Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1999.08.02 ORD 1999-334CITY OF HUGO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 1999-334 AN INTERIM ORDINANCE PROTECTING THE PLANNING PROCESS AND THE HEALTH, SAFETY AND WELFARE OF CITY RESIDENTS, AND ESTABLISHING A TEMPORARY DEVELOPMENT MORATORIUM ON RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE METROPOLITAN URBAN SERVICE AREA. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF HUGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Ordinance is to establish a temporary development moratorium on residential development within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. It is the belief of the City Council that the City's existing "official controls" may not adequately contemplate or address the rapid growth which the City is currently experiencing with respect to residential development. The City has identified four (4) specific areas that require study. Those four (4) general areas are as follows: A. City Staffing Requirements. Specifically, whether or not the City of Hugo has a sufficient number of employees to deal with the rapid increase of development which is occurring in Hugo. Residential development has caused a "resource drain" upon City staff time. A study needs to be conducted to determine whether or not the City should hire or contract with additional individuals for planning, zoning, or marketing services, or could additional support staff handle the work. The budgetary impacts of these proposals also need to be studied. If additional persons are not hired, a question also arises as to whether or not the public should be charged an hourly rate for the use of staff time. Specifically, City staff is being taken away from its traditional functions in order to deal on a more regular basis with development concerns. Should these costs be passed on to developers and, if so, how? In short, how can the City administer its "official controls" through the use of existing or additional personnel? B. City Space. Not only is City staff dealing with a "resource drain," but City space is also suffering. Specifically, there is not enough working space in the existing City Hall to handle the influx of recent Rev. 08/17/99 residential development. A study needs to be taken to determine if the City can obtain additional workable office space within the confines of the City at a reasonable price. If additional space is not available for lease or purchase, then the City needs to determine if the existing City Hall can be expanded, or if a new City Hall should be built. If a new City Hall is to be built, then a decision also needs to be made on what to do with the existing City Hall and how to plan for the transition from one location to another. In any case, the City needs to be aware of budget constraints. In short, the City needs to plan for its space requirements so that it can effectively administer its "official controls." C. Water Issues. With the recent influx of residential development, questions have arisen regarding the ability of the City's municipal water service to keep up with the demands on water. A number of specific issues need to be studied, specifically as follows: 1. Minimum Standards. Specifically, in dealing with new developments, a certain "fire flow" needs to be met. In the past, the City has looked at the minimum fire flow standards as outlined within the Uniform Fire Code. The City has become aware that other cities, however, have chosen a higher standard so that they have some amount of "bounce" within their system. A study needs to be undertaken to determine what level the City should rely on in reviewing new developments. 2. Methodology. In the past, the City has relied upon expert opinions provided by the City's Engineer as to whether or not a given development complied with the "fire flow" requirements. Some developers have had their own experts come in and use a separate methodology which came up with a different result than the City Engineer. A study needs to be taken and a decision should be made by the City Council as to picking one specific methodology to follow. Accordingly, the Council would like the City Engineer's office to provide information to the City Council regarding the engineering theories used in his methodology, explaining both engineering theory and the computer model which he utilizes. The City would also like the City Engineer to field test the City water system to determine if the actual conditions present in the City correlate to a reasonable degree of engineering certainty with his computer model and Rev. 08/17/99 2 theory. If a reliable and accurate methodology can be determined, then it would be the intent of the City to accept that one methodology in reviewing future applications. This would provide for a more fair and uniform method of reviewing all applications and also would save precious City staff time. 3. System Requirements. The City is currently studying the issue of whether or not the current system requirements are adequate to deal with existing homes which are already on line. The study needs to go further to determine how future development will affect the existing system. That report will need to define physically how the system can be added on to to deal with the influx of residential development. For example, are additional water towers necessary and, if so, where will they be located and how will they be paid for? Could there be some other physical improvements to the system, short of a water tower, such as new wells which would be sufficient (and less costly) in order to improve the water system (and, if so, where would those wells be located). D. City Zoning and Subdivision Standards. Through the influx of residential development, debate has gone on as to the existing standards currently in existence for the City. The City Council believes that, in order to properly deal with future development, the standards should be revisited as soon as possible. Specifically, at least the following issues should be addressed" Rev. 08/17/99 1. Roads. Currently Hugo allows private roads to be constructed in developments in certain circumstances. The City is aware that other communities do not allow private roads. Private roads tend to be constructed to a narrower width than public roads. This allows developers to place more residential homes on a given piece of property. The end result is that more homes are using roads which are narrower. Additionally, at the end of the expected useful life of these roads, those homeowners are then to be expected, on their own, to pay for improvements of those roads to the then existing standards. The City needs to address whether the City should change its policy to prohibit private roads, including considering the pros and cons of each alternative. 2. Planned Unit Development Density Standards. Planned Unit Developments (PUDs) are designed to 3 encourage more creative thinking in developments. A question has arisen as to whether PUDs are being used in Hugo to foster creativity, or whether they are being used simply for the purpose of creating as many residential lots as possible. The City is aware that some jurisdictions have a rule limiting the density within PUDs to that density which would be allowed pursuant to the underlying zoning classification. The City needs to study this issue to determine whether or not changes need to be made to this standard. 3. Lot Sizes. Currently, the minimum lot size in the City of Hugo is 10,400 square feet. The City is aware that other neighboring cities have much larger minimum standards. The City needs to make a policy decision as to whether or not the current lot size standard is sufficient. Specifically, does the City want larger lots, or does the City wish to remain committed to smaller lots, which tend to also equate into more affordable lots for starter homes. This issue needs to be studied and a decision made. 4. Open Spaces. As residential development is happening at a much faster rate than anyone anticipated, the question is whether or not sufficient open spaces are being preserved for future generations. This issue needs to be studied. There is a need for the City Council to adopt an Interim Ordinance to protect the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Hugo. An Interim Ordinance or moratorium will allow the City of Hugo and its citizens to retain the benefits of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance until the City finishes the studies referenced herein. There is a need to restrict residential development within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area until such studies are finished, and until any changes are made to the City's official controls. As such, the Hugo City Council, contemporaneously with the passing of this Ordinance, hereby directs its City staff to commence such studies immediately. Section 2. The moratorium approved herein shall apply only to residential development occurring within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. The City of Hugo believes that, by narrowing the scope of the moratorium to this single type of development and within a specific geographical area of the City will help to allow development to take place in other places and other ways, thus providing the most minimum intrusion possible into the future development of land in the City. It is the intent of the City to Rev. 08/17/99 4 narrowly tailor this moratorium so that it's impact on residents will be minimized as much as possible. The Council is aware that there are currently approximately 1,400 residential homesites in the process of being developed in the City of Hugo. Of this amount, approximately 860 are awaiting preliminary plat approval. Additionally, out of this total number, only 21 are outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. Accordingly, it is the belief of the City that those lots outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area do not need to be delayed in order for the City to properly deal with the study issues referenced above. Specifically, they have little affect on City time and space issues because there are so few applications in that category. Additionally, as they are outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area, they do not impact the City's municipal water system. Also, there have been no PUD applications outside the MUSA line. Finally, the lots outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area tend to be larger lots and, therefore, the density issues are not brought into play. Additionally, in the last four (4) years, the City has had a total of only two (2) building permits issued in the City for commercial or industrial properties. In comparison, the following is a list of permits issued for single-family development purposes: 1988 - 54 1989 - 47 1990 - 51 1991 - 67 1992 - 66 1993 - 88 1994 - 80 1995 - 99 1996 - 64 1997 - 18 1998 - 32 1999 (through May 24) - 80 In addition to the eighty (80) single-family residential building permits already issued in 1999, there are approximately 1,000 more which are working their way through the system. Accordingly, it is the belief of the City Council that residential development is the only type of development that needs to be curtailed during the time of this study. Simply stated, other forms of development are so de minimis that they have no real affect upon the issues being studied during the term of the moratorium. Section 3. Authority. Minnesota Statutes §462.355, Subd. 4 permits the adoption of interim zoning ordinances for the purpose of protecting the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of its citizens. Rev. 08/17/99 Section 4. Conclusions. The City Council finds that it is necessary in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens, to protect the planning process, to conduct the studies described above, and to place a moratorium on residential development within the MUSA during the term of the studies.. Section 5. Development Moratorium. A. A study is hereby authorized and directed to be conducted by the City staff to study and decide how the City should amend its official controls with respect to those items addressed herein. Upon finishing the studies, the City Council shall review the matter and make such decisions as are in the best interests of the City of Hugo. B. Pending completion of the studies and adoption of any amendments to the City's official controls, it shall be unlawful for any person to subdivide residential land within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area of the City of Hugo. Additionally, during the period of time of the moratorium, no applications shall be processed and no land use approvals shall be considered or issued for subdivision until the studies referenced herein are completed and the City Council has made a decision as to the "official controls." C. For the purposes of the moratorium, the term "residential subdivision" shall be defined in the Hugo City Code to include both major and minor subdivisions. D. That the Council recognizes that they do not possess, individually, the expertise necessary to address each of these study areas. Accordingly, City Staff is hereby directed to recommend the hiring of those experts which will assist the City in property analyzing and studying the issues described herein. Section 6. Exceptions. This moratorium shall not apply to: A. The lawful use of an existing subdivision. B. Construction, location or development of subdivisions which have received all necessary permits and approvals, or have received preliminary plat approval from the City prior to the date of the approval of this Ordinance. C. The creation of cemetery lots. D. Subdivisions resulting from court orders, or the adjustment of a lot line by the movement of a common boundary. Rev. 08/17/99 6 E. Subdivisions that are entirely outside of the 2020 Metropolitan Urban Development Area. F. Commercial or industrial developments. Section 7. Enforcement. The City may enforce any provisions of this Ordinance by mandamus, injunction or any other appropriate civil remedy in any court of competent jurisdiction. Section 8. Term. Unless earlier terminated by action of the City Council, this Ordinance shall be effective for twelve (12) months from its effective date and may be further extended for such additional periods as the City Council may deem appropriate, not exceeding a total additional period of eighteen (18) months. Section 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. WHEREUPON, said Ordinance was declared passed and adopted this 2nd day of August, 1999. ATTEST: Mary Creager, Ci, Clerk Rev. 08/17/99 7 Walter L. S ��50"lt'zi6An. Mayor 'PRI'NTER'S AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF MINNESOTA) § County of Ramsey ) I, the publisher, or the publisher's designated agent, being duly sworn, on oath state that I am the publisher, or the publisher's designated agent and an employee of the newspaper known as The White Bear CITY OF HUGO Press, and that I have full knowledge of the facts which are stated The Hugo City Council will hold a public hearing on August 2, 1999, at 7:05 pm, Hugo below: City Hall, consider adoption of an interim ordinance protecting the planning pr (A) The newspaper has complied with all of the requirements constitut- process and the health, safety and welfare of City residents by establishing a temporary development ing qualification as a qualified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota moratorium on residential development within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. A full and Statute 331A.02, 331A.07, and other applicable laws, as amended. complete copy of the proposed ordinance is on file in the office of the City Clerk. All written and (B) The Printed CITY OF HUGO oral comments will be heard at this time. Mary Ann Creager, City Clerk PUBLIC HEARING 1999. fished in the White Bear Press July 14, which is attached was cut from the columns of said newspaper, and was printed and published once each week, for successive weeks; it was first published on WEDNESDAY , the 14 _day of JULY , 1999, and was thereafter printed and published on every to and including , the day of , 19 ; and printed below is a copy of the lower case alphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is hereby acknowledged as being the size and kind of type used in the composition and publication of the notice: abcdefghijklmnopgrstuvwxyz TITLE: Publisher Subscribed and sworn to before me on this 14 day of JULY ,: MATRICE SCHAFER,' NOTARY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA Notary Public, Ramsey County, Minn. My commission expires January 31. 2000. (1) Lowest classified rate paid by commercial users for comparable space. (2) Maximum rate allowed by law for the above matter. (3) Rate actually charged for the above matter. (Line, word, or inch rate) (Line, word, or inch rate) $ 6.00/INCH (Line, word, or inch rate) .PRINTER'S AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION CITY OF HUGO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ORDINANCE NO. 1999-334 AN INTERIM ORDINANCE PROTECTING THE PLANNING PROCESS AND THE HEALTH, SAFETY STATE OF MINNESOTA) AND WELFARE OF CITY RESIDENTS, AND ESTABLISHING A County of Ramsey § ) TEMPORARY DEVELOPMENT MORATORIUM ON RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT WITHIN THE additional water towers necessary and, if iblisher's designated agent, being duly sworn, METROPOLITAN URBAN SERVICE AREA. so, where will they be located and how THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF will they be paid for? Could there be the publisher, or the publisher's designated HUGO DOES HEREBY ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: some other physical improvements to Section 1. Purpose. The purpose of this the system, short of a water tower, such of the newspaper known as The White Bear Ordinance is to establish a temporary develop- as new wells which would be sufficient ment moratorium on residential development (and less costly) in order to improve the `ull knowledge of the facts which are stated within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. It water system (and, if so, where would is the belief of the City Council that the City's those wells be located). existing "official controls" may not adequately D. City Zoning and Subdivision Standards contemplate or address the rapid growth which Through the influx of residential development, Implied with all of the requirements constitut- the City is currently experiencing with respect debate has gone on as to the existing stan- to residential development. dards currently in existence for the City. The alified newspaper, as provided by Minnesota The City has identified four (4) specific City Council believes that, in order to properly areas that require study. Those four (4) general deal with future development, the standards and other applicable laws, as amended. areas are as follows: A. should be revisited as soon as possible. , City Staffinq Requirements Specifically, Specifically, at least the following issues should �' OF HUGO whether or not the City of Hugo has a sufficient be addressed: number of employees to deal with the rapid 1. Roads. Currently Hugo allows private [NANCE NO. 1999-334 increase of development which is occurring in roads to be constructed in developments Hugo. Residential development has caused a "resource in certain circumstances. The City is ut from the columns of said newspaper, and drain" upon City staff time. A study aware that other communities do not needs to be conducted to determine whether allow private roads. Private roads tend to �d once each week, for weeks; or not the City should hire or contract with be constructed to a narrower width than _successive additional individuals for planning, zoning, or public roads. This allows developers to in WEDNESDAY the 18 day of marketing services, or could additional support place more residential homes on a given staff handle the work. The budgetary impacts piece of property. The end result is that and was thereafter printed and published on of these proposals also need to be studied. If more homes are using roads which are -, additional persons are not hired, a question narrower. Additionally, at the end of the to and including , also arises as to whether or not the public expected useful life of these roads, those should be charged an hourly rate for the use of homeowners are then to be expected, on 19 ; and printed below is a staff time. Specifically, City staff is being taken their own, to pay for improvements of ray from its traditional functions in order to those roads to the then existing Stan- dphabet from A to Z, both inclusive, which is gal on a more regular basis with development dards. The City needs to address ncerns. Should these costs be passed on to whether the City should change its policy 3 being the size and kind of type used in the developers and, if so, how? In short, how can the City administer its "official to prohibit private roads, including con- sidering the pros and cons of each alter- :ion of the notice: controls" through the use of existing or native. additional personnel? B. City Space, Not only is City staff dealing "resource 2. Planned Unit Development Density Standards. Planned Unit Developments with a drain," but City space is also suffering. Specifically, there is not enough (PUDs) are designed to encourage more P �' working space in the existing City Hall to han- creative thinking in developments. A question has arisen as to whether PUDs / dle the influx of recent residential development. A study needs to be taken to determine if the are being used in Hugo to foster creativi- ITLE: Publisher City can obtain additional workable office ty, or whether they are being used simply for the purpose of creating as many resi- space within the confines of the City at a rea- sonable price. If additional space is not avail- dentia) lots as possible. The City is before me on able for lease or purchase, then the City needs aware that some jurisdictions have a rule limiting the density within PUDs to that T to determine if the existing City Hall can be density which would be allowed pur- expanded, or if a new City Hall should be built. If a new City Hall is to be built, then a decision suant to the underlying zoning classifica- MATRICE SCHAFERS also needs to be made on what to do with the City Hall how tion. The City needs to study this issue to determine whether or not changes NOTApy PUBLIC - MINNESOTA RAMSEY COUNTY existing and to plan for the tran- need to be made to this standard. sition from one location to another. In any 3. Lot Sizes Currently, the minimum lot case, the City needs to be aware of budget constraints. size in the City of Hugo is 10,400 square No ar u lic Ramsey County, Minn. Y In short, the City needs to plan for its space feet. The City is aware that other neigh- boring cities have much larger minimum requirements so that it can effectively adminis- "official standards. The City needs to make a My commission expires January 31. 2000. ter its controls." C. Water Issues With the recent influx of policy decision as to whether or not the -------------------------------------------- residential development, questions have arisen current lot size standard is sufficient. Specifically, does the City want larger RATE INFORMATION regarding the ability of the City's municipal lots, or does the City wish to remain water service to keep up with the demands on water. A number of specific issues need to be committed to smaller lots, which tend to also equate into more affordable lots for � by studied, specifically as follows: 1. Minimum Standard Specifically, starter homes. This issue needs to be paid comparable in dealing with new developments, a cer- "fire studied and a decision made. 4. Open Spaces As residential develop- (Line, word, or inch rate) tain flow" needs to be met. In the past, the City has looked at the minimum ment is happening at a much faster rate fire flow standards as outlined within the than anyone anticipated, the question is whether or not sufficient open spaces ed by law for Uniform Fire Code. The City has become aware that other cities, however, have are being preserved for future genera- (Line, word, or inch rate) chosen a higher standard so that they tions. This issue needs to be studied. There is a need for the City Council to have some amount of "bounce" within their system. A study needs to be under- adopt an Interim Ordinance to protect the plan- d for the $ 6.00/INCH e taken to determine what level the City Hing process and the health, safety and welfare of the residents of the City of Hugo. An Interim (Line, word, or inch rate) should rely on in reviewing new develop- Ordinance or moratorium will allow the City of ments. 2. Methodology. In the past, the City has Hugo and its citizens to retain the benefits of the City's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning relied upon expert opinions provided by the City's Engineer as to whether or not Ordinance until the City finishes the studies ref- a given development complied with the "fire erenced herein. There is a need to restrict resi- dential development within the Metropolitan flow" requirements. Some develop- Urban Service Area until such studies are fin- ers have had their own experts come in and use a separate methodology which fished, and until any changes are made to the •` Came up with a different result than the City's official controls. As such, the Hugo City Council, contemporaneously with the passing City Engineer. A study needs to be taken of this Ordinance, hereby directs its City staff rr- ;and a decision should be made by the :City Council as to picking one specific to commence such studies immediately. methodology to follow. Accordingly, the Section 2. The moratorium approved here- in shall apply only to residential development ;. Council would like the City Engineer's office to provide information to the City occurring within the Metropolitan Urban Council regarding the engineering theo- Service Area. The City of Hugo believes that, by narrowing the scope of the moratorium to ries used in his methodology, explaining both engineering theory and the comput- this single type of development and within a er model which he utilizes. The City specific geographical area of the City will help to allow development to take place in other r r: Would also like the City Engineer to field test the City water system to determine if places and other ways, thus providing the most -` the actual conditions present in the City Correlate to a reasonable degree minimum intrusion possible into the future development of land in the City. It is the intent of en gi- veering certainty with his computer of the City to narrowly tailor this moratorium so Model and theory. If a reliable and accu- that it's impact on residents will be minimized a? rate methodology can be determined, as much as possible. The Council is aware that there are currently approximately 1,400 resi- then it would be the intent of the City to dential homesites in the process of being accept that one methodology in review- ing future applications. This would pro- developed in the City of Hugo. Of this amount, vide for a more fair and uniform method approximately 860 are awaiting preliminary plat approval. Additionally, out of this total number, of reviewing all applications and also would save precious City staff time. only 21 are outside of the Metropolitan Urban Service Area. Accordingly, it is the belief of the 3. System Requirements The City is cur.- City that those lots outside the Metropolitan rently studying the issue of whether or Urban Service Area do not need to be delayed not the current system requirements are in order for the City to properly deal with the adequate to deal with existing homes study issues referenced above. Specifically, which are already on line. The study they needs to go further to determine how have little affect on City time and space issues because there are so few applications in future development will affect the exist- that category. Additionally, as they are outside ing system. That report will need to the Metropolitan Urban Service Area, they do define physically how the system can be not impact the City's municipal water system. added on to to deal with the influx of res- Also, there have been no PUD applications idential development. For example, are outside the MUSA line. Finally, the lots outside the Metropolitan Urban Service Area tend to be larger lots and, therefore, the density issues are not brought into play. Additionally, in the last four (4) years, the City has had a total of only two (2) building per- mits issued in the City for commercial or indus- trial properties. In comparison, the following is a list of permits issued for single-family devel- opment purposes 1988-54 1989-47 1990-51 1991 -67 1992-66 1993-88 1994-80 1995-99 1996-64 1997-18 1998-32 1999 (through May 24) - 80 In addition to the eighty (80) single-family residential building permits already issued in 1999, there are approximately 1,000 more which are working their way through the sys- tem. Accordingly, it is the belief of the City Council that residential development is the only type of development that needs to be curtailed during the time of this study. Simply stated, other forms of development are so de minimis that they have no real affect upon the issues being studied during the term of the moratori- um. Section 3. Authority, Minnesota Statutes §462.355, Subd. 4 permits the adoption of interim zoning ordinances for the purpose of protecting the planning process and the health, safety and welfare of its citizens. Section 4. Conclusions. The City Council finds that it is necessary in order to protect the health, safety and welfare of its citizens, to pro- tect the planning process, to conduct the stud- ies described above, and to place a moratori- um on residential development within the MUSA during the term of the studies. Section 5. Development Moratorium y A. A study is hereby authorized and direct- ed to be conducted by the City staff to study and decide how the City should amend its official controls with respect to those items addressed herein. Upon finishing the studies, the City Council shall review the matter and make such decisions as are in the best interests of the City of Hugo. B. Pending completion of the studies and adoption of any amendments to the City's official controls, it shall be unlaw- ful for any person to subdivide residen- tial land within the Metropolitan Urban Service Area of the City of Hugo. Additionally, during the period of time of the moratorium, no applications shall be processed and no land use approvals shall be considered or issued for subdi- vision until the studies referenced herein are completed and the City Council has made a decision as to the "official con- trols." C. For the purposes of the moratorium, the term "residential subdivision" shall be defined in the Hugo City Code to include both major and minor subdivisions. D. That the Council recognizes that they do not possess, individually, the expertise necessary to address each of these study areas. Accordingly, City Staff is hereby directed to recommend the hiring of those experts which will assist the City in property analyzing and studying the issues described herein. Section 6. Exceptions. This moratorium shall not apply to: A. The lawful use of an existing subdivision. B. Construction, location or development of subdivisions which have received all necessary permits and approvals, or have received preliminary plat approval from the City prior to the date of the approval of this Ordinance. C. The creation of cemetery lots. D. Subdivisions resulting from court orders, or the adjustment of a lot line by the movement of a common boundary. E. Subdivisions that are entirely outside of the 2020 Metropolitan Urban Development Area. F. Commercial or industrial developments. Section 7. Enforcement. The City may enforce any provisions of this Ordinance by mandamus, injunction or any other appropriate civil remedy in any court of competent jurisdic- tion. Section 8. Term. Unless earlier terminated by action of the City Council, this Ordinance shall be effective for twelve (12) months from its effective date and may be further extended for such additional periods as the City Council may deem appropriate, not exceeding a total additional period of eighteen (18) months. Section 9. Effective Date. This Ordinance shall be effective immediately upon its passage and publication according to law. WHEREUPON, said Ordinance was declared passed and adopted this 2nd day of August, 1999. Walter L. Stoltzman, Mayor ATTEST: Mary Ann Creager, City Clerk Published in the White Bear Press August 18, 1999. I\ IT, Hwy. 96 at Centerville Rd (across from Cub) 653-8711 Open: Mon. - Fri. 7 am - 9 pm Sat. 7:30 am - 6 pm Sun. 10 am - 5 pm It 1 $1399 I 1 Good only at White Bear Tires Plus. Not valid with any other discounts or coupons. Expires B-25-99 1 Add $1.99 disposal fee. (most cam) With Coupon iiiiiiiiiiitCOUPONM• 1 BRAKE SPECIAL 50°0 OFF 1 Lifetime 19 le 1 Brake Pads & Shoes 1 Plus installation. With coupon - good only at White Bear Tires Plus. Not valid with %, { 1 any other discounts or coupons. 11�j PZW(►r Expires B-25-99 - r-----couPON----• FREE 1 lir¢ Rotation 1 Good only at Most Cars 1 White Bear Tires Plus. Not valid with any other discounts 1 or coupons.1 ® NC Z �w U � Hwy 96 Open: Mon. - Fri. 7 am - 9 pm Sat. 7:30 am - 6 pm Sun. 10 am - 5 pm It 1 $1399 I 1 Good only at White Bear Tires Plus. Not valid with any other discounts or coupons. Expires B-25-99 1 Add $1.99 disposal fee. (most cam) With Coupon iiiiiiiiiiitCOUPONM• 1 BRAKE SPECIAL 50°0 OFF 1 Lifetime 19 le 1 Brake Pads & Shoes 1 Plus installation. With coupon - good only at White Bear Tires Plus. Not valid with %, { 1 any other discounts or coupons. 11�j PZW(►r Expires B-25-99 - r-----couPON----• FREE 1 lir¢ Rotation 1 Good only at Most Cars 1 White Bear Tires Plus. Not valid with any other discounts 1 or coupons.1