The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutPC Packet 06.25.26If you need accommodations for the Planning Commission meeting please contact Rachel Juba at (651) 762-6304 or rjuba@ci.hugo.mn.us, thank you. Agenda Hugo Planning Commission Thursday, June 25, 2026 Hugo City Hall 7:00 PM A. ROLL CALL: Andress, Derr, Fahey, Granger, Klein, Kleissler, Petty B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 1. January 22, 2026 D. PUBLIC HEARING 1. DRW Property Investments, LLC. – Preliminary Plat and PUD requests for 50 townhome units to be known as “Oneka Lake Reserve,” generally located north of 150th Street North and west of Goodview Avenue North. 2. Ordinance Amendment -- An amendment to repeal and replace Chapter 90 – Zoning and Land Use in its entirety and amend the Zoning Map. E. NEW BUSINESS F. OLD BUSINESS 1. Update on 165th Street AUAR G. ADJOURNMENT Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of Thursday, January 22, 2026 Chair Kleissler called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. PRESENT: Andress, Derr, Granger, Klein, Kleissler, Petty ABSENT: Fahey STAFF: Rachel Juba, Community Development Director Max Gort, Associate Planner Pledge of Allegiance. Approval of Minutes for the Planning Commission Meeting of December 11, 2025 Commissioner Petty made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Klein, to approve the minutes for the Planning Commission meeting of December 11, 2025. All ayes. Motion carried. New Business – Frenchman Village Sketch Plan Community Development Director Juba presented background on the request from Maplewood Development for informal, nonbinding comments on a sketch plan with residential and commercial uses. The sketch plan is for nine separate parcels totaling approximately 97 acres in size. The property is generally located south of Frenchman Road/CSAH 8 and west of Forest Blvd/Highway 61. There are no wetlands on the site, but natural constraints include judicial and private ditches, as well as floodplain. Juba showed the 2040 Land Use Plan guiding the eastern portion of the property as Mixed Use (MIX), and the western portion of the property being guided for Commercial (COM) in the northern half and Low Density Residential (LD) in the southern half. The zoning generally follows the land use plan, with the area guided MIX being zoned as Central Business (C-1). The mixed use property is part of the identified downtown area and subject to the Downtown Plan and Design Guidelines. Juba showed the applicant’s sketch plan with a mixture of single-family homes, attached townhomes, and commercial areas. While the entire frontage of Frenchman Road is currently guided for commercial development, the sketch plan reduces the commercial areas to near the intersections with Oneka Parkway and Highway 61. Filling in this reduced commercial area, the applicant is proposing to move residential uses further north within the site and utilize areas to the south within the site for ponding and floodplain mitigation. The residential areas that are near Frenchman Road will have a landscaped berm with a decorative fence to create a buffer from the major road. The sketch plan shows the extensions of Victor Path and Fenway Avenue that are required in the 2040 Transportation Plan. There is some existing regional infrastructure within the property, including a Metropolitan Council sewer interceptor and associated lift station at the southeast corner of the intersection of January 22, 2026 PC Minutes Page 2 Oneka Parkway and Frenchman Road. The applicant is proposing to relocate the sewer interceptor to align with the development, which will require approval from the Met Council. The sketch plan currently shows a clubhouse near the lift station. Staff is recommending the applicant consider a further buffer or a commercial use near the lift station. The applicant’s proposed land use changes include a reduction of commercially guided property and increase of residential property along Frenchman Road. The applicant is making the request based on market conditions, stating that the land was guided for commercial development for a long time and hasn’t seen that development. The applicant is making an effort to blend the medium density residential and commercial uses within the parcel guided for mixed use. The applicant has not provided formal details on the users that may come to the commercial sites. The sketch plan shows a four-acre public park on the southern edge of the property, and has numerous trail connections within the development. Park dedication is required of all residential land development. Staff’s opinion is that the proposed park is in a good location. The Parks Commission reviewed the sketch plan at their January 21, 2026 meeting, and were generally comfortable with the proposal, but wanted to request a larger area of land to accommodate further recreational needs in the area. The EDA reviewed the sketch plan at their January 20, 2026 meeting, and generally liked the mix of uses and that the developer is planning for the entire 97 acre property. The EDA wanted to see more commercial property, but was generally comfortable with the amount proposed. Juba said that the project is still being evaluated at a very high level and there are several key details to figure out before a formal development application . Staff’s opinion is that the applicant generally made an effort to meet the requirements of City Code, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Downtown Plan and Design Guidelines. Staff recommended that the Planning C ommission provide comments on the sketch plan, including the requested land use and zoning revisions, the general layout, and the downtown area. Commissioner Klein asked if ditches interior to the property could drain to ponds or if ditches could be widened by creating ponds. Juba said that it’s difficult to say without an engineering analysis. Klein said he thought about it from a drought standpoint and maintaining pond levels. Commissioner Klein asked if the development proposal would affect the issue s the City has been having with the Met Council and the System Statement. Juba said the plan was shared with the Met Council, and that the plan would meet 2050 density requirements. Commissioner Granger asked about the general history of the property and other concepts the city has reviewed. Juba said that the property has been marketed for about 20 years, and that the city has seen a number of proposals, most of which didn’t plan for the entire site. Mario Cocchiarella, owner of Maplewood Development, introduced himself as the applicant. Cocchiarella said he is also the owner Belair Sitework Services. Cocchiarella said that the two biggest January 22, 2026 PC Minutes Page 3 complications with the site are working around the floodplain and trying to relocate the sewer interceptor. Cocchiarella said that the amount of commercial area proposed was appropriate for the size of the development, and that trail connections have been a very popular amenity in other projects they’ve done. Cocchiarella said that the entire project would be constructed in one phase. Commissioner Petty asked if any of the proposed single family homes would be patio homes with an HOA. Cocchiarella said that they will be standards single-family homes that may have an association. Petty asked if Lennar would be building the homes, Cocchiarella said Lennar would be the most likely builder. Commissioner Andress asked about soil corrections that may be needed in the Low Density Residential area. Cocchiarella explained that they’d be removing the top few layers of soil, removing unwanted soils like peat, and filling the land back up with compaction. Details would be included in a future grading plan. Andress said he’s concerned about the homes proposed to back up to Frenchman Road, saying that his own house backs up to Highway 61 and he hears highway noise even with some vegetative buffer. Cocchiarella described the proposed 50-foot wide berm, screening, and fence that are all intended to reduce noise, and that they’ve found residents may prefer a home near the development entrance even if it means increased noise. Petty asked about the fencing materials, Cocchiarella said that it’d be something like a picket fence and maintained by an association. Chair Kleissler asked why the clubhouse and park are located on opposite sides of the development, thinking that it would be better to locate them near each other. Juba said they’re separated because the clubhouse would be a private amenity for the association. Commissioner Klein asked the developer how he felt about locating a commercial use near the lift station rather than the clubhouse. Cocchiarella said they’d do it if the city requires it, but that he’d rather keep a residential user on that side of Oneka Parkway, and that they haven’t had odor complaints from residents in other projects near lift stations. Commissioner Klein said he’s impressed to see a project that plans for the whole site, and that he understands market conditions driving the mix of uses being proposed. Commissioner Derr said that he wasn’t sure about utilizing county road frontage for residential uses, when commercial fits much better. Petty brings up previous discussion about a lot of land within the city being guided for commercial development that hasn’t been built. Petty said she’s skeptical about how long it may take to fill the commercial spaces proposed. Cocchiarella said that he sees medical offices being the primary and first tenants, with supplementary tenants being supported by medical anchors. Commissioner Andress talked about the potential for cut-through traffic between Frenchman Road and the Bald Eagle Industrial Park via the extended Fenway Boulevard, and increasing traffic on the residential portion of Fenway. Andress asked if the developer would consider a resta urant user for the commercial spaces, Cocchiarella said yes. January 22, 2026 PC Minutes Page 4 Chair Kleissler said she felt comfortable with the proposed land use changes and mix of uses, and asked if the other Planning Commissioners agreed. Several said yes. Kleissler said she generally likes the downtown area layout proposed. Commissioner Andress asked about the land use change process. Juba said the developer would apply for a preliminary plat for the whole site, and go through a comprehensive plan amendment approval with the Met Council, with all zoning being under the PUD. Chair Kleissler said she liked the sketch plan. Old Business – Approve 2026 Goals Juba shared the draft of the 2026 Planning Commission goals, and explained some minor language changes. The evaluation of the commercial and industrial design guidelines was kept, which staff would like to begin work for this year. Juba said the EDA discussed an updated commercial market study, which the Planning Commission could keep in mind. The 165th Street AUAR is going to the City Council for ordering soon, and the Planning Commission will continue to receive updates on its progression. Juba asked if there were any additions from the Planning Commission. Commissioner Petty made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Klein, to approve the 2026 Planning Commission Goals as presented. All ayes. Motion carried. Adjournment Commissioner Klein made a motion, seconded by Commissioner Derr, to adjourn at 7:56 PM. All ayes. Motion carried. Respectfully Submitted, Max Gort, Associate Planner RESOLUTION 2026-__ APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FOR ONEKA LAKE RESERVE LLC, FOR “ONEKA LAKE RESERVE” ON PROPERTY LOCATED NORTH OF 150TH STREET NORTH AND ACROSS FROM GENERATION AVENUE NORTH WHEREAS, Oneka Lake Reserve, LLC has requested approval of a preliminary plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) to allow 50 townhomes and two outlots on the property legally described as follows: Lot 1, Block 1, Oneka Lake Townhomes 2nd Addition WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has reviewed the preliminary plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD) at a duly called Public Hearing and recommends approval, and; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT HEREBY RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA, that it should and hereby does approve the request by Oneka Lake Reserve, LLC., for a preliminary plat and planned unit development (PUD), subject to the following conditions: 1. A preliminary plat and planned unit development general plan are approved to allow the creation of 50 townhome units and two outlots including a public park, in accordance with the plans and application received by the City on April 20, 2026, and revised plans dated May 8, 2026, May 13, 2026, May 26, 2026, May 28, 2026, June 3, 2026, and June 11, 2026, except as amended by this resolution. 2. The PUD general plan is approved based on the finding that the proposed project is consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan. 3. The preliminary plat approval is contingent upon approval of the requested Planned Unit Development. 4. The preliminary plat shall include two outlots. Outlot A shall include the common space between each townhome lot and in the center of the development, as well as the private street. Outlot B shall consist of the public park. 5. The developer shall comply with all conditions in the City Engineer’s Memo dated June 17, 2026. Resolution 2026- Page 2 6. PUD Flexibility is granted to allow the following: PUD Minimum front setback from 150th Street 25 feet Minimum front yard setback from private drive 15 feet Minimum side yard setback 15 feet Minimum side yard setback between buildings 20 feet Minimum rear setback 25 feet 7. Guest parking shall comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act as may be applicable. 8. No parking shall be allowed on the private drives. 9. The private drives must comply with City standards for private drives. 10. No signage is proposed at this time. Should signage be desired, the applicant must apply for a sign permit with details ensuring compliance with ordinance requirements. 11. The developer shall remain in contact with the property owners to the north and east of the development during the construction of the expanded shared stormwater pond. 12. Prior to approval of the final plat, the applicant must comply with the following conditions: a. The developer must obtain all necessary Federal, State, and local Permits. b. The developer must obtain all necessary stormwater management and WCA permits from the City. c. The plans shall be revised to show the lot lines in the preliminary plat submitted on June 11, 2026. d. The grading for the expansion of the pond to the north and east shall be further evaluated to reduce the impact on the adjacent properties, including preserving trees in that area. e. The buildings shall comply with the following: i. The side and rear walls of the buildings shall be designed with the same elements to reduce building massing as are shown on the front of the building, including the utilization of all building materials that area used on the front façade. Resolution 2026- Page 3 ii. Building material samples and a color palette must be submitted for city review and approval. iii. Garage doors must be painted to match the color of the unit. iv. Garage doors must be prefinished to minimize maintenance. v. Updated architectural elevations based on the requirements listed above shall be submitted for review and approval by staff. f. Any revisions to the landscape plan shall be submitted for review and approval by staff. g. The irrigation plan shall be revised to include irrigation for the park. The revised irrigation plan shall be submitted for review and approval by staff. h. All mechanical equipment shall be screened with materials compatible with the building and project landscaping. The plans must submitted for review and approval by City staff. i. A lighting plan must be updated to match the site plan and submitted for review and approval by City staff. The plan shall include cut-sheets of the street lights proposed. j. The stormwater use plans shall be submitted for review and approval by City staff. A stormwater reuse agreement shall be completed with the Final Plat. k. A cross walk from the sidewalk on the west side Generation Avenue, north to the public park shall be added. Installation shall be completed by the developer. l. Private parking easements shall be dedicated over the areas of guest parking that extend over the property lines of Lot 4, Block 4 and Lot 1, Block 3. m. Trail easements shall be dedicated over the areas of bituminous trail that extend over the property lines of Lots 7, 8, 13, and 14, Block 6. n. A complete set of revised plans addressing the conditions of approval shall be submitted for city review and approval. 13. Prior to release of the final plat and resolution for filing at Washington County, the applicant must comply with the following conditions: a. The developer is proposing to create an organized homeowner’s association with the development with written covenants describing each member’s responsibilities, singly and jointly. The homeowner’s association documents shall be submitted for review and approval by City staff. b. The homeowner’s association documents shall include language to ensure that the enclosed garage spaces are maintained for vehicle parking and that parking of snowmobiles, boats, RVs and other recreational vehicles in the driveway is Resolution 2026- Page 4 discouraged. The covenants should be drafted to prohibit the storage of anything in the garage or driveway that would prevent the storage and parking of vehicles. c. The developer/HOA shall be responsible for the maintenance of: i. The sidewalks, pathways, and private streets, ii. private utilities, iii. stormwater reuse irrigation system, iv. common spaces and landscaping, v. internal drainage areas in common space, vi. development signage, vii. and any proposed fencing or retaining walls. This shall be included in the homeowners association documents. d. Cross access agreements shall be provided for the private streets and driveways. These easements shall be provided for City review and approval and filed with the final plat. e. A development agreement will need to be signed and executed in a form satisfactory to the City. f. The City’s development fees will apply to this project. The fee amounts will be calculated and included as part of the Development Agreement. 14. Prior to issuance of building permits, the applicant must comply with the following conditions: a. All development fees shall be paid. b. Final plat and development agreement shall be recorded at Washington County. c. The development shall meet all of the conditions in the development agreement regarding issuance of building permits. ADOPTED by the City Council this 6th day of July, 2026. ______________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor ATTEST: ___________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk 17 8 E 9 T H S T R E E T | SU I T E 2 0 0 | SA I N T P A U L , M N | 55 1 0 1 | 65 1 . 2 8 6 . 8 4 5 0 | WS B E N G . C O M June 17, 2026 Mr. Max Gort Associate Planner City of Hugo 14669 Fitzgerald Avenue North Hugo, MN 55038 Re: Preliminary Plat, Site Plan and Rezoning Oneka Lake Reserve WSB Project No. 035687-000 Dear Mr. Gort: We have reviewed the preliminary plat submittal for the proposed Oneka Lake Reserve development located north of 150th Street at Generation Avenue. In particular, we have reviewed the following plans related to this particular request: • Civil Plan Set dated April 20, 2026, by Elan Design Lab • Stormwater Management System Calculations and Narrative dated April 20, 2026, by Elan Design Lab • Preliminary Plat dated April 20, 2026 Based on the review of the above documents, we offer the following comments related to this application: Grading, Street, and Utility Plans 1. The site is proposed to have a single access extending north from the existing tee intersection of 150th Street North and Generation Avenue North. Two proposed buildings, one with three units and one with two units abuts and accesses 150th Street North with 5 individual residential driveways. The proposed access locations are acceptable. 2. Water service is available to the development from an existing 8” water service stub extending north from the intersection of 150th Street North and Generation Avenue North. The applicant will be required to create an 8” loop within the development for residential service and fire protection. A watermain stub will be required to be provided to the property to the west to allow for future connection and system looping to provide overall system reliability. 3. Streets and storm sewers are proposed to be private, however sanitary sewer and watermain will be public and contained within drainage and utility easements. This should be clearly shown on all utility plan sheets. 4. Sanitary sewer service is available to the site from an existing 8” sanitary service stub extending north from the intersection of 150th Street North and Generation Avenue North. 5. Grading is proposed in the drainage and utility easement area on the properties directly to the north to expand the size of this stormwater pond. Staff will need to continue to work with the applicant on the detailed grading of this pond to minimize impacts. Grading will also connect to the stormwater basin in the NE corner, making one large stormwater basin. 6. Drainage and Utility easements are appropriately shown over all of Outlot A. Mr. Max Gort June 17, 2026 Page 2 7. Detailed redline comments have been provided on the plans and sent to the applicants engineer so they can be addressed in future submittals. Stormwater Management 8. The stormwater water quality requirements are proposed to be met through expansion of the permanent wet pond located along the north property line. This work involves working within the drainage and utility easement along the north property line of this development (borders 3 lots in Sweet Grass Meadows 3rd addition and in the common space of Oneka Lake View North). The applicant has discussed this work with the adjacent property owners. 9. Water reuse has been evaluated for the pond and is a viable candidate for this development. Staff have provided comments on the proposed reuse system and will continue to work with the applicant to refine the plans and provide necessary details. 10. Additional stormwater plan and model comments have been provided to applicant, and they will need to be addressed in future submittals for documentation and permitting purposes. 11. The large wet pond located along the northern portion of the development will be in a drainage and utility easement where the city will be responsible for maintenance. The smaller sub catchments internal to the site that are not needed for stormwater management, but rather a means to move stormwater across the site will require maintenance to be provided by the development. A stormwater Maintenance Agreement will be required for this portion of the site. Thank you for the opportunity to provide comments on this project. Additional comments may be necessary following the review of the responses to these. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 612-360-1278. Sincerely, WSB Mark Erichson, PE City Engineer cc: Scott Anderson, Public Works Director (email only) Liz Finnegan, Senior Engineering Technician (email only) Rachel Juba, Community Development Director (email only) April 20th , 2026 City of Hugo Mayor, City council, Parks Commission and Planning Commission C/O Rachel Juba Community Development Director 14669 Fitzgerald Ave. N. Hugo, MN. 55038 Oneka Lake Reserve Subdivision Greetings, On behalf of Oneka Lake, LLC, we are pleased to present the proposed Oneka Lake Reserve Planned Unit Development consisting of 50 attached town homes. Project Narrative The subject property is located north of 150th Street North at the extension of Generation Avenue. The surrounding area includes the Generation Acres townhome development to the south, Oneka Lake View town homes to the southeast, additional townhome developments to the east, Sweet Grass Meadows single- family homes to the north, and the Hugo Estates manufactured home park to the west. An industrial park is located to the northwest, and New Life Church lies to the southwest. This proposal builds directly upon the previously approved 40-unit preliminary plat and Planned Unit Development (PUD), which was supported by city staff and approved by the Planning Commission on May 13, 2021. That plan established the overall framework for development of the site and demonstrated consistency with the Comprehensive Plan and surrounding land uses. The current proposal represents an evolution of the previously approved concept rather than a redesign, maintaining the same general layout, setbacks, and circular road system while improving site efficiency, open space usability, and stormwater management. Development Program The development consists of 50 town homes arranged in a mix of 2-unit, 3-unit, and 4-unit buildings. This variatiea reduees repetitive massing and ereates a mere visually eehesive aad diverse neigi'ltieri'leed environment. The units are anticipated to be two-story homes with attached 2-car garages and functional layouts designed to meet current market demand. The mix of unit types supports a broader range of homeowners and contributes to housing diversity within the City. Zoning and Density Justification The property is zoned R-4 (Low Density Multi-Family Residential), which permits townhome development at densities between 3 and 6 units per acre, with the ability to increase density to 8 units per acre through the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process. The proposed development achieves a density of approximately 7.5 units per acre, which is consistent with nearby townhome developments and remains within the allowable density range under PUD zoning. The increase from 40 to 50 units is achieved through itnproved site efficiency and layout refinement, not through reductions in setbacks or open space. Key itnprovements include: Elimination of internal stormwater ponding, more efficient building placement, smaller building footprint, itnproved internal circulation and increased usable open space. The revised plan results in approxitnately 2.8% more pervious surface area than the previously approved 40-unit plan, along with increased usable open space due to the removal of central ponding and maintains the core design elements supported in the previously approved 40-unit development while addressing layout efficiencies and overall site functionality. Quantitative Zonin-g a-nd-PUD Comparison- The proposed Planned Unit Development has been evaluated against the underlying R-4 zoning standards as well as typical development metrics. The following comparison demonstrates that while the proposed plan utilizes PUD flexibility in litnited areas, it exceeds standard zoning requirements in several key performance categories: Dimensional Standards Comparison Standard R-4 Requirement Proposed PUD Minitnum Site Size 1 acre 6.7 acres Site Width at Setback 150 ft 440 ft Site Depth 150 ft 663 ft Front Yard Setback 25 ft 25 ft Side Yard Setback 15 ft 25 ft Rear Yard Setback 25 ft 25 ft Building Separation 30 ft 20 ft Maxitnum Building Coverage 40% 21.3% (net of park) Maxitnum Impervious Surface 70% 52.2% (net of park) Maxim um Building Height 35 feet 29 feet Minitnum Unit Size 960 sq ft 1,150 sq ft Performance-Based Observations The comparison illustrates that the proposed development: Significantly reduces building coverage compared to allowed maxitnums, Maintains substantially lower itnpervious surface coverage-improving stormwater performance, Exceeds minimum unit size requirements-supporting higher quality housing, Provides increased side yard setbacks-maintaining separation from adjacent properties. Pg. 2 The proposed building height of approxhuately 29 feet is significantly below the maxhuum pennitted height of35 feet under R-4 zoning. The lower profile of the buildings contributes to a more residential scale and supports a more gradual transition between differing housing types. The only variation requested relates to building separation (20 feet vs. 30 feet), which is consistent with typical single-family spacing within the City and is offset by the substantial reductions in overall site coverage and increased open space. Internal Design Standards Within the development, the following standards are proposed: • Street width: 24 feet (face-to-face) • Sidewalks: 5 feet, Walking trails: 6 feet Boulevard • Boulevard widths: 6ft. walk to curb, 22.5 ft. Property line to curb (with walk), 11.5 ( no walk) • Building setbacks: o 19 feet to curb o 12.5 feet to sidewalk • Set back between buildings 20 ft., Garage setbacks to curb line: 22 feet minhuum, Parking Summary Type Stalls Stalls per Unit Garage 100 2.0 Private Guest 100 2.0 Shared Guest 25 0.5 Total 225 4.5 Summary of Findings The proposed PUD demonstrates that: The site is less intensely developed than allowed under standard zoning, The design results in improved stonnwater perfonnance, The development provides higher-quality housing and greater open space, The requested flexibility is lhuited and justified by measurable huprovements-Included designated park area, walking trails and sidewalks, Install of trees and landscaping exceeding city requirements. The proposed 50-unit plan results in measurable huprovements in site design metrics, including increased pervious surface area, expanded usable open space, and huproved stonnwater management, demonstrating that the increase in density is directly tied to improved overall site perfunnance. Access and Circulation Access to the development is provided via a private loop street aligned with Generation Avenue. The looped street design improves traffic flow, internal circulation, and emergency access throughout the site. Pedestrian infrastructure includes: 5-foot sidewalks along the private street system and 6-foot sidewalk along 150th Street North The development includes approxhuately 1,500 linear feet of sidewalks and pedestrian connections, supporting strong internal connectivity and walkability. Pg. 3 The private street will be owned and maintained by the homeowner's association, reducing long-term public maintenance obligations while maintaining full functionality. Street lighting, installed and maintained by Xcel Energy, is incorporated into the Development and the park area. Open Space, Park, and Stormwater Management The revised plan enhances the open space framework established in the previously approved development. The public park In the Southwest portion of the site has been increased from approximately 0.45 acres to approximately 0.50 acres. The park will provide recreational opportunities and pedestrian connectivity to 150th Street. Lighting and parking stalls are proposed adjacent to park and the developer has provided water and sewer access to park for the cities future uses. Additional open space has been incorporated into the central portion of the development, improving usability and reinforcing a pedestrian-oriented design. Stormwater management has been significantly improved by eliminating internal ponding and consolidating stormwater facilities to the northern portion of the site. Stormwater will be managed through a combination expansion of the existing stormwater pond to the north of this site. The grounds will be irrigated with water drawn from the stormwater basin rather than relying on potable water from the city system. The development will be served by publicly owned sanitary sewer and water installed to city standards within an easement. The storm drainage system will be maintained by the homeowner's association. The expanded stormwater basin utilizes an existing drainage and utility easement and is designed to meet City and watershed requirements while improving long-term performance and aesthetics. The landscaping proposed exceeds city standards and includes leaving existing trees in areas where possible. Trees at the west property line and park area will remain and the developer proposes additional tree planting at the north property line. Neighbor Coordination and Easement Improvements The developer has proactively notified the 3 adjacent property owners regarding the proposed stormwater improvements within the existing easement area. Work may include grading and limited tree removal necessary to accommodate the expanded basin. The developer has committed to restoration, replacement landscaping, and coordination with affected property owners to minimize impacts. Parking and Circulation Efficiency The development provides a total·ofapproximately 22~parking stalls, equating to 4$ stalls per unit. This includes garage, driveway, and guest parking. This level of parking exceeds typical requirements and supports both residents and visitors while minimizing the potential for congestion. The 50 town homes can be expected to generate on average 8 trips per unit per day or 400 total. The park will generate minimal vehicular traffic. Planned Unit Development (PUD) Criteria and Justification Section 90-141 of the City_of Hug9 Zoning_Code establishes the criteria required to jµstify the use of Planned Unit Development (PUD) zoning. The proposed development meets each of these criteria as outlined below: Criteria 1 -Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan Ordinance Language: The establishment of PUD zoning districts in appropriate settings and situations, to create or maintain a development pattern that complies with the city 1s comprehensive plan. Response: The proposed development is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan and planned land use designation for the property. The site is located between a single-family development to the north, town home developments to the east and south (approximately 6.5 units per acre), and a manufactured home park to the west (approximately 5.8 units per acre). The proposed density of approximately 7 .5 units per acre is consistent with surrounding development patterns and represents an appropriate transition between these uses. The mix of 2·, 3-, and 4-unit buildings provides a gradual transition between lower-density single-family homes and higher-density attached housing. Criteria 2-Mixing of Land Uses Ordinance Language: The mixing ofland uses within a developmentwhen such mixing of land uses eould not otherwise be accomplished under this chapter. Response: The development does not include a mix of land uses but does provide a variation of town home product types not widely present in the immediate area. Unlike nearby developments consisting primarily of uniform 4'unit or split'entry townhomes, the proposed development includes a mix of unit sizes and configurations, including possible units with main-level living options. This provides additional housing diversity and supports a broader range of residents. Criteria 3-Flexibility in Design and Development Standards Ordinance Language: Variations to the strict application of the land use regulations in this chapter in order to improve site design and operation, while at the same time incorporating design elements that exceed the city's standards to offset the effect of any variations. Response: The proposed development requests limited flexibility from the underlying zoning requirements, primarily related to building separation, where 20 feet is proposed compared to the standard 30 feet. This variation is consistent with typical single-family separation distances within the City and allows for a more efficient and coordinated site layout. The requested flexibility is offset by several enhancements that exceed City standard,,, including: Increased public park area (approximately 0.50 acres), Expanded and improved open space, Integrated pedestrian system with sidewalks and walkways, Enhanced landscaping and site design, Stormwater management exceeding requirements through the use of permanent wet basin along with the reuse for irrigation. The development maintains all required perimeter setbacks and does not reduce open space to achieve the increased density. Criteria 4-Efficient and Creative Use of Land Ordinance Language: A more creative and efficient approach to land use within the city, while at the same time protecting and promoting the health, safety, comfort, aesthetics, economic viability, and general welfare of the city. Pg.5 Response: The development represents a more efficient and creative use of the site through the refinement of the previously approved plan. Key improvements include: *Elimination of internal stormwater ponding Which provides more useable space. *Consolidation of stormwater management to the north *Loop street design improving circulation and emergency access *Reduced impervious surface through efficient street layout *The private street system reduces long-term public maintenance costs while maintaining full functionality. Criteria 5-Preservation and Enhancement of Natural Features and Open Space Ordinance Language: Preservation and enhancement of natural features and open spaces, including but not limited to greenway corridors, wooded areas, buffer areas, reduction of impervious surface, and utilization of joint facilities and utilities. Response: While the site does not contain significant natural features, the development enhances open space and environmental function through: *Expansion of the public park area *Creation of central open space for passive recreation *Expansion of the northern stormwater basin, improving drainage and aesthetics *Landscape buffering and tree planting The expanded pond also provides additional separation from properties to the north and contributes to long- term stormwater performance. Criteria 6-Efficiency of Public Streets and Utilities Response: The development improves infrastructure efficiency through the use of a private street system that will be constructed to City standards but maintained by the homeowner association. This approach: Reduces long-term public maintenance costs, Maintains full accessibility and serviceability, Supports efficient internal circulation.Public utilities, including water and sewer, will be installed and maintained in accordance with City standards. Criteria 7 -Establishment of Appropriate Transitions Ordinance Language: Establishment of appropriate transitions between differing land uses. Pg.6 Response: The development provides appropriate transitions to adjacent land uses through: Preservation of trees and additional landscaping along the west property line, Expansion of the stormwater basin to the north, creating separation from single-family homes, Use of varied building types to soften transitions between densities. The surrounding land uses to the east and south are similar in character, further supporting compatibility. Multi-Family Design Guidelines and Architectural Narrative Lennar Architectural Narrative Why this plan/product was selected Lennar studies market trends and chose a product that is most desired by customers. Our "Everything's Included" platform includes sought after features in our homes instead of offering them as optional addons. How it fits the site and surrounding area The property to the west is developed as a mobile home park and single-family homes, the property to the north is single family homes in the Sweetgrass Meadows development, and the property to the east is developed with townhomes. The property to the south is developed as townhomes in the Generation Acres development. How it meets or enhances the Intent of the PUD Lennar homes include a variety of design elements. This town home plan includes the use of both vinyl siding and shake siding with stone accents at each entry. The garages are recessed to the building entryways to break up the front of the building. Lennar designed the color packages to avoid monotony and to ensure a visually appealing streetscape. Additional design elements and features Lennar has been the largest developer for over 20 years. Lenna r's homes include: Ring Video Doorbell Pro, Ring Alarm Security Kit, Honeywell Home T6 Pro Smart Thermostat, Moen Eco-Performance Fixtures, ENERGY STAR Appliances, LED Lighting, Energy-Efficient Washer and Dryer, WaterSense Fixtures, Low-E Windows. Supplemental Design Narrative-City of Hugo Multi-Family Design Guidelines Alignment While the Lennar narrative outlines the market-driven product selection and included home features, the following provides additional detail regarding how the proposed architectural design aligns with the City of Hugo Multi-Family Design Guidelines. Building Massing and Articulation The proposed town home buildings incorporate variation in building massing and fa9ade articulation to avoid long, uninterrupted building planes. Consistent with City guidelines, the design include: Multiple wall plane offsets, Projecting window elements, Defined vertical breaks between units, Material transitions between unit groupings. These elements reduce the perceived scale of the buildings and prevent the "barracks-style" appearance discouraged by the City. Pg. 7 Roofline Variation The building elevations incorporate varied rooflines, including multiple front-facing gables and changes in ridge height across each building. This approach aligns with City guidance encouraging: Roofline variation, Visual interest along the street, A more residential architectural character. The proposed design successfully breaks up long root spans and creates a more dynamic and visually appealing streetscape. Material Variation and Architectural Detail The buildings utilize a combination of materials, including: Horizontal lap siding, Shake-style siding, Stone accents at building bases and entry points This material variation is consistent with City expectations tor high-quality design and helps avoid flat or monotonous building elevations. The use of stone at the base of the structure provides visual grounding and enhances overall architectural quality. Garage Treatment and Streetscape Design Garage placement and design are addressed in a manner consistent with City guidance to minimize garage dominance. The proposed design includes: Recessed garage doors set behind the primary fa9ade plane, architectural detailing above garage openings, integration of windows and materials to balance garage mass This design approach reduces the visual prominence of garages and supports a more pedestrian-oriented streetscape. Pedestrian Orientation and Neighborhood Integration The building design supports pedestrian-oriented development through: Clearly defined unit entries, integration with internal sidewalk systems, visual connection between building fronts and the street. These elements contribute to a cohesive neighborhood environment and align with the City's emphasis on walkability and community interaction. Architectural Variety and Neighborhood Character The combination of 2-unit, 3-unit, and 4-unit buildings further enhances architectural variety across the site. In addition to building variation, Lenna r's use of multiple color packages ensures that adjacent units do not repeat identical colors and materials, reducing monotony and enhancing the overall visual character of the development. Overall Compliance with City Design Intent The proposed architectural design meets and supports the intent of the City of Hugo Multi-Family Design Guidelines by: Providing varied and articulated building elevations, incorporating multiple materials and design elements, reducing garage dominance, creating a pedestrian-friendly streetscape, enhancing overall neighborhood character. The proposed design is consistent with and in several areas exceeds the City's expectations for multi-family residential development. Lennar is committed to working with the City to incorporate feedback and refine the exterior architectural design in a manner consistent with City guidelines and expectations. Pg.8 The proposed development meets all criteria required under Section 90-141 and demonstrates that the use of PUD zoning results in a more efficient, higher-quality, and better-integrated residential development. The flexibility requested is limited and is fully offset by measurable improvements in site design, open space, stormwater management, and overall neighborhood character. 40 Unit vs. 50 Unit Comparison Category 40 Unit Plan so Unit Plan Units 40 50 Park Size ~0.45 acres -0.50 acres Setbacks Established Maintained Open Space Functional Expanded Layout Approved More Efficient Construction 2phases 1 phase Conclusion The proposed 50-unit development represents a logical and well-supported progression of the previously approved plan. The revised layout improves site efficiency, enhances open space, and refines stormwater management while maintaining compatibility with surrounding uses. The development provides both private and public open space, incorporates sustainable stormwater practices, fits well with the surrounding area and will provide the current and future residents of Hugo with an undersupplied and affordable housing option. We Believe that the proposed development meets the intent of the Planned Unit Development ordinance, aligns with the Comprehensive Plan, and provides a high-quality residential neighborhood consistent with the City's long-term vision. I am available for any questions or to supply more information if needed. DRW Property Investments, LLC Oneka Lake Reserve, LLC CC: Elan Design lab, Inc.-Steve Johnston, PE-Principal Engineer Pg.9 From:Don Willenbring To:Max Gort Subject:HOA for Oneka lake Reserve Date:Wednesday, June 17, 2026 3:16:17 PM Max, Thank you for the information. In regards to the Oneka Lake Reserve HOA- The Homeowners Association (HOA) shall be responsible for the ownership, maintenance, repair, replacement, operation, and management of all common areas and common facilities within the development, including but not limited to: • Private streets, drives, and associated signage. • Sidewalks, trails, pathways, and pedestrian facilities located within common areas. • Street lighting and decorative lighting located within common areas. • Stormwater management facilities, including ponds, infiltration basins, rain gardens, drainage swales • Water quality and erosion control facilities required by permits or development approvals. • Common open space, outlots, landscape buffers, berms, and conservation areas not dedicated to a public entity. • Landscaping, trees, shrubs, turf, irrigation systems, and related improvements within common areas. • Entry monuments, fencing, retaining walls, screening features, decorative structures, and other community amenities located within common areas. Hope this is helps! Thank you, Don Willenbring DRW Property Investments, LLC VIP Realty, LLC 612-363-3915 15 0 T H S T R E E T N GENERATION AVENUE N DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 C-000 COVER SHEET LOCATION MAP PROJECT CONTACTS NOT TO SCALE DEVELOPER CIVIL ENGINEER STEVE JOHNSTON, PE T (612) 260-7982 ELAN DESIGN LAB, INC. 310 4TH AVE S, SUITE 1006 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT PILAR SARAITHONG, RLA T (612) 260-7982 LAND SURVEYOR DAN THURMES, LS T (651) 275-8969 CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC. 1970 NORTHWESTERN AVENUE, SUITE 200 STILLWATER, MN 55082 SHEET INDEX RESERVE HUGO - MINNESOTA APRIL 20, 2026 SITE NOT TO SCALE VICINITY MAP C-000 COVER SHEET A0 ARCHITECTURAL RENDERING A1 ARCHITECTURAL COVER A1.1E ELEVATIONS/ ROOF PLAN A3.1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN A3.2 SECOND FLOOR PLAN C-001 BOUNDARY AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY BY CORNERSTONE C-002 PRELIMINARY PLAT BY CORNERSTONE C-003 GENERAL NOTES C-010 DEMOLITION PLAN C-101 SITE PLAN C-200 OVERALL GRADING & EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN C-201 GRADING PLAN - AREA 1 C-202 GRADING PLAN - AREA 2 C-203 GRADING PLAN - AREA 3 C-204 GRADING PLAN - AREA 4 C-205 SWPPP C-301 UTILITY PLAN C-501 DETAILS C-502 DETAILS C-503 DETAILS C-504 DETAILS C-505 DETAILS L-101 LANDSCAPE PLAN L-501 LANDSCAPE DETAILS IR-1 IRRIGATION PLAN IR-2 IRRIGATION PLAN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CITY PLANNER ELAN DESIGN LAB, INC. 310 4TH AVE S, SUITE 1006 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 CITY ENGINEER CITY OF HUGO 6900 137TH STREET N HUGO, MN 55038 CITY OF HUGO 14669 FITZGERALD AVENUE N HUGO, MN 55038 ONEKA LAKE 170TH ST N 24 T H A V E N 35E 61 ONEKA LAKE R I C E L A K E EG G L A K E 137TH ST N FRENC H M A N R O A D MAIN ST 165TH ST N ONE K A L A K E B L V D N E G G L A K E R D N PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN AND REZONING REVIEW RACHEL JUBA T (651) 762-6304 MARK ERICHSON, PE T (651) 286-8463 ONEKA LAKE, LLC 2120 WILLENBRING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 DON WILLENBRING T (651) 363-3915 150TH ST N PID#1703121440 BENCHMARKS ELEVATIONS BASED ON GPS DERIVED VALUES FOR NAVD 88. PROJECT BENCHMARK SHOWN ON SURVEY. CONTACT: ST. CROIX HOME BUILDERS C/O NORM DUPREE PO BOX 186 STILLWATER, MN 55082 Ph. 651-303-0471 UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTING DRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THIS SURVEY HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL LOCATE TICKET NUMBER(S) 182533646. SOME MAPS WERE RECEIVED, WHILE OTHER UTILITIES DID NOT RESPOND TO THE LOCATE REQUEST. ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. COUNTY/CITY: REVISIONS: PROJECT LOCATION: DATE REVISION XXXX CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! TWIN CITY AREA:TOLL FREE:1-800-252-1166651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: 150TH STREET 1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON COORDINATES SUPPLIED BY THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE (NAD83). 2. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN PER GOPHER ONE LOCATES AND AS-BUILTS PLANS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF HUGO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 3. THERE MAY SOME UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, GAS, ELECTRIC, ETC. NOT SHOWN OR LOCATED. 4. CONTOURS SHOWN PER DNR LIDAR DATA OBTAINED FROM THE MNTOPO WEBSITE OUTSIDE OF PARCEL BOUNDARIES. FIELD TOPOGRAPHY DATED 1-3-19 INSIDE OF PARCEL BOUNDARIES. SURVEY NOTES: CITY O HUGO WASHINGTO COUNT Lot 1, Block 1, Oneka Lake Townhomes Second Addition, Washington County, Minnesota. Abstract. 9-11-18 INITIAL ISSUE CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Daniel L. Thurmes Registration Number: 25718 Date:__________________ TITLE NOTES: 0 NORTH 40 80 ND18002 SURVND02 EXISTING CONDITIONS C-001 LAND SURVEYING, CORNERSTO PROJECT NO. FILE NAME 9-11-18 Survey related matters as shown on the Chicago Title Insurance Company Title Commitment No. 67918 issued on July 16th, 2018. 1.Terms and conditions of Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants for Wetland Replacement, recorded as Document No. 3611650, which does not include any forfeiture or reversionary clause. 2.Terms and conditions of Development Agreement recorded as Document No. 3615491. 3.Easement(s) for drainage, utilities and roadway (Generation Circle) purposes as shown on the recorded plat. (DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT AND GENERATION CIRCLE AS DEDICATED ON THE PLAT OF ONEKA LAKE TOWNHOMES ARE SHOWN ON THE SURVEY. NO EASEMENTS OR PUBLIC RIGHTS OF WAY WERE DEDICATED ON THE PLAT OF ONEKA LAKE TOWNHOMES 2ND ADDITION. IT IS UNCLEAR IF THE DEDICATED EASEMENTS AND RIGHT OF WAY WERE VACATED PRIOR TO PLATTING THE 2ND ADDITION. NO DOCUMENTS WERE PROVIDED THAT SHOW ANY VACATION PROCEEDINGS.) 4.Subject to wetlands as shown on the plat and any associated wetland regulations. The following is not included in the hereinbefore described title commitment but appears to affect the subject property: An easement for the transmission of electrical energy as described in Book 150, Deeds, page 296, Washington County, Minnesota. (Easement area is not defined in said document and appears to be blanket in nature.) LEGEND UNDERGROUND ELECTRIC UNDERGROUND CABLE TV UNDERGROUND FIBER OPTIC UNDERGROUND TELEPHONE OVERHEAD UTILITY UNDERGROUND GAS SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER WATERMAIN FENCE CURB [TYPICAL] CONTOURS FOUND MONUMENT 1/2" IP MARKED RLS 15480 SET 1/2" IRON PIPE MARKED RLS NO. 25718 CABLE TV PEDESTAL AIR CONDITIONER ELECTRIC MANHOLE ELECTRIC METER ELECTRIC PEDESTAL ELECTRIC TRANSFORMER LIGHT POLE GUY WIRE POWER POLE GAS MANHOLE GAS METER TELEPHONE MANHOLE TELEPHONE PEDESTAL SANITARY CLEANOUT SANITARY MANHOLE CATCH BASIN STORM DRAIN FLARED END SECTION STORM MANHOLE FIRE DEPT. CONNECTION HYDRANT CURB STOP WATER WELL WATER MANHOLE WATER METER POST INDICATOR VALVE WATER VALVE BOLLARD FLAG POLE MAIL BOX TRAFFIC SIGN UNKNOWN MANHOLE SOIL BORING SPOT ELEVATION TRAFFIC SIGNAL CONIFEROUS TREE DECIDUOUS TREE AREA: TOTAL AREA AS SHOWN = 291,941 SQ.FT. DENOTES EXISTING ACCESS CONTROL AS SHOWN ON RECORD PLAT BUILDING LINE BITUMINOUS SURFACE CONCRETE SURFACE 1-8-19 SPOT ELEVATIONS ADDED Suite #200 1970 Northwestern Ave. Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 dan@cssurvey .net 6-5-20 PRELIMINARY PLAT ONEK LAKE RESERV 25 ' S E T B A C K 25' REAR BUILDING SETBACK 25 ' S E T B A C K 15' SIDE BUILDING SETBACK 25' REAR BUILDING SETBACK 15' SIDE BUILDING SETBACK 1 2 1 4 OUTLOT B (PARK) 5 3 11 12 13 5 1 9 8 7 6 6 71234 2 3 4 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 4 3 4 5 OUTLOT A 8 9 10 6 PID#1703121440 CONTACT: ST. CROIX HOME BUILDERS C/O NORM DUPREE PO BOX 186 STILLWATER, MN 55082 Ph. 651-303-0471 COUNTY/CITY: REVISIONS: PROJECT LOCATION: DATE REVISION XXXX CALL BEFORE YOU DIG! TWIN CITY AREA:TOLL FREE:1-800-252-1166651-454-0002 Gopher State One Call 150TH STREET CITY O HUGO WASHINGTO COUNT 9-11-18 INITIAL ISSUE CERTIFICATION: I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of the state of Minnesota. Daniel L. Thurmes Registration Number: 25718 Date:__________________ ONEK PRELIMINARY PL 0 NO R T H 40 80 ND18002A SURVND02A PRELIMINARY PLAT C-002 LAND SURVEYING, CORNERSTO PROJECT NO. FILE NAME 9-11-18 LOT AREAS (IN SQUARE FEET) Suite #200 1970 Northwestern Ave. Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone 651.275.8969 dan@cssurvey .net LAKE RESERV ZONED: R4 ZONING CURRENT ZONING : R4 PROPOSED ZONING : PUD ZONED: R4 ZO N E D : R 4 ZO N E D : R 4 ZO N E D : C R 3 ZONED: I-3 ZO N E D : R - 3 ZONED: R-3 OVER ALL OF OUTLOT A PROPOSED DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENTS: DENOTES PROPOSED DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENT LOT 1 BLOCK 1 2,565 LOT 2 BLOCK 1 2,564 LOT 1 BLOCK 2 2,562 LOT 2 BLOCK 2 1,952 LOT 3 BLOCK 2 2,562 LOT 4 BLOCK 2 2,562 LOT 5 BLOCK 2 2,562 LOT 6 BLOCK 2 2,548 LOT 7 BLOCK 2 1,952 LOT 8 BLOCK 2 1,952 LOT 9 BLOCK 2 2,562 LOT 1 BLOCK 3 2,562 LOT 2 BLOCK 3 1,952 LOT 3 BLOCK 3 1,952 LOT 4 BLOCK 3 2,562 LOT 1 BLOCK 4 2,562 LOT 2 BLOCK 4 1,952 LOT 3 BLOCK 4 1,952 LOT 4 BLOCK 4 2,562 LOT 1 BLOCK 5 2,562 LOT 2 BLOCK 5 1,952 LOT 3 BLOCK 5 2,562 LOT 4 BLOCK 5 2,562 LOT 5 BLOCK 5 1,952 LOT 6 BLOCK 5 2,562 LOT 7 BLOCK 5 2,562 LOT 8 BLOCK 5 1,952 LOT 9 BLOCK 5 1,952 LOT 10 BLOCK 5 2,562 LOT 1 BLOCK 6 2,562 LOT 2 BLOCK 6 1,952 LOT 3 BLOCK 6 1,952 LOT 4 BLOCK 6 2,562 LOT 5 BLOCK 6 2,562 LOT 6 BLOCK 6 1,952 LOT 7 BLOCK 6 2,562 LOT 8 BLOCK 6 2,554 LOT 9 BLOCK 6 1,952 LOT 10 BLOCK 6 2,562 LOT 11 BLOCK 6 2,694 LOT 12 BLOCK 6 1,954 LOT 13 BLOCK 6 3,134 LOT 14 BLOCK 6 2,562 LOT 15 BLOCK 6 1,952 LOT 16 BLOCK 6 1,952 LOT 17 BLOCK 6 2,562 LOT 18 BLOCK 6 2,583 LOT 19 BLOCK 6 1,968 LOT 20 BLOCK 6 1,968 LOT 21 BLOCK 6 2,583 OUTLOT A 153,451 OUTLOT B 21,827 TOTAL 291,941 TYPICAL LOT LAYOUT REFER TO SITE PLAN FOR SPECIFIC LOT DETAILS AS SETBACKS MAY VARY LOT LINE NO SCALE 5 1 2 PR I V A T E S T R E E T DR A I N A G E & UT I L I T Y EA S E M E N T DR A I N A G E & UT I L I T Y EA S E M E N T BL O C K N U M B E R 10 EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The following legal description is as shown on the Near North Title Group LLC, as agent for Old Republic National Title Insurance Company Title Commitment File No. MN2521339 issued on November 28th, 2025: Lot 1, Block 1, ONEKA LAKE TOWNHOMES 2ND ADDITION, Washington County, Minnesota. AREA: TOTAL AREA AS SHOWN = 291,941 SQ.FT. / 6.70 ACRES BENCHMARKS ELEVATIONS BASED ON GPS DERIVED VALUES FOR NAVD 88. PROJECT BENCHMARK SHOWN ON SURVEY. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES NOTES: THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION AND EXISTING DRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPRISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. THIS SURVEY HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. GOPHER STATE ONE CALL LOCATE TICKET NUMBER(S) 182533646. SOME MAPS WERE RECEIVED, WHILE OTHER UTILITIES DID NOT RESPOND TO THE LOCATE REQUEST. ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. 1. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON COORDINATES SUPPLIED BY THE WASHINGTON COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE (NAD83). 2. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN PER GOPHER ONE LOCATES AND AS-BUILTS PLANS PROVIDED BY THE CITY OF HUGO PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT. 3. THERE MAY SOME UNDERGROUND UTILITIES, GAS, ELECTRIC, ETC. NOT SHOWN OR LOCATED. 4. CONTOURS SHOWN PER DNR LIDAR DATA OBTAINED FROM THE MNTOPO WEBSITE OUTSIDE OF PARCEL BOUNDARIES. FIELD TOPOGRAPHY DATED 1-3-19 INSIDE OF PARCEL BOUNDARIES, SHOWN WITH SPOT ELEVATIONS. SURVEY NOTES: PORTIONS OF THIS PROPERTY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THIS LOT MAY LIE WITHIN ZONE A, AREAS DETERMINED TO BE WITHIN THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN ALL OTHER AREAS ARE LOCATED IN ZONE X, AREAS DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN AS SHOWN ON FEMA FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP NUMBER 27163C0136E HAVING AN EFFECTIVE DATE OF FEBRUARY 3RD, 2010. NOT BASE FLOOD ELEVATION SHOWN ON FEMA MAP. FLOOD INFORMATION: THERE ARE NO VISIBLE PARKING STALLS DESIGNATED ON THIS PARCEL INCLUDING 0 HANDICAP STALLS. EXISTING PARKING: ZO N E D : R - 3 END UNIT ZERO SETBACKS ZERO SETBACKS 10.5 PA T I O PA T I O 14.5 DRAINAGE & UTILITY EASEMENT 10 ' TY P 12' TYP 36 ' 14 . 5 ' 10 . 5 ' 22 ' MI N . 17' TYP 3' TYP 10'10'32'32' 10 ' TY P 12' TYP 36 ' 14 . 5 ' 10 . 5 ' 22 ' MI N . 17' TYP 3' TYP 32'32'10'10'32' 36 ' 32' 10 ' TY P 12' TYP 22 ' MI N . 17' TYP 3' TYP 32'32' 14 . 5 ' 10 . 5 ' 10'10'32' DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 C-003 GENERAL NOTES DEMOLITON NOTES 1.PROTECT ALL STRUCTURES AND LANDSCAPE NOT LABELED FOR DEMOLITION FROM DAMAGE DURING CONSTRUCTION. ANY ON-SITE OR OFF-SITE AREAS DISTURBED DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY DUE TO CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE RETURNED TO A CONDITION EQUAL TO OR BETTER THAN THE EXISTING CONDITION. CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY CIVIL PENALTIES RESULTING FROM THEIR WORK UNDER THIS CONTRACT. 2.NO DEMOLITION MATERIALS SHALL BE DISPOSED OF ON-SITE. ALL DEBRIS SHALL BE HAULED OFF-SITE TO A DISPOSAL AREA APPROVED BY APPROPRIATE GOVERNMENTAL AUTHORITIES FOR THE HANDLING OF DEMOLITION DEBRIS. WORK SITE SHALL BE LEFT IN A CONDITION THAT MINIMIZES EROSION POTENTIAL ON A NIGHTLY BASE. 3.LIMIT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TO THE CONSTRUCTION LIMITS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. IF WORK NEEDS TO EXTEND TO PUBLIC STREETS OR RIGHT OF WAY IT IS THE CONTRACTOR'S RESPONSIBILITY TO APPLY FOR ALL PERMITS, PREPARE ALL DRAWING AND PAY ALL FEES AND COST. ALL CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES SHALL COMPLY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES. 4.CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE SHALL BE IN PLACE PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF DEMOLITION OPERATIONS. SEE SHEET C-200 FOR ALL EROSION CONTROL MEASURES AND APPROPRIATE STAGING AND SEQUENCING. 5.PROVIDE NECESSARY BARRICADES, SUFFICIENT LIGHTS, SIGNS AND OTHER TRAFFIC CONTROL METHODS AS MAY BE NECESSARY FOR THE PROTECTION AND SAFETY OF THE PUBLIC AND MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT THE LIFE OF THE PROJECT. 6.REMOVE ALL VEGETATION WITHIN SITE AS NEEDED TO COMPLETE THE WORK EXCEPT AS NOTED. EXISTING VEGETATION TO REMAIN IF IT DOES NOT IMPACT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES. GENERAL NOTES 1.BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY TAKEN FROM SURVEY PERFORMED BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC., ON SEPTEMBER 11, 2018. ELAN DESIGN LAB CANNOT GUARANTY THE ACCURACY OR COMPLETENESS OF THIS INFORMATION. VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUND THAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIR CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED. 3.FOLLOW ALL RECOMMENDATIONS PRESENTED IN GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT PREPARED BY NTI ON 7/30/2020 (NO. 20.MSP10728.000) EXCEPT AS MODIFIED IN THESE SPECIFICATIONS OR PLANS, OR AS DIRECTED BY CITY OFFICIALS. 4.CONTRACTOR SHALL BRING ANY CHANGED OR UNFORESEEN CONDITIONS THAT COULD RESULT IN ADDITIONAL COST TO THE ATTENTION OF THE OWNER AND ENGINEER AS SOON AS THEY ARE DISCOVERED SO THAT THEY CAN BE PROPERLY DOCUMENTED. FAILURE TO NOTIFY OR COVERING UN-WITNESSED WORK SHALL RESULT IN REJECTION OF CLAIMS FOR ADDITIONAL COMPENSATION. 5.DIMENSIONS SHOWN ON THESE PLANS ARE TO BACK OF CURB AND EXTERIOR FACE OF BUILDING UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE. 6.ON-SITE CURB TO BE B618 AND SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER, UNLESS NOTED. 7.ALL PARKING STALLS TO BE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITE STRIPING. ACCESSIBLE SYMBOLS TO BE PAINTED IN WHITE AND ACCESSIBLE ACCESS AISLES AND CROSSWALKS TO BE PAINTED WITH A 4" WIDE WHITE PAINTED STRIPE 18 INCHES ON CENTER AND AT 45 DEGREE ANGLES TO STALL, WITH 'NO PARKING' MARKED. REFLECTORIZED PAINT SHALL COMPLY WITH MNDOT 3592. 1.VERIFY ALL FIELD CONDITIONS AND UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR UNKNOWN UTILITIES ARE FOUND THAT IMPACT DESIGN OR IMPAIR CONSTRUCTION, THE ENGINEER AND OWNER SHOULD BE IMMEDIATELY NOTIFIED. 2.ALL WORK TO COMPLY WITH CURRENT MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MNDOT) STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONSTRUCTION AND CITY OF HUGO SPECIFICATIONS, WHICHEVER IS MORE RESTRICTIVE, UNLESS NOTED. 3.ALL NON-GRANULAR SOILS, AND TOPSOIL SHALL BE REMOVED FROM WITHIN THE PROPOSED PAVEMENT AREAS AND BUILDING PADS. A GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER OR THEIR DESIGNATED REPRESENTATIVE SHALL OBSERVE THE PROJECT EXCAVATIONS TO VERIFY THAT MATERIALS HAVE BEEN PROPERLY REMOVED FROM PROPOSED STRUCTURAL AREAS, THAT ADEQUATE BEARING SUPPORT IS PROVIDED BY THE EXPOSED SOILS AND THAT STRUCTURAL FILL IS PLACED APPROPRIATELY. THE EXPOSED SOIL AT THE BASE OF FOOTINGS OR THICKENED SLAB SHALL BE COMPACTED TO 98 PERCENT PROCTOR DRY DENSITY (ASTM D698). 4.VERIFY THAT SOIL IN THE BOTTOM OF ALL SWALES IS FREE DRAINING. REPLACE WITH CLEAN SAND TO ELEVATION 928 AS NEEDED. 5.SALVAGE AND RESPREAD A MINIMUM OF 6" TOPSOIL OVER ALL TURFED AREAS. INSTALL 18" OF TOPSOIL IN SHRUB AND PERENNIAL BEDS. 6.ON-SITE GRANULAR SOIL IS GENERALLY SUITABLE FOR STRUCTURAL FILL. SILTY OR ORGANIC SOILS SHALL NOT BE USED FOR STRUCTURAL FILL. PLACEMENT OF STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL BE OBSERVED AND TESTED BY AN EXPERIENCED TECHNICIAN OR ENGINEER TO VERIFY THAT PROPER COMPACTION HAS BEEN ACHIEVED. STRUCTURAL FILL SHALL BE MOISTURE CONDITIONED (DRIED OR WETTED) AS APPROPRIATE PRIOR TO PLACEMENT. MOISTURE CONDITIONED ENGINEERED FILL SHALL BE PLACED AND COMPACTED IN LOOSE LIFTS OF 8 INCHES OR LESS. EACH LIFT OF FILL SHOULD BE COMPACTED BY LARGE VIBRATORY EQUIPMENT UNTIL THE IN-PLACE SOIL DENSITY IS EQUAL TO OR GREATER THAN THE CRITERIA ESTABLISHED WITHIN THE FOLLOWING TABULATION. IMPORTED SOIL SHALL BE APPROVED FOR INTENDED USE BY GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER PRIOR TO BRINGING TO THE SITE. TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION COMPACTION CRITERIA MOISTURE CONTENT VARIANCE FROM OPTIMUM (% RESPECTIVE PROCTOR) NON-ENGINEERED FILL (GREEN SPACE) 95 ENGINEERED FILL BELOW FOUNDATIONS 98 ENGINEERED FILL BELOW FLOOR SLABS 98 7.SIDEWALLS SHALL BE RETAINED BENCHED OR SLOPED TO PROVIDE SAFE WORKING CONDITIONS. THE CONTRACTOR IS SOLELY RESPONSIBLE FOR ASSESSING THE STABILITY OF AND EXECUTING PROJECT EXCAVATIONS USING SAFE METHODS. THE CONTRACTOR IS ALSO RESPONSIBLE FOR NAMING THE “COMPETENT INDIVIDUAL” AS PER SUBPART P OF 29 CFR 1926.6 (FEDERAL REGISTER - OSHA). 8.CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE DESIGN OF SOIL, UTILITY AND BUILDING RETENTION SYSTEMS. -3 TO +3% FOR SAND AND GRAVEL SOILS GRADING SPECIFICATIONS -3 TO +3% FOR SAND AND GRAVEL SOILS -3 TO +3% FOR SAND AND GRAVEL SOILS UTILITY SPECIFICATIONS 1.VERIFY ALL CONNECTIONS TO EXISTING UTILITY SERVICES PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ANY DISCREPANCIES BETWEEN LOCATED UTILITIES AND THE EXISTING CONDITIONS PLAN SHOULD BE NOTED AND FORWARDED TO THE ENGINEER. 2.PIPE LENGTHS SHOWN ARE MEASURED FROM CENTER OF STRUCTURE TO CENTER OF STRUCTURE. 3.PIPE MATERIALS: WATERMAIN 8" PVC (C-900) HYDRANT LEADS 6" DIP WATER SERVICE 1" TYPE K COPPER OR POLYETHYLENE SDR-7 SANITARY SEWER 8" PVC (SDR 45) SANITARY SEWER SERVICE 4" PVC (SDR 26) STORM SEWER DUAL-WALL HDPE WITH WATER TIGHT JOINTS PVC (SCH 40) OR RCP DRAIN TILE 4" PERFORATED PVC (SCH 40) 4.ALL UTILITY CONSTRUCTION TO CONFORM WITH STATE, CITY ENGINEER'S ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA (CEAM), AND CITY OF HUGO STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS, WHICHEVER IS MORE RESTRICTIVE. 5.ADJUST ALL STRUCTURES, PUBLIC AND PRIVATE, TO PROPOSED GRADES WHERE DISTURBED. COMPLY WITH ALL REQUIREMENTS OF UTILITY OWNERS. STRUCTURES BEING RESET TO PAVED AREAS TO MEET OWNERS REQUIREMENTS FOR TRAFFIC LOADING. 6.PROVIDE A MINIMUM 7.5' TO A MAXIMUM OF 10' OF COVER OVER ALL NEW WATERMAIN. 7.SEE DETAIL A5/C-504 FOR WATER LINE THRUST RESTRAINT. 8.SEE DETAILS C1 AND D1/C-504 FOR PIPE BEDDING. 9.DEFLECT WATER MAIN OR SERVICES AT LEAST 18" BELOW AT STORM OR SANITARY CROSSINGS WHERE VERTICAL SEPARATION IS LESS THAN 18" ABOVE OR BELOW THE PIPE. PROVIDE 4' WIDE INSULATION CENTERED ON ALL CROSSINGS WITH LESS THAN 36" VERTICAL CLEARANCE. A1 TYPICAL - 2 UNIT BUILDING 1" = 50' STREET AND SIDEWALK SPECIFICATIONS 1.PAVEMENT: SEE DETAILS SHEET C-501 FOR BITUMINOUS AND CONCRETE PAVEMENT SECTION. 2.CONCRETE MIX NO. 3F52 (MNDOT 2461) SHALL BE USED FOR HAND PLACED FORMED CURB AND GUTTER, MEDIANS, DRIVEWAYS, CROSS GUTTERS, SIDEWALKS, PEDESTRIAN RAMPS AND MEDIANS. CONCRETE MIX NO. 3F32, MNDOT SPECIFICATION 2461) SHALL BE USED FOR AN EXTRUSION MACHINE PLACEMENT OF CONCRETE. IN THE PRODUCTION OF CONCRETE, AN AIR ENTRAINING AGENT SHALL BE ADDED TO THE MIX ACCORDING TO MNDOT 2461.4. 3.FORM COATING MATERIAL SHALL MEET MNDOT 3902. 4.CONCRETE INSTALLATION SHALL CONFORM WITH MNDOT 2531. 5.SITE CONCRETE FINISHING - CONCRETE SHALL BE STRUCK TRUE TO CROSS SECTION AS SHOWN ON THE PLANS. NO ADDITIONAL WATER MAY BE ADDED TO AID IN THE FINISHING PROCESS. A LIGHT BROOM FINISH WILL BE REQUIRED AT RIGHT ANGLES TO THE CENTER LINE ON ALL CONCRETE WORK UNLESS DIRECTED OTHERWISE. ALL EXPOSED EDGES AND JOINTS IN CURB,GUTTER, SIDEWALK AND STEPS SHALL BE ROUNDED WITH A SUITABLE EDGING TOOL. BEFORE FINAL FINISHING, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CHECK THE CONCRETE WITH A TEN (10) FOOT STEEL STRAIGHT EDGE TO ENSURE THERE IS NO VARIATION GREATER THAN 3/16”FROM THE STRAIGHT EDGE ON TANGENT LINES OR GRADES. IF DEVIATIONS GREATER THAN 3/16” ARE FOUND THE WORK WILL BE CONSIDERED AS UNACCEPTABLE AND WILL BE REQUIRED TO BE REMOVED AND REPLACED AT NO EXPENSE TO THE OWNER. 6.CONCRETE CURING SHALL BE PERFORMED BY APPLYING A MEMBRANE CURING COMPOUND (TYPE 2, WHITE PIGMENTED, MNDOT 3754) TO THE EXPOSED SURFACE OF THE CONCRETE WITHIN ONE (1)HOUR AFTER FINISHING THE CONCRETE SURFACES. WHEN THE FORMS ARE REMOVED IN LESS THAN 72 HOURS AFTER PLACING THE CONCRETE, THE CURING COMPOUND SHALL BE APPLIED IMMEDIATELY TO THE EXPOSED SURFACES. THE RATE OF APPLICATION OF CURING COMPOUND SHALL BE 150 SQUARE FEET PER GALLON. THE COMPOUND SHALL APPEAR AS WHITE AS A SHEET OF PAPER AFTER APPLICATION ON THE CONCRETE SURFACE. 7.PREFORMED EXPANSION JOINTS SHALL MEET MNDOT 3702, AND SHALL BE PROVIDED AT THE FOLLOWING LOCATIONS: AT THE BEGINNING AND END OF ALL CURB AND GUTTER RADII. WHERE NEW CONCRETE SURROUNDS, ADJOINS, OR ABUTS ANY EXISTING FIXED OBJECTS SUCH AS FIRE HYDRANTS, BUILDING FOUNDATIONS, CONCRETE DRIVEWAYS, SIDEWALKS, AND OTHER RIGID STRUCTURES. AFTER EACH LOAD OF CONCRETE WHEN PLACING CURB AND EVERY 100 FEET WHEN PLACING SIDEWALK. CONTRACTION JOINTS WILL NOT BE SEALED BUT WILL BE REQUIRED AT A SPACING OF 10 FEET ON CURB AND GUTTER AND ON SIDEWALK CONSTRUCTION AS SHOWN ON THE PLAN. CONTRACTION JOINTS WILL BE CUT TO A DEPTH 1/3 THE THICKNESS OF THE CONCRETE, SURFACE AND BACK OF ALL CURBS. CONTRACTION JOINTS SHALL BE PLACED SO THAT NO SLAB IS LARGER THAN 100 SQUARE FEET IN AREA. THE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR CONSTRUCTING CONTRACTION JOINTS THAT PREVENT CONCRETE FROM CRACKING AT OTHER LOCATIONS. 8.CONCRETE TESTING INCLUDING SLUMP, AIR ENTRAINMENT, TEMPERATURE AND COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH SHALL BE PERFORMED ON THE FIRST LOAD OF THE DAY FOR ALL CONCRETE POURS OF AT LEAST 4 CUBIC YARDS. AN ADDITIONAL TEST SHALL BE PERFORMED FOR EACH 100 CUBIC YARDS OR PORTION THEREOF. A2 TYPICAL - 3 UNIT BUILDING 1" = 50'A2 TYPICAL - 4 UNIT BUILDING 1" = 50' BH-1 11/15/04 927.6 BH-5 11/15/04 927.2 BH-3 11/15/04 929.1 BH-4 11/15/04 928.0 SB 8 WTR 926.8* SB 2 WTR 929.5* SB 3 WTR 930.0* SB 4 WTR 930.0* SB 5 WTR 928.0* 8/3/20 928.0 8/14/20 927.8 10/9/20 927.3 9/9/21 925.2 SB 6 WTR 928.0* 8/3/20 928.1 9/14/20/ 928.2 10/9/20 926.9 9/9/21 925.4 SB 7 WTR 928.9* 8/3/20 928.5 8/14/20 928.9 10/9/20 927.3 9/9/21 925.6 SB 9 WTR 927.6* SB 1 WTR 927.5* SB 10 WTR 929.5* WATER LEVEL 8/1/20 929.0 10/9/20 927.8 WATER LEVEL 8/1/20 929.8 10/9/20 928.6 BH-2 11/15/04 928.2 BH-6 11/15/04 927.9 PROTECT ALL TREES & VEGETATION WITHIN TREE PROTECTED AREA SAW CUT & REMOVE BITUMINOUS REMOVE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE CURB & GUTTER PROTECT WATER SERVICE PROTECT SANITARY SERVICE PROTECT UTILITY SERVICES REMOVE SANITARY & WATER SERVICES TO MAIN RETAIN SANITARY & WATER SERVICES FOR POTENTIAL FUTURE PARK USE REMOVE TREES PROTECT TREES REMOVE FENCE REMOVE FENCE PROTECT UTILITY SERVICES REMOVE TREE REMOVE TREE PROTECT TREES TREE PROTECTION FENCE SEE SHEET C-201 TREE PROTECTION FENCE SEE SHEET C-201 REMOVE & REPLACE CURB AND PAVEMENT AS NEEDED FOR NEW UTILITY SERVICES PROTECT SANITARY SEWER PROTECT WATERMAIN REMOVE TREES REMOVE TREES PROTECT TREE REMOVE SMALL TREES AND ALL BRUSH UNLESS NOTED PROTECT TREES REMOVE & REPLACE PAVEMENT AS NEEDED TREE PROTECTION FENCE SEE SHEET C-201 PAVEMENT ENCROACHMENT TO REMAIN 1 DEMOLITION PLAN 1" = 30' 9030 SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. R LEGEND DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 C-010 DEMOLITION PLANREMOVE BITUMINOUS REMOVE CURB & GUTTER REMOVE TREE REMOVE TREE & BRUSH 15 0 T H S T R E E T N GENERATION AVENUE N 25 ' S E T B A C K 25' REAR BUILDING SETBACK 25 ' S E T B A C K 15' SIDE BUILDING SETBACK 1 2 1 25' REAR BUILDING SETBACK 15' SIDE BUILDING SETBACK B U I L D I N G N BUILDING H BUILDING J BUIL D I N G M BUILDING B BUILDING L BUILDING G BUILDING F BUILDING K BUILDING I BUILDING E BUILDING D BU I L D I N G C BUILDING A 4 OUTLOT B (PARK) 5 3 11 12 13 5 1 9 8 7 6 6 71234 2 3 4 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 EXISTING STORMWATER BASIN OUTLET 930.2 HWL 931.2 COMMON SPACE 2 BLOCK 1 BUILDING O BLOCK 2 OUTLOT A1234 BL O C K 2 BLOCK 3BLOCK 4 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 6 OUTLOT A EXPANDED STORMWATER BASIN FOREBAY 8 9 10 OUTLOT A OUTLOT A BLOCK 6 BLOCK 6 5' CROSSWALK, 2' WIDE BARS SPREAD 5' ON CENTER C2 C-501 CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP) ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (TYP) 25' 6' 5' 5' 6' CONCRETE WALK 5' CONCRETE WALK 5' CONCRETE WALK 17' TYP 17 ' TY P STOP SIGN C4 C-502 TYPICAL STREET SECTION BITUMINOUS DRIVE PAVEMENT SECTION (TYP) A1 C-501 E5 C-501 ACCESSIBILITY CURB RAMP (TYP) 6' 1' C1 C-502 EXISTING TREESEXISTING TREES 1' 6'9' 8.9' 22 ' CONCRETE PATIO (TYP) CONCRETE PATIO (TYP) CONCRETE PATIO (TYP) 3' CONCRETE WAK (TYP) CURB TRANSITION (TYP) E6 C-501 SIDEWALK JOINT (TYP) A3 C-502 6' CONCRETE WALK 3' CONCRETE WALK (TYP) 1 17 ' 16 . 5 ' TY P 25 . 3 4 ' B - B 5' 6' 25 . 3 4 ' B - B 6' 3 4 R88 ' R25' R25' 5. 9 7 ' 5' 22 ' 4 4 25 . 3 4 ' B - B 18 ' 3 R1 1 2 ' A1 C-003 3 UNIT BUILDING (TYP) B1 C-003 2 UNIT BUILDING (TYP) BITUMINOUS TRAIL BOULDER RETAINING WALL AT RIP RAP ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (TYP) CURB MODIFICATION AT CATCH BASIN (TYP) A1 C-502 B618 CURB & GUTTER (TYP) C1 C-501 8' CURB TRANSITION FROM B618 TO SURMOUNTABLE CURB 9' TYP R3 . 6 7 ' R 3 . 6 7 ' 20 ' 6' 5' 18' 9 ' T Y P 14 3 . 7 ' 20' 45'40.7' BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION (TYP) E4 C-501 6' 9' T Y P 22'22' R 3 . 6 7 ' R3.6 7 ' 9' TYP 18 ' 5. 6 7 ' 14 ' 25 ' 3 4 25' R88 ' R3.6 7 ' R3.67' 55 . 0 4 ' 46.1' 20 ' R56.67' R33 ' 5.67' 18' 17.5' R3.67 ' R3. 6 7 ' 47 . 7 ' 25' 25.11' 6' 27.77 ' 20.24' 9' TYP R 1 1 2 ' R 3 . 6 7 ' R 3 . 6 7 ' 17' T Y P 18 . 3 ' R15' R57 ' R33' 43.83' 1 8 ' 5 . 6 7 ' 22 ' BOULDER RETAINING WALL (TYP) 31 . 3 ' 28 . 4 ' 25 . 2 ' 25 ' 25.07' 9' TYP R11 1 . 6 7 ' 17' T Y P 28.87' 29.2 6 ' R111 . 6 7 ' R1 1 1 . 6 7 ' R2 8 8 ' R 3 1 2 ' R15' 19 . 8 9 ' 25' 28 . 3 3 ' 19. 1 4 ' 29.68' 23' F- F 6'5' 22' 30. 7 ' 18 ' R3 . 6 7 ' R 3 . 6 7 ' 45.2' 20 ' 12' 9' TY P 1 8 ' 21 . 3 ' SURMOUNTABLE CURB (TYP) C1 C-501 SURMOUNTABLE CURB (TYP) 6' 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 R 1 5 ' 1 3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1 1 TYPICAL STREET SECTION AT 150TH STREET B3 C-501 TYPICAL STREET SECTION AT PARKING B1 C-501 COMMON MAILBOX 25.34' B-B 22.42' F-F 2 2 ' 5 ' 6 ' 2 5 . 3 4 ' B - B 1 43.34 ' B - B 22 . 4 2 ' F - F 23 . 2 1 ' F - F 2 24 ' F - F ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (TYP) SURMOUNTABLE CURB BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION (TYP) CONCRETE FLUME C4 C-501 D5 C-501 LIGHTING (TYP) LIGHTING (TYP) EXISTING LIGHT POLE LIGHTING (TYP) R30 ' R1 1 0 ' R80 ' R30' R 2 ' T Y P R 1 1 0 ' R3. 6 7 ' R3 . 6 7 ' 8' R1 0 0 ' R1 0 0 ' PARK IMPROVEMENTS TO BE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTED BY CITY BITUMINOUS TRAIL A1 SITE PLAN 1" = 30' 9030 SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. RLEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK OR PAVEMENT DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 PHASE I PROJECT SUMMARY C-101 SITE PLANSITE AREA 291,941 SF. (6.70 AC.) PARK 22,843 SF. (0.52 AC.) NET AREA 269,098 SF. (6.18 AC.) BUILDINGS 57,600 SF. (21.4%) WALK/ PARKING/ DRIVE/ STREET 82,789 SF. (30.8%) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 140,389 SF. (52.2%) PERVIOUS 128,709 SF. (47.8%) TOTAL 50 UNITS (8 UNITS/ AC) 2 - 2 UNIT BUILDINGS 6 - 3 UNIT BUILDINGS 7 - 4 UNIT BUILDINGS PROPOSED PARKING 225 STALLS (4.5 STALL/ UNIT) 100 GARAGE PARKING STALLS 100 GUEST PRIVATE PARKING STALLS 25 - 9'X18' SHARED GUEST PARKING STALLS 1PERVIOUS AREA PARKING STALL COUNTX 2' CURB TAPER FROM 6" TO 4" 2 B618 CURB MODIFICATION AT CATCHBASIN 3 SURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER AT CATCHBASIN POND STORAGE HWL BITUMINOUS DRIVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BITUMINOUS TRAIL 18’ FIBERGLASS DIRECT BURIED LIGHT POLE WITH TRADITIONAL STYLE LED FIXTURE, BLACK COLOR SEE A1/C-203 15 0 T H S T R E E T N GENERATION AVENUE N WSB POND 1 NODE 1PP OUTLET 930.2 OVERFLOW 930.5 HWL 931.2 (EXISTING) HWL 931.2 (PROPOSED) 1 2 1 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X WSB POND 2 NODE 2PP OUTLET 930.2 HWL 931.4 (EXISTING) HWL 931.2 (PROPOSED) 4 OUTLOT B (PARK) 5 X X X X X X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXX 3 11 12 13 5 1 9 8 7 6 6 71234 2 3 4 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2 OUTLOT A1234 BL O C K 2 BLOCK 3BLOCK 4 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 6 OUTLOT A > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> 8 9 10 >> >> >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> FFE 935.05 GFE 934.35 FF E 9 3 5 . 4 GF E 9 3 4 . 7 FFE 935.05 GFE 934.35 FFE 934.7 GFE 934.0 FFE 934.9 GFE 934.2 FFE 935.3 GFE 934.6 FFE 935.4 GFE 934.7 FFE 936.2 GFE 935.5 FFE 9 3 6 . 2 GFE 9 3 5 . 5 FFE 935.2 GFE 934.50 FFE 935.2 GFE 934.50 FFE 935.7 GFE 935.0 FFE 935.9 GFE 935.2 FFE 935.7 GFE 935.0 FFE 935.8 GFE 935.10 OUTLOT A OUTLOT A BLOCK 6 BLOCK 6 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X XXXX X X X X X X EXPANDED WSB POND 1 NODE 3P ADDITIONAL STORAGE 930.2-931.2 =18,850 CF WQv 922-929 46,720 CF FOREBAY NODE F HWL 931.2 POND J OUTLET 930.42 HWL 932.7 POND G OUTLET 930.18 HWL 932.7 POND B OUTLET 929.69 HWL 932.7 POND I OUTLET 930.82 HWL 931.8 93 1 93 2 93 0 92 8 92 6 92 4 92 9 92 7 92 5 93 3 932 933 934 933 932 931 932 931 931 932 933 934 932 935 934 933 932 935 934 934 931 932. 5 933 934 932.5 92 2 92 3 932 93 1 93 2 93 0 92 8 92 6 92 9 92 7 93 3 931 932 930 928 929 927 933 931 932 933 933 93 4 933 934 935 935 93 4 93 5 93 4 93 5 935 935 9 3 5 935 935 93 5 9 3 4 934934934 934 934 93 4 93 4 9 3 4 9 3 4 934933 935 93 4 9 3 4 934 934 9 3 4 93 3 93 4 934 934 934 932 9 3 8 9 3 6 9 3 4 9 3 2 9 2 9 934 934 934 92 7 925 935 935 935 935 >>926 934 934 934 933 934 933 936 937 935 934 934 TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) SILT FENCE (TYP) SILT FENCE (TYP) SILT FENCE (TYP) EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (TYP) A2 C-503 A1 C-503 SILT FENCE (TYP) D1 C-503 TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) A4 C-503 CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE C3 C-503 INLET PROTECTION (TYP) C6 C-503 DITCH CHECK (TYP) PROVIDE EROSION CONTROL SEEDING FOR ACTUAL DISTURBED AREA WHICH MAY DIFFER FROM WHAT IS SHOWN BASED ON CONTRACTOR'S MEANS AND METHODS. SEE A1/C-201 SEE A1/C-202 SEE A1/C-204 INSTALL SILT FENCE AND MAINTAIN AS DREDGING PROGRESSES INLET PROTECTION (TYP) INLET PROTECTION (TYP) INLET PROTECTION (TYP) DITCH CHECK (TYP) INLET PROTECTION (TYP) INLET PROTECTION (TYP) INLET PROTECTION (TYP) RIP RAP (TYP) C1 C-503 TREE PROTECTION FENCE (TYP) TURBIDITY CURTAIN INLET PROTECTION (TYP)INLET PROTECTION (TYP) RIP RAP (TYP) RIP RAP (TYP) OVERFLOWA5 C-502 A1 OVERALL GRADING & EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 1" = 30' 9030 SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. R DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 C-200 OVERALL GRADING & EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN LEGEND TREE PROTECTION FENCE SILT FENCE - INSTALL BEFORE START OF CONSTRUCTION SOD & LANDSCAPE PLANTING SEE SHEET L-101 RIP RAP SPILLWAY DITCH CHECK STORM STRUCTURE PROTECTION TURBIDITY CURTAIN MNDOT SOUTHERN TALLGRASS ROADSIDE (STR) BROADCAST SEEDING SEEDING RATE PLS 26 LBS/AC.IMPERVIOUS PERVIOUS EXISTING PROPOSED BUILDING TOTAL IMPV NPDES AREA SUMMARY 0 ACRES PAVEMENT 0.033 ACRES TOTAL 7.210 ACRES 1.322 ACRES 2.632 ACRES 0.033 ACRES 7.177 ACRES 7.210 ACRES 3.954 ACRES 3.256 ACRES NO MOW FINE FESCUE LAWN BROADCAST SEEDING SEEDING RATE PLS 250 LBS/AC. MNDOT WET DITCH (W) BROADCAST SEEDING SEEDING RATE PLS 20 LBS/AC. EROSION CONTROL BLANKET - NAG DS150 OR APPROVED EQUAL ALL OTHER AREAS TO BE STABILIZED WITH SOIL TACKIFIER OR DISC ANCHORED STRAW AT THE RATE OF 2,000 LBS/AC. TEMPORARY SEEDING COVER CROP RATE PLS 100 LBS/AC. SPRING: OAT (O) FALL: WINTER WHEAT (WW) SILT FENCE - INSTALL AFTER CONSTRUCTION BUILDING J BUILDING F BUILDING I BUILDING E BUILDING D > > > > > > > > >> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> >> >> >> > > >>>>>>>>>> >> >> 4+00 5+006+00 7+00 7+21.73 6+18.75 6+75 4+65 5+30 FFE 935.05 GFE 934.35 933.19 933.88 HP 933.49 33.88HP 933.16 932.95 932.65 933.25 0.6%0.6%0.6%0.78%0.6%0.6%0.78% 933.88TBC933.34TBC 2. 1 4 % 4. 5 % 933.59TBC 933.88TBC3. 4 5 % 2. 1 4 % FFE 935.05 GFE 934.35 0.6% 0. 6 % 0. 6 % FFE 934.7 GFE 934.0 933.34TBC 3.9% 933.45TBC 2.5% 933.34TBC 2.3% 933.53HP 0. 6 % 0. 6 % 933.65SW 3. 9 % 934.03SW2. 1 % 933.72SW3. 6 % 933.85SW3. 0 % 934.02SW 2. 2 % FFE 935.2 GFE 934.50 GFE 934.50 934.8 934.8 934.8934.6 (TYP) 934.6 (TYP) 934.8934.8 934.5 934.2 933.70933.20 933.95 934.8 934.65 934.65 934.65 934.65 934.65 934.65 934.45(TYP)934.45(TYP) 933.21TBC 4. 1 % 933.16 934.09933.59 933.35 934.25933.75 934.30934.30 934.30 934.30 934.50 934.50 934.10(TYP) 934.30(TYP) HWL(TYP) HWL(TYP) HWL(TYP) 934.55 934.55 934.55 934.25 4: 1 ( T Y P ) 4: 1 ( T Y P ) 4:1 (TYP) 934.20 934.20 934.7 934.7 934.7 934.40 934.9 933.5 EOF EOF 933.55 EOF 933.55 934.0 933.5 EOF CENTERLINE OF DRAINAGE SWALE (TYP) 933 932 933 934 93 1 93 2 93 0 92 8 92 6 92 9 92 7 93 3 931 932 930 928 929 927 933 931 932 933 934934 934 934 934 93 4 934 934 934 932 934 92 7 925 >>>>926 930.7 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C-203 MA T C H L I N E SE E S H E E T C - 2 0 2 B6 C-201 >>>> TW 932BW 931 TW 933.5BW 931 TW 933BW 931 TW 933BW 932 PLACE & BLEND BOULDER WALL AND CLASS II RIP RAP. BOULDER TO MATCH RIP RAP MATERIAL C4-A C-501 C4-B C-501 A1 GRADING PLAN - AREA 1 1" = 20' 6020 SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. R DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 C-201 GRADING PLAN AREA 1 B6 ENLARGED GRADING PLAN 1" = 10' LEGEND MAJOR EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR PROPOSED CONTOUR 930.00' ± MATCH MATCH EXISTING 930.00' HP HIGH POINT LOW POINT TOP OF CURB 930.00' LP 930.00' TBC 1086 1085 NOTES 1.SEE SHEET C-003 FOR GRADNIG AND DRAINAGE NOTES. 2.PROVIDE 2.0% SLOPE ON PATIOS. EXPOSE PATIO FOUNDATIONS TO A MAXIMUM 8" HEIGHT WHERE SLOPE CANNOT BE TIED OUT AT A MAXIMUM 4:1 SLOPE. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SIDEWALK930.00' SW EOF 15 0 T H S T R E E T N B U I L D I N G N BUILDING B BUILDING I BUILDING D BU I L D I N G C BUILDING A 2+00 3+00 1+24.52 =14+36.45 3+22.8 >> >> >> >> >> FF E 9 3 5 . 4 GF E 9 3 4 . 7 33.88HP 0.6% 0.6% 933.42 0.6% 933.57TBC2. 1 4 % 3. 6 % 933.46TBC 933.73TBC 933.98TBC 2.0% 4.4 % 4.1 % 933.81SW 3. 2 % 934.16SW 3.8% 934.55SW 1.9% 2. 2 % FFE 935.2 GFE 934.50 FFE 935.7 GFE 935.0 FFE 935.9 GFE 935.2 FFE 935.7 GFE 935.0 934.8 934.8 935.3 933.09 933.06 932.86 932.70 933.38 935.3 933.38 933.42 933.7 933.85 934.2HPEOF 934.65 934.65 934.45(TYP) 935.0 935.0 935.0 935.0 934.8(TYP) 934.28 933.9 934.7 934.6 3.2% 2.0% 2.1% 2.0% 2.1% 934.65 934.65 934.5 934.2 935.5 935.5 935.3 935.5 935.5 935.1(TYP) 935.3(TYP) 935.3 935.3 935.3 934.4 934.9 934.28 933.92 934.06 933.70 934.55 4: 1 ( T Y P ) 934.7 933.05 932.85 932.55EOF 934.9 934.9 935.4 935.0 935.2 935.2 935.2 935.1 933.55 TW 934.5BW 933.0 935.2 935.4 934.5 CENTERLINE OF DRAINAGE SWALE (TYP) 932 933 933 93 4 933 934 935 935 93 4 93 5 93 4 93 5 935 93 5 9 3 4 934 93 4 9 3 4 934 9 3 4 SE E S H E E T C - 2 0 1 MA T C H L I N E SEE SHEET C-204 MATCHLINE 3 FFE 935.05 GFE 934.35 A1 GRADING PLAN - AREA 2 1" = 20' 6020 SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. R DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 C-202 GRADING PLAN AREA 2 LEGEND MAJOR EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR PROPOSED CONTOUR 930.00' ± MATCH MATCH EXISTING 930.00' HP HIGH POINT LOW POINT TOP OF CURB 930.00' LP 930.00' TBC 1086 1085 NOTES 1.SEE SHEET C-003 FOR GRADNIG AND DRAINAGE NOTES. 2.PROVIDE 2.0% SLOPE ON PATIOS. EXPOSE PATIO FOUNDATIONS TO A MAXIMUM 8" HEIGHT WHERE SLOPE CANNOT BE TIED OUT AT A MAXIMUM 4:1 SLOPE. 3.SHIFT GUTTER LOW POINT TO MATCH "FOXHOLE" INLET. GUTTER ELEVATION 933.09 EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SIDEWALK930.00' SW EOF BUILDING H BUILDING L BUILDING G BUILDING K >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 8+00 9+00 10+00 11+00 9+57.18 7+21.73 8+75 >> 933.68 LP 934.17HP 0. 6 % 0. 6 % 0.6% 0.8 5 % 0. 8 5 % FFE 934.9 GFE 934.2 FFE 935.3 GFE 934.6 933.34TBC 3.9% 933.74TBC 2.0% 934.04TBC 2.0% 933.97TBC 2.5% 933.66SW 4.7% 934.25SW 2.0% FFE 935.4 GFE 934.7 FFE 936.2 GFE 935.5 934.43 SW 4. 9 % 935.02 SW 2. 2 % 935.8 935.0 935.0 934.8(TYP) 935.8 935.6(TYP) 934.8 934.8 932.5 932.35 934.50 934.50 934.50 934.50 934.90 934.90 934.90934.90 935.0 935.0 934.30(TYP) 934.70(TYP) 934.17TBC 933.84TBC 2.2% 933.85933.35 935.8 935.8 934.99 HWL(TYP) 4:1 (TYP) 4:1 (TYP) 934.40 934.40 934.15 934.80 934.80 934.9 934.8 934.55 934.9 935.7 935.7 933.5 EOF 93 1 93 2 93 0 92 8 92 6 92 4 92 9 92 7 92 5 93 3 934 933 932 931 932 931 931 932 933 935 934 933 932 932.5 92 2 92 3 935 934 93 4 93 4 9 3 4 9 3 4 934933 934 93 3 9 3 8 9 3 6 9 3 4 9 3 2 9 2 9 934 934 935 935 MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C-201 MA T C H L I N E SE E S H E E T C - 2 0 4 C4-B C-501 A1 GRADING PLAN - AREA 3 1" = 20' 6020 SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. R DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 C-203 GRADING PLAN AREA 3 LEGEND MAJOR EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR PROPOSED CONTOUR 930.00' ± MATCH MATCH EXISTING 930.00' HP HIGH POINT LOW POINT TOP OF CURB 930.00' LP 930.00' TBC 1086 1085 NOTES 1.SEE SHEET C-003 FOR GRADNIG AND DRAINAGE NOTES. 2.PROVIDE 2.0% SLOPE ON PATIOS. EXPOSE PATIO FOUNDATIONS TO A MAXIMUM 8" HEIGHT WHERE SLOPE CANNOT BE TIED OUT AT A MAXIMUM 4:1 SLOPE. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SIDEWALK930.00' SW EOF GENERATION AVENUE N >> B U I L D I N G N BUIL D I N G M BUILDING O 1+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 11+75 1+24.52 =14+36.45 > > 0+40 13+50 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> 934.10 933.77 0.6 % 0.6 % 934.09LP 934.61 935.14HP 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 0.6% 934.97SW2 . 4 % 934.55SW FFE 9 3 6 . 2 GFE 9 3 5 . 5 934.55SW 1.9% FFE 935.7 GFE 935.0 FFE 935.8 GFE 935.10 934.41 SW 2. 9 % 934.59 SW 2. 2 % 934.81 935.55935.05 935.8 935.8 935.6(TYP) 935.3 935.1(TYP)935.3 934.41 935.1 HP 935.8 935.31934.81 935.4 935.4 935.4 935.4 935.2(TYP) 933.84 934.28 934.6 935.5 934.4 934.9 934.75 934.99 934.95 934.69 > > EOF 935.4 935.2 935.1 935.3 935.3 935.7 935.7 935.25 932 935 934 934 931 932. 5 933 934 932 935 935 9 3 5 935 935 9 3 4 935.6 0.6 % 935 935 4 . 4 % 934 934 934 933 934 933 936 937 935 934 934 15 0 T H S T R E E T N SE E S H E E T C - 2 0 4 MA T C H L I N E MATCHLINE SEE SHEET C-202 A1 GRADING PLAN - AREA 4 1" = 20' 6020 SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. R DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 C-204 GRADING PLAN AREA 4 LEGEND MAJOR EXISTING CONTOUR MINOR EXISTING CONTOUR MAJOR PROPOSED CONTOUR MINOR PROPOSED CONTOUR 930.00' ± MATCH MATCH EXISTING 930.00' HP HIGH POINT LOW POINT TOP OF CURB 930.00' LP 930.00' TBC 1086 1085 NOTES 1.SEE SHEET C-003 FOR GRADNIG AND DRAINAGE NOTES. 2.PROVIDE 2.0% SLOPE ON PATIOS. EXPOSE PATIO FOUNDATIONS TO A MAXIMUM 8" HEIGHT WHERE SLOPE CANNOT BE TIED OUT AT A MAXIMUM 4:1 SLOPE. EMERGENCY OVERFLOW SIDEWALK930.00' SW EOF C-205 SWPPP DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 PROJECT NAME / LOCATION PROJECT NAME ONEKA LAKE RESERVE PROJECT ADDRESS GENERATION AVENUE N & 150TH STREET N PROPERTY ID 1703121440148 LATTITUDE/LONGITUDE 45.16798N, -92.98322W EROSION PREVENTION MEASURES - GENERAL The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for all erosion prevention measures for the project including but are not limited to the following: 1.The Contractor (Operator) shall plan and implement appropriate construction practice and construction phasing to minimize erosion and retain vegetation whenever possible 2.All areas not to be disturbed shall be delineated with flags, stakes, signs, or other means necessary to protect these areas before construction begins on the site. 3.All drainage ditches and/or swales shall have temporary or permanent stabilization within 24 hours of connecting to a surface water or 24 hours after construction activity in the ditch/swale has temporarily or permanently ceased. 4.All pipe outlets shall have temporary or permanent energy dissipation within 24 hours of connecting to a surface water. 5.All exposed soils shall be stabilized as soon as possible to limit soil erosion. In no case shall un-worked areas, including stockpiles, have exposed soils for more than 7 days without providing temporary or permanent stabilization. SEDIMENT CONTROL MEASURES AND TIMING - GENERALS The Operator (Contractor) is responsible for all sediment control measures for the project. Sediment control measures include but are not limited to the following: 1.Sediment control measures shall be established on all down gradient perimeters before any up-gradient land disturbing activities begin. These measures shall remain in place until final stabilization has been established. 2.On slopes with 3:1 or steeper grades there shall be no unbroken slope length greater than 75 feet. 3.All storm drain inlets and culvert inlets shall be protected by an appropriate BMP during construction until all sources with potential for discharging to the inlet has been stabilized. Inlet and culvert protection shall conform to the MnDOT Specifications 2573 and 3891. 4.Stockpiles shall be provided with an effective sediment perimeter control and shall not be placed in any type of surface water or drainageway. 5.Vehicle tracking shall be minimized with effective BMP's. Where the BMP's fail to prevent sediment from tracking onto streets the Contractor shall conduct street sweeping to remove all tracked sediment. 6.The Operator is responsible for identifying the need for temporary sediment basins based on actual field conditions to protect downstream resources. Temporary sediment basins shall be constructed before up gradient vegetation is disturbed and maintained until the risk of damage to downstream resources is mitigated by other means. DEWATERING AND BASIN DRAINING ACTIVITIES - GENERAL The Operator is responsible for adhering to all dewatering and surface drainage regulations, including but not limited to the following: 1.Whenever possible water from dewatering activities shall discharge to a temporary and/or permanent sediment basin. 2.If water cannot be discharged to a sedimentation basin, it shall be treated with other appropriate BMP's, to effectively remove sediment. 3.All discharge points shall be protected from erosion and scour. 4.Discharge water shall be dispersed over an effective energy dissipation measure. 5.All water from dewatering shall be discharged in a manner that does not cause nuisance conditions, erosion, or inundation of wetlands. Water shall not be discharged to adjacent residential properties. It must be discharged to the public street. FINAL STABILIZATION - GENERAL The Operator is responsible for ensuring final stabilization of the site, including but is not limited to the following: 1.All soil disturbing activities outside of the right-of-way have been completed. 2.All exposed soils have been uniformly stabilized. 3.All drainage ditches, ponds and all storm water conveyance systems have been cleared of sediment and stabilized to preclude erosion. Upon approval of the work by Owner and City, the responsibility for the site may be transferred to the City's Contractor and builders. The original Contractor will remain responsible for establishment of at least 80% perennial vegetation coverage and the removal of temporary BMP's. TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN The Contractor shall limit the amount of the site that is susceptible to erosion at any given time by phasing the work. Permanent Infiltration facilities can be used as temporary storage basins prior to installing sand and Infiltrationmedia. Do not excavate beyond design subgrade elevations. After temporary storge need is over, the permanent Infiltration facilities should be constructed according to plans. Sediment shall be properly removed from the basins prior to excavation to design subgrade elevations. Do not allow compaction of the soils and operation of heavy machinery in Infiltration areas. CONSTRUCTION SEQUENCING - GENERAL Contractor shall comply with the following sequence. The Contractor may adjust the sequence if needed to address their means and methods and unanticipated field conditions. 1.Install perimeter erosion and sediment control measures, tree protection fencing, and construction entrance. Erosion and sediment control BMPs shall be installed and maintained as specified in the general notes of this SWPPP and the Construction Details. 2.Proceed with demolition per C010. 3.Dredge to expand the existing stormwater basin as shown on the drawings. Stockpile dredged material to allow it to dry to a suitable store level for use as embankment within the project. 4.Strip and stockpile topsoil. Stabilize with temporary seed and mulch, and surround with an erosion control blanket. 5.Begin installation of utilities. 6.Begin building construction. 7.Pave street, sidewalks, and driveways. 8.Finish utility installation. As inlets are completed, establish inlet protection. 9.Finish buildings. 11.Flush storm sewer system, remove sediment from sumps. 12.Replace inlet protection that is full, replace any damaged sections of perimeter BMPs until final stabilization has been achieved. 13.Begin Final Stabilization. Install landscaping, sod, and seed. Monitor vegetation growth, replace dead vegetation as needed. When 90% of the vegetative cover has been established, remaining erosion and sediment control BMPs may be removed. 14.File NPDES Notice of Termination (“NOT”) with MPCA within 30 days of final stabilization. INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE All inspections, maintenance, repairs, replacements, and removal are to be considered incidental to the BMP bid items. The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for completing required inspections maintenance and observation of weather conditions and rainfall amounts to ensure compliance with the permit requirements. The Contractor (Operator) shall observe the construction site once every seven (7) days during active construction and within 24 hours after a rainfall event greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours. The Contractor (Operator) shall keep a summary maintenance/construction observation report to be recorded after each site visit/observation. The Contractor (Operator) shall submit a copy of the written inspections monthly to the Owner. Records shall include the following: 1.Date and time of inspections 2.Name of person conducting inspection 3.Findings and recommendations for corrective actions if necessary 4.Corrective actions taken 5.Date and number of rainfalls greater than 0.5 inches in 24 hours 6.Record, photograph, and describe the location of any observed discharge (i.e., color, odor, settled or suspended solids, oil sheen, and other obvious indicators of pollutants) 7.Photographs of dewatering activities and documentation of nuisance conditions resulting from dewatering activities 8.Record any amendments or changes made to the SWPPP 9.A site map indicating active construction areas and land disturbing activities. The Contractor (Operator) must keep the SWPPP, all inspection reports and amendments onsite. The Contractor (Operator) shall designate a specific location to keep the records whenever construction activity is in progress. All erosion prevention and sedimentation control BMP's must be inspected to ensure integrity and effectiveness. All nonfunctional BMP's must be repaired, replaced, or supplemented with functional BMP's. The Contractor (Operator) must investigate and comply with the following inspection and maintenance requirements: 1.All sediment barriers including silt fence, bio-logs, and similar devices must be repaired replaced or supplemented when they become nonfunctional, or the sediment reaches 1/3 of the barrier height. These repairs shall be made within 24 hours of discovery. 2.Temporary and permanent sediment basins must be drained, and the sediment removed when the depth of sediment collected in the basin reaches 1/2 the storage volume. Drainage and removal must be completed within 72 hours of discovery. 3.Surface waters, including drainage ditches and conveyance systems, must be inspected for evidence of erosion and sediment deposition. The Operator shall remove all deltas and sediment deposited in surface waters, including drainage ways, catch basins, and other drainage systems. The Operator shall re-stabilize the areas where sediment removal results in exposed soil. Removal and stabilization must take place within 7 days of discovery, unless precluded by legal, regulatory or physical constraints. The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for contacting all local, regional, state and federal authorities and receiving any applicable permits, prior to conducting any work. 4.Construction site vehicle exit locations shall be inspected daily for evidence of off-site sediment tracking onto paved surfaces. Tracked sediment must be removed from all paved surfaces within 24 hours of discovery. 5.The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for the operation and maintenance of temporary and permanent water quality BMP's. As well as erosion and sediment control BMP's for the duration of the construction work at the site. 6.If sediment escapes the construction site, all off-site accumulations of sediment must be removed in a manner and at a frequency sufficient to minimize off-site impacts. 7.All Infiltration areas must be inspected to ensure that no sediment from ongoing construction activities is reaching the Infiltration areas and these areas are protected from compaction due to construction equipment driving across the Infiltration area. 8.The Contractor is solely responsible for all costs associated with reconstructing the BMP when the functionality is compromised by the Contractor's actions or inaction to protect the BMP. POLLUTION PREVENTION MANAGEMENT MEASURES The Contractor (Operator) shall be responsible for all pollution prevention management measures. The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for informing all visitors and/or personnel on-site of the pollution prevention management measures. All pollution prevention management measures are to be considered incidental to the overall project bid, unless otherwise noted. Pollution prevention management measures include but are not limited to the following: 1.The Contractor (Operator) is responsible for the proper disposal, in compliance with MPCA disposal requirements, of all solid or liquid waste and hazardous materials on-site. 2.Concrete trucks shall not be allowed to wash out or discharge surplus concrete or drum wash water on-site, unless done in an engineered leak-proof containment system. The engineered system provided by the Contractor (Operator) must include site drawings for the project file and written assurance that the system will work as designed and leave no discharge of concrete or concrete residue potential to waters of the state during a minimum of a 100-year storm event. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout system to inform concrete equipment Operators to utilize the proper facilities. The concrete washout containment system and all related items shall be considered incidental to the project bid. 3.All nonhazardous waste materials shall be collected and stored in a securely lidded metal dumpster or other approved containment method at the end of each day. Any alternative to a metal dumpster must be submitted in writing for approval by the project engineer. The dumpster shall be emptied as necessary to function as intended for debris collection. No construction garbage or waste material shall be buried on-site. 4.A licensed sanitary waste management Contractor shall collect all sanitary waste from the portable units at a rate necessary to maintain designed function. 5.All fertilizers shall be stored in a covered shelter. Partially used bags shall be transferred to a sealable bin to reduce the chance of spillage. 6.External washing of trucks and other construction vehicles and engine degreasing are prohibited at the construction site. All vehicles on-site shall be monitored for leaks and receive regular prevention maintenance to reduce the chance of leakage. Petroleum products shall be stored in tightly sealed containers. Which are clearly labeled. Spill kits shall be included with all fueling sources and maintenance activities. Secondary containment measures shall be installed and maintained by the Operator. 7.Any asphalt substances used on-site shall be applied in accordance with manufacturer's recommendations. 8.All paint containers and curing compounds shall be tightly sealed and stored when not required for use. Excess paint and/or curing compounds shall not be discharged into the storm sewer system and shall be properly disposed of according to manufacturer's instruction. 9.Materials and equipment necessary for spill clean-up shall be kept in an enclosed trailer or shed on-site. Equipment shall include. But not limited to, brooms, mops, dust pans, rags, gloves, goggles, absorbent (kitty litter) oil absorbent booms and diapers and buckets. 10.All spills shall be contained and cleaned up immediately upon discovery. Spills large enough to reach the storm water conveyance system shall be reported to the Minnesota duty officer at 1-800-422-0798. CONTACTS OWNER DON WILLENBRING ONEKA LAKE, LLC 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 PHONE# (651) 363-3915 CONTRACTOR/OPERATOR TBD NAME/CONTACT COMPANY ADDRESS PHONE# EMAIL PREPARER KALLY HALUPTZOK ÉLAN DESIGN LAB, INC. 310 4TH AVE S SUITE 1006 MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55415 612-260-7979 KHALUPTZOK@ELANLAB.COM SWPPP DESIGN CERTIFICATION EXPIRES 2027 GENERAL SWPPP RESPONSIBILITIES The Contractor (Operator) shall provide a knowledgeable and experienced person(s) to oversee the implementation of the SWPPP and the installation. Inspection and maintenance of the erosion and sediment control BMP's before and during construction. The responsible individual shall maintain current Construction Installer and Construction Site Manager certification. Copies of current certification documents must remain on-site with the SWPPP. The Certified person must be available on-site within 24 hours. Both the Owner and Contractor (Operator) shall be responsible for the proper termination and/or transfer of the permit. The Owner will be responsible for the long-term operation and maintenance of the permanent storm water management system(s). Unless specifically stated the engineer shall have no responsibility for any SWPPP activities during or after construction. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The vacant 6.7 acre project site is located north of 150th Street North at Generation Avenue. The proposed development includes a 50 attached townhomes, in two, three, and four-unit buildings, served by a private street. Stormwater management is provided by a series of infiltration basins that overflow to an open water retention pond in the northeast corner of the site. SOILS The generalized soil mapping provided by the USDA/NRCS indicates that approximately 40% of the soils are Isanti fine sand loam, 40% are Lino loamy fine sand and 20% Lino variant fine sand. All of these soils types consist of, in varying degrees, loamy fine sand and fine sand. “B” hydrologic soil group (HSG) has been used for all calculations. The geotechnical investigation and report prepared by NTI that indicates the presence of a thin layer of topsoil over silty sand (SM), poorly graded sand with silt (SP-SM) and poorly graded sand (SP). Shallow groundwater will be encountered. RECEIVING WATERS The site directly drains to a regional NURP pond on the North side of the property. The project is within a mile proximity to Oneka and Egg Lakes, and Hardwood Creek. MAP OF SURFACE WATERS MAP OF MPCA IMPAIRED AND SPECIAL WATERS PROJECT PLANS The following plan sheets are hereby incorporated into this SWPPP DESCRIPTION DATE C200 SHEET NUMBER Overall Grading and Erosion and Sediment Control Plans C201, C202, C203, C204 Grading Plan Areas 1-4 C301 Utility Plan 04/20/2026 C501 - C505 Details 04/20/2026 04/20/2026 04/20/2026 STORMWATER RELATED REVIEWS AND PERMITS TYPE OF PERMIT REVIEW STATUS City of Hugo AGENCY Site Plan Review, Stormwater Management, Erosion and Pending Sediment Control, Grading Permit, Building Permit MPCA Construction Stormwater To be acquired by contractor STORMWATER MANAGEMENT SYSTEM OVERVIEW See Stormwater Management Plan incorporated herein by reference for details on system design, flow rates and volumes and system capacities. The existing NURP pond to the north will be expanded and will be the primary discharge point from the site. Stormwater will be utilized for irrigation within the development. See Operations and Maintenance Manual for post construction system maintenance requirements. QUANTITIES QUANTITY * SILT FENCE PRACTICE 2,085 DETAIL/SPEC.UNIT A1/C-503 LF POST CONSTRUCTION OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE Maintenance of the storm water management facilities will be the responsibility of an Owner and will be subject to an agreement with Minnehaha Creek Watershed District. Owner must make the SWPPP, including all inspection reports, maintenance records, training records and other information required by this permit, available to federal, state, and local officials within three (3) days upon request for the duration of the permit and for three (3) years following the NOT. AMENDMENTS TO THE SWPPP The SWPPP will be amended as needed and/or as required by provisions of the permit. Amendments will be approved by both the Owner and Contractor (Operator) and will be attached to the SWPPP as an additional sheet. The SWPPP and amendments will be kept on site by the Contractor (Operator) whenever construction activity is in progress. The SWPPP must be amended within 7 days to include additional or modified BMPs as necessary to correct problems identified or address situations whenever there is a change in design, construction, operation, maintenance, weather or seasonal conditions having a significant effect on the discharge of pollutants to surface waters or groundwater or whenever inspections or investigations by the site owner operator, USEPA or MPCA officials indicate the SWPPP is not effective in eliminating or significantly minimizing the discharge of pollutants to surface waters or groundwater or the discharges are causing water quality standard exceedances. *Quantities are minimums and are not intended to be used for purposes of bidding. The contractor shall provide ESC BMPs as shown on the drawings and shall repair, replace, and supplement BMPs throughout construction as required to comply with the SWPPP and the construction stormwater permit. Rice Creek Watershed District TURBIDITY CURTAIN 155C1/C-503 LF DITCH CHECK 7C6/C-503 EACH CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1A4/C-503 EACH INLET PROTECTION 17C3C-503 EACH TREE PROTECTION FENCE 440D1/C-503 LF RIPRAP SPILLWAY 3C1/C-505 EACH EROSION CONTROL BLANKET 33,660A2/C-503 SF 15 0 T H S T R E E T N GENERATION AVENUE N | | | 1 2 1 4 OUTLOT B (PARK) 5 3 11 12 13 5 1 9 8 7 6 6 71234 2 3 4 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 EXISTING STORMWATER BASIN OUTLET 930.2 HWL 931.2 COMMON SPACE 2 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2 OUTLOT A1234 BL O C K 2 BLOCK 3BLOCK 4 BLOCK 5 BLOCK 6 OUTLOT A > > > > > > EXPANDED STORMWATER BASIN FOREBAY >>>>>>>>>> 8 9 10 >> >> | | | | || || >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | ||| || || OUTLOT A OUTLOT A BLOCK 6 BLOCK 6 >> S2 CONNECT TOEX. 8" PVC STUBEX INV = 922.6' ± 9 4 ' - 8 " P V C @ 0 . 5 % 99' - 8" PVC@ 0.5% STA 9+21SAN MH 5RE 933.85IE 927.40 (E) 28 3 ' - 8 " P V C @ 0 . 5 % 189' - 8" PVC @ 0.5% 8" WATER 8" W A T E R 8 " W A T E R 8" WATER 6" WATER CB B1RE 932.78IE 929.38 W10 S2 CONNECT TO EXISTING 8"DIP WATER STUB W/ 8"GATE VALVE & 45d BEND 42' - 10" PVC@ 0.28% ST1 1 3 ' MI N S3 W12 W2 W1 CB A5RE 933.33IE 929.79 W3 W4 ST4 S4 W11 14' - 8" PVC @ 1.0% CB D3RE 933.60IE 930.85 144' - 15" H D P E @ 0 . 2 % CB D4RE 933.60IE 930.92 24' 12" PVC @0.28% W8 ST1 W3 W8 W5 STA 3+16.88SAN MH 2RE 933.35IE 924.34 (N)IE 924.24 (S) CBMH A3RE 932.48IE 929.40 73' - 15" RCP @ 0.4% ST2 FES B2IE 929.69 ST5 HW J2IE 930.20 STMH D1RE 933.80IE 930.18 ST3 HW G1IE 930.18 ST4 ST1 CB I1RE 933.59IE 930.63 CB F1RE 933.93IE 930.67 15 2 ' 1 5 " H D P E @ 0 . 2 % CB C1RE 932.99IE 929.61 24' - 10" PVC@ 0.28% STA 12+17.66SAN MH 6RE 934.84IE 924.15 (E)IE 925.25 (N) S1 166' - 8 " P V C @ 0 . 5 % 8" W A T E R W10 S1 C3 S2 W10 S2 W10 W10 W8 S4 W11 S3 W12 S3 W12 S3 W12 S3 W12 HW I2IE 930.82 STA 14+22.31SAN MH 5RE 934.48IE 923.20(N&W)IE 923.10(S) 9 4 ' - 8 " P V C @ 0 . 5 % STA 2+13.37SAN MH 2RE 934.03IE 923.77(N)IE 923.67 (S) S1 309' - 8" PVC @ 0.5% S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W4 W2 W1 W3 W10 S2 W4 W2 W1 W3S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 W8 STA 6+28.95SAN MH 4RE 933.21IE 925.99 (W)IE 925.89 (S) W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 W3 W8 CB A4RE 933.33IE 929.72ST1 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 S2 W10 W2 W1 ST1 FES DIE 930.14 ST5 CBMH D2RE 933.59IE 930.56 W6 C7 C10 C9 SAN MH 5RE 934.25IE 924.32 (W)IE 924.22 (E) S1 C6 W10 S2 W8 C5 W3 10. 5 ' 10.5' 1 0 . 5 ' 10. 5 ' W7 110 ' 1 0 " P V C @ 0 . 5 2 % W10 S2 W10 S2 HW G2IE 929.90 ST4 C8 CB C2RE 932.99IE 929.67 W10 S2 CB A2RE 932.69IE 929.30 CB A1RE 932.69IE 929.26 C1 C2 ST1 37' - 8 " P V C @ 2 . 7 6 % STA 10+25SAN MH 4RE 934.19IE 926.19(S) W7 W7 S2 W10 ST1 FES AIE 929.0 88' - 24" RCP @0.30% 24' - 24" HDPE@ 0.14% 84 ' - 1 8 " H D P E @ 0 . 1 2 % 19 0 ' - 1 5 " H D P E @ 0 . 1 7 % HW J1IE 930.42 22' - 8" PVC@1.0% ST4 28' - 8" PVC@ 1% W8 W4 24' - 10" PVC @0.28% 10.5' 10 . 5 ' 10.5 ' ST2 12.9' 155' - 12" PVC@ 0.22% ST 5 ST 6 18' - 18" RCP@0.55% ST 2 C11 C13 C12 3. 5 ' 4. 8 ' C4 W10 S2 13' MIN . W10 W8 S2 41' - 24" RCP @0.00% FES F2IE 927.0 FES F1IE 927.0 ST6 ST5 A1 UTILITY PLAN 1" = 30' 9030 SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. R DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 C-301 UTILITY PLAN KEY NOTES SANITARY SEWER WATER MAIN LEGEND STORM SEWER>> DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE WITH CURB STOP|| SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CATCH BASIN STORM OR SANITARY MANHOLE FLARED END SECTION GATE VALVE FIRE HYDRANT W1 W2 W5 FIRE HYDRANT 6" GATE VALVE 8" X 8" TEE W6 DEFLECT AT JOINTC4 C-504 C5 C-504 A1 C-504 S1 SANITARY MANHOLE A2 C-504 S2 NEW 4" PVC SERVICE A4 C-504 ST1 ST2 CATCH BASIN MANHOLE WITH SUMP A1 C-505 A2 C-505 ST3 STORM MANHOLE WITH SUMP A5 C-504 W3 8" GATE VALVE W4 8" X 6" TEE W7 8" - 22.5° BEND W8 8" - 45° BEND W10 NEW 1" SERVICE GROUP CONSISTING OF 1" CORP WITH SADDLE 1" COPPER (TYPE K) PIPE & 1" CURB STOP W/ BOX W11 EXISTING 1" SERVICE GROUP TO BE ABANDONED W12 EXISTING 1" SERVICE GROUP TO BE USED S3 EXISTING 4" PVC SERVICE TO BE USED S4 EXISTING 4" PVC SERVICE NOT USED CATCH BASIN MANHOLE ST4 ST5 CONCRETE HEADWALL WITH HAND PLACED RIP RAP ON DOWNSTREAM END A4 C-505 C2 C-505 W9 NOT USED CROSSINGS C1 BOTTOM STM 929.1 TOP WTR 925.5 C2 BOTTOM STM 929.1 TOP SAN 926.6 C3 BOTTOM STM 929.4 TOP WTR 925.8 C4 BOTTOM STM 929.6 TOP SAN 925.8 C5 BOTTOM WTR 926.2 TOP SAN 923.8 C6 BOTTOM STM 930.7 TOP SAN 923.4 CATCH BASIN WITH SUMP RCP FLARED END SECTION WITH RIP RAP ST6 PILING FOR STORM SEWER APRONS C7 BOTTOM STM 930.4 TOP WTR 927.0 C8 BOTTOM STM 930.4 TOP SAN 925.0 C9 BOTTOM STM 930.4 TOP SAN 925.1 C10 BOTTOM STM 930.4 TOP WTR 926.4 C11 BOTTOM STM 929.1 TOP WTR 926.0 C12 BOTTOM STM 929.1 TOP WTR 925.5 C13 BOTTOM STM 929.1 TOP WTR 925.7 HEADWALL C4 C-505 BU I L D I N G S E T B A C K PR O P E R T Y L I N E 25'1'6'8.2' - 8.4' VARIES SURMOUNTABLE CURB 1.67% LO T L I N E 10.5'BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SECTION PUBLIC CONCRETE WALK 150TH STREET VARIES 2% MINIMUM ELEV 0.70 ELEV 0.60 TBC ELEV 0.33 ELEV 0.00 0. 3 ' TO P S O I L GA R A G E W A L L GFE ELEV VARIES HOLD DOWN = GFE - 1.0' FFE = GFE + 0.7' 22' GA R A G E W A L L SURMOUNTABLE CURB 1% LO T L I N E 10.5'BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SECTION 25.34' B-B 12.67'12.67' 2.75%2.75% 6'5'22' CONCRETE WALK 10.5' LO T L I N E 0. 3 ' TO P S O I L VARIES 2% MINIMUM ELEV 0.00 ELEV - 0.33 ELEV 0.00 TBC ELEV 0.00 ELEV 0.10 ELEV 0.15 GA R A G E W A L L GFE ELEV VARIES HOLD DOWN = GFE - 1.0' 0. 3 ' TO P S O I L FFE = GFE + 0.7' BU I L D I N G W A L L PATIO AND STOOP FFE = GFE + 0.7' GFE ELEV VARIES HOLD DOWN = GFE - 1.0' FFE = GFE + 0.7' FFE - 0.5 FFE - 0.6 18' PARKING STALL VALLEY GUTTER - 0.33' 25.34' B-B 12.67'12.67' 2.75%2.75%VARIES 24' F-F 5' 2% CONCRETE WALK MINIMUM 6" TOPSOIL B618 CURB & GUTTER OR SURMOUNTABLE CURB CL B618 CURB & GUTTER ELEV - 0.33ELEV 0.00 TOP OF BACK OF CURB ELEV 0.00 SURMOUNTABLE ELEV 0.17 B618 CURB C-501 DETAILS DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 SIDEWALK PAVEMENT SECTIONC2 NO SCALE SEE PLAN FOR DIMENSION B618 CURB & GUTTER AND SURMOUNTABLE CURBC1 NO SCALE E4 NO SCALE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION 1.5" TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (2,C) SPWEA240C (PG 58-28), MNDOT 2360 12" APPROVED SUBGRADE 2.5" TYPE SP 12.5 BITUMINOUS NON-WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (2,C) SPWEB230C (PG58-28), MNDOT 2360 2357 BITUMINOUS TACK COAT 8" AGGREGATE BASE (CLASS 5 OR SALVAGED/RECYCLED MATERIAL MEETING CLASS 5 GRADATION) MNDOT 3138 E5 NO SCALE 3.0" TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE MIXTURE (2,B) SPWEA240B (PG 58-26), MNDOT 2360 COMPACTED SUBGRADE 6" AGGREGATE BASE (MNDOT 3138 CL5) 24" SELECT GRANULAR MATERIAL) MNDOT 3138.2B2 B3 1" = 5' TYPICAL CROSS SECTION AT 150TH STREET A1 1" = 5' TYPICAL CROSS SECTION B1 1" = 5' TYPICAL CROSS SECTION AT PARKING NOT USED NOT USED 6' PUBLIC 5' PRIVATE E6 CURB TRANSITION NO SCALE SE E P L A N 6" AT CURB AND GUTTER CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER MATCH GEOMETRY OF CURB AND GUTTER 8'-0" 6" SEE PLAN UNLESS OTH E R W I S E I N D I C A T E D D5 NO SCALE BOULDER RETAINING WALL AT RIP RAP C4 NO SCALE BOULDER RETAINING WALL STOOP 934.55 WALK LO T L I N E 12" - 18" BOULDER WALL 1 2 FILL GAP BETWEEN PAVEMENT AND BOULDER WITH GRAVEL MATCHED BOULDER MATERIAL 6" TOPSOILGRANULAR BACKFILL COMPACT SUBGRADE FINISHED GRADE EOF GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 932.55 6' GEOTEXTILE FABRIC 1 2 12" - 18" BOULDER AT 1:1 MAXIMUM SLOPE GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 1 1 4 1 1 1 4 1 RCP FLARED END SECTION TOP OF RIP RAP BELOW FES INVERT ELEVATION CLASS II RIP RAP GRANULAR BACKFILL BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PAVEMENT SECTION SECTION A-A SECTION B-B 12" - 18" BOULDER AT 1:1 MAXIMUM SLOPE GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 1 1 CLASS II RIP RAP TOP OF RIP RAP BELOW FES INVERT ELEVATION GRANULAR BACKFILL C-502 DETAILS C1 SIGNAGE NO SCALE C4 ACCESSIBILITY CURB RAMP NO SCALE DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 NOTE: CITY WILL PURCHASE SIGNS AND BILL OWNER FOR COST. CONTRACTOR IS TO COORDINATE INSTALLATION. B3 NO SCALE MAXIMUM SPACING 100'. ALSO USE WHEN ABUTTING BUILDINGS. SPACING:5' 6' WALK WALK - 5' C/C - 6' C/C 1/4"R 1/4"R JOINT SEALER NON-BITUMINOUS JOINT FILLEREXPANSION JOINTTOOLED CONTROL JOINT 3" C A P O R 4" S I D E W A L K 1/2" 1/ 2 " 3/8" 1/8"4" W A L K SE E N O T E 1 FO R 3 " C A P 1" FILLER SEALER SURFACE PAVEMENT JOINT 3/4" BACKER MATERIAL JOINT 3/4" D W MATERIAL BACKER D CONSTRUCTION JOINT JOINT SEALER W BACKER T D CONTRACTION JOINT MATERIAL CRACK INITIAL SAWCUT (1/8") JOINT BOTTOM OR INSERT W = WIDTH OF SEALANT RESERVOIR (1/2" (MIN), 5/8" (MAX)) D = DEPTH OF SEALANT (1.0 TO 1.5W) T = 1/4 SLAB THICKNESS BUTTED JOINT JOINT SEALER ISOLATION/EXPANSION JOINT NOTE: TOP OF SEALANT WILL BE 1/8" TO 1/4" BELOW TOP OF PAVEMENT SURFACE FOR EXTERIOR PAVEMENTS 1. JOINT SEALANT PAVEMENT SURFACE PAVEMENT SURFACE A3 NO SCALE SIDEWALK JOINTSURMOUNTABLE CURB & GUTTER AT CATCH BASINA1 NO SCALE A5 NO SCALE OVERFLOW WEIR STORMWATER FACILITY CLASS II RIP RAP TOE OF SLOPE SECTION B-B GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE IV UNDER RIP RAP DIRECTION OF FLOW TOP OF BANK TOE OF SLOPE STORMWATER FACILITY TOP OF BANK 12" SECTION A-A B B A A 11'4.5 EOF ELEVATION (0.05' +/-) 4.5 SLOPE DOWNSTREAM END TOWARDS CENTER TO CONTAIN FLOW CLASS II RIP RAP GEOTEXTILE FABRIC TYPE IV UNDER RIP RAP 4" MINIMUM TOPSOIL FULLY COMPACTED COHESIVE SOIL 4" MINIMUM TOPSOIL TOP OF BERM BEYOND C-503 DETAILS DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 C1 TURBIDITY CURTAIN NO SCALE CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 1 1/2" 10" FLOW FLOW FLOW FLOW EROSION CONTROL BLANKET A.BURY THE TOP END OF THE MATTING STRIPS IN A TRENCH 6 INCHES OR MORE IN DEPTH. B.TAMP THE TRENCH FULL OF SOIL. SECURE WITH ROW OF STAPLES, 10 INCH SPACING, 4 INCHES DOWN FROM THE TRENCH. C.OVERLAP - BURY UPPER END OF LOWER STRIP AS IN "A" AND "B". OVERLAP END OF TOP STRIP 18 INCHES AND STAPLE. D. EROSION STOP - FOLD OF MATTING BURIED IN SLIT TRENCH AND TAMPED DOUBLE ROW OF STAPLES. NOTES: 1.APPLY LIME, FERTILIZER AND SEED BEFORE LAYING THE NET OR MAT. 2.START LAYING THE NET FROM THE TOP OF THE CHANNEL OR SLOPE AND UNROLL IT DOWN THE GRADE. ALLOW NETTING TO LAY LOOSELY ON THE SOIL BUT WITHOUT WRINKLES - DO NOT STRETCH. MAT OR BLANKET - TYPE PRODUCT SHOULD PROVIDE AT LEAST 30% COVERAGE OF THE SURFACE WHERE IT IS APPLIED. 3.TO SECURE THE NET, BURY THE UPSLOPE END IN A SLOT OR TRENCH NO LESS THAN 6 INCHES DEEP, COVER WITH SOIL, AND TAMP FIRMLY AS SHOWN. STAPLE THE NET EVERY 12 INCHES ACROSS THE TOP END AND EVERY 3 FOOT AROUND THE EDGES AND BOTTOM. WHERE 2 STRIPS OF NET ARE LAID SIDE BY SIDE, THE ADJACENT EDGES SHOULD BE OVERLAPPED 3 INCHES AND STAPLED TOGETHER. EACH STRIP OF NETTING SHOULD ALSO BE STAPLED DOWN THE CENTER, EVERY 3 FOOT. DO NOT STRETCH THE NET WHEN APPLYING STAPLES. 4.TO JOIN TWO STRIPS, CUT A TRENCH AND ANCHOR THE END OF THE NEW NET. OVERLAP THE END OF THE PREVIOUS ROLL 18 INCHES, AS SHOWN, AND STAPLE EVERY 12 INCHES JUST BELOW THE ANCHOR SLOT. MAINTENANCE: INSPECT ALL MULCHES PERIODICALLY, AFTER RAINSTORMS TO CHECK FOR RILL EROSION, DISLOCATION, OR FAILURE. WHEN EROSION IS OBSERVED, APPLY ADDITIONAL MULCH. IF WASHOUT OCCURS, REPAIR THE SLOPE GRADE, RESEED, AND REINSTALL MULCH. CONTINUE INSPECTIONS UNTIL VEGETATION IS FIRMLY ESTABLISHED. TYPICAL STAPLES #8 GAUGE WIRE PRESS ENDS 6 INCHES INTO THE SOIL AROUND STRUCTURES AND STAPLE SECURELY WHEN USING NETTING IN CHANNELS, ROLL OUT STRIPS OF NETTING PARALLEL TO THE DIRECTION OF FLOW AND OVER THE PROTECTIVE MULCH. ALTERNATE - RUMBLE RACKS ALTERNATE - FODS MAT C3 SILT FENCE NO SCALE A1 NO SCALE A2 NO SCALE A4 NO SCALE TREE PROTECTION FENCE DRIPLINE 4-FT MIN 6-FT. HIGH TEMPORARY ORANGE CONSTRUCTION FENCE SHALL BE PLACED AT THE DRIPLINE OF THE TREE TO BE SAVED. FENCE SHALL COMPLETELY ENCIRCLE THE TREE(S). INSTALL FENCE POSTS USING PIER BLOCKS ONLY. AVOID DRIVING POSTS OR STAKES INTO MAJOR ROOTS. FOR ROOTS OVER 1-IN DIA. THAT ARE DAMAGED DURING CONSTRUCTION, MAKE A CLEAN, STRAIGHT CUT TO REMOVE THE DAMAGED PORTION. ALL EXPOSED ROOTS SHALL BE TEMPORARILY COVERED WITH DAMP BURLAP TO PREVENT DRYING, AND SHALL BE COVERED WITH SOIL AS SOON AS POSSIBLE. WORK WITHIN PROTECTION FENCE SHALL BE DONE MANUALLY. NO STOCKPILING OF MATERIALS, VEHICULAR TRAFFIC, OR STORAGE OF EQUIPMENT OR MACHINERY SHALL BE ALLOWED WITHIN THE LIMIT OF THE FENCING. BOTTOM WATER SURFACE ANCHOR CABLE CARRIER FLOAT STEEL TENSION CABLE VA R I A B L E D E P T H 12 " ANCHOR CURTAIN WEIGHT VARIABLE LENGTH CURTAIN FABRIC FLOATATION SILT CURTAIN STILL WATER TYPE AP P R O X . 2 0 ' STREAM, LAKE OR MARSH PLAN VIEW SIDE VIEW CURRENT D1 NO SCALE DITCH CHECKC6 NO SCALE POINT A POINT B SEDIMENT LOG SEDIMENT LOG WOOD STAKESFLOW PLAN 1.SEDIMENT LOG SHALL CONSIST OF STRAW OR FIBERS ENCASED IN AN OUTSIDE OPEN WEAVE CONTAINMENT FABRIC. 2.SEDIMENT LOG SHALL BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. 3.POINT A SHALL BE HIGHER THAN POINT B TO ENSURE THAT WATER FLOWS OVER THE CHECKS AND NOT AROUND THE ENDS. 1 TURF REINFORCEMENT MAT SEE 6/C-501 EROSION CONTROL BLANKET INSTALL ECB IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MANUFACTURER'S INSTRUCTIONS. NOTES: SECTION INLET PROTECTION ANCHOR POINT A C-504 DETAILS DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 HYDRANTC4 NO SCALE VALVE BOXC5 NO SCALE ENGINEERED FILL: SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR BACKFILL AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS ENGINEERED FILL: 1" MAX PARTICLE SIZE. SEE SPECIFICATIONS FOR BACKFILL AND COMPACTION REQUIREMENTS 6" MIN 12" MAX 12 " 6" LINE OF TRENCH BEDDING MATERIAL (SEE SPECS) SHAPE TRENCH TO MATCH BELL SECTIONS BEDDING MATERIAL (SEE SPECS) LINE OF BEDDING IN ROCK (8" SAND BASE IN ROCK FOUNDATION)4" TYP (8" @ ROCK EXCAVATION) 1 1 D1 PVC/HDPE PIPE BEDDING NO SCALE WATER SERVICESA1 NO SCALE SANITARY MANHOLEA2 NO SCALE SANITARY SERVICEA4 NO SCALE CATCHBASIN MANHOLE/ STORM MANHOLE WITH 3' SUMPA5NO SCALE C2 NO SCALE THRUST RESTRAINT USE R-1792-GG CASTING FOR STORM MANHOLE C-505 DETAILS DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 04/20/2026 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 A1 RECTANGULAR CATCH BASIN (RCB) NO SCALE 24"MAX.6"MAX. "L" SIZE OF PIPE BARS BOLTS "L" 4"12" TO 42"1"3/4" 6"48" TO 72"1-1/4"1"12" MIN. TIE THE LAST 6 JOINTS ON INLET AND OUTLET PIPES AND BED IN GRANULAR MATERIAL. ANY COVER LESS THAN 2' OVER TOP OF PIPE SHALL BE GRANULAR MATERIAL. USE 2 TIE BOLT FASTENERS PER JOINT INSTALLED AT 60 DEG FROM TOP OR BOTTOM OF PIPE. USE 5/8" TIE FOR PIPE SIZES 12" TO 27". USE 3/4" TIE FOR PIPE SIZES 30" TO 66". USE 1" TIE FOR PIPE SIZES OVER 72". NUTS AND WASHERS ARE NOT REQUIRED ON PIPE SIZE LESS THAN 24". TRASH GUARDS REQUIRED ON ALL PIPES. PLACE NONWOVEN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC UNDER CABLED CONCRETE AND EXTENDING 1' UNDER FES A2 CONCRETE HEADWALL NO SCALE PROVIDE 3 CLIPS TO FASTEN TRASH GUARD TO F.E.S. HOT DIP GALVANIZE AFTER FABRICATION. A4 RECTANGULAR CATCH BASIN (RCB) NO SCALEWITH SUMP C1 RIP RAP NO SCALE C2 RCP FLARED END SECTION NO SCALE PILING FOR STORM SEWER APRONSC4 NO SCALE PERENNIAL PLANTING (TYP) TREE GUARDS (TYP) DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING (TYP) SHRUB PLANTING (TYP) A1 L-501 SOD AT HARDSCAPE (TYP) EXISTING TREES EXISTING TREES CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING (TYP) EDGING AT PLANTING BED (TYP) D1 L-501 D3 L-501 E3 L-501 B3 L-501 B1 L-501 C3 L-501 EXISTING TREES PARK PARK IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS SNOW STORAGE EXISTING STORM BASIN EXPANDED STORMWATER BASIN FOREBAY 15 0 T H S T R E E T N GENERATION AVENUE N 1 LANDSCAPE PLAN 1" = 30' 9030 SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. R DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Pilarsinee Saraithong REGISTRATION NO.XX/XX/2020 DATE 45059 ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 L-101 LANDSCAPE PLAN REQUIRED PROPOSED VALUE MIN. 1% COST OF IMPROVEMENTS RESIDENTIAL & PARK IMPROVEMENTS ABOVE 1% 1 OVERSTORY DECIDUOUS TREE / UNIT 50 50 - 2.5" DECIDUOUS TREES + SAVED 2 EXISTING TREES + 13 ADDITIONAL POND SCREENING + 12 ADDITIONAL OUTLOT TREES 1 CONIFEROUS TREE/ UNIT 50 50 - 6' HT CONIFEROUS TREES + SAVED 21 EXISTING TREES + 43 ADDITIONAL WEST PROPERTY SCREENING TREES 1 ORNAMENTAL TREE / 1,000 SF OF BUILDING (57,600/1,000)58 58 - 1.5" ORNAMENTAL TREES OR 1 ORNAMENTAL TREE/ 100 LF SITE PERIMETER (2,207/100)22 1 SHRUB/ 200 SF OF BUILDING (57,600/200)288 448 SHRUBS 1 SHRUB/ 30 LF SITE PERIMETER (2,207/30) 74 LANDSCAPE SUMMARY LEGEND SOD EXISTING TREE TO REMAIN TURF SEEDED SEE SHEET C-200 FOR SEEDING NOTES STORMWATER SEEDING SEE SHEET C-200 FOR SEEDING NOTES TALL GRASS SEEDING SEE SHEET C-200 FOR SEEDING NOTES L-501 LANDSCAPE DETAILS DRW25001 PROJECT NO. PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, AND REZONING REVIEW 04/20/26 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION REVISION DATE ISSUE PROJECT D E S I G N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G | L A N D S C A P E A R C H I T E C T U R E 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Landscape Architect under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Pilarsinee Saraithong REGISTRATION NO.XX/XX/2020 DATE 45059 ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE, LLC DON WILLENBRING 2120 WUTHERING HEIGHTS ROAD EAGAN, MN 55122 651-363-3915 D1 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING NO SCALE TREE WRAP TO FIRST BRANCH MOUND SUBGRADE SCARIFY BOTTOM PRIOR TO PLANTING CUT AND REMOVE TOP 1/3 BURLAP (MIN.), WIRE BASKET, AND ALL NYLON CORD 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP PLANTING PIT 2-3 X DIA. OF SOIL BALL DUG & TILLED PIT 3-5 X DIA. OF SOIL BALL MULCH DISH MULCH, EDGING, & DISH RING (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) ROOT FLARE AT FINISHED GRADE OR FIRST MAJOR BRANCHING ROOT AT 1 INCH BELOW SOIL LINE DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE & 3 STEEL STAKES AT 120 DEGREE INTERVALS NOTES MAINTAIN TREE IN PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD (SEE SPECIFICATIONS). TREE STAKING AND ITS METHOD ARE OPTIONAL TO CONTRACTORS. TWO ALTERNATIVES ARE SHOWN. ONE FLAG PER WIRE COMPACT PLANTING SOIL PLANTING SOIL (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) MULCH (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) EDGING (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) PLANTING SOIL (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM PRIOR TO PLANTING MULCH (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) SET TOP OF ROOT 1" ABOVE GRADE MAKE SAUCER AROUND PLANTS EDGING (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) SEE PLAN AND PLANT SCHEDULE FOR SPACING 12" MIN. 6" M I N . PROVIDE PLANTING BED 12" MIN. AROUND PLANTS HOLD SODDED AREA 1" BELOW PAVING SURFACE PLANTING SOIL WATER & TAMP TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS REMOVE ALL POT AND ALL PLASTIC LOOSEN ROOTS PRIOR TO PLANTING E3 SHRUB PLANTING NO SCALE C3 EDGING AT PLANTING BED NO SCALE D3 PERENNIAL PLANTING NO SCALE B3 SOD AT HARDSCAPE EDGE NO SCALE 8' STEEL STAKE INSTALL ON THE SIDE OF PREVAILING WIND B1 CONIFEROUS TREE PLANTING NO SCALE SCARIFY SIDES OF PIT PRIOR TO PLANTING MOUND SUBGRADE SCARIFY BOTTOM PRIOR TO PLANTING CUT AND REMOVE TOP 1/3 BURLAP (MIN.), WIRE BASKET, AND ALL NYLON CORD 16" POLYPROPYLENE OR POLYETHYLENE, 40 MIL, 1-1/2" WIDE STRAP PLANTING PIT 2-3 X DIA. OF SOIL BALL DUG & TILLED PIT 3-5 X DIA. OF SOIL BALL MULCH DISH MULCH, EDGING, & DISH RING (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) ROOT FLARE AT FINISHED GRADE OR FIRST MAJOR BRANCHING ROOT AT 1 INCH BELOW SOIL LINE DOUBLE STRAND 14 GA. WIRE & 3 STEEL STAKES AT 120 DEGREE INTERVALS NOTES MAINTAIN TREE IN PLUMB POSITION THROUGHOUT THE WARRANTY PERIOD (SEE SPECIFICATIONS). TREE STAKING AND ITS METHOD ARE OPTIONAL TO CONTRACTORS. TWO ALTERNATIVES ARE SHOWN. ONE FLAG PER WIRE COMPACT PLANTING SOIL PLANTING SOIL WATER & TAMP TO REMOVE AIR POCKETS 8' STEEL STAKE INSTALL ON THE SIDE OF PREVAILING WIND SCARIFY SIDES OF PIT PRIOR TO PLANTING LOOSEN ROOTS PRIOR TO PLANTING 18 " M I N . SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM PRIOR TO PLANTING 12" MIN. PROVIDE PLANTING BED 12" MIN. AROUND PLANTS MAKE SAUCER AROUND PLANTS TOPSOIL (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) PLANTING SOIL (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) MULCH (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) EDGING (SEE LANDSCAPE NOTES) TOP OF EDGING TO BE MAXIMUM 1/2" ABOVE SURFACE MATERIAL 12" MIN. PROVIDE PLANTING BED 12" MIN. AROUND PLANTS INSTALL STAKES PER MANUFACTURER'S INSTALLATION GUILDLINES TOP OF MULCH 2" BELOW TOP OF PAVEMENT 24" MIN. TO PAVEMENT UV INHIBITOR-TREATED WHITE EXTERIOR WITH BLACK INNER SURFACE A1 TREE GUARDS NO SCALE 3" MIN.- 8" DIAMETER 2-PLY CORRUGATED HDPE GUARDS 36 " M I N . OR T O F I R S T B R A N C H SET BOTTOM FIRMLY IN SOIL LANDSCAPE NOTES 1.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR IS RESPONSIBLE FOR FINISHED GRADING AND POSITIVE SURFACE DRAINAGE IN ALL LANDSCAPE AREAS. LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR MUST ENSURE THAT THE FINAL GRADES ARE MET AS SHOWN ON GRADING PLAN. IF ANY DISCREPANCIES ARE FOUND, IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR RESOLUTION. 2.ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO CONFORM WITH STATE & LOCAL CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS AND THE CURRENT ADDITION OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF NURSERYMEN STANDARDS. ALL PLANT MATERIALS ARE TO BE HEALTHY, HARDY STOCK, AND FREE FROM ANY DISEASES, DAMAGE, AND DISFIGURATION. 3.QUANTITIES OF PLANTS LISTED ON THE PLAN ARE TO GOVERN ANY DISCREPANCY BETWEEN THE QUANTITIES SHOWN ON THE PLANT SCHEDULE AND PLAN. PLACE PLANTS IN PROPER SPACING FOLLOWING LAYOUT FIGURES. 4.TOPSOIL TO BE MNDOT 3877.2B LOAM TOPSOIL BORROW FOR LANDSCAPED AREAS AND PLANTING BEDS. PROVIDE ROOTING TOPSOIL BORROW MNDOT 3877.2E FOR PLANT RESTORATION, WATER QUALITY, AND FILTRATION PLANTING. 5.SPREAD PLANTING SOIL AT MINIMUM EIGHTEEN (18) INCH DEEP IN ALL PLANTING BEDS PRIOR TO PLANTING. THOROUGHLY WATER TWICE TO FACILITATE CONSOLIDATION PRIOR TO PLANTING. DO NOT OVERLY COMPACT SOIL. PLANTING SOIL TO HAVE A PH BETWEEN 6.5-7.5, BE FREE OF CHEMICAL CONTAMINANTS, DEBRIS, LARGE ROCKS GREATER THAN 1/ 2" DIAMETER, AND FRAGMENTS OF WOOD. SUBSOIL SHALL BE SCARIFIED TO A DEPTH OF 4" BEFORE PLANTING SOIL IS SPREAD. 6.MULCH TO BE SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH (MNDOT 3882 TYPE 6), CONSISTED OF RAW WOOD MATERIAL FROM TIMBER AND BE A PRODUCT OF A MECHANICAL CHIPPER, HAMMER MILL, OR TUB GRINDER. THE MATERIAL SHALL BE SUBSTANTIALLY FREE OF MOLD, DIRT, SAWDUST, AND FOREIGN MATERIAL AND SHALL NOT BE IN AN ADVANCED STATE OF DECOMPOSITION. THE MATERIAL SHALL NOT CONTAIN CHIPPED UP MANUFACTURED BOARDS OR CHEMICALLY TREATED WOOD, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, WATER BOARD, PARTICLE BOARD, AND CHROMATED COPPER ARSENATE (CCA) OR PENTA TREATED WOOD. THE MATERIAL SHALL BE TWICE-GROUND/ SHREDDED, SUCH THAT; NO INDIVIDUAL PIECE SHALL EXCEED 2 INCHES IN ANY DIMENSION. 7.APPLY FOUR (4) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN FOUR (4) FOOT DIAMETER RING AROUND ALL TREES. 8.EDGE ALL SHRUB BEDS WITH 3/16" X 4" MILL FINISHED ALUMINUM EDGING WITH STAKES. ALL EDGING TO BE COMMERCIAL GRADE. 9.APPLY THREE (3) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN ALL SHRUB AREAS AND APPLY TWO (2) INCH DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD BARK MULCH IN PERENNIAL AREAS. PRIOR TO MULCHING, APPLY PRE-EMERGENT HERBICIDE TO ALL PLANTING BEDS. 10.APPLY FOUR (3) INCH DEPTH OF 1 - 1 1/2 INCH DARK GRAY TRAP ROCK MULCH OVER GEOTEXTILE FABRIC IN ALL MAINTENANCE STRIPS. 11.APPLY PRE-EMERGENT TO MULCH IN PLANTING AREAS TO PROHIBIT WEED GROWTH. APPLICATION RATE TO BE PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. IF WEEDS APPEAR IN TREATED AREAS DURING THE FIRST YEAR, LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TO REMOVE ALL WEEDS AT NO ADDITIONAL COST. 12.ALL TREES ADJACENT TO VEHICULAR AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION SHALL HAVE LOWER BRANCH AT 6 FEET MINIMUM ABOVE PAVEMENT. 13.THE ENTIRE LANDSCAPE AREAS SHALL BE IRRIGATED WITH AN UNDERGROUND IRRIGATION SYSTEM. NO WATER IS ALLOWED ON ANY PAVEMENT, PARKING, WALKWAY, AND BUILDING. THE IRRIGATION CONTRACTOR IS TO DESIGN AND SUBMIT SHOP DRAWING OF IRRIGATION DESIGN AND CALCULATIONS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR REVIEW 5 DAYS PRIOR TO PURCHASING AND INSTALLATION. IRRIGATION DESIGN IS TO MEET ALL CITY AND STATE PLUMBING CODES AND REQUIREMENTS. 14.FOLLOW LANDSCAPE DETAILS FOR ALL INSTALLATION, UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 15.LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN PLANTS IN HEALTHY CONDITION THROUGHOUT WARRANTY PERIOD. THE WARRANTY PERIOD IS TWO FULL YEARS FROM DATE OF PROVISIONAL ACCEPTANCE UNTIL FINAL ACCEPTANCE. WARRANTY PERIOD FOR PLANT MATERIAL INSTALLED AFTER JUNE 1ST SHALL COMMENCE THE FOLLOWING YEAR. PLANT SCHEDULE SUBSTITUTIONS: IF ANY SUBSTITUTIONS ARE REQUIRED, SUBMIT WRITTEN DOCUMENTS AND PROPOSED SUBSTITUTIONS TO LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL 5 DAYS PRIOR TO PURCHASE AND/OR INSTALLATION. NO MORE THAN 1/3 OF PROPOSED TREES CAN BE THE SAME SPECIES. 6'H X 5'WHYDRANGEA PANICULATA 'SMNHPPH' LIMELIGHT HYDRANGEA ACER X FREEMANII 'BAILSTON' MATADOR MAPLE B&B 50'H X 25'WTILIA AMERICANA 'BOULEVARD' 2.5" CAL.BOULEVARD LINDEN QUANT.KEY COMMON NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME SIZE ROOT COND. DECIDUOUS TREES EVERGREEN TREES MATURE SIZE SHRUBS 6' HT.B&B 60'H X 25'WPINUS STROBUSEASTERN WHITE PINE 3 GAL.2'H X 2'WPOTBERERIS THUNBERGII 'NCBT1' SUNJOY MINI MAROON BARBERRY 6' HT.B&B 50'H X 20'WPINUS SYLVESTRISAUSTRIAN PINE B&B 50'H X 40'WQUERCUS BICOLOR 2.5" CAL.SWAMP WHITE OAK PERENNIALS NEPETA FAASSENII 'WALKER'S LOW' WALKER'S LOW CATMINT HEMEROCALLIS 'RUBY STELLA' RUBY STELLA DAYLILY CALAMAGROSTIS ACUTIFLORA 'KARL FOERSTER' KARL FOERSTER FEATHER REED GRASS 3'H X 2'W1 GAL POT 2'H X2'W1 GAL POT 1.5'H X 1.5'W1 GAL POT HOSTA 'STAINED GLASS' STAINED GLASS HOSTA 1.5'H X 3'W1 GAL POT B&B 40'H X 20'WGLEDITSIA TRICANTHOS VAR INERMIS 'DRAVES' 2.5" CAL.STREET KEEPER HONEYLOCUST 352 12 ORNAMENTAL TREES 1.5" CAL.B&B 20'H X 15'WMALUS 'PRAIRIEFIRE' PRAIRIEFIRE FLOWERING CRAB 11 320 6' HT.B&B 30'H X 8'WPICEA ABIES 'CURPRESSINA' CUPRESSINA NORWAY SPRUCE 10 B&B 45'H X 25'W2.5" CAL. B&B 25'H X 25'WSYRINGA RETICULATAJAPANESE TREE LILAC 13 15 AMELANCHIER X GRANDIFLORA 'AUTUMN BRILLIANCE' AUTUMN BRILLIANCE SERVICEBERRY B&B 25'H X 20'W 1.5" CAL. PRUNUS MAACKIIAMUR CHOKECHERRY B&B 20'H X 20'W 6' CLUMP B&B 40'H X 20'WGINKGO BILOBA 'PNI2420' 2.5" CAL.PRINCETON SENTRY GINKGO 60 30 24 11 12 12 POT5 GAL. 3 GAL.3'H X 3'WPOTSPIRAEA JAPONICA 'NEON FLASH' NEON FLASH SPIREA TEXAS X MEDIA 'TAUNTONII' TAUNTON SPREADING YEW 4'H X 4'WPOT5 GAL. 12 15 15 12 9 6' HT.B&B 30'H X 15'WTHUJA OCCIDENTALISWHITE CEDAR18 1.75" CAL.B&B 30'H X 20'WPOPULUS TREMULOIDESQUAKING ASPEN 12'H X 8'WSYRINGA VULGARISCOMMON PURPLE LILAC POT7 GAL.14 1.5" CAL.B&B 20'H X 15'WCRATAEGUS CRUS-GALLI INERMIS THORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN 12 6' HT.B&B 45'H X 20'WPICEA GLAUCA 'DENSATA' 12 6' HT.B&B 40'H X 20'WABIES CONCOLORCONCOLOR FIR 33 1.5" CAL. 133 251 80 BLACK HILLS SPRUCE A2 1" = 30' LANDSCAPE FOUNDATION PLANTING - 4 UNIT 4 UNIT PLANTING 3 UNIT PLANTING 2 UNIT PLANTING | | | > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> >> | | | | || || >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> | | | | | | | | | | | | || | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | || || || > > | | | > > > > > > >>>>>>>>>> >> >> | | | | || || >>>>>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> | | | | | | | | | | | | || | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | || || || > > Re-Use Pump 10 1012 12 15 12 12 12 12 15 12 12 15 12 1515 15 12 12 1515 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 12 12 1515 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 10 10 10 12 15 15 15 15 15 1212 12 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 12 12 12 12 12 15 15 15 12 12 15 12 12 15 1.5 1.5 2.5 2.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.52.5 2.52.5 15 15 15 15 8 8 15 15 15 12S S 12 10 S S S 15 15 12 12 10 15 1512 12 12 15 15 12 12 8 8888 1515 15 12 1515 15 12 888888 12 12 15 10 15 1515 15 12 15 1515 1010101015 15151515151515 15 12 12 15 15 15 15 15 12 15 15 1515 12 10 10 12 12 12 15 15 12 12 15 15 15 15 15 12 R L R S R L R L L R S 15 15 15 12 15 15 1515 15 15 10 10 12 12 12 15 15 12 12 10 1010 12 10 1010 12 10 15 15 15 15 15 1515 15 10 10 10 10 15 15 15 15 15 1515 12 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 12 12 S S S L S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S S 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 12 12 12 12 12 15 15 15 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 15 1515 12 1515 15 15 15 1515 15 10 10 1010 15 1515 15 15 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 1212 12 12 15 10 10 10 15 15 15 12 10 15 15 15 12 17 17 17 15 15 15 12 12 12 10 10 17 17 17 15 R L S S L R R S S 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 12 12 12 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 12 12 12 S S 12 12 12 12 12 1515 15 12 1515 15 12 RL L RSS 15 15 15 151515 15 15 15 15 15 12 RL S S S S 1515 15 15 12 12 12 15 12 12 12 12 12 12 12 15 10 12 12 12 1515 15 15 15 12 15 15 L 15 15 15 15 15 15 R S S L R 15 15 15 12 15 15 15 10 12 15 15 15 15 15 12 S 1212 15 15 15 12 12 15 15 15 15 1515 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 12 12 15 1515 15 15 15 15 10 15 15 15 15 15 R L S S R L L R S S S S 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 R L R L R S L S S S S S L R S 12 12 15 10 15 10 151515 15 1515 15 15 15 15 12 R L 10 10 10 10 10 10 1515 1515 15 15 15 15 10 10 10 1010 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 12 12 15 12 12 12 S S 1515 15 15 S 10 10 10 10 10 15 15 15 12 fs mv 114" 114" 1" 1" 1" 1" 1"114" 114"112"112"2" 1" 114" 1" 112" 1" 1" 114" 1" 114" 112" 112" 1" 114" 114"1" 112" 1" 1" 114" 114"1" 112" 1" 1" 1" 114" 114" 112" 1" 1" 114" 114" 1" 1" 114" 112" 112" 1" 114" 112" 1" 114" 114" 1" 1" 1"114"1" 1" 1" 1" 114" 1" 1" 1" 1" 112" 1" 1" 112" 1" 112" 1" 1" 114" 114" 1" C dm td rs 2" 2" 212"3" 212"112" 1" 1"114"1" 114" 2" 212" 1" 1" 114" 114" 3" 1" 1" 112" 1" 1" 1" 114" 1" 1" 1" 1" 114" 1"114" 212" 112" 1"1" 112" 1"114" 1" 1" 2"2" 2" 2" 2" 2" 2"2"2" 2" 2" 2"2" 2" 2" 2"2" 2" 4" 2" 2" 2" 2" 2" 2" 2" 2" 2" 2" 2" 4"2" 2" 2" 2" 2"2" 2"2" 2" 2"2" 2" 2" 2" 2" 2" 2" 4" 4" 2" 2" 2" 2" 2" 1" 1" 114" 114" 1" 1" 112"1" 114" 1" 1" 114" 1" 1" 114" 1"1" 1" 1"114" 1"1" 114" 114" 114" 2" 1" 112" 112" 114" 114" 1" 114" 112" 3" 114" 1" 1" 1" 114" 1" 114" 1" 1" 1"1" 114" 1"1" 114" 3" 3" 2 30.2112" 112" 3 20.2112" 1 31.5112" 5 24.7112" 6 30.7112" 7 22.5112" 8 33.2112" 9 34.5112" 10 23.7112" 11 19.7112" 12 23.6112" 13 16.1112" 14 19.5112" 15 17.5112" 16 20.2112" 17 30.6112" 18 23.0112" 19 28.5112" 20 24.4112" 21 31.8112" 22 31.2112" 23 21.3112" 24 16.3112" 1" 1" 114" 25 21.8112" 26 30.7112" 27 16.91"28 15.31" 29 9.81" 30 16.11" 31 22.1112" 32 9.81" 33 19.31" 34 25.7112" 35 33.0112" 36 19.9112" 37 31.5112" 114" 112"1"6" 6" PAGE: DA T E : DR A W N B Y : DE S I G N B Y : DE S I G N # : SCALE: OF Ou t d o o r L i g h t i n g Ir r i g a t i o n D o c t o r I n c Wa t e r F o u n t a i n s & A e r a t i o n In s t a l l a t i o n & S e r v i c e De s i g n & C o n s u l t i n g Re - U s e & W e l l W a t e r S y s t e m s Se r v i n g A r c h i t e c t s , E n g i n e e r s , D e v e l o p e r s , B u i l d e r s & H o m e o w n e r s 76 3 - 5 7 1 - 7 5 5 5 ir r i g a t i o n d e s i g n s c o m 4- 1 3 - 2 0 2 6 RH ID I DW - O L R - 0 1 1 2 1"=30' Hu g o , M N On e k a L a k e R e s e r v e SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY PSI Hunter PROS-04 Strip Series Turf Spray, 4in. Pop-Up. Co-molded wiper seal with UV Resistant Material. 106 30 Hunter PROS-04 8 Series Turf Spray, 4in. Pop-Up. Co-molded wiper seal with UV Resistant Material. 13 30 Hunter PROS-04 10 Series Turf Spray, 4in. Pop-Up. Co-molded wiper seal with UV Resistant Material. 58 30 Hunter PROS-04 12 Series Turf Spray, 4in. Pop-Up. Co-molded wiper seal with UV Resistant Material. 144 30 Hunter PROS-04 15 Series Turf Spray, 4in. Pop-Up. Co-molded wiper seal with UV Resistant Material. 311 30 Hunter PROS-04 17 Series Turf Spray, 4in. Pop-Up. Co-molded wiper seal with UV Resistant Material. 6 30 Hunter MP Strip PROS-04-PRS40-CV Turf Rotator, 4in. pop-up with factory installed check valve, pressure regulated to 40 psi, MP Rotator nozzle on PRS40 body. LCS=Ivory left strip, SS=Brown side strip, RCS=Copper right strip. 22 40 Hunter MP1000 PROS-04-PRS40-CV Turf Rotator, 4in. pop-up with check valve, pressure regulated to 40 psi, MP Rotator nozzle on PRS40 body. M=Maroon adj arc 90 to 210, L=Light Blue 210 to 270 arc, O=Olive 360 arc. 16 40 Hunter MP2000 PROS-04-PRS40-CV Turf Rotator, 4in. pop-up with factory installed check valve, pressure regulated to 40 psi, MP Rotator nozzle on PRS40 body. K=Black adj arc 90-210, G=Green adj arc 210-270, R=Red 360 arc. 20 40 Hunter MP3000 PROS-04-PRS40-CV Turf Rotator, 4in. pop-up with factory installed check valve, pressure regulated to 40 psi, MP Rotator nozzle on PRS40 body. B=Blue adj arc 90-210, Y=Yellow adj arc 210-270, A=Gray 360 arc. 11 40 SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY PSI GPM RADIUS Hunter PGP-04 1.5 Turf Rotor, 4in. Pop-Up. Adjustable to Full Circle. 6 35 1.4 29' Hunter PGP-04 2.5 Turf Rotor, 4in. Pop-Up. Adjustable to Full Circle. 5 35 2.1 33' SYMBOL MANUFACTURER/MODEL/DESCRIPTION QTY Hunter PGV-100-MB 1" Plastic Electric Remote Control Valve, for Residential/Light Commercial Use. Male Thread x Barb Inlet/Outlet. Globe Configuration, No Flow Control. 6 Hunter PGV-151 Angle 1-1/2" 1-1/2in. Plastic Electric Remote Control Valve, for Residential/Light Commercial Use. Female NPT Inlet/Outlet, With Flow Control. Angle Configuration. 30 Hunter HQ-5RC 1" Quick coupler valve, yellow rubber cover, red brass and stainless steel, with 1in. NPT inlet, 1-piece body. 5 Landscape Products Inc. BGV 1/2in., 3/4in., 1in., 1-1/4in., 1-1/2in., 2in., 2-1/2in., 3in., 4in. Brass Gate Valve. Threaded bonnet, Non-rising stem, Pressure rated to 200 psi. Same size as mainline. 4 Hunter ICV-G-R 2" 1in., 1-1/2in., 2in., and 3in. Plastic Electric Master Valve, Globe Configuration, with NPT Threaded Inlet/Outlet, for Commercial/Municipal Use. With Reclaimed Water ID, Purple Handle. 1 Hunter I2C-0800-PL 8 Station Outdoor Modular Controller. No Module Required. Commercial Use. Plastic Cabinet. 1 Hunter EZ-1 Single Station EZ Decoder for use with EZDM Decoder Module Only. To be installed on Universal Decoder Stake Kit (DECSTAKE10). 1 Hunter EZDM EZDM decoder output module. Plug-in module converts any ICC2 controller to 2-wire decoder system (up to 54 stations maximum). To be installed on Universal Decoder Stake Kit (DECSTAKE10). 1 Hunter WRF-CLIK Rain/freeze Sensor, install within 1000 ft of controller, in line of sight. 22-28 VAC/VDC 100 mA power from timer transformer. Mount as noted. Includes Gutter Mount. 1 Flomec QS200-20 2" 2in. insertion flowmeter, schedule 80 PVC housing. .92 GPM-138 GPM range, max. operating pressure 150 psi. 2-wire connector w/ LED indicators for power and pulse. Storage temps -20 F to +160 F. 1 Re-Use Pump Station 1 Irrigation Lateral Line: Polyethylene Pipe SDR-7 15.7 lf Irrigation Lateral Line: Polyethylene Pipe SDR-7 1"8,372 lf Irrigation Lateral Line: Polyethylene Pipe SDR-7 1 1/4"1,046 lf Irrigation Lateral Line: Polyethylene Pipe SDR-7 1 1/2"357.2 lf Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Class 160 SDR 26 1 1/2"95.3 lf Irrigation Lateral Line: PVC Class 160 SDR 26 2"55.9 lf Irrigation Mainline: PVC Class 200 SDR 21 1 1/2"83.7 lf Irrigation Mainline: PVC Class 200 SDR 21 2"67.9 lf Irrigation Mainline: PVC Class 200 SDR 21 2 1/2"887.0 lf Irrigation Mainline: PVC Class 200 SDR 21 3"1,102 lf Pipe Sleeve: PVC Class 160 SDR 26 40.5 lf Pipe Sleeve: PVC Class 160 SDR 26 2"505.9 lf Pipe Sleeve: PVC Class 160 SDR 26 4"66.9 lf ES CS SSRCSLCS E L R C S FHTQ 8 8 8 8 Q T H F 10 10 10 10 Q T H F 12 12 12 12 Q T H F 15 15 15 15 HQ 17 17 LCS RCSSS 1000 2000 3000 1.5 2.5 mv C td dm rs fs Re-Use Pump Valve Number Valve Flow Valve Callout # ##" IRRIGATION SCHEDULE 0 feet60 1" = 30' 30 90 120 NO R T H NUMBER MODEL TYPE PRECIP SUN MON TUE WED THU FRI SAT IN./WEEK MIN./WEEK GAL./WEEK GAL./DAY 1 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.29 in/h 16 min 16 min 16 min 1 47 1,418 473 2 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 0.81 in/h 25 min 25 min 25 min 1 74 1,493 498 3 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.3 in/h 16 min 16 min 16 min 1 47 1,481 494 4 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 0.92 in/h 22 min 22 min 22 min 1 66 1,628 543 5 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 0.98 in/h 21 min 21 min 21 min 1 62 1,900 633 6 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.03 in/h 20 min 20 min 20 min 1 59 1,329 443 7 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.7 in/h 12 min 12 min 12 min 1 36 1,193 398 8 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.21 in/h 17 min 17 min 17 min 1 50 1,726 575 9 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.1 in/h 19 min 19 min 19 min 1 55 1,304 435 10 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 0.9 in/h 23 min 23 min 23 min 1 67 1,321 440 11 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.27 in/h 16 min 16 min 16 min 1 48 1,131 377 12 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.42 in/h 15 min 15 min 15 min 1 43 692 231 13 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 0.98 in/h 21 min 21 min 21 min 1 62 1,207 402 14 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.02 in/h 20 min 20 min 20 min 1 59 1,034 345 15 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.11 in/h 18 min 18 min 18 min 1 54 1,092 364 16 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.21 in/h 17 min 17 min 17 min 1 50 1,528 509 17 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Rotary 0.37 in/h 55 min 55 min 55 min 1 163 3,744 1,248 18 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.29 in/h 16 min 16 min 16 min 1 47 1,340 447 19 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.27 in/h 16 min 16 min 16 min 1 48 1,170 390 20 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.02 in/h 20 min 20 min 20 min 1 60 1,907 636 21 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.04 in/h 20 min 20 min 20 min 1 58 1,807 602 22 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.18 in/h 17 min 17 min 17 min 1 51 1,086 362 23 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 0.92 in/h 22 min 22 min 22 min 1 65 1,060 353 24 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 0.95 in/h 22 min 22 min 22 min 1 64 1,398 466 25 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.12 in/h 18 min 18 min 18 min 1 54 1,656 552 26 Hunter PGV-100-MB Turf Spray 0.82 in/h 25 min 25 min 25 min 1 73 1,231 410 27 Hunter PGV-100-MB Turf Spray 1.15 in/h 18 min 18 min 18 min 1 52 793 264 28 Hunter PGV-100-MB Turf Rotor 0.75 in/h 27 min 27 min 27 min 1 80 784 261 29 Hunter PGV-100-MB Turf Spray 0.91 in/h 23 min 23 min 23 min 1 67 1,081 360 30 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.22 in/h 17 min 17 min 17 min 1 50 1,106 369 31 Hunter PGV-100-MB Turf Rotor 0.74 in/h 28 min 28 min 28 min 1 82 804 268 32 Hunter PGV-100-MB Turf Spray 1.01 in/h 20 min 20 min 20 min 1 60 1,158 386 33 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 0.98 in/h 21 min 21 min 21 min 1 62 1,595 532 34 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.21 in/h 17 min 17 min 17 min 1 50 1,652 551 35 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Rotary 0.36 in/h 56 min 56 min 56 min 1 167 3,330 1,110 36 Hunter PGV-151 Angle Turf Spray 1.31 in/h 16 min 16 min 16 min 1 46 1,449 483 TOTALS:606 166 606 166 606 166 2,278 51,626 17,209 WATERING SCHEDULE Generated:2026-04-14 14:28 P.O.C. NUMBER: 01 Water Source Information: FLOW AVAILABLE Custom Max Flow:120 GPM Flow Available 120 GPM PRESSURE AVAILABLE Static Pressure at POC:70 PSI Pressure Available:70 PSI DESIGN ANALYSIS Maximum Multi-valve Flow:120 GPM Flow Available at POC:120 GPM Residual Flow Available:0 GPM Critical Station:18 Design Pressure:40 PSI Friction Loss:4.18 PSI Fittings Loss:0.42 PSI Elevation Loss:0 PSI Loss through Valve:3 PSI Pressure Req. at Critical Station:47.6 PSI Loss for Fittings:0.71 PSI Loss for Main Line:7.06 PSI Loss for POC to Valve Elevation:0 PSI Loss for Backflow:0 PSI Loss for Master Valve:6.5 PSI Critical Station Pressure at POC:61.9 PSI Pressure Available:70 PSI Residual Pressure Available:8.14 PSI CRITICAL ANALYSIS PAGE: DA T E : DR A W N B Y : DE S I G N B Y : DE S I G N # : SCALE: OF Ou t d o o r L i g h t i n g Ir r i g a t i o n D o c t o r I n c Wa t e r F o u n t a i n s & A e r a t i o n In s t a l l a t i o n & S e r v i c e De s i g n & C o n s u l t i n g Re - U s e & W e l l W a t e r S y s t e m s Se r v i n g A r c h i t e c t s , E n g i n e e r s , D e v e l o p e r s , B u i l d e r s & H o m e o w n e r s 76 3 - 5 7 1 - 7 5 5 5 ir r i g a t i o n d e s i g n s c o m 4- 1 3 - 2 0 2 6 RH ID I DW - O L R - 0 1 2 2 nts Hu g o , M N On e k a L a k e R e s e r v e PS TYPICAL SUBMERSIBLE PUMP STATION 150 GPM Pump and Motor, Can be Custom Made or Ordered from your Vendor FINISH GRADE MODEL PROS-04-CV SPRAY HEAD HUNTER SWING JOINT MODEL SJ-5XX-X LATERAL TEE OR ELBOW LATERAL PIPE PROS SPARY POP-UP SERIES WITH BOTTOM INLET 3" = 1'-0"1 P-CO-TES-HOLT-05 PGV ANGLE VALVE 1" = 1'-0" 18-24" COILED WIRE WATERPROOF CONNECTORS (2) REMOTE CONTROL VALVE MODEL PGV-XXXA WITH ACCU-SYNC-ADJ FINISH GRADE STANDARD VALVE BOX SCH 80 T.O.E. NIPPLE (2) BRICK SUPPORTS (4) 3/4" MINUS WASHED GRAVEL MAIN LINE PIPE & FITTINGS PVC SLIP UNION 2 P-CO-TES-HOLT-06 WALL MOUNT CONTROLLER 1" = 1'-0" 60 " S E E C A L L O U T # 1 18 " 1 2 3 4 5 7 SET CONTROLLER 60" ABOVE FINISHED GRADE UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED 1 CONTROLLER AS SPECIFIED, SECURELY BOLTING CONTROLLER TO WALL OR AS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS. INSTALL BACKUP BATTERIES AS REQUIRED. GROUND AS PER MANUFACTURER SPECIFICATIONS 2 1/2" DIAMETER RIGID STEEL CONDUIT FOR 110VAC ELECTRICAL SOURCE. INSTALL AS PER LOCAL ELECTRICAL CODES 3 1-1/2" DIAMETER RIGID STEEL CONDUIT FOR RCV WIRES 4 FINISHED GRADE5 LONG SWEEP ELL6 USE PVC SCH. 40 BELOW GRADE7 6 3 P-CO-TES-HOLT-08 IRRIGATION TRENCHING 1 1/2" = 1'-0" 1 2 NOTES: 1.SEE IRRIGATION LEGEND FOR MAINLINE AND LATERAL LINE PIPE SIZE AND TYPE. 2.DIRECT BURIAL CONTROL WIRES SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SCH. 40 PVC ELECTRICAL CONDUIT IF REQUIRED. 3.2-WIRE IRRIGATION WIRE SHALL BE INSTALLED IN SCH. 40 PVC ELECTRICAL CONDUIT. 4.DETECTABLE LOCATOR TAPE SHALL BE LOCATED SIX INCHES (6") ABOVE THE ENTIRE MAINLINE RUN. 24" MIN. 6" 1' - 0 " I N P L A N T I N G A R E A FINISHED GRADE1 PAVEMENT2 NON-PRESSURIZED LINE (LATERAL LINE) 3 DETECTABLE LOCATOR TAPE4 PRESSURIZED LINE (MAINLINE)5 DIRECT BURIAL LOW VOLTAGE CONTROL WIRES 6 3 4 5 6 1' - 6 " I N P L A N T I N G A R E A 3' 0 " U N D E R N E A T H P A V E M E N T 4 FX-IRRG-FX-AUXEQ-08 THRUST BLOCKING 3/4" = 1'-0" PLAN VIEWS SECTION VIEWS 45 DEG. ELBOW TEE 90 DEG. ELBOW END OF LINE CAPPED LINE 1 UTILITY BOX 1 1 2 2 POURED IN-PLACE CONCRETE, 120 LBS. MINIMUM, TYPICAL1 FINISHED GRADE2 5 P-CO-TES-HOLT-09 PGP POP-UP SERIES ROTOR 3" = 1'-0" FINISH GRADE MODEL PGP ROTOR HEAD HUNTER SWING JOINT MODEL SJ-7XXX LATERAL TEE OR ELL LATERAL PIPE 6 P-CO-TES-HOLT-21 15 0 T H S T R E E T N GENERATION AVENUE N 25 ' S E T B A C K 25' REAR BUILDING SETBACK X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX 25 ' S E T B A C K 15' SIDE BUILDING SETBACK 46 3587 643 1 5 2 PARK 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 1 9 8 OUTLOT C OUTLOT B BUILDING R 7 8 9 1 2 1 2 3 4 10 11 BLOCK 1 BLOCK 2 BLOCK 3 OUTLOT A BLOCK 1 ONEKA LAKE RESERVE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE 2ND ADDITION OUTLOT A 25' REAR BUILDING SETBACK 15' SIDE BUILDING SETBACK BLOCK 4BUILDING O BUILDING P BUILDING Q BUILDING B BUILDING N BUILDING J BUILDING I BUILDING H BUILDING M BUILDING L BUILDING K BU I L D I N G G BUILDING F BUILDING E BUILDING D BUILDING C BUILDING A BLOCK 2 C1 C-502 CONCRETE SIDEWALK (TYP) ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (TYP) 25' 25 ' 25' 22 ' TY P 8' TY P INSTALL 6' WOOD PRIVACY FENCE ON PROPERTY LINE 22' 8' 20' 5. 6 7 ' 5' 6' CONCRETE WALK 5' CONCRETE WALK 5' CONCRETE WALK 18' TYP 18 ' TY P TYP TYP T Y P STOP SIGN 25' 4.32' C4 C-501 TYPICAL STREET SECTION (TYP) BITUMINOUS DRIVE PAVEMENT SECTION (TYP) B1 C-501 A1 C-501 ACCESSIBILITY CURB RAMP (TYP) 6' 1' C2 C-501 EXISTING TREESEXISTING TREES 1' 6'9' 8.9' 13 . 5 ' CONCRETE PATIO (TYP) CONCRETE PATIO (TYP) 22 ' CONCRETE PATIO (TYP) CONCRETE PATIO (TYP) 3' CONCRETE WAK (TYP) CONCRETE PATIO (TYP) CURB TRANSITION (TYP) C1 C-501 11.2' B618 CURB & GUTTER (TYP) E1 C-501 SIDEWALK JOINT (TYP) A5 C-501 BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SECTION (TYP) A2 C-501 DRIVEWAY DROP (TYP) E2 C-501 DRIVEWAY (TYP) C5 C-501 6' CONCRETE WALK 3' CONCRETE WALK (TYP) 1 1 1 20 ' 5.67' 12' 18 ' 3 34.5' 20.1' 40.95' 25 ' 20' 20 ' 20 ' 15 . 8 ' 20' 20 ' 20' 27.7' 27.7' 24' F-F TY P 24 ' 5' 8. 6 7 ' 32 . 8 ' 24 ' F - F 8.7' R 3 3 ' R57' 8' 10' 26 ' 18 . 1 ' 10 7 . 1 ' 8' 18' 3 3 3 R88' R15' R 1 5 ' R1 1 2 ' R8 8 ' R25' R25' 25 . 1 ' 25 . 3 ' 25' 21. 7 ' 8' 24' 4.15' 20' 11.1 ' 2 2 ' 8.67' 5' 22'4.33' 8' 23 . 5 ' 8. 7 ' 5' 4. 3 ' 9. 2 ' 20' 20' R 8 8 ' R 1 0 2 ' R3 3 'R57 ' R4 8 ' R72' R1 1 2 ' R8 8 ' 21.1' 2.8' 22' 2. 7 6 ' 22 ' 8' 22 . 8 7 ' 14 . 6 2 ' TYP3 22' 8' 2 2 ' 5 ' 8 . 6 7 ' 2 4 ' F - F 8 ' 27' 23.1' 21.1 4 ' 3 24 ' 8' 15 . 5 ' 23 . 5 ' 27 . 9 ' 2 R1 1 2 ' 31 ' 2 0 ' 15 ' 8' 22 ' TY P 1 TY P TYP SUGGESTED PARK IMPROVEMENTS TO BE CONSTRUCTED BY OTHERS 20 ' 30 ' 22 . 1 ' 5' 8. 6 7 ' TY P PHASE I TEMPORARY CUL-DE-SAC R10.2 5 ' R2.2 5 ' R 2 . 2 5 ' 19 ' 19' END OF 6' WOOD PRIVACY FENCE A1 C-003 3 UNIT BUILDING (TYP) B1 C-003 2 UNIT BUILDING (TYP) BITUMINOUS TRAIL POND 6' BENCH ON CONCRETE PAD (TYP) ACCESSIBLE CURB RAMP (TYP) TYP 1 TYP 5' 5' 5' 5' CURB MODIFICATION AT CATCH BASIN (TYP) C4 C-502 B612 CURB & GUTTER (TYP) D1 C-501 E2 C-501 DRIVEWAY DROP (TYP) 5' CURB TRANSITION FROM B612 TO B618 5' CURB TRANSITION FROM B612 TO B618 A1 SITE PLAN 1" = 30' 9030 SCALE IN FEET Know what's below. Call before you dig. R LEGEND CONCRETE SIDEWALK OR PAVEMENT SCH18002 PROJECT NO. NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N SHEET CERTIFICATION ISSUE DATE SHEET INDEX PROJECT D E S I G N CIVIL ENGINEERING | LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE 3 1 0 4 T H A V E S O U T H , S U I T E 1 0 0 6 M I N N E A P O L I S , M N 5 5 4 1 5 www.elanlab.comp 612.260.7980 f 612.260.7990 1 2 3 4 5 6 E D C B A I hereby certify that this plan, specification or report was prepared by me, or under my direct supervision, and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. Stephen M. Johnston 18914 03/12/2021 NOT FO R CONST R U C T I O N REGISTRATION NO. DATE ONEKA LAKE RESERVE HUGO, MN ONEKA LAKE RESERVE, LLC. 12928 JODY AVE. N HUGO, MN 55038 651-303-0471 PRELIMINARY PLAT, SITE PLAN, VACATION AND REZONING REVIEW 03/12/2021 PROJECT SUMMARY C-101 SITE PLAN SITE AREA 291,941 SF. (6.70 AC.) PARK 19,684 SF. (0.45 AC.) NET AREA 272,257 SF. (6.25 AC.) OUTLOT A 38,668 SF. (0.89 AC.) OUTLOT A 2ND ADDITON 34,515 SF. (0.79 AC.) OUTLOT B 2ND ADDITON 22,370 SF. (0.51 AC.) OUTLOT C 2ND ADDITON 11,215 SF. (0.26 AC.) LOTS 164,489 SF. (3.78 AC) BUILDINGS 71,768 SF. (26% NET OF PARK) WALK/ PARKING/ DRIVE/ STREET 77,764 SF. (29% NET OF PARK) TOTAL IMPERVIOUS 149,532 SF. (55% NET OF PARK) PERVIOUS 122,725 SF. (45% NET OF PARK) SHARED PRIVATE OPEN SPACE (OUTLOT B & C) 33,585 SF. (0.77 AC.) 12.3% OF SITE NET OF PARK TOTAL 40 UNITS 4 - 3 UNIT BUILDINGS = 12 14 - 2 UNIT BUILDINGS = 28 GROSS DENSITY 6.0 UNITS/ AC. NET DENSITY 6.4 UNITS/ AC. NET OF PARK REQUIRED PARKING 2 STALLS/ UNIT PLUS 1 STALL/ 5 UNITS 88 STALLS PROPOSED PARKING 180 STALLS 80 GARAGE PARKING STALLS 80 GUEST PRIVATE PARKING STALLS 20 - 8'X22' SHARED GUEST PARKING STALLS 1PERVIOUS AREA PARKING STALL COUNT3 2' CURB TAPER FROM 6" TO 1" 2021 APPROVED PROJECT Agenda Number D.2 CITY OF HUGO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT PLANNING AND ZONING APPLICATION STAFF REPORT TO: Hugo Planning Commission FROM: Kendra Lindahl, Landform SUBJECT: Public Hearing. Repeal and Replace Chapter 90 (Zoning and Land Use) AND Accept the Multi-Family Design Guidelines DATE: June 16, 2026 for the Planning Commission Meeting of June 25, 2026 ZONING: N/A REVIEW DEADLINE: N/A 1. DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST: City Staff have been working with Landform to provide a repeal and replace of the Zoning and Land Use Ordinance (Chapter 90) in its entirety and update the Official Zoning Map in preparation of the 2050 Comprehensive Plan process. The revisions modernize the allowed uses and development standards, update statutory references, eliminate inconsistencies, update zoning districts, and update the zoning map. This update also includes the City of Hugo’s Multi-Family Design Guidelines. The guidelines were updated to clarify where they apply and provide clearer guidance on building scale and massing, architectural style, landscaping, open space requirements, parking, and sustainability features in a clear and user-friendly manner, ensuring ease of implementation for developers and clarity for City staff. 2. CONTEXT: In 2024, Staff contracted with Landform Professional Services, LLC to complete an update to the residential zoning district rules and regulations and update the Multi-Family Design Guidelines. Following the award of a Livable Communities Grant from the Metropolitan Council, the project expanded to include the entirety of Chapter 90 (Zoning and Land Use). Staff held two joint sessions with the Planning Commission and City Council as well as a developer roundtable. Page 2 Major updates to Chapter 90 are discussed in detail below, but the overall changes include: - Updating reference to State Statutes and regulations, - Re-alphabetizing the code section and performance standards, - Modernizing language and uses, - Cleaning up and establishing consistent language, word choice, and formatting, - Removing redundancies and conflicts, and - Adding uses, rules, and definitions that were missing. Overall, the proposed code changes will help set a baseline for the 2050 Comprehensive Plan update that is expected to start soon. As discussed in the joint sessions previously the major changes are discussed in the following order: a) Zoning District b) Zoning Map c) Uses d) Performance Standard e) Multi-Family Design Guidelines a) Zoning Districts Every zoning district in the City of Hugo was evaluated to determine if it was accomplishing the goals it set out within its dimensional standards and the uses that were allowed. Names were also updated to provide clarity on the differences between the zoning districts as found in the table below: BEFORE AFTER LA Long-term agricultural district (NO CHANGE) AG Agricultural district (NO CHANGE) RR Rural residential district (NO CHANGE) R-1 Large lot single-family residential district (NO CHANGE) R-3 Single-family detached residential district R-2 Low-density residential district CR-3 Central residential district R-3 Single- and two-family residential district R-4 Low-density multi-family residential district R-4 Medium-density multi-family residential district R-5 Medium-density multi-family residential district R-5 High-density multi-family residential district NS Neighborhood Services REMOVED C-1 Central business district (NO CHANGE) C-2 General business district (NO CHANGE) RC-1 Restricted commercial district (NO CHANGE) RI-1 Restricted industrial district (NO CHANGE) I-3 General Industrial district I-1 General Industrial district BP Business Park district (NO CHANGE) FUS/FCB Future Urban Service and Future Central Business District (NO CHANGE) None M-U Mixed Use Page 3 The most significant changes include the addition of the Mixed Use (M-U) district, removal of the Neighborhood Services (NS) district, and the renaming of the higher density residential districts. Other name changes were to renumber and reorder districts for clarity. The Mixed Use (M-U) zoning district is added to provide an alternative to a PUD in areas that are specifically guided Mixed Use in the Comprehensive Plan. While the areas may still develop as a PUD, the new standards establish a baseline for development. Finally, all zones had updates to their uses and dimensional standards including but not limited to the following: - Addition of “Interim Uses” specific to each district. - Removal of minimum lot depth because the lot with and lot size provides adequate standards. - Maximum building height was raised to 45 feet for Multi-family uses in the higher- density residential zones. - Removal of minimum building sizes in residential districts to reduce redundant or unnecessary restrictions that may hurt housing affordability. - Reordering of uses and districts for clarity and consistency - Reduction in minimum lot widths, lot sizes, and setbacks in some residential districts. R-4 and R-5 previously did not specify standards by housing type and now do. These changes are shown in the below: ZONING DISTRICT LOT SIZE MINIMUM LOT WIDTH MINIMUM FRONT SETBACK REAR SETBACK SIDE SETBACK R-3 Single-family detached residential district R-2 Low-density residential district 10,400 sq. ft. 10,000 sq. ft. 80 ft. 65 ft. 30 ft. 30 ft. 10 ft. CR-3 Central residential district R-3 Single- and two-family residential district SF: 8,400 sq. ft. TF: 15,000 sq. ft. SF: 7,500 sq. ft. TF: 14,000 sq. ft. SF: 80 ft. SF: 60 ft. TF: 100 ft. 25 ft. 25 ft. 10 ft. 7.5 ft. R-4 Low-density Medium- density multi-family residential district 1 Acre SF: 7,500 sq. ft. TF: 12,000 sq. ft. MF: 1 Acre 150 ft. SF: 55 ft. TF: 85 ft. MF: 150 ft. 25 ft. 20 ft. 25 ft. 15 ft. 7.5 ft. MF: 15 ft. R-5 Medium High-density multi-family residential district 1 Acre SF: 7,500 sq. ft. TF: 12,000 sq. ft. MF: 1 Acre 150 ft. SF: 55 ft. TF: 85 ft. MF: 150 ft. 25 ft. 20 ft. 25 ft. 15 ft. 7.5 ft. MF: 15 ft. Page 4 b) Zoning Map Updates to the zoning map are minor, as many of the changes to specific zoning districts and properties do not change their zoning classification. The parcels in the existing R-3 district will be zoned R-2, a district that did not exist in the previous version of the zoning code and which will have the standards of the existing R-3 district. The CR-3 district was renamed to R-3 and all parcels in the current CR-3 will become R-3. These changes will reduce lot non-conformities in the existing CR-3 zone to the new R-3 by almost 90%. The Neighborhood Services (NS) district was eliminated. The 10 parcels in this district are proposed to be rezoned to either C-1 or C-2 as follows: - PIDs #2003121330004, #2003121330006, and #2003121330071 are reclassified as Central Business (C-1). - PIDs #2903121220004, #2903121220012, #2903121220021, #2903121220010, #2903121220011, #3103121410010, and #3103121410002 are reclassified as General Business (C-2). The remaining changes made to the Zoning Map are updates to naming of the zoning districts. While names have changed, the color for most parcels does not change. Only the parcels being rezoned form Neighborhood Services to different commercial zones will change color and appearance on the Zoning Map. The Zoning Map is adopted as part of Chapter 90 and the Ordinance to repeal and replace Chapter 90 would also repeal and replace the Zoning Map. c) Uses The existing Chapter 90 contains 164 separate and distinct uses, many of which are only different due to spelling, word choice, or commas. Many of the uses are also redundant as they are either hyper-specific or outdated. Where possible, uses were consolidated to create broad categories. For example, rather than listing video stores as an individual land use, we have created a retail land use that would cover a variety of retail uses, including video stores. The broader categories will allow the City to better respond to a changing marketplace. Non-Residential Uses Broad categories created include the following: - Commercial recreation, indoor or outdoor - Drive-throughs - Exterior Storage - Personal and professional services, including banks, offices and clinics - Personal health and beauty services - Public, educational, or religious facilities - Restaurants - Retail sales of merchandise Liquor and alcohol related uses were also updated to reflect similar and nearby cities and to provide clarity for people looking to build in the City of Hugo. These include adding uses such as breweries, wineries, distilleries, and assorted related accessory uses. Page 5 Residential Uses As updating the Multi-Family Design Guidelines was part of this overall effort, staff was intentional when reviewing existing residential uses and the distinction between them in Hugo. The following graphic shows the different residential uses and how they would be classified in the City Code. Definitions have been updated to provide clarity and also emphasize items of importance for the City of Hugo when promoting certain housing types across the City. These are summarized in the table below: CURRENT PROPOSED PROPOSED DEFINITION Single Family detached residential dwellings Dwelling, Single-family detached residential means a building designed for and occupied exclusively by one (1) family. Twin Homes (duplexes) Dwelling, Two-family means a building designed for occupancy by two (2) families in separate dwelling units. Apartments, Apartments/Condominiums Dwelling, Apartment means a building designed with three (3) or more dwelling units exclusively for occupancy by three (3) or more families living independently of each other, but sharing hallways and main entrances and exits Multifamily Residential, not to exceed 12 units Combined above Accessory apartment Dwelling Unit, Accessory apartment (NO CHANGE) Accessory Dwelling Unit Dwelling unit, Accessory (NO CHANGE) Townhouses (Single-family attached) Dwelling, Townhouses means a single structure consisting of at least three attached dwelling units, each unit having its own direct exterior entrance at or near the ground level with no sharing of a common hallway for entry. Farmhand living quarters (NO CHANGE) (NO CHANGE) Page 6 Many of the changes provide clarity and a more encompassing definition to help prevent unspecified or unknown uses from creating issues in the near future. All uses were reviewed again to ensure clear definitions and clear performance standards if requiring a conditional or interim use permit. Finally, updates were made specifically to items that are required by the Municipal Planning Act regarding Daycares and Residential Facilities. These changes include updated definitions and clearly allowing them in certain zoning districts as required. This may be as a principal or accessory uses with or without a conditional use permit. d) Performance Standards With the consolidation of uses and change to zones, many of the performance standards in the code for specific uses needed updating. This includes re-alphabetizing the standards within their section numbers and updating names to match uses in the zones. Landscaping was updated to better reflect today’s standards for species list and types of planting, and outdated references, codes, and language was updated. Rather than a limited list of preferred landscape materials, we have added a list of prohibited trees and shrubs. These are invasive or non-native species, have disliked qualities (e.g., smelly and messy seed pods, prolific seeds, robust thorns, etc.) or are vulnerable to pests or other environmental conditions. Specific performance standards were established for each conditional or interim use and those standards will be evaluated by the City during the review processes. The changes to the Code appear significant due to the amount of text moving around and new section numbers, however, many sections of text remained largely unchanged. A repeal and replace provided the cleanest way to adopt the proposed code changes to Chapter 90. e) Multi-Family Design Guidelines The current Multi-Family Design Guidelines were adopted in December 2005 and have been used by Staff when developers in Hugo have proposed different types of multi-family housing. This update is to modernize language, examples, images, and to provide additional clarity for what types of multi-family housing are preferred in Hugo. Guidelines are not adopted as part of the City Code and therefore do not have the same level of authority or regulation. However, the City does choose to use these to communicate preferences for development. Additional requirements found in the guidelines are encouraged to be incorporated into development proposals, but the City and the developer have flexibility with the guidelines that do not exist when applying the City Code. The City should accept these guidelines so that all who use them are clear on what they should and should not propose for a multi-family housing development. Page 7 Building Types The most significant change to the guidelines content is the creation of definitions of three building types for multi-family housing. With the proposed changes for the new Chapter 90 (Zoning and Land Use), multi-family housing includes any building with three or more attached units (townhouses and apartments). In order to understand the preferences of the City and of developers building in Hugo, the project team held a Joint Planning Commission and City Council Session and a Developer Open House to go over proposed updates to the guidelines. During these meetings, preferences became clear and pointed to a desire for multi-family development at a smaller scale than what is usually assumed. This led to distinctions based on size rather than the type of housing. While reviewing multi-family housing developments that have been promised or built in the recent years in Hugo, a clear pattern started to develop. This led to the following classification of building types, all of which are found and defined as the following in the proposed Multi-Family Design Guidelines: SMALL Small buildings are defined as having eight or fewer units per building. These may be either townhouse or apartment buildings and tend to fit the scale of traditional single-family homes developments well as a buffer between higher density or incompatible uses. MEDIUM Medium buildings are defined as having nine to eighteen units per building. These may be either type of multi-family housing and are more compatible as standalone housing developments or as a buffer between traditional single-family housing a high density or commercial uses. Medium buildings that are townhouses are allowed to exceed the maximum of eight units per building if they utilized stacked units but maintain the same design features of a townhouse. This means private exterior entrances on the ground floor, private attached garages, and no common shared areas for access. LARGE Large buildings are defined as having nineteen or more units per building. This would only include apartments not townhouses and is the more common apartment style multi-family housing found in cities. The key distinction here is the preference for smaller and medium buildings, like Jack Pine Place or the rowhomes in Victor Gardens. Defining these uses in the guidelines and using the same terms in the City Code reduces conflicts. The differences focus not only on unit count, but also in how the units are designed, specifically where access points are, and creates more consistency with the Building Code. Page 8 In order to promote these smaller and medium buildings, specific additions are added to large buildings to hopefully dissuade developers from building these product types over the smaller and medium buildings in Hugo. This includes the following: - At least 33% of each exterior wall shall be composed of brick, natural stone, or artificial stone. (Other buildings would be required to provide 25%.) - The ground level of any 3-story building and the first two stories of a building four stories or taller shall be visually distinct from the upper stories. This distinction shall be articulated by at least one of the following: an intermediate cornice line; an awning arcade or portico; a change in building materials, texture, or detailing; a change in window shape or treatment; or other elements which meet the objective. (Intended to create a distinct base to anchor these large buildings.) - A minimum of one-half of the required parking spaces shall be in an underground parking area or in a parking area below the building. These standards are not inconsistent with development standards in other cities, but the higher performance standards required for large buildings may encourage developers to build small and medium buildings in Hugo. General Updates Outside of the building types and flexibility there were numerous other minor updates, these include: - Updates to preferred materials and material mixes. - Ensuring consistency with the guidelines and what is proposed in the new Chapter 90 (Zoning and Land Use). - Addition of environmental and natural system preservation and stormwater reuse. - Removing specific measurements and percentages that were not found in the City Code and that are no longer relevant. Overall, the document was modernized to make it more accessible and user friendly. The photos and colors were updated to match the current logo and theme for Hugo. 3. CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS The proposed changes have been discussed in detail with City Staff and presented to the Joint Planning Commission and City Council Sessions for feedback at the April 23, 2026 joint meeting. This nearly two-year process encompasses changes that have been discussed over a much longer period of time. The changes are comprehensive, but many are administrative in nature focusing on clarity, consistency, and ease of use. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the draft Ordinance to repeal and replace Chapter 90 (Zoning and Land Use) in its entirety, as found in the attachments. The Zoning Map is adopted as part of the Zoning Ordinance and is found in the draft Ordinance. The Multi-Family Guidelines are not adopted as part of the City Code but are accepted by the City Council and used as guidelines for developers to understand the preferences of the City of Hugo. For this reason, Staff is asking the Planning Commission to recommend acceptance of the guidelines as drafted. Page 9 ATTACHMENTS: a. Draft Ordinance Repealing and Replacing Chapter 90 (Zoning and Land Use) b. Proposed Zoning Map c. Draft Multi-Family Design Guidelines, Dated June 15, 2026 1 CITY OF HUGO, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MN ORDINANCE NO. 2026-XX AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF HUGO, MINNESOTA REPEALING AND REPLACING CHAPTER 90 (ZONING AND LAND USE) OF THE HUGO CITY CODE THE CITY OF HUGO ORDAINS: Section 1. Amendment of the City Code. The existing Chapter 90 (Zoning and Land Use) of the City Code of Hugo, Minnesota, is hereby repealed and replaced in its entirety with the new Chapter 90 (Zoning and Land Use), which is found on the attached Exhibit A. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall take effect upon its passage. ADOPTED BY THE HUGO CITY COUNCIL ON JULY 6, 2026. _________________________________ Tom Weidt, Mayor Attest: __________________________________ Michele Lindau, City Clerk 2 Exhibit A Chapter 90 (Zoning and Land Use) CITY OF GO EST.1906 Zoning Map Proposed -(LA) Long Term Agricultural (AG) Agricultural (RR) Rural Residential (R-1) Large Lot Single-family Residential (R-2) Low-density Residential -(R-3) Single-and Two-family Residential -(R-4) Medi um-density Multi-family Residential -(R-5) High-density Multi-family Resi dential -(RC-I) Restricted Commercial -(C-1) Central Business -(C-2) General Business -(RI-I) Restricted Industrial -(1-1) General Industrial -(BP) Business Park -(FUS) Future Urban Service -(FCB) Future Central Business (PUD) Planned Unit Development Water □MUSA 0.5 'Miles 5/7/2026 NORTH Multi-Family Design Guidelines Shaping the community for today and tomorrow Last Updated: June 15, 2026 DRAFT TABLE OF CONTENTS BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE ........................................3 GOALS ............................................................................................4 STANDARDS ................................................................5 OVERVIEW ......................................................................................5 BUILDING MATERIALS .....................................................................7 BUILDING MASSING .......................................................................8 SCREENING ....................................................................................10 SIGNAGE AND LIGHTING .................................................................10 SITE PLANNING ...........................................................11 OVERVIEW ......................................................................................11 PUBLIC SPACES ...............................................................................12 BUILDING AND ENTRANCE PLACEMENT ............................................13 STREET DESIGN ..............................................................................14 PARKING AND ACCESS ......................................................................15 LANDSCAPING AND GREEN SPACE .....................................................17 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT ..........................................................19 SUSTAINABILITY COMMUNITIES .......................................................20 HEALTHY DESIGN ............................................................................20 IMPLEMENTATION ......................................................21 APPLICATION .................................................................................21 DOWNTOWN STANDARDS .................................................................21 Background And Purpose | 3 BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The City of Hugo has a Comprehensive Plan and Zoning and Land Use Chapter (Chapter 90) in the City Code that are used to guide and regulate multi-family residential developments. These tools have resulted in a mix of different styles of architecture and design within the community, with some developments providing a higher level of design. The City has prepared the Multi-Family Design Guidelines to better articulate the City of Hugo’s vision for their community and ensure that high-quality units are constructed. These guidelines will apply to townhouses and apartments (including condominiums and cooperatives). Every proposed development of multi-family housing in Hugo should utilize these guideline from the beginning of the site planning process to ensure conformity. The intent of this document is to utilize the guidelines to supplement the regulations in Chapter 90 (Zoning and Land Use) of the Hugo City Code. Chapter 90 will continue to be the regulatory enforcement tool; however, the design guidelines are intended to better articulate the City’s design requirements. Row Townhouses are a type of multi-family housing. Source: University of Minnesota A smaller apartment building is a type of multi-family housing option - Historic Legion Post Villas. Background And Purpose | 4 GOALS The multi-family design guidelines will be used to implement the goals identified in the City of Hugo’s Comprehensive Plan. The main objective of developing the design guidelines is to clearly define what the City envisions for multi-family developments. The guidelines will be a tool that property owners, developers, architects, land use planners and engineers can utilize to incorporate the City’s goals into their plans. They will also serve as a basis for uniform and consistent review of development proposals within Hugo. Goal 1: Provide for life-cycle housing Currently, the City of Hugo has a variety of housing options for people of different ages and incomes. This document contains provisions for lifecycle housing by encouraging quality multi-family housing options. Developments should include a variety of housing types within the project. Goal 2: Establish a consistent, high-quality design standard The City of Hugo has a mix of different types of multi-family developments within the community. Certain development design elements are preferred over others. The preferred elements should be carried out through these guidelines and incorporated into all multi-family developments within the City. Goal 3: Maintain a harmonious visual environment Through the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process, the City has been able to require a higher level of design from developers. The outcome of this higher level of design has been positive. However, the PUD process is not intended to be used for every project. The City will utilize these guidelines to ensure that a high level of design is maintained in all projects regardless of whether the project is completed under standard zoning or PUD. This will result in the homes holding their value over time. Goal 4: Communicate expectations for new development The design guidelines incorporate specific design criteria and graphics to help clearly communicate the City’s goals. The guidelines are intended to be used in conjunction with the City Code to execute the community’s vision for development. Goal 5: Preserve natural resources The City acknowledges that additional housing is needed to meet community goals, however, the guidelines are intended to encourage creative site design to provide housing and to preserve natural resources, including wetlands, trees, etc. Goal 6: Encourage small multi-family buildings. The City encourages developers to provide multi-family housing in smaller buildings. Large buildings are discouraged and some design flexibility will be provided for projects that can accomplish the City’s development and density goals with smaller buildings. Standards | 5 OVERVIEW These standards are the recommendations for the design of multi-family development within Hugo. The standards within this guide are vital for achieving the City’s goals. The primary purpose of these standards is to set basic parameters, describe preferences and illustrate design intent. These guidelines serve as principles within which creative design can and should occur – there is no one solution, but many options that meet the basic requirements of this document. The standards are presented to help guide development and allow for individual creativity when designing a project within Hugo. The City of Hugo does not have a historic architectural character for residential homes, although architectural standards have been adopted for certain PUD developments. New developments must meet the zoning and building code requirements regarding materials and construction methods allowed. New development site and building design should provide a visual cue that you are in Hugo. The use of regional building materials and native plants for development is encouraged. Definitions The multi-family design guidelines will differentiate between types of housing units and styles. Using the definitions found in Chapter 90 of the Hugo City Code, multi-family includes both townhouses and apartments. The key difference between the two is private vs. shared exterior entrances. STANDARDS Standards | 6 Small Buildings Small buildings are defined as having eight or fewer units per building. These may be either townhouse or apartment buildings and tend to fit the scale of traditional single-family homes developments well as a buffer between higher density or incompatible uses. Medium Buildings Medium buildings are defined as having nine to eighteen units per building. These may be either type of multi-family housing and are more compatible as stand alone housing developments or as a buffer between traditional single-family housing an high density or commercial uses. Medium buildings that are townhouses are allowed to exceed the maximum of eight units per building if they utilized stacked units but maintain the same design features of a townhouse. This means private exterior entrances on the ground floor, private attached garages, and no common shared areas for access. Large Buildings Large buildings are defined as having nineteen or more units per building. This would only include apartments not townhouses and is the more common apartment style multi-family housing found in cities. Medium Building Examples- Jack Pines Place and Oneka Fields Small Building Example- Rottlund Homes in Victor Gardens Large Building Example - Rosemary Apartments Standards | 7 BUILDING MATERIALS Buildings should be designed with high-quality and durable construction materials with proven records of long life-cycle and low environmental impacts on all sides. The following standards are expected: 1. The buildings should have equal architecture on all sides consisting of various high-quality materials. Architectural elements used on the front elevation (such as brick or stone accents, shutters, etc.) should be continued on all elevations. 2. The front facade should have a unique design with doors and windows. 3. At least 25% of a building should be of a higher quality materials, such as brick, stone, stucco, etc. 4. Metal panels may be allowed as a secondary material. 5. Avoid low-quality materials such as EIFS, mirrored materials, or faux windows. 6. A variety of different materials should be provided on all elevations. 7. The massing of the materials shall be coordinated with the building architecture. 8. The use of architecture and color to minimize the impact of garages is encouraged. Specifically, developers are encouraged to match the garage door to the unit’s primary exterior color rather than using only white garage doors. 9. Windows should be different sizes and shapes. Window shutters are encouraged to add visual interest. 10. A variety of unit types are encouraged within the development. 11. A variety materials and colors should be utilized as part of a master plan. Building Material Variation helps break up large facades High-quality materials enhance the appearance of a building Standards | 8 BUILDING MASSING Individual units should be articulated to break up the building facade on all elevations. This can be accomplished by incorporating heavier and more massive elements at the building base and lighter elements above the base. This can also be achieved through different types of materials, colors and rooflines, most preferably with a combination of these so that plain, unbroken wall and roof surfaces are not utilized. Rooflines and building elevations must be broken at a minimum of every 50 feet. Pitched roofs are preferred to flat roofs. The applicant must list building materials, roofing materials, and building colors on the plans. The plans must also identify building articulation, mechanical screening by architectural elements, parapet variations, entry, accent, and design elements on all sides of the building. To the maximum extent practicable, developments should limit the number of buildings adjacent to each other that are the same color, materials, or design. Buildings are encouraged to be located to avoid a monotonous development. The location of the garages will directly impact site design and will be discussed in more detail later in these guidelines. This includes limiting the overuse of the same materials and rooflines to prevent large, unbroken facades from a similar look and feel. COLUMNS CANOPIES WAINSCOT CORNER WALL VARIATION ROOF LINE VARIATIONWALL FACE VARIATION UPPER WALL BREAK Example of different facade elements to break up building massing Standards | 9 Building Architecture 1. Façade Articulation: • Minimum 2-foot variation in wall plane every 50 feet. • Distinct architectural treatment required for ground floor. • Balconies, bay windows, or other projections required on upper floors. • Maximum blank wall length: 30 feet horizontal, 15 feet vertical. • Minimum 15-foot break in building mass required for every 180 feet. • Maximum townhouse row: 8 units for small buildings, 18 for medium buildings if stacking units. 2. Windows and Entries • Minimum 30% window coverage on street-facing facades. • Individual entries required for townhouse ground-floor units. • Entry features must include minimum 4-foot projection or recess. • Windows must have visible trim minimum 4 inches wide. • Transom or sidelight windows required at main entries. • Each side or rear elevation should have at least one window or door opening. • A minimum of 12-inches for building eaves and overhangs. Additional Requirements for Large Buildings The City encourages smaller buildings to maintain a rural feel. To help encourage these types of buildings, Large Buildings have additional requirements they must follow: 1. At least 33% of each exterior wall shall be composed of brick, natural stone, or artificial stone. 2. The ground level of any 3-story building and the first two stories of a building four stories or taller shall be visually distinct from the upper stories. This distinction shall be articulated by at least one of the following: an intermediate cornice line; an awning arcade or portico; a change in building materials, texture, or detailing; a change in window shape or treatment; or other elements which meet the objective. 3. A minimum of one-half of the required parking spaces shall be in an underground parking area or in a parking area below the building. Standards | 10 SCREENING Special attention should be given to the screening of mechanical equipment. Mechanical equipment must be accessible for maintenance but screened by placing the mechanical equipment within the building or using other screening methods, such as fencing or landscaping. This includes screening all rooftop equipment as required in Section 90.36 Subd. (a).6.a.19 of the City Code. Ground mounted equipment and utility service structures (such as utility meters, utility lines, transformers, aboveground tanks) and ground mounted mechanical equipment must be screened from off-site views utilizing a double row of landscaping, a privacy fence or a wall that is at the same height as the structure it is screening or six feet, whichever is less to screen from off-site views. A chain link fence with slats shall not be accepted as screening. Fences are regulated by Section 90-227 and include provisions for height and setbacks. Below are some approved materials for fences in multi-family districts: • Black chain link • Decorative masonry or block • Wrought iron • Brick • Natural stone, dressed or undressed • Wood of proven exterior durability, such as cedar, redwood, or treated wood • Plastic fencing manufactured to look like wood fencing. Fences should be visually pleasing and not create any safety hazards due to placement or material. Fences should not be utilized between individual lots but are encouraged to be located around the perimeter of the development as a decorative element to unify the neighborhood. SIGNAGE AND LIGHTING Adequate lighting is essential for safety and aesthetics when developing a multi-family property. However, lighting should be designed not to be a nuisance or danger to surrounding businesses and neighbors. This includes following the glare and brightness restrictions in Section 90-238 of the City Code. Lighting should be designed to be an amenity as well as a safety feature. A master sign plan is desired and should be submitted by the applicant with the development plan. Mechanical equipment must be screened and not visible from any roadway Site Planning | 11 OVERVIEW Creative site planning and quality architecture are crucial to avoiding monotony. This document discusses various design elements that should be addressed in all new developments, including setbacks, massing, and architectural styles. Using variation in design will avoid the appearance of barracks during development. The standards below will help you create a site plan that enhances Hugo’s character and drives a creative direction for any site. While each project will have a unique and distinctive character, these site planning elements will help ensure cohesion across the City to help people know they are in Hugo. Transitions from proposed to existing developments should be provided to minimize the impact on adjacent parcels by placing lower-height buildings near property lines with low-density use. SITE PLANNING The site should be recognizable and cohesive such as Jacks Pines Place development shown above. The site plan should show a unified neighborhood and development through building placement and spacing. Site Planning | 12 PUBLIC SPACES Developers are encouraged to create a mix of public and private spaces throughout a project to help contribute to the City of Hugo. This may include enhanced ground floor landscaping, seating, or additional pet-oriented amenities. When developments include the addition of public plazas and parks, the City and developer should enter into an agreement on access, maintenance, and security for such facilities to enhance the number of users and the amenities utility. Amenities that create gathering spaces or characterize a development should be implemented. For example, adding gazebos in open spaces and benches along trails gives the development a unified and cohesive character. A minimum of 10% of the upland area should be preserved as common open space in townhouse and apartment developments. The common open space should be easily accessible by all community residents. Tot lots and community gardens are encouraged. Small or narrow, unusable strips of green space are highly discouraged. Developers are encouraged to connect adjacent properties and streets, trails, and sidewalks. Private parks and conservation areas should be contiguous to existing or planned parks and conservation areas. Public access to these areas is preferred. Public Spaces should be central and match the development theme Benches and plazas along paths can delineate public spaces Site Planning | 13 BUILDING AND ENTRANCE PLACEMENT Building setbacks are determined by the Zoning and Land Use Chapter in Section 90, Article IV Division 1. The type of unit and location on the property can be flexible to provide more options for creative design and prevent repetition and cookie-cutter development. Buildings should be placed to enhance resident and passerby enjoyment, with parking areas to the rear or side of the building and main entrances facing the street. This includes positioning buildings around high-quality natural or built amenities to help create a sense of place for any new development. Developments should preserve view-sheds and the natural environment such as wetlands, drainage ways, mature stands of trees, and the like, to the best of their ability. Buildings should provide a variety of unit types. Some units should include accessibility provisions so that a percentage of the units built within a single development have at least one entrance to a home at grade, with a paved accessible route. Developers are encouraged to include front porches or patios and windows that face all streets. This will help create a sense of place within the community and promote street safety. Walk-ups are preferred to shared external staircases in any type of development and individual garages or parking structures are required to be attached. Building entrances should be oriented towards the streets with garages and parking to the rear. Site Planning | 14 STREET DESIGN Streets should be designed to slow neighborhood traffic and create a sense of place. The City street grid is a vital to overall safety and transportation function in the City, so restoring street connections that connect to the existing street grid is encouraged. Disconnected streets and cul-de-sacs are discouraged. Pedestrian safety should be a priority when designing public streets. Enhancements to safety, including crosswalks, narrowed intersections, lighting, planted center medians, and landscaped boulevards that include street trees are encouraged. Streets should also be designed with snow storage in mind. Plans should identify snow storage areas and snow removal plans. Cul-de-sac islands are encouraged for snow storage. However, plant materials in the cul-de sac islands must be carefully chosen to ensure healthy growth and longevity. Cul- de-sac islands should be irrigated. PORCHES STREET LIGHTING STREET TREES FRONT YARDS BUILDING LINE Example Street Design Elements Streets should be comfortable for all user types, promoting safe speeds visibility Site Planning | 15 PARKING AND ACCESS New multi-family development should comply with the parking requirements in Section 90-252 of the City Code and these guidelines. Section 90-252 of the City Code requires parking stalls for different types of residential development. Where one exists, the Homeowner’s Association (HOA) documents must include language limiting on-street parking. Required off-street parking should be located within garages or underground parking structures. All townhouses and townhouse developments are required to have private garage access as identified in Section 90-218 Subd. E. The layout of the building should not place the garage in front of the home. This will minimize the dominance of the garage and allow the first view of the unit to be an architecturally pleasing entrance. The use of color to match the garage door to the main exterior of the unit is highly encouraged, as it will also minimize the dominance of the garage. Garage-forward or “snout-house” townhouses are highly discouraged as they dominate the view from the street and sidewalk. Garages are encouraged to face each other on a drive aisle and should not front onto a public street. Garage entries should be from rear or side where possible. Driveway placement and design can be found in Section 90-215 of the City Code. In addition to these requirements, driveways should be placed to enhance access to the site and prevent conflicts with existing or planned pedestrian facilities or bike lanes. As with parking areas, driveways should direct vehicle traffic to the rear of a site and maintain landscaping and green spaces on the street side of a development. Driveways in front of attached garages should be a minimum of 22 feet in length. Different lengths are encouraged to reduce repetition; however, the driveways must allow for adequate vehicle parking without obstructing sidewalks, private drives, or public streets. Surface parking areas for guest parking should be well landscaped and provided throughout the development as the City ordinance requires. “Snout houses” that are garage forward should be avoided Driveways and garages should be placed on the side or rear of buildings Site Planning | 16 Parking lots should provide landscape islands at each end of the parking bay and bays in excess of 15 spaces in length should be divided by intermediate islands. Trees shall be located in the islands to shade the parking lot to reduce the heat island effect. These end landscape islands shall provide at least adequate of area for planting trees, shrubs and/or groundcovers. Buffer landscaping should be provided between parking and living spaces. Bicycle racks should be provided for all apartments and may be placed near the entrance if a minimum 5-foot wide pedestrian access to the building entrance is maintained. Bicycle parking may occupy a maximum of two required parking stalls without requiring additional parking. Where possible, parking lots should incorporate stormwater management into the parking lot as an amenity feature. These features, when appropriately designed, can be used to meet the landscape island requirements. Any lighting used to illuminate an off-street parking area shall be so arranged as to reflect glare away from adjoining property, adjacent residential uses and public rights-of-way and be in compliance with Section 90-238 of the City Code. Bike Infrastructure Parking and street areas should offer enhanced groundcover and landscaping to screen and reduce visual impact Site Planning | 17 LANDSCAPING AND GREEN SPACE Site design and landscaping should be designed to work with the existing topography of the area, wooded areas, wetlands and natural view- sheds and corridors. Sustainability, in terms of the landscape, is the ability of plant species to maintain healthy growth with minimal human assistance. Selecting plants suited for a specific condition is key to their sustainability over time. Benefits of utilizing sustainable plant species include less time spent towards maintenance, less maintenance costs, and positive contributions to the larger environment and its ability to perpetuate itself. Development landscaping shall include a full complement of overstory and understory trees, shrubbery and ground covers which are hardy and appropriate for the locations in which they are planted and provide year-long color and interest. A list of prohibited species of trees and shrubs can be found in Section 90-236 of the City Code. Developments should promote native plants that add to the wildlife and pollinator habitats found in Hugo. All land area not occupied by buildings, parking, driveways, sidewalks or other hard surfaces shall be sodded or mulched and landscaped with approved ground cover, flowers, shrubbery and trees. Native prairie plantings and bee lawns, which includes low growing flowers and turf grasses, are viable options to traditional lawns in Hugo. The plant composition of these alternatives are widely varied and can be tailored to suit specific conditions and aesthetics. The overriding concept is that they provide habitat, food and shelter for a variety of animals, birds and insects and they are sustainable with minimal intervention. An overlooked benefit of prairies and bee lawns is that they visually change with the seasons, providing a changing view throughout the year. The City supports the use of these ground covers when a maintenance plan is provided for review and approval by the City. Rain gardens and colorful year-round plantings should be found throughout Pollinator gardens and native plants are encouraged throughout a development Site Planning | 18 Maintenance agreements should be executed for the upkeep and ongoing maintenance of these green spaces and planned landscaping. This is essential to continue providing residents with high-quality landscaping and prevent injury or liability for overgrown areas. Well-landscaped open areas should be provided at the main road entryway to the developments. Gateway or welcoming design elements, including water or landscape features, signage, and lighting, are encouraged. All developments are required to dedicate parkland or a fee lieu of land as found in Section 90-324 of the City Code. In addition, developments should preserve and enhance existing natural features such as dense woods or vegetation, wetlands, rivers, lakes, streams, and many more. Buildings and related sidewalks and trails should be placed to take advantage of the views and access to these enhanced natural features and any newly created green spaces. High-quality landscaping and green space design may include playgrounds and sports fields Landscaping along sidewalks and trails helps direct people and provides a visual buffer Site Planning | 19 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT Water features and drainage systems are essential components of development in the district. A mix of ponds, fountains and other water elements provide focal amenities and year round activities within the framework of an environmentally responsible, visually pleasing strategy to manage stormwater. Each site has a responsibility to utilize best management practices (BMP) to pretreat run-off, reduce erosion and encourage infiltration in compliance with City and watershed standards. Water and landscape should be utilized within multipurpose areas that accommodate both active and passive recreational use – the following examples illustrate only a few of many possibilities: 1. Pervious pavements, underground storage and other creative techniques should be used to meet BMP standards, particularly in areas where more density is expected. 2. Stormwater reuse is encouraged, but not feasible on all sites. Developers should utilize it in their development where feasible. 3. Green architecture, expressed through green roofs, gray water recycling and other techniques should be included to reduce the impact of new development on stormwater systems. 4. Water feature design should include both formal elements (such as reflecting pools or fountains) and natural/informal forms (such as ponds or fountains) and should explore creative ways to integrate wet landscapes with active, urban spaces. All developments should provide a Chloride Management Plan. Studies (see MCES publication regarding Nine Mile Creek, March 2021) show that chloride (or salt) found in surface waters and shallow aquifers has been increasing over the past 20 years. One source of the river’s chloride is the salt applied to our streets, parking lots, driveways and sidewalks in the winter and results in peak chloride values between March and May. Due to the chloride’s toxicity on the environment, watershed organizations and regulatory agencies have increased their focus on the urban sources and some watersheds are implementing practices for reducing salt applications. Functional and blended stormwater facilities enhance the overall development Site Planning | 20 SUSTAINABILITY COMMUNITIES Community design impacts the health of all those who live, work, worship, play, learn, or travel in Hugo. Creative design should promote safety, beauty, community health, and social development. This includes public green spaces, trails and paths, access to food options, and many other things. These things are known to promote healthier lifestyles and better use of the land for long-term development. In addition, green practices during building, such as alternative energy systems, stormwater reuse, greywater reuse, and other sustainable practices, should be pursued to reduce the required resources for development and the long-term impacts on Hugo. HEALTHY DESIGN Sidewalks, trails, bike lanes, and parks are some improvements that promote healthy living and give people options to get around outside vehicle use. These facilities also create safer routes for people to access Hugo’s other commercial, social, or civic uses. More people will access the site in multi-family developments than single-family developments on parcels of the same size, which promotes commercial development nearby. Ensuring the design provides safe and connected amenities for residents and visitors will promote healthy lifestyles and choices. Electric vehicle charging infrastructure should be provided for all new multi-family structures. Landscaping, paths or trails and other amenities promote a healthy community Natural spaces enhance livability and the overall feel of a development Implementation | 21 APPLICATION These design guidelines supplement the City Code requirements and Comprehensive Plan and provide residents, developers, and city staff with an understanding of the expectations for new multi- family development. To ensure uniformity, these guidelines may be amended or updated to reflect market and social changes to the city of Hugo. Staff will administer the design guidelines as part of the development review process. Staff will incorporate design review to ensure compliance with the design guidelines as a standard step in the development review process. DOWNTOWN STANDARDS The Hugo Downtown Plan & Design Guidelines contain separate guidelines for the Downtown District. While these guidelines take a more compressive approach to development in the core of Hugo, they also have additional standards for multi-family developments that only apply in these areas. These differences include mixed-use and ground-floor retail and activation, as well as different lot placement and parking requirements. These Multi-family Design Guideline standards are in addition to the Downtown Plan & Design Guidelines; however, they do not take precedent over any of those guidelines for design elements and requirements where applicable. IMPLEMENTATION The Downtown Standards are additional guidelines for areas within Downtown Hugo. Financing for this project was provided by the Metropolitan Council Metropolitan Livable Communities Fund.