) level of the lake. The applicant is requesting flexibility for
the deck/boardwalk to be 0 feet from the OHW of the lake. The Technical Evaluation Panel
(TEP) has approved the deck/boardwalk location with a no-loss determination for impacts.
Staff is comfortable with this request for flexibility from the shoreland setback requirements. The
property is unique because it is a long and narrow piece between Egg Lake and HWY 61. It is
limited on what they can do with the property. The property was previously occupied with
buildings and parking lots that did not meet the shoreland setback requirement. There are
expansion plans along Highway 61 that the applicant has taken into account. They will be
required to dedicate additional right-of-way with the development along the front property line,
which makes the property even smaller. The downtown plan also shows a restaurant building
along the lake to take advantage of the views across the lake.
Building Setbacks Related to the Downtown Design Guidelines
The downtown design guidelines state that buildings in this area should be oriented to the street
with fully articulated street facades (doors and windows) based on traditional downtown
storefronts. The downtown plan shows the buildings abutting Highway 61 and parking lots in
Page 5
5
back by Egg Lake. It also show a buildings pushed back towards Egg Lake and limited
commercial buildings along Highway 61. The plan shows the development that creates a “main
street” like a traditional downtown. The applicant has stated they would like to create a
destination retail and restaurant project where the uses support each other. To create the
traditional downtown feel, the some buildings get pushed towards Egg Lake.
Staff is comfortable with the location of the buildings being towards Egg Lake since downtown
design guidelines highly encourage the development of a traditional downtown. The proposed
restaurants then can take advantage of the views of the lake on the east side of the building that
includes most of the dining area and a deck.
The layout of the property is different than what is shown on the downtown plan. The downtown
plan is simply a guide to show how the area could be development and it is not a plan to dictate
the exact placement of buildings or parking lots. The area proposed to be developed shows a park
area. Several years ago the Parks Commission discussed this and stated that as long as there are
active areas along the lake a park is not needed. They stated that Lions Park serves this area and
would rather see a trail along the lake as shown the Comprehensive Plan.
Building Coverage and Lot Coverage
The ordinance limits lot area to be covered by a building to 60% and lot area to be covered by
impervious surface to 90%. The proposed site plan complies with the coverage requirements.
The applicant also meets the shoreland impervious surface requirements for the development.
The applicant is proposing the following:
Shoreland Required Proposed
Maximum Impervious 25% 46%
Density
The maximum development density for a PUD in the Central Business (C-1) zoning district is 60
units per 1 acre. The applicant is not proposing any residential units at this time.
Development Phasing
The applicant is showing the development completed in 2 phases. However, with discussions
with the applicant, the phasing plan could change overtime due to market conditions. The
applicant is proposing the restaurant building on the Lot 1, Block 1 as the first phase/building of
the project. The applicant has stated that everything will be built as shown in the first phase
except the SW building. That area will be green space until the building is built. All of the 118
parking spaces shall be completed.
The phasing plan does not indicate the amount of property that will be conveyed to the applicant
with the purchase agreement.
Page 6
6
Parking
The Comprehensive Land Use Regulations state that a restaurant user shall have 1 parking space
per 3 seats for restaurants and events centers, based on capacity. There shall be 1 parking space
per 250 square feet of building for retail buildings. There shall be 1 parking space per 200 square
feet of office. The table below is for the full build-out of the PUD.
Square Feet per Use Required Proposed
Restaurant 18,000 square
feet (540) seats
180
Retail 25,000 square feet 100
Office 20,000 100
Total 380 245
The applicant is requesting flexibility to allow a reduction in the parking spaces because of the
proposed shared parking for the development. This is consistent with the downtown design
guidelines which encourages businesses to establish or participate in providing shared parking
with reductions in required on-site parking. However, staff has been working with the applicant
on the number of parking stalls that would be adequate for the development and it is in staff’s
opinion that there is a shortage of parking for the full build out of the development. Since the
project is proposed in phases, the parking space requirements shall be further evaluated with each
phase of the development based on use. This may mean a reduction is square footage of
buildings, change in use by demand, or additional parking constructed.
The applicant will be required to record a shared parking and maintenance agreement benefiting
all of the properties in the PUD.
Streets and Access
The overall PUD plan shows a full access across from 146th Street into the site. No other access
is proposed at this time.
An additional 8 feet of right-of-way shall be dedicated for Highway 61. MNDOT is reviewing the
plans and will provide a comment letter for any required public improvements. All required
improvements shall be coordinated with, permitted, and approved by MNDOT.
Landscaping
Based on the type and size of the proposed restaurant building and the dimensions of the site, the
landscaping plan should include a minimum of 23 deciduous shade trees, 19 coniferous trees, and
19 ornamental, and 127 shrubs. The applicant’s landscape plan not only meets all of the City’s
landscape requirements for a commercial use but exceeds the requirements. The landscaping
surrounds the building with perennials and has trees and shrubs located within the parking lot in
Page 7
7
the islands and promenade central gathering area. There is a row of shrubs that are lined along
Highway 61 that provides a nice buffer between the sidewalk and parking lot. There is also an
evenly spaced row of trees proposed for the area along Highway 61. The remaining greenspace
on the property will be sod.
The downtown design guidelines state where parking is located along the street, it should be
landscaped and screened with a combination of fencing or wall plantings along the street edge.
The applicant has done a good job of creating a wall edge of shrubs and trees along the road, it
also created a landscaped edge between the sidewalk and the parking lot. The applicant is also
proposing decorative lighting along within the development.
Sidewalks and Trials
The downtown design guidelines promote a pedestrian friendly downtown area. The plan does
create a pedestrian friendly atmosphere by connecting the sidewalk along Highway 61 to a
proposed promenade and boardwalk along the lake.
Although the boardwalk and decking areas will be privately owned and used in connection with
restaurants and other buildings within the development, the applicant does want portions of the
waterfront to be accessible to the public.
The docks will need to be reviewed and approved by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) and
the MnDNR. The applicant is requesting PUD flexibility for the dock construction regulations
for the shoreland overlay district, however, until the dock is reviewed and approved by the
MnDNR staff is unsure what the dimensions will be approved. The applicant will be required to
obtain a permit of MNDNR prior to installation.
Lighting
The applicant has submitted a full lighting plan that includes decorative lighting for the site and
the building. The final lighting plans shall be submitted to the City for review and approval by
staff.
Architecture and Building Materials
The downtown design guidelines encourage new buildings to be designed with elements of
traditional main street design, Hugo’s French trading post roots, or prairie style architecture.
Traditional main street style buildings usually have flat roofs with well-defined roof lines. The
French trading post architectural elements include steeper or mansard roofs, open storefronts, and
exterior plaster with stone and brick. Prairie style architecture usually has hipped roofs with low
spreading deep overhangs. Prairie style architecture also has horizontal line design elements and
uses materials that can blend in with the natural environment. The applicant has designed the
buildings to be reflective of the traditional main street style.
The applicant has provided plans that show examples of the architecture proposed for the project
and general information on building material. The building architecture will be evaluate with the
Page 8
8
PUD final plat for each phase. The buildings are designed with traditional main street design
including well defined roof lines, a mix of quality masonry materials, breaks in the building
massing, and several large windows.
The downtown design guidelines encourage four-sided architecture, using the same quality
materials on all sides. It also states that all facades shall be articulated with a variety of materials,
details, and visual interest. Roof lines and cornices shall be completed in the three dimensional
manner and the front façade shall be unique and significant to the building. It’s in staff’s opinion
that the applicant has done a good job of accomplishing these items encouraged by the downtown
design guidelines by having the materials, design elements, and windows wrap around the
building.
The applicant shall create design guidelines for the overall PUD including required building
material to be reviewed and approved by staff.
Building Height
In the Central Business (C-1) zoning district the maximum building height is 35 feet. The
building at its highest dimension is proposed to be a maximum of 35 feet and will meet the
building height regulation.
The shoreland overly district has a building height regulation of 25 feet. The applicant is
proposing flexibility to allow the buildings in the shoreland area to be 27 feet.
Screening
Staff has some concerns about the location of the trash enclosure on the north side of the
property. Staff has requested that the applicant review this location and consider another location
for the trash enclosure. The trash enclosures shall be constructed of materials consistent with the
buildings and shall be screened.
The applicant has not provide the location for ground or roof top mechanical equipment. The
equipment shall be screen from public view. This may mean, for roof top mechanical equipment,
raising parapet of the wall to screen the equipment.
Signage
Staff recommends the applicant continue to work with staff on the sign design and location. All
signage is required to have a permit and approval by the City prior to construction and
installation of the signs. Staff also recommends that development sign criteria will established for
the overall PUD.
Ponding and Stormwater Management
The stormwater water quality and rate control requirements are proposed to be met through the
use of onsite permeable pavement. The storage below the permeable pavement is sized to meet
Page 9
9
the City’s water quality and RCWD’s rate control requirements. The proposed stormwater
management meets all RCWD requirements. An operations and maintenance plan for the
permeable pavement has been included in the stormwater management plan. A stormwater
maintenance agreement will be required for the permeable pavement on the site.
Utilities
Water service to the site will be achieved by the applicant connecting to the watermain at the
south end of Fondant Avenue and looping it through the site and connecting to the existing
watermain on the east side of Highway 61.
Sanitary sewer service to the site will involve the applicant rerouting the existing sanitary sewer
mains that run from the north and south of the site and connecting to the existing sanitary sewer
manhole on the east side of Highway to accommodate the selected building locations
B.Preliminary Plat
The preliminary plat includes 4 lots. The development is proposed in phases. Lot 1, Block 1 is
proposed as the first phase and is proposed to be a restaurant. The applicant will be required to
apply for a PUD final plan and final plat for each lot in the PUD.
Park dedication is not required for commercial developments.
7.STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
It’s in staff’s opinion that the redevelopment project for Downtown Hugo is consistent with the
downtown plan and design guidelines. The applications meet the criteria for approval and are
also consistent with the downtown plan and design guidelines. Staff recommended the Planning
Commission approve the PUD and preliminary applications, subject to the conditions listed in
the resolutions.
ATTACHMENTS:
1.Location Map
2.Engineers memo dated September 1, 2022
3.DNR comment letter dated September 2, 2022
4.MnDOT comment letter September 9, 2022
5.Downtown Plan & Design Guidelines
6.Preliminary Plat and PUD Plans
7.Building Elevations
Forest Boulevard North147th Street North
Fitzgerald Avenue North146th Street North
145th Street North
Lower 147th Street North Foxhill Avenue NorthFondant Avenue NorthDowntown Hugo Project
Location Map
Hugo, MN
Site
Roads
Hugo Border
Parcel Boundary
¯Document Path: S:\Mapping\Emily\LocationSite Maps\2022\Downtown Hugo.mxd
C:\Users\rachel.juba\AppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\INetCache\Content.Outlook\O7PY7DSU\018652-000 LTR RJuba - Downtown Hugo - 2022-09-01.docx 178 E 9TH STREET | SUITE 200 | SAINT PAUL, MN | 55101 | 651.286.8450 | WSBENG.COM September 1, 2022
Ms. Rachel Juba
Community Development Director
City of Hugo
14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North
Hugo, MN 55038
Re: Site Plan Review
Downtown Hugo
WSB Project No. 018652-000
Dear Ms. Juba:
We have reviewed the site plan submittal for the proposed Downtown Hugo Site located east of
Highway 61 just north of 146th Street. In particular, we have reviewed the following plans related
to this particular request:
• Civil Plan Sheets dated 3/18/22 by SRF
• Stormwater Management Report dated 3/18/22 by SRF
Based on the review of the above documents, we offer the following comments related to this
application:
Grading, Street, and Utility Plans
1. The site is proposed to maintain the current access from Forest Boulevard/US Hwy 61 at
146th Street.
2. Any impact to traffic or the state right of way as part of construction will need to be
coordinated with, permitted, and approved by MNDOT.
3. Water service to the site will be achieved by connecting to the watermain at the south end of
Fondant Avenue and looping it through the site and connecting to the existing watermain on
the east side of Forest Boulevard/US HWY 61
4. Sanitary sewer service to the site will involve rerouting the existing sanitary sewer mains that
run from the north and south of the site and connecting to the existing sanitary sewer
manhole on the east side of Forest Boulevard/ US Hwy 61 to accommodate the selected
building locations.
5. Detailed redline comments have been provided on the plans and sent to the applicants
engineer so they can be addressed in future submittals.
6. The existing drainage and utility easement for the sanitary sewer will require vacation, with
new drainage and utility easements placed for the looped watermain and the relocated
sanitary sewer.
Ms. Rachel Juba
September 1, 2022
Page 2
Stormwater Management
7. The stormwater water quality and rate control requirements are proposed to be met through
the use of onsite permeable pavement. The storage below the permeable pavement is sized
to meet the City’s water quality and RCWD’s rate control requirements.
8. The applicant is not able to meet the 0.1 cfs/ac rate control rule due to site constraints. The
City’s rule allows for this 0.1 cfs/ac rate control requirement to be waived if the site
discharges to a water body with a large storage capacity, the volume discharged from the
project site does not contribute to downstream flood peak and there are no downstream
locations susceptible to flooding. This site has demonstrated compliance with those three
criteria and is showing a decrease in rates for all storm events this is not anticipated to have
a negative impact on Egg Lake or any downstream properties. Additionally, the discharge
volume to Egg Lake is decreased in all storm events so Egg Lake’s HWL will not increase
due to this project.
9. The proposed stormwater management meets all RCWD requirements.
10. There is not a regulated floodplain elevation set by FEMA or RCWD for Egg Lake.
11. An operations and maintenance plan for the permeable pavement has been included in the
stormwater management plan. A stormwater maintenance agreement will be required for the
permeable pavement on the site.
Wetlands
12. A Notice of Decision was issued on March 3, 2022, approving a no-loss for the project
based on plan sets submitted on November 11, 2021. The decision approved the
installation of pilings within the portion of wetland above the OHW that falls under the
jurisdiction of the wetland conservation act (WCA). No filling, draining, or excavation
within the wetland is approved.
13. A series of eight (8) conditions were applied to the WCA approval for a no-loss.
14. The plans show clearing and grubbing of trees, but this was not included in the plan set
that accompanied the application on 11/15/21. A narrative describing how this work can
be done within the context of the previously issued No-loss is required.
15. Bioroll is still shown in the wetland which would constitute fill if left in place.
16. A separate US Army Corps permit has been issued for this project. Conditions of that
permit must be followed.
17. One of the conditions of the WCA issued no-loss was to provide an existing (pre-
construction) vegetation survey. The 2022 growing season is almost over and this still
needs to be submitted.
Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. Additional comments may be
necessary following the review of the responses to these. If you have any questions, please do
not hesitate to contact me at 651-286-8463.
Sincerely,
WSB
Mark Erichson, PE
City Engineer
cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only)
Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only)
Central Region Headquarters
1200 Warner Road
Saint Paul, MN 55106
September 2, 2022
Rachel Juba, Community Development Director
City of Hugo
14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North
Hugo, MN 55038
Re: DNR Comments on the Preliminary Plat and PUD for Downtown Hugo, Parcel ID 20.031.21.24.0074, Hugo
Dear Rachel Juba,
Thank you for notifying the Department of Natural Resources (DNR) of the upcoming September 8, 2022 public hearing
on the Preliminary Plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) application for the Downtown Hugo project. I have
evaluated this application in context of the City of Hugo’s shoreland ordinance and DNR’s permitting requirements.
Shoreland Ordinance Standards
Minnesota’s shoreland management standards apply to all public waters in the state that are assigned a Shoreland
Classification, including Egg Lake. Under Minn. Stat. 103F.221 and Minn. Rules 6120.3900, cities with shorelands in their
jurisdiction are required to adopt and administer shoreland ordinances that substantially comply with the standards in
the rules. The standards are designed to accommodate development around sensitive water bodies in a sustainable way
– reducing impacts on water quality, protecting fish and wildlife habitat, and preserving the natural character of the
water body.
The submitted application proposes a commercial development on a 4.3-acre parcel riparian to Egg Lake. Egg Lake is a
shallow, approximately 150-acre Public Water Basin with a shoreland classification of Recreational Development Lake.
The PUD application requests several far-reaching deviations from key protection provisions in the City of Hugo’s
shoreland ordinance that apply to the shoreland district for Egg Lake:
• Impervious Surface Standard – Shoreland impervious surface standards are established in statewide rules and
administered through local ordinances to not only limit the rate and amount of runoff and pollutants entering
public waters, but also to provide space for natural functions such as vegetation and wildlife habitat. Hugo Code
of Ordinances, Sec. 90-137(2) states that “no more than 25% of a lot or parcel in the shoreland district may be
covered by an impervious surface.” However, as indicated in the Sheet C2.0, Overall Site Plan in the Civil Plans
dated March 18, 2022, this proposal would cover 46% (83,004 square feet or 1.9 acres) of the project area with
buildings and impermeable pavement and another 38% (68,694 square feet or 1.6 acres) with pervious
pavement, covering 84% (151,698 square feet) of the parcel with constructed hard surfaces while leaving just
16% (28,896 square feet or 0.7 acres) with a natural vegetated surface.
• Structure Setback Standard – Structure setback standards from the ordinary high water level are established in
statewide rules and administered through local ordinances to preserve a natural shoreline, to ensure an
adequate buffer between structures and public waters, to limit property damage from water level
fluctuations, and to limit the visibility of structures as viewed from the surface of public waters. Hugo Code of
Ordinances, Sec. 90-1 defines structures as “any building or appurtenance, including decks, porches, sheds,
foundations, or similar.” Just month ago, on August 1, 2022, the City of Hugo adopted an ordinance amending
Sec. 90-137(2) with a requirement for a minimum 75 feet structure setback from the ordinary high water level
(OHWL) of Recreational Development Lakes such as Egg Lake. However, Sheet C2.0, Overall Site Plan in the Civil
Plans show SE Building #1 as close as 6 feet to the OHWL, NE Building #1 as close as 18 feet to the OHWL, and NE
Building #2 as close as 13 feet to the OHWL. Moreover, the plans show decking (defined as a structure per Sec.
90-1) covering more than 10,000 square feet and extending along 500 feet of Egg Lake shoreline as close as 0
feet from the OHWL. If this application is approved, the City of Hugo would completely disregard this standard
just 1 month after adoption.
The application requests flexibility from these environmental standards under Hugo Code of Ordinances, Sec. 90-141,
Planned unit developments (PUD). DNR notes that Sec. 90-141(a)(5), Purpose and intent, requires the applicant to
demonstrate that their development plan results in “preservation and enhancement of natural features and open
spaces, including but not limited to the width expansion of greenway corridors, conservation of wooded areas,
development of buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint facilities and utilities.” This
application, however, does not include an adequate natural buffer to Egg Lake and would increase the extent of
impervious surface from pre-development conditions.
Further, DNR notes that Sec. 90-141(j)(3), Coordination with other zoning regulations, item c, requires PUDs to be
“coordinated with and in compliance with provisions of the natural environment-based regulations identified in this
Code.” Our review, however, indicates this application is not compliant with the city’s natural environment-based
regulations.
The applicant cited the City of Hugo Downtown Plan & Design Guidelines in their PUD flexibility request. DNR notes that
the Downtown Plan includes the following framework principle: “reduce the impact of development close to Egg Lake
to improve lake quality and preserve wildlife habitat.” We also note that the Open Space and Storm Water
Management Design Standards in the Downtown Plan provide an excellent illustration of a stormwater management
approach to the shoreline of Egg Lake that would provide a natural vegetative buffer to filter pollutants and provide
wildlife habitat. This application, however, is not consistent with this framework principle and design standard. Under
this proposal, the shoreline of Egg Lake would be developed with parking areas and structures as close as 0 feet from the
OHWL of Egg Lake.
Public Waters Work Permitting Requirements
Sheet C2.0, Overall Site Plan in the Civil Plans shows three docks with platforms extending beyond the ordinary high
water level (OHWL) boundary of Egg Lake that do not meet the no permit required criteria in Minn. R. 6115.0210, subp.
4(A) and DNR’s General Permit 2008-0401 for dock platforms. First, General Permit 2008-0401 allows riparian
landowners to install a single dock platform up to 170 square feet in size. The plans, however, show three dock
platforms for this single development. Second, General Permit 2008-0401 requires that a dock leading to a platform
must be 5 feet or less in width. The plans, however, show docks 8 feet in width. As shown in this application, these over-
sized docks require application for an individual DNR Public Waters Work Permit. Under DNR’s Public Waters Work Rules
(Minn. R. 6115.0150 – 6115.0280), please note the applicant must show that the project represents the minimal impact
solution to a specific need with respect to all reasonable alternatives. An 8-feet wide dock in a T-configuration, as used
at many DNR public accesses, would be a reasonable, lower impact alternative for providing the desired access to Egg
Lake. Since the proposed design is not a minimal impact solution, a DNR Public Waters Work Permit cannot be issued for
these docks as proposed.
Water Appropriation Permitting Requirements
Sheet L1.0, Overall Landscape Plan in the Civil Plans shows an irrigation pump inlet pipe in Egg Lake for landscape
irrigation. A DNR Water Appropriation Permit is required to take water from a lake, wetland, stream, or well to irrigate
landscaping if the amount of water exceeds 10,000 gallons per day, or one million gallons per year.
DNR Recommendations
Unless substantial changes are made to the submitted Preliminary Plat and PUD application to align with the city’s
shoreland ordinance standards, DNR strongly recommends denial of this application.
While DNR finds this particular development application highly problematic, we understand the city’s interest in
downtown development near Egg Lake. We have on multiple occasions encouraged city staff to develop a revised
shoreland ordinance for DNR approval that includes alternate standards for the downtown central business district. We
previously communicated to city staff as far back as February 2017 that DNR can accommodate alternate standards in
shoreland through the implementation flexibility process in Minn. R. 6120.2800, subp. 3. The implementation flexibility
process is the appropriate process under state law for communities to negotiate deviations to statewide minimum
shoreland development standards.
Sincerely,
Dan Scollan
East Metro Area Hydrologist
cc: Dan Petrik, DNR Lake & River Shoreland Program Manager
John (Jack) Gleason, DNR South District Hydrologist Supervisor
Metropolitan District
Waters Edge Building
1500 County Road B2 West
Roseville, MN 55113
An equal opportunity employer
MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113
September 9, 2022
Rachael Juba
Community Development Director
City of Hugo
14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North
Hugo, MN 55038
SUBJECT: MnDOT Review #S22-028
Downtown Hugo
NE Quad US 61 & 146th Street North
Hugo, Washington County
Dear Ms. Juba:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the plans for the Downtown Hugo development. MnDOT
has reviewed the information and has the following comments:
Traffic Impact Study (TIS):
Based on the estimated new traffic to be generated by this development, MnDOT strongly
recommends the City require a Traffic Impact Study (TIS). MnDOT’s Access Management Manual,
Chapter 5, provides guidance for creating a TIS. The manual is located at: Resources - Access
Management - MnDOT (state.mn.us) This TIS should be shared with MnDOT when completed.
Questions on this comment should be directed to Kaare Festvog, MnDOT Metro District Traffic at
kaare.festvog@state.mn.us or 651-234-7814.
Signal Operations:
The development should connect the driveway to "Fondant Ave/Lower 147th St N/Foxhill Ave" for
a secondary access. Additionally, an Intersection Control Evaluation (ICE) report will be needed to
determine if the intersection with 146th Street can remain unsignalized.
Please direct questions on these comments to Michael Fairbanks, MnDOT Metro Signal Operations,
mike.fairbanks@state.mn.us or 651-234-7819.
Signing:
The Stop sign mentioned in the plans should be a 36” x 36” Stop sign and should be installed on a
2.5” square tube as according to MnDOT standards. See
http://www.dot.state.mn.us/trafficeng/signing/plans.html for correct details, and should be mounted
with appropriate base according to surface type.
MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113
Questions on this comment should be directed to Joseph Bruer, MnDOT Metro Signs & Markings,
joseph.bruer@state.mn.us, or 651-234-7837.
Water Resources:
There is not enough information with this submittal to make a firm determination on whether a
drainage permit will be required. Any projects adjacent to MnDOT Right-of-Way or connecting to
MnDOT drainage facilities will require a MnDOT drainage permit to ensure that current drainage
rates to MnDOT right-of-way will not be increased. The drainage permit application, including the
information below, should be submitted online to: https://dotapp7.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/
The following information must be submitted with the drainage permit application:
1) A grading plan showing existing and proposed contours.
2) Drainage area maps for the proposed project showing existing and proposed drainage
areas. Any off-site areas that drain to the project area should also be included in the
drainage area maps. The direction of flow for each drainage area must be indicated by
arrows.
3) Drainage computations for pre and post construction conditions during the 2, 10, 50 and 100
year rain events.
4) Time of concentration calculations.
5) An electronic copy of any computer modeling used for the drainage computations.
6) See also the attached Drainage Permits Checklist for more information.
Once a drainage permit application is submitted, a thorough review will be completed and
additional information may be requested.
Please direct questions concerning drainage issues to Jason Swenson, MnDOT Metro Water
Resources at (651-234-7539) or Jason.Swenson@state.mn.us.
Permits:
An Access permit will be required. As stated above, a Drainage permit may be required once
additional information is provided to Water Resources. In addition, any use of, or work within or
affecting, MnDOT right of way will require a permit.
Permits can be applied for at this site: https://olpa.dot.state.mn.us/OLPA/. Please upload a copy of
this letter when applying for any permits.
Please direct questions regarding permit requirements to Buck Craig of MnDOT’s Metro Permits
Section at 651-775-0405 or Buck.Craig@state.mn.us.
Review Submittal Options
MnDOT’s goal is to complete reviews within 30 calendar days. Review materials received
electronically can be processed more rapidly. Do not submit files via a cloud service or SharePoint
link. In order of preference, review materials may be submitted as:
MnDOT Metropolitan District, Waters Edge Building, 1500 County Road B2 West, Roseville, MN 55113
1. Email documents and plans in PDF format to metrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us. Attachments
may not exceed 20 megabytes per email. Documents can be zipped as well. If multiple emails are
necessary, number each message.
2. PDF file(s) uploaded to MnDOT’s external shared internet workspace site at:
https://mft.dot.state.mn.usmetrodevreviews.dot@state.mn.us. Contact MnDOT Planning
development review staff at for uploading instructions, and send an email listing the file name(s)
after the document(s) has/have been uploaded.
If you have any questions concerning this review, please contact me at (651) 234-7797.
Sincerely,
Cameron Muhic
Senior Planner
Copy sent via E-Mail:
Buck Craig, Permits Lance Schowalter, Design
Jason Swenson, Water Resources Kaare Festvog, Traffic
Alexander Hogan, Traffic Mark Lundquist, Right-of-Way
Ryan Coddington, Area Engineer Adam Josephson, Area Manager
Joseph Zilka, MnDOT ADA Joseph Bruer, Signs and Marking
Michael Fairbanks, Signal Operations Kimberly Zlimen, Transit
Jesse Thornsen, Ped/Bike Michael Samuelson, Ped/Bike
Bethany Brandt-Sargent, Metropolitan Council Jed Hanson, Metropolitan Council
City of Hugo
Downtown
Plan
& Design
Guidelines
April 10, 2007
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 1 of 23
Credits & Acknowledgements:
We would like to thank the City of Hugo’s citizens – the residents and
business owners – who attended the workshops and meetings, sent in
their comments and gave their time to participate in the planning process.
Their input has been invaluable in developing a master plan and design
guidelines for the downtown area.
We would like to thank the City of Hugo’s City Council, Planning
Commission, City staff and consultants for leading this planning process.
Funding for development of the downtown design guidelines and the
preparation of this document was provided by a Livable Communities
Opportunity Grant from the Metropolitan Council in 2004.
City Council
Fran Miron, Mayor
Becky Petryk, Council Member Ward 1
Frank Puleo, Council Member Ward 2
Chuck Haas, Council Member Ward 3
Mike Granger, Council Member At Large
Planning Commission
Dave Schumann, Chairperson
Bronwen Kleissler
Tom Weidt
Ron McRoberts
Victoria Hoffbeck
Bob Rosenquist
Kelly Bailly
City of Hugo
Mike Ericson, City Administrator
Bryan Bear, Community Development Director
Michele Lindau, Community Development Assistant
Mary Ann Creager, City Clerk
Jay Kennedy, City Engineer (WSB)
Kendra Lindahl, City Planner (Landform)
Planning & Urban Design Consultant
Carolyn Krall, AIA
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 2 of 23
Hugo Downtown Planning Framework
Incorporated in 1906, Hugo is a rural small town with a family-oriented feel. As Hugo grew,
the intersection of Forest Boulevard (now Highway 61) and Frenchman Road (now 145th
Street) became the center of town. With a train depot and an active feed mill, this was the
ideal location for local, small businesses. A downtown neighborhood began to grow into a
comfortable, rural village. It is this small village familiarity that the residents of Hugo wish to
preserve.
Aerial Photograph of Hugo in 1974
Minnesota Historical Society
The Hugo Downtown Framework Plan and Design Guidelines are intended to provide direction
to new development in downtown Hugo and, where needed, to shape plans for
redevelopment. The Plan illustrates the type of commercial and residential development, civic
and community facilities, and amenities envisioned by the citizens of Hugo. The Plan extends
beyond the central commercial business district (CBD) to illustrate the entire downtown
commercial area of Hugo, both existing and envisioned in the future. This vision of future
development in Hugo encourages commercial growth, while seeking to concentrate that
growth, around the downtown area.
The Planning Process
The Hugo downtown plan and preliminary design guidelines were originally developed in 1998
to address redevelopment of the downtown commercial “Main Street” on Forest Boulevard
(Highway 61). But the County Road 8 improvements and rerouting required that the original
plan be revisited. The new plan was needed to address the developable area along County
Road 8 and to consider the impact of the new County Road 8 and Highway 61 intersection.
This planning process began in the fall of 2003 and included workshops with the City Council
and downtown business and property owners. A community-wide open house was held in
May 2004 to encourage public input on the final plan. In August 2004, the City was awarded
an Opportunity Grant from the Livable Communities Demonstration Account to develop design
guidelines for the downtown area to assist in implementation of the downtown plan. The
process for developing these guidelines has continued through 2005-2006 with significant
public participation in the planning process.
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 3 of 23
The Influence of Transportation Improvements
A major influence on the plan is the County’s re-alignment and improvement of County Road
8. The county’s plan will widen and reroute the road to the south, connecting to Highway 61 at
approximately 143rd Street.
The County Road 8 re-
alignment will have a
significant impact on the
downtown, offering
opportunities for growth,
improved vehicle and
pedestrian access around
the downtown area, and the
potential for redevelopment
to make improvements to
the core of the downtown
CBD and surrounding public
and civic spaces. It is vital
that the CBD not be cut off
from County Road 8 and
from the high volume of
traffic which will use this
route to access the interstate.
Highway 61 is planned to continue to run north
and south through downtown and the CBD.
Despite projections of increased traffic
volumes, this highway should not be widened
beyond four lanes except to provide for turn
movements. Instead, improvements to the
roadway and access improvements can help
accommodate the increased volumes.
The downtown plan
recommends
improvements to
improve street
access and
connectivity within
downtown, as well
as enhancements
to pedestrian
access and
walkability.
The plan also calls for extending the regional trail south across County Road 8 on the existing
railroad bed and allows for the possibility of future commuter transit within this corridor (in the
railroad ROW or on Highway 61). If Hugo is to continue to have a healthy downtown, it is
important to plan for these future transportation changes.
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 4 of 23
Defining Downtown
The downtown CBD in Hugo has always been located on Forest Boulevard (Highway 61) on
both sides of the main traffic signal at 145th Street. But over time, the commercial area has
grown and extended north and south along Highway 61, and the new development has been
less compact and more auto- or highway-oriented than the older, more traditional downtown
CBD. Without planning controls, this same pattern of commercial development could be
expected to occur along the improved and upgraded County Road 8.
While the core downtown central business district (CBD) is focused along Forest Boulevard-
Highway 61 from County Road 8 to 147th Street, the Downtown Plan extends north to the Post
Office and 150th Street, south to 140th Street, and from the shores of Egg Lake on the east to
the bend in County Road 8 to the west.
One of Hugo’s planning goals is to maintain a more compact and concentrated downtown
CBD. This goal will be achieved by encouraging new development in and around the core of
the downtown area, while planning for limited but well-ordered commercial development in
specific areas along other commercial routes such as Highway 61 and County Road 8.
Community feedback has consistently supported new CBD uses which complement downtown
(such as restaurants and entertainment) and suggest that larger, single-use development and
auto sales/service businesses, for instance, be located in commercial areas planned closer to
I-35.
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 5 of 23
To create a sense of arrival in downtown, the plan recommends placing gateway elements – a
landscaped sign, monument, or other feature – at these key entry points into downtown. While
the plan doesn’t specify the elements at each location, when you enter downtown you should
know that you are downtown. New development at these “gateway” locations should be
planned not only to allow for these gateway elements but to convey the sense of quality and
character that the downtown plan envisions.
Proposed monument sign, Nov. 29, 2004
RSP Architects for Contractor Property Development Company
The Downtown Plan
The plan is a tool to help the City of Hugo create a pedestrian-friendly downtown and
concentrates new development and redevelopment around the existing intersection of 145th
Street and Highway 61. As Hugo continues to develop, the actual projects built may differ
from the Illustrative Downtown Plan in the details of the development of any specific block or
site, but the primary elements of the plan, including the public infrastructure (roads, parks,
trails, open space) and the quality and character which makes this plan unique to Hugo are
expected to be maintained.
Gateway elements – signs, flags or
monuments – should be included in
the new downtown area to
welcome a resident or visitor into
an established and thriving
downtown. Elements depicting the
quality and character of downtown
Hugo are displayed based on the
historical and current architectural
elements of Hugo.
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 6 of 23
The Downtown Plan
City park with trails, gazebo,
dock, pedestrian bridge
Shared public parking
Carpenters on the Lake
Additional downtown
senior housing
Walkable community spaces
along trail ROW
Proposed trail connections
New mixed-use
development blending
office and multi-family
housing uses
New mixed-use
development with
housing, offices and
complementary
retail/commercial uses
Traditional
residential blocks
Improved park with future
community center
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 7 of 23
Design Guidelines
The intent of the Hugo Downtown Design Guidelines is to provide a baseline for quality in
order to revitalize and expand the downtown business district. These guidelines are written to
meet the community’s goals:
Goal 1: Preserve the rural small town character of Hugo
Goal 2: Establish a threshold or baseline for design and quality
Goal 3: Maintain a harmonious visual environment within the existing architectural context
Goal 4: Communicate the community's high expectations for new development in Hugo
Objectives
The specific objectives for downtown Hugo design guidelines are:
• To establish a clear definition of urban design standards that informs property owners,
developers, builders and decision-makers.
• To serve as a tool that planners and designers can use and incorporate into their plans
to achieve and support the City’s design objectives.
• To act as a basis for a uniform and consistent review of development and
redevelopment proposals by the City Council and Planning Commission.
The design guidelines which apply specifically to the CBD also include principles that can be
broadly applied to the entire Hugo Downtown Area.
Downtown CBD
The Design Guidelines apply specifically
to the central business district or “Old
Downtown” concentrated around Highway
61, from 147th Street to the new County
Road 8 intersection. The guidelines
provide more detailed definitions of
requirements for site planning, placement
of building mass, materials, architecture,
lighting, signage, and design of the public
realm.
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 8 of 23
Framework Principles for Downtown Hugo
1. Preserve and celebrate Hugo’s small town
character.
2. Enhance the public realm, to maintain a
pedestrian-oriented downtown.
3. Expand civic space and uses around City
Hall.
4. Add new retail which complements
existing businesses and shops and
supports downtown neighborhoods.
5. Encourage unique small businesses to
locate downtown and larger, single-use
developments closer to the I-35 corridor.
6. Provide life-cycle housing to encourage
senior-living in the downtown area.
7. Provide recreational uses for diverse age
groups in the downtown area.
8. Improve downtown access and circulation
with improvements to Highway 61 and
downtown intersections (147th, 145th,
County Road 8).
9. Reduce the impact of development close
to Egg Lake to improve lake quality and
preserve wildlife habitat.
10. Build upon unique assets such as the
church, feed mill and City Hall with
complementary design and materials.
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 9 of 23
Downtown District Design Guidelines
General Design Standards
• These design guidelines are intended to apply to the Downtown District CBD, but include
principles that can be broadly applied to the greater Hugo Downtown Area (as indicated
on the Downtown Plan), including the Central Business, Future Central Business and
Central Residential zones If the CBD development extends beyond this boundary, the
Downtown District boundaries may need to be extended accordingly.
• On all streets in the downtown district, the guidelines are intended to apply to street
frontage properties on both sides of the street.
• New downtown development shall provide for pedestrian as well as vehicular circulation
and shall create linkages to existing and proposed sidewalks and trails.
• All new development should be sensitive to existing downtown neighborhoods and
residences in the design and location of new uses and buildings with respect to shading,
views, light or noise pollution; where necessary appropriate screening or buffering shall
be provided.
• All new development shall be designed to value, respect, and preserve identified natural
features and resources.
• A sense of City history should be
encouraged, and landmarks such as St.
John’s Cemetery and St. John’s Church
should be preserved as important
contributors to Hugo’s character.
• Key points which have been identified as
primary entrances to downtown Hugo
should be designed as “gateways” to the
City; gateway elements could include
open space, unique landscaping, walls or
gates, water features and City identity signage.
These points include:
• From the west – the bend in the County Road 8 at the western edge of Hugo;
• From the east – At Egg Lake and the intersections where 147th and 140th meet
Highway 61;
• From the south – Where 140th meets Highway 61;
• From the north – Where 147th meets Highway 61.
• Along the west side of Highway 61, new downtown development will need to be designed
to integrate with the railway corridor as it comes through the center of town: as a public
open space, supporting the proposed trails, and considering future uses.
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 10 of 23
General Land Use
• Downtown development should be appropriate for a traditional downtown area: mixed-
use buildings combining retail, commercial, and residential uses, and encouragement of
multi-story buildings in the downtown.
• Neighborhood retail, service, and commercial buildings and uses which support
downtown residential neighborhoods such as drug stores, banks, and specialty markets
or small grocers are encouraged.
• Destination retail, restaurant and entertainment uses, particularly mixed with compatible,
complementary, or other synergistic uses, are highly encouraged.
• New auto-dominated commercial development such as fast food, auto service, or similar
high traffic drive-through facilities and large, single-use developments are discouraged in
the downtown CBD.
• Uses appropriate to the downtown area such as banks, coffee shops and pharmacies
which enhance their business by providing drive-through services may be permitted
provided they are designed to minimize impact on local downtown traffic circulation and
pedestrian access.
• Parking lots should only be allowed as an accessory use, except for municipal or public
district parking; larger parking areas should be broken up into smaller areas to reduce the
overall area of paving and promote a friendlier pedestrian environment.
• New residential development should provide for the full range of life-cycle housing,
offering choices of housing types (single-level flats, condominiums or lofts, single-level
and multi-story townhouses, and single-family attached or detached), styles and prices, at
a density appropriate to the downtown area.
• New residential development should be sensitive to existing residential neighborhoods
and incorporate well-designed transitions from multi-family to existing single-family
residential areas.
• Traditional neighborhood design (TND) based on a traditional street grid is a desirable
option for downtown, medium-density areas. Single-family homes (detached or attached)
or row townhomes should line the street with front porches and stoops, front yards,
sidewalks and boulevards with regularly spaced trees and street lights.
TND example with traditional street grid and
porches facing the street
Garage access at rear of house
Sidewalks and boulevards on both sides of the
street with regularly spaced street trees
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 11 of 23
• All downtown residential developments should be planned and designed to minimize
paving for driveways and surface parking. Garage-forward or “snout-house” homes or
townhomes are highly discouraged.
Streets, Public Space & Amenities
• Forest Boulevard (Highway 61) and 145th Street should be restored to be closer to their
original, traditional downtown “Main Street” form, lined with street trees and planters,
pedestrian street lights, and street furniture including benches and trash receptacles. The
fixtures that are selected for these streets should be required continuously within the
downtown CBD district and highly encouraged throughout the downtown commercial area
for visual continuity.
• Downtown intersections should be designed to be safe for pedestrians; enhancements to
safety include use of textured-colored paving or striping to mark crosswalks, narrowed or
throated intersections, pedestrian-oriented street lighting, planted center medians or
landscaped boulevards, and warning signage at busy crossings along Highway 61, such
as 147th, 145th and County Road 8.
Highly Discouraged:
Example of Garage-forward
design, dominating view
from sidewalk and street.
Change in paving or striping marks the
safe crossing zone for pedestrians at
major crosswalks.
Planted center medians or landscaped
boulevards provide resting points for
pedestrians at major crosswalks, facilitate
turning movements, and help calm traffic
speeds.
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 12 of 23
• The City street grid is a vital part of the way the downtown functions, so restoring streets
or adding new streets that connect to the existing street grid are encouraged;
disconnected streets and cul-de-sacs are highly discouraged.
• Forest Boulevard (Highway 61) and 145th Street are the original “Main Streets” of
downtown and, to an extent, the few remaining brick buildings along these streets should
be preserved, renovated, or restored to productive use; new buildings close to these older
structures warrant careful attention to design and detailing in order to relate well to the
original structures.
• The small park which is planned on Highway 61 across from City Hall is intended to act
as a Town Square or Village Green – a community focal point with passive uses (green
space, gardens, historical markers) and active uses (a gazebo, lake overlook, Farmers
Market) incorporated into the design. Civic and mixed-use buildings should be located
adjacent to the Town Square or Village Green, welcoming visitors to downtown Hugo.
• The plan proposes a future pedestrian bridge over Highway 61, connecting the park and
Egg Lake to City Hall and the bulk of the downtown area. This bridge, if well-designed,
could also act as a visual cue to drivers to reduce speed and could create a sense of
arrival and welcome for the downtown CBD.
To be safe for both pedestrians
and vehicles, downtown Hugo
should include street
improvements: narrowed
intersections, pedestrian lighting
(top left), planted medians (top
right and bottom left), and visible
signs warning of pedestrian
crossings/vehicular speed
decrease (top right).
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 13 of 23
The edge along the railroad ROW and the Hardwood Creek Regional Trail along the west side
of Highway 61 should be maintained as an open-space corridor connecting City Hall and the
CBD to new development to the south. This edge should include:
• trail connections for bicycles and winter sports uses
• landscaping to act as a year-round buffer;
• pedestrian-oriented trail and street lighting;
• places to rest with benches, planters and trash
receptacles.
• On downtown streets where retail and commercial uses are proposed, on-street parking
is encouraged; streets should be designed with the parking lane designated either by
curbing or with a change in paving materials.
• Downtown district streets should allow for public right-of-way between the curb and the
building wall, a minimum 10’-12’ wide. This area should be “zoned” to provide for street
signs, landscaping and street trees, and both street and sidewalk lighting closest to the
curb. There should be a clear pedestrian walking path in the center, and then an area
designated for seating or other street furniture (trash receptacles, bus benches, etc) and
commercial opportunities
(including newspaper boxes).
Where necessary, such as
where the street ROW does
not allow for a wider sidewalk,
these amenities may need to
be accommodated within the
parcel boundaries.
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 14 of 23
Minimum ROW
from curb to building
(10’-12’)
5’-6’ Walking Area
Defined 8’ parallel
parking lane
2’-3’ Shop related
furniture & amenities
3’ Public Area:
trash receptacles,
newspaper stands,
streetlights, signs
& street trees planted
where sidewalk widens
another option is a defined 20’
head-in angled parking zone
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 15 of 23
Architecture
• Architecture of new buildings should be respectful of the existing historical structures which
enhance the character of Hugo; design which reflects the elements of vernacular “Main
Street”, Hugo’s French trading post roots, or mid-western “prairie style” architecture is
encouraged:
Entry feature; well distinguished and covered
from the weather
Well defined roof line
1st story with glazed
display windows
Cornice or roof
line
distinguishes
1st story from
2nd story
Awnings with accent
lighting and graphics
instead of applied signs
Building base
expressed with
masonry
Early trading post and mill buildings in rural
Minnesota were often made of stone with a simple
gabled roof and expressed chimney.
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 16 of 23
Prairie Style:
roofs are hipped, low and spreading with
deep overhangs and eaves; Hugo City Hall
has many of these elements.
Traditional Main Street style building:
flat roofs, often an extended or false parapet
on “front” side or marking the main entrance.
Hugo was once a French trading
post, and many residents have
expressed a desire to reflect those
roots in the architecture of the
downtown. Appropriate
architectural elements include:
steeper or mansard roofs with
dormer windows, open storefronts
with awnings, and exterior plaster,
stone and brick.
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 17 of 23
• Architecture of new buildings should be built
upon Hugo’s existing assets such as the
church, the feed mill, and the new City Hall,
with complementary design and sense of
scale.
• Buildings should be designed to relate well to the existing natural and man-made
environment and stay within context in massing, materials, style and color; design of the
landscape and hardscape should be coordinated and harmonious with the building design
and materials.
• Buildings should be constructed and maintained for permanence and longevity; therefore
durable, maintainable materials (brick, stone, etc.) should be used; temporary buildings,
metal sheds, etc. shall not be permitted.
• Building entries should be visible from the street, well lit, covered or protected from
weather, and include significant glazing and glass doors where the public will be entering
buildings.
New “Main Street” buildings
should complement an
established downtown through
their architectural character.
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 18 of 23
• Awnings, overhangs and arcades are encouraged where pedestrians are expected to
walk and shop ; flat awnings are preferred (no barrel awnings) with adequate clearance
above sidewalk.
• Building design elements should include an expression of a building base (of brick or
stone), a middle, and a top with cornice elements at the top of the first floor and the top of
the building.
• Buildings should be designed with “four-sided architecture”, using the same quality
materials on all sides:
• all facades shall be articulated with a variety of materials, glazing, awnings, or other
details to add visual interest;
• roof lines and cornice details shall be completed in a three-dimensional manner so that
the features on the back of the roof or similar unfinished areas are not visible;
• the front façade may have a unique design or more significant glazing.
• Buildings should be oriented to the street with fully articulated street facades based on
traditional storefronts (doors and display windows) along the sidewalk.
• Zero Lot Line commercial buildings are allowed and highly encouraged on all streets
within the downtown district.
• Along CR 8 and Hwy 61, entrances may be oriented to a side or rear parking lot, as long
as the entry also has good pedestrian access and visibility from the street, and any
building wall along these streets must contain significant amounts of “real” windows.
• Equipment, mechanical systems, transformers, trash enclosures, etc. must be screened
from view in a way that is integral to the architecture of the building with similar materials:
• metal fencing or a mechanical vent screen alone is not sufficient;
• access to these service areas needs to be provided at the alley, side or rear of the
building.
Rooftop equipment shall be
screened from the line of site
of pedestrians and integrated
into the design and massing of
the roof form
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 19 of 23
Parking & Service Areas
• Within the downtown CBD, shared parking is encouraged to take advantage of varying
parking demands between mixed uses.
• Businesses are encouraged to establish or participate in a municipal parking district
providing shared, public parking with reductions in required on-site parking.
• Parking should not be located between a building and the street or main road the
building faces and be distributed around the building, especially to the side and back of
buildings.
• Parking adjacent to the street should be minimized;
• Where a parking lot is located along a street, the same zero-lot-line or setback
conditions of the adjacent buildings should be maintained with a wall, ornamental
fence, or similar landscape elements to continue the built edge along the street.
• Where a parking lot is located along a street, it should be well landscaped and
screened with a combination of fencing or wall plantings along the street edge.
Landscaped edge combines fence
with trees, low shrubs and ground
cover for parking lot screening and
buffering along the street
6’ zone between parking and
sidewalk with fence or wall
centered in zone
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 20 of 23
• Larger parking areas (over 25 vehicles) should be planned with internal landscaping,
pedestrian sidewalks or walkways and be divided into smaller areas where possible:
pedestrian walkways provided in larger parking lots should be landscaped, include
path lighting, and provide direct access for pedestrians to an entrance of a
commercial building;
walkways should be raised, paved areas or defined paths distinguished by striping
or a change in paving provided that pedestrians are kept safe from vehicular travel
on the route to an entrance of a commercial building.
Pedestrian walkways through
busy parking lots are
important because they
provide a safe, well lit, direct
access to the entrance of a
building. Larger parking lots
should have pedestrian
walkways that are clearly
identified and combined with
landscaping to break up
large areas of pavement.
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 21 of 23
• Buildings should be oriented to minimize views of service areas and loading docks
from the street; service areas should be buffered with a combination of landscaping
and screening; mechanical equipment and trash areas must be fully enclosed and
integrated into the architecture using the same materials as the building:
• metal fencing or a mechanical vent screen alone is not sufficient;
• access to these service areas needs to be provided at the alley, side or rear of the
building.
• Residential buildings (single-family homes and multi-family buildings) should be
oriented to minimize views of garages and parking areas from the street:
• free-standing or detached garages should not be allowed for multi-family
residences.
• parking should be located below buildings or underground where possible.
Below-grade parking: side or rear
access. Garages should not be as
invisible from the street as possible to
create a traditional neighborhood feel.
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 22 of 23
Signage
• Downtown signage is critical to the character of the area, especially at night; all downtown
signage is subject to careful review with the City and must comply with all zoning and
ordinance requirements for size, placement, materials, etc;
• Signage and graphics should be integral to the building architecture or used as a
decorative design element. Back-lit, box signs are not acceptable downtown.
• Decorative neon, moving or other decorative sign types are desirable only when
displayed within storefront window interiors of downtown buildings.
• Corporate chains are encouraged to customize their architecture to express their design
“brand” within a design, context, and material appropriate to the character of downtown
Hugo.
Projecting or
Hanging
Sign
Wall Sign
integrated
into the
building
design
Awning sign should be located on the
awning face or fringe
Hugo Downtown Framework Plan Final Plan & Design Guidelines
Page 23 of 23
Open Space and Storm Water Management
• New development should provide both private and public usable open space, plazas
etc; these spaces should be connected to existing or proposed trail and sidewalk
networks.
• The downtown area should plan cohesively for storm water management and for
improving the water quality of Hugo, however, where possible rain gardens or similar
infiltration and holding areas should be integrated into the design of parking areas;
design which harmonizes more groomed and landscaped areas with more natural
landscape is encouraged:
• Storm water ponds, rain gardens and other storm water management or holding areas
shall be designed to be attractive in both flooded and dry conditions; use of native
plants for filtration around pond and wetlands and other sustainable design approaches
to site and landscape design are encouraged:
More formal
and groomed
landscape
Trail or
Sidewalk
Egg Lake
Filtration
Vegetation
Swales planted as a rain garden; plants
and soil provide filtration
Trail or sidewalk
NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGEGG LAKESHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXXPRELIMINARY PLATPP1.0EGG LAKEPRELIMINARY PLAT LEGENDPROPERTY LINE - PROPOSED LOT LINEEXISTING INTERNAL LOT LINESEXISTING EASEMENTPROPOSED EASEMENTSETBACK LINE (VARIABLE, NOT SHOWN)EXISTING CONDITIONSPROPOSED CONDITIONSDENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE ANDUTILITY EASEMENT AREANUS HWY 61(FOREST BLVD N)FONDANT AVE NWASHINGTON REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY(ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD)146 THST NR.O.W. DEDICATION(8' WIDE)LOT 2BLOCK 1LOT 1BLOCK 1100.65'46.00'165.48'319.72'84.65'117.63'LOT 1 BLOCK 1LOT 2 BLOCK 1LOT 3 BLOCK 1LOT 4 BLOCK 1ROW DEDICATIONTOTAL25,718 SF60,134 SF66,163 SF28,580 SF 4,897 SF185,492 SF0.590 ACRES1.380 ACRE1.519 ACRE0.656 ACRE0.113 ACRE4.258 ACRES279.08'PROPOSED 40' WIDEDRAINAGE AND UTILITYEASEMENTPROPOSED 40' WIDEDRAINAGE AND UTILITYEASEMENTPROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTHDRAINAGE AND UTILITYEASEMENT292.61'61.34'138.81'
274.47'37.38'PROPOSED VARIABLE WIDTHDRAINAGE AND UTILITYEASEMENTLOT 3BLOCK 1125.78'14.33'THE FOLLOWING LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AS SHOWN ON SURVEY PRODUCED BY WSB AND ASSOCIATES.THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS CURRENTLY BEING REGISTERED AND THE LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS SUBJECTTO CHANGE.That part of Lots 5, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, and 16 all in COUNTY AUDITORS PLAT NO. 7, as is on file and ofrecord in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota, described as follows: Commencing atthe Northeast Corner of Government Lot 4, Section 20, Township 31, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota;thence South 89 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds West, assumed bearing along the north line thereof, 770.38 feet tothe easterly Right of Way Line of U.S. Highway No. 61; thence South 11 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds West, alongsaid easterly Right of Way Line, 1150.20 feet to the Southwest Corner of said Lot 15; thence South 78 degrees 02minutes 24 seconds East, 173.48 feet to the point of beginning of the tract to be described; thence North 11 degrees51 minutes 27 seconds East, 46.00 feet; thence North 78 degrees 09 minutes 34 seconds West, 173.48 feet to saideasterly Right of Way Line; thence North 11 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds East, along said easterly Right of WayLine, 612.17 feet; thence South 79 degrees 15 minutes 40 seconds East, 145.81 feet to the southerly extension of thewesterly line of KENNETH N. GRANGER ADDITION, as is on file and of record in the Office of the County Recorder,Washington County, Minnesota; thence North 11 degrees 13 minutes 45 seconds East, along said southerlyextension, 61.34 feet to a point distant 52.40 feet southwesterly of the Southwest Corner of Lot 2 said KENNETH N.GRANGER ADDITION; thence North 79 degrees 24 minutes 05 seconds West, 145.15 feet to said easterly Right ofWay Line; thence North 11 degrees 51 minutes 27 seconds East, along said easterly Right of Way Line, 278.07 feet;thence North 89 degrees 54 minutes 43 seconds East, 209.14 feet to the east line of said Lot 5; thence South 00degrees 32 minutes 40 seconds West, along said east line, 58.99 feet to the south line of said Lot 5; thence South 89degrees 54 minutes 42 seconds West, along said south line, 75.38 feet to the Northwest Corner of Lot 1 saidKENNETH N. GRANGER ADDITION; thence South 11 degrees 13 minutes 45 seconds West, along the westerly lineof said KENNETH N. GRANGER ADDITION and it's southerly extension, 244.73 feet to a point distant 52.40 feetsouthwesterly of the Southwest Corner of said Lot 2; thence South 76 degrees 42 minutes 05 seconds East, 274.47feet to the westerly line of Lot 3 said KENNETH N. GRANGER ADDITION; thence South 00 degrees 20 minutes 17seconds West, along said westerly line, 64 feet more or less to the shore line of Egg Lake; thence southwesterlyalong said shore line, 737 feet more or less to a line which bears South 78 degrees 02 minutes 24 seconds East fromthe point of beginning; thence North 78 degrees 02 minutes 24 seconds West, 110 feet more or less to the point ofbeginning.FOR THE PURPOSES OF THIS SURVEY ONLY A PORTION OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED LEGAL DESCRIPTIONIS SHOWN GRAPHICALLY. UNDERLINED PORTION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION IN NOT INCLUDED IN THISSURVEY AND IS NOT SHOWN GRAPHICALLY.EXISTING PROPERTY AREA = 185,492 SF (4.258 ACRES), AS MEASURED TO ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE.EXISTING PROPERTY - LEGAL DESCRIPTION1.EXISTING PROPERTY IS BASED ON TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY COMPLETED BY CORNERSTONE LANDSURVEYING, INC, WITH REVISED DATE OF 7-16-2021, WHICH ALSO REFERENCES CERTAIN ITEMS,LIKE EASEMENTS AND WETLAND, PROVIDED BY WSB & ASSOCIATES SURVEY OR DATA.2.BEARINGS ARE BASED ON COORDINATES SUPPLIED BY THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYORSOFFIC (NAD 83). VERTICAL DATUM BASED ON NAVD 88.3.BENCHMARKS - ELEVATIONS BASED ON INFORMATION AS SHOWN ON THE MNDOT GEDETICWEBSITE. SURVEY DISK PAUL MNDT RESET WITH AN ELEVATION OF 932.38 WAS USED TOESTABLISH VERTICAL CONTROL FOR THIS SURVEY (NAVD 88).4.EXISTING ZONING - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT5.BUILDING SETBACK LINES = VARIABLE (PUD). PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION IS ONE-STORYCOMMERCIAL RETAIL. FIRST FLOOD ELEVATIONS, SEE DEVELOPMENT GRADING PLAN.PLATTING NOTESPROPOSED PLAT NAME: DOWNTOWN HUGOPROPOSED PARCEL INFO:PROPOSED PROPERTYDOWNTOWN HUGO - PLAT SUMMARYLEGAL DESCRIPTIONAREA SFAREA ACRESNORTH LINE GOV'T LOT 4,SEC. 20, TWP. 31, RNG. 21(NE CORNER, NOT IN VIEW,SEE SURVEY)100' ROWWASHIN
G
T
O
N
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
E
G
I
O
N
A
L
RAILROA
D
A
U
T
H
O
R
I
T
Y
66' ROWU.S.HIGHWA
Y
6
1(FOREST
B
L
V
D
.
N
O
R
T
H
)ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINEAND EXISTING PROPERTY LINE612.17'PROPOSED 10' WIDEDRAINAGE AND UTILITYEASEMENT (TYP.)PROPOSED 5' WIDE DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.)PROPOSED 5' WIDE DRAINAGEAND UTILITY EASEMENT (TYP.)LOT 4BLOCK 18.00'
8.00'325.70'92.95'12.14'
144.73'252.90'299.82'126.15'ROW DEDICATIONPROPOSED 30' WIDEDRAINAGE AND UTILITYEASEMENT
GSOCGOPHER STATE ONE CALL (GSOC)STATE LAW REQUIRES CONTRACTOR TO CONTACT AND PROVIDE NOTICETO THE NOTIFICATION CENTER BEFORE BEGINNING ANY EXCAVATION.(REFER TO MINNESOTA STATE STATUTE CHAPTER 216D FOR DETAILS)E-TICKET:WWW.GSOCSUBMIT.ORGBY PHONE:EMERGENCY TICKETS:866-640-3637TWIN CITIES METRO:651-454-0002GREATER MN AREA:800-252-1166NATIONALLY:811DESCRIPTIONTITLE SHEETOVERALL - EXISTING CONDITIONS / REMOVALS PLANOVERALL - SITE PLANPHASE 1 - SITE PLANOVERALL - GRADING PLANPHASE 1 - GRADING PLANPHASE 1 - EROSION CONTROL PLANPHASE 1 - SWPPP NOTESOVERALL AND PHASE 1 - UTILITY PLANCIVIL DETAILSOVERALL - LANDSCAPE PLANPHASE 1 - LANDSCAPE PLANLANDSCAPE ENLARGEMENTLANDSCAPE DETAILSLANDSCAPE DETAILS - BOARDWALK & DECKSHEET NO.C0.0C1.0C2.0C2.1C3.0C3.1C3.2C3.3 - C3.4C4.0C5.0 - C5.7L1.0L1.1L1.2L2.0L2.1SHEET INDEXDOWNTOWN HUGOHUGO, MN100% DESIGN DEVELOPMENTPROJECT LOCATIONVICINITY MAP(NO SCALE)PROJECT LOCATIONNOTE:TITLE SHEETC0.0SHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARONCIVIL ENGINEER / LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTPAUL SCHROEDER - PROJECT MANAGERSRF CONSULTING GROUP3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARD, SUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416PH: 763-249-6796EMAIL: pschroeder@srfconsulting.comCONTACT NAME | PHONE NUMBER | EMAIL
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX1.EXISTING CONDITIONS BASED ON SURVEY (TYPE OR TITLE) BY SURVEY FIRM, DATED 00-00-0000.2.CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR VERIFYING EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION, AND NOTIFYING THE CIVIL ENGINEER AND OWNER IMMEDIATELY OFANY DISCREPANCIES. THIS INCLUDES, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, TOPOGRAPHY, ELEVATIONS, UTILITIES, VEGETATION, AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS.3.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL UTILITY LOCATES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SUBMIT A TICKET FOR PUBLIC UTILITY LOCATES 48 HOURS PRIOR TO ANY GRADING,EXCAVATION, OR UTILITY WORK THROUGH "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" (GSOC) AT WWW.GSOCSUBMIT.ORG, OR CALLING 811, ALONG WITH ANY FOLLOW-UP TO MISSING INFORMATION. THECONTRACTOR MUST HIRE A PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATING SERVICE TO LOCATE PRIVATE UTILITIES IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. THE ENGINEER SHALL BE NOTIFIEDIMMEDIATELY IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND.4.CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE ALL NECESSARY EROSION CONTROL MEASURES REQUIRED TO MAINTAIN SITE STABILITY PRIOR TO EXECUTING ANY SITE REMOVALS AND IMPROVEMENTS. SEEEROSION CONTROL PLAN AND STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) AND RELATED DOCUMENTS.5.CONTRACTOR SHALL COORDINATE LIMITS OF REMOVALS WITH PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS AND FIELD VERIFY CONDITION OF EXISTING APPURTENANCES TO REMAIN. CONTRACTOR SHALL BERESPONSIBLE FOR PROTECTING, REPAIRING, OR REPLACING MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS (SUCH AS FENCES, SIGNS, IRRIGATION HEADS, ETC.) THAT MAY BE DAMAGED BY CONSTRUCTION.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE FEATURES NOT NOTED FOR REMOVAL. PROVIDE SAWCUT AT PAVEMENT EDGE REMOVAL. PROVIDE SMOOTH TRANSITION OF ANYREMOVAL OR IMPROVEMENTS AT DISTURBANCE EDGE. HAUL AND DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVAL ITEMS OFF-SITE.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL DEMOLISH AND REMOVE ALL ITEMS ILLUSTRATED ON THE PLANS AND OTHER ITEMS, AS NECESSARY FOR THE PROJECT AND RELATED IMPROVEMENTS. THIS INCLUDESITEMS SUCH AS BUILDINGS, ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, FOUNDATIONS, PAVEMENTS, DEBRIS, VEGETATION, SUBSURFACE ITEMS (UTILITIES), UNDESIRED SOIL, AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS.VERIFY ALL SOIL CORRECTIONS WITH GEOTECH REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. HAUL AND DISPOSE OF ALL REMOVAL ITEMS OFF-SITE.7.CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE, REPAIR AND/OR RELOCATE EXISTING PRIVATE OR PUBLIC UTILITIES AS NECESSARY, WHETHER STATED ON THE PLANS OR NOT, INCLUDING ANY RELATEDPERMITS AND FEES. CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE AND RECEIVE APPROVAL FOR ACTIVITIES WITH OWNER AND UTILITY COMPANIES BEFORE STARTING WORK.8.CLEAR, GRUB, AND REMOVE ALL TREES AND VEGETATION WITHIN THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS, OR AS NOTED. STRIP TOPSOIL, STOCKPILE, AND REDISTRIBUTE PER GRADING PLAN.9.TREE PROTECTION FENCING SHALL BE INSTALLED AT THE DRIP LINE OF TREES TO REMAIN, OR AS ILLUSTRATED, WITHIN LIMITS OF DISTURBANCE PRIOR TO THE START OF CONSTRUCTION ANDMAINTAINED THROUGHOUT THE PROJECT. NO DETRIMENTAL CONDITIONS TO OCCUR AT TREE PRESERVATION AREAS, SUCH AS STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT/MATERIALS, CHEMICAL WASH, OREXCAVATION.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL STAGING AND TEMPORARY TRAFFIC CONTROL FOR THE PROJECT, AS APPROVED BY THE OWNER AND GOVERNING AGENCY. PROVIDE MINIMAL DISRUPTIONTO ADJACENT PROPERTIES AND STREETS, OR AS DIRECTED BY PROPERTY OWNER. 11.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TEMPORARY CONDITIONS, SUCH AS CONSTRUCTION TRAILER, TEMPORARY FENCING, AND OTHER SECURITY MEASURES FOR THE LENGTH OF THE ENTIREPROJECT.12.ALL CONSTRUCTION PERMITS, APPLICATIONS AND FEES ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.13.FOR ANY SALVAGE AND/OR REINSTALL ITEMS, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL WORK RELATED TO RE-LOCATION (TEMP AND PERMANENT), STORAGE, AND PROTECTION.EXISTING CONDITIONS AND SITE REMOVALS NOTESOVERALL - EXISTINGCONDITIONS /REMOVALS PLANC1.0REMOVAL LEGENDPROPERTY LINEEXISTING TOPOGRAPHY TO REMAIN(GRAY/FADED LINEWORK, TYP.)ITEMS TO BE REMOVED(BLACK LINEWORK, TYP.)REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTREMOVE BITUMINOUS TRAILMILL BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTREMOVE CONCRETE PAVEMENTREMOVE AGGREGATE SURFACEREMOVE PAVERSREMOVE LANDSCAPINGCLEAR AND GRUB (AREA)CLEAR AND GRUB (TREE)TREE PROTECTIONSAWCUT PAVEMENT (FULL-DEPTH)REMOVE CURB AND GUTTERREMOVE CHAIN-LINK FENCELIMITS OF DISTURBANCEXSHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARONNEGG LAKEUS HWY 61(FOREST BLVD N)FONDANT AVE NWASHINGTON REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY(ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD)146 THST NEDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON 12-05-19ICE ELEVATION = OHWL = 926.651FLOOD PLAIN 928.651EDGE OF DELINEATEDWETLANDREMOVE SANITARYMANHOLEREMOVE SANITARYMANHOLEREMOVE SANITARYMANHOLEREMOVE SANITARYCLEAN OUTREMOVE SANITARYMANHOLEREMOVE TELEPHONEPEDESTALREMOVE TELEPHONEPEDESTALREMOVE TELEPHONEPEDESTALREMOVE TELEPHONEPEDESTALREMOVE POSTREMOVE POWER POLE125' SHORELINESETBACK LINER.O.W. DEDICATION(8' WIDE)PHASE 1 REMOVALBOUNDARYPHASE 1 REMOVAL AREAPHASE 2 REMOVALAREASANITARY ANDCORRESPONDING REMOVALSARE PART OF PHASE 1REMOVE TREES ONLY ASNECESSARYREMOVE HYDRANTREMOVE LIGHT POLE
NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGSHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARONOVERALL - SITE PLANC2.0SITE DEVELOPMENT SUMMARYPROPERTY ADDRESS:SEE SURVEYEXISTING PROPERTY AREA:185,492 S.F. (4.258 AC)PROPOSED PROPERTY AREA:180,594 S.F. (4.146 AC), EXCLUDES ROW DEDICATION (4,898 S.F.)PROPERTY OWNER:CITY OF HUGO (DEVELOPER: DENNIS PROPERTIES)EXISTING ZONING:PUD - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENTPARCEL AREAS:SEE PRELIMINARY PLATBUILDING TOTAL (1 OR 2 - STORY):63,000 S.F.SE BUILDING (LOT 1) 6,888 S.F.SW BUILDING(LOT 2) 7,702 S.F.NW BUILDING(LOT 3) 12,588 S.F.NE BUILDING #1 (LOT 4) 2,800 S.F.NE BUILDING #2 (LOT 4) 8,290 S.F.SECOND STORY (TBD) 24,732 S.F.BUILDING USE (MIXED):63,000 S.F.OFFICE 20,000 S.F.RETAIL 25,000 S.F.RESTAURANT(540 SEATS) 18,000 S.F.FLOOR AREA RATIO (FAR):0.349 (63,000 / 180,594)BUILDING SETBACKS:VARIABLE (PUD)IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - EXISTING:81,936 S.F. (45.4%) PRE-DEMOLITION PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENTPERVIOUS SURFACE - EXISTING:98,658S.F. (54.6%)IMPERVIOUS SURFACE - PROPOSED:83,004 S.F. (46.0%)BUILDING:38,006 S.F.PAVEMENT:44,998 S.F.PERVIOUS SURFACE - PROPOSED:97,590 S.F. (54.0%)PERMEABLE PAVEMENT:68,694 S.F.LANDSCAPE AREA:28,896 S.F.PARKING SETBACKS REQUIRED:10' ROW/RESIDENTIAL ZONED, 5' OTHERPARKING SETBACKS PROVIDED:VARIABLE (PUD), SEE PLAN PARKING SPACES REQUIRED:CITY CODE = 380 SPACES1 SPACE = 250 S.F. OF RETAIL (100 SPACES)1 SPACE = 200 S.F. OF OFFICE (100 SPACES)1 SPACE = 3 SEATS CAPACITY OF RESTAURANT (180 SPACES)PARKING SPACES PROVIDED (RATIO):PER PUD = 245 SPACES (3.89 / 1,000 SF), INCLUDING 8 ACCESSIBLEPARKING SIZE REQUIRED:TWO-WAY = 9' WIDE X 18' DEPTH, WITH 24' DRIVE AISLEONE-WAY = 60 DEGREE ANGLE, 9' WIDE X 17' DEPTH, WITH 18' DRIVE AISLEPARKING SIZE PROVIDED:VARIABLE (PUD), SEE PLANBICYCLE PARKING:12 BIKES (6 LOOPS)EGG LAKESITE LEGENDPROPERTY LINEEASEMENTSETBACK LINE (PER CODE)EXISTING CONDITIONSPERMEABLE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTHEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE PAVEMENTCONCRETE WALKBRICK PAVERSTRUNCATED DOMESDECKCURB AND GUTTERCURB AND GUTTER (TIP-OUT)CURB AND GUTTER (CURB, TAPER, FLUSH)PARKING LOT POLE LIGHTMETAL TREE GRATERETAINING WALLPARKING SPACES PER ROWPOND NORMAL WATER LINE (NWL)LIMITS OF DISTURBANCECONSTRUCTION PHASE BOUNDARYNUS HWY 61(FOREST BLVD N)FONDANT AVE NWASHINGTON REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY(ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD)146 THST NR.O.W. DEDICATION(8' WIDE)EDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON12-05-19ICE ELEVATION = OHWL926.651FLOOD PLAIN 928.651EDGE OF DELINEATEDWETLAND245 STALLS W/ 8 ADA STALLS125' SHORELINESETBACK LINELOT 2BLOCK 1LOT 1BLOCK 116' x 14' TRASH ENCLOSURE(SOUTH)PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN("WELCOME TODOWNTOWN HUGO")NE BUILDING #2PRIVATE MAIN STREETNE BUILDING #1NW BUILDINGSW BUILDINGSE BUILDING16' x 14' TRASH ENCLOSURE (NORTH)FUTURE ACCESS /DRIVEWAY WITHFUTURE DEVELOPMENTDOCK (SOUTH)WALKWAY 8'X63'END 12'X14'(TOTAL LENGTH 75')DOCK (CENTRAL)WALKWAY 8'x63'END 12'X14'(TOTAL LENGTH 75')DOCK (NORTH)WALKWAY 8'X63'END 12'X14'(TOTAL LENGTH 75')BOARDWALK / DECKING(TYP.)SEASONAL OUTDOORBAR LOCATIONSEASONAL OUTDOORBAR LOCATIONB612 CONCRETE CURB &GUTTERBIKE RACKS(3 LOOPS, 6 BIKES)BIKE RACKS(3 LOOPS, 6 BIKES)18.0'24.0'18.0'9.0'25.0'18.0'9.0'60 DEGREEANGLED PARKING(TYP.)9.4'24.0'18.0'14.5'18.0'18.0'
18.
0
'
18.
0
'
18.0'18.0'9.0'9.7'5.1'12.0'9.0'9.0'
9.0'PAVER CROSSWALKWITH 1' CONCRETEBANDS (TYP.)TURN-AROUND SPACE18.0'2.5'24.0'3.4'
18.0'
24.0'
18.0'9.0'9.0'
2.0'18.0'10.2'18.0'
2.1'
9.4'9.0'
9.8'
5.7'
111.0'
17.9'
105.
7
'
1
1
.
3
'LOT 3BLOCK 1LOT 4BLOCK 118.0'24.0'18.0'9.0'2.0'12.0'12.0'14.0'24.0'18.0'6.0'18.0'24.0'18.0'5.0'5.0'7.0'MODULAR BLOCKRETAINING WALLMODULAR BLOCKRETAINING WALLMODULAR BLOCKRETAINING WALLEXPOSED BUILDINGFOUNDATION WALL AT EGGLAKE / WETLAND SIDE,BELOW BOARDWALK /DECKING (TYP.)5'X5' HEAVY DUTY CONCRETECENTERED AT STORM DRAIN INLET INPERMEABLE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT5'X5' HEAVY DUTY CONCRETECENTERED AT STORM DRAIN INLET INPERMEABLE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
NO PARKINGNO PARKINGSHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARON1.SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS AND REMOVAL PLAN, ALONG WITH ANY RELATED SURVEYS FORDETAILS ON PROPERTY BACKGROUND INFORMATION.2.REFER TO ARCHITECTURAL PLANS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON BUILDINGS, MONUMENTSIGNS, TRASH ENCLOSURES, AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS. VERIFY WITH ARCHITECTURALPLANS THE EXACT BUILDING DIMENSIONS AND LOCATIONS OF EXITS, RAMPS, TRUCKDOCKS/SERVICE, AND OTHER RELATED BUILDING ITEMS.3.SITE LIGHTING SHOWN ON PLAN IS FOR REFERENCE ONLY. REFER TO LIGHTING PLANPREPARED BY OTHERS FOR SITE LIGHTING LOCATIONS, DETAILS AND PHOTOMETRICS.4.ALL DIMENSIONS ARE TO FACE OF CURB, EDGE OF CONCRETE, OR EXTERIOR FACE OFBUILDING, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.5.ALL CURB RADII SHALL BE 5.0 FEET (TO FACE OF CURB), UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.6.ALL CURB AND GUTTER SHALL BE CONCRETE B612 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.7.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING AND MAINTAINING TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES SUCH AS BARRICADES, WARNING SIGNS, DIRECTIONAL SIGNS, FLAGGERS,AND LIGHTS TO CONTROL THE MOVEMENT OF TRAFFIC WHERE NECESSARY. PLACEMENT OFTHESE DEVICES SHALL BE APPROVED BY THE CITY PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. TRAFFIC CONTROLDEVICES IN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY SHALL CONFORM TO APPROPRIATE MNDOT STANDARDS,OR AS APPROVED.8.BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT AND CONCRETE SECTIONS TO BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THERECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER, OR AS NOTED. PAVEMENT ANDOTHER IMPROVEMENTS TO ADHERE TO ALL AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)REQUIREMENTS FOR ACCESSIBILITY, INCLUDING SLOPE. CONTACT ENGINEER IMMEDIATELYINVOLVING ANY DISCREPANCIES.9.CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN FULL ACCESS TO ADJACENT PROPERTIES DURINGCONSTRUCTION AND TAKE ALL PRECAUTIONS NECESSARY TO AVOID PROPERTY DAMAGE TOADJACENT PROPERTIES.10.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL CONSTRUCTION STAKING.11.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL SITE GOVERNMENTAL PERMITS AND FEES.SITE NOTES1.ALL TRAFFIC SIGNS, PAVEMENT MARKINGS, AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES SHALLCONFORM TO THE STANDARDS OF THE MINNESOTA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFICCONTROL DEVICES (MMUTCD), OR AS NOTED OTHERWISE.2.PARKING LOT STRIPING SHALL BE 4" WIDE COLOR WHITE, TWO COATS OF PAINT.CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT ANY/ALL DIRECTIONAL TRAFFIC ARROWS AS SHOWN IN WHITE(TWO COATS).3.ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGNS AND MARKINGS PER LATEST ADA CODE AND REQUIREMENTS.CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT THE INTERNATIONAL SYMBOL OF ACCESSIBILITY IN EACHDESIGNATED ACCESSIBLE STALL IN BLUE BACKGROUND WITH WHITE BORDER (TWO COATSOF PAINT). CONTRACTOR SHALL PAINT THE WORDS "NO PARKING" IN EACH ACCESSIBLEISLE ADJACENT TO AN ACCESSIBLE SPACE IN WHITE LETTERS MINIMUM 12" IN HEIGHT.SIGNS TO BE LOCATED AT THE HEAD OF THE PARKING SPACE. SEE ACCESSIBLE PARKINGDETAILS.4.ALL SIGNS SHALL INCLUDE MOUNTING HARDWARE, POST, CONCRETE FOOTING ANDCASING WHERE REQUIRED. CONCRETE CASING REQUIRED IN LOCATIONS WHERE POST ISNOT PROTECTED BY CURB.5.IF NOTED, ALL STOP SIGNS SHALL INCLUDE A 12" WIDE PAINTED STOP BAR IN WHITE PAINT(TWO COATS) PLACED AT THE STOP SIGN LOCATION, A MINIMUM OF 4' FROMCROSSWALK. ALL STOP BARS SHALL EXTEND FROM DIRECTIONAL TRANSITION BETWEENLANES TO THE CURB.6.ALL SIGNS SHALL BE PLACED 18" BEHIND THE BACK OF CURB, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED.SIGNAGE AND STRIPING NOTESPHASE 1 - SITE PLANC2.1EGG LAKENUS HWY 61(FOREST BLVD N)FONDANT AVE NWASHINGTON REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY(ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD)SITE LEGENDPROPERTY LINEEASEMENTSETBACK LINE (PER CODE)EXISTING CONDITIONSPERMEABLE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTHEAVY-DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENTCONCRETE PAVEMENTCONCRETE WALKBRICK PAVERSTRUNCATED DOMESDECKCURB AND GUTTERCURB AND GUTTER (TIP-OUT)CURB AND GUTTER (CURB, TAPER, FLUSH)PARKING LOT POLE LIGHTMETAL TREE GRATERETAINING WALLPARKING SPACES PER ROWPOND NORMAL WATER LINE (NWL)LIMITS OF DISTURBANCECONSTRUCTION PHASE BOUNDARYEGG LAKEUS HWY 61(FOREST BLVD N)WASHINGTON REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY(ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD)146 THST NR.O.W. DEDICATION(8' WIDE)EDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON12-05-19ICE ELEVATION = OHWL926.651FLOOD PLAIN 928.651EDGE OF DELINEATEDWETLAND118 STALLS W/ 4 ADA STALLS125' SHORELINESETBACK LINE16' x 14' TRASH ENCLOSURE(SOUTH)PROJECT MONUMENT SIGN("WELCOME TODOWNTOWN HUGO")SW BUILDINGSE BUILDINGSEASONAL OUTDOORBAR LOCATIONBIKE RACKS(3 LOOPS, 6 BIKES)60 DEGREEANGLED PARKING(TYP.)PAVER CROSSWALKWITH 1' CONCRETEBANDS (TYP.)16' WIDE TEMPORARYHEAVY DUTYBITUMINOUS DRIVEAISLE, FIELD VERIFYTEMPORARY PLAZATRANSITION, FIELDVERIFYTEMPORARY DECKTRANSITION, FIELDVERIFYA.BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT - MATCH INTO EXISTINGB.CURB AND GUTTER - MATCH INTO EXISTINGC.CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - B612D.CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER - B618 (WITHIN PUBLIC ROW)E.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP - PUBLIC (SEE MNDOT STANDARD PLANS, SHEETS C5.4 - C5.6)F.PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP - PRIVATE (SEE DETAILS, SHEET C5.6)G.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN (R7-8m) AND VAN ACCESSIBLE SIGN (R7-8b) PER MINNESOTABUILDING CODE, POST, SURFACE MOUNTH.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - STOP SIGN (R1-1, 30"), POST, GROUND OR SURFACE MOUNTI.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - BEGIN ONE-WAY (R6-6, 24"X30"), POST, SURFACE MOUNTJ.TRAFFIC SIGNAGE - ONE-WAY DO NOT ENTER (R6-2a, 18"X24"), POST, SURFACE MOUNTK.PAVEMENT MARKING - ACCESSIBILITY SYMBOL / "NO PARKING" / ACCESS AISLE CROSS HATCH, POST, SURFACEMOUNT, SEE DETAILSL.PAVEMENT MARKING - TRAFFIC ARROW SYMBOLS (WHITE PAINT)M.PAVEMENT MARKING - 4" WIDE STRIPING (WHITE PAINT)SITE KEY NOTESMODULAR BLOCKRETAINING WALLMODULAR BLOCKRETAINING WALLTEMPORARY SIGNAGEAND TRAFFIC ARROWS,FIELD VERIFYDOCK (SOUTH)WALKWAY 8'X63'END 12'X14'(TOTAL LENGTH 75')DOCK (CENTRAL)WALKWAY 8'x63'END 12'X14'(TOTAL LENGTH 75')BOARDWALK / DECKING(TYP.)EXPOSED BUILDINGFOUNDATION WALL AT EGGLAKE / WETLAND SIDE,BELOW BOARDWALK /DECKING (TYP.)LOT 2BLOCK 1LOT 1BLOCK 1PRIVATE MAIN STREETSW BUILDINGSE BUILDING18.0'24.0'18.0'9.0'25.0'18.0'9.0'
9.4'
18.0'18.0'5.1'12.0'9.0'2.1'9.0'
9.8'
5.7'
111.0'
18.0'24.0'18.0'9.0'2.0'12.0'12.0'14.0'24.0'18.0'6.0'18.0'24.0'18.0'5.0'5.0'5'X5' HEAVY DUTY CONCRETECENTERED AT STORM DRAIN INLET INPERMEABLE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT
NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKING0.5% OVERFLOW0.5% OVERFLOW0.5% OVERFLOW0.5% OVERFLOW0.5% OVERFLOW0.5% OVERFLOW0.5% OVERFLOW 0.5% OVERFLOW
0.5% OVERFLOW932.99933.23932.57932.89934.01934.77934.77934.20932.00932.01932.30932.00931.70932.00931.50931.85931.88931.74931.72933.10933.04932.50933.33932.79932.50934.88934.45934.88934.60934.88934.61934.88934.80934.63934.18933.88934.15934.37934.45933.54933.60933.50933.64932.57932.30932.09933.02934.61934.14933.32934.11934.17934.37934.67935.50935.50935.45935.43935.50935.50935.50935.40935.40934.60934.32934.50934.15934.25934.07934.75934.73934.80934.80934.80934.00934.20932.92931.68933.88933.70933.46933.30934.72934.51934.39934.23932.80932.42932.15933.60931.60931.47931.84934.39935.20934.70935.28934.60934.60931.40932.50933.95934.60933.54931.94932.27932.14934.58934.77934.53934.34931.85931.25930.85934.21933.90935.25935.35935.28934.64934.44934.77935.25934.82934.81933.93933.21933.10933.75933.25932.70932.70932.41932.00931.76932.30932.31931.79931.35931.56930.77931.69932.75934.18933.55934.27934.10933.64934.31934.81933.98933.29933.38932.85932.90934.97934.44934.60932.40930.35927.18931.20932 933 934934930932933
934934930
928 930.30929.00932.00931.92929.41931.24931.40929.67929.50932.06934.72931.58932.97934.76936.00935.79935.22935.10936.45931.14929.70934.26934.51934.46933.10931.84931.70931.85933.00933.17931.78927.97-4.9%-4.1%-2.6%-4.7%-4.4%-1.5%-4.9%-2.4%-1.7%
-2.4%
-2.
0
%-3.4%-4.1%-5.0%-4
.3%-3.6%-1.0%
-1.3%
-4.1
%
-2.8%
-4.0%-1.8%
-2.9%
-2.0
%
-2.8%
-1.7%-1.1%-3.5%-2.0%
-5.1%-5.0%-4.6%
-2.1%
-4.1
%
-2.1%
-4.2%
-2.9%
-1.6%-3.3%-1.6%
-11.4%
-0.9%
-0.7
%-19.2%-2.0%-4.5%-1.9%-0.8%-2.2%
-0.6%
-1.6
%
-1.
5
%
-0.9%
-1.4
%
-7.0%
-6.
0
%
-1.8%
-1.1%-5.9%-1.6%
-1.4%
-1.6%-2.6%-1
.3%-1.1%-1.2%-1.4%-0.6%-10.4%-3.1%-10.4%-1.6%-1.0%-2.4%
-1.7%-3.5%-1.6%-5.8%-1.4%
-4.5%
-4.5%-1.6%-1.1%-1.8%-3.3%-0.1%0.0%-0.3%-1.9%-1.9%-0.8%-1.7%-2.8%-2
.
3
%-3.3%-6
.
3
%-13.3%-1.6%934.60934.56934.12934.44929931EOF=807.20OVERALL -GRADING PLANC3.0GRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGENDPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED CONTOURS (MAJOR)PROPOSED CONTOURS (MINOR)EXISTING CONTOURS (MAJOR)EXISTING CONTOURS (MINOR)PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONTC = TOP OF CURBHP/LP = HIGH/LOW POINTD = DECK ELEVATIONEX = EXISTING GROUND ELEV.± = MATCH EXISTING, FIELD VERIFYBW/TW = FINISHED GRADE ATLOW/HIGH SIDE OF WALL (DOESNOT INCLUDE BURIED WALL OR CAP)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWPROPOSED SURFACE SLOPESILT FENCEBALE DITCH CHECKBIO ROLLINLET PROTECTIONROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCERIP-RAPSTORM SEWER (SEE UTILITY PLAN)DRAIN TILE (SEE UTILITY PLAN)RETAINING WALLTIP-OUT GUTTEROVERFLOW ROUTE (0.5% MIN. SLOPE)LIMITS OF DISTURBANCESHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARONNEGG LAKEUS HWY 61(FOREST BLVD N)FONDANT AVE NWASHINGTON REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY(ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD)146 THST NEDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON12-05-19ICE ELEVATION = OHWL926.651FLOOD PLAIN 928.651EDGE OF DELINEATEDWETLANDFFE = 935.50FFE = 935.50FFE = 935.50FFE = 935.35FFE = 935.35FFE = 935.35FFE = 934.80FFE = 934.80FFE = 934.80FFE = 933.75FFE = 932.70934.80 D934.80 D933.75 D932.70 D932.70 D932.26 D934.80 D934.80 DTWBWBWTWBWTWBWBWTWTW934.80 D934.80 D934.60 D933.75 D934.80 D933.75 DBWTWTWTWBW/TCBW/TCTWBW/TCFLOODPLAIN FILL AREA(TOTAL = 3,100 C.F.)934.80 (D)929.0 (EX)934.80 (D)928.3 (EX)934.80 (D)928.0 (EX)934.80 (D)927.3 (EX)933.75 (D)929.0 (EX)932.70 (D)929.9 (EX)SE BUILDINGSW BUILDINGNW BUILDINGNE BUILDING #1NE BUILDING #2OWHL 926.651GRADES TO MATCH EXISTING BETWEENBUILDING WALL (EXPOSED FOUNDATION)AND WETLAND LINE. MINIMIZEDISTURBANCE FOR FOUNDATION WALLCONSTRUCTION AND USE TEMPORARYMATS FOR ACCESS ROUTE, PRIMARILY INWETLAND AREAS. (TYP.)NO PERMANENT IMPACTS WITHINWETLAND AREA. MINIMIZE DISTURBANCEFOR DECK/DOCK CONSTRUCTION AND USETEMPORARY MATS FOR ACCESS ROUTE,PRIMARILY IN WETLAND AREAS. (TYP.)BUILDING ROOF STORMWATERTO SURFACE DRAIN TOPERMEABLE PAVEMENT, VIADOWNSPOUTSDECK (TYP.)DOCK934.80 DDOCK(ELEVATIONVARIABLE)DOCK(ELEVATIONVARIABLE)934.80 D929.8 (EX)REMOVE (CUT) VEGETATIONABOVE WATERLINE ALONG50'+/- WIDE CORRIDORAT EACH DOCK
NO PARKINGNO PARKING932.99933.23932.57932.89934.01934.77934.77934.20932.00932.01932.30932.00931.70932.00931.50931.85931.88931.74931.72933.10933.04932.50933.33932.79932.50934.88934.45934.88934.60934.88934.61934.88934.80934.63934.18933.88934.15934.37934.45933.54933.60933.50933.64932.57932.30932.09933.02934.61934.14933.32934.11934.17934.37934.67935.50935.50935.45935.43935.50935.50935.50935.40935.40934.60934.32934.50934.15934.25934.07934.75934.73934.80934.80934.80934.39935.20934.70935.28934.60934.60931.40932.50933.95934.60933.54931.94932.27932.14934.21933.90934.44934.60932.40931.20932 933 934934930932933930.30929.00932.00931.92929.41931.58932.97934.76936.00935.79935.22935.10936.45934.26934.51934.46933.17931.78927.97-4.9%-4.1%-2.6%-4.7%-4.4%-1.5%-4.9%-2.4%-1.7%-3.6%-1.0%
-4.0%-1.8%
-2.9%
-2.0
%
-1.7%
-5.1%-5.0%-4.6%-4.2%
-2.9%
-1.6%
-1.6%-2.0%-4.5%-1.9%-0.8%-2.2%
-0.9%-1.1%-5.9%-1.6%
-1.4%
-1.6%-2.6%-1
.3%-1.1%-1.2%-1.4%-1.7%-3.5%-1.6%-5.8%-1.4%
-4.5%
-4.5%-1.6%-1.1%-1.8%-3.3%-0.1%0.0%-0.3%-1.9%-1.9%-0.8%-1.7%-2.8%934.60934.56935.15934.80934.12935.21934.89934.89935.21934.11934.44934.80934.80928.209299311.THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TOTHE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-2, ENTITLED “STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACEUTILITY DATA.”2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TOCOMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONSFROM THE PLANS.3.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL WORK AND MATERIALS FOR GRADING, SUBSOIL CORRECTIONS (IMPORT/EXPORT), RETAINING WALLS,TOPSOIL, EROSION CONTROL AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS.4.SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.5.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET.RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.6.ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BEWATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. STRIP, STOCKPILE, AND REDISTRIBUTE EXISTING TOPSOIL,AS SUITABLE.7.FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE ATWALL GRADE TRANSITION, AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES).8.STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDSAND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED.9.DUST SHALL BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED.10.ALL SLOPES 1:3 (V:H) OR GREATER REQUIRED TO RECEIVE SURFACE EROSION CONTROL WHETHER IT IS INDICATED ON THE PLAN OR NOT:MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES.11.ALL STORM DRAINS AND INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED UNTIL ALL SOURCES OF POTENTIAL DISCHARGE ARE STABILIZED.12.TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL AND CAN NOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS OR STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SILT, CLAY, OR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AREEXEMPT EX: CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCK PILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES.13.FINAL STABILIZATION REQUIRES THAT ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND THAT DISTURBED AREAS ARESTABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH 70% OF THE EXPECTED FINAL DENSITY, AND THAT ALL PERMANENTPAVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. ALL TEMPORARY BMP'S SHALL BE REMOVED, DITCHES STABILIZED, AND SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVEDFROM PERMANENT CONVEYANCES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS IN ORDER TO RETURN THE POND/BASIN TO DESIGN CAPACITY.14.THE WATERSHED DISTRICT OR THE CITY MAY HAVE REQUIREMENTS FOR INSPECTIONS VERIFYING PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF THE BESTMANAGMENT PRACTICES (BMP) - THE MORE RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY.15.SEE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NOTES AND DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES ANDREQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL PERMITS/FEES, INSPECTORS, INSPECTIONS, ANDDOCUMENTATION. PLAN REPRESENTS MINIMAL EROSION CONTROL, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MEANS AND METHODS FORTHE PROJECT AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE.16.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL SUBGRADE SOIL CORRECTIONS, INCLUDING REMOVAL OF SUBGRADE DEBRIS, FOR PROJECT IMPROVEMENTSSUCH AS BUILDING, PAVEMENT, UTILITY, RETAINING WALLS, AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS. REFER TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ANY ADDITIONAL SITE PREPARATION INFORMATION OR REQUIREMENTS.17.IF GROUND WATER IS PRESENT IN THE EXCAVATION, OR IF THE EXPOSED SOILS ARE WET AND UNSTABLE, CONTACT THE OWNER ORENGINEER FOR A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.18.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO COMMENCING GRADING ACTIVITIES AND SHALL MAINTAIN SAIDMEASURES FOR DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE THEEROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND DISPOSE OF OFF SITE.19.CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT DIRT AND/OR DEBRIS FROM ENTERING STORM SEWER OR BEING TRANSPORTED OFF SITE IN AN UNCONTROLLEDMANOR. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AT PROJECT CLOSEOUT THAT STORM SEWER SYSTEM IS CLEAR OF SEDIMENT AND/OR DEBRIS AND ISFULLY FUNCTIONAL.20.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL MONITORING, PER REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION, TO INSPECT ANDDOCUMENT ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY (EVERY 7 DAYS) AND AFTER EVERY 0.5 INCH RAINFALL EVENT, PER REQUIREMENTS.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CORRECTIVE MEASURES IMMEDIATELY FOR ANY NON-COMPLIANCE OBSERVATIONS.21.ALL DISTURBED NON-PAVED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE TEMPORARY PROTECTION OR PERMANENT COVER WITHIN 14 DAYS OF DISTURBANCEOPERATIONS.22.WHEN TRAPPED SEDIMENT REACHES 1/3 OF THE HEIGHT OF SILT FENCE, IT SHALL BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF BY THECONTRACTOR.23.CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT FILTER SACKS SHALL BE CLEANED WHEN SEDIMENT REACHES 1/3 THE CAPACITY OF THE SACK.24.WHEN SEDIMENT IS TRACKED ON TO PAVED SURFACES, IT SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY.25.ANY SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE THAT ACCUMULATES ON OR OFF THE OWNER'S PROPERTY SHALL BE REMOVED BY THECONTRACTOR AT HIS/HER EXPENSE. ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURS FROM THE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT OR FROM THE CONTRACTOR'SREMOVAL OF THE SEDIMENT, SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS/HER EXPENSE.26.ALL EXCAVATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF OSHA 29 CFR, PART 1926, SUBPART P, “EXCAVATIONS ANDTRENCHES.” THIS DOCUMENT STATES THAT EXCAVATION SAFETY IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.27.THE CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT SPECIFIC STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN.TEMPORARY STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UNTIL THE PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS ARE ESTABLISHED.CONTRACTOR TO DESIGN AND SUBMIT ALL TEMPORARY STORMWATER ITEMS FOR ENGINEER APPROVAL.28.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL SURVEY CONSTRUCTION STAKING.GRADING, DRAINAGE, AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES PHASE 1 -GRADING PLANC3.1SHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARONNEGG LAKEUS HWY 61(FOREST BLVD N)FONDANT AVE NWASHINGTON REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY(ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD)146 THST NEDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON12-05-19ICE ELEVATION = OHWL = 926.651FLOOD PLAIN 928.651EDGE OF DELINEATEDWETLANDR.O.W. DEDICATION(8' WIDE)934.80 D934.80 DFLOODPLAIN FILL AREA(TOTAL = 3,100 C.F.)SE BUILDINGSW BUILDINGOWHL 926.651GRADES TO MATCH EXISTING BETWEENBUILDING WALL (EXPOSED FOUNDATION)AND WETLAND LINE. MINIMIZEDISTURBANCE FOR FOUNDATION WALLCONSTRUCTION AND USE TEMPORARYMATS FOR ACCESS ROUTE, PRIMARILY INWETLAND AREAS. (TYP.)NO PERMANENT IMPACTS WITHINWETLAND AREA. MINIMIZE DISTURBANCEFOR DECK/DOCK CONSTRUCTION AND USETEMPORARY MATS FOR ACCESS ROUTE,PRIMARILY IN WETLAND AREAS. (TYP.)BUILDING ROOF STORMWATERTO SURFACE DRAIN TOPERMEABLE PAVEMENT, VIADOWNSPOUTSDECK (TYP.)DOCKDOCK(ELEVATIONVARIABLE)934.80 D934.80 D934.80 D934.80 (D)929.0 (EX)934.80 D934.80 D929.8 (EX)934.80 (D)928.3 (EX)934.80 DREMOVE (CUT) VEGETATIONABOVE WATERLINE ALONG50'+/- WIDE CORRIDORAT EACH DOCKFFE = 935.50FFE = 935.50FFE = 935.50FFE = 934.80FFE = 934.80TEMPORARY GRADINGWITH TEMPORARYIMPROVEMENTS.FIELD VERIFY.GRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGENDPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED CONTOURS (MAJOR)PROPOSED CONTOURS (MINOR)EXISTING CONTOURS (MAJOR)EXISTING CONTOURS (MINOR)PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONTC = TOP OF CURBHP/LP = HIGH/LOW POINTD = DECK ELEVATIONEX = EXISTING GROUND ELEV.± = MATCH EXISTING, FIELD VERIFYBW/TW = FINISHED GRADE ATLOW/HIGH SIDE OF WALL (DOESNOT INCLUDE BURIED WALL OR CAP)EMERGENCY OVERFLOWPROPOSED SURFACE SLOPESILT FENCEBALE DITCH CHECKBIO ROLLINLET PROTECTIONROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCERIP-RAPSTORM SEWER (SEE UTILITY PLAN)DRAIN TILE (SEE UTILITY PLAN)RETAINING WALLTIP-OUT GUTTEROVERFLOW ROUTE (0.5% MIN. SLOPE)LIMITS OF DISTURBANCESOIL BORING LOCATIONTEMPORARY GRADINGWITH TEMPORARYIMPROVEMENTS.FIELD VERIFY.TWBWBWTWBWTWTWTWBW/TCBW/TCTWBW/TC
932 933 934934930932933929931
NO PARKINGNO PARKING1.THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINED ACCORDING TOTHE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-2, ENTITLED “STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACEUTILITY DATA.”2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FIELD VERIFY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES PRIOR TOCOMMENCEMENT OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONSFROM THE PLANS.3.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL WORK AND MATERIALS FOR GRADING, SUBSOIL CORRECTIONS (IMPORT/EXPORT), RETAINING WALLS,TOPSOIL, EROSION CONTROL AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS.4.SPOT ELEVATIONS REPRESENT FINISHED SURFACE GRADES, GUTTER/FLOW LINE, FACE OF BUILDING, OR EDGE OF PAVEMENT UNLESSOTHERWISE NOTED.5.CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.04 FEET. ALL CATCH BASINS IN GUTTERS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.16 FEET.RIM ELEVATIONS SHOWN ON PLANS DO NOT REFLECT SUMPED ELEVATIONS.6.ALL DISTURBED UNPAVED AREAS ARE TO RECEIVE MINIMUM OF 4 INCHES OF TOP SOIL AND SEED/MULCH OR SOD. THESE AREAS SHALL BEWATERED/MAINTAINED BY THE CONTRACTOR UNTIL VEGETATION IS ESTABLISHED. STRIP, STOCKPILE, AND REDISTRIBUTE EXISTING TOPSOIL,AS SUITABLE.7.FOR SITE RETAINING WALLS "TW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT TOP FACE OF WALL (NOT TOP OF WALL), "GW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE ATWALL GRADE TRANSITION, AND "BW" EQUALS SURFACE GRADE AT BOTTOM FACE OF WALL (NOT BOTTOM OF BURIED WALL COURSES).8.STREETS MUST BE CLEANED AND SWEPT WHENEVER TRACKING OF SEDIMENTS OCCURS AND BEFORE SITES ARE LEFT IDLE FOR WEEKENDSAND HOLIDAYS. A REGULAR SWEEPING SCHEDULE MUST BE ESTABLISHED.9.DUST SHALL BE ADEQUATELY CONTROLLED.10.ALL SLOPES 1:3 (V:H) OR GREATER REQUIRED TO RECEIVE SURFACE EROSION CONTROL WHETHER IT IS INDICATED ON THE PLAN OR NOT:MAINTAIN SHEET FLOW AND MINIMIZE RILLS AND/OR GULLIES.11.ALL STORM DRAINS AND INLETS MUST BE PROTECTED UNTIL ALL SOURCES OF POTENTIAL DISCHARGE ARE STABILIZED.12.TEMPORARY SOIL STOCKPILES MUST HAVE EFFECTIVE SEDIMENT CONTROL AND CAN NOT BE PLACED IN SURFACE WATERS OR STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS. TEMPORARY STOCKPILES WITHOUT SIGNIFICANT AMOUNT OF SILT, CLAY, OR ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AREEXEMPT EX: CLEAN AGGREGATE STOCK PILES, DEMOLITION CONCRETE STOCKPILES, SAND STOCKPILES.13.FINAL STABILIZATION REQUIRES THAT ALL SOIL DISTURBING ACTIVITIES HAVE BEEN COMPLETED AND THAT DISTURBED AREAS ARESTABILIZED BY A UNIFORM PERENNIAL VEGETATIVE COVER WITH 70% OF THE EXPECTED FINAL DENSITY, AND THAT ALL PERMANENTPAVEMENTS HAVE BEEN INSTALLED. ALL TEMPORARY BMP'S SHALL BE REMOVED, DITCHES STABILIZED, AND SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVEDFROM PERMANENT CONVEYANCES AND SEDIMENTATION BASINS IN ORDER TO RETURN THE POND/BASIN TO DESIGN CAPACITY.14.THE WATERSHED DISTRICT OR THE CITY MAY HAVE REQUIREMENTS FOR INSPECTIONS VERIFYING PROPER CONSTRUCTION OF THE BESTMANAGMENT PRACTICES (BMP) - THE MORE RESTRICTIVE REQUIREMENT SHALL APPLY.15.SEE STORMWATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NOTES AND DETAILS FOR ADDITIONAL EROSION CONTROL NOTES ANDREQUIREMENTS. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL PERMITS/FEES, INSPECTORS, INSPECTIONS, ANDDOCUMENTATION. PLAN REPRESENTS MINIMAL EROSION CONTROL, CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL MEANS AND METHODS FORTHE PROJECT AS NECESSARY TO MAINTAIN COMPLIANCE.16.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL SUBGRADE SOIL CORRECTIONS, INCLUDING REMOVAL OF SUBGRADE DEBRIS, FOR PROJECT IMPROVEMENTSSUCH AS BUILDING, PAVEMENT, UTILITY, RETAINING WALLS, AND OTHER RELATED ITEMS. REFER TO THE RECOMMENDATIONS IN THEGEOTECHNICAL REPORT FOR ANY ADDITIONAL SITE PREPARATION INFORMATION OR REQUIREMENTS.17.IF GROUND WATER IS PRESENT IN THE EXCAVATION, OR IF THE EXPOSED SOILS ARE WET AND UNSTABLE, CONTACT THE OWNER ORENGINEER FOR A RECOMMENDATION FROM THE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER.18.CONTRACTOR SHALL INSTALL ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES PRIOR TO COMMENCING GRADING ACTIVITIES AND SHALL MAINTAIN SAIDMEASURES FOR DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. UPON ESTABLISHMENT OF TURF, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL REMOVE THEEROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND DISPOSE OF OFF SITE.19.CONTRACTOR TO PREVENT DIRT AND/OR DEBRIS FROM ENTERING STORM SEWER OR BEING TRANSPORTED OFF SITE IN AN UNCONTROLLEDMANOR. CONTRACTOR TO VERIFY AT PROJECT CLOSEOUT THAT STORM SEWER SYSTEM IS CLEAR OF SEDIMENT AND/OR DEBRIS AND ISFULLY FUNCTIONAL.20.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE REQUIRED EROSION CONTROL MONITORING, PER REQUIREMENTS AND CERTIFICATION, TO INSPECT ANDDOCUMENT ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES WEEKLY (EVERY 7 DAYS) AND AFTER EVERY 0.5 INCH RAINFALL EVENT, PER REQUIREMENTS.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CORRECTIVE MEASURES IMMEDIATELY FOR ANY NON-COMPLIANCE OBSERVATIONS.21.ALL DISTURBED NON-PAVED AREAS SHALL RECEIVE TEMPORARY PROTECTION OR PERMANENT COVER WITHIN 14 DAYS OF DISTURBANCEOPERATIONS.22.WHEN TRAPPED SEDIMENT REACHES 1/3 OF THE HEIGHT OF SILT FENCE, IT SHALL BE REMOVED AND PROPERLY DISPOSED OF BY THECONTRACTOR.23.CATCH BASIN SEDIMENT FILTER SACKS SHALL BE CLEANED WHEN SEDIMENT REACHES 1/3 THE CAPACITY OF THE SACK.24.WHEN SEDIMENT IS TRACKED ON TO PAVED SURFACES, IT SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY.25.ANY SEDIMENT FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE THAT ACCUMULATES ON OR OFF THE OWNER'S PROPERTY SHALL BE REMOVED BY THECONTRACTOR AT HIS/HER EXPENSE. ANY DAMAGE THAT OCCURS FROM THE ACCUMULATED SEDIMENT OR FROM THE CONTRACTOR'SREMOVAL OF THE SEDIMENT, SHALL BE REPAIRED BY THE CONTRACTOR AT HIS/HER EXPENSE.26.ALL EXCAVATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF OSHA 29 CFR, PART 1926, SUBPART P, “EXCAVATIONS ANDTRENCHES.” THIS DOCUMENT STATES THAT EXCAVATION SAFETY IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.27.THE CONTRACTOR MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE PROJECT SPECIFIC STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN.TEMPORARY STORMWATER IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE PROVIDED UNTIL THE PERMANENT IMPROVEMENTS ARE ESTABLISHED.CONTRACTOR TO DESIGN AND SUBMIT ALL TEMPORARY STORMWATER ITEMS FOR ENGINEER APPROVAL.28.CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE ALL SURVEY CONSTRUCTION STAKING.29.STABILIZE AREA ADJACENT TO PERMEABLE PAVEMENT IMMEDIATELY TO REDUCE RISK OF CLOGGING.EROSION CONTROL NOTESPHASE 1 - EROSIONCONTROL PLANC3.2GRADING & EROSION CONTROL LEGENDSHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARONNEGG LAKEUS HWY 61(FOREST BLVD N)FONDANT AVE NWASHINGTON REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY(ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD)146 THST NEDGE OF ICE MEASURED ON12-05-19ICE ELEVATION = OHWL = 926.651FLOOD PLAIN 928.651EDGE OF DELINEATEDWETLANDPROPERTY LINEPROPOSED CONTOURS (MAJOR)PROPOSED CONTOURS (MINOR)EXISTING CONTOURS (MAJOR)EXISTING CONTOURS (MINOR)SILT FENCEBIO ROLLINLET PROTECTIONROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCEMnDOT SEED MIX 34-171 (WETLANDREHABILITATION) W/EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETSALT-TOLERANT SODMnDOT SEED MIX 25-131(COMMERCIAL TURF) W/EROSIONCONTROL BLANKETRIP-RAPSTORM SEWER (SEE UTILITY PLAN)DRAIN TILE (SEE UTILITY PLAN)RETAINING WALLR.O.W. DEDICATION(8' WIDE)FLOOD PLAIN 928.651OWHL 926.651GRADES TO MATCH EXISTING BETWEENBUILDING WALL (EXPOSED FOUNDATION)AND WETLAND LINE. MINIMIZEDISTURBANCE FOR FOUNDATION WALLCONSTRUCTION AND USE TEMPORARYMATS FOR ACCESS ROUTE, PRIMARILY INWETLAND AREAS. (TYP.)NO PERMANENT IMPACTS WITHINWETLAND AREA. MINIMIZE DISTURBANCEFOR DECK/DOCK CONSTRUCTION AND USETEMPORARY MATS FOR ACCESS ROUTE,PRIMARILY IN WETLAND AREAS. (TYP.)BUILDING ROOF STORMWATERTO SURFACE DRAIN TOPERMEABLE PAVEMENT, VIADOWNSPOUTSDECK (TYP.)DOCKDOCKSILT FENCE AT WETLANDLINE AND AS SHOWNBIO-LOGS IN WETLAND AREA ASSECONDARY PROTECTION,MINIMUM 5' CLEAR TO SILTFENCE, AND RELOCATED, ASREQUIRED, FOR DECK/DOCKCONSTRUCTIONREMOVE (CUT) VEGETATIONABOVE WATERLINE ALONG50'+/- WIDE CORRIDORAT EACH DOCKSEE LANDSCAPE PLAN FORADDITIONAL EROSIONCONTROL INFO INCLUDINGLANDSCAPE BEDS WITHSHREDDED HARDWOODMULCHROCK CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCESE BUILDINGSW BUILDINGTEMPORARY EROSIONCONTROL SUMMARYSILT FENCE: 2,360 LFBIO ROLL: 950 LFINLET PROTECTION: 6 EACHROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE: 1 EACHEROSION CONTROL BLANKET: 8,060 SY
PROJECT DESCRIPTION/LOCATION AND SCOPESEE COVER SHEET FOR LOCATION MAP AND PROJECT NUMBERS. SEE BELOW FOR OVERVIEW MAP AND CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. PERMANENT STORMWATER BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES (BMPS) UTILIZED ON THE PROJECT INCLUDEPOROUS PAVEMENT.SPECIAL AND IMPAIRED WATERSTHERE ARE NO SPECIAL/IMPAIRED WATERS LOCATED WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT LIMITS AND RECEIVE RUNOFF FROM THE PROJECT SITE.ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREASALL ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS, INCLUDING WETLANDS, ARE LABELED AS "ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS" IN THE PLANS.LONG TERM MAINTENANCE AND OPERATIONLONG TERM MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION OF BMPS WILL BE PERFORMED BY THE OWNER.SWPPP DEVELOPMENT AND MAINTENANCETHIS SWPPP WAS PREPARED BY PERSONNEL WHO ARE CERTIFIED IN THE DESIGN OF CONSTRUCTION SWPPPS. COPIES OF THE CERTIFICATIONS ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR PROVIDING A CERTIFIED EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SUPERVISOR WHO SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR FINALIZING, CERTIFYING, AND MAINTAINING THE SWPPP DOCUMENT ANDOVERSEEING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP. SEE BELOW FOR ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS. CERTIFIED SWPPP DESIGNER CONTACT: SRF - LISA BREU 763-452-4707.IN ADDITION, EACH CONTRACTOR OR SUBCONTRACTOR THAT PLACES EROSION OR SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES AS LISTED IN MNDOT SPECIFICATION 2573 SHALL PROVIDE AT LEAST ONE CERTIFIED INSTALLER AS INDICATED IN THEMNDOT SPECIFICATION.SWPPP AMENDMENTSTHE SWPPP SHALL BE AMENDED WHEN:A.THERE IS A CHANGE IN DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, WEATHER OR SEASON HAVING A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON DISCHARGE OF POLLUTANTS.B.INSPECTIONS INDICATE THE SWPPP IS NOT EFFECTIVE.C.A WATER QUALITY STANDARD CHANGES AND THE MPCA DETERMINES THE SWPPP SHALL BE AMENDED TO COMPLY.A DESCRIPTION OF ANY CHANGE TO THE SWPPP, ALONG WITH THE DATE AND NAME OF THE REVISION SHALL BE RECORDED AND INCLUDED WITH THE SWPPP AND RETAINED ON SITE. THE OWNER SHALL RETAIN ALL RECORDS AFTERCOMPLETION OF THE PROJECT.SITE PLANSTHE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE AND SUBMIT A SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR CONCRETE MANAGEMENT, CONCRETE SLURRY APPLICATION AREAS, WORK IN AND NEAR AREAS OF ENVIRONMENTAL SENSITIVITY, DEWATERINGAREAS, AREAS IDENTIFIED AS "SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN AREAS" AND AS REQUESTED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER. SUBMIT ALL SITE MANAGEMENT PLANS IN WRITING AND ALLOW A MINIMUM OF 7 DAYS FOR REVIEW BY THE PROJECTENGINEER. WORK SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TO COMMENCE IF A SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN IS REQUIRED UNTIL ACCEPTANCE HAS BEEN GRANTED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER.ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWTHE REQUIREMENTS OF RICE CREEK WATERSHED DISTRICT AND THE CITY OF HUGO ARE SATISFIED BY THE PERMANENT BMPS LISTED ABOVE AND THE TEMPORARY MEASURES INCLUDED. THERE ARE NO ADDITIONAL STORMWATERMITIGATION MEASURES REQUIRED AS A RESULT OF AN ENVIRONMENTAL, ARCHAEOLOGICAL OR AGENCY REVIEW.DRINKING WATER SOURCE MANAGEMENT AREA (DWSMA), EMERGENCY RESPONSE AREA (ERA), AND KARST REGIONSTHE PROJECT IS NOT LOCATED IN A ERA OR KARST AREA. THE PROJECT IS LOCATED IN A DWSMA WITH HIGH VULNERABILITY, THOUGH GROUNDWATER IS CONNECTED TO EGG LAKE.SOIL TYPESSOIL TYPES FOUND ON THIS PROJECT CAN BE CHARACTERIZED AS POORLY GRADED SAND, POORLY GRADED SAND WITH SILT, AND SILTY SAND.SEE SPECIAL PROVISIONS FOR ADDITIONAL WATER RELATED PERMITS SUCH AS WATERSHED DISTRICT PERMITS, WETLAND PERMITS, CITY PERMITS OR DNR PERMITS.LAND FEATURE CHANGELAND FEATURE CHANGES ARE ANTICIPATED WITH THIS PROJECT TO ACCOMMODATE THE PROPOSED BUILDINGS, ADJACENT DRIVEWAYS AND PARKING AREAS.TOTAL DISTURBED AREA = 3.88 ACEXISTING IMPERVIOUS AREA = 0.00 AC (PRE-DEMOLITION IMPERVIOUS AREA= 1.88 AC)PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 3.45 ACINCREASED IMPERVIOUS AREA = 3.45 AC (INCREASE FROM PREVIOUS DEVELOPMENT= 1.57 AC, PERMEABLE PAVEMENT=1.58 AC)PROJECT CONTACTSTHE OWNER AND CONTRACTOR ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP AND INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS BEFORE, DURINGAND AFTER CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION HAS BEEN FILED.ORGANIZATIONCONTACT NAMEPHONESRF CONSULTING GROUP (CONSULTANT)MIKE AARON763-475-0010MINNESOTA DNRPETER LEETE651-366-3634MPCA DUTY OFFICER 24 HOUR EMERGENCY NOTIFICATION:651-649-5451800-422-0798LOCATION OF SWPPP REQUIREMENTSTHE REQUIRED SWPPP ELEMENTS MAY BE LOCATED IN MANY PLACES WITHIN THE PLAN SET AS WELL AS IN THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS, CONSTRUCTION DIARIES ARE ON FILE WITH THE PROJECT OWNER. THERE MAY BE ADDITIONALREQUIRED SWPPP ELEMENTS INCLUDED ON THE PROJECT THAT ARE NOT LISTED ON THIS SHEET. IN ADDITION, THE MINNESOTA NPDES/SDS CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT SHOULD BE REVIEWED AND CONSULTED BY THEEROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL SUPERVISOR.SITE MAPS AND DESIGN CALCULATIONSIN ADDITION TO WHAT IS LOCATED WITHIN THIS PLAN, SITE MAPS AND BMP DESIGN CALCULATIONS ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST. PLEASE CONTACT THE ENGINEER OF RECORD WITH ANY QUESTIONS REGARDING THE SITE MAPSOR CALCULATIONS.GENERAL SWPPP NOTES FOR CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY1.THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE TO COMPLY WITH ALL ASPECTS OF THE NPDES CONSTRUCTION STORMWATER PERMIT AT ALL TIMES UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN FILED WITH THEMPCA (FORM IS AVAILABLE FROM MPCA WEBSITE). THE CONTRACTOR SHALL DEVELOP A CHAIN OF COMMAND WITH ALL OPERATORS ON THE SITE TO ENSURE THAT THE SWPPP SHALL BE IMPLEMENTED AND STAY IN EFFECTUNTIL THE CONSTRUCTION PROJECT IS COMPLETE, THE ENTIRE SITE HAS UNDERGONE FINAL STABILIZATION, AND THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THE MPCA.2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PREPARE A WRITTEN, NOT ORAL, WEEKLY SCHEDULE OF PROPOSED EROSION CONTROL ACTIVITIES FOR THE PROJECT ENGINEER'S APPROVAL AS PER MNDOT SPEC. 1717.2C.3.IT IS NOT ANTICIPATED THAT THE CONTRACTOR WILL BE REQUIRED TO PERFORM BURNING OF ANY MATERIAL WITHIN PROJECT BOUNDARY.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PLACE STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITS, AS NECESSARY, TO PREVENT TRACKING OF SEDIMENT ONTO PAVED SURFACES AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH PART IV.C. OF THE NPDES PERMIT. STABILIZEDCONSTRUCTION EXITS SHALL BE SUFFICIENTLY SIZED AND MAINTAINED TO PREVENT TRACK OUT. STABILIZED CONSTRUCTION EXITS SHALL BE INCIDENTAL.5.ALL TOPSOIL IN DISTURBED AREAS SHALL BE REMOVED AND STOCKPILED FOR LATER PLACEMENT. AVOID COMPACTION AS MUCH AS IS FEASIBLE IN ALL AREAS WHERE COMPACTION IS NOT REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION.COMPACTION SHALL BE AVOIDED IN ALL AREAS DESIGNATED FOR INFILTRATION.6.DO NOT DISTURB AREAS OUTSIDE OF THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS. DELINEATE AREAS NOT TO BE DISTURBED PRIOR TO STARTING GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES. IF IT BECOMES NECESSARY TO DISTURB AREAS OUTSIDE OF THECONSTRUCTION LIMITS OBTAIN WRITTEN PERMISSION PRIOR TO PROCEEDING. PRESERVE ALL BUFFERS (IF ANY) SHOWN ON THE PLANS.7.DIRECT DISCHARGES FROM BMPS TO VEGETATED AREAS AND ROUTE STORMWATER AROUND UNSTABILIZED AREAS OF THE SITE WHENEVER POSSIBLE. PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL AND VELOCITY DISSIPATION DEVICES ASNEEDED TO PREVENT EROSION AND NUISANCE CONDITIONS.8.PROVIDE STABILIZATION IN ANY TRENCHES CUT FOR DEWATERING OR SITE DRAINING PURPOSES.9.TEMPORARY DEWATERING ACTIVITIES MAY BE REQUIRED. THEREFORE, IT IS POSSIBLE THAT A PERMIT FOR THE TEMPORARY APPROPRIATION OF WATERS OF THE STATE FROM MNDNR SHALL BE REQUIRED FOR THIS PROJECT. THECONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR OBTAINING THIS PERMIT (FORMS ARE AVAILABLE FROM THE MNDNR WEBSITE). ALL TEMPORARY DEWATERING SHALL BE DISCHARGED TO AN APPROVED LOCATION FOR TREATMENTPRIOR TO DISCHARGE TO THE RECEIVING WATER. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO SUBMIT SITE MANAGEMENT PLANS TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK ACCORDING TO SPEC1717.2D. TEMPORARY DEWATERING SHALL BE INCIDENTAL.10.BASIN DRAINING ACTIVITIES OF TURBID OR SEDIMENT LADEN WATER SHALL BE DISCHARGED TO TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS WHENEVER POSSIBLE. IN THE EVENT THAT IT IS NOT POSSIBLE TO DISCHARGE THE SEDIMENT LADENWATER TO A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN THE WATER SHALL BE TREATED SO THAT IT DOES NOT CAUSE A NUISANCE CONDITION IN THE RECEIVING WATERS OR TO DOWNSTREAM LANDOWNERS.11.IT IS NOT ANTICIPATED THAT POLYMERS, FLOCCULANTS OR OTHER SEDIMENTATION TREATMENT CHEMICALS SHALL BE USED. HOWEVER, IF THE USE OF SUCH CHEMICALS BECOMES NECESSARY TO COMPLY WITH PERMITREQUIREMENTS, IT SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE NPDES PERMIT.POLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES1.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS REGARDING POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT DURING CONSTRUCTION, WHICH SHALL INCLUDE, BUT NOT BE LIMITED TO, PROVIDING THE FOLLOWING (ITEMSLISTED ARE INCIDENTAL):A.WASHOUT AREAS FOR CONCRETE, STUCCO, PAINT, FORM RELEASE OILS, CURING COMPOUNDS AND OTHER CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS FOR USE BY ALL SUBCONTRACTORS AND MATERIAL TESTING PERSONNEL. LOCATIONOF WASHOUT AREAS SHALL BE IDENTIFIED BY SIGNAGE AND SHALL BE AT LEAST 200 FT. FROM SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN REQUIREMENT AREAS (IF APPLICABLE) OR ENVIRONMENTALLY SENSITIVE AREAS, AND UTILIZE ALEAK-PROOF CONTAINMENT FACILITY OR IMPERMEABLE LINER THAT PREVENTS RUNOFF ONTO ADJACENT SOILS. AN ENGINEERED COLLECTION SYSTEM CAN ALSO BE USED IF IT IS APPROVED BY THE PROJECT ENGINEER.B.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL OBTAIN APPROVAL FROM THE PROJECT ENGINEER FOR A CHEMICAL STORAGE AREA AND SHALL DESIGNATE AN AREA FOR FUELING AND MINOR MAINTENANCE OF CONSTRUCTION VEHICLES(INCLUDING WASHING) WITH MEANS TO CAPTURE ANY FUEL SPILLS. RUNOFF SHALL BE CONTAINED IN A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN OR OTHER EFFECTIVE CONTROL AND ALL WASTE GENERATED SHALL BE PROPERLYDISPOSED OF. NO ENGINE DEGREASING IS ALLOWED ON SITE.C.SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND REMOVAL.D.SECONDARY CONTAINMENT FOR STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.E.SECURED HAZARDOUS WASTE STORAGE CONTAINERSF.CHEMICAL SPILL KITS (SHALL BE PROVIDED AT EACH LOCATION WHERE CHEMICALS ARE USED OR STORED AND ANY LOCATION WHERE VEHICLES ARE FUELED OR MAINTAINED).G.PORTABLE RESTROOM FACILITIES THAT ARE ANCHORED TO PREVENT TIPPING2.CHEMICALS SHALL BE KEPT IN A SECURE STORAGE AREA WITH RESTRICTED ACCESS IN SEALED CONTAINERS WHEN NOT IN USE. RETURN ALL CHEMICALS TO THE DESIGNATED STORAGE AREA BY THE END OF THE DAY UNLESSINFEASIBLE. CHEMICAL STORAGE CONTAINERS SHALL HAVE SECONDARY CONTAINMENT WHEN BEING USED OR STORED ON THE PROJECT SITE, AND PRODUCTS OR CHEMICALS THAT MAY LEACH POLLUTANTS SHALL BE UNDERCOVER (PLASTIC SHEETING OR TEMPORARY ROOF). CHEMICAL SPILLS OF ANY KIND (OIL, FUEL, FERTILIZER, ETC.) SHALL BE CLEANED UP AND REMOVED FROM THE SITE IMMEDIATELY. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL HAVE A SPILL KIT ONSITE AT ALL TIMES.STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVESHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARONPHASE 1 -SWPPP NOTESC3.3
STORM WATER POLLUTION PREVENTION PLAN (SWPPP) NARRATIVE, CONTINUEDPOLLUTION PREVENTION NOTES (CONT.)3.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR CREATING AND FOLLOWING A WRITTEN DISPOSAL PLAN FOR ALL HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS. THE PLAN SHALL INCLUDE HOW THE MATERIAL SHALL BE DISPOSED OF AND THELOCATION OF THE DISPOSAL SITE AND SHALL BE SUBMITTED TO THE ENGINEER PRIOR TO WORK ON SITE. LEAKS, SPILLS, OR OTHER RELEASES SHALL BE RESPONDED TO IN ACCORDANCE WITH MPCA SPILL CONTAINMENT ANDREMEDIAL ACTION PROCEDURES.4.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE METHODS AND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES THAT PREVENT DISCHARGE OR PLACEMENT OF BITUMINOUS GRINDINGS, CUTTINGS, MILLINGS, AND OTHER BITUMINOUS WASTES FROM AREAS OFEXISTING OR FUTURE VEGETATED SOILS, AND ALL WATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEMS, INCLUDING INLETS, DITCHES AND CURB FLOW LINES.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL USE METHODS AND OPERATIONAL PROCEDURES THAT PREVENT CONCRETE DUST, PARTICLES, SAW CUT SLURRY, PLANING WASTE AND OTHER CONCRETE WASTES FROM LEAVING PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY,DEPOSITING IN EXISTING OR FUTURE VEGETATED AREAS OR ENTERING STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM INCLUDING INLETS AND CURB FLOW LINES. ONSITE RELEASE OF CONCRETE SLURRY IS PERMISSIBLE IF MINNESOTAPOLLUTION CONTROL GUIDANCE FOR ROAD CONSTRUCTION CONCRETE SLURRY AND THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE SPECIAL PROVISIONS ARE FOLLOWED.EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR, INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE NOTES1.IN ACCORDANCE WITH SPEC. 2573.3 A1, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE A CERTIFIED EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR IN GOOD STANDING WHO IS KNOWLEDGEABLE AND EXPERIENCED IN THE APPLICATION OF EROSIONPREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS. PROVIDE PROOF OF CERTIFICATION (UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA - CONSTRUCTION SITE MANAGEMENT) AT THE PRECONSTRUCTION MEETING. WORK SHALL NOT BE ALLOWED TOCOMMENCE UNTIL PROOF OF CERTIFICATION HAS BEEN PROVIDED. THE EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR IS INCIDENTAL.2.THE EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR SHALL WORK WITH THE PROJECT ENGINEER TO OVERSEE THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE SWPPP AND THE INSTALLATION, INSPECTION, AND MAINTENANCE OF THE EROSION PREVENTIONAND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER CONSTRUCTION UNTIL THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION (NOT) HAS BEEN FILED WITH THE MPCA.3.THE EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR COMPLYING WITH ALL THE INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS STATED IN THE NPDES PERMIT PART IV. E. INSPECTIONS OF THE ENTIRE CONSTRUCTION SITESHALL OCCUR A MINIMUM OF ONCE EVERY SEVEN DAYS (3 DAYS FOR PROHIBITED WATERS) DURING ACTIVE CONSTRUCTION AND WITHIN 24 HOURS AFTER A RAINFALL EVENT GREATER THAN 0.5 INCHES IN 24 HOURS (IN NOCASE SHALL THE TIME BETWEEN INSPECTIONS EXCEED 7 DAYS; 3 DAYS FOR PROHIBITED WATERS). RAINFALL AMOUNTS SHALL BE OBTAINED USING A PROPERLY MAINTAINED RAIN GAUGE ONSITE OR BY A WEATHER STATIONTHAT IS WITHIN ONE MILE. THE EROSION CONTROL SUPERVISOR SHALL THOROUGHLY INSPECT ALL EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS TO ENSURE INTEGRITY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF EACH BMP.4.ALL INSPECTIONS AND MAINTENANCE CONDUCTED DURING CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RECORDED IN WRITING WITHIN 24 HOURS AND THESE RECORDS SHALL BE RETAINED WITH THE SWPPP. INSPECTION REPORTS SHALL BESUBMITTED TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER AND SWPPP DESIGNER IN A FORMAT APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. INSPECTION RECORDS SHALL INCLUDE:A.DATE AND TIME OF INSPECTIONS;B.NAME OF PERSONS CONDUCTING INSPECTIONS;C.FINDINGS OF INSPECTIONS, INCLUDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CORRECTIVE ACTIONS;D.CORRECTIVE ACTIONS TAKEN INCLUDING DATES, TIMES, AND THE PARTY COMPLETING MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES;E.DATE AND AMOUNT OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTS GREATER THAN 0.5 INCH IN 24 HOURS;F.LOCATION, DESCRIPTION AND PHOTO OF ANY DISCHARGES OFF THE PROJECT SITE.G.DOCUMENTS AND CHANGES MADE TO THE SWPPP.5.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL COMPLY WITH THE FOLLOWING INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS (INSPECTIONS MAY BE REDUCED UNDER CERTAIN CONDITIONS AS COVER IS ESTABLISHED AND CONDITIONS CHANGEAS DESCRIBED IN PART IV. E OF THE NPDES PERMIT):A.SILT FENCE SHALL BE REPAIRED, REPLACED OR SUPPLEMENTED WHEN IT BECOMES NONFUNCTIONAL OR SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 THE HEIGHT OF THE SILT FENCE. REPAIRS SHALL BE MADE WITHIN 24 HOURS OFDISCOVERY.B.INLET PROTECTION DEVICES SHOULD BE REPAIRED WHEN THEY BECOME NONFUNCTIONAL OR SEDIMENT REACHES 1/2 THE HEIGHT AND/OR DEPTH OF THE DEVICE.C.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS, IF REQUIRED, SHALL HAVE THE SEDIMENT REMOVED ONCE THE SEDIMENT HAS REACHED 1/2 THE STORAGE VOLUME WITHIN 72 HOURS OF DISCOVERY.D.REMOVE ANY SEDIMENT DEPOSITED IN SURFACE WATERS. SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED AND ANY AREA DISTURBED BY THE REMOVAL RESTABILIZED WITHIN 7 DAYS OF DISCOVERY. A SITE MANAGEMENT PLAN ISREQUIRED FOR WORK IN ANY SURFACE WATER AND APPROPRIATE AUTHORITIES SHALL BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK.E.TRACKED SEDIMENT SHALL BE REMOVED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY OF TRACKING ONTO PAVED SURFACES.F.ALL OTHER NONFUNCTIONAL BMPS SHALL BE REPAIRED, REPLACED, OR SUPPLEMENTED WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY.G.REINSTALL AS QUICKLY AS POSSIBLE ANY BMP REMOVED TO ACCOMMODATE SHORT TERM ACTIVITIES.H.CONTRACTOR SHALL BE RESPONSIBLE FOR MAINTAINING ALL BMPS UNTIL WORK HAS BEEN COMPLETED, SITE HAS GONE UNDER FINAL STABILIZATION, AND THE NOTICE OF TERMINATION HAS BEEN SUBMITTED TO THEMPCA IN ACCORDANCE WITH NPDES PERMIT OR PART II.C OF THE CONSTRUCTION GENERAL PERMIT. SEDIMENT REMOVAL AND MAINTENANCE OF BMPS IS INCIDENTAL.6.CLEAN OUT ALL PERMANENT STORMWATER BASINS REGARDLESS OF WHETHER USED AS A TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN OR SEDIMENT TRAP TO THE DESIGN CAPACITY AFTER ALL UPGRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITY ISCOMPLETED.STABILIZATION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL NOTES1.THE EROSION PREVENTION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL BMPS SHALL BE PLACED AS NECESSARY TO MINIMIZE EROSION FROM DISTURBED SURFACES AND CAPTURE SEDIMENT ONSITE. ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES SHALL BEIN PLACE PRIOR TO ANY REMOVAL WORK AND/OR GROUND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL THE POTENTIAL FOR EROSION HAS BEEN ELIMINATED. IF SEDIMENT CONTROLS ARE OVERLOADED (BASEDON FREQUENT FAILURE OR EXCESSIVE MAINTENANCE), ADDITIONAL UPGRADIENT OR REDUNDANT BMPS SHALL BE PLACED.2.SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES SHALL BE ESTABLISHED ON ALL DOWN GRADIENT PERIMETERS BEFORE ANY UP GRADIENT LAND DISTURBING ACTIVITIES BEGIN. SEDIMENT CONTROL DEVICES INCLUDE, BUT ARE NOT LIMITED TOTHE FOLLOWING:A.PERIMETER CONTROL SHALL BE LOCATED ON THE CONTOUR TO CAPTURE OVERLAND, LOW-VELOCITY SHEET FLOWS DOWN GRADIENT OF ALL EXPOSED SOILS AND PRIOR TO DISCHARGING TO SURFACE WATERS. THE BMPSHALL BE J-HOOKED AT A MAXIMUM OF 100 FOOT INTERVALS AND EACH SECTION SHALL CONTAIN NO MORE THAN 1/4 ACRE OF DRAINAGE AREA.B.SEDIMENT DAMAGE FROM STOCKPILES SHALL BE MINIMIZED BY PLACING A ROW OF SUPER DUTY SILT FENCE A MINIMUM 5 FEET FROM THE TOE. IF THERE IS NOT ADEQUATE PROJECT AREA TO PLACE THE SILT FENCEMORE THAN 5 FEET FROM THE TOE OF THE SLOPE, THE CONTRACTOR MAY SUBMIT AN ALTERNATIVE TO THE PROJECT ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL.C.DITCH CHECKS (IF REQUIRED) SHALL BE PLACED AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS DURING ALL PHASES OF CONSTRUCTION.C.A.TEMPORARY DITCH CHECKS (IF REQUIRED) SHALL CONSIST OF USING ROCK DITCH CHECKS, SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGS AND ROCK WEEPERS IN FRONT OF CULVERT INLETS. IN LIEU OF REMOVING TEMPORARY DITCHCHECKS, THE ROCK MAY BE PUSHED INTO THE GROUND.C.B.FILTER LOGS (IF REQUIRED) SHALL BE PLACED DURING PERMANENT TURF ESTABLISHMENT AT THE INTERVALS IDENTIFIED IN THE PLAN.D.FLOTATION SILT CURTAIN MAY BE USED AS PERIMETER CONTROL BUT ONLY FOR WORK ON THE SHORELINE OR BELOW THE WATERLINE. IMMEDIATELY AFTER THE CONSTRUCTION IN THE AREA IS COMPLETE, AN UPLANDBMP SHALL BE PLACED IF EXPOSED SOILS CONTINUE TO DRAIN TO THE SURFACE WATER.E.TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASINS ARE REQUIRED WHERE TEN OR MORE ACRES DRAIN TO A COMMON LOCATION (FIVE IF DRAINING TO A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER).DATE AND AMOUNT OF ALL RAINFALL EVENTSGREATER THAN 0.5 INCH IN 24 HOURS;E.A.BASIN VOLUME SHALL BE A MINIMUM OF 1,800 CUBIC FEET PER ACRE OF DRAINAGE AREA TO THE BASIN (3,600 CUBIC FEET PER ACRE IF NO CALCULATIONS ARE PERFORMED)E.B.OUTLET SHALL ALLOW COMPLETE DRAWDOWN FOR MAINTENANCE AND A STABILIZED OVERFLOW. THE OUTLET SHALL WITHDRAW WATER FROM THE SURFACE EXCEPT DURING FROZEN CONDITIONS.E.C.IF A TEMPORARY BASIN OF THE REQUIRED SIZE IS INFEASIBLE THE REASONS SHALL BE DOCUMENTED IN THE SWPPP AND ALTERNATE BMPS SHALL BE PLACED.3.PRESERVE A NATURAL BUFFER OF AT LEAST 50 FEET (100 FEET IF WITHIN 1 MILE OF AND DRAINS TO A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER) BETWEEN DISTURBED AREAS AND FLOWS TO A SURFACE WATER (NOT REQUIRED AT DITCHESOR STORMWATER CONVEYANCE CHANNELS, STORM DRAIN INLETS OR SEDIMENT BASINS). IF A BUFFER IS INFEASIBLE, PROVIDE AS LARGE A BUFFER AS POSSIBLE AND REDUNDANT SEDIMENT CONTROLS.4.STORM SEWER INLETS SHALL BE PROTECTED AT ALL TIMES WITH THE APPROPRIATE INLET PROTECTION FOR EACH SPECIFIC PHASE OF CONSTRUCTION. PROVIDE INLET PROTECTION DEVICES WITH EMERGENCY OVERFLOWCAPABILITIES. SILT FENCE PLACED IN THE INLET GRATE IS NOT AN ACCEPTABLE INLET PROTECTION BMP FOR GRADING OPERATIONS (THIS BMP SHALL BE ACCEPTED ONLY FOR SHORT INTERVALS DURING MILLING OR PAVINGOPERATIONS). INLET PROTECTION DEVICES MAY NEED TO BE PLACED MULTIPLE TIMES IN THE SAME LOCATION OVER THE LIFE OF THE CONTRACT. INLET PROTECTION DEVICES SHALL BE PAID FOR ONCE PER INLET REGARDLESS OFTHE NUMBER OF TIMES THE BMP IS PLACED. ALL STORM SEWER INLET PROTECTION DEVICES SHALL BE KEPT IN GOOD FUNCTIONAL CONDITION AT ALL TIMES. IF THE PROJECT ENGINEER DEEMS AN INLET PROTECTION DEVICE TOBE NONFUNCTIONAL, IN POOR CONDITION, INEFFECTIVE OR NOT APPROPRIATE FOR THE CURRENT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES IT SHALL BE REPLACED WITH A SUITABLE ALTERNATIVE AT NO COST TO THE OWNER.5.PAVEMENT SURFACES SHALL BE SWEPT WITHIN 24 HOURS OF DISCOVERY OF SEDIMENT OR TRACKING ONTO PAVEMENT THAT DRAINS TO CURB, INLETS, DITCHES OR PONDS. PAVEMENT SHALL BE LIGHTLY WETTED PRIOR TOSWEEPING. THIS WORK IS INCIDENTAL.6.OUTLETS INTO SURFACE WATERS SHALL BE STABILIZED WITH ENERGY DISSIPATION WITHIN 24 HOURS OF BEING CONSTRUCTED.7.DITCHES AND EXPOSED SOILS SHALL BE KEPT IN AN EVEN ROUGH GRADED CONDITION IN ORDER TO BE ABLE TO APPLY EROSION CONTROL MULCHES AND BLANKETS.8.INITIATE STABILIZATION OF ALL EXPOSED SOIL AND STOCKPILE AREAS IMMEDIATELY AFTER CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ON THAT PORTION OF THE SITE HAS TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY CEASED. TEMPORARY OR PERMANENTSTABILIZATION SHALL BE COMPLETED WITHIN NO MORE THAN 14 DAYS (7 DAYS IF IT IS WITHIN 1 MILE OF AND DRAINS TO A SPECIAL OR IMPAIRED WATER). ALL EXPOSED SOIL WITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET OF AND DRAINING TO APUBLIC WATER WITH "WORK IN WATER RESTRICTIONS" AND DURING SPECIFIED FISH SPAWNING TIME FRAMES, SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 24 HOURS. IN MANY INSTANCES, THIS SHALL REQUIRE STABILIZATION TO OCCURMORE THAN ONCE DURING ROUGH GRADING. RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 3 SHALL BE USED TO PROVIDE TEMPORARY COVER IN THESE AREAS AS APPROPRIATE. SUBSTITUTE SEED MIXTURE 21-112 OR 21-111 FOR THESPECIFIED SEED MIXTURE AS APPROPRIATE FOR THE SEASON. SEE NPDES PERMIT FOR EXCEPTIONS.9.THE NORMAL WETTED PERIMETER OF ANY TEMPORARY OR PERMANENT DRAINAGE DITCH THAT DRAINS WATER FROM THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, OR DIVERTS WATER AROUND THE CONSTRUCTION SITE, SHALL BE STABILIZEDWITHIN 200 LINEAL FEET FROM THE PROPERTY EDGE OR POINT OF DISCHARGE TO ANY SURFACE WATER. STABILIZATION SHALL OCCUR WITHIN 24 HOURS OF CONNECTION TO A SURFACE WATER, EXISTING GUTTER, STORMSEWER INLET, DRAINAGE DITCH, OR OTHER STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM ACCORDING TO SPEC 1717.2. RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 SHALL BE USED TO STABILIZE THESE AREAS (SUBSTITUTE SEED MIXTURE 21-112 OR21-111 FOR THE SPECIFIED SEED MIXTURE AS APPROPRIATE FOR THE SEASON). THE REMAINDER OF THE DITCH SHALL BE STABILIZED WITHIN 14 DAYS (7 DAYS IF IT IS WITHIN 1 MILE OF AND DRAINS TO A SPECIAL OR IMPAIREDWATER)OF CONNECTING TO THE SURFACE WATER. PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL BLANKET OR RAPID STABILIZATION METHOD 4 (SUBSTITUTE SEED MIXTURE 21-112 OR 21-111 FOR THE SPECIFIED SEED MIXTURE ASAPPROPRIATE FOR THE SEASON) SHALL BE USED TO STABILIZE THESE AREAS AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS. IN LOCATIONS WHERE THE DITCH SLOPE IS LESS THAN 2 PERCENT, DISC ANCHORED MULCH AND HYDRAULIC SOILSTABILIZERS MAY BE USED FOR DITCH BOTTOM STABILIZATION AS INDICATED IN THE PLANS OR WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER.10.ALL EXPOSED SOIL AREAS SHALL BE STABILIZED PRIOR TO THE ONSET OF WINTER. ANY WORK STILL BEING PERFORMED SHALL BE SNOW MULCHED, SEEDED, OR BLANKETED WITHIN THE TIME FRAMES LISTED IN THE NPDESPERMIT.11.ALL TOPSOIL BERMS SHALL BE STABILIZED AS FOLLOWS:A.BETWEEN APRIL 1 - AUGUST 31, SEED WITH SEED MIXTURE 21-111B.BETWEEN SEPTEMBER 1 AND MARCH 31, SEED WITH SEED MIXTURE 21-112 AND TOP WITH RAPID STABILIZATION 2.12.TILLING FOR BEDS OR TREE HOLES SHALL BE PLANTED AND MULCHED WITH WOODCHIP WITHIN 7 DAYS OR STRAW MULCHED UNTIL PLANTING OPERATIONS CAN BE COMPLETED. FILTER LOGS SHALL BE PLACED, AS NEEDED, TOTRAP SEDIMENT ON THE LOWER EDGE OF BEDS OR TREE HOLES. FILTER LOGS SHALL BE LEFT TO PHOTO DEGRADE.SHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARONC3.4PHASE 1 -SWPPP NOTES
NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGN1.THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLAN IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVEL D. THIS QUALITY LEVEL WAS DETERMINEDACCORDING TO THE GUIDELINES OF CI/ASCE 38-2, ENTITLED “STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR THE COLLECTION AND DEPICTION OFEXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA.”2.THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ALL UTILITY LOCATES. CONTACT GOPHER SATE ONE CALL PER STATESTATUTES FOR PUBLIC UTILITY LOCATES PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION. THE CONTRACTOR MUST HIRE A PRIVATE UTILITY LOCATINGSERVICE TO LOCATE PRIVATE UTILITIES IN THE CONSTRUCTION AREA PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION.3.SEE EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR SURVEY INFORMATION. THE ENGINEER CAN NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR INACCURACIESRELATED TO THE SURVEY INFORMATION.4.COMPLY WITH ALL LOCAL AND STATE REQUIREMENTS FOR UTILITY MATERIALS, INSTALLATION, AND TESTING.5.OBTAIN ALL PERMITS OR APPROVALS FROM LOCAL UTILITY OWNERS PRIOR TO BEGINNING UTILITY INSTALLATIONS. NOTIFYUTILITY OWNERS OF THE START OF CONSTRUCTION FOR THE PROJECT AND ANY SPECIFIC UTILITY WORK AT LEAST 48 HOURS INADVANCE.6.FIELD VERIFY AND COORDINATE ALL BUILDING UTILITY CONNECTIONS AND PUBLIC UTILITY SERVICE CONNECTIONS PRIOR TOCONSTRUCTION, INCLUDING LOCATION, TYPE, SIZE, AND INVERT ELEVATION. NOTIFY ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES FROM THEPLAN FOR RESOLUTION PRIOR TO BEGINNING UTILITY INSTALLATIONS.7.ADJUST, OR ARRANGE TO BE ADJUSTED BY UTILITY OWNER, ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, TO PROPOSED GRADESWHERE DISTURBED. COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET IN PAVED AREAS TOMEET OWNER'S REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING.8.SERVICE UTILITIES, SUCH AS ELECTRIC (TRANSFORMER), GAS, TELEPHONE, CABLE, FIBER OPTIC, AND OTHER RELATED SMALLUTILITIES, MAY BE SHOWN FOR GENERAL REFERENCE AND ARE DEEMED CONCEPTUAL LOCATIONS. CONTRACTOR SHALL BERESPONSIBLE FOR CONTACTING AND COORDINATING ALL LOCATIONS OF SERVICE UTILITY CONNECTIONS AND RELATED ITEMSWITH SERVICE PROVIDERS.9.WATERMAIN AND WATER SERVICE CONNECTIONS TO BE CLASS 52 DUCTILE IRON PIPE (DIP), UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.MAINTAIN 7.5' OF COVER ON ALL NEW WATERMAIN, PROVIDE WATERMAIN THRUST RESTRAINTS AT CHANGE OF DIRECTION, ANDPROVIDE 18" SEPARATION BETWEEN SEWER PIPE. ADJUST WATERMAIN VERTICALLY, AS NECESSARY, AS APPROVED BY THEENGINEER. IF INSULATION IS REQUIRED, PROVIDE DOW STYROFOAM HI BRAND 35 OR EQUIVALENT, AT 4-INCH THICKNESS.10.WATERMAIN SHALL BE INSTALLED IN CONFORMANCE WITH THE CITY ENGINEER'S ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM)STANDARDS OR THE CITY'S WATERMAIN INSTALLATION STANDARDS. WHERE CONFLICTS OCCUR, THE MORE RESTRICTIVEREQUIREMENT SHALL GOVERN.11.SANITARY SEWER PIPE OUTSIDE THE BUILDING SHALL BE POLYVINYL CHLORIDE (PVC) SCHEDULE 40, SDR35 OR 26, AS IDENTIFIEDON THE PLANS. SDR 26 REQUIRED FOR DEPTHS GREATER THAN 15 FEET.12.STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE REINFORCED CONCRETE PIPE (RCP), WITH R-4 GASKETS. RCP CLASS 5 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 18" ORSMALLER, CLASS 3 FOR PIPE DIAMETERS 21" AND LARGER UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE (PVC) TO BESCHEDULE 40. IF ALLOWED BY THE CITY, HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENE PIPE (HDPE) SHALL MEET REQUIREMENTS OF ASTM F2648.PIPE SHALL BE WATER TIGHT ACCORDING TO ASTM D3212 REQUIREMENTS. FLARED END SECTIONS SHALL BE RCP WITH TRASHGUARDS AND ROCK RIP-RAP.13.OUTSIDE OF PUBLIC RIGHT OF WAY, INLET AND OUTLET CONNECTIONS TO SEWER STRUCTURES SHALL USE APPROVED RESILIENTRUBBER JOINTS TO MAKE WATERTIGHT CONNECTIONS TO MANHOLES, CATCH BASINS, AND OTHER STRUCTURES.14.ALL MANHOLE COVERS TO BE STAMPED EITHER SANITARY OR STORM SEWER.15.PIPE LENGTHS THAT MAY BE SHOWN ARE HORIZONTALLY FROM CENTER OF STRUCTURE TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE. APRONSSHOWN ARE INCLUDED IN THE LENGTH.16.SITE UTILITY SERVICES TYPICALLY TERMINATE 5 FEET FROM BUILDING, UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.17.ALL EXCAVATIONS MUST COMPLY WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF OSHA 29 CFR, PART 1926, SUBPART P, “EXCAVATIONS ANDTRENCHES.” THIS DOCUMENT STATES THAT EXCAVATION SAFETY IS THE SOLE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE CONTRACTOR.18.DRAINTILE LOCATIONS AND QUANTITIES ARE APPROXIMATE AS ILLUSTRATED. FIELD VERIFY FINAL LOCATIONS.19.AFTER CONSTRUCTION IS COMPLETE, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE THE OWNER WITH AN AS-BUILT RECORD OF UTILITYCONSTRUCTION. THE AS-BUILT SHALL INCLUDE LOCATION AND LENGTH DEVIATIONS OR CHANGES TO THE PLAN. CONTRACTOR TOVERIFY WITH OWNER OR ENGINEER WHETHER A PLAN WITH POST-CONSTRUCTION ELEVATIONS IS REQUIRED.UTILITY NOTESOVERALL AND PHASE 1 -UTILITY PLANC4.0SHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARONUTILITY LEGENDPROPERTY LINESTORM SEWERDRAIN TILESANITARY SEWERWATER MAINELECTRIC (BURIED)ELECTRIC (OVERHEAD)TELEPHONE (BURIED)TELEPHONE (OVERHEAD)TELEVISION (BURIED)TELEVISION (OVERHEAD)FIBER OPTIC (BURIED)FIBER OPTIC (OVERHEAD)COMMUNICATION (UNDEFINED)NATURAL GAS LINELIMITS OF DISTURBANCEDRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTSSTORM MANHOLE/CATCH BASINSTORM FLARED END SECTIONCLEAN OUT (CO)SANITARY MANHOLEHYDRANTGATE VALVEEGG LAKEUS HWY 61(FOREST BLVD N)FONDANT AVE NWASHINGTON REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY(ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD)146 THST NEDGE OF ICE MEASUREDON 12-05-19ICE ELEVATION = OHWL 926.651(ALSO PROPERTY LINE)FLOOD PLAIN928.651125' SHORELINESETBACK LINE53 LF - 15" PVCSDR 35 SAN @ 0.27%111 LF - 15" PVC SDR 35 SAN @ 0.27%179 LF - 15" PVC SDR 35 SAN @ 0.27%194 LF - 15" PVC SDR 35 SAN @ 0.27%180 LF - 15" PVC SDR 35 SAN @ 0.27%80 LF - 15" PVC SDR 35 SAN @ 0.27%SAN MH 248" DIA.R-1642SOLID COVERRIM: 933.07INV. = 916.39CONNECT TOEXISTING MH 1RIM: 935.42SE INV 916.25EX. W INV 916.20SAN MH 348" DIA.NEENAH R-1642SOLID COVERRIM: 933.00W/N INV. = 916.69SE INV. = 918.50SAN MH 548" DIA.R-1642SOLID COVERRIM: 934.11INV. = 917.17SAN MH 648" DIA.R-1642SOLID COVERRIM: 934.11INV. = 917.69SAN MH 748" DIA.R-1642SOLID COVERRIM: 931.53INV. = 918.18CONNECT EXISTING15" SAN TO NEWSAN MH 8R-1642SOLID COVERRIM: 930.71SW INV. = 918.40NE INV. = 918.50±EX. 15" PVC SAN @ 0.24%45° BENDS11.25° BEND11.25° BEND45° BEND45° BEND10' (T
Y
P
.
)
20'10'
40'
15'20'10'125 LF - 8" PVC SDR 35 SAN @1.00%CONNECT EXISTING8" SAN TO NEWSAN MH 448" DIA.NEENAH R-1642SOLID COVERRIM: 931.69NW INV = 919.75EX. S INV = 919.758" DIP CL 52 WM8" DIP CL 52 WM8" DIP CL 52 WM
WITH TREESSTM FES 10212" DIA.W/ RIP RAPINV. 927.97STM SUMP CB/MH 10048" DIA.NEENAH R-1642GRATE COVER RIM 931.20INV. 928.21SUMP INV.925.21STM SUMP CB/MH 20048" DIA.NEENAH R-1642GRATE COVERRIM 930.35INV. 927.35SUMP INV. 924.35STM FES 20112" DIA.W/ RIP RAPINV. 927.1834 LF 12" RCPSTM @ 0.50%27LF 12" RCPSTM @ 0.50%20 LF 12" RCPSTM @ 0.50%STM SUMP MH 10148" DIA.NEENAH R-1642SOLID COVER RIM 931.78SW/E INV. 928.07SUMP INV. 925.078" DIP CL 52 WMNE BUILDING #2NE BUILDING #1NW BUILDINGSW BUILDINGSE BUILDINGOHWL = 926.651FFE = 934.80FFE = 934.80FFE = 933.75FFE = 932.70FFE = 935.35FFE = 935.50SAN STUB5' FROM BUILDING24 LF - 6" PVC SCH 40STUB INV. = 925.70WYE AT MAINWAT STUB5' FROM BUILDINGCOMBO WATER SERVICE34 LF - 8" DIP CL 52TEE AND VALVE AT MAIN8" DIP CL 52 WM8" DIP CL 52 WMSAN STUB5' FROM BUILDING26 LF - 6" PVC SCH 40STUB INV. = 927.80WYE AT MAINWAT STUB5' FROM BUILDINGCOMBO WATER SERVICE36 LF - 8" DIP CL 52TEE AND VALVE AT MAINSAN STUB5' FROM BUILDING28 LF - 6" PVC SCH 40STUB INV. = 927.80WYE AT MAINWAT STUB5' FROM BUILDINGCOMBO WATER SERVICE38 LF - 8" DIP CL 52TEE AND VALVE AT MAINSAN STUB5' FROM BUILDING23 LF - 6" PVC SCH 40STUB INV. = 928.50WYE AT MAINWAT STUB5' FROM BUILDINGCOMBO WATER SERVICE13 LF - 8" DIP CL 52TEE AND VALVE AT MAINSAN STUB5' FROM BUILDING25 LF - 6" PVC SCH 40STUB INV. = 928.50WYE AT MAINWAT STUB5' FROM BUILDINGCOMBO WATER SERVICE15 LF - 8" DIP CL 52TEE AND VALVE AT MAINHYDRANT12 LF - 6" DIP CL 526"X8"X8" TEE AND6" VALVE AT MAINHYDRANT10 LF - 6" DIP CL 526"X8"X8" TEE AND6" VALVE AT MAINHYDRANT9 LF - 6" DIP CL 526"X8"X8" TEE AND6" VALVE AT MAINEX. HYDRANTEX. HYDRANTHYDRANT6 LF - 6" DIP CL 52TEE AND VALVE AT MAINCONNECT TO EX.8" WATERMAIN8"X8"X6" TEE6" VALVECONNECT TO EX. 6" WATERMAIN.REMOVE HYDRANT AND VALVE,SALVAGE AND REUSE AS APPROVED BYTHE CITY.6" x 8" REDUCER AND VALVE.BUILDING ROOF STORMWATERTO SURFACE DRAIN TOPERMEABLE PAVEMENT, VIADOWNSPOUTSCAP EXISTING SANITARYLINE AT PROPERTY LINEAT THE REMOVAL OFON-SITE EXISTINGSANITARYEX. 6" WMEX. 8" SANSTM CB MH 30148" DIA.NEENAH R-3067-VRIM 933.85S INV. 929.54/ W INV. 929.44STM CB MH 30048" DIA.NEENAH R-3067-VRIM 933.65INV. 929.8460 LF 12" RCPSTM @ 0.50%27 LF 12" RCPSTM @ 0.50%CONNECT TO EX. CB MH(INV. 929.30 +/-)30'40'
””SEDIMENT CONTROL LOGSNOT TO SCALECIVIL DETAILSC5.0SHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARON
HEAVY DUTY BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONNOT TO SCALECONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTIONNOT TO SCALEPOROUS BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTIONNOT TO SCALECONCRETE WALKNOT TO SCALECONCRETE CONTROL JOINTNOT TO SCALECONCRETE EXPANSION JOINTNOT TO SCALESMALL BLOCK RETAINING WALL WITH REINFORCEMENTNOT TO SCALECIVIL DETAILSC5.1SHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARON
STANDARD FLARED END SECTION (CONCRETE APRON)NOT TO SCALEEXAMPLE DOWNSPOUT TRENCH DRAIN TO CURB PHOTONOT TO SCALECIVIL DETAILSC5.2SHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARON
TYPICAL PVC PIPE BEDDINGNOT TO SCALETYPICAL RCP PIPE BEDDINGNOT TO SCALECIVIL DETAILSC5.3SHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARON
CIVIL DETAILSC5.4SHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARON
CIVIL DETAILSC5.5SHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARON
PEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP, PARALLEL (PRIVATE)NOT TO SCALEPEDESTRIAN CURB RAMP (PRIVATE)NOT TO SCALEPARKINGACCESSAISLENOSIGN POST INSTALLATIONNOT TO SCALEACCESSIBLE SIGNAGE AND STRIPINGNOT TO SCALECIVIL DETAILSC5.6SHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARON
WATERMAIN LOWERINGNOT TO SCALECIVIL DETAILSC5.7SHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25721MICHAEL C. AARON
NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGSHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25820PAUL D. SCHROEDEROVERALL -LANDSCAPE PLANL1.0EGG LAKENUS HWY 61(FOREST BLVD N)FONDANT AVE NWASHINGTON REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY(ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD)146 THST NLANDSCAPE LEGENDPROPERTY LINEEXISTING TREE CRITICAL ROOT ZONEDECIDUOUS TREECONIFEROUS TREEORNAMENTAL TREESHRUBS/PERENNIALSMnDOT SEED MIX 34-171(WETLAND REHABILITATION)SALT-TOLERANT SODMnDOT SEED MIX 25-131(COMMERCIAL TURF)EXISTING TREE/SHRUBS TO REMAINLIMITS OF IRRIGATIONLANDSCAPE EDGERNATIVE SEED MIX TO BE AT ALLDISTURBED AREAS AS NEEDED, NOTINTENDED TO COVER ENTIRE AREAPROVIDE TEMPORARY IRRIGATIONFOR NATIVE SEED MIX DURINGESTABLISHMENT PERIODRAISED PERENNIAL BEDW/ORNAMENTAL TREE, TYP.LANDSCAPE PLANTING BEDW/BLACK VINYLCOMMERCIAL-GRADE EDGER, TYP.CANOPY TREE INCIRCULAR GRATE,TYP.SEE PEDESTRIAN PROMENADEENLARGEMENT, SHEET L1.2PRIVATE MAIN STREETLANDSCAPE SUMMARYLIMIT OF IRRIGATIONIRRIGATION PUMP ASSEMBLYLOCATION (UNDER DECK)IRRIGATION TO USE EGG LAKE FORWATER SUPPLYIRRIGATION PUMP INLET PIPELOCATION (UNDER DOCK)NE BUILDING #2NE BUILDING #1NW BUILDINGSW BUILDINGSE BUILDINGORDINARY HIGH WATERLEVEL / PROPERTY LINEEDGE OF DELINEATEDWETLANDDOCKDOCKDOCKDECKINGDECKINGALL LANDSCAPE BEDS TOHAVE SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCHFREESTANDING SIGNTRASH ENCLOSURETRASH ENCLOSUREALL LANDSCAPED ISLANDSTO HAVE SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCHOVERALL IRRIGATION LIMITS
NO PARKINGNO PARKING2ARR2UNH5IBC5CAF10SSB10SSB5SSB1QBI2UNH8CK8CK2MPR4CK3PGD6ST3CAF3CAF6ST2GD2GD14RAL6RAL8RAL10RAL2MSS1MSS1QBI5CAF10ST5SSB5SSB3HF25HH3HF220HH11HF5HF25HF11HH3HF6HF29HH4RFG21CVZ5AD17RFG6CVZ17AD2ARR5SSB2MSS1MSS3MPR15CAK3PNI1PNISHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25820PAUL D. SCHROEDERPHASE I -LANDSCAPE PLANL1.1EGG LAKENUS HWY 61(FOREST BLVD N)FONDANT AVE NWASHINGTON REGIONAL RAILROAD AUTHORITY(ABANDONED BURLINGTON NORTHERN RAILROAD)146 THST NPHASE I PLANT SCHEDULENATIVE SEED MIX TO BE AT ALLDISTURBED AREAS AS NEEDED, NOTINTENDED TO COVER ENTIRE AREAPROVIDE TEMPORARY IRRIGATIONFOR NATIVE SEED MIX DURINGESTABLISHMENT PERIODIRRIGATION PUMP ASSEMBLYLOCATION (UNDER DECK)IRRIGATION TO USE EGG LAKE FORWATER SUPPLYIRRIGATION PUMP INLET PIPELOCATION (UNDER DOCK)ORDINARY HIGH WATERLEVEL / PROPERTY LINEEDGE OF DELINEATEDWETLANDDOCKDOCKPRIVATE MAIN STREETSW BUILDINGSE BUILDINGPROVIDE TEMPORARY IRRIGATIONFOR INTERIM CONDITIONSLANDSCAPE LEGENDPROPERTY LINEEXISTING TREE CRITICAL ROOT ZONEDECIDUOUS TREECONIFEROUS TREEORNAMENTAL TREESHRUBS/PERENNIALSMnDOT SEED MIX 34-171(WETLAND REHABILITATION)SALT-TOLERANT SODMnDOT SEED MIX 25-131(COMMERCIAL TURF)EXISTING TREE/SHRUBS TO REMAINLIMITS OF IRRIGATIONLANDSCAPE EDGERALL LANDSCAPE BEDS TOHAVE SHREDDEDHARDWOOD MULCHPHASE 1 IRRIGATION LIMITS
SHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25820PAUL D. SCHROEDERLANDSCAPEENLARGEMENTL1.2NUS HWY 61(FOREST BLVD N)LANDSCAPE LEGENDPROPERTY LINEDECIDUOUS TREECONIFEROUS TREEORNAMENTAL TREESHRUBS/PERENNIALSPEDESTRIAN PROMENADE ENLARGEMENTBENCH, TYP.EXISTING R.O.W.LIGHT BOLLARD,TYP.CANOPY TREE INCIRCULAR GRATE, TYP.DECIDUOUS SHRUBHEDGE, TYP.PERENNIAL BEDW/ORNAMENTAL TREE, TYP.PEDESTRIAN CROSSING,TYP.POLE LIGHT, TYP.R.O.W. DEDICATION(8' WIDE)PERENNIAL BED W/SHADE TREEHEDGE ROW AT BACK OFPAVERSLANDSCAPE PLANTING BEDW/BLACK VINYLCOMMERCIAL-GRADE EDGER, TYP.2 X LANDSCAPE UPLIGHTW/RECEPTACLE AT TREETRUNK, , TYP.DECKEGG LAKENE BUILDING #1SEBUILDINGSW BUILDINGNWBUILDINGPRIVATE MAIN STREET
SHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25820PAUL D. SCHROEDERLANDSCAPEDETAILSL2.02X BALL DIA.2X BALL DIA.2X CONT. DIA.24"1.CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER STATE ONE CALL TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR TOINSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL2.ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SOIL CONDITIONS.3.NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA.4.COORDINATE ALL LANDSCAPE WORK WITH APPROPRIATE TEMPORARY AND PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL.5.ALL SUBSTITUTIONS MUST BE APPROVED BY THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO SUBMISSION OF ANY BID AND/OR QUOTEBY THE LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR.6.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE OFTHE LANDSCAPE ARCHlTECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING. REPLACEMENT PLANTMATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING.7.ALL PLANTS TO BE SPECIMEN GRADE, MINNESOTA-GROWN AND/OR HARDY. SPECIMEN GRADE SHALL ADHERE TO BUT IS NOTLIMITED BY, THE FOLLOWING STANDARDS:-ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM DISEASE, PESTS, WOUNDS, SCARS, ETC.-ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM NOTICEABLE GAPS, HOLES, OR DEFORMITIES.-ALL PLANTS SHALL BE FREE FROM BROKEN OR DEAD BRANCHES. ALL PLANTS SHALL HAVE HEAVY, HEALTHYBRANCHING AND LEAFlNG.-CONIFEROUS TREES SHALL HAVE AN ESTABLISHED MAIN LEADER AND A HEIGHT TO WIDTH RATIO OF NO LESS THAN5:3.8.PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED.9.PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA & ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES.10.PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; TEMPORARYONLY.11.PRIOR TO PLANTING, FIELD VERIFY THAT THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR IS LOCATED AT THE TOP OF THE BALLED & BURLAPTREE. IF THIS IS NOT THE CASE, SOIL SHALL BE REMOVED DOWN TO THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR. WHEN THE BALLED &BURLAP TREE IS PLANTED, THE ROOT COLLAR/ROOT FLAIR SHALL BE EVEN OR SLIGHTLY ABOVE FINISHED GRADE.12.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON B&B MATERIALS; REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS; SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS.13.PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY - PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING ANDPROPOSED TREES.14.WRAP ALL SMOOTH-BARKED TREES - FASTEN TOP AND BOTTOM. REMOVE BY APRIL 1ST.15.STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED; REPOSITION, PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR.16.THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING. LANDSCAPECONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS.17.TOPSOIL (AND PLANTING SOIL) TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877 (SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW), AND TOBE FREE OF ROOTS, ROCKS (LARGER THAN ONE INCH), SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS, UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE.UTILIZE EXISTING ON-SITE TOPSOIL AS APPROPRIATE. MINIMUM 4" DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12"DEPTH TOPSOIL (PLANTING SOIL) FOR TREE, SHRUBS. AND PERENNIALS.18.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE, SHRUB, PERENNIAL, LANDSCAPE BED, AND MAINTENANCE AREAS, OR AS INDICATED ON THE PLAN.SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE A MINIMUM 4-INCH DEPTH, RED COLORED (OR AS DIRECTED), AND FREE OFDELETERIOUS MATERIAL. ROCK MULCH TO BE A MINIMUM 3-INCH DEPTH, BUFF LIMESTONE (OR AS DIRECTED), AND 1.5-INCHTO 3-INCH DIAMETER. ROCK MULCH TO BE ON COMMERCIAL GRADE FILTER FABRIC, BY TYPAR, OR APPROVED EQUAL WlTHNO EXPOSURE. MULCH AND FABRIC TO BE APPROVED BY OWNER PRIOR TO INSTALLATION.19.EDGING TO BE PROVIDED BETWEEN MULCH AND LAWN TURF AREAS, OR AS INDICATED. STEEL EDGING BETWEEN LANDSCAPEBEDS AND LAWN TURF AREAS TO BE COMMERCIAL BLACK STEEL EDGING, INSTALLED PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATIONGUIDELINES. BLACK STEEL EDGING SHALL BE PLACED WITH CONNECTORS AND METAL STAKES NO GREATER THAN 4-FOOT ONCENTER AND ELEVATION BELOW LAWN MOWER CUT LINE. UTILIZE CURBS AND SIDEWALKS FOR EDGING WHERE POSSIBLE.INDIVIDUAL TREE AND SHRUB AREAS TO BE SPADED EDGE BETWEEN MULCH AND LAWN TURF GRASS AREAS WITH V-SHAPEDDEPTH AND WIDTH TO CREATE SEPARATION.20.All DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SOD TO BE STANDARD MINNESOTA GROWNAND/OR HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX, FREE OF LAWN WEEDS. SEED MIX AND APPLICATION RATE AS SPECIFIED PER MN/DOTSPECIFICATIONS, OR AS OTHERWISE NOTED. ALL TOPSOIL AREAS TO BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE POSITIVEDRAINAGE. SLOPES OF 3:1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. IF NOT INDICATED ON LANDSCAPE PLAN, SEE EROSION CONTROLPLAN. REPAIR, REPLACE, OR RESEED ANY DAMAGED OR UNESTABLISHED AREAS UNTIL PROJECT ACCEPTANCE ANDCOMPLETION OF WARRANTY.21.PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS ON SlTE, OR AS INDICATED. IRRIGATION SYSTEM TO BE DESIGN/BUILD BYLANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE IRRIGATION SYSTEM DESIGN PLANS, CALCULATIONS, ANDSHOP DRAWINGS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT APPROVAL PRIOR TO INSTALLATION. CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATIONMANUALS, AS-BUILT PLANS, AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING. SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUPDURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. COORDINATE ALLIRRIGATION PIPES, WIRING, SLEEVING, AND OTHER COMPONENTS WITH OTHER PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS.22.CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED. OWNERWILL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR.23.REPAIR ALL DAMAGE FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST TO OWNER.LANDSCAPE NOTES
15' +/-BOARDWALK / DECK AND NE BUILDING #2 FFE: 933.75WETLAND LINE ELEVATION: 928 +/- (VARIABLE)ORDINARY HIGH WATER LINE: 926.656.5' +/-NO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGNO PARKINGSHEETSHEET TITLEPROJECT INFODRAWN:DESIGNED:CHECKED:PROJECT NO:ISSUE RECORDSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:DENNIS PROPERTIES2214 FIFTH STREET, UNIT 3,WHITE BEAR LAKE, MN 55110651-247-7007Print Name:CERTIFICATIONSignature Name:Date:Lic. No.:PREPARED FORPROJECTPrint Name:I hereby certify that this plan, specification, orreport was prepared by me or under my directsupervision and that I am a duly LicensedProfessional Engineer under the laws of theState of Minnesota.3701 WAYZATA BOULEVARDSUITE 100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55416-3791PH: 763-475-0010www.srfconsulting.comNO. DATE DESCRIPTION010-22-2021CITY SUBMITTAL103-18-2022CITY RESUBMITTALDOWNTOWN HUGO
NORTHEAST CORNER OF HIGHWAY 61 / 146TH STREET N,
HUGO, MN 55038
P. SCHROEDER14356.00N. SCHAUFENBUELN. SCHAUFENBUELP. SCHROEDERXXXXX25820PAUL D. SCHROEDERLANDSCAPEDETAILS - BOARDWALKAND DECKL2.1
ELEVATION - MAIN STREET
ELEVATION - LAKE SIDE
ELEVATION - MAIN STREET
ELEVATION - LAKE SIDE
2022 Banner Designs to Consider
Agenda Item 5
2016 Banner DesignsAgenda Item 5