Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1972.09.29 PC Minutes I CI) DESIGN PLANNING ASSOCIATES, INC. 4826 Chicago Avenue So. Minneapolis, Minnesota 55417 Phone: (612) 822.2106 September 29 , 1972 MEMORANDUM To : Hugo Village Council From: Design Planning Associates , Inc . Subject : Progress Report on Hugo Comprehensive Planning Program Activities of the planning consultant for the month of September centered primarily in the survey and analysis phase of the program. Research was performed in the area's of population , housing and economics for subsequent presentation of same to the Planning Commission at their study meeting of September 13th . The survey of existingland use was undertaken and initial map p data discussed with the Planning Commission for corrective purposes . The remainder of the village land use will be discussed in October . A list of suggested community development goals for Hugo was pre- pared and presented to the Planning Commission for their reviewal prior to the October study meeting . These goals will be expanded upon during October and discussed with the Hugo residents at a public informational meeting at the Hugo Elementary School on November 8th . Consultant planners , Carl R. Dale and Bob Eidem , participated in the village bus tour on Saturday , September 16th . This proved to be a valuable tour for all who attended because many facts of the village were made known which possibly would have otherwise gone unnoticed. Activities of the consultant in October will involve research and presentation of data in the areas of existing utilities , community facilities , transportation , land use and history. Results of the reconnaissance survey will be discussed with the Planning Commission as an initial step into further discussion of goals and policies . Existing land use map data will be discussed with the Commission for accuracy. Hugo Village Council i would suggest that Ed Kuntz be replaced on the Village Planning Commission, Ed has missed five of our meetings. we are going thru a very critical time and it would behoove the council to get as much input as possible for both the zoning ordinance and the comprehensive plan, i would also suggest that you reconsider the formation ordinance #101 and amend sect, 2 subd. A to provide, for appointment of one planning commissionmember be each of the council members„ The chairman to be appointed by the council and three additional "at large" members by the council. 1 amendment to ae ction 8 , This gives the planning commission member the ability to relate to one person on the council and the council members then has a direct line to the planning __" commission. The planning commission member term would run concurrent with his or her council representative, twhich requires amendment of Section 3. Graham Anderson Chairman of Planning Commission V