Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF LAKE ELMO <br />WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br />RESOLUTION NO. 2003 -009 <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE CONCEPT PLAN OF WHISTLING VALLEY <br />WHEREAS, Bald Eagle Development and David Sorenson have made application for a <br />Concept Plan to create twenty -one residential building lots on a parcel of 58 acres. <br />The property is located on the north side of 10`h Street, and west of Keats Avenue, legally <br />described as: <br />THAT PART OF THE W 1/4 OF THE SE' /4 OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 29 NORTH, <br />RANGE 21 WEST, WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA, DESCRIBED AS <br />FOLLOWS: BEGINNING AT THE S' /4 CORNER OF SAID SECTION 27; THENCE <br />ALONG THE W LINE OF SAID SE 1/4, NO° 42'40" W, 1,825.46 FEET TO A POINT <br />ON THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF A PARCEL CONVEYED TO WASHINGTON <br />COUNTY BY DEED RECORDED AS DOCUMENT 338329, WASHINGTON <br />COUNTY RECORDS: THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE N890 11'43" E, <br />511.07 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, N0° 42' <br />52 "W, 153.25 FEET; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, <br />N890 11' 40 "E, 807.36 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF SAID W 1/40F THE SE 1/4; <br />THENCE ALONG SAID E LINE SO' 42'43"E, 1,978.76 FEET OF THE S LINE OF <br />SAID SE 1/4; THENCE ALONG SAID S LINE S99° 11' 49 "W, 1,318.45 FEET TO THE <br />POINT OF BEGINNING, SUBJECT TO RIGHT OF STATE OF MINNESOTA FOR <br />ROAD AS RECORDED IN DOCUMENT NO. 505493. <br />WHEREAS, at its January 27, 2003 meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a <br />Public Hearing, reviewed and recommended denial of this application. <br />WHEREAS, the Concept Plan of WHISTLING VALLEY was presented to the City <br />Council at its February 4, 2003 City Council Meeting. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council for the City of Lake <br />Elmo does hereby approve and accept the OP Concept Plan of WHISTLING VALLEY, based on <br />the following Findings. <br />1. The documentation submitted in support of the OP Concept Plan is substantially <br />complete as prescribed by the OP Ordinance. <br />2. The Concept Plan is consistent with the purpose of the Open Space Preservation <br />Ordinance, <br />3. The Concept Plan is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the <br />Comprehensive Plan. <br />