HomeMy WebLinkAbout2026.03.16 CC Packet
A. CALL TO ORDER
B. ROLL CALL
C. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
D. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1. March 2, 2026, City Council Meeting
E. APPROVAL OF AGENDA
F. APPOINTMENTS/PRESENTATIONS
1. Lakes Center for Youth & Families Annual Report – Executive Director Tim Cryer
2. Washington County Assessors Update - Appraiser Tyson Terry
G. CONSENT AGENDA
All matters listed under the Consent Agenda are considered to be routine by the City Council
and will be enacted by one motion and a roll call vote. If a member of the City Council or
the public wishes to discuss an item, that item will be removed from the Consent Agenda and
will be considered separately.
1. Approve Claims Roster
2. Approve Lakes Center for Youth & Families Professional Services Agreement
3. Approve Reciprocal Emergency Services Agreement with SBM
4. Approve Lawful Gambling Permit to Conduct Excluded Bingo for Chain of Lakes
Rotary Event on April 18, 2026
5. Approve Temporary Liquor License for Chain of Lakes Rotary Event on April 18, 2026
Mayor:
Tom Weidt
Councilmembers:
Becky Petryk, Ward 1
Ben Krull, Ward 2
Dave Strub, Ward 3
Mike Miron, At Large
City Council Agenda
Monday, March 16, 2026
Address:
14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N.
Hugo, MN 55038
Phone:
651-762-6300
Website:
www.ci.hugo.mn.us
H. PUBLIC HEARING
1. Nothing Scheduled
I. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
1. Update and Approval of Resolution Supporting the Glacial Hills Regional Trail
2. Update on Hardwood Creek Regional Trail
J. NEW BUSINESS
1. Nothing Scheduled
K. VISITOR PRESENTATIONS
1. Nothing Scheduled
L. COUNCIL PRESENTATIONS
1. Nothing Scheduled
M. ADMINISTRATIVE PRESENTATIONS
1. Reminder – Open House for 165th Street AUAR on March 24, 2026
2. Reminder – Local Board of Appeals and Equalization on Thursday, April 2, 2026
3. Schedule Hardwood Creek Regional Trail Open House on Wednesday, April 8, 2026
4. Schedule Annual Kidz ‘n Biz on Saturday, April 18, 2026
5. Schedule Joint Workshop with the Planning Commission for Zoning Code Review on
Thursday, April 23, 2026
6. Summer Concerts in Lions Volunteer Park
N. ADJOURNMENT
BACKGROUND MEMO FOR THE CITY COUNCIL MEETING ON MARCH 16, 2025
D.1 Minutes from the March 2, 2026, City Council Meeting
Staff recommends Council approve the above minutes as presented.
F.1 Lakes Center for Youth & Families Annual Report – Executive Director Tim Cryer
Lakes Center for Youth & Family (LC4YF) is one of two organizations that provide mental
health services to Hugo residents, and Council allocates funding in the budget to support these
programs. Executive Director Tim Cryer will present to Council the LC4YF 2025 Annual
Report.
F.2 Washington County Assessors Update - Appraisers Dan Squyres and Tyson Terry
Washington County Residential Property Appraiser Tyson Terry will provide Council an update
on the County and Hugo property assessments in preparation for the Local Board of Appeals and
Adjustments meeting on April 2, 2026.
G. 1 Approve Claims Roster
Staff recommends Council approve the Claims Roster as presented.
G.2 Approve Lakes Center for Youth & Families Professional Services Agreement
Over the past several years, the City has entered into an agreement with the Lakes Center for
Youth & Families to support programs for Hugo families relating to counseling, intervention,
and enrichment. Through this agreement, the City sponsors LCYF by providing financial
support. In the 2026 budget, Council approved $17,670 in funding for their services. Staff
recommends Council approve the Professional Services Agreement with Lakes Center for Youth
& Families.
G.3 Approve Reciprocal Emergency Services Agreement with SBM
On January 1, 2026, the City of Centerville contracted fire service coverage with the Spring Lake
Park-Blaine-Mounds View (SBM) Fire Department. SBM has asked the City of Hugo Fire
Department to continue our auto aid response to Centerville like we agreed with the Centennial
Fire District in past years. Hugo Fire Chief Jim Compton, Jr. has provided a Reciprocal
Emergency Services Agreement for Council review. This agreement is reciprocal as they will
also be providing resources for structure fires in the City of Hugo and will ensure proper
equipment and staffing is available on all structure fires in the service area. Staff recommends
Council approve the Reciprocal Emergency Services Agreement with SBM.
G.4 Approve Lawful Gambling Permit to Conduct Excluded Bingo for Chain of Lakes
Rotary Event on April 18, 2026
The Chain of Lakes Rotary has applied for a Lawful Gambling Permit to hold Bingo at their
event on April 18 at the Peder Pederson Pavilion. Gambling permits are issued by the State after
being approved by the City Council. Staff recommends Council approve the Lawful Gambling
application for the Chain of Lakes Rotary to conduct excluded bingo on April 18, 2026.
G.5 Approve Temporary Liquor License for Chain of Lakes Rotary Event on April 18,
2026
The Chain of Lakes Rotary has applied for a Temporary Liquor License to serve alcohol at their
event on April 18 at the Peder Pederson Pavilion. Temporary licenses are issued by the State
after being approved by the City Council. Staff recommends Council approve the Temporary
Liquor License for the Chain of Lakes Rotary to serve alcohol at their event on April 18, 2026.
I.1 Update and Approval of Resolution Supporting the Glacial Hills Regional Trail
At the meeting of February 18, 2026, the Parks Commission recommended support of the Glacial
Hills Regional Trail Long Range Plan. Connor Schaefer, Washington County Senior Planner,
will present the final plan and review the planning process which has included extensive public
engagement including two open houses in Hugo (November 16, 2023 and July 29, 2024). City
staff participated in the technical advisory committee and the GHRT plan aligns with City of
Hugo plans. The Parks Commission recommends approval of a resolution and letter of support
for the Glacial Hills Regional Trail Long Range Plan.
I.2 Update on Hardwood Creek Regional Trail
At the meeting of March 21, 2022, the City Council approved a letter of support for construction
of the final extension of the Hardwood Creek Regional Trail and subsequent applications for
grant funding. Washington County was notified in summer 2025 that they were awarded
funding through the Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund. The proposed extension
includes utilizing city trails and sidewalks on 140th Street and Fenway Boulevard and partnership
in their reconstruction with the city’s 2026 street improvement project. New trail would be
constructed from 130th Street to Hugo’s southern border on 120th Street adjacent to Falcon
Avenue. Erin Blaylock, Washington County Engineer, will provide an update on the Hardwood
Creek Regional Trial Extension.
M.1 Reminder – Open House for 165th Street AUAR on March 24, 2026
Council has scheduled a meeting to attend the 165th Street AUAR Open House on Monday,
March 24, 2026, from 5:30 – 7:30 p.m.
M.2 Reminder – Local Board of Appeals and Equalization on Thursday, April 2, 2026
Council has scheduled the Local Board of Appeals and Equalization meeting for Thursday, April 2,
2026, at 5:30 p.m. in the Oneka Room.
M.3 Schedule Hardwood Creek Regional Trail Open House on Wednesday, April 8, 2026
Washington County will hold an open house on the Hardwood Creek Regional Trail on April 8,
2026, from 4-6 p.m. in the Oneka Room. Staff recommends Council schedule a meeting if they
wish to attend.
M.4 Schedule Annual Kidz ‘n Biz on Saturday, April 18, 2026
The City will hold the Annual Kidz ‘n Biz on Saturday, April 18, 2026, from 9 a.m. – noon.
Staff recommends Council schedule a meeting if they wish to attend.
M.5 Schedule Joint Workshop with the Planning Commission for Zoning Code Review on
Thursday, April 23, 2026
In 2024, the City Council directed staff to begin a review of the zoning code as it relates to all
zoning districts and performance standards, in order to bring the code into compliance with the
2040 Comprehensive Plan and modern-day development practices. The City Council attended a
joint workshop with the Planning Commission on September 19, 2024. Staff is requesting to hold
a second joint workshop on Thursday, April 23, 2026, at 5:30 p.m. in the Oneka Room at City
Hall.
M.6 Summer Concerts in Lions Volunteer Park
Staff has scheduled four concerts in Lions Volunteer Park for Summer 2026. Concerts are
scheduled for evenings in May, July, August, and September.
N. Adjournment
MINUTES
City Council Meeting
City Hall Council Chambers
Monday, February 3, 2026
7:00 p.m.
Call to Order
Mayor Weidt called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m.
Roll Call and Pledge of Allegiance
COUNCIL PRESENT: Krull, Miron, Petryk, Strub (ZOOM), Weidt
COUNCIL ABSENT: None
OTHERS PRESENT: City Administrator Bryan Bear, City Engineer Mark Erichson, City
Attorney Dave Snyder, Community Development Director Rachel Juba, City Clerk Michele
Lindau
Approve Minutes for the February 2, 2026, City Council Meeting
Petryk made motion, Krull seconded, to approve the minutes for the City Council meeting held
on February 2, 2026, as presented.
All Ayes. Motion carried.
Approve Minutes for the February 17, 2026 HBA Breakfast
Miron made, Petryk seconded, to approve the minutes for the Hugo Area Business Association
Breakfast held on February 17, 2026, as presented.
All Ayes. Motion carried.
Approval of Agenda
Weidt made motion, Miron seconded, to approve the agenda as presented.
All Ayes. Motion carried.
Recognition of Parks Commissioner Ranell Tennyson
At its July 14, 2014, meeting, Council approved the appointment of Ranell Tennyson to the
Parks Commission. Council approved her resignation on December 15, 2025, when Ranell
declined reappointment to the Commission after serving for over 11 years.
Ranell was in attendance with her family. Mayor Weidt presented her with a certificate of
appreciation for her volunteerism on the Parks Commission. Council members expressed their
pleasure in having her on the Commission and indicated they would welcome her back anytime.
Council Meeting Minutes for March 2, 2026
Page 2 of 7
Parks Commission Annual Report – Parks Planner Shayla Denaway
Parks Planner Shayla Denaway provided to Council the Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Commission Annual Report.
Shayla began with information on the success of the City’s facility rentals and the software that
allowed 55% of the rentals to be completed online. There was a total of 882 reservations;
however total revenue was down $1,300 last year, likely due to the increase in use by nonprofits.
Eight percent of the reservations were made by non-residents, 29% by residents, and 63% by
nonprofits, who use the Rice Lake Center at no cost or the Oneka Room at a discounted rate of
$20. There were 56 rentals that had alcohol at their events, which require a paid deposit and
certificate of insurance and are not allowed by nonprofits. Rentals at the Peder Pedersen
Pavilion are primarily on the weekends, and reservations fill up quickly.
Other actions in 2025 included the painting and wallpapering of the Peder Pedersen Pavilion and
the naming of Prairie Park, which the City has taken over maintenance of. Oneka Lake Park was
a big project last year. Flagstaff Recreation provided concepts, and a pour-in-place surfacing
was added. Yet to be done this spring are the painting of the shelter and some concrete work.
Public Works tried something new in 2025 to combat the damage done to trails from the roots of
willow trees growing near stormwater ponds or wetlands. A contractor provided an herbicide
that browned the willows, followed by the Public Works Department mowing them. It is hoped
this will create more longevity and safety on the trails.
Other activities in 2025 include the bands MT Pockets and Loose Change, who performed at
Lions Volunteer Park in the summer; Washington County Story Times; and the Santa Party and
Tree Lighting. The missing connection on the Hardwood Creek Trail is progressing with
funding received through Washington County. The Parks Commission had met at Clearwater
Creek Preserve and was pleased with the woodchip base Public Works had put on the trail. As
part of the Beaver Ponds Neighborhood Street project in 2025, trails were resurfaced and
pedestrian ramps installed. Replacement of park signs began in 2025 and will continue this year.
Also this year, a committee will continue work on the design guidelines for the Veterans
Memorial for Lions Volunteer Park, which will be presented to Council in the near future.
Approval of Consent Agenda
Petryk made motion, Miron seconded, to approve the following Consent Agenda:
1. Approve Claims Roster
2. Approve Annual Performance Review for Senior Engineering Technician Liz Finnegan
3. Approve Annual Performance Review for Building Department Secretary Debi Close
4. Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Madison Siebenaler
5. Approve Donation to the Hugo Fire Department from the Hugo American Legion
6. Approve Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit for Ducks Unlimited at the Hugo American
Legion on April 17, 2026
7. Approve Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit for Ducks Unlimited at Sal’s Angus Grill on
April 19, 2026
8. Approve Water Surface Use Permit for Bald Eagle Water Club
Council Meeting Minutes for March 2, 2026
Page 3 of 7
9. Approve Ordinances Amending the Right of Way Ordinance and Related Fees
10. Approve Request for Proposals for Frog Hollow Playground Replacement
11. Approve Replacement of Water Truck Tank
12. Approval of Sale of Surplus Public Works and Fire Department Equipment
All Ayes. Motion carried.
Approve Claims Roster
Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Claims Roster as presented.
Approve Annual Performance Review for Senior Engineering Technician Liz Finnegan
Liz Finnegan was hired on March 11, 2019, as the City’s Senior Engineering Technician.
Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the annual performance review for Senior
Engineering Technician Liz Finnegan.
Approve Annual Performance Review for Building Department Secretary Debi Close
Debi Close was hired as the City’s Building Department Receptionist on March 20, 2006.
Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the annual performance review for Building
Department Secretary Debi Close.
Approve Annual Performance Review for Public Works Worker Madison Siebenaler
Madison Siebenaler was hired starting February 18, 2025. Adoption of the Consent Agenda
approved the annual performance review for Public Works Worker Madison Siebenaler.
Approve Donation to the Hugo Fire Department from the Hugo American Legion
The Hugo American Legion has requested to donate $1,000 to the Hugo Fire Department from
pull tab proceeds for equipment and training. All donations to the Fire Department must be
approved by the Council. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the donation of $1,000 to
the Hugo Fire Department.
Approve Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit for Ducks Unlimited at the Hugo American
Legion on April 17, 2026
Ducks Unlimited Coon Rapids Chapter had applied for a Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit to
hold bingo at its event on April 17, 2026, at the Hugo American Legion. The permit is issued by
the Gambling Control Board after it is approved by the City. Adoption of the Consent Agenda
approved the Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit for Ducks Unlimited American Legion Chapter.
Approve Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit for Ducks Unlimited at Sal’s Angus Grill on
April 19, 2026
Ducks Unlimited White Bear Lake Chapter had applied for a Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit
to hold bingo at its event on April 19, 2026, at Sal’s Angus Grill. The permit is issued by the
Council Meeting Minutes for March 2, 2026
Page 4 of 7
Gambling Control Board after it is approved by the City. Adoption of the Consent Agenda
approved the Lawful Gambling Exempt Permit for Ducks Unlimited White Bear Lake Chapter.
Approve Water Surface Use Permit for Bald Eagle Water Club
Paul Chapin, President of the Bald Eagle Water Club, had applied for a Water Surface Use
Permit on behalf of the club. The permit would allow for a slalom course to be installed at the
north end of Bald Eagle Lake. They also have a course at the southwest end of the lake and
would like to have one on the north end for times when winds prohibit the use of that course.
The Washington County Sheriff’s Office issues the permit after it is approved by the City.
Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the Water Surface Use Permit for the Bald Eagle
Water Club
Approve Ordinances Amending the Right of Way Ordinance and Related Fees
With the ongoing expansion of fiber optics within the City of Hugo and the amount of staff time
required to manage the expansion projects, staff recommended approval of an amendment to the
Right of Way Ordinance and the establishment of related fees. Amendments to the Right of Way
Ordinance will provide more clarity and requirements to permittees to help facilitate successful
projects that will benefit both residents and staff. Revenue generated from fees will cover staff
time spent managing ROW permits and fiber optic project installations. Adoption of the Consent
Agenda approved ORDINANCE 2026-547 AMENDING CHAPTER 82 – UTILITIES,
ARTICLE IV RIGHT-OF-WAY and ORDINANCE 2026-548 AMENDING SECTION 30-2,
FEE SCHEDULE TO INCLUDE FEES FOR RIGHT OF WAY (ROW) RELATED and the
summary ordinances for publication.
Approve Request for Proposals for Frog Hollow Playground Replacement
At the meeting of February 18, 2026, the Parks Commission recommended replacement of the
playground at Frog Hollow Park. Funding of $300,000 was included for the project in the Parks
Capital Improvement Plan. The current playground was installed in 2005 and has significant
surface wear and color fading. The existing playground curb and other park amenities are in
good shape and are not planned to be replaced. Minor landscaping improvements are anticipated
following the installation of new playground equipment. The Parks Commission intends to
request proposals from multiple playground designers and hold a neighborhood meeting to select
the preferred playground. Adoption of the Consent Agenda approved the replacement of the
playground at Frog Hollow Park and the request for proposals.
Approve Replacement of Water Truck Tank
In 2015, the City purchased a used water truck from Mountain Hi Truck in Walla Walla
Washington for gravel road maintenance. This winter staff discovered leaks in the water tank
from corrosion. Staff researched repairing the existing tank and found the cost to be prohibitive
compared to the longevity of an old tank. Quotes were received to budget for a new water truck
(chassis and tank), both steel and stainless steel. Pricing came in at $350,000.00 to $375,000.00
and would require renting water trucks for the interim. A third option would be ordering a new
exact replacement tank from the original manufacturer for the existing chassis. New tanks are
now sandblasted and epoxied on the interior for longevity. Since the City’s Peterbilt chassis
Council Meeting Minutes for March 2, 2026
Page 5 of 7
alone has little resale value but is still in good condition, staff believes this is the best option for
cost and longevity for the City of Hugo. After discussion with the Finance Director, and given
the substantial cost of the replacement, staff recommended funding the purchase through the
Equipment CIP Fund to prevent depleting the Street Department General Fund budget. Adoption
of the Consent Agenda approved the ordering and purchase of a new water tank from Mountain
High Truck & Equipment LLC for $28,000.00 with an additional cost of $15,000.00 for
shipping, sandblasting, painting the exterior, and installing new fenders for the chassis.
Approval of Sale of Surplus Public Works and Fire Department Equipment
Public Works and Fire Department staff requested the City Council approve the sale of several
pieces of City equipment that are no longer of service to the departments. Some of this
equipment had been replaced and new equipment was already in service, and other pieces no
longer in use had been stored at Public Works and the Fire Hall. Public Works staff would like to
utilize an online auction service to facilitate the sale of this equipment. Adoption of the Consent
Agenda approved the sale of surplus equipment using an online auction format.
Approve Resolution Adopting Water and Sanitary Sewer Pro Forma Financial Guide for
2026 and Establishing Service Rates
Josh Wicklander, 14230 Geneva Way North, requested this item be removed from the Consent
Agenda. Mayor Weidt granted the request.
City Administrator Bryan Bear gave a brief update on this item. The Finance Department had
completed its analysis of water and sewer billing data and prepared a pro forma financial guide
and corresponding service rates for the 2026 fiscal year. Water and sewer rates were last
adjusted in 2025. At that time, adjustments were made to both base rates and usage rates. The
overall goal is to provide adequate revenue to cover water and sewer operations as contained in
the pro forma financial guide. Bear explained it is an enterprise fund and expenses and revenues
need to balance.
Mr. Wicklander questioned if the rate increase was due to the White Bear Lake lawsuit. He
wanted more information on what was driving the cost factor and what could be done to get
other agencies to stop increasing costs.
Bear replied that, so far, the White Bear Lake issues have not affected the water rate; it is
impactful, but the City has been aggressive in addressing it. There are legal fees, but they do not
apply to water rates. One outcome from the lawsuit could be a total watering ban. The City
derives income from people using water, and irrigators do pay a substantial amount. Overall, the
water and sewer total bill will result in about a 5% increase, which is directly related to operating
the water utility and the Metropolitan Council’s increase in fees for treatment costs.
Mr. Wicklander thanked the Council.
Weidt added that the City has been a good steward by working on water reuse projects that saved
the City nearly 100 million gallons of water last year.
Council Meeting Minutes for March 2, 2026
Page 6 of 7
Miron made motion, Petryk seconded, to approve RESOLUTION 2026 – 2 ADOPTING A
PRO FORMA FINANCIAL GUIDE FOR WATER AND SANITARY SEWER OPERATIONS
FOR THE 2026 FISCAL YEAR AND ESTABLISHING SERVICE RATES
All Ayes. Motion carried.
Approve Plans and Specs and Authorize Bids for 2026 Bald Eagle Industrial Park Area
Street Improvement
City Council had previously authorized staff to prepare plans and specifications for the 2026
Bald Eagle Industrial Park Area Street Improvement Project. City Engineer Mark Erichson
explained the project consists of full-depth pavement removal, paving, mill and overlay
improvements, spot curb and gutter replacement, trail improvements, street lighting
improvements, and minor utility improvements. Plans and Specifications have been prepared and
are ready for advertising for bidding. He recommended Council approve the resolution
approving plans and specifications and authorizing advertisement for bids for the 2026 Bald
Eagle Industrial Park Area Street Improvement Project.
Petryk made motion, Krull seconded, to approve RESOLUTION 2026-3 APPROVING PLANS
AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE
2026 BALD EAGLE INDUSTRIAL PARK AREA STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.
All Ayes. Motion carried.
Declare Cost to be Assessed and Set Public Hearing for 2026 Bald Eagle Industrial Park
Area Street Improvement
On December 15, 2025, the City of Hugo authorized the preparation of plans and specifications
and held a public hearing ordering the improvements for the 2026 Bald Eagle Industrial Park Area
Street Improvement Project. As part of the public improvement process, in accordance with the
requirements of State Statute Chapter 429 for assessments to benefiting properties, the Council
needs to declare the costs to be assessed and conduct the assessment hearing. A resolution
declaring the costs to be assessed and ordering the preparation of the proposed assessment roll was
prepared for Council consideration. Staff recommends Council approve the resolution declaring
costs to be assessed and the resolution setting the assessment hearing for the 2026 Bald Eagle
Industrial Park Area Street Improvement Project for April 6, 2026.
City Engineer Mark Erichson presented a map showing the project location that included 130th
Street North, 140th Street North, Fenway Boulevard North, Fenway Boulevard Court North, and
Farnham Avenue North. He explained the improvements will include street reconstruction, trail
improvements, widening 130th Street North four feet to the north, mill and overlay improvements,
and demolition of the building at Watertower Park.
The total estimated project cost is $4,690,400. In accordance with the last Assessment Policy
updated in 2013, residential lots will be assessed $4,100 per unit for partial reconstruction and
$2,100 per unit for the urban roadway overlay. Commercial properties will be assessed $76.87 per
foot for partial reconstruction and $39.87 per foot for urban roadway overlay. The total amount to
assessed is $1,033,33. The City will pay $3,192,720, and the County will pay $464,350.
Council Meeting Minutes for March 2, 2026
Page 7 of 7
Erichson presented a map showing the area to be assessed adding that assessment hearings are
usually held later in the project schedule, but since the amounts are quite substantial, he wanted
to hold the hearing in April. Assessments could still be paid in November.
Krull made motion, Petryk seconded, to approve RESOLUTION 2026-4 DECLARING THE
COST TO BE ASSESSED AND ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED
ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE 2026 BALD EAGLE INDUSTRIAL PARK AREA STREET
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT.
All Ayes. Motion carried.
Petryk made motion, Miron seconded, to approve RESOLUTION 2026-5 FOR HEARING ON
PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2026 BALD EAGLE INDUSTRIAL PARK AREA
STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECT
All Ayes. Motion carried.
Schedule Open House for 165th Street AUAR on Tuesday, March 24, 2026
City Administrator Bryan Bear informed council that an open house will be held on Tuesday,
March 24, 2026, from 5:30-7:30 p.m. in the Oneka Room to gather input on the 165th Street
AUAR.
Weidt made motion, Petryk seconded, to schedule a meeting to attend the open house on March
24, 2026.
All Ayes. Motion carried.
Adjournment
Miron made motion, Krull seconded, to adjourn at 7:44 p.m.
Motion carried.
Respectfully submitted,
Michele Lindau
City Clerk
Assessment
Report
- 2026 -
This report includes specific information regarding the 2026 assessment, as well as
general information about both the appeals and assessment processes.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................... 3
Sales Analysis Section ............................................................................................................................................... 4
Sales Analysis......................................................................................................................................................... 4
Sales Statistics Defined ........................................................................................................................................ 4
Arm’s-Length Transactions ................................................................................................................................. 6
Residential Lender-Mediated Sales ................................................................................................................... 8
County Sales Statistics by Classification ........................................................................................................ 10
Historic Average Sale Prices: Single Family & Townhome/Condo............................................................ 12
Past & Current Year Adjustments/Parcel Count Section ................................................................................ 13
Agricultural Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments ............................................................................ 13
Agricultural Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments ............................................................................. 14
Agricultural Class: Parcel Counts ................................................................................................................ 15
Apartment Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments ............................................................................. 16
Apartment Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments .............................................................................. 17
Apartment Class: Parcel Counts.................................................................................................................. 18
Commercial/Industrial Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments ........................................................ 19
Commercial/Industrial Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments ......................................................... 20
Commercial/Industrial Class: Parcel Counts............................................................................................. 21
Residential/SRR Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments .................................................................... 22
Residential/SRR Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments ..................................................................... 23
Residential/SRR Class: Parcel Counts ........................................................................................................ 24
Total Taxable Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments ......................................................................... 25
Total Taxable Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments .......................................................................... 26
Total Taxable Class: Parcel Counts ............................................................................................................. 27
Residential/SRR Class: Current Year Value Changes ................................................................................... 28
Market Value Section ............................................................................................................................................ 29
Distribution of Market Value by Classification ............................................................................................ 29
Historical Median Residential Improved Value: Residential/SRR ........................................................ 30
Historical Median Residential Improved Value: Townhomes/Condos ............................................... 31
Historical Median Residential Improved Value: Single Family ............................................................. 32
Single Family and Townhome/Condo breakdown .................................................................................. 33
Historical County Median Residential Improved Value (Data from page 30) .................................... 33
Other Assessment Related Information ............................................................................................................ 34
New Construction .............................................................................................................................................. 34
Current New Construction Starts: All Classifications .............................................................................. 34
Past & Current New Construction Starts: Single Family and Townhome/Condo .............................. 35
Historical New Construction Summary: All Classifications .................................................................... 36
Appraiser Activity: Permit & Quintile Review Counts ................................................................................ 37
Appraiser Activity: Tax Petition Related ....................................................................................................... 38
Tax Petitions for Payable Years 2021-2025 .............................................................................................. 39
Assessment Process: Statutory Requirements ............................................................................................. 40
Appeals Process ................................................................................................................................................. 42
Property Tax Calendar ...................................................................................................................................... 44
2026 Local Board & Open Book Meeting Schedule ..................................................................................... 46
3 | Page
INTRODUCTION
The Washington County Assessor Division has prepared this 2026 Assessment Report for use by
the County Board, City Councils, Town Boards, residents, and staff. This report includes specific
information regarding the 2026 assessment, as well as general information about both the
appeals and assessment processes.
Minnesota statutes establish specific requirements for the assessment of property. The law
requires that all real property be valued at market value, which is defined as the usual or most
likely selling price as of the January 2nd assessment date.
The estimated market values established through the 2026 assessment are based upon actual
real estate market trends of Washington County properties from October 1, 2024, through
September 30, 2025. From these trends, our mass appraisal system is used to determine
individual property values. Detailed discussion of the sales analysis can be found in the “Sales
Analysis” section of this report.
The summaries breaking down the adjustments made in each community, by property use, can
be found in the “Past and Current Year Adjustments/Parcel Count” section of this report.
Property owners who have questions or concerns regarding the estimated market value that has
been established for their property are encouraged to contact the property appraiser responsible
for their area. In most cases, an interior inspection of the property will be necessary. For detailed
discussion regarding the appeals period, please refer to the section of this report titled “Other
Assessment Related Information.”
Lisa Young, S.A.M.A.
Washington County Assessor
4 | Page
SALES ANALYSIS SECTION
Sales Analysis
The assessment function is governed by Minnesota State statute. The law requires that all real
property be valued at market value, which is defined as the usual or most likely selling price as of
the assessment date of January 2nd of each year. Assessors are historians and measure the
market based on sales which have occurred previous to the assessment date. Assessors do not
create the value or predict what the market will do; rather, the assessor’s job is to follow the
patterns set by the real estate market.
Information on the sales of real estate is of paramount importance to the assessors in a market-
based property tax system. Sales information is required to be submitted electronically using the
program developed by the Minnesota Department of Revenue. This program is known as the
Electronic Certificate of Real Estate Value (eCRV). The Department of Revenue requires all County
Assessors to utilize a specified time period for sales analysis. This time period of 12 months is
from October 1st through September 30th preceding the assessment date. Sales within this time
period will be used to determine the changes in assessed value that may be needed in each
community for the impending assessment.
For example, the sales that occurred between October 1, 2024, and September 30, 2025, are
used to establish the January 2, 2026, assessed values.
The assessor’s office is charged with setting estimated market values for tax purposes at actual
market value. The relationship between sales prices to estimated market value is called the sales
ratio. The target median ratio range is set by the assessor’s office for all Washington County
communities (for all classes of property); the range established for the 2026 assessment is 93%-
96%. We make every effort to make certain that each municipality in Washington County falls
within this range. In this way, we ensure an equitable distribution of the property tax burden for
all Washington County taxpayers.
Sales Statistics Defined
In addition to the median ratio, we have the ability to measure other statistics to test the accuracy
of the assessment. Some of these are also used at the state level. The primary statistics used are:
Median Ratio
This is a measure of central tendency. The median of a sample is the value for which one-half
(50%) of the observations (when stratified) will lie above that value and one-half will lie below
that value. The median is not susceptible to extreme observations referred to as outliers. We use
this ratio, much like the mean, not only to measure our assessment level, but also to analyze
property values by municipality, type of dwelling and value range. These studies enable us to
track market trends in neighborhoods, popular housing types and classes of property.
5 | Page
Arithmetic Mean Ratio
The mean is the average ratio. Unlike the median, the mean is influenced by outliers. We use this
ratio not only to measure our assessment level, but also to analyze property values by
municipality, type of dwelling and value range. These studies enable us to track market trends in
neighborhoods, popular housing types and classes of property.
Within the county, we strive to achieve a ratio within the 93%-96% range for the median and
mean. This allows us a margin to account for a fluctuating market and still maintain ratios within
state mandated guidelines.
Coefficient of Dispersion (COD)
The COD is used to measure the accuracy of the assessment. The COD indicates the spread of the
ratios from the mean or median ratio. The goal of a good assessment is a COD of 10 to 20. A COD
under 10 is considered excellent and anything over 20 will result in an assessment review by the
Department of Revenue.
Price-Related Differential (PRD)
The PRD is used to measure value related inequities in the assessment, referred to as regressivity
or progressivity. Appraised values are regressive if high value properties are under appraised
relative to low value properties and progressive if high value properties are over appraised
relative to the low value properties. The PRD is found by taking the mean (average) ratio of the
sample and dividing it by the weighted (aggregate) mean ratio. The acceptable range is .98 to
1.03.
6 | Page
Arm’s-Length Transactions
The Department of Revenue requires all County Assessors to utilize a specified time period in
their sales analysis. This time period is 12 months from October 1st through September 30th,
preceding the January 2nd assessment date. Sales within this time period will be used to
determine the changes in the prior years assessed values in each community for the impending
assessment.
The sales that occur within this October 1st through September 30th time period, each year, are
closely scrutinized by the appraisers within the Assessor Division. Evidence suggesting a forced
sale, foreclosure, a sale to a relative, or anything other than an arm’s-length transaction requires
the sales to be disqualified from the sales study. This is important, because the real estate sales
information constitutes the statistical basis for determining the annual adjustments that are
made to the valuation models.
An arm’s-length transaction is any transaction in which buyers and sellers of a product act
independently and have no relationship to each other. The concept of an arm's-length
transaction is to ensure that both parties in the deal are acting in their own self-interest and are
not subject to any pressure or duress from the other party.
The following graphs and charts show the number of arm’s-length transactions that occurred
within each sales period.
Sales Period
10/1/20 -
9/30/21
10/1/21 -
9/30/22
10/1/22 -
9/30/23
10/1/23 -
9/30/24
10/1/24 -
9/30/25
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026
Apartment 10 6 5 7 12
Commercial 61 59 44 50 30
Residential 4,341 3,810 2,938 2,867 3,193
Single Family 2,996 2,621 1,981 1,989 2,187
Townhome/Condo 1,345 1,189 957 928 1,006
TOTAL 4,412 3,875 2,987 2,924 3,235
7 | Page
Residential/SRR (Seasonal Rec) sales count ay2022-ay2026
Sales Period 10/1/20-
9/30/21
10/1/21-
9/30/22
10/1/22-
9/30/23
10/1/23-
9/30/24
10/1/24-
9/30/25 Difference from
Previous Year
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026
Afton 34 24 20 25 24 -1
Bayport 50 42 33 32 21 -11
Baytown 20 33 18 19 17 -2
Birchwood 12 16 4 11 5 -6
Cottage Grove 585 513 455 407 478 71
Dellwood 18 14 13 18 9 -9
Denmark 10 11 7 8 11 3
Forest Lake 290 300 212 209 195 -14
Grant 51 37 27 32 34 2
Grey Cloud 3 2 2 4 2 -2
Hastings 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hugo 316 315 219 220 274 54
Lake Elmo 172 135 114 133 154 21
Lake St. Croix 12 16 6 13 19 6
Lakeland 25 23 17 10 8 -2
Lakeland Shores 3 3 2 1 2 1
Landfall 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mahtomedi 117 100 67 76 83 7
Marine 14 9 5 14 9 -5
May 30 32 15 28 20 -8
Newport 48 55 32 24 38 14
Oak Park Hgts 55 46 41 39 45 6
Oakdale 404 388 333 310 305 -5
Pine Springs 4 5 1 1 0 -1
St. Mary's Point 5 7 1 3 2 -1
St. Paul Park 84 77 47 45 41 -4
Scandia 69 30 39 28 38 10
Stillwater 363 308 200 233 281 48
Stillwater Twp 22 25 14 13 10 -3
West Lakeland 44 39 20 15 38 23
White Bear Lake 4 1 3 2 0 -2
Willernie 12 13 5 9 6 -3
Woodbury 1,465 1,191 966 885 1,024 139
COUNTY 4,341 3,810 2,938 2,867 3,193 326
8 | Page
Residential Lender-Mediated Sales
Foreclosures
Properties in which the financial institution has repossessed the home from the owner due to
non-payment of mortgage obligations.
Short Sales
Unique arrangements where the financial institution and in-default homeowner work together
in an attempt to sell the home before it is foreclosed upon.
In both situations, lenders are highly motivated “sellers”, which can result in discounted asking
prices as they attempt to move the assets quickly from the balance sheets. Lender mediated sales
are not used in the sales study.
4,341
3,810
2,938 2,867
3,193
22 6 35 29 38
0
500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
3,000
3,500
4,000
4,500
5,000
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026
Comparison of Arm's-Length & Lender-Mediated Sales
ay22-ay26
(Data from pages 7 & 9)
Arm's-Length Sales Lender-Mediated Sales
9 | Page
Residential Lender Mediated Sales Count ay2022-ay2026
Sales Period 10/1/20-
9/30/21
10/1/21-
9/30/22
10/1/22-
9/30/23
10/1/23-
9/30/24
10/1/24-
9/30/25
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026
Afton 0 0 3 0 1
Bayport 1 0 0 0 1
Baytown 0 0 0 0 0
Birchwood 0 0 0 0 2
Cottage Grove 2 1 2 5 6
Dellwood 0 0 0 0 0
Denmark 0 0 1 0 0
Forest Lake 1 2 2 6 2
Grant 2 0 1 1 0
Grey Cloud 0 0 0 1 0
Hastings 0 0 0 0 0
Hugo 2 1 0 0 4
Lake Elmo 0 0 0 0 0
Lake St. Croix 1 0 0 0 1
Lakeland 0 0 3 1 0
Lakeland Shores 0 0 0 0 0
Landfall 0 0 0 0 0
Mahtomedi 0 0 4 0 0
Marine 0 0 1 0 0
May 0 0 1 0 0
Newport 0 0 0 0 3
Oak Park Hgts 0 0 0 0 1
Oakdale 6 0 4 4 3
Pine Springs 0 0 0 0 0
St. Mary's Point 0 0 0 0 0
St. Paul Park 2 0 4 3 1
Scandia 1 0 0 0 1
Stillwater 0 2 2 2 2
Stillwater Twp 1 0 0 1 1
West Lakeland 0 0 1 0 1
White Bear Lake 0 0 0 0 0
Willernie 0 0 0 0 0
Woodbury 3 0 6 5 8
COUNTY 22 6 35 29 38
10 | Page
County Sales Statistics by Classification
The statistics listed for each use (classification) below are measured after the annual adjustments
are applied to each classification of each property.
Apartment Sales Statistics (After Annual Adjustments)
Commercial/Industrial Sales Statistics (After Annual Adjustments)
Residential Sales Statistics (After Annual Adjustments)
Sales Period 10/1/20-
9/30/21
10/1/21-
9/30/22
10/1/22-
9/30/23
10/1/23-
9/30/24
10/1/24-
9/30/25
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026
Number of Sales 10 6 5 7 12
Median 94.5% 94.7% 97.6% 99.3% 95.4%
Mean 92.0% 95.2% 98.2% 96.5% 96.8%
Sales Period 10/1/20-
9/30/21
10/1/21-
9/30/22
10/1/22-
9/30/23
10/1/23-
9/30/24
10/1/24-
9/30/25
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026
Number of Sales 61 59 44 50 30
Median 99.5% 93.9% 94.4% 97.1% 95.6%
Mean 101.9% 94.4% 97.5% 97.0% 91.5%
Sales Period 10/1/20-
9/30/21
10/1/21-
9/30/22
10/1/22-
9/30/23
10/1/23-
9/30/24
10/1/24-
9/30/25
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026
Number of Sales 4,341 3,810 2,938 2,867 3,193
Median 93.8% 93.3% 94.7% 95.0% 95.0%
Mean 94.2% 94.4% 95.1% 95.3% 95.0%
11 | Page
Residential Sales Statistics
The sales statistics (Number of Sales, Low Sale Price, and High Sale Price) are based on data
collected from sales that occurred between October 1, 2024, and September 30, 2025.
The remaining statistics are measured after annual value changes are applied to the going-in ratio
(previous year assessed value/sale price) in each community for the 2026 assessment. The
Department of Revenue uses median sales ratio to analyze the performance of the assessment.
Median sales ratios are calculated when there are at least six sales and ratios are required to be
between 90% to 105%. If there are 30 sales or less in a community, the median sales ratio is the
only statistic deemed reliable.
# of Sales
Median
Sales Ratio COD PRD
Low Sale (no
trend applied)
High Sale (no
trend applied)
Afton 24 95.2%355,000$ 3,500,000$
Bayport 21 95.5%150,000$ 965,250$
Baytown 17 95.1%470,000$ 1,750,000$
Birchwood 5 325,000$ 450,000$
Cottage Grove 478 94.8% 5.48 1.006 185,000$ 985,000$
Dellwood 9 95.8%670,000$ 2,335,000$
Denmark 11 94.7%460,000$ 2,400,000$
Forest Lake 195 95.2% 8.14 1.015 216,000$ 1,700,000$
Grant 34 95.5% 11.53 1.047 385,000$ 2,160,000$
Grey Cloud 2 310,000$ 670,000$
Hastings 0 -$ -$
Hugo 274 95.0% 6.79 1.018 170,000$ 2,150,000$
Lake Elmo 154 95.3% 7.67 1.010 255,000$ 1,799,000$
Lake St. Croix 19 95.1%165,000$ 1,125,000$
Lakeland 8 95.0%355,000$ 1,150,000$
Lakeland Shores 2 470,500$ 610,000$
Landfall 0 -$ -$
Mahtomedi 83 94.4% 9.84 1.038 259,900$ 1,470,000$
Marine 9 95.6%320,000$ 1,199,000$
May 20 95.0%469,900$ 1,400,000$
Newport 38 94.8% 7.97 1.011 165,000$ 750,000$
Oak Park Hgts 45 95.2% 7.42 1.004 100,000$ 612,500$
Oakdale 305 95.0% 6.61 1.009 139,900$ 649,900$
Pine Springs 0 -$ -$
St. Mary's Point 2 515,000$ 1,350,000$
St. Paul Park 41 95.2% 6.22 1.005 235,000$ 441,000$
Scandia 38 95.1% 9.23 1.022 300,000$ 1,075,000$
Stillwater 281 94.8% 9.95 1.025 150,000$ 1,535,000$
Stillwater Twp 10 94.7%328,000$ 2,400,000$
West Lakeland 38 95.4% 8.52 1.017 389,000$ 1,340,000$
White Bear Lake 0 -$ -$
Willernie 6 94.9%230,000$ 515,000$
Woodbury 1,024 94.9% 5.79 1.009 147,500$ 1,700,000$
COUNTY 3,193 95.0% 7.14 1.018 100,000$ 3,500,000$
12 | Page
Historic Average Sale Prices: Single Family & Townhome/Condo
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026
Afton 722,300$ 724,500$ 809,500$ 1,025,900$ 1,091,200$
Bayport 361,000$ 436,400$ 424,400$ 576,100$ 444,400$
Baytown 754,000$ 894,000$ 1,031,300$ 1,026,900$ 999,600$
Birchwood 494,800$ 438,800$ 476,300$ 528,300$ 381,900$
Cottage Grove 344,300$ 371,500$ 388,300$ 397,800$ 408,700$
Dellwood 1,100,000$ 1,226,900$ 849,700$ 1,018,400$ 1,096,100$
Denmark 697,300$ 751,800$ 727,800$ 624,300$ 962,100$
Forest Lake 375,900$ 383,600$ 431,200$ 398,200$ 441,100$
Grant 672,700$ 754,200$ 773,500$ 881,400$ 843,400$
Grey Cloud 564,700$ 272,500$ 527,500$ 399,900$ 490,000$
Hastings -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Hugo 449,900$ 392,000$ 403,800$ 411,200$ 414,500$
Lake Elmo 619,000$ 657,300$ 659,600$ 697,600$ 694,800$
Lake St. Croix 354,800$ 411,700$ 419,700$ 354,000$ 441,700$
Lakeland 571,200$ 538,700$ 416,800$ 772,700$ 494,100$
Lakeland Shores 1,004,700$ 502,300$ 530,500$ 353,500$ 540,300$
Landfall -$ -$ -$ -$ -$
Mahtomedi 527,900$ 471,400$ 496,800$ 610,200$ 551,100$
Marine 572,400$ 386,100$ 553,400$ 577,100$ 650,100$
May 691,800$ 754,800$ 800,300$ 765,700$ 815,900$
Newport 304,500$ 357,800$ 354,400$ 348,900$ 420,000$
Oak Park Hgts 284,700$ 337,300$ 343,300$ 332,400$ 361,600$
Oakdale 288,000$ 320,500$ 329,200$ 333,600$ 344,400$
Pine Springs 663,700$ 648,000$ 619,900$ 645,500$ -$
St. Mary's Point 544,000$ 429,300$ 380,000$ 626,700$ 932,500$
St. Paul Park 267,000$ 286,400$ 296,500$ 288,600$ 318,500$
Scandia 499,100$ 578,800$ 648,100$ 574,500$ 568,900$
Stillwater 413,300$ 462,700$ 446,100$ 476,900$ 496,400$
Stillwater Twp 802,900$ 696,800$ 811,300$ 827,900$ 925,700$
West Lakeland 695,200$ 841,900$ 776,600$ 927,900$ 773,700$
White Bear Lake 390,600$ 345,000$ 342,100$ 368,800$ -$
Willernie 277,800$ 326,500$ 249,200$ 365,800$ 339,200$
Woodbury 411,600$ 441,000$ 458,800$ 469,000$ 474,600$
COUNTY AVERAGE 410,300$ 437,500$ 447,900$ 471,100$ 478,500$
13 | Page
PAST & CURRENT YEAR ADJUSTMENTS/PARCEL COUNT SECTION
Agricultural Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments
Afton 3,000,200$ 170 170,450,300$ 175,681,500$ 1.3%
Bayport -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.0%
Baytown -$ 42 29,865,000$ 29,462,500$ -1.3%
Birchwood -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.0%
Cottage Grove 125,300$ 135 135,633,100$ 135,615,800$ -0.1%
Dellwood -$ 6 5,187,100$ 5,980,800$ 15.3%
Denmark 210,500$ 335 233,327,300$ 236,564,600$ 1.3%
Forest Lake 219,200$ 148 74,454,300$ 76,078,500$ 1.9%
Grant -$ 132 115,064,400$ 110,732,700$ -3.8%
Grey Cloud -$ 10 5,273,000$ 5,457,100$ 3.5%
Hastings -$ 1 28,500$ 28,500$ 0.0%
Hugo 167,400$ 253 147,046,300$ 148,982,100$ 1.2%
Lake Elmo 373,400$ 105 99,198,600$ 97,952,500$ -1.6%
Lake St. Croix -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.0%
Lakeland -$ 4 2,276,200$ 2,281,100$ 0.2%
Lakeland Shores -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.0%
Landfall -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.0%
Mahtomedi -$ 2 314,200$ 327,400$ 4.2%
Marine -$ 9 5,907,900$ 6,243,500$ 5.7%
May 1,155,300$ 285 191,486,200$ 193,979,400$ 0.7%
Newport -$ 2 8,009,100$ 7,441,500$ -7.1%
Oak Park Hgts -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.0%
Oakdale -$ 4 3,917,100$ 3,935,800$ 0.5%
Pine Springs -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.0%
St. Mary's Point -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.0%
St. Paul Park -$ 57 4,970,600$ 4,122,400$ -17.1%
Scandia 666,100$ 284 144,001,800$ 146,711,500$ 1.4%
Stillwater -$ 4 4,229,600$ 3,663,800$ -13.4%
Stillwater Twp 136,900$ 106 78,796,800$ 81,987,000$ 3.9%
West Lakeland -$ 43 36,753,100$ 37,635,300$ 2.4%
White Bear Lake -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.0%
Willernie -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.0%
Woodbury 479,500$ 76 140,601,400$ 122,312,500$ -13.3%
COUNTY 6,533,800$ 2,213 1,636,791,900$ 1,633,177,800$ -0.6%
ay2026
New Construction
Number of
Parcels
ay2026
Agricultural Value
ay2025
Agricultural Value
ay2026
% Growth
(less NC)
14 | Page
Agricultural Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026 5-Year Change
Afton 21.6% 28.3% -6.7% 9.8% 1.3% 54.3%
Bayport 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Baytown 15.3% 19.3% 3.4% 1.4% -1.3% 38.1%
Birchwood 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Cottage Grove 18.6% 5.0% -1.0% 2.3% -0.1% 24.9%
Dellwood 39.6% 42.7% -1.1% -2.0% 15.3% 94.5%
Denmark 26.9% 12.9% 1.7% 18.1% 1.3% 61.0%
Forest Lake 26.6% 4.1% -1.0% -0.3% 1.9% 31.3%
Grant 29.1% 10.9% -2.1% 1.4% -3.8% 35.6%
Grey Cloud 25.9% 1.7% 1.8% 0.8% 3.5% 33.7%
Hastings 19.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 19.7%
Hugo 22.6% 13.4% -4.7% -1.0% 1.2% 31.5%
Lake Elmo 28.1% 9.4% -1.4% -3.1% -1.6% 31.4%
Lake St. Croix 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Lakeland 15.2% 7.8% 4.6% 16.6% 0.2% 44.4%
Lakeland Shores 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Landfall 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Mahtomedi 25.0% 16.1% -41.7% 19.9% 4.2% 23.5%
Marine 36.5% 3.4% 2.9% 1.7% 5.7% 50.2%
May 29.0% 14.3% -0.2% -5.0% 0.7% 38.8%
Newport 20.9% 22.0% -0.2% -0.1% -7.1% 35.6%
Oak Park Hgts 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Oakdale 15.3% 8.8% -21.5% -43.4% 0.5% -40.3%
Pine Springs 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
St. Mary's Point 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
St. Paul Park 26.4% 19.6% -0.2% 4.4% -17.1% 33.1%
Scandia 30.0% 5.5% 1.2% 2.4% 1.4% 40.5%
Stillwater 16.4% 7.4% 0.0% 0.3% -13.4% 10.7%
Stillwater Twp 23.1% 19.3% 2.5% -5.4% 3.9% 43.4%
West Lakeland 18.9% 5.5% 0.5% 14.5% 2.4% 41.8%
White Bear Lake 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Willernie 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Woodbury 13.6% -4.1% -16.4% 1.5% -13.3% -18.8%
COUNTY 23.7% 10.6% -2.8% 2.8% -0.6% 33.7%
15 | Page
Agricultural Class: Parcel Counts
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026
# Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels
Afton 173 169 171 167 170 3
Bayport 0 0 0 0 0 0
Baytown 46 44 43 43 42 -1
Birchwood 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cottage Grove 160 158 149 150 135 -15
Dellwood 5 5 5 5 6 1
Denmark 333 333 331 339 335 -4
Forest Lake 153 152 149 150 148 -2
Grant 144 142 141 141 132 -9
Grey Cloud 10 10 10 10 10 0
Hastings 1 1 0 0 0 0
Hugo 264 264 262 259 253 -6
Lake Elmo 118 118 118 108 105 -3
Lake St. Croix 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lakeland 4 4 4 4 4 0
Lakeland Shores 0 0 0 0 0 0
Landfall 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mahtomedi 2 2 2 2 2 0
Marine 9 9 9 9 9 0
May 312 311 302 293 285 -8
Newport 3 3 3 3 2 -1
Oak Park Hgts 0 0 0 0 0 0
Oakdale 4 4 4 4 4 0
Pine Springs 0 0 0 0 0 0
St. Mary's Point 0 0 0 0 0 0
St. Paul Park 58 63 58 58 57 -1
Scandia 323 313 311 300 284 -16
Stillwater 4 4 4 4 4 0
Stillwater Twp 109 110 110 106 106 0
West Lakeland 46 45 44 43 43 0
White Bear Lake 0 0 0 0 0 0
Willernie 0 0 0 0 0 0
Woodbury 97 90 90 87 76 -11
COUNTY 2,378 2,354 2,320 2,285 2,212 -73
+/-
16 | Page
Apartment Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments
Afton -$ 2 2,270,000$ 2,270,000$ 0.0%
Bayport -$ 23 27,113,300$ 27,915,400$ 3.0%
Baytown -$ 1 769,700$ 769,700$ 0.0%
Birchwood -$ 0 -$ 0.0%
Cottage Grove 3,429,600$ 54 260,916,200$ 261,705,700$ -1.0%
Dellwood -$ 0 -$ 0.0%
Denmark -$ 1 1,314,700$ 1,293,700$ -1.6%
Forest Lake 4,340,700$ 76 292,518,300$ 286,963,200$ -3.4%
Grant -$ 1 1,530,000$ 1,530,600$ 0.0%
Grey Cloud -$ 0 -$ 0.0%
Hastings -$ 0 -$ 0.0%
Hugo 12,386,800$ 14 57,747,600$ 70,376,700$ 0.4%
Lake Elmo 9,303,000$ 19 130,993,500$ 142,980,100$ 2.0%
Lake St. Croix -$ 1 627,900$ 660,500$ 5.2%
Lakeland -$ 2 973,200$ 978,300$ 0.5%
Lakeland Shores -$ 0 -$ 0.0%
Landfall -$ 0 -$ 0.0%
Mahtomedi 3,786,300$ 20 98,698,200$ 100,449,400$ -2.1%
Marine -$ 2 493,100$ 526,400$ 6.8%
May -$ 0 -$ 0.0%
Newport 4,487,100$ 49 89,529,200$ 91,533,800$ -2.8%
Oak Park Hgts -$ 33 175,952,100$ 186,009,100$ 5.7%
Oakdale 30,267,700$ 60 534,391,000$ 549,646,400$ -2.8%
Pine Springs -$ 0 -$ 0.0%
St. Mary's Point -$ 0 -$ 0.0%
St. Paul Park -$ 32 9,324,000$ 9,899,400$ 6.2%
Scandia -$ 2 -$ 0.0%
Stillwater 3,722,000$ 83 210,543,400$ 206,826,300$ -3.5%
Stillwater Twp -$ 0 -$ 0.0%
West Lakeland -$ 1 976,400$ 965,900$ -1.1%
White Bear Lake -$ 1 14,446,100$ 14,711,800$ 1.8%
Willernie -$ 1 1,096,000$ 1,180,400$ 7.7%
Woodbury 41,293,700$ 81 1,224,077,400$ 1,236,365,900$ -2.4%
COUNTY 113,016,900$ 559 3,136,301,300$ 3,195,558,700$ -1.7%
ay2026
New Construction
Number of
Parcels
ay2026
Apartment Value
ay2025
Apartment Value
ay2026
% Growth
(less NC)
17 | Page
Apartment Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026 5-Year Change
Afton 1.8% 17.3% 2.9% -0.2% 0.0% 21.8%
Bayport 17.0% 7.5% 1.5% -0.1% 3.0% 29.0%
Baytown 8.8% 3.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 12.1%
Birchwood 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Cottage Grove 31.6% 3.5% 0.9% -0.9% -1.0% 34.1%
Dellwood 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Denmark 10.1% 16.4% -3.3% 2.6% -1.6% 24.2%
Forest Lake 18.3% 14.1% -0.3% -6.1% -3.4% 22.6%
Grant 4.6% 23.7% 5.9% 0.9% 0.0% 35.1%
Grey Cloud 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Hastings 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Hugo 17.6% 6.9% 0.0% 1.7% 0.4% 26.6%
Lake Elmo 9.7% 6.4% 1.0% 3.8% 2.0% 23.0%
Lake St. Croix 27.5% 12.0% 1.6% 0.0% 5.2% 46.3%
Lakeland 15.1% 4.6% 5.2% -0.4% 0.5% 25.0%
Lakeland Shores 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Landfall 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Mahtomedi 12.9% 9.4% -0.9% -2.0% -2.1% 17.3%
Marine 15.2% 2.3% 0.0% 0.0% 6.8% 24.3%
May 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Newport 15.3% 18.8% 10.9% -2.2% -2.8% 40.0%
Oak Park Hgts 16.0% 3.2% -0.5% -0.3% 5.7% 24.1%
Oakdale 28.6% 14.7% -0.3% -4.4% -2.8% 35.7%
Pine Springs 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
St. Mary's Point 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
St. Paul Park 22.7% 0.1% 0.0% 0.1% 6.2% 29.1%
Scandia 16.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 16.7%
Stillwater 27.0% 8.3% -0.3% -1.0% -3.5% 30.5%
Stillwater Twp 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
West Lakeland 13.4% 16.4% 5.2% -0.8% -1.1% 33.1%
White Bear Lake 10.6% -8.9% 0.0% 1.0% 1.8% 4.5%
Willernie 11.6% -3.4% 0.0% 0.0% 7.7% 16.0%
Woodbury 16.1% 2.6% 0.0% 0.9% -2.4% 17.2%
COUNTY 19.4% 6.6% 0.3% -1.0% -1.7% 23.6%
18 | Page
Apartment Class: Parcel Counts
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026
# Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels
Afton 2 2 2 2 2 0
Bayport 22 22 22 22 23 1
Baytown 1 1 1 1 1 0
Birchwood 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cottage Grove 44 45 46 47 54 7
Dellwood 0 0 0 0 0 0
Denmark 1 1 1 1 1 0
Forest Lake 73 74 75 76 76 0
Grant 2 1 1 1 1 0
Grey Cloud 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hastings 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hugo 11 11 11 12 14 2
Lake Elmo 10 10 12 17 19 2
Lake St. Croix 1 1 1 1 1 0
Lakeland 2 2 2 2 2 0
Lakeland Shores 0 0 0 0 0 0
Landfall 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mahtomedi 17 19 19 20 20 0
Marine 2 2 2 2 2 0
May 0 0 0 0 0 0
Newport 42 42 44 44 49 5
Oak Park Hgts 33 33 33 33 33 0
Oakdale 56 57 65 61 60 -1
Pine Springs 0 0 0 0 0 0
St. Mary's Point 0 0 0 0 0 0
St. Paul Park 31 31 31 32 32 0
Scandia 3 2 2 2 2 0
Stillwater 80 81 81 83 83 0
Stillwater Twp 0 0 0 0 0 0
West Lakeland 1 1 1 1 1 0
White Bear Lake 1 1 1 1 1 0
Willernie 1 1 1 1 1 0
Woodbury 81 79 76 81 81 0
COUNTY 517 519 530 543 559 16
+/-
19 | Page
Commercial/Industrial Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments
Afton 1,247,800$ 38 51,499,800$ 50,459,900$ -4.4%
Bayport -$ 101 52,938,500$ 53,108,700$ 0.3%
Baytown -$ 12 3,737,300$ 4,052,300$ 8.4%
Birchwood -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.0%
Cottage Grove 9,731,500$ 564 670,228,200$ 674,958,600$ -0.7%
Dellwood -$ 26 20,021,900$ 20,025,400$ 0.0%
Denmark 464,500$ 64 41,427,900$ 42,727,500$ 2.0%
Forest Lake 3,019,700$ 538 375,751,600$ 374,436,100$ -1.2%
Grant -$ 92 26,206,100$ 27,246,100$ 4.0%
Grey Cloud -$ 22 3,842,700$ 3,671,100$ -4.5%
Hastings -$ 5 2,019,500$ 2,019,500$ 0.0%
Hugo 331,900$ 200 214,601,700$ 215,408,800$ 0.2%
Lake Elmo 11,358,400$ 204 262,062,300$ 263,722,900$ -3.7%
Lake St. Croix -$ 9 3,066,700$ 3,042,400$ -0.8%
Lakeland -$ 39 18,770,100$ 18,571,000$ -1.1%
Lakeland Shores 607,400$ 11 3,433,100$ 4,306,300$ 7.7%
Landfall -$ 7 11,702,000$ 12,093,400$ 3.3%
Mahtomedi -$ 69 80,060,200$ 77,971,600$ -2.6%
Marine 158,200$ 17 4,036,800$ 4,151,700$ -1.1%
May -$ 8 3,507,600$ 3,507,600$ 0.0%
Newport 90,800$ 189 105,531,800$ 103,911,600$ -1.6%
Oak Park Hgts 375,400$ 215 286,584,600$ 290,558,900$ 1.3%
Oakdale 3,778,400$ 382 665,397,800$ 669,429,300$ 0.0%
Pine Springs -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.0%
St. Mary's Point -$ 0 -$ -$ 0.0%
St. Paul Park -$ 202 66,346,400$ 72,484,800$ 9.3%
Scandia 422,700$ 76 21,910,500$ 22,776,200$ 2.0%
Stillwater 19,324,600$ 399 469,500,800$ 484,609,600$ -0.9%
Stillwater Twp -$ 6 1,434,900$ 1,761,600$ 22.8%
West Lakeland -$ 32 19,963,400$ 20,491,600$ 2.6%
White Bear Lake -$ 8 8,109,300$ 9,352,400$ 15.3%
Willernie -$ 33 8,019,900$ 8,146,700$ 1.6%
Woodbury 62,541,100$ 731 1,981,929,900$ 2,028,604,500$ -0.8%
COUNTY 113,452,400$ 4,299 5,483,643,300$ 5,567,608,100$ -0.5%
ay2026
New Construction
Number of
Parcels
ay2026
Comm/Ind Value
ay2025
Comm/Ind Value
ay2026
% Growth
(less NC)
20 | Page
Commercial/Industrial Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026 5-Year Change
Afton 14.4% 15.9% 4.6% 0.2% -4.4% 30.6%
Bayport -0.7% 19.7% 0.7% 1.0% 0.3% 20.9%
Baytown 6.0% 31.1% 14.7% 0.0% 8.4% 60.2%
Birchwood 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Cottage Grove 5.1% 27.1% 1.4% -1.2% -0.7% 31.7%
Dellwood 18.3% 15.6% 0.9% 0.0% 0.0% 34.8%
Denmark 5.0% 22.3% -0.5% 2.6% 2.0% 31.4%
Forest Lake 1.0% 21.4% 0.5% -2.2% -1.2% 19.6%
Grant -3.2% 16.4% 0.1% 1.5% 4.0% 18.7%
Grey Cloud 9.7% 8.8% -2.0% 0.0% -4.5% 12.0%
Hastings 0.0% 9.9% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 9.9%
Hugo 5.4% 21.6% -0.2% -2.3% 0.2% 24.6%
Lake Elmo 3.7% 20.0% 2.5% 0.6% -3.7% 23.2%
Lake St. Croix 2.7% 21.9% 5.8% 1.4% -0.8% 31.1%
Lakeland 0.1% 14.6% 0.9% -2.1% -1.1% 12.4%
Lakeland Shores -0.2% 12.5% 1.3% 7.3% 7.7% 28.6%
Landfall 0.0% 22.8% 0.0% -0.8% 3.3% 25.4%
Mahtomedi 5.9% 22.4% 1.0% -1.8% -2.6% 24.9%
Marine -0.5% 13.5% 0.3% 0.0% -1.1% 12.2%
May 10.6% 4.2% 4.3% -7.4% 0.0% 11.8%
Newport 4.1% 23.2% 1.5% 1.8% -1.6% 29.1%
Oak Park Hgts 1.7% 16.1% -1.1% 0.0% 1.3% 17.9%
Oakdale 3.0% 17.7% 0.2% -1.0% 0.0% 19.9%
Pine Springs 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
St. Mary's Point 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%
St. Paul Park 22.0% 41.6% -0.6% 10.4% 9.3% 82.6%
Scandia 6.9% 16.6% 0.1% 0.2% 2.0% 25.9%
Stillwater 1.2% 18.5% 0.1% 4.3% -0.9% 23.2%
Stillwater Twp 7.0% 1.3% 1.6% -9.8% 22.8% 22.8%
West Lakeland 6.8% 23.8% 3.8% 4.8% 2.6% 41.8%
White Bear Lake -0.1% 21.2% 2.6% 11.3% 15.3% 50.3%
Willernie 2.3% 24.7% 0.5% 0.5% 1.6% 29.5%
Woodbury 1.8% 18.2% 0.0% -1.2% -0.8% 18.0%
COUNTY 2.9% 19.8% 0.4% -0.4% -0.5% 22.2%
21 | Page
Commercial/Industrial Class: Parcel Counts
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026
# Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels
Afton 39 38 39 38 38 0
Bayport 107 107 101 101 101 0
Baytown 10 12 12 12 12 0
Birchwood 0 0 0 0 0 0
Cottage Grove 567 568 569 564 564 0
Dellwood 28 26 26 26 26 0
Denmark 65 65 65 65 64 -1
Forest Lake 546 544 540 539 538 -1
Grant 93 93 93 93 92 -1
Grey Cloud 22 22 22 22 22 0
Hastings 5 5 5 5 5 0
Hugo 195 205 202 198 200 2
Lake Elmo 201 204 209 210 204 -6
Lake St. Croix 9 9 9 9 9 0
Lakeland 38 38 38 39 39 0
Lakeland Shores 9 9 9 9 11 2
Landfall 7 7 7 7 7 0
Mahtomedi 77 68 68 69 69 0
Marine 16 16 16 16 17 1
May 8 8 8 8 8 0
Newport 197 197 201 200 189 -11
Oak Park Hgts 220 215 215 215 215 0
Oakdale 393 398 394 386 382 -4
Pine Springs 0 0 0 0 0 0
St. Mary's Point 0 0 0 0 0 0
St. Paul Park 200 201 202 202 202 0
Scandia 75 72 72 71 76 5
Stillwater 394 391 390 400 399 -1
Stillwater Twp 6 6 6 6 6 0
West Lakeland 33 33 34 34 32 -2
White Bear Lake 9 9 9 8 8 0
Willernie 33 33 33 33 33 0
Woodbury 574 577 571 658 731 73
COUNTY 4,176 4,176 4,165 4,243 4,299 56
+/-
22 | Page
Residential/SRR Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments
Afton 9,201,000$ 1,255 825,528,800$ 874,522,600$ 4.8%
Bayport 2,015,900$ 1,054 438,098,400$ 439,931,100$ 0.0%
Baytown 16,040,800$ 895 675,084,700$ 668,364,800$ -3.4%
Birchwood 518,400$ 412 220,074,100$ 231,734,800$ 5.1%
Cottage Grove 106,385,300$ 15,084 5,617,726,500$ 5,864,625,000$ 2.5%
Dellwood 3,553,200$ 496 461,489,800$ 503,499,200$ 8.3%
Denmark 4,571,000$ 747 445,863,000$ 481,092,600$ 6.9%
Forest Lake 25,243,600$ 7,598 2,872,869,000$ 2,932,101,800$ 1.2%
Grant 13,733,800$ 1,776 1,168,294,500$ 1,211,881,800$ 2.6%
Grey Cloud 256,900$ 151 58,156,300$ 57,870,400$ -0.9%
Hastings 4 791,100$ 820,300$ 3.7%
Hugo 68,591,700$ 6,974 2,790,336,700$ 2,882,395,900$ 0.8%
Lake Elmo 96,200,700$ 5,287 2,983,741,600$ 3,171,897,400$ 3.1%
Lake St. Croix 669,000$ 705 178,697,300$ 183,380,900$ 2.2%
Lakeland 391,900$ 782 334,368,800$ 355,868,600$ 6.3%
Lakeland Shores 502,300$ 142 79,767,100$ 82,639,300$ 3.0%
Landfall 1 215,600$ 185,300$ -14.1%
Mahtomedi 5,857,000$ 3,035 1,471,951,800$ 1,519,382,700$ 2.8%
Marine 1,214,600$ 509 207,898,100$ 211,432,200$ 1.1%
May 5,137,400$ 1,436 846,348,300$ 861,693,300$ 1.2%
Newport 1,461,100$ 1,530 476,273,900$ 486,605,600$ 1.9%
Oak Park Hgts 676,900$ 1,564 460,615,500$ 457,734,800$ -0.8%
Oakdale 28,596,100$ 10,067 3,161,007,400$ 3,262,245,500$ 2.3%
Pine Springs 175,700$ 164 84,002,600$ 85,615,200$ 1.7%
St. Mary's Point 875,600$ 295 114,696,200$ 116,712,600$ 1.0%
St. Paul Park 995,800$ 2,064 536,945,400$ 551,283,600$ 2.5%
Scandia 7,603,900$ 2,218 939,989,200$ 962,980,100$ 1.6%
Stillwater 8,135,300$ 7,536 3,164,777,600$ 3,283,037,700$ 3.5%
Stillwater Twp 8,358,200$ 816 523,234,700$ 587,091,700$ 10.6%
West Lakeland 10,995,400$ 1,446 1,055,184,900$ 1,075,132,300$ 0.8%
White Bear Lake 99 34,231,500$ 34,640,900$ 1.2%
Willernie 115,400$ 312 65,117,600$ 70,348,100$ 7.9%
Woodbury 156,050,300$ 27,238 12,065,079,500$ 12,351,917,000$ 1.1%
COUNTY 584,124,200$ 103,692 44,358,457,500$ 45,860,665,100$ 2.1%
ay2026
% Growth
(less NC)
ay2026
New Construction
Number of
Parcels
ay2026
Res/SRR Value
ay2025
Res/SRR Value
23 | Page
Residential/SRR Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026 5-Year Change
Afton 19.1% 14.0% -12.8% 6.1% 4.8% 31.2%
Bayport 15.6% 11.1% -3.8% 6.8% 0.0% 29.8%
Baytown 18.1% 18.4% 0.2% -0.2% -3.4% 33.1%
Birchwood 26.0% -0.8% 2.4% -1.9% 5.1% 30.8%
Cottage Grove 22.2% 9.9% -3.5% 4.1% 2.5% 35.3%
Dellwood 22.5% 8.5% -3.3% -6.8% 8.3% 29.3%
Denmark 25.4% 5.4% -0.2% -4.2% 6.9% 33.3%
Forest Lake 27.1% 4.7% 2.2% 0.3% 1.2% 35.5%
Grant 21.6% 8.1% -3.7% 3.8% 2.6% 32.3%
Grey Cloud 27.2% 0.8% 2.3% 4.3% -0.9% 33.6%
Hastings 19.8% 3.7% -0.2% 0.7% 3.7% 27.7%
Hugo 21.0% 7.0% -4.0% 3.4% 0.8% 28.2%
Lake Elmo 22.1% 3.6% 1.3% 0.7% 3.1% 30.8%
Lake St. Croix 17.3% 10.1% -7.3% 8.8% 2.2% 31.2%
Lakeland 17.1% 5.2% -5.4% 5.8% 6.3% 29.0%
Lakeland Shores 17.3% 4.8% 2.0% -1.7% 3.0% 25.3%
Landfall 3.7% 23.8% 0.0% 1.1% -14.1% 14.6%
Mahtomedi 25.2% 1.5% 1.2% 1.2% 2.8% 32.0%
Marine 32.8% -2.6% 5.6% 5.6% 1.1% 42.5%
May 23.8% 7.8% -8.3% 7.8% 1.2% 32.3%
Newport 20.9% 9.0% -7.1% 8.4% 1.9% 33.1%
Oak Park Hgts 20.0% 5.3% 1.0% 6.3% -0.8% 31.8%
Oakdale 18.1% 8.6% -1.6% 1.3% 2.3% 28.6%
Pine Springs 25.5% 4.4% 3.2% -1.5% 1.7% 33.3%
St. Mary's Point 20.2% 10.8% -1.8% -5.5% 1.0% 24.7%
St. Paul Park 20.0% 4.2% -0.2% 4.2% 2.5% 30.6%
Scandia 24.6% 4.6% -1.7% 3.8% 1.6% 33.0%
Stillwater 18.7% 9.3% -1.6% 0.5% 3.5% 30.4%
Stillwater Twp 20.6% 1.0% 0.5% -0.4% 10.6% 32.2%
West Lakeland 19.5% 13.8% -6.6% 9.2% 0.8% 36.7%
White Bear Lake 24.8% 0.3% 1.6% -0.3% 1.2% 27.7%
Willernie 17.6% -4.5% 0.4% 9.2% 7.9% 30.6%
Woodbury 18.6% 9.3% -3.2% 1.6% 1.1% 27.3%
COUNTY 20.7% 7.9% -2.4% 2.3% 2.1% 30.5%
24 | Page
Residential/SRR Class: Parcel Counts
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026
# Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels # Parcels
Afton 1,266 1,255 1,256 1,255 1,255 0
Bayport 1,026 1,023 1,019 1,019 1,054 35
Baytown 856 872 874 894 895 1
Birchwood 413 415 414 414 412 -2
Cottage Grove 13,875 14,177 14,439 14,706 15,084 378
Dellwood 509 506 506 505 496 -9
Denmark 742 744 747 743 747 4
Forest Lake 7,386 7,381 7,403 7,560 7,598 38
Grant 1,753 1,755 1,752 1,751 1,776 25
Grey Cloud 151 151 151 151 151 0
Hastings 3 4 4 4 4 0
Hugo 6,425 6,468 6,618 6,888 6,974 86
Lake Elmo 4,872 4,902 4,947 5,151 5,287 136
Lake St. Croix 714 714 714 707 705 -2
Lakeland 788 787 786 784 782 -2
Lakeland Shores 144 144 144 144 142 -2
Landfall 1 1 1 1 1 0
Mahtomedi 3,010 3,011 3,015 3,034 3,035 1
Marine 510 511 510 511 509 -2
May 1,429 1,427 1,429 1,426 1,436 10
Newport 1,424 1,421 1,414 1,413 1,530 117
Oak Park Hgts 1,558 1,557 1,553 1,565 1,564 -1
Oakdale 9,633 9,690 9,749 9,931 10,067 136
Pine Springs 164 164 164 164 164 0
St. Mary's Point 307 301 299 296 295 -1
St. Paul Park 1,991 1,982 1,983 2,001 2,064 63
Scandia 2,205 2,198 2,206 2,208 2,218 10
Stillwater 7,502 7,504 7,503 7,548 7,536 -12
Stillwater Twp 812 811 812 815 816 1
West Lakeland 1,438 1,442 1,446 1,446 1,446 0
White Bear Lake 99 99 99 99 99 0
Willernie 311 311 311 312 312 0
Woodbury 25,270 26,136 26,357 27,022 27,238 216
COUNTY 98,587 99,864 100,625 102,468 103,692 1,224
+/-
25 | Page
Total Taxable Class Summary: Current Year Adjustments
Afton 13,449,000$ 1,465 1,049,748,900$ 1,102,934,000$ 3.8%
Bayport 2,015,900$ 1,178 518,150,200$ 520,955,200$ 0.2%
Baytown 16,040,800$ 950 709,456,700$ 702,649,300$ -3.2%
Birchwood 518,400$ 412 220,074,100$ 231,734,800$ 5.1%
Cottage Grove 119,671,700$ 15,837 6,684,504,000$ 6,936,905,100$ 2.0%
Dellwood 3,553,200$ 528 486,698,800$ 529,505,400$ 8.1%
Denmark 5,246,000$ 1,147 721,932,900$ 761,678,400$ 4.8%
Forest Lake 32,823,200$ 8,360 3,615,593,200$ 3,669,579,600$ 0.6%
Grant 13,733,800$ 2,001 1,311,095,000$ 1,351,391,200$ 2.0%
Grey Cloud 256,900$ 183 67,272,000$ 66,998,600$ -0.8%
Hastings -$ 9 2,839,100$ 2,868,300$ 1.0%
Hugo 81,477,800$ 7,441 3,209,732,300$ 3,317,163,500$ 0.8%
Lake Elmo 117,235,500$ 5,615 3,475,996,000$ 3,676,552,900$ 2.4%
Lake St. Croix 669,000$ 715 182,391,900$ 187,083,800$ 2.2%
Lakeland 391,900$ 827 356,388,300$ 377,699,000$ 5.9%
Lakeland Shores 1,109,700$ 153 83,200,200$ 86,945,600$ 3.2%
Landfall -$ 8 11,917,600$ 12,278,700$ 3.0%
Mahtomedi 9,643,300$ 3,126 1,651,024,400$ 1,698,131,100$ 2.3%
Marine 1,372,800$ 537 218,335,900$ 222,353,800$ 1.2%
May 6,292,700$ 1,729 1,041,342,100$ 1,059,180,300$ 1.1%
Newport 6,039,000$ 1,770 679,344,000$ 689,492,500$ 0.6%
Oak Park Hgts 1,052,300$ 1,812 923,152,200$ 934,302,800$ 1.1%
Oakdale 62,642,200$ 10,513 4,364,713,300$ 4,485,257,000$ 1.3%
Pine Springs 175,700$ 164 84,002,600$ 85,615,200$ 1.7%
St. Mary's Point 875,600$ 295 114,796,200$ 116,712,600$ 0.9%
St. Paul Park 995,800$ 2,355 617,586,400$ 637,790,200$ 3.1%
Scandia 8,692,700$ 2,580 1,105,901,500$ 1,132,467,800$ 1.6%
Stillwater 31,181,900$ 8,022 3,849,051,400$ 3,978,137,400$ 2.5%
Stillwater Twp 8,495,100$ 928 603,466,400$ 670,840,300$ 9.8%
West Lakeland 10,995,400$ 1,522 1,112,877,800$ 1,134,225,100$ 0.9%
White Bear Lake -$ 108 56,786,900$ 58,705,100$ 3.4%
Willernie 115,400$ 346 74,233,500$ 79,675,200$ 7.2%
Woodbury 260,364,600$ 28,126 15,411,688,200$ 15,739,199,900$ 0.4%
COUNTY 817,127,300$ 110,762 54,616,186,700$ 56,257,009,700$ 1.5%
ay2026
New Construction
Number of
Parcels
ay2026
Total Value
ay2025
Total Value
ay2026
% Growth
(less NC)
26 | Page
Total Taxable Class: Past & Current Year Adjustments
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026 5-Year Change
Afton 19.3% 16.1% -11.1% 6.3% 3.8% 34.4%
Bayport 13.9% 11.8% -3.0% 5.8% 0.2% 28.6%
Baytown 17.9% 18.5% 0.4% -0.2% -3.2% 33.4%
Birchwood 26.0% -0.8% 2.4% -1.9% 5.1% 30.8%
Cottage Grove 20.9% 10.9% -2.8% 3.3% 2.0% 34.3%
Dellwood 22.5% 9.0% -3.1% -6.5% 8.1% 30.0%
Denmark 24.5% 8.4% 0.3% 2.5% 4.8% 40.5%
Forest Lake 23.4% 7.0% 1.7% -0.5% 0.6% 32.2%
Grant 21.7% 8.5% -3.5% 3.5% 2.0% 32.2%
Grey Cloud 26.0% 1.3% 2.0% 3.7% -0.8% 32.2%
Hastings 5.2% 8.0% -0.1% 0.2% 1.0% 14.4%
Hugo 19.8% 8.3% -3.7% 2.8% 0.8% 27.9%
Lake Elmo 20.8% 4.9% 1.3% 0.7% 2.4% 30.0%
Lake St. Croix 17.1% 10.5% -7.0% 8.6% 2.2% 31.4%
Lakeland 16.2% 5.7% -5.0% 5.4% 5.9% 28.2%
Lakeland Shores 16.6% 5.1% 2.0% -1.4% 3.2% 25.4%
Landfall 0.1% 22.8% 0.0% -0.7% 3.0% 25.2%
Mahtomedi 23.7% 2.8% 1.0% 0.9% 2.3% 30.6%
Marine 32.0% -2.1% 5.4% 5.3% 1.2% 41.9%
May 24.7% 9.0% -6.7% 5.2% 1.1% 33.4%
Newport 17.3% 12.3% -3.5% 5.8% 0.6% 32.5%
Oak Park Hgts 13.3% 8.1% 0.0% 3.0% 1.1% 25.4%
Oakdale 16.3% 10.4% -1.3% 0.2% 1.3% 27.0%
Pine Springs 25.5% 4.4% 3.2% -1.5% 1.7% 33.3%
St. Mary's Point 20.2% 10.8% -1.8% -5.5% 0.9% 24.6%
St. Paul Park 20.3% 7.8% -0.3% 4.8% 3.1% 35.8%
Scandia 24.9% 4.9% -1.3% 3.5% 1.6% 33.7%
Stillwater 16.7% 10.3% -1.3% 0.9% 2.5% 29.2%
Stillwater Twp 20.8% 3.1% 0.8% -1.1% 9.8% 33.4%
West Lakeland 19.3% 13.7% -6.2% 9.2% 0.9% 36.9%
White Bear Lake 17.1% 0.2% 1.4% 1.7% 3.4% 23.7%
Willernie 15.9% -1.8% 0.4% 8.0% 7.2% 29.8%
Woodbury 16.0% 9.7% -2.7% 1.2% 0.4% 24.6%
COUNTY 18.9% 9.0% -2.0% 1.8% 1.5% 29.3%
27 | Page
Total Taxable Class: Parcel Counts
28 | Page
Residential/SRR Class: Current Year Value Changes
This table displays a breakdown of the number of value changes by percent change for the
residential and seasonal recreational properties in each community for the 2026 assessment. The
percent change groupings are listed across the top row of the table. For the 2026 assessment,
62.35% are receiving a valuation notice indicating an increase in their property value.
Ov
e
r
1
5
%
De
c
r
e
a
s
e
10
.
1
%
-
15
%
De
c
r
e
a
s
e
5.
1
%
-
10
%
De
c
r
e
a
s
e
.1
%
t
o
5
%
De
c
r
e
a
s
e
No
C
h
a
n
g
e
.1
%
t
o
5
%
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
5.
1
%
-
10
%
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
10
.
1
%
-
15
%
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
Ov
e
r
1
5
%
In
c
r
e
a
s
e
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l
D
e
c
r
e
a
s
e
&
N
o
C
h
a
n
g
e
To
t
a
l
I
n
c
r
e
a
s
e
Afton 2 4 56 61 100 701 192 76 63 1,255 223 1,032
Bayport 3 10 88 555 180 157 11 7 43 1,054 836 218
Baytown 5 28 257 434 51 67 8 14 31 895 775 120
Birchwood - 2 - 3 44 99 216 31 17 412 49 363
Cottage Grove 19 5 327 2,976 1,475 7,818 1,552 149 763 15,084 4,802 10,282
Dellwood 1 1 1 2 32 107 71 235 46 496 37 459
Denmark 1 - 1 - 90 235 314 76 30 747 92 655
Forest Lake 26 5 136 1,464 631 4,628 377 136 195 7,598 2,262 5,336
Grant 3 5 141 609 195 297 388 66 72 1,776 953 823
Grey Cloud 1 - - 101 37 6 2 1 3 151 139 12
Hastings - - - - 3 1 - - - 4 3 1
Hugo 5 19 376 2,435 798 2,634 337 39 331 6,974 3,633 3,341
Lake Elmo 3 6 33 1,045 481 2,398 712 188 421 5,287 1,568 3,719
Lake St. Croix 5 6 5 13 176 433 29 7 31 705 205 500
Lakeland 3 1 3 11 87 43 384 220 30 782 105 677
Lakeland Shores - - - 5 26 40 65 1 5 142 31 111
Landfall - - - - - - 1 - - 1 - 1
Mahtomedi 117 12 85 353 87 1,531 571 186 93 3,035 654 2,381
Marine 10 7 65 56 181 75 70 15 30 509 319 190
May 5 2 12 311 751 245 66 18 26 1,436 1,081 355
Newport 3 10 119 763 218 266 16 13 122 1,530 1,113 417
Oak Park Hgts 2 29 79 526 434 390 98 3 3 1,564 1,070 494
Oakdale 4 13 192 1,734 1,286 6,007 528 62 241 10,067 3,229 6,838
Pine Springs - - - 5 18 138 2 1 - 164 23 141
St. Mary's Point 44 - 5 19 73 122 20 3 9 295 141 154
St. Paul Park 10 - 5 420 644 800 80 24 81 2,064 1,079 985
Scandia 6 2 62 624 465 746 171 66 76 2,218 1,159 1,059
Stillwater 8 2 143 574 728 4,063 1,626 294 98 7,536 1,455 6,081
Stillwater Twp - 2 2 10 86 36 228 291 161 816 100 716
West Lakeland 1 6 24 454 121 700 93 17 30 1,446 606 840
White Bear Lake - - - 4 6 88 1 - - 99 10 89
Willernie 4 1 1 - 78 23 134 54 17 312 84 228
Woodbury 30 3 289 6,465 4,420 14,130 1,026 106 769 27,238 11,207 16,031
COUNTY 321 181 2,507 22,032 14,002 49,024 9,389 2,399 3,837 103,692 39,043 64,649
0.31% 0.17% 2.42% 21.25% 13.50% 47.28% 9.05% 2.31% 3.70% 100.00% 37.65% 62.35%
29 | Page
MARKET VALUE SECTION
Distribution of Market Value by Classification
With new construction included the pattern of change in the county’s total value and
classification value distribution can be seen in the following list of past assessment year data.
Estimated Market
Value (EMV)
*includes new construction
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026
Total EMV $47,713,887,100 $53,051,928,400 $52,840,493,700 $54,615,294,000 $56,257,009,700
Agriculture EMV $1,578,317,900 $1,650,874,300 $1,608,999,100 $1,636,791,900 $1,633,177,800
% of Total 3.3% 3.1% 3.0% 3.0% 2.9%
Apartment EMV $2,492,341,700 $2,840,263,100 $3,012,759,500 $3,136,301,300 $3,195,558,700
% of Total 5.2% 5.4% 5.7% 5.7% 5.7%
Commercial/Industrial
EMV $4,395,244,900 $5,374,873,700 $5,450,273,100 $5,529,171,000 $5,567,608,100
% of Total 9.2% 10.1% 10.3% 10.1% 9.9%
Residential/SRR EMV $39,247,982,600 $43,185,917,300 $42,786,652,200 $44,358,457,500 $45,860,665,100
% of Total 82.3% 81.4% 81.0% 81.2% 81.5%
2.9%
5.7%
9.9%
81.5%
2026 EMV Distribution by Classification
Agriculture Apartment Commercial/Industrial Residential
30 | Page
Median Values
Historical Median Residential Improved Value: Residential/SRR
(Combined Single Family and Townhome/Condo with improvement value ≥ $25,000)
Median %Median %Median %Median %M edian %
ay2022 Change ay2023 Change ay2024 Change ay2025 Change ay2026 Change
Afton 597,000$ 22.1% 697,800$ 16.9% 617,600$ -11.5% 661,000$ 7.0% 676,400$ 2.3%
Bayport 336,400$ 16.7% 375,100$ 11.5% 377,400$ 0.6% 389,700$ 3.3% 386,100$ -0.9%
Baytown 691,900$ 17.4% 837,200$ 21.0% 841,000$ 0.5% 832,600$ -1.0% 822,100$ -1.3%
Birchwood 435,400$ 22.7% 416,700$ -4.3% 437,400$ 5.0% 439,700$ 0.5% 470,700$ 7.1%
Cottage Grove 328,600$ 21.4% 365,200$ 11.1% 354,500$ -2.9% 368,400$ 3.9% 375,900$ 2.0%
Dellwood 804,900$ 17.0% 895,600$ 11.3% 854,200$ -4.6% 772,800$ -9.5% 865,900$ 12.0%
Denmark 612,100$ 31.0% 655,500$ 7.1% 669,000$ 2.1% 643,600$ -3.8% 695,800$ 8.1%
Forest Lake 361,000$ 28.3% 371,500$ 2.9% 383,600$ 3.3% 387,000$ 0.9% 394,800$ 2.0%
Grant 618,400$ 22.8% 676,700$ 9.4% 654,000$ -3.4% 684,700$ 4.7% 693,800$ 1.3%
Grey Cloud 480,500$ 29.4% 478,600$ -0.4% 488,700$ 2.1% 519,600$ 6.3% 512,700$ -1.3%
Hastings
Hugo 379,300$ 22.4% 408,700$ 7.8% 389,400$ -4.7% 408,700$ 5.0% 417,100$ 2.1%
Lake Elmo 553,800$ 20.7% 585,700$ 5.8% 581,700$ -0.7% 585,800$ 0.7% 599,500$ 2.3%
Lake St. Croix 293,700$ 17.5% 325,700$ 10.9% 300,000$ -7.9% 332,600$ 10.9% 341,100$ 2.6%
Lakeland 349,000$ 17.5% 370,500$ 6.2% 337,200$ -9.0% 358,600$ 6.3% 392,400$ 9.4%
Lakeland Shores 418,300$ 16.7% 444,400$ 6.2% 451,400$ 1.6% 437,300$ -3.1% 460,800$ 5.4%
Landfall
Mahtomedi 435,800$ 24.1% 444,100$ 1.9% 450,900$ 1.5% 455,900$ 1.1% 470,800$ 3.3%
Marine 499,600$ 31.5% 477,300$ -4.5% 529,000$ 10.8% 556,100$ 5.1% 556,000$ 0.0%
May 567,200$ 25.5% 621,700$ 9.6% 578,600$ -6.9% 644,400$ 11.4% 651,500$ 1.1%
Newport 285,700$ 24.4% 325,500$ 13.9% 305,100$ -6.3% 327,500$ 7.3% 321,800$ -1.7%
Oak Park Hgts 294,600$ 17.4% 322,400$ 9.4% 321,900$ -0.2% 350,000$ 8.7% 343,100$ -2.0%
Oakdale 315,000$ 19.2% 343,300$ 9.0% 337,800$ -1.6% 342,700$ 1.5% 352,000$ 2.7%
Pine Springs 538,900$ 25.6% 563,400$ 4.5% 582,400$ 3.4% 580,400$ -0.3% 592,000$ 2.0%
St. Mary's Point 402,900$ 20.3% 446,500$ 10.8% 446,000$ -0.1% 403,800$ -9.5% 416,100$ 3.0%
St. Paul Park 266,600$ 20.3% 277,600$ 4.1% 279,500$ 0.7% 291,500$ 4.3% 295,200$ 1.3%
Scandia 476,800$ 27.0% 495,600$ 3.9% 497,600$ 0.4% 522,800$ 5.1% 524,500$ 0.3%
Stillwater 373,800$ 19.3% 409,500$ 9.6% 409,400$ 0.0% 408,000$ -0.3% 424,000$ 3.9%
Stillwater Twp 612,400$ 22.6% 630,500$ 3.0% 644,800$ 2.3% 643,500$ -0.2% 703,700$ 9.4%
West Lakeland 606,500$ 20.5% 695,900$ 14.7% 648,300$ -6.8% 710,100$ 9.5% 715,600$ 0.8%
White Bear Lake 345,500$ 25.0% 345,800$ 0.1% 354,600$ 2.5% 354,600$ 0.0% 356,100$ 0.4%
Willernie 266,200$ 17.6% 254,500$ -4.4% 255,100$ 0.2% 282,800$ 10.9% 301,000$ 6.4%
Woodbury 419,000$ 19.3% 456,600$ 9.0% 441,100$ -3.4% 451,500$ 2.4% 454,400$ 0.6%
COUNTY MEDIAN 384,200$ 21.3% 415,600$ 8.2% 407,900$ -1.9% 417,400$ 2.3% 426,100$ 2.1%
31 | Page
Historical Median Residential Improved Value: Townhomes/Condos
(With improvement value ≥ $25,000)
Median %Median %Median %Median %Median %
ay2022 Change ay2023 Change ay2024 Change ay2025 Change ay2026 Change
Bayport 418,700$ 14.8% 457,600$ 9.3% 443,300$ -3.1% 447,500$ 0.9% 451,800$ 1.0%
Cottage Grove 236,300$ 18.7% 259,300$ 9.7% 248,000$ -4.4% 268,300$ 8.2% 269,300$ 0.4%
Forest Lake 246,300$ 25.2% 261,900$ 6.3% 270,700$ 3.4% 273,000$ 0.8% 271,000$ -0.7%
Hugo 254,800$ 20.2% 280,400$ 10.0% 268,400$ -4.3% 274,400$ 2.2% 270,700$ -1.3%
Lake Elmo 341,800$ 10.4% 375,600$ 9.9% 368,100$ -2.0% 361,000$ -1.9% 376,000$ 4.2%
Mahtomedi 340,600$ 21.0% 334,500$ -1.8% 339,700$ 1.6% 333,500$ -1.8% 337,100$ 1.1%
Marine 291,200$ 32.4% 277,300$ -4.8% 290,900$ 4.9% 363,700$ 25.0% 363,700$ 0.0%
Newport 212,300$ 21.7% 207,100$ -2.4% 229,200$ 10.7% 234,200$ 2.2% 232,200$ -0.9%
Oak Park Hgts 270,200$ 33.6% 245,500$ -9.1% 263,000$ 7.1% 284,300$ 8.1% 284,300$ 0.0%
Oakdale 220,000$ 13.1% 245,500$ 11.6% 242,000$ -1.4% 245,700$ 1.5% 242,000$ -1.5%
St. Paul Park 241,100$ 20.7% 250,400$ 3.9% 239,300$ -4.4% 271,100$ 13.3% 278,700$ 2.8%
Stillwater 299,400$ 13.9% 334,500$ 11.7% 327,000$ -2.2% 327,700$ 0.2% 331,500$ 1.2%
Woodbury 261,900$ 13.0% 290,200$ 10.8% 280,600$ -3.3% 285,800$ 1.9% 287,400$ 0.6%
COUNTY MEDIAN 251,500$ 16.0% 277,200$ 10.2% 271,800$ -1.9% 276,200$ 1.6% 275,800$ -0.1%
32 | Page
Historical Median Residential Improved Value: Single Family
(With improvement value ≥ $25,000)
Median % Median % Median % Median % Median %
ay2022 Change ay2023 Change ay2024 Change ay2025 Change ay2026 Change
Afton 597,000$ 22.1% 697,800$ 16.9% 617,600$ 3.5% 661,000$ 7.0% 676,500$ 2.3%
Bayport 332,300$ 17.3% 368,500$ 10.9% 375,400$ 13.0% 381,300$ 1.6% 377,400$ -1.0%
Baytown 691,900$ 17.4% 837,200$ 21.0% 841,000$ 21.5% 832,600$ -1.0% 822,100$ -1.3%
Birchwood 435,400$ 22.7% 416,700$ -4.3% 437,400$ 0.5% 439,700$ 0.5% 470,700$ 7.1%
Cottage Grove 339,100$ 21.5% 379,200$ 11.8% 369,500$ 9.0% 381,500$ 3.2% 389,700$ 2.1%
Dellwood 804,900$ 17.0% 895,600$ 11.3% 854,200$ 6.1% 772,800$ -9.5% 865,900$ 12.0%
Denmark 612,100$ 31.0% 655,500$ 7.1% 669,000$ 9.3% 643,600$ -3.8% 695,800$ 8.1%
Forest Lake 389,800$ 28.7% 399,800$ 2.6% 413,300$ 6.0% 415,700$ 0.6% 422,800$ 1.7%
Grant 618,400$ 22.8% 676,700$ 9.4% 654,000$ 5.8% 684,700$ 4.7% 693,800$ 1.3%
Grey Cloud 480,500$ 29.4% 478,600$ -0.4% 488,700$ 1.7% 519,600$ 6.3% 512,700$ -1.3%
Hastings
Hugo 450,200$ 21.0% 484,900$ 7.7% 467,400$ 3.8% 478,400$ 2.4% 485,100$ 1.4%
Lake Elmo 563,500$ 21.3% 598,300$ 6.2% 600,100$ 6.5% 603,500$ 0.6% 619,000$ 2.6%
Lake St. Croix 293,700$ 17.5% 325,700$ 10.9% 297,000$ 1.1% 327,900$ 10.4% 336,500$ 2.6%
Lakeland 349,000$ 17.5% 370,500$ 6.2% 337,400$ -3.3% 359,300$ 6.5% 393,300$ 9.5%
Lakeland Shores 418,300$ 16.7% 444,400$ 6.2% 451,400$ 7.9% 437,300$ -3.1% 462,300$ 5.7%
Landfall
Mahtomedi 451,300$ 24.8% 458,500$ 1.6% 467,800$ 3.7% 474,900$ 1.5% 487,200$ 2.6%
Marine 513,900$ 35.3% 495,200$ -3.6% 539,900$ 5.1% 570,400$ 5.6% 564,700$ -1.0%
May 567,200$ 25.5% 621,700$ 9.6% 578,600$ 2.0% 644,400$ 11.4% 651,500$ 1.1%
Newport 289,400$ 26.0% 330,100$ 14.1% 309,500$ 6.9% 331,500$ 7.1% 326,100$ -1.6%
Oak Park Hgts 314,500$ 16.2% 348,500$ 10.8% 346,300$ 10.1% 373,900$ 8.0% 364,200$ -2.6%
Oakdale 340,900$ 19.8% 367,900$ 7.9% 363,400$ 6.6% 367,300$ 1.1% 377,800$ 2.9%
Pine Springs 538,900$ 25.6% 563,400$ 4.5% 582,400$ 8.1% 580,400$ -0.3% 592,000$ 2.0%
St. Mary's Point 402,900$ 20.3% 446,500$ 10.8% 446,000$ 10.7% 403,800$ -9.5% 416,100$ 3.0%
St. Paul Park 268,900$ 21.3% 279,900$ 4.1% 282,400$ 5.0% 293,600$ 4.0% 296,500$ 1.0%
Scandia 476,800$ 27.0% 495,600$ 3.9% 498,100$ 4.5% 522,900$ 5.0% 525,300$ 0.5%
Stillwater 387,600$ 20.4% 422,800$ 9.1% 422,600$ 9.0% 423,300$ 0.2% 439,600$ 3.9%
Stillwater Twp 612,400$ 22.6% 630,500$ 3.0% 644,800$ 5.3% 643,500$ -0.2% 704,300$ 9.4%
West Lakeland 606,500$ 20.5% 695,900$ 14.7% 648,300$ 6.9% 710,100$ 9.5% 715,600$ 0.8%
White Bear Lake 345,500$ 25.0% 345,800$ 0.1% 354,600$ 2.6% 354,600$ 0.0% 356,100$ 0.4%
Willernie 266,200$ 17.6% 254,500$ -4.4% 251,500$ -5.5% 278,000$ 10.5% 301,000$ 8.3%
Woodbury 476,100$ 20.4% 520,000$ 9.2% 503,700$ 5.8% 512,700$ 1.8% 521,800$ 1.8%
COUNTY MEDIAN 425,900$ 22.4% 460,600$ 8.1% 452,200$ 6.2% 463,200$ 2.4% 472,200$ 1.9%
33 | Page
Single Family and Townhome/Condo breakdown (Data from pages 31 & 32)
(With improvement value ≥ $25,000)
Historical County Median Residential Improved Value (Data from page 30)
(Includes both Single Family and Townhome/Condo with improvement value ≥ $25,000)
ay2022
ay2023
ay2024
ay2025
ay2026
$425,900
$460,600
$452,200
$463,200
$472,200
$251,500
$277,200
$271,800
$276,200
$275,800
Median Residential Value by Dwelling Type
Townhome/Condo Single Family
360,000 370,000 380,000 390,000 400,000 410,000 420,000 430,000
ay2022
ay2023
ay2024
ay2025
ay2026
$384,200
$415,600
$407,900
$417,400
$426,100
Median Residential Improved Value
34 | Page
OTHER ASSESSMENT RELATED INFORMATION
New Construction
Current New Construction Starts: All Classifications
SFR TH/Condo Comm/Ind Apartment Exempt Total
Calendar Year 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025 2025
New Starts New Starts New Starts New Starts New Starts New Starts
Afton 9 0 2 0 0 11
Bayport 2 0 0 0 1 3
Baytown 16 0 0 0 0 16
Birchwood 1 0 0 0 0 1
Cottage Grove 252 35 1 0 0 288
Dellwood 2 0 0 0 0 2
Denmark 3 0 0 0 0 3
Forest Lake 59 24 0 0 0 83
Grant 12 0 0 0 1 13
Grey Cloud 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hastings 0 0 0 0 0 0
Hugo 133 0 2 1 0 136
Lake Elmo 163 0 2 2 1 168
Lake St. Croix 1 0 0 0 0 1
Lakeland 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lakeland Shores 0 0 1 0 0 1
Landfall 0 0 0 0 0 0
Mahtomedi 7 0 0 1 0 8
Marine 3 0 0 0 0 3
May 5 0 0 0 0 5
Newport 3 0 0 1 0 4
Oak Park Hgts 0 0 0 0 1 1
Oakdale 59 4 2 1 1 67
Pine Springs 0 0 0 0 0 0
St. Mary's Point 1 0 0 0 0 1
St. Paul Park 1 0 0 0 0 1
Scandia 10 0 0 0 0 10
Stillwater 5 0 2 1 1 9
Stillwater Twp 6 0 0 0 0 6
West Lakeland 6 0 0 0 0 6
White Bear Lake 0 0 0 0 0 0
Willernie 0 0 0 0 0 0
Woodbury 214 78 6 3 3 304
COUNTY 973 141 18 10 9 1,151
35 | Page
Past & Current New Construction Starts: Single Family and Townhome/Condo
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
New Starts New Starts New Starts New Starts New Starts
Afton 19 11 7 3 9
Bayport 8 14 3 1 2
Baytown 9 12 18 16 16
Birchwood 1 0 2 1 1
Cottage Grove 536 406 307 335 287
Dellwood 2 3 0 1 2
Denmark 15 6 3 7 3
Forest Lake 41 34 19 94 83
Grant 19 14 7 7 12
Grey Cloud 0 0 0 0 0
Hastings 0 0 0 0 0
Hugo 197 110 119 170 133
Lake Elmo 326 162 202 96 163
Lake St. Croix 0 1 0 1 1
Lakeland 1 0 2 0 0
Lakeland Shores 0 1 1 0 0
Landfall 0 0 0 0 0
Mahtomedi 6 6 14 4 7
Marine 5 6 2 2 3
May 3 8 4 15 5
Newport 70 10 6 0 3
Oak Park Hgts 5 1 0 2 0
Oakdale 24 69 48 94 63
Pine Springs 0 0 0 0 0
St. Mary's Point 2 0 0 0 1
St. Paul Park 1 1 6 4 1
Scandia 20 21 10 9 10
Stillwater 39 26 11 7 5
Stillwater Twp 6 1 4 3 6
West Lakeland 18 6 2 4 6
White Bear Lake 0 0 0 0 0
Willernie 2 3 0 0 0
Woodbury 533 352 482 470 292
COUNTY 1,908 1,284 1,279 1,346 1,114
Calendar Year
36 | Page
Historical New Construction Summary: All Classifications
New
Construction
Reviews
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026
Single Family 1,592 1,066 975 1,122 973
Townhome /
Condo 316 218 304 224 141
Apartment 4 9 7 4 10
Commercial /
Industrial 18 23 16 15 18
Misc. Permits 3,527 3,601 2,916 3,607 3,429
TOTAL 5,457 4,917 4,218 4,972 4,571
Taxable Value
Added $987,855,900 $1,121,556,700 $897,986,300 $889,609,200 $817,127,300
Historical Comparison of New Construction: ay22–ay26
0 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000
ay2022
ay2023
ay2024
ay2025
ay2026
5,457
4,917
4,218
4,972
4,571
New Construction Reviews
(New Starts & Misc. Permit)
37 | Page
Appraiser Activity: Permit & Quintile Review Counts
Current state law mandates that all property must be re-assessed each year and reviewed once
every five years (aka quintile). Staff also inspect properties that have taken out a construction
permit during the course of the year.
During 2025 (for the 2026 assessment), the Assessor Division appraisers and locally hired
assessors reviewed 31,297 properties. Below is the breakdown of the properties that were
reviewed over the last five years.
2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
ay2022 ay2023 ay2024 ay2025 ay2026
Residential Quintile 23,008 22,605 21,696 21,130 25,609
Apt/CI Reviews 499 1,240 1,320 927 1,098
New Construction Reviews 5,457 4,917 4,218 4,972 4,580
Misc Reviews 1,494 2 1,474 0 10
TOTAL 30,458 28,764 28,708 27,029 31,297
38 | Page
Appraiser Activity: Tax Petition Related
Minnesota Tax Court has been established by the Minnesota Legislature for the purpose of
hearing only tax related cases. The Court’s judges have expertise in tax laws and apply that
knowledge in a manner to ensure that taxpayers are assessed in a fair and equitable way.
The tax petition process is a complicated and ever-changing part of our business. The entire
process continues to consume a large amount of our Commercial/Industrial/Apartment appraiser
workload.
The table below provides a summary of the petition filings in Washington County over the last
five payable years. Petitions related to taxes payable in 2025 decrease slightly in the number of
petitions filed by 10 petitions. There was an increase in the number of residential petition filings.
The total value under petitions filed for pay2025 increased roughly 3.2% when compared to the
previous year.
Number of Petitions Filed
Payable Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Residential 5 6 4 5 10
Commercial/Industrial 179 149 114 175 166
Apartment 17 15 37 50 44
TOTAL 201 170 155 230 220
Value Under Petitions Filed
Payable Year 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025
Residential $4,333,700 $7,242,400 $3,474,200 $44,469,400 $58,361,900
Commercial/Industrial $1,336,984,000 $1,228,442,100 $925,542,600 $1,405,576,500 $1,502,309,100
Apartment $345,661,300 $278,996,400 $1,021,577,000 $1,292,952,800 $1,269,746,700
TOTAL $1,686,979,000 $1,514,680,900 $1,950,593,800 $2,742,998,700 $2,830,417,700
39 | Page
Tax Petitions for Payable Years 2021-2025
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Pay 2021 Pay 2022 Pay 2023 Pay 2024 Pay 2025
5 6 4 5 10
179
149
114
175 166
17 15
37
50 44
Number of Petitions Filed (by classification)
Residential Commercial/Industrial Apartment
Pay 2021
Pay 2022
Pay 2023
Pay 2024
Pay 2025
$1,686,979,000
$1,514,680,900
$1,950,593,800
$2,742,998,700
$2,830,417,700
Value Under Petitions Filed (all classifications)
40 | Page
Assessment Process: Statutory Requirements
Minnesota law establishes specific requirements for the entire property tax system, including the
assessment of property (M.S. Chapter 273). These requirements have not changed during the
past year. The laws require the following:
1. All real property is to be valued at market value, which is defined as the usual or most
likely selling price at the time of assessment. Special qualified exclusions such as the
Veterans’ Exclusion are subtracted from the market value to arrive at the taxable value.
2. Property is classified according to state law, and the tax capacity is calculated.
3. The tax capacity is multiplied by the tax rate (the total of county, school, city, and
miscellaneous levies) to determine the amount of property tax.
The annual property assessment focuses on the very first step of this process - establishing an
estimated market value for each parcel of property.
Market values are assessed locally by either a county employed appraiser or a locally hired
assessor. The work of both county and local assessors is monitored by the County Assessor,
whose work is in turn monitored by the Minnesota Department of Revenue. The monitoring
agency is authorized by law to adjust the property assessment to help ensure county-wide and
state-wide equalization of property assessments.
The County Assessor has established the standard that all Washington County communities, with
at least six (6) sales in their sales study, have a community median ratio in the range of 93%-96%
of actual market values in relationship to time-adjusted sales prices. At times, local assessment
levels have been adjusted by the County Assessor or the State of Minnesota.
State law also requires that each individual property be reviewed by the assessor at least once
every five years. Each community has a rotating revaluation schedule to ensure that this
requirement is met.
What is market value?
Minnesota Statue 273.03 defines market value as “… the usual selling price at the time of
assessment.” The Assessor’s Office works throughout the year to estimate market values of each
property for the following January 2nd assessment date.
41 | Page
How is market value determined?
Review Property: Approximately every fifth year, an appraiser working under the supervision of
the County Assessor will review the property. Any property that had a building permit issued in
a given year is reviewed and the new value is calculated as of January 2nd following the
construction.
Gather Information: The appraiser gathers information on all characteristics of the property that
affect market value, such as size, age, quality of construction, basement finish, and extra features,
such as fireplaces, walk-out basements, et cetera.
Compute Value: The characteristics are entered into a computerized system (CAMA). Information
on actual market sales is used to establish the building and component rates used to calculate
the property’s market value. The market value estimated by the appraiser should be very close
to the amount the property would sell for, if placed on the open market.
Why may market value change from year to year?
Property values change continuously depending on the economic conditions affecting the local
market. In addition to market changes, physical changes made to a property can also affect its
market value. All factors are considered in estimating the value of property.
42 | Page
Appeals Process
In Minnesota, property tax laws provide the legal parameters that govern the work of assessors.
These statutes lay down a cycle of assessment activities that are conducted on an annual basis.
Each year, assessors are required to work on a number of tasks that include listing, valuing, and
classifying all taxable properties; processing both real and personal property transfers; analyzing
market data; monitoring assessment levels for several different classes of property; and
arranging and conducting an appeals process.
The latter of these activities is a key part of the assessment cycle that provides property owners
with an opportunity to review and, if necessary, challenge their estimate of market value and/or
classification that will be used for taxation purposes in the following year.
At what point in the assessment cycle does the appeals process begin?
The appeals process begins in March and extends through June. When property owners receive
their Valuation Notices during the month of March, they should read them carefully for
instructions about deadlines, filing procedures, meeting dates and times. If they are not clear,
they should call the assessor’s office for clarification and additional information because a missed
deadline, an incorrect filing, or the failure to attend a scheduled meeting can cause an appeal to
be dismissed.
What steps should property owners take to appeal their assessments?
There are two avenues of appeal that property owners may take to challenge their assessments.
The first route is referred to as the three-step appeal and the second is known as the one-step
appeal. These steps are illustrated in the flow chart on the following page.
How should property owners begin their appeal?
Property owners are encouraged to contact their appraiser to discuss their property assessment
concerns. An informal meeting can be scheduled to review the property, examine market data,
answer questions, and clarify the valuation and classification practices used. This discussion can
also be handled by telephone, mail, or email during regular business hours.
43 | Page
Appeals Process: What are the options?
Appeal to your Local Board of Appeal & Equalization (LBAE) or attend one of three regional
Open Book meetings (meeting times & locations are listed on your valuation notice).
•Appeal in person, by letter, or by designated representative.
•If your appeal is not addressed to your satisfaction, or you and the County staff
cannot agree to a change in valuation or classification, continue to the next step.
Appeal to the Washington County Board of Appeal & Equalization (CBAE).
•You must have first appealed to your LBAE (unless your property is in an Open Book
community) Check your valuation notice to verify.
•The CBAE meets in June - Call the Assessor’s Office at 651-430-6175 by
May 1, 2026, to make an appointment.
•If you still do not feel your concerns have been addressed to your satisfaction, you
may next appeal to the Minnesota Tax Court.
Appeal in the Minnesota Tax Court
•Appeals may be filed up until April 30th of the year when the taxes are due.
•The Tax Court can be contacted at 651-539-3260 for more information on procedures, forms, and
filing fees.
Regular Division
•Can be used for any property type
•Must be used for property assessed >
$300,000
•Can be appealed to the Supreme Court
Small Claims Division
•All homestead property
1 unit/parcel/petition
•Homestead classifications
•Assessed < $300,000
•All decisions are final
First Contact the County Assessor’s Office or your Local Assessor 651-430-6175.
•Discuss your concerns with the assessor or an appraiser.
•Compare values of neighboring or similar properties.
•Review local comparable sales information.
•If you and your assessor or the County staff do not agree, continue below:
Ap
p
e
a
l
d
i
r
e
c
t
l
y
t
o
T
a
x
C
o
u
r
t
(
O
n
e
-St
e
p
A
p
p
e
a
l
)
44 | Page
Property Tax Calendar
45 | Page
46 | Page
2026 Local Board & Open Book Meeting Schedule
City/Township Format Meeting Date Time Location
Mahtomedi
Local Board
Wednesday, April 1, 2026 5:00 PM Mahtomedi City Hall | 600 Stillwater Rd
Hugo Thursday, April 2, 2026 5:30 PM Hugo City Hall | 14669 Fitzgerald Ave N
Baytown Monday, April 6, 2026 4:00 PM Baytown Community Center | 4020 McDonald Dr N
Marine on St Croix Tuesday, April 7, 2026 9:00 AM Marine on St Croix City Hall | 121 Judd St
Denmark Tuesday, April 7, 2026 4:30 PM Denmark Town Hall | 14008 90th St S
Birchwood Tuesday, April 7, 2026 6:00 PM Birchwood Village City Hall | 207 Birchwood Ave
Scandia Monday, April 13, 2026 5:00 PM Scandia Community Center | 14727 209th St N
Forest Lake Monday, April 13, 2026 5:00 PM Forest Lake City Hall | 1408 Lake St S
Dellwood Tuesday, April 14, 2026 4:00 PM Dellwood City Hall | 111 Wildwood Rd
Lake Elmo Tuesday, April 14, 2026 4:30 PM Lake Elmo City Hall | 3880 Laverne Ave N
May Wednesday, April 15, 2026 9:00 AM May Town Hall | 13939 Norell Ave N
Willernie Monday, April 20, 2026 5:30 PM Willernie City Hall | 111 Wildwood Rd
Afton
Open Book
May attend any one of three Regional Open Book meetings
NOTE: The Oakdale City Hall & Woodbury City Hall meeting locations have been replaced by
one meeting at the new Central Service Center, in Woodbury
Bayport
Cottage Grove
Grant
Grey Cloud Island Township
Hastings Regional Open Book-Cottage Grove Cottage Grove Service Center
Lake St Croix Beach Thursday April 2, 2026 5-7 PM 13000 Ravine Parkway
Lakeland Room 150
Lakeland Shores
Landfall Regional Open Book-Woodbury Central Service Center
Newport Thursday April 16, 2026 5-7 PM 1261 Woodlane Dr
Oak Park Heights Room F201
Oakdale
Pine Springs Regional Open Book-Stillwater Washington Cty Govt Center
St Mary's Point Wednesday April 22, 2026 2-7 PM 14949 62nd St N
St Paul Park 5th Floor - Rm 5599
Stillwater City
Stillwater Township
West Lakeland
White Bear Lake
Woodbury
Govt Center County Board Tuesday, June 16, 2026 5:00 PM **By Appointment
Govt Center Tuesday, June 23, 2026 11:00 AM (times subject to change)
**Appointment deadline for County Board Friday May 1, 2026
City of Hugo Claims
March 16, 2026 G. 1
Vendor Invoice Amount Description Department
Abdo Financial Solutions LLC 519430 3,210.00$ Accounting Assistance Finance Dept
Allstream 22210026 226.56$ Fax Line Administration
Baller, Scott CLAIM 125.00$ MN DOLI Registration - Spring Seminar Registration Building Inspections
Batteries Plus Bulbs #031 P89573475 383.80$ Batteries - LED Speed Sign Street Dept
Bieniek, Bob CLAIM 376.68$ MSFCA Leadership Academy Lodging Fire Dept
Bieniek, Bob CLAIM 215.60$ MSFCA Leadership Academy Mileage Fire Dept
Bound Tree Medical LLC 86099861 665.91$ AED Heart Smart Pads Fire Dept
Bound Tree Medical LLC 86099861 31.56$ Medical Supplies Fire Dept
Catalyst Graphics Inc 48318 538.00$ Utility Bill Envelopes Water & Sewer
Century Link 651 429-3212 80.53$ Fire Station Phone Lines Fire Dept
Comcast 2/18/2026 274.14$ Business Internet (thru March 27) Fire Dept
Comcast 2/22/2026 25.19$ Business Cable (thru March 21) Administration
Companion Animal Control LLC February 1,351.70$ Callout Fees & Mileage Animal Control
Companion Animal Control LLC February 1,175.00$ Boarding & Rescue Fees Animal Control
Frattallone's Hardware Store 152651/B 225.00$ Blade Sharpening - Unit #350-24 Street Dept
H & L Mesabi 16060 700.00$ Parts - Unit #204-14 Street Dept
Home Depot Credit Services 512923 65.59$ Painting Supplies - RLC Gen Gov't Bldgs
Home Depot Credit Services 512923 13.59$ Parts - Unit #125-26 Parks Dept
Home Depot Credit Services 512923 5.68$ Shop Supplies Public Works
Home Depot Credit Services 513835 54.17$ Shop Tools Public Works
Home Depot Credit Services 5081409 46.59$ Parts - Unit #125-26 Parks Dept
Home Depot Credit Services 7513200 101.82$ Trash Bags Parks Dept
Home Depot Credit Services 7513200 13.88$ Hardware for Net Repairs Parks Dept
Home Depot Credit Services 7515137 34.65$ Shop Tools Public Works
Innovative Office Solutions LLC IN5060877 5.16$ Pens Public Works
Instrumental Research, Inc. 6960 135.00$ Water Bacteria Testing Water Utility
Jefferson Fire & Safety Inc IN336327 1,045.09$ Fire Hoses (6) Fire Dept
Jefferson Fire & Safety Inc IN337032 209.78$ Faceshield Bracket Kits Fire Dept
Johnson Controls Fire Protection LP 25213806 1,637.61$ Alarm Testing & Inspection Gen Gov't Bldgs
Johnson/Turner January 5,300.00$ Prosecution Fees (Flat Fee) General Legal
Johnson/Turner January 323.95$ Disbursements (Prosecution Costs) General Legal
Johnson/Turner January 6,178.50$ Civil Legal Fees - See Attached Breakdown General Legal
Kendell Doors & Hardware LLC IN126768 506.00$ Service Door Repairs - PW Public Works
Kieffer, Rick CLAIM 329.96$ MRWA Conference - Lodging Water & Sewer
Kieffer, Rick CLAIM 193.11$ Denim Jean Reimbursement Parks Dept
Kieffer, Rick CLAIM 170.99$ Work Boot Reimbursement Parks Dept
L.T.G. Power Equipment 300986 25.35$ Parts - Unit #6109-A Fire Dept
Laughlin's Pest Control 76340 100.68$ February Pest Control Service Gen Gov't Bldgs
Legacy Sorbents & Supply Company 13997 162.00$ Spill Absorbent Public Works
Libke, Mason CLAIM 50.00$ Building Inspector Exam - MN DOLI Building Inspections
Libke, Mason CLAIM 47.46$ Rain Boot Reimbursement Building Inspections
Lincoln National Life Insurance Co. March 965.08$ Disability Premium Finance Dept
Macqueen Emergency P61935 459.13$ Citro Squeeze Laundry Soap Fire Dept
Marco INV14963835 77.54$ March Copier Maintenance Building Inspections
Metering & Technology Solutions INV9930 3,525.72$ Water Meter & Hardware Water Utility
Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0226HH02 788.67$ February Cleaning Services Gen Gov't Bldgs
Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0226HH03 119.99$ February Cleaning Services - Hanifl Parks Dept
Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0226HH04 780.00$ February Cleaning Services - PW Facility Public Works
Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0226HH04 485.33$ February Cleaning Services Fire Dept
Minnesota Cleaning Services Inc 0226HH04 260.00$ February Cleaning Services - Rice Lake Room Gen Gov't Bldgs
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency SA-2249 23.00$ Wastewater Certification Renewal - Smith Sewer Utility
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Registration 195.00$ Wastewater Pump Workshop - Christiansen Sewer Utility
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Registration 195.00$ Wastewater Pump Workshop - Kieffer Sewer Utility
Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Registration 195.00$ Wastewater Pump Workshop - Klein Sewer Utility
Mountain Hi Truck & Equipment LLC 86534 7,000.00$ Replacement Water Tank - Unit #208-97 (25% Down) Street Dept
Municipal Emergency Services Inc - MES IN2434790 424.00$ Silv-Ex Plus Foam Fire Dept
North Central Bus & Equipment 560172 440.35$ Parts - Unit #122-24 Water & Sewer
North Central Bus & Equipment 560172 440.35$ Parts - Unit #125-26 Parks Dept
Oxygen Service Company 3643353 144.75$ Welding Supplies Public Works
Performance Plus LLC 2062037 61.00$ Mask Fittings - Courneya Fire Dept
Performance Plus LLC 2062035 61.00$ Mask Fittings - Del Pino Fire Dept
Pomp's Tire Service Inc 150199710 3,536.52$ Rims & Installation - Unit #326-11 Street Dept
Ricoh USA, Inc 109830680 194.61$ February Copier Lease Payment Public Works
Schwaab, Inc 4894295 42.50$ Notary Stamp - Michele Lindau City Clerk
Sherwin - Williams Co 8909-5 104.90$ Paint - Well Houses Water Utility
Signature Lighting Inc 1528 404.17$ Streetlight Repairs Street Dept
TASC IN3661360 50.00$ March Cobra Administration Fee Finance Dept
TASC IN3661360 100.00$ Cobra Administration Annual Fee Finance Dept
T-Mobile 870254054 473.37$ Cellular Phone Charges Various
T-Mobile 870254054 21.97$ Tower No. 4/Well No. 6 Cradlepoint Water Utility
T-Mobile 870254054 21.97$ Rice Lake Centre Cradlepoint Administration
T-Mobile 870254054 40.25$ Hanifl Cradlepoint Parks Dept
Toshiba Financial Services 5037692175 148.74$ March Lease Payment Fire Dept
Toshiba Financial Services 5037692175 13.71$ Overage Charges (Color) Fire Dept
Toshiba Financial Services 5037692175 2.77$ Overage Charges (B & W) Fire Dept
Page 1
City of Hugo Claims
March 16, 2026 G. 1
Vendor Invoice Amount Description Department
TruGreen 219947280 623.28$ Salt (Snow & Ice Control) Street Dept
UniFirst Corporation 1410203264 138.43$ Uniforms, Supplies & Floor Mat Services (PW) Public Works
UniFirst Corporation 1410204757 142.83$ Uniforms, Supplies & Floor Mat Services (PW) Public Works
UniFirst Corporation 1410206394 138.43$ Uniforms, Supplies & Floor Mat Services (PW) Public Works
Verizon Wireless 6136798610 866.00$ Cellular Phone Charges Various
White Bear Locksmith 36156 14.00$ Keys - Water Rooms (Waters Edge Townhomes) Water Utility
Wright, Gregory February 1,400.00$ February Cleaning Services (PPP) Parks Dept
51,480.64$ Total Claims for March 16, 2026
Page 2
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES AGREEMENT
This Professional Services Agreement (“Agreement”) is entered into as of January 1, 2026
(“Effective Date”) by and between:
City of Hugo, a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota
(“City”),
and
Lakes Center, a nonprofit organization organized under the laws of the State of Minnesota,
with its principal place of business at 200 4th Street SW, Forest Lake, MN 55025
(“Provider”).
The City and Provider may be referred to individually as a “Party” and collectively as the
“Parties.”
1. Purpose
The purpose of this Agreement is for Provider to deliver counseling, enrichment, restorative
justice, youth outreach, education engagement, and intervention services to eligible
residents of the City in support of community well-being, prevention, and early intervention
needs. The City agrees to compensate Provider through a lump-sum payment to support
these services.
2. Scope of Services
Provider shall make the following services available to City residents during the Term of this
Agreement:
2.1 Counseling Services
• Individual, family, or group counseling
• Trauma -informed, strengths-based, and evidence-informed approaches
• Services provided by licensed or credentialed professionals, as applicable
2.2 Enrichment Services
• Youth enrichment programming
• Skill-building, social-emotional learning, and prevention-focused activities
• School-based or community-based programming, as available
2.3 Intervention Services
• Early intervention and support services
• Behavioral intervention, conflict resolution, and restorative practices
• Coordination with families, schools, and community partners as appropriate
2.4 Education Engagement Services
• Academic support and engagement services for school-age youth
• Attendance support, advocacy, and coordination with schools and families
• Skill-building focused on organization, motivation, and social-emotional learning
• Services delivered in school, community, or virtual settings, as available
2.5 Youth Outreach Services
• Community-based outreach to youth who experience barriers to accessing services
• Relationship-building, engagement, and connection to supportive resources
• Prevention-focused and early-intervention activities
• Services provided in community, school, or other appropriate settings
2.6 Restorative Justice Services
• Restorative practices, mediation, and conflict resolution services
• Support for youth, families, and community partners following behavioral or
disciplinary incidents
• Facilitation of restorative conversations and accountability processes
• Collaboration with schools, municipalities, and community stakeholders, as
appropriate
Provider retains discretion over service delivery methods, staffing models, and scheduling
to meet community needs. Services described in this Section are made available based on
community need and capacity and do not constitute a guarantee of specific service
volumes, sessions, or outcomes.
3. Eligible Participants
Services under this Agreement shall be available to residents of the City. Provider shall
maintain appropriate eligibility and referral procedures consistent with organizational
policies, funding requirements, and applicable law.
4. Term
This Agreement shall commence on January 1, 2026, and remain in effect through
December 31, 2026, unless earlier terminated in accordance with this Agreement.
5. Compensation
5.1 Lump-Sum Payment
The City agrees to pay Provider a lump sum of $17,670 for the Term of this Agreement.
5.2 Payment Schedule
Payment shall be due upon execution of this Agreement and receipt of an invoice. Payment
is not contingent upon service utilization levels and shall be used to support the availability
and delivery of services described herein.
6. Use of Funds
Funds may be used by Provider for, but are not limited to:
• Program staff salaries and benefits
• Clinical supervision and training
• Administrative and support functions
• Program supplies and materials
• Outreach, coordination, and reporting
• Technology, facilities, and operational costs
The City acknowledges that funds support both direct and indirect costs necessary to
deliver services.
7. Reporting
Provider shall provide the City with a summary report at least annually (or at the conclusion
of the Term), which may include:
• Number of individuals served (unduplicated, as feasible)
• General service categories provided
• Community impact highlights
Reports shall not include confidential or personally identifiable client information.
8. Confidentiality
Provider shall comply with all applicable federal and state confidentiality laws, including
but not limited to HIPAA and applicable data privacy statutes. Client-identifying
information shall not be shared with the City.
9. Independent Contractor
Provider is an independent contractor and not an employee or agent of the City. Provider is
solely responsible for wages, benefits, taxes, and supervision of its personnel.
10. Insurance
Provider shall maintain insurance coverage customary for nonprofit human services
organizations, including:
• General liability insurance
• Professional liability
• Workers’ compensation (as required by law)
Proof of insurance shall be provided upon request.
11. Indemnification
To the fullest extent permitted by law, Provider agrees to indemnify and hold harmless the
City, its officers, employees, and agents from claims arising from Provider’s negligent acts
or omissions in the performance of this Agreement.
12. Non-Discrimination
Provider shall not discriminate in the provision of services on the basis of race, color,
religion, sex, national origin, age, disability, sexual orientation, gender identity, or any other
protected class.
13. Termination
Either Party may terminate this Agreement with 30 days’ written notice. In the event of
termination, Provider shall retain payment for services rendered and costs incurred
through the effective date of termination. Any prepaid amounts shall be refunded on a
prorated basis, calculated according to the number of months the Agreement was in
effect.
14. Amendment
This Agreement may be amended only by written agreement signed by authorized
representatives of both Parties.
15. Governing Law
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the
State of Minnesota.
16. Entire Agreement
This Agreement constitutes the entire understanding between the Parties and supersedes
all prior agreements or representations related to the subject matter herein.
17. Authorized Signatures
CITY OF __________________________
By: _______________________________
Name: _____________________________
Title: _____________________________
Date: _____________________________
LAKES CENTER
By: _______________________________
Name: _____________________________
Title: _____________________________
Date: _____________________________
5/24
Page 1 of 2
MINNESOTA LAWFUL GAMBLING
LG240B Application to Conduct Excluded Bingo No Fee
ORGANIZATION INFORMATION
Organization Previous Gambling
Name: ________________________________________________________ Permit Number: ____________________________
Minnesota Tax ID Federal Employer ID
Number, if any: ______________________________________ Number (FEIN), if any: ________________________________
Mailing
Address: _______________________________________________________________________________________________
City: ____________________________________ State: _________ Zip: __________ County: ___________________________
Name of Chief Executive Officer (CEO): ________________________________________________________________________
NONPROFIT STATUS
Type of Nonprofit Organization (check one):
____ Fraternal ____ Religious ____ Veterans ____ Other Nonprofit Organization
Attach a copy of at least one of the following showing proof of nonprofit status:
(DO NOT attach a sales tax exempt status or federal employer ID number, as they are not proof of nonprofit status.)
____ Current calendar year Certificate of Good Standing
Don’t have a copy? This certificate must be obtained each year from:
MN Secretary of State, Business Services Division
60 Empire Drive, Suite 100
St. Paul, MN 55103
____ Internal Revenue Service-IRS income tax exemption 501(c) letter in your organization’s name
Don’t have a copy? Obtain a copy of your federal income tax exempt letter by having an organization officer contact
the IRS at 877-829-5500.
____ Internal Revenue Service-Affiliate of national, statewide, or international parent nonprofit organization (charter)
If your organization falls under a parent organization, attach copies of both of the following:
1.IRS letter showing your parent organization is a nonprofit 501(c) organization with a group ruling; and
2.the charter or letter from your parent organization recognizing your organization as a subordinate.
EXCLUDED BINGO ACTIVITY
Has your organization held a bingo event in the current calendar year? ____ Yes ____ No
If yes, list the dates when bingo was conducted: ______________________________________
The proposed bingo event will be:
____ one of four or fewer bingo events held this year. Dates: __________________________________________
-OR-
____ conducted on up to 12 consecutive days in connection with a:
___ county fair Dates: _______________________________________________________________
___ civic celebration Dates: _______________________________________________________________
___ Minnesota State Fair Dates: _______________________________________________________________
Person in charge of bingo event: _________________________________________ Daytime Phone: _______________________
Name of premises where bingo will be conducted: ________________________________________________________________
Premises street address: ____________________________________________________________________________________
City: __________________________ If township, township name: _______________________ County: ___________________
Secretary of State website, phone numbers:
www.sos.state.mn.us
651-296-2803, or toll free 1-877-551-6767
Email permit to (if other than the CEO): ______________________________________________________________________ Email permit to (if other than the CEO): _______________________________________________________________________
(permit will be emailed to this email address unless otherwise indicated below)
CEO Daytime Phone: ______________________ CEO Email: _______________________________________________________
LG240B Application to Conduct Excluded Bingo
LOCAL UNIT OF GOVERNMENT ACKNOWLEDGMENT (required before submitting application to
the Minnesota Gambling Control Board)
CITY APPROVAL
for a gambling premises
located within city limits
On behalf of the city, I approve this application for excluded
bingo activity at the premises located within the city’s
jurisdiction.
Print City Name: ______________________________________
Signature of City Personnel:
___________________________________________________
Title:____________________________ Date:______________
COUNTY APPROVAL
for a gambling premises
located in a township
On behalf of the county, I approve this application for excluded
bingo activity at the premises located within the county’s
jurisdiction.
Print County Name: ___________________________________
Signature of County Personnel:
___________________________________________________
Title:____________________________ Date:______________
TOWNSHIP (if required by the county)
On behalf of the township, I acknowledge that the organization
is applying for excluded bingo activity within the township limits.
(A township has no statutory authority to approve or deny an
application, per Minnesota Statutes, Section 349.213.)
Print Township Name: _________________________________
Signature of Township Officer:___________________________
Title: ___________________________ Date: ______________
CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER’S SIGNATURE (required)
The information provided in this application is complete and accurate to the best of my knowledge.
Chief Executive Officer's Signature: ____________________________________________________ Date: ___________________
(Signature must be CEO’s signature; designee may not sign)
Print Name: _______________________________________________________________________________________________
MAIL OR FAX APPLICATION & ATTACHMENTS
Mail or fax application and a copy of your proof of nonprofit
status to:
Minnesota Gambling Control Board
1711 West County Road B, Suite 300 South
Roseville, MN 55113
Fax: 651-639-4032
An excluded bingo permit will be mailed to your organization.
Your organization must keep its bingo records for 3-1/2 years.
Questions?
Call a Licensing Specialist at 651-539-1900.
The city or county must sign before
submitting application to the
Gambling Control Board.
5/24
Page 2 of 2
Data privacy notice: The information requested
on this form (and any attachments) will be used
by the Gambling Control Board (Board) to deter-
mine your organization’s qualifications to be in-
volved in lawful gambling activities in Minnesota.
Your organization has the right to refuse to sup-
ply the information; however, if your organiza-
tion refuses to supply this information, the Board
may not be able to determine your organiza-
tion’s qualifications and, as a consequence, may
refuse to issue a permit. If your organization
supplies the information requested, the Board
will be able to process the application. Your
organization’s name and address will be public
information when received by the Board. All
other information provided will be private data
about your organization until the Board issues
the permit. When the Board issues the permit,
all information provided will become public. If
the Board does not issue a permit, all infor-
mation provided remains private, with the ex-
ception of your organization’s name and address
which will remain public. Private data about
your organization are available to Board
members, Board staff whose work requires
access to the information; Minnesota’s Depart-
ment of Public Safety; Attorney General; Com-
missioners of Administration, Minnesota Manage-
ment & Budget, and Revenue; Legislative Audi-
tor, national and international gambling regula-
tory agencies; anyone pursuant to court order;
other individuals and agencies specifically
authorized by state or federal law to have access
to the information; individuals and agencies for
which law or legal order authorizes a new use or
sharing of information after this notice was
given; and anyone with your written consent.
Bingo hard cards and bingo number selection devices may
be borrowed from another organization authorized to
conduct bingo. Otherwise, bingo hard cards, bingo paper,
and bingo number selection devices must be obtained from a
distributor licensed by the Minnesota Gambling Control
Board. A list of licensed distributors is available on the
Gambling Control Board's website at www.mn.gov/gcb.
This form will be made available in alternative format
(i.e. large print, braille) upon request.
An equal opportunity employer
Glacial Hills Regional Trail Long Range Plan
What is a Regional Trail?
• Attracts regional
users
• Connects regional
destinations
• Multiuse and
accessible
• “Tree trunks” or
“highways” of trail
network
• Amenities and
wayfinding
• Provide guidance on future trail
route alignment—not
preliminary design
• Engagement and coordination
with local public agencies and
residents
• Vision for trail operations,
stewardship of corridor
resources
• Eligibility for regional/state
funding
What is a Long Range Plan?
Project Timeline
Stay Informed:
Project information and updates will be posted on the county’s website:
washingtoncountymn.gov/GlacialHills
Washington County Regional Trail Design Standard
Public Engagement
• Attended 10+ engagement
events
• Public engagement survey—
600+ responses!
Key findings from input received:
• Scenic, off-road experience
• Connections to natural areas
• Loop opportunities
• Opportunities for shade & rest
Glacial Hills Regional Trail Long Range Plan
Proposed Trail Alignment
The long range plan identifies a Long Term Alignment as the future route for the Glacial Hills Regional Trail. Many
variables and timelines could impact the development of the Long Term Alignment, including the future plans of the
railroad corridor that is currently owned and operated by Canadian National.
Because of this uncertainty, an Alternate Alignment was also identified. This alignment represents the recommended
route if the Long Term Alignment proves to be impractical or unfeasible.
With future phases of the project many years away, this approach allows Washington County to maintain flexibility.
The county will continue to engage with stakeholders and work through the details of a future project.
Project Contact:
Connor Schaefer, Senior Planner, Washington County Public Works
Connor.Schaefer@co.washington.mn.us, 651-430-4303
A future trail that uses the railroad grade (as proposed in the Long Term Alignment) will require additional design and
review. Opportunities may include: stormwater mitigation, water quality, and natural resource management
improvements. During future phases, the county will also work with neighboring private property owners to address
screening and buffering opportunities.
3/11/2026
1
Glacial Hills Regional Trail
Long Range Plan
Hugo City Council: 3/16/26
2
Agenda
1. Project Overview
2. Stakeholder Engagement
3. Route Evaluation
and Recommendation
4. Implementation Considerations
5. Next Steps
6. Questions
1
2
3/11/2026
2
3
Project Overview
4
Regional Trail Long Range Plans
Regional Trails
•“Tree trunks” or "highways" of system
•Standard: 10 ft wide paved trail, with
10 ft buffer
•Quality signage and amenities
Long Range Plans
•Guidance on future alignment,
development, management
•Eligible for funding
•Engagement with partners and public
3
4
3/11/2026
3
5
Glacial Hills Corridor Background
•West-East arterial trail in northern
Washington County
•Priority in County’s Bike / Pedestrian Plan
•Destinations:
•Hardwood Creek Regional Trail
•Central Greenway Regional Trail
•Big Marine Park Reserve
•William O’Brien State Park
6
Long Range Plan Timeline
Spring - Summer
2023
• Visioning &
Site Analysis
Fall - Winter
2024
• Engagement
& Data
Collection
Winter - Summer
2024
•Route
Development &
Plan Drafting
Fall 2024 - Today
•Final Draft &
Approval
Process
5
6
3/11/2026
4
7
Project Goals
Create a safe and comfortable
recreational experience that is
accessible to all abilities.
Connect users to destinations while
expanding regional connectivity.
Feature and steward natural
resources while promoting
environmental resiliency.
Promote equity and inclusion.
Develop a trail alignment that is
implementable, responsible, and
supported by the community.
8
Stakeholder Engagement
7
8
3/11/2026
5
9
Public Engagement
•Hugo Good Neighbor Days
•Washington County Fair
•Big Marine Park Reserve Pop-Up
•Art in the Park / Farmer’s Market (Forest Lake)
•Marine Mills Folk School Fall Festival
•Senior Expo at Forest Lake YMCA
•Community Conversation at Forest Lake YMCA
•On-line Survey
•Open Houses
•November 2023 at Hugo City Hall
•June 2024
•July 2024 at Hugo City Hall
10
Public Input:
Key Messages
Community members prefer:
•Scenic, off-road
experience
•Connections to natural
areas
•Loop opportunities
•Opportunities for shade
and rest
9
10
3/11/2026
6
11
Route Evaluation
and Recommendation
12
Initial Route Opportunities
Phase 1: Segment Assessment
•“Spaghetti at the wall”
•Low hanging fruit
Phase 2: Evaluation Analysis
•Data-driven, each segment scored based on
Project Goals
•Evaluation Scores = used as a guide
•Not prescriptive
•“Boots on the ground”
11
12
3/11/2026
7
13
Draft Route Recommendation
14
Route Segments in Hugo
Long Term Alignment
County Road 8/Frenchman Road (no changes)
13
14
3/11/2026
8
15
Route Segments in Hugo
Long Term Alignment
Highway 61/Forest
Boulevard North
(no changes)
16
Route Segments in Hugo
Long Term Alignment
County Road 4/170th Street North
15
16
3/11/2026
9
17
Route Segments in Hugo
Long Term Alignment
Wetlands along County Road 4/170th Street North
18
Route Segments East of Hugo
Long Term Alignment
Big Marine Park Reserve
Alternate Alignment
County Road 4
17
18
3/11/2026
10
19
Trail Features
Trail Amenities
•Improve user experience
•Provide access, information
Considerations within City:
•Trailheads
•Wayfinding/interpretive
signage opportunities
20
Implementation Considerations
19
20
3/11/2026
11
21
Implementation Timeline
Community
Vision
Long Range
Plan
•Develop high-
level concept
•Identify areas
for additional
study
Feasibility
Study /
Preliminary
Design
• Reengage
stakeholders
• Work through
challenges,
refine designs
and costs
Final Design
•Finalize
design
•Formalize
funding and
agreements
Construction
• Construction
coordination,
likely in phases Open to
Public
Stakeholder Engagement
22
Washington County Policy
Cost Share
•Initial implementation: 50% County Contribution
•Replacement/repaving: 100% County
Operations and Maintenance
•County (on County-owned land):
•Waste/recycle pickup
•Trailheads, kiosks, graffiti
•Seasonal mowing
•Local agency
•Winter plowing (optional)
•Minor maintenance
21
22
3/11/2026
12
23
Strategies/Opportunities •Cost/implementation: measure and account
for in evaluation
•Work collaboratively to reduce costs
•Grant opportunities – expanding options!
•Land donations
•Development agreements
•Planning is key
•Future railroad corridor opportunities
•Where is development planned?
•Coincide with planned capital project
24
Potential Funding Sources
General InformationSponsor AgencyGrant Program
America Walks awards stipends to communities for projects related to creating healthy, active, and
engaged places to live, work and play.Other - MinnesotaAmerica Walks
Supports partners to complete trail research, design, planning, stewardship, and maintenance projects
that are inclusive, foster improved trail user behavior and connect trail assets to a broader spectrum of
users.
American Trails OrganizationAmerican Trails, Trails Capacity Program
The BRIC program aims to categorically shift the federal focus away from reactive disaster spending
and toward research-supported proactive investment in community resilience.Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)Building Resilient Infrastructure & Communities
Helps cities and counties reduce the costs of borrowing to build certain public facilities.Minnesota Public Facilities Authority (PFA)Credit Enhancement Program
Grants are awarded to help communities across the nation plan, build, innovate, and put people back
to work through construction or non-construction projects designed to meet local needs.US Economic Development Administration (EDA)Economic Ajustement Assistance Program
ENRTF aims to protect, conserve, preserve, and enhance Minnesota’s air, water, land, fish, wildlife,
and other natural resources.Environment and Natural Resources Trust FundEnvironment and Natural Resources Trust
Encourage the maintenance and development of motorized, non-motorized, and diversified trails.Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesFederal Recreational Trail Program (MN)
This is a new program in 2022 funded by the State of Minnesota and administered through MnDOT.
The program provides funding for infrastructure that facilitates more safe and effective transportation
for cyclists and pedestrians.
MN Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)Active Transportation State Infrastructure
Program
The goal of Minnesota GreenCorps is to preserve and protect Minnesota’s environment while training
a new generation of environmental professionals.Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA)GreenCorps Host Site
To create or reinvigorate parks and other outdoor recreation spaces in areas with populations of
30,000 or more people.Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesNational Outdoor Recreation Legacy Partnership
(ORLP) Program
To provide grants to local units of government to promote short trail connections between where
people live and desirable locations, not to develop significant new trails.Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesLocal Trail Connections Program
A competitive process to award federal transportation funding to projects that meet regional
transportation needs within the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area.Metropolitan CouncilRegional Solicitation
Facilitates development and maintenance of trails for use by All-Terrain Vehicles, Off-Highway
Motorcycles, and Off-Road Vehicles.Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesMinnesota Off Highway Vehicle Trails Assistance
Program
To increase, protect and enhance natural and scenic areas.Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesNatural and Scenic Area Grants
Support and increase efforts to expand programming that connects youth to the outdoors.Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesNo Child Left Inside
Assist local governments in improving access to public recreation facilities.Minnesota Department of Natural ResourcesState Park Road Account Program
23
24
3/11/2026
13
25
Next Steps
26
Next Steps
County Request: Municipal Support
Final Approval Process
•Winter – partner agencies
•Spring – County Board & Met Council
25
26
3/11/2026
14
Connor Schaefer
Senior Planner
651-430-4303
connor.schaefer@washingtoncountymn.gov
Questions?
Andrea Rehm
Planner II
651-430-4332
andrea.rehm@washingtoncountymn.gov
27
14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North, Hugo, MN 55038 • (651) 762-6300 • www.ci.hugo.mn.us
DATE
Metropolitan Council Chair and Parks and Open Space Commission
390 North Robert Street
Saint Paul, MN 55101
Hello Chair and Commission Members,
I am writing to express the City of Hugo’s support for the Glacial Hills Regional Trail long range plan. The Glacial Hills
Regional Trail will be an east-west trail that will run through northern Washington County. Once fully developed, it will
connect pedestrians, bicyclists and trail users to regional destinations, including Hardwood Creek and Central Greenway
Regional Trails, Big Marine Park Reserve and William O’Brien State Park. Guided by interagency collaboration and its
public engagement process, this long range plan provides the vision and direction for the future development of this
trail.
The City of Hugo has been involved in the planning process and supports the improvements proposed in Glacial Hills
Regional Trail long range plan. This plan provides long-term planning and implementation guidance for route
alignment, trail uses and facilities, and corridor natural resource management. Area trail users will benefit from
additional transportation and recreational opportunities, and equally, the project area will benefit from the careful
stewardship of water resources.
Thank you for the opportunity to send our support. We look forward to working with all agency partners on the
implementation of the Glacial Hills Regional Trail long range plan.
Please contact me at 651-762-6300 if you have any questions.
Sincerely,
Bryan Bear
Administrator, City of Hugo
CC: Hugo City Council
Hugo Parks Commission
RESOLUTION 2026-X
RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE WASHINGTON COUNTY GLACIAL HILLS
REGIONAL TRAIL LONG RANGE PLAN
WHEREAS, the City of Hugo recognizes the Glacial Hills Regional Trail as an important
component of the regional park and trail system, providing recreational and non-motorized
transportation opportunities to the residents of the City and region; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Glacial Hills Regional Trail long range plan provides planning and
implementation guidance for the improvements, acquisitions, and management needed to
develop a regional trail that meets the needs of the public; and
WHEREAS, the planning process for the Glacial Hills Regional Trail long range plan included
public engagement events and meetings that provided the opportunity for input from partner
agencies and public stakeholders; and
WHEREAS, the City of Hugo supports the acquisition, design, implementation, and operation of
the Glacial Hills Regional Trail pursuant to the long range plan; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF HUGO, that the City
of Hugo supports the proposed Glacial Hills Regional Trail long range plan.
This resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Hugo on the 16th day of March
2026, by a vote of four Ayes and no Nays.
________________________
Tom Weidt, Mayor
ATTEST:
___________________________________
Michele Lindau, City Clerk
STAGE SPONSORS:
KIDZ N BIZAPRIL 18, 2026
Oneka Elementary | 9 AM - Noon
ACTIVTY SPONSORS:
A H A R D D A Y S N I G H T
R .O .C .K .
M T P O C K E T S & L O O S E
C H A N G E
F O L K R E V I V A L
7:00 pm - 9:00 pm
Hi gh e nerg y , au t he ntic r epli cation of a Beatl es
pe r fo r man ce co ns i d e red to be one of th e to p
Be a t les t r ib ute s hows i n th e nation .
6:30 pm - 7:30 pm
“T he R oyal Orde r of C hords an d Keys ” with
k i ndie roc k er A r i c Bie gane k . F a mil y -Friend ly!
F un , dance-w orth y b len d of clas sic so ul , R &B,
Moto wn , s win g, a nd p op hi t s wit h mul t i p le l e a d
vo cal i sts a nd a five-piece h orn sec tio n.
6:0 0 p m - 7:0 0 p m
An a cou stic t rio co v erin g c lass ic f ol k, co un try
a nd po p art i sts f r om the f iftie s thr ou gh t he
seve nties .
2 7
5
8
2
M A Y
A U GU S T
J U L Y
S E P T E M B E R
CONCERTSLIONS VOLUNTEER PARK
MORE
INFORMATION
MORE
INFORMATION 651-762-6342
WWW.CI.HUGO.MN.US
6:00 p m - 7:30 p m
WEDNESDAY NIGHTS - FREE!
LIMITED SEATING AVAILABLE. LAWN CHAIRS WELCOME!
1 3/12/2026 3:09 PM
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
12345678 9 10 11 12 13 1415 16 17 18 19 20 2122 23 24 25 26 27 2829 30 31
March 2026
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
123456789101112 13 14 15 16 17 1819 20 21 22 23 24 2526 27 28 29 30
April 2026March 2026
Mar 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
7:00pm City Council
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
6:30pm BOZA
7:00pm Planning Comm
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
7:00pm City Council St. Pat's Day
1:00pm Hist Comm
5:30pm EDA
7:00pm Parks Comm
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
5:30pm 165th St. AUAR
(Oneka Room)
6:30pm BOZA
7:00pm Planning Comm
29 30 31 Apr 1 2 3 4
SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY
2 3/12/2026 3:09 PM
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
123456789101112 13 14 15 16 17 1819 20 21 22 23 24 2526 27 28 29 30
April 2026
Su Mo Tu We Th Fr Sa
12345678910 11 12 13 14 15 1617 18 19 20 21 22 2324 25 26 27 28 29 3031
May 2026April 2026
Mar 29 30 31 Apr 1 2 3 4
5:30pm LBAE Meeting
(Oneka Room)
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
Easter 7:00pm City Council 4:00pm Hardwood
Creek Open House
(Oneka Room)
6:30pm BOZA
7:00pm Planning Comm
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
7:00pm Parks Comm 9:00am Kidz 'n Biz
(Oneka Elementary)
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
7:00pm City Council 1:00pm Hist Comm
5:30pm EDA
5:30pm Workshop on
Zoning Code
6:30pm BOZA
7:00pm Planning Comm
8:00am Spring Cleanup
(Public Works)
26 27 28 29 30 May 1 2
8:00am Shredding Event
(City Hall Parking Lot)
SUNDAY MONDAY TUESDAY WEDNESDAY THURSDAY FRIDAY SATURDAY