HomeMy WebLinkAboutEDA PACKET 11.21.23If you need accommodations for the EDA meeting please contact
Rachel Juba at (651) 762-6304 or rjuba@ci.hugo.mn.us, thank you.
Agenda
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (EDA)
Tuesday, November 21, 2023
Hugo City Hall
5:30 PM
5:30 pm 1. Call to Order
5:31 pm 2. Roll Call
(Arcand, Chrun, Denaway, Klein, Puleo, Weidt)
5:32 pm 3. Approval of Minutes
EDA Meeting of September 19, 2023
5:35 pm 4. Update on Highway 61 Visioning Study
5:50 pm 5. Update on Downtown Redevelopment
6:05 pm 6. Review of 2023 Goals
6:15 pm 7. Adjournment
If you need accommodations for the EDA meeting please contact
Rachel Juba at (651) 762-6304 or rjuba@ci.hugo.mn.us, thank you.
Background memo for the EDA Meeting of Tuesday, November 21, 2023
3. Approval of Minutes
Staff recommends approval of the minutes from the September 19, 2023 meeting as presented.
4. Update on Highway 61 Visioning Study
Staff will provide an update on the Highway 61 Visioning Study. The Project Management Team
held a workshop with the Washington County Board on October 24, 2023 to discuss the future
of the separately managed MnDOT Highway and Washington County Regional Rail Authority
corridors. Included in the packet is the presentation that County Staff gave to the County Board.
5. Update on Downtown Redevelopment
Staff will provide an update on the Downtown Hugo project.
6. Review of 2023 Goals
Staff will provide a review of the 2023 EDA Goals.
MINUTES FOR THE EDA MEETING OF SEPTEMBER 19, 2023
President Weidt called the meeting to order at 5:29pm.
PRESENT: Arcand, Denaway, Klein, Weidt
ABSENT: Chrun, Puleo
STAFF: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director
Max Gort, Associate Planner
Bryan Bear, City Administrator
APPROVAL OF MINUTES FOR THE EDA MEETING OF AUGUST 15, 2023
Commissioner Klein made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Denaway, to approve the August 15,
2023 EDA meeting minutes.
Ayes: All.
Nay: None.
Motion carried.
SPONSORSHIP REQUEST FROM THE HUGO AREA BUSINESS ASSOCIATION FOR KIDZ N BIZ FEST
Juba introduced Celeste Knipping, Vice President of the Hugo Area Business Association (HBA) and
owner of the Argyle Moose gift shop in the Victor Marketplace shopping center . Knipping presented
the HBA request for a $1,000 sponsorship from the EDA for the HBA’s annual Kidz N Biz event .
Knipping said that Kidz N Biz is the HBA’s primary public-facing event held each year, where kids and
families can interact with local businesses in a carnival-style environment. The sponsorship tiers had
been reduced from four tiers to three. In previous years, the EDA had given a $750 sponsorship to the
HBA for Kidz N Biz, but with the reduction in sponsorship tiers, Knipping stated the HBA is now
requesting $1,000 stage-level sponsorship. Juba stated that the last time the EDA increased the Kidz N
Biz sponsorship amount was 2016.
Commissioner Klein made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Arcand, to award the sponsorship of
$1,000 to the HBA for Kidz N Biz.
All ayes.
Motion Carried.
UPDATE ON HIGHWAY 61 VISIONING STUDY WORKSHOP
Juba gave background on the progress of the Highway 61 Visioning Study since the last EDA meeting
on August 15th, 2023. The Project Management Team (PMT) had a few more stakeholder meetings,
one with the Metropolitan Council and with Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) railroad company.
These two meetings both had heavy focus on the future of the right-of-way owned by the
Washington County Regional Rail Authority, which has historically been set aside for the development
of a transit corridor.
ADJOURNMENT
Commissioner Klein made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Denaway, to adjourn the meeting at
6:15 PM.
Ayes: All
Nay: None
Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted.
Max Gort, Associate Planner
Highway 61 Visioning Study and
Relationship to Regional Rail Property
County Board Work Session
October 24, 2023
2
Work Session Discussion Approach
•Introduction
•Highway 61 Visioning Study Overview
•Regional Rail Property Background and
Considerations
•Desired Direction
3
Highway 61 Visioning and Jurisdictional Turnback Study
•Visioning Study in Hugo
•Turnback Study in Hugo and Forest Lake
•1994 Memorandum of Understanding with Minnesota
Department of Transportation (MnDOT)
•2014 MN Jurisdictional Realignment Project
•2040 Comprehensive Plan
4
Highway 61 Visioning and Jurisdictional Turnback Study
•Highway Corridor
•~65-to 110-foot Right-of-Way
•Work with Hugo to identify future vision of corridor to
support City and County Priorities
•Engage with Forest Lake on recent city-led planning
for corridor
•Regional Rail Authority (RRA) Property ( )
•75-to 100-feet along west side of Hwy 61, north of
CSAH 8/140th St. in Hugo (10 miles)
•Hardwood Creek Regional Trail
5
Highway 61 Visioning Study Overview
Study Goals
Determine right-of-way needs for the corridor based on the needs of
each travel mode (e.g., cars, trucks, transit, pedestrians, bicyclists)
Determine a financial plan and timeline for the Highway 61
jurisdictional transfer through Hugo and Forest Lake
Evaluate access and intersection locations onto Highway 61 and
recommend future improvements at key locations
Define a corridor vision that supports economic growth, community
investment, and long-term transportation goals while increasing
safety for all users
Identify pedestrian and bicycle safety and connectivity improvements
throughout the corridor
7
Study Process & Schedule
Define a preferred corridor vision;
Compile study report summarizing
process and outcomes;
Outline jurisdictional transfer plan
including implementation,
financial, and timeline
considerations
Explore
Spring/Summer
2023
Evaluate
Summer/Fall 2023
Define
Winter 2023/2024
Develop and evaluate corridor
improvement alternatives with
consideration to community priorities
and traffic engineering solutions
Collect data and assess
existing/forecasted conditions;
Consider future developments in
Hugo and Forest Lake;
Explore corridor issues and
opportunities
We are here!
8
Stakeholder Engagement
•City Council and City Staff
•Open House –In Person and Online
•Good Neighbor Days Pop-Up Event
•Stakeholder Meetings
•Hugo Area Business Association
•BNSF RR and Minnesota Commercial Railways
•Watershed District
•Metropolitan Council
•Business/Property Owner Meetings
•Planning Commission/Economic Development
Authority Work Session
9
Key Takeaways & Vision Attributes
Support for management
as unified transportation
corridor (trail, transit,
highway)
Interest in creating
“tighter” corridor to
support economic
development
•Value “small town feel”
•Recognize community growth
•Not a pass through, but destination
•Traffic concerns (safety, mobility, speed)
•Support multiple modes of transportation
•Value natural resources
•Walkability and pedestrian crossings –connection to trail
•“High intensity recreation corridor”
•Improved aesthetics (CSAH 8/Frenchman Rd)
10
Regional Rail Property Background and
Considerations
11
Rush Line Transit Corridor
•Original vision for transit from Hinkley to Union Depot in St. Paul
•Rush Line Task Force
•“…consists of city, county and township-elected officials planning
transit improvements to enhance mobility, promote economic
development and preserve community and environmental assets
within the Rush Line Corridor”
•21 communities (Joint Powers Agreement)
•Quarterly meetings
•Washington County Regional Railroad Authority purchased freight
rail corridor and opened Forest Lake Transit Center to support
future transit in the Corridor.
12
Recent Transit Planning and Decisions
•2017 Rush Line Corridor Locally Preferred Alternative Report
•Eliminated dedicated bus or rail north of White Bear Lake due to high
cost and low ridership
•Connecting bus route identified as transit option between Forest
Lake and White Bear Lake which best met project goals
•METRO Purple Line BRT
•White Bear Lake Council
2022 Resolution
•Terminus Alternatives
•Route Modification Study
13
Other Planning Considerations
•2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP) - Rush
Line Transit Corridor (Purple Line) ending at
White Bear Lake
•Demand for dedicated bus and rail in
Hugo/Forest Lake beyond planning
projections (beyond 2050)
•Potential opportunity to “reimagine” Rush
Line separate from Purple Line –emphasize
trail/bike corridor with transit taking a
different form than a “line on a map” (ex:
microtransit or on-demand transit)
Rush Line does not
extend north of
White Bear Lake
14
Washington County Regional Rail Authority Property
•Regional Rail Authority (RRA) Property in Question
•75-to 100-feet along west side of Hwy 61
•1994 –9.5 miles from Forest Lake to 145th St in Hugo
•2014 –1/2 mile from 145th St to 140th St/CSAH 8
•Active Rail corridor south of CSAH 8/140th Ave N in Hugo
•Property Management Plan (PMP), 2002
•Highway 61 as only linear corridor identified in plan
•Permitted Use (Hardwood Creek Regional Trail, recent
roundabout at 159th)
•All permits are temporary…and may be discontinued at
such a time that the property is needed for the
implementation of transit or rail transportation
CSAH 8/140th St
145th St
Hardwood Creek
Trail Extension
Active Rail Line
2014 Property
Purchase
1994 Property Purchase –
extends north to County line
15
Input on Use of Regional Rail Property
Preserve future
rail/dedicated
BRT transit
Preclude future
rail/dedicated
BRT transit
16
Desired Direction
How to proceed in planning for transportation,
including transit, along Highway 61?
Maintain separate,
parallel transit and
highway corridors
Approach as unified transportation
corridor
2 3
1
17
Desired Direction
Considerations Maintain Separate, Parallel
Transit and Highway Corridors
Unified Transportation
Corridor which Preserves
Future Rail/Dedicated BRT
Unified Transportation
Corridor which Precludes
Future Rail/Dedicated BRT
Transit Options All modes –transit on west side All modes -flexibility in location In-traffic or shoulder running
transit modes
Additional
Right-of-Way
Needs
55-60’additional ROW on east
side of Hwy 61
35-60’ additional ROW 0-15’ additional ROW
Other Recreation trail corridor, including paved trail and horse/snowmobile trail, to be accommodated in all
options
1 2 3
3
18
Maintain Separate, Parallel
Transit and Highway Corridors
Unified Transportation
Corridor which Preserves
Future Rail/Dedicated BRT
Unified Transportation
Corridor which Precludes
Future Rail/Dedicated BRT
Requires additional
55-60’ ROW
Requires additional
35-60’ ROW
RRA Property
Line
RRA Property
Line
RRA Property
Line
Existing Hwy
ROW Line
Existing Hwy
ROW Line
Existing Hwy
ROW Line
Requires additional
0-15’ ROW
21
Preserve future
rail/dedicated
BRT transit
Preclude future
rail/dedicated
BRT transit
19
Desired Direction
How to proceed in planning for transportation,
including transit, along Highway 61?
Maintain separate,
parallel transit and
highway corridors
Approach as unified transportation
corridor
2 3
1
20
•Engage with Rush Line Task Force & Elected
Officials
•Develop corridor alternatives based on data
collection, visioning input, and direction from
Board
•Present alternatives at public Open House
(fall/winter 2023)
•Evaluate alternatives and feedback to identify
recommendations
•Outline Jurisdictional Transfer Plan
•Update Property Management Plan
Maddie Dahlheimer, Senior Planner
madeline.dahlheimer@co.washington.mn.us
651-430-4338
Next Steps
2023 Goals
Economic Development Authority (EDA)
•Stay informed of the Highway 61 Visioning Study with Washington
County
•Discuss and encourage small area planning in the area of 165th Street
and Highway 61
•Evaluate commericaly zoned property in regards to uses, including
residential.
•Assist and encourage redevelopment and beautification of properties in
downtown
Development and Downtown Redevelopment
•Continue low development costs
•Continue business visits and the BR&E Program
•Provide resource lists for business
•Promote Washington County CDA grant and Open to Business Program
Maintain a Business Friendly Environment
•Continue memberships of economic development associations
•Encourage businesses to identify themselves as being located in Hugo
•Attend Technology Corridor (I35E) meetings
•Continue to encourage and monitor infrastructure improvements to
promote economic development
Marketing / Promotion of the City
•Continue partnering with local businesses and the HBA
•Continue to partner with Washington County on its Economic
Development Strategic Plan
•Meet with property owners with property for sale to see if there is any way
the City can help
Partnerships