My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
BZ Minutes 10.12.23
Hugo
>
Community Development
>
Board of Zoning
>
BOZA Minutes
>
2023 BOZA Minutes
>
BZ Minutes 10.12.23
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/2/2025 4:27:26 PM
Creation date
5/2/2025 4:27:00 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Minutes for the Board of Zoning Meeting of Thursday, May 23, 2024 <br />Chair Weidt called the meeting to order at 6:32 pm. <br />PRESENT: Arcand, Petty, Weidt. <br />ABSENT: None. <br />STAFF: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director <br /> Max Gort, Associate Planner <br /> <br />Approval of Minutes for the BOZA Meeting of October 12, 2023 <br /> <br />Board Member Arcand made a motion, seconded by Chair Weidt to approve minutes for the meeting <br />of October 12, 2023. <br /> <br />All ayes. <br />Motion carried. <br /> <br /> <br />Public Hearing: Michael and Lindsay Osterman, 12494 Goodview Avenue North – Variance request <br />for an accessory building to be placed in front of the house. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Gort provided a background on the request submitted by Hunter and Brayanna <br />Smith for their property located at 12033 Everton Avenue North . The request was to allow for a 1,200 <br />square foot accessory building to have setback of 10 feet from the rear property line, where 30 feet is <br />required by ordinance. The property is bordered to the east by a 60-foot wide city-owned right of way. <br />The applicant has a portion of fence and a concrete slab that are located within the right of way , and <br />the eventual removal of this fence and slab are a condition of approval for the v ariance. The request <br />has practical difficulties in meeting the ordinance standards. The request is a reasonable use because <br />accessory buildings up to 1,500 square feet are allowed in the R-1 zoning district, the proposal meets <br />all other ordinance requirements, and existing trees provide adequate screening from the view of the <br />road. The property is unique due to the right of way bordering the east and west, the location of the <br />house towards the rear of the property, and the steep sloping terrain preventing placemen t elsewhere. <br />The variance will not alter the character of the area since accessory buildings are common in the R -1 <br />zoning district, and the City-owned property immediately adjacent is vacant. The spirit and intent of a <br />required minimum rear yard setback is to allow space between buildings and property lines, and staff <br />is of the opinion that the proposal will allow for an adequate amount of space. Staff found that the <br />request met the necessary requirements to approve a variance, and recommended approval of t he <br />variance request to the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Board Member Arcand asked about the history of the City right of way to the east of the property. <br />Community Development Director Juba stated that the right of way behind the house was part of an <br />1886 plat that crated small cabin-style lots in the area, but were never developed. Juba said that there <br />is a need for the City to keep the right of way, but that the need is not immediate.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.